e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007
or
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
Commission File Number: 001-33412
Superior Offshore International, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
72-1264943
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
717 Texas Avenue
Suite 3150
Houston, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
77002
(Zip Code) |
(713) 910-1875
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of November 1, 2007, the registrant had 25,930,669 shares of common stock, par value $0.01
per share, outstanding.
PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
7,501 |
|
|
$ |
2,556 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for
doubtful accounts of $1,269 and $1,084,
respectively |
|
|
61,255 |
|
|
|
38,452 |
|
Unbilled receivables |
|
|
7,988 |
|
|
|
17,258 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
777 |
|
|
|
693 |
|
Prepaid Expenses |
|
|
5,553 |
|
|
|
2,195 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
4,807 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
2,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
5,482 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
96,052 |
|
|
|
62,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment: |
|
|
187,552 |
|
|
|
75,632 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(9,638 |
) |
|
|
(6,279 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment |
|
|
177,914 |
|
|
|
69,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
16,199 |
|
|
|
4,814 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
4,031 |
|
|
|
2,950 |
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
6,336 |
|
|
|
3,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
300,532 |
|
|
$ |
142,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
36,635 |
|
|
$ |
31,250 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
19,155 |
|
|
|
9,744 |
|
Line of credit |
|
|
14,299 |
|
|
|
4,218 |
|
Notes payable, current portion |
|
|
58,877 |
|
|
|
3,608 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,561 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
2,534 |
|
|
|
4,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
131,500 |
|
|
|
63,497 |
|
Notes payable, net of current portion |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
9,759 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
9,271 |
|
|
|
5,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
141,139 |
|
|
|
78,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share,
200,000 shares authorized, 25,966 and 14,837
shares issued and outstanding at September 30,
2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share,
50,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid in capital |
|
|
123,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
1,692 |
|
|
|
895 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
34,037 |
|
|
|
63,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
159,393 |
|
|
|
64,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
300,532 |
|
|
$ |
142,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
1
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
75,495 |
|
|
$ |
64,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of revenues (excluding depreciation and amortization) |
|
|
55,555 |
|
|
|
36,739 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
10,319 |
|
|
|
3,492 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,183 |
|
|
|
780 |
|
Loss (gain) on disposal of assets |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Insurance |
|
|
1,873 |
|
|
|
1,450 |
|
Bad debt expense |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
5,392 |
|
|
|
21,897 |
|
Interest expense (income), net |
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
5,543 |
|
|
|
21,673 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
1,979 |
|
|
|
8,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,564 |
|
|
$ |
13,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
23,503 |
|
|
|
14,837 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
25,953 |
|
|
|
14,837 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
171,736 |
|
|
$ |
174,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of revenues (excluding depreciation and amortization) |
|
|
131,202 |
|
|
|
98,238 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
27,256 |
|
|
|
10,304 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,575 |
|
|
|
2,235 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
Insurance |
|
|
5,059 |
|
|
|
3,658 |
|
Bad debt expense |
|
|
2,094 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
1,514 |
|
|
|
59,323 |
|
Interest (income) expense, net |
|
|
(730 |
) |
|
|
556 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
3,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(1,607 |
) |
|
|
58,767 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
(569 |
) |
|
|
21,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,038 |
) |
|
$ |
37,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
2.54 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
2.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
20,011 |
|
|
|
14,837 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
20,011 |
|
|
|
14,837 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,038 |
) |
|
$ |
37,711 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,575 |
|
|
|
2,235 |
|
Provision for bad debt expense |
|
|
2,094 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
5,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
3,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(349 |
) |
|
|
1,129 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisition: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and unbilled receivables |
|
|
(15,627 |
) |
|
|
(25,198 |
) |
Inventory |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(301 |
) |
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
(3,358 |
) |
|
|
(2,709 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(3,622 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
14,796 |
|
|
|
1,203 |
|
Income taxes, net |
|
|
(13,250 |
) |
|
|
10,097 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
(6,488 |
) |
|
|
24,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment, net of acquisitions |
|
|
(117,693 |
) |
|
|
(28,871 |
) |
Proceeds from disposal of assets |
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
607 |
|
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(2,370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deposits in restricted cash |
|
|
(11,385 |
) |
|
|
(4,072 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(130,109 |
) |
|
|
(32,336 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on notes payable, net of assumed debt |
|
|
(126,829 |
) |
|
|
(2,965 |
) |
Proceeds from notes payable |
|
|
172,707 |
|
|
|
9,572 |
|
Draws on line of credit, net |
|
|
10,081 |
|
|
|
3,873 |
|
Debt issuance cost |
|
|
(4,188 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividend paid |
|
|
(28,256 |
) |
|
|
(844 |
) |
Proceeds from initial public offering, net |
|
|
118,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
141,542 |
|
|
|
9,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
4,945 |
|
|
|
2,100 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
2,556 |
|
|
|
3,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
7,501 |
|
|
$ |
5,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow disclosures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
13,250 |
|
|
$ |
10,050 |
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
|
3,228 |
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(1) Organization and Basis of Presentation
The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements included herein reflect the
consolidated operations of Superior Offshore International, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its
wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively, the Company). The Company generates revenues primarily
by providing subsea construction and commercial diving services to the crude oil and natural gas
exploration and production and gathering and transmission industries operating internationally and
on the outer continental shelf of the Gulf of Mexico. The Companys customers include many of the
large crude oil and natural gas producers, gathering and transmission companies and deepwater
construction companies.
Effective on April 18, 2007, Superior Offshore International, L.L.C., a Louisiana limited
liability company, merged with and into the Company. Upon the effectiveness of the merger, the
Company had outstanding 14,836,667 shares of common stock as a result of the issuance of
approximately 14,836.67 shares of common stock for each outstanding limited liability company
interest in Superior Offshore International, L.L.C. This recapitalization has been retroactively
reflected in the historical capital balances and earnings per share amounts for all periods
presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The Companys authorized capital
stock consists of 200,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and
50,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share.
The Companys unaudited consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared
pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
Accordingly, certain information and disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP) have
been condensed or omitted. The Company believes that the presentations and disclosures herein are
adequate to make the information not misleading. The unaudited consolidated financial statements
reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair
presentation of the interim periods. Certain amounts are reclassified in prior periods to conform
to current period presentations. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read
in conjunction with the Companys audited consolidated financial statements included in the
Companys Prospectus, dated April 19, 2007 and filed with the SEC on April 20, 2007 under Rule
424(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, relating to the Companys initial public offering (the IPO
Prospectus). The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of
the results of operations to be expected for the full year.
The presentation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
(2) Initial Public Offering
On April 25, 2007, the Company completed its initial public offering of 11,691,667 shares of
its common stock, including 3,025,000 shares sold by selling stockholders (the Offering), as
described in its Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-136567) originally filed
with the SEC on August 11, 2006 and the IPO Prospectus. The shares sold by the selling
stockholders included 1,525,000 shares subject to the underwriters over-allotment option, which
was exercised in full. The Company received net proceeds from the Offering, after deducting the
underwriting discount and expenses of the Offering, of $118,026,984. On April 25, 2007, the
Company:
|
|
|
repaid in full the senior secured term loan using $68,385,109 of the proceeds from
the Offering and $43,496,441 of the proceeds previously received from the Companys
senior secured term loan that were held in a segregated account; |
|
|
|
|
used $6,571,000 of the proceeds from the Offering to repay outstanding borrowings
under the Companys senior secured credit facility; and |
5
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
|
|
used $28,000,000 of the proceeds from the Offering to pay a special cash dividend to
the existing stockholders. |
The Company used the remaining $17,943,894 of the proceeds from the Offering on capital
expenditures during the three months ended June 30, 2007.
(3) Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share (EPS) is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the
weighted average number of shares outstanding. Diluted EPS includes the potential dilution to
basic EPS if unvested shares of restricted stock became vested and applicable outstanding stock
options were exercised at the end of the period.
For the three months ended September 30, 2007, the Company had 718,680 stock options that were
not included in the diluted shares computation. These stock options were considered antidilutive
since the respective exercise prices for the options were greater than the Companys average share
price for the period ended. The Company had no options or unvested restricted stock outstanding as
of September 30, 2006.
The following table presents information necessary to calculate basic and diluted EPS for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
3,564 |
|
|
$ |
13,666 |
|
|
$ |
(1,038 |
) |
|
$ |
37,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of
shares outstanding |
|
|
23,503 |
|
|
|
14,837 |
|
|
|
20,011 |
|
|
|
14,837 |
|
Add: Net effect of dilutive
stock options and unvested
restricted stock (1) |
|
|
2,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted average number
of shares outstanding |
|
|
25,953 |
|
|
|
14,837 |
|
|
|
20,011 |
|
|
|
14,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
2.54 |
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
2.54 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In periods of a net loss, potentially dilutive securities would have been antidilutive and
are therefore excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS. |
6
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(4) Property and Equipment
Property and equipment at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 is summarized as follows
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Land |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
174 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
2,034 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
15,975 |
|
|
|
5,989 |
|
Diving vessels and equipment |
|
|
80,608 |
|
|
|
22,195 |
|
Automobiles, trucks, and trailers |
|
|
1,109 |
|
|
|
976 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
179 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
87,493 |
|
|
|
44,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
$ |
187,552 |
|
|
$ |
75,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in construction in progress at September 30, 2007 is the Superior Achiever, a
double-redundant, dynamically positioned (DP III) deepwater construction and dive support vessel
that the Company expects to place in service during the second half of 2008, and the Gulf Diver IV.
During the first nine months of 2007, the Company paid $40,050,906 of scheduled payments to
the shipbuilder for the construction of the Superior Achiever and paid $7,180,346 for equipment
relating to the vessel. Total payments made to the shipbuilder were $61,921,047 at September 30,
2007. Three remaining scheduled payments of 6,173,500 (or $8,010,116), based on the original
specifications of the vessel, are due on December 27, 2007, January 2, 2008 and June 30, 2008. The
final payment will be paid with a cash secured letter of credit of 6,173,500 (or $8,010,116).
In addition, a payment of 4,385,218 (or $6,051,600) resulting from change orders relating to
certain specifications of the vessel is due in June 2008.
The Company is currently considering several strategic options with regard to the Gulf Diver
IV, including refurbishment or possible sale. As of September 30, 2007, the book value of the Gulf
Diver IV was $5,629,994. Any possible financial effect of these actions is not currently
determinable.
7
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(5) Notes Payable and Lines of Credit
Notes payable and lines of credit of the Company consisted of the following (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Lines of credit |
|
$ |
14,299 |
|
|
$ |
4,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured term loan facility due in nineteen equal quarterly
installments of 3.75% of the amount outstanding on December 31, 2008
beginning March 2009, with the balance payable in December 2013,
interest at federal funds effective rate plus 0.50% per annum (weighted
average of 8.63% at September 30, 2007)(1) |
|
$ |
55,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Note payable to bank due in monthly installments of principal of $79
plus interest through April 2010, with a final balloon payment of $1,964
due on April 12, 2010, interest at JPMorgans prime rate plus 0.50% per
annum (9.04% at December 31, 2006) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,028 |
|
Note payable to bank due in monthly installments of principal of $38
plus interest July 2006 through June 2011, interest at JPMorgans prime
rate plus 0.50% per annum (9.04% at December 31, 2006) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,025 |
|
Note payable to bank due in monthly installments of principal of $30
plus interest July 2006 through June 2011, interest at JPMorgans prime
rate plus 0.50% per annum (9.04% at December 31, 2006) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,620 |
|
Non-revolving line of credit with a maximum aggregate principal of $3,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,909 |
|
Insurance premium financing note due in monthly installments of $227
from May 12, 2006 through January 12, 2007 (7.9% per annum) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
226 |
|
Insurance premium financing note due in monthly installments of $226
from August 1, 2006 through April 1, 2007 (7.9% per annum) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
888 |
|
Various insurance premium financing notes due in monthly installments of
$710, collectively, through January 1, 2008, and monthly installments
of $171, collectively, from January 2, 2008 through April 1, 2008
(ranging from 6.46% to 10.84% per annum) |
|
|
3,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other notes payable |
|
|
946 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,245 |
|
|
|
13,367 |
|
Notes payable, current portion |
|
|
(58,877 |
) |
|
|
(3,608 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable, net of current portion |
|
$ |
368 |
|
|
$ |
9,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The outstanding balance of the senior secured term loan facility was classified as current
debt in the consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2007 due to the Companys
non-compliance with certain covenants contained in the agreement governing the facility. For
additional information regarding the senior secured term loan facility, see Term Loan
Facility below. |
Lines of Credit
The Company entered into a line of credit agreement dated April 12, 2005, as amended, with
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (JPMorgan) that provided for borrowings up to $5,500,000, the amount of
which was later increased to $30,000,000 as of December 31, 2006. Borrowings outstanding at
December 31, 2006 totaled $4,218,470 and bore interest at 7.25% (0.50% above the prime rate of
JPMorgan). The line of credit was paid off on February 27, 2007 with proceeds from the senior
secured term loan entered into on that date.
