ahh_Current_Folio_10Q

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 


FORM 10-Q

 


 

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016

 

or

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from                      to                     

 

Commission file number: 001-35908

 


 

ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 


 

 

 

Maryland

46-1214914

(State of Organization)

(IRS Employer

Identification No.)

 

 

222 Central Park Avenue, Suite 2100

Virginia Beach, Virginia

23462

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(Zip Code)

 

(757) 366-4000

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

 


 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.      Yes       No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).      Yes       No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

 

 

 

 

Large Accelerated Filer

Accelerated Filer

 

 

 

 

Non-Accelerated Filer

  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).      Yes       No

 

As of April 30, 2016, the Registrant had 31,310,075 shares of common stock outstanding.

 

 

 


 

Table of Contents

ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.

 

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2016

 

Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

Page

 

 

Part I. Financial Information 

 

 

 

Item 1. 

Financial Statements

 

 

 

Item 2. 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

20 

 

 

 

Item 3. 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

36 

 

 

 

Item 4. 

Controls and Procedures

37 

 

 

Part II. Other Information 

38 

 

 

 

Item 1. 

Legal Proceedings

38 

 

 

 

Item 1A. 

Risk Factors

38 

 

 

 

Item 2. 

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

38 

 

 

 

Item 3. 

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

38 

 

 

 

Item 4. 

Mine Safety Disclosures

38 

 

 

 

Item 5. 

Other Information

39 

 

 

 

Item 6. 

Exhibits

39 

 

 

Signatures 

40 

 

 

 


 

Table of Contents

PART I. Financial Information

 

Item 1.Financial Statements

 

ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

(In thousands, except par value and share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31, 

 

December 31, 

 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

 

 

(UNAUDITED)

 

 

 

 

ASSETS

    

 

    

 

 

Real estate investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income producing property

 

$

722,123

 

$

579,000

 

Held for development

 

 

1,995

 

 

1,180

 

Construction in progress

 

 

62,365

 

 

53,411

 

 

 

 

786,483

 

 

633,591

 

Accumulated depreciation

 

 

(121,920)

 

 

(125,380)

 

Net real estate investments

 

 

664,563

 

 

508,211

 

Real estate investments held for sale

 

 

2,731

 

 

40,232

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

18,810

 

 

26,989

 

Restricted cash

 

 

3,695

 

 

2,824

 

Accounts receivable, net

 

 

13,360

 

 

21,982

 

Notes receivable

 

 

10,464

 

 

7,825

 

Construction receivables, including retentions

 

 

31,567

 

 

36,535

 

Construction contract costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings

 

 

300

 

 

88

 

Other assets

 

 

64,493

 

 

44,861

 

Total Assets

 

$

809,983

 

$

689,547

 

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Indebtedness, net

 

$

460,938

 

$

377,593

 

Debt secured by real estate investments held for sale

 

 

6,373

 

 

 —

 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

 

6,812

 

 

6,472

 

Construction payables, including retentions

 

 

43,611

 

 

52,067

 

Billings in excess of construction contract costs and estimated earnings

 

 

3,177

 

 

2,224

 

Other liabilities

 

 

33,820

 

 

25,471

 

Total Liabilities

 

$

554,731

 

$

463,827

 

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 31,094,560 and 30,076,359 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively

 

 

310

 

 

300

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

113,105

 

 

102,906

 

Distributions in excess of earnings

 

 

(41,244)

 

 

(53,010)

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

 —

 

 

(648)

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

72,171

 

 

49,548

 

Noncontrolling interests

 

 

183,081

 

 

176,172

 

Total Equity

 

 

255,252

 

 

225,720

 

Total Liabilities and Equity

 

$

809,983

 

$

689,547

 

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

1


 

Table of Contents

 

 

ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

 

(In thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended March 31, 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

Revenues

 

 

    

 

 

 

Rental revenues

$

23,283

 

$

18,190

 

General contracting and real estate services revenues

 

36,803

 

 

29,071

 

Total revenues

 

60,086

 

 

47,261

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental expenses

 

5,329

 

 

4,760

 

Real estate taxes

 

2,349

 

 

1,657

 

General contracting and real estate services expenses

 

35,037

 

 

28,142

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

8,149

 

 

4,908

 

General and administrative expenses

 

2,484

 

 

2,328

 

Acquisition, development and other pursuit costs

 

704

 

 

171

 

Impairment charges

 

35

 

 

 —

 

Total expenses

 

54,087

 

 

41,966

 

Operating income

 

5,999

 

 

5,295

 

Interest income

 

182

 

 

 —

 

Interest expense

 

(3,791)

 

 

(3,046)

 

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 

 

 

(227)

 

Gain on real estate dispositions and acquisitions

 

26,674

 

 

6,197

 

Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives

 

(2,389)

 

 

(147)

 

Other income

 

76

 

 

15

 

Income before taxes

 

26,751

 

 

8,087

 

Income tax (provision) benefit

 

(218)

 

 

31

 

Net income

 

26,533

 

 

8,118

 

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 

(9,163)

 

 

(3,013)

 

Net income attributable to stockholders

$

17,370

 

$

5,105

 

Net income per share and unit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted

$

0.57

 

$

0.20

 

Weighted-average outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common shares

 

30,191

 

 

25,042

 

Common units

 

16,027

 

 

14,776

 

Basic and diluted

 

46,218

 

 

39,818

 

Dividends and distributions declared per common share and unit

$

0.18

 

$

0.17

 

Comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

$

26,533

 

$

8,118

 

Unrealized cash flow hedge losses

 

 -

 

 

(786)

 

Comprehensive income

 

26,533

 

 

7,332

 

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 

(9,163)

 

 

(2,722)

 

Comprehensive income attributable to stockholders

$

17,370

 

$

4,610

 

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

2


 

Table of Contents

 

 

ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Equity

 

(In thousands, except share data)

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares of

 

 

 

Additional

 

Distributions

 

other

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

common

 

Common

 

paid-

 

in excess of

 

comprehensive

 

 

stockholders’

 

Noncontrolling

 

Total

 

 

  

stock

  

stock

  

in capital

  

earnings

  

loss

  

equity 

  

interests

  

Equity

 

Balance, January 1, 2016

 

30,076,359

 

$

300

 

$

102,906

 

$

(53,010)

 

$

(648)

     

$

49,548

 

$

176,172

 

$

225,720

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,370

 

 

 —

 

 

17,370

 

 

9,163

 

 

26,533

 

Dedesignation of cash flow hedge

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

648

 

 

648

 

 

400

 

 

1,048

 

Net proceeds from sales of common stock

 

937,404

 

 

9

 

 

9,807

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

9,816

 

 

 —

 

 

9,816

 

Restricted stock awards

 

100,710

 

 

1

 

 

608

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

609

 

 

 —

 

 

609

 

Restricted stock award forfeitures

 

(19,913)

 

 

 —

 

 

(216)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(216)

 

 

 —

 

 

(216)

 

Dividends and distributions declared

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(5,604)

 

 

 —

 

 

(5,604)

 

 

(2,654)

 

 

(8,258)

 

Balance, March 31, 2016

 

31,094,560

 

$

310

 

$

113,105

 

$

(41,244)

 

$

 —

 

$

72,171

 

$

183,081

 

$

255,252

 

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3


 

Table of Contents

 

 

ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

March 31, 

 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

26,533

 

$

8,118

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation of buildings and tenant improvements

 

 

5,468

 

 

4,200

 

Amortization of leasing costs and in-place lease intangibles

 

 

2,681

 

 

708

 

Accrued straight-line rental revenue

 

 

(188)

 

 

(725)

 

Amortization of leasing incentives and above or below-market rents

 

 

6

 

 

177

 

Accrued straight-line ground rent expense

 

 

66

 

 

79

 

Bad debt expense

 

 

45

 

 

34

 

Noncash stock compensation

 

 

437

 

 

379

 

Impairment charges

 

 

35

 

 

 —

 

Noncash interest expense

 

 

191

 

 

318

 

Noncash loss on extinguishment of debt

 

 

 

 

227

 

Gain on real estate dispositions and acquisitions

 

 

(26,674)

 

 

(6,197)

 

Change in the fair value of derivatives

 

 

2,389

 

 

147

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property assets

 

 

218

 

 

(1,101)

 

Property liabilities

 

 

(686)

 

 

381

 

Construction assets

 

 

4,857

 

 

(8,551)

 

Construction liabilities

 

 

(4,070)

 

 

1,402

 

Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities

 

 

11,308

 

 

(404)

 

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Development of real estate investments

 

 

(19,777)

 

 

(20,951)

 

Tenant and building improvements

 

 

(1,309)

 

 

(1,203)

 

Acquisitions of real estate investments

 

 

(165,161)

 

 

 —

 

Dispositions of real estate investments

 

 

83,748

 

 

15,224

 

Notes receivable issuances

 

 

(2,639)

 

 

 —

 

Increase (decrease) in restricted cash

 

 

(13)

 

 

762

 

Leasing costs

 

 

(490)

 

 

(1,337)

 

Leasing incentives

 

 

(22)

 

 

(825)

 

Contributions to equity method investments

 

 

(5,440)

 

 

 —

 

Net cash used for investing activities

 

 

(111,103)

 

 

(8,330)

 

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from sales of common stock

 

 

10,089

 

 

 —

 

Offering costs

 

 

(273)

 

 

 —

 

Debt issuances, credit facility and construction loan borrowings

 

 

144,684

 

 

125,467

 

Debt and credit facility repayments, including principal amortization

 

 

(54,821)

 

 

(103,637)

 

Debt issuance costs

 

 

(442)

 

 

(1,132)

 

Dividends and distributions

 

 

(7,621)

 

 

(6,368)

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

 

91,616

 

 

14,330

 

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(8,179)

 

 

5,596

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

 

26,989

 

 

25,883

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

18,810

 

$

31,479

 

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4


 

Table of Contents

ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(Unaudited)

 

1.Business and Organization

 

Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) is a full service real estate company with extensive experience developing, building, owning and managing high-quality, institutional-grade office, retail and multifamily properties in attractive markets throughout the Mid-Atlantic United States. The Company is the sole general partner of Armada Hoffler, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”). The operations of the Company are carried on primarily through the Operating Partnership and the wholly owned subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership. Both the Company and the Operating Partnership were formed on October 12, 2012 and commenced operations upon completion of the underwritten initial public offering of shares of the Company’s common stock and certain related formation transactions on May 13, 2013.

