e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 28, 2008.
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 1-7685
AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
95-1492269 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
incorporation or organization) |
|
|
|
|
|
150 North Orange Grove Boulevard |
|
|
Pasadena, California
|
|
91103 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (626) 304-2000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Number of shares of $1 par value common stock outstanding as of July 26, 2008: 106,488,295
AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION
FISCAL SECOND QUARTER 2008 FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
Avery Dennison Corporation
PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
|
December 29, 2007 |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
87.1 |
|
|
$ |
71.5 |
|
Trade accounts receivable, less allowances of $65.1 and $64.2 at June
28, 2008 and December 29, 2007, respectively |
|
|
1,232.8 |
|
|
|
1,113.8 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
679.1 |
|
|
|
631.0 |
|
Current deferred and refundable income taxes |
|
|
162.3 |
|
|
|
128.1 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
139.7 |
|
|
|
113.9 |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
2,301.0 |
|
|
|
2,058.3 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
3,340.5 |
|
|
|
3,195.9 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(1,722.3 |
) |
|
|
(1,604.5 |
) |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
1,618.2 |
|
|
|
1,591.4 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,825.4 |
|
|
|
1,683.3 |
|
Other intangibles resulting from business acquisitions, net |
|
|
313.1 |
|
|
|
314.2 |
|
Non-current deferred and refundable income taxes |
|
|
82.6 |
|
|
|
59.9 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
557.5 |
|
|
|
537.7 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,697.8 |
|
|
$ |
6,244.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term and current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
825.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,110.8 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
797.8 |
|
|
|
679.2 |
|
Current deferred and payable income taxes |
|
|
43.8 |
|
|
|
31.4 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
641.9 |
|
|
|
656.2 |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
2,309.3 |
|
|
|
2,477.6 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,545.4 |
|
|
|
1,145.0 |
|
Long-term retirement benefits and other liabilities |
|
|
395.7 |
|
|
|
391.5 |
|
Non-current deferred and payable income taxes |
|
|
248.3 |
|
|
|
241.3 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 16) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $1 par value, authorized - 400,000,000 shares at June
28, 2008 and December 29, 2007; issued - 124,126,624 shares at June
28, 2008 and December 29, 2007; outstanding - 98,487,529 shares and
98,386,897 shares at June 28, 2008 and December 29, 2007, respectively |
|
|
124.1 |
|
|
|
124.1 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
723.7 |
|
|
|
781.1 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
2,363.4 |
|
|
|
2,290.2 |
|
Cost of unallocated ESOP shares |
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
Employee stock benefit trusts, 7,963,266 shares and 8,063,898 shares at
June 28, 2008 and December 29, 2007, respectively |
|
|
(345.4 |
) |
|
|
(428.8 |
) |
Treasury stock at cost, 17,645,829 shares at June 28, 2008 and December
29, 2007 |
|
|
(858.2 |
) |
|
|
(858.2 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
195.3 |
|
|
|
84.8 |
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
2,199.1 |
|
|
|
1,989.4 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,697.8 |
|
|
$ |
6,244.8 |
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
3
Avery Dennison Corporation
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,828.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,523.5 |
|
|
$ |
3,474.1 |
|
|
$ |
2,913.4 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
1,338.6 |
|
|
|
1,113.1 |
|
|
|
2,559.8 |
|
|
|
2,138.7 |
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
490.3 |
|
|
|
410.4 |
|
|
|
914.3 |
|
|
|
774.7 |
|
Marketing, general and administrative expense |
|
|
341.0 |
|
|
|
270.8 |
|
|
|
669.0 |
|
|
|
519.1 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
29.3 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
58.8 |
|
|
|
35.2 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
114.2 |
|
|
|
112.0 |
|
|
|
175.1 |
|
|
|
210.8 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
45.5 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
92.4 |
|
|
$ |
86.2 |
|
|
$ |
160.8 |
|
|
$ |
165.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share |
|
$ |
.94 |
|
|
$ |
.88 |
|
|
$ |
1.63 |
|
|
$ |
1.69 |
|
|
Net income per common share, assuming dilution |
|
$ |
.93 |
|
|
$ |
.87 |
|
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
|
$ |
1.67 |
|
|
Dividends |
|
$ |
.41 |
|
|
$ |
.40 |
|
|
$ |
.82 |
|
|
$ |
.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares |
|
|
98.5 |
|
|
|
98.0 |
|
|
|
98.5 |
|
|
|
98.0 |
|
Common shares, assuming dilution |
|
|
98.9 |
|
|
|
98.7 |
|
|
|
98.9 |
|
|
|
98.8 |
|
|
Common shares outstanding at period end |
|
|
98.5 |
|
|
|
98.2 |
|
|
|
98.5 |
|
|
|
98.2 |
|
|
Certain prior year amounts have been restated to reflect the change in method of accounting for inventory from last-in,
first-out (LIFO) to first-in, first-out (FIFO) for certain businesses operating in the U.S.
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4
Avery Dennison Corporation
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
(In millions) |
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
160.8 |
|
|
$ |
165.3 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
101.6 |
|
|
|
79.7 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
33.6 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
(32.8 |
) |
|
|
13.3 |
|
Asset impairment and net loss on sale and disposal of assets |
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Other non-cash items, net |
|
|
(16.2 |
) |
|
|
(9.9 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities |
|
|
(89.6 |
) |
|
|
(162.0 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
188.7 |
|
|
|
130.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(69.1 |
) |
|
|
(94.7 |
) |
Purchase of software and other deferred charges |
|
|
(33.0 |
) |
|
|
(29.0 |
) |
Payments for acquisitions |
|
|
(125.0 |
) |
|
|
(1,284.1 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Proceeds from sale of investments, net |
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
.7 |
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(209.0 |
) |
|
|
(1,405.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in borrowings (maturities of 90 days or less) |
|
|
(285.1 |
) |
|
|
1,423.9 |
|
Additional borrowings (maturities longer than 90 days) |
|
|
400.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of debt (maturities longer than 90 days) |
|
|
(.3 |
) |
|
|
(11.7 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
(87.6 |
) |
|
|
(85.4 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63.2 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options, net |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
30.5 |
|
Other |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
34.4 |
|
|
|
1,292.0 |
|
|
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash balances |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
.6 |
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
71.5 |
|
|
|
58.5 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
87.1 |
|
|
$ |
76.6 |
|
|
Certain prior year amounts have been restated to reflect the change in method of accounting for inventory
from last-in, first-out (LIFO) to first-in, first-out (FIFO) for certain businesses operating in the
U.S.
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5
Avery Dennison Corporation
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. General
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements include normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of Avery Dennison
Corporations (the Company) interim results. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements and notes in this Form 10-Q are presented as permitted by Article 10 of Regulation S-X.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not contain certain information
included in the Companys 2007 annual financial statements and notes. This Form 10-Q should be
read in conjunction with the Companys consolidated financial statements and notes included in the
Companys 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The second quarters of 2008 and 2007 consisted of thirteen-week periods ending June 28, 2008 and
June 30, 2007, respectively. The interim results of operations are not necessarily indicative of
future financial results.
Financial Presentation
Certain prior year amounts have been restated to conform with the current year presentation as a
result of:
Change in Accounting Method
Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company changed its method of accounting for
inventories for the Companys U.S. operations from a combination of the use of the first-in,
first-out (FIFO) and the last-in, first-out (LIFO) methods to the FIFO method. The inventories
for the Companys international operations continue to be valued using the FIFO method. The
Company believes the change is preferable as the FIFO method better reflects the current value of
inventories on the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet; provides better matching of
revenue and expense in the unaudited Consolidated Statement of Income; provides uniformity across
the Companys operations with respect to the method for inventory accounting; and enhances
comparability with peers. Furthermore, this application of the FIFO method is consistent with the
Companys accounting of inventories for U.S. income tax purposes.
The change in accounting method from LIFO to FIFO method was completed in accordance with Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.
The Company applied the change in accounting principle by retrospectively restating prior years
financial statements. As a result of the change in the Companys policy for accounting for
inventory, pretax income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 was increased by $.6
million and $.5 million, respectively.
Note 2. Acquisitions
On June 15, 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of Paxar Corporation (Paxar), a global
leader in retail tag, ticketing, and branding systems. In accordance with the terms of the
acquisition agreement, each outstanding share of Paxar common stock, par value $0.10, was converted
into the right to receive $30.50 in cash. At June 15, 2007, outstanding options to purchase Paxar
Common Stock, shares of Paxar restricted stock and Paxar performance share awards were converted
into weight-adjusted options to purchase the Companys common stock, shares of the Companys
restricted stock and, at the Companys election, shares of the Companys restricted stock or the
Companys restricted stock units, respectively. Since the date of acquisition, certain of these
equity awards have vested on an accelerated basis.
The Paxar operations are included in the Companys Retail Information Services segment. The
combination of the Paxar business into the Retail Information Services segment increases the
Companys presence in the retail information and brand identification market, combines
complementary strengths and broadens the range of the Companys product and service capabilities,
improves the Companys ability to meet customer demands for product innovation and improved quality
of service, and facilitates expansion into new product and geographic segments. The integration of
the acquisition into the Companys operations has resulted in significant cost synergies.
Purchase Price Allocation
The total purchase price was approximately $1.33 billion for the outstanding shares of Paxar,
including transaction costs of approximately $15 million.
In accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, the allocation of the purchase price has
been made and recorded in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The
allocation of the purchase price was primarily based on third-party valuations of the acquired
assets.
6
Avery Dennison Corporation
The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the
date of the acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
June 15, 2007 |
|
|
Current assets (including cash and cash equivalents of approximately $47 million) |
|
$ |
358.7 |
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net |
|
|
250.8 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1.1 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
241.6 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
945.5 |
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
$ |
1,797.7 |
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
219.6 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
220.3 |
|
Other equity |
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
Total liabilities and other equity |
|
$ |
464.5 |
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
1,333.2 |
|
|
As a result of the Paxar acquisition, the Company assumed liabilities of approximately $440
million, including accounts payable and other current and long-term liabilities. Included in this
amount is approximately $5 million of long-term debt, which remains outstanding at June 28, 2008.
In addition, the Company assumed additional standby letters of credit of $7.3 million.
The excess of the cost basis over the fair value of the net tangible assets acquired is
approximately $1.19 billion, including goodwill of approximately $946 million and identified
intangible assets of approximately $242 million, which includes amortizable and non-amortizable
intangible assets. The goodwill from this acquisition is not expected to be deductible for U.S. tax purposes.
Identifiable intangible assets consist of customer relationships, patents and other acquired
technology and other intangibles. These intangible assets include approximately $183 million for
customer relationships with a weighted-average useful life of ten years; approximately $25 million
for patent and other acquired technology with a weighted-average useful life of eight years; and
approximately $4 million for other intangibles with a weighted-average useful life of ten years.
These acquired amortizable intangible assets have an estimated weighted-average useful life of nine
years. Furthermore, approximately $30 million of the acquired intangible assets related to trade
names and trademarks are not subject to amortization because they have an indefinite useful life.
Refer
also to Note 5, Goodwill and Other Intangibles Resulting from Business Acquisitions.
There were no in-progress research and development assets acquired as a result of the acquisition.
Paxar
Integration Actions
As a result of the Paxar acquisition, the Company identified certain liabilities and other costs of
$25 million for restructuring actions which were recorded as part of the Companys purchase price
allocation. Included in this amount are severance costs for involuntary terminations of
approximately 1,365 Paxar employees of $21.1 million, lease cancellation costs of $3.2 million, and
other related costs of $.7 million. Severance costs are included in Other current liabilities in
the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Severance and other employee costs represent
cash paid or to be paid to employees terminated under these actions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Price |
(In millions) |
|
Adjustments |
|
Total severance and other employee costs accrued during the quarters ended: |
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
September 29, 2007 |
|
|
4.7 |
|
December 29, 2007 |
|
|
11.3 |
|
March 29, 2008 |
|
|
1.2 |
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
Total accrued |
|
|
21.1 |
|
2007 Settlements |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
2008 Settlements |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
Balance at June 28, 2008 |
|
$ |
11.4 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
Lease cancellations |
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
Other |
|
|
.7 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
|
7
Avery Dennison Corporation
Included in the assumed current liabilities were accrued restructuring costs related to Paxars
pre-acquisition restructuring program. At June 28, 2008, approximately $1 million remained accrued
in connection with this program.
Employee-Related Items
In connection with this acquisition, certain change-in-control provisions provided that $27.8
million was to be paid to certain key executives of Paxar. This amount includes severance,
bonuses, accelerated vesting of stock options, performance share awards, restricted stock, and
other items. In connection with these items, $.9 million remained accrued in Other current
liabilities in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 28, 2008. New
employment agreements for certain key executives retained by the Company provided for $8.2 million
to be accrued over their requisite service periods, of which $5 million was recorded during 2007
and $1.4 million was recorded during the first six months of 2008 in the unaudited Consolidated
Statement of Income.
Included in the assumed long-term liabilities was a postretirement benefit plan obligation totaling
approximately $11 million for certain retired executives of Paxar. The Company contributed $.5
million during 2007 and $.5 million during the first six months of 2008 to this plan.
The estimated fair value of equity includes the total amount related to converted Paxar stock
options and performance share awards of approximately $24 million. This total includes amounts
related to converted but unvested stock options and performance share awards (approximately $5
million), which will be recognized in the Companys operating results over the remaining vesting
periods of these equity awards.
Pro Forma Results of Operations
The following table represents the unaudited pro forma results of operations for the Company as
though the acquisition of Paxar had occurred at the beginning of 2007. The pro forma results
include estimated interest expense associated with commercial paper borrowings to fund the
acquisition; amortization of intangible assets that have been acquired; adjustment to income tax
provision using the worldwide combined effective tax rates of both the Company and Paxar;
elimination of intercompany sales and profit in inventory; fair value adjustments to inventory; and
additional depreciation resulting from fair value amounts allocated to real and personal property
over the estimated useful lives. The pro forma results of operations have been prepared based on
the allocation of the purchase price. This pro forma information is for comparison purposes only,
and is not necessarily indicative of the results that would have occurred had the acquisition been
completed at the beginning of 2007, nor is it necessarily indicative of future results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
|
June 30, 2007(1) |
|
|
June 30, 2007(2) |
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,726.8 |
|
|
$ |
3,327.9 |
|
Net income |
|
|
77.8 |
|
|
|
140.2 |
|
Net income per common share |
|
|
.79 |
|
|
|
1.43 |
|
Net income per common share, assuming
dilution |
|
|
.79 |
|
|
|
1.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The pro forma results of operations for the second quarter of 2007 include the
Companys restructuring costs and other charges discussed in Note 17, Segment Information. |
|
(2) |
|
The pro forma results of operations for the first six months of 2007 include the
impact of Paxars restructuring costs and other charges of $1.8 and merger-related costs of
$1.5, as well as the Companys restructuring costs and other charges discussed in Note 17,
Segment Information. |
Prior to the acquisition, the Company sold certain roll materials products to Paxar. The Companys
net sales to Paxar prior to the acquisition were approximately $8 million during the first six
months of 2007.
