DATATRAK International, Inc. 10-K
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 000-20699
DATATRAK International, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
34-1685364 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
identification no.) |
|
|
|
6150 Parkland Boulevard, Mayfield Hts., Ohio
|
|
44124 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (440) 443-0082
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Exchange on Which
Registered |
|
|
|
Common Shares, without par value
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock Purchase Rights
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC |
|
|
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule
405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section
13 or 15(d) the Act. Yeso No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation
S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 12b-2). Yes o No þ
As of June 30, 2006, the aggregate market value of the 9,869,719 common shares then
outstanding, which together constituted all of the voting shares of the registrant, held by
non-affiliates was $70,963,229 (based upon the
closing price of $7.19 per common share on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market on June 30, 2006). For
purposes of this calculation, the registrant deems the common shares held by all of its Directors
and executive officers to be the common shares held by affiliates. As of February 28, 2007, the
registrant had 11,576,115 common shares, without par value, issued and outstanding.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the registrants definitive Proxy Statement to be used in connection with its
Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on June 14, 2007 are incorporated by reference into Part
III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) of this report.
Except as otherwise stated, the information contained in this Form 10-K is as of December 31, 2006.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Recent Developments
On March 16, 2007, we agreed to the terms of a private placement financing with a group of
institutional investors. In connection with this financing, which is currently expected to close
early next week, we will sell 1,986,322 common shares at a price of $4.75 per share. The terms of
this financing include the issuance of five-year warrants to purchase a total of 297,948 common
shares at $6.00 per share to investors in the private placement, and the issuance of five-year
warrants to purchase a total of 29,795 common shares at $6.00 per common share to the placement
agents who assisted the Company in the private placement. The net proceeds from the sale of
the common shares is expected to be approximately $8,797,000 (after deducting the commissions and
certain expenses of the placement agents). We expect to use the proceeds of the private placement
to fund working capital needs, expand the companys sales and marketing efforts and to pay debt
obligations as they mature. In connection with the agreement executed by the parties, we will
grant registration rights for the purchased common shares and the common shares issuable upon
exercise of the warrants. Closing of the private placement is dependent upon the satisfaction of
customary terms and conditions.
General
We are a technology and services company focused on providing a platform of software
applications to the global clinical trials industry. Our customers use our software to collect,
review, transmit and store clinical trial data electronically. The existence of a multicomponent
suite of applications in this industry is commonly referred to as an eClinical offering. Our
customers are companies in the clinical pharmaceutical, biotechnology, contract research
organization (CRO), and medical device industries. Our services assist these companies in
accelerating the completion of clinical trials more efficiently and safely by providing improved
data quality and real time access to information on a global scale.
We currently operate in one business segment as an Application Service Provider (ASP)
providing electronic clinical trials technology often referred to as
electronic data capture (EDC)
to the clinical trials industry. Since we began our current operations in 1997, we have devoted
the majority of our efforts to developing and improving our platform offerings and establishing the
market presence necessary to compete in this evolving sector. DATATRAKs mission is to provide
clinical research data to sponsors of clinical trials faster and more efficiently than other forms
of information-processing.
At this time, the Company has two distinct software offerings. The first offering is a
legacy-based point solution known as DATATRAK EDC®. This software product has provided electronic
solutions for the global clinical trials industry since 1993. It was acquired by DATATRAK in
January of 1998 from the German Division of Electronic Data Systems. This product served as the
primary offering of the Company from 1998 through February 13, 2006. This legacy-based product will
be providing electronic data collection services until ongoing clinical trials that it services
come to completion at the end of 2009.
On February 13, 2006, the Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of ClickFind, Inc.
(ClickFind), a company focused on the application of a unified technology platform for clinical
trials, located in Bryan, Texas, for a total negotiated aggregate purchase price of $18,000,000,
less approximately $328,000 in certain transaction expenses and certain indebtedness of ClickFind.
A component of the purchase price was paid with our common shares, priced at $9.25 per share, as
determined by the terms of the acquisition agreement. The acquisition was recorded as a purchase,
and as such, for the purpose of recording the acquisition, the value of the common shares used in
the acquisition were valued at $7.66 per share, based on the average closing price per share of our
common shares for the five business day period from February 9 through February 15, 2006.
1
Based on the common share valuation of $7.66 per share, the total recorded acquisition cost
including acquisition related expenses of $796,000 was $16,619,000. The cash portion of the
purchase price, less cash acquired of $87,000 was approximately $4,669,000. The remainder of the
purchase price consisted of $4,000,000 in notes payable and the issuance of approximately
$7,863,000 in common shares (1,026,522 common shares). The acquired product suite is now known as
DATATRAK eClinical. This acquisition was made in order to appropriately react to market
maturations that are transitioning from point solution offerings to overall suites of capabilities
encompassed in a broader information platform. The Company believed that their competitiveness in
this market could be enhanced more quickly and cost effectively through an acquisition rather than
internal development. This rationale was also supported by opportunity considerations in being able
to take advantage of early transitions in this market as customers begin to select their platforms
of choice for the next several years. As a result of the acquisition, we believe we have the most
extensive software suite in the clinical trials industry.
All clinical trials currently being performed with DATATRAK EDC® will continue through
conclusion with that product suite. At this time, it is anticipated that the DATATRAK EDC®
platform will be utilized in these, and perhaps some new, clinical trials until the end of 2009.
As such, we will provide two different architectures for the use of technology in clinical trials
until current trials, and perhaps future trials, using the previous platform are completed. We
will continue to support and provide, as needed, appropriate service packs for the maintenance of
DATATRAK EDC®. However, no extensive, future development efforts are planned for DATATRAK EDC®,
and following the conclusion of all clinical trials using DATATRAK EDC®, that product suite will be
discontinued. DATATRAK will focus its future development efforts on the continuous enhancement of
its core product platform the DATATRAK eClinicalTM software suite.
Overview of the Clinical Research Industry
Our customers are companies that perform clinical trials in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology,
CRO and medical device industry. This industry is driven by regulatory requirements which mandate
that new drugs and medical devices be adequately tested in clinical trials prior to marketing these
drugs and devices.
Competitive pressures are forcing the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries to become
more efficient when developing new products. To improve returns on research and development
investments, pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies are continuing to develop new products,
while at the same time attempting to shorten product development timelines. These efforts have
placed more drugs into the clinical development process and have increased the pressure for
companies to develop products faster in order to maintain growth and continue to achieve acceptable
returns on research and development expenditures. Sponsors of clinical trials have attempted to
create process efficiencies, control fixed costs and expand capacity by outsourcing clinical
research activities.
DATATRAK Software and Services
Under the traditional method of clinical research, clinical trial data from each patient is
recorded and maintained on paper in a binder, known as a case report form. A separate case report
form is maintained for each patient. Clinical research associates then visit research sites to
review the clinical trial data for accuracy and integrity. During these visits, known as
monitoring visits, the research associate must review each page of each case report form. These
visits may last several days, and corrections to the case report forms are frequently required
before the data can be delivered to the clinical trial sponsor. Several weeks, or even months, of
data may be reviewed during each monitoring visit. At the completion of a monitoring visit, the
completed case report form pages are physically transferred to a central location where the data is
then entered into a database for statistical compilation. Using this method of data collection and
quality control, the duration of the clinical trial process, from patient visit to delivery of
clean data to the clinical trial sponsor, can range from six to nine months. Such delays are
significant because errors or trends may not be detected until long after the interaction between
the patient and clinical investigator.
2
During the performance of clinical trials, a variety of technology applications are used for
the collection, management and storage of information. Many of these applications perform limited
but important functions that contribute to the overall successful accomplishment of a clinical
trial. Because the use of technology in this industry is relatively new, as compared to others,
the specific functionalities of individual technology applications have advanced as single point
solutions rather than an overall product suite, existing under a single application, architecture
and corporate offering. As the global clinical trial market transitions from a paper-based data
collection and management process to a technology-enabled process over the next several years, we
believe that the clinical trials industry will increasingly demand multiple applications. As the
demand for multiple applications increase, we believe sponsors of clinical research will gravitate
from the challenges encountered with information collected and residing in several disparate
applications to one that houses multiple applications under a single software architecture and
corporate structure. This would represent a simplified approach from the workflow process of
clinical trials itself and would also yield contracting advantages by being able to deal with only
one vendor for a variety of necessary software applications.
Our products were developed to provide clinical research data to sponsors of clinical research
trials faster and more efficiently than other forms of information-processing that utilize paper.
Automating data entry and review procedures can save time in the drug development and medical
device approval process, and possibly result in enhanced patient safety. Our system consists of
numerous modules designed for flexible adaptation to the clinical research process. We initially
provide a set of electronic data forms that can be modeled to suit the needs of each particular
clinical trial. Each form is then made available through data entry capability to each research
site participating in the clinical trial via the Internet. Once clinical trial data has been
collected and entered, the clinical trial sponsor, or other contracted vendor, can review the data
remotely via the Internet. After the data is reviewed and cleansed of all entry errors, the
softwares report capability can generate customized reports. Finally, the softwares export
feature allows completed data and reports to be transmitted directly to a clinical trial sponsors
in-house database. Under this model, research data is collected quicker and with greater accuracy
than with physical review of paper reports.
Our DATATRAK eClinicalTM software suite provides the following capabilities: EDC,
interactive voice response systems (IVRS) (via phone or internet), medical coding, web-based
randomization, clinical trial management system (CTMS), clinical data management system (CDMS),
drug inventory management, digitized electrocardiograms, image collection, viewing and storing
capabilities, electronic patient recorded outcomes (ePRO) and workgroup collaboration
capabilities. In comparison to the legacy product, DATATRAK EDC®, several of these new
capabilities will represent additional revenue opportunities for the Company as the DATATRAK
eClinicalTM product offering matures.
Our software products have successfully supported hundreds of international clinical trials
involving thousands of patients in 59 countries. DATATRAK products have been utilized in some
aspect of the clinical development of 16 separate drugs that have received regulatory approval from
either the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or counterpart European regulatory
bodies (EMEA).
Our Enterprise Transfer program will allow customers to become empowered to design, set up and
manage their clinical trials independently through our ASP delivery. The Company believes that our
customers desire to be as independent as possible in the performance of their clinical trials is
another growth aspect of this industry that is gaining momentum. Because of this anticipated
industry maturation, DATATRAK is aggressively investing in the formation of its own Enterprise
Consulting Group so as to provide knowledgeable guidance to customers who want to implement our
complete information platform within their organizations. We intend to continue to fund the
maintenance and testing of the DATATRAK EDC® software, as well as invest in the development and
enhancement of DATATRAK eClinical software suite. Research and development expenses were
$2,310,000, $1,650,000 and $1,142,000 in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
3
Customers and Marketing
Our customers are largely comprised of clinical trial sponsors and CROs. We market our
software and services through a sales and marketing staff located in the United States and Europe.
The market for the deployment of electronic clinical trials in general and for our services
specifically, has been an emerging one. Our marketing efforts have included selective
participation in scientific and medical meetings to promote our services and we have occasionally
used direct mail and journal advertisements to build awareness of our capabilities.
Our marketing and sales efforts have been focused upon building reference accounts with key
customers and leveraging these relationships into new divisions of our current customers, and
growing new customers through maintaining a high level of satisfaction in the delivery of our
DATATRAK eClinicalTM product suite on a worldwide basis.
The market for electronic clinical trials has been slow to develop. The growth of the
Internet has drastically altered business strategies and pricing models in this specific sector.
Most vendors have insignificant revenues and are classified as start-ups. Nonetheless, we believe
that some type of automation in the collection and review of clinical trial data is inevitable.
It is our belief that our software platform can be competitive in this emerging marketplace.
Our products have been tested and verified to be in compliance with FDA and other regulations.
Our software offering is delivered primarily via the Internet and supports multiple languages.
Furthermore, many clinical trial sponsors have published statistics indicating that the use of
technology can reduce the length of time to complete a clinical
trial and improve the quality of the
clinical trial data.
The extent to which we rely on revenue from one customer varies from period to period,
depending upon, among other things, our ability to generate new business, and the timing and size
of clinical trials. In light of our small revenue base, we are more dependent on major customers
than many of the larger participants in the EDC industry. The table below sets forth the
percentage of revenue generated from customers who accounted for more than 10% of our revenue
during 2006, 2005 and 2004.
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
ended December 31, |
Customer |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Sanofi-Aventis |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Otsuka Research Institute |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 10% of revenue. |
Contracts
Our contracts provide a fixed price for each component or service to be delivered, and revenue
is recognized as these components or services are delivered. We recognize revenue based on the
performance or delivery of the following specified services or components in the manner described
below:
|
|
|
Project management and data management (design, report and export) service
revenue is recognized proportionally over the life of a contract as services are
performed based on the contractual billing rate per hour for those services. |
|
|
|
|
Data items revenue is earned based on a price per data unit as data items are
entered into DATATRAKs hosting facility. |
|
|
|
|
Classroom training services revenue is recognized as classroom training is
completed, at rates based on the length of the training program. |
|
|
|
|
Internet-based training services revenue is recognized on a per user basis as
self-study courses are completed. |
|
|
|
|
Help desk revenue is recognized based on a monthly price per registered user
under the contract. |
4
Services provided by us that are in addition to those provided for in our contracts are billed
on a fee for service basis as services are completed. Costs associated with contract revenue are
recognized as incurred. Costs that are paid directly by our clients, and for which we do not bear
the risk of economic loss, are excluded from revenue. The termination of a standard contract will
not result in a material adjustment to the revenue or costs previously recognized.
Competition
We compete in this market on the strength of our softwares functionality, design architecture
and data entry and review tools, which we believe equal or exceed those available in the market.
We believe that our greatest strength is directly related to our offering of a broad information
platform that can be used throughout an organization to efficiently manage their clinical trials.
The Company is working hard to accomplish its goal of becoming the Desktop for the clinical
trials industry.
The Companys competition is paper as well as other technology solutions. The electronic
clinical trials technology market is highly competitive and fragmented. The largest competitor is
the traditional paper-based method of collecting clinical trial data. In addition, technology
applications in this and every industry are always emerging and are characterized by rapid
evolutions. At times, the Company also competes with both internal initiatives at our customers as
well as those in the CRO industry.
Our major competitors include other software vendors, clinical trial data service companies
and large pharmaceutical companies currently developing their own in-house technology. Our
software suite has a variety of unified offerings which includes: EDC, interactive voice response
systems (IVRS) (via phone or internet), medical coding, web-based randomization, clinical trial
management system (CTMS), clinical data management system (CDMS), drug inventory management,
digitized electrocardiograms, image collection, viewing and storing capabilities, electronic
patient recorded outcomes (ePRO) and workgroup collaboration capabilities. Each of these
individual offerings has distinct single point solution competitors in the clinical trial market.
Sponsors of clinical research have a variety of choices in which to satisfy each of these
capabilities for their clinical trials from many different organizations. We are not aware of any
competitors that have all of these individual components contained under one software architecture.
