e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
x |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 1-1169
THE TIMKEN COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
OHIO
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
34-0577130
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1835 Dueber Ave., SW, Canton, OH
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
44706-2798
(Zip Code) |
330.438.3000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [ x ]
No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and
posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes [ ]
No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer [ x ]
|
|
Accelerated filer [ ]
|
|
Non-accelerated filer [ ]
|
|
Smaller reporting company [ ] |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [ ]
No [ x ]
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Common Stock, without par value
|
|
96,817,639 shares |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
THE TIMKEN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statement of Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
828,927 |
|
|
$ |
1,535,549 |
|
|
$ |
1,789,305 |
|
|
$ |
2,970,219 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
710,092 |
|
|
|
1,191,805 |
|
|
|
1,518,344 |
|
|
|
2,314,938 |
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
|
118,835 |
|
|
|
343,744 |
|
|
|
270,961 |
|
|
|
655,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, administrative and general expenses |
|
|
142,315 |
|
|
|
196,603 |
|
|
|
281,311 |
|
|
|
374,549 |
|
Impairment and restructuring charges |
|
|
54,915 |
|
|
|
1,807 |
|
|
|
69,659 |
|
|
|
4,683 |
|
Gain on divestitures |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
Operating (Loss) Income |
|
|
(78,395 |
) |
|
|
145,334 |
|
|
|
(80,009 |
) |
|
|
276,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(8,491 |
) |
|
|
(11,643 |
) |
|
|
(16,965 |
) |
|
|
(22,641 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
1,515 |
|
|
|
939 |
|
|
|
2,913 |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
(573 |
) |
|
|
(701 |
) |
|
|
6,895 |
|
|
|
14,766 |
|
|
(Loss) Income before Income Taxes |
|
|
(86,910 |
) |
|
|
134,505 |
|
|
|
(89,140 |
) |
|
|
271,095 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
(23,040 |
) |
|
|
44,584 |
|
|
|
(20,192 |
) |
|
|
95,824 |
|
|
Net (Loss) Income |
|
|
(63,870 |
) |
|
|
89,921 |
|
|
|
(68,948 |
) |
|
|
175,271 |
|
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
978 |
|
|
|
(5,301 |
) |
|
|
1,863 |
|
|
Net (Loss) Income Attributable to The Timken Company |
|
$ |
(64,517 |
) |
|
$ |
88,943 |
|
|
$ |
(63,647 |
) |
|
$ |
173,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Loss) Income per Common Share Attributable to The Timken
Company Common Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share |
|
$ |
(0.67 |
) |
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
$ |
(0.66 |
) |
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share |
|
$ |
(0.67 |
) |
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
$ |
(0.66 |
) |
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per share |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
277,086 |
|
|
$ |
133,383 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowances: 2009 - $62,766; 2008 - $56,459 |
|
|
465,068 |
|
|
|
609,397 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
930,141 |
|
|
|
1,145,695 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
84,830 |
|
|
|
83,438 |
|
Deferred charges and prepaid expenses |
|
|
15,806 |
|
|
|
11,066 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
45,846 |
|
|
|
50,486 |
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
1,818,777 |
|
|
|
2,033,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment - Net |
|
|
1,653,212 |
|
|
|
1,743,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
229,699 |
|
|
|
230,049 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
166,264 |
|
|
|
173,704 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
312,782 |
|
|
|
314,960 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
41,421 |
|
|
|
40,006 |
|
|
Total Other Assets |
|
|
750,166 |
|
|
|
758,719 |
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
4,222,155 |
|
|
$ |
4,536,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
68,404 |
|
|
$ |
91,482 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
316,284 |
|
|
|
443,430 |
|
Salaries, wages and benefits |
|
|
146,608 |
|
|
|
218,695 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
22,467 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
5,186 |
|
|
|
5,131 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
269,293 |
|
|
|
17,108 |
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
805,775 |
|
|
|
798,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
254,845 |
|
|
|
515,250 |
|
Accrued pension cost |
|
|
844,333 |
|
|
|
844,045 |
|
Accrued postretirement benefits cost |
|
|
609,038 |
|
|
|
613,045 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
9,921 |
|
|
|
10,388 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
97,096 |
|
|
|
91,971 |
|
|
Total Non-Current Liabilities |
|
|
1,815,233 |
|
|
|
2,074,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class I and II Serial Preferred Stock without par value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized - 10,000,000 shares each class, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock without par value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized - 200,000,000 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued (including shares in treasury) (2009 - 96,980,935 shares;
2008 - 96,891,501 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stated capital |
|
|
53,064 |
|
|
|
53,064 |
|
Other paid-in capital |
|
|
835,473 |
|
|
|
838,315 |
|
Earnings invested in the business |
|
|
1,490,299 |
|
|
|
1,580,084 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(791,226 |
) |
|
|
(819,633 |
) |
Treasury shares at cost (2009 - 163,296 shares; 2008 - 344,948 shares) |
|
|
(4,206 |
) |
|
|
(11,586 |
) |
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
|
1,583,404 |
|
|
|
1,640,244 |
|
|
Noncontrolling Interest |
|
|
17,743 |
|
|
|
22,794 |
|
|
Total Equity |
|
|
1,601,147 |
|
|
|
1,663,038 |
|
|
Total Liabilities and Equity |
|
$ |
4,222,155 |
|
|
$ |
4,536,050 |
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH PROVIDED (USED) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to The Timken Company |
|
$ |
(63,647 |
) |
|
$ |
173,408 |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(5,301 |
) |
|
|
1,863 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
116,949 |
|
|
|
117,080 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
35,630 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
Loss (gain) on disposals of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
1,416 |
|
|
|
(15,452 |
) |
Deferred income tax (benefit) provision |
|
|
(758 |
) |
|
|
2,001 |
|
Stock based compensation expense |
|
|
8,222 |
|
|
|
9,572 |
|
Pension and other postretirement expense |
|
|
49,050 |
|
|
|
43,940 |
|
Pension and other postretirement benefit payments |
|
|
(35,472 |
) |
|
|
(41,781 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
148,134 |
|
|
|
(132,793 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
228,005 |
|
|
|
(122,050 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(231,109 |
) |
|
|
52,116 |
|
Other - net |
|
|
2,325 |
|
|
|
2,450 |
|
|
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities |
|
|
253,444 |
|
|
|
90,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(54,618 |
) |
|
|
(127,447 |
) |
Proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
3,880 |
|
|
|
29,741 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
(353 |
) |
|
|
(56,906 |
) |
Other |
|
|
1,896 |
|
|
|
(1,606 |
) |
|
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities |
|
|
(49,195 |
) |
|
|
(156,218 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid to shareholders |
|
|
(26,138 |
) |
|
|
(32,709 |
) |
Net proceeds from common share activity |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
15,708 |
|
Accounts receivable securitization financing borrowings |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
210,000 |
|
Accounts receivable securitization financing payments |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(45,000 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
631,303 |
|
Payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(10,259 |
) |
|
|
(662,689 |
) |
Short-term debt activity - net |
|
|
(32,100 |
) |
|
|
(6,474 |
) |
|
Net Cash (Used) Provided by Financing Activities |
|
|
(68,497 |
) |
|
|
110,139 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
7,951 |
|
|
|
5,920 |
|
|
Increase In Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
143,703 |
|
|
|
50,557 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
133,383 |
|
|
|
42,884 |
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
277,086 |
|
|
$ |
93,441 |
|
|
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) for The Timken Company (the
Company) have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all
of the information and footnotes required by the accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments
(consisting of normal recurring accruals) and disclosures considered necessary for a fair
presentation have been included. For further information, refer to the Consolidated Financial
Statements and footnotes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008. Certain amounts in the 2008 Consolidated Financial Statements have been
reclassified to conform to the 2009 presentation.
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company evaluated the classification of its investments held
by the Companys operations in India and concluded that a portion of these investments should
be considered Cash and cash equivalents on the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Companys
conclusion was based on the short-term and highly-liquid nature of the investments. At December
31, 2008, the Company held $23,640 of investments, of which $17,077 has been reclassified from
Other current assets to Cash and cash equivalents to conform to the 2009 presentation for these
investments.
Management has evaluated and disclosed all material events occurring subsequent to the date of the
financial statements up to August 5, 2009, the filing date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
Note 2 New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (SFAS No. 157), Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157
establishes a framework for measuring fair value that is based on the assumptions market
participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy
that prioritizes the information to develop those assumptions. Additionally, the standard expands
the disclosures about fair value measurements to include separately disclosing the fair value
measurements of assets or liabilities within each level of the fair value hierarchy. In February
2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No.
157. FSP FAS 157-2 delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. On January 1, 2009, the
Company implemented the previously delayed provisions of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities recorded at fair value, as required. The implementation of SFAS No. 157
for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities did not have a material impact on the
Companys results of operations and financial condition.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS No.
141(R)). SFAS No. 141(R) provides revised guidance on how acquirers recognize and measure the
consideration transferred, identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, noncontrolling
interests and goodwill acquired in a business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) also expands required
disclosures surrounding the nature and financial effects of business combinations. SFAS No. 141(R)
is effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The
implementation of SFAS No. 141(R), effective January 1, 2009, did not have a material impact on the
Companys results of operations and financial condition.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51. SFAS No. 160 establishes requirements for ownership
interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the Company (sometimes called minority
interests) to be clearly identified, presented, and disclosed in the consolidated statement of
financial position within equity, but separate from the parents equity. All changes in the
parents ownership interests are required to be accounted for consistently as equity transactions
and any noncontrolling equity investments in deconsolidated subsidiaries must be measured initially
at fair value. SFAS No. 160 is effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008. However, presentation and disclosure requirements must be retrospectively
applied to comparative financial statements. The implementation of SFAS No. 160, effective January
1, 2009, did not have a material impact on the Companys results of operations and financial
condition.
5
Note 2 New Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS No. 161 requires entities to
provide greater transparency through additional disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses
derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for
under SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and its related
interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys
financial position, results of operations and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The
implementation of SFAS No. 161, effective January 1, 2009, expanded the disclosures on derivative
instruments and related hedged items and did not have a material impact on the Companys results of
operations and financial condition. See Note 16 Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
for the expanded disclosures.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in
Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities. FSP No. EITF 03-6-1 clarifies that
unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to receive nonforfeitable dividends are
participating securities. FSP No. EITF 03-6-1 provides guidance on how to allocate earnings to
participating securities and compute earnings per share using the two-class method. FSP No. EITF
03-6-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2008, and interim periods within
those fiscal years. FSP No. EITF 03-6-1 did not have a material impact on the Companys disclosure
of earnings per share. See Note 10 Earnings Per Share for the computation of earnings per share
using the two-class method.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1, Employers Disclosures about Postretirement
Benefit Plan Assets. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 requires the disclosure of additional information about
investment allocation, fair values of major categories of assets, development of fair value
measurements and concentrations of risk. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 is effective for fiscal years ending
after December 15, 2009. The adoption of FSP FAS 132(R)-1 is not expected to have a material impact
on the Companys results of operations and financial condition.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events. SFAS No. 165 establishes general
standards of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but
before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS No. 165 is effective
for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009 and was adopted by the Company
in the second quarter of 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 165 did not have a material impact on the
Companys results of operations and financial condition.
Note 3 Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Inventories: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing supplies |
|
$ |
82,636 |
|
|
$ |
89,070 |
|
Work in process and raw materials |
|
|
357,954 |
|
|
|
474,906 |
|
Finished products |
|
|
489,551 |
|
|
|
581,719 |
|
|
Inventories - net |
|
$ |
930,141 |
|
|
$ |
1,145,695 |
|
|
An actual valuation of the inventory under the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method can be made only at
the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim
LIFO calculations must be based on managements estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and
costs. Because these are subject to many factors beyond managements control, annual results may
differ from interim results as they are subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation.
The LIFO reserve at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $294,273 and $307,544, respectively.
The Companys Steel segment recognized a decrease in its LIFO reserve of $3,805 and $16,188,
respectively, during the second quarter and first six months of 2009 as a result of expected lower
year-end inventory quantities and material costs, especially scrap steel costs. The decrease in
the Companys Steel segment LIFO reserve for the respective periods of 2009 compares to an increase
in the LIFO reserve of $28,639 and $45,239, respectively, during the second quarter and first six
months of 2008.
6
Note 4 Property, Plant and Equipment
The components of property, plant and equipment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and buildings |
|
$ |
720,639 |
|
|
$ |
705,701 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
3,346,047 |
|
|
|
3,323,695 |
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
4,066,686 |
|
|
|
4,029,396 |
|
Less allowances for depreciation |
|
|
(2,413,474 |
) |
|
|
(2,285,530 |
) |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment - net |
|
$ |
1,653,212 |
|
|
$ |
1,743,866 |
|
|
At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, machinery and equipment included approximately $125,400 and
$128,800, respectively, of capitalized software. Depreciation expense for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $55,675 and $55,986, respectively. Depreciation expense for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $109,622 and $109,981, respectively. Depreciation expense
on capitalized software for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $5,800
and $4,400, respectively. Depreciation expense on capitalized software for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $10,900 and $8,800, respectively.
There were no assets held for sale at June 30, 2009 compared to $7,020 at December 31, 2008. In
January 2009, the Company sold one of the buildings at its former office complex in Torrington,
Connecticut and recognized a pretax gain of $1,322. On July 20, 2009, the Company sold the
remaining portion of this office complex. In anticipation of the loss that the Company expected to
record upon completion of the sale of the office complex, the Company recorded an impairment of
$6,376 during the second quarter of 2009. The Company expects to incur a pretax loss of
approximately $800 upon completion of this transaction. This former office complex was classified
as assets held for sale at December 31, 2008.
On February 15, 2008, the Company completed the sale of its former seamless steel tube
manufacturing facility located in Desford, England for approximately $28,400. The Company
recognized a pretax gain of approximately $20,200 during the first quarter of 2008 and recorded the
gain in Other income (expense), net in the Companys Consolidated Statement of Income.
Note 5 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2009 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Process Industries |
|
$ |
52,856 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(567 |
) |
|
$ |
52,289 |
|
Aerospace and Defense |
|
|
167,558 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
167,769 |
|
Steel |
|
|
9,635 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
9,641 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
230,049 |
|
|
$ |
353 |
|
|
$ |
(703 |
) |
|
$ |
229,699 |
|
|
Acquisitions represent opening balance sheet allocation adjustments for acquisitions completed in
2008. Other primarily includes foreign currency translation adjustments.
7
Note 5 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (continued)
The following table displays intangible assets as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009 |
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
101,098 |
|
|
$ |
19,155 |
|
|
$ |
81,943 |
|
|
$ |
101,098 |
|
|
$ |
16,470 |
|
|
$ |
84,628 |
|
Engineering drawings |
|
|
5,001 |
|
|
|
5,001 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,001 |
|
|
|
5,001 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Know-how |
|
|
2,104 |
|
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
1,266 |
|
|
|
2,122 |
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
1,338 |
|
Land-use rights |
|
|
7,643 |
|
|
|
2,961 |
|
|
|
4,682 |
|
|
|
7,508 |
|
|
|
2,593 |
|
|
|
4,915 |
|
Patents |
|
|
22,729 |
|
|
|
15,396 |
|
|
|
7,333 |
|
|
|
22,729 |
|
|
|
14,101 |
|
|
|
8,628 |
|
Technology use |
|
|
46,445 |
|
|
|
8,989 |
|
|
|
37,456 |
|
|
|
46,120 |
|
|
|
7,298 |
|
|
|
38,822 |
|
Trademarks |
|
|
6,517 |
|
|
|
4,718 |
|
|
|
1,799 |
|
|
|
6,632 |
|
|
|
4,670 |
|
|
|
1,962 |
|
PMA licenses |
|
|
8,792 |
|
|
|
1,980 |
|
|
|
6,812 |
|
|
|
8,792 |
|
|
|
1,753 |
|
|
|
7,039 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
2,710 |
|
|
|
846 |
|
|
|
1,864 |
|
|
|
2,710 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
2,217 |
|
Unpatented technology |
|
|
18,425 |
|
|
|
11,900 |
|
|
|
6,525 |
|
|
|
18,425 |
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
7,425 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
221,464 |
|
|
$ |
71,784 |
|
|
$ |
149,680 |
|
|
$ |
221,137 |
|
|
$ |
64,163 |
|
|
$ |
156,974 |
|
|
Intangible assets not subject to amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
229,699 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
229,699 |
|
|
$ |
230,049 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
230,049 |
|
Tradename |
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
Land-use rights |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
146 |
|
Industrial license agreements |
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
964 |
|
FAA air agency certificates |
|
|
14,220 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
14,220 |
|
|
|
14,220 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
14,220 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
246,283 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
246,283 |
|
|
$ |
246,779 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
246,779 |
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
$ |
467,747 |
|
|
$ |
71,784 |
|
|
$ |
395,963 |
|
|
$ |
467,916 |
|
|
$ |
64,163 |
|
|
$ |
403,753 |
|
|
Amortization expense for intangible assets was approximately $3,760 and $7,230, respectively, for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. Amortization expense for intangible assets is
estimated to be approximately $14,900 for 2009; $14,600 in 2010; $13,600 in 2011; $13,000 in 2012
and $9,900 in 2013.
Note 6 Equity Investments
The Companys investments in less than majority-owned companies in which it has the ability to
exercise significant influence are accounted for using the equity method except for when they
qualify as variable interest entities and are consolidated in accordance with FASB Interpretation
No. 46 (revised December 2003) (FIN 46(R)), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an
interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51.
