UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended: March 31, 2012
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-11852
HEALTHCARE REALTY TRUST INCORPORATED
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland | 62 1507028 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
3310 West End Avenue
Suite 700
Nashville, Tennessee 37203
(Address of principal executive offices)
(615) 269-8175
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | x | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
As of April 25, 2012, 77,961,903 shares of the Registrants Common Stock were outstanding.
HEALTHCARE REALTY TRUST INCORPORATED
FORM 10-Q
March 31, 2012
Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Real estate properties: |
||||||||
Land |
$ | 166,464 | $ | 162,843 | ||||
Buildings, improvements and lease intangibles |
2,571,774 | 2,521,226 | ||||||
Personal property |
18,495 | 18,221 | ||||||
Construction in progress |
36,035 | 86,328 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
2,792,768 | 2,788,618 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(540,361 | ) | (516,747 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total real estate properties, net |
2,252,407 | 2,271,871 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
6,610 | 4,738 | ||||||
Mortgage notes receivable |
112,767 | 97,381 | ||||||
Assets held for sale and discontinued operations, net |
13,762 | 28,650 | ||||||
Other assets, net |
118,108 | 118,382 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
$ | 2,503,654 | $ | 2,521,022 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||
Notes and bonds payable |
$ | 1,418,571 | $ | 1,393,537 | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
47,036 | 72,217 | ||||||
Liabilities of discontinued operations |
154 | 518 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
52,166 | 49,944 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
1,517,927 | 1,516,216 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 77,961,692 and 77,843,883 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively |
780 | 779 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
1,895,777 | 1,894,604 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(3,332 | ) | (3,332 | ) | ||||
Cumulative net income attributable to common stockholders |
799,085 | 795,951 | ||||||
Cumulative dividends |
(1,706,583 | ) | (1,683,196 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total stockholders equity |
985,727 | 1,004,806 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 2,503,654 | $ | 2,521,022 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes, together with the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, are an integral part of these financial statements.
1
Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
REVENUES |
||||||||
Property operating |
$ | 59,456 | $ | 52,285 | ||||
Single-tenant net lease |
12,669 | 14,440 | ||||||
Straight-line rent |
1,900 | 1,328 | ||||||
Mortgage interest |
2,292 | 1,649 | ||||||
Other operating |
1,774 | 2,302 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
78,091 | 72,004 | |||||||
EXPENSES |
||||||||
Property operating |
28,965 | 27,840 | ||||||
General and administrative |
5,265 | 5,781 | ||||||
Depreciation |
21,388 | 18,631 | ||||||
Amortization |
2,537 | 1,778 | ||||||
Bad debt, net |
(41 | ) | 180 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
58,114 | 54,210 | |||||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) |
||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| (1,986 | ) | |||||
Interest expense |
(18,379 | ) | (22,274 | ) | ||||
Interest and other income, net |
305 | 223 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
(18,074 | ) | (24,037 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
1,903 | (6,243 | ) | |||||
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
1,973 | 592 | ||||||
Impairments |
(4,170 | ) | (147 | ) | ||||
Gain on sales of real estate properties |
3,428 | 36 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
1,231 | 481 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
3,134 | (5,762 | ) | |||||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| (27 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS |
$ | 3,134 | $ | (5,789 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|||||
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE: |
||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
$ | 0.02 | $ | (0.09 | ) | |||
Discontinued operations |
0.02 | 0.00 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders |
$ | 0.04 | $ | (0.09 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|||||
DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE: |
||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
$ | 0.02 | $ | (0.09 | ) | |||
Discontinued operations |
0.02 | 0.00 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders |
$ | 0.04 | $ | (0.09 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDINGBASIC |
76,426,709 | 66,151,426 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDINGDILUTED |
77,641,042 | 66,151,426 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
DIVIDENDS DECLARED, PER COMMON SHARE, DURING THE PERIOD |
$ | 0.30 | $ | 0.30 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes, together with the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, are an integral part of these financial statements.
2
Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) |
$ | 3,134 | $ | (5,762 | ) | |||
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| (27 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS |
$ | 3,134 | $ | (5,789 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes, together with the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 3,134 | $ | (5,762 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
24,732 | 21,855 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
932 | 941 | ||||||
Straight-line rent receivable |
(1,900 | ) | (1,286 | ) | ||||
Straight-line rent liability |
90 | 97 | ||||||
Gain on sales of real estate properties |
(3,428 | ) | (36 | ) | ||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| 1,986 | ||||||
Impairments |
4,170 | 147 | ||||||
Provision for bad debt, net |
(42 | ) | 195 | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Other assets |
1,290 | (3,721 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
(20,628 | ) | (6,418 | ) | ||||
Other liabilities |
2,587 | 1,676 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
10,937 | 9,674 | ||||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Acquisition and development of real estate properties |
(44,462 | ) | (25,537 | ) | ||||
Funding of mortgages and notes receivable |
(12,642 | ) | (48,780 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of real estate |
6,624 | 3,775 | ||||||
Proceeds from mortgage repayment by consolidated variable interest entity |
35,057 | | ||||||
Proceeds from mortgages and notes receivable repayments |
4,725 | 18 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(10,698 | ) | (70,524 | ) | ||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net borrowings on unsecured credit facility |
26,000 | 164,000 | ||||||
Repayments on notes and bonds payable |
(1,213 | ) | (806 | ) | ||||
Repurchase of notes payable |
| (280,201 | ) | |||||
Dividends paid |
(23,387 | ) | (20,245 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
281 | 90,012 | ||||||
Common stock redemptions |
(45 | ) | (51 | ) | ||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interest holders |
| (226 | ) | |||||
Purchase of noncontrolling interests |
| (1,591 | ) | |||||
Debt issuance costs |
(3 | ) | (356 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
1,633 | (49,464 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
1,872 | (110,314 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
4,738 | 113,321 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 6,610 | $ | 3,007 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Supplemental Cash Flow Information: |
||||||||
Interest paid |
$ | 26,389 | $ | 22,374 | ||||
Capitalized interest |
$ | 1,835 | $ | 1,969 | ||||
Company-financed real estate property sales |
$ | 7,450 | $ | 2,700 | ||||
Invoices accrued for construction, tenant improvement and other capitalized costs |
$ | 7,129 | $ | 13,223 | ||||
Construction liabilities transferred upon deconsolidation of variable interest entity |
$ | 3,450 | $ | |
The accompanying notes, together with the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Business Overview
Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated (the Company) is a real estate investment trust (REIT) that integrates owning, managing, financing and developing income-producing real estate properties associated primarily with the delivery of outpatient healthcare services throughout the United States. The Company had investments of approximately $2.9 billion in 210 real estate properties and mortgages as of March 31, 2012. The Companys 202 owned real estate properties are located in 28 states and total approximately 13.7 million square feet. The Company provided property management services to approximately 10.4 million square feet nationwide.
Principles of Consolidation
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly-owned subsidiaries, joint ventures, partnerships and certain variable interest entities (VIEs) where the Company controls the operating activities.
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements that are included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. Management believes, however, that all adjustments of a normal, recurring nature considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
This interim financial information should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in this report and in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. This interim financial information does not necessarily represent or indicate what the operating results will be for the year ending December 31, 2012 for many reasons including, but not limited to, acquisitions, dispositions, capital financing transactions, changes in interest rates and the effects of other trends, risks, and uncertainties.
In January 2012, a construction mortgage note receivable totaling approximately $35.1 million was repaid in full. The construction mortgage note was funding the ongoing development of an inpatient facility in South Dakota that was leased by Sanford Health. In the third quarter of 2011, the Company began consolidating the construction project upon its conclusion that it was the primary beneficiary of the VIE that was constructing the facility. As a result of the consolidation of the VIE, the Company also eliminated the construction mortgage note and related interest on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Upon repayment of the mortgage note, the Company deconsolidated the VIE and recognized net mortgage interest income of $0.4 million and overhead expense of $0.1 million, resulting in a net gain to the Company of $0.3 million.
The Company also had a variable interest in two unconsolidated VIEs consisting of construction mortgage notes aggregating approximately $53.1 million at March 31, 2012 in which management concluded that the Company was not currently the primary beneficiary.
The Company has an investment in one unconsolidated joint venture of approximately $1.3 million at March 31, 2012 which the Company accounts for under the cost method since the Company does not exert significant influence. The joint venture, which invests in real estate properties, is included in other assets on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, and the related distributions received are included in interest and other income, net on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
5
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-Continued
Use of Estimates in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Preparation of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
Segment Reporting
The Company owns, acquires, manages, finances, and develops outpatient and other healthcare-related properties. The Company is managed as one reporting unit, rather than multiple reporting units, for internal reporting purposes and for internal decision-making. Therefore, the Company discloses its operating results in a single reportable segment.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Assets sold or held for sale, and related liabilities, have been reclassified in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, and the operating results of those assets have been reclassified from continuing to discontinued operations for all periods presented.
Revenue Recognition
General
The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. There are four criteria that must be met before a company may recognize revenue, including: persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered (i.e., the tenant has taken possession of and controls the physical use of the leased asset); the price has been fixed or is determinable; and collectability is reasonably assured. Income received but not yet earned is deferred until such time it is earned. Deferred revenue is included in other liabilities in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The Company derives most of its revenues from its real estate and mortgage notes receivable portfolio. The Companys rental and mortgage interest income is recognized based on contractual arrangements with its tenants, sponsors or borrowers. These contractual arrangements generally fall into three categories: leases, mortgage notes receivable, and property operating agreements as described in the following paragraphs. The Company may accrue late fees based on the contractual terms of a lease or note. Such fees, if accrued, are included in single-tenant net lease revenue, property operating income, or mortgage interest income in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, based on the type of contractual agreement.
Rental Income
Rental income related to non-cancelable operating leases is recognized as earned over the life of the lease agreements on a straight-line basis. The Companys lease agreements generally include provisions for stated annual increases or increases based on a Consumer Price Index. The Companys multi-tenant office lease arrangements also generally allow for operating expense recoveries which the Company calculates and bills to its tenants. Rental income from properties under single-tenant net lease arrangements (formerly named master leases) is included in single-tenant net lease revenue and rental income from properties with multi-tenant office lease arrangements is included in property operating income in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Companys leases formerly named as master leases, have over time changed from single tenant leases with underlying sub-tenants occupying the majority of the buildings to buildings that are leased and occupied by a single tenant. As such, the Company has renamed the revenues from these types of agreements to single-tenant net leases to describe more fully the nature of these leases.
Interest Income
Mortgage interest income and notes receivable interest income are recognized based on the interest rates and maturity date or amortization period specific to each note. Loan origination fees received are deferred and are recognized in mortgage interest income over the estimated life of the loan.
Property Operating Agreements
At March 31, 2012, the Company had six real estate properties with an aggregate gross investment of approximately $73.4 million subject to property operating agreements that obligate the sponsoring health system to provide to the Company a minimum return on the Companys investment in the property in exchange for the right to be involved in
6
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-Continued
the operating decisions of the property, including tenancy. If the minimum return is not achieved through normal operations of the property, the sponsor is responsible to the Company for the shortfall under the terms of these agreements. The Company recognizes any shortfall income in other operating income in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Property operating agreement payments totaling approximately $0.5 million per quarter on two of the Companys properties in New Orleans expired on September 30, 2011. No other property operating agreements are scheduled to expire until 2016.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Certain items must be included in comprehensive income (loss), including items such as foreign currency translation adjustments, minimum pension liability adjustments, and unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities. The Companys accumulated other comprehensive loss includes the cumulative pension liability adjustments, which are generally recognized in the fourth quarter of each year.
Income Taxes
No provision has been made for federal income taxes. The Company intends at all times to qualify as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Company must distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income each year to its stockholders and meet other requirements to continue to qualify as a REIT.
The Company must pay certain state income taxes and the provisions are generally included in general and administrative expense on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company classifies interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if any, in its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as a component of general and administrative expense. No such amounts were recognized during the first quarter of 2012 or during 2011.
