e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-32590
COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
20-2652949 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation of organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
4235 Innslake Drive, Suite 200 |
|
|
Glen Allen, Virginia
|
|
23060 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(804) 934-9999
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
At October 1, 2009, there were 21,468,455 shares of the Companys common stock outstanding.
COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORM 10-Q
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements |
COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2008
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
(Audited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated) |
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
13,464 |
|
|
$ |
10,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing bank deposits |
|
|
10,534 |
|
|
|
107,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
5,300 |
|
|
|
10,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
29,298 |
|
|
|
128,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale, at fair value |
|
|
171,184 |
|
|
|
193,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
Securities held to maturity, fair value of $124,865 and $94,965, respectively |
|
|
121,023 |
|
|
|
94,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities, restricted, at cost |
|
|
8,355 |
|
|
|
3,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities |
|
|
300,562 |
|
|
|
292,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for resale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans covered by FDIC shared-loss agreement (Note 8) |
|
|
245,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans excluding covered loans |
|
|
569,452 |
|
|
|
523,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(16,211 |
) |
|
|
(6,939 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans |
|
|
798,318 |
|
|
|
516,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank premises and equipment |
|
|
37,328 |
|
|
|
24,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
6,475 |
|
|
|
6,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit intangibles, net |
|
|
17,645 |
|
|
|
17,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill (Note 5) |
|
|
13,152 |
|
|
|
37,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
1,175 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned , covered by FDIC shared-loss agreement(Note 8) |
|
|
16,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FDIC receivable for expenses incurred (Note 8) |
|
|
3,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
14,802 |
|
|
|
7,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,239,138 |
|
|
$ |
1,029,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest bearing |
|
$ |
64,338 |
|
|
$ |
59,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
963,191 |
|
|
|
746,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
1,027,529 |
|
|
|
806,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
37,000 |
|
|
|
37,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trust preferred capital notes |
|
|
4,124 |
|
|
|
4,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
23,854 |
|
|
|
16,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
1,092,538 |
|
|
$ |
865,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock (5,000,000 shares authorized, $0.01 par value) 17,680 shares
issued and outstanding |
|
|
17,680 |
|
|
|
17,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
Discount on preferred stock |
|
|
(896 |
) |
|
|
(1,031 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Warrants on preferred stock |
|
|
1,037 |
|
|
|
1,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock (50,000,000 shares authorized, $0.01 par value) 21,468,455
shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
Retired warrants on common stock |
|
|
(2,111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid in capital |
|
|
146,110 |
|
|
|
146,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
Retained (deficit) earnings |
|
|
(17,552 |
) |
|
|
1,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
2,117 |
|
|
|
(1,265 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
146,600 |
|
|
$ |
164,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,239,138 |
|
|
$ |
1,029,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements
3
COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BOE Predecessor |
|
|
TFC Predecessor |
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
For the nine months ended |
|
|
|
For the five months ended |
|
|
For the five months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
May 31, 2008 |
|
|
May 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Note 1) |
|
|
(Note 1) |
|
Interest and dividend income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans |
|
$ |
8,820 |
|
|
$ |
8,497 |
|
|
$ |
26,236 |
|
|
$ |
11,201 |
|
|
|
$ |
6,737 |
|
|
$ |
6,849 |
|
Interest and fees on FDIC covered loans |
|
|
3,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on federal funds sold |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Interest on deposits in other banks |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and dividends on securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
2,081 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
7,580 |
|
|
|
1,226 |
|
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
Nontaxable |
|
|
896 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
2,473 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
15,608 |
|
|
|
9,474 |
|
|
|
47,245 |
|
|
|
13,021 |
|
|
|
|
7,778 |
|
|
|
7,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on deposits |
|
|
6,026 |
|
|
|
2,908 |
|
|
|
18,443 |
|
|
|
3,935 |
|
|
|
|
3,265 |
|
|
|
3,295 |
|
Interest on federal funds purchased |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Interest on other borrowed funds |
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
6,366 |
|
|
|
3,286 |
|
|
|
19,520 |
|
|
|
4,406 |
|
|
|
|
3,744 |
|
|
|
3,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
9,242 |
|
|
|
6,188 |
|
|
|
27,725 |
|
|
|
8,615 |
|
|
|
|
4,033 |
|
|
|
3,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
5,231 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
11,271 |
|
|
|
1,334 |
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
1,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
4,011 |
|
|
|
5,088 |
|
|
|
16,454 |
|
|
|
7,281 |
|
|
|
|
3,833 |
|
|
|
2,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
1,863 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
Gain on SFSB transaction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on securities transactions, net |
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of other real estate |
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
24,706 |
|
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
4,840 |
|
|
|
2,375 |
|
|
|
14,294 |
|
|
|
2,949 |
|
|
|
|
2,494 |
|
|
|
3,687 |
|
Occupancy expenses |
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
1,886 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
Equipment expenses |
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
1,198 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
Legal fees |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
772 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
1,029 |
|
FDIC assessment |
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
1,310 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Data processing fees |
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
2,217 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
1,995 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
1,770 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
5,407 |
|
|
|
1,366 |
|
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
9,943 |
|
|
|
4,656 |
|
|
|
54,131 |
|
|
|
6,591 |
|
|
|
|
4,889 |
|
|
|
8,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
|
(4,658 |
) |
|
|
1,186 |
|
|
|
(12,971 |
) |
|
|
1,743 |
|
|
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(5,355 |
) |
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(1,908 |
) |
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
2,964 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(2,750 |
) |
|
$ |
952 |
|
|
$ |
(15,935 |
) |
|
$ |
1,351 |
|
|
|
$ |
(349 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,111 |
) |
Dividends accrued on preferred stock |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of discount on preferred
stock |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(3,019 |
) |
|
$ |
952 |
|
|
$ |
(16,731 |
) |
|
$ |
1,351 |
|
|
|
$ |
(349 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share basic |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
(0.78 |
) |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.29 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share diluted |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
(0.78 |
) |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.29 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
basic |
|
|
21,468 |
|
|
|
21,469 |
|
|
|
21,468 |
|
|
|
14,750 |
|
|
|
|
1,214 |
|
|
|
4,596 |
|
diluted |
|
|
21,468 |
|
|
|
21,486 |
|
|
|
21,468 |
|
|
|
16,197 |
|
|
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
4,596 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements
4
COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BOE Predecessor |
|
|
TFC Predecessor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the five months |
|
|
For the five |
|
|
|
For the nine months ended |
|
|
|
ended |
|
|
months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
May 31, 2008 |
|
|
May 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Note 1) |
|
|
(Note 1) |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(15,935 |
) |
|
$ |
1,351 |
|
|
|
$ |
(349 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,111 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and intangibles amortization |
|
|
3,130 |
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
11,271 |
|
|
|
1,334 |
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
1,348 |
|
Amortization of security premiums and accretion of discounts, net |
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Change in loans held for sale |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net gain on SFSB transaction |
|
|
(21,260 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill |
|
|
24,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179 |
|
Net gain on sale of securities |
|
|
(905 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net loss on sale of OREO |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss/(gain) on sale of loans |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loss on write down of LLC membership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash acquired in acquisitions |
|
|
35,662 |
|
|
|
10,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase)/decrease in other assets |
|
|
(636 |
) |
|
|
(3,108 |
) |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
Increase/(decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
(3,190 |
) |
|
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
2,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
37,588 |
|
|
|
7,913 |
|
|
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
(470 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from securities |
|
|
145,148 |
|
|
|
65,131 |
|
|
|
|
2,320 |
|
|
|
12,605 |
|
Purchase of securities |
|
|
(129,390 |
) |
|
|
(23,489 |
) |
|
|
|
(3,844 |
) |
|
|
(7,200 |
) |
Net increase in loans |
|
|
(14,723 |
) |
|
|
(28,641 |
) |
|
|
|
(11,834 |
) |
|
|
(37,357 |
) |
Purchase of premises and equipment, net |
|
|
(9,421 |
) |
|
|
(989 |
) |
|
|
|
(459 |
) |
|
|
(259 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(8,386 |
) |
|
|
12,012 |
|
|
|
|
(13,817 |
) |
|
|
(32,211 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase/(decrease) in noninterest bearing and interest bearing deposits |
|
|
(85,816 |
) |
|
|
(5,693 |
) |
|
|
|
11,789 |
|
|
|
28,536 |
|
Net increase/(decrease) in federal funds purchased |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(1,095 |
) |
|
|
|
1,965 |
|
|
|
5,218 |
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid to shareholders for converted shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,843 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid to reduce FHLB borrowings |
|
|
(37,900 |
) |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid to redeem shares related to asserted appraisal rights and retire warrants |
|
|
(2,077 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(2,575 |
) |
|
|
(861 |
) |
|
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
(1,152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(128,337 |
) |
|
|
1,497 |
|
|
|
|
14,431 |
|
|
|
32,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(99,135 |
) |
|
|
21,422 |
|
|
|
|
1,684 |
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period |
|
|
128,433 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
4,100 |
|
|
|
4,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period |
|
$ |
29,298 |
|
|
$ |
21,584 |
|
|
|
$ |
5,784 |
|
|
$ |
4,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
20,686 |
|
|
$ |
4,689 |
|
|
|
$ |
3,902 |
|
|
$ |
3,195 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers of OREO property |
|
|
952 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions related to acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net |
|
|
278,507 |
|
|
|
471,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
17,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
7,416 |
|
|
|
71,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets, net |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
10,899 |
|
|
|
83,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
306,997 |
|
|
|
491,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
37,525 |
|
|
|
32,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,756 |
|
|
|
8,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements
5
COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION
General
Community Bankers Trust Corporation (the Company) is a bank holding company that was
incorporated under Delaware law on April 6, 2005. The Company is headquartered in Glen Allen,
Virginia and is the holding company for Essex Bank (the Bank), a Virginia state bank with 25
full-service offices in Virginia, Maryland and Georgia. Bank of Essex changed its name to Essex
Bank on April 20, 2009.
The Company was initially formed as a special purpose acquisition company to effect a merger,
capital stock exchange, asset acquisition or other similar business combination with an operating
business in the banking industry. Prior to its acquisition of two bank holding companies in 2008,
the Companys activities were limited to organizational matters, completing its initial public
offering and seeking and evaluating possible business combination opportunities. On May 31, 2008,
the Company acquired each of TransCommunity Financial Corporation, a Virginia corporation (TFC),
and BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc., a Virginia corporation (BOE). The Company changed
its corporate name in connection with the acquisitions. On November 21, 2008, the Bank acquired
certain assets and assumed all deposit liabilities relating to four former branch offices of The
Community Bank (TCB), a Georgia state-chartered bank. On January 30, 2009, the Bank acquired
certain assets and assumed all deposit liabilities relating to seven former branch offices of
Suburban Federal Savings Bank, Crofton, Maryland (SFSB).
The Bank was established in 1926 and is headquartered in Tappahannock, Virginia. The Bank
engages in a general commercial banking business and provides a wide range of financial services
primarily to individuals and small businesses, including individual and commercial demand and time
deposit accounts, commercial and consumer loans, travelers checks, safe deposit box facilities,
investment services and fixed rate residential mortgages. Fourteen offices are located in Virginia,
primarily from the Chesapeake Bay to just west of Richmond, seven are located in Maryland along the
Baltimore-Washington corridor and four are located in the Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan market.
The consolidated statements presented include accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned
subsidiary. All significant intercompany accounts have been eliminated. In the opinion of
management, the accompanying financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to fairly
present the financial position of the Company at each of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
The statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys consolidated financial statements
and the accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements included in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments (consisting of normal accruals) were made that are necessary to present fairly the
financial position of the Company at September 30, 2009, and the results of its operations and its
cash flows for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
The statements and related notes have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, certain information and footnote
disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) are not presented pursuant to such
rules and regulations, because the periods reported are not comparable.
Predecessors
From its inception until consummation of the acquisitions of TFC and BOE on May 31, 2008, the
Company was a special purpose acquisition company, as described above, and had no substantial
operations. Accordingly, since the Companys operating activities prior to the acquisitions were
insignificant relative to those of TFC and BOE, management believes that both TFC and BOE are the
Companys predecessors. Management has reached this conclusion based upon an evaluation of facts
and circumstances, including the historical life of each of TFC and BOE, the historical level of
operations of each of TFC and BOE, the purchase price paid for each of TFC and BOE and the fact
that the consolidated Companys operations, revenues and expenses after the acquisitions are most
similar in all respects to those of BOEs and TFCs historical periods. Accordingly, the historical
statements of operations for the five months ended May 31, 2008 and statements of cash flows of
each of TFC and BOE for the five months ended May 31, 2008 have been presented.
