e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
for the quarterly period ended: September 30, 2007
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
for the transition period from to .
Commission File Number: 000-25597
Umpqua Holdings Corporation
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
|
|
|
OREGON
|
|
93-1261319 |
|
|
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
of Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
|
One SW Columbia Street, Suite 1200
Portland, Oregon 97258
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)
(503) 727-4100
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
þ Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
o Yes þ No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding for each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practical date:
Common stock, no par value: 59,941,599 shares outstanding as of October 31, 2007
UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
Table of Contents
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited)
UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
148,434 |
|
|
$ |
169,769 |
|
Temporary investments |
|
|
46,787 |
|
|
|
165,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
195,221 |
|
|
|
335,648 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading |
|
|
4,144 |
|
|
|
4,204 |
|
Available for sale, at fair value |
|
|
911,883 |
|
|
|
715,187 |
|
Held to maturity, at amortized cost |
|
|
7,116 |
|
|
|
8,762 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
19,964 |
|
|
|
16,053 |
|
Loans and leases |
|
|
6,079,435 |
|
|
|
5,361,862 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
(88,278 |
) |
|
|
(60,090 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans and leases |
|
|
5,991,157 |
|
|
|
5,301,772 |
|
|
Restricted equity securities |
|
|
15,297 |
|
|
|
15,255 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
107,189 |
|
|
|
101,830 |
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net |
|
|
767,210 |
|
|
|
679,493 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights, net |
|
|
9,474 |
|
|
|
9,952 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
197,156 |
|
|
|
156,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
8,225,811 |
|
|
$ |
7,344,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest bearing |
|
$ |
1,294,334 |
|
|
$ |
1,222,107 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
5,223,883 |
|
|
|
4,618,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
6,518,217 |
|
|
|
5,840,294 |
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
52,883 |
|
|
|
47,985 |
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Term debt |
|
|
75,010 |
|
|
|
9,513 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures, at fair value |
|
|
131,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures, at amortized cost |
|
|
104,947 |
|
|
|
203,688 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
89,580 |
|
|
|
86,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
6,992,621 |
|
|
|
6,188,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; issued and
outstanding: 59,864,335 in 2007 and 58,080,171 in 2006 |
|
|
987,543 |
|
|
|
930,867 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
253,487 |
|
|
|
234,783 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(7,840 |
) |
|
|
(9,439 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
1,233,190 |
|
|
|
1,156,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
8,225,811 |
|
|
$ |
7,344,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
3
UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
INTEREST INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans |
|
$ |
116,111 |
|
|
$ |
106,320 |
|
|
$ |
331,889 |
|
|
$ |
265,444 |
|
Interest and dividends on investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
9,137 |
|
|
|
6,797 |
|
|
|
25,376 |
|
|
|
20,201 |
|
Exempt from federal income tax |
|
|
1,588 |
|
|
|
1,142 |
|
|
|
4,151 |
|
|
|
2,740 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
Interest on temporary investments |
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
2,439 |
|
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
127,861 |
|
|
|
114,738 |
|
|
|
364,104 |
|
|
|
289,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on deposits |
|
|
48,138 |
|
|
|
34,121 |
|
|
|
133,750 |
|
|
|
81,112 |
|
Interest on securities sold under agreements to repurchase
and federal funds purchased |
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
2,155 |
|
|
|
1,757 |
|
|
|
6,346 |
|
Interest on term debt |
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
1,767 |
|
|
|
2,775 |
|
Interest on junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
4,444 |
|
|
|
3,971 |
|
|
|
12,329 |
|
|
|
10,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
53,986 |
|
|
|
40,939 |
|
|
|
149,603 |
|
|
|
100,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
73,875 |
|
|
|
73,799 |
|
|
|
214,501 |
|
|
|
188,835 |
|
PROVISION FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES |
|
|
20,420 |
|
|
|
2,352 |
|
|
|
23,916 |
|
|
|
2,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan
and lease losses |
|
|
53,455 |
|
|
|
71,447 |
|
|
|
190,585 |
|
|
|
186,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-INTEREST INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
8,448 |
|
|
|
7,606 |
|
|
|
23,648 |
|
|
|
19,540 |
|
Brokerage commissions and fees |
|
|
2,498 |
|
|
|
2,506 |
|
|
|
7,594 |
|
|
|
7,408 |
|
Mortgage banking revenue, net |
|
|
1,366 |
|
|
|
1,445 |
|
|
|
5,772 |
|
|
|
5,792 |
|
Net loss on sale of investment securities |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
6,244 |
|
|
|
1,919 |
|
|
|
11,434 |
|
|
|
6,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
|
18,543 |
|
|
|
13,476 |
|
|
|
48,438 |
|
|
|
39,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
28,005 |
|
|
|
26,387 |
|
|
|
85,172 |
|
|
|
71,525 |
|
Net occupancy and equipment |
|
|
9,166 |
|
|
|
8,540 |
|
|
|
26,774 |
|
|
|
22,907 |
|
Communications |
|
|
1,807 |
|
|
|
1,744 |
|
|
|
5,293 |
|
|
|
4,689 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
1,982 |
|
|
|
1,780 |
|
|
|
4,405 |
|
|
|
4,596 |
|
Services |
|
|
4,864 |
|
|
|
4,199 |
|
|
|
14,066 |
|
|
|
11,016 |
|
Supplies |
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
2,572 |
|
|
|
2,276 |
|
Intangible amortization |
|
|
1,767 |
|
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
4,400 |
|
|
|
2,533 |
|
Merger related expenses |
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
2,451 |
|
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
|
4,358 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
4,055 |
|
|
|
3,465 |
|
|
|
10,968 |
|
|
|
9,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
|
52,893 |
|
|
|
50,686 |
|
|
|
156,850 |
|
|
|
132,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
19,105 |
|
|
|
34,237 |
|
|
|
82,173 |
|
|
|
92,983 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
5,928 |
|
|
|
11,381 |
|
|
|
28,421 |
|
|
|
33,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
13,177 |
|
|
$ |
22,856 |
|
|
$ |
53,752 |
|
|
$ |
59,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
4
UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AT JANUARY 1, 2006 |
|
|
44,556,269 |
|
|
$ |
564,579 |
|
|
$ |
183,591 |
|
|
$ |
(9,909 |
) |
|
$ |
738,261 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,447 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on securities arising during the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
84,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,932 |
|
Stock repurchased and retired |
|
|
(6,142 |
) |
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(179 |
) |
Issuances of common stock under stock plans and related
tax benefit |
|
|
784,715 |
|
|
|
10,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,814 |
|
Stock issued in connection with acquisition |
|
|
12,745,329 |
|
|
|
353,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353,721 |
|
Cash dividends ($0.60 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
58,080,171 |
|
|
$ |
930,867 |
|
|
$ |
234,783 |
|
|
$ |
(9,439 |
) |
|
$ |
1,156,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AT JANUARY 1, 2007 |
|
|
58,080,171 |
|
|
$ |
930,867 |
|
|
$ |
234,783 |
|
|
$ |
(9,439 |
) |
|
$ |
1,156,211 |
|
Adoption of fair value option junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,064 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,064 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,752 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on securities arising during the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,599 |
|
|
|
1,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
55,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,596 |
|
Stock repurchased and retired |
|
|
(4,048,387 |
) |
|
|
(96,075 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96,075 |
) |
Issuances of common stock under stock plans and related
tax benefit |
|
|
668,978 |
|
|
|
8,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,043 |
|
Stock issued in connection with acquisition |
|
|
5,163,573 |
|
|
|
142,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,112 |
|
Cash dividends ($0.55 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,984 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,984 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2007 |
|
|
59,864,335 |
|
|
$ |
987,543 |
|
|
$ |
253,487 |
|
|
$ |
(7,840 |
) |
|
$ |
1,233,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
5
UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
13,177 |
|
|
$ |
22,856 |
|
|
$ |
53,752 |
|
|
$ |
59,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains arising during the period on
investment securities available for sale |
|
|
12,425 |
|
|
|
16,008 |
|
|
|
2,665 |
|
|
|
1,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for losses realized in net income,
(net of tax benefit of $5,000 and $4,000 for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007, respectively) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense related to unrealized gains/losses on
investment securities, available for sale |
|
|
(4,978 |
) |
|
|
(6,403 |
) |
|
|
(1,072 |
) |
|
|
(648 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains on investment securities available
for sale |
|
|
7,455 |
|
|
|
9,605 |
|
|
|
1,599 |
|
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
20,632 |
|
|
$ |
32,461 |
|
|
$ |
55,351 |
|
|
$ |
60,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
6
UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
53,752 |
|
|
$ |
59,914 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted equity securities stock dividends |
|
|
(180 |
) |
|
|
(205 |
) |
Amortization of investment premiums, net |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
907 |
|
Loss on sale of investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
23,916 |
|
|
|
2,427 |
|
Depreciation, amortization and accretion |
|
|
9,295 |
|
|
|
8,503 |
|
Change in fair value of mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
(4,531 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
2,596 |
|
|
|
1,563 |
|
Net decrease (increase) in trading account assets |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
Origination of loans held for sale |
|
|
(200,179 |
) |
|
|
(194,856 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale |
|
|
196,521 |
|
|
|
186,873 |
|
Increase in mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
(499 |
) |
|
|
(1,337 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from the exercise of stock options |
|
|
(243 |
) |
|
|
(855 |
) |
Net (increase) decrease in other assets |
|
|
(17,021 |
) |
|
|
23,665 |
|
Net decrease in other liabilities |
|
|
(7,914 |
) |
|
|
(2,068 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
56,712 |
|
|
|
84,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
(219,303 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Sales and maturities of investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
110,517 |
|
|
|
56,303 |
|
Maturities of investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
|
1,628 |
|
|
|
2,237 |
|
Redemption of restricted equity securities |
|
|
5,525 |
|
|
|
9,242 |
|
Net loan and lease originations |
|
|
(300,243 |
) |
|
|
(457,625 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of loans |
|
|
18,442 |
|
|
|
19,129 |
|
Proceeds from disposals of furniture and equipment |
|
|
4,314 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
Purchases of premises and equipment |
|
|
(6,997 |
) |
|
|
(8,196 |
) |
Sales of real estate owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
Cash acquired in merger, net of cash consideration paid |
|
|
78,729 |
|
|
|
36,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
|
(307,388 |
) |
|
|
(341,674 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in deposit liabilities |
|
|
215,245 |
|
|
|
348,851 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in Federal funds purchased |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
(55,000 |
) |
Net increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
4,898 |
|
|
|
6,606 |
|
Term debt borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
Proceeds from the issuance of junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
(36,084 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repayment of term debt |
|
|
(33,637 |
) |
|
|
(605,087 |
) |
Dividends paid on common stock |
|
|
(32,055 |
) |
|
|
(17,664 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from the exercise of stock options |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
855 |
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised |
|
|
7,714 |
|
|
|
8,936 |
|
Retirement of common stock |
|
|
(96,075 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
110,249 |
|
|
|
287,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(140,427 |
) |
|
|
30,280 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
335,648 |
|
|
|
161,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
195,221 |
|
|
$ |
192,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
148,143 |
|
|
$ |
95,172 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
37,931 |
|
|
$ |
38,808 |
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
7
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accounting and financial reporting policies of Umpqua Holdings Corporation (referred to in this
report as we, our or the Company) conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Umpqua Bank (Bank), and Strand,
Atkinson, Williams & York, Inc. (Strand). All material inter-company balances and transactions
have been eliminated. The consolidated financial statements have not been audited. A more detailed
description of our accounting policies is included in the 2006 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K.
There have been no significant changes to these policies, except due to adoption of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and
Extinguishments of Liabilities, SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value
Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, and FASB Interpretation No. (FIN) 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, (FIN 48). The changes to accounting policies under
these standards are described in detail in Notes 3, 4, 7 and 10. These interim condensed
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and
related notes contained in the 2006 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K.
In managements opinion, all accounting adjustments necessary to accurately reflect the financial
position and results of operations on the accompanying financial statements have been made. These
adjustments include normal and recurring accruals considered necessary for a fair and accurate
presentation. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the
full year or any other interim period. Certain reclassifications of prior period amounts have been
made to conform to current classifications.
Note 2 Business Combinations
On April 26, 2007, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of North Bay Bancorp
(North Bay) and its principal operating subsidiary, The Vintage Bank, along with its Solano Bank
division. The results of North Bays operations have been included in the consolidated financial
statements since that date. This acquisition added North Bays network of 10 Northern California
branches, including locations in the Napa area and in the communities of St. Helena, American
Canyon, Vacaville, Benicia, Vallejo and Fairfield, to our network of Northern California, Oregon
and Washington locations. This merger was consistent with the Companys community banking
expansion strategy and provided further opportunity to enter growth markets in Northern California.
The aggregate purchase price was $143.4 million and included 5.2 million common shares valued at
$135.2 million, options to purchase 542,000 shares of common stock valued at $6.9 million and $1.1
million of direct merger costs. North Bay shareholders received 1.228 shares of the Companys
common stock for each share of North Bay common stock (exchange ratio of 1.228:1). The value of
the common shares issued was $26.18 per share based on the average closing market price of the
Companys common stock for the fifteen trading days before the last five trading days before the
merger. Outstanding North Bay stock options were converted (using the exchange ratio of 1.228:1) at
a weighted average fair value of $12.78 per option.
The following table summarizes the purchase price allocation, including the estimated fair value of
the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition. Additional adjustments to
the purchase price allocation may be required, specifically related to other assets, taxes and
compensation adjustments.
8
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 26, 2007 |
|
Assets Acquired: |
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
78,729 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
85,589 |
|
Loans, net |
|
|
437,863 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
12,940 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
14,210 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
78,794 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
19,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
$ |
727,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities Assumed: |
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
462,624 |
|
Term debt |
|
|
99,227 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
10,342 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
13,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
|
585,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Acquired |
|
$ |
142,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
The intangible assets represent the value ascribed to the long-term deposit relationships and
merchant services portfolio income stream acquired. These intangible assets are being amortized on
an accelerated basis over a weighted average estimated useful life of ten to fifteen years. The
intangible assets are estimated not to have a significant residual value. Goodwill represents the
excess of the total purchase price paid for North Bay over the fair values of the assets acquired,
net of the fair values of liabilities assumed. Goodwill has been assigned to our Community Banking
segment. Goodwill is not amortized, but is evaluated for possible impairment at least annually and
more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. No
impairment losses were recognized in connection with intangible or goodwill assets during the
period from acquisition to September 30, 2007. At September 30, 2007, goodwill recorded in
connection with the North Bay acquisition was $77.2 million. The $1.6 million decrease from April
26, 2007 is primarily due to the recognition of a tax benefit upon exercise of fully vested
acquired options.
