UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-K

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007

 

of

 

ARRIS GROUP, INC.

 

 

A Delaware Corporation
IRS Employer Identification No. 58-2588724
SEC File Number 000-31254

 

3871 Lakefield Drive
Suwanee, GA 30024
(678) 473-2000

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common stock, $0.01 par value — NASDAQ Global Market System
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights — NASDAQ Global Market System

 

ARRIS Group, Inc. is a well-known seasoned issuer.

 

ARRIS Group, Inc. (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

 

Except as set forth in Item 10, ARRIS Group, Inc. is unaware of any delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K.

 

ARRIS Group, Inc. is a large accelerated filer and is not a shell company.

 

The aggregate market value of ARRIS Group, Inc.’s Common Stock held by non-affiliates as of June 29, 2007 was approximately $1.9 billion (computed on the basis of the last reported sales price per share of such stock of $17.59 on the NASDAQ Global Market System). For these purposes, directors, officers and 10% shareholders have been assumed to be affiliates.

 

As of January 31, 2008, 135,141,861 shares of ARRIS Group, Inc.’s Common Stock were outstanding.

 

Portions of ARRIS Group, Inc.’s Proxy Statement for its 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III.

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

As used in this Annual Report, “we,” “our,” “us,” “the Company,” and “ARRIS” refer to ARRIS Group, Inc. and our consolidated subsidiaries.

 

General

 

Our principal executive offices are located at 3871 Lakefield Drive, Suwanee, Georgia 30024, and our telephone number is (678) 473-2000. We also maintain a website at www.arrisi.com. On our website we provide links to copies of the annual, quarterly and current reports that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, any amendments to those reports, and all Company press releases. Investor presentations also frequently are posted on our website. Copies of our code of ethics and the charters of our board committees also are available on our website. We will provide investors copies of these documents in electronic or paper form upon request, free of charge.

 

Glossary of Terms

 

Below are commonly used acronyms in our industry and their meanings:

 

 

Overview

 

We are a global communications technology company specializing in integrated broadband network solutions that include products, systems and software for content and operations management, and professional services. We develop, manufacture and supply cable telephony, video and high-speed data equipment. In addition, we are a leading supplier of infrastructure products used by cable system operators to build-out and maintain HFC networks. We provide products and equipment principally to cable system operators and, more specifically, to MSOs. Our products allow MSOs and other broadband service providers to deliver a full range of integrated voice, video and high-speed data services to their subscribers. Our core strategy is to lead network operators through the transition to Internet Protocol-based networks by leveraging our extensive global installed base of products and experienced workforce to deliver network solutions that meet the business needs of our customers.

 

We operate in three segments:

 

1) Broadband Communications Systems (“BCS”)

 

2) Access, Transport and Supplies (“ATS”)

 

3) Media & Communications Systems (“MCS”)

 

A detailed description of each segment is contained below in “Our Principal Products.”

Industry Overview

 

In recent years, the technology offered by cable system operators has evolved significantly. Historically, cable system operators offered only one-way analog video service. In order to increase revenues and better position themselves competitively, MSOs have aggressively upgraded their networks, spending over 100 billion dollars during the past decade, to cost-effectively support and deliver enhanced voice, digital video and data services, such as high-speed data, telephony, digital video and video on demand.

 

By offering bundled packages of broadband services, these MSOs are seeking to gain a competitive edge over telephone companies and DBS providers, and to create additional revenue streams. Delivery of enhanced services also has helped MSOs offset slowing basic video subscriber growth and reduce their subscriber churn. To compete effectively against the DBS providers, MSOs have been upgrading and rebuilding their networks to offer digital video, which enables them to provide more channels and better picture quality than analog video. These upgrades to digital video also allow MSOs to roll out HDTV and new interactive services such as VOD. VOD services require video storage equipment and servers, systems to manage increasing amounts of different content and complementary devices capable of transporting, multiplexing and modulating signals to individual subscribers over a network. Additionally, the delivery of HDTV channels requires significantly more bandwidth than the equivalent number of standard definition channels. This demand for additional bandwidth is the key driver behind many of the changes being made to the cable operators’ network, and the investment in the products provided by ARRIS. One of the most significant changes that will occur over the next several years is a steady transition to an “all-digital” network. This is being done to reduce the amount of channel capacity dedicated to inefficient analog video by using digitized signals on the HFC plant. In most cases, this transition is being implemented in several steps by starting “digital simulcasting,” Digital simulcasting makes all channels available in digital format, in addition to simultaneously broadcasting the same channels in analog format for analog-only cable subscribers. This has further necessitated the growth and improvement in the transmission network to handle increased complexity and growth of network traffic. We are a leading provider of equipment enabling transmission of voice, video and data traffic within the MSO. We also are a leading provider of VOD server hardware and management software.

 

Another method being used by operators to more efficiently utilize the existing HFC capacity is to deploy a Switched Digital Video (“SDV”) capability. SDV provides the ability to transition from a Broadcast video paradigm to a Narrowcast video paradigm, in which a portion of the digital video broadcast programs are over-subscribed across a set of downstream channels. Only the channels being actively watched by consumers are ‘switched’ onto the HFC network by a smart EdgeQAM such as the D5 Universal EdgeQAM. This is a very cost-effective mechanism to reduce the number of channels required for Broadcast digital video, freeing up capacity for other services such as more HDTV or DOCSIS3.0 data services.

 

Demand for bandwidth capacity of cable systems is increasing as content providers (such as Google, Yahoo, YouTube, ABC, CBS, NBC, movie and music studios, and gaming vendors) are offering personalized content across multiple venues. For example, broadcast network shows and user-generated (“UG”) content, such as video downloads, personalized web pages, and video and photo sharing, have become commonplace on the Internet. Likewise, certain cable operators are experimenting with offering more content through the use of network personal video recorders (“nPVRs”) which, once copyright issues are resolved, are expected to add more traffic to the networks. Another bandwidth intensive service being offered by a major cable operator allows cable video subscribers to re-start programs on demand if they miss the beginning of a television show (time-shifted television). Television today has thus become more interactive and customized, thereby increasing the demands on the network. Further, the Internet has raised the bar on personalization with viewers increasingly looking for “similar” experience across screens — television, PC and phone, further increasing the challenges in delivering broadband content.

 

Cable operators are offering enhanced broadband services, including high definition television, digital video, interactive and on demand video services, high-speed Internet and voice over Internet Protocol. As these enhanced broadband services continue to attract new subscribers, we expect that cable operators will be required to invest in their networks to expand network capacity and support increased customer demand for personalized services. In the access portion, or “last-mile,” of the network, operators will need to upgrade headends, hubs, nodes, and radio frequency distribution equipment. While many domestic cable operators have substantially completed the initial

network upgrades necessary to provide enhanced broadband services, they will need to take a scalable approach to continue upgrades as new services are deployed. In addition, many international cable operators have not yet completed the initial upgrades necessary to offer such enhanced broadband services and are expected to continue purchasing equipment to complete these upgrades.

 

Data and VoIP services provided by the MSOs are governed by a set of technical specifications promulgated by CableLabs^® in North America and tComLabs^® in Europe. While the specifications developed by these two bodies necessarily differ in a few details in order to accommodate the differences in HFC network architectures between North America and Europe, a significant feature set is common. The primary data standard specification for cable operators in North America is entitled DOCSIS^®. Release 2.0 of DOCSIS^® is the current governing standard for data services in North America. The parallel release for European operators is Euro-DOCSIS^® Release 2.0. DOCSIS^® 2.0 builds upon the capabilities of DOCSIS^® 1.1 and adds additional throughput in the upstream portion of the cable plant — from the consumer out to the Internet. In addition to the DOCSIS^® standards that govern data transmission, CableLabs^® has defined the PacketCable^tm specifications for VoIP. These specifications define the interfaces between network elements such as cable modem termination systems, or CMTSs, multimedia terminal adapters, or MTAs, gateways and call management servers to provide high quality IP telephony service over the HFC network.

 

MSOs have benefited from the use of standard technologies like DOCSIS^® 1.1 and 2.0 and PacketCable^tm. One of the fastest growing services, based on DOCSIS^® and PacketCable^tm standards, offered by the MSOs is cable telephony. Cable telephony allows MSOs to offer their customers local and long distance residential telephone service. Constant bit rate, or CBR, technology was the technology of choice for telephone services until late 2004. Rapid maturation of voice over Internet protocol (“VoIP”) technology in 2003 and 2004 resulted in PacketCable^tm certified Internet protocol technology as the technology of choice for offering next-generation cable IP telephony services and, as a result, 2005 became a breakout year for the deployment of IP based voice services in the cable market. PacketCable^tm certified Voice over IP, or Cable VoIP, permits cable operators to utilize the ubiquitous IP protocol to deliver toll-quality cable telephony services. The broad adoption of Cable VoIP by the MSOs could potentially cannibalize the deployment of data-only cable modems, as the customer premises devices that support VoIP also offer high-speed data access on the same equipment. We are a leading supplier of both head-end and customer premises equipment for VoIP services over cable. The demand for single family residential Voice over IP subscriber devices (“EMTA”) has continued to grow at a steady rate since the technology was first introduced in 2003. Cable operators worldwide have adopted VoIP as the primary method to offer voice services, and deployments have started in almost all major cities. Price pressures are strong in this market and therefore revenue growth is lower than unit growth. However, because of our current leadership position in this market, we expect to be able to maintain cost leadership and to lead in innovations which could expand the size of the market by creating demand in commercial enterprise and multiple-dwelling unit applications.

 

The growing market strength of telecommunications service providers’ fiber-to-the-home (“FTTH”) services is mounting a significant threat to cable MSOs. As a competitive response, a new standard, DOCSIS 3.0 has been developed and commercial deployments are expected starting in 2008. DOCSIS 3.0 will allow MSOs to provide higher data rates to compete with fiber’s capability. DOCSIS 3.0 is also a key enabler of Video over IP where multiple channels can now be used to deliver video over a common network infrastructure. MSOs are beginning to investigate Video over IP as an alternative and are engaging the vendor community, including ARRIS, in discussions. ARRIS is actively developing DOCSIS 3.0 products.

 

Our Strategy

 

Our long-term business strategy includes the following key elements:

 

 

To fulfill our strategy, we develop technology, facilitate its implementation, and enable operators to put their subscribers in control of their entertainment, information, and communication needs. Through a set of business solutions that respond to specific market needs, we are integrating our products, software, and services solutions to work with our customers as they address Internet Protocol telephony deployment, high speed data deployment, high definition television content expansion, on demand video rollout, operations management, network integration, and business services opportunities.

 

Specific aspects of our strategy include, through both internal development effort and acquisitions:

 

Providing a Comprehensive Line of Broadband Products.  We offer a full range of high speed data, voice and video products including fiber optic transmission and radio frequency products with up to one gigahertz bandwidth capacity to transmit both radio frequency and optical signals in both directions over hybrid fiber coax networks between “the headend and the curb.”

 

Offering a Unified Video Platform for On Demand Services.  We offer a Unified Video Delivery Platform that allows network operators to offer a full line of on demand services such as switched digital video, video on demand, dynamic digital advertising, and network based-personal video recorders, from a single server and software management system. Using open industry standards, we help network operators build new systems and transition existing facilities.

 

Providing Integrated Software Solutions to Enhance Content and Operations Management.  Our applications-oriented Internet Protocol software allows cable operators to automate and proactively manage their networks to maximize quality of service and return on investment. Cable operators need enhanced network visibility, flexibility, and scalability to provide the latest services to their customers. Our modular, interoperable applications provide network operators with the subscriber management, content management, and network optimization and service assurance tools needed to capture revenue-generating opportunities.

