FLOWERS FOODS, INC.
United States
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended July 12, 2008 |
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
|
|
For the transition period from ____________ to ______________ |
Commission file number 1-16247
FLOWERS FOODS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
GEORGIA
|
|
58-2582379 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
|
|
|
1919 FLOWERS CIRCLE, THOMASVILLE, GEORGIA
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer and smaller reporting
company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated
filer þ | Accelerated
filer o | Non-accelerated
filer o (Do not
check if a smaller reporting
company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
TITLE OF EACH CLASS
|
|
OUTSTANDING AT AUGUST 15, 2008 |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $.01 par value with
Preferred Share Purchase Rights
|
|
94,173,334 |
FLOWERS FOODS, INC.
INDEX
2
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements contained in this filing and certain other written or oral statements made from
time to time by the company and its representatives that are not historical facts are
forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements relate to current expectations regarding our future financial condition
and results of operations and are often identified by the use of words and phrases such as
anticipate, believe, continue, could, estimate, expect, intend, may, plan,
predict, project, should, will, would, is likely to, is expected to or will
continue, or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These forward-looking
statements are based upon assumptions we believe are reasonable.
Forward-looking statements are based on current information and are subject to risks and
uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected.
Certain factors that may cause actual results, performance, and achievements to differ materially
from those projected are discussed in this report and may include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
unexpected changes in any of the following: (i) general economic and business conditions;
(ii) the competitive setting in which we operate, including changes in pricing, advertising
or promotional strategies by us or our competitors, as well as changes in consumer demand;
(iii) interest rates and other terms available to us on our borrowings; (iv) energy and raw
materials costs and availability and hedging counter-party risks; (v) relationships with our
employees, independent distributors and third party service providers; and (vi) laws and
regulations (including environmental and health-related issues), accounting standards or tax
rates in the markets in which we operate; |
|
|
|
|
the loss or financial instability of any significant customer(s); |
|
|
|
|
our ability to execute our business strategy, which may involve integration of recent
acquisitions or the acquisition or disposition of assets at presently targeted values; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to operate existing, and any new, manufacturing lines according to schedule; |
|
|
|
|
the level of success we achieve in developing and introducing new products and entering
new markets; |
|
|
|
|
changes in consumer behavior, trends and preferences, including health and whole grain
trends; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to implement new technology as required; |
|
|
|
|
the credit and business risks associated with our independent distributors and customers
which operate in the highly competitive retail food and foodservice industries, including
the amount of consolidation in these industries; |
|
|
|
|
customer and consumer reaction to pricing actions; and |
|
|
|
|
any business disruptions due to political instability, armed hostilities, incidents of
terrorism, natural disasters or the responses to or repercussions from any of these or
similar events or conditions and our ability to insure against such events. |
The foregoing list of important factors does not include all such factors nor necessarily
present them in order of importance. In addition, you should consult other disclosures made by the
company (such as in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or in
company press releases) for other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from
those projected by the company. Please refer to Part I, Item 1A., Risk Factors, in the companys
Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2007 for additional information regarding factors that
could affect the companys results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
We caution you not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, as they speak only
as of the date made and are inherently uncertain. The company undertakes no obligation to publicly
revise or update such statements, except as required by law. You are advised, however, to consult
any further public disclosures by the company (such as in our filings with the SEC or in company
press releases) on related subjects.
3
FLOWERS FOODS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in thousands
except share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JULY 12, 2008 |
|
|
DECEMBER 29, 2007 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
19,532 |
|
|
$ |
19,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable, net of allowances of $649 and $131, respectively |
|
|
164,865 |
|
|
|
137,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
|
16,344 |
|
|
|
14,257 |
|
Packaging materials |
|
|
12,056 |
|
|
|
10,809 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
23,769 |
|
|
|
22,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,169 |
|
|
|
47,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spare parts and supplies |
|
|
29,679 |
|
|
|
28,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
6,228 |
|
|
|
1,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
26,547 |
|
|
|
33,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
299,020 |
|
|
|
269,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $580,620 and $556,960, respectively |
|
|
489,952 |
|
|
|
486,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes Receivable |
|
|
91,334 |
|
|
|
88,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Held for Sale Distributor Routes |
|
|
10,362 |
|
|
|
12,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
36,214 |
|
|
|
32,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
76,338 |
|
|
|
76,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Intangible Assets, net |
|
|
21,178 |
|
|
|
22,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,024,398 |
|
|
$ |
987,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital leases |
|
$ |
3,300 |
|
|
$ |
6,920 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
111,016 |
|
|
|
98,302 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
95,945 |
|
|
|
108,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
210,261 |
|
|
|
213,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt and Capital Leases |
|
|
29,372 |
|
|
|
22,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
49,250 |
|
|
|
50,974 |
|
Other |
|
|
37,918 |
|
|
|
36,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other liabilities |
|
|
87,168 |
|
|
|
87,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority Interest in Variable Interest Entity |
|
|
9,109 |
|
|
|
7,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock $100 par value, 200,000 authorized and none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock $.01 par value, 800,000 authorized and none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $.01 par value, 500,000,000 authorized shares, 101,659,924 shares and 101,659,924
shares issued, respectively |
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
1,017 |
|
Treasury stock 9,485,247 shares and 9,755,350 shares, respectively |
|
|
(152,233 |
) |
|
|
(154,801 |
) |
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
485,963 |
|
|
|
484,472 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
337,760 |
|
|
|
303,386 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
15,981 |
|
|
|
22,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
688,488 |
|
|
|
656,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,024,398 |
|
|
$ |
987,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements)
4
FLOWERS FOODS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Amounts in thousands
except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR THE TWELVE WEEKS ENDED |
|
|
FOR THE TWENTY-EIGHT WEEKS ENDED |
|
|
|
JULY 12, 2008 |
|
|
JULY 14, 2007 |
|
|
JULY 12, 2008 |
|
|
JULY 14, 2007 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
540,656 |
|
|
$ |
477,838 |
|
|
$ |
1,217,363 |
|
|
$ |
1,087,785 |
|
Materials, supplies, labor and other production
costs (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization shown separately below) |
|
|
293,594 |
|
|
|
244,942 |
|
|
|
643,564 |
|
|
|
551,894 |
|
Selling, marketing and administrative expenses |
|
|
197,662 |
|
|
|
183,592 |
|
|
|
449,337 |
|
|
|
421,555 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
16,032 |
|
|
|
15,116 |
|
|
|
36,945 |
|
|
|
35,233 |
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
2,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on insurance recovery |
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
36,360 |
|
|
|
34,188 |
|
|
|
90,509 |
|
|
|
79,103 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(494 |
) |
|
|
(740 |
) |
|
|
(1,173 |
) |
|
|
(2,149 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
3,151 |
|
|
|
2,672 |
|
|
|
7,327 |
|
|
|
6,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and minority interest |
|
|
39,017 |
|
|
|
36,120 |
|
|
|
96,663 |
|
|
|
82,968 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
13,931 |
|
|
|
12,914 |
|
|
|
34,493 |
|
|
|
29,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest |
|
|
25,086 |
|
|
|
23,206 |
|
|
|
62,170 |
|
|
|
53,554 |
|
Minority interest in variable interest entity |
|
|
(1,137 |
) |
|
|
(1,016 |
) |
|
|
(2,438 |
) |
|
|
(2,871 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
23,949 |
|
|
$ |
22,190 |
|
|
$ |
59,732 |
|
|
$ |
50,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Per Common Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share |
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
91,724 |
|
|
|
90,761 |
|
|
|
91,710 |
|
|
|
90,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share |
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
92,501 |
|
|
|
92,413 |
|
|
|
92,415 |
|
|
|
92,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid per common share |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.125 |
|
|
$ |
0.275 |
|
|
$ |
0.208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements)
5
FLOWERS FOODS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
in Excess |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Par |
|
|
of Par |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares Issued |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except for share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 29,
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,659,924 |
|
|
$ |
1,017 |
|
|
$ |
484,472 |
|
|
$ |
303,386 |
|
|
$ |
22,141 |
|
|
|
(9,755,350 |
) |
|
$ |
(154,801 |
) |
|
$ |
656,215 |
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
59,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,732 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
(6,270 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,270 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,270 |
) |
Amortization of prior
service costs |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
53,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,588 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252,426 |
|
|
|
4,027 |
|
|
|
2,439 |
|
Issuance of restricted
stock award |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,984 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249,880 |
|
|
|
3,984 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Issuance of deferred
stock award |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,045 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
Amortization of deferred
and restricted stock
awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,181 |
|
Stock option compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,318 |
|
Tax benefits related to
share based awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,858 |
|
Stock repurchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(256,248 |
) |
|
|
(5,829 |
) |
|
|
(5,829 |
) |
Dividends paid $0.275
per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,358 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,358 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at July 12, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,659,924 |
|
|
$ |
1,017 |
|
|
$ |
485,963 |
|
|
$ |
337,760 |
|
|
$ |
15,981 |
|
|
|
(9,485,247 |
) |
|
$ |
(152,233 |
) |
|
$ |
688,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements)
6
FLOWERS FOODS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in
thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR THE TWENTY-EIGHT WEEKS ENDED |
|
|
|
JULY 12, 2008 |
|
|
JULY 14, 2007 |
|
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (DISBURSED FOR) OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
59,732 |
|
|
$ |
50,683 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock based compensation |
|
|
6,678 |
|
|
|
10,478 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
36,945 |
|
|
|
35,233 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(2,232 |
) |
|
|
(1,408 |
) |
Provision for inventory obsolescence |
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
497 |
|
Allowances for accounts receivable |
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
662 |
|
Minority interest in variable interest entity |
|
|
2,438 |
|
|
|
2,871 |
|
Other |
|
|
(2,467 |
) |
|
|
(225 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable, net |
|
|
(27,586 |
) |
|
|
(8,509 |
) |
Inventories, net |
|
|
(5,324 |
) |
|
|
(2,336 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(2,834 |
) |
|
|
1,870 |
|
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities |
|
|
(10,662 |
) |
|
|
13,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
56,081 |
|
|
|
103,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (DISBURSED FOR) INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(41,964 |
) |
|
|
(33,445 |
) |
Increase of notes receivable |
|
|
(3,363 |
) |
|
|
(10,130 |
) |
Other |
|
|
3,603 |
|
|
|
1,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH DISBURSED FOR INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
(41,724 |
) |
|
|
(42,196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (DISBURSED FOR) FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(25,358 |
) |
|
|
(19,099 |
) |
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
2,439 |
|
|
|
3,544 |
|
Income tax benefit related to stock awards |
|
|
1,713 |
|
|
|
2,547 |
|
Stock repurchases |
|
|
(5,829 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in book overdraft |
|
|
8,989 |
|
|
|
3,116 |
|
Proceeds from debt borrowings |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
110,500 |
|
Debt and capital lease obligation payments |
|
|
(26,757 |
) |
|
|
(162,076 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH DISBURSED FOR FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
(14,803 |
) |
|
|
(61,468 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(446 |
) |
|
|
(650 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
19,978 |
|
|
|
13,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
19,532 |
|
|
$ |
13,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements)
7
FLOWERS FOODS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements of Flowers Foods, Inc. (the company) have been prepared by the companys management in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and
applicable rules and regulations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Accordingly,
they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting
principles for annual financial statements. In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements included herein contain all adjustments (consisting of only
normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the companys financial position, the
results of its operations and its cash flows. The results of operations for the twelve and
twenty-eight week periods ended July 12, 2008 and July 14, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of
the results to be expected for a full year. The balance sheet at December 29, 2007 has been derived
from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.
These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto included in the companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 29, 2007.
ESTIMATES The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The
company believes the following critical accounting estimates affect its more significant judgments
and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements: revenue
recognition, derivative instruments, valuation of long-lived assets, goodwill and other
intangibles, self-insurance reserves, income tax expense and accruals and pension obligations.
These estimates are summarized in the companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 29, 2007.
REPORTING PERIODS The company operates on a 52-53 week fiscal year ending the Saturday nearest
December 31. Fiscal 2008 consists of 53 weeks, with the companys quarterly reporting periods as
follows: first quarter ended April 19, 2008 (sixteen weeks), second quarter ended July 12, 2008
(twelve weeks), third quarter ending October 4, 2008 (twelve weeks) and fourth quarter ending
January 3, 2009 (thirteen weeks).
SEGMENTS The company consists of two business segments: direct-store-delivery (DSD), formerly
referred to as Flowers Foods Bakeries Group, and warehouse delivery, formerly referred to as
Flowers Foods Specialty Group. The DSD segment focuses on the production and marketing of bakery
products to customers in the southeastern, southwestern and mid-Atlantic areas of the United States
primarily through its direct-store-delivery system. The warehouse delivery segment produces snack
cakes for sale to co-pack, retail and vending customers as well as frozen bread, rolls and buns for
sale to retail and foodservice customers primarily through warehouse distribution.
SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMER Following is the effect our largest customer, Wal-Mart/Sams Club, had on
the companys sales for the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008 and July 14, 2007. No
other customer accounted for 10% or more of the companys sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR THE TWELVE WEEKS ENDED |
|
|
FOR THE TWENTY-EIGHT WEEKS ENDED |
|
|
|
JULY 12, 2008 |
|
|
JULY 14, 2007 |
|
|
JULY 12, 2008 |
|
|
JULY 14, 2007 |
|
|
|
(Percent of Sales) |
|
|
(Percent of Sales) |
|
DSD |
|
|
18.3 |
% |
|
|
17.6 |
% |
|
|
18.1 |
% |
|
|
17.1 |
% |
Warehouse delivery |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
21.1 |
% |
|
|
20.2 |
% |
|
|
20.6 |
% |
|
|
19.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
2. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Other comprehensive income (loss) results from derivative financial instruments and
amortization of prior service costs related to the companys defined benefit and postretirement
plans pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 158, Employers
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB
Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132R (SFAS 158). Total comprehensive income, determined as net
income adjusted by other comprehensive income (loss), was $1.4 million and $53.6 million for the
twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008, respectively. Total comprehensive income was
$25.1 million and $54.5 million for the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended July 14, 2007,
respectively.
During the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008, changes to accumulated other comprehensive
income, net of income tax, were as follows (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income, December 29, 2007 |
|
$ |
22,141 |
|
Derivative transactions: |
|
|
|
|
Net deferred gains on closed contracts, net of income tax of $(958) |
|
|
(1,530 |
) |
Reclassified to
earnings, net of income tax of $182 |
|
|
291 |
|
Effective portion of change in fair value of hedging instruments, net of income tax of $(3,149) |
|
|
(5,031 |
) |
Amortization of prior service costs, net of income tax of $69 |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income, July 12, 2008 |
|
$ |
15,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
3. GAIN ON SALE OF ASSETS
During the second quarter of fiscal 2008 the company completed the sale and closure of a plant in
Atlanta, Georgia resulting in a gain of $2.3 million. The company incurred $1.3 million of cost of
goods sold expenses primarily for employee severance, obsolete inventory, and equipment relocation
costs. An additional $0.3 million is included in selling, marketing and administrative expenses.
4. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES
There were no changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the twenty-eight weeks ended July
12, 2008. The balance as of July 12, 2008 is as follows (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
DSD |
|
$ |
71,861 |
|
Warehouse delivery |
|
|
4,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
76,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 12, 2008 and December 29, 2007, the company had the following amounts related to
amortizable intangible assets (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 12, 2008 |
|
|
December 29, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net Value |
|
Trademarks |
|
$ |
12,208 |
|
|
$ |
1,040 |
|
|
$ |
11,168 |
|
|
$ |
12,208 |
|
|
$ |
826 |
|
|
$ |
11,382 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
13,434 |
|
|
|
4,090 |
|
|
|
9,344 |
|
|
|
13,434 |
|
|
|
3,426 |
|
|
|
10,008 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
1,874 |
|
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
1,874 |
|
|
|
1,213 |
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
27,516 |
|
|
$ |
6,338 |
|
|
$ |
21,178 |
|
|
$ |
27,516 |
|
|
$ |
5,465 |
|
|
$ |
22,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the sale of Mrs. Smiths Bakeries frozen dessert business in April 2003,
the company entered into a 5-year non-compete agreement (agreement) with Schwan valued at $3.0
million recorded as an intangible liability. The company recognized income related to this
agreement as a reduction of amortization expense over the life of the agreement. The carrying
amount of this liability at December 29, 2007 was $0.2 million and was fully accreted to income
during the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008.
9
Aggregate amortization expense for the twelve weeks ended July 12, 2008 and July 14, 2007 were
as follows (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Amortizable intangible assets expense |
|
$ |
393 |
|
|
$ |
539 |
|
Amortizable intangible liabilities (income) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(138 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
371 |
|
|
$ |
390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate amortization expense for the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008 and July 14,
2007 were as follows (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Amortizable intangible assets expense |
|
$ |
873 |
|
|
$ |
1,259 |
|
Amortizable intangible liabilities (income) |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
(323 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
654 |
|
|
$ |
911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated amortization of intangibles for each of the next five years is as follows (amounts
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of |
|
|
|
Intangibles |
|
Remainder of 2008 |
|
$ |
777 |
|
2009 |
|
|
1,658 |
|
2010 |
|
|
1,633 |
|
2011 |
|
|
1,633 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,633 |
|
5. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157 establishes a common definition for fair
value to be applied to U.S. GAAP requiring use of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value, and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective
for financial assets and financial liabilities for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
The implementation of SFAS No. 157 for financial assets and financial liabilities, effective
December 30, 2007, did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position and
results of operations. Please refer to Note 5 Derivative Financial Instruments for a detailed
discussion.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS
No. 141R). SFAS No. 141R provides revised guidance on how acquirers recognize and measure the
consideration transferred, identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, noncontrolling
interests, and goodwill acquired in a business combination. SFAS No. 141R also expands required
disclosures surrounding the nature and financial effects of business combinations. SFAS No. 141R is
effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company
is currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 141R on its consolidated balance sheet and statements
of income.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements (SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160 establishes requirements for ownership interests
in subsidiaries held by parties other than the company (sometimes called minority interests) be
clearly identified, presented, and disclosed in the consolidated statement of financial position
within equity, but separate from the parents equity. All changes in the parents ownership
interests are required to be accounted for consistently as equity transactions and any
noncontrolling equity investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries must be measured initially at fair
value. SFAS No. 160 is effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2008. However, presentation and disclosure requirements must be retrospectively applied to
comparative financial statements. The company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 160 on
its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 expands
quarterly disclosure requirements in SFAS No. 133 about an entitys derivative instruments and
hedging activities. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008.
The company is currently evaluating the requirements of SFAS No. 161. The adoption of SFAS No. 161
is not expected to have an impact on the companys financial position, results of operations or
cash flows as the pronouncement addresses disclosure requirements only.
10
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (SFAS 162). SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework
for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of
nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles. SFAS 162 is effective 60 days following the Securities and Exchange Commissions
approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. We do not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS 162 will
materially impact the company.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF No. 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in
Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities. The FSP addresses whether
instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to
vesting and therefore need to be included in the earnings allocation in calculating earnings per
share under the two-class method described in SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share. The FSP requires
companies to treat unvested share-based payment awards that have non-forfeitable rights to dividend
or dividend equivalents as a separate class of securities in calculating earnings per share. The
FSP is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008; earlier application is not
permitted. The company does not expect adoption of FSP EITF No. 03-6-1 to have a material effect on
its results of operations or earnings per share.
6. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
In the first fiscal quarter of fiscal 2008 the company began measuring the fair value of its
derivative portfolio using common definitions under SFAS No. 157, which defines fair value as the
price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal
market for that asset or liability. Under SFAS No. 157, measurements are classified into a
hierarchy by the inputs used to perform the fair value calculation as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1: |
|
Fair value based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets |
|
|
|
Level 2: |
|
Modeled fair value with model inputs that are all observable market values |
|
|
|
Level 3: |
|
Modeled fair value with at least one model input that is not an observable market value |
This change in measurement technique had no material impact on the reported value of our derivative
portfolio.
COMMODITY PRICE RISK
The company enters into commodity derivatives, designated as cash-flow hedges of existing or
future exposure to changes in commodity prices. The companys primary raw materials are flour,
sweeteners and shortening, along with pulp, paper and petroleum-based packaging products. Natural
gas, which is used as oven fuel, is also an important commodity input to production.
As of July 12, 2008, the companys commodity hedge portfolio contained derivatives with a fair
value of $13.9 million, which is recorded in the following accounts with fair values measured as
indicated (amounts in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current |
|
$ |
10.9 |
|
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13.8 |
|
Other long-term |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Fair Value |
|
$ |
10.9 |
|
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The positions held in the portfolio are used to hedge economic exposure to changes in various
raw material prices and effectively fix the price, or limit increases in prices, for a period of
time extending into fiscal 2009. Under SFAS 133, these instruments are designated as cash-flow
hedges. The effective portion of changes in fair value for these derivatives is recorded each
period in other comprehensive income (loss), and any ineffective portion of the change in fair
value is recorded to current period earnings in selling, marketing and administrative expenses. The
company held no commodity derivatives at July 12, 2008 or December 29, 2007 that did not qualify
for hedge accounting under SFAS 133. During the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008, an
immaterial amount was recorded to income due to changes in fair value of these instruments.
11
As of July 12, 2008, the balance in accumulated other comprehensive income related to
commodity derivative transactions was $13.3 million. Of this total, approximately $7.6 million and
$0.9 million were related to instruments expiring in 2008 and 2009, respectively, and $4.8 million
was related to deferred gains on cash flow hedge positions.
INTEREST RATE RISK
On July 9, 2008, the company entered an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $85.0
million to fix the interest rate on a portion of the $150 million term loan secured on August 1,
2008 to fund the acquisitions of ButterKrust Bakery and Holsum Bakery, Inc.
The interest rate swap agreement results in the company paying or receiving the difference
between the fixed and floating rates at specified intervals calculated based on the notional
amount. The interest rate differential to be paid or received will be recorded as interest expense.
Under SFAS 133, this swap transaction is designated as a cash-flow hedge. Accordingly, the
effective portion of the change in the fair value of the swap transaction is recorded each period
in other comprehensive income. Any ineffective portion of the change in fair value is recorded to
current period earnings in selling, marketing and administrative expenses.
As of July 12, 2008, the fair value of the interest rate swap was $(0.1) million, which is
recorded in the following accounts with fair values measured as indicated (amounts in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other long-term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Other long-term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Fair Value |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008, interest expense was not impacted by periodic
settlements of the swaps.
As of July 12, 2008, the balance in accumulated other comprehensive income related to interest
rate derivative transactions was $(0.05) million. Of this total, approximately $(0.15) million,
$(0.35) million, $0.05 million, $0.17 million, $0.17 million and $0.06 million, were related to
instruments expiring in 2008 through 2013, respectively.
7. DEBT AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS
Long-term debt and capital leases consisted of the following at July 12, 2008 and December 29,
2007 (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JULY 12, 2008 |
|
|
DECEMBER 29, 2007 |
|
Unsecured credit facility |
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
22,854 |
|
|
|
23,796 |
|
Other notes payable |
|
|
3,818 |
|
|
|
5,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,672 |
|
|
|
29,428 |
|
Less current maturities |
|
|
3,300 |
|
|
|
6,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt and capital leases |
|
$ |
29,372 |
|
|
$ |
22,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The company has a five-year, $250.0 million unsecured revolving loan facility (the credit
facility) expiring October 5, 2012. The company may request to increase its borrowings under the
credit facility up to an aggregate of $350.0 million upon the satisfaction of certain conditions.
Proceeds from the credit facility may be used for working capital and general corporate purposes,
including acquisition financing, refinancing of indebtedness and share repurchases. The credit
facility includes certain customary restrictions, which, among other things, require maintenance of
financial covenants and limit encumbrance of assets and creation of indebtedness. Restrictive
financial covenants include such ratios as a minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum leverage
ratio. The company believes that, given its current cash position, its cash flow from operating
activities and its available credit capacity, it can comply with the current terms of the credit
facility and can meet presently foreseeable financial requirements. As of July 12, 2008 and
December 29, 2007, the company was in compliance with all restrictive financial covenants under its
credit facility.
12
Interest is due quarterly in arrears on any outstanding borrowings at a customary Eurodollar
rate or the base rate plus the applicable margin. The underlying rate is defined as rates offered
in the interbank Eurodollar market or the higher of the prime lending rate or federal funds rate
plus 0.5%. The applicable margin ranges from 0.0% to 0.30% for base rate loans and from 0.40% to
1.275% for Eurodollar loans. In addition, a facility fee ranging from 0.10% to 0.35% is due
quarterly on all commitments under the credit facility. Both the interest margin and the facility
fee are based on the companys leverage ratio. Outstanding borrowings under the credit facility
were $6.0 million at July 12, 2008. There were no outstanding borrowings under the credit facility
at December 29, 2007. Subsequent to the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2008, the company
borrowed $19.6 million under the credit facility to partially fund the acquisitions of ButterKrust and Holsum that closed
during the third quarter of fiscal 2008 (see Note 15). As of August 15, 2008, the amount
outstanding under the credit facility was $15 million.
The company paid financing costs of $0.3 million during fiscal 2007 in connection with an
amendment of its credit facility. These costs, along with unamortized financing costs on the
companys former credit facility of $0.6 million, were deferred and are being amortized over the
term of the credit facility.
Currently, the companys credit ratings by Standard and Poors and Fitch Ratings are BBB- and
BBB, respectively. During the first quarter of fiscal 2008, Moodys Investor Services revised the
companys credit rating up to Baa2. Changes in the companys credit ratings do not trigger a change
in the companys available borrowings or costs under the credit facility, but could affect future
credit availability.
Included in accounts payable in the condensed consolidated balance sheets are book overdrafts
of $21.2 million and $12.2 million as of July 12, 2008 and December 29, 2007, respectively.
8. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITY
The company maintains a transportation agreement with a thinly capitalized entity. This entity
transports a significant portion of the companys fresh bakery products from the companys
production facilities to outlying distribution centers. The company represents a significant
portion of the entitys revenue. This entity qualifies as a Variable Interest Entity (VIE), but
not a Special Purpose Entity and under FASB Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities, the company is the primary beneficiary. In accordance with FIN 46, the
company consolidates this entity. The VIE has collateral that is sufficient to meet its capital
lease and other debt obligations, and the owner of the VIE personally guarantees the obligations of
the VIE. The VIEs creditors have no recourse against the general credit of the company.
Following is the effect of the VIE during the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended July 12,
2008 and July 14, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TWELVE WEEKS ENDED |
|
|
TWENTY-EIGHT WEEKS ENDED |
|
|
|
JULY 12, 2008 |
|
|
JULY 14, 2007 |
|
|
JULY 12, 2008 |
|
|
JULY 14, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% OF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% OF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% OF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% OF |
|
|
|
VIE |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
VIE |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
VIE |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
VIE |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Assets as of respective quarter ends |
|
$ |
33,421 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
$ |
31,634 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
$ |
33,421 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
$ |
31,634 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
Sales |
|
$ |
2,698 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
$ |
3,247 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
$ |
5,498 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
$ |
6,455 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
Income before income taxes and
minority interest |
|
$ |
1,137 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
$ |
1,016 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
$ |
2,438 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
$ |
2,871 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
The assets consist primarily of $23.0 million and $22.8 million as of July 12, 2008 and July
14, 2007, respectively, of transportation equipment recorded as capital lease obligations.
9. LITIGATION
The company and its subsidiaries from time to time are parties to, or targets of, lawsuits,
claims, investigations and proceedings, including personal injury, commercial, contract,
environmental, antitrust, product liability, health and safety and employment matters, which are
being handled and defended in the ordinary course of business. While the company is unable to
predict the outcome of these matters, it believes, based upon currently available facts, that it is
remote that the ultimate resolution of any such pending matters will have a material adverse effect
on its overall financial condition, results of operations or cash flows in the future. However,
adverse developments could negatively impact earnings in a particular future fiscal period.
13
10. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table calculates basic earnings per common share and diluted earnings per common
share for the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008 and July 14, 2007 (amounts in
thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR THE TWELVE WEEKS ENDED |
|
|
FOR
THE TWENTY-EIGHT WEEKS ENDED |
|
|
|
JULY 12, 2008 |
|
|
JULY 14, 2007 |
|
|
JULY 12, 2008 |
|
|
JULY 14, 2007 |
|
Basic Earnings Per Common Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
23,949 |
|
|
$ |
22,190 |
|
|
$ |
59,732 |
|
|
$ |
50,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
91,724 |
|
|
|
90,761 |
|
|
|
91,710 |
|
|
|
90,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
23,949 |
|
|
$ |
22,190 |
|
|
$ |
59,732 |
|
|
$ |
50,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
91,724 |
|
|
|
90,761 |
|
|
|
91,710 |
|
|
|
90,633 |
|
Add: Shares of common stock assumed issued
upon exercise of stock options and vesting
of restricted stock |
|
|
777 |
|
|
|
1,652 |
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
1,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
92,501 |
|
|
|
92,413 |
|
|
|
92,415 |
|
|
|
92,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options to
purchase 850,200 shares of common stock were not included
in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended July
12, 2008 and stock options to purchase 831,525 shares were not included in the computation
of diluted earnings per share for the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended July 14, 2007 because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
11. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
The company accounts for its stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS 123R,
Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R).
Flowers Foods 2001 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (EPIP) authorizes the compensation
committee of the board of directors to make awards of options to purchase our common stock,
restricted stock, performance stock and performance units and deferred stock. Our officers, key
employees and non-employee directors (whose grants are generally approved by the full board of
directors) are eligible to receive awards under the EPIP. The aggregate number of shares that may
be issued or transferred under the EPIP is 14,625,000 shares. Over the life of the EPIP, the
company has only issued options, restricted stock and deferred stock. Options granted prior to
January 3, 2006 may not be exercised later than ten years after the date of grant, and become
exercisable four years from the date of grant and generally vest at that time or upon death,
disability or retirement of the optionee or upon change in control of Flowers Foods. Options
granted on January 3, 2006 and thereafter may not be exercised later than seven years after the
date of grant, become exercisable three years from the date of grant, generally vest at that time
or upon death, disability or retirement of the optionee or upon change in control of Flowers Foods.
In order to exercise these options the optionees are required to pay the market value calculated as
the average high/low trading value at date of grant for pre-2007 awards and the closing market
price on the date of grant for post-2006 awards. Non-employee director options generally become
exercisable one year from the date of grant and vest at that time. The following is a summary of
stock options, restricted stock, and deferred stock outstanding under the EPIP. Information
relating to the companys stock appreciation rights which are not issued under the EPIP is also
disclosed below.
Stock Options
The following non-qualified stock options (NQSOs) have been granted under the EPIP with
service period remaining. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model was used to estimate the grant
date fair value (amounts in thousands, except price data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant date |
|
1/3/2006 |
|
|
2/5/2007 |
|
|
2/4/2008 |
|
Shares granted |
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
Exercise price |
|
|
18.68 |
|
|
|
19.57 |
|
|
|
24.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting date |
|
1/3/2009 |
|
2/5/2010 |
|
2/4/2011 |
Fair value per share ($)
|
|
|
6.20 |
|
|
|
6.30 |
|
|
|
5.80 |
|
Dividend yield (%)(1)
|
|
|
1.60 |
|
|
|
1.70 |
|
|
|
1.90 |
|
Expected volatility (%)(2)
|
|
|
36.00 |
|
|
|
33.90 |
|
|
|
27.30 |
|
Risk-free interest rate (%)(3)
|
|
|
4.25 |
|
|
|
4.74 |
|
|
|
2.79 |
|
Expected option life (years)(4)
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
Outstanding at July 12, 2008
|
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
826 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
14
|
|
|
1. |
|
Dividend yield estimated yield based on the historical dividend payment for the four most recent dividend payments prior to the grant date. |
|
2. |
|
Expected volatility based on historical volatility over the expected term using daily stock prices. |
|
3. |
|
Risk-free interest rate United States Treasury Constant Maturity rates as of the grant date over the expected term. |
|
4. |
|
Expected option life for the 2006 and 2007 grants the assumption is based on the simplified formula determined in accordance with Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 107. The 2008 grant assumption is based on the simplified formula determined in accordance with Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 110. The company does not have sufficient historical exercise behavior data to reasonably estimate the expected option life and
the terms of the awards issued in 2008 are different from the awards that have fully vested. |
The stock option activity for the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008 pursuant to the EPIP
is set forth below (amounts in thousands, except price data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Contractual Term |
|
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
Outstanding at December 29, 2007 |
|
|
2,417 |
|
|
$ |
15.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
850 |
|
|
$ |
24.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(252 |
) |
|
$ |
9.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at July 12, 2008 |
|
|
3,015 |
|
|
$ |
18.31 |
|
|
|
5.41 |
|
|
$ |
33,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at July 12, 2008 |
|
|
694 |
|
|
$ |
8.58 |
|
|
|
4.68 |
|
|
$ |
14,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 12, 2008, all options outstanding under the EPIP had an average exercise price of
$18.31 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 5.41 years.
During the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008 and July 14, 2007, the company recorded
stock-based compensation expense of $2.3 million and $2.9 million, respectively, relating to NQSOs
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. During the twelve weeks ended July 12, 2008 and July
14, 2007, the company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $1.0 and $1.3 million,
respectively.
As of July 12, 2008, there was $7.3 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related
to outstanding stock options. This cost is expected to be recognized on a straight-line basis over
a weighted-average period of 2.2 years.
Cash received from option exercises for the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008 and July
14, 2007 was $2.4 million and $3.5 million, respectively. The cash tax benefit realized for the tax
deductions from option exercises was $2.0 million and $2.5 million, respectively, for the
twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008 and July 14, 2007. The total intrinsic value of stock
options exercised was $3.7 million and $6.6 million for the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008
and July 14, 2007, respectively.
Restricted Stock
On January 4, 2004, the effective date of his election as Chief Executive Officer, George
Deese was granted 112,500 shares of restricted stock pursuant to the EPIP. The fair value of these
restricted shares on the date of grant was approximately $1.3 million. These shares became fully
vested on January 4, 2008. The company recorded $0.0 million and $0.1 million in compensation
expense during the twelve weeks ended July 12, 2008 and July 14, 2007, respectively, related to
this restricted stock. The company recorded $0.0 million and $0.2 million in compensation expense
during the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008 and July 14, 2007, respectively, related to this
restricted stock.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2006, non-employee directors were granted an aggregate of
38,460 shares of restricted stock. The fair value of these restricted shares on the date of grant
was $0.7 million. These shares fully vested on the first anniversary of the date of grant. The
company recorded $0.1 million in compensation expense during the twelve weeks ended July 14, 2007
and $0.3 million during the twenty-eight weeks ended July 14, 2007 related to this restricted
stock.
Certain key employees have been granted restricted stock. Vesting generally occurs two years
from the date of grant for the 2006 and 2007 awards if, on this date, the companys average return
on invested capital over the vesting period equals or exceeds its weighted average cost of
capital for the same period (the ROI Target). The 2008 awards require the return on invested
capital to
15
exceed the weighted average cost of capital by 2.5% for the same period. Furthermore,
each grant of performance-contingent restricted stock will be adjusted as set forth below:
|
|
if the ROI Target is satisfied, then the performance-contingent restricted stock grant
may be adjusted based on the companys total return to shareholders (Company TSR) percent
rank as compared to the total return to shareholders of the S&P Packaged Food & Meat Index
(S&P TSR) in the manner set forth below: |
|
|
|
If the Company TSR rank is equal to the 50th percentile of the S&P TSR, then no
adjustment; |
|
|
|
If the Company TSR rank is less than the 50th percentile of the S&P TSR, the
grant shall be reduced by 1.3% for each percentile that the Company TSR is less than the
50th percentile of S&P TSR, but in no event shall the reduction exceed 20%; or |
|
|
|
If the Company TSR rank is greater than the 50th percentile of the S&P TSR, the
grant shall be increased by 1.3% for each percentile that Company TSR is greater than
the 50th percentile of S&P TSR, but in no event shall such increase exceed 20%. |
If the grantee dies, becomes disabled or retires, the performance-contingent restricted stock
generally vests immediately. In addition, the performance-contingent restricted stock will
immediately vest at the grant date award level without adjustment if the company undergoes a change
in control. During the vesting period, the grantee is treated as a normal shareholder with respect
to dividend and voting rights on the restricted shares. The fair value estimate was determined
using a Monte Carlo simulation model, which utilizes multiple input variables to determine the
probability of the company achieving the market condition discussed above. Inputs into the model
included the following for the company and comparator companies: (i) total stockholder return from
the beginning of the performance cycle through the measurement date; (ii) volatility; (iii)
risk-free interest rates; and (iv) the correlation of the comparator companies total stockholder
return. The inputs are based on historical capital market data.
The following restricted stock awards have been granted under the EPIP (amounts in thousands,
except price data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant date |
|
1/3/2006 |
|
|
2/5/2007 |
|
|
2/4/2008 |
|
Shares granted |
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
Vesting date |
|
|
1/3/2008 |
|
|
|
2/5/2009 |
|
|
|
2/4/2010 |
|
Fair value per share |
|
$ |
19.44 |
|
|
$ |
20.98 |
|
|
$ |
27.03 |
|
Expense during the twelve weeks ended July 12, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
509 |
|
|
$ |
655 |
|
Expense during the twelve weeks ended July 14, 2007 |
|
$ |
453 |
|
|
$ |
542 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Expense during the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,189 |
|
|
$ |
1,310 |
|
Expense during the twenty-eight weeks ended July 14, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,056 |
|
|
$ |
1,085 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
A summary of the status of the companys nonvested shares as of July 12, 2008, and changes
during the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008, is presented below (amounts in thousands, except
price data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Grant Date Fair Value |
|
Nonvested at December 29, 2007 |
|
|
537 |
|
|
$ |
18.42 |
|
Granted |
|
|
210 |
|
|
$ |
27.03 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(314 |
) |
|
$ |
16.59 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at July 12, 2008 |
|
|
433 |
|
|
$ |
23.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 12, 2008, there was $5.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted by the EPIP. That cost is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.0 years. The fair value of restricted share awards that vested
during fiscal 2008 was $7.1 million on the vesting date.
Stock Appreciation Rights
The company previously awarded stock appreciation rights (rights) to key employees
throughout the company. These rights vest at the end of four years and are payable in cash equal to
the difference between the grant price and the fair market value of the rights on the vesting date.
On July 16, 2007 (the companys third quarter), 448,350 rights granted in 2003 vested. The company
recorded compensation expense for these rights on measurement dates based on changes between the
grant price and an estimated fair value of
16
the rights using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
During the twelve weeks ended July 12, 2008 and July 14, 2007, respectively, the company recorded
expense of $0.0 million and $1.1 million related to these rights. During the twenty-eight weeks
ended July 12, 2008 and July 14, 2007, respectively, the company recorded expense of $0.0 million
and $3.7 million related to these rights.