Other Acquisitions
On April 1, 2008, the Company acquired DM Label Group (DM Label). DM Label operations are
included in the Companys Retail Information Services segment. The impact of this acquisition on
the Companys revenues and earnings for 2008 is not anticipated to be significant.
8
Avery Dennison Corporation
The preliminary balance sheet allocation of the purchase price as of June 28, 2008 has been made
and recorded in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The preliminary
allocation of the purchase price included an estimated $66 million of goodwill. Refer also to Note
5, Goodwill and Other Intangibles Resulting from Business Acquisitions.
Note 3. Accounts Receivable
The Company recorded expenses related to the allowances for trade accounts receivable of $8.2
million and $4.2 million for the six months ended June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007, respectively.
The Company records these allowances based on estimates related to the following factors:
|
|
|
Customer specific allowances |
|
|
|
|
Amounts based upon an aging schedule |
|
|
|
|
An estimated amount, based on the Companys historical experience |
Note 4. Inventories
Inventories consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
|
December 29, 2007 |
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
282.0 |
|
|
$ |
252.6 |
|
Work-in-progress |
|
|
161.2 |
|
|
|
151.5 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
310.8 |
|
|
|
304.2 |
|
|
Inventories at lower of FIFO cost or market (approximates replacement cost) |
|
|
754.0 |
|
|
|
708.3 |
|
Inventory reserves |
|
|
(74.9 |
) |
|
|
(77.3 |
) |
|
Inventories, net |
|
$ |
679.1 |
|
|
$ |
631.0 |
|
|
Note 5. Goodwill and Other Intangibles Resulting from Business Acquisitions
Changes in the net carrying amount of goodwill for the periods shown, by reportable segment, are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure- |
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Office and |
|
|
specialty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
sensitive |
|
|
Information |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
converting |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Materials |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Products |
|
|
businesses |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Balance as of December 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
332.4 |
|
|
$ |
200.5 |
|
|
$ |
169.1 |
|
|
$ |
13.9 |
|
|
$ |
715.9 |
|
Goodwill acquired during the period (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
935.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
935.7 |
|
Acquisition adjustments (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.5 |
) |
Translation adjustments |
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
.1 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Balance as of December 29, 2007 |
|
$ |
354.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,137.7 |
|
|
$ |
177.6 |
|
|
$ |
14.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,683.3 |
|
Goodwill acquired during the period (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
66.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66.3 |
|
Acquisition adjustments (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
Translation adjustments |
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
.1 |
|
|
|
61.6 |
|
|
Balance as of June 28, 2008 |
|
$ |
375.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,250.7 |
|
|
$ |
185.3 |
|
|
$ |
14.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,825.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Goodwill acquired during the period includes Paxar acquisition in June 2007, as well
as buy-outs of minority interest shareholders associated with RVL Packaging, Inc. and Paxar. |
|
(2) |
|
Acquisition adjustments in 2007 consisted of a tax adjustment associated with RVL
Packaging, Inc. |
|
(3) |
|
Goodwill acquired during the period consisted of the DM Label acquisition in April
2008. |
|
(4) |
|
Acquisition adjustments in 2008 consisted of opening balance sheet adjustments
associated with the Paxar acquisition in June 2007. |
As of June 28, 2008, goodwill and other intangible assets and related useful lives include the
allocations of the purchase price of the Companys recent acquisitions, based on third-party
valuations of the acquired assets. Refer to Note 2, Acquisitions, for further information.
In connection with the Paxar acquisition, the Company acquired approximately $30 million of
intangible assets, consisting of certain trade names and trademarks, which are not subject to
amortization because they have an indefinite useful life. These intangible assets, which are not
included in the table below, had a currency impact of $.2 million at June 28, 2008.
9
Avery Dennison Corporation
The following table sets forth the Companys other intangible assets resulting from business
acquisitions at June 28, 2008 and December 29, 2007, which continue to be amortized:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
|
December 29, 2007 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
(In millions) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
Amortizable other intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
291.6 |
|
|
$ |
57.1 |
|
|
$ |
234.5 |
|
|
$ |
276.1 |
|
|
$ |
41.8 |
|
|
$ |
234.3 |
|
Patents and other acquired technology |
|
|
53.6 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
37.1 |
|
|
|
52.4 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
38.3 |
|
Trade names and trademarks |
|
|
48.9 |
|
|
|
41.6 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
46.2 |
|
|
|
38.6 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
Other intangibles |
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
403.2 |
|
|
$ |
120.3 |
|
|
$ |
282.9 |
|
|
$ |
383.3 |
|
|
$ |
99.1 |
|
|
$ |
284.2 |
|
|
Amortization expense on other intangible assets resulting from business acquisitions was $7.9
million and $15.8 million for the three and six months ended June 28, 2008, respectively, and $3
million and $5.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively. The
estimated amortization expense for other intangible assets resulting from completed business
acquisitions as of June 28, 2008 for this fiscal year and each of the next four fiscal years is
expected to be approximately $30 million per year.
The weighted-average amortization periods from the date of acquisition for amortizable intangible
assets resulting from business acquisitions are fourteen years for customer relationships, eleven
years for trade names and trademarks, thirteen years for patents and other acquired technology,
eight years for other intangibles and fourteen years in total. As of June 28, 2008, the
weighted-average remaining useful life of acquired amortizable intangible assets are eleven years
for customer relationships, five years for trade names and trademarks, eight years for patented and
other acquired technology, five years for other intangibles and ten years in total.
Note 6. Debt
In February 2008, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company entered into a credit agreement for a
term loan credit facility with fifteen domestic and foreign banks for a total commitment of $400
million, maturing February 8, 2011. The subsidiarys payment and performance under the agreement
are guaranteed by the Company. Financing available under the agreement is permitted to be used for
working capital and other general corporate purposes, including acquisitions. The term loan credit
facility typically bears interest at an annual rate of, at the subsidiarys option, either (i)
between LIBOR plus 0.300% and LIBOR plus 0.850%, depending on the Companys debt ratings by either
Standard & Poors Rating Service (S&P) or Moodys Investors Service (Moodys), or (ii) the
higher of (A) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% or (B) the prime rate. The Company used the term
loan credit facility to reduce commercial paper borrowings previously issued to fund the
acquisition of Paxar. The term loan credit facility is subject to customary financial covenants,
including a maximum leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio.
In February 2008, the Company terminated its bridge revolving credit agreement, dated June 13,
2007, with five domestic and foreign banks.
The terms of various loan agreements in effect at June 28, 2008 require that the Company maintain
specified ratios on debt and interest expense in relation to certain measures of income. Under the
loan agreements, the ratio of debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization,
and non-cash expenses may not exceed 3.5 to 1.0. The Companys ratio at June 28, 2008 was 3.1 to
1.0. Earnings before interest, taxes, and non-cash expenses, as a ratio to interest, may not be
less than 3.5 to 1.0. The Companys ratio at June 28, 2008 was 3.9 to 1.0.
Note 7. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
The following table sets forth the components of net periodic benefit cost for the periods shown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
June 30, 2007 |
(In millions) |
|
U.S. |
|
|
Intl |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Intl |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Intl |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Intl |
|
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
5.1 |
|
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
9.8 |
|
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
|
$ |
9.3 |
|
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(12.7 |
) |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
(12.3 |
) |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
(25.5 |
) |
|
|
(14.9 |
) |
|
|
(24.5 |
) |
|
|
(11.9 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
.9 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
.3 |
|
|
|
.2 |
|
|
|
.5 |
|
|
|
.1 |
|
|
|
.6 |
|
|
|
.3 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
.3 |
|
Amortization of transition asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.5 |
) |
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
$ |
4.3 |
|
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
$ |
5.1 |
|
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
|
$ |
8.4 |
|
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
|
$ |
10.2 |
|
|
10
Avery Dennison Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Postretirement Health Benefits |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
(In millions) |
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
.2 |
|
|
$ |
.2 |
|
|
$ |
.5 |
|
|
$ |
.5 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
.5 |
|
|
|
.5 |
|
|
|
.9 |
|
|
|
.9 |
|
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
.4 |
|
|
|
.3 |
|
|
|
.8 |
|
|
|
.7 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(.5 |
) |
|
|
(.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(.9 |
) |
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
.6 |
|
|
$ |
.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
The Company contributed $1.8 million and $1.2 million to its U.S. pension plans during the six
months ended June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007, respectively. The Company expects to contribute an
additional $1.9 million to its U.S. pension plans for the remainder of 2008. Additionally, the
Company contributed $1.7 million and $3 million to its U.S. postretirement health benefit plan
during the six months ended June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007, respectively. For the remainder of
2008, the Company expects to contribute an additional $1.5 million to its U.S. postretirement
health benefit plan.
The Company contributed $9 million and $9.8 million to its international pension plans during the
six months ended June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007, respectively. For the remainder of 2008, the
Company expects to contribute an additional $7.6 million to its international pension plans.
Note 8. Research and Development
Research and development expense for the three and six months ended June 28, 2008 was $23.9 million
and $48.4 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, research and
development expense was $23.6 million and $45.8 million, respectively.
Note 9. Stock-Based Compensation
Net income included pretax stock-based compensation expense related to stock options, performance
units (PUs), restricted stock units (RSUs) and restricted stock of $16.9 million and $10.3
million for the six months ended June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007, respectively. Total stock-based
compensation expense was recorded in corporate expense and the Companys operating segments, as
appropriate.
During the second quarter 2008, following the Companys shareholders approval of the amended and
restated stock option and incentive plan on April 24, 2008, the Company granted PUs to certain
eligible employees of the Company. These PUs are payable in shares of the Companys common stock
at the end of a three-year cliff vesting period provided that certain performance objective metrics
are achieved at the end of the period ending December 31, 2010. During the first six months of
2008, the Company recognized $1.8 million of pretax compensation expense related to PUs, which is
included in the stock-based compensation expense noted above.
On February 28, 2008, the Company granted its annual stock option awards to employees and
directors. The provision of SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, requires that options granted
to retirement-eligible employees be treated as though they were immediately vested; as a result,
the pretax compensation expense related to such options (approximately $3 million) was recognized
during the six months ended June 28, 2008 and is included in the stock-based compensation expense
noted above.
As of June 28, 2008, the Company has approximately $63 million of unrecognized compensation cost
related to unvested stock options, PUs, RSUs and restricted stock under the Companys plans. Total
unrecognized compensation cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average
requisite service period of approximately 3 years for stock options and PUs, 2 years for RSUs and 3
years for restricted stock.
Note 10. Cost Reduction Actions
Severance charges recorded under the restructuring actions below are included in Other current
liabilities in the unaudited Condensed
11
Avery Dennison Corporation
Consolidated Balance Sheet. Severance and other employee
costs represent cash paid or to be paid to employees terminated under these
actions. Charges below are included in Other expense, net in the unaudited Consolidated
Statement of Income.
Second Quarter 2008
In the second quarter of 2008, the Company recorded a pretax charge of $10.3 million consisting of
$7.2 million of severance and other employee costs resulting in the elimination of approximately
310 positions impacting all segments, as well as $1.7 million of asset impairment charges and $1.4
million of lease cancellation charges. As of June 28, 2008, approximately 115 employees impacted
by these actions remain with the Company, and are expected to leave in 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure- |
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Office and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sensitive |
|
|
Information |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Materials |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total severance and other employee costs
accrued during the quarter ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
$ |
.1 |
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
.2 |
|
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
|
2008 Settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.7 |
) |
|
|
(.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.9 |
) |
|
Balance at June 28, 2008 |
|
$ |
.1 |
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
$ |
4.0 |
|
|
$ |
.2 |
|
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
$ |
.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.1 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease cancellations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
.3 |
|
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
First Quarter 2008
In the first quarter of 2008, the Company recorded a pretax charge of $5.6 million consisting of
$3.3 million of severance and other employee costs resulting in the elimination of approximately
155 positions impacting all segments, as well as $2.3 million of asset impairment charges. As of
June 28, 2008, approximately 60 employees impacted by these actions remain with the Company, and
are expected to leave in 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure- |
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Office and |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sensitive |
|
|
Information |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
specialty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Materials |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Products |
|
|
converting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
businesses |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total severance and other employee costs
accrued during the quarter ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 29, 2008 |
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
.1 |
|
|
$ |
.1 |
|
|
$ |
.7 |
|
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
|
2008 Settlements |
|
|
(.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(.1 |
) |
|
|
(.1 |
) |
|
|
(.7 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
Balance at June 28, 2008 |
|
$ |
.9 |
|
|
$ |
.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
2007
In 2007, the Company continued its cost reduction efforts that were initiated in late 2006 and
implemented additional actions resulting in a headcount reduction of approximately 615 positions,
impairment of certain assets and software, as well as lease cancellations. At June 28, 2008,
approximately 100 employees impacted by these actions remain with the Company, and are expected to
leave in 2008. Pretax charges related to these actions totaled $57.5 million, including severance
and other employee costs of $21.6 million, impairment of fixed assets and buildings of $17.4
million, software impairment of $17.1 million and lease cancellation charges of $1.4 million. The
table below details the accruals and payments related to these actions:
12
Avery Dennison Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure- |
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Office and |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sensitive |
|
|
Information |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
specialty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Materials |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Products |
|
|
converting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
businesses |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total severance and other
employee costs
accrued during the quarters ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
.5 |
|
|
|
.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.9 |
|
September 29, 2007 |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
.1 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
December 29, 2007 |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(.6 |
) |
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
Total expense accrued during 2007 |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
(.6 |
) |
|
|
21.6 |
|
2007 Settlements |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
(.8 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
.6 |
|
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
2008 Settlements |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
Balance at June 28, 2008 |
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
$ |
10.9 |
|
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
.8 |
|
|
$ |
16.7 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.7 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software Impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
Lease cancellations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.6 |
|
|
|
.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.4 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
10.9 |
|
|
$ |
21.5 |
|
|
$ |
.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
35.9 |
|
|
Note 11. Financial Instruments and Foreign Currency
The Company enters into certain foreign exchange hedge contracts to reduce its risk from exchange
rate fluctuations associated with receivables, payables, loans and firm commitments denominated in
certain foreign currencies that arise primarily as a result of its operations outside the U.S. The
Company enters into certain interest rate contracts to help manage its exposure to interest rate
fluctuations. The Company also enters into certain natural gas futures contracts to hedge price
fluctuations for a portion of its anticipated domestic purchases. The maximum length of time in
which the Company hedges its exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted
transactions is generally 12 to 24 months.
The aggregate reclassification from other comprehensive income to earnings for settlement or
ineffectiveness of hedge activity was a net gain of $2 million and $.6 million during the three and
six months ended June 28, 2008, respectively. This reclassification was a net loss of $2.4 million
and $5.3 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively. These
aggregate reclassifications were reported in Marketing, general and administrative expense in the
unaudited Consolidated Statement of Income. The effect of the settlement of currency hedges
included in this reclassification is offset by the currency impact of the underlying hedged
activity. A net loss of approximately $2 million is expected to be reclassified from other
comprehensive income to earnings within the next 12 months.
