UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015
Commission file number 001-11252
Hallmark Financial Services, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada |
87-0447375 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
Incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) | |
777 Main Street, Suite 1000, Fort Worth, Texas |
76102 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
(Zip Code) |
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (817) 348-1600
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ¨ | Accelerated filer x |
Non-accelerated filer ¨ | Smaller reporting company ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: Common Stock, par value $.18 per share – 19,144,294 shares outstanding as of November 5, 2015.
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
2
Hallmark Financial Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
($ in thousands, except par value )
September 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Investments: | ||||||||
Debt securities, available-for-sale, at fair value (cost: $524,908 in 2015 and $450,770 in 2014) | $ | 519,163 | $ | 450,785 | ||||
Equity securities, available-for-sale, at fair value (cost: $24,957 in 2015 and $25,360 in 2014) | 48,229 | 56,444 | ||||||
Total investments | 567,392 | 507,229 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 93,049 | 130,985 | ||||||
Restricted cash | 18,525 | 11,914 | ||||||
Ceded unearned premiums | 64,115 | 53,376 | ||||||
Premiums receivable | 86,877 | 71,003 | ||||||
Accounts receivable | 2,241 | 3,141 | ||||||
Receivable for securities | 2,354 | 932 | ||||||
Reinsurance recoverable | 116,342 | 109,719 | ||||||
Deferred policy acquisition costs | 21,110 | 20,746 | ||||||
Goodwill | 44,695 | 44,695 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net | 15,576 | 17,427 | ||||||
Deferred federal income taxes, net | 2,832 | - | ||||||
Prepaid expenses | 2,920 | 1,823 | ||||||
Other assets | 10,632 | 7,879 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,048,660 | $ | 980,869 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||
Subordinated debt securities | $ | 56,702 | $ | 56,702 | ||||
Reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses | 451,383 | 415,135 | ||||||
Unearned premiums | 218,590 | 196,826 | ||||||
Reinsurance balances payable | 32,832 | 26,403 | ||||||
Pension liability | 2,481 | 2,619 | ||||||
Payable for securities | 4,269 | 1,321 | ||||||
Federal income tax payable | 522 | 968 | ||||||
Deferred federal income taxes, net | - | 3,092 | ||||||
Accounts payable and other accrued expenses | 21,089 | 25,766 | ||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 787,868 | $ | 728,832 | ||||
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 17) | ||||||||
Stockholders' equity: | ||||||||
Common stock, $.18 par value, authorized 33,333,333; issued 20,872,831 shares in 2015 and 2014 | 3,757 | 3,757 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 123,606 | 123,194 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 138,055 | 119,638 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 8,921 | 17,801 | ||||||
Treasury stock (1,728,537 shares in 2015 and 1,655,306 in 2014), at cost | (13,547 | ) | (12,353 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders' equity | 260,792 | 252,037 | ||||||
$ | 1,048,660 | $ | 980,869 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements
3
Hallmark Financial Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
Gross premiums written | $ | 132,141 | $ | 122,723 | $ | 390,708 | $ | 363,245 | ||||||||
Ceded premiums written | (42,217 | ) | (38,698 | ) | (116,105 | ) | (122,596 | ) | ||||||||
Net premiums written | 89,924 | 84,025 | 274,603 | 240,649 | ||||||||||||
Change in unearned premiums | (1,518 | ) | (6,878 | ) | (11,025 | ) | (2,879 | ) | ||||||||
Net premiums earned | 88,406 | 77,147 | 263,578 | 237,770 | ||||||||||||
Investment income, net of expenses | 3,495 | 2,912 | 10,051 | 9,139 | ||||||||||||
Net realized gains (losses) | (335 | ) | (23 | ) | 3,688 | (122 | ) | |||||||||
Finance charges | 1,619 | 1,300 | 4,400 | 4,067 | ||||||||||||
Commission and fees | 60 | 71 | (41 | ) | (1,528 | ) | ||||||||||
Other income | 439 | 10 | 655 | 36 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues | 93,684 | 81,417 | 282,331 | 249,362 | ||||||||||||
Losses and loss adjustment expenses | 56,005 | 50,509 | 171,820 | 155,781 | ||||||||||||
Other operating expenses | 26,458 | 24,409 | 78,818 | 75,055 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense | 769 | 1,140 | 3,043 | 3,435 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 617 | 631 | 1,851 | 1,909 | ||||||||||||
Total expenses | 83,849 | 76,689 | 255,532 | 236,180 | ||||||||||||
Income before tax | 9,835 | 4,728 | 26,799 | 13,182 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense | 3,137 | 1,265 | 8,382 | 3,520 | ||||||||||||
Net income | 6,698 | 3,463 | 18,417 | 9,662 | ||||||||||||
Net income per share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.96 | $ | 0.50 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.95 | $ | 0.50 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements
4
Hallmark Financial Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(Unaudited)
($ in thousands)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 6,698 | $ | 3,463 | $ | 18,417 | $ | 9,662 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): | ||||||||||||||||
Change in net actuarial gain | 26 | 40 | 78 | 122 | ||||||||||||
Tax effect on change in net actuarial gain | (9 | ) | (14 | ) | (27 | ) | (43 | ) | ||||||||
Unrealized holding (losses) gains arising during the period | (10,821 | ) | (221 | ) | (7,858 | ) | 1,900 | |||||||||
Tax effect on unrealized holding (losses) gains arising during the period | 3,787 | 77 | 2,750 | (665 | ) | |||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income | (28 | ) | 23 | (5,881 | ) | 122 | ||||||||||
Tax effect on reclassification adjustment for gains (losses) included in net income | 10 | (8 | ) | 2,058 | (43 | ) | ||||||||||
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax | (7,035 | ) | (103 | ) | (8,880 | ) | 1,393 | |||||||||
Comprehensive (loss) income | $ | (337 | ) | $ | 3,360 | $ | 9,537 | $ | 11,055 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements
5
Hallmark Financial Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
(Unaudited)
($ in thousands)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
Common Stock | ||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 3,757 | $ | 3,757 | $ | 3,757 | $ | 3,757 | ||||||||
Balance, end of period | 3,757 | 3,757 | 3,757 | 3,757 | ||||||||||||
Additional Paid-In Capital | ||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period | 123,618 | 123,048 | 123,194 | 122,827 | ||||||||||||
Equity based compensation | (11 | ) | (135 | ) | 526 | 87 | ||||||||||
Shares issued under employee benefit plans | (1 | ) | - | (114 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||||
Balance, end of period | 123,606 | 122,913 | 123,606 | 122,913 | ||||||||||||
Retained Earnings | ||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period | 131,357 | 112,408 | 119,638 | 106,209 | ||||||||||||
Net income | 6,698 | 3,463 | 18,417 | 9,662 | ||||||||||||
Balance, end of period | 138,055 | 115,871 | 138,055 | 115,871 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | ||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period | 15,956 | 18,379 | 17,801 | 16,883 | ||||||||||||
Additional minimum pension liability, net of tax | 17 | 26 | 51 | 79 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized holding (losses) gains arising during period, net of tax | (7,034 | ) | (144 | ) | (5,108 | ) | 1,235 | |||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income, net of tax | (18 | ) | 15 | (3,823 | ) | 79 | ||||||||||
Balance, end of period | 8,921 | 18,276 | 8,921 | 18,276 | ||||||||||||
Treasury Stock | ||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period | (12,376 | ) | (12,278 | ) | (12,353 | ) | (11,558 | ) | ||||||||
Acquisition of treasury stock | (1,180 | ) | (659 | ) | (1,910 | ) | (1,395 | ) | ||||||||
Shares issued under employee benefit plans | 9 | - | 716 | 16 | ||||||||||||
Balance, end of period | (13,547 | ) | (12,937 | ) | (13,547 | ) | (12,937 | ) | ||||||||
Total Stockholders' Equity | $ | 260,792 | $ | 247,880 | $ | 260,792 | $ | 247,880 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements
6
Hallmark Financial Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
($ in thousands)
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 18,417 | $ | 9,662 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense | 2,346 | 2,822 | ||||||
Deferred federal income taxes | (1,311 | ) | (182 | ) | ||||
Net realized (gains) losses | (3,688 | ) | 122 | |||||
Share-based payments expense | 526 | 87 | ||||||
Change in ceded unearned premiums | (10,739 | ) | (17,001 | ) | ||||
Change in premiums receivable | (15,874 | ) | (11,315 | ) | ||||
Change in accounts receivable | 900 | (372 | ) | |||||
Change in deferred policy acquisition costs | (364 | ) | 1,921 | |||||
Change in unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses | 36,248 | 32,112 | ||||||
Change in unearned premiums | 21,764 | 19,881 | ||||||
Change in reinsurance recoverable | (6,623 | ) | (28,619 | ) | ||||
Change in reinsurance balances payable | 6,429 | 12,049 | ||||||
Change in current federal income tax payable | (446 | ) | (1,407 | ) | ||||
Change in all other liabilities | (3,599 | ) | 941 | |||||
Change in all other assets | (885 | ) | 1,009 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 43,101 | 21,710 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment | (2,569 | ) | (809 | ) | ||||
Net transfers into restricted cash | (6,611 | ) | (4,692 | ) | ||||
Purchases of investment securities | (167,677 | ) | (108,753 | ) | ||||
Maturities, sales and redemptions of investment securities | 98,344 | 113,758 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (78,513 | ) | (496 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||
Activity under revolving credit facility, net | - | (1,473 | ) | |||||
Payment of contingent consideration | (1,216 | ) | - | |||||
Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options | 602 | 15 | ||||||
Purchase of treasury shares | (1,910 | ) | (1,395 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (2,524 | ) | (2,853 | ) | ||||
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (37,936 | ) | 18,361 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 130,985 | 141,666 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 93,049 | $ | 160,027 | ||||
Supplemental cash flow information: | ||||||||
Interest paid | $ | 3,043 | $ | 3,435 | ||||
Income taxes paid | $ | 10,139 | $ | 5,109 | ||||
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing activities: | ||||||||
Change in receivable for securities related to investment disposals that settled after the balance sheet date | $ | 1,422 | $ | 1,505 | ||||
Change in payable for securities related to investment purchases that settled after the balance sheet date | $ | (2,948 | ) | $ | (9,880 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements
7
Hallmark Financial Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1. General
Hallmark Financial Services, Inc. (“Hallmark” and, together with subsidiaries, “we,” “us” or “our”) is an insurance holding company engaged in the sale of property/casualty insurance products to businesses and individuals. Our business involves marketing, distributing, underwriting and servicing our insurance products, as well as providing other insurance related services.
