e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
June 30,
2010
|
Or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number:
001-31719
Molina Healthcare, Inc.
(Exact name of
registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
13-4204626
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
200 Oceangate, Suite 100
Long Beach, California
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
90802
(Zip
Code)
|
(562) 435-3666
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if
any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and
posted pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer o
|
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares of the issuers Common Stock, par
value $0.001 per share, outstanding as of July 30, 2010,
was approximately 25,836,000.
MOLINA
HEALTHCARE, INC.
Index
2
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1:
|
Financial
Statements.
|
MOLINA
HEALTHCARE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per-share data)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
460,985
|
|
|
$
|
469,501
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
175,212
|
|
|
|
174,844
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
155,380
|
|
|
|
136,654
|
|
Income and related taxes refundable
|
|
|
1,157
|
|
|
|
6,067
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
4,726
|
|
|
|
8,757
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
23,843
|
|
|
|
15,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
821,303
|
|
|
|
811,406
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
83,562
|
|
|
|
78,171
|
|
Deferred contract costs
|
|
|
8,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
120,480
|
|
|
|
80,846
|
|
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets
|
|
|
205,749
|
|
|
|
133,408
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
36,745
|
|
|
|
59,687
|
|
Restricted investments
|
|
|
41,028
|
|
|
|
36,274
|
|
Receivable for ceded life and annuity contracts
|
|
|
25,277
|
|
|
|
25,455
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
19,242
|
|
|
|
19,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,361,404
|
|
|
$
|
1,245,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical claims and benefits payable
|
|
$
|
345,600
|
|
|
$
|
316,516
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
111,022
|
|
|
|
71,732
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
19,305
|
|
|
|
101,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
475,927
|
|
|
|
490,233
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
266,409
|
|
|
|
158,900
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
9,075
|
|
|
|
12,506
|
|
Liability for ceded life and annuity contracts
|
|
|
25,277
|
|
|
|
25,455
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
16,862
|
|
|
|
15,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
793,550
|
|
|
|
702,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 80,000 shares
authorized; outstanding: 25,811 shares at June 30,
2010 and 25,607 shares at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 20,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
134,076
|
|
|
|
129,902
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(2,039
|
)
|
|
|
(1,812
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
435,791
|
|
|
|
414,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
567,854
|
|
|
|
542,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,361,404
|
|
|
$
|
1,245,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
MOLINA
HEALTHCARE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except
|
|
|
|
net income per share)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium revenue
|
|
$
|
976,685
|
|
|
$
|
925,507
|
|
|
$
|
1,941,905
|
|
|
$
|
1,782,991
|
|
Service revenue
|
|
|
21,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
1,599
|
|
|
|
2,082
|
|
|
|
3,120
|
|
|
|
5,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
999,338
|
|
|
|
927,589
|
|
|
|
1,966,079
|
|
|
|
1,788,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical care costs
|
|
|
839,613
|
|
|
|
803,206
|
|
|
|
1,662,429
|
|
|
|
1,541,094
|
|
Cost of service revenue
|
|
|
14,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
78,079
|
|
|
|
65,011
|
|
|
|
156,959
|
|
|
|
130,418
|
|
Premium tax expenses
|
|
|
34,995
|
|
|
|
30,300
|
|
|
|
69,541
|
|
|
|
57,355
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
11,219
|
|
|
|
9,584
|
|
|
|
21,280
|
|
|
|
18,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
978,160
|
|
|
|
908,101
|
|
|
|
1,924,463
|
|
|
|
1,747,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on retirement of convertible senior notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
21,178
|
|
|
|
19,488
|
|
|
|
41,616
|
|
|
|
42,649
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(4,099
|
)
|
|
|
(3,223
|
)
|
|
|
(7,456
|
)
|
|
|
(6,638
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
17,079
|
|
|
|
16,265
|
|
|
|
34,160
|
|
|
|
36,011
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
6,500
|
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
|
|
12,991
|
|
|
|
9,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
10,579
|
|
|
$
|
14,565
|
|
|
$
|
21,169
|
|
|
$
|
26,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
$
|
1.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
$
|
1.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
25,741
|
|
|
|
25,788
|
|
|
|
25,694
|
|
|
|
26,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
25,951
|
|
|
|
25,870
|
|
|
|
25,952
|
|
|
|
26,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
MOLINA
HEALTHCARE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