 

As of March 31, 2016, the Company owned 100% of the interests in, and consolidated for financial reporting purposes, each of the following properties in its operating property portfolio:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property

    

Segment

    

Location

4525 Main Street

 

Office

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia*

Armada Hoffler Tower

 

Office

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia*

Commonwealth of Virginia - Chesapeake

 

Office

 

Chesapeake, Virginia

Commonwealth of Virginia - Virginia Beach

 

Office

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia

One Columbus

 

Office

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia*

Oyster Point

 

Office

 

Newport News, Virginia

Two Columbus

 

Office

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia*

249 Central Park Retail

 

Retail

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia*

Alexander Pointe

 

Retail

 

Salisbury, North Carolina**

Bermuda Crossroads

 

Retail

 

Chester, Virginia

Broad Creek Shopping Center

 

Retail

 

Norfolk, Virginia

Broadmoor Plaza

 

Retail

 

South Bend, Indiana**

Columbus Village

 

Retail

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia*

Commerce Street Retail

 

Retail

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia*

Courthouse 7-Eleven

 

Retail

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia

Dick's at Town Center

 

Retail

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia*

Dimmock Square

 

Retail

 

Colonial Heights, Virginia

Fountain Plaza Retail

 

Retail

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia*

Gainsborough Square

 

Retail

 

Chesapeake, Virginia

Greentree Shopping Center

 

Retail

 

Chesapeake, Virginia

Hanbury Village

 

Retail

 

Chesapeake, Virginia

Harper Hill Commons

 

Retail

 

Winston-Salem, North Carolina**

Harrisonburg Regal

 

Retail

 

Harrisonburg, Virginia

Kroger Junction

 

Retail

 

Pasadena, Texas**

North Hampton Market

 

Retail

 

Taylors, South Carolina**

North Point Center

 

Retail

 

Durham, North Carolina

Oakland Marketplace

 

Retail

 

Oakland, Tennessee**

Parkway Marketplace

 

Retail

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia

Patterson Place

 

Retail

 

Durham, North Carolina**

Perry Hall Marketplace

 

Retail

 

Perry Hall, Maryland

Providence Plaza

 

Retail

 

Charlotte, North Carolina

Sandbridge Commons

 

Retail

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia

Socastee Commons

 

Retail

 

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina

South Retail

 

Retail

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia*

5


 

Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

Property

    

Segment

    

Location

South Square

 

Retail

 

Durham, North Carolina**

Stone House Square

 

Retail

 

Hagerstown, Maryland

Studio 56 Retail

 

Retail

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia*

Tyre Neck Harris Teeter

 

Retail

 

Portsmouth, Virginia

Waynesboro Commons

 

Retail

 

Waynesboro, Virginia**

Wendover Village

 

Retail

 

Greensboro, North Carolina**

Willowbrook Commons

 

Retail

 

Nashville, Tennessee**

Encore Apartments

 

Multifamily

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia*

Liberty Apartments

 

Multifamily

 

Newport News, Virginia

Smith's Landing

 

Multifamily

 

Blacksburg, Virginia

The Cosmopolitan

 

Multifamily

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia*

 


 

*Located in the Town Center of Virginia Beach

** Acquired as part of eleven asset portfolio on January 14, 2016

 

 

 

As of March 31, 2016, the following properties that the Company consolidates for financial statement purposes were under development or construction:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property

    

Segment

    

Location

Lightfoot Marketplace

 

Retail

 

Williamsburg, Virginia

Johns Hopkins Village

 

Multifamily

 

Baltimore, Maryland

Brooks Crossing

 

Office/Retail

 

Newport News, Virginia

 

The Company owns a 60% controlling financial interest in Lightfoot Marketplace. Subject to the occurrence of certain events, the Company’s ownership interest in Lightfoot Marketplace may increase to 70%. The Company owns an 80% controlling financial interest in Johns Hopkins Village. The noncontrolling interest holder of Johns Hopkins Village has the right to exchange its 20% ownership interest for Class A units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership (“Class A Units”) upon and for a period of one year after the project’s completion.  The Company owns a 65% controlling interest in Brooks Crossing.

 

Please see Note 4 for the Company’s investment in Durham City Center II, LLC, which is an unconsolidated subsidiary that the Company accounts for using the equity method of accounting.

 

2.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”).

 

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the financial position and results of operations of the Company, the Operating Partnership and its wholly owned subsidiaries. Although the Company has interests in variable interest entities, it is not the primary beneficiary, with the exception of the Operating Partnership (see Note 7), as the Company does not have any elements of power in the decision making process of these entities, and therefore does not consolidate the entities. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

In the opinion of management, the condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, which are necessary for the fair presentation of the financial condition and results of operations for the interim periods presented.

6


 

Table of Contents

 

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with the requirements for interim financial information. Accordingly, these interim financial statements have not been audited and exclude certain disclosures required for annual financial statements. Also, the operating results presented for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the entire year. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed. Such estimates are based on management’s historical experience and best judgment after considering past, current and expected events and economic conditions. Actual results could differ from management’s estimates.

 

Significant Accounting Policies

 

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared on the basis of the accounting principles described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, among others.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

On May 28, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued a new standard that provides a single, comprehensive model for recognizing revenue from contracts with customers. The new standard could change the way the Company recognizes revenue from construction and development contracts with third party customers. The new standard will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. Management is currently evaluating the potential impact of the new revenue recognition standard on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. On March 17, 2016, the FASB issued guidance to clarify the principal versus agent guidance in its new revenue recognition standard.  The new guidance clarifies how an entity should identify the unit of accounting for the principal versus agent evaluation and how it should apply the control principle to certain types of arrangement, such as service transactions.  The new guidance also reframes the indicators to focus on evidence that an entity is acting as a principal rather than as an agent, revises examples in the new standard and adds new ones. The new guidance is effective for the Company on January 1, 2017.  Management is currently evaluating the potential impact of the new guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

On February 18, 2015, the FASB issued new consolidation guidance that changes: (i) the identification of variable interests, (ii) the variable interest entity (“VIE”) characteristics for a limited partnership or similar entity and (iii) primary beneficiary determination. The amended guidance also eliminates the presumption that a general partner controls a limited partnership. The Company adopted the guidance on January 1, 2016 with no material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

On February 25, 2016, the FASB issued a new lease standard that requires lessees to recognize most leases in their balance sheets as lease liabilities with corresponding right-of-use assets. The new standard also makes targeted changes to lessor accounting. The new standard will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2019 and requires a modified retrospective transition approach for all lease existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application with an option to use certain transition relief. Management is currently evaluating the potential impact of the new lease standard on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

On March 10, 2016, the FASB issued new guidance clarifying that the novation of a derivative contract in a hedge accounting relationship does not, in and of itself, require dedesignation of that hedge accounting relationship.  Hedge accounting relationships could continue as long as all of the other hedge accounting criteria are met, including the expectation that the hedge will be highly effective when the creditworthiness of the new counterparty

7


 

Table of Contents

to the derivative contract is considered. The new guidance will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2017, and may be applied prospectively, or the Company may use a modified retrospective approach. Management does not expect the adoption of the new guidance to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

 

On March 17, 2016, the FASB issued new guidance eliminating the requirement that an investor retrospectively apply equity method accounting when an investment that it had accounted for by another method initially qualifies for the equity method. The new guidance is effective for the Company on January 1, 2017.  Management is currently evaluating the potential impact of the new guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

On March 30, 2016, the FASB issued new guidance that will change the accounting for certain aspects of share-based payments to employees.  Entities will be required to recognize the income tax effects of awards in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled.  The new guidance is effective for the Company on January 1, 2017.  Management is currently evaluating the potential impact of the new guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

 

3.Segments

 

Net operating income (segment revenues minus segment expenses) is the measure used by the Company’s chief operating decision-maker to assess segment performance. Net operating income is not a measure of operating income or cash flows from operating activities as measured by GAAP and is not indicative of cash available to fund cash needs. As a result, net operating income should not be considered an alternative to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. Not all companies calculate net operating income in the same manner. The Company considers net operating income to be an appropriate supplemental measure to net income because it assists both investors and management in understanding the core operations of the Company’s real estate and construction businesses.

 

8


 

Table of Contents

Net operating income of the Company’s reportable segments for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 was as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended March 31, 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

Office real estate

 

 

    

 

 

 

Rental revenues

$

5,521

 

$

7,703

 

Rental expenses

 

1,456

 

 

1,754

 

Real estate taxes

 

539

 

 

691

 

Segment net operating income

 

3,526

 

 

5,258

 

Retail real estate

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental revenues

 

13,032

 

 

6,625

 

Rental expenses

 

2,336

 

 

1,399

 

Real estate taxes

 

1,284

 

 

566

 

Segment net operating income

 

9,412

 

 

4,660

 

Multifamily residential real estate

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental revenues

 

4,730

 

 

3,862

 

Rental expenses

 

1,537

 

 

1,607

 

Real estate taxes

 

526

 

 

400

 

Segment net operating income

 

2,667

 

 

1,855

 

General contracting and real estate services

 

 

 

 

 

 

Segment revenues

 

36,803

 

 

29,071

 

Segment expenses

 

35,037

 

 

28,142

 

Segment gross profit

 

1,766

 

 

929

 

Net operating income

$

17,371

 

$

12,702

 

 

General contracting and real estate services revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2016 exclude revenue related to intercompany construction contracts of $15.0 million. General contracting and real estate services expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2016 exclude expenses related to intercompany construction contracts of $14.8 million. General contracting and real estate services expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2016 include noncash stock compensation expense of less than $0.2 million.

 

General contracting and real estate services revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2015 exclude revenue from intercompany construction contracts of $8.5 million. General contracting and real estate services expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2015 exclude expenses for intercompany construction contracts of $8.4 million. General contracting and real estate services expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2015 include noncash stock compensation expense of less than $0.1 million.

 

9


 

Table of Contents

The following table reconciles net operating income to net income for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended March 31, 

 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

Net operating income

    

$

17,371

    

$

12,702

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

(8,149)

 

 

(4,908)

 

General and administrative expenses

 

 

(2,484)

 

 

(2,328)

 

Acquisition, development and other pursuit costs

 

 

(704)

 

 

(171)

 

Impairment charges

 

 

(35)

 

 

 —

 

Interest income

 

 

182

 

 

 —

 

Interest expense

 

 

(3,791)

 

 

(3,046)

 

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 

 

 

 

(227)

 

Gain on real estate dispositions and acquisitions

 

 

26,674

 

 

6,197

 

Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives

 

 

(2,389)

 

 

(147)

 

Other (expense) income

 

 

76

 

 

15

 

Income tax benefit (provision)

 

 

(218)

 

 

31

 

Net income

 

$

26,533

 

$

8,118

 

 

General and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2016 include noncash stock compensation expense of $0.3 million. General and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2015 include noncash stock compensation expense of $0.3 million.

 

4.Real Estate Investments

 

Operating Property Acquisitions

 

In connection with operating property acquisitions, the Company identifies and recognizes all assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The purchase price allocations to tangible assets, such as land, site improvements, and buildings and improvements, are presented within income producing property in the condensed consolidated balance sheet and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Acquired lease intangibles are presented within other assets and liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheet and amortized over their respective lease terms. The Company expenses all costs incurred related to operating property acquisitions. The Company values land based on a market approach, looking to recent sales of similar properties, adjusting for differences due to location and the state of entitlement as well as the shape and size of the parcel. Improvements to land are valued using a replacement cost approach, which applies industry standard replacement costs adjusted for geographic specific considerations and reduced by estimated depreciation. The value of buildings acquired is estimated using the replacement cost approach, assuming the buildings were vacant at acquisition. The replacement cost approach considers the composition of the structures acquired, adjusted for an estimate of depreciation. The estimate of depreciation is made considering industry standard information and depreciation curves for the identified asset classes. The value of acquired lease intangibles considers the estimated cost of leasing the properties as if the acquired buildings were vacant, as well as the value of the current leases relative to market-rate leases. The in-place lease value is determined using an estimated total lease-up time and lost rental revenues during such time. The value of current leases relative to market-rate leases is based on market rents obtained for comparable assets in the applicable markets. Given the significance of unobservable inputs used in the valuation of acquired real estate assets, the Company classifies them as Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy.