Many current and potential future competitors have or may have substantially greater financial
and technical resources, greater name recognition and more extensive customer bases that could be
leveraged, thereby gaining market share or product acceptance to our detriment. We may not be able
to capture or establish the market presence necessary to effectively compete in this emerging
sector of the clinical research industry. Clinical trial sponsors also may continue to contract
with individual vendors instead of utilizing our single software solution.
We are aware of other EDC systems that compete or, in the future, may compete directly with
one or more of the software product offerings included in our DATATRAK eClinicalTM software
suite. There are other companies that have developed or are in the process of developing
technologies that are, or, in the future, may be, the basis for competitive products. Some of
those technologies may have an entirely different approach or means of accomplishing the desired
effects as our product. Either existing or new competitors may also develop products that are
superior to or that otherwise achieve greater market acceptance than our software. In addition, we
believe that certain large companies in the information technology industry may be forming
alliances and attempting to capitalize on the data delivery options offered by the Internet. To
the extent that our approach to EDC may gain market acceptance, larger companies in the information
technology industry may develop competing technology to our detriment.
Regulatory Matters
The FDA has issued guidances and regulations on the use of computer systems in clinical trials
relating to standard operating procedures, data entry, system design, security, system
dependability and controls, personnel training, records inspection and certification of electronic
signatures. Based on our review, we believe that our software products comply with these guidances
and regulations. Any release of
5
FDA guidances that are significantly inconsistent with the design of our software may cause us to
incur substantial costs to remain in compliance with FDA guidances and regulations. We are
continuing to monitor the FDAs guidances to ensure compliance.
In addition to FDA guidances and regulations, we also comply with International Conference on
Harmonization (ICH) Regulations guidances for good clinical practices. These guidances have been
developed by the ICH and have been subject to consultation by regulatory parties, in accordance
with the ICH process. The regulatory bodies consist of representatives from the European Union,
Japan and the U.S.
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) applies to health
care providers, health plans and health care clearinghouses, or covered entities. Under HIPPA,
covered entities are required to protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of certain
electronic patient information they collect, maintain, use or transmit. Neither we, nor our
customers, are covered entities under HIPPA, however, we have taken steps, including encryption
techniques, to ensure the confidentiality of all electronic patient information that is captured
and transmitted through the use of our software.
Potential Liability and Insurance
Our services are supported by telecommunications equipment, software, operating protocols and
proprietary applications for high-speed transmission of large quantities of data among multiple
locations. In such operations, it is possible that data files may be lost, altered or distorted.
Our software and its future enhancements or adaptations may contain undetected design faults and
software bugs that, despite our testing, are discovered only after the system has been installed
and used by customers. Such faults or errors could cause delays or require design modifications on
our part. In addition, clinical pharmaceutical and medical device research requires the review and
handling of large amounts of patient data. Potential liability may arise from a breach of contract
or a loss of or unauthorized release of clinical trial data. Contracts with our customers are
designed to limit our liability for damages resulting from errors in the transportation and
handling of data. Nevertheless, we may still be subject to claims for data losses in the
transportation and handling of data over our information technology network.
If we were forced to undertake the defense of, or were found financially responsible for,
claims based upon the foregoing or related risks we could incur significant costs relating to these
claims, and our financial resources could be diminished. We maintain an errors and omissions
professional liability insurance policy to cover claims in an amount up to $5,000,000 that may be
brought against us. This coverage may not be adequate, and insurance may not continue to be
available to us, in the future.
Intellectual Property
Intellectual property rights are significant to our ongoing operations and future
opportunities. We have taken steps to secure patent protection for recently-developed database
technology. Our software and business processes embody numerous trade secrets which we protect
through various physical and technical security measures, as well as by agreement. Modules of our
product suite, related manuals and other written and graphical materials are subject to copyright
protection. Our DATATRAK® brand is at the heart of a family of registered trademarks and service
marks that identify and distinguish our software and services in the market. We sell our services
and license the use of our software subject to contract provisions intended to provide appropriate
protection to these valuable intellectual property assets.
Employees
As of February 28, 2007, we had approximately 122 full-time employees. None of our employees
are represented by a union, and we consider relations with our employees to be satisfactory. We
have employment agreements with all of our executive officers. Due to the early stage of
development of our industry and business, the loss of the services of any of our executive officers
could put us at a competitive disadvantage, since we would need to attract a qualified new
executive to fill the vacancy. To address these risks, we must, among other things, continue to
attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel.
6
Available Information
Our
Internet address is www.datatrak.net. Annual Reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports are accessible through
the investor relations section of our Web site as soon as reasonably practicable after we
electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC or the Commission). The information on our Web site is not, and shall not be deemed to
be, a part of this report or incorporated into any other report we file with or furnish to the SEC.
Upon the receipt of a written request from any shareholder we will mail, at no charge to the
shareholder, a copy of our Annual Report, including the financial statements and schedules required
to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 13a-1 under the Exchange Act, for our most recent
fiscal year.
(Remainder Of This Page Intentionally Left Blank)
7
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Certain statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K contain forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act). All
statements that address operating performance, events or developments that we anticipate will occur
in the future, including statements related to future revenue, profits, expenses, income, cash flow
and earnings per share or statements expressing general optimism about future results are
forward-looking statements. In addition, words such as expects, anticipates, intends,
plans, believes, estimates, variations of such words, and similar expressions are intended to
identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to the safe harbors
created in the Exchange Act.
Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions and risks and uncertainties
that may cause our actual results or performance to be materially different from any future results
or performance expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. We have identified the
following important factors, which could cause our actual operational or financial results to
differ materially from any projections, estimates, forecasts or other forward-looking statements
made by or on our behalf. Under no circumstances should the factors listed below be construed as
an exhaustive list of all factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
expressed in forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to review or confirm analysts
expectations or estimates or to release publicly any revisions to forward-looking statements
contained herein to take into account events or circumstances that occur after the date of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition, we do not undertake any responsibility to update publicly
the occurrence of unanticipated events, which may cause actual results to differ from those
expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements contained herein.
We have a limited operating history and recorded a loss in 2006.
We began providing EDC services in 1997 and have a limited operating history upon which our
performance may be evaluated. Although we were profitable in 2004 and 2005, we had previously
recognized operating losses in each year since 1997, and again recorded a loss in 2006. Our
cumulative operating loss since 1997 from EDC operations totaled $40,810,000 at December 31, 2006.
Any number of factors, including, but not limited to, termination or delays in contracts, inability
to grow and convert backlog into revenue or being unable to quickly reduce costs if required, could
cause us to record losses in future periods.
If we do not continue to enhance our software, we may not be able to meet the evolving needs of our
customers.
Although our proprietary software solutions have been used in clinical trials, continued
enhancement is necessary to provide additional functions and services to meet the ever-changing
needs and expectations of our customers. To date we have had limited EDC revenue from which to
support the costs of this continued software enhancement. Our potential future revenue may not be
sufficient to absorb corporate overhead and other fixed operating costs that will be necessary for
our future success.
Our quarterly results fluctuate significantly.
We are subject to significant fluctuations in quarterly results caused by many factors,
including
|
|
|
our success in obtaining new contracts, |
|
|
|
|
the size and duration of the clinical trials in which we participate, and |
|
|
|
|
the timing of clinical trial sponsor decisions to conduct new clinical trials
or cancel or delay ongoing trials. |
Our expense levels are based in part on our expectations as to future revenue and to a certain
extent are fixed. We cannot make assurances as to our revenues in any given period, and we may be
unable to adjust
8
expenses in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected revenue shortfall. As a result of our
relatively small revenue base, any significant shortfall in revenue recognized during a particular
period could have an immediate adverse effect on our income from operations and financial
condition. Volatility in our quarterly results may adversely affect the market price of our common
shares.
Our business strategies are unproven and we are in an early stage of development.
Our efforts to establish a standardized EDC process for collection and management of clinical
research data represent a significant departure from the traditional clinical research practices of
clinical trial sponsors. The long-term viability of our business remains unproven. Our strategy
may not gain acceptance among sponsors of clinical research, research sites or investigators. Our
prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently
encountered by companies in their early stages of development, particularly companies in new and
rapidly evolving markets.
We may lose revenue if we experience delays in clinical trials or if we lose contracts.
Although our contracts provide that we are entitled to receive revenue earned through the date
of termination, our customers generally are free to delay or terminate a clinical trial or our
contract related to the trial at any time. The length of a typical clinical trial contract varies
from several months to several years. Clinical trial sponsors may delay or terminate clinical
trials for several reasons, including
|
|
|
unexpected results or adverse patient reactions to a potential product, |
|
|
|
|
inadequate patient enrollment or investigator recruitment, |
|
|
|
|
manufacturing problems resulting in shortages of a potential product, or |
|
|
|
|
sponsor decisions to de-emphasize or terminate a particular trial or drug. |
We may lose revenues if a clinical trial sponsor decides to delay or terminate a trial in which we
participate.
We may lose future revenue if our major customers decrease their research and development
expenditures, or if we lose any of our major customers.
Our primary customers are companies in the pharmaceutical industry. Our business is
substantially dependent on the research and development expenditures of companies in this industry.
The extent to which we rely on revenue from one customer varies from period to period, depending
upon, among other things, our ability to generate new business and the timing and size of clinical
trials. In light of our small revenue base, we are more dependent on major customers than many of
the larger participants in the EDC industry. During 2006, one customer accounted for 44% of our
total revenue for the year. Our operations could be materially and adversely affected by, among
other things,
|
|
|
any economic downturn or consolidations in the pharmaceutical or biotechnology
industries, |
|
|
|
|
any decrease in these industries research and development expenditures, or |
|
|
|
|
changes in the regulatory environment in which companies in these industries operate. |
9
Changes in government regulations relating to the health care industry could have a material
adverse effect on the demand for our services.
Demand for our services is largely a function of the regulatory requirements associated with
the approval of a New Drug Application by the FDA. In recent years, efforts have been made to
streamline the drug approval process and coordinate U.S. standards with those of other developed
countries. Changes in the level of regulation, including a relaxation in regulatory requirements
or the introduction of simplified drug approval procedures could reduce the demand for our
services. Several competing proposals to reform the system of health care delivery in the United
States have been considered by Congress from time to time. To date, none of these proposals have
been adopted.
The FDAs guidelines and rules related to the use of computerized systems in clinical trials
are still in the early stages of development. Our software may not continue to comply with these
guidelines and rules as they develop, and corresponding changes to our product may be required.
Any release of FDA guidance that is significantly inconsistent with the design of our software may
cause us to incur substantial costs to remain in compliance with FDA guidance and regulations.
We may not be able to capture or establish the market presence necessary to compete in the EDC
market.
The EDC market, which is still developing, and must compete with the traditional paper method
of collecting clinical trial data, is highly fragmented. The major competitors in the EDC market
include
|
|
|
EDC software vendors, |
|
|
|
|
clinical trial data service companies that use paper for data collection, |
|
|
|
|
vendors offering single component solutions and |
|
|
|
|
in-house development efforts within large pharmaceutical companies. |
Our current and potential future competitors have or may have substantially greater resources,
greater name recognition and more extensive customer bases that could be leveraged, thereby gaining
market share or product acceptance to our detriment. We may not be able to capture or establish
the market presence necessary to effectively compete in this emerging sector of the clinical
research industry.
We may be subject to liability for potential breaches of contracts or losses relating to the
unauthorized release of clinical trial data.
Our services are supported by telecommunications equipment, software, operating protocols and
proprietary applications for high-speed transmission of large quantities of data among multiple
locations. In addition, clinical pharmaceutical and medical device research requires the review
and handling of large amounts of patient data. Potential liability may arise from a breach of
contract or a loss of or unauthorized release of clinical trial data. If we were forced to
undertake the defense of, or were found financially responsible for, claims based upon these types
of losses, our financial resources could be diminished. We maintain a $5,000,000 errors and
omissions professional liability insurance policy to cover claims that may be brought against us.
This coverage may not be adequate, and insurance may not continue to be available to us, in the
future.
Our competitive position and business may be adversely affected if we are unable to protect
our intellectual property rights or infringe upon the intellectual property rights of
others. See Item 3 Legal Proceedings.
Intellectual property rights, including patent rights, are significant to our ongoing
operations and future opportunities. Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to
secure our own intellectual property rights (e.g., patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade
secrets), obtain licenses
10
to technology owned by third parties when necessary, and conduct our business without
infringing on the proprietary rights of others. There can be no assurance, however, that
our proprietary rights will provide us significant protection or commercial advantage or
that measures taken to protect our confidential information will adequately prevent the
disclosure or misuse of such confidential information. In addition, there can be no
assurance that, in the future, a third party will not assert that we are violating their
proprietary rights, including that our technologies, products or services infringe their
patents. As indicated in Item 3, Legal Proceedings,
such a claim was asserted against the Company in 2006 and is
currently being contested. In that event, we could incur substantial costs and diversion of the time and
attention of management and technical personnel in defending ourselves against any such
claims. Any meritorious claim of intellectual property infringement against us could have a
material adverse effect on our competitive position and business.
We may not be able to successfully integrate and profitably manage our acquired business and our
new software offering without substantial costs, delays or other problems. Acquisitions also may
involve a number of special risks some or all of which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition. Examples of special risks relating to
acquisitions include:
|
|
|
adverse short-term effects on our reported operating results; |
|
|
|
|
potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities or the incurrence of debt
and contingent liabilities; |
|
|
|
|
diversion of managements attention; |
|
|
|
|
dependence on retention, hiring and training of key personnel; and |
|
|
|
|
risks associated with unanticipated problems or legal liabilities. |
We will incur increased costs associated with the integration of our new product suite.
All clinical trials currently being performed with DATATRAK EDC® will continue through
conclusion with that product suite. At this time, it is anticipated that the DATATRAK EDC®
platform will be utilized in these, and perhaps some new, clinical trials until the end of 2009.
As such, we will provide two different architectures for the use of technology in clinical trials
until current trials, and perhaps future trials, using the previous platform are finished. We will
incur additional costs by continuing to support and provide, as needed, appropriate service packs
for the maintenance of DATATRAK EDC® as well as supporting and providing appropriate service packs
for the maintenance of DATATRAK eClinical. We will also incur additional costs to integrate the
DATATRAK eClinical product into our current operating systems. Furthermore, our two product
offerings will run on parallel systems, as such we will incur additional costs of maintaining two
parallel production systems.
We
have Anti-takeover Provisions and Preferred Share Purchase Rights.
Our Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws contain provisions that may discourage a third party
from acquiring, or attempting to acquire us. These provisions could limit the price that certain
investors might be willing to pay for our common shares. In addition preferred shares of our stock
can be issued by our Board of Directors, without shareholder approval, whether under our
shareholder rights plan or for other uses determined by the Board. The issuance of preferred
shares may adversely affect the rights of common shareholders, the market price of our common
shares and may make it more difficult for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding
common shares. At the present time, we do not plan to issue any preferred shares.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
11
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
We presently lease approximately 13,000 square feet of office space in Mayfield Heights, Ohio.