 

Integrating Products, Content and Operations Management Systems, and Services for End-to-End Solutions.  We integrate our expertise in products, content and operations management systems, and professional services to offer customer-focused applications for expanding network capacity, combining video on demand programming with dynamic advertisements, coordinating management of network devices and services with technicians in the field, controlling network traffic and verifying subscriber usage levels, and managing the full lifecycle for deploying voice over Internet services.

 

Expansion via Strategic Acquisitions.  To further our strategy we recently acquired C-COR Incorporated., in a cash and stock transaction valued at approximately $680.4 million. The transaction closed on December 14, 2007. As a result of this acquisition, we now have substantially greater scale and critical mass, as well as greater product breadth and enhanced customer diversity. As the cable system industry has continued to consolidate, supplier scale and product breadth have become increasingly important. On a combined basis, we expect our increased product breadth and greater scale to be strategically relevant to our customers, thereby giving us an opportunity to capture a larger share of their spending. The combination of our industry-leading voice, data and video products together with leading access, transmission, video and software solutions better position the combined business than either company individually. Our new organization has an impressive global footprint with excellent customer and product line diversity and an even stronger international presence both in terms of sales and staff presence. The ability to offer end-to-end solutions should enable us to optimize customer relationships and derive greater product pull through.

 

Our Principal Products

 

A broadband cable system consists of three principal components:

 

 

 

We provide cable system operators with a comprehensive product offering for the headend, distribution network and subscriber premises. We divide our product offerings into three segments:

 

Broadband Communications Systems (“BCS”):

 

 

 

 

 

 

Access, Transport and Supplies (“ATS”):

 

 

 

 

 

Media & Communications Systems (“MCS”):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Broadband Communication Systems

 

Voice over IP and Data Products

 

Headend — The heart of a Voice over IP headend is a CMTS. A CMTS, along with a call agent, a gateway, and provisioning systems, provides the ability to integrate the Public-Switched Telephone Network, or PSTN, and high-speed data services over a HFC network. The CMTS provides the software and hardware to allow IP traffic from the Internet, or traffic used in VoIP telephony, to be converted for use on HFC networks. The CMTS is also responsible for initializing and monitoring all cable modems and EMTAs connected to the HFC network. We provide two products, the C4^®CMTS and the C3^® CMTS, used in the cable operator’s headend that provide VoIP and high-speed data services to residential or business subscribers. The CMTS is a highly complex, reliable, real-time sensitive element of a carrier-grade broadband network, responsible for ensuring the quality of the services provided.

 

Subscriber Premises — Subscriber premises equipment includes DOCSIS^® certified cable modems for high-speed data applications as well as Euro-DOCSIS^® certified versions and PacketCable^tm Certified EMTAs for VoIP applications in both DOCSIS^® and Euro-DOCSIS^® networks. The PacketCable^tm solution builds on DOCSIS^® and its quality of service enhancements to support lifeline telephony deployed over HFC networks. Our Touchstone^® product line provides carrier-grade performance to enable operators to provide all data, telephony and video services on the same network using common equipment. The Touchstone product line consists of the Touchstone CM550, WBM650, and WBM 750 series of cable modems and the Touchstone^® TM402, TM502, TM602 and TM702 series of telephony modems.

 

Video/IP Products

 

Headend — We market our Video / IP headend equipment as the D5^tm product line. The D5^tm Universal Edge QAM converts digital video and IP data into radio frequency signals that can be transmitted on a cable service provider’s HFC plant. The D5^tm Universal Edge QAM is compatible with DOCSIS^® cable modems as well as MPEG-2 and MPEG-4 set top boxes. The D5^tm Universal Edge QAM is ideal for service providers deploying video on demand and switched digital video (SDV) services where many unicast channels are required. The D5^tm Universal Edge QAM is also forward compatible with M-CMTS^tm standards being developed by CableLabs^®. A cable service provider can deploy the D5^tm Universal Edge QAM today for MPEG-2 digital video applications and convert it to modular CMTS and IPTV applications in the future.

 

Constant Bit Rate Products

 

Historically, we have offered a number of constant bit rate (CBR) voice over cable products. These CBR products have included, for headend equipment, our products under the brand name Cornerstone^® Voice, and for subscriber premises, our products marketed under the brand name Cornerstone^® Voice Port. However, since 2004, our customers have been migrating from CBR to VoIP. CBR product revenues are now immaterial.

Access Transport and Supplies

 

The traditional hybrid fiber coax network connects a headend to individual residential and or business users through a progression of fiber optic and coaxial cables and a variety of electrical and optical devices that modulate, transmit, receive, and amplify the radio frequency and optical signals as they move over the network. The local hybrid fiber coax network consists of three major components: the headend and hubs, optical nodes, and the radio frequency plant. We offer product lines for all three components in a variety of bandwidths, up to and including one Gigahertz capability, as well as coarse wave division multiplexing (CWDM) and denser wave division multiplexing (DWDM), which provide more capacity per subscriber over existing infrastructures or provide state-of-the-art capacity for new networks.

 

Headend and Hubs

 

We offer a broad range of managed and scalable headend and hub equipment for domestic and international applications. The benchmark design of our market leading CHP 5000 compact headend products with advanced CWDM and DWDM technologies lower the capital costs of delivering more bandwidth per subscriber while enabling network operators to increase their network capacity for advanced services, such as video on demand, high definition television, high speed Internet, and voice over Internet Protocol.

 

Nodes

 

The general function of the node in the local hybrid fiber coax network is to convert information from optical signals to radio frequency signals for distribution to the home or business. Our node series offers the performance service, and segmentability, and cost efficiency required to meet the demands of the most advanced network architectures. Our nodes utilize space and cost-saving scalable technology that allows network operators to have a “pay-as-they-grow” approach in deploying their infrastructure, minimizing capital expenditures while maximizing network service availability and performance. During 2007, we introduced a new, mid-sized scalable segmentable one Gigahertz fiber optic node used to segment networks to serve fewer homes and increase the effective network capacity available to each subscriber. This node complements a broader segmentable node offering and can be purchased as a complete product or it can be installed as an upgrade to our previously deployed trunk and bridger amplifiers. We also introduced the first segmentable cabinet style node targeted at the specific architectural demands of our European market.

 

Radio Frequency Products

 

The radio frequency products transmit information between the optical nodes and subscribers. These products are radio frequency amplifiers that come in various configurations such as trunks, bridgers, and line extenders to support both domestic and international markets. A trunk amplifier moves information across greater distances in a network and is typically used when the node serving area is greater than 500 homes or the home densities are low. A bridger splits the signal and amplifies it to higher levels in order to send it to a greater number of destinations. Line extenders move the signal through the last mile of the plant to the home or business. Representing one of the largest installed bases in the industry, our amplifiers use drop-in replacement modules to allow cost and timesaving upgrades for the operators. Many of these amplifiers are complemented by optical nodes upgrade kits to provide a wide array of options for the operators to enhance the capacity of their networks.

 

Supplies

 

We offer a variety of products that are used by MSOs to build and maintain their cable plants. Our products are complemented by our extensive distribution infrastructure, which is focused on providing efficient delivery of products from stocking or drop-ship locations.

 

We believe the strength of our product portfolio is our broad offering of trusted name-brand products, strategic proprietary product lines and our experience in distribution. Our name-brand products are manufactured to our specifications by manufacturing partners. These products include taps, line passives, house passives and premises installation equipment marketed under our Regal^® brand name; MONARCH^® aerial and underground plant construction products and enclosures; Digicon^® premium F-connectors; and FiberTel fiber optic connectivity

devices and accessories. Through our product selection, we are able to address substantially all broadband infrastructure applications, including fiber optics, outside plant construction, drop and premises installation, and signal acquisition and distribution.

 

We also resell products from hundreds of strategic supplier-partners, which include widely recognized brands to small specialty manufacturers. Through our strategic suppliers, we also supply ancillary products like tools and safety equipment, testing devices and specialty electronics.

 

Our customers benefit from our inventory management and logistics capabilities and services. These services range from just-in-time delivery, product “kitting,” specialized electronic interfaces, and customized reporting, to more complex and comprehensive supply chain management solutions. These services complement our product offerings with advanced channel-to-market and logistics capabilities, extensive product bundling opportunities, and an ability to deliver carrier-grade infrastructure solutions in the passive transmission portions of the network. The depth and breadth of our inventory and service capabilities enable us to provide our customers with single supplier flexibility.

 

Media & Communications Systems

 

Our integrated, application-oriented Internet Protocol solutions are designed to enable network operators to effectively deploy and manage revenue-generating, on demand entertainment and information services. Built on open industry standards, our solutions can be tailored to the operators’ needs — from a bundled suite to a point-specific application. Our solutions provide for an efficient and cost-effective transition to Internet Protocol-oriented network services.

 

On Demand and Ad Insertion

 

Our Unified Video Delivery Platform eliminates the need for multiple hardware and software management systems to deliver and manage video on demand (“VOD”), linear and demand-oriented advertising (“AdVOD”), network-based digital video recording (“nPVR”), and switched digital video (“SDV”) services. Also, this platform streams content and advertising to any device, whether mobile, personal computer, or standard, high definition and Internal Protocol television, all from a single server. Our content management system offers a set of management and technical business tools to help cable operators migrate networks to digital in order to efficiently allocate bandwidth and to lower operating costs. Our professional service personnel can add project management support for switched digital video implementation. In 2007, we announced a new product, VOD In a Box^tm, an on demand solution designed to reduce the complexity, cost, and time required to successfully deploy video on demand in smaller markets serving 25,000 digital customers or less.

 

nABLE^tm On Demand Software

 

Our On Demand Management System lets network operators manage all aspects of video on demand — the system, the content, and the business — from a single, integrated platform that gives real-time control and visibility to achieve maximum revenue. nABLE, which is at the heart of our unified video delivery platform, reduces manual intervention, simplifies operations, and reduces costs with one process to manage delivery of on demand services at corporate, regional, and local levels, all in real time and across different video on demand delivery systems.

 

Digital Advertising

 

Using our Digital Program Insertion (“DPI”), network operators can reach both digital and analog customers from one, cost-effective platform. This allows for a smooth, scalable transition from analog-only systems and helps raise revenues from a variety of advertising models, including high definition ad insertion with standard and high definition content, local and long form ads, and targeted advertising by geographic and demographic segment. Telescoping, a form of viewer selected advertising, puts the consumer in control by allowing users to seek successive levels of detail about a given product or service being advertised. In 2007, we announced our participation in a major market pilot of dynamic, real-time video on demand ad insertion, a key step in bringing personalized advertising to video on demand. We believe this integrated, dynamic advertising launch will also provide ad viewing data that allows advertisers to understand exactly how the ad was viewed on a daily basis.

Operations Management Systems

 

We provide a unified operations support system (“OSS”) suite of products that allows customers to ensure high levels of service availability through offering visibility, analysis, and control to address their bandwidth management, network optimization and assurance, and automated workforce needs. This OSS suite provides a set of applications that support network operators’ business and engineering needs by reducing the cost and complexity of managing standards-based (DOCSIS^®) and hybrid fiber coax networks while speeding deployment of new Internet Protocol services in cable networks.

 

Service Assurance

 

Customers can enhance and improve business processes with our Assurance applications (ServAssureTM) by reducing time to repair outages, minimizing truck rolls, and automating management of revenue-generating services. We provide the tools for cable operators to have a 360^o, real-time view of their networks. With over 20 million devices in subscribers’ homes being monitored worldwide, our Assurance applications help communicate network and device status across the entire network, proactively pinpointing outage locations and impact on subscribers, and forecasting and planning for maximum network capacity.

