e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 001-33059
FUEL TECH, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation of organization)
|
|
20-5657551
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
Fuel Tech, Inc.
27601 Bella Vista Parkway
Warrenville, IL 60555-1617
630-845-4500
(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of accelerated filer, large
accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o |
Accelerated filer þ |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of April 28, 2010 there were outstanding 24,213,467 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01
per share, of the registrant.
FUEL TECH, INC.
Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010
INDEX
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
FUEL TECH, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Note B) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
21,432 |
|
|
|
20,965 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$70 and $70, respectively |
|
|
19,918 |
|
|
|
17,877 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
|
2,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
45,167 |
|
|
|
42,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $15,050 and
$14,562, respectively |
|
|
14,925 |
|
|
|
15,549 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
21,051 |
|
|
|
21,051 |
|
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of
$3,036 and $2,817, respectively |
|
|
6,530 |
|
|
|
6,749 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
4,659 |
|
|
|
4,183 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
2,405 |
|
|
|
2,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
94,737 |
|
|
$ |
92,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
2,925 |
|
|
$ |
2,925 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
5,671 |
|
|
|
5,824 |
|
Accrued liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation |
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
3,427 |
|
|
|
2,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
12,764 |
|
|
|
11,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
2,221 |
|
|
|
2,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
14,985 |
|
|
|
14,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, 40,000,000 shares
authorized, 24,211,967 and 24,211,967 shares issued,
respectively |
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
126,838 |
|
|
|
125,458 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(47,614 |
) |
|
|
(47,828 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
Nil coupon perpetual loan notes |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
79,752 |
|
|
|
78,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
94,737 |
|
|
$ |
92,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
FUEL TECH, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
17,617 |
|
|
$ |
17,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
9,500 |
|
|
|
11,374 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
7,480 |
|
|
|
8,254 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,126 |
|
|
|
19,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income/(loss) |
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
(2,465 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Other (expense) |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(Loss) before taxes |
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
(2,603 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (expense)/benefit |
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
1,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
214 |
|
|
$ |
(1,562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) per Common Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of Common Shares
outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
24,212,000 |
|
|
|
24,112,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
24,431,000 |
|
|
|
24,112,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
FUEL TECH, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
685 |
|
|
$ |
6,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,490 |
) |
Decrease in restricted cash |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of equipment and patents |
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
(883 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(23,373 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from short-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Issuance of deferred shares |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
Redemption of nil coupon loan note |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
(16,833 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
20,965 |
|
|
|
28,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
21,432 |
|
|
$ |
11,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in contingent consideration payable |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,307 |
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
FUEL TECH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2010
(in thousands, except share and per-share data)
(Unaudited)
Note A: Nature of Business
Fuel Tech, Inc. (Fuel Tech or the Company) is a fully integrated company that uses a suite of
advanced technologies to provide boiler optimization, efficiency improvement and air pollution
reduction and control solutions to utility and industrial customers worldwide. Originally
incorporated in 1987 under the laws of the Netherlands Antilles as Fuel-Tech N.V., Fuel Tech became
domesticated in the United States on September 30, 2006, and continues as a Delaware corporation
with its corporate headquarters at 27601 Bella Vista Parkway, Warrenville, Illinois, 60555-1617.
Fuel Tech maintains an Internet website at www.ftek.com. Fuel Techs annual report on Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports
filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are made
available through our website as soon as reasonably practical after electronically filed or
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Also available on the Fuel Techs website are
the Companys Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, as well as
the charters of the Audit and Compensation & Nominating committees of the Board of Directors. All
of these documents are available in print without charge to stockholders who request them.
Information on our website is not incorporated into this report.
Fuel Techs special focus is the worldwide marketing of its nitrogen oxide (NOx) reduction and FUEL
CHEM® processes. The Air Pollution Control (APC) technology segment reduces NOx
emissions in flue gas from boilers, incinerators, furnaces and other stationary combustion sources
by utilizing combustion optimization techniques and Low NOx and Ultra Low NOx Burners; Over-Fire
Air systems, NOxOUT® and HERT High Energy Reagent Technology SNCR systems; systems
that incorporate ASCR (Advanced Selective Catalytic Reduction) technology including
CASCADE; ULTRA and NOxOUT-SCR® processes; and Ammonia
Injection Grids (AIG) and the Graduated Straightening Grid (GSG). The FUEL CHEM® technology
segment improves the efficiency, reliability and environmental status of combustion units by
controlling slagging, fouling and corrosion, as well as the formation of sulfur trioxide, ammonium
bisulfate, particulate matter (PM2.5), carbon dioxide, NOx and unburned carbon in fly
ash through the addition of chemicals into the fuel or via TIFI® Targeted In-Furnace Injection
programs. Fuel Tech has other technologies, both commercially available and in the development
stage, all of which are related to APC and FUEL CHEM technology segments or are similar in their
technological base. Fuel Techs business is materially dependent on the continued existence and
enforcement of worldwide air quality regulations.