The following table presents unaudited pro forma results of operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, and three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 as if the acquisition of
North Bay had occurred on January 1, 2006. Any cost savings realized as a result of the North Bay
merger are not reflected in the pro forma consolidated condensed statements of income. The pro
forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative
of the results that would have been obtained had the acquisition actually occurred on January 1,
2006:
9
Pro Forma Financial Information Unaudited
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
North |
|
Pro Forma |
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
Umpqua |
|
Bay (a) |
|
Adjustments |
|
Combined |
Net interest income |
|
$ |
214,501 |
|
|
$ |
8,732 |
|
|
$ |
462 |
(b) |
|
$ |
223,695 |
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
23,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,916 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
48,438 |
|
|
|
1,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,872 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
156,850 |
|
|
|
6,985 |
|
|
|
(2,932 |
)(c) |
|
|
160,903 |
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
82,173 |
|
|
|
3,181 |
|
|
|
3,394 |
|
|
|
88,748 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
28,421 |
|
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
1,358 |
(d) |
|
|
30,833 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
53,752 |
|
|
$ |
2,127 |
|
|
$ |
2,036 |
|
|
$ |
57,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
59,790 |
|
|
|
1,772 |
|
|
|
404 |
(e) |
|
|
61,966 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
60,450 |
|
|
|
1,839 |
|
|
|
419 |
(e) |
|
|
62,708 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
North Bay amounts represent results from January 1, 2007 to acquisition date of April 26, 2007. |
|
(b) |
|
Consists of additional net accretion of fair value adjustments related to the North Bay acquisition. |
|
(c) |
|
Consists of merger related expenses of $3.2 million at Umpqua, adjusted for amortization of
intangible assets and premises purchase accounting adjustment related to the North Bay acquisition. |
|
(d) |
|
Income tax effect of pro forma adjustments at 40%. |
|
(e) |
|
Additional shares issued at an exchange ratio of 1.228:1. |
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
North |
|
Pro Forma |
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
Umpqua |
|
Bay |
|
Adjustments |
|
Combined |
Net interest income |
|
$ |
73,799 |
|
|
$ |
6,956 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
(a) |
|
$ |
80,757 |
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
2,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,352 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
13,476 |
|
|
|
1,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,715 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
50,686 |
|
|
|
5,388 |
|
|
|
600 |
(b) |
|
|
56,674 |
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
34,237 |
|
|
|
2,807 |
|
|
|
(598 |
) |
|
|
36,446 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
11,381 |
|
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
(239 |
) (c) |
|
|
12,073 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
22,856 |
|
|
$ |
1,876 |
|
|
$ |
(359 |
) |
|
$ |
24,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
57,802 |
|
|
|
4,134 |
|
|
|
943 |
(d) |
|
|
62,879 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
58,452 |
|
|
|
4,296 |
|
|
|
979 |
(d) |
|
|
63,727 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Consists of net accretion of fair value adjustments related to the North Bay acquisition. |
|
(b) |
|
Consists of amortization of intangible assets and premises purchase accounting adjustment related to
the North Bay acquisition. |
|
(c) |
|
Income tax effect of pro forma adjustments at 40%. |
|
(d) |
|
Additional shares issued at an exchange ratio of 1.228:1. |
10
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
North |
|
Pro Forma |
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
Umpqua |
|
Bay |
|
Adjustments |
|
Combined |
Net interest income |
|
$ |
188,835 |
|
|
$ |
21,651 |
|
|
$ |
(235 |
)(a) |
|
$ |
210,251 |
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
2,427 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,627 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
39,484 |
|
|
|
3,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,963 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
132,909 |
|
|
|
16,943 |
|
|
|
1,917 |
(b) |
|
|
151,769 |
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
92,983 |
|
|
|
7,987 |
|
|
|
(2,152 |
) |
|
|
98,818 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
33,069 |
|
|
|
2,745 |
|
|
|
(861 |
)(c) |
|
|
34,953 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
59,914 |
|
|
$ |
5,242 |
|
|
$ |
(1,291 |
) |
|
$ |
63,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
50,378 |
|
|
|
4,123 |
|
|
|
940 |
(d) |
|
|
55,441 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
51,010 |
|
|
|
4,284 |
|
|
|
977 |
(d) |
|
|
56,271 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Consists of net accretion of fair value adjustments related to the North Bay acquisition. |
|
(b) |
|
Consists of amortization of intangible assets and premises purchase accounting adjustment related to
the North Bay acquisition. |
|
(c) |
|
Income tax effect of pro forma adjustments at 40%. |
|
(d) |
|
Additional shares issued at an exchange ratio of 1.228:1. |
The
following table summarizes activity in the Companys accrued
restructuring charges, recorded in other liabilities, related to the North Bay acquisition from acquisition date
of April 26, 2007 to September 30, 2007:
Accrued Restructuring Charges
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
2,796 |
|
Utilization: |
|
|
|
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(1,267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance |
|
$ |
1,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company expects additional merger-related expenses incurred in connection with the North Bay
acquisition to be insignificant.
On June 2, 2006, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Western Sierra Bancorp
(Western Sierra) of Cameron Park, California, and its principal operating subsidiaries, Western
Sierra Bank, Central California Bank, Lake Community Bank and Auburn Community Bank. The results
of Western Sierras operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements since
that date. This acquisition added Western Sierras complete network of 31 Northern California
branches, including locations in the Sacramento, Auburn, Lakeport and Sonora areas, to our network
of California, Oregon and Washington locations. This merger was consistent with the Companys
community banking expansion strategy and provided further opportunity to enter growth markets in
Northern California.
The aggregate purchase price was $353.7 million and included 12.7 million common shares valued at
$343.0 million, and 723,000 stock options valued at $10.7 million. Western Sierra shareholders
received 1.61 shares of the Companys common stock for each share of Western Sierra common stock
(exchange ratio of 1.61:1). The value of the common shares issued was determined as $26.91 per
share based on the average closing market price of the Companys common stock for the two trading
days before and after the last trading day before public announcement of the merger. Outstanding
Western Sierra stock options were converted (using the exchange ratio of 1.61:1) at a weighted
average fair value of $14.80 per option.
The following table summarizes the purchase price allocation, including the estimated fair value of
the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition. Additional adjustments to
the purchase price allocation may be required, specifically related to taxes.
11
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 2, 2006 |
|
Assets Acquired: |
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
36,978 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
76,229 |
|
Loans, net |
|
|
1,009,860 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
10,109 |
|
Core deposit intangible asset |
|
|
27,624 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
247,799 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
83,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
$ |
1,492,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities Assumed: |
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
1,016,053 |
|
Term debt |
|
|
59,030 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
38,746 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
24,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
|
1,138,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Acquired |
|
$ |
353,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
The core deposit intangible asset represents the value ascribed to the long-term deposit
relationships acquired. This intangible asset is being amortized on a straight-line basis over a
weighted average estimated useful life of ten years. The core deposit intangible asset is
estimated not to have a significant residual value. Goodwill represents the excess of the total
purchase price paid for Western Sierra over the fair values of the assets acquired, net of the fair
values of liabilities assumed. Goodwill has been assigned to our Community Banking segment.
Goodwill is not amortized, but is evaluated for possible impairment at least annually and more
frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. No impairment
losses were recognized in connection with core deposit intangible or goodwill assets during the
period from acquisition to September 30, 2007. At September 30, 2007, goodwill recorded in
connection with the Western Sierra acquisition was $247.9 million.
The following table presents unaudited pro forma results of operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 as if the acquisition of Western Sierra had occurred on January 1, 2006. Any
cost savings realized as a result of the Western Sierra merger are not reflected in the pro forma
consolidated condensed statements of income. The pro forma results have been prepared for
comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have been
obtained had the acquisition actually occurred on January 1,
2006:
12
Pro Forma Financial Information Unaudited
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western |
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
|
Umpqua |
|
|
Sierra (a) |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Combined |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
188,835 |
|
|
$ |
25,834 |
|
|
$ |
(99 |
)(b) |
|
$ |
214,570 |
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
2,427 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,777 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
39,484 |
|
|
|
5,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,524 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
132,909 |
|
|
|
18,168 |
|
|
|
(3,270 |
)(c) |
|
|
147,807 |
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
92,983 |
|
|
|
12,356 |
|
|
|
3,171 |
|
|
|
108,510 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
33,069 |
|
|
|
4,898 |
|
|
|
1,268 |
(d) |
|
|
39,235 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
59,914 |
|
|
$ |
7,458 |
|
|
$ |
1,903 |
|
|
$ |
69,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
50,378 |
|
|
|
4,401 |
|
|
|
2,685 |
(e) |
|
|
57,464 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
51,010 |
|
|
|
4,517 |
|
|
|
2,755 |
(e) |
|
|
58,282 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Western Sierra amounts represent results from January 1, 2006 to acquisition date of June 2, 2006. |
|
(b) |
|
Consists of additional net accretion of fair value adjustments related to the Western Sierra acquisition. |
|
(c) |
|
Consists of merger related expenses of $4.4 million, partially offset by additional core deposit intangible amortization
of $1.1 million. |
|
(d) |
|
Income tax effect of pro forma adjustments at 40%. |
|
(e) |
|
Additional shares issued at an exchange ratio of 1.61:1. |
The following table summarizes activity in the Companys accrued restructuring charges related to
the Western Sierra acquisition which are recorded in other liabilities:
Accrued Restructuring Charges
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
4,369 |
|
Additions: |
|
|
|
|
Severance, retention and other compensation |
|
|
217 |
|
Premises |
|
|
1,093 |
|
Utilization: |
|
|
|
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(2,416 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance |
|
$ |
3,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
These accrued restructuring charges will be utilized by May 2012. No additional merger-related
expenses are expected in connection with the Western Sierra or any other acquisition prior to
Western Sierra.
Note 3 Mortgage Servicing Rights
SFAS No. 156, issued in March 2006, requires all separately recognized servicing assets and
liabilities to be initially measured at fair value. In addition, entities are permitted to choose
to either subsequently measure servicing rights at fair value and report changes in fair value in
earnings, or amortize servicing rights in proportion to and over the period of the estimated net
servicing income or loss and assess the rights for impairment. Beginning with the fiscal year in
which an entity adopts SFAS No. 156, it may elect to subsequently measure a class of servicing
assets and liabilities at fair value. The effect of remeasuring an existing class of servicing
assets and liabilities at fair value is to be reported as a cumulative-effect adjustment to
retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. For the Company, this standard
became effective on January 1, 2007.
The Company determines its classes of servicing assets based on the asset type being serviced along
with the methods used to manage the risk inherent in the servicing assets, which includes the
market inputs used to value the servicing assets. The Company elected to measure its residential
mortgage servicing assets at fair value subsequent to adoption. As the retrospective application of
SFAS No.
13
156 is not permitted, there was no change to prior period financial statements. Since there was no
difference between the carrying amount and fair value of the mortgage servicing rights (MSR) on
the date of adoption, there was also no cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings.
Upon the change from the lower of cost or fair value accounting method to fair value accounting
under SFAS No. 156, the calculation of amortization and the assessment of impairment were
discontinued and the MSR valuation allowance was written off against the recorded value of the MSR.
Those measurements have been replaced by fair value adjustments that encompass market-driven
valuation changes and the runoff in value that occurs from the passage of time, which are each
separately reported. Under the fair value method, the MSR, net, is carried in the balance sheet at
fair value and the changes in fair value are reported in earnings under the caption mortgage
banking revenue in the period in which the change occurs. Changes in the balance of the MSR were as
follows:
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Balance, beginning of period(1) |
|
$ |
9,966 |
|
|
$ |
11,550 |
|
|
$ |
9,952 |
|
|
$ |
10,890 |
|
Additions for new mortgage servicing rights capitalized |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
1,337 |
|
Changes in fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to changes in model inputs or assumptions(2) |
|
|
(220 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other(3) |
|
|
(428 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,652 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(933 |
) |
Impairment charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,056 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(867 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
9,474 |
|
|
$ |
10,427 |
|
|
$ |
9,474 |
|
|
$ |
10,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of loans serviced for others |
|
$ |
877,648 |
|
|
$ |
978,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSR as a percentage of serviced loans |
|
|
1.08 |
% |
|
|
1.07 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents fair value as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 and amortized cost as of June
30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, which approximated fair value. |
|
(2) |
|
Principally reflects changes in discount rates and prepayment speed assumptions, which are
primarily affected by changes in interest rates. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents changes due to collection/realization of expected cash flows over time. |
The amount of contractually specified servicing fees, late fees and ancillary fees earned, recorded
in mortgage banking revenue on the consolidated statements of income, were $546,000 and $1.9
million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, as compared to
$652,000 and $2.0 million for the same periods in 2006.
Retained mortgage servicing rights are measured at fair values as of the date of sale. We use
quoted market prices when available. Subsequent fair value measurements are determined using a
discounted cash flow model. In order to determine the fair value of the MSR, the present value of
expected future cash flows is estimated. Assumptions used include market discount rates,
anticipated prepayment speeds, delinquency and foreclosure rates, and ancillary fee income. This
model is periodically validated by an independent external model validation group. The model
assumptions and the MSR fair value estimates are also compared to observable trades of similar
portfolios as well as to MSR broker valuations and industry surveys. Key assumptions used in
measuring the fair value of MSR as of September 30, 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Constant prepayment rate |
|
|
12.17 |
% |
Discount rate |
|
|
8.80 |
% |
Weighted average life (years) |
|
|
5.8 |
|
The expected life of the loan can vary from managements estimates due to prepayments by borrowers,
especially when rates fall. Prepayments in excess of managements estimates would negatively impact
the recorded value of the mortgage servicing rights. The
value of the mortgage servicing rights is also dependent upon the discount rate used in the model,
which we base on current market rates. A significant increase in the discount rate would reduce the
value of mortgage servicing rights.
Note 4 Junior Subordinated Debentures
As of September 30, 2007, the Company had 14 wholly-owned trusts (Trusts) that were formed to
issue trust preferred securities and related common securities of the Trusts and are not
consolidated. The Company formed a new Trust that issued trust preferred
14
securities representing an obligation of $61.9 million, and redeemed existing trust preferred
securities representing an obligation of $25.8 million in the third quarter. One Trust,
representing an obligation of approximately $10.3 million (fair value of approximately $10.3
million as of the merger date), was assumed in connection with the North Bay merger and
subsequently redeemed in June 2007. Four Trusts, representing aggregate total obligations of
approximately $37.1 million (fair value of approximately $38.7 million as of the merger date), were
assumed in connection with the Western Sierra merger. Five Trusts, representing aggregate total
obligations of approximately $58.9 million (fair value of approximately $68.6 million as of the
merger date), were assumed in connection with previous mergers.