10,579
|
|
|
$
|
14,565
|
|
|
$
|
21,169
|
|
|
$
|
26,776
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on investments
|
|
|
(355
|
)
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
|
(355
|
)
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
10,224
|
|
|
$
|
15,205
|
|
|
$
|
20,942
|
|
|
$
|
27,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
MOLINA
HEALTHCARE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
21,169
|
|
|
$
|
26,776
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
23,912
|
|
|
|
18,636
|
|
Unrealized gain on trading securities
|
|
|
(2,860
|
)
|
|
|
(3,610
|
)
|
Loss on rights agreement
|
|
|
2,611
|
|
|
|
3,296
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
3,245
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
4,508
|
|
|
|
3,458
|
|
Non-cash interest on convertible senior notes
|
|
|
2,509
|
|
|
|
2,366
|
|
Gain on repurchase and retirement of convertible senior notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,532
|
)
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
|
696
|
|
Tax deficiency from employee stock compensation recorded as
additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
(383
|
)
|
|
|
(547
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
(1,598
|
)
|
|
|
(22,878
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(5,148
|
)
|
|
|
732
|
|
Medical claims and benefits payable
|
|
|
29,084
|
|
|
|
16,265
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
27,958
|
|
|
|
(15,726
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(82,680
|
)
|
|
|
54,638
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
4,910
|
|
|
|
9,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
25,303
|
|
|
|
94,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of equipment
|
|
|
(17,523
|
)
|
|
|
(19,924
|
)
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
(91,768
|
)
|
|
|
(72,182
|
)
|
Sales and maturities of investments
|
|
|
116,836
|
|
|
|
82,292
|
|
Cash paid in business purchase transactions
|
|
|
(134,400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in deferred contract costs
|
|
|
(8,018
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in restricted investments
|
|
|
(4,754
|
)
|
|
|
(6,534
|
)
|
Increase in other assets
|
|
|
(332
|
)
|
|
|
(2,761
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
1,089
|
|
|
|
(8,772
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(138,870
|
)
|
|
|
(27,881
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under credit facility
|
|
|
105,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock purchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,712
|
)
|
Purchase of convertible senior notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,653
|
)
|
Payment of credit facility fees
|
|
|
(1,671
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from employee stock plans
|
|
|
1,543
|
|
|
|
1,081
|
|
Excess tax benefits from employee stock compensation
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
105,051
|
|
|
|
(36,284
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(8,516
|
)
|
|
|
30,675
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
469,501
|
|
|
|
387,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
460,985
|
|
|
$
|
417,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
6,604
|
|
|
$
|
7,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
6,222
|
|
|
$
|
3,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
MOLINA
HEALTHCARE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on investments
|
|
$
|
(366
|
)
|
|
$
|
876
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized (loss) gain on investments
|
|
$
|
(227
|
)
|
|
$
|
608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued purchases of equipment
|
|
$
|
562
|
|
|
$
|
394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement of common stock used for stock-based compensation
|
|
$
|
1,673
|
|
|
$
|
775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Details of business purchase transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets acquired
|
|
$
|
(143,082
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,326
|
)
|
Fair value of liabilities assumed
|
|
|
11,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
Release of deposit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
Increase in payable to seller
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash paid in business purchase transactions
|
|
$
|
(131,250
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business purchase transactions adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets acquired
|
|
$
|
(901
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Decrease in payable to seller
|
|
|
(2,249
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash paid in business purchase transactions adjustments
|
|
$
|
(3,150
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
MOLINA
HEALTHCARE, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
June 30, 2010
Organization
and Operations
Molina Healthcare, Inc. is a multi-state managed care
organization that arranges for the delivery of health care
services to persons eligible for Medicaid, Medicare, and other
government-sponsored health care programs for low-income
families and individuals. We conduct our business primarily
through licensed health plans in the states of California,
Florida, Michigan, Missouri, New Mexico, Ohio, Texas, Utah, and
Washington. The health plans are locally operated by our
respective wholly owned subsidiaries in those states, each of
which is licensed as a health maintenance organization, or HMO.
