e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended
March 31, 2007
Commission File No. 1-12984
EAGLE MATERIALS INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State of Incorporation)
75-2520779
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
3811 Turtle Creek Blvd, Suite 1100, Dallas, Texas 75219
(Address of principal executive offices)
(214) 432-2000
(Registrants telephone number)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
|
Common Stock (par value $.01 per share)
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule
405 of the Securities Act. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act. YES o NO þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). YES o NO þ
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the Company at September
29, 2006 (the last business day of the registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter)
was approximately $1.652 billion.
As of May 23, 2007, the number of outstanding shares of common stock was:
|
|
|
Class |
|
Outstanding Shares |
Common Stock, $.01 Par Value |
|
47,980,097 |
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Eagle Materials Inc.
to be held on August 2, 2007 are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Report.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
OVERVIEW
Eagle Materials Inc. (the Company or EXP which may be referred to as we or us) is a
manufacturer of basic building materials including gypsum wallboard, cement, gypsum and non-gypsum
paperboard and concrete and aggregates. We were founded in 1963 as a building materials subsidiary
of Centex Corporation (Centex) and we operated as a public company under the name Centex
Construction Products, Inc. from April 1994 to January 30, 2004 when Centex completed a tax free
distribution of its shares to its shareholders (the Spin-off). Since the date of the Spin-off, we
are no longer affiliated with Centex. Today, our primary businesses are the manufacture and
distribution of gypsum wallboard and the manufacture and sale of cement. Gypsum wallboard is
distributed throughout the U.S. with particular emphasis in the geographic markets nearest to our
production facilities. We sell cement in four regional markets and for the twenty-first
consecutive year we have sold 100% of our cement production capacity. At March 31, 2007 we
operated four gypsum wallboard plants (five board lines), four cement plants (six kilns, one of
which belongs to our joint venture company), one gypsum paperboard plant, nine concrete batching
plants and two aggregates facilities.
Fiscal year 2007 represented a record year for the Company in several regards, such as:
|
|
|
The highest fiscal year operating earnings in our history, due principally to
record operating earnings of both our gypsum wallboard and cement segments; |
|
|
|
|
We completed the twenty-first consecutive year of selling all of our cement
production, as well as setting a fiscal year sales record for volume with over 3.2 million
tons of cement sold; |
|
|
|
|
Completed the expansion of Illinois Cement Company on-time and under-budget;
and |
|
|
|
|
Began construction of the new greenfield wallboard plant in Georgetown, South
Carolina, which is expected to be completed and operational by December 2007. |
Over the last several years the Company has maintained the goal of pursuing strategic growth
opportunities through expansion or acquisition, while continuing to be a low cost producer. During
fiscal 2007, the Company focused on the following goals:
Expanding our Wallboard Operation:
The Company began construction in March 2006 of a new $150 million wallboard plant in
Georgetown, South Carolina, which will utilize synthetic gypsum as our primary raw material.
Construction is currently on-time and on-budget, and is expected to be completed and operational in
December 2007. The new wallboard plant is expected to add 750 million square feet of production
capacity to our gypsum wallboard segment.
Expanding on Our Existing Asset Position in Our Cement Business:
|
|
|
We completed the $65 million expansion of Illinois Cement Company, increasing
clinker capacity 70% to 1.0 million tons. The expansion was completed in December 2006 and
became fully operational in January 2007. |
|
|
|
|
The Company is developing its plans to expand and modernize our Nevada Cement
Company plant and our Mountain Cement Company plant. The plans will expand the per plant
production capacity of Nevada Cement Company and Mountain Cement Company to 1.0 million
tons each of clinker annually representing an increase in production of 60% and 100%,
respectively. We anticipate beginning the modernization of the plants during the first
half of calendar 2008, with the completion of Nevada Cement expected to be in mid calendar
2009 and the completion of Mountain Cement to be in late calendar 2009. We anticipate
investing a total of approximately $320 million for both projects. |
1
|
|
|
After the completion of the modernization and expansions of our Nevada Cement
and Mountain Cement plants, along with the Illinois Cement expansion, our total net clinker
capacity is expected to increase by 50% to 3.7 million tons per year and our total cement
capacity is expected to increase to approximately 4.1 million tons per year. |
We continue to be committed to our goal of being a low cost producer in each of the markets in
which we compete through disciplined investment and engineered operational execution. We will also
continue to focus on expansion of our geographic footprint through acquisition or expansion of
existing facilities that provide increased profitability for our shareholders.
INDUSTRY SEGMENT INFORMATION
For management and financial reporting purposes, our businesses are separated into four
segments: Gypsum Wallboard; Cement; Recycled Paperboard; and Concrete and Aggregates. A
description of these business segments can be found on pages 3 - 12.
The following table presents revenues and earnings before interest and income taxes
contributed by each of our industry segments during the periods indicated. We conduct one of our
four cement plant operations through a joint venture, Texas Lehigh Cement Company LP, which is
located in Buda, Texas. The Company owns a 50% interest in the joint venture and accounts for its
interest using the equity method of accounting. However, for segment reporting purposes, we
proportionately consolidate our 50% share of the cement joint ventures revenues and operating
earnings, which is consistent with the way management organizes the segments within the Company for
making operating decisions and assessing performance. Prior to January 11, 2005, we reported our
50% interest in the Illinois Cement Company consistent with that of Texas Lehigh Cement Company.
Consequently, the information presented below and for the remainder of this Form 10-K includes the
50% interest in Illinois Cement through January 10, 2005 (the date we acquired the other 50%) and
our 100% interest in Illinois Cement for the period from January 11, 2005 through March 31, 2005,
and for all of fiscal 2006 and 2007. Identifiable assets, depreciation, depletion and
amortization, and capital expenditures by segment are presented in Note (G) of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 50 - 53.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gypsum Wallboard |
|
$ |
511.6 |
|
|
$ |
479.1 |
|
|
$ |
350.1 |
|
Cement |
|
|
321.9 |
|
|
|
285.3 |
|
|
|
211.3 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
127.5 |
|
|
|
133.5 |
|
|
|
125.2 |
|
Concrete and Aggregates |
|
|
97.3 |
|
|
|
89.8 |
|
|
|
70.8 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
1,062.8 |
|
|
|
990.0 |
|
|
|
757.6 |
|
Less: Intersegment Revenues |
|
|
(63.9 |
) |
|
|
(65.1 |
) |
|
|
(58.8 |
) |
Less: Joint Ventures Revenues |
|
|
(76.5 |
) |
|
|
(65.2 |
) |
|
|
(82.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Revenues |
|
$ |
922.4 |
|
|
$ |
859.7 |
|
|
$ |
616.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
Operating Earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gypsum Wallboard |
|
$ |
198.1 |
|
|
$ |
154.2 |
|
|
$ |
81.6 |
|
Cement |
|
|
92.2 |
|
|
|
78.3 |
|
|
|
57.6 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
Concrete and Aggregates |
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
330.0 |
|
|
|
263.7 |
|
|
|
171.6 |
|
Corporate Overhead |
|
|
(20.3 |
) |
|
|
(16.4 |
) |
|
|
(10.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Before Interest and Income Taxes |
|
$ |
309.7 |
|
|
$ |
247.3 |
|
|
$ |
161.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues (net of joint venture and intersegment revenue, see Note (G) of the Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements) for the past three years from each of our business segments,
expressed as a percentage of total net revenues were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Percentage of Total Net Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gypsum Wallboard |
|
|
55.5 |
% |
|
|
55.8 |
% |
|
|
56.8 |
% |
Cement |
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
Concrete and Aggregates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Readymix Concrete |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
Aggregates |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Revenues |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GYPSUM WALLBOARD OPERATIONS
Company Operations. We currently own and operate four gypsum wallboard manufacturing
facilities, and are constructing a fifth wallboard facility in Georgetown, South Carolina which we
expect will become operational during December 2007. There are four primary steps in the
manufacturing process: (1) gypsum is mined and extracted from the ground; (2) the gypsum is then
calcined and converted into plaster; (3) the plaster is mixed with various other materials and
water to produce a mixture known as slurry, which is extruded between two continuous sheets of
recycled paperboard on a high-speed production line and allowed to harden; and (4) the sheets of
gypsum wallboard are then cut to appropriate lengths, dried and bundled for sale. Gypsum wallboard
is used to finish the interior walls and ceilings in residential, commercial and industrial
construction.
3
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our plants:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Gypsum |
|
Estimated Minimum |
|
|
|
|
Wallboard Capacity |
|
Gypsum |
|
Estimated Gypsum |
Location |
|
(MMSF)(1) |
|
Rock Reserves (years) |
|
Reserve (million tons) |
Albuquerque, New Mexico |
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
50+ |
(2)(3) |
|
|
39 |
(2) |
Bernalillo, New Mexico |
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
50+ |
(2)(3) |
|
|
39 |
(2) |
Gypsum, Colorado |
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
25 |
(4) |
|
|
15 |
|
Duke, Oklahoma |
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
29 |
(4)(5) |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Capacity |
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgetown, South Carolina |
|
|
750 |
(7) |
|
|
60 |
(6) |
|
|
- |
(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Million Square Feet (MMSF). |
|
(2) |
|
The same reserves serve both New Mexico plants. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes mining claims and leased reserves. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes both owned and leased reserves. |
|
(5) |
|
Additional reserves available. |
|
(6) |
|
The Company has a sixty year supply agreement with Santee Cooper for synthetic gypsum. |
|
(7) |
|
Georgetown, South Carolina plant is currently under construction. |
Our gypsum wallboard production totaled 2,638 MMSF in fiscal 2007 and 2,833 MMSF in
fiscal 2006. Total gypsum wallboard sales were 2,610 MMSF in fiscal 2007 and 2,832 MMSF in fiscal
2006. Total wallboard production as a percentage of current rated capacity was 91% in fiscal 2007
and 98% in fiscal 2006. The Companys operating rates were consistent with industry average
capacity utilization in fiscal 2007 and its plants operated at full capacity during fiscal 2006
because of record wallboard demand.
Raw Materials and Fuel Supplies. We mine and extract natural gypsum rock, the principal raw
material used in the manufacture of gypsum wallboard, from mines and quarries owned, leased or
subject to mining claims owned by the Company and located near our plants. We do not presently use
synthetic gypsum although we have a supply agreement with Santee Cooper, a South Carolina utility
company, to utilize this material at our facility currently under construction in South Carolina.
Two leases cover the New Mexico reserves; one with the Pueblo of Zia and the second with the State
of New Mexico. The term of the Zia lease continues for so long as gypsum is produced in paying
quantities, as defined in the legal agreement. The term of the State lease continues for so long
as annual lease payments are made. We do not anticipate any problems in continuing to extend the
term of these leases for the foreseeable future. Gypsum ore reserves at the Gypsum, Colorado plant
are contained within a total of 115 placer mines encompassing 2,300 acres. Mineral rights are held
on an additional 108 unpatented mining claims where mineral rights can be developed upon completion
of permitting requirements. We currently own land with over 23 million tons of gypsum in the area
of Duke, Oklahoma, with an additional 8 million tons controlled through a lease agreement. Other
gypsum deposits are located near the plant in Duke, which we believe may be obtained at reasonable
costs when needed.
Through our modern low cost paperboard mill we manufacture sufficient quantities of paper
necessary for our gypsum wallboard production. Paper is the largest cost component in the
manufacture of gypsum wallboard currently representing approximately one-third of the cost of
production.
Our gypsum wallboard manufacturing operations use large quantities of natural gas and
electrical power. A significant portion of the Companys natural gas requirements for our gypsum
wallboard plants are currently provided by three gas producers under gas supply agreements expiring
in March 2008 for Colorado, October 2007 for New Mexico and Oklahoma. If the agreements are not
renewed, we expect to be able to obtain our gas supplies from other suppliers at competitive
prices. Electrical power is supplied to our New
Mexico plants at standard industrial rates by a local utility. Our Albuquerque plant utilizes an
interruptible power supply agreement, which may expose it to some production interruptions during
periods of power curtailment. Power for the Gypsum, Colorado facility is generated at the facility
by a cogeneration power plant. Currently the cogeneration power facility supplies power and waste
hot gases for drying to the gypsum
4
wallboard plant. We do not sell any power to third parties.
Gas costs currently represent approximately 20% of the production costs.
Sales and Distribution. The principal sources of demand for gypsum wallboard are (i)
residential construction, (ii) repair and remodeling, (iii) non-residential construction, and (iv)
other markets such as exports and manufactured housing, which the Company estimates accounted for
approximately 42%, 33%, 24% and 1%, respectively, of calendar 2006 industry sales. The gypsum
wallboard industry remains highly cyclical; weakening new residential construction has been
partially offset by the growth in the repair and remodeling and commercial construction segments.
Also, demand for wallboard can be seasonal and is generally greater from spring through the middle
of autumn.
We sell gypsum wallboard to numerous building materials dealers, gypsum wallboard specialty
distributors, lumber yards, home center chains and other customers located throughout the United
States. One customer with multiple shipping locations accounted for approximately 11% of our total
gypsum wallboard sales during fiscal 2007. The loss of this customer could have a material adverse
effect on our financial results.
Gypsum wallboard is sold on a delivered basis, mostly by truck. Although truck rates have
generally been negotiated for the remainder of calendar year 2007, increases in fuel costs are
difficult to pass on to the customers and could negatively impact our net revenues if significant
or prolonged surcharges were implemented by the carriers.
Although gypsum wallboard is distributed principally in regional areas, the Company and
certain other industry producers have the ability to ship gypsum wallboard by rail outside their
usual regional distribution areas to regions where demand is strong. We own or lease 241 railcars
for transporting gypsum wallboard. In addition, in order to facilitate distribution in certain
strategic areas, we maintain a distribution center in Albuquerque, New Mexico and four reload yards
in Arizona, California and Illinois. Our rail distribution capabilities permit us to service
customers in markets on both the east and west coasts. During fiscal 2007, approximately 25% of
our sales volume of gypsum wallboard was transported by rail. Equipment availability for both rail
and truck shipments is expected to increase during fiscal 2008.
Competition. There are eight manufacturers of gypsum wallboard in the U.S. operating a total
of 76 plants. We estimate that the three largest producers USG Corporation, National Gypsum
Company and Koch Industries account for approximately 65% of gypsum wallboard sales in the U.S.
In general, a number of our competitors in the gypsum wallboard industry have greater financial,
manufacturing, marketing and distribution resources than the Company. Furthermore, certain of our
competitors operate vertically integrated gypsum wallboard distribution centers, which may provide
them with certain marketing advantages over the Company.
Competition among gypsum wallboard producers is primarily on a regional basis and to a lesser
extent on a national basis. Because of the commodity nature of the product, competition is based
principally on price, which is highly sensitive to changes in supply and demand, and to a lesser
extent, on product quality and customer service.
Currently, wallboard production capacity in the United States is estimated at 37.6 billion
square feet per year, a 33% increase from 1998. The Gypsum Association, an industry trade group,
estimates that total calendar 2006 gypsum wallboard shipments by U.S. manufacturers were
approximately 35.0 billion square feet, the second highest level on record, resulting in average
industry capacity utilization of approximately 93%.
Environmental Matters. The gypsum wallboard industry is subject to numerous federal, state
and local laws and regulations pertaining to health, safety and the environment. Some of these
laws, such as the federal Clean Air Act and the federal Clean Water Act (and analogous state laws),
impose environmental permitting requirements and govern the nature and amount of emissions that may
be generated when conducting particular operations. Some laws, such as the federal Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
5
Compensation, and Liability Act (and analogous state laws), impose
obligations to clean up or remediate spills of hazardous materials into the environment. Other
laws require us to reclaim certain land upon completion of extraction and mining operations in our
quarries. None of the Companys gypsum wallboard operations are presently the subject of any
local, state or federal environmental proceedings or inquiries. The Company does not, and has not,
used asbestos in any of its gypsum wallboard products.
CEMENT OPERATIONS
Company Operations. Our cement production facilities are located in or near Buda, Texas;
LaSalle, Illinois; Laramie, Wyoming; and Fernley, Nevada. The LaSalle, Illinois, Laramie, Wyoming
and Fernley, Nevada facilities are wholly-owned. The Buda, Texas plant is owned by Texas Lehigh
Cement Company LP, a limited partnership joint venture owned 50% by the Company and 50% by Lehigh
Cement Company, a subsidiary of Heidelberg Cement AG. Our LaSalle, Illinois plant operates under
the name Illinois Cement Company, the Laramie, Wyoming plant operates under the name of Mountain
Cement Company and the Fernley, Nevada plant under the name of Nevada Cement Company.
Cement is the basic binding agent for concrete, a primary construction material. Our modern
cement plants utilize dry process technology and at present approximately 80% of our clinker
capacity is from preheater or preheater/pre-calciner kilns. The following table sets forth certain
information regarding these plants:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
Rated Annual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limestone |
|
|
Clinker Capacity |
|
Manufacturing |
|
Number of |
|
Dedication |
|
Reserves |
Location |
|
(M short tons)(1) |
|
Process |
|
Kilns |
|
Date |
|
(Years) |
Buda, TX(2) |
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
Dry 4 Stage |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1983 |
|
|
|
50+ |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preheater/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-calciner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LaSalle, IL |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
Dry 5 Stage |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
36 |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preheater/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-calciner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laramie, WY |
|
|
640 |
|
|
Dry 2 Stage |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1988 |
|
|
|
30 |
(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preheater
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dry Long |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dry Kiln
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fernley, NV |
|
|
505 |
|
|
Dry Long |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1964 |
|
|
|
50+ |
(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dry Kiln
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dry 1 Stage |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preheater |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TotalGross(3) |
|
|
3,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TotalNet(3)(4) |
|
|
2,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
One short ton equals 2,000 pounds. |
|
(2) |
|
The amounts shown represent 100% of plant capacity and production. This plant is
owned by a separate partnership in which the Company has a 50% interest. |
|
(3) |
|
Generally, a plants cement grinding production capacity is greater than its
clinker production capacity. |
|
(4) |
|
Net of partners 50% interest in the Buda, Texas plant. |
|
(5) |
|
Owned reserves. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes both owned and leased reserves. |
The Companys net cement production, including its 50% share of the cement Joint Venture
production, and conversion of purchased clinker, totaled 2.8 million tons in both fiscal 2007 and
2006. Total net cement sales, including the Companys 50% share of cement sales from the Joint
Venture, were 3.2 million tons in both fiscal 2007 and 2006 as all four plants sold 100% of the
product they produced. During the past
two years, we imported and purchased cement from others to be resold. Purchased cement sales
typically occur at lower gross profit margins. In fiscal 2007, 26% of the cement sold by us was
acquired from outside sources, compared to 21% in fiscal 2006. During
September 2006, Texas Lehigh
Cement Company, our 50% joint venture, acquired a minority interest in an import terminal in
Houston, Texas. Texas Lehigh can purchase up to 495,000 short tons annually from the cement
terminal.
6
Cement production is capital-intensive and involves high initial fixed costs. The
Company has announced plans to modernize and expand its Mountain Cement and Nevada Cement
facilities. The projects at Nevada Cement Company and Mountain Cement Company are both expected to
be completed in mid to late calendar year 2008 and 2009, respectively. Upon completion of these
projects, Mountain Cement Company and Nevada Cement Company each will have rated annual clinker
capacity of 1.0 million tons, raising total gross cement capacity to 4.4 million tons, and net
cement capacity to near 3.7 million tons.
Raw Materials and Fuel Supplies. The principal raw material used in the production of
portland cement is calcium carbonate in the form of limestone. Limestone is obtained principally
through mining and extraction operations conducted at quarries owned or leased by the Company and
located in close proximity to our plants. We believe that the estimated recoverable limestone
reserves owned or leased by us will permit each of our plants to operate at our present production
capacity for at least 30 years. Other raw materials used in substantially smaller quantities than
limestone are sand, clay, iron ore and gypsum. These materials are readily available and can
either be obtained from Company-owned or leased reserves or purchased from outside suppliers.
Our cement plants use coal and coke as their primary fuel, but are equipped to burn natural
gas as an alternative. The cost of delivered coal and coke rose in fiscal 2007 and is expected to
rise again in fiscal 2008. We have not used hazardous waste-derived fuels in our plants although
our LaSalle, Illinois and Buda, Texas plants have been permitted to burn scrap tires as a
substitute fuel. Electric power is also a major cost component in the manufacturing process and we
have sought to diminish overall power costs by adopting interruptible power supply agreements.
These agreements may expose us to some production interruptions during periods of power
curtailment.