We pursue our business activities primarily through subsidiaries whose operations are organized into product-specific operating units that are supported by our insurance company subsidiaries. Our Standard Commercial P&C operating unit offers industry-specific commercial insurance products and services in the standard market. Our Workers Compensation operating unit specializes in small and middle market workers compensation business. Effective July 1, 2015, this operating unit no longer markets or retains any risk on new or renewal policies. Our MGA Commercial Products operating unit offers commercial insurance products and services in the excess and surplus lines market. Our Specialty Commercial operating unit offers general aviation and satellite launch insurance products and services, low and middle market commercial umbrella and primary/excess liability insurance, medical professional liability insurance products and services, and primary/excess commercial property coverages for both catastrophe and non-catastrophe exposures. Our Specialty Personal Lines operating unit offers non-standard personal automobile and renters insurance products and services. Our insurance company subsidiaries supporting these operating units are American Hallmark Insurance Company of Texas, Hallmark Insurance Company, Hallmark Specialty Insurance Company, Hallmark County Mutual Insurance Company, Hallmark National Insurance Company and Texas Builders Insurance Company.
These operating units are segregated into three reportable industry segments for financial accounting purposes. The Standard Commercial Segment includes our Standard Commercial P&C operating unit and our Workers Compensation operating unit. The Specialty Commercial Segment includes our MGA Commercial Products operating unit and our Specialty Commercial operating unit. The Personal Segment consists solely of our Personal Lines operating unit.
2. Basis of Presentation
Our unaudited consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and include our accounts and the accounts of our subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim financial reporting. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.
The interim financial data as of September 30, 2015 and 2014 is unaudited. However, in the opinion of management, the interim data includes all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods. The results of operations for the period ended September 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for the full year.
8
Business Combinations
We account for business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting pursuant to Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805, “Business Combinations.” The base cash purchase price plus the estimated fair value of any non-cash or contingent consideration given for an acquired business is allocated to the assets acquired (including identified intangible assets) and liabilities assumed based on the estimated fair values of such assets and liabilities. The excess of the fair value of the total consideration given for an acquired business over the aggregate net fair values assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill. Contingent consideration is recognized as a liability at fair value as of the acquisition date with subsequent fair value adjustments recorded in the consolidated statements of operations. The valuation of contingent consideration requires assumptions regarding anticipated cash flows, probabilities of cash flows, discount rates and other factors. Significant judgment is employed in determining the propriety of these assumptions as of the acquisition date and for each subsequent period. Accordingly, future business and economic conditions, as well as changes in any of the assumptions, can materially impact the amount of contingent consideration expense we record in any given period. Indirect and general expenses related to business combinations are expensed as incurred.
Income Taxes
We file a consolidated federal income tax return. Deferred federal income taxes reflect the future tax consequences of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year end. Deferred taxes are recognized using the liability method, whereby tax rates are applied to cumulative temporary differences based on when and how they are expected to affect the tax return. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for tax rate changes in effect for the year in which these temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of the Financial Statements
Our preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect our reported amounts of assets and liabilities and our disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our consolidated financial statements, as well as our reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Refer to “Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgments” under Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 for information on accounting policies that we consider critical in preparing our consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair value estimates are made at a point in time based on relevant market data as well as the best information available about the financial instruments. Fair value estimates for financial instruments for which no or limited observable market data is available are based on judgments regarding current economic conditions, credit and interest rate risk. These estimates involve significant uncertainties and judgments and cannot be determined with precision. As a result, such calculated fair value estimates may not be realizable in a current sale or immediate settlement of the instrument. In addition, changes in the underlying assumptions used in the fair value measurement technique, including discount rate and estimates of future cash flows, could significantly affect these fair value estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents: The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for these instruments approximate their fair values.
Restricted Cash: The carrying amount for restricted cash reported in the balance sheet approximates the fair value.
9
Subordinated Debt Securities: Our trust preferred securities have a carried value of $56.7 million and a fair value of $45.9 million as of September 30, 2015. The fair value of our trust preferred securities is based on discounted cash flows using a current yield to maturity of 8.0%, which is based on similar issues to discount future cash flows. Our trust preferred securities would be included in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy if they were reported at fair value.
For reinsurance balances, premiums receivable, federal income tax payable, other assets and other liabilities, the carrying amounts approximate fair value because of the short maturity of such financial instruments.
Variable Interest Entities
On June 21, 2005, we formed Hallmark Statutory Trust I (“Trust I”), an unconsolidated trust subsidiary, for the sole purpose of issuing $30.0 million in trust preferred securities. Trust I used the proceeds from the sale of these securities and our initial capital contribution to purchase $30.9 million of subordinated debt securities from Hallmark. The debt securities are the sole assets of Trust I, and the payments under the debt securities are the sole revenues of Trust I.
On August 23, 2007, we formed Hallmark Statutory Trust II (“Trust II”), an unconsolidated trust subsidiary, for the sole purpose of issuing $25.0 million in trust preferred securities. Trust II used the proceeds from the sale of these securities and our initial capital contribution to purchase $25.8 million of subordinated debt securities from Hallmark. The debt securities are the sole assets of Trust II, and the payments under the debt securities are the sole revenues of Trust II.
We evaluate on an ongoing basis our investments in Trust I and Trust II (collectively the “Trusts”) and have determined that we do not have a variable interest in the Trusts. Therefore, the Trusts are not included in our consolidated financial statements.
We are also involved in the normal course of business with variable interest entities (“VIE’s”) primarily as a passive investor in mortgage-backed securities and certain collateralized corporate bank loans issued by third party VIE’s. The maximum exposure to loss with respect to these investments is the investment carrying values included in the consolidated balance sheets.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the FASB issued guidance which revises the criteria for revenue recognition. Insurance contracts are excluded from the scope of the new guidance. Under the guidance, the transaction price is attributed to underlying performance obligations in the contract and revenue is recognized as the entity satisfies the performance obligations and transfers control of a good or service to the customer. Incremental costs of obtaining a contract may be capitalized to the extent the entity expects to recover those costs. The guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and is to be applied retrospectively. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption, which is not expected to be material to our results of operations or financial position.
In May 2015, the FASB issued guidance which requires additional disclosures about short-duration contracts for products in effect for typically a year or less. The disclosures will focus on the liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses. This guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption, which is not expected to be material to our results of operations or financial position.
10
3. Business Combinations
Effective July 1, 2011, we acquired all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of TBIC Holding Corporation (“TBIC Holding”) for initial consideration of $1.6 million paid in cash on July 1, 2011. In addition, a holdback purchase price of $350 thousand was paid during the third quarter of 2012. A contingent purchase price of $1.2 million was paid in the third quarter of 2015 based upon a formula contained in the acquisition agreement. The sellers have asserted that up to an additional $1.8 million in contingent purchase price is payable pursuant to the contractual formula. We disagree with this assertion and are in discussions with the Sellers in regards to a potential resolution.
On June 30, 2015, Redpoint Comp Holdings LLC (“Purchaser”) acquired exclusive renewal rights to our current in-force Texas workers compensation policies, together with certain physical assets associated with the administration of such in-force policies. In consideration for such renewal rights and physical assets, Purchaser assumed certain office lease obligations and offered employment to certain of our employees associated with the Workers Compensation operating unit. Purchaser also agreed to administer the run-off of all of our current workers compensation policies and claims for a period of three years. In connection with the transaction, we made a one-time payment to the Purchaser of $83,000. We also agreed not to compete in the workers compensation line of insurance in the State of Texas (with certain exceptions) until after the assumed office lease obligations expire on October 31, 2017. We recorded a gain of $0.2 million in Other Income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations on the sale of the renewal rights.
On September 15, 2015, we executed Amendment No. 1 to the sale agreement with the Purchaser. Pursuant to the Amendment, the Purchaser has agreed to pay us an additional $115,000 and administer the run-off of all of our workers compensation policies and claims in perpetuity or through final conclusion (rather than for three years as contemplated by the original agreement) in consideration of us assigning to Purchaser the commission on all unearned premiums on such policies as of July 1, 2015. We recorded an additional gain of $0.4 million in Other Income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as a result of this Amendment No.1.
4. Fair Value
ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. ASC 820, among other things, requires us to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. In addition, ASC 820 precludes the use of block discounts when measuring the fair value of instruments traded in an active market, which were previously applied to large holdings of publicly traded equity securities.
We determine the fair value of our financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy established in ASC 820. In accordance with ASC 820, we utilize the following fair value hierarchy:
· | Level 1: quoted prices in active markets for identical assets; |
· | Level 2: inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, inputs of identical assets for less active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the instrument; and |
11
· | Level 3: inputs to the valuation methodology that are unobservable for the asset or liability. |
This hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available.
Under ASC 820, we determine fair value based on the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. It is our policy to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when developing fair value measurements, in accordance with the fair value hierarchy described above. Fair value measurements for assets and liabilities where there exists limited or no observable market data are calculated based upon our pricing policy, the economic and competitive environment, the characteristics of the asset or liability and other factors as appropriate. These estimated fair values may not be realized upon actual sale or immediate settlement of the asset or liability.
Where quoted prices are available on active exchanges for identical instruments, investment securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 investment securities include common and preferred stock.
Level 2 investment securities include corporate bonds, collateralized corporate bank loans, municipal bonds, and U.S. Treasury securities for which quoted prices are not available on active exchanges for identical instruments. We use third party pricing services to determine fair values for each Level 2 investment security in all asset classes. Since quoted prices in active markets for identical assets are not available, these prices are determined using observable market information such as quotes from less active markets and/or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, among other things. We have reviewed the processes used by the pricing services and have determined that they result in fair values consistent with the requirements of ASC 820 for Level 2 investment securities. We have not adjusted any prices received from the third party pricing services.
In cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to the valuation, investment securities are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 3 investments are valued based on the best available data in order to approximate fair value. This data may be internally developed and consider risk premiums that a market participant would require. Investment securities classified within Level 3 include other less liquid investment securities.
There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 securities during the periods presented.