Note B: Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited, condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with
the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include
all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments
(consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the
balance sheet and results of operations for the periods covered have been included and all
significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The results of operations
of all acquired businesses have been consolidated for all periods subsequent to the date of
acquisition.
The balance sheet at December 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited financial statements at
that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted
accounting principles for complete financial statements.
For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto
included in Fuel Techs Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
4
Note C: Revenue Recognition Policy
Revenues from the sales of chemical products are recorded when title transfers, either at the point
of shipment or at the point of destination, depending on the contract with the customer.
Fuel Tech uses the percentage of completion method of accounting for equipment construction and
license contracts that are sold within the APC technology segment. Under the percentage of
completion method, revenues are recognized as work is performed based on the relationship between
actual construction costs incurred and total estimated costs at completion. Revisions in completion
estimates and contract values in the period in which the facts giving rise to the revisions become
known can influence the timing of when revenues are recognized under the percentage of completion
method of accounting. Provisions are made for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts in the
period in which such losses are determined. As of March 31, 2010 the Company had one construction
contract in progress that was identified as a loss contract in the amount of $171.
Fuel Techs APC contracts are typically six to twelve months in length. A typical contract will
have three or four critical operational measurements that, when achieved, serve as the basis for us
to invoice the customer via progress billings. At a minimum, these measurements will include the
generation of engineering drawings, the shipment of equipment and the completion of a system
performance test.
As part of a majority of its contractual APC project agreements, Fuel Tech will agree to
customer-specific acceptance criteria that relate to the operational performance of the system that
is being sold. These criteria are determined based on mathematical modeling that is performed by
Fuel Tech personnel, which is based on operational inputs that are provided by the customer. The
customer will warrant that these operational inputs are accurate as they are specified in the
binding contractual agreement. Further, the customer is solely responsible for the accuracy of the
operating condition information; all performance guarantees and equipment warranties granted by us
are void if the operating condition information is inaccurate or is not met.
Fuel Tech has installed over 550 units with APC technology and has never failed to meet a
performance guarantee when the customer has provided the required operating conditions for the
project. As part of the project implementation process, we perform system start-up and optimization
services that effectively serve as a test of actual project performance. We believe that this test,
combined with the accuracy of the modeling that is performed, enables revenue to be recognized
prior to the receipt of formal customer acceptance.
Accounts receivable includes unbilled receivables, representing revenues recognized in excess of
billings on uncompleted contracts under the percentage of completion method of accounting. At March
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, unbilled receivables were approximately $7,963 and $8,466,
respectively. Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts were $672
and $373, at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Such amounts are included in other
accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.
Note
D: Cost of Sales
Cost of sales includes all internal and external engineering costs, equipment and chemical charges,
inbound and outbound freight expenses, internal and site transfer costs, installation charges,
purchasing and receiving costs, inspection costs, warehousing costs, project personnel travel
expenses and other direct and indirect expenses specifically identified as project- or product
line-related, as appropriate (e.g., test equipment depreciation and certain insurance expenses).
Certain depreciation and amortization expenses related to tangible and intangible assets,
respectively, are also allocated to cost of sales.
Note
E: Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses primarily include the following categories except
where an allocation to the cost of sales line item is warranted due to the project- or product-line
nature of a portion of the expense category: salaries and wages, employee benefits, non-project
travel, insurance, legal, rent, accounting and auditing, recruiting, telephony, employee training,
Board of Directors fees, auto rental, office supplies, dues and subscriptions, utilities, real
estate taxes, commissions and bonuses, marketing materials, postage and business taxes. Departments
comprising the selling, general and administrative line item primarily include the functions of
executive management, finance and accounting, investor relations, regulatory affairs, marketing,
business development, information technology, human resources, sales, legal and general
administration.
