e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
Or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 001-16427
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Georgia
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
37-1490331
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
601 Riverside Avenue
Jacksonville, Florida
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
32204
(Zip Code) |
(904) 854-5000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES
þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act) YES o NO þ
As
of July 31, 2010, 379,383,565 shares of the Registrants Common Stock were outstanding.
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT
Quarter Ended June 30, 2010
INDEX
1
FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In millions, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
502.0 |
|
|
$ |
430.9 |
|
Settlement deposits |
|
|
43.5 |
|
|
|
50.8 |
|
Trade receivables, net of allowance for
doubtful accounts of $43.5 and $41.8 at
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively |
|
|
737.0 |
|
|
|
765.4 |
|
Settlement receivables |
|
|
61.9 |
|
|
|
62.5 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
23.7 |
|
|
|
30.9 |
|
Receivable from related parties |
|
|
33.4 |
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
144.8 |
|
|
|
141.2 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
71.9 |
|
|
|
80.9 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
71.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,618.2 |
|
|
|
1,666.1 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
368.3 |
|
|
|
375.9 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
8,207.0 |
|
|
|
8,232.9 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
2,296.0 |
|
|
|
2,396.8 |
|
Computer software, net |
|
|
905.3 |
|
|
|
932.7 |
|
Deferred contract costs |
|
|
239.7 |
|
|
|
261.4 |
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
131.8 |
|
|
|
131.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
13,766.3 |
|
|
$ |
13,997.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
480.9 |
|
|
$ |
523.2 |
|
Due to Brazilian venture partners |
|
|
73.3 |
|
|
|
73.0 |
|
Settlement payables |
|
|
115.1 |
|
|
|
122.3 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
263.7 |
|
|
|
236.7 |
|
Deferred revenues |
|
|
279.2 |
|
|
|
279.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,212.2 |
|
|
|
1,234.7 |
|
Deferred revenues |
|
|
89.2 |
|
|
|
104.8 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
856.4 |
|
|
|
915.9 |
|
Long-term debt, excluding current portion |
|
|
2,697.2 |
|
|
|
3,016.6 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
232.8 |
|
|
|
207.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
5,087.8 |
|
|
|
5,479.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIS stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock $0.01 par value; 200
shares authorized, none issued and
outstanding at June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $0.01 par value; 600
shares authorized, 381.1 shares issued
at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
Additional paid in capital |
|
|
7,242.2 |
|
|
|
7,345.1 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,280.4 |
|
|
|
1,134.6 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings |
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
82.2 |
|
Treasury stock, $0.01 par value, 2.4
and 6.6 shares at June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively, at
cost |
|
|
(66.4 |
) |
|
|
(256.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total FIS stockholders equity |
|
|
8,476.1 |
|
|
|
8,308.9 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
202.4 |
|
|
|
209.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
8,678.5 |
|
|
|
8,518.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
13,766.3 |
|
|
$ |
13,997.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings
(In millions, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three-month periods |
|
|
Six-month periods |
|
|
|
ended June 30, |
|
|
ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Processing and services revenues (for related party activity, see note 3) |
|
$ |
1,286.1 |
|
|
$ |
829.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,535.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,623.3 |
|
Cost of revenues (for related party activity, see note 3) |
|
|
912.2 |
|
|
|
622.8 |
|
|
|
1,819.4 |
|
|
|
1,241.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
373.9 |
|
|
|
206.4 |
|
|
|
716.3 |
|
|
|
382.1 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses (for related party activity,
see note 3) |
|
|
197.0 |
|
|
|
93.0 |
|
|
|
355.6 |
|
|
|
188.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
176.9 |
|
|
|
113.4 |
|
|
|
360.7 |
|
|
|
193.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(19.3 |
) |
|
|
(31.3 |
) |
|
|
(47.6 |
) |
|
|
(62.5 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
(12.6 |
) |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
(17.9 |
) |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
(31.9 |
) |
|
|
(25.8 |
) |
|
|
(65.5 |
) |
|
|
(55.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
145.0 |
|
|
|
87.6 |
|
|
|
295.2 |
|
|
|
137.4 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
53.6 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
109.2 |
|
|
|
47.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
|
91.4 |
|
|
|
57.5 |
|
|
|
186.0 |
|
|
|
90.2 |
|
Earnings (losses) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
91.1 |
|
|
|
59.6 |
|
|
|
184.6 |
|
|
|
92.3 |
|
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to FIS common stockholders |
|
$ |
89.9 |
|
|
$ |
59.2 |
|
|
$ |
183.5 |
|
|
$ |
92.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share basic from continuing operations attributable to FIS
common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
Net earnings per share basic from discontinued operations attributable to
FIS common stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share basic attributable to FIS common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic |
|
|
376.5 |
|
|
|
190.3 |
|
|
|
374.9 |
|
|
|
190.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share diluted from continuing operations attributable to
FIS common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
Net earnings per share diluted from discontinued operations attributable to
FIS common stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share diluted attributable to FIS common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
384.6 |
|
|
|
192.7 |
|
|
|
382.3 |
|
|
|
192.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid per share |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts attributable to FIS common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
90.2 |
|
|
$ |
57.1 |
|
|
$ |
184.9 |
|
|
$ |
90.1 |
|
Earnings (losses) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to FIS common stockholders |
|
$ |
89.9 |
|
|
$ |
59.2 |
|
|
$ |
183.5 |
|
|
$ |
92.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Equity and Comprehensive Earnings
(In millions, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIS Stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid In |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balances, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
381.1 |
|
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
$ |
7,345.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,134.6 |
|
|
$ |
82.2 |
|
|
$ |
(256.8 |
) |
|
$ |
209.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,518.6 |
|
Exercise of stock options and stock purchase right |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(136.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86.3 |
|
Excess income tax benefit from exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32.2 |
) |
Cash dividends paid ($0.10 per share) and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39.3 |
) |
Other noncontrolling interest transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Comprehensive earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
184.6 |
|
|
|
184.6 |
|
Other comprehensive earnings, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments and
derivatives, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
Unrealized gain (loss) on foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
|
(63.9 |
) |
|
|
(63.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
112.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, June 30, 2010 |
|
|
381.1 |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
$ |
7,242.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,280.4 |
|
|
$ |
16.1 |
|
|
$ |
(66.4 |
) |
|
$ |
202.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,678.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In millions)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-month periods |
|
|
|
ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
184.6 |
|
|
$ |
92.3 |
|
Adjustment to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
305.1 |
|
|
|
184.1 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
26.4 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(44.9 |
) |
|
|
(31.8 |
) |
Excess income tax benefit from exercise of stock options |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Other operating activities, net |
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Net changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables |
|
|
48.8 |
|
|
|
93.8 |
|
Settlement receivables |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
|
|
19.3 |
|
Deferred contract costs |
|
|
(20.6 |
) |
|
|
(25.3 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
2.5 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities, and other liabilities |
|
|
(48.8 |
) |
|
|
(31.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
445.2 |
|
|
|
331.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property and equipment |
|
|
(47.6 |
) |
|
|
(27.1 |
) |
Additions to computer software |
|
|
(86.6 |
) |
|
|
(69.1 |
) |
Net proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
71.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(46.6 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
Other investing activities, net |
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(73.3 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
4,250.1 |
|
|
|
1,198.7 |
|
Repayment of borrowings |
|
|
(4,544.3 |
) |
|
|
(1,420.1 |
) |
Capitalized debt issuance costs |
|
|
(17.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess income tax benefit from exercise of stock options |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
86.3 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Treasury stock purchases |
|
|
(32.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid and other distributions |
|
|
(39.3 |
) |
|
|
(19.1 |
) |
Other financing activity |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(288.5 |
) |
|
|
(234.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(12.3 |
) |
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
71.1 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
430.9 |
|
|
|
220.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
502.0 |
|
|
$ |
227.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
64.2 |
|
|
$ |
61.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for taxes |
|
$ |
139.5 |
|
|
$ |
89.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, all references to FIS, we, the
Company or the registrant are to Fidelity National Information Services, Inc., a Georgia
corporation, and its subsidiaries, and all references to Metavante are to Metavante Technologies,
Inc., and its subsidiaries, as acquired by FIS on October 1, 2009.
(1) Basis of Presentation
The unaudited financial information included in this report includes the accounts of FIS and
its subsidiaries prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and the
instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. All adjustments considered necessary
for a fair presentation have been included. This report should be read in conjunction with the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. The preparation of these
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reported periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain
reclassifications have been made in the 2009 Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements to conform
to the classifications used in 2010.
We report the results of our operations in four reporting segments: 1) Financial Solutions
Group (FSG), 2) Payment Solutions Group (PSG), 3) International Solutions Group (ISG) and 4)
Corporate and Other (Note 11).
(2) Change in Accounting for Revenue Recognition
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update No. 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements (ASU 2009-13). This new standard
revises the guidance for determining whether multiple deliverables in an arrangement can be
separated for revenue recognition and how the consideration should be allocated. It eliminates the
use of the residual method of revenue recognition and requires the allocation of consideration to
each deliverable using the relative selling price method. The selling price for each deliverable is
based on vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) if available, third-party evidence (TPE) if
VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price (ESP) if neither VSOE or TPE is available.
FIS early adopted the provisions of ASU 2009-13 prospectively for all new and materially
modified arrangements entered into on or after January 1, 2010.
Processing and services revenues year to date through June 30, 2010 would have been
approximately $2.0 million less than reported if the new or materially modified arrangements after
January 1, 2010 had been subject to the prior accounting guidance.
This new guidance did not have a material impact on revenue recognition due to the existence
of VSOE for most of the Companys solutions. While the impact of adopting this change going forward
will be a function of the component elements of new contracts entered into or materially modified,
we expect a minimal impact in the timing and pattern of revenue recognition since we have
established VSOE for those solutions comprising the vast majority of our revenues. The effect of
the change will primarily relate to arrangements that include software licenses with other service
elements that have historically resulted in revenue deferral for certain non-software elements. The
Company does not expect this new accounting guidance to impact its future pricing practices or
go-to-market strategies.
(3) Related Party Transactions
We are party to certain related party agreements described below.
Revenues and Expenses
A detail of related party items included in revenues for the three-month and six-month periods
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 is as follows (in millions):
6
FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Banco Santander item processing revenue |
|
$ |
11.2 |
|
|
$ |
10.1 |
|
|
$ |
22.0 |
|
|
$ |
18.7 |
|
Banco Bradesco item processing revenue |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
Banco Santander Brazilian Venture revenue |
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
Banco Bradesco Brazilian Venture revenue |
|
|
34.4 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
66.8 |
|
|
|
39.5 |
|
FNF data processing services revenue |
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
24.1 |
|
Ceridian data processing services revenue |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Sedgwick data processing services revenue |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
LPS services revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total related party revenues |
|
$ |
79.7 |
|
|
$ |
73.2 |
|
|
$ |
162.1 |
|
|
$ |
136.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 7 for a discussion of the Brazilian outsourced card-processing venture with Banco
Santander and Banco Bradesco (the Brazilian Venture).
A detail of related party items included in operating expenses (net of expense reimbursements)
for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Equipment and real estate leasing with FNF and LPS |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
12.1 |
|
Administrative corporate support and other services with FNF and LPS |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total related party expenses |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
6.1 |
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
11.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNF
We provide data processing services to Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF), our former
parent, consisting primarily of infrastructure support and data center management. The Executive
Chairman of the Board of Directors of FIS is also the Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors
of FNF. Our agreement with FNF runs through June 30, 2013, with an option to renew for one or two
additional years, subject to certain early termination provisions (including the payment of minimum
monthly service and termination fees). During the 2009 third quarter, FNF entered into a
transaction that triggered the repayment of the $5.9 million note payable to FIS. We recorded
interest income related to this note of less than $0.1 million for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009. Historically, FNF has provided to us, and to a lesser extent we have provided to
FNF, certain administrative support services relating to general management and administration. The
pricing for these services, both to and from FNF, is at cost. We also incurred expenses for amounts
paid by us to FNF under leases of certain personal property and technology equipment.
Ceridian
We provide business process outsourcing services to Ceridian Corporation (Ceridian), a
company in which FNF holds an approximate 33% equity interest.
Sedgwick
We provide data processing services to Sedgwick CMS, Inc. (Sedgwick), a company in which FNF
held an approximate 32% equity interest through May 28, 2010. The revenue items with Sedgwick are,
therefore, summarized above as related party activity through May 28, 2010.
LPS
We
provide administrative services to Lender Processing Services, Inc. (LPS) as a result of
the spin-off of this former subsidiary in July, 2008. In addition, we have entered into certain
property management and real estate lease agreements with LPS relating to our Jacksonville
corporate headquarters. LPS remained a related party through March 1, 2010 as Lee A. Kennedy served
as the Executive Vice Chairman and a Director of the Board of FIS as well as the Chairman of the
Board of LPS. Mr. Kennedy joined the FIS board in February 2006 and served as FIS President and
Chief Executive Officer until the acquisition of Metavante on October 1, 2009. Effective March 1,
2010, Mr. Kennedy and the Company mutually agreed that he would no longer serve as an executive
officer and director of the Company and its subsidiaries. The revenue and expense items with LPS
are, therefore, summarized above as related party activity through March 1, 2010.