This space is used for our executive offices and U.S. operations. In addition, we have U.S. based
operations in Bryan, Texas, where we lease approximately 6,000 square feet of office space. We
also lease approximately 17,000 square feet of office space in Bonn, Germany for our European
operations. We believe that our facilities are suitable and adequate for the current and
anticipated conduct of our operations.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In the ordinary course of business, we are involved in employment related legal proceedings.
We are of the opinion that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material
adverse effect on the results of operations, cash flows or the financial position of the Company.
On July 17, 2006, Datasci, LLC (Datasci) filed a complaint against the Company, ClickFind
and CF Merger Sub, Inc. (Merger Sub) (Civil Docket No. 8:06-cv-01820-MJG, United States District
Court, District of Maryland) alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 6,496,827 (the
Datasci claim). As previously disclosed, on February 13, 2006, we acquired ClickFind pursuant to
a merger agreement between the Company, ClickFind and Merger Sub, a wholly owned subsidiary of the
Company. Datasci seeks injunctive relief and money damages in an unspecified amount. We believe
Datascis claims are without merit and intend to defend this matter vigorously. On August 14,
2006, we filed an answer and counterclaim denying infringement of the patent in suit, asserting
numerous affirmative defenses and counterclaiming for a declaratory judgment of non-infringement
and invalidity of the patent. Because the litigation is in a preliminary stage, we cannot assess
the likelihood of an adverse outcome or determine whether potential damages, if any, could have a
material adverse impact on the Companys results of operations in a future period or the Companys
financial position or liquidity.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.
ITEM 4A. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY*
The name, age and positions of each of the Companys executive officers, as of February 28,
2007, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position |
Dr. Jeffrey A. Green
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
Terry C. Black
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial
Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary |
Marc J. Shlaes
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Vice President of Product Strategy |
Dr. Wolfgang Summa
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
Vice President of Strategic Business Relationships |
Jim Bob Ward
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
Vice President of Research and Development |
|
|
|
* |
|
Included pursuant to Instruction 3 to Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K. |
Jeffrey A. Green, Pharm.D., FCP. Dr. Green is our founder and has served as our President,
Chief Executive Officer and a Director since March 1992. Prior to joining us in 1992, Dr. Green
served as an Assistant Professor of Medicine and Radiology at Case Western Reserve University,
Cleveland, Ohio. During his tenure at Case Western Reserve University, Dr. Green established and
directed the Cardiovascular Clinical Pharmacology Research Program at University Hospitals of
Cleveland, and was responsible for directing over 90 individual investigations during his tenure.
Dr. Green has authored over 90 publications and has been an invited speaker at more than 170
national meetings.
12
Terry C. Black, MBA, CPA. Mr. Black has served as our Vice President of Finance and Chief
Financial Officer since June 1994 and has served as our Treasurer and Assistant Secretary since
January 1996. Prior to joining us, Mr. Black served in a variety of financial and accounting
positions within the insurance replacement rental car industry.
Marc J. Shlaes, BB. Mr. Shlaes has served as our Vice President of Product Strategy since
February 2006. Mr. Shlaes is responsible for the continuing innovation of our product solutions.
From December 2000 through January 2006, Mr. Shlaes served as our Vice President of Research and
Development. Mr. Shlaes has been employed by us since 1998. Prior to joining us, Mr. Shlaes
served in a variety of positions in the software development and delivery industry.
Wolfgang Summa, PhD., MSc. Dr. Summa has served as our Vice President of Strategic Business
Relationships since April 2006. Dr. Summa is responsible for our Enterprise Consulting Group.
From December 2000 through March 2006, Dr. Summa served as our Vice President of Global Operations.
Dr. Summa has been employed by us since 1998. Prior to joining us, Dr. Summa served in various
research positions within the EDC industry.
Jim
Bob Ward, MS. Mr. Ward has been our Vice President of
Research and Development since
February 2006. Mr. Ward is responsible for the continuing development of our DATATRAK eClinical
product suite. Mr. Ward is the former President and Chief Executive Officer of ClickFind. From
2000 through January 2005, while employed at ClickFind, Mr. Ward developed the workflow and
clinical research applications that make up the DATATRAK eClinical product suite.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON SHARES AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES
OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common shares are traded on The NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol DATA.
Our common shares were initially offered to the public on June 11, 1996 at a stock split
adjusted price of $9.00 per share and commenced trading on NASDAQ on that date. On July 20, 2005,
our Board of Directors approved a three-for-two share split that was distributed in the form of a
50% share dividend. Our shareholders of record at the close of business on August 15, 2005
received one additional Common Share for every two common shares held on that date. The new common
shares were distributed on or around August 31, 2005 and began trading ex-dividend on September 1,
2005. We have restated all prior reported common share and per share amounts as if the share split
had occurred at the beginning of the earliest period being reported. The following table sets
forth, for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the high and low sale prices per common
share, as reported by NASDAQ. These prices do not include retail markups, markdowns or
commissions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
Low |
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
10.10 |
|
|
$ |
6.81 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
$ |
8.48 |
|
|
$ |
6.27 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
$ |
7.65 |
|
|
$ |
5.50 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
5.84 |
|
|
$ |
4.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
Low |
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
14.47 |
|
|
$ |
6.97 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
$ |
12.99 |
|
|
$ |
9.33 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
$ |
16.00 |
|
|
$ |
8.43 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
12.74 |
|
|
$ |
8.48 |
|
13
On February 28, 2007, the last sale price of our common shares as reported by NASDAQ was $5.09
per share. As of February 28, 2007, we had 80 shareholders of record.
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common shares. Any determination to pay
cash dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors after taking into
account various factors, including our financial condition, results of operations, current and
anticipated cash needs and plans for expansion.
(Remainder Of This Page Intentionally Left Blank)
14
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
Statement of Operations Data (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
17,690 |
|
|
$ |
15,735 |
|
|
$ |
11,305 |
|
|
$ |
7,052 |
|
|
$ |
4,721 |
|
Direct costs |
|
|
5,222 |
|
|
|
3,789 |
|
|
|
2,634 |
|
|
|
1,622 |
|
|
|
1,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
12,468 |
|
|
|
11,946 |
|
|
|
8,671 |
|
|
|
5,430 |
|
|
|
2,917 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
13,266 |
|
|
|
10,025 |
|
|
|
7,229 |
|
|
|
5,551 |
|
|
|
7,893 |
|
Other (2) |
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
364 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,306 |
|
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from operations |
|
|
(3,399 |
) |
|
|
1,173 |
|
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
(1,058 |
) |
|
|
(6,462 |
) |
Other income (expense) |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
|
(3,514 |
) |
|
|
1,355 |
|
|
|
826 |
|
|
|
(1,044 |
) |
|
|
(6,391 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
976 |
|
|
|
(1,183 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(4,490 |
) |
|
$ |
2,538 |
|
|
$ |
817 |
|
|
$ |
(1,048 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,391 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share: basic |
|
$ |
(0.40 |
) |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.81 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in the computation of basic net
(loss) income per share |
|
|
11,273 |
|
|
|
10,204 |
|
|
|
9,149 |
|
|
|
8,348 |
|
|
|
7,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share: diluted |
|
$ |
(0.40 |
) |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.81 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in the computation of diluted net
(loss) income per share |
|
|
11,273 |
|
|
|
11,386 |
|
|
|
10,237 |
|
|
|
8,348 |
|
|
|
7,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The operating results of ClickFind have been included in the Companys consolidated results of operations for all periods
subsequent to February 13, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
In 2006, the Company recorded a severance charge of $295,000 due to the termination of 10 employees. In 2002, the Company
recorded special items of $364,000 of which $244,000 was a severance charge related to the reduction of 20 employees and $120,000
was associated with a failed acquisition. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments |
|
$ |
5,016 |
|
|
$ |
9,363 |
|
|
$ |
7,919 |
|
|
$ |
4,261 |
|
|
$ |
2,244 |
|
Working capital |
|
|
4,134 |
|
|
|
10,796 |
|
|
|
8,575 |
|
|
|
3,468 |
|
|
|
1,380 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
27,220 |
|
|
|
16,107 |
|
|
|
11,941 |
|
|
|
6,377 |
|
|
|
5,306 |
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
5,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(32,916 |
) |
|
|
(28,425 |
) |
|
|
(30,964 |
) |
|
|
(31,781 |
) |
|
|
(30,732 |
) |
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
18,064 |
|
|
|
13,697 |
|
|
|
10,117 |
|
|
|
4,601 |
|
|
|
3,231 |
|
Book value per common share (1) |
|
$ |
1.56 |
|
|
$ |
1.33 |
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Book value per common share is calculated by dividing total shareholders equity as of December 31 by the number of
common shares outstanding as of December 31. |
15
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
General
We are a technology and services company focused on providing a platform of software
applications to the global clinical trials industry, which assist companies in the pharmaceutical,
biotechnology, CRO and medical device industries. We assist our customers in accelerating the
completion of clinical trials by streamlining the collection of data relating to clinical trials,
and improving the overall quality of the clinical trial data collected.
The discussion that follows highlights our business conditions and certain financial
information. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Approximately 18% of our assets, or $5,016,000, is held in cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments. Goodwill accounts for approximately 40% of our assets, or $10,863,000. We
recorded an operating loss in 2006 as we integrated an acquisition and recorded non-cash expenses
related to FAS 123(R) (hereinafter defined) stock-based compensation and amortization of intangible
assets totaling $1,608,000 that were not present in prior years. We are continuing to develop and
commercialize our business, and anticipate that our operating results will fluctuate significantly
from period to period. Our future success is dependent on market acceptance of EDC in general, as
an alternative to the traditional paper method of collecting clinical trial data, and acceptance of
our software products specifically.
At December 31, 2006, our backlog was $12,248,000 compared to backlog of $20,324,000 at
December 31, 2005. Our December 31, 2006 backlog consisted of 108 contracts with an average
remaining value of $113,000. At December 31, 2005, our backlog consisted of 69 contracts with an
average remaining value of $295,000. Our contracts in backlog at December 31, 2005 generated
$13,813,000 of revenue during 2006. If we have no delays or cancellations to the contracts in
backlog at December 31, 2006, we expect to convert approximately $8,500,000 of our December 31,
2006 backlog into revenue during 2007. Our contracts can be cancelled or delayed at anytime and,
therefore, our backlog, at any point in time, is not an accurate predictor of future levels of
revenue.
ClickFind Acquisition
On February 13, 2006, we acquired all of the outstanding stock of ClickFind, a company focused
on the application of a unified technology platform for clinical trials, located in Bryan, Texas.
As a result of the acquisition, we believe we have the most extensive software suite in the
clinical trials industry.
The negotiated terms of the acquisition were for an aggregate purchase price of $18,000,000,
less approximately $328,000 in certain transaction expenses and certain indebtedness of ClickFind.
A component of the purchase price was paid with our common shares, priced at $9.25 per share, as
determined by the terms of the acquisition agreement. The acquisition was recorded as a purchase,
and as such, for the purpose of recording the acquisition, the value of the common shares used in
the acquisition were valued at $7.66 per share, based on the average closing price per share of our
common shares for the five business day period from February 9 through February 15, 2006.
Based on the common share valuation of $7.66 per share, the total recorded acquisition cost,
including acquisition related expenses of $796,000, was $16,619,000. The cash portion of the
purchase price, less cash acquired of $87,000, was approximately $4,669,000. The remainder of the
purchase price consisted of $4,000,000 in notes payable and the issuance of approximately
$7,863,000 in common shares (1,026,522 common shares), both of which are excluded from the
Companys consolidated statement of cash flows. The notes payable bear interest at prime plus 1%,
and principal payments are due in installments of $500,000, $500,000 and $3,000,000 on February 1,
2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively. In connection with the Datasci claim, an arrangement was entered
into with certain former ClickFind shareholders for sharing of the expenses associated with that
litigation. Under that arrangement, a certain
16
portion of principal payments due under the notes would be used to offset a certain portion of
the expenses related to the litigation. Of the $500,000 payment due on February 1, 2007, $327,000
was held by the Company to be used to satisfy these expenses as they are incurred. As of March 1,
2007, approximately $70,000 of the $327,000 has been used to satisfy such expenses.
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase, and accordingly, fair value adjustments to
the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded as of the date of acquisition. We have
obtained a third party valuation of certain tangible and intangible assets acquired. We acquired
$6,040,000 of amortizable intangible assets and $10,863,000 of goodwill.
The operating results of ClickFind have been included in our consolidated results of
operations for all periods subsequent to February 13, 2006.
Critical Accounting Policies
In response to the SECs Release No. 33-8040, Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure About
Critical Accounting Policies, we have identified the most critical accounting principles upon
which our financial status depends. Critical principles were determined by considering accounting
policies that involve the most complex or subjective decisions or assessments. The most critical
accounting policies were identified to be those related to revenue recognition, software
development costs, stock-based compensation, goodwill and other intangible assets and income taxes.
Revenue Recognition
DATATRAK recognizes revenue in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin 104, Revenue
Recognition and Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with
Multiple Deliverables. The Company recognizes revenue when all of the following criteria are met:
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery of the product or service has occurred; the
fee is fixed or determinable; and collectibility is probable. DATATRAKs contracts provide a fixed
price for each element to be delivered, and revenue is recognized as these multiple-elements are
delivered. The Company determines objective and reliable evidence of fair value for the price of
items included in its multiple-element arrangements based on vendor-specific objective evidence of
the per element price the Company would sell an item for on a standalone basis or other methods
allowable under EITF No. 00-21. DATATRAK recognizes revenue based on the performance or delivery of
the following specified services or components of its contracts in the manner described below:
|
|
|
Project management and data management (design, report and export) service
revenue is recognized proportionally over the life of a contract as services are
performed, based on the contractual billing rate per hour for those services. |
|
|
|
|
Data items revenue is earned based on a price per data unit as data items are
entered into our hosting facility. |
|
|
|
|
Classroom training services revenue is recognized as classroom training is
completed, at rates based on the length of the training program. |
|
|
|
|
Internet-based training services revenue is recognized on a per user basis as
self-study courses are completed. |
|
|
|
|
Help desk revenue is recognized based on a monthly price per registered user
under the contract. |
Services provided by us that are in addition to those provided for in our contracts are billed
on a fee for service basis as services are completed. Costs associated with contract revenue are
recognized as incurred. Costs that are paid directly by our clients, and for which we do not bear
the risk of economic loss, are excluded from revenue. The termination of a standard contract will
not result in a material adjustment to the revenue or costs previously recognized.
17
Software Development Costs
Development costs incurred in the research and development of new software products, and
enhancements to existing software products, are expensed as incurred until technological
feasibility has been established. After technological feasibility is established, any additional
costs are capitalized in accordance with SFAS No. 86, Accounting for the Costs of Computer
Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed. Such costs are amortized over the lesser of
three years or the economic life of the related product. We perform an annual review of the
recoverability of such capitalized software costs. At the time a determination is made that
capitalized amounts are not recoverable based on the estimated cash flows to be generated from the
applicable software, any remaining capitalized amounts are expensed.