The Company is in the process of amending its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and
its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for each of the periods ended March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009 to include the financial statements of its predecessors.
6
2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to GAAP and to the general
practices within the banking industry. The interim financial statements have not been audited;
however, in the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements have been
included. Operating results for the three and nine month period ended September 30, 2009, are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009.
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period balances to conform to the current
period presentation.
The Companys financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The financial
information contained within the statements is, to a significant extent, financial information that
is based on measures of the financial effects of transactions and events that have already
occurred. A variety of factors could affect the ultimate value that is obtained either when earning
income, recognizing an expense, recovering an asset or relieving a liability. The Company uses
historical loss factors as one factor in determining the inherent loss that may be present in its
loan portfolio. Actual losses could differ significantly from the historical factors that the
Company uses. In addition, GAAP itself may change from one previously acceptable method to another
method. Although the economics of the Companys transactions would be the same, the timing of
events that would impact its transactions could change. In preparing the financial statements, the
Company has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to the financial statement date
through the filing date of November 16, 2009 for potential recognition or disclosure.
3. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
The Financial Accounting Standards Boards (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)
became effective on July 1, 2009. At that date, the ASC became FASBs officially recognized source
of authoritative GAAP applicable to all public and non-public non-governmental entities,
superseding existing FASB, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), Emerging
Issues Task Force (EITF) and related literature. Rules and
interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission under
the authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC
registrants. All other accounting literature is considered non-authoritative. The switch to the ASC
affects the way companies refer to U.S. GAAP in financial statements and accounting policies.
Citing particular content in the ASC involves specifying the unique numeric path to the content
through the Topic, Subtopic, Section and Paragraph structure. The adoption of FASB ASC had no
impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the
FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157) (ASC 820 Fair Value Measurements
and Disclosures). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in
generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements, but rather, provides enhanced guidance
to other pronouncements that require or permit assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value.
The Company adopted SFAS 157 on January 1, 2008. The FASB approved a one-year deferral for the
implementation of the Statement for nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a nonrecurring basis. The Company adopted
the provisions of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities as of January 1, 2009 without a
material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141(R),
Business Combinations (SFAS 141(R)) (ASC 805 Business Combinations). The Standard significantly
changed the financial accounting and reporting of business combination transactions. SFAS 141(R)
establishes principles for how an acquirer recognizes and measures the identifiable assets
acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree; recognizes and
measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; and
determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the
nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS 141(R) is effective for acquisition
dates on or after the beginning of an entitys first year that begins after December 15, 2008. The
Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 141(R) with respect to the SFSB acquisition.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) on Statement No. 141(R)-1 (FSP FAS
141(R)-1), Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That
Arise from Contingencies (ASC 805 Business Combinations). FSP FAS 141(R)-1 amends and clarifies
SFAS 141(R) to address application issues on initial recognition and measurement, subsequent
measurement and accounting, and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in
a business combination. The FSP is effective for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies
in business combinations for which the
7
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after December 15, 2008. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 141(R) with respect to the
SFSB acquisition.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and
Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying
Transactions That Are Not Orderly (ASC 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures). FSP FAS 157-4
provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS 157 when the volume
and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. The FSP also
includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. FSP FAS
157-4 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied
prospectively. Earlier adoption is permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company
does not expect the adoption of FSP FAS 157-4 to have a material impact on its consolidated
financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair
Value of Financial Instruments (ASC 825 Financial Instruments and ASC 270 Interim Reporting). FSP
FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 amends SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments, to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim
reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. In
addition, the FSP amends APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require those
disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. The FSP is effective
for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009, with earlier adoption permitted for periods ending
after March 15, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 to
have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (ASC 320 Investments Debt and Equity Securities). FSP FAS
115-2 and FAS 124-2 amends other-than-temporary impairment guidance for debt securities to make
guidance more operational and to improve the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary
impairments on debt and equity securities. The FSP does not amend existing recognition and
measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of equity securities. FSP FAS
115-2 and FAS 124-2 are effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, with
earlier adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company does not expect
the adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial
statements.
In April 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 111
(SAB 111). SAB 111 amends and replaces SAB Topic 5.M. in the SAB Series entitled Other Than
Temporary Impairment of Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. SAB 111 maintains the
SEC Staffs previous views related to equity securities and amends Topic 5.M. to exclude debt
securities from its scope. The Company does not expect the implementation of SAB 111 to have a
material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 165, Subsequent
Events (ASC 855 Subsequent Events). SFAS 165 establishes general standards of accounting for and
disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are
issued or are available to be issued. SFAS 165 is effective for interim and annual periods ending
after June 15, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 165 to have a material impact
on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 166, Accounting
for Transfers of Financial Assets an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (ASC 860 Transfers and
Servicing). SFAS 166 provides guidance to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness,
and comparability of the information that a report entity provides in its financial statements
about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position,
financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferors continuing involvement, if any, in
transferred financial assets. SFAS 166 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after
November 15, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 166 to have a material impact
on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 167, Amendments
to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (ASC 810 Consolidation). SFAS 167 improves financial reporting by
enterprises involved with variable interest entities. SFAS 167 is effective for interim and annual
periods ending after November 15, 2009. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company does not expect
the adoption of SFAS 167 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 168, The FASB
Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 (ASC 105 Generally Accepted Accounting Principles). SFAS
168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification which will become
8
the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the
FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. SFAS 168 is effective immediately. The Company
does not expect the adoption of SFAS 168 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial
statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued EITF Issue No. 09-1, Accounting for Own-Share Lending
Arrangements in Contemplation of Convertible Debt Issuance or Other Financing (ASC 470 Debt).
EITF Issue No. 09-1 clarifies how an entity should account for an own-share lending arrangement
that is entered into in contemplation of a convertible debt offering. EITF Issue No. 09-1 is
effective for arrangements entered into on or after June 15, 2009. Early adoption is prohibited.
The Company does not expect the adoption of EITF Issue No. 09-1 to have a material impact on its
consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 112
(SAB 112). SAB 112 revises or rescinds portions of the interpretative guidance included in the
codification of SABs in order to make the interpretive guidance consistent with current U.S. GAAP.
The Company does not expect the adoption of SAB 112 to have a material impact on its consolidated
financial statements.
In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-05 (ASU 2009-05), Fair
Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value. ASU 2009-05
amends Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Overall, and provides
clarification for the fair value measurement of liabilities. ASU 2009-05 is effective for the first
reporting period including interim period beginning after issuance. The Company does not expect
the adoption of ASU 2009-05 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-12 (ASU 2009-12),
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Investments in Certain Entities That
Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent). ASU 2009-12 provides guidance on
estimating the fair value of alternative investments. ASU 2009-12 is effective for interim and
annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU
2009-12 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-15 (ASU 2009-15), Accounting
for Own-Share Lending Arrangements in Contemplation of Convertible Debt Issuance or Other
Financing. ASU 2009-15 amends Subtopic 470-20 to expand accounting and reporting guidance for
own-share lending arrangements issued in contemplation of convertible debt issuance. ASU 2009-15 is
effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2009 and interim periods within those
fiscal years for arrangements outstanding as of the beginning of those fiscal years. The Company
does not expect the adoption of ASU 2009-15 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial
statements.
4. MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
Business Combinations
On May 31, 2008, the Company acquired each of TFC and BOE. The transaction with TFC was valued
at $53.0 million. Total consideration paid to TFC shareholders consisted of 6,544,840 shares of the
Companys common stock issued. The transaction resulted in total assets acquired at May 31, 2008 of
$268.8 million, including $241.9 million of loans, and liabilities assumed were $241.7 million,
including $232.1 million of deposits. The transaction with BOE was valued at $53.9 million. Total
consideration paid to BOE shareholders consisted of 6,957,405 shares of the Companys common stock
issued. This transaction resulted in total assets acquired at May 31, 2008 of $317.6 million,
including $233.3 million of loans, and liabilities assumed were $288.0 million, including $256.4
million of deposits. Due to the mergers with each of TFC and BOE, the Company recorded
approximately $37.2 million in goodwill and $15.0 million in core deposit intangibles.
Immediately following the mergers with TFC and BOE, the Company operated TransCommunity Bank
and the Bank as separate banking subsidiaries. TransCommunity Banks offices operated under the
Bank of Goochland, Bank of Powhatan, Bank of Louisa and Bank of Rockbridge division names.
Effective July 31, 2008, TransCommunity Bank was consolidated into the Bank under the Banks state
charter. As a result, the Company was a one-bank holding company at the September 30, 2008
reporting date.
Acquisition of Georgia Operations
On November 21, 2008, the Bank acquired certain assets and assumed all deposit liabilities
relating to four former branch offices of The Community Bank (TCB), a Georgia state-chartered
bank. The transaction was consummated pursuant to a Purchase and
9
Assumption Agreement, dated November 21, 2008, by and among the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC), as Receiver for The Community Bank, the Bank and the FDIC.
Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase and Assumption Agreement, the Bank assumed approximately
$600 million in deposits, approximately $250 million of which were deemed to be core deposits, and
paid the FDIC a premium of 1.36% on all deposits, excluding brokered and internet deposits. All
deposits have been fully assumed, and all deposits insured prior to the closing of the transaction
maintain their current insurance coverage. Other than loans fully secured by deposit accounts, the
Bank did not purchase any loans but is providing loan servicing to TCBs former loan customers.
Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase and Assumption Agreement, the Bank had 60 days to evaluate
and, at its sole option, purchase any of the remaining TCB loans. The Bank purchased 175 loans
totaling $21 million on January 9, 2009. In addition, the Bank agreed to purchase all four former
banking premises of TCB for $6.4 million on February 19, 2009.
Acquisition of Maryland Operations
On January 30, 2009, the Bank acquired certain assets and assumed all deposit liabilities
relating to seven former branch offices of Suburban Federal Savings Bank, Crofton, Maryland
(SFSB). The transaction was consummated pursuant to a Purchase and Assumption Agreement, dated
January 30, 2009, by and among the FDIC, as Receiver for SFSB, the Bank and the FDIC.
Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase and Assumption Agreement, the Bank assumed approximately
$303 million in deposits, all of which were deemed to be core deposits. The Bank bid a negative $45
million for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The Bank acquired approximately $348
million in loans and other assets and agreed to provide loan servicing to SFSBs existing loan
customers. The Bank has entered into shared-loss agreements with the FDIC with respect to certain
covered assets acquired. All deposits have been fully assumed, and all deposits maintain their
current insurance coverage. As a result of the acquisition of SFSBs operations, the Company
recorded a one-time pre-tax gain of $21.3 million in the first quarter of 2009.
Under the shared-loss agreements, the FDIC will reimburse the Bank for 80% of losses arising
from covered loan assets, on the first $118 million of all losses on such covered loans, and for
95% of losses on covered loans thereafter. Under the shared-loss agreements, a loss on a covered
loan is defined generally as a realized loss incurred through a permitted disposition, foreclosure,
short-sale or restructuring of the covered asset. As described below, the reimbursements for losses
on single family one-to-four residential mortgage loans are to be made monthly until the end of the
month in which the 10th anniversary of the closing of the transaction occurs, and the
reimbursements for losses on other loans are to be made quarterly until the end of the quarter in
which the fifth anniversary of the closing of the transaction occurs. The shared-loss agreements
provide for indemnification from the first dollar of losses without any threshold requirement. The
reimbursable losses from the FDIC are based on the book value of the relevant loan as determined by
the FDIC at the date of the transaction, January 30, 2009. New loans made after that date are not
covered by the shared-loss agreements.
The Company determined the value of the intangible assets and the fair value of assets
acquired and liabilities assumed that are used to calculate negative goodwill in the transaction.
The values determined for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed may be amended within 12
months of the transaction if management has reason to believe that there has been a material change
in the initial values recorded. See Note 8 for additional information related to certain
assets covered under the FDIC shared-loss agreements.
5. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The Company follows SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which prescribes the
accounting for goodwill and intangible assets subsequent to initial recognition. Provisions within
SFAS 142 discontinue any amortization of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives, and
require at least an annual impairment review or more often if certain impairment conditions exist.
With the TFC and BOE mergers consummated May 31, 2008, there were significant amounts of goodwill
and other intangible assets recorded. Goodwill was assessed for potential impairment as of May 31,
2009, the anniversary date of the mergers.