We believe the amounts earned from or charged by us under each of the foregoing arrangements
are fair and reasonable. We believe our service arrangements are priced within the range of prices
we offer to third parties. However, the amounts we earned or
7
FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued
that were charged under these arrangements were not negotiated at arms-length, and may not
represent the terms that we might have obtained from an unrelated third party.
(4) Unaudited Net Earnings per Share
The basic weighted average shares and common stock equivalents for the three-month and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are computed using the treasury stock method.
The following table summarizes the earnings per share attributable to FIS common stockholders,
for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (in millions, except per
share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Earnings from continuing operations attributable to FIS, net of tax |
|
$ |
90.2 |
|
|
$ |
57.1 |
|
|
$ |
184.9 |
|
|
$ |
90.1 |
|
Earnings (losses) from discontinued operations attributable to FIS, net of tax |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to FIS common stockholders |
|
$ |
89.9 |
|
|
$ |
59.2 |
|
|
$ |
183.5 |
|
|
$ |
92.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic |
|
|
376.5 |
|
|
|
190.3 |
|
|
|
374.9 |
|
|
|
190.2 |
|
Plus: Common stock equivalent shares assumed from conversion of options |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
384.6 |
|
|
|
192.7 |
|
|
|
382.3 |
|
|
|
192.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share basic from continuing operations attributable to FIS common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
Net earnings per share basic from discontinued operations attributable to FIS common stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share basic attributable to FIS common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share diluted from continuing operations attributable to FIS common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
Net earnings per share diluted from discontinued operations attributable to FIS common stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share diluted attributable to FIS common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase approximately 6.3 million shares and 11.3 million shares of our common
stock for the three-month periods and 8.9 million shares and 15.1 million shares of our common
stock for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, were not included in the computation
of diluted earnings per share because they were anti-dilutive.
5) Acquisitions and Dispositions
Metavante
On October 1, 2009, we completed the acquisition of Metavante (the Metavante Acquisition).
Metavante expanded the scale of FIS core processing and payment capabilities, added trust and
wealth management services and added to our EFT capabilities with the NYCE Network. Metavante also
added significant scale to treasury and cash management offerings and provided an entry into the
healthcare and government payments markets.
The total purchase price was as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Metavante common stock |
|
$ |
4,066.4 |
|
Value of Metavante stock awards |
|
|
121.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
4,187.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
We recorded a preliminary allocation of the purchase price to Metavante tangible and
identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair
values as of October 1, 2009. Goodwill was recorded based on the amount by which the purchase price
exceeded the fair value of the net assets acquired. The preliminary purchase price allocation was
as follows (in millions):
8
FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
439.7 |
|
Trade and other receivables |
|
|
237.9 |
|
Land, buildings, and equipment |
|
|
119.8 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
144.4 |
|
Computer software |
|
|
287.7 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
1,572.0 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
4,083.1 |
|
Liabilities assumed |
|
|
(2,673.4 |
) |
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(23.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
4,187.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the liabilities assumed in the Metavante Acquisition (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt including current portion |
|
$ |
1,720.1 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
544.4 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
408.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,673.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Company completed certain tax studies and
appraisals and recorded a reduction of $3.9 million in the provisional goodwill balance, an
offsetting reduction in other liabilities of $2.2 million, an increase in land, buildings and
equipment of $1.5 million and adjustments of less than $1.0 million to trade and other receivables,
accrued liabilities and deferred income taxes. These adjustments were not given retrospective
application to December 31, 2009 due to their immateriality. No additional adjustments were
recorded during the second quarter of 2010.
As of the acquisition date, WPM, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership affiliated with Warburg
Pincus Private Equity IX, L.P. (collectively Warburg Pincus) owned 25% of the outstanding shares
of Metavante common stock, and was a party to a purchase right agreement with Metavante that
granted Warburg Pincus the right to purchase additional shares of Metavante common stock under
certain conditions in order to maintain its relative ownership interest. The Company and Warburg
Pincus entered into a replacement stock purchase right agreement effective upon consummation of the
merger, granting Warburg Pincus the right to purchase comparable FIS shares in lieu of Metavante
shares. The purchase right agreement relates to Metavante employee stock options that were
outstanding as of the date of Warburg Pincus initial investment in Metavante. The stock purchase
right may be exercised quarterly for a number of shares equal to one-third of the number of said
employee stock options exercised during the preceding quarter, at a price equal to one-third of the
aggregate exercise prices for such options. Alternatively, the right may be exercised for a number
of shares equal to the difference between (i) one-third of the number of said employee stock
options exercised during the preceding quarter and (ii) the quotient of one-third of the aggregate
exercise prices of such options exercised divided by the quoted closing price of a common share on
the day immediately before exercise of the purchase right, at a price equal to $.01 per share (Net
Settlement Feature). In March 2010, 0.5 million shares were issued to Warburg Pincus relative to
2009 activity. An additional 20,445 shares were issued during June 2010 relative to first quarter
2010 activity. Warburg Pincus paid a nominal amount for these shares under the Net Settlement
Feature of the agreement. As of June 30, 2010, approximately 5.7 million employee options remained
outstanding that were subject to this purchase right; therefore, the right will permit Warburg
Pincus to purchase at most an additional 1.9 million shares.
Disposition of ClearPar
On October 30, 2009, we entered into a definitive agreement to sell ClearPar because its
operations did not align with our strategic plans. The net assets were classified as held for sale
at December 31, 2009, and the transaction was closed on January 1, 2010. We received proceeds of
$71.5 million. ClearPar had revenues of $5.6 million and $9.3 million during the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. ClearPar had earnings (loss) before taxes of $4.0
million during the three months ended June 30, 2009 and ($1.8) million and $6.1 million during the
six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The operating results of ClearPar for the
three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are recorded as discontinued
operations in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
9
FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued
6) Condensed Consolidated Financial Statement Details
The following tables show the Companys condensed consolidated financial statement details as
of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
Property and equipment |
|
$ |
728.7 |
|
|
$ |
360.4 |
|
|
$ |
368.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
$ |
3,062.5 |
|
|
$ |
766.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,296.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computer software |
|
$ |
1,401.6 |
|
|
$ |
496.3 |
|
|
$ |
905.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
Property and equipment |
|
$ |
697.6 |
|
|
$ |
321.7 |
|
|
$ |
375.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
$ |
3,041.5 |
|
|
$ |
644.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,396.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computer software |
|
$ |
1,381.6 |
|
|
$ |
448.9 |
|
|
$ |
932.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7) Brazilian Venture
In March 2006, we entered into an agreement with ABN AMRO Real (ABN) and Banco Bradesco S.A.
( Banco Bradesco) to form a venture to provide comprehensive, fully outsourced credit card
processing and call center services to Brazilian credit card issuers. During the third quarter of
2008, Banco Santander (Banco Santander) acquired majority control of ABN. Since then, Banco
Santander publicly stated its intention to consolidate all Brazilian card processing operations
onto its own in-house technology platform, and notified the Brazilian Venture during 2009 of its
desire to exit the relationship. In late January 2010, Banco Santander ceased processing its card
portfolio on the Brazilian Ventures systems. We are presently negotiating Banco Santanders exit
from the Brazilian Venture, including an applicable termination payment, ongoing call center
services, forgiveness of notes payable by FIS upon final migration of the card portfolios of Banco
Santander and Banco Bradesco, and waiver of our put agreement, the terms of which must be approved
by Banco Bradesco. We received a partial settlement payment of approximately $34.5 million during
the 2010 first quarter which has been recorded as a deferred liability, pending final resolution of
the negotiations and agreement by all parties.
The Brazilian Venture currently processes approximately 13.6 million cards for Banco Bradesco
and provides call center, cardholder support and collection services for all of Banco Bradescos
card portfolios. As a result of the pending exit of Banco Santander from the Brazilian Venture,
Banco Bradesco and the Company are renegotiating their business relationship under the Brazilian
Venture. Early in the third quarter, Banco Bradesco and FIS agreed in
principle on terms where FIS would
continue to own 51% of the Brazilian Venture and consolidate the results. Banco Bradesco agreed to
migrate processing of its original committed credit card portfolios to the Brazilian Venture.
Additionally, all parties have agreed to the terms of the Santander settlement. We are currently negotiating definitive
agreements.
(8) Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consisted of the following (in
millions):
10
FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Term Loan A-1, secured, quarterly principal amortization (1) |
|
$ |
386.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,890.0 |
|
Term Loan A-2, secured, quarterly principal amortization (2) |
|
|
2,003.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Metavante Term Loan, secured, interest payable at LIBOR plus 3.25% (3.59% at June 30, 2010), maturing November 2014 (3) |
|
|
229.0 |
|
|
|
794.5 |
|
Term Loan C, secured, interest payable at LIBOR plus 4.25% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200.0 |
|
Revolving Loan, secured (4) |
|
|
308.9 |
|
|
|
336.0 |
|
Other promissory notes with various interest rates and maturities |
|
|
32.6 |
|
|
|
32.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,960.9 |
|
|
|
3,253.3 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
(263.7 |
) |
|
|
(236.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, excluding current portion |
|
$ |
2,697.2 |
|
|
$ |
3,016.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The applicable margin for interest payable on the Term Loan A-1 was not affected by the June
29, 2010 amendment and extension of the FIS Credit Agreement discussed below. As of June 30,
2010, the interest rate on the Term Loan A-1 was 1.10%. |
|
(2) |
|
Prior to the June 29, 2010 amendment and extension, interest on the Term Loan A-2 was
generally payable at LIBOR plus an applicable margin of up to 1.25%. Subsequent to the
amendment and extension, interest on the Term Loan A-2 is generally payable at LIBOR plus an
applicable margin of up to 2.5% based upon the Companys leverage ratio, as defined in the
amended and extended credit agreement discussed below and as reported quarterly pursuant
thereto. As of June 30, 2010, the interest rate on the Term Loan A-2 was 2.85%. |
|
(3) |
|
Net of $1.0 million and $3.3 million fair value discount at June 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, respectively. On July 16, 2010, FIS repaid in full the outstanding amount under the
Metavante Term Loan and terminated that credit facility. |
|
(4) |
|
Prior to the June 29, 2010 amendment and extension, interest on the Revolving Loan was
generally payable at LIBOR plus an applicable margin of up to 1.00%, plus a facility fee of up
to 0.25%, based upon the Companys leverage ratio. The pre-amendment pricing continues to
apply for the portion of the Revolving Loan that matures in January 2012, approximately $112.3
million of commitments. Interest on the portion of the Revolving Loan that matures in July
2014 is generally payable at LIBOR plus an applicable margin of up to 2.5%, based upon the
Companys leverage ratio, in addition to an unused commitment fee of 0.50%. As of June 30,
2010, the applicable rates on the 2012 and 2014 Revolving Loan maturities were 0.93% and
2.83%, respectively. A total of $724.8 million of Revolving Loan commitment was unused as of
June 30, 2010. |
On June 29, 2010, we entered into an amendment and extension of our FIS Credit Agreement. The
amendment and extension, among other things, (1) extended the maturity of a portion of the
Revolving Loan and the Term Loan A from January 2012 to July 2014, as described below; (2)
authorized certain increases in the amount of loans available thereunder; and (3) changed pricing
of the loans. The size of the Term Loan A was increased by $562.8 million (the increase was used to
prepay borrowings under our existing Metavante Term Loan). As of June 30, 2010, the aggregate
amount outstanding under Term Loan A was $2,390.4 million (of which $2,003.6 million matures in
July 2014). The size of the Revolving Loan was increased by approximately $141.2 million to an
aggregate amount of $1,033.7 (of which $921.4 million matures in July 2014). The amended FIS Credit
Agreement also provides for an aggregate of $1.9 million of term notes (the LCPI Loans) maturing
on July 18, 2014.
The fair value of the Companys long-term debt at June 30, 2010 is estimated to be
approximately $82.7 million lower than the carrying value (based on values of trades of our debt
made in close proximity to quarter-end, which are considered Level 2 measurements) in accordance
with the authoritative guidance for fair value measurements. These estimates are subjective in
nature and involve uncertainties and significant judgment in the interpretation of current market
data. Therefore, the values presented are not necessarily indicative of amounts the Company could
realize or settle currently.