5
Note F: Earnings per Share Data
Basic earnings per share excludes the dilutive effects of stock options and warrants and of the nil
coupon non-redeemable convertible unsecured loan notes. Diluted earnings per share includes the
dilutive effect of stock options and warrants and of the nil coupon non-redeemable convertible
unsecured loan notes. The following table sets forth the weighted-average shares used in
calculating the earnings per share for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Basic weighted-average shares |
|
|
24,212,000 |
|
|
|
24,112,000 |
|
Conversion of unsecured loan notes |
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised options and warrants |
|
|
212,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average shares |
|
|
24,431,000 |
|
|
|
24,112,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
Note G: Total Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Total comprehensive income (loss) for Fuel Tech is comprised of net income and the impact of
foreign currency translation as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
214 |
|
|
|
($1,562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
155 |
|
|
|
($1,577 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note H: Stock-Based Compensation
Fuel Tech has a stock-based employee compensation plan, referred to as the Fuel Tech, Inc.
Incentive Plan (Incentive Plan), under which awards may be granted to participants in the form of
Non-Qualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock,
Performance Awards, Bonuses or other forms of share-based or non-share-based awards or combinations
thereof. Participants in the Incentive Plan may be Fuel Techs directors, officers, employees,
consultants or advisors (except consultants or advisors in capital-raising transactions) as the
directors determine are key to the success of Fuel Techs business. The amount of shares that may
be issued or reserved for awards to participants under a 2004 amendment to the Incentive Plan is
12.5% of outstanding shares calculated on a diluted basis. At March 31, 2010, Fuel Tech has
467,000 stock options available for issuance under the Incentive Plan.
Fuel Tech utilizes the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock
option grants. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense for the three-month periods
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 of $1,352 and $1,396, respectively.
The awards granted under the Incentive Plan have a 10-year life and they vest as follows: 50% after
the second anniversary of the award date, 25% after the third anniversary, and the final 25% after
the fourth anniversary of the award date. Fuel Tech calculates stock compensation expense based on
the grant date fair value of the award and recognizes expense on a straight-line basis over the
four-year service period of the award.
The principal variable assumptions utilized in valuing options and the methodology for estimating
such model inputs include: (1) risk-free interest rate an estimate based on the yield of
zerocoupon treasury securities with a maturity equal to the expected life of the option; (2)
expected volatility an estimate based on the historical volatility of Fuel Techs Common Stock
for a period equal to the expected life of the option; and (3) expected life of the option an
estimate based on historical experience including the effect of employee terminations.
7
Stock option activity for Fuel Techs Incentive Plan for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Average |
|
Remaining |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
of |
|
Exercise |
|
Contractual |
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Options |
|
Price |
|
Term |
|
Value |
|
|
|
Outstanding on January 1, 2010 |
|
|
3,051,125 |
|
|
$ |
15.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired or forfeited |
|
|
(125,750 |
) |
|
$ |
17.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding on March 31, 2010 |
|
|
2,925,375 |
|
|
$ |
15.18 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
years |
|
$ |
1,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable on March 31, 2010 |
|
|
2,006,000 |
|
|
$ |
14.55 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
years |
|
$ |
1,866 |
|
Non-vested stock award activity for all plans for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Outstanding |
Outstanding on January 1, 2010 |
|
|
1,267,125 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
Released |
|
|
(231,000 |
) |
Expired or forfeited |
|
|
(116,750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding on March 31, 2010 |
|
|
919,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010, there was $6,727 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
non-vested stock-based compensation arrangements granted under the Incentive Plan. That cost is
expected to be recognized over a period of four years.
In addition to the Incentive Plan, Fuel Tech has a Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors
(Deferred Plan). This Deferred Plan, as originally approved, provided for deferral of directors
fees in the form of either cash with interest or as phantom stock units, in either case, however,
to be paid out only as cash and not as stock at the elected time of payout. In the second quarter
of 2007, Fuel Tech obtained stockholder approval for an amendment to the Deferred Plan to provide
that instead of phantom stock units paid out only in cash, the deferred stock unit compensation may
be paid out in shares of Fuel Tech Common Stock. Under the guidance of ASC 718-10, this plan
modification required that Fuel Tech account for awards under the plan for the receipt of Fuel Tech
Common Stock, as equity awards as opposed to liability awards. For the three months ended March
31, 2010, Fuel Tech recorded stock-based compensation expense of $28 with a credit of the same
amount to additional paid-in capital representing the fair value of the stock awards granted.
At March 31, 2010, Fuel Tech had 2,362,000 stock options with exercise prices per share that were
not dilutive for the purpose of inclusion in the calculation of diluted earnings per share.