Stock-Based Compensation
On January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment (FAS 123(R)) using the
modified prospective method. Under this method, compensation cost is recognized beginning
January 1, 2006 based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R) for all share-based awards granted
after January 1, 2006, and based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, for all awards granted to employees prior to January 1, 2006 that remain unvested at
January 1, 2006. We used the Black-Scholes option valuation model to calculate the fair value of
stock options granted prior to January 1, 2006.
Prior to January 1, 2006, we accounted for stock-based compensation in accordance with
Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, for
stock options granted to employees and directors, and followed the alternative fair value
accounting provided for under SFAS No. 123 and EITF 96-18 for stock options granted to
non-employees. SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and
Disclosure, requires disclosure of compensation expense under both APB No. 25 and SFAS No. 123.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
We have obtained a third party valuation of certain tangible and intangible assets acquired in
the ClickFind acquisition. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,
goodwill is deemed to have an indefinite life and is not amortized but is subject to an impairment
test at least annually or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. We performed an initial
annual goodwill and other intangible assets impairment test as of October 31, 2006. For purposes
of impairment testing, we determined that we have one reporting unit. We compared the estimated
fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. The fair value of the
reporting unit exceeded its carrying value at October 31, 2006, and therefore goodwill and other
intangible assets was not deemed to be impaired as of the impairment testing date.
Income Taxes
We follow SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This accounting standard requires that
the liability method be used in accounting for income taxes. Under this accounting method,
deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial
reporting basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax
rates and laws that apply in the periods in which the deferred tax asset or liability is expected
to be realized or settled. A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets for which
realization currently is not certain. Quarterly income taxes are recorded at the effective rate,
based on annual forecasted income.
18
Results of Operations
The following table shows, for the periods indicated, selected items from our Consolidated
Statements of Operations, expressed as a percentage of revenue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Revenue |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Direct costs |
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
24.1 |
|
|
|
23.3 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
70.5 |
|
|
|
75.9 |
|
|
|
76.7 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
75.0 |
|
|
|
63.7 |
|
|
|
63.9 |
|
Severance expense |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
(Loss) income from operations |
|
|
(19.2 |
) |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
|
(19.9 |
) |
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(25.4 |
) |
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
Year ended December 31, 2006 compared with year ended December 31, 2005
Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2006 increased by 12.4% to $17,690,000, compared to
$15,735,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005. During the year ended December 31, 2006, we
recorded revenue related to 147 contracts compared to 81 contracts during 2005. Included in the
147 contracts are 25 contracts that were acquired from ClickFind on February 13, 2006. For the
year ended December 31, 2006, we recognized $125,000 of revenue that was previously deferred as a
result of contracts subject to volume discounts. Revenue from Otsuka Research Institute accounted
for 44% of our total revenue in 2006 compared to 59% of total revenue in 2005. For the year ended
December 31, 2006, $13,813,000 of revenue was the result of contracts that were in backlog at
December 31, 2005, $2,442,000 was the result of new business signed since January 1, 2006, and
$1,435,000 was the result of contracts acquired from ClickFind. For the year ended December 31,
2005, $13,513,000 of revenue was the result of contracts that were in backlog at December 31, 2004
and $2,222,000 was the result of new business signed since January 1, 2005. Accounting for the
acquisition of ClickFind as though it occurred on January 1, 2005, pro forma revenue for the year
ended December 31, 2006 would have been $17,899,000, an increase of 4.8% over pro forma revenue of
$17,080,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Direct costs of revenue, mainly personnel costs, were $5,222,000 and $3,789,000 during the
years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Additional staff and other payroll cost
increases accounted for $1,305,000, or 91.1%, of the $1,433,000 increase in 2006. The increase in
staff was caused by the ClickFind acquisition as well as the increase in the number of contracts we
have been managing over the past year. Our gross margin decreased to 70.5% for the year ended
December 31, 2006 compared to 75.9% for the year ended December 31, 2005. Accounting for the
acquisition of ClickFind as though it occurred on January 1, 2005, pro forma gross margin would
have decreased to 70.3% for the year ended December 31, 2006 from pro forma gross margin of 74.7%
for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses include all administrative personnel
costs, business and software development costs, and all other expenses not directly chargeable to a
specific contract. These expenses increased by 32.3% to $13,267,000 from $10,025,000, for the
years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Personnel and payroll cost increases,
director compensation costs, stock-based compensation expense, and our sales and operational bonus
incentive plan accounted for $2,411,000, or 74.4% of the $3,242,000 increase. Of this $2,411,000
increase, $1,578,000 was due to additional hiring and staff costs caused by the acquisition of
ClickFind offset by 10 terminated employees in June, $376,000 was caused by the adoption, and
related impact, of FAS 123(R) in 2006, $257,000 was due to our new sales and operational bonus plan
and $128,000 was due to our director compensation plan. Our travel expenses increased by $372,000
in 2006 due to additional sales efforts and corporate integration.
19
During the year ended December 31, 2006, we recorded a charge of $295,000 for severance due to
10 terminated employees.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased to $2,306,000 during the year ended December
31, 2006, from $748,000 during the year ended December 31, 2005. Included in depreciation and
amortization expense is $1,232,000 of amortization expense related to intangible assets acquired in
the ClickFind acquisition. The remainder of the increase was the result of an increase in the
amount of assets being placed in service.
Interest expense of $353,000 was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2006. This
expense is primarily due to the debt issued in conjunction with the ClickFind acquisition and to a
lesser extent the Companys insurance and capital expenditure financing arrangements.
During 2006, we recorded income tax expense of $976,000 as a result of an increase in our
deferred tax valuation allowance and foreign income tax expense of $126,000.
Year ended December 31, 2005 compared with year ended December 31, 2004
Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased by 39.2% to $15,735,000, compared to
$11,305,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004. During the year ended December 31, 2005, we
recorded revenue related to 81 contracts compared to 69 contracts during 2004. For the year ended
December 31, 2005, $13,513,000 of revenue was the result of contracts that were in backlog at
December 31, 2004 and $2,222,000 was the result of new business signed since January 1, 2005. For
the year ended December 31, 2004, $9,402,000 of revenue was generated from contracts that were in
backlog at December 31, 2003 and $1,903,000 of revenue was the result of new business signed since
January 1, 2004.
Direct costs of revenue were $3,789,000 and $2,634,000 during the years ended December 31,
2005 and 2004, respectively. Additional staff and other payroll cost increases accounted for
$574,000 of the $1,155,000 increase in 2005. Third party license fees, as a result of our license
agreements with Microsoft and SAS increased by $444,000 during 2005. Other direct costs, which are
primarily travel and other costs billed directly to our customers, increased by $137,000 during the
year ended December 31, 2005. The increase in staff was necessitated by the growth in revenue and
the increase in the number of contracts we have been managing over the past year. Our gross margin
decreased to 75.9% for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to 76.7% for the year ended
December 31, 2004.
SG&A expenses increased by 38.7% to $10,025,000 from $7,229,000 for the years ended December
31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Additional staff, other payroll cost increases and our sales
incentive and operational performance bonus plans accounted for $695,000 of the $2,796,000
increase. Expenses related to equipment maintenance and software licensing increased $320,000
compared to the prior year. The increase in these expenses is related to the growth of our
information technology infrastructure, and is necessary to ensure that our IT infrastructure is
properly maintained and licensed. Outside professional service fees, consisting of accounting and
auditing, legal and consulting costs, increased by $1,302,000 during 2005. Of this $1,302,000
increase, $558,000 was related to our Sarbanes-Oxley compliance efforts, $236,000 was due to
non-capitalized software development costs associated with development and modification of internal
operating systems and the remainder was due to initiatives related to enhancing our sales and
marketing efforts and other corporate initiatives. During the year ended December 31, 2005,
$105,000 of expense was recorded as a result of our previously disclosed new director compensation
program. Cost increases in all other areas, primarily related to our overall growth, resulted in
additional expenses of $374,000 during the year ended December 31, 2005.
20
Depreciation and amortization expense increased to $748,000 during the year ended December 31,
2005, from $651,000 during the year ended December 31, 2004. The increase was due to our increased
level of capital spending over the past fifteen months. From October 1, 2004 through December 31,
2005, we had capital expenditures totaling $1,758,000. This compared to $761,000 of capital
expenditures in the period from June 1, 2003 through September 30, 2004.
Other income for the year ended December 31, 2005 totaled $182,000, compared to $35,000 for
the year ended December 31, 2004. Other income includes interest income, which increased by
$200,000. The increase in interest income was the result of the our increase in cash and cash
equivalents primarily due to our December 2004 private placement of common shares and positive cash
flow during 2005 along with increasing interest rates on our investments.
During 2005, we recorded an income tax benefit of $1,183,000. This was the result of a
$1,200,000 decrease in our deferred tax asset valuation allowance. The decrease in our deferred
tax asset valuation allowance was offset by U.S. federal alternative minimum tax of $17,000. Due
to our net loss carryforwards, we had no state or local income tax expense in 2005. For the three
years ended December 31, 2005, we realized taxable income of approximately $1,900,000 on a
cumulative basis. Given our ability to generate profits over the three years from 2003 through
2005, we believed that a full valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets was no longer
necessary. The reduction in the valuation allowance of $1,200,000 recorded in 2005 reflected
estimates, at that time, of the next three years taxable income based on 2005 actual results, with
adjustments for known changes and no assumptions for growth.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of cash have been cash flow from operations and proceeds from the sale
of equity securities. Our investing activities primarily reflect capital expenditures, the
purchases and maturities of short-term investments and the ClickFind acquisition in 2006. In
December 2004, we received approximately $4,376,000 in net proceeds from the completion of a
private placement of our common shares. During 2006, we used $4,669,000 in cash to complete the
acquisition of ClickFind.
On March 16, 2007, we agreed to the terms of a private placement financing with a group of
institutional investors. In connection with this financing, which is currently expected to close
early next week, we will sell 1,986,322 common shares at a price of $4.75 per share. The terms of
this financing include the issuance of five-year warrants to purchase a total of 297,948 common
shares at $6.00 per share to investors in the private placement, and the issuance of five-year
warrants to purchase a total of 29,795 common shares at $6.00 per common share to the placement
agents who assisted the Company in the private placement. The net proceeds from the sale of
the common shares is expected to be approximately $8,797,000 (after deducting the commissions and
certain expenses of the placement agents). In connection with the agreement executed by the
parties, we will grant registration rights for the purchased common shares and the common shares
issuable upon exercise of the warrants. Closing of the private placement is dependent upon the
satisfaction of customary terms and conditions.
Contracts with our customers usually require a portion of the contract amount to be paid at
the time the contract is initiated. Additional payments are generally received monthly as work on
the contract progresses. We record all amounts received as a liability (deferred revenue) until
work has been completed and revenue is recognized. Cash receipts do not necessarily correspond to
costs incurred or revenue recognized. We typically receive a low volume of large-dollar receipts.
Our accounts receivable will fluctuate due to the timing and size of cash receipts. Our
contracting and collection practices are designed to maintain an average collection period for
accounts receivable of one to three months. Any increase in our normal collection period for
accounts receivable will negatively impact our cash flow from operations and our working capital.
At December 31, 2006, our average collection period for accounts receivable was 51 days compared to
56 days at December 31, 2005. Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts) was
$2,226,000 at December 31, 2006 and $2,854,000 at December 31, 2005. Deferred revenue was $988,000
at December 31, 2006 compared to $1,027,000 at December 31, 2005.
21
Cash and cash equivalents decreased $1,388,000 during the year ended December 31, 2006. This
was the result of $659,000 provided by operating activities, $2,102,000 used in investing
activities and $147,000 provided by financing activities. Foreign currency fluctuations caused a
$92,000 decrease in cash and cash equivalents. Cash provided by operating activities was mainly
the result of our net loss of $4,490,000 offset primarily by non-cash depreciation and amortization
of $2,306,000, non-cash stock-based compensation of $574,000 and deferred income tax expense of
$976,000. Changes in other operating assets and liabilities caused a $1,399,000 increase in cash
and cash equivalents. Investing activities included $4,669,000 used for the acquisition of
ClickFind, as well as $503,000 used to purchase property and equipment, offset by net maturities of
investments totaling $3,069,000. In addition to the $503,000 used to purchase property and
equipment we entered into financing and lease agreements in 2006 to purchase $514,000 of property
and equipment which is excluded from the Companys consolidated statement of cash flows. Financing
activities primarily consist of $475,000 of proceeds from the issuance of common shares resulting
from exercises of common share options and warrants, which was offset by debt and capital lease
repayments totaling $336,000.
At December 31, 2006, we had working capital of $4,134,000, and our cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments totaled $5,016,000. Our working capital decreased by $6,662,000 since
December 31, 2005. The decrease was primarily the result of the $4,347,000 decrease in our cash
and cash equivalents, caused mainly by the $4,669,000 in cash used for the ClickFind acquisition.
We are party to a lease agreement that requires us to maintain a restricted cash balance. Our
restricted cash balance was $78,000 at December 31, 2006.
We have established two lines of credit with two separate banks. One of the lines allows us
to borrow up to a certain percentage of our investments, as determined by the type of investment,
held at the bank. The line of credit bears interest at rates based on the prime rate, and is
payable on demand. The other line of credit allows us to borrow up to $2,000,000 at an interest
rate equal to the prime rate minus 100 basis points for U.S. dollar borrowings and the euro dollar
rate plus 125 basis points for euro borrowings, payable on demand. The $2,000,000 in available
borrowing would be collateralized by certain assets held by us. We had no amounts outstanding
against these lines of credit at December 31, 2006.
At December 31, 2006 we had a note payable of $73,807 due to Westfield Bank. The note bears
interest at 7.74%. The final payment on this note of $75,233, including accrued interest, was made
in January 2007. We also had a note payable to Oracle Credit Corporation, payable in monthly
payments of $9,012, including accrued interest through June 2009. Additionally, at December 31,
2006, we had two capital lease agreements with Dell Financial Services, payable in monthly
installments of $7,340 and $735, including accrued interest through August 2009 and October 2009,
respectively.
The terms of our acquisition of ClickFind required us to pay approximately $4,000,000 of cash
to the former shareholders of ClickFind in February 2006. We also issued notes payable to the
former shareholders of ClickFind (the ClickFind Notes) in the amount of $4,000,000 that bear
interest at prime plus 1.0%, and are payable in installments of $500,000, $500,000 and $3,000,000
on February 1, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively. In connection with the Datasci claim, an
arrangement was entered into with certain former ClickFind shareholders for sharing of the expenses
associated with that litigation. Under that arrangement, a certain portion of principal payments
due under the notes would be used to offset a certain portion of the expenses related to the
litigation. Of the $500,000 payment due on February 1, 2007, $327,000 was held by the Company to be
used to satisfy these expenses as they are incurred. As of March 1, 2007, approximately $70,000 of
the $327,000 has been used to satisfy such expenses. Of the $4,000,000 of ClickFind Notes,
$2,618,000 is held by one of our executive officers who was the founder of ClickFind. Of the
remaining $1,382,000 of ClickFind Notes, $1,017,000 is held by other current employees of ours.