On February 27, 2007, the Company entered into a senior secured credit facility with JPMorgan,
which replaced the line of credit noted above. As amended on June 19, 2007, the senior secured
credit facility provides for up to $30,000,000 in revolving credit loans, which must be repaid by
February 2010. The amount from time to time available under the senior secured credit facility may
not exceed the sum of up to 85% of the Companys eligible accounts receivable less reserves
established by the administrative agent in its permitted discretion, as that term is
8
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
described in the credit agreement. As amended on June 19, 2007, the senior secured credit
facility also includes availability for letters of credit in an amount not to exceed $25,000,000.
On August 14, 2007, the Company entered into a second amendment to the senior secured credit
facility that, among other things, provides that at the request of the Company, the administrative
agent may in its sole discretion make revolving loans to the Company, in amounts that exceed
availability (as defined in the agreement governing the senior secured credit facility (the Credit
Facility Agreement)) (any such excess revolving loan, an Overadvance). The amendment also
provides that no Overadvance may remain outstanding for more than 30 days, and no Overadvance may
cause any revolving lenders revolving exposure (as defined in the Credit Facility Agreement) to
exceed its revolving commitment (as defined in the Credit Facility Agreement). In addition, the
amendment provides that the Companys fixed charge coverage ratio may not be less than 0.80 to 1.0
for the quarter ending September 30, 2007.
On August 24, 2007, the Company entered into a third amendment to the senior secured credit
facility that, among other things, provides for revolving credit loans in an aggregate amount up to
$15,000,000 that are secured by a first priority lien on eligible foreign accounts receivable of
the Company and guaranteed by the Export-Import Bank of the United States (the Foreign Loan).
Amounts borrowed under the Foreign Loan would be counted towards, and would not be in addition to,
the up to $30,000,000 available under the existing revolving credit facility. The Foreign Loan
expires in February 2008. Borrowings under the Foreign Loan bear interest at the London Interbank
Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a spread ranging from 1.50% to 2.00%, subject to a performance-based
grid.
The Company had $14,299,445 outstanding under the senior secured credit facility as of
September 30, 2007. The proceeds of the senior secured credit facility may be used for the
Companys general corporate purposes, including vessel construction costs and refinancing of
certain existing indebtedness. As of September 30, 2007, $16,199,019 was deposited in escrow
(restricted cash) to secure letters of credit required for the construction of the Superior
Achiever and for other capital projects and charter agreements.
Borrowings under the senior secured credit facility, other than with respect to the Foreign
Loan, bear interest, at the Companys option, at either (1) the greater of (a) JPMorgans prime
rate and (b) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.5%, or (2) LIBOR (as adjusted for statutory
reserve requirements for eurocurrency liabilities) plus a spread ranging from 1.75% to 2.25%,
subject to a performance-based grid. The effective interest rate on the senior secured credit
facility, including the Foreign Loan, was 7.75% as of September 30, 2007.
The Company is obligated to pay the lenders certain fees on the average daily unadvanced
portion of the lenders loan commitments, and certain fees for issuance of letters of credit.
Borrowings under the senior secured credit facility are subject to mandatory prepayment
(1) with the proceeds of certain asset sales, (2) with the proceeds of certain sales of the
Companys equity securities, (3) with the proceeds from certain debt issuances, and (4) with any
insurance proceeds received in excess of $500,000 with respect to the collateral, subject, in each
case, to certain exceptions.
The Credit Facility Agreement contains covenants that include, among others:
|
|
|
the maintenance of a ratio of consolidated total debt (as defined in the Credit
Facility Agreement) to consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Facility
Agreement) of no greater than 2.0 to 1.0 (the Consolidated Leverage Ratio); |
|
|
|
|
the maintenance of a ratio of EBITDA minus the unfinanced portion of capital
expenditures to fixed charges (the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio) of at least 1.2
to 1.0; |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on incurring indebtedness, including certain capital lease, guarantee
and charter obligations; |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on incurring liens on certain of the Companys property and the
property of the Companys subsidiaries; |
9
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
|
|
restrictions on selling assets or inventory outside the ordinary course of business; |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on capital expenditures (as defined in the Credit Facility Agreement); |
|
|
|
|
prohibitions on entering into sale and leaseback transactions; and |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on transactions with affiliates and materially changing the Companys
business. |
On August 14, 2007, the Company amended the senior secured credit facility to allow it to
maintain a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of at least 0.8 to 1.0 for the quarter ended September 30,
2007.
The Credit Facility Agreement also includes customary events of default, which include the
Companys failure to make a payment in respect of certain indebtedness other than the senior
secured credit facility in excess of $2.5 million, or the occurrence of an event resulting in or
permitting the acceleration of such indebtedness. If a default occurs and is continuing, the
Company may be required to repay all amounts outstanding under the senior secured credit facility.
The Company is currently in compliance with the covenants contained in the Credit Facility
Agreement, as amended, other than the maintenance of the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio and the
Leverage Ratio for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 and the restrictions on capital
expenditures for fiscal 2007. On November 14, 2007, the Company obtained a waiver from the lender
with respect to compliance with these covenants for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 and
amended the Credit Facility Agreement to allow the Company to maintain a Fixed Charge Coverage
Ratio, determined for any period of four consecutive fiscal quarters, of at least 1.2 to 1.0 as of
the end of each fiscal quarter, provided that the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio for the fiscal
quarter ending on (1) December 2007, the calculation of the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio will be for
the fiscal quarter beginning October 1, 2007, (2) March 2008, the calculation of the Fixed Charge
Coverage Ratio will be for the two immediately preceding fiscal quarters ending as of March 2008 and (3) June 2008, the calculation of the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio will be for the three
immediately preceding fiscal quarters ending as of June 2008. The amendment to the Credit
Facility Agreement also allows the Company to maintain a Consolidated Leverage Ratio as of the last
day of any period of four consecutive fiscal quarters of at least 2.75 to 1.0, provided that the
Consolidated Leverage Ratio as of the last day of the four consecutive fiscal quarters ending on
March 31, 2008 may not exceed 3.0 to 1.0.
Finally, the amendment to the Credit Facility Agreement permits the Company to make up to
$75,000,000 of capital expenditures during fiscal 2007 and $40,000,000 of capital expenditures
during each fiscal year thereafter, excluding permitted capital expenditures related to the Superior Achiever
and related equipment to the extent financed or refinanced with
certain term debt.
Senior Secured Term Loan
On February 27, 2007, the Company entered into a senior secured term loan with a syndicate of
financial institutions. The senior secured term loan was in an aggregate principal amount of
$110,000,000. The senior secured term loan was repayable in five equal quarterly installments of
$275,000 beginning June 30, 2007 ($825,000 of principal due in 2007) and in equal quarterly
installments of $3,750,000 beginning September 30, 2008, with the balance payable in February 2012.
The senior secured term loan bore interest, at the Companys option, at either (1) the greater of
(a) JPMorgans prime rate and (b) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.5%, in each case plus a
spread equal to a performance-based grid, or (2) LIBOR (as adjusted for statutory reserve
requirements for eurocurrency liabilities) plus 3.5%.
The Company used the proceeds from the senior secured term loan to repay all outstanding
indebtedness, and the Company terminated its existing line of credit agreement and revolving credit
agreement as of February 27, 2007 upon repayment.
On April 25, 2007, the Company repaid in full the senior secured term loan using $68,385,109
of the proceeds from the Offering and $43,496,441 of the proceeds previously received from the
senior secured term loan that were being held in a segregated account. In April 2007, the Company
expensed the outstanding debt issuance
10
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
cost related to the senior secured term loan in the amount of $3,850,654. See Note 2 for
further discussion of the Offering.
Term Loan Facility
On June 20, 2007, the Company entered into a senior secured term loan facility (the Term Loan
Facility) with a syndicate of financial institutions led by Fortis Capital Corp., as
administrative agent. The Term Loan Facility provides for up to $60,000,000 in term loans.
The Term Loan Facility is available for multiple borrowings in minimum amounts of $5,000,000
beginning on June 20, 2007 through December 31, 2008. Amounts borrowed and repaid may not be
reborrowed. Any commitments not drawn prior to December 31, 2008 will be cancelled. As of
September 30, 2007, $55,000,000 was outstanding under the Term Loan Facility.
Borrowings under the Term Loan Facility bear interest, at the Companys option, at either:
|
|
|
a base rate equal to the greater of |
|
- |
|
the federal funds effective rate, plus 0.50%; and |
|
|
- |
|
the prime lending rate; |
plus a spread equal to 1.00% per annum, or
|
|
|
LIBOR, plus a spread equal to 3.25% per annum. |
The Company is obligated to pay the lenders certain fees on the average daily unadvanced
portion of the lenders loan commitments.
Borrowings under the Term Loan Facility must be repaid in 19 equal quarterly installments,
commencing in March 2009, of 3.75% of the amount outstanding on December 31, 2008, with the balance
payable in December 2013. Borrowings under the Term Loan Facility are subject to mandatory
prepayment (1) with 35% of the Companys excess cash flow in any fiscal quarter, commencing with
the quarter ending after the Superior Achiever is placed in service and (2) with the proceeds of
certain issuances of debt or equity or asset sales, as defined in the agreement governing the Term
Loan Facility (the Term Loan Agreement).
The Term Loan Facility is secured by (1) a perfected first priority security interest in all
of the Companys vessels, equipment and other tangible assets, and (2) a perfected second priority
security interest in the Companys accounts receivable and inventory that are pledged in connection
with the senior secured credit facility.
The Term Loan Agreement contains covenants that include, among others:
|
|
|
the maintenance of a ratio of consolidated total debt (as defined in the Term Loan
Agreement) to consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the Term Loan Agreement) of no greater
than 2.0 to 1.0 (the Consolidated Leverage Ratio); |
|
|
|
|
the maintenance of a ratio of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated interest expense
(as defined in the Term Loan Agreement) of at least 5.0 to 1.0; |
|
|
|
|
the maintenance of a ratio of appraised fair market value of vessels (as defined in
the Term Loan Agreement) and related equipment pledged as collateral to outstanding
borrowings under the senior secured term loan facility of at least 1.20 to 1.0 until
December 31, 2008 and 2.0 to 1.0 thereafter; |
11
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
|
|
restrictions on incurring indebtedness, including certain capital lease, guarantee
and charter obligations; |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on incurring liens on certain of the Companys property and the
property of the Companys subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on selling assets or inventory outside the ordinary course of business; |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on capital expenditures (as defined in the Term Loan Agreement); |
|
|
|
|
prohibitions on entering into sale and leaseback transactions; and |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on transactions with affiliates and materially changing the Companys
business. |
The Term Loan Agreement also includes customary events of default, which include the Companys
failure to make a payment in respect of certain indebtedness other than the Term Loan Facility in
excess of $2.5 million, or the occurrence of an event of default resulting in or permitting the
acceleration of such indebtedness. If a default occurs and is continuing, the Company may be
required to repay all amounts outstanding under the Term Loan Facility.
The Company is currently in compliance with the covenants contained in the Term Loan
Agreement, other than the Consolidated Leverage Ratio for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 and
the restrictions on capital expenditures for fiscal 2007. On November 14, 2007, the Company
obtained a waiver from the lender with respect to compliance with these covenants through the
earlier of (1) December 31, 2007 and (2) the waiver termination date, which is defined as
(a) November 30, 2007, if the Company has not received a written commitment from an alternative
lender to refinance the Term Loan Facility by that date (the
Commitment Letter) on terms and conditions satisfactory
to the administrative agent in its sole discretion, (b) December 7, 2007, if the administrative agent under
the senior secured credit facility has not consented to the
refinancing of the Term Loan Facility in full on the terms and
conditions described in the Commitment Letter,
(c) December 21, 2007, if the Term Loan Facility has not been refinanced by that date, (d) the date
on which any waiver of events of default under the senior secured credit facility ceases to be in
full force and effect for any reason, (e) the date on which the Company fails to make a payment
when due with respect to the construction of the Superior Achiever and (f) the date on which any
event of default under the Term Loan Agreement, other than the existing defaults described above,
occurs.
The outstanding balance of $55,000,000 under the Term Loan Facility was classified as current
debt in the consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2007. Due to the Companys
non-compliance with certain covenants contained in the Term Loan Agreement, the debt is callable
after November 30, 2007 if the Company does not obtain a written commitment for a replacement term
loan facility with an alternate lender by that time. The Company is currently negotiating a term
loan facility with an alternate lender to refinance the existing Term Loan Facility and to increase
the Companys ability to borrow.
The aggregate maturities of long-term debt for each of the five twelve-month periods
subsequent to September 30, 2007 are: $58,877,000 in Year 1,
$157,000 in Year 2, $112,000 in
Year 3, $63,000 in Year 4 and $36,000 in Year 5.