Since the mergers in 2008, there has been further decline in economic conditions, which has
significantly affected the banking sector and the Companys financial condition and results. The
Companys average closing stock price during the second quarter of 2008 and 2009 was $6.64 per
share and $3.67 per share, respectively, which represented a 44.73% decline. On the last business
day prior to May 31, 2009, the closing stock price was $3.10 per share.
10
The first step in identifying potential impairment involves comparing the current fair value
of such goodwill to its recorded or carrying amount. If the carrying value exceeds such fair
value, there is possible impairment. Next, a second step is performed to determine the amount of
the impairment, if any. This step requires a comparison of the Companys book value to the fair
value of its assets, liabilities, and intangibles. If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the
fair value, an impairment charge must be recorded in an amount equal to the excess. Management
retained a business valuation expert to assist in determining the level and extent to which
goodwill was impaired. The Company determined that goodwill was impaired as of May 31, 2009, and a
$24.0 million impairment charge was recorded during the second quarter of 2009. Because the
acquisitions were considered tax-free exchanges, the goodwill impairment charge cannot be deducted
for tax purposes, and as such, an income tax benefit cannot be recorded. Due to this tax
treatment, the goodwill impairment charge will be reflected as a permanent difference in the
deferred tax calculation. Goodwill will be next assessed for potential impairment as of December
31, 2009.
Also, upon further evaluation of the original amount recorded for goodwill associated with the
mergers with each of TFC and BOE, adjustments of $2.9 million were made to goodwill as of December
31, 2008, which is reflected as a restated amount in the consolidated statement of financial
condition and consolidated statement of changes in stockholders equity of the consolidated
financial statements in this report. The restated amount was primarily related to properly
reflecting the fair value of the options acquired by the Company at the time of its mergers versus
the face value of the options, which was originally recorded. This adjustment to goodwill has no
effect on the Companys 2008 or 2009 net income.
Core deposit intangible assets are amortized over the period of expected benefit, ranging from
2.6 to 9 years. Due to the mergers with TFC and BOE on May 31, 2008, the Company recorded
approximately $15.0 million in core deposit intangible assets. Core deposit intangibles related to
the Georgia and Maryland transactions equaled $3.1 million and $2.2 million, respectively, and will
be amortized over approximately 9 years.
Goodwill and core deposit intangible assets are presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
Value |
|
Amortization |
|
Impairment |
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill (restated) |
|
$ |
37,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
37,184 |
|
Core deposit intangibles |
|
$ |
18,132 |
|
|
$ |
969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
37,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24,032 |
|
|
$ |
13,152 |
|
Core deposit intangibles |
|
$ |
20,290 |
|
|
$ |
2,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,645 |
|
6. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company utilizes fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain
assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Securities available-for-sale,
trading securities and derivatives, if present, are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.
Additionally, from time to time, the Company may be required to record at fair value other assets
on a nonrecurring basis, such as loans held for sale, loans held for investment and certain other
assets. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve application of lower of cost or
market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.
Fair Value Hierarchy
Under FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, the Company groups assets and
liabilities at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities
are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:
Level 1 Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active
markets.
11
Level 2 Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets,
quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based
valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.
Level 3 Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one
significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect
estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
Valuation techniques include use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar
techniques.
Following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities recorded
at fair value.
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
Investment securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value each reporting period.
Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not
available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation
techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the securitys credit
rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions. The Company only
utilizes third party vendors to provide fair value data for purposes of recording amounts related
to the fair value measurements of its securities available for sale portfolio. An AICPA Statement
on Auditing Standard Number 70 (SAS 70) report is obtained from the third party vendor on an annual
basis. The third party vendor also utilizes a reputable pricing company for security market data.
The third party vendor has controls and edits in place for month-to month market checks and zero
pricing. The Company makes no adjustments to the pricing service data received for its securities
available for sale.
Level 1 securities include those traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock
Exchange, U.S. Treasury securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter
markets and money market funds. Level 2 securities include mortgage-backed securities issued by
government sponsored entities, municipal bonds and corporate debt securities. Securities classified
as Level 3 include asset-backed securities in less liquid markets.
Loans held for sale
Loans held for sale are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value each reporting period, and
are comprised of residential mortgages. These loans are held for a short period of time with the
intention of being sold on the secondary market. Therefore, the fair value is determined on rates
currently offered using observable market information, which does not deviate materially from the
cost value. If there are any adjustments to record the loan at the lower of cost of market value,
it would be reflected in the consolidated statements of income. There
were no loans held for sale at September 30, 2009.
Loans
Except
for loans that the Company acquired in the SFSB transaction, the Company does not record unimpaired loans held for investment at fair value each reporting
period. However, from time to time, a loan is considered impaired and an allowance for loan losses
is established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be
made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement
are considered impaired. The fair value of impaired loans is
estimated using one of several methods, including collateral value, market value of similar debt,
enterprise value, liquidation value and discounted cash flows. Those impaired loans not requiring
an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral
exceed the recorded investments in such loans. At September 30, 2009, substantially all of the
total impaired loans were evaluated based on the fair value of the collateral. In accordance with
ASC 20, impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral
require classification in the fair value hierarchy. When the fair value of the collateral is based
on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company records the impaired loan
as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or
management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised
value and there is no observable market price, the Company records the impaired loan as
nonrecurring Level 3.
12
Other real estate owned
Other real estate owned (OREO), including foreclosed assets, are adjusted to fair value upon
transfer of the loans to foreclosed assets. Subsequently, OREO is carried at the lower of carrying
value or fair value. Fair value is based upon independent market prices, appraised values of the
collateral or managements estimation of the value of the collateral. When the fair value of the
collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company records
the OREO as a nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management
determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there
is no observable market price, the Company records the foreclosed asset as nonrecurring Level 3.
Goodwill
See Note 5 for a description of valuation methodologies for goodwill.
Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The table below presents the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value
on a recurring basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury issue and US.
government agencies |
|
$ |
16,103 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16,103 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
State, county, and municipal |
|
$ |
94,034 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
94,034 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Corporates and other bonds |
|
$ |
2,834 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,834 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Mortgage backed securities |
|
$ |
56,857 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
56,857 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Financial stocks |
|
$ |
1,356 |
|
|
$ |
1,356 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
171,184 |
|
|
$ |
1,356 |
|
|
$ |
169,828 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Loans held for sale |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
171,184 |
|
|
$ |
1,356 |
|
|
$ |
169,828 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company had no Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30,
2009.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
The Company may be required, from time to time, to measure certain assets at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. These assets include assets that are measured at the
lower of cost value or market value that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the
period. The table below presents the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a nonrecurring basis, excluding FDIC covered assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans impaired loans |
|
$ |
123,460 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
114,685 |
|
|
$ |
8,775 |
|
Other real estate owned (OREO) |
|
$ |
1,175 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,175 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
13,152 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
137,787 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
115,860 |
|
|
$ |
21,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company had no Level 1 assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at September
30, 2009.
ASC
820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, requires disclosure of the fair value of
financial assets and financial liabilities, including those financial assets and financial
liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or non-recurring
basis. The fair values and carrying values are as follows:
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Value |
|
Value |
Financial assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
29,298 |
|
|
$ |
29,315 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
171,184 |
|
|
|
171,184 |
|
Securities held to maturity |
|
|
121,023 |
|
|
|
124,883 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
8,355 |
|
|
|
8,355 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans excluding covered loans |
|
|
553,241 |
|
|
|
546,242 |
|
FDIC loss share covered assets |
|
|
265,460 |
|
|
|
265,460 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
5,401 |
|
|
|
5,401 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
13,152 |
|
|
|
13,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
1,027,529 |
|
|
|
1,033,024 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
41,155 |
|
|
|
46,035 |
|
7. SECURITIES
Amortized costs and fair values of securities available for sale at September 30, 2009 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
U.S. Treasury issue and other
U.S. Government agencies |
|
$ |
15,589 |
|
|
$ |
514 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16,103 |
|
State, county and municipal |
|
|
90,976 |
|
|
|
3,275 |
|
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
94,034 |
|
Corporates and other bonds |
|
|
2,761 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,834 |
|
Mortgage backed securities |
|
|
55,392 |
|
|
|
1,469 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
56,857 |
|
Other securities |
|
|
1,293 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
1,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available for sale |
|
$ |
166,011 |
|
|
$ |
5,496 |
|
|
$ |
(323 |
) |
|
$ |
171,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value and gross unrealized losses for securities available for sale, totaled by the length
of time that individual securities have been in a continuous gross unrealized loss position, at
September 30, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
State, county and municipal |
|
$ |
2,075 |
|
|
$ |
(193 |
) |
|
$ |
2,204 |
|
|
$ |
(24 |
) |
|
$ |
4,279 |
|
|
$ |
(217 |
) |
Mortgage backed securities |
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Other securities |
|
|
1,092 |
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
available for sale |
|
$ |
3,877 |
|
|
$ |
(293 |
) |
|
$ |
2,216 |
|
|
$ |
(30 |
) |
|
$ |
6,093 |
|
|
$ |
(323 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2009, there were $2.2 million of securities available for sale that were in a
continuous loss position for more than twelve months with unrealized losses of $30,000 and
consisted primarily of municipal obligations. Management continually monitors the fair value and
credit quality of the Companys investment portfolio. Furthermore, a third party vendor prepares a
report for other than temporarily impaired evaluations. Management reviews this report monthly,
and there were no investments considered other than temporarily impaired at September 30, 2009.
Amortized costs and fair values of securities held to maturity at September 30, 2009 were as
follows:
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
U.S. Treasury issue and other
U.S. Government agencies |
|
$ |
748 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
747 |
|
State, county and municipal |
|
|
13,104 |
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,963 |
|
Corporates and other bonds |
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,056 |
|
Mortgage backed securities |
|
|
106,141 |
|
|
|
3,078 |
|
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
109,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities held to maturity |
|
$ |
121,023 |
|
|
$ |
3,963 |
|
|
$ |
(103 |
) |
|
$ |
124,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value and gross unrealized losses for securities held to maturity, totaled by the
length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous gross unrealized loss position,
at September 30, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
U.S. Treasury issue and other
U.S. Government agencies |
|
$ |
748 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
748 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
Mortgage backed securities |
|
|
10,501 |
|
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,501 |
|
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities held to maturity |
|
$ |
11,249 |
|
|
$ |
(103 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,249 |
|
|
$ |
(103 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management continually monitors the fair value and credit quality of the Companys investment
portfolio. At September 30, 2009, all impairments are considered temporary; there are no other
than temporary impairments. The Company does not intend to sell the securities. It is not likely
that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost. The
Company expects to fully recover its amortized cost basis even if it does not intend to sell the
impaired securities. At this time, the Company considers all impairments to be temporary since the
unrealized losses are related to market risk and not credit risk. Issuers of the securities both
held to maturity and available for sale are of suitable credit quality, and all of the securities
are of investment grade.
The Companys investment in Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock totaled $3.6 million at
September 30, 2009. FHLB stock is restricted since it is not actively traded on an exchange, and
is owned solely by the FHLB and its member institutions. The Company records FHLB stock on a cost
basis. When evaluating FHLB stock for impairment, its value is based on recovery of the par value
rather than by recognizing temporary decline in value. While the FHLB temporarily suspended
dividend payments on its stock and repurchases of excess capital stock during 2009, it declared an
annualized dividend rate of 0.41% for the third quarter of 2009, which is scheduled for payment in
November 2009.
8. FDIC RELATED ASSETS
Under the shared-loss agreements, the FDIC will reimburse the Bank for 80% of losses arising
from covered loan assets, on the first $118 million of such covered loans, and for 95% of losses on
covered loans thereafter. Under the shared-loss agreements, a loss on a covered loan is defined
generally as a realized loss incurred through a permitted disposition, foreclosure, short-sale or
restructuring of the covered asset. As described below, the reimbursements for losses on single
family one-to-four residential mortgage loans are to be made monthly until the end of the month in
which the 10th anniversary of the closing of the transaction occurs, and the reimbursements for
losses on other loans are to be made quarterly until the end of the quarter in which the fifth
anniversary of the closing of the transaction occurs. The shared-loss agreements provide for
indemnification from the first dollar of losses without any threshold requirement. The reimbursable
losses from the FDIC are based on the book value of the relevant loan as determined by the FDIC at
the date of the transaction, January 30, 2009. New loans made after that date are not covered by
the shared-loss agreements.
