e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 001-33280
HFF, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
51-0610340
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
One Oxford Centre
301 Grant Street, Suite 600
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
15219
(Zip code) |
(412) 281-8714
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Number of shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the registrant
outstanding as of October 29, 2010 was 34,808,574 shares.
HFF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Financial Statements |
|
|
4 |
|
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
|
23 |
|
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
|
|
34 |
|
Item 4. Controls and Procedures |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Legal Proceedings |
|
|
36 |
|
Item 1A. Risk Factors |
|
|
36 |
|
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
|
|
36 |
|
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities |
|
|
36 |
|
Item 4. Removed and Reserved |
|
|
36 |
|
Item 5. Other Information |
|
|
36 |
|
Item 6. Exhibits |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures |
|
|
37 |
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 |
|
|
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 |
|
|
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 |
|
|
|
|
2
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements, which reflect our
current views with respect to, among other things, our operations and financial performance. You
can identify these forward-looking statements by the use of words such as outlook, believes,
expects, potential, continues, may, will, should, seeks, approximately, predicts,
intends, plans, estimates, anticipates or the negative version of these words or other
comparable words. Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties.
Accordingly, there are or will be important factors that could cause actual outcomes or results to
differ materially from those indicated in these statements. We believe these factors include, but
are not limited to, those described under Risk Factors. These factors should not be construed as
exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with the other cautionary statements that are included
in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or review any
forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or
otherwise.
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING THE REGISTRANT
In connection with our initial public offering of our Class A common stock in February 2007,
we effected a reorganization of our business, which had previously been conducted through HFF
Holdings LLC (HFF Holdings) and certain of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including Holliday
Fenoglio Fowler, L.P. and HFF Securities L.P. (together, the Operating Partnerships) and Holliday
GP Corp. (Holliday GP). In the reorganization, HFF, Inc., a newly-formed Delaware corporation,
purchased from HFF Holdings all of the shares of Holliday GP, which is the sole general partner of
each of the Operating Partnerships, and approximately 45% of the partnership units in each of the
Operating Partnerships (including partnership units in the Operating Partnerships held by Holliday
GP) in exchange for the net proceeds from the initial public offering and one share of Class B
common stock of HFF, Inc. Following the reorganization and as of September 30, 2010, HFF Holdings
had exchanged an additional 49% of the partnership units in each of the Operating Partnerships for
shares of Class A common stock of the Company pursuant to the Exchange Right (as defined in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q). Following this reorganization and the closing of the initial
public offering on February 5, 2007, and as of the filing date of this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q, HFF, Inc. is a holding company holding approximately 94% of the partnership units in the
Operating Partnerships and all of the outstanding shares of Holliday GP. HFF Holdings and HFF,
Inc., through their wholly-owned subsidiaries, are the only limited partners of the Operating
Partnerships. We refer to these transactions collectively in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as
the Reorganization Transactions. Unless we state otherwise, the information in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q gives effect to these Reorganization Transactions.
Unless the context otherwise requires, references to (1) HFF Holdings refer solely to HFF
Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that was previously the holding company for our
consolidated subsidiaries, and not to any of its subsidiaries, (2) HFF LP refer to Holliday
Fenoglio Fowler, L.P., a Texas limited partnership, (3) HFF Securities refer to HFF Securities
L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and registered broker-dealer, (4) Holliday GP refer to
Holliday GP Corp., a Delaware corporation and the general partner of HFF LP and HFF Securities, (5)
Partnership Holdings refer to HFF Partnership Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
and a wholly-owned subsidiary of HFF, Inc., and (6) Holdings Sub refer to HFF LP Acquisition LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company and wholly-owned subsidiary of HFF Holdings. Our business
operations are conducted by HFF LP and HFF Securities, which are sometimes referred to in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as the Operating Partnerships. Also, except where specifically
noted, references in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the Company, we or us mean HFF,
Inc., a Delaware corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, after giving effect to the
Reorganization Transactions.
3
PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
HFF, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(audited) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
61,265 |
|
|
$ |
40,931 |
|
Restricted cash (Note 7) |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
1,175 |
|
|
|
569 |
|
Receivable from affiliate (Note 16) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes receivable (Note 8) |
|
|
11,040 |
|
|
|
38,800 |
|
Prepaid taxes |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
1,331 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
Deferred tax asset, net |
|
|
1,452 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets, net |
|
|
76,526 |
|
|
|
82,458 |
|
Property and equipment, net (Note 4) |
|
|
3,604 |
|
|
|
4,171 |
|
Deferred tax asset, net |
|
|
165,349 |
|
|
|
123,564 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
3,712 |
|
|
|
3,712 |
|
Intangible assets, net (Note 5) |
|
|
9,635 |
|
|
|
9,327 |
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
259,407 |
|
|
$ |
223,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt (Note 7) |
|
$ |
191 |
|
|
$ |
152 |
|
Warehouse line of credit (Note 8) |
|
|
11,040 |
|
|
|
38,800 |
|
Accrued compensation and related taxes |
|
|
11,118 |
|
|
|
5,112 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
866 |
|
Payable to affiliate (Note 16) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
1,798 |
|
|
|
2,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
24,689 |
|
|
|
47,703 |
|
Deferred rent credit |
|
|
2,820 |
|
|
|
3,238 |
|
Payable under the tax receivable agreement (Note 12) |
|
|
147,081 |
|
|
|
105,521 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Long-term debt, less current portion (Note 7) |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
174,787 |
|
|
|
156,639 |
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 175,000,000 authorized; 34,908,300 and
17,263,281 shares issued, respectively; 34,808,574 and 17,183,232 shares outstanding,
respectively |
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 1 share authorized, and 1 share outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock, 99,726 and 80,049 shares at cost, respectively |
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
|
(173 |
) |
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
62,080 |
|
|
|
28,498 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
18,615 |
|
|
|
12,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total parent stockholders equity |
|
|
80,747 |
|
|
|
40,501 |
|
Noncontrolling interest (Note 13) |
|
|
3,873 |
|
|
|
26,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
84,620 |
|
|
|
67,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
259,407 |
|
|
$ |
223,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
4
HFF, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Dollars in Thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital markets services revenue
|
|
$ |
36,758 |
|
|
$ |
19,483 |
|
|
$ |
89,196 |
|
|
$ |
46,381 |
|
Interest on mortgage notes receivable
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
1,215 |
|
|
|
2,392 |
|
Other
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,490 |
|
|
|
20,612 |
|
|
|
91,036 |
|
|
|
50,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services
|
|
|
21,100 |
|
|
|
12,185 |
|
|
|
52,058 |
|
|
|
33,069 |
|
Personnel
|
|
|
3,184 |
|
|
|
1,425 |
|
|
|
8,814 |
|
|
|
4,835 |
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
1,807 |
|
|
|
1,942 |
|
|
|
5,236 |
|
|
|
5,707 |
|
Travel and entertainment
|
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
2,668 |
|
|
|
2,053 |
|
Supplies, research, and printing
|
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
2,154 |
|
|
|
1,645 |
|
Insurance
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
1,363 |
|
|
|
1,419 |
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
1,132 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
2,777 |
|
|
|
2,606 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
911 |
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
2,745 |
|
|
|
2,617 |
|
Interest on warehouse line of credit
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
1,402 |
|
Other operating
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
2,405 |
|
|
|
2,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,574 |
|
|
|
19,772 |
|
|
|
80,976 |
|
|
|
57,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
5,916 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
10,060 |
|
|
|
(7,096 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income, net
|
|
|
1,636 |
|
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
7,332 |
|
|
|
3,322 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(373 |
) |
Decrease in payable under the tax receivable agreement
|
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
1,694 |
|
|
|
798 |
|
|
|
1,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
8,346 |
|
|
|
3,403 |
|
|
|
18,139 |
|
|
|
(2,453 |
) |
Income tax expense
|
|
|
3,890 |
|
|
|
2,114 |
|
|
|
5,908 |
|
|
|
1,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
4,456 |
|
|
|
1,289 |
|
|
|
12,231 |
|
|
|
(3,526 |
) |
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
1,328 |
|
|
|
5,620 |
|
|
|
(1,244 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest
|
|
$ |
3,989 |
|
|
$ |
(39 |
) |
|
$ |
6,611 |
|
|
$ |
(2,282 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share Basic and Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest Basic
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
5
HFF, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity
(Dollars in Thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controlling Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Equity |
|
Stockholders equity, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
17,183,232 |
|
|
$ |
172 |
|
|
|
80,049 |
|
|
$ |
(173 |
) |
|
$ |
28,498 |
|
|
$ |
12,004 |
|
|
$ |
26,504 |
|
|
$ |
67,005 |
|
Stock compensation and other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
519 |
|
Issuance of Class A common stock |
|
|
17,645,019 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,190 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of Class A common stock |
|
|
(19,677 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,677 |
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
Record the adjustment to give effect of
the tax receivable agreement with HFF
Holdings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,049 |
|
Distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,061 |
) |
|
|
(1,061 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,611 |
|
|
|
5,620 |
|
|
|
12,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity, September 30, 2010 |
|
|
34,808,574 |
|
|
$ |
348 |
|
|
|
99,726 |
|
|
$ |
(296 |
) |
|
$ |
62,080 |
|
|
$ |
18,615 |
|
|
$ |
3,873 |
|
|
$ |
84,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controlling Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity, December 31, 2008 |
|
|
16,446,480 |
|
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
26,206 |
|
|
$ |
12,756 |
|
|
$ |
26,500 |
|
|
$ |
65,626 |
|
Stock compensation and other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
913 |
|
Issuance of Class A common stock |
|
|
172,399 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Repurchase of Class A common stock |
|
|
(80,049 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
80,049 |
|
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
Distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
Net (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,282 |
) |
|
|
(1,244 |
) |
|
|
(3,526 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity, September 30, 2009 |
|
|
16,538,830 |
|
|
$ |
165 |
|
|
|
80,049 |
|
|
$ |
(173 |
) |
|
$ |
27,119 |
|
|
$ |
10,474 |
|
|
$ |
25,219 |
|
|
$ |
62,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
6
HFF, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
12,231 |
|
|
$ |
(3,526 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock based compensation |
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
913 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
5,691 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
Decrease in payable under the tax receivable agreement |
|
|
(798 |
) |
|
|
(1,693 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
1,105 |
|
Intangibles |
|
|
1,775 |
|
|
|
1,512 |
|
Gain on sale or disposition of assets, net |
|
|
(4,358 |
) |
|
|
(2,417 |
) |
Mortgage service rights assumed |
|
|
(783 |
) |
|
|
(568 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
3,032 |
|
|
|
1,560 |
|
Increase (decrease) in cash from changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(606 |
) |
|
|
184 |
|
Receivable from /payable to affiliates |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
Payable under the tax receivable agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,258 |
) |
Deferred taxes, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Mortgage notes receivable |
|
|
27,760 |
|
|
|
5,076 |
|
Net borrowings on warehouse line of credit |
|
|
(27,760 |
) |
|
|
(5,076 |
) |
Prepaid taxes, prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
4,105 |
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
27 |
|
Accrued compensation and related taxes |
|
|
6,006 |
|
|
|
(645 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(324 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
(921 |
) |
|
|
228 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
(426 |
) |
|
|
(319 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
21,834 |
|
|
|
(1,279 |
) |
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
Issuance of common stock, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
(173 |
) |
Distributions to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(1,061 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(1,328 |
) |
|
|
(315 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash |
|
|
20,334 |
|
|
|
(1,648 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
40,931 |
|
|
|
37,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
61,265 |
|
|
$ |
35,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
7
HFF, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Organization and Basis of Presentation
Organization
HFF, Inc., through its Operating Partnerships, Holliday Fenoglio Fowler, L.P., a Texas limited
partnership (HFF LP) and HFF Securities L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and registered
broker-dealer (HFF Securities and together with HFF LP, the Operating Partnerships), is a
commercial real estate financial intermediary that provides commercial real estate and capital
markets services including debt placement, investment sales, structured finance and private equity
placements, investment banking and advisory services, loan sales and loan sale advisory services,
commercial loan servicing and commercial real estate and capital markets advice through its 17
offices in the United States.
Offering and Reorganization
HFF, Inc., a Delaware corporation (together with Holliday GP and the Operating Partnerships,
collectively referred to as the Company), was formed in November 2006 in connection with a
proposed initial public offering of its Class A common stock. On November 9, 2006, HFF, Inc. filed
a registration statement on Form S-1 with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) relating to a proposed underwritten initial public offering of 14,300,000 shares of Class A
common stock of HFF, Inc. (the Offering). On January 30, 2007, the SEC declared the registration
statement on Form S-1 effective and the Company priced 14,300,000 shares for the initial public
offering at a price of $18.00 per share. On January 31, 2007, the Companys common stock began
trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol HF.