Following is information about the Trusts as of September 30, 2007:
Junior Subordinated Debentures
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued |
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
Effective |
|
|
|
|
Trust Name |
|
Issue Date |
|
Amount |
|
Value (1) |
|
Rate (2) |
|
Rate (3) |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Redemption Date |
At Fair Value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Umpqua Statutory Trust II |
|
October 2002 |
|
$ |
20,619 |
|
|
$ |
20,945 |
|
|
Floating (4) |
|
|
8.23 |
% |
|
October 2032 |
|
October 2007 |
Umpqua Statutory Trust III |
|
October 2002 |
|
|
30,928 |
|
|
|
31,376 |
|
|
Floating (5) |
|
|
8.23 |
% |
|
November 2032 |
|
November 2007 |
Umpqua Statutory Trust IV |
|
December 2003 |
|
|
10,310 |
|
|
|
10,479 |
|
|
Floating (6) |
|
|
8.23 |
% |
|
January 2034 |
|
January 2009 |
Umpqua Statutory Trust V |
|
December 2003 |
|
|
10,310 |
|
|
|
10,311 |
|
|
Floating (6) |
|
|
8.23 |
% |
|
March 2034 |
|
March 2009 |
Umpqua Master Trust IA |
|
August 2007 |
|
|
41,238 |
|
|
|
38,436 |
|
|
Floating (7) |
|
|
8.23 |
% |
|
September 2037 |
|
September 2012 |
Umpqua Master Trust IB |
|
September 2007 |
|
|
20,619 |
|
|
|
20,437 |
|
|
Floating (8) |
|
|
8.23 |
% |
|
December 2037 |
|
December 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,024 |
|
|
|
131,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Amortized Cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HB Capital Trust I |
|
March 2000 |
|
|
5,310 |
|
|
|
6,566 |
|
|
|
10.875 |
% |
|
|
7.94 |
% |
|
March 2030 |
|
March 2010 |
Humboldt Bancorp Statutory Trust I |
|
February 2001 |
|
|
5,155 |
|
|
|
6,062 |
|
|
|
10.200 |
% |
|
|
8.03 |
% |
|
February 2031 |
|
February 2011 |
Humboldt Bancorp Statutory Trust II |
|
December 2001 |
|
|
10,310 |
|
|
|
11,606 |
|
|
Floating (9) |
|
|
7.75 |
% |
|
December 2031 |
|
December 2006 |
Humboldt Bancorp Staututory Trust III |
|
September 2003 |
|
|
27,836 |
|
|
|
31,327 |
|
|
|
6.75% |
(10) |
|
|
5.04 |
% |
|
September 2033 |
|
September 2008 |
CIB Capital Trust |
|
November 2002 |
|
|
10,310 |
|
|
|
11,405 |
|
|
Floating (5) |
|
|
7.76 |
% |
|
November 2032 |
|
November 2007 |
Western Sierra Statutory Trust I |
|
July 2001 |
|
|
6,186 |
|
|
|
6,362 |
|
|
Floating (11) |
|
|
6.85 |
% |
|
July 2031 |
|
July 2006 |
Western Sierra Statutory Trust II |
|
December 2001 |
|
|
10,310 |
|
|
|
10,603 |
|
|
Floating (9) |
|
|
7.15 |
% |
|
December 2031 |
|
December 2006 |
Western Sierra Statutory Trust III |
|
September 2003 |
|
|
10,310 |
|
|
|
10,508 |
|
|
Floating (12) |
|
|
6.85 |
% |
|
September 2033 |
|
September 2008 |
Western Sierra Statutory Trust IV |
|
September 2003 |
|
|
10,310 |
|
|
|
10,508 |
|
|
Floating (12) |
|
|
6.85 |
% |
|
September 2033 |
|
September 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,037 |
|
|
|
104,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
230,061 |
|
|
$ |
236,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes purchase accounting adjustments, net of accumulated amortization, for junior
subordinated debentures assumed in connection with the Humboldt and Western Sierra mergers as well as fair value
adjustment pursuant to
the adoption of SFAS No. 159 related to trusts recorded at fair value. |
|
(2) |
|
Contractual interest rate of junior subordinated debentures. |
|
(3) |
|
Effective interest rate as of September 2007, including impact of purchase accounting
amortization. |
|
(4) |
|
Rate based on LIBOR plus 3.35%, adjusted quarterly. |
|
(5) |
|
Rate based on LIBOR plus 3.45%, adjusted quarterly. |
|
(6) |
|
Rate based on LIBOR plus 2.85%, adjusted quarterly. |
|
(7) |
|
Rate based on LIBOR plus 1.35%, adjusted quarterly. |
|
(8) |
|
Rate based on LIBOR plus 2.75%, adjusted quarterly. |
|
(9) |
|
Rate based on LIBOR plus 3.60%, adjusted quarterly. |
|
(10) |
|
Rate fixed for 5 years from issuance, then adjusted quarterly thereafter based on LIBOR plus 2.95%. |
|
(11) |
|
Rate based on LIBOR plus 3.58%, adjusted quarterly. |
|
(12) |
|
Rate based on LIBOR plus 2.90%, adjusted quarterly. |
The $230.1 million of trust preferred securities issued to the Trusts as of September 30, 2007
($203.7 million as of December 31, 2006) are reflected as junior subordinated debentures in the
consolidated balance sheets. The common stock issued by the Trusts is recorded in other assets in
the consolidated balance sheets, and totaled $6.9 million and $5.8 million at September 30, 2007
and December 31, 2006.
All of the debentures issued to the Trusts, less the common stock of the Trusts, qualified as Tier
1 capital as of September 30, 2007, under guidance issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System (Federal Reserve Board). Effective April 11, 2005, the Federal Reserve Board
adopted a rule that permits the inclusion of trust preferred securities in Tier 1 capital, but with
stricter quantitative limits. Under the Federal Reserve Board rule, after a five-year transition
period ending March 31, 2009, the aggregate amount of trust preferred securities and certain other
restricted core capital elements is limited to 25% of Tier 1 capital, net of
goodwill. The amount of trust preferred securities and certain other elements in excess of the
limit could be included in Tier 2 capital, subject to restrictions. At September 30, 2007, the
Companys restricted core capital elements were 32% of total core capital, net of
15
goodwill. There can be no assurance that the Federal Reserve Board will not further limit the
amount of trust preferred securities permitted to be included in Tier 1 capital for regulatory
capital purposes.
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted SFAS No. 159 and SFAS No. 157. See Note 10 for
additional information on SFAS No. 157. SFAS No. 159 allows companies to measure at fair value
most financial assets and liabilities that are currently required to be measured in a different
manner, such as at amortized cost. Following the initial fair value measurement date, ongoing
unrealized gains and losses on items for which fair value reporting has been elected are reported
in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. Under SFAS No. 159, fair value reporting may be
elected on an instrument-by-instrument basis, and thus companies may record identical financial
assets and liabilities at fair value or by another measurement basis permitted under generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
Accounting for selected junior subordinated debentures at fair value enables us to more closely
align our financial performance with the economic value of those liabilities. Additionally, we
believe our adoption of the standard will have a positive impact on our ability to manage the
market and interest rate risks associated with the junior subordinated debentures, and potentially
benefit net interest income, net income and earnings per common share during the remainder of 2007,
as well as future periods. The junior subordinated debentures measured at fair value and amortized
cost have been presented as separate line items on the balance sheet. We use a discounted cash flow
model to determine the fair value of the junior subordinated debentures using market discount rate
assumptions.
Umpqua selected the fair value measurement option for certain pre-existing junior subordinated
debentures of $97.9 million (the Umpqua Statutory Trusts) as of the adoption date. The remaining
junior subordinated debentures as of the adoption date were acquired through business combinations
and were measured at fair value at the time of acquisition.
Retained earnings as of January 1, 2007 were reduced by $2.1 million, net of tax, as a result of
the fair value election, as shown below:
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
Net Gain/ |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
prior to |
|
|
(Loss) upon |
|
|
After |
|
|
|
Adoption |
|
|
Adoption |
|
|
Adoption |
|
Other assets (1) |
|
$ |
1,934 |
|
|
$ |
(1,934 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
97,941 |
|
|
|
(2,491 |
) |
|
|
100,432 |
|
Other liabilities (2) |
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax cumulative effect of adoption of the fair value option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,441 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Increase in deferred tax asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of adoption of the fair value option
(charged to retained earnings) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2,064 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consists of issuance costs related to junior subordinated debentures for which fair
value option was elected. |
|
(2) |
|
Consists of accrued interest related to junior subordinated debentures for which fair
value option was elected. |
The gains and losses described in the table above will not be recognized in earnings based upon
application of SFAS No. 159. Regulatory capital will be reduced by the adjustment to retained
earnings. However, the Companys capital exceeds the capital levels required to be classified as
well-capitalized, and the reduction in retained earnings resulting from the adoption of SFAS No.
159 will have minimal effect on the Companys current regulatory capital ratios.
On July 19, 2007, the Company announced plans to issue $130 million of new trust preferred
securities over the next four months and to use the proceeds to redeem $75 million of trust
preferred securities related to three Trusts during the third and fourth quarters; to fund
previously announced share repurchases; and, for other corporate purposes. Of the $61.9 million in
new trust preferred securities issued in the third quarter, the Company used $25.8 million of the
proceeds to redeem trust preferred securities issued by one Trust and the remainder to repurchase
1.65 million shares of common stock. On October 18, 2007, the Company announced that it intended to
put on hold plans to issue additional trust preferred securities for at least another quarter until
there is improvement in the credit markets. The Company selected the fair value measurement option
for the trust preferred securities issued in the third quarter.
As a result of the fair value measurement election for the above financial instruments, we recorded
gains of $4.1 million and $4.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007
resulting from the change in fair value of the junior subordinated debentures recorded at fair
value. These gains were recorded as other non-interest income. Interest expense on junior
subordinated debentures is recorded on an accrual basis. The junior subordinated debentures
recorded at fair value of $132.0 million had contractual unpaid principal amounts of $134.0 million
outstanding as of September 30, 2007.
16
Note 5 Commitments and Contingencies
Lease Commitments The Company leases 109 sites under non-cancelable operating leases. The leases
contain various provisions for increases in rental rates, based either on changes in the published
Consumer Price Index or a predetermined escalation schedule. Substantially all of the leases
provide the Company with the option to extend the lease term one or more times upon expiration.
Rent expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $3.0 million and $8.9
million, respectively, compared to $2.7 million and $6.7 million in the comparable periods in 2006.
Rent expense was offset by rent income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 of
$183,000 and $459,000, respectively, compared to $143,000 and $271,000 in the comparable periods in
2006.
Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk The Companys financial statements do not
reflect various commitments and contingent liabilities that arise in the normal course of the
Banks business and involve elements of credit, liquidity and interest rate risk. The following
table presents a summary of the Banks commitments and contingent liabilities:
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007 |
Commitments to extend credit |
|
$ |
1,498,690 |
|
Commitments to extend overdrafts |
|
$ |
197,382 |
|
Commitments to originate loans held-for-sale |
|
$ |
35,514 |
|
Forward sales commitments |
|
$ |
22,000 |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
$ |
56,009 |
|
The Bank is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet credit risk in the normal
course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments
include commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and financial guarantees. Those
instruments involve elements of credit and interest-rate risk similar to the amounts recognized in
the consolidated balance sheets. The contract or notional amounts of those instruments reflect the
extent of the Banks involvement in particular classes of financial instruments.
The Banks exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the
financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit, and financial
guarantees written, is represented by the contractual notional amount of those instruments. The
Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for
on-balance-sheet instruments.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation
of any covenant or condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the
commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not
necessarily represent future cash requirements. While most standby letters of credit are not
utilized, a significant portion of such utilization is on an immediate payment basis. The Bank
evaluates each customers creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral
obtained, if it is deemed necessary by the Bank upon extension of credit, is based on managements
credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral varies but may include cash, accounts receivable,
inventory, premises and equipment and income-producing commercial properties.
The Bank enters into forward delivery contracts to sell residential mortgage loans or
mortgage-backed securities to broker/dealers at specific prices and dates in order to hedge the
interest rate risk in its portfolio of mortgage loans held for sale and its residential mortgage
loan commitments. Credit risk associated with forward contracts is limited to the replacement cost
of those forward contracts in a gain position. There were no counterparty default losses on forward
contracts in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006. Market risk with respect
to forward contracts arises principally from changes in the value of contractual positions due to
changes in interest rates. The Bank limits its exposure to market risk by monitoring differences
between commitments to customers and forward contracts with broker/dealers. In the event the
Company has forward delivery contract commitments in excess of available mortgage loans, the
Company completes the transaction by either paying or receiving a fee to or from the broker/dealer
equal to the increase or decrease in the market value of the forward contract. At September 30,
2007, the Bank had commitments to originate mortgage loans held for sale totaling $35.5 million
with a net fair value asset of approximately $34,000. As of that date, it also had forward sales
commitments of $22.0 million with a net fair value liability of $52,000. The Bank recorded a loss
of $103,000 and a gain of $253,000 related to its commitments to originate mortgage loans and
related forward sales commitments in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007,
respectively, as compared to a loss of $152,000 and a gain of $80,000 in the comparable periods in
2006.
Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written are conditional commitments issued by
the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. These guarantees are
primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper,
bond financing and similar transactions. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit
17
is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Bank holds
cash, marketable securities, or real estate as collateral supporting those commitments for which
collateral is deemed necessary. The Bank has not been required to perform on any financial
guarantees and did not incur any losses in connection with standby letters of credit during the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006. At September 30, 2007, approximately $28.5
million of standby letters of credit expire within one year, and $27.5 million expire thereafter.
Upon issuance, the Company recognizes a liability equivalent to the amount of fees received from
the customer for these standby letter of credit commitments. Fees are recognized ratably over the
term of the standby letter of credit. The fair value of guarantees associated with standby letters
of credit was $188,000 as of September 30, 2007.
At September 30, 2007, the reserve for unfunded commitments, which is included in other liabilities
on the consolidated balance sheet, was $1.2 million. The adequacy of the reserve for unfunded
commitments is reviewed on a quarterly basis, based upon changes in the amounts of commitments,
loss experience, and economic conditions.
Mortgage loans sold to investors may be sold with servicing rights retained, with only the standard
legal representations and warranties regarding recourse to the Bank. Management believes that any
liabilities that may result from such recourse provisions are not significant.
