Form 6-K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-16 OR 15D-16 OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the month of January 2012
Commission File Number: 001-13944
NORDIC AMERICAN TANKERS LIMITED
(Translation of registrant’s name into English
LOM Building, 27 Reid Street, Hamilton, HM 11,
Bermuda
(Address of principal executive
office)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Form
20-F x Form 40-F ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):
¨
Note: Regulation
S-T Rule 101(b) (1) only permits the submission in paper of a Form 6-K if submitted solely to provide an attached annual report to security holders.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):
¨.
Note: Regulation
S-T Rule 101(b)(7) only permits the submission in paper of a Form 6-K if submitted to furnish a report or other document that the registrant foreign private issuer must furnish and make public under the laws of the jurisdiction in which the
registrant is incorporated, domiciled or legally organized (the registrant’s “home country”), or under the rules of the home country exchange on which the registrant’s securities are traded, as long as the report or other
document is not a press release, is not required to be and has not been distributed to the registrant’s security holders, and, if discussing a material event, has already been the subject of a Form 6-K submission or other Commission filing on
EDGAR.
INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FORM 6-K REPORT
Attached as Exhibit 1 are management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations and the condensed financial statements of Nordic American
Tankers Limited (the “Company”), as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
This Report on Form 6-K is hereby incorporated by reference into the
Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-3 ASR (Registration No. 333-162171) filed on September 28, 2009.
EXHIBIT 1
NORDIC AMERICAN TANKERS LIMITED (NAT)
As used herein, “we,” “us,” “our” and “the Company” all refer to Nordic American Tankers Limited. This management’s
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read together with the discussion included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
General
Nordic American Tankers Limited was formed on June 12, 1995 under the laws of the Island of Bermuda.
We were formed for the purpose of acquiring and chartering double-hull tankers. We are an international tanker company that currently owns 20 Suezmax tankers. In the autumn of 2004, the Company owned three vessels; at the end of 2005 the Company
owned eight vessels; and at the end of 2006 the Company owned 12 vessels. At the end of 2009 and 2010 we had 15 vessels in operation. We expect that the expansion process will continue over time and that more vessels will be added to our
fleet.
The 20 vessels we currently operate average approximately 156,000 dwt each. We chartered all of our operating vessels in the spot market with Gemini Tankers LLC in 2011, until
November 24, 2011, when we entered into a spot market arrangement with Orion Tankers Ltd. (“Orion Tankers”). In 2010 we had chartered two of our 17 operating vessels on bareboat charters that expired in June 2010, and October 2010,
respectively. The Nordic Harrier (former Gulf Scandic) was redelivered to the Company in October 2010 and went directly into drydock for repairs. The drydock period was completed late April 2011, and the vessel was employed in the spot market
pursuant to cooperative arrangements on May 1, 2011.
Our Fleet
Our current fleet consists of 20 modern double-hull Suezmax tankers of
which two are newbuildings delivered in 2011. All our vessels are employed in the spot market. The following table provides information regarding the status of each vessel.
Vessel |
Yard |
Built |
Dwt (1) |
Delivered to NAT |
Nordic Hawk |
Samsung |
1997 |
151,475 |
October 1997 |
Nordic Hunter |
Samsung |
1997 |
151,400 |
December 1997 |
Nordic Freedom
|
Daewoo |
2005 |
163,455 |
March 2005 |
Nordic Voyager
|
Dalian New |
1997 |
149,591 |
November 2004 |
Nordic Fighter
|
Hyundai |
1998 |
153,328 |
March 2005 |
Nordic Discovery
|
Hyundai |
1998 |
153,328 |
August 2005 |
Nordic Sprite |
Samsung |
1999 |
147,188 |
February 2009 |
Nordic Grace |
Hyundai |
2002 |
149,921 |
July 2009 |
Nordic Harrier
|
Samsung |
1997 |
151,475 |
August 1997 |
Nordic Saturn |
Daewoo |
1998 |
157,332 |
November 2005 |
Nordic Jupiter
|
Daewoo |
1998 |
157,411 |
April 2006 |
Nordic Apollo |
Samsung |
2003 |
159,999 |
November 2006 |
Nordic Cosmos |
Samsung |
2003 |
159,998 |
December 2006 |
Nordic Moon |
Samsung |
2002 |
159,999 |
November 2006 |
Nordic Mistral
|
Hyundai |
2002 |
164,236 |
November 2009 |
Nordic Passat |
Hyundai |
2002 |
164,274 |
March 2010 |
Nordic Vega |
Bohai |
2010 |
163,000 |
December 2010 |
Nordic Breeze |
Samsung |
2011 |
158,597 |
August 2011 |
Nordic Aurora |
Samsung |
1999 |
147,262 |
September 2011 |
Nordic Zenith |
Samsung |
2011 |
158,645 |
November 2011 |
Recent
Developments
In October 2010, Nordic Harrier was
redelivered, from a long-term bareboat charter agreement, to the Company, and went directly into drydock for repair. The drydock period lasted until the end of April 2011. The vessel had not been technically operated according to sound maintenance
practices by Gulf Navigation Company LLC, and the vessel’s condition on redelivery to us was far below the contractual obligation of the charterer. All drydock expenses are capitalized and were paid as of September 30, 2011. We have sought
compensation for these expenses, but have not been able to reach an agreement with the charterer. The arbitration procedures have started and are expected to be finalized in 2012.
In August 2010, we did not take delivery of the first of the two newbuilding vessels we agreed to acquire on November 5, 2007, because the vessel in our judgment was not in a
deliverable condition as stipulated under the Memorandum of Agreement between the Company and the Seller. The Seller, a subsidiary of First Olsen Ltd, did not agree with the Company and the parties commenced arbitration procedures which took place
in London in October and November 2011. According to the first partial award received on November 18, 2011, the vessel was found to be in a deliverable condition in August 2010. The Seller originally claimed $26.8 million in compensation
however the first partial award was limited to $16.2 million. The compensation of $16.2 million has been recognized as a subsequent event in our interim statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, and will not affect the
Company’s net cash flow. As a consequence of the first partial award, the Seller is required to repay to us the outstanding loan balance as of November 18, 2011 which is equal to $19.3 million. On January 17, 2012, we received the final award
and as a consequence we shall be responsible for some of the legal costs of the Seller. See note 11 in the notes to the accompanying interim financial statements for further details.
In February 2011, the Board of Directors adopted a new equity incentive plan, pursuant to which a total of 400,000 restricted shares were reserved for issuance
and have been allocated among 23 persons employed in the management of the Company, including the Manager and the members of the Board.
On June 1, 2011, at our Annual General Meeting (“AGM”) held in Bermuda, our amended and restated bye-laws were approved and adopted. We increased our authorized share
capital from 51,200,000 common shares to 90,000,000 common shares, par value $0.01 per share. Currently, 47,303,394 common shares are issued and outstanding. We also changed our legal name to Nordic American Tankers Limited.
In November 2011, the Company took delivery of the second of the two newbuildings from Samsung Heavy Industries Co. Ltd, the Nordic Zenith which we agreed to acquire on April 30,
2010. The vessel was financed by the resources of the Company
In November 2011, the Company’s board of directors declared a
dividend of $0.30 per share for the third quarter of 2011. The dividend was paid on December 2, 2011 to shareholders of record as of November 23, 2011.
