e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
March 31,
2010
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number 0-3134
Park-Ohio Holdings
Corp.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Ohio
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
34-1867219
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
6065 Parkland Boulevard, Cleveland, Ohio
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
44124
(Zip
Code)
|
440/947-2000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. is a successor issuer to Park-Ohio
Industries, Inc.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant:
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports) and
|
|
|
(2)
|
Has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer þ
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
Number of shares outstanding of registrants Common Stock,
par value $1.00 per share, as of April 30, 2010: 11,774,420.
The Exhibit Index is located on page 23.
PARK-OHIO
HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
2
PART I.
Financial Information
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
PARK-OHIO
HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
28,134
|
|
|
$
|
23,098
|
|
Accounts receivable, less allowances for doubtful accounts of
$8,571 at March 31, 2010 and $8,388 at December 31,
2009
|
|
|
120,048
|
|
|
|
104,643
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
173,290
|
|
|
|
182,116
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
8,104
|
|
|
|
8,104
|
|
Unbilled contract revenue
|
|
|
20,570
|
|
|
|
19,411
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
10,529
|
|
|
|
12,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
360,675
|
|
|
|
350,072
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment
|
|
|
245,857
|
|
|
|
245,240
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
172,482
|
|
|
|
168,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,375
|
|
|
|
76,631
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
3,983
|
|
|
|
4,155
|
|
Other
|
|
|
77,224
|
|
|
|
71,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
515,257
|
|
|
$
|
502,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
$
|
86,600
|
|
|
$
|
75,083
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
45,286
|
|
|
|
39,150
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
10,748
|
|
|
|
10,894
|
|
Current portion of other postretirement benefits
|
|
|
2,197
|
|
|
|
2,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
144,831
|
|
|
|
127,324
|
|
Long-Term Liabilities, less current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.375% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014
|
|
|
183,835
|
|
|
|
183,835
|
|
Revolving credit facility
|
|
|
130,400
|
|
|
|
134,600
|
|
Other long-term debt
|
|
|
4,563
|
|
|
|
4,668
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
7,200
|
|
|
|
7,200
|
|
Other postretirement benefits and other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
21,272
|
|
|
|
21,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
347,270
|
|
|
|
352,134
|
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock, par value $1 a share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Serial Preferred Stock
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
13,287
|
|
|
|
13,274
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
66,772
|
|
|
|
66,323
|
|
Retained deficit
|
|
|
(32,164
|
)
|
|
|
(34,230
|
)
|
Treasury stock, at cost
|
|
|
(17,793
|
)
|
|
|
(17,443
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)
|
|
|
(6,946
|
)
|
|
|
(5,114
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,156
|
|
|
|
22,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
515,257
|
|
|
$
|
502,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: |
The balance sheet at December 31, 2009 has been derived
from the audited financial statements at that date, but does not
include all of the information and footnotes required by
generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial
statements.
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
PARK-OHIO
HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands,
|
|
|
|
except per share data)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
191,701
|
|
|
$
|
181,250
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
162,363
|
|
|
|
157,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
29,338
|
|
|
|
23,862
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
20,968
|
|
|
|
22,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
8,370
|
|
|
|
1,241
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
5,436
|
|
|
|
5,971
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
2,934
|
|
|
|
(4,730
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
868
|
|
|
|
732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
2,066
|
|
|
$
|
(5,462
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
.19
|
|
|
$
|
(.50
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
|
$
|
(.50
|
)
|
Common shares used in the computation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
11,108
|
|
|
|
10,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
11,647
|
|
|
|
10,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
PARK-OHIO
HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2010
|
|
$
|
13,274
|
|
|
$
|
66,323
|
|
|
$
|
(34,230
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,443
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,114
|
)
|
|
$
|
22,810
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,066
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,027
|
)
|
|
|
(2,027
|
)
|
Pension and post retirement benefit adjustments, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
Amortization of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
Restricted share units exchanged for restricted stock
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock (36,113 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
13,287
|
|
|
$
|
66,772
|
|
|
$
|
(32,164
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,793
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,946
|
)
|
|
$
|
23,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
PARK-OHIO
HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
2,066
|
|
|
$
|
(5,462
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
(used) by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4,168
|
|
|
|
5,229
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(15,405
|
)
|
|
|
33,042
|
|
Inventories and other current assets
|
|
|
9,838
|
|
|
|
7,436
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
17,653
|
|
|
|
(43,330
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(4,923
|
)
|
|
|
(4,420
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities
|
|
|
13,859
|
|
|
|
(6,991
|
)
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
(217
|
)
|
|
|
(1,335
|
)
|
Purchases of marketable securities
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
Sales of marketable securities
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities
|
|
|
(217
|
)
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Payments) Proceeds on debt, net
|
|
|
(4,450
|
)
|
|
|
3,175
|
|
Debt issue costs
|
|
|
(3,806
|
)
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash (Used) Provided by Financing Activities
|
|
|
(8,606
|
)
|
|
|
3,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
5,036
|
|
|
|
(3,660
|
)
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
|
|
|
23,098
|
|
|
|
17,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
|
|
$
|
28,134
|
|
|
$
|
14,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes paid
|
|
$
|
573
|
|
|
$
|
1,747
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
|
1,167
|
|
|
|
1,541
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
PARK-OHIO
HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
March 31, 2010
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share
data)
|
|
NOTE A
|
Basis of
Presentation
|
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. and its subsidiaries (the
Company). All significant intercompany transactions
have been eliminated in consolidation.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements
have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted for interim financial information and with
the instructions to
Form 10-Q
and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States for complete financial statements. In the
opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation
have been included. Operating results for the three-month period
ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the
results that may be expected for the year ending
December 31, 2010. For further information, refer to the
consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included
in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009.