Prior to 2007, the company allowed non-employee directors to convert their retainers and
committee chairman fees into rights. These rights vest after one year and can be exercised over
nine years. The company records compensation expense for these rights at a measurement date based
on changes between the grant price and an estimated fair value of the rights using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model. During the twelve weeks ended July 12, 2008 and July 14, 2007,
respectively, the company recorded expense of $0.8 million and $0.2 million related to these
rights. During the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008 and July 14, 2007, respectively, the
company recorded expense of $1.2 million and $1.0 million related to these rights.
The fair value of the rights at July 12, 2008 ranged from $14.45 to $25.69. The following
assumptions were used to determine fair value of the rights discussed above using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model at July 12, 2008: dividend yield 2.2%; expected volatility 28.0%; risk-free
interest rate 3.3% and expected life of 1.55 years to 3.95 years.
The rights activity for the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008 is set forth below (amounts
in thousands except price data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Rights |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Contractual Term (Years) |
|
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
Outstanding at December 29, 2007 |
|
|
231 |
|
|
$ |
11.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at July 12, 2008 |
|
|
231 |
|
|
$ |
11.14 |
|
|
|
5.40 |
|
|
$ |
4,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Stock
The company allows non-employee directors to convert their retainers into deferred stock. The
deferred stock has a minimum two year vesting period and will be distributed to the individual
after that time at a designated time selected by the individual at the date of conversion. During
the first quarter of fiscal 2007 and 2008 an aggregate of 20,520 and 22,160 shares, respectively,
were converted. The company records compensation expense for this deferred stock over the two-year
minimum vesting period based on the closing price of the companys common stock on the date of
conversion.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2007 and 2008, non-employee directors were granted an
aggregate of 34,350 and 35,800 shares, respectively, of deferred stock that has a minimum one year
vesting period. The deferred stock will be distributed to the grantee after that time at a
designated time selected by the grantee at the date of grant. Compensation expense is recorded on
this deferred stock over the one year minimum vesting period.
The deferred stock activity for the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008 is set forth below
(amounts in thousands, except price data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Grant Price |
|
|
Contractual Term (Years) |
|
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
Outstanding at December 29, 2007 |
|
|
55 |
|
|
$ |
21.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred stock issued |
|
|
58 |
|
|
$ |
25.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred stock exercised |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
21.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at July 12, 2008 |
|
|
89 |
|
|
$ |
23.53 |
|
|
|
1.37 |
|
|
$ |
516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the companys stock based compensation expense for the twelve
and twenty-eight week periods ended July 12, 2008 and July 14, 2007, respectively (amounts in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR THE TWELVE WEEKS ENDED |
|
|
FOR THE TWENTY-EIGHT WEEKS ENDED |
|
|
|
JULY 12, 2008 |
|
|
JULY 14, 2007 |
|
|
JULY 12, 2008 |
|
|
JULY 14, 2007 |
|
Stock options |
|
$ |
1,047 |
|
|
$ |
1,303 |
|
|
$ |
2,318 |
|
|
$ |
2,930 |
|
Restricted stock |
|
|
1,164 |
|
|
|
1,128 |
|
|
|
2,498 |
|
|
|
2,604 |
|
Stock appreciation rights |
|
|
759 |
|
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
|
1,181 |
|
|
|
4,736 |
|
Deferred stock |
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock based compensation |
|
$ |
3,280 |
|
|
$ |
3,905 |
|
|
$ |
6,678 |
|
|
$ |
10,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
12. POST-RETIREMENT PLANS
On September 29, 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, which requires recognition of the
overfunded or underfunded status of pension and other postretirement benefit plans on the balance
sheet. Under SFAS 158, gains and losses, prior service costs and credits, and any remaining
transition amounts under SFAS 87 and FASB Statement No. 106, Employers Accounting for
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions (SFAS 106) that have not yet been recognized through
net periodic benefit costs will be recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax
benefits, until they are amortized as a component of net periodic cost. SFAS 158 does not change
how pensions and other postretirement benefits are accounted for and reported in the income
statement. Companies will continue to follow the existing guidance in SFAS 87, FASB Statement No.
88, Employers Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for
Termination Benefits and SFAS 106. SFAS 158 was effective for public companies for fiscal years
ending after December 15, 2006. The company adopted the balance sheet recognition provisions of
SFAS 158 at December 30, 2006, the end of its fiscal year 2006. SFAS 158 also requires that
employers measure the benefit obligation and plan assets as of the fiscal year end for fiscal years
ending after December 15, 2008 (the companys fiscal 2008). In fiscal 2006 and earlier, the company
used a September 30 measurement date for its pension and other postretirement benefit plans. The
company eliminated the early measurement date in fiscal 2007 and applied the remeasurement
alternative in accordance with SFAS 158. Under this alternative, postretirement benefit income measured for the three-month period October 1,
2006 to December 31, 2006 (determined using the September 2006 measurement date) was credited to
beginning 2007 retained earnings. As result, the company increased retained earnings $0.7 million,
net of taxes of $0.5 million and increased the postretirement benefit asset and liability by $1.3
million and $0.1 million, respectively. The funded status of the companys postretirement benefit
plans was then remeasured at January 1, 2007, resulting in an adjustment to the balance sheet
asset, liability and accumulated other comprehensive income. As a result, the postretirement
benefit asset was increased $7.4 million and the postretirement benefit liability was decreased
$0.7 million, with an offsetting credit to accumulated other comprehensive income of $5.0 million,
net of taxes of $3.1 million.
The following summarizes the companys balance sheet related pension and other postretirement
benefit plan accounts at July 12, 2008 as compared to accounts at December 29, 2007 (amounts in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF |
|
|
|
JULY 12, |
|
|
DECEMBER 29, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Noncurrent benefit asset |
|
$ |
38,348 |
|
|
$ |
34,471 |
|
Current benefit liability |
|
$ |
403 |
|
|
$ |
403 |
|
Noncurrent benefit liability |
|
$ |
7,036 |
|
|
$ |
6,599 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
$ |
2,735 |
|
|
$ |
2,625 |
|
Defined Benefit Plans
The company has trusteed, noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering certain
employees. The benefits are based on years of service and the employees career earnings. The plans
are funded at amounts deductible for income tax purposes but not less than the minimum funding
required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). As of July 12, 2008, the
assets of the plans included certificates of deposit, marketable equity securities, mutual funds,
corporate and government debt securities, private and public real estate partnerships, other
diversifying strategies and annuity contracts. Effective January 1, 2006, the company curtailed the
defined benefit plan that covers the majority of its workforce. Benefits under this plan were
frozen, and no future benefits will accrue under this plan. The company continues to maintain a
plan that covers a small number of certain union employees.
The net periodic pension income for the companys plans include the following components
(amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR THE TWELVE WEEKS ENDED |
|
|
FOR
THE TWENTY-EIGHT WEEKS ENDED |
|
|
|
JULY 12, 2008 |
|
|
JULY 14, 2007 |
|
|
JULY 12, 2008 |
|
|
JULY 14, 2007 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
158 |
|
|
$ |
140 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
3,920 |
|
|
|
3,770 |
|
|
|
9,146 |
|
|
|
8,796 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(5,649 |
) |
|
|
(5,307 |
) |
|
|
(13,180 |
) |
|
|
(12,383 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net periodic benefit income |
|
$ |
(1,661 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,477 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,876 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,447 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
Post-retirement Benefit Plan
The company provides certain medical and life insurance benefits for eligible retired
employees. The medical plan covers eligible retirees under the active medical plan. The plan
incorporates an up-front deductible, coinsurance payments and retiree contributions at COBRA
premium levels. Eligibility and maximum period of coverage is based on age and length of service.
The life insurance plan offers coverage to a closed group of retirees.
The net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the company includes the following components
(amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR THE TWELVE WEEKS ENDED |
|
|
FOR
THE TWENTY-EIGHT WEEKS ENDED |
|
|
|
JULY 12, 2008 |
|
|
JULY 14, 2007 |
|
|
JULY 12, 2008 |
|
|
JULY 14, 2007 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
206 |
|
|
$ |
163 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
264 |
|
|
$ |
237 |
|
|
$ |
617 |
|
|
$ |
552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401(k) Retirement Savings Plan
The Flowers Foods 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan (the Plan) covers substantially all of the
companys employees who have completed certain service requirements. The cost and contributions for
certain employees who also participate in the defined benefit pension plan is 25% of the first $400 contributed by the employee. Prior to January 1, 2006,
the costs and contributions for employees who do not participate in the defined benefit pension
plan was 2% of compensation and 50% of the employees contributions, up to 6% of compensation.
Effective January 1, 2006, the costs and contributions for employees who do not participate in the
defined benefit pension plan increased to 3% of compensation and 50% of the employees
contributions, up to 6% of compensation. During the twelve weeks ended July 12, 2008 and July 14,
2007, the total cost and contributions were $3.3 million and $3.0 million, respectively. During
the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008 and July 14, 2007, the total cost and contributions were
$8.1 million and $7.8 million, respectively.
13. INCOME TAXES
The companys effective tax rate for the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008 was
35.7 % for both periods. This rate is down slightly from the 2007 annual effective tax rate of
35.9%, due to favorable discrete items recognized during the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12,
2008. The difference in the effective rate and the statutory rate is primarily due to state income
taxes, the non-taxable earnings of the consolidated variable interest entity and the Section 199
qualifying production activities deduction.
During the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008, the companys activity with
respect to its FIN 48 reserve and related interest expense accrual was immaterial. At this time, we
do not anticipate significant changes to the amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits over the
next twelve months.
14. SEGMENT REPORTING
The DSD segment produces fresh and frozen packaged bread and rolls and the warehouse delivery
segment produces frozen bread and rolls and fresh and frozen snack products. The company evaluates
each segments performance based on income or loss before interest and income taxes, excluding
unallocated expenses and charges which the companys management deems to be an overall corporate
cost or a cost not reflective of the segments core operating businesses. During the second quarter
of fiscal 2008, the companys Tucker, Georgia operation was transferred from the DSD segment to the
warehouse delivery segment. Prior period information has been reclassified to reflect this change.
Information regarding the operations in these reportable segments is as follows (amounts in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR THE TWELVE WEEKS ENDED |
|
|
FOR
THE TWENTY-EIGHT WEEKS ENDED |
|
|
|
JULY 12, 2008 |
|
|
JULY 14, 2007 |
|
|
JULY 12, 2008 |
|
|
JULY 14, 2007 |
|
SALES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DSD |
|
$ |
445,065 |
|
|
$ |
389,071 |
|
|
$ |
1,003,139 |
|
|
$ |
880,948 |
|
Warehouse delivery |
|
|
122,921 |
|
|
|
110,434 |
|
|
|
276,736 |
|
|
|
256,817 |
|
Eliminations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales from warehouse delivery to DSD |
|
|
(23,067 |
) |
|
|
(18,867 |
) |
|
|
(54,056 |
) |
|
|
(44,258 |
) |
Sales from DSD to warehouse delivery |
|
|
(4,263 |
) |
|
|
(2,800 |
) |
|
|
(8,456 |
) |
|
|
(5,722 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
540,656 |
|
|
$ |
477,838 |
|
|
$ |
1,217,363 |
|
|
$ |
1,087,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DSD |
|
$ |
12,153 |
|
|
$ |
11,931 |
|
|
$ |
28,111 |
|
|
$ |
27,849 |
|
Warehouse delivery |
|
|
3,656 |
|
|
|
3,216 |
|
|
|
8,378 |
|
|
|
7,473 |
|
Unallocated |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,032 |
|
|
$ |
15,116 |
|
|
$ |
36,945 |
|
|
$ |
35,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR THE TWELVE WEEKS ENDED |
|
|
FOR
THE TWENTY-EIGHT WEEKS ENDED |
|
|
|
JULY 12, 2008 |
|
|
JULY 14, 2007 |
|
|
JULY 12, 2008 |
|
|
JULY 14, 2007 |
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME
TAXES AND MINORITY
INTEREST: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DSD |
|
$ |
36,387 |
|
|
$ |
33,454 |
|
|
$ |
89,779 |
|
|
$ |
78,523 |
|
Warehouse delivery |
|
|
6,461 |
|
|
|
6,782 |
|
|
|
14,720 |
|
|
|
14,961 |
|
Unallocated |
|
|
(6,488 |
) |
|
|
(6,048 |
) |
|
|
(13,990 |
) |
|
|
(14,381 |
) |
Interest income, net |
|
|
2,657 |
|
|
|
1,932 |
|
|
|
6,154 |
|
|
|
3,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
39,017 |
|
|
$ |
36,120 |
|
|
$ |
96,663 |
|
|
$ |
82,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales by product category in each reportable segment are as follows (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the twelve weeks ended July 12, 2008 |
|
|
For
the twelve weeks ended July 14, 2007 |
|
|
|
DSD |
|
|
Warehouse delivery |
|
|
Total |
|
|
DSD |
|
|
Warehouse delivery |
|
|
Total |
|
Branded Retail |
|
$ |
264,527 |
|
|
$ |
27,765 |
|
|
$ |
292,292 |
|
|
$ |
229,517 |
|
|
$ |
22,882 |
|
|
$ |
252,399 |
|
Store Branded Retail |
|
|
63,831 |
|
|
|
13,013 |
|
|
|
76,844 |
|
|
|
54,596 |
|
|
|
10,694 |
|
|
|
65,290 |
|
Foodservice and Other |
|
|
112,444 |
|
|
|
59,076 |
|
|
|
171,520 |
|
|
|
102,158 |
|
|
|
57,991 |
|
|
|
160,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
440,802 |
|
|
$ |
99,854 |
|
|
$ |
540,656 |
|
|
$ |
386,271 |
|
|
$ |
91,567 |
|
|
$ |
477,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008 |
|
|
For the twenty-eight weeks ended July 14, 2007 |
|
|
|
DSD |
|
|
Warehouse delivery |
|
|
Total |
|
|
DSD |
|
|
Warehouse delivery |
|
|
Total |
|
Branded Retail |
|
$ |
594,227 |
|
|
$ |
58,758 |
|
|
$ |
652,985 |
|
|
$ |
517,271 |
|
|
$ |
51,974 |
|
|
$ |
569,245 |
|
Store Branded Retail |
|
|
136,590 |
|
|
|
27,512 |
|
|
|
164,102 |
|
|
|
116,575 |
|
|
|
24,804 |
|
|
|
141,379 |
|
Foodservice and Other |
|
|
263,866 |
|
|
|
136,410 |
|
|
|
400,276 |
|
|
|
241,380 |
|
|
|
135,781 |
|
|
|
377,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
994,683 |
|
|
$ |
222,680 |
|
|
$ |
1,217,363 |
|
|
$ |
875,226 |
|
|
$ |
212,559 |
|
|
$ |
1,087,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On August 1, 2008, the company entered into a Credit Agreement (term loan) with various
lending parties. The term loan provides for borrowings through the maturity date of August 4, 2013
for the purpose of completing the acquisition of ButterKrust and Holsum. The maximum amount
permitted to be outstanding under the term loan is $150 million. The term loan includes certain
customary restrictions, which, among other things, require maintenance of financial covenants and
limit encumbrance of assets and creation of indebtedness. Restrictive financial covenants include
such ratios as a minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum leverage ratio. The company
believes that, given its current cash position, its cash flow from operating activities and its
available credit capacity, it can comply with the current terms of the term loan and can meet
presently foreseeable financial requirements.