Interest Expense (Income)
Interest expense (income), net for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and
September 30, 2006 consists of the following components (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
(218 |
) |
|
$ |
(75 |
) |
|
$ |
(933 |
) |
|
$ |
(159 |
) |
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense (income), net |
|
$ |
(151 |
) |
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
$ |
(730 |
) |
|
$ |
556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(6) Commitments and Contingencies
(a) Leases
On January 4, 2007, the Company entered into an agreement to lease a crane. The Company was
obligated to make lease payments of $17,322 per month beginning February 2007; however, the lease
subsequently was paid off in the first quarter of 2007 through the purchase of the crane in the
amount of $859,159.
On February 26, 2007, the Company entered into a lease agreement with a company that Mr. Louis
E. Schaefer, Jr., the Chairman of the Board of the Company, owns in respect of the Companys
property in Houston, Texas. The agreement, which provided for monthly payments of $3,000, was
terminated by the Company in the second quarter of 2007.
On February 26, 2007, the Company entered into two lease agreements with a company that
Mr. Schaefer owns in respect to the Companys property in Belle Chasse, Louisiana. Each agreement
has a term of three years and provides for monthly payments of approximately $3,500 and $1,500,
respectively. In August 2007, the Company closed its facility in Belle Chasse and transferred a
portion of the inventory and equipment to its other facilities. Subsequent to the closure of the
facility, in September 2007 a related party of Mr. Schaefer purchased the remaining inventory and
equipment and assumed the lease agreements. The Company recognized a gain of approximately $40,000
on the sale of assets. Additionally, the Company expensed approximately $780,000 of unamortized
leasehold improvements in its consolidated statements of operations related to the Belle Chasse
property, which were previously being amortized over the lease term.
On May 1, 2007, the Company entered into a sublease agreement for 13,882 square feet of office
space in Houston, Texas. This sublease agreement has a term of approximately two years and four
months and provides for average monthly payments of $26,803.
On October 18, 2007, the Company entered into a lease agreement for 4,450 square feet of
office space in Trinidad. The lease agreement has a term of one year, effective November 1, 2007,
and provides for monthly payments of $25,000.
(b) Charters
On February 13, 2007, the Company entered into a contract for the charter of the Adams
Surveyor. The contract term for the charter is one year, subject to options to extend the charter
for up to two additional six-month periods. The Company took delivery of the Adams Surveyor in
March 2007.
On June 27, 2007, the Company entered into a contract for the charter of the Toisa Puma, a DP
vessel. The contract term for the charter is two years, subject to options to extend the charter
for up to two additional six-month periods. The Toisa Puma was delivered to the Company in late
July 2007. For more information regarding the contract for the charter of the Toisa Puma, see (d)
below.
On June 27, 2007, the Company entered into a contract for the charter of the Crossmar XIV.
The contract term for the charter is through the completion of the assigned project. The Company
took delivery of the Crossmar XIV in early July 2007.
On July 17, 2007, the Company entered into a contract for the charter of the Seamec III, a DP
vessel. The contract term for the charter is six months, subject to options to extend the charter
for up to three additional six-month periods. The Company took delivery of the Seamec III in late
July 2007.
In late July 2007, the Company determined that it was the tax withholding agent for a
foreign-owned vessel that operated in U.S. waters in 2004 and 2005. The charter agreement
stipulates that the vessel owner is responsible for payment of taxes. The Company is required by
law to withhold taxes with respect to payments made to the vessel owner, which should have been
done as payments were made in 2004 and 2005. The amount that should have been withheld, including
interest, is approximately $980,000, which the Company is attempting to collect from
13
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
the vessel owner. Because collection of this amount cannot be assured, the Company recorded
the total amount in cost of revenues in the second quarter of 2007. The withholding tax relating
to 2004 and 2005 is approximately $459,000 and $388,000, respectively, excluding interest. The
Company recorded the correction of this error in the three months ended June 30, 2007 as an
increase to cost of revenue of approximately $980,000, including interest. Income tax benefit was
increased by approximately $346,000, resulting in an increase in the net loss of $634,000. Neither
the origination nor the correction of the error was material to the Companys financial statements.
(c) Purchase Commitments
On September 21, 2006, the Company entered into a definitive agreement for the construction of
the Superior Achiever for 61,735,500 (or approximately $80,000,000 based on current exchange
rates at the time of payment of the initial commitment fee and the first installment payment and
reflecting the exchange rate set forth in the Companys currency hedging agreement relating to the
remaining installments described below). On November 8, 2006, the Company entered into a hedging
transaction with the purpose and effect of capping the exchange rate, at 1.2975 U.S. dollars to
1 Euro, on $72,091,436 of payments relating to the construction of the vessel through June 2008.
The Company expects to place the vessel in service in the second half of 2008. As of September 30,
2007, the Company had paid the shipbuilder 47,600,068 (or approximately $61,921,047), which is
included in property and equipment.
Effective December 1, 2006, the Company acquired the subsea construction, commercial diving,
offshore crude oil and natural gas logistical support and marine salvage businesses of Subtech
Diving (Pty) Ltd. and Subtech Marine (Pty) Ltd. (Subtech Diving and Marine) for approximately
$2,800,000, net of approximately $1,000,000 cash acquired. In addition, the Company paid an
additional $1,400,000 in the third quarter of 2007 based on the financial performance of the
Companys Subtech subsidiary for the twelve-month period ended June 2007, leaving a remaining
liability of $2,500,000 as of September 30, 2007, of which the Company expects to pay approximately
$1,500,000 during the fourth quarter of 2007. See Note 10 for further discussion of the
acquisition.
On March 8, 2007, the Company finalized the purchase agreement to acquire a saturation diving
system relating to the construction of the Superior Achiever for $16,900,000 due in various
installments through June 2008. The Company was required to deposit $1,690,000 upon entering into
the contract, which is included in property and equipment.
On March 29, 2007, the Company entered into a purchase agreement to acquire a remotely
operated vehicle, or ROV, for $4,089,216 due in various installments through May 2007, which the
Company has paid in full.
On July 26, 2007, the Company entered into a purchase agreement to acquire two ROVs to be
placed onboard the Superior Achiever for $9,365,576 due in various installments through September
2008. The Company deposited $900,000 to secure production slots for the two ROVs.
(d) Litigation
In September 2007, the Company entered into binding arbitration proceedings related to a
dispute over the non-payment of certain fees under its two-year charter of the Toisa Puma, based on
the readiness of the vessel for its intended use. The Company is asserting that it is not liable
under the charter for the payment of fees of approximately $3,500,000 relating to the period from
delivery of the vessel in July 2007 to the drydocking of the vessel beginning in early October
2007. The Company is also seeking reimbursement of $700,000 that the Company paid the vessel owner
for the initial two-week period of the charter. Because the ultimate outcome of the arbitration
cannot currently be determined, the Company has not recorded a provision in its consolidated
financial statements for possible liabilities, which range from zero to approximately $3,500,000.
In addition, the consolidated financial statements do not reflect amounts related to the possible
recovery of the $700,000 of fees already paid. The Company may be entitled to cancel the charter
at no further cost to the Company if the vessel is not returned from drydock before December 8,
2007.
14
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The Company is routinely involved in litigation, claims and disputes arising in the ordinary
course of its business. Except as discussed above, the Company does not believe that ultimate
liability, if any, resulting from any such pending litigation will have a material adverse effect
on its financial condition or results of operations.
(7) Major Customers
The Companys customers consist primarily of integrated and independent crude oil and natural
gas exploration and production and gathering and transmission companies. Customers accounting for
more than 10% of consolidated revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and
2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
Customer |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Customer A |
|
|
69 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Customer B |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
Customer C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
Customer D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Customer E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Customer F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
% |
The amount of revenue accounted for by a customer depends on the level of construction
services the Company performs for the customer, which is based on the size of the customers
capital expenditure budget and the Companys ability to bid for and obtain the project. The
capital expenditures of the Companys customers are generally dependent on their views of future
crude oil and natural gas prices and successful offshore drilling activity. Consequently,
customers who account for a significant portion of the Companys revenues in one year may represent
an immaterial portion of revenues in subsequent years. The Company performs ongoing credit
evaluations of its customers and provides allowances for probable credit losses when necessary. As
the Company has increased its focus on providing services in international locations, the
composition of its customers has shifted as compared to prior periods.
As of September 30, 2007, one customer accounted for 66% of total billed and unbilled
receivables. At December 31, 2006, three customers accounted for 50% of total billed and unbilled
receivables. Accounts receivable related to these customers totaled $42,847,302 and $27,961,621 at
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.
(8) Contributions to Employee Benefit Plan
The Company sponsors a contributory 401(k) Plan in which salaried employees become eligible
after completing six months of service and attaining age 21. The plan allows participants to
contribute up to the Internal Revenue Service limit of $15,500 for 2007 (plus an additional amount
up to $5,000 for employees over the age of 50), with the Company making safe harbor contributions
as needed and possible discretionary contributions. Plan expense for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007 was $202,863 and $647,814, respectively, and $60,901 and $377,407 for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively.
15
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(9) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48), on January 1, 2007.
FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises
financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, and
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for financial statement recognition and
measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides
guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure and transition. The Company has evaluated its tax positions for the tax years ended
December 31, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006, the tax years that remain subject to examination by major
tax jurisdictions as of September 30, 2007. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject
to U.S. federal, state and local, or income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to
2003. The Company concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring
recognition in the financial statements. Accordingly, adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material
effect on the Companys financial statements.
The Company may from time to time be assessed interest or penalties by major tax
jurisdictions, although any such assessments historically have been minimal and immaterial to the
Companys financial results. Any interest or penalties assessed are classified as income tax
expenses.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157), which
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 will be effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal
years. The Company is currently evaluating the requirements of this new standard and has not
concluded its analysis on the impact of the adoption of this standard on the Companys financial
position or results of operations.
In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 108, Considering the Effects of
Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements (SAB
108). SAB 108 provides interpretive guidance on how the effects of the carryover or reversal of
prior year misstatements should be considered in quantifying a current year misstatement. The
pronouncement prescribes an approach whereby the effect of all unrecorded identified errors should
be considered on all of the financial statements rather than just either the effect on the balance
sheet or the income statement. The Company adopted the provisions of SAB 108 on January 1, 2007.
The adoption of SAB 108 did not have a material effect on the Companys financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities (SFAS 159), which permits entities to choose to measure many financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value. SFAS 159 will be effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently
evaluating the requirements of this new standard and any impact of its adoption on the Companys
financial position or results of operations.
(10) Acquisitions
Subtech Diving and Marine. Effective December 1, 2006, the Company, through a wholly owned
subsidiary, acquired the subsea construction, commercial diving, offshore crude oil and natural gas
logistical support and marine salvage businesses of South Africa-based Subtech Diving and Marine
for approximately $2,800,000 (of which $969,688 was paid in January 2007), net of approximately
$1,000,000 cash acquired. In addition, the Company had estimated that it would pay additional
contingent consideration of $3,900,000 in the third quarter of 2007, which was recorded in other
current liabilities as of June 30, 2007. During the third quarter of 2007, the Company paid
$1,400,000 of this amount based on the financial performance of the Companys Subtech subsidiary
for the twelve-month period ended June 2007, leaving a remaining liability of $2,500,000 as of
September 30, 2007, of which the Company expects to pay approximately $1,500,000 during the fourth
quarter of 2007. The acquisition was financed through cash from operations.
The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting in accordance with
U.S. GAAP, with the purchase price paid by the Company being allocated to the net assets acquired
from Subtech
16
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Diving and Marine, as of the acquisition date, based on their estimated fair values. The
allocation of the purchase price was based on preliminary estimates subject to further assessment
and adjustment pending the results of the Companys final appraisals.
Subtech Diving and Marines results of operations have been included in the Companys
Consolidated Statement of Operations since December 1, 2006. Pro forma results of operations have
not been presented because the effect of this acquisition was not material to the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
Ocean Flow International L.L.C. On October 18, 2007, the Company entered into an agreement
and plan of merger with Ocean Flow International L.L.C. (Ocean Flow) pursuant to which the
Company agreed to acquire, through a wholly owned subsidiary, all of the outstanding membership
interests of Ocean Flow, a privately held deepwater subsea project engineering and management
services firm. See Note 13 for more information regarding the acquisition of Ocean Flow.
