UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

 

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.   )

 

Filed by the Registrant   x                            

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

 

o Preliminary Proxy Statement

 

o Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

 

o Definitive Proxy Statement

 

x Definitive Additional Materials

 

o Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12

 

INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

x No fee required.

 

o Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

  (1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 
  (2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 
  (3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 
  (4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 
  (5)  

Total fee paid:

 

 

 

o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 

o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

  (1)

Amount Previously Paid:

 

 
  (2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 
  (3)

Filing Party:

 

 
  (4)

Date Filed:

 

 

 

 


 

 

In response to a request for a comment from the company, Ms. Susan Cartwright, Vice President of Corporate Communications of International Game Technology, provided the following statement to Mr. Howard Stutz of the Las Vegas Review-Journal on February 25, 2013, excerpts of which were published in an article by Mr. Stutz later that day.

 

The full text of the statement is set forth below.

 

“At IGT, we welcome and seek to maintain an open dialogue with all shareholders, and it is in that spirit that we have had over 35 exchanges with the Ader / Mathewson Group over the last seven months. While we typically do not comment on individual conversations with shareholders, consistent with the Company’s focus on value creation, the IGT Board of Directors and management team are always receptive to constructive suggestions.”