The proceeds of the initial public offering were used to purchase from HFF Holdings all of the
shares of Holliday GP and partnership units representing approximately 39% of each of the Operating
Partnerships (including partnership units in the Operating Partnerships held by Holliday GP).
On February 21, 2007, the underwriters exercised their option to purchase an additional 2,145,000
shares of Class A common stock (15% of original issuance) at $18.00 per share. These proceeds were
used to purchase HFF Holdings partnership units representing approximately 6.0% of each of the
Operating Partnerships. The Company did not retain any of the proceeds from the Offering.
In addition to cash received for its sale of all of the shares of Holliday GP and approximately 45%
of partnership units of each of the Operating Partnerships (including partnership units in the
Operating Partnerships held by Holliday GP), HFF Holdings also received an exchange right that
permits HFF Holdings to exchange interests in the Operating Partnerships for shares of (i) HFF,
Inc.s Class A common stock (the Exchange Right) and (ii) rights under a tax receivable agreement
between the Company and HFF Holdings. See Notes 13 and 12 for further discussion of the Exchange
Right held by the noncontrolling interest holder and tax receivable agreement, respectively.
As a result of the reorganization, the Company became a holding company through a series of
transactions pursuant to a sale and purchase agreement. Pursuant to the Offering and
reorganization, HFF, Inc.s sole assets are through its wholly-owned subsidiary HFF Partnership
Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (HoldCo LLC), partnership interests of HFF LP
and HFF Securities and all of the shares of Holliday GP. The transactions that occurred in
connection with the initial public offering and reorganization are referred to as the
Reorganization Transactions.
In June 2010, the members of HFF Holdings agreed to modify the Exchange Right so as to permit
certain participating members of HFF Holdings who voluntarily agreed to certain conditions to
exchange in June 2010 all of its partnership units in the Operating Partnerships that corresponded
to certain participating members interests in HFF Holdings for shares of Class A common stock. The
participating members of HFF Holdings were then entitled to redeem all of their respective
membership units in HFF Holdings for such shares of Class A common stock. This modification was
conditioned upon each participating members agreement to extend the term of his or her existing
non-competition and non-solicitation agreement to March 2015 and the imposition of resale
restrictions on a portion of his or her shares of Class A common stock received pursuant to the
Exchange Right exercise. The shares of Class A common stock subject to the resale restrictions
equal 4,020,640 shares in the aggregate, which is equal to 25% of the original number of shares of
Class A common stock that such participating members would have received following an exchange of
100% of their membership units in HFF Holdings held at the time of the initial public offering.
The voluntarily-imposed restrictions will begin to be released in March 2013. In March 2013, 33%
or approximately 1.34 million of the newly restricted shares of Class A common stock
8
will be eligible to be freely sold, with a like amount of the newly-restricted shares of Class A
common stock becoming eligible to be freely sold in each of March 2014 and in March 2015. The
contractual provisions setting forth these new resale restrictions can be waived, amended or
terminated by the members of HFF Holdings following consultation with the Companys Board of
Directors. Members choosing not to participate in the modification of the Exchange Right continued
to be subject to their existing non-competition and non-solicitation agreements and the Exchange
Right restrictions that were effective at the time of the initial public offering.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of HFF, Inc. as of September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 and for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and September
30, 2009, include the accounts of HFF LP, HFF Securities, and HFF, Inc.s wholly-owned
subsidiaries, Holliday GP and HoldCo LLC. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions
have been eliminated.
The purchase of shares of Holliday GP and partnership units in each of the Operating Partnerships
are treated as a reorganization under common control for financial reporting purposes. HFF Holdings
owned 100% of Holliday GP, HFF LP Acquisition, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (Holdings
Sub), and the Operating Partnerships prior to the Reorganization Transactions. The initial
purchase of shares of Holliday GP and the initial purchase of units in the Operating Partnerships
were accounted for at historical cost, with no change in basis for financial reporting purposes.
Accordingly, the net assets of HFF Holdings purchased by HFF, Inc. are reported in the consolidated
financial statements of HFF, Inc. at HFF Holdings historical cost.
As the sole stockholder of Holliday GP (the sole general partner of the Operating Partnerships),
HFF, Inc. now operates and controls all of the business and affairs of the Operating Partnerships.
HFF, Inc. consolidates the financial results of the Operating Partnerships, and the ownership
interest of HFF Holdings in the Operating Partnerships is treated as a noncontrolling interest in
HFF, Inc.s consolidated financial statements. HFF Holdings, through its wholly-owned subsidiary
(Holdings Sub), and HFF, Inc., through its wholly-owned subsidiaries (HoldCo LLC and Holliday GP),
are the only partners of the Operating Partnerships following the offering.
Reclassifications
Certain items in the consolidated financial statements of prior years have been reclassified to
conform to the current years presentation.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
These interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) for interim financial information, the
instructions to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X and should be read
in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Accordingly, significant accounting policies and disclosures normally provided have been omitted as
such items are disclosed therein. In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of
normal and recurring entries considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the
interim periods presented have been included. The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts in the
financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates are based on information available as
of the date of the unaudited consolidated financial statements. Therefore, actual results could
differ from those estimates. Furthermore, operating results for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the year ending
December 31, 2010.
Transfers of Financial Assets
The Company is qualified with the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) as a Freddie
Mac Multifamily Program Plus® Seller/Servicer. Under this Program, the Company
originates mortgages based on commitments from Freddie Mac, and then sells the loans to Freddie Mac
typically within one month following the loan originations. The Company sells the entire loan to
Freddie Mac without recourse to Freddie Mac and the transferred asset qualifies as a participating
interest as defined in the accounting standards. The transfers of these financial assets qualify
as sales under the accounting standards for transfers and servicing of financial assets as the
Company, as the transferor, is transferring the entire financial asset represented by the loan, the
transferred assets are legally isolated from the Company upon the sale to Freddie Mac, Freddie Mac
has the right to pledge or exchange the loans, there is no constraint on Freddie Mac that provides
any benefit to the Company nor does the Company maintain control over the transferred financial
assets through its market-based servicing contracts, which is the Companys only form of continuing
involvement
9
in the transferred loans. See Notes 5 and 6 for further discussion on the valuation of the
mortgage servicing rights and impact on earnings during the period.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) amended ASC 810, Amendments to FASB
Interpretation No. 46(R) (ASC 810), which requires an enterprise to perform an analysis to
determine whether the enterprises variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial
interest in a variable interest entity. ASC 810 was effective for fiscal periods ending after
December 15, 2009 and adopted by the Company on January 1, 2010. The adoption of the guidance had
no impact on the Companys consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued FAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (as codified in ASC topic 860, Transfers and Servicing (ASC
860)). This update to ASC 860 removes the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and
removes the exception from applying ASC 810 to qualifying special-purpose entities. ASC 860 was
effective for fiscal periods ending after November 15, 2009 and adopted by the Company on January
1, 2010. The adoption of the amended guidance had no impact on the Company.
3. Stock Compensation
During the three month period ending September 30, 2010, 16,412 vested restricted stock units were
converted to Class A common stock and no new restricted stock units were granted. During the three
month period ending September 30, 2010, no stock options were granted or forfeited.
The stock compensation cost that has been charged against income for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2010 was $0.1 million and $0.5 million, respectively, which is recorded in
Personnel expenses in the consolidated statements of income. The stock compensation cost that has
been charged against income for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2009 was $0.3
million and $0.9 million, respectively. At September 30, 2010, there was approximately $0.5 million
of unrecognized compensation cost related to share based awards.
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, no options vested or were exercised.
The fair value of vested restricted stock units was $0.7 million at September 30, 2010.
The weighted average remaining contractual term of the nonvested restricted stock units was 1.3
years as of September 30, 2010.
4. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Furniture and equipment |
|
$ |
3,776 |
|
|
$ |
3,618 |
|
Computer equipment |
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
1,031 |
|
Capitalized software costs |
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
5,915 |
|
|
|
5,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
11,280 |
|
|
|
11,106 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(7,676 |
) |
|
|
(6,935 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,604 |
|
|
$ |
4,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 the Company has recorded, within furniture and
equipment, office equipment under capital leases of $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively,
including accumulated amortization of $0.3 million for both periods presented, which is included
within depreciation and amortization expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.
See Note 7 for discussion of the related capital lease obligations.
10
5. Intangible Assets
The Companys intangible assets are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Book |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Book |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
Amortizable intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
15,506 |
|
|
$ |
(5,980 |
) |
|
$ |
9,526 |
|
|
$ |
13,476 |
|
|
$ |
(4,296 |
) |
|
$ |
9,180 |
|
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
(510 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
Non-compete agreement |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
34 |
|
Unamortizable intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINRA license |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
$ |
15,706 |
|
|
$ |
(6,071 |
) |
|
$ |
9,635 |
|
|
$ |
14,199 |
|
|
$ |
(4,872 |
) |
|
$ |
9,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company serviced $25.0 billion and $25.3
billion, respectively, of commercial loans. The Company earned $2.9 million and $8.6 million in
servicing fees and interest on float and escrow balances for the three and nine month periods
ending September 30, 2010, respectively. The Company earned $2.8 million and $8.1 million in
servicing fees and interest on float and escrow balances for the three and nine month periods
ending September 30, 2009, respectively. These revenues are recorded as capital markets services
revenues in the consolidated statements of income.
The total commercial loan servicing portfolio includes loans for which there are no corresponding
mortgage servicing rights recorded on the balance sheet, as these servicing rights were assumed
prior to January 1, 2007 and involved no initial consideration paid by the Company. The Company has
recorded mortgage servicing rights of $9.5 million and $9.2 million on $14.2 billion and $12.9
billion, respectively, of the total loans serviced as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
The Company stratifies its servicing portfolio based on the type of loan, including life company
loans, commercial mortgage backed securities (CMBS), Freddie Mac and limited-service life company
loans.
Mortgage servicing rights do not trade in an active, open market with readily available observable
prices. Since there is no ready market value for the mortgage servicing rights, such as quoted
market prices or prices based on sales or purchases of similar assets, the Company determines the
fair value of the mortgage servicing rights by estimating the present value of future cash flows
associated with the servicing of the loans. Management makes certain assumptions and judgments in
estimating the fair value of servicing rights. The estimate is based on a number of assumptions,
including the benefits of servicing (contractual servicing fees and interest on escrow and float
balances), the cost of servicing, prepayment rates (including risk of default), an inflation rate,
the expected life of the cash flows and the discount rate. The significant assumptions utilized to
value servicing rights as of September 30, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Expected life of cash flows |
|
3 years to 10 years |
|
|
3 years to 10 years |
|
Discount rate (1) |
|
15% to 20% |
|
|
15% to 20% |
|
Prepayment rate |
|
0% to 8% |
|
|
0% to 8% |
|
Inflation rate |
|
2% |
|
|
2% |
|
Cost of service per loan |
|
$1,600 to $4,619 |
|
|
$1,600 to $4,220 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects the time value of money and the risk of future cash flows related to the possible
cancellation of servicing contracts, transferability restrictions on certain servicing
contracts, concentration in the life company portfolio and large loan risk. |
The above assumptions are subject to change based on managements judgments and estimates of future
changes in the risks related to future cash flows and interest rates. Changes in these factors
would cause a corresponding increase or decrease in the prepayment rates and discount rates used in
our valuation model.