Interest is due quarterly in arrears on any outstanding borrowings at a customary Eurodollar
rate or the base rate plus the applicable margin. The underlying rate is defined as the rate
offered in the interbank Eurodollar market or the higher of the prime lending rate or federal funds
rate plus 0.5%. The applicable margin ranges from 0.000% to 1.375% for base rate loans and from
0.875% to 2.375% for Eurodollar loans and is based on the companys leverage ratio. Principal payments
are due quarterly under the term loan beginning on December 31, 2008 at an annual amortization of 10% of the then
outstanding principal balance for the first two years, 15% during the third year, 20% during the
fourth year, and 45% during the fifth year until the maturity date when the balance is due. The
company will also pay legal, accounting and other fees and expenses in connection with the term
loan which will be amortized over the life of the term loan.
20
On August 4, 2008, the company acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of capital stock of C &
G Holdings, Inc. which operates under the name ButterKrust Bakery (ButterKrust). ButterKrust
manufactures fresh breads and rolls in Lakeland, Florida and its products are available throughout
Florida under the Country Hearth, Rich Harvest, and Sunbeam brands as well as store brands. The
purchase price was $90 million in cash including the payoff of certain indebtedness and other
payments. ButterKrust will be included in the companys DSD operating segment in the third quarter
of fiscal 2008.
On August 11, 2008, a wholly owned subsidiary of the company merged with Holsum Holdings, LLC.
(Holsum). Holsum operates two bakeries in the Phoenix, Arizona area and serves customers in
Arizona, New Mexico, southern Nevada and southern California with fresh breads and rolls under the
Holsum, Aunt Hatties, and Roman Meal brands. As a result of the merger, the company expands into
new geographic markets. The purchase price was $150 million including the payoff of certain debt
and other obligations of Holsum. Approximately one half of the net purchase price was paid in cash
and the other half in company common stock. Holsum will be included in the companys DSD operating
segment in the third quarter of fiscal 2008.
On August 13, 2008, the company entered an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $65.0
million to fix the interest rate on the remaining portion of the $150 million term loan secured on
August 1, 2008 to fund the acquisitions of ButterKrust and Holsum. On July 9, 2008, an interest
rate swap with a notional amount of $85.0 million was entered into and is discussed in Note 6 of Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION |
The following discussion of the financial condition and results of operations of the company
as of and for the twelve and twenty-eight week periods ended July 12, 2008 should be read in
conjunction with the companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29,
2007.
The company consists of two business segments: direct-store-delivery (DSD), formerly
referred to as Flowers Foods Bakeries Group and warehouse delivery, formerly referred to as Flowers
Foods Specialty Group. The DSD segment focuses on the production and marketing of bakery products
to customers in the southeastern, southwestern and mid-Atlantic areas of the United States
primarily through its direct store delivery system. The warehouse delivery segment produces snack
cakes for sale to co-pack, retail and vending customers as well as frozen bread, rolls and buns for sale to retail and foodservice customers
primarily through warehouse distribution.
OVERVIEW:
Flowers Foods, Inc. is one of the nations leading producers and marketers of packaged bakery
foods for retail and foodservice customers. The company produces breads, buns, rolls, snack cakes
and pastries that are distributed fresh in the Southeast, Southwest and Mid-Atlantic regions and
frozen to customers nationwide. Our businesses are organized into two reportable segments. The DSD
segment produces fresh and frozen packaged bread and rolls and the warehouse delivery segment
produces frozen bread and rolls, as well as fresh snack products. This organizational structure is
the basis of the operating segment data presented in this report.
We aim to achieve consistent and sustainable growth in sales and earnings by focusing on
improvement in the operating results of our existing businesses and, after detailed analysis
acquiring businesses, such as ButterKrust and Holsum as discussed in Note 15 of Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q, that add value to the company. We believe this consistent and sustainable
growth will build value for our shareholders. In November 2007, the company purchased property in
Bardstown, Kentucky. In January 2008, the company began construction of a bakery facility on this
property that will produce fresh breads and buns for markets in Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio, and
Indiana. Due to weather delays, the company expects that the facility will begin production in the
spring of 2009 rather than the fall of 2008 as reported in the companys Form 10-K for the year
ended December 29, 2007.
Sales are principally affected by pricing, quality, brand recognition, new product
introductions and product line extensions, marketing and service. The company manages these factors
to achieve a sales mix favoring its higher-margin branded products, while using store brand
products to absorb overhead costs and maximize use of production capacity. Sales for the twelve
weeks ended July 12, 2008 increased 13.1% as compared to the twelve weeks ended July 14, 2007.
Contributing to this increase were favorable
21
pricing/mix and volume. Sales for the twenty-eight
weeks ended July 12, 2008 increased 11.9% as compared to the twenty-eight weeks ended July 14,
2007.
For the twelve weeks ended July 12, 2008, diluted net income per share was $0.26 as compared
to $0.24 per share for the twelve weeks ended July 14, 2007, a 8.3% increase. Net income was $23.9
million, a 7.9% increase over $22.2 million reported for the twelve weeks ended July 14, 2007.
For the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008, diluted net income per share was $0.65 as
compared to $0.55, a 18.2% increase. Net income was $59.7 million, a 17.9% increase over $50.7
million reported for the twenty-eight weeks ended July 14, 2007.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP). These principles are numerous and complex. Our significant accounting policies
are summarized in the companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29,
2007. In many instances, the application of GAAP requires management to make estimates or to apply
subjective principles to particular facts and circumstances. A variance in the estimates used or a
variance in the application or interpretation of GAAP could yield a materially different accounting
result. In our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007, we discuss the areas where we
believe that the estimates, judgments or interpretations that we have made, if different, would
have yielded the most significant differences in our financial statements and we urge you to review
that discussion.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS:
Results of operations, expressed as a percentage of sales, for the twelve and twenty-eight
week periods ended July 12, 2008 and July 14, 2007, are set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR THE TWELVE WEEKS ENDED |
|
|
FOR
THE TWENTY-EIGHT WEEKS ENDED |
|
|
|
JULY 12, 2008 |
|
|
JULY 14, 2007 |
|
|
JULY 12, 2008 |
|
|
JULY 14, 2007 |
|
Sales |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
45.70 |
|
|
|
48.74 |
|
|
|
47.13 |
|
|
|
49.26 |
|
Selling, marketing and
administrative expenses |
|
|
36.56 |
|
|
|
38.42 |
|
|
|
36.91 |
|
|
|
38.75 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2.97 |
|
|
|
3.16 |
|
|
|
3.03 |
|
|
|
3.24 |
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on insurance recovery |
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income, net |
|
|
0.49 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
Income before income taxes
and minority interest |
|
|
7.22 |
|
|
|
7.56 |
|
|
|
7.94 |
|
|
|
7.63 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
2.58 |
|
|
|
2.70 |
|
|
|
2.83 |
|
|
|
2.70 |
|
Minority interest in
variable interest entity |
|
|
(0.21 |
) |
|
|
(0.21 |
) |
|
|
(0.20 |
) |
|
|
(0.26 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
4.43 |
% |
|
|
4.65 |
% |
|
|
4.91 |
% |
|
|
4.67 |
% |
CONSOLIDATED AND SEGMENT RESULTS
TWELVE WEEKS ENDED JULY 12, 2008 COMPARED TO TWELVE WEEKS ENDED JULY 14, 2007
Consolidated Sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the twelve weeks ended |
|
|
For the twelve weeks ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 12, 2008 |
|
|
July 14, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
% Increase |
|
|
|
(Amounts in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Branded Retail |
|
$ |
292,292 |
|
|
|
54.1 |
% |
|
$ |
252,399 |
|
|
|
52.8 |
% |
|
|
15.8 |
% |
Store Branded Retail |
|
|
76,844 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
65,290 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
% |
Foodservice and Other |
|
|
171,520 |
|
|
|
31.7 |
|
|
|
160,149 |
|
|
|
33.5 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
540,656 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
477,838 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
13.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
The 13.1% increase in sales was attributable to a favorable pricing/mix of 10.9% and unit
volume increases of 2.2%. The 2.2% increase in volume resulted primarily from expansion markets.
The increase in branded retail sales was due primarily to favorable pricing/mix and increased sales
of brand soft variety and white bread. The companys Natures Own products and its branded white
bread labels were the key components of these sales. The increase in store branded retail sales was
due to favorable pricing/mix and, to a lesser extent, volume increases. The increase in foodservice
and other sales was due to favorable pricing/mix, partially offset by volume declines.
Direct-Store-Delivery Sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the twelve weeks ended |
|
|
For the twelve weeks ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 12, 2008 |
|
|
July 14, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
% Increase |
|
|
|
(Amounts in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Branded Retail |
|
$ |
264,527 |
|
|
|
60.0 |
% |
|
$ |
229,517 |
|
|
|
59.4 |
% |
|
|
15.3 |
% |
Store Branded Retail |
|
|
63,831 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
54,596 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
% |
Foodservice and Other |
|
|
112,444 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
|
|
|
102,158 |
|
|
|
26.5 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
440,802 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
386,271 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
14.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 14.1% increase in sales was attributable to favorable pricing/mix of 12.1% and volume
increases of 2.0%. The increase in branded retail sales was due to favorable pricing/mix and, to a
lesser extent, volume increases. The volume increases were primarily the result of market
expansions. Natures Own products and branded white bread labels were the key components of these
sales. The increase in store branded retail sales was primarily due to favorable pricing/mix and,
to a lesser extent, increased volume. The increase in foodservice and other sales was primarily due
to pricing/mix.
Warehouse Delivery Sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the twelve weeks ended |
|
|
For the twelve weeks ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 12, 2008 |
|
|
July 14, 2007 |
|
|
% Increase |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
(Amounts in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Branded Retail |
|
$ |
27,765 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
% |
|
$ |
22,882 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
% |
|
|
21.3 |
% |
Store Branded Retail |
|
|
13,013 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
10,694 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
% |
Foodservice and Other |
|
|
59,076 |
|
|
|
59.2 |
|
|
|
57,991 |
|
|
|
63.3 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
99,854 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
91,567 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 9.1% increase in sales was attributable to favorable pricing/mix of 6.3% and volume
increases of 2.8%. The increase in branded retail sales was primarily the result of favorable
volume, partially offset by unfavorable pricing/mix. The increase in store branded retail sales was
primarily due to volume. The increase in foodservice and other sales, which include contract
production and vending, was due to favorable pricing/mix, partially offset by unfavorable volume.