Note I: Debt
On June 30, 2009, Fuel Tech entered into a $25,000 revolving credit facility (the Facility) with
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A (JPM Chase). The Facility has a term of two years through June 30, 2011,
is unsecured, bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a spread range of 250 basis points to 375
basis points, as determined under a formula related to the Companys leverage ratio, and
8
has the Companys Italian subsidiary, Fuel Tech S.r.l., as a guarantor. Fuel Tech can use this
Facility for cash advances and standby letters of credit. As of March 31, 2010, there were no
outstanding borrowings on this Facility.
At its inception, the Facility contained several debt covenants with which the Company must comply
on a quarterly or annual basis, including: an annual capital expenditure limit of $10,000 and a
minimum net income for the quarterly period ended September 31, 2009 of $750. For subsequent
periods, the Facility covenants included an annual capital expenditure limited of $10,000, a
maximum funded debt to EBITDA ratio of 2.75:1.0 for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 and a
maximum funded debt to EBITDA ratio of 1.5:1.0 for all succeeding quarterly periods until the
facility expires. Maximum funded debt is defined as all borrowed funds, outstanding standby letters
of credit and bank guarantees. EBITDA includes after tax earnings with add backs for interest
expense, income taxes, and depreciation and amortization expenses. In addition, the Company must
maintain a minimum tangible net worth of $42,000, adjusted upward for 50% of net income generated
and 100% of all capital issuances.
As of March 31, 2010, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants of the Facility,
including a year-to-date capital expenditure amount of $307 and a tangible net worth amount of
$52,171 which was above the required amount of $49,064 by $3,107.
Beijing Fuel Tech Environmental Technologies Company, Ltd. (Beijing Fuel Tech), a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Fuel Tech, has a revolving credit facility (the China Facility) agreement with JPM
Chase for RMB 35 million (approximately $5,000), which expires on June 30, 2010. The facility is
unsecured, bears interest at a rate of 120% of the Peoples Bank of China (PBOC) Base Rate and does
not contain any material debt covenants. Beijing Fuel Tech can use this facility for cash advances
and bank guarantees. As of March 31, 2010, Beijing Fuel Tech has borrowings outstanding in the
amount $2,925, which bears interest at 5.8% .
At March 31, 2010, the Company had outstanding standby letters of credit and bank guarantees,
predominantly to customers, totaling approximately $963 in connection with contracts in process.
Fuel Tech is committed to reimbursing the issuing bank for any payments made by the bank under
these instruments. At March 31, 2010, there were no cash borrowings under the revolving credit
facility and approximately $24,037 was available.
In the event of default on either the Facility or the China Facility, the cross default feature in
each allows the lending bank to accelerate the payment of any amounts outstanding and may, under
certain circumstances, allow the bank to cancel the facility. If the Company were unable to obtain
a waiver for a breach of covenant and the bank accelerated the payment of any outstanding amounts,
such acceleration may cause the Companys cash position to deteriorate or, if cash on hand were
insufficient to satisfy the payment due, may require the Company to obtain alternate financing to
satisfy the accelerated payment.
Note J: Business Segment and Geographic Disclosures
Fuel Tech segregates its financial results into two reportable segments representing two broad
technology segments as follows:
|
|
|
The Air Pollution Control technology segment, which includes the Low- and Ultra-low
NOx Burners, over-fire air systems, HERT system, NOxOUT®, CASCADE,
AIG, GSG, ULTRA and NOxOUT-SCR® processes for the reduction of
NOx emissions in flue gas from boilers, incinerators, furnaces and other stationary
combustion sources; and |
|
|
|
The FUEL CHEM® technology segment, which uses chemical processes for the
control of slagging, fouling, corrosion, opacity, acid plume and sulfur trioxide-related
issues in furnaces and boilers through the addition of chemicals into the fuel using
TIFI® Targeted In-Furnace Injection technology. |
The Other classification includes those profit and loss items not allocated by Fuel Tech to each
reportable segment. Further, there are no intersegment sales that require elimination.
Fuel Tech evaluates performance and allocates resources based on reviewing gross margin by
reportable segment. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those
described in the summary of significant accounting policies. Fuel Tech does not review assets by
reportable segment, but rather, in aggregate for Fuel Tech as a whole.