The Company operates through three segments: Supply
Technologies, Aluminum Products and Manufactured Products.
Supply Technologies provides our customers with Total Supply
Managementtm
services for a broad range of high-volume, specialty production
components. Total Supply
Managementtm
manages the efficiencies of every aspect of supplying production
parts and materials to our customers manufacturing floor,
from strategic planning to program implementation, and includes
such services as engineering and design support, part usage and
cost analysis, supplier selection, quality assurance, bar
coding, product packaging and tracking,
just-in-time
and
point-of-use
delivery, electronic billing services and ongoing technical
support. Aluminum Products manufactures cast aluminum components
for automotive, agricultural equipment, construction equipment,
heavy-duty truck and marine equipment industries. Aluminum
Products also provides value-added services such as design and
engineering, machining and assembly. Manufactured Products
operates a diverse group of niche manufacturing businesses that
design and manufacture a broad range of high quality products
engineered for specific customer applications.
Results by business segment were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supply Technologies
|
|
$
|
94,238
|
|
|
$
|
82,971
|
|
Aluminum Products
|
|
|
36,588
|
|
|
|
22,358
|
|
Manufactured Products
|
|
|
60,875
|
|
|
|
75,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
191,701
|
|
|
$
|
181,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supply Technologies
|
|
$
|
4,484
|
|
|
$
|
546
|
|
Aluminum Products
|
|
|
1,936
|
|
|
|
(3,662
|
)
|
Manufactured Products
|
|
|
4,933
|
|
|
|
7,712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,353
|
|
|
|
4,596
|
|
Corporate costs
|
|
|
(2,983
|
)
|
|
|
(3,355
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(5,436
|
)
|
|
|
(5,971
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,934
|
|
|
$
|
(4,730
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
PARK-OHIO
HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Identifiable assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supply Technologies
|
|
$
|
213,930
|
|
|
$
|
207,729
|
|
Aluminum Products
|
|
|
75,368
|
|
|
|
76,443
|
|
Manufactured Products
|
|
|
178,698
|
|
|
|
178,715
|
|
General corporate
|
|
|
47,261
|
|
|
|
39,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
515,257
|
|
|
$
|
502,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE C
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
|
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued guidance as codified in
ASC 810-10,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
(previously Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 167, Amendments to FASB
Interpretation No. 46(R)). This guidance is intended
to improve financial reporting by providing additional guidance
to companies involved with variable interest entities
(VIEs) and by requiring additional disclosures about
a companys involvement with variable interest entities.
This guidance is generally effective for annual periods
beginning after November 15, 2009 and for interim periods
within that first annual reporting period. The adoption of this
guidance did not have a material impact on the financial
statements of the Company.
The components of inventory consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
$
|
98,306
|
|
|
$
|
100,309
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
24,315
|
|
|
|
26,778
|
|
Raw materials and supplies
|
|
|
50,669
|
|
|
|
55,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
173,290
|
|
|
$
|
182,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE E
|
Shareholders
Equity
|
At March 31, 2010, capital stock consists of
(i) Serial Preferred Stock, of which 632,470 shares
were authorized and none were issued, and (ii) Common
Stock, of which 40,000,000 shares were authorized and
13,287,342 shares were issued, of which 11,777,260 were
outstanding and 1,510,082 were treasury shares.
8
PARK-OHIO
HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
|
|
NOTE F
|
Net
Income (Loss) Per Common Share
|
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
NUMERATOR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
2,066
|
|
|
$
|
(5,462
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DENOMINATOR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic earnings per share weighted
average shares
|
|
|
11,108
|
|
|
|
10,950
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per share weighted
average shares and assumed conversions
|
|
|
11,647
|
|
|
|
10,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
.19
|
|
|
$
|
(.50
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
|
$
|
(.50
|
)
|
Basic earnings per common share is computed as net income
available to common shareholders divided by the weighted average
basic shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per common share is
computed as net income available to common shareholders divided
by the weighted average diluted shares outstanding.
Pursuant to ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, when a
loss is reported, the denominator of diluted earnings per share
cannot be adjusted for the dilutive impact of stock options and
awards because doing so will result in anti-dilution. Therefore,
for the three months ended March 31, 2009, basic
weighted-average shares outstanding are used in calculating
diluted earnings per share.