We intend to continue to fund the maintenance and testing of the DATATRAK EDC® software, as
well as invest in the development, enhancement and testing of DATATRAK eClinical. In 2007, we
expect revenue from our largest customer to significantly decrease due to the successful early
completion of several large trials. We expect to have negative cash flow from operations during
2007 as we transition from dependence on a major customer to a broader customer base with the
expansion of our eClinical
22
product offering. We also expect to record a net loss in 2007. We anticipate cash
expenditures for property and equipment of approximately $1,000,000 during 2007, for the continued
commercialization, enhancement and maintenance of our two clinical trial product offerings as well
as improvements to our internal operating systems. We anticipate financing approximately 50% of
the $1,000,000 of property and equipment. A portion of the anticipated property and equipment
expenditures are dependent on our growth, and are therefore discretionary in nature.
We record our research and development expenditures as part of SG&A expenses. Our research
and development expenditures will be for the maintenance and testing of our DATATRAK EDC® software
and the development, enhancement and testing of our DATATRAK eClinical software products. For the
twelve months ended December 31, 2006, we expensed approximately $2,310,000 for research and
development. During 2007, we anticipate that our research and development expenditures will
increase by approximately $200,000 to $400,000 compared to 2006.
We expect to fund our working capital requirements from existing cash and cash equivalents,
maturities of short-term investments, cash flow from operations, borrowings against our lines of
credit and the expected net proceeds from our March 2007 private
placement of approximately $8,797,000.
We believe that, with the net proceeds from our March 2007 private placement, our cash and cash
equivalents, maturities of short-term investments and cash flow from operations will be sufficient
to meet our working capital and capital expenditure requirements for the foreseeable future.
However, we may need to raise additional funds to offset delays or cancellations of contacts,
support expansion, respond to competitive pressures, acquire complementary businesses or technology
or take advantage of unanticipated opportunities. We may raise additional funds by selling debt or
equity securities, by entering into strategic relationships or through other arrangements.
Additional capital may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. To the extent that
additional equity capital is raised, it could have a dilutive effect on our existing shareholders.
Contractual Obligations
The table below shows our contractual cash obligations, expressed in thousands, at December
31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
1 3 |
|
|
3 5 |
|
|
More than |
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total |
|
|
1 year |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
5 years |
|
Operating leases |
|
$ |
4,285 |
|
|
$ |
928 |
|
|
$ |
1,660 |
|
|
$ |
1,195 |
|
|
$ |
502 |
|
Debt obligations |
|
|
4,545 |
|
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
3,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations |
|
$ |
8,830 |
|
|
$ |
1,661 |
|
|
$ |
5,472 |
|
|
$ |
1,195 |
|
|
$ |
502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our February 13, 2006, acquisition of ClickFind resulted in $4,000,000 in debt obligations
that are scheduled to be paid in installments of $500,000, $500,000 and $3,000,000 on February 1,
2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively. In connection with the Datasci claim, an arrangement was entered
into with certain former ClickFind shareholders for sharing of the expenses associated with that
litigation. Under that arrangement, a certain portion of principal payments due under the notes
would be used to offset a certain portion of the expenses related to the litigation. Of the
$500,000 payment due on February 1, 2007, $327,000 was held by the Company to be used to satisfy
these expenses as they are incurred. As of March 1, 2007,
approximately $70,000 of the $327,000 has been used
to satisfy such expenses.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company is not a party to any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably
likely to have, a current or future effect on the Companys financial condition, sales or expenses,
results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to
investors.
23
Inflation
To date, we believe that the effects of inflation have not had a material adverse effect on
our results of operations or financial condition.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange
rates since we fund our operations through short-term investments and have business transactions in
Euros. A summary of our primary market risk exposures is presented below.
Interest Rate Risk
We have fixed income investments consisting of cash equivalents and short-term investments,
and short and long-term notes payable which may be affected by changes in market interest rates.
We do not use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio. We place our cash
equivalents and short-term investments with high-quality financial institutions, limit the amount
of credit exposure to any one institution and have established investment guidelines relative to
diversification and maturities designed to maintain safety and liquidity. Investments are reported
at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. A 1.0% change in interest rates during the year
ended December 31, 2006 would have resulted in a $73,000 change in our interest income during the
year. The ClickFind Notes bear interest at prime plus 1%, and interest is paid quarterly. A 1.0%
change in the prime rate during the year ended December 31, 2006 would have resulted in a $35,000
change in our interest expense during the year.
Foreign Currency Risk
Our foreign results of operations are subject to the impact of foreign currency fluctuations
through both foreign currency transaction and foreign currency translation adjustments. We manage
our risk to foreign currency transaction adjustments by maintaining foreign currency bank accounts
in currencies in which we regularly transact business. We do not currently hedge against the risk
of exchange rate fluctuations.
Our financial position and results of operations are impacted by translation adjustments
caused by the conversion of foreign currency accounts and operating results into U.S. dollars for
financial reporting purposes. A 1.0% fluctuation in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and
the euro at December 31, 2006 would have resulted in a $21,000 change in the foreign currency
translation amount recorded on our balance sheet, due to foreign currency translations. A 1.0%
fluctuation in the average exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the euro for the year ended
December 31, 2006 would have resulted in a $68,000 change in our net income for the year ended
December 31, 2006, due to foreign currency transactions. During 2006 the average exchange rate
between the euro and the U.S. dollar increased by approximately 0.9%. The conversion of our
foreign operations into U.S. dollars upon consolidation resulted in net loss that was approximately
$61,000 higher than would have been recorded had the exchange rate between the euro and the U.S.
dollar remained consistent with 2005 rates.
24
ITEM
8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2006 and 2005 |
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2006 |
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2006 |
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2006 |
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
F-7 |
|
Quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, are included
in Note 17 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the
Companys management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the
design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-14(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. Based upon that evaluation, the Companys management, including the chief executive
officer and chief financial officer, have concluded that, as of December 31, 2006, the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files and submits under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in
the SECs rules and forms.
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The management of DATATRAK International, Inc. (DATATRAK or the Company) is responsible
for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. DATATRAKs internal
control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Companys management and Board
of Directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair
presentation of financial statements issued for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
25
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations and may
not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can
only provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial reporting reliability and financial
statement preparation and presentation. DATATRAKs management assessed the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006. In making our
assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of
the Treadway Commission in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework. Based on our assessment we
believe that, as of December 31, 2006, the Companys internal control over financial reporting is
effective, at the reasonable assurance level, based on the COSO criteria.
(Remainder Of This Page Intentionally Left Blank)
26
DATATRAKs independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, has issued an
audit report on our assessment of the Companys internal control over financial reporting which
immediately follows this report.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
DATATRAK International, Inc.
We have audited managements assessment, included in the accompanying Managements Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that DATATRAK International, Inc. maintained effective
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in
Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). DATATRAK International, Inc.s management is responsible
for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the companys internal
control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and
procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately
and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have
a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or
that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that DATATRAK International, Inc. maintained effective
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all
material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion,
DATATRAK International, Inc.
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006, based on the COSO criteria.
27
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of DATATRAK International, Inc. as
of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders
equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006 and our report dated March 12, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion
thereon.
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
March 12, 2007
Changes in Internal Control
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information appearing under the captions Election of Directors, Corporate Governance
Matters and Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance in our definitive Proxy
Statement to be used in connection with our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on June 14,
2007 (the 2007 Proxy Statement) is incorporated herein by reference. Information regarding our
executive officers is included as Item 4A of Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K as permitted
by Instruction 3 to Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K.
We have adopted a code of ethics, as such phrase is defined in Item 406 of Regulation S-K,
that applies to all of our directors, officers and employees and all employees of our subsidiaries.
The code of ethics, entitled Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, has been filed as an exhibit
hereto.
Additionally, we have adopted a code of ethics, as such phrase is defined in Item 406 of
Regulation S-K, that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer,
principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions. The code of
ethics, entitled Financial Code of Ethics, has been filed as an exhibit hereto.
28
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information appearing under the captions Compensation of Directors, Executive Officer
Compensation, Compensation Committee Report and Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation in the 2007 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
The information appearing under the captions Executive Officer Compensation, Equity
Compensation Plan Information and Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Holders and
Management in the 2007 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
To the extent applicable, the information appearing under the caption Certain Related Party
Transactions and Director Independence in the 2007 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by
reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information appearing under the caption Independent Auditors in the 2007 Proxy Statement
is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)(1) Financial Statements
See Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
All financial statement schedules for the Company and its subsidiaries have been included in
the consolidated financial statements or the related footnotes, or such schedules are either
inapplicable or not required.
(a)(3) Exhibits
See the Index to Exhibits at page E-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
29
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DATATRAK INTERNATIONAL, INC.
|
|
|
/s/ Jeffrey A. Green
|
|
|
Jeffrey A. Green |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Date: March 16, 2007
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
/s/ Jeffrey A. Green
Jeffrey A. Green
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
/s/ Terry C. Black
Terry C. Black
|
|
Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
/s/ Timothy G. Biro
Timothy G. Biro
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
Seth B. Harris |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
Robert M. Stote |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
Jerome H. Kaiser |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
Mark J. Ratain |
|
|
Date: March 16, 2007
30
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
DATATRAK International, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
F - 1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
DATATRAK International, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of DATATRAK International, Inc. as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders
equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of DATATRAK International, Inc. at December 31, 2006
and 2005, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles.
As
discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2006, the Company changed
its method of accounting for stock-based compensation.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of DATATRAK International Inc.s internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission and our report dated March 12, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
March 12, 2007
F - 2
DATATRAK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
3,019,184 |
|
|
$ |
4,407,431 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
1,996,393 |
|
|
|
4,955,491 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
2,226,317 |
|
|
|
2,853,823 |
|
Deferred tax asset current |
|
|
113,100 |
|
|
|
287,000 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
488,112 |
|
|
|
702,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
7,843,106 |
|
|
|
13,205,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment |
|
|
8,635,170 |
|
|
|
4,902,894 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
696,571 |
|
|
|
618,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,331,741 |
|
|
|
5,521,303 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
4,595,508 |
|
|
|
3,642,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,736,233 |
|
|
|
1,878,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
78,005 |
|
|
|
69,976 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
1,745,700 |
|
|
|
913,000 |
|
Deposit |
|
|
39,549 |
|
|
|
39,549 |
|
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization |
|
|
1,914,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
10,863,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,640,843 |
|
|
|
1,022,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
27,220,182 |
|
|
$ |
16,106,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
568,697 |
|
|
$ |
549,886 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
73,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
659,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
1,419,065 |
|
|
|
832,860 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
988,175 |
|
|
|
1,027,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
3,709,485 |
|
|
|
2,409,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
3,811,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
1,634,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Serial Preferred Shares, without par value; authorized
1,000,000 shares; none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, without par value, authorized 25,000,000;
issued 14,862,473 shares as of December 31, 2006 and
13,613,161 shares as of December 31, 2005; outstanding
11,562,473 shares as of December 31, 2006 and 10,313,161
shares as of December 31, 2005 |
|
|
70,742,073 |
|
|
|
61,810,321 |
|
Treasury shares, 3,300,000 shares at cost |
|
|
(20,188,308 |
) |
|
|
(20,188,308 |
) |
Common share warrants |
|
|
700,176 |
|
|
|
711,872 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(32,915,699 |
) |
|
|
(28,425,289 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
(274,248 |
) |
|
|
(211,608 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
18,063,994 |
|
|
|
13,696,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
27,220,182 |
|
|
$ |
16,106,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-3
DATATRAK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
17,690,336 |
|
|
$ |
15,734,745 |
|
|
$ |
11,305,112 |
|
Direct costs |
|
|
5,221,665 |
|
|
|
3,788,771 |
|
|
|
2,633,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
12,468,671 |
|
|
|
11,945,974 |
|
|
|
8,671,307 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
13,266,618 |
|
|
|
10,025,029 |
|
|
|
7,229,433 |
|
Severance expense |
|
|
294,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,306,382 |
|
|
|
748,358 |
|
|
|
650,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from operations |
|
|
(3,399,303 |
) |
|
|
1,172,587 |
|
|
|
790,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
237,763 |
|
|
|
243,315 |
|
|
|
42,927 |
|
Interest (expense) |
|
|
(352,870 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(203 |
) |
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60,902 |
) |
|
|
(8,103 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
|
(3,514,410 |
) |
|
|
1,355,000 |
|
|
|
825,534 |
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
976,000 |
|
|
|
(1,183,347 |
) |
|
|
8,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(4,490,410 |
) |
|
$ |
2,538,347 |
|
|
$ |
817,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share |
|
$ |
(0.40 |
) |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
11,273,382 |
|
|
|
10,203,646 |
|
|
|
9,149,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share |
|
$ |
(0.40 |
) |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
11,273,382 |
|
|
|
11,386,413 |
|
|
|
10,237,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-4
DATATRAK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares |
|
|
Treasury Shares |
|
|
Common Share Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Stated |
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Translation |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at January 1, 2004 |
|
|
9,009,027 |
|
|
$ |
56,458,996 |
|
|
|
3,300,000 |
|
|
$ |
(20,188,308 |
) |
|
|
37,688 |
|
|
$ |
135,424 |
|
|
$ |
(31,780,670 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,611 |
) |
|
$ |
4,600,831 |
|
Private placement of common shares |
|
|
729,470 |
|
|
|
3,628,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,628,717 |
|
Issuance of common share warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,399 |
|
|
|
643,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
643,823 |
|
Exercise of common share options |
|
|
166,544 |
|
|
|
328,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
328,824 |
|
Exercise of common share warrants |
|
|
18,750 |
|
|
|
127,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,750 |
) |
|
|
(67,375 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,198 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,949 |
) |
|
|
(1,949 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
817,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
817,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
815,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004 |
|
|
9,923,791 |
|
|
|
60,584,110 |
|
|
|
3,300,000 |
|
|
|
(20,188,308 |
) |
|
|
160,337 |
|
|
|
711,872 |
|
|
|
(30,963,636 |
) |
|
|
(26,560 |
) |
|
|
10,117,478 |
|
Exercise of common share options |
|
|
383,253 |
|
|
|
1,095,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,095,103 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
6,117 |
|
|
|
131,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,108 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(185,048 |
) |
|
|
(185,048 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,538,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,538,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,353,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
10,313,161 |
|
|
|
61,810,321 |
|
|
|
3,300,000 |
|
|
|
(20,188,308 |
) |
|
|
160,337 |
|
|
|
711,872 |
|
|
|
(28,425,289 |
) |
|
|
(211,608 |
) |
|
|
13,696,988 |
|
Acquisition of business |
|
|
1,026,522 |
|
|
|
7,863,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,863,158 |
|
Exercise of common share options |
|
|
173,064 |
|
|
|
472,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
472,637 |
|
Exercise of common share warrants |
|
|
3,258 |
|
|
|
22,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,258 |
) |
|
|
(11,696 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,426 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
46,468 |
|
|
|
573,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
573,835 |
|
Comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62,640 |
) |
|
|
(62,640 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,490,410 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,490,410 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,553,050 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
11,562,473 |
|
|
$ |
70,742,073 |
|
|
|
3,300,000 |
|
|
$ |
(20,188,308 |
) |
|
|
157,079 |
|
|
$ |
700,176 |
|
|
$ |
(32,915,699 |
) |
|
$ |
(274,248 |
) |
|
$ |
18,063,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
F-5
DATATRAK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(4,490,410 |
) |
|
$ |
2,538,347 |
|
|
$ |
817,034 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,306,382 |
|
|
|
748,358 |
|
|
|
650,961 |
|
Accretion of discount on investments |
|
|
(110,259 |
) |
|
|
(173,946 |
) |
|
|
(27,420 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
573,835 |
|
|
|
131,108 |
|
|
|
40,198 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,521 |
|
|
|
60,902 |
|
|
|
18,203 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
773,766 |
|
|
|
(863,875 |
) |
|
|
(1,211,706 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
502,638 |
|
|
|
(213,570 |
) |
|
|
(318,756 |
) |
Deferred taxes, net |
|
|
976,000 |
|
|
|
(1,200,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
364,139 |
|
|
|
247,596 |
|
|
|
280,564 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(241,636 |
) |
|
|
442,158 |
|
|
|
(312,281 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
658,976 |
|
|
|
1,717,078 |
|
|
|
(63,203 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of business, less cash acquired |
|
|
(4,668,925 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,979 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(502,748 |
) |
|
|
(1,282,992 |
) |
|
|
(1,054,189 |
) |
Maturities of short-term investments |
|
|
9,836,194 |
|
|
|
11,500,000 |
|
|
|
7,536,021 |
|
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
(6,766,837 |
) |
|
|
(10,594,588 |
) |
|
|
(10,661,709 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(2,102,316 |
) |
|
|
(377,580 |
) |
|
|
(4,155,898 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments under capital lease obligations |
|
|
(75,362 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,979 |
) |
Payments of long-term debt |
|
|
(260,396 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment, net, of notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
803 |
|
Gross excess tax benefits from share-based payment awards |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of shares, net of issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103,125 |
) |
|
|
4,375,665 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants |
|
|
475,063 |
|
|
|
1,095,103 |
|
|
|
388,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
147,305 |
|
|
|
991,978 |
|
|
|
4,741,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(92,212 |
) |
|
|
(156,321 |
) |
|
|
(17,271 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(1,388,247 |
) |
|
|
2,175,155 |
|
|
|
504,941 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
4,407,431 |
|
|
|
2,232,276 |
|
|
|
1,727,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
3,019,184 |
|
|
$ |
4,407,431 |
|
|
$ |
2,232,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for interest |
|
$ |
258,654 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash paid during the year for income taxes |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid share issuance costs |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
103,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-6
DATATRAK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
1. Accounting Policies
Description of Business
DATATRAK International, Inc. (DATATRAK or the Company) is a technology and services
company focused on global eClinical solutions, which assist companies in the clinical
pharmaceutical, biotechnology, contract research organization (CRO) and medical device research
industries, in accelerating the completion of clinical trials. The Companys wholly-owned
subsidiary, DATATRAK GmbH, provides the Company with various customer support and software
development services. The Companys two other wholly-owned subsidiaries, DATATRAK, Inc. and CF
Merger Sub, Inc. (Merger Sub), are inactive holding companies with no employees that do not
provide any services to the Company or its customers.