Legal ProceedingsIn the ordinary course of business, various claims and lawsuits are brought by
and against the Company, the Bank and Strand. In the opinion of management, there is no pending or
threatened proceeding in which an adverse decision could result in a material adverse change in the
Companys consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
Concentrations of Credit Risk The Company grants real estate mortgage, real estate construction,
commercial, agricultural and installment loans and leases to customers throughout Oregon,
Washington and California. In managements judgment, a concentration exists in real estate-related
loans, which represented approximately 80% and 81% of the Companys loan and lease portfolio at
September 30, 2007, and December 31, 2006, respectively. Commercial real estate concentrations are
managed to assure wide geographic and business diversity. Although management believes such
concentrations have no more than the normal risk of collectibility, a substantial decline in the
economy in general, or a decline in real estate values in the Companys primary market areas in
particular, could have an adverse impact on the repayment of these loans. Personal and business
incomes represent the primary source of repayment for a majority of these loans. There has been
deterioration in the northern California residential development market which has led to an
increase in non-performing loans and provision for loan and lease losses this quarter.
The Bank recognizes the credit risks inherent in dealing with other depository institutions.
Accordingly, to prevent excessive exposure to any single correspondent, the Bank has established
general standards for selecting correspondent banks as well as internal limits for allowable
exposure to any single correspondent. In addition, the Bank has an investment policy that sets
forth limitations that apply to all investments with respect to credit rating and concentrations
per issuer.
Note 6 Stock-Based Compensation
The compensation cost related to stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units
(included in salaries and employee benefits) was $783,000 and $2.6 million for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, as compared to $545,000 and $1.6 million for the
same periods in 2006, respectively. The total income tax benefit recognized in the income statement
related to stock based compensation was $313,000 and $1.0 million for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007, respectively, as compared to $218,000 and $625,000 for the same periods
in 2006, respectively.
The following table summarizes information about stock option activity for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007:
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Avg |
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
Weighted-Avg |
|
Remaining Contractual |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Term (Years) |
|
Intrinsic Value |
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
1,807 |
|
|
$ |
14.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
50 |
|
|
$ |
26.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
542 |
|
|
$ |
13.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(640 |
) |
|
$ |
12.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/expired |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
$ |
21.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
1,717 |
|
|
$ |
15.53 |
|
|
|
5.21 |
|
|
$ |
9,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable, end of period |
|
|
1,309 |
|
|
$ |
13.27 |
|
|
|
4.57 |
|
|
$ |
9,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value (which is the amount by which the stock price exceeded the exercise price
on the date of exercise) of options
18
exercised during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $1.8 million and $7.9
million, respectively. This compared to the total intrinsic value of options exercised during the
three and nine months September 30, 2006 of $4.1 million and $10.4 million, respectively. During
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the amount of cash received from the exercise
of stock options was $2.7 million and $7.7 million, respectively.
The fair value of each option grant is estimated as of the grant date using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model. There were no stock options granted in the three months ended September 30,
2007 and 2006. The following assumptions were used for stock options granted in the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Dividend yield |
|
|
3.29 |
% |
|
|
2.68 |
% |
Expected life (years) |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
Risk-free rate |
|
|
4.46 |
% |
|
|
4.30 |
% |
Weighted average grant date fair value of options granted |
|
$ |
7.49 |
|
|
$ |
9.18 |
|
The Company grants restricted stock periodically as a part of the 2003 Plan for the benefit of
employees. Restricted shares issued currently vest on an annual basis over five years for all
grants issued. The following table summarizes information about non-vested restricted shares as of
September 30, 2007 and changes for the nine months ended September 30, 2007:
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
Restricted |
|
Weighted |
|
|
Shares |
|
Average Grant |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Date Fair Value |
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
122 |
|
|
$ |
26.36 |
|
Granted |
|
|
86 |
|
|
$ |
27.70 |
|
Released |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
$ |
24.90 |
|
Forfeited/expired |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
$ |
26.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
164 |
|
|
$ |
27.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total fair value of restricted shares vested during the three and nine months ended September
30, 2007 was $201,000 and $718,000. This compared to total fair value of restricted shares vested
during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 of $292,000 and $300,000.
In the second quarter of 2007, the Company awarded a restricted stock unit grant to an executive
under an existing plan that vests based on continued service in various increments through June 30,
2011. The Company shall issue certificates for the vested grant units within the seventh month
following termination of executives employment. In addition, a 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan was
approved during the second quarter which authorizes the award of restricted stock unit grants,
which are subject to performance-based vesting as well as other approved vesting conditions. The
restricted stock units granted under the 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan generally cliff vest after
three years based on performance and service conditions. The compensation cost related to these
restricted stock units was $183,000 and $782,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2007. At September 30, 2007, 122,000 restricted stock units with a weighted average grant date
fair value of $25.11 were outstanding; 15,000 restricted stock units at a weighted average grant
date fair value of $26.39 were vested and deferred.
As of September 30, 2007, there was $2.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
non-vested stock options which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.3
years. As of September 30, 2007, there was $3.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to non-vested restricted stock which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average
period of 3.6 years. As of September 30, 2007, there was $2.3 million of total unrecognized
compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock units which is expected to be recognized
over a weighted-average period of 2.8 years.
For the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, the Company received income tax benefits of
$647,000 and $1.6 million, respectively, related to the exercise of non-qualified employee stock
options, disqualifying dispositions in the exercise of incentive stock options and the vesting of
restricted shares. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, the Company received
income tax benefits of $3.1 million and $3.5 million, respectively. In the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006, the cash
19
flows from excess tax benefits (tax benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess of the
compensation cost recognized) classified as financing cash flows were $243,000 and $855,000,
respectively. The remaining cash flows from tax benefits were recognized as operating cash flows.
Note 7 Income Taxes
The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, as well
as the Oregon and California state jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal
or state and local tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2003. The Internal Revenue
Service concluded an examination of the Companys U.S. income tax returns for 2003 and 2004 in the
second quarter of 2006. The results of the examination had no significant impact on the financial
statements.
The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes, (FIN 48) on January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the
Company recognized no material adjustment in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits. Accrued
interest related to unrecognized tax benefits is recognized in tax expense.
Note 8 Per Share Information
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed in a similar
manner, except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares
that would have been outstanding if potentially dilutive common shares were issued using the
treasury stock method. For all periods presented, stock options, unvested restricted shares and
restricted stock units are the only potentially dilutive instruments issued by the Company.
The following is a computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006:
Earnings per Share
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
60,490 |
|
|
|
57,802 |
|
|
|
59,790 |
|
|
|
50,378 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
13,177 |
|
|
$ |
22,856 |
|
|
$ |
53,752 |
|
|
$ |
59,914 |
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
60,490 |
|
|
|
57,802 |
|
|
|
59,790 |
|
|
|
50,378 |
|
Net effect of the assumed exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted shares,
based on the treasury stock method |
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total weighted average shares and common stock equivalents outstanding |
|
|
61,065 |
|
|
|
58,452 |
|
|
|
60,450 |
|
|
|
51,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
13,177 |
|
|
$ |
22,856 |
|
|
$ |
53,752 |
|
|
$ |
59,914 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
Note 9 Segment Information
The Company operates three primary segments: Community Banking, Mortgage Banking and Retail
Brokerage. The Community Banking segments principal business focus is the offering of loan and
deposit products to business and retail customers in its primary market areas. As of September 30,
2007, the Community Banking segment operated 146 stores located throughout Oregon, Northern
California and Washington.
The Mortgage Banking segment, which operates as a division of the Bank, originates, sells and
services residential mortgage loans.
The Retail Brokerage segment consists of the operations of Strand, which offers a full range of
retail brokerage services and products to its clients who consist primarily of individual
investors. The Company accounts for intercompany fees and services between Strand and the Bank at
an estimated fair value according to regulatory requirements for services provided. Intercompany
items relate primarily to management services and interest on intercompany borrowings.
Summarized financial information concerning the Companys reportable segments and the
reconciliation to the consolidated financial results is shown in the following tables:
20
Segment Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
Community |
|
Retail |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Banking |
|
Brokerage |
|
Banking |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
124,103 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
3,749 |
|
|
$ |
127,861 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
51,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,056 |
|
|
|
53,986 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
72,173 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1,693 |
|
|
|
73,875 |
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
20,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,420 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
14,299 |
|
|
|
2,798 |
|
|
|
1,446 |
|
|
|
18,543 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
48,089 |
|
|
|
2,409 |
|
|
|
2,132 |
|
|
|
52,630 |
|
Merger-related expense |
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
17,700 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
1,007 |
|
|
|
19,105 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
5,381 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
5,928 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
12,319 |
|
|
$ |
254 |
|
|
$ |
604 |
|
|
$ |
13,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
Community |
|
Retail |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Banking |
|
Brokerage |
|
Banking |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
352,001 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
12,062 |
|
|
$ |
364,104 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
143,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,412 |
|
|
|
149,603 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
208,810 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
5,650 |
|
|
|
214,501 |
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
23,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,916 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
34,264 |
|
|
|
8,103 |
|
|
|
6,071 |
|
|
|
48,438 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
139,432 |
|
|
|
7,429 |
|
|
|
6,789 |
|
|
|
153,650 |
|
Merger-related expense |
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
76,526 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
4,932 |
|
|
|
82,173 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
26,188 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
1,973 |
|
|
|
28,421 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
50,338 |
|
|
$ |
455 |
|
|
$ |
2,959 |
|
|
$ |
53,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Community |
|
Retail |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Banking |
|
Brokerage |
|
Banking |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
109,731 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
4,992 |
|
|
$ |
114,738 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
37,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,155 |
|
|
|
40,939 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
71,947 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
1,837 |
|
|
|
73,799 |
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
2,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,352 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
9,331 |
|
|
|
2,608 |
|
|
|
1,537 |
|
|
|
13,476 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
43,091 |
|
|
|
2,447 |
|
|
|
2,697 |
|
|
|
48,235 |
|
Merger-related expense |
|
|
2,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,451 |
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
33,384 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
34,237 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
11,047 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
11,381 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
22,337 |
|
|
$ |
113 |
|
|
$ |
406 |
|
|
$ |
22,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Community |
|
Retail |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Banking |
|
Brokerage |
|
Banking |
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
280,388 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
8,984 |
|
|
$ |
289,427 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
94,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,813 |
|
|
|
100,592 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
185,609 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
3,171 |
|
|
|
188,835 |
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
2,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,427 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
25,950 |
|
|
|
7,702 |
|
|
|
5,832 |
|
|
|
39,484 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
114,182 |
|
|
|
7,493 |
|
|
|
6,876 |
|
|
|
128,551 |
|
Merger-related expense |
|
|
4,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,358 |
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
90,592 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
2,127 |
|
|
|
92,983 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
32,095 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
851 |
|
|
|
33,069 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
58,497 |
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
$ |
1,276 |
|
|
$ |
59,914 |
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
Community |
|
Retail |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Banking |
|
Brokerage |
|
Banking |
|
Consolidated |
Total assets |
|
$ |
7,992,619 |
|
|
$ |
9,830 |
|
|
$ |
223,362 |
|
|
$ |
8,225,811 |
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
5,887,239 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
192,196 |
|
|
$ |
6,079,435 |
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
6,506,848 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,369 |
|
|
$ |
6,518,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
Community |
|
Retail |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Banking |
|
Brokerage |
|
Banking |
|
Consolidated |
Total assets |
|
$ |
7,087,227 |
|
|
$ |
7,656 |
|
|
$ |
249,353 |
|
|
$ |
7,344,236 |
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
5,139,818 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
222,044 |
|
|
$ |
5,361,862 |
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
5,834,835 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,459 |
|
|
$ |
5,840,294 |
|
Note 10 Fair Value Measurement
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP, and
expands disclosures about fair value measurement. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 157, there was no
cumulative effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings and no impact on the financial
statements, other than in conjunction with the adoption of SFAS No. 159, in the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2007.
The following table presents information about the Companys assets and liabilities measured at
fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2007, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of
the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine such fair value. In general, fair
values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Fair values determined
by Level 2 inputs utilize inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for
similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are
observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable
at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability,
and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability.
In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair
value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value
measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level input that is
significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Companys assessment of the
significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment,
and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
at September 30, 2007, Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
Other |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for |
|
Observable |
|
Unobservable |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Identical Assets |
|
Inputs |
|
Inputs |
Description |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
Trading securities |
|
$ |
4,144 |
|
|
$ |
4,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
911,883 |
|
|
|
166,682 |
|
|
|
745,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Servicing Rights |
|
|
9,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value |
|
$ |
925,501 |
|
|
$ |
170,826 |
|
|
$ |
754,675 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures, at fair value |
|
$ |
131,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
131,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value |
|
$ |
131,984 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
131,984 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
The following methods were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial
instrument above:
Securities - Fair values for investment securities are based on quoted market prices when available
or through the use of
alternative approaches, such as matrix or model pricing, when market quotes are not readily
accessible or available.
Mortgage Servicing Rights The fair value of mortgage servicing rights is estimated using a
discounted cash flow model.
Junior Subordinated Debentures The fair value of junior subordinated debentures is estimated
using a discounted cash flow model.
22
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
This Report contains certain forward-looking statements, which are intended to be covered by the
safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided by the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. These statements may include statements that expressly or implicitly predict future
results, performance or events. All statements other than statements of historical fact are
forward-looking statements. In addition, the words anticipates, expects, believes, estimates
and intends and words or phrases of similar meaning identify forward-looking statements. We make
forward-looking statements regarding projected sources of funds, adequacy of our allowance for loan
and lease losses and provision for loan and lease losses, and subsequent charge-offs.
Forward-looking statements involve substantial risks and uncertainties, many of which are difficult
to predict and are generally beyond the control of Umpqua. Risks and uncertainties include those
set forth in filings with the SEC and the following:
|
|
|
The ability to attract new deposits and loans |
|
|
|
|
Competitive market pricing factors |
|
|
|
|
Deterioration in economic conditions that could result in increased loan and lease
losses |
|
|
|
|
Market interest rate volatility |
|
|
|
|
Changes in legal or regulatory requirements |
|
|
|
|
The ability to recruit and retain certain key management and staff |
|
|
|
|
Risks associated with merger integration |
|
|
|
|
Significant decline in the market value of the Company that could result in an
impairment of goodwill |
There are many factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated
by these forward-looking statements. We do not intend to update these forward-looking statements.
Readers should consider any forward-looking statements in light of this explanation, and we caution
readers about relying on forward-looking statements.
General
Umpqua Holdings Corporation (referred to in this report as we, our, Umpqua, and the
Company), an Oregon corporation, is a financial holding company with two principal operating
subsidiaries, Umpqua Bank (the Bank) and Strand, Atkinson, Williams and York, Inc. (Strand).