 

On January 14, 2016, the Company completed the acquisition of an eleven asset retail portfolio totaling 1.1 million square feet for a gross purchase price of $170.5 million, less normal closing adjustments.

 

10


 

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the acquisition date preliminary fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed during the three months ended March 31, 2016 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land

    

$

63,739

 

Site improvements

 

 

3,828

 

Building and improvements

 

 

86,067

 

In-place leases

 

 

20,850

 

Above-market leases

 

 

1,980

 

Below-market leases

 

 

(5,964)

 

Net assets acquired

 

$

170,500

 

 

The following table summarizes the consolidated results of operations of the Company on a pro forma basis, as if the retail portfolio acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2015 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

March 31, 

 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

Rental revenues

    

$

23,814

    

$

22,805

 

Net income

 

 

575

 

 

2,091

 

 

The pro forma financial information is presented for informational purposes only and is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the acquisition had taken place on January 1, 2015. The pro forma financial information includes adjustments to rental revenues for above and below-market leases and adjustments to depreciation and amortization expense for acquired property and in-place lease assets.

 

Rental revenues and net income from the acquired properties for the period from the respective acquisition date to March 31, 2016 included in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income was $3.6 million and $0.4 million, respectively.

 

Subsequent to March 31, 2016

 

On April 29, 2016, the Company completed the acquisition of Southgate Square, located in Colonial Heights, Virginia, for aggregate consideration of $38.6 million, comprised the assumption of $21.1 million in debt and 1,575,185 Class A Units. The Company has not yet completed its purchase price allocation of Southgate Square.

 

Investment in Unconsolidated Entities

 

On Feburary 25, 2016, the Company acquired a 37% interest in Durham City Center II, LLC (“City Center”) for purposes of developing a 22-story mixed use tower in Durham, North Carolina.  As of March 31, 2016, the Company has invested $6.9 million in City Center. The Company has agreed to guarantee 37% of the construction loan for City Center, however the loan is collateralized by 100% of the assets of City Center.  As of March 31, 2016, the construction loan has not been drawn against. In the event that the Company’s joint venture partner does not contribute its required equity, the Company has committed to providing $4.0 million to eliminate any shortfall.

 

As of March 31, 2016, the difference between the carrying value of the Company’s initial investment in City Center and the amount of underlying equity was immaterial. For the three months ended March 31, 2016, City Center did not have any operating activity, and therefore we did not receive any dividends or allocated income. 

 

Based on the terms of City Center’s operating agreement, the Company does not have the power to direct the activities of the project that most significantly impact its performance.  Therefore, the Company is not the project’s primary beneficiary.

 

11


 

Table of Contents

The Company holds a note receivable for the Point Street Apartments project, which was entered into in October 2015.  The Company has agreed to fund up to $23.0 million for this project. The balance of the note receivable was $10.4 and $7.8 million as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company recognized $0.2 million of interest income on the note.  No portion of the note receivable balance is past due and the Company has not recorded an impairment balance on the note. 

 

Real Estate Dispositions

 

On November 2, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Richmond Tower office building for $78.0 million. The Company completed the disposition on January 8, 2016.  Net proceeds after transaction costs were $77.0 million. The gain on the disposition of Richmond Tower was $26.2 million.

 

On January 7, 2016, the Company completed the sale of a building constructed for the Economic Development Authority of Newport News, Virginia.  Net proceeds after transaction costs were $6.6 million.  The gain on the disposition was $0.4 million.

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company placed the Oyster Point office property in real estate investments held for sale. 

 

 

 

Subsequent to March 31, 2016

 

On April 19, 2016, the Company agreed to the future sale of the Willowbrook Commons property located in Nashville, Tennessee for $9.3 million.  The closing of the sale is subject to customary closing conditions, including completion of the buyer’s due diligence.

 

On April 29, 2016, the Company agreed to the future sale of the Oakland Marketplace property located in Oakland, Tennessee for $5.4 million.  The closing of the sale is subject to customary closing conditions, including completion of the buyer’s due diligence.

 

On April 29, 2016, the Company agreed to the future sale of the Broadmoor Plaza property located in Nashville, Tennessee for $13.6 million.  The closing of the sale is subject to customary closing conditions, including completion of the buyer’s due diligence.

 

Annapolis Junction Town Center

 

On April 21, 2016, the Company invested $42.0 million in the Annapolis Junction Town Center project in Annapolis Junction, Maryland (“Annapolis Junction”). Annapolis Junction is an estimated $102.0 million mixed-use development project with plans for 416 residential units, 17,000 square feet of retail space and a 150-room hotel. Annapolis Junction Apartments Owner, LLC (“AJAO”) is the developer of the project and has engaged the Company to serve as construction general contractor. Annapolis Junction is scheduled to open in 2018; however, management can provide no assurances that Annapolis Junction will open on the anticipated timeline.

 

AJAO is responsible for securing a senior construction loan of up to $60.0 million to fund the development and construction of Annapolis Junction. The Company has agreed to guarantee up to $25.0 million of the senior construction loan in exchange for the option to purchase up to an 88% controlling interest in Annapolis Junction upon completion of the project as follows: (i) an option to purchase a 80% indirect interest in Annapolis Junction for the lesser of the seller’s budgeted or actual cost, exercisable within one year from the project’s completion (the “First Option”) and (ii) provided that the Company has exercised the First Option, an option to purchase an additional 8% indirect interest in Annapolis Junction for the lesser of the seller’s actual or budgeted cost, exercisable within 27 months from the project’s completion (the “Second Option”).

 

The Company’s investment in the Annapolis Junction project is in the form of a loan under which AJAO may borrow up to $42.0 million (the “AJAO loan”). Interest on the AJAO loan accrues at 10.0% per annum and matures on the earlier of: (i) December 21, 2020, which may be extended by AJAO under two one-year extension options, (ii) the

12


 

Table of Contents

maturity date or earlier termination of the senior construction loan or (iii) the date the Company exercises the Second Option as described further below.

In the event that the Company exercises the First Option, AJAO is required to simultaneously pay down the senior construction loan and the AJAO loan by 80%, at which time the interest rate on the AJAO loan will automatically be reduced to the interest rate on the senior construction loan. In the event the Company exercises the Second Option, AJAO is required to simultaneously repay any remaining amounts outstanding under the AJAO loan, with any excess proceeds received from the exercise of the Second Option applied against the remaining balance of the senior construction loan. In the event that the Company does not exercise either the First Option or the Second Option, the interest rate on the AJAO loan will automatically be reduced to the interest rate on the senior construction loan for the remaining term of the AJAO loan.

 

 

 

 

5.Indebtedness

 

Credit Facility

 

On February 20, 2015, the Operating Partnership, as borrower, and the Company, as parent guarantor, entered into a new $200.0 million senior unsecured credit facility that includes a $150.0 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility and a $50.0 million senior unsecured term loan facility. The new credit facility replaced the prior $155.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility that was scheduled to mature on May 13, 2016. On February 20, 2015, the Operating Partnership borrowed $54.0 million under the revolving credit facility and $50.0 million under the term loan facility to repay in full all outstanding amounts due under the prior credit facility and to repay approximately $39.0 million of other indebtedness secured by the following properties in the Company’s portfolio: (i) Broad Creek Shopping Center, (ii) Commerce Street Retail, (iii) Dick’s at Town Center, (iv) Hanbury Village, (v) Studio 56 Retail and (vi) Tyre Neck Harris Teeter. The Company recognized a $0.2 million loss on extinguishment of debt representing the unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the $39.0 million of other indebtedness repaid on February 20, 2015. During the first quarter of 2016, the total capacity was increased to $250.0 million, pursuant to the accordion feature of the credit facility.

 

Depending on the Operating Partnership’s total leverage, the revolving credit facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.40% to 2.00% and the term loan facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.35% to 1.95%. As of March 31, 2016, the interest rates on the revolving credit facility and the term loan facility were 1.99% and 1.94%, respectively. The revolving credit facility has a scheduled maturity date of February 20, 2019, with a one-year extension option, subject to certain conditions, and the term loan facility has a scheduled maturity date of February 20, 2020. The Operating Partnership may, at any time, voluntarily prepay any loan under the new credit facility in whole or in part without premium or penalty.

 

On February 25, 2016, the Company amended the credit facility to, among other things, allow the maximum leverage ratio of the Company to be increased to 65% for the two consecutive quarters following any acquisition that is equal to or greater than 10% of the Company’s total asset value (as defined in the credit agreement), but only up to two times during the term of the credit facility.

 

During the first quarter of 2016, the Company increased the borrowings under the senior unsecured term loan facility to $100.0 million.

 

As of March 31, 2016, the outstanding balances on the revolving credit facility and the term loan facility were $101.0 million and $100.0 million, respectively.

 

Other Financing Activity

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company borrowed $13.7 million under its construction loans to fund new development and construction.

13


 

Table of Contents

  Subsequent to March 31, 2016

On April 20, 2016, the Company increased its borrowings on the revolving credit facility by $26.0 million.

 

 

 

 

6. Derivative Financial Instruments

 

The Company may enter into interest rate derivative contracts to manage exposure to interest rate risks. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Derivative financial instruments are recognized at fair value and presented within other assets and liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Gains and losses resulting from changes in the fair value of derivatives that are neither designated nor qualify as hedging instruments are recognized within the change in fair value of interest rate derivatives in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income. For derivatives that qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss is reported as a component of other comprehensive loss and reclassified into earnings in the periods during which the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings.

 

On February 25, 2016, the Operating Partnership entered into a LIBOR interest rate cap agreement on a notional amount of $75.0 million at a strike rate of 1.50% for a premium of less than $0.1 million.  The interest rate cap agreement expires on March 1, 2018.

