UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

Filed by the Registrant   ☒                              Filed by a party other than the Registrant   ☐

Check the appropriate box:

 

Universal Health Realty Income Trust

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

---

 

 

 

April 30, 2019

Dear Shareholder:

You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting (the “Annual Meeting”) of Shareholders of Universal Health Realty Income Trust (the “Trust”) which will be held on Wednesday, June 12, 2019 at 10:00 a.m., at the offices of the Trust, Universal Corporate Center, 367 South Gulph Road, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania for the following purposes:

Detailed information concerning these matters is set forth in the Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) you received in the mail and in the attached Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement. We have elected to provide access to our Proxy Materials over the internet under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s “notice and access” rules. If you want more information, please see the Questions and Answers section of this Proxy Statement.

Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please either vote by telephone or internet or, if you received printed Proxy Materials and wish to vote by mail, by promptly signing and returning your proxy card in the enclosed envelope. Please review the instructions on each of your voting options described in this Proxy Statement as well as in the Notice you received in the mail. If you then attend and wish to vote your shares in person, you still may do so. In addition to the matters noted above, we will discuss the business of the Trust and be available for your comments and discussion relating to the Trust.

I look forward to seeing you at the meeting.

 

---

 

UNIVERSAL CORPORATE CENTER

367 SOUTH GULPH ROAD

KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19406

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

June 12, 2019

Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting (the “Annual Meeting”) of Shareholders of Universal Health Realty Income Trust (the “Trust”) will be held on Wednesday, June 12, 2019 at 10:00 a.m., at the offices of the Trust, Universal Corporate Center, 367 South Gulph Road, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania for the following purposes:

You are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting only if you were a shareholder of record at the close of business on April 15, 2019. You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting in person.

---

 

WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, PLEASE VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR INTERNET OR, IF YOU RECEIVED PRINTED PROXY MATERIALS AND WISH TO VOTE BY MAIL, MARK YOUR VOTES, THEN DATE AND SIGN THE ENCLOSED FORM OF PROXY AND RETURN IT PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE. YOU MAY REVOKE YOUR PROXY IF YOU DECIDE TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING AND WISH TO VOTE YOUR SHARES IN PERSON.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to be held on Wednesday, June 12, 2019:

The Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Shareholders are available at

http://www.edocumentview.com/UHT

 

King of Prussia, Pennsylvania

April 30, 2019

 

---

 

 

 

Universal Corporate Center

367 South Gulph Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

PROXY STATEMENT

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

3.      Q: Why did Shareholders receive a notice in the mail regarding the internet availability of Proxy Materials instead of a full set of Proxy Materials?

1

---

 

 

The Board of Trustees recommends that you vote your shares FOR the approval of our named executive officer compensation (Proposal No. 2).

The Board of Trustees recommends that you vote your shares FOR the ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP, as the Trust’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019 (Proposal No. 3).

 

2

---

 

 

3

---

 

 

4

---

 

Under the New York Stock Exchange rules, the proposals relating to the election of the Trustees and the advisory vote on our named executive officer compensation are deemed to be non-routine matters with respect to which brokers and nominees may not exercise their voting discretion without receiving instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares.

Since the election of the Trustees and the advisory vote on named executive officer compensation are non-routine matters, a broker may not turn in a proxy card voting shares without receiving instructions from you.

 

5

---

 

Trustee Nominations for Inclusion in Next Year’s Proxy Statement (Proxy Access). Our bylaws permit a shareholder, or group of up to 20 shareholders, owning 3% or more of the Trust’s outstanding common stock continuously for at least three years to nominate and include in the Trust’s proxy materials trustees constituting up to 20% of the board, provided that such nominating shareholder(s) and nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified therein for a nomination pursuant to the proxy access provisions, including timely submission of a notice of such a nomination to the Secretary of the Trust at its principal executive office (no earlier than 150 days and no later than 120 days before the anniversary of the date that the Trust mailed its proxy statement for the previous year’s annual meeting of shareholders) that contains certain information specified in our bylaws. Any shareholder who wishes to use these procedures to nominate a candidate for election to the Board of Trustees for inclusion in the Trust’s proxy materials relating to the 2020 annual meeting must satisfy the requirements specified in our bylaws and must provide written notice to the Secretary of the Trust at 367 South Gulph Road, King of Prussia, PA 19406, which must be received not earlier than December 2, 2019 and not later than January 1, 2020.  However, if our 2020 annual meeting of shareholders is held more than 30 days before or after June 12, 2020, then the Secretary must receive this notice by the later of the 150th day prior to such annual meeting and the tenth day following the date on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by the Trust.

 

Other Shareholder Business for Presentation at Next Year’s Annual Meeting For a shareholder proposal that is not intended to be included in the proxy materials for the 2020 Annual Meeting, or if you want to nominate a person for election as a trustee outside of the proxy access process described in the paragraph above, you must provide written notice to the Secretary of the Trust at 367 South Gulph Road, King of Prussia, PA 19406. The Secretary must receive this notice not earlier than February 13, 2020 and not later than March 14, 2020. However, if our 2020 annual meeting of shareholders is held more than 30 days before or more than 70 days after June 12, 2020, then the Secretary must receive this notice not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to such annual meeting or the 10th day following the day on which we make a public announcement of the date of the meeting. The notice of a proposed item of business must provide information as required in our bylaws which, in general, require that the notice include for each matter a brief description of the matter to be brought before the meeting; the reasons for bringing the matter before the meeting; your name, address, and number of shares you own beneficially or of record of such shareholder; and any material interest you have in the proposal. The notice of a proposed trustee nomination must provide information and documentation as required in our bylaws which, in general, require that the notice of a trustee nomination include the information about the nominee that would be required to be disclosed in the solicitation of proxies for the election of a trustee under federal securities laws and the nominee’s written consent to be named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serve as a trustee if elected. A copy of the bylaw requirements will be provided upon request to the Secretary at the address above.

6

---

 

 

7

---

 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth as of March 31, 2019, the number of shares and the percentage of our outstanding shares beneficially owned, within the meaning of Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 13d-3, (i) by each person who is known to us to own beneficially more than 5% of our shares; (ii) by each Trustee and Trustee nominee and each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table, and; (iii) by all Trustees and executive officers as a group. Except as otherwise specified, the named beneficial owner has sole voting and investment power. No shares are pledged as security by any of our Trustees or executive officers.

_

8

---

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The table below provides information, as of December 31, 2018, concerning securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

 

9

---

 

PROPOSAL NO. 1

ELECTION OF TWO TRUSTEES

We were organized under the laws of the State of Maryland as a real estate investment trust on August 6, 1986. Pursuant to our Declaration of Trust, the Trustees have been divided into three classes, with staggered terms. The terms of the Trustees in Class III expire at this meeting, the terms of the Trustees in Class I will expire at the 2020 Annual Meeting and the terms of the Trustees in Class II will expire at the 2021 Annual Meeting. At each Annual Meeting, Trustees are elected for a term of three years to succeed those in the class whose term is expiring at such Annual Meeting.

The persons listed below include our Board of Trustees and nominees. The terms of the current Class III Trustees, Messrs. Michael Allan Domb and James P. Morey, expire at the 2019 Annual Meeting The nominees for the Class III Trustees are Michael Allan Domb and James P. Morey. They have been nominated to be elected for a three-year term that expires at the 2022 Annual Meeting. The Trustees have no reason to believe that the nominees will be unavailable for election; however, if a nominee becomes unavailable for any reason, the shares represented by the proxy will be voted for the person, if any, who is designated by the Board of Trustees to replace the nominee. The nominees have consented to be named and have indicated their intent to serve if elected.

Pursuant to our Declaration of Trust, a majority of our Trustees must be “Independent Trustees” with each class of Trustees containing at least one Independent Trustee. The Declaration of Trust defines an “Independent Trustee” as a Trustee who is not an affiliate of UHS, the parent company of our Advisor, and does not perform any services for us, except as Trustee. The vote of a majority of all the votes cast at a meeting at which a quorum is present is necessary for the election of the Class III Trustees. A majority of the votes cast means that the number of shares voted “for” a Trustee’s election exceeds the number of shares “withheld” from that Trustee. A nominee currently serving as a Trustee not receiving a majority of the votes cast will tender his or her resignation, promptly following certification of the shareholder vote, for consideration by the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee.