Our headquarters is located in Portland, Oregon, and we engage primarily in the business of
commercial and retail banking and the delivery of retail brokerage services. The Bank provides a
wide range of banking, mortgage banking and other financial services to corporate, institutional
and individual customers. Along with our subsidiaries, we are subject to the regulations of state
and federal agencies and undergo periodic examinations by these regulatory agencies.
We are considered one of the most innovative community banks in the United States, combining a
retail product delivery approach with an emphasis on quality-assured personal service. The Bank has
evolved from a traditional community bank into a community-oriented financial services retailer by
implementing a variety of retail marketing strategies to increase revenue and differentiate
ourselves from our competition.
Strand is a registered broker-dealer and investment advisor with offices in Portland, Eugene, and
Medford, Oregon, and in 11 Umpqua Bank stores. Strand offers a full range of investment products
and services including: stocks, fixed income securities (municipal, corporate, and government
bonds, CDs, and money market instruments), mutual funds, annuities, options, retirement planning,
money management services, life insurance, disability insurance and medical supplement policies.
Executive Overview
Highlights for the third quarter of 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
Total gross loans and leases were $6.1 billion as of September 30, 2007, compared to
$5.4 billion as of December 31, 2006, respectively, an increase of $717.6 million or 13%.
The North Bay acquisition accounted for $443.0 million of the growth. The annualized
organic loan growth rate (excluding growth through acquisition) was 7% as of September 30,
2007. |
|
|
|
|
Total deposits were $6.5 billion as of September 30, 2007, compared to $5.8 billion as
of December 31, 2006, an increase of $677.9 million or 12%. The North Bay acquisition
accounted for $462.6 million of the growth. The annualized organic deposit growth rate
(excluding growth through acquisition) was 5% as of September 30, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated assets were $8.2 billion as of September 30, 2007, compared to $7.3
billion as of December 31, 2006, an increase of $881.6 million or 12%. The North Bay
acquisition accounted for $727.8 million of the growth. |
23
|
|
|
Non-performing loans increased $21.0 million during the quarter related primarily to the
residential development portfolio in our northern California operations, contributing to a
$20.4 million provision for loan and lease losses during the quarter. |
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin decreased to 4.20% and 4.33% for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, compared to 4.83% and 4.74% for the same periods a year ago. The
decrease in net interest margin resulted primarily from increases in short-term market
interest rates, reversal of $1.3 million of interest income during the quarter related to
new non-accrual loans and the competitive climate. |
|
|
|
|
Net income per diluted share was $0.22 and $0.89 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, as compared to $0.39 and $1.17 per diluted share earned in the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2006. The interest income reversal due to new
non-accrual loans and provision for loan and lease losses contributed to the significant
decline in net income per diluted share. |
|
|
|
|
During the third quarter, the Company issued $61.9 million of new trust preferred
securities, with a weighted average adjustable interest rate of 3 month LIBOR plus 182
basis points, and redeemed existing trust preferred securities representing obligations of
$25.8 million. |
|
|
|
|
The Company repurchased 1.6 million shares of stock at a weighted average price of
$21.23 per share during the third quarter under its stock repurchase plan. |
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared in the third quarter of 2007 were $0.19 per share which was an
increase of $0.01 per share compared to the first and second quarter of 2007. |
Summary of Critical Accounting Policies
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for the year ended December 31, 2006 included in the Form 10-K filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 1, 2007. Not all of these critical accounting policies
require management to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments or estimates. Management
believes that the following policies would be considered critical under the SECs definition.
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and Reserve for Unfunded Commitments
The Bank performs regular credit reviews of the loan and lease portfolio to determine the credit
quality of the portfolio and the adherence to underwriting standards. When loans and leases are
originated, they are assigned a risk rating from 1 to 10 that is assessed periodically during the
term of the loan through the credit review process. The 10 risk rating categories are a primary
factor in determining an appropriate amount for the allowance for loan and lease losses. The Bank
has a management Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (ALLL) Committee, which is responsible for,
among other things, regular review of the ALLL methodology, including loss factors, and ensuring
that it is designed and applied in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The
ALLL Committee reviews loans that have been placed on non-accrual status and approves placing loans
on impaired status. The ALLL Committee also approves removing loans that are no longer impaired
from impairment and non-accrual status. The Banks Audit and Compliance Committee provides board
oversight of the ALLL process and reviews and approves the ALLL methodology on a quarterly basis.
Each risk rating is assessed an inherent credit loss factor that determines the amount of the
allowance for loan and lease losses provided for that group of loans with similar risk rating.
Credit loss factors may vary by region based on managements belief that there may ultimately be
different credit loss rates experienced in each region.
Regular credit reviews of the portfolio also identify loans that are considered potentially
impaired. Potentially impaired loans are referred to the ALLL Committee which reviews and approves
designated loans as impaired. A loan is considered impaired when based on current information and
events, we determine that we will probably not be able to collect all amounts due according to the
loan contract, including scheduled interest payments. When we identify a loan as impaired, we
measure the impairment using discounted cash flows, except when the sole remaining source of the
repayment for the loan is the liquidation of the collateral. In these cases, we use the current
fair value of the collateral, less selling costs, instead of discounted cash flows. If we determine
that the value of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, we recognize
an impairment reserve as a specific component to be provided for in the allowance for loan and
lease losses. The combination of the risk rating-based allowance component and the impairment
reserve allowance component lead to an allocated allowance for loan and lease losses.
The reserve for unfunded commitments (RUC) is established to absorb inherent losses associated
with our commitment to lend funds, such as with a letter or line of credit. The adequacy of the
ALLL and RUC are monitored on a regular basis and are based on managements evaluation of numerous
factors. These factors include the quality of the current loan portfolio; the trend in the loan
24
portfolios risk ratings; current economic conditions; loan concentrations; loan growth rates;
past-due and non-performing trends; evaluation of specific loss estimates for all significant
problem loans; historical charge-off and recovery experience; and other pertinent information.
Management believes that the ALLL was adequate as of September 30, 2007. There is, however, no
assurance that future loan losses will not exceed the levels provided for in the ALLL and could
possibly result in additional charges to the provision for loan and lease losses. In addition, bank
regulatory authorities, as part of their periodic examination of the Bank, may require additional
charges to the provision for loan and lease losses in future periods if warranted as a result of
their review. Approximately 80% of our loan portfolio is secured by real estate, and a significant
decline in real estate market values may require an increase in the allowance for loan and lease
losses. There has been deterioration in the northern California residential development market
which has led to an increase in non-performing loans and allowance for loan and lease losses this
quarter.
Mortgage Servicing Rights
Retained mortgage servicing rights are measured by allocating the carrying value of the loans
between the assets sold and the interest retained, based on their relative fair values at the date
of the sale. Subsequent fair value measurements are determined using a discounted cash flow model.
The expected life of the loan can vary from managements estimates due to prepayments by borrowers,
especially when interest rates fall. Prepayments in excess of managements estimates would
negatively impact the recorded value of the mortgage servicing rights. The value of the mortgage
servicing rights is also dependent upon the discount rate used in the model. Management reviews
this rate on an ongoing basis based on current market rates. A significant increase in the discount
rate would reduce the value of mortgage servicing rights.
Upon adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 156, Accounting for
Servicing of Financial Assets an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities (SFAS No. 156) on January 1,
2007, the Company has elected to measure its residential mortgage servicing assets at fair value.
Upon the change from the lower of cost or fair value accounting method to fair value accounting
under SFAS No. 156, the calculation of amortization and the assessment of impairment were
discontinued. Additional information is included in Note 3 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Valuation of Goodwill and Intangible Assets
At September 30, 2007, we had $767.2 million in goodwill and other intangible assets as a result of
business combinations. Goodwill and other intangibles with indefinite lives are not amortized but
instead are periodically tested for impairment. Management performs an impairment analysis for the
intangible assets with indefinite lives on a quarterly basis and determined that there was no
impairment as of September 30, 2007. The valuation is determined using discounted cash flows of
forecasted earnings, estimated sales price based on recent observable market transactions and
market capitalization based on current stock price. If impairment was deemed to exist, a write down
of the asset would occur with a charge to earnings. The impairment analysis requires management to
make subjective judgments. Events and factors that may significantly affect the estimates include,
among others, competitive forces, customer behaviors and attrition, changes in revenue growth
trends, cost structures, technology, changes in discount rates and specific industry and market
conditions.
Stock-based Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, Share Based Payment, a
revision to the previously issued guidance on accounting for stock options and other forms of
equity-based compensation. SFAS No. 123R requires companies to recognize in the income statement
the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based forms of compensation issued to
employees over the employees requisite service period (generally the vesting period). The
requisite service period may be subject to performance conditions. The fair value of each option
grant is estimated as of the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Management
assumptions utilized at the time of grant impact the fair value of the option calculated under the
Black-Scholes methodology, and ultimately, the expense that will be recognized over the life of the
option. Additional information is included in Note 6 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Fair Value
Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which among other
things, requires enhanced disclosures about financial instruments carried at fair value. SFAS No.
157 establishes a hierarchical disclosure framework associated with the level of pricing
observability utilized in measuring financial instruments at fair value. The degree of judgment
utilized in measuring the fair value of financial instruments generally correlates to the level of
pricing observability. Financial instruments with readily available active quoted prices or for
which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices generally will have a higher degree of
pricing observability and a lesser degree of judgment utilized in measuring fair value. Conversely,
financial instruments rarely traded or not quoted will generally have little or no pricing
observability and a higher degree of judgment utilized in measuring
25
fair value. Pricing observability is impacted by a number of factors, including the type of
financial instrument, whether the financial instrument is new to the market and not yet established
and the characteristics specific to the transaction.
See Note 10 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information
about the level of pricing transparency associated with financial instruments carried at fair
value.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
For the three months ended September 30, 2007, net income was $13.2 million, or $0.22 per diluted
share, as compared to $22.9 million, or $0.39 per diluted share for the three months ended
September 30, 2006. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, net income was $53.8 million, or
$0.89 per diluted share, as compared to $59.9 million, or $1.17 per diluted share for the nine
months ended September 30, 2006. The decrease in net income for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007 is principally attributable to increased provision for loan and lease losses and
operating expenses, partially offset by increased net interest and non-interest income. We
completed the acquisitions of North Bay Bancorp and Western Sierra Bancorp on April 26, 2007 and
June 2, 2006, respectively, and the results of the acquired operations are only included in our
financial results starting on April 27, 2007 and June 3, 2006, respectively.
We incur significant expenses related to the completion and integration of mergers. Accordingly, we
believe that our operating results are best measured on a comparative basis excluding the impact of
merger-related expenses, net of tax. We define operating income as income before merger related
expenses, net of tax, and we calculate operating income per diluted share by dividing operating
income by the same diluted share total used in determining diluted earnings per share (see Note 8
of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). Operating income and operating income
per diluted share are considered non-GAAP financial measures. Although we believe the
presentation of non-GAAP financial measures provides a better indication of our operating
performance, readers of this report are urged to review the GAAP results as presented in the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
The following table presents a reconciliation of operating income and operating income per diluted
share to net income and net income per diluted share for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2007 and 2006:
Reconciliation of Operating Income to Net Income
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
13,177 |
|
|
$ |
22,856 |
|
|
$ |
53,752 |
|
|
$ |
59,914 |
|
Merger-related expenses, net of tax |
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
1,471 |
|
|
|
1,920 |
|
|
|
2,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
13,335 |
|
|
$ |
24,327 |
|
|
$ |
55,672 |
|
|
$ |
62,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per diluted share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
Merger-related expenses, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
$ |
1.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the returns on average assets, average shareholders equity and
average tangible shareholders equity for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and
2006. For each of the periods presented, the table includes the calculated ratios based on reported
net income and operating income as shown in the Table above. Our return on average shareholders
equity is negatively impacted as the result of capital required to support goodwill. To the extent
this performance metric is used to compare our performance with other financial institutions that
do not have merger-related intangible assets, we believe it beneficial to also consider the return
on average tangible shareholders equity. The return on average tangible shareholders equity is
calculated by dividing net income by average shareholders equity less average intangible assets.
The return on average tangible shareholders equity is considered a non-GAAP financial measure and
should be viewed in conjunction with the return on average shareholders equity.
26
Returns on Average Assets, Shareholders Equity and Tangible Shareholders Equity
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Returns on average assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
0.64 |
% |
|
|
1.27 |
% |
|
|
0.93 |
% |
|
|
1.29 |
% |
Operating income |
|
|
0.65 |
% |
|
|
1.35 |
% |
|
|
0.96 |
% |
|
|
1.35 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Returns on average shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
4.20 |
% |
|
|
8.06 |
% |
|
|
5.91 |
% |
|
|
8.80 |
% |
Operating income |
|
|
4.25 |
% |
|
|
8.58 |
% |
|
|
6.12 |
% |
|
|
9.18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Returns on average tangible shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
10.92 |
% |
|
|
20.50 |
% |
|
|
14.79 |
% |
|
|
20.87 |
% |
Operating income |
|
|
11.05 |
% |
|
|
21.82 |
% |
|
|
15.32 |
% |
|
|
21.78 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of average tangible shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shareholders equity |
|
$ |
1,245,390 |
|
|
$ |
1,124,398 |
|
|
$ |
1,215,730 |
|
|
$ |
910,311 |
|
Less: average intangible assets |
|
|
(766,591 |
) |
|
|
(681,988 |
) |
|
|
(729,979 |
) |
|
|
(526,459 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average tangible shareholders equity |
|
$ |
478,799 |
|
|
$ |
442,410 |
|
|
$ |
485,751 |
|
|
$ |
383,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INTEREST INCOME
Net interest income is the largest source of our operating income. Net interest income for the
three months ended September 30, 2007 was $73.9 million, which was consistent with $73.8 million
over the same period in 2006. Net interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2007 was
negatively impacted by a $1.3 million reversal of interest income on new non-accrual loans during
the quarter. Net interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $214.5 million,
an increase of $25.7 million, or 14% over the same period in 2006. The results for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to the same periods in 2006 are attributable to
growth in outstanding average interest-earning assets, primarily loans and leases, partially offset
by both growth in interest-bearing liabilities, primarily money-market and time deposits, and a
decrease in net interest margin. In addition to organic growth, the Western Sierra merger, which
was completed on June 2, 2006, and the North Bay merger, which was completed on April 26, 2007,
contributed to the increase in interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities in the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 over the same periods in 2006. The fair value of
interest-earning assets acquired as a result of the Western Sierra merger totaled $1.1 billion, and
interest-bearing liabilities totaled $1.1 billion. The fair value of interest-earning assets
acquired as a result of the North Bay merger totaled $523.5 million, and interest-bearing
liabilities totaled $572.2 million.