Stock Split
On July 20, 2005 DATATRAKs Board of Directors approved a three-for-two share split that was
distributed in the form of a 50% share dividend (the Share Split). The Companys shareholders of
record at the close of business on August 15, 2005 received one additional common share for every
two common shares held on that date. The new common shares were distributed on or around August
31, 2005 and began trading ex- dividend on September 1, 2005. The Company restated all prior
reported common share and per share amounts as if the share split had occurred at the beginning of
the earliest period being reported.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly
owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Revenue Recognition
DATATRAK recognizes revenue in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin 104, Revenue
Recognition and Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with
Multiple Deliverables. The Company recognizes revenue when all of the following criteria are met:
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery of the product or service has occurred; the
fee is fixed or determinable; and collectibility is probable. DATATRAKs contracts provide a fixed
price for each element to be delivered, and revenue is recognized as these multiple-elements are
delivered. The Company determines objective and reliable evidence of fair value for the price of
items included in its multiple-element arrangements based on vendor-specific objective evidence of
the per element price the Company would sell an item for on a standalone basis or other methods
allowable under EITF No. 00-21. DATATRAK recognizes revenue based on the performance or delivery of
the following specified services or components of its contracts in the manner described below:
|
|
|
Project management and data management (design, report and export) service
revenue is recognized proportionally over the life of a contract as services are
performed, based on the contractual billing rate per hour for those services. |
|
|
|
|
Data items revenue is earned based on a price per data unit as data items are
entered into DATATRAKs hosting facility. |
|
|
|
|
Classroom training services revenue is recognized as classroom training is
completed, at rates based on the length of the training program. |
|
|
|
|
Internet-based training services revenue is recognized on a per user basis as
self-study courses are completed. |
|
|
|
|
Help desk revenue is recognized based on a monthly price per registered user
under the contract. |
F-7
DATATRAK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Services provided by DATATRAK that are in addition to those provided for in its contracts
are billed on a fee for service basis as services are completed. Costs associated with contract
revenue are recognized as incurred.
Costs that are paid directly by the Companys clients, and for which the Company does not bear
the risk of economic loss, are excluded from revenue. The termination of a standard contract will
not result in a material adjustment to the revenue or costs previously recognized.
Deferred Revenue
Deferred revenue represents cash advances received in excess of revenue earned on contracts.
Payment terms vary with each contract but may include an initial payment at the time the contract
is executed, with future payments dependent upon the completion of certain contract phases or
targeted milestones. In the event of contract cancellation, the Company is entitled to payment for
all work performed through the point of cancellation.
Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company is subject to credit risk through accounts receivable and short-term
investments. The Company does not require collateral and its accounts receivable are unsecured.
Short-term investments are placed with high credit-quality financial institutions or in
short-duration with high credit-quality debt securities. The Company limits the amount of credit
exposure in any one institution or type of investment instrument.
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less
when purchased to be cash equivalents. Investments in cash equivalents are carried at cost which
approximates market value.
Short-term Investments
Short-term investments are comprised of obligations of U.S. government-sponsored enterprises
and corporate obligations with maturities of one year or less. These securities are stated at
amortized cost, which approximates fair value. The Company has the positive intent and ability to
hold the securities to maturity.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciable assets consist of office and computer
equipment, software and software development costs, and leasehold improvements. Depreciation and
amortization on office and computer equipment and software, and software development costs is
computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of 3 to 7 years. Leasehold
improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the lesser of the assets estimated
useful life or the lease term. Depreciation and amortization expense related to depreciable
assets, including assets recorded under capital leases, was $1,075,000, $748,000 and $651,000 for
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
F-8
DATATRAK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment in accordance with Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting
for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. As such, the carrying values of long-lived assets are
evaluated if circumstances indicate a possible impairment in value. If undiscounted cash flows
over the remaining amortization period indicate that long-lived assets may not be recoverable, the
carrying value will be reduced by the estimated shortfall of cash flows on a discounted basis.
ClickFind Acquisition
On February 13, 2006, DATATRAK acquired all of the outstanding stock of ClickFind, Inc.
(ClickFind), a technology company focused on the clinical trials industry, located in Bryan,
Texas.
The negotiated terms of the acquisition were for an aggregate purchase price of $18,000,000,
less approximately $328,000 in certain transaction expenses and certain indebtedness of ClickFind.
A component of the purchase price was paid with 1,026,522 common shares of the Company, priced at
$9.25 per share, as determined by the terms of the acquisition agreement. The acquisition was
recorded as a purchase, and as such, for the purpose of recording the acquisition, the value of the
common shares used in the acquisition were valued at $7.66 per share, based on the average closing
price per share of the Companys common shares for the five business day period from February 9
through February 15, 2006.
Based on the common share valuation of $7.66 per share, the total recorded acquisition
cost, including acquisition related expenses of $796,000, was $16,619,000. The cash portion of the
purchase price, less cash acquired of $87,000, was approximately $4,669,000. The remainder of the
purchase price consisted of $4,000,000 in notes payable and the issuance of approximately
$7,863,000 in common shares (1,026,522 common shares), both of which are excluded from the
Companys consolidated statement of cash flows. The notes payable bear interest at prime plus 1%,
and principal payments are due in installments of $500,000, $500,000 and $3,000,000 on February 1,
2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase, and accordingly, fair value adjustments to
the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded as of the date of acquisition. The
Company has obtained a third party valuation of certain tangible and intangible assets acquired.
DATATRAKs
acquisition resulted in deferred tax liabilities of $2,054,000. The Company will utilize
its deferred tax assets to offset its acquisition related deferred tax liability.
F-9
DATATRAK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
The
following table summarizes the preliminary fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed
as of the date of the acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, accounts receivable and other current assets |
|
$ |
254,000 |
|
Amortizable intangible assets |
|
|
6,040,000 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
10,863,000 |
|
Accounts payable and other current liabilities |
|
|
(421,000 |
) |
Long-term debt |
|
|
(117,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total acquisition cost |
|
$ |
16,619,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill decreased by $2,054,000 from the preliminary purchase allocation as the deferred tax
liabilities acquired in the acquisition are fully offset by the Companys realizable deferred tax
assets. Subsequent to the acquisition, the $117,000 of assumed long-term debt was paid in full.
The $6,040,000 of acquired amortizable intangible assets were assigned as follows: (i)
$3,330,000 to the software now known as DATATRAK eClinicalÔ; (ii) $1,160,000 to employee
non-compete agreements; and (iii) $1,550,000 to contracts and customer relationships. The acquired
intangible assets are being amortized as follows: (i) the software over seven years; (ii) the
employee non-compete agreements over three years; and (iii) the contracts and customer
relationships over three years. The $10,863,000 of goodwill is not deductible for income tax
purposes. Total amortization expense related to the amortizable intangibles was $1,232,000 during
the year ended December 31, 2006. The estimated aggregate amortization expense related to the
amortizable intangibles for each of the next five fiscal years is: (i) $1,379,000 in 2007; (ii)
$1,379,000 in 2008; (iii) $583,000 in 2009; (iv) $476,000 in 2010; and (v) $476,000 in 2011.
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill is deemed to
have an indefinite life and is not amortized but is subject to an impairment test at least
annually. The Company performed its initial annual goodwill impairment test as of October 31,
2006. For purposes of impairment testing, the Company determined that it has one reporting unit.
The Company compared the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value,
including goodwill. The fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying value at October
31, 2006, and therefore goodwill was not deemed to be impaired as of the impairment testing date.
The operating results of ClickFind have been included in the Companys consolidated results of
operations for all periods subsequent to February 13, 2006. Unaudited pro forma operating results
for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, as though the Company had acquired ClickFind at the
beginning of 2005, are set forth below. The unaudited pro forma operating results are not
necessarily indicative of what would have occurred had the transaction taken place on January 1,
2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Pro forma revenue |
|
$ |
17,899,000 |
|
|
$ |
17,080,000 |
|
Pro forma net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(4,774,000 |
) |
|
$ |
470,000 |
|
Pro forma basic (loss) income per share |
|
$ |
(0.42 |
) |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
Pro forma diluted (loss) income per share |
|
$ |
(0.42 |
) |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
F-10
DATATRAK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Stock-Based Compensation
On January 1, 2006, DATATRAK adopted SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, using the
modified prospective method. Under this method, compensation cost is recognized beginning
January 1, 2006 based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R) for all share-based payments granted
after January 1, 2006, and based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, for all awards granted to employees prior to January 1, 2006 that remain unvested at
January 1, 2006. The Company used the Black-Scholes option valuation model to calculate the fair
value of stock options granted prior to January 1, 2006.
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock-based compensation in accordance
with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, for stock options granted to employees and directors, and followed the alternative fair
value accounting provided for under SFAS No. 123 and EITF 96-18 for stock options granted to
non-employees. SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and
Disclosure, requires disclosure of compensation expense under both APB No. 25 and SFAS No. 123.
The following assumptions were used to estimate the fair value, for the options granted during 2005
and 2004, using the Black-Scholes option valuation model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31 |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Weighted average risk free interest rate |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
Weighted average expected volatility |
|
|
1.07 |
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Weighted-average expected life of the option |
|
|
7 |
years |
|
|
8 |
years |
Weighted-average grant date fair value |
|
$ |
9.90 |
|
|
$ |
6.68 |
|
For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is
amortized to expense over the options vesting period.
Because SFAS No. 123(R) was adopted on January 1, 2006, the Companys statement of operations
for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 does not include stock-based compensation expense
related to the adoption of SFAS 123(R). The following table sets forth stock-based compensation
and pro forma information for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Net income as reported |
|
$ |
2,538,000 |
|
|
$ |
817,000 |
|
Plus: stock-based compensation expense recognized |
|
|
66,000 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
Less: stock-based compensation expense that
would have been recognized under SFAS No. 123 |
|
|
894,000 |
|
|
|
736,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
1,710,000 |
|
|
$ |
121,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma basic income per share |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma diluted income per share |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-11
DATATRAK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
The adoption of SFAS 123(R) increased DATATRAKs selling, general and administrative
expenses by approximately $376,000 or $0.03 per share on both a basic and diluted basis, for the
year ended December 31, 2006. The adoption did not significantly impact the Companys consolidated
statement of cash flows. Because this expense is all related to incentive stock options, and is not
deductible for income tax purposes, deferred tax assets have not been recorded. The Companys
unamortized compensation cost, related to nonvested stock options, at December 31, 2006 was
$676,000. These costs are expected to be amortized over a weighted-average period of approximately
1.5 years.
Income Taxes
The Company follows SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This accounting standard
requires that the liability method be used in accounting for income taxes. Under this accounting
method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the
financial reporting basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the
enacted tax rates and laws that apply in the periods in which the deferred tax asset or liability
is expected to be realized or settled. A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets
for which realization currently is not certain. Quarterly income taxes are recorded at the
effective rate, based on annual forecasted income.
The Company evaluates on an annual basis the need for and the relative amount of
valuation allowance to record against its deferred tax assets. In accordance with FAS 109, the
Company considers all available positive and negative evidence in this analysis. The Company uses
four main sources of taxable income in determining the need for a valuation allowance, they are:
operating income in carryback years, reversals of existing timing differences, tax planning
strategies and future taxable income.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that might
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
Financial Instruments
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, accounts
payable and accrued expenses are reasonable estimates of fair value due to the short-term nature of
these financial instruments. Investments are reported at amortized cost, which approximates fair
value.
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and are included in selling, general and
administrative expenses. Advertising expenses were $336,000, $163,000 and $153,000 for 2006, 2005
and 2004, respectively.