FIS may borrow, repay and re-borrow amounts under the Revolving Loan from time to time until
the applicable maturities of the tranches included in the Revolving Loan. FIS must make quarterly
principal payments under that portion of the Term Loan A that matures in 2012 (Term Loan A-1) of
$11.3 million per quarter from September 30, 2010 through September 30, 2011, with the remaining
principal balance payable on January 18, 2012. FIS must make quarterly principal payments under
that portion of the Term Loan A that matures in 2014 (Term Loan A-2) of $50.1 million per quarter
from September 30, 2010 through December 31, 2012,
11
FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued
and $75.1 million per quarter from March 31, 2013 through March 31, 2014, with the remaining
principal balance payable on July 18, 2014. Due to a calculation error, the aggregate amount of
the amortization payments made on June 30, 2010 in respect of Term Loan A-1 was less than the
actual amount due on such date under the FIS Credit Agreement. To resolve this administrative
error, FIS funded an aggregate amount of $1.4 million on July 6, 2010, and the administrative agent
for the FIS Credit Agreement disbursed the additional amortization payment of such amount to the
Term Loan A-1 lenders on the same date.
In addition to the scheduled principal payments, the term loans are (with certain exceptions)
subject to mandatory prepayment upon the occurrence of certain events. There were no mandatory
prepayments owed for the period ended June 30, 2010. Voluntary prepayment of the term loans is
generally permitted at any time without fee upon proper notice and subject to a minimum dollar
requirement. Commitment reductions of the Revolving Loan are also permitted at any time without fee
upon proper notice.
The following table summarizes the mandatory annual principal payments with respect to Term
Loan A pursuant to the FIS Credit Agreement and with respect to the Metavante Term Loan pursuant to
Metavante Credit Agreement as of June 30, 2010 (in millions). There are no mandatory principal
payments on the Revolving Loan; any balance outstanding on the Revolving Loan will be due and
payable at the applicable scheduled maturity date of the respective tranches thereof:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metavante |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term Loan A-1 |
|
|
Term Loan A-2 |
|
|
Term Loan |
|
|
Total |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
24.1 |
|
|
$ |
100.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
124.3 |
|
2011 |
|
|
34.0 |
|
|
|
200.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234.4 |
|
2012 |
|
|
328.7 |
|
|
|
200.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
529.1 |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
300.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300.5 |
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,202.1 |
|
|
|
230.0 |
|
|
|
1,432.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
386.8 |
|
|
$ |
2,003.6 |
|
|
$ |
230.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,620.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company also has an agreement to sell certain of its accounts receivable (the AR
Facility) to a wholly-owned special purpose accounts receivable and financing entity, which funds
its purchases, in part, by selling interests to a syndicate of financial institution purchasers in
exchange for capital funding. The AR Facility was also amended on June 30, 2010 primarily to make
conforming changes in regards to the amendment and extension of the FIS Credit Agreement. At June
30, 2010, there was no outstanding capital under the AR Facility.
We monitor the financial stability of our counterparties on an ongoing basis. The lender
commitments under the undrawn portions of the Revolving Loan and AR Facility are comprised of a
diversified set of financial institutions, both domestic and international. The combined
commitments of our top 10 lenders comprise about 69% of our Revolving Loan and AR Facility. The
failure of any single lender to perform their obligations under the Revolving Loan and/or the AR
Facility would not adversely impact our ability to fund operations. If the single largest lender
were to simultaneously default under the terms of both the FIS Credit Agreement (impacting the
capacity of the Revolving Loan) and the AR Facility, the maximum loss of available capacity on the
undrawn portion of these agreements would be about $125.0 million As of June 30, 2010, the combined
undrawn capacity of the Revolving Loan and the AR Facility was $869.8 million.
See also Note 12 for a discussion of debt transactions consummated subsequent to June 30,
2010.
Total debt issuance costs of $21.0 million are capitalized as of June 30, 2010 related to all
of the above credit facilities. Due to the significance of the change in the present value of
expected cash flows from the amendment and extension of our Term Loan A, a portion of the
transaction was treated as a debt extinguishment. Accordingly, certain previously capitalized
costs and fees and expenses related to the transaction totaling $12.8 million were treated as debt
extinguishment expense in the second quarter and are recorded in Other Income (Expense) on the
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings.
As of June 30, 2010, we have entered into the following interest rate swap transactions
converting a portion of the interest rate exposure on our Term and Revolving Loans from variable to
fixed (in millions):
12
FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank Pays |
|
FIS pays |
|
Effective Date |
|
Termination Date |
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
Variable Rate of |
|
Fixed Rate of |
|
April 12, 2010 |
|
April 11, 2011 |
|
$ |
200.0 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR (4) |
|
|
0.76 |
%(5) |
October 20, 2009 |
|
April 20, 2011 |
|
|
700.0 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR (4) |
|
|
0.99 |
%(5) |
February 1, 2010 |
|
May 1, 2011 |
|
|
250.0 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR (4) |
|
|
0.75 |
%(5) |
February 1, 2010 |
|
May 1, 2011 |
|
|
150.0 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR (4) |
|
|
0.74 |
%(5) |
December 11, 2009 |
|
June 13, 2011 |
|
|
200.0 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR (4) |
|
|
0.91 |
%(5) |
February 1, 2008 |
|
February 1, 2012 |
|
|
400.0 |
(1) |
|
3 Month LIBOR (2) |
|
|
3.87 |
%(3) |
February 1, 2008 |
|
February 1, 2012 |
|
|
200.0 |
|
|
3 Month LIBOR (2) |
|
|
3.44 |
%(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Notional value amortized from $600.0 million to $400.0 million on
February 1, 2010 and will amortize from $400.0 million to $200.0
million on February 1, 2011. |
|
(2) |
|
0.53% in effect at June 30, 2010. |
|
(3) |
|
In addition to the fixed rates paid under the swaps, we currently pay
an applicable margin of 3.25%. These swaps were acquired in the
Metavante Acquisition. While the payments are fixed, interest expense
associated with these swaps is recorded based on the floating rate
curve established as of the acquisition date. |
|
(4) |
|
0.35% in effect at June 30, 2010. |
|
(5) |
|
Does not include the applicable margin and facility fees paid to bank
lenders on Term Loan A and Revolving Loan as described above. |
We have designated these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges and as such they are carried
on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value with changes in fair value included in
Other Comprehensive Earnings, net of tax.
A summary of the fair value of the Companys derivative instruments is as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
Value |
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
Value |
|
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
4.8 |
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
13.4 |
|
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
30.0 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
44.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with the authoritative guidance for fair value measurements, the inputs
used to determine the estimated fair value of our interest rate swaps are Level 2-type
measurements. We considered our own credit risk and the credit risk of the counterparties when
determining the fair value of our interest rate swaps. Adjustments are made to these amounts and
to Accumulated Other Comprehensive Earnings within the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Equity
and Comprehensive Earnings as the factors that impact fair value change, including current and
projected interest rates, time to maturity and required cash transfers/settlements with our
counterparties. Periodic actual and estimated settlements with counterparties are recorded to
interest expense as a yield adjustment to effectively fix the otherwise variable rate interest
expense associated with the Term and Revolving Loans.
As part of the Metavante Acquisition, the Company assumed interest rate swap liabilities with
a fair value at October 1, 2009 of $45.1 million. During the 2009 fourth quarter, the Company
terminated swaps for $10.0 million resulting in net acquired swap liabilities of $35.1 million. The
fair value of the remaining acquired swaps was $25.2 million on June 30, 2010.
A summary of the effect of derivative instruments on the Companys Consolidated Statements of
Earnings and recognized in Other Comprehensive Earnings (OCE) for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009 is as follows (in millions):
13
FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Loss Reclassified |
|
|
|
Recognized in OCE on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
from Accumulated OCE into |
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three |
|
|
Location of Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives in Cash |
|
Three Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
Flow Hedging |
|
Ended June |
|
|
Ended June |
|
|
Accumulated OCE into |
|
|
Ended June |
|
|
Ended June |
|
Relationships |
|
30, 2010 |
|
|
30, 2009 |
|
|
Income |
|
|
30, 2010 |
|
|
30, 2009 |
|
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
$ |
(5.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.8 |
) |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(8.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(22.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Loss Reclassified |
|
|
|
Recognized in OCE on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
from Accumulated OCE into |
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives in Cash |
|
Six Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
Flow Hedging |
|
Ended June |
|
|
Ended June |
|
|
Accumulated OCE into |
|
|
Ended June |
|
|
Ended June |
|
Relationships |
|
30, 2010 |
|
|
30, 2009 |
|
|
Income |
|
|
30, 2010 |
|
|
30, 2009 |
|
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
$ |
(22.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(10.5 |
) |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(26.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(44.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximately $6.0 million of the balance in Accumulated OCE at June 30, 2010 is expected to
be reclassified into earnings over the next twelve months.
Our existing cash flow hedges are highly effective and there was no impact on earnings due to
hedge ineffectiveness. It is our practice to execute such instruments with credit-worthy banks at
the time of execution and not to enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative
purposes. As of June 30, 2010, we believe that our interest rate swap counterparties will be able
to fulfill their obligations under our agreements and we believe we will have debt outstanding
through the various expiration dates of the swaps such that the forecasted transactions remain
probable of occurring.
Our foreign exchange risk management policy permits the use of derivative instruments, such as
forward contracts and options, to reduce volatility in our results of operations and/or cash flows
resulting from foreign exchange rate fluctuations. Our international operations revenues and
expenses are generally denominated in local currency, which limits the economic exposure to foreign
exchange risk in those jurisdictions. We do not enter into foreign currency derivative instruments
for trading purposes. At June 30, 2010, we had no foreign currency derivative instruments
outstanding.
(9) Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
In the ordinary course of business, the Company is involved in various pending and threatened
litigation matters related to operations, some of which include claims for punitive or exemplary
damages. The Company believes that no actions, other than the matters listed below, depart from
customary litigation incidental to its business. As background to the disclosure below, please note
the following:
|
|
|
These matters raise difficult and complicated factual and legal issues and are subject
to many uncertainties and complexities. |
|
|
|
The Company reviews these matters on an on-going basis and follows the authoritative
provisions for accounting for contingencies when making accrual and disclosure decisions. A
liability must be accrued if (a) it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a
liability has been incurred and (b) the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. If one
of these criteria has not been met, disclosure is required when there is at least a
reasonable possibility that a loss may have been incurred. When assessing reasonably
possible and probable outcomes, the Company bases decisions on the assessment of the
ultimate outcome following all appeals. Legal fees associated with defending these matters
are expensed as incurred. |
Drivers Privacy Protection Act
A putative class action lawsuit styled Richard Fresco, et al. v. Automotive Directions, Inc.
et al., was filed against eFunds Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of FIS (eFunds), and
seven other non-related parties in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
during the second quarter of 2003. The complaint alleged that eFunds purchased motor vehicle
records that were used for marketing and other purposes that are not permitted under the Federal
Drivers Privacy Protection Act (DPPA). The plaintiffs sought statutory damages, plus costs,
attorneys fees and injunctive relief. eFunds and five of the other seven defendants
14
FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued
settled the case with the plaintiffs. That settlement was approved by the court over the objection
of a group of Texas drivers and motor vehicle record holders. The Fresco plaintiffs moved to amend
the courts order approving the settlement in order to seek a greater attorneys fee award and to
recover supplemental costs. In the meantime, the objectors filed two class action complaints styled
Sharon Taylor, et al. v. Biometric Access Company et al. and Sharon Taylor, et al. v. Acxiom et
al. in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas during the first quarter of 2007
alleging similar violations of the DPPA. The Acxiom action was filed against the Companys
ChexSystems, Inc. subsidiary, while the Biometric suit was filed against the Companys Certegy
Check Services, Inc. subsidiary. The judge recused himself in the Biometric action against Certegy
because he was a potential member of the class. The lawsuit was then assigned to a new judge and
Certegy filed a motion to dismiss. The district court granted Certegys motion to dismiss with
prejudice in the third quarter of 2008. The Biometric plaintiffs appealed and after several
extensions, arguments on appeal were heard on November 4, 2009. In the Acxiom case, ChexSystems
filed a motion to dismiss or in the alternative, stay the action against it based upon the earlier
settlement, and the court granted the motion to stay pending resolution of the Florida case. The
court dismissed the ChexSystems lawsuit with prejudice against the remaining defendants in the
third quarter of 2008. The Acxiom plaintiffs moved the court to amend the dismissal to exclude
defendants that were parties to the Florida settlement, and that motion was granted. In the fourth
quarter of 2008, the court in the ChexSystems case dismissed with prejudice all claims of the
plaintiffs who were not also plaintiffs in the Florida case, against ChexSystems and the other
defendants. The plaintiffs appealed the dismissal order, but excluded ChexSystems and the other
settling defendants from the appeal. The Florida case was dismissed without prejudice during the
fourth quarter of 2009. After final resolution of the Florida case, the parties in the Acxiom case
stipulated to a dismissal of ChexSystems and the other defendants from this action, and the court
issued its final order of dismissal without prejudice. The time for appeals in the Acxiom case has
now expired. In the Biometric case, on July 14, 2010, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed
the district courts order of dismissal with prejudice.