The net interest margin (net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets) on
a fully tax-equivalent basis was 4.20% for the three months ended September 30, 2007, a decrease of
63 basis points as compared to the same period in 2006. The net interest margin on a fully
tax-equivalent basis was 4.33% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, a decrease of 41 basis
points as compared to the same period in 2006. The decrease in net interest margin over these
periods resulted from higher short-term market rates for most of the period and the competitive
climate, characterized by increasing deposit costs combined with declining interest earning asset
yields. The $1.3 million reversal of interest income on new non-accrual loans in the third
quarter discussed above contributed to an 8 basis point decline in tax equivalent interest earning
asset yields and 7 basis point decline in the tax equivalent net interest margin during the
quarter.
Our net interest income is affected by changes in the amount and mix of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities, as well as changes in the yields earned on interest-earning assets
and rates paid on deposits and borrowed funds. The following table presents condensed average
balance sheet information, together with interest income and yields on average interest-earning
assets, and interest expense and rates paid on average interest-bearing liabilities for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006:
27
Average Rates and Balances (Quarterly)
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Income or |
|
|
Yields |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Income or |
|
|
Yields |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
or Rates |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
or Rates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST-EARNING ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases (1) |
|
$ |
6,043,121 |
|
|
$ |
116,111 |
|
|
|
7.62 |
% |
|
$ |
5,352,986 |
|
|
$ |
106,320 |
|
|
|
7.88 |
% |
Taxable securities |
|
|
765,345 |
|
|
|
9,233 |
|
|
|
4.83 |
% |
|
|
609,131 |
|
|
|
6,902 |
|
|
|
4.53 |
% |
Non-taxable securities (2) |
|
|
159,998 |
|
|
|
2,247 |
|
|
|
5.62 |
% |
|
|
107,851 |
|
|
|
1,640 |
|
|
|
6.08 |
% |
Temporary investments (3) |
|
|
71,165 |
|
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
5.18 |
% |
|
|
37,225 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
3.99 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest earning assets |
|
|
7,039,629 |
|
|
|
128,520 |
|
|
|
7.24 |
% |
|
|
6,107,193 |
|
|
|
115,236 |
|
|
|
7.49 |
% |
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
(69,099 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56,891 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,219,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,085,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
8,190,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,135,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing checking and
savings accounts |
|
$ |
3,271,992 |
|
|
$ |
25,145 |
|
|
|
3.05 |
% |
|
$ |
2,737,802 |
|
|
$ |
17,693 |
|
|
|
2.56 |
% |
Time deposits |
|
|
1,899,131 |
|
|
|
22,993 |
|
|
|
4.80 |
% |
|
|
1,510,526 |
|
|
|
16,428 |
|
|
|
4.31 |
% |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
and federal funds purchased |
|
|
64,130 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
3.28 |
% |
|
|
192,098 |
|
|
|
2,155 |
|
|
|
4.45 |
% |
Term debt |
|
|
75,045 |
|
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
4.62 |
% |
|
|
57,043 |
|
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
4.81 |
% |
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
232,289 |
|
|
|
4,444 |
|
|
|
7.59 |
% |
|
|
204,113 |
|
|
|
3,971 |
|
|
|
7.72 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
5,542,587 |
|
|
|
53,986 |
|
|
|
3.86 |
% |
|
|
4,701,582 |
|
|
|
40,939 |
|
|
|
3.45 |
% |
Non-interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
1,319,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,235,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
82,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
6,944,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,011,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
1,245,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,124,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity |
|
$ |
8,190,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,135,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INTEREST INCOME (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
74,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
74,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INTEREST SPREAD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.38 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.04 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AVERAGE YIELD ON EARNING ASSETS (1), (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE TO EARNING ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.04 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.66 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INTEREST INCOME TO EARNING ASSETS OR NET
INTEREST MARGIN (1), (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.83 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Non-accrual loans and mortgage loans held for sale are included in the average balance. |
|
(2) |
|
Tax-exempt income has been adjusted to a tax equivalent basis at a 35% tax rate. The amount of
such adjustment was an addition to recorded income of approximately $659,000 and $498,000 for the
three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
Temporary investments include federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits at other banks. |
28
Average Rates and Balances (Year-to-Date)
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Income or |
|
|
Yields |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Income or |
|
|
Yields |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
or Rates |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
or Rates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST-EARNING ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases (1) |
|
$ |
5,747,358 |
|
|
$ |
331,889 |
|
|
|
7.72 |
% |
|
$ |
4,637,525 |
|
|
$ |
265,444 |
|
|
|
7.65 |
% |
Taxable securities |
|
|
723,977 |
|
|
|
25,625 |
|
|
|
4.72 |
% |
|
|
604,448 |
|
|
|
20,406 |
|
|
|
4.50 |
% |
Non-taxable securities (2) |
|
|
142,443 |
|
|
|
5,869 |
|
|
|
5.49 |
% |
|
|
91,027 |
|
|
|
3,938 |
|
|
|
5.77 |
% |
Temporary investments (3) |
|
|
62,680 |
|
|
|
2,439 |
|
|
|
5.20 |
% |
|
|
27,360 |
|
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
4.09 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest earning assets |
|
|
6,676,458 |
|
|
|
365,822 |
|
|
|
7.33 |
% |
|
|
5,360,360 |
|
|
|
290,625 |
|
|
|
7.25 |
% |
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
(64,951 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,161 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,154,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
888,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
7,765,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,198,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing checking and
savings accounts |
|
$ |
3,061,157 |
|
|
$ |
91,911 |
|
|
|
4.01 |
% |
|
$ |
2,374,863 |
|
|
$ |
42,240 |
|
|
|
2.38 |
% |
Time deposits |
|
|
1,823,618 |
|
|
|
41,839 |
|
|
|
3.07 |
% |
|
|
1,308,552 |
|
|
|
38,872 |
|
|
|
3.97 |
% |
Federal funds purchased and repurchase
agreements |
|
|
69,069 |
|
|
|
1,757 |
|
|
|
3.40 |
% |
|
|
200,789 |
|
|
|
6,346 |
|
|
|
4.23 |
% |
Term debt |
|
|
51,592 |
|
|
|
1,767 |
|
|
|
4.58 |
% |
|
|
74,724 |
|
|
|
2,775 |
|
|
|
4.97 |
% |
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
216,816 |
|
|
|
12,329 |
|
|
|
7.60 |
% |
|
|
182,583 |
|
|
|
10,359 |
|
|
|
7.59 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
5,222,252 |
|
|
|
149,603 |
|
|
|
3.83 |
% |
|
|
4,141,511 |
|
|
|
100,592 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
% |
Non-interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
1,250,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,085,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
77,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
6,550,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,288,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
1,215,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
910,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity |
|
$ |
7,765,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,198,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INTEREST INCOME (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
216,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
190,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INTEREST SPREAD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AVERAGE YIELD ON EARNING ASSETS (1),
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE TO EARNING ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.51 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INTEREST INCOME TO EARNING ASSETS
OR NET INTEREST MARGIN (1), (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.74 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Non-accrual loans and mortgage loans held for sale are included in the average balance. |
|
(2) |
|
Tax-exempt income has been adjusted to a tax equivalent basis at a 35% tax rate. The amount of
such adjustment was an addition to recorded income of approximately $1.7 million and $1.2 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
Temporary investments include federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits at other banks. |
The following table sets forth a summary of the changes in tax equivalent net interest income
due to changes in average asset and liability balances (volume) and changes in average rates (rate)
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006.
Changes in tax equivalent interest income and expense, which are not attributable specifically to
either volume or rate, are allocated proportionately between both variances.
29
Rate/Volume Analysis (Quarterly)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 compared to 2006 |
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in interest income |
|
|
|
and expense due to changes in |
|
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
INTEREST-EARNING ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases |
|
$ |
13,350 |
|
|
$ |
(3,559 |
) |
|
$ |
9,791 |
|
Taxable securities |
|
|
1,862 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
2,331 |
|
Non-taxable securities (1) |
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
607 |
|
Temporary investments |
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (1) |
|
|
16,370 |
|
|
|
(3,086 |
) |
|
|
13,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing checking and
savings accounts |
|
|
3,784 |
|
|
|
3,668 |
|
|
|
7,452 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
4,559 |
|
|
|
2,006 |
|
|
|
6,565 |
|
Repurchase agreements and federal funds |
|
|
(1,165 |
) |
|
|
(460 |
) |
|
|
(1,625 |
) |
Term debt |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
182 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
7,929 |
|
|
|
5,118 |
|
|
|
13,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net interest income (1) |
|
$ |
8,441 |
|
|
$ |
(8,204 |
) |
|
$ |
237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Tax exempt income has been adjusted to a tax equivalent basis at a 35% tax rate. |
Rate/Volume Analysis (Year-to-Date)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 compared to 2006 |
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in interest income |
|
|
|
and expense due to changes in |
|
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
INTEREST-EARNING ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases |
|
$ |
64,069 |
|
|
$ |
2,376 |
|
|
$ |
66,445 |
|
Taxable securities |
|
|
4,193 |
|
|
|
1,026 |
|
|
|
5,219 |
|
Non-taxable securities (1) |
|
|
2,126 |
|
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
1,931 |
|
Temporary investments |
|
|
1,323 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
1,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (1) |
|
|
71,711 |
|
|
|
3,486 |
|
|
|
75,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing checking and
savings accounts |
|
|
14,691 |
|
|
|
34,980 |
|
|
|
49,671 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
13,094 |
|
|
|
(10,127 |
) |
|
|
2,967 |
|
Repurchase agreements and federal funds |
|
|
(3,537 |
) |
|
|
(1,052 |
) |
|
|
(4,589 |
) |
Term debt |
|
|
(805 |
) |
|
|
(203 |
) |
|
|
(1,008 |
) |
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
1,947 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
1,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
25,390 |
|
|
|
23,621 |
|
|
|
49,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net interest income (1) |
|
$ |
46,321 |
|
|
$ |
(20,135 |
) |
|
$ |
26,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Tax exempt income has been adjusted to a tax equivalent basis at a 35% tax rate. |
30
PROVISION FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES
The provision for loan and lease losses was $20.4 million and $23.9 million for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2007, compared to $2.4 million for the same periods in 2006. As an
annualized percentage of average outstanding loans, the provision for loan losses recorded for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 was 1.34% and 0.56% as compared to 0.17% and 0.07%
in the same periods in 2006.
The increase in the provision for loan and lease losses in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007 as compared to the same periods in 2006 is principally attributable to an
increase in non-performing loans and leases related primarily to deterioration in the northern
California residential development market and growth in the loan and lease portfolio. Within the
allowance for credit losses, the Company has identified $16.2 million of impairment reserve related
to $67.4 million of non-accrual loans, which are specifically measured for impairment. The net
increase in impairment reserve, combined with downgrades within the portfolio related primarily to
residential development, led to the $20.4 million and $23.9 million provision for loan and leases
losses during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007. The third quarter provision for
loan losses is expected to cover subsequent charge-offs on these non-performing loans.
The provision for loan and lease losses is based on managements evaluation of inherent risks in
the loan portfolio and a corresponding analysis of the allowance for loan and lease losses.
Additional discussion on loan quality and the allowance for loan and lease losses is provided under
the heading Asset Quality and Non-Performing Assets below.
NON-INTEREST INCOME
Non-interest income in the three months ended September 30, 2007 was $18.5 million, an increase of
$5.1 million, or 38%, as compared to the same period in 2006. Non-interest income in the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 was $48.4 million, an increase of $9.0 million, or 23%, as compared
to the same period in 2006. The following table presents the key components of non-interest income
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006:
Non-Interest Income
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
$ |
8,448 |
|
|
$ |
7,606 |
|
|
$ |
842 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
$ |
23,648 |
|
|
$ |
19,540 |
|
|
$ |
4,108 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
Brokerage commissions and fees |
|
|
2,498 |
|
|
|
2,506 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
7,594 |
|
|
|
7,408 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Mortgage banking revenue, net |
|
|
1,366 |
|
|
|
1,445 |
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
-5 |
% |
|
|
5,772 |
|
|
|
5,792 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
0 |
% |
Net loss on sale of investment
securities |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
NM |
Other income |
|
|
6,244 |
|
|
|
1,919 |
|
|
|
4,325 |
|
|
|
225 |
% |
|
|
11,434 |
|
|
|
6,745 |
|
|
|
4,689 |
|
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
18,543 |
|
|
$ |
13,476 |
|
|
$ |
5,067 |
|
|
|
38 |
% |
|
$ |
48,438 |
|
|
$ |
39,484 |
|
|
$ |
8,954 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM Not meaningful
The increase in deposit service charges in 2007 over the same period in 2006 is principally
attributable to increased volume of deposit accounts. Brokerage commission and fees was relatively
unchanged as compared to the same periods in 2006. Mortgage banking revenue was comparable to the
same periods in 2006 despite the slowdown in the mortgage market. The increase in other income over
the same periods in 2006 was primarily related to gains of $4.1 million and $4.7 million in the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, resulting from the change in fair
value of the junior subordinated debentures recorded at fair value as a result of the fair value
measurement election. Additional information regarding the fair value election for the junior
subordinated debentures is included in Note 4 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE
Non-interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2007 was $52.9 million, an increase
of $2.2 million or 4% compared to the three months ended September 30, 2006. Non-interest expense
for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $156.9 million, an increase of $23.9 million or
18% compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The following table presents the key
elements of non-interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006.