In November 2011, the Orion Tankers pool was established, with Orion Tankers Ltd. as pool manager. This company is owned equally by us and Frontline Ltd. (NYSE:FRO). In
mid-November 2011, our vessels were transferred from the Gemini Tankers LLC arrangement to the Orion Tankers pool upon completion of previously fixed charters within Gemini Tankers LLC.
Effective December 1, 2011, we amended the Company’s
Management Agreement, pursuant to which the Manager provides the Company with managerial, administrative and advisory services, to increase the management fee payable thereunder from $350,000 to $500,000 per annum.
Our Charters
It is our policy to operate our vessels either in the spot market, on time charters or on bareboat charters. Our goal is to take advantage of potentially higher market rates with
spot market related rates and voyage charters. We currently operate all of our 20 vessels in the spot market, although we may consider charters at fixed rates depending on market conditions.
Cooperative Arrangements
We currently operate all of our 20 operating vessels in the spot market through cooperative arrangements with other vessels that are not owned by us.
Since July 1, 2010 and until mid-November 2011, our vessels were employed in a spot market arrangement with Gemini Tankers LLC, of which Frontline Ltd., Teekay Corporation
(NYSE:TK), and we were the main owners of the participating vessels. The cooperative arrangement was managed and operated by Gemini Tankers LLC. Gemini Tankers LLC had the responsibility for the commercial management of the participating vessels,
including marketing, chartering, operating and purchasing bunker (fuel oil) for the vessels. The owners of the participating vessels remained responsible for all other costs including crewing, insurance, repair and maintenance, financing and
technical management of their vessels. The earnings of all of the vessels were aggregated and divided by the actual earning days each vessel was available during the period. The vessels were operated in the spot market under our supervision. The
Company has considered it appropriate to present this type of arrangement on a net basis in the statements of operations.
As from mid-November 2011, our vessels were employed in the spot market cooperation with the Orion Tankers pool, of which Frontline Ltd. and we are the owners of the
participating vessels. This arrangement is managed and operated by Orion Tankers Ltd. Orion Tankers Ltd. is owned equally by us and Frontline Ltd. In mid-November 2011 our vessels were transferred from the Gemini Tankers LLC to the Orion Tankers
pool upon completion of previously fixed charters with Gemini Tankers LLC. The Orion Tankers pool has the responsibility for the commercial management of the participating vessels, including marketing, chartering, operating and purchasing bunker
(fuel oil) for the vessels. The owners of the participating vessels remain responsible for all other costs including crewing, insurance, repair and maintenance, financing and technical management of their vessels. The earnings of all of the vessels
are aggregated and divided by the actual earning days each vessel is available during the period. The vessels are operated in the spot market under our supervision.
Spot Charters
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we temporarily operated four vessels in the spot market, other than through cooperative arrangements. No vessels were
operated in the spot market, other than through cooperative arrangements during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Tankers operating in the spot market are typically chartered for a single voyage which may last up to several weeks. When our
tankers are operating on spot charters outside cooperative arrangements, the vessels are traded fully at the risk and reward of the Company. Tankers operating in the spot market may generate increased profit during a period of strong tanker rates,
while tankers on fixed rate time charters generally provide more predictable cash flows. Under a typical voyage charter in the spot market, we are paid freight on the basis of moving cargo from a loading port to a discharging port. We are
responsible for paying both operating costs and voyage costs and the charterer is responsible for any delay at the loading or discharging ports. The Company considers it appropriate to present this type of arrangement on a gross basis in
the statements of operations.
Bareboat Charters
No vessels have been employed on bareboat charters during 2011.During
the year ended December 31, 2010, two of our vessels were employed on bareboat charters that expired in June 2010 and October 2010, respectively.
Under a bareboat charter, the charterer is responsible for operating and
maintaining the vessel and for paying all operating costs and expenses with respect to the vessel.
Management
Agreement
Scandic American Shipping Ltd is the Manager of
the Company. Under the management agreement (“Management Agreement”), the Manager has the administrative daily commercial and operational responsibility for our vessels and is generally required to manage our day-to-day business
according to our objectives and policies as established and directed by the Board of Directors. All decisions of a material nature concerning our business are made by the Board of Directors. The Management Agreement shall terminate on the date which
is ten years from the calendar date, so that the remaining term of the Management Agreement shall always be ten years unless terminated earlier in accordance with its terms, essentially related to non-performance or negligence by the
Manager.
For its services under the Management Agreement, the Manager is reimbursed for all of its costs incurred plus a management fee of $500,000 per annum for the total fleet. The
management fee was increased from $350,000 per annum for the total fleet, effective July 1, 2010 and to $500,000 per annum, effective December 1, 2011. In order to align the Manager’s interests with those of the Company, the Company has issued
to the Manager restricted common shares equal to 2% of our outstanding common share. When additional common shares are issued, the Manager receives restricted common shares in order to maintain the number of common shares issued to the Manager at 2%
of our total outstanding common shares.
In February 2011, the Company adopted a new equity incentive plan which we refer to as the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan, under which a total of 400,000 restricted shares were
reserved for issuance. As of September 30, 2011, 400,000 restricted shares have been allocated among 23 persons employed in the management of the Company, including the Manager and the members of the Board.
The 2011 Tanker Market (Source: Fearnleys)
Based on data available for the first 11 months of 2011, it was the worst year for the freight market
for all types and sizes of tankers in almost a decade. In 2002, freight rates were periodically lower than in 2011, but the downturn lasted for a shorter period of time, and, more importantly, bunker costs were approximately 75% lower in 2002
compared to 2011. As a result of bunker prices, earnings on a time charter equivalent basis for the largest vessels have been negative for a large part of the year whereas Suezmax earnings have been positive. Normally, time charter equivalents are
calculated on the basis of normal service speed and corresponding bunker consumption, but more recently, due to speed optimization, time charter equivalents for the largest vessels have been above zero as well.
The oil tanker fleet is generally divided into five major categories of vessels, based on carrying
capacity and the types of cargoes carried. A tanker’s carrying capacity is measured in deadweight tons, or dwt, which is the amount of crude oil measured in metric tons that the vessel is capable of loading. In the single voyage
market the Very Large Crude Carrier (“VLCC”), whose carrying capacity ranges from 200,000 dwt to 320,000 dwt, reached an average of about $4,300 per day during the first 11 months of 2011, or more than 80% lower than in 2010. Suezmaxes,
whose carrying capacity ranges from 120,000 dwt to 200,000 dwt, achieved $16,000 per day during the same period, down from $28,500 in the year 2010. Corresponding rates for Aframaxes, whose carrying capacity ranges from 80,000 dwt to 120,000 dwt,
were about $9,900 per day compared with $15,500 per day in the year 2010. Based on data available for the first 11 months of 2011, 2011 has been more challenging for owners than the weak tanker market in the year 2010. The earnings
estimates used in this section are based on service speed and consumption. As most owners nowadays operate their vessels as economically as possible, i.e., by slow steaming, actual earnings are somewhat higher than those above. Earnings have
periodically stayed far below operating costs resulting in substantial operating losses for many companies. Suezmax tankers have generally generated earnings above operating costs. Asset values in 2011 compared to 2010 for Suezmax tankers declined
the least of the three main crude tanker segments.