Searcy, Gladys v. eFunds Corporation
This is a nationwide putative class action that was originally filed against eFunds and its
affiliate Deposit Payment Protection Services, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of Illinois during the first quarter of 2008. The complaint seeks damages for an alleged
willful violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) in connection with the operation of the
Shared Check Authorization Network. Plaintiffs principal allegation is that consumers did not
receive appropriate disclosures pursuant to § 1681g of the FCRA because the disclosures did not
include: (i) all information in the consumers file at the time of the request; (ii) the source of
the information in the consumers file; and/or (iii) the names of any persons who requested
information related to the consumers check writing history during the prior year. The Company
answered the complaint and is vigorously defending the matter. Plaintiff filed a motion for class
certification which was granted with respect to two subclasses during the first quarter of 2010.
The motion was denied with respect to all other subclasses. The Company filed a motion for
reconsideration. The motion was granted and the two subclasses were decertified. The plaintiff also
filed motions to amend her complaint to add two additional plaintiffs to the lawsuit. The court
granted the motions. Discovery regarding the new plaintiffs is ongoing. During the second quarter
of 2010, the Company filed a motion for summary judgment as to plaintiff and a motion for sanctions
against the plaintiff and her counsel based on plaintiffs alleged false statements that were filed
in support of the motion for class certification.
Indemnifications and Warranties
The Company often indemnifies its customers against damages and costs resulting from claims of
patent, copyright, or trademark infringement associated with use of its software through software
licensing agreements. Historically, the Company has not made any significant payments under such
indemnifications, but continues to monitor the conditions that are subject to the indemnifications
to identify whether it is probable that a loss has occurred, and would recognize any such losses
when they are estimable. In addition, the Company warrants to customers that its software operates
substantially in accordance with the software specifications. Historically, no significant costs
have been incurred related to software warranties and no accruals for warranty costs have been
made.
(10) Share Repurchase Program and Recapitalization Plan
On February 4, 2010 our Board of Directors approved a plan authorizing repurchases of up to
15.0 million shares of our common stock in the open market, at prevailing market prices or in
privately negotiated transactions, through January 31, 2013. We repurchased 1.4 million shares of
our common stock for $32.2 million, at an average price of $22.97 through March 31, 2010. No
shares were repurchased during the three months ended June 30, 2010.
On May 25, 2010, our Board of Directors authorized a leveraged recapitalization plan to
repurchase up to $2.5 billion of our common stock at a price range of $29.00 $31.00 per share of
common stock through a modified Dutch auction tender offer. Under this offer, FIS shareholders
may tender all or a portion of their common shares within the price range set forth above. Based on
the number of shares tendered and the prices specified by the tendering shareholders, the Company
will determine the lowest price per
15
FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued
share within the range at which the Company can purchase up to $2.5 billion of its common stock or
such lesser number of shares as is properly tendered. The tender offer commenced on July 6, 2010
and expired on August 3, 2010.
(11) Segment Information
Summarized financial information for the Companys segments is shown in the following tables.
As of and for the three-months ended June 30, 2010 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FSG |
|
|
PSG |
|
|
ISG |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Processing and services revenues |
|
$ |
458.3 |
|
|
$ |
630.6 |
|
|
$ |
200.7 |
|
|
$ |
(3.5 |
) |
|
$ |
1,286.1 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
295.5 |
|
|
|
423.0 |
|
|
|
179.3 |
|
|
|
211.4 |
|
|
|
1,109.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
162.8 |
|
|
$ |
207.6 |
|
|
$ |
21.4 |
|
|
$ |
(214.9 |
) |
|
|
176.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
145.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
37.8 |
|
|
$ |
24.7 |
|
|
$ |
15.0 |
|
|
$ |
74.8 |
|
|
$ |
152.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
45.5 |
|
|
$ |
13.4 |
|
|
$ |
14.4 |
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
76.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,851.4 |
|
|
$ |
4,773.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,723.1 |
|
|
$ |
2,417.9 |
|
|
$ |
13,766.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
3,736.7 |
|
|
$ |
4,023.4 |
|
|
$ |
446.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,207.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FSG |
|
|
PSG |
|
|
ISG |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Processing and services revenues |
|
$ |
269.9 |
|
|
$ |
379.2 |
|
|
$ |
180.7 |
|
|
$ |
(0.6 |
) |
|
$ |
829.2 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
181.0 |
|
|
|
282.9 |
|
|
|
160.9 |
|
|
|
91.0 |
|
|
|
715.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
88.9 |
|
|
$ |
96.3 |
|
|
$ |
19.8 |
|
|
$ |
(91.6 |
) |
|
|
113.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
87.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
20.9 |
|
|
$ |
17.6 |
|
|
$ |
14.3 |
|
|
$ |
39.2 |
|
|
$ |
92.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
24.3 |
|
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
|
$ |
18.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
50.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,847.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,232.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,432.7 |
|
|
$ |
823.1 |
|
|
$ |
7,335.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
2,044.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,677.6 |
|
|
$ |
426.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,148.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2010 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FSG |
|
|
PSG |
|
|
ISG |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Processing and services revenues |
|
$ |
901.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,249.4 |
|
|
$ |
395.7 |
|
|
$ |
(11.2 |
) |
|
$ |
2,535.7 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
591.3 |
|
|
|
837.0 |
|
|
|
358.1 |
|
|
|
388.6 |
|
|
|
2,175.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
310.5 |
|
|
$ |
412.4 |
|
|
$ |
37.6 |
|
|
$ |
(399.8 |
) |
|
|
360.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
295.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
75.7 |
|
|
$ |
49.3 |
|
|
$ |
30.4 |
|
|
$ |
149.7 |
|
|
$ |
305.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
75.7 |
|
|
$ |
28.1 |
|
|
$ |
26.3 |
|
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
|
$ |
134.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 (in millions):
16
FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FSG |
|
|
PSG |
|
|
ISG |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Processing and services revenues |
|
$ |
536.2 |
|
|
$ |
743.5 |
|
|
$ |
344.7 |
|
|
$ |
(1.1 |
) |
|
$ |
1,623.3 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
373.7 |
|
|
|
561.4 |
|
|
|
310.3 |
|
|
|
184.7 |
|
|
|
1,430.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
162.5 |
|
|
$ |
182.1 |
|
|
$ |
34.4 |
|
|
$ |
(185.8 |
) |
|
|
193.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
137.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
41.4 |
|
|
$ |
35.5 |
|
|
$ |
27.2 |
|
|
$ |
79.8 |
|
|
$ |
183.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
48.5 |
|
|
$ |
14.9 |
|
|
$ |
27.9 |
|
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
94.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers in Brazil, Germany and the United Kingdom accounted for the majority of the revenues
from non-U.S. based customers.
Financial Solutions Group
FSG focuses on serving the processing needs of financial institutions, commercial lenders,
finance companies and other businesses. FSGs primary software applications function as the
underlying infrastructure of a financial institutions processing environment. These applications
include core bank processing software, which banks use to maintain the primary records of their
customer accounts. FSG also provides a number of complementary applications and services that
interact directly with the core processing applications, including applications that facilitate
interactions between FSGs financial institution customers and their clients. FSG offers
applications and services through a range of delivery and service models, including on-site
outsourcing and remote processing arrangements, as well as on a licensed software basis for
installation on customer-owned and operated systems. FSG also offers technology solutions, ranging
in scope from consulting engagements to application development projects and from operations
support for a single application to full management of information technology infrastructures.
Outsourced customer service teams, both onshore and offshore, are also provided.
Payment Solutions Group
PSG provides a comprehensive set of software and services for EFT, network, card processing,
image, bill payment, government and healthcare solutions for North America. PSG is focused on
servicing the payment and electronic funds transfer needs of North American headquartered banks and
credit unions, automotive financial companies, commercial lenders, and independent community and
savings institutions.
International Solution Group
ISG offers both financial solutions and payment solutions to a wide array of international
financial institutions. Also, this segment includes the Companys consolidated Brazilian Venture
(see note 7). Included in this segment are long-term assets, excluding goodwill and other
intangible assets, located outside of the United States totaling $470.0 million and $442.7 million
at June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. These assets are predominantly located in Germany, Brazil,
the United Kingdom and India.
Corporate and Other
The Corporate and Other segment consists of the corporate overhead costs and interest expense
that are not allocated to operating segments. Corporate overhead costs relate to human resources,
finance, legal, accounting, domestic sales and marketing, merger and acquisition activity and
amortization of acquisition-related intangibles and other costs that are not considered when
management evaluates segment performance.
(12) Subsequent Events
Long Term Debt
On July 16, 2010, we completed offerings of $600.0 million aggregate principal amount of
7.625% Senior Notes due 2017 (the 2017 Notes) and $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of
7.875% Senior Notes due 2020 (the 2020 Notes and together with the 2017 Notes, the Notes). FIS
issued the Notes in two separate series under an indenture dated as of July 16, 2010 among FIS,
FIS domestic subsidiaries that guaranteed its amended credit facility (the Guarantors) and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. The Notes were offered and sold in the
United States to qualified institutional buyers in reliance on Rule 144A under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and outside the United States to non-U.S. persons in
17
FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued
reliance on Regulation S under the Securities Act. The Notes have not been registered under the
Securities Act and may not be offered or sold without registration unless pursuant to an exemption
from, or in a transaction not subject to, the registration requirements of the Securities Act and
all applicable state laws. We have agreed to exchange each series of the Notes for a new issue of
substantially identical notes registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as soon as practicable but in no event later than 360 days after the July 16, 2010, closing.
Interest on the 2017 Notes accrues at the rate of 7.625% per annum and interest on the 2020
Notes accrues at the rate of 7.875% per annum. Interest on each series of Notes is payable
semi-annually in cash in arrears on January 15 and July 15 of each year, commencing on January 15,
2011. The Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by each of
the Guarantors.
The Notes and the related guarantees will be general senior unsecured obligations of FIS and
the Guarantors and will (1) rank equally in right of payment with all of FIS and the Guarantors
existing and future senior debt, (2) be effectively junior to all of FIS and the Guarantors
existing and future secured debt to the extent of the value of the assets securing that secured
debt, (3) be effectively junior to all existing and future debt and liabilities of FIS
non-guarantor subsidiaries and (4) rank senior in right of payment to all of FIS future debt, if
any, that is by its terms expressly subordinated to the Notes.
FIS may redeem some or all of the 2017 Notes and the 2020 Notes before July 15, 2013 and July
15, 2014, respectively, by paying a make-whole premium. FIS may redeem some or all of the 2017
Notes and the 2020 Notes on or after July 15, 2013 and July 15, 2014, respectively, at specified
redemption prices. In addition, before July 15, 2013, FIS may redeem up to 35% of the Notes with
the net proceeds of certain equity offerings.
FIS is obligated to offer to repurchase the Notes at a price of (a) 101% of their principal
amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, as a result of certain change of control events
and (b) 100% of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, in the event of
certain asset sales. These restrictions and prohibitions are subject to certain qualifications and
exceptions.
The indenture contains covenants that, among other things, limit FIS ability and the ability
of certain of FIS subsidiaries (a) to incur or guarantee additional indebtedness, (b) to make
certain restricted payments, (c) to create or incur certain liens, (d) to create restrictions on
the payment of dividends or other distributions to FIS from its restricted subsidiaries, (e) to
engage in sale and leaseback transactions, (f) to transfer all or substantially all of the assets
of FIS or any restricted subsidiary or enter into merger or consolidation transactions and (g) to
engage in certain transactions with affiliates. These covenants are subject to a number of
exceptions, limitations and qualifications in the indenture.
On July 16, 2010, FIS, entered into a Joinder Agreement (the Joinder Agreement), under which
FIS issued a new tranche of term loans under the FIS Credit Agreement in an aggregate principal
amount of $1.5 billion (the Term Loan B). The Term Loan B is subject in all material respects to
the provisions applicable to other term loans under the FIS Credit Agreement. Interest on the Term
Loan B will be generally payable at LIBOR plus 3.75% per annum (with LIBOR subject to a floor of
1.50%). The Term Loan B is subject to mandatory quarterly amortization payments of $3.8 million
payable on or prior to the last day of each March, June, September and December (starting with
December 31, 2010), with a final payment of the entire remaining balance of the Term Loan B on
its maturity date of July 18, 2016.
Also on July 16, 2010, FIS used a portion of the net proceeds of the Notes and the Term Loan B
to repay in full the outstanding amount under the Metavante Term Loan and subsequently terminated
the Metavante Credit Agreement. FIS intends to use the remaining net proceeds of the Notes and the
Term Loan B, together with other borrowings, to repurchase shares of common stock, and to pay fees
and expenses.
Dividend Declaration
On July 20, 2010 the Companys Board of Directors approved a regular
quarterly dividend of $0.05 per common share payable on September 30, 2010 to shareholders of
record as of the close of business September 16, 2010.
18
Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, all references to FIS, we, the
Company or the registrant are to Fidelity National Information Services, Inc., a Georgia
corporation, and its subsidiaries, and all references to Metavante are to Metavante Technologies,
Inc., and its subsidiaries, as acquired by FIS on October 1, 2009.