12
The following table presents for each of the fair value hierarchy levels, our assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (in thousands):
As of September 30, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in | Other | |||||||||||||||
Active Markets for | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Identical Assets | Inputs | Inputs | ||||||||||||||
(Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | Total | |||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government | $ | - | $ | 91,681 | $ | - | $ | 91,681 | ||||||||
Corporate bonds | - | 50,610 | - | 50,610 | ||||||||||||
Collateralized corporate bank loans | - | 122,134 | - | 122,134 | ||||||||||||
Municipal bonds | - | 178,100 | 13,848 | 191,948 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed | - | 62,790 | - | 62,790 | ||||||||||||
Total debt securities | - | 505,315 | 13,848 | 519,163 | ||||||||||||
Total equity securities | 48,229 | - | - | 48,229 | ||||||||||||
Total debt and equity securities | $ | 48,229 | $ | 505,315 | $ | 13,848 | $ | 567,392 |
As of December 31, 2014 | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in | Other | |||||||||||||||
Active Markets for | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Identical Assets | Inputs | Inputs | ||||||||||||||
(Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | Total | |||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government | $ | - | $ | 93,305 | $ | - | $ | 93,305 | ||||||||
Corporate bonds | - | 29,442 | - | 29,442 | ||||||||||||
Collateralized corporate bank loans | - | 113,402 | 247 | 113,649 | ||||||||||||
Municipal bonds | - | 147,978 | 14,351 | 162,329 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed | - | 52,060 | - | 52,060 | ||||||||||||
Total debt securities | - | 436,187 | 14,598 | 450,785 | ||||||||||||
Total equity securities | 56,444 | - | - | 56,444 | ||||||||||||
Total debt and equity securities | $ | 56,444 | $ | 436,187 | $ | 14,598 | $ | 507,229 |
Due to significant unobservable inputs into the valuation model for certain municipal bonds in illiquid markets, as of September 30, 2015, we classified these investments as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. We used an income approach in order to derive an estimated fair value of the municipal bonds classified as Level 3, which included inputs such as expected holding period, benchmark swap rate, benchmark discount rate and a discount rate premium for illiquidity. Significant changes in the unobservable inputs in the fair value measurement of our municipal bonds could result in a significant change in the fair value measurement.
13
The following table summarizes the changes in fair value for all financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):
Beginning balance as of January 1, 2015 | $ | 14,598 | ||
Sales | - | |||
Settlements | (370 | ) | ||
Purchases | - | |||
Issuances | - | |||
Total realized/unrealized gains included in net income | - | |||
Net losses included in other comprehensive income | (380 | ) | ||
Transfers into Level 3 | - | |||
Transfers out of Level 3 | - | |||
Ending balance as of September 30, 2015 | $ | 13,848 | ||
Beginning balance as of January 1, 2014 | $ | 17,517 | ||
Sales | - | |||
Settlements | (3,434 | ) | ||
Purchases | - | |||
Issuances | - | |||
Total realized/unrealized gains included in net income | - | |||
Net gains included in other comprehensive income | 460 | |||
Transfers into Level 3 | - | |||
Transfers out of Level 3 | - | |||
Ending balance as of September 30, 2014 | $ | 14,543 |
14
5. Investments
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investments in debt and equity securities by category is as follows (in thousands):
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
As of September 30, 2015 | Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government | $ | 91,311 | $ | 370 | $ | - | $ | 91,681 | ||||||||
Corporate bonds | 50,638 | 586 | (614 | ) | 50,610 | |||||||||||
Collateralized corporate bank loans | 124,158 | 344 | (2,368 | ) | 122,134 | |||||||||||
Municipal bonds | 196,174 | 2,108 | (6,334 | ) | 191,948 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed | 62,627 | 283 | (120 | ) | 62,790 | |||||||||||
Total debt securities | 524,908 | 3,691 | (9,436 | ) | 519,163 | |||||||||||
Total equity securities | 24,957 | 23,998 | (726 | ) | 48,229 | |||||||||||
Total debt and equity securities | $ | 549,865 | $ | 27,689 | $ | (10,162 | ) | $ | 567,392 | |||||||
As of December 31, 2014 | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government | $ | 93,280 | $ | 29 | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 93,305 | |||||||
Corporate bonds | 28,643 | 884 | (85 | ) | 29,442 | |||||||||||
Collateralized corporate bank loans | 115,358 | 206 | (1,915 | ) | 113,649 | |||||||||||
Municipal bonds | 161,546 | 2,384 | (1,601 | ) | 162,329 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed | 51,943 | 487 | (370 | ) | 52,060 | |||||||||||
Total debt securities | 450,770 | 3,990 | (3,975 | ) | 450,785 | |||||||||||
Total equity securities | 25,360 | 31,086 | (2 | ) | 56,444 | |||||||||||
Total debt and equity securities | $ | 476,130 | $ | 35,076 | $ | (3,977 | ) | $ | 507,229 |
15
Major categories of net realized gains (losses) on investments are summarized as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||
Corporate bonds | - | (22 | ) | - | 111 | |||||||||||
Collateralized corporate bank loans | 8 | 10 | 158 | 99 | ||||||||||||
Municipal bonds | (12 | ) | (69 | ) | (54 | ) | (123 | ) | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed | - | 29 | 240 | 31 | ||||||||||||
Equity securities | 32 | 29 | 5,537 | 34 | ||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on investments | 28 | (23 | ) | 5,881 | 152 | |||||||||||
Other-than-temporary impairments | (363 | ) | - | (2,193 | ) | (274 | ) | |||||||||
Net realized gains (losses) | $ | (335 | ) | $ | (23 | ) | $ | 3,688 | $ | (122 | ) |
We realized gross gains on investments of $76 thousand and $0.1 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $6.0 million and $0.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. We realized gross losses on investments of $48 thousand and $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. We recorded proceeds from the sale of investment securities of $0.8 million and $0.6 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $17.7 million and $14.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Realized investment gains and losses are recognized in operations on the specific identification method.
The following schedules summarize the gross unrealized losses showing the length of time that investments have been continuously in an unrealized loss position as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (in thousands):
16
As of September 30, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 months or less | Longer than 12 months | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Losses | Fair Value | Losses | Fair Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||||
Corporate bonds | 30,917 | (614 | ) | - | - | 30,917 | (614 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Collateralized corporate bank loans | 59,675 | (1,387 | ) | 4,643 | (981 | ) | 64,318 | (2,368 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Municipal bonds | 38,894 | (517 | ) | 21,985 | (5,817 | ) | 60,879 | (6,334 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed | 25,850 | (118 | ) | 72 | (2 | ) | 25,922 | (120 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total debt securities | 155,336 | (2,636 | ) | 26,700 | (6,800 | ) | 182,036 | (9,436 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total equity securities | 4,611 | (726 | ) | - | - | 4,611 | (726 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total debt and equity securities | $ | 159,947 | $ | (3,362 | ) | $ | 26,700 | $ | (6,800 | ) | $ | 186,647 | $ | (10,162 | ) |
As of December 31, 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 months or less | Longer than 12 months | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Losses | Fair Value | Losses | Fair Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government | $ | 15,005 | $ | (4 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 15,005 | $ | (4 | ) | ||||||||||
Corporate bonds | 7,552 | (85 | ) | - | - | 7,552 | (85 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Collateralized corporate bank loans | 64,712 | (824 | ) | 8,898 | (1,091 | ) | 73,610 | (1,915 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Municipal bonds | 50,546 | (945 | ) | 15,684 | (656 | ) | 66,230 | (1,601 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed | 20,469 | (365 | ) | 2,966 | (5 | ) | 23,435 | (370 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total debt securities | 158,284 | (2,223 | ) | 27,548 | (1,752 | ) | 185,832 | (3,975 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total equity securities | 129 | (2 | ) | - | - | 129 | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total debt and equity securities | $ | 158,413 | $ | (2,225 | ) | $ | 27,548 | $ | (1,752 | ) | $ | 185,961 | $ | (3,977 | ) |
At September 30, 2015, the gross unrealized losses more than twelve months old were attributable to 25 debt security positions. At December 31, 2014, the gross unrealized losses more than twelve months old were attributable to 24 debt security positions. We consider these losses as a temporary decline in value as they are predominately on bonds that we do not intend to sell and do not believe we will be required to sell prior to recovery of our amortized cost basis. We see no other indications that the decline in values of these securities is other-than-temporary.
We complete a detailed analysis each quarter to assess whether any decline in the fair value of any investment below cost is deemed other-than-temporary. All securities with an unrealized loss are reviewed. We recognize an impairment loss when an investment's value declines below cost, adjusted for accretion, amortization and previous other-than-temporary impairments, and it is determined that the decline is other-than-temporary.
Debt Investments: We assess whether we intend to sell, or it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell, a fixed maturity investment before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current period credit losses. For fixed maturity investments that are considered other-than-temporarily impaired and that we do not intend to sell and will not be required to sell, we separate the amount of the impairment into the amount that is credit related (credit loss component) and the amount due to all other factors. The credit loss component is recognized in earnings and is the difference between the investment’s amortized cost basis and the present value of its expected future cash flows. The remaining difference between the investment’s fair value and the present value of future expected cash flows is recognized in other comprehensive income.
17
Equity Investments: Some of the factors considered in evaluating whether a decline in fair value for an equity investment is other-than-temporary include: (1) our ability and intent to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in value; (2) the recoverability of cost; (3) the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than cost; and (4) the financial condition and near-term and long-term prospects for the issuer, including the relevant industry conditions and trends, and implications of rating agency actions and offering prices. When it is determined that an equity investment is other-than-temporarily impaired, the security is written down to fair value, and the amount of the impairment is included in earnings as a realized investment loss. The fair value then becomes the new cost basis of the investment, and any subsequent recoveries in fair value are recognized at disposition. We recognize a realized loss when impairment is deemed to be other-than-temporary even if a decision to sell an equity investment has not been made. When we decide to sell a temporarily impaired available-for-sale equity investment and we do not expect the fair value of the equity investment to fully recover prior to the expected time of sale, the investment is deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired in the period in which the decision to sell is made.
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities at September 30, 2015 by contractual maturity are as follows. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because certain borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without penalties.
Amortized | Fair | |||||||
Cost | Value | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Due in one year or less | $ | 58,057 | $ | 57,912 | ||||
Due after one year through five years | 232,118 | 230,320 | ||||||
Due after five years through ten years | 116,755 | 113,043 | ||||||
Due after ten years | 55,351 | 55,098 | ||||||
Mortgage-backed | 62,627 | 62,790 | ||||||
$ | 524,908 | $ | 519,163 |
6. Pledged Investments
We have pledged certain of our securities for the benefit of various state insurance departments and reinsurers. These securities are included with our available-for-sale debt securities because we have the ability to trade these securities. We retain the interest earned on these securities. These securities had a carrying value of $19.9 million and $20.3 million at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.