Outstanding stock options with exercise prices greater than the
average price of the common shares are anti-dilutive and are not
included in the computation of diluted earning per share. Stock
options on 206,685 shares were excluded in the three months
ended March 31, 2010 because they were anti-dilutive.
|
|
NOTE G
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
Total stock-based compensation expense recorded in the first
three months of 2010 and 2009 was $462 and $514, respectively.
There were no stock option or restricted stock awards during the
first three months of 2010. There were an aggregate of 523,000
shares of restricted stock at $3.49 per share and no stock
option awards granted during the three months ended
March 31, 2009. As of March 31, 2010, there was $2,026
of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested
stock-based compensation, which is expected to be recognized
over a weighted average period of 1.7 years.
9
PARK-OHIO
HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
|
|
NOTE H
|
Pension
Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits
|
The components of net periodic benefit cost recognized during
interim periods was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Postretirement Benefits
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Service costs
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
Interest costs
|
|
|
643
|
|
|
|
694
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(1,984
|
)
|
|
|
(1,758
|
)
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
Transition obligation
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
Recognized net actuarial loss
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit (income) costs
|
|
$
|
(1,173
|
)
|
|
$
|
(688
|
)
|
|
$
|
340
|
|
|
$
|
439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During March of 2009, the Company suspended indefinitely its
contribution to its 401(k) defined contribution plan covering
substantially all U.S. employees.
|
|
NOTE I
|
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
2,066
|
|
|
$
|
(5,462
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(2,027
|
)
|
|
|
(3,877
|
)
|
Unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of tax
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
Pension and post retirement benefit adjustments, net of tax
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
(169
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
234
|
|
|
$
|
(9,095
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of accumulated comprehensive loss at
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
$
|
4,923
|
|
|
$
|
6,950
|
|
Pension and postretirement benefit adjustments, net of tax
|
|
|
(11,869
|
)
|
|
|
(12,064
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(6,946
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,114
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The pension and postretirement benefit liability amounts are net
of deferred taxes of $1,179 at March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009. No income taxes are provided on foreign
currency translation adjustments as foreign earnings are
considered permanently invested.
10
PARK-OHIO
HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
|
|
NOTE J
|
Accrued
Warranty Costs
|
The Company estimates the amount of warranty claims on sold
products that may be incurred based on current and historical
data. The actual warranty expense could differ from the
estimates made by the Company based on product performance. The
following table presents the changes in the Companys
product warranty liability:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Balance at January 1
|
|
$
|
2,760
|
|
|
$
|
5,402
|
|
Claims paid during the quarter
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
(660
|
)
|
Additional warranties issued during the quarter
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31
|
|
$
|
2,587
|
|
|
$
|
5,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effective income tax rate in the first three months of 2010
and 2009 was 29.6% and (15.5%), respectively.
There have been no material changes to the balance of
unrecognized tax benefits reported at December 31, 2009.
|
|
NOTE L
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
The Company measures financial assets and liabilities at fair
value in three levels of inputs. The three-tier fair value
hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation
methodologies, is:
Level 1 Valuations based on quoted
prices for identical assets and liabilities in active markets.
Level 2 Valuations based on observable
inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such
as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active
markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and
liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that
are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 Valuations based on unobservable
inputs reflecting our own assumptions, consistent with
reasonably available assumptions made by other market
participants. These valuations require significant judgment.
The fair value of the 8.375% Subordinated Notes due 2014 is
estimated based on a third partys bid price. The fair
value approximated $173,724 at March 31, 2010 and $144,310
at December 31, 2009. The Company had other investments
having Level 2 inputs totaling $7,725.
|
|
NOTE M
|
Financing
Arrangement
|
The Company is a party to a credit and security agreement dated
November 5, 2003, as amended (Credit
Agreement), with a group of banks, under which it may
borrow or issue standby letters of credit or commercial letters
of credit. On March 8, 2010, the Credit Agreement was
amended and restated to, among other things, extend its maturity
date to June 30, 2013 and reduce the loan commitment from
$270,000 to $210,000, which includes a term loan A for $28,000
that is secured by real estate and machinery and equipment and
an unsecured term loan B for $12,000. Amounts borrowed under the
revolving credit facility may be borrowed at either
(i) LIBOR plus 3% to 4% or (ii) the banks prime
lending rate plus 1%, at the Companys election. The
LIBOR-based interest rate is dependent on the Companys
debt service coverage ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement.
Under the Credit Agreement, a detailed borrowing base formula
provides borrowing availability to the Company based on
percentages of eligible accounts receivable and inventory.
Interest on the term loan A is at either (i) LIBOR plus 4%
to 5% or (ii) the banks prime lending rate plus 2%,
at the Companys election. Interest on the term loan B is
at either (i) LIBOR plus 6% to 7% or (ii) the
banks prime lending rate plus 4.5%, at the Companys
election. The term loan A is amortized based on a ten-year
schedule with the balance due at maturity. The term loan B is
amortized over a two-year period, plus 50% of debt service
coverage excess capped at $3,500.