Incentive Plans
The Company has various employee and non-employee stock-based awards outstanding, including restricted stock issued under its incentive plans, and options granted to employees pursuant to its employee stock purchase plan (the Employee Stock Purchase Plan). The Company generally recognizes compensation expense for awards issued under its incentive plans based on the grant date fair value of the awards ratably over the requisite service period. Compensation expense for awards issued under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan is based on fair value, net of estimated forfeitures, using the Black-Sholes model, and is generally recognized when the awards are granted in the first quarter of each year since they immediately vest when granted.
Defined Benefit Pension Plan
The Company has a pension plan (the Executive Retirement Plan) under which three of the Companys founding officers may receive certain retirement benefits upon retirement. The plan is unfunded and benefits will be paid from future cash flows of the Company. The maximum annual benefits payable to each individual under the Executive Retirement Plan is $896,000, subject to cost-of-living adjustments. The Company calculates pension expense and the corresponding liability annually on the measurement date (December 31) which requires certain assumptions, such as a discount rate and the recognition of actuarial gains and losses. Pension expense is recognized on an accrual basis over an estimated service period.
Operating Leases
As described in more detail in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company is obligated under operating lease agreements consisting primarily of its corporate office lease and various ground leases related to the Companys real estate investments where the Company is the lessee.
Discontinued Operations and Assets Held for Sale
The Company sells properties from time to time due to a variety of factors, including among other things, market conditions or the exercise of purchase options by tenants. The operating results of properties that have been sold or are held for sale are reported as discontinued operations in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. A
7
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-Continued
company must report discontinued operations when a component of an entity has either been disposed of or is deemed to be held for sale if (i) both the operations and cash flows of the component have been or will be eliminated from ongoing operations as a result of the disposal transaction, and (ii) the entity will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the component after the disposal transaction. Long-lived assets classified as held for sale in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or their estimated fair value less cost to sell. Further, depreciation of these assets ceases at the time the assets are classified as discontinued operations. Losses resulting from the sale or anticipated sale of such properties are characterized as impairment losses relating to discontinued operations in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. See Note 3 for a detail of the Companys assets held for sale and discontinued operations.
Land Held for Development
Land held for development, which is included in construction in progress in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, includes parcels of land owned by the Company upon which the Company intends to develop and own outpatient healthcare facilities.
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants. In calculating fair value, a company must maximize the use of observable market inputs, minimize the use of unobservable market inputs and disclose in the form of an outlined hierarchy the details of such fair value measurements.
A hierarchy of valuation techniques is defined to determine whether the inputs to a fair value measurement are considered to be observable or unobservable in a marketplace. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Companys market assumptions. This hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available. These inputs have created the following fair value hierarchy:
Level 1 quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets;
Level 2 quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and
Level 3 fair value measurements derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.
In connection with the sale of two medical office buildings in the first quarter of 2012, the Company recorded impairment charges totaling approximately $0.4 million based on the contractual sales prices, a level one input. In addition, the Company recorded an impairment charge totaling approximately $3.8 million on a building currently classified as held for sale based on a brokers opinion of value, a level three input.
Real Estate Properties
Real estate properties are recorded at cost or fair value, if acquired. Cost or fair value at the time of acquisition is allocated between land, buildings, tenant improvements, lease and other intangibles, and personal property.
The Company also capitalizes direct construction and development costs, including interest, to all consolidated real estate properties that are under construction and substantive activities are ongoing to prepare the asset for its intended use. The Company considers a building as substantially complete and held available for occupancy upon the completion of tenant improvements, but no later than one year from cessation of major construction activity. Development costs incurred after a project is substantially complete and ready for its intended use, or after development activities have ceased, are expensed as incurred.
8
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-Continued
Mortgage Notes
Mortgage notes receivable may be classified as held-for-investment or held-for-sale based on a lenders intent and ability to hold the loans. Notes held-for-investment are carried at amortized cost and are reduced by valuation allowances for estimated credit losses as necessary. Notes held-for-sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. All of the Companys notes receivable are classified as held-for-investment.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Credit Losses
Management monitors the aging and collectibility of its accounts receivable balances on an ongoing basis. Whenever deterioration in the timeliness of payment from a tenant or sponsor is noted, management investigates and determines the reason(s) for the delay. Considering all information gathered, managements judgment is exercised in determining whether a receivable is potentially uncollectible and, if so, how much or what percentage may be uncollectible. Among the factors management considers in determining collectibility are: the type of contractual arrangement under which the receivable was recorded (e.g., a triple net lease, a gross lease, a sponsor guaranty agreement, or some other type of agreement); the tenants reason for slow payment; industry influences under which the tenant operates; evidence of willingness and ability of the tenant to pay the receivable; credit-worthiness of the tenant; collateral, security deposit, letters of credit or other monies held as security; tenants historical payment pattern; other contractual agreements between the tenant and the Company; relationship between the tenant and the Company; the state in which the tenant operates; and the existence of a guarantor and the willingness and ability of the guarantor to pay the receivable. Considering these factors and others, management concludes whether all or some of the aged receivable balance is likely uncollectible. Upon determining that some portion of the receivable is likely uncollectible, the Company records a provision for bad debts for the amount it expects will be uncollectible. When efforts to collect a receivable are exhausted, the receivable amount is charged off against the allowance.
The Company also evaluates collectibility of its mortgage notes and notes receivable and records an allowance on the notes as necessary. A loan is impaired when it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan as scheduled, including both contractual interest and principal payments. If a mortgage loan or note receivable becomes past due, the Company will review the specific circumstances and may discontinue the accrual of interest on the loan. The loan is not returned to accrual status until the debtor has demonstrated the ability to continue debt service in accordance with the contractual terms. Loans placed on non-accrual status will be accounted for either on a cash basis, in which income is recognized only upon receipt of cash, or on a cost-recovery basis, in which all cash receipts reduce the carrying value of the loan, based on the Companys expectation of future collectibility.
New Pronouncements
On January 1, 2012, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standard Boards Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-08, Intangibles Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), Testing Goodwill for Impairment. The standard simplifies the process a company must go through to test goodwill for impairment. Companies have an option to first assess qualitative factors of a reporting unit being tested before having to assess quantitative factors. If a company believes no impairment exists based on qualitative factors, then it will no longer be required to perform the two-step quantitative impairment test. The Company tests its $3.5 million of goodwill for impairment as of December 31 of each year. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this new standard will have a material impact on the Companys testing of its goodwill for impairment or its results of operations or financial position.
9
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-Continued
Note 2. Real Estate and Mortgage Notes Receivable Investments
The Company had investments of approximately $2.9 billion in 210 real estate properties and mortgage notes receivable as of March 31, 2012. The Companys 202 owned real estate properties are located in 28 states and total approximately 13.7 million total square feet. The table below details the Companys investments.
Number of | Gross Investment | Square Feet | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars and Square Feet in thousands) |
Investments | Amount | % | Footage | % | |||||||||||||||
Owned properties: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Multi-tenant leases |
||||||||||||||||||||
Medical office/outpatient |
150 | $ | 1,803,689 | 62.1 | % | 9,874 | 72.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Medical officestabilization in progress |
11 | 368,491 | 12.7 | % | 1,186 | 8.7 | % | |||||||||||||
Other |
2 | 19,691 | 0.7 | % | 256 | 1.8 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
163 | 2,191,871 | 75.5 | % | 11,316 | 82.7 | % | ||||||||||||||
Single-tenant net leases |
||||||||||||||||||||
Medical office/outpatient |
22 | 203,115 | 7.0 | % | 1,068 | 7.8 | % | |||||||||||||
Inpatient |
14 | 337,524 | 11.6 | % | 1,103 | 8.1 | % | |||||||||||||
Other |
2 | 9,545 | 0.3 | % | 91 | 0.7 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
38 | 550,184 | 18.9 | % | 2,262 | 16.6 | % | ||||||||||||||
Construction in progress |
||||||||||||||||||||
Medical office/outpatient |
1 | 10,864 | 0.3 | % | 96 | 0.7 | % | |||||||||||||
Land held for development |
| 25,171 | 0.9 | % | | | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
1 | 36,035 | 1.2 | % | 96 | 0.7 | % | ||||||||||||||
Corporate property |
| 14,678 | 0.5 | % | | | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| 14,678 | 0.5 | % | | | % | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total owned properties |
202 | 2,792,768 | 96.1 | % | 13,674 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Mortgage notes receivable: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Medical office/outpatient |
5 | 45,387 | 1.6 | % | | | ||||||||||||||
Inpatient |
1 | 27,380 | 0.9 | % | | | ||||||||||||||
Other |
1 | 40,000 | 1.4 | % | | | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
7 | 112,767 | 3.9 | % | | | |||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated joint venture: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
1 | 1,266 | | % | | | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
1 | 1,266 | | % | | | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total real estate investments |
210 | $ | 2,906,801 | 100.0 | % | 13,674 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Notes Receivable
All of the Companys mortgage notes receivable are classified as held-for-investment based on managements intent and ability to hold the loans until maturity. As such, the loans are carried at amortized cost. A summary of the Companys mortgage notes receivable is shown in the table below:
(Dollars in thousands) |
March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | ||||||
Construction mortgage notes |
$ | 62,645 | $ | 51,471 | ||||
Other mortgage loans |
50,122 | 45,910 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 112,767 | $ | 97,381 | |||||
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2012, approximately $53.1 million, or 47.1%, of the Companys mortgage notes receivable were due from affiliates of the United Trust Fund, which is developing two build-to-suit facilities that are fully leased to Mercy Health. Also, approximately $40.0 million, or 35.5%, of the Companys mortgage notes receivable were due from LB Properties X, LLC.
10
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-Continued
Note 3. Acquisitions and Dispositions
Real Estate Acquisitions
In January 2012, the Company purchased a 58,285 square foot medical office building in South Dakota for cash consideration of approximately $15.0 million. The property is 100% leased under a single-tenant net lease, which expires in 2022, with an affiliate of AA- rated Sanford Health, with a parent guarantee. The property is connected to a new Sanford Health acute care hospital that is currently under construction and is expected to open in June 2012.
In February 2012, the Company purchased a 23,312 square foot medical office building in North Carolina for cash consideration of approximately $6.4 million. The building is 100% occupied by two tenants with an affiliate of AA- rated Carolinas Healthcare System (CHS) occupying 93% of the building. The property is adjacent to a CHS hospital campus where the Company currently owns six medical office buildings totaling approximately 187,000 square feet.
In March 2012, the Company acquired the fee simple interest in 9.14 acres of land in Pennsylvania for cash consideration of approximately $1.2 million. The Company previously held a ground lease interest in this property.
Mortgage Note Financings
In January 2012, the Company originated a $3.0 million seller-financed mortgage note receivable with the purchaser of two medical office buildings located in Texas that were sold by the Company as discussed in Asset Dispositions below. The note has a stated fixed interest rate of 7.25% and matures in January 2014.
In March 2012, the Company originated a $4.5 million seller-financed mortgage note receivable with the purchaser of a medical office building located in Texas that was sold by the Company as discussed in Asset Dispositions below. This note was repaid in April 2012.