 

The Company’s derivatives were comprised of the following as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31, 2016

 

December 31, 2015

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notional

 

 

 

 

 

Notional

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

Fair Value

 

Amount

 

Fair Value

 

 

    

 

    

Asset

    

Liability

    

 

    

Asset

    

Liability

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps

 

$

57,047

 

$

 —

 

$

(2,250)

 

$

57,093

 

$

 —

 

$

(1,082)

 

Interest rate caps

 

 

218,500

 

 

75

 

 

 

 

246,546

 

 

164

 

 

 

Total

 

$

275,547

 

$

75

 

$

(2,250)

 

$

303,639

 

$

164

 

$

(1,082)

 

 

The changes in the fair value of the Company’s derivatives during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 were comprised of the following (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

March 31, 

 

    

2016

    

2015

 

 

(Unaudited)

Interest rate swaps

 

$

(2,244)

 

$

(787)

Interest rate caps

 

 

(145)

 

 

(146)

Total

 

$

(2,389)

 

$

(933)

Comprehensive income statement presentation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives

 

$

(2,389)

 

$

(147)

Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedge

 

 

 —

 

 

(786)

Total

 

$

(2,389)

 

$

(933)

 

Effective March 31, 2016, the Company determined that the short-cut method of hedge accounting was not appropriate for two of its interest-rate swaps and, for accounting purposes, the hedge relationship was terminated. The swaps were entered into in February and July 2015. Accordingly, changes in fair value of the swap should have been recorded in income rather than other comprehensive income. The Company determined that the errors were immaterial

14


 

Table of Contents

to all previously issued financial statements. The Company recognized $0.7 million of accumulated other comprehensive income and $0.4 million, which was previously allocated to noncontrolling interest as of December 31, 2015, in earnings during the first quarter of 2016. Subsequent changes in the value of the interest rate swap for the period January 1, 2016 to March 31, 2016 were also recognized in earnings during the first quarter of 2016. Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2015 was overstated by $0.8 million. In reaching its conclusions, management considered the nature of the error, the effect of the error on operating results for 2015, and the effects of the error on important financial statement measures, including related trends.   

 

7.Equity

 

Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

On May 5, 2015, the Company commenced an at-the-market continuous equity offering program (the “ATM Program”) through which the Company may, from time to time, issue and sell shares of its common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $50.0 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company issued and sold an aggregate of 937,404 shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $10.76 per share. Net proceeds to the Company after offering costs and commissions were $9.8 million.

 

As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company’s authorized capital was 500 million shares of common stock and 100 million shares of preferred stock. The Company had 31.1 million and 30.1 million shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. No shares of preferred stock were issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2016 or December 31, 2015.

 

Noncontrolling Interests

 

As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company held a 66.4% and 65.6% interest in the Operating Partnership, respectively. The Company is the primary beneficiary of the Operating Partnership as it has the power to direct the activities of the Operating Partnership and the rights to absorb 66.4% of the net income of the Operating Partnership. As the primary beneficiary, the Company consolidates the financial position and results of operations of the Operating Partnership. Noncontrolling interests in the Company represent units of limited partnership interest not held by the Company.

 

As of March 31, 2016, there were 14,751,986 Class A Units not held by the Company.

 

As partial consideration for Columbus Village, the Operating Partnership issued 1,000,000 Class B Units on July 10, 2015 and agreed to issue 275,000 Class C Units on January 10, 2017. Subject to the occurrence of certain events, the Class B Units and Class C Units will not earn or accrue distributions until July 10, 2017 and January 10, 2018, respectively, at which time each automatically will convert to Class A Units.

 

Common Stock Dividends and Class A Unit Distributions

 

On January 7, 2016, the Company paid cash dividends of $5.1 million to common stockholders and the Operating Partnership paid cash distributions of $2.5 million to holders of Class A Units.

 

On January 31, 2016, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.18 per share payable on April 7, 2016 to stockholders of record on March 30, 2016.

 

Subsequent to March 31, 2016

On April 7, 2016, the Company paid cash dividends of $5.6 million to common stockholders and the Operating Partnership paid cash distributions of $2.7 million to holders of Class A Units.

15


 

Table of Contents

From April 1, 2016 to April 14, 2016, the Company issued and sold an aggregate of 215,515 shares of common stock under the ATM Program at a weighted average price of $11.35 per share. Net proceeds to the Company after offering costs and commissions were $2.4 million.

On May 2, 2016, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.18 per share payable on July 7, 2016 to stockholders of record on June 29, 2016.

 

8.Stock-Based Compensation

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company granted an aggregate of 100,710 shares of restricted stock to employees and non-employee directors with a weighted average grant date fair value of $10.84 per share. Employee restricted stock awards generally vest over a period of two years: one-third immediately on the grant date and the remaining two-thirds in equal amounts on the first two anniversaries following the grant date, subject to continued service to the Company. Non-employee director restricted stock awards vest either immediately upon grant or over a period of one year, subject to continued service to the Company.

 

On January 1, 2016, the Company established its Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) and entered into agreements with certain of its employees to issue performance-based awards in the form of restricted stock units.  The performance period for these agreements is three years, with a required two-year service period immediately following the performance period. The compensation expense and the effect on the Company’s weighted average diluted shares calculation were immaterial.

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company recognized $0.6 million of stock-based compensation expense. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company recognized $0.6 million of stock-based compensation expense. As of March 31, 2016, there were 111,673 nonvested restricted shares outstanding; the total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested restricted shares was $0.8 million, which the Company expects to recognize over the next 24 months.

 

 

 

9. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

Fair value measurements are based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. The hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value is as follows:

 

Level 1—quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

 

Level 2—observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities

 

Level 3—unobservable inputs

 

Except as disclosed below, the carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments approximate their fair value. Financial assets and liabilities whose fair values are measured on a recurring basis using Level 2 inputs consist of interest rate swaps and caps. The Company measures the fair values of these assets and liabilities based on prices provided by independent market participants that are based on observable inputs using market-based valuation techniques.

 

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. For disclosure purposes, the level within which the fair value measurement is categorized is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

 

The fair value of the Company’s long term debt is sensitive to fluctuations in interest rates. Discounted cash flow analysis based on Level 2 inputs is generally used to estimate the fair value of the Company’s long term debt.

16


 

Table of Contents

 

Considerable judgment is used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments. The estimates of fair value presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized upon disposition of the financial instruments.

 

The carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments, all of which are based on Level 2 inputs, as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31, 2016

 

December 31, 2015

 

 

 

Carrying

 

Fair

 

Carrying

 

Fair

 

 

    

Value

    

Value

    

Value

    

Value

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Indebtedness

 

$

467,311

 

$

454,722

 

$

377,593

 

$

384,691

 

Interest rate swap liabilities

 

 

2,250

 

 

2,250

 

 

1,082

 

 

1,082

 

Interest rate cap assets

 

 

75

 

 

75

 

 

164

 

 

164

 

 

 

 

10.Related Party Transactions

 

The Company provides general contracting and real estate services to certain related party entities that are not included in these condensed consolidated financial statements. Revenue from construction contracts with related party entities of the Company was $6.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016. Gross profit from such contracts was less than $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016. Revenue from construction contracts with related party entities of the Company was $1.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015. Gross profit from such contracts was less than $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015. Real estate services fees from affiliated entities of the Company were not significant for either the three months ended March 31, 2016 or 2015. In addition, affiliated entities also reimburse the Company for monthly maintenance and facilities management services provided to the properties. Cost reimbursements earned by the Company from affiliated entities were not significant for either the three months ended March 31, 2016 or 2015. 

 

The Operating Partnership entered into tax protection agreements that indemnify certain directors and executive officers of the Company from their tax liabilities resulting from the potential future sale of certain of the Company’s properties within seven (or, in a limited number of cases, ten) years of the completion of the Company’s initial public offering and formation transactions completed on May 13, 2013. In addition, the tax protection agreements provide that the Operating Partnership will offer certain of the original contributors, including certain of the Company’s directors and executive officers, the opportunity to guarantee debt, or, alternatively, to enter into a deficit restoration obligation, for ten years from the closing of the Company’s initial public offering in a manner intended to provide an allocation of Operating Partnership liabilities to the partner for federal income tax purposes. Pursuant to these tax protection agreements, certain of the Company’s executive officers have guaranteed $0.3 million of the Operating Partnership’s outstanding debt as of March 31, 2016.

In addition, the loan for the City Center joint venture is underwritten by a syndicate which includes Park Sterling Bank.  The Chief Executive Officer of Park Sterling Bank is the Chairman of the Company’s Audit Committee.

 

 

 

11. Commitments and Contingencies

 

Legal Proceedings

 

The Company is from time to time involved in various disputes, lawsuits, warranty claims, environmental and other matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Management makes assumptions and estimates concerning the likelihood and amount of any potential loss relating to these matters.

 

The Company currently is a party to various legal proceedings, none of which management expects will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity. Management

17


 

Table of Contents

accrues a liability for litigation if an unfavorable outcome is determined to be probable and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. If an unfavorable outcome is determined to be probable and a range of loss can be reasonably estimated, management accrues the best estimate within the range; however, if no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other, the minimum amount within the range is accrued. Legal fees related to litigation are expensed as incurred. Management does not believe that the ultimate outcome of these matters, either individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations; however, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties.

 

Under the Company’s leases, tenants are typically obligated to indemnify the Company from and against all liabilities, costs and expenses imposed upon or asserted against it as owner of the properties due to certain matters relating to the operation of the properties by the tenant.

 

Commitments

 

The Company has a bonding line of credit for its general contracting construction business and is contingently liable under performance and payment bonds, bonds for cancellation of mechanics liens and defect bonds. Such bonds collectively totaled $183.1 million and $183.0 million as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

 

The Operating Partnership has entered into standby letters of credit using the available capacity under the credit facility. The letters of credit relate to the guarantee of future performance on certain of the Company’s construction contracts. Letters of credit generally are available for draw down in the event the Company does not perform. As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Operating Partnership had total outstanding letters of credit of $8.0 million and $8.0 million, respectively.

 

Subsequent to March 31, 2016

 

In April 2016, the total outstanding letters of credit were reduced to $2.0 million.

18


 

Table of Contents

 

 

Review Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

Board of Directors and Stockholders of

 

Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.

 

We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. as of March 31, 2016, and the related condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income and cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, and the condensed consolidated statement of equity for the three-month period ended March 31, 2016. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

 

We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

 

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

 

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. as of December 31, 2015, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein) and we expressed an unqualified audit opinion on those consolidated financial statements in our report dated March 2, 2016. In our opinion, the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

 

Richmond, Virginia

 

May 4, 2016

19


 

Table of Contents

 

 

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

References to “we,” “our,” “us,” and “our company” refer to Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation, together with our consolidated subsidiaries, including Armada Hoffler, L.P., a Virginia limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), of which we are the sole general partner. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report.

 

Forward-Looking Statements

 

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. We caution investors that any forward-looking statements presented in this report, or which management may make orally or in writing from time to time, are based on beliefs and assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management. When used, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “estimate,” “project,” “should,” “will,” “result” and similar expressions, which do not relate solely to historical matters, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions and are not guarantees of future performance, which may be affected by known and unknown risks, trends, uncertainties and factors that are beyond our control. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected. We caution you that while forward-looking statements reflect our good faith beliefs when we make them, they are not guarantees of future performance and are impacted by actual events when they occur after we make such statements. We expressly disclaim any responsibility to update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. Accordingly, investors should use caution in relying on past forward-looking statements, which are based on results and trends at the time they are made, to anticipate future results or trends.