Included in the reclassification amount discussed above is the amortization of certain hedge costs
of approximately $7 million incurred in connection with the long-term debt issued in 2007 related
to the Paxar acquisition. Such costs are being amortized over the life of the related forecasted
hedge transactions.
Transactions in foreign currencies (including receivables, payables and loans denominated in
currencies other than the functional currency) increased net income by $3.7 million and $11.6
million for the three and six months ended June 28, 2008, respectively, which included a foreign
currency net gain related to certain intercompany transactions of approximately $2 million and
approximately $6 million during the three and six months ended June 28, 2008, respectively.
Transactions in foreign currencies had a positive impact of $1.1 million and $1.2 million on the
Companys net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively. These results
exclude the effects of translation of foreign currencies on the Companys financial statements.
In the first six months of 2008 and 2007, no translation gains or losses for hyperinflationary
economies were recognized in net income since the Company had no operations in hyperinflationary
economies.
13
Avery Dennison Corporation
Note 12. Taxes Based on Income
The effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 28, 2008 was 19% and 8%,
respectively, compared to 23% and 22% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007,
respectively. The effective tax rate for the first six months of 2008 includes the net benefit of
approximately $28 million from discrete events, including $32 million from the release of valuation
allowances, partially offset by $4 million of accruals related to tax contingencies and other
items. The Companys effective tax rate is lower than the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% due
to the Companys operations outside the U.S. where the statutory tax rates are generally lower.
Additional taxes are not provided for most foreign earnings because the Company currently plans to
indefinitely reinvest these amounts.
In June 2008, the Company identified and committed to a plan that will utilize tax loss
carryforwards, resulting in a valuation allowance release of approximately $11 million. This is
distinct from the plan in the first quarter of 2008, discussed below.
In March 2008, the Company identified and committed to a plan that resulted in a partial valuation
allowance release of approximately $21 million. One aspect of the plan will result in taxable
income from financing for a finite period of approximately three years in a jurisdiction that
historically has had tax losses. Notwithstanding an unlimited carryforward period in this
jurisdiction, deferred tax assets for the prior year losses were subject to a full valuation
allowance as of December 29, 2007, due to the lack of sufficient evidence of future profitability
in the jurisdiction. A partial release of this valuation allowance totaling $21 million was
recognized during the first quarter of 2008 based on the amount that is expected to be utilized in
future years under the plan. The Company does not expect to utilize the remaining tax losses in
that jurisdiction and has continued to maintain a valuation allowance for the remaining tax losses.
The amount of income taxes the Company pays is subject to ongoing audits by taxing jurisdictions
around the world. The Companys estimate of the potential outcome of any uncertain tax issue is
subject to managements assessment of relevant risks, facts, and circumstances existing at that
time. The Company believes that it has adequately provided for reasonably foreseeable outcomes
related to these matters. However, the Companys future results may include favorable or
unfavorable adjustments to its estimated tax liabilities in the period the assessments are made or
resolved, which may impact the Companys effective tax rate. With some exceptions, the Company and
its subsidiaries are no longer subject to income tax examinations by tax authorities for years
prior to 2003.
It is reasonably possible that during the next 12 months, the Company may realize a decrease in its
gross uncertain tax positions by approximately $35 million, primarily as a result of the expiration
of statutes of limitations in various jurisdictions, tax audits, and cash payments. The Company
anticipates that it is reasonably possible that payments of approximately $10 million will be made
in the next 12 months.
Note 13. Net Income Per Share
Net income per common share amounts were computed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
(A) Net income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
92.4 |
|
|
$ |
86.2 |
|
|
$ |
160.8 |
|
|
$ |
165.3 |
|
|
(B) Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
98.5 |
|
|
|
98.0 |
|
|
|
98.5 |
|
|
|
98.0 |
|
Dilutive shares (additional common shares issuable under
employee stock options, PUs, RSUs and restricted stock) |
|
|
.4 |
|
|
|
.7 |
|
|
|
.4 |
|
|
|
.8 |
|
|
(C) Weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding, assuming dilution |
|
|
98.9 |
|
|
|
98.7 |
|
|
|
98.9 |
|
|
|
98.8 |
|
|
Net income per common share (A) ÷ (B) |
|
$ |
.94 |
|
|
$ |
.88 |
|
|
$ |
1.63 |
|
|
$ |
1.69 |
|
|
Net income per common share, assuming dilution (A) ÷ (C) |
|
$ |
.93 |
|
|
$ |
.87 |
|
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
|
$ |
1.67 |
|
|
Certain employee stock options and RSUs were not included in the computation of net income per
common share, assuming dilution, because they would not have had a dilutive effect. Employee stock
options and RSUs excluded from the computation represented an aggregate of 10.5 million shares and
9.9 million shares for the three and six months ended June 28, 2008, and 3 million shares and 2.9
million shares for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively.
Note 14. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income includes net income, foreign currency translation adjustments, net actuarial
loss, prior service cost and net transition assets, net of tax, and the gains or losses on the
effective portion of cash flow and firm commitment hedges, net of tax, that are
14
Avery Dennison Corporation
currently presented
as a component of shareholders equity. The Companys total comprehensive income was $118.8
million and $271.3 million for the three and six months ended June 28, 2008, and $102.4 million and
$202.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively.
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (net of tax, with the exception of the
foreign currency translation adjustment), at the end of the following periods were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
|
December 29, 2007 |
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
$ |
344.5 |
|
|
$ |
243.1 |
|
Net actuarial loss, prior service cost and net transition assets, less amortization |
|
|
(138.0 |
) |
|
|
(141.5 |
) |
Net loss on derivative instruments designated as cash flow and firm commitment
hedges |
|
|
(11.2 |
) |
|
|
(16.8 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
$ |
195.3 |
|
|
$ |
84.8 |
|
|
Cash flow and firm commitment hedging instrument activity in other comprehensive income, net of
tax, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
|
Beginning accumulated derivative loss |
|
$ |
(16.8 |
) |
Net gain reclassified to earnings |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Net change in the revaluation of hedging transactions |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
Ending accumulated derivative net loss |
|
$ |
(11.2 |
) |
|
Note 15. Fair Value Measurement
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements, which is effective for fiscal years and interim periods after November 15,
2007. This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and
expands the related disclosure requirements. This statement applies to all financial assets and
liabilities and to all non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at
fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. The statement indicates, among other
things, that a fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell an asset or transfer a
liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a
principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. SFAS No. 157 defines
fair value based upon an exit price model.
In connection with the issuance of SFAS No. 157, the FASB issued FASB Staff Positions (FSP) Nos.
157-1 and 157-2. FSP No. 157-1 amends SFAS No. 157 to exclude SFAS No. 13, Accounting for
Leases, and its related interpretive accounting pronouncements that address leasing transactions.
FSP No. 157-2 delays the effective date of the application of SFAS No. 157 to fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2008 for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities that
are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a nonrecurring basis.
The Company adopted SFAS No. 157 as of the beginning of 2008 fiscal year, with the exception of the
application of the statement to non-recurring non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities.
Non-recurring non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities for which the Company has not
applied the provisions of SFAS No. 157 include those measured at fair value in goodwill impairment
testing, indefinitely-lived intangible assets measured at fair value for impairment testing, and
those initially measured at fair value in business combinations.
SFAS No. 157 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in
measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted
prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets
that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in
which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions
to determine the best estimate of fair value.
15
Avery Dennison Corporation
The following table provides the assets and liabilities carried at fair value measured on a
recurring basis as of June 28, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Total as of |
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
(In millions) |
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
Inputs (Level 2) |
|
|
Inputs (Level 3) |
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale securities |
|
$ |
10.8 |
|
|
$ |
10.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
4.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Available for sale securities are measured at fair value using quoted prices and classified within
Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Derivatives that are exchange-traded are measured at fair value
using quoted market prices and are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.
Derivatives measured based on inputs that are readily available in public markets are classified
within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.
The Company has deferred compensation obligations, which are not subject to fair value
measurements. These obligations are funded by corporate-owned life insurance contracts and standby
letters of credit.
The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a significant impact on the Companys financial results
of operations or financial position.
Note 16. Commitments and Contingencies
Industry Investigations
In April 2003, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a complaint challenging the then
proposed merger of UPM-Kymmene (UPM) and the Morgan Adhesives (MACtac) division of Bemis Co.,
Inc. (Bemis). The complaint alleged, among other things, that UPM and [Avery Dennison] have
already attempted to limit competition between themselves, as reflected in written and oral
communications to each other through high level executives regarding explicit anticompetitive
understandings, although the extent to which these efforts have succeeded is not entirely clear to
the United States at the present time. The DOJ concurrently announced a criminal investigation
into competitive practices in the label stock industry. Other investigations into competitive
practices in the label stock industry were subsequently initiated by the European Commission, the
Competition Law Division of the Department of Justice of Canada, and the Australian Competition and
Consumer Commission. The Company cooperated with all of these investigations, and all, except the
Australian investigation, which is continuing, have subsequently been terminated without further
action by the authorities.
On April 24, 2003, Sentry Business Products, Inc. filed a purported class action on behalf of
direct purchasers of label stock in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois against the Company, UPM, Bemis and certain of their subsidiaries seeking treble damages
and other relief for alleged unlawful competitive practices, essentially repeating the underlying
allegations of the DOJ merger complaint. Ten similar complaints were filed in various federal
district courts. In November 2003, the cases were transferred to the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Pennsylvania and consolidated for pretrial purposes. Plaintiffs filed a
consolidated complaint on February 16, 2004, which the Company answered on March 31, 2004. On
April 14, 2004, the court separated the proceedings as to class certification and merits discovery,
and limited the initial phase of discovery to the issue of the appropriateness of class
certification. On January 4, 2006, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. On January 20, 2006,
the Company filed an answer to the amended complaint. On August 14, 2006, the plaintiffs moved to
certify a proposed class. The Company and other defendants opposed this motion. On March 1, 2007,
the court heard oral argument on the issue of the appropriateness of class certification. On
August 28, 2007, plaintiffs moved to lift the discovery stay, which the Company opposed. On
November 19, 2007, the court certified a class consisting of direct purchasers of self-adhesive
label stock from the defendants during the period from January 1, 1996 to July 25, 2003. The
Company filed a petition to appeal this decision on December 4, 2007, which was denied on March 6,
2008. On July 22, 2008, the district court held a hearing to set a schedule for merits discovery.
The court subsequently entered an order that requires the parties to complete fact discovery by
June 22, 2009. Dispositive motions are due on March 19, 2010. The Company intends to defend these
matters vigorously.
On May 21, 2003, The Harman Press filed in the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles,
California, a purported class action on behalf of indirect purchasers of label stock against the
Company, UPM and UPMs subsidiary Raflatac (Raflatac), seeking treble damages and other relief
for alleged unlawful competitive practices, essentially repeating the underlying allegations of the
DOJ merger complaint. Three similar complaints were filed in various California courts. In
November 2003, on petition from the parties, the California Judicial Council ordered the cases be
coordinated for pretrial purposes. The cases were assigned to a coordination trial judge in the
Superior Court for the City and County of San Francisco on March 30, 2004. On September 30, 2004,
the Harman Press amended its complaint to add Bemis subsidiary Morgan Adhesives Company (MACtac)
as a defendant. On January 21, 2005, American International Distribution Corporation filed a
purported class action on behalf of indirect purchasers in the Superior Court for Chittenden
County, Vermont. Similar actions were filed by Richard Wrobel, on February 16, 2005, in the
District Court of Johnson
County, Kansas; and by Chad and Terry Muzzey, on February 16, 2005 in the District Court of Scotts
Bluff County, Nebraska. On February 17, 2005, Judy Benson filed a purported multi-state class
action on behalf of indirect purchasers in the Circuit Court for Cocke
16
Avery Dennison Corporation
County, Tennessee. The
Nebraska, Kansas and Vermont cases are currently stayed. Defendants motion to dismiss the
Tennessee case, filed on March 30, 2006, is pending. The Company intends to defend these matters
vigorously.
The Board of Directors created an ad hoc committee comprised of independent directors to oversee
the foregoing matters.
The Company is unable to predict the effect of these matters at this time, although the effect
could be adverse and material.
Environmental
The Company has been designated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and/or other
responsible state agencies as a potentially responsible party (PRP) at sixteen waste disposal or
waste recycling sites, including Paxar sites, which are the subject of separate investigations or
proceedings concerning alleged soil and/or groundwater contamination and for which no settlement of
the Companys liability has been agreed. The Company is participating with other PRPs at such
sites, and anticipates that its share of cleanup costs will be determined pursuant to remedial
agreements entered into in the normal course of negotiations with the EPA or other governmental
authorities.
The Company has accrued liabilities for these and certain other sites, including sites in which
governmental agencies have designated the Company as a PRP, where it is probable that a loss will
be incurred and the cost or amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. However, because of the
uncertainties associated with environmental assessment and remediation activities, future expense
to remediate the currently identified sites and any sites which could be identified in the future
for cleanup could be higher than the liability currently accrued.
As of June 28, 2008, the Companys estimated liability associated with compliance and remediation
costs was approximately $62 million, including estimated liabilities related to the Companys
recent acquisitions.
Other amounts currently accrued are not significant to the consolidated financial position of the
Company and, based upon current information, management believes it is unlikely that the resolution
of these matters will significantly impact the Companys consolidated financial position, results
of operations or cash flows.
Product Warranty
The Company provides for an estimate of costs that may be incurred under its basic limited warranty
at the time product revenue is recognized. These costs primarily include materials and labor
associated with the service or sale of the product. Factors that affect the Companys warranty
liability include the number of units installed or sold, historical and anticipated rate of
warranty claims on those units, cost per claim to satisfy the Companys warranty obligation and
availability of insurance coverage. As these factors are impacted by actual experience and future
expectations, the Company assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liability and adjusts the
amounts as necessary.
Product warranty liabilities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
|
December 29, 2007 |
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
Accruals for warranties issued |
|
|
.1 |
|
|
|
.8 |
|
Assumed accrued warranty liability (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.5 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(.2 |
) |
|
|
(.7 |
) |
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Related to the Paxar acquisition |
Other
In 2005, the Company contacted relevant authorities in the U.S. and reported on the results of an
internal investigation of potential violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The
transactions at issue were carried out by a small number of employees of the Companys reflective
business in China, and involved, among other things, impermissible payments or attempted
impermissible payments. The payments or attempted payments and the contracts associated with them
appear to have been relatively minor in amount and of limited duration. Corrective and
disciplinary actions have been taken. Sales of the Companys reflective business in China in 2005
were approximately $7 million. Based on findings to date, no changes to the Companys previously
filed financial statements are warranted as a result of these matters. However, the Company
expects that fines or other penalties could be incurred. While the Company is unable to predict
the financial or operating impact of any such fines or penalties, it believes that its behavior in
detecting,
investigating, responding to and voluntarily disclosing these matters to authorities should be
viewed favorably.
