e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number
1-33409
METROPCS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
20-0836269 |
(State or other jurisdiction
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
2250 Lakeside Boulevard |
|
|
Richardson, Texas
|
|
75082-4304 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(214) 570-5800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
On April 30, 2008, there were 348,496,235 shares of the registrants common stock, $0.0001 par
value, outstanding.
METROPCS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
* |
|
No reportable information under this item. |
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
MetroPCS
Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and per share information)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,310,729 |
|
|
$ |
1,470,208 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
65,475 |
|
|
|
109,139 |
|
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for
uncollectible accounts of $3,173 and $2,908
at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively) |
|
|
32,827 |
|
|
|
31,809 |
|
Prepaid charges |
|
|
51,336 |
|
|
|
60,469 |
|
Deferred charges |
|
|
37,331 |
|
|
|
34,635 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
4,920 |
|
|
|
4,920 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
21,657 |
|
|
|
21,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,524,275 |
|
|
|
1,732,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
2,038,194 |
|
|
|
1,891,411 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
28,049 |
|
|
|
36,050 |
|
FCC licenses |
|
|
2,072,895 |
|
|
|
2,072,895 |
|
Microwave relocation costs |
|
|
10,517 |
|
|
|
10,105 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
226,661 |
|
|
|
62,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
5,900,591 |
|
|
$ |
5,806,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
438,353 |
|
|
$ |
439,449 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
132,829 |
|
|
|
120,481 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
4,860 |
|
|
|
4,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
592,042 |
|
|
|
580,490 |
|
Long-term debt, net |
|
|
2,981,572 |
|
|
|
2,986,177 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
306,949 |
|
|
|
290,128 |
|
Deferred rents |
|
|
41,776 |
|
|
|
35,779 |
|
Redeemable minority interest |
|
|
5,335 |
|
|
|
5,032 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
89,399 |
|
|
|
59,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
4,017,073 |
|
|
|
3,957,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (See Note 13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per
share, 100,000,000 shares authorized; no
shares of preferred stock issued and
outstanding at March 31, 2008 and December
31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share,
1,000,000,000 shares authorized, 348,248,876
and 348,108,027 shares issued and
outstanding at March 31, 2008 and December
31, 2007, respectively |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,533,931 |
|
|
|
1,524,769 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
377,930 |
|
|
|
338,411 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(28,378 |
) |
|
|
(14,469 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,883,518 |
|
|
|
1,848,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
5,900,591 |
|
|
$ |
5,806,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
MetroPCS
Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
(in thousands, except share and per share information)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues |
|
$ |
561,970 |
|
|
$ |
439,516 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
100,384 |
|
|
|
97,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
662,354 |
|
|
|
536,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding depreciation and amortization
expense of $48,656 and $35,174, shown separately below) |
|
|
188,473 |
|
|
|
145,335 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
200,158 |
|
|
|
173,308 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding
depreciation and amortization expense of $8,644 and $4,206,
shown separately below) |
|
|
104,374 |
|
|
|
72,937 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
57,300 |
|
|
|
39,380 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
3,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
550,326 |
|
|
|
434,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
112,028 |
|
|
|
102,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
47,425 |
|
|
|
48,976 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
(9,888 |
) |
|
|
(7,157 |
) |
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
8,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense |
|
|
45,841 |
|
|
|
42,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
66,187 |
|
|
|
60,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(26,668 |
) |
|
|
(24,267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
39,519 |
|
|
|
36,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued dividends on Series D Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,180 |
) |
Accrued dividends on Series E Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(740 |
) |
Accretion on Series D Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
Accretion on Series E Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to Common Stock |
|
$ |
39,519 |
|
|
$ |
30,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
39,519 |
|
|
$ |
36,352 |
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
595 |
|
Unrealized loss on cash flow hedging derivative, net of tax |
|
|
(15,626 |
) |
|
|
(1,769 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) included in
net income, net of tax |
|
|
1,717 |
|
|
|
(1,042 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
25,610 |
|
|
$ |
34,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
348,164,091 |
|
|
|
157,035,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
354,568,227 |
|
|
|
163,447,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
MetroPCS
Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
39,519 |
|
|
$ |
36,352 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
57,300 |
|
|
|
39,380 |
|
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
Deferred rent expense |
|
|
5,997 |
|
|
|
2,039 |
|
Cost of abandoned cell sites |
|
|
1,668 |
|
|
|
1,796 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
8,465 |
|
|
|
4,211 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
1,096 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
3,050 |
|
Gain on sale of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(959 |
) |
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
Impairment loss on investments securities |
|
|
8,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
25,548 |
|
|
|
23,611 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
43,663 |
|
|
|
(13,976 |
) |
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(1,062 |
) |
|
|
2,482 |
|
Prepaid charges |
|
|
(18,038 |
) |
|
|
(5,431 |
) |
Deferred charges |
|
|
(2,696 |
) |
|
|
(1,445 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
2,206 |
|
|
|
(5,417 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(77,694 |
) |
|
|
8,119 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
12,344 |
|
|
|
15,141 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
107,449 |
|
|
|
111,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(183,614 |
) |
|
|
(156,235 |
) |
Change in prepaid purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
27,172 |
|
|
|
(1,654 |
) |
Cash used in acquisitions |
|
|
(18,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(321,322 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
404,551 |
|
Change in restricted cash and investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
556 |
|
Deposit to FCC for licenses |
|
|
(153,682 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Microwave relocation costs |
|
|
(635 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(329,359 |
) |
|
|
(74,104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in book overdraft |
|
|
65,734 |
|
|
|
38,281 |
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(740 |
) |
Cost of raising capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,288 |
) |
Repayment of debt |
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
62,431 |
|
|
|
32,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(159,479 |
) |
|
|
69,820 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
|
|
1,470,208 |
|
|
|
161,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
|
$ |
1,310,729 |
|
|
$ |
231,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
MetroPCS
Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation:
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements include the
balances and results of operations of MetroPCS Communications, Inc. (MetroPCS) and its
consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, the Company). MetroPCS indirectly owns, through its
wholly-owned subsidiaries, 85% of the limited liability company member interest in Royal Street
Communications, LLC (Royal Street Communications). The consolidated financial statements include
the balances and results of operations of MetroPCS and its wholly-owned subsidiaries as well as the
balances and results of operations of Royal Street Communications and its wholly-owned subsidiaries
(collectively Royal Street). The Company consolidates its interest in Royal Street in accordance
with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46-R, Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities, because Royal Street is a variable interest entity and the Company
will absorb all of Royal Streets expected losses. All intercompany accounts and transactions
between the Company and Royal Street have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
The redeemable minority interest in Royal Street is included in long-term liabilities. The
condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the condensed
consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income and cash flows for the periods ended
March 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related footnotes are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP).
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein reflect all
adjustments (consisting of normal, recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management,
necessary to state fairly the results for the interim periods presented. The results of operations
for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be
expected for any subsequent interim period or for the fiscal year.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
Federal Universal Service Fund (FUSF) and E-911 fees are assessed by various governmental
authorities in connection with the services that the Company provides to its customers. The
Company reports these fees on a gross basis in service revenues and cost of service on the
accompanying statements of income and comprehensive income. For the three months ended March 31,
2008 and 2007, the Company recorded approximately $25.9 million and $19.9 million, respectively, of
FUSF and E-911 fees. Sales, use and excise taxes are reported on a net basis in selling, general
and administrative expenses on the accompanying statements of income and comprehensive income.
On March 14, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors approved a 3 for 1 stock split of the
Companys common stock effected by means of a stock dividend of two shares of common stock for each
share of common stock issued and outstanding on that date. All share, per share and conversion
amounts relating to common stock and stock options included in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split.
On April 24, 2007, MetroPCS consummated its initial public offering (the Offering) of
57,500,000 shares of common stock priced at $23.00 per share (less underwriting discounts and
commissions). MetroPCS offered 37,500,000 shares of common stock and certain of MetroPCS existing
stockholders offered 20,000,000 shares of common stock in the Offering, which included 7,500,000
shares sold by MetroPCS existing stockholders pursuant to the underwriters exercise of their
over-allotment option. Concurrent with the Offering, all outstanding shares of preferred stock,
including accrued but unpaid dividends, were converted into 150,962,644 shares of common stock.
The shares began trading on April 19, 2007 on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol PCS.
On December 21, 2007, the Company executed an agreement with PTA Communications, Inc. (PTA)
to purchase 10 MHz of PCS spectrum from PTA for the basic trading area of Jacksonville, Florida.
The Company also entered into agreements with NTCH, Inc. (dba Cleartalk PCS) and PTA-FLA, Inc. for
the purchase of certain of their assets used in providing PCS wireless telecommunications services
in the Jacksonville market. Consummation
4
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
of both acquisitions is conditioned on customary closing
conditions and the license purchase agreement also requires approval by the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC). On January 17, 2008, the Company closed on the acquisition of certain assets
used in providing PCS wireless services. The Company paid a total of $18.6 million in cash for
these assets, exclusive of transaction costs. On February 27, 2008, the FCC issued a public notice
announcing the approval of the acquisition of the 10 MHz of spectrum. The Company plans to
consummate the acquisition of the 10 MHz license in the second quarter of 2008.
3. Share-Based Payments:
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment, (SFAS No. 123(R)), the Company has recognized stock-based compensation
expense in an amount equal to the fair value of share-based payments, which includes stock options
granted to employees. The Company records stock-based compensation expense in cost of service and
selling, general and administrative expenses. Stock-based compensation expense recognized under
SFAS No. 123(R) was $8.5 million and $4.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
2007, respectively. Cost of service for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 includes
$0.5 million and $0.2 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation. For the three months
ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, selling, general and administrative expenses include $8.0 million
and $4.0 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation.
On March 7, 2008, the Company granted stock options to purchase an aggregate of 5,393,065
shares of the Companys common stock to certain employees and non-employee directors. The exercise
price for the stock option grants is $16.20, which was equal to the Companys common stock closing
price on the New York Stock Exchange on the grant date. The stock options granted generally vest
on a four-year vesting schedule with 25% vesting on the first anniversary date of the award and the
remainder pro-rata on a monthly basis thereafter. The grant date fair value of these stock options
approximated $36.9 million.
4. Investments:
The Company has historically invested its substantial cash balances in, among other things,
securities issued and fully guaranteed by the United States or the states, highly rated commercial
paper and auction rate securities, money market funds meeting certain criteria, and demand
deposits. These investments are subject to credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risk. At
March 31, 2008, the Company had invested substantially all of its cash and cash equivalents in
money market funds consisting of treasury securities.
The Company holds investments of $133.9 million in certain auction rate securities some of
which are secured by collateralized debt obligations with a portion of the underlying collateral
being mortgage securities or related to mortgage securities. Consistent with the Companys
investment policy guidelines, the auction rate securities investments held by the Company all had
AAA/Aaa credit ratings at the time of purchase. With the liquidity issues experienced in global
credit and capital markets, the auction rate securities held by the Company at March 31, 2008 have
experienced continued failed auctions as the amount of securities submitted for sale in the
auctions has exceeded the amount of purchase orders. In addition, three auction rate securities
held by the Company have been placed on credit watch and three auction rate securities have been
downgraded from AAA/Aaa. As of May 9, 2008, the remaining auction rate securities held by the Company still retain a
AAA/Aaa rating as reported by Standard and Poors and Moodys Investors Service.
The estimated market value of the Companys auction rate security holdings at March 31, 2008
was approximately $28.0 million, which reflects a $105.9 million adjustment to the principal value
of $133.9 million. The estimated market value at December 31, 2007 was approximately $36.1
million, which reflected a $97.8 million adjustment to the principal value at that date. Although
the auction rate securities continue to pay interest according to their stated terms, based on
statements received from the Companys broker and an analysis of other-than-
temporary impairment factors, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $8.0 million during
the three months ended March 31, 2008, reflecting an additional portion of auction rate security
holdings that the Company has concluded have an other-than-temporary decline in value.
5
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Historically, given the liquidity created by auctions, the Companys auction rate securities
were presented as current assets under short-term investments on the Companys balance sheet.
Given the failed auctions, the Companys auction rate securities are illiquid until there is a
successful auction for them. Accordingly, the entire amount of such remaining auction rate
securities has been reclassified from current to non-current assets and is presented in long-term
investments on the accompanying balance sheets as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. If
uncertainties in the credit and capital markets continue or these markets deteriorate further, the
Company may incur additional impairments to its auction rate securities.
5. Property and Equipment:
Property and equipment, net, consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Construction-in-progress |
|
$ |
447,369 |
|
|
$ |
393,282 |
|
Network infrastructure |
|
|
2,036,941 |
|
|
|
1,901,119 |
|
Office equipment |
|
|
47,599 |
|
|
|
44,059 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
37,292 |
|
|
|
33,410 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
9,386 |
|
|
|
7,833 |
|
Vehicles |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,578,816 |
|
|
|
2,379,910 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(540,622 |
) |
|
|
(488,499 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
2,038,194 |
|
|
$ |
1,891,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. FCC Licenses and Microwave Relocation Costs:
The Company operates broadband PCS networks under licenses granted by the FCC for a particular
geographic area on spectrum allocated by the FCC for broadband PCS services. In addition, in
November 2006, the Company acquired a number of advanced wireless services (AWS) licenses which
can be used to provide services comparable to the PCS services provided by the Company, and other
advanced wireless services. The PCS and AWS licenses include the obligation to relocate existing
fixed microwave users of the Companys licensed spectrum if the use of the Companys spectrum would
interfere with their systems and/or reimburse other carriers (according to FCC rules) that
relocated prior users if the relocation benefits the Companys system. Accordingly, the Company
incurred costs related to microwave relocation in constructing its PCS and AWS networks. The PCS
and AWS licenses and microwave relocation costs are recorded at cost. Although PCS and AWS
licenses are issued with a stated term, ten years in the case of the PCS licenses and fifteen years
in the case of the AWS licenses, the renewal of PCS and AWS licenses is generally a routine matter
without substantial cost and the Company has determined that no legal, regulatory, contractual,
competitive, economic, or other factors currently exist that limit the useful life of its PCS and
AWS licenses. The carrying value of FCC licenses and microwave relocation costs was approximately
$2.1 billion as of March 31, 2008.
The Companys primary indefinite-lived intangible assets are its FCC licenses. Based on the
requirements of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, (SFAS No. 142) the Company
tests investments in its FCC licenses for impairment annually or more frequently if events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of its FCC licenses might be impaired.
The Company performs its annual FCC license impairment test as of each September 30th. The
impairment test consists of a comparison of the estimated fair value with the carrying value. The
Company estimates the fair value of its FCC licenses using a discounted cash flow model. Cash flow
projections and assumptions, although subject to a degree of uncertainty, are based on a
combination of the Companys historical performance and trends, its business plans and managements
estimate of future performance, giving consideration to existing and anticipated competitive
economic conditions. Other assumptions include the Companys weighted average cost of capital and
long-term rate of growth for its business. The Company believes that its estimates are consistent
with assumptions that marketplace participants would use to estimate fair value. The Company
corroborates its determination of fair value of the FCC licenses, using the discounted cash flow
approach described above, with other market-based valuation metrics. Furthermore, the
Company segregates its FCC licenses by regional clusters for the purpose of performing the
impairment test because each geographical region is unique. An impairment loss would be recorded
as a reduction in the carrying value of the related indefinite-lived intangible asset and charged
to results of operations.
6
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
The Company completed its impairment tests during the third quarter of 2007 and no impairment
has been recognized through March 31, 2008.
Auction 73
MetroPCS 700 MHz, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, submitted an upfront payment
on January 15, 2008 to the FCC in the amount of $153.7 million to qualify to participate in the
auction of 700MHz spectrum in Auction 73. Auction 73 concluded on March 18, 2008 and the FCC
announced that the Company was the high bidder, with a winning bid of approximately $313.3 million,
on a 10 MHz license covering a total population of approximately 8.3 million for the Boston
economic area, which is encompassed within the geographic boundaries of the Companys existing AWS
license for the Boston metropolitan area. On April 2, 2008, the Company filed its post-auction
application with the FCC to secure a final grant of the 700 MHz license, and on April 16, 2008, the
Company paid the FCC the remaining $159.6 million for the 700 MHz license. On April 22, 2008, the
FCC released a public notice accepting the Companys application for filing.
7. Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
63,993 |
|
|
$ |
131,177 |
|
Book overdraft |
|
|
91,133 |
|
|
|
25,399 |
|
Accrued accounts payable |
|
|
138,108 |
|
|
|
155,733 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
9,675 |
|
|
|
16,285 |
|
Payroll and employee benefits |
|
|
13,438 |
|
|
|
29,380 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
66,006 |
|
|
|
33,892 |
|
Taxes, other than income |
|
|
49,127 |
|
|
|
41,044 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
6,873 |
|
|
|
6,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
438,353 |
|
|
$ |
439,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Long-Term Debt:
Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
91/4% Senior Notes |
|
$ |
1,400,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,400,000 |
|
Senior Secured Credit Facility |
|
|
1,576,000 |
|
|
|
1,580,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
|
2,976,000 |
|
|
|
2,980,000 |
|
Add: unamortized premium on debt |
|
|
21,572 |
|
|
|
22,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
2,997,572 |
|
|
|
3,002,177 |
|
Less: current maturities |
|
|
(16,000 |
) |
|
|
(16,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
2,981,572 |
|
|
$ |
2,986,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91/4% Senior Notes
On November 3, 2006, MetroPCS Wireless, Inc, a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of MetroPCS
(Wireless), completed the sale of $1.0 billion of principal amount of 91/4% Senior Notes due 2014,
(the Initial Notes). The net proceeds of the sale of the Initial Notes were approximately
$978.0 million after underwriter fees and other debt issuance costs of $22.0 million. On June 6,
2007, Wireless completed the sale of an additional $400.0 million of 91/4% Senior Notes
(the Additional Notes and together with the Initial Notes, the 91/4% Senior Notes) under the
existing indenture at a price equal to 105.875% of the principal amount of such Additional Notes.