11
Changes in the carrying value of mortgage servicing rights for the nine month periods ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, and the fair value at the end of each period were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sold / |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FV at |
|
Category |
|
12/31/09 |
|
|
Capitalized |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Transferred |
|
|
9/30/10 |
|
|
9/30/10 |
|
Freddie Mac |
|
$ |
5,833 |
|
|
$ |
1,632 |
|
|
$ |
(810 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,426 |
) |
|
$ |
5,229 |
|
|
$ |
6,249 |
|
CMBS |
|
|
2,429 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
(380 |
) |
|
|
1,119 |
|
|
|
3,266 |
|
|
|
3,639 |
|
Life company |
|
|
779 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
(497 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
1,065 |
|
Life company limited |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
9,180 |
|
|
$ |
2,415 |
|
|
$ |
(1,762 |
) |
|
$ |
(307 |
) |
|
$ |
9,526 |
|
|
$ |
11,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sold / |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FV at |
|
Category |
|
12/31/08 |
|
|
Capitalized |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Transferred |
|
|
9/30/09 |
|
|
9/30/09 |
|
Freddie Mac |
|
$ |
3,266 |
|
|
$ |
1,317 |
|
|
$ |
(580 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,003 |
|
|
$ |
4,497 |
|
CMBS |
|
|
2,861 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
(442 |
) |
|
|
2,446 |
|
|
|
2,907 |
|
Life company |
|
|
991 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
(394 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
819 |
|
|
|
964 |
|
Life company limited |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,311 |
|
|
$ |
1,954 |
|
|
$ |
(1,389 |
) |
|
$ |
(442 |
) |
|
$ |
7,434 |
|
|
$ |
8,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts capitalized represent mortgage servicing rights retained upon the sale of originated loans
to Freddie Mac and mortgage servicing rights acquired without the exchange of initial
consideration. The Company recorded mortgage servicing rights retained upon the sale of originated
loans to Freddie Mac of $0.7 million and $1.6 million on $287.3 million and $553.0 million of
loans, respectively, during the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2010 and $0.5
million and $1.3 million on $131.3 million and $398.2 million of loans, respectively, during the
three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2009. The Company recorded mortgage servicing
rights acquired without the exchange of initial consideration of $0.3 million and $0.8 million on
$522.4 million and $1.4 billion of loans, respectively, during the three and nine month periods
ending September 30, 2010 and $0.3 million and $0.6 million on $392.8 million and $778.9 million of
loans, respectively, during the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2009. During the
nine months ending September 30, 2010, the Company sold the cashiering portion of certain Freddie
Mac mortgage servicing rights. While the Company transferred the risks and rewards of ownership of
the cashiering portion of the mortgage servicing rights, the Company continues to perform limited
servicing activities on these loans for a reduced market-based fee. Therefore, the remaining
servicing rights were transferred to the CMBS servicing tranche. The net result of these
transactions was the Company recording a gain in the three and nine months ending September 30,
2010 of $0.3 million and $2.7 million, respectively, within Interest and Other income, net in the
consolidated statements of income. In June 2009, the Company sold mortgage servicing rights with a
net book value of $0.4 million and recognized a gain on sale of $1.1 million which was recorded in
Interest and other income, net in the consolidated financial statements. These amounts are recorded
in interest and other income, net in the consolidated statements of income.
Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $0.6 million and $1.8 million during the
three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and $0.5 million and $1.5
million during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2009, respectively, and is
recorded in depreciation and amortization in the consolidated statements of income.
Estimated amortization expense for the next five years is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2010 |
|
$ |
584 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2,060 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,744 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1,427 |
|
2014 |
|
|
1,211 |
|
2015 |
|
|
984 |
|
The weighted-average life of the mortgage servicing rights intangible asset was 6.3 years at
September 30, 2010. The remaining life of the non-compete agreement intangible asset was 0.3 years
at September 30, 2010.
6. Fair Value Measurement
The Company adopted ASC 820 as of January 1, 2008. ASC 820 establishes a valuation hierarchy for
disclosure of the inputs to valuation used to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the
inputs into the following three levels: Level 1 inputs which are quoted market prices in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2 inputs which are observable market-based
inputs or
12
unobservable inputs corroborated by market data for the asset or liability; and Level 3 inputs
which are unobservable inputs based on our own assumptions that are not corroborated by market
data. A financial asset or liabilitys classification within the hierarchy is determined based on
the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
As of September 30, 2010, the Company did not have any assets or liabilities recognized at fair
value on a recurring basis.
In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, from time to time, the Company
measures certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These assets may include mortgage
servicing rights and mortgage notes receivable. The mortgage servicing rights were not measured at
fair value during the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 as the Company continues to
utilize the amortization method under ASC 860 and the fair value of the mortgage servicing rights
exceeds the carrying value at September 30, 2010. See Note 5 for further discussion on the
assumptions used in valuing the mortgage servicing rights and impact on earnings during the period.
The fair value of the mortgage notes receivable was based on prices observable in the market for
similar loans and equaled carrying value at September 30, 2010. Therefore, no lower of cost or fair
value adjustment was required.
7. Long-Term Debt and Capital Lease Obligations
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations consist of the following at September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Bank term note payable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt and capital leases |
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
Less current maturities |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital leases |
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) The Credit Agreement
On February 5, 2007, HFF LP entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Bank of
America (Amended Credit Agreement). The Amended Credit Agreement was comprised of a $40.0 million
revolving credit facility, which replaced the old Credit Agreement that was paid off in connection
with the initial public offering. The Amended Credit Agreement matured on February 5, 2010 and may
have been extended for one year based on certain conditions as defined in the agreement. HFF LP
chose not to extend the Amended Credit Agreement. The Amended Credit Agreement required payment of
a commitment fee of 0.2% or 0.3% on the unused amount of credit based on the total amount
outstanding. During the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Company corrected an error related to
previously unrecorded commitment fees on its unused line of credit and recorded approximately
$260,000 of interest expense that represented the cumulative amount of commitment fees for the
period from February 5, 2007 to March 31, 2009. This correction was not considered material to
restate prior period financial statements. HFF LP did not borrow on this revolving credit facility
during the period February 5, 2007 through February 5, 2010.
(b) Letters of Credit and Capital Lease Obligations
At each September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had outstanding letters of credit of
approximately $0.1 million, respectively, as security for two leases. The Company segregated the
cash in a separate bank account to collateralize the letters of credit. The letters of credit
expire at various dates through 2011, one of which can be extended for one year. The other letter
of credit will be terminated at the expiration of the corresponding lease term in December 2010.
Capital lease obligations consist primarily of office equipment leases that expire at various dates
through September 2013. A summary of future minimum lease payments under capital leases at
September 30, 2010 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2010 |
|
$ |
54 |
|
2011 |
|
|
163 |
|
2012 |
|
|
106 |
|
2013 |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
358 |
|
|
|
|
|
13
8. Warehouse Line of Credit
In 2005, HFF LP obtained an uncommitted, unlimited warehouse revolving line of credit for the
purpose of funding the Freddie Mac mortgage loans that it originates through Red Mortgage Capital,
Inc. (Red Capital). In October 2007, this warehouse line was limited to $150.0 million by Red
Capital. In November 2007, the Company entered into an uncommitted $50.0 million line of credit
note with The Huntington Bank (Huntington) to serve as a supplement to the existing warehouse
line of credit with Red Capital. In December 2009 HFF LP entered into an amended and restated line
of credit with Huntington. Under the terms of the new arrangement with Huntington, availability
was increased from $50 million up to $100 million through March 1, 2010, at which time total
availability decreased to $75 million. During December 2009, the financing arrangement with Red
Capital ended and HFF LP also entered into an agreement with PNC Bank, N.A. (PNC), which provided
for continued warehouse funding under similar uncommitted arrangements as HFF LP had with Red
Capital, with an increased availability from $150 million to $175 million.
Each funding is separately approved on a transaction-by-transaction basis and is collateralized by
a loan and mortgage on a multifamily property that is ultimately purchased by Freddie Mac. As of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, HFF LP had $11.0 million and $38.8 million, respectively,
outstanding on the warehouse lines of credit and a corresponding amount of mortgage notes
receivable. Interest on the warehouse lines of credit is at the 30-day LIBOR rate (0.26% and 0.23%
at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively) plus a spread. HFF LP is also paid
interest on its loan secured by a multifamily loan at the rate in the Freddie Mac note.
9. Lease Commitments
The Company leases various corporate offices, parking spaces, and office equipment under
noncancelable operating leases. These leases have initial terms of one to ten years. The majority
of the leases have termination clauses whereby the term may be reduced by two to seven years upon
prior notice and payment of a termination fee by the Company. Total rental expense charged to
operations was $1.4 million and $4.2 million, respectively, during the three and nine month periods
ended September 30, 2010 and $1.5 million and $4.5 million, respectively, during the three and nine
month periods ended September 30, 2009 and is recorded within occupancy expense in the consolidated
statements of income.
Future minimum rental payments for the next five years under operating leases with noncancelable
terms in excess of one year and without regard to early termination provisions are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2010 |
|
$ |
1,236 |
|
2011 |
|
|
4,168 |
|
2012 |
|
|
4,024 |
|
2013 |
|
|
3,147 |
|
2014 |
|
|
1,573 |
|
2015 |
|
|
1,085 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
From time to time the Company subleases certain office space to subtenants which may be canceled at
any time. The rental income received from these subleases is included as a reduction of occupancy
expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.
The Company also leases certain office equipment under capital leases that expire at various dates
through 2013. See Note 4 and Note 7 above for further description of the assets and related
obligations recorded under these capital leases at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively.
HFF Holdings is not an obligor, nor does it guarantee any, of the Companys leases.
10. Servicing
The Company services commercial real estate loans for investors. The unpaid principal balance of
the servicing portfolio totaled $25.0 billion and $25.3 billion at September 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009, respectively.
In connection with its servicing activities, the Company holds funds in escrow for the benefit of
mortgagors for hazard insurance, real estate taxes and other financing arrangements. At September
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the funds held in escrow totaled $89.1 million and $94.7 million,
respectively. These funds, and the offsetting liabilities of the borrowers to external parties, are
not presented
14
in the Companys consolidated financial statements as they do not represent the assets
and liabilities of the Company. Pursuant to the requirements of the various investors for which the
Company services loans, the Company maintains bank accounts, holding escrow funds, which have
balances in excess of the FDIC insurance limit. The fees earned on these escrow funds are reported
in capital markets services revenue in the consolidated statements of income.
11. Legal Proceedings
The Company is party to various litigation matters, in most cases involving ordinary course and
routine claims incidental to its business. The Company cannot estimate with certainty its ultimate
legal and financial liability with respect to any pending matters. In accordance with ASC 450,
Contingencies, a reserve for estimated losses is recorded when the amount is probable and can be
reasonably estimated. However, the Company believes, based on examination of such pending matters,
that its ultimate liability will not have a material adverse effect on its business or financial
condition.
12. Income Taxes
Income tax expense includes current and deferred taxes as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Total |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,429 |
|
|
$ |
4,429 |
|
State |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
1,262 |
|
|
|
1,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
217 |
|
|
$ |
5,691 |
|
|
$ |
5,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Total |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
(835 |
) |
|
$ |
(712 |
) |
State |
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
1,369 |
|
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
539 |
|
|
$ |
534 |
|
|
$ |
1,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reconciliation between the income tax computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory rate and
the effective tax rate on net income is as follows for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Pre-tax book income (loss) |
|
$ |
18,139 |
|
|
$ |
(2,453 |
) |
Less: pre-tax income (loss) allocated to noncontrolling interest holder |
|
|
5,651 |
|
|
|
(1,232 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax book income (loss) after noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
12,488 |
|
|
$ |
(1,221 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Income tax expense / (benefit) |
|
|
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate |
|
Taxes computed at federal rate |
|
$ |
4,371 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
$ |
(415 |
) |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
State and local taxes, net of federal tax benefit |
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
Change in income tax benefit payable to stockholder |
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
(643 |
) |
|
|
52.7 |
% |
Effect of deferred rate change |
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
2,047 |
|
|
|
(167.6 |
)% |
Effect on change in valuation allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
23.2 |
% |
Stock compensation |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
(12.7 |
)% |
Adjustment for prior years taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
(5.2 |
)% |
Meals and entertainment |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
(11.6 |
)% |
Other |
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
)% |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
5,908 |
|
|
|
47.3 |
% |
|
$ |
1,073 |
|
|
|
(87.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, included
income tax expense of $31,000 and $12,000, respectively, of state and local taxes on income
allocated to the noncontrolling interest holder, which represents 0.2% and 1.0% of the total
effective rate, respectively.
15
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities consist of the following at September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Deferred income tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 754 election tax basis step-up |
|
$ |
177,340 |
|
|
$ |
128,726 |
|
Tenant improvements |
|
|
1,483 |
|
|
|
668 |
|
Net operating loss carryforward |
|
|
12,179 |
|
|
|
11,133 |
|
Tax credits |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
Restricted stock units |
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
Compensation |
|
|
1,207 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
Other |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192,993 |
|
|
|
141,614 |
|
Less: valuation allowance |
|
|
(20,831 |
) |
|
|
(15,165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax asset |
|
|
172,162 |
|
|
|
126,449 |
|
Deferred income tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(921 |
) |
|
|
(316 |
) |
Servicing rights |
|
|
(3,322 |
) |
|
|
(1,577 |
) |
Deferred rent |
|
|
(1,118 |
) |
|
|
(477 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liability |
|
|
(5,361 |
) |
|
|
(2,370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax asset |
|
$ |
166,801 |
|
|
$ |
124,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The primary deferred tax asset represents a tax basis step-up election under Section 754 of the
Internal Revenue Code (Section 754) made by HFF, Inc. relating to the initial purchase of units
of the Operating Partnerships in connection with the Reorganization Transactions and a tax basis
step-up on subsequent exchanges of Operating Partnership units for shares of the Companys Class A
common stock since the date of the Reorganization Transactions. As a result of the step-up in
basis from these transactions, the Company is entitled to annual future tax benefits in the form of
amortization for income tax purposes. The annual tax benefit is currently approximately $24.4
million and will increase as future exchanges of Operating Partnership units occur (see Note 13).