Equity investments are reviewed for impairment when circumstances (such as lower-than-expected
financial performance or change in strategic direction) indicate that the carrying value of the
investment may not be recoverable. If impairment does exist, the equity investment is written down
to its fair value with a corresponding charge to the Consolidated Statement of Income. No
impairments were recorded during the first six months of 2009 and 2008 relating to the Companys
equity investments.
Investments accounted for under the equity method were $13,911 and $13,634 at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008,
respectively, and were reported in Other non-current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
8
Note 6 Equity Investments (continued)
The Companys Mobile Industries segment has a joint venture with Advanced Green Components, LLC
(AGC). AGC is engaged in the business of converting steel to machined rings for tapered bearings
and other related products. During the third quarter of 2006, AGC refinanced its long-term debt of
$12,240. The Company guaranteed half of this obligation. The Company concluded the refinancing
represented a reconsideration event to evaluate whether AGC was a variable interest entity under
FIN 46(R). The Company concluded that AGC was a variable interest entity and that the Company was
the primary beneficiary. Therefore, the Company consolidated AGC, effective September 30, 2006.
At June 30, 2009, net assets of AGC were $1,942, primarily consisting of the following: inventory
of $5,876; property, plant and equipment of $21,231; short-term and long-term debt of $18,085; and
other non-current liabilities of $7,365. All of AGCs assets are collateral for its obligations.
Except for AGCs indebtedness for which the Company is a guarantor, AGCs creditors have no
recourse to the general credit of the Company.
The Company has no other variable interest entities, other than AGC, for which it is a primary
beneficiary.
Note 7 Financing Arrangements
Short-term debt at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Variable-rate lines of credit for certain of the Companys foreign subsidiaries
with various banks with interest rates ranging from 1.20% to 11.75% |
|
$ |
68,404 |
|
|
$ |
91,482 |
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
68,404 |
|
|
$ |
91,482 |
|
|
The lines of credit for certain of the Companys foreign subsidiaries provide for borrowings up to
$370,823. At June 30, 2009, the Company had borrowings outstanding of $68,404, which reduced the
availability under these facilities to $302,419.
The Company has a $175,000 Accounts Receivable Securitization Financing Agreement (Asset
Securitization Agreement), renewable every 364 days. Under the terms of the Asset Securitization
Agreement, which expires on December 18, 2009, the Company sells, on an ongoing basis, certain
domestic trade receivables to Timken Receivables Corporation, a wholly-owned consolidated
subsidiary that in turn uses the trade receivables to secure borrowings, which are funded through a
vehicle that issues commercial paper in the short-term market. Borrowings under the agreement are
limited to certain borrowing base calculations. Any amounts outstanding under this Asset
Securitization Agreement would be reported on the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet in
Short-term debt. As of June 30, 2009, there were no outstanding borrowings under the Asset
Securitization Agreement. Although the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the Asset
Securitization Agreement as of June 30, 2009, certain borrowing base limitations reduced the
availability under the Asset Securitization Agreement to $75,425. The yield on the commercial
paper, which is the commercial paper rate plus program fees, is considered a financing cost and is
included in Interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
9
Note 7 Financing Arrangements (continued)
Long-term debt at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Fixed-rate Medium-Term Notes, Series A, due at various dates through
May 2028, with interest rates ranging from 6.74% to 7.76% |
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
Variable-rate State of Ohio Water Development
Revenue Refunding Bonds, maturing on November 1, 2025
(0.45% at June 30, 2009) |
|
|
12,200 |
|
|
|
12,200 |
|
Variable-rate State of Ohio Air Quality Development
Revenue Refunding Bonds, maturing on November 1, 2025
(1.42% at June 30, 2009) |
|
|
9,500 |
|
|
|
9,500 |
|
Variable-rate State of Ohio Pollution Control Revenue Refunding
Bonds, maturing on June 1, 2033 (1.09% at June 30, 2009) |
|
|
17,000 |
|
|
|
17,000 |
|
Variable-rate Unsecured Canadian Note, maturing on December 22, 2010
(1.01% at June 30, 2009) |
|
|
39,816 |
|
|
|
47,104 |
|
Fixed-rate Unsecured Notes, maturing on February 15, 2010 with an interest rate of 5.75% |
|
|
251,769 |
|
|
|
252,357 |
|
Variable-rate credit facility with US Bank for Advanced Green Components, LLC,
maturing on July 17, 2009 (1.48% at June 30, 2009) |
|
|
12,240 |
|
|
|
12,240 |
|
Other |
|
|
6,613 |
|
|
|
6,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
524,138 |
|
|
|
532,358 |
|
Less current maturities |
|
|
269,293 |
|
|
|
17,108 |
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
254,845 |
|
|
$ |
515,250 |
|
|
At June 30, 2009, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under its then existing $500,000
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (former Senior Credit Facility) but had letters of credit
outstanding totaling $39,243, which reduced the availability under
the former Senior Credit Facility to
$460,757. Under the former Senior Credit Facility, the Company had two financial covenants: a
consolidated leverage ratio and a consolidated interest coverage ratio. At June 30, 2009, the
Company was in full compliance with the covenants under the former Senior Credit Facility and its
other debt agreements.
On July 10, 2009, the Company entered into a new $500 million Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
(new Senior Credit Facility). This new Senior Credit Facility matures on July 10, 2012. Under the
new Senior Credit Facility, the Company has three financial covenants: a consolidated leverage
ratio, a consolidated interest coverage ratio and a consolidated minimum tangible net worth test.
These covenants are effective with the Companys third quarter ending September 30, 2009.
In December 2005, the Company entered into an unsecured loan in Canada. The principal balance of
the loan is payable in full on December 22, 2010. The interest rate is variable based on the
Canadian LIBOR rate and interest payments are due quarterly. The Company repaid a portion of this
loan in June 2009 and repaid the remaining balance on July 10, 2009.
The Company is the guarantor of $6,120 of AGCs $12,240 credit facility. Refer to Note 6 Equity
Investments for additional discussion. Effective as of July 17, 2009, AGC renewed its $12,240
credit facility with US Bank for another 365 days. The Company continues to guarantee half of this
obligation.
10
Note 8 Product Warranty
The Company provides limited warranties on certain of its products. The Company accrues
liabilities for warranty based upon specific claims and a review of historical warranty claim
experience in accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies. Should the Company
become aware of a specific potential warranty claim for which liability is probable and reasonably
estimable, a specific charge is recorded and accounted for accordingly. Adjustments are made
quarterly to the accruals as claim data and historical experience change. The following is a
rollforward of the warranty accruals for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and the twelve months
ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Beginning balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
13,515 |
|
|
$ |
12,571 |
|
Expense |
|
|
3,779 |
|
|
|
7,525 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(6,123 |
) |
|
|
(6,581 |
) |
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
11,171 |
|
|
$ |
13,515 |
|
|
The product warranty accrual at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was included in Accounts
payable and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Note 9 Equity
An analysis of the change in capital and earnings invested in the business for the six months ended June 30, 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Timken Company Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Invested |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stated |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
in the |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Business |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,663,038 |
|
|
$ |
53,064 |
|
|
$ |
838,315 |
|
|
$ |
1,580,084 |
|
|
$ |
(819,633 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,586 |
) |
|
$ |
22,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
(68,948 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63,647 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,301 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
22,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and postretirement liability adjustment
(net of income tax of $8,143) |
|
|
6,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on marketable securities
(net of income tax of $35) |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Change in fair value of derivative financial
instruments, net of reclassifications |
|
|
(1,059 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,059 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
(40,528 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital investment of Timken XEMC (Hunan)
Bearings Co. |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
Dividends declared to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(763 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(763 |
) |
Dividends - $0.27 per share |
|
|
(26,138 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,138 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of 181,652 shares from treasury
and 89,434 shares from authorized |
|
|
4,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,842 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,601,147 |
|
|
$ |
53,064 |
|
|
$ |
835,473 |
|
|
$ |
1,490,299 |
|
|
$ |
(791,226 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,206 |
) |
|
$ |
17,743 |
|
|
The total comprehensive loss for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was $840. The total comprehensive income for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008 was $108,862 and $230,444, respectively.
11
Note 10 Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of the numerator and the denominator of basic
earnings per share and diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Earnings per share - Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to The Timken Company |
|
$ |
(64,517 |
) |
|
$ |
88,943 |
|
|
$ |
(63,647 |
) |
|
$ |
173,408 |
|
Less: distributed and undistributed earnings allocated to nonvested stock |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,206 |
) |
|
Net (loss) income attributable to common shareholders - basic |
|
|
(64,517 |
) |
|
|
88,343 |
|
|
|
(63,647 |
) |
|
|
172,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding - basic |
|
|
96,147,809 |
|
|
|
95,604,374 |
|
|
|
96,082,491 |
|
|
|
95,440,281 |
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share |
|
$ |
(0.67 |
) |
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
$ |
(0.66 |
) |
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share - Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to The Timken Company |
|
$ |
(64,517 |
) |
|
$ |
88,943 |
|
|
$ |
(63,647 |
) |
|
$ |
173,408 |
|
Less: distributed and undistributed earnings
allocated to nonvested stock |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,206 |
) |
|
Net (loss) income attributable to common shareholders - diluted |
|
|
(64,517 |
) |
|
|
88,343 |
|
|
|
(63,647 |
) |
|
|
172,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding - basic |
|
|
96,147,809 |
|
|
|
95,604,374 |
|
|
|
96,082,491 |
|
|
|
95,440,281 |
|
Effect of dilutive options |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
564,810 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
479,282 |
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding,
assuming dilution of stock options |
|
|
96,147,809 |
|
|
|
96,169,184 |
|
|
|
96,082,491 |
|
|
|
95,919,563 |
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share |
|
$ |
(0.67 |
) |
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
$ |
(0.66 |
) |
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
|
In periods in which a net loss has occurred, as is the case for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009, the dilutive effect of stock options is not recognized and thus is not utilized in
the calculation of dilutive earnings per share.
The exercise prices for certain stock options that the Company has awarded exceed the average
market price of the Companys common stock. Such stock options are antidilutive and were not
included in the computation of diluted earnings per share. The antidilutive stock options
outstanding were 4,129,493 and zero for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The antidilutive stock options outstanding were 4,533,820 and 784,510 for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
12
Note 11 Segment Information
The primary measurement used by management to measure the financial performance of each segment
is adjusted EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes, excluding the effect of amounts related to
certain items that management considers not representative of ongoing operations such as impairment
and restructuring, manufacturing rationalization and integration costs, one-time gains and losses
on disposal of non-strategic assets, allocated receipts received or payments made under the U.S.
Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (CDSOA) and gains and losses on the dissolution of
subsidiaries).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales to external customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Industries |
|
$ |
365,740 |
|
|
$ |
628,238 |
|
|
$ |
738,604 |
|
|
$ |
1,263,490 |
|
Process Industries |
|
|
221,010 |
|
|
|
327,504 |
|
|
|
463,294 |
|
|
|
639,716 |
|
Aerospace and Defense |
|
|
113,165 |
|
|
|
105,676 |
|
|
|
225,830 |
|
|
|
207,808 |
|
Steel |
|
|
129,012 |
|
|
|
474,131 |
|
|
|
361,577 |
|
|
|
859,205 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
828,927 |
|
|
$ |
1,535,549 |
|
|
$ |
1,789,305 |
|
|
$ |
2,970,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Process Industries |
|
$ |
700 |
|
|
$ |
869 |
|
|
$ |
1,622 |
|
|
$ |
1,279 |
|
Steel |
|
|
5,823 |
|
|
|
44,797 |
|
|
|
21,826 |
|
|
|
84,711 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,523 |
|
|
$ |
45,666 |
|
|
$ |
23,448 |
|
|
$ |
85,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment EBIT, as adjusted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Industries |
|
$ |
(36,396 |
) |
|
$ |
13,968 |
|
|
$ |
(61,275 |
) |
|
$ |
44,535 |
|
Process Industries |
|
|
37,586 |
|
|
|
62,803 |
|
|
|
84,603 |
|
|
|
121,840 |
|
Aerospace and Defense |
|
|
19,504 |
|
|
|
12,111 |
|
|
|
38,057 |
|
|
|
19,273 |
|
Steel |
|
|
(32,907 |
) |
|
|
80,318 |
|
|
|
(40,169 |
) |
|
|
133,697 |
|
|
Total EBIT, as adjusted, for reportable segments |
|
|
(12,213 |
) |
|
|
169,200 |
|
|
|
21,216 |
|
|
|
319,345 |
|
|
Unallocated corporate expense |
|
|
(13,187 |
) |
|
|
(19,303 |
) |
|
|
(25,517 |
) |
|
|
(35,728 |
) |
Impairment and restructuring |
|
|
(54,915 |
) |
|
|
(1,807 |
) |
|
|
(69,659 |
) |
|
|
(4,683 |
) |
Gain on divestitures |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Rationalization and integration charges |
|
|
(2,418 |
) |
|
|
(2,119 |
) |
|
|
(3,883 |
) |
|
|
(4,301 |
) |
Gain on sale of non-strategic assets, net of
dissolution of subsidiary |
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
1,979 |
|
|
|
20,545 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(8,491 |
) |
|
|
(11,643 |
) |
|
|
(16,965 |
) |
|
|
(22,640 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
1,515 |
|
|
|
939 |
|
|
|
2,912 |
|
Intersegment eliminations |
|
|
3,008 |
|
|
|
(1,529 |
) |
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
|
(4,363 |
) |
|
(Loss) Income before Income Taxes |
|
$ |
(86,910 |
) |
|
$ |
134,505 |
|
|
$ |
(89,140 |
) |
|
$ |
271,095 |
|
|
Intersegment sales represent sales between the segments. These sales are eliminated upon
consolidation.
13
Note 12 Impairment and Restructuring Charges
Impairment and restructuring charges by segment are comprised of the following:
For the three months ended June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile |
|
|
Process |
|
|
Aerospace and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries |
|
|
Industries |
|
|
Defense |
|
|
Steel |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges |
|
$ |
2,833 |
|
|
$ |
26,890 |
|
|
$ |
1,984 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
31,707 |
|
Severance expense
and related benefit
costs |
|
|
12,935 |
|
|
|
3,883 |
|
|
|
1,448 |
|
|
|
2,758 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
21,684 |
|
Exit costs |
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,524 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
16,558 |
|
|
$ |
31,507 |
|
|
$ |
3,432 |
|
|
$ |
2,758 |
|
|
$ |
660 |
|
|
$ |
54,915 |
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
Mobile |
|
|
Process |
|
|
Aerospace and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries |
|
|
Industries |
|
|
Defense |
|
|
Steel |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges |
|
$ |
3,730 |
|
|
$ |
29,916 |
|
|
$ |
1,984 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
35,630 |
|
Severance expense and related benefit costs |
|
|
20,529 |
|
|
|
4,842 |
|
|
|
1,502 |
|
|
|
3,204 |
|
|
|
1,860 |
|
|
|
31,937 |
|
Exit costs |
|
|
794 |
|
|
|
1,297 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,092 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
25,053 |
|
|
$ |
36,055 |
|
|
$ |
3,486 |
|
|
$ |
3,205 |
|
|
$ |
1,860 |
|
|
$ |
69,659 |
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
Mobile |
|
|
Process |
|
|
Aerospace and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries |
|
|
Industries |
|
|
Defense |
|
|
Steel |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Severance expense and related benefit costs |
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
470 |
|
Exit costs |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
1,343 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,337 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
425 |
|
|
$ |
1,343 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,807 |
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
Mobile |
|
|
Process |
|
|
Aerospace and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries |
|
|
Industries |
|
|
Defense |
|
|
Steel |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges |
|
$ |
310 |
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
362 |
|
Severance expense and related benefit costs |
|
|
2,564 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,564 |
|
Exit costs |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
1,431 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,757 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,836 |
|
|
$ |
1,483 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
364 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
4,683 |
|
|
The following discussion explains the major impairment and restructuring charges recorded for the
periods presented; however, it is not intended to reflect a comprehensive discussion of all amounts
in the tables above.
14
Note 12 Impairment and Restructuring Charges (continued)
Selling and Administrative Reductions
In March 2009, the Company announced the realignment of its organization to improve efficiency and
reduce costs as a result of the economic downturn. The Company initially targeted pretax savings
of approximately $30,000 to $40,000 in annual selling and administrative costs. In April 2009, in
light of the Companys revised forecast indicating significantly reduced sales and earnings for the
year, the Company expanded the target to approximately $80,000. The implementation of these
savings began in the first quarter of 2009 and is expected to be significantly completed by the end
of the fourth quarter of 2009, with full-year savings expected to be achieved in 2010. As the
Company streamlines its operating structure, it expects to cut its sales and administrative
associate workforce by up to 400 positions in 2009, incurring severance costs of approximately
$15,000 to $20,000. During the second quarter and first six months of 2009, the Company recognized
$8,994 and $11,301, respectively, of severance and related benefit costs related to this initiative
eliminating approximately 270 associates. Of the $8,994 charge for the second quarter of 2009,
$4,631 related to the Mobile Industries segment, $1,848 related to the Process Industries segment,
$781 related to the Aerospace and Defense segment, $1,074 related to the Steel segment and $660
related to Corporate. Of the $11,301 charge for the first six months of 2009, $5,103 related to
the Mobile Industries segment, $2,028 related to the Process Industries segment, $790 related to
the Aerospace and Defense segment, $1,520 related to the Steel segment and $1,860 related to
Corporate.
Manufacturing Workforce Reductions
During the second quarter and first six months of 2009, the Company recorded $11,785 and $19,156,
respectively, in severance and related benefit costs, including a curtailment of pension benefits
of $1,611 for the first six months of 2009, to eliminate
approximately 1,900 associates to properly
align its business as a result of the current downturn in the economy and expected market demand.
