form10q.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012
or
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-14094
Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Michigan |
|
38-2626206 |
(State of Incorporation) |
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
26255 American Drive, Southfield, Michigan 48034
(Address, zip code of principal executive offices)
(248) 358-1100
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer x Non-accelerated filer o Smaller Reporting Company o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso No x
The aggregate number of shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock, $.01 par value, outstanding on August 2, 2012, was 49,776,011.
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
ITEM 1 –
|
|
|
|
|
2-3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8 - 27
|
|
|
|
ITEM 2 –
|
|
28 - 43
|
|
|
|
ITEM 3 –
|
|
44 - 45
|
|
|
|
ITEM 4 –
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
ITEM 1 –
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
ITEM 1A –
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
ITEM 2 –
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
ITEM 3 –
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
ITEM 4 –
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
ITEM 5 –
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
ITEM 6 –
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
PART 1 - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
For the Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
$ |
248,581 |
|
|
$ |
209,676 |
|
Ceded
|
|
|
(37,278 |
) |
|
|
(28,206 |
) |
Net earned premiums
|
|
|
211,303 |
|
|
|
181,470 |
|
Net commissions and fees
|
|
|
8,552 |
|
|
|
7,897 |
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
13,683 |
|
|
|
13,765 |
|
Realized gains (losses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other-than-temporary impairments on securities
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net other-than-temporary impairments on securities recognized in earnings
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net realized gains excluding other-than-temporary impairments on securities
|
|
|
1,567 |
|
|
|
1,094 |
|
Net realized gains
|
|
|
1,567 |
|
|
|
1,094 |
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
235,105 |
|
|
|
204,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
196,976 |
|
|
|
141,356 |
|
Reinsurance recoveries
|
|
|
(31,218 |
) |
|
|
(19,953 |
) |
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
165,758 |
|
|
|
121,403 |
|
Policy acquisition and other underwriting expenses
|
|
|
68,993 |
|
|
|
62,694 |
|
General, selling and administrative expenses
|
|
|
6,327 |
|
|
|
5,631 |
|
General corporate expenses
|
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
(719 |
) |
Amortization expense
|
|
|
1,307 |
|
|
|
1,206 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
2,033 |
|
|
|
2,082 |
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
245,176 |
|
|
|
192,297 |
|
(Loss) income before taxes and equity earnings
|
|
|
(10,071 |
) |
|
|
11,929 |
|
Federal and state income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(1,782 |
) |
|
|
2,323 |
|
Equity earnings of affiliates, net of tax
|
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
Equity (losses) earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries, net of tax
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$ |
(7,732 |
) |
|
$ |
9,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Losses) Earnings Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
50,251,591 |
|
|
|
53,100,479 |
|
Diluted
|
|
|
50,251,591 |
|
|
|
53,248,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid per common share
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
$ |
476,027 |
|
|
$ |
410,362 |
|
Ceded
|
|
|
(71,909 |
) |
|
|
(58,234 |
) |
Net earned premiums
|
|
|
404,118 |
|
|
|
352,128 |
|
Net commissions and fees
|
|
|
17,517 |
|
|
|
16,335 |
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
27,415 |
|
|
|
27,337 |
|
Realized gains (losses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other-than-temporary impairments on securities
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net other-than-temporary impairments on securities recognized in earnings
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
Net realized gains excluding other-than-temporary impairments on securities
|
|
|
2,299 |
|
|
|
1,990 |
|
Net realized gains
|
|
|
2,299 |
|
|
|
1,906 |
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
451,349 |
|
|
|
397,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
358,495 |
|
|
|
270,079 |
|
Reinsurance recoveries
|
|
|
(59,990 |
) |
|
|
(43,414 |
) |
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
298,505 |
|
|
|
226,665 |
|
Policy acquisition and other underwriting expenses
|
|
|
132,106 |
|
|
|
120,851 |
|
General, selling and administrative expenses
|
|
|
12,666 |
|
|
|
11,875 |
|
General corporate expenses
|
|
|
2,131 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
2,723 |
|
|
|
2,438 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,010 |
|
|
|
4,254 |
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
452,141 |
|
|
|
366,719 |
|
(Loss) income before taxes and equity earnings
|
|
|
(792 |
) |
|
|
30,987 |
|
Federal and state income tax expense
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
7,782 |
|
Equity earnings of affiliates, net of tax
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
Equity losses of unconsolidated subsidiaries, net of tax
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
Net income
|
|
$ |
372 |
|
|
$ |
24,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
50,583,368 |
|
|
|
53,175,824 |
|
Diluted
|
|
|
50,583,368 |
|
|
|
53,323,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid per common share
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
For the Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$ |
(7,732 |
) |
|
$ |
9,780 |
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on securities
|
|
|
7,900 |
|
|
|
13,528 |
|
Unrealized gains in affiliates and unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Increase (decrease) on non-credit other-than-temporary impairments on securities
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
(231 |
) |
Net deferred derivative losses - hedging activity
|
|
|
(413 |
) |
|
|
(381 |
) |
Less reclassification adjustment for investment gains included in net income
|
|
|
(1,645 |
) |
|
|
(1,070 |
) |
Other comprehensive gains
|
|
|
5,892 |
|
|
|
11,896 |
|
Comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
$ |
(1,840 |
) |
|
$ |
21,676 |
|
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
372 |
|
|
$ |
24,429 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on securities
|
|
|
7,732 |
|
|
|
11,148 |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) in affiliates and unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Increase on non-credit other-than-temporary impairments on securities
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
Net deferred derivative (losses) gains - hedging activity
|
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
285 |
|
Less reclassification adjustment for investment gains included in net income
|
|
|
(2,356 |
) |
|
|
(1,880 |
) |
Other comprehensive gains
|
|
|
5,720 |
|
|
|
9,637 |
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
6,092 |
|
|
$ |
34,066 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost of $1,352,554 and $1,252,775)
|
|
$ |
1,466,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,358,749 |
|
Equity securities available for sale, at fair value (cost of $23,065 and $25,176)
|
|
|
25,823 |
|
|
|
27,174 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
88,159 |
|
|
|
101,757 |
|
Accrued investment income
|
|
|
14,528 |
|
|
|
13,757 |
|
Premiums and agent balances receivable, net
|
|
|
216,485 |
|
|
|
183,160 |
|
Reinsurance recoverable on:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid losses
|
|
|
12,788 |
|
|
|
9,870 |
|
Unpaid losses
|
|
|
349,361 |
|
|
|
315,884 |
|
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
|
|
|
37,678 |
|
|
|
33,754 |
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
80,554 |
|
|
|
74,467 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
121,041 |
|
|
|
120,792 |
|
Other intangible assets
|
|
|
32,837 |
|
|
|
34,483 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
102,351 |
|
|
|
96,251 |
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
2,547,605 |
|
|
$ |
2,370,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
$ |
1,301,002 |
|
|
$ |
1,194,977 |
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
|
424,760 |
|
|
|
386,750 |
|
Debt
|
|
|
61,000 |
|
|
|
28,375 |
|
Debentures
|
|
|
80,930 |
|
|
|
80,930 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
39,233 |
|
|
|
38,716 |
|
Funds held and reinsurance balances payable
|
|
|
34,264 |
|
|
|
25,903 |
|
Payable to insurance companies
|
|
|
6,059 |
|
|
|
4,321 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net
|
|
|
8,966 |
|
|
|
8,453 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
16,407 |
|
|
|
16,522 |
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,972,621 |
|
|
|
1,784,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 75,000,000 shares; 49,776,011 and 51,050,204 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
520 |
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
272,198 |
|
|
|
279,005 |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
229,459 |
|
|
|
238,539 |
|
Note receivable from officer
|
|
|
(752 |
) |
|
|
(767 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
73,574 |
|
|
|
67,854 |
|
Total shareholders' equity
|
|
|
574,984 |
|
|
|
585,151 |
|
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
|
$ |
2,547,605 |
|
|
$ |
2,370,098 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
Additional Paid-
In Capital
|
|
|
Retained
Earnings
|
|
|
Note
Receivable
from Officer
|
|
|
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income
|
|
|
Total
Shareholders'
Equity
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited, In thousands)
|
|
Balances December 31, 2011 (As previously reported)
|
|
$ |
520 |
|
|
$ |
279,005 |
|
|
$ |
245,816 |
|
|
$ |
(767 |
) |
|
$ |
67,854 |
|
|
$ |
592,428 |
|
Cumulative effect of adjustment resulting from adoption of new accounting guidance
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(7,277 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(7,277 |
) |
As Adjusted Balances December 31, 2011
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
279,005 |
|
|
|
238,539 |
|
|
|
(767 |
) |
|
|
67,854 |
|
|
|
585,151 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
372 |
|
Dividends declared
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(5,057 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(5,057 |
) |
Change in unrealized gain or loss on available for sale securities, net of tax
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,351 |
|
|
|
5,351 |
|
Change in valuation allowance on deferred tax assets
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
Net deferred derivative loss - hedging activity
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
(113 |
) |
Stock award
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
194 |
|
Long term incentive plan; stock award for 2012 plan years
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
106 |
|
Change in investment of affiliates, net of tax
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
Change in investment of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Repurchase of 1,267,300 shares of common stock
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(7,107 |
) |
|
|
(4,395 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(11,517 |
) |
Note receivable from officer
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Balances June 30, 2012
|
|
$ |
505 |
|
|
$ |
272,198 |
|
|
$ |
229,459 |
|
|
$ |
(752 |
) |
|
$ |
73,574 |
|
|
$ |
574,984 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
372 |
|
|
$ |
24,429 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of other intangible assets
|
|
|
2,723 |
|
|
|
2,438 |
|
Amortization of deferred debenture issuance costs
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Depreciation of furniture, equipment, and building
|
|
|
2,821 |
|
|
|
2,697 |
|
Net amortization of discount and premiums on bonds
|
|
|
2,990 |
|
|
|
1,829 |
|
Gain on sale of investments, net
|
|
|
(2,356 |
) |
|
|
(1,880 |
) |
Gain on sale of fixed assets
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
Long-term incentive plan expense (benefit)
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
(973 |
) |
Stock award
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
Equity earnings of affiliates, net of taxes
|
|
|
(1,250 |
) |
|
|
(1,246 |
) |
Equity losses of unconsolidated subsidiaries, net of tax
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Deferred income tax benefit
|
|
|
(2,075 |
) |
|
|
(522 |
) |
Goodwill adjustment
|
|
|
(249 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Write-off of book of business
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and agent balances receivable
|
|
|
(33,325 |
) |
|
|
(25,634 |
) |
Reinsurance recoverable on paid and unpaid losses
|
|
|
(36,395 |
) |
|
|
(11,771 |
) |
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
|
|
|
(3,924 |
) |
|
|
(292 |
) |
Deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
(6,087 |
) |
|
|
(5,115 |
) |
Other assets
|
|
|
(3,561 |
) |
|
|
(285 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
106,025 |
|
|
|
60,160 |
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
|
38,010 |
|
|
|
27,257 |
|
Payable to insurance companies
|
|
|
1,738 |
|
|
|
2,373 |
|
Funds held and reinsurance balances payable
|
|
|
8,361 |
|
|
|
2,825 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(1,233 |
) |
|
|
(14,826 |
) |
Total adjustments
|
|
|
72,668 |
|
|
|
37,442 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
73,040 |
|
|
|
61,871 |
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of debt securities available for sale
|
|
|
(169,329 |
) |
|
|
(133,777 |
) |
Proceeds from sales and maturities of debt securities available for sale
|
|
|
69,247 |
|
|
|
78,352 |
|
Proceeds from sales of equity securities available for sale
|
|
|
2,506 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(958 |
) |
|
|
(3,970 |
) |
Acquisition of rights renewals
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
Other investing activities
|
|
|
(4,367 |
) |
|
|
592 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(102,901 |
) |
|
|
(58,732 |
) |
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from line of credit and FHLBI
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Payments on term loan
|
|
|
(7,375 |
) |
|
|
(6,500 |
) |
Book overdrafts
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
(1,785 |
) |
Dividends paid on common stock
|
|
|
(5,057 |
) |
|
|
(4,262 |
) |
Share repurchases
|
|
|
(11,517 |
) |
|
|
(3,904 |
) |
Other financing activities
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
16,263 |
|
|
|
(16,431 |
) |
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(13,598 |
) |
|
|
(13,292 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
101,757 |
|
|
|
90,414 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$ |
88,159 |
|
|
$ |
77,122 |
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$ |
3,695 |
|
|
$ |
4,070 |
|
Net income taxes paid (1)
|
|
$ |
3,476 |
|
|
$ |
14,678 |
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based employee compensation
|
|
$ |
194 |
|
|
$ |
366 |
|
(1)
|
Tax return refunds were received in first quarter of 2012 and 2011 for $475 and $732, respectively.