To the extent that the Company does not have sufficient taxable income in a year to fully utilize
this annual deduction, the unused benefit is recharacterized as a net operating loss and can then
be carried back three years or carried forward for twenty years. The Company measured the deferred
tax asset based on the estimated income tax effects of the increase in the tax basis of the assets
owned by the Operating Partnerships utilizing the enacted tax rates at the date of the transaction.
In accordance with ASC topic 740, Income Taxes (ASC 740), the tax effects of transactions with
shareholders that result in changes in the tax basis of a companys assets and liabilities are
recognized in equity. The Company recorded a valuation allowance on a portion of the recognized
deferred tax assets recorded in connection with the Reorganization Transactions and the subsequent
exercise of the Exchange Right due to the uncertainty in the timing and level of tax benefits that
would be realized when payments are made to HFF Holdings under the tax receivable agreement (see
further discussion below). Changes in the measurement of the deferred tax assets or the valuation
allowance due to changes in the enacted tax rates upon the finalization of the income tax returns
for the year of the exchange transaction will be recorded in equity. All subsequent changes in the
measurement of the deferred tax assets due to changes in the enacted tax rates or changes in the
valuation allowance are recorded as a component of income tax expense.
The Company will recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in Interest
and other income, net on the consolidated statements of income. There were no interest or
penalties recorded in the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2010 and 2009.
Tax Receivable Agreement
In connection with the Reorganization Transactions, HFF LP and HFF Securities made an election
under Section 754 for 2007, and intend to keep that election in effect for each taxable year in
which an exchange of partnership units for shares occurs. The initial sale as a result of the
offering increased the tax basis of the assets owned by HFF LP and HFF Securities to their fair
market value. This increase in tax basis allows the Company to reduce the amount of future tax
payments to the extent that the Company has future taxable income. As a result of the increase in
tax basis, the Company is entitled to future tax benefits of $177.3 million and has recorded this
amount as a deferred tax asset on its consolidated balance sheet. The Company has updated its
estimate of these future tax benefits based on the changes to the estimated annual effective tax
rate for 2010. The Company is obligated, however, pursuant to its tax receivable agreement with HFF
Holdings, to pay to HFF Holdings 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state
and local income tax that the Company actually realizes as a result of these increases in tax basis
and as a result of certain other tax benefits arising from the Company entering into the tax
receivable agreement and making payments under that agreement. For
16
purposes of the tax receivable agreement, actual cash savings in income tax will be computed by
comparing the Companys actual income tax liability to the amount of such taxes that it would have
been required to pay had there been no increase to the tax basis of the assets of HFF LP and HFF
Securities as a result of the initial sale and later exchanges had the Company not entered into the
tax receivable agreement.
The Company accounts for the income tax effects and corresponding tax receivable agreement effects
as a result of the initial purchase and the sale of units of the Operating Partnerships in
connection with the Reorganization Transactions and future exchanges of Operating Partnership units
for the Companys Class A shares by recognizing a deferred tax asset for the estimated income tax
effects of the increase in the tax basis of the assets owned by the Operating Partnerships, based
on enacted tax rates at the date of the transaction, less any tax valuation allowance the Company
believes is required. In accordance with ASC 740, the tax effects of transactions with shareholders
that result in changes in the tax basis of a companys assets and liabilities will be recognized in
equity. If transactions with shareholders result in the recognition of deferred tax assets from
changes in the Companys tax basis of assets and liabilities, the valuation allowance initially
required upon recognition of these deferred assets will be recorded in equity. Subsequent changes
in enacted tax rates or any valuation allowance are recorded as a component of income tax expense.
The Company believes it is more likely than not that it will realize a portion of the benefit
represented by the deferred tax asset, and, therefore, the Company recorded 85% of this estimated
amount of the increase in deferred tax assets as a liability to HFF Holdings under the tax
receivable agreement and the remaining 15% of the increase in deferred tax assets directly in
additional paid-in capital in stockholders equity. However, due to uncertainties of timing and
amounts of payments, deferred tax assets representing the tax benefits to be realized when future
payments are made to HFF Holdings under the tax receivable agreement are currently not more likely
than not to be realized and, therefore, have a valuation allowance of $20.6 million recorded
against them.
While the actual amount and timing of payments under the tax receivable agreement will depend upon
a number of factors, including the amount and timing of taxable income generated in the future,
changes in future tax rates, the value of individual assets, the portion of the Companys payments
under the tax receivable agreement constituting imputed interest and increases in the tax basis of
the Companys assets resulting in payments to HFF Holdings, the Company has estimated that the
payments that will be made to HFF Holdings will be $147.1 million and has recorded this obligation
to HFF Holdings as a liability on the consolidated balance sheet. In conjunction with the filing of
the Companys 2009 federal and state tax returns, the benefit for 2009 relating to the Section 754
basis step-up was finalized resulting in no tax benefits being realized by the Company for 2009.
In addition, during the nine month period ended September 30, 2010, the tax rates used to measure
the deferred tax assets were updated, which resulted in a reduction of deferred tax assets of $1.3
million, which in turn resulted in a reduction in the payable under the tax receivable agreement of
$1.1 million. In conjunction with the filing of the Companys 2008 federal and state tax returns,
the benefit for 2008 relating to the Section 754 basis step-up was finalized resulting in $2.7
million in tax benefits realized by the Company for 2008. As discussed above, the Company is
obligated to remit to HFF Holdings 85% of any such cash savings in federal and state tax. As such,
during August 2009, the Company paid $2.3 million to HFF Holdings under this tax receivable
agreement. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2009, the tax rates used to measure the
deferred tax assets were updated which resulted in a reduction of deferred tax assets of $2.0
million, which resulted in a reduction in the payable under the tax receivable agreement of $1.7
million. To the extent the Company does not realize all of the tax benefits in future years, this
liability to HFF Holdings may be reduced.
13. Noncontrolling Interest
Noncontrolling interest recorded in the consolidated financial statements of HFF, Inc. relates to
the ownership interest of HFF Holdings in the Operating Partnerships. As a result of the
Reorganization Transactions discussed in Note 1, partners capital was eliminated from equity and
noncontrolling interest of $6.4 million was recorded representing HFF Holdings remaining interest
in the Operating Partnerships following the initial public offering and the underwriters exercise
of the overallotment option on February 21, 2007, along with HFF Holdings proportional share of
net income earned by the Operating Partnerships subsequent to the change in ownership. As discussed
in Note 1, HFF, Inc. is a holding company and, as such, does not generate income other than through
its proportional share of net income earned by the Operating Partnerships. However, HFF, Inc. does
incur certain costs which are not allocated or shared with the Operating Partnerships or their
direct or indirect partners (including HFF Holdings) and, therefore, the net income as shown on the
consolidated statements of income is not proportionately shared between the noncontrolling interest
holder and the controlling interest holder.
As a result of the Reorganization Transactions, HFF Holdings beneficially owned 20,355,000
partnership units in each of the Operating Partnerships. Pursuant to the terms of HFF, Inc.s
amended and restated certificate of incorporation, HFF Holdings can from time to time exchange its
partnership units in the Operating Partnerships for shares of the Companys Class A common stock on
17
the basis of two partnership units, one for each Operating Partnership, for one share of Class A
common stock, subject to customary conversion rate adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends
and reclassifications.
The table below sets forth the noncontrolling interest amount recorded for the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, which includes the exchanges of zero and 17,574,374
partnership units in each of the Operating Partnerships by members of HFF Holdings for an equal
amount of shares of Class A common stock during the three and nine month periods ending September
30, 2010, respectively (dollars in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income (loss) from operating partnerships |
|
$ |
8,063 |
|
|
$ |
2,401 |
|
|
$ |
19,259 |
|
|
$ |
(2,249 |
) |
Noncontrolling interest ownership percentage |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
55.31 |
% |
|
|
(A |
) |
|
|
55.31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
467 |
|
|
$ |
1,328 |
|
|
$ |
5,620 |
|
|
$ |
(1,244 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
During the six months ending June 30, 2010, the ownership of the Operating Partnerships
changed due to the exercise of the Exchange Right by certain participating members of HFF
Holdings at the direction of its members. HFF Holdings ownership percentage in the
Operating Partnerships was 53.6% during January 2010, 53.2% during February 2010, 49.9%
during March 2010, 48.8% during April 2010, 48.1% during May 2010, 44.3% during June 2010
and 5.8% during July, August and September 2010. |
Under the terms of the Exchange Right put in place in connection with the Reorganization
Transactions, beginning in February 2009, HFF Holdings had the right to exchange 25% of its
partnership units, with an additional 25% becoming available for exchange each year thereafter.
However, these contractual provisions could be waived, amended or terminated by the members of HFF
Holdings following consultation with the Companys Board of Directors.
In June 2010, the members of HFF Holdings agreed to modify the Exchange Right so as to permit
certain participating members of HFF Holdings to exchange in June 2010 all of its partnership units
in the Operating Partnerships that corresponded to certain participating members interests in HFF
Holdings for shares of Class A common stock. The participating members of HFF Holdings were then
entitled to redeem all of their respective membership units in HFF Holdings for such shares of
Class A common stock. This modification was conditioned upon each participating members agreement
to extend the term of his or her existing non-competition and non-solicitation agreement to March
2015 and the imposition of resale restrictions on a portion of his or her shares of Class A common
stock received pursuant to the Exchange Right exercise. The shares of Class A common stock subject
to the resale restrictions equal 4,020,640 shares in the aggregate, which is equal to 25% of the
original number of shares of Class A common stock that such participating members would have
received following an exchange of 100% of their membership units in HFF Holdings held at the time
of the initial public offering. The voluntarily-imposed restrictions will begin to be released in
March 2013. In March 2013, 33% or approximately 1.34 million of the newly restricted shares of
Class A common stock will be eligible to be freely sold, with a like amount of the newly-restricted
shares of Class A common stock becoming eligible to be freely sold in each of March 2014 and March
2015. The contractual provisions setting forth these new resale restrictions can be waived, amended
or terminated by the members of HFF Holdings following consultation with the Companys Board of
Directors. Members choosing not to participate in the modification of the Exchange Right continued
to be subject to their existing non-competition and non-solicitation agreements and the Exchange
Right restrictions that were effective at the time of the initial public offering.
Twenty-nine members, including the four inside directors of the Company, representing approximately
91% of the voting equity interests in HFF Holdings, elected to become subject to the conditions
described above. On June 30, 2010, HFF Holdings exchanged all of its partnership units in the
Operating Partnerships that corresponded to such participating members interests in HFF Holdings
for shares of Class A common stock. These shares were then distributed to such participating
members upon the members redemption of their respective membership units in HFF Holdings.
Nine members, representing approximately 9% of the voting equity interests in HFF Holdings, elected
not to become subject to the conditions described above. HFF Holdings partnership units in the
Operating Partnerships that correspond to these members interests in HFF Holdings continue to be
subject to the Exchange Right restrictions effective at the time of the Companys initial public
offering.
The following table reflects the exchangeability of HFF Holdings rights to exchange its
partnership units in the Operating Partnerships for shares of the Companys Class A common stock,
pursuant to contractual provisions in the HFF Holdings operating agreement. However, these
contractual provisions may be waived, amended or terminated by a vote of the members holding 65% of
18
the interests of HFF Holdings following consultation with the Companys Board of Directors.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, HFF, Inc.s amended and restated certificate of incorporation
provides that no holder of Operating Partnership units is entitled to exchange its Operating
Partnership units for shares of Class A common stock if such exchange would be prohibited under
applicable federal or state securities laws or regulations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original Exchange Rights Following the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganization Transactions |
|
|
Reflects the June 2010 Modification of the Exchange Rights |
|
|
|
Number of HFF
Holdings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of HFF |
|
|
|
Partnership Units in the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings Remaining |
|
|
|
Operating Partnerships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Additional |
|
|
Partnership Units in |
|
|
|
Available for Exchange |
|
|
Percentage of HFF |
|
|
Number of Shares of |
|
|
Shares of Class A |
|
|
the Operating |
|
|
|
as |
|
|
Holdings' Partnership |
|
|
Class A Common |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Partnerships |
|
|
|
a result of the |
|
|
Units in the Operating |
|
|
Stock Exchanged |
|
|
Expected to |
|
|
Becoming Eligible |
|
|
|
Reorganization |
|
|
Partnerships Becoming |
|
|
Through September |
|
|
Become Available |
|
|
for |
|
Exchangeability Date: |
|
Transactions |
|
|
Eligible for Exchange |
|
|
30, 2010 |
|
|
for Exchange |
|
|
Exchange |
|
January 31, 2009 |
|
|
5,088,750 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
5,088,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
% |
January 31, 2010 |
|
|
5,088,750 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
5,088,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
% |
January 31, 2011 |
|
|
5,088,750 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
4,020,638 |
|
|
|
1,068,112 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
January 31, 2012 |
|
|
5,088,750 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
4,020,638 |
|
|
|
1,068,112 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
20,355,000 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
18,218,776 |
|
|
|
2,136,224 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On September 30, 2009, a Registration Statement on Form S-3 relating to the offering and sale from
time to time by the members of HFF Holdings of such 20,355,000 shares of Class A common stock
became effective. At September 30, 2010, 18,218,776 partnership units in each of the Operating
Partnerships beneficially owned by members of HFF Holdings immediately following the Reorganization
Transactions had been exchanged for an equal amount of shares of HFF, Inc.s Class A common stock
pursuant to the Exchange Right. After giving effect to these changes, HFF Holdings owned 5.8% of
the Operating Partnerships at September 30, 2010.