Sales and Distribution. Demand for cement can be cyclical, because demand for concrete
products is derived from demand for construction with over 50% of demand from public works
contracts. Recently, construction spending and cement consumption have been stable. The
construction sector is also affected by the general condition of the economy as well as regional
economic influences. Regional cement markets experience peaks and valleys correlated with regional
construction cycles. Additionally, demand for cement is seasonal, particularly in northern states
where inclement winter weather affects construction activity. Sales are generally greater from
spring through the middle of autumn than during the remainder of the year. The impact on the
Company of regional construction cycles may be mitigated to some degree by our geographic
diversification.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the geographic area served by
each of our cement plants and the location of our distribution terminals in each area. We have a
total of 11 cement storage and distribution terminals that are strategically located to extend the
sales areas of our plants.
|
|
|
|
|
Plant Location |
|
Principal Geographic Areas |
|
Distribution Terminals |
Buda, Texas
|
|
Texas and western Louisiana
|
|
Corpus Christi, Texas |
|
|
|
|
Houston, Texas |
|
|
|
|
Orange, Texas |
|
|
|
|
Roanoke (Ft. Worth), Texas |
|
|
|
|
Waco, Texas |
|
|
|
|
Houston Cement Company (Joint Venture),
Houston, Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
LaSalle, Illinois
|
|
Illinois and southern Wisconsin
|
|
Hartland, Wisconsin |
|
|
|
|
|
Laramie,
Wyoming
|
|
Wyoming, Utah, Colorado and
|
|
Salt Lake City, Utah |
|
|
western Nebraska
|
|
Denver, Colorado |
|
|
|
|
North Platte, Nebraska |
|
|
|
|
|
Fernley, Nevada
|
|
Northern Nevada and northern California
|
|
Sacramento, California |
7
Cement is distributed directly to our customers mostly through customer pickups by common
carriers from plants or distribution terminals. We transport cement principally by rail to our
storage and distribution terminals. No single customer accounted for 10% or more of our cement
sales during fiscal 2007. Sales are made on the basis of competitive prices in each area. As is
customary in the industry, the Company does not typically enter into long-term sales contracts.
Competition. The cement industry is extremely competitive as a result of multiple domestic
suppliers and the importation of foreign cement through various terminal operations. The U.S.
cement industry is over 80% owned by foreign international companies. Competition among producers
and suppliers of cement is based primarily on price, with consistency of quality and service to
customers being important but of lesser significance. Price competition among individual producers
and suppliers of cement within a geographic area is intense because of the fungible nature of the
product. Because of cements low value-to-weight ratio, the relative cost of transporting cement
on land is high and limits the geographic area in which each company can market its products
economically. Therefore, the U.S. cement industry is fragmented into regional geographic areas
rather than a single national selling area. No single cement company has a distribution of plants
extensive enough to serve all geographic areas, so profitability is sensitive to shifts in the
balance between regional supply and demand.
Cement imports into the U.S. occur primarily to supplement domestic cement production. Cement
is typically imported into deep water ports or transported on the Mississippi River system near
major population centers to take advantage of lower waterborne freight costs versus higher truck
and rail transportation costs that U.S. based manufacturers incur to deliver into the same areas.
The U.S. Government and the Government of Mexico entered into an agreement in April 2006
providing for the elimination of the antidumping duties imposed by the U.S. on cement imported from
Mexico. The agreement provides for a three year transition period during which the volume of
Mexican cement imported into the southern tier of the U.S. will be limited to approximately 3
million metric tons per year and the antidumping duty imposed on Mexican cement will be set at $3
per ton. This is not expected to impact cement prices in the short term as the Portland Cement
Association (PCA) estimates that the current industry wide domestic production capacity is 27%
short of domestic consumption.
The PCA estimates that imports represented approximately 29% of cement used in the U.S. during
calendar 2006 as compared with approximately 25% in 2005 and 21% in 2004.
Environmental Matters. Our operations are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws
and regulations pertaining to health, safety and the environment. Some of these laws, such as the
federal Clean Air Act and the federal Clean Water Act (and analogous state laws) impose
environmental permitting requirements and govern the nature and amount of emissions that may be
generated when conducting particular operations. Some laws, such as the federal Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) (and analogous state laws)
impose obligations to clean up or remediate spills of hazardous materials into the environment.
Other laws require us to reclaim certain land upon completion of extraction and mining operations
in our quarries. We believe that the Company has obtained all the material environmental permits
that are necessary to conduct our operations. We further believe that the Company is conducting
its operations in substantial compliance with these permits. In addition, none of the Companys
sites is listed as a CERCLA Superfund site.
Four environmental issues involving the cement manufacturing industry deserve special mention.
The first issue involves cement kiln dust or CKD. The federal Environmental Protection Agency, or
EPA, has been evaluating the regulatory status of CKD under the federal Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA)
for a number of years. In 1999, the EPA proposed a rule that would allow states to regulate
properly-managed CKD as a non-hazardous waste under state laws and regulations governing solid
waste. In contrast, CKD that was not properly managed would be treated as a hazardous waste under
RCRA. In 2002, the EPA confirmed its intention to exempt properly-managed CKD from the hazardous
waste requirements of RCRA. The agency announced that it would collect additional data over the
next three to five years to determine if the states
8
regulation of CKD is effective, which may lead
the EPA to withdraw its 1999 proposal to treat any CKD as a hazardous
waste. In 2007, EPA indicated that during 2008 it will provide the
public with the information it has collected regarding CKD management
practices, and anticipates taking final action on the 2002
announcements in April 2009.
Currently, substantially all CKD produced in connection with our ongoing operations is
recycled, and therefore such CKD is not viewed as a waste under RCRA. However, CKD was
historically collected and stored on-site at our Illinois, Nevada and Wyoming cement plants and at
a former plant site in Corpus Christi, Texas, which is no longer in operation. If either the EPA
or the states decide to impose management standards on this CKD at some point in the future, the
Company could incur additional costs to comply with those requirements with respect to its
historically collected CKD. CKD that comes in contact with water might produce a leachate with an
alkalinity high enough to be classified as hazardous and might also leach certain hazardous trace
metals therein.
A second industry environmental issue involves the historical disposal of refractory brick
containing chromium. Such refractory brick was formerly used widely in the cement industry to line
cement kilns. The Company currently does not use refractory containing chromium and crushes spent
refractory brick, which is used as raw feed in the kiln.
A third industry environmental issue involves the potential regulation of greenhouse gases
from cement plants. Carbon dioxide, a byproduct of the cement manufacturing process, is a
greenhouse gas that many scientists and others believe contributes to the warming of the Earths
atmosphere. A recent U.S. Supreme Court decision (Massachusetts v. EPA) relating to regulation of
carbon dioxide emissions from automobiles could spur further regulation of greenhouse gasses
emitted by industries including the cement industry. Although no restrictions have yet been
imposed under federal laws (although a few states have adopted some restrictions), it is possible
that cement plants may be targeted because of the large amounts of carbon dioxide generated during
the manufacturing process. Any imposition of raw materials or production limitations, fuel-use or
carbon taxes or emissions limitations or reductions could have a significant impact on the cement
manufacturing industry and a material adverse effect on the Company and its results of operations.
Fourth, the Environmental Protection Agency has promulgated regulations for certain toxic air
pollutants, including standards for portland cement manufacturing. The maximum attainable control
technology standards require cement plants to test for certain pollutants and meet certain emission
and operating standards. Management has no reason to believe, however, that these standards have
placed the Company at a competitive disadvantage.
Management believes that our current procedures and practices in our operations, including
those for handling and managing hazardous materials, are consistent with industry standards and are
in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations. Nevertheless,
because of the complexity of operations and compliance with environmental laws, there can be no
assurance that past or future operations will not result in violations, remediation or other
liabilities or claims. Moreover, we cannot predict what environmental laws will be enacted or
adopted in the future or how such future environmental laws or regulations will be administered or
interpreted. Compliance with more stringent environmental laws, or stricter interpretation of
existing environmental laws, could necessitate significant capital outlays.
RECYCLED PAPERBOARD OPERATIONS
Company Operations. Our recycled paperboard manufacturing operation, acquired in November
2000, is located in Lawton, Oklahoma. The paperboard company operates a state-of-the-art paper
mill producing high-quality, low-basis weight gypsum liner paper for the wallboard industry from
100% recycled fiber. Manufacturing capabilities at Republic, aside from the gypsum liner products,
include recycled
containerboard grades (linerboard and medium). In addition, to maximize manufacturing
efficiencies, recycled industrial paperboard grades (tube/core stock and protective angle board)
are produced.
The Mill. The paperboard operation has a highly technologically advanced paper machine
designed for gypsum liner production, providing it with stability and longevity of output. The
papers uniform cross-
9
directional strength and finish characteristics facilitate the efficiencies
of new high-speed wallboard manufacturing lines.
The paperboard operation manufactures high strength gypsum liner that is approximately 20%
lighter in basis weight than generally available in the U.S. The low-basis weight product utilizes
less recycled fiber to produce paper that, in turn, absorbs less moisture during the gypsum
wallboard manufacturing process; therefore, reducing drying requirement and energy (natural gas)
usage. The low-basis weight paper also reduces the overall finished board weight, providing
wallboard operations with more competitive transportation costs both the inbound and outbound
segments.
Raw Materials. The principal raw materials are recycled paper fiber (recovered waste paper),
water and specialty paper chemicals. The largest waste paper source used by the operation is old
cardboard containers (known as OCC). A blend of high grades (white papers consisting of ink free
papers such as news blank and unprinted papers ) is used in the facing paper to produce a white
product with customer desired properties.
Adequate supply of OCC recycled fiber will continue to be available from generators and
brokers located within a 600 mile radius of the paper mill. The majority of the recycled fiber
purchased is delivered via truck, with the limited remainder (5%) delivered by rail. Prices are
subject to market fluctuations based on generation of material (supply), demand and the presence of
the export market. The current outlook for fiscal year 2008 is for
the waste paper prices to
increase moderately, largely due to export demand from China. Current customer contracts include
price escalators to compensate for changes in raw material / fiber prices.
The chemicals used in the paper making operation, including size, retention aids, dry
strengths additives, biocides and bacteria controls, are readily available from several
manufacturers at competitive prices. We are under contractual agreement with our current supplier
and have the opportunity for renewal in fiscal year 2008.
The manufacture of recycled paperboard involves the use of large volumes of water in the
production process. The mill uses water provided under an agreement with the City of Lawton,
Oklahoma municipal services. The agreement with the City of Lawton, Oklahoma, which commenced in
calendar year 1999, is for a fifteen year term with two automatic five-year extensions, unless the
Company notifies the City in writing at least six months prior to the expiration of the term or
extended term. Although adequate sources of water have historically been available, an extended
period of general water shortages, legal curtailment of any paper mills current water sources or
uses, or deterioration of the current quality of water could adversely affect the operations,
thereby limiting its production capacity.
Electricity, natural gas and other utilities rates are available to the Company at either
contracted rates or standard industrial rates in adequate supplies. These utilities are subject to
standard industrial curtailment provisions. In the event that a natural gas curtailment or
unfavorable pricing condition should occur, the Lawton mill is equipped to use fuel oil as an
alternative fuel in the No.1 boiler.
Paperboard operations are generally large consumers of energy primarily natural gas and
electricity. During fiscal 2007, natural gas pricing was slightly less than the previous year,
yielding a savings for the Company; however, prices are expected to increase during fiscal 2008. If
natural gas prices continue to increase, they are expected to negatively impact fiscal 2008
production costs and operating earnings. The paper mill is subject to an electricity supply
agreement with Public Service of Oklahoma (PSO); however, this power company has a large dependency
on natural gas, which could negatively impact the electricity rates.
Sales and Distribution. Our manufactured recycled paperboard products are sold primarily to
gypsum wallboard manufacturers. During fiscal 2007, approximately 40% of the recycled paperboard
sold by the paper mill was consumed by the Companys gypsum wallboard manufacturing operations,
approximately 40% was sold to CertainTeed, pursuant to a paper supply contract (the CertainTeed
Agreement), and the remainder was shipped to other gypsum wallboard manufacturers and
containerboard manufacturers. The
10
existing CertainTeed Agreement was originally entered into by
Republic Paperboard (the Company) and James Hardie Gypsum, Inc. in 1999; however, the James Hardie
North American gypsum wallboard operations were acquired by BPB Gypsum, whose operations were
purchased during fiscal 2006 by St. Gobain. St. Gobain North American operations function under
the CertainTeed trade name. The loss of CertainTeed as a customer or a termination or reduction of
CertainTeeds production of gypsum wallboard, unless replaced by a commercially similar
arrangement, could have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Environmental Matters. Prior to November 2000, the Companys now closed Commerce City,
Colorado paper mill (the Commerce City Mill) had investigated the presence of subsurface
petroleum hydrocarbons at the mill site and had retained an environmental consultant who concluded
that fuel oil, jet fuel, and gasoline additives had migrated in the subsurface of the property from
an adjacent property. As a result of an additional subsequent investigation by the Commerce City
Mill, new environmental conditions were uncovered that appear to stem from underground storage tank
use on the mill site. The Commerce City Mill and a former owner of the Commerce City Mill have
entered into a participation agreement with the Division of Oil and Public Safety of the Colorado
Department of Labor and Employment (the Oil Division) to respond to those conditions that appear
to stem from historic underground storage tank use. Under the participation agreement, the
Commerce City mill will pay 25% (with the former owner paying 75%) of the costs associated with the
investigation and remediation efforts approved by both parties. The Company and the former owner
have each approved and submitted to the Oil Division a Corrective Action Plan (the CAP) for the
removal of the subsurface petroleum hydrocarbon at the Commerce City Mill. The CAP was approved by
the Oil Inspection Section in calendar 2002. All remediation has been completed and we are
awaiting final approval by the State of Colorado.
CONCRETE AND AGGREGATES OPERATIONS
Company Operations. Readymix concrete, a versatile, low-cost building material used in almost
all construction, involves the mixing of cement, sand, gravel, or crushed stone and water to form
concrete which is then sold and distributed to numerous construction contractors. Concrete is
produced in batch plants and transported to the customers job site in mixer trucks.
The construction aggregates business consists of the mining, extraction, production and sale
of crushed stone, sand, gravel and lightweight aggregates such as expanded clays and shales.
Construction aggregates of suitable characteristics are employed in virtually all types of
construction, including the production of portland cement concrete and asphaltic mixes in highway
construction and maintenance.
We produce and distribute readymix concrete from company owned sites north of Sacramento,
California and in Austin, Texas. The following table sets forth certain information regarding
these operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
Number of Plants |
|
Number of Trucks |
Northern California |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Austin, Texas |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We conduct aggregate operations near our concrete facilities in northern California and
Austin, Texas. Aggregates are obtained principally by mining and extracting from quarries owned or
leased by the Company. The following table sets forth certain information regarding these
operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Annual |
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production Capacity |
|
Minimum |
Location |
|
Types of Aggregates |
|
(Thousand tons) |
|
Reserves (Years) |
Northern California |
|
Sand and Gravel |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
|
100+ |
(1) |
Austin, Texas |
|
Limestone |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
60 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Owned reserves through various subsidiaries. |
|
(2) |
|
Leased reserves. |
11
The Companys total net aggregate sales were 4.9 million tons in fiscal 2007 and 5.7
million tons in fiscal 2006. Total aggregates production was 5.6 million tons for fiscal 2007 and
5.8 million for fiscal 2006. A portion of the Companys total aggregates production is used
internally by the Companys readymix concrete operations.
Raw Materials. The Company supplies from its manufactured cement facilities approximately
100% and 0% of its cement requirements for its Austin and northern California concrete operations,
respectively. The Company supplies approximately 35% and 51%, respectively, of its aggregates
requirements for its Austin and northern California concrete operations. The Company obtains the
balance of its cement and aggregates requirements from multiple sources in each of these areas.
We mine and extract limestone and sand and gravel, the principal raw materials used in the
production of aggregates, from quarries owned or leased by the Company and located near its plants.
The northern California quarry is estimated to contain over one billion tons of sand and gravel
reserves. The Austin, Texas quarry is covered by a lease which expires in 2060. Based on its
current production capacity, the Company estimates its northern California and Austin, Texas
quarries contain over 100 years and approximately 60 years of reserves, respectively.
Sales and Distribution. Demand for readymix concrete and aggregates largely depend on local
levels of construction activity. The construction sector is subject to weather conditions, the
availability of financing at reasonable rates and overall fluctuations in local economies, and
therefore tends to be cyclical. We sell readymix concrete to numerous contractors and other
customers in each plants selling area. Our batch plants in Austin and northern California are
strategically located to serve each selling area. Concrete is delivered from the batch plants by
trucks owned by the Company.
We sell aggregates to building contractors and other customers engaged in a wide variety of
construction activities. Aggregates are delivered from our aggregate plants by common carriers and
customer pick-up. One customer accounted for approximately 12% of our aggregate sales in fiscal
2007. At presently we are attempting to secure a rail link from our principal aggregates deposit
north of Sacramento, California to supply extended markets in northern California.
Competition. Both the concrete and aggregates industries are highly fragmented, with numerous
participants operating in each local area. Because the cost of transporting concrete and
aggregates is very high relative to product values, producers of concrete and aggregates typically
can sell their products only in areas within 50 miles of their production facilities. Barriers to
entry in each industry are low, except with respect to environmental permitting requirements for
new aggregate production facilities and zoning of land to permit mining and extraction of
aggregates.
Environmental Matters. The concrete and aggregates industry is subject to environmental
regulations similar to those governing our cement operations. None of our concrete or aggregates
operations are presently the subject of any material local, state or federal environmental
proceeding or inquiries.
EMPLOYEES
As of March 31, 2007, we had approximately 1,600 employees.
As of March 31, 2007, we had approximately 450 employees employed under collective bargaining
agreements and various supplemental agreements with local unions.
12
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We make our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on
Form 8-K, and all amendments to these reports available free of charge through the investor
relations page of our website, located at
www.eaglematerials.com as soon as reasonably practicable
after they are filed with or furnished to the SEC. Alternatively, you may contact our investor
relations department directly at (214) 432-2000 or by writing to Eagle Materials Inc., Investor
Relations, 3811 Turtle Creek Blvd., Suite 1100, Dallas, Texas 75219.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
These statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause the
Companys actual results to be materially different from planned or expected results. Those risks
and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
Levels of construction spending. Demand for the Companys products is directly
related to the level of activity in the construction industry, which includes
residential, commercial and infrastructure construction. Furthermore, activity in the
infrastructure construction business is directly related to the amount of government
funding available for such projects. Any decrease in the amount of government funds
available for such projects or any decrease in construction activity in general,
including the continued slow down of home building activity, could have a material
adverse effect on the Companys financial condition and results of operations. |
|
|
|
|
Interest rates. The Companys business is significantly affected by the movement of
interest rates. Interest rates have a direct impact on the level of residential,
commercial and infrastructure construction activity put in place. Higher interest
rates could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
In addition, increases in interest rates could result in higher interest expense
related to the Companys borrowings under its credit facilities. |
|
|
|
|
Price fluctuations and supply/demand for our products. The products sold by the
Company are commodities and competition among manufacturers is based largely on price.
Prices are often subject to material changes in response to relatively minor
fluctuations in supply and demand, general economic conditions and other market
conditions beyond our control. Increases in the production capacity for products such
as gypsum wallboard may create an oversupply of such products and negatively impact
product prices. There can be no assurance that prices for products sold by the Company
will not decline in the future or that such declines will not have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition and results of operations. |
|
|
|
|
Significant changes in the cost of, and the availability of, fuel, energy and other
raw materials. Significant increases in the cost of fuel, energy or raw materials used
in connection with our businesses or substantial decreases in their availability could
materially and adversely effect our sales and operating profits. Major cost components
in each of our businesses are the cost of fuel, energy and raw materials. Prices for
fuel, energy or raw materials used in connection with our businesses could change
significantly in a short period of time for reasons outside our control. In the event
of large or rapid increases in prices, we may not be able to pass the increases through
to our customers in full, which would reduce our operating margin. |
|
|
|
|
The seasonal nature of the Companys business. A majority of our business is
seasonal with peak revenues and profits occurring primarily in the months of April
through November. Quarterly results have varied significantly in the past and are
likely to vary significantly from
quarter to quarter in the future. Such variations could have a negative impact on the
price of the Companys common stock. |
13
|
|
|
National and regional economic conditions. A majority of our revenues are from
customers who are in industries and businesses that are cyclical in nature and subject
to changes in general economic conditions. In addition, since operations occur in a
variety of geographic markets, our businesses are subject to the economic conditions in
each such geographic market. General economic downturns or localized downturns in the
regions where we have operations, including any downturns in the construction industry
or increases in capacity in the gypsum wallboard, paperboard and cement industries,
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations. |
|
|
|
|
Unfavorable weather conditions during peak construction periods and other unexpected
operational difficulties. Because a majority of our business is seasonal, bad weather
conditions and other unexpected operational difficulties during peak periods could
adversely affect operating income and cash flow and could have a disproportionate
impact on our results of operations for the full year. |
|
|
|
|
Competition from new or existing competitors or the ability to successfully
penetrate new markets. The construction products industry is highly competitive. If
we are unable to keep our products competitively priced, our sales could be reduced
materially. Also, we may experience increased competition from companies offering
products based on new processes that are more efficient or result in improvements in
product performance, which could put us at a disadvantage and cause us to lose
customers and sales volume. Our failure to continue to compete effectively could have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations. |
|
|
|
|
Environmental liabilities. Our operations are subject to state, federal and local
environmental laws and regulations, which impose liability for clean up or remediation
of environmental pollution and hazardous waste arising from past acts; and require
pollution control and prevention, site restoration and operating permits and/or
approvals to conduct certain of its operations. Certain of our operations may from
time-to-time involve the use of substances that are classified as toxic or hazardous
substances within the meaning of these laws and regulations. Risk of environmental
liability is inherent in the operation of our businesses. As a result, it is possible
that environmental liabilities could have a material adverse effect on the Company in
the future. |
|
|
|
|
Compliance with governmental regulations. Our operations and our customers are
subject to and affected by federal, state and local laws and regulations with respect
to land usage, street and highway usage, noise level and health and safety and
environmental matters. In many instances, various permits are required for
construction and related operations. Although management believes that we are in
compliance in all material respects with regulatory requirements, there can be no
assurance that the Company will not incur material costs or liabilities in connection
with regulatory requirements or that demand for its products will be affected by
regulatory issues affecting its customers. |
|
|
|
|
Events that may disrupt the U.S. or world economy. Future terrorist attacks, the
ensuing U.S. military and other responsive actions, could have a significant adverse
effect on the general economic, market and political conditions, which in turn could
have material adverse effect on the Companys business. |
|
|
|
|
Significant changes in the cost and availability of transportation. Some of the raw
materials used in our manufacturing processes, such as coal or coke, are transported to
our facilities by truck or rail. In addition, the transportation costs associated with
the delivery of our wallboard products are a significant portion of the variable cost
of the wallboard division. Significant increases in the cost of fuel or energy can
result in material increases in the cost of transportation which could
materially and adversely affect our operating profits. In addition, reductions in the
availability of certain modes of transportation such as rail or trucking could limit our
ability to deliver product and therefore materially and adversely affect our operating
profits. |
14
In general, the Company is subject to the risks and uncertainties of the construction industry
and of doing business in the U.S. The forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this
report, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update them, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
There are no unresolved staff comments.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
We operate cement plants, quarries and related facilities at Buda, Texas; LaSalle, Illinois;
Fernley, Nevada and Laramie, Wyoming. The Buda plant is owned by a partnership in which EXP has a
50% interest. Our principal aggregate plants and quarries are located in the Austin, Texas area
and Marysville, California. In addition, we operate gypsum wallboard plants in Albuquerque and
nearby Bernalillo, New Mexico, Gypsum, Colorado and Duke, Oklahoma and are currently constructing a
plant in Georgetown, South Carolina. We produce recycled paperboard at Lawton, Oklahoma. None of
our facilities are pledged as security for any debts.