Codification Subtopic 310-30 (originally issued as the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants (AICPA) Statement of Position 03-3 (SOP 03-3), Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt
Securities Acquired in a Transfer), was adopted for loan acquisitions, and applies to loans with
evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination, acquired by completion of a transfer
for which it is probable, at acquisition, that the investor will be unable to collect all
contractually required payments
15
receivable. In our acquisition of SFSB, the preliminary fair value
of SOP 03-3 loans was determined based on assigned risk ratings, expected cash flows and the fair
value of the collateral. The fair value of non SOP 03-3 loans was determined based on preliminary
estimates of default probabilities. The Company determined which purchased loans were impaired at
the time of the acquisition, and will consider those loans for SOP 03-3 application. Those loans
that were not considered impaired at the time of acquisition will not be considered for SOP 03-3.
Since there are FDIC shared-loss agreements, the Bank recorded an FDIC receivable to the extent
amounts will be reimbursed for losses incurred, and is included in the amount reported as
Loans covered by FDIC shared-loss agreements. The carrying amount of FDIC covered assets at September 30, 2009, were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non SOP 03-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOP 03-3 Loans |
|
Loans |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Commercial related loans |
|
$ |
12,716 |
|
|
$ |
10,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,212 |
|
Mortgage and other loans |
|
|
10,421 |
|
|
|
129,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139,980 |
|
Foreclosed real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,823 |
|
|
|
16,823 |
|
FDIC receivable for covered assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,885 |
|
|
|
81,885 |
|
Estimated loss reimbursement from
FDIC for expenses incurred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,560 |
|
|
|
3,560 |
|
|
|
|
Total FDIC covered assets |
|
$ |
23,137 |
|
|
$ |
140,055 |
|
|
$ |
102,268 |
|
|
$ |
265,460 |
|
|
|
|
As of the acquisition date, the preliminary estimates of the contractually required
payments receivable for all SOP 03-3 loans acquired in the SFSB acquisition were $84.7 million, the
cash flows expected to be collected were $32.9 million including interest, and the estimated fair
value of the loans were approximately $26.0 million. These amounts were determined based upon the
estimated remaining life of the underlying loans, which include the effects of estimated
prepayments. At September 30, 2009, a majority of these loans were valued based on the liquidation
value of the underlying collateral. Interest income, through accretion of the difference between
the carrying amount of the SOP 03-3 loans and the expected cash flows, is expected to be recognized
on the remaining loans. There was no allowance for credit losses related to these SOP 03-3 loans
at September 30, 2009. Certain amounts related to the SOP 03-3 loans and related indemnification
amounts are preliminary estimates. The Company expects to finalize its analysis of these assets
within 12 months of the acquisition date and, therefore, adjustments to the estimated amounts are
likely.
See Item 2. Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Critical Accounting Policies Covered Assets under the FDIC Shared-Loss Agreements for a discussion
of managements analysis and judgments in presenting the information above.
9. LOANS
The Companys loan portfolio, segregated by loans covered by the FDIC shared-loss agreement
(Covered Loans) and loans not covered by this agreement (Non-covered Loans), at September 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, was comprised of the following:
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Non-covered loans |
|
|
Covered Loans |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open End 1-4 Family Loans |
|
$ |
20,075 |
|
|
|
3.52 |
% |
|
$ |
26,359 |
|
|
|
9.92 |
% |
|
$ |
46,434 |
|
|
|
5.56 |
% |
|
$ |
30,323 |
|
|
|
5.80 |
% |
1-4 Family First Liens |
|
|
108,380 |
|
|
|
19.03 |
% |
|
|
166,080 |
|
|
|
62.53 |
% |
|
|
274,460 |
|
|
|
32.86 |
% |
|
|
99,284 |
|
|
|
18.98 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total residential 1-4 family |
|
|
128,455 |
|
|
|
22.55 |
% |
|
|
192,439 |
|
|
|
72.45 |
% |
|
|
320,894 |
|
|
|
38.42 |
% |
|
|
129,607 |
|
|
|
24.78 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owner occupied nonfarm nonresidential |
|
|
43,423 |
|
|
|
7.62 |
% |
|
|
38,387 |
|
|
|
14.45 |
% |
|
|
81,810 |
|
|
|
9.80 |
% |
|
|
63,218 |
|
|
|
12.09 |
% |
Non owner occupied nonfarm nonresidential |
|
|
111,768 |
|
|
|
19.62 |
% |
|
|
4,261 |
|
|
|
1.60 |
% |
|
|
116,029 |
|
|
|
13.89 |
% |
|
|
93,872 |
|
|
|
17.95 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
155,191 |
|
|
|
27.24 |
% |
|
|
42,648 |
|
|
|
16.05 |
% |
|
|
197,839 |
|
|
|
23.69 |
% |
|
|
157,090 |
|
|
|
30.04 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-4 Family Construction |
|
|
50,842 |
|
|
|
8.93 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
50,842 |
|
|
|
6.09 |
% |
|
|
36,277 |
|
|
|
6.93 |
% |
Other construction and land development |
|
|
131,902 |
|
|
|
23.16 |
% |
|
|
13,115 |
|
|
|
4.94 |
% |
|
|
145,017 |
|
|
|
17.36 |
% |
|
|
103,238 |
|
|
|
19.74 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total construction |
|
|
182,744 |
|
|
|
32.09 |
% |
|
|
13,115 |
|
|
|
4.94 |
% |
|
|
195,859 |
|
|
|
23.45 |
% |
|
|
139,515 |
|
|
|
26.67 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second mortgages |
|
|
14,051 |
|
|
|
2.47 |
% |
|
|
16,779 |
|
|
|
6.32 |
% |
|
|
30,830 |
|
|
|
3.69 |
% |
|
|
15,599 |
|
|
|
2.98 |
% |
Multifamily |
|
|
10,757 |
|
|
|
1.89 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
10,757 |
|
|
|
1.29 |
% |
|
|
9,370 |
|
|
|
1.79 |
% |
Agriculture |
|
|
3,907 |
|
|
|
0.69 |
% |
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
% |
|
|
4,087 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
% |
|
|
5,143 |
|
|
|
0.98 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate loans |
|
|
495,105 |
|
|
|
86.93 |
% |
|
|
265,161 |
|
|
|
99.83 |
% |
|
|
760,266 |
|
|
|
91.03 |
% |
|
|
456,324 |
|
|
|
87.24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agriculture loans |
|
|
1,407 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
1,407 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
% |
|
|
988 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
% |
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
45,348 |
|
|
|
7.96 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
45,348 |
|
|
|
5.43 |
% |
|
|
44,332 |
|
|
|
8.47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial loans |
|
|
46,755 |
|
|
|
8.21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
46,755 |
|
|
|
5.60 |
% |
|
|
45,320 |
|
|
|
8.66 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revolving credit and other
consumer |
|
|
15,977 |
|
|
|
2.81 |
% |
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
% |
|
|
16,341 |
|
|
|
1.96 |
% |
|
|
14,457 |
|
|
|
2.76 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other loans |
|
|
11,700 |
|
|
|
2.05 |
% |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
% |
|
|
11,795 |
|
|
|
1.41 |
% |
|
|
7,005 |
|
|
|
1.34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loans |
|
|
569,537 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
265,620 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
835,157 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
523,106 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
Unearned income on loans |
|
|
(745 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(817 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(780 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Merger related fair value adjustment |
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,811 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
972 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-covered loans |
|
$ |
569,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
245,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
814,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
523,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of information for impaired and nonaccrual loans at September 30,
2009, excluding FDIC covered assets (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance |
|
$ |
96,684 |
|
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance |
|
|
26,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
123,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance related to impaired loans |
|
$ |
9,454 |
|
Total nonaccrual loans |
|
$ |
20,572 |
|
Total loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing |
|
$ |
1,462 |
|
Average investment in impaired loans during the nine months ending September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
100,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income recognized on impaired loans |
|
$ |
919 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income recognized on a cash basis on impaired loans |
|
$ |
919 |
|
|
|
|
|
10. ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
Activity in the allowance for loan losses, for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009 and the period ended September 30, 2008 was comprised of the following:
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
12,185 |
|
|
$ |
6,939 |
|
|
$ |
4,993 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
5,231 |
|
|
|
11,271 |
|
|
|
1,334 |
|
Recoveries of loans
charged off |
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Loans charged off |
|
|
(1,429 |
) |
|
|
(2,305 |
) |
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
16,211 |
|
|
$ |
16,211 |
|
|
$ |
6,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For information reported for September 30, 2008, the figures presented are solely for the
months of June 2008 through September 2008, as the Company did not have banking operations prior to
its merger with each of TFC and BOE at May 31, 2008 and, as such, did not have an allowance for
loan losses.
At September 30, 2009, total impaired loans equaled $123.5 million, excluding FDIC covered
assets. As required by the fair value accounting rules for the SFSB transaction in the first
quarter of 2009, no allowance for loan losses was recorded on loans acquired since the loans were
recorded at fair value and adjusted for expected credit losses, less amounts to be reimbursed by
the FDIC. For additional information regarding the accounting entries, see the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K/A (Amendment No. 1) filed on April 17, 2009, under Note 2 Description of the
Pro Forma Purchase Accounting Adjustments.
Significant provisions were made to the loan loss reserve during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, as economic conditions deteriorated. In addition, net-charge off activity
increased as certain loans were deemed uncollectible.
The following table presents charge-offs and recoveries by loan category for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2009.
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
Recoveries |
|
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
Recoveries |
|
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open End 1-4 Family Loans |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
168 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
168 |
|
1-4 Family First Liens |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total residential 1-4 family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owner occupied nonfarm nonresidential |
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
814 |
|
Non owner occupied nonfarm nonresidential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-4 Family Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
(138 |
) |
Other construction and land development |
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total construction |
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second mortgages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
Multifamily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agriculture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate loans |
|
|
1,397 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
1,214 |
|
|
|
1,789 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
1,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agriculture loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revolving credit and other consumer |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other loans |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-covered loans |
|
$ |
1,429 |
|
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
$ |
1,205 |
|
|
$ |
2,305 |
|
|
$ |
306 |
|
|
$ |
1,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. DEPOSITS
The following table provides interest-bearing deposit information by category for the dates
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance by deposit type |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
NOW |
|
$ |
88,045 |
|
|
$ |
76,575 |
|
MMDA |
|
|
110,353 |
|
|
|
55,200 |
|
Savings |
|
|
58,495 |
|
|
|
34,688 |
|
Time deposits less than $100,000 |
|
|
450,273 |
|
|
|
303,424 |
|
Time deposits greater than $100,000 |
|
|
256,025 |
|
|
|
276,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
963,191 |
|
|
$ |
746,649 |
|
|
|
|
19
12. (LOSS) EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic (loss) earnings per share (EPS) is computed by dividing net income or loss available
to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted EPS is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the
period, including the effect of all potentially dilutive potential common shares outstanding
attributable to stock instruments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)/ |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Per Share |
|
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data) |
|
(Numerator) |
|
|
(Denominator) |
|
|
Amount |
|
For the Three Months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS |
|
$ |
(3,019 |
) |
|
|
21,468 |
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
Effect of dilutive
stock awards and
options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS |
|
$ |
(3,019 |
) |
|
|
21,468 |
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS |
|
$ |
952 |
|
|
|
21,469 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
Effect of dilutive
stock awards and
options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS |
|
$ |
952 |
|
|
|
21,486 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS |
|
$ |
(16,731 |
) |
|
|
21,468 |
|
|
$ |
(0.78 |
) |
Effect of dilutive
stock awards and
options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS |
|
$ |
(16,731 |
) |
|
|
21,468 |
|
|
$ |
(0.78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS |
|
$ |
1,351 |
|
|
|
14,750 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
Effect of dilutive
stock awards and
options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,447 |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS |
|
$ |
1,351 |
|
|
|
16,197 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were 5,973,870 shares in the Company available through options and warrants that were
considered anti-dilutive at September 30, 2009.
13.
DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN
The Company adopted the Bank noncontributory, defined benefit pension plan for all full-time,
pre-merger Bank employees over 21 years of age at May 31, 2008. Benefits are generally based upon
years of service and the employees compensation. The Company funds pension costs in accordance
with the funding provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
276 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
243 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(159 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
3 |
|
Amortization of net obligation at transition |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Amortization of net loss |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
426 |
|
|
|
|
|
20
At September 30, 2009, employer contributions totaled $264,000 for the plan year. The Company
is currently analyzing the Defined Benefit Plan as well as other alternatives, such as enhancing
its Defined Contribution Plan (401(k)). The plan was frozen to new entrants prior to BOEs merger
with the Company.
14. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On October 29, 2009, the Companys Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.04
per share with respect to the Companys outstanding common stock. The dividend will be payable on
November 20, 2009, to stockholders of record at the close of business on November 13, 2009.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion and analysis of the financial condition at September 30, 2009 and
results of operations of the Company for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 should
be read in conjunction with the Companys consolidated financial statements and the accompanying
notes to consolidated financial statements included in this report and in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Overview
Community Bankers Trust Corporation (the Company) is a bank holding company that was
incorporated under Delaware law on April 6, 2005. The Company is headquartered in Glen Allen,
Virginia and is the holding company for Essex Bank, a Virginia state bank with 25 full-service
offices in Virginia, Maryland and Georgia.
The Bank was established in 1926 and is headquartered in Tappahannock, Virginia. The Bank
engages in a general commercial banking business and provides a wide range of financial services
primarily to individuals and small businesses, including individual and commercial demand and time
deposit accounts, commercial and consumer loans, travelers checks, safe deposit box facilities,
investment services and fixed rate residential mortgages. Fourteen branches are located in
Virginia, primarily from the Chesapeake Bay to just west of Richmond, seven are located in Maryland
along the Baltimore-Washington corridor and four are located in the Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan
market. The Bank also operates two loan production offices, one in Fairfax, Virginia, and one in
Cumming, Georgia.
The Company generates a significant amount of its income from the net interest income earned
by the Bank. Net interest income is the difference between interest income and interest expense.
Interest income depends on the amount of interest-earning assets outstanding during the period and
the interest rates earned thereon. The Companys cost of funds is a function of the average amount
of interest-bearing deposits and borrowed money outstanding during the period and the interest
rates paid thereon. The quality of the assets further influences the amount of interest income lost
on non-accrual loans and the amount of additions to the allowance for loan losses. Additionally,
the Bank earns non-interest income from service charges on deposit accounts and other fee or
commission-based
services and products. Other sources of non-interest income can include gains or losses on
securities transactions, gains from loans sales, transactions involving bank-owned property, and
income from Bank Owned Life Insurance (BOLI) policies. The Companys income is offset by
non-interest expense, which consists of goodwill impairment and other charges, salaries and
benefits, occupancy and equipment costs, professional fees, and other operational expenses. The
provision for loan losses and income taxes materially affect income.
Caution About Forward-Looking Statements
The Company makes certain forward-looking statements in this Form 10-Q that are subject to
risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements include statements regarding our
profitability, liquidity, allowance for loan losses, interest rate sensitivity, market risk, growth
strategy, and financial and other goals. These forward-looking statements are generally identified
by phrases such as the Company expects, the Company believes or words of similar import.
These forward-looking statements are subject to significant uncertainties because they are
based upon or are affected by factors, including, without limitation, the effects of and changes in
the following:
|
|
|
general economic and market conditions, either nationally or locally; |
|
|
|
|
the interest rate environment; |
21
|
|
|
competitive pressures among banks and financial institutions or from companies outside the
banking industry; |
|
|
|
|
real estate values; |
|
|
|
|
the quality or composition of the Companys loan or investment portfolios; |
|
|
|
|
the demand for deposit, loan, and investment products and other financial services; |
|
|
|
|
the demand, development and acceptance of new products and services; |
|
|
|
|
the timing of future reimbursements from the FDIC to the Company under the shared-loss
agreements; |
|
|
|
|
consumer profiles and spending and savings habits; |
|
|
|
|
the securities and credit markets; |
|
|
|
|
the integration of banking and other internal operations, and associated costs |
|
|
|
|
managements evaluation of goodwill and other assets on a periodic basis, and any
resulting impairment charges, under applicable accounting standards; |
|
|
|
|
the soundness of other financial institutions with which the Company does business; |
|
|
|
|
inflation; |
|
|
|
|
technology; and |
|
|
|
|
legislative and regulatory requirements. |
These factors and additional risks and uncertainties are described in the Risk Factors
discussion in Part II, Item 1A, of this report.
Although the Company believes that its expectations with respect to the forward-looking
statements are based upon reliable assumptions within the bounds of its knowledge of its business
and operations, there can be no assurance that actual results, performance or achievements of the
Company will not differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed
or implied by such forward-looking statements.
Critical Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of the Companys critical accounting policies that are highly
dependent on estimates, assumptions and judgments.
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
The allowance for loan and lease losses (ALLL) is maintained at a level that is appropriate
to cover estimated credit losses on individually evaluated loans determined to be impaired, as well
as estimated credit losses inherent in the remainder of the loan and lease portfolio. Since
arriving at an appropriate ALLL involves a high degree of management judgment, an ongoing quarterly
analysis to develop a range of estimated losses is utilized. In accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States, best estimates within the range of potential
credit loss to determine the appropriate ALLL is utilized. Credit losses are charged and recoveries
are credited to the ALLL.
The Company utilizes an internal risk rating system for its loans. Those larger credits that
exhibit probable or well defined credit weaknesses are subject to individual review. The borrowers
cash flow, adequacy of collateral coverage, and other options available to the Company, including
legal remedies, are evaluated. The review of individual loans includes those loans that are
impaired as defined by SFAS 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan. Collectability
of both principal and interest when assessing the need
22
for loss provision is considered. Historical loss rates are applied to other loans not subject
to specific allocations. The loss rates are determined from historical net charge offs experienced
by the Bank.
Historical loss rates for commercial and retail loans are adjusted for significant factors
that, in managements judgment, reflect the impact of any current conditions on loss recognition.
Factors that are considered include delinquency trends, current economic conditions and trends,
strength of supervision and administration of the loan portfolio, levels of underperforming loans,
level of recoveries to prior years charge offs, trend in loan losses, industry concentrations and
their relative strengths, amount of unsecured loans and underwriting exceptions. These factors are
reviewed quarterly and a weighted score is assigned depending on the level and extent of the risk.
The total of each of these weighted factors is then applied against the applicable portion of the
portfolio and the ALLL is adjusted to ensure an appropriate level.
The Companys financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). The financial information contained within the
statements is, to a significant extent, financial information that is based on measures of the
financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred. A variety of factors could
affect the ultimate value that is obtained either when earning income, recognizing an expense,
recovering an asset or relieving a liability. The Company uses historical loss factors as one
factor in determining the inherent loss that may be present in its loan portfolio. Actual losses
could differ significantly from the historical factors that the Company uses. In addition, GAAP
itself may change from one previously acceptable method to another method. Although the economics
of the Companys transactions would be the same, the timing of events that would impact its
transactions could change.
Income Taxes
The Company follows tax guidance, including the Financial Accounting Standards Boards (FASB)
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes- an interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS 109). In determining the appropriate level of income taxes to be
recorded each reporting, management assesses the potential tax effects and records those amounts in
both current and deferred tax accounts, whether may be an asset or liability. In addition, an
income tax expense or benefit is determined, which is recorded on the consolidated income
statement.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The Company adopted SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Accordingly, goodwill is
no longer subject to amortization over its estimated useful life, but is subject to at least an
annual assessment for impairment by applying a fair value-based test. As a result of the mergers
with each of TFC and BOE at May 31, 2008, goodwill was initially recorded for $39.5 million.
Subsequently, adjustments were recorded to properly reflect goodwill on the financial statements.
The Company assessed goodwill for impairment as of the one year anniversary date of the mergers, at
May 31, 2009.
The initial step in identifying potential impairment involves comparing the current fair value
of such goodwill to its recorded or carrying amount. If the carrying value exceeds such fair
value, there is possible impairment. Next, a second step is performed to determine the amount of
the impairment, if any. This requires a comparison of the Companys book value to the fair value
of its assets, liabilities, and intangibles. If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the fair
value, an impairment charge must be recorded in an amount equal to the excess. The Company
determined that goodwill was impaired as of May 31, 2009, and a $24.0 million impairment charge was
recorded during the second quarter of 2009. The goodwill impairment charge was due to an overall
decline in general economic conditions, rapid change in the market valuations of financial
institutions and the discount that shares of the Companys common stock have traded to their
tangible book value for an extended period of time.
Additionally, under SFAS 142, acquired intangible assets (such as core deposit intangibles)
are separately recognized if the benefit of the assets can be sold, transferred, licensed, rented,
or exchanged, and amortized over their useful lives. Branch acquisition transactions were outside
the scope of SFAS 142 and, accordingly, intangible assets related to such transactions continued to
amortize upon the adoption of SFAS 142. The costs of purchased deposit relationships and other
intangible assets, based on independent valuation by a qualified third party, are being amortized
over their estimated lives. Core deposit intangible amortization expense charged to operations was
$565,000 and $1.7 million for the three and six months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. The
Company did not record any goodwill or other intangible prior to the TFC and BOE mergers. As a
result of the TCB and SFSB transactions, core deposit intangibles were recorded of $3.2 million and
$2.2 million, respectively. Also related to the SFSB transaction during the first quarter of 2009
was negative goodwill of $21.3 million ($12.9 million, net of taxes), which was recorded as a
one-time gain within the income statement.
23
Covered Assets under the FDIC Shared-Loss Agreements
The Company acquired certain assets, including loans and other real estate subject to the FDIC
shared-loss agreements, in the SFSB transaction. The Company accounted for this transaction in
accordance with FASB ASC 805, which requires the Company to record the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed at their acquisition date fair values. In addition, impaired loans that were
acquired are accounted for under FASB ASC 310-30 (SOP 03-3, Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt
Securities Acquired in a Transfer.)
In determining the fair value of the impaired loans at the acquisition date, the Company
engaged a third party to perform a full credit review of the loans acquired to assess the
creditworthiness of each borrowing, and to determine which loans were impaired. In addition, the
Company engaged another third party to determine the fair value of the assets acquired in order to
establish the Companys investment in the assets. In determining the fair value, the Company made
assumptions regarding the risk characteristics of the borrowers associated with such assets,
including default probabilities, interest rates, expected cash flows, and any underlying
collateral.
In order to be able to present the appropriate accounting presentation under FASB ASC 805 and
FASB ASC 310-30, the Company must review the details of each loan individually, and not on a pooled
basis. Due to the volume of data that is necessary for the Company to evaluate for this purpose,
the Company has recorded provisional amounts for the covered loans and related FDIC receivable for
the period ended September 30, 2009. As a result, material adjustments to the provisional amounts
may be necessary once the Company completes its evaluation. In addition, due to the existence of
the FDIC shared-loss agreements, the Company is in the process, after application of data on a per
loan basis, of identifying the value of the FDIC receivable asset and will account for this asset
separately from the loans covered by the shared-loss agreements.
The Company expects that full application of the SFSB transaction under FASB ASC 805 and FASB
ASC 310-30 will be applied with the filing of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009. The Company also expects that it may file amendments to this report and
past quarterly reports in 2009 to reflect this revised accounting presentation. The Company cannot
make any assurance that these adjustments will not materially change the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company, as presented in such reports.
Financial Condition
At September 30, 2009, the Company had total assets of $1.239 billion, an increase of $209.4
million or 20.33% from December 31, 2008. Total loans, excluding FDIC covered assets, equaled
$569.5 million at September 30, 2009, increasing $46.2 million, or 8.82% from December 31, 2008.
Securities totaled $300.6 million and increased $8.1 million, or 2.77% during the first nine months
of 2009. The Company had federal funds sold of $5.3 million at September 30, 2009, versus $10.2
million at year-end 2008, a decrease of $4.9 million or 48.00%. The shift in the earning asset mix
as evidenced above is the direct result of managements intention of replacing relatively lower
yielding overnight funds with higher yielding assets of loans and securities.
The increase in the total asset size of the Company was primarily due to the SFSB transaction
in Maryland. At September 30,2009, FDIC covered loans equaled $245.1 million, FDIC covered other
real estate owned equaled $16.8 million, and the FDIC receivable equaled $3.6 million. Securities
from SFSB were incorporated into the Companys securities portfolio at fair value at the effective
time of the transaction, and are not considered covered assets under the terms of the FDIC
shared-loss agreements.
The Company is required to account for the effect of market changes in the value of securities
available-for-sale (AFS) under SFAS 115. The market value of the September 30, 2009 AFS portfolio
was $171.2 million at September 30, 2009, and the net unrealized gain on the AFS portfolio was $3.4
million, net of taxes, and included as part of the Companys accumulated other comprehensive income
of $2.1 million. Since December 31, 2008, the AFS portfolio shifted from a net unrealized loss of $700,000 to a net
unrealized gain of $5.2 million, exclusive of taxes over the first nine months of 2009. The
Company deems the investment portfolio as a viable source of liquidity given the dollar volume of
securities designated available for sale.