The following table details the Companys acquisitions and mortgage note financings for the three months ended March 31, 2012:
(Dollars in millions) |
Date Acquired |
Cash Consideration |
Real Estate |
Mortgage Note Financing |
Other | Square Footage |
||||||||||||||||||
Real estate acquisitions |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
South Dakota |
1/20/12 | $ | 15.0 | $ | 14.9 | $ | | $ | 0.1 | 58,285 | ||||||||||||||
North Carolina |
2/10/12 | 6.4 | 6.4 | | | 23,312 | ||||||||||||||||||
Pennsylvania |
3/16/12 | 1.2 | 1.1 | | 0.1 | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
22.6 | 22.4 | | 0.2 | 81,597 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage note financings |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Texas |
1/10/12 | 3.0 | | 3.0 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Texas |
3/16/12 | 4.5 | | 4.5 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
7.5 | | 7.5 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
$ | 30.1 | $ | 22.4 | $ | 7.5 | $ | 0.2 | 81,597 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-Continued
Asset Dispositions
During the first quarter of 2012, the Company disposed of the following properties and mortgage notes:
| a 14,748 square foot medical office building and an 18,978 square foot medical office building, both in Texas, in which the Company had an aggregate net investment of approximately $2.5 million, for total consideration of approximately $3.4 million. The Company received approximately $0.4 million in net cash proceeds, including prepaid interest, originated a $3.0 million seller-financed mortgage note receivable as discussed above in Mortgage Note Financings, and recognized a $0.9 million net gain on the disposal; |
| a 35,752 square foot medical office building in Florida, in which the Company had a net investment of approximately $3.0 million, for total consideration of approximately $5.7 million. The Company received approximately $5.7 million in net cash proceeds and a lease termination fee of $1.5 million which is recorded in income from discontinued operations. The Company also recognized a $2.5 million net gain on the disposal; |
| a 33,895 square foot medical office building in Florida in which the Company had a net investment of approximately $0.5 million for total consideration of approximately $0.5 million; |
| an 82,664 square foot medical office building in Texas, in which the Company had a net investment of approximately $4.8 million, for a purchase price of approximately $4.7 million. The Company originated a $4.5 million seller-financed mortgage note receivable as discussed above in Mortgage Note Financings and recognized a $0.4 million impairment on the disposal, net of straight-line rent written off and closing costs; |
| two mortgage notes receivable of $1.5 million and $3.2 million for total consideration of approximately $4.7 million; and |
| a construction mortgage note receivable totaling approximately $35.1 million which was repaid in full. The construction mortgage note was funding the ongoing development of an inpatient facility in South Dakota that was leased by Sanford Health. In the third quarter of 2011, the Company began consolidating the construction project upon its conclusion that it was the primary beneficiary of the VIE that was constructing the facility. As a result of the consolidation of the VIE, the Company also eliminated the construction mortgage note and related interest on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Upon repayment of the mortgage note, the Company deconsolidated the VIE and recognized net mortgage interest income of $0.4 million and overhead expense of $0.1 million, resulting in a net gain to the Company of $0.3 million. The Company also received $0.3 million in fees which are recorded in other operating income. |
12
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-Continued
The following table details the Companys dispositions and mortgage note repayments for the three months ended March 31, 2012:
(Dollars in millions) |
Date Disposed |
Net Proceeds |
Net Real Estate Investment |
Other (including receivables) |
Mortgage Note Receivable |
Gain/ (Impairment) |
Square Footage |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate dispositions |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Texas (2 properties) (1) |
1/10/12 | $ | 0.4 | $ | 2.5 | $ | | $ | (3.0 | ) | $ | 0.9 | 33,726 | |||||||||||||||
Florida (1) |
1/19/12 | 5.7 | 3.0 | 0.2 | | 2.5 | 35,752 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Florida (1) |
3/02/12 | 0.5 | 0.5 | | | | 33,895 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Texas (1) |
3/16/12 | | 4.8 | 0.1 | (4.5 | ) | (0.4 | ) | 82,664 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
6.6 | 10.8 | 0.3 | (7.5 | ) | 3.0 | 186,037 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage note repayments |
|
4.7 | | | 4.7 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Deconsolidation of VIE (2) |
|
35.1 | 38.2 | (3.4 | ) | | 0.3 | 113,602 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total dispositions and repayments |
|
$ | 46.4 | $ | 49.0 | $ | (3.1 | ) | $ | (2.8 | ) | $ | 3.3 | 299,639 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Previously included in assets held for sale. |
(2) | Other includes construction liabilities transferred upon deconsolidation. Gain includes $0.4 million of net mortgage interest income recognized, partially offset by $0.1 million of general and administrative overhead expense that had been capitalized into the project that was reversed upon deconsolidation. |
Subsequent Dispositions
In April 2012, the Company disposed of five medical office buildings located in Florida for a purchase price of $33.3 million in which the Company had a net aggregate investment of approximately $31.8 million. The Company received approximately $32.4 million in cash consideration from the sale, including the origination of a $3.8 million seller-financed mortgage note and a $0.6 million contingent liability. The Company expects to recognize an immaterial impairment charge in the second quarter of 2012 from the sale. These properties were not classified as held for sale at March 31, 2012.
In April 2012, the Company disposed of a medical office building in Tennessee, included in held for sale at March 31, 2012, in which the Company had a net investment of approximately $0.8 million. The Company received approximately $0.9 million in net cash proceeds and expects to recognize a gain of approximately $0.1 million in the second quarter of 2012.
Discontinued Operations and Assets Held for Sale
The following tables detail the assets, liabilities, and results of operations included in discontinued operations on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and in assets and liabilities of discontinued operations on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had 10 and 15 properties, respectively, classified as held for sale. During the first quarter of 2012, the Company recorded a $1.5 million lease termination fee related to the sale of a medical office building in Florida which is included in single-tenant net lease revenue in discontinued operations and recorded a $3.8 million impairment charge on a building that is currently classified as held for sale. Of the 15 properties classified as held for sale at December 31, 2011, three properties in Texas and two properties in Florida were sold during the first quarter of 2012.
13
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-Continued
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Balance Sheet data (as of the period ended): |
||||||||
Land |
$ | 5,748 | $ | 8,078 | ||||
Buildings, improvements and lease intangibles |
25,041 | 44,299 | ||||||
Personal property |
440 | 458 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
31,229 | 52,835 | |||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
(17,532 | ) | (24,557 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Assets held for sale, net |
13,697 | 28,278 | ||||||
Other assets, net (including receivables) |
65 | 372 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Assets of discontinued operations, net |
65 | 372 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Assets held for sale and discontinued operations, net |
$ | 13,762 | $ | 28,650 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
$ | 62 | $ | 404 | ||||
Other liabilities |
92 | 114 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Liabilities of discontinued operations |
$ | 154 | $ | 518 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Statements of Operations data (for the period ended): |
||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||
Property operating |
$ | 150 | $ | 307 | ||||
Single-tenant net lease |
2,216 | 1,248 | ||||||
Straight-line rent |
| (42 | ) | |||||
Other operating |
6 | 3 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
2,372 | 1,516 | |||||||
Expenses |
||||||||
Property operating |
424 | 658 | ||||||
General and administrative |
1 | 2 | ||||||
Depreciation |
| 263 | ||||||
Amortization |
| (8 | ) | |||||
Bad debt, net |
(1 | ) | 15 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
424 | 930 | |||||||
Other Income (Expense) |
||||||||
Interest and other income, net |
25 | 6 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
25 | 6 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Discontinued Operations |
||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
1,973 | 592 | ||||||
Impairments |
(4,170 | ) | (147 | ) | ||||
Gain on sales of real estate properties |
3,428 | 36 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income from Discontinued Operations |
$ | 1,231 | $ | 481 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income from Discontinued Operations per Common ShareBasic |
$ | 0.02 | $ | 0.00 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income from Discontinued Operations per Common ShareDiluted |
$ | 0.02 | $ | 0.00 | ||||
|
|
|
|
14
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-Continued
Note 4. Notes and Bonds Payable
The table below details the Companys notes and bonds payable as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
(Dollars in thousands) |
March 31, 2012 |
December 31, 2011 |
Maturity Dates |
Contractual Interest Rates |
Principal Payments |
Interest Payments | ||||||||||
Unsecured Credit Facility |
$ | 238,000 | $ | 212,000 | 10/15 | LIBOR + 1.50% | At maturity | Quarterly | ||||||||
Senior Notes due 2014, net of discount |
264,408 | 264,371 | 4/14 | 5.125% | At maturity | Semi-Annual | ||||||||||
Senior Notes due 2017, net of discount |
298,529 | 298,465 | 1/17 | 6.500% | At maturity | Semi-Annual | ||||||||||
Senior Notes due 2021, net of discount |
397,114 | 397,052 | 1/21 | 5.750% | At maturity | Semi-Annual | ||||||||||
Mortgage notes payable, net of discount and including premiums |
220,520 | 221,649 | 4/13-10/30 | 5.000%-7.625% | Monthly | Monthly | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
$ | 1,418,571 | $ | 1,393,537 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
The Companys various debt agreements contain certain representations, warranties, and financial and other covenants customary in such loan agreements. Among other things, these provisions require the Company to maintain certain financial ratios and minimum tangible net worth and impose certain limits on the Companys ability to incur indebtedness and create liens or encumbrances. At March 31, 2012, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenant provisions under all of its various debt instruments.
Unsecured Credit Facility
On October 14, 2011, the Company entered into a $700.0 million unsecured credit facility due 2015 (the Unsecured Credit Facility) with a syndicate of 17 lenders that matures on October 14, 2015 with an option to extend the facility for one additional year for an extension fee of 0.20% of the aggregate commitments. Amounts outstanding under the Unsecured Credit Facility bear interest at LIBOR plus the applicable margin rate (defined as a range of 1.075% to 1.900% depending on the Companys unsecured debt ratings, currently 1.5%). In addition, the Company pays a 0.35% facility fee per annum on the aggregate amount of commitments. The facility fee ranges from 0.175% per annum to 0.45% per annum, based on the Companys unsecured debt ratings. At March 31, 2012, the Company had $238.0 million outstanding under the Unsecured Credit Facility with a weighted average interest rate of approximately 1.75% and a remaining borrowing capacity of approximately $462.0 million.
Senior Notes due 2014
In 2004, the Company issued $300.0 million of unsecured senior notes due 2014 (the Senior Notes due 2014). The Senior Notes due 2014 bear interest at 5.125% per annum, payable semi-annually on April 1 and October 1, and are due on April 1, 2014, unless redeemed earlier by the Company. The notes were issued at a discount of approximately $1.5 million, which yielded a 5.19% interest rate per annum upon issuance. In previous years, the Company repurchased approximately $35.3 million of the Senior Notes due 2014 and amortized a pro-rata portion of the discount upon the repurchases. The following table reconciles the balance of the Senior Notes due 2014 on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Senior Notes due 2014 face value |
$ | 264,737 | $ | 264,737 | ||||
Unaccreted discount |
(329 | ) | (366 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Senior Notes due 2014 carrying amount |
$ | 264,408 | $ | 264,371 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Senior Notes due 2017
On December 4, 2009, the Company issued $300.0 million of unsecured senior notes due 2017 (the Senior Notes due 2017). The Senior Notes due 2017 bear interest at 6.50% per annum, payable semi-annually on January 17 and July 17, and are due on January 17, 2017, unless redeemed earlier by the Company. The notes were issued at a discount of approximately $2.0 million, which yielded a 6.618% interest rate per annum upon issuance. The following table reconciles the balance of the Senior Notes due 2017 on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
15
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-Continued
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Senior Notes due 2017 face value |
$ | 300,000 | $ | 300,000 | ||||
Unaccreted discount |
(1,471 | ) | (1,535 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Senior Notes due 2017 carrying amount |
$ | 298,529 | $ | 298,465 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Senior Notes due 2021
On December 13, 2010, the Company issued $400.0 million of unsecured senior notes due 2021 (the Senior Notes due 2021). The Senior Notes due 2021 bear interest at 5.75% per annum, payable semi-annually on January 15 and July 15, beginning July 15, 2011, and are due on January 15, 2021, unless redeemed earlier by the Company. The notes were issued at a discount of approximately $3.2 million, which yielded a 5.855% interest rate per annum upon issuance. The following table reconciles the balance of the Senior Notes due 2021 on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Senior Notes due 2021 face value |
$ | 400,000 | $ | 400,000 | ||||
Unaccreted discount |
(2,886 | ) | (2,948 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Senior Notes due 2021 carrying amount |
$ | 397,114 | $ | 397,052 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Notes Payable
The following table reconciles the Companys aggregate mortgage notes principal balance with the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Mortgage notes payable principal balance |
$ | 224,164 | $ | 225,377 | ||||
Unaccreted discount, net of premium |
(3,644 | ) | (3,728 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Mortgage notes payable carrying amount |
$ | 220,520 | $ | 221,649 | ||||
|
|
|
|
16
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-Continued
The following table further details the Companys mortgage notes payable, with related collateral, at March 31, 2012.