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation and Management Representation
The consolidated financial statements include accounts, after elimination of intercompany accounts and transactions, of Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. (the “Company” or “Meadowbrook”), its wholly owned subsidiary Star Insurance Company (“Star”), and Star’s wholly owned subsidiaries, Savers Property and Casualty Insurance Company (“Savers”), Williamsburg National Insurance Company (“Williamsburg”), and Ameritrust Insurance Corporation (“Ameritrust”). The consolidated financial statements also include Meadowbrook, Inc., Crest Financial Corporation, and their respective subsidiaries. In addition, the consolidated financial statements also include ProCentury Corporation (“ProCentury”) and its wholly owned subsidiaries. ProCentury’s wholly owned subsidiaries consist of Century Surety Company (“Century”) and its wholly owned subsidiary ProCentury Insurance Company (“PIC”). In addition, ProCentury Risk Partners Insurance Company, Ltd., is a wholly owned subsidiary of ProCentury. Star, Savers, Williamsburg, Ameritrust, Century, and PIC are collectively referred to as the Insurance Company Subsidiaries.
In the opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments necessary to present a fair statement of the results for the interim period. Preparation of financial statements under generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The results of operations for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year.
These financial statements and the notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements and accompanying notes included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Revenue Recognition
Premiums written, which include direct, assumed and ceded amounts are recognized as earned on a pro rata basis over the life of the policy term. Unearned premiums represent the portion of premiums written that are applicable to the unexpired terms of policies in force. Provisions for unearned premiums on reinsurance assumed from others are made on the basis of ceding reports when received and actuarial estimates.
Assumed premium estimates include business where the Company accepts a portion of the risk from a ceding carrier as well as the mandatory assumed pool business from the National Council on Compensation Insurance (“NCCI”), or residual market business. The majority of the assumed premium is from an established book of workers’ compensation business produced by a ceding company in which the Company has an equity stake.
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Fee income, which includes risk management consulting, loss control, and claims services, is recognized during the period the services are provided. Depending on the terms of the contract, claims processing fees are recognized as revenue over the estimated life of the claims, or the estimated life of the contract. For those contracts that provide services beyond the expiration or termination of the contract, fees are deferred in an amount equal to management’s estimate of the Company’s obligation to continue to provide services in the future.
Commission income, which includes reinsurance placement, is recorded on the later of the effective date or the billing date of the policies on which they were earned. Commission income is reported net of any sub-producer commission expense. Commission adjustments that occur subsequent to the issuance of the policy, because of cancellation typically are recognized when the policy is effectively cancelled. Profit sharing commissions from insurance companies are recognized when determinable, which is when such commissions are received.
Income Taxes
As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company did not have any unrecognized tax benefits and had no accrued interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts
In October 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance to assist in a consistent application of accounting for costs related to acquiring or renewing insurance contracts among industry practice. The new guidance restricts the capitalization of a contract’s acquisition costs to those that are directly related to the successful acquisition of a new or renewing insurance contract. The new guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company adopted this guidance retrospectively on January 1, 2012 and has adjusted its previously issued financial information.
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The effect of adoption of this new guidance on the consolidated balance sheet and shareholders’ equity statements as of December 31, 2011 was as follows:
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
As Previously
Reported
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
As Adjusted
Reported
|
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
$ |
85,663 |
|
|
$ |
(11,196 |
) |
|
$ |
74,467 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
2,381,294 |
|
|
|
(11,196 |
) |
|
|
2,370,098 |
|
Deferred income tax, net
|
|
|
12,372 |
|
|
|
(3,919 |
) |
|
|
8,453 |
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,788,866 |
|
|
|
(3,919 |
) |
|
|
1,784,947 |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
245,816 |
|
|
|
(7,277 |
) |
|
|
238,539 |
|
Total shareholders' equity
|
|
|
592,428 |
|
|
|
(7,277 |
) |
|
|
585,151 |
|
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
|
|
2,381,294 |
|
|
|
(11,196 |
) |
|
|
2,370,098 |
|
The effect of adoption of this new guidance on the consolidated income and comprehensive income statements for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 was as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
As Previously
Reported
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
As Adjusted
Reported
|
|
Policy acquisition and other underwriting expenses
|
|
$ |
62,450 |
|
|
$ |
244 |
|
|
$ |
62,694 |
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
192,053 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
192,297 |
|
Income before taxes and equity earnings
|
|
|
12,173 |
|
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
11,929 |
|
Federal and state income tax expense
|
|
|
2,408 |
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
2,323 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
9,939 |
|
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
9,780 |
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
21,835 |
|
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
21,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
As Previously
Reported
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
As Adjusted
Reported
|
|
Policy acquisition and other underwriting expenses
|
|
$ |
119,888 |
|
|
$ |
963 |
|
|
$ |
120,851 |
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
365,756 |
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
366,719 |
|
Income before taxes and equity earnings
|
|
|
31,950 |
|
|
|
(963 |
) |
|
|
30,987 |
|
Federal and state income tax expense
|
|
|
8,119 |
|
|
|
(337 |
) |
|
|
7,782 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
25,055 |
|
|
|
(626 |
) |
|
|
24,429 |
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
34,692 |
|
|
|
(626 |
) |
|
|
34,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The effect of adoption of this new guidance on the consolidated cash flows statement for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was as follows:
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
As Previously
Reported
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
As adjusted
Reported
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
25,055 |
|
|
$ |
(626 |
) |
|
$ |
24,429 |
|
Deferred income tax expense
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
(337 |
) |
|
|
(552 |
) |
Deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
(6,078 |
) |
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
(5,115 |
) |
Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs
In May 2011, the FASB issued guidance to achieve common requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements in accordance with U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs). The guidance explains how to measure fair value and does not require additional fair value measurements, nor is it intended to establish valuation standards or affect valuation practices outside of financial reporting. The guidance is to be applied prospectively for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2012. The adoption did not have a material impact on its financial condition and results of operations.
Presentation of Comprehensive Income
In June 2011, the FASB issued guidance to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income by eliminating the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The guidance requires that all nonowner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The guidance is to be applied retrospectively and is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2012. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on its financial condition and results of operations.
Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment
In July 2012, the FASB issued guidance on how to test indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment through use of a qualitative approach. The guidance permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not (defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test in accordance with Subtopic 350-30, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—General Intangibles Other than Goodwill. The guidance is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted. The Company is still evaluating the impact of adoption on its financial condition and results of operations.
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 2 – Investments
The cost or amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, losses, non-credit other-than-temporary impairments (“OTTI”) and estimated fair value of investments in securities classified as available for sale at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
June 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
Cost or
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Non-Credit
OTTI
|
|
Debt Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and agencies
|
|
$ |
21,077 |
|
|
$ |
1,772 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
22,849 |
|
Obligations of states and political subs
|
|
|
598,436 |
|
|
|
50,344 |
|
|
|
(371 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
648,409 |
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
547,966 |
|
|
|
47,728 |
|
|
|
(525 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
595,169 |
|
Redeemable preferred stock
|
|
|
1,743 |
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,203 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
134,203 |
|
|
|
10,294 |
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
144,385 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
37,066 |
|
|
|
2,633 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
39,699 |
|
Other asset-backed securities
|
|
|
12,063 |
|
|
|
1,596 |
|
|
|
(373 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
13,286 |
|
Total debt securities available for sale
|
|
|
1,352,554 |
|
|
|
114,827 |
|
|
|
(1,381 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,466,000 |
|
Equity Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perpetual preferred stock
|
|
|
8,302 |
|
|
|
2,029 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
10,321 |
|
Common stock
|
|
|
14,763 |
|
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
(232 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
15,502 |
|
Total equity securities available for sale
|
|
|
23,065 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
25,823 |
|
Total securities available for sale
|
|
$ |
1,375,619 |
|
|
$ |
117,827 |
|
|
$ |
(1,623 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,491,823 |
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
Cost or
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Non-Credit
OTTI
|
|
Debt Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and agencies
|
|
$ |
20,510 |
|
|
$ |
1,856 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
22,366 |
|
Obligations of states and political subs
|
|
|
556,265 |
|
|
|
49,742 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
606,002 |
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
469,770 |
|
|
|
40,591 |
|
|
|
(1,292 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
509,069 |
|
Redeemable preferred stock
|
|
|
1,924 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,254 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
152,719 |
|
|
|
11,534 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
163,985 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
37,191 |
|
|
|
2,337 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
39,528 |
|
Other asset-backed securities
|
|
|
14,396 |
|
|
|
1,695 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(513 |
) |
|
|
15,545 |
|
Total debt securities available for sale
|
|
|
1,252,775 |
|
|
|
108,085 |
|
|
|
(1,370 |
) |
|
|
(741 |
) |
|
|
1,358,749 |
|
Equity Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perpetual preferred stock
|
|
|
10,413 |
|
|
|
1,792 |
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
12,147 |
|
Common stock
|
|
|
14,763 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
(333 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
15,027 |
|
Total equity securities available for sale
|
|
|
25,176 |
|
|
|
2,389 |
|
|
|
(391 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
27,174 |
|
Total securities available for sale
|
|
$ |
1,277,951 |
|
|
$ |
110,474 |
|
|
$ |
(1,761 |
) |
|
$ |
(741 |
) |
|
$ |
1,385,923 |
|
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Gross unrealized gains, losses, and non-credit OTTI on available for sale securities as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
June 30, 2012
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
Unrealized gains
|
|
$ |
117,827 |
|
|
$ |
110,474 |
|
Unrealized losses
|
|
|
(1,623 |
) |
|
|
(1,761 |
) |
Non-credit OTTI
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(741 |
) |
Net unrealized gains
|
|
|
116,204 |
|
|
|
107,972 |
|
Deferred federal income tax expense
|
|
|
(40,671 |
) |
|
|
(37,790 |
) |
Net unrealized gains on investments, net of deferred federal income taxes
|
|
$ |
75,533 |
|
|
$ |
70,182 |
|
Net realized gains (losses including OTTI) on securities, for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
For the Three Months
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
For the Six Months
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Realized gains (losses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized gains
|
|
$ |
1,328 |
|
|
$ |
942 |
|
|
$ |
1,994 |
|
|
$ |
1,866 |
|
Gross realized losses
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(141 |
) |
Total debt securities
|
|
|
1,307 |
|
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
1,961 |
|
|
|
1,725 |
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized gains
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
Gross realized losses
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total equity securities
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
Net realized gains
|
|
$ |
1,645 |
|
|
$ |
1,069 |
|
|
$ |
2,356 |
|
|
$ |
1,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTTI included in realized losses on securities above
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(84 |
) |
Proceeds from the sales of fixed maturity securities available for sale were $9.6 million and $11.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Proceeds from the sales of fixed maturity securities available for sale were $20.4 million and $27.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