Preliminary estimates for seaborne crude oil trade, measured in tonne-miles, indicate a decrease of about 2.0% in 2011 compared to 2010. Measured by volume, the decrease is
estimated to be about 2.5%, indicating an increase in average distances. For the first nine months of 2011, crude oil imports to the U.S. show a decrease of about 4.6% compared to the same period in 2010. Transportation work during this period fell
by 5.5% indicating reduced average distances in combination with increased over land imports from Canada. In East Asia, Chinese crude oil imports have stagnated in 2011 whereas Korean crude oil imports have increased and Japanese and Taiwanese
imports are down.
As of the end of November, a total of 58 VLCCs and 41 Suezmax tankers have been delivered from yards. The registered order book indicates that another 16 VLCCs and 15 Suezmaxes
are due for delivery in December 2011. We expect several of these deliveries to be deferred into 2012. The Suezmax fleet is expected to expand by 11.5% and the VLCC fleet by 11.1% (both measured by deadweight) in 2012. In total, net tanker fleet
growth is estimated to be 8.0% in 2012.
The sale and purchase market for tankers, measured by the number of
transactions, is expected to decrease compared with 2010. As of the end of November 2011, about 220 tankers have been sold compared to 269 in 2010. Prices are down across the tanker market and, since the end of 2010, prices have declined
between 9% and 44%.
The International Energy Agency (IEA), according to its November 2011 report, expects global demand for oil to increase by an estimated 1.5% in 2012. With the current financial
turmoil, especially in Europe, and continued challenging times in the U.S. (despite falling unemployment and increased activity in the industry and construction sector) Fearnleys is quite uncertain about market developments for tankers in 2012.
Following a period of rising inflation and numerous actions to restrict credit, the Chinese government has recently eased restrictions somewhat in order to stimulate domestic demand. However, the two main areas of Chinese economic
activity – the real estate sector and exports – are expected to slow down in 2012. Fearnleys does not expect any significant increase in Chinese crude oil imports in 2012.
Result of operations
For the nine months period ended September 30, 2011, our only source of revenue was from the 19 vessels we owned and operated during the period. Of these 19 vessels, 15
vessels operated in the spot market through cooperative arrangements, and four vessels operated temporarily on spot charters outside cooperative arrangements.
We present our statements of operations using voyage revenues and voyage expenses. Under a spot
market-related time charter, the charterer pays substantially all of the vessel voyage costs and the vessel owner pays the operating costs. Under a spot charter, the vessel owner pays all vessel voyage and operating costs. Under a bareboat charter,
the charterer pays substantially all of the vessel voyage and operating costs. Vessel voyage costs consist primarily of fuel, port cost, canal costs and commissions. Operating costs consist primarily of vessel maintenance, crewing, regulatory
compliance and insurance.
Since the
amount of voyage expenses that we incur for a charter depends on the type of charter, we use net voyage revenues to provide comparability among the different types of charters. Net voyage revenue, a non-GAAP financial measure, provides more
meaningful disclosure than voyage revenues, the most directly comparable financial measure under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or U.S. GAAP.
Net voyage revenues divided by the number of days on the charter
provides the Time Charter Equivalent, or TCE, rate. TCE is a measure of the average daily revenue performance of a vessel on a per voyage basis. The Company’s method of calculating TCE is determined by dividing voyage revenues (net of voyage
expenses) by revenue days for the relevant time period. Voyage expenses primarily consist of fuel, port and canal costs that are unique to a particular voyage, which would otherwise be paid by the charterer under a time charter contract, as well as
commissions. TCE revenues, a non-GAAP measure, provides additional meaningful information in conjunction with revenues from our vessels, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, because it assists the Company’s management in making decisions
regarding the deployment and use of our vessels and evaluating their financial performance.
TCE is also a standard shipping industry performance measure used
primarily to compare period-to-period changes in a shipping company’s earnings performance. For bareboat charters, operating costs must be added in order to calculate TCE rates. Net voyage revenues and TCE rates are widely used by investors
and analysts in the tanker shipping industry for comparing the financial performance of companies and for preparing industry averages.
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
All figures in USD ‘000 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited |
|
|
Unaudited |
|
|
Variance |
|
Voyage Revenue
|
|
|
70,158 |
|
|
|
105,951 |
|
|
|
-33.80 |
% |
Voyage Expenses |
|
|
(9,548 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Voyage Revenues |
|
|
60,610 |
|
|
|
105,951 |
|
|
~ (42.8 |
%) |
Vessel Operating
Expenses |
|
|
(39,467 |
) |
|
|
(35,263 |
) |
|
~ 11.9% |
|
General and Administrative
Expenses |
|
|
(10,607 |
) |
|
|
(10,612 |
) |
|
~ 0.0% |
|
Depreciation
Expense |
|
|
(47,587 |
) |
|
|
(46,846 |
) |
|
~ 1.6% |
|
Loss on Contract |
|
|
(16,200 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Operating Income (Loss) |
|
|
(53,251 |
) |
|
|
13,230 |
|
|
|
-502.50 |
% |
Interest Income
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
(1,303 |
) |
|
|
(1,568 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Income (Expense) |
|
|
-92 |
|
|
|
-195 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
(54,645 |
) |
|
|
12,031 |
|
|
~ (554.2 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage Revenue
|
|
|
70,158 |
|
|
|
105,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less Bareboat
Revenue (1) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(6,488 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Less Voyage Expenses |
|
|
(9,548 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Time
Charter Equivalent Revenue |
|
|
60,610 |
|
|
|
99,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel Operating
Days (2) |
|
|
4,565 |
|
|
|
4,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel Revenue
Days (1)(2) |
|
|
4,508 |
|
|
|
4,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-hire Days (2) |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
~ (39.4 |
%) |
Time
Charter Equivalent Rate per day |
|
~$ 13,400 |
|
|
~ $ 25,900 |
|
|
~ (48.2 |
%) |
Vessel Operating Expenses
- Days |
|
|
4,569 |
|
|
|
3,931 |
|
|
~
16.2 |
% |
(1) |
Revenue days for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
consist of 376 days related to the two vessels employed on bareboat charter and 3,931 days related to vessels employed in the spot market. No vessels have been employed on bareboat charters during 2011. |
(2) |
Nordic Harrier (former Gulf Scandic) was redelivered from a bareboat charter in October 2010 and went directly into drydock for repairs. The drydock period was completed in late
April 2011 and the vessel was employed in the spot market pursuant to cooperative arrangements on May 1, 2011. The calendar days in connection with the drydock period are not included in this table. |
Our voyage revenues decreased 33.8% to $70.2 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2011, from $106.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Voyage expenses increased $9.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, from $0.0 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010. The foregoing resulted in net voyage revenues of $60.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to $106.0 million for the nine months ended September 2010, a decrease of 42.8%. The decrease in net
voyage revenues was primarily a result of a decline in spot market rates. The average TCE rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $13,400 per day per vessel, compared to $25,900 per day per vessel for the nine months ended September
30, 2010. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we temporarily operated four vessels in the spot market, so that gross freight to charterers was presented as gross voyage revenues and voyage expenses were presented as gross voyage
expenses. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we operated all our vessels in the spot market through cooperative arrangement, thus the gross freight less voyage expenses were presented net as voyage revenues. The tanker spot
market rates and TCE rates are determined by, among other things, the demand for the carriage of oil and the distance the oil is to be carried, measured in ton miles and the supply of vessels to transport that oil. The increase in voyage expenses is
a result of the gross presentation of the voyage expenses in connection with the four vessels that the Company temporarily operated in the spot market, other than in spot-related time charters through cooperative arrangements.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, total off-hire was 57 days compared to 94 days for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The 57 days off-hire for the
nine months ended September 30, 2011 were a result of a 27 day of planned intermediate survey and of a 30 day unplanned technical off-hire. The 94 days off-hire for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, were a result of 66 days of
planned drydockings and of 28 days unplanned technical off-hire.