11
PARK-OHIO
HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Long-term debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
8.375% senior subordinated notes due 2014
|
|
$
|
183,835
|
|
|
$
|
183,835
|
|
Revolving credit
|
|
|
97,000
|
|
|
|
101,200
|
|
Term loan A
|
|
|
28,000
|
|
|
|
28,000
|
|
Term loan B
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
Other
|
|
|
8,711
|
|
|
|
8,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329,546
|
|
|
|
333,997
|
|
Less current maturities
|
|
|
10,748
|
|
|
|
10,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
318,798
|
|
|
$
|
323,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE N
|
Accounts
Receivable
|
During the first three months of 2010 and 2009, the Company sold
approximately $6,756 and $5,176, respectively, of accounts
receivable to mitigate accounts receivable concentration risk
and to provide additional financing capacity and recorded a loss
in the amount of $21 and $28, respectively in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations. These losses represented implicit
interest on the transactions.
12
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.
We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. and subsidiaries as of March 31,
2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations and
cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010
and 2009 and the consolidated statement of shareholders
equity for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A
review of interim financial information consists principally of
applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons
responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is
substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an
opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based upon our review, we are not aware of any material
modifications that should be made to the consolidated financial
statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheet of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders
equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, not presented
herein; and in our report dated March 15, 2010, we
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2009, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to
the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
Cleveland, Ohio
May 10, 2010
13
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. and its subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Executive
Overview
We are an industrial Total Supply
Managementtm
and diversified manufacturing business, operating in three
segments: Supply Technologies, Aluminum Products and
Manufactured Products. Our Supply Technologies business provides
our customers with Total Supply
Managementtm,
a proactive solutions approach that manages the efficiencies of
every aspect of supplying production parts and materials to our
customers manufacturing floor, from strategic planning to
program implementation. Total Supply
Managementtm
includes such services as engineering and design support, part
usage and cost analysis, supplier selection, quality assurance,
bar coding, product packaging and tracking,
just-in-time
and
point-of-use
delivery, electronic billing services and ongoing technical
support. The principal customers of Supply Technologies are in
the heavy-duty truck, automotive and vehicle parts, electrical
distribution and controls, consumer electronics, power
sports/fitness equipment, HVAC, agricultural and construction
equipment, semiconductor equipment, plumbing, aerospace and
defense, and appliance industries. Aluminum Products casts and
machines aluminum engine, transmission, brake, suspension and
other components such as pump housings, clutch
retainers/pistons, control arms, knuckles, master cylinders,
pinion housings, brake calipers, oil pans and flywheel spacers
for automotive, agricultural equipment, construction equipment,
heavy-duty truck and marine equipment original equipment
manufacturers (OEMs), primarily on a sole-source
basis. Aluminum Products also provides value-added services such
as design and engineering and assembly. Manufactured Products
operates a diverse group of niche manufacturing businesses that
design and manufacture a broad range of highly-engineered
products including induction heating and melting systems, pipe
threading systems, industrial oven systems, injection molded
rubber components, and forged and machined products.
Manufactured Products also produces and provides services and
spare parts for the equipment it manufactures. The principal
customers of Manufactured Products are OEMs,
sub-assemblers
and end users in the ferrous and non-ferrous metals, silicon,
coatings, forging, foundry, heavy-duty truck, construction
equipment, automotive, oil and gas, rail and locomotive
manufacturing and aerospace and defense industries. Sales,
earnings and other relevant financial data for these three
segments are provided in Note B to the consolidated
financial statements.
On March 8, 2010, we amended our revolving credit facility
to, among other things, extend its maturity to June, 2013 and
reduce the loan commitment from $270.0 million to
$210.0 million, which amount includes the borrowing under a
term loan A for $28.0 million, that is secured by real
estate and machinery and equipment, and an unsecured term loan B
for $12.0 million. See Note M to the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company recorded
$7.0 million of asset impairment charges associated with
general weakness in the economy including the railroad industry.
The charges were composed of $1.8 million of inventory
impairment in Cost of Products Sold and $5.2 million for
impairment of property and equipment.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Our critical accounting policies are described in Item 7.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations, and in the notes to our Consolidated
Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2009
contained in our 2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Any new accounting policies or updates to existing accounting
policies as a result of new accounting pronouncements have been
discussed in the notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements
in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
The application of our critical accounting policies may require
management to make judgments and estimates about the amounts
reflected in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Management
uses historical experience and all available information to make
these estimates and judgments, and different amounts could be
reported using different assumptions and estimates.