Effective Interest |
Investment in Collateral at |
Balance at | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
Original Balance |
Rate (18) |
Maturity Date |
Collateral (19) |
Payments (14) |
Mar. 31, 2012 |
Mar. 31, 2012 |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||||
Life Insurance Co. |
$ | 4.7 | 7.765 | % | 1/17 | MOB | Monthly/20-yr amort. | $ | 11.7 | $ | 1.8 | $ | 1.9 | |||||||||||||
Commercial Bank |
1.8 | 5.550 | % | 10/30 | OTH | Monthly/27-yr amort. | 7.9 | 1.6 | 1.6 | |||||||||||||||||
Life Insurance Co. |
15.1 | 5.490 | % | 1/16 | MOB | Monthly/10-yr amort. | 32.7 | 13.0 | 13.1 | |||||||||||||||||
Commercial Bank (1) |
17.4 | 6.480 | % | 5/15 | MOB | Monthly/10-yr amort. | 19.9 | 14.5 | 14.5 | |||||||||||||||||
Commercial Bank (2) |
12.0 | 6.110 | % | 7/15 | 2 MOBs | Monthly/10-yr amort. | 19.5 | 9.8 | 9.8 | |||||||||||||||||
Commercial Bank (3) |
15.2 | 7.650 | % | 7/20 | MOB | (15) | 20.2 | 12.8 | 12.8 | |||||||||||||||||
Life Insurance Co. (4) |
1.5 | 6.810 | % | 7/16 | MOB | Monthly/9-yr amort. | 2.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | |||||||||||||||||
Commercial Bank (5) |
12.9 | 6.430 | % | 2/21 | MOB | Monthly/12-yr amort. | 20.6 | 11.4 | 11.4 | |||||||||||||||||
Investment Fund |
80.0 | 7.250 | % | 12/16 | 15 MOBs | Monthly/30-yr amort. (16) | 155.0 | 78.2 | 78.4 | |||||||||||||||||
Life Insurance Co. |
7.0 | 5.530 | % | 1/18 | MOB | Monthly/15-yr amort. | 14.5 | 3.4 | 3.5 | |||||||||||||||||
Investment Co. (6) |
15.9 | 6.550 | % | 4/13 | MOB | Monthly/30-yr amort. (17) | 23.3 | 15.2 | 15.2 | |||||||||||||||||
Investment Co. |
4.6 | 5.250 | % | 9/15 | MOB | Monthly/10-yr amort. | 6.9 | 4.3 | 4.3 | |||||||||||||||||
Life Insurance Co. (7) |
13.9 | 4.700 | % | 1/16 | MOB | Monthly/25-yr amort. | 26.4 | 12.3 | 12.4 | |||||||||||||||||
Life Insurance Co. (8) |
21.5 | 4.700 | % | 8/15 | MOB | Monthly/25-yr amort. | 43.8 | 18.6 | 18.8 | |||||||||||||||||
Insurance Co. (9) |
7.3 | 5.100 | % | 12/18 | MOB | Monthly/25-yr amort. | 14.6 | 7.4 | 7.5 | |||||||||||||||||
Commercial Bank (10) |
8.1 | 4.540 | % | 8/16 | MOB | Monthly/10-yr amort. | 15.1 | 7.7 | 7.7 | |||||||||||||||||
Life Insurance Co. (11) (12) |
5.3 | 4.060 | % | 11/14 | MOB | Monthly/25-yr amort. | 11.6 | 4.7 | 4.8 | |||||||||||||||||
Life Insurance Co. (13) |
3.1 | 4.060 | % | 11/14 | MOB | Monthly/25-yr amort. | 6.7 | 2.7 | 2.8 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 452.5 | $ | 220.5 | $ | 221.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | The unaccreted portion of a $2.7 million discount recorded on this note upon acquisition is included in the balance above. |
(2) | The unaccreted portion of a $2.1 million discount recorded on this note upon acquisition is included in the balance above. |
(3) | The unaccreted portion of a $2.4 million discount recorded on this note upon acquisition is included in the balance above. |
(4) | The unaccreted portion of a $0.2 million discount recorded on this note upon acquisition is included in the balance above. |
(5) | The unaccreted portion of a $1.0 million discount recorded on this note upon acquisition is included in the balance above. |
(6) | The unamortized portion of a $0.5 million premium recorded on this note upon acquisition is included in the balance above. |
(7) | The unamortized portion of a $0.3 million premium recorded on this note upon acquisition is included in the balance above. |
(8) | The unamortized portion of a $0.4 million premium recorded on this note upon acquisition is included in the balance above. |
(9) | The unamortized portion of the $0.6 million premium recorded on this note upon acquisition is included in the balance above. |
(10) | The unamortized portion of the $0.2 million premium recorded on this note upon acquisition is included in the balance above. |
(11) | Balance consists of two notes secured by the same building. |
(12) | The unamortized portions of the $0.3 million premium recorded on these notes upon acquisition are included in the balance above. |
(13) | The unamortized portion of the $0.2 million premium recorded on this note upon acquisition is included in the balance above. |
(14) | Payable in monthly installments of principal and interest with the final payment due at maturity (unless otherwise noted). |
(15) | Payable in monthly installments of interest only for 24 months and then installments of principal and interest based on an 11-year amortization with the final payment due at maturity. |
(16) | The Company has the option to extend the maturity for two, one-year floating rate extension terms. |
(17) | The Company has the option to extend the maturity for three years at a fixed rate of 6.75%. |
(18) | The contractual interest rates for the 19 outstanding mortgage notes ranged from 5.00% to 7.625% at March 31, 2012. |
(19) | MOB-Medical office building; OTH-Other. |
17
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-Continued
Long-Term Debt Maturities
Future contractual maturities of the Companys notes and bonds payable as of March 31, 2012 were:
(Dollars in thousands) |
Principal Maturities |
Net Accretion/ Amortization (1) |
Notes and Bonds Payable |
% | ||||||||||||
2012 (remaining) |
$ | 3,735 | $ | (772 | ) | $ | 2,963 | 0.2 | % | |||||||
2013 |
19,781 | (1,263 | ) | 18,518 | 1.3 | % | ||||||||||
2014 |
276,349 | (1,404 | ) | 274,945 | 19.4 | % | ||||||||||
2015 |
287,775 | (1,215 | ) | 286,560 | 20.2 | % | ||||||||||
2016 |
106,376 | (907 | ) | 105,469 | 7.4 | % | ||||||||||
2017 and thereafter |
732,885 | (2,769 | ) | 730,116 | 51.5 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | 1,426,901 | $ | (8,330 | ) | $ | 1,418,571 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Includes discount accretion and premium amortization related to the Companys Senior Notes due 2014, Senior Notes due 2017, Senior Notes due 2021 and 13 mortgage notes payable. |
Note 5. Other Assets
Other assets consist primarily of prepaid assets, straight-line rent receivables, intangible assets and receivables. Items included in other assets on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are detailed in the table below.
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
(in thousands) |
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Prepaid assets |
$ | 44.9 | $ | 45.0 | ||||
Straight-line rent receivables |
32.3 | 30.3 | ||||||
Above-market intangible assets, net |
13.2 | 13.3 | ||||||
Deferred financing costs, net |
13.0 | 13.8 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
7.0 | 8.2 | ||||||
Goodwill |
3.5 | 3.5 | ||||||
Customer relationship intangible assets, net |
2.1 | 2.1 | ||||||
Equity investments in joint venturecost method |
1.3 | 1.3 | ||||||
Notes receivable, net |
0.3 | 0.3 | ||||||
Allowance for uncollectible accounts |
(0.5 | ) | (0.6 | ) | ||||
Other |
1.0 | 1.2 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 118.1 | $ | 118.4 | |||||
|
|
|
|
Note 6. Commitments and Contingencies
Development Activity
The Company had several development projects ongoing at March 31, 2012, including one construction project, three construction mortgage notes and eleven properties in the process of stabilization subsequent to construction as detailed in the following table.
(Dollars in thousands) |
Number of Properties |
Funded During Three Months Ended Mar. 31, 2012 |
Total Amount Funded Through Mar. 31, 2012 |
Estimated Remaining Fundings |
Estimated Total Investment |
Approximate Square Feet |
||||||||||||||||||
Construction in progress (1) |
1 | $ | 3,094 | $ | 10,864 | $ | 7,221 | $ | 18,085 | 96,433 | ||||||||||||||
Mortgage construction notes |
3 | 12,642 | 62,645 | 152,413 | 215,058 | 462,712 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stabilization in progress (1) |
11 | 8,779 | 368,491 | 23,409 | 391,900 | 1,185,863 | ||||||||||||||||||
Land held for development |
| (5 | ) | 25,171 | | | | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
15 | $ | 24,510 | $ | 467,171 | $ | 183,043 | $ | 625,043 | 1,745,008 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | The estimated total investment for each development property includes estimated tenant improvement allowances but does not include any estimate of excess tenant improvement cost financing by the Company. To the extent actual amounts funded for each development property reflect excess tenant improvement costs financed by the Company, the estimated remaining fundings could be greater than the amount shown in the table above. |
18
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-Continued
Construction in Progress
The Company had one construction project ongoing at March 31, 2012 with an estimated completion date during the third quarter of 2012. The project commenced in July 2011 and consists of a 96,433 square foot, on-campus medical office building with significant pre-leasing and a related parking garage in Texas. The project has an estimated total budget of approximately $18.1 million and is adjacent to a medical office building that the Company acquired in late 2010.
The following activity occurred relating to other projects under construction during the first quarter of 2012:
| In January 2012, a construction mortgage note receivable totaling approximately $35.1 million was repaid in full. The construction mortgage note was funding the ongoing development of an inpatient facility in South Dakota. In the third quarter of 2011, the Company began consolidating the construction project upon its conclusion that it was the primary beneficiary of the VIE that was constructing the facility. Upon repayment of the mortgage note, the Company deconsolidated the VIE and recognized net mortgage interest income of $0.4 million and overhead expense of $0.1 million, resulting in a net gain to the Company of $0.3 million; and |
| In February 2012, an on-campus medical office building in Colorado, with an estimated total budget of $21.6 million, was substantially completed and placed into service. The building was 67% leased at March 31, 2012. The building is adjacent to a medical office building of which the Company completed construction in the fourth quarter of 2011. |
The table below details the Companys construction in progress and land held for development as of March 31, 2012. The information included in the table represents managements estimates and expectations at March 31, 2012, which are subject to change. The Companys disclosures regarding certain projections or estimates of completion dates may not reflect actual results.
State |
Estimated Completion Date |
Property Type (2) |
Properties | Approximate Square Feet |
CIP at March 31, 2012 |
Estimated Remaining Funding |
Estimated Total Investment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Under construction (1): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Texas |
3Q 2012 | MOB | 1 | 96,433 | $ | 10,864 | $ | 7,221 | $ | 18,085 | ||||||||||||||||||
Land held for development: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Iowa |
4,399 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Texas |
20,772 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
1 | 96,433 | $ | 36,035 | $ | 7,221 | $ | 18,085 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | The estimated total investment for each development property includes estimated tenant improvement allowances but does not include any estimate of excess tenant improvement cost financing by the Company. To the extent actual amounts funded for each development property reflect excess tenant improvement costs financed by the Company, the estimated remaining fundings could be greater than the amount shown in the table above. |
(2) | MOB-Medical office building. |
Construction Mortgage Notes
The Company had three construction mortgage notes totalling $62.6 million at March 31, 2012. The Company expects that the remaining funding commitments totaling $152.4 million on these notes at will be funded during 2012 and 2013. Of this total, $149.5 million will be due from affiliates of the United Trust Fund, which is developing two build-to-suit facilities that are fully leased to Mercy Health.