31
Non-Interest Expense
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Salaries and employee
benefits |
|
$ |
28,005 |
|
|
$ |
26,387 |
|
|
$ |
1,618 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
$ |
85,172 |
|
|
$ |
71,525 |
|
|
$ |
13,647 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
Net occupancy and
equipment |
|
|
9,166 |
|
|
|
8,540 |
|
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
26,774 |
|
|
|
22,907 |
|
|
|
3,867 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
Communications |
|
|
1,807 |
|
|
|
1,744 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
5,293 |
|
|
|
4,689 |
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Marketing |
|
|
1,982 |
|
|
|
1,780 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
4,405 |
|
|
|
4,596 |
|
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
-4 |
% |
Services |
|
|
4,864 |
|
|
|
4,199 |
|
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
14,066 |
|
|
|
11,016 |
|
|
|
3,050 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
Supplies |
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
2,572 |
|
|
|
2,276 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Intangible amortization |
|
|
1,767 |
|
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
4,400 |
|
|
|
2,533 |
|
|
|
1,867 |
|
|
|
74 |
% |
Merger-related expenses |
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
2,451 |
|
|
|
(2,188 |
) |
|
|
-89 |
% |
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
|
4,358 |
|
|
|
(1,158 |
) |
|
|
-27 |
% |
Other |
|
|
4,055 |
|
|
|
3,465 |
|
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
10,968 |
|
|
|
9,009 |
|
|
|
1,959 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
52,893 |
|
|
$ |
50,686 |
|
|
$ |
2,207 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
$ |
156,850 |
|
|
$ |
132,909 |
|
|
$ |
23,941 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits have increased due to increased incentives, benefit costs,
additional staff at new stores, and primarily the addition of approximately 250 associates in June
2006 due to the Western Sierra acquisition and approximately 110 associates in April 2007 due to
the North Bay acquisition. Net occupancy and equipment increased reflecting 10 new banking
locations as a result of the North Bay acquisition in April 2007, 31 new banking locations as a
result of the Western Sierra acquisition in June 2006 and the addition of 7 de novo branches in
2006. The increase in services expense was primarily due to increased escrow accounting fees and
higher consulting fees. The increase in intangible amortization is due to the increase in core
deposit and other intangibles as a result of the Western Sierra and North Bay acquisitions. We
also incur significant expenses in connection with the completion and integration of bank
acquisitions that are not capitalizable. Classification of expenses as merger-related is done in
accordance with the provisions of a Board-approved policy. The decrease in merger-related expenses
in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 is due to the difference in timing and size
of the Western Sierra and North Bay mergers.
INCOME TAXES
Our consolidated effective tax rate as a percentage of pre-tax income for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007 was 31.0% and 34.6%, compared to 33.2% and 35.6% for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2006. The effective tax rates were below the federal statutory rate of
35% and the apportioned state rate of 5% (net of the federal tax benefit) principally because of
non-taxable income arising from bank-owned life insurance, income on tax-exempt investment
securities, tax credits arising from low income housing investments, Business Energy tax credits
and exemptions related to loans and hiring in designated enterprise zones.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Trading securities consist of securities held in inventory by Strand for sale to its clients and
securities invested in trust for former employees of acquired institutions as required by
agreements. Trading securities were $4.1 million at September 30, 2007, as compared to $4.2 million
at December 31, 2006.
Investment securities available for sale were $911.9 million as of September 30, 2007, as compared
to $715.2 million at December 31, 2006. This increase is principally attributable to the North Bay
acquisition ($85.6 million of investment securities as of the acquisition date) and purchases of
$219.3 million of investment securities, partially offset by sales and maturities of $110.5 million
of investment securities available for sale and an increase in fair value of investment securities
available for sale of $2.7 million.
Investment securities held to maturity were $7.1 million as of September 30, 2007, as compared to
$8.8 million at December 31, 2006. This decrease is principally attributable to sales and
maturities of investment securities held to maturity.
The following table presents the available for sale and held to maturity investment securities
portfolio by major type as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006:
32
Investment Securities Composition
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Securities Available for Sale |
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
% |
|
Fair Value |
|
% |
U.S. Treasury and agencies |
|
$ |
166,682 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
$ |
193,134 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized
mortgage obligations |
|
|
533,048 |
|
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
362,882 |
|
|
|
51 |
% |
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions |
|
|
161,757 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
110,219 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Other debt securities |
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
Investments in mutual funds and other equity
securities |
|
|
49,426 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
47,979 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
911,883 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
715,187 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Securities Held to Maturity |
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
% |
|
Cost |
|
% |
Obligations of states and |
|
$ |
6,499 |
|
|
|
92 |
% |
|
$ |
8,015 |
|
|
|
92 |
% |
political subdivisions
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized
mortgage obligations |
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Other investment securities |
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,116 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
8,762 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
LOANS AND LEASES
Total loans and leases outstanding at September 30, 2007 were $6.1 billion, an increase of $717.6
million as compared to year-end 2006. The growth in loans was due to the North Bay acquisition
($443.0 million of loans as of the acquisition date) and organic loan growth of $274.6 million, or
7% annualized, primarily in the Oregon/Washington region. The following tables present the
concentration distribution of our loan portfolio and our loan portfolio by region at September 30,
2007 and December 31, 2006:
Loan Concentrations
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
Amount |
|
Percentage |
|
Amount |
|
Percentage |
Construction and development |
|
$ |
1,113,842 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
% |
|
$ |
1,189,090 |
|
|
|
22.2 |
% |
Farmland |
|
|
116,116 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
77,283 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
Home equity credit lines |
|
|
201,959 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
152,962 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
Single family first lien mortgage |
|
|
210,070 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
178,159 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
Single family second lien |
|
|
28,345 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
30,554 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
mortgage
Multifamily |
|
|
152,668 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
162,040 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
Commercial real estate |
|
|
3,033,464 |
|
|
|
49.9 |
% |
|
|
2,572,186 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate secured |
|
|
4,856,464 |
|
|
|
79.9 |
% |
|
|
4,362,274 |
|
|
|
81.4 |
% |
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
1,068,513 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
% |
|
|
874,264 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
% |
Agricultural production |
|
|
69,134 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
50,653 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
Consumer |
|
|
37,562 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
42,417 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
Leases |
|
|
37,095 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
22,870 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
Other |
|
|
22,085 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
20,845 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
Deferred loan fees, net |
|
|
(11,418 |
) |
|
|
-0.2 |
% |
|
|
(11,461 |
) |
|
|
-0.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
6,079,435 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
5,361,862 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
33
Loans by Region
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
Amount |
|
Mix |
|
Amount |
|
Mix |
|
|
|
|
|
Oregon/Washington |
|
$ |
3,452,645 |
|
|
|
57 |
% |
|
$ |
3,168,596 |
|
|
|
59 |
% |
California |
|
|
2,626,790 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
2,193,266 |
|
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loans |
|
$ |
6,079,435 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
5,361,862 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSET QUALITY AND NON-PERFORMING ASSETS
Non-performing loans, which include non-accrual loans and accruing loans past due over 90 days,
totaled $68.9 million, or 1.13% of total loans, at September 30, 2007, as compared to $9.1 million,
or 0.17% of total loans, at December 31, 2006. Non-performing assets, which include non-performing
loans and foreclosed real estate (other real estate owned), totaled $79.2 million, or 0.96% of
total assets, as of September 30, 2007, as compared to $9.1 million, or 0.12% of total assets, as
of December 31, 2006. The increase in non-performing assets in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007 related primarily to deterioration in the northern California residential
development market.
Loans are classified as non-accrual when collection of principal or interest is doubtfulgenerally
if they are past due as to maturity or payment of principal or interest by 90 days or moreunless
such loans are well-secured and in the process of collection. Additionally, all loans that are
impaired in accordance with SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for the Impairment of a Loan,
are considered for non-accrual status. These loans will typically remain on non-accrual status
until all principal and interest payments are brought current and the prospects for future payments
in accordance with the loan agreement appear relatively certain. Foreclosed properties held as
other real estate owned are recorded at the lower of the recorded investment in the loan or market
value of the property less expected selling costs. Other real estate owned at September 30, 2007
totaled $10.3 million and consisted of two properties. Subsequent to September 30, 2007, the
Company sold $10.0 million of other real estate owned with no loss recognized.
The following table summarizes our non-performing assets as of September 30, 2007 and December 31,
2006.
Non-Performing Assets
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Loans on nonaccrual status |
|
$ |
67,419 |
|
|
$ |
8,629 |
|
Loans past due 90 days or more and accruing |
|
|
1,488 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
|
68,907 |
|
|
|
9,058 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
10,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
79,217 |
|
|
$ |
9,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
88,278 |
|
|
$ |
60,090 |
|
Reserve for unfunded commitments |
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses |
|
$ |
89,524 |
|
|
$ |
61,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset quality ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing assets to total assets |
|
|
0.96 |
% |
|
|
0.12 |
% |
Non-performing loans to total loans |
|
|
1.13 |
% |
|
|
0.17 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to total loans |
|
|
1.45 |
% |
|
|
1.12 |
% |
Allowance for credit losses to total loans |
|
|
1.47 |
% |
|
|
1.15 |
% |
Allowance for credit losses to total
non-performing loans |
|
|
130 |
% |
|
|
678 |
% |
The following table summarizes our non-performing assets by region as of September 30, 2007.
34
Non-Performing Assets by Region
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oregon/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington |
|
|
California |
|
|
Total |
|
Loans on nonaccrual status |
|
$ |
17,914 |
|
|
$ |
49,505 |
|
|
$ |
67,419 |
|
Loans past due 90 days or more and accruing |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
1,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
|
18,067 |
|
|
|
50,840 |
|
|
|
68,907 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
10,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
28,067 |
|
|
$ |
51,150 |
|
|
$ |
79,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2007, there were no loans classified as restructured as compared to $8.0 million
at December 31, 2006. The restructurings were granted in response to borrower financial difficulty,
and generally provide for a temporary modification of loan repayment terms. Substantially all of
the restructured loans as of December 31, 2006 were classified as impaired. None of the
restructured loans were classified as non-accrual loans as of December 31, 2006.
A decline in the economic conditions in our general market areas or other factors could adversely
impact individual borrowers or the loan portfolio in general. Accordingly, there can be no
assurance that loans will not become 90 days or more past due, become impaired or placed on
non-accrual status, restructured or transferred to other real estate owned in the future.
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES AND RESERVE FOR UNFUNDED COMMITMENTS
The allowance for loan and lease losses (ALLL) totaled $88.3 million at September 30, 2007, an
increase from the $60.1 million at December 31, 2006. The following table shows the activity in the
ALLL for the three and nine months ending September 30, 2007 and 2006:
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
68,723 |
|
|
$ |
58,516 |
|
|
$ |
60,090 |
|
|
$ |
43,885 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
5,078 |
|
|
|
14,227 |
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
20,420 |
|
|
|
2,352 |
|
|
|
23,916 |
|
|
|
2,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans charged-off |
|
|
(1,414 |
) |
|
|
(1,027 |
) |
|
|
(2,997 |
) |
|
|
(2,587 |
) |
Charge-off recoveries |
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
2,191 |
|
|
|
2,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
(865 |
) |
|
|
(577 |
) |
|
|
(806 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
88,278 |
|
|
|
60,475 |
|
|
|
88,278 |
|
|
|
60,475 |
|
Reserve for unfunded commitments |
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
2,021 |
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
2,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses |
|
$ |
89,524 |
|
|
$ |
62,496 |
|
|
$ |
89,524 |
|
|
$ |
62,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of average loans and leases (annualized): |
Net charge-offs |
|
|
0.06 |
% |
|
|
0.04 |
% |
|
|
0.02 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
1.34 |
% |
|
|
0.17 |
% |
|
|
0.56 |
% |
|
|
0.07 |
% |
The increase in the allowance for loan and lease losses as of September 30, 2007 is principally
attributable to an increase in provision for loan and lease losses during the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007 as compared to the same periods in 2006. Additional discussion on the
increase in provision for loan and lease losses is provided under the heading Provision for Loan
and Lease Losses above.
The following table presents a summary of activity in the reserve for unfunded commitments (RUC):
35
Summary of Reserve for Unfunded Commitments Activity
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
1,273 |
|
|
$ |
2,145 |
|
|
$ |
1,313 |
|
|
$ |
1,601 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
Net (decrease) increase charged to other expenses |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
(201 |
) |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
1,246 |
|
|
$ |
2,021 |
|
|
$ |
1,246 |
|
|
$ |
2,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe that the ALLL and RUC at September 30, 2007 are sufficient to absorb losses inherent in
the loan portfolio and credit commitments outstanding as of that date, respectively, based on the
best information available. This assessment, based in part on historical levels of net charge-offs,
loan growth, and a detailed review of the quality of the loan portfolio, involves uncertainty and
judgment. Therefore, the adequacy of the ALLL and RUC cannot be determined with precision and may
be subject to change in future periods. In addition, bank regulatory authorities, as part of their
periodic examination of the Bank, may require additional charges to the provision for loan and
lease losses in future periods if warranted as a result of their review.
MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS
The following table presents the key elements of our mortgage servicing rights asset:
Summary of Mortgage Servicing Rights
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Balance, beginning of period(1) |
|
$ |
9,966 |
|
|
$ |
11,550 |
|
|
$ |
9,952 |
|
|
$ |
10,890 |
|
Additions for new mortgage servicing rights capitalized |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
1,337 |
|
Changes in fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to changes in model inputs or assumptions(2) |
|
|
(220 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other(3) |
|
|
(428 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,652 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(933 |
) |
Impairment charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,056 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(867 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
9,474 |
|
|
$ |
10,427 |
|
|
$ |
9,474 |
|
|
$ |
10,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of loans serviced for others |
|
$ |
877,648 |
|
|
$ |
978,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSR as a percentage of serviced loans |
|
|
1.08 |
% |
|
|
1.07 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents fair value as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 and amortized cost as of June
30, 2006
and December 31, 2005, which approximated fair value. |
|
(2) |
|
Principally reflects changes in discount rates and prepayment speed assumptions, which are
primarily
affected by changes in interest rates. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents changes due to collection/realization of expected cash flows over time. |
As of September 30, 2007, we serviced residential mortgage loans for others with an aggregate
outstanding principal balance of $877.6 million for which servicing assets have been recorded.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No.156 on January 1, 2007, the servicing asset recorded at the time
of sale was amortized over the term of, and in proportion to, net servicing revenues. Subsequent to
adoption, the mortgage servicing rights are adjusted to fair value quarterly with the change
recorded in mortgage banking revenue.
We plan to start hedging the fair value change of the MSR portfolio starting in the fourth quarter
of 2007 with a goal of minimizing the volatility to earnings in the future.
GOODWILL AND CORE DEPOSIT INTANGIBLE ASSETS
At September 30, 2007, we had goodwill and other intangible assets of $723.8 million and $43.4
million, respectively, as compared to $645.9 million and $33.6 million, respectively, at year-end
2006. This increase in goodwill is primarily a result of the North Bay acquisition. The goodwill
recorded in connection with the North Bay acquisition represented the excess of the purchase price
over the
36
estimated fair value of the net assets acquired. A portion of the purchase price was allocated to
the value of North Bays core deposits, which included all deposits except certificates of deposit
and merchant servicing portfolio. The value of the core deposits was determined by a third party
based on an analysis of the cost differential between the core deposits and alternative funding
sources.
We amortize core deposit intangible assets on an accelerated or straight-line basis over an
estimated ten-year life. Substantially all of the goodwill is associated with our community banking
operations. We evaluate goodwill for possible impairment on a quarterly basis and there were no
impairments recorded for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006.