Of the $11,785 charge, $7,663 related to the Mobile Industries segment, $1,771 related to the
Process Industries segment, $667 related to the Aerospace and Defense segment and $1,684 related to
the Steel segment. Of the $19,156 charge, $14,228 related to the Mobile Industries segment, $2,532
related to the Process Industries segment, $712 related to the Aerospace and Defense segment and
$1,684 related to the Steel segment.
Bearings and Power Transmission Reorganization
In August 2007, the Company announced the realignment of its management structure. During the
first quarter of 2008, the Company began to operate under two major business groups: the Steel
Group and the Bearings and Power Transmission Group. The Bearings and Power Transmission Group
includes three reportable segments: Mobile Industries, Process Industries and Aerospace and
Defense. The Company realized pretax savings of approximately $18,000 in 2008 as a result of these
changes. During the second quarter and first six months of 2008, the Company recorded $1,030 and
$2,122, respectively, of severance and related benefit costs related to this initiative.
Torrington Campus
On July 20, 2009, the Company sold the remaining portion of its Torrington, Connecticut office
complex. In anticipation of the loss that the Company expected to record upon completion of the
sale of the office complex, the Company recorded an impairment of $6,376 during the second quarter
of 2009. The Company had previously classified $4,392 of the assets as assets held for sale.
Mobile Industries
In March 2007, the Company announced the planned closure of its manufacturing facility in Sao
Paulo, Brazil. The closure of this manufacturing facility was subsequently delayed to serve higher
customer demand. However, with the current downturn in the economy, the Company believes it will
close this facility before the end of 2010. This closure is targeted to deliver annual pretax
savings of approximately $5,000, with expected pretax costs of approximately $25,000 to $30,000,
which includes restructuring costs and rationalization costs recorded in cost of products sold and
selling, administrative and general expenses. Due to the delay in the closure of this
manufacturing facility, the Company expects to realize the $5,000 of annual pretax savings before
the end of 2010, once this facility closes. Mobile Industries has incurred cumulative pretax costs
of approximately $19,957 as of June 30, 2009 related to this closure. During the second quarter
and first six months of 2009, the Company recorded $641 and $1,197, respectively, of severance and
related benefit costs and exit costs of $769 associated with the planned closure of the Companys
Sao Paulo, Brazil manufacturing facility. During the first six months of 2008, the Company
recorded $1,001 of severance and related benefit costs associated with this facility.
In addition to the above charges, the Company recorded impairment charges of $637 during the second
quarter of 2009 related to an impairment of fixed assets at its facility in Canada as a result of
the carrying value of these assets exceeding expected future cash flows. The Company also recorded
impairment charges of $897 during the first quarter of 2009 related to an impairment of fixed
assets at two of its facilities in France as a result of the carrying value of these assets
exceeding expected future cash flows. During the first quarter of 2008, the Company recorded an
impairment charge of $309 related to an impairment of fixed assets at its facility in Spain as a
result of the carrying value of these assets exceeding expected future cash flows due to the
then-anticipated sale of this facility.
15
Note 12 Impairment and Restructuring Charges (continued)
Process Industries
In May 2004, the Company announced plans to rationalize its three bearing plants in Canton, Ohio
within the Process Industries segment. This rationalization initiative is expected to deliver
annual pretax savings of approximately $20,000 through streamlining operations and workforce
reductions, with pretax costs of approximately $100,000 to $110,000 (including pretax cash costs of
approximately $45,000 to $50,000), by the end of 2009.
The Company recorded impairment charges of $24,694 and exit costs of $734 during the second quarter
of 2009 related to Process Industries rationalization plans. During the first six months of 2009,
the Company recorded impairment charges of $27,720 and exit costs of $1,297. During the second
quarter and first six months of 2008, the Company recorded exit costs of $1,343 and $1,431,
respectively, as a result of Process Industries rationalization plans. The significant impairment
charge recorded during the second quarter of 2009 is a result of the rapid deterioration of the
market sectors served by one of the rationalized plants, resulting in the carrying value of the
fixed assets for this plant exceeding its estimated future cash flows. The Company now expects to
close this facility by the end of 2009. The Process Industries segment has incurred cumulative
pretax costs of approximately $67,771 (including approximately
$25,300 of pretax cash costs) as of June
30, 2009 for these rationalization plans including rationalization costs recorded in cost of
products sold and selling, administrative and general expenses. As of June 30, 2009, the Process
Industries segment has realized approximately $15,000 in annual pretax savings.
Steel
In April 2007, the Company completed the closure of its seamless steel tube manufacturing facility
located in Desford, England. The Company recorded $325 of exit costs during the first six months
of 2008 related to this action.
The following is a rollforward of the consolidated restructuring accrual for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
18,946 |
|
|
$ |
24,455 |
|
Expense |
|
|
32,418 |
|
|
|
12,597 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(21,173 |
) |
|
|
(18,106 |
) |
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
30,191 |
|
|
$ |
18,946 |
|
|
The restructuring accrual at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 is included in Accounts payable
and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The restructuring accrual at June 30,
2009 excludes costs related to the curtailment of pension benefit plans of $1,611. The accrual at
June 30, 2009 includes $22,949 of severance and related benefits, with the remainder of the balance
primarily representing environmental exit costs. The majority of the $22,949 accrual relating to
severance and related benefits is expected to be paid by the end of 2009, with the remainder paid
before the end of 2010 once the closure of the manufacturing facility in Sao Paulo, Brazil is
completed.
16
Note 13 Retirement and Postretirement Benefit Plans
The following table sets forth the net periodic benefit cost for the Companys retirement and
postretirement benefit plans. The amounts for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 are
based on actuarial calculations prepared during 2008. Consistent with prior years, these
calculations will be updated later in the year. These updated calculations may result in different
net periodic benefit cost for 2009. The net periodic benefit cost recorded for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 is the Companys best estimate of each periods proportionate share of
the amounts to be recorded for the year ended December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
Postretirement |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
10,726 |
|
|
$ |
8,265 |
|
|
$ |
524 |
|
|
$ |
409 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
39,265 |
|
|
|
39,522 |
|
|
|
8,843 |
|
|
|
9,630 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(48,917 |
) |
|
|
(50,689 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
2,874 |
|
|
|
3,165 |
|
|
|
(578 |
) |
|
|
(619 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
8,377 |
|
|
|
7,317 |
|
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
Curtailment gain |
|
|
(239 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Amortization of transition asset |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
12,065 |
|
|
$ |
7,556 |
|
|
$ |
9,401 |
|
|
$ |
10,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
Postretirement |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
19,502 |
|
|
$ |
18,453 |
|
|
$ |
1,313 |
|
|
$ |
1,562 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
79,167 |
|
|
|
81,345 |
|
|
|
19,442 |
|
|
|
20,717 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(96,245 |
) |
|
|
(101,234 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
5,735 |
|
|
|
6,300 |
|
|
|
(1,122 |
) |
|
|
(1,089 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
17,820 |
|
|
|
14,552 |
|
|
|
1,868 |
|
|
|
3,383 |
|
Curtailment loss |
|
|
1,611 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Amortization of transition asset |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
27,549 |
|
|
$ |
19,367 |
|
|
$ |
21,501 |
|
|
$ |
24,573 |
|
|
Note 14 Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
$ |
(23,040 |
) |
|
$ |
44,584 |
|
|
$ |
(20,192 |
) |
|
$ |
95,824 |
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
26.5% |
|
|
|
33.1% |
|
|
|
22.7% |
|
|
|
35.3% |
|
|
The Companys provision for income taxes in interim periods is computed in accordance with FIN
18, Accounting for Income Taxes in Interim Periods an interpretation of APB Opinion No. 28 by
applying the appropriate annual effective tax rates to income or loss before income taxes for the
period. In addition, non-recurring or discrete items, including interest on prior year tax
liabilities, are recorded during the period in which they occur.
The effective tax rates on the pretax losses for the second quarter and first six months of 2009
were lower than the U.S. federal statutory tax rate primarily due to losses at certain foreign
subsidiaries where no tax benefit could be recorded and an unfavorable discrete tax adjustment
related to the reversal of a benefit claimed on a prior year income tax return. These decreases
were partially offset by the earnings in certain foreign jurisdictions where the effective tax rate
is less than 35% and the net effect of other U.S. tax items.
For the full year of 2009, the Company expects its effective tax rate to be in the range of 25% to
30%.
17
Note 15 Fair Value
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date
(exit price). SFAS No. 157 classifies the inputs used to measure fair value into the following
hierarchy:
|
Level 1 |
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
|
Level 2 |
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or
liabilities, or unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities
in markets that are not active, or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable
for the asset or liability. |
|
Level 3 |
|
Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. |
The following table presents the fair value hierarchy for those assets and liabilities measured at
fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
9,981 |
|
|
$ |
9,981 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Foreign currency hedges |
|
|
3,024 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,024 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
1,769 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,769 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
14,774 |
|
|
$ |
9,981 |
|
|
$ |
4,793 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency hedges |
|
$ |
5,569 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
5,569 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
$ |
5,569 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
5,569 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
The Company uses publicly available foreign currency forward and spot rates to measure the fair
value of its foreign currency forward contracts. The Companys interest rate swaps are remeasured
each period using observable market interest rates.
The Company does not believe it has significant concentrations of risk associated with the
counterparts to its financial instruments.
The following table presents the fair value hierarchy for those assets measured at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gains |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
(Losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets held for sale |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(4,392 |
) |
Long-lived assets held and used |
|
|
2,468 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,468 |
|
|
|
(31,238 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
2,468 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
2,468 |
|
|
$ |
(35,630 |
) |
|
|
|
|
In the first six months of 2009, in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, assets held for sale of $4,392 and assets
held and used of $33,705 were written down to their fair value of
$2,468 and impairment charges of
$35,630 were included in earnings. Assets held for sale of $4,392 and assets held and used of
$1,984, associated with the Companys former Torrington campus office complex, were written down to
zero and an impairment charge was recognized for the full amount. The Company recognized an
impairment charge during the second quarter in anticipation of recognizing a loss on the sale of
these assets sold on July 20, 2009.
18
Note 15 Fair Value (continued)
Assets held and used associated with the rationalization of the Process Industries three Canton,
Ohio bearing manufacturing facilities, with a carrying value of $29,815, were written down to their
fair value of $2,095, resulting in an impairment charge of $27,720, which was included in earnings
for the first six months of 2009. In addition to the Torrington campus office complex and the
rationalization of Process Industries facilities, a portion of assets held and used that were part
of a larger group of assets and had a total carrying value of $1,906 were found to be impaired
during the first six months of 2009, resulting in an impairment charge of $1,534. A portion of
these assets, with a carrying value of $128, were scrapped and written down to zero, while the
remaining assets of $1,778 were written down to their fair value of $373.
With the exception of the assets held and used associated with the Torrington campus office
complex, the estimated fair value was based on what the Company would receive for used machinery
and equipment, if sold. Of the total impairment charge of $35,630 recognized in earnings during
the first six months of 2009, $3,923 was recognized in the first quarter of 2009 and $31,707 was
recognized in the second quarter of 2009.
Note 16 Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations. The primary
risks managed by using derivative instruments are commodity price risk, foreign currency exchange
rate risk, and interest rate risk. Forward contracts
on various commodities are entered into to manage the price risk associated with forecasted
purchases of natural gas used in the Companys manufacturing process. Forward contracts on various
foreign currencies are entered into to manage the foreign currency exchange rate risk on forecasted
revenue denominated in foreign currencies. Other forward exchange contracts on various foreign
currencies are entered into to manage the foreign currency exchange rate risk associated with
certain of the Companys commitments denominated in foreign currencies. Interest rate swaps are
entered into to manage interest rate risk associated with the Companys fixed and floating-rate
borrowings.
In accordance with SFAS No. 133, the Company designates certain foreign currency forward contracts
as cash flow hedges of forecasted revenues, and certain interest rate hedges as fair value hedges
of fixed-rate borrowings. The majority of the Companys natural gas forward contracts are not
subject to any hedge designation as they are considered within the normal purchases exemption.
The Company does not purchase or hold any derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had $244,209 of outstanding foreign currency forward contracts at
notional value. The total notional value of foreign currency hedges as of December 31, 2008 was
$239,415.
Cash Flow Hedging Strategy
For certain derivative instruments that are designated as and qualify as cash flow hedges (i.e.,
hedging the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows that is attributable to a
particular risk), the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is
reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same
line item associated with the forecasted transaction and in the same period or periods during which
the hedged transaction affects earnings. The remaining gain or loss on the derivative instrument in
excess of the cumulative change in the present value of future cash flows of the hedged item, if
any (i.e., the ineffective portion), or hedge components excluded from the assessment of
effectiveness, are recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income during the current period.
To protect against a reduction in the value of forecasted foreign currency cash flows resulting
from export sales over the next year, the Company has instituted a foreign currency cash flow
hedging program. The Company hedges portions of its forecasted intra-group revenue or expense
denominated in foreign currencies with forward contracts. When the dollar strengthens significantly
against the foreign currencies, the decline in the present value of future foreign currency revenue
is offset by gains in the fair value of the forward contracts designated as hedges. Conversely,
when the dollar weakens, the increase in the present value of future foreign currency cash flows is
offset by losses in the fair value of the forward contracts.
Fair Value Hedging Strategy
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges (i.e., hedging the
exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset or a liability or an identified portion thereof
that is attributable to a particular risk), the gain or loss on the derivative instrument, as well
as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk, are recognized
in the same line item associated with the hedged item (i.e., in interest expense when the hedged
item is fixed-rate debt).
19
Note 16
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (continued)
The following table presents the fair value and location of all assets and liabilities
associated with the Companys hedging instruments within the unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
at |
|
|
|
Location |
|
at 6/30/09 |
|
|
at 12/31/08 |
|
|
at 6/30/09 |
|
|
12/31/08 |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
instruments under SFAS No. 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
$ |
1,112 |
|
|
$ |
4,398 |
|
|
$ |
4,827 |
|
|
$ |
7,635 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
1,769 |
|
|
|
2,357 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Natural gas forward contracts |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,559 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under SFAS No. 133 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,881 |
|
|
$ |
8,314 |
|
|
$ |
4,827 |
|
|
$ |
7,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments under SFAS No. 133 (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Other non-current assets / liabilities |
|
$ |
1,912 |
|
|
$ |
1,786 |
|
|
$ |
742 |
|
|
$ |
3,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
4,793 |
|
|
$ |
10,100 |
|
|
$ |
5,569 |
|
|
$ |
10,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
See Footnote 15 Fair Value for additional information on the Companys purpose for entering
into derivatives not designated as hedging instruments and its overall risk management strategies. |
The following tables present the impact of derivative instruments and their location within the
unaudited Consolidated Statement of Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain or (loss) |
|
|
Amount of gain or (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
recognized in income on |
|
|
recognized in income on |
|
|
|
|
|
derivative |
|
|
derivative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives in SFAS No. 133 |
|
Location of gain or (loss) |
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
fair value hedging |
|
recognized in income on |
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
relationships |
|
derivative |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
$ |
(1,339 |
) |
|
$ |
(589 |
) |
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas forward contracts |
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
(233 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,559 |
) |
|
|
(448 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
(116 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,339 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,148 |
) |
|
$ |
(419 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain or (loss) |
|
|
Amount of gain or (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
recognized in income on |
|
|
recognized in income on |
|
|
|
|
|
derivative |
|
|
derivative |
|
Hedged items in SFAS No. |
|
Location of gain or (loss) |
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
133 fair value hedge |
|
recognized in income on |
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
relationships |
|
derivative |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-rate debt |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(117 |
) |
|
$ |
1,339 |
|
|
$ |
589 |
|
|
$ |
(29 |
) |
Inventory |
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
|
$ |
1,339 |
|
|
$ |
1,774 |
|
|
$ |
(29 |
) |
|
20
Note 16
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain or |
|
|
Amount of gain or (loss) |
|
|
(loss) reclassified from |
|
|
recognized in OCI on |
|
|
AOCI into income |
|
|
derivative |
|
|
(effective portion) |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
Derivatives in SFAS No. 133 cash flow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hedging relationships |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
(113 |
) |
|
$ |
(701 |
) |
|
$ |
(845 |
) |
|
$ |
(121 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
(113 |
) |
|
$ |
(701 |
) |
|
$ |
(845 |
) |
|
$ |
(121 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain or (loss) |
|
|
Amount of gain or |
|
|
reclassified from AOCI |
|
|
(loss) recognized in |
|
|
into income (effective |
|
|
OCI on derivative |
|
|
portion) |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
Derivatives in SFAS No. 133 cash flow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hedging relationships |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
(412 |
) |
|
$ |
(148 |
) |
|
$ |
(39 |
) |
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(412 |
) |
|
$ |
(148 |
) |
|
$ |
(39 |
) |
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain or (loss) |
|
|
Amount of gain or |
|
|
|
|
recognized in income on |
|
|
(loss) recognized in |
|
|
|
|
derivative |
|
|
income on derivative |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
Derivatives not designated as |
|
Location of gain or (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hedging instruments under SFAS |
|
recognized in income on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. 133 |
|
derivative |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
$ |
(269 |
) |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
1,174 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
2,568 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
1,296 |
|
|
$ |
(335 |
) |
|
$ |
2,602 |
|
|
$ |
290 |
|
|
21
Note 17 Prior Period Adjustments
During the first quarter of 2009, the Company recorded two adjustments related to its 2008
Consolidated Financial Statements. In the first quarter of 2009, Net income (loss) attributable to
noncontrolling interest increased by $6,100 (after-tax) due to a correction of an error related to
the $48,765 goodwill impairment loss the Company recorded in the fourth quarter of 2008 for the
Mobile Industries segment. In recording the goodwill impairment loss in the fourth quarter of
2008, the Company did not fully recognize that a portion of the goodwill impairment loss related to
two separate subsidiaries in which the Company holds less than 100% ownership.