Stabilization in Progress
At March 31, 2012, the Company had 11 properties that it had previously developed that were in the process of stabilization. In the aggregate, the properties were approximately 46% leased and 28% occupied at March 31, 2012, with tenant improvement build-out occurring in suites that are leased but not yet occupied by the tenants. The Companys remaining funding commitments on these properties at March 31, 2012 relates to tenant improvements. Because these properties are not yet stabilized, they generated a net operating loss of approximately $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012.
19
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-Continued
Legal Proceedings
Two affiliates of the Company, HR Acquisition of Virginia Limited Partnership and HRT Holdings, Inc., are defendants in a lawsuit brought by Fork Union Medical Investors Limited Partnership, Goochland Medical Investors Limited Partnership, and Life Care Centers of America, Inc., as plaintiffs. The plaintiffs alleged that they overpaid rent between 1991 and 2003 under leases for two skilled nursing facilities in Virginia and sought a refund of such overpayments. Plaintiffs were seeking up to $2.0 million, plus pre- and post-judgment interest and attorneys fees. The two leases were terminated by agreement in 2003. The Company denied that it was liable to the plaintiffs and filed a motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the case. The Circuit Court of Davidson County, Tennessee granted the Companys motion for summary judgment and the case was dismissed with prejudice by order entered on July 20, 2011. On August 11, 2011, the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal with the Tennessee Court of Appeals. Briefs have been filed by all parties and the Court of Appeals has scheduled oral arguments in the case for May 23, 2012. The Company believes the trial courts dismissal of the case should be affirmed but can provide no assurance as to the outcome of the appeal.
The Company is a co-defendant in a lawsuit initially filed June 28, 2011 in the District Court of Collin County, Texas captioned James P. Murphy, JPM Realty Property Management, Inc., and Rainier Medical Investments LLC v. LandPlan Development Corp., LandPlan Medical, L.P., Frisco Surgery Center Limited, Frisco POB I Limited, Frisco POB II Limited, Medland L.P., Texas Land Management, L.L.C., Jim Williams, Jr., Reed Williams, and Healthcare Realty Trust, Inc. The original plaintiffs, James P. Murphy and JPM Realty Property Management, Inc. (the Murphy Plaintiffs) allege they are due a real estate commission arising out of the sale of certain real property in Frisco, Texas (the Frisco Property). Certain affiliates of the Company purchased the Frisco Property in December 2010 from Frisco Surgery Center Limited, Frisco POB I Limited, Frisco POB II Limited, and Medland L.P. (collectively, the Sellers). The Murphy Plaintiffs assert breach of contract and common law business tort theories in pursuit of their claim for a commission in the amount of $1.34 million, as well as unspecified punitive damages. The Company denies any liability to the Murphy Plaintiffs and filed a motion for summary judgment with the court as to their claims. The Companys motion for summary judgment was partially granted as to the Murphy Plaintiffs breach of contract claims and third party beneficiary claims on April 19, 2012. The Company was served with an amended complaint in the case on or about February 28, 2012 in which Rainier Medical Investments LLC (Rainier) joined as a plaintiff. Rainier alleges breach of contract, unfair competition, and various common law business tort and equitable claims against the Company arising out of the Companys alleged exclusion of Rainier from participation as an investor in the Frisco Property acquisition. Rainier seeks compensatory and punitive damages in excess of $10 million. The Company denies any liability to Rainier and will defend the claims vigorously. A trial date is expected in late 2012.
The Company is, from time to time, involved in litigation arising out of the ordinary course of business or which is expected to be covered by insurance. The Company is not aware of any other pending or threatened litigation that, if resolved against the Company, would have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Note 7. Stockholders Equity
The following table provides a reconciliation of total equity for the three months ended March 31, 2012:
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
Common Stock |
Additional Paid-In Capital |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
Cumulative Net Income |
Cumulative Dividends |
Total Stockholders Equity |
||||||||||||||||||
Balance at Dec. 31, 2011 |
$ | 779 | $ | 1,894,604 | $ | (3,332 | ) | $ | 795,951 | $ | (1,683,196 | ) | $ | 1,004,806 | ||||||||||
Issuance of common stock |
1 | 286 | | | | 287 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common stock redemption |
| (45 | ) | | | | (45 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| 932 | | | | 932 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 3,134 | | 3,134 | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends to common stockholders ($0.30 per share) |
| | | | (23,387 | ) | (23,387 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2012 |
$ | 780 | $ | 1,895,777 | $ | (3,332 | ) | $ | 799,085 | $ | (1,706,583 | ) | $ | 985,727 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-Continued
Common Stock
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending common stock outstanding for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011:
Three Months Ended | Year Ended | |||||||
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
77,843,883 | 66,071,424 | ||||||
Issuance of common stock |
16,926 | 11,681,392 | ||||||
Restricted stock-based awards, net of forfeitures |
100,883 | 91,067 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance, end of period |
77,961,692 | 77,843,883 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
At-The-Market Equity Offering Program
Since December 2008, the Company has had in place an at-the-market equity offering program to sell shares of its common stock from time to time in at-the-market sales transactions. The Company has not sold any shares under this program since July 2011 and had 2,791,300 authorized shares remaining to be sold under the current sales agreement at March 31, 2012.
Common Stock Dividends
During the first three months of 2012, the Company declared and paid a common stock dividend of $0.30 per share.
On May 1, 2012, the Company declared a quarterly common stock dividend in the amount of $0.30 per share payable on June 1, 2012 to stockholders of record on May 17, 2012.
21
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-Continued
Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding |
||||||||
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding |
77,945,505 | 67,591,152 | ||||||
Unvested restricted stock |
(1,518,796 | ) | (1,439,726 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Weighted average Common Shares OutstandingBasic |
76,426,709 | 66,151,426 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Weighted average Common SharesBasic |
76,426,709 | 66,151,426 | ||||||
Dilutive effect of restricted stock |
1,087,873 | | ||||||
Dilutive effect of employee stock purchase plan |
126,460 | | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Weighted average Common Shares OutstandingDiluted |
77,641,042 | 66,151,426 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income (loss) |
||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
$ | 1,903 | $ | (6,243 | ) | |||
Noncontrolling interests share in net income |
| (27 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders |
1,903 | (6,270 | ) | |||||
Discontinued operations |
1,231 | 481 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders |
$ | 3,134 | $ | (5,789 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share |
||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
$ | 0.02 | $ | (0.09 | ) | |||
Discontinued operations |
0.02 | 0.00 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders |
$ | 0.04 | $ | (0.09 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share |
||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
$ | 0.02 | $ | (0.09 | ) | |||
Discontinued operations |
0.02 | 0.00 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders |
$ | 0.04 | $ | (0.09 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
The dilutive effect of restricted stock totaling 1,023,174 shares and options under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan to purchase the Companys stock totaling 89,917 shares was excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per common share for the three months ended March 31, 2011 because the effect was anti-dilutive due to the net loss from continuing operations incurred during that period.
Incentive Plans
The Company has various stock-based incentive plans for its employees and directors. Awards under these plans include restricted stock issued to employees and the Companys directors and options granted to employees pursuant to its Employee Stock Purchase Plan. During the first three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company issued 103,225 and 79,169 shares of restricted common stock, respectively, to its employees under its stock-based incentive plans and withheld 2,342 shares and 2,568 shares of common stock, respectively, from its officers to pay estimated withholding taxes related to restricted stock that vested, respectively.
22
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-Continued
A summary of the activity under the incentive plans for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 is included in the table below.
Three Months Ended March 31, |
||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Stock-based awards, beginning of period |
1,430,675 | 1,379,243 | ||||||
Granted |
103,225 | 79,169 | ||||||
Vested |
(15,388 | ) | (10,675 | ) | ||||
Forfeited |
| (10,926 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Stock-based awards, end of period |
1,518,512 | 1,436,811 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
Under the Companys Employee Stock Purchase Plan, in January of each year, each eligible employee is granted an option to purchase up to $25,000 of Common Stock at the lesser of 85% of the market price on the date of grant or 85% of the market price on the date of exercise of such option. The number of shares subject to each years option becomes fixed on the date of grant. Options granted under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan expire if not exercised within 27 months after each such options date of grant. The Company recorded approximately $0.2 million in general and administrative expenses during the first quarter of 2012 relating to the annual grant of options to its employees under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. On April 1, 2012, options to purchase 182,315 shares of Common Stock expired that had not been exercised.
A summary of the activity under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 is included in the table below.
Three Months Ended March 31, |
||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Outstanding and exercisable, beginning of period |
425,196 | 392,517 | ||||||
Granted |
327,936 | 261,960 | ||||||
Exercised |
(12,581 | ) | (4,591 | ) | ||||
Forfeited |
(28,166 | ) | (23,406 | ) | ||||
Expired |
| | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Outstanding and exercisable, end of period |
712,385 | 626,480 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
Note 8. Defined Benefit Pension Plans
The Companys Executive Retirement Plan provides benefits upon retirement for three of the Companys founding officers. The plan is unfunded and benefits will be paid from cash flows of the Company. The maximum annual benefits payable to each individual under the Executive Retirement Plan is $896,000, subject to cost-of-living adjustments. As of March 31, 2012, only the Companys Chief Executive Officer was eligible to retire under the Executive Retirement Plan.
Net periodic benefit cost recorded related to the Companys pension plans for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 is detailed in the following table.
Three Months Ended March 31, |
||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Service costs |
$ | 19 | $ | 17 | ||||
Interest costs |
181 | 214 | ||||||
Amortization of net gain/loss |
248 | 232 | ||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
(181 | ) | | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 267 | $ | 463 | ||||
|
|
|
|
23
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-Continued
Note 9. Other Operating Income
Other operating income on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations generally includes lease guaranty revenue recognized under its property operating agreements, interest income on notes receivable, and other items as detailed in the table below.
Three Months Ended March 31, |
||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Property operating agreement guaranty revenue |
$ | 1,243 | $ | 1,975 | ||||
Interest income on notes receivable |
142 | 240 | ||||||
Management fee income |
42 | 38 | ||||||
Other |
347 | 49 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 1,774 | $ | 2,302 | |||||
|
|
|
|
Note 10. Taxable Income (Loss)
Taxable Income (Loss)
The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT, as defined under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it distribute at least 90% of its annual taxable income to its stockholders.
As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income it distributes currently to its stockholders. Accordingly, no provision for federal income taxes has been made in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT for any taxable year, then it will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent taxable years. Even if the Company qualifies as a REIT, it may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property and to federal income and excise tax on its undistributed taxable income.
Earnings and profits, the current and accumulated amounts of which determine the taxability of distributions to stockholders, vary from net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders and taxable income (loss) because of different depreciation recovery periods and methods, and other items.
The following table reconciles the Companys consolidated net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders to taxable income (loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.
Three Months Ended March 31, |
||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders |
$ | 3,134 | $ | (5,789 | ) | |||
Reconciling items to taxable income: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
6,943 | 5,325 | ||||||
Gain or loss on disposition of depreciable assets |
(5,608 | ) | (2,176 | ) | ||||
Straight-line rent |
(1,810 | ) | (1,140 | ) | ||||
Receivable allowances |
(480 | ) | 396 | |||||
Stock-based compensation |
1,189 | 1,386 | ||||||
Other |
5,259 | 1,089 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Taxable income (loss) (1) |
$ | 8,627 | $ | (909 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Dividends paid |
$ | 23,387 | $ | 20,245 | ||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Before REIT dividends paid deduction. |
24
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-Continued
State Income Taxes
State income tax expense and payments for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 are detailed in the table below.