See Item 1. Business on pages 1-12 of this Report for additional information relating to the
Companys properties.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are a party to certain ordinary legal proceedings incidental to our business. In general,
although the outcome of litigation is inherently uncertain, we believe that all of the pending
litigation proceedings in which the Company or any subsidiary are currently involved are likely to
be resolved without having a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition or
operations of the Company. In connection with the audit of our federal income tax returns for the fiscal years ended March 31,
2001, 2002, and 2003, the IRS issued to the Company a Notice of Proposed Adjustment, on May 10,
2007 that proposes to reduce the tax basis of, and disallow a portion of the depreciation
deductions claimed by the Company with respect to, assets acquired by the Company from Republic
Group LLC in a transaction completed in November 2000 (the
Republic Assets). See Footnote (H) of the consolidated financial statements for more
information.
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Not applicable.
15
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF
EQUITY SECURITIES
STOCK PRICES AND DIVIDENDS
As of May 23, 2007, there were approximately 3,000 holders of record of our Common Stock which
trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol EXP.
The following table sets forth the high and low closing prices for our Common Stock as
reported on the New York Stock Exchange for the periods indicated, as well as dividends paid during
these periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2007 |
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2006 |
Quarter ended: |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Dividends |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Dividends |
June 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
74.30 |
|
|
$ |
38.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.175 |
|
|
$ |
31.41 |
|
|
$ |
24.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
46.62 |
|
|
$ |
33.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.175 |
|
|
$ |
40.26 |
|
|
$ |
30.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
44.73 |
|
|
$ |
32.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.175 |
|
|
$ |
41.52 |
|
|
$ |
31.62 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
49.39 |
|
|
$ |
42.84 |
|
|
$ |
0.175 |
|
|
$ |
63.76 |
|
|
$ |
37.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
On March 21, 2007, we announced an increase in the annual dividend to $0.80 per share
beginning with the dividend payment scheduled for July 20, 2007.
SHARE REPURCHASES
The Companys Board of Directors has approved the repurchase of a cumulative total of
31,610,605 shares of the Companys Common Stock for repurchase since the Company became publicly
held in April 1994. On November 7, 2006, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to
repurchase up to an additional 5,156,800 shares, for a total authorization, as of that date, of
6,000,000 shares, of which 5,495,800 remain eligible for purchase at March 31, 2007. The Company
repurchased 2,706,791 shares, 4,547,163 shares and 1,986,600 shares of Common Stock at a cost of
$100.4 million, $165.3 million and $43.8 million in the years ended March 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
The total number of shares purchased in the table below represents shares of Common Stock
repurchased pursuant to the Board of Directors authorization dated November 29, 1998, as amended
July 28, 2004, January 24, 2006 and November 7, 2006. Share repurchases may be made from
time-to-time in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The timing and amount of
any repurchases of shares will be determined by Company management, based on its evaluation of
market and economic conditions and other factors.
Purchases of the Companys Common Stock during the quarter ended March 31, 2007 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
Maximum Number of |
|
|
Total Number |
|
Average |
|
Purchased as Part of |
|
Shares that May Yet |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Price Paid |
|
Publicly Announced |
|
be Purchased Under |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
Per Share |
|
Plans or Programs |
|
the Plans or Programs |
January 1 through January 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 1 through February 28, 2007 |
|
|
196,300 |
|
|
$ |
45.69 |
|
|
|
196,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
March 1 through March 31, 2007 |
|
|
353,691 |
|
|
$ |
44.91 |
|
|
|
307,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter 4 Totals |
|
|
549,991 |
|
|
$ |
45.19 |
|
|
|
504,200 |
|
|
|
5,495,800 |
|
|
|
|
The equity compensation plan information set for in Part III, Item 12 of this Form 10-K
is hereby incorporated by reference into this Part II, Item 5.
16
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (1)
(amounts in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
Revenues |
|
$ |
922,401 |
|
|
$ |
859,702 |
|
|
$ |
616,541 |
|
|
$ |
502,622 |
|
|
$ |
429,178 |
|
Earnings Before Income Taxes |
|
|
304,288 |
|
|
|
241,066 |
|
|
|
158,089 |
|
|
|
102,123 |
|
|
|
86,613 |
|
Net Earnings |
|
|
202,664 |
|
|
|
160,984 |
|
|
|
106,687 |
|
|
|
66,901 |
|
|
|
57,606 |
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share |
|
|
4.07 |
|
|
|
3.02 |
|
|
|
1.91 |
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
|
1.04 |
|
Cash Dividends Per Share |
|
|
0.70 |
(3) |
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
2.15 |
(2) |
|
|
0.07 |
|
Total Assets |
|
|
971,410 |
|
|
|
888,916 |
|
|
|
780,001 |
|
|
|
692,975 |
|
|
|
706,355 |
|
Total Debt |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
84,800 |
|
|
|
82,880 |
|
|
|
80,927 |
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
546,046 |
|
|
|
464,738 |
|
|
|
485,368 |
|
|
|
439,022 |
(2) |
|
|
479,611 |
|
Book Value Per Share At Year End |
|
$ |
11.40 |
|
|
$ |
9.24 |
|
|
$ |
8.88 |
|
|
$ |
7.80 |
|
|
$ |
8.70 |
|
Average Diluted Shares Outstanding |
|
|
49,787 |
|
|
|
53,330 |
|
|
|
55,884 |
|
|
|
56,208 |
|
|
|
55,572 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Financial Highlights should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for
matters that affect the comparability of the information presented above. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes a special one-time $2.00 per share ($112.9 million total) dividend
paid in connection with the Spin-off from Centex Corporation. |
|
(3) |
|
On March 21, 2007 the Company announced that it was increasing its annual dividend
payment to $0.80 beginning with the July 20, 2007 dividend
payment. |
17
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
Eagle Materials Inc. is a diversified producer of basic building materials and construction
products used in residential, industrial, commercial and infrastructure construction. Information
presented for the three years ended March 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 reflects the Companys four
businesses segments, consisting of Gypsum Wallboard, Cement, Recycled Paperboard and Concrete and
Aggregates. Certain information for each of Concrete and Aggregates is broken out separately in the
segment discussions.
We operate in cyclical commodity businesses. Downturns in overall economic activity usually
have a significant adverse effect on these businesses due to decreased demand and reduced pricing.
Our operations, depending on each business segment, range from local in nature to national
businesses; therefore, we have operations in a variety of geographic markets, subjecting our
businesses to the economic conditions in each such geographic market. General economic downturns
or localized downturns in the regions where we have operations could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our Wallboard and Paperboard
operations are more national in scope and shipments are made throughout the continental U.S.,
except for the Northeast; however, our primary markets are in the Southwestern U.S. Demand for
wallboard varies between regions with the East and West Coasts representing the largest demand
centers. Our cement companies are located in geographic areas west of the Mississippi river and
the Chicago, Illinois metropolitan area. Due to the low value-to-weight ratio of cement, cement is
usually shipped within a 150 mile radius of the plants by truck and up to 300 miles by rail.
Concrete and aggregates are even more regional as those operations serve the areas immediately
surrounding Austin, Texas and north of Sacramento, California. Therefore, demand for cement,
concrete and aggregates is tied more closely to the economies of the local and regional markets,
which may fluctuate more widely than in the nation as a whole.
Fiscal 2007 represented the highest fiscal year operating profits in our history, up 25% from
fiscal year 2006. Much of this increase can be attributed to the Gypsum Wallboard segment, whose
operating earnings increased by 28% in fiscal 2007 as compared to fiscal 2006, primarily as a
result of the 18% increase in average sales price. Our cement companies completed their
21st consecutive sold-out year and set a new record for sales volume. Sales volume for
our cement companies increased to 3.2 million tons during fiscal 2007, a 1% increase over fiscal
year 2006. Additionally, average cement sales prices during fiscal 2007 were the highest in our
history, increasing nearly $10 per ton over fiscal 2006. Paperboard operating earnings declined
due to a reduction in the percentage of gypsum wallboard liner sold during the year, primarily due
to the reduced demand in the residential housing market. Increases in average sales prices for both
the concrete and aggregate segments contributed to a 53% and 101% increase in operating earnings,
respectively, despite sales volumes remaining flat for concrete and decreasing for aggregates.
Corporate expenses increased $3.9 million due primarily to increased compensation and benefit
costs, with the majority of the increase attributable to stock compensation expense.
Declining demand in the residential housing market, which comprises approximately 50% of the
demand for gypsum wallboard, has significantly affected the gypsum wallboard industry. According
to the Gypsum Association, national wallboard shipments declined 3% during calendar year 2006 as
compared to calendar year 2005 with the entire decline occurring in the last half of the year.
Shipments in the first three months of calendar 2007 were approximately 7.8 billion square feet, a
decline of approximately 18% from the 9.5 billion square feet sold during the first three months of
calendar 2006 and industry wallboard utilization is expected to be in
the low-to-mid 80% range for
the remainder of calendar 2007. We expect increasing price competition in the wallboard
marketplace during calendar 2007.
U.S. cement consumption continues to be strong. Total U.S. cement shipments of approximately
141 million short tons for calendar 2006 were 0.3% below calendar 2005. Cement imports for calendar
2006 were 39 million short tons, 7% above last years imports. The U.S. Cement Industry has been
sold out for the last twelve years as a result of a domestic capacity deficit. Current U.S. cement
demand requires imports of over 27% to supplement domestic capacity. We anticipate a tight supply
of imported cement this year due to high freight
18
rates and increasing demand in world markets. Cement pricing has increased 8% over prior year, the
second straight year of price increases, reversing a slight decline over the prior three years. We
implemented cumulative price increases of between $5.00 and $10.00 per ton in all our markets
during fiscal 2007.
The Company conducts one of its cement operations through a joint venture, Texas Lehigh Cement
Company LP, which is located in Buda, Texas (the Joint Venture). The Company owns a 50% interest
in the joint venture and accounts for its interest under the equity method of accounting. However,
for purposes of the Cement segment information presented, the Company proportionately consolidates
its 50% share of the Joint Ventures revenues and operating earnings, which is the way management
organizes the segments within the Company for making operating decisions and assessing performance.
See Note (G) of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional segment
information.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Fiscal Year 2007 Compared to Fiscal Year 2006
Consolidated Results. Consolidated net revenues for fiscal 2007 were up 7% from fiscal 2006
driven by higher sales prices primarily in the Gypsum Wallboard and Cement segments. Fiscal 2007
operating earnings of $309.7 million, a record high, were up 17% from $263.8 million last fiscal
year mainly due to increased Gypsum Wallboard and Cement operating earnings.
The following tables lists by line of business the revenues and operating earnings discussed
in our operating segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Operating Earnings(1) |
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Gypsum Wallboard |
|
$ |
511,615 |
|
|
$ |
479,134 |
|
|
$ |
198,085 |
|
|
$ |
154,227 |
|
Cement |
|
|
321,852 |
|
|
|
285,289 |
|
|
|
92,182 |
|
|
|
78,311 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
127,545 |
|
|
|
133,482 |
|
|
|
18,998 |
|
|
|
20,087 |
|
Concrete and Aggregates |
|
|
97,323 |
|
|
|
89,778 |
|
|
|
16,249 |
|
|
|
9,613 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
4,547 |
|
|
|
2,279 |
|
|
|
4,547 |
|
|
|
1,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
1,062,882 |
|
|
|
989,962 |
|
|
$ |
330,061 |
|
|
$ |
263,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Intersegment Revenues |
|
|
(63,959 |
) |
|
|
(65,096 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Joint Venture Revenues |
|
|
(76,522 |
) |
|
|
(65,164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
922,401 |
|
|
$ |
859,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Prior to Corporate General and Administrative and interest expense. |
Corporate Overhead. Corporate general and administrative expenses for fiscal 2007 were
$20.3 million compared to $16.4 million for last fiscal year. The increase was primarily the
result of increased compensation and benefit costs, including increased stock compensation expense.
Other Income. Other income consists of a variety of items that are non-segment operating in
nature and includes clinker sales income, non-inventoried aggregates income, gypsum wallboard
distribution center income, asset sales and other miscellaneous income and cost items.
Net Interest Expense. Net interest expense of $5.4 million for fiscal 2007 decreased by $0.9
million from fiscal 2006 due to increased capitalized interest related to the expansion and
modernization at Illinois Cement Company and the construction of the new gypsum wallboard facility
in Georgetown, South Carolina, offset by increased average net borrowings during the year.
Income Taxes. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2007 increased to 33.4% from 33.2% primarily
due to the implementation of the Texas state margin tax during fiscal 2007.
19
Net Income. As a result of the foregoing, pre-tax earnings of $304.3 million were 26.2% above
fiscal 2006 pre-tax earnings of $241.1 million. Fiscal 2007 net earnings of $202.7 million
increased 25.9% from net earnings of $161.0 million in fiscal 2006. Diluted earnings per share in
fiscal 2007 of $4.07 were 34.8% higher than the $3.02 for fiscal 2006.
GYPSUM WALLBOARD OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Revenues, as reported |
|
$ |
511,615 |
|
|
$ |
479,134 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Freight and Delivery Costs billed to customers |
|
|
(89,121 |
) |
|
|
(89,374 |
) |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues |
|
$ |
422,494 |
|
|
$ |
389,760 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Volume (MMSF) |
|
|
2,610 |
|
|
|
2,832 |
|
|
|
(8 |
)% |
Average Net Sales Price (1) |
|
$ |
161.86 |
|
|
$ |
137.65 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
Unit Costs |
|
$ |
85.97 |
|
|
$ |
83.17 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Operating Margin |
|
$ |
75.89 |
|
|
$ |
54.48 |
|
|
|
39 |
% |
Operating Earnings |
|
$ |
198,085 |
|
|
$ |
154,227 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
Freight per MSF |
|
$ |
34.15 |
|
|
$ |
31.57 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net of freight per MSF. |
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
The increase in revenues during fiscal 2007 is due
primarily to increased sales prices during the year,
partially offset by the decline in sales volume. Sales
prices increased through July 2006, before beginning to
decline over the remainder of the year. Additionally,
demand, particularly in residential homebuilding,
declined, which reduced marketplace utilization during
the fiscal third and fourth quarters of 2007 as
compared to 2006. |
|
|
|
Operating Margins:
|
|
Wallboard operating margins increased in fiscal 2007 as
compared to fiscal 2006 primarily due to increased
sales prices and lower fuel costs during the fiscal
year, offset slightly by increased transportation and
raw materials costs along with increased incentive
compensation expenses. |
|
|
|
Outlook:
|
|
The Company expects residential housing to remain soft,
which will have an adverse impact on our fiscal 2008
operating results. During the first quarter of
calendar 2007, wallboard shipments declined 18% from
the first quarter of calendar 2006. Additionally, we
expect that pricing will continue to decline in fiscal
2008 as industry utilization is expected to remain in
the low-to-mid 80% range. The non-residential housing
market is expected to remain strong; however, these
markets are not expected to completely offset the
impact of the reduction in residential housing. |
20
CEMENT OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Revenues, including intersegment |
|
$ |
321,852 |
|
|
$ |
285,289 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Freight and Delivery Costs billed to customers |
|
|
(13,013 |
) |
|
|
(19,212 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues |
|
$ |
308,839 |
|
|
$ |
266,077 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Volume (M Tons) |
|
|
3,235 |
|
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Average Net Sales Price |
|
$ |
93.13 |
|
|
$ |
83.15 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Unit Costs (including imports and
purchased cement) |
|
$ |
64.63 |
|
|
$ |
58.68 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Operating Margin |
|
$ |
28.50 |
|
|
$ |
24.47 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
Operating Earnings |
|
$ |
92,182 |
|
|
$ |
78,311 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
The increase in revenues in fiscal 2007 as compared to
fiscal 2006 is due primarily to increased average sales
prices and a slight increase in sales volume.
Purchased cement comprised approximately 26% of total
sales during fiscal 2007, as compared to 21.1% in
fiscal 2006. |
|
|
|
Operating Margins:
|
|
Operating margins increased by 16% due to increased net
sales prices, offset by higher fuel, maintenance and
purchased cement costs coupled with the impact of
153,000 additional tons of high cost purchased cement
sales in fiscal 2007 as compared to fiscal 2006. The
start up of the Illinois Cement plant adversely
impacted margins by approximately $2.25 per ton.
Purchased cement cost in fiscal 2007 increased by
approximately 13% over fiscal 2006. The purchased
cement volume increase is attributed to purchases
through our newly-acquired interest Houston Cement
Company along with 70,000 tons of purchased cement at
Illinois Cement Company during the start up of the new
plant. |
|
|
|
Outlook:
|
|
Demand for cement is expected to remain strong, as
imports are expected to comprise over 27% of all cement
consumed in the United States in calendar 2007. Price
increases scheduled for the early part of calendar year
2007 were delayed due primarily to poor weather in most
of our markets, but we expect these price increases to
take effect during the middle of calendar 2007. We
expect operating margins to increase during fiscal 2008
as additional production from our Illinois Cement plant
expansion will replace low margin purchased cement
sales with manufactured cement in this market.