 

Forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties and you should not rely on them as predictions of future events. Forward-looking statements depend on assumptions, data or methods which may be incorrect or imprecise and we may not be able to realize them. We do not guarantee that the transactions and events described will happen as described (or that they will happen at all). The following factors, among others, could cause actual results and future events to differ materially from those set forth or contemplated in the forward-looking statements:

 

·

adverse economic or real estate developments, either nationally or in the markets in which our properties are located;

 

·

our failure to develop the properties in our development pipeline successfully, on the anticipated timeline or at the anticipated costs;

 

·

our failure to generate sufficient cash flows to service our outstanding indebtedness;

 

·

defaults on, early terminations of or non-renewal of leases by tenants, including significant tenants;

 

·

bankruptcy or insolvency of a significant tenant or a substantial number of smaller tenants;

 

·

difficulties in identifying or completing development, acquisition or disposition opportunities;

 

·

our failure to successfully operate developed and acquired properties;

 

·

our failure to generate income in our general contracting and real estate services segment in amounts that we anticipate;

 

·

fluctuations in interest rates and increased operating costs;

 

20


 

Table of Contents

·

our failure to obtain necessary outside financing on favorable terms or at all;

 

·

our inability to extend the maturity of or refinance existing debt or comply with the financial covenants in the agreements that govern our existing debt;

 

·

financial market fluctuations;

 

·

risks that affect the general retail environment or the market for office properties or multifamily units;

 

·

the competitive environment in which we operate;

 

·

decreased rental rates or increased vacancy rates;

 

·

conflicts of interests with our officers and directors;

 

·

lack or insufficient amounts of insurance;

 

·

environmental uncertainties and risks related to adverse weather conditions and natural disasters;

 

·

other factors affecting the real estate industry generally;

 

·

our failure to maintain our qualification as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes;

 

 

 

·

limitations imposed on our business and our ability to satisfy complex rules in order for us to maintain our qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes; and

 

·

changes in governmental regulations or interpretations thereof, such as real estate and zoning laws and increases in real property tax rates and taxation of REITs.

 

While forward-looking statements reflect our good faith beliefs, they are not guarantees of future performance. We disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement to reflect changes in underlying assumptions or factors, of new information, data or methods, future events or other changes after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, except as required by applicable law. We caution investors not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements and urge investors to carefully review the disclosures we make concerning risks and uncertainties in the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as risks, uncertainties and other factors discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and identified in other documents that we file from time to time with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

 

Business Description

 

We are a full-service real estate company with extensive experience developing, building, owning and managing high-quality, institutional-grade office, retail and multifamily properties in attractive markets throughout the Mid-

21


 

Table of Contents

Atlantic United States. As of March 31, 2016, we owned 100% of the interests in, and consolidate for financial reporting purposes, each of the following properties in our operating property portfolio:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property

    

Segment

    

Location

4525 Main Street

 

Office

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia*

Armada Hoffler Tower

 

Office

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia*

Commonwealth of Virginia - Chesapeake

 

Office

 

Chesapeake, Virginia

Commonwealth of Virginia - Virginia Beach

 

Office

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia

One Columbus

 

Office

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia*

Oyster Point

 

Office

 

Newport News, Virginia

Two Columbus

 

Office

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia*

249 Central Park Retail

 

Retail

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia*

Alexander Pointe

 

Retail

 

Salisbury, North Carolina**

Bermuda Crossroads

 

Retail

 

Chester, Virginia

Broad Creek Shopping Center

 

Retail

 

Norfolk, Virginia

Broadmoor Plaza

 

Retail

 

South Bend, Indiana**

Columbus Village

 

Retail

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia*

Commerce Street Retail

 

Retail

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia*

Courthouse 7-Eleven

 

Retail

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia

Dick's at Town Center

 

Retail

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia*

Dimmock Square

 

Retail

 

Colonial Heights, Virginia

Fountain Plaza Retail

 

Retail

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia*

Gainsborough Square

 

Retail

 

Chesapeake, Virginia

Greentree Shopping Center

 

Retail

 

Chesapeake, Virginia

Hanbury Village

 

Retail

 

Chesapeake, Virginia

Harper Hill Commons

 

Retail

 

Winston-Salem, North Carolina**

Harrisonburg Regal

 

Retail

 

Harrisonburg, Virginia

Kroger Junction

 

Retail

 

Pasadena, Texas**

North Hampton Market

 

Retail

 

Taylors, South Carolina**

North Point Center

 

Retail

 

Durham, North Carolina

Oakland Marketplace

 

Retail

 

Oakland, Tennessee**

Parkway Marketplace

 

Retail

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia

Patterson Place

 

Retail

 

Durham, North Carolina**

Perry Hall Marketplace

 

Retail

 

Perry Hall, Maryland

Providence Plaza

 

Retail

 

Charlotte, North Carolina

Sandbridge Commons

 

Retail

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia

Socastee Commons

 

Retail

 

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina

South Retail

 

Retail

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia*

South Square

 

Retail

 

Durham, North Carolina**

Stone House Square

 

Retail

 

Hagerstown, Maryland

Studio 56 Retail

 

Retail

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia*

Tyre Neck Harris Teeter

 

Retail

 

Portsmouth, Virginia

Waynesboro Commons

 

Retail

 

Waynesboro, Virginia**

Wendover Village

 

Retail

 

Greensboro, North Carolina**

Willowbrook Commons

 

Retail

 

Nashville, Tennessee**

Encore Apartments

 

Multifamily

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia*

Liberty Apartments

 

Multifamily

 

Newport News, Virginia

Smith's Landing

 

Multifamily

 

Blacksburg, Virginia

The Cosmopolitan

 

Multifamily

 

Virginia Beach, Virginia*

 


*Located in the Town Center of Virginia Beach

** Acquired as part of eleven asset portfolio on January 14, 2016

 

 

22


 

Table of Contents

As of March 31, 2016, the following properties that we consolidate for financial reporting purposes were either under development or construction:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property

    

Segment

    

Location

Lightfoot Marketplace

 

Retail

 

Williamsburg, Virginia

Johns Hopkins Village

 

Multifamily

 

Baltimore, Maryland

Brooks Crossing

 

Office/Retail

 

Newport News, Virginia

 

We own a 60% controlling financial interest in Lightfoot Marketplace. Subject to the occurrence of certain events, our ownership interest in Lightfoot Marketplace may increase to 70%. We own an 80% controlling financial interest in Johns Hopkins Village. The noncontrolling interest holder of Johns Hopkins Village has the right to exchange its 20% ownership interest for Class A units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership upon and for a period of one year after the project’s completion. We own a 65% controlling financial interest in Brooks Crossing.

 

Please see Note 4 for our investment in Durham City Center II, LLC, which is an unconsolidated subsidiary that we account for under the equity method of accounting.

 

Acquisitions and Dispositions

 

On November 2, 2015, we entered into an agreement to sell the Richmond Tower office building for $78.0 million. We completed the disposition on January 8, 2016.  Net proceeds after transaction costs were $77.0 million. The gain on the disposition of Richmond Tower was $26.2 million.

 

On January 7, 2016, we completed the sale of a building constructed for the Economic Development Authority of Newport News, Virginia.  Net proceeds after transaction costs were $6.6 million.  The gain on the disposition was $0.4 million.

 

 

First Quarter 2016 Highlights

 

The following highlights our results of operations and significant transactions for the three months ended March 31, 2016:

 

·

Net income of $26.5 million, or $0.57 per diluted share, compared to $8.1 million, or $0.20 per diluted share, for the three months ended March 31, 2015.

 

·

Normalized funds from operations (“FFO”) of $11.6 million, or $0.25 per diluted share, compared to $7.4 million, or $0.19 per diluted share, for the three months ended March 31, 2015. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

 

·

FFO of $8.4 million, or $0.18 per diluted share, compared to $6.8 million, or $0.17 per diluted share, for the three months ended March 31, 2015. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

 

 

 

·

Property segment net operating income (“NOI”) of $15.6 million compared to $11.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015:

 

·

Office NOI of $3.5 million compared to $5.3 million

 

·

Retail NOI of $9.4 million compared to $4.7 million

 

·

Multifamily NOI of $2.7 million compared to $1.9 million

 

·

Same store NOI of $9.1 million compared to $9.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015:

 

·

Office same store NOI of $2.7 million compared to $2.7 million

23


 

Table of Contents

 

·

Retail same store NOI of $4.7 million compared to $4.6 million

 

·

Multifamily same store NOI of $1.7 million compared to $1.7 million

 

·

Completed the acquisition of an eleven property retail portfolio for $170.5 million

 

·

General contracting and real estate services segment gross profit of $1.8 million compared to $0.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015.

 

·

Third party construction backlog of $176.2 million as of March 31, 2016.

 

·

Raised $10.1 million of gross proceeds at a weighted average price of $10.76 per share under our at-the-market continuous equity offering program. Net proceeds totaled $9.8 million.

 

·

Declared cash dividends of $0.18 per share.

 

 

Segment Results of Operations

 

As of March 31, 2016, we operated our business in four segments: (i) office real estate, (ii) retail real estate, (iii) multifamily residential real estate and (iv) general contracting and real estate services, which are conducted through our taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS”). Net operating income (segment revenues minus segment expenses) or “NOI” is the measure used by management to assess segment performance and allocate our resources among our segments. NOI is not a measure of operating income or cash flows from operating activities as measured by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and is not indicative of cash available to fund cash needs. As a result, NOI should not be considered an alternative to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. Not all companies calculate NOI in the same manner. We consider NOI to be an appropriate supplemental measure to net income because it assists both investors and management in understanding the core operations of our real estate and construction businesses. See Note 3 to our condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a reconciliation of NOI to net income.

 

We define same store properties as those properties that we owned and operated and that were stabilized for the entirety of both periods presented. Same store properties exclude those that were in lease-up during either of the periods presented. We generally consider a property to be in lease-up until the earlier of: (i) the quarter after the property reaches 80% occupancy or (ii) the thirteenth quarter after the property receives its certificate of occupancy.

 

 

 

Office Segment Data

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

Change

 

 

 

($ in thousands)

 

 

 

 

Rental revenues

    

$

5,521

    

$

7,703

    

$

(2,182)

 

Property expense

 

 

1,995

 

 

2,445

 

 

(450)

 

Segment NOI

 

$

3,526

 

$

5,258

 

$

(1,732)

 

 

Office segment NOI for the three months ended March 31, 2016 decreased $1.7 million compared to the corresponding period in 2015. This decrease is due to the sales of the Sentara Williamsburg, Richmond Tower and Oceaneering office buildings, which contributed $1.9 million in office segment NOI for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The $1.9 million in office segment NOI consists of $2.3 million in rental revenues, partially offset by $0.4 million in property expenses. We completed the sale of the Sentara Williamsburg office building in the first quarter of 2015, and the sale of the Richmond Tower office building in the first quarter of 2016.

 

24


 

Table of Contents

Office Same Store Results

 

Office same store results exclude new real estate development – 4525 Main Street, and the administrative building for the Commonwealth of Virginia in Virginia Beach as well as the Sentara Williamsburg and Richmond Tower office buildings, which we sold in the first quarter of 2015 and the first quarter of 2016, respectively.