Three Months Ended March 31, |
||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
State income tax expense: |
||||||||
Texas gross margins tax |
$ | 142 | $ | 119 | ||||
Other |
(70 | ) | 44 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total state income tax expense |
$ | 72 | $ | 163 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
State income tax payments, net |
$ | 24 | $ | 23 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The Texas gross margins tax is a tax on gross receipts from operations in Texas. The Company understands that the Securities and Exchange Commission views this tax as an income tax. As such, the Company has disclosed the Texas gross margin tax in the table above.
Note 11. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, receivables and payables are reasonable estimates of their fair value as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 due to their short-term nature. The fair value of notes and bonds payable is estimated using cash flow analyses, based on the Companys current interest rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. The fair value of mortgage notes and notes receivable is estimated either based on cash flow analyses at an assumed market rate of interest or at a rate consistent with the rates on mortgage notes acquired by the Company recently or notes receivable entered into by the Company recently. The table below details the fair value and carrying values for notes and bonds payable, mortgage notes receivable and notes receivable at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Fair | Carrying | Fair | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
value | value | value | value | ||||||||||||
Notes and bonds payable |
$ | 1,418.6 | $ | 1,545.8 | $ | 1,393.5 | $ | 1,534.3 | ||||||||
Mortgage notes receivable |
$ | 112.8 | $ | 112.2 | $ | 97.4 | $ | 95.5 | ||||||||
Notes receivable, net of allowances |
$ | 0.3 | $ | 0.3 | $ | 0.3 | $ | 0.3 |
25
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This report and other materials the Company has filed or may file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as information included in oral statements or other written statements made, or to be made, by senior management of the Company, contain, or will contain, disclosures that are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include all statements that do not relate solely to historical or current facts and can be identified by the use of words such as may, will, expect, believe, anticipate, target, intend, plan, estimate, project, continue, should, could and other comparable terms. These forward-looking statements are based on the current plans and expectations of management and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including the risks, as described in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 that could significantly affect the Companys current plans and expectations and future financial condition and results.
The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Stockholders and investors are cautioned not to unduly rely on such forward-looking statements when evaluating the information presented in the Companys filings and reports, including, without limitation, estimates and projections regarding the performance of development projects the Company is pursuing.
For a detailed discussion of the Companys risk factors, please refer to the Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Business Overview
Healthcare Realtys strategy is to own and operate medical office and other medical-related facilities that produce stable and growing rental income. Additionally, the Company provides a broad spectrum of services to develop, lease, finance and manage its portfolio of healthcare properties. The Company focuses its portfolio on outpatient-related facilities located on or near the campuses of large acute care hospitals and associated with leading health systems because management views these facilities as stable, lower-risk real estate investments. The Companys diversity of geography and tenants, which comprises nearly two-dozen physician specialties, as well as surgery, imaging, and diagnostic centers, helps mitigate exposure to credit risk, changes in tenant clinical practice, reimbursement levels, and fluctuating economic conditions.
Substantially all of the Companys revenues are derived from operating leases on its real estate properties and interest earned on outstanding notes receivable. These sources of revenue represent the Companys primary source of liquidity to fund its dividends and its operating expenses, including interest incurred on debt, general and administrative costs such as compensation and office rent, as well as other expenses incurred in connection with managing its existing portfolio and acquiring additional properties. To the extent additional investments are not funded by these sources, the Company will fund its investment activity generally through equity or debt issuances either in the public or private markets, proceeds from asset dispositions or through proceeds from its unsecured credit facility due 2015 (the Unsecured Credit Facility).
Executive Overview
During the first quarter of 2012, the Company acquired $22.4 million in real estate properties, funded $3.5 million related to its construction projects, and funded $12.6 million in existing mortgage notes. The Company also sold five real estate properties in which the Company had a $10.8 million net investment, generating cash proceeds of approximately $6.6 million and $7.5 million of seller-financed notes.
The Company remains focused on leasing its development properties and expects leasing momentum on these properties to continue based on increased activity in recent periods. The Company also expects that the net proceeds received from the sale of assets will be used to fund obligations on these development properties.
At March 31, 2012, the Companys leverage ratio [debt divided by (debt plus stockholders equity less intangible assets plus accumulated depreciation)] was approximately 48.3%, and its borrowings outstanding under the Unsecured Credit Facility totaled $238.0 million, with a capacity remaining under its financial covenants of approximately $462.0 million.
26
Trends and Matters Impacting Operating Results
Management monitors factors and trends important to the Company and the REIT industry in order to gauge the potential impact on the operations of the Company. In addition to the matters discussed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, below are some of the factors and trends that management believes may impact future operations of the Company.
Acquisitions
During the first quarter of 2012, the Company acquired approximately $22.4 million in real estate assets. These acquisitions were funded with borrowings on the Unsecured Credit Facility and proceeds from real estate dispositions. See Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on these acquisitions.
Development Activity
The Company had several development projects ongoing at March 31, 2012, including one construction project, three construction mortgage notes and 11 properties in the process of stabilization subsequent to construction. See Note 6 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for more detail on these projects.
The Companys ability to complete and stabilize these facilities in a given period of time will impact the Companys results of operations and cash flows. More favorable completion dates, stabilization periods and rental rates will result in improved results of operations and cash flows, while lagging completion dates, stabilization dates, and rental rates will result in less favorable results of operations and cash flows.
Beyond the current commitments, the Company has no new development starts planned. However, the Company is regularly in discussions with health systems, developers and others that could lead to attractive development opportunities. The Company will consider these projects in light of existing obligations, the acquisition environment, capital availability and cost, and other factors.
Dispositions
During the first quarter of 2012, the Company disposed of five medical office buildings in which the Company had an aggregate net investment of approximately $10.8 million. Net cash proceeds from these dispositions were used to repay amounts due under the Unsecured Credit Facility, to fund additional real estate investments, and for general corporate purposes. See Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on these dispositions.
Subsequent Dispositions
In April 2012, the Company disposed of five medical office buildings located in Florida for a purchase price of $33.3 million in which the Company had a net aggregate investment of approximately $31.8 million. The Company received approximately $32.4 million in cash consideration from the sale, including the origination of a $3.8 million seller-financed mortgage note and a $0.6 million contingent liability. The Company expects to recognize an immaterial impairment charge in the second quarter of 2012 from the sale. These properties were not classified as held for sale at March 31, 2012.
In April 2012, the Company disposed of a medical office building in Tennessee, included in held for sale at March 31, 2012, in which the Company had a net investment of approximately $0.8 million. The Company received approximately $0.9 million in net cash proceeds and expects to recognize a gain of approximately $0.1 million in the second quarter of 2012.
27
The Company expects to redeploy cash from other property sales and mortgage repayments into new investments. To the extent revenues related to these property sales or mortgage repayments exceed revenues from these new investments, the Companys results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected.
At-The-Market Equity Offering Program
Since December 2008, the Company has had in place an at-the-market equity offering program to sell shares of its common stock from time to time in at-the-market sales transactions. The Company has not sold any shares under this program since July 2011 and had 2,791,300 authorized shares remaining to be sold under the current sales agreement at March 31, 2012.
Expiring Leases
Overall, the Company expects approximately 15%-20% of the leases in its multi-tenanted portfolio will expire each year. During 2012, 369 of the leases in the Companys multi-tenant buildings are scheduled to expire. Approximately 85% of the leases expiring in 2012 are located in buildings on hospital campuses, are distributed throughout the portfolio and are not concentrated with any one tenant, health system or location. Of the 71 leases that had expired as of March 31, 2012, nearly all of the tenants had renewed, had expressed an intention to renew, or continued to occupy their leased space in a holdover lease arrangement.
The leases on three single tenant properties are scheduled to expire during 2012. A lease was signed on a 110,000 square foot property extending the maturity until July 2013. The Company expects a new lease will also be signed on a 12,000 square foot property extending the expiration of the lease for an additional eighteen months at the same lease rate. Negotiations are on-going relating to the renewal of a 13,500 square foot property with a lease expiration in July 2012.
Other Items Impacting Operations
Several events that occurred in the first quarter of 2012 or are expected to occur in the second quarter of 2012 that may impact the Companys operations and financial results:
| First quarter of 2012 results included partially reserved revenue that was recovered through a settlement with a former tenant resulting in an increase to net income of approximately $0.2 million. |
| In April 2012, the Company disposed of five medical office buildings located in Florida for a purchase price of $33.3 million in which the Company had a net aggregate investment of approximately $31.8 million. The Company received approximately $32.4 million in cash consideration from the sale, including the origination of a $3.8 million seller-financed mortgage note and a $0.6 million contingent liability. The sale of these properties will reduce property operating income by approximately $0.9 million per quarter and property operating expense by approximately $0.4 million per quarter. |
Funds from Operations
Funds from operations (FFO) and FFO per share are operating performance measures adopted by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. (NAREIT). NAREIT defines FFO as the most commonly accepted and reported measure of a REITs operating performance equal to net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. The SEC indicated in 2003 that impairment charges (losses) could not be added back to net income attributable to common stockholders in calculating FFO. However, in late October 2011, NAREIT issued an alert indicating that the SEC staff recently advised NAREIT that it currently takes no position on the matter of whether impairment charges should be added back to net income to compute FFO, and NAREIT affirmed its original definition of FFO. In 2012, the Company is following the NAREIT definition to exclude impairment charges and has restated all prior periods to exclude impairment charges in calculating FFO and FFO per share to agree with the current presentation.
28
Management believes FFO and FFO per share to be supplemental measures of a REITs performance because they provide an understanding of the operating performance of the Companys properties without giving effect to certain significant non-cash items, primarily depreciation and amortization expense. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. However, real estate values instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions. The Company believes that by excluding the effect of depreciation, amortization and gains or losses from sales of real estate, all of which are based on historical costs and which may be of limited relevance in evaluating current performance, FFO and FFO per share can facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods. The Company reports FFO and FFO per share because these measures are observed by management to also be the predominant measures used by the REIT industry and by industry analysts to evaluate REITs and because FFO per share is consistently reported, discussed, and compared by research analysts in their notes and publications about REITs. For these reasons, management has deemed it appropriate to disclose and discuss FFO and FFO per share. However, FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP and is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs. FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income attributable to common stockholders as an indicator of the Companys operating performance or as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities as a measure of liquidity.