Vessel operating expenses were $39.5 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2011, compared to $35.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, an increase of 11.9%. The increase in vessel operating expenses was the result of an increase in operating days by 16.2%. The increase in operating
days is due to the addition of two vessels to our fleet in 2011, one vessel delivered in December 2010 and the redelivery of the two vessels that were on bareboat charters that expired in June 2010 and October 2010, respectively. The increase in
vessel operating expenses due to increase in operating days was offset by a decrease in the average operating expenses to approximately $8,700 per day per vessel for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 from approximately $8,900 per day per
vessel for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The decrease in average operating expenses during 2011 was a result of our continuing high focus on keeping our vessel operating costs low, with particular focus on cost synergies of
operating a homogenous fleet.
General and administrative expenses were $10.6 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2011 and $10.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 include a non-cash charge of $1.0 million of
share-based compensation to 23 persons employed in the management of the Company, members of the Board and to our Manager, Scandic American Shipping Ltd., and a cost of $1.3 million related to the deferred compensation plan for the Company’s
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, include a non-cash charge of $2.8 million for share-based compensation to our Manager, for shares related
to the follow-on offering in January 2010, and a cost of $0.5 million related to the deferred compensation plan for the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Pursuant to our management agreement, our Manager has a right to receive shares to
maintain its ownership of 2% of the Company’s total outstanding shares. In addition, we reimburse our Manager for administrative expenses and pay our Manager an annual fixed fee of $500,000. The management fee was increased from $350,000 per
annum for the total fleet effective July 1, 2010 and to $500,000 per annum effective December 1, 2011.
Depreciation expense was $47.6 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2011 compared to $46.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, resulting an increase of 1.6%. The increase in depreciation expenses is primarily the result of expansion of the fleet by two vessels in 2011 and depreciation
for a whole year for the vessel delivered in December 2010. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we did not impair any of our vessels’ carrying value under our accounting impairment policy, as we believe the future
undiscounted cash flows expected to be earned by such vessels over their operating lives would exceed the vessels’ carrying amounts.
Loss on contract was $16.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Loss on contract is a result of the first partial award received from the arbitration process
which took place in October 2011 and November 2011 and has been recognized as a subsequent event in the interim statement of operations. See note 11 in the notes to the accompanying interim financial statements for further details.
The foregoing resulted in a net operating loss of $53.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to net operating income of $13.2 million for the months
ended September 30, 2010.
Interest income was $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2011 compared to $0.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The decrease in interest income is a result of the Company holding no excess cash in the period, combined with a decrease in interest rates.
Interest expense was $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to $1.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The decrease in interest
expense related primarily to our having capitalized interest expense on newbuildings of $0.5 million, compared to $0.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Our Credit Facility
The Company has a $500 million revolving credit facility, which is referred to as the Credit Facility. The Company entered into the Credit Facility in September 2005. During 2006
the Company increased the Credit Facility from $300 million to $500 million, and in March 2008 the term was extended from September 2010 to September 2013. All other terms remained unchanged.
The Credit Facility provides funding for future vessel acquisitions and general corporate purposes. The Credit Facility cannot be reduced by the lenders and there is no repayment
obligation of the principal during the five year term. Amounts borrowed under the Credit Facility bear interest at an annual rate equal to LIBOR plus a margin between 0.7% and 1.2% (depending on the loan to vessel value ratio). The Company pays a
commitment fee of 30% of the applicable margin on any undrawn amounts.
The undrawn amount of this facility as of September 30, 2011 was $330.0
million. The Company is currently in compliance with its loan covenants.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
Cash flows provided by operating activities
decreased by 100.9% to ($0.5) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 from $55.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The decrease in cash flows provided by operating activities is primarily due to lower spot market
rates and an increase of vessel operating expenses due to expansion of the fleet in December 2010 and during 2011, as described above.
Cash flows used in investing activities decreased to $61.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, from $149.9 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010. The investing activities consist primarily of payments made in connection with the drydocking of Nordic Harrier and in connection with the delivery of Nordic Breeze and Nordic Aurora.
Cash flows provided by financing activities decreased to $54.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to $118.5 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010. The financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 represent net proceeds from use of the Credit Facility of $95.0 million less dividends paid of $40.1 million. The financing activities for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 represent proceeds from the follow-on offerings of $136.5 million, net proceeds from use of the Credit Facility of $50.0 million
less dividends paid of $68.0 million.
During the year 2012, eight of the Company’s vessels are required
to be drydocked for overhaul repair and maintenance that cannot be performed while the vessels are in operation. The total off-hire days are estimated at 160 days and drydocking costs are estimated at $16.0 million. These drydocking costs
are to be financed through the capital resources of the Company.
Management believes that the Company’s working capital is
sufficient for its present requirements.
Contractual
Obligations
The Company’s significant contractual
obligations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, consist of our obligations as borrower under our Credit Facility, our obligations under a newbuilding contract, the Management Agreement with Scandic American Shipping Ltd., and our deferred
compensation agreement for our Chief Financial Officer and our Chairman, President and CEO.
The following table sets out long-term financial, commercial and other obligations outstanding as of September 30, 2011 (all figures in thousands of USD).
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total |
|
|
Less than 1 year |
|
|
1-3 years |
|
|
3-5 years |
|
|
More than 5 years |
|
Credit Facility
(1) |
|
|
170,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
170,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Interest Payments
(2) |
|
|
9,331 |
|
|
|
3,457 |
|
|
|
5,874 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Commitment Fees
(3) |
|
|
1,692 |
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
987 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Management Fees
(4) |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
Deferred Compensation
Agreement (5) |
|
|
9,398 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
9,398 |
|
Newbulding Nordic Zenith (6) |
|
|
29,100 |
|
|
|
29,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
224,521 |
|
|
|
33,762 |
|
|
|
177,861 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
11,898 |
|
Notes:
(1)
|
Refers to our obligation to repay
indebtedness outstanding as of September 30, 2011. |
(2) |
Refers to estimated interest payments over the term of the indebtedness outstanding as of September 30, 2011. |
(3) |
Refers to estimated commitment fees over the term of the indebtedness outstanding as of September 30, 2011. |
(4) |
Refers to the management fees payable to Scandic American Shipping Ltd. under the Management Agreement as of September 30, 2011. |
(5) |
Refers to our estimated deferred compensation agreement payable to the Company’s CEO and CFO as of September 30, 2011. |
(6) |
Refers to our payment obligation as of September 30, 2011 for the newbuilding, Nordic Zenith, delivered to us in November 2011. |
Employment Agreement
We have employment agreements with Herbjørn Hansson, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Turid M. Sørensen, our Chief Financial Officer, Rolf I.