 

Service Fulfillment

 

Our Fulfillment application automates the effective utilization of bandwidth for delivering video on demand, Internet telephony, gaming, and a whole host of content applications available to consumers today. By ensuring standards-based quality of service (“QoS”), this tool lets network operators prioritize or de-prioritize specific data packets as needed, while providing an infrastructure for event-based billing based on bandwidth usage. The consumer is placed in control with tools to select from services on an as-needed, bandwidth on demand basis.

 

Mobile Workforce Management

 

Our suite of field service management tools combines browser-based business applications with real-time connectivity to the mobile workforce through wireless data connections and mobile computing devices. By managing service delivery and network integrity, we help network operators reduce operating expenses by minimizing the need to send technicians on service and maintenance calls while maximizing service quality and customer retention.

 

Fixed Mobile Convergence (“FMC”)

 

Our Mobility and Voice Call Continuity Application Servers provide a migration strategy for cable operators’ digital voice services, allowing them to evolve their existing landline voice service by degrees into a fully-converged landline and wireless offering. ARRIS is unique in bringing to the table both “loosely-coupled” convergence capabilities, such as our single-number service and full “dual mode” FMC capabilities deployable today, together with the client-side and wireless network partnerships necessary to make deployments happen.

 

Sales and Marketing

 

We are positioned to serve customers worldwide with a strong sales organization complemented by our sales engineering and professional services team. We maintain sales offices in Colorado, Georgia and Pennsylvania in the United States, and in Argentina, Chile, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, The Netherlands, and Spain. Our sales engineering team assists customers in system design and specification and can promptly be onsite to resolve any problems that may arise during the course of a project. Our Network Services provides outsourced professional services through experienced and highly skilled personnel who work with network operators to design and keep their networks operating at peak performance. Core competencies include network engineering and design, project management for launching advanced applications over complex broadband networks, and solutions to move today’s sophisticated networks forward to Internet Protocol and digital services.

 

Additionally, we have agreements in various countries and regions with VARs, sales representatives and channel partners that extend our sales presence into markets without established sales offices. We also maintain an

inside sales group that is responsible for regular phone contact with the customer, prompt order entry, timely and accurate delivery, and effective sales administration.

 

Our marketing and product management teams focus on each of the various product categories and work with our engineers and various technology suppliers on new products and product enhancements. These teams are responsible for inventory levels and pricing, delivery requirements, analysis of market demand, and product positioning and advertising.

 

We are committed to providing superior levels of customer service by incorporating innovative customer-centric strategies and processes supported by business systems designed to deliver differentiating product support and value-added services. We have implemented advanced customer relationship management programs to bring additional value to our customers and provide significant value to our operations management. Through these information systems, we can provide our customers with product information ranging from operational manuals to the latest product updates. Through on-going development and refinement, these programs will help to improve our productivity and enable us to further improve our customer-focused services.

 

Additionally, we provide 24x7 technical support, directly and through channel partners, as well as training for customers and channel partners, as required, both in our facilities and at our customers’ sites.

 

Customers

 

The vast majority of our sales are to cable system operators worldwide. As the U.S. cable industry continued a trend toward consolidation, the six largest MSOs controlled approximately 89.2% of the RGUs within the U.S. cable market (according to Dataxis in the third quarter 2007), thereby making our sales to those MSOs critical to our success. Our sales are substantially dependent upon a system operator’s selection of ARRIS’ network equipment, demand for increased broadband services by subscribers, and general capital expenditure levels by system operators. Our two largest customers (including their affiliates, as applicable) are Comcast, and Time Warner Cable. From time-to-time, the affiliates included in our revenues from these customers have changed as a result of mergers and acquisitions. Therefore, the revenue for our customers for prior periods has been adjusted to include, on a comparable basis for all periods presented, the affiliates currently understood to be under common control. Our sales to these customers for the last three years were:

 

 

We have executed general purchase agreements (“GPAs”) with several of our large customers that detail the commercial terms and conditions for sales. These GPAs do not obligate the customer to a specific volume of business. The vast majority of our sales, whether to customers with GPAs or otherwise, result from periodic purchase orders. A summary of the status of the GPAs with Comcast, and Time Warner Cable, Inc. follows:

 

Comcast.  Effective August 29, 2007, we consolidated into a single agreement our existing agreements to supply Comcast with C4^® CMTS equipment, Touchstone Telephony Modems, and cable television supplies. We also added D5^tm Edge QAM products to the agreement and extended the term until December 31, 2009. Comcast is also a customer for our VOD and Ad Insertion products governed under agreements with C-COR that pre-date our recent acquisition.

 

Time Warner Cable, Inc.  We supply Time Warner Cable ARRIS Touchstone Telephony Modems, C4^® CMTS products, VOD, Optical and RF Infrastructure products and Assurance products under various agreements, including several agreements with C-COR that pre-date our recent acquisition. The agreements to supply Touchstone^® Telephony Modems, multi-line EMTAs for deployment of Commercial Services, and C4^® CMTS products to Time Warner Cable expire on December 31, 2008.

International Operations

 

Our international revenue is generated primarily from Asia-Pacific, Europe, Latin America and Canada. The Asia-Pacific market includes China, Japan, Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan. The European market includes Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland. The Latin American market includes Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru and Puerto Rico. Revenues from international customers were approximately 27.0%, 25.1% and 27.1% of total revenues for 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

 

We continue to strategically invest in worldwide marketing and sales efforts, which have yielded some promising results in several regions. We currently maintain international sales offices in Argentina, Chile, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, The Netherlands, and Spain.

 

Research and Development

 

We operate in an industry that is subject to rapid changes in technology. Our ability to compete successfully depends in large part upon anticipating such changes. Accordingly, we engage in ongoing research and development activities in response to our customers’ needs with the intention to advance existing product lines and/or develop new offerings. We are committed to rapid innovation and the development of new technologies in the evolving broadband market. New products are developed in our research and development laboratories in Beaverton, Oregon; Cork, Ireland; Lisle, Illinois; Shenzhen, China; State College, Pennsylvania; Suwanee, Georgia; and Wallingford, Connecticut. We also form strategic alliances with world-class producers and suppliers of complementary technology to provide “best-in-class” technologies focused on “time-to-market” solutions.

 

We believe that our future success depends on our rapid adoption and implementation of broadband local access industry specifications, as well as rapid innovation and introduction of technologies that provide service and performance differentiation. To that end, we believe that the C4^® CMTS product line continues to lead the industry in areas such as fault tolerance, wire-speed throughput and routing, and density. The C3^tm CMTS is designed for small to mid-size operators who are looking for a CMTS that delivers superior RF performance while only occupying one rack unit of space for delivering high-speed data services, including VPN services. We announced several significant new customer wins during 2007 for the CMTS product line. Notable wins include, Cablemas, Wide Open West (WOW) and Katch. The Touchstone^® product line offers a wide-range of DOCSIS^®, Euro-DOCSIS^® and PacketCable^tm certified products, including Touchstone^® Cable Modems, Touchstone^® Telephony Modems and Touchstone^® Telephony Ports. The D5^tm Universal Edge QAM is the first dense edge QAM to provide a forward path to the modular CMTS of the future. We won a significant order with Comcast for Switched Digital Video delivery application for this product line in the third quarter of 2007.

 

Additionally our research and development has focused on 1 GHz access products. We were the first to introduce this type of product in the industry. In particular, our CHP 5000 headend platform and OptoMax nodes provide a wide variety of options to the operator to extend the capacity of their existing infrastructures through service group segmentation or multi-wavelength optical transport. We are also continuously improving our market leading VOD back-office systems and Ad Insertion products. Enhancements include innovations that improve subscriber experience and help control the MSOs’ operational expenditures.

 

Research and development expenses in 2007, 2006, and 2005 were approximately $71.2 million, $66.0 million, and $60.1 million, respectively. These costs include allocated common costs associated with information technologies and facilities.

 

The following trends impact our current product development activities:

 

 

 

As a result, our product development activities are directed, primarily, in the following areas:

 

 

 

Intellectual Property

 

We have an aggressive program for protecting our intellectual property. As of January 31, 2008, the program consists of maintaining our portfolio of 147 issued patents (both U.S. and foreign) and pursuing patent protection on new inventions (currently more than 200 U.S. patent applications and U.S. provisional patent applications are pending plus 31 pending foreign applications). In our effort to pursue new patents, we have created a process whereby employees may submit ideas of inventions for review by management. The review process evaluates each submission for novelty, detectability, and commercial value. Patent applications are filed on the inventions that meet the criteria. ARRIS has 45 registered or pending trademarks. In addition, we hold an exclusive license, for use in our field, of numerous patents relating to fiber optic and radio frequency transmission equipment and technology, and network management techniques and services.

 

Our patents and patent applications generally are in the areas of telecommunications hardware and related technologies. Our recent research and development has led to a number of patent applications in technology related to DOCSIS^®. Our January 2002 purchase of the assets of Cadant^® resulted in the acquisition of 19 U.S. patent applications, seven Patent Convention Treaty (“PCT”) applications, five trademark applications, one U.S. registered trademark and five registered copyrights. The Cadant^® patents are in the area of CMTS. Our March 2003 purchase of the assets of Atoga Systems resulted in the acquisition of 5 U.S. patent applications. Our Atoga patents are in the area of network traffic flow. In August 2003, we acquired various assets of Com21, Inc. Included in those assets were 16 issued U.S. patents plus 18 U.S. patent applications. The Com21 patents cover a wide range of technologies, including wide area networks, fiber and cable systems, automated teller machine networks and CMTS. In 2005, we acquired assets of coaXmedia, Inc. including 7 currently pending U.S. patent applications, primarily in the field of providing broadband access in a multi-user environment. Our December 2007 purchase of C-COR resulted in the acquisition of 61 issued U.S. patents, 59 U.S. patent applications, and an exclusive license, for use in our field, of numerous patents relating to fiber optic and radio frequency transmission equipment and technology, and network management techniques and services. The C-COR patents are in the area of fiber optic and radio frequency transmission equipment and technology, and network management techniques and services.

 

For technology that is not owned by us, we have a program for obtaining appropriate licenses with the industry leaders to ensure that the strongest possible patents support the licensed technology. In addition, we have formed strategic relationships with leading technology companies that will provide us with early access to technology and will help keep us at the forefront of our industry.

 

We have a program for protecting and developing trademarks. This program consists of procedures for the use of current trademarks and for the development of new trademarks. This program is designed to ensure that our employees properly use those trademarks and any new trademarks that are expected to develop strong brand loyalty and name recognition. This is intended to protect our trademarks from dilution or cancellation.

From time-to-time there are significant disputes with respect to the ownership of the technology used in our industry and patent infringements. See Part I, Item 3, “Legal Proceedings”

 

Product Sourcing and Distribution

 

Our product sourcing strategy for products other than Access and Transport products centers on the use of contract manufacturers to produce our products. Our largest contract manufacturers are Solectron, Plexus Services Corporation, Flextronics, and Unihan (formerly ASUSTeK Computer Inc). The facilities owned and operated by these contract manufacturers for the production of our products are located primarily in China, Ireland, Mexico, and the United States.

 

We have contracts with each of these contract manufacturers. We provide these vendors with a 6-month or 12-month rolling, non-binding forecasts, and we typically have a minimum of 60 days of purchase orders placed with them for products. Purchase orders for delivery within 60 days are generally not cancelable. Purchase orders with delivery past 60 days generally may be cancelled with penalties in accordance with each vendor’s terms. Each contract manufacturer provides us with a minimum 15-month warranty.