The comparability of FFO for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to 2011 was affected by the various acquisitions and dispositions of the Companys real estate portfolio and the results of operations of the portfolio from period to period. Other items that impacted the comparability of FFO are discussed below:
| decreased interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 of approximately $3.9 million, or $0.05 per diluted common share, due primarily to the redemption of the senior notes due 2011 (the Senior Notes due 2011) in the first quarter of 2011; |
| loss on the extinguishment of debt of approximately $2.0 million, or $0.03 per diluted common share, recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2011 from the redemption of the Senior Notes due 2011; and |
| a lease termination fee received in the first quarter of 2012 totaling $1.5 million, or $0.02 per diluted common share, in connection with a property sale. |
The table below reconciles FFO to net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Stockholders |
$ | 3,134 | $ | (5,789 | ) | |||
Gain on sales of real estate properties |
(3,428 | ) | (36 | ) | ||||
Impairments |
4,170 | 147 | ||||||
Real estate depreciation and amortization |
23,428 | 20,054 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total adjustments |
24,170 | 20,165 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Funds from Operations |
$ | 27,304 | $ | 14,376 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Funds from Operations per Common ShareBasic |
$ | 0.36 | $ | 0.22 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Funds from Operations per Common ShareDiluted |
$ | 0.35 | $ | 0.21 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Weighted Average Common Shares OutstandingBasic |
76,426,709 | 66,151,426 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Weighted Average Common Shares OutstandingDiluted |
77,641,042 | 67,264,517 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
29
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
The Companys results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 were significantly impacted by acquisitions, dispositions and impairments of properties, as well as lower interest expense.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
March 31, | Change | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
2012 | 2011 | $ | % | ||||||||||||
REVENUES |
||||||||||||||||
Property operating |
$ | 59,456 | $ | 52,285 | $ | 7,171 | 13.7 | % | ||||||||
Single-tenant net lease |
12,669 | 14,440 | (1,771 | ) | -12.3 | % | ||||||||||
Straight-line rent |
1,900 | 1,328 | 572 | 43.1 | % | |||||||||||
Mortgage interest |
2,292 | 1,649 | 643 | 39.0 | % | |||||||||||
Other operating |
1,774 | 2,302 | (528 | ) | -22.9 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
78,091 | 72,004 | 6,087 | 8.5 | % | ||||||||||||
EXPENSES |
||||||||||||||||
Property operating |
28,965 | 27,840 | 1,125 | 4.0 | % | |||||||||||
General and administrative |
5,265 | 5,781 | (516 | ) | -8.9 | % | ||||||||||
Depreciation |
21,388 | 18,631 | 2,757 | 14.8 | % | |||||||||||
Amortization |
2,537 | 1,778 | 759 | 42.7 | % | |||||||||||
Bad debt, net |
(41 | ) | 180 | (221 | ) | -122.8 | % | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
58,114 | 54,210 | 3,904 | 7.2 | % | ||||||||||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) |
||||||||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| (1,986 | ) | (1,986 | ) | -100.0 | % | |||||||||
Interest expense |
(18,379 | ) | (22,274 | ) | (3,895 | ) | -17.5 | % | ||||||||
Interest and other income, net |
305 | 223 | (82 | ) | -36.8 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
(18,074 | ) | (24,037 | ) | (5,963 | ) | -24.8 | % | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
1,903 | (6,243 | ) | 8,146 | 130.5 | % | ||||||||||
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
||||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
1,973 | 592 | 1,381 | 233.3 | % | |||||||||||
Impairments |
(4,170 | ) | (147 | ) | (4,023 | ) | 2736.7 | % | ||||||||
Gain on sales of real estate properties |
3,428 | 36 | 3,392 | 9422.2 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
1,231 | 481 | 750 | 155.9 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
3,134 | (5,762 | ) | 8,896 | 154.4 | % | ||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| (27 | ) | 27 | -100.0 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS |
$ | 3,134 | $ | (5,789 | ) | $ | 8,923 | 154.1 | % | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholdersBasic |
$ | 0.04 | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.13 | 144.4 | % | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholdersDiluted |
$ | 0.04 | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.13 | 144.4 | % | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
Total revenues from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 increased $6.1 million, or 8.5%, compared to the same period in 2011, mainly for the reasons discussed below:
Property operating income increased mainly due to the recognition of additional revenue of approximately $4.1 million from the Companys 2011 and 2012 real estate acquisitions and approximately $0.8 million from properties that were previously under construction that commenced operations during 2011 and 2012. Also, the Company began recognizing the underlying tenant rental income on properties whose single-tenant net leases had expired, resulting in approximately $0.6 million in additional income in 2012 compared to 2011. The remainder of the increase of approximately $1.7 million was mainly the result of new leasing activity and annual rent increases.
Single-tenant net lease revenues decreased approximately $0.5 million due to the expiration in 2011 of an agreement with one operator which provided the Company replacement rent and approximately $1.9 million relating to the expiration of seven single-tenant net leases in 2011. These decreases are partially offset by additional revenue from the Companys 2012 real estate acquisition of approximately $0.2 million, as well as annual contractual rent increases of approximately $0.4 million.
Straight-line rent increased mainly due to new leases subject to straight-lining on properties acquired in 2011 and 2012, as well as lease renewals.
Mortgage interest increased mainly due to the interest earned from new mortgage notes of approximately $0.8 million and from additional fundings on existing mortgage notes of approximately $0.1 million. These amounts are partially offset by repayments of approximately $0.3 million.
Other operating income decreased mainly due to the expiration of lease guaranty support payments related to two properties in New Orleans totaling approximately $0.5 million.
Total expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2012 increased $3.9 million, or 7.2%, compared to the same period in 2011, mainly for the reasons discussed below:
Property operating expense increased mainly due to the recognition of additional expenses totaling approximately $1.4 million from the Companys 2011 and 2012 real estate acquisitions and $0.8 million from properties that were previously under construction that commenced operations during 2011 and 2012. Also, the Company began recognizing the underlying tenant rental expense on properties whose single-tenant leases had expired, resulting in approximately $0.2 million in additional expense in 2012 compared to 2011. These increases were partially offset by an overall decrease in real estate taxes of approximately $1.0 million and utilities of approximately $0.4 million.
General and administrative expenses decreased mainly due to a decrease in compensation costs of approximately $0.3 million and project costs of approximately $0.2 million.
Depreciation expense increased mainly due to approximately $1.3 million in additional depreciation recognized related to the Companys 2011 and 2012 real estate acquisitions and $0.7 million related to properties previously under construction that commenced operations during 2011. The remaining $0.8 million increase was due mainly to additional depreciation expense recognized related to various building and tenant improvement expenditures.
Amortization expense increased mainly due to lease intangibles of properties acquired in 2011 and 2012.
Other income (expense) for the three months ended March 31, 2012 changed favorably by $6.0 million, or 24.8%, compared to the same period in 2011 due to a decrease in interest expense relating mainly to the redemption of the Senior Notes due 2011 in the first quarter of 2011, partially offset by additional interest in the first quarter of 2012 due to a higher weighted average principal balance on the Unsecured Credit Facility.
Income from discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 totaled $1.2 million compared to $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011. These amounts include the results of operations, a lease termination fee, impairments and gains on sale related to assets classified as held for sale or disposed of as of March 31, 2012.
31
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources and Uses of Cash
The Companys primary sources of cash include rent and interest receipts from its real estate and mortgage portfolio based on contractual arrangements with its tenants, sponsors, and borrowers, borrowings under its Unsecured Credit Facility, proceeds from the sales of real estate properties or the repayments of mortgage notes receivable or proceeds from public or private debt or equity offerings. The Companys primary uses of cash include dividend distributions, debt service payments, including principal and interest, real estate investments, including acquisitions and construction advances, as well as property operating and general and administrative expenses. Dividends paid during the first quarter of 2012 totaling approximately $23.4 million were funded from cash flows from operations and from the Companys Unsecured Credit Facility as cash flows from operations were not adequate to fully fund the dividend. The Company expects that its cash flows from operations for the full year 2012 will be adequate to fund dividends at the current rate. Sources and uses of cash are detailed in the table below, as well as in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Three Months Ended | Change | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
March 31, 2012 |
March 31, 2011 |
$ | % | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
$ | 4,738 | $ | 113,321 | $ | (108,583 | ) | -95.8 | % | |||||||
Cash provided by operating activities |
10,937 | 9,674 | 1,263 | 13.1 | % | |||||||||||
Cash used in investing activities |
(10,698 | ) | (70,524 | ) | 59,826 | -84.8 | % | |||||||||
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
1,633 | (49,464 | ) | 51,097 | -103.3 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 6,610 | $ | 3,007 | $ | 3,603 | 119.8 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
Cash flows provided by operating activities remained fairly consistent for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 with a slight increase from $9.7 million in 2011 to $10.9 million in 2012. Several items impact cash flows from operations including, but not limited to, cash generated from property operations, interest payments and the timing related to the payment of invoices.
Investing Activities
Cash flows used in investing activities decreased during the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 primarily due to proceeds received from the mortgage repayment by a consolidated variable interest entity and repayments of mortgage notes receivable.
Financing Activities
Cash flows provided by financing activities increased during the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 primarily due to the redemption of the Senior Notes due 2011 in the prior period.
Contractual Obligations
The Company monitors its contractual obligations to manage the availability of funds necessary to meet obligations when due. The following table represents the Companys long-term contractual obligations for which the Company was making payments at March 31, 2012, including interest payments due where applicable. The Company is also required to pay dividends to its stockholders at least equal to 90% of its taxable income in order to maintain its qualification as a real estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Companys material contractual obligations for the remainder of 2012 through 2013 are included in the table below. At March 31, 2012, the Company had no purchase or long-term capital lease obligations.
32
(Dollars in thousands) |
Remainder of 2012 |
2013 | Total | |||||||||
Long-term debt obligations, including interest (1) |
$ | 49,144 | $ | 89,049 | $ | 138,193 | ||||||
Operating lease commitments (2) |
2,533 | 4,383 | 6,916 | |||||||||
Construction in progress (3) |
4,581 | | 4,581 | |||||||||
Tenant improvements (4) |
| | | |||||||||
Construction mortgage note obligations (5) |
66,975 | 85,438 | 152,413 | |||||||||
Pension obligations (6) |
| | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total contractual obligations |
$ | 123,233 | $ | 178,870 | $ | 302,103 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Includes estimated interest due on total debt other than on the Unsecured Credit Facility. Note 4 to the Companys Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements provides more detail on the Companys notes and bonds payable. |
(2) | Includes primarily the corporate office lease and ground leases related to various properties for which the Company is currently making payments. |
(3) | The table above includes cash flow projections for the remainder of 2012 and 2013 related to the construction of one building currently in construction in progress but does not include budgeted amounts on those projects that are designated for tenant improvements which the Company is not obligated to fund until tenant leases are executed. |
(4) | The Company has various first-generation tenant improvement budgeted amounts remaining as of March 31, 2012 of approximately $40.2 million related to properties developed by the Company that the Company may fund for tenant improvements as leases are signed. The Company cannot predict when or if these amounts will be expended and, therefore, has not included estimated fundings in the table above. |
(5) | The Companys remaining funding commitment as of March 31, 2012 on three construction mortgage notes. |
(6) | At December 31, 2011, the last measurement date, one employee, the Companys chief executive officer, was eligible to retire under the Executive Retirement Plan. If the chief executive officer retired and received full retirement benefits based upon the terms of the plan, the future benefits to be paid are estimated to be approximately $29.0 million as of December 31, 2011. However, because the Companys chief executive officer has no present intention to retire, the Company has not projected when the retirement benefits would be paid to the officer in this table. At March 31, 2012, the Company had recorded a $15.7 million liability, included in other liabilities, related to its pension plan obligations. |
As of March 31, 2012, the Companys leverage ratio [debt divided by (debt plus stockholders equity less intangible assets plus accumulated depreciation)] was approximately 48.3%. The Companys fixed charge ratio, calculated in accordance with Item 503 of Regulation S-K, includes only income from continuing operations which is reduced by depreciation and amortization and the operating results of properties currently classified as held for sale, as well as other income from discontinued operations. In accordance with this definition, the Companys earnings from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 covered its fixed charges with a ratio of 1.00 to 1.00. The Companys earnings calculated in accordance with its fixed charge covenant ratio under its Unsecured Credit Facility, which is based on a rolling four quarter calculation, covered its fixed charges by 2.3 times.
The Companys various debt agreements contain certain representations, warranties, and financial and other covenants customary in such debt agreements. Among other things, these provisions require the Company to maintain certain financial ratios and minimum tangible net worth and impose certain limits on the Companys ability to incur indebtedness and create liens or encumbrances. At March 31, 2012, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenant provisions under all of its various debt instruments.
Security Deposits and Letters of Credit
As of March 31, 2012, the Company had approximately $6.5 million in letters of credit, security deposits, or capital replacement reserves for the benefit of the Company in the event the obligated lessee or operator fails to make payments under the terms of their respective lease. Generally, the Company may, at its discretion and upon notification to the operator or tenant, draw upon these instruments if there are any defaults under the leases.
Development Activity
The Company had several development projects ongoing at March 31, 2012, including one construction project, three construction mortgage notes and eleven properties in the process of stabilization subsequent to construction. See Note 6 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for more detail on these projects. A summary of these development projects is detailed in the following table.