17
Avery Dennison Corporation
The Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various other lawsuits, claims and inquiries, most
of which are routine to the nature of the Companys business. Based upon current information,
management believes that the resolution of these other matters will not materially affect the
Companys financial position.
The Company participates in international receivable financing programs with several financial
institutions whereby advances may be requested from these financial institutions. Such advances
are guaranteed by the Company. At June 28, 2008, the Company had guaranteed approximately $16
million.
As of June 28, 2008, the Company guaranteed up to approximately $22 million of certain foreign
subsidiaries obligations to their suppliers, as well as approximately $543 million of certain
subsidiaries lines of credit with various financial institutions.
In November 2007, the Company issued $400 million of 7.875% Corporate HiMEDS units, a mandatory
convertible debt issue. An additional $40 million of HiMEDS units were issued in December 2007 as
a result of the exercise of the overallotment allocation from the initial issuance. Each HiMEDS
unit is comprised of two components a purchase contract obligating the holder to purchase from the Company
a certain number of shares of the Companys common stock in 2010 ranging from approximately 6.8 million to
approximately 8.6 million shares (depending on the quoted price per share of the Companys common stock at
that time) and a senior note due in 2020. The net proceeds from the offering were approximately
$427 million, which were used to reduce commercial paper borrowings initially used to finance the
Paxar acquisition.
Note 17. Segment Information
As discussed in Note 2, Acquisitions, the Company completed the acquisition of Paxar during the
second quarter of 2007 and the acquisition of DM Label during the second quarter of 2008. The
operating results for the Companys recent acquisitions are included in the Retail Information
Services segment.
Financial information by reportable segment and other businesses is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
(In millions) |
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
Net sales to unaffiliated customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure-sensitive Materials |
|
$ |
979.9 |
|
|
$ |
879.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,899.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,739.3 |
|
Retail Information Services |
|
|
438.2 |
|
|
|
219.4 |
|
|
|
810.2 |
|
|
|
375.9 |
|
Office and Consumer Products |
|
|
255.4 |
|
|
|
262.7 |
|
|
|
449.8 |
|
|
|
477.1 |
|
Other specialty converting businesses |
|
|
155.4 |
|
|
|
162.1 |
|
|
|
314.6 |
|
|
|
321.1 |
|
|
Net sales to unaffiliated customers |
|
$ |
1,828.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,523.5 |
|
|
$ |
3,474.1 |
|
|
$ |
2,913.4 |
|
|
Intersegment sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure-sensitive Materials |
|
$ |
45.8 |
|
|
$ |
41.5 |
|
|
$ |
86.6 |
|
|
$ |
76.5 |
|
Retail Information Services |
|
|
.1 |
|
|
|
.3 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
.8 |
|
Office and Consumer Products |
|
|
.3 |
|
|
|
.4 |
|
|
|
.6 |
|
|
|
.9 |
|
Other specialty converting businesses |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
(54.2 |
) |
|
|
(47.4 |
) |
|
|
(103.3 |
) |
|
|
(87.3 |
) |
|
Intersegment sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Income before taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure-sensitive Materials |
|
$ |
80.0 |
|
|
$ |
89.5 |
|
|
$ |
149.9 |
|
|
$ |
171.4 |
|
Retail Information Services |
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
Office and Consumer Products |
|
|
40.1 |
|
|
|
42.2 |
|
|
|
61.6 |
|
|
|
68.7 |
|
Other specialty converting businesses |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
Corporate expense |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
|
|
(20.6 |
) |
Interest expense (5) |
|
|
(29.3 |
) |
|
|
(20.1 |
) |
|
|
(58.8 |
) |
|
|
(35.2 |
) |
|
Income before taxes |
|
$ |
114.2 |
(1) |
|
$ |
112.0 |
(2) |
|
$ |
175.1 |
(3) |
|
$ |
210.8 |
(4) |
|
18
Avery Dennison Corporation
Certain prior year amounts have been restated to reflect the change in method of accounting for
inventory from last-in, first-out (LIFO) to first-in, first-out (FIFO) for certain businesses
operating in the U.S.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Operating income for the second quarter of 2008 included Other expense, net
totaling $5.8 consisting of restructuring costs of $7.2 and asset impairment and lease
cancellation charges of $3.1, partially offset by a gain on sale of investments of ($4.5). Of
the total $5.8, the Pressure-sensitive Materials segment recorded $.4, the Retail Information
Services segment recorded $5.5, the Office and Consumer Products segment recorded $4.2 and
Corporate recorded ($4.3). |
|
|
|
Additionally, operating income for the Retail Information Services segment for the second quarter
of 2008 included $5.7 of transition costs associated with the Companys recent acquisitions. |
|
(2) |
|
Operating income for the second quarter of 2007 included Other expense, net
totaling $7.5 consisting of integration-related asset impairment charges of $9.5,
restructuring costs of $.9 and expenses related to a divestiture of $.3, partially offset by a
reversal of an accrual ($3.2) related to a lawsuit. Of the total $7.5, the Pressure-sensitive
Materials segment recorded ($2.7), the Retail Information Services segment recorded $9.9 and
the Office and Consumer Products segment recorded $.3. |
|
|
|
Additionally, operating income for the Retail Information Services segment for the second quarter
of 2007 included $10.2 of transition costs associated with the Paxar acquisition.
|
|
(3) |
|
Operating income for the first six months of 2008 included Other expense, net
totaling $11.4 consisting of restructuring costs of $10.5 and asset impairment and lease
cancellation charges of $5.4, partially offset by a gain on sale of investments of ($4.5). Of
the total $11.4, the Pressure-sensitive Materials segment recorded $3.8, the Retail
Information Services segment recorded $6.8, the Office and Consumer Products segment recorded
$4.3, the other specialty converting businesses recorded $.1 and Corporate recorded ($3.6). |
|
|
|
Additionally, operating income for the Retail Information Services segment for the first six
months of 2008 included $12.7 of transition costs associated with the Companys recent
acquisitions. |
|
(4) |
|
Operating income for the first six months of 2007 included Other expense, net
totaling $9.6 consisting of integration-related asset impairment charges of $9.5,
restructuring costs of $3 and expenses related to a divestiture of $.3, partially offset by a
reversal of an accrual ($3.2) related to a lawsuit. Of the total $9.6, the Pressure-sensitive
Materials segment recorded ($1.2), the Retail Information Services segment recorded $9.9 and
the Office and Consumer Products segment recorded $.9. |
|
|
|
Additionally, operating income for the Retail Information Services segment for the first six months
of 2007 included $10.2 of transition costs associated with the Paxar acquisition. |
|
(5) |
|
Interest expense for the three and six months ended June 28, 2008 included interest
associated with borrowings to fund the Companys recent acquisitions of $16.3 and $32.8,
respectively. |
Note 18. Recent Accounting Requirements
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles. SFAS No. 162 identifies a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting
accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements that are presented in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for nongovernmental entities (the Hierarchy).
The Hierarchy within SFAS No. 162 is consistent with that previously defined in the AICPA Statement
on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 69, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles. SFAS No. 162 is effective 60 days following the United States
Securities and Exchange Commissions approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles. The adoption of SFAS No. 162 will not have a material effect on the
Consolidated Financial Statements because the Company has utilized the guidance within SAS No. 69.
In April 2008, the FASB directed the FASB Staff to issue FSP No. 142-3, Determination of the
Useful Life of Intangible Assets. FSP No. 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in
developing renewal or extension assumptions used for purposes of determining the useful life of a
recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142. FSP FAS No. 142-3 is intended to improve the
consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142 and the
period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS No. 141(R) and
other U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. FSP No. 142-3 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008. Earlier application is not permitted. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of this Statement on the Companys financial results of operations and
financial position.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, an amendment of
FASB Statement No. 133. This Statement is intended to improve transparency in financial reporting
by requiring enhanced disclosures of an entitys derivative instruments and hedging activities and
their effects on the entitys financial position, financial performance, and
19
Avery Dennison Corporation
cash flows. SFAS No.
161 applies to all derivative instruments within the scope of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as well as related hedged items, bifurcated
derivatives, and non-derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments.
Entities with instruments subject to SFAS No. 161 must provide more robust qualitative disclosures
and expanded quantitative disclosures. SFAS No. 161 is effective prospectively for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with
early application permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the disclosure implications of
this Statement.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statementsan amendment of Accounting Review Board (ARB) No. 51. This Statement is
effective for fiscal years and interim periods, beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with
earlier adoption prohibited. This Statement requires the recognition of a non-controlling interest
(minority interest) as equity in the consolidated financial statements and separate from the
parents equity. The amount of net income attributable to the non-controlling interest will be
included in consolidated net income on the income statement. It also amends certain of ARB
No. 51s consolidation procedures for consistency with the requirements of SFAS No. 141(R). This
Statement also includes expanded disclosure requirements regarding the interests of the parent and
its non-controlling interest. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this Statement on
the Companys financial results of operations and financial position.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations. This Statement
replaces SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, and defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains
control of one or more businesses in the business combination and establishes the acquisition date
as the date that the acquirer achieves control. This Statements scope is broader than that of
SFAS No. 141, which applied only to business combinations in which control was obtained by
transferring consideration. In general, SFAS No. 141(R) requires the acquiring entity in a
business combination to recognize the fair value of all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed
in the transaction; establishes the acquisition-date as the fair value measurement point; and
modifies the disclosure requirements. This Statement applies prospectively to business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the first annual reporting period
beginning on or after December 15, 2008. However, starting fiscal 2009, accounting for changes in
valuation allowances for acquired deferred tax assets and the resolution of uncertain tax positions
for prior business combinations will impact tax expense instead of goodwill. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of this Statement on the Companys financial results of operations
and financial position.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FAS 115. This Statement details the disclosures
required for items measured at fair value. This Statement is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not
affect the Companys financial results of operations or financial position as the Company did not
elect the fair value option for its eligible financial assets or liabilities.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This Statement
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles, and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. This Statement is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
Relative to SFAS No. 157, the FASB issued FSP Nos. 157-1 and 157-2. FSP No. 157-1 amends SFAS No.
157 to exclude SFAS No. 13 and its related interpretive accounting pronouncements that address
leasing transactions. FSP No. 157-2 delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all
non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed
at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. The Company adopted SFAS No. 157,
as amended, with the exception of the application of the Statement to non-recurring non-financial
assets and non-financial liabilities. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a significant
impact on the Companys financial results of operations or financial position. See Note 15, Fair
Value Measurements, for further discussion.
20
Avery Dennison Corporation
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ORGANIZATION OF INFORMATION
Managements Discussion and Analysis provides a narrative concerning our financial performance and
condition that should be read in conjunction with the accompanying financial statements. It
includes the following sections:
|
|
|
|
|
Definition of Terms |
|
|
21 |
|
Overview and Outlook |
|
|
21 |
|
Analysis of Results of Operations for the Second Quarter |
|
|
25 |
|
Results of Operations by Segment for the Second Quarter |
|
|
27 |
|
Analysis of Results of Operations for the Six Months Year-to-Date |
|
|
28 |
|
Results of Operations by Segment for the Six Months Year-to-Date |
|
|
30 |
|
Financial Condition |
|
|
32 |
|
Uses and Limitations of Non-GAAP Measures |
|
|
37 |
|
Recent Accounting Requirements |
|
|
37 |
|
Safe Harbor Statement |
|
|
37 |
|
DEFINITION OF TERMS
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States of America, or GAAP. Our discussion of financial results includes
several non-GAAP measures to provide additional information concerning Avery Dennison Corporations
(the Companys) performance. These non-GAAP financial measures are not in accordance with, nor
are they a substitute for, GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures are intended
to supplement our presentation of our financial results that are prepared in accordance with GAAP.
Refer to Uses and Limitations of Non-GAAP Measures.
We use the following terms:
|
|
Organic sales growth (decline) refers to the change in sales excluding the estimated impact
of currency translation, acquisitions and divestitures; |
|
|
|
Segment operating income refers to income before interest and taxes; |
|
|
|
Free cash flow refers to cash flow from operations and net proceeds from sale of
investments, less payments for capital expenditures, software and other deferred charges; |
|
|
|
Operational working capital refers to trade accounts receivable and inventories, net of
accounts payable. |
Change in Accounting Method
Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2007, we changed our method of accounting for inventories for
our U.S. operations from a combination of the use of the first-in, first-out (FIFO) and the
last-in, first-out (LIFO) methods to the FIFO method. The inventories for our international
operations continue to be valued using the FIFO method. We believe the change is preferable as the
FIFO method better reflects the current value of inventories on the unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet; provides better matching of revenue and expense in the unaudited
Consolidated Statement of Income; provides uniformity across our operations with respect to the
method for inventory accounting; and enhances comparability with peers. Furthermore, this
application of the FIFO method is consistent with our accounting of inventories for U.S. income tax
purposes.
The discussion that follows reflects our results that have been restated due to the accounting
change.
OVERVIEW AND OUTLOOK
Overview
Sales
Our sales increased 20% and 19% in the first three and six months of 2008, respectively, compared
to the same period last year, due primarily to the acquisitions of Paxar Corporation (Paxar) and
DM Label Group (DM Label), and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation.
21
Avery Dennison Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
Estimated change in sales due to: |
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
Organic sales growth (decline) |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
2 |
% |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
<4 |
|
|
|
<7 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Acquisitions, net of divestitures |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
<3 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Reported sales growth (1) |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Totals may not sum due to rounding |
On an organic basis, the decline of 1% in the three and six months ended June 28, 2008 reflected
continued weakness in U.S. markets, partially offset by sales growth internationally,
particularly in the emerging markets.
Net Income
Net income decreased approximately $5 million, or 3%, in the first six months of 2008 compared to
the same period in 2007.
Negative factors affecting the change in net income included:
|
|
|
Cost inflation, including raw material and energy costs |
|
|
|
|
Incremental interest expense and amortization of intangibles related to the Paxar
acquisition |
|
|
|
|
The carryover effect of a more competitive pricing environment in the roll materials
business in the prior year, partially offset by current year price increases |
|
|
|
|
Incremental transition costs related to acquisition integrations (primarily Paxar), and
higher asset impairment and restructuring charges related to restructuring actions |
Positive factors affecting the change in net income included:
|
|
|
Cost savings from productivity improvement initiatives, including savings from
restructuring actions |
|
|
|
|
Higher net sales, including sales from our recent acquisitions, and a benefit from
foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
Benefit of a lower effective tax rate |
Acquisitions
We completed the Paxar acquisition on June 15, 2007. The combination of the Paxar business into
our Retail Information Services segment increases our presence in the retail information and brand
identification market, combines complementary strengths and broadens the range of our product and
service capabilities, improves our ability to meet customer demands for product innovation and
improved quality of service, and facilitates expansion into new product and geographic segments.