In addition, Income (loss) before income taxes decreased by $3,400 ($2,044 after-tax) due to a
correction of an error related to $3,400 of in-process research and development costs that were
recorded in Other current assets with the anticipation of being paid for by a third-party.
However, the Company subsequently realized that the balance could not be substantiated through a
contract with a third-party.
As a result of these errors, the Companys 2008 results were understated by $4,056, and the
Companys first quarter 2009 results were overstated by the same amount. Management of the Company
concluded the effect of the first quarter adjustments was immaterial to the Companys 2008 and
first quarter 2009 financial statements, as well as the projected full-year 2009 financial
statements.
Note 18 Subsequent Events
On July 29, 2009, the Company announced it has signed an agreement to sell the assets of its Needle
Roller Bearings (NRB) operations to JTEKT Corporation. Upon closing of the transaction, which is
expected to occur by the end of 2009 subject to customary regulatory
approvals and the satisfaction or waiver of other closing conditions, the Company would receive approximately $330,000 in cash
proceeds for these operations (including certain receivables to be
retained by the Company), subject to working capital adjustments. The NRB operations
primarily serve the automotive original-equipment market sectors and manufacture highly engineered
needle roller bearings, including an extensive range of radial and thrust needle roller bearings,
as well as bearing assemblies and loose needles, for automotive and industrial applications. The
NRB operations have facilities in Cairo, Dahlonega and Sylvania, Georgia; Greenville and Walhalla,
South Carolina; Bedford, Canada; Brno and Olomouc, Czech Republic; Maromme, Moult and Vierzon,
France; Kuensebeck, Germany; Bilbao, Spain; and the LiYuan District, China. The NRB operations
employ approximately 3,400 associates and had 2008 sales of approximately $620,000. The NRB
operations are included in the Companys Mobile Industries, Process Industries and Aerospace and
Defense reportable segments. The results of operations are expected to be classified as
Discontinued Operations during the third quarter of 2009. The Company expects to incur a loss on
sale of approximately $20,000 to $60,000 upon completion of the transaction. As such, the Company
expects to recognize an impairment loss in this range during the third quarter of 2009 as the
assets are classified as assets held for sale on the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet.
22
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
Introduction
The Timken Company is a leading global manufacturer of highly engineered anti-friction bearings and
assemblies, high-quality alloy steels and aerospace power transmission systems, as well as a
provider of related products and services. The Company operates under two business groups: the
Steel Group and the Bearings and Power Transmission Group. The Bearings and Power Transmission
Group is composed of three operating segments: (1) Mobile Industries, (2) Process Industries and
(3) Aerospace and Defense. These three operating segments and the Steel Group comprise the
Companys four reportable segments.
The Mobile Industries segment provides bearings, power transmission components and related products
and services. Customers of the Mobile Industries segment include original equipment manufacturers
and suppliers for passenger cars, light trucks, medium and heavy-duty trucks, rail cars,
locomotives and agricultural, construction and mining equipment. Customers also include
aftermarket distributors of automotive products. The Companys strategy for the Mobile Industries
segment is to improve financial performance by allocating assets to serve the most attractive
market sectors and restructuring or exiting those businesses where adequate returns cannot be
achieved over the long-term.
The Process Industries segment provides bearings, power transmission components and related
products and services. Customers of the Process Industries segment include original equipment
manufacturers of power transmission, energy and heavy industries machinery and equipment, including
rolling mills, cement and aggregate processing equipment, paper mills, sawmills, printing presses,
cranes, hoists, drawbridges, wind energy turbines, gear drives, drilling equipment, coal conveyors
and crushers and food processing equipment. Customers also include aftermarket distributors of
products other than those for steel and automotive applications. The Companys strategy for the
Process Industries segment is to pursue growth in selected industrial market sectors and in the
aftermarket and to achieve a leadership position in Asia. In December 2007, the Company announced
the establishment of a joint venture, Timken XEMC (Hunan) Bearings Co., Ltd., in China, to
manufacture ultra-large-bore bearings for the growing Chinese wind energy market. In October 2008,
the joint venture broke ground on a new wind energy plant to be built in China. Bearings produced
at this facility are expected to be available in 2010. In April 2008, the Process Industries
segment began shipping product from its new industrial bearing plant in Chennai, India. In October
2008, the Company announced that it would expand production at its Tyger River facility in Union,
South Carolina to make ultra-large-bore bearings to serve wind-turbine manufacturers in North
America.
The Aerospace and Defense segment manufactures bearings, helicopter transmission systems, rotor
head assemblies, turbine engine components, gears and other precision flight-critical components
for commercial and military aviation applications. The Aerospace and Defense segment also provides
aftermarket services, including repair and overhaul of engines, transmissions and fuel controls, as
well as aerospace bearing repair and component reconditioning. In addition, the Aerospace and
Defense segment manufactures bearings for original equipment manufacturers of health and
positioning control equipment. The Companys strategy for the Aerospace and Defense segment is to:
(1) grow by adding power transmission parts, assemblies and services, utilizing a platform
approach; (2) develop new aftermarket channels; and (3) add core bearing capacity through
manufacturing initiatives in North America and China. In April 2008, the Company opened a new
aerospace precision products manufacturing facility in China. In November 2008, the Company
completed the acquisition of the assets of EXTEX Ltd. (EXTEX), located in Gilbert, Arizona. EXTEX
is a leading designer and marketer of high-quality replacement engine parts for the aerospace
aftermarket.
The Steel segment manufactures more than 450 grades of carbon and alloy steel, which are produced
in both solid and tubular sections with a variety of lengths and finishes. The Steel segment also
manufactures custom-made steel products for both industrial and automotive applications. The
Companys strategy for the Steel segment is to focus on opportunities where the Company can offer
differentiated capabilities while driving profitable growth. In November 2008, the Company opened
a new small-bar steel rolling mill to expand its portfolio of differentiated steel products. The
new mill enables the Company to competitively produce steel bars down to 1-inch diameter for use in
power transmission and friction management applications for a variety of customers, including
foreign automakers. In February 2008, the Company completed the acquisition of the assets of
Boring Specialties, Inc. (BSI), a provider of a wide range of precision deep-hole oil and gas
drilling and extraction products and services.
In addition to specific segment initiatives, the Company has been making strategic investments in
business processes and systems. Project O.N.E. is a multi-year program, which began in 2005,
designed to improve the Companys business processes and systems. The Company expects to invest
approximately $210 million to $220 million, which includes internal and external costs, to
implement Project O.N.E. As of June 30, 2009, the Company has incurred costs of approximately
$205.8 million, of which approximately $118.1 million have been capitalized to the Consolidated
Balance Sheet. During 2008 and 2007, the Company completed the installation of Project O.N.E. for
the majority of the Companys domestic operations and a major portion of its European operations.
On April 1, 2009, the Company completed the next installation of Project O.N.E. for the majority of
the Companys remaining European operations, as well as certain other facilities in North America
and India. With the completion of the April 2009 installation of Project O.N.E., approximately 80%
of the Bearings and Power Transmission Groups global sales flow through the new system.
23
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Financial Overview
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overview: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2Q 2009 |
|
|
2Q 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except earnings per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
828.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,535.5 |
|
|
$ |
(706.6 |
) |
|
|
(46.0 |
)% |
Net (loss) income attributable to The Timken Company |
|
|
(64.5 |
) |
|
|
88.9 |
|
|
|
(153.4 |
) |
|
|
(172.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share |
|
$ |
(0.67 |
) |
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
$ |
(1.59 |
) |
|
|
(172.8 |
)% |
Average number of shares diluted |
|
|
96,147,809 |
|
|
|
96,169,184 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(0.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
|
YTD 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except earnings per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,789.3 |
|
|
$ |
2,970.2 |
|
|
$ |
(1,180.9 |
) |
|
|
(39.8 |
)% |
Net (loss) income attributable to The Timken Company |
|
|
(63.6 |
) |
|
|
173.4 |
|
|
|
(237.0 |
) |
|
|
(136.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share |
|
$ |
(0.66 |
) |
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
|
$ |
(2.46 |
) |
|
|
(136.7 |
)% |
Average number of shares diluted |
|
|
96,082,491 |
|
|
|
95,919,563 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
Net sales for the second quarter of 2009 were approximately $0.83 billion, compared to $1.54
billion in the second quarter of 2008, a decrease of 46.0%. Net sales for the first six months of
2009 were approximately $1.79 billion, compared to $2.97 billion in the first six months of 2008, a
decrease of 39.8%. Sales were lower across all business segments except for the Aerospace and
Defense segment. The decrease in sales was primarily driven by lower volume and lower steel
surcharges, partially offset by the impact of favorable pricing. For the second quarter of 2009,
losses were $0.67 per share, compared to earnings of $0.92 per diluted share for the second quarter
of 2008. For the first six months of 2009, losses were $0.66 per share, compared to earnings of
$1.80 per diluted share for the first six months of 2008.
The Companys second quarter and first six months results reflect the deterioration of most market sectors as a result of the current global economic downturn. The impact of lower volume and higher
restructuring charges, as a result of actions taken to align the Companys businesses with current
demand, was partially offset by lower raw material costs and lower selling and administrative
costs. Additionally, the Companys results for the first six months of 2008 reflected a pretax
gain of $20.2 million on the sale of the Companys former seamless steel tube manufacturing
facility located in Desford, England.
Subsequent to the end of the second quarter of 2009, on July 29, 2009, the Company announced it has signed an agreement
to sell the assets of its Needle Roller Bearings (NRB) operations to JTEKT Corporation. Upon closing of the transaction,
which is expected to occur by the end of 2009 subject to customary regulatory approvals and the satisfaction or waiver of
other closing conditions, the Company would receive approximately $330 million in cash proceeds for these operations
(including certain receivables to be retained by the Company), subject to working capital adjustments. The NRB operations
primarily serve the automotive original-equipment market sectors and manufacture highly engineered needle roller bearings,
including an extensive range of radial and thrust needle roller bearings, as well as bearing assemblies and loose needles,
for automotive and industrial applications. The NRB operations have facilities in the United States, Canada, Europe and
China. The NRB operations had 2008 sales of approximately $620 million and are included in the Companys Mobile Industries,
Process Industries and Aerospace and Defense reportable segments. The results of operations are expected to be classified
as Discontinued Operations during the third quarter of 2009. The Company expects to incur a loss on sale of approximately
$20 million to $60 million upon completion of the transaction, resulting in an impairment loss in this range during the
third quarter of 2009 as the assets are classified as assets held for sale.
Outlook
The Companys outlook for 2009 reflects a deteriorating global economic climate that is expected to
last through the remainder of the year, impacting most of the Companys market sectors. Lower
sales, compared to 2008, are expected in all business segments except for the Aerospace and Defense
segment. A significant portion of the decrease in the Steel segment sales is expected to be due to
significantly lower surcharges to recover raw material costs, which were at historically high
levels during the middle of 2008, but declined dramatically towards the end of 2008. The Companys
results will continue to reflect lower margins as a result of the lower volume and surcharges,
partially offset by improved pricing, lower raw material costs and lower selling, administrative
and general expenses. The Company expects to continue to take actions to properly align its
business with current market demand. In the first half of 2009, the Company announced that it
planned to eliminate approximately 400 sales and administrative salaried positions and implement
other cost savings initiatives that are targeted to save approximately $80 million in annual
selling and administrative expenses.
The
Company expects to generate cash from operations for the full year of 2009 as a result of working
capital reductions and lower income taxes. In addition, the Company expects to decrease capital
expenditures by approximately 50% in 2009, compared to 2008.
24
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
The Statement of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales by Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2Q 2009 |
|
|
2Q 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
(Dollars in millions, and exclude intersegment sales) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Industries |
|
$ |
365.7 |
|
|
$ |
628.2 |
|
|
$ |
(262.5 |
) |
|
|
(41.8 |
)% |
Process Industries |
|
|
221.0 |
|
|
|
327.5 |
|
|
|
(106.5 |
) |
|
|
(32.5 |
)% |
Aerospace and Defense |
|
|
113.2 |
|
|
|
105.7 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
% |
Steel |
|
|
129.0 |
|
|
|
474.1 |
|
|
|
(345.1 |
) |
|
|
(72.8 |
)% |
|
Total Company |
|
$ |
828.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,535.5 |
|
|
$ |
(706.6 |
) |
|
|
(46.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
|
YTD 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
(Dollars in millions, and exclude intersegment sales) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Industries |
|
$ |
738.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,263.5 |
|
|
$ |
(524.9 |
) |
|
|
(41.5 |
)% |
Process Industries |
|
|
463.3 |
|
|
|
639.7 |
|
|
|
(176.4 |
) |
|
|
(27.6 |
)% |
Aerospace and Defense |
|
|
225.8 |
|
|
|
207.8 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
% |
Steel |
|
|
361.6 |
|
|
|
859.2 |
|
|
|
(497.6 |
) |
|
|
(57.9 |
)% |
|
Total Company |
|
$ |
1,789.3 |
|
|
$ |
2,970.2 |
|
|
$ |
(1,180.9 |
) |
|
|
(39.8 |
)% |
|
Net sales for the second quarter of 2009 decreased $706.6 million, or 46.0%, compared to the second
quarter of 2008, primarily due to lower volume of approximately $560 million across most business
segments, except for the Aerospace and Defense segment, lower steel surcharges of approximately
$175 million and the effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes of approximately $60 million,
partially offset by improved pricing and favorable sales mix of approximately $70 million.
Net sales for the first six months of 2009 decreased $1.18 billion, or 39.8%, compared to the first
six months of 2008, primarily due to lower volume of approximately $960 million across most
business segments, except for the Aerospace and Defense segment, lower steel surcharges of
approximately $255 million and the effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes of
approximately $135 million, partially offset by improved pricing and favorable sales mix of
approximately $150 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2Q 2009 |
|
|
2Q 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
118.8 |
|
|
$ |
343.7 |
|
|
$ |
(224.9 |
) |
|
|
(65.4)% |
|
Gross profit % to net sales |
|
|
14.3% |
|
|
|
22.4% |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
(810) |
bps |
Rationalization expenses included in cost of products sold |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
|
55.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
|
YTD 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
271.0 |
|
|
$ |
655.3 |
|
|
$ |
(384.3 |
) |
|
|
(58.6)% |
|
Gross profit % to net sales |
|
|
15.1% |
|
|
|
22.1% |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
(700) |
bps |
Rationalization expenses included in cost of products sold |
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
|
18.2% |
|
|
|
Gross profit margin decreased in the second quarter of 2009, compared to the second quarter of
2008, due to the impact of lower sales volume across most market sectors of approximately $215
million, lower steel surcharges of $175 million and higher manufacturing costs of approximately
$120 million, partially offset by lower raw material costs of approximately $150 million, improved
pricing and sales mix of approximately $70 million and lower logistics costs of approximately $30
million. The higher manufacturing costs were primarily driven by the Mobile Industries and Steel
segments as a result of the underutilization of plant capacity. The lower raw material costs are
primarily due to lower scrap steel costs as scrap steel and other raw material costs have fallen in
2009 from historically high levels in 2008.
Gross profit margin decreased in the first six months of 2009, compared to the first six months
of 2008, due to the impact of lower sales volume across most market sectors of approximately $330
million, lower steel surcharges of $255 million and higher manufacturing costs of approximately
$220 million, partially offset by lower raw material costs of
approximately $200 million, improved
pricing and sales mix of approximately $140 million and lower logistics costs of approximately $55
million.
25
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
In the second quarter and the first six months of 2009, rationalization expenses included in cost
of products sold primarily related to the continued rationalization of Process Industries Canton,
Ohio bearing manufacturing facilities. In the second quarter and first six months of 2008,
rationalization expenses included in cost of products sold primarily related to certain Mobile
Industries segment domestic manufacturing facilities, the closure of the Companys seamless steel
tube
manufacturing operations located in Desford, England and the continued rationalization of Process
Industries Canton, Ohio bearing manufacturing facilities. Rationalization expenses in the
respective periods of 2009 and 2008 primarily consisted of accelerated depreciation and relocation
of equipment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Administrative and General Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2Q 2009 |
|
|
2Q 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, administrative and general expenses |
|
$ |
142.3 |
|
|
$ |
196.6 |
|
|
$ |
(54.3 |
) |
|
|
(27.6)% |
|
Selling, administrative and general expenses % to net sales |
|
|
17.2% |
|
|
|
12.8% |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
440 |
bps |
Rationalization expenses included in selling, administrative
and general expenses |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(23.1)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
|
YTD 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, administrative and general expenses |
|
$ |
281.3 |
|
|
$ |
374.5 |
|
|
$ |
(93.2 |
) |
|
|
(24.9)% |
|
Selling, administrative and general expenses % to net sales |
|
|
15.7% |
|
|
|
12.6% |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
310 |
bps |
Rationalization expenses included in selling, administrative
and general expenses |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(38.1)% |
|
|
|
The decrease in selling, administrative and general expenses in the second quarter of 2009,
compared to the second quarter of 2008, was primarily due to restructuring initiatives and lower
discretionary spending on items such as travel and professional fees of approximately $30 million
and lower performance-based compensation of approximately $20 million. The decrease in selling,
administrative and general expenses in the first six months of 2009, compared to the first six
months of 2008, was primarily due to restructuring initiatives and lower discretionary spending on
items such as travel and professional fees of approximately $50 million and lower performance-based
compensation of approximately $40 million.