Software Development Costs
Development costs incurred in the research and development of new software products and
enhancements to existing software products are expensed as incurred until technological feasibility
has been established. After technological feasibility is established, any additional costs are
capitalized in accordance with SFAS No. 86, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be
Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed. Such costs are amortized over the lesser of three years or
the economic life of the related product. The Company performs an annual review of the
recoverability of such capitalized software costs. At the time a determination is made that
F-12
DATATRAK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
capitalized amounts are not recoverable based on the estimated cash flows to be generated from the
applicable software, any remaining capitalized amounts are expensed.
Research and development expenses included in selling, general and administrative expenses
were $2,310,000, $1,650,000 and $1,142,000 in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Foreign Currency Translation
The assets and liabilities of the Companys foreign subsidiary are translated into U.S.
dollars at current exchange rates. Revenue and expense accounts of these operations are translated
at average rates prevailing during the period. These translation adjustments are accumulated in a
separate component of shareholders equity. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are
included in determining net (loss) income when realized.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In July 2006, the FASB issued Financial Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FIN No. 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertain tax positions
recognized in an entitys financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes. This interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2006. The Company will adopt FIN 48 as of January 1, 2007, as required. The Company is currently in
the process of determining the effects that adoption of FIN 48 will have on its financial
statements, but does not expect the impact upon adoption will be material.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements. The standard provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and
liabilities. Under the standard, fair value refers to the price that would be received to sell an
asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in the
market in which the reporting entity transacts. The standard clarifies the principle that fair
value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing the asset or
liability. In support of this principle, the standard establishes a fair value hierarchy that
prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. The Statement is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods
within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the Statement to determine what
impact it will have on the Company.
Reclassification
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year
presentation.
2. Short-term Investments
The following is a summary of held-to-maturity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Cost |
|
Obligations of U.S.
government-
sponsored
enterprises |
|
$ |
994,285 |
|
|
$ |
996,622 |
|
|
$ |
1,961,008 |
|
|
$ |
1,980,701 |
|
Corporate obligations |
|
|
993,880 |
|
|
|
999,771 |
|
|
|
2,951,809 |
|
|
|
2,974,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,988,165 |
|
|
$ |
1,996,393 |
|
|
$ |
4,912,817 |
|
|
$ |
4,955,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-13
DATATRAK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
3. Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Trade accounts receivable |
|
$ |
2,226,879 |
|
|
$ |
2,852,524 |
|
Other |
|
|
49,938 |
|
|
|
51,799 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(50,500 |
) |
|
|
(50,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,226,317 |
|
|
$ |
2,853,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in trade accounts receivable at December 31, 2006 and 2005 is $782,000 and
$1,878,000, respectively, from one customer. This amount represents the loss the Company would
incur in the event that all trade receivables from this customer were deemed uncollectible.
4. Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Office rent and utilities |
|
$ |
38,862 |
|
|
$ |
124,169 |
|
Payroll and other employee costs |
|
|
679,776 |
|
|
|
307,432 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
464,356 |
|
|
|
280,114 |
|
Interest |
|
|
94,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
141,855 |
|
|
|
121,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,419,065 |
|
|
$ |
832,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Income Taxes
Income tax expense (benefit) consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States and foreign |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,000 |
|
State and local |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,000 |
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States and foreign |
|
|
976,000 |
|
|
|
(1,200,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
State and local |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
976,000 |
|
|
$ |
(1,183,000 |
) |
|
$ |
9,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-14
DATATRAK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Due to its net operating loss carryforwards, the Company had no state or local income tax
expense in 2006, 2005 and 2004. A reconciliation of income tax expense (benefit) at the U.S.
federal statutory rate to the effective income tax rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
at the United States
statutory rate |
|
$ |
(1,195,000 |
) |
|
$ |
461,000 |
|
|
$ |
281,000 |
|
Non U.S. income tax |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Change in valuation allowance |
|
|
2,025,000 |
|
|
|
(1,690,000 |
) |
|
|
(303,000 |
) |
Other |
|
|
134,000 |
|
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
|
21,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
976,000 |
|
|
$ |
(1,183,000 |
) |
|
$ |
9,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006 the Company had a net operating loss carryforward of approximately
$20,700,000 for United States income tax purposes. An equity transaction completed on January 7,
2002 has limited the Companys net operating loss carryforwards, incurred prior to that date, to a
maximum amount of approximately $1,000,000 per year, under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue
Code. All of the Companys United States net operating loss carryforwards will begin expiring in
the year 2018 and will be fully expired in the year 2026. The Company also has a net operating
loss carryforward of approximately 7,800,000 Euro for German income tax purposes with no expiration
date.
As part of the ClickFind acquisition, DATATRAK acquired $6,040,000 of amortizable intangible
assets. The amortization expense related to these intangible assets is not deductible for income
tax purposes. In accounting for the purchase, $2,054,000 of deferred tax liabilities and a
corresponding reduction of deferred tax asset valuation allowance were recorded. The Company will
use its net operating loss carryforwards to offset these deferred tax liabilities, which the
Company will realize fully by 2013.
The Company has substantial net operating loss carryforwards from prior years. Until 2005,
the existence of operating losses provided sufficient negative evidence under SFAS No. 109,
requiring a full valuation allowance against DATATRAKs deferred tax assets. This situation
changed in 2005, as the Company realized taxable income of approximately $1,900,000 on a cumulative
basis over the three years from 2003 through 2005. Given DATATRAKs ability to generate these
profits, management believed that a full valuation allowance on DATATRAKs deferred tax assets was
no longer necessary at December 31, 2005. In 2006, the Company reported a net operating loss and
was again in a three year cumulative loss position. This cumulative loss resulted in sufficient
negative evidence to require a full valuation allowance against the Companys net U.S. deferred tax
assets. The net reduction in valuation allowance of $29,000 recorded in 2006 reduces the Companys
net deferred tax assets to the amount that will be used against its deferred tax liabilities and
future foreign taxable income, and does not reflect any estimate of future United States taxable
income.
As a result of the ClickFind acquisition, DATATRAK recorded a deferred tax liability
related to the non-deductibility of the amortization expense of certain acquired intangible assets.
The Company will use its net operating loss carryforwards to offset these deferred tax
liabilities, which the Company will realize fully by 2013.
F-15
DATATRAK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
The significant components of the Companys deferred tax assets, stated in U.S. dollars, are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. net operating loss carryforwards |
|
$ |
7,038,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,416,000 |
|
Non U.S. net operating loss carryforwards |
|
|
3,729,000 |
|
|
|
3,822,000 |
|
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforward |
|
|
122,000 |
|
|
|
122,000 |
|
Allowances and accruals |
|
|
115,000 |
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
116,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,120,000 |
|
|
|
10,490,000 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(9,261,000 |
) |
|
|
(9,290,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax assets recorded |
|
$ |
1,859,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006, the Company has $1,635,000 of deferred tax liabilities related to future
amortization expense of intangible assets that is not deductible for income tax purposes.
At December 31, 2006, a valuation allowance of approximately $9,261,000 remains against
DATATRAKs deferred tax assets, which consist primarily of net operating loss carryforwards for
both U.S. and non-U.S. income taxes. Of the $9,261,000 total allowance, approximately $5,518,000
is recorded against the portion of DATATRAKs deferred tax assets that represent net operating loss
carryforwards for U.S. income taxes, and approximately $3,505,000 is recorded against the portion
of DATATRAKs deferred tax assets that represent net operating loss carryforwards for German income
taxes. The remaining $238,000 valuation allowance is provided for other non-current deferred tax
assets.
6. Severance Expense
During the second quarter of 2006, the Company recorded a charge of $295,000 for severance
benefits due to terminated employees. This charge was related to a June 2006 staff reduction of 10
employees, whose positions became redundant as a result of the ClickFind acquisition. As of
December 31, 2006, $7,000 of these costs remained unpaid to a former employee. These unpaid costs
will be paid in the first quarter of 2007.
The Company accounts for termination benefits in accordance with SFAS No. 146, Accounting for
the Cost of Exit or Disposal Activities which requires that termination benefit expenses be
recorded ratably over the period during which employees must provide future services in order to
obtain the benefit. There were no future service requirements in connection with the above noted
terminations.
F-16
DATATRAK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
7. Notes Payable
During May 2006, the Company entered into a financing agreement with Westfield Bank, FSB (the
Westfield Agreement) for the payment of the Companys insurance premiums. At December 31, 2006,
$73,807 is due to Westfield Bank, FSB. The note bears interest at 7.74% and is due in one
remaining installment of $75,233, including accrued interest on January 20, 2007. The Westfield
Agreement is excluded from the Companys consolidated statement of cash flows.
F-17
DATATRAK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
8. Long-term Debt
Long-term debt at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December |
|
|
December |
|
|
|
31, 2006 |
|
|
31, 2005 |
|
Notes payable held by certain former
shareholders of ClickFind (the ClickFind
Notes). The notes payable bear interest
at prime plus 1%, and principal payments
are due in installments of $500,000,
$500,000 and $3,000,000 on February 1,
2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively. Of the
$4,000,000, $2,618,000 is held by an
executive officer of the Company who was
the founder of ClickFind. Of the remaining
$1,382,000 of ClickFind Notes, $1,017,000
is held by other current employees of the
Company |
|
$ |
4,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing agreement with Oracle Credit
Corporation (the Oracle Agreement) for
the purchase of $231,000 of computer
equipment. The terms of the financing
agreement require DATATRAK to make 36
monthly payments of $9,012, including
accrued interest, beginning in July 2006
through June 2009 |
|
|
234,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease agreement with Dell
Financial Services (Dell) for the
purchase of $261,000 of computer
equipment. The terms of the lease
agreement require DATATRAK to make 36
monthly payments of $7,340, including
accrued interest, beginning in September
2006 through August 2009 |
|
|
216,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease agreement with Dell for the
purchase of $22,000 of computer equipment.
The terms of the lease agreement require
DATATRAK to make 36 monthly payments of
$735, including accrued interest,
beginning in November 2006 through October
2009 |
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,472,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less current maturities |
|
|
660,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,812,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Oracle Agreement and the capital lease agreements with Dell are excluded from the Companys
consolidated statement of cash flows as of December 31, 2006.
The following table sets forth the future minimum lease payments on the Oracle Agreement and Dell
leases for the next five years and overall aggregate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
Total |
|
|
$ |
205,000 |
|
|
$ |
205,000 |
|
|
$ |
110,000 |
|
|
$ |
- 0 - |
|
|
$ |
- 0 - |
|
|
$ |
520,000 |
|
F-18
DATATRAK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
9. Operating Leases
The Company leases certain office equipment and space. Rent expense relating to these
operating leases was approximately $795,000, $588,000 and $603,000 in 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. Future minimum lease payments for the Company under noncancelable operating leases
as of December 31, 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31, |
|
Amount |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
928,000 |
|
2008 |
|
|
934,000 |
|
2009 |
|
|
726,000 |
|
2010 |
|
|
596,000 |
|
2011 |
|
|
599,000 |
|
Subsequent to 2011 |
|
|
502,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,285,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
10. Line of Credit
The Company has established two lines of credit with two separate banks. One of the lines
allows the Company to borrow up to a certain percentage of its investments, as determined by the
type of investment, held at the bank. The line of credit bears interest at rates based on the
prime rate, and is payable on demand. The other line of credit allows DATATRAK to borrow up to
$2,000,000 at an interest rate equal to the prime rate minus 100 basis points for U.S. dollar
borrowings and the euro dollar rate plus 125 basis points for euro borrowings, payable on demand.
The $2,000,000 in available borrowing would be collateralized by certain assets of the Company.
The Company had no amounts outstanding against these lines of credit at December 31, 2006 or 2005.
11. Shareholders Equity
On December 28, 2004, the Company completed a private placement of common shares with outside
investors. The Company sold 729,470 of its common shares at a price of $6.33 per share. Net of
expenses, the Company raised $4,273,000 in cash. In conjunction with this private placement,
DATATRAK issued 141,399 warrants to purchase common shares at a price of $9.60 per share. The
warrants, which were valued at $643,823, are fully vested as of the grant date and will expire
three years from the date of grant.
On July 22, 2005, the Companys shareholders approved the DATATRAK International, Inc. 2005
Omnibus Equity Plan (the Omnibus Plan). The Omnibus Plan is intended to be the primary
share-based award program for covered employees and directors. The Omnibus Plan gives the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors flexibility to grant a wide variety of share-based
awards by taking into account such factors as the type and level of employee, relevant business and
performance goals and the prevailing tax and accounting treatments. The fair-value of share-based
awards granted under the Omnibus Plan is equal to the fair market value of a common share on the
date of grant. Pursuant to the Omnibus Plan, a total of 21,364 restricted common shares were
granted to three key employees in 2006. Awards granted to key employees vest ratably over a period
of 12 months following the grant date. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of restricted
stock awards granted during 2006 was $4.65. No restricted stock awards were granted in 2005 or
2004.
F-19
DATATRAK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
The following table summarizes the status of restricted stock awards as of December 31, 2006, and
changes during the year then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Number |
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Fair Value |
Restricted stock awards at January 1, 2006 |
|
|
- 0 - |
|
|
$ |
- 0 - |
|
Granted |
|
|
21,364 |
|
|
|
4.65 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(2,462 |
) |
|
|
5.39 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
- 0 - |
|
|
|
- 0 - |
|
Restricted stock awards at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
18,902 |
|
|
|
4.56 |
|
We recognize compensation expense related to restricted stock awards on a straight-line basis over
the vesting periods. As of December 31, 2006, there was $75,000 of unrecognized compensation cost
related to nonvested restricted stock awards. We expect to recognize that cost in 2007. The fair
value of restricted stock awards that vested during 2006 was $13,000.
Under the previously disclosed director compensation program, in consideration of their
services to the Company, each non-employee member of the Board of Directors will receive, in
addition to cash payments, an annual base compensation grant of $16,000 worth of fully-vested
common shares. In addition, non-employee Directors will receive additional awards of common shares
as compensation for attendance at Board and Committee meetings, as well as for chairing a Committee
of the Board. During the year ended December 31, 2006, non-employee Directors were awarded 25,104
common shares. Stock compensation expense of $153,000 was recorded as a result of the common
shares granted under the director compensation program. During the year ended December 31, 2005,
non-employee Directors were awarded 6,117 common shares. Stock compensation expense of $66,000 was
recorded as a result of the common shares granted under the director compensation program.
Reserved Shares
At December 31, 2006, the Company had reserved 1,870,377 common shares for the exercise of
common share options and warrants. Of the 1,870,377 reserved shares, 322,849 shares are reserved
for future grants under the Companys previously established share option plans. Because the
Omnibus Plan was approved, the 322,849 common share options that could have been granted pursuant
to the Companys previously established share option plans will not be granted.
In addition, at December 31, 2006 the Company had reserved 297,415 common shares for stock
grants pursuant to the Omnibus Plan.
Serial Preferred Shares
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company had 1,000,000 Serial Preferred Shares, without par
value, authorized, with none outstanding.
Treasury Shares
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company held 3,300,000 of its common shares in treasury at
a cost of $20,188,308.