Effective January 1, 2010, we terminated operations at our
small Medicare health plan in Nevada.
On May 1, 2010, we acquired a health information management
business which now operates under the name, Molina Medicaid
SolutionsSM.
Molina Medicaid Solutions provides design, development,
implementation, and business process outsourcing solutions to
state governments for their Medicaid Management Information
Systems, or MMIS. MMIS is a core tool used to support the
administration of state Medicaid and other health care
entitlement programs. Molina Medicaid Solutions currently holds
MMIS contracts with the states of Idaho, Louisiana, Maine, New
Jersey, and West Virginia, as well as a contract to provide drug
rebate administration services for the Florida Medicaid program.
See Note 3, Business Purchase Transactions, for
more information relating to this acquisition.
Consolidation
and Interim Financial Information
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Molina Healthcare, Inc. and all majority owned subsidiaries. In
the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary
for a fair presentation of the results as of the date and for
the interim periods presented have been included. Except as
described below, such adjustments consist of normal recurring
adjustments. All significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The
consolidated results of operations for the current interim
period are not necessarily indicative of the results for the
entire year ending December 31, 2010. Financial information
related to subsidiaries acquired during any year is included
only for the period subsequent to their acquisition.
The unaudited consolidated interim financial statements have
been prepared under the assumption that users of the interim
financial data have either read or have access to our audited
consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009. Accordingly, certain disclosures that
would substantially duplicate the disclosures contained in the
December 31, 2009 audited consolidated financial statements
have been omitted. These unaudited consolidated interim
financial statements should be read in conjunction with our
December 31, 2009 audited financial statements.
Reclassifications
Effective January 1, 2010, we have recorded the Michigan
modified gross receipts tax as a premium tax and not as an
income tax. For the three month and six month periods ended
June 30, 2009, amounts for premium tax expense and income
tax expense have been reclassified to conform to this
presentation. See Note 2, Significant Accounting
Policies.
In prior periods, general and administrative expenses have
included premium tax expenses. Beginning with the three month
and six month periods ended June 30, 2010, we have reported
premium tax expenses on a separate line in the accompanying
consolidated statements of income. Prior periods have been
reclassified to conform to this presentation.
8
|
|
2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies
|
Molina
Medicaid Solutions Segment Revenue Recognition and Deferred
Contract Costs
As a result of our recent acquisition of Molina Medicaid
Solutions, a portion of our revenues is derived from service
arrangements. This segment provides technology solutions to
state Medicaid programs that include system development, system
integration, and technology outsourcing services. In addition,
this segment offers business process outsourcing to state
Medicaid agencies that handle key administrative functions such
as claims processing, provider enrollment, pharmacy drug rebate
services, recipient eligibility management, and
pre-authorization services. The following is an update of our
accounting policy, as included in our December 31, 2009
audited financial statements, which specifically addresses
revenue recognition for service arrangements.
Under certain of the contracts we acquired, the development of
the MMIS solution has already been completed. Under these
contracts, we provide business process outsourcing and
technology outsourcing services, and recognize outsourcing
services revenue on a straight-line basis over the remaining
term of the contract.
For fixed-price contracts where the system design and
development phase were in process as of the acquisition date, we
apply contract accounting because we will deliver significantly
modified and customized MMIS software to the customer under the
terms of the contract. Additionally, these contracts contain
multiple deliverables; once the system design and development
phase is complete, we provide technology outsourcing services
and business process outsourcing. We do not have vendor specific
objective evidence of the fair value of the technology
outsourcing and business process outsourcing components of the
contracts because we do not have enough history of offering
these services on a stand-alone basis. As such we account for
these fixed-price service contracts as a single element.