If all of the remaining partnership units held by HFF Holdings were exchanged for shares of Class A
common stock of HFF, Inc. on September 30, 2010, 2,136,224 shares of Class A common stock with a
fair value of $19.8 million would be issued and 36,944,798 shares of Class A common stock would be
outstanding.
As a result of the Reorganization Transactions, HFF Holdings was issued one share of the Companys
Class B common stock. Class B common stock has no economic rights but entitles the holder to a
number of votes that is equal to the total number of shares of Class A common stock for which the
partnership units that HFF Holdings holds in the Operating Partnerships are exchangeable.
14. Stockholders Equity
The Company is authorized to issue 175,000,000 shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, and one share of Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share. Each share of Class A
common stock entitles its holder to one vote on all matters to be voted on by stockholders
generally. HFF Holdings has been issued one share of Class B common stock. Class B common stock has
no economic rights but entitles the holder to a number of votes equal to the total number of shares
of Class A common stock for which the partnership units that HFF Holdings holds in the Operating
Partnerships, as of the relevant record date for the HFF, Inc. stockholder action, are
exchangeable. Holders of Class A and Class B common stock vote together as a single class on all
matters presented to our stockholders for their vote or approval. The Company has issued 34,908,300
and 17,263,281 shares of Class A common stock and 1 share of Class B common stock as of September
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
19
15. Earnings Per Share
The Companys net income and weighted average shares outstanding for the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 consist of the following (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
4,456 |
|
|
$ |
1,289 |
|
|
$ |
12,231 |
|
|
$ |
(3,526 |
) |
Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest |
|
$ |
3,989 |
|
|
$ |
(39 |
) |
|
$ |
6,611 |
|
|
$ |
(2,282 |
) |
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
34,887,377 |
|
|
|
16,599,358 |
|
|
|
24,206,700 |
|
|
|
16,588,043 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
34,894,309 |
|
|
|
16,599,421 |
|
|
|
24,212,421 |
|
|
|
16,588,043 |
|
The calculations of basic and diluted net income per share amounts for the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 are described and presented below.
Basic Net Income per Share
Numerator net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest for the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Denominator the weighted average shares of Class A common stock for the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, including 78,803 and 71,574 restricted stock units that
have vested and whose issuance is no longer contingent as of September 30, 2010 and September 30,
2009, respectively.
Diluted Net Income per Share
Numerator net (loss) income attributable to controlling interest for the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 as in the basic net income per share calculation
described above plus income (loss) allocated to noncontrolling interest holder upon assumed
exercise of the Exchange Right.
Denominator the weighted average shares of Class A common stock for the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, including 78,803 and 71,574 restricted stock units that
have vested and whose issuance is no longer contingent as of September 30, 2010 and September 30,
2009, respectively, plus the dilutive effect of the unrestricted stock units, stock options, and
the issuance of Class A common stock upon exercise of the Exchange Right by HFF Holdings.
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Basic Earnings Per Share of Class A Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest |
|
$ |
3,989 |
|
|
$ |
(39 |
) |
|
$ |
6,611 |
|
|
$ |
(2,282 |
) |
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares of Class A common stock
outstanding |
|
|
34,887,377 |
|
|
|
16,599,358 |
|
|
|
24,206,700 |
|
|
|
16,588,043 |
|
Basic net income per share of Class A common stock |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
Diluted Earnings Per Share of Class A Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest |
|
$ |
467 |
|
|
$ |
(39 |
) |
|
$ |
5,620 |
|
|
$ |
(2,282 |
) |
Adddilutive effect of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income allocated to noncontrolling interest holder upon
assumed exercise of exchange right |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of shares of Class A common stock |
|
|
34,887,377 |
|
|
|
16,599,358 |
|
|
|
24,206,700 |
|
|
|
16,588,043 |
|
Adddilutive effect of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested restricted stock units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
6,932 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
5,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest holder Exchange Right |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
34,894,309 |
|
|
|
16,599,421 |
|
|
|
24,212,421 |
|
|
|
16,588,043 |
|
Diluted earnings per share of Class A common stock |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
16. Related Party Transactions
The Company made payments on behalf of two affiliates of $454 and $67,218, respectively, during the
nine month period ended September 30, 2010. The Company made payments on behalf of two affiliates
of $454 and $34,957, respectively, during the nine month period ended September 30, 2009. The
Company had a net receivable from affiliates of approximately $14,000 at September 30, 2010 and a
net payable to affiliates of approximately $54,000 at December 31, 2009.
As a result of the Companys initial public offering, the Company entered into a tax receivable
agreement with HFF Holdings that provides for the payment by the Company to HFF Holdings of 85% of
the amount of the cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax that the
Company actually realizes as a result of the increase in tax basis of the assets owned by HFF LP
and HFF Securities and as a result of certain other tax benefits arising from entering into the tax
receivable agreement and making payments under that agreement. The Company will retain the
remaining 15% of cash savings, if any, in income tax that it realizes. For purposes of the tax
receivable agreement, cash savings in income tax will be computed by comparing the Companys actual
income tax liability to the amount of such taxes that it would have been required to pay had there
been no increase to the tax basis of the assets of HFF LP and HFF Securities allocable to the
Company as a result of the initial sale and later exchanges and had the Company not entered into
the tax receivable agreement. The term of the tax receivable agreement commenced upon consummation
of the offering and will continue until all such tax benefits have been utilized or have expired.
See Note 12 for further information regarding the tax receivable agreement and Note 17 for the
amount recorded in relation to this agreement.
17. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is obligated, pursuant to its tax receivable agreement with HFF Holdings, to pay to HFF
Holdings 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax
that the Company actually realizes as a result of the increases in tax basis under Section 754 and
as a result of certain other tax benefits arising from the Company entering into the tax receivable
agreement and making payments under that agreement. The Company has recorded $147.1 million for
this obligation to HFF Holdings as a liability on the consolidated balance sheet as of September
30, 2010.
In recent years, the Company has entered into arrangements with newly hired producers whereby these
producers would be paid additional compensation if certain performance targets are met over a
defined period. These payments will be made to the producers only if they enter into an employment
agreement at the end of the performance period. Payments under these arrangements, if earned,
would be paid in fiscal years 2012 through 2014. Currently, the Company cannot reasonably estimate
the amounts that would be payable under these arrangements. The Company begins to accrue for these
payments when it is deemed probable that payments will
21
be made; therefore, on a quarterly basis, the Company evaluates the probability of each of the
producers achieving the performance targets and the probability of each of the producers signing an
employment agreements. As of September 30, 2010, no accrual has been made for these arrangements.
18. Subsequent Events
On
October 28, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company approved
the reinstatement to the December 31, 2008
levels of the salaries for the Companys chief executive
officer, production members of the
Operating Committee of the Companys wholly-owned subsidiary, HFF Partnership Holdings LLC, and the
Companys office heads, effective October 1, 2010. These salaries were previously reduced and/or
eliminated on April 1, 2009. The estimated incremental annual cost for the reinstatement of these
salaries is approximately $1.7 million.
22
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion summarizes the financial position of HFF, Inc. and its subsidiaries
as of September 30, 2010, and the results of our operations for the three and nine month periods
ended September 30, 2010, and should be read in conjunction with (i) the unaudited consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and
(ii) the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes to our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Overview
Our Business
We are one of the leading providers of commercial real estate and capital markets services to
the U.S. commercial real estate industry based on transaction volume and are one of the largest
full-service commercial real estate financial intermediaries in the country.
Substantially all of our revenues are in the form of capital markets services fees collected
from our clients, usually negotiated on a transaction-by-transaction basis. We also earn fees from
commercial loan servicing activities. We believe that our multiple product offerings, diverse
client mix, expertise in a wide range of property types and national platform have the potential to
create a diversified revenue stream.
We operate in one reportable segment, the commercial real estate financial intermediary
segment and offer debt placement, investment sales, distressed debt and real estate owned advisory
service, structured finance, equity placement, investment banking services, loan sales and
commercial loan servicing.
Our business may be significantly affected by factors outside of our control, particularly
including:
|
|
Economic and commercial real estate market downturns. Our business is dependent on
international and domestic economic conditions and the demand for commercial real estate and
related services in the markets in which we operate. A slow down, a significant downturn
and/or recession in either the global economy and/or the domestic economy, including but not
limited to even a regional economic downturn, could adversely affect our business. A general
decline in acquisition and disposition activity can lead to a reduction in fees and
commissions for arranging such transactions, as well as in fees and commissions for arranging
financing for acquirers and property owners that are seeking to recapitalize their existing
properties. Likewise, a general decline in commercial real estate investment activity can lead
to a reduction in fees and commissions for arranging acquisitions, dispositions and financings
for acquisitions as well as for recapitalizations for existing property owners. Such a
general decline can also lead to a significant reduction in our loan servicing activities, due
to increased delinquencies and defaults and lack of additional loans that we would have
otherwise added to our loan servicing portfolio. |
|
|
Global and domestic credit and liquidity issues. Global and domestic credit and liquidity
issues have recently led to an economic downturn, including, but not limited to, a commercial
real estate market downturn. This downturn has in turn led to a decrease in transaction
activity and lower values, which decreased activity and values relative to historical norms in
periods prior to 2008 are expected to continue for the foreseeable future. The recent
situation in the global credit markets whereby many world governments (including but not
limited to the U.S. where the Company transacts virtually all of its business) have had to
take unprecedented and uncharted steps to either support the financial institutions in their
respective countries from collapse or take direct ownership of the same is unprecedented in
the Companys history. Restrictions on the availability of capital, both debt and/or equity,
have created significant reductions and could further reduce the liquidity in and flow of
capital to the commercial real estate markets. These restrictions could also cause commercial
real estate prices to decrease due to the reduced amount of equity capital and debt financing
available. In particular, global and domestic credit and liquidity issues may reduce the
number of acquisitions, dispositions and loan originations, as well as the respective number
of transactions and transaction volumes, which could also adversely affect our capital markets
services revenues including our servicing revenue. |
|
|
Decreased investment allocation to commercial real estate class. Allocations to commercial
real estate as an asset class for investment portfolio diversification may decrease for a
number of reasons beyond our control, including but not limited to poor performance of the
asset class relative to other asset classes or superior performance of other asset classes
when compared with continued good performance of the commercial real estate asset class, or
the poor performance of all assets classes. In addition, |
23
|
|
while commercial real estate is now viewed as an accepted and valid class for portfolio
diversification, if this perception changes, there could be a significant reduction in the amount
of debt and equity capital available in the commercial real estate sector. In particular,
reductions in debt and/or equity allocations to commercial real estate may reduce the number of
acquisitions, dispositions and loan originations, as well as the respective number of
transactions and transaction volumes, which could also adversely affect our capital markets
services revenues including our servicing revenue. |
|
|
Fluctuations in interest rates. Significant fluctuations in interest rates, as well as steady
and protracted movements of interest rates in one direction (increases or decreases), could
adversely affect the operation and income of commercial real estate properties as well as the
demand from investors for commercial real estate investments. Both of these events could
adversely affect investor demand and the supply of capital for debt and equity investments in
commercial real estate. In particular, increased interest rates may cause prices to decrease
due to the increased costs of obtaining financing and could lead to decreases in purchase and
sale activities, thereby reducing the amounts of investment sales and loan originations and
related servicing fees. If our investment sales origination and servicing businesses are
negatively impacted, it is likely that our other lines of business would also suffer due to
the relationship among our various capital markets services. |
The factors discussed above have adversely affected and continue to be a risk to our business
as evidenced by the effects of the significant ongoing disruptions in the global capital and credit
markets, and in particular the domestic capital markets. In particular, the global and domestic
credit and liquidity issues, coupled with the global and domestic economic recession/slow down,
reduced in 2008 and 2009, and may continue to reduce, the number of acquisitions, dispositions and
loan originations, as well as the respective number of transactions and transaction volumes
relative to historic norms. This has had, and may continue to have, a significant adverse effect on
our capital markets services revenues, especially relative to historic norms. The significant
balance sheet issues of many of the CMBS lenders, banks, life insurance companies, captive finance
companies and other financial institutions have adversely affected, and will likely continue to
adversely affect, the flow of commercial mortgage debt to the U.S. capital markets, especially
relative to historic norms and, in turn, have adversely affected and can potentially continue to
adversely affect all of our capital markets services platforms and resulting revenues.