DEPOSITS
Total deposits were $6.5 billion at September 30, 2007, an increase of $677.9 million as compared
to year-end 2006. The growth in deposits was principally due to the North Bay acquisition ($462.6
million of deposits as of the acquisition date). Organic deposit growth during the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 was $215.3 million (5% annualized organic growth), primarily in the
Oregon/Washington region. Management attributes this growth to ongoing business development and
marketing efforts in our service markets. Information on average deposit balances and average rates
paid is included under the Net Interest Income section of this report.
The following table presents the deposit balances by major category as of September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006:
Deposits
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
1,294,334 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
$ |
1,222,107 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
Interest bearing demand |
|
|
783,558 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
725,127 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Savings and money market |
|
|
2,525,873 |
|
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
2,133,497 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
Time, $100,000 or greater |
|
|
1,064,189 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
898,617 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Time, less than $100,000 |
|
|
850,263 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
860,946 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,518,217 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
5,840,294 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the deposit balances by region as of September 30, 2007 and December
31, 2006:
Deposits by Region
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
Amount |
|
Mix |
|
Amount |
|
Mix |
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits by region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oregon/Washington |
|
$ |
3,700,826 |
|
|
|
57 |
% |
|
$ |
3,500,965 |
|
|
|
60 |
% |
California |
|
|
2,817,391 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
2,339,329 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Depoits |
|
$ |
6,518,217 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
5,840,294 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposits: (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oregon/Washington |
|
$ |
3,183,550 |
|
|
|
58 |
% |
|
$ |
3,030,449 |
|
|
|
61 |
% |
California |
|
|
2,270,478 |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
1,911,228 |
|
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Core deposits |
|
$ |
5,454,028 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
4,941,677 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
% of total deposits |
|
|
84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Core deposits are defined as total deposits less time deposits greater than $100,000. |
BORROWINGS
At September 30, 2007, the Bank had outstanding $52.9 million of securities sold under agreements
to repurchase and $20.0 million of federal funds purchased. The Bank had outstanding term debt of
$75.0 million at September 30, 2007. Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) amounted to
$74.1 million of the total and are secured by investment securities and residential mortgage loans.
The FHLB advances outstanding at September 30, 2007 had fixed interest rates ranging from 3.25% to
7.44% and $1.0 million, or 1%, mature prior to December 31, 2007, while another $42.0 million, or
57%, mature prior to December 31, 2008. Management expects continued use of FHLB advances as a
source of short and long-term funding.
37
JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES
We had junior subordinated debentures with carrying values of $236.9 million and $203.7 million,
respectively, at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006. Umpqua early adopted SFAS No. 159 and
selected the fair value measurement option for certain junior subordinated debentures not acquired
through acquisitions and new junior subordinated debentures issued in 2007.
At September 30, 2007, approximately $191.8 million, or 83% of the total issued amount, had
interest rates that are adjustable on a quarterly basis based on a spread over LIBOR. Increases in
short-term market interest rates during 2006 have resulted in increased interest expense for junior
subordinated debentures. Although any additional increases in short-term market interest rates will
increase the interest expense for junior subordinated debentures, we believe that other attributes
of our balance sheet will serve to mitigate the impact to net interest income on a consolidated
basis.
All of the debentures issued to the Trusts, less the common stock of the Trusts, qualified as Tier
1 capital as of September 30, 2007, under guidance issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System. Additional information regarding the terms of the junior subordinated debentures,
including maturity/redemption dates, interest rates and the adoption of SFAS No. 159, is included
in Note 4 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
LIQUIDITY AND CASH FLOW
The principal objective of our liquidity management program is to maintain the Banks ability to
meet the day-to-day cash flow requirements of our customers who either wish to withdraw funds or to
draw upon credit facilities to meet their cash needs.
We monitor the sources and uses of funds on a daily basis to maintain an acceptable liquidity
position. In addition to liquidity from core deposits and the repayments and maturities of loans
and investment securities, the Bank can utilize established uncommitted federal funds lines of
credit, sell securities under agreements to repurchase, borrow on a secured basis from the FHLB or
issue brokered certificates of deposit.
The Bank had available lines of credit with the FHLB totaling $1.6 billion at September 30, 2007.
The Bank had uncommitted federal funds line of credit agreements with additional financial
institutions totaling $240.0 million at September 30, 2007. Availability of lines is subject to
federal funds balances available for loan and continued borrower eligibility. These lines are
intended to support short-term liquidity needs, and the agreements may restrict consecutive day
usage.
The Company is a separate entity from the Bank and must provide for its own liquidity.
Substantially all of the Companys revenues are obtained from dividends declared and paid by the
Bank. In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Bank paid the Company $12.0
million and $32.0 million in dividends to fund regular operations. The Bank also paid the Company
$60.0 million in special dividends to fund share repurchases during the second quarter. There are
statutory and regulatory provisions that could limit the ability of the Bank to pay dividends to
the Company. We believe that such restrictions will not have an adverse impact on the ability of
the Company to fund its quarterly cash dividend distributions to shareholders and meet its ongoing
cash obligations, which consist principally of debt service on the $230.1 million (issued amount)
of outstanding junior subordinated debentures. As of September 30, 2007, the Company did not have
any borrowing arrangements of its own.
As disclosed in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, net cash provided by operating
activities was $56.7 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The principal source
of cash provided by operating activities was net income. Net cash of $307.4 million used in
investing activities consisted principally of $281.8 million of net loan growth and purchases of
investment securities available for sale of $219.3 million, partially offset by sales and
maturities of investment securities of $112.1 million and cash acquired in the North Bay merger,
net of cash consideration paid, of $78.7 million. The $110.2 million of cash provided by financing
activities primarily consisted of $215.2 million of net deposit increases, $60.0 million in
proceeds on issuance of junior subordinated debentures, and $24.9 million increase in securities
sold under agreements to repurchase and Federal funds purchased, partially offset by $96.1 million
in stock repurchases, $69.7 million in repayment of term debt and junior subordinated debentures
and $32.1 million in dividend payments.
Although we expect the Banks and the Companys liquidity positions to remain satisfactory during
2007, increases in market interest rates have resulted in increased competition for bank deposits.
It is possible that our deposit growth for 2007 may not be maintained at previous levels due to
increased pricing pressure or, in order to generate deposit growth, our pricing may need to be
adjusted in a manner that results in increased interest expense on deposits.
OFF-BALANCE-SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Information regarding Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements is included in Note 5 of the Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
38
CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK
Information regarding Concentrations of Credit Risk is included in Note 5 of the Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
CAPITAL RESOURCES
Shareholders equity at September 30, 2007 was $1.2 billion, an increase of $77.0 million, or 7%,
from December 31, 2006. The increase in shareholders equity during the nine months ended September
30, 2007 was principally due to the issuance of shares in connection with the North Bay acquisition
valued at $142.1 million, shares issued in connection with stock plans and related tax benefit of
$8.0 million, and retention of $20.8 million, or approximately 39%, of net income for the nine
month period, partially offset by stock repurchases of $96.1 million.
The following table shows Umpqua Holdings consolidated and Umpqua Bank capital adequacy ratios, as
calculated under regulatory guidelines, compared to the regulatory minimum capital ratio and the
regulatory minimum capital ratio needed to qualify as a well-capitalized institution at September
30, 2007 and December 31, 2006:
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital |
|
To be Well |
|
|
Actual |
|
Adequacy purposes |
|
Capitalized |
|
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
As of September 30, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(to Risk Weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
767,649 |
|
|
|
10.83 |
% |
|
$ |
567,054 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
$ |
708,817 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
Umpqua Bank |
|
$ |
756,643 |
|
|
|
10.70 |
% |
|
$ |
565,714 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
$ |
707,143 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
Tier I Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(to Risk Weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
694,368 |
|
|
|
9.80 |
% |
|
$ |
283,416 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
$ |
425,123 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Umpqua Bank |
|
$ |
683,362 |
|
|
|
9.66 |
% |
|
$ |
282,966 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
$ |
424,448 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Tier I Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(to Average Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
694,368 |
|
|
|
9.35 |
% |
|
$ |
297,056 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
$ |
371,320 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
Umpqua Bank |
|
$ |
683,362 |
|
|
|
9.21 |
% |
|
$ |
296,791 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
$ |
370,989 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(to Risk Weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
733,239 |
|
|
|
11.63 |
% |
|
$ |
504,378 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
$ |
630,472 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
Umpqua Bank |
|
$ |
715,593 |
|
|
|
11.37 |
% |
|
$ |
503,496 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
$ |
629,369 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
Tier I Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(to Risk Weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
671,836 |
|
|
|
10.66 |
% |
|
$ |
252,096 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
$ |
378,144 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Umpqua Bank |
|
$ |
654,190 |
|
|
|
10.39 |
% |
|
$ |
251,854 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
$ |
377,781 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Tier I Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(to Average Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
671,836 |
|
|
|
10.28 |
% |
|
$ |
261,415 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
$ |
326,769 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
Umpqua Bank |
|
$ |
654,190 |
|
|
|
10.02 |
% |
|
$ |
261,154 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
$ |
326,442 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
The following table presents cash dividends declared and dividend payout ratios (dividends declared
per share divided by basic earnings per share) for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2007 and 2006:
Cash Dividends and Payout Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Dividend declared per share |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
Dividend payout ratio |
|
|
86 |
% |
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
61 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
39
On April 19, 2007, the Company announced an expansion of the Board of Directors approved common
stock repurchase plan, increasing the repurchase limit to 6.0 million shares and extending the
plans expiration date from June 30, 2007 to June 30, 2009. As of September 30, 2007, a total of
1.5 million shares remained available for repurchase. Shares repurchased in open market
transactions during the third quarter of 2007 were 1,648,426. The timing and amount of future
repurchases will depend upon the market price for our common stock, securities laws restricting
repurchases, asset growth, earnings and our capital plan. In addition, our stock plans provide that
option and award holders may pay for the exercise price and tax withholdings in part or whole by
tendering previously held shares.
On July 19, 2007, the Company announced plans to issue $130 million of new trust preferred
securities over the next four months and to use the proceeds to redeem $75 million of trust
preferred securities related to three Trusts during the third and fourth quarters; to fund
previously announced share repurchases; and, for other corporate purposes. Of the $61.9 million in
new trust preferred securities issued in the third quarter, the Company used $25.8 million of the
proceeds to redeem trust preferred securities issued by one Trust and the remainder to repurchase
1.65 million shares of common stock. On October 18, 2007, the Company announced that it intended to
put on hold plans to issue additional trust preferred securities for at least another quarter until
there is improvement in the credit markets.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Our assessment of market risk as of September 30, 2007 indicates there are no material changes in
the quantitative and qualitative disclosures from those in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2006.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer, has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in
timely alerting them to information relating to us that is required to be included in our periodic
SEC filings. The disclosure controls and procedures were last evaluated by management as of
September 30, 2007.
There have been no changes in our internal controls or in other factors that have materially
affected or are likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting
subsequent to the date of the evaluation.
40
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Because of the nature of our business, we are involved in legal proceedings in the regular course
of business. At this time, we do not believe that there is pending litigation the unfavorable
outcome of which would result in a material adverse change to our financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the risk factors as of September 30, 2007 from those
presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2006, except as noted in the Forward Looking
Statements discussion under Part I, Item 2 of this report.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a) Not Applicable
(b) Not Applicable
(c) The following table provides information about repurchases of common stock by the Company
during the quarter ended September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
of Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as |
|
Shares that May |
|
|
Total number |
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
be Purchased at |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Average Price |
|
Announced Plan |
|
Period End under |
Period |
|
Purchased (1) |
|
Paid per Share |
|
(2) |
|
the Plan |
7/1/07 - 7/31/07 |
|
|
8,750 |
|
|
$ |
20.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,191,371 |
|
8/1/07 - 8/31/07 |
|
|
1,656,595 |
|
|
$ |
21.24 |
|
|
|
1,648,426 |
|
|
|
1,542,945 |
|
9/1/07 - 9/30/07 |
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
20.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,542,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total for quarter |
|
|
1,666,120 |
|
|
$ |
21.23 |
|
|
|
1,648,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Shares repurchased by the Company during the quarter consist of 1,648,426 shares
repurchased pursuant to the Companys publicly announced corporate stock repurchase plan described
in (2) below, cancellation of 1,059 restricted shares to pay withholding taxes and 16,635 shares
tendered in connection with option exercises.
(2) The repurchase plan, which was approved by the Board and announced in August 2003, originally
authorized the repurchase of up to 1.0 million shares. The authorization was amended to increase
the repurchase limit initially to 1.5 million shares and subsequently to 2.5 million shares. On
April 19, 2007, the Company announced an expansion of the repurchase plan by increasing the
repurchase limit to 6.0 million shares and extending the plans expiration date to June 30, 2009.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not Applicable
Item 4. Submissions of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
(a) |
|
Not Applicable |
|
(b) |
|
Not Applicable |
|
(c) |
|
Not Applicable |
|
(d) |
|
Not Applicable |
Item 5. Other Information
(a) Not Applicable
41
(b) Not Applicable
Item 6. Exhibits
The exhibits filed as part of this Report and exhibits incorporated herein by reference to other
documents are listed in the Exhibit Index to this Report, which follows the signature page.
42
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated November 6, 2007
|
|
/s/ Raymond P. Davis
Raymond P. Davis
President and
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated November 6, 2007
|
|
/s/ Ronald L. Farnsworth
Ronald L. Farnsworth
Senior Vice President/Finance and
Principal Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated November 6, 2007
|
|
/s/ Neal T. McLaughlin
Neal T. McLaughlin
Senior Vice President/Controller and
Principal Accounting Officer
|
|
|
43
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
3.1
|
|
(a) Restated Articles of Incorporation |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
(b) Bylaws, as amended |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
(c) Specimen Stock Certificate |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
(d) Amended and Restated Trust Agreement dated August 9, 2007 |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
(e) Indenture, dated August 9, 2007, by and between Umpqua Holdings Corporation and LaSalle Bank National Association |
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
(f) Guarantee Agreement, dated August 9, 2007, by and between Umpqua Holdings Corporation and LaSalle Bank National
Association |
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
(g) Series B Guarantee Agreement, dated September 6, 2007, by and between Umpqua Holdings Corporation and LaSalle
Bank National Association |
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
(h) Series B Supplement pursuant to Amended and Restated Trust Agreement dated August 9, 2007 |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.3
|
|
Certification of Principal Accounting Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-Q filed August 7, 2006
|
|
(b) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Form 10-Q filed May 8, 2007 |
|
(c) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-77259) filed
April 28, 1999 |
|
(d) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed August 10, 2007 |
|
(e) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed August 10, 2007 |
|
(f) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed August 10, 2007 |
|
(g) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed September 7, 2007 |
|
(h) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K filed September 7, 2007 |
44