 

We manufacture our Access and Transport products in our own manufacturing facility in Tijuana, Mexico, which was acquired as part of our acquisition of C-COR. The factory is 89,400 square feet, and we employ approximately 615 employees. Typical items purchased for our manufactured products are fiber optic lasers, photo receivers, radio frequency hybrids, printed circuit boards, die cast aluminum housings, and standard electronic components. Although some of the components we use are single sourced, generally there are alternate sources, if needed. We outsource the manufacture and repair of certain assemblies and modules where it is cost effective to do so or where there are advantages with respect to delivery times. Current outsourcing arrangements include European versions of amplifiers, certain power supplies, accessories, optical modules, digital return modules, circuit boards, repair services, and small-lot manufacturing.

 

We distribute a substantial number of products that are not produced by us in order to provide our customers with a comprehensive product offering. For instance, we distribute hardware and installation products that are distributed through regional warehouses in California, Japan, The Netherlands, and North Carolina and through drop shipments from our contract manufacturers located throughout the world.

 

We obtain key components from other suppliers. Broadcom provides several DOCSIS^® components in our CMTS product line. We also make extensive use of FPGA in our C4^® CMTS. Texas Instruments and Microtune provide components used in some of our customer premises equipment, or CPE, products (i.e., EMTAs and cable modems). Our agreements with Texas Instruments include technology licensing and component purchases. Several of our competitors have similar agreements with Texas Instruments for these components. In addition, we purchase software for operating network and security systems or sub-systems, and a variety of routing protocols from different suppliers under standard commercial terms, including source code buy-out arrangements. Although alternate supply and technology arrangements similar to the above are available or could be arranged, an interruption with any of the above companies could have a material impact on our business.

 

Backlog

 

Our backlog consists of unfilled customer orders believed to be firm and long-term contracts that have not been completed. With respect to long-term contracts, we include in our backlog only amounts representing orders currently released for production or, in specific instances, the amount we expect to be released in the succeeding 12 months. The amount contained in backlog for any contract or order may not be the total amount of the contract or order. The amount of our backlog at any given time does not reflect expected revenues for any fiscal period.

 

Our backlog at December 31, 2007, was approximately $136.7 million, at December 31, 2006, was approximately $92.7 million and at December 31, 2005, was approximately $166.5 million. The increase in backlog from 2006 to 2007, included $42.4 million attributable to C-COR. The decline in backlog from 2005 to 2006 reflects a shortening of lead times by our customers and lower orders on hand for CBR equipment as this product nears end of life.

 

We believe that all of the backlog existing at December 31, 2007, will be shipped in 2008.

Anticipated orders from customers may fail to materialize and delivery schedules may be deferred or canceled for a number of reasons, including reductions in capital spending by network operators, customer financial difficulties, annual capital spending budget cycles, and construction delays.

 

Competition

 

The broadband communication systems markets are dynamic and highly competitive and require companies to react quickly and capitalize on change. We must retain skilled and experienced personnel, as well as deploy substantial resources to meet the changing demands of the industry and must be nimble to be able to capitalize on change. We compete with national, regional and local manufacturers, distributors and wholesalers including some companies that are larger than we are. Our major competitors include:

 

 

Our products are marketed with emphasis on quality, advanced technology, differentiating features, flexibility, and business solutions, and are generally priced competitively with other manufacturers’ product lines. Product reliability and performance, technological innovation, responsive customer service, breadth of product offering, and pricing are several of the key criteria for competition.

 

One of the principal growth markets for us is the high speed data access market into which we sell a CMTS, or, the headend product for data and VoIP services. The largest provider of CMTS products is Cisco, which took an early lead in the initial deployment of data-only CMTS products. Cisco is expected to defend its position via both upgrades to existing products and the introduction of new products. Cisco had not previously developed a carrier-grade telephony CMTS product, but has begun to market the carrier-grade capability. Motorola also has been emphasizing routing and carrier-grade performance for its CMTS. In 2007, one of our major competitors in this market, BigBand Networks, exited the market. We believe we have garnered additional market share in the newer generation CMTS products that enable both data and carrier-grade telephony deployments due to our products’ differentiating features, fault tolerance, wire-speed throughput, routing, and density.

 

The customer premises business consists of voice over IP enabled modems (“EMTAs”) and cable modems. Motorola is the market leader in cable modems. Leadership position in the customer premises category provides Motorola with volume advantages in manufacturing, distribution and marketing expense. Motorola also was successful in gaining an early leader status in EMTA sales with MSOs that were the first to deploy VoIP. However, as this market accelerated, we have gained the leading share position in the market. We compete on product performance, our telephony experience, integration capabilities, and price. Cisco via its Scientific-Atlanta acquisition also has had some success in the cable modem market. Cisco also has EMTA products and competes in this market. Thomson is also an EMTA competitor and gained share, particularly with Comcast, in late 2007. The EMTA market grew dramatically in 2006 and again in 2007 as VoIP deployments accelerated. We are a relatively small competitor in the cable modem market, but have a significantly larger share of the EMTA market.

Specifically, we maintained number one EMTA market share throughout 2005, 2006 and 2007 and had over 50% of the world market in the third quarter of 2007 according to Infonetics Research “Broadband CPE Quarterly Worldwide Market Share and Forecasts for 3Q07.”

 

Our content and operations management systems compete with several vendors offering on demand video and digital advertising insertion hardware and software, including SeaChange International Inc., TandbergTV and Concurrent Computer Corporation, as well as vendors offering network management, mobile workforce management, network configuration management, and network capacity management systems in the United States, some of which may currently have greater sales in these areas than we do. In some instances, our customers internally develop their own software for operations support systems. However, we believe that we offer a more integrated solution that gives us a competitive advantage in supporting the requirements of both today’s hybrid fiber coax networks and the emerging all-digital, packet-based networks.

 

We also compete with Motorola, Cisco and Aurora Networks for products within the Access, Transport and Supplies group. Various manufacturers, who are suppliers to us, also sell directly to our customers, as well as through other distributors, into the cable marketplace. In addition, because of the convergence of the cable, telecommunications and computer industries and rapid technological development, new competitors may enter the cable market.

 

In the supplies distribution business we compete with national distributors, such as TVC Communications, Inc. and Commscope and with several local and regional distributors. Product breadth, price, availability and service are the principal competitive advantages in the supply business. Our products in the supplies distribution business are competitively priced and are marketed with emphasis on quality. Product reliability and performance, superior and responsive technical and administrative support, and breadth of product offerings are key criteria for competition. Technological innovations and speed to market are additional competitive factors.

 

Our Network Professional Services group competes in the United States with several vendors that offer similar services to those provided by us. We compete on the basis of quality and scope of service and offerings, ability to meet work schedules, and price by offering network integration professional services and design services to our customers.

 

Lastly, some of our competitors, notably Cisco and Motorola, are larger companies with greater financial resources and product breadth than us. This may enable them to bundle products or be able to market and price products more aggressively than we can.

 

Employees

 

As of January 31, 2008, we had 1,992 full-time employees. ARRIS has no employees represented by unions within the United States. We believe that we have maintained a strong relationship with our employees. Our future success depends, in part, on our ability to attract and retain key personnel. Competition for qualified personnel in the cable industry is intense, and the loss of certain key personnel could have a material adverse effect on us. We have entered into employment contracts with our key executive officers and have confidentiality agreements with substantially all of our employees. We also have long-term incentive programs that are intended to provide substantial incentives for our key employees to remain with us.

 

Our business is dependent on customers’ capital spending on broadband communication systems, and reductions by customers in capital spending adversely affect our business.

 

Our performance is dependent on customers’ capital spending for constructing, rebuilding, maintaining or upgrading broadband communications systems. Capital spending in the telecommunications industry is cyclical and can be curtailed or deferred on short notice. A variety of factors affect the amount of capital spending, and, therefore, our sales and profits, including:

 

 

Several of our customers have accumulated significant levels of debt. These high debt levels, coupled with the current turbulence and uncertainty in the capital markets, have affected the market values of domestic cable operators and may impact their access to capital in the future. Even if the financial health of our customers remains intact, we cannot assure you that these customers will be in a position to purchase new equipment at levels we have seen in the past or expect in the future.

 

The markets in which we operate are intensely competitive, and competitive pressures may adversely affect our results of operations.

 

The markets for broadband communication systems are extremely competitive and dynamic, requiring the companies that compete in these markets to react quickly and capitalize on change. This requires us to retain skilled and experienced personnel as well as to deploy substantial resources toward meeting the ever-changing demands of the industry. We compete with national and international manufacturers, distributors and wholesalers including many companies that are larger than we are. Our major competitors include:

 

 

The rapid technological changes occurring in the broadband markets may lead to the entry of new competitors, including those with substantially greater resources than our own. Because the markets in which we compete are characterized by rapid growth and, in some cases, low barriers to entry, smaller niche market companies and start-up ventures also may become principal competitors in the future. Actions by existing competitors and the entry of new competitors may have an adverse effect on our sales and profitability. The broadband communications industry is further characterized by rapid technological change. In the future, technological advances could lead to the obsolescence of some of our current products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

Further, many of our larger competitors are in a better position to withstand any significant reduction in capital spending by customers in these markets. They often have broader product lines and market focus and therefore are not as susceptible to downturns in a particular market. In addition, several of our competitors have been in operation longer than we have been, and therefore they have more established relationships with domestic and foreign broadband service users. We may not be able to compete successfully in the future, and competition may negatively impact our business.

 

Consolidations in the telecommunications industry could result in delays or reductions in purchases of products, which would have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

The telecommunications industry has experienced the consolidation of many industry participants, and this trend may continue. For instance, in July 2006, Adelphia sold its assets to Comcast and Time Warner. When consolidations occur, it is possible that the acquirer will not continue using the same suppliers, thereby possibly resulting in an immediate or future elimination of sales opportunities for us or our competitors, depending upon who had the business initially. Consolidations also could result in delays in purchasing decisions by the merged businesses. The purchasing decisions of the merged companies could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

Mergers among the supplier base also have increased, and this trend may continue. For example, in February 2006, Cisco Systems, Inc. acquired Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.; in April 2007, Ericsson acquired TANDBERG Television ASA; and in July 2007, Motorola, Inc. acquired Terayon, Inc. Larger combined companies with pooled capital resources may be able to provide solution alternatives with which we would be put at a disadvantage to compete. The larger breadth of product offerings by these consolidated suppliers could result in customers electing to trim their supplier base for the advantages of one-stop shopping solutions for all of their product needs. Consolidation of the supplier base could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

We may pursue acquisitions and investments that could adversely affect our business.

 

In the past, we have made acquisitions of and investments in businesses, products, and technologies to complement or expand our business. While we have no announced plans for additional acquisitions, future acquisitions are part of our strategic objectives and may occur. If we identify an acquisition candidate, we may not be able to successfully negotiate or finance the acquisition or integrate the acquired businesses, products, or technologies with our existing business and products. Future acquisitions could result in potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities, the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities, amortization expenses, and substantial goodwill.

 

We may fail to realize the anticipated revenue and earnings growth and other benefits expected from our recently completed acquisition of C-COR, which could adversely affect the value of our shares.

 

Our recently completed acquisition of C-COR involves the integration of two companies that previously operated independently. The integration of two previously independent companies is a challenging, time-consuming and costly process. While we have begun the integration process, complete integration will take some time to accomplish. The value of shares of our common stock will be affected by our ability to achieve the benefits expected to result from the acquisition. Achieving the benefits of the merger will depend in part upon meeting the challenges inherent in the successful combination of two business enterprises of the size and scope of ARRIS and C-COR, and the possible resulting diversion of management’s attention for an extended period of time. It is possible that the process of combining the companies could result in the loss of key employees, the disruption of our ongoing businesses, or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures, and policies that adversely affect our ability to maintain

relationships with customers, suppliers, and employees, or to achieve the anticipated benefits of the merger. In addition, the successful combination of the companies will require the dedication of significant management resources, which could temporarily divert attention from the day-to-day business of the combined company.