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with Item 1: Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements and the Notes thereto included elsewhere in this report. The discussion below
contains forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Statements
that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs and expectations, are
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on managements beliefs, as well
as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management. Because such statements
are based on expectations as to future economic performance and are not statements of fact, actual
results may differ materially from those projected. The risks and uncertainties that
forward-looking statements are subject to include, without limitation: changes in general economic,
business and political conditions, including changes in both domestic and international financial
markets; the effect of governmental regulations and/or changes in industry requirements; the
effects of our substantial leverage which may limit the funds available to make acquisitions and
invest in our business; the risks of reduction in revenue from the elimination of existing and
potential customers due to consolidation in the banking, retail and financial services industries
or due to financial failures suffered by firms in those industries; failures to adapt our services
to changes in technology or in the marketplace; the failure to achieve some or all of the benefits
that we expect from the acquisition of Metavante, including the possibility that our acquisition of
Metavante may not be accretive to our earnings due to undisclosed liabilities, management or
integration issues, loss of customers, the inability to achieve targeted cost savings, or other
factors; our potential inability to find suitable acquisition candidates or difficulties in
integrating acquisitions; competitive pressures on product pricing and services including the ability to attract
new or retain existing customers; an operational or natural disaster at one of our major operations centers, and other risks
detailed in the Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information, Risk Factors and other
sections of the Companys Form 10-K, this Form 10-Q and other filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. All forward-looking statements included in this document are based on
information available at the time the document was filed. FIS assumes no obligation to update any
forward-looking statement.
Overview
FIS, one of the worlds largest providers of banking and payments technology, delivers banking
and payments technologies to more than 14,000 financial institutions and businesses in over 100
countries worldwide. FIS provides financial institution core processing, and card issuer and
transaction processing services, including the NYCE® Network. FIS is a member of
Standard and Poors (S&P) 500® Index and consistently holds a leading ranking in the
annual FinTech 100 rankings. We have four reporting segments: Financial Solutions Group (FSG),
Payment Solutions Group (PSG), International Solutions Group (ISG) and Corporate and Other. A
description of these segments is included above in Note 11 to the Notes to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements (Unaudited). Revenues by segment and the results of operations of our segments
are discussed below in Segment Results of Operations.
Business Trends and Conditions
Approximately 85% of our revenue is derived from multi-year agreements and is considered
recurring, which provides relative stability to our revenue stream. However, the condition of the
overall economy can affect our revenue growth in a number of areas. A significant portion of our
revenue is derived from transaction processing fees. As a result, lower payment
transactions associated with reduced consumer and commercial activity will adversely impact
revenue. In addition, sales of software licenses and professional services, which represent
approximately 15% of our revenue, can be regarded as discretionary spending by our customers and
may contract when their capital budgets tighten. In light of the challenging revenue environment,
we are seeking to manage our costs and capital expenditures prudently.
We completed the Metavante Acquisition on October 1, 2009. The combined Company is positioned
to provide a comprehensive range of integrated solutions to its customers and has greater
geographic reach than others in the industry, which will enhance service to the combined Companys
customers. Management also expects to realize incremental cost and revenue synergies through 2011
as a result of the Metavante Acquisition.
As the payment market continues to evolve from paper-based to electronic, we continue to add
new services responsive to this trend. Card transactions continue to increase as a percentage of
total point-of-sale payments, which fuels continuing demand for card-related services. In recent
years, we have added a variety of stored-value card types, Internet banking, and electronic bill
presentment/payment services, as well as a number of card enhancement and loyalty/reward programs.
The common goal of these offerings continues to be convenience and security for the consumer
coupled with value to the financial institution. The evolution
19
to electronic transactions also intensifies the vulnerability to fraud, increasing the demand
for our risk management solutions. At the same time, the use of checks continues to decline as a
percentage of total point-of-sale payments, which negatively impacts our check warranty and
item-processing businesses.
We compete for both licensing and outsourcing business, and thus are affected by the decisions
of financial institutions to utilize our services under an outsourced arrangement or to process
in-house under a software license and maintenance agreement. As a provider of outsourcing
solutions, we benefit from multi-year recurring revenue streams, which help moderate the effects of
year to year economic changes on our results of operations. One of the current trends we expect to
benefit from in the financial services industry is the migration to an outsourced model to improve
profitability.
Consolidation within the banking industry may be beneficial or detrimental to our businesses.
When consolidations occur, merger partners often operate disparate systems licensed from or
outsourced to competing service providers. The newly formed entity generally makes a determination
to migrate its core and payments systems to a single platform. When a financial institution
processing client is involved in a consolidation, we may benefit by expanding the use of our
services if such services are chosen to survive the consolidation and support the newly combined
entity. Conversely, we may lose market share if a customer of ours is involved in a consolidation
and our services are not chosen to survive the consolidation and support the newly combined entity.
We seek to mitigate the risks of consolidations by offering other competitive services to take
advantage of specific opportunities at the surviving company.
We continue to see challenges for financial institutions and expect a continuation of bank
failures in the next few years, which may be offset to a degree by somewhat decreased bank
acquisition activity than is traditionally prevalent in the banking sector. Continuing or
escalating bank failures and forced government actions may negatively impact our business. This
exposure may potentially be mitigated by incremental revenues we may generate from license fees or
services associated with assisting surviving institutions integrate acquired assets resulting from
financial failures. Additionally, regulatory change for our clients may impact our operations.
While we believe that we are well positioned to withstand the current economic challenges,
there are factors outside our control that might impact our operating results that we may not be
able to fully anticipate as to timing and severity, including but not limited to adverse effects if
certain banks are nationalized, or if global economic conditions worsen, causing further slowdowns
in consumer spending and lending. Further, there could be an impact on our ability to access
capital should any of our lenders fail.
For an update on our Brazil card processing venture, see Note 7 to the Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).
On
July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act was enacted and
signed into law. This legislation was designed to improve supervision and regulation of financial firms and
financial markets, protect consumers and investors from financial and other abuses and provide federal
regulators with new tools to manage a financial crisis. The legislation also created the Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau (the Bureau) whose sole focus is to develop, implement and, with respect to financial
institutions with more than $10 billion in assets, enforce consumer protection rules promulgated by the
Bureau: for financial institutions with less than $10 billion in assets, enforcement of the rules will be
carried out by such institutions primary federal regulator.
With respect to our business, also included in the legislation are provisions for new rules and
regulations governing interchange fees and network fees arising from electronic debit card and reloadable
general-use gift card transactions. Under the legislation, the amount of interchange fees that issuers (with
more than $10 billion in assets) may charge must be reasonable and proportional to the cost incurred by
the issuer. Network fees are regulated to the extent that they are used to circumvent restrictions on
interchange fees or compensate issuers with respect to electronic debit card transactions. The legislation
also contemplates rules prohibiting issuers from restricting the processing of transactions to networks they
own or are affiliated with and from inhibiting
retailers abilities to route transactions to issuers over any
debit card network. These regulations are to be promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board and are expected
to take effect in the third quarter of 2011. The envisioned regulations do not appear to be intended to
directly affect interchange fees applicable to credit card transactions, but do prohibit networks from
inhibiting retailers from setting minimum purchase
amounts for use of credit cards as long as the
minimum does not discriminate among issuers or networks and the minimum is not greater than $10. Since
interchange fees are primarily a pass-through cost for FIS, the impact on our revenues is unclear at this
time. Moreover, since the regulations implementing the act have not yet been drafted, we are uncertain as
to what degree the legislation may affect our business in the future.
Critical Accounting Policies
Except for the revenue recognition change discussed in Note 2 to the Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), there have been no significant changes to our
critical accounting policies as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
Transactions with Related Parties
See Notes 3 and 7 to the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) for
a detailed description of transactions with related parties, including a description of possible
changes affecting our Brazilian venture.
20
Factors Affecting Comparability
As a result of the Metavante Acquisition described in Note 5 to the Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), the results of operations in the periods covered by
these statements may not be directly comparable.
21
Comparisons of three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
Consolidated Results of Operations (Unaudited)
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Processing and services revenues |
|
$ |
1,286.1 |
|
|
$ |
829.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,535.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,623.3 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
912.2 |
|
|
|
622.8 |
|
|
|
1,819.4 |
|
|
|
1,241.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
373.9 |
|
|
|
206.4 |
|
|
|
716.3 |
|
|
|
382.1 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses |
|
|
197.0 |
|
|
|
93.0 |
|
|
|
355.6 |
|
|
|
188.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
176.9 |
|
|
|
113.4 |
|
|
|
360.7 |
|
|
|
193.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(19.3 |
) |
|
|
(31.3 |
) |
|
|
(47.6 |
) |
|
|
(62.5 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
(12.6 |
) |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
(17.9 |
) |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
(31.9 |
) |
|
|
(25.8 |
) |
|
|
(65.5 |
) |
|
|
(55.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations before
income taxes |
|
|
145.0 |
|
|
|
87.6 |
|
|
|
295.2 |
|
|
|
137.4 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
53.6 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
109.2 |
|
|
|
47.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
|
91.4 |
|
|
|
57.5 |
|
|
|
186.0 |
|
|
|
90.2 |
|
Earnings (losses) from discontinued
operations, net of tax |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
91.1 |
|
|
|
59.6 |
|
|
|
184.6 |
|
|
|
92.3 |
|
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to FIS common stockholders |
|
$ |
89.9 |
|
|
$ |
59.2 |
|
|
$ |
183.5 |
|
|
$ |
92.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share basic from continuing
operations attributable to FIS common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
Net earnings (loss) per share basic from discontinued
operations attributable FIS common stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share basic attributable to FIS
common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic |
|
|
376.5 |
|
|
|
190.3 |
|
|
|
374.9 |
|
|
|
190.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share diluted from continuing
operations attributable to FIS common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
Net earnings per share diluted from discontinued
operations attributable to FIS common stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share diluted attributable to FIS
common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
384.6 |
|
|
|
192.7 |
|
|
|
382.3 |
|
|
|
192.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts attributable to FIS common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
90.2 |
|
|
$ |
57.1 |
|
|
$ |
184.9 |
|
|
$ |
90.1 |
|
Earnings (losses) from discontinued operations,
net of tax |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to FIS common
stockholders |
|
$ |
89.9 |
|
|
$ |
59.2 |
|
|
$ |
183.5 |
|
|
$ |
92.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Processing and Services Revenues
Processing and services revenues totaled $1,286.1 million and $829.2 million during the
three-month periods and $2,535.7 million and $1,623.3 million during the six-month periods ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increases in revenue of $456.9 million, or 55.1% during
the three-month period and $912.4 million or 56.2% during the six-month period ended June 30, 2010,
as compared to the 2009 periods are primarily attributable to incremental revenues from the
Metavante Acquisition. In addition to the Metavante Acquisition, increased demand for software and
professional services, higher debit and credit transaction volumes and favorable foreign currency
impact resulting from a weaker U.S. dollar increased revenues. These increases were partially
offset by declines in our paper-based retail check businesses.
22
Cost of Revenues and Gross Profit
Cost of revenues totaled $912.2 million and $622.8 million during the three-month periods and
$1,819.4 million and $1,241.2 million during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, resulting in gross profit of $373.9 million and $206.4 million for the three-month
periods and $716.3 million and $382.1 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively. Gross profit as a percentage of revenues (gross margin) was 29.1% and 24.9%
in the three-month periods and 28.2% and 23.5% in the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively. The increases in cost of revenues of $289.4 million during the three-month
period and $578.2 million in the six-month period ended June 30, 2010, as compared to the 2009
periods are directly attributable to the revenue variances addressed above. The increases in gross
margin of 420 basis points and 470 basis points during the three-month and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2010 as compared to the 2009 periods were driven by the continuing results from the
synergy initiatives associated with the Metavante Acquisition and the Companys continued effort to
reduce costs and improve operating efficiency.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses totaled $197.0 million and $93.0 million during
the three-month periods and $355.6 million and $188.9 million during the six-month periods ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increases of $104.0 million in the three-month period and
$166.7 million in the six-month period ended June 30, 2010, as compared to 2009 were primarily due
to incremental costs associated with the Metavante operations. Also, integration and merger
related charges, including severance costs, relocation and integration costs, synergy incentives
and facility and technology platform activity contributed $49.5 million and $54.1 million of the
increases during the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010, respectively.
Stock-based compensation during the six-month period ended June 30, 2010 included vesting
acceleration charges of $0.9 million due to change in control provisions triggered by the Metavante
Acquisition and subsequent terminations of employment and $4.5 million of expense for
merger-related grants.
Operating Income
Operating income totaled $176.9 million and $113.4 million during the three-month periods and
$360.7 million and $193.2 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. Operating income as a percentage of revenue (operating margin) was 13.8% and 13.7%
during the three-month periods and 14.2% and 11.9% during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010
and 2009, respectively. The increases in operating margin for the 2010 periods as compared to the
2009 periods were driven by synergies, cost containment initiatives and gross margin improvements
discussed above, partially offset by integration and merger related charges and additional stock
compensation charges incurred during the 2010 periods.