 

10

---

 

The following information is furnished with respect to the nominees for election as a Trustee and each member of the Board of Trustees whose term of office will continue after the meeting.

 

11

---

 

 

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES AS TRUSTEE. ANY NOMINEE CURRENTLY SERVING AS A TRUSTEE IN AN ELECTION WHO RECEIVES A GREATER NUMBER OF VOTES “WITHHELD” HIS OR HER ELECTION THAN VOTES “FOR” SUCH ELECTION SHALL TENDER HIS OR HER RESIGNATION FOR CONSIDERATION BY THE NOMINATING & GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE.  

12

---

 

PROPOSAL NO. 2

ADVISORY VOTE ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

Pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we are asking you to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation paid to our named executive officers as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis below, the compensation tables below, and any related narrative discussion contained in this Proxy Statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives shareholders the opportunity to express their views on the compensation paid to our named executive officers.

UHS of Delaware, Inc. (the “Advisor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHS, serves as Advisor to us under an advisory agreement dated December 24, 1986, and as amended and restated as of January 1, 2019 (the “Advisory Agreement”). Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor is obligated to present an investment program to us, to use its best efforts to obtain investments suitable for such program (although it is not obligated to present any particular investment opportunity to us), to provide administrative services to us and to conduct our day-to-day affairs. Our officers are all employees of the Advisor and although as of December 31, 2018 we had no salaried employees, our officers do typically receive annual stock-based compensation awards in the form of restricted stock. During 2018, we granted shares of restricted stock to each of our named executive officers which had an aggregate grant date value of $481,189 for the entire group. For a description of the long-term incentive awards granted to our named executive officers during 2018, you should read the Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table included in this Proxy Statement. In special circumstances, if warranted and deemed appropriate by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees, our officers may also receive special compensation awards in the form of restricted stock and/or cash bonuses.  There were no special compensation awards made in 2018, 2017 or 2016.

The advisory fee, which was computed at 0.70% of our average invested real estate assets as derived from our consolidated balance sheet (“Advisory Fee”), was $3.8 million during 2018 as computed on average invested real estate assets of $544 million. As part of the annual review process, our Independent Trustees review data prepared by us which calculates the percentages of our aggregate Advisory Fee and other general and administrative expenses (we have no salaries, wages and benefits expense), to our revenues, net assets and gross assets. Those percentages, calculated utilizing our financial data, are then compared to the percentages of the general and administrative expenses, including salaries, wages and benefits expense, of a selected peer group of other healthcare REITs, to their respective revenues, net assets and gross assets.  

During the period analyzed for the 2018 review, our aggregate of Advisory Fee and other general and administrative expenses amounted to 6.8% of our revenues, 1.1% of our net assets and 0.9% of our gross assets. The average of the healthcare REITs in the selected peer group had aggregate general and administrative expenses of 7.4% of revenues, 1.0% of net assets and 0.9% of gross assets. As a result, our Independent Trustees believe that the aggregate of our Advisory Fee and other general and administrative expenses are reasonable in comparison to the average general and administrative cost structures of the selected healthcare REIT peer group.

Since, pursuant to the terms of the Advisory Agreement, the Advisory Fee is derived from our consolidated balance sheet, the nature of amount of the various underlying operating expenses incurred by the Advisor, including compensation paid to our named executive officers, is not determinable and not related to the amount of the Advisory Fee. However, for approximation purposes only, based upon a calculation that includes certain assumptions and estimates related to the portion of time spent by each of our four named executive officers while directly providing services on our behalf, we estimate that approximately $800,000 of our Advisory Fee for 2018 could be allocated to salaries expense incurred by the Advisor in connection with those individuals. This estimate can vary substantially from year-to-year based upon the relative level of our acquisitions, divestitures and other business activities. The estimate is based upon a portion of the fixed salaries paid by the Advisor to of our named

13

---

 

executive officers for services provided on our behalf. The estimate does not include any portion of variable/incentive compensation awarded by the Advisor to these individuals in the form of cash bonus and/or stock-based incentive compensation since those awards made by the Advisor to each individual are entirely measured and based upon performance metrics related only to UHS. Therefore, no portion of the variable/incentive compensation awarded by the Advisor to our named executive officers is attributable to services provided by those individuals on our behalf. 

The remainder of the Advisory Fee could be allocated to various other operating expenses incurred by the Advisor on our behalf including, but not limited to, salaries of other employees of the Advisor that routinely provide services on our behalf (approximately 20 individuals), benefits expense, lease and rental expense, salaries expense for additional employees of the Advisor that, from time-to-time, and as warranted, provide services on our behalf and all other general and administrative expenses.  

This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement. Accordingly, we are asking the shareholders to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the Trust’s shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Trust’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the Trust’s proxy statement for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion contained in this Proxy Statement.”

Vote Required

The affirmative vote of a majority of all of the votes cast at a meeting at which a quorum is present is required for approval of the advisory vote on named executive officer compensation. For purposes of the vote on Proposal No. 2, abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote, although they will be considered present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.

 

The “say-on-pay” vote is advisory and will not be binding upon the Trust, the Board of Trustees or the Compensation Committee. However, the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future named executive officer compensation arrangements.

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION PAID TO THE TRUST’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AS DISCLOSED PURSUANT TO ITEM 402 OF REGULATION S-K, INCLUDING THE COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, COMPENSATION TABLES AND NARRATIVE DISCUSSION CONTAINED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

 

 

 

14

---

 

PROPOSAL NO. 3

RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Audit Committee of the Board has selected, and as a matter of good corporate governance, is requesting ratification by the shareholders of the selection of KPMG LLP to serve as our independent registered public accountants for the year ending December 31, 2019. KPMG LLP has served as our independent registered public accountants since 2002. If a favorable vote is not obtained, the Audit Committee may reconsider the selection of KPMG LLP. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may select different independent auditors if it subsequently determines that such a change would be in the best interest of the Trust and its shareholders.

KPMG LLP representatives will attend the Annual Meeting and respond to questions where appropriate. Such representatives may make a statement at the Annual Meeting should they so desire.

Shareholder Approval

We are submitting the selection of the independent registered public accountants for shareholder ratification as a matter of good corporate governance. Ratification of the selection of the independent registered public accountants by the shareholders requires that the votes cast in favor of ratification exceed the votes cast opposing ratification. If a favorable vote is not obtained, the Audit Committee may reconsider the selection of KPMG LLP. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may select different independent auditors if it subsequently determines that such a change would be in the best interest of the Trust and its shareholders. Unless marked to the contrary, proxies will be voted FOR the ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accountants.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF KPMG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2019.

 

15

---

 

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our Trustees and executive officers, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities, to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our shares and other equity securities.

Based upon a review of the copies of such reports furnished to us during fiscal year 2018 and written representations from our executive officers and Trustees, we believe that during the 2018 fiscal year, the Trustees, executive officers and holders of more than 10% of our shares of beneficial interest complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements.

 

16

---

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Advisory Agreement/Fee and Estimated Portion of Advisory Fee Attributable to Compensation Paid by Our Advisor to Our Named Executive Officers:

UHS of Delaware, Inc. (the “Advisor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHS, serves as Advisor to us under an advisory agreement dated December 24, 1986, and as amended and restated as of January 1, 2019 (the “Advisory Agreement”). Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor is obligated to present an investment program to us, to use its best efforts to obtain investments suitable for such program (although it is not obligated to present any particular investment opportunity to us), to provide administrative services to us and to conduct our day-to-day affairs. Our officers are all employees of the Advisor and although as of December 31, 2018 we had no salaried employees, our officers do typically receive annual stock-based compensation awards in the form of restricted stock. In special circumstances, if warranted and deemed appropriate by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees, our officers may also receive special compensation awards in the form of restricted stock and/or cash bonuses.  There were no special compensation awards made in 2018, 2017 or 2016.