 

There can be no assurance that these challenges will be met and that the diversion of management attention will not negatively impact our operations. Delays encountered during the current transition process could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, expenses, operating results, and financial condition. Although we expect significant benefits, such as revenue and earnings growth, to result from the merger, there can be no assurance that we will actually realize any of these anticipated benefits.

 

Purchase accounting adjustments required under GAAP with respect to our acquisition of C-COR will have a significant impact on our GAAP earnings, which could impact the trading price of our common stock.

 

Under U.S. GAAP, we accounted for the C-COR acquisition using a set of accounting rules known as “purchase accounting,” whereby the assets and liabilities of C-COR were recorded at fair value as of the date of acquisition. In connection with the acquisition, certain adjustments made as a result of the purchase accounting requirements will have a significant adverse effect on our GAAP earnings for at least the next year. These adjustments include, but are not limited to, fair market value adjustments to C-COR’s inventory, intangible assets, in-process research and development, and deferred revenue. For instance, the deferred revenue that was reflected as a liability in C-COR’s financial statements and that, absent the merger, would have been recognized over time as revenue has been substantially eliminated, thereby resulting in reduced revenues until the level of deferred revenue (or revenue that is instead recognized on a current basis) again builds to the levels present immediately prior to the merger. The initial purchase accounting adjustments, and their subsequent impact on financial results, do not necessarily reflect our future expected cash flows following the merger; however, the negative impact of such adjustments on our GAAP earnings could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.

 

Our results of operations after the proposed C-COR acquisition could be adversely affected as a result of goodwill impairment.

 

Under GAAP, when we acquire a business, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, Accounting for Business Combinations, requires us to record an asset called “goodwill” in an amount equal to the amount we pay for the business, including liabilities assumed, in excess of the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets of the business. Our recently completed acquisition of C-COR resulted in the recognition of approximately $305 million in additional goodwill as of December 31, 2007. SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, requires that goodwill and other intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives not be amortized, but instead be tested at least annually for impairment, and that intangible assets that have finite useful lives be amortized over their useful lives. In testing for impairment, SFAS No. 142 provides specific guidance for testing goodwill and other non-amortized intangible assets for impairment. SFAS No. 142 requires us to make certain estimates and assumptions, including, among other things, an assessment of market conditions and projections of cash flows, investment rates and cost of capital and growth rates. These estimates and assumptions can significantly impact the reported value of goodwill and other intangible assets. Absent any impairment indicators, we perform our impairment tests annually during the fourth quarter. Any future impairment would negatively impact our results of operations for the period in which the impairment is recognized.

 

Our business has primarily come from several key customers. The loss of one of these customers or a significant reduction in sales to one of these customers would have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

Our two largest customers (including their affiliates, as applicable) are Comcast, and Time Warner Cable. For the year ended December 31, 2007, taking into account the acquisition of C-COR in December 2007, sales to Comcast accounted for approximately 39.8%, and sales to Time Warner Cable accounted for approximately 10.7% of our total revenue. The loss of any of these customers, or one of our other large customers, or a significant reduction in the products or services provided to any of them would have a material adverse impact on our business. For each of these customers, we also are one of their largest suppliers. A consequence of that, if from time-to-time customers elect to purchase products from our competitors in order to diversify their supplier base and to

dual-source key products or to curtail purchasing due to budgetary or market conditions, such decisions could have material consequences to our business. In addition, because of the magnitude of our sales to these customers the terms and timing of our sales are heavily negotiated, and even minor changes can have a significant impact upon or business.

 

Forecasted reduction in sales

 

For instance, the recently announced reduction in purchases by Comcast will affect our business. In addition, more so than historically, in recent years our customers have submitted their purchase orders less evenly over the course of each quarter and year and with shorter lead times. This has made it more difficult for us to forecast sales and other financial measures and plan accordingly.

 

The broadband products that we develop and sell are subject to technological change and a trend toward open standards, which may impact our future sales and margins.

 

The broadband products we sell are subject to continuous technological evolution. Further, the cable industry has and will continue to demand a move towards open standards. The move toward open standards is expected to increase the number of MSOs that will offer new services, in particular, telephony. This trend also is expected to increase the number of competitors and drive capital costs per subscriber deployed down. These factors may adversely impact both our future revenues and margins.

 

Failure to increase our Media & Communications Systems revenue would adversely affect our financial results.

 

Media & Communications Systems is expected to be our fastest growing and highest gross margin segment. If we are unable to grow revenues in this area, it will limit our ability to increase earnings and likely have an adverse effect on our stock price. Our ability to increase the revenue generated by our MCS segment depends on many factors that are beyond our control. For example:

 

 

Fluctuations in our Media & Communications Systems sales result in greater volatility in our operating results.

 

The level of our Media & Communications Systems sales fluctuate significantly quarter to quarter and results in greater volatility of our operating results than has been typical in the past, when the main source of volatility was the high proportion of quick-turn product sales. The timing of revenue recognition on software and system sales is based on specific contract terms and, in certain cases, is dependent upon completion of certain activities and

customer acceptance which are difficult to forecast accurately. Because the gross margins associated with software and systems sales are substantially higher than our average gross margins, fluctuations in quarterly software sales have a disproportionate effect on operating results and earnings per share and could result in our operating results falling short of the expectations of securities analysts and investors.

 

Products currently under development may fail to realize anticipated benefits.

 

Rapidly changing technologies, evolving industry standards, frequent new product introductions and relatively short product life cycles characterize the markets for our products. The technology applications that we currently are developing may not ultimately be successful. Even if the products in development are successfully brought to market, they may not be widely used or we may not be able to successfully capitalize on their technology. To compete successfully, we must quickly design, develop, manufacture and sell new or enhanced products that provide increasingly higher levels of performance and reliability. However, we may not be able to successfully develop or introduce these products if our products:

 

 

Furthermore, our competitors may develop similar or alternative technologies that, if successful, could have a material adverse effect on us. Our strategic alliances are based on business relationships that have not been the subject of written agreements expressly providing for the alliance to continue for a significant period of time. The loss of a strategic relationship could have a material adverse effect on the progress of new products under development with that third party.

 

Our success depends in large part on our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel in all facets of our operations.

 

Competition for qualified personnel is intense, and we may not be successful in attracting and retaining key personnel, including former C-COR personnel, which could impact our ability to maintain and grow our operations. Our future success will depend, to a significant extent, on the ability of our management to operate effectively. In the past, competitors and others have attempted to recruit our employees and in the future, their attempts may continue. The loss of services of any key personnel, the inability to attract and retain qualified personnel in the future or delays in hiring required personnel, particularly engineers and other technical professionals, could negatively affect our business.

 

We are substantially dependent on contract manufacturers, and an inability to obtain adequate and timely delivery of supplies could adversely affect our business.

 

Many components, subassemblies and modules necessary for the manufacture or integration of our products are obtained from a sole supplier or a limited group of suppliers. Our reliance on sole or limited suppliers, particularly foreign suppliers, and our reliance on subcontractors involves several risks including a potential inability to obtain an adequate supply of required components, subassemblies or modules and reduced control over pricing, quality and timely delivery of components, subassemblies or modules. Historically, we have not maintained long-term agreements with any of our suppliers or subcontractors. An inability to obtain adequate deliveries or any other circumstance that would require us to seek alternative sources of supply could affect our ability to ship products on a timely basis. Any inability to reliably ship our products on time could damage relationships with current and prospective customers and harm our business.

Our international operations may be adversely affected by any decline in the demand for broadband systems designs and equipment in international markets.

 

Sales of broadband communications equipment into international markets are an important part of our business. Our products are marketed and made available to existing and new potential international customers. In addition, United States broadband system designs and equipment are increasingly being employed in international markets, where market penetration is relatively lower than in the United States. While international operations are expected to comprise an integral part of our future business, international markets may no longer continue to develop at the current rate, or at all. We may fail to receive additional contracts to supply equipment in these markets.

 

Our international operations may be adversely affected by changes in the foreign laws in the countries in which we and our manufacturers and assemblers have plants.

 

A significant portion of our products are manufactured or assembled in China, Ireland, Mexico, and other countries outside of the United States. The governments of the foreign countries in which our products are manufactured may pass laws that impair our operations, such as laws that impose exorbitant tax obligations or nationalize these manufacturing facilities.

 

In addition, as a result of our acquisition of C-COR, we acquired a manufacturing facility located in Tijuana, Mexico. This operation is exposed to certain risks as a result of its location, including:

 

 

Any of these risks could interfere with the operation of this facility and result in reduced production, increased costs, or both. In the event that production capacity of this facility is reduced, we could fail to ship products on schedule and could face a reduction in future orders from dissatisfied customers. If our costs to operate this facility increase, our margins would decrease. Reduced shipments and margins would have an adverse effect on our financial results.

 

We face risks relating to currency fluctuations and currency exchange.

 

On an ongoing basis we are exposed to various changes in foreign currency rates because significant sales are denominated in foreign currencies. These risk factors can impact our results of operations, cash flows and financial position. We manage these risks through regular operating and financing activities and periodically use derivative financial instruments such as foreign exchange forward and option contracts. There can be no assurance that our risk management strategies will be effective.

 

We also may encounter difficulties in converting our earnings from international operations to U.S. dollars for use in the United States. These obstacles may include problems moving funds out of the countries in which the funds were earned and difficulties in collecting accounts receivable in foreign countries where the usual accounts receivable payment cycle is longer.

 

We depend on channel partners to sell our products in certain regions and are subject to risks associated with these arrangements.

 

We utilize distributors, value-added resellers, system integrators, and manufacturers’ representatives to sell our products to certain customers and in certain geographic regions to improve our access to these customers and regions and to lower our overall cost of sales and post-sales support. Our sales through channel partners are subject to a number of risks, including:

 

 

Our profitability has been, and may continue to be, volatile, which could adversely affect the price of our stock.

 

Although we have been profitable in the last three fiscal years, prior to that we experienced significant losses and we may not be profitable, or meet the level of expectations of the investment community, in the future. This could have a material adverse impact on our stock price.

 

We may face higher costs associated with protecting our intellectual property or obtaining access necessary to intellectual property of others.

 

Our future success depends in part upon our proprietary technology, product development, technological expertise and distribution channels. We cannot predict whether we can protect our technology or whether competitors can develop similar technology independently. We have received, directly or indirectly, and may continue to receive from third parties, including some of our competitors, notices claiming that we, or our customers using our products, have infringed upon third-party patents or other proprietary rights. We are a defendant in proceedings (and other proceedings have been threatened) in which our customers were sued for patent infringement and sued us and several other suppliers for indemnification, and we may become involved in similar litigation involving these and other customers in the future. These claims, regardless of their merit, result in costly litigation, divert the time, attention and resources of our management, delay our product shipments, and, in some cases, require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements. If a claim of product infringement against us is successful and we fail to obtain a license or develop non-infringing technology, our business and operating results could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, the payment of any necessary licensing fees or indemnification costs associated with a patent infringement claim could also materially adversely affect our operating results. See “Legal Proceedings.”

 

Changes in accounting pronouncements can impact our business.