18
7. Reserves for Unpaid Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses
We recorded $3.1 million of favorable prior years’ net loss development during the three months ended September 30, 2015. We recorded $4.6 million of favorable prior years’ net loss development during the nine months ended September 30, 2015. For the year to date, the $4.6 million of favorable development was attributable to $4.0 million favorable development on claims incurred in the 2014 accident year, $2.1 million favorable development on claims incurred during the 2011 and prior accident years, partially offset by $0.5 million unfavorable development on claims incurred in the 2013 accident year and $1.0 million unfavorable development on claims incurred in the 2012 accident year. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, our Standard Commercial P&C operating unit accounted for $4.0 million of the favorable development, our Workers Compensation operating unit accounted for $0.8 million of the favorable development, our MGA Commercial Products operating unit accounted for $0.5 million of the favorable development and our Specialty Commercial operating unit accounted for $1.3 million of the favorable development. These favorable developments were partially offset by unfavorable development of $2.0 million in our Personal Segment. The favorable development for our Standard Commercial P&C operating unit of $4.0 million was driven primarily by our general liability and commercial property lines of business in the 2014 and prior accident years. The favorable development of $0.8 million for our Workers Compensation operating unit was primarily attributable to the 2014 through 2011 accident years. The favorable development of $0.5 million in our MGA Commercial Products operating unit was primarily driven by favorable development in our commercial auto liability and general liability lines of business. The favorable development of $1.3 million in our Specialty Commercial operating unit consisted of $0.3 million of favorable development in our commercial excess liability line of business, $0.3 million in our professional medical liability products and $0.7 million of favorable development in our general aviation line of business. The unfavorable development of $2.0 million in our Personal Segment was primarily attributable to the 2014 and prior accident years.
We recorded $1.5 million of unfavorable prior years’ net loss development during the three months ended September 30, 2014. We recorded $5.4 million of favorable prior year net loss development during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. For the year to date, the $5.4 million of favorable development was attributable to $6.9 million favorable development on claims incurred in the 2013 accident year, $3.6 million favorable development on claims incurred during the 2011 accident year, partially offset by $3.4 million unfavorable development on claims incurred in the 2012 accident year and $1.7 million unfavorable development on claims incurred in the 2010 and prior accident years. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, our Standard Commercial P&C operating unit accounted for $3.0 million of the favorable development. Our Personal Segment accounted for $3.1 million of the favorable development, our Workers Compensation operating unit accounted for $1.9 million of the favorable development and our Specialty Commercial operating unit accounted for $0.7 million of the favorable development. These favorable developments were partially offset by unfavorable development of $3.3 million in our MGA Commercial Products operating unit. The favorable development for our Standard Commercial P&C operating unit of $3.0 million was driven primarily by our general liability line of business in the 2011 accident year. The favorable development for our Personal Segment of $3.1 million was primarily attributable to the 2013 accident year. The favorable development of $1.9 million for our Workers Compensation operating unit was primarily attributable to the 2013 and 2012 accident years. The favorable development of $0.7 million in our Specialty Commercial operating unit consisted of $0.9 million of favorable development in our commercial excess liability line of business and $0.5 million in our professional medical liability products, partially offset by $0.7 million of unfavorable development in our general aviation line of business. The unfavorable development of $3.3 million in our MGA Commercial Products operating unit was primarily driven by unfavorable development in our commercial auto liability and general liability lines of business.
8. Share-Based Payment Arrangements
Our 2005 Long Term Incentive Plan (“2005 LTIP”) is a stock compensation plan for key employees and non-employee directors that was initially approved by the shareholders on May 26, 2005 and expired by its terms on May 27, 2015. As of September 30, 2015, there were outstanding incentive stock options to purchase 623,290 shares of our common stock, non-qualified stock options to purchase 304,157 shares of our common stock and restricted stock units representing the right to receive up to 289,830 shares of our common stock. The exercise price of all such outstanding stock options is equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant.
19
A new equity compensation plan for our key employees and non-employee directors, the 2015 Long Term Incentive Plan (“2015 LTIP”), was approved by shareholders on May 29, 2015. There are 2,000,000 shares authorized for issuance under the 2015 LTIP. As of September 30, 2015, restricted stock units representing the right to receive up to 154,457 shares of our common stock were outstanding under the 2015 LTIP. There were no stock option awards granted under the 2015 LTIP as of September 30, 2015.
Stock Options:
Incentive stock options granted under the 2005 LTIP prior to 2009 vest 10%, 20%, 30% and 40% on the first, second, third and fourth anniversary dates of the grant, respectively, and terminate five to ten years from the date of grant. Incentive stock options granted in 2009 vest in equal annual increments on each of the first seven anniversary dates and terminate ten years from the date of grant. One grant of 25,000 incentive stock options in 2010 vests in equal annual increments on each of the first three anniversary dates and terminates ten years from the date of grant. Non-qualified stock options granted under the 2005 LTIP generally vest 100% six months after the date of grant and terminate ten years from the date of grant. One grant of 200,000 non-qualified stock options in 2009 vests in equal annual increments on each of the first seven anniversary dates and terminates ten years from the date of grant.
A summary of the status of our stock options as of September 30, 2015 and changes during the nine months ended is presented below:
Average | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Remaining | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||
Average | Contractual | Intrinsic | ||||||||||||||
Number of | Exercise | Term | Value | |||||||||||||
Shares | Price | (Years) | ($000) | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2015 | 1,062,134 | $ | 9.51 | |||||||||||||
Granted | - | |||||||||||||||
Exercised | (86,827 | ) | $ | 6.93 | ||||||||||||
Forfeited or expired | (47,860 | ) | $ | 11.26 | ||||||||||||
Outstanding at September 30, 2015 | 927,447 | $ | 9.66 | 2.7 | $ | 2,002 | ||||||||||
Exercisable at September 30, 2015 | 875,661 | $ | 9.84 | 2.6 | $ | 1,749 |
The following table details the intrinsic value of options exercised, total cost of share-based payments charged against income before income tax benefit and the amount of related income tax benefit recognized in income for the periods indicated (in thousands):
20
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
Intrinsic value of options exercised | $ | 5 | $ | - | $ | 387 | $ | 9 | ||||||||
Cost of share-based payments (non-cash) | $ | 38 | $ | 35 | $ | 118 | $ | 133 | ||||||||
Income tax benefit of share-based payments recognized in income | $ | 8 | $ | 8 | $ | 23 | $ | 23 |
As of September 30, 2015, there was $79 thousand of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options granted under our plans, of which $39 thousand is expected to be recognized during the remainder of 2015 and $40 thousand is expected to be recognized in 2016.
The fair value of each stock option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of Hallmark’s and similar companies’ common stock for a period equal to the expected term. The risk-free interest rates for periods within the contractual term of the options are based on rates for U.S. Treasury Notes with maturity dates corresponding to the options’ expected lives on the dates of grant. Expected term is determined based on the simplified method as we do not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a basis for estimating the expected term. There were no stock options granted during the first nine months of 2015 or 2014.
Restricted Stock Units:
The 2005 LTIP was amended by the stockholders on May 30, 2013 to authorize the grant of restricted stock units, in addition to the other types of awards available thereunder. Restricted stock units awarded under the 2005 LTIP represent the right to receive shares of common stock upon the satisfaction of vesting requirements, performance criteria and other terms and conditions. On July 27, 2012 and April 10, 2013, an aggregate of 129,463 and 122,823 restricted stock units, respectively, were conditionally granted to certain of our employees subject to shareholder approval of the amendments to the 2005 LTIP at the May 30, 2013 shareholder meeting. One conditional grant of 9,280 restricted stock units was forfeited prior to approval at the shareholder meeting. Subsequently on September 8, 2014, an aggregate of 175,983 restricted stock units were granted to certain employees. On May 29, 2015, an aggregate of 102,971 restricted stock units were granted to certain employees under the 2015 LTIP.
The performance criteria for all restricted stock units require that we achieve certain compound average annual growth rates in book value per share over the vesting period in order to receive shares of common stock in amounts ranging from 50% to 150% of the number of restricted stock units granted. In addition, certain restricted stock units contain an additional performance criteria related to the attainment of an average combined ratio percentage over the vesting period. Grantees of restricted stock units do not have any rights of a stockholder, and do not participate in any distributions to our common stockholders, until the award fully vests upon satisfaction of the vesting schedule, performance criteria and other conditions set forth in their award agreement. Therefore, unvested restricted stock units are not considered participating securities under ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share,” and are not included in the calculation of basic or diluted earnings per share.
21
On April 1, 2015, 8,616 shares of common stock were issued with respect to 8,616 restricted stock units which were granted on July 27, 2012 and vested on March 31, 2015. If and to the extent specified performance criteria have been achieved, the restricted stock units granted on April 10, 2013 will vest on March 31, 2016, the restricted stock units granted on September 8, 2014 (except for one grant) will vest on March 31, 2017, one grant of restricted stock units granted on September 8, 2014 will vest on March 31, 2018 and the restricted stock units granted on May 29, 2015 under the 2015 LTIP will vest on March 31, 2018.
Compensation cost is measured as an amount equal to the fair value of the restricted stock units on the date of grant and is expensed over the vesting period if achievement of the performance criteria is deemed probable, with the amount of the expense recognized based on our best estimate of the ultimate achievement level. The grant date fair value of the restricted stock units granted in 2012 and 2013 is $9.20 per unit. The grant date fair value of the restricted stock units granted in 2014 is $9.66 per unit. The grant date fair value of the restricted stock units granted in 2015 is $11.10 per unit. We incurred a benefit to compensation expense of $49 thousand related to restricted stock units during the three months ended September 30, 2015. We incurred compensation expense of $408 thousand related to restricted stock units during the nine months ended September 30, 2015. We incurred a benefit to compensation expense of $170 thousand and $46 thousand related to the restricted stock units during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014. We recorded an income tax (benefit) expense of ($17) thousand and $143 thousand related to restricted stock units during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015. We recorded an income tax expense of $59 thousand and $16 thousand related to restricted stock units during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014.
A summary of the status of our restricted stock units as of September 30, 2015 and changes during the nine months then ended is presented below:
Number of | ||||
Restricted | ||||
Stock Units | ||||
Non-vested at January 1, 2015 | 285,216 | |||
Granted | 102,971 | |||
Vested | (8,616 | ) | ||
Forfeited | (83,380 | ) | ||
Non-vested at September 30, 2015 | 296,191 |
As of September 30, 2015, there was $1.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock units granted under our 2005 LTIP and 2015 LTIP, of which $184 thousand is expected to be recognized during the remainder of 2015, $723 thousand is expected to be recognized in 2016, $587 thousand is expected to be recognized in 2017 and $136 thousand is expected to be recognized in 2018.