Therefore, in general, we recognize contract revenues as a
single element ratably over the performance period, or contract
term, of the outsourcing services because these are the last
elements to be delivered under the contract. Such contract terms
typically range from five to 10 years. In those service
arrangements where final acceptance of a system or solution by
the customer is required, contract revenues and costs are
deferred until all acceptance criteria have been met.
Performance will often extend over long periods, and our right
to receive future payment depends on our future performance in
accordance with the agreement. Revenues earned in excess of
related billings are accrued, whereas billings in excess of
revenues earned are deferred until the related services are
provided.
Deferred contract costs include direct and incremental costs
such as direct labor, hardware and software. We also defer and
subsequently amortize certain transition costs related to
activities that transition the contract from the design,
development, and implementation phase to the operational, or
business process outsourcing phase. Deferred contract costs,
including transition costs, are amortized on a straight-line
basis over the remaining original contract term, consistent with
the revenue recognition period.
The recoverability of deferred contract costs associated with a
particular contract is analyzed on a periodic basis using the
undiscounted estimated cash flows of the whole contract over its
remaining contract term. If such undiscounted cash flows are
insufficient to recover the long-lived assets and deferred
contract costs, the deferred contract costs are written down by
the amount of the cash flow deficiency. If a cash flow
deficiency remains after reducing the balance of the deferred
contract costs to zero, any remaining long-lived assets are
evaluated for impairment. Any such impairment recognized would
equal the amount by which the carrying value of the long-lived
assets exceeds the fair value of those assets. Indirect costs
associated with MMIS service contracts are generally expensed as
incurred.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at historical cost.
Replacements and major improvements are capitalized, and repairs
and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. Furniture
and equipment are generally depreciated using the straight-line
method over estimated useful lives ranging from three to seven
years. Software developed for internal use is capitalized.
Software is generally amortized over its estimated useful life
of three years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the
term of the lease, or over their useful lives from five to
10 years, whichever is shorter. Buildings are depreciated
over their estimated useful lives of 31.5 years.
9
As discussed in Molina Medicaid Solutions Segment Revenue
Recognition and Deferred Contract Costs above, the costs
associated with certain equipment and software, which may be
ultimately sold to our clients under fixed-price contracts, are
capitalized and recorded as deferred contract costs. Such costs
will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the performance
period, consistent with the revenue recognition period.
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the
fair value of net assets acquired. Identifiable intangible
assets (consisting principally of purchased contract rights and
provider contracts) are generally amortized on a straight-line
basis over the expected period to be benefited (between one and
15 years).
Goodwill and indefinite-lived assets are not amortized, but are
subject to impairment tests on an annual basis or, more
frequently, if indicators of impairment exist. We used a
discounted cash flow methodology to assess the fair values of
our reporting units. If the carrying values of our reporting
units exceed the fair values, we perform a hypothetical purchase
price allocation. Impairment is measured by comparing the
goodwill derived from the hypothetical purchase price allocation
to the carrying value of the goodwill and indefinite-lived asset
balance.
Identifiable intangible assets associated with Molina Medicaid
Solutions are classified as either contract backlog or customer
relationships.
The contract backlog intangible asset is comprised of all
contractual cash flows anticipated to be received during the
remaining contracted period for each specific contract. The
contract backlog intangible has been developed on a
contract-by-contract
basis. The amortization of that portion of the contract backlog
intangible associated with contracts for which revenue
recognition has not yet commenced is deferred until revenue
recognition has begun. As each acquired contract constitutes a
single revenue element contract, amortization of the contract
backlog intangible is recorded to contra-service revenue so that
amortization is matched to any revenues associated with contract
performance that occurred prior to the acquisition date.
Amortization of the contract backlog intangible asset is
recorded on a straight line basis for each specific contract
over a period of one to six years.
The customer relationship intangible asset is comprised of all
contractual cash flows that are anticipated to be received
during the option periods of each specific contract as well as
anticipated renewals of those contracts. Amortization of the
customer relationship intangible is recorded to amortization
expense on a straight-line basis for each specific contract over
a period of four to eight years.