 

We prepare our financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. These principles periodically are modified by the Financial Accounting Standards Board and other governing authorities, and those changes can impact how we report our results of operations, cash flows and financial positions. For instance, the FASB recently announced that it may modify, or interpret differently, the accounting principles that govern the reporting of interest expense with respect to certain convertible indebtedness, such as the convertible notes that we have outstanding. The potential consequence of this will be an increase in our interest expense and a possible restatement of interest expense for prior periods. These changes could be significant.

 

We do not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

 

Although from time to time we may consider repurchasing shares of our common stock, we do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. In addition, the payment of dividends in certain circumstances may be prohibited by the terms of our current and future indebtedness.

We have anti-takeover defenses that could delay or prevent an acquisition of our company.

 

We have a shareholder rights plan (commonly known as a “poison pill”). This plan is not intended to prevent a takeover, but is intended to protect and maximize the value of stockholders’ interests. This plan could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us or may delay that process.

 

We have the ability to issue preferred shares without stockholder approval.

 

Our common shares may be subordinate to classes of preferred shares issued in the future in the payment of dividends and other distributions made with respect to common shares, including distributions upon liquidation or dissolution. Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation permits our board of directors to issue preferred shares without first obtaining stockholder approval. If we issued preferred shares, these additional securities may have dividend or liquidation preferences senior to the common shares. If we issue convertible preferred shares, a subsequent conversion may dilute the current common stockholders’ interest.

 

 

As of December 31, 2007, there were no unresolved comments.

 

 

We currently conduct our operations from 21 different locations; three of which we own, while the remaining 18 are leased. These facilities consist of sales and administrative offices and warehouses totaling approximately one million square feet. Our long-term leases expire at various dates through 2023. We believe that our current properties are adequate for our operations.

 

A summary of our principal leased properties that are currently in use is as follows:

 

 

We own the following properties:

 

 

 

Segment:

 

 

All All segments

 

 

From time to time, ARRIS is involved in claims, disputes, litigation or legal proceedings incident to the ordinary course of its business, such as employment matters, environmental proceedings, contractual disputes and intellectual property disputes. Except as described below, ARRIS is not party to any proceedings that are, or reasonably could be expected to be, material to its business, results of operations or financial condition.

 

Currently, ARRIS is a party in two related proceedings pending in federal court in Texas and California. ARRIS has sought to clarify its intellectual property rights to the following four United States Patents: No. Re 35,774 (revised no. 5,347,304); No. 5,586,121; No. 5,818, 845; and No. 5,828,655 (the “Patents”). In both suits, ARRIS is seeking that the court declare that it has a nonexclusive license to, and has the ability to gain ownership rights in, the Patents. ARRIS’ allegations are based on the provisions of a January 11, 1999, license agreement (“License Agreement”) between the Patents’ former owner, Hybrid Networks, Inc. (“HNI”), and ARRIS’ predecessor in interest, Com21, Inc. (“Com21”). The License Agreement, which bound both parties’ successors, provided Com21 with a nonexclusive license to use, and a right-of-first-refusal to purchase, the Patents. Subsequently, ARRIS purchased certain assets of Com21, including all of Com21’s IP assets for the cable modem termination systems business, which, ARRIS has now alleged, include the rights under the License Agreement. Thus, ARRIS has argued in both cases that it has succeeded to Com21’s licensing and ownership rights to the Patents under the terms of the License Agreement. A claimed successor to HNI’s interests has sued, or has made other claims against customers of ours, and these customers either have or are expected to request indemnification from us. These cases and others are summarized as follows:

 

Hybrid Patents, Inc. v. Charter Communications, Inc., Case No. 2:05-CV-436 (E.D. Tex). Charter Communications, Inc. (“Charter”) is one of ARRIS’ customers. Hybrid Patents, Inc. (“Hybrid Patents”) claims that it succeeded in interest as owner of the Patents from HNI. On September 13, 2005, Hybrid Patents sued Charter in this case for infringement of the Patents. Charter responded by bringing a third-party claim for indemnification against ARRIS and nine of Charter’s other suppliers, alleging that ARRIS and/or the other suppliers were responsible for any infringement due to products that they sold to Charter. After ARRIS answered, and filed a third-party claim against Hybrid Patents in which ARRIS asserted its rights to the Patents, Hybrid Patents brought a third-party claim for direct and contributory patent infringement against ARRIS. ARRIS denied that it is liable for any patent infringement. The Texas court held a Markman hearing during which the judge requested summary judgment briefs from the parties addressing the Patents ownership issue. After briefing by the parties, the Court denied the Company’s summary judgment motion and granted Hybrid Patents’ summary judgment motion on the issue of Patent ownership. In so doing, the Court held that Hybrid Patents has standing in the case and that the Company is not a beneficial owner of the Patents. A memorandum opinion and order from the Court explaining its holding on the Patent ownership issue is forthcoming. The Company is contemplating whether it will appeal the Court’s summary judgment decision. The Court dismissed Charter’s third-party claims against the Company without prejudice, pursuant to a stipulation between the parties. Charter’s third-party claims against the other suppliers also were dismissed. The Court also dismissed Hybrid Patents’ claims against the Company without prejudice, pursuant to a stipulation between the parties. At the conclusion of trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Charter and against Hybrid Patents, finding that the Patents were valid but not infringed. Hybrid Patents has not yet indicated whether it intends to appeal.

 

ARRIS International, Inc. v. Hybrid Patents, Inc., Hybrid Networks, Inc., HYBR Wireless Industries, Inc., London Pacific Life & Annuity Company, and Carol Wu, Trustee of the Estate of Com21, Inc., Case No. 03-54533MM, Chapter 7, Adversary Proceeding in Bankruptcy, Adv. No. 06-5098MM (Bankr. N.D. Cal.). ARRIS brought this claim after learning that its customer, Charter, was being sued for infringement of the Patents in Texas, but before being joined as a party in the Texas litigation. In this suit, ARRIS seeks that the bankruptcy court declare that Com21 passed all of its rights under the License Agreement to its successor in interest, ARRIS, and that ARRIS thus has a nonexclusive license to, and ownership rights in, the Patents. This case has been stayed by the bankruptcy court, although a motion is pending to approve a stipulation asking the court to amend its sale order and recognize that Com21 transferred all of its rights to the Company.

Hybrid Patents, Inc. v. Comcast, Time Warner Cable and Cox, Case No. 2:06-CV-292 (E.D. Tex). The named defendants are ARRIS’ customers. As in Hybrid Patents v. Charter described above, Hybrid Patents claims that it succeeded in interest as owner of the Patents from HNI and is suing the defendants for patent infringement. The defendants have made indemnification requests and requests to contribute to the legal costs and expenses of the litigation. It is premature to assess the likelihood of a favorable outcome. In the event of an adverse outcome, ARRIS and other similarly situated suppliers of DOCSIS^® compliant products could be required to indemnify its customers, pay royalties, and/or cease using certain technology. Also, an adverse outcome may require a change in the DOCSIS^® standards to avoid using the patented technology.

 

Commencing in 2005, Rembrandt Technologies, LP filed a series of at least seven lawsuits in the Federal Court for the Eastern District of Texas against Charter Communications, Inc, Time Warner Cable, Inc., Comcast Corporation and others alleging patent infringement related to the cable systems operators’ use of data transmission, video, cable modem, voice-over-internet, and other technologies and applications. Although ARRIS is not a defendant in any of these lawsuits, its customers are, and its customers either have requested indemnification from, or are expected to request indemnification from, ARRIS and the other manufacturers of the equipment that is alleged to infringe. ARRIS is party to a joint defense agreement with respect to one of the lawsuits and has various understandings with the defendants in the remaining lawsuits with respect to cost sharing. In June 2007, the Judicial Panel of multi district litigation issued an order centralizing the litigation for administrative purposes in the District Court for Delaware. In November 2007 ARRIS, Cisco and Motorola and other suppliers filed a declaratory judgment action in the District Court of Delaware seeking to have the court declare the patents invalid and not infringed. It is premature to assess the likelihood of a favorable outcome. In the event of an adverse outcome, ARRIS could be required to indemnify its customers, pay royalties, and/or cease using certain technology. Also, an adverse outcome may require a change in the DOCSIS^® standards to avoid using the patented technology.

 

On February 2, 2007, GPNE Corp. (“GPNE”) filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Time Warner Inc., Comcast and Charter, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. In its suit, GPNE alleges that certain DOCSIS^® standard products and services sold or used by the defendants infringe a GPNE patent. These suits were dismissed without prejudice. To date ARRIS has not been named a defendant, nor has ARRIS received a formal request for formal indemnification. However, we believe it is likely that the claims will be reasserted and that the defendants will make indemnification requests, as well as a request to contribute to the legal costs and expenses of the litigation. ARRIS, Cisco and Thomson filed a Declaratory Judgment action in the District Court of Delaware seeking to have the court declare the patents not infringed. It is premature to assess the likelihood of a favorable outcome. In the event of an adverse outcome, ARRIS and other similarly situated suppliers of DOCSIS^® compliant products could be required to indemnify its customers, pay royalties, and/or cease using certain technology. Also, an adverse outcome may require a change in the DOCSIS^® standards to avoid using the patented technology.

 

In connection with the Company’s acquisition of C-COR, Inc., the Company on October 31, 2007, was named as the defendant in a suit entitled CIBC World Market Corp. vs. ARRIS Group, Inc., Action No. 603605/2007, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County. In the suit CIBC asserts that it is entitled to a $4.0 million fee plus expenses (“fee”) at the closing of the proposed acquisition. The Company does not believe that any fee is due to CIBC in connection with this acquisition. The Company’s position is that its June 1, 2005, engagement with CIBC, pursuant to which CIBC asserts its claim, was terminated and that no fee is due under the engagement. Independent of that termination, CIBC was conflicted from representing the Company in the transaction, provided no services to the Company in connection with the transaction, and otherwise is estopped from asserting that it is entitled to a fee. The Company intends to contest the entitlement to a fee asserted by CIBC vigorously.

 

In 2007, the Company received correspondence from attorneys for the Adelphia Recovery Trust (“Trust”), that the Company may have received transfers from Adelphia Cablevision, LLC (“Cablevision”), one of the Adelphia debtors, during the year prior to its filing of a Chapter 11 petition on June 25, 2002 (the “Petition Date”). The correspondence further asserts that information obtained during the course of the Adelphia Chapter 11 proceedings indicates that Cablevision was insolvent during the year prior to the Petition Date, and, accordingly, the Trust intends to assert that the payments made to the Company were fraudulent transfers under section 548 (a) of the Bankruptcy Code that may be recovered for the benefit of Cablevision’s bankruptcy estate pursuant to section 550 of the Bankruptcy Code. Prior to its acquisition by ARRIS, C-COR received a similar correspondence making the

same claims. It is anticipated that should any claims be made against ARRIS based on C-COR’s prior actions, ARRIS will defend in the same fashion as ARRIS will defend any suit against ARRIS.

 

To date, no suit has been commenced by the Trust and the Company has requested documents supporting the Trust’s position that have not yet been provided. In the event suit is commenced, the Company intends to contest the case vigorously; however, it cannot be sure that it would be successful in its defense. The Company understands that similar letters were received by other Adelphia suppliers and the Company may seek to enter into a joint defense agreement to share legal expenses if a suit is commenced. No estimate can be made of the possible range of loss, if any, associated with a resolution of these assertions.

 

In January and February 2008, Verizon Services Corp. filed separate lawsuits in the District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging infringement of eight different patents. ARRIS anticipates that it will be asked to indemnify the respective defendants. ARRIS, various MSOs and suppliers have begun to consider the cases. It is premature to assess the likelihood of a favorable outcome. In the event of an unfavorable outcome, ARRIS may be required to indemnify the defendants, pay royalties and/or cease utilizing certain technology.