Total deposits at September 30, 2009 were $1.028 billion, which increased $221.2 million or
27.43% from December 31, 2008. Deposit growth was attributed to the SFSB transaction, which was
concentrated in certificates of deposit. At September 30, 2009, total deposits in our Maryland
branches aggregated $279.3 million of which $208.8 million were time deposits. Interest-bearing
deposits increased $216.5 million from December 31, 2008 to September 30, 2009.
Noninterest-bearing deposits, in the form of demand deposit accounts, were $64.3 million at
September 30, 2009, an increase of $4.6 million since December 31, 2008. The Companys total
loans-to-deposits ratio, excluding FDIC covered loans, was 55.42% at September 30, 2009 and 64.90%
at December 31, 2008.
Stockholders equity at September 30, 2009 was $146.6 million and represented 11.83% of total
assets. Stockholders equity was $164.4 million, or 15.97% of total assets at December 31, 2008.
24
Results of Operations
Net Income
For the three months ended September 30, 2009, net loss before dividends and accretion on
preferred stock was $2.8 million, compared with net income of $952,000 for the same period in
2008. Net loss available to common stockholders was $3.0 million, which represented $0.14 per
share on a fully diluted basis, versus net income available to common stockholders of $952,000, or
$0.04 per share on a fully diluted basis for the same period in 2008. The loss incurred during the
third quarter of 2009 was primarily the result of a $5.2 million provision for loan losses,
compared to $1.1 million in provisions during the same period in 2008.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, net loss before dividends and accretion on
preferred stock was $15.9 million, compared with net income $1.4 million for the same period in
2008. Net loss available to common stockholders was $16.7 million, which represented $0.78 per
share on a fully diluted basis, versus net income available to common stockholders of $1.4 million,
or $0.08 per share on a fully diluted basis for the same period in 2008. Net loss for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, was driven by the goodwill impairment charge of $24.0 million and
loan loss provisions of $11.3 million. While the $21.3 million gain recorded on the SFSB
transaction in the first quarter partially offset these large expenses, the goodwill impairment
charge does not reduce taxable income and permit an income tax benefit.
Net Interest Income
The Companys results of operations are significantly affected by its ability to manage
effectively the interest rate sensitivity and maturity of its interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities. At September 30, 2009, the Companys interest-earning assets exceeded
its interest-bearing liabilities by approximately $110.4 million, compared with a $137.9 million
excess at December 31, 2008.
Net interest income was $9.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, compared
with $6.2 million for the same period in 2008. For the three months ended September 30, 2009, the
net interest margin was 3.37% compared to 4.26% for the same period in 2008. For the three months
ended September 30, 2009, the net interest spread was 3.10% versus 3.70% for the same period in
2008. The decline in the margin compared with the same period in 2008 was driven by several
factors. First, loan rates declined in the fourth quarter of 2008 due to a prime rate drop.
There was also a large influx of deposits related to TCB transaction in the fourth quarter of 2008
which were subsequently invested in securities versus higher yielding loans. In addition, the SFSB
transaction resulted in further margin compression during 2009 as the Bank inherited a large volume
of FDIC covered non-accruing loans that are included in the margin calculation.
With the acquisitions of TFC and BOE in May 2008, fair market value adjustments were recorded
for assets and liabilities, including interest bearing loans and interest bearing deposits.
However, the amortization of the fair value adjustments for those deposits significantly reduced
interest expense during the third quarter of 2008, far in excess of reductions in interest income
associated with the amortization of the fair value adjustments for loans. As a result, the net
interest margin for the third quarter of 2008 was more positively influenced when compared with the
third quarter of 2009.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, net interest income aggregated $27.7 million,
which generated a net interest margin of 3.32%. The net interest spread for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 equaled 3.04%. A net interest margin analysis is not provided for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008, since there were no banking operations for the Company for the
first five months of 2008.
Components used in determining the net interest spread and the net interest margin, including
yields on assets and costs of funds by category, are depicted in the following table:
25
COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION
NET INTEREST MARGIN ANALYSIS
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Rates |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Rates |
|
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Earned/Paid |
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Earned/Paid |
|
ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees |
|
$ |
559,547 |
|
|
$ |
8,820 |
|
|
|
6.31 |
% |
|
$ |
496,803 |
|
|
$ |
8,497 |
|
|
|
6.84 |
% |
Loans covered by FDIC loss share |
|
|
251,262 |
|
|
|
3,741 |
|
|
|
5.96 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
810,809 |
|
|
|
12,561 |
|
|
|
6.20 |
% |
|
|
496,803 |
|
|
|
8,497 |
|
|
|
6.84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing bank balances |
|
|
11,061 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
2.17 |
% |
|
|
9,384 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
3.54 |
% |
Federal funds sold |
|
|
20,905 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
% |
|
|
5,034 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
1.75 |
% |
Investments (taxable) |
|
|
216,277 |
|
|
|
2,081 |
|
|
|
3.85 |
% |
|
|
50,809 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
4.24 |
% |
Investments (tax exempt) (1) |
|
|
91,927 |
|
|
|
1,358 |
|
|
|
5.91 |
% |
|
|
35,068 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
5.76 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
1,150,979 |
|
|
|
16,070 |
|
|
|
5.58 |
% |
|
|
597,098 |
|
|
|
9,646 |
|
|
|
6.46 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(13,290 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,380 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-earning assets |
|
|
122,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,260,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
681,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand -
Interest bearing |
|
$ |
200,965 |
|
|
$ |
381 |
|
|
|
0.76 |
% |
|
$ |
84,032 |
|
|
$ |
328 |
|
|
|
1.56 |
% |
Savings |
|
|
58,438 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
0.68 |
% |
|
|
31,126 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
1.08 |
% |
Time deposits |
|
|
724,190 |
|
|
|
5,545 |
|
|
|
3.06 |
% |
|
|
314,585 |
|
|
|
2,495 |
|
|
|
3.17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
983,593 |
|
|
|
6,026 |
|
|
|
2.45 |
% |
|
|
429,743 |
|
|
|
2,907 |
|
|
|
2.71 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fed funds purchased |
|
|
1,126 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
0.71 |
% |
|
|
17,408 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
2.32 |
% |
FHLB and other borrowings |
|
|
40,005 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
3.38 |
% |
|
|
28,974 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
3.82 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
1,024,724 |
|
|
|
6,366 |
|
|
|
2.48 |
% |
|
|
476,125 |
|
|
|
3,285 |
|
|
|
2.76 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits |
|
|
61,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
25,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,111,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
537,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
148,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,260,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
681,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.70 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Income and yields are reported on a tax equivalent basis assuming a federal tax rate of 34%. |
26
COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION
NET INTEREST MARGIN ANALYSIS
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Rates |
|
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Earned/Paid |
|
ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees |
|
$ |
547,468 |
|
|
$ |
26,236 |
|
|
|
6.39 |
% |
Loans covered by FDIC loss share |
|
|
237,573 |
|
|
|
10,658 |
|
|
|
5.98 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
785,041 |
|
|
|
36,894 |
|
|
|
6.27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing bank balances |
|
|
26,894 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
1.30 |
% |
Federal funds sold |
|
|
19,808 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
% |
Investments (taxable) |
|
|
248,042 |
|
|
|
7,580 |
|
|
|
4.07 |
% |
Investments (tax exempt) (1) |
|
|
84,281 |
|
|
|
3,747 |
|
|
|
5.93 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
1,164,066 |
|
|
|
48,519 |
|
|
|
5.56 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(10,593 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-earning assets |
|
|
129,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,282,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand -
Interest bearing |
|
$ |
193,705 |
|
|
$ |
1,556 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
% |
Savings |
|
|
54,813 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
0.91 |
% |
Time deposits |
|
|
736,112 |
|
|
|
16,513 |
|
|
|
2.99 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
984,630 |
|
|
|
18,443 |
|
|
|
2.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fed funds purchased |
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
0.76 |
% |
FHLB and other borrowings |
|
|
45,201 |
|
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
|
3.16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
1,030,916 |
|
|
|
19,520 |
|
|
|
2.52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits |
|
|
61,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
28,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,121,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
161,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,282,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
28,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.04 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Income and yields are reported on a tax equivalent basis assuming a
federal tax rate of 34%. |
27
Provision for Credit Losses
For the three months ended September 30, 2009, the Companys provision for loan losses was
$5.2 million compared with $1.1 million in the same period of 2008. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, provisions were $11.3 million compared with $1.3 million in the same period of
2008.
Increases were made to the loan loss reserve during the third quarter of 2009 as economic
conditions continued to show signs of deterioration, which necessitated further provisions for
impairments of classified assets. The most notable impetus for the provision was evidenced in one
borrowing relationship which was previously impaired and on the Banks watch list. Current
information related to unwinding the credit necessitated further impairment which amounted to over
50% of the provision for the quarter. The remaining balance of the provision during the third
quarter was attributable to downgraded credits and further insulation from the economic downturn.
Management continues to monitor the loan portfolio closely and make appropriate adjustments using
the Companys internal risk rating system.
While the Maryland loan portfolio contains significant risk, it was considered in determining
the initial fair value, which was reflected in adjustments recorded at the time of the SFSB
transaction, less the FDIC guaranteed portion of losses on covered assets. Net-charge off activity
has increased during recent quarters, a trend that is expected to continue until economic
conditions begin to subside. Please refer to the Asset Quality discussion below for further
analysis.
Noninterest Income
For the three months ended September 30, 2009, noninterest income was $1.3 million, compared
with $754,000 in the same period of 2008. This increase of $520,000 or 68.97% is primarily
attributable to gains on securities transactions of $612,000 versus none in the same period of
2008. This increase in income was partially offset by a $187,000 loss on sale of other real estate,
increased service charges on deposit accounts of $158,000 over the same period in 2008, and a
decrease in other noninterest income of $63,000.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, noninterest income was $24.7 million.
Excluding the first quarter gain on the SFSB transaction of
$21.3 million, noninterest income would have been
$3.4 million, compared with $1.1 million during the same period of 2008. Service charges on deposit
accounts aggregated $1.9 million compared with $696,000 for the same period in 2008. This increase
of $1.2 million or 167.67% was the result of no banking operations reported for the first five
months of 2008 and an increase in the number of deposit accounts subject to fees and charges
through September 30, 2009. Likewise, other noninterest income equaled $844,000 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, versus $357,000 for the same period in 2008. The Company has
recorded net securities gains of $905,000 through the first nine months of 2009 versus none in the
same period in 2008.
Noninterest Expenses
For the three month period ended September 30, 2009, noninterest expenses were $9.9 million
compared with $4.7 million for the same period in 2008. Salaries and employee benefits were $4.8
million and represented 48.68% of all noninterest expenses for the quarter. Salaries and wages
increased $2.5 million or 103.79% from the same quarter in 2008. The increases in salaries and
wages are the direct result of increased staffing levels from the prior year period related to the
acquisitions of TCB and SFSB coupled with corporate staff hires for positions required in a now
significantly larger financial institution.
Other overhead costs included other operating expenses of $1.8 million, amortization of
intangibles of $565,000, occupancy expenses of $752,000, equipment expense of $436,000, data
processing fees of $743,000, legal fees of $217,000, and other professional fees of $184,000. FDIC
assessments for the quarter equaled $436,000.
For the nine month period ended September 30, 2009, noninterest expenses were $54.1 million,
which includes the aforementioned $24.0 million goodwill impairment charge. Salaries and employee
benefits were $14.3 million and represented 47.49% of overhead exclusive of the goodwill impairment
charge. Throughout the first half of 2009, the Company hired additional personnel in key
functional areas.
Other overhead costs included other operating expenses of $5.4 million, amortization of
intangibles of $1.7 million, occupancy expenses of $1.9 million, equipment expense of $1.2 million,
data processing fees of $2.2 million, professional fees of $1.3 million, and legal fees of
$772,000.
28
Income Taxes
An income tax benefit of $1.9 million was recorded for the three months ended September 30,
2009, and there was an income tax expense of $3.0 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009. Income tax expenses were $234,000 and $392,000 for the same respective periods in 2008.
This substantial difference is directly attributable to the goodwill impairment charge recorded
during the second quarter of 2009, as this impairment charge did not reduce taxable income.