The determination of the value of identifiable intangible assets
requires us to make estimates and assumptions about estimated
asset lives, future business trends, and growth. In addition to
annual impairment testing, we continually evaluate whether
events and circumstances have occurred that indicate the balance
of identifiable intangible assets may not be recoverable. In
evaluating impairment, we compare the estimated fair value of
the intangible asset to its underlying book value. Such
evaluation is significantly impacted by estimates and
assumptions of future revenues, costs and expenses, and other
factors. If an event occurs that would cause us to revise our
estimates and assumptions used in analyzing the value of our
identifiable intangible assets, such revision could result in a
non-cash impairment charge that could have a material impact on
our financial results.
Depreciation
and Amortization
Beginning in the second quarter of 2010, the amortization of a
portion of the purchased intangibles associated with the
acquisition of Molina Medicaid Solutions is recorded as
contra-service revenue, rather than as part of depreciation and
amortization expense, to match revenues associated with contract
performance that occurred prior to the acquisition date.
Additionally, most of the depreciation expense associated with
Molina Medicaid Solutions is
10
recorded as cost of service revenue. The following table
presents all depreciation and amortization expense recorded in
our consolidated financial statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
11,219
|
|
|
$
|
9,584
|
|
|
$
|
21,280
|
|
|
$
|
18,636
|
|
Amortization expense recorded as contra-service revenue
|
|
|
1,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense recorded as cost of service revenue
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization reported in our consolidated
statements of cash flows
|
|
$
|
13,851
|
|
|
$
|
9,584
|
|
|
$
|
23,912
|
|
|
$
|
18,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
Taxes
The provision for income taxes is determined using an estimated
annual effective tax rate, which is generally greater than the
U.S. federal statutory rate primarily because of state
taxes. The effective tax rate may be subject to fluctuations
during the year as new information is obtained. Such information
may affect the assumptions used to estimate the annual effective
tax rate, including factors such as the mix of pretax earnings
in the various tax jurisdictions in which we operate, valuation
allowances against deferred tax assets, the recognition or
derecognition of tax benefits related to uncertain tax
positions, and changes in or the interpretation of tax laws in
jurisdictions where we conduct business. We recognize deferred
tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences between the
financial reporting basis and the tax basis of our assets and
liabilities, along with net operating loss and tax credit
carryovers.
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was
$11.0 million and $4.1 million at June, 2010, and
December 31, 2009, respectively. Approximately
$8.4 million of the unrecognized tax benefits recorded at
June 30, 2010, relates to a tax position claimed on a state
refund claim that will not result in a cash payment for income
taxes if our claim is denied. The total amount of unrecognized
tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax
rate was $7.9 million and $3.4 million as of
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. We
expect that during the next 12 months it is reasonably
possible that unrecognized tax benefit liabilities will decrease
by approximately $0.4 million due to the expiration of
statute of limitations.
Our continuing practice is to recognize interest
and/or
penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax
expense. Our accrual for the payment of interest relating to
unrecognized tax benefits was $88,000 and $75,000 as of
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Effective January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2009,
income tax expense included both the Michigan business income
tax, or BIT, and Michigan modified gross receipts tax, or MGRT.
Effective January 1, 2010, we have recorded the MGRT as a
premium tax and not as an income tax. We will continue to record
the BIT as an income tax. The MGRT amounted to $3.1 million
and $2.2 million for the six months ended June 30,
2010, and 2009, respectively.
Generally, the MGRT is a 0.976% tax (statutory rate of 0.8% plus
21.99% surtax) on modified gross receipts, which for most
taxpayers is defined as receipts less purchases from other
firms. Managed care organizations, however, are not currently
allowed to deduct payments to providers in determining modified
gross receipts. As a result, the MGRT is 0.976% of our Michigan
plans receipts and does not vary with levels of pretax
income or margins. We believe that presentation of the MGRT as a
premium tax produces financial statements that are more useful
to the reader.