 

As a result of the Company’s recent acquisition of C-COR Incorporated, ARRIS is now involved in the following patent infringement cases.

 

In June 2007, USA Video Technology Corp. brought a suit in the U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of Texas against Time Warner Cable, Cox, Charter and Comcast (Civil Action 2:06-CV-239) alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,130.792. One or more of the defendants asked C-COR and other suppliers to participate in the defense under the indemnification provisions of their respective purchase agreements. On December 10, 2007, the District Court granted Defendants’ Summary judgment motion. USA Video has filed notice of appeal.

 

Acacia Media Technologies Corp. has sued Charter and Time Warner Cable, Inc. for allegedly infringing U.S. Patent Nos. 5,132,992; 5,253,275; 5,550,863; and 6,144,702. Both customers requested C-COR’s, as well as other vendors, support under the indemnity provisions of the purchase agreements (related to video-on-demand products). We are reviewing the patents and analyzing the extent to which these patents may relate to our products. It is premature to assess the likelihood of a favorable outcome. In the event of an unfavorable outcome, ARRIS may be required to indemnify the defendants, pay royalties and /or cease using certain technology.

 

An unfavorable outcome to any of the above described proceedings could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business financial condition and results of operations.

 

 

A special meeting of shareholders was held on December 14, 2007, to consider the issuance of common stock in the acquisition of C-COR. Of the shares voted, 82,618,698 votes were cast for approval, 1,932,573 votes were cast against approval, and 39,332 votes abstained.

 

Executive Officers of the Company

 

The following table sets forth the name, age as of February 29, 2008, and position of our executive officers.

 

 

Robert J. Stanzione has been Chief Executive Officer since 2000. From 1998 through 1999, Mr. Stanzione was President and Chief Operating Officer of ARRIS. Mr. Stanzione has been a director of ARRIS since 1998 and has been the Chairman of the Board of Directors since 2003. From 1995 to 1997, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of Arris Interactive L.L.C. From 1969 to 1995, he held various positions with AT&T Corporation. Mr. Stanzione has served as a director of Symmetricon, Inc. since 2005. Mr. Stanzione also serves on the boards of the National Cable Telecommunications Association and the Georgia Cystic Fibrosis Foundation.

 

Lawrence A. Margolis has been Executive Vice President, Strategic Planning, Administration, and Chief Counsel since 2004 and has served as the Secretary of ARRIS since 1992. Mr. Margolis was the Chief Financial Officer from 1992 to 2004. Prior to joining ARRIS, Mr. Margolis was Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Anixter, Inc., a global communications products distribution company, from 1986 to 1992 and General Counsel and Secretary of Anixter from 1984 to 1986. Prior to 1984, he was a partner at the law firm of Schiff Hardin & Waite.

 

David B. Potts has been the Chief Financial Officer since 2004, and has been Chief Information Officer since the acquisition of Arris Interactive L.L.C. in August 2001. Prior to being named Chief Financial Officer in 2004, Mr. Potts was the Senior Vice President of Finance. Before joining ARRIS, he was Chief Financial Officer of Arris Interactive L.L.C. from 1995 to 2001. From 1984 to 1995, Mr. Potts held various executive management positions with Nortel Networks including Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Bell Northern Research in Ottawa and Vice President of Mergers and Acquisitions in Toronto. Prior to Nortel Networks, Mr. Potts was with Touche Ross in Toronto. Mr. Potts is a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Canada.

 

John O. Caezza was appointed President of ARRIS Access, Transport and Supplies in December 2007. He previously had held the position of President of C-COR’s Access and Transport business unit. He is responsible for the Company’s product development, production, and technical support across its Access, Transport and Supplies group. Prior to joining C-COR in 2001, Mr. Caezza was Vice President and General Manager of the Broadband Communications Division of ADC Telecommunications, Inc., with primary responsibilities for strategic product creation and promotion. Mr. Caezza also has had extensive management experience with Philips Broadband Networks, Inc., including the position of Vice President of Engineering and Associate Director of International Sales.

 

Ronald M. Coppock has been President of ARRIS Worldwide Sales since 2003. Prior to his current role, Mr. Coppock was President of International Sales since 1997 and was formerly Vice President International Sales and Marketing for TSX Corporation. Mr. Coppock has been in the cable television and satellite communications industry for over 20 years, having held senior management positions with Scientific-Atlanta, Pioneer

Communications and Oak Communications. Mr. Coppock is an active member of the American Marketing Association, Kappa Alpha Order, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Board, and the Auburn University Alumni Action Committee.

 

Bryant K. Isaacs was appointed President, Media & Communications Systems in December 2007 and was President of ARRIS New Business Ventures since 2002. Prior to his role as President, ARRIS New Business Ventures, he was President of ARRIS Network Technologies since 2000. Prior to joining ARRIS, he was Founder and General Manager of Lucent Technologies’ Wireless Communications Networking Division in Atlanta from 1997 to 2000. From 1995 through 1997, Mr. Isaacs held the position of Vice President of Digital Network Systems for General Instrument Corporation where he was responsible for developing international business strategies and products for digital video broadcasting systems.

 

James D. Lakin was appointed President, Advanced Technology and Services in 2007. Prior to his current role he was President of ARRIS Broadband since the acquisition of Arris Interactive L.L.C. in 2001. From 2000 to August 2001, he was President and Chief Operating Officer of Arris Interactive L.L.C. From 1995 to 2000, Mr. Lakin was Chief Marketing Officer of Arris Interactive L.L.C. Prior to 1995, he held various executive positions with Compression Labs, Inc. and its successor General Instrument Corporation.

 

Bruce W. McClelland was appointed President Broadband Communications Systems in December 2007 and most recently had been Vice President & General manager of the ARRIS Customer Premises Business Unit with responsibility for the development of a broad range of voice and data products. Prior to joining ARRIS in 1999 as Vice President of Engineering, he had eleven years of experience with Nortel Networks where he was responsible for development efforts on Nortel Networks’ Signaling System 7 and the Class 4/5 DMS switching product line.

 

Marc S. Geraci has been Vice President, Treasurer of ARRIS since 2003 and has been with ARRIS since 1994. He began with ARRIS as Controller for the International Sales Group and in 1997 was named Chief Financial Officer of that group. Prior to joining ARRIS, he was a broker/dealer on the Pacific Stock Exchange in San Francisco for eleven years and, prior to that, in public accounting in Chicago for four years. Mr. Geraci is a CPA.

 

Board Committees

 

Our Board of Directors has three permanent committees: Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance. The charters for all three committees are located on our website at www.arrisi.com. The Board believes that each of its members, with the exception of Mr. Stanzione, is independent, as defined by the SEC and NASDAQ rules. The Board has identified John Petty as the lead independent director and audit committee financial expert, as defined by the SEC. Additionally, the Board has identified Matthew Kearney as an audit committee financial expert.

 

 

ARRIS’ common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “ARRS.” The following table reports the high and low trading prices per share of the Company’s common stock as listed on the NASDAQ Global Market System:

 

 

We have not paid cash dividends on our common stock since our inception. On October 3, 2002, to implement our shareholder rights plan, our board of directors declared a dividend consisting of one right for each share of our common stock outstanding at the close of business on October 25, 2002. Each right represents the right to purchase one one-thousandth of a share of our Series A Participating Preferred Stock and becomes exercisable only if a person or group acquires beneficial ownership of 15% or more of our common stock or announces a tender or exchange offer for 15% or more of our common stock or under other similar circumstances.

 

As of January 31, 2008, there were approximately 463 record holders of our common stock. This number excludes shareholders holding stock under nominee or street name accounts with brokers or banks.

 

Below is a graph comparing total stockholder return on the Company’s stock from December 31, 2002 through December 31, 2007, with the Standard & Poor’s 500 and the Index of NASDAQ U.S. Stocks of entities in the industry of electronics and electrical equipment and components, exclusive of computer equipment (SIC 3600-3699), prepared by the Research Data Group, Inc.

 

 

 

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that might incorporate future filings, including this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in whole or in part, the Performance Graph presented below shall not be incorporated by reference into any such filings.

 

The selected consolidated financial data as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 set forth below are derived from the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements of ARRIS, and should be read in conjunction with such statements and related notes thereto. The selected consolidated financial data as of December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 and for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 is derived from audited consolidated financial statements that have not been included in this filing. The historical consolidated financial information is not necessarily indicative of the results of future operations and should be read in conjunction with ARRIS’ historical consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this document. See Note 18 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a summary of our quarterly consolidated financial information for 2007 and 2006 (in thousands, except per share data).

 

 

 

Overview

 

In recent years, the technology used in cable systems has evolved significantly. Historically, cable systems offered only one-way analog video service. Due to technological advancements, these systems have evolved to become two-way broadband systems delivering high-volume, high-speed, interactive services. MSOs have over the years aggressively upgraded their networks to cost-effectively support and deliver enhanced voice, video and data services. As a result, cable operators have been able to use broadband systems to increase their revenues by offering enhanced interactive subscriber services, such as high-speed data, telephony, digital video and video on demand, and to effectively compete against other broadband communications technologies, such as DSL, local multiport distribution service, DBS, FTTH, and fixed wireless. Delivery of enhanced services also has helped MSOs offset slowing basic video subscriber growth, reduce their subscriber churn and compete against alternative video providers, in particular, DBS.

 

A key factor supporting the growth of broadband systems is the powerful growth of the Internet. Rapid growth in the number of Internet users, their desire for ever higher Internet access speeds, and more high-volume interactive services with growing customer control features have created demand for our products. Another key factor supporting the growth of broadband systems is the evolution of video services being offered to consumers. Video on demand, high definition television and switched digital video are three key video services expanding the use of MSOs’ broadband systems. The increase in volume and complexity of the signals transmitted through the network and emerging competitive pressures from telephone companies with digital subscriber line and fiber to the premises offerings are pushing cable operators to deploy new technologies as they evolve. Further, cable operators are looking for products and technologies that are flexible, cost effective, easily deployable and scalable to meet future demand. Because the technologies are evolving and the services delivered are growing in complexity and volume, cable operators need equipment that provides the necessary technical capability at a reasonable cost at the time of initial deployment and the flexibility later to accommodate technological advances and network expansion.

 

Over the past decade, United States cable operators have spent over $100 billion to upgrade their networks to deliver digital video and two-way services such as high-speed data, video on demand, and telephony. As global cable operators maximize their investment in their networks, we believe that our business will be driven by the industry dynamics and trends outlined below.

Industry Conditions

 

As global cable operators maximize their investment in their networks, we believe that our business will be impacted by the following industry dynamics and trends:

 

Competition Between Cable Operators and Telephone Companies is Increasing

 

Telephone companies are aggressively offering high-speed data services and are making progress in offering video services to the residential market. AT&T Inc. and Verizon Communications have stated publicly that they will spend billions of dollars to equip their networks to offer video service, once a service offered only by cable and satellite providers. Likewise, telephone companies have been increasingly competitive on pricing for higher speed data services, again to compete with the cable companies. Counter balancing this, cable companies are providing Internet Protocol-based telephone service, with Comcast now being the fourth largest telephone company in the U.S. Independent communications providers of multiple services are challenging both cable and telephone companies by using their infrastructures to offer those services at lower prices.

 

Competition Between U.S. Cable Operators and Direct Broadcast Satellite Services is Increasing

 

U.S. Direct Broadcast Satellite Services are aggressively offering many high definitions televisions channels (HDTV). DIRECTV and The Dish Network have stated publicly that they will deploy up to 150 HDTV channels including many local channels by the end of 2008. U.S. cable operators are responding by reclaiming spectrum through advanced technologies such as switched digital video and upgrading their networks to 1GHz to make more spectrum available for additional HDTV channels.