Asset Quality
The allowance for loan losses represents managements estimate of the amount adequate to
provide for probable losses inherent in the non-FDIC covered loan portfolio. Probable losses in
the covered loans are incorporated in the fair market value analysis for the covered loans and
accordingly impacts the covered loans balance and the FDIC indemnification asset balance, and not
the allowance for loan losses. As such, the following asset quality information separates the
covered loans from the non covered loans.
Total Loans Excluding Covered Loans
The Companys asset quality is continually monitored, and the Companys management has
established an allowance for loan losses that it believes is adequate for the risk of loss inherent
in the loan portfolio. Among other factors, management considers the Companys historical loss
experience, the size and composition of the loan portfolio, the value and adequacy of collateral
and guarantors, non-performing credits and current and anticipated economic conditions. There are
additional risks of future loan losses, which cannot be precisely quantified nor attributed to
particular loans or classes of loans. Because those risks include general economic trends, as well
as conditions affecting individual borrowers, the allowance for loan losses is an estimate. The
allowance is also subject to regulatory examinations and determination as to adequacy, which may
take into account such factors as the methodology used to calculate the allowance and size of the
allowance in comparison to peer companies identified by regulatory agencies.
The Company maintains a list of loans that have potential weaknesses that may need special
attention. This nonperforming loan list is used to monitor such loans and is used in the
determination of the adequacy of the Companys allowance for loan losses. At September 30, 2009,
nonperforming assets, excluding FDIC covered assets, totaled $23.2 million compared with $25.9
million and $5.2 million at June 30, 2009, and December 31, 2008, respectively. The Company
experienced a large increase in nonperforming loans during the second quarter of 2009, which was
attributable to two credit relationships aggregating approximately $11.0 million being placed in
nonaccrual status. These two borrowers had been considered for loan loss reserve adequacy
calculations. During the third quarter of 2009, nonperforming assets declined $2.7 million. Loan
charge-offs represented $1.4 million of this decline, and the remaining portion was attributable to
the disposition of other real estate owned (OREO) during the quarter. Excluding FDIC covered
loans, net charge-offs were $1.2 million and $2.0 million for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, respectively.
At September 30, 2009, nonaccrual loans, excluding FDIC covered assets, were $20.6 million or
3.61% of total loans. Total nonaccrual loans at the Banks Maryland operations aggregated $66.0
million or 76.23% of the total nonaccrual loans for the Bank. OREO equaled $1.2 million,
excluding OREO in the Maryland operations of $16.8 million.
Nationally, industry concerns over asset quality have increased due in large part to issues
related to subprime mortgage lending, declining real estate activity and general economic concerns.
While the Company has experienced reduced residential real estate activity, the markets in which
the Company operates indicate a weakened economic condition. While the Company incurred
appropriate provisions for loan losses and thus an adequate level of allowance for loan losses,
there has been continued deterioration in the quality of the loan portfolio. Residential loan
demand has moderated somewhat, but the Company is still experiencing continued loan demand,
particularly in commercial real estate. Management will continue to monitor delinquencies, risk
rating changes, charge-offs, market trends and other indicators of risk in the Companys portfolio,
particularly those tied to residential real estate, and adjust the allowance for loan losses
accordingly.
The following table sets forth selected asset quality data, excluding FDIC covered
assets, and ratios for the dates indicated:
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
$ |
20,572 |
|
|
$ |
4,534 |
|
Loans past due over 90 days |
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
1,175 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
23,209 |
|
|
$ |
5,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
16,211 |
|
|
$ |
6,939 |
|
Average loans during quarter, net of unearned income |
|
$ |
559,547 |
|
|
$ |
511,042 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income |
|
$ |
569,452 |
|
|
$ |
523,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to loans |
|
|
2.85 |
% |
|
|
1.33 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming assets |
|
|
69.85 |
% |
|
|
134.63 |
% |
Nonperforming assets to loans & other real estate |
|
|
4.07 |
% |
|
|
0.98 |
% |
Net charge-offs for quarter to average loans, annualized |
|
|
0.86 |
% |
|
|
0.32 |
% |
A further breakout of nonaccrual loans, excluding covered loans, at September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 is below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
Amount |
|
Non |
|
Percentage of |
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
of Non |
|
Covered |
|
Non Covered |
|
of Non |
|
Non Covered |
|
Non Covered |
|
|
Accrual |
|
Loans |
|
Loans |
|
Accrual |
|
Loans |
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
Open End 1-4 Family Loans |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20,075 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
$ |
276 |
|
|
$ |
30,323 |
|
|
|
0.91 |
% |
1-4 Family First Liens |
|
|
2,020 |
|
|
|
108,380 |
|
|
|
1.86 |
% |
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
99,284 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total residential 1-4 family |
|
|
2,020 |
|
|
|
128,455 |
|
|
|
1.57 |
% |
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
129,607 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owner occupied nonfarm nonresidential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,423 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
63,218 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
% |
Non owner occupied nonfarm nonresidential |
|
|
4,413 |
|
|
|
111,768 |
|
|
|
3.95 |
% |
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
93,872 |
|
|
|
0.62 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
4,413 |
|
|
|
155,191 |
|
|
|
2.84 |
% |
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
157,090 |
|
|
|
0.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-4 Family Construction |
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
50,842 |
|
|
|
1.68 |
% |
|
|
1,194 |
|
|
|
36,277 |
|
|
|
3.29 |
% |
Other construction and land dev. |
|
|
12,687 |
|
|
|
131,902 |
|
|
|
9.62 |
% |
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
103,238 |
|
|
|
0.45 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total construction |
|
|
13,542 |
|
|
|
182,744 |
|
|
|
7.41 |
% |
|
|
1,655 |
|
|
|
139,515 |
|
|
|
1.19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second mortgages |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
14,051 |
|
|
|
1.42 |
% |
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
15,599 |
|
|
|
3.19 |
% |
Multifamily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,757 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,370 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Agriculture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,907 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
5,143 |
|
|
|
8.42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate loans |
|
|
20,174 |
|
|
|
495,105 |
|
|
|
4.07 |
% |
|
|
3,961 |
|
|
|
456,324 |
|
|
|
0.87 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agriculture loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,407 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
988 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
45,348 |
|
|
|
0.43 |
% |
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
44,332 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial loans |
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
46,755 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
% |
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
45,320 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total revolving credit and other consumer |
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
15,977 |
|
|
|
1.28 |
% |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
14,457 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
% |
All other loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,700 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
7,005 |
|
|
|
4.63 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loans |
|
$ |
20,572 |
|
|
$ |
569,537 |
|
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
$ |
4,534 |
|
|
$ |
523,106 |
|
|
|
0.87 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
30
See Note 10 to the unaudited consolidated financial statements for information related to the
allowance for loan losses. At September 30, 2009, total impaired loans equaled $123.5 million,
excluding FDIC covered assets.
Covered Loans
Under the shared-loss agreements, the FDIC will reimburse the Bank for 80% of losses arising
from covered loan assets, on the first $118 million of all losses on such covered loans, and for
95% of losses on covered loans thereafter. Under the shared-loss agreements, a loss on a covered
loan is defined generally as a realized loss incurred through a permitted disposition, foreclosure,
short-sale or restructuring of the covered asset. As described below, the reimbursements for losses
on single family one-to-four residential mortgage loans are to be made monthly until the end of the
month in which the 10th anniversary of the closing of the Transaction occurs, and the
reimbursements for losses on other loans are to be made quarterly until the end of the quarter in
which the fifth anniversary of the closing of the Transaction occurs. The shared-loss agreements
provide for indemnification from the first dollar of losses without any threshold requirement. The
reimbursable losses from the FDIC are based on the book value of the relevant loan as determined by
the FDIC at the date of the Transaction, January 30, 2009. New loans made after that date are not
covered by the shared-loss agreements.
The following table delineates the volume of covered assets that were nonperforming at
September 30, 2009, related to the acquisition of SFSB in Maryland, which are FDIC covered assets
under the shared-loss agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Non Performing Assets |
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
$ |
65,990 |
|
|
|
76.23 |
% |
Loans past due over 90 days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
Other real estate owned |
|
|
16,823 |
|
|
|
93.47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
82,813 |
|
|
|
78.11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Delinquencies
The following table presents a summary of total performing loans, including covered loans,
greater than 30 days and less than 90 days past due at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
30-89 Days Past Due |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Covered |
|
$ |
13,324 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Non-covered |
|
|
6,257 |
|
|
|
15,191 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
19,581 |
|
|
$ |
15,191 |
|
|
|
|
Percent of Total Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covered |
|
|
5.44 |
% |
|
NA |
|
Non-covered |
|
|
1.10 |
% |
|
|
2.90 |
% |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2.40 |
% |
|
|
2.90 |
% |
|
|
|
Capital Requirements
The determination of capital adequacy depends upon a number of factors, such as asset quality,
liquidity, earnings, growth trends and economic conditions. The Company seeks to maintain a strong
capital base to support its growth and expansion plans, provide stability to current operations and
promote public confidence in the Company.
The federal banking regulators have defined three tests for assessing the capital strength and
adequacy of banks, based on two definitions of capital. Tier 1 Capital is defined as a
combination of common and qualifying preferred stockholders equity less
goodwill. Tier 2 Capital is defined as qualifying subordinated debt and a portion of the
allowance for loan losses. Total Capital is defined as Tier 1 Capital plus Tier 2 Capital.
31
Three risk-based capital ratios are computed using the above capital definitions, total assets
and risk-weighted assets and are measured against regulatory minimums to ascertain adequacy. All
assets and off-balance sheet risk items are grouped into categories according to degree of risk and
assigned a risk-weighting and the resulting total is risk-weighted assets. Tier 1 Risk-based
Capital is Tier 1 Capital divided by risk-weighted assets. Total Risk-based Capital is Total
Capital divided by risk-weighted assets. The Leverage ratio is Tier 1 Capital divided by total
average assets.
At September 30, 2009, the Companys ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets was
18.48%. The ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets was 17.27%, and the leverage ratio
(Tier 1 capital to average adjusted total assets) was 9.23%. All three ratios exceed capital
adequacy guidelines outlined by its regulator, and the Company is considered well-capitalized. At
December 31, 2008, the Companys ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets was 20.00%. The
ratio of Tier 1 Capital to risk-weighted assets was 18.92%, and the leverage ratio (Tier 1 capital
to average adjusted total assets) was 12.54%. The Company has trust preferred subordinated debt
that qualifies as regulatory capital. This trust preferred debt has a 30-year maturity with a
5-year call option, and was issued at a rate of three month LIBOR plus 3.00%, and was priced at
3.60% in the third quarter of 2009.
Liquidity
Liquidity represents the Companys ability to meet present and future financial obligations
through either the sale or maturity of existing assets or the acquisition of additional funds
through liability management. Liquid assets include cash, interest-bearing deposits with banks,
federal funds sold, and certain investment securities. As a result of the Companys management of
liquid assets and the ability to generate liquidity through liability funding, management believes
that the Company maintains overall liquidity sufficient to satisfy its depositors requirements and
meet its customers credit needs.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal
course of business to meet the financing needs of its clients and to reduce its own exposure to
fluctuations in interest rates. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit
and standby letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit
and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet. The contract or
notional amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Company has in
particular classes of financial instruments.
The Companys exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the
financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented
by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making
commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.
32
Supplemental Information on Predecessors
The following information represents a discussion and analysis of the results of operations of
each of the Companys predecessors for the five months ended May 31, 2008.
BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc. (BOE)
Results of Operations
For the five months ended May 31, 2008, net losses were $0.35 million or $0.29 per share. The
loss incurred was primarily the result of one-time noninterest expenses related to the May 31, 2008
acquisition by the Company.
Net interest income was $4.0 million for the five months ended May 31, 2008. Net interest
margin was 3.62%
For the five months ended May 31, 2008, the Companys provision for loan losses was $0.2
million. Increases were made to the loan loss reserve due to general seasoning of the portfolio.
For the five months ended May 31, 2008, noninterest income was $0.86 million. Included in
noninterest income for the five months ended May 31, 2008 is $92,000 loss on sale of other real
estate.
For the five months ended May 31, 2008, noninterest expenses were $4.9 million. Salaries and
employee benefits were $2.5 million and represented 50.97% of all noninterest expenses for the
quarter. Other overhead costs included other operating expenses of $872,000, occupancy expenses
of $216,000, equipment expense of $286,000, data processing fees of $394,000, legal fees of
$306,000, and professional fees of $258,000. One-time noninterest expenses related to the May 31,
2008 acquisition by the Company included $375,000 in salaries and benefits, $160,000 in
professional fees, $84,000 in legal fees, $54,000 in equipment expenses, and $167,000 in data
processing expenses.