33
(Dollars in thousands) |
Number of Properties |
Funded During Three Months Ended Mar. 31, 2012 |
Total Amount Funded Through Mar. 31, 2012 |
Estimated Remaining Fundings |
Estimated Total Investment |
Approximate Square Feet |
||||||||||||||||||
Construction in progress (1) |
1 | $ | 3,094 | $ | 10,864 | $ | 7,221 | $ | 18,085 | 96,433 | ||||||||||||||
Mortgage construction notes |
3 | 12,642 | 62,645 | 152,413 | 215,058 | 462,712 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stabilization in progress (1) |
11 | 8,779 | 368,491 | 23,409 | 391,900 | 1,185,863 | ||||||||||||||||||
Land held for development |
| (5 | ) | 25,171 | | | | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
15 | $ | 24,510 | $ | 467,171 | $ | 183,043 | $ | 625,043 | 1,745,008 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | The estimated total investment for each development property includes estimated tenant improvement allowances but does not include any estimate of excess tenant improvement cost financing by the Company. To the extent actual amounts funded for each development property reflect excess tenant improvement costs financed by the Company, the estimated remaining fundings could be greater than the amount shown in the table above. |
The Company intends to fund these commitments with available cash on hand, cash flows from operations, proceeds from the Unsecured Credit Facility, proceeds from the sale of real estate properties, or proceeds from repayments of mortgage notes receivable.
Subsequent Dispositions
In April 2012, the Company disposed of five medical office buildings located in Florida for a purchase price of $33.3 million in which the Company had a net aggregate investment of approximately $31.8 million. The Company received approximately $32.4 million in cash consideration from the sale, including the origination of a $3.8 million seller-financed mortgage note and a $0.6 million contingent liability. The Company expects to recognize an immaterial impairment charge in the second quarter of 2012 from the sale. These properties were not classified as held for sale at March 31, 2012.
In April 2012, the Company disposed of a medical office building in Tennessee, included in held for sale at March 31, 2012, in which the Company had a net investment of approximately $0.8 million. The Company received approximately $0.9 million in net cash proceeds and expects to recognize a gain of approximately $0.1 million in the second quarter of 2012.
Proceeds received from these dispositions are expected to be used to fund additional investments, repay amounts outstanding under the Companys Unsecured Credit Facility, or for general corporate purposes.
At-The-Market Equity Offering Program
Since December 2008, the Company has had in place an at-the-market equity offering program to sell shares of its common stock from time to time in at-the-market sales transactions. The Company has not sold any shares under this program since July 2011 and had 2,791,300 authorized shares remaining to be sold under the current sales agreement at March 31, 2012.
Dividends
The Company paid a quarterly dividend during the first three months of 2012 of $0.30 per share. On May 1, 2012, the Companys Board of Directors declared a common stock cash dividend for the three months ended March 31, 2012 of $0.30 per share, payable on June 1, 2012 to shareholders of record on May 17, 2012. As described in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 under the heading Risk Factors, the ability of the Company to pay dividends is dependent upon its ability to generate funds from operations and cash flows and to make accretive new investments.
34
Liquidity
Net cash provided by operating activities was $10.9 million and $9.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Companys cash flows are dependent upon rental rates on leases, occupancy levels of the multi-tenanted buildings, acquisition and disposition activity during the year, and the level of operating expenses, among other factors. The Companys cash flows were significantly impacted in the first quarter of 2012 compared to 2011 due to the timing of interest payments on the Senior Notes due 2017 and the Senior Notes due 2021.
The Company expects to continue to meet its liquidity needs, including funding additional investments, paying dividends, and funding debt service through cash on hand, cash flows from operations, borrowings under the Unsecured Credit Facility, proceeds from sales of real estate investments, proceeds from mortgage note repayments, or additional capital market financings, including the Companys at-the-market equity offering program, or other debt or equity offerings. The Company also had unencumbered real estate assets with a cost of approximately $2.4 billion at March 31, 2012, of which a portion could serve as collateral for secured mortgage financing. The Company believes that its liquidity and sources of capital are adequate to satisfy its cash requirements. The Company cannot, however, be certain that these sources of funds will be available at a time and upon terms acceptable to the Company in sufficient amounts to meet its liquidity needs.
Impact of Inflation
Inflation has not significantly affected the Companys earnings due to the moderate inflation rate in recent years and the fact that most of the Companys leases and financial support arrangements require tenants and sponsors to pay all or some portion of the increases in operating expenses, thereby reducing the Companys risk of the adverse effects of inflation. In addition, inflation has the effect of increasing gross revenue the Company is to receive under the terms of certain leases and financial support arrangements. Leases and financial support arrangements vary in the remaining terms of obligations, further reducing the Companys risk of any adverse effects of inflation. Interest payable under the Unsecured Credit Facility is calculated at a variable rate; therefore, the amount of interest payable under the Unsecured Credit Facility is influenced by changes in short-term rates, which tend to be sensitive to inflation. During periods where interest rate increases outpace inflation, the Companys operating results should be negatively impacted. Conversely, when increases in inflation outpace increases in interest rates, the Companys operating results should be positively impacted.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on the Companys financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
New Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the impact of new accounting standards. The adoption of these new standards are not expected to have a material impact on the Companys results of operations or financial position.
35
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
The Company is exposed to market risk in the form of changing interest rates on its debt and mortgage notes and other notes receivable. Management uses regular monitoring of market conditions and analysis techniques to manage this risk. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, there were no material changes in the quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risks presented in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Companys management, with the participation of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
36
Two affiliates of the Company, HR Acquisition of Virginia Limited Partnership and HRT Holdings, Inc., are defendants in a lawsuit brought by Fork Union Medical Investors Limited Partnership, Goochland Medical Investors Limited Partnership, and Life Care Centers of America, Inc., as plaintiffs. The plaintiffs alleged that they overpaid rent between 1991 and 2003 under leases for two skilled nursing facilities in Virginia and sought a refund of such overpayments. Plaintiffs were seeking up to $2.0 million, plus pre- and post-judgment interest and attorneys fees. The two leases were terminated by agreement in 2003. The Company denied that it was liable to the plaintiffs and filed a motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the case. The Circuit Court of Davidson County, Tennessee granted the Companys motion for summary judgment and the case was dismissed with prejudice by order entered on July 20, 2011. On August 11, 2011, the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal with the Tennessee Court of Appeals. Briefs have been filed by all parties and the Court of Appeals has scheduled oral arguments in the case for May 23, 2012. The Company believes the trial courts dismissal of the case should be affirmed but can provide no assurance as to the outcome of the appeal.
The Company is a co-defendant in a lawsuit initially filed June 28, 2011 in the District Court of Collin County, Texas captioned James P. Murphy, JPM Realty Property Management, Inc., and Rainier Medical Investments LLC v. LandPlan Development Corp., LandPlan Medical, L.P., Frisco Surgery Center Limited, Frisco POB I Limited, Frisco POB II Limited, Medland L.P., Texas Land Management, L.L.C., Jim Williams, Jr., Reed Williams, and Healthcare Realty Trust, Inc. The original plaintiffs, James P. Murphy and JPM Realty Property Management, Inc. (the Murphy Plaintiffs) allege they are due a real estate commission arising out of the sale of certain real property in Frisco, Texas (the Frisco Property). Certain affiliates of the Company purchased the Frisco Property in December 2010 from Frisco Surgery Center Limited, Frisco POB I Limited, Frisco POB II Limited, and Medland L.P. (collectively, the Sellers). The Murphy Plaintiffs assert breach of contract and common law business tort theories in pursuit of their claim for a commission in the amount of $1.34 million, as well as unspecified punitive damages. The Company denies any liability to the Murphy Plaintiffs and filed a motion for summary judgment with the court as to their claims. The Companys motion for summary judgment was partially granted as to the Murphy Plaintiffs breach of contract claims and third party beneficiary claims on April 19, 2012. The Company was served with an amended complaint in the case on or about February 28, 2012 in which Rainier Medical Investments LLC (Rainier) joined as a plaintiff. Rainier alleges breach of contract, unfair competition, and various common law business tort and equitable claims against the Company arising out of the Companys alleged exclusion of Rainier from participation as an investor in the Frisco Property acquisition. Rainier seeks compensatory and punitive damages in excess of $10 million. The Company denies any liability to Rainier and will defend the claims vigorously. A trial date is expected in late 2012.
The Company is, from time to time, involved in litigation arising out of the ordinary course of business or which is expected to be covered by insurance. The Company is not aware of any other pending or threatened litigation that, if resolved against the Company, would have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, an investor should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, which could materially affect the Companys business, financial condition or future results. The risks, as described in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to management or that management currently deems immaterial also may materially, adversely affect the Companys business, financial condition, operating results or cash flows.
37
Exhibit |
Description | |
Exhibit 3.1 | Second Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Company (1) | |
Exhibit 3.2 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, as amended (2) | |
Exhibit 4.1 | Specimen Stock Certificate (1) | |
Exhibit 4.2 | Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 30, 2004, by the Company to HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as Trustee, (formerly Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Trustee) (3) | |
Exhibit 4.3 | Form of 5.125% Senior Note Due 2014 (3) | |
Exhibit 4.4 | Third Supplemental Indenture, dated December 4, 2009, by and between the Company and Regions Bank, as Trustee (4) | |
Exhibit 4.5 | Form of 6.50% Senior Notes due 2017 (set forth in Exhibit B to the Third Supplemental Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.2 thereto) (4) | |
Exhibit 4.6 | Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated December 13, 2010, by and between the Company and Regions Bank, as Trustee (5) | |
Exhibit 4.7 | Form of 5.750% Senior Notes due 2021 (set forth in Exhibit B to the Fourth Supplemental Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.2 thereto) (5) | |
Exhibit 11 | Statement re: Computation of per share earnings (filed herewith in Note 7 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements) | |
Exhibit 31.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) | |
Exhibit 31.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) | |
Exhibit 32 | Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith) |
(1) | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Registration No. 33-60506) previously filed pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 and hereby incorporated by reference. |
(2) | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 and hereby incorporated by reference. |
(3) | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Form 8-K filed March 29, 2004 and hereby incorporated by reference. |
(4) | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Form 8-K filed December 4, 2009 and hereby incorporated by reference. |
(5) | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Form 8-K filed December 13, 2010 and hereby incorporated by reference. |
38
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
HEALTHCARE REALTY TRUST INCORPORATED | ||||||
By: | /s/ SCOTT W. HOLMES | |||||
Scott W. Holmes Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Date: May 1, 2012
39
Exhibit Index
Exhibit |
Description | |
Exhibit 3.1 | Second Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Company (1) | |
Exhibit 3.2 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, as amended (2) | |
Exhibit 4.1 | Specimen Stock Certificate (1) | |
Exhibit 4.2 | Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 30, 2004, by the Company to HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as Trustee, (formerly Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Trustee) (3) | |
Exhibit 4.3 | Form of 5.125% Senior Note Due 2014 (3) | |
Exhibit 4.4 | Third Supplemental Indenture, dated December 4, 2009, by and between the Company and Regions Bank, as Trustee (4) | |
Exhibit 4.5 | Form of 6.50% Senior Notes due 2017 (set forth in Exhibit B to the Third Supplemental Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.2 thereto) (4) | |
Exhibit 4.6 | Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated December 13, 2010, by and between the Company and Regions Bank, as Trustee (5) | |
Exhibit 4.7 | Form of 5.750% Senior Notes due 2021 (set forth in Exhibit B to the Fourth Supplemental Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.2 thereto) (5) | |
Exhibit 11 | Statement re: Computation of per share earnings (filed herewith in Note 7 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements) | |
Exhibit 31.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) | |
Exhibit 31.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) | |
Exhibit 32 | Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith) |
(1) | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Registration No. 33-60506) previously filed pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 and hereby incorporated by reference. |
(2) | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 and hereby incorporated by reference. |
(3) | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Form 8-K filed March 29, 2004 and hereby incorporated by reference. |
(4) | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Form 8-K filed December 4, 2009 and hereby incorporated by reference. |
(5) | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Form 8-K filed December 13, 2010 and hereby incorporated by reference. |
40