The recent economic slowdown and domestic and global recession also continue to be a risk, not
only due to the potential negative adverse impacts on the performance of U.S. commercial real
estate markets, but also to the ability of lenders and equity investors to generate significant
funds to continue to make loans and equity available to the commercial real estate market,
especially in the U.S. where we operate.
Other factors that may adversely affect our business are discussed under the heading
Forward-Looking Statements and under the caption Risk Factors in this Quarterly Report on Form
10- Q.
24
Results of Operations
Following is a discussion of our results of operations for the three months ended September
30, 2010 and September 30, 2009. The table included in the period comparisons below provides
summaries of our results of operations. The period-to-period comparisons of financial results are
not necessarily indicative of future results. For a description of the key financial measures and
indicators included in our consolidated financial statements, refer to the discussion under
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Key
Financial Measures and Indicators in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands, unless percentages) |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital markets services revenue |
|
$ |
36,758 |
|
|
|
98.0 |
% |
|
$ |
19,483 |
|
|
|
94.5 |
% |
|
$ |
17,275 |
|
|
|
88.7 |
% |
Interest on mortgage notes receivable |
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
(279 |
) |
|
|
(35.2 |
)% |
Other |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
(35.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
37,490 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
20,612 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
16,878 |
|
|
|
81.9 |
% |
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services |
|
|
21,100 |
|
|
|
56.3 |
% |
|
|
12,185 |
|
|
|
59.1 |
% |
|
|
8,915 |
|
|
|
73.2 |
% |
Personnel |
|
|
3,184 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
1,425 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
1,759 |
|
|
|
123.4 |
% |
Occupancy |
|
|
1,807 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
1,942 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
(7.0 |
)% |
Travel and entertainment |
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
48.9 |
% |
Supplies, research and printing |
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
139.3 |
% |
Other |
|
|
3,678 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
|
3,252 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
% |
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
31,574 |
|
|
|
84.2 |
% |
|
|
19,772 |
|
|
|
95.9 |
% |
|
|
11,802 |
|
|
|
59.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
5,916 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
% |
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
5,076 |
|
|
|
604.3 |
% |
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
1,636 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
77.8 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
)% |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(76.5 |
)% |
Decrease in payable under tax receivable agreement |
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
1,694 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
% |
|
|
(888 |
) |
|
|
(52.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
8,346 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
% |
|
|
3,403 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
% |
|
|
4,943 |
|
|
|
145.3 |
% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
3,890 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
2,114 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
1,776 |
|
|
|
84.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
4,456 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
1,289 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
3,167 |
|
|
|
245.7 |
% |
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
1,328 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
(861 |
) |
|
|
(64.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest |
|
$ |
3,989 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
$ |
(39 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
|
$ |
4,028 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM Not Meaningful
Revenues. Our total revenues were $37.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010
compared to $20.6 million for the same period in 2009, an increase of $16.9 million, or 81.9%.
Revenues increased primarily as a result of a 106% increase in production volumes and related
revenues in several of our capital markets services platforms. A portion of the 106% increase in
production volume was achieved due to one unusually large investment sale and related debt placement
transaction which closed during the third quarter of 2010. If this transaction was excluded, our
production volume would have increased by 66% as compared to the third quarter of 2009.
|
|
The revenues we generated from capital markets services for the three months ended September
30, 2010 increased $17.3 million, or 88.7%, to $36.8 million from $19.5 million for the same
period in 2009. The increase is primarily attributable to an increase in both the number and
the average dollar value of transactions closed during the third quarter of 2010 compared to
the third quarter of 2009. |
|
|
The revenues derived from interest on mortgage notes receivable were $0.5 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $0.8 million for the same period in 2009, a
decrease of $0.3 million. Revenues decreased primarily as a result of a decrease in
originations during the third quarter of 2010 compared to the third quarter of 2009. |
25
|
|
The other revenues we earned, which consist of expense reimbursements from clients related to
out-of-pocket costs incurred and vary on a transaction-by-transaction basis, were
approximately $0.2 million for the three month period ended September 30, 2010 and $0.3
million for the three month period ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of $0.1 million, or
35.1%. |
Total Operating Expenses. Our total operating expenses were $31.6 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2010 compared to $19.8 million for the same period in 2009, an increase of
$11.8 million, or 59.7%. Expenses increased primarily due to increased cost of services due to an
increase in capital markets services revenue and increased personnel costs primarily due to an
increase in revenue.
|
|
The cost of services for the three months ended September 30, 2010 increased $8.9 million, or
73.2%, to $21.1 million from $12.2 million for the same period in 2009. The increase is
primarily the result of the increase in commissions and other incentive compensation directly
related to the increase in capital markets services revenues. Cost of services as a
percentage of capital markets services revenues was approximately 57.4% and 62.5% for the
three month periods ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively. This
percentage decrease is primarily attributable to the fixed portion of cost of services, such
as salaries for our analysts and fringe benefit costs, being spread over a higher revenue
base. |
|
|
Personnel expenses that are not directly attributable to providing services to our clients
for the three months ended September 30, 2010 increased $1.8 million, or 123.4%, to $3.2
million from $1.4 million for the same period in 2009. The increase is primarily related to an
increase in profit participation expense resulting from the higher operating income during the
three months ended September 30, 2010. |
The stock compensation cost, included in personnel expenses, which has been charged against
income was $0.1 and $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. At September 30, 2010, there was approximately $0.5 million of unrecognized
compensation cost related to share based awards. The weighted average remaining contractual term
of the nonvested restricted stock units is 1.3 years as of September 30, 2010. The weighted
average remaining contractual term of the nonvested options is 11.0 years as of September 30,
2010.
|
|
Occupancy, travel and entertainment, and supplies, research and printing expenses for the
three months ended September 30, 2010 increased $0.7 million, or 24.1%, to $3.6 million
compared to the same period in 2009. These increases are primarily due to increased supplies,
research and printing and travel and entertainment costs stemming from the increase in capital
markets services revenues. |
|
|
Other expenses, including costs for insurance, professional fees, depreciation and
amortization, interest on our warehouse line of credit and other operating expenses, were $3.7
million in the three months ended September 30, 2010, an increase of $0.4 million, or 13.1%,
versus $3.3 million in the three months ended September 30, 2009. This increase is primarily
related to increased professional fees of $0.2 million and other operating expenses of $0.3
million offset by a decrease in interest on warehouse lines of credit of $0.1 million due to
the decreased originations of Freddie Mac loans. |
Net Income. Our net income for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was $4.5 million, an
increase of $3.2 million versus $1.3 million for the same fiscal period in 2009. We attribute this
increase to several factors, with the most significant cause being the increase of revenues of
$16.9 million. Contributing to our higher net income was increased interest and other income, net
and decreased interest expense which was offset by increased income tax expense.
|
|
Interest and other income, net for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was $1.6
million, an increase of $0.7 million as compared to $0.9 million for the same fiscal period in
2009. This increase is primarily due to recognizing a $0.3 million gain on the sale of
servicing rights on certain Freddie Mac loans that we service. |
|
|
The interest expense we incurred in the three months ended September 30, 2010 totaled
$12,000, a decrease of $39,000 from $51,000 of expenses incurred in the three months ended
September 30, 2009. |
|
|
The decrease in the payable under the tax receivable agreement of $0.8 million and $1.7
million for the three month period ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, primarily
reflects the decrease in the estimated tax benefits owned to HFF Holdings under the tax
receivable agreement. This decrease in tax benefits owed to HFF Holdings represents 85% of
the decrease in the related deferred tax asset of $0.9 million and $2.0 million for 2010 and
2009, respectively. |
26
|
|
Income tax expense was approximately $3.9 million for the three months ended September 30,
2010, as compared to $2.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2009. This increase
is primarily due to the increase in net operating income experienced during the three months
ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period of the prior year. During the three
months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recorded a current income tax expense of $0.1
million and deferred income tax expense of $3.8 million. Our effective tax rate, after
adjusting pre-tax income (loss) to remove the portion attributable to non controlling
interest, was 49.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to 101.5% for
the three months ended September 30, 2009. The changes in our provision for income taxes and
our effective tax rate were primarily the result of the increase in taxable income during the
three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009
and the impact of the change in tax rates used to value the deferred tax assets. |
Following is a discussion of our results of operations for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 and September 30, 2009. The table included in the period comparisons below provides summaries
of our results of operations. The period-to-period comparisons of financial results are not
necessarily indicative of future results. For a description of the key financial measures and
indicators included in our consolidated financial statements, refer to the discussion under
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Key
Financial Measures and Indicators in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands, unless percentages) |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital markets services revenue |
|
$ |
89,196 |
|
|
|
98.0 |
% |
|
$ |
46,381 |
|
|
|
92.3 |
% |
|
$ |
42,815 |
|
|
|
92.3 |
% |
Interest on mortgage notes receivable |
|
|
1,215 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
2,392 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
(1,177 |
) |
|
|
(49.2 |
)% |
Other |
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
(875 |
) |
|
|
(58.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
91,036 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
50,273 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
40,763 |
|
|
|
81.1 |
% |
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services |
|
|
52,058 |
|
|
|
57.2 |
% |
|
|
33,069 |
|
|
|
65.8 |
% |
|
|
18,989 |
|
|
|
57.4 |
% |
Personnel |
|
|
8,814 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
|
4,835 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
|
3,979 |
|
|
|
82.3 |
% |
Occupancy |
|
|
5,236 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
5,707 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
(471 |
) |
|
|
(8.3 |
)% |
Travel and entertainment |
|
|
2,668 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
2,053 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
% |
Supplies, research and printing |
|
|
2,154 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
30.9 |
% |
Other |
|
|
10,046 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
10,060 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
80,976 |
|
|
|
88.9 |
% |
|
|
57,369 |
|
|
|
114.1 |
% |
|
|
23,607 |
|
|
|
41.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
10,060 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
|
(7,096 |
) |
|
|
(14.1 |
)% |
|
|
17,156 |
|
|
|
241.8 |
% |
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
7,332 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
|
3,322 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
4,010 |
|
|
|
120.7 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
(373 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
)% |
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
(86.3 |
)% |
Increase in payable under the tax receivable agreement |
|
|
798 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
1,694 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
(896 |
) |
|
|
(52.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
18,139 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
|
(2,453 |
) |
|
|
(4.9 |
)% |
|
|
20,592 |
|
|
|
839.5 |
% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
5,908 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
1,073 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
4,835 |
|
|
|
450.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
12,231 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
% |
|
|
(3,526 |
) |
|
|
(7.0 |
)% |
|
|
15,757 |
|
|
|
446.9 |
% |
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
5,620 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
(1,244 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
)% |
|
|
6,864 |
|
|
|
551.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest |
|
$ |
6,611 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
$ |
(2,282 |
) |
|
|
(4.5 |
)% |
|
$ |
8,893 |
|
|
|
389.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM Not Meaningful
Revenues. Our total revenues were $91.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
compared to $50.3 million for the same period in 2009, an increase of $40.8 million, or 81.1%.
Revenues increased primarily as a result of a 154% increase in production volumes and related
revenues in several of our capital markets services platforms. A portion of the 154% increase in
production volume was achieved due to one unusually large investment sales portfolio transaction, and the
related debt placement for the buyer of the portfolio, and one
unusually large investment sale and related
debt placement transaction which closed during the first nine months of 2010. If these
transactions were excluded, our production volume would have increased by 95% as compared to the
first nine months of 2009.
|
|
The revenues we generated from capital markets services for the nine months ended September
30, 2010 increased $42.8 million, or 92.3%, to $89.2 million from $46.4 million for the same
period in 2009. The increase is primarily attributable to an increase in |
27
|
|
both the number and the average dollar value of transactions closed during the first nine months
of 2010 compared to the first nine months of 2009. |
|
|
The revenues derived from interest on mortgage notes receivable were $1.2 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $2.4 million for the same period in 2009, a
decrease of $1.2 million. Revenues decreased primarily as a result of a decrease in
originations in the first nine months of 2010 compared to the first nine months of 2009. |
|
|
The other revenues we earned, which consist of expense reimbursements from clients related to
out-of-pocket costs incurred and vary on a transaction-by-transaction basis, were $0.6 million
for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 and $1.5 million for the nine month period
ended September 30, 2009. |
Total Operating Expenses. Our total operating expenses were $81.0 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 compared to $57.4 million for the same period in 2009, an increase of
$23.6 million, or 41.1%. Expenses increased primarily due to increased cost of services, personnel
costs and travel and entertainment costs as a result of the increase in capital markets services
revenue. These cost increases were slightly offset by decreased occupancy cost and lower interest
on our warehouse line of credit.
|
|
The cost of services for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 increased $19.0 million, or
57.4%, to $52.1 million from $33.1 million for the same period in 2009. The increase is
primarily the result of the increase in commissions and other incentive compensation directly
related to the increase in capital markets services revenues. Slightly offsetting this
increase in costs was the impact of our cost saving initiatives in reduced headcount and the
suspension of the Companys 401(k) matching contribution from April 1, 2009 through August 31,
2010. Cost of services as a percentage of capital markets services revenues was approximately
58.4% and 71.3% for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009,
respectively. This percentage decrease is primarily attributable to the fixed portion of cost
of services, such as salaries for our analysts and fringe benefit costs, being spread over a
higher revenue base. |
|
|
Personnel expenses that are not directly attributable to providing services to our clients
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 increased $4.0 million, or 82.3%, to $8.8 million
from $4.8 million for the same period in 2009. The increase is primarily related to an
increase in profit participation expense resulting from the higher operating income during the
nine months ended September 30, 2010. |
|
|
The stock compensation cost, included in personnel expenses, which has been charged against
income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $0.5 million as compared to $0.9 million
for the same period in 2009. At September 30, 2010, there was approximately $0.5 million of
unrecognized compensation cost related to share based awards. The weighted average remaining
contractual term of the nonvested restricted stock units is 1.3 years as of September 30, 2010.