14
Results
of Operations
Three
Months 2010 versus Three Months 2009
Net
Sales by Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Supply Technologies
|
|
$
|
94.2
|
|
|
$
|
83.0
|
|
|
$
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
Aluminum Products
|
|
|
36.6
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
63
|
%
|
Manufactured Products
|
|
|
60.9
|
|
|
|
75.9
|
|
|
|
(15.0
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Net Sales
|
|
$
|
191.7
|
|
|
$
|
181.3
|
|
|
$
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales increased $10.4 million to $191.7 million in
the first three months of 2010 compared to $181.3 million
in the same period in 2009 as the Company experienced volume
increases in the Supply Technologies and Aluminum Products
segments. Supply Technologies sales increased 13% primarily due
to volume increases in the semi-conductor, power sports, HVAC,
agricultural and construction equipment industries offset
primarily by declines in the heavy duty truck, lawn and garden
and automotive industries. Aluminum Products sales increased 63%
as volumes increased to customers in the auto industry along
with additional sales from new contracts. Manufactured Products
sales decreased 20% primarily due to the declining business
environment in the capital equipment and forged and machine
business units offset by volume increases in the rubber products
business unit.
Cost
of Products Sold & Gross Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Consolidated cost of products sold
|
|
$
|
162.4
|
|
|
$
|
157.4
|
|
|
$
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated gross profit
|
|
$
|
29.3
|
|
|
$
|
23.9
|
|
|
$
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
15.3
|
%
|
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold increased $5.0 million to
$162.4 million in the first three months of 2010 compared
to $157.4 million in the same period in 2009, while gross
margin increased to 15.3% in the first three months of 2010
compared to 13.1% in the same period in 2009.
Supply Technologies and Aluminum Products gross margin increased
resulting from volume increases. Gross margin in the
Manufactured Products segment decreased primarily from reduced
sales volume.
Selling,
General & Administrative (SG&A)
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Change
|
|
Change
|
|
Consolidated SG&A expenses
|
|
$
|
21.0
|
|
|
$
|
22.6
|
|
|
$
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
SG&A percent
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
|
|
12.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated SG&A expenses decreased 7% in the first three
months of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009, representing
a 150 basis point decrease in SG&A expenses as a
percent of sales. SG&A expenses decreased in the first
three months of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009
primarily due to a reduction in salaries and benefits and by an
increase in pension income.
15
Interest
Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Change
|
|
Change
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
5.4
|
|
|
$
|
6.0
|
|
|
$
|
(.6
|
)
|
|
(10)%
|
Average outstanding borrowings
|
|
$
|
379.2
|
|
|
$
|
381.1
|
|
|
$
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
(1)%
|
Average borrowing rate
|
|
|
5.70
|
%
|
|
|
6.30
|
%
|
|
|
(60
|
) basis points
|
|
|
Interest expense decreased $.6 million in the first three
months of 2010 compared to the same period of 2009, primarily
due to a lower average borrowing rate during the first three
months of 2010. Average borrowings in the first three months of
2010 were slightly lower when compared to the same period in
2009. The lower average borrowing rate in the first three months
of 2010 was due primarily to decreased interest rates under our
revolving credit facility compared to the same period in 2009.
Income
Tax:
The provision for income taxes was $.9 million in the first
three months of 2010, a 30% effective income tax rate, compared
to income taxes of $.7 million provided in the
corresponding period of 2009, a (15)% effective income tax rate.
We estimate that the effective tax rate for full-year 2010 will
be approximately 23%.
Liquidity
and Sources of Capital
Our liquidity needs are primarily for working capital and
capital expenditures. Our primary sources of liquidity have been
funds provided by operations and funds available from existing
bank credit arrangements and the sale of our senior subordinated
notes. In 2003, we entered into a revolving credit facility with
a group of banks which, as subsequently amended, matures at
June 30, 2013 and provides for availability of up to
$170 million subject to an asset-based formula. We have the
option to increase the availability under the revolving loan
portion of the credit facility by $25 million. The
revolving credit facility is secured by substantially all our
assets in the United States and Canada. Borrowings from this
revolving credit facility will be used for general corporate
purposes.
As of March 31, 2010, the Company had $137.0 million
outstanding under the revolving credit facility, and
approximately $35.9 million of unused borrowing
availability.
On March 8, 2010, the revolving credit facility was amended
and restated to, among other things, extend its maturity date to
June 30, 2013, reduce the loan commitment from
$270.0 million to $210.0 million, which amount
includes a term loan A for $28.0 million that is secured by
real estate and machinery and equipment and an unsecured term
loan B for $12.0 million. Amounts borrowed under the
revolving credit facility may be borrowed at either
(i) LIBOR plus 3% to 4% or (ii) the banks prime
lending rate plus 1%, at the Companys election. The
LIBOR-based interest rate is dependent on the Companys
debt service coverage ratio, as defined in the revolving credit
facility. Under the revolving credit facility, a detailed
borrowing base formula provides borrowing availability to the
Company based on percentages of eligible accounts receivable and
inventory. Interest on the term loan A is at either
(i) LIBOR plus 4% to 5% or (ii) the banks prime
lending rate plus 2%, at the Companys election. Interest
on the term loan B is at either (i) LIBOR plus 6% to 7% or
(ii) the banks prime lending rate plus 4.5%, at the
Companys election. The term loan A is amortized based on a
ten-year schedule with the balance due at maturity. The term
loan B is amortized over a two-year period, plus 50% of debt
service coverage excess capped at $3.5 million.