22
9. Segment Information
The following is business segment information for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||
Standard Commercial Segment | $ | 18,477 | $ | 20,985 | $ | 58,941 | $ | 60,667 | ||||||||
Specialty Commercial Segment | 63,395 | 57,983 | 188,070 | 179,167 | ||||||||||||
Personal Segment | 12,716 | 4,225 | 33,096 | 14,699 | ||||||||||||
Corporate | (904 | ) | (1,776 | ) | 2,224 | (5,171 | ) | |||||||||
Consolidated | $ | 93,684 | $ | 81,417 | $ | 282,331 | $ | 249,362 | ||||||||
Pre-tax income (loss): | ||||||||||||||||
Standard Commercial Segment | $ | 2,893 | $ | 2,244 | $ | 7,247 | $ | 318 | ||||||||
Specialty Commercial Segment | 11,291 | 7,653 | 28,739 | 27,042 | ||||||||||||
Personal Segment | (224 | ) | 662 | (596 | ) | 1,916 | ||||||||||
Corporate | (4,125 | ) | (5,831 | ) | (8,591 | ) | (16,094 | ) | ||||||||
Consolidated | $ | 9,835 | $ | 4,728 | $ | 26,799 | $ | 13,182 |
The following is additional business segment information as of the dates indicated (in thousands):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Standard Commercial Segment | $ | 153,606 | $ | 145,355 | ||||
Specialty Commercial Segment | 637,729 | 590,852 | ||||||
Personal Segment | 236,218 | 222,183 | ||||||
Corporate | 21,107 | 22,479 | ||||||
$ | 1,048,660 | $ | 980,869 |
10. Reinsurance
We reinsure a portion of the risk we underwrite in order to control the exposure to losses and to protect capital resources. We cede to reinsurers a portion of these risks and pay premiums based upon the risk and exposure of the policies subject to such reinsurance. Ceded reinsurance involves credit risk and is generally subject to aggregate loss limits. Although the reinsurer is liable to us to the extent of the reinsurance ceded, we are ultimately liable as the direct insurer on all risks reinsured. Reinsurance recoverables are reported after allowances for uncollectible amounts. We monitor the financial condition of reinsurers on an ongoing basis and review our reinsurance arrangements periodically. Reinsurers are selected based on their financial condition, business practices and the price of their product offerings. In order to mitigate credit risk to reinsurance companies, most of our reinsurance recoverable balance as of September 30, 2015 was with reinsurers that had an A.M. Best rating of “A–” or better.
23
The following table shows earned premiums ceded and reinsurance loss recoveries by period (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
Ceded earned premiums | $ | 38,435 | $ | 37,360 | $ | 105,367 | $ | 105,594 | ||||||||
Reinsurance recoveries | $ | 23,507 | $ | 25,785 | $ | 66,796 | $ | 74,302 |
11. Revolving Credit Facility
Our Second Restated Credit Agreement with The Frost National Bank (“Frost”) dated June 30, 2015, reinstates the credit facility with Frost which expired by its terms on April 30, 2015. The Second Restated Credit Agreement also amends certain provisions of the credit facility and restates the agreement with Frost in its entirety. The Second Restated Credit Agreement provides a $15.0 million revolving credit facility, with a $5.0 million letter of credit sub-facility. The outstanding balance of the revolving credit facility bears interest at a rate equal to the prime rate or LIBOR plus 2.5%, at our election. We pay an annual fee of 0.25% of the average daily unused balance of the credit facility and letter of credit fees at the rate of 1.00% per annum. The revolving credit facility contains covenants that, among other things, require us to maintain certain financial and operating ratios and restrict certain distributions, transactions and organizational changes. As of September 30, 2015, we were in compliance with all of our covenants and had no outstanding borrowings under this revolving credit facility.
12. Subordinated Debt Securities
On June 21, 2005, we entered into a trust preferred securities transaction pursuant to which we issued $30.9 million aggregate principal amount of subordinated debt securities due in 2035. To effect the transaction, we formed Trust I as a Delaware statutory trust. Trust I issued $30.0 million of preferred securities to investors and $0.9 million of common securities to us. Trust I used the proceeds from these issuances to purchase the subordinated debt securities. The initial interest rate on our Trust I subordinated debt securities was 7.25% until June 15, 2015, after which interest adjusts quarterly to the three-month LIBOR rate plus 3.25 percentage points. Trust I pays dividends on its preferred securities at the same rate. Under the terms of our Trust I subordinated debt securities, we pay interest only each quarter and the principal of the note at maturity. The subordinated debt securities are uncollaterized and do not require maintenance of minimum financial covenants. As of September 30, 2015, the balance of our Trust I subordinated debt was $30.9 million and the interest rate was 3.59% per annum.
On August 23, 2007, we entered into a trust preferred securities transaction pursuant to which we issued $25.8 million aggregate principal amount of subordinated debt securities due in 2037. To effect the transaction, we formed Trust II as a Delaware statutory trust. Trust II issued $25.0 million of preferred securities to investors and $0.8 million of common securities to us. Trust II used the proceeds from these issuances to purchase the subordinated debt securities. Our Trust II subordinated debt securities bear an initial interest rate of 8.28% until September 15, 2017, at which time interest will adjust quarterly to the three-month LIBOR rate plus 2.90 percentage points. Trust II pays dividends on its preferred securities at the same rate. Under the terms of our Trust II subordinated debt securities, we pay interest only each quarter and the principal of the note at maturity. The subordinated debt securities are uncollaterized and do not require maintenance of minimum financial covenants. As of September 30, 2015, the balance of our Trust II subordinated debt was $25.8 million.
24
13. Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
The following table shows total deferred and amortized policy acquisition cost activity by period (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
Deferred | $ | (10,977 | ) | $ | 3,873 | $ | (18,698 | ) | $ | (19,749 | ) | |||||
Amortized | 11,177 | (4,782 | ) | 18,334 | 21,670 | |||||||||||
Net | $ | 200 | $ | (909 | ) | $ | (364 | ) | $ | 1,921 |
14. Earnings per Share
The following table sets forth basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding for the periods indicated (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
Weighted average shares - basic | 19,203 | 19,181 | 19,233 | 19,227 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities | 179 | 168 | 182 | 137 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average shares - assuming dilution | 19,382 | 19,349 | 19,415 | 19,364 |
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, 504,999 shares of common stock potentially issuable upon the exercise of employee stock options were excluded from the weighted average number of shares outstanding on a diluted basis because the effect of such options would be anti-dilutive. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, 715,832 shares of common stock potentially issuable upon the exercise of employee stock options were excluded from the weighted average number of shares outstanding on a diluted basis because the effect of such options would be anti-dilutive.
25
15. Net Periodic Pension Cost
The following table details the net periodic pension cost incurred by period (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
Interest cost | $ | 129 | $ | 133 | $ | 388 | $ | 399 | ||||||||
Amortization of net loss | 26 | 41 | 78 | 122 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (175 | ) | (175 | ) | (526 | ) | (524 | ) | ||||||||
Net periodic pension cost | $ | (20 | ) | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (60 | ) | $ | (3 | ) | ||||
Contributed amount | $ | - | $ | 299 | $ | - | $ | 533 |
Refer to Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 for more discussion of our retirement plans.
16. Income Taxes
Our effective income tax rate for the first nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 was 31.3% and 26.7%, respectively. The rates varied from the statutory tax rate primarily due to the amount of tax exempt income in relation to pre-tax income.
17. Commitments and Contingencies
We are engaged in various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, none of which, either individually or in the aggregate, are believed likely to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations, in the opinion of management. The various legal proceedings to which we are a party are routine in nature and incidental to our business.
During the third quarter of 2015 we paid $1.2 million in fulfillment of the contingent purchase price with the sellers of TBIC Holding. The sellers have disputed the calculation of the amount paid and assert that an additional $1.8 million is due. We disagree with this assertion and are in discussions with the Sellers in regards to a potential resolution.
26
18. Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Balances
The changes in accumulated other comprehensive income balances as of September 30, 2015 and 2014 were as follows (in thousands):
Minimum | Accumulated Other | |||||||||||
Pension | Unrealized | Comprehensive | ||||||||||
Liability | Gains (Loss) | Income | ||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2013 | $ | (1,480 | ) | $ | 18,363 | $ | 16,883 | |||||
Other comprehensive income : | ||||||||||||
Change in net actuarial gain | 122 | - | 122 | |||||||||
Tax effect on change in net actuarial gain | (43 | ) | - | (43 | ) | |||||||
Net unrealized holding gains arising during the period | - | 1,900 | 1,900 | |||||||||
Tax effect on unrealized gains arising during the period | - | (665 | ) | (665 | ) | |||||||
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net realized gains | - | 122 | 122 | |||||||||
Tax effect on reclassification adjustment for losses included in income tax expense | - | (43 | ) | (43 | ) | |||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax | 79 | 1,314 | 1,393 | |||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2014 | $ | (1,401 | ) | $ | 19,677 | $ | 18,276 | |||||
Balance at December 31, 2014 | $ | (2,600 | ) | $ | 20,401 | $ | 17,801 | |||||
Other comprehensive income : | ||||||||||||
Change in net actuarial gain | 78 | - | 78 | |||||||||
Tax effect on change in net actuarial gain | (27 | ) | - | (27 | ) | |||||||
Net unrealized holding losses arising during the period | - | (7,858 | ) | (7,858 | ) | |||||||
Tax effect on unrealized losses arising during the period | - | 2,750 | 2,750 | |||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net realized gains | - | (5,881 | ) | (5,881 | ) | |||||||
Tax effect on reclassification adjustment for gains included in income tax expense | - | 2,058 | 2,058 | |||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | 51 | (8,931 | ) | (8,880 | ) | |||||||
Balance at September 30, 2015 | $ | (2,549 | ) | $ | 11,470 | $ | 8,921 |
27
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto. This discussion contains forward-looking statements. Please see “Risks Associated with Forward-Looking Statements in this Form 10-Q” for a discussion of some of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these statements.
Introduction
Hallmark Financial Services, Inc. (“Hallmark” and, together with subsidiaries, “we,” “us” or “our”) is an insurance holding company that, through its subsidiaries, engages in the sale of property/casualty insurance products to businesses and individuals. Our business involves marketing, distributing, underwriting and servicing our insurance products, as well as providing other insurance related services. Our business is geographically concentrated in the south central and northwest regions of the United States, except for our Specialty Commercial business which is written on a national basis. We pursue our business activities through subsidiaries whose operations are organized into product-specific operating units, which are supported by our insurance company subsidiaries.