At June 30, 2012, the amortized cost and estimated fair value of available for sale debt securities by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities, because certain borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties (in thousands):
|
|
Available for Sale
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$ |
31,634 |
|
|
$ |
32,007 |
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
329,713 |
|
|
|
346,905 |
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
634,506 |
|
|
|
705,493 |
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
173,369 |
|
|
|
184,225 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities, collateralized obligations and asset-backed securities
|
|
|
183,332 |
|
|
|
197,370 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,352,554 |
|
|
$ |
1,466,000 |
|
Net investment income for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
For the Three Months
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
For the Six Months
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Net Investment Income Earned From:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities
|
|
$ |
13,507 |
|
|
$ |
13,436 |
|
|
$ |
26,800 |
|
|
$ |
26,628 |
|
Equity Securities
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
979 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
Total gross investment income
|
|
|
14,020 |
|
|
|
14,083 |
|
|
|
28,093 |
|
|
|
27,997 |
|
Less investment expenses
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
678 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
Net investment income
|
|
$ |
13,683 |
|
|
$ |
13,765 |
|
|
$ |
27,415 |
|
|
$ |
27,337 |
|
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments of Securities and Unrealized Losses on Investments
Available for sale securities are reviewed for declines in fair value that are determined to be other-than-temporary. For a debt security, if the Company intends to sell a security and it is more likely than not the Company will be required to sell a debt security before recovery of its amortized cost basis and the fair value of the debt security is below amortized cost, the Company concludes that an OTTI has occurred and the amortized cost is written down to current fair value, with a corresponding charge to realized loss in the Consolidated Statements of Income. If the Company does not intend to sell a debt security and it is not more likely than not the Company will be required to sell a debt security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, but the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost of the debt security (referred to as the credit loss), the Company concludes that an OTTI has occurred. In this instance, accounting guidance requires the bifurcation of the total OTTI into the amount related to the credit loss, which is recognized in earnings, and the non-credit OTTI, which is recorded in Other Comprehensive Income as an unrealized non-credit OTTI in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
When assessing the Company’s intent to sell a debt security, if it is more likely than not the Company will be required to sell a debt security before recovery of its cost basis, facts and circumstances such as, but not limited to, decisions to reposition the security portfolio, sale of securities to meet cash flow needs and sales of securities to capitalize on favorable pricing, are evaluated. In order to determine the amount of the credit loss for a debt security, the Company calculates the recovery value by performing a discounted cash flow analysis based on the current cash flows and future cash flows expected to be recovered. The discount rate is the effective interest rate implicit in the underlying debt security upon issuance. The effective interest rate is the original yield or the coupon if the debt security was previously impaired. If an OTTI exists and there is not sufficient cash flows or other information to determine a recovery value of the security, the Company concludes that the entire OTTI is credit-related and the amortized cost for the security is written down to current fair value with a corresponding charge to realized loss in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
To determine the recovery period of a debt security, the Company considers the facts and circumstances surrounding the underlying issuer including, but not limited to the following:
|
·
|
Historical and implied volatility of the security;
|
|
·
|
Length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost;
|
|
·
|
Conditions specifically related to the security such as default rates, loss severities, loan to value ratios, current levels of subordination, third party guarantees, and vintage;
|
|
·
|
Specific conditions in an industry or geographic area;
|
|
·
|
Any changes to the rating of the security by a rating agency;
|
|
·
|
Failure, if any, of the issuer of the security to make scheduled payments; and
|
|
·
|
Recoveries or additional declines in fair value subsequent to the balance sheet date.
|
In periods subsequent to the recognition of an OTTI, the security is accounted for as if it had been purchased on the measurement date of the OTTI. Therefore, for a fixed maturity security, the discount or reduced premium is reflected in net investment income over the contractual term of the investment in a manner that produces a constant effective yield.
For an equity security, if the Company does not have the ability and intent to hold the security for a sufficient period of time to allow for a recovery in value, the Company concludes that an OTTI has occurred, and the cost of the equity security is written down to the current fair value, with a corresponding charge to realized loss within the Consolidated Statements of Income. When assessing the Company’s ability and intent to hold the equity security to recovery, the Company considers, among other things, the severity and duration of the decline in fair value of the equity security, the cause of the decline and a fundamental analysis of the liquidity, business prospects and overall financial condition of the issuer.
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
After the Company’s review of its investment portfolio in relation to this policy, the Company did not record a credit or a non-credit related OTTI loss for the three months or six months ended June 30, 2012. For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recorded no credit OTTI loss and a credit OTTI loss of $84,000, respectively. For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011, no non-credit related OTTI losses were recognized by the Company in other comprehensive income.
The fair value and amount of unrealized losses segregated by the time period the investment has been in an unrealized loss position were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
June 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months
|
|
|
Greater than 12 months
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Number of
Issues
|
|
|
Fair Value of
Investments
with
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses and
Non-Credit
OTTI
|
|
|
Number
of
Issues
|
|
|
Fair Value of
Investments
with Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses and
Non-Credit
OTTI
|
|
|
Number
of
Issues
|
|
|
Fair Value of
Investments
with Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses and
Non-Credit
OTTI
|
|
Debt Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and agencies
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
151 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
151 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Obligations of states and political subs
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
39,769 |
|
|
|
(371 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
39,769 |
|
|
|
(371 |
) |
Corporate securities
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
24,653 |
|
|
|
(481 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3,005 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
27,658 |
|
|
|
(525 |
) |
Redeemable preferred stock
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3,538 |
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3,631 |
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other asset-backed securities
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,120 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1,406 |
|
|
|
(366 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
2,526 |
|
|
|
(373 |
) |
Total debt securities
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
65,786 |
|
|
|
(859 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
7,949 |
|
|
|
(522 |
) |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
73,735 |
|
|
|
(1,381 |
) |
Equity Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perpetual preferred stock
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
Common stock
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4,932 |
|
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5,211 |
|
|
|
(232 |
) |
Total equity securities
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4,932 |
|
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5,215 |
|
|
|
(242 |
) |
Total securities
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
$ |
66,069 |
|
|
$ |
(880 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
$ |
12,881 |
|
|
$ |
(743 |
) |
|
|
46 |
|
|
$ |
78,950 |
|
|
$ |
(1,623 |
) |
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months
|
|
|
Greater than 12 months
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Number
of Issues
|
|
|
Fair Value of
Investments
with
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses and
Non-Credit
OTTI
|
|
|
Number
of
Issues
|
|
|
Fair Value of
Investments
with Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses and
Non-Credit
OTTI
|
|
|
Number
of
Issues
|
|
|
Fair Value of
Investments
with Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses and
Non-Credit
OTTI
|
|
Debt Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and agencies
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Obligations of states and political subs
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Corporate securities
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
27,154 |
|
|
|
(1,292 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
27,154 |
|
|
|
(1,292 |
) |
Redeemable preferred stock
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3,561 |
|
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
3,744 |
|
|
|
(268 |
) |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other asset-backed securities
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1,831 |
|
|
|
(519 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
2,994 |
|
|
|
(546 |
) |
Total debt securities
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
29,385 |
|
|
|
(1,359 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
6,315 |
|
|
|
(752 |
) |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
35,700 |
|
|
|
(2,111 |
) |
Equity Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perpetual preferred stock
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
Common stock
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4,851 |
|
|
|
(321 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5,130 |
|
|
|
(333 |
) |
Total equity securities
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,358 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4,851 |
|
|
|
(321 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
6,209 |
|
|
|
(391 |
) |
Total securities
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
$ |
30,743 |
|
|
$ |
(1,429 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
$ |
11,166 |
|
|
$ |
(1,073 |
) |
|
|
43 |
|
|
$ |
41,909 |
|
|
$ |
(2,502 |
) |
Changes in the amount of credit loss on fixed maturities for which a portion of an OTTI related to other factors was recognized in other comprehensive income were as follows (in thousands):
Balance as of December 31, 2011
|
|
$ |
(789 |
) |
Additional credit impairments on:
|
|
|
|
|
Previously impaired securities
|
|
|
- |
|
Securities for which an impairment was not previously recognized
|
|
|
- |
|
Reductions
|
|
|
- |
|
Balance as of June 30, 2012
|
|
$ |
(789 |
) |
NOTE 3 – Fair Value Measurements
According to accounting guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures, fair value is the price that would be received in the sale of an asset or would be paid in the transfer of a liability (i.e., the “exit price”) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The guidance establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (“observable inputs”) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (“unobservable inputs”).
The estimated fair values of the Company’s fixed investment portfolio are based on prices provided by a third party pricing service and a third party investment manager. The prices provided by these services are based on quoted market prices, when available, non-binding broker quotes, or matrix pricing. The third party pricing service and the third party investment manager provide a single price or quote per security and the Company has not historically adjusted security prices. The Company obtains an understanding of the methods, models and inputs used by the third party pricing service and the third party investment manager, and has controls in place to validate that amounts provided represent fair values. The Company’s control process includes, but is not limited to, initial and ongoing evaluation of the methodologies used, a review of specific securities and an assessment for proper classification within the fair value hierarchy. The hierarchy level assigned to each security in the Company’s available for sale portfolio is based upon its assessment of the transparency and reliability of the inputs used in the valuation as of the measurement date. The three hierarchy levels are defined as follows:
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Level 1 – Valuations that are based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. The fair value of exchange-traded preferred and common equities, and mutual funds included in the Level 1 category were based on quoted prices that are readily and regularly available in an active market. The fair value measurements that were based on Level 1 inputs comprise 1.8% of the fair value of the total investment portfolio.
Level 2 – Valuations that are based on observable inputs (other than Level 1 prices) such as quoted prices for similar assets at the measurement date; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly. The fair value of securities included in the Level 2 category were based on the market values obtained from a third party pricing service that were evaluated using pricing models that vary by asset class and incorporate available trade, bid and other observable market information. The third party pricing service monitors market indicators, as well as industry and economic events. The Level 2 category includes corporate bonds, government and agency bonds, asset-backed, residential mortgage-backed and commercial mortgage-backed securities and municipal bonds. The fair value measurements that were based on Level 2 inputs comprise 97.9% of the fair value of the total investment portfolio.
Level 3 – Valuations that are derived from techniques in which one or more of the significant inputs are unobservable and/or involve management judgment and/or are based on non-binding broker quotes. The fair value measurements that were based on Level 3 inputs comprise 0.3% of the fair value of the total investment portfolio.
For corporate, government and municipal bonds, the third party pricing service utilizes a pricing model with standard inputs that include benchmark yields, reported trades, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, market bids/offers, and other reference data observable in the marketplace. The model uses the option adjusted spread methodology and is a multi-dimensional relational model. All bonds valued under these techniques are classified as Level 2.