The 91/4% Senior Notes are unsecured obligations and are guaranteed by MetroPCS, MetroPCS, Inc.,
and all of Wireless direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, but are not guaranteed by Royal
Street. Interest is payable
7
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
on the 91/4% Senior Notes on May 1 and November 1 of each year.
Wireless may, at its option, redeem some or all of the 91/4% Senior Notes at any time on or after
November 1, 2010 for the redemption prices set forth in the indenture governing the 91/4% Senior
Notes. In addition, Wireless may also redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the
91/4% Senior Notes with the net cash proceeds of certain sales of equity securities.
Senior Secured Credit Facility
On November 3, 2006, Wireless entered into a secured credit facility, pursuant to which
Wireless may borrow up to $1.7 billion, as amended, (the Senior Secured Credit Facility). The
Senior Secured Credit Facility consists of a $1.6 billion term loan facility and a $100.0 million
revolving credit facility. On November 3, 2006, Wireless borrowed $1.6 billion under the Senior
Secured Credit Facility. The term loan facility is repayable in quarterly installments in annual
aggregate amounts equal to 1% of the initial aggregate principal amount of $1.6 billion.
The facilities under the Senior Secured Credit Facility are guaranteed by MetroPCS, MetroPCS,
Inc. and each of Wireless direct and indirect present and future wholly-owned domestic
subsidiaries. The facilities are not guaranteed by Royal Street, but Wireless pledged the
promissory note that Royal Street has given it in connection with amounts borrowed by Royal Street
from Wireless and the limited liability company member interest held in Royal Street
Communications. The Senior Secured Credit Facility contains customary events of default, including
cross defaults. The obligations are also secured by the capital stock of Wireless as well as
substantially all of Wireless present and future assets and the capital stock and substantially
all of the assets of each of its direct and indirect present and future wholly-owned subsidiaries
(except as prohibited by law and certain permitted exceptions), but excludes Royal Street.
The interest rate on the outstanding debt under the Senior Secured Credit Facility is
variable. The rate as of March 31, 2008 was 6.468%. On November 21, 2006, Wireless entered into a
three-year interest rate protection agreement to manage the Companys interest rate risk exposure
and fulfill a requirement of the Senior Secured Credit Facility. The agreement covers a notional
amount of $1.0 billion and effectively converts this portion of Wireless variable rate debt to
fixed-rate debt. On February 20, 2007, Wireless entered into an amendment to the Senior Secured
Credit Facility. Under the amendment, the margin on the base rate used to determine the Senior
Secured Credit Facility interest rate was reduced to 2.25% from 2.50%.
9. Fair Value Measurements:
In the first quarter of 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements, (SFAS No. 157) for financial assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 157 became effective
for financial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2008. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, thereby
eliminating inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior accounting pronouncements, and
increases disclosures surrounding fair value calculations.
SFAS No. 157 establishes a three-tiered fair value hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to
valuation techniques used in fair value calculations. The three levels of inputs are defined as
follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities
in active markets that the Company has the ability to access. |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active
markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive
markets; or valuations based on models where the significant inputs are observable
(e.g., interest rates, yield curves, prepayment speeds, default rates, loss severities,
etc.) or can be corroborated by observable market data. |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 - Valuations based on models where significant inputs are not
observable. The unobservable inputs reflect the Companys own assumptions about the
assumptions that market participants would use. |
SFAS No. 157 requires the Company to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the
use of
unobservable inputs. If a financial instrument uses inputs that fall in different levels of
the hierarchy, the instrument
8
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
will be categorized based upon the lowest level of input that is
significant to the fair value calculation. The Companys financial assets and liabilities measured
at fair value on a recurring basis include short-term investments securities and derivative
financial instruments.
Included in the Companys long-term investments securities are certain auction rate securities
some of which are secured by collateralized debt obligations with a portion of the underlying
collateral being mortgage securities or related to mortgage securities. Due to the lack of
availability of observable market quotes on the Companys investment portfolio of auction rate
securities, the fair value was estimated based on the Companys broker-dealer valuation models and
an internal analysis by management of other-than-temporary impairment factors. The broker-dealer
models considered credit default risks, the liquidity of the underlying security and overall
capital market liquidity. Management also looked to other marketplace transactions, and
information received from other third party brokers in order to assess whether the fair value based
on the broker-dealer valuation models was reasonable. The valuation of the Companys investment
portfolio is subject to uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Factors that may impact the
Companys valuation include changes to credit ratings of the securities as well as the underlying
assets supporting those securities, rates of default of the underlying assets, underlying
collateral values, discount rates, counterparty risk and ongoing strength and quality of market
credit and liquidity. Significant inputs to the investments valuation are unobservable in the
active markets and are classified as Level 3 in the hierarchy.
Included in the Companys derivative financial instruments are interest rate swaps.
Derivative financial instruments are valued in the market using discounted cash flow techniques.
These techniques incorporate Level 1 and Level 2 inputs such as interest rates. These market inputs
are utilized in the discounted cash flow calculation considering the instruments term, notional
amount, discount rate and credit risk. Significant inputs to the derivative valuation for interest
rate swaps are observable in the active markets and are classified as Level 2 in the hierarchy.
The following table summarizes assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis at March 31, 2008, as required by SFAS No. 157 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
28,049 |
|
|
$ |
28,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
28,049 |
|
|
$ |
28,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
46,138 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
46,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
46,138 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
46,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the changes in fair value of our Level 3 assets, as required by
SFAS No. 157 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements of Assets Using Level 3 Inputs |
|
Long-Term Investments |
|
Beginning balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
36,050 |
|
Total losses (realized or unrealized): |
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
8,001 |
|
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance at March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
28,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses for the three months ended March 31, 2008
included in earnings that are attributable to the
change in unrealized losses relating to those assets
still held at the reporting date as reported in
impairment loss on investment securities in the
condensed consolidated statements of income and
comprehensive income |
|
$ |
8,001 |
|
9
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
10. Income Taxes:
The Company records income taxes pursuant to SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes,
(SFAS No. 109). SFAS No. 109 uses an asset and liability approach to account for income taxes,
wherein deferred taxes are provided for book and tax basis differences for assets and liabilities.
As part of the Companys financial process, it must assess the likelihood that its deferred tax
assets can be recovered. If recovery is not likely, the provision for taxes must be increased by
recording a reserve in the form of a valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets that are
estimated not to be ultimately recoverable. In this process, certain relevant criteria are
evaluated including the existence of deferred tax liabilities that can be used to absorb deferred
tax assets, the taxable income in prior carryback years that can be used to absorb net operating
losses and credit carrybacks and taxable income in future years. The Companys judgment regarding
future taxable income may change due to future market conditions, changes in U.S. tax laws and
other factors. These changes, if any, may require material adjustments to these deferred tax
assets and an accompanying reduction or increase in net income in the period when such
determinations are made.
FASB Interpretation No. 48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, (FIN 48), clarifies
the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance
with SFAS No. 109. FIN 48 provides guidance on the financial statement recognition and measurement
of uncertain tax positions. FIN 48 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification,
interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosures, and transition issues. Since
the prior year-end, there have been no changes in the amount of our unrecognized tax benefits. The
Company did accrue interest expense during the three months ended March 31, 2008 on the
unrecognized tax benefit. Additionally, there have been no changes in the Companys determination
of the amounts that could significantly change within the next twelve months.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has notified Royal Street Communications of its intent to
examine the 2005 tax year of Royal Street Communications. Management does not believe the
examination will have a significant effect on the Companys tax position.
In addition, there are several state income and franchise tax examinations that are currently
in progress for the Company and/or certain of its subsidiaries for various tax years. Management
does not believe these examinations will have a significant effect on the Companys tax position.
11. Stockholders Equity:
Common Stock Issued to Directors
Non-employee members of MetroPCS Board of Directors receive compensation for serving on the
Board of Directors, as defined in MetroPCS Non-Employee Director Remuneration Plan (the
Remuneration Plan). In 2008, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors modified the
Remuneration Plan to be more competitive with the market and to be more reflective of the Companys
status as a public company. The previous plan provided that each non-employee directors annual
retainer may be paid, at the election of each non-employee director, in cash, common stock, or a
combination of cash and common stock. The modified Remuneration Plan provides that each
non-employee directors annual retainer will be paid in cash and each director will receive
options to purchase common stock. In accordance with the modified Remuneration Plan, no shares of
common stock were issued to non-employee members of the Board of Directors during the three months
ended March 31, 2008. During the three months ended March 31, 2007, non-employee members of the
Board of Directors were issued 31,230 shares of common stock as payment of their annual retainer.
10
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
12. Net Income Per Common Share:
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per common
share for the periods indicated (in thousands, except share and per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Basic EPSTwo Class Method: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
39,519 |
|
|
$ |
36,352 |
|
Accrued dividends and accretion: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series D Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,298 |
) |
Series E Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(825 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common stock |
|
$ |
39,519 |
|
|
$ |
30,229 |
|
Amount allocable to common shareholders |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
57.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights to undistributed earnings |
|
$ |
39,519 |
|
|
$ |
17,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstandingbasic |
|
|
348,164,091 |
|
|
|
157,035,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common sharebasic |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights to undistributed earnings |
|
$ |
39,519 |
|
|
$ |
17,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstandingbasic |
|
|
348,164,091 |
|
|
|
157,035,119 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
6,404,136 |
|
|
|
6,412,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstandingdiluted |
|
|
354,568,227 |
|
|
|
163,447,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common sharediluted |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share is computed in accordance with EITF 03-6 Participating Securities
and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128, (EITF 03-06). Under EITF 03-6, the
preferred stock is considered a participating security for purposes of computing earnings or loss
per common share and, therefore, the preferred stock is included in the computation of basic and
diluted net income per common share using the two-class method, except during periods of net
losses. Preferred stock was included in the computation of income per common share through
April 24, 2007, the date of conversion to common stock as a result of the Offering. When
determining basic earnings per common share under EITF 03-6, undistributed earnings for a period
are allocated to a participating security based on the contractual participation rights of the
security to share in those earnings as if all of the earnings for the period had been distributed.
For the three months ended March 31, 2008, 8.7 million of stock options were excluded from the
calculation of diluted net income per common share since the effect was anti-dilutive.
For the three months ended March 31, 2007, 142.8 million of convertible shares of Series D
Preferred Stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per common share since the
effect was anti-dilutive.
For the three months ended March 31, 2007, 6.0 million of convertible shares of Series E
Preferred Stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per common share since the
effect was anti-dilutive.
13. Commitments and Contingencies:
AWS Licenses Acquired in Auction 66
Spectrum allocated for AWS currently is utilized by a variety of categories of commercial and
governmental users. To foster the orderly clearing of the spectrum, the FCC adopted a transition
and cost sharing plan pursuant to which incumbent non-governmental users could be reimbursed for
relocating out of the band, and the costs of relocation would be shared by AWS licensees benefiting
from the relocation. The FCC has established a plan where the AWS licensee and the incumbent
non-governmental user are to negotiate voluntarily for three years and then, if no agreement has
been reached, the incumbent licensee is subject to mandatory relocation where the AWS licensee can
force the incumbent non-governmental licensee to relocate at the AWS licensees expense. The
spectrum allocated for AWS currently is utilized also by incumbent governmental users. The FCC
rules provide that a portion of the money raised in Auction 66 will be used to reimburse the
relocation costs of incumbent governmental users from the AWS band. However, not all incumbent
governmental users are obligated to relocate and some such users
11
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
may delay relocation for some time. For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the
Company incurred approximately $0.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively, in microwave relocation
costs relating to its AWS licenses.
FCC Katrina Order
In October 2007, the FCC released an Order on Reconsideration (Reconsideration Order) which
requires the Company to maintain emergency backup power for a minimum of twenty-four hours for
assets that are normally powered from local commercial power and located inside mobile switching
offices, and eight hours for assets that are normally powered from local commercial power at other
locations, including cell sites and DAS nodes. The Company will not be required to comply
immediately with these minimum backup power requirements where the Company can demonstrate that
such compliance is precluded by: (i) federal, state, tribal or local law; (ii) risk to safety of
life or health; or (iii) private legal obligation or agreement. In addition, within six months of
the effective date of the Reconsideration Order, which is the date of the federal register
publication announcing Office of Management and Budget, (OMB), approval of the information
collection requirements, the Company will be required to file a report with the FCC providing
certain information with respect to compliance with the backup power requirements. The District of
Columbia Court of Appeals has stayed the effective date of the Reconsideration Order pending the
appeal of the Reconsideration Order by multiple parties. In cases where the Company identifies
assets that were designed with less than the required emergency backup power capacity and that is
not precluded from compliance, the Company must comply with the backup power requirement or, within
12 months from the effective date of the rule, file with the FCC a certified emergency backup power
compliance plan. That plan must certify that and describe how the Company will provide emergency
backup power to 100 percent of the area covered by any non-compliant asset in the event of a
commercial power failure. If the Company is required to comply with the Reconsideration Order the
Company may be required to purchase additional equipment, spend additional capital, seek and
receive additional state and local permits, authorizations and approvals, and incur additional
operating expenses to comply with the Reconsideration Order and such costs could be material. The
Company could be forced to also discontinue service from some sites or in some areas due to the new
rules.
Patent Litigation
On June 14, 2006, Leap Wireless International, Inc. and Cricket Communications, Inc., or
collectively Leap, filed suit against the Company in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, Civil Action No. 2-06CV-240-TJW and amended on
June 16, 2006, for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,813,497 Method for Providing Wireless
Communication Services and Network and System for Delivering of Same, or the 497 Patent, held by
Leap. The complaint seeks both injunctive relief and monetary damages, including treble damages and
attorneys fees, for the Companys alleged willful infringement by the Companys wireless
communication systems and associated services of the 497 patent. The Company answered the
complaint, raised a number of affirmative defenses and together with two related entities,
counterclaimed against Leap and several related entities and certain current and former employees
of Leap, including Leaps CEO. In its counterclaims, the Company claims that it does not infringe
any valid or enforceable claim of the 497 Patent and the Company asserts claims for breach of
contractual obligations, constructive trust, misappropriation, conversion and misappropriation of
trade secrets, misappropriation of confidential information, and breach of a confidential
relationship. The Companys counterclaims seek monetary and exemplary damages, and injunctive
relief. Certain of the Leap defendants, including its CEO, have answered the Companys
counterclaims, denied the Companys allegations and asserted affirmative defenses to its
counterclaims. In connection with denying a motion to dismiss by certain individual defendants,
the court concluded that the Companys claims against those defendants were compulsory
counterclaims.
On October 31, 2007, pursuant to a joint motion by the parties, the Court entered an order
administratively closing the action. On February 14, 2008, the Court entered an order reopening
the action, and the court has scheduled the claims construction hearing for late June 2008 and
trial for early December 2008. The Company plans to vigorously defend against Leaps claims
relating to the 497 Patent.
The Company has also tendered Leaps claims to the manufacturer of its network infrastructure
equipment, Alcatel Lucent, for indemnity and defense. Alcatel Lucent declined to indemnify and
defend the Company. The Company filed a petition in state district court in Harrison County,
Texas, Cause No. 07-0710, for a declaratory
12
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
ruling that Alcatel Lucent is obligated to cooperate, indemnify, defend and hold the Company
harmless from the Leap patent infringement action and for specific performance, for injunctive
relief and for breach of contract. Alcatel Lucent has responded to the Companys petition and
requested that the Court dismiss, abate, stay, and deny every claim in the Company petition
asserted against Alcatel Lucent and order the Company to amend its petition. The Company has
responded to Alcatel Lucents request. The parties have agreed to postpone the hearing on Alcatel
Lucents request. No hearing is currently scheduled for Alcatel Lucents request. The Company
intends to vigorously prosecute this action.
On September 22, 2006, Royal Street Communications filed a separate action in the United
States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, Civil Action No.
8:06-CV-01754-T-23TBM, seeking a declaratory judgment that Leaps 497 Patent is invalid and not
being infringed upon by Royal Street Communications. Leap responded to Royal Street
Communications complaint by filing a motion to dismiss Royal Street Communications complaint for
lack of jurisdiction or, in the alternative, that the action be transferred to the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, where Leap has brought suit
against the Company under the same patent. Royal Street Communications responded to this motion,
but the Court entered an Order transferring the action to the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, Civil Action No. 2:07-CV-00285-TJW, where it remains
pending. In February 2008, Leap answered the complaint and counterclaimed against Royal Street
Communications, alleging that Royal Street Communications willfully infringes the 497 Patent and
seeking both injunctive relief and monetary damages, including treble damages and attorneys fees,
for Royal Street Communications alleged willful infringement by its wireless communication systems
and associated services of the 497 Patent. Leap has also filed a motion to consolidate this
action with the Leap action against the Company. Royal Street Communications has opposed such
motion to consolidate. Royal Street Communications plans to vigorously defend against Leaps
claims relating to the 497 Patent.