Additionally, state budgets look strong, which should
enable consistent infrastructure spending during fiscal
2008. |
21
RECYCLED PAPERBOARD OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Revenues, including intersegment |
|
$ |
127,545 |
|
|
$ |
133,482 |
|
|
|
(4 |
)% |
Freight and Delivery Costs billed to customers |
|
|
(2,950 |
) |
|
|
(2,587 |
) |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues |
|
$ |
124,595 |
|
|
$ |
130,895 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Volume (M Tons) |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)% |
Average Net Sales Price |
|
$ |
452.99 |
|
|
$ |
452.63 |
|
|
|
|
% |
Unit Costs |
|
$ |
383.91 |
|
|
$ |
383.12 |
|
|
|
|
% |
Operating Margin |
|
$ |
69.08 |
|
|
$ |
69.51 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
Operating Earnings |
|
$ |
18,998 |
|
|
$ |
20,087 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
Net revenues declined during fiscal 2007 as compared to
fiscal 2006 due to a decrease in sales volume during
fiscal 2007. The decrease in sales volume was due
primarily to the reduction in demand for gypsum liner
during fiscal 2007 as compared to fiscal 2006. Gypsum
liner sales volume declined 14% in fiscal 2007 as
compared to fiscal 2006. The gypsum liner sales volume
decline was partially offset by a 28,000 ton sales
volume increase for medium and containerboard. |
|
|
|
Operating Margins:
|
|
Operating margin remained relatively flat during fiscal
2007 as compared to fiscal 2006. High margin gypsum
liner sales volume declined 14% in fiscal 2007
compared to fiscal 2006. The gypsum liner sales
volume decline was partially offset by the increased
sales prices for all grades of paper. Also, higher
fiber costs were offset by lower gas and chemicals
costs. |
|
|
|
Outlook:
|
|
The reduced demand for high margin gypsum liner is
expected to adversely impact our recycled paperboard
operations. The start up of our new wallboard plant
in Georgetown, South Carolina is expected to have a
positive impact during the fourth quarter of fiscal
2008 as it is expected to increase sales of higher
priced gypsum liner. Additionally, increases in
the cost of fiber and natural gas could have an adverse
impact on our paperboard operations as these two costs
comprise a significant portion of our production costs. |
22
CONCRETE AND AGGREGATES OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
CONCRETE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Revenues |
|
$ |
63,354 |
|
|
$ |
55,269 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Volume (M Yards) |
|
|
882 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
|
% |
Average Net Sales Price |
|
$ |
71.81 |
|
|
$ |
62.61 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Unit Costs |
|
$ |
60.71 |
|
|
$ |
55.37 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Operating Margin |
|
$ |
11.10 |
|
|
$ |
7.24 |
|
|
|
53 |
% |
Operating Earnings |
|
$ |
9,793 |
|
|
$ |
6,395 |
|
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AGGREGATES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Revenues, including intersegment |
|
$ |
33,968 |
|
|
$ |
34,509 |
|
|
|
(2 |
)% |
Freight & Delivery Cost billed to customers |
|
|
(406 |
) |
|
|
(831 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues |
|
$ |
33,562 |
|
|
$ |
33,678 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Volume (M Tons) |
|
|
4,875 |
|
|
|
5,714 |
|
|
|
(15 |
)% |
Average Net Sales Price |
|
$ |
6.88 |
|
|
$ |
5.89 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
Unit Costs |
|
$ |
5.56 |
|
|
$ |
5.33 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Operating Margin |
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
|
135 |
% |
Operating Earnings |
|
$ |
6,456 |
|
|
$ |
3,218 |
|
|
|
101 |
% |
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
Concrete revenues increased 15% in fiscal 2007 as
compared to fiscal 2006, primarily due to the increase
in the average sales price during the year. Aggregate
revenues remained relatively flat despite the increase
in average sales price, primarily due to the decline in
sales volume during the year. The decline in sales
volumes was primarily in our northern California
market, and was generally due to poor weather during
the first and fourth quarters of fiscal 2007. |
|
|
|
Operating Margins:
|
|
Concrete operating margins increased 53% during fiscal
2007 as compared to 2006, primarily due to a 15%
increase in the average sales price during the year,
partially offset by higher cement and aggregate costs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate operating margins in fiscal 2007 increased
135% from fiscal 2006 due primarily to a 17% increase
in the average net sales price; partially offset by the
negative impact on fixed costs of a 6% decline in
production volume in addition to the decline of higher
margin concrete aggregates sales volumes. |
|
|
|
Outlook:
|
|
The Company expects aggregate pricing to remain strong
during fiscal year 2008, principally because of strong
construction activity in the Austin, Texas market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concrete pricing may weaken during fiscal year 2008 in
both of our markets due to increased competition in the
marketplace. |
23
Fiscal Year 2006 Compared to Fiscal Year 2005
Consolidated Results. Consolidated net revenues for fiscal 2006 were up 39% from fiscal 2005
driven by higher sales prices and volumes in all segments, especially Gypsum Wallboard and Cement.
Fiscal 2006 operating earnings of $263.8 million were up 54% from $171.7 million last fiscal year
mainly due to increased Gypsum Wallboard and Cement operating earnings.
The following tables list by line of business the revenues and operating earnings discussed in
our operating segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Operating Earnings(1) |
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Gypsum Wallboard |
|
$ |
479,134 |
|
|
$ |
350,101 |
|
|
$ |
154,227 |
|
|
$ |
81,616 |
|
Cement |
|
|
285,289 |
|
|
|
211,343 |
|
|
|
78,311 |
|
|
|
57,616 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
133,482 |
|
|
|
125,184 |
|
|
|
20,087 |
|
|
|
25,406 |
|
Concrete and Aggregates |
|
|
89,778 |
|
|
|
70,786 |
|
|
|
9,613 |
|
|
|
7,742 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
2,279 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
1,539 |
|
|
|
(721 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
989,962 |
|
|
|
757,607 |
|
|
$ |
263,777 |
|
|
$ |
171,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Intersegment Revenues |
|
|
(65,096 |
) |
|
|
(58,812 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Joint Venture Revenues |
|
|
(65,164 |
) |
|
|
(82,254 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
859,702 |
|
|
$ |
616,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Prior to Corporate General and Administrative and interest expense. |
Corporate Overhead. Corporate general and administrative expenses for fiscal 2006 were
$16.4 million compared to $10.3 million for last fiscal year. The increase was primarily the
result of increased headcount and higher compensation and benefit costs, including the expensing of
employee stock compensation in accordance with a change in accounting standards.
Other Income. Other income consists of a variety of items that are non-segment operating in
nature and includes clinker sales income, non-inventoried aggregates income, gypsum wallboard
distribution center income, asset sales and other miscellaneous income and cost items.
Net Interest Expense. Net interest expense of $6.3 million for fiscal 2006 increased $3.1
million from fiscal 2005 due to increased borrowings.
Income Taxes. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2006 increased to 33.2% from 32.5% primarily
due to an increase in state income tax expense partially offset by a revision of certain estimates
utilized by the Company for permanent items included within the corporate tax filings and the new
domestic production activities deduction.
Net Income. As a result of the foregoing, pre-tax earnings of $241.1 million were 52% above
fiscal 2005 pre-tax earnings of $158.1 million. Fiscal 2006 net earnings of $161.0 million
increased 51% from net earnings of $106.7 million in fiscal 2005. Diluted earnings per share in
fiscal 2006 of $3.02 were 58% higher than the $1.91 for fiscal 2005.
24
GYPSUM WALLBOARD OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Revenues, as reported |
|
$ |
479,134 |
|
|
$ |
350,101 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
Freight and Delivery Costs billed to customers |
|
|
(89,374 |
) |
|
|
(73,140 |
) |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues |
|
$ |
389,760 |
|
|
$ |
276,961 |
|
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Volume (MMSF) |
|
|
2,832 |
|
|
|
2,547 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Average Net Sales Price (1) |
|
$ |
137.65 |
|
|
$ |
108.74 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
Unit Costs |
|
$ |
83.17 |
|
|
$ |
76.70 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
Operating Margin |
|
$ |
54.48 |
|
|
$ |
32.04 |
|
|
|
70 |
% |
Operating Earnings |
|
$ |
154,227 |
|
|
$ |
81,616 |
|
|
|
89 |
% |
Freight per MSF |
|
$ |
31.57 |
|
|
$ |
28.72 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net of freight per MSF. |
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
Price increases throughout the year and record Company
wallboard shipments positively impacted revenues for
fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005. Pricing has
continued to strengthen as consumption was at an
all-time high resulting in the near full capacity
utilization of the U.S. wallboard industry. Our sales
volume of 2,832 MMSF represents a record for the
Company as the Company operated at full capacity. |
|
|
|
Operating Margins:
|
|
Operating margins were impacted by increasing paper
costs and transportation costs for raw materials, as
well as natural gas costs which increased 43% in fiscal
2006 as compared to fiscal 2005. On a per unit basis,
freight costs, which are deducted to determine average
net sales price, have increased 10% from fiscal 2005.
Operating earnings for fiscal 2006 represented the
highest earnings in Company history. |
|
|
|
Outlook:
|
|
Throughout fiscal 2006 industry utilization rates
averaged about 95% and as a result pricing has remained
strong in all of the markets we serve. We implemented
a 10% price increase in late March 2006, which helped
us achieve an average net sales price of approximately
$165.00 during April 2006. Demand remains strong with
supply being currently allocated. Single family
residential housing is expected to decline during
fiscal 2007 at an estimated rate of 5% to 10%; however,
we anticipate that commercial construction and repair
and remodel demand will remain strong. Expected
capacity additions during fiscal 2007 are not expected
to be significant; therefore industry utilization, even
with the anticipated decline in single family
residential housing, is expected to remain high. |
25
CEMENT OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Revenues, including intersegment |
|
$ |
285,289 |
|
|
$ |
211,343 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
Freight and Delivery Costs billed to customers |
|
|
(19,212 |
) |
|
|
(16,499 |
) |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues |
|
$ |
266,077 |
|
|
$ |
194,844 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Volume (M Tons) |
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
Average Net Sales Price |
|
$ |
83.15 |
|
|
$ |
70.77 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
Unit Costs (including imports and
purchased cement) |
|
$ |
58.68 |
|
|
$ |
49.84 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
Operating Margin |
|
$ |
24.47 |
|
|
$ |
20.93 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
Operating Earnings |
|
$ |
78,311 |
|
|
$ |
57,616 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
Price increases were implemented throughout the fiscal
year, which resulted in a 17% increase in average sales
prices for fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005.
Sales volume was greater due to our purchase of the
remaining 50% interest in Illinois Cement Company
during January 2005, which resulted in our
consolidating all of the sales revenue from Illinois in
fiscal 2006, and only 50% for the majority of fiscal
2005. Additionally, consumption was at an all-time
high due to several favorable market factors, such as
increased construction spending and very favorable
weather conditions in our markets. |
|
|
|
Operating Margins:
|
|
Operating margins increased during fiscal 2006 as
compared to fiscal 2005, primarily due to increased
sales prices. The increases in sales prices were
slightly offset by increased volumes of low margin
purchased cement, which increased to 675,000 tons in
fiscal 2006 from 402,000 tons in fiscal 2005, an
increase of 68%. Additionally, fuel and energy costs
increased 20% over the prior year period due primarily
to increased cost of petroleum coke and coal and
electricity. |
|
|
|
Outlook:
|
|
U.S. cement consumption remains strong as a result of
strong federal and state infrastructure projects,
strong housing activity and a recovering commercial
construction market. The passage of the $286.4
billion, six year federal highway transportation bill
SAFETEALU in July of 2005 represents a 40% increase
over the previous TEA 21 bill and is anticipated to
further strengthen the long-term demand for cement in
the U.S. The U.S. Government and the Government of
Mexico have entered into an agreement providing for the
elimination of the antidumping duties imposed by the
U.S. on cement imported from Mexico. The agreement
provides for a three year transition period during
which the volume of Mexican cement imported into the
southern tier of the U.S. will be limited to 3 million
metric tons per year and the antidumping duty imposed
on Mexican cement will be set at $3 per ton. This is
not expected to impact cement prices in the short term
as the Portland Cement Association estimates that the
current industry wide domestic production capacity is
25% short of domestic consumption. Additionally the
major Mexican cement producers also own a much larger
percentage of US domestic production than previously
when dumping occurred. In the near term, we expect
U.S. cement pricing to remain stable or increase due to
strong domestic consumption, increasing world demand
and historically high international freight costs for
imported cement. The Company has sold 100% of its
production for the last twenty years and anticipates
selling all of its fiscal 2007 production. |
26
RECYCLED PAPERBOARD OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Revenues, including intersegment |
|
$ |
133,482 |
|
|
$ |
125,184 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Freight and Delivery Costs billed to customers |
|
|
(2,587 |
) |
|
|
(3,048 |
) |
|
|
-15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues |
|
$ |
130,895 |
|
|
$ |
122,136 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Volume (M Tons) |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
Average Net Sales Price |
|
$ |
452.63 |
|
|
$ |
455.73 |
|
|
|
-1 |
% |
Unit Costs |
|
$ |
383.12 |
|
|
$ |
360.93 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Operating Margin |
|
$ |
69.51 |
|
|
$ |
94.99 |
|
|
|
-27 |
% |
Operating Earnings |
|
$ |
20,087 |
|
|
$ |
25,406 |
|
|
|
-21 |
% |
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
Paperboard achieved price increases in gypsum paper,
primarily as a result of previously established price
escalators in its contracts; however, prices declined
for trims, containerboard and B grade, which made up a
larger percentage of total sales in fiscal 2006
compared to fiscal 2005. Due to the change in sales
mix, average sales price declined slightly in fiscal
2006 as compared to fiscal 2005. Total sales volume
increased 8% due to a 16,000 ton increase in non-gypsum
paperboard and higher sales to our wallboard division.
Paperboard sales to our wallboard division were 114,000
tons at $57.5 million compared to 109,000 tons at $54.1
million for last fiscal year. |
|
|
|
Operating Margins:
|
|
Our operating margin per ton was adversely impacted by
increased sales of lower margin containerboard and B
grade paper during fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal
2005. Additionally, operating margins were adversely
impacted by increased natural gas, electricity and
repair costs, offset positively by reduced recovered
fiber costs. |
|
|
|
Outlook:
|
|
As a result of strong market demand, capital
improvements and improved operating efficiency, our
paperboard mill is currently producing at 150% of its
original design capacity. While we anticipate
continued strong demand for our products over the next
six to twelve months, continued increases in natural
gas and electricity costs over the next six months may
adversely affect operating earnings. |
27
CONCRETE AND AGGREGATES OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
CONCRETE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Revenues |
|
$ |
55,269 |
|
|
|
42,228 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Volume (M Yards) |
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
769 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Average Net Sales Price |
|
$ |
62.61 |
|
|
$ |
54.92 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Unit Costs |
|
$ |
55.37 |
|
|
$ |
51.01 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Operating Margin |
|
$ |
7.24 |
|
|
$ |
3.91 |
|
|
|
85 |
% |
Operating Earnings |
|
$ |
6,395 |
|
|
$ |
3,007 |
|
|
|
113 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AGGREGATES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Revenues, including intersegment |
|
$ |
34,509 |
|
|
$ |
28,558 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
Freight and Delivery Cost billed to customers |
|
|
(831 |
) |
|
|
(1,071 |
) |
|
|
-22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues |
|
$ |
33,678 |
|
|
$ |
27,487 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Volume (M Tons) |
|
|
5,714 |
|
|
|
5,196 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Average Net Sales Price |
|
$ |
5.89 |
|
|
$ |
5.29 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Unit Costs |
|
$ |
5.33 |
|
|
$ |
4.38 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
Operating Margin |
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
|
-38 |
% |
Operating Earnings |
|
$ |
3,218 |
|
|
$ |
4,735 |
|
|
|
-32 |
% |
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
Revenues increased for both concrete and aggregates
during fiscal 2006 due to increases in sales prices and
volumes due to strong construction activity in both the
Austin, Texas and Sacramento, California markets.
Aggregate pricing in Austin has increased by 18% during
fiscal 2006 from fiscal 2005. |
|
|
|
Operating Margins:
|
|
Increases in operating margins for concrete are due
primarily to increased sales prices in fiscal 2006 as
compared to fiscal 2005, partially offset by increased
raw materials (cement and aggregates) and delivery
costs. Operating margins for aggregates declined for
fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005, primarily due
to significantly higher mobile equipment maintenance
costs, as well as the timing of other plant maintenance
projects. |
|
|
|
Outlook:
|
|
Concrete pricing in the Austin, Texas market increased
during fiscal 2006 as a result of increased
construction activity in the region in both the
commercial and residential sectors. We expect improved
pricing in the Austin, Texas market and continued
strong pricing in the northern California market in
fiscal 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregates pricing in the Sacramento area is expected
to continue to remain strong in the near term due
primarily to demand outpacing capacity. Aggregates
pricing in the Austin, Texas market is anticipated to
increase moderately over the near term due to increased
levels of construction activity in the Austin area and
a changing mix in the products sold. |
28
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Certain of our critical accounting policies require the use of judgment in their application
or require estimates of inherently uncertain matters. Although our accounting policies are in
compliance with generally accepted accounting principles, a change in the facts and circumstances
of the underlying transactions could significantly change the application of the accounting
policies and the resulting financial statement impact. Listed below are those policies that we
believe are critical and require the use of complex judgment in their application.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. We assess long-lived assets in accordance with the
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment
or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. SFAS No. 144 requires that long-lived assets be reviewed for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets is measured by comparing the carrying amount
of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. These
evaluations for impairment are significantly impacted by estimates of revenues, costs and expenses
and other factors. If these assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized
is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the
assets.
Goodwill. Pursuant to SFAS No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill is no
longer subject to amortization. Rather, goodwill is subject to at least an annual assessment for
impairment by applying a fair-value-based test. We have elected to test for goodwill impairment in
the first quarter of each calendar year. The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process, which
requires management to make judgments in determining what assumptions to use in the calculation.
The first step of the process consists of estimating the fair value of each reporting unit based on
a discounted cash flow model using revenues and profit forecasts and comparing those estimated fair
values with the carrying value; a second step is performed, if necessary, to compute the amount of
the impairment by determining an implied fair value of goodwill. Similar to the review for
impairment of other long-lived assets, evaluations for impairment are significantly impacted by
estimates of future prices for our products, capital needs, economic trends and other factors.
Environmental Liabilities. Our operations are subject to state, federal and local
environmental laws and regulations, which impose liability for clean up or remediation of
environmental pollution and hazardous waste arising from past acts and require pollution control
and prevention, site restoration and operating permits and/or approvals to conduct certain of its
operations. We record environmental accruals when it is probable that a reasonably estimable
liability has been incurred. Environmental remediation accruals are based on internal studies and
estimates, including shared financial liability with third parties. Environmental expenditures
that extend the life, increase the capacity, improve the safety or efficiency of assets or mitigate
or prevent future environmental contamination may be capitalized. Other environmental costs are
expensed when incurred.
Estimation of Reserves and Valuation Allowances. We evaluate the collectibility of accounts
receivable based on a combination of factors. In circumstances when we are aware of a specific
customers inability to meet its financial obligation to the Company, the balance in the reserve
for doubtful accounts is evaluated, and if determined to be deficient, a specific amount will be
added to the reserve. For all other customers, the reserve for doubtful accounts is determined by
the length of time the receivables are past due or the status of the customers financial
condition.
29
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity.
The following table provides a summary of our cash flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities: |
|
$ |
242,423 |
|
|
$ |
188,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Acquisition Cost of Illinois Cement 50% Interest |
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Additional Investment in Joint Venture |
|
|
(12,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures and Other Investing Activities, net |
|
|
(136,869 |
) |
|
|
(72,929 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
|
|
(152,119 |
) |
|
|
(72,929 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess Tax Benefits Share Based Payments |
|
|
4,141 |
|
|
|
1,662 |
|
Addition to (Reduction in) Long-term Debt, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,200 |
|
Retirement of Common Stock |
|
|
(100,376 |
) |
|
|
(165,335 |
) |
Dividends Paid |
|
|
(34,665 |
) |
|
|
(21,312 |
) |
Proceeds from Stock Option Exercises |
|
|
3,045 |
|
|
|
2,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities |
|
|
(127,855 |
) |
|
|
(67,772 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash |
|
$ |
(37,551 |
) |
|
$ |
47,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $54.2 million increase in cash flows from operating activities for fiscal 2007 was
largely attributable to increased earnings of $41.2 million.
Working capital at March 31, 2007 was $65.6 million compared to $112.0 million at March 31,
2006. The decrease in working capital was due primarily to the reduction in cash.
Total debt remained consistent at $200.0 million at March 31, 2007 as compared to 2006.
Debt-to-capitalization at March 31, 2007, was 26.8% compared to 30.1% at March 31, 2006, while net
debt-to-capitalization was 25.1% and 23.8% at March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The
additional investment in joint venture related to the purchase of a 15% share in an import terminal
in Houston, Texas by Texas Lehigh Cement Company in September 2006.
The Internal Revenue Service (the IRS) issued a Notice of Proposed Adjustment to the Company
that proposes to disallow a portion of the depreciation deductions claimed by the Company during
fiscal years ended March 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003. The adjustment proposed by the IRS, if
sustained, would result in additional federal income taxes of approximately $30.5 million, plus
applicable interest and penalties, and may result in additional state income taxes, including
applicable interest and penalties. The Company believes it has substantial basis for its tax
positions and intends to vigorously contest the proposed adjustment. See Footnote (H) of the
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Based on our financial condition and results of operations as of and for the year ended March
31, 2007, along with the projected net earnings for fiscal 2008, we believe that our internally
generated cash flow coupled with funds available under the credit facility will enable us to
provide adequately for our current operations, dividends, capital expenditures and future growth
through the end of fiscal 2008. The Company was in compliance at March 31, 2007 and during the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, with all the terms and covenants of its credit agreements and
expects to be in compliance during the next 12 months.
30
Cash and cash equivalents totaled $17.2 million at March 31, 2007, compared to $54.8 million
at March 31, 2006.
Debt Financing Activities.
The Company entered into a $350.0 million credit facility on December 16, 2004. On June 30,
2006, we amended the Bank Credit Facility (the Bank Credit Facility) to extend the expiration
date from December 2009 to June 2011, and to reduce the borrowing rates and commitment fees.
Borrowings under the Bank Credit Facility are guaranteed by all major operating subsidiaries of the
Company. Outstanding principal amounts on the Bank Credit Facility bear interest at a variable
rate equal to LIBOR, plus an agreed margin (ranging from 55 to 100 basis points), which is to be
established quarterly based upon the Companys ratio of consolidated EBITDA to its consolidated
indebtedness. Interest payments are payable monthly or at the end of the LIBOR advance periods,
which can be up to a period of six months at the option of the Company. Under the Bank Credit
Facility, we are required to adhere to certain financial and other covenants, including covenants
relating to the Companys interest coverage ratio and consolidated funded indebtedness ratio. At
March 31, 2007, the Company had $342.3 million of borrowings available under the Bank Credit
Facility.
We entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (the Note Purchase Agreement) on November 15, 2005
related to our sale of $200 million of senior, unsecured notes, designated as Series 2005A Senior
Notes (the Senior Notes) in a private placement transaction. The Senior Notes are guaranteed by
substantially all of the Companys subsidiaries, were sold at par and were issued in three tranches
on November 15, 2005, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Interest Rate |
Tranche A |
|
$40 million |
|
November 15, 2012 |
|
5.25% |
Tranche B |
|
$80 million |
|
November 15, 2015 |
|
5.38% |
Tranche C |
|
$80 million |
|
November 15, 2017 |
|
5.48% |
Interest for each tranche of Senior Notes is payable semi-annually on the 15th
day of May and the 15th day of November of each year until all principal is paid for the
respective tranche.
Our obligations under the Note Purchase Agreement and the Senior Notes are equal in right of
payment with all other senior, unsecured debt of the Company, including our debt under the Bank
Credit Facility. The Note Purchase Agreement contains customary restrictive covenants, including
covenants that place limits on our ability to encumber our assets, to incur additional debt, to
sell assets, or to merge or consolidate with third parties, as well as certain cross covenants with
the Bank Credit Facility.
The Company paid all outstanding amounts and terminated its trade receivables securitization
facility (the Receivables Securitization Facility) in December 2005. The Receivables
Securitization Facility had been fully consolidated on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets
prior to cancellation.
Other than the Bank Credit Facility, the Company has no other source of committed external
financing in place. In the event the Bank Credit Facility were terminated, no assurance can be
given as to the Companys ability to secure a new source of financing. Consequently, if a balance
was outstanding on the Bank Credit Facility at the time of termination, and an alternative source
of financing cannot be secured, it would have a material adverse impact on the Company. None of
the Companys debt is rated by the rating agencies.
The Company does not have any off balance sheet debt except for operating leases. Other than
the Receivables Securitization Facility, which was terminated in December 2005, the Company did not
have any other transactions, arrangements or relationships with special purpose entities. Also,
the Company has no outstanding debt guarantees. The Company has available under the Bank Credit
Facility a $25 million Letter of Credit Facility. At March 31, 2007, the Company had $7.7 million
of letters of credit outstanding that renew annually. We are contingently liable for performance
under $8.1 million in performance bonds relating primarily to our mining operations.
31
Cash Used for Share Repurchases and Stock Repurchase Program.
See table under Item 5. Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities on page 16.
On November 7, 2006, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of an
additional 5,156,800 shares of common stock, raising our repurchase authorization to approximately
6,000,000 shares, of which 5,495,800 remain available at March 31, 2007. Share repurchases may be
made from time-to-time in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The timing and
amount of any repurchases of shares will be determined by the Companys management, based on its
evaluation of market and economic conditions and other factors.
Dividends.
Dividends paid in fiscal years 2007 and 2006 were $34.7 million and $21.3 million,
respectively. Each quarterly dividend payment is subject to review and approval by our Board of
Directors, and we will continue to evaluate our dividend payment amount on an ongoing basis.
During March 2007 we announced an increase in our annual dividend from $0.70 to $0.80 per share,
beginning with the July 2007 dividend payment.
Capital Expenditures.
The following table compares capital expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Land and Quarries |
|
$ |
6,323 |
|
|
$ |
2,067 |
|
Plants |
|
|
122,315 |
|
|
|
56,376 |
|
Buildings, Machinery and Equipment |
|
|
8,231 |
|
|
|
14,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital Expenditures |
|
$ |
136,869 |
|
|
$ |
72,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historically, we have financed such expenditures with cash from operations and borrowings
under our revolving credit facility. The increase in capital spending is due primarily to our
beginning construction on the wallboard plant in South Carolina. We expect to make capital
expenditures of approximately $125 million during fiscal 2008.
Contractual Obligations.
The Company has certain contractual obligations covering manufacturing, transportation and
certain other facilities and equipment. Future payments due, aggregated by type of contractual
obligation are set forth as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1 year |
|
|
1-3 years |
|
|
3-5 years |
|
|
More
than 5 years |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Contractual Obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt/Note Payable |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
Operating Leases |
|
|
8,443 |
|
|
|
1,937 |
|
|
|
2,006 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
3,976 |
|
Purchase Obligations |
|
|
17,882 |
|
|
|
7,584 |
|
|
|
10,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
226,325 |
|
|
$ |
9,521 |
|
|
$ |
12,304 |
|
|
$ |
524 |
|
|
$ |
203,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
Purchase obligations are non-cancelable agreements to purchase coal and natural gas, to
pay royalty amounts and capital expenditure commitments.
Based on our current estimates, we do not anticipate making any additional contributions to
our defined benefit plans for fiscal year 2008.
Inflation
and Changing Prices.
Inflation has not been a significant factor in the U.S. economy as the rate of increase has
moderated during the last several years. The Consumer Price Index rose approximately 2.5% in
calendar 2006, 3.4% in 2005, and 3.3% in 2004. Prices of materials and services, with the
exception of power, natural gas, coal, coke, and transportation freight, have remained relatively
stable over the three year period. During fiscal 2007, the Consumer Price Index for energy and
transportation rose approximately 4.4% and 1.7%, respectively. Strict cost control and improved
productivity have minimized the impact of inflation on our operations, as has the ability to
recover increasing costs by obtaining higher sales prices. The ability to increase sales prices to
cover future increases varies with the level of activity in the construction industry, the number,
size, and strength of competitors and the availability of products to supply a local market.
GENERAL OUTLOOK
See outlook within Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations on pages 18-28.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
See Footnote (A) to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 39.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain sections of this report including Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of
Operations and Financial Condition contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
Private Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the context
of the statement and generally arise when the Company is discussing its beliefs, estimates or
expectations. We specifically disclaim any duty to update any of the information set forth in
this report, including any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are made based
on managements current expectations and beliefs concerning future events and, therefore, involve a
number of risks and uncertainties. Management cautions that forward-looking statements are not
guarantees, and our actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the
forward looking statements. See Item 1A for a more detailed discussion of specific risks and
uncertainties.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in interest rates on our Bank Credit
Facility. From time-to-time we have utilized derivative instruments, including interest rate
swaps, in conjunction with our overall strategy to manage the debt outstanding that is subject to
changes in interest rates. At March 31, 2007 there were no outstanding borrowings under the Bank
Credit Facility. Presently, we do not utilize derivative financial instruments.
The Company is subject to commodity risk with respect to price changes principally in coal,
coke, natural gas and power. We attempt to limit our exposure to changes in commodity prices by
entering into contracts or increasing use of alternative fuels.
33
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Financial Information
|
|
|
|
|
Index to Financial Statements and Related Information |
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
34
Eagle
Materials Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Earnings
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gypsum Wallboard |
|
$ |
511,615 |
|
|
$ |
479,134 |
|
|
$ |
350,101 |
|
Cement |
|
|
235,717 |
|
|
|
213,980 |
|
|
|
125,480 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
74,662 |
|
|
|
75,935 |
|
|
|
71,076 |
|
Concrete and Aggregates |
|
|
95,860 |
|
|
|
88,374 |
|
|
|
69,691 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
4,547 |
|
|
|
2,279 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
922,401 |
|
|
|
859,702 |
|
|
|
616,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COSTS AND EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gypsum Wallboard |
|
|
313,530 |
|
|
|
324,907 |
|
|
|
268,484 |
|
Cement |
|
|
176,300 |
|
|
|
162,586 |
|
|
|
94,785 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
55,664 |
|
|
|
55,848 |
|
|
|
45,671 |
|
Concrete and Aggregates |
|
|
79,611 |
|
|
|
78,761 |
|
|
|
61,949 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
914 |
|
Corporate General and Administrative |
|
|
20,344 |
|
|
|
16,370 |
|
|
|
10,280 |
|
Interest Expense, net |
|
|
5,429 |
|
|
|
6,341 |
|
|
|
3,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
650,878 |
|
|
|
645,553 |
|
|
|
485,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF
UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES |
|
|
32,765 |
|
|
|
26,917 |
|
|
|
26,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
|
304,288 |
|
|
|
241,066 |
|
|
|
158,089 |
|
Income Taxes |
|
|
101,624 |
|
|
|
80,082 |
|
|
|
51,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET EARNINGS |
|
$ |
202,664 |
|
|
$ |
160,984 |
|
|
$ |
106,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
4.13 |
|
|
$ |
3.06 |
|
|
$ |
1.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
4.07 |
|
|
$ |
3.02 |
|
|
$ |
1.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIVIDENDS PER SHARE |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
35
Eagle
Materials Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
$ |
17,215 |
|
|
$ |
54,766 |
|
Accounts and Notes Receivable, net |
|
|
77,486 |
|
|
|
93,446 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
78,908 |
|
|
|
67,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
173,609 |
|
|
|
216,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment |
|
|
986,821 |
|
|
|
856,227 |
|
Less: Accumulated Depreciation |
|
|
(333,641 |
) |
|
|
(298,665 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, net |
|
|
653,180 |
|
|
|
557,562 |
|
Notes Receivable |
|
|
8,270 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
Investments in Joint Venture |
|
|
43,862 |
|
|
|
27,847 |
|
Goodwill and Intangible Assets |
|
|
70,218 |
|
|
|
67,854 |
|
Other Assets |
|
|
22,271 |
|
|
|
19,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
971,410 |
|
|
$ |
888,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable |
|
$ |
52,359 |
|
|
$ |
51,562 |
|
Accrued Liabilities |
|
|
55,665 |
|
|
|
53,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
108,024 |
|
|
|
104,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
117,340 |
|
|
|
119,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock, Par Value $0.01; Authorized 5,000,000 Shares; None Issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, Par Value $0.01; Authorized 100,000,000 Shares; Issued and
Outstanding 47,909,103 and 50,318,797 Shares, respectively. |
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
503 |
|
Capital in Excess of Par Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Losses |
|
|
(850 |
) |
|
|
(1,404 |
) |
Retained Earnings |
|
|
546,417 |
|
|
|
465,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
546,046 |
|
|
|
464,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
971,410 |
|
|
$ |
888,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
36
Eagle
Materials Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings |
|
$ |
202,664 |
|
|
$ |
160,984 |
|
|
$ |
106,687 |
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Earnings to Net Cash Provided
by Operating Activities, Net of Effect of Non-Cash Activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization |
|
|
40,040 |
|
|
|
38,599 |
|
|
|
34,496 |
|
Deferred Income Tax Provision |
|
|
(2,437 |
) |
|
|
888 |
|
|
|
17,942 |
|
Stock Compensation Expense |
|
|
5,521 |
|
|
|
2,820 |
|
|
|
1,470 |
|
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
|
|
(32,765 |
) |
|
|
(26,917 |
) |
|
|
(26,921 |
) |
Distributions from Joint Ventures |
|
|
29,000 |
|
|
|
27,250 |
|
|
|
30,917 |
|
Excess Tax Benefits from Share Based Payment Arrangements |
|
|
(4,141 |
) |
|
|
(1,662 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and Notes Receivable |
|
|
8,305 |
|
|
|
(23,109 |
) |
|
|
(12,483 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(11,109 |
) |
|
|
(4,317 |
) |
|
|
(6,948 |
) |
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities |
|
|
3,425 |
|
|
|
11,711 |
|
|
|
12,967 |
|
Other Assets |
|
|
(3,037 |
) |
|
|
2,119 |
|
|
|
868 |
|
Income Taxes Payable |
|
|
6,957 |
|
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
(1,793 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
|
|
242,423 |
|
|
|
188,246 |
|
|
|
157,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to Property, Plant and Equipment |
|
|
(136,869 |
) |
|
|
(72,929 |
) |
|
|
(22,373 |
) |
Proceeds from Asset Dispositions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,382 |
|
Additional Investment in Joint Venture |
|
|
(12,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of Illinois Cement 50% J.V. Interest |
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
|
|
(152,119 |
) |
|
|
(72,929 |
) |
|
|
(92,991 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess Tax Benefits from Share Based Payment Arrangements |
|
|
4,141 |
|
|
|
1,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Note Payable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,700 |
|
Repayment of Note Payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,800 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Long-term Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
54,000 |
|
Repayment of Long-term Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54,000 |
) |
|
|
(58,780 |
) |
Dividends Paid to Stockholders |
|
|
(34,665 |
) |
|
|
(21,312 |
) |
|
|
(22,203 |
) |
Retirement of Common Stock |
|
|
(100,376 |
) |
|
|
(165,335 |
) |
|
|
(43,754 |
) |
Proceeds from Stock Option Exercises |
|
|
3,045 |
|
|
|
2,013 |
|
|
|
3,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities |
|
|
(127,855 |
) |
|
|
(67,772 |
) |
|
|
(60,526 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET (DECREASE)
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(37,551 |
) |
|
|
47,545 |
|
|
|
3,685 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
|
54,766 |
|
|
|
7,221 |
|
|
|
3,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
17,215 |
|
|
$ |
54,766 |
|
|
$ |
7,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
37
Eagle
Materials Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in |
|
|
Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Excess of |
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Par Value |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
564 |
|
|
$ |
27,847 |
|
|
$ |
(591 |
) |
|
$ |
413,079 |
|
|
$ |
(1,877 |
) |
|
$ |
439,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,687 |
|
Stock Option Exercises |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,890 |
|
Tax Benefit-Stock Option Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,873 |
|
Dividends to Stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,040 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,040 |
) |
Amortization of Restricted Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
Retirement of Common Stock |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(33,606 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,506 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,133 |
) |
Accrued Pension Benefit Liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2005 |
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(557 |
) |
|
|
487,220 |
|
|
|
(1,842 |
) |
|
|
485,368 |
|
|
Net Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,984 |
|
Stock Option Exercises |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,015 |
|
Tax Benefit-Stock Option Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,662 |
|
Dividends to Stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,637 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,637 |
) |
Share Based Activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,687 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,696 |
|
Retirement of Common Stock |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(7,362 |
) |
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
(157,928 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(164,788 |
) |
Accrued Pension Benefit Liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2006 |
|
|
503 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
465,639 |
|
|
|
(1,404 |
) |
|
|
464,738 |
|
|
Net Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,664 |
|
Stock Option Exercises |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,045 |
|
Tax Benefit-Stock Option Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,141 |
|
Dividends to Stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,241 |
) |
Share Based Activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,521 |
|
Retirement of Common Stock |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(12,704 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(87,645 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,376 |
) |
Accrued Pension Benefit Liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
Decrease in Unfunded Pension Liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
479 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
546,417 |
|
|
$ |
(850 |
) |
|
$ |
546,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
38
Eagle Materials Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(A) Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Eagle Materials Inc. and its
majority-owned subsidiaries (EXP or the Company), which may be referred to as our, we or
us. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. EXP is a holding company
whose assets consist of its investments in its subsidiaries, joint ventures, intercompany balances
and holdings of cash and cash equivalents. The businesses of the consolidated group are conducted
through EXPs subsidiaries. The Company conducts one of its cement plant operations through a
joint venture, Texas Lehigh Cement Company L.P., which is located in Buda, Texas (the Joint
Venture). Investments in Joint Ventures and affiliated companies owned 50% or less are accounted
for using the equity method of accounting. The Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
has been included for the same period as the Companys March 31 year end. As discussed further in
Note (F), the Company completed the purchase of the other 50% of Illinois Cement Company on January
10, 2005, and amounts reflected herein include the operational results of Illinois Cement Company
from that date forward.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents include short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of
three months or less and are recorded at cost, which approximates market value.
Accounts and Notes Receivable
Accounts and notes receivable have been shown net of the allowance for doubtful accounts of
$3.3 million and $3.3 million at March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The Company performs
ongoing credit evaluations of its customers financial condition and generally requires no
collateral from its customers. The allowance for non-collection of receivables is based upon
analysis of economic trends in the construction industry, detailed analysis of the expected
collectibility of accounts receivable that are past due and the expected collectibility of overall
receivables. The Company has no significant credit risk concentration among its diversified
customer base.
Notes receivable at March 31, 2007 generally bear interest at the prime rate plus 0.5%, and
are payable in quarterly installments of $225 thousand, with any unpaid amounts, plus accrued
interest, due on October 17, 2011. The notes are collateralized by certain assets of the borrower,
namely property and equipment. The current portion of notes receivable is $1.1 million and $1.2
million at March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The weighted-average interest rate at March 31,
2007 and 2006 was 8.5% and 4.5%, respectively.
39
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of average cost (including applicable material, labor,
depreciation, and plant overhead) or market. Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Raw Materials and Materials-in-Progress |
|
$ |
22,286 |
|
|
$ |
15,494 |
|
Gypsum Wallboard |
|
|
6,378 |
|
|
|
6,621 |
|
Finished Cement |
|
|
12,640 |
|
|
|
10,978 |
|
Aggregates |
|
|
5,321 |
|
|
|
3,536 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
3,392 |
|
|
|
5,579 |
|
Repair Parts and Supplies |
|
|
25,300 |
|
|
|
23,962 |
|
Fuel and Coal |
|
|
3,591 |
|
|
|
1,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
78,908 |
|
|
$ |
67,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Major renewals and improvements are
capitalized and depreciated. Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is
provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of depreciable assets.
Depreciation expense was $38.8 million, $37.3 million and $33.7 million for the years ended March
31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Raw material deposits are depleted as such deposits are
extracted for production utilizing the units-of-production method. Costs and accumulated
depreciation applicable to assets retired or sold are eliminated from the accounts and any
resulting gains or losses are recognized at such time. The estimated lives of the related assets
are as follows:
|
|
|
Plants
|
|
20 to 30 years |
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
20 to 40 years |
|
|
|
Machinery and Equipment
|
|
3 to 20 years |
The Company periodically evaluates whether current events or circumstances indicate that
the carrying value of its depreciable assets may not be recoverable. At March 31, 2007 and 2006,
management believes no events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be
recoverable.
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
The Company evaluates the recoverability of its long-lived assets and certain identifiable
intangibles for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets is measured by comparing the
carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the
asset. Such evaluations for impairment are significantly impacted by estimates of future prices
for the Companys products, capital needs, economic trends in the construction sector and other
factors. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured
by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds their fair value. Assets to be
disposed of by sale are reflected at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to
sell.
40
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill. Pursuant to SFAS No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill is no
longer subject to amortization. Rather, goodwill is subject to at least an annual assessment for
impairment by applying a fair-value-based test. We have elected to test for goodwill impairment in
the first quarter of each calendar year. The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process, which
requires management to make judgments in determining what assumptions to use in the calculation.
The first step of the process consists of estimating the fair value of each reporting unit based on
a discounted cash flow model using revenues and profit forecasts and comparing those estimated fair
values with the carrying value; a second step is performed, if necessary, to compute the amount of
the impairment by determining an implied fair value of goodwill. Similar to the review for
impairment of other long-lived assets, evaluations for impairment are significantly impacted by
estimates of future prices for our products, capital needs, economic trends and other factors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Intangible Assets Subject to Amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer contracts |
|
15 years |
|
$ |
1,300 |
|
|
$ |
(549 |
) |
|
$ |
751 |
|
Permits |
|
40 years |
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
(1,180 |
) |
|
|
20,820 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets and goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
71,947 |
|
|
$ |
(1,729 |
) |
|
$ |
70,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Intangible Assets Subject to Amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer contracts |
|
15 years |
|
$ |
1,300 |
|
|
$ |
(463 |
) |
|
$ |
837 |
|
Permits |
|
40 years |
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
(630 |
) |
|
|
21,370 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets and goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
68,947 |
|
|
$ |
(1,093 |
) |
|
$ |
67,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in cement goodwill is related to the additional $3.0 million paid by the
Company to finalize the purchase of the remaining 50% interest in Illinois Cement Company.
Amortization expense of intangibles for the years ended March 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $637,000,
$637,000 and $167,000, respectively.
Other Assets
Other assets are primarily composed of prepaid assets, loan fees and financing costs, deferred
expenses, and deposits.
Income Taxes
The Company provides for deferred taxes on the differences between the financial reporting
basis and tax basis of assets and liabilities using existing tax laws and rates. Additionally, as
applicable, we recognize future tax benefits such as operating loss carry forwards, to the extent
that realization of such benefits is more likely than not.
Accrued Expenses
Included in accrued expenses are approximately $19.8 million and $16.6 million of accrued
incentive compensation at March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
41
Stock Repurchases
The Companys Board of Directors has approved a cumulative total of 31,610,605 shares for
repurchase. There are approximately 5,495,800 shares remaining under the Companys current
repurchase authorization at March 31, 2007. The Company repurchased and retired 2,706,791,
4,547,163 and 1,986,600 shares of Common Stock at a cost of $100.4 million, $165.3 million and
$43.8 million during the years ended March 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue from the sale of cement, gypsum wallboard, paperboard, concrete and aggregates is
recognized when title and ownership are transferred upon shipment to the customer. Fees for
shipping and handling are recorded as revenue, while costs incurred for shipping and handling are
recorded as expenses.