9
Reporting segment revenues and gross margin are provided below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Air Pollution |
|
FUEL CHEM® |
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
Control Segment |
|
Segment |
|
Other |
|
Total |
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
8,214 |
|
|
$ |
9,403 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,617 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
5,258 |
|
|
|
4,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,500 |
|
Gross margin |
|
|
2,956 |
|
|
|
5,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,117 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,480 |
|
|
|
7,480 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
2,956 |
|
|
$ |
5,161 |
|
|
|
($7,626 |
) |
|
$ |
491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Air Pollution |
|
FUEL CHEM |
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
Control Segment |
|
Segment |
|
Other |
|
Total |
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
8,820 |
|
|
$ |
8,497 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,317 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
6,319 |
|
|
|
5,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,374 |
|
Gross margin |
|
|
2,501 |
|
|
|
3,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,943 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,254 |
|
|
|
8,254 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
2,501 |
|
|
$ |
3,442 |
|
|
|
($8,408 |
) |
|
|
($2,465 |
) |
Information concerning Fuel Techs operations by geographic area is provided below. Revenues are
attributed to countries based on the location of the customer. Assets are those directly
associated with operations of the geographic area.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
15,041 |
|
|
$ |
14,338 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
2,576 |
|
|
|
2,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,617 |
|
|
$ |
17,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
84,497 |
|
|
$ |
82,261 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
10,240 |
|
|
|
10,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
94,737 |
|
|
$ |
92,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
Note K: Contingencies
Fuel Tech issues a standard product warranty with the sale of its products to customers. Fuel
Techs recognition of warranty liability is based, generally, on analyses of warranty claims
experience in the preceding years. Our recognition of warranty liability is based primarily on
analyses of warranty claims experienced in the preceding years as the nature of our historical
product sales for which we offer a warranty are substantially unchanged. This approach provides an
aggregate warranty accrual that is historically aligned with actual warranty claims experienced.
Changes in the warranty liability for the three months ended March 31, 2010 are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate product warranty liability at January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
199 |
|
Aggregate accruals related to product warranties |
|
|
30 |
|
Aggregate reductions for payments |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Aggregate product warranty liability at March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
194 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note L: Income Tax
Fuel Tech had unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2009 in the amount of $870. This amount
included $840 of unrecognized tax benefits which, if ultimately recognized, will reduce Fuel Techs
annual effective tax rate. There has been no material changes in unrecognized tax benefits during
the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
Note M: Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued amended guidance on
subsequent events. Under this amended guidance, SEC filers are no longer required to disclose the
date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in originally issued and revised financial
statements. This guidance was effective immediately and we adopted these new requirements for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010.
In January 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that expands the required disclosures about
fair value measurements. This guidance provides for new disclosures requiring the Company to (i)
disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair
value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers and (ii) present separately
information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the reconciliation of Level 3 fair
value measurements. This guidance also provides clarification of existing disclosures requiring the
Company to (i) determine each class of assets and liabilities based on the nature and risks of the
investments rather than by major security type and (ii) for each class of assets and liabilities,
disclose the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both Level 2 and Level
3 fair value measurements. This guidance became effective for Fuel Tech on January 1, 2010, except
for the presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the reconciliation of Level
3 fair value measurements, which is effective for Fuel Tech on January 1, 2011, and did not have a
material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements. The guidance pertaining to the
presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the reconciliation of Level 3 fair
value measurements is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
Note N: Business Acquisitions
Fuel Tech accounts for its acquisitions as purchases in accordance with ASC 805. Accordingly, in
connection with each acquisition, the purchase price is allocated to the estimated fair values of
all acquired tangible and intangible assets and assumed liabilities as of the date of the
acquisition.
Advanced Combustion Technology, Inc.
On January 5, 2009, Fuel Tech completed its acquisition of substantially all of the assets of
Advanced Combustion Technology, Inc. (ACT or the ACT Acquisition) for approximately $22,500 in
cash, including transaction costs, plus future consideration if certain financial performance is
achieved. In connection with the final determination of the Adjustment Calculation (as defined
11
in the asset purchase agreement) related to the net working capital amount, Fuel Tech paid ACT an
additional $1,523 on July 23, 2009. All of the goodwill recognized is expected to be deductible for
income tax purposes. Operating results related to the acquisition of substantially all of the
assets of ACT and all of the related goodwill are reported as part of the APC Technology segment.
Acquisition related costs, including out-of-pocket expenses related to the transaction, were
insignificant.