Current financial resources (working capital and available bank
borrowing arrangements) and anticipated funds from operations
are expected to be adequate to meet current cash requirements
for at least the next twelve months. The future availability of
bank borrowings under the revolving loan portion of the credit
facility is based on the Companys ability to meet a debt
service ratio covenant, which could be materially impacted by
negative economic trends. Failure to meet the debt service ratio
could materially impact the availability and interest rate of
future borrowings.
The Company may from time to time seek to retire or purchase its
outstanding debt through cash purchases
and/or
exchanges for equity securities or in open market purchases,
privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. It
16
may also repurchase shares of its outstanding common stock. Such
repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing
market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual
restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be
material.
At March 31, 2010, the Companys debt service coverage
ratio was 2.1, and, therefore, it was in compliance with the
debt service coverage ratio covenant contained in the revolving
credit facility. The Company was also in compliance with the
other covenants contained in the revolving credit facility as of
March 31, 2010. The debt service coverage ratio is
calculated at the end of each fiscal quarter and is based on the
most recently ended four fiscal quarters of consolidated EBITDA
minus cash taxes paid, minus unfunded capital expenditures, plus
cash tax refunds to consolidated debt charges which are
consolidated cash interest expense plus scheduled principal
payments on indebtedness plus scheduled reductions in our term
debt as defined in the revolving credit facility. The debt
service coverage ratio must be greater than 1.0 and not less
than 1.1 for any two consecutive fiscal quarters. While we
expect to remain in compliance throughout 2010, declines in
demand in the automotive industry and in sales volumes in 2010
could adversely impact our ability to remain in compliance with
certain of these financial covenants. Additionally, to the
extent our customers are adversely affected by declines in
demand in the automotive industry or the economy in general,
they may not be able to pay their accounts payable to us on a
timely basis or at all, which would make the accounts receivable
ineligible for purposes of the revolving credit facility and
could reduce our borrowing base and our ability to borrow under
such facility.
The ratio of current assets to current liabilities was 2.49 at
March 31, 2010 versus 2.75 at December 31, 2009.
Working capital decreased by $13.5 million to
$215.8 million at March 31, 2010 from
$222.7 million at December 31, 2009. Accounts
receivable increased $15.4 million to $120.0 million
at March 31, 2010 from $104.6 million in 2009
primarily resulting from sales volume increases. Inventory
decreased by $8.8 million at March 31, 2010 to
$173.3 million from $182.1 million at
December 31, 2009 primarily resulting from planned
reductions and sales volumes increases. Accrued expenses
increased by $6.2 million to $45.3 million at
March 31, 2010 from $39.1 at December 31, 2009
primarily resulting from the terms of the payments of interest
due on the Companys 8.375% Senior Subordinated Notes and
accounts payable increased $11.5 million to
$86.6 million at March 31, 2010 from
$75.1 million at December 31, 2009.
During the first three months of 2010, the Company provided
$13.9 million from operating activities compared to using
$7.0 million in the same period of 2009. The increase in
the operating cash provision of $20.9 million was primarily
the result of net income of $2.1 million in the first three
months of 2010 compared to a net loss of $5.5 million in
the first three months of 2009, (a change of $7.6 million),
a decrease in operating assets and liabilities of
$7.2 million in the first three months of 2010 compared to
an increase of $7.3 million in the first three months of
2009 offset by a reduction of depreciation and amortization
expense of $1.1 million in the first three months of 2010
compared to the first three months of 2009. In the first three
months of 2010, the Company used cash of $.2 million for
capital expenditures. These activities, plus cash interest and
tax payments of $1.7 million, a net reduction in borrowings
of $4.5 million, purchase of treasury stock of
$.4 million and debt issue costs of $3.8 million
resulted in an increase in cash of $5.0 million in the
first three months of 2010.
We do not have off-balance sheet arrangements, financing or
other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other
persons. There are occasions whereupon we enter into forward
contracts on foreign currencies, purely for the purpose of
hedging exposure to changes in the value of accounts receivable
in those currencies against the U.S. dollar. At
March 31, 2010, none were outstanding. We currently have no
other derivative instruments.
Seasonality;
Variability of Operating Results
Our results of operations are typically stronger in the first
six months than the last six months of each calendar year due to
scheduled plant maintenance in the third quarter to coincide
with customer plant shutdowns and due to holidays in the fourth
quarter.
The timing of orders placed by our customers has varied with,
among other factors, orders for customers finished goods,
customer production schedules, competitive conditions and
general economic conditions. The variability of the level and
timing of orders has, from time to time, resulted in significant
periodic and quarterly fluctuations in the operations of our
business units. Such variability is particularly evident at the
capital equipment businesses, included in the Manufactured
Products segment, which typically ship a few large systems per
year.