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For asset-backed, residential mortgage-backed and commercial mortgage-backed securities, the third party pricing service valuation methodology includes consideration of interest rate movements, new issue data, monthly remittance reports and other pertinent data that is observable in the marketplace. This information is used to determine the cash flows for each tranche and identifies the inputs to be used, such as benchmark yields, prepayment assumptions and collateral performance. All asset-backed, residential mortgage-backed and commercial mortgage-backed securities valued under these methods are classified as Level 2.
Also included in Level 2 valuation are interest rate swap agreements the Company utilizes to hedge the floating interest rate on its debt, thereby changing the variable rate exposure to a fixed rate exposure for interest on these obligations. The estimated fair value of the interest rate swaps is obtained from the third party financial institution counterparties and measured using discounted cash flow analysis that incorporates significant observable inputs, including the LIBOR forward curve, derivative counterparty spreads, and measurements of volatility.
The Level 3 securities consist of 13 securities totaling $4.8 million or 0.3% of the fair value of the total investment portfolio. These primarily represent asset-backed securities and corporate debt securities that have a principal protection feature supported by a U.S. Treasury strip. To fair value these securities, the third party investment manager uses a combination of methods. Non-binding broker/dealer quotes are used on 1 holding. Benchmarking techniques based upon industry sector, rating and other factors are used on the other12 holdings.
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, classified by the valuation hierarchy as of June 30, 2012 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2012
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Debt Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and agencies
|
|
$ |
22,849 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
22,849 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Obligations of states and political subs
|
|
|
648,409 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
648,409 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
595,169 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
594,045 |
|
|
|
1,124 |
|
Redeemable preferred stock
|
|
|
2,203 |
|
|
|
2,203 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
144,385 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
144,385 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
39,699 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
39,699 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other asset-backed securities
|
|
|
13,286 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
9,657 |
|
|
|
3,629 |
|
Total debt securities available for sale
|
|
|
1,466,000 |
|
|
|
2,203 |
|
|
|
1,459,044 |
|
|
|
4,753 |
|
Equity Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perpetual preferred stock
|
|
|
10,321 |
|
|
|
9,582 |
|
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Common stock
|
|
|
15,502 |
|
|
|
15,502 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total equity securities available for sale
|
|
|
25,823 |
|
|
|
25,084 |
|
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total securities available for sale
|
|
$ |
1,491,823 |
|
|
$ |
27,287 |
|
|
$ |
1,459,783 |
|
|
$ |
4,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives - interest rate swaps
|
|
$ |
(5,217 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(5,217 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
The following table presents changes in Level 3 available for sale investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2012 (in thousands):
|
|
Fair Value
Measurement
Using Significant
Unobservable
Inputs - Level 3
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2011
|
|
$ |
4,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings
|
|
|
33 |
|
Included in other comprehensive income
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
- |
|
Issuances
|
|
|
- |
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers in and out of Level 3
|
|
|
- |
|
Balance as of June 30, 2012
|
|
$ |
4,753 |
|
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
There were no credit losses for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized losses on Level 3 assets still held at the reporting date.
The Company’s policy on recognizing transfers between hierarchy levels is applied at the end of a reporting period. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, there were no transfers between levels. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, there was one asset-backed security of negligible value transferred into Level 3 from Level 2 as fair value was no longer determined using market inputs that could be directly or indirectly observable.
NOTE 4 – Debt
Credit Facilities
On July 31, 2008, the Company executed $100 million in senior credit facilities (the “Credit Facilities”). The Credit Facilities included a $65.0 million term loan facility, which was fully funded upon the closing of its merger with ProCentury (the “Merger”) and a $35.0 million revolving credit facility, which was partially funded upon closing of the Merger.
The revolving credit facility includes a letter of credit facility with a sublimit. The total amount of credit available under the revolving credit facility is $35.0 million, which may include up to $15 million in letters of credit. As of June 30, 2012, the outstanding balance on its term loan facility was $16.5 million. The Company had a $14.5 million outstanding balance on its revolving credit facility as of June 30, 2012, and $0.5 million in letters of credit had been issued as of June 30, 2012. The undrawn portion of the revolving credit facility is available to finance working capital and for general corporate purposes, including but not limited to, surplus contributions to its Insurance Company Subsidiaries to support premium growth or strategic acquisitions. At December 31, 2011, the Company had an outstanding balance of $23.9 million on its term loan and a $4.5 million outstanding balance on its revolving credit facility. There was $0.5 million in letters of credit that had been issued as of December 31, 2011.
The principal amount outstanding under the Credit Facilities provides for interest at LIBOR, plus the applicable margin, or at the Company’s option, the base rate. The base rate is defined as the higher of the lending bank’s prime rate or the Federal Funds rate, plus 0.50%, plus the applicable margin. The applicable margin is determined by the consolidated indebtedness to consolidated total capital ratio. In addition, the Credit Facilities provide for an unused facility fee ranging between twenty basis points and forty basis points, based on our consolidated leverage ratio as defined by the Credit Facilities. At June 30, 2012, the interest rate on the Company’s term loan was 5.70%, which consisted of a fixed rate of 3.95%, as described in Note 5 ~ Derivative Instruments, plus an applicable margin of 1.75%.
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The financial covenants applicable to the Credit Facilities consist of: (1) minimum consolidated net worth starting at eighty percent of pro forma consolidated net worth after giving effect to the Merger, with quarterly increases thereafter, (2) minimum Risk Based Capital Ratio for Star and Century of 1.75 to 1.00, (3) maximum permitted consolidated leverage ratio of 0.35 to 1.00, (4) minimum consolidated debt service coverage ratio of 1.25 to 1.00, and (5) minimum A.M. Best rating of “B++.” As of June 30, 2012, the Company was in compliance with these debt covenants.
During 2011, several of the Company's insurance subsidiaries (Star, Williamsburg, and Ameritrust) became members of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis ("FHLBI"). As a member of the FHLBI, these subsidiaries have the ability to borrow on a collateralized basis at relatively low borrowing rates, providing a source of liquidity. As of June 30, 2012, the Company had borrowed $30.0 million from the FHLBI after pledging as collateral residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) having a carrying value of $31.0 million, and making a FHLBI common stock investment of approximately $1.6 million. The Company has the ability to increase its borrowing capacity through purchasing additional investments and pledging additional securities. The Company retains all the rights regarding the collateralized RMBS.
Debentures
The following table summarizes the principal amounts and certain other information associated with the Company’s debentures (in thousands):
Year of
Issuance
|
Description
|
Year
Callable
|
Year Due
|
Interest Rate Terms
|
|
Interest Rate
at June 30,
2012 (1)
|
|
|
Principal
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
2008
|
2033
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 4.05%
|
|
|
4.51 |
% |
|
$ |
10,310 |
|
2004
|
Senior debentures
|
2009
|
2034
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 4.00%
|
|
|
4.47 |
% |
|
|
13,000 |
|
2004
|
Senior debentures
|
2009
|
2034
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 4.20%
|
|
|
4.67 |
% |
|
|
12,000 |
|
2005
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
2010
|
2035
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 3.58%
|
|
|
4.05 |
% |
|
|
20,620 |
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures (2)
|
2007
|
2032
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 4.00%
|
|
|
4.47 |
% |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures (2)
|
2008
|
2033
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 4.10%
|
|
|
4.57 |
% |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$ |
80,930 |
|
(1) The underlying three-month LIBOR rate varies as a result of the interest rate reset dates used in determining the three-month LIBOR rate, which varies for each long-term debt item each quarter.
(2) Represents the junior subordinated debentures acquired in conjunction with the Merger on July 31, 2008.
Excluding the junior subordinated debentures acquired in conjunction with the Merger, the Company received a total of $53.3 million in net proceeds from the issuances of the above long-term debt, of which $26.2 million was contributed to the surplus of its Insurance Company Subsidiaries and the remaining balance was used for general corporate purposes. Associated with the issuance of the above long-term debt, the Company incurred approximately $1.7 million in issuance costs for commissions paid to the placement agents in the transactions.
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The issuance costs associated with these debentures have been capitalized and are included in other assets on the balance sheet. As of June 30, 2007, these issuance costs were being amortized over a seven year period as a component of interest expense. The seven year amortization period represented management’s best estimate of the estimated useful life of the bonds related to both the senior debentures and junior subordinated debentures. Beginning July 1, 2007, the Company reevaluated its best estimate and determined a five year amortization period to be a more accurate representation of the estimated useful life. Therefore, this change in amortization period from seven years to five years has been applied prospectively beginning July 1, 2007.
The junior subordinated debentures issued in 2003 and 2005 were issued in conjunction with the issuance of $10.0 million and $20.0 million in mandatory redeemable trust preferred securities to a trust formed by an institutional investor from the Company’s unconsolidated subsidiary trusts, Meadowbrook Capital Trust I and Meadowbrook Capital Trust II, respectively.
The junior subordinated debentures acquired in the Merger were issued in conjunction with the issuance of $15.0 million and $10.0 million in floating rate trust preferred securities to a trust formed from the Company’s unconsolidated trust, ProFinance Statutory Trust I and ProFinance Statutory Trust II. The Company also acquired the remaining unamortized portion of the capitalized issuance costs associated with these debentures. The remaining unamortized portion of the issuance costs acquired was $625,000. These issuance costs are included in other assets on the balance sheet. The remaining balance is being amortized over a five year period beginning August 1, 2008, as a component of interest expense.
The junior subordinated debentures are unsecured obligations of the Company and are junior in the right of payment to all senior indebtedness of the Company. The Company has guaranteed that the payments made to the four trusts mentioned above will be distributed to the holders of the respective trust preferred securities.
The Company estimates that the fair value of the above mentioned junior subordinated debentures and senior debentures issued approximated the gross proceeds of cash received at the time of issuance.
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 5 – Derivative Instruments
The Company has entered into interest rate swap transactions to mitigate its interest rate risk on its existing debt obligations. These interest rate swap transactions have been designated as cash flow hedges and are deemed highly effective hedges. These interest rate swap transactions are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet and the effective portion of the changes in fair value are accounted for within other comprehensive income. The interest differential to be paid or received is accrued and recognized as an adjustment to interest expense.
The following table summarizes the rates and amounts associated with the Company’s interest rate swaps (in thousands):
Effective Date
|
Expiration
Date
|
Debt Instrument
|
Counterparty Interest Rate Terms
|
|
Fixed Rate
|
|
|
Fixed Amount at
June 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/23/2008
|
6/30/2013
|
Junior subordinated debentures (1)
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 4.05%
|
|
|
8.020 |
% |
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
4/29/2008
|
4/29/2013
|
Senior debentures (1)
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 4.00%
|
|
|
7.940 |
% |
|
|
13,000 |
|
7/31/2008
|
7/31/2013
|
Term loan (2)
|
Three-month LIBOR
|
|
|
3.950 |
% |
|
|
16,500 |
|
8/15/2008
|
8/15/2013
|
Junior subordinated debentures (1)(3)
|
Three-month LIBOR
|
|
|
3.780 |
% |
|
|
10,000 |
|
9/4/2008
|
9/4/2013
|
Junior subordinated debentures (1)(3)
|
Three-month LIBOR
|
|
|
3.790 |
% |
|
|
15,000 |
|
9/8/2010
|
5/24/2016
|
Senior debentures
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 4.20%
|
|
|
6.248 |
% |
|
|
5,000 |
|
9/16/2010
|
9/15/2015
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 3.58%
|
|
|
6.160 |
% |
|
|
10,000 |
|
9/16/2010
|
9/15/2015
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 3.58%
|
|
|
6.190 |
% |
|
|
10,000 |
|
5/24/2011
|
5/24/2016
|
Senior debentures
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 4.20%
|
|
|
6.472 |
% |
|
|
7,000 |
|
(1) During the quarter ended June 30, 2012, the Company entered into four forward starting interest rate swaps. The swaps will replace the identified interest rate swaps, upon their expiration in 2013. The fixed rates on the forward starting interest rate swaps are approximately 150 basis points less than the fixed rates on the current swaps in place. Additionally, the forward starting interest rate swaps will expire ten years from the effective date.