 

Office same store rental revenues, property expenses and NOI for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

Change

 

 

 

($ in thousands)

 

 

 

 

Rental revenues

    

$

4,262

    

$

4,315

    

$

(53)

    

Property expenses

 

 

1,526

 

 

1,637

 

 

(111)

 

Same Store NOI

 

$

2,736

 

$

2,678

 

$

58

 

Non-Same Store NOI

 

 

790

 

 

2,580

 

 

(1,790)

 

Segment NOI

 

$

3,526

 

$

5,258

 

$

(1,732)

 

 

Office same store NOI for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased 2% compared to the corresponding period in 2015 as a result of lower use of utilities resulting from the milder winter in 2016 as compared to 2015.  These savings on utilities were offset by lower occupancy at the office properties in the Town Center of Virginia Beach – specifically One Columbus and Two Columbus.

 

 

 

Retail Segment Data

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

 

 

March 31, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

Change

 

 

 

($ in thousands)

 

 

 

 

Rental revenues

    

$

13,032

    

$

6,625

    

$

6,407

 

Property expenses

 

 

3,620

 

 

1,965

 

 

1,655

 

Segment NOI

 

$

9,412

 

$

4,660

 

$

4,752

 

 

Retail segment NOI for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased $4.8 million compared to the corresponding period in 2015. Acquisitions and new real estate development contributed $4.7 million of NOI during the three months ended March 31, 2016. Same store NOI growth accounted for the balance of the increase.

 

During the first quarter of 2015, we delivered Sandbridge Commons in Virginia Beach, Virginia. During the second quarter of 2015, we acquired Stone House Square in Hagerstown, Maryland and Perry Hall Marketplace in Perry Hall, Maryland. During the third quarter of 2015, we acquired Socastee Commons in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, Columbus Village in Virginia Beach, Virginia and Providence Plaza in Charlotte, North Carolina. During the first quarter of 2016, we acquired the eleven property retail portfolio.

 

Retail Same Store Results

 

Retail same store results exclude new real estate development – Sandbridge Commons – as well as new property acquisitions – Stone House Square, Perry Hall Marketplace, Socastee Commons, Columbus Village, Providence Plaza and the eleven property retail portfolio.

 

25


 

Table of Contents

 

 

Retail same store rental revenues, property expenses and NOI for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

 

March 31, 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

Change

 

 

($ in thousands)

 

 

 

Rental revenues

    

$

6,608

    

$

6,506

    

$

102

Property expenses

 

 

1,946

 

 

1,941

 

 

5

Same Store NOI

 

$

4,662

 

$

4,565

 

$

97

Non-Same Store NOI

 

 

4,750

 

 

95

 

 

4,655

Segment NOI

 

$

9,412

 

$

4,660

 

$

4,752

 

Retail same store NOI for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased 2% compared to the corresponding period in 2015 as a result of higher occupancy at retail properties in the Town Center of Virginia Beach, particularly South Retail and the redeveloped ground floor space at Dick’s at Town Center.

 

 

 

Multifamily Segment Data

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

 

March 31, 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

Change

 

 

($ in thousands)

 

 

 

Rental revenues

    

$

4,730

    

$

3,862

    

$

868

Property expenses

 

 

2,063

 

 

2,007

 

 

56

Segment NOI

 

$

2,667

 

$

1,855

 

$

812

 

Multifamily segment NOI for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased $0.8 million compared to the corresponding period in 2015, primarily as a result of the stabilization of Encore Apartments and Liberty Apartments as well as improved leasing at The Cosmopolitan. Liberty Apartments stabilized in the third quarter of 2015.

 

Multifamily Same Store Results

 

Multifamily same store results exclude new real estate development – Encore Apartments and Whetstone Apartments – as well as Liberty Apartments, which was acquired during the first quarter of 2014.

 

Multifamily same store rental revenues, property expenses and NOI for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

 

March 31, 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

Change

 

 

($ in thousands)

 

 

 

Rental revenues

    

$

3,051

    

$

2,937

    

$

114

Property expenses

 

 

1,321

 

 

1,250

 

 

71

Same Store NOI

 

$

1,730

 

$

1,687

 

$

43

Non-Same Store NOI

 

 

937

 

 

168

 

 

769

Segment NOI

 

$

2,667

 

$

1,855

 

$

812

 

Multifamily same store NOI for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased 3% compared to the corresponding period in 2015 primarily because of improved leasing at The Cosmopolitan in the Town Center of Virginia Beach and Smith’s Landing.

 

 

 

26


 

Table of Contents

General Contracting and Real Estate Services Segment Data

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

 

 

March 31, 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

Change

 

 

($ in thousands)

 

 

 

Segment revenues

    

$

36,803

    

$

29,071

 

$

7,732

Segment expenses

 

 

35,037

 

 

28,142

 

 

6,895

Segment gross profit

 

$

1,766

 

$

929

 

 

837

Operating margin

 

 

5.0

%

 

3.2

%

$

1.8

 

Segment profit for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased $0.9 million compared to the corresponding period in 2015 because of higher overall volume on our construction contracts. The overall operating margin on our construction contracts for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased due to the closeout of certain projects and timing of work completed compared to the overall operating margin for the corresponding period in 2015.

 

The changes in third party construction backlog for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

March 31, 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

 

($ in thousands)

Beginning backlog

    

$

83,433

    

$

159,139

New contracts/change orders

 

 

129,501

 

 

8,329

Work performed

 

 

(36,754)

 

 

(29,020)

Ending backlog

 

$

176,180

 

$

138,448

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, we added $64.9 million to backlog for the construction of the Point Street Apartments project, and $61.6 million for the City Center project in Durham, North Carolina.   As of March 31, 2016, we had $63.8 million in backlog on the Point Street Apartments project and $60.6 million in backlog on the City Center project.  

 

As of March 31, 2016, we had $34.3 million in backlog related to the 27th Street Oceanfront hotel project, which we expect to substantially complete in 2017.

 

As of March 31, 2016, we had $9.4 million of backlog on the Exelon construction project at the Inner Harbor of Baltimore, Maryland, which we expect to substantially complete in the second quarter of 2016.

 

 

 

27


 

Table of Contents

Consolidated Results of Operations

 

The following table summarizes the results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

 

March 31, 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

Change

 

 

($ in thousands)

 

 

 

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental revenues

    

$

23,283

    

$

18,190

    

$

5,093

General contracting and real estate services revenues

 

 

36,803

 

 

29,071

 

 

7,732

Total revenues

 

 

60,086

 

 

47,261

 

 

12,825

Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental expenses

 

 

5,329

 

 

4,760

 

 

569

Real estate taxes

 

 

2,349

 

 

1,657

 

 

692

General contracting and real estate services expenses

 

 

35,037

 

 

28,142

 

 

6,895

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

8,149

 

 

4,908

 

 

3,241

General and administrative expenses

 

 

2,484

 

 

2,328

 

 

156

Acquisition, development and other pursuit costs

 

 

704

 

 

171

 

 

533

Impairment charges

 

 

35

 

 

 —

 

 

35

Total expenses

 

 

54,087

 

 

41,966

 

 

12,121

Operating income

 

 

5,999

 

 

5,295

 

 

704

Interest income

 

 

182

 

 

 —

 

 

182

Interest expense

 

 

(3,791)

 

 

(3,046)

 

 

(745)

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 

 

 

 

(227)

 

 

227

Gain on real estate dispositions and acquisitions

 

 

26,674

 

 

6,197

 

 

20,477

Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives

 

 

(2,389)

 

 

(147)

 

 

(2,242)

Other (expense) income

 

 

76

 

 

15

 

 

61

Income before taxes

 

 

26,751

 

 

8,087

 

 

18,664

Income tax benefit (provision)

 

 

(218)

 

 

31

 

 

(249)

Net income

 

$

26,533

 

$

8,118

 

$

18,415

 

Rental revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased $5.1 million compared to the corresponding period in 2015, as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three months ended 

 

 

 

 

March 31, 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

Change

 

 

($ in thousands)

 

 

 

Office

    

$

5,521

    

$

7,703

    

$

(2,182)

Retail

 

 

13,032

 

 

6,625

 

 

6,407

Multifamily

 

 

4,730

 

 

3,862

 

 

868

 

 

$

23,283

 

$

18,190

 

$

5,093

 

Office rental revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2016 decreased 28% compared to the corresponding period in 2015 as a result of the sales of the Sentara Williamsburg, Oceaneering and Richmond Tower office buildings, which contributed $2.3 million in office rental revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared to $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016.  This decrease was offset by rents from new real estate developments. Office same store rental revenues decreased slightly during the three months ended March 31, 2016, driven primarily by lower occupancy at our office buildings, specifically One Columbus and Two Columbus.

 

Retail rental revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased 97% compared to the corresponding period in 2015 as a result of property acquisitions, our delivery of Greentree Shopping Center and organic growth in the same store retail portfolio due to higher occupancy rates. The eleven property retail portfolio contributed $3.6 million in retail rental revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2016.

28


 

Table of Contents

 

Multifamily rental revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased 22% compared to the corresponding period in 2015 as a result of the stabilization of Encore Apartments and Liberty Apartments as well as higher occupancy at The Cosmopolitan. Liberty Apartments stabilized in the third quarter of 2015.

 

 

 

General contracting and real estate services revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased 28% compared to the corresponding period in 2015 as a result of higher construction volume, primarily related to the Exelon, Point Street Apartments, City Center and 27th Street Oceanfront hotel construction projects.

 

Rental expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased $0.6 million compared to the corresponding period in 2015, as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

 

March 31, 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

Change

 

 

($ in thousands)

 

 

 

Office

    

$

1,456

    

$

1,754

    

$

(298)

Retail

 

 

2,336

 

 

1,399

 

 

937

Multifamily

 

 

1,537

 

 

1,607

 

 

(70)

 

 

$

5,329

 

$

4,760

 

$

569

 

Office rental expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2016 decreased compared to the corresponding period in 2015 due to the sales of the Sentara Williamsburg and Richmond Tower office buildings. Retail rental expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased compared to the corresponding period in 2015 as a result of property acquisitions. Multifamily rental expenses decreased due to the disposition of Whetstone Apartments.

 

Real estate taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased $0.6 million compared to the corresponding period in 2015, as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

 

March 31, 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

Change

 

 

($ in thousands)

 

 

 

Office

    

$

539

    

$

691

    

$

(152)

Retail

 

 

1,284

 

 

566

 

 

718

Multifamily

 

 

526

 

 

400

 

 

126

 

 

$

2,349

 

$

1,657

 

$

692

 

Office real estate taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2016 decreased compared to the corresponding period in 2015 due to the sales of the Sentara Williamsburg and Richmond Tower office buildings. Retail and multifamily real estate taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased compared to the corresponding period in 2015 as a result of acquisitions and increases from new tax assessments.

 

General contracting and real estate services expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased 24% compared to the corresponding period in 2015 because of higher volume on our construction contracts.

 

Depreciation and amortization for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased 66% compared to the corresponding period in 2015 as a result of property acquisitions.

 

General and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased 35% compared to the corresponding period in 2015 as a result of higher regulatory and compliance costs as well as higher compensation and benefit costs from increased employee headcount.