Gross Margin (defined as sales less materials, supplies, labor and other production costs,
excluding depreciation, amortization and distributor discounts). Gross margin for the twelve weeks
ended July 12, 2008 was $247.1 million, or 6.1% higher than gross margin reported for the same
period of the prior year of $232.9 million. As a percent of sales, gross margin was 45.7% as
compared to 48.7% for the second quarter of fiscal 2007. This decrease as a percent of sales was
primarily due to significantly higher ingredient costs which were up 34% over the prior year
quarter, partially offset by sales gains and improved manufacturing efficiencies. The significantly
higher ingredient costs were primarily driven by increases in flour costs. Also negatively
impacting gross margin were costs of $1.3 million relating to the sale and closure of a facility in
Atlanta, Georgia.
The DSD segments gross margin decreased to 50.2% of sales for the second quarter ended July
12, 2008, compared to 53.2% of sales for the prior years second quarter. This decrease as a
percent of sales was primarily due to the higher ingredient costs, partially offset by sales gains,
improved manufacturing efficiencies and lower labor costs as a percent of sales. The higher
ingredient costs were driven primarily by higher flour costs.
The warehouse delivery segments gross margin decreased to 25.6% of sales for the second
quarter of fiscal 2008, compared to 29.9% of sales for the same period of fiscal 2007. This
decrease as a percent of sales was primarily a result of the higher ingredient costs, partially
offset by lower labor, packaging, freezer storage, rent costs, and improved manufacturing
efficiencies. Also negatively impacting gross margin were costs of $1.3 million relating to the
sale and closure of a facility in Atlanta, Georgia.
23
Selling, Marketing and Administrative Expenses. For the second quarter of fiscal 2008,
selling, marketing and administrative expenses were $197.7 million, or 36.6% of sales as compared
to $183.6 million, or 38.4% of sales reported for the second quarter of fiscal 2007. This decrease
as a percent of sales was due to sales gains and lower labor, distribution, stock-based
compensation, and advertising expense as a percent of sales, partially offset by higher distributor
discounts and fuel costs. Sales gains resulted in the increase in distributor discounts. The $0.6
million decrease in stock-based compensation was primarily the result of the companys higher stock
appreciation rights expense during the second quarter of fiscal 2007, partially offset by the
issuance of new stock option and restricted stock awards during the first quarter of fiscal 2008.
See Note 11 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for further
information regarding the companys stock-based compensation.
The DSD segments selling, marketing and administrative expenses include discounts paid to the
independent distributors utilized in our DSD system. The DSD segments selling, marketing and
administrative expenses were $173.6 million, or 39.4% of sales during the second quarter of fiscal
2008, as compared to $160.2 million, or 41.5% of sales during the same period of fiscal 2007. The
decrease as a percent of sales was primarily due to sales gains, lower labor, stock-based
compensation and advertising expense as a percent of sales, partially offset by significantly
higher distributor discounts, and higher fuel costs.
The warehouse delivery segments selling, marketing and administrative expenses were $17.8
million, or 17.8% of sales during the second quarter of fiscal 2008, as compared to $17.4 million,
or 18.9% of sales during the second quarter of fiscal 2007. This decrease as a percent of sales was
primarily attributable to lower labor, distribution and freezer storage costs, partially offset by
higher rent costs.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense was $16.0 million for the
second quarter of fiscal 2008, an increase of 6.1% from the second quarter of fiscal 2007, which
was $15.1 million.
The DSD segments depreciation and amortization expense increased to $12.2 million for the
second quarter of fiscal 2008 from $11.9 million in the same period of fiscal 2007. This increase
was primarily the result of increased depreciation expense due to capital expenditures placed in
service subsequent to the second quarter of fiscal 2007.
The warehouse delivery segments depreciation and amortization expense increased to $3.7
million for the second quarter of fiscal 2008 from $3.2 million in the same period of fiscal 2007.
This increase was primarily the result of increased depreciation expense due to capital
expenditures placed in service subsequent to the second quarter of fiscal 2007.
Gain on sale of assets. During the second quarter of fiscal 2008 the company completed the
sale and closure of a plant facility in Atlanta, Georgia resulting in a gain of $2.3 million. The
company incurred $1.3 million of cost of goods sold expenses primarily for employee severance,
obsolete inventory, and equipment relocation costs. An additional $0.3 million is included in
selling, marketing and administrative expenses.
Gain on insurance recovery. During fiscal 2007, the company recorded a gain related to
insurance proceeds on a distribution facility destroyed by fire at its Lynchburg, Virginia
location. An additional $0.7 million related to insurance proceeds in excess of the net book value
was received during the second quarter ended July 12, 2008. The receipt of these proceeds closed
the claim.
Income from operations. Income from operations for the second quarter of fiscal 2008 was $36.4
million, an increase of $2.2 million from the $34.2 million reported for the second quarter of
fiscal 2007.
The improvement was primarily the result of improvements in the operating results of the DSD
segment of $2.9 million, partially offset by a decrease in the warehouse delivery segment of $0.3
million and an increase in unallocated corporate expenses of $0.4 million. The increase in the DSD
segment was primarily attributable to higher sales, and improved manufacturing efficiencies. The
increase in unallocated corporate expenses was primarily due to depreciation. The decrease in the
warehouse delivery segment was primarily a result of higher commodity prices and secondarily to
lower sales volume in foodservice.
Net Interest Income. For the second quarter of fiscal 2008, net interest income was $2.7
million, an increase of $0.8 million from the second quarter of fiscal 2007, which was $1.9
million. The increase was related to lower interest expense due to lower average debt outstanding
and increased interest income related to the sale of new territories to independent distributors.
Income Taxes. The effective tax rate for the second quarter of fiscal 2008 was 35.7% compared
to 35.8% in the second quarter of the prior year. The difference in the effective rate and the
statutory rate is primarily due to state income taxes, the non-taxable earnings of the consolidated
variable interest entity and the Section 199 qualifying production activities deduction.
24
Minority
Interest. Minority interest represents all the earnings of the companys VIE under the
consolidation provisions of FIN 46. All the earnings of
the VIE are eliminated through minority interest due to the company not having any equity ownership
in the VIE. The company is required to consolidate this VIE due to the VIE being capitalized with a
less than substantive amount of legal form capital investment and the company accounting for a
significant portion of the VIEs revenues. See Note 8 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements of this Form 10-Q for further information regarding the companys VIE.
TWENTY-EIGHT WEEKS ENDED JULY 12, 2008 COMPARED TO TWENTY-EIGHT WEEKS ENDED JULY 14, 2007
Consolidated Sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the twenty-eight weeks ended |
|
|
For the twenty-eight weeks ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 12, 2008 |
|
|
July 14, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
% Increase |
|
|
|
(Amounts
in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts
in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Branded Retail |
|
$ |
652,985 |
|
|
|
53.6 |
% |
|
$ |
569,245 |
|
|
|
52.3 |
% |
|
|
14.7 |
% |
Store Branded Retail |
|
|
164,102 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
141,379 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
% |
Foodservice and Other |
|
|
400,276 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
|
|
|
377,161 |
|
|
|
34.7 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,217,363 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,087,785 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 11.9% increase in sales was attributable to a favorable pricing/mix of 10.2% and unit
volume increases of 1.7%. The 1.7% increase in volume resulted primarily from expansion markets.
The increase in branded retail sales was due primarily to increases in pricing/mix and, to a lesser
extent, volume increases. Brand soft variety and white bread were the key components of these
sales. The companys Natures Own products and its branded white bread labels were the key
components of these sales. The increase in store branded retail sales was due to favorable
pricing/mix and, to a lesser extent, volume increases. The increase in foodservice and other sales
was due to favorable pricing/mix, partially offset by volume declines.
Direct-Store-Delivery Sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the twenty-eight weeks ended |
|
|
For the twenty-eight weeks ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 12, 2008 |
|
|
July 14, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
% Increase |
|
|
|
(Amounts
in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts
in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Branded Retail |
|
$ |
594,227 |
|
|
|
59.7 |
% |
|
$ |
517,271 |
|
|
|
59.1 |
% |
|
|
14.9 |
% |
Store Branded Retail |
|
|
136,590 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
116,575 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
% |
Foodservice and Other |
|
|
263,866 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
241,380 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
994,683 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
875,226 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 13.6% increase in sales was attributable to favorable pricing/mix of 11.2% and volume
increases of 2.4%. The increase in branded retail sales was due to favorable pricing/mix and, to a
lesser extent, volume increases. The volume increases were primarily the result of market
expansions. Natures Own products and branded white bread labels were the key components of these
sales. The increase in store branded retail sales was primarily due to favorable pricing/mix and,
to a lesser extent, increased volume. The increase in foodservice and other sales was primarily due
to pricing/mix.
Warehouse Delivery Sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the twenty-eight weeks ended |
|
|
For the twenty-eight weeks ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 12, 2008 |
|
|
July 14, 2007 |
|
|
% Increase |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
(Amounts
in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts
in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Branded Retail |
|
$ |
58,758 |
|
|
|
26.4 |
% |
|
$ |
51,974 |
|
|
|
24.5 |
% |
|
|
13.1 |
% |
Store Branded Retail |
|
|
27,512 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
24,804 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
% |
Foodservice and Other |
|
|
136,410 |
|
|
|
61.2 |
|
|
|
135,781 |
|
|
|
63.8 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
222,680 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
212,559 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 4.8% increase in sales was attributable to favorable pricing/mix of 4.5% and increased
volume of 0.3%. The increase in branded retail sales was primarily the result of favorable
pricing/mix. The increase in store branded retail sales was primarily due to volume, partially
offset by unfavorable pricing/mix. The increase in foodservice and other sales, which include
contract production and vending, was due to favorable pricing/mix.
25
Gross Margin (defined as sales less materials, supplies, labor and other production costs,
excluding depreciation, amortization and distributor discounts). Gross margin for the twenty-eight
weeks ended July 12, 2008 was $573.8 million, or 7.1% higher than gross margin reported for the
same period of the prior year of $535.9 million. As a percent of sales, gross margin was 47.1% as
compared to 49.3% for the prior year. This decrease as a percent of sales was
primarily due to significantly higher ingredient costs, which were up 31% over the prior year, and
$1.7 million of costs related to the closure of the Atlanta, Georgia Snack facility, partially
offset by sales gains, better stales control, and improved manufacturing efficiencies. The
significantly higher ingredient costs were primarily driven by increases in flour costs.
The DSD segments gross margin decreased to 51.6% of sales for the twenty-eight weeks ended
July 12, 2008, compared to 54.0% of sales for the same period in the prior year. This decrease as a
percent of sales was primarily due to the higher ingredient costs, partially offset by sales gains
and better stales control, improved manufacturing efficiencies and lower labor costs as a percent
of sales. The higher ingredient costs were driven primarily by higher flour costs.
The warehouse delivery segments gross margin decreased to 27.4% of sales for the twenty-eight
weeks ended July 12, 2008, compared to 29.9% of sales for the same period of fiscal 2007. This
decrease as a percent of sales was primarily a result of the higher ingredient costs, partially
offset by improved manufacturing efficiencies and lower labor, packaging, freezer storage and rent
costs as a percent of sales. Also negatively impacting gross margin were costs of $1.7 million relating to the sale and
closure of the plant facility in Atlanta, Georgia as discussed above.
Selling, Marketing and Administrative Expenses. For the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12,
2008, selling, marketing and administrative expenses were $449.3 million, or 36.9% of sales as
compared to $421.6 million, or 38.8% of sales reported for the same period of fiscal 2007. This
decrease as a percent of sales was due to sales gains and lower labor, distribution, and
advertising expense as a percent of sales, partially offset by higher distributor discounts and
higher fuel costs. Sales gains and the sale of certain routes to independent distributors resulted
in the increase in distributor discounts. The $3.8 million decrease in stock-based compensation was
the result of the companys higher stock appreciation rights expense during the first two quarters
of fiscal 2007, partially offset by the issuance of new stock option and restricted stock awards
during the first quarter of fiscal 2008. See Note 11 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements of this Form 10-Q for further information regarding the companys stock-based
compensation.
The DSD segments selling, marketing and administrative expenses include discounts paid to the
independent distributors utilized in our DSD system. The DSD segments selling, marketing and
administrative expenses were $395.6 million, or 39.8% of sales during the twenty-eight weeks ended
July 12, 2008, as compared to $365.9 million, or 41.8% of sales during the same period of fiscal
2007. The decrease as a percent of sales was primarily due to sales gains, lower labor, stock-based
compensation and advertising expense as a percent of sales, partially offset by significantly
higher distributor discounts and rising fuel costs.
The warehouse delivery segments selling, marketing and administrative expenses were $40.2
million, or 18.0% of sales during the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008, as compared to $41.2
million, or 19.4% of sales during the same period of fiscal 2007. This decrease as a percent of
sales was primarily attributable to lower labor, advertising and distribution costs as a percent of
sales.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense was $36.9 million for the
twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008, an increase of 4.9% from the same period of fiscal 2007,
which was $35.2 million.
The DSD segments depreciation and amortization expense increased to $28.1 million for the
twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008 from $27.8 million in the same period of fiscal 2007. This
increase was primarily the result of increased depreciation expense due to capital expenditures
placed in service subsequent to the second quarter of fiscal 2007.
The warehouse delivery segments depreciation and amortization expense increased to $8.4
million for the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008 from $7.5 million in the same period of
fiscal 2007. This increase was primarily the result of increased depreciation expense due to
capital expenditures placed in service subsequent to the second quarter of fiscal 2007.