 

Personalized Programming is Becoming More Readily Available and Across Multiple Platforms

 

Increased demand for bandwidth capacity of cable systems is developing as content providers (Google, Yahoo, YouTube, ABC, CBS, NBC, movie and music studios, and gaming vendors) are offering personalized content across multiple venues. For example, broadcast network shows and user-generated (UG) content, such as video downloads, personalized web pages, and video and photo sharing, have become commonplace on the Internet. Likewise, certain cable operators are experimenting with offering more content through the use of network personal video recorders (nPVRs) which, once copyright issues are resolved, will add more traffic to the networks. Another bandwidth intensive service being offered by a major cable operator allows cable video subscribers to re-start programs on demand if they miss the beginning of a television show (time-shifted television). Television today has thus become more interactive and personal, further increasing the demands on the network. Further, the Internet has set the bar on personalization with viewers increasingly looking for “similar” experiences across screens — television, PC and phone, further increasing the challenges in delivering broadband content.

 

Growth in Enhanced Broadband Services Requires Continued Upgrades and maintenance by Domestic and International Cable Operators

 

Cable operators are offering enhanced broadband services, including high definition television, digital video, interactive and on demand video services, high speed Internet and voice over Internet Protocol. As these enhanced broadband services continue to attract new subscribers, we expect that cable operators will be required to invest in their networks to expand network capacity and support increased customer demand for personalized services. In the access portion, or “last-mile,” of the network, operators will need to upgrade headends, hubs, nodes, and radio frequency distribution equipment. While many domestic cable operators have substantially completed initial network upgrades necessary to provide enhanced broadband services, they will need to take a scalable approach to continue upgrades as new services are deployed. In addition, many international cable operators have not yet completed the initial upgrades necessary to offer such enhanced broadband services. Finally, as more and more critical services are provided over the MSO network plant maintenance becomes a more important requirement. Operators must replace network components (such as a amplifiers and lasers) as they approach the end of their useful lives.

Growing Demand for Bundled Services — Video, Voice, and Data

 

In response to increased competition from telecommunication service providers and direct broadcast satellite operators, cable operators have not only upgraded their networks to cost effectively support and deliver enhanced video, voice, and data, but continue to invest significantly to offer a “triple play” bundle of these services. The ability to cost effectively provide personalized, bundled services helps cable operators reduce subscriber turnover and increase revenue per subscriber. As a result, the focus on such services is driving cable operators to continue to invest in network infrastructure, content management, digital advertising insertion, and back office automation tools.

 

Cable Operators are Demanding Advanced Network Technologies and Software Solutions

 

The increase in volume and complexity of the signals transmitted over broadband networks as a result of the migration to an all digital, on demand network (Federal mandate for completion by February 2009 in the U.S.) is causing cable operators to deploy new technologies. For example, transport technologies based on Internet Protocol allow cable operators to more cost effectively deliver video, voice, and data across a common network infrastructure. Cable operators also are demanding sophisticated network and service management software applications that minimize operating expenditures needed to support the complexity of two-way broadband communications systems. As a result, cable operators are focusing on technologies and products that are flexible, cost effective, compliant with open industry standards, and scalable to meet subscriber growth and effectively deliver reliable, enhanced services.

 

Digital Video Recorders are Impacting Advertising Business

 

As the use of digital video recorders and other recording devices becomes more prevalent, advertisers face the need to develop new business models. Since personal recorders allow the viewer to skip over ads, network operators are looking for new ways to attract advertising dollars and deliver a meaningful ad experience to viewers. As a result, many network operators are implementing digital ad insertion, allowing them to transition from all analog to a mix of analog and digital and ultimately to all digital. One benefit is the ability to reallocate bandwidth. More importantly, digital advertising allows network operators to create a more dynamic and interactive experience between advertiser and viewer. Telephone companies are also planning for this transition.

 

Cable Operators are Developing Strategies to Offer Business Services

 

Cable operators are leveraging their investment in existing fiber and coax networks by expanding beyond traditional residential customers to offer voice, video, and data services to commercial (small and medium size businesses), education, healthcare, and government clients. Using their experience in delivering data, cable operators can bundle both voice and data for commercial subscribers and effectively compete with the telephone companies who have typically focused on large enterprises. Business services are just one of several market segments where cable and telephone companies are trying to penetrate each others’ markets.

 

Volatile Capital Market Conditions for Many Large Cable Operators

 

In recent years, the telecommunications equipment industry has been impacted by several financial challenges, including bankruptcies. Many of our domestic and international customers accumulated significant levels of debt during the earlier part of this decade and have since undertaken reorganizations and financial restructurings to streamline their balance sheets. Further, the equity and debt markets and general economic climate in the U.S. have been turbulent in 2007 and early 2008 and are expected to be so which may affect our customers spending patterns. It is also possible that continuing industry restructuring and consolidation will take place via mergers and or spin-offs. For example, in 2006 various Adelphia Communications properties were acquired by Comcast and Time-Warner Cable, two of the largest U.S. cable MSOs. Also in 2004, Cox Communications chose to go private. Regulatory issues, financial concerns, capital markets and business combinations among our customers are likely to significantly impact the overall industry capital spending plans potentially impacting our business. In addition, during the past 12 months many MSO’s have experienced a significant decline in the value of their stocks. This in turn may lead to MSO’s investing less in their networks for the foreseeable future.

Consolidation of vendors has occurred and may continue

 

In February 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. acquired Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Both Cisco and Scientific-Atlanta are key competitors of ARRIS. In February 2007 Ericsson purchased Tandberg Television. In July 2007 Motorola acquired Terayon Communication Systems. In December 2007 ARRIS acquired CCOR. It also is possible that other competitor consolidations may occur that could have an impact on future sales and profitability.

 

Our Strategy and Key Highlights

 

Our long-term business strategy includes the following key elements:

 

 

Our mission is to simplify technology, facilitate its implementation, and enable operators to put their subscribers in control of their entertainment, information, and communication needs. Through a set of business solutions that respond to specific market needs, we are integrating our products, software, and services solutions to work with our customers as they address Internet Protocol telephony deployment, high speed data deployment, network capacity issues, on demand video rollout, operations management, network integration, and business services opportunities.

 

Below are some key highlights and trends relative to our strategy:

 

“Everything IP, Everywhere” is taking hold as MSOs globally have embraced VoIP and are now rapidly deploying this key new service.

 

 

 

We continue to invest significantly in research and development.

 

 

 

 

In November 2006, we issued Convertible Notes to supplement our cash position in anticipation of potential future acquisitions.

 

 

We continue to expand through partnerships and acquisitions.

 

 

Results of Operations

 

Overview

 

As highlighted earlier, we have faced, and in the future will face, significant changes in our industry and business. These changes have impacted our results of operations and are expected to do so in the future. As a result, we have implemented strategies both in anticipation and in reaction to the impact of these dynamics. These strategies were outlined in the Overview to the MD&A.

Below is a table that shows our key operating data as a percentage of sales. Following the table is a detailed description of the major factors impacting the year-over-year changes of the key lines of our results of operations.

 

Key Operating Data (as a percentage of net sales)

 

 

Comparison of Operations for the Three Years Ended December 31, 2007

 

Net Sales

 

The table below sets forth our net sales for the three years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, for each of our business segments described in Item 1 of this Form 10-K (in millions except percentages):

 

The table below sets forth our domestic and international sales for the three years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 (in millions, except percentages):

 

 

Broadband Communications Systems Net Sales 2007 vs. 2006

 

During the year ended December 31, 2007, sales of our BCS segment increased $92.7 million or approximately 12.1%, as compared to 2006. This increase in BCS sales resulted from several components:

 

 

Access, Transport and Supplies Net Sales 2007 vs. 2006

 

During the year ended December 31, 2007, Access, Transport and Supplies segment sales increased $7.0 million or approximately 5.7%, as compared to the same period in 2006.

 

 

Media & Communications Systems Net Sales 2007 vs. 2006

 

During the year ended December 31, 2007, Media & Communications Systems segment sales increased $0.9 million or approximately 60.0%, as compared to the same period in 2006.

 

Broadband Communications Systems Net Sales 2006 vs. 2005

 

During the year ended December 31, 2006, sales of our BCS segment increased $205.5 million or approximately 36.6%, as compared to 2005. This increase in BCS segment sales resulted from several components:

 

 

Access, Transport and Supplies Net Sales 2006 vs. 2005

 

During the year ended December 31, 2006, ATS segment sales increased $5.5 million or approximately 4.7%, as compared to the same period in 2005.

 

 

Media & Communications Systems Net Sales 2006 vs. 2005

 

During the year ended December 31, 2006, MCS segment sales increased $0.2 million or approximately 15.4%, as compared to the same period in 2005.

 

 

Gross Margin

 

The table below sets forth our gross margin for the three years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, for each of our business segments (in millions, except percentages):

 

The table below sets forth our gross margin percentages for the three years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, for each of our business segments:

 

 

Our overall gross margins are dependent upon, among other factors, achievement of cost reductions, product mix, product introduction costs, and price reductions granted to customers.

 

Broadband Communications Systems Gross Margin 2007 vs. 2006

 

The increase in BCS segment gross margin dollars and the decrease in gross margin percentage in 2007 as compared to 2006 were related to the following factors:

 

 

Access, Transport and Supplies Gross Margin 2007 vs. 2006

 

The increase in ATS segment gross margin dollars year-over-year was the result of the $7.0 million increase in sales. The gross margin percentage did not materially differ year-over-year.

 

Media & Communications Systems Gross Margin 2007 vs. 2006

 

 

Broadband Communications Systems Gross Margin 2006 vs. 2005

 

The increase in BCS segment gross margin dollars and the decrease in gross margin percentage in 2006 as compared to 2005 were related to the following factors:

 

 

Access, Transport and Supplies Gross Margin 2006 vs. 2005

 

The increase in ATS segment gross margin dollars year-over-year was the result of the $5.5 million increase in sales. The gross margin percentage did not materially differ year-over-year.

 

Media & Communications Systems Gross Margin 2006 vs. 2005

 

 

Operating Expenses

 

The table below provides detail regarding our operating expenses (in millions, except percentages):

 

 

Selling, General, and Administrative, or SG&A, Expenses

 

2007 vs. 2006

 

Several factors contributed to the $12.7 million increase year-over-year:

 

 

2006 vs. 2005

 

Several factors contributed to the $12.8 million increase year-over-year:

 

 

 

Research & Development, or R&D, Expenses

 

Included in our R&D expenses are costs directly associated with our development efforts (people, facilities, materials, etc.) and reasonable allocations of our information technology and facility costs.

 

2007 vs. 2006

 

Several factors contributed to the $5.1 million increase year-over-year:

 

 

2006 vs. 2005

 

Several factors contributed to the $6.0 million increase year-over-year:

 

 

Acquired In-Process Research and Development Charge

 

During 2007 we recorded a $6.1 million expense for acquired in-process R&D related to the C-COR acquisition.

 

Restructuring and Impairment Charges

 

During 2007, 2006 and 2005, we recorded restructuring and impairment charges of $0.5 million, $2.2 million and $1.3 million, respectively, which predominately relate to changes in estimates related to real estate leases associated with the previous consolidation of certain facilities. The adjustment recorded in 2006 relates primarily to a vacant property in Georgia. This lease has approximately two years remaining. Given the limited time left on the lease and the information we have gained through our advisors and continued marketing efforts, we concluded we will be unsuccessful in subletting the facility.