In the second quarter and first six months of 2009, the rationalization expenses included in
selling, administrative and general expenses primarily related to exit costs for associates exiting
the Company. In the
second quarter and first six months of 2008, the rationalization expenses included in selling,
administrative and general expenses primarily related to the rationalization of the Process
Industries Canton, Ohio bearing facilities and costs associated with vacating the Torrington,
Connecticut office complex.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment and Restructuring Charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2Q 2009 |
|
|
2Q 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges |
|
$ |
31.7 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
31.7 |
|
Severance and related benefit costs |
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
Exit costs |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
54.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
53.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
|
YTD 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges |
|
$ |
35.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
35.2 |
|
Severance and related benefit costs |
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
29.4 |
|
Exit costs |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
69.7 |
|
|
$ |
4.7 |
|
|
$ |
65.0 |
|
|
The following discussion explains the major impairment and restructuring charges recorded for the
periods presented; however, it is not intended to reflect a comprehensive discussion of all amounts
in the tables above. See Note 12 Impairment and Restructuring for further details by segment.
26
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Selling and Administrative Cost Reductions
In March 2009, the Company announced the realignment of its organization to improve efficiency and
reduce costs as a result of the economic downturn. The Company had targeted pretax savings of
approximately $30 million to $40 million in annual selling and administrative costs. In April
2009, in light of the Companys revised forecast indicating significantly reduced sales and
earnings for the year, the Company expanded the target to approximately $80 million. The
implementation of these savings began in the first quarter of 2009 and is expected to be
substantially completed by the end
of the fourth quarter of 2009, with full-year savings expected to be achieved in 2010. As the
Company streamlines its operating structure, it expects to cut up to 400 sales and administrative
associate positions in 2009, incurring severance costs of approximately $15 million to $20 million.
During the second quarter and first six months of 2009, the Company recorded $9.0 million and
$11.3 million, respectively, of severance and related benefit costs related to this initiative to
eliminate approximately 270 associates. Of the $9.0 million charge for the second quarter of 2009,
$4.6 million related to the Mobile Industries segment, $1.8 million related to the Process
Industries segment, $0.8 million related to the Aerospace and Defense segment, $1.1 million related
to the Steel segment and $0.7 million related to Corporate. Of the $11.3 million charge for the
first six months of 2009, $5.1 million related to the Mobile Industries segment, $2.0 million
related to the Process Industries segment, $0.8 million related to the Aerospace and Defense
segment, $1.5 million related to the Steel segment and $1.9 million related to Corporate.
Manufacturing Workforce Reductions
During the second quarter and first six months of 2009, the Company recorded $11.8 million and
$19.2 million, respectively, in severance and related benefit costs, including a curtailment of
pension benefits of $1.6 million for the first six months of
2009, to eliminate approximately 1,900
associates to properly align its business as a result of the current downturn in the economy and
expected market demand. Of the $11.8 million charge, $7.6 million related to the Mobile Industries
segment, $1.8 million related to the Process Industries segment, $0.7 million related to the
Aerospace and Defense segment and $1.7 million related to the Steel segment. Of the $19.2 million
charge, $14.2 million related to the Mobile Industries segment, $2.6 million related to the Process
Industries segment, $0.7 million related to the Aerospace and Defense segment and $1.7 million
related to the Steel segment.
Bearings and Power Transmission Reorganization
In August 2007, the Company announced the realignment of its management structure. During the
first quarter of 2008, the Company began to operate under two major business groups: the Steel
Group and the Bearings and Power Transmission Group. The Bearings and Power Transmission Group
includes three reportable segments: Mobile Industries, Process Industries and Aerospace and
Defense. The Company realized pretax savings of approximately $18 million in 2008 as a result of
these changes. During the second quarter and first six months of 2008, the Company recorded $1.0
million and $2.1 million, respectively, of severance and related benefit costs related to this
initiative.
Torrington Campus
On July 20, 2009, the Company sold the remaining portion of its Torrington, Connecticut office
complex. In anticipation of the loss that the Company expected to record upon completion of the
sale of the office complex, the Company recorded an impairment of $6.4 million during the second
quarter of 2009. The Company had previously classified $4.4 million of the assets as assets held
for sale.
Mobile Industries
In March 2007, the Company announced the planned closure of its manufacturing facility in Sao
Paulo, Brazil. The closure of this manufacturing facility was subsequently delayed to serve higher
customer demand. However, with the current downturn in the economy, the Company believes it will
close this facility before the end of 2010. This closure is targeted to deliver annual pretax
savings of approximately $5 million, with expected pretax costs of approximately $25 million to $30
million, which includes restructuring costs and rationalization costs recorded in cost of products
sold and selling, administrative and general expenses. Due to the delay in the closure of this
manufacturing facility, the Company expects to realize the $5 million of annual pretax savings
before the end of 2010, once this facility closes. Mobile Industries has incurred cumulative
pretax costs of approximately $20.0 million as of June 30, 2009 related to this closure. During
the second quarter and first six months of 2009, the Company recorded $0.6 million and $1.2
million, respectively, of severance and related benefit costs and exit cost of $0.8 million
associated with the planned closure of the Companys Sao Paulo, Brazil manufacturing facility.
During the first six months of 2008, the Company recorded $1.0 million of severance and related
benefit costs associated with the planned closure of the Companys Sao Paulo, Brazil manufacturing
facility.
In addition to the above charges, the Company recorded impairment charges of $0.6 million during
the second quarter of 2009 related to an impairment of fixed assets at its facility in Canada as a
result of the carrying value of these assets exceeding expected future cash flows. The Company
also recorded impairment charges of $0.9 million during the first quarter of 2009 related to an
impairment of fixed assets at two of its facilities in France as a result of the carrying value of
these assets exceeding expected future cash flows. During the first quarter of 2008, the Company
recorded an impairment charge of $0.3 million related to an impairment of fixed assets at its
facility in Spain as a result of the carrying value of these assets exceeding expected future cash
flows due to the then-anticipated sale of this facility.
27
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Process Industries
In May 2004, the Company announced plans to rationalize its three bearing plants in Canton, Ohio
within the Process Industries segment. This rationalization initiative is expected to deliver
annual pretax savings of approximately $20 million through streamlining operations and workforce
reductions, with pretax costs of approximately $100 million to $110 million (including pretax cash
costs of approximately $45 million to $50 million), by the end of 2009.
The Company recorded impairment charges of $24.7 million and exit costs of $0.7 million during the
second quarter of 2009
related to Process Industries rationalization plans. During the first six months of 2009, the
Company recorded impairment charges of $27.7 million and exit costs of $1.3 million. During the
second quarter and first six months of 2008, the Company recorded exit costs of $1.3 million and
$1.4 million as a result of Process Industries rationalization plans. The significant impairment
charge recorded during the second quarter of 2009 is a result of the rapid deterioration of the
market sectors served by one of the rationalized plants resulting in the carrying value of the
fixed assets for this plant exceeding their future cash flows. The Company now expects to close
this facility by the end of 2009. The Process Industries segment has incurred cumulative pretax
costs of approximately $67.8 million (including approximately
$25.3 million of pretax cash costs) as of
June 30, 2009 for these rationalization plans, including rationalization costs recorded in cost of
products sold and selling, administrative and general expenses. As of June 30, 2009, the Process
Industries segment has realized approximately $15 million in annual pretax savings.
Steel
In April 2007, the Company completed the closure of its seamless steel tube manufacturing facility
located in Desford, England. The Company recorded $0.4 million of exit costs during the first six
months of 2008 related to this action.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rollforward of Restructuring Accruals: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
18.9 |
|
|
$ |
24.5 |
|
Expense |
|
|
32.4 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(21.1 |
) |
|
|
(18.2 |
) |
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
30.2 |
|
|
$ |
18.9 |
|
|
The restructuring accrual at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 is included in Accounts payable
and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The restructuring accrual at June 30,
2009 excludes costs related to the curtailment of pension benefit plans of $1.6 million. The
accrual at June 30, 2009 includes $22.9 million of severance and related benefits, with the
remainder of the balance primarily representing environmental exit costs. The majority of the
$22.9 million accrual relating to severance and related benefits is expected to be paid by the end
of 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense and Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2Q 2009 |
|
|
2Q 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
8.5 |
|
|
$ |
11.6 |
|
|
$ |
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(26.7 |
)% |
Interest income |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(66.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
|
YTD 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
17.0 |
|
|
$ |
22.6 |
|
|
$ |
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
(24.8 |
)% |
Interest income |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
$ |
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(69.0 |
)% |
|
Interest expense for the second quarter and first six months of 2009 decreased compared to the
second quarter and first six months of 2008, primarily due to lower average debt outstanding.
Interest income for the second quarter and first six months of 2009 decreased compared to the same
periods in the prior year primarily due to lower interest rates on invested cash balances.
28
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income and Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2Q 2009 |
|
|
2Q 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on divestitures of non-strategic assets |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
)% |
Gain (loss) on dissolution of subsidiaries |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
NM |
Other income (expense) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(44.4 |
)% |
|
Other (expense) income, net |
|
$ |
(0.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
|
YTD 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on divestitures of non-strategic assets |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
20.5 |
|
|
$ |
(19.2 |
) |
|
|
(93.7 |
)% |
Gain (loss) on dissolution of subsidiaries |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
NM |
Other income (expense) |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
186.0 |
% |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
|
$ |
14.8 |
|
|
$ |
(7.9 |
) |
|
|
(53.4 |
)% |
|
The gain on divestitures of non-strategic assets for the first six months of 2009 primarily related
to the sale of one of the buildings at the Companys former office complex located in Torrington,
Connecticut. The gain on divestitures of non-strategic assets for the first six months of 2008
primarily related to the sale of the Companys former seamless steel tube manufacturing facility
located in Desford, England. In February 2008, the Company completed the sale of this facility,
resulting in a pretax gain of approximately $20.4 million.
For the second quarter of 2009, other (expense) income, net primarily consisted of $1.4 million of
losses on the disposal of fixed assets. For the second quarter of 2008, other (expense) income,
net primarily consisted of $1.5 million of losses on the disposal of fixed assets and $1.4 million
of donations, partially offset by gains on equity investments of $1.5 million. For the first six
months of 2009, other income (expense), net primarily consisted of $6.9 million of foreign currency
exchange gains and $0.7 million of royalty income, partially offset by $2.7 million of losses on
the disposal of fixed assets and $1.3 million of losses from equity investments. For the first six
months of 2008, other (expense) income, net primarily consisted of $4.4 million of losses on the
disposal of fixed assets, $1.8 million of donations and $1.6 million of foreign currency exchange
losses, partially offset by gains on equity investments of $1.3 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2Q 2009 |
|
|
2Q 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
$ |
(23.0 |
) |
|
$ |
44.6 |
|
|
$ |
(67.6 |
) |
|
|
(151.6)% |
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
26.5 |
% |
|
|
33.1 |
% |
|
|
- |
|
|
(660) |
bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
|
YTD 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
$ |
(20.2 |
) |
|
$ |
95.8 |
|
|
$ |
(116.0 |
) |
|
|
(121.1)% |
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
22.7 |
% |
|
|
35.3 |
% |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1,260) |
bps |
|
|
The decrease in the effective tax rate in the second quarter and first six months of 2009, compared
to the same periods in 2008, was primarily due to increased losses at certain foreign subsidiaries
where no tax benefit could be recorded.
The effective tax rates on the pretax losses for the second quarter and first six months of 2009
were lower than the U.S. federal statutory tax rate primarily due to losses at certain foreign
subsidiaries where no tax benefit could be recorded and an unfavorable discrete tax adjustment
related to the reversal of a benefit claimed on a prior year income tax return. These decreases
were partially offset by the earnings in certain foreign jurisdictions where the effective tax rate
is less than 35% and the net effect of other U.S. tax items. For the full year of 2009, the
Company expects its effective tax rate to be in the range of 25% to 30%.
29
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest: |
|
|
|
2Q 2009 |
|
|
2Q 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(40.0)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
|
YTD 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
(5.3 |
) |
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
(7.2 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
On January 1, 2009, the Company implemented Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160
(SFAS No. 160), Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements. SFAS No. 160
establishes requirements for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the
Company (sometimes called minority interests) to be clearly identified, presented, and disclosed
in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but separate from the parents
equity. In addition, SFAS No. 160 requires that net income (loss) attributable to parties other
than the Company be separately reported on the Consolidated Statement of Income. In the second
quarter of 2009, the net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest decreased $0.4
million, compared to the second quarter of 2008, as a result of lower volume for subsidiaries in
which the Company holds less than 100% ownership. For the first six months of 2009, the net income
(loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest was a loss of $5.3 million, compared to income of
$1.9 million for the first six months of 2008. In the first quarter of 2009, net income (loss)
attributable to noncontrolling interest increased by $6.1 million due to a correction of an error
related to the $48.8 million goodwill impairment loss the Company recorded in the fourth quarter of
2008 for the Mobile Industries segment. In recording the goodwill impairment loss in the fourth
quarter of 2008, the Company did not fully recognize that a portion of the goodwill impairment loss
related to two separate subsidiaries in which the Company holds less than 100% ownership. As a
result, the Companys 2008 financial statements were understated by $6.1 million and the Companys
first quarter 2009 financial statements were overstated by $6.1 million. Management concluded the
effect of the first quarter adjustment was immaterial to the
Companys 2008 and first quarter 2009
financial statements, as well as the projected full-year 2009 financial statements.
Business Segments:
The primary measurement used by management to measure the financial performance of each segment is
adjusted EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes, excluding the effect of amounts related to
certain items that management considers not representative of ongoing operations such as impairment
and restructuring, manufacturing rationalization and integration charges, one-time gains or losses
on disposal of non-strategic assets, allocated receipts received or payments made under the U.S.
Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (CDSOA) and gains and losses on the dissolution of
subsidiaries). Refer to Note 11 Segment Information for the reconciliation of adjusted EBIT by
segment to consolidated income before income taxes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Industries Segment: |
|
|
|
2Q 2009 |
|
|
2Q 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
365.7 |
|
|
$ |
628.2 |
|
|
$ |
(262.5 |
) |
|
|
(41.8)% |
|
Adjusted EBIT (loss) |
|
$ |
(36.4 |
) |
|
$ |
14.0 |
|
|
$ |
(50.4 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Adjusted EBIT (loss) margin |
|
|
(10.0)% |
|
|
|
2.2% |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
(1,220) |
bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
|
YTD 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
738.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,263.5 |
|
|
$ |
(524.9 |
) |
|
|
(41.5)% |
|
Adjusted EBIT (loss) |
|
$ |
(61.3 |
) |
|
$ |
44.5 |
|
|
$ |
(105.8 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Adjusted EBIT (loss) margin |
|
|
(8.3)% |
|
|
|
3.5% |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
(1,180) |
bps |
|
|
The presentation below reconciles the changes in net sales of the Mobile Industries segment
operations reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP to net sales adjusted to remove the effects of
currency exchange rates. The effects of currency exchange rates are removed to allow investors and
the Company to meaningfully evaluate the percentage change in net sales on a comparable basis from
period to period. The year 2008 represents the base year for which the effects of currency are
measured; as such, currency is assumed to be zero for 2008.
30
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2Q 2009 |
|
|
2Q 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
365.7 |
|
|
$ |
628.2 |
|
|
$ |
(262.5 |
) |
|
|
(41.8)% |
|
Currency |
|
|
(36.8 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(36.8 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
Net sales, excluding the impact of currency |
|
$ |
402.5 |
|
|
$ |
628.2 |
|
|
$ |
(225.7 |
) |
|
|
(35.9)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
|
YTD 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
738.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,263.5 |
|
|
$ |
(524.9 |
) |
|
|
(41.5)% |
|
Currency |
|
|
(85.2 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(85.2 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
Net sales, excluding the impact of currency |
|
$ |
823.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,263.5 |
|
|
$ |
(439.7 |
) |
|
|
(34.8)% |
|
|
|
The Mobile Industries segments net sales, excluding the effects of currency-rate changes,
decreased 35.9% for the second quarter of 2009, compared to the second quarter of 2008, primarily
due to lower volume of approximately $245 million, partially offset by improved pricing and
favorable sales mix of approximately $25 million. The lower volume was seen across all market
sectors, led by a 41% decline in light vehicle demand, a 62% decline in heavy truck demand and a
50% decline in global off-highway demand. Adjusted EBIT was lower in the second quarter of 2009
compared to the second quarter of 2008, primarily due to the impact of underutilization of
manufacturing capacity of approximately $70 million and the impact of lower demand of $50 million,
partially offset by improved pricing and favorable sales mix of approximately $25 million, lower
selling, administrative and general expenses of $25 million and lower logistics costs of
approximately $15 million. The lower selling, administrative and general expenses reflect actions
taken by management to align business activities with market conditions.
The Mobile Industries segments net sales, excluding the effects of currency-rate changes,
decreased 34.8% for the first six months of 2009, compared to the first six months of 2008,
primarily due to lower volume of approximately $485 million, partially offset by improved pricing
and favorable sales mix of approximately $50 million. The lower volume was seen across all market
sectors, led by a 43% decline in light vehicle demand, a 61% decline in heavy truck demand and a
41% decline in off-highway demand. Adjusted EBIT was lower in the first six months of 2009
compared to the first six months of 2008, primarily due to the impact of underutilization of
manufacturing capacity of approximately $140 million and the impact of lower demand of $95 million,
partially offset by improved pricing and favorable sales mix of approximately $50 million, lower
selling, administrative and general expenses of $50 million and lower logistics costs of
approximately $30 million.