 

Acquisition, development and other pursuit costs for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased compared to the corresponding period in 2015. Approximately $0.6 million of the acquisition costs incurred in the three months

29


 

Table of Contents

ended March 31, 2016 were related to the eleven property retail portfolio acquisition. Socastee Commons was the only property acquired during the three months ended March 31, 2015.

 

Impairment charges were not significant for the three months ended March 31, 2016 or 2015.

 

Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased 24% compared to the corresponding period in 2015 primarily as a result of increased borrowings. 

 

The change in fair value of interest rate derivatives for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased $2.2 million due to the adjustment made for interest rate derivatives. 

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2015, we recognized a $0.2 million loss on extinguishment of debt representing the unamortized debt issuance costs associated with repaid mortgages in connection with the closing of our new credit facility. No losses on extinguishment of debt were recognized in the three months ended March 31, 2016.

 

 

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, we recognized a $26.2 million gain on our sale of the Richmond Tower office building. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, we recognized a $6.2 million gain on our sale of the Sentara Williamsburg office building.

 

Income tax benefits (provisions) that we recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 were attributable to the taxable profits and losses of our development and construction businesses that we operate through our TRS.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Overview

 

We believe our primary short-term liquidity requirements consist of general contractor expenses, operating expenses and other expenditures associated with our properties, including tenant improvements, leasing commissions and leasing incentives, dividend payments to our stockholders required to maintain our REIT qualification, debt service, capital expenditures, new real estate development projects and strategic acquisitions. We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements through net cash provided by operations, reserves established from existing cash, borrowings under construction loans to fund new real estate development and construction, borrowings available under our credit facility and proceeds from the sale of common stock through our at-the-market continuous equity offering program (“ATM Equity Offering Program”), which is discussed below.

 

Our long-term liquidity needs consist primarily of funds necessary for the repayment of debt at or prior to maturity, general contracting expenses, property development and acquisitions, tenant improvements and capital improvements. We expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements with net cash from operations, long-term secured and unsecured indebtedness and the issuance of equity and debt securities. We also may fund property development and acquisitions and capital improvements using our credit facility pending long-term financing.

 

As of March 31, 2016, we had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $18.8 million available for both current liquidity needs as well as development activities. We also had restricted cash of $3.7 million available for property improvements and required maintenance. As of March 31, 2016, we had $41.0 million available under our credit facility and $28.5 million available for future issuance under our ATM Equity Offering Program to meet our short-term liquidity requirements.

 

ATM Equity Offering Program

 

On May 5, 2015, we commenced our ATM Equity Offering Program through which we may, from time to time, issue and sell shares of common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $50.0 million. Our sale of shares under the ATM Equity Offering Program will depend on a variety of factors, including among other things, market conditions, the trading price of our common stock, capital needs and our determination of appropriate sources of funding. We have

30


 

Table of Contents

no obligation to sell any shares and may at any time suspend or terminate the ATM Equity Offering Program. Each of our sales agents are entitled to a commission of up to 2.0% of the gross offering proceeds of shares that they sell through the ATM Equity Offering Program. We intend to use any net proceeds from the sale of shares through the ATM Equity Offering Program to fund development or redevelopment activities, fund potential acquisition opportunities, repay indebtedness, including amounts outstanding under our credit facility, or for general corporate purposes. In the three months ended March 31, 2016, we raised $10.1 million of gross proceeds at a weighted average price of $10.76 per share, resulting in net proceeds after offering costs and commissions of $9.8 million.

 

Credit Facility

 

On February 20, 2015, we agreed to a $200.0 million senior unsecured credit facility that includes a $150.0 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility and a $50.0 million senior unsecured term loan facility. The credit facility replaced the prior $155.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility that was scheduled to mature on May 13, 2016. On February 20, 2015, we borrowed $54.0 million under the revolving credit facility and $50.0 million under the term loan facility to repay in full all outstanding amounts due under the prior credit facility and to repay approximately $39.0 million of other indebtedness secured by properties in our portfolio for the purpose of unencumbering those properties. We intend to use future borrowings under the credit facility for general corporate purposes, including funding acquisitions, development and redevelopment of properties in our portfolio and for working capital.

 

The credit facility includes an accordion feature that allows the total commitments to be increased to $350.0 million, subject to certain conditions. On January 5, 2016 and March 31, 2016, we increased the total borrowing capacity to $225.0 million and $250.0 million, respectively, using this feature. The amount permitted to be borrowed under the credit facility, together with all of our other unsecured indebtedness, is generally limited to the lesser of: (i) 60% of the value of our unencumbered borrowing base properties, (ii) the maximum amount of principal that would result in a debt service coverage ratio of 1.50 to 1.0, and (iii) the maximum aggregate loan commitment, which currently is $250.0 million.

 

 

 

The revolving credit facility has a scheduled maturity date of February 20, 2019, with a one-year extension option, subject to certain conditions. The term loan facility has a scheduled maturity date of February 20, 2020. We may, at any time, voluntarily prepay any loan under the credit facility in whole or in part without premium or penalty.

 

The revolving credit facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.40% to 2.00%, depending on our total leverage. The term loan facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.35% to 1.95%, depending on our total leverage. We are also obligated to pay an unused commitment fee of 15 or 25 basis points on the unused portions of the commitments under the credit facility, depending on the amount of borrowings under the credit facility. If we attain investment grade credit ratings from S&P and Moody’s, we may elect to have borrowings become subject to interest rates based on our credit ratings.

 

On February 25, 2016, we entered into an amendment to the credit facility to, among other things, amend the maximum leverage ratio as set forth below.

 

The credit facility requires us to comply with various financial covenants, affirmative covenants and other restrictions, including the following:

 

·

Total leverage ratio of the Company of not more than 60% (or 65% for the two consecutive quarters following any acquisition that is equal to or greater than 10% of our total asset value (as defined in the credit agreement), but only up to two times during the term of the credit facility);

 

·

Ratio of adjusted EBITDA to fixed charges of the Company of not less than 1.50 to 1.0;

 

·

Tangible net worth of not less than the sum of $220.0 million and 75% of the net equity proceeds received after December 31, 2014;

 

·

Ratio of variable rate indebtedness to total asset value of not more than 30%;

 

31


 

Table of Contents

·

Ratio of secured indebtedness to total asset value of not more than 45%; and

 

·

Ratio of secured recourse debt to total asset value of not more than 25%.

 

The credit facility limits our ability to pay cash dividends. However, so long as no default or event of default exists, the credit agreement allows us to pay cash dividends with respect to any 12-month period in an amount not to exceed the greater of: (i) 95% of adjusted funds from operations (as defined in the credit agreement) or (ii) the amount required for us (a) to maintain our status as a REIT and (b) to avoid income or excise tax under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. If certain defaults or events of default exist, we may pay cash dividends with respect to any 12-month period to the extent necessary to maintain our status as a REIT. The credit facility also restricts the amount of capital that we can invest in specific categories of assets, such as unimproved land holdings, development properties, notes receivable, mortgages, mezzanine loans and unconsolidated affiliates.

 

We are currently in compliance with all covenants under the credit facility.

 

 

 

32


 

Table of Contents

Consolidated Indebtedness

 

The following table sets forth our consolidated indebtedness as of March 31, 2016 ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effective Rate for

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

Interest

 

Variable-Rate

 

 

 

Balance at

 

Secured Debt

    

Outstanding

    

Rate(a)

    

Debt

    

Maturity Date

    

Maturity

  

249 Central Park Retail

 

$

15,207

 

5.99

%  

 

 

September 8, 2016

 

$

15,084

 

South Retail

 

 

6,709

 

5.99

 

 

 

September 8, 2016

 

 

6,655

 

Fountain Plaza Retail

 

 

7,604

 

5.99

 

 

 

September 8, 2016

 

 

7,542

 

4525 Main Street

 

 

31,613

 

LIBOR+1.95

 

2.39

%  

January 30, 2017

 

 

31,613

 

Encore Apartments

 

 

25,184

 

LIBOR+1.95

 

2.39

%  

January 30, 2017

 

 

25,184

 

North Point Note 5

 

 

659

 

LIBOR+2.00

 

3.57

%(b)  

February 1, 2017

 

 

641

 

Oyster Point

 

 

6,400

 

LIBOR+1.40 to 2.00

 

1.99

%  

February 28, 2017

 

 

6,400

 

Harrisonburg Regal

 

 

3,412

 

6.06

 

 

 

June 8, 2017

 

 

3,165

 

Commonwealth of Virginia – Chesapeake

 

 

4,933

 

LIBOR+1.90

 

2.34

%  

August 28, 2017

 

 

4,933

 

Hanbury Village

 

 

20,904

 

6.67

 

 

 

October 11, 2017

 

 

20,499

 

Lightfoot Marketplace

 

 

8,536

 

LIBOR+1.90

 

2.34

%  

November 14, 2017

 

 

7,759

 

Sandbridge Commons

 

 

9,442

 

LIBOR+1.85

 

2.29

%  

January 17, 2018

 

 

9,442

 

Columbus Village Note 1

 

 

6,387

 

LIBOR+2.00

 

3.05

%(b)  

April 5, 2018

 

 

6,033

 

Columbus Village Note 2

 

 

2,300

 

LIBOR+2.00

 

2.44

%  

April 5, 2018

 

 

2,205

 

Johns Hopkins Village

 

 

16,443

 

LIBOR+1.90

 

2.34

%  

July 30, 2018

 

 

16,443

 

North Point Note 1

 

 

9,922

 

6.45

 

 

 

February 5, 2019

 

 

9,333

 

Socastee Commons

 

 

4,934

(c)  

4.57

 

 

 

January 6, 2023

 

 

4,223

 

North Point Note 2

 

 

2,638

 

7.25

 

 

 

September 15, 2025

 

 

1,344

 

Smith's Landing

 

 

21,049

 

4.05

 

 

 

June 1, 2035

 

 

 —

 

Liberty Apartments

 

 

20,237

(c)  

5.66

 

 

 

November 1, 2043

 

 

 —

 

The Cosmopolitan

 

 

46,363

 

3.75

 

 

 

July 1, 2051

 

 

 —

 

Total secured debt

 

$

270,876

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

178,498

 

Unsecured Debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revolving credit facility

 

 

101,000

 

LIBOR+1.40 to 2.00

 

1.99

%  

February 20, 2019

 

 

101,000

 

Term loan

 

 

50,000

 

LIBOR+1.35 to 1.95

 

1.94

%  

February 20, 2020

 

 

50,000

 

Term loan

 

 

50,000

 

LIBOR+1.35 to 1.95

 

3.50

%(b)  

February 20, 2020

 

 

50,000

 

Total unsecured debt

 

$

201,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

201,000

 

Unamortized GAAP adjustments

 

 

(4,565)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 —

 

Indebtedness, net

 

$

467,311

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

379,498

 

 


(a)LIBOR rate is determined by individual lenders.

(b)Subject to an interest rate swap agreement.

(c)Principal balance excluding fair value adjustments.