Below is a breakdown of amounts recognized as of the acquisition date for each major class of
assets acquired and liabilities assumed as a result of the Companys acquisition of ACT:
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets acquired and |
|
|
|
|
liabilities assumed |
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
5,928 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets |
|
|
5,817 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
247 |
|
Contingent consideration |
|
|
2,307 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(2,673 |
) |
Other current liabilities |
|
|
(402 |
) |
Total identifiable net assets |
|
|
8,917 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
15,880 |
|
Total net assets recorded |
|
|
24,797 |
|
At March 31, 2009, the Company recorded a contingent consideration accrual representing the fair
value, weighted-average probability of future consideration expected to be paid in connection with
the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of ACT of $2,307. The contingent consideration
arrangement requires the Company to pay ACT a pro rata amount of up to $4,000 annually for the
achievement of a minimum annual gross margin dollar level (the Hurdle) of $10,000, $11,000 and
$12,000 in fiscal 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively. In addition, the Company is required to pay
ACT thirty-five percent (35%) of all qualifying gross margin dollars above the annual Hurdle rate
for each of the three years. The potential undiscounted amount of all future payments that the
Company could be required to make under the contingent consideration arrangement is between $0 and
$4,000 in any one year, and $0 and $12,000 in total, not including the amount related to the
thirty-five percent (35%) sharing of qualifying gross margin dollars above the pre-determined
Hurdle. The fair value of the contingent consideration arrangement of $2,307 was calculated using a
probability of payout for each of the three years and included only twenty-five percent (25%) of
the weighted-average, probable three-year aggregate payout as up to seventy-five percent (75%) of
the contingent consideration is subject to forfeiture.
Note O: Goodwill
Goodwill is allocated to each of Fuel Techs reporting units after considering the nature of the
net assets giving rise to the goodwill and how each reporting unit would enjoy the benefits and
synergies of the net assets acquired. Fuel Tech has two reporting units which are reported in the
FUEL CHEM segment and the APC technology segment. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
goodwill allocated to the FUEL CHEM technology segment was $1,723 and $1,723, respectively, while
goodwill allocated to the APC Technology segment was $19,328 and $19,328, respectively.
12
FUEL TECH, INC.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Results of Operations
Revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were $17,617 and $17,317, respectively.
The 2% increase versus the prior year is due primarily due to the FUEL CHEM technology segment.
The Air Pollution Control (APC) technology segment generated revenues of $8,214 for the three
months ended March 31, 2010, a decrease of $606, or 7%, from the prior year due to an
across-the-board slowdown of capital project orders for pollution control equipment from our
customer base. The decline can be attributed to the on-going regulatory uncertainty after the July
2008 decision by the U.S. District of Columbia Court of Appeals (the Court) to vacate the Clean
Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) and the pending future of the remanded Rule, which is now scheduled for
mid year 2010. The sluggish economy has reduced electrical demand by industrial customers, has
resulted in lowered utility emission levels and allowed utilities to defer APC projects. In
addition this economy decreased the cash flows and earnings for utilities and industrial customers
and necessitated certain deferrals of their capital project spending and resulted in a suppressed
level of orders for Fuel Techs APC segment in the first quarter of 2010. The Company
expects APC orders to increase substantially in the latter half of 2010.
Consolidated APC backlog at March 31, 2010 was $21,000 versus backlog at March 31, 2009 of
approximately $14,300. Substantially all of the backlog as of March 31, 2010 should be
recognized as revenue in fiscal 2010, although the timing of such revenue recognition in 2010 is
subject to the timing of the expenses incurred on existing projects.
The FUEL CHEM technology segment generated revenues of $9,403 for the three months ended March 31,
2010, an increase of $906, or 11%, versus the prior year. This increase is primarily attributed to
the recognition of $2,000 in risk share revenue from a successful FUEL CHEM demonstration
performed in 2009. Despite a flat year in 2009 in terms of revenues generated, the near-term
decrease in demand for electricity, largely related to the U.S. economic recession, has dictated
that certain Fuel Tech customers shut down or scale back certain boiler operations. This, in turn,
has resulted in certain FUEL CHEM programs being temporarily turned off or being operated at
reduced levels. Despite the near-term economic environment, the marketplace acceptance for Fuel
Techs patented
TIFI® Targeted In-Furnace Injection technology remains strong, both domestically
and abroad, particularly on coal-fired units, which represent the largest market opportunity for
the technology.
The FUEL CHEM technology segment revolves around the unique application of specialty chemicals to
improve the efficiency, reliability and environmental status of plants operating in the electric
utility, industrial, pulp and paper, and waste-to-energy markets. FUEL CHEM programs are currently
in place on over 90 combustion units, treating a wide variety of solid and liquid fuels, including
coal, heavy oil, biomass and municipal waste.