(11) Comprehensive Income
The components of total comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2007 and 2006 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
3,564 |
|
|
$ |
13,666 |
|
|
$ |
(1,038 |
) |
|
$ |
37,711 |
|
Unrealized gain on foreign
currency hedges, net of tax of
$419 and $292 for 2007 |
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation gain |
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
4,565 |
|
|
$ |
13,666 |
|
|
$ |
(241 |
) |
|
$ |
37,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income, as of the periods noted, were as
follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Unrealized gain on foreign currency hedges, net of
tax of $831 and $538 |
|
$ |
1,543 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
Cumulative foreign currency translation gains (losses) |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
$ |
1,692 |
|
|
$ |
895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(12) Stock-Based Compensation
During 2007, the Company granted stock-based awards under its 2007 Stock Incentive Plan as
follows (number of shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock |
|
Stock Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price on |
|
Vesting |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Vesting |
|
|
Number |
|
Date of |
|
Period |
|
Number |
|
Exercise |
|
Period |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Grant |
|
(years) |
|
of Shares |
|
Price |
|
(years) |
April 2007 (1) |
|
|
2,163 |
|
|
$ |
15.00 |
|
|
|
3.0/4.5 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
$ |
15.00 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
May 2007 |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
18.21 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
18.13 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
July 2007 |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
18.30 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 2007 |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
13.77 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
13.77 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The grant date with respect to the restricted stock and stock options was April
16, 2007, prior to the completion of the Offering. |
Stock options and restricted shares are granted at the market price of the Companys stock on
the date of grant. Stock options vest in equal increments over four years and restricted stock is
generally subject to graded vesting over three or four-and-one-half years. The awards generally
expire ten years from the date of grant.
Compensation expense for stock-based awards is based on the fair value of the award on the
date of grant and is recognized on a straight-line basis, net of related forfeitures, over the
requisite service period of the award, generally the vesting period. The fair value of restricted
stock is based on the market price of the Companys stock on the date of grant. The fair value of
stock options is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model which
includes various assumptions. The following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used
in the option pricing model for the nine months ended September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
Expected life (years) |
|
|
6.25 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
Volatility |
|
|
56.0 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Weighted-average fair value per share at grant date |
|
|
8.85 |
|
The expected life of the options represents the period of time the options are expected to be
outstanding and was based on the midpoint between the contractual vesting period and the ten-year
expiration of the options, if unexercised. As actual post-vest termination data results are
obtained in future years, the Company will transition to an expected life based on historical
exercise trends. The expected volatility is based on the average reported historical volatility of
the Companys competitors for a period approximating the expected life. The risk-free interest
rate is based on the observed U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time the options were
granted.
Compensation expense, net of tax, was $2,118,100 and $3,567,191 for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007, respectively. See Note 13 for an estimate of the Companys remaining
compensation expense, net of tax, from the recognition of share-based compensation for outstanding
awards through 2011.
(13) Subsequent Events
On October 18, 2007, the Company entered into an agreement and plan of merger with Ocean Flow
pursuant to which the Company agreed to acquire, through a wholly owned subsidiary, all of the
outstanding membership interests of Ocean Flow, a privately held deepwater subsea project
engineering and management services firm. The consideration for the merger consists of 1,283,587
shares of common stock of the Company, which will be issued pursuant to an exemption from
registration under Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The merger is
scheduled to close by the end of November 2007 and is subject to customary conditions, including,
among others, the following: (1) the accuracy of the representations and warranties made by each
party; (2) obtaining certain consents and approvals; and (3) the absence of any material adverse
change in the business, condition, prospects, properties or results of operations of Ocean Flow.
The agreement contains customary termination rights.
On October 22, 2007, R. Joshua Koch, Jr., the Companys Senior Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary, and a member of the Board of Directors of the Company, resigned as an officer and
director of the Company effective as of November 2, 2007, and Patrice Chemin, the Companys Chief
Operating Officer and Executive Vice President of Africa and Middle East, resigned as an officer of
the Company effective as of October 22, 2007. The Company will incur a charge of $5,935,239 in the
fourth quarter of 2007 in connection with severance and other payments owed to Messrs. Koch and
Chemin under their respective separation agreements. The charge consists of the following items:
$950,000 in cash payments, of which approximately $717,300 is payable in
18
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
2007 and $232,700 is
payable in 2008; $5,011,979 relating to shares of restricted stock (weighted-average price on date
of the separation agreements of $10.94) previously granted to Messrs. Koch and Chemin, the
restrictions on which lapsed in October 2007 as provided in their respective separation agreements;
and $(26,740) relating to stock options (weighted-average price on date of the separation agreement
of $10.94) previously granted to Mr. Chemin that became fully vested and immediately exercisable in
October 2007 as provided in his separation agreement.
After giving effect to the acceleration of the outstanding equity-based awards made to Messrs.
Koch and Chemin, based on the total awards outstanding at September 30, 2007, the Company estimates
that its remaining compensation expense, net of tax, from the recognition of share-based
compensation for outstanding awards will be approximately $5,226,086 in the fourth quarter of 2007,
$5,537,767 in 2008, $5,533,254 in 2009, $4,310,738 in 2010 and $2,411,985 in 2011.
On November 13, 2007, the Company entered into Change in Control Agreements with certain of
its executive officers. The agreements entitle each officer to receive severance payments upon his
termination by the Company without cause (as defined in the agreement) or by the officer for good
reason (as defined in the agreement) within 12 months following a change in control (as defined in
the agreement) involving the Company.
19
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations
should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto appearing in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as well as with our
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing in our Prospectus, dated
April 19, 2007 and filed with the SEC on April 20, 2007, relating to our initial public offering
(the IPO Prospectus). This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that
involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated
in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth under
the caption Risk Factors in our IPO Prospectus. For additional information concerning
forward-looking statements, please read Forward-Looking Information below.
Our Business
We generate revenues primarily by providing subsea construction and commercial diving services
to the crude oil and natural gas exploration and production and gathering and transmission
industries operating internationally and on the outer continental shelf of the Gulf of Mexico. Our
customers include many of the large crude oil and natural gas producers, gathering and transmission
companies and deepwater construction companies. In the second and third quarters of 2007, we made
significant progress on implementing our strategy of continuing to expand our business from shallow
water operations in the Gulf of Mexico to deepwater and international locations.
In order to help satisfy the increased demand for subsea construction and commercial diving
services, we have significantly expanded our capacity by acquiring vessels, chartering vessels on
both a long- and short-term basis and hiring diving and marine personnel. In addition, we have
broadened the scope of the services we provide to include higher-margin subsea and deepwater
construction services. Moreover, we regularly seek to provide services to third-party vessels and
charter vessels on a short-term basis during periods of high demand for our subsea construction and
commercial diving services.
We perform our services under dayrate or fixed-price contracts that are typically awarded
through a competitive bid process. In the current environment, substantially all of our contracts
are being performed on a dayrate basis. Under a dayrate contract, we are paid a daily rate, which
consists of a base rate for our vessel and crews as well as cost reimbursements for materials and
ancillary activities, for as long as we provide our services. Our dayrates are determined by
prevailing market rates, vessel availability and historical rates paid by the specific customer.
Fixed-price contracts define the services that we will provide for an agreed-upon fixed price and
certain cost protections. Additional work, which is subject to customer approval, is billed
separately. Revenues received in connection with the mobilization of our vessels under new
contracts, as well as mobilization fees paid by us to vendors under contracts to charter vessels,
are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the period in which the related contract
services are provided.
We also operate a fabrication facility that supports our subsea construction and commercial
diving operations. Although this business represents a relatively small portion of our revenues,
it allows us to reduce our reliance on third-party suppliers and increase our ability to complete
projects on a timely and cost-effective basis.
Our costs of revenues are primarily a function of fleet configuration and utilization levels.
The most significant costs we incur are charter costs, labor costs and related employee benefits,
fuel, lube oil and third-party equipment rentals. A significant portion of the expenses incurred
with operating each vessel are paid for or reimbursed by our customers. These reimbursable
expenses include fuel, lube oil, meals and third-party equipment rentals. Typically, however, our
customer contracts limit the total expenses for which we may seek reimbursement. We record
reimbursements from customers as revenues and the related expenses as costs of revenues.
Our revenues are affected by drydockings of our vessels for periodic upgrade, refurbishment
and repair projects. Vessels in drydock do not earn income, and therefore our revenues will be
adversely affected during these projects. Upgrade, refurbishment and repair projects are subject
to delays and cost overruns inherent in any large construction project.
20
Our Outlook
We currently have five dynamically positioned, or DP, vessels in service: the Gulmar Condor,
the Seamec III, the Adams Surveyor, the Superior Endeavour and the Gulmar Falcon.
The Gulmar Condor and the Seamec III experienced near full utilization during the third
quarter of 2007 while working on a significant project in Trinidad for a major crude oil and
natural gas exploration and production company. We also utilize the Crossmar XIV, a 250-foot,
four-point construction barge, on the project in Trinidad under a cooperation agreement with Cross
Logistics, Inc. The Trinidad project is on a dayrate basis and is scheduled to last through the
end of 2007. We currently plan to maintain a DP vessel in Trinidad on an ongoing basis to support
future projects in that location.
The Adams Surveyor experienced a utilization rate of 82% during the third quarter of 2007 and
is currently deployed in the Gulf of Mexico. The Superior Endeavour, which was in drydock for
scheduled upgrades from early February 2007 to September 2007, has been placed back in service and
began generating revenues in October 2007. The Gulmar Falcon, which was in drydock for scheduled
upgrades from July 2007 to October 2007, has been placed back in service and began generating
revenues in November 2007.
The Toisa Puma, which is currently in drydock, has not generated any revenues for us to date
and we are engaged in a dispute with the owner of the vessel. For additional information
concerning the Toisa Puma, please read Legal Proceedings in Item 1 of Part II of this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q.
Our four-point vessels continued to experience low utilization levels during the third quarter
of 2007 and the first half of the fourth quarter of 2007, primarily due to decreased demand for
four-point surface dive vessels in the Gulf of Mexico. This decreased demand has also resulted in
a decline in average dayrates for our four-point vessels. In general, utilization and dayrates for
four-point vessels operating in the Gulf of Mexico in 2007 have continued to be low relative to
2005 and 2006 and are not expected to improve for the foreseeable future. We are currently
exploring the possibility of mobilizing some of our four-point vessels to locations outside of the
Gulf of Mexico, both within the United States and internationally. We are currently considering
several strategic options with regard to the Gulf Diver IV, including refurbishment or possible
sale. As of September 30, 2007, the book value of the Gulf Diver IV was approximately $5.6
million. Any possible financial effect of these actions is not currently determinable.
We are continuing to expand our business from shallow water operations in the Gulf of Mexico
to deepwater and international locations. We expect that approximately 75% of our revenues for the
fourth quarter of 2007 will be generated from non-hurricane-related, international operations. We
have established an office in Trinidad in response to the demand of several large exploration and
production companies operating in that area, and have opened an office in Dubai to increase our
ability to serve customers in the Middle East and Africa.
The foregoing statements concerning the fourth quarter of 2007 constitute forward-looking
statements and are subject to risks and uncertainties, including those described under the caption
Risk Factors in the IPO Prospectus. For additional information concerning forward-looking
statements, please read Forward-Looking Information below.
21
Our Fleet
The following table contains information regarding the vessels in our fleet as of November 15,
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
Placed in |
|
|
|
|
|
Clear Deck |
|
|
|
|
|
Moon Pool |
|
Crane |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Own/ |
|
or Chartered |
|
Service by |
|
Length |
|
Space |
|
|
|
|
|
Launch/ |
|
Capacity |
|
|
Flag |
|
Charter |
|
by Superior |
|
Superior |
|
(feet) (1) |
|
(sq. feet) |
|
Accommodations |
|
SAT Diving |
|
(tons) |
DP Vessels: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Superior Endeavour |
|
Vanuatu |
|
Own |
|
|
2004 |
(2) |
|
|
10/2004 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
8,600 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
Yes(3) |
|
|
50 |
|
Gulmar Falcon |
|
Panama |
|
Charter(4) |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
04/2006 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
9,235 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
Yes(3) |
|
|
30 |
|
Gulmar Condor |
|
Marshall
|
|
Charter(5) |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
07/2007 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
10,764 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
Yes(3) |
|
|
120/70 |
|
|
|
Islands |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adams Surveyor |
|
Bahrain |
|
Charter(6) |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
03/2007 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
5,084 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
No(7) |
|
|
45 |
|
Toisa Puma |
|
Liberia |
|
Charter(8) |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
4,672 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
Yes(3) |
|
|
25 |
|
Seamec III |
|
India |
|
Charter(9) |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
07/2007 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
5,124 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
Yes(3) |
|
|
50/10 |
|
Four-Point Vessels: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Diver III |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Own |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
09/2003 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
1,034 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
No |
|
|
10 |
|
Gulf Diver IV (10) |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Own |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
2,880 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
No |
|
|
15 |
|
Gulf Diver V |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Own |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
03/2006 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
3,330 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
No |
|
|
15 |
|
Gulf Diver VI |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Own |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
09/2006 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
2,890 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
No |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We measure the length of each vessel from the tip of the bow to the farthest point on the
stern. Other companies or regulatory bodies may measure vessel length differently than we do. |
|
(2) |
|
We chartered this vessel beginning in October 2004 and purchased this vessel in April 2005.
|
|
(3) |
|
This vessel is equipped with a hyperbaric rescue chamber. |
|
(4) |
|
This charter expires in March 2008, subject to options to extend the charter for up to two
additional six-month periods. |
|
(5) |
|
This charter expires in March 2009, subject to options to extend the charter for up to two
additional six-month periods. |
|
(6) |
|
This charter expires in February 2008, subject to options to extend the charter for up to two
additional six-month periods. |
|
(7) |
|
This vessel does not currently have a saturation diving system, but has positioning and
reference systems that allow the operation of either a saturation diving system or ROVs. |
|
(8) |
|
This charter expires in July 2009, subject to options to extend the charter for up to two
additional six-month periods. For additional information concerning the Toisa Puma, please
read Legal Proceedings in Item 1 of Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. |
|
(9) |
|
This charter expires in January 2008, subject to options to extend the charter for up to
three additional six-month periods. |
|
(10) |
|
This vessel has been in the shipyard for upgrade and refurbishment since we acquired it in
December 2005. For additional information concerning the Gulf Diver IV, please read Our
Outlook above. We do not expect to place this vessel in service in 2007. |
In addition to the vessels that we own or charter on a long-term basis, during periods of
significant demand we charter vessels on a short-term basis under contracts of less than six
months. We also provide diving personnel and technical expertise on vessels and platforms owned
and operated by third parties.