All transactions between us and UHS must be approved by the Trustees who are unaffiliated with UHS (the “Independent Trustees”). In performing its services under the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor may utilize independent professional services, including accounting, legal, tax and other services, for which the Advisor is reimbursed directly by us. The Advisory Agreement may be terminated for any reason upon sixty days written notice by us or the Advisor. The Advisory Agreement expires on December 31 of each year; however, it is renewable by us, subject to a determination by the Independent Trustees, that the Advisor’s performance has been satisfactory. In December of 2018, based upon a review of our Advisory Fee and other general and administrative expenses as compared to an industry peer group, the Advisory Agreement was renewed for 2019. With the exception of the elimination of the of the annual incentive fee formula, as discussed below, the 2019 Advisory Agreement was renewed pursuant to the same terms as the Advisory Agreement in place since 2013.  

Pursuant to the terms of the original advisory agreement, which was in effect from inception through December 31, 2018, in addition to the Advisory Fee as discussed below, the Advisor was entitled to an annual incentive fee equal to 20% of the amount by which cash available for distribution to shareholders for each year, as defined in the agreement, exceeded 15% of our equity as shown on our consolidated balance sheet, determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles without reduction for return of capital dividends. Cash available for distribution to shareholders was defined as net cash flow from operations less deductions for, among other things, amounts required to discharge our debt and liabilities and reserves for replacement and capital improvements to our properties and investments. Since the incentive fee requirements were not achieved at any time from our inception through December 31, 2018, no incentive fees were paid during that time. Given that the incentive fee requirements have never been achieved, and were deemed unlikely to be achieved in the future, the amended and restated Advisory Agreement that became effective on January 1, 2019, among other things, eliminated the incentive fee provision.  

The advisory fee, which was computed at 0.70% of our average invested real estate assets as derived from our consolidated balance sheet (“Advisory Fee”), was $3.8 million during 2018 as computed on average invested real estate assets of $544 million. The average real estate assets for Advisory Fee calculation purposes exclude certain items from our consolidated balance sheet such as, among other things, accumulated depreciation, cash and cash equivalents, base and bonus rent receivables, deferred charges and other assets.

17

---

 

Since, pursuant to the terms of the Advisory Agreement, the Advisory Fee is derived from our consolidated balance sheet, the nature of amount of the various underlying operating expenses incurred by the Advisor, including compensation paid to our named executive officers, is not determinable and not related to the amount of the Advisory Fee. However, for approximation purposes only, based upon a calculation that includes certain assumptions and estimates related to the portion of time spent by each of our four named executive officers while directly providing services on our behalf, we estimate that approximately $800,000 of our Advisory Fee for 2018 could be allocated to salaries expense incurred by the Advisor in connection with those individuals. This estimate can vary substantially from year-to-year based upon the relative level of our acquisitions, divestitures and other business activities. The estimate is based upon a portion of the fixed salaries paid by the Advisor to of our named executive officers for services provided on our behalf. The estimate does not include any portion of variable/incentive compensation awarded by the Advisor to these individuals in the form of cash bonus and/or stock-based incentive compensation since those awards made by the Advisor to each individual are entirely measured and based upon performance metrics related only to UHS. Therefore, no portion of the variable/incentive compensation awarded by the Advisor to our named executive officers is attributable to services provided by those individuals on our behalf. 

The remainder of the Advisory Fee could be allocated to various other operating expenses incurred by the Advisor on our behalf including, but not limited to, salaries of other employees of the Advisor that routinely provide services on our behalf (approximately 20 individuals), benefits expense, lease and rental expense, salaries expense for additional employees of the Advisor that, from time-to-time, and as warranted, provide services on our behalf and all other general and administrative expenses.  

Although this management structure and Advisory Agreement arrangement may create the potential for conflicts of interest, including with respect to advising our Compensation Committee regarding compensation of our executive officers, we believe that the quality and depth of the management and advisory services provided to us by our Advisor and UHS could not be replicated by contracting with unrelated third parties or by being self-advised without considerable cost increases. We also believe that because our Compensation Committee is comprised solely of Independent Trustees, any potential for conflict is mitigated. Please see “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” for more information.

Comparison of Our Advisory Fee and Other General and Administrative Expenses to Selected Healthcare REIT Peer Group:

As part of the annual review process, our Independent Trustees review data prepared by us which calculates the percentages of our aggregate Advisory Fee and other general and administrative expenses (we have no salaries, wages and benefits expense), to our revenues, net assets and gross assets. Those percentages, calculated utilizing our financial data, are then compared to the percentages of the general and administrative expenses, including salaries, wages and benefits expense, of a selected peer group of other healthcare REITs, to their respective revenues, net assets and gross assets.  

During the period analyzed for the 2018 review, our aggregate of Advisory Fee and other general and administrative expenses amounted to 6.8% of our revenues, 1.1% of our net assets and 0.9% of our gross assets. The average of the healthcare REITs in the selected peer group had aggregate general and administrative expenses of 7.4% of revenues, 1.0% of net assets and 0.9% of gross assets. As a result, our Independent Trustees believe that the aggregate of our Advisory Fee and other general and administrative expenses are reasonable in comparison to the average general and administrative cost structures of the selected healthcare REIT peer group.

 

18

---

 

Companies included in the selected healthcare REIT peer group were Healthcare Property Investors, Inc., Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated, Healthcare Trust of America, Inc., LTC Properties, Inc., Medical Properties Trust, Inc., National Health Investors Inc., Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc., Senior Housing Properties Trust, Ventas, Inc. and Welltower Inc.

 

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives:

Our compensation program is aligned with our philosophy by practices that are regulatory compliant, financially sound and provide long-term value to shareholders and generally include the following:

In designing our stock-based compensation program for our named executive officers, we follow our belief that compensation should reflect the value created for shareholders while supporting our strategic business goals. Because of our management structure and advisory arrangement, historically, our compensation program has been basic. The Compensation Committee is guided by the following objectives:

 

These objectives govern the decision-making process with respect to the amount and type of compensation payable to our named executive officers and other personnel. The Compensation Committee reviews our compensation programs annually to ensure that these objectives continue to be met.

Elements of Compensation

In light of our management structure and advisory arrangement, we have historically provided limited compensation to our named executive officers and other personnel. The chief element of our compensation program is the periodic granting of long-term incentive awards. We typically do not pay cash compensation in the form of an annual base salary or cash bonuses to our named executive officers. All of our named executive officers are employees of UHS and, as such, are compensated by UHS.

The Compensation Committee believes that linking executive compensation to corporate performance results in a better alignment of compensation with corporate business goals and shareholder value. Long-term incentive awards are granted to motivate and encourage excellent service and to reward our named executive officers for their respective contributions. Long-term incentive compensation is based, in part, on our performance and the value received by shareholders. As we improve our performance, resulting in increased value to shareholders, our executives and other personnel are rewarded commensurately.

19

---

 

Compensation Setting Process:

Each year, the human resources personnel of our Advisor reviews general financial and compensation related information for companies identified as our peers. Such information includes a summary of revenues, assets, market capitalization and dividend yield. In addition, the stock-based compensation levels of our named executive officers are compared against those of comparable positions in other comparable companies. The compensation market data compiled by the human resources personnel of our Advisor is reviewed on a biennial basis by a third-party consultant for accuracy and reasonableness.

In determining the amount of stock-based compensation awards granted to each of our named executive officers each year, the Compensation Committee considers our overall performance as compared to the peer group, our business activities conducted during the year, and an evaluation of each named executive officer’s individual performance. In addition, the Compensation Committee has traditionally relied upon the input and recommendations of our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Alan B. Miller, who reviews and advises the Compensation Committee with respect to our compensation programs, including the compensation arrangements for our named executive officers and other personnel other than himself. The Compensation Committee believes that Mr. Miller’s role as Chief Executive Officer of the Trust since its inception in 1986 provides a valuable resource to them. Mr. Miller attends Compensation Committee meetings by invitation, however, he does not have the right to vote on matters addressed by the Compensation Committee and he does not participate in the discussions with respect to his own compensation. Compensation for Mr. Miller is determined by the Compensation Committee and typically guidance and advice is requested from the human resources department of our Advisor.