Our non-carrier insurance activities are segregated by operating units into the following reportable segments:
· | Standard Commercial Segment. Our Standard Commercial Segment includes the standard lines commercial property/casualty and occupational accident insurance products and services handled by our Standard Commercial P&C operating unit and the workers compensation insurance products handled by our Workers Compensation operating unit. Effective July 1, 2015, the Workers Compensation operating unit no longer retains any risk on new or renewal policies. |
· | Specialty Commercial Segment. Our Specialty Commercial Segment includes the excess and surplus lines commercial property/casualty insurance products and services handled by our MGA Commercial Products operating unit and the general aviation, satellite launch, commercial umbrella and primary/excess liability, medical professional liability and primary/excess commercial property insurance products and services handled by our Specialty Commercial operating unit, as well as certain specialty risk programs which are managed at the parent level. |
· | Personal Segment. Our Personal Segment includes the non-standard personal automobile and renters insurance products and services handled by our Specialty Personal Lines operating unit. During the fourth quarter of 2014, our Specialty Personal Lines operating unit discontinued the low value dwelling/homeowners and manufactured homes insurance products it previously offered. |
The retained premium produced by these reportable segments is supported by our American Hallmark Insurance Company of Texas (“AHIC”), Hallmark Specialty Insurance Company (“HSIC”), Hallmark Insurance Company (“HIC”), Hallmark National Insurance Company (“HNIC”) and Texas Builders Insurance Company (“TBIC”) insurance subsidiaries. In addition, control and management of Hallmark County Mutual (“HCM”) is maintained through our wholly owned subsidiary, CYR Insurance Management Company (“CYR”). CYR has as its primary asset a management agreement with HCM which provides for CYR to have management and control of HCM. HCM is used to front certain lines of business in our Specialty Commercial and Personal Segments in Texas. HCM does not retain any business.
28
AHIC, HIC, HSIC and HNIC have entered into a pooling arrangement pursuant to which AHIC retains 30% of the total net premiums written by any of them, HIC retains 27% of our total net premiums written by any of them, HSIC retains 30% of our total net premiums written by any of them and HNIC retains 13% of our total premiums written by any of them. Neither HCM nor TBIC is a party to the intercompany pooling arrangement.
Results of Operations
Management overview. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, our total revenues were $93.7 million and $282.3 million, representing an increase of 15% and 13%, respectively, from the $81.4 million and $249.4 million in total revenues for the same periods of 2014. This increase in revenue was primarily attributable to higher net premiums earned, higher realized gains recognized on our investment portfolio during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, lower adverse profit share commission revenue adjustments in our Standard Commercial Segment and higher net investment income. The increased net earned premiums were primarily attributable to increased retained premium under a renewed quota share reinsurance agreement effective October 1, 2014 in our Personal Segment and increased premium production in our Personal Segment and in our MGA Commercial Products operating unit.
The increase in revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 was partially offset by increased loss and loss adjustment expenses (“LAE”) of $5.5 million and $16.0 million, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2014. The increase in loss and LAE was primarily the result of an increase in retained losses in our Personal Segment under the renewed quota share reinsurance agreement discussed above and higher current accident year loss trends in our Specialty Commercial Segment. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, we recorded favorable prior year net loss reserve development of $4.6 million and $5.4 million, respectively. Also partially offsetting the increased revenue was increased other operating expenses due mostly to higher production related expenses in our Personal Segment due to the impact of the change in terms of the quota share reinsurance agreement referenced above and increased salary and related expenses in our Specialty Commercial and Corporate Segments.
We reported net income of $6.7 million and $18.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to net income of $3.5 million and $9.7 million for the same periods of 2014. On a diluted basis per share, we reported net income of $0.35 per share for the three months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to net income of $0.18 per share for the same period in 2014. On a diluted basis per share, we reported net income of $0.95 per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to net income of $0.50 per share for the same period in 2014.
29
Third Quarter 2015 as Compared to Third Quarter 2014
The following is additional business segment information for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended September 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Standard | Specialty | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Segment | Commercial Segment | Personal Segment | Corporate | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross premiums written | $ | 19,225 | $ | 20,850 | $ | 91,446 | $ | 87,886 | $ | 21,470 | $ | 13,987 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 132,141 | $ | 122,723 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Ceded premiums written | (4,145 | ) | (1,639 | ) | (28,205 | ) | (25,534 | ) | (9,867 | ) | (11,525 | ) | - | - | (42,217 | ) | (38,698 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net premiums written | 15,080 | 19,211 | 63,241 | 62,352 | 11,603 | 2,462 | - | - | 89,924 | 84,025 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unearned premiums | 2,087 | 614 | (2,909 | ) | (7,736 | ) | (696 | ) | 244 | - | - | (1,518 | ) | (6,878 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net premiums earned | 17,167 | 19,825 | 60,332 | 54,616 | 10,907 | 2,706 | - | - | 88,406 | 77,147 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues | 18,477 | 20,985 | 63,395 | 57,983 | 12,716 | 4,225 | (904 | ) | (1,776 | ) | 93,684 | 81,417 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Losses and loss adjustment expenses | 10,088 | 12,545 | 36,186 | 36,844 | 9,731 | 1,120 | - | - | 56,005 | 50,509 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-tax income (loss) | 2,893 | 2,244 | 11,291 | 7,653 | (224 | ) | 662 | (4,125 | ) | (5,831 | ) | 9,835 | 4,728 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss ratio (1) | 58.8 | % | 63.3 | % | 60.0 | % | 67.5 | % | 89.2 | % | 41.4 | % | 63.3 | % | 65.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net expense ratio (1) | 32.2 | % | 32.1 | % | 26.1 | % | 25.7 | % | 16.1 | % | 57.9 | % | 27.7 | % | 30.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net combined ratio (1) | 91.0 | % | 95.4 | % | 86.1 | % | 93.2 | % | 105.3 | % | 99.3 | % | 91.0 | % | 96.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Favorable (Unfavorable) Prior Year Development | 1,821 | (288 | ) | 2,048 | (2,369 | ) | (783 | ) | 1,205 | 3,086 | (1,452 | ) |
(1) The net loss ratio is calculated as incurred losses and LAE divided by net premiums earned, each determined in accordance with GAAP. The net expense ratio is calculated as total underwriting expenses offset by agency fee income divided by net premiums earned, each determined in accordance with GAAP. Net combined ratio is calculated as the sum of the net loss ratio and the net expense ratio.
Standard Commercial Segment
Gross premiums written for the Standard Commercial Segment were $19.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015, which was $1.6 million, or 8%, less than the $20.8 million reported for the same period in 2014. The decrease in gross premium was primarily due to lower premium production in our Workers Compensation operating unit due to the renewal rights agreement entered into during the second quarter of 2015 and subsequently amended during the third quarter of 2015 to cede 100% of the unearned premium effective July 1, 2015. Net premiums written were $15.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to $19.2 million reported for the same period in 2014. The lower net premiums written were primarily due to the workers compensation renewal rights agreement.
Total revenue for the Standard Commercial Segment of $18.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015, was $2.5 million, or 12%, less than the $21.0 million reported for the same period in 2014. This decrease in total revenue was due primarily to a $2.7 million decrease in net premiums earned as a result of the workers compensation renewal rights agreement and an increase in ceded premium in our Standard Commercial P&C operating unit, as well as lower net investment income of $0.2 million, partially offset by a $0.4 million gain recorded during the third quarter of 2015 on the amendment of the workers compensation renewal rights agreement.
30
Our Standard Commercial Segment reported pre-tax income of $2.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 which was $0.7 million, or 29%, more than the $2.2 million reported for the same period of 2014. Lower loss and LAE of $2.5 million was the primary driver for the higher pre-tax income, as well as lower operating expenses of $0.7 million, partially offset by the decreased revenue discussed above.
The Standard Commercial Segment reported a net loss ratio of 58.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to 63.3% for the same period of 2014. The gross loss ratio before reinsurance for the three months ended September 30, 2015 was 55.3% as compared to the 70.0% reported for the same period of 2014. The decrease in the gross and net loss ratios was driven by lower current accident year loss trends during the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the same period during 2014. The Standard Commercial Segment reported favorable prior year reserve development of $1.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to unfavorable prior year reserve development of $0.3 million during the same period of 2014.
Specialty Commercial Segment
Gross premiums written for the Specialty Commercial Segment were $91.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015, which was $3.5 million, or 4%, more than the $87.9 million reported for the same period of 2014. Net premiums written were $63.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to $62.4 million for the same period of 2014. The increase in gross and net premiums was primarily due to increased production in both our MGA Commercial Products and Specialty Commercial operating units.
The $63.4 million of total revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2015 was $5.4 million more than the $58.0 million reported by the Specialty Commercial Segment for the same period in 2014. This increase in revenue was primarily due to higher net premiums earned of $5.7 million due primarily from increased production, partially offset by lower net investment income of $0.3 million.
Pre-tax income for the Specialty Commercial Segment of $11.3 million for the third quarter of 2015 was $3.6 million higher than the $7.7 million reported for the same period in 2014. The increase in pre-tax income was primarily the result of the increased revenue discussed above and lower loss and LAE expenses of $0.7 million. These increases to pre-tax income were partially offset by higher operating expenses of $2.5 million.
Our MGA Commercial Products operating unit reported a $0.4 million decrease in loss and LAE due primarily to $1.6 million favorable prior year net loss reserve development recognized during the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to $2.3 million unfavorable prior year net loss reserve development during the same period during 2014. Our Specialty Commercial operating unit reported a $0.2 million decrease in loss and LAE which consisted of (a) a $0.4 million decrease in loss and LAE due primarily to improved current accident year loss trends in our commercial umbrella and primary/excess liability line of business, and (b) a $0.4 million decrease in loss and LAE attributable to our general aviation and satellite launch insurance products due to lower current accident year loss trends, partially offset by (c) a $0.6 million increase in loss and LAE attributable to our medical professional liability insurance products. The increase of $2.4 million in operating expense was the combined result of increased production related expenses of $1.2 million, increased salary and related expenses of $0.7 million, higher other operating expenses of $0.2 million, higher professional service fees of $0.2 million and higher travel related expenses of $0.1 million.
31
The Specialty Commercial Segment reported a net loss ratio of 60.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to 67.5% for the same period during 2014. The gross loss ratio before reinsurance was 59.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to 65.8% for the same period in 2014. The lower gross and net loss ratios were primarily the result of $2.0 million favorable prior years’ net loss reserve development recognized for the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to $2.4 million unfavorable prior years’ net loss reserve development for the same period of 2014 and lower current accident year loss trends in our general aviation and satellite launch insurance products, partially offset by higher current accident year loss trends in our MGA Commercial Products operating unit.