Gain on sale of assets. During the second quarter the company completed the sale and closure
of a plant facility in Atlanta, Georgia resulting in a gain of $2.3 million. The company incurred
$1.7 million of cost of goods sold expenses primarily for employee severance, obsolete inventory,
and equipment relocation costs. Costs of $0.3 million is included in selling, marketing and
administrative expenses relating to the sale and closure.
26
Gain on insurance recovery. During fiscal 2007, the company recorded a gain related to
insurance proceeds on a distribution facility destroyed by fire at its Lynchburg, Virginia
location. An additional $0.7 million related to insurance proceeds in excess of the net book value
was received during the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008. The payment closed the claim.
Income from operations. Income from operations for the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008
was $90.5 million, an increase of $11.4 million from the $79.1 million reported for the same period
of fiscal 2007.
The improvement was primarily the result of improvements in the operating results of the DSD
segment of $11.2 million and a decrease in unallocated corporate expenses of $0.4 million,
partially offset by a decrease in the warehouse delivery segment of $0.2 million. The increase in
the DSD segment was primarily attributable to higher sales, better stales control and improved
manufacturing efficiencies. The decrease in unallocated corporate expenses was primarily due to
lower stock based compensation discussed above. The decrease in the warehouse delivery segment was
primarily a result of higher commodity prices and secondarily to lower sales volume in foodservice.
Net Interest Income. For the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008, net interest income was
$6.2 million, an increase of $2.3 million from the same period of fiscal 2007, which was $3.9
million. The increase was related to lower interest expense due to lower average debt outstanding
and increased interest income related to the sale of new territories to independent distributors.
Income Taxes. The effective tax rate for the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008 was 35.7%
compared to 35.5% in the same period of the prior year. The difference in the effective rate and
the statutory rate is primarily due to state income taxes, the non-taxable earnings of the
consolidated variable interest entity and the Section 199 qualifying production activities
deduction.
Minority Interest. Minority interest represents all
the earnings of the companys VIE under the consolidation provisions of FIN 46. All the earnings of
the VIE are eliminated through minority interest due to the company not having any equity ownership
in the VIE. The company is required to consolidate this VIE due to the VIE being capitalized with a
less than substantive amount of legal form capital investment and the company accounting for a
significant portion of the VIEs revenues. See Note 8 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements of this Form 10-Q for further information regarding the companys VIE.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES:
Liquidity represents our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operating activities
to meet our obligations and commitments as well as our ability to obtain appropriate financing and
convert into cash those assets that are no longer required to meet existing strategic and financing
objectives. Therefore, liquidity cannot be considered separately from capital resources that
consist primarily of current and potentially available funds for use in achieving long-range
business objectives. Currently, the companys liquidity needs arise primarily from working capital
requirements, capital expenditures and stock repurchases. The companys strategy for use of its
cash flow includes paying dividends to shareholders, making acquisitions, growing internally and
repurchasing shares of its common stock when appropriate.
Cash Flows
Flowers Foods cash and cash equivalents decreased to $19.5 million at July 12, 2008 from
$20.0 million at December 29, 2007. The decrease resulted from $56.1 million provided by operating
activities, offset by $41.7 million and $14.8 million disbursed for investing activities and
financing activities, respectively.
Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities. Net cash of $56.1 million provided by operating
activities during the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008 consisted primarily of $59.7 million
in net income, adjusted for the following non-cash items (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
36,945 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
6,678 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(2,232 |
) |
Provision for inventory obsolescence |
|
|
492 |
|
Allowances for accounts receivable |
|
|
901 |
|
Minority interest in variable interest entity |
|
|
2,438 |
|
Other |
|
|
(2,467 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
42,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash disbursed for working capital and other activities was $46.4 million.
27
Cash Flows Disbursed for Investing Activities. Net cash disbursed for investing activities
during the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008 of $41.7 million consisted primarily of capital
expenditures of $42.0 million. Capital expenditures in the DSD segment and the warehouse delivery
segment were $33.2 million and $7.7 million, respectively. The company estimates capital
expenditures of approximately $95.0 million to $100.0 million during fiscal 2008. The company also
leases certain production machinery and equipment through various operating leases.
Cash Flows Disbursed for Financing Activities. Net cash disbursed for financing activities of
$14.8 million during the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008 consisted primarily of dividends
paid of $25.4 million, stock repurchases of $5.8 million, partially offset by debt proceeds of $3.2
million and proceeds of $2.4 million from the exercise of stock options.
Credit Facility
The company has a five-year, $250.0 million unsecured revolving loan facility (the credit
facility) that expires October 5, 2012. The company may request to increase its borrowings under
the credit facility up to an aggregate of $350.0 million upon the satisfaction of certain
conditions. Proceeds from the credit facility may be used for working capital and general corporate
purposes, including acquisition financing, refinancing of indebtedness and share repurchases. The
credit facility includes certain customary restrictions, which, among other things, require
maintenance of financial covenants and limit encumbrance of assets and creation of indebtedness.
Restrictive financial covenants include such ratios as a minimum interest coverage ratio and a
maximum leverage ratio. The company believes that, given its current cash position, its cash flow
from operating activities and its available credit capacity, it can comply with the current terms
of the credit facility and can meet presently foreseeable financial requirements. As of July 12,
2008 and December 29, 2007, the company was in compliance with all restrictive financial covenants
under its credit facility.
Interest is due quarterly in arrears on any outstanding borrowings at a customary Eurodollar
rate or the base rate plus the applicable margin. The underlying rate is defined as rates offered
in the interbank Eurodollar market or the higher of the prime lending rate or federal funds rate
plus 0.5%. The applicable margin ranges from 0.00% to 0.30% for base rate loans and from 0.40% to
1.275% for Eurodollar loans. In addition, a facility fee ranging from 0.10% to 0.35% is due
quarterly on all commitments under the credit facility. Both the interest margin and the facility
fee are based on the companys leverage ratio. There were $6.0 million in outstanding borrowings
under the credit facility at July 12, 2008 and no outstanding borrowings under the credit facility
at December 29, 2007. Subsequent to the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2008, the company
borrowed $19.6 million under the credit facility to partially fund the acquisitions of ButterKrust and Holsum that closed
during the third quarter of fiscal 2008. As of August 15, 2008 the amount outstanding under the
credit facility was $15 million.
The company paid financing costs of $0.3 million during fiscal 2007 in connection with an
amendment of its credit facility. These costs, along with unamortized financing costs on the
companys former credit facility of $0.6 million, were deferred and are being amortized over the
term of the credit facility.
Currently, the companys credit ratings by Standard and Poors and Fitch Ratings are BBB- and
BBB, respectively. During the first quarter of fiscal 2008, Moodys Investor Services revised the
companys credit rating up to Baa2. Changes in the companys credit ratings do not trigger a change
in the companys available borrowings or costs under the credit facility, but could affect future
credit availability.
On August 1, 2008, the company entered into a Credit Agreement (term loan) with various
lending parties. The term loan provides for borrowings through the maturity date of August 4, 2013
for the purpose of completing acquisitions. The maximum amount permitted to be outstanding under
the term loan is $150 million. The term loan includes certain customary restrictions, which, among
other things, require maintenance of financial covenants and limit encumbrance of assets and
creation of indebtedness. Restrictive financial covenants include such ratios as a minimum
interest coverage ratio and a maximum leverage ratio. The company believes that, given its current
cash position, its cash flow from operating activities and its available credit capacity, it can
comply with the current terms of the term loan and can meet presently foreseeable financial
requirements. As of August 15, 2008, the amount outstanding under the term loan was $150 million.
Interest is due quarterly in arrears on any outstanding borrowings at a customary Eurodollar
rate or the base rate plus the applicable margin. The underlying rate is defined as the rate
offered in the interbank Eurodollar market or the higher of the prime lending rate or federal funds
rate plus 0.5%. The applicable margin ranges from 0.0% to 1.375% for base rate loans and from
0.875% to 2.375% for Eurodollar loans and is based on the companys leverage ratio. Principal
payments are due quarterly under the term loan beginning on December 31, 2008 at an annual amortization of 10% of
the then outstanding principal balance for the first two years, 15% during the third year, 20%
during the
28
fourth year, and 45% during the fifth year until the maturity date when the balance is
due. The company will also pay legal, accounting and other fees and expenses in connection with
the term loan, which will be amortized over the life of the term loan.
Uses of Cash
On February 8, 2008, the board of directors declared a dividend of $0.125 per share on the
companys common stock that was paid on March 7, 2008 to shareholders of record on February 22,
2008. This dividend payment was $11.6 million.
On May 30, 2008, the board of directors declared a dividend of $0.15 per share on the
companys common stock that was paid on June 27, 2008 to shareholders of record on June 13, 2008.
This dividend payment was $13.8 million.
On December 19, 2002, the board of directors approved a plan that authorized stock repurchases
of up to 16.9 million shares of the companys common stock. On November 18, 2005, the board of
directors further increased the number of authorized shares to 22.9 million shares. On February 8,
2008, the board of directors increased the number of authorized shares to 30.0 million shares.
Under the plan, the company may repurchase its common stock in open market or privately negotiated
transactions at such times and at such prices as determined to be in the companys best interest.
These purchases may be commenced or suspended without prior notice depending on then-existing
business or market conditions and other factors. During the twenty-eight weeks ended July 12, 2008,
256,248 shares, at a cost of $5.8 million, of the companys common stock were purchased under the
plan. From the inception of the plan through July 12, 2008, 19.4 million shares, at a cost of
$286.2 million, have been purchased under the plan.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2008, the company paid $21.9 million in performance-based
cash awards under the companys bonus plan.
On June 23, 2008, the company announced it has entered into a definitive merger agreement with
Holsum Bakery, Inc. The acquisition was completed on August 11, 2008. Consideration was paid in
cash and company stock for approximately $150 million of which 50% is in cash and 50% in company
stock, less certain obligations of Holsum Bakery, Inc.
On June 26, 2008, the company announced it executed a definitive agreement to acquire
ButterKrust Bakery. The acquisition was completed on August 4, 2008. Consideration was paid in
cash for $90 million, less certain indebtedness and other payments.
On August 1, 2008, the company secured a term loan for $150 million for a portion of the cash
consideration for the acquisitions of ButterKrust Bakery and Holsum Bakery, Inc.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS:
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157).
SFAS No. 157 establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to U.S. GAAP requiring
use of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about
such fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial assets and financial
liabilities for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The implementation of SFAS No. 157
for financial assets and financial liabilities, effective January 1, 2008, did not have a material
impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations. Please refer to Note 5,
Derivative Financial Instruments for a detailed discussion.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS
No. 141R). SFAS No. 141R provides revised guidance on how acquirors recognize and measure the
consideration transferred, identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, noncontrolling
interests, and goodwill acquired in a business combination. SFAS No. 141R also expands required
disclosures surrounding the nature and financial effects of business combinations. SFAS No. 141R is
effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company
is currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 141R on its consolidated financial position and
results of operations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements (SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160 establishes requirements for ownership interests
in subsidiaries held by parties other than the company (sometimes called minority interests) be
clearly identified, presented, and disclosed in the consolidated statement of financial position
within equity, but separate from the parents equity. All changes in the parents ownership
interests are required to be accounted for consistently as equity transactions and any
noncontrolling equity investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries must be measured initially at fair
value. SFAS No. 160 is effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2008.
29
However, presentation and disclosure requirements must be retrospectively applied to
comparative financial statements. The company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 160 on
its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 expands
quarterly disclosure requirements in SFAS No. 133 about an entitys derivative instruments and
hedging activities. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008.
The company is currently evaluating the requirements of SFAS No. 161. The adoption of SFAS No. 161
is not expected to have an impact on the companys financial position, results of operations or
cash flows as the pronouncement addresses disclosure requirements only.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (SFAS 162). SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework
for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of
nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles. SFAS 162 is effective 60 days following the Securities and Exchange Commissions
approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning
of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. We do not
anticipate that the adoption of SFAS 162 will materially impact the company.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF No. 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in
Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities. The FSP addresses whether
instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to
vesting and therefore need to be included in the earnings allocation in calculating earnings per
share under the two-class method described in SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share. The FSP requires
companies to treat unvested share-based payment awards that have non-forfeitable rights to dividend
or dividend equivalents as a separate class of securities in calculating earnings per share. The
FSP is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008; earlier application is not
permitted. The company does not expect adoption of FSP EITF No. 03-6-1 to have a material effect on
its results of operations or earnings per share.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The company uses derivative financial instruments as part of an overall strategy to manage
market risk. The company uses forward, futures, swap and option contracts to hedge existing or
future exposure to changes in interest rates and commodity prices. The company does not enter into
these derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. If actual market
conditions are less favorable than those anticipated, raw material prices could increase
significantly, adversely affecting the margins from the sale of our products.
COMMODITY PRICE RISK
The company enters into commodity forward, futures and option contracts and swap agreements
for wheat and, to a lesser extent, other commodities in an effort to provide a predictable and
consistent commodity price and thereby reduce the impact of market volatility in its raw material
and packaging prices. As of July 12, 2008, the companys hedge portfolio contained commodity
derivatives with a fair value of $13.9 million.