In June 2007, we entered into a cooperation agreement with Cross Logistics, Inc., the owner of
the Crossmar XIV, a 250-foot, four-point construction barge. The agreement expires in December
2007 and provides for us and Cross Logistics to cooperate in marketing our combined capabilities
for certain projects and to perform any resulting contracts. We and Cross Logistics also have
entered into a time charter for the Crossmar XIV pursuant to which we are currently providing
diving personnel, dive equipment, an ROV and project supervision to the vessel in connection with
our Trinidad project through the end of November 2007. The Trinidad customer is responsible for
payment of all equipment and services provided under the charter. The Crossmar XIV is outfitted
with a 140-ton crane and has clear deck space of 4,565 square feet.
We also have entered into a contract for the construction of the Superior Achiever, a
430-foot, DP III deepwater construction and dive support vessel, which we expect to place in
service in the second half of 2008. This vessel will be outfitted with a 300-ton heave-compensated
abandonment and recovery winch, a 140-ton heave-compensated crane and a 160-ton crane. The vessel
also will have both a diving moon pool and working moon pool
22
and will be equipped with a 12-man, 1,000-foot rated, multichambered saturation diving system
with hyperbaric rescue chamber, with the ability to support a 24-man, twin-bell system.
Factors Affecting Our Operations
The primary factors affecting demand for our services are crude oil and natural gas prices,
which in turn influence levels of capital spending on offshore drilling and field development. In
the last several years, crude oil prices have increased substantially, with the annual average of
the NYMEX West Texas Intermediate, or WTI, crude oil 12-month strip futures price increasing from
$28.24 per barrel in 2003 to $69.47 per barrel in 2006. Natural gas prices have been more volatile
over the same period: although the annual average of the Henry Hub natural gas 12-month strip
futures price has increased from $5.28 per one million British thermal units, or Mmbtu, in 2003 to
$8.55 per Mmbtu in 2006, the Henry Hub natural gas 12-month strip futures price has been as high as
$12.47 per Mmbtu on September 29, 2005 and as low as $4.56 per Mmbtu on January 1, 2003. As of
September 28, 2007, the NYMEX WTI crude oil 12-month strip futures price was $77.93, and the Henry
Hub natural gas 12-month strip futures price was $7.75. We are also affected by strict regulatory
policies in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, which require periodic inspections, maintenance, repair and
ultimately decommissioning of production facilities and infrastructure. Although demand for our
services typically is highly correlated with capital spending on offshore drilling and development
activities, recently our business has been influenced more significantly by the demand for
hurricane-related repair work. Presently, all of our vessels are dedicated to infrastructure
construction, inspection and repair projects.
Vessel utilization provides a good indication of demand for our vessels and, as a result, the
contract rates we may charge for our services. Our vessel utilization is typically lower during
the first quarter, and to a lesser extent the fourth quarter, due to winter weather conditions in
the Gulf of Mexico.
Another key performance measure for our business is vessel revenue days. Vessel revenue days
indicate the total number of days that the vessels in our fleet and vessels subject to short-term
charters generated revenues. Although the number of vessel revenue days related to our owned and
long-term chartered vessels has increased as we have increased the size of our fleet, the number of
vessel revenue days related to short-term charters also increased in 2006 due to the additional
vessels we chartered in that period in response to increased demand for our services following
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Vessel revenue days in the first three quarters of 2007 have suffered
because of the drydocking of the Superior Endeavour for scheduled upgrades from early February 2007
to September 2007, the drydocking of the Gulmar Falcon for scheduled upgrades from July 2007 to
October 2007, decreased demand for four-point vessels, and the successful completion of our
provision of diving services and technical expertise to the Toisa Proteus in May 2007.
The following table sets forth key indicators and performance metrics for our business:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
|
Q1 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q4 |
|
Q1 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q3 |
Number of vessels (as of end of
period) (1) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Number of vessel revenue days (2): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned and long-term charter |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
Short-term charter |
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total vessel revenue days |
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel utilization (3) |
|
|
91 |
% |
|
|
93 |
% |
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
88 |
% |
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
51 |
% |
|
|
56 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. natural gas prices (4) |
|
$ |
9.04 |
|
|
$ |
8.81 |
|
|
$ |
8.49 |
|
|
$ |
7.86 |
|
|
$ |
7.98 |
|
|
$ |
8.63 |
|
|
$ |
7.66 |
|
NYMEX crude oil prices (5) |
|
$ |
66.20 |
|
|
$ |
73.29 |
|
|
$ |
73.74 |
|
|
$ |
64.70 |
|
|
$ |
61.87 |
|
|
$ |
68.72 |
|
|
$ |
73.29 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The number of vessels as of the end of each period represents our DP and four-point vessels
owned or under long-term charter. Vessels acquired are treated as added to our fleet as of
the date we purchased the vessel. Vessels under long-term charter are treated as part of our
fleet during the term of the charter. We define long- |
23
|
|
term charters as charters of six months or longer. Our method of computation of number of vessels
may or may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. The
number of vessels as of the end of certain periods included vessels that were not in service
for those periods, as follows: |
|
(a) |
|
the first and second quarters of 2006 included the Gulf Diver IV and the Gulf
Diver VI (owned); |
|
|
(b) |
|
the third quarter of 2006 included the Gulf Diver IV (owned) and the American
Salvor (under long-term charter); |
|
|
(c) |
|
the fourth quarter of 2006 included the Gulf Diver IV (owned) and the American
Salvor and Gulmar Condor (under long-term charter); |
|
|
(d) |
|
the first quarter of 2007 included the Gulf Diver IV (owned) and the Gulmar
Condor (under long-term charter); |
|
|
(e) |
|
the second quarter of 2007 included the Gulf Diver IV and the Superior
Endeavour (owned) and the Gulmar Condor (under long-term charter); |
|
|
(f) |
|
the third quarter of 2007 included the Gulf Diver IV (owned) and the Gulmar
Falcon and the Toisa Puma (under long-term charter). |
(2) |
|
The number of vessel revenue days is the total number of days the vessels generated revenue.
Our method of computation of number of vessel revenue days may not be comparable to other
similarly titled measures of other companies. |
|
(3) |
|
Average vessel utilization is calculated by dividing the total number of days our owned or
long-term chartered vessels generated revenues by the total number of days the vessels were
available for service in each period and does not reflect days during the period between the
dates vessels were acquired and initially placed in service and days vessels were in drydock
for regulatory-related inspections and maintenance. Our method of computation of vessel
utilization may or may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other
companies. |
|
(4) |
|
Quarterly average of the Henry Hub natural gas 12-month strip futures price (dollars per
Mmbtu). |
|
(5) |
|
Quarterly average of NYMEX WTI crude oil 12-month strip futures price (dollars per barrel). |
Recent Events
On October 18, 2007, we entered into an agreement and plan of merger with Ocean Flow
International L.L.C. (Ocean Flow) pursuant to which we agreed to acquire, through a wholly owned
subsidiary, all of the outstanding membership interests of Ocean Flow, a privately held deepwater
subsea project engineering and management services firm. The consideration for the merger consists
of 1,283,587 shares of our common stock, which will be issued pursuant to an exemption from
registration under Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The merger is
scheduled to close by the end of November 2007 and is subject to customary conditions, including,
among others, the following: (1) the accuracy of the representations and warranties made by each
party; (2) obtaining certain consents and approvals; and (3) the absence of any material adverse
change in the business, condition, prospects, properties or results of operations of Ocean Flow.
The agreement contains customary termination rights.
Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies
Critical accounting policies are those that are important to our results of operations,
financial condition and cash flows and require managements most difficult, subjective or complex
judgments. Different amounts would be reported under alternative assumptions. We have evaluated
the accounting policies used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements and
related notes appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We apply those accounting
policies that we believe best reflect the underlying business and economic events, consistent with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. We believe that our policies are
generally consistent with those used by other companies in our industry.
We periodically update the estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial
statements based on our latest assessment of the current and projected business and general
economic environment. Our significant accounting policies are summarized in Note 2 to our
consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006 included in our IPO
Prospectus. There have been no material changes or developments in authoritative accounting
pronouncements or in our evaluation of the accounting estimates and the underlying assumptions or
methodologies that we believe to be Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies as disclosed in our
IPO Prospectus.
24
Major Customers and Concentration of Credit Risk
Our customers consist primarily of large crude oil and natural gas exploration and production,
gathering and transmission companies and deepwater construction companies. Customers accounting
for more than 10% of consolidated revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007
and 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
Customer |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Customer A |
|
|
69 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Customer B |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
Customer C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
Customer D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Customer E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Customer F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
% |
The amount of revenue accounted for by a customer depends on the level of construction
services we perform for the customer, which is based on the size of the customers capital
expenditure budget and our ability to bid for and obtain the project. The capital expenditures of
our customers are generally dependent on their views of future crude oil and natural gas prices and
successful offshore drilling activity. Consequently, customers who account for a significant
portion of our revenues in one year may represent an immaterial portion of revenues in subsequent
years. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and provide allowances for probable
credit losses when necessary. As we have increased our focus on providing services in
international locations, the composition of our customers has shifted as compared to prior periods.
As of September 30, 2007, one customer accounted for 66% of total billed and unbilled
receivables. At December 31, 2006, three customers accounted for 50% of total billed and unbilled
receivables. Accounts receivable related to these customers totaled approximately $42.8 million
and $28.0 million at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.
Seasonality
Our vessel utilization typically is lower during the first quarter, and to a lesser extent
during the fourth quarter, due to winter weather conditions in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Due to
this seasonality, full year results are unlikely to be a direct multiple of any particular quarter
or combination of quarters. DP vessels, however, are less affected by adverse weather conditions;
as we perform more of our services from DP vessels, we expect that our operations will become less
susceptible to seasonal weather fluctuations.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
Prior to 2007, we had not granted stock-based awards to our executive officers or employees.
However, during 2007 we have granted certain stock-based awards under our 2007 Stock Incentive Plan
as follows (number of shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock |
|
Stock Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price on |
|
Vesting |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Vesting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of |
|
Period |
|
Number of |
|
Exercise |
|
Period |
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
Grant |
|
(years) |
|
Shares |
|
Price |
|
(years) |
April 2007 (1)
|
|
|
2,163 |
|
|
$ |
15.00 |
|
|
|
3.0/4.5 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
$ |
15.00 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
May 2007
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
18.21 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
18.13 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
July 2007
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
18.30 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 2007
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
13.77 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
13.77 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
25
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The grant date with respect to the restricted stock and stock options was April
16, 2007, prior to the completion of our initial public offering. |
Stock options and restricted shares are granted at the market price of our common stock on the
date of grant. Stock options vest in equal increments over four years, and restricted stock is
generally subject to graded vesting over three or four-and-one-half years. The awards generally
expire ten years from the date of grant.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payments, requires an entity
to recognize compensation expense in connection with share-based payments granted to employees,
including restricted stock and stock options. Compensation expense is based on the fair value of
the award on the date of grant and is recognized on a straight-line basis, net of related
forfeitures, over the requisite service period of the award, generally the vesting period. The
fair value of restricted stock is based on the market price of our common stock on the date of
grant. The fair value of stock options is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes
option pricing model which includes various assumptions.
Compensation expense, net of tax, was $2.1 million and $3.6 million for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. After giving effect to the acceleration of the
outstanding equity-based awards made to R. Joshua Koch, Jr., our former Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary, and Patrice Chemin, our former Chief Operating Officer and Executive
Vice President of Africa and Middle East, pursuant to their respective separation agreements
entered into October 2007, we estimate that our remaining compensation expense, net of tax, from
the recognition of share-based compensation for outstanding awards will be approximately $5.2
million in the fourth quarter of 2007, $5.5 million in 2008, $5.5 million in 2009, $4.3 million in
2010 and $2.4 million in 2011.