17
Forward-Looking
Statements
This
Form 10-Q
contains certain statements that are forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. The
words believes, anticipates,
plans, expects, intends,
estimates and similar expressions are intended to
identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking
statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other factors that may cause our actual results, performance and
achievements, or industry results, to be materially different
from any future results, performance or achievements expressed
or implied by such forward-looking statements. These factors
include, but are not limited to the following: our substantial
indebtedness; continuation of the current negative global
economic environment; general business conditions and
competitive factors, including pricing pressures and product
innovation; demand for our products and services; raw material
availability and pricing; component part availability and
pricing; changes in our relationships with customers and
suppliers; the financial condition of our customers, including
the impact of any bankruptcies; our ability to successfully
integrate recent and future acquisitions into existing
operations; changes in general domestic economic conditions such
as inflation rates, interest rates, tax rates, unemployment
rates, higher labor and healthcare costs, recessions and
changing government policies, laws and regulations, including
the uncertainties related to the current global financial
crisis; adverse impacts to us, our suppliers and customers from
acts of terrorism or hostilities; our ability to meet various
covenants, including financial covenants, contained in the
agreements governing our indebtedness; disruptions,
uncertainties or volatility in the credit markets that may limit
our access to capital; increasingly stringent domestic and
foreign governmental regulations, including those affecting the
environment; inherent uncertainties involved in assessing our
potential liability for environmental remediation-related
activities; the outcome of pending and future litigation and
other claims; our dependence on the automotive and heavy-duty
truck industries, which are highly cyclical; the dependence of
the automotive industry on consumer spending, which could be
lower due to the effects of the current financial crisis; our
ability to negotiate contracts with labor unions; dependence on
key management; dependence on information systems; and the other
factors we describe under the Item 1A. Risk
Factors included in the Companys annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009. Any forward-looking
statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is
made, and we undertake no obligation to update any
forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise, except as required by
law. In light of these and other uncertainties, the inclusion of
a forward-looking statement herein should not be regarded as a
representation by us that our plans and objectives will be
achieved.
Review By
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The consolidated financial statements at March 31, 2010,
and for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and
2009, have been reviewed, prior to filing, by Ernst &
Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm,
and their report is included herein.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
|
We are exposed to market risk including changes in interest
rates. We are subject to interest rate risk on borrowings under
our floating rate revolving credit agreement, which consisted of
borrowings of $137.0 million at March 31, 2010. A
100 basis point increase in the interest rate would have
resulted in an increase in interest expense of approximately
$.3 million during the three-month period ended
March 31, 2010.
Our foreign subsidiaries generally conduct business in local
currencies. During the first quarter of 2010, we recorded an
unfavorable foreign currency translation adjustment of
$2.0 million related to net assets located outside the
United States. This foreign currency translation adjustment
resulted primarily from the strengthening of the
U.S. dollar. Our foreign operations are also subject to
other customary risks of operating in a global environment, such
as unstable political situations, the effect of local laws and
taxes, tariff increases and regulations and requirements for
export licenses, the potential imposition of trade or foreign
exchange restrictions and transportation delays.
18
The Company periodically enters into forward contracts on
foreign currencies, primarily the euro and the British Pound
Sterling, purely for the purpose of hedging exposure to changes
in the value of accounts receivable in those currencies against
the U.S. dollar. The Company currently uses no other
derivative instruments. At March 31, 2010, there were no
such currency hedge contracts outstanding.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Under the supervision of and with the participation of our
management, including our chief executive officer and chief
financial officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design
and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15(d)-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
report.
Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief
financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report, our disclosure controls
and procedures were effective.
19
PART II
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
We are subject to various pending and threatened lawsuits in
which claims for monetary damages are asserted in the ordinary
course of business. While any litigation involves an element of
uncertainty, in the opinion of management, liabilities, if any,
arising from currently pending or threatened litigation are not
expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition, liquidity or results of operations.
At March 31, 2010, we were a co-defendant in approximately
290 cases asserting claims on behalf of approximately 1,200
plaintiffs alleging personal injury as a result of exposure to
asbestos. These asbestos cases generally relate to production
and sale of asbestos-containing products and allege various
theories of liability, including negligence, gross negligence
and strict liability and seek compensatory and, in some cases,
punitive damages.
In every asbestos case in which we are named as a party, the
complaints are filed against multiple named defendants. In
substantially all of the asbestos cases, the plaintiffs either
claim damages in excess of a specified amount, typically a
minimum amount sufficient to establish jurisdiction of the court
in which the case was filed (jurisdictional minimums generally
range from $25,000 to $75,000), or do not specify the monetary
damages sought. To the extent that any specific amount of
damages is sought, the amount applies to claims against all
named defendants.