The Mobile Industries segments sales are expected to decrease approximately 30% to 35% in the
second half of 2009, compared to the second half of 2008, as demand is expected to be down across
all of the Mobile Industries market sectors. These decreases are expected to be partially offset
by improved pricing. The Company believes it will be able to continue to obtain year-over-year
price improvements based on recent experience. The Company expects to see improvements from its
automotive distribution channel during the latter part of 2009, compared to the first half of 2009.
In addition, adjusted EBIT for the Mobile Industries segment is expected to decrease during the
remaining six months of 2009, compared to the same period of the prior year, as lower demand is
partially offset by improved pricing and lower selling, administrative and general expenses. In
reaction to the current and anticipated lower demand, the Mobile Industries segment reduced total
employment levels by approximately 2,500 positions during the first half of 2009. The Company
expects to continue to take actions in the Mobile Industries segment to properly align its business
with market demand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Process Industries Segment: |
|
|
|
2Q 2009 |
|
|
2Q 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
221.7 |
|
|
$ |
328.4 |
|
|
$ |
(106.7 |
) |
|
|
(32.5)% |
|
Adjusted EBIT |
|
$ |
37.6 |
|
|
$ |
62.8 |
|
|
$ |
(25.2 |
) |
|
|
(40.1)% |
|
Adjusted EBIT margin |
|
|
17.0% |
|
|
|
19.1% |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
(210) |
bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
|
YTD 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
464.9 |
|
|
$ |
641.0 |
|
|
$ |
(176.1 |
) |
|
|
(27.5)% |
|
Adjusted EBIT |
|
$ |
84.6 |
|
|
$ |
121.8 |
|
|
$ |
(37.2 |
) |
|
|
(30.5)% |
|
Adjusted EBIT margin |
|
|
18.2% |
|
|
|
19.0% |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
(80) |
bps |
|
|
31
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
The presentation below reconciles the changes in net sales of the Process Industries segment
operations reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP to net sales adjusted to remove the effects of currency exchange rates.
The effects of currency exchange rates are removed to allow investors and the Company to
meaningfully evaluate the percentage change in net sales on a comparable basis from period to
period. The year 2008 represents the base year for which the effects of currency are measured; as
such, currency is assumed to be zero for 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2Q 2009 |
|
|
2Q 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
221.7 |
|
|
$ |
328.4 |
|
|
$ |
(106.7 |
) |
|
|
(32.5)% |
|
Currency |
|
|
(17.5 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(17.5 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
Net sales, excluding the impact of currency |
|
$ |
239.2 |
|
|
$ |
328.4 |
|
|
$ |
(89.2 |
) |
|
|
(27.2)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
|
YTD 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
464.9 |
|
|
$ |
641.0 |
|
|
$ |
(176.1 |
) |
|
|
(27.5)% |
|
Currency |
|
|
(39.7 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(39.7 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
Net sales, excluding the impact of currency |
|
$ |
504.6 |
|
|
$ |
641.0 |
|
|
$ |
(136.4 |
) |
|
|
(21.3)% |
|
|
|
The Process Industries segments net sales, excluding the effects of currency-rate changes,
decreased 27.2% in the second quarter of 2009, compared to the same period in the prior year,
primarily due to lower volume of approximately $120 million, partially offset by improved pricing
and favorable sales mix of approximately $30 million. The lower volume was seen across most market
sectors, led by a 35% decline in global metals and mining markets, a 32% decline in global wind
energy demand and a 50% decline in gear drive demand. In addition, the Companys industrial
distribution channel has experienced a 32% decline in demand. Adjusted EBIT was lower in the
second quarter of 2009 compared to the second quarter of 2008, primarily due to the impact of lower
volumes of approximately $60 million, partially offset by improved pricing and favorable sales mix
of approximately $30 million.
The Process Industries segments net sales, excluding the effects of currency-rate changes,
decreased 21.3% in the first six months of 2009, compared to the same period in the prior year,
primarily due to lower volume of approximately $200 million, partially offset by improved pricing
and favorable sales mix of approximately $60 million. The lower volume was seen across most market
sectors, led by a 28% decline in global metals and mining markets, a 34% decline in global wind
energy demand and a 30% decline in gear drive demand. In addition, the Companys industrial
distribution channel has experienced a 30% decline in demand. Adjusted EBIT was lower in the first
six months of 2009 compared to the first six months of 2008, primarily due to the impact of lower
volumes of approximately $100 million, partially offset by improved pricing and favorable sales mix
of approximately $60 million. The Company expects lower Process Industries segment sales and
adjusted EBIT for the remainder of 2009, compared to the second half of 2008, due to significantly
reduced demand across most Process Industries market sectors. In reaction to the current and
anticipated lower demand, the Process Industries segment reduced total employment levels by
approximately 1,300 positions during the first half of 2009. The Process Industries segments
sales are expected to decrease approximately 30% to 35% for the remainder of 2009 as compared to
2008 second half levels. The Company expects to continue to take actions in the Process Industries
segment to properly align its business with market demand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aerospace and Defense Segment: |
|
|
|
2Q 2009 |
|
|
2Q 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
113.2 |
|
|
$ |
105.7 |
|
|
$ |
7.5 |
|
|
|
7.1% |
|
Adjusted EBIT |
|
$ |
19.5 |
|
|
$ |
12.1 |
|
|
$ |
7.4 |
|
|
|
61.2% |
|
Adjusted EBIT margin |
|
|
17.2% |
|
|
|
11.4% |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
580 |
bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
|
YTD 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
225.8 |
|
|
$ |
207.8 |
|
|
$ |
18.0 |
|
|
|
8.7% |
|
Adjusted EBIT |
|
$ |
38.1 |
|
|
$ |
19.3 |
|
|
$ |
18.8 |
|
|
|
97.4% |
|
Adjusted EBIT margin |
|
|
16.9% |
|
|
|
9.3% |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
760 |
bps |
|
|
32
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
The presentation below reconciles the changes in net sales of the Aerospace and Defense segment
operations reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP to net sales adjusted to remove the effects of
acquisitions made in 2008 and currency exchange rates. The effects of acquisitions and currency
exchange rates are removed to allow investors and the Company to
meaningfully evaluate the percentage change in net sales on a comparable basis from period to
period. During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company completed the acquisition of the assets of
EXTEX. Acquisitions in the current year represent the increase in sales, year over year, for this
recent acquisition. The year 2008 represents the base year for which the effects of currency are
measured; as such, currency is assumed to be zero for 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2Q 2009 |
|
|
2Q 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
113.2 |
|
|
$ |
105.7 |
|
|
$ |
7.5 |
|
|
|
7.1% |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
NM |
|
Currency |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
Net sales, excluding the impact of acquisitions and currency |
|
$ |
112.5 |
|
|
$ |
105.7 |
|
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
|
|
6.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
|
YTD 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
225.8 |
|
|
$ |
207.8 |
|
|
$ |
18.0 |
|
|
|
8.7% |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
NM |
|
Currency |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
Net sales, excluding the impact of acquisitions and currency |
|
$ |
224.4 |
|
|
$ |
207.8 |
|
|
$ |
16.6 |
|
|
|
8.0% |
|
|
|
The Aerospace and Defense segments net sales, excluding the impact of acquisitions and
currency-rate changes, increased 6.4% in the second quarter of 2009, compared to the second quarter
of 2008, as a result of improved pricing and favorable sales mix of approximately $7 million.
Profitability for the second quarter of 2009, compared to the second quarter of 2008, improved
primarily due to leveraging these increases in sales with structural profitability improvements.
The Aerospace and Defense segments net sales, excluding the impact of acquisitions and
currency-rate changes, increased 8.0% in the first six months of 2009, compared to the first six
months of 2008, as a result of improved pricing and favorable sales mix of approximately $14
million. Profitability for the first six months of 2009, compared to the first six months of 2008,
improved primarily due to leveraging these increases in sales with improved manufacturing
performance. The Company expects the Aerospace and Defense segment to see a modest increase in
sales for the full year of 2009, compared to 2008, as a result of the continued integration of the
acquisition of The Purdy Corporation, acquired in October 2007, which has a strong defense oriented
profile, and the benefits from the inclusion of a full year of sales from the EXTEX acquisition.
The Aerospace and Defense segments adjusted EBIT is expected to improve slightly in 2009,
leveraging improved manufacturing performance and the integration of acquisitions. The Aerospace
and Defense segment has reduced employment by approximately 190 associates during the first half of
2009 as a result of profitability improvement initiatives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steel Segment: |
|
|
|
2Q 2009 |
|
|
2Q 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
134.8 |
|
|
$ |
518.9 |
|
|
$ |
(384.1 |
) |
|
|
(74.0)% |
|
Adjusted EBIT |
|
$ |
(32.9 |
) |
|
$ |
80.3 |
|
|
$ |
(113.2 |
) |
|
|
(141.0)% |
|
Adjusted EBIT margin |
|
|
-24.4% |
|
|
|
15.5% |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
(3,990) |
bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
|
YTD 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
383.4 |
|
|
$ |
943.9 |
|
|
$ |
(560.5 |
) |
|
|
(59.4)% |
|
Adjusted EBIT |
|
$ |
(40.2 |
) |
|
$ |
133.7 |
|
|
$ |
(173.9 |
) |
|
|
(130.1)% |
|
Adjusted EBIT margin |
|
|
-10.5% |
|
|
|
14.2% |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
(2,470) |
bps |
|
|
The presentation below reconciles the changes in net sales of the Steel segment operations reported
in accordance with U.S. GAAP to net sales adjusted to remove the effects of acquisitions made in
2008 and currency exchange rates. The effects of acquisitions and currency exchange rates are
removed to allow investors and the Company to meaningfully evaluate the percentage change in net
sales on a comparable basis from period to period. During the first quarter of 2008, the Company
completed the acquisition of the assets of BSI. Acquisitions in the current year represent the
increase in sales, year over year, for only the first quarter period for this acquisition. The
year 2008 represents the base year for which the effects of currency are measured; as such,
currency is assumed to be zero for 2008.
33
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2Q 2009 |
|
|
2Q 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
134.8 |
|
|
$ |
518.9 |
|
|
$ |
(384.1 |
) |
|
|
(74.0)% |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
NM |
|
Currency |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
Net sales, excluding the impact of acquisitions and currency |
|
$ |
136.6 |
|
|
$ |
518.9 |
|
|
$ |
(382.3 |
) |
|
|
(73.7)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
|
YTD 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
383.4 |
|
|
$ |
943.9 |
|
|
$ |
(560.5 |
) |
|
|
(59.4)% |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
NM |
|
Currency |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
Net sales, excluding the impact of acquisitions and currency |
|
$ |
379.5 |
|
|
$ |
943.9 |
|
|
$ |
(564.4 |
) |
|
|
(59.8)% |
|
|
|
The Steel segments net sales for the second quarter of 2009, excluding the effect of acquisitions
and currency-rate changes, decreased 73.7% compared to the second quarter of 2008 primarily due to
lower volume of approximately $215 million across all market sectors and lower surcharges in the
second quarter of 2009, compared to the second quarter of 2008. Surcharges decreased to $10.9
million in the second quarter of 2009 from $185.8 million in the second quarter of 2008.
Surcharges are a pricing mechanism that the Company uses to recover scrap steel, energy and certain
alloy costs, which are derived from published monthly indices. The average scrap index for the
second quarter of 2009 was $199 per ton compared to $689 per ton for the second quarter of 2008.
Steel shipments for the second quarter of 2009 were 109,816 tons, compared to 323,312 tons for the
second quarter of 2008, a decrease of 66.0%. The Steel segments average selling price, including
surcharges, was $1,194 per ton for the second quarter of 2009, compared to an average selling price
of $1,605 per ton for the second quarter of 2008. The decrease in the average selling prices was
primarily the result of lower surcharges. The lower surcharges were the result of lower prices for
certain input raw materials, especially scrap steel, natural gas, molybdenum and nickel.
The Steel segments adjusted EBIT decreased $113.2 million in the second quarter of 2009, compared
to the second quarter of 2008, primarily due to lower surcharges of $175 million, the impact of
lower sales volume of approximately $100 million and the impact of the underutilization of capacity
of approximately $35 million, partially offset by lower raw material costs of approximately $150
million and lower LIFO charges of $33 million. In the second quarter of 2009, the Steel segment
recognized LIFO income of $4 million, compared to LIFO expense of $29 million in the second quarter
of 2008. Raw material costs consumed in the manufacturing process, including scrap steel, alloys
and energy, decreased 54% in the second quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in the prior
year to an average cost of $281 per ton.
The Steel segments net sales for the first six months of 2009, excluding the effect of
acquisitions and currency-rate changes, decreased 59.8% compared to the first six months of 2008
primarily due to lower volume of approximately $315 million across all market sectors and lower
surcharges in the first six months of 2009, compared to the first six months of 2008. Surcharges
decreased to $47.7 million in the first six months of 2009 from $302.3 million in the first six
months of 2008. The average scrap index for the first six months of 2009 was $209 per ton compared
to $543 per ton for the first six months of 2008. Steel shipments for the first half of 2009 were
312,105 tons, compared to 638,241 tons for the first half of 2008, a decrease of 51%. The Steel
segments average selling price, including surcharges, was $1,217 per ton for the first six months
of 2009, compared to an average selling price of $1,479 per ton for the first six months of 2008.
The decrease in the average selling prices was primarily the result of lower surcharges. The lower
surcharges were the result of lower prices for certain input raw materials, especially scrap steel,
molybdenum and nickel.
The Steel segments adjusted EBIT decreased $173.9 million in the first six months of 2009,
compared to the first six months of 2008, primarily due to lower surcharges of $255 million, the
impact of lower sales volume of approximately $130 million and the impact of the underutilization
of capacity of approximately $65 million, partially offset by lower raw material costs of
approximately $200 million and lower LIFO charges of $61 million. In the first half of 2009, the
Steel segment recognized LIFO income of $16 million, compared to LIFO expense of $45 million in the
first half of 2008. Raw material costs consumed in the manufacturing process, including scrap
steel, alloys and energy, decreased 43% in the first six months of 2009 compared to the first six
months in the prior year to an average cost of $307 per ton.
34
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
The Company expects the Steel segment to see a 60% to 70% decrease in sales for the remainder
of 2009, compared to the second half of 2008, due to lower volume and lower average selling prices.
The lower average selling prices are driven by lower surcharges as scrap steel and alloy costs
have fallen substantially from historically high levels in 2008. The Company also expects lower
demand across most markets, primarily driven by a 65% decline in energy markets and a 50% decline
in industrial markets. The Company expects the Steel segments adjusted EBIT to be significantly
lower in 2009 primarily due to the lower average selling prices, partially offset by lower raw
material costs and related LIFO. Scrap, alloy and energy costs are expected to increase in the
near term from current levels as global industrial production improves and then levels off. As a
result of lower projected year-end 2009 scrap costs and other raw material costs, compared to
year-end 2008, as
well as lower quantities, the Steel segment expects to recognize approximately $32 million in LIFO
income for 2009. In light of the current market demands, the Steel segment reduced total
employment levels by approximately 550 positions during the first six months of 2009. The Company
will continue to take actions in the Steel segment to properly align its business with market
demand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Expense: |
|
|
|
2Q 2009 |
|
|
2Q 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Expense |
|
$ |
13.2 |
|
|
$ |
19.3 |
|
|
$ |
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
(31.6)% |
|
Corporate expense % to net sales |
|
|
1.6% |
|
|
|
1.3% |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
30 |
bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
|
YTD 2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Expense |
|
$ |
25.5 |
|
|
$ |
35.7 |
|
|
$ |
(10.2 |
) |
|
|
(28.6)% |
|
Corporate expense % to net sales |
|
|
1.4% |
|
|
|
1.2% |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
20 |
bps |
|
|
Corporate expenses decreased for the second quarter and first six months of 2009, compared to the
second quarter and first six months of 2008, as a result of lower performance-based compensation
and restructuring initiatives.
The Balance Sheet
Total assets as shown on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2009 decreased by $313.9
million from December 31, 2008. This decrease was primarily due to lower working capital as a
result of lower volumes and lower capital expenditures in 2009, partially offset by the impact of
foreign currency translation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
277.1 |
|
|
$ |
133.4 |
|
|
$ |
143.7 |
|
|
|
107.7% |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
465.1 |
|
|
|
609.4 |
|
|
|
(144.3 |
) |
|
|
(23.7)% |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
930.1 |
|
|
|
1,145.7 |
|
|
|
(215.6 |
) |
|
|
(18.8)% |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
84.8 |
|
|
|
83.4 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.7% |
|
Deferred charges and prepaid expenses |
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
42.3% |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
45.9 |
|
|
|
50.5 |
|
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
(9.1)% |
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
$ |
1,818.8 |
|
|
$ |
2,033.5 |
|
|
$ |
(214.7 |
) |
|
|
(10.6)% |
|
|
|
Refer to the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for a discussion of the increase in cash and
cash equivalents. Accounts receivable, net decreased as a result of the lower sales in the second
quarter of 2009, as compared to the fourth quarter of 2008. The decrease in inventories was
primarily due to lower volume and the Companys concerted effort to decrease inventory levels and
lower raw material costs, partially offset by the impact of foreign currency translation. Other
current assets decreased primarily due to the reduction of assets held for sale as a result of the
sale of portions of the Torrington campus, partially offset by the current year income taxes
receivable.