The foregoing estimates constitute forward-looking statements and are subject to risks and
uncertainties. The actual future costs and timing of share-based payments could differ materially
from these estimates. For more information regarding stock-based awards and our 2007 stock
incentive plan, please read Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
The body of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States is commonly referred
to as GAAP. A non-GAAP financial measure is generally defined by the SEC as one that purports to
measure historical or future financial performance, financial position or cash flows, but excludes
or includes amounts that would not be so adjusted in the most comparable GAAP measures. In this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we disclose EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure. EBITDA is
calculated as interest expense, net of capitalized interest, provision (benefit) for income
taxes and depreciation and amortization.
EBITDA is included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q because our management believes that
EBITDA is a useful tool for measuring our ability to meet our future debt service, capital
expenditures and working capital requirements, and we and our investors commonly use EBITDA to
measure our ability to service indebtedness.
EBITDA is not a substitute for the GAAP measure of cash flow and is not necessarily a measure
of our ability to fund our cash needs. In addition, it should be noted that companies calculate
EBITDA differently and, therefore, EBITDA as presented for us may not be comparable to EBITDA
reported by other companies. EBITDA has material limitations as a performance measure because it
excludes interest expense, provision for income taxes and depreciation and amortization.
EBITDA for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 was approximately $7.8 million
and $22.8 million, respectively, and EBITDA for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006
was approximately $7.0 million and $61.7 million, respectively. The following table reconciles
EBITDA with our net cash provided by (used in) operating activities.
26
Reconciliation of EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
7,792 |
|
|
$ |
22,752 |
|
|
$ |
7,022 |
|
|
$ |
61,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
interest expense, net of capitalized interest |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
(203 |
) |
|
|
(715 |
) |
Less: benefit (provision) for income taxes |
|
|
(1,978 |
) |
|
|
(8,007 |
) |
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
(21,056 |
) |
Plus: gain (loss) on disposal of assets |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
Plus: provision for bad debt expense |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
2,094 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
Plus: stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
3,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: increase in accounts receivable |
|
|
(29,762 |
) |
|
|
(3,589 |
) |
|
|
(15,627 |
) |
|
|
(25,198 |
) |
Less: increase in inventory |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(301 |
) |
Less:
(increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(1,238 |
) |
|
|
(1,519 |
) |
|
|
(6,980 |
) |
|
|
(2,674 |
) |
Plus: (decrease) increase in accounts payable and
accrued expenses |
|
|
25,524 |
|
|
|
(955 |
) |
|
|
14,796 |
|
|
|
1,203 |
|
Plus: (decrease) increase in income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,950 |
|
|
|
(13,250 |
) |
|
|
10,097 |
|
Plus: increase in other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
Plus: (decrease) increase in deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,981 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
(349 |
) |
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
$ |
5,808 |
|
|
$ |
12,527 |
|
|
$ |
(6,488 |
) |
|
$ |
24,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
Number of vessel revenue days(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned and long-term charter |
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
929 |
|
Short-term charter |
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total vessel revenue days |
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
1,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
75.5 |
|
|
$ |
64.4 |
|
|
$ |
171.7 |
|
|
$ |
174.4 |
|
Cost of revenues (excluding depreciation and amortization) |
|
|
55.6 |
|
|
|
36.7 |
|
|
|
131.2 |
|
|
|
98.2 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
39.0 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
Non operating expenses (income) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
21.1 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
37.7 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The number of vessel revenue days is the total number of days the vessels generated revenue.
Our method of computation of number of vessel revenue days may or may not be comparable to
other similarly titled measures of other companies. |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 versus the Three Months Ended September 30, 2006
Revenues. Revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2007 were $75.5 million compared
with $64.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $11.1 million.
Our total vessel revenue days were 631 in the third quarter of 2007 compared with 577 in the third
quarter of 2006. Our owned and long-term charter vessel revenue days were 307 in the third quarter
of 2007 compared with 330 in the third quarter of 2006, and our short-term charter vessel revenue
days were 324 in the third quarter of 2007 compared with 247 in the third quarter of 2006. The
increase in our revenues from the three months ended September 30, 2006 to the three months ended
September 30, 2007 was mainly due to our Trinidad project, which commenced early in the third
quarter of 2007. In addition, our revenues in the third quarter of 2007 were favorably affected by
continued provision of diving personnel and technical expertise on vessels and platforms owned and
operated by third parties. Revenues were negatively affected by the drydocking of the Superior
Endeavour for scheduled upgrades beginning in early February 2007 and the drydocking of the Gulmar
Falcon for scheduled upgrades beginning in July 2007, which collectively resulted in a loss of
approximately 154 vessel revenue days in the third quarter of 2007. We placed the Superior
Endeavour and the Gulmar Falcon back in service in September 2007 and October 2007, respectively.
The Superior Endeavour, despite reentering service in the third quarter of 2007, did not generate
revenues until early October, while the Gulmar Falcon did not generate revenues until early
November. Revenues relating to our fabrication facility for the three months ended September 30,
2007 were $2.5 million compared with $2.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, a
decrease of $0.3 million, due to a decrease in the number of Gulf of Mexico projects requiring
fabrication.
Costs of Revenues (excluding depreciation and amortization). Costs of revenues consist mainly
of vessel charter costs, labor costs and related employee benefits, fuel and third-party equipment
rentals. Costs of revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2007 were $55.6 million
compared with $36.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $18.9
million. This increase was substantially due to increased third party equipment and vessel rentals
and related mobilization of $36.0 million in the third quarter of 2007 compared with $19.4 million
for the third quarter of 2006. In addition, labor costs and related employee benefits costs were
$14.8 million for the three months ended September 2007 compared with $8.4 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2006, due to the addition of our foreign subsidiaries. Increased
downtime for certain of our vessels due to equipment upgrades or low utilization also contributed
to higher costs, as these vessels were unable to generate sufficient revenues to offset labor and
other operating costs associated with the vessels.
28
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses consist of selling, general and administrative costs
not directly related to a specific project or job, depreciation and amortization, disposal of
assets, insurance and bad debt expense. Operating expenses for the three months ended September
30, 2007 were $14.5 million compared with $5.8 million for the three months ended September 30,
2006, an increase of $8.7 million. This increase was attributable to several factors: salaries,
labor costs and related employee benefits increased $2.1 million due to increases in salaries and
the size of our staff; stock-based compensation increased $3.3 million due to awards made under the
2007 stock incentive plan; professional fees increased $1.7 million due to reporting and other
obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as well as compliance with the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Non-Operating Expenses. Interest income, net for the three months ended September 30, 2007
was $0.2 million. Interest expense, net for the three months ended September 30, 2006 was $0.2
million.
Provision for Income Taxes. Provision for income taxes for the three months ended September
30, 2007 was $2.0 million compared with $8.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006,
a decrease of $6.0 million. This decrease was due to lower profitability. Our effective tax rate
was 35.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 36.9% for the three months ended
September 30, 2006.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 versus the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
Revenues. Revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 were $171.7 million compared
with $174.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, a decrease of $2.7 million. Our
total vessel revenue days were 1,597 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared with
1,988 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Our owned and long-term charter vessel revenue
days were 737 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared with 929 for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006, and our short-term charter vessel revenue days were 860 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 compared with 1,059 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
The net decrease in owned and long-term charter vessel revenue days is partially attributable to
the drydocking of the Superior Endeavour for scheduled upgrades beginning in early February 2007
and the drydocking of the Gulmar Falcon for scheduled upgrades beginning in July 2007, which
collectively resulted in a loss of approximately 272 vessel revenue days for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007. We placed the Superior Endeavour and the Gulmar Falcon back in service in
September 2007 and October 2007, respectively. Significantly lower utilization of our four-point
vessels due to decreased demand in the Gulf of Mexico also contributed to the decrease in revenues
in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
We experienced higher utilization of our four-point vessels for the nine months ended September
30, 2006 than we would normally expect because certain customers paid us standby rates to ensure
that our vessels were available to make significant hurricane related repairs as weather improved.
Our revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 were favorably affected by our Trinidad
project, which commenced early in the third quarter of 2007, and our continued provision of diving
personnel and technical expertise on vessels and platforms owned and operated by third parties.
The drydocking of the Superior Endeavour and the decrease of short-term charters in the first nine
months of 2007 caused a shift in the composition of revenue days, which in combination with lower
activity levels resulted in lower operating margins than achieved for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006. Revenues relating to our fabrication facility for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 were $5.5 million compared with $10.6 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006, a decrease of $5.1 million, due to a decrease in the number of Gulf of Mexico
projects requiring fabrication.
Costs of Revenues (excluding depreciation and amortization). Costs of revenues consist mainly
of vessel charter costs, labor costs and related employee benefits, fuel and third-party equipment
rentals. Costs of revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 were $131.2 million
compared with $98.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $33.0
million. This increase was due to an increase in labor costs and related employee benefits in
connection with the addition of employees of our foreign subsidiaries, a write-off of $1.0 million
relating to tax withholding expense with respect to a foreign-owned vessel, and $0.7 million in
charges relating to the Toisa Puma, for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared with
the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Increased downtime for certain of our vessels due to
equipment upgrades or low utilization also contributed to higher costs, as these vessels were
unable to generate sufficient revenues to offset labor and other operating costs associated with
the vessels.
29
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses consist of selling, general and administrative costs
not directly related to a specific project or job, depreciation and amortization, disposal of
assets, insurance and bad debt expense. Operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 were $39.0 million compared with approximately $16.8 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006, an increase of $22.2 million. This increase was attributable to several
factors: salaries, labor costs and related employee benefits increased $5.5 million; stock-based
compensation increased $5.5 million due to awards made under the 2007 stock incentive plan;
professional fees increased $4.5 million mainly due to reporting and other obligations under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as well as compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; and bad debt
expense increased $1.6 million due to a write-off associated with one customer of $1.8 million. In
addition, we incurred $0.8 million in connection with the relocation of our headquarters to
Houston.
Non-Operating Expenses (Income). Interest income, net for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 was $0.7 million. Interest expense, net for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was $0.6
million. Loss on extinguishment of debt was $3.9 million due to the write-off of debt issuance
costs upon the early payment of the senior secured term loan.
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes. Provision (benefit) for income taxes for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 was ($0.6) million compared with $21.1 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006, a decrease of $21.7 million. This decrease was due to lower
profitability. Our effective tax rate was 35.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and
35.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows
The principal uses of cash in our business have been investments in our assets, particularly
for the acquisition of vessels, the subsequent refurbishment and upgrade of newly acquired vessels
and the enhancement of our existing vessels, and funding working capital, losses from operations
and repayment of debt. Cash to fund the needs of our business has been provided primarily by
operations, our initial public offering and debt financing.
We had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $7.5 million as of September 30, 2007, an
increase of approximately $4.9 million from December 31, 2006. The primary sources of cash for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 were $141.5 million provided by financing activities. The
primary uses of cash for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 were $117.7 million for capital
expenditures, $6.5 million used by operating activities, $11.4 million deposited in a segregated
account and in escrow to secure letters of credit required for the construction of the Superior
Achiever and for other capital projects and charter agreements, and $2.4 million, net to acquire
Subtech Diving and Marine. Major capital projects during the nine months ended September 30, 2007
included expenditures for the construction of the Superior Achiever, upgrades to the Superior
Endeavour, the enhancement of existing vessels and the acquisition of diving equipment, including
equipment relating to saturation diving systems.
On April 25, 2007, we completed our initial public offering of 11,691,667 shares of our common
stock, par value $0.01 per share, including 8,666,667 shares sold by us and 3,025,000 shares sold
by selling stockholders. We received net proceeds from the initial public offering, after
deducting the underwriting discount and expenses of the offering, of $118.0 million. On April 25,
2007, we:
|
|
|
repaid in full our senior secured term loan using approximately $68.4 million of the
proceeds from our initial public offering and approximately $43.5 million of the
proceeds from our senior secured term loan that were held in a segregated account; |
|
|
|
|
used approximately $6.6 million of the proceeds from our initial public offering to
repay outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit facility; and |
|
|
|
|
used $28.0 million of the proceeds from our initial public offering to pay a special
cash dividend to our existing stockholders. |
30
We
used the remaining approximately $17.9 million of the proceeds from our initial public
offering on capital expenditures during the three months ended June 30, 2007.
On June 20, 2007, we entered into a senior secured term loan facility with a syndicate of
financial institutions led by Fortis Capital Corp., as administrative agent. We received $25.0
million of proceeds from the senior secured term loan facility. We used the proceeds to pay $9.3
million towards our 2006 federal tax liability, $2.0 million towards our 2007 federal tax liability
and $13.7 million for general corporate purposes.