A sensitivity analysis has been prepared to quantify the companys potential exposure to
commodity price risk with respect to its derivative portfolio. Based on the companys derivative
portfolio as of July 12, 2008, a hypothetical ten percent increase (decrease) in commodity prices
would increase (decrease) the fair value of the derivative portfolio by $23.1 million. The analysis
disregards changes in the exposures inherent in the underlying hedged items; however, the company
expects that any increase (decrease) in fair value of the portfolio would be substantially offset
by increases (decreases) in raw material and packaging prices.
INTEREST RATE RISK
On July 9, 2008, the company entered an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $85.0
million to fix the interest rate on a portion of the $150 million term loan that is being secured
to fund the acquisition of ButterKrust Bakery and Holsum Bakery, Inc. As of July 12, 2008, the
fair value of this interest rate swap was $(0.1) million.
A sensitivity analysis has been prepared to quantify the companys potential exposure to
interest rate risk with respect to the interest rate swap. As of July 12, 2008, a hypothetical ten
percent increase (decrease) in interest rates would increase (decrease) the fair value of the
interest rate swap by $1.0 million. The analysis disregards changes in the exposures inherent in
the underlying debt;
30
however, the company expects that any increase (decrease) in payments under
the interest rate swap would be substantially offset by increases (decreases) in interest expense.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Managements Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have established and maintain a system of disclosure controls and procedures that are
designed to ensure that material information relating to the company, which is required to be
timely disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the Exchange Act), is accumulated and communicated to management in a timely fashion
and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SECs
rules and forms. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) was performed as of
the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. This evaluation was performed under the
supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer
(CEO), Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and Chief Accounting Officer (CAO). Based upon that
evaluation, our CEO, CFO and CAO have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
our fiscal quarter ended July 12, 2008 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The company and its subsidiaries from time to time are parties to, or targets of, lawsuits,
claims, investigations and proceedings, including personal injury, commercial, contract,
environmental, antitrust, product liability, health and safety and employment matters, which are
being handled and defended in the ordinary course of business. While the company is unable to
predict the outcome of these matters, it believes, based upon currently available facts, that it is
remote that the ultimate resolution of any such pending matters will have a material adverse effect
on its overall financial condition, results of operations or cash flows in the future. However,
adverse developments could negatively impact earnings in a particular future fiscal period.
The companys facilities are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations
regarding the discharge of material into the environment and the protection of the environment in
other ways. The company is not a party to any material proceedings arising under these regulations.
The company believes that compliance with existing environmental laws and regulations will not
materially affect the consolidated financial condition or the competitive position of the company.
The company is currently in substantial compliance with all material environmental regulations
affecting the company and its properties.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Please refer to Part I, Item 1A., Risk Factors, in the companys Form 10-K for the year ended
December 29, 2007 for information regarding factors that could affect the companys results of
operations, financial condition and liquidity. There have been no changes to our risk factors
during the second quarter of fiscal 2008.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
On December 19, 2002 our board of directors approved a plan that authorized stock repurchases
of up to 16.9 million shares of the companys common stock. On November 18, 2005, the board of
directors increased the number of authorized shares to 22.9 million shares. On February 8, 2008,
the board of directors further increased the number of authorized shares to 30.0 million shares.
Under the plan, the company may repurchase its common stock in open market or privately negotiated
transactions at such times and at such prices as determined to be in the companys best interest.
These purchases may be commenced or suspended without prior notice
31
depending on then-existing
business or market conditions and other factors. The company did not repurchase any of its
common stock under the repurchase plan during the second quarter of fiscal 2008.
Certain of our employees who participate in the Companys 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan were
inadvertently permitted to purchase in the open market approximately 658,000 shares of the
Companys common stock that were not registered for purchase by the Plan utilizing a registration
statement on Form S-8 under the Securities Act of 1933 from July 2005 through June 2008. All the
shares were purchased by the trustee of our 401(k) Plan on behalf of participants through open
market purchases and the Company received no proceeds from these transactions. In such situations,
a number of remedies may be available to regulatory authorities and the employees who purchased the
common stock, including, without limitation, a right of rescission and other damages that could be
imposed by regulatory authorities. Pursuant to the rescissionary rights, employees may be entitled
to return their shares to the Company and receive back from us the full price they paid, plus
interest. The rescissionary rights lapse on various dates as prescribed in the federal securities
laws. Based on our current stock price, we believe that our current potential liability for
rescission claims is not material to our consolidated financial balance sheet, statements of income
or cash flows; however, our potential liability could become material in the future if our stock
price were to fall below participants acquisition prices for their interest in our common stock.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
The companys Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on May 30, 2008 in Thomasville, Georgia
for the following purposes and with the following voting results:
(1) To elect four nominees as directors of the company to serve for a term of three years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class I
Directors: |
|
For |
|
Withheld |
|
Broker-Non Votes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benjamin H. Griswold, IV |
|
|
69,226,918 |
|
|
|
18,486,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph L. Lanier, Jr. |
|
|
69,211,217 |
|
|
|
18,502,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
Jackie M. Ward |
|
|
67,860,209 |
|
|
|
19,853,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
C. Martin Wood III |
|
|
69,228,019 |
|
|
|
18,485,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
(2) To approve an amendment to the companys Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase
the number of authorized shares of common stock to 500,000,000.
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
|
52,309,755 |
|
Against |
|
|
34,239,499 |
|
Abstain |
|
|
151,691 |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
|
|
0 |
|
(3) To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as the independent
registered public accounting firm for Flowers Foods for the fiscal year ending January 3, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
|
84,826,760 |
|
Against |
|
|
1,797,359 |
|
Abstain |
|
|
76,826 |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
|
|
0 |
|
Director-nominees received a plurality of votes cast in the election of directors and were
elected to serve until 2011. Proposal 2 received the affirmative vote of a majority of the
outstanding shares of common stock and passed and Proposal 3 received a majority of votes cast and
passed.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibits filed as part of this report are listed in the Exhibit Index attached hereto.
32
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FLOWERS FOODS, INC.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ GEORGE E. DEESE
|
|
|
|
Name: |
George E. Deese |
|
|
|
Title: |
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ R. STEVE KINSEY
|
|
|
|
Name: |
R. Steve Kinsey |
|
|
|
Title: |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ KARYL H. LAUDER
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Karyl H. Lauder |
|
|
|
Title: |
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer |
|
|
Date: August 21, 2008
33
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
No. |
|
|
|
Name of Exhibit |
2.1
|
|
|
|
Distribution Agreement by and between Flowers Industries, Inc. and Flowers Foods, Inc., dated as of
October 26, 2000 (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Registration Statement on Form 10,
dated February 9, 2001, File No. 1-16247). |
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Distribution Agreement, dated as of March 12, 2001, between Flowers Industries,
Inc. and Flowers Foods, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Annual Report on Form
10-K, dated March 30, 2001, File No. 1-16247). |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation of Flowers Foods, Inc. as amended on June 1, 2007 (Incorporated
by reference to Flowers Foods Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, dated August 23, 2007, File No.
1-16247). |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Flowers Foods, Inc. as amended on February 8, 2008 (Incorporated by
reference to Flowers Foods Current Report on Form 8-K/A dated February 25, 2008, File No.
1-16247). |
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
Articles of Amendment to the Restated Articles of Incorporation of Flowers Foods, Inc.
(Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 2, 2008, File
No. 1-16247). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
Share Certificate of Common Stock of Flowers Foods, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Flowers
Foods Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated March 30, 2001, File No. 1-16247). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
Rights Agreement between Flowers Foods, Inc. and First Union National Bank, as Rights Agent, dated
March 23, 2001 (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated March
30, 2001, File No. 1-16247). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1, dated November 15, 2002, to Rights Agreement between Flowers Foods, Inc. and
Wachovia Bank, N.A. (as successor in interest to First Union National Bank), as rights agent, dated
March 23, 2001. (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Registration Statement on Form 8-A,
dated November 18, 2002, File No. 1-16247). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
Flowers Foods, Inc. Retirement Plan No. 1 (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Annual
Report on Form 10-K, dated March 30, 2001, File No. 1-16247). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
Flowers Foods, Inc. 2001 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of
February 11, 2005 (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A,
dated April 29, 2005, File No. 1-16247). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
Flowers Foods, Inc. Stock Appreciation Rights Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods
Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated March 27, 2002, File No. 1-16247). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
Flowers Foods, Inc. Annual Executive Bonus Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods
Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated March 27, 2002, File No. 1-16247). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to the Flowers Foods, Inc. Annual Executive Bonus Plan. (Incorporated by reference
to Flowers Foods Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated February 27, 2008, File No. 1-16247). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
Flowers Foods, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Flowers
Foods Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated March 27, 2002, File No. 1-16247). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement, by and between Flowers Foods, Inc., certain executive officers
and the directors of Flowers Foods, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Annual Report
on Form 10-K, dated March 28, 2003, File No. 1-16247). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
Form of Separation Agreement, by and between Flowers Foods, Inc. and certain executive officers of
Flowers Foods, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Annual Report on Form 10-K dated
March 1, 2006, File No. 1-16247). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
Ninth Amendment dated November 7, 2005 to the Flowers Foods, Inc. Retirement Plan No. 1 as Amended
and restated effective as of March 26, 2001. (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q dated November 17, 2005, File No. 1-16247). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement, by and between Flowers Foods, Inc. and certain executive
officers of Flowers Foods, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Annual Report on Form
10-K dated March 1, 2006, File No. 1-16247). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
|
|
Form of 2008 Restricted Stock Agreement, by and between Flowers Foods, Inc. and certain executive
officers of Flowers Foods, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Annual Report on Form
10-K dated February 27, 2008, File No. 1-16247). |
34
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
No. |
|
|
|
Name of Exhibit |
10.12
|
|
|
|
Form of Option Agreement, by and between Flowers Foods, Inc. and certain executive officers of
Flowers Foods, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Annual Report on Form 10-K dated
March 1, 2006, File No. 1-16247). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
|
|
Form of 2008 Option Agreement, by and between Flowers Foods, Inc. and certain executive officers of
Flowers Foods, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Annual Report on Form 10-K dated
February 27, 2008, File No. 1-16247). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2006, among Flowers Foods, Inc., the
Lenders Party thereto from time to time, Bank of America N.A., Harris N.A. and Cooperative Centrale
Raiffeisen-Boerenleen Bank, B.A., Rabsbank International, New York Branch, as co-documentation
agents, SunTrust Bank, as syndication agent, and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, as
administrative agent. (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Current Report on Form 8-K dated
June 7, 2006, File No. 1-16247). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
|
|
First Amendment dated August 25, 2006 to the Flowers Foods, Inc. 2001 Equity and Performance
Incentive Plan, as previously amended and restated as of February 11, 2005. (Incorporated by
reference to Flowers Foods Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 28, 2007, File No. 1-16247). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
|
|
Second Amendment dated January 2, 2007 to the Flowers Foods, Inc. 2001 Equity and Performance
Incentive Plan, as previously amended and restated as of February 11, 2005. (Incorporated by
reference to Flowers Foods Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 28, 2007, File No. 1-16247). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
|
|
Third Amendment dated January 23, 2007 to the Flowers Foods, Inc. 2001 Equity and Performance
Incentive Plan, as previously amended and restated as of February 11, 2005. (Incorporated by
reference to Flowers Foods Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 28, 2007, File No. 1-16247). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
|
|
Fourth Amendment to the Flowers Foods, Inc. 2001 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan, as
previously amended and restated as of February 11, 2005. (Incorporated by reference to Flowers
Foods Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 27, 2008, Nile No. 1-16247). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement, effective September 15, 2007, by and between Flowers Foods, Inc. and Jimmy M.
Woodward. (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 31,
2007, File No. 1-16247). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
|
|
First Amendment and Waiver, dated October 5, 2007, among Flowers Foods, Inc., a Georgia
corporation, the lenders party to the Credit Agreement and Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as
Administrative Agent. (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Current Report on Form 8-K dated
October 11, 2007, File No. 1-16247). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated June 23, 2008, by and among, Flowers Foods, Inc., Peachtree
Acquisition Co., LLC, Holsum Bakery, Inc., Lloyd Edward Eisele, Jr. and The Lloyd Edward Eisele,
Jr. Revocable Trust (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Current Report on Form 8-K/A dated
June 25, 2008, File No. 1-16247). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2008, among Flowers Foods, Inc., the Lenders Party thereto
from time to time, Bank of America N.A., Cooperative Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleen Bank, B.A.,
Rabobank International, New York Branch, and Branch Banking & Trust Company as co-documentation
agents, SunTrust Bank, as syndication agent, and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, as
administrative agent (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Current Report on Form 8-K dated
August 6, 2008, File No. 1-16247). |
|
|
|
|
|
*21
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of Flowers Foods, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
*31.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
*31.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
*31.3
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
*32
|
|
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by George E. Deese, Chief Executive Officer, R. Steve Kinsey, Chief
Financial Officer and Karyl H. Lauder, Chief Accounting Officer for the Quarter Ended July 12,
2008. |
35