 

We are currently in compliance with all covenants on our outstanding indebtedness.

 

 

 

 

33


 

Table of Contents

As of March 31, 2016, our outstanding indebtedness matures during the following years (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

    

Percentage of

 

Year

 

Amount Due 

 

Total 

 

2016

 

$

32,260

 

6

%

2017

 

 

103,884

 

22

 

2018

 

 

35,505

 

8

 

2019

 

 

112,465

 

24

 

2020

 

 

102,206

 

22

 

Thereafter

 

 

85,556

 

18

 

 

 

$

471,876

 

100

%

 

Interest Rate Derivatives

 

We may use interest rate derivatives from time to time to manage our exposure to interest rate risks. Using an interest rate swap, we fixed our interest payments under North Point Center Note 5 at 3.57% through maturity on February 1, 2017.

 

On February 20, 2015, we entered into a $50.0 million floating-to-fixed interest rate swap attributable to one-month LIBOR indexed interest payments. The $50.0 million interest rate swap has a fixed rate of 2.00%, an effective date of March 1, 2016 and a maturity date of February 20, 2020. We entered into this interest rate swap agreement in connection with the $50.0 million senior unsecured term loan facility that bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.35% to 1.95%, depending on our total leverage.

 

On July 13, 2015, we entered into a $6.5 million floating-to-fixed interest rate swap attributable to one-month LIBOR indexed interest payments. The $6.5 million interest rate swap has a fixed rate of 3.05%, an effective date of July 13, 2015 and a maturity date of April 5, 2018.

 

As of March 31, 2016, we were party to the following LIBOR interest rate cap agreements ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effective Date

    

Maturity Date

    

Strike Rate

    

Notional Amount

 

October 4, 2013

 

April 1, 2016

 

1.50

%  

 

18,500

 

March 14, 2014

 

March 1, 2017

 

1.25

%  

 

50,000

 

October 26, 2015

 

October 15, 2017

 

1.25

%  

 

75,000

 

February 25, 2016

 

March 1, 2018

 

1.50

%

 

75,000

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

$

218,500

 

 

As of March 31, 2016, the notional amounts of our LIBOR interest rate cap agreements with strike rates below and above 1.50% were as follows ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

Strike Rate

    

Notional Amount 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

93,500

 

> 1.50%

 

 

125,000

 

Total

 

$

218,500

 

 

On February 25, 2016, we entered into a LIBOR interest rate cap agreement on a notional amount of $75.0 million at a strike rate of 1.50% for a premium of less than $0.1 million.  The interest rate cap agreement expires on March 1, 2018.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We have entered into standby letters of credit relating to the guarantee of future performance on certain of our construction contracts. Letters of credit generally are available for draw down in the event we do not perform. As of March 31, 2016, we had aggregate outstanding standby letters of credit totaling $8.0 million that expire during 2016. In

34


 

Table of Contents

April 2016, the outstanding standby letters of credit were reduced to $2.0 million. However, any of our standby letters of credit may be renewed for additional periods until completion of the underlying contractual obligation.

 

 

 

Cash Flows

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

 

 

March 31, 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

Change

 

 

 

($ in thousands)

 

Operating Activities

    

$

11,308

    

$

(404)

    

$

11,712

 

Investing Activities

 

 

(111,103)

 

 

(8,330)

 

 

(102,773)

 

Financing Activities

 

 

91,616

 

 

14,330

 

 

77,286

 

Net Increase (Decrease)

 

$

(8,179)

 

$

5,596

 

$

(13,775)

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period

 

$

26,989

 

$

25,883

 

 

 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period

 

$

18,810

 

$

31,479

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities during the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased 2,899% compared to the three months ended March 31, 2015, primarily as a result of increased net cash collected under our construction contracts and increased depreciation and amortization.

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, we invested 1,234% more cash compared to the three months ended March 31, 2015, primarily as a result of our acquisition of the eleven property retail portfolio.

 

Net cash provided by financing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased 539% compared to the three months ended March 31, 2015, primarily as a result of net proceeds from common stock sales and increased borrowing on the credit facility.

 

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

 

We calculate FFO in accordance with the standards established by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”). NAREIT defines FFO as net income (loss) (calculated in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of depreciable operating property, real estate related depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of deferred financing costs) and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.

 

FFO is a supplemental non-GAAP financial measure. Management uses FFO as a supplemental performance measure because we believe that FFO is beneficial to investors as a starting point in measuring our operational performance. Specifically, in excluding real estate related depreciation and amortization and gains and losses from property dispositions, which do not relate to or are not indicative of operating performance, FFO provides a performance measure that, when compared year-over-year, captures trends in occupancy rates, rental rates and operating costs. We also believe that, as a widely recognized measure of the performance of REITs, FFO will be used by investors as a basis to compare our operating performance with that of other REITs.

 

However, because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization and captures neither the changes in the value of our properties that result from use or market conditions nor the level of capital expenditures and leasing commissions necessary to maintain the operating performance of our properties, all of which have real economic effects and could materially impact our results from operations, the utility of FFO as a measure of our performance is limited. In addition, other equity REITs may not calculate FFO in accordance with the NAREIT definition as we do, and, accordingly, our calculation of FFO may not be comparable to such other REITs’ calculation of FFO. Accordingly, FFO should be considered only as a supplement to net income as a measure of our performance. FFO should not be used as a measure of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to pay dividends or service indebtedness. Also, FFO should not be used as a supplement to or substitute for cash flow from operating activities computed in accordance with GAAP.

 

35


 

Table of Contents

We also believe that the computation of FFO in accordance with NAREIT’s definition includes certain items that are not indicative of the results provided by the Company’s operating property portfolio and affect the comparability of the Company’s year-over-year performance. Accordingly, management believes that Normalized FFO is a more useful performance measure that excludes certain items, including but not limited to, debt extinguishment losses and prepayment penalties, property acquisition, development and other pursuit costs, mark-to-market adjustments for interest rate derivatives and other non-comparable items.

 

 

 

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of FFO and Normalized FFO for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 to net income, the most directly comparable GAAP equivalent:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

March 31, 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

 

($ in thousands)

Net income

    

$

26,533

    

$

8,118

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

8,149

 

 

4,908

Gain on real estate dispositions and acquisitions

 

 

(26,244)

 

 

(6,197)

Funds from operations

 

$

8,438

 

$

6,829

Acquisition, development and other pursuit costs

 

 

704

 

 

171

Impairment charges

 

 

35

 

 

 —

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 

 

 

 

227

Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives

 

 

2,389

 

 

147

Normalized funds from operations

 

$

11,566

 

$

7,374

FFO per diluted share

 

$

0.18

 

$

0.17

Normalized FFO per diluted share

 

$

0.25

 

$

0.19

Weighted average common shares - diluted

 

 

46,218

 

 

39,818

 

The adjustment for gain on real estate dispositions and acquisitions excludes the gain on the Newport News Economic Authority building, because this building was sold before being placed in service.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements that have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to exercise our best judgment in making estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We base our estimates on historical experience and other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis, based upon then-currently available information. Actual results could differ from these estimates. We discuss the accounting policies and estimates that are most critical to understanding our reported financial results in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

 

Item  3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

The primary market risk to which we are exposed is interest rate risk. Our primary interest rate exposure is LIBOR. We primarily use fixed interest rate financing to manage our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. On a limited basis, we also use derivative financial instruments to manage interest rate risk. We do not use these derivatives for trading or other speculative purposes.

 

At March 31, 2016, approximately $216.0 million, or 45.8%, of our debt had fixed interest rates and approximately $255.9 million, or 54.2%, had variable interest rates. Assuming no increase in the level of our variable rate debt, if interest rates increased by 1.0%, our cash flow would decrease by approximately $2.6 million per year. At

36


 

Table of Contents

March 31, 2016, LIBOR was approximately 44 basis points. Assuming no increase in the level of our variable rate debt, if LIBOR was reduced to 0 basis points, our cash flow would increase by approximately $1.1 million per year.

 

Item 4.Controls and Procedures

 

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Exchange Act is processed, recorded, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

 

We have carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, regarding the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2016, the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded, as of March 31, 2016, that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act: (i) is processed, recorded, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

There have been no changes to our internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

37


 

Table of Contents

Part II. Other Information

 

Item  1.Legal Proceedings

 

We are not currently a party, as plaintiff or defendant, to any legal proceedings that we believe to be material or which, individually or in the aggregate, would be expected to have a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations if determined adversely to us. We may be subject to on-going litigation relating to our portfolio and the properties comprising our portfolio, and we expect to otherwise be party from time to time to various lawsuits, claims and other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business.

 

Item  1A.Risk Factors

 

There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

 

 

Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

 

None.

 

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, certain of our directors and employees surrendered shares of common stock owned by them to satisfy their minimum statutory federal and state tax obligations associated with the vesting of restricted shares of common stock under our 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2013 Plan”). The following table summarizes all of these repurchases during the three months ended March 31, 2016.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

    

 

 

    

Total Number of

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares Purchased

 

Maximum Number of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

as Part of Publicly

 

Shares that May Yet be

 

 

 

Total Number of

 

Average Price

 

Announced Plans

 

Purchased Under the

 

Period

 

Shares Purchased(1)

 

Paid for Shares(1)

 

or Programs

 

Plans or Programs

 

January 1, 2016 through January 31, 2016

 

 

$

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

February 1, 2016 through February 29, 2016

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

March 1, 2016 through March 31, 2016

 

19,913

 

 

10.80

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

Total

 

19,913

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


(1)The number of shares purchased represents shares of common stock surrendered by certain of our directors and employees to satisfy their statutory minimum federal and state tax obligations associated with the vesting of restricted shares of common stock issued under the 2013 Plan.  With respect to these shares, the price paid per shares is based on the fair value per share at the time of surrender.

 

 

 

Item  3.Defaults on Senior Securities

 

None.

 

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures

 

Not applicable.

 

38


 

Table of Contents

Item  5.Other Information

 

None.

 

Item  6.Exhibits

 

The exhibits listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index are filed, furnished or incorporated by reference (as applicable) as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 

 

 

39


 

Table of Contents

Signatures

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

 

 

 

ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.

 

 

 

Date: May 4, 2016

 

/s/ LOUIS S. HADDAD

 

 

Louis S. Haddad

 

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

 

Date: May 4, 2016

 

/s/ MICHAEL P. O’HARA

 

 

Michael P. O’Hara

 

 

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

 

 

(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)

 

 

 

 

40


 

Table of Contents

Exhibit Index

 

 

 

 

Exhibit No.

 

Description

 

 

 

10.1

 

First Amendment, dated February 25, 2016, to Credit Agreement, dated Feburary 20, 2015, by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and the lenders party thereto.

 

 

 

 

 

 

15.1

 

Acknowledgment of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

 

31.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

 

31.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

 

32.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

 

32.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

 

101.INS

 

XBRL Instance Document

 

 

 

101.SCH

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

 

 

 

101.CAL

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

 

 

 

101.LAB

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

 

 

 

101.PRE

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

 

 

 

101.DEF

 

XBRL Definition Linkbase

 

 

 

 

 

 

41