Amundsen, our Chief Investor Relations Officer and Advisor to the Chairman and Jan Erik Langangen, our Executive Vice President, Business Development & Legal. Mr. Hansson does not receive any additional compensation for his services as a
director or the Chairman of the Board. The aggregate compensation of our executive officers during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was approximately $2.1 million. Under certain circumstances, the employment agreement may be terminated by us
or Mr. Hansson upon six months’ written notice to the other party. The employment agreement with Ms. Sørensen may be terminated by us or by Ms. Sørensen upon six months’ written notice to the other party. The employment
agreements with Mr. Amundsen and Mr. Langangen may be terminated by us or Mr. Amundsen or Mr Langangen upon three months’ written notice to the other party.
In 2011 the Board of
Directors established a new incentive plan involving a maximum of 400,000 restricted shares of which all 400,000 shares have been allocated among 23 persons employed in the management of the Company, the Manager and the members of the Board. The
aggregate number of restricted shares issued to our executive officers during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was 110,000. The aggregate number of restricted shares to our Directors during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was
53,000.The vesting period is a 4 year cliff vesting period for 326,000 shares and a 5 year cliff vesting period for 74,000 shares, that is, none of these shares may be sold during the first four or five years after grant, as applicable, and the
shares are forfeited if the grantee leaves the Company before that time. The holders of the restricted shares are entitled to receive dividends paid in the period as well as voting rights. The Board considers this arrangement to be in the best
interests of the Company.
Our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer have individual deferred compensation agreements. The Chief Executive Officer has served in his present position since the inception of the Company in 1995. Please see Note 7 to the audited financial statements included herein for
further information about the agreements.
Statements of Operations for the nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 |
All figures in USD ‘000, except share and per
share amount |
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
Notes |
|
|
2011 Unaudited |
|
|
2010 Unaudited |
|
Voyage Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
70,158 |
|
|
|
105,951 |
|
Voyage Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
(9,548 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Vessel Operating Expense -
excluding depreciation expense presented below |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,467 |
) |
|
|
(35,263 |
) |
General and Administrative
Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,607 |
) |
|
|
(10,612 |
) |
Depreciation
Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,587 |
) |
|
|
(46,846 |
) |
Loss on Contract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,200 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Net Operating Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,251 |
) |
|
|
13,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,303 |
) |
|
|
(1,568 |
) |
Other Financial Income (Expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
(195 |
) |
Total Other Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,394 |
) |
|
|
(1,199 |
) |
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54,645 |
) |
|
|
12,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings (Loss) per
Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.16 |
) |
|
|
0.26 |
|
Diluted Earnings (Loss) per
Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.16 |
) |
|
|
0.26 |
|
Basic Weighted Average Number
of Common Shares Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,111,266 |
|
|
|
46,434,552 |
|
Diluted Weighted Average
Number of Common Shares Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,111,266 |
|
|
|
46,434,552 |
|
The
footnotes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2011 AND DECEMBER 31, 2010
|
All
figures in USD ‘000, except share and per share amount |
|
|
|
|
Notes |
|
|
September 30, 2011 Unaudited |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,404 |
|
|
|
17,221 |
|
Accounts Receivable, net $0
allowance at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,332 |
|
|
|
11,046 |
|
Marketable
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,506 |
|
|
|
43,376 |
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,792 |
|
|
|
71,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,008,101 |
|
|
|
988,263 |
|
Other Non-current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
23,177 |
|
Total Non-current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,008,754 |
|
|
|
1,011,440 |
|
Total Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,111,546 |
|
|
|
1,083,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,886 |
|
|
|
2,934 |
|
Accrued Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,301 |
|
|
|
4,060 |
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,187 |
|
|
|
6,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
Deferred Compensation Liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,398 |
|
|
|
8,134 |
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
212,585 |
|
|
|
90,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’ Equity
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per Share; 90,000,000 shares authorized ,
47,298,782 shares issued and outstanding and 51,200,000 shares authorized, 46,898,782 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
Additional Paid-in
Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
953,378 |
|
|
|
993,295 |
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Retained Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54,645 |
) |
|
|
(809 |
) |
Total Shareholders’ Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
898,961 |
|
|
|
992,955 |
|
Total
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,111,546 |
|
|
|
1,083,083 |
|
The footnotes are an integral part of these financial
statements
Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011, AND
2010 |
All figures in USD ‘000 |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 Unaudited |
|
|
2010 Unaudited |
|
Cash Flows from
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
(Loss) |
|
|
(54,645 |
) |
|
|
12,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of Net Income to Net Cash Provided by
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
Expense |
|
|
47,587 |
|
|
|
46,846 |
|
Loss on Contract
|
|
|
16,200 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Dry-dock
Expenditures |
|
|
(10,787 |
) |
|
|
(5,312 |
) |
Amortization of Deferred
Finance Costs |
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
Deferred Compensation
Liability |
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
Compensation –
Restricted Shares |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,837 |
|
Share-based
Compensation |
|
|
974 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes
in Operating Assets and Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
Receivables |
|
|
(3,286 |
) |
|
|
5,115 |
|
Accounts Payable and Accrued
Liabilities |
|
|
10,089 |
|
|
|
(1,408 |
) |
Prepaid and Other Current
Assets |
|
|
(5,373 |
) |
|
|
736 |
|
Voyages in
Progress |
|
|
(2,976 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Other Non-current Assets |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(6,884 |
) |
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Operating Activities |
|
|
(465 |
) |
|
|
55,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows
from Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in Marketable
Securities |
|
|
(795 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Investment in
Vessels |
|
|
(60,475 |
) |
|
|
(141,558 |
) |
Loan to Seller, Nordic Galaxy |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(8,384 |
) |
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
|
|
(61,270 |
) |
|
|
(149,942 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows
from Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Issuance of
Common Stock |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
136,511 |
|
Proceeds from Use of Credit
Facility |
|
|
95,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
Repayments on Credit
Facility |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(150,000 |
) |
Dividends Paid |
|
|
(40,082 |
) |
|
|
(68,003 |
) |
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities |
|
|
54,918 |
|
|
|
118,508 |
|
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(6,817 |
) |
|
|
23,591 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at the Beginning of Year |
|
|
17,221 |
|
|
|
30,496 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at the End of Year |
|
|
10,404 |
|
|
|
54,087 |
|
Cash Paid for
Interest |
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
1,174 |
|
Cash Paid for
Taxes |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
The footnotes are an integral part of these financial
statements
Statements of Changes in Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, and for the year ended December 31, 2010
|
All figures in USD ‘000, except number of
shares |
|
|
September
30, 2011
Unaudited |
|
|
December
31, 2010 |
|
Number of Shares
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of
year |
|
|
46,898,782 |
|
|
|
42,204,904 |
|
Common Shares Issued, net of
$3.5 million issuance costs |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,600,000 |
|
Compensation - Restricted
Shares |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
93,878 |
|
Share-based Compensation |
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Balance at end of the period |
|
|
47,298,782 |
|
|
|
46,898,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of
year |
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
Common Shares Issued, net of
$3.5 million issuance costs |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
46 |
|
Compensation - Restricted
Shares |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Share-based Compensation |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
Paid-in Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of
year |
|
|
11,480 |
|
|
|
8,533 |
|
Common Shares Issued, net of
$3.5 million issuance costs |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Compensation –
Restricted Shares |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,837 |
|
Share-based Compensation |
|
|
974 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
12,454 |
|
|
|
11,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributed Surplus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of
year |
|
|
981,815 |
|
|
|
925,129 |
|
Accumulated coverage of loss
of 2010 |
|
|
(809 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Common Shares Issued, net of
$3.5 million issuance costs |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
136,414 |
|
Return of Capital, $1.7 and 0.85 per share at December 31, 2010 and
September 30, 2011 respectively |
|
|
(40,082 |
) |
|
|
(79,728 |
) |
Balance at end of period |
|
|
940,924 |
|
|
|
981,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other Comprehensive Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of
year |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income |
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of
year |
|
|
(809 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Accumulated Coverage of Loss
of 2010 |
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
(54,645 |
) |
|
|
(809 |
) |
Balance at end of period |
|
|
(54,645 |
) |
|
|
(809 |
) |
Total
Equity |
|
|
898,961 |
|
|
|
992,955 |
|
The footnotes are an integral part of these financial
statements
NORDIC AMERICAN TANKERS LIMITED
Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements
1. INTERIM FINANCIAL DATA
The unaudited condensed interim financial statements for Nordic
American Tankers Limited (the “Company”) have been prepared on the same basis as the Company’s audited financial statements and, in the opinion of management, include all material adjustments, consisting of normal recurring
adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The accompanying unaudited
condensed interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual financial statements and notes included in the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the Company’s significant accounting policies is identified in Note 1 of the Company’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010
included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F. There have been no changes to the Company’s significant accounting policies other than noted below.