If Leap were successful in its claim for injunctive relief in either action, the Company and
Royal Street Communications could each be enjoined from operating its business in the manner in
which it and Royal Street Communications currently operates, which could require the Company and
Royal Street Communications to expend additional capital to change certain technologies and
operating practices, or could prevent both the Company and Royal Street Communications from
offering some or all of the services the Company and Royal Street Communications each provides
using some or all of the Companys or Royal Street Communications existing systems. In addition,
if Leap were successful in its claim for monetary damages, the Company and Royal Street could be
forced to pay Leap substantial damages, including treble damages if found to have willfully
infringed the 497 Patent, for past infringement and/or ongoing royalties on a portion of its
revenues, which could materially adversely impact the Company and Royal Street Communications
financial performance. Further, if Leap were successful, the Company and/or Royal Street could be
required to pay Leaps attorneys fees.
On January 7, 2008, Freedom Wireless, Inc., or Freedom Wireless, filed suit against Verisign,
Inc., the Companys billing vendor, and several telecommunications providers who use Verisigns
billing system, including the Company, in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of California, San Francisco Division, Civil Action Number CV-08-112-JL, for infringement
of U.S. Patent No. 5,722,067 entitled Security Cellular Telecommunications System, U.S. Patent
No. 6,157,823 entitled Security Cellular Telecommunications System, and U.S. Patent No. 6,236,851
entitled Prepaid Security Cellular Telecommunications System, or collectively the Freedom
Wireless Patents, held by Freedom Wireless. The complaint seeks both injunctive relief and
monetary damages, including treble damages and attorneys fees, for the Companys alleged willful
infringement of the Freedom Wireless Patents. The Company has tendered this action to Verisign and
Verisign has indicated that it is reviewing the Companys indemnification request. Verisign also
has indicated that it plans to leave the telecommunications service business and cease providing
the Company with billing services through the end of its current contract with the Company. The
Company can give no assurance that Verisign will defend the Company against this action or that
Verisign may not cease providing the Company with billing services altogether. The Company plans
to vigorously defend against Freedom Wireless claims related to the Freedom Wireless Patents.
If Freedom Wireless is successful in its claim for injunctive relief, the Company could be
enjoined from operating its business in the manner it operates currently, which could require the
Company to redesign its current billing or other systems, to expend additional capital to change
certain of its technologies and operating practices, or could
13
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
prevent the Company from offering certain of its services. In addition, if Freedom Wireless
is successful in its claim for monetary damage, and Verisign does not, or is unable to, pay such
damages, the Company could be forced to pay substantial damages, including treble damages and
attorneys fees, for past infringement and/or ongoing royalties on a portion of its revenues, which
could materially adversely impact the Companys financial performance. If Freedom Wireless
prevails in its action, it could have a material adverse effect on the Companys business,
financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, the actions may consume valuable
management time, may be very costly to defend and may distract management attention away from the
Companys business.
Litigation
In addition, the Company is involved in other litigation from time to time, including
litigation regarding intellectual property claims that the Company considers to be in the normal
course of business. The company is not currently party to any other pending legal proceedings that
it believes would, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the
Companys financial condition or results of operations or liquidity.
14. Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
17,662 |
|
|
$ |
22,069 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
Non-cash investing activities:
Net changes in the Companys accrued purchases of property, plant and equipment were $11.3
million and $7.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Non-cash financing activities:
The Company accrued dividends of $5.2 million related to the Series D Preferred Stock for the
three months ended March 31, 2007.
The Company accrued dividends of $0.7 million related to the Series E Preferred Stock for the
three months ended March 31, 2007.
15. Related-Party Transactions:
One of the Companys current directors is a general partner of various investment funds
affiliated with one of the Companys greater than 5% stockholders. These funds own in the
aggregate an approximate 20% interest in a company that provides services to the Companys
customers, including handset insurance programs and roadside assistance services. Pursuant to the
Companys agreement with this related party, the Company bills its customers directly for these
services and remits the fees collected from its customers for these services to the related party.
Accruals for the fees that the Company collected from its customers are included in accounts
payable and accrued expenses on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company had the
following transactions with this related party (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Fees received by the Company as
compensation for providing billing and
collection services |
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
Handsets sold to the related party |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
14
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Accruals for fees collected from customers |
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
Receivables from the related party included in accounts receivable: |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
One of the Companys current directors is a general partner of various investment funds
affiliated with one of the Companys greater than 5% stockholders. These funds own an interest in
a company that provides cell site leases to the Company. During the three months ended March 31,
2008 and 2007, the Company recorded rent expense of approximately $0.1 million, and $0.1 million,
respectively, for cell site leases. As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company owed
approximately $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, to this related party for deferred rent
liability related to these cell site leases that is included in deferred rents on the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets.
16. Segment Information:
Operating segments are defined by SFAS No. 131, Disclosure About Segments of an Enterprise
and Related Information, (SFAS No. 131), as components of an enterprise about which separate
financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision
maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Companys chief
operating decision maker is the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer.
As of March 31, 2008, the Company had thirteen operating segments based on geographic region
within the United States: Atlanta, Boston, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Las Vegas, Los Angeles,
Miami, New York, Orlando/Jacksonville, Philadelphia, Sacramento, San Francisco and Tampa/Sarasota.
Each of these operating segments provides wireless voice and data services and products to
customers in its service areas or is currently constructing a network in order to provide these
services. These services include unlimited local and long distance calling, voicemail, caller ID,
call waiting, enhanced directory assistance, text messaging, picture and multimedia messaging,
domestic and international long distance, international text messaging, ringtones, games and
content applications, unlimited directory assistance, ring back tones, nationwide roaming, mobile
Internet browsing, mobile instant messaging, push e-mail and other value-added services.
The Company aggregates its operating segments into two reportable segments: Core Markets and
Expansion Markets.
|
|
|
Core Markets, which include Atlanta, Miami, Sacramento and San Francisco, are
aggregated because they are reviewed on an aggregate basis by the chief operating decision
maker, they are similar in respect to their products and services, production processes,
class of customer, method of distribution, and regulatory environment and currently exhibit
similar financial performance and economic characteristics. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets, which include Boston, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Las Vegas, Los
Angeles, New York, Orlando/Jacksonville, Philadelphia and Tampa/Sarasota, are aggregated
because they are reviewed on an aggregate basis by the chief operating decision maker, they
are similar in respect to their products and services, production processes, class of
customer, method of distribution, and regulatory environment and have similar expected
long-term financial performance and economic characteristics. |
General corporate overhead, which includes expenses such as corporate employee labor costs,
rent and utilities, legal, accounting and auditing expenses, is allocated equally across all
operating segments. Corporate marketing and advertising expenses are allocated equally to the
operating segments, beginning in the period during which the Company launches service in that
operating segment. Expenses associated with the Companys national data center and national
operations center are allocated based on the average number of customers in each operating segment.
There are no transactions between reportable segments.
Interest and certain other expenses, interest income and income taxes are not allocated to the
segments in the computation of segment operating results for internal evaluation purposes.
15
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expansion |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 |
|
Core Markets |
|
Markets |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Service revenues |
|
$ |
369,270 |
|
|
$ |
192,700 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
561,970 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
59,604 |
|
|
|
40,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,384 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
428,874 |
|
|
|
233,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
662,354 |
|
Cost of service (1) |
|
|
107,284 |
|
|
|
81,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,473 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
110,433 |
|
|
|
89,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,158 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (2) |
|
|
43,567 |
|
|
|
60,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,374 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA (3) |
|
|
170,526 |
|
|
|
7,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
31,527 |
|
|
|
20,360 |
|
|
|
5,413 |
|
|
|
57,300 |
|
Loss (gain) on disposal of assets |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
2,937 |
|
|
|
5,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,465 |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
135,872 |
|
|
|
(18,429 |
) |
|
|
(5,415 |
) |
|
|
112,028 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,425 |
|
|
|
47,425 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,888 |
) |
|
|
(9,888 |
) |
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,001 |
|
|
|
8,001 |
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
135,872 |
|
|
|
(18,429 |
) |
|
|
(51,256 |
) |
|
|
66,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expansion |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 |
|
Core Markets |
|
Markets |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Service revenues |
|
$ |
336,934 |
|
|
$ |
102,582 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
439,516 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
68,268 |
|
|
|
28,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,170 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
405,202 |
|
|
|
131,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
536,686 |
|
Cost of service (1) |
|
|
100,440 |
|
|
|
44,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,335 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
113,240 |
|
|
|
60,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173,308 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (2) |
|
|
43,296 |
|
|
|
29,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,937 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA (deficit) (3) |
|
|
150,322 |
|
|
|
(1,005 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
28,105 |
|
|
|
10,063 |
|
|
|
1,212 |
|
|
|
39,380 |
|
Loss (gain) on disposal of assets |
|
|
2,895 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
3,050 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
2,095 |
|
|
|
2,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,211 |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
117,225 |
|
|
|
(13,176 |
) |
|
|
(1,373 |
) |
|
|
102,676 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,976 |
|
|
|
48,976 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,157 |
) |
|
|
(7,157 |
) |
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
117,225 |
|
|
|
(13,176 |
) |
|
|
(43,430 |
) |
|
|
60,619 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Cost of service for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 includes $0.5 million and
$0.2 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation disclosed separately. |
|
(2) |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
2007 includes $8.0 million and $4.0 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation
disclosed separately. |
|
(3) |
|
Core and Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA (deficit) is presented in accordance with SFAS No.
131 as it is the primary financial measure utilized by management to facilitate evaluation of
the Companys ability to meet future debt service, capital expenditures and working capital
requirements and to fund future growth. |
The following table reconciles segment Adjusted EBITDA (deficit) for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 and 2007 to consolidated income before provision for income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Segment Adjusted EBITDA (Deficit): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
170,526 |
|
|
$ |
150,322 |
|
Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA (Deficit) |
|
|
7,288 |
|
|
|
(1,005 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
177,814 |
|
|
|
149,317 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(57,300 |
) |
|
|
(39,380 |
) |
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(3,050 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
(8,465 |
) |
|
|
(4,211 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(47,425 |
) |
|
|
(48,976 |
) |
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
(303 |
) |
|
|
(238 |
) |
Interest and other income |
|
|
9,888 |
|
|
|
7,157 |
|
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
(8,001 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated income before provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
66,187 |
|
|
$ |
60,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
17. Guarantor Subsidiaries:
In connection with Wireless sale of the 91/4% Senior Notes due 2014 and the entry into the
Senior Secured Credit Facility, MetroPCS and all of MetroPCS subsidiaries, other than Wireless and
Royal Street (the guarantor subsidiaries), provided guarantees on the 91/4% Senior Notes and Senior
Secured Credit Facility. These guarantees are full and unconditional as well as joint and several.
Certain provisions of the Senior Secured Credit Facility and the indenture relating to the 91/4%
Senior Notes restrict the ability of Wireless to loan funds to MetroPCS. However, Wireless is
allowed to make certain permitted payments to MetroPCS under the terms of the Senior Secured Credit
Facility and the indenture relating to the 91/4% Senior Notes. Royal Street (the non-guarantor
subsidiaries) is not a guarantor of the 91/4% Senior Notes or the Senior Secured Credit Facility.
The following information presents condensed consolidating balance sheets as of March 31, 2008
and December 31, 2007, condensed consolidating statements of income for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 and 2007, and condensed consolidating statements of cash flows for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 of the parent company (MetroPCS), the issuer (Wireless), the
guarantor subsidiaries and the non-guarantor subsidiaries (Royal Street). Investments in
subsidiaries held by the parent company and the issuer have been presented using the equity method
of accounting.
17
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Balance Sheet
As of March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
810,779 |
|
|
$ |
471,313 |
|
|
$ |
476 |
|
|
$ |
28,161 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,310,729 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,157 |
|
|
|
8,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,475 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,827 |
|
Prepaid charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,466 |
|
|
|
41,146 |
|
|
|
4,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,336 |
|
Deferred charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,331 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,920 |
|
Current receivable from
subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,805 |
|
|
|
(187,507 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
1,124 |
|
|
|
2,443 |
|
|
|
17,921 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
811,903 |
|
|
|
794,120 |
|
|
|
67,861 |
|
|
|
37,898 |
|
|
|
(187,507 |
) |
|
|
1,524,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,935 |
|
|
|
1,661,836 |
|
|
|
334,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,038,194 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
28,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,049 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
498,228 |
|
|
|
1,465,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,964,123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
FCC licenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,779,296 |
|
|
|
293,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,072,895 |
|
Microwave relocation costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,517 |
|
Long-term receivable from
subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
665,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(665,524 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,290 |
|
|
|
171,641 |
|
|
|
13,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,338,180 |
|
|
$ |
3,008,764 |
|
|
$ |
3,691,151 |
|
|
$ |
679,650 |
|
|
$ |
(2,817,154 |
) |
|
$ |
5,900,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and
accrued expenses |
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
$ |
194,732 |
|
|
$ |
207,738 |
|
|
$ |
35,799 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
438,353 |
|
Current maturities of
long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
Current debt to parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,805 |
|
|
|
182,702 |
|
|
|
(187,507 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,877 |
|
|
|
106,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,829 |
|
Advances to subsidiaries |
|
|
(545,422 |
) |
|
|
(1,087,685 |
) |
|
|
1,633,088 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
4,527 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
(545,338 |
) |
|
|
(851,021 |
) |
|
|
1,957,110 |
|
|
|
218,798 |
|
|
|
(187,507 |
) |
|
|
592,042 |
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,981,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,981,572 |
|
Long-term debt to parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
665,524 |
|
|
|
(665,524 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
306,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306,949 |
|
Deferred rents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,038 |
|
|
|
3,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,776 |
|
Redeemable minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,335 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,701 |
|
|
|
17,242 |
|
|
|
4,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
(545,338 |
) |
|
|
2,510,536 |
|
|
|
2,012,390 |
|
|
|
892,516 |
|
|
|
(853,031 |
) |
|
|
4,017,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES (See Note 13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,533,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
|
|
1,533,931 |
|
Retained earnings (deficit) |
|
|
377,930 |
|
|
|
526,616 |
|
|
|
1,678,761 |
|
|
|
(232,866 |
) |
|
|
(1,972,511 |
) |
|
|
377,930 |
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(28,378 |
) |
|
|
(28,388 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,388 |
|
|
|
(28,378 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,883,518 |
|
|
|
498,228 |
|
|
|
1,678,761 |
|
|
|
(212,866 |
) |
|
|
(1,964,123 |
) |
|
|
1,883,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,338,180 |
|
|
$ |
3,008,764 |
|
|
$ |
3,691,151 |
|
|
$ |
679,650 |
|
|
$ |
(2,817,154 |
) |
|
$ |
5,900,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Balance Sheet
As of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
801,472 |
|
|
$ |
633,277 |
|
|
$ |
444 |
|
|
$ |
35,015 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,470,208 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,904 |
|
|
|
7,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,139 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,809 |
|
Prepaid charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,485 |
|
|
|
46,105 |
|
|
|
3,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,469 |
|
Deferred charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,635 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,920 |
|
Current receivable from
subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(154,758 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
2,369 |
|
|
|
3,024 |
|
|
|
16,129 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
803,841 |
|
|
|
974,793 |
|
|
|
69,913 |
|
|
|
39,095 |
|
|
|
(154,758 |
) |
|
|
1,732,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,636 |
|
|
|
1,546,647 |
|
|
|
300,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,891,411 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
36,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,050 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
471,392 |
|
|
|
1,362,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,834,102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
FCC licenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,779,296 |
|
|
|
293,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,072,895 |
|
Microwave relocation costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,105 |
|
Long-term receivable from
subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
618,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(618,191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,524 |
|
|
|
6,442 |
|
|
|
13,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,311,283 |
|
|
$ |
3,042,854 |
|
|
$ |
3,412,403 |
|
|
$ |
646,641 |
|
|
$ |
(2,607,051 |
) |
|
$ |
5,806,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and
accrued expenses |
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
154,205 |
|
|
$ |
244,913 |
|
|
$ |
40,254 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
439,449 |
|
Current maturities of
long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,758 |
|
|
|
(154,758 |
) |
|
|
16,000 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,369 |
|
|
|
96,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,481 |
|
Advances to subsidiaries |
|
|
(537,540 |
) |
|
|
(949,296 |
) |
|
|
1,486,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
4,211 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
(537,463 |
) |
|
|
(754,598 |
) |
|
|
1,832,072 |
|
|
|
195,237 |
|
|
|
(154,758 |
) |
|
|
580,490 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,986,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,986,177 |
|
Long-term note to parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
618,191 |
|
|
|
(618,191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
290,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290,128 |
|
Deferred rents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,939 |
|
|
|
2,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,779 |
|
Redeemable minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,032 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,723 |