The integration of the acquisition into our operations is also expected to result in significant
cost synergies. Refer to the Outlook section herein for further information.
We completed the DM Label acquisition on April 1, 2008. DM Label operations are included in our
Retail Information Services segment. The impact of this acquisition on revenues and earnings for
2008 is not anticipated to be significant.
See Note 2, Acquisitions, to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for
further information.
Paxar
Acquisition-related Actions
The following integration actions result in headcount reductions of approximately 1,695 positions
in our Retail Information Services segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paxar |
|
|
|
|
Acquisition- |
|
Headcount |
(Dollars in millions) |
|
related costs(1) |
|
Reduction |
|
2007 Restructuring (2) |
|
$ |
31.2 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
2007 Transition costs (2) |
|
|
43.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Restructuring (2) |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
2008 Transition costs (2) |
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
2007 Purchase price adjustments |
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
855 |
|
2008 Purchase price adjustments |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
Total Paxar integration actions |
|
$ |
119.0 |
|
|
|
1,695 |
|
|
Change-in-control costs (Purchase
price adjustment) |
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Paxar acquisition-related costs |
|
$ |
146.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes severance, asset impairment and lease cancellation charges, where
applicable |
|
(2) |
|
Recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Income |
22
Avery Dennison Corporation
Cost synergies resulting from the integration of Paxar were approximately $20 million in 2007 and
approximately $39 million in the first six months of 2008. Incremental cost synergies expected to
be achieved through the balance of the integration are discussed in the Outlook section below.
Refer to Note 2, Acquisitions and Note 10, Cost Reduction Actions, to the unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail.
Cost Reduction Actions
In addition to cost synergies from the integration of Paxar discussed above, cost reduction actions
initiated from late 2006 through the end of 2007 (see table below) are expected to yield annualized
pretax savings of $45 million to $50 million. Savings from these actions, net of transition costs,
were approximately $5 million in 2007 and approximately $20 million in the first six months of
2008. Incremental savings associated with these actions in the second half of 2008 are expected to
be in the range of $5 million to $10 million, with the balance expected to be realized in 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued |
|
|
Headcount |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Expense(1) |
|
|
Reduction |
|
|
Q4 2006 restructuring |
|
$ |
5.1 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
2007 restructuring (excluding Paxar
integration-related actions) |
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
Total Q4 2006-2007 restructuring actions |
|
$ |
31.4 |
|
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes severance, asset impairment and lease cancellation charges, where
applicable |
We are undertaking additional restructuring actions in 2008, in addition to Paxar
acquisition-related actions. The 2008 actions identified to date (see table below) are expected to
yield annualized savings of approximately $11 million, most of which is expected to benefit 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued |
|
|
Headcount |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Expense(1) |
|
|
Reduction |
|
|
Q1 2008 restructuring |
|
$ |
4.3 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
Q2 2008 restructuring |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
Total 2008 restructuring actions |
|
$ |
10.3 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes severance, asset impairment and lease cancellation charges, where
applicable |
See Note 10, Cost Reduction Actions, to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
for further information.
Effective Rate of Taxes on Income
The effective tax rate for the first six months of 2008 was 8%, compared with 22% for the same
period in 2007. The effective tax rate for the first six months of 2008 included the recognition
of a tax benefit of approximately $32 million due to the increased realizability of deferred tax
assets, partially offset by approximately $4 million of other discrete items (including
approximately $5 million of tax contingency accruals). Refer to Note 12, Taxes Based on Income,
to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
Free Cash Flow
Free cash flow, which is a non-GAAP measure, refers to cash flow from operating activities and net
proceeds from sale of investments, less spending on property, plant, equipment, software and other
deferred charges. We use free cash flow as a measure of funds available for other corporate
purposes, such as dividends, debt reduction, acquisitions, and repurchases of common stock.
Management believes that this measure provides meaningful supplemental information to our investors
to assist them in their financial analysis of the Company. Management believes that it is
appropriate to measure cash flow (including net proceeds from sale of investments) after spending
on property, plant, equipment, software and other deferred charges because such spending is
considered integral to
maintaining or expanding our underlying business. Net proceeds from sale of investments are
related to the sale of securities held by our captive insurance company. This measure is not
intended to represent the residual cash available for discretionary purposes. Refer to the Uses
and Limitations of Non-GAAP Measures section for further information regarding limitations of this
measure.
23
Avery Dennison Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
(In millions) |
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
188.7 |
|
|
$ |
130.9 |
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(69.1 |
) |
|
|
(94.7 |
) |
Purchase of software and other deferred charges |
|
|
(33.0 |
) |
|
|
(29.0 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of investments, net |
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow |
|
$ |
99.6 |
|
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
|
In the first six months of 2008, free cash flow increased due to lower spending on property, plant,
and equipment, the timing of payments associated with accounts payable, and net proceeds from sale
of investments, partially offset by payments for trade rebates and bonuses, as well as lower net
income. See Analysis of Results of Operations and Liquidity sections below for more
information.
Investigations
We previously announced that we had been notified by the European Commission (EC), the United
States Department of Justice (DOJ), the Competition Law Department of the Department of Justice
of Canada and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission of their respective criminal
investigations into competitive practices in the label stock industry. We cooperated with all of
these investigations, and all, except the Australian investigation which is continuing, have been
terminated without further action by the authorities.
We are a named defendant in purported class actions in the U.S. seeking treble damages and other
relief for alleged unlawful competitive practices, which were filed after the announcement of the
DOJ investigation.
As previously disclosed, we discovered instances of conduct by certain employees in China that
potentially violate the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. We reported that conduct to
authorities in the U.S. and we believe it is possible that fines or other penalties may be
incurred.
We are unable to predict the effect of these matters at this time, although the effect could be
adverse and material. These and other matters are reported in Note 16, Commitments and
Contingencies, to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Outlook
Certain statements contained in this section are forward-looking statements and are subject to
certain risks and uncertainties. Refer to our Safe Harbor Statement herein.
For the full year of 2008, we expect low double-digit revenue growth, including the benefit from
our recent acquisitions and a favorable effect from foreign currency translation based on current
exchange rates.
We estimate the total annual cost synergies associated with the Paxar integration to be
approximately $120 million, of which $20 million benefited 2007 and $39 million benefited the first
six months of 2008. We expect an approximate 85% of targeted synergies to be captured in the
Companys run rate by year-end. To accomplish our synergy target, we expect to incur aggregate
pretax cash costs in the range of $165 million to $180 million, of which approximately $75 million
was incurred in 2007 and approximately $34 million was incurred in the first six months of 2008.
We expect to incur an estimated $35 million in the second half of 2008.
We anticipate continued benefit from our ongoing productivity improvement initiatives. In addition
to the synergies resulting from the Paxar integration described above, we anticipate our prior year
restructuring and business realignment efforts to yield incremental savings in 2008 of $25 million
to $30 million, net of transition costs. Restructuring actions implemented in the first six months
of 2008 are expected to yield savings of approximately $11 million, most of which is expected to
benefit 2009.
We expect the above benefits to be more than offset by higher costs, including those related to raw
material and energy, as well as investments for future growth.
We anticipate price increases and productivity improvements in 2008 to partially offset raw
material inflation. The negative impact of changes in pricing was lower in the second quarter
compared to the first. This improving trend is expected to continue over the balance of the year
due to benefits from price increases expected to be realized in the second half.
24
Avery Dennison Corporation
We estimate interest expense in 2008 to be in the range of $115 million to $120 million,
approximately $10 million to $15 million higher than 2007, due to acquisition-related debt. Our
estimate is subject to changes in average debt outstanding and changes in market rates associated
with the portion of our debt tied to variable interest rates.
We anticipate total restructuring and asset impairment charges in 2008 to be lower than the charges
taken in 2007.
The annual effective tax rate, expected to be in the range of 14% to 16% for 2008, will be impacted
by future events including changes in tax laws, geographic income mix, tax audits, closure of tax
years, legal entity restructuring, and the release of valuation allowances on deferred tax assets.
The effective tax rate can potentially have wide variances from quarter to quarter, resulting from
interim reporting requirements and the recognition of discrete events.
We anticipate our capital and software expenditures before Paxar integration-related activities to
be approximately $170 million in 2008. Capital and software expenditures related to the Paxar
integration are expected to total $35 million to $40 million, of which approximately $8 million was
incurred in the first six months of 2008. We expect to incur incremental expenditures of $5
million to $10 million in the second half of 2008. These costs are included in the total one-time
cash cost estimate for the integration, discussed above.
Reflecting the foregoing assumptions, we expect an increase in annual earnings and free cash flow
in 2008 in comparison with 2007.
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SECOND QUARTER
Income Before Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,828.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,523.5 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
1,338.6 |
|
|
|
1,113.1 |
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
490.3 |
|
|
|
410.4 |
|
Marketing, general and administrative expense |
|
|
341.0 |
|
|
|
270.8 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
29.3 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
$ |
114.2 |
|
|
$ |
112.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a Percent of Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (margin) |
|
|
26.8 |
% |
|
|
26.9 |
% |
Marketing, general and administrative expense |
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
Sales
Sales increased 20% in the second quarter of 2008 compared to the same period last year, due
largely to the benefits from the Paxar acquisition, which increased sales by an estimated $205
million, and the DM Label acquisition, which increased sales by approximately $15 million. Foreign
currency translation had a favorable impact on the change in sales of approximately $96 million in
the second quarter of 2008.
On an organic basis, the decline of 1% in the second quarter of 2008 compared to the same period
last year reflected continued weakness in U.S. markets, partially offset by sales growth
internationally, particularly in the emerging markets. Weak market demand in the U.S. drove the
declines in our Retail Information Services and Office and Consumer Products segments, as well as
in our other specialty converting businesses. These declines were partially offset by organic
sales growth in the Pressure-sensitive Materials segment, reflecting strong sales in emerging
markets.
Refer to Results of Operations by Segment for further information on segments.
Gross Profit
Gross profit margin for the second quarter of 2008 declined compared to the same period in 2007, as
higher gross profit margin associated with sales from the Paxar acquisition and savings from prior
year restructuring and other sources of productivity were more than offset by the carryover effect
of prior year price competition in the roll materials business, higher raw material costs, and
negative
25
Avery Dennison Corporation
product mix shifts (lower sales of higher gross profit margin products), as well as
reduced fixed cost leverage due to lower sales on an organic basis.
Marketing, General and Administrative Expenses
The increase in marketing, general and administrative expense in the second quarter of 2008
compared to the same period last year primarily reflected costs associated with the recently
acquired businesses and related acquisition integration costs, net of synergies (totaling
approximately $58 million, including $5 million in incremental amortization of intangibles), the
negative effects of foreign currency (approximately $10 million), and higher employee costs. These
negative effects were partially offset by the benefits from productivity improvement initiatives and lower transition costs
associated with the Paxar integration.
Other Expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, pretax) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Restructuring costs |
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
|
$ |
.9 |
|
Asset impairment and lease cancellation charges |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Asset impairment charges acquisition integration-related |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
Other |
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
Other expense, net |
|
$ |
5.8 |
|
|
$ |
7.5 |
|
|
In the second quarter of 2008, Other expense, net consisted of restructuring costs including
severance and other employee-related costs, asset impairment and lease cancellation charges
(primarily in the Retail Information Services segment), and a gain on sale of investments.
Restructuring costs in the second quarter of 2008 relate to a reduction in headcount of
approximately 310 positions across all segments and geographic regions.
In the second quarter of 2007, Other expense, net consisted of software impairment charges
related to the integration of Paxar, restructuring costs including severance and other
employee-related costs, as well as expenses related to a divestiture ($.3 million), partially
offset by the reversal of an accrual related to a lawsuit ($3.2 million). Restructuring costs in
the second quarter of 2007 related to a reduction in headcount of approximately 20 positions in the
Pressure-sensitive Materials and Retail Information Services segments.
Refer to Note 10, Cost Reduction Actions, to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements for more information.
Net Income and Earnings per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
$ |
114.2 |
|
|
$ |
112.0 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
92.4 |
|
|
$ |
86.2 |
|
|
Net income per common share |
|
$ |
.94 |
|
|
$ |
.88 |
|
Net income per common share, assuming dilution |
|
$ |
.93 |
|
|
$ |
.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income as a percent of sales |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
|
(23.9 |
)% |
Net income per common share |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
(22.1 |
) |
Net income per common share, assuming dilution |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
|
Provision for Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2008 was 19%, compared with 23% for the same
period in 2007. The effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2008 included the recognition of
a tax benefit of approximately $12 million due to the increased realizability of deferred tax
assets, partially offset by approximately $6 million of other discrete items (including
approximately $5 million of tax contingency accruals). Refer to Note 12, Taxes Based on Income,
to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
26
Avery Dennison Corporation
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS BY SEGMENT FOR THE SECOND QUARTER
Pressure-sensitive Materials Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Net sales including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
1,025.7 |
|
|
$ |
920.8 |
|
Less intersegment sales |
|
|
(45.8 |
) |
|
|
(41.5 |
) |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
979.9 |
|
|
$ |
879.3 |
|
Operating income (1) |
|
|
80.0 |
|
|
|
89.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes a reversal of an accrual
related to a lawsuit in 2007, asset impairment
charges in 2008, and restructuring costs in both
years |
|
$ |
.4 |
|
|
$ |
(2.7 |
) |
|
Net Sales
Sales in our Pressure-sensitive Materials segment increased 11% in the second quarter of 2008
compared to the same period in 2007, reflecting the favorable impact of foreign currency
translation (approximately $73 million) and organic sales growth of approximately 3%, as unit
volume growth was partially offset by the negative effects of price and mix.
On an organic basis, sales in our roll materials business in Europe in the second quarter of 2008
grew at a mid single-digit rate compared to the same period last year. Market expansion in our
roll materials business contributed to double-digit organic growth in Asia and low single-digit
organic growth in Latin America. Partially offsetting this growth, our North American roll
materials business declined at a low single-digit rate (excluding intercompany sales), as volume
growth in this region was more than offset by negative price and mix.
On an organic basis, sales in our graphics and reflective business declined at a low single-digit
rate, reflecting lower promotional spending by businesses in response to weak market conditions.
Operating Income
Decreased operating income in the second quarter of 2008 reflected the negative effects of raw
material inflation and prior year price reductions, which more than offset the initial benefits of
recent price increases, higher unit volume, and cost savings from restructuring and productivity
improvement initiatives. Operating income for the quarter included restructuring costs in both
years, asset impairment charges in 2008, and a reversal of an accrual related to a lawsuit in 2007.