New Accounting Policies:
The Company’s investments in marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale securities and are carried at fair value. Net unrealized gains and losses on
available-for-sale securities are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Realized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are computed based upon the historical cost of these securities applied using the
weighted-average historical cost method.
The Company analyzes its
available-for-sale securities for impairment during each reporting period to evaluate whether an event or change in circumstances has occurred in that period that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment. The Company
records an impairment charge through current-period earnings and adjusts the cost basis for such other-than-temporary declines in fair value when the fair value is not anticipated to recover above cost within a three-month period after the
measurement date, unless there are mitigating factors that indicate an impairment charge through earnings may not be required. If an impairment charge is recorded, subsequent recoveries in fair value are not reflected in earnings until sale of the
security.
3. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In June 2004, the Company entered into a Management Agreement with
Scandic American Shipping Ltd. (“Scandic” or the “Manager”). The Manager is owned by a company controlled by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Mr. Herbjørn Hansson and his family. In order to
align the Manager’s interests with those of the Company, the Company has issued to the Manager restricted common shares equal to 2% of our outstanding common shares. Any time additional common shares are issued, the Manager will receive
restricted common shares to maintain the number of common shares issued to the Manager at 2% of our total outstanding common shares.
The Manager has administrative, commercial and operational responsibility for the Company’s vessels and is required to manage the Company’s day-to-day business
subject to the Company’s objectives and policies as established by the Board of Directors. For its services under the Management Agreement, the Manager is entitled to reimbursement of costs directly related to the Company plus a management fee
equal to $500,000 per annum, increased from $350,000 to $500,000, effective December 1, 2011.
The Company recognized $5.0 million and $5.0 million of total costs for
services provided under the Management Agreement for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, and 2010, respectively. Additionally, the Company recognized $0.0 million and $2.8 million in non-cash share-based compensation expense for the nine
months ended September 30, 2011, and September 30, 2010, respectively, related to the issuance of shares to the Manager. All of these costs are included in “General and Administrative Expenses” in the statement of operations. The related
party balances included within “Accounts Payable” were $0.5 million and $0.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, and September 30, 2010, respectively.
As of September 30, 2011, the Manager owned, together with its owners, 2.15% of the Company’s shares. The Management Agreement terminates on the date which
is ten years from the calendar date, so that the remaining term of the Management Agreement is always ten years unless terminated earlier in accordance with its terms, essentially related to non-performance or negligence by the Manager.
In February 2011, the Company adopted a new equity incentive plan which we refer to as the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan, pursuant to which a total of 400,000 restricted shares were
reserved for issuance. All of 400, 000 restricted shares were allocated among 23 persons employed in the management of the Company, including the Manager and the members of the Board.
Mr. Jan Erik Langangen, Board Member and an employee of the Company, is a partner of Langangen & Helset Advokatfirma AS, a firm which provides legal services to the
Company. The Company recognized $66,647 and $46,413 in costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, and September 30, 2010, respectively, for the services provided by Langangen & Helset Advokatfirma AS. These costs are included
in “General and Administrative Expenses” in the statement of operations. Balances in reference to this related party included within “Accounts Payable” were $0 and $0 at September 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively.
Mr. Rolf Amundsen, the Company’s Investor Relations Manager, is a partner of Amundsen & Partners AS, a firm which provides consultancy services to the
Company. The Company recognized $54,015 and $39,864 in costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 respectively, for the services provided by Amundsen & Partners AS. These costs are included in
“General and Administrative Expenses” within the statement of operations. Balances in reference to this related party included in “Accounts Payable” were $8,944 and $15,593 at September 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively.
4. LONG-TERM DEBT
The Company has a $500 million revolving credit facility (the
“Credit Facility”), with a maturity in September, 2013.
The Credit Facility provides funding for future vessel acquisitions and
general corporate purposes. The Credit Facility cannot be reduced by the lender and there is no repayment obligation of the principal during the term of the facility. Amounts borrowed under the Credit Facility bear interest at an annual rate equal
to LIBOR plus a margin between 0.70% and 1.20% (depending on the loan to vessel value ratio). The Company pays a commitment fee of 30% of the applicable margin on any undrawn amounts. Total commitment fees paid for the nine months ended September
30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 were $0.6 million and $0.7 million, respectively. The undrawn amount of this facility as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $330.0 million and $425.0 million, respectively.
Borrowings under the Credit Facility are secured by first priority mortgages over the Company’s vessels and assignments of earnings and insurance. Under the terms and
conditions of the Credit Facility the Company is, among other things, required to maintain certain loan to vessel value ratios, to maintain a book equity of no less than $150.0 million, to remain listed on a recognized stock exchange, and to obtain
the consent of the lenders prior to creating liens on or disposing of the Company’s vessels. The Company is permitted to pay dividends in accordance with its dividend policy as long as it is not in default under the Credit
Facility.
The Company was in compliance with its loan covenants for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
5. SHARE CAPITAL
Included in Additional Paid in Capital is the Company’s Share
Premium Fund as defined by Bermuda Law. The Share Premium Fund cannot be distributed without complying with certain legal procedures designed to protect the creditors of the Company. The Share Premium Fund was $0 million and $0 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
As of September 30, 2011, 47,298,782 shares were issued and outstanding, which included 573,694
restricted shares issued to the Manager and 226,000 restricted shares issued to employees, Directors and non-employees. Par value of the Company’s common shares is $0.01.
On June 1, 2011, at its Annual General Meeting (“AGM”) held
in Bermuda, the Company increased authorized share capital from 51,200,000 common shares to 90,000,000 common shares, par value $0.01 per share.