Personal Segment
Gross premiums written for the Personal Segment were $21.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015, which was $7.5 million, or 53%, more than the $14.0 million reported for the same period in 2014. Net premiums written for our Personal Segment were $11.6 million in the third quarter of 2015, which was an increase of $9.1 million, or 371%, from the $2.5 million reported for the third quarter of 2014. The increase in the gross premiums written was due mostly to increased production in our ongoing core states. The increase in net premium written was due mostly to increased retained premium under a renewed quota share reinsurance agreement effective October 1, 2014.
Total revenue for the Personal Segment increased 201% to $12.7 million for the third quarter of 2015 from $4.2 million for the third quarter of 2014. Increased net premiums earned of $8.2 million and increased finance charges of $0.4 million were the primary reasons for the increase in revenue for the period, partially offset by decreased net investment income of $0.1 million.
Pre-tax loss for the Personal Segment was $0.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to pre-tax income of $0.7 million for the same period of 2014. The pre-tax loss was the result of increased losses and LAE of $8.6 million and increased operating expenses of $0.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the same period during 2014, partially offset by the increased revenue discussed above.
The Personal Segment reported a net loss ratio of 89.2% for the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to 41.4% for the same period of 2014. The gross loss ratio before reinsurance was 81.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to 67.7% for the same period in 2014. The higher gross and net loss ratios were primarily the result of $0.8 million of unfavorable prior year net loss reserve development for the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to $1.2 million of favorable development for the same period in the prior year. The Personal Segment reported a net expense ratio of 16.1% for the third quarter of 2015 as compared to 57.9% for the same period of 2014. The decrease in the expense ratio was due predominately to the impact of the change in terms of the quota share reinsurance agreement referenced above.
Corporate
Total revenue for Corporate increased by $0.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the same period the prior year. This increase in total revenue was due to higher net investment income of $1.2 million, partially offset by net realized losses recognized on our investment portfolio of $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015.
32
Corporate pre-tax loss was $4.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to pre-tax loss of $5.8 million for the same period of 2014. The improvement in pre-tax loss was primarily due to the increased revenue discussed above and lower operating expenses of $0.4 million as a result of lower professional service fees. Further contributing to the decline in pre-tax loss was lower interest expense of $0.4 million due to the lower floating interest rate effective June 15, 2015 on our Trust I subordinated debt securities. (See, “Financial Condition and Liquidity- Subordinated Debt Securities.”)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 as Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
The following is additional business segment information for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):
Nine Months Ended September 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Standard | Specialty | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Segment | Commercial Segment | Personal Segment | Corporate | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross premiums written | $ | 63,710 | $ | 64,477 | $ | 263,103 | $ | 248,615 | $ | 63,895 | $ | 50,153 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 390,708 | $ | 363,245 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Ceded premiums written | (8,178 | ) | (5,870 | ) | (78,804 | ) | (75,260 | ) | (29,123 | ) | (41,466 | ) | - | - | (116,105 | ) | (122,596 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net premiums written | 55,532 | 58,607 | 184,299 | 173,355 | 34,772 | 8,687 | - | - | 274,603 | 240,649 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unearned premiums | 273 | 56 | (4,717 | ) | (4,066 | ) | (6,581 | ) | 1,131 | - | - | (11,025 | ) | (2,879 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net premiums earned | 55,805 | 58,663 | 179,582 | 169,289 | 28,191 | 9,818 | - | - | 263,578 | 237,770 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues | 58,941 | 60,667 | 188,070 | 179,167 | 33,096 | 14,699 | 2,224 | (5,171 | ) | 282,331 | 249,362 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Losses and loss adjustment expenses | 33,938 | 41,497 | 113,168 | 109,027 | 24,714 | 5,257 | - | - | 171,820 | 155,781 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-tax income (loss) | 7,247 | 318 | 28,739 | 27,042 | (596 | ) | 1,916 | (8,591 | ) | (16,094 | ) | 26,799 | 13,182 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss ratio (1) | 60.8 | % | 70.7 | % | 63.0 | % | 64.4 | % | 87.7 | % | 53.5 | % | 65.2 | % | 65.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net expense ratio (1) | 32.6 | % | 32.6 | % | 25.7 | % | 25.8 | % | 19.4 | % | 44.9 | % | 28.2 | % | 30.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net combined ratio (1) | 93.4 | % | 103.3 | % | 88.7 | % | 90.2 | % | 107.1 | % | 98.4 | % | 93.4 | % | 95.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Favorable (Unfavorable) Prior Year Development | 4,719 | 4,847 | 1,852 | (2,600 | ) | (2,009 | ) | 3,112 | 4,562 | 5,359 |
(1) The net loss ratio is calculated as incurred losses and LAE divided by net premiums earned, each determined in accordance with GAAP. The net expense ratio is calculated as total underwriting expenses offset by agency fee income divided by net premiums earned, each determined in accordance with GAAP. Net combined ratio is calculated as the sum of the net loss ratio and the net expense ratio.
Standard Commercial Segment
Gross premiums written for the Standard Commercial Segment were $63.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, which was $0.8 million, or 1%, less than the $64.5 million reported for the same period in 2014. The decrease in gross premium was primarily due to lower premium production in our Workers Compensation operating unit due to the renewal rights agreement entered into during the second quarter of 2015 and subsequently amended during the third quarter of 2015 to cede 100% of the unearned premium effective July 1, 2015. Net premiums written were $55.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to $58.6 million reported for the same period in 2014. The lower net premiums were primarily due to the workers compensation renewal rights agreement.
33
Total revenue for the Standard Commercial Segment of $58.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $1.8 million less than the $60.7 million reported during the same period in 2014. This 3% decrease in total revenue was mostly due to a $2.9 million decrease in net premiums earned as a result of the workers compensation renewal rights agreement and lower net premiums earned in our Standard Commercial P&C operating unit, as well as lower net investment income of $1.0 million, partially offset by a decreased adverse profit share commission revenue adjustment of $1.5 million and a $0.6 million gain on the sale of our workers compensation renewal rights.
Our Standard Commercial Segment reported pre-tax income of $7.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to pre-tax income of $0.3 million for the same period of 2014. Lower loss and LAE of $7.6 million was the primary driver for the higher pre-tax income, as well as lower operating expenses of $1.1 million, partially offset by the decreased revenue discussed above.
The Standard Commercial Segment reported a net loss ratio of 60.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to 70.7% for the same period in 2014. The gross loss ratio before reinsurance for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was 59.4% as compared to the 76.0% reported for the same period of 2014. The improvement in the gross and net loss ratios was driven primarily by lower current accident year losses mostly due to lower net catastrophe losses. The gross and net loss ratios for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 included $4.2 million of catastrophe related losses compared to $12.5 million of net catastrophe related losses for the same period the prior year. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 the Standard Commercial Segment reported $4.7 million of favorable loss development as compared to $4.8 million reported for the same period of 2014.
Specialty Commercial Segment
Gross premiums written for the Specialty Commercial Segment were $263.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, which was $14.5 million, or 6%, more than the $248.6 million reported for the same period in 2014. Net premiums written were $184.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to $173.4 million reported for the same period in 2014. The increase in gross and net premiums written was due to increased premium production in both our MGA Commercial Products and our Specialty Commercial operating units.
The $188.1 million of total revenue for the Specialty Commercial Segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $8.9 million higher than the $179.2 million reported for 2014. This 5% increase in revenue was due to higher net premiums earned of $10.3 million due predominately to the increased production discussed above, partially offset by lower net investment income of $1.3 million and lower finance charges of $0.1 million.
Pre-tax income for the Specialty Commercial Segment of $28.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $1.7 million higher than the $27.0 million reported for the same period in 2014. The increase in pre-tax income was primarily the result of the increased revenue discussed above, partially offset by higher loss and LAE expenses of $4.1 million and higher operating expenses of $3.1 million.
Our MGA Commercial Products operating unit reported a $4.6 million increase in loss and LAE due primarily to higher current accident year loss trends as well as increased premium production. Our Specialty Commercial operating unit reported a $0.5 million decrease in loss and LAE which consisted of (a) a $2.0 million decrease in loss and LAE in our general aviation and satellite launch insurance products due primarily to $0.7 million of favorable prior year loss reserve development recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to $0.7 million of adverse prior year loss reserve development recognized for the same period the prior year, (b) a $0.4 million increase in loss and LAE due primarily to $0.6 million lower favorable prior year net loss reserve development recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the same period during 2014 in our commercial umbrella and primary/excess liability line of business, and (c) a $1.1 million increase in loss and LAE attributable to our medical professional liability insurance products. The increase of $3.1 million in operating expense was the combined result of the year to date expenses to start up our primary/excess property coverage business of $1.4 million, increased salary and related expenses of $0.5 million, higher production related expenses of $0.8 million, increased professional service fees of $0.3 million, and higher travel related expenses of $0.1 million.
34
The Specialty Commercial Segment reported a gross and net loss ratio of 63.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The Specialty Commercial Segment reported gross and net loss ratios of 64.3% and 64.4%, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The lower gross and net loss ratios for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 were primarily the result of favorable loss reserve development of $1.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to unfavorable loss reserve development of $2.6 million for the same period of 2014, partially offset by higher current accident year loss trends.
Personal Segment
Gross premiums written for the Personal Segment were $63.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, which was $13.7 million, or 27%, more than the $50.2 million reported for the same period in 2014. Net premiums written for our Personal Segment were $34.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, which was an increase of $26.1 million, or 300%, from the $8.7 million reported for the same period of 2014. The increase in the gross premiums written was due mostly to increased production in our ongoing core states. The increase in net premium written was due mostly to increased retained premium under a renewed quota share reinsurance agreement effective October 1, 2014.
Total revenue for the Personal Segment increased 125% to $33.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 from $14.7 million for the same period during 2014. Increased net premiums earned of $18.4 million and higher finance charges of $0.4 million were the primary reasons for the increase in revenue for the period, partially offset by decreased net investment income of $0.4 million.
Pre-tax loss for the Personal Segment was $0.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to pre-tax income of $1.9 million for the same period of 2014. The pre-tax loss was the result of increased losses and LAE of $19.4 million and increased operating expenses of $1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the same period during 2014, partially offset by the increased revenue discussed above.