35
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Property, Plant and Equipment Net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
4,066.7 |
|
|
$ |
4,029.4 |
|
|
$ |
37.3 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
Less: allowances for depreciation |
|
|
(2,413.5 |
) |
|
|
(2,285.5 |
) |
|
|
(128.0 |
) |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
Property, plant and equipment - net |
|
$ |
1,653.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,743.9 |
|
|
$ |
(90.7 |
) |
|
|
(5.2 |
)% |
|
The decrease in property, plant and equipment net in the first half of 2009 was primarily due to
current-year depreciation expense exceeding capital expenditures. In addition, the impact of asset
impairments also reduced property, plant and equipment net in the first half of 2009.
Other Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
229.7 |
|
|
$ |
230.0 |
|
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
Other intangible assets |
|
|
166.3 |
|
|
|
173.7 |
|
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
|
|
(4.3 |
)% |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
312.8 |
|
|
|
315.0 |
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
)% |
Other non-current assets |
|
|
41.4 |
|
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
Total other assets |
|
$ |
750.2 |
|
|
$ |
758.7 |
|
|
$ |
(8.5 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
)% |
|
The decrease in other intangible assets was primarily due to amortization expense recognized during
the first six months of 2009.
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
68.4 |
|
|
$ |
91.5 |
|
|
$ |
(23.1 |
) |
|
|
(25.2 |
)% |
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
316.3 |
|
|
|
443.4 |
|
|
|
(127.1 |
) |
|
|
(28.7 |
)% |
Salaries, wages and benefits |
|
|
146.6 |
|
|
|
218.7 |
|
|
|
(72.1 |
) |
|
|
(33.0 |
)% |
Income taxes payable |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
|
(22.5 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
)% |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
269.3 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
252.2 |
|
|
NM |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
$ |
805.8 |
|
|
$ |
798.3 |
|
|
$ |
7.5 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
The decrease in short-term debt was primarily due to decreased net borrowings by the Companys
foreign subsidiaries under lines of credit due to lower working capital requirements. The decrease
in accounts payable and other liabilities was primarily due to lower volumes. The decrease in
accrued salaries, wages and benefits was the result of the payout of 2008 performance-based
compensation in the first quarter of 2009 and no accrued performance-based compensation for 2009.
The decrease in income taxes payable was primarily due to income tax payments during the first half
of 2009 and the benefit recognized on the current pretax loss. The resulting receivable balance in
income taxes payable was reclassified to Other current assets as of June 30, 2009. The increase in
the current portion of long-term debt was primarily due to the reclassification of the Companys
$250 million fixed-rate unsecured notes, which mature in February 2010, from non-current
liabilities to current liabilities.
36
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Non-Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
254.9 |
|
|
$ |
515.3 |
|
|
$ |
(260.4 |
) |
|
|
(50.5 |
)% |
Accrued pension cost |
|
|
844.3 |
|
|
|
844.0 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Accrued postretirement benefits cost |
|
|
609.0 |
|
|
|
613.0 |
|
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
)% |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
)% |
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
97.1 |
|
|
|
92.0 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
$ |
1,815.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,074.7 |
|
|
$ |
(259.5 |
) |
|
|
(12.5 |
)% |
|
The decrease in long-term debt was primarily due to the reclassification of the Companys $250
million fixed-rate unsecured notes, which mature in February 2010, to current liabilities.
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
$ |
888.6 |
|
|
$ |
891.4 |
|
|
$ |
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
Earnings invested in the business |
|
|
1,490.3 |
|
|
|
1,580.1 |
|
|
|
(89.8 |
) |
|
|
(5.7 |
)% |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(791.2 |
) |
|
|
(819.6 |
) |
|
|
28.4 |
|
|
|
(3.5 |
)% |
Treasury shares |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
(11.6 |
) |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
(63.8 |
)% |
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
22.4 |
% |
|
Total equity |
|
$ |
1,601.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,663.1 |
|
|
$ |
(61.9 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
)% |
|
Earnings invested in the business decreased in the first half of 2009 by a net loss of $63.6
million and dividends declared of $26.1 million. The decrease in accumulated other comprehensive
loss was primarily due to the positive impact of foreign currency translation, partially offset by
the recognition of prior-year service costs and actuarial losses for defined benefit pension and
postretirement benefit plans. The increase in the foreign currency translation adjustment of $22.5
million was due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies, such as the
Brazilian real, the British pound, the South African rand, the Czech Republic koruna and the Euro.
See Foreign Currency for further discussion regarding the impact of foreign currency translation.
Treasury shares decreased in the first half of 2009 as a result of Company utilizing these shares
for the Companys stock compensation plans. Noncontrolling interest decreased in the first half of
2009 primarily due to net losses attributable to noncontrolling interest.
Cash Flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
253.4 |
|
|
$ |
90.7 |
|
|
$ |
162.7 |
|
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
|
(49.2 |
) |
|
|
(156.2 |
) |
|
|
107.0 |
|
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(68.5 |
) |
|
|
110.2 |
|
|
|
(178.7 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
143.7 |
|
|
$ |
50.6 |
|
|
$ |
93.1 |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities increased from $90.7 million for the first six months of
2008 to $253.4 million for the first six months of 2009 as the result of higher cash provided by
working capital items, particularly inventories and accounts receivable, partially offset by lower
net income adjusted for impairment charges. Inventories provided cash of $228.0 million in the
first six months of 2009 after using cash of $122.1 million in the first six months of 2008.
Accounts receivable provided cash of $148.1 million in the first six months of 2009 after using
cash of $132.8 million in the first six months of 2008. Inventories and accounts receivable
provided cash in the first half of 2009 primarily due to lower
volumes and the Companys concerted effort to
improve working capital. Accounts payable and accrued expenses, including income taxes, were a use
of cash of $231.1 million for the first six months of 2009 after providing cash of $52.1 million
for the first six months of 2008. Net income, adjusted for impairment charges, decreased $201.8
million in the first half of 2009, compared to the first half of 2008.
37
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
The net cash used by investing activities of $49.2 million for the first six months of 2009
decreased from the same period in 2008 primarily due to lower capital expenditures in the current
year and lower acquisition activity, partially offset by lower proceeds from disposals of property,
plant and equipment. Capital expenditures decreased $72.8 million in the first six months of 2009,
compared to the first six months of 2008. The Company expects to decrease capital expenditures by
approximately 50% in 2009, compared to 2008 levels, in response to the current economic downturn.
Cash used for acquisitions decreased $56.6 million in 2009, compared to the same period in 2008,
primarily due to the acquisition of the assets of BSI in 2008. Proceeds from the disposal of
property, plant and equipment decreased $25.9 million primarily due to the sale of the Companys
former seamless steel tube manufacturing facility located in Desford, England for approximately
$28.0 million during the first quarter of 2008.
The net cash flows from financing activities used cash of $68.5 million in the first half of 2009
after providing cash of $110.1 million in the first half of 2008, as a result of the Company
decreasing its net borrowings by $169.5 million in light of cash provided from operations during
the first six months of 2009 and lower acquisition activity, as well as lower capital expenditures.
In addition, net proceeds from common share activity decreased $15.7 million for the first six
months of 2009 compared to the first six months of 2008 as a result of fewer exercises of the
Companys outstanding stock options, partially offset by lower cash dividends paid to shareholders
of $6.6 million in the first six months of 2009, compared to the first six months of 2008, as a result
of the Company cutting its quarterly dividend beginning in the second quarter of 2009.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Total debt was $592.6 million at June 30, 2009, compared to $623.9 million at December 31, 2008.
Net debt was $315.5 million at June 30, 2009, compared to $490.5 million at December 31, 2008. The
net debt to capital ratio was 16.5% at June 30, 2009, compared to 22.8% at December 31, 2008.
Reconciliation of total debt to net debt and the ratio of net debt to capital:
Net Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
68.4 |
|
|
$ |
91.5 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
269.3 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
254.9 |
|
|
|
515.3 |
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
592.6 |
|
|
|
623.9 |
|
Less: cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(277.1 |
) |
|
|
(133.4 |
) |
|
Net debt |
|
$ |
315.5 |
|
|
$ |
490.5 |
|
|
Ratio of Net Debt to Capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt |
|
$ |
315.5 |
|
|
$ |
490.5 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
1,601.2 |
|
|
|
1,663.1 |
|
|
Net debt + shareholders equity (capital) |
|
$ |
1,916.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,153.6 |
|
|
Ratio of net debt to capital |
|
|
16.5% |
|
|
|
22.8% |
|
The Company presents net debt because it believes net debt is more representative of the Companys
financial position.
At June 30, 2009, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the Companys Asset
Securitization, which provides for borrowings up to $175 million, subject to certain borrowing base
limitations, and is secured by certain domestic trade receivables of the Company. As of June 30,
2009, although the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the Asset Securitization, certain
borrowing base limitations reduced the availability under the Asset Securitization to $75.4
million.
38
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
At June 30, 2009, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under its then existing $500 million
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (former Senior Credit Facility) but had letters of credit
outstanding totaling $39.2 million, which reduced the availability under the former Senior Credit
Facility to $460.8 million. Under the former Senior Credit Facility, the Company had two financial
covenants: a consolidated leverage ratio and a consolidated interest coverage ratio. At June 30,
2009, the Company was in full compliance with the covenants under the former Senior Credit Facility
and its other debt agreements. The maximum consolidated leverage ratio permitted under the former
Senior Credit Facility was 3.0 to 1.0. At of June 30, 2009, the Companys consolidated leverage
ratio was 1.48 to 1.0. The minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio permitted under the former
Senior Credit Facility was 2.0 to 1.0. As of June 30, 2009, the Companys consolidated interest
coverage ratio was 7.12 to 1.0. Were the Company to have borrowed the remaining balances available
under both the Senior Credit Facility and the Companys Asset Securitization, the Company would
still have been in full compliance with the covenants under the former Senior Credit Facility and
its other debt agreements as of June 30, 2009. Refer to Note 7 Financing Arrangements for
further discussion.
On July 10, 2009, the Company entered into a new $500 million Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
(new Senior Credit Facility). This new Senior Credit Facility replaces the former Senior Credit
Facility, which was due to expire on June 30, 2010. The new Senior Credit Facility matures on July
10, 2012. Under the new Senior Credit Facility, the Company has three financial covenants: a
consolidated leverage ratio, a consolidated interest coverage ratio and a consolidated minimum
tangible net worth test. These covenants are effective with the Companys quarter ended September
30, 2009. The Company expects to be in compliance with these new covenants throughout the term of
the new Senior Credit Facility. However, in order to remain in compliance, the Company may
need to limit its borrowings under the new Senior Credit Facility or other facilities.
The interest rate under the new Senior Credit Facility is based on a spread based on grid pricing
determined by the Companys consolidated leverage ratio. In addition, the Company will pay a
facility fee based on the consolidated leverage ratio times the aggregate commitments of all of the
lenders under this agreement. Financing costs on the new Senior Credit Facility will be amortized
over the life of the new agreement and is expected to result in approximately $2.9 million in
annual interest expense.
The Company expects that any cash requirements in excess of cash generated from operating
activities will be met by the committed funds available under its Asset Securitization and the new
Senior Credit Facility, which totaled $536.2 million as of June 30, 2009. The Company believes it
has sufficient liquidity to meet its obligations through at least the middle of 2012.
Other sources of liquidity include lines of credit for certain of the Companys foreign
subsidiaries, which provide for borrowings up to $370.8 million. The majority of these lines are
uncommitted. At June 30, 2009, the Company had borrowings outstanding of $68.4 million, which
reduced the availability under these facilities to $302.4 million.
In the third quarter of 2008, Moodys Investors Service increased Timkens corporate credit rating
to Baa3, which is considered investment-grade, reflecting the Companys improved financial
condition. This rating is consistent with the Companys investment-grade rating from Standard &
Poors Ratings Services (BBB-).
The Company has $250 million of fixed-rate unsecured notes which mature in February 2010. The
current credit shortage affecting the world economy may impact the availability of credit
throughout 2009 and is expected to result in higher financing costs on any new note issuances. The
Company plans to refinance the unsecured notes in advance of their maturities, but expects
financing costs to be higher than the current notes.
The Company expects to continue to generate cash from operations due to lower working capital
levels, as well as lower income taxes and reduced selling, administrative and general expenses. In
addition, the Company expects to decrease capital expenditures by 50% in 2009, compared to 2008.
The Company also expects to make $20 million to $25 million of pension contributions in 2009,
compared to $22.1 million in 2008. The Company may make additional discretionary U.S. pension
contributions before the end of 2009.
The Company may take further actions to reduce expenses and preserve liquidity beyond the actions
announced to-date as it reacts to the current global economic and financial crisis. In addition,
further actions may be taken to reduce expenses in order to optimize the size of the Company as a
result of the economy and current and anticipated market demand. However, these actions are not
expected to have a material impact on the liquidity of the Company.
39
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Financing Obligations and Other Commitments
The Company currently expects to make cash contributions to its global defined benefit pension
plans of $20 million to $25 million in 2009. However, consistent with past practice, the Company
may make additional discretionary pension contributions before the end of 2009. Returns for the
Companys global defined benefit pension plan assets in 2008 were significantly below the expected
rate of return assumption of 8.75 percent, due to broad declines in global equity markets. These
unfavorable returns negatively impacted the funded status of the plans at the end of 2008 and are
expected to result in significant pension contributions over the next several years. The decrease
in global defined benefit pension assets in 2008 is expected to increase pension expense by
approximately $15 million in 2009 and may significantly impact future pension expense beyond 2009.
Returns for the Companys U.S. defined benefit pension plan assets for the first half of 2009 were
approximately 6.0%, primarily due to positive performance in the global equity markets.
During the first six months of 2009, the Company did not purchase any shares of its common stock as
authorized under the Companys 2006 common stock purchase plan. This plan authorizes the Company
to buy, in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, up to four million shares of
common stock, which are to be held as treasury shares and used for specified purposes, up to an
aggregate of $180 million. The authorization expires on December 31, 2012.
The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements with unconsolidated entities or other
persons.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements:
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements. SFAS No. 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value that is based on the
assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair
value hierarchy that prioritizes the information to develop those assumptions. Additionally, the
standard expands the disclosures about fair value measurements to include separately disclosing the
fair value measurements of assets or liabilities within each level of the fair value hierarchy. In
February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB
Statement No. 157. FSP FAS 157-2 delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The
implementation of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, effective
January 1, 2009, did not have a material impact on the Companys results of operations and
financial condition.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS No.
141(R)). SFAS No. 141(R) provides revised guidance on how acquirers recognize and measure the
consideration transferred, identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, noncontrolling
interest and goodwill acquired in a business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) also expands required
disclosures surrounding the nature and financial effects of business combinations. SFAS No. 141(R)
is effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The
implementation of SFAS No. 141(R), effective January 1, 2009, did not have a material impact on the
Companys results of operations and financial condition.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160. SFAS No. 160 establishes requirements for
ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the Company (sometimes called
minority interests) to be clearly identified, presented, and disclosed in the consolidated statement
of financial position within equity, but separate from the parents equity. All changes in the
parents ownership interests are required to be accounted for consistently as equity transactions
and any noncontrolling equity investments in deconsolidated subsidiaries must be measured initially
at fair value. SFAS No. 160 is effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008. However, presentation and disclosure requirements must be retrospectively
applied to comparative financial statements. The implementation of SFAS No. 160, effective January
1, 2009, did not have a material impact on the Companys results of operations and financial
condition.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS No. 161 requires entities to provide
greater transparency through additional disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative
instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS
No. 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and its related
interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys
financial position, results of operations and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The
implementation of SFAS No. 161, effective January 1, 2009, expanded the disclosures on derivative
instruments and related hedged item and did not have a material impact on the Companys results of
operations and financial condition. See Note 16 Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
for the expanded disclosures.
40
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in
Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities. FSP No. EITF 03-6-1 clarifies that
unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to receive nonforfeitable dividends are
participating securities. FSP No. EITF 03-6-1 provides guidance on how to allocate earnings to
participating securities and compute earnings per share using the two-class method. FSP No. EITF
03-6-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2008, and interim periods within
those fiscal years. FSP No. EITF 03-6-1 did not have a material impact on the Companys disclosure
of earnings per share. See Note 10 Earnings Per Share for the computation of earnings per
share using the two-class method.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events. SFAS No. 165 establishes general
standards of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but
before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS No. 165 is effective
for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009 and was adopted by the Company
in the second quarter of 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 165 did not have a material impact on the
Companys results of operations and financial condition.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements:
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1, Employers Disclosures about Postretirement
Benefit Plan Assets. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 requires the disclosure of additional information about
investment allocation, fair values of major categories of assets, development of fair value
measurements and concentrations of risk. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 is effective for fiscal years ending
after December 15, 2009. The adoption of FSP FAS 132(R)-1 is not expected to have a material
impact on the Companys results of operations and financial condition.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates:
The Companys financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
periods presented. The Company reviews its critical accounting policies throughout the year.
Except for the following critical accounting policies on Inventory and Goodwill, the Company has
concluded that there have been no changes to its critical accounting policies or estimates, as
described in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, during the six
months ended June 30, 2009.
Inventory:
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market, with approximately 48% valued by the
last-in, first-out (LIFO) method and the remaining 52% valued by the first-in, first-out (FIFO)
method. The majority of the Companys domestic inventories are valued by the LIFO method and all
of the Companys international (outside the United States) inventories are valued by the FIFO
method. An actual valuation of the inventory under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of
each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO
calculations must be based on managements estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and
costs. Because these are subject to many factors beyond managements control, annual results may
differ from interim results as they are subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation.