Capital Expenditures
During the first nine months of 2007, we spent approximately $117.7 million on capital
expenditures related to the construction of the Superior Achiever and related equipment as well as
refurbishments and upgrades to our fleet and other items. We currently intend to spend an
additional $17.1 million in the last three months of 2007 for capital expenditures related to the
construction of the Superior Achiever, refurbishments and upgrades to our fleet and other items.
In addition, we expect remaining total capital expenditures related to the construction of the
Superior Achiever and related equipment in 2008 to be approximately $38.6 million.
From time to time, we may review possible acquisitions of vessels, equipment or businesses,
joint ventures, mergers or other business combinations. We may not, however, be successful in our
acquisition efforts. If we do complete any such acquisitions, we may make significant capital
commitments for such purposes. Any such transactions could involve the payment by us of a
substantial amount of cash. We likely would fund the cash portion of such transactions, if any,
through cash balances on hand, the incurrence of additional debt, sales of assets, equity interests
or other securities or a combination thereof. If we acquire additional vessels, equipment or other
assets, we would expect that the ongoing capital expenditures for our company as a whole would
increase to maintain our vessels and equipment.
Our ability to fund capital expenditures would be adversely affected if conditions deteriorate
in our business or industry, we experience poor results in our operations or we fail to meet
covenants under our credit facility.
Liquidity Needs
Our business requires substantial capital to fund our vessel construction obligations and
vessel charter obligations as well as our ongoing capital expenditure program. As of September 30,
2007, payments due on our contractual obligations during the next twelve months were approximately
$200.0 million. Of such amount, scheduled payments of 6,173,500 (or $8,010,116) must be paid to
the builder of the Superior Achiever on December 27, 2007 and January 2, 2008. We also expect to
make significant additional capital expenditures over the next twelve months.
We had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $7.5 million as of September 30, 2007. We
have a senior secured credit facility that provides for up to $30.0 million in revolving credit
loans, $14.3 million of which was outstanding as of September 30, 2007. Our borrowing base
capacity, which is affected by the composition of our eligible domestic and foreign accounts
receivable, was not sufficient to enable us to borrow significant additional funds under our
existing senior facility at September 30, 2007. We are pursuing a new revolving credit facility
that we believe would better accommodate the continuing expansion of our business into deepwater
and international locations and provide greater liquidity and borrowing base capacity than is
available under our existing senior secured credit facility.
We also have a senior secured term loan facility that provides for up to $60.0 million in term
loans. We had $55.0 million outstanding under this senior secured term loan facility as of
September 30, 2007, and we currently do not have the ability to borrow any additional funds under
that facility. We are negotiating a term loan facility with an alternative lender to refinance our
existing senior secured term loan facility and to increase our ability to borrow. We anticipate entering into this new term loan facility in the fourth quarter of 2007;
however, we may not be able to enter into a new facility on a timely basis or on terms that are
acceptable to us and within the limitations contained in the documentation contained in our
existing debt instruments. If we are unable to obtain a written commitment for a replacement term loan facility on or before
November 30, 2007, or if we do not close on a new term loan by
December 21, 2007, we will be in default under our existing term loan facility and the lender
under our existing term loan facility will have the right to
require us to repay all of the outstanding debt under
that facility.
31
We believe that our current cash on hand and our cash flow from operations for the next twelve
months, together with availability under our senior secured credit facility and our replacement
term loan facility that we expect to enter into in the fourth quarter of 2007,
will be adequate during such period to meet our working capital
requirements, to make our planned capital expenditures, to repay our debts as they become due and
otherwise to operate our business. Nevertheless, our ability to fund planned capital expenditures,
vessel charter obligations and to make payments on our indebtedness in the future will depend on
our ability to generate cash, which is subject to general economic, financial, competitive,
legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control, and our ability to enter
into a replacement term loan with additional availability. Our future cash flows may be insufficient to
meet all of our debt obligations and commitments, and any insufficiency could negatively impact our
business.
To
the extent we are unable to enter into a new replacement term loan facility or to repay our
indebtedness as it becomes due or at maturity with cash on hand or from other sources, we will need
to refinance our debt, sell assets or repay the debt with the proceeds from equity
offerings. Additional indebtedness or equity financing may not be available to us in the future
for the refinancing or repayment of existing indebtedness, or if available, such additional
indebtedness or equity financing may not be available on a timely basis, on terms acceptable to us
and within the limitations contained in the documentation contained in our existing debt
instruments. In addition, we can provide no assurance as to the timing of any asset sales or the
proceeds that could be realized by us from any such asset sale. Failure to obtain appropriate
financing or additional indebtedness or to conclude any asset sales, should the need develop, could
impair our ability to meet our working capital requirements, to make our planned capital
expenditures, to repay our debts as they become due and otherwise to operate our business.
Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt outstanding at September 30, 2007, including current maturities, was $59.2
million.
Senior Secured Term Loan. In June 2007, we entered into a senior secured term loan facility
(the Term Loan Facility) with a syndicate of financial institutions led by Fortis Capital Corp.,
as administrative agent. The Term Loan Facility provides for up to $60.0 million in term loans.
The Term Loan Facility is available for multiple borrowings in minimum amounts of $5.0 million
beginning on June 20, 2007 through December 31, 2008. Amounts borrowed and repaid may not be
reborrowed. Any commitments not drawn prior to December 31, 2008 will be cancelled. As of
September 30, 2007, $55.0 million was outstanding under the Term Loan Facility.
Borrowings under the Term Loan Facility bear interest, at our option, at either:
|
|
|
a base rate equal to the greater of |
|
- |
|
the federal funds effective rate, plus 0.50%; and |
|
|
- |
|
the prime lending rate; |
|
|
|
plus a spread equal to 1.00% per annum, or |
|
|
|
the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), plus a spread equal to 3.25% per annum. |
We are obligated to pay the lenders certain fees on the average daily unadvanced portion of
the lenders loan commitments.
Borrowings under the Term Loan Facility must be repaid in 19 equal quarterly installments,
commencing in March 2009, of 3.75% of the amount outstanding on December 31, 2008, with the balance
payable in December 2013. Borrowings under the Term Loan Facility are subject to mandatory
prepayment (1) with 35% of our excess cash flow
32
in any fiscal quarter, commencing with the quarter ending after the Superior Achiever is
placed in service and (2) with the proceeds of certain issuances of debt or equity or asset sales,
as defined in the agreement governing the Term Loan Facility (the Term Loan Agreement).
The Term Loan Facility is secured by (1) a perfected first priority security interest in all
of our vessels, equipment and other tangible assets, and (2) a perfected second priority security
interest in our accounts receivable and inventory that are pledged in connection with the senior
secured credit facility described under Senior Secured Credit Facility below.
The Term Loan Agreement contains covenants that include, among others:
|
|
|
the maintenance of a ratio of consolidated total debt (as defined in the Term Loan
Agreement) to consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the Term Loan Agreement) of no greater
than 2.0 to 1.0 (the Consolidated Leverage Ratio); |
|
|
|
|
the maintenance of a ratio of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated interest expense
(as defined in the Term Loan Agreement) of at least 5.0 to 1.0; |
|
|
|
|
the maintenance of a ratio of appraised fair market value of vessels (as defined in
the Term Loan Agreement) and related equipment pledged as collateral to outstanding
borrowings under the senior secured term loan facility of at least 1.20 to 1.0 until
December 31, 2008 and 2.0 to 1.0 thereafter; |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on incurring indebtedness, including certain capital lease, guarantee
and charter obligations; |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on incurring liens on certain of our property and the property of our
subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on selling assets or inventory outside the ordinary course of business; |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on capital expenditures (as defined in the Term Loan Agreement); |
|
|
|
|
prohibitions on entering into sale and leaseback transactions; and |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on transactions with affiliates and materially changing our business. |
The Term Loan Agreement also includes customary events of default, which include our failure
to make a payment in respect of certain indebtedness other than the Term Loan Facility in excess of
$2.5 million, or the occurrence of an event of default resulting in or permitting the acceleration
of such indebtedness. If a default occurs and is continuing, we may be required to repay all
amounts outstanding under the Term Loan Facility.
We are currently in compliance with the
covenants contained in the Term Loan Agreement, other than the Consolidated Leverage Ratio for the
quarter ended September 30, 2007 and the restrictions on capital expenditures for fiscal 2007. In
November 2007, we obtained a waiver from the lender with respect to compliance with these covenants
through the earlier of (1) December 31, 2007 and (2) the waiver termination date, which is
defined as (a) November 30, 2007, if we have not received a written commitment from an alternative
lender to refinance the Term Loan Facility by that date (the
Commitment Letter) on terms and conditions satisfactory
to the administrative agent in its sole discretion, (b) December 7, 2007, if the administrative agent under
the senior secured credit facility has not consented to the
refinancing of the Term Loan Facility in full in the terms and
conditions described in the Commitment Letter,
(c) December 21, 2007, if the Term Loan Facility has not been refinanced by that date, (d) the date
on which any waiver of events of default under the senior secured credit facility ceases to be in
full force and effect for any reason, (e) the date on which we fail to make a payment when due with
respect to the construction of the Superior Achiever and (f) the date on which any event of default
under the Term Loan Agreement, other than the existing defaults described above, occurs.
The
outstanding balance of $55.0 million under the Term Loan Facility was classified as current
debt in the consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2007. Due to our non-compliance with
certain covenants contained in the Term Loan Agreement, the debt is callable after November 30,
2007 if we do not obtain a written commitment for a replacement term loan facility with an
alternate lender by that time. We are currently negotiating a term loan facility with an alternate
lender to refinance the existing Term Loan Facility and to increase our ability to borrow.
Senior Secured Credit Facility. In February 2007, we entered into a senior secured credit
facility with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. As amended in June 2007, the senior secured credit
facility provides for $30.0 million in revolving credit loans, which must be repaid by February
2010. The amount from time to time available under the senior secured credit facility may not
exceed the sum of up to 85% of our eligible accounts receivable less reserves
33
established by the administrative agent in its permitted discretion, as that term is described
in the credit agreement. As amended in June 2007, the senior secured credit facility also includes
availability for letters of credit in an amount not to exceed $25.0 million.
In August 2007, we entered into an amendment to the senior secured credit facility that, among
other things, provides that at our request, the administrative agent may in its sole discretion
make revolving loans to us, in amounts that exceed availability (as defined in the agreement
governing the senior secured credit facility (the Credit Facility Agreement)) (any such excess
revolving loan, an Overadvance). The amendment also provides that no Overadvance may remain
outstanding for more than 30 days, and no Overadvance may cause any revolving lenders revolving
exposure (as defined in the Credit Facility Agreement) to exceed its revolving commitment (as
defined in the Credit Facility Agreement). In addition, the amendment provides that our ratio of
EBITDA minus the unfinanced portion of capital expenditures to fixed charges may not be less than
0.80 to 1.0 for the quarter ending September 30, 2007.
In August 2007, we entered into an amendment to our senior secured credit facility that, among
other things, provides for revolving credit loans in an aggregate amount up to $15.0 million that
will be secured by a first priority lien on our eligible foreign accounts receivable and guaranteed
by the Export-Import Bank of the United States (the Foreign Loan). Amounts borrowed under the
Foreign Loan would be counted towards, and would not be in addition to, the up to $30.0 million
available under the existing revolving credit facility. The Foreign Loan will expire in February
2008. Borrowings under the Foreign Loan bear interest at LIBOR plus a spread ranging from 1.50% to
2.00%, subject to a performance-based grid.
The proceeds of the senior secured credit facility may be used for our general corporate
purposes, including vessel construction costs and refinancing of certain existing indebtedness.
All borrowings under the senior secured credit facility, other than with respect to the
Foreign Loan, bear interest, at our option, at either:
|
|
|
a base rate equal to the higher of: |
|
- |
|
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.s prime rate, and |
|
|
- |
|
the federal funds effective rate plus 0.5%, |
|
|
|
plus a spread subject to a performance-based grid, or |
|
|
|
|
LIBOR (as adjusted for statutory reserve requirements for eurocurrency liabilities)
plus a spread ranging from 1.75% to 2.25%, subject to a performance based grid. |
We are obligated to pay the lenders certain fees on the average daily unadvanced portion of
the lenders loan commitments, and certain fees for issuance of letters of credit.
Borrowings under the senior secured credit facility are subject to mandatory prepayment (1)
with the proceeds of certain asset sales, (2) with the proceeds of certain sales of our equity
securities, (3) with the proceeds from certain debt issuances, and (4) with any insurance proceeds
received in excess of $0.5 million with respect to the collateral, subject, in each case, to
certain exceptions.
The senior secured credit facility is secured by (1) a perfected first priority lien on our
accounts receivable and inventory, and (2) a perfected second priority lien on all of our assets,
other than accounts receivable and inventory.