The weighted average remaining contractual term of the nonvested options is 11.0 years as of
September 30, 2010. |
|
|
Occupancy, travel and entertainment, and supplies, research and printing expenses for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 increased $0.7 million, or 6.9%, to $10.1 million
compared to the same period in 2009. |
|
|
Other expenses, including costs for insurance, professional fees, depreciation and
amortization, interest on our warehouse line of credit and other operating expenses, were
approximately $10.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010, a decrease of $0.1
million, or 0.1%, versus $10.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009. This
decrease was primarily due to the decreased interest on our warehouse lines of credit
supporting our Freddie Mac loan business partially offset by increases in professional fees,
other operating expenses and depreciation and amortization. |
Net Income (Loss). Our net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $12.2
million, an increase of $15.8 million versus a net loss of $3.5 million for the same fiscal period
in 2009. We attribute this increase to several factors, with the most significant cause being an
increase of revenues of $40.8 million.
|
|
Interest and other income, net for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $7.3
million, an increase of $4.0 million as compared to $3.3 million for the same fiscal period in
2009. This increase is primarily due to recognizing a $2.7 million gain on the sale of
servicing rights and other income of $1.2 million on certain loans that we service partially
offset by lower interest income earned on our cash balances. |
|
|
The interest expense we incurred in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 totaled $51,000,
a decrease of $0.3 million from $0.4 million of similar expenses incurred in the nine months
ended September 30, 2009. This decrease is primarily due to the |
28
|
|
recording of certain previously unrecorded commitment fees on the unused amount of credit on our
Amended Credit Agreement. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company corrected
an error related to previously unrecorded commitment fees on its unused line of credit and
recorded $230,000 of interest expense that represented the cumulative amount of commitment fees
for the period from February 5, 2007 to December 31, 2008 and recorded an additional $90,000 of
expense related to the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The prior period correction was not
considered material to restate prior period financial statements. |
|
|
The decrease in the payable under the tax receivable agreement of $0.8 million and $1.7
million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, primarily
reflects the decrease in the estimated tax benefits owned to HFF Holdings under the tax
receivable agreement. This decrease in tax benefits owed to HFF Holdings represents 85% of
the decrease in the related deferred tax asset of $0.9 million and $2.0 million for 2010 and
2009, respectively. |
|
|
Income tax expense was approximately $5.9 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010, an increase of approximately $4.8 million as compared to $1.1 million in the nine months
ended September 30, 2009. This increase is primarily due to the increase in net operating
income experienced during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period
in the prior year. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recorded a
current income tax expense of $0.2 million and a deferred income tax expense of $5.7 million.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded a current income tax
expense of $0.5 million and a deferred income tax expense of $0.5 million. Our effective tax
rate, after adjusting pre-tax income (loss) to remove the portion attributable to non
controlling interest, was 47.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to
87.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The changes in our provision for income
taxes and our effective tax rate were primarily the result of sizeable income reported for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 versus a loss reported for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. |
Financial Condition
Total assets increased to $259.4 million at September 30, 2010, from $223.6 million at
December 31, 2009, primarily due to:
|
|
An increase in cash and cash equivalents of $20.3 million primarily due to the increase in
net income and working capital. |
|
|
An increase in deferred tax assets of $42.7 million, primarily due to the step-up in basis
from the exchanges of partnership units of the Operating Partnerships that occurred during the
first nine months of 2010 of $48.4 million which was offset by deferred income tax expense of
$5.7 million. |
|
|
An increase in accounts receivable, net of $0.6 million due to the timing of collections. |
These increases were partially offset by a decrease in mortgage notes receivable of $27.8
million due to a lower balance of loans pending sale to Freddie Mac at September 30, 2010, compared
to December 31, 2009.
Total liabilities increased to $174.8 million at September 30, 2010, from $156.6 million at
December 31, 2009, primarily due to:
|
|
An increase in payable under the tax receivable agreement of $41.6 million due to a step-up
in basis from the partnership unit exchanges that occurred during the first six months of
2010. |
|
|
An increase in accrued compensation and related taxes of $6.0 million primarily due to the
increased production volumes and operating income. |
This increase was partially offset by a $27.8 million decrease in the warehouse lines of
credit due to a lower balance of loans pending sale to Freddie Mac at September 30, 2010, compared
to December 31, 2009 and a decrease in other current liabilities caused by lower balances of client
escrow funds.
Cash Flows
Our historical cash flows are primarily related to the timing of receipt of transaction fees,
the timing of distributions to members of HFF Holdings and payment of commissions and bonuses to
employees.
29
First Nine Months of 2010
Cash and cash equivalents increased $20.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Net cash of $21.8 million was provided by operating activities, primarily resulting from a $12.2
million net income, $3.0 million proceeds from the sale of mortgage servicing rights and a $6.0
million increase in accrued compensation and related taxes. These increases of cash were partially
offset by the increase in accounts receivable, net of $0.6 million and decrease in other accrued
liabilities of $0.9 million. Cash of $0.2 million was used for investing in property and
equipment. Financing activities used $1.1 million of cash to make a tax distribution to the
noncontrolling interest holder, $0.1 million for the payments on certain capital leases and $0.1
million of cash was used to purchase shares of Class A common stock in connection with employee
withholdings.
First Nine Months of 2009
Cash and cash equivalents decreased $1.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Net cash of $1.3 million was used in operating activities, primarily resulting from a $3.5 million
net loss and a $4.0 million decrease in payable under the tax receivable agreement. These uses of
cash were partially offset by the decrease in deferred taxes of $0.5 million, proceeds from the
sale of mortgage servicing rights of $1.6 million and a decrease in prepaid taxes, prepaid expenses
and other current assets of $4.1 million. Cash of $54,000 was used for investing in property and
equipment. Financing activities used $0.1 million of cash for the payments on certain capital
leases and $0.2 million of cash was used to purchase shares of Class A common stock in connection
with employee withholdings.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our current assets typically have consisted primarily of cash and cash equivalents and
accounts receivable in relation to earned transaction fees. At September 30, 2010, our cash and
cash equivalents of approximately $61.3 million were invested or held in a mix of money market
funds, bank demand deposit accounts and three-month United States Treasury Notes at two financial
institutions. Our liabilities have typically consisted of accounts payable and accrued
compensation. We regularly monitor our liquidity position, including cash level, credit lines,
interest and payments on debt, capital expenditures and other matters relating to liquidity and to
compliance with regulatory net capital requirements. We have historically maintained a line of
credit under our revolving credit facility in excess of anticipated liquidity requirements,
although our revolving credit facility matured on February 5, 2010 and we chose not to extend it
for an additional term. We did not borrow on this revolving credit facility since its inception in
February 2007.
In accordance with the Operating Partnerships partnership agreements and approval from the
board of directors of HFF, Inc. and from GP Corp (as general partner of the Operating
Partnerships), each of the Operating Partnerships makes quarterly distributions to its partners,
including HFF, Inc., based on taxable income, if any, in an amount sufficient to cover all
applicable taxes payable by the members of HFF Holdings and by us and to cover dividends, if any,
declared by the board of directors. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Operating
Partnerships made a distribution to HFF Holdings of approximately $1.1 million. These distributions
decrease the noncontrolling interest balance on the consolidated balance sheet.
Over the nine month period ended September 30, 2010, we generated approximately $21.8 million
of cash from operations. Our short-term liquidity needs are typically related to compensation
expenses and other operating expenses such as occupancy, supplies, marketing, professional fees and
travel and entertainment. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we incurred approximately
$81.0 million in total operating expenses. A large portion of our operating expenses are variable,
highly correlated to our revenue streams and dependent on the collection of transaction fees.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, approximately 52.0% of our operating expenses were
variable expenses. Our cash flow generated from operations historically has been sufficient to
enable us to meet our objectives. However, if the economy deteriorates at the rate it did during
2008 and 2009, we may be unable to generate enough cash flow from operations to meet our operating
needs and therefore we could use all or substantially all of our existing cash reserves on hand to
support our operations. We currently believe that cash flows from operating activities and our
existing cash balance will provide adequate liquidity and are sufficient to meet our working
capital needs for the foreseeable future.
Our tax receivable agreement with HFF Holdings entered into in connection with our initial
public offering provides for the payment by us to HFF Holdings of 85% of the amount of cash
savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax that we actually realize as a result
of the increases in tax basis and as a result of certain other tax benefits arising from our
entering into the tax receivable agreement and making payments under that agreement. We have
estimated that the payments that will be made to HFF Holdings will be $147.1 million. Our liquidity
needs related to our long term obligations are primarily related to our facility leases.
Additionally, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we incurred approximately $5.2 million
in occupancy expenses and approximately $51,000 in interest expense.
30
We entered into an Amended Credit Agreement with Bank of America, N.A. in February 2007 for a
$40.0 million line of credit that was put in place contemporaneously with the consummation of the
initial public offering. The Company did not borrow on the Amended Credit Agreement from its
inception in February 2007 through its maturity date of February 5, 2010. This credit facility
expired by its terms on the maturity date of February 5, 2010, and we chose not to exercise our
extension option. The Amended Credit Agreement required payment of a commitment fee of 0.2% or
0.3% on the unused amount of credit based on the total amount outstanding. During the three months
ended June 30, 2009, we corrected an error related to previously unrecorded commitment fees on the
unused line of credit and recorded approximately $260,000 of interest expense that represented the
cumulative amount of commitment fees for the period from February 5, 2007 to March 31, 2009. This
correction was not considered material to restate prior period financial statements. HFF LP did
not borrow on this revolving credit facility during the period February 5, 2007 through February 5,
2010.
In 2005, we entered into an uncommitted financing arrangement with Red Mortgage Capital, Inc.
(Red Capital) to fund our Freddie Mac loan closings. Pursuant to this arrangement, Red Capital
funded multifamily Freddie Mac loan closings on a transaction-by-transaction basis, with each loan
being separately collateralized by a loan and mortgage on a multifamily property that is ultimately
purchased by Freddie Mac. In November 2007, we obtained an uncommitted $50.0 million financing
arrangement from The Huntington National Bank (Huntington) to supplement our Red Capital financing
arrangement. In December 2009 we entered into a Third Amended and Restated Note with Huntington
which increased our borrowing availability to $100.0 million until March 1, 2010 at which time the
arrangement decreased to $75.0 million thereafter. Huntington funds the multifamily Freddie Mac
loan closings on a transaction-by-transaction basis, with each loan being separately collateralized
by a loan and mortgage on a multifamily property that is ultimately purchased by Freddie Mac. In
December 2009, the financing arrangement with Red Capital ended, and we entered into an uncommitted
$175 million financing arrangement with PNC Bank, N.A. (PNC) to fund our Freddie Mac loan closings.
Pursuant to the PNC arrangement, PNC funds the multifamily Freddie Mac loan closings on a
transaction-by-transaction basis, with each loan being separately collateralized by a loan and
mortgage on a multifamily property that is ultimately purchased by Freddie Mac. The PNC and
Huntington financing arrangements are only for the purpose of supporting our participation in
Freddie Macs Program Plus Seller Servicer program and cannot be used for any other purpose. As of
September 30, 2010, we had outstanding borrowings of $11.0 million under the PNC/Huntington
arrangements and a corresponding amount of mortgage notes receivable. Although we believe that our
current financing arrangements with PNC and Huntington are sufficient to meet our current needs in
connection with our participation in Freddie Macs Program Plus Seller Servicer program, in the
event we are not able to secure financing for our Freddie Mac loan closings, we will cease
originating such Freddie Mac loans until we have available financing.