F-20
\
DATATRAK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Shareholder Rights Plan
On September 2, 1997, following the adoption of the rights agreement between the Company and
National City Bank (the Rights Agreement), the Board of Directors declared a dividend of one
preferred share purchase right (a Right) for each outstanding common share, payable to the
Companys shareholders of record on September 15, 1997. Each Right entitled the registered holder
of the common shares to buy one one-hundredth of a Series A Junior Participating Preferred Share
(the Preferred Share) at an exercise price of $30.00 per one one-hundredth of a Preferred Share,
subject to adjustment as provided in the Rights Agreement and as discussed below. The value of one
one-hundredth interest in a Preferred Share purchasable upon exercise of each Right is intended to
approximate the value of one common share.
The
Rights are not exercisable until such time, the earlier to occur of (i) 10 days following a public announcement
that a person or group of affiliated or associated persons (an Acquiring Person) have acquired beneficial ownership of 20% or
more of the Companys outstanding common shares or (ii) 10 business days (or such later date as may be determined by action of the
Board of Directors prior to such time as any person or group of
affiliated persons becomes an Acquiring Person) following the commencement of, or announcement of an intention to make, a tender
offer or exchange offer, the consummation of which would result in
the beneficial ownership by a person or group of 20% of more of the Companys outstanding common shares (the earlier of such date
being called the Distribution Date).
Until the Rights are exercised, the holder has no rights as a shareholder of the Company,
including, without limitation, the right to vote or to receive dividends. Other than as provided
for in the Rights Agreement, the Rights are not traded separately from the common shares and will
expire on September 15, 2007. Pursuant to the Rights Agreement, each Right was adjusted to reflect
the Share Split that occurred in 2005.
12. Share Option Plans
The Company has three share option plans with unexpired options that may be exercised by the
holders of such options. At December 31, 2006, the Company had reserved 3,046,066 common shares
for the exercise of common share options. The Company has granted 2,723,217 options to purchase
common shares to employees, directors and others of which 1,332,768 have been previously exercised.
There are 322,849 options to purchase common shares available for future grants; however, no
future option grants are expected be made under the Companys share option plans. The
weighted-average remaining contractual life of all options outstanding was 4.8 years as of December
31, 2006.
The Amended and Restated 1996 Outside Directors Stock Option Plan, as amended ( the 1996
Director Plan) was established by the Company to provide common share options as compensation to
directors of the Company. Certain options, as approved by the Companys shareholders, were granted
under the 1996 Director Plan at exercise prices below the market value of a common share on the
date of approval. All compensation expense related to these common share options has been
previously recognized by the Company. All other options granted under the 1996 Director Plan have
been granted at exercise prices that represented the fair market value of a common share on the
date of grant. Vesting of options awarded under the 1996 Director Plan ranged from 6 to 36 months.
All options granted under the 1996 Director Plan expire ten years after the grant date. At
December 31, 2006 there were 61,750 options outstanding under the 1996 Director Plan, all of which
were 100% vested. These options had a weighted-average remaining contractual life of 1.4 years and
a weighted-average exercise price of $3.10.
F-21
DATATRAK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
The Amended and Restated 1996 Key Employees and Consultants Stock Option Plan (the 1996
Plan) provides for the granting of options to purchase common shares to key employees and
consultants of the Company and its affiliates. During 2000, common share options totaling 116,031
were granted at exercise prices of less than the fair market value of a common share on the date of
grant. All compensation expense related to these common share options has been previously
recognized by the Company. All other options granted under the 1996 Plan have been granted at
exercise prices that represented the fair market value of a common share on the date of grant.
Vesting of options awarded under the 1996 Plan ranges from two to four years, as determined by the
Board of Directors Compensation Committee, and all options granted under the 1996 Plan expire ten
years after the grant date. At December 31, 2006 there were 802,949 options outstanding under the
1996 Plan of which 653,495 were 100% vested. These options had a weighted-average remaining
contractual life of 5 years and a weighted-average exercise price of $3.94.
The Amended and Restated Outside Director Stock Option Plan (the Director Plan) provides for
the granting of options to purchase common shares to outside directors of the Company. Certain
options approved by Companys Board of Directors and its shareholders have been granted at exercise
prices below the market value of a common share on the grant date in 2000. All compensation
expense related to these common share options has been previously recognized by the Company. All
other options granted under the Director Plan have been granted at exercise prices that represented
the fair market value of a common share on the date of grant. Options
fully vest one year following the grant date. All options granted under the Director Plan expire ten years after
the grant date. At December 31, 2006 there were 525,750 options outstanding under the Director
Plan all of which were 100% vested. These options had a weighted-average contractual life of 4.8
years and a weighted-average exercise price of $2.93.
The Companys share option activity and related information for the year ended December 31,
2006 is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Exercise |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
|
Contractual Life |
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2006 |
|
|
1,619,891 |
|
|
$ |
3.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(173,064 |
) |
|
|
2.68 |
|
|
$ |
520,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(56,378 |
) |
|
|
6.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
1,390,449 |
|
|
$ |
3.52 |
|
|
$ |
2,085,000 |
|
|
4.8 Years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest at
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
1,390,449 |
|
|
$ |
3.52 |
|
|
$ |
2,085,000 |
|
|
4.8 Years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
1,240,995 |
|
|
$ |
3.19 |
|
|
$ |
2,269,000 |
|
|
4.4 Years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. Retirement Savings Plan
The Company sponsors The DATATRAK International, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan (the Plan) as
defined by Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Plan covers
substantially all United States employees who elect to participate. Participants may contribute up
to 20% of their annual compensation into a variety of mutual fund options. Matching and profit
sharing contributions by the Company are discretionary. The Company did not make any matching or
profit sharing contributions in 2006, 2005 or 2004.
F-22
DATATRAK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
14. Net (Loss) Income Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Net (loss) income used in the calculation of basic
and diluted (loss) income per share |
|
$ |
(4,490,410 |
) |
|
$ |
2,538,347 |
|
|
$ |
817,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator
for basic net (loss) income per share
weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
11,273,382 |
|
|
|
10,203,646 |
|
|
|
9,149,127 |
|
Effect of dilutive common share options and warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,182,767 |
|
|
|
1,088,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted net (loss) income per share |
|
|
11,273,382 |
|
|
|
11,386,413 |
|
|
|
10,237,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net (loss) income per share |
|
$ |
(0.40 |
) |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net (loss) income per share |
|
$ |
(0.40 |
) |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common share options and warrants
excluded from the computation of diluted net (loss)
income per share because they would have an
anti-dilutive effect on net (loss) income per share |
|
|
1,721,305 |
|
|
|
14,904 |
|
|
|
63,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-23
DATATRAK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
15. Segment Information
The Company operates in one business segment: the eClinical solutions business.
Enterprise-Wide Disclosures
Geographic Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
United States |
|
Germany |
|
Total |
Revenue from external customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
$ |
17,690,336 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,690,336 |
|
2005 |
|
|
15,734,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,734,745 |
|
2004 |
|
|
11,305,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,305,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
340,921 |
|
|
|
(4,831,331 |
) |
|
|
(4,490,410 |
) |
2005 |
|
|
6,726,776 |
|
|
|
(4,188,429 |
) |
|
|
2,538,347 |
|
2004 |
|
|
4,347,926 |
|
|
|
(3,530,892 |
) |
|
|
817,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets, net at December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
17,274,000 |
|
|
|
239,822 |
|
|
|
17,513,822 |
|
2005 |
|
|
1,768,618 |
|
|
|
109,786 |
|
|
|
1,878,404 |
|
Major Customers
The following sets forth the percentage of revenue generated by customers who accounted for
more than 10% of the Companys revenue during each of the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
Customer |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Sanofi-aventis |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Otsuka Research Institute |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 10% of revenue. |
16. Restricted Cash
DATATRAK GmbH is required to provide a bank guarantee to the lessor of its office space equal
to three months rent. The terms of the bank guarantee require DATATRAK GmbH to maintain a
restricted cash balance of 59,000 Euros with the bank. The U.S. dollar equivalent of this amount
was $78,005 at December 31, 2006.
F-24
DATATRAK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
17. Quarterly Data (Unaudited)
Selected quarterly data is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006 |
|
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
|
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
Revenue |
|
$ |
4,501 |
|
|
$ |
4,829 |
|
|
$ |
4,374 |
|
|
$ |
3,986 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
3,329 |
|
|
|
3,451 |
|
|
|
3,047 |
|
|
|
2,642 |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
(978 |
) |
|
|
(973 |
) |
|
|
(1,357 |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(702 |
) |
|
|
(1,326 |
) |
|
|
(2,381 |
) |
Basic net income (loss) per share |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
(0.12 |
) |
|
|
(0.21 |
) |
Diluted net income (loss) per share |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
(0.12 |
) |
|
|
(0.21 |
) |
During the second quarter of 2006, the Company recorded a charge of $295,000 for severance
benefits due to terminated employees. This charge was related to a June 2006 staff reduction of 10
employees, whose positions became redundant as a result of the ClickFind acquisition.
During the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company recognized $125,000 of revenue that was
previously deferred as a result of contracts subject to volume discounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005 |
|
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
|
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
Revenue |
|
$ |
3,635 |
|
|
$ |
3,724 |
|
|
$ |
4,056 |
|
|
$ |
4,320 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
2,721 |
|
|
|
2,797 |
|
|
|
3,157 |
|
|
|
3,271 |
|
Income from operations |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
Net income |
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
1,332 |
|
Basic net income per share |
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
Diluted net income per share |
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
The Company recorded a reduction in its deferred tax asset valuation allowance, and therefore
increased its net income in the amount of $1,200,000 during the fourth quarter of 2005. As
described further in Note 5, this reduction reflected the Companys estimate of its deferred tax
assets it will be able to utilize over the next three years.
18. Contingencies
In the ordinary course of business, the Company is involved in employment related legal
proceedings. The Company is of the opinion that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not
have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, cash flows or the financial position
of DATATRAK.
On July 17, 2006, Datasci, LLC (Datasci) filed a complaint against the Company, ClickFind,
and Merger Sub alleging a patent infringement. As previously disclosed, on February 13, 2006, the
Company acquired ClickFind pursuant to a merger agreement between the Company, ClickFind and Merger
Sub, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The Company believes Datascis claims are without
merit and intends to defend this matter vigorously. On August 14, 2006, the Company filed an answer
and counterclaim denying infringement of the patent in suit,
F-25
DATATRAK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
asserting numerous affirmative defenses and counterclaiming for a declaratory judgment of
non-infringement and invalidity of the patent. Because the litigation is in a preliminary stage,
the Company cannot assess the likelihood of an adverse outcome or determine whether potential
damages, if any, could have a material adverse impact on the Companys results of operations in a
future period or the Companys financial position or liquidity.
19. Subsequent Events
On March 16, 2007, we agreed to the terms of a private placement financing with a group of
institutional investors. In connection with this financing, which is currently expected to close
early next week, we will sell 1,986,322 common shares at a price of $4.75 per share. The terms of
this financing include the issuance of five-year warrants to purchase a total of 297,948 common
shares at $6.00 per share to investors in the private placement, and the issuance of five-year
warrants to purchase a total of 29,795 common shares at $6.00 per common share to the placement
agents who assisted the Company in the private placement. The net proceeds from the sale of
the common shares is expected to be approximately $8,797,000 (after deducting the commissions and
certain expenses of the placement agents). In connection with the agreement executed by the
parties, we will grant registration rights for the purchased common shares and the common shares
issuable upon exercise of the warrants. Closing of the private placement is dependent upon the
satisfaction of customary terms and conditions.
F-26
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
Page |
|
2.1
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger among DATATRAK International, Inc.,
CF Merger Sub, Inc., ClickFind, Inc., each of the shareholders of ClickFind, Inc
and Jim Bob Ward, dated February 13, 2006
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Sixth Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Code of Regulations
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Code of Regulations
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Code of Regulations
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen Certificate of the Companys Common Shares, without par value
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Form of Warrant Agreement, dated August 8, 2003
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Form of Warrant Agreement, dated December 28, 2004
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Form of Promissory Note
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement among DATATRAK International, Inc. and the
Cash and Securities Recipients, dated February 13, 2006
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Rights Agreement between the Company and National City Bank, as Rights
Agent, dated September 2, 1997
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Amended and Restated 1994 Directors Share Option Plan*
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Amendment to the Amended and Restated 1994 Directors Share Option Plan*
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Amended and Restated 1996 Outside Directors Stock Option Plan*
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated 1996 Outside Directors Stock
Option Plan*
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated 1996 Outside Directors Stock
Option Plan*
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Amendment to the Amended and Restated 1996 Outside Directors Stock Option Plan*
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
DATATRAK International, Inc. 2005 Omnibus Equity Plan*
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Amended and Restated 1996 Key Employees and Consultants Stock Option Plan*
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated 1996 Key Employees and
Consultants Stock Option Plan*
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated 1996 Key Employees and Consultants
Stock Option Plan*
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to the Amended and Restated 1996 Key Employees and Consultants
Stock Option Plan*
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
E - 1
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Amendment to the Amended and Restated 1996 Key Employees and Consultants
Stock Option Plan*
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Amended and Restated Outside Director Stock Option Plan*
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement*
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Company and Jeffrey A. Green, dated
February 5, 2001* |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Company and Terry C. Black,
dated February 5, 2001* |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Company and Marc J. Shlaes
dated March 5, 2003*
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
Managing Director Employment Agreement between the Company and
Wolfgang Summa, dated December 29, 2000* |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Company and Jim Bob Ward,
dated February 13, 2006*
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
DATATRAK International, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan*
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
Limited Software License Agreement between DATATRAK International, Inc.
and Jim Bob Ward, dated February 13, 2006
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Security Agreement with KeyBank
National Association and related Demand Master Promissory Note, each
dated August 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
Financial Code of Ethics
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Management compensatory plan or arrangement. |
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2003 (File No. 000-20699). |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002 (File No. 000-20699). |
E-2
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
Page |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Form S-1 Registration Statement filed on
March 8, 1996, as amended by Amendment No. 1 filed on May 10, 1996 and as amended by Amendment
No. 2 filed on June 10, 1996 (File No. 333-2140). |
|
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Form S-8 Registration Statement filed on
November 13, 1996 (File No. 333-16061). |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004 (File No. 000-20699). |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Form S-8 Registration Statement filed on
April 30, 1997 (File No. 333-26251). |
|
|
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003 (File No. 000-20699). |
|
|
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2004 (File No. 000-20699). |
|
|
|
(9) |
|
Incorporated herein by reference to the Companys current report on Form 8-K dated July
22, 2005 (File No. 000-20699). |
|
|
|
(10) |
|
Incorporated herein by reference to the Companys current report on Form 8-K dated
February 13 2006 (File No. 000-20699). |
|
|
|
(11) |
|
Incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Form 8-A filed on September 19, 1997
(File No. 000-20699). |
|
|
|
(12) |
|
Incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (File No. 000-20699). |
|
|
E - 3