(2) The Company is required to make fixed rate interest payments on the current balance of the term loan, amortizing in accordance with the term loan amortization schedule. The Company fixed only the variable interest portion of the loan. The actual interest payments associated with the term loan also include an additional rate of 1.75% in accordance with the Credit Facilities.
(3) The Company fixed only the variable interest portion of the debt. The actual interest payments associated with the debentures also include an additional rate of 4.10% and 4.00% on the $10.0 million and $15.0 million debentures, respectively.
In relation to the above interest rate swaps, the net interest expense incurred for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, was approximately $0.7 million and $0.9 million, respectively. The net interest expense incurred for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, was approximately $1.5 million and $1.9 million, respectively.
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the total fair value of the interest rate swaps was an unrealized loss of $5.2 million and $5.0 million, respectively. At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, accumulated other comprehensive income included accumulated loss on the cash flow hedge, net of taxes, of approximately $3.4 million and $3.3 million, respectively.
In March 2012, the Company replaced its existing $5.6 million convertible note and $664,000 demand note receivables with an unaffiliated insurance agency into new debt instruments with a related limited liability company. The new instruments were effective January 1, 2012 and consist of a $2 million convertible note and a $4.2 million term loan. The interest rate on the convertible note is 3% and is due on January 1, 2022. This note is convertible at the option of the Company based upon a pre-determined formula. The interest rate on the term loan is 5.5% and is due on April 30, 2016. As security for the note and term loan, the borrower granted the Company a first lien on all of its accounts receivable, cash, general intangibles, and other assets. As additional collateral for the note and term loan, the Company obtained guaranties of payment and performance from certain affiliated companies of the borrower, as well as related individuals, which guaranties are secured by additional collateral.
NOTE 6 – Restricted and Non-Restricted Stock Awards
On February 23, 2011 and 2010, the Company issued 28,500 and 202,500 restricted stock awards, respectively, to executives of the Company, out of its 2002 Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”). The restricted stock awards vest over a four year period, with the first twenty percent vesting immediately on the date issued (i.e., February 23) and the remaining eighty percent vesting annually on a straight line basis over the requisite four year service period. The unvested restricted stock awards are subject to forfeiture in the event the employee is terminated for “Good Cause” or voluntarily resigns their employment without “Good Reason” as provided for in the employees’ respective employment agreements. The Company recorded approximately $82,000 and $86,000 of compensation expense related to the restricted stock awards for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Company recorded approximately $128,000 and $218,000 of compensation expense related to the restricted stock awards for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
On February 23, 2012 and 2011, the Company issued 1,500 non-restricted stock awards to each member of the Board of Directors pursuant to the Plan, which vested immediately. The Company recorded zero non-restricted stock awards compensation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. The Company recorded approximately $149,000 and $150,000 of compensation expense related to the non-restricted stock awards for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
NOTE 7 – Shareholders’ Equity
At June 30, 2012, shareholders’ equity was $575.0 million, or a book value of $11.55 per common share, compared to $585.2 million, or a book value of $11.46 per common share, at December 31, 2011.
On October 28, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a Share Repurchase Plan authorizing management to purchase up to 5.0 million shares of the Company’s common stock in market transactions for a period not to exceed twenty-four months. For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company purchased and retired approximately 0.7 million and 1.3 million shares of common stock for a total cost of approximately $6.5 million and $11.5 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company purchased and retired approximately 2.2 million shares of common stock for a total cost of approximately $20.4 million.
For the period ended June 30, 2012, the Company paid dividends to its common shareholders of $5.1 million. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company paid dividends to its common shareholders of $8.9 million. On July 27, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per common share. The dividend is payable on August 27, 2012, to shareholders of record as of August 10, 2012.
When evaluating the declaration of a dividend, the Company’s Board of Directors considers a variety of factors, including but not limited to, cash flow, liquidity needs, results of operations, industry conditions, and our overall financial condition. As a holding company, the ability to pay cash dividends is partially dependent on dividends and other permitted payments from its Insurance Company Subsidiaries.
NOTE 8 – Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share are based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year, while diluted earnings per share includes the weighted average number of common shares and potential dilution from shares issuable pursuant to stock awards using the treasury stock method.
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The following table is a reconciliation of the (loss) income and share data used in the basic and diluted earnings per share computations for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
For the Three Months
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
For the Six Months
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$ |
(7,732 |
) |
|
$ |
9,780 |
|
|
$ |
372 |
|
|
$ |
24,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
50,251,591 |
|
|
|
53,100,479 |
|
|
|
50,583,368 |
|
|
|
53,175,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
50,251,591 |
|
|
|
53,100,479 |
|
|
|
50,583,368 |
|
|
|
53,175,824 |
|
Dilutive effect of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share awards under long term incentive plan
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
148,094 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
147,978 |
|
Total
|
|
|
50,251,591 |
|
|
|
53,248,573 |
|
|
|
50,583,368 |
|
|
|
53,323,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
NOTE 9 – Commitments and Contingencies
The Company, and its subsidiaries, are subject at times to various claims, lawsuits and proceedings relating principally to alleged errors or omissions in the placement of insurance, claims administration, consulting services and other business transactions arising in the ordinary course of business. Where appropriate, the Company vigorously defends such claims, lawsuits and proceedings. Some of these claims, lawsuits and proceedings seek damages, including consequential, exemplary or punitive damages, in amounts that could, if awarded, be significant. Most of the claims, lawsuits and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business are covered by the policy at issue, errors and omissions insurance or other appropriate insurance. In terms of deductibles associated with such insurance, the Company has established provisions against these items, which are believed to be adequate in light of current information and legal advice. In accordance with accounting guidance, if it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred as of the date of the financial statements and the amount of loss is estimable; an accrual for the costs to resolve these claims is recorded by the Company in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Period expenses related to the defense of such claims are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. Management, with the assistance of outside counsel, adjusts such provisions according to new developments or changes in the strategy in dealing with such matters. On the basis of current information, the Company does not expect the outcome of the claims, lawsuits and proceedings to which the Company is subject to, either individually, or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition. However, it is possible that future results of operations or cash flows for any particular quarter or annual period could be materially affected by an unfavorable resolution of any such matters.
For the Periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011
Forward-Looking Statements
This quarterly report may provide information including certain statements which constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These include statements regarding the intent, belief, or current expectations of management, including, but not limited to, those statements that use the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” or similar expressions. You are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve a number of risks and uncertainties, and results could differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements. Among the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements are: the frequency and severity of claims; uncertainties inherent in reserve estimates; catastrophic events; a change in the demand for, pricing of, availability or collectability of reinsurance; increased rate pressure on premiums and on underwriting criteria; ability to obtain rate increases in current market conditions; investment rate of return and losses (whether realized or unrealized) in our investment portfolio; changes in and adherence to insurance or other regulation; actions taken by regulators, rating agencies or lenders; attainment of certain processing efficiencies; changing rates of inflation; general economic conditions and other risks identified in our reports and registration statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. For additional information with respect to certain of these and other factors, refer to the “Risk Factors” section contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 and subsequent filings. We are not under any obligation to (and expressly disclaim any obligation to) update or alter our forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Business Overview
We are a publicly traded specialty niche, focused commercial insurance underwriter and insurance administration services company. We market and underwrite specialty property and casualty insurance programs and products on both an admitted and non-admitted basis through a broad and diverse network of independent retail agents, wholesalers, program administrators and general agents, who value service, specialized knowledge, and focused expertise. Program business refers to an aggregation of individually underwritten risks that have some unique characteristic and are distributed through a select group of agents. We seek to combine profitable underwriting, income from our net commissions and fees, investment returns and efficient capital management to deliver consistent long-term growth in shareholder value.
Through our retail property and casualty agencies, we also generate commission revenue, which represents 1.9% of our total consolidated revenues. Our agencies are located in Michigan, California, Massachusetts, and Florida and produce commercial, personal lines, life and accident and health insurance that is primarily with unaffiliated insurance carriers. These agencies produce a minimal amount of business for our affiliated Insurance Company Subsidiaries.
We recognize revenue related to the services and coverages we provide within the following categories: net earned premiums, management administrative fees, claims fees, commission revenue, net investment income, and net realized gains (losses).
We compete in the specialty insurance market. Our wide range of specialty niche insurance expertise allows us to accommodate a diverse distribution network ranging from specialized program agents to retail agents. In the specialty market, competition tends to place considerable focus on availability, service and other tailored coverages in addition to price. Moreover, our broad geographical footprint enables us to function with a local presence on both a regional and national basis. We also have the capacity to write specialty insurance in both the admitted and non-admitted markets. These unique aspects of our business model enable us to compete on factors other than price.
Critical Accounting Policies
In certain circumstances, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and related footnotes. We evaluate these estimates and assumptions periodically on an on-going basis based on a variety of factors. There can be no assurance, however, that actual results will not be materially different than our estimates and assumptions, and that reported results of operation will not be affected by accounting adjustments needed to reflect changes in these estimates and assumptions. The accounting estimates and related risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2012, are those that we consider to be our critical accounting estimates. For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2012, there have been no material changes in regard to any of our critical accounting estimates.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Net Operating (Loss) Income and Net Operating (Loss) Income Per Share
Net operating (loss) income and net operating (loss) income per share are non-GAAP measures that represent net (loss) income excluding net realized gains or loss, net of tax. The most directly comparable financial GAAP measures to net operating (loss) income and net operating (loss) income per share are net (loss) income and net (loss) income per share. Net operating (loss) income and net operating (loss) income per share are intended as supplemental information and are not meant to replace net (loss) income nor net (loss) income per share. Net operating (loss) income and net operating (loss) income per share should be read in conjunction with the GAAP financial results. The following is a reconciliation of net operating (loss) income to net (loss) income, as well as net operating (loss) income per share to net (loss) income per share:
|
|
For the Three Months
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
For the Six Months
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share
and per share data)
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share
and per share data)
|
|
Net operating (loss) income
|
|
$ |
(8,752 |
) |
|
$ |
8,381 |
|
|
$ |
(1,225 |
) |
|
$ |
22,398 |
|
Net realized gains, net of tax
|
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
|
1,399 |
|
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
2,031 |
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$ |
(7,732 |
) |
|
$ |
9,780 |
|
|
$ |
372 |
|
|
$ |
24,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating (loss) income
|
|
$ |
(0.17 |
) |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
50,251,591 |
|
|
|
53,248,573 |
|
|
|
50,583,368 |
|
|
|
53,323,802 |
|
We use net operating (loss) income and net operating (loss) income per share as components to assess our performance and as measures to evaluate the results of our business. We believe these measures provide investors with valuable information relating to our ongoing performance that may be obscured by the net effect of realized gains and losses as a result of our market risk sensitive instruments, which primarily relate to fixed income securities that are available for sale and not held for trading purposes. Realized gains and losses may vary significantly between periods and are generally driven by external economic developments, such as capital market conditions. Accordingly, net operating (loss) income excludes the effect of items that tend to be highly variable from period to period and highlights the results from our ongoing business operations and the underlying loss or profitability of our business. We believe that it is useful for investors to evaluate net operating (loss) income and net operating (loss) income per share, along with net (loss) income and net (loss) income per share, when reviewing and evaluating our performance.