Retail Information Services Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Net sales including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
438.3 |
|
|
$ |
219.7 |
|
Less intersegment sales |
|
|
(.1 |
) |
|
|
(.3 |
) |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
438.2 |
|
|
$ |
219.4 |
|
Operating income (1) (2) |
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes lease cancellation charges in 2008, and asset impairment and
restructuring costs in both years |
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
$ |
9.9 |
|
(2) Includes transition costs related to acquisition integrations, primarily Paxar |
|
$ |
5.7 |
|
|
$ |
10.2 |
|
|
Net Sales
Sales in our Retail Information Services segment increased 100% in the second quarter of 2008
compared to the same period last year, which reflected sales from the Paxar acquisition, which
increased sales by an estimated $205 million, and the DM Label acquisition, which increased sales
by approximately $15 million, and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation
(approximately $7 million). On an organic basis, sales declined 3% in the second quarter of 2008
due to a decline in orders for apparel shipped to North American retailers and brand owners,
partially offset by increased sales for the European retail market.
Operating Income
Increased operating income in the second quarter of 2008 reflected higher sales and savings from
restructuring and productivity improvement initiatives and lower transition costs associated with the Paxar
integration, partially offset by higher employee-related, raw material and other cost inflation,
and incremental amortization of acquisition intangibles. Operating income for the quarter included
asset impairment charges and restructuring costs in both years, and lease cancellation charges in
2008.
27
Avery Dennison Corporation
Office and Consumer Products Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Net sales including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
255.7 |
|
|
$ |
263.1 |
|
Less intersegment sales |
|
|
(.3 |
) |
|
|
(.4 |
) |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
255.4 |
|
|
$ |
262.7 |
|
Operating income (1) |
|
|
40.1 |
|
|
|
42.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes restructuring costs in 2008 and expenses related to a divestiture in 2007 |
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
.3 |
|
|
Net Sales
Sales in our Office and Consumer Products segment decreased 3% in the second quarter of 2008
compared to the same period last year, reflecting lower sales on an organic basis, partially offset
by the favorable impact of foreign currency translation (approximately $8 million). On an organic
basis, sales declined 6% due to weak end market demand and a delay in orders related to
back-to-school season.
Operating Income
Decreased operating income in the second quarter of 2008 reflected lower sales and cost inflation,
partially offset by savings from restructuring actions and other productivity improvement initiatives.
Operating income for the quarter included restructuring costs in 2008 and expenses related to a
divestiture in 2007.
Other specialty converting businesses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Net sales including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
163.4 |
|
|
$ |
167.3 |
|
Less intersegment sales |
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
155.4 |
|
|
$ |
162.1 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
Net Sales
Sales in our other specialty converting businesses decreased 4% in the second quarter of 2008
compared to the same period in 2007. Reported sales growth included the favorable impact of
foreign currency translation (approximately $8 million). On an organic basis, sales declined 9% in
the second quarter of 2008, reflecting lower volumes in automotive and housing construction, and
the negative effect of exiting certain low-margin products in our specialty tape business,
partially offset by growth in our radio-frequency identification (RFID) division.
Operating Income
Decreased operating income in the second quarter of 2008 reflected lower sales and cost inflation,
partially offset by the benefit of productivity improvement initiatives and a reduction in operating loss in
our RFID division.
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS YEAR-TO-DATE
Income Before Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
3,474.1 |
|
|
$ |
2,913.4 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
2,559.8 |
|
|
|
2,138.7 |
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
914.3 |
|
|
|
774.7 |
|
Marketing, general and administrative expense |
|
|
669.0 |
|
|
|
519.1 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
58.8 |
|
|
|
35.2 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
$ |
175.1 |
|
|
$ |
210.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a Percent of Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (margin) |
|
|
26.3 |
% |
|
|
26.6 |
% |
Marketing, general and administrative expense |
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
28
Avery Dennison Corporation
Sales
Sales increased approximately 19% in the first six months of 2008 compared to the same period in
the prior year, due largely to the benefits from the Paxar acquisition, which increased sales by an
estimated $415 million, and the DM Label acquisition, which increased sales by approximately $15 million. Foreign currency translation had a favorable impact on the change in sales of
approximately $172 million in the first six months of 2008.
On an organic basis, the decline of 1% in the
first six months of 2008 reflected continued weakness
in U.S. markets, partially offset by sales growth internationally, particularly in the
emerging markets. Weak market demand in the U.S. drove the declines in our Retail Information
Services and Office and Consumer Products segments, as well as in our other specialty converting
businesses. These declines were partially offset by organic sales growth in the Pressure-sensitive
Materials segment, reflecting strong sales in emerging markets.
Refer to Results of Operations by Segment for further information on segments.
Gross Profit
Gross profit margin for the first six months of 2008 declined compared to the same period last
year, as higher gross profit margin associated with sales from the Paxar acquisition and savings
from prior year restructuring and other sources of productivity were more than offset by the
carryover effect of prior year price competition in the roll materials business, higher raw
material costs, and negative product mix shifts (lower sales of higher gross profit margin
products), as well as reduced fixed cost leverage due to lower sales on an organic basis.
Marketing, General and Administrative Expenses
The increase in marketing, general and administrative expense in the first six months of 2008
compared to the same period last year primarily reflected costs associated with the recently
acquired businesses and related acquisition integration costs, net of synergies (totaling
approximately $127 million, including $11 million in incremental amortization of intangibles and $4 million in incremental transition costs), the negative effects of foreign currency (approximately
$9 million), as well as higher employee costs, partially offset by the benefits from productivity improvement initiatives.
Other Expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, pretax) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Restructuring costs |
|
$ |
10.5 |
|
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
Asset impairment and lease cancellation charges |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Asset impairment charges acquisition integration-related |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
Other |
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
Other expense, net |
|
$ |
11.4 |
|
|
$ |
9.6 |
|
|
In the first six months of 2008, Other expense, net consisted of restructuring costs including
severance and other employee-related costs, asset impairment and lease cancellation charges (in the
Pressure-sensitive Materials and Retail Information Services segments), and a gain on sale of
investments. Restructuring costs in the first six months of 2008 relate to a reduction in
headcount of approximately 465 positions across all segments and geographic regions.
In the first six months of 2007, Other expense, net consisted of software impairment charges
related to the integration of Paxar, restructuring costs including severance and other
employee-related costs, and expenses related to a divestiture ($.3 million), partially offset by a
reversal of an accrual related to a lawsuit ($3.2 million). Restructuring costs in the first six
months of 2007 related to a reduction in headcount of approximately 95 positions, which impacted
each of our segments and geographic regions.
Refer to Note 10, Cost Reduction Actions, to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements for more information.
Net Income and Earnings per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
$ |
175.1 |
|
|
$ |
210.8 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
45.5 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
160.8 |
|
|
$ |
165.3 |
|
|
Net income per common share |
|
$ |
1.63 |
|
|
$ |
1.69 |
|
Net income per common share, assuming dilution |
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
|
$ |
1.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income as a percent of sales |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
(2.7 |
)% |
|
|
(9.5 |
)% |
Net income per common share |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
(7.7 |
) |
Net income per common share, assuming dilution |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
29
Avery Dennison Corporation
Provision for Income Taxes
The effective tax rate for the first six months of 2008 was 8%, compared with 22% for the same
period in 2007. The effective tax rate for the first six months of 2008 included the recognition
of a tax benefit of approximately $32 million due to the increased realizability of deferred tax
assets, partially offset by approximately $4 million of other discrete items (including
approximately $5 million of tax contingency accruals). Refer to Note 12, Taxes Based on Income,
to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS BY SEGMENT FOR THE SIX MONTHS YEAR-TO-DATE
Pressure-sensitive Materials Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Net sales including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
1,986.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,815.8 |
|
Less intersegment sales |
|
|
(86.6 |
) |
|
|
(76.5 |
) |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,899.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,739.3 |
|
Operating income (1) |
|
|
149.9 |
|
|
|
171.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes reversal of accrual
related to a lawsuit in 2007, asset impairment
charges in 2008, and restructuring costs in both
years |
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
$ |
(1.2 |
) |
|
Net Sales
Sales in our Pressure-sensitive Materials segment increased 9% in the first six months of 2008
compared to the same period in 2007, reflecting the favorable impact of foreign currency
translation (approximately $130 million) and organic sales growth of approximately 2%, as unit
volume growth was partially offset by the negative effects of price and mix.
On an organic basis, sales in our roll materials business in Europe in the first six months of 2008
grew at a low single-digit rate compared to the same period last year. Market expansion in our
roll materials business contributed to double-digit organic growth in Asia, and low single-digit
organic growth in Latin America. Partially offsetting this growth, our North American roll
materials business declined at a low single-digit rate (excluding intercompany sales), as volume
growth in this region was more than offset by negative price and mix.
On an organic basis, sales in our graphics and reflective business declined at a mid single-digit
rate, reflecting lower promotional spending by businesses in response to weak market conditions.
Operating Income
Decreased operating income in the first six months of 2008 reflected the negative effects of raw
material inflation and prior year price reductions, which more than offset the initial benefits of
recent price increases, higher unit volume, and cost savings from restructuring and productivity
improvement initiatives. Operating income for the six month period included restructuring costs in
both years, asset impairment charges in 2008, and a reversal of an accrual related to a lawsuit in
2007.
Retail Information Services Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Net sales including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
811.5 |
|
|
$ |
376.7 |
|
Less intersegment sales |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(.8 |
) |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
810.2 |
|
|
$ |
375.9 |
|
Operating income (1)(2) |
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes integration-related software impairment in 2007, asset impairment
and lease cancellation charges in 2008, and restructuring costs in both years |
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
|
$ |
9.9 |
|
(2) Includes transition costs related to acquisition integrations, primarily Paxar |
|
$ |
12.7 |
|
|
$ |
10.2 |
|
|
30
Avery Dennison Corporation
Net Sales
Sales in our Retail Information Services segment increased 116% in the first six months of 2008
compared to the same period last year, which reflected sales from the Paxar acquisition, which
increased sales by an estimated $415 million, and the DM Label acquisition, which increased sales
by approximately $15 million, and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation
(approximately $12 million). On an organic basis, sales declined 2% in the first six months of
2008 due to a decline in orders for apparel shipped to North American retailers and brand owners,
partially offset by increased sales for the European retail market.
Operating Income
Increased operating income in the first six months of 2008 reflected higher sales and savings from
restructuring and productivity improvement initiatives, partially offset by higher employee-related, raw
material and other cost inflation, and incremental amortization of acquisition intangibles and
transition costs. Operating income for the six month period included asset impairment charges and
restructuring costs in both years, and lease cancellation charges in 2008.
Office and Consumer Products Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Net sales including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
450.4 |
|
|
$ |
478.0 |
|
Less intersegment sales |
|
|
(.6 |
) |
|
|
(.9 |
) |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
449.8 |
|
|
$ |
477.1 |
|
Operating income (1) |
|
|
61.6 |
|
|
|
68.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes expenses related to a divestiture in 2007 and restructuring costs in both years |
|
$ |
4.3 |
|
|
$ |
.9 |
|
|
Net Sales
Sales in our Office and Consumer Products segment decreased 6% in the first six months of 2008
compared to the same period last year, reflecting lower sales on an organic basis, partially offset
by the favorable impact of foreign currency translation (approximately $15 million). On an organic
basis, sales declined 8% due to customer inventory reductions (an estimated $12 million), a delay
in orders related to back-to-school season, and weak end market demand.
Operating
Income
Decreased operating income in the first six months of 2008 reflected lower sales and cost
inflation, partially offset by savings from restructuring actions and other productivity improvement
initiatives. Operating income for the six month period included restructuring costs in both years,
and expenses related to a divestiture in 2007.
Other specialty converting businesses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Net sales including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
329.4 |
|
|
$ |
330.2 |
|
Less intersegment sales |
|
|
(14.8 |
) |
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
314.6 |
|
|
$ |
321.1 |
|
Operating income (1) |
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes restructuring costs in 2008 |
|
$ |
.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Net Sales
Sales in our other specialty converting businesses decreased 2% in the first six months of 2008
compared to the same period in 2007. Reported sales growth included the favorable impact of
foreign currency translation (approximately $14 million). On an organic basis, sales declined 6%
in the first six months of 2008, reflecting lower volumes in automotive and housing construction,
and the negative effect of exiting certain low-margin products in our specialty tape business,
partially offset by growth in our radio-frequency identification (RFID) division.
Operating Income
Decreased operating income in the first six months of 2008 reflected lower sales and cost
inflation, partially offset by the benefit of productivity improvement initiatives and a reduction in operating
loss in our RFID division. Operating income in the first six months of 2008
included restructuring charges.
31
Avery Dennison Corporation
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Liquidity
Cash Flow Provided by Operating Activities for the First Six Months:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
160.8 |
|
|
$ |
165.3 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
135.2 |
|
|
|
100.8 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
(32.8 |
) |
|
|
13.3 |
|
Asset impairment and net loss on sale and disposal of assets |
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Other non-cash items, net |
|
|
(16.2 |
) |
|
|
(9.9 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities |
|
|
(89.6 |
) |
|
|
(162.0 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
188.7 |
|
|
$ |
130.9 |
|
|
For cash flow purposes, changes in assets and liabilities exclude the impact of foreign currency
translation, the impact of acquisitions and certain non-cash transactions (discussed in the
Analysis of Selected Balance Sheet Accounts section below).
In 2008, cash flow provided by operating activities was impacted by lower net income. Changes in
working capital and other factors are discussed below:
Positive factors
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities mainly reflected improved payment terms
associated with accounts payable, partially offset by payments for trade rebates and
bonuses |
Negative factors
|
|
|
Accounts receivable reflected an increase in average days sales outstanding, primarily
due to seasonality and slower customer payments |
|
|
|
|
Inventory reflected higher inventory levels to support expected sales |
In 2007, cash flow provided by operating activities was impacted by higher net income. Changes in
working capital and other factors are discussed below:
Positive factors
|
|
|
Other receivables primarily reflected the timing of collection of value-added tax
receivables in Europe |
Negative factors
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable reflected the seasonal sales volume, including back-to-school,
and increase in the average days sales outstanding reflecting the timing of receipts from
customers |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities reflected the timing of payments, including
payments for trade rebates and bonuses |
|
|
|
|
Inventory reflected increased purchases to support increase in volume and seasonality |
Cash Flow Used in Investing Activities for the First Six Months:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
(69.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(94.7 |
) |
Purchase of software and other deferred charges |
|
|
(33.0 |
) |
|
|
(29.0 |
) |
Payments for acquisitions |
|
|
(125.0 |
) |
|
|
(1,284.1 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Proceeds from sale of investments, net |
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
.7 |
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
$ |
(209.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,405.4 |
) |
|
Payments for Acquisitions
On April 1, 2008, we completed the acquisition of DM Label, which is included in our Retail
Information Services segment.
On June 15, 2007, we completed the acquisition of Paxar. In accordance with the terms of the
acquisition agreement, each outstanding
share of Paxar common stock, par value $0.10 was converted into the right to receive $30.50 in
cash. The total purchase price for this transaction was approximately $1.33 billion, including
transaction costs of approximately $15 million.
32
Avery Dennison Corporation
Refer to Note 2, Acquisitions, to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for
more information.
Capital Spending
Significant capital projects during the first six months of 2008 included investments for expansion
in China and India serving both our materials and retail information services businesses.