Cost of sales as a percentage of revenue for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was 54% and
66%, respectively. The cost of sales percentage for the APC technology segment decreased to 64%
from 72% in the comparable prior-year period, primarily due to an increase in higher margin project
mix. For the FUEL CHEM technology segment, the cost of sales percentage decreased to 45% from 59%
for the comparable prior-year quarter due to a reduction in variable costs related to operating
customer units. FUEL CHEM gross margins increased to 55% primarily due to the recognition of $2,000 in risk share revenue from a successful demonstration program. As this risk share payment
was contingent in nature, costs associated with this demonstration program were recognized in the
prior period.
Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
were $7,480 and $8,254, respectively. Of the $774 decrease in SG&A for the quarter versus the
prior year, $507 is due to the reduction and restructuring of the workforce that became effective
during the second half of 2009. Also contributing to this decrease was $434 in outside
fees/services due to cost containment measures and a $95 in space rental that was eliminated in
2009 due to the purchase and relocation of the corporate headquarters. Partially offsetting these
amounts was an increase of $269 in expenses related to our China subsidiary as overall business
activity has increased significantly as evidenced by recent announced contracts.
Research and development expenses for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were $146 and
$154, respectively. The Company has maintained its R&D expenditures at a conservative level in the
wake of the current economic environment. Fuel Tech continues its efforts in the pursuit of
commercial applications for its technologies outside of its traditional markets, and in the
development and analysis of new technologies that could represent incremental market opportunities.
13
The $32 change in other (income)/expense is due largely to the impact of foreign exchange rates
related to balances denominated in foreign currencies along with a loss on write-off of assets
located at the Companys prior headquarters facility.
Income tax (expense)/benefit for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was ($142) and $1,041,
respectively, and reflective of the Companys net income or loss for the respective quarters.
Liquidity and Sources of Capital
At March 31, 2010, Fuel Tech had cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments of $21,432
and working capital of $32,403 versus $20,965 and $30,578 at December 31, 2009, respectively.
Operating activities generated $685 of cash for the three months ended March 31, 2010, primarily
due to the add back of non-cash items including stock compensation expense of $1,352, depreciation
expense of $939 and amortization expense of $219, and decreases in accounts receivable, inventory
and prepaid expenses of $2,041, $355, and $116, respectively. Partially offsetting these items were
a decrease in accounts payable of $153, due to timing of vendor payments, and a decrease in income
tax provision of $476.
Investing activities used cash of $182 during the three months ended March 31, 2010, the majority
of which was used for capital expenditures, primarily to support and enhance the operations of the
FUEL CHEM technology segment.
On June 30, 2009, Fuel Tech entered into a $25,000 revolving credit facility (the Facility) with
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A (JPM Chase). The Facility has a term of two years through June 30, 2011,
is unsecured, bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a spread range of 250 basis points to 375
basis points, as determined under a formula related to the Companys leverage ratio, and has the
Companys Italian subsidiary, Fuel Tech S.r.l., as a guarantor. Fuel Tech can use this Facility for
cash advances and standby letters of credit. As of March 31, 2010, there were no outstanding
borrowings on this Facility.
At its inception, the Facility contained several debt covenants with which the Company must comply
on a quarterly or annual basis, including: an annual capital expenditure limit of $10,000 and a
minimum net income for the quarterly period ended September 31, 2009 of $750. For subsequent
periods, the Facility covenants included an annual capital expenditure limited of $10,000, a
maximum funded debt to EBITDA ratio of 2.75:1.0 for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 and a
maximum funded debt to EBITDA ratio of 1.5:1.0 for all succeeding quarterly periods until the
facility expires. Maximum funded debt is defined as all borrowed funds, outstanding standby letters
of credit and bank guarantees. EBITDA includes after tax earnings with add backs for interest
expense, income taxes, and depreciation and amortization expenses. In addition, the Company must
maintain a minimum tangible net worth of $42,000, adjusted upward for 50% of net income generated
and 100% of all capital issuances.
As of March 31, 2010, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants of the Facility,
including a year-to-date capital expenditure amount of $307 and a tangible net worth amount of
$52,171 which was above the required amount of $49,064 by $3,107.