The Company classifies its freight revenue as sales and freight costs as cost of goods sold,
respectively. Approximately $105.5 million, $112.0 million and $85.9 million were classified as
cost of goods sold in the years ended March 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Comprehensive Income/Losses
A summary of comprehensive income for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 is
presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Net Earnings |
|
$ |
202,664 |
|
|
$ |
160,984 |
|
|
$ |
106,687 |
|
Other Comprehensive Income , net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Pension Liability Adjustments |
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income |
|
$ |
202,806 |
|
|
$ |
161,422 |
|
|
$ |
106,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2007, the Company has an accumulated other comprehensive loss of $0.85
million net of income taxes of $0.46 million, in connection with recognizing the difference between
the fair value of the pension assets and the projected benefit obligation. The minimum pension
liability relates to the accumulated benefit obligation in excess of the fair value of plan assets
of the defined benefit retirement plans discussed in Note (K).
Statements of Consolidated Earnings Supplemental Disclosures
Selling, general and administrative expenses of the operating units are included in costs and
expenses of each segment. Corporate general and administrative expenses include administration,
financial, legal, employee benefits and other corporate activities are shown separately in the
consolidated statements of earnings. Total selling, general and administrative expenses for each
of the periods are summarized as follows:
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Operating Units Selling G&A |
|
$ |
38,936 |
|
|
$ |
37,698 |
|
|
$ |
30,414 |
|
Corporate G&A |
|
|
20,344 |
|
|
|
16,370 |
|
|
|
10,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
59,280 |
|
|
$ |
54,068 |
|
|
$ |
40,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate G&A includes stock compensation expense. See Note (I) for more information.
Maintenance and repair expenses are included in each segments costs and expenses. The
Company incurred $63.7 million, $58.5 million and $40.9 million in the years ended March 31, 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively.
Other net revenues include lease and rental income, asset sale income, non-inventoried
aggregates sales income, distribution center income and trucking income as well as other
miscellaneous revenue items and costs which have not been allocated to a business segment.
Consolidated Cash Flows Supplemental Disclosures
Interest payments made during the years ended March 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were $11.5
million, $4.0 million and $2.4 million, respectively.
The Company made net payments of $97.0 million, $76.7 million and $32.4 million for federal
and state income taxes in the years ended March 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Earnings Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Weighted-Average Shares of Common Stock Outstanding |
|
|
49,090,010 |
|
|
|
52,599,080 |
|
|
|
55,241,025 |
|
Common Equivalent Shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed Exercise of Outstanding Dilutive Options |
|
|
1,492,045 |
|
|
|
1,816,865 |
|
|
|
1,755,357 |
|
Less Shares Repurchased from Proceeds of Assumed Exercised Options(1) |
|
|
(866,624 |
) |
|
|
(1,142,793 |
) |
|
|
(1,127,793 |
) |
Restricted Shares |
|
|
71,682 |
|
|
|
57,152 |
|
|
|
14,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Common and Common Equivalent Shares Outstanding |
|
|
49,787,113 |
|
|
|
53,330,304 |
|
|
|
55,883,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes unearned compensation related to outstanding stock options. |
There were 144,807 stock options at an average price of $49.73 that were excluded from
the computation of diluted earnings per share for the year ended March 31, 2007. There were no
anti-dilutive options for the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005.
Accounting For Stock-Based Compensation
Share Based Payments. Effective April 1, 2005, the Company adopted SFAS 123R, Share-Based
Payment utilizing the modified prospective approach. Under the modified prospective approach,
SFAS 123R applies to new awards and to awards that were outstanding on April 1, 2005 and are
subsequently modified or cancelled. Compensation expense for outstanding awards for which the
requisite service had not been rendered as of April 1, 2005, is recognized over the remaining
service period using the compensation cost calculated for pro forma disclosure purposes previously
under SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Prior periods were not restated to
reflect the impact of adopting the new standard.
43
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R the Company accounted for employee stock options using the
intrinsic value method of accounting prescribed by APB Opinion 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, as allowed by SFAS 123.
In accordance with SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, the Company discloses
compensation cost of stock options based on the estimated fair value at the date of grant. For
disclosure purposes employee stock options are valued at the grant date using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model and compensation expense is recognized ratably over the vesting period. The
weighted-average assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model to value the option awards in fiscal
2005 are as follows: dividend yield of 1.2%; expected volatility of 26.5%; risk-free interest rates
of 5.5%; and expected life of 10 years.
If the Company had recognized compensation expense for the stock option plans based on the
fair value at the grant dates for awards, pro forma net earnings would be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Net Earnings - |
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
106,687 |
|
Add stock-based employee compensation included in the
determination of net income as reported, net of tax |
|
|
1,091 |
|
Deduct fair value of stock-based employee compensation,
net of tax |
|
|
(3,334 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
104,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Share - |
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
1.93 |
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share - |
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
1.91 |
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
1.87 |
|
Prior to adopting SFAS 123(R), all tax benefits of deductions resulting from the exercise
of nonqualified stock options were presented as operating cash flows (reflected in income taxes
payable). SFAS 123(R) requires the cash flows resulting from excess tax benefits to be classified
as cash flows provided by financing activities. As a result of adopting FAS 123(R), excess tax
benefits have been classified as cash flows provided by financing activities.
New Accounting Standards
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). FIN 48 provides guidance on
the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken
in a tax return. FIN 48 requires that we recognize in the financial statements, the impact of a tax
position, if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the
technical merits of the position. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification,
interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosures, and transition. FIN 48 is
effective for the Company as of April 1, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact of this
standard on our consolidated financial statements.
44
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plansan amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)
(SFAS No. 158). SFAS No. 158 requires employers to recognize a net liability or asset and an
offsetting adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income to report the funded status of
defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans. SFAS No. 158 requires prospective
application; thus, the recognition and disclosure requirements are effective for our fiscal year
ended March 31, 2007. Additionally, SFAS No. 158 requires companies to measure plan assets and
obligations at their year-end balance sheet date. This requirement is effective for our fiscal year
ending March 31, 2009. Below is a summary of the impact of adopting SFAS No. 158 as of March 31,
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before |
|
|
|
|
|
After |
|
|
Application of |
|
|
|
|
|
Application of |
|
|
FAS 158 |
|
Adjustments |
|
FAS 158 |
|
|
( dollars in thousands) |
Long-term deferred income taxes |
|
$ |
679 |
|
|
$ |
(221 |
) |
|
$ |
458 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
458 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive losses |
|
|
1,262 |
|
|
|
(412 |
) |
|
|
850 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,262 |
|
|
$ |
(412 |
) |
|
$ |
850 |
|
(B) Spin-Off by Centex Corporation
In January 2004, the Company and Centex Corporation (Centex) completed a series of
transactions that resulted in the spin-off by Centex of its entire equity interest in the Company
(the Spin-off). As a result of the Spin-off, the Company is no longer affiliated with Centex.
(C) Property, Plant and Equipment
Cost by major category and accumulated depreciation are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Land and Quarries |
|
$ |
62,282 |
|
|
$ |
56,327 |
|
Plants |
|
|
766,172 |
|
|
|
734,853 |
|
Buildings, Machinery and Equipment |
|
|
71,260 |
|
|
|
31,813 |
|
Construction in Progress |
|
|
87,107 |
|
|
|
33,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
986,821 |
|
|
|
856,227 |
|
Accumulated Depreciation |
|
|
(333,641 |
) |
|
|
(298,665 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
653,180 |
|
|
$ |
557,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction in progress relates primarily to our construction of the gypsum wallboard
facility in Georgetown, South Carolina in fiscal 2007 and the expansion of the Illinois Cement
Company facility in fiscal 2006. The expansion of the Illinois Cement Company facility was
completed during November 2006. The construction of the gypsum wallboard facility in Georgetown,
South Carolina is expected to be completed and operational in December 2007 and requires additional
capital expenditures of approximately $70 million during fiscal 2008.
45
(D) Indebtedness
Long-term Debt is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Senior Notes |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
Less Current Maturities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long-term Debt |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average interest rate of Senior Notes during fiscal 2007 and 2006, and at
March 31, 2007 was 5.4%.
The weighted-average interest rate of bank debt borrowings during fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005
was 0%, 4.2% and 2.9%, respectively. The interest rate on the bank debt was 0% at March 31, 2007
and 2006.
The weighted-average interest rate of the note payable borrowings during fiscal 2006 and 2005
was 3.9% and 2.2%, respectively. The interest rate on note payable debt was 0% at March 31, 2006.
Maturities of long-term debt during the next five fiscal years are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Notes -
We entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (the Note Purchase Agreement) on November 15, 2005
related to our sale of $200 million of senior, unsecured notes, designated as Series 2005A Senior
Notes (the Senior Notes) in a private placement transaction. The Senior Notes, which are
guaranteed by substantially all of the Companys subsidiaries, were sold at par and were issued in
three tranches on November 15, 2005, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Interest Rate |
Tranche A |
|
$40 million |
|
November 15, 2012 |
|
|
5.25 |
% |
Tranche B |
|
$80 million |
|
November 15, 2015 |
|
|
5.38 |
% |
Tranche C |
|
$80 million |
|
November 15, 2017 |
|
|
5.48 |
% |
Interest for each tranche of Senior Notes is payable semi-annually on the 15th day
of May and the 15th day of November of each year until all principal is paid for the
respective tranche.
46
Our obligations under the Note Purchase Agreement and the Senior Notes are equal in right of
payment with all other senior, unsecured debt of the Company, including our debt under the Bank
Credit Facility. The Note Purchase Agreement contains customary restrictive covenants, including
covenants that place limits on our ability to encumber our assets, to incur additional debt, to
sell assets, or to merge or consolidate with third parties, as well as certain cross covenants with
the Bank Credit Facility. The Company was in compliance with all financial ratios and tests at
March 31, 2007 and throughout the fiscal year.
Pursuant to a Subsidiary Guaranty Agreement, substantially all of our subsidiaries have
guaranteed the punctual payment of all principal, interest, and Make-Whole Amounts (as defined in
the Note Purchase Agreement) on the Senior Notes and the other payment and performance obligations
of the Company contained in the Senior Notes and in the Note Purchase Agreement. We are permitted,
at our option, to prepay from time to time at least 10% of the original aggregate principal amount
of the Senior Notes at 100% of the principal amount to be prepaid, together with interest accrued
on such amount to be prepaid to the date of payment, plus a Make-Whole Amount. The Make-Whole
Amount is computed by discounting the remaining scheduled payments of interest and principal of the
Senior Notes being prepaid at a discount rate equal to the sum of 50 basis points and the yield to
maturity of U.S. treasury securities having a maturity equal to the remaining average life of the
Senior Notes being prepaid.
Bank Debt -
The Company entered into a $350.0 million credit facility on December 16, 2004. On June 30,
2006, we amended the Bank Credit Facility (the Bank Credit Facility) to extend the expiration
date from December 2009 to June 2011, and to reduce the borrowing rates and commitment fees.
Borrowings under the Bank Credit Facility are guaranteed by all major operating subsidiaries of the
Company. Outstanding principal amounts on the Bank Credit Facility bear interest at a variable
rate equal to LIBOR, plus an agreed margin (ranging from 55 to 100 basis points), which is to be
established quarterly based upon the Companys ratio of consolidated EBITDA, which is defined as
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, to its consolidated indebtedness.
Interest payments are payable monthly or at the end of the LIBOR advance periods, which can be up
to a period of six months at the option of the Company. Under the Bank Credit Facility, we are
required to adhere to certain financial and other covenants, including covenants relating to the
Companys interest coverage ratio and consolidated funded indebtedness ratio. At March 31, 2007
the Company had $342.3 million of borrowings available under the Bank Credit Facility.
The Bank Credit Facility has a $25 million letter of credit facility. Under the letter of
credit facility, the Company pays a fee at a per annum rate equal to the applicable margin for
Eurodollar loans in effect from time to time plus a one-time letter of credit fee in an amount
equal to 0.125% of the initial stated amount. At March 31, 2007, the Company had $7.7 million of
letters of credit outstanding.
Prior to December 15, 2004, the Company maintained a $250 million credit agreement (the Prior
Credit Facility) with a scheduled maturity of December 18, 2006. The borrowings under the Prior
Credit Facility were guaranteed by all major operating subsidiaries of the Company. At the option
of the Company, outstanding principal amounts on the Prior Credit Facility bore interest at a
variable rate equal to: (i) LIBOR, plus an agreed margin (ranging from 125 to 200 basis points),
which was to be established quarterly based upon the Companys ratio of consolidated EBITDA to its
consolidated indebtedness; or (ii) an alternate base rate which was the higher of (a) the prime
rate or (b) the federal funds rate plus 1/2% per annum, plus an agreed margin (ranging from 25 to 100
basis points). Interest payments were payable monthly or at the end of the LIBOR advance periods,
which could be up to a period of six months at the option of the Company. Under the Prior Credit
Facility, the Company was required to adhere to certain financial and other covenants, including
covenants relating to the Companys interest coverage ratio, consolidated funded indebtedness ratio
and minimum tangible net worth.
47
Receivables Securitization Facility
On February 20, 2004, the Company entered into a $50 million trade receivable securitization
facility (the Receivables Securitization Facility), which was funded through the issuance of
commercial paper and backed by a 364-day committed bank liquidity arrangement. The Receivables
Securitization Facility had a termination date of February 20, 2007, subject to a 364-day bank
commitment. The Receivables Securitization Facility was fully consolidated on the balance sheet.
Subsidiary company receivables were sold on a revolving basis first to the Company and then to a
wholly-owned special purpose bankruptcy remote entity of the Company. This entity pledged the
receivables as security for advances under the facility. The purpose of the Receivables
Securitization Facility was to obtain financing at a lower interest rate by pledging accounts
receivable. The Company terminated the Receivables Securitization Facility on December 9, 2005.
(E) Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes includes the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Current Provision - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
96,686 |
|
|
$ |
73,341 |
|
|
$ |
31,178 |
|
State |
|
|
7,375 |
|
|
|
5,853 |
|
|
|
2,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,061 |
|
|
|
79,194 |
|
|
|
33,460 |
|
Deferred Provision - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
(3,769 |
) |
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
19,359 |
|
State |
|
|
1,332 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
(1,417 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,437 |
) |
|
|
888 |
|
|
|
17,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
$ |
101,624 |
|
|
$ |
80,082 |
|
|
$ |
51,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effective tax rates vary from the federal statutory rates due to the following items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Earnings Before Income Taxes |
|
$ |
304,288 |
|
|
$ |
241,066 |
|
|
$ |
158,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes at Statutory Rate |
|
$ |
106,501 |
|
|
$ |
84,373 |
|
|
$ |
55,331 |
|
Increases (Decreases) in Tax Resulting from - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State Income Taxes, net |
|
|
5,316 |
|
|
|
3,972 |
|
|
|
(232 |
) |
Statutory Depletion in Excess of Cost |
|
|
(8,338 |
) |
|
|
(4,544 |
) |
|
|
(3,955 |
) |
Domestic Production Activities Deduction |
|
|
(2,799 |
) |
|
|
(2,281 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
944 |
|
|
|
(1,438 |
) |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
$ |
101,624 |
|
|
$ |
80,082 |
|
|
$ |
51,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective Tax Rate |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
48
The deferred income tax provision results from the following temporary differences in the
recognition of revenues and expenses for tax and financial reporting purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Excess Tax Depreciation and Amortization |
|
$ |
1,696 |
|
|
$ |
3,458 |
|
|
$ |
8,885 |
|
Bad Debts |
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
7,394 |
|
Uniform Capitalization |
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
187 |
|
Accrual Changes |
|
|
(2,211 |
) |
|
|
(666 |
) |
|
|
601 |
|
Other |
|
|
(2,273 |
) |
|
|
(1,914 |
) |
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2,437 |
) |
|
$ |
888 |
|
|
$ |
17,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of deferred income taxes are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Items Giving Rise to Deferred Tax Liabilities - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess Tax Depreciation and Amortization |
|
$ |
135,320 |
|
|
$ |
133,624 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,948 |
|
|
|
3,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,268 |
|
|
|
137,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Items Giving Rise to Deferred Tax Assets - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual Changes |
|
|
(17,551 |
) |
|
|
(15,340 |
) |
Bad Debts |
|
|
(1,945 |
) |
|
|
(2,119 |
) |
Uniform Capitalization |
|
|
(432 |
) |
|
|
(609 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,928 |
) |
|
|
(18,068 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Deferred Income Tax Liability |
|
$ |
117,340 |
|
|
$ |
119,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In fiscal 2005, the Company offset all of its $4.7 million alternative minimum tax credit
carryover against its regular tax liability. See Footnote (H) and the Liquidity and Capital
Resources discussion for additional information related to income taxes.
(F) Purchase of Illinois Cement Joint Venture
On January 11, 2005 we completed the purchase of the other 50% interest in Illinois Cement
Company Joint Venture for approximately $72 million in cash. Under the terms of the purchase
agreement, the Company was required to pay an additional $3.0 million if Illinois Cement Company
completed an expansion of the plant prior to January 11, 2010. The Company completed the expansion
of Illinois Cement Company in December 2006, and paid the additional $3.0 million during January
2007. The additional $3.0 million was recorded as an adjustment to the purchase price through
goodwill.
49
The allocation of the purchase price to the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities
assumed is summarized below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable, Inventories, and Other Current Assets |
|
$ |
6,493 |
|
Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment |
|
|
42,138 |
|
Intangible Assets permits |
|
|
22,000 |
|
Goodwill (tax deductible) |
|
|
8,359 |
|
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities |
|
|
(3,990 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
(G) Business Segments
We operate in four business segments: Gypsum Wallboard, Cement, Recycled Paperboard, and
Concrete and Aggregates, with Gypsum Wallboard and Cement being our principal lines of business.
These operations are conducted in the U.S. and include the mining of gypsum and the manufacture and
sale of gypsum wallboard, the mining of limestone and the manufacture, production, distribution and
sale of Portland cement (a basic construction material which is the essential binding ingredient in
concrete), the manufacture and sale of recycled paperboard to the gypsum wallboard industry and
other paperboard converters, the sale of readymix concrete and the mining and sale of aggregates
(crushed stone, sand and gravel). These products are used primarily in commercial and residential
construction, public construction projects and projects to build, expand and repair roads and
highways.
As further discussed below, we operate five gypsum wallboard reload centers, a gypsum
wallboard distribution center, four cement plants, eleven cement distribution terminals, four
gypsum wallboard plants, a recycled paperboard mill, nine readymix concrete batch plant locations
and two aggregates processing plant locations. The principal markets for our cement products are
Texas, northern Illinois (including Chicago), the Rocky Mountains, northern Nevada, and northern
California. Gypsum wallboard and recycled paperboard are distributed throughout the continental
U.S. Concrete and aggregates are sold to local readymix producers and paving contractors in the
Austin, Texas area and northern California.
During the periods covered by this report up to January 10, 2005, we conducted two out of four
of our cement plant operations through joint ventures, Texas Lehigh Cement Company L.P., which is
located in Buda, Texas and Illinois Cement Company, which is located in LaSalle, Illinois
(collectively, the Joint Ventures). For segment reporting purposes only, we proportionately
consolidate our 50% share of the cement Joint Ventures revenues and operating earnings, which is
consistent with the way management organizes the segments within the Company for making operating
decisions and assessing performance. On January 11, 2005 we completed the purchase of the
remaining 50% interest in Illinois Cement Company and, accordingly, the results of Illinois Cement
Company have been consolidated into our results from January 11, 2005 through March 31, 2005, and
all of fiscal 2006 and 2007. See Note (F) Purchase of Illinois Cement Joint Venture for further
discussion.