Significant information technology projects during the first six months of 2008 included customer
service and standardization initiatives.
Proceeds from Sale of Investments
Net proceeds from sale of investments are related to the sale of securities held by our captive
insurance company.
Cash Flow Used in Financing Activities for the First Six Months:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Net change in borrowings and payments of debt |
|
$ |
114.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,412.2 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(87.6 |
) |
|
|
(85.4 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63.2 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options, net |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
30.5 |
|
Other |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
$ |
34.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,292.0 |
|
|
Borrowings and Repayment of Debt
In February 2008, one of our subsidiaries entered into a credit agreement for a term loan credit
facility with fifteen domestic and foreign banks for a total commitment of $400 million, which we
guaranteed, maturing February 8, 2011. Financing available under the agreement is permitted to be
used for working capital and other general corporate purposes, including acquisitions. The term
loan credit facility typically bears interest at an annual rate of, at the subsidiarys option,
either (i) between LIBOR plus 0.300% and LIBOR plus 0.850%, depending on the Companys debt ratings
by either Standard & Poors Rating Service (S&P) or Moodys Investors Service (Moodys), or
(ii) the higher of (A) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% or (B) the prime rate. We used the term
loan credit facility to reduce commercial paper borrowings previously issued to fund the
acquisition of Paxar. The term loan credit facility is subject to customary financial covenants,
including a maximum leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio.
During the first six months of 2007, we increased our short-term borrowings to initially fund the
Paxar acquisition transaction. Additionally, proceeds from borrowings were used to support
seasonal operational requirements and share repurchases.
Shareholders Equity
Our shareholders equity was approximately $2.20 billion at June 28, 2008 compared to approximately
$1.84 billion at June 30, 2007. Our dividend per share increased to $.82 in the first six months
of 2008 from $.80 in the first six months of 2007.
Share Repurchases
During the first six months of 2007, we repurchased approximately .8 million shares totaling $52
million. We also made cash payments of $11 million related to shares repurchased in 2006, but
settled in 2007.
Analysis of Selected Balance Sheet Accounts
Long-lived Assets
Goodwill increased approximately $142 million during the first six months of 2008 due to
preliminarily identified goodwill associated with the DM Label acquisition (approximately $66
million), foreign currency translation (approximately $62 million), and purchase price adjustments
(approximately $14 million) associated with the Paxar acquisition.
Other intangible assets resulting from business acquisitions decreased approximately $1 million
during the first six months of 2008, which reflected the third-party valuation of intangible assets
for the Paxar acquisition (approximately $8 million) and the impact of foreign currency translation
(approximately $7 million), partially offset by normal amortization expense (approximately $16
million).
Refer to Note 2, Acquisitions, to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for
more information.
Other assets increased approximately $20 million during the first six months of 2008 due primarily
to purchases of software and other
deferred charges, net of related amortization (approximately $15 million) and the impact of foreign
currency translation (approximately $3 million), an increase in the cash surrender value of
corporate-owned life insurance (approximately $3 million), partially offset by
33
Avery Dennison Corporation
sales and/or
disposals of software and other deferred charges (approximately $2 million) and a change in
long-term pension assets (approximately $2 million).
Other Shareholders Equity Accounts
The value of our employee stock benefit trusts decreased approximately $83 million during the first
six months of 2008 due to a decrease in the market value of shares held in the trust of
approximately $78 million, and the issuance of shares under our employee stock option and incentive
plans having a value of approximately $5 million.
Impact of Foreign Currency Translation for the First Six Months:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change in net sales |
|
$ |
172 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
Change in net income |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
International operations generated approximately 67% of our net sales in the first six months of
2008. Our future results are subject to changes in political and economic conditions and the
impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange and interest rates.
The benefit to sales from currency translation in the first six months of 2008 primarily reflected
a benefit from sales denominated in Euros and Swiss Francs, as well as sales in the currencies of
China, Brazil, and Australia, partially offset by a negative impact of sales in the currencies of
South Korea and South Africa.
Effect of Foreign Currency Transactions
The impact on net income from transactions denominated in foreign currencies may be mitigated
because the costs of our products are generally denominated in the same currencies in which they
are sold. In addition, to reduce our income statement exposure to transactions in foreign
currencies, we may enter into foreign exchange forward, option and swap contracts, where available
and appropriate.
Analysis of Selected Financial Ratios
We utilize certain financial ratios to assess our financial condition and operating performance, as
discussed below.
Operational Working Capital Ratio
Working capital (current assets minus current liabilities), as a percent of annualized net sales,
changed in 2008 primarily due to the impact of the Paxar acquisition, a decrease in short-term
debt, as well as an increase in trade accounts receivable and refundable income taxes, partially
offset by an increase in accounts payable.
Operational working capital, as a percent of annualized net sales, is a non-GAAP measure and is
shown below. We use this non-GAAP measure as a tool to assess our working capital requirements
because it excludes the impact of fluctuations due to our financing and other activities (that
affect cash and cash equivalents, deferred taxes and other current assets and other current
liabilities) that tend to be disparate in amount and timing and therefore, may increase the
volatility of the working capital ratio from period to period. Additionally, the items excluded
from this measure are not necessarily indicative of the underlying trends of our operations and are
not significantly influenced by the day-to-day activities that are managed at the operating level.
Refer to Uses and Limitations of Non-GAAP Measures. Our objective is to minimize our investment
in operational working capital, as a percentage of sales, by reducing this ratio, to maximize cash
flow and return on investment.
Operational Working Capital for the First Six Months:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(A) Working capital (current assets minus current liabilities) |
|
$ |
(8.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,064.3 |
) |
Reconciling items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(87.1 |
) |
|
|
(76.6 |
) |
Current deferred and refundable income taxes and other current assets |
|
|
(302.0 |
) |
|
|
(260.4 |
) |
Short-term and current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
825.8 |
|
|
|
1,894.3 |
|
Current deferred and payable income taxes and other current liabilities |
|
|
685.7 |
|
|
|
616.1 |
|
|
(B) Operational working capital |
|
$ |
1,114.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,109.1 |
|
|
(C) Annualized net sales (year-to-date sales, multiplied by 2) |
|
$ |
6,948.2 |
|
|
$ |
5,826.8 |
|
|
Working capital, as a percent of annualized net sales (A) ¸ (C) |
|
|
(.1 |
)% |
|
|
(18.3 |
)% |
|
Operational working capital, as a percent of annualized net sales (B) ¸ (C) |
|
|
16.0 |
% |
|
|
19.0 |
% |
|
34
Avery Dennison Corporation
As a percent of annualized sales, operational working capital in the first six months of 2008
decreased compared to the same period in the prior year. The primary factors contributing to this
change, which includes the impact of the Paxar acquisition and currency translation, are discussed
below.
Accounts Receivable Ratio
The average number of days sales outstanding was 62 days in the first six months of 2008 compared
to 65 days in the first six months of 2007, calculated using the two-quarter average trade accounts
receivable balance divided by the average daily sales for the first six months. The current year
average number of days sales outstanding was impacted by changes in payment terms with our
customers. The prior year average number of days sales outstanding was impacted primarily by the
Paxar acquisition in June 2007.
Inventory Ratio
Average inventory turnover was 7.7 in the first six months of 2008 compared to 7.2 in the first six
months of 2007, calculated using the annualized cost of sales (cost of sales for the first six
months multiplied by 2) divided by the two-quarter average inventory balance for the first six
months. The change is primarily due to improved inventory management, partially offset by higher
material costs. The prior year average inventory turnover was primarily impacted by the Paxar
acquisition in June 2007.
Accounts Payable Ratio
The average number of days payable outstanding was 55 days in the first six months of 2008 and
2007, calculated using the two-quarter average accounts payable balance divided by the average
daily cost of products sold for the first six months. The current year average number of days
payable was primarily due to improved payment terms. The prior year average number of days sales
outstanding was impacted primarily by the Paxar acquisition in June 2007.
Debt and Shareholders Equity Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
Total debt to total capital |
|
|
51.9 |
% |
|
|
56.6 |
% |
Return on average shareholders equity |
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
Return on average total capital |
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
The decrease in the total debt to total capital ratio was primarily due to an increase in
shareholders equity, as well as a net decrease in debt related to the funding of the Paxar
acquisition in June 2007.
Our various loan agreements in effect as of June 28, 2008 require that we maintain specified ratios
of consolidated debt and consolidated interest expense in relation to certain measures of income.
Under the loan agreements, the required debt covenant ratio for total debt to earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, and non-cash expenses may not exceed 3.5 to 1.0. The
Companys ratio at June 28, 2008 was 3.1 to 1.0. The required debt covenant ratio for earnings
before interest, taxes, and non-cash expenses, as a ratio to interest, may not be less than 3.5 to
1.0. The Companys ratio at June 28, 2008 was 3.9 to 1.0.
Decreases in the returns on average shareholders equity and total capital in the first six months
of 2008 compared to the first six months of 2007 were primarily due to lower net income and higher
equity, partially offset by lower total debt outstanding. These ratios are computed using
annualized net income (year-to-date net income multiplied by 2) and a three-quarter average
denominator for equity and total debt accounts.
Capital Resources
Capital resources include cash flows from operations and debt financing. We maintain adequate
financing arrangements at competitive rates. These financing arrangements consist of our
commercial paper programs in the U.S. and Europe, committed and uncommitted bank lines of credit in
the countries where we operate, callable commercial notes and long-term debt, including medium-term
notes.
Capital from Debt
Our total debt increased approximately $115 million in the first six months of 2008 to
approximately $2.37 billion compared to approximately $2.26 billion at year end 2007, reflecting
primarily an increase in short-term borrowings associated with the DM Label acquisition, partially
offset by a reduction of short-term borrowings used for general operational requirements. Refer to
the
Borrowings and Repayment of Debt in the Cash Flow Used in Financing Activities section above for
further information.
35
Avery Dennison Corporation
Credit ratings are a significant factor in our ability to raise short-term and long-term financing.
The credit ratings assigned to us also impact the interest rates on our commercial paper and other
borrowings. When determining a credit rating, the rating agencies place significant weight on our
competitive position, business outlook, consistency of cash flows, debt level and liquidity,
geographic dispersion and management team. We remain committed to retaining a solid investment
grade rating.
Our Credit Ratings as of June 28, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term |
|
|
Long-term |
|
|
Outlook |
|
|
Standard & Poors Rating Service (S&P) |
|
|
A-2 |
|
|
BBB+ |
|
Stable (1) |
Moodys Investors Service (Moodys) |
|
|
P2 |
|
|
Baa1 |
|
Negative |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In July 2008, S&P changed its outlook on our credit ratings from Stable to
Negative. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations, and Other Matters
Industry Investigations
We previously announced that we had been notified by the European Commission, the United States
Department of Justice (DOJ), the Competition Law Department of the Department of Justice of
Canada and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission of their respective criminal
investigations into competitive practices in the label stock industry. We cooperated with all of
these investigations, and all have been terminated without further action by the authorities with
the exception of the Australian investigation, which is continuing.
We are a named defendant in purported class actions in the U.S. seeking treble damages and other
relief for alleged unlawful competitive practices, which were filed after the announcement of the
DOJ investigation.
The Board of Directors created an ad hoc committee comprised of independent directors to oversee
the foregoing matters.
We are unable to predict the effect of these matters at this time, although the effect could be
adverse and material. These and other matters are reported in Note 16, Commitments and
Contingencies, to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Environmental
We have been designated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and/or other
responsible state agencies as a potentially responsible party (PRP) at sixteen waste disposal or
waste recycling sites, including Paxar sites, which are the subject of separate investigations or
proceedings concerning alleged soil and/or groundwater contamination and for which no settlement of
our liability has been agreed upon. We are participating with other PRPs at such sites, and
anticipate that our share of cleanup costs will be determined pursuant to remedial agreements to be
entered into in the normal course of negotiations with the EPA or other governmental authorities.
We have accrued liabilities for these and certain other sites, including sites in which
governmental agencies have designated us as a PRP, where it is probable that a loss will be
incurred and the cost or amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. However, because of the
uncertainties associated with environmental assessment and remediation activities, future expense
to remediate the currently identified sites and any sites which could be identified in the future
for cleanup could be higher than the liability currently accrued.
As of June 28, 2008, our estimated liability associated with compliance and remediation costs was
approximately $62 million, including estimated liabilities related to our recent acquisitions.
Other amounts currently accrued are not significant to our consolidated financial position, and
based upon current information, we believe that it is unlikely that the resolution of these matters
will significantly impact our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Other
In 2005, we contacted relevant authorities in the U.S. and reported the results of an internal
investigation of potential violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The transactions
at issue were carried out by a small number of employees of our reflective business in China, and
involved, among other things, impermissible payments or attempted impermissible payments. The
payments or attempted payments and the contracts associated with them appear to have been
relatively minor in amount and of limited duration. Corrective and disciplinary actions have been
taken. Sales of our reflective business in China in 2005 were approximately $7 million. Based on
findings to date, no changes to our previously filed financial statements are warranted as a result
of these matters. However, we believe that fines or other penalties could be incurred. While we
are unable to predict the financial or operating impact of any such
fines or penalties, we believe that our behavior in detecting, investigating, responding to and
voluntarily disclosing these matters to authorities should be viewed favorably.
36
Avery Dennison Corporation
We provide for an estimate of costs that may be incurred under our basic limited warranty at the
time product revenue is recognized. These costs primarily include materials and labor associated
with the service or sale of products. Factors that affect our warranty liability include the
number of units installed or sold, historical and anticipated rate of warranty claims on those
units, cost per claim to satisfy our warranty obligation and availability of insurance coverage.
As these factors are impacted by actual experience and future expectations, we assess the adequacy
of the recorded warranty liability and adjust the amounts as necessary.
On September 9, 2005, we completed the lease financing for a commercial facility (the Facility)
located in Mentor, Ohio, used primarily for the new headquarters and research center for our roll
materials division. The Facility consists generally of land, buildings, equipment and office
furnishings. We have leased the Facility under an operating lease arrangement, which contains a
residual value guarantee of $33.4 million. We do not expect the residual value of the Facility to
be less than the amount guaranteed.
We participate in international receivable financing programs with several financial institutions
whereby advances may be requested from these financial institutions. Such advances are guaranteed
by us. At June 28, 2008, we had guaranteed approximately $16 million.
As of June 28, 2008, we guaranteed up to approximately $22 million of certain of our foreign
subsidiaries obligations to their suppliers, as well as approximately $543 million of certain of
our subsidiaries lines of credit with various financial institutions.
In November 2007, we issued $400 million of 7.875% Corporate HiMEDS units, a mandatory
convertible debt issue. An additional $40 million of HiMEDS units were issued in December 2007 as
a result of the exercise of the overallotment allocation from the initial issuance. Each HiMEDS
unit is comprised of two components a purchase contract obligating the holder to purchase from us
a certain number of shares of our common stock in 2010 ranging from approximately 6.8 million to
approximately 8.6 million shares (depending on the quoted price per share of our common stock at
that time) and a senior note due in 2020. The net proceeds from the offering were approximately
$427 million, which were used to reduce commercial paper borrowings initially used to finance the
Paxar acquisition.