In April, 2007, the Board of Trustees adopted the Universal Health Realty Income Trust 2007 Restricted Stock Plan (the “2007 Plan”), which was amended and restated in 2016 as the Universal Health Realty Income Trust Amended and Restated 2007 Restricted Stock Plan (the “2007 Amended and Restated Plan”). The 2007 Amended and Restated Plan was approved by our shareholders in June, 2007 and is designed to implement our compensation objectives stated herein. The 2007 Amended and Restated Plan, is administered by the Compensation Committee, which has full authority in its discretion, from time to time, and at any time, to select those officers to whom awards will be granted, to determine the number of shares subject thereto, the times at which such awards shall be granted, the time at which the awards shall vest, and the terms and conditions of the agreements to be entered into by our officers and other personnel. Our Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, requested guidance from a third-party compensation consulting firm with respect to the concepts and practices used for development of the 2007 Plan. The concepts and market practices were deemed to be reasonable by the consulting firm and served as the basis for the 2007 Plan. This firm also provided advice with respect to Independent Trustee compensation. The full Board of Trustees is responsible for administering incentive grants to our Independent Trustees. We do not have any plan to select grant dates for our named executive officers and trustees in coordination with the release of material non-public information.

The 2007 Amended and Restated Plan permits the granting of restricted shares of beneficial interest. The Compensation Committee believes restricted stock awards are more effective than stock options in achieving our compensation objectives, as restricted stock is subject to less market volatility and, depending on the total number of shares granted, is potentially less dilutive to our shares of beneficial interest. Recipients realize immediate value as restricted stock awards vest, with the value increasing as our stock performance increases. Cash dividends are paid on all outstanding awards of restricted stock as an additional element of compensation and to provide recipients incentive to sustain or increase our performance. The Compensation Committee believes that periodic grants of long term incentive awards to our named executive officers and other personnel will serve to motivate and encourage excellent service and reward them for their respective contributions. Further, the Compensation Committee believes that this will enhance shareholder value and support our business goals

20

---

 

because such long-term incentive compensation is based, in part, on our performance and the value received by shareholders.

Vesting of restricted shares issued under the 2007 Amended and Restated Plan has historically been based upon continuing service. The Compensation Committee has the option to condition the vesting of a restricted stock award on the achievement of specified performance goals in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Code. If established, performance goals may be based on business criteria such as earnings per share, share price, total shareholder return, pre-tax profits, net earnings, return on equity or assets, revenues and funds from operations per share. Performance goals may be applied to an individual, the Trust and/or any one or more of our properties or other operating unit(s) as the Compensation Committee may designate (in each case, subject to the conditions of the performance-based compensation exemption from Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”)). The Compensation Committee must establish such criteria and targets in advance of applicable deadlines under the Code. While attainment of the performance targets remains substantially uncertain, the Compensation Committee will be responsible for determining whether and the extent to which the performance goals have been attained and the amount of compensation, if any, that is payable as a result. The Compensation Committee must certify in writing prior to payment of the compensation that the performance goals and any other material terms of the award were in fact satisfied.

2018 Compensation:

Since we do not pay cash compensation in the form of annual base salaries to our named executive officers, and typically do not pay cash bonuses, the chief element of our compensation program is the periodic granting of long-term incentive awards.

 

Long-Term Incentives

On June 13, 2018, we granted shares of restricted stock to each of our named executive officers which had an aggregate grant date value of $481,189 for the entire group. For a description of the long-term incentive awards granted to our named executive officers during 2018, you should read the Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table included in this Proxy Statement. As discussed herein, the Compensation Committee believes that in the general absence of cash compensation, it is important to provide our executive officers, including the Chief Executive Officer, an incentive to increase shareholder value by awarding equity based compensation.

In determining the number of shares of restricted stock granted to our officers during 2018, our Compensation Committee reviewed competitive data of a selected peer group. This peer group was updated based on analysis and feedback from our outside consultant, and one peer company (Stratus Properties) was added to our peer group. Data was prepared by the human resource personnel of our Advisor. The data compared the compensation levels of our named executive officers against those of comparable positions in a selected peer group consisting of other comparable advisor managed healthcare real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) in addition to peer companies of self-managed REITs with similar asset size and comparable dividend yield.

The companies in the advisor peer group, which had no salaried employees since they are managed pursuant to advisory or management agreements, consisted of Hospitality Properties Trust and Senior Housing Properties Trust. Companies included in the self-managed peer group were Agree Realty Corp., BRT Apartments (formerly BRT Realty Trust), Care Trust REIT, Condor (formerly Supertel Hospitality), First Real Estate Investment Trust of NJ, Four Corners Properties Trust, Getty Realty Corp., Gladstone Commercial Corp., LTC Properties, Inc.,

21

---

 

Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corp., One Liberty Properties, Inc., Sotherly (formerly MHI Hospitality), Stratus Properties, UMH Properties, Inc., and Wheeler REIT.

The Compensation Committee also considered Mr. Alan Miller’s recommendations and took into account each named executive officer’s position, responsibilities and contribution to our financial performance as well as his or her contribution to our growth and productivity. In addition, historical internal practices for stock awards were also reviewed and used as a basis for determining individual award amounts.

During the period analyzed, the equity grant of our CEO was near the 75^th percentile of comparable values for the advisor peer group and below the 25^th percentile of the self-managed peer group.  Other executive officers grants were slightly above the 25^th percentile of the advisor peer group and below the 25^th percentile of the self-managed peer group. The Compensation Committee believes that the compensation of our named executive officers during 2018 is reasonable in comparison to market rates based on the review of the compensation levels of the selected peer group.

2019 Compensation:

Commencing in 2019, our Compensation Committee plans to consider the granting of performance based restricted stock awards for our named executive officers. Such awards may be based upon performance metrics and indicators such as, but not limited to, the following: funds from operations; adjusted funds from operations, and; total shareholder return compared to one or more external indices such as the NAREIT U.S. Real Estate index for Healthcare REITs or the Morgan Stanley Capital International U.S. REIT Index.

We anticipate that the chief element of our compensation program will continue to be the periodic granting of long-term incentive awards issued pursuant to the terms of the 2007 Amended and Restated Plan. We do not intend to pay cash compensation in the form of an annual base salary to our named executive officers in 2019. The peer group and market data prepared by the human resource personnel of our Advisor during 2019 will be reviewed by our outside consultant for accuracy and reasonableness.

Rewards/Compensation Risk Analysis:

Since we typically pay no cash compensation and have historically had no incentive plans that are directly correlated to earnings, revenues or cash flows, we believe there were no excessive risks encouraged by the Trust’s stock-based compensation awards and that the awards do not produce compensation that have a material impact on the financial performance of the Trust.

Summary:

The foregoing discussion describes: (i) the compensation objectives and policies that were utilized with respect to our named executive officers and other personnel during 2018, and; (ii) our anticipated compensation program for 2019.

In the future, as the Compensation Committee continues to review each element of the executive compensation program with respect to our named executive officers and other personnel, the objectives of our executive compensation program, as well as the methods that the Compensation Committee utilizes to determine both the types and amounts of compensation to award to our named executive officers and other personnel, may change.

22

---

 

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management; and based on the review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Trustees that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Trust’s Proxy Statement.

 

 

23

---

 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees is currently composed of Gayle L. Capozzalo, Robert F. McCadden and Michael Allan Domb. All of the members of the Compensation Committee are Independent Trustees and no member of the Compensation Committee or any person who served as a member of the Compensation Committee during any part of 2018 has ever been one of our officers or employees, nor has had any relationship with us that requires disclosure.

 

24

---

 

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table sets forth information regarding compensation earned by our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and the two other executive officers during the last three fiscal years. We have no other executive officers. We refer to these officers collectively as our named executive officers.

 

 

25

---

 

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

The following table provides information regarding plan-based awards granted during fiscal year 2018 to our named executive officers.

 

 

 

26

---

 

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT DECEMBER 31, 2018

The following table provides information about the number of outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers at December 31, 2018.

 

 

 

27

---

 

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED

The following table provides information about stock option exercises by, and the vesting of stock for, our named executive officers during fiscal year 2018.

 

 

28

---

 

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE-IN-CONTROL

There are no potential payments committed to our named executive officers in connection with their termination or in the event of a change of control of the Trust. However, the Board of Trustees or Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, may approve the immediate vesting of all shares of restricted stock.