In connection with the issuance of 400,000 shares related to the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan, the Manager was entitled to 4,612 restricted shares in the Company. The 4,612
restricted shares were issued to the Manager on October 24, 2011.
6. VESSELS
As of September 30, 2011, Vessels, Net consisted of 19 Suezmax crude oil tankers, one newbuilding and capitalized drydocking charges. Depreciation is calculated based on cost
less estimated residual value of $4.0 million and is provided over the estimated useful life of the vessel using the straight-line method. The estimated useful life of a vessel is 25 years from the date the vessel is delivered from the shipyard.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we did not impair any of our vessels’ carrying value under our accounting impairment policy, as we believe the future undiscounted cash flows expected to be earned by such vessels over
their operating lives would exceed the vessels’ carrying amounts.
In April 2010, the Company entered into agreements with Samsung Heavy
Industries Co. Ltd, to acquire two Suezmax newbuildings and the first vessel, the Nordic Breeze was delivered to the Company in August 2011 and the Nordic Zenith was delivered to the Company in November 2011. The Company took ownership of the
vessels upon delivery from the shipyard at which time the title was transferred from the seller. The agreed total prices at delivery were $64.7 million and $64.7 million, respectively with 55% of the purchase prices paid when we signed the contracts
and the balance paid on delivery. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had paid $100.4 million to the seller. The remaining $29.1 million was paid to Samsung Heavy Industries upon delivery in November 2011.
7. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
Management Agreement
In order to further align the Manager’s interests the Company agreed to issue to the Manager restricted common shares equal to 2% of its outstanding common shares at par
value of $0.01 per share. Any time additional common shares are issued, the Manager is entitled to receive additional restricted common shares to maintain the number of common shares issued to the Manager at 2% of total outstanding common shares.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company did not issue any restricted shares to the Manager. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company issued to the Manager 93,878 restricted shares at an average fair
value of $30.24. These restricted shares are non-transferable for three years from issuance. In connection with the issuance of 400,000 shares related to the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan, on October 24, 2011, 4,612 restricted shares were issued to the
Manager.
2004 Stock Incentive
Plan
As of December 31, 2010 the Company had a share-based
compensation plan that had been active since 2004. The plan was cancelled in 2011. Total compensation cost related to the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan was $0.06 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, and was recorded within “General and
Administrative expense” in the Statement of Operations. All the restricted shares to employees and non-employees had vested by the end of 2010.
Equity Incentive Plan 2011
In 2011 the Board of Directors decided to establish a new incentive plan
involving a maximum of 400,000 restricted shares of which all 400,000 shares have been allocated among 23 persons employed in the management of the Company, the Manager and the members of the Board. These allocated shares constitute 0.8% of the
outstanding shares of the Company. The vesting period is 4 year cliff vesting period for 326,000 shares and 5 year cliff vesting period for 74,000 shares, that is, none of these shares may be sold during the first four or five years after grant, as
applicable, and the shares are forfeited if the grantee leaves the Company before that time. The holders of the restricted shares are entitled to receive dividends paid in the period as well as voting rights. The Board considers this arrangement to
be in the best interests of the Company.
Restricted Shares to Employees and Directors and to Non-Employees
Under the terms of the Plan 400,000 shares of restricted stock awards
were granted to certain employees and Directors and to non-employees during 2011. Of these shares, 326,000 restricted shares were granted on February 23, 2011, at a grant date fair value of $23.88 per share, and 74,000 restricted shares were granted
on August 5, 2011, at a grant date fair value of $18.05 per share.
The fair value of restricted shares is estimated based on the market
price of the Company’s shares. The fair value of restricted shares granted to employees is measured at grant date and the fair value of unvested restricted shares granted to non-employees is measured at fair value at each reporting
date.
The shares are considered restricted as the shares vest after a period of four years and five years. The holders of the restricted shares are entitled to receive dividends paid
in the period as well as voting rights.
The total of 326,000 restricted shares will be fully vested in March
2015, and 74,000 restricted shares will be fully vested in August 2016.
The compensation cost for employees, Directors and non-employees is
recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period and is presented as part of the general and administrative expenses. The total compensation cost related to restricted shares under the plan for the nine months ending September 30, 2011
was $1.0 million. The intrinsic value of restricted shares outstanding at September 30, 2011 was $5.8 million.
At September 30, 2011, there were 400,000 restricted shares outstanding
at a weighted-average grant date fair value of $23.88 for employees and Directors and of $22.06 for non-employees. As of September 30, 2011, unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted shares aggregated $7.3 million, which will be
recognized over a weighted period of 3.67 years.
The tables below summarize the Company’s restricted stock awards
as of September 30, 2011:
|
|
Restricted shares -Employees |
|
|
Weighted- average grant- date fair value - Employees |
|
|
Restricted shares - Non- employees |
|
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair value - Non-employees |
|
Non-vested at January 1,
2011 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Granted during the
year |
|
|
163,000 |
|
|
$ |
23.88 |
|
|
|
237,000 |
|
|
$ |
22.06 |
|
Vested during the
year |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Forfeited during the
year |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Non-vested at September 30, 2011 |
|
|
163,000 |
|
|
$ |
23.88 |
|
|
|
237,000 |
|
|
$ |
22.06 |
|
The tables below summarize the Company’s restricted stock awards as of December 31, 2010:
|
|
Restricted shares - Employees |
|
|
Weighted- average grant- date fair value - Employees |
|
|
Restricted shares - Non- employees |
|
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair value - Non-employees |
|
Non-vested at January 1,
2010 |
|
|
2,425 |
|
|
$ |
31.99 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
$ |
31.99 |
|
Granted during the
year |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Vested during the
year |
|
|
2,425 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Forfeited during the
year |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
8. MARKETABLE SECURITIES
Marketable securities held by the Company are equity securities considered to be available-for-sale securities.
All figures in USD '000 |
|
September 30, 2011 Unaudited |
|
|
December 31, 2010 Audited |
|
Cost |
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Accumulated net unrealized loss |
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Fair value |
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
- |
|
At September
30, 2011, net unrealized loss on marketable securities included in comprehensive income is $0.2 million. The Company has not recognized any sale of marketable securities in the period.
9. EARNING PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) are computed by dividing
net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common stock equivalents (i.e., stock options,
warrants) outstanding during the period.
For the nine months ending September 30, 2011, the Company had a net
loss, thus any effect of common stock equivalents outstanding would be antidilutive. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company had 16,700 restricted shares outstanding, which were included in the total common shares issued and
outstanding as at September 30, 2010.
10. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company did not hold any derivative instruments for the nine months
ended September 30, 2011 or 2010.
The majority of the Company’s transactions, assets and liabilities
are denominated in United States dollars, the functional currency of the Company. There is no significant risk that currency fluctuations will have a negative effect of the value of the Company’s cash flows.
The carrying value of estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments at September 30, 2011, and 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
All figures in USD ‘000 |
|
Fair Value Hierarchy Level (1) |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
Cash and Cash
Equivalent |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
10,404 |
|
|
|
10,404 |
|
|
|
17,221 |
|
|
|
17,221 |
|
Marketable
Securities |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Loan to First Olsen Ltd
– refer to Note 11 |
|
|
|
|
26,809 |
|
|
|
26,809 |
|
|
|
26,809 |
|
|
|
26,809 |
|
Working capital, cooperative
arrangements |
|
|
|
|
28,600 |
|
|
|
28,600 |
|
|
|
22,034 |
|
|
|
22,034 |
|
Credit Facility
|
|
|
|
|
170,000 |
|
|
|
170,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
(1) |
The fair value hierarchy level is only applicable to each
financial instrument on the balance sheet that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis |
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents is reasonable estimate of fair value. The estimated fair value for the long term debt is considered to be equal to the carrying
values since it bears variable interest rates.