34
The Credit Facility Agreement contains covenants that include, among others:
|
|
|
the maintenance of a ratio of consolidated total debt (as defined in the Credit
Facility Agreement) to consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Facility
Agreement) of no greater than 2.0 to 1.0 (the Consolidated Leverage Ratio); |
|
|
|
|
the maintenance of a ratio of EBITDA minus the unfinanced portion of capital
expenditures to fixed charges (the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio) of at least 1.2 to
1.0; |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on incurring indebtedness, including certain capital lease, guarantee
and charter obligations; |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on incurring liens on certain of our property and the property of our
subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on selling assets or inventory outside the ordinary course of business; |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on capital expenditures (as defined in the Credit Facility Agreement); |
|
|
|
|
prohibitions on entering into sale and leaseback transactions; and |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on transactions with affiliates and materially changing our business. |
In August 2007, we amended the senior secured credit facility to allow us to maintain a Fixed
Charge Coverage Ratio of at least 0.8 to 1.0 for the quarter ended September 30, 2007.
The Credit Facility Agreement also includes customary events of default, which include our
failure to make a payment in respect of certain indebtedness other than the senior secured credit
facility in excess of $2.5 million, or the occurrence of an event resulting in or permitting the
acceleration of such indebtedness. If a default occurs and is continuing, we may be required to
repay all amounts outstanding under the senior secured credit facility.
We are currently in compliance with the covenants contained in the Credit Facility Agreement,
as amended, other than the maintenance of the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio and the Leverage Ratio
for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 and the restrictions on capital expenditures for fiscal
2007. In November 2007, we obtained a waiver from the lender with respect to compliance with these
covenants for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 and amended the Credit Facility Agreement to
allow us to maintain a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, determined for any period of four consecutive
fiscal quarters, of at least 1.2 to 1.0 as of the end of each fiscal quarter, provided that the
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio for the fiscal quarter ending on (1) December 2007, the calculation of
the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio will be for the fiscal quarter beginning October 1, 2007, (2) March
2008, the calculation of the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio will be for the two immediately preceding
fiscal quarters ending as of March 2008 and (3) June 2008, the calculation of the Fixed Charge
Coverage Ratio will be for the three immediately preceding fiscal
quarters ending as of June 2008. The amendment to the Credit Facility Agreement also allows us to maintain a Consolidated
Leverage Ratio as of the last day of any period of four consecutive fiscal quarters of at least
2.75 to 1.0, provided that the Consolidated Leverage Ratio as of the last day of the four
consecutive fiscal quarters ending on March 31, 2008 may not exceed 3.0 to 1.0. Finally, the amendment to the Credit Facility Agreement permits
us to make up to $75 million of capital expenditures during fiscal 2007 and $40 million of capital
expenditures during each fiscal year thereafter, excluding permitted capital expenditures related to the
Superior Achiever and related equipment to the extent financed
or refinanced with certain term debt.
35
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than |
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total |
|
|
1 Year |
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
3-5 Years |
|
|
5 Years |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Long-term debt obligations,
including current maturities |
|
$ |
59,245 |
|
|
$ |
58,877 |
|
|
$ |
269 |
|
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Line of credit obligations |
|
|
14,299 |
|
|
|
14,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel construction obligations (1) |
|
|
51,950 |
|
|
|
51,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel charter obligations |
|
|
91,168 |
|
|
|
64,445 |
|
|
|
26,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
|
3,570 |
|
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
1,852 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations |
|
|
9,100 |
|
|
|
9,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
229,332 |
|
|
$ |
199,956 |
|
|
$ |
28,844 |
|
|
$ |
532 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These amounts represent our obligations relating to the construction of the Superior Achiever
as of September 30, 2007. The total estimated construction cost of the Superior Achiever,
including equipment and change orders made to date, is expected to be approximately $123.1
million. As of November 1, 2007, we have paid the shipbuilder 47.6 million (or approximately
$61.9 million) and equipment vendors approximately $9.3 million in connection with the
construction of the Superior Achiever. The total estimated future capital expenditures for
the construction of this vessel as of November 1, 2007 are expected to be approximately $51.9
million. We also may expend significant additional capital, currently estimated at up to
$10.0 million, to enable the vessel to perform most full-field development services, including
deepwater small-diameter pipelay and umbilical installation. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Forward-Looking Information
Certain statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking
statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be,
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include information concerning our possible
or assumed future business and financial performance and results of operations, including
statements about the following subjects:
|
|
|
our strategy, including the expansion and growth of our operations and our ability
to make future acquisitions on attractive terms; |
|
|
|
|
our plans, expectations and any effects of capitalizing on market conditions
in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, expanding the breadth of services in our core market,
expanding our deepwater capabilities, pursuing international growth opportunities and
expanding our fabrication capabilities; |
|
|
|
|
the duration of, and our expected results from, the Trinidad project and our plans
to expand our operations in Trinidad; |
|
|
|
|
our plans to provide services in the Middle East and Africa; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to enter into new contracts for subsea construction and commercial
diving services and future utilization rates and contract rates for our vessels; |
|
|
|
|
the correlation between demand for our services and customers expectations of
energy prices; |
36
|
|
|
future capital expenditures, including payment of the remaining liability
relating to the Subtech acquisition and estimated costs for the construction of the
Superior Achiever and the equipment necessary to enable the Superior Achiever to
perform deepwater small-diameter pipelay and umbilical installation; |
|
|
|
|
expected drydocking schedules and the dates vessels and equipment will be placed in
service; |
|
|
|
|
expected delivery of the Superior Achiever; |
|
|
|
|
the planned specifications of the Superior Achiever; |
|
|
|
|
the capabilities of our vessels following scheduled upgrades and refurbishments; |
|
|
|
|
our expected results of operations for the fourth quarter of 2007; |
|
|
|
|
expected sources of revenues in the fourth quarter of 2007; |
|
|
|
|
sufficiency of funds for required capital expenditures, working capital and debt
service; |
|
|
|
|
plans regarding additional financing arrangements; |
|
|
|
|
liabilities under laws and regulations protecting the environment; |
|
|
|
|
expected outcomes of litigation, claims and disputes and their expected effects on
our financial condition and results of operations; |
|
|
|
|
expectations regarding improvements in diving and offshore construction activity;
demand for our services, including the provision of diving resources and technical
expertise on vessels and platforms owned and operated by third parties; operating
revenues; operating and maintenance expense; insurance expense and deductibles;
interest expense; debt level; and other matters with regard to the outlook of our
business and industry; and |
|
|
|
|
expectations of future stock-based compensation expense. |
We have based these statements on our assumptions and analyses in light of our experience and
perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors
we believe are appropriate in the circumstances. Forward-looking statements by their nature
involve substantial risks and uncertainties that could significantly affect expected results, and
actual future results could differ materially from those described in such statements. Although it
is not possible to identify all factors, we continue to face many risks and uncertainties. Among
the factors that could cause actual future results to differ materially are the risks and
uncertainties described under the caption Risk Factors in our IPO Prospectus and the following:
|
|
|
crude oil and natural gas prices, and industry expectations about future prices; |
|
|
|
|
demand for subsea construction and commercial diving services; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to enter into and the terms of future contracts; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of governmental laws and regulations; |
|
|
|
|
the adequacy of sources of liquidity; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to enter into and the terms of future financing
arrangements; |
|
|
|
|
uncertainties relating to the level of activity in offshore crude oil and natural
gas exploration, development and production; |
37
|
|
|
competition and market conditions in the subsea construction and commercial diving
industry; |
|
|
|
|
the availability of skilled personnel; |
|
|
|
|
labor relations and work stoppages; |
|
|
|
|
operating hazards, war, terrorism and cancellation or unavailability of insurance
coverage; |
|
|
|
|
the effect of litigation and contingencies; and |
|
|
|
|
our inability to achieve our plans or carry out our strategy. |
Many of these factors are beyond our ability to control or predict. Any of these factors, or
a combination of these factors, could materially affect our future financial condition or results
of operations and the ultimate accuracy of the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking
statements are not guarantees of our future performance, and our actual results and future
developments may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements.
Management cautions against putting undue reliance on forward-looking statements or projecting any
future results based on such statements or present or prior earnings levels. In addition, each
forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of the particular statement, and we undertake
no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
In February 2007, we entered into a senior secured credit facility, which bears interest at a
variable rate as discussed above in Item 2 under the caption Liquidity and Capital
ResourcesLong-Term DebtSenior Secured Credit Facility. As of September 30, 2007, the interest
rate on borrowings outstanding under our senior secured credit facility was 7.75%. A hypothetical
100-basis point increase in the interest rate on borrowings outstanding under our senior secured
credit facility would increase our annual interest payments by approximately $142,994.
In June 2007, we entered into a six-year, $60.0 million senior secured term loan facility,
which bears interest at a variable rate, as discussed above in Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsLong-Term DebtSenior Secured Term
Loan in Item 2 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. As of September 30, 2007, the
weighted average interest rate on our senior secured term loan was 8.63%. A hypothetical 100-basis
point increase in the interest rate on our senior secured term loan would increase our annual
interest payments by approximately $550,000.
Payments under our contract for the construction of the Superior Achiever are denominated in
Euros. In November 2006, we entered into a hedging transaction with the purpose and effect of
capping the exchange rate, at 1.2975 U.S. dollars to 1 Euro, on approximately $72.1 million of
payments relating to the construction of the Superior Achiever through June 2008 (excluding
equipment purchases). Nevertheless, we may still be subject to the risk of fluctuations in
currency exchange rates with respect to any Euro-denominated payments relating to change orders
under the newbuild construction contract or equipment purchased for the Superior Achiever.
38
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
See Item 4T below.
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Control and Procedures
Our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act)), as of September 30, 2007. Based on that evaluation, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of September 30, 2007, our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective in providing reasonable assurance that
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs
rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months
ended September 30, 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
39
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
In June 2007, we entered into a contract for the charter of the Toisa Puma. The contract term
for the charter is two years, subject to options to extend the charter for up to two additional
six-month periods. The Toisa Puma was delivered to us in late July 2007. In September 2007, we
entered into binding arbitration proceedings related to a dispute over the non-payment of certain
fees under our two-year charter of the Toisa Puma, based on the readiness of the vessel for its
intended use. We are asserting that we are not liable for the payment of fees of approximately
$3.5 million under the charter. We are also seeking reimbursement of $0.7 million that we paid the
vessel owner for the initial two-week period of the charter. Because the ultimate outcome of the
arbitration cannot currently be determined, we have not recorded a provision in our consolidated
financial statements for possible liabilities, which range from zero to approximately $3.5 million.
In addition, the consolidated financial statements do not reflect amounts related to the possible
recovery of the $0.7 million of fees already paid. We may be entitled to cancel the charter at no
further cost to us if the vessel is not returned from drydock before December 8, 2007.
We are routinely involved in litigation, claims and disputes arising in the ordinary course of
our business. Except as discussed above, we do not believe that ultimate liability, if any,
resulting from any such pending litigation will have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition or results of operations.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 18, 2007, by and
among Superior Offshore International, Inc., OFI Acquisition LLC,
Ocean Flow International, L.L.C., and Karl Winter (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form
8-K filed on October 22, 2007).* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Superior
Offshore International, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 333-142394) (the Form S-8)). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Bylaws of Superior Offshore International, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Form S-8). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of August 14, 2007
among Superior Offshore International, Inc., as Borrower, the
lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as
Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2007). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
Third Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of August 24, 2007
among Superior Offshore International, Inc., as Borrower, the
lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as
Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 30, 2007). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of the Principal Executive
Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of the Principal Financial
Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Section 1350 certification of the Principal Executive Officer
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Section 1350 certification of the Principal Financial Officer
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
40
|
|
|
* |
|
Exhibits and schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. The
Company hereby undertakes to furnish supplementally copies of any of the omitted exhibits and
schedules upon request by the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
41
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE
INTERNATIONAL, INC.
|
|
Date: November 19, 2007 |
By: |
/s/ James J. Mermis
|
|
|
|
James J. Mermis |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 19, 2007 |
By: |
/s/ Roger D. Burks
|
|
|
|
Roger D. Burks |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial and Administrative Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 19, 2007 |
By: |
/s/ Randy Putman
|
|
|
|
Randy Putman |
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
42
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 18, 2007, by and
among Superior Offshore International, Inc., OFI Acquisition LLC,
Ocean Flow International, L.L.C., and Karl Winter (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form
8-K filed on October 22, 2007).* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Superior
Offshore International, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 333-142394) (the Form S-8)). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Bylaws of Superior Offshore International, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Form S-8). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of August 14, 2007
among Superior Offshore International, Inc., as Borrower, the
lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as
Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2007). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
Third Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of August 24, 2007
among Superior Offshore International, Inc., as Borrower, the
lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as
Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 30, 2007). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of the Principal Executive
Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of the Principal Financial
Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Section 1350 certification of the Principal Executive Officer
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Section 1350 certification of the Principal Financial Officer
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Exhibits and schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. The
Company hereby undertakes to furnish supplementally copies of any of the omitted exhibits and
schedules upon request by the Securities and Exchange Commission. |