An income tax expense of $0.15 million was recorded for the five months ended May 31, 2008.
TransCommunity Financial Corporation (TFC)
Results of Operations
For the five months ended May 31, 2008, net losses were $5.11 million or $1.11 per share. The
loss incurred was primarily the result of one-time noninterest expenses related to the May 31, 2008
acquisition by the Company as well as an increase in the provision for loan losses.
Net interest income was $3.8 million for the five months ended May 31, 2008. Net interest
margin was 3.86%
For the five months ended May 31, 2008, the Companys provision for loan losses was $1.3
million. The increase in loan loss reserves was due to a combination of the provisions required to
support loan growth, plus downgraded loans and seasoning of the loan portfolio.
For the five months ended May 31, 2008, noninterest income was $0.42 million.
For the five months ended May 31, 2008, noninterest expenses were $8.2 million. Salaries and
employee benefits were $3.7 million and represented 44.85% of all noninterest expenses for the
quarter. Other overhead costs included other operating expenses of $793,000, occupancy expenses
of $318,000, equipment expense of $228,000, data processing fees of $2.0 million, legal fees of
$106,000, and professional fees of $1.0 million. One-time noninterest expenses related to the May
31, 2008 acquisition by the Company included $1.3 million in salaries and benefits related to
severance and bonuses, $1.7 million in data processing resulting from the termination of a data
processing contract and $1.0 million in professional fees.
An income tax benefit of $0.24 million was recorded for the five months ended May 31, 2008.
33
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Market risk is the risk of loss in a financial instrument arising from adverse changes in
market rates or prices such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices
and equity prices. The Companys primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk. The ongoing
monitoring and management of interest rate risk is an important component of the Companys
asset/liability management process, which is governed by policies established by its Board of
Directors that are reviewed and approved annually. The Board of Directors delegates responsibility
for carrying out asset/liability management policies to the Asset/Liability Committee (ALCO) of
the Bank. In this capacity, ALCO develops guidelines and strategies that govern the Companys
asset/liability management related activities, based upon estimated market risk sensitivity, policy
limits and overall market interest rate levels and trends.
Interest rate risk represents the sensitivity of earnings to changes in market interest rates.
As interest rates change, the interest income and expense streams associated with the Companys
financial instruments also change, affecting net interest income, the primary component of the
Companys earnings. ALCO uses the results of a detailed and dynamic simulation model to quantify
the estimated exposure of net interest income to sustained interest rate changes. While ALCO
routinely monitors simulated net interest income sensitivity over various periods, it also employs
additional tools to monitor potential longer-term interest rate risk.
The simulation model captures the impact of changing interest rates on the interest income
received and interest expense paid on all assets and liabilities reflected on the Companys balance
sheet. The simulation model is prepared and updated monthly. This sensitivity analysis is compared
to ALCO policy limits, which specify a maximum tolerance level for net interest income exposure
over a one-year horizon, assuming no balance sheet growth, given a 200 basis point upward shift and
a 200 basis point downward shift in interest rates. A parallel shift in rates over a 12-month
period is assumed. The following table represents the change to net interest income given interest
rate shocks up and down 100 and 200 basis points at September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change In Net Interest Income |
(dollars in thousands) |
|
% |
|
$ |
Interest Rate Shock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+200 basis points |
|
|
-2.74 |
% |
|
|
(1,186 |
) |
+100 basis points |
|
|
-1.95 |
% |
|
|
(842 |
) |
No change |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
-100 basis points |
|
|
3.31 |
% |
|
|
1,431 |
|
-200 basis points |
|
|
7.69 |
% |
|
|
3,325 |
|
At September 30, 2009, the Companys interest rate risk model indicated that, in a rising
rate environment of 200 basis points over a 12 month period, net interest income could decrease by
2.74%. For the same time period, the interest rate risk model indicated that
in a declining rate environment of 200 basis points, net interest income could increase by
7.69%. While these percentages are subjective based upon assumptions used within the model,
management believes the balance sheet is appropriately balanced with acceptable risk to changes in
interest rates.
The preceding sensitivity analysis does not represent a forecast and should not be relied upon
as being indicative of expected operating results. These hypothetical estimates are based upon
numerous assumptions, including the nature and timing of interest rate levels such as yield curve
shape, prepayments on loans and securities, deposit decay rates, pricing decisions on loans and
deposits, reinvestment or replacement of asset and liability cash flows. While assumptions are
developed based upon current economic and local market conditions, the Company cannot make any
assurances about the predictive nature of these assumptions, including how customer preferences or
competitor influences might change.
34
Also, as market conditions vary from those assumed in the sensitivity analysis, actual results
will also differ due to factors such as prepayment and refinancing levels likely deviating from
those assumed, the varying impact of interest rate change, caps or floors on adjustable rate
assets, the potential effect of changing debt service levels on customers with adjustable rate
loans, depositor early withdrawals and product preference changes, and other internal and external
variables. Furthermore, the sensitivity analysis does not reflect actions that ALCO might take in
response to, or in anticipation of, changes in interest rates.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
At the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q, the Companys management, with the
participation of the Companys chief executive officer and chief financial officer, conducted an
evaluation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures. As defined under Section 13a-15(e)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), the term disclosure
controls and procedures means controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or
submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time
periods specified in the Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include,
without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is
accumulated and communicated to the issuers management to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosures.
Based on this evaluation, the Companys chief executive officer and chief financial officer
have concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure
that material information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported by management of the
Company on a timely basis in order to comply with the Companys disclosure obligations under the
Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. Two issues that these officers
have identified in making this conclusion at the end of the third quarter of 2009 are the
determination that the Companys financial and accounting department has not effectively documented
and assessed accounting issues related to non-routine transactions, such as mergers and
non-recurring items that the Company has had to evaluate since May 2008, and the determination that
the Companys financial and accounting department is understaffed. This conclusion is the same
conclusion that these officers made as of June 30, 2009, as disclosed in its Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009.
Additional information with respect to these issues is included in the discussion below.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting. The Companys internal control over financial reporting
is a process designed under the supervision of the Companys chief executive officer and chief
financial officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of the Companys financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. In the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008, managements assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys internal control
over financial reporting cited a material weakness regarding the accounting for non-routine
transactions, as described below. While management is not required to re-assess the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal year, the Company has concluded that
this material weakness continues to exist as of September 30, 2009. Specifically, the Companys
financial and accounting department has lacked sufficient resources and expertise to properly
account for certain non-routine transactions, the Companys
35
policies and procedures have not
provided for timely review of significant non-routine transactions and related accounting entries
and the Company has not maintained sufficient documentation related to the application of GAAP to
significant non-routine transactions.
A material weakness is a significant deficiency (as defined in the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Boards Auditing Standard No. 5), or combination of deficiencies, such that there is a
reasonable possibility that a material misstatement in the annual or interim financial statements
will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of their
work. The Company believes that a material weakness regarding the accounting for non-routine
transactions remains as of September 30, 2009, in light of the uncertainty with respect to
accounting issues related to the Companys accounting for subsidiary costs that were applied in the
Companys mergers with TFC and BOE, the public correction of the Companys preliminary earnings
release for the second quarter of 2009 to make certain adjustments relating to the tax effect of
its goodwill impairment charge, and the need to amend past
periodic reports to include financial statements and related information with respect to each
of the Companys predecessors (TFC and BOE) and otherwise enhance disclosure relating to goodwill
and intangible assets, fair value measurements, FDIC-covered assets and asset quality in response
to a comment letter from the staff of the Commission.
As of the date of the filing of this report, the Company has not identified any specific
issues that could result in a restatement of past financial information, notwithstanding the
amended filings that the Company will file in response to the Commissions comments to include
additional and enhanced financial disclosures, as described above. The Company acknowledges,
however, that its financial and accounting documentation for non-routine transactions is less than
satisfactory for the criteria required for the framework for effective internal control over
financial reporting.
In addition, the Companys financial and accounting department is currently understaffed for
the responsibilities that it has had in recent fiscal quarters. While the Company has a chief
financial officer and a chief accounting officer, the Bank has not had a controller since April
2009. The Companys financial and accounting department has also had to evaluate numerous
non-routine accounting issues in addition to focusing on the day-to-day fiscal operations of the
Company and periodic filings with the Commission. For example, the Company acquired the operations
of SFSB in January 2009, and the on-going consolidation of those operations and analysis of
unprecedented accounting issues relating to shared-loss agreements with the FDIC have strained the
resources presently available at the Company.
While acknowledging the existence of a material weakness and the specific issues associated
with it, the Company believes that the Companys financial and accounting department performs its
responsibilities with respect to the completion of accurate financial information in its periodic
filings with the Commission.
In addition, the Company, formerly a special purpose acquisition company, and its wholly-owned
operating subsidiary, Essex Bank (the Bank), have grown substantially over the past 18 months.
In May 2008, the Company merged with each of BOE, the holding company for the Bank, and TFC, the
holding company for TransCommunity Bank, and, in July 2008,
36
TransCommunity Bank merged into the
Bank. In November 2008, the Bank acquired certain assets and assumed all deposit liabilities of
TCB and, in January 2009, the Bank acquired certain assets and assumed all deposit liabilities of
SFSB. This significant growth has put considerable strain on the Companys organizational
structure and the effectiveness of risk management programs that are appropriate for the various
functions of an organization of the Companys size and complexity. Furthermore, this growth has
strained the Companys control structure, including the structure that supports the effective
application of policies and the execution of procedures within the operation of financial reporting
controls.
The Company believes that it has identified the risk management and related issues that it
needs to address, including the items described above that have impacted the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Remediation Steps to Address Material Weakness
To address the issues described above, the Company continues to take appropriate remediation
steps. The Company is evaluating its financial accounting staff levels and expertise and is
implementing appropriate oversight and review procedures. The Company also has put in place
internal remediation plans that address concerns that have arisen in maintaining the effectiveness
of the Companys risk management programs.
The Company engaged a public accounting firm to serve as its internal auditing firm beginning
in April 2009. The Company created a new chief internal auditor position and hired in June 2009 a
chief internal auditor who reports directly to the Companys Audit Committee, and the Company
continues to recruit actively a bank controller. The Company has also hired additional key members
of management, including a chief administrative officer, a chief credit officer and a general
counsel, during the first six months of 2009, and these individuals are actively assisting the
Company in reviewing, assessing and implementing, as appropriate, numerous policies and procedures
applicable to the Company and its operations.
During the third quarter of 2009, the Company engaged an independent consulting firm to
support the Company in its assessment of the Companys quarterly post-closing process, its
assessment of the internal control processes in the Companys financial and accounting department
to ensure that all key controls are identified and that the controls and process are appropriately
documented and provide qualified resources to support the Companys chief financial officer and
chief accounting officer. In addition, the Company engaged an independent accounting firm to
support the Company with the accounting for the loan portfolio in its
Maryland market subject to the FDIC shared-loss agreements.
Also during the third quarter, under the oversight of its Board of Directors and its various
committees, the Company established comprehensive internal remediation plans for issues that it has
identified with respect to its internal audit and Sarbanes-Oxley controls, and each plan has
detailed corrective actions, identifies members of management as responsible parties and sets
completion dates for addressing issues. These plans include the review, adoption and
implementation of numerous formal policies and procedures appropriate for controls of an
organization of the Companys size and complexity. The Company believes that these actions
37
have
positively affected the Companys internal control over financial reporting in the limited time
that they have been implemented and that they will continue to positively affect such controls in
the future.
The Company believes that it is taking all of the necessary corrective actions to the material
weaknesses and other issues described above. As of the date of this filing, the Company
anticipates that it will complete all of its material corrective actions by March 31, 2010.
38
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
There are no material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation
incidental to the Companys business, to which the Company, including its subsidiaries, is a party
or of which the property of the Company is subject.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The Companys operations are subject to many risks that could adversely affect its future
financial condition and performance and, therefore, the market value of its common stock. See
Exhibit 99.1 for information on risk factors that could affect the Companys future financial
condition and performance, and such information is incorporated by reference into this Item 1A.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Chief Executive Officer* |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Chief Financial Officer* |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications* |
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
Risk Factors* |
39
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION
(Registrant)
|
|
|
/s/ George M. Longest, Jr.
|
|
|
George M. Longest, Jr. |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
Date: November 16, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Bruce E. Thomas
|
|
|
Bruce E. Thomas |
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
Date: November 16, 2009
40
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications |
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
Risk Factors |
41