|
|
|
11,637 |
|
|
|
3,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
(537,463 |
) |
|
|
2,571,462 |
|
|
|
1,876,648 |
|
|
|
819,686 |
|
|
|
(772,949 |
) |
|
|
3,957,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES (See Note 13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,524,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
|
|
1,524,769 |
|
Retained earnings (deficit) |
|
|
338,411 |
|
|
|
485,871 |
|
|
|
1,535,755 |
|
|
|
(193,045 |
) |
|
|
(1,828,581 |
) |
|
|
338,411 |
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive loss |
|
|
(14,469 |
) |
|
|
(14,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,479 |
|
|
|
(14,469 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,848,746 |
|
|
|
471,392 |
|
|
|
1,535,755 |
|
|
|
(173,045 |
) |
|
|
(1,834,102 |
) |
|
|
1,848,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,311,283 |
|
|
$ |
3,042,854 |
|
|
$ |
3,412,403 |
|
|
$ |
646,641 |
|
|
$ |
2,607,051 |
|
|
$ |
5,806,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Income
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
563,196 |
|
|
$ |
12,849 |
|
|
$ |
(14,075 |
) |
|
$ |
561,970 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,007 |
|
|
|
97,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,007 |
|
|
|
660,573 |
|
|
|
12,849 |
|
|
|
(14,075 |
) |
|
|
662,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding
depreciation and amortization
expense shown separately
below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,854 |
|
|
|
19,694 |
|
|
|
(14,075 |
) |
|
|
188,473 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,861 |
|
|
|
197,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,158 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
(excluding depreciation and
amortization expense shown
separately below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
99,265 |
|
|
|
4,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,374 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
49,575 |
|
|
|
7,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,300 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,062 |
|
|
|
529,009 |
|
|
|
32,330 |
|
|
|
(14,075 |
) |
|
|
550,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
131,564 |
|
|
|
(19,481 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,011 |
|
|
|
(11,408 |
) |
|
|
20,642 |
|
|
|
(22,820 |
) |
|
|
47,425 |
|
Earnings from consolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
(40,744 |
) |
|
|
(103,185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of put option in
majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
(6,776 |
) |
|
|
(25,596 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(302 |
) |
|
|
22,820 |
|
|
|
(9,888 |
) |
Impairment loss on investment
securities |
|
|
8,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (income) expense |
|
|
(39,519 |
) |
|
|
(67,467 |
) |
|
|
(11,442 |
) |
|
|
20,340 |
|
|
|
143,929 |
|
|
|
45,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision
for income taxes |
|
|
39,519 |
|
|
|
67,412 |
|
|
|
143,006 |
|
|
|
(39,821 |
) |
|
|
(143,929 |
) |
|
|
66,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,668 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,668 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
39,519 |
|
|
$ |
40,744 |
|
|
$ |
143,006 |
|
|
$ |
(39,821 |
) |
|
$ |
(143,929 |
) |
|
$ |
39,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Income
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
577 |
|
|
$ |
439,488 |
|
|
$ |
4,225 |
|
|
$ |
(4,774 |
) |
|
$ |
439,516 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,080 |
|
|
|
94,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,657 |
|
|
|
533,578 |
|
|
|
4,225 |
|
|
|
(4,774 |
) |
|
|
536,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding
depreciation and amortization
expense shown separately below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,411 |
|
|
|
9,698 |
|
|
|
(4,774 |
) |
|
|
145,335 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2984 |
|
|
|
170,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173,308 |
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses (excluding depreciation and
amortization expense shown separately
below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
68,331 |
|
|
|
4,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,937 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,708 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,380 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,049 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,050 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,081 |
|
|
|
420,823 |
|
|
|
14,880 |
|
|
|
(4,774 |
) |
|
|
434,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
112,755 |
|
|
|
(10,655 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,312 |
|
|
|
(1,522 |
) |
|
|
9,730 |
|
|
|
(13,544 |
) |
|
|
48,976 |
|
Earnings from consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(35,481 |
) |
|
|
(94,505 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of put option in
majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
(871 |
) |
|
|
(19,216 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(604 |
) |
|
|
13,544 |
|
|
|
(7,157 |
) |
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (income) expense |
|
|
(36,352 |
) |
|
|
(59,171 |
) |
|
|
(1,532 |
) |
|
|
9,126 |
|
|
|
129,986 |
|
|
|
42,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for
income taxes |
|
|
36,352 |
|
|
|
59,747 |
|
|
|
114,287 |
|
|
|
(19,781 |
) |
|
|
(129,986 |
) |
|
|
60,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
36,352 |
|
|
$ |
35,480 |
|
|
$ |
114,287 |
|
|
$ |
(19,781 |
) |
|
$ |
(129,986 |
) |
|
$ |
36,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
39,519 |
|
|
$ |
40,744 |
|
|
$ |
143,006 |
|
|
$ |
(39,821 |
) |
|
$ |
(143,929 |
) |
|
$ |
39,519 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
49,575 |
|
|
|
7,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,300 |
|
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
Deferred rent expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,099 |
|
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,997 |
|
Cost of abandoned cell sites |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,668 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,465 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
17,843 |
|
|
|
(17,843 |
) |
|
|
600 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
515 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned
subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303 |
|
Impairment loss in investment securities |
|
|
8,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,001 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,548 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities |
|
|
(38,910 |
) |
|
|
(114,436 |
) |
|
|
(85,231 |
) |
|
|
(5,172 |
) |
|
|
203,217 |
|
|
|
(40,532 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities |
|
|
8,610 |
|
|
|
(47,115 |
) |
|
|
121,830 |
|
|
|
(17,321 |
) |
|
|
41,445 |
|
|
|
107,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,535 |
) |
|
|
(141,479 |
) |
|
|
(34,422 |
) |
|
|
(2,178 |
) |
|
|
(183,614 |
) |
Change in prepaid purchases of property and
equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,856 |
|
|
|
20,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,172 |
|
Cash used in acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,600 |
) |
Deposit to FCC for licenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(153,682 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(153,682 |
) |
Microwave relocation costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(635 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(635 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(170,961 |
) |
|
|
(121,798 |
) |
|
|
(34,422 |
) |
|
|
(2,178 |
) |
|
|
(329,359 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in book overdraft |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,734 |
|
Proceeds from long-term note to parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
(80,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,551 |
) |
|
|
2,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,182 |
) |
|
|
38,182 |
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities |
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
56,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,889 |
|
|
|
(39,267 |
) |
|
|
62,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
9,307 |
|
|
|
(161,964 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
(6,854 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(159,479 |
) |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
|
|
801,472 |
|
|
|
633,277 |
|
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
35,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,470,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
|
$ |
810,779 |
|
|
$ |
471,313 |
|
|
$ |
476 |
|
|
$ |
28,161 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,310,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
36,352 |
|
|
$ |
35,480 |
|
|
$ |
114,287 |
|
|
$ |
(19,781 |
) |
|
$ |
(129,986 |
) |
|
$ |
36,352 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,708 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,380 |
|
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
Deferred rent expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,758 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,039 |
|
Cost of abandoned cell sites |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
1,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,796 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,211 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,826 |
|
|
|
(13,826 |
) |
|
|
1,096 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,049 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,050 |
|
Gain on sale of investments |
|
|
(326 |
) |
|
|
(633 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(959 |
) |
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned
subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,611 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities |
|
|
(33,751 |
) |
|
|
(133,187 |
) |
|
|
(37,592 |
) |
|
|
(6,379 |
) |
|
|
211,258 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
2,275 |
|
|
|
(73,268 |
) |
|
|
125,007 |
|
|
|
(9,888 |
) |
|
|
67,446 |
|
|
|
111,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,418 |
) |
|
|
(119,025 |
) |
|
|
(26,792 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(156,235 |
) |
Change in prepaid purchases of property and
equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,321 |
|
|
|
(5,975 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,654 |
) |
Purchase of investments |
|
|
(54,727 |
) |
|
|
(266,595 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(321,322 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of investments |
|
|
67,553 |
|
|
|
336,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404,551 |
|
Change in restricted cash and investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
12,826 |
|
|
|
64,862 |
|
|
|
(125,000 |
) |
|
|
(26,792 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74,104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in book overdraft |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,281 |
|
Proceeds from long-term note to parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
(70,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(740 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(740 |
) |
Cost of raising capital |
|
|
(1,288 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,288 |
) |
Payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,367 |
) |
|
|
2,367 |
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(1,189 |
) |
|
|
33,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,446 |
|
|
|
(67,446 |
) |
|
|
32,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(13,912 |
) |
|
|
25,135 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
30,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,820 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
|
|
15,714 |
|
|
|
99,301 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
46,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
|
$ |
29,626 |
|
|
$ |
124,436 |
|
|
$ |
264 |
|
|
$ |
76,992 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
231,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
18. Recent Accounting Pronouncements:
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations, (SFAS No.
141(R)), which establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures
in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. SFAS No. 141(R) also
establishes disclosure requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of
the business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2008 and early adoption is prohibited. The Company has not yet
determined the effect on its financial condition or results of operations, if any, upon adoption of
SFAS No. 141(R).
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements, (SFAS No. 160), which establishes accounting and reporting standards for
ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of
consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a
parents ownership interest, and the valuation of retained noncontrolling equity investments when a
subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS No. 160 also establishes disclosure requirements that clearly
identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the
noncontrolling owners. SFAS No. 160 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008 and early adoption is prohibited. The Company has not yet
determined the effect on its financial condition or results of operations, if any, upon adoption of
SFAS No. 160.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161
requires enhanced disclosures about a companys derivative and hedging activities. These enhanced
disclosures will discuss (a) how and why a company uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative
instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FASB Statement No. 133 and its related
interpretations and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect a companys
financial position, results of operations and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal
years beginning on or after November 15, 2008, with earlier adoption allowed. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS No. 161.
19. Subsequent Events:
On April 30, 2008, Wireless entered into a two-year interest rate protection agreement to
manage the Companys interest rate risk exposure. The agreement is effective on June 30, 2008,
covers a notional amount of $500 million and effectively coverts this portion of Wireless variable
rate debt to fixed rate debt at an annual rate of 5.46%. The monthly interest settlement periods
begin on June 30, 2008. The interest rate protection agreement expires on June 30, 2010.
24
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
Any statements made in this report that are not statements of historical fact, including
statements about our beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements within the meaning
of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and should be evaluated as
such. Forward-looking statements include information concerning any possible or assumed future
results of operations, including statements that may relate to our plans, objectives, strategies,
goals, future events, future revenues or performance, future penetration rates, planned market
launches, capital expenditures, financing needs and other information that is not historical
information. Forward-looking statements often include words such as anticipate, expect,
suggests, plan, believe, intend, estimates, targets, projects, would, should,
could, may, will, continue, forecast, and other similar expressions. These
forward-looking statements are contained throughout this report, including Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Legal Proceedings, and Risks
Factors.
We base the forward-looking statements or projections made in this report on our current
expectations, plans and assumptions that we have made in light of our experience in the industry,
as well as our perceptions of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments
and other factors we believe are appropriate under the circumstances and at such times. As you
read and consider this report, you should understand that these forward-looking statements or
projections are not guarantees of future performance or results. Although we believe that these
forward-looking statements and projections are based on reasonable assumptions at the time they are
made, you should be aware that many factors could affect our actual financial results, performance
or results of operations and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed
in the forward-looking statements and projections. Factors that may materially affect such
forward-looking statements and projections include:
|
|
|
the highly competitive nature of our industry; |
|
|
|
|
the rapid technological changes in our industry; |
|
|
|
|
an economic slowdown or recession in the United States; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to maintain adequate customer care and manage our churn rate; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to sustain the growth rates we have experienced to date; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to construct and launch future markets within projected time frames; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to manage our rapid growth, train additional personnel and improve our
financial and disclosure controls and procedures; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to secure the necessary spectrum and network infrastructure equipment; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to clear the Auction 66 spectrum of incumbent licensees; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to adequately enforce or protect our intellectual property rights or defend
against suits filed by others; |
|
|
|
|
governmental regulation of our services and the costs of compliance and our failure to
comply with such regulations; |
|
|
|
|
our capital structure, including our indebtedness amounts; |
|
|
|
|
changes in consumer preferences or demand for our products; |
|
|
|
|
our inability to attract and retain key members of management; and |
|
|
|
|
other factors described under Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended
December 31, 2007 as updated or supplemented in Item 1A. Risk Factors. |
25
These forward-looking statements and projections speak only as to the date made and are
subject to and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions, many of which are beyond our control
or ability to predict and you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements
and projections. All future written and oral forward-looking statements and projections
attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by our
cautionary statements. We do not intend to, and do not undertake a duty to, update any
forward-looking statement or projection in the future to reflect the occurrence of events or
circumstances, except as required by law.
Company Overview
Except as expressly stated, the financial condition and results of operations discussed
throughout Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
are those of MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, including MetroPCS
Wireless, Inc. and Royal Street Communications, LLC. References to MetroPCS, MetroPCS
Communications, our Company, the Company, we, our, ours and us refer to MetroPCS
Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Unless otherwise
indicated, all share numbers and per share prices give effect to a 3 for 1 stock split effected by
means of a stock dividend of two shares of common stock for each share of common stock issued and
outstanding at the close of business on March 14, 2007. On April 18, 2007, the registration
statement for our initial public offering became effective and our common stock began trading on
the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol PCS on April 19, 2007. We consummated our initial
public offering of our common stock on April 24, 2007.
We are a wireless telecommunications carrier that currently offers wireless broadband personal
communication services, or PCS, primarily in the greater Atlanta, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Las
Vegas, Los Angeles, Miami, Orlando/Jacksonville, San Francisco, Sacramento and Tampa/Sarasota
metropolitan areas. We launched service in the greater Atlanta, Miami and Sacramento metropolitan
areas in the first quarter of 2002; in San Francisco in September 2002; in Tampa/Sarasota in
October 2005; in Dallas/Ft. Worth in March 2006; in Detroit in April 2006; in Orlando in November
2006; in Los Angeles in September 2007; and in Las Vegas in March 2008. In 2005, Royal Street
Communications, LLC, or Royal Street Communications, and with its wholly-owned subsidiaries, or
collectively, Royal Street, was granted licenses by the Federal Communications Commission, or FCC,
in Los Angeles and various metropolitan areas throughout northern Florida. We own 85% of the
limited liability company member interests in Royal Street, but may only elect two of the five
members of Royal Street Communications management committee. We have a wholesale arrangement with
Royal Street under which we purchase up to 85% of the engineered capacity of Royal Streets systems
allowing us to sell our standard products and services under the MetroPCS brand to the public.
Royal Street has constructed, or is in the process of constructing, its network infrastructure in
its licensed metropolitan areas. We commenced commercial services in Orlando and certain portions
of northern Florida in November 2006 and in Los Angeles in September 2007 through our arrangements
with Royal Street. Additionally, upon Royal Streets request, we have provided and will provide
financing to Royal Street under a loan agreement. As of March 31, 2008, the maximum amount that
Royal Street could borrow from us under the loan agreement was approximately $680 million of which
Royal Street had borrowed $670 million through March 31, 2008. On April 2, 2008, we executed an
amendment to the loan agreement which increased the amount available to Royal Street under the loan
agreement by an additional $255.0 million.
As a result of the significant growth we have experienced since we launched operations, our
results of operations to date are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected in
future periods. Moreover, we expect that our number of customers will continue to increase, which
will continue to contribute to increases in our revenues and operating expenses. In November 2006,
we were granted advanced wireless services, or AWS, licenses in Auction 66, currently covering a
total population of approximately 126 million for an aggregate purchase price of approximately
$1.4 billion. Approximately 84 million of the total licensed population associated with our
Auction 66 licenses represent expansion opportunities in geographic areas outside of our then
current operating markets, which we refer to as our Auction 66 Markets. These new expansion
opportunities in our Auction 66 Markets cover six of the 25 largest metropolitan areas in the
United States. The balance of our Auction 66 Markets, which currently cover a population of
approximately 42 million, supplements or expands the geographic boundaries of our and Royal
Streets then existing operations in Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Los Angeles, San Francisco and
Sacramento. We currently plan to focus on building out approximately 40 million of the total
population in our Auction 66 Markets with a primary focus on the New York, Philadelphia, Boston and
Las Vegas metropolitan areas.
26
Of the approximate
40 million total population, we are targeting launch of operations with an initial covered
population of approximately 30 to 32 million by late 2008 through the first half of 2009. Our
initial launch dates will vary in our Auction 66 Markets and our launch dates in the larger
metropolitan areas will be accomplished in phases. We launched service in the Las Vegas metropolitan area in March 2008.
Our Auction 66 Markets will entail a more
extensive use of distributed antenna systems, or DAS, than we have deployed in the past. This,
along with other factors, will result in an increase in total capital expenditures per covered
population to initially launch operations, however, we would not expect the estimate of total cash
expenditures to reach free cash flow positive to be materially impacted. We believe that our
existing cash, cash equivalents and our anticipated cash flows from operations will be sufficient
to fully fund this planned expansion.
On January 24, 2008, the FCC commenced an auction 700 MHz spectrum, or Auction 73. On January
15, 2008, MetroPCS 700 MHz, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, submitted an upfront
payment to the FCC in the amount of $153.7 million to qualify to participate in Auction 73.