The Personal Segment reported a net loss ratio of 87.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to 53.5% for the same period of 2014. The gross loss ratio before reinsurance was 79.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to 69.7% for the same period in 2014. The higher gross and net loss ratios were primarily the result of unfavorable prior year net loss reserve development of $2.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to favorable development of $3.1 million for the same period in the prior year, partially offset by lower current accident year loss trends. The Personal Segment reported a net expense ratio of 19.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to 44.9% for the same period of 2014. The decrease in the expense ratio was due predominately to the impact of the change in terms of the quota share reinsurance agreement referenced above.
35
Corporate
Total revenue for Corporate increased by $7.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the same period the prior year. This increase in total revenue was due to higher net investment income of $3.6 million and net realized gains on our investment portfolio of $3.7 million recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to net realized losses on our investment portfolio of $0.1 million recognized for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.
Corporate pre-tax loss was $8.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to pre-tax loss of $16.1 million for the same period of 2014. The improvement in pre-tax loss was primarily due to the increased revenue discussed above and lower interest expense of $0.4 million due to the lower floating interest rate effective June 15, 2015 on our Trust I subordinated debt securities (See, “Financial Condition and Liquidity- Subordinated Debt Securities.”). This improvement in pre-tax loss was partially offset by higher operating expenses of $0.3 million primarily as a result of higher salary and related costs of $0.5 million, a $0.2 million increase in the earn-out paid in conjunction with the previous acquisition of TBIC, partially offset by lower professional service fees of $0.3 million and lower travel and related expenses of $0.1 million.
Financial Condition and Liquidity
Sources and Uses of Funds
Our sources of funds are from insurance-related operations, financing activities and investing activities. Major sources of funds from operations include premiums collected (net of policy cancellations and premiums ceded), commissions, and processing and service fees. As a holding company, Hallmark is dependent on dividend payments and management fees from its subsidiaries to meet operating expenses and debt obligations. As of September 30, 2015, Hallmark had $9.5 million in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents at the holding company. Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of our non-insurance subsidiaries were $4.7 million as of September 30, 2015. As of that date, our insurance subsidiaries held $78.8 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents as well as $519.2 million in debt securities with an average modified duration of 3.0 years. Accordingly, we do not anticipate selling long-term debt instruments to meet any liquidity needs.
AHIC and TBIC, domiciled in Texas, are limited in the payment of dividends to their stockholders in any 12-month period, without the prior written consent of the Texas Department of Insurance, to the greater of statutory net income for the prior calendar year or 10% of statutory policyholders’ surplus as of the prior year end. Dividends may only be paid from unassigned surplus funds. HIC and HNIC, both domiciled in Arizona, are limited in the payment of dividends to the lesser of 10% of prior year policyholders’ surplus or prior year's net investment income, without prior written approval from the Arizona Department of Insurance. HSIC, domiciled in Oklahoma, is limited in the payment of dividends to the greater of 10% of prior year policyholders’ surplus or prior year’s statutory net income, not including realized capital gains, without prior written approval from the Oklahoma Insurance Department. During 2015, the aggregate ordinary dividend capacity of these subsidiaries is $24.3 million, of which $16.2 million is available to Hallmark. As a county mutual, dividends from HCM are payable to policyholders. During the first nine months of 2015 and 2014, respectively, our insurance company subsidiaries paid $6.0 million in dividends to Hallmark.
36
Comparison of September 30, 2015 to December 31, 2014
On a consolidated basis, our cash (excluding restricted cash) and investments at September 30, 2015 were $660.4 million compared to $638.2 million at December 31, 2014. Cash flow from operations and an increase in unsettled investment purchases were the primary reasons for this increase in unrestricted cash and investments.
Comparison of Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014
Net cash provided by our consolidated operating activities was $43.1 million for the first nine months of 2015 as compared to $21.7 million for the first nine months of 2014. The increase in operating cash flow was primarily due to increased premiums collected net of reinsurance due primarily to an increase in retained business, as well as lower net paid losses, partially offset by higher operating expenses and income taxes paid.
Net cash used in investing activities during the first nine months of 2015 was $78.5 million as compared to $0.5 million during the first nine months of 2014. The increase in cash used by investing activities during the first nine months of 2015 was comprised of an increase in purchases of debt and equity securities of $58.9 million, a decrease in maturities, sales and redemptions of investment securities of $15.4 million, an increase in purchases of property and equipment of $1.8 million and an increase in transfers from restricted cash of $1.9 million.
Cash used in financing activities during the first nine months of 2015 was $2.5 million as a result of $1.9 million related to the repurchase of our common stock and $1.2 million related to the contingent purchase price payment to the sellers of TBIC Holding, partially offset by $0.6 million related to proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options. Cash used in financing activities during the first nine months of 2014 was $2.9 million as a result of a $1.5 million repayment on our revolving credit facility and $1.4 million related to the repurchase of our common stock
Credit Facilities
Our Second Restated Credit Agreement with The Frost National Bank (“Frost”) dated June 30, 2015, reinstates the credit facility with Frost which expired by its terms on April 30, 2015. The Second Restated Credit Agreement also amends certain provisions of the credit facility and restates the agreement with Frost in its entirety. The Second Restated Credit Agreement provides a $15.0 million revolving credit facility, with a $5.0 million letter of credit sub-facility. The outstanding balance of the revolving credit facility bears interest at a rate equal to the prime rate or LIBOR plus 2.5%, at our election. We pay an annual fee of 0.25% of the average daily unused balance of the credit facility and letter of credit fees at the rate of 1.00% per annum. The revolving credit facility contains covenants that, among other things, require us to maintain certain financial and operating ratios and restrict certain distributions, transactions and organizational changes. As of September 30, 2015, we were in compliance with all of our covenants and had no outstanding borrowings under this revolving credit facility.
Subordinated Debt Securities
On June 21, 2005, we entered into a trust preferred securities transaction pursuant to which we issued $30.9 million aggregate principal amount of subordinated debt securities due in 2035. To effect the transaction, we formed a Delaware statutory trust, Hallmark Statutory Trust I (“Trust I”). Trust I issued $30.0 million of preferred securities to investors and $0.9 million of common securities to us. Trust I used the proceeds from these issuances to purchase the subordinated debt securities. The initial interest rate on our Trust I subordinated debt securities was 7.25% until June 15, 2015, after which interest adjusts quarterly to the three-month LIBOR rate plus 3.25 percentage points. Trust I pays dividends on its preferred securities at the same rate. Under the terms of our Trust I subordinated debt securities, we pay interest only each quarter and the principal of the note at maturity. The subordinated debt securities are uncollaterized and do not require maintenance of minimum financial covenants. As of September 30, 2015, the balance of our Trust I subordinated debt was $30.9 million and the interest rate was 3.59% per annum.
37
On August 23, 2007, we entered into a trust preferred securities transaction pursuant to which we issued $25.8 million aggregate principal amount of subordinated debt securities due in 2037. To effect the transaction, we formed a Delaware statutory trust, Hallmark Statutory Trust II (“Trust II”). Trust II issued $25.0 million of preferred securities to investors and $0.8 million of common securities to us. Trust II used the proceeds from these issuances to purchase the subordinated debt securities. Our Trust II subordinated debt securities bear an initial interest rate of 8.28% until September 15, 2017, at which time interest will adjust quarterly to the three-month LIBOR rate plus 2.90 percentage points. Trust II pays dividends on its preferred securities at the same rate. Under the terms of our Trust II subordinated debt securities, we pay interest only each quarter and the principal of the note at maturity. The subordinated debt securities are uncollaterized and do not require maintenance of minimum financial covenants. As of September 30, 2015, the balance of our Trust II subordinated debt was $25.8 million.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
There have been no material changes to the market risks discussed in Item 7A to Part II of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
The principal executive officer and principal financial officer of Hallmark have evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures and have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, such disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is timely recorded, processed, summarized and reported. The principal executive officer and principal financial officer also concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under such Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. During the most recent fiscal quarter, there have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Risks Associated with Forward-Looking Statements Included in this Form 10-Q
This Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created thereby. These statements include the plans and objectives of management for future operations, including plans and objectives relating to future growth of our business activities and availability of funds. The forward-looking statements included herein are based on current expectations that involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions, regulatory framework, weather-related events and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that our objectives and plans will be achieved.
38
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
We are engaged in various legal proceedings that are routine in nature and incidental to our business. None of these proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, are believed, in our opinion, to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or our results of operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
There have been no material changes to the risk factors discussed in Item 1A to Part I of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Our stock buyback program initially announced on April 18, 2008, authorized the repurchase of up to 1,000,000 shares of our common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions (the “Stock Repurchase Plan”). On January 24, 2011, we announced an increased authorization to repurchase up to an additional 3,000,000 shares. The Stock Repurchase Plan does not have an expiration date.
The following table furnishes information for purchases made pursuant to the Stock Repurchase Plan during the quarter ended September 30, 2015:
Cumulative Number | Maximum Number of | |||||||||||||||
Average | of Shares Purchased | Shares that May Yet | ||||||||||||||
Total Number of | Price Paid | as Part of Publicly | Be Purchased Under | |||||||||||||
Period | Shares Purchased | Per Share | Announced Plan | the Plan | ||||||||||||
July 1st-July 31st | 35,456 | $ | 11.56 | 1,908,388 | 2,091,612 | |||||||||||
August 1st- August 31st | 1,300 | $ | 11.27 | 1,909,688 | 2,090,312 | |||||||||||
September 1st- September 30th | 65,989 | $ | 11.43 | 1,975,677 | 2,024,323 |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
None.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
39
Item 6. Exhibits.
The following exhibits are filed herewith or incorporated herein by reference:
Exhibit Number |
Description | |
3(a) | Restated Articles of Incorporation of the registrant, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 [Registration No. 333-136414] filed September 8, 2006). | |
3(b) | Amended and Restated By-Laws of the registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 1, 2007). | |
31(a) |
Certification of principal executive officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a). | |
31(b) |
Certification of principal financial officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a). | |
32(a) | Certification of principal executive officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. | |
32(b) | Certification of principal financial officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. | |
101 INS+ | XBRL Instance Document. | |
101 SCH+ | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. | |
101 CAL+ | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. | |
101 LAB+ | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. | |
101 PRE+ | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. | |
101 DEF+ | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. | |
+ | Filed with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and included in Exhibit 101 to this report are the following documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Stockholder’s Equity for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 and (vi) related notes. |
40
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
HALLMARK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
(Registrant)
Date: November 5, 2015 | /s/ Naveen Anand | ||
Naveen Anand, Chief Executive Officer and President | |||
Date: November 5, 2015 | /s/ Jeffrey R. Passmore | ||
Jeffrey R. Passmore, Chief Accounting Officer and Senior Vice President |
41