50
The Company accounts for intersegment sales at market prices. The following table sets forth
certain financial information relating to the Companys operations by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gypsum Wallboard |
|
$ |
511,615 |
|
|
$ |
479,134 |
|
|
$ |
350,101 |
|
Cement |
|
|
321,852 |
|
|
|
285,289 |
|
|
|
211,343 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
127,545 |
|
|
|
133,482 |
|
|
|
125,184 |
|
Concrete and Aggregates |
|
|
97,323 |
|
|
|
89,778 |
|
|
|
70,786 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
4,547 |
|
|
|
2,279 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,062,882 |
|
|
|
989,962 |
|
|
|
757,607 |
|
Less: Intersegment Revenues |
|
|
(63,959 |
) |
|
|
(65,096 |
) |
|
|
(58,812 |
) |
Less: Joint Venture Revenues |
|
|
(76,522 |
) |
|
|
(65,164 |
) |
|
|
(82,254 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
922,401 |
|
|
$ |
859,702 |
|
|
$ |
616,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Intersegment Revenues - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cement |
|
$ |
9,614 |
|
|
$ |
6,146 |
|
|
$ |
3,609 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
52,883 |
|
|
|
57,546 |
|
|
|
54,108 |
|
Concrete and Aggregates |
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
1,404 |
|
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
63,959 |
|
|
$ |
65,096 |
|
|
$ |
58,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cement Sales Volumes (M tons) - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholly-Owned |
|
|
2,388 |
|
|
|
2,381 |
|
|
|
1,566 |
|
Joint Ventures |
|
|
846 |
|
|
|
819 |
|
|
|
1,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,234 |
|
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Operating Earnings (Loss) - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gypsum Wallboard |
|
$ |
198,085 |
|
|
$ |
154,227 |
|
|
$ |
81,616 |
|
|
Cement |
|
|
92,182 |
|
|
|
78,311 |
|
|
|
57,616 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
18,998 |
|
|
|
20,087 |
|
|
|
25,406 |
|
Concrete and Aggregates |
|
|
16,249 |
|
|
|
9,613 |
|
|
|
7,742 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
4,547 |
|
|
|
1,539 |
|
|
|
(721 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-Total |
|
|
330,061 |
|
|
|
263,777 |
|
|
|
171,659 |
|
Corporate General and Administrative |
|
|
(20,344 |
) |
|
|
(16,370 |
) |
|
|
(10,280 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Before Interest and Income Taxes |
|
|
309,717 |
|
|
|
247,407 |
|
|
|
161,379 |
|
Interest Expense, net |
|
|
(5,429 |
) |
|
|
(6,341 |
) |
|
|
(3,290 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Before Income Taxes |
|
$ |
304,288 |
|
|
$ |
241,066 |
|
|
$ |
158,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cement Operating Earnings - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholly-Owned |
|
$ |
59,417 |
|
|
$ |
51,394 |
|
|
$ |
30,694 |
|
Joint Ventures |
|
|
32,765 |
|
|
|
26,917 |
|
|
|
26,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
92,182 |
|
|
$ |
78,311 |
|
|
$ |
57,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable Assets (1) - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gypsum Wallboard |
|
$ |
392,377 |
|
|
$ |
335,985 |
|
|
$ |
331,367 |
|
Cement |
|
|
309,974 |
|
|
|
257,976 |
|
|
|
212,022 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
171,735 |
|
|
|
179,776 |
|
|
|
181,854 |
|
Concrete and Aggregates |
|
|
61,181 |
|
|
|
46,799 |
|
|
|
37,135 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
36,143 |
|
|
|
68,380 |
|
|
|
17,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
971,410 |
|
|
$ |
888,916 |
|
|
$ |
780,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures (1) - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gypsum Wallboard |
|
$ |
86,946 |
|
|
$ |
3,271 |
|
|
$ |
5,791 |
|
Cement |
|
|
30,209 |
|
|
|
48,175 |
|
|
|
8,509 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
5,875 |
|
|
|
4,936 |
|
|
|
4,502 |
|
Concrete and Aggregates |
|
|
13,737 |
|
|
|
11,110 |
|
|
|
3,467 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
5,437 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,869 |
|
|
$ |
72,929 |
|
|
$ |
22,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gypsum Wallboard |
|
$ |
16,622 |
|
|
$ |
16,755 |
|
|
$ |
16,923 |
|
Cement |
|
|
10,889 |
|
|
|
9,955 |
|
|
|
6,064 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
8,326 |
|
|
|
8,075 |
|
|
|
8,026 |
|
Concrete and Aggregates |
|
|
3,345 |
|
|
|
2,986 |
|
|
|
2,810 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
40,040 |
|
|
$ |
38,599 |
|
|
$ |
34,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Basis conforms with equity method accounting. |
52
Segment operating earnings, including the proportionately consolidated 50% interest in
the revenues and expenses of the Joint Venture(s), represent revenues less direct operating
expenses, segment depreciation, and segment selling, general and administrative expenses. The
Company accounts for intersegment sales at market prices. Corporate assets consist primarily of
cash and cash equivalents, general office assets and miscellaneous other assets. The segment
breakdown of goodwill at March 31, 2007 and 2006 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Cement |
|
$ |
8,359 |
|
|
$ |
5,359 |
|
Gypsum Wallboard |
|
|
37,842 |
|
|
|
37,842 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
2,446 |
|
|
|
2,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
48,647 |
|
|
$ |
45,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in cement goodwill is related to the additional $3.0 million paid by the
Company to finalize the purchase of the remaining 50% interest in Illinois Cement Company.
Combined summarized financial information for the Joint Venture that is not consolidated is
set out below (this combined summarized financial information includes the total combined amounts
for the Joint Venture and not the Companys 50% interest in those amounts). As discussed
previously, the amounts below include the 50% interest in Illinois Cement through January 10, 2005,
the date we acquired the other 50%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
Revenues |
|
$ |
163,267 |
|
|
$ |
138,331 |
|
|
$ |
170,223 |
|
Gross Margin |
|
$ |
64,702 |
|
|
$ |
57,637 |
|
|
$ |
59,750 |
|
Earnings Before Income Taxes |
|
$ |
65,530 |
|
|
$ |
53,833 |
|
|
$ |
53,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
Current Assets |
|
$ |
48,826 |
|
|
$ |
36,056 |
|
Non-Current Assets |
|
$ |
49,991 |
|
|
$ |
29,104 |
|
Current Liabilities |
|
$ |
12,039 |
|
|
$ |
10,503 |
|
During September 2006, Texas Lehigh Cement Company purchased a minority interest in
Houston Cement Company, an importer of cement into the Houston, Texas market. The Company invested
an additional $12.3 million in Texas Lehigh Cement Company to fund its share of the investment in
Houston Cement Company.
(H) Commitments and Contingencies
The Company, in the ordinary course of business, has various litigation, commitments and
contingencies. Management believes that none of the litigation in which it or any subsidiary is
currently involved is likely to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial
condition or results of operations of the Company.
53
The Companys operations and properties are subject to extensive and changing federal, state
and local laws, regulations and ordinances governing the protection of the environment, as well as
laws relating to worker health and workplace safety. The Company carefully considers the
requirements mandated by such laws and regulations and has procedures in place at all of its
operating units to monitor compliance. Any matters which are identified as potential exposures
under these laws and regulations are carefully reviewed by management to determine the Companys
potential liability. Although management is not aware of any exposures which would require an
accrual under generally accepted accounting principles, there can be no assurance that prior or
future operations will not ultimately result in violations, claims or other liabilities associated
with these regulations.
The
Internal Revenue Service (the IRS) has been examining our federal income tax returns for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2001, 2002, and 2003. On
May 10, 2007, the IRS issued to the Company a Notice of Proposed Adjustment that proposes to reduce
the tax basis of, and disallow a portion of the depreciation deductions claimed by the Company with
respect to, assets acquired by the Company from Republic Group LLC in a transaction completed in
November 2000 (the Republic Assets). The Company believes it has a substantial basis for its tax
positions and intends to vigorously contest the proposed adjustment.
If sustained, the adjustment proposed by the IRS would result in additional federal income
taxes owed by the Company of approximately $30.5 million, plus applicable interest. In addition,
the IRS has informally indicated that it intends to impose statutory civil penalties. Moreover, for
taxable years subsequent to fiscal 2003, the Company also claimed depreciation deductions with
respect to the tax basis of the Republic Assets, as originally recorded. If challenged on the same
basis as set forth in the Notice of Proposed Adjustment, additional federal income taxes of
approximately $37 million, plus applicable interest and possible civil penalties, could be asserted
by the IRS for those periods. Also, additional state income taxes, interest, and civil penalties of
approximately $4 million would be owed by the Company for the fiscal years under exam and
subsequent taxable years if the IRS position is sustained.
The Notice of Proposed Adjustment is preliminary, as the IRS has not issued its final
examination report. The Company is continuing its discussions with the IRS examining officers in an
effort to reach a favorable resolution. If the Company is unable to reach a favorable resolution,
the Company intends to pursue an administrative appeal and, if necessary, resort to the courts for
a final determination. Given the preliminary nature of the proposed adjustment, the Company is
unable to predict with certainty the ultimate outcome or whether it will be required to make
material payments of tax, interest, and penalties to the IRS and state taxing authorities, and
therefore has not accrued any liabilities for possible federal or state income taxes, or applicable
interest and penalties, at March 31, 2007.
The Company has certain deductible limits under its workers compensation and liability
insurance policies for which reserves are established based on the undiscounted estimated costs of
known and anticipated claims. The Company has entered into standby letter of credit agreements to
secure funding obligation on retentions relating to workers compensation and auto and general
liability self-insurance. At March 31, 2007, the Company had contingent liabilities under these
outstanding letters of credit of approximately $7.7 million.
54
The following table compares insurance accruals and payments for the Companys operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Accrual Balances at Beginning of Period |
|
$ |
5,456 |
|
|
$ |
4,905 |
|
Insurance Expense Accrued |
|
|
3,331 |
|
|
|
4,603 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(3,205 |
) |
|
|
(4,052 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual Balance at End of Period |
|
$ |
5,582 |
|
|
$ |
5,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company is currently contingently liable for performance under $8.1 million in
performance bonds required by certain states and municipalities, and their related agencies. The
bonds are principally for certain reclamation obligations and mining permits. The Company has
indemnified the underwriting insurance company against any exposure under the performance bonds.
In the Companys past experience, no material claims have been made against these financial
instruments.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company executes contracts involving indemnifications
that are standard in the industry and indemnifications specific to a transaction such as sale of a
business. These indemnifications might include claims relating to any of the following:
environmental and tax matters; intellectual property rights; governmental regulations and
employment-related matters; customer, supplier, construction contractor and other commercial
contractual relationships; and financial matters. While the maximum amount to which the Company
may be exposed under such agreements cannot be estimated, it is the opinion of management that
these indemnifications are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Companys
consolidated financial position or results of operations. The Company currently has no outstanding
guarantees of third party debt.
The Companys paperboard operation, Republic Paperboard Company LLC (Republic), is a party
to a long-term paper supply agreement with St. Gobain pursuant to which Republic is obligated to
sell to St. Gobain 95% of the gypsum-grade recycled paperboard requirements for three of St.
Gobains wallboard plants. This amounts to approximately 35% to 40% of Republics output of
gypsum-grade recycled paperboard.
The Company has certain operating leases covering manufacturing, transportation and certain
other facilities and equipment. Rental expense for fiscal years 2007, 2006, and 2005 totaled $2.2
million, $2.4 million and $2.9 million, respectively. Minimum annual rental commitments as of
March 31, 2006, under noncancellable leases are set forth as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
Total |
2008 |
|
$ |
1,937 |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
708 |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
663 |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
635 |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
152 |
|
Thereafter |
|
$ |
4,348 |
|
(I) Stock Option Plans
The Company accounts for its stock option plans under FAS 123(R) and the associated
interpretations. Pro-forma footnote disclosure in accordance with SFAS 148 is presented in Note
(A) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.
55
Prior to January 2004, the Company had two stock option plans for certain directors, officers
and key employees of the Company: the Eagle Materials Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan
(the 1994 Plan) and the Eagle Materials Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan (the 2000 Plan). Under
both plans, option periods and exercise dates may vary within a maximum period of 10 years. Until
fiscal 2005, nearly all option grants were issued with vesting occurring near the end of the option
grants 10-year life; however, the option grants may qualify for early vesting, on an annual basis,
if certain predetermined performance criteria are met. The Company records proceeds from the
exercise of options as additions to common stock and capital in excess of par value. The federal
tax benefit, if any, is considered additional capital in excess of par value. No charges or
credits would be made to earnings unless options were to be granted at less than fair market value
at the date of grant.
On January 8, 2004, the Companys stockholders approved a new incentive plan (the Plan) that
is a combined amendment and restatement of the two existing stock option plans discussed above.
The number of shares available for issuance under the Plan has not increased from, and is the same
as, the total combined number of shares available for issuance under the two stock plans listed
above.
Long-Term Compensation Plans
Options. During the first and second quarters of fiscal 2006 and 2007, the Company granted a
target number of stock options to certain individuals that are earned, in whole or in part, by
meeting certain performance conditions related to both financial and operational performance during
the respective fiscal year. These stock options were valued at the grant date using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted-average assumptions used in the Black-Scholes
model to value the option awards in fiscal 2007 and 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Dividend Yield |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
Expected Volatility |
|
|
30.0 |
% |
|
|
23.0 |
% |
Risk Free Interest Rate |
|
|
4.93 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
Expected Life |
|
9 years |
|
7 years |
At the end of the fiscal year, one-third of the options granted during that year that are
earned based on the achievement of certain performance criteria become immediately vested, with the
remaining options vesting ratably on March 31 of the two succeeding years. The Company is
expensing the fair value of the options granted over a three year period, as adjusted for
forfeitures. For the years ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, we expensed approximately $3.9 million
and $1.9 million, respectively. At March 31, 2007, there was approximately $3.9 million of
unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding stock options which is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.8 years.
Options granted in fiscal 2005 are earned based on the achievement of certain performance
conditions, with one-third exercisable when earned and the rest becoming exercisable ratably over a
two year period subsequent to vesting. Prior to the adoption of FAS 123(R) on April 1, 2005, these
awards were determined to be variable awards and related expense was being recognized over the
associated performance period based on the intrinsic value of the options deemed probable of
vesting, measured at each quarter and year-end. For the year ended March 31, 2005, we expensed
approximately $406,000.
56
The following table represents stock option activity for the years presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Number |
|
Average |
|
Number |
|
Average |
|
Number |
|
Average |
|
|
of |
|
Exercise |
|
of |
|
Exercise |
|
of |
|
Exercise |
|
|
Shares |
|
Price |
|
Shares |
|
Price |
|
Shares |
|
Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options at Beginning of Year |
|
|
1,816,865 |
|
|
$ |
15.74 |
|
|
|
1,755,357 |
|
|
$ |
12.57 |
|
|
|
1,885,380 |
|
|
$ |
10.43 |
|
Granted |
|
|
150,364 |
|
|
$ |
49.16 |
|
|
|
346,191 |
|
|
$ |
30.84 |
|
|
|
279,600 |
|
|
$ |
23.01 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(263,489 |
) |
|
$ |
11.55 |
|
|
|
(175,156 |
) |
|
$ |
11.49 |
|
|
|
(409,623 |
) |
|
$ |
9.82 |
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(66,888 |
) |
|
$ |
25.78 |
|
|
|
(109,527 |
) |
|
$ |
19.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options at End of Year |
|
|
1,636,852 |
|
|
$ |
19.07 |
|
|
|
1,816,865 |
|
|
$ |
15.74 |
|
|
|
1,755,357 |
|
|
$ |
12.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Exercisable at End of Year |
|
|
1,366,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,225,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,402,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Fair Value of Options
Granted during the Year |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7.41 |
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at March 31,
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise |
|
Range of Exercise Prices |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Price |
|
$6.80 - $8.15 |
|
|
307,587 |
|
|
3.6 years |
|
$ |
7.41 |
|
|
|
300,572 |
|
|
$ |
7.39 |
|
$9.57 - $10.54 |
|
|
207,488 |
|
|
2.7 years |
|
$ |
10.29 |
|
|
|
204,722 |
|
|
$ |
10.30 |
|
$11.04 - $18.88 |
|
|
472,472 |
|
|
5.5 years |
|
$ |
12.21 |
|
|
|
441,737 |
|
|
$ |
12.21 |
|
$21.52 - $29.59 |
|
|
417,976 |
|
|
6.4 years |
|
$ |
25.65 |
|
|
|
333,821 |
|
|
$ |
25.02 |
|
$34.09 - $39.54 |
|
|
164,522 |
|
|
4.9 years |
|
$ |
37.18 |
|
|
|
85,892 |
|
|
$ |
36.30 |
|
$62.83 |
|
|
66,807 |
|
|
9.1 years |
|
$ |
62.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,636,852 |
|
|
5.1 years |
|
$ |
19.07 |
|
|
|
1,366,744 |
|
|
$ |
15.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2007 the aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding was
approximately $41.8 million. The aggregate intrinsic value of exercisable stock options at that
date was approximately $39.8 million.
During the year ended March 31, 2007, the total intrinsic value of options exercised was
approximately $9.5 million.
Restricted Stock Units. Below is a summary of restricted stock units awarded by the Company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
Awarded |
|
Earned |
|
Vested |
|
Unearned |
2005 |
|
|
51,951 |
|
|
|
51,951 |
|
|
|
51,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
70,895 |
|
|
|
55,046 |
|
|
|
36,698 |
|
|
|
15,849 |
|
2007 |
|
|
47,979 |
|
|
|
24,714 |
|
|
|
3,746 |
|
|
|
23,265 |
|
During fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007, the Company granted a target level of restricted stock
units to employees and directors during the first or second quarter of each fiscal year. The
ultimate number of
57
restricted stock units earned from the grant was based on the achievement of certain criteria
during the fiscal year, similar to the stock option grants described above. Unearned shares are
treated as forfeitures. The value of the shares granted is being amortized over five or three year
periods. Expense related to restricted stock units was $1.4 million, $0.9 million and $1.0 million
in fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. At March 31, 2007 there was approximately $2.2
million of unrecognized compensation cost from restricted stock units that will be recognized over
a weighted-average period of 3.5 years.
Shares available for future stock option and restricted stock unit grants were 2,580,869 at
March 31, 2007.
(J) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value of the Companys long-term debt has been estimated based upon the Companys
current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. The carrying
value of the Companys Senior Notes at March 31, 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tranche A |
|
|
|
$ |
39,749 |
|
|
|
Tranche B |
|
|
|
|
79,284 |
|
|
|
Tranche C |
|
|
|
|
79,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
198,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All assets and liabilities which are not considered financial instruments have been
valued using historical cost accounting. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents,
accounts and notes receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair
values due to the short-term maturities of these assets and liabilities.
(K) Pension and Profit Sharing Plans
The Company has several defined benefit and defined contribution retirement plans which
together cover substantially all of its employees. The Company is not a party to any
multi-employer pension plan. Benefits paid under the defined benefit plans covering certain hourly
employees are based on years of service and the employees qualifying compensation over the last
few years of employment. The Companys funding policy is to generally contribute amounts that are
deductible for income tax purposes.
The annual measurement date is March 31 for the benefit obligations, fair value of plan assets
and the funded status of the defined benefit plans.
As of January 10, 2005, the Company completed the acquisition of the other 50% of Illinois
Cement Company Joint Venture further discussed in Note (F). In conjunction with the preliminary
purchase price allocation the Company recorded an approximate $791,000 liability associated with
the difference between the Illinois Cement Companys plans projected benefit obligation and the
fair value of plan assets at the date of acquisition.
58
The following table provides a reconciliation of the obligations and fair values of plan
assets for all of the Companys defined benefit plans over the two year period ended March 31, 2007
and a statement of the funded status as of March 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Reconciliation of Benefit Obligations - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit Obligation at April 1, |
|
$ |
13,931 |
|
|
$ |
13,411 |
|
Service Cost-Benefits Earned During the Period |
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
497 |
|
Interest Cost on Projected Benefit Obligation |
|
|
836 |
|
|
|
767 |
|
Plan Amendments |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial (Gain) Loss |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
(358 |
) |
Benefits Paid |
|
|
(432 |
) |
|
|
(386 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit Obligation at March 31, |
|
|
15,089 |
|
|
|
13,931 |
|
Reconciliation of Fair Value of Plan Assets - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Plan Assets at April 1, |
|
|
12,246 |
|
|
|
10,455 |
|
Actual Return on Plan Assets |
|
|
1,151 |
|
|
|
1,190 |
|
Employer Contributions |
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
987 |
|
Benefits Paid |
|
|
(432 |
) |
|
|
(386 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Plans at March 31, |
|
|
13,781 |
|
|
|
12,246 |
|
Funded Status - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded Status at March 31, |
|
$ |
(1,308 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,685 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Amounts Recognized in the Balance Sheet Consist of - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued Benefit Liability |
|
$ |
(1,308 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,646 |
) |
Prepaid Benefit Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
Intangible Asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
486 |
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
|
|
1,308 |
|
|
|
2,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Amount Recognized |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
Projected Benefit Obligation |
|
$ |
15,089 |
|
|
$ |
13,931 |
|
Accumulated Benefit Obligation |
|
$ |
14,809 |
|
|
$ |
13,667 |
|
Fair Value of Plan Assets |
|
$ |
13,781 |
|
|
$ |
12,246 |
|
59
Net periodic pension cost for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
included the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Service Cost - Benefits Earned During the Period |
|
$ |
515 |
|
|
$ |
497 |
|
|
$ |
366 |
|
Interest Cost of Projected Benefit Obligation |
|
|
836 |
|
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
Expected Return on Plan Assets |
|
|
(979 |
) |
|
|
(842 |
) |
|
|
(529 |
) |
Recognized Net Actuarial Loss |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
Amortization of Prior-Service Cost |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Periodic Pension Cost |
|
$ |
677 |
|
|
$ |
802 |
|
|
$ |
708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the assumptions used in the actuarial calculations of the
present value of net periodic benefit cost and benefit obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Net Periodic Benefit Costs - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount Rate |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
Expected Return on Plan Assets |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
Rate of Compensation Increase |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Benefit Obligations - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount Rate |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Rate of Compensation Increase |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is an assumption reflecting the
anticipated weighted-average rate of earnings on the portfolio over the long-term. To arrive at
this rate, the Company developed estimates of the key components underlying capital asset returns
including: market-based estimates of inflation, real risk-free rates of return, yield curve
structure, credit risk premiums and equity risk premiums. As appropriate, these components were
used to develop benchmark estimates of the expected long-term management approach employed by the
Company, and a return premium was added to the weighted-average benchmark portfolio return.
The pension plans weighted-average asset allocation at March 31, 2007 and 2006 and the range
of target allocation are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of |
|
Percentage of Plan |
|
|
Target |
|
Assets at March 31, |
|
|
Allocation |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Asset Category - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Securities |
|
|
40 60% |
|
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
Debt Securities |
|
|
35 60% |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
Other |
|
|
0 5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
The Companys pension investment strategies have been developed as part of a
comprehensive asset/liability management process that considers the interaction between both the
assets and liabilities of the plan. These strategies consider not only the expected risk and
returns on plan assets, but also the detailed actuarial projections of liabilities as well as
plan-level objectives such as projected contributions, expense and funded status.