11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Nordic Galaxy
In August 2010, we did not take delivery of the first of the two
newbuilding vessels we agreed to acquire on November 5, 2007, because the vessel in our judgment was not in a deliverable condition as under the Memorandum of Agreement between the Company and the Seller. The Seller, a subsidiary of First Olsen Ltd,
did not agree with the Company and the parties commenced arbitration procedures which took place in London in October and November 2011. The agreed total price at scheduled delivery was $90.0 million per vessel, including supervision expenses. The
Company furnished to the Seller a loan equivalent to the payment installments under the shipbuilding contract. The loan from the Company to the Seller accrued interest at a rate equal to the Company’s cost of funds, and the loan was to be
repaid on delivery of the vessel.
According to the first partial award received on November 18, 2011, the
vessel was found to be in a deliverable condition in August 2010. The Seller originally claimed $26.8 million in compensation however the first partial award was limited to $16.2 million. The compensation of $16.2 million has been
recognized as a subsequent event in our interim statement of operations and is included in the Accrued Liabilities for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The recorded loss on contract will not have an impact on the Company’s net cash
flow for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
As a consequence of the first partial award, the Seller has to repay to
us the outstanding loan balance as of November 18, 2011of $19.3 million. As of the date of this report, the Seller has paid to us the total outstanding balance and the Company has also settled the compensation to the Seller. In November 2011, the
Seller paid $1.2 million in interest income to us in connection with the outstanding balance of the loan. The interest on the outstanding amount has not been recognized in the profit and loss account for the nine months ended September 30,
2011.
On January 17, 2012, we received the final award from the tribunal and as a consequence we shall be responsible for some of the legal costs of the Seller. We expect that the
amount of legal fees of the Seller will be approximately $1.2 million.
As at September 30, 2011, we have included in Prepaid Expenses and Other
Current Assets the outstanding loan to the Seller of $26.8 million, and $9.0 million as deposit on contract. The deposit on contract is to be paid to the Company when the arbitration procedures are finalized. For the nine months ended September 30,
2011, we have recognized $0.8 million in legal fees. We have recognized $0.7 million in legal fees during October and November 2011.
Newbuilding Nordic
Zenith
As at September 30, 2011, the Company was committed to the newbuilding contract of Nordic Zenith that
we agreed to acquire in April, 2010, for a total cost of $64.7 million, excluding capitalized interest and pre-delivery expenses. As at September 30, 2011, the remaining payment required to be made under this newbuilding contract was $29.1
million.
Nordic Harrier
In October 2010, Nordic Harrier was redelivered, from a long-term
bareboat charter agreement, to the Company and went directly into drydock. The drydock period lasted until the end of April 2011. The vessel had not been technically operated according to sound maintenance practices by Gulf Navigation Company LLC,
and the vessel’s condition on redelivery to us was far below the contractual obligation of the charterer. All drydock expenses are capitalized and paid as of September 30, 2011. We have sought compensation for these expenses, but
have not been able to reach an agreement with Gulf Navigation Company LLC. The arbitration procedures have started and are expected to be finalized in 2012.
Legal Proceedings and Claims
The Company may become a party to various legal proceedings generally
incidental to its business and is subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations. As is the case with other companies in similar industries, the Company faces exposure from actual or potential claims and legal
proceedings. Although the ultimate disposition of legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, it is the opinion of the Company’s management that the outcome of any claim which might be pending or threatened, either individually or on
a combined basis, will not have a materially adverse effect on the financial position of the Company, but could materially affect the Company’s results of operations in a given year.
No claims have been filed against the Company for the fiscal year 2011 or 2010, and the Company has not been a party to any legal proceedings for the nine months ended September
30, 2011 and September 30, 2010, except for information set forth above.
12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On November 18, 2011, the Company received the first partial award and
on January 17, 2012, the Company received the final award related to the first of the two newbuilding vessels we agreed to acquire on November 5, 2007. See note 11 for further details.
In November 2011, the Company took delivery of the second of the two newbuilding vessels from Samsung Heavy Industries Co. Ltd, Nordic Zenith, that we agreed to acquire in April,
2010. The vessel was financed from the resources of the Company and the remaining $29.1 million was paid to Samsung Heavy Industries upon delivery in November 2011.
In November 2011, the Company’s board of directors declared a dividend of $0.30 per share in respect of the third quarter of 2011. The dividend was paid on December 2, 2011
to shareholders of record as of November 23, 2011.
In November 2011, the Company together with Frontline Ltd. established
Orion Tankers LLC, which is owned equally by us and Frontline. The related Orion Tankers pool commenced operating from November 24, 2011. Subsequent to that specific date, each of our vessels exited the Gemini Tanker LLC arrangement and entered
directly into cooperative arrangement with the Orion Tankers pool upon completion of previously fixed charters arranged by Gemini Tankers LLC.
* * * *
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Matters discussed in this report may constitute forward-looking statements. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides safe harbor protections for
forward-looking statements in order to encourage companies to provide prospective information about their business. Forward-lo99oking statements include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance, and
underlying assumptions and other statements, which are other than statements of historical facts.
The Company desires to take advantage of the safe harbor provisions of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and is including this cautionary statement in connection with this safe harbor legislation. The words “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,”
“forecast,” “project,” “plan,” “potential,” “may,” “should,” “expect,” “pending” and similar expressions identify forward-looking
statements.
The forward-looking statements in this report are based upon various assumptions, many of which are based, in turn, upon further assumptions, including without limitation, our
management’s examination of historical operating trends, data contained in our records and other data available from third parties. Although we believe that these assumptions were reasonable when made, because these assumptions are inherently
subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies which are difficult or impossible to predict and are beyond our control, we cannot assure you that we will achieve or accomplish these expectations, beliefs or projections. We undertake no
obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Important factors that, in our view, could cause actual results to
differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements include the strength of world economies and currencies, general market conditions, including fluctuations in charter rates and vessel values, changes in demand in the tanker
market, as a result of changes in OPEC’s petroleum production levels and world wide oil consumption and storage, changes in our operating expenses, including bunker prices, drydocking and insurance costs, the market for our vessels,
availability of financing and refinancing, changes in governmental rules and regulations or actions taken by regulatory authorities, potential liability from pending or future litigation, general domestic and international political conditions,
potential disruption of shipping routes due to piracy, accidents or political events, vessels breakdowns and instances of off-hire, failure on the part of a seller to complete a sale to us and other important factors described from time to time in
the reports filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the prospectus and related prospectus supplement, our Annual Report on Form 20-F, and our Reports on Form 6-K.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
|
NORDIC AMERICAN TANKERS LIMITED |
|
(registrant) |
|
|
|
Dated: January 18, 2012 |
By:
|
/
S/ HERBJØRN HANSSON |
|
|
Herbjørn
Hansson |
|
|
Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer and President |
|
|
|