There are only five asbestos cases, involving 25 plaintiffs,
that plead specified damages. In each of the five cases, the
plaintiff is seeking compensatory and punitive damages based on
a variety of potentially alternative causes of action. In three
cases, the plaintiff has alleged compensatory damages in the
amount of $3.0 million for four separate causes of action
and $1.0 million for another cause of action and punitive
damages in the amount of $10.0 million. In the fourth case,
the plaintiff has alleged against each named defendant,
compensatory and punitive damages, each in the amount of
$10.0 million for seven separate causes of action. In the
fifth case, the plaintiff has alleged compensatory damages in
the amount of $20.0 million for three separate causes of
action and $5.0 million for another cause of action and
punitive damages in the amount of $20.0 million.
Historically, we have been dismissed from asbestos cases on the
basis that the plaintiff incorrectly sued one of our
subsidiaries or because the plaintiff failed to identify any
asbestos-containing product manufactured or sold by us or our
subsidiaries. We intend to vigorously defend these asbestos
cases, and believe we will continue to be successful in being
dismissed from such cases. However, it is not possible to
predict the ultimate outcome of asbestos-related lawsuits,
claims and proceedings due to the unpredictable nature of
personal injury litigation. Despite this uncertainty, and
although our results of operations and cash flows for a
particular period could be adversely affected by
asbestos-related lawsuits, claims and proceedings, management
believes that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition,
liquidity or results of operations. Among the factors management
considered in reaching this conclusion were: (a) our
historical success in being dismissed from these types of
lawsuits on the bases mentioned above; (b) many cases have
been improperly filed against one of our subsidiaries;
(c) in many cases, the plaintiffs have been unable to
establish any causal relationship to us or our products or
premises; (d) in many cases, the plaintiffs have been
unable to demonstrate that they have suffered any identifiable
injury or compensable loss at all, that any injuries that they
have incurred did in fact result from alleged exposure to
asbestos; and (e) the complaints assert claims against
multiple defendants and, in most cases, the damages alleged are
not attributed to individual defendants. Additionally, we do not
believe that the amounts claimed in any of the asbestos cases
are meaningful indicators of our potential exposure because the
amounts claimed typically bear no relation to the extent of the
plaintiffs injury, if any.
Our cost of defending these lawsuits has not been material to
date and, based upon available information, our management does
not expect its future costs for asbestos-related lawsuits to
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations,
liquidity or financial position.
20
There have been no material changes in the risk factors
previously disclosed in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
Set forth below is information regarding the Companys
repurchases of its common stock during the first quarter ended
March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Maximum Number of
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Purchased as
|
|
|
Shares That May Yet Be
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Purchased Under the
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Announced Plans(1)
|
|
|
Plans or Program
|
|
|
January 1 January 31, 2010
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
340,920
|
|
February 1 February 28, 2010
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
340,920
|
|
March 1 March 31, 2010
|
|
|
36,113
|
(2)
|
|
|
9.68
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
340,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,113
|
|
|
$
|
9.68
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
340,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In 2006, the Company announced a share repurchase program
whereby the Company may repurchase up to 1.0 million shares
of its common stock. During the first quarter of 2010, no shares
were purchased as part of this program. |
|
(2) |
|
Consist of shares of common stock the Company acquired from
recipients of restricted stock awards at the time of vesting of
such awards in order to settle recipient withholding tax
liabilities. |
The following exhibits are included herein:
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated March 8,
2010, among Park-Ohio Industries, Inc., RB&W Corporation of
Canada, the Ex-Im Borrowers party thereto,the other loan parties
thereto, the lenders party thereto and JP Morgan Chase Bank,
N.A., as Administrative Agent, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Toronto Branch, as Canadian Agent, RBS Business Capital, as
Syndication Agent, KeyBank National Association, as
Co-Documentation Agent, JP Morgan Securities Inc., as Sole Lead
Arranger, PNC Bank, National Association, as Joint Bookrunner
and U.S. Bank National Association, as Co-Documentation Agent
and Joint Bookrunner
|
|
15
|
|
|
Letter re: unaudited interim financial information
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Principal Executive Officers Certification Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Principal Financial Officers Certification Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
|
|
Certification requirement under Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
21
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
By
|
/s/ Jeffrey
L. Rutherford
|
Name: Jeffrey L. Rutherford
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Date: May 10, 2010
22
EXHIBIT INDEX
QUARTERLY REPORT ON
FORM 10-Q
PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated March 8,
2010, among Park-Ohio Industries, Inc., RB&W Corporation of
Canada, the Ex-Im Borrowers party, thereto, the other loan
parties thereto, the lenders party thereto and JP Morgan Chase
Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Toronto Branch, as Canadian Agent, RBS Business Capital, as
Syndication Agent, KeyBank National Association, as
Co-Documentation Agent, JP Morgan Securities Inc., as Sole Lead
Arranger, PNC Bank, National Association, as Joint Bookrunner
and U.S. Bank National Association, as Co-Documentation Agent
and Joint Bookrunner
|
|
15
|
|
|
Letter re: unaudited interim financial information
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Principal Executive Officers Certification Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Principal Financial Officers Certification Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
|
|
Certification requirement under Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
23