Accident Year Loss Ratio
The accident year loss ratio is a non-GAAP measure and represents our net loss and LAE ratio adjusted for any changes in net ultimate loss estimates on prior year loss reserves. The most directly comparable financial GAAP measure to the accident year loss ratio is the net loss and LAE ratio. The accident year loss ratio is intended as supplemental information and is not meant to replace the net loss and LAE ratio. The accident year loss ratio should be read in conjunction with the GAAP financial results. The following is a reconciliation of the accident year loss ratio to the net loss and LAE ratio, which is the most directly comparable GAAP measure:
|
|
For the Three Months
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
For the Six Months
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Accident year loss ratio
|
|
|
65.1 |
% |
|
|
66.4 |
% |
|
|
64.4 |
% |
|
|
65.0 |
% |
Increase (decrease) in net ultimate loss estimates on prior year loss reserves
|
|
|
13.3 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
-0.6 |
% |
Net loss & LAE ratio
|
|
|
78.4 |
% |
|
|
66.9 |
% |
|
|
73.9 |
% |
|
|
64.4 |
% |
We use the accident year loss ratio as one component to assess our current year performance and as a measure to evaluate, and if necessary, adjust our pricing and underwriting. Our net loss and LAE ratio is based on calendar year information. Adjusting this ratio to an accident year loss ratio allows us to evaluate information based on the current year activity. We believe this measure provides investors with valuable information for comparison to historical trends and current industry estimates. We also believe that it is useful for investors to evaluate the accident year loss ratio and net loss and LAE ratio separately when reviewing and evaluating our performance.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012 AND 2011
Executive Overview
Our results for the second quarter of 2012 were impacted by the increase in net ultimate loss estimates for 2011 and prior accident years, which added 13.3 percentage points to the GAAP combined ratio. The second quarter 2012 increase in net ultimate loss estimates for accident years 2011 and prior primarily reflects incurred large loss activity that is higher than historic patterns. In certain segments of the business, this increase is connected to corporate and branch office claims initiatives that were recently implemented. Our GAAP combined ratio was 111.1% for the second quarter of 2012 compared to 101.4% for the comparable quarter in 2011. Our accident year combined ratio was 97.8% for the second quarter of 2012, compared to 100.9% in 2011.
Net operating loss, a non-GAAP measure, for the second quarter ended June 30, 2012 was ($8.8 million), or ($0.17) per diluted share, compared to net operating income of $8.4 million, or $0.16 per diluted share for the second quarter ended June 30, 2011. The second quarter 2012 results include the pre-tax increase in net ultimate loss estimates for 2011 and prior accident years of $28.2 million. By contrast, the second quarter of 2011 results include the pre-tax increase in net ultimate loss estimates for 2010 and prior accident years of $0.9 million.
Gross written premium increased $43.4 million, or 20.4%, to $256.1 million, compared to $212.7 million in 2011. The growth primarily reflects rate increases in combination with the maturation of existing programs and to a lesser extent new business initiatives that were implemented during the past twelve months. This growth was partially offset by reductions in certain programs where pricing and underwriting did not meet our targets.
Results of Operations
Net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2012, was ($7.7 million), or ($0.15) per dilutive share, compared to net income of $9.8 million, or $0.18 per dilutive share, for the comparable period of 2011. Net operating loss, a non-GAAP measure, for the second quarter ended June 30, 2012 was ($8.8 million), or ($0.17) per diluted share, compared to net operating income of $8.4 million, or $0.16 per diluted share for the second quarter ended June 30, 2011. Total diluted weighted average shares outstanding for the three months ended June 30, 2012 were 50,251,591 compared to 53,248,573 for the comparable period in 2011. This decrease reflects the impact of our Share Repurchase Plan, which we have continued to repurchase shares.
Revenues
Revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2012, increased $30.9 million, or 15.1%, to $235.1 million, from $204.2 million for the comparable period in 2011. This increase primarily reflects overall growth within our net earned premiums.
The following table sets forth the components of revenues (in thousands):
|
|
For the Three Months
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earned premiums
|
|
$ |
211,303 |
|
|
$ |
181,470 |
|
Management administrative fees
|
|
|
2,823 |
|
|
|
3,041 |
|
Claims fees
|
|
|
1,599 |
|
|
|
1,606 |
|
Commission revenue
|
|
|
4,130 |
|
|
|
3,250 |
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
13,683 |
|
|
|
13,765 |
|
Net realized gains
|
|
|
1,567 |
|
|
|
1,094 |
|
Total revenue
|
|
$ |
235,105 |
|
|
$ |
204,226 |
|
Net earned premiums increased $29.8 million, or 16.4%, to $211.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, from $181.5 million in the comparable period in 2011. This growth primarily reflects rate increase in combination with the maturation of existing programs and to a lesser extent new business initiatives that were implemented during the past twelve months. This growth was partially offset by reductions in certain programs where pricing and underwriting did not meet our targets.
Commission revenue increased $0.9 million, or 27.1%, to $4.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, from $3.3 million for the comparable period in 2011. This increase was driven primarily by commission revenues generated from assets of a Michigan agency that was acquired in the fourth quarter of 2011.
Expenses
Expenses increased $52.9 million from $192.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 to $245.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012.
The following table sets forth the components of expenses (in thousands):
|
|
For the Three Months
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
$ |
165,758 |
|
|
$ |
121,403 |
|
Policy acquisition and other underwriting expenses
|
|
|
68,993 |
|
|
|
62,694 |
|
General selling & administrative expenses
|
|
|
6,327 |
|
|
|
5,631 |
|
General corporate expenses
|
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
(719 |
) |
Amortization expense
|
|
|
1,307 |
|
|
|
1,206 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
2,033 |
|
|
|
2,082 |
|
Total expenses
|
|
$ |
245,176 |
|
|
$ |
192,297 |
|
Net loss and loss adjustment expenses (“LAE”) increased $44.4 million, to $165.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, from $121.4 million for the same period in 2011. Our loss and LAE ratio was 78.4% for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 66.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The loss and LAE ratio for the second quarter of 2012 includes a 13.3 percentage point increase from net ultimate loss estimates for accident years 2011 and prior, whereas the 2011 results include a 0.5 percentage point increase from net ultimate loss estimates for accident years 2010 and prior. The accident year loss and LAE ratio was 65.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2012 down from 66.4% in the comparable period in 2011. Additional discussion of our reserve activity is described below within the Other Items ~ Reserves section.
Policy acquisition and other underwriting expenses increased $6.3 million, to $69.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from $62.7 million for the same period in 2011. Our expense ratio decreased 1.8 percentage points to 32.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2012, from 34.5% for the same period in 2011. The 2012 expense ratio improvement reflects a reduction in profit sharing commissions and leveraging of fixed costs over a larger premium base. These were partially offset by a reduction in the accrual for variable compensation that reduced policy acquisition expenses in 2011.
General corporate expenses increased $1.5 million, to $0.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, from a benefit of $0.7 million for the same period in 2011. The prior year amount reflects a reduction in the accrual for variable compensation; excluding this item, 2012 general corporate expenses were consistent with 2011.
The GAAP effective tax rate for both the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, was approximately 18%. Income tax expense (benefit) on capital gains and the change in our valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, was $547,000 and ($306,000) for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The annual effective tax rate for 2012 is expected to be approximately 15%.
Other Items
Equity earnings of affiliated, net of tax;
In July 2009, our subsidiary, Star, purchased a 28.5% ownership interest in an affiliate, Midwest Financial Holdings, LLC (“MFH”), for $14.8 million in cash. We are not required to consolidate this investment as we are not the primary beneficiary of the business nor do we control the entity’s operations. Our ownership interest is significant, but is less than a majority ownership and, therefore, we are accounting for this investment under the equity method of accounting. Star recognizes 28.5% of the profits and losses as a result of this equity interest ownership. We recognized equity earnings, net of tax, from MFH of $0.6 million, or $0.01 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to $0.2 million, which had no per diluted share impact, for the comparable period of 2011. We received dividends from MFH in the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, of $0.9 million and $1.2 million, respectively.
Reserves
For the three months ended June 30, 2012, we reported an increase in net ultimate loss estimates for accident years 2011 and prior of $28.2 million, or 3.2% of $879.1 million of net loss and LAE reserves at December 31, 2011. There were no significant changes in the key assumptions utilized in the analysis and calculations of our reserves during 2011 and 2012.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012 AND 2011
Executive Overview
Our results for the six months ended June 30, 2012, were impacted by the increase in net ultimate loss estimates for 2011 and prior accident years, which added 9.5 percentage points to the GAAP combined ratio. The year-to-date 2012 increase in net ultimate loss estimates for accident years 2011 and prior primarily reflects incurred large loss activity that is higher than historic patterns. Our GAAP combined ratio was 106.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to 98.7% for the comparable quarter in 2011. Our accident year combined ratio was 97.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to 99.3% in 2011.
Net operating loss, a non-GAAP measure, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was ($1.2 million), or ($0.02) per diluted share, compared to net operating income of $22.4 million, or $0.42 per diluted share for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The six months ended June 30, 2012, results include the pre-tax increase in net ultimate loss estimates for 2011 and prior accident years of $38.4 million. By contrast, the six months ended 2011 results include an after-tax decrease in net ultimate loss estimates for 2010 and prior accident years of $2.4 million.
Gross written premium increased $76.4 million, or 17.5%, to $514.0 million, compared to $437.6 million in 2011. The growth primarily reflects rate increases in combination with the maturation of existing programs and to a lesser extent new business initiatives that were implemented during the past twelve months. This growth was partially offset by reductions in certain programs where pricing and underwriting did not meet our targets.
Results of Operations
Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2012, was $0.4 million, or $0.01 per diluted share, compared to net income of $24.4 million, or $0.46 per diluted share, for the comparable period of 2011. Net operating loss, a non-GAAP measure, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was ($1.2 million), or ($0.02) per diluted share, compared to net operating income of $22.4 million, or $0.42 per diluted share for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Total diluted weighted average shares outstanding for the six months ended June 30, 2012 were 50,583,368 compared to 53,323,802 for the comparable period in 2011. This decrease reflects the impact of our Share Repurchase Plan, which we have continued to repurchase shares.
Revenues
Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2012, increased $53.6 million, or 13.5%, to $451.3 million, from $397.7 million for the comparable period in 2011. This increase primarily reflects overall growth within our net earned premiums.
The following table sets forth the components of revenues (in thousands):
|
|
For the Six Months
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earned premiums
|
|
$ |
404,118 |
|
|
$ |
352,128 |
|
Management administrative fees
|
|
|
5,751 |
|
|
|
6,399 |
|
Claims fees
|
|
|
3,261 |
|
|
|
3,213 |
|
Commission revenue
|
|
|
8,505 |
|
|
|
6,723 |
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
27,415 |
|
|
|
27,337 |
|
Net realized gains
|
|
|
2,299 |
|
|
|
1,906 |
|
Total revenue
|
|
$ |
451,349 |
|
|
$ |
397,706 |
|
Net earned premiums increased $52.0 million, or 14.8%, to $404.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, from $352.1 million in the comparable period in 2011. This growth primarily reflects rate increases in combination with the maturation of existing programs and to a lesser extent new business initiatives that were implemented during the past twelve months. This growth was partially offset by reductions in certain programs where pricing and underwriting did not meet our targets.