Beijing Fuel Tech Environmental Technologies Company, Ltd. (Beijing Fuel Tech), a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Fuel Tech, has a revolving credit facility (the China Facility) agreement with JPM
Chase for RMB 35 million (approximately $5,000), which expires on June 30, 2010. The facility is
unsecured, bears interest at a rate of 120% of the Peoples Bank of China (PBOC) Base Rate and does
not contain any material debt covenants. Beijing Fuel Tech can use this facility for cash advances
and bank guarantees. As of March 31, 2010, Beijing Fuel Tech has borrowings outstanding in the
amount $2,925, which bears interest at 5.8%.
At March 31, 2010, the Company had outstanding standby letters of credit and bank guarantees,
predominantly to customers, totaling approximately $963 in connection with contracts in process.
Fuel Tech is committed to reimbursing the issuing bank for any payments made by the bank under
these instruments. At March 31, 2010, there were no cash borrowings under the revolving credit
facility and approximately $24,037 was available.
In the event of default on either the Facility or the China Facility, the cross default feature in
each allows the lending bank to accelerate the payment of any amounts outstanding and may, under
certain circumstances, allow the bank to cancel the facility. If the Company were unable to obtain
a waiver for a breach of covenant and the bank accelerated the payment of any outstanding amounts,
such acceleration may cause the Companys cash position to deteriorate or, if cash on hand were
insufficient to satisfy the payment due, may require the Company to obtain alternate financing to
satisfy the accelerated payment.
The Company generated cash from financing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2010
of $23, primarily from the non cash stock based compensation from the issuance of directors
deferred shares of stock.
14
In the opinion of management, Fuel Techs expected near-term revenue growth will be driven by the
timing of penetration of the coal-fired utility marketplace via utilization of its TIFI technology,
by utility and industrial entities adherence to the NOx reduction requirements of the various
domestic environmental regulations, and by the expansion of both business segments in non-U.S.
geographies. Fuel Tech expects its liquidity requirements to be met by the operating results
generated from these activities.
Contingencies and Contractual Obligations
Fuel Tech issues a standard product warranty with the sale of its products to customers as
discussed in Note K. The change in the warranty liability balance during the three months ended
March 31, 2010 was not material.
15
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements, as defined in Section 21E
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which are made pursuant to the safe harbor
provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and reflect Fuel Techs current
expectations regarding future growth, results of operations, cash flows, performance and business
prospects, and opportunities, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available
to, our management. Fuel Tech has tried to identify forward-looking statements by using words such
as anticipate, believe, plan, expect, estimate, intend, will, and similar
expressions, but these words are not the exclusive means of identifying forward-looking statements.
These statements are based on information currently available to Fuel Tech and are subject to
various risks, uncertainties, and other factors, including, but not limited to, those discussed in
Fuel Techs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 in Item 1A under the
caption Risk Factors, which could cause Fuel Techs actual growth, results of operations,
financial condition, cash flows, performance and business prospects and opportunities to differ
materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these statements. Fuel Tech undertakes no
obligation to update such factors or to publicly announce the results of any of the forward-looking
statements contained herein to reflect future events, developments, or changed circumstances or for
any other reason. Investors are cautioned that all forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties, including those detailed in Fuel Techs filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Foreign Currency Risk Management
Fuel Techs earnings and cash flow are subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency
exchange rates. We do not enter into foreign currency forward contracts nor into foreign currency
option contracts to manage this risk due to the immaterial nature of the transactions involved.
Fuel Tech is also exposed to changes in interest rates primarily due to its long-term debt
arrangement (refer to Note G to the consolidated financial statements). A hypothetical 100 basis
point adverse move in interest rates along the entire interest rate yield curve would not have a
materially adverse effect on interest expense during the upcoming year ended December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
Fuel Tech maintains disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls designed to ensure (a)
that information required to be disclosed in Fuel Techs filings under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and (b) that such information is accumulated
and communicated to management, including the principal executive and financial officer, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There has been no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the
quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, its internal control over financial reporting.
16
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
|
|
The risk factors included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December
31, 2009 have not materially changed. |
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
None
|
a. |
|
Exhibits (all filed herewith) |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Transition Agreement, dated April 1, 2009, between Fuel Tech, Inc. and John F. Norris Jr. |
31.1
|
|
Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
31.2
|
|
Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
32
|
|
Certification of CEO and CFO pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
17
FUEL TECH, INC.
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 6, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Douglas G. Bailey
|
|
|
|
Douglas G. Bailey |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 6, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Ellen T. Albrecht
|
|
|
|
Ellen T. Albrecht |
|
|
|
Vice President and Controller
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
18