Total Other Income (Expense)
Total other income (expense) was ($31.9) million and ($25.8) million during the three-month
periods and ($65.5) million and ($55.8) million during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010
and 2009, respectively. The two primary components of total other income (expense) are interest
expense and, for the 2010 periods, costs relating to the leveraged recapitalization. The decreases
of $12.0 million and $14.9 million in interest expense during the three-month and six-month periods
ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the 2009 periods resulted from lower interest rates on our debt
due to the expiration of higher fixed interest rate swaps, partially offset by higher debt levels
in the 2010 periods. The three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 include $12.8
million of debt extinguishment expense relating to certain previously capitalized costs and fees
and other expenses relating to our leveraged recapitalization.
Provision for Income Taxes
Income tax expense from continuing operations totaled $53.6 million and $30.1 million during
the three-month periods and $109.2 million and $47.2 million during the six-month periods ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. This resulted in an effective tax rate on continuing
operations of 37.0% for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 34.4% for the
three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009. The net increase in the overall effective
tax rate is primarily related to a larger proportion of domestic pre-tax income versus
foreign-source income during the 2010 periods due primarily to the Metavante Acquisition, the
expiration of federal research and development tax credits and the expiration of certain interest
expense benefits for related foreign-controlled corporations.
23
Net Earnings from Continuing Operations Attributable to FIS Common Stockholders
Net earnings from continuing operations attributable to FIS common stockholders totaled $90.2
million and $57.1 million for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively,
or $0.23 and $0.30 per diluted share, respectively, due to the factors described above. Net
earnings from continuing operations attributable to FIS common stockholders totaled $184.9 million
and $90.1 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 respectively, or $0.48 and
$0.47 per diluted share, respectively, due to the factors described above.
Segment Results of Operations
Financial Solutions
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Processing and services revenues |
|
$ |
458.3 |
|
|
$ |
269.9 |
|
|
$ |
901.8 |
|
|
$ |
536.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
162.8 |
|
|
$ |
88.9 |
|
|
$ |
310.5 |
|
|
$ |
162.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues for FSG totaled $458.3 million and $269.9 million during the three-month periods and
$901.8 million and $536.2 million during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The overall segment increases of $188.4 million and $365.6 million during the
three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010, respectively, as compared to the 2009
periods primarily resulted from incremental Metavante revenues and increased demand for
professional services and software licenses during 2010 as compared to 2009.
Operating income for FSG totaled $162.8 million and $88.9 million during the three-month
periods and $310.5 million and $162.5 million during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively. Operating margin was approximately 35.5% and 32.9% during the three-month
periods and 34.4% and 30.3% during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The increases in operating income during the 2010 three-month and six-month periods
as compared to 2009 primarily resulted from incremental Metavante 2010 operating income. The
increases in operating margin during the 2010 three-month and six-month periods as compared to the
2009 periods are due to continuing results from the synergy initiatives associated with the
Metavante Acquisition.
Payment Solutions
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Processing and services revenues |
|
$ |
630.6 |
|
|
$ |
379.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,249.4 |
|
|
$ |
743.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
207.6 |
|
|
$ |
96.3 |
|
|
$ |
412.4 |
|
|
$ |
182.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues for PSG totaled $630.6 million and $379.2 million during the three-month periods and
$1,249.4 million and $743.5 million during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The overall segment increases of $251.4 million and $505.9 million during the
three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010, respectively, as compared to the 2009
periods resulted primarily from incremental Metavante 2010 revenues. Additionally, increased debit
and credit transaction volumes increased revenue and were partially offset by lower item processing
and retail check activity.
Operating income for PSG totaled $207.6 million and $96.3 million during the three-month
periods and $412.4 million and $182.1 million during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively. Operating margins were approximately 32.9% and 25.4% during the three-month
periods and 33.0% and 24.5% during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The increases in operating income and operating margin during the three-month and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the 2009 periods primarily resulted from
incremental Metavante 2010 operating income, realized cost savings and improved profitability
within our retail check business.
24
International
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Processing and services revenues |
|
$ |
200.7 |
|
|
$ |
180.7 |
|
|
$ |
395.7 |
|
|
$ |
344.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
21.4 |
|
|
$ |
19.8 |
|
|
$ |
37.6 |
|
|
$ |
34.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues for ISG totaled $200.7 million and $180.7 million during the three-month periods and
$395.7 million and $344.7 million during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The overall segment increases of $20.0 million and $51.0 million during the
three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010, respectively, as compared to 2009 periods
resulted primarily from a $9.2 million and $33.4 million favorable foreign currency impact
resulting from a weaker U.S. dollar during the respective 2010 three-month and six-month periods.
For the June 2010 quarter, incremental revenues from Metavante and increasing revenues in our
Brazilian Venture contributed significantly to the remainder of the increase in revenues. The
majority of the increase during the 2010 six-month period was due to incremental 2010 revenues from
Metavante.
Operating income for ISG totaled $21.4 million and $19.8 million for the three-month periods
and $37.6 million and $34.4 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. Operating margins were approximately 10.7% and 11.0% for the three-month periods and
9.5% and 10.0% for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The decreases
in operating margin in 2010 as compared to 2009 primarily result from a less favorable revenue mix.
Corporate and Other
The Corporate and Other segment results consist of selling, general and administrative
expenses and depreciation and intangible asset amortization not otherwise allocated to the
reporting segments. Corporate and Other expenses were $214.9 million and $91.6 million during the
three-month periods and $399.8 million and $185.8 million during the six-month periods ended June
30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The overall Corporate and Other increases of $123.3 million and
$214.0 during the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 as compared to 2009 were
primarily due to the incremental costs associated with the Metavante operations and the merger
related charges, as addressed above under total Company Selling, General and Administrative
Expense.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Requirements
Our cash requirements include cost of revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses,
income taxes, debt service payments and capital expenditures, and may include stockholder
dividends, discretionary share repurchases and business acquisitions. Our principal sources of
funds are cash generated by operations and borrowings. In addition to our customary cash
requirements, the Company announced a leveraged recapitalization plan on May 25, 2010, as more
fully discussed below under Financing. The plan includes a tender offer of up to $2.5 billion of
common stock, to be funded by a combination of incremental debt and the amendment and extension of
existing credit facilities.
At June 30, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of $502.0 million and debt of
$2,960.9 million, including the current portion. Of the $502.0 million cash and cash equivalents,
approximately $304.7 million is held by our operations in foreign jurisdictions. We expect that
cash flows from operations over the next twelve months will be sufficient to fund our operating
cash requirements and pay principal and interest on our outstanding debt.
We currently pay a $0.05 per common share dividend on a quarterly basis. The declaration and
payment of future dividends is at the discretion of the Board of Directors and depends on, among
other things, our investment policy and opportunities, results of operations, financial condition,
cash requirements, future prospects, and other factors that may be considered relevant by our Board
of Directors, including legal and contractual restrictions. Additionally, the payment of cash
dividends may be limited by covenants in certain debt agreements. A regular quarterly dividend of
$0.05 per common share was paid on June 30, 2010 to shareholders of record as of the close of
business on June 16, 2010. On July 20, 2010 the Companys Board of Directors approved a regular
quarterly dividend of $0.05 per common share payable on September 30, 2010 to shareholders of
record as of the close of business September 16, 2010.
25
Cash Flows from Operations
Cash flows from operations were $445.2 million and $331.1 million during the six-month periods
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 respectively. Cash flows from operations increased by $114.1 million
due primarily to the incremental earnings provided by the Metavante Acquisition in the 2010 period.
Capital Expenditures
Our principal capital expenditures are for computer software (purchased and internally
developed) and additions to property and equipment. We spent approximately $134.2 million and
$96.2 million on capital expenditures during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. We expect to spend approximately 6% of 2010 revenue on capital expenditures including
capital expenditures related to the integration of Metavante.
Financing
On January 18, 2007, FIS entered into a syndicated credit agreement, which was amended on July
30, 2007, and amended and restated on June 29, 2010 (as amended, the FIS Credit Agreement). The
FIS Credit Agreement, as of June 30, 2010, provides total committed capital of $3,426.0 million
comprised of: (1) revolving credit facilities in an aggregate maximum principal amount of $1,033.7
million (together, the Revolving Loan), consisting of $112.3 million in revolving credit capacity
maturing on January 18, 2012 and $921.4 million in revolving credit capacity maturing on July 18,
2014; (2) an aggregate of $2,390.4 million of term notes (the Term Loan A) consisting of $386.8
million maturing on January 18, 2012 (Term Loan A-1) and $2,003.6 million maturing on July 18,
2014 (Term Loan A-2) and (3) an aggregate of $1.9 million of term notes (the LCPI Loans)
maturing on July 18, 2014. The Revolving Loan is bifurcated into tranches based upon the currency
in which borrowings may be made: (a) a $225.1 million tranche that allows borrowings in U.S.
dollars only; and (b) an $808.6 million multicurrency tranche that allows borrowings in U.S.
dollars, Euros, British Pounds Sterling, and Australian dollars. The multicurrency tranche of the
Revolving Loan includes an aggregate sublimit of $250.0 million for swing line loans and an
aggregate sublimit of $250.0 million for the issuance of letters of credit. As of June 30, 2010,
the outstanding principal balance of the Revolving Loan was $308.9 million, with $724.8 million of
borrowing capacity remaining thereunder. In addition to committed loans, the FIS Credit Agreement
contains provisions permitting FIS to obtain certain additional loans in the future, conditioned
upon, among other things, FIS ability to obtain additional commitments from lenders to fund such
loans and compliance with certain financial covenants, including (1) the New Term Loan B (discussed
below); and (2) up to an additional $750 million in the aggregate of term and revolving credit
loans. The FIS Credit Agreement is, as of June 30, 2010, guaranteed by substantially all of FIS
domestic subsidiaries (but specifically excluding the SPV, as defined below) and secured by a
pledge of (x) all of FIS (and the guarantors) holdings of capital stock of domestic entities
(subject to certain exceptions), other than the capital stock issued by any subsidiary of
Metavante; and (y) 65% of FIS (and the guarantors) holdings of capital stock of certain foreign
entities.
In addition to the maturity extension and increased debt authorizations noted above, the
amendment and extension, among other things, (1) modified certain covenants to permit the issuance
of the Notes (described below) and the Self-Tender Offer (also described below); (2) made certain
other modifications to financial and other covenants, including to increase our maximum leverage
ratio following the consummation of the Notes, the Term Loan B and the Self-Tender Offer, reduce
leverage ratio triggers for the excess cash flow sweep and permit additional unsecured indebtedness
without specific dollar limit (subject to compliance with certain financial covenants); (3) exempts
securitization vehicles from guaranty requirements; and (4) changed pricing.
On November 1, 2007, Metavante entered into a syndicated credit agreement, which was amended
on October 1, 2009 (as amended, the Metavante Credit Agreement). The Metavante Credit Agreement,
as of June 30, 2010, provided total committed capital of $230.0 million consisting of term notes
maturing on November 1, 2014 (the Metavante Term Loan). On July 16, 2010, FIS repaid in full the
outstanding amount under the Metavante Term Loan and terminated that credit facility.
On October 1, 2009, FIS entered into an agreement for FIS and certain of its domestic
subsidiaries to sell certain of their accounts receivable (the AR Facility) to a wholly-owned
special purpose accounts receivable securitization entity (the SPV), which is exclusively engaged
in purchasing accounts receivable from FIS and certain of its domestic subsidiaries. The SPV funds
its purchases, in part, by selling interests in the accounts receivable to a syndicate of financial
institution purchasers in exchange for up to $145.0 million in capital funding (provided, however,
that if FIS obtains additional commitments from new or existing purchasers, the aggregate amount
may be increased by up to an additional $55.0 million, to an overall aggregate capital amount of
$200.0 million). The sales to the purchasers do not qualify for sale treatment as FIS maintains
effective control over the accounts receivable that are sold. Thus, the SPV is included in FIS
consolidated financial statements. The AR Facility was amended on
26
June 30, 2010, primarily to make conforming changes in regard to the amendment and extension
of the FIS Credit Agreement. As of June 30, 2010, there was no outstanding capital under the AR
Facility, with $145 million of available capital thereunder.
FIS may borrow, repay and re-borrow amounts under the Revolving Loan from time to time until
the applicable maturities of the tranches included in the Revolving Loan. There are no mandatory
principal payments on the LCPI Loans until the outstanding principal balance is payable in full at
maturity. FIS must make quarterly principal payments under that portion of the Term Loan A that
matures in 2012 of $11.3 million per quarter from September 30, 2010 through September 30, 2011,
with the remaining principal balance payable on January 18, 2012. FIS must make quarterly principal
payments under that portion of the Term Loan A that matures in 2014 of $50.1 million per quarter
from September 30, 2010 through December 31, 2012, and $75.1 million per quarter from March 31,
2013 through March 31, 2014, with the remaining principal balance payable on July 18, 2014.