Auction 73 concluded on March 18, 2008 and the FCC announced that the Company was the high bidder,
with a winning bid of approximately $313.3 million, on a 10 MHz license covering a total population
of approximately 8.3 million for the Boston economic area, which is encompassed within the
geographic boundaries of our existing AWS license for the Boston metropolitan area. On April 2,
2008, we filed our post-auction application with the FCC to secure a final grant of the 700 MHz
license and, on April 16, 2008, we paid the FCC the remaining $159.6 million for the 700 MHz
license. On April 22, 2008, the FCC released a public notice accepting our application for filing.
We sell products and services to customers through our Company-owned retail stores as well as
indirectly through relationships with independent retailers. We offer service which allows our
customers to place unlimited local calls from within our local service area and to receive
unlimited calls from any area while in our local service area, under simple and affordable flat
monthly rate service plans starting at $30 per month. For an additional $5 to $20 per month, our
customers may select a service plan that offers additional services, such as unlimited voicemail,
caller ID, call waiting, enhanced directory assistance, unlimited text messaging, mobile Internet
browsing, push e-mail, mobile instant messaging, picture and multimedia messaging and the ability
to place unlimited long distance calls from within our local service calling area to any number in
the continental United States. We offer flat-rate monthly plans at $30, $35, $40, $45 and $50, as
well as Family plans which offer discounts off our monthly plans for multiple lines. All of these
plans require payment in advance for one month of service. If no payment is made in advance for the
following month of service, service is discontinued at the end of the month that was paid for by
the customer. For additional fees, we also provide international long distance and international
text messaging, ringtones, ring back tones, downloads, games and content applications, unlimited
directory assistance and other value-added services. As of March 31, 2008, over 90% of our
customers have selected a $40 or higher rate plan. Our flat-rate plans differentiate our service
from the more complex plans and long-term contract requirements of traditional wireless carriers.
In addition, the above products and services are offered by us in the Royal Street markets under
the MetroPCS brand.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of certain assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. We have
discussed those estimates that we believe are critical and require the use of complex judgment in
their application in Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of OperationsCritical Accounting Policies and Estimates of our Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, on February 29,
2008.
Other than the adoption of SFAS No. 157, our critical accounting policies and the
methodologies and assumptions we apply under them have not materially changed from our Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Revenues
We derive our revenues from the following sources:
27
Service. We sell wireless broadband PCS services. The various types of service revenues
associated with wireless broadband PCS for our customers include monthly recurring charges for
airtime, monthly recurring charges for optional features (including nationwide long distance,
unlimited text messaging, international text messaging, voicemail, downloads, ringtones, games and
content applications, unlimited directory assistance, enhanced directory assistance, ring back
tones, mobile Internet browsing, mobile instant messaging, push e-mail and nationwide roaming) and
charges for domestic and international long distance service. Service revenues also include
intercarrier compensation and nonrecurring activation service charges to customers.
Equipment. We sell wireless broadband PCS handsets and accessories that are used by our
customers in connection with our wireless services. This equipment is also sold to our independent
retailers to facilitate distribution to our customers.
Costs and Expenses
Our costs and expenses include:
Cost of Service. The major components of our cost of service are:
|
|
|
Cell Site Costs. We incur expenses for the rent of cell sites, network
facilities, engineering operations, field technicians and related utility and
maintenance charges. |
|
|
|
|
Intercarrier Compensation. We pay charges to other telecommunications companies
for their transport and termination of calls originated by our customers and destined
for customers of other networks. These variable charges are based on our customers
usage and generally applied at pre-negotiated rates with other carriers, although some
carriers have sought to impose such charges unilaterally. |
|
|
|
|
Variable Long Distance. We pay charges to other telecommunications companies for
long distance service provided to our customers. These variable charges are based on
our customers usage, applied at pre-negotiated rates with the long distance carriers. |
Cost of Equipment. We purchase wireless broadband PCS handsets and accessories from
third-party vendors to resell to our customers and independent retailers in connection with our
services. We subsidize the sale of handsets to encourage the sale and use of our services. We do
not manufacture any of this equipment.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Our selling expense includes advertising and
promotional costs associated with marketing and selling to new customers and fixed charges such as
retail store rent and retail associates salaries. General and administrative expense includes
support functions including, technical operations, finance, accounting, human resources,
information technology and legal services. We record stock-based compensation expense in cost of
service and in selling, general and administrative expenses for expense associated with employee
stock options, which is measured at the date of grant, based on the estimated fair value of the
award.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation is applied using the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the assets once the assets are placed in service, which are seven to ten
years for network infrastructure assets and capitalized interest, three to seven years for office
equipment, which includes computer equipment, three to seven years for furniture and fixtures and
five years for vehicles. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the term of the respective
leases, which includes renewal periods that are reasonably assured, or the estimated useful life of
the improvement, whichever is shorter.
Interest Expense and Interest Income. Interest expense includes interest incurred on our
borrowings, amortization of debt issuance costs and amortization of discounts and premiums on
long-term debt. Interest income is earned primarily on our cash and cash equivalents.
Income Taxes. As a result of our operating losses and accelerated depreciation available under
federal tax laws, we paid no federal income taxes during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
2007. For the three months ended March 31, 2008, we paid approximately $0.5 million in state
income taxes. We paid no significant state income taxes during the three months ended March 31,
2007.
28
Seasonality
Our customer activity is influenced by seasonal effects related to traditional retail selling
periods and other factors that arise from our target customer base. Based on historical results,
we generally expect net customer additions to be strongest in the first and fourth quarters.
Softening of sales and increased customer turnover, or churn, in the second and third quarters of
the year usually combine to result in fewer net customer additions. However, sales activity and
churn can be strongly affected by the launch of new markets and promotional activity, which have
the ability to reduce or outweigh certain seasonal effects.
Operating Segments
Operating segments are defined by SFAS No. 131 Disclosure About Segments of an Enterprise and
Related Information, (SFAS No. 131), as components of an enterprise about which separate
financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision
maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Our chief operating
decision maker is the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer.
As of March 31, 2008, we had thirteen operating segments based on geographic region within the
United States: Atlanta, Boston, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Miami, New York,
Orlando/Jacksonville, Philadelphia, Sacramento, San Francisco, and Tampa/Sarasota. Each of these
operating segments provide wireless voice and data services and products to customers in its
service areas or is currently constructing a network in order to provide these services. These
services include unlimited local and long distance calling, voicemail, caller ID, call waiting,
enhanced directory assistance, text messaging, picture and multimedia messaging, domestic and
international long distance, international text messaging, ringtones, games and content
applications, unlimited directory assistance, ring back tones, nationwide roaming, mobile Internet
browsing, mobile instant messaging, push e-mail and other value-added services.
We aggregate our operating segments into two reportable segments: Core Markets and Expansion
Markets.
|
|
|
Core Markets, which include Atlanta, Miami, Sacramento and San Francisco, are
aggregated because they are reviewed on an aggregate basis by the chief operating decision
maker, they are similar in respect to their products and services, production processes,
class of customer, method of distribution, and regulatory environment and currently exhibit
similar financial performance and economic characteristics. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets, which include Boston, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Las Vegas, Los
Angeles, New York, Orlando/Jacksonville, Philadelphia, and Tampa/Sarasota are aggregated
because they are reviewed on an aggregate basis by the chief operating decision maker, they
are similar in respect to their products and services, production processes, class of
customer, method of distribution, and regulatory environment and have similar expected
long-term financial performance and economic characteristics. |
General corporate overhead, which includes expenses such as corporate employee labor costs,
rent and utilities, legal, accounting and auditing expenses, is allocated equally across all
operating segments. Corporate marketing and advertising expenses are allocated equally to the
operating segments, beginning in the period during which we launch service in that operating
segment. Expenses associated with our national data center are allocated based on the average
number of customers in each operating segment. All intercompany transactions between reportable
segments have been eliminated in the presentation of operating segment data.
Interest and certain other expenses, interest income and income taxes are not allocated to the
segments in the computation of segment operating profit for internal evaluation purposes.
29
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2007
Set forth below is a summary of certain financial information by reportable operating segment
for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
Reportable Operating Segment Data |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
369,270 |
|
|
$ |
336,934 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
192,700 |
|
|
|
102,582 |
|
|
|
88 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
561,970 |
|
|
$ |
439,516 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
59,604 |
|
|
$ |
68,268 |
|
|
|
(13 |
)% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
40,780 |
|
|
|
28,902 |
|
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
100,384 |
|
|
$ |
97,170 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding
depreciation and amortization
disclosed separately below)(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
107,284 |
|
|
$ |
100,440 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
81,189 |
|
|
|
44,895 |
|
|
|
81 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
188,473 |
|
|
$ |
145,335 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
110,433 |
|
|
$ |
113,240 |
|
|
|
(2 |
)% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
89,725 |
|
|
|
60,068 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
200,158 |
|
|
$ |
173,308 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
(excluding depreciation and
amortization disclosed
separately below)(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
43,567 |
|
|
$ |
43,296 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
60,807 |
|
|
|
29,641 |
|
|
|
105 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
104,374 |
|
|
$ |
72,937 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA (Deficit)(2): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
170,526 |
|
|
$ |
150,322 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
7,288 |
|
|
|
(1,005 |
) |
|
|
** |
|
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
31,527 |
|
|
$ |
28,105 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
20,360 |
|
|
|
10,063 |
|
|
|
102 |
% |
Other |
|
|
5,413 |
|
|
|
1,212 |
|
|
|
347 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
57,300 |
|
|
$ |
39,380 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
2,937 |
|
|
$ |
2,095 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
5,528 |
|
|
|
2,116 |
|
|
|
161 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,465 |
|
|
$ |
4,211 |
|
|
|
101 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
135,872 |
|
|
$ |
117,225 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
(18,429 |
) |
|
|
(13,176 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
)% |
Other |
|
|
(5,415 |
) |
|
|
(1,373 |
) |
|
|
(294 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
112,028 |
|
|
$ |
102,676 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
** |
|
Not meaningful. |
|
(1) |
|
Cost of service and selling, general and administrative expenses include stock-based
compensation expense. For the three months ended March 31, 2008, cost of service includes $0.5
million and selling, general and administrative expenses includes $8.0 million of stock-based
compensation expense. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, cost of service includes
$0.2 million and selling, general and administrative expenses includes $4.0 million of
stock-based compensation expense. |
|
(2) |
|
Core and Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA (Deficit) is presented in accordance with SFAS No.
131 as it is the primary financial measure utilized by management to facilitate evaluation of
our ability to meet future debt service, capital expenditures and working capital requirements
and to fund future growth. |
30
Service Revenues. Service revenues increased $122.5 million, or 28%, to $562.0 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 from $439.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
The increase is due to increases in Core Markets and Expansion Markets service revenues as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets service revenues increased $32.4 million, or 10%, to $369.3
million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 from $336.9 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2007. The increase in service revenues is primarily attributable to net
additions of approximately 311,000 customers for the twelve months ended March 31, 2008,
which accounted for $44.4 million of the Core Markets increase, partially offset by the
higher participation in our Family Plans and reduced revenue from certain features now
included in our service plans that were previously provided a la carte, accounting for a
$9.9 million decrease. In addition, consolidated E-911, Federal Universal Service Fund, or
FUSF, vendors compensation and activation revenues increased $7.4 million during the three
months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This increase is
primarily attributable to a 30% increase in our consolidated customer base since March 31,
2007 and higher FUSF rates. Beginning on January 1, 2008, a portion of these revenues were
allocated to the Expansion Markets in the amount of $9.5 million resulting in a net
decrease of $2.1 million in the Core Markets for the three months ended March 31, 2008
compared to the same period in 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets service revenues increased $90.1 million, or 88%,
to $192.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 from $102.6 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2007. The increase in service revenues is primarily
attributable to net additions of approximately 708,000 customers for the twelve months
ended March 31, 2008, which accounted for $90.0 million of the Expansion Markets increase,
partially offset by the higher participation in our Family Plans and reduced revenue from
certain features now included in our service plans that were previously provided a la
carte, accounting for a $9.4 million decrease. In addition, E-911, FUSF, vendors
compensation and activation revenues increased approximately $9.5 million during the three
months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 due primarily to the
allocation of a portion of these revenues to the Expansion Markets beginning on January 1,
2008. |
Equipment Revenues. Equipment revenues increased $3.2 million, or 3%, to $100.4 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2008 from $97.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
The increase is due primarily to an increase in Expansion Markets equipment revenues, partially
offset by a decrease in Core Markets equipment revenues as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets equipment revenues decreased $8.7 million, or 13%, to $59.6
million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 from $68.3 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2007. The decrease in equipment revenues is primarily attributable to the
sale of lower priced handset models which accounted for $10.3 million of the decrease,
partially offset by an increase in upgrade handset sales to existing customers which
accounted for a $1.6 million increase in equipment revenues. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets equipment revenues increased $11.9 million, or
41%, to $40.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 from $28.9 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2007. The increase in equipment revenues is primarily
attributable to an increase in gross additions of approximately 133,500 customers for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007, which accounted
for $7.7 million of the Expansion Markets increase, an increase in upgrade handset sales to
existing customers which accounted for $8.9 million of the increase and an increase of
approximately $0.9 million in additional accessory sales. This increase in equipment
revenues was partially offset by the sale of lower priced handset models which accounted
for a $5.6 million decrease. |
Cost of Service. Cost of service increased $43.2 million, or 30%, to $188.5 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 from $145.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
The increase is due to increases in Core Markets and Expansion Markets cost of service as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets cost of service increased $6.9 million, or 7%, to $107.3
million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 from $100.4 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2007. Core Markets cost of service (excluding E-911, FUSF and NECA/TRS
expenses) increased $7.9 million, or 10%, |
31
|
|
|
to $88.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 from $80.2 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2007. The increase was primarily attributable to the 13% growth in
our Core Markets customer base and the deployment of additional network infrastructure during
the twelve months ended March 31, 2008. In addition, consolidated E-911, FUSF, and NECA/TRS
expenses increased $8.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the
same period in 2007. This increase is primarily attributable to a 30% increase in our
consolidated customer base since March 31, 2007 and higher FUSF rates. Beginning on January
1, 2008, a portion of these expenses were allocated to the Expansion Markets in the amount of
$9.3 million resulting in a net decrease of $1.1 million in the Core Markets for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. |
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets cost of service increased $36.3 million, or 81%,
to $81.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 from $44.9 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2007. Expansion Markets cost of service (excluding E-911, FUSF and
NECA/TRS expenses) increased $27.0 million, or 61%, to $71.2 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 from $44.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007. The
increase was attributable to the launch of service in the Los Angeles metropolitan area in
September 2007 and the Las Vegas metropolitan area in March 2008, coupled with build-out
expenses related to the New York, Philadelphia and Boston metropolitan areas and
substantial net additions in the remaining Expansion Markets. The Expansion Markets
contributed net additions of approximately 708,000 customers during the twelve months ended
March 31, 2008. In addition, E-911, FUSF and NECA/TRS expenses increased approximately
$9.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the same period in
2007 due primarily to the allocation of a portion of these expenses to the Expansion
Markets beginning on January 1, 2008. |
Cost of Equipment. Cost of equipment increased $26.8 million, or 15%, to $200.1 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2008 from $173.3 million for the three months ended March 31,
2007. The increase is due primarily to an increase in Expansion Markets cost of equipment,
partially offset by a decrease in Core Markets cost of equipment as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets cost of equipment decreased $2.8 million, or 2%, to $110.4
million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 from $113.2 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2007. The decrease in cost of equipment is primarily attributable to the
sale of lower priced handsets which accounted for $5.8 million, partially offset by an
increase in the cost of equipment as a result of increased sales of handsets to existing
customers when compared to the same period in 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets cost of equipment increased $29.6 million, or 49%,
to $89.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 from $60.1 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2007. The increase in Expansion Markets equipment cost is
attributable to an increase in gross customer additions during the three months ended of
approximately 133,500 customers as compared to the same period in 2007, which accounted for
$18.1 million of the increase. In addition, cost of equipment sales to existing customers
increased $13.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. These increases were
partially offset by the sale of lower priced handsets which accounted for a $2.1 million
decrease. |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $31.5 million, or 43%, to $104.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 from
$72.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007. The increase is due primarily to an
increase in Expansion Markets selling, general and administrative expenses, partially offset by a
decrease in Core Markets selling, general and administrative as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets selling, general and administrative expenses increased $0.3
million, or 1%, to $43.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 from $43.3
million for the three months ended March 31, 2007. Selling expenses increased by $3.7
million, or approximately 15% for the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the
three months ended March 31, 2007. The increase in selling expenses is primarily due to a
$2.1 million increase in marketing and advertising expenses incurred to support the growth
in the Core Markets and a $1.1 million increase related to FUSF billings that were
allocated to selling expenses beginning January 1, 2008. General and administrative
expenses decreased $3.4 million, or approximately 13% for the three months ended March 31,
2008 compared to the same period in |
32
|
|
|
2007 due primarily to a decrease in various administrative expenses incurred as a result of
cost benefits achieved due to the increasing scale of our business in the Core Markets. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $31.2 million, or 105%, to $60.8 million for the three months ended March 31,
2008 from $29.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007. Selling expenses
increased by $12.3 million, or approximately 96% for the three months ended March 31, 2008
compared to the three months ended March 31, 2007. This increase is primarily due to a
$6.8 million increase in marketing and advertising expenses incurred to support the growth
in the Expansion Markets as well as higher employee costs of $3.3 million. General and
administrative expenses increased by $18.3 million, or approximately 108% for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 primarily due to growth in
the Expansion Markets, including the launch of service in the Los Angeles and Las Vegas
metropolitan areas and build-out expenses related to the New York, Philadelphia and Boston
metropolitan areas. |
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $17.9 million,
or 46%, to $57.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 from $39.4 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2007. The increase is primarily due to increases in Core Markets and
Expansion Markets depreciation expense as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets depreciation and amortization expense increased $3.4
million, or 12%, to $31.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 from $28.1
million for the three months ended March 31, 2007. The increase related primarily to an
increase in network infrastructure assets placed into service during the twelve months
ended March 31, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets depreciation and amortization expense increased
$10.3 million, or 102%, to $20.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 from
$10.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007. The increase related primarily to
an increase in network infrastructure assets placed into service during the twelve months
ended March 31, 2008 driven primarily by the launch of service in the Los Angeles
metropolitan area. |
Stock-Based Compensation Expense. Stock-based compensation expense increased $4.3 million, or
101%, to $8.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 from $4.2 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2007. The increase is due primarily to increases in Core Markets and
Expansion Markets stock-based compensation expense as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets stock-based compensation expense increased $0.8 million, or
40%, to $2.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 from $2.1 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2007. The increase is primarily related to an increase in
stock options granted to employees in these markets throughout the twelve months ended
March 31, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets stock-based compensation expense increased $3.5
million, or 161%, to $5.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 from $2.1
million for the three months ended March 31, 2007. The increase is primarily related to an
increase in stock options granted to employees in these markets throughout the twelve
months ended March 31, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
Consolidated Data |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
3,050 |
|
|
|
(99 |
)% |
Interest expense |
|
|
47,425 |
|
|
|
48,976 |
|
|
|
(3 |
)% |
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
8,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
26,668 |
|
|
|
24,267 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Loss on disposal of assets. Loss on disposal of assets decreased $3.1 million, or 99% for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 from $3.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, we recorded a loss on disposal of assets related to
our cell sites in certain markets for certain
network technology that was retired and replaced with new technology.