Commission revenue increased $1.8 million, or 26.5%, to $8.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, from $6.7 million for the comparable period in 2011. This increase was driven primarily by commission revenues generated from assets of a Michigan agency that was acquired in the fourth quarter of 2011.
Expenses
Expenses increased $85.4 million from $366.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 to $452.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012.
The following table sets forth the components of expenses (in thousands):
|
|
For the Six Months
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
$ |
298,505 |
|
|
$ |
226,665 |
|
Policy acquisition and other underwriting expenses
|
|
|
132,106 |
|
|
|
120,851 |
|
General selling & administrative expenses
|
|
|
12,666 |
|
|
|
11,875 |
|
General corporate expenses
|
|
|
2,131 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
2,723 |
|
|
|
2,438 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,010 |
|
|
|
4,254 |
|
Total expenses
|
|
$ |
452,141 |
|
|
$ |
366,719 |
|
Net loss and LAE increased $71.8 million, to $298.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, from $226.7 million for the same period in 2011. Our loss and LAE ratio was 73.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 64.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The loss and LAE ratio for the second quarter of 2012 include a 9.5 percentage point increase from net ultimate loss estimates for accident years 2011 and prior, whereas the 2011 results include a 0.6 percentage point decrease from net ultimate loss estimates for accident years 2010 and prior. The accident year loss and LAE ratio was 64.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2012 down from 65.0% in the comparable period in 2011. Additional discussion of our reserve activity is described below within the Other Items ~ Reserves section.
Policy acquisition and other underwriting expenses increased $11.3 million, to $132.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 from $120.9 million for the same period in 2011. Our expense ratio decreased 1.6 percentage points to 32.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2012, from 34.3% for the same period in 2011. The 2012 expense ratio improvement reflects a reduction in profit sharing commissions and leveraging of fixed costs over a larger premium base.
General corporate expenses increased $1.5 million, to $2.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, from $0.6 million for the same period in 2011. The prior year amount reflects a reduction in the accrual for variable compensation; excluding this item, 2012 general corporate expenses were consistent with 2011.
The GAAP effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was approximately 15%, compared to 24%, for the same period in 2011. Income tax expense (benefit) on capital gains and the change in our valuation allowance on deferred tax assets was $702,000 and ($126,000) for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The lower rate reflects a higher proportion of taxable income derived from net investment income, which includes a portion of tax exempt income, rather than, fee based or underwriting income. The annual effective tax rate for 2012 is expected to be approximately 15%.
Other Items
Equity earnings of affiliated, net of tax;
In July 2009, our subsidiary, Star, purchased a 28.5% ownership interest in an affiliate, Midwest Financial Holdings, LLC (“MFH”), for $14.8 million in cash. We are not required to consolidate this investment as we are not the primary beneficiary of the business nor do we control the entity’s operations. Our ownership interest is significant, but is less than a majority ownership and, therefore, we are accounting for this investment under the equity method of accounting. Star recognizes 28.5% of the profits and losses as a result of this equity interest ownership. We recognized equity earnings, net of tax, from MFH of $1.3 million, or $0.02 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to $1.2 million, or $0.02 per diluted share, for the comparable period of 2011. We received dividends from MFH in the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, for $1.8 million and $1.7 million, respectively.
Reserves
At June 30, 2012 our best estimate for the ultimate liability for loss and LAE reserves, net of reinsurance recoverables, was $951.6 million. We established a reasonable range of reserves of approximately $875.5 million to $1.0 billion. This range was established primarily by considering the various indications derived from standard actuarial techniques and other appropriate reserve considerations. The following table sets forth this range by line of business (in thousands):
Line of Business
|
|
Minimum
Reserve
Range
|
|
|
Maximum
Reserve
Range
|
|
|
Selected
Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workers' Compensation
|
|
$ |
363,707 |
|
|
$ |
415,290 |
|
|
$ |
389,086 |
|
Residual Markets
|
|
|
16,094 |
|
|
|
17,825 |
|
|
|
17,307 |
|
Commercial Multiple Peril / General Liability
|
|
|
346,339 |
|
|
|
429,171 |
|
|
|
386,092 |
|
Commercial Automobile
|
|
|
115,851 |
|
|
|
130,613 |
|
|
|
123,464 |
|
Other
|
|
|
33,510 |
|
|
|
37,603 |
|
|
|
35,692 |
|
Total Net Reserves
|
|
$ |
875,501 |
|
|
$ |
1,030,502 |
|
|
$ |
951,641 |
|
Reserves are reviewed and established by our internal actuaries for adequacy and are peer reviewed by our third-party actuaries. When reviewing reserves, we analyze historical data and estimate the impact of numerous factors such as (1) per claim information; (2) industry and our historical loss experience; (3) legislative enactments, judicial decisions, legal developments in the imposition of damages, and changes in political attitudes; and (4) trends in general economic conditions, including the effects of inflation. This process assumes that past experience, adjusted for the effects of current developments and anticipated trends, is an appropriate basis for predicting future events. There is no precise method for subsequently evaluating the impact of any specific factor on the adequacy of reserves, because the eventual deficiency or redundancy is affected by multiple factors.
The key assumptions used in our selection of ultimate reserves included the underlying actuarial methodologies, a review of current pricing and underwriting initiatives, an evaluation of reinsurance costs and retention levels, and a detailed claims analysis with an emphasis on how aggressive claims handling may be impacting the paid and incurred loss data trends embedded in the traditional actuarial methods. With respect to the ultimate estimates for losses and LAE, the key assumptions remained consistent for the six months ended June 30, 2012, and the year ended December 31, 2011.
For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we reported an increase in net ultimate loss estimates for accident years 2011 and prior of $38.4 million, or 4.4% of $879.1 million of beginning net loss and LAE reserves at December 31, 2011. The change in net ultimate loss estimates reflected revisions in the estimated reserves as a result of actual claims activity in calendar year 2012 that differed from the projected activity. There were no significant changes in the key assumptions utilized in the analysis and calculations of our reserves during 2011 and for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The major components of this change in ultimates are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Incurred Losses
|
|
|
Paid Losses
|
|
|
|
|
Line of Business
|
|
Reserves at
December 31,
2011
|
|
|
Current
Year
|
|
|
Prior
Years
|
|
|
Total
Incurred
|
|
|
Current
Year
|
|
|
Prior
Years
|
|
|
Total
Paid
|
|
|
Reserves at
June 30,
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workers' Compensation
|
|
$ |
358,131 |
|
|
$ |
107,272 |
|
|
$ |
10,873 |
|
|
$ |
118,145 |
|
|
$ |
10,429 |
|
|
$ |
76,761 |
|
|
$ |
87,190 |
|
|
$ |
389,086 |
|
Residual Markets
|
|
|
17,682 |
|
|
|
2,027 |
|
|
|
(732 |
) |
|
|
1,295 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
1,078 |
|
|
|
1,670 |
|
|
|
17,307 |
|
Commercial Multiple Peril /General Liability
|
|
|
353,311 |
|
|
|
72,494 |
|
|
|
16,491 |
|
|
|
88,985 |
|
|
|
2,841 |
|
|
|
53,363 |
|
|
|
56,204 |
|
|
|
386,092 |
|
Commercial Automobile
|
|
|
117,594 |
|
|
|
44,482 |
|
|
|
9,043 |
|
|
|
53,525 |
|
|
|
10,828 |
|
|
|
36,827 |
|
|
|
47,655 |
|
|
|
123,464 |
|
Other
|
|
|
32,375 |
|
|
|
33,804 |
|
|
|
2,751 |
|
|
|
36,555 |
|
|
|
14,923 |
|
|
|
18,315 |
|
|
|
33,238 |
|
|
|
35,692 |
|
Net Reserves
|
|
|
879,093 |
|
|
$ |
260,079 |
|
|
$ |
38,426 |
|
|
$ |
298,505 |
|
|
$ |
39,613 |
|
|
$ |
186,344 |
|
|
$ |
225,957 |
|
|
|
951,641 |
|
Reinsurance Recoverable
|
|
|
315,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349,361 |
|
Consolidated
|
|
$ |
1,194,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,301,002 |
|
The following table shows the re-estimated December 31, 2011 held reserves by line of business as of June 30, 2012 (in thousands):
Line of Business
|
|
Reserves at
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
Total
Re-estimated Reserves at
June 30, 2012
on Prior Years
|
|
|
Development as a
Percentage of
Prior Year
Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workers' Compensation
|
|
$ |
358,131 |
|
|
$ |
369,004 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
Commercial Multiple Peril / General Liability
|
|
|
353,311 |
|
|
|
369,802 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
Commercial Automobile
|
|
|
117,594 |
|
|
|
126,637 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
% |
Other
|
|
|
32,375 |
|
|
|
35,126 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
% |
Sub-total
|
|
|
861,411 |
|
|
|
900,569 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
Residual Markets
|
|
|
17,682 |
|
|
|
16,950 |
|
|
|
-4.1 |
% |
Total Net Reserves
|
|
$ |
879,093 |
|
|
$ |
917,519 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
Workers’ Compensation Excluding Residual Markets
The net ultimate loss estimates for accident years 2011 and prior in the workers' compensation line of business increased $10.9 million, or 3.0%. This was driven primarily by accident years 2009 through 2011. The increase in net ultimate loss estimates is $3.0 million, $4.6 million, and $3.5 million for the 2011, 2010 and 2009 accident years, respectively. These increases were partially offset by a reduction in net ultimate loss estimates for accident years 2008 and prior.
In this line of business we continue to see favorable overall underwriting results. In California, where we have achieved a cumulative filed rate increase of 41.4% starting in 2009, our workers’ compensation business remains profitable. These rate increases have exceeded loss cost trends. However, we have slightly increased loss estimates for prior accident years. In other areas of the country, underwriting actions and rate increases have been effective and ultimate loss estimates have decreased.
Commercial Multiple Peril / General Liability
The $16.5 million increase, or 4.7%, in net ultimate loss estimates in the commercial multiple peril/general liability line of business is primarily from higher than expected large case reserve movement in our Public Entity Excess liability program by about $9.6 million. As a result of our ongoing and proactive oversight of the primary claim management process within our insureds’ underlying self-insured layer, particularly on high exposure cases, we believe our reserving to the ultimate probable costs per file has accelerated at a pace that is unprecedented in this program. While we adjusted for this acceleration we also recognized a need for higher ultimate loss estimates and these additions totaled $9.6 million as noted above.
The remainder of the increase in net ultimate loss estimates for accident years 2011 and prior was driven by a number of large claims that were strengthened in the second quarter of 2012.
Commercial Automobile
The $9.0 million increase, or 7.7%, in net ultimate loss estimates for the commercial automobile line of business is primarily in the 2011 and 2010 accident years and also reflects the emergence of higher than expected large loss activity. The increase in net ultimate loss estimates includes the policies written prior to July 2011 on our transportation program and slightly higher than expected severity on a smaller west coast based program. The Company has been aggressively raising rates and reducing premium volume to lower future loss ratios in this line of business.
Cumulative rate increases in the transportation program have been approximately 46% since 2010 and exposure base is down more than 50%. As these rate increases continue to earn out in 2012, we expect improved current accident year results for this business.
Other
The $2.8 million increase, or 8.5%, in net ultimate loss estimates in the other lines of business is primarily from 2011 accident year property exposures where we had a handful of larger claims that occurred in late 2011, but were not reported until the first quarter of 2012. These occurrences were partially offset by better than expected frequency in our medical malpractice line of business.
Cumulative rate increases in other lines since 2009 have been approximately 4.6%.