USES AND LIMITATIONS OF NON-GAAP MEASURES
We use certain non-GAAP financial measures that exclude the impact of certain events, activities or
strategic decisions. The accounting effects of these events, activities or decisions, which are
included in the GAAP measures, may make it difficult to assess the underlying performance of the
Company in a single period. By excluding certain accounting effects, both positive and negative
(e.g. gains on sales of assets, restructuring charges, asset impairments, effects of acquisitions
and related costs, etc.), from certain of our GAAP measures, management believes that it is
providing meaningful supplemental information to facilitate an understanding of the Companys
core or underlying operating results. These non-GAAP measures are used internally to evaluate
trends in our underlying business, as well as to facilitate comparison to the results of
competitors for a single period. We apply the anticipated full-year GAAP tax rate to the non-GAAP
adjustments to determine adjusted non-GAAP net income.
Limitations associated with the use of our non-GAAP measures include:
(1) for the calculation of
organic sales growth, the exclusion of foreign currency translation and the impact of acquisitions
and divestitures from reported sales growth; (2) for the calculation of free cash flow, the
exclusion of any mandatory debt service requirements and other uses of the cash generated by
operating activities that do not directly or immediately support the underlying business (such as
discretionary debt reductions, dividends, share repurchase, acquisitions, etc.); (3) for the
calculation of operational working capital, the exclusion of cash and cash equivalents, short-term
debt, deferred taxes, and other current assets and other current liabilities from working capital.
While some of the items the Company excludes from GAAP measures recur, these items tend to be
disparate in amount and timing. Based upon feedback from investors and financial analysts, we
believe that supplemental non-GAAP measures provide information that is useful to the assessment of
the Companys performance and operating trends.
RECENT ACCOUNTING REQUIREMENTS
During the first six months of 2008, certain other accounting and financial disclosure requirements
by the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the SEC were issued. Refer to Note 18, Recent
Accounting Requirements, to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for more
information.
SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT
The matters discussed in this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and other sections of this Quarterly Report contain forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
37
Avery Dennison Corporation
Act of 1995. These
statements, which are not statements of historical fact, may contain estimates, assumptions,
projections and/or expectations regarding future events, which may or may not occur. Words such as
aim, anticipate, assume, believe, continue, could, estimate, expect, guidance,
intend, may, objective, plan, potential, project, seek, shall, should, target,
will, would, or variations thereof and other expressions, which refer to future events and
trends, identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements, and financial or
other business targets, are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual
results to differ materially from expected results, performance or achievements of the Company
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
Certain of such risks and uncertainties are discussed in more detail in Part II, Item 1A, Risk
Factors, to this Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 28, 2008 and Part I, Item 1A, Risk
Factors, to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2007, and
include, but are not limited to, risks and uncertainties relating to investment in development
activities and new production facilities; fluctuations in cost and availability of raw materials;
ability of the Company to achieve and sustain targeted cost reductions, including synergies
expected from the integration of the Paxar business in the time and at the cost anticipated;
ability of the Company to generate sustained productivity improvement; successful integration of
acquisitions; successful implementation of new manufacturing technologies and installation of
manufacturing equipment; the financial condition and inventory strategies of customers; customer
and supplier concentrations; changes in customer order patterns; loss of significant contract(s) or
customer(s); timely development and market acceptance of new products; fluctuations in demand
affecting sales to customers; impact of competitive products and pricing; selling prices; business
mix shift; credit risks; ability of the Company to obtain adequate financing arrangements;
fluctuations in interest rates; fluctuations in pension, insurance and employee benefit costs;
impact of legal proceedings, including the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
investigation into industry competitive practices, and any related proceedings or lawsuits
pertaining to this investigation or to the subject matter thereof or of the concluded
investigations by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), the European Commission, and the Canadian
Department of Justice (including purported class actions seeking treble damages for alleged
unlawful competitive practices, which were filed after the announcement of the DOJ investigation),
as well as the impact of potential violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act based on
issues in China; changes in governmental regulations; changes in political conditions; fluctuations
in foreign currency exchange rates and other risks associated with foreign operations; worldwide
and local economic conditions; impact of epidemiological events on the economy and the Companys
customers and suppliers; acts of war, terrorism, natural disasters; and other factors.
The Company believes that the most significant risk factors that could affect its ability to
achieve its stated financial expectations in the near-term include (1) the impact of economic
conditions on underlying demand for the Companys products; (2) the degree to which higher raw
material and energy-related costs can be passed on to customers through selling price increases,
without a significant loss of volume; (3) the impact of competitors actions, including pricing,
expansion in key markets, and product offerings; (4) potential adverse developments in legal
proceedings and/or investigations regarding competitive activities, including possible fines,
penalties, judgments or settlements; and (5) the ability of the Company to achieve and sustain
targeted cost reductions, including expected synergies associated with the Paxar acquisition.
The Companys forward-looking statements represent judgment only on the dates such statements were
made. By making such forward-looking statements, the Company assumes no duty to update them to
reflect new, changed or unanticipated events or circumstances, other than as may be required by
law.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There are no material changes in the information provided in Part II, Item 7A of the Companys Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(f)) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Companys
Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated
to the Companys management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding the required disclosure.
In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any
controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable
assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management
necessarily is required to apply its judgement in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of
possible controls and procedures.
38
Avery Dennison Corporation
The Companys disclosure controls system is based upon a global chain of financial and general
business reporting lines that converge in the Companys headquarters in Pasadena, California. As
required by SEC Rule 13a-15(b), the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and
with the participation of the Companys management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer
and the Companys Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the quarter covered by this report.
Based on the foregoing, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have
concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable
assurance that information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated
to the Companys management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding the required disclosure.
As part of the ongoing integration of Paxar, the Company continues to assess the overall control
environment of this business and to integrate Paxar into the Companys reporting environment.
There has been no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the
Companys most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
39
Avery Dennison Corporation
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company has been designated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and/or other
responsible state agencies as a potentially responsible party (PRP) at sixteen waste disposal or
waste recycling sites, including Paxar sites, which are the subject of separate investigations or
proceedings concerning alleged soil and/or groundwater contamination and for which no settlement of
the Companys liability has been agreed. The Company is participating with other PRPs at such
sites, and anticipates that its share of cleanup costs will be determined pursuant to remedial
agreements entered into in the normal course of negotiations with the EPA or other governmental
authorities.
The Company has accrued liabilities for these and certain other sites, including sites in which
governmental agencies have designated the Company as a PRP, where it is probable that a loss will
be incurred and the cost or amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. However, because of the
uncertainties associated with environmental assessment and remediation activities, future expense
to remediate the currently identified sites and any sites which could be identified in the future
for cleanup could be higher than the liability currently accrued.
As of June 28, 2008, the Companys estimated liability associated with compliance and remediation
costs was approximately $62 million, including estimated liabilities related to the Companys
recent acquisitions.
Other amounts currently accrued are not significant to the consolidated financial position of the
Company and, based upon current information, management believes it is unlikely that the resolution
of these matters will significantly impact the Companys consolidated financial position, results
of operations or cash flows.
In April 2003, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a complaint challenging the then
proposed merger of UPM-Kymmene (UPM) and the Morgan Adhesives (MACtac) division of Bemis Co.,
Inc. (Bemis). The complaint alleged, among other things, that UPM and [Avery Dennison] have
already attempted to limit competition between themselves, as reflected in written and oral
communications to each other through high level executives regarding explicit anticompetitive
understandings, although the extent to which these efforts have succeeded is not entirely clear to
the United States at the present time. The DOJ concurrently announced a criminal investigation
into competitive practices in the label stock industry. Other investigations into competitive
practices in the label stock industry were subsequently initiated by the European Commission, the
Competition Law Division of the Department of Justice of Canada, and the Australian Competition and
Consumer Commission. The Company cooperated with all of these investigations, and all, except the
Australian investigation which is continuing, have subsequently been terminated without further
action by the authorities.
On April 24, 2003, Sentry Business Products, Inc. filed a purported class action on behalf of
direct purchasers of label stock in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois against the Company, UPM, Bemis and certain of their subsidiaries seeking treble damages
and other relief for alleged unlawful competitive practices, essentially repeating the underlying
allegations of the DOJ merger complaint. Ten similar complaints were filed in various federal
district courts. In November 2003, the cases were transferred to the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Pennsylvania and consolidated for pretrial purposes. Plaintiffs filed a
consolidated complaint on February 16, 2004, which the Company answered on March 31, 2004. On
April 14, 2004, the court separated the proceedings as to class certification and merits discovery,
and limited the initial phase of discovery to the issue of the appropriateness of class
certification. On January 4, 2006, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. On January 20, 2006,
the Company filed an answer to the amended complaint. On August 14, 2006, the plaintiffs moved to
certify a proposed class. The Company and other defendants opposed this motion. On March 1, 2007,
the court heard oral argument on the issue of the appropriateness of class certification. On
August 28, 2007, plaintiffs moved to lift the discovery stay, which the Company opposed. On
November 19, 2007, the court certified a class consisting of direct purchasers of self-adhesive
label stock from the defendants during the period from January 1, 1996 to July 25, 2003. The
Company filed a petition to appeal this decision on December 4, 2007, which was denied on March 6,
2008. On July 22, 2008, the district court held a hearing to set a schedule for merits discovery.
The court subsequently entered an order that requires the parties to complete fact discovery by
June 22, 2009. Dispositive motions are due on March 19, 2010. The Company intends to defend these
matters vigorously.
On May 21, 2003, The Harman Press filed in the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles,
California, a purported class action on behalf of indirect purchasers of label stock against the
Company, UPM and UPMs subsidiary Raflatac (Raflatac), seeking treble damages and other relief
for alleged unlawful competitive practices, essentially repeating the underlying allegations of the
DOJ merger complaint. Three similar complaints were filed in various California courts. In
November 2003, on petition from the parties, the California Judicial Council ordered the cases be
coordinated for pretrial purposes. The cases were assigned to a coordination trial judge in the
Superior Court for the City and County of San Francisco on March 30, 2004. On September 30, 2004,
the Harman Press amended
40
Avery Dennison Corporation
its complaint to add Bemis subsidiary Morgan Adhesives Company (MACtac) as a defendant. On
January 21, 2005, American International Distribution Corporation filed a purported class action on
behalf of indirect purchasers in the Superior Court for Chittenden County, Vermont. Similar
actions were filed by Richard Wrobel, on February 16, 2005, in the District Court of Johnson
County, Kansas; and by Chad and Terry Muzzey, on February 16, 2005 in the District Court of Scotts
Bluff County, Nebraska. On February 17, 2005, Judy Benson filed a purported multi-state class
action on behalf of indirect purchasers in the Circuit Court for Cocke County, Tennessee. The
Nebraska, Kansas and Vermont cases are currently stayed. Defendants motion to dismiss the
Tennessee case, filed on March 30, 2006, is pending. The Company intends to defend these matters
vigorously.
The Board of Directors created an ad hoc committee comprised of independent directors to oversee
the foregoing matters.
The Company is unable to predict the effect of these matters at this time, although the effect
could be adverse and material. These and other matters are reported in Note 16, Commitments and
Contingencies, to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In 2005, the Company contacted relevant authorities in the U.S. and reported on the results of an
internal investigation of potential violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The
transactions at issue were carried out by a small number of employees of the Companys reflective
business in China, and involved, among other things, impermissible payments or attempted
impermissible payments. The payments or attempted payments and the contracts associated with them
appear to have been relatively minor in amount and of limited duration. Corrective and
disciplinary actions have been taken. Sales of the Companys reflective business in China in 2005
were approximately $7 million. Based on findings to date, no changes to the Companys previously
filed financial statements are warranted as a result of these matters. However, the Company
expects that fines or other penalties could be incurred. While the Company is unable to predict
the financial or operating impact of any such fines or penalties, it believes that its behavior in
detecting, investigating, responding to and voluntarily disclosing these matters to authorities
should be viewed favorably.
The Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various other lawsuits, claims and inquiries, most
of which are routine to the nature of the Companys business. Based upon current information,
management believes that the resolution of these other matters will not materially affect the
Companys financial position.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Our ability to attain our goals and objectives is materially dependent on numerous factors and
risks, including but not limited to matters described in Part I, Item 1A, of the Companys Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
(a) |
|
Not Applicable |
|
(b) |
|
Not Applicable |
|
(c) |
|
Purchases of Equity Securities by Issuer |
The Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of shares of the Companys outstanding common
stock. Repurchased shares may be reissued under the Companys stock option and incentive plans or
used for other corporate purposes. Repurchases of equity securities during the second quarter
ended June 28, 2008 are listed in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Total shares |
|
|
Average price per |
|
|
authorization to |
|
(Shares in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
repurchased(1) |
|
|
share |
|
|
repurchase shares |
|
|
April 27, 2008 - May 24, 2008 |
|
|
26.0 |
|
|
$ |
48.55 |
|
|
|
4,154.7 |
|
May 25, 2008 - June 28, 2008 |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
49.15 |
|
|
|
4,154.7 |
|
|
Quarterly Total |
|
|
28.2 |
|
|
$ |
48.60 |
|
|
|
4,154.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes shares repurchased through non-cash activities that were delivered
(actually or constructively) to the Company by participants exercising stock options during
the second quarter of 2008 under the Companys stock option and incentive plans. |
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not Applicable
41
Avery Dennison Corporation
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Information called for in this Item during the period is incorporated by reference to Part II, Item
4 in the Companys Form 10-Q filed on May 8, 2008.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Not Applicable
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit 3.1
|
|
Restated Certification of Incorporation, filed August 2, 2002 with the Office of
Delaware Secretary of State, is incorporated by reference to the third quarterly report for 2002 on
Form 10-Q, filed November 12, 2002 |
|
|
|
Exhibit 3.2
|
|
By-laws, as amended, is incorporated by reference to the current report on Form 8-K,
filed July 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.1
|
|
Avery Dennison Office Products Company Credit Agreement, amended and restated |
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.2
|
|
Revolving Credit Agreement, amended and restated |
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.19.6
|
|
Forms of Equity Agreement |
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.19.7
|
|
Employee Stock Option and Incentive Plan, amended and restated |
|
|
|
Exhibit 12
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.1
|
|
D. A. Scarborough Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.2
|
|
D. R. OBryant Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
Exhibit 32.1
|
|
D. A. Scarborough Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
Exhibit 32.2
|
|
D. R. OBryant Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
42
Avery Dennison Corporation
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION
(Registrant)
|
|
|
/s/ Daniel R. OBryant
|
|
|
Daniel R. OBryant |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Finance, and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mitchell R. Butier
|
|
|
Mitchell R. Butier |
|
|
Corporate Vice President, Global Finance, and
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
August 7, 2008 |
|
|
43