33
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $1.6 million, or 3%, to $47.4 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 from $49.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
The decrease in interest expense was primarily due to the capitalization of $15.3 million of
interest during the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to $5.6 million of interest
capitalized during the same period in 2007. We capitalize interest costs associated with our FCC
licenses and property and equipment during the construction of a new market. The amount of such
capitalized interest depends on the carrying values of the FCC licenses and construction in
progress involved in those markets and the duration of the construction process. We expect
capitalized interest to be significant during the construction of the Auction 66 Markets. In
addition, our weighted average interest rate decreased to 8.03% for the three months ended March
31, 2008 compared to 8.24% for the three months ended March 31, 2007 as a result of the borrowing
rates under the senior secured credit facility. Average debt outstanding for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 was $3.0 billion compared to the average debt outstanding for the three months
ending March 31, 2007 of $2.6 billion.
Impairment Loss on Investment Securities. We can and have historically invested our
substantial cash balances in, among other things, securities issued and fully guaranteed by the
United States or the states, highly rated commercial paper and auction rate securities, money
market funds meeting certain criteria, and demand deposits. These investments are subject to
credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risk. We made investments of $133.9 million in certain
AAA/Aaa rated auction rate securities some of which are secured by collateralized debt obligations
with a portion of the underlying collateral being mortgage securities or related to mortgage
securities. With the liquidity issues experienced in global credit and capital markets, the
auction rate securities held by us at March 31, 2008 have experienced continued failed auctions as
the amount of securities submitted for sale in the auctions has exceeded the amount of purchase
orders. We recognized an additional other-than-temporary impairment loss on investment securities
in the amount of $8.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2008. See Liquidity and
Capital Resources.
Provision for Income Taxes. Income tax expense was $26.7 million and $24.3 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The effective tax rate was 40.29% and
40.03% for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Our effective rates
differ from the statutory federal rate of 35% for certain items, state and local taxes,
non-deductible expenses and an increase in the valuation allowance.
Performance Measures
In managing our business and assessing our financial performance, we supplement the
information provided by financial statement measures with several customer-focused performance
metrics that are widely used in the wireless industry. These metrics include average revenue per
user per month, or ARPU, which measures service revenue per customer; cost per gross customer
addition, or CPGA, which measures the average cost of acquiring a new customer; cost per user per
month, or CPU, which measures the non-selling cash cost of operating our business on a per customer
basis; and churn, which measures turnover in our customer base. For a reconciliation of Non-GAAP
performance measures and a further discussion of the measures, please read Reconciliation of
Non-GAAP Financial Measures below.
The following table shows consolidated metric information for the three months ended March 31,
2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
|
4,414,519 |
|
|
|
3,395,203 |
|
Net additions |
|
|
451,733 |
|
|
|
454,217 |
|
Churn: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average monthly rate |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
ARPU |
|
$ |
42.22 |
|
|
$ |
43.75 |
|
CPGA |
|
$ |
121.23 |
|
|
$ |
108.80 |
|
CPU |
|
$ |
18.86 |
|
|
$ |
18.56 |
|
34
Customers. Net customer additions were 451,733 for the three months ended March 31, 2008,
compared to 454,217 for the three months ended March 31, 2007, a decrease of 0.5%. Total customers
were 4,414,519 as of March 31, 2008, an increase of 30.0% over the customer total as of March 31,
2007 and 11.4% over the customer total as of December 31, 2007. The increase in total customers is
primarily attributable to the continued demand for our service offerings and the launch of our
services in the Los Angeles metropolitan area in September 2007.
Churn. As we do not require a long-term service contract, we expect our churn percentage to be
higher than traditional wireless carriers that require customers to sign a one- to two-year
contract with significant early termination fees. Average monthly churn represents (a) the number
of customers who have been disconnected from our service during the measurement period less the
number of customers who have reactivated service, divided by (b) the sum of the average monthly
number of customers during such period. We classify delinquent customers as churn after they have
been delinquent for 30 days. In addition, when an existing customer establishes a new account in
connection with the purchase of an upgraded or replacement phone and does not identify themselves
as an existing customer, we count that phone leaving service as a churn and the new phone entering
service as a gross customer addition. Churn for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 was
4.0%. Our customer activity is influenced by seasonal effects related to traditional retail
selling periods and other factors that arise from our target customer base. Based on historical
results, we generally expect net customer additions to be strongest in the first and fourth
quarters. Softening of sales and increased churn in the second and third quarters of the year
usually combine to result in fewer net customer additions during these quarters.
Average Revenue Per User. ARPU represents (a) service revenues less activation revenues,
E-911, FUSF and vendors compensation charges for the measurement period, divided by (b) the sum of
the average monthly number of customers during such period. ARPU was $42.22 and $43.75 for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, a decrease of $1.53. The decrease in ARPU
for the three months ended March 31, 2008, was primarily attributable to higher participation in
our Family Plans as well as reduced revenue from certain features now included in our service plans
that were previously provided a la carte.
Cost Per Gross Addition. CPGA is determined by dividing (a) selling expenses plus the total
cost of equipment associated with transactions with new customers less activation revenues and
equipment revenues associated with transactions with new customers during the measurement period by
(b) gross customer additions during such period. Retail customer service expenses and equipment
margin on handsets sold to existing customers when they are identified, including handset upgrade
transactions, are excluded, as these costs are incurred specifically for existing customers. CPGA
costs have increased to $121.23 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 from $108.80 for the
three months ended March 31, 2008, which was primarily driven by selling expenses associated with
the continued customer growth in our Expansion Markets including the launch of service in the Los
Angeles metropolitan area.
Cost Per User. CPU is cost of service and general and administrative costs (excluding
applicable non-cash stock-based compensation expense included in cost of service and general and
administrative expense) plus net loss on handset equipment transactions unrelated to initial
customer acquisition (which includes the gain or loss on sale of handsets to existing customers and
costs associated with handset replacements and repairs (other than warranty costs which are the
responsibility of the handset manufacturers)), divided by the sum of the average monthly number of
customers during such period. CPU for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 was $18.86
and $18.56, respectively. We continue to achieve cost benefits due to the increasing scale of our
business. However, the benefits have been offset by a combination of construction and launch
expenses associated with our Expansion Markets, which contributed approximately $3.65 and $2.83 of
additional CPU for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
35
Core Markets Performance Measures
Set forth below is a summary of certain key performance measures for the periods indicated for
our Core Markets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
Core Markets Customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
|
2,795,916 |
|
|
|
2,484,811 |
|
Net additions |
|
|
137,011 |
|
|
|
183,853 |
|
Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
170,526 |
|
|
$ |
150,322 |
|
Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA as a
Percent of Service Revenues |
|
|
46.2 |
% |
|
|
44.6 |
% |
We launched our service in the greater Miami, Atlanta, Sacramento and San Francisco
metropolitan areas in 2002. Our Core Markets have a licensed population of approximately 27
million, of which our networks currently cover approximately 24 million.
Customers. Net customer additions in our Core Markets were 137,011 for the three months ended
March 31, 2008, compared to 183,853 for the three months ended March 31, 2007. Total customers
were 2,795,916 as of March 31, 2008, an increase of 12.5% over the customer total as of March 31,
2007 and 5.2% over the customer total as of December 31, 2007. The increase in total customers is
primarily attributable to the continued demand for our service offerings.
Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is presented in accordance with SFAS No. 131 as it is the
primary performance metric for which our reportable segments are evaluated and it is utilized by
management to facilitate evaluation of our ability to meet future debt service, capital
expenditures and working capital requirements and to fund future growth. For the three months
ended March 31, 2008, Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA was $170.5 million compared to $150.3 million
for the same period in 2007. We continue to experience increases in Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA
as a result of continued customer growth and cost benefits due to the increasing scale of our
business in the Core Markets.
Adjusted EBITDA as a Percent of Service Revenues. Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of service
revenues is calculated by dividing Adjusted EBITDA by total service revenues. Core Markets Adjusted
EBITDA as a percent of service revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 were
46.2% and 45.0%, respectively. Consistent with the increase in Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA, we
continue to experience corresponding increases in Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of
service revenues due to the growth in service revenues as well as cost benefits due to the
increasing scale of our business in the Core Markets.
Expansion Markets Performance Measures
Set forth below is a summary of certain key performance measures for the periods indicated for
our Expansion Markets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
Expansion Markets Customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
|
1,618,603 |
|
|
|
910,392 |
|
Net additions |
|
|
314,722 |
|
|
|
270,364 |
|
Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA (Deficit) |
|
$ |
7,288 |
|
|
$ |
(1,005 |
) |
Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA as a
Percent of Service Revenues |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
nm |
36
Customers. Net customer additions in our Expansion Markets were 314,722 for the three months
ended March 31, 2008, compared to 270,364 for the three months ended March 31, 2007. The increase
in net customer additions is primarily attributable to the continued demand for our service
offerings as well as the continued expansion of our service footprint in the Los Angeles
metropolitan area. We have historically experienced greater net additions in the first twelve
months following the launch of services. Total customers were 1,618,603 as of March 31, 2008, an
increase of 77.8% over the customer total as of March 31, 2007 and an increase of 24.1% over the
customer total as of December 31, 2007. The increase in total customers is primarily attributable
to the continued demand for our service offerings and the continued growth of our service footprint
in the Los Angeles metropolitan area since our launch in September 2007.
Adjusted EBITDA (Deficit). Adjusted EBITDA is presented in accordance with SFAS No. 131 as it
is the primary performance metric for which our reportable segments are evaluated and it is
utilized by management to facilitate evaluation of our ability to meet future debt service, capital
expenditures and working capital requirements and to fund future growth. For the three months ended
March 31, 2008, Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA was $7.3 million compared to an Adjusted EBITDA
deficit of $1.0 million for the same period in 2007. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA, when compared
to the same period in the previous year, was attributable to cost benefits achieved due to the
increasing scale of our business, offset by construction and launch expenses associated primarily
with our markets launched in the prior six months and the buildout of our Auction 66 Markets in the
Northeast.
Adjusted EBITDA as a Percent of Service Revenues. Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of service
revenues is calculated by dividing Adjusted EBITDA by total service revenues. Expansion Markets
Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of service revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was
3.8%. Consistent with the increase in Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA, we continue to experience
corresponding increases in Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of service revenues due
to the growth in service revenues as well as cost benefits due to the increasing scale of our
business in the Expansion Markets.
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We utilize certain financial measures and key performance indicators that are not calculated
in accordance with GAAP to assess our financial and operating performance. A non-GAAP financial
measure is defined as a numerical measure of a companys financial performance that (i) excludes
amounts, or is subject to adjustments that have the effect of excluding amounts, that are included
in the comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP in the statement of
income or statement of cash flows; or (ii) includes amounts, or is subject to adjustments that have
the effect of including amounts, that are excluded from the comparable measure so calculated and
presented.
ARPU, CPGA, and CPU are non-GAAP financial measures utilized by our management to judge our
ability to meet our liquidity requirements and to evaluate our operating performance. We believe
these measures are important in understanding the performance of our operations from period to
period, and although every company in the wireless industry does not define each of these measures
in precisely the same way, we believe that these measures (which are common in the wireless
industry) facilitate key liquidity and operating performance comparisons with other companies in
the wireless industry. The following tables reconcile our non-GAAP financial measures with our
financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP.
ARPU We utilize ARPU to evaluate our per-customer service revenue realization and to assist
in forecasting our future service revenues. ARPU is calculated exclusive of activation revenues,
as these amounts are a component of our costs of acquiring new customers and are included in our
calculation of CPGA. ARPU is also calculated exclusive of E-911, FUSF and vendors compensation
revenues, as these are generally pass through charges that we collect from our customers and remit
to the appropriate government agencies.
Average number of customers for any measurement period is determined by dividing (a) the sum
of the average monthly number of customers for the measurement period by (b) the number of months
in such period. Average monthly number of customers for any month represents the sum of the number
of customers on the first day of the month and the last day of the month divided by two. The
following table shows the calculation of ARPU for the periods indicated.
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except average |
|
|
|
number of customers and |
|
|
|
ARPU) |
|
Calculation of Average Revenue Per User (ARPU): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues |
|
$ |
561,970 |
|
|
$ |
439,516 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activation revenues |
|
|
(3,626 |
) |
|
|
(2,459 |
) |
E-911, FUSF
and vendors compensation revenues |
|
|
(26,554 |
) |
|
|
(20,271 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net service revenues |
|
$ |
531,790 |
|
|
$ |
416,786 |
|
Divided by: Average number of customers |
|
|
4,198,794 |
|
|
|
3,175,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARPU |
|
$ |
42.22 |
|
|
$ |
43.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPGA We utilize CPGA to assess the efficiency of our distribution strategy, validate the
initial capital invested in our customers and determine the number of months to recover our
customer acquisition costs. This measure also allows us to compare our average acquisition costs
per new customer to those of other wireless broadband PCS providers. Activation revenues and
equipment revenues related to new customers are deducted from selling expenses in this calculation
as they represent amounts paid by customers at the time their service is activated that reduce our
acquisition cost of those customers. Additionally, equipment costs associated with existing
customers, net of related revenues, are excluded as this measure is intended to reflect only the
acquisition costs related to new customers. The following table reconciles total costs used in the
calculation of CPGA to selling expenses, which we consider to be the most directly comparable GAAP
financial measure to CPGA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except gross |
|
|
|
customer additions and |
|
|
|
CPGA) |
|
Calculation of Cost Per Gross Addition (CPGA): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling expenses |
|
$ |
46,647 |
|
|
$ |
30,106 |
|
Less: Activation revenues |
|
|
(3,626 |
) |
|
|
(2,459 |
) |
Less: Equipment revenues |
|
|
(100,384 |
) |
|
|
(97,170 |
) |
Add: Equipment revenue not associated with new
customers |
|
|
45,803 |
|
|
|
42,009 |
|
Add: Cost of equipment |
|
|
200,158 |
|
|
|
173,308 |
|
Less: Equipment costs not associated with new customers |
|
|
(72,212 |
) |
|
|
(55,169 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross addition expenses |
|
$ |
116,386 |
|
|
$ |
90,625 |
|
Divided by: Gross customer additions |
|
|
960,083 |
|
|
|
832,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPGA |
|
$ |
121.23 |
|
|
$ |
108.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPU CPU is cost of service and general and administrative costs (excluding applicable
non-cash stock-based compensation expense included in cost of service and general and
administrative expense) plus net loss on equipment transactions unrelated to initial customer
acquisition (which includes the gain or loss on sale of handsets to existing customers and costs
associated with handset replacements and repairs (other than warranty costs which are the
responsibility of the handset manufacturers)) exclusive of E-911,
FUSF, NECA/TRS and vendors compensation
charges, divided by the sum of the average monthly number of customers during such period. CPU
does not include any depreciation and amortization expense. Management uses CPU as a tool to
evaluate the non-selling cash expenses associated with ongoing business operations on a per
customer basis, to track changes in these non-selling cash costs over time, and to help evaluate
how changes in our business operations affect non-selling cash costs per customer. In addition,
CPU provides management with a useful measure to compare our non-selling cash costs per customer
with those of other wireless providers. We believe investors use CPU primarily as a tool to track
changes in our non-selling cash costs over time and to compare our non-selling cash costs to those
of other wireless providers, although other wireless carriers may calculate this measure
differently. The following table reconciles total costs used in the calculation of CPU to cost of
service, which we consider to be the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to CPU.