The Companys Steel segment recognized $16.2 million in LIFO income for the six months ended June
30, 2009, compared to LIFO expense of $45.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Based
on current expectations of inventory levels and costs, the Steel segment expects to recognize
approximately $32.4 million in LIFO income for the year ended December 31, 2009. The expected
reduction in the LIFO reserve for 2009 is a result of lower costs, especially scrap steel costs, as
well as lower quantities. A 1.0% increase in costs would reduce the current LIFO income estimate
for 2009 by $1.4 million. A 1.0% increase in inventory quantities would reduce the current LIFO
income estimate for 2009 by $0.5 million.
Goodwill:
The Company tests goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually.
The Company performs its annual impairment test during the fourth quarter after the annual
forecasting process is completed. Furthermore, goodwill is reviewed for impairment whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Each interim
period, management of the Company assesses whether or not an indicator of impairment is present
that would necessitate that a goodwill impairment analysis be performed in an interim period other
than during the fourth quarter.
The goodwill impairment analysis is a two-step process. Step one compares the carrying amount of
the reporting unit to its estimated fair value. To the extent that the carrying value of the
reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, step two is performed, where the reporting units
carrying value of goodwill is compared to the implied fair value of goodwill. To the extent that
the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill, impairment exists and
must be
recognized.
41
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
The Company reviews goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level. The Companys reporting
units are the same as its reportable segments: Mobile Industries, Process Industries, Aerospace
and Defense and Steel. The Company prepares its goodwill impairment analysis by comparing the
estimated fair value of each reporting unit, using an income approach (a discounted cash flow
model) as well as a market approach, with its carrying value. The income approach and the market
approach are equally weighted in arriving at fair value, which the Company has applied
consistently.
The discounted cash flow model requires several assumptions including future sales growth, EBIT
(earnings before interest and taxes) margins and capital expenditures. The Companys four
reporting units each provide their forecast of results for the next three years. These forecasts
are the basis for the information used in the discounted cash flow model. The discounted cash flow
model also requires the use of a discount rate and a terminal revenue growth rate (the revenue
growth rate for the period beyond the three years forecasted by the reporting units), as well as
projections of future operating margins (for the period beyond the forecasted three years). During
the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company used a discount rate for each of its four reporting units
ranging from 11% to 12% and a terminal revenue growth rate ranging from 2% to 3%. The difference
in the discount rates and terminal revenue growth rates is based on the underlying markets and
risks associated with each of the Companys reporting units.
The market approach requires several assumptions including sales multiples and EBITDA (earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) multiples for comparable companies that
operate in the same markets as the Companys reporting units. During the fourth quarter of 2008,
the Company used sales multiples for its four reporting units ranging from 0.4 to 1.0 and EBITDA
multiples ranging from 3.8 to 8.0. The difference in the sales multiples and the EBITDA multiples
is due to the underlying markets associated with each of the Companys reporting units.
As a result of the goodwill impairment analysis performed during the fourth quarter of 2008, the
Company recognized a goodwill impairment loss of $48.8 million for the Mobile Industries segment in
its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008. The fair value of each of the
Companys other reporting units exceeded its carrying value. As of December 31, 2008, the Company
had $230.0 million of goodwill on its Consolidated Balance Sheet, of which $167.6 million was
attributable to the Aerospace and Defense segment. See Note 8 Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets in the Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008 for carrying amount of goodwill by
segment. The Aerospace and Defense segment is the only reporting unit in which the fair value of
the reporting unit did not exceed the carrying value of the reporting unit by more than 10%. The
fair value of this reporting unit was $445.9 million compared to a carrying value of $436.2
million. A 40 basis point increase in the discount rate would have resulted in the Aerospace and
Defense segment failing step one of the goodwill impairment analysis, which would have required the
completion of step two of the goodwill impairment analysis to arrive at a potential goodwill
impairment loss. A 450 basis point decrease in the projected cash flows would have resulted in the
Aerospace and Defense segment failing step one of the goodwill impairment analysis, which would
have required the completion of step two of the goodwill impairment analysis to arrive at a
potential goodwill impairment loss.
Other Matters:
Foreign Currency:
Assets and liabilities of subsidiaries are translated at the rate of exchange in effect on the
balance sheet date; income and expenses are translated at the average rates of exchange prevailing
during the quarter. Related translation adjustments are reflected as a separate component of
accumulated other comprehensive loss. Foreign currency gains and losses resulting from
transactions are included in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
Foreign currency exchange losses included in the Companys operating results for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 were $1.1 million, compared to a gain of $1.4 million during the three months
ended June 30, 2008. Foreign currency exchange gains included in the Companys operating results
for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were $5.2 million, compared to a loss of $1.5 million during
the six months ended June 30, 2008. For the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Company recorded
a positive non-cash foreign currency translation adjustment of $67.1 million that increased
shareholders equity, compared to a positive non-cash foreign currency translation adjustment of
$12.5 million that increased shareholders equity for the three months ended June 30, 2008. For
the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company recorded a positive non-cash foreign currency
translation adjustment of $22.5 million that increased shareholders equity, compared to a positive
non-cash foreign currency translation adjustment of $41.2 million that increased shareholders
equity in the six months ended June 30, 2008. The foreign currency translation adjustments for the
three months and six months ended June 30, 2009 were positively impacted by the weakening of the
U.S. dollar relative to other currencies, such as the Brazilian real, the British pound, the South
African rand, the Czech Republic koruna and the Euro.
Quarterly Dividend:
On August 4, 2009, the Companys Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.09 per
share. The dividend
will be paid on September 3, 2009 to shareholders of record as of August 21, 2009. This will be
the 349th consecutive dividend paid on the common stock of the Company.
42
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements set forth in this document (including the Companys forecasts, beliefs and
expectations) that are not historical in nature are forward-looking statements within the meaning
of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In particular, the Managements
Discussion and Analysis contains numerous forward-looking statements. The Company cautions readers
that actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in forward-looking
statements made by or on behalf of the Company due to a variety of important factors, such as:
a) |
|
continued weakness in world economic conditions, including additional adverse effects from
the global economic slowdown, terrorism or hostilities. This includes, but is not limited to,
political risks associated with the potential instability of governments and legal systems in
countries in which the Company or its customers conduct business, and changes in currency
valuations; |
|
b) |
|
the effects of fluctuations in customer demand on sales, product mix and prices in the
industries in which the Company operates. This includes the ability of the Company to respond
to the rapid changes in customer demand, the effects of customer bankruptcies or liquidations,
the impact of changes in industrial business cycles and whether conditions of fair trade
continue in the U.S. markets; |
|
c) |
|
competitive factors, including changes in market penetration, increasing price competition by
existing or new foreign and domestic competitors, the introduction of new products by existing
and new competitors and new technology that may impact the way the Companys products are sold
or distributed; |
|
d) |
|
changes in operating costs. This includes: the effect of changes in the Companys
manufacturing processes; changes in costs associated with varying levels of operations and
manufacturing capacity; higher cost and availability of raw materials and energy; the
Companys ability to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in raw materials and energy costs and
the operation of the Companys surcharge mechanism; changes in the expected costs associated
with product warranty claims; changes resulting from inventory management and cost reduction
initiatives and different levels of customer demands; the effects of unplanned work stoppages;
and changes in the cost of labor and benefits; |
|
e) |
|
the success of the Companys operating plans, including its ability to achieve the benefits
from its ongoing continuous improvement and rationalization programs; the ability of acquired
companies to achieve satisfactory operating results; and the Companys ability to maintain
appropriate relations with unions that represent Company associates in certain locations in
order to avoid disruptions of business; |
|
f) |
|
unanticipated litigation, claims or assessments. This includes, but is not limited to,
claims or problems related to intellectual property, product liability or warranty,
environmental issues, and taxes; |
|
g) |
|
changes in worldwide financial markets, including availability of financing and interest
rates to the extent they affect the Companys ability to raise capital or increase the
Companys cost of funds, including the ability to refinance its unsecured notes, have an
impact on the overall performance of the Companys pension fund investments and/or cause
changes in the global economy and financial markets which affect customer demand and the
ability of customers to obtain financing to purchase the Companys products or equipment which
contains the Companys products; |
|
h) |
|
the Companys ability to
sucessfully complete the sale of its Needle Roller Bearings
operations; and |
|
i) |
|
those items identified under Item 1A. Risk Factors in this document, in the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 and in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008. |
Additional risks relating to the Companys business, the industries in which the Company operates
or the Companys common stock may be described from time to time in the Companys filings with the
SEC. All of these risk factors are difficult to predict, are subject to material uncertainties
that may affect actual results and may be beyond the Companys control.
Except as required by the federal securities laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly
update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
43
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
|
Refer to information appearing under the caption Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Form 10-Q. Furthermore, a
discussion of market risk exposures is included in Part II, Item 7A. Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk, of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008. There have been no material changes in reported market
risk since the inclusion of this discussion in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
referenced above. |
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
|
(a) |
|
Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
|
|
|
|
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an
evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys
management, including the Companys principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)).
Based upon that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial
officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting |
|
|
|
|
During the Companys most recent fiscal quarter, there have been no changes in the
Companys internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. |
44
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company is involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course
of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters is not
expected to have a materially adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 included a detailed discussion of
our risk factors. The information presented below amends and updates those risk factors and
should be read in conjunction with the risk factors and information disclosed in the Form
10-K and the Form 10-Q.
Continued weakness in either global economic conditions or in any of the industries in which
our customers operate or sustained uncertainty in financial markets could adversely impact
our revenues and profitability by reducing demand and margins.
Our results of operations may be materially affected by the conditions in the global economy
generally and in global capital markets. The current global economic downturn has caused
extreme volatility in the capital markets and in the end markets in which our customers
operate. Our revenues may be negatively affected by continued reduced customer demand,
additional changes in the product mix and negative pricing pressure in the industries in
which we operate. Margins in those industries are highly sensitive to demand cycles, and
our customers in those industries historically have tended to delay large capital projects,
including expensive maintenance and upgrades, during economic downturns. As a result, our
revenues and earnings are impacted by overall levels of industrial production.
Our results of operations may be materially affected by the conditions in the global
financial markets. If an end user cannot obtain financing to purchase our products, either
directly or indirectly contained in machinery or equipment, demand for our products will be
reduced, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and earnings.
Certain automotive industry companies are experiencing significant financial downturns.
During the second quarter of 2009, both General Motors Corp. and
Chrysler LLC filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection in the United States. While these bankruptcies did not result in any
material losses to the Company, if any other automotive industry customers become insolvent
or file for bankruptcy, our ability to recover accounts receivable from that customer would
be adversely affected and any payment we received during the preference period prior to a
bankruptcy filing may be potentially recoverable by the bankruptcy estate. Furthermore, if
certain of our automotive industry customers liquidate in bankruptcy, we may incur
impairment charges relating to obsolete inventory and machinery and equipment. In addition,
financial instability of certain companies that participate in the automotive industry
supply chain could disrupt production in the industry. A disruption of production in the
automotive industry could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and
earnings.
We may incur further impairment and restructuring charges that could materially affect our
profitability.
We have taken approximately $212 million in impairment and restructuring charges, during the
last four years, for the Canton bearing operations, Mobile Industries segment, Bearings and
Power Transmission Group and employment and other cost reduction initiatives. We expect to
take additional charges in connection with the Canton bearing operations, the Mobile
Industries segment, and the employment and cost reduction initiatives. Continued weakness
in business or economic conditions, or changes in our business strategy, may result in
additional restructuring programs and may require us to take additional charges in the
future, which could have a material adverse effect on our earnings.
45
The unprecedented conditions in the financial and credit markets may affect the availability
and cost of credit.
The Company has $250 million of fixed-rate unsecured notes which mature in February 2010.
The Company plans to refinance the unsecured notes in advance of their maturity.
The financial and credit markets are experiencing unprecedented levels of volatility and
disruption, which has impacted the general availability of credit and resulted in
significantly higher financing costs. If we are unable to issue debt or obtain
credit as we need it, including refinancing our unsecured notes, our liquidity and ability
to operate our business may be adversely impacted.
We may not be able to maintain compliance with the covenants contained in our debt
agreement.
We reported a net loss for the second quarter and first six months of 2009. The U.S. and
global industrial manufacturing downturn deepened during 2009 and contributed to a decrease
in our sales and profitability. We cannot foresee whether our operations will generate
sufficient revenue for us to attain profitability in the future, and we may not be able to
reduce fixed costs sufficiently to improve our operating ratios.
In addition, our new Senior Credit Facility contains financial covenants that require us to
achieve certain financial and operating results and maintain compliance with specified
financial ratios. In particular, our new Senior Credit Facility contains requirements
relating to a maximum consolidated leverage ratio, a minimum consolidated interest coverage
ratio and a minimum consolidated net worth. These covenants could, among other
things, limit our ability to borrow against the new Senior Credit Facility
or other facilities. Further, our ability
to meet the financial covenants or requirements in our new Senior Credit Facility may be
affected by events beyond our control, and we may not be able to satisfy such covenants and
requirements. A breach of these covenants or our inability to comply with the financial
ratios, tests or other restrictions could result in an event of default under our new Senior
Credit Facility, which in turn could result in an event of default under the terms of our
other indebtedness. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under
our new Senior Credit
Facility, after the expiration of any grace periods, the lenders could elect to declare all
amounts outstanding under our new Senior Credit Facility, together with accrued interest, to be
immediately due and payable. If this happens, our assets may not be sufficient to repay in
full the payments due under that facility or our other indebtedness.
In addition, if we are unable to service our indebtedness or fund our operating costs, we
will be forced to adopt alternative strategies that may include:
|
|
|
further reducing or delaying capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
|
seeking additional debt financing or equity capital, possibly at a higher cost to
us or have other terms that are less attractive to us than would otherwise be the
case; |
|
|
|
|
selling assets; |
|
|
|
|
restructuring or refinancing debt, which may increase further our financing
costs; or |
|
|
|
|
curtailing or eliminating certain activities. |
Moreover, we may not be able to implement any of these strategies on satisfactory terms, if
at all.
Work stoppages or similar difficulties could significantly disrupt our operations, reduce
our revenues and materially affect our earnings.
The collective bargaining agreement covering substantially all of our hourly employees in
the Canton, Ohio bearing and steel plants and expires on September 28, 2009. The steel
plants covered by this agreement constitute substantially all of our steel manufacturing,
tube making and processing operations. A work stoppage at one or more of our facilities
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations. Also, if one or more of our customers were to experience a work stoppage, that
customer would likely halt or limit purchases of our products, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
46
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Issuer of Purchases of Common Stock
The following table provides information about purchases by the Company during the quarter
ended June 30, 2009 of its common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of shares |
|
|
number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
purchased as |
|
|
shares that |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
part of publicly |
|
|
may yet |
|
|
|
Total number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
announced |
|
|
be purchased |
|
|
|
of shares |
|
|
price paid |
|
|
plans or |
|
|
under the plans |
|
Period |
|
purchased(1) |
|
|
per share(2) |
|
|
programs |
|
|
or programs(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
04/01/09 - 04/30/09 |
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
$15.79 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
05/01/09 - 05/31/09 |
|
|
3,071 |
|
|
|
16.66 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
06/01/09 - 06/30/09 |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
16.95 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,620 |
|
|
|
$16.56 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents shares of the Companys common stock that are owned and tendered by employees to
satisfy tax
withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted shares and the exercise of stock options. |
|
(2) |
|
For restricted shares, the average price paid per share is calculated using the daily high and
low of the Companys
common stock as quoted on the New York Stock Exchange at the time of vesting. For stock options, the price
paid is the real time trading stock price at the time the options are exercised. |
|
(3) |
|
Pursuant to the Companys 2006 common stock purchase plan, the Company may purchase up to four
million shares
of common stock at an amount not to exceed $180 million in the aggregate. The Company may purchase shares
under its 2006 common stock purchase plan until December 31, 2012. |
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
At the 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of The Timken Company held on May 12, 2009, the
shareholders of the Company elected the four individuals set forth below as Directors in
Class III to serve a term of three years expiring at the Annual Meeting in 2012 (or until
their respective successors are elected and qualified).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affirmative Votes |
|
Withheld Votes |
Joseph W. Ralston |
|
|
50,812,015 |
|
|
|
39,365,195 |
|
John P. Reilly |
|
|
58,589,114 |
|
|
|
31,588,096 |
|
John M. Timken, Jr. |
|
|
50,657,831 |
|
|
|
39,519,379 |
|
Jacqueline F. Woods |
|
|
50,759,275 |
|
|
|
39,417,935 |
|
The shareholders of the Company ratified the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as Timkens
independent auditor for the year ending December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affirmative |
|
Negative |
|
Abstain |
|
85,892,495
|
|
4,008,083
|
|
276,632 |
|
The shareholders of the Company approved a shareholder proposal requesting that Timkens
Articles of Incorporation be amended to provide that director nominees be elected by a
majority of the votes cast at an annual meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affirmative |
|
Negative |
|
Abstain |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
43,006,926
|
|
40,708,941
|
|
568,395
|
|
5,892,948 |
47
Item 6. Exhibits
|
12 |
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to
Fixed Charges. |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of James W. Griffith, President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer) of The Timken Company, pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Glenn A. Eisenberg, Executive Vice President Finance and
Administration (principal financial officer) of The Timken Company, pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32 |
|
Certifications of James W. Griffith, President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer) and Glenn A. Eisenberg, Executive Vice President
Finance and Administration (principal financial officer) of The Timken Company,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
48
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE TIMKEN COMPANY |
|
|
|
|
|
Date August 5, 2009 |
By /s/ James W. Griffith
|
|
|
|
|
|
James W. Griffith |
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date August 5, 2009 |
By /s/ Glenn A. Eisenberg
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glenn A. Eisenberg |
|
|
Executive Vice President - Finance
and Administration (Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|