TRUSTEE COMPENSATION

2018 TRUSTEE COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table sets forth a summary of the compensation we paid to our Trustees during fiscal year 2018.

 

In June, 2018, the Compensation Committee reviewed selected peer group data to assess the competitiveness of our Independent Trustee compensation. This peer group was updated based on analysis and feedback from our outside consultant, and one additional peer company was added to our review.

The data was prepared by the human resource personnel of our Advisor The selected peer group included companies comparable to us based upon the following criteria: (i) total assets (selected companies with 2017 year-end total assets ranging from $243 million to $1.5 billion), and; (ii) scope of operations (selected companies with investments in commercial real estate). The selected peer group included the following companies: Agree Realty Corp., BRT Apartments (formerly BRT Realty Trust), Care Trust REIT, Condor (formerly Supertel Hospitality), First Real Estate Investment Trust of NJ, Four Corners Properties Trust, Getty Realty Corp., Gladstone

29

---

 

Commercial Corp., LTC Properties, Inc., Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corp., One Liberty Properties, Inc., Sotherly (formerly MHI Hospitality), Stratus Properties, UMH Properties, Inc. and Wheeler REIT.

During 2018, each Independent Trustee was paid annual compensation of $20,000 for service on the Board of Trustees. In addition, each Independent Trustee was paid $1,000 for attendance in person at each regular meeting of the Board of Trustees, or $500 for telephonic participation. An additional $500 was paid for participation in each Committee meeting or special meeting of the Board of Trustees.

 

During 2018:

Gayle L. Capozzalo, who was elected to our Board of Trustees in March, 2018, was compensated $979 for her services as the Compensation Committee Chairman, $1,024 for her services as a member of the Audit Committee and $8,000 for meeting fees.

Michael Allan Domb was compensated $106 for his services as a temporary member of the Audit Committee (effective June 15 through July 15, 2018), and $3,500 for meeting fees.

 

Robert F. McCadden, Lead Trustee, was compensated $2,500 for his services in that capacity, $1,250 as Nominating & Governance Committee Chairman, $2,767 for his services as Audit Committee Chairman (commencing in June, 2018), $558 for his services as a member of the Audit Committee (prior to becoming the Audit Committee Chairman) and $10,500 for meeting fees.

James P. Morey, who was elected to our Board of Trustees in July, 2018, was compensated $579 for his services as a member of the Audit Committee and $4,000 for meeting fees.

James E. Dalton, who retired from our Board of Trustees in June, 2018, was compensated $2,233 for his services as Audit Committee Chairman, and $2,500 for meeting fees.

Elliot J. Sussman, M.D., who resigned from our Board of Trustees in March, 2018, was compensated $313 for his services as Chairman of the Compensation Committee, $312 for his services as a member of the Audit Committee and $2,500 for meeting fees.

All travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties as Trustees were reimbursed to the Trustees.

Trustee Independence

The Board of Trustees has affirmatively determined that four of its six current members (Gayle L. Capozzalo, Michael Allan Domb, Robert F. McCadden and James P. Morey) are “independent” under the applicable SEC rules and regulations and the NYSE listing standards. The Board of Trustees previously determined that James E. Dalton and Elliot J. Sussman, M.D., who retired/resigned from the Board of Trustees during 2018, were also independent under such standards during their terms of service in 2018. In determining independence, the Board of Trustees affirmatively determines each year whether Trustees have any material relationship with us. When assessing the materiality of a Trustee’s relationship with us, the Board of Trustees considers all relevant facts and circumstances, not merely from the Trustee’s standpoint, but also from the standpoint of the persons or organizations with which the Trustee has an affiliation. Material relationships can include commercial, banking, industrial, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable and familial relationships. The Board of Trustees has concluded that no material relationship exists between us and any of our Independent Trustees other than each such person’s position as one of our Trustees.

30

---

 

Meetings of the Board of Trustees

Regular meetings of the Board of Trustees are generally held quarterly, while special meetings are called when necessary. Before each meeting, Trustees are furnished with an agenda and background materials relating to matters to be discussed. During 2018, there were four regular meetings of the Board of Trustees. With the exception of two Trustees that were absent once for different Board meetings, all Trustees participated in all of the Board meetings and all of their applicable committee meetings of the Board of Trustees. Trustees are expected to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. All but one of our Trustees attended the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Our Governance Guidelines provide that the Board of Trustees shall hold, in accordance with a schedule determined by the Nominating & Governance Committee, executive sessions where non-management Trustees (i.e., Trustees who are not our officers, but who do not otherwise have to qualify as “Independent Trustees”) meet without management participation (except as otherwise specifically requested by the non-management Trustees). The Independent Trustees met without management participation in December, 2018. The Lead Trustee is currently Robert F. McCadden. Interested parties may communicate directly and confidentially with the Lead Trustee or with the non-management Trustees of the Board of Trustees as a group by writing to that person at Universal Health Realty Income Trust, c/o Secretary, Universal Corporate Center, 367 South Gulph Road, King of Prussia, PA 19406.

Board Leadership Structure and Board of Trustees

Mr. Alan B. Miller serves as the Trust’s Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President. Robert F. McCadden is the Lead Trustee. The Trust believes this structure allows all of the non-management Trustees to participate in the full range of the Board’s responsibilities with respect to its oversight of the Trust’s management. The Board has determined that this leadership structure is appropriate given the size and complexity of the Trust, the number of trustees overseeing the Trust and the Board’s oversight responsibilities.

The specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion that each Trustee should serve as a Trustee of the Trust, in light of the Trust’s business and structure, are as follows:

Alan B. Miller has been a Trustee of the Trust since 1986. Mr. Alan Miller has been the Trust’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer since 1986 and President since February, 2003. Mr. Alan Miller has been Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Universal Health Services, Inc. (“UHS”) since 1978 and previously served as President until May, 2009. Prior thereto, he was President, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of American Medicorp, Inc. As a result of his many years of experience, Mr. Miller provides expertise on the healthcare and hospital management industries.

Marc D. Miller has been a Trustee of the Trust since 2008. He was appointed President of UHS in May, 2009 and prior thereto served as Senior Vice President and Co-Head of UHS’s Acute Care Division since 2007. Mr. Marc Miller was elected as a Vice-President of UHS in 2005 and has served in various capacities related to UHS’s acute care division since 2000. Additionally, Mr. Marc Miller serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Premier, Inc., a healthcare performance improvement alliance which contracts with UHS pursuant to a group purchasing agreement. Mr. Marc Miller provides expertise on the healthcare and hospital management industries.

 

Gayle L. Capozzalo was elected to our Board of Trustees in March, 2018. Ms. Capozzalo formerly served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer of Yale New Haven Health since 1997. Prior thereto, she served as Senior Vice President, Organizational Development at Sisters of Charity of the Incarnate Word

31

---

 

Health Care System. Ms. Capozzalo has more than 30 years of experience in strategy, organizational development, and management and has significantly grown, and integrated successful healthcare systems. She recently was appointed to the .406 Ventures Healthcare Executive Council, a venture capital firm specializing in early stage and de novo investments in emerging market segments in Fintech sector and is the Senior Strategy Advisor to PhysicianOne Urgent Care, a private equity company. Ms. Capozzalo provides expertise on the management of hospitals and health systems.

 

Michael Allan Domb was elected to our Board of Trustees in December, 2017.  Mr. Domb is the owner of Allan Domb Real Estate, a multi-faceted real estate firm focused on the brokerage, development, investment and management of residential and commercial condominiums, multifamily and office buildings, and mixed-use real estate in Philadelphia. He is an investor in multiple restaurant groups in Philadelphia and sits on the boards of six condominium associations. From 2013 to 2015, Mr. Domb served as the President of the Greater Philadelphia Association of Realtors. In 2015, Mr. Domb was elected to serve the City of Philadelphia as a Councilman At-Large. Mr. Domb provides expertise on real estate matters and business investments    

 

Robert F. McCadden has been a member of our Board of Trustees since December, 2013. He is currently Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust since his appointment in 2004. Formerly, he served as audit partner of KPMG LLP from 2002 to 2004 and audit partner of Arthur Andersen LLP from 1993 to 2002. Mr. McCadden provides accounting and financial expertise as well as public company REIT experience.