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except average |
|
|
|
number of customers and CPU) |
|
Calculation of Cost Per User (CPU): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service |
|
$ |
188,473 |
|
|
$ |
145,335 |
|
Add: General and administrative expense |
|
|
57,727 |
|
|
|
42,831 |
|
Add: Net loss on equipment
transactions unrelated to initial
customer acquisition |
|
|
26,409 |
|
|
|
13,160 |
|
Less: Stock-based compensation expense
included in cost of service and
general and administrative expense |
|
|
(8,465 |
) |
|
|
(4,211 |
) |
Less: E-911, FUSF and vendors
compensation charges |
|
|
(26,554 |
) |
|
|
(20,271 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs used in the calculation of CPU |
|
$ |
237,590 |
|
|
$ |
176,844 |
|
Divided by: Average number of customers |
|
|
4,198,794 |
|
|
|
3,175,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPU |
|
$ |
18.86 |
|
|
$ |
18.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of liquidity are our existing cash and cash equivalents and cash
generated from operations. At March 31, 2008, we had a total of approximately $1.3 billion in cash
and cash equivalents. We have historically invested our substantial cash balances in, among other
things, securities issued and fully guaranteed by the United States or the states, highly rated
commercial paper and auction rate securities, money market funds meeting certain criteria, and
demand deposits. These investments are subject to credit, liquidity, market and interest rate
risk. At March 31, 2008, we had invested substantially all of our cash and cash equivalents in
money market funds consisting of U.S. treasury securities.
We hold investments of $133.9 million in certain auction rate securities some of which are
secured by collateralized debt obligations with a portion of the underlying collateral being
mortgage securities or related to mortgage securities. Consistent with our investment policy
guidelines, the auction rate securities investments held by us all had AAA/Aaa credit ratings at
the time of purchase. With the liquidity issues experienced in global credit and capital markets,
the auction rate securities held by us at March 31, 2008 have experienced continued failed auctions
as the amount of securities submitted for sale in the auctions has exceeded the amount of purchase
orders. In addition, three auction rate securities held by us have been placed on credit watch and
three auction rate securities have been downgraded from AAA/Aaa. As
of May 9, 2008, the remaining auction rate securities
held by us still retain a AAA/Aaa rating as reported by Standard and Poors and Moodys Investors
Service.
The estimated market value of our auction rate security holdings at March 31, 2008 was
approximately $28.0 million, which reflects a $105.9 million adjustment to the principal value of
$133.9 million. The estimated market value at December 31, 2007 was approximately $36.1 million,
which reflected a $97.8 million adjustment to the principal value at that date. Although the
auction rate securities continue to pay interest according to their stated terms, based on
statements received from our broker and an analysis of other-than-temporary impairment factors, we
have recorded an impairment charge of $8.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2008,
reflecting an additional portion of auction rate security holdings that we have concluded have an
other-than-temporary decline in value.
Historically, given the liquidity created by auctions, our auction rate securities were
presented as current assets under short-term investments on our balance sheet. Given the failed
auctions, our auction rate securities are illiquid until there is a successful auction for them.
Accordingly, the entire amount of such remaining auction rate securities has been reclassified from
current to non-current assets and is presented in long-term investments on our balance sheet as of
March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. The $105.9 million impairment charges recorded to date does
not have a material impact on our liquidity and is not included in our approximately $1.3 billion
in cash and cash equivalents as of March 31, 2008. If uncertainties in the credit and capital
markets continue or these markets deteriorate further, we may incur additional impairments to its
auction rate securities. Management believes that any future additional impairment charges will
not have a material effect on our liquidity.
39
Our strategy has been to offer our services in major metropolitan areas and their surrounding
areas, which we refer to as clusters. We are seeking opportunities to enhance our current market
clusters and to provide service in new geographic areas. From time to time, we may purchase
spectrum and related assets from third parties or the FCC. We participated as a bidder in FCC
Auction 66 and in November 2006 we were granted eight licenses for a total aggregate purchase price
of approximately $1.4 billion. On January 24, 2008, the FCC commenced Auction 73. On January 15,
2008, MetroPCS 700 MHz, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, submitted an upfront payment
to the FCC in the amount of $153.7 million to qualify to participate in Auction 73. Auction 73
concluded on March 18, 2008 and the FCC announced that the
Company was the high bidder, with a winning bid of approximately
$313.3 million, on a 10 MHz
license covering a total population of approximately 8.3 million for the Boston economic area,
which is encompassed within the geographic boundaries of our existing AWS license for the Boston
metropolitan area. On April 2, 2008, we filed
our post-auction application with the FCC to secure a final grant of
the 700 MHz license and on
April 16, 2008, we paid the FCC the remaining
$159.6 million for the 700 MHz license. On April
22, 2008, the FCC released a public notice accepting our application for filing.
As a result of the acquisition of the spectrum licenses from Auction 66 and the opportunities
that these licenses provide for us to expand our operations into major metropolitan markets, we
will require significant additional capital in the future to finance the construction and initial
operating costs associated with such licenses. We generally do not intend to commence the
construction of any individual license area until we have sufficient funds available to provide for
the related construction and operating costs associated with such license area. We currently plan
to focus on building out approximately 40 million of the total population in our Auction 66 Markets
with a primary focus on the New York, Philadelphia, Boston and Las Vegas metropolitan areas. We
launched service in the Las Vegas metropolitan area in March 2008. Of the approximate 40 million
total population, we are targeting launch of operations with an initial covered population of
approximately 30 to 32 million by late 2008 through the first half of 2009. Our initial launch
dates will vary in our Auction 66 Markets and our launch dates in the larger metropolitan areas
will be accomplished in phases. Our Auction 66 Markets will entail a more extensive use of DAS
systems than we have deployed in the past. This, along with other factors, could result in an
increase in the total capital expenditures per covered population to initially launch operations,
however, we would not expect the estimate of total cash expenditures to reach free cash flow
positive to be materially impacted. We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments and our anticipated cash flows from operations will be sufficient to fully
fund this planned expansion.
The construction of our network and the marketing and distribution of our wireless
communications products and services have required, and will continue to require, substantial
capital investment. Capital outlays have included license acquisition costs, capital expenditures
for construction of our network infrastructure, costs associated with clearing and relocating
non-governmental incumbent licenses, funding of operating cash flow losses incurred as we launch
services in new metropolitan areas and other working capital costs, debt service and financing fees
and expenses. Our capital expenditures for the first three months of 2008 were approximately
$183.6 million and aggregate capital expenditures for 2007 were approximately $767.7 million.
These expenditures were primarily associated with the construction of the network infrastructure in
our Expansion Markets and our efforts to increase the service area and capacity of our existing
Core Markets network through the addition of cell sites and switches. We believe the increased
service area and capacity in existing markets will improve our service offering, helping us to
attract additional customers and increase revenues. In addition, we believe our new Expansion
Markets have attractive demographics which will result in increased revenues.
As of March 31, 2008, we owed an aggregate of approximately $3.0 billion under our senior
secured credit facility and 91/4% senior notes.
Our senior secured credit facility calculates consolidated Adjusted EBITDA as: consolidated
net income plus depreciation and amortization; gain (loss) on disposal of assets; non-cash
expenses; gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt; provision for income taxes; interest expense; and
certain expenses of MetroPCS Communications, Inc. minus interest and other income and non-cash
items increasing consolidated net income.
We consider Adjusted EBITDA, as defined above, to be an important indicator to investors
because it provides information related to our ability to provide cash flows to meet future debt
service, capital expenditures and working capital requirements and fund future growth. We present
this discussion of Adjusted EBITDA because covenants in our senior secured credit facility contain
ratios based on this measure. If our Adjusted EBITDA were to decline below certain levels,
covenants in our senior secured credit facility that are based on Adjusted EBITDA, including our
maximum senior secured leverage ratio covenant, may be violated and could cause, among other
things, an inability to incur further indebtedness and in certain circumstances a default or
mandatory prepayment under our senior secured credit facility. Our maximum senior secured leverage
ratio is required to be less than 4.5 to 1.0 based on Adjusted
40
EBITDA plus the impact of certain new markets. The lenders under our senior secured credit
facility use the senior secured leverage ratio to measure our ability to meet our obligations on
our senior secured debt by comparing the total amount of such debt to our Adjusted EBITDA, which
our lenders use to estimate our cash flow from operations. The senior secured leverage ratio is
calculated as the ratio of senior secured indebtedness to Adjusted EBITDA, as defined by our senior
secured credit facility. For the twelve months ended March 31, 2008, our senior secured leverage
ratio was 2.05 to 1.0, which means for every $1.00 of Adjusted EBITDA we had $2.05 of senior
secured indebtedness. In addition, consolidated Adjusted EBITDA is also utilized, among other
measures, to determine managements compensation levels. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure
calculated in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered a substitute for, operating
income, net income, or any other measure of financial performance reported in accordance with GAAP.
In addition, Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an alternative to, or more meaningful than
cash flows from operating activities, as determined in accordance with GAAP.
The following table shows the calculation of our consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, as defined in
our senior secured credit facility, for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Calculation of Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
39,519 |
|
|
$ |
36,352 |
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
57,300 |
|
|
|
39,380 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
3,050 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense (1) |
|
|
8,465 |
|
|
|
4,211 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
47,425 |
|
|
|
48,976 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary (1) |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
(9,888 |
) |
|
|
(7,157 |
) |
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
8,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
26,668 |
|
|
|
24,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
177,814 |
|
|
$ |
149,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents a non-cash expense, as defined by our senior secured credit facility. |
In addition, for further information, the following table reconciles consolidated Adjusted
EBITDA, as defined in our senior secured credit facility, to cash flows from operating activities
for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Reconciliation of Net Cash Provided by Operating
Activities to Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
107,449 |
|
|
$ |
111,572 |
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
47,425 |
|
|
|
48,976 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
(1,096 |
) |
Interest and other income |
|
|
(9,888 |
) |
|
|
(7,157 |
) |
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
Deferred rent expense |
|
|
(5,997 |
) |
|
|
(2,039 |
) |
Cost of abandoned cell sites |
|
|
(1,668 |
) |
|
|
(1,796 |
) |
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
|
(515 |
) |
|
|
(282 |
) |
Gain on sale of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
959 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
26,668 |
|
|
|
24,267 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(25,548 |
) |
|
|
(23,611 |
) |
Changes in working capital |
|
|
40,532 |
|
|
|
(349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
177,814 |
|
|
$ |
149,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities was $107.4 million during the three months ended March
31, 2008 compared to $111.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2007. The decrease was
primarily attributable to an $85.8 million decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses that
was partially offset by a $57.6 million reduction in inventory during the three months ended March
31, 2008 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities was $329.4 million during the three months ended March 31,
2008 compared to $74.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2007. The increase was due
primarily to a $153.7 million deposit to the FCC for participation in Auction 73 and a $27.4
million increase in purchases of property and equipment which was primarily related to construction
in the Expansion Markets, and a $83.2 million decrease in net proceeds from the sale of
investments.
Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities was $62.4 million during the three months ended March
31, 2008 compared to $32.4 million during the three months ended March 31, 2007. This increase was
due primarily to a $27.5 million increase in book overdraft liability as a result of the timing of
accounts payable disbursements.
Capital Expenditures and Other Asset Acquisitions and Dispositions
Capital Expenditures. We and Royal Street currently expect to incur capital expenditures in
the range of $1.1 billion to $1.3 billion for the year ending December 31, 2008 in our Core and
Expansion Markets, which includes $600 million to $700 million in our Auction 66 Markets. In
addition, we will spend $313.3 million for the purchase of spectrum in Auction 73 for the year
ended December 31, 2008.
During the three months ended March 31, 2008, we and Royal Street incurred $183.6 million in
capital expenditures. These capital expenditures were primarily for the expansion and improvement
of our existing network infrastructure and costs associated with the construction of the Boston,
Las Vegas, Los Angeles, New York and Philadelphia Expansion Markets.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, we and Royal Street incurred $767.7 million in
capital expenditures. These capital expenditures were primarily for the expansion and improvement
of our existing network infrastructure and costs associated with the construction of the Los
Angeles metropolitan area, which was launched in September 2007.
Other Acquisitions and Dispositions. On December 21, 2007, the Company executed an agreement
with PTA Communications, Inc. (PTA) to purchase 10 MHz of PCS spectrum from PTA for the basic
trading area of Jacksonville, Florida. The Company also entered into agreements with NTCH, Inc.
(dba Cleartalk PCS) and PTA-FLA, Inc. for the purchase of certain of their assets used in providing
PCS wireless telecommunications services in the Jacksonville market. Consummation of both
acquisitions is conditioned on customary closing conditions and the license purchase agreement also
requires approval by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). On January 17, 2008, the
Company closed on the acquisition of certain assets used in providing PCS wireless services. The
Company paid a total of $18.6 million in cash for these assets, exclusive of transaction costs. On
February 27, 2008, the FCC issued a public notice announcing the approval of the acquisition of the
10 MHz of spectrum. The Company plans to consummate the acquisition of the 10 MHz license in the
second quarter of 2008.
42
On January 24, 2008, the FCC commenced Auction 73. On January
15, 2008, MetroPCS 700 MHz, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, submitted an upfront
payment to the FCC in the amount of $153.7 million to qualify to participate in Auction 73.
Auction 73 concluded on March 18, 2008 and the FCC announced that the Company was the high bidder,
with a winning bid of approximately $313.3 million, on a 10 MHz license covering a total population
of approximately 8.3 million for the Boston economic area, which is encompassed within the
geographic boundaries of our existing AWS license for the Boston metropolitan area. On April 2,
2008, we filed our post-auction application with the FCC to secure a final grant of the 700 MHz
license and, on April 16, 2008, we paid the FCC the remaining $159.6 million for the 700 MHz
license. On April 22, 2008, the FCC released a public notice accepting our application for filing.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Inflation
We believe that inflation has not materially affected our operations.
Effect of New Accounting Standards
We believe that the adoption of new accounting standards has not materially affected our
results of operations. For further discussion see Note 18 to the financial statements included in
this report.
Fair Value Measurements
We do not expect changes in the aggregate fair value of our financial assets and liabilities
to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements. See Note 9 to the financial
statements included in this report.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market prices and rates,
including interest rates. We do not routinely enter into derivatives or other financial
instruments for trading, speculative or hedging purposes, unless it is required by our senior
secured credit facility. We do not currently conduct business internationally, so we are generally
not subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk.
As of March 31, 2008, we had approximately $1.6 billion in outstanding indebtedness under our
senior secured credit facility that bears interest at floating rates based on the London Inter Bank
Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus 2.25%. The interest rate on the outstanding debt under our senior
secured credit facility as of March 31, 2008 was 6.468%. On November 21, 2006, to manage our
interest rate risk exposure and fulfill a requirement of our senior secured credit facility, we
entered into a three-year interest rate protection agreement. This agreement covers a notional
amount of $1.0 billion and effectively converts this portion of our variable rate debt to
fixed-rate debt at an annual rate of 7.169%. The quarterly interest settlement periods began on
February 1, 2007. The interest rate swap agreement expires in 2010. If market LIBOR rates
increase 100 basis points over the rates in effect at March 31, 2008, annual interest expense on
the approximately $576.0 million in variable rate debt would increase approximately $5.8 million.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported as required by the SEC and that such information is accumulated and communicated to
management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow for appropriate and timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management, with participation by our CEO and CFO,
has designed the Companys disclosure controls and procedures to provide reasonable assurance of
achieving these desired objectives. As required by SEC Rule 13a-15(b), we conducted an
43
evaluation, with the participation of our CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2008, the end of the period
covered by this report. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, our
management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated,
can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management
is necessarily required to apply judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible
controls and objectives. Based upon that evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of March 31, 2008 in timely making known to
them material information relating to us and our consolidated subsidiaries required to be disclosed
in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the first quarter of 2008 and effective as of April 1, 2008, the Company completed its
accounting system conversion from Solomon Accounting Software to Oracle Enterprise Business Suite
(Oracle ERP). Management is redesigning and evaluating our internal controls over financial
reporting for the new Oracle ERP environment to ensure that our controls and procedures continue to
be effective. There have been no other changes in the Companys internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2008 that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial
reporting.
44
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On June 14, 2006, Leap Wireless International, Inc. and Cricket Communications, Inc., or
collectively Leap, filed suit against us in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Texas, Marshall Division, Civil Action No. 2-06CV-240-TJW and amended on June 16, 2006,
for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,813,497 Method for Providing Wireless Communication Services
and Network and System for Delivering of Same, or the 497 Patent, held by Leap. The complaint
seeks both injunctive relief and monetary damages, including treble damages and attorneys fees,
for our alleged willful infringement by our wireless communication systems and associated services
of the 497 patent. We have answered the complaint, raised a number of affirmative defenses, and
together with two related entities, counterclaimed against Leap and several related entities and
certain current and former employees of Leap, including Leaps CEO. In our counterclaims, we claim
that we do not infringe any valid or enforceable claim of the 497 Patent and we assert claims for
breach of contractual obligations, constructive trust, misappropriation, conversion and
misappropriation of trade secrets, misappropriation of confidential information, and breach of a
confidential relationship. Our counterclaims seek monetary and exemplary damages, and injunctive
relief. Certain of the Leap defendants, including its CEO, have answered our counterclaims, denied
our allegations and asserted affirmative defenses to our counterclaims. In connection with denying
a motion to dismiss by certain individual defendants, the court concluded that our claims against
those defendants were compulsory counterclaims.