The following table summarizes the mandatory annual principal payments with respect to the
Term Loan A pursuant to the FIS Credit Agreement and with respect to the Metavante Term Loan
pursuant to Metavante Credit Agreement as of June 30, 2010 (in millions). There are no mandatory
principal payments on the Revolving Loan; any balance outstanding on the Revolving Loan will be due
and payable at the applicable scheduled maturity date of the respective tranches thereof:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metavante |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term Loan A-1 |
|
|
Term Loan A-2 |
|
|
Term Loan (1) |
|
|
Total |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
24.1 |
|
|
$ |
100.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
124.3 |
|
2011 |
|
|
34.0 |
|
|
|
200.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234.4 |
|
2012 |
|
|
328.7 |
|
|
|
200.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
529.1 |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
300.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300.5 |
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,202.1 |
|
|
|
230.0 |
|
|
|
1,432.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
386.8 |
|
|
$ |
2,003.6 |
|
|
$ |
230.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,620.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On July 16, 2010, FIS repaid in full the outstanding amount under the Metavante Term Loan and
terminated that credit facility. |
The FIS Credit Agreement, Metavante Credit Agreement, and AR Facility are subject to customary
affirmative, negative and financial covenants, including, among other things, limits on the
creation of liens, limits on the incurrence of indebtedness, restrictions on investments and
dispositions, limitations on dividends and other restricted payments, a minimum interest coverage
ratio and a maximum leverage ratio.
We monitor the financial stability of our counterparties on an ongoing basis. The lender
commitments under the undrawn portions of the Revolving Loan and AR Facility are comprised of a
diversified set of financial institutions, both domestic and international. The combined
commitments of our top 10 lenders comprise about 69% of our Revolving Loan and AR Facility. The
failure of any single lender to perform their obligations under the Revolving Loan and/or the AR
Facility would not adversely impact our ability to fund operations. If the single largest lender
were to simultaneously default under the terms of both the FIS Credit Agreement (impacting the
capacity of the Revolving Loan) and the AR Facility, the maximum loss of available capacity on the
undrawn portion of these agreements would be about $125.0 million. As of June 30, 2010, the
combined undrawn capacity of the Revolving Loan and the AR Facility was $869.8 million.
As of June 30, 2010, we have entered into interest rate swap transactions converting a portion
of the interest rate exposure on our Term and Revolving Loans from variable to fixed (see Item 3
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risks).
On July 16, 2010, we completed offerings of $600.0 million aggregate principal amount of
7.625% Senior Notes due 2017 (the 2017 Notes) and $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of
7.875% Senior Notes due 2020 (the 2020 Notes and together with the 2017 Notes, the Notes). FIS
issued the Notes in two separate series under an indenture dated as of July 16, 2010 among FIS,
FIS domestic subsidiaries that guaranteed its amended credit facility (the Guarantors) and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. The Notes were offered and sold in the
United States to qualified institutional buyers in reliance on Rule 144A under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and outside the United States to non-U.S. persons in
reliance on Regulation S under the Securities Act. The Notes have not been registered under the
Securities Act and may not be offered or sold without registration unless pursuant to an exemption
from, or in a transaction not subject to, the registration requirements of the Securities Act and
all applicable state laws. We have agreed to exchange each series of the Notes for a new issue of
substantially identical notes registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as soon as practicable but in no event later than 360 days after the July 16, 2010, closing.
27
Interest on the 2017 Notes accrues at the rate of 7.625% per annum, and interest on the 2020
Notes accrues at the rate of 7.875% per annum. Interest on each series of Notes is payable
semi-annually on January 15 and July 15 of each year, commencing on January 15, 2011. The Notes
are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by each of the Guarantors.
FIS may redeem some or all of the 2017 Notes and the 2020 Notes before July 15, 2013 and July
15, 2014, respectively, by paying a make-whole premium. FIS may redeem some or all of the 2017
Notes and the 2020 Notes on or after July 15, 2013 and July 15, 2014, respectively, at specified
redemption prices. In addition, before July 15, 2013, FIS may redeem up to 35% of the Notes with
the net proceeds of certain equity offerings.
FIS is obligated to offer to repurchase the Notes at a price of (a) 101% of their principal
amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, as a result of certain change of control events
and (b) 100% of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, in the event of
certain asset sales. These restrictions and prohibitions are subject to certain qualifications and
exceptions.
The indenture contains covenants that, among other things, limit FIS ability and the ability
of certain of FIS subsidiaries (a) to incur or guarantee additional indebtedness, (b) to make
certain dividends or other restricted payments, (c) to create or incur certain liens, (d) to create
restrictions on the payment of dividends or other distributions to FIS from its restricted
subsidiaries, (e) to engage in sale and leaseback transactions, (f) to transfer all or
substantially all of the assets of FIS or any restricted subsidiary or enter into merger or
consolidation transactions and (g) to engage in certain transactions with affiliates. These
covenants are subject to a number of exceptions, limitations and qualifications in the indenture.
On July 16, 2010, FIS, entered into a Joinder Agreement (the Joinder Agreement), under which
FIS issued a new tranche of term loans under the FIS Credit Agreement in an aggregate principal
amount of $1.5 billion (the Term Loan B). The Term Loan B is subject in all material respects to
the provisions of the FIS Credit Agreement applicable to other term loans under the FIS Credit
Agreement. Interest on the Term Loan B will be generally payable at LIBOR plus 3.75% per annum
(with LIBOR subject to a floor of 1.50%). The Term Loan B is subject to mandatory quarterly
amortization payments of $3.8 million payable on or prior to the last day of each March, June,
September and December (starting with December 31, 2010), with a final payment of the entire
remaining balance of the Term Loan B on its maturity date of July 18, 2016.
Also on July 16, 2010, FIS used a portion of the net proceeds of the Notes and the Term Loan B
to repay in full the outstanding amount under the Metavante Term Loan and terminated that credit
facility. FIS intends to use the remaining net proceeds of the Notes and the Term Loan B, after
giving effect to the payoff of the Metavante Term Loan, together with other borrowings, to
repurchase shares of common stock, and to pay fees and expenses.
The following table summarizes on a pro forma basis our long-term debt as if the transactions for
the Term Loan B, the Notes and repayment of the Metavante Term Loan were completed as of June 30,
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
Term Loan A-1 |
|
$ |
386.8 |
|
Term Loan A-2 |
|
|
2,003.6 |
|
Term Loan B |
|
|
1,500.0 |
|
Revolving Loan |
|
|
556.0 |
|
The Notes |
|
|
1,100.0 |
|
AR Facility |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
32.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, excluding current portion |
|
$ |
5,579.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
On May 25, 2010, FIS announced that its Board of Directors had authorized a leveraged
recapitalization plan pursuant to which the Company will repurchase up to $2.5 billion of its
common stock at a price range of between $29.00 $31.00 per share of common stock through a
modified Dutch auction tender offer (the Self Tender Offer). Under this offer, FIS
shareholders may tender all or a portion of their common shares within the designated price range.
Based on the number of shares tendered and the prices specified by the tendering shareholders, the
Company will determine the lowest price per share within the range at which the Company can
purchase up to $2.5 billion of its common stock or such lesser number of shares as are properly
tendered. The Company further announced its intention to effect the proposed recapitalization by
incurring approximately $2.5 billion of
28
incremental debt in the form of the Term Loan B, the Notes and the amendment and extension of
its existing credit facilities discussed above.
Contractual Obligations
Our contractual obligations have not changed materially from the table included in our Form
10-K as filed on February 26, 2010, except for those relating to our long-term debt as discussed in
Notes 8 and 12 to Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) and noted above
under Financing.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
FIS does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
As discussed in Note 2 to Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited),
the FASB amended ASC Subtopic 605-25, Revenue RecognitionMultiple-Element Arrangements, in
October 2009 and the Company elected early adoption of this guidance prospectively as of January 1,
2010. The current and expected future effects of this change are also addressed therein.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risks
Market Risk
We are exposed to market risks primarily from changes in interest rates and foreign currency
exchange rates. We use certain derivative financial instruments, including interest rate swaps, to
manage interest rate risk. We do not use derivatives for trading purposes, to generate income or to
engage in speculative activity.
Interest Rate Risk
At the present time, our only material market risk-sensitive instruments are our debt and
related interest rate swaps. We have issued debt that bears interest at floating rates. We use
interest rate swaps for the purpose of managing our interest expense through the mix of fixed and
floating rate debt. We manage interest rate sensitivity by measuring potential increases in
interest expense that would result from a probable change in interest rates. When the potential
increase in interest expense exceeds an acceptable amount, we reduce risk through the purchase of
derivatives.
As of June 30, 2010, we are paying interest on our Term Loan A-1 of LIBOR plus 0.75%, on our
Term Loan A-2 of LIBOR plus an applicable margin of up to 2.5% based upon the Companys leverage
ratio, as defined in the amended and extended credit agreement and on our Metavante Term Loan at
LIBOR plus 3.25%. Prior to the June 29, 2010 amendment and extension, interest on the Revolving
Loan was payable at LIBOR plus up to 1.00% (Eurocurrency Borrowings), Fed-funds plus up to 1.00%
(Swingline Borrowings) or Prime plus 0.00% (Base Rate Borrowings) plus a facility fee of up to
0.25%. The pre-amendment pricing continues to apply for the portion of the Revolving Loan that
matures in January 2012, consisting of approximately $112.3 million of commitments. Interest on
the portion of the Revolving Loan that matures in July 2014 is generally payable at LIBOR plus an
applicable margin of up to 2.5%, based upon the Companys leverage ratio, and is subject to an
unused commitment fee of 0.50%. An increase of 100 basis points in the LIBOR rate would increase
our annual debt service under these credit agreements, after we include the impact of our interest
rate swaps, by $8.6 million (based on principal amounts outstanding at June 30, 2010). We performed
the foregoing sensitivity analysis based on the principal amount of our floating rate debt as of
June 30, 2010, less the principal amount of such debt that was then subject to an interest rate
swap converting such debt into fixed rate debt. This sensitivity analysis is based solely on the
principal amount of such debt as of June 30, 2010 and does not take into account any changes that
occurred in the prior 12 months or that may take place in the next 12 months in the amount of our
outstanding debt or in the notional amount of outstanding interest rate swaps in respect of our
debt. Further, in this sensitivity analysis, the change in interest rates is assumed to be
applicable for an entire year. For comparison purposes, based on principal amounts on the Revolving
Loan and Term Loan A outstanding as of June 30, 2009, and calculated in the same manner as set
forth above, an increase of 100 basis points in the LIBOR rate would have increased our annual
interest expense, after we include the impact of our interest rate swaps, by $1.9 million.
As of June 30, 2010, we have entered into the following interest rate swap transactions
converting a portion of the interest rate exposure on our Term and Revolving Loans from floating to
fixed (in millions):
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank Pays |
|
FIS pays |
Effective Date |
|
Termination Date |
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
Variable Rate of |
|
Fixed Rate of |
April 12, 2010 |
|
April 11, 2011 |
|
$ |
200.0 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR (4) |
|
|
0.76 |
%(5) |
October 20, 2009 |
|
April 20, 2011 |
|
|
700.0 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR (4) |
|
|
0.99 |
%(5) |
February 1, 2010 |
|
May 1, 2011 |
|
|
250.0 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR (4) |
|
|
0.75 |
%(5) |
February 1, 2010 |
|
May 1, 2011 |
|
|
150.0 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR (4) |
|
|
0.74 |
%(5) |
December 11, 2009 |
|
June 13, 2011 |
|
|
200.0 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR (4) |
|
|
0.91 |
%(5) |
February 1, 2008 |
|
February 1, 2012 |
|
|
400.0 |
(1) |
|
3 Month LIBOR (2) |
|
|
3.87 |
%(3) |
February 1, 2008 |
|
February 1, 2012 |
|
|
200.0 |
|
|
3 Month LIBOR (2) |
|
|
3.44 |
%(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Notional value amortized from $600.0 million to $400.0 million on
February 1, 2010 and will amortize from $400.0 million to $200.0
million on February 1, 2011. |
|
(2) |
|
0.53% in effect at June 30, 2010. |
|
(3) |
|
In addition to the fixed rates paid under the swaps, we currently pay
an applicable margin of 3.25%. These swaps were acquired in the
Metavante Acquisition. While the payments are fixed, interest expense
associated with these swaps is recorded based on the floating rate
curve established as of the acquisition date. |
|
(4) |
|
0.35% in effect at June 30, 2010. |
|
(5) |
|
Does not include the applicable margin and facility fees paid to bank
lenders on Term Loan A and Revolving Loan as described above. |
We have designated these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges. A portion of the amount
included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings is reclassified into interest expense as a
yield adjustment as interest payments are made on the Term and Revolving Loans. In accordance with
the authoritative guidance for fair value measurements, the inputs used to determine the estimated
fair value of our interest rate swaps are Level 2-type measurements. We considered our own credit
risk and the credit risk of the counterparties when determining the fair value of our interest rate
swaps.
Foreign Currency Risk
Our exposure to foreign currency exchange risks generally arises from our non-U.S. operations,
to the extent they are conducted in local currency. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates
affect translations of revenues denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars. Our
international operations generated approximately $200.7 million and $395.7 million in revenues
during the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010, of which approximately $165.1
million and $327.2 million, respectively were denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar.