 

 

James P. Morey was elected to our Board of Trustees in July, 2018. He has served as the Executive Vice President, Chief Marketing and Brand Officer for Wawa, Inc. since January, 2017. Prior thereto, he held various roles at Wawa, including Chief Operations Officer, responsible for all of Store Operations, Real Estate and Supply Chain, as well as serving as Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining Wawa, Mr. Morey was Group Vice President of Financial Strategy, Planning, Tax and Treasury for Bloomin’ Brands, and prior thereto he held various financial and operational roles with McDonald’s Corporation. Mr. Morey provides accounting and financial expertise.

The Board holds four regular meetings each year to consider and address matters involving the Trust. The Board also may hold special meetings to address matters arising between regular meetings. These meetings may take place in person or by telephone. The Independent Trustees also regularly meet in executive sessions outside the presence of management. The Board has access to legal counsel for consultation concerning any issues that may occur during or between regularly scheduled Board meetings. As discussed below, the Board has established a Compensation Committee, an Audit Committee and a Nominating & Governance Committee to assist the Board in performing its oversight responsibilities.

The Nominating & Governance Committee annually oversees a self-evaluation of the current Board members and those committees as the Board shall specify from time to time and reports to the Board with respect to whether the Board and its committees are functioning effectively. The full Board discusses each evaluation report to determine what, if any, actions should be taken to improve the effectiveness of the Board or any committee thereof.

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

Consistent with its responsibility for oversight of the Trust, the Board, among other things, oversees risk management of the Trust’s business affairs directly and through the committee structure that it has established. The principal risks associated with the Trust are risks related to a worsening of the economic and employment conditions in the United States; indirect dependence on payments from the government and other third party

32

---

 

payors; reductions or changes in Medicare funding; failure of the operators of our hospital facilities to comply with governmental regulations related to the Medicare and Medicaid licensing and certification requirements which could materially, adversely impact our future revenues and underlying value of the property; uncertainties regarding health care legislation; competition for patients from other hospitals and health care providers; operators’ inability to meet their obligations to us; the deterioration of credit and capital markets; dependence on one operator (UHS) for a substantial portion of our revenues; potential conflicts of interest with UHS; lost revenues resulting from the exercise of purchase options, lease expirations and renewals, loan repayments and other restructuring; non-controlling equity ownership interests we hold in various limited liability companies; the bankruptcy, default, insolvency or financial deterioration of our tenants; real estate ownership; significant potential liabilities and rising insurance costs and availability; the impact on property values and results of operations from severe weather conditions and other damaging events; failure to maintain our REIT status; the fact that dividends paid by REITs generally do not qualify for reduced tax rates; U.S. federal tax reform legislation that could affect REITs in ways that are difficult to anticipate; strict income distribution requirements applicable to REITs; the market value of our common stock could be substantially affected by various factors; ownership limitations and anti-takeover provisions in our declaration of trust and bylaws and under Maryland law and in our leases with UHS; dependence on key management personnel; increasing investor interest in our sector and consolidation at the operator or REIT level; failure to comply with all applicable corporate regulation as a public company; and different interpretations of accounting principles could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

 

The Board’s role in the Trust’s risk oversight process includes regular reports from senior management on areas of material risk to the Trust, including operational, financial, legal and regulatory, and strategic and reputational risks. The full Board (or the appropriate committee) receives these reports from management to identify and discuss such risks.

The Board periodically reviews with management its strategies, techniques, policies and procedures designed to manage these risks. Under the overall supervision of the Board, management has implemented a variety of processes, procedures and controls to address these risks.

The Board requires management to report to the full Board on a variety of matters at regular meetings of the Board and on an as-needed basis, including the performance and operations of the Trust and other matters relating to risk management. The Audit Committee also receives regular reports from the Trust’s independent registered public accounting firm on internal control and financial reporting matters. These reviews are conducted in conjunction with the Board’s risk oversight function and enable the Board to review and assess any material risks facing the Trust. The Lead Trustee periodically meets with management and the Trust’s independent registered public accounting firm to review and discuss the activities of the Trust and to provide direction with respect thereto.

Shareholder Communications

Shareholders who wish to send communications to the Board of Trustees or an individual Trustee should address such communications to Universal Health Realty Income Trust, c/o Secretary, Universal Corporate Center, 367 South Gulph Road, King of Prussia, PA 19406. The Secretary will forward such communications to the Board of Trustees or the specified individual Trustee to whom the communication is directed unless such communication is unduly hostile, threatening, illegal or similarly inappropriate, in which case the Secretary has the authority to discard the communication or take appropriate legal action regarding such communication.

33

---

 

Committees of the Board of Trustees

A current copy of our Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Compensation Committee Charter, Nominating & Governance Committee Charter and Audit Committee Charter are available free of charge on our website at www.uhrit.com. Copies of these documents also are available in print free of charge to any shareholder who requests a copy. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirements under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K relating to amendments to or waivers of any provision of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by promptly posting the information on our website.

Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee met twice in 2018. Current members of the Compensation Committee are Gayle L. Capozzalo, who serves as the Compensation Committee Chairman, Michael Allan Domb, and Robert F. McCadden. The members of the Compensation Committee are independent pursuant to the applicable SEC rules and regulations and the listing standards of the NYSE.

The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities, which are discussed in detail in its charter, include, among other duties, the responsibility to:

 

The Compensation Committee has the authority to establish one or more subcommittees which shall have the responsibilities and consist of those members of the Compensation Committee as the Compensation Committee may determine from time to time.

In its administration of the 2007 Amended and Restated Plan, the Compensation Committee has full authority in its discretion from time to time, and at any time, to select those officers and/or other personnel to whom awards will be granted, to determine the number of shares subject thereto, the times at which such awards shall be granted, the time at which the awards shall vest, and the terms and conditions of the agreements to be entered into by our officers. The full Board of Trustees is responsible for administering incentive grants to the Trustees. In determining the amount and terms of long-term incentive grants to be made to our named executive officers and other personnel other than Mr. Miller, the Compensation Committee relies heavily on the input and recommendations of Mr. Miller. See the section titled “Compensation Setting Process,” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this proxy statement for an additional discussion of the role of Mr. Miller in determining compensation.

In 2018, the Compensation Committee requested guidance from the human resource personnel of our Advisor, along with third-party validation of the accuracy and reasonableness of the compensation market review, with respect to the compensation for the named executive officers and Independent Trustees. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Trustee Compensation” included in this proxy statement for additional information.

Nominating & Governance Committee. The Nominating & Governance Committee met twice in 2018. The current members of this Committee are Robert F. McCadden, who serves as the Chairman, Gayle L. Capozzalo

34

---

 

and James P. Morey. The members of the Nominating & Governance Committee are independent pursuant to the applicable SEC rules and regulations and the listing standards of the NYSE.

The Nominating & Governance Committee was appointed by the Board of Trustees to: (1) assist the Board of Trustees by identifying individuals who are qualified, consistent with criteria approved by the Board of Trustees, to become Trustees, and to recommend to the Board of Trustees the Trustee nominees for the next annual meeting of shareholders; (2) develop and recommend to the Board of Trustees a set of governance principles in the form of corporate governance guidelines applicable to the Trust; (3) lead and oversee the Board of Trustees in its annual review of its performance and the performance of our management, and; (4) recommend to the Board Trustee nominees for each committee of the Board of Trustees. The Nominating & Governance Committee adopted our Governance Guidelines.

The Nominating & Governance Committee will consider Trustee nominees recommended by shareholders. Shareholders who wish to recommend a nominee for the Nominating & Governance Committee’s consideration may do so by submitting the individual’s name and qualifications to the Nominating & Governance Committee, Universal Health Realty Income Trust, c/o Secretary, Universal Corporate Center, 367 South Gulph Road, King of Prussia, PA 19406. Recommendations must be received by the Nominating & Governance Committee no later than the date by which shareholder proposals for presentation at the next annual meeting must be received, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. Recommended nominees will only be considered if there is a vacancy or if the Board of Trustees decides to increase the number of Trustees.