On October 31, 2007, pursuant to a joint motion by the parties, the Court entered an order
administratively closing the suit. On February 14, 2008, the Court entered an order reopening the
action, and the court has scheduled the claims construction hearing for late June 2008 and trial
for early December 2008. We plan to vigorously defend against Leaps claims relating to the 497
Patent.
We have also tendered Leaps claims to the manufacturer of our network infrastructure
equipment, Alcatel Lucent, for indemnity and defense. Alcatel Lucent declined to indemnify and
defend us. We filed a petition in state district court in Harrison County, Texas, Cause No.
07-0710, for a declaratory ruling that Alcatel Lucent is obligated to cooperate, indemnify, defend
and hold us harmless from the Leap patent infringement action and for specific performance, for
injunctive relief and for breach of contract. Alcatel Lucent has responded to our petition and
requested that the Court dismiss, abate, stay, and deny every claim in our petition asserted
against Alcatel Lucent and order us to amend our petition. We have responded to Alcatel Lucents
request. The parties have agreed to postpone the hearing on Alcatel Lucents request. No hearing
is currently scheduled for Alcatel Lucents request. We intend to vigorously prosecute our action.
On September 22, 2006, Royal Street Communications filed a separate action in the United
States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, Civil Action No.
8:06-CV-01754-T-23TBM, seeking a declaratory judgment that Leaps 497 Patent is invalid and not
being infringed upon by Royal Street Communications. Leap responded to Royal Street
Communications complaint by filing a motion to dismiss Royal Street Communications complaint for
lack of jurisdiction or, in the alternative, that the action be transferred to the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, where Leap has brought suit
against the Company under the same patent. Royal Street Communications responded to this motion,
but the Court entered an Order transferring the action to the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, Civil Action No. 2:07-CV-00285-TJW, where it remains
pending. In February 2008, Leap answered the complaint and counterclaimed against Royal Street
Communications, alleging that Royal Street Communications willfully infringes the 497 Patent and
seeking both injunctive relief and monetary damages, including treble damages and attorneys fees,
for Royal Street Communications alleged willful infringement by its wireless communication systems
and associated services of the 497 patent. Leap has also filed a motion to consolidate this
action with the Leap action against us. Royal Street Communications has opposed such motion to
consolidate. Royal Street Communications plans to vigorously defend against Leaps claims relating
to the 497 Patent.
If Leap were successful in its claim for injunctive relief in either action, we and Royal
Street Communications could be enjoined from operating our respective businesses in the manner in
which we and Royal Street
45
Communications currently operate, which could require us and Royal Street Communications to
expend additional capital to change certain technologies and operating practices, or could prevent
both us and Royal Street Communications from offering some or all of the services we each provide
using some or all of our or Royal Street Communications existing systems. In addition, if Leap
were successful in its claim for monetary damages, we and Royal Street could be forced to pay Leap
substantial damages, including treble damages if found to have willfully infringed the 497 Patent,
for past infringement and/or ongoing royalties on a portion of both our revenues, which could
materially adversely impact our and Royal Street Communications financial performance. Further,
if Leap were successful, we and/or Royal Street could be required to pay Leaps attorneys fees.
On August 15, 2006, we filed a separate action in the California Superior Court, Stanislaus
County, Case No. 382780, against Leap and others for unfair competition, misappropriation of trade
secrets, interference with contracts, breach of contract, intentional interference with prospective
business advantage, and trespass. In this suit we seek monetary and punitive damages and
injunctive relief. We have amended our complaint in response to demurrers and motions filed by
Leap and Orders of the Court. On August 16, 2007, we filed our Third Amended Complaint which among
other things eliminated the trespass claims. On September 20, 2007, Defendants demurred to the
Third Amended Complaint alleging that the claims were uncertain and we have responded. On
October 24, 2007, the parties filed a stipulation to request that the Court stay the action and
discovery for 90 days following the entry of the Order granting the stay. On January 28, 2008, the
Court entered an order extending the stay of the action and of discovery until May 27, 2008. If the
Court reinstates the suit at the request of either party, we believe the Court will most likely set
new dates for the action and discovery. We plan to vigorously prosecute this action.
On January 7, 2008, Freedom Wireless, Inc., or Freedom Wireless, filed suit against Verisign,
Inc., our billing vendor, and several telecommunications providers who use Verisigns billing
system, including us, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California,
San Francisco Division, Civil Action Number CV-08-112-JL, for infringement of U.S. Patent
No. 5,722,067 entitled Security Cellular Telecommunications System, U.S. Patent No. 6,157,823
entitled Security Cellular Telecommunications System, and U.S. Patent No. 6,236,851 entitled
"Prepaid Security Cellular Telecommunications System, or collectively the Freedom Wireless
Patents, held by Freedom Wireless. The complaint seeks both injunctive relief and monetary
damages, including treble damages and attorneys fees, for our alleged willful infringement of the
Freedom Wireless Patents. We have tendered this action to Verisign and it has indicated it is
reviewing our indemnification request. Verisign also has indicated that it plans to leave the
telecommunications service business and cease providing us with billing services through the end of
our current contract. We can give no assurance that Verisign will defend us against this action or
that Verisign may not cease providing us with billing services altogether. We plan to vigorously
defend against Freedom Wireless claims related to the Freedom Wireless Patents.
If Freedom Wireless is successful in its claim for injunctive relief, we could be enjoined
from operating our business in the manner we operate currently, which could require us to redesign
our current billing or other systems, to expend additional capital to change certain of our
technologies and operating practices, or could prevent us from offering certain of our services.
In addition, if Freedom Wireless is successful in its claim for monetary damage, and Verisign does
not or is unable to pay such damages, we could be forced to pay substantial damages, including
treble damages and attorneys fees, for past infringement and/or ongoing royalties on a portion of
our revenues, which could materially adversely impact our financial performance. If Freedom
Wireless prevails in its action, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations. Moreover, the actions may consume valuable management time,
may be very costly to defend and may distract management attention away from our business.
In addition, we are involved in other litigation from time to time, including litigation
regarding intellectual property claims, that we consider to be in the normal course of business.
We are not currently party to any other pending legal proceedings that we believe would,
individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or
results of operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in Item 1A. Risk
Factors of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the SEC on February 29,
2008 other than the changes and additions to the Risk Factors set forth below.
46
Risks Related to Our Business
We face intense competition from other telecommunications providers which could adversely affect
our operating results and hinder our ability to grow.
We compete directly in each of our markets with other wireless, wireline, cable, and satellite
communications providers. Many of our current and prospective competitors are, or are affiliated
with, major companies that have substantially greater financial, technical, personnel and marketing
resources than we have (including spectrum holdings, brands and intellectual property) and larger
market share than we have, which may affect our ability to compete successfully. These competitors
often have established relationships with a larger base of current and potential customers. Some
of our competitors may undertake mergers and strategic alliances that allow them greater access to
capital, access to wider geographic territory, access to greater spectrum or attractive bundles of
services. Also, the FCC has taken certain regulatory actions designed to provide greater capacity
and flexibility to our competitors. For example, the FCC recently increased the amount of spectrum
in which CDMA operators of Mobile-Satellite Service, or MSS, low-earth orbit satellite systems in
the 1.6/2.4 GHz bands, or the Big LEO bands, may provide ancillary terrestrial component, or ATC,
service which may compete directly with our services. In addition, some of our competitors are or
are becoming or may become privately owned, which may provide them with certain advantages and
increased flexibility. Although our flat-rate, no long-term contract service offerings distinguish
us from many of our competitors, the competitive pressures of the wireless telecommunications
industry have caused, and may continue to cause, other carriers to offer unlimited service plans or
service plans with increasingly large bundles of minutes of use at increasingly lower prices. All
of our national wireless competitors have recently begun offering, and certain regional carriers
already offered, unlimited fixed-rate service plans in the markets we currently operate and plan to
operate and this may cause other wireless PCS competitors to also offer unlimited fixed-rate
service plans. Moreover, certain carriers we compete against, or may compete against in the
future, offer additional services, such as wireline phone service, cable or satellite television,
media and Internet, and are capable of bundling their wireless services with such other services in
a package of services that we may not be able to duplicate at competitive prices. In response to
competitive offerings, we have added, and in the future may be required to add, additional select
features to our existing service plans in our metropolitan areas, and we may consider additional
targeted promotional activities as we evaluate the competitive environment going forward. We will
be unable to launch fixed-rate unlimited service plans ahead of our competition in our new markets.
As a result, we expect that increased competition may result in more competitive pricing, slower
growth and increased churn of our customer base, as well as the possibility of having to change our
service plans in response to competition, which may result in lower revenues, lower ARPU, and lower
adjusted EBITDA.
Some of our competitors have technological capabilities or greater amounts of spectrum that we may
not be able to successfully compete with in our existing metropolitan areas or any new
metropolitan areas we may launch, which could materially and adversely affect our business and
financial results in the future.
Some of the carriers we compete against provide wireless services using cellular frequencies
in the 800 MHz band and in the future will use 700 MHz frequencies. These frequencies enjoy
propagation advantages over the PCS and AWS spectrum we currently hold or have access to, which may
cause us and Royal Street to have to spend more capital than our competitors in certain areas to
cover the same area. In addition, competitors and emerging technology companies may use
technologies which may have advantages over CDMA or use lower priced or unlicensed spectrum. Two
of our national wireless competitors acquired a significant portion of the 700 MHz spectrum
recently auctioned by the FCC. The national wireless carriers in many instances on average have
more spectrum in each of the metropolitan areas than we or Royal Street do. We may not be able to
obtain additional spectrum or offer certain services as a result of not being willing or able to
match the prices being offered or paid by large national carriers. As a result, we may experience
material and adverse effects on our business and financial results in the future.
A patent infringement suit has been filed against us by Leap which could have a material adverse
effect on our business or results of operations.
On June 14, 2006, Leap and Cricket Communications, Inc., or collectively Leap, filed suit
against us in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall
Division, for infringement of U.S. Patent
47
No. 6,813,497 Method for Providing Wireless Communication Services and Network and System for
Delivering of Same, or the 497 Patent, held by Leap. The complaint seeks both injunctive relief
and monetary damages, including treble damages and attorneys fees, for our alleged willful
infringement of such patent. The court has scheduled the claim construction hearing for late June
2008 and trial for early December 2008.
On September 22, 2006, Royal Street Communications filed a separate action in the United
States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, Civil Action No.
8:06-CV-01754-T-23TBM, seeking a declaratory judgment that Leaps 497 Patent is invalid and not
being infringed upon by Royal Street Communications. Leap responded to Royal Street
Communications complaint by filing a motion to dismiss Royal Street Communications complaint for
lack of jurisdiction or, in the alternative, that the action be transferred to the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, where Leap has brought suit
against the Company under the same patent. Royal Street Communications responded to this motion,
but the Court entered an Order transferring the action to the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, Civil Action No. 2:07-CV-00285-TJW, where it remains
pending. In February 2008, Leap answered the complaint and counterclaimed against Royal Street
Communications, claiming that Royal Street Communications willfully infringes the 497 Patent and
seeking both injunctive relief and monetary damages, including treble damages and attorneys fees,
for Royal Street Communications alleged willful infringement by its wireless communication systems
and associated services of the 497 patent. Leap also has filed a motion to consolidate this
action with its action against us. Royal Street Communications has opposed such motion.
If Leap were successful in its claim for injunctive relief in either action, we and Royal
Street Communications could be enjoined from operating our respective businesses in the manner in
which we and Royal Street Communications currently operate, which could require us and Royal Street
Communications to expend additional capital to change certain technologies and operating practices,
or could prevent both us and Royal Street Communications from offering some or all of the services
we each provide using some or all of the existing systems. In addition, if Leap were successful in
its claim for monetary damages, we and Royal Street Communications could be forced to pay Leap
substantial damages, including treble damages and attorneys fees, for past infringement and/or
ongoing royalties on a portion of both our revenues, which could materially adversely impact our
financial performance and Royal Street Communications financial performance.
We may be delayed in starting operations in the Auction 66 Markets because the incumbent licensees
may have unreasonable demands for relocation or may refuse to relocate.
The spectrum allocated for AWS currently is utilized by a variety of categories of existing
licensees (Broadband Radio Service, Fixed Service) as well as governmental users. The FCC rules
provide that a portion of the money raised in Auction 66 will be used to reimburse the relocation
costs of certain governmental users from the AWS band. However, not all governmental licensees are
obligated to relocate. To foster the relocation of non-governmental incumbent licensees, the FCC
also adopted a transition and cost sharing plan under which incumbent licensees can be reimbursed
for relocating out of the AWS band with the costs of relocation being shared by AWS licensees
benefiting from the relocation. The FCC has established rules requiring the new AWS licensee and
the non-governmental incumbent licensee to negotiate voluntarily for up to three years before the
non-governmental incumbent licensee is subject to mandatory relocation. If any incumbent
government licensee delays or refuses to relocate out of the AWS band in a metropolitan area where
we have been granted a license, we may be delayed or prevented from serving certain geographic
areas or customers within the metropolitan area and such inability may have a material adverse
effect on our financial performance and our future prospects. In addition, if any of the
non-governmental incumbent licensees refuse to voluntarily relocate, we may be delayed in using the
AWS spectrum granted to us and such delay may have a material adverse effect on our ability to
serve the metropolitan areas, our financial performance, and our future prospects. One government
incumbent user is the United States Department of Defense, or DoD who has notified us that our
planned use of the AWS spectrum in the Los Angeles metropolitan areas would interfere with existing
DoD systems and therefore we would not be permitted to use our AWS spectrum in advance of the
current DoD relocation schedules. The DOD Joint Spectrum Center, or JSC, is reviewing the
potential for interference by our planned systems with existing DoD systems in Los Angeles. If the
JSC concludes that our use of the AWS spectrum in the Los Angeles metropolitan area will cause
interference to incumbent DoD systems, we could be delayed from expanding service using the AWS
spectrum in the Los Angeles area.
48
We may in the future become subject to the FCCs anti-collusion rule in the course of upcoming FCC
auctions which may preclude us from engaging in certain activities.
Whenever we submit an application to participate in an auction of spectrum held by the FCC we
become subject to the FCCs anti-collusion rule. If we submit an application to participate in an
auction of spectrum held by the FCC, applicable FCC rules place certain restrictions on business
communications with other applicants. For example, the FCC has indicated that discussions with
other carriers regarding roaming agreements, the partitioning of markets or the disaggregation of
spectrum, or the acquisition of licenses or licensees, may implicate the anti-collusion rule if
both parties to the discussions are competing applicants in the auction and, in the course of the
discussions, the parties exchange information pertaining to or affecting their bids, bidding
strategy or the post-auction market structure. These anti-collusion restrictions may affect the
normal conduct of our business by inhibiting discussions and the conclusion of beneficial
transactions with other carriers from the time applications are due until after the conclusion of
the auction, which time period could be substantial. Failure to comply with the anti-collusion
rule may subject us, among other things, to fines and forfeitures and possible loss of any licenses
in which we were the high bidder.
The FCC may adopt rules requiring new point-to-multipoint emergency alert capabilities that would
require us to make costly investments in new network equipment and consumer handsets.
Congress recently passed the Warning, Alert, and Response Network Act, or the Act, which
requires the FCC to adopt, relevant technical standards, protocols, procedures and other technical
requirements based on such recommendations necessary to enable alerting capability for commercial
mobile radio service, or CMRS, providers that voluntarily elect to transmit emergency alerts. Under
the Act, a CMRS carrier can elect not to participate in providing such alerting capability. If a
CMRS carrier elects to participate, the carrier may not charge separately for the alerting
capability. In April 2008 the FCC completed its rulemaking. We are currently analyzing whether we
will elect to participate in providing such capability. If we decide to participate in providing
such alerting capability, it would require us to purchase new or additional equipment, which
amounts may be material, and may also require consumers to purchase new handsets. If we elect to
not participate and our competitors do elect to participate, we may experience slower growth and
higher churn if subscribers do not purchase our service or terminate their service because we do
not provide this capability, and such increase in churn or slower growth could have a material
adverse effect on our financial and operational results.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certifications of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to SEC Release 34-47551, this Exhibit is
furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be filed. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to SEC Release 34-47551, this Exhibit is
furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be filed. |
49
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
METROPCS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
Date: May 9, 2008 |
By: |
/s/ Roger D. Linquist
|
|
|
|
Roger D. Linquist |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 9, 2008 |
By: |
/s/ J. Braxton Carter
|
|
|
|
J. Braxton Carter |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
50
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certifications of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to SEC Release 34-47551, this Exhibit is
furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be filed. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to SEC Release 34-47551, this Exhibit is
furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be filed. |
51