Critical Accounting Policies; Use of Estimates
We prepare our financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. In applying many of these accounting principles, we need to make assumptions, estimates
and/or judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses in
our consolidated financial statements. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience
and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. These assumptions,
estimates and/or judgments, however, are often subjective and our actual results may change
negatively based on changing circumstances or changes in our analyses. If actual amounts are
ultimately different from our estimates, the revisions are included in our results of operations
for the period in which the actual amounts become known. We believe the following critical
accounting policies could potentially produce materially different results if we were to change
underlying assumptions, estimates and/or judgments. See the notes to our consolidated financial
statements for a summary of our significant accounting policies.
Goodwill. We evaluate goodwill for potential impairment annually or more frequently if
circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. In this process, we make estimates and
assumptions in order to determine the fair value of the Company. In determining the fair value of
the Company for purposes of evaluating goodwill for impairment, we utilize an enterprise market
capitalization approach. In applying this approach, we use the stock price of our Class A common
stock after market close on the measurement date multiplied by the sum of current outstanding
shares as of the measurement date and an estimated control premium. As of October 29, 2010,
managements analysis indicates that the estimated fair value of the Company would need to decline
by more than 75.0% to result in the recorded goodwill being impaired and would require management
to measure the amount of the impairment charge. Goodwill is considered impaired if the recorded
book value of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill as determined under this
valuation technique. We use our best judgment and information available to us at the time to
perform this review.
Intangible Assets. Our intangible assets primarily include mortgage servicing rights under
agreements with third party lenders. Servicing rights are recorded at the lower of cost or market.
Mortgage servicing rights do not trade in an active, open market with
31
readily available observable prices. Since there is no ready market value for the mortgage
servicing rights, such as quoted market prices or prices based on sales or purchases of similar
assets, the Company determines the fair value of the mortgage servicing rights by estimating the
present value of future cash flows associated with servicing the loans. Management makes certain
assumptions and judgments in estimating the fair value of servicing rights. The estimate is based
on a number of assumptions, including the benefits of servicing (contractual servicing fees and
interest on escrow and float balances), the cost of servicing, prepayment rates (including risk of
default), an inflation rate, the expected life of the cash flows and the discount rate. The cost of
servicing, prepayment rates and discount rates are the most sensitive factors affecting the
estimated fair value of the servicing rights. Management estimates a market participants cost of
servicing by analyzing the limited market activity and considering the Companys own internal
servicing costs. Management estimates the discount rate by considering the various risks involved
in the future cash flows of the underlying loans which include the cancellation of servicing
contracts, concentration in the life company portfolio and the incremental risk related to large
loans. Management estimates the prepayment levels of the underlying mortgages by analyzing recent
historical experience. Many of the commercial loans being serviced have financial penalties for
prepayment or early payoff before the stated maturity date. As a result, the Company has
consistently experienced a low level of loan runoff. The estimated value of the servicing rights is
impacted by changes in these assumptions. As of September 30, 2010, the fair value and net book
value of the servicing rights were $11.1 million and $9.5 million, respectively. A 10%, 20% and 30%
increase in the level of assumed prepayments would decrease the estimated fair value of the
servicing rights at the stratum level by up to 1.9%, 3.7% and 5.4%, respectively. A 10%, 20% and
30% increase in cost of servicing of the servicing business would decrease the estimated fair value
of the servicing rights at the stratum level by up to 13.0%, 26.0% and 38.9%, respectively. A 10%,
20% and 30% increase in the discount rate would decrease the estimated fair value of the servicing
rights at the stratum level by up to 3.0%, 5.9% and 8.6%, respectively. The effect of a variation
in each of these assumptions on the estimated fair value of the servicing rights is calculated
independently without changing any other assumption. Servicing rights are amortized in proportion
to and over the period of estimated servicing income which results in an accelerated level of
amortization over eight years. We evaluate amortizable intangible assets on an annual basis, or
more frequently if circumstances so indicate, for potential impairment.
Income Taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and
their respective tax bases, and for tax losses and for tax credit carryforwards, if any. Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are measured using tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the
years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on
deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period
of the tax rate change. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, the Company
considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets
will not be realized.
Our effective tax rate is sensitive to several factors including changes in the mix of our
geographic profitability. We evaluate our estimated tax rate on a quarterly basis to reflect
changes in: (i) our geographic mix of income, (ii) legislative actions on statutory tax rates, and
(iii) tax planning for jurisdictions affected by double taxation. We continually seek to develop
and implement potential strategies and/or actions that would reduce our overall effective tax rate.
The net deferred tax asset of $166.8 million at September 30, 2010 is comprised mainly of a
$177.3 million deferred tax asset related to the Section 754 of the Internal Revenue Code (Section
754) election tax basis step up, net of a $20.6 million valuation allowance. The net deferred tax
asset related to the Section 754 election tax basis step up of $156.7 million represents annual tax
deductions of approximately $24.4 million through 2021, then decreasing over the next four years to
approximately $2.5 million in 2025. In order to realize the annual benefit of approximately $24.4
million, the Company needs to generate approximately $140.0 million in revenue each year, assuming
a constant cost structure. In the event that the Company cannot realize the annual benefit of
$24.4 million each year, the shortfall becomes a net operating loss that can be carried back 3
years to offset prior years taxable income, if any, or carried forward 20 years to offset future
taxable income. During 2008 and 2009, based on the decline in production volume and corresponding
impact on operating results, we have not realized the entire benefit of the annual deduction.
Currently, $12.2 million of this cumulative benefit is characterized as a net operating loss and
can be carried forward for periods that begin to expire in 2028. In evaluating the realizability of
these deferred tax assets, management makes estimates and judgments regarding the level and timing
of future taxable income, including projecting future revenue growth and changes to the cost
structure. Based on this analysis and other quantitative and qualitative factors, management
believes that it is currently more likely than not that the Company will be able to generate
sufficient taxable income to realize the net deferred tax assets. If it is more likely than not
that the Company would not be able to generate a sufficient level of taxable income through the
carryforward period, a valuation allowance would be recorded as a charge to income tax expense and
a proportional reduction would be made in the payable under the tax receivable agreement which
would be recorded as income in the consolidated statements of income. The trend in revenue growth
over the next few years and through the amortization and carryforward periods is a key factor in
assessing the realizability of the deferred tax assets.
32
Leases. The Company leases all of its facilities under operating lease agreements. These lease
agreements typically contain tenant improvement allowances. The Company records tenant improvement
allowances as a leasehold improvement asset, included in property and equipment, net in the
consolidated balance sheet, and a related deferred rent liability and amortizes them on a
straight-line basis over the shorter of the term of the lease or useful life of the asset as
additional depreciation expense and a reduction to rent expense, respectively. Lease agreements
sometimes contain rent escalation clauses or rent holidays, which are recognized on a straight-line
basis over the life of the lease in accordance with ASC 840, Leases (ASC 840). Lease terms
generally range from one to ten years. An analysis is performed on all equipment leases to
determine whether they should be classified as a capital or operating lease according to ASC 840.
Share Based Compensation. The Company estimates the grant-date fair value of stock options
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The weighted average assumptions used in the option
pricing model as of September 30, 2010 are: i) zero dividend yield, ii) expected volatility of
63.9%, iii) risk free interest rate of 3.2% and iv) expected life of 11.0 years. For restricted
stock awards, the fair value of the awards is calculated as the difference between the market value
of the Companys Class A common stock on the date of grant and the purchase price paid by the
employee. The Companys awards are generally subject to graded vesting schedules. Compensation
expense is adjusted for estimated forfeitures and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service period of the award. Forfeiture assumptions are evaluated on a quarterly basis
and updated as necessary.
Employment / Non-compete Agreements. In recent years, the Company has entered into
arrangements with newly hired producers whereby these producers would be paid additional
compensation if certain performance targets are met over a defined period. These payments will be
made to the producers only if they enter into an employment agreement at the end of the performance
period. Payments under these arrangements, if earned, would be paid in fiscal years 2012 through
2014. Currently, the Company cannot reasonably estimate the amounts that would be payable under
these arrangements. The Company begins to accrue for these payments when it is deemed probable
that payments will be made; therefore, on a quarterly basis, the Company evaluates the probability
of each of the producers achieving the performance targets and the probability of each of the
producers signing an employment agreement. As of September 30, 2010, no accrual has been made for
these arrangements. Additionally, during June 2010, in connection with the modification of the
Exchange Right, twenty-nine members of HFF Holdings agreed to extend the term of his or her
existing non-competition and non-solicitation agreement from March 2011 to March 2015.
Certain Information Concerning Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not currently invest in any off-balance sheet vehicles that provide liquidity, capital
resources, market or credit risk support, or engage in any leasing activities that expose us to any
liability that is not reflected in our consolidated financial statements.
Seasonality
Our capital markets services revenue has historically been seasonal, which can affect an
investors ability to compare our financial condition and results of operation on a
quarter-by-quarter basis. This seasonality has caused our revenue, operating income, net income and
cash flows from operating activities to be lower in the first six months of the year and higher in
the second half of the year. The typical concentration of earnings and cash flows in the last six
months of the year has historically been due to an industry-wide focus of clients to complete
transactions towards the end of the calendar year. The recent disruptions, write-offs and credit
losses in the global and domestic capital markets, the liquidity issues facing all capital markets,
especially the U.S. commercial real estate markets, as well as the U.S. and global recession in
many parts of the world has caused, and we believe will continue to cause, historical comparisons
to be even more difficult to gauge. For example, although the seasonality described above did
occur in 2009, it did not occur in 2007 or 2008.
Effect of Inflation and/or Deflation
Inflation and/or deflation, or both, could significantly affect our compensation costs,
particularly those not directly tied to our transaction professionals compensation, due to factors
such as availability of capital and/or increased costs of capital. The rise of inflation could also
significantly and adversely affect certain expenses, such as debt service costs, information
technology and occupancy costs. To the extent that inflation and/or deflation results in rising
interest rates and has other effects upon the commercial real estate markets in which we operate
and, to a lesser extent, the securities markets, it may affect our financial position and results
of
33
operations by reducing the demand for commercial real estate and related services which could
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. See Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB amended ASC 810, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (ASC 810),
which requires an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprises variable
interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. ASC
810 was effective for fiscal periods ending after November 15, 2009. The adoption of the guidance
had no impact on the Companys consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued FAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (as codified in ASC topic 860, Transfers and Servicing (ASC
860)). This update to ASC 860 removes the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and
removes the exception from applying ASC 810 to qualifying special-purpose entities. ASC 860 is
effective for fiscal periods ending after November 15, 2009. The adoption of the amended guidance
had no impact on the Company.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Due to the nature of our business and the manner in which we conduct our operations, in
particular that our financial instruments which are exposed to concentrations of credit risk
consist primarily of short-term cash deposits and investments and in light of the recent support
provided by the U.S. government related to the current credit and liquidity issues, we believe we
do not face any material interest rate risk, foreign currency exchange rate risk, equity price risk
or other market risk. The recent disruptions in the credit markets, however, have, in some cases,
resulted in an inability to access assets such as money market funds that traditionally have been
viewed as highly liquid. Although we believe that our cash and cash equivalents are deposited,
invested or placed with secure financial institutions, there is no assurance that any of these
financial institutions will not default on its obligations to us, especially given current credit
market conditions, which would adversely impact our cash and cash equivalent positions and, in
turn, our results of operations and financial condition.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
Managements Quarterly Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to the Companys management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required financial disclosure.
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, respectively) have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on this
evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as
of September 30, 2010, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide
reasonable assurance that material information required to be included in our periodic SEC reports
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in rules and
forms.
The design of any system of control is based upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of
future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated
objectives under all future events, no matter how remote, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may not deteriorate. Because of its inherent limitations, disclosure
controls and procedures may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Accordingly, even effective
disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control
objectives.
34
Changes in Internal Controls
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the three month period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
35
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings. |
We are party to various litigation matters, in most cases involving normal ordinary course and
routine claims incidental to our business. We cannot estimate with certainty our ultimate legal and
financial liability with respect to such pending matters. However, we believe, based on our
examination of such pending matters, that our ultimate liability for such matters will not have a
material adverse effect on our business or financial condition.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider
the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or
future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing
our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem
to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or
operating results.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. |
None.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities. |
None.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Removed and Reserved |
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Other Information. |
None.
A. Exhibits
31.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith). |
36
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
HFF, INC.
|
|
Dated: November 4, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ John H. Pelusi, Jr.
|
|
|
|
John H. Pelusi, Jr |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer,
Director and Executive Managing Director
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: November 4, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Gregory R. Conley
|
|
|
|
Gregory R. Conley |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
37
EXHIBIT INDEX
31.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith). |
38