 

The Nominating & Governance Committee identifies and evaluates recommended nominees by considering, among other factors, the following minimum qualifications: the individual’s integrity, experience, education, expertise, independence and any other factors that the Board of Trustees and the Nominating & Governance Committee deem would enhance the effectiveness of the Board of Trustees and our governance.  The Board of Trustees believes that having Trustees of diverse gender, race, and ethnicity, along with varied skills and experiences, contributes to a balanced and effective Board. The Trust’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and Policies emphasize its commitment to a policy of inclusiveness and ensuring that the Nominating and Governance Committee, in performing its responsibilities to review trustee candidates and recommend candidates to the Board of Trustees for election, includes candidates with a diversity of ethnicity, race, gender and other personal characteristics in each pool of candidates from which Board of Trustee nominees are chosen. The Corporate Governance Guidelines and Policies are available on the Trust's website at: www.uhrit.com. The Nominating & Governance Committee will evaluate a nominee on the same basis if the individual is recommended by a shareholder. The Nominating & Governance Committee does not currently pay a fee to a third party to identify or evaluate nominees, but may consider from time to time engaging a search firm to identify trustee candidates.

Audit Committee. The Audit Committee met ten times in 2018. Current members of this Committee are Robert F. McCadden, who serves as the Chairman, Gayle L. Capozzalo and James P. Morey.

Our Board of Trustees has determined, in its business judgment, that each member of the Audit Committee qualifies as independent to the applicable SEC rules and regulations and the listing standards of the NYSE and is financially literate and that Robert F. McCadden qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under SEC regulations and has accounting or related financial management expertise.

The Audit Committee is responsible for providing assistance to the Board of Trustees in fulfilling its responsibilities relating to corporate accounting and reporting practices and in maintaining a direct line of communication between the Trustees and the independent registered public accounting firm. It appoints our

35

---

 

independent registered public accounting firm, reviews the scope and results of the audits with the independent registered public accounting firm and considers the adequacy of our internal accounting and control procedures.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Relationship with Universal Health Services, Inc.

Leases:    We commenced operations in 1986 by purchasing properties from certain subsidiaries of UHS and immediately leasing the properties back to the respective subsidiaries. Most of the leases were entered into at the time we commenced operations and provided for initial terms of 13 to 15 years with up to six additional 5-year renewal terms. The current base rentals and lease and renewal terms for each of the three hospital facilities leased to subsidiaries of UHS are provided below. The base rents are paid monthly and each lease also provides for additional or bonus rents which are computed and paid on a quarterly basis based upon a computation that compares current quarter revenue to a corresponding quarter in the base year. The three hospital leases with subsidiaries of UHS are unconditionally guaranteed by UHS and are cross-defaulted with one another.

The combined revenues generated from the leases on the UHS hospital facilities accounted for approximately 24% of our consolidated revenue for the five years ended December 31, 2018 (approximately 21%, 22% and 24% for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 respectively). In addition, we have seventeen MOBs, or free-standing emergency departments (“FEDs”), that are either wholly or jointly-owned by us, that include tenants which are subsidiaries of UHS.  The aggregate revenues generated from UHS-related tenants comprised approximately 32% of our consolidated revenue for the five years ended December 31, 2018 (approximately 30%, 32% and 33% for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively).

Pursuant to the Master Lease Document by and among us and certain subsidiaries of UHS, dated December 24, 1986 (the “Master Lease”), which governs the leases of all hospital properties with subsidiaries of UHS, UHS has the option to renew the leases at the lease terms described below by providing notice to us at least 90 days prior to the termination of the then current term. UHS also has the right to purchase the respective leased facilities at the end of the lease terms or any renewal terms at the appraised fair market value. In addition, the Master Lease, as amended during 2006, includes a change of control provision whereby UHS has the right, upon one month’s notice should a change of control of the Trust occur, to purchase any or all of the three leased hospital properties listed below at their appraised fair market value. Additionally, UHS has rights of first refusal to: (i) purchase the respective leased facilities during and for 180 days after the lease terms at the same price, terms and conditions of any third-party offer, or; (ii) renew the lease on the respective leased facility at the end of, and for 180 days after, the lease term at the same terms and conditions pursuant to any third-party offer.  

36

---

 

The table below details the existing lease terms and renewal options for our three acute care hospitals operated by wholly-owned subsidiaries of UHS:    

 

Management cannot predict whether the leases with subsidiaries of UHS, which have renewal options at existing lease rates or fair market value lease rates, or any of our other leases, will be renewed at the end of their lease term. If the leases are not renewed at their current rates or the fair market value lease rates, we would be required to find other operators for those facilities and/or enter into leases on terms potentially less favorable to us than the current leases. In addition, if subsidiaries of UHS exercise their options to purchase the respective leased hospital or FED facilities upon expiration of the lease terms, our future revenues could decrease if we were unable to earn a favorable rate of return on the sale proceeds received, as compared to the rental revenue currently earned pursuant to these leases.  

Officers and Employees:    Our officers are all employees of a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHS and although as of December 31, 2018 we had no salaried employees, our officers do typically receive annual stock-based compensation awards in the form of restricted stock. In special circumstances, if warranted and deemed appropriate by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees, our officers may also receive special compensation awards in the form of restricted stock and/or cash bonuses. There were no special compensation awards made in 2018, 2017 or 2016.

Advisory Agreement:    UHS of Delaware, Inc. (the “Advisor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHS, serves as Advisor to us under an advisory agreement dated December 24, 1986, and as amended and restated as of January 1, 2019 (the “Advisory Agreement”). Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor is obligated to present an investment program to us, to use its best efforts to obtain investments suitable for such program (although it is not obligated to present any particular investment opportunity to us), to provide administrative services to us and to conduct our day-to-day affairs. All transactions between us and UHS must be approved by the Trustees who are unaffiliated with UHS (the “Independent Trustees”). In performing its services under the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor may utilize independent professional services, including accounting, legal, tax and other services, for which the Advisor is reimbursed directly by us. The Advisory Agreement may be terminated for any reason upon sixty days written notice by us or the Advisor. The Advisory Agreement expires on December 31 of each year; however, it is renewable by us, subject to a determination by the Independent Trustees, that the Advisor’s performance has been satisfactory.

Pursuant to the terms of the original advisory agreement, which was in effect from inception through December 31, 2018, in addition to the advisory fee as discussed below, the Advisor was entitled to an annual incentive fee equal to 20% of the amount by which cash available for distribution to shareholders for each year, as defined in the agreement, exceeded 15% of our equity as shown on our consolidated balance sheet, determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles without reduction for return of capital dividends. Cash available for distribution to shareholders was defined as net cash flow from operations less deductions for, among

37

---

 

other things, amounts required to discharge our debt and liabilities and reserves for replacement and capital improvements to our properties and investments. Since the incentive fee requirements were not achieved at any time from our inception through December 31, 2018, no incentive fees were paid during that time. Given that the incentive fee requirements have never been achieved, and were deemed unlikely to be achieved in the future, the amended and restated advisory agreement that became effective on January 1, 2019, among other things, eliminated the incentive fee provision.  

Our advisory fee for 2018, 2017 and 2016 was computed at 0.70% of our average invested real estate assets, as derived from our consolidated balance sheet.  Based upon a review of our advisory fee and other general and administrative expenses, as compared to an industry peer group, the advisory fee computation remained unchanged for 2019, as compared to the last three years. The average real estate assets for advisory fee calculation purposes exclude certain items from our consolidated balance sheet such as, among other things, accumulated depreciation, cash and cash equivalents, base and bonus rent receivables, deferred charges and other assets. The advisory fee is payable quarterly, subject to adjustment at year-end based upon our audited financial statements. Advisory fees incurred and paid (or payable) to UHS amounted to $3.8 million during 2018, $3.6 million during 2017 and $3.3 million during 2016 and were based upon average invested real estate assets of $544 million, $511 million and $466 million during 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Share Ownership:    As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, UHS owned 5.7% of our outstanding shares of beneficial interest.

SEC reporting requirements of UHS:    UHS is subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and is required to file annual reports containing audited financial information and quarterly reports containing unaudited financial information. Since the aggregate revenues generated from UHS-related tenants comprised approximately 32% of our consolidated revenue for the five years ended December 31, 2018 (approximately 30%, 32% and 33% for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively), and since a subsidiary of UHS is our Advisor, you are encouraged to obtain the publicly available filings for Universal Health Services, Inc. from the SEC’s website. These filings are the sole responsibility of UHS and are not incorporated by reference herein.  