The major currencies to which we are exposed are the Brazilian Real, the Euro and the British Pound
Sterling. A 10% move in average exchange rates for these currencies (assuming a simultaneous and
immediate 10% change in all of such rates for the relevant period) would have had the following
increase or decrease in our reported revenues for the three-month and six month periods ended June
30, 2010 and 2009 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
Currency |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Real |
|
$ |
7.9 |
|
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
|
$ |
15.6 |
|
|
$ |
11.7 |
|
Euro |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
Pound Sterling |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Impact |
|
$ |
14.1 |
|
|
$ |
12.7 |
|
|
$ |
28.2 |
|
|
$ |
24.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The impact on earnings of the foregoing assumed 10% change in each of the periods presented
would not have been significant.
Our foreign exchange risk management policy permits the use of derivative instruments, such as
forward contracts and options, to reduce volatility in our results of operations and/or cash flows
resulting from foreign exchange rate fluctuations. Our international operations revenues and
expenses are generally denominated in local currency which limits the economic exposure
to foreign exchange risk in those jurisdictions. We do not enter into foreign currency
derivative instruments for trading purposes. At June 30, 2010, we had no foreign currency
derivative instruments outstanding.
30
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal
financial officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure
that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Act
is: (a) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the
Commissions rules and forms; and (b) accumulated and communicated to management, including our
principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Part II: OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
See discussion of Litigation in Note 9 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
included in Item 1 of Part I of this Report, which is incorporated by reference into this Part II,
Item 1.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The following Risk Factors represent modifications or additions to the Risk Factors described
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Our existing levels of leverage and debt service requirements may adversely affect our financial
and operational flexibility.
After completion of the July 16, 2010 offerings of the Notes and issuance of Term Loan B as
discussed above under Financing, we have total debt of approximately $5.6 billion. This level of
debt could have adverse consequences for our business, financial condition, operating results and
operational flexibility, including the following: (i) the debt level may cause us to have
difficulty borrowing money in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or
other purposes; (ii) limiting operational flexibility and our ability to pursue other business
opportunities and implement certain business strategies; (iii) we use a large portion of our
operating cash flow to pay principal and interest on our senior credit facilities, which reduces
the amount of money available to finance operations, acquisitions and other business activities,
repay other indebtedness, purchase our outstanding stock and pay shareholder dividends; (iv) some
of our debt has a variable rate of interest, which exposes us to the risk of increased interest
rates; and (v) we have a higher level of debt than some of our competitors or potential
competitors, which may cause a competitive disadvantage and may reduce flexibility in responding to
changing business and economic conditions, including increased competition.
Lack of system integrity, fraudulent payments, credit quality related to funds settlement or the
availability of clearing services could result in a financial loss.
We settle funds on behalf of financial institutions, other businesses and consumers and
receive funds from clients, card issuers, payment networks and consumers on a daily basis for a
variety of transaction types. Transactions facilitated by us include debit card, credit card,
electronic bill payment transactions, Automated Clearing House (ACH) payments and check clearing
that supports consumers, financial institutions and other businesses. These payment activities rely
upon the technology infrastructure that facilitates the verification of activity with
counterparties, the facilitation of the payment as well as the detection or prevention of
fraudulent payments. If the continuity of operations, integrity of processing, or ability to detect
or prevent fraudulent payments were compromised this could result in a financial loss to us. In
addition, we rely on various financial institutions to provide ACH services in support of funds
settlement for certain of our products. If we are unable to obtain such ACH services in the future,
that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of
operations. In addition, we may issue credit to consumers, financial institutions or other
businesses as part of the funds settlement. A default on this credit by a counterparty could result
in a financial loss to us.
31
Global economic, political and other conditions may adversely affect trends in consumer spending,
which may adversely impact our revenue and profitability.
The global transaction processing industries depend heavily upon the overall level of
consumer, business and government spending. A sustained deterioration in general economic
conditions or consumer confidence, particularly in the United States, or increases in interest
rates in key countries in which we operate may adversely affect our financial performance by
reducing the number or average purchase amount of transactions which we service.
Failure to obtain new clients or renew client contracts on favorable terms could result in a lower
number or loss of clients and adversely affect results of operations and financial condition.
We may face pricing pressure in obtaining and retaining our larger clients. Larger clients
may be able to seek price reductions from us when they renew a contract, when a contract is
extended, when service or performance issues arise with the client, or when the clients business
has significant volume changes. On some occasions, this pricing pressure results in lower revenue
from a client than we had anticipated based on our previous agreement with that client. This
reduction in revenue could result in an adverse effect on our business, operating results and
financial condition.
Further, failure to effect renewal of client contracts on favorable terms could have an
adverse effect on our business. Our contracts with customers generally run for several years and
provide for early termination fees. Terms are generally renegotiated prior to the end of a
contracts term. If we are not successful in achieving a high rate of contract renewals on
favorable terms, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Changes in card association and debit network fees or products could increase costs or otherwise
limit our operations.
From time to time, card associations and debit networks increase the interchange fees that
they charge. It is possible that competitive pressures will result in our absorption of a portion
of such increases in the future, which would increase our operating costs, reduce our profit margin
and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operation. Furthermore, the
rules and regulations of the various card associations and networks prescribe certain capital
requirements. Any increase in the capital level required would further limit our use of capital
for other purposes.
Changes in the network pricing and transaction routing strategies of the NYCE Network could
adversely affect our results of operations.
The transaction volume and the corresponding revenues of NYCE, our subsidiary, are driven in
large measure by NYCEs execution of long-term strategies for network pricing (including
interchange and network fees) and transaction routing. As the debit and electronic payments
marketplace continues to shift and mature, it may be necessary for NYCE to pursue alternate pricing
and/or transaction routing strategies. Any significant changes to NYCEs current pricing and/or
transaction routing strategies would likely be implemented over a transitional phase. Such changes
could result in reductions of participant card base, reductions in merchant acceptance, and the
potential for transaction misrouting during the transitional phase, any of which would adversely
affect NYCEs revenue and our results of operations.
Our agreements with related parties may be more or less favorable than agreements negotiated at
arms-length with independent parties.
We have entered into various agreements with certain related parties, including, without
limitation, FNF, Ceridian Corporation, Banco Bradesco, S.A., and Banco Santander Spain, pursuant to
which we will provide services to each such related party as a client. We believe the amounts
earned from or charged by us under each such arrangement is fair and reasonable, and that our
service arrangements are priced within the range of prices we offer to third parties; however, the
amounts we earned or that were charged under these arrangements were not negotiated at
arms-length, and may not represent the terms that we might have obtained from an unrelated third
party for similar services. Any inferior terms that such agreements may contain as compared to
agreements negotiated with unrelated third parties may have an adverse impact on our results of
operations.
32
Many of our customers are subject to a regulatory environment and to industry standards that may
change in a manner that reduces the number of transactions in which our customers engage and
therefore reduces our revenues.
Our customers are subject to a number of government regulations and industry standards with
which our services must comply. Our customers must ensure that our services and related products
work within the extensive and evolving regulatory and industry requirements applicable to them.
Federal, state, foreign or industry authorities could adopt laws, rules or regulations affecting
our customers businesses that could lead to increased operating costs and could reduce the
convenience and functionality of our products and services possibly resulting in reduced market
acceptance. In particular, the recently enacted Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
may have an adverse effect on our customers and therefore could have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, action by regulatory authorities relating to credit availability, data usage,
privacy, or other related regulatory developments could have an adverse effect on our customers and
therefore could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of
operations.
We are subject to government regulation in our check business and debt collections business. Our
failure to comply with such regulations, changes to such regulations or governmental or private
legal actions related to such regulations may have an adverse effect on our business.
Our retail check authorization services (Certegy Check Services) and account opening services
(ChexSystems) maintain databases of consumer information and, as a consequence, are subject to the
Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act and similar state laws. Among other things, the Fair Credit
Reporting Act imposes requirements on us concerning data accuracy, and provides that consumers have
the right to know the contents of their files, to dispute their accuracy, and to require
verification or removal of disputed information. Our collection services are subject to the
Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and various state collection laws and licensing
requirements. The Federal Trade Commission, as well as state attorneys general and other agencies,
have enforcement responsibility over the collection laws, as well as the various credit reporting
laws. In addition, both the Fair Credit Reporting Act and Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices
Act afford individuals a private right of action that can be pursued in federal or state courts.
In either business, our failure to comply with the applicable regulations, any change in such
regulations, or legal actions by private individuals under such regulations could result in
substantial regulatory compliance costs, litigation expense, adverse publicity and/or loss of
revenue, which may have an adverse effect on our business.
Security breaches or our own failure to comply with privacy regulations and industry security
requirements imposed on providers of services to financial institutions and card processing
services could harm our business by disrupting our delivery of services and damaging our
reputation.
As part of our business, we electronically receive, process, store and transmit sensitive
business information of our customers. In addition, we collect personal consumer data, such as
names and addresses, social security numbers, drivers license numbers, cardholder data and payment
history records. The uninterrupted operation of our information systems and the confidentiality of
the customer/consumer information that resides on such systems are critical to our successful
operation. We have security, backup and recovery systems in place, a business continuity plan
designed and intended to ensure that our systems are not inoperable, and what we deem sufficient
security around the system to prevent unauthorized access; however, unauthorized access to our
computer systems or databases could result in the theft or publication of confidential information,
the deletion or modification of records or could otherwise cause interruptions in our operations.
These risks are increased when we transmit information over the Internet.
Additionally, as a provider of services to financial institutions and card processing
services, we are bound by the same limitations on disclosure of the information we receive from our
customers as apply to the customers themselves. If we fail to comply with these regulations and
industry security requirements, we could be exposed to suits for breach of contract, governmental
proceedings or the imposition of fines, or prohibitions on card processing services. In addition,
if more restrictive privacy laws, rules or industry security requirements are adopted in the future
on the federal or state level or by a specific industry body, they could have an adverse impact on
us through increased costs or restrictions on business processes. Any inability to prevent
security or privacy breaches could cause our existing customers to lose confidence in our systems
and terminate their agreements with us, and could inhibit our ability to attract new customers
and/or adversely impact our relationship with administrative agencies.
33
We are the subject of various legal proceedings that could have a material adverse effect on our
revenue and profitability.
We are routinely involved in various litigation matters, and also are involved in or the
subject of governmental or regulatory agency inquiries or investigations from time to time. If we
are unsuccessful in our defense in the litigation matters, or any other legal proceeding, we may be
forced to pay damages or fines and/or change its business practices, any of which could have a
material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Unfavorable resolution of tax contingencies could adversely affect our tax expense.
Our tax returns and positions are subject to review and audit by federal, state, local and
international taxing authorities. An unfavorable outcome to a tax audit could result in higher tax
expense, and could negatively impact our effective tax rate, financial position, results of
operations and cash flows in the current and/or future periods.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
In connection with the purchase right agreement with WPM, L.P. (WPM), a Delaware limited
partnership affiliated with Warburg Pincus Private Equity IX, L.P, referenced in Note 5 to the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this Report, on March
22, 2010 WPM purchased 498,054 shares of FIS common stock for a nominal amount ($4,981 under the
net settlement feature in the agreement). An additional 20,445 shares of FIS common stock were
purchased for a nominal amount on June 14, 2010. The shares of FIS common stock were issued and
sold in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities
Act of 1933.
On February 4, 2010 our Board of Directors approved a plan authorizing repurchases of up to
15.0 million shares of our common stock in the open market, at prevailing market prices or in
privately negotiated transactions, through January 31, 2013. We repurchased 1.4 million shares of
our common stock for $32.2 million, at an average price of $22.97 through March 31, 2010. No
shares were repurchased during the three months ended June 30, 2010. Approximately, 13.6 million
shares of our common stock remain available to repurchase under this plan.
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits:
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
31.1
|
|
Certification of Frank R. Martire, Chief Executive Officer of
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc., pursuant to rule
13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Michael D. Hayford, Chief Financial Officer of
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc., pursuant to rule
13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Frank R. Martire, Chief Executive Officer of
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc., pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Michael D. Hayford, Chief Financial Officer of
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc., pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
34
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 4, 2010 |
FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ MICHAEL D. HAYFORD
|
|
|
|
Michael D. Hayford |
|
|
|
Corporate Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Duly Authorized Officer) |
|
|
Date: August 4, 2010 |
FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ JAMES W. WOODALL
|
|
|
|
James W. Woodall |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer and Duly Authorized Officer) |
|
35
FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
FORM 10-Q
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The following documents are being filed with this Report:
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
31.1
|
|
Certification of Frank R. Martire, Chief Executive Officer of Fidelity National
Information Services, Inc., pursuant to rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Exchange
Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Michael D. Hayford, Chief Financial Officer of Fidelity National
Information Services, Inc., pursuant to rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Exchange
Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Frank R. Martire, Chief Executive Officer of Fidelity National
Information Services, Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Michael D. Hayford, Chief Financial Officer of Fidelity National
Information Services, Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
36