The principal pension investment strategies include asset allocation and active asset
management. The range of target asset allocations have been determined after giving consideration
to the expected returns of each asset class, the expected variability or volatility of the asset
class returns over time, and the complementary nature or correlation of the asset classes within
the portfolio. The Company also employs an active management approach for the portfolio. Each
asset class is managed by one or more external money managers with the objective of generating
returns, net of management fees that exceed market-based benchmarks. None of the plans hold any
EXP stock.
The Company does not expect to contribute to its defined benefit plans during fiscal 2008.
The Company had at March 31, 2007, a minimum pension liability of $1.9 million related to the
accumulated benefit obligation in excess of the fair value of the plan assets, prior to its
adoption of FAS 158.
The Company also provides a profit sharing plan, which covers substantially all salaried and
certain hourly employees. The profit sharing plan is a defined contribution plan funded by
employer discretionary contributions and also allows employees to contribute on an after-tax basis
up to 10% of their base annual salary. Employees are fully vested to the extent of their
contributions and become fully vested in the Companys contributions over a seven year period.
Costs relating to the employer discretionary contributions for the Companys defined contribution
plan totaled $3.1 million, $2.6 million and $2.4 million in fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
Employees who became employed by the Company as a result of a previous transaction are
provided benefits substantially comparable to those provided under the sellers welfare plans.
These welfare plans included the sellers 401(k) plan which included employer matching percentages.
As a result, the Company made matching contributions to its 401(k) plan totaling $0.1 million for
these employees during each of the fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005.
(L) Agreements with Centex Corporation
On January 30, 2004, the Spin-off of all of the Company shares owned by Centex was completed.
At the time of the Spin-off, the Company entered into the following agreements with Centex:
Administrative Services: In connection with the January 2004 Spin-off from Centex, the
Company entered into an amended and restated administrative services agreement with Centex Service
Company (CSC) that amended and restated a similar agreement with Centex entered into in 1994.
The Company paid CSC a fee of $16,750 per month for such services and reimbursed CSC for its
out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the performance of such services. The
administrative services agreement expired on December 31, 2005.
Intellectual Property: Under the terms of the intellectual property agreement, Centex granted
to the Company an exclusive, perpetual and royalty-free license to use all trademarks held by
Centex which relate primarily or exclusively to the Companys business. The Company purchased all
trademarks previously licensed under this agreement during fiscal 2007.
61
Tax Matters: In connection with the Spin-off from Centex, the Company has agreed to certain
undertakings, including that, for a period of two years after the date of the distribution of
Common Stock by Centex, it will maintain its status as a company engaged in the active conduct of a
trade or business, and will take no action to facilitate certain acquisitions of the Companys
stock. In addition, under Section 335(e) of the Internal Revenue Code, the distribution will be
taxable to Centex if the distribution is part of a plan or series of related transactions pursuant
to which one or more persons acquire directly or indirectly stock representing a 50% or greater
interest, based on either vote or value, in Centex or the Company. Acquisitions that occur during
the period beginning two years before the distribution and ending two years after the distribution
are subject to a rebuttable presumption that they are part of such a plan. If Centex becomes
subject to tax under Section 355(e), its tax liability will be based upon the difference between
the fair market value of the shares of Common Stock at the time of the distribution and its
adjusted basis in such stock at that time and this tax liability will be a significant amount.
If the Company fails to comply with any such undertakings, or takes any other action or fails
to take any other required action, and that failure to comply, action or omission contributes to a
determination that the distribution fails to qualify as a tax free distribution, the Company will
be required to indemnify Centex and the other members of the Centex group for all federal, state
and local taxes, including any interest, penalty or additions to tax, incurred or imposed upon
Centex or any other members of the Centex group and for any established tax liabilities of Centex
stockholders resulting from the distribution.
(M) Net Interest Expense
The following components are included in interest expense, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest Income |
|
$ |
(2,282 |
) |
|
$ |
(898 |
) |
|
$ |
(36 |
) |
Interest Expense |
|
|
11,278 |
|
|
|
7,747 |
|
|
|
2,852 |
|
Interest Capitalized |
|
|
(3,998 |
) |
|
|
(1,051 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other Expenses |
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense, net |
|
$ |
5,429 |
|
|
$ |
6,341 |
|
|
$ |
3,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income includes interest on investments of excess cash and interest on notes
receivable. Components of interest expense primarily include interest associated with the Prior
Credit Facility, the Bank Credit Facility, the Receivables Securitization Facility, the Senior
Notes and commitment fees based on the unused portion of the Prior Credit Facility and Bank Credit
Facility. Other expenses include amortization of debt issue costs and costs associated with the
Prior Credit Facility, the Bank Credit Facility, the Senior Notes and the Receivables
Securitization Facility.
(N) Hedging Activities
The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for trading purposes, but has
utilized them in the past to convert a portion of its variable-rate debt to fixed-rate debt and to
manage its fixed to variable-rate debt ratio. All derivatives, whether designated in hedging
relationships or not, are required to be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. If the
derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge, the effective portions of changes in the fair value
of the derivative are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) and are recognized in the
statement of earnings when the hedged item affects earnings. Ineffective portions of changes in
the fair value of cash flow hedges are immediately recognized in earnings.
62
(O) Stockholders Equity
On January 8, 2004, the Companys stockholders approved an amendment to the Companys
certificate of incorporation to increase the authorized number of shares of capital stock that the
Company may issue from 50,000,000 shares of common stock and 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock to
100,000,000 shares of common stock and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The amendment to the
Certificate of Incorporation became effective on January 30, 2004. The Companys Board of
Directors designated 40,000 shares of preferred stock for use in connection with the Rights
Agreement discussed below.
Effective February 2, 2004, the Company entered into a Rights Agreement as amended and
restated on April 11, 2006 (as amended and restated, Rights Agreement) that was approved by
stockholders at the Special Meeting of Stockholders held on January 8, 2004. In connection with
the Rights Agreement, the Board authorized and declared a dividend of one right per share of common
stock (the Common Stock). The Rights entitle the Companys stockholders to purchase Common Stock
(the Rights) in the event certain efforts are made to acquire control of the Company. There are
no separate certificates or market for the Rights.
The Rights are represented by and trade with the Companys Common Stock. The Rights will
separate from the Common Stock upon the earlier of: (1) a public announcement that a person has
acquired beneficial ownership of shares of Common Stock representing in the aggregate 15% or more
of the total number of votes entitled to be cast generally by the holders of Common Stock then
outstanding, or (2) the commencement of a tender or exchange offer that would result in a person
beneficially owning shares of Common Stock representing in the aggregate 15% or more of the total
number of votes entitled to be cast generally by the holders of Common Stock then outstanding.
Should either of these conditions be met and the Rights become exercisable, each Right will entitle
the holder to buy 1/1,000th of a share of the Companys Preferred Stock at an exercise
price of $140.00. Each 1/1,000th of a share of the Preferred Stock will essentially be
the economic equivalent of three shares of Common Stock.
Under certain circumstances, the Rights entitle the holders to buy the Companys stock or
shares of the acquirers stock at a 50% discount. The Rights may be redeemed by the Company for
$0.001 per Right at any time prior to the first public announcement of the acquisition of
beneficial ownership of shares of Common Stock representing 15% or more of the total number of
votes entitled to be cast generally by the holders of Common Stock then outstanding. If not
redeemed, the Rights will expire on January 7, 2014.
63
(P) Quarterly Results (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
First Quarter - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
259,974 |
|
|
$ |
204,798 |
|
Earnings Before Income Taxes |
|
|
89,756 |
|
|
|
50,182 |
|
Net Earnings |
|
|
59,092 |
|
|
|
34,908 |
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share |
|
|
1.16 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
Second Quarter - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
256,468 |
|
|
|
221,784 |
|
Earnings Before Income Taxes |
|
|
99,192 |
|
|
|
65,729 |
|
Net Earnings |
|
|
66,095 |
|
|
|
43,322 |
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share |
|
|
1.32 |
|
|
|
0.80 |
|
Third Quarter - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
214,179 |
|
|
|
211,515 |
|
Earnings Before Income Taxes |
|
|
61,351 |
|
|
|
58,866 |
|
Net Earnings |
|
|
40,917 |
|
|
|
38,987 |
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share |
|
|
0.83 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
Fourth Quarter - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
191,780 |
|
|
|
221,605 |
|
Earnings Before Income Taxes |
|
|
53,989 |
|
|
|
66,289 |
|
Net Earnings |
|
|
36,560 |
|
|
|
43,767 |
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
64
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Eagle Materials Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Eagle Materials Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of March 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements
of earnings, cash flows and stockholders equity, for each of the three years in the period ended
March 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company at March 31, 2007 and 2006, and the
consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended March 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note A to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its
method of accounting for stock-based compensation and post-retirement benefits effective April 1,
2005 and March 31, 2007, respectively.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting as of March 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our
report dated May 24, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Dallas, Texas,
May 24, 2007
65
|
|
|
ITEM 9. |
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
None.
|
|
|
ITEM 9A. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer
(CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures as defined in Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 13a-15(e) as
of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on these evaluations, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
are effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or
submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported
within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms.
During the Companys fourth quarter, there were no significant changes in internal controls
over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal controls over financial reporting.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations.
Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance
with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
MANAGEMENT REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The management of Eagle Materials Inc. (the Company) is responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Companys internal control over financial
reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. The Companys internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that:
|
|
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; |
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance that the transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and |
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the Companys assets that could have a material effect
on the financial statements. |
Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Companys management assessed the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of March 31, 2007. In making this assessment, management used the criteria
set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in
Internal Control Integrated Framework.
66
Based on its assessment using the COSO criteria, management believes that the Company
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting, as of
March 31, 2007.
The Companys independent registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report
on managements assessment of the Companys internal control over financial reporting, which
immediately follows this report.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Eagle Materials Inc.
We have audited managements assessment, included in the accompanying Management Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that Eagle Materials Inc. and subsidiaries maintained
effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2007, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Eagle Materials Inc.s management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the
companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and
procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately
and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have
a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
67
In our opinion, managements assessment that Eagle Materials Inc. and subsidiaries maintained
effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2007, is fairly stated, in all
material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, Eagle Materials Inc. and
subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of March 31, 2007, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Eagle Materials Inc. as of
March 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, cash flows, and
stockholders equity for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2007 of Eagle
Materials Inc. and our report dated May 24, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Dallas, Texas
May 24, 2007
|
|
|
ITEM 9B. |
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
None.
PART III
|
|
|
ITEM 10. |
|
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERANCE |
Except for the information below regarding our code of ethics, the information called for by
Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 is incorporated herein by reference to the information included and
referenced under the following captions in the Companys Proxy Statement for the Companys August
2, 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the 2007 EXP Proxy Statement):
|
|
|
Items |
|
Caption in the 2007 EXP Proxy Statement |
|
|
|
10
|
|
Named Executive Officers who are not Directors |
10
|
|
Election of Directors and Related Matters |
10
|
|
Stock Ownership-Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance |
10
|
|
Stock Ownership Code of Conduct |
11
|
|
Executive Compensation |
12
|
|
Stock Ownership |
13
|
|
Certain Transactions |
13
|
|
Election of Directors and Related Matters |
14
|
|
Relationship with Independent Public Accountants |
Code of Ethics. The policies comprising the Companys code of ethics (Eagle Ethics A Guide
to Decision Making on Business Conduct Issues) will represent both the code of ethics for the
principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer under
SEC rules, and the code of business conduct and ethics for directors, officers, and employees under
NYSE listing standards. The code of ethics is published on the corporate governance section of the
Companys website at www.eaglematerials.com.
Although the Company does not envision that any waivers of the code of ethics will be granted,
should a waiver occur for the principal executive officer, principal financial officer, the
principal accounting officer or
68
controller, it will be promptly disclosed on our internet site. Also, any amendments of the code
will be promptly posted on our internet site.
|
|
|
ITEM 11. |
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
See Item 10 above.
|
|
|
ITEM 12. |
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS |
See Item 10 above.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
The following table shows the number of outstanding options and shares available for future
issuance of options under the Companys equity compensation plans as of March 31, 2007. All of
the Companys equity compensation plan has been approved by the Companys shareholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining available for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
future issuance under |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities to |
|
|
Weighted average |
|
|
equity compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
be issued upon exercise |
|
|
exercise price of |
|
|
plans excluding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of outstanding options, |
|
|
outstanding options, |
|
|
securities reflected in |
|
|
|
Incentive |
|
|
warrants and rights |
|
|
warrants and rights |
|
|
column (a) |
|
Plan Category |
|
Plan |
|
|
(a) |
|
|
(b) |
|
|
(c) |
|
Equity compensation plans
approved by stockholders |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
1,636,852 |
|
|
$ |
19.07 |
|
|
|
2,580,869 |
|
Equity compensation plans
not approved by shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,636,852 |
|
|
$ |
19.07 |
|
|
|
2,580,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 13. |
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE |
See Item 10 above.
|
|
|
ITEM 14. |
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES |
See Item 10 above.
69
PART IV
|
|
|
ITEM 15. |
|
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES |
|
a) |
|
The following documents are filed as part of this Report: |
|
(1) |
|
Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
Reference is made to the Index to Financial Statements under Item 8 in Part
II hereof, where these documents are listed. |
|
|
(2) |
|
Schedules |
|
|
|
|
Schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or not required or the
information required to be set forth therein is included in the consolidated
financial statements referenced above in section (a) (1) of this Item 15. |
|
|
(3) |
|
Exhibits |
|
|
|
|
The information on exhibits required by this Item 15 is set forth in the
Eagle Materials Inc. Index to Exhibits appearing on pages 73-75 of this
Report. |
70
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
EAGLE MATERIALS INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
Registrant |
|
|
|
May 29, 2007
|
|
/s/ STEVEN R. ROWLEY |
|
|
|
|
|
Steven R. Rowley, Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
May 29, 2007
|
|
/s/ STEVEN R. ROWLEY |
|
|
|
|
|
Steven R. Rowley |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
May 29, 2007
|
|
/s/ ARTHUR R. ZUNKER, JR. |
|
|
|
|
|
Arthur R. Zunker, Jr., Senior Vice President |
|
|
Finance and Treasurer |
|
|
(principal financial and accounting officer) |
|
|
|
May 29, 2007
|
|
/s/ F. WILLIAM BARNETT |
|
|
|
|
|
F. William Barnett, Director |
|
|
|
May 29, 2007
|
|
/s/ ROBERT L. CLARKE |
|
|
|
|
|
Robert L. Clarke, Director |
|
|
|
May 29, 2007
|
|
/s/ O. GREG DAGNAN |
|
|
|
|
|
O. Greg Dagnan, Director |
71
|
|
|
May 29, 2007
|
|
/s/ LAURENCE E. HIRSCH |
|
|
|
|
|
Laurence E. Hirsch, Director |
|
|
|
May 29, 2007
|
|
/s/ FRANK W. MARESH |
|
|
|
|
|
Frank W. Maresh, Director |
|
|
|
May 29, 2007
|
|
/s/ MICHAEL R. NICOLAIS |
|
|
|
|
|
Michael R. Nicolais, Director |
|
|
|
May 29, 2007
|
|
/s/ DAVID W. QUINN |
|
|
|
|
|
David W. Quinn, Director |
|
|
|
May 29, 2007
|
|
/s/ RICHARD R. STEWART |
|
|
|
|
|
Richard R. Stewart, Director |
72
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
EAGLE MATERIALS INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibits |
|
2.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 4, 2003, among
Centex Corporation, Centex Construction Products, Inc. (now known as Eagle Materials Inc.)
and ARG Merger Corporation filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K/A
filed with the Securities Exchange Commission (the Commission) on November 12, 2003 and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Distribution Agreement dated as of November 4, 2003 between Centex
Corporation and Centex Construction Products, Inc. (now known as Eagle Materials Inc.) filed
as Exhibit 2.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the Commission on
November 12, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current Report
on Form 8-K for the filed with the Commission on April 11, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Restated Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series A Preferred Stock
filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on
April 11, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
3.3*
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws. |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of December 16, 2004 among Eagle Materials
Inc., the lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Administrative Agent, Bank of
America, N.A. and PNC Bank, N.A. as Co-Syndication Agents, and Sun Trust Bank and Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. as Co-Documentation Agents, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 filed with the Commission on February 6, 2006
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Fifth Amendment to the Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement dated June 30, 2006, among Eagle Materials Inc. and the lenders party thereto, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as
administrative agent, Bank of America, N.A. and Branch Banking and Trust Company as co-syndication
agent and Wells Fargo Bank N.A. and Union Bank of California, N.A., as co-documentation agents filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 7,
2006 and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Sixth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated October 17, 2006 filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October
17, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Note Purchase Agreement dated as of November 15, 2005, among the Company and the purchasers
named therein filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with
the Commission on November 18, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of April 11, 2006, between Eagle Materials
Inc. and Mellon Investor Services LLC, as Rights Agent, filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the
Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form 8-A/A of the Company filed with the
Commission on April 11, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Joint Venture Interest Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 28, 2004, by and between
Eagle ICC LLC, Texas Cement Company and RAAM Limited Partnership filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 29, 2004 and
incorporated herein by reference. |
73
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibits |
|
10.2
|
|
Limited Partnership Agreement of Texas Lehigh Cement Company LP by and between Texas Cement
Company and Lehigh Portland Cement Company effective as of October 1, 2000 filed as Exhibit
10.2 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001
filed with the Commission on June 27, 2001 (the 2001 Form 10-K) and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
10.2 (a)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Agreement of Limited Partnership by and among Texas Cement Company,
TLCC LP LLC, TLCC GP LLC, Lehigh Portland Cement Company, Lehigh Portland Investments, LLC
and Lehigh Portland Holdings, LLC effective as of October 2, 2000 filed as Exhibit 10.2(a) to
the 2001 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
The Eagle Materials Inc. Incentive Plan filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 filed with the Commission on June 10,
2005. (1) |
|
|
|
10.3 (a)
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 30, 2004 and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
10.3 (b)
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (EBIT) filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 30, 2004 and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.3 (c)
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (ROE) filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 30, 2004 and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.3 (d)
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Director Stock Option Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 30, 2004 and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.3 (e)
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 filed with the Commission on August
9, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.3 (f)
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 filed with the Commission
on August 9, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.3 (g)
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Non-Employee Directors filed as Exhibit 10.1 to
the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 1, 2006 and
incorporated by reference herein. |
|
|
|
10.3 (h)
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Non-Employee Directors filed as Exhibit
10.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 1, 2006
and incorporated by reference herein. |
|
|
|
10.3 (i)
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Senior Executives filed as Exhibit
10.3 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 1, 2006
and incorporated by reference herein. |
|
|
|
10.3 (j)
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Senior Executives filed as
Exhibit 10.4 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August
1, 2006 and incorporated by reference herein. |
|
|
|
10.3 (k)
|
|
Eagle Materials Inc. Salaried Incentive Compensation Program for Fiscal Year 2007 (filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on May 15, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference). (1) |
|
|
|
10.3 (l)
|
|
Eagle Materials Inc. Cement Companies Salaried Incentive Compensation Program for Fiscal
Year 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference). (1) |
|
|
|
10.3 (m)
|
|
Eagle Materials Inc. Concrete and Aggregates Companies Salaried Incentive Compensation
Program for Fiscal Year 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference). (1) |
|
|
|
10.3 (n)
|
|
American Gypsum Company Salaried Incentive Compensation Program for Fiscal Year 2007 (filed
as Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on May 15, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference). (1) |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
The Eagle Materials Inc. Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan filed
as Exhibit 10.4 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March
31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference.(1) |
74
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibits |
|
10.4(a)
|
|
First Amendment to the Eagle Materials Inc. Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan, dated as of May 11, 2004, filed as Exhibit 10.4(a) to the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, filed with the Commission on
June 2, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference. (1) |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Trademark License and Name Domain Agreement dated January 30, 2004 between the Company and
Centex Corporation filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2004 filed with the Commission on June 14, 2004 (the 2004 Form
10-K) and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Tax Separation Agreement dated as of April 1, 1994, among Centex, the Company and its
subsidiaries filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the 1995 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Paperboard Supply Agreement, dated May 14, 1998, by and among Republic Paperboard Company
(n/k/a Republic Paperboard Company LLC), Republic Group, Inc., and James Hardie Gypsum, Inc.
filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the 2001 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference. Portions
of this Exhibit were omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the
Office of the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and each of its directors filed as
Exhibit 10.9 to the 2004
Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
21*
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Company. |
|
|
|
23.1*
|
|
Consent of Registered Independent Public Accounting Firm Ernst & Young LLP. |
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Eagle Materials Inc. pursuant to Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Eagle Materials Inc. pursuant to Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
|
|
|
32.1*
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Eagle Materials Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2*
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Eagle Materials Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
(1) |
|
Required to be identified as a management contract or a compensatory plan or
arrangement pursuant to Item 14(a)(3) of Form 10-K. |
75