Residual Markets
The workers’ compensation residual market line of business had a decrease in net ultimate loss estimate of $0.7 million, or 4.1% of net reserves. This decrease reflects reductions in various accident years. We record loss reserves as reported by the National Council on Compensation Insurance (“NCCI”), plus a provision for the reserves incurred but not yet analyzed and reported to us due to a two quarter lag in reporting. These changes reflect a difference between our estimate of the lag incurred but not reported and the amounts reported by the NCCI in the year.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our principal sources of funds are insurance premiums, investment income, proceeds from the maturity and sale of invested assets from our Insurance Company Subsidiaries, and risk management fees and agency commissions from our non-regulated subsidiaries. Funds are primarily used for the payment of claims, commissions, salaries and employee benefits, other operating expenses, shareholder dividends, share repurchases, capital expenditures, and debt service.
A significant portion of our consolidated assets represents assets of our Insurance Company Subsidiaries that may not be transferable to the holding company in the form of dividends, loans or advances in accordance with state insurance laws. These laws generally specify that dividends can be paid only from unassigned surplus and only to the extent that all dividends in the current twelve months do not exceed the greater of 10% of total statutory surplus as of the end of the prior fiscal year or 100% of the statutory net income for the prior year, less any dividends paid in the prior twelve months. Using these criteria, the ordinary dividend available that can be paid from the Insurance Company Subsidiaries during 2012 is $41.2 million without prior regulatory approval. Of this $41.2 million, ordinary dividends of $12.5 million have been declared and paid as of June 30, 2012. In addition to ordinary dividends, the Insurance Company Subsidiaries have the capacity to pay $96.0 million of extraordinary dividends in 2012, subject to prior regulatory approval. The Insurance Company Subsidiaries’ ability to pay future dividends without advance regulatory approval is dependent upon maintaining a positive level of unassigned surplus, which in turn, is dependent upon the Insurance Company Subsidiaries generating net income. Total ordinary dividends paid from our Insurance Company Subsidiaries to our holding company were $12.5 million and zero for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. We remain within our targets as they relate to our premium leverage ratios, taking into consideration the dividends paid by our Insurance Company Subsidiaries. Our guidelines for gross and net written premium to statutory surplus are 2.75 to 1.0 and 2.25 to 1.0, respectively. As of June 30, 2012, on a trailing twelve month statutory consolidated basis, the gross and net premium leverage ratios were 2.6 to 1.0 and 2.2 to 1.0, respectively.
We also generate operating cash flow from non-regulated subsidiaries in the form of commission revenue, outside management fees, and intercompany management fees. These sources of income are available for debt service, shareholders’ dividends, and other operating expenses of the holding company and non-regulated subsidiaries. Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization from non-regulated subsidiaries were approximately $5.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012.
We have a total revolving credit facility of $35.0 million, which may include up to $15.0 million in letters of credit. As of June 30, 2012, we had $14.5 million outstanding balance on our revolving credit facility and $0.5 million in letters of credit issued. The undrawn portion of the revolving credit facility is available to finance working capital and for general corporate purposes, including but not limited to, surplus contributions to our Insurance Company Subsidiaries to support premium growth or strategic acquisitions.
Based on our subsidiaries’ subsidiaries’ membership in the FHLBI, we have the ability to borrow on a collateralized basis at relatively low borrowing rates, providing a source of liquidity. As of June 30, 2012, we had borrowed $30.0 million from the FHLBI. The proceeds were used to fund purchases of high quality bonds with maturities that match the maturity of the FHLBI credit facility. Due to the low cost of the FHLBI funding, the Company expects to generate returns in excess of its cost of borrowing under this strategy. We have the ability to increase our borrowing capacity through additional investments and pledging additional securities.
Cash flow provided by operations was $73.0 million and $61.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increase in operating cash flows is driven primarily by a decrease in estimated federal income tax payments in the current year. We maintain a strong balance sheet with diversified geographic risks, high quality reinsurance and a high quality investment portfolio.
Other Items – Liquidity and Capital Resources
Interest Rate Swaps
We have entered into interest rate swap transactions to mitigate our interest rate risk on our existing debt obligations. These interest rate swap transactions have been designated as cash flow hedges and are deemed highly effective hedges. These interest rate swap transactions are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet and the effective portion of the changes in fair value are accounted for within other comprehensive income. The interest differential to be paid or received is accrued and recognized as an adjustment to interest expense.
Refer to Note 5 ~ Derivative Instruments of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional information specific to our interest rate swaps.
Refer to Note 4 ~ Debt of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional information specific to our credit facilities and debentures.
Investment Portfolio
As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the recorded values of our investment portfolio, including cash and cash equivalents, were $1.6 billion and $1.5 billion, respectively.
In general, we believe our overall investment portfolio is conservatively invested. The effective duration of the investment portfolio at June 30, 2012, is 4.9 years, compared to 5.0 years at June 30, 2011. Our pre-tax book yield as of June 30, 2012 is 3.9%, compared to 4.2% in 2011. The current after-tax yield is 3.0% as of June 30, 2012, compared to 3.1% in 2011. Approximately 99.1% of our fixed income investment portfolio is investment grade.
Shareholders’ Equity
Refer to Note 7 ~ Shareholders’ Equity of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
For the six months ended June 30, 2012, there were no material changes in relation to our contractual obligations and commitments, outside of the ordinary course of our business.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Refer to Note 1 ~ Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates as well as other relevant market rate or price changes. The volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the underlying assets are traded directly influence market risk. The following is a discussion of our primary risk exposures and how those exposures are currently managed as of June 30, 2012. Our market risk sensitive instruments are primarily related to fixed income securities, which are available for sale and not held for trading purposes.
Interest rate risk is managed within the context of an asset and liability management strategy where the target duration for the fixed income portfolio is based on the estimate of the liability duration and takes into consideration our surplus. The investment policy guidelines provide for a fixed income portfolio duration of between three and a half and five and a half years. At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, our fixed income portfolio had an effective duration of 4.9 years.
At June 30, 2012, the fair value of our investment portfolio, excluding cash and cash equivalents, was $1.5 billion. Our market risk relating to the investment portfolio is primarily interest rate risk associated with debt securities. Our exposure to equity price risk is related to our investments in relatively small positions of preferred stocks and mutual funds with an emphasis on dividend income. These investments comprised 1.7% of our investment portfolio as of June 30, 2012.
Our investment philosophy is one of maximizing after-tax earnings and has historically included significant investments in tax-exempt bonds. We continue to increase our holdings of tax-exempt securities based on our desire to maximize after-tax investment income. For our investment portfolio, there were no significant changes in our primary market risk exposures or in how those exposures are managed compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. We do not anticipate significant changes in our primary market risk exposures or in how those exposures are managed in future reporting periods based upon what is known or expected to be in effect.
A sensitivity analysis is defined as the measurement of potential loss in future earnings, fair values, or cash flows of market sensitive instruments resulting from one or more selected hypothetical changes in interest rates and other market rates or prices over a selected period. In our sensitivity analysis model, a hypothetical change in market rates is selected that is expected to reflect reasonable possible near-term changes in those rates. “Near term” means a period of up to one year from the date of the consolidated financial statements. In our sensitivity model, we use a hypothetical change to measure our potential loss in fair value of debt securities assuming an upward and downward parallel shift in interest rates. The table below presents our model’s estimate of changes in fair values given a change in interest rates. Dollar values are in thousands.
|
Rates Down 100bps
|
Rates Unchanged
|
Rates Up 100bps
|
Fair Value
|
$1,526,846
|
$1,465,999
|
$1,394,724
|
Yield to Maturity or Call
|
1.55%
|
2.28%
|
3.26%
|
Effective Duration
|
4.6
|
4.9
|
5.0
|
The other financial instruments, which include cash and cash equivalents, equity securities, premium receivables, reinsurance recoverables, line of credit and other assets and liabilities, when included in the sensitivity model, do not produce a material change in fair values.
Our debentures are subject to variable interest rates. Thus, our interest expense on these debentures is directly correlated to market interest rates. At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had outstanding debentures of $80.9 million. At this level, a 100 basis point (1%) change in market rates would change annual interest expense by $809,000.
Our term loan is subject to variable interest rates. Thus, our interest expense on our term loan is directly correlated to market interest rates. At June 30, 2012, we had an outstanding balance on our term loan of $16.5 million. At this level, a 100 basis point (1%) change in market rates would change annual interest expense by $165,000. At December 31, 2011, we had an outstanding balance on our term loan of $23.9 million. At this level, a 100 basis point (1%) change in market rates would change annual interest expense by $239,000.
We have entered into interest rate swap transactions to mitigate our interest rate risk on our existing debt obligations. These interest rate swap transactions have been designated as cash flow hedges and are deemed highly effective hedges. These interest rate swap transactions are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet and the effective portion of the changes in fair value are accounted for within other comprehensive income. The interest differential to be paid or received is accrued and recognized as an adjustment to interest expense. Refer to Note 5 ~ Derivative Instruments of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, for further detail relating to our interest rate swap transactions.
In addition, our revolving line of credit under which we can borrow up to $35.0 million is subject to variable interest rates. Thus, our interest expense on the revolving line of credit is directly correlated to market interest rates. At June 30, 2012, we had a $14.5 million outstanding balance on our line of credit. At this level, a 100 basis point (1%) change in market rates would change annual interest expense by $145,000. At December 31, 2011, we had $4.5 million outstanding on this revolving line of credit. At this level, a 100 basis point (1%) change in market rates would have changed annual interest expense by $45,000. At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, $0.5 million in letters of credit had been issued.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the “Exchange Act”), which we refer to as disclosure controls, are controls and procedures that are designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this Form 10-Q, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls are also designed with the objective of ensuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any control system. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance that its objectives are met. No evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected.
As of June 30, 2012, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of disclosure controls. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls were effective in recording, processing, summarizing, and reporting, on a timely basis, material information required to be disclosed in the reports we file under the Exchange Act and is accumulated and communicated, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three month period ended June 30, 2012, which have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
The information required by this item is included under Note 9 - Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company’s Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2012, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
There have been no material changes to the Risk Factors previously disclosed in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
In October 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized management to purchase up to 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in market transactions for a period not to exceed twenty-four months.
The following table represents information with respect to repurchases of the Company’s common stock for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012:
Period
|
|
Total
Number of
Shares
Repurchased
|
|
|
Average
Price Paid
Per Share
|
|
|
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs
|
|
|
Maximum
Number of
Shares that may
still be
Repurchased
Under the Plans
or Programs
|
|
April 1 - April 30, 2012
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,470,000 |
|
May 1 - May 31, 2012
|
|
|
513,000 |
|
|
|
8.88 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,957,000 |
|
June 1 - June 30, 2012
|
|
|
224,300 |
|
|
|
8.73 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,732,700 |
|
Total
|
|
|
737,300 |
|
|
$ |
8.84 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
The following documents are filed as part of this Report:
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
|
|
31.1
|
Certification of Robert S. Cubbin, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a).
|
|
|
31.2
|
Certification of Karen M. Spaun, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a).
|
|
|
32.1
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Robert S. Cubbin, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation.
|
|
|
32.2
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Karen M. Spaun, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation.
|
|
|
101
|
Interactive Data File
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ |
Karen M. Spaun
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 9, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBITS INDEX
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
|
|
|
Certification of Robert S. Cubbin, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a).
|
|
|
|
Certification of Karen M. Spaun, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a).
|
|
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Robert S. Cubbin, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation.
|
|
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Karen M. Spaun, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation.
|
|
|
101
|
Interactive Data File
|