 

Review, Approval and Ratification of Related Party Transactions

Pursuant to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, all employees, officers and Trustees of the Trust, including family members and entities in which such persons have an interest (except any other publicly traded company in which such persons have less than a 5% interest) should avoid any relationship or financial interest which gives rise to an actual or potential conflict of interest between us and the employee, officer or Trustee. If an employee, officer or Trustee becomes aware of an actual or potential conflict of interest, he or she should promptly bring it to the attention of, and disclose all material facts to, one or more of a supervisor, a member of our legal staff, or the Chairperson of the Nominating & Governance Committee of the Board.

Pursuant to Section 4.9 of our Declaration of Trust, we may not engage in a transaction with any employee, officer, agent or Trustee of the Trust or with any employee, officer, agent or director of the Advisor, or any affiliate thereof except to the extent that such transaction has been approved or ratified by a majority of the Trustees who do not have an interest in the transaction. We may not engage in a transaction with our Advisor or any affiliate thereof (such as UHS) except to the extent that such transaction has been approved or ratified by a majority of the Independent Trustees. In approving or rejecting the proposed agreement, the Trustees will consider the relevant facts and circumstances available and deemed relevant, including but not limited to, the risks, costs, and benefits to us, the terms of the transactions, the availability of other sources for comparable services or

38

---

 

products, and, if applicable, the impact on Trustee independence. In general, the Trustees shall only approve those agreements that, in light of known circumstances, are in our best interests and that are fair and reasonable to us and our shareholders. For certain transactions with related persons, our Declaration of Trust requires that, based on an independent real estate appraiser, the total consideration is not in excess of the appraised value of the interest in the real property being acquired or disposed of, as applicable. If a transaction involves payments by us for services rendered (other than as Advisor, officer or Trustee), our Declaration of Trust requires that the payments made by us may not be in excess of payments made by third-parties to the related person for comparable services in the same geographic area and may not be in excess of fees charged by parties unrelated to us for comparable services in the same geographic area. All of our transactions with UHS and our Advisor were approved by a majority of our Independent Trustees.

39

---

 

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Board of Trustees is committed to the accuracy and integrity of the Trust’s financial reporting. The Audit Committee takes an involved and active role in delivering on this commitment.

The Audit Committee provides independent, objective oversight of our accounting functions and internal controls.

The Audit Committee reviews and evaluates, and discusses and consults with our management and the internal audit personnel and the independent registered public accounting firm about the following:

 

The Audit Committee acts under a written charter which was originally adopted by the Board of Trustees in 2004 and is reviewed and approved on an annual basis. The Audit Committee reviews, acts on and reports to the Board of Trustees with respect to various auditing, accounting, financial reporting, internal control and regulatory compliance matters. In discharging its oversight role, the Audit Committee may engage independent counsel and other advisers as it determines necessary. In accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Audit Committee also has the direct responsibility to select, evaluate, determine the compensation of, oversee, and where appropriate, replace our independent auditors, and has the authority to resolve disagreements between management and our auditors. The Audit Committee may establish procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Trust regarding accounting and auditing matters, as well as confidential, anonymous submission by employees. The Board of Trustees has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee is “independent” within the meaning of the rules of the NYSE and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

The Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Trustees that the consolidated financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Audit Committee took a number of steps in making this recommendation for 2018:

40

---

 

The Audit Committee reviewed our financial statements with the Board of Trustees and discussed them with KPMG LLP during the 2018 fiscal year, along with the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standard No. 16, Communications with Audit Committees, as amended, and as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. The Audit Committee received from KPMG LLP the written disclosures, including the letter, required by PCAOB 3524 and 3526 and discussed with KPMG LLP its independence.

Based on the discussions with KPMG LLP and management and the consolidated financial statement review, and such other matters deemed relevant and appropriate by the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Trustees that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed on February 27, 2019.

 

41

---

 

RELATIONSHIP WITH INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

KPMG LLP served as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2018 and 2017 fiscal years and has been selected to serve in that capacity for us for the 2019 fiscal year. It is anticipated that representatives of KPMG LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement, if they desire to do so, and to respond to any appropriate inquiries of the shareholders or their representatives.

Set forth below are the fees paid or accrued for the services of KPMG LLP during 2018 and 2017:

 

 

Audit fees for 2018 and 2017 consisted primarily of professional services rendered to us or various audits of limited liability companies in which we hold equity interests. Such audit services include audits of financial statements, audit of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting (as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), reviews of our quarterly financial statements, and audit services provided in connection with regulatory filings. Included in the 2018 audit fees were fees related to our 2018 acquisition. Included in the 2017 audit fees were services incurred in connection with an at-the-market equity issuance program as well as fees related to our 2017 acquisitions.

Tax fees for professional services rendered in 2018 and 2017 consisted primarily of the preparation of federal and state income tax returns and consultation on various tax matters related to us or limited liability companies in which we hold equity interests.

The Audit Committee has considered and determined that the provision of non-audit services by our principal auditor is compatible with maintaining auditor independence.

 

All audit and permissible non-audit services provided to us by the independent auditors are pre-approved by the Audit Committee, which considers whether the proposed services would impair the independence of the independent auditors. The Chairperson of the Audit Committee may pre-approve audit and permissible non-audit services during the time between Audit Committee meetings if the fees for the proposed services are less than $25,000.

42

---

 

YOU ARE URGED TO VOTE, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE OR VOTE YOUR PROXY BY TELEPHONE OR INTERNET AT YOUR EARLIEST CONVENIENCE, WHETHER OR NOT YOU CURRENTLY PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING IN PERSON.

 

King of Prussia, Pennsylvania

April 30, 2019

 

43

---

 

 

 

01 - Michael Allan Domb 02 - James P. Morey For Withhold 1 U P X Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. 02ZZMA Proposals — The Board of Trustees recommends a vote FOR the listed nominees in A Proposal 1, and FOR Proposals 2 and 3. 2. Advisory (nonbinding) vote to approve named executive officer compensation. 3. To ratify the selection of KPMG LLP, as the Trust’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019. 1. Election of Trustees: For Against Abstain The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Please sign exactly as name appears hereon. Each joint owner shall sign. Executors, administrators, trustees, etc. should give full title. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below Discretionary authority is hereby granted with respect to such other matters as may properly come before the meeting. WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DESIGNATED. IF NO CHOICE IS SPECIFIED, THE PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE NOMINEES LISTED IN PROPOSAL 1, AND FOR PROPOSALS 2 AND 3. IF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. Annual Meeting Proxy Card For Against Abstain You may vote online or by phone instead of mailing this card. Online Go to www.envisionreports.com/UHT or scan the QR code — login details are located in the shaded bar below. Save paper, time and money! Sign up for electronic delivery at www.envisionreports.com/UHT Phone Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories and Canada Votes submitted electronically must be received by 1:00 a.m., Central Time, on June 12, 2019. Your vote matters – here’s how to vote!

 

 

---

 

 

 

Small steps make an impact.Help the environment by consenting to receive electronicdelivery, sign up at www.envisionreports.com/UHT This Proxy is Solicited By The Board of Trustees For The Annual Meeting of ShareholdersTo Be Held on June 12, 2019 Alan B. Miller and Cheryl K. Ramagano, and each of them, as the true and lawful attorneys, agents and proxies of the undersigned, with full power ofsubstitution, are hereby authorized to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side, all shares of Universal Health Realty Income Trust (the“Trust”) held of record by the undersigned on April 15, 2019 at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at 10:00 a.m., on Wednesday, June 12, 2019 at the offices of the Trust at Universal Corporate Center, 367 South Gulph Road, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania and at any adjournment thereof. Any and all proxiesheretofore given are hereby revoked. (This proxy is continued on reverse side) PLEASE SIGN ON REVERSE SIDE AND RETURN PROMPTLY Proxy — Universal Health Realty Income Trust IF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE .Non-Voting Items Meeting Attendance Mark box to the right if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. Change of Address — Please print new address below.