11
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
Revenue Recognition. In late 2009, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued the
following new accounting guidance which is first applicable for
our January 1, 2011 reporting:
|
|
|
|
|
ASU
No. 2009-14,
Software (ASC Topic 985) Certain Revenue
Arrangements That Include Software Elements, a consensus of
the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force. This guidance modifies the
scope of ASC Subtopic
985-605
Software-Revenue Recognition to exclude from its
requirements (a) non-software components of tangible
products and (b) software components of tangible products
that are sold, licensed or leased with tangible products when
the software components and non-software components of the
tangible product function together to deliver the tangible
products essential functionality. We do not expect the
update to impact our consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
|
|
|
|
ASU
No. 2009-13,
Revenue Recognition (ASC Topic 605)
Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, a consensus of
the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force. This guidance modifies
previous requirements by allowing the use of the best
estimate of selling price in the absence of
vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) or
verifiable objective evidence (VOE) (now referred to
as TPE or third-party evidence) for determining the
selling price of a deliverable. A vendor is now required to use
its best estimate of the selling price when more objective
evidence of the selling price cannot be determined. In addition,
the residual method of allocating arrangement consideration is
no longer permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of
this update to our consolidated financial position, results of
operations and cash flows.
|
Fair Value Measurements. In January 2010, the
FASB issued guidance which expanded the required disclosures
about fair value measurements. In particular, this guidance
requires (a) separate disclosure of the amounts of
significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and
Level 2 fair value measurements along with the reasons for
such transfers, (b) information about purchases, sales,
issuances and settlements to be presented separately in the
reconciliation for Level 3 fair value measurements,
(c) fair value measurement disclosures for each class of
assets and liabilities and (d) disclosures about the
valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for
both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements for fair
value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or
Level 3. Effective for interim and annual reporting
beginning after December 15, 2009, with one new disclosure
effective after December 15, 2010, we adopted this guidance
in full during the interim period ended March 31, 2010. The
adoption of this guidance did not impact our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
|
|
3.
|
Business
Purchase Transactions
|
Molina
Medicaid Solutions
On May 1, 2010, we acquired a health information management
business that was previously an operating unit of Unisys
Corporation. This business now operates under the name Molina
Medicaid
SolutionsSM,
or Molina Medicaid Solutions. Molina Medicaid Solutions provides
design, development, implementation, and business process
outsourcing solutions to state governments for their Medicaid
Management Information Systems (MMIS). MMIS is a core tool used
to support the administration of state Medicaid and other health
care entitlement programs. Molina Medicaid Solutions currently
holds MMIS contracts with the states of Idaho, Louisiana, Maine,
New Jersey, and West Virginia, as well as a contract to provide
drug rebate administration services for the Florida Medicaid
program. As a result of this acquisition, we are diversifying
our core health plan business, and we believe that the use of a
common claims processing platform across our health plans and
our new MMIS business will enable us to achieve synergies in the
operations of both.
We paid $131.3 million to acquire Molina Medicaid
Solutions; the purchase price is subject to working capital
adjustments. The acquisition was funded with available cash of
$26 million and $105 million drawn under our credit
facility. In connection with the closing, both the fourth
amendment and the fifth amendment to our credit facility became
effective (see Note 11, Long-Term Debt).
Recording of assets acquired and liabilities
assumed: The transaction has been accounted for
using the acquisition method of accounting which requires, among
other things, that most assets acquired and liabilities assumed
be recognized at their fair values as of the acquisition date.
Accounts receivable are based on gross
12
contractual amounts receivable, substantially all of which we
expect to collect because the creditors are state governments.
The following table summarizes the provisional acquisition-date
fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
17,128
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
4,129
|
|
Equipment and other long-term assets
|
|
|
1,003
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
49,460
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
71,362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,082
|
|
Less: liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
11,346
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
115
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
131,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The recorded amounts for assets and liabilities are provisional
and subject to change. We will finalize the amounts recognized
as we obtain the information necessary to complete the analyses,
but by no later than December 31, 2010. Among the items
that may change are amounts for intangibles and deferred taxes
pending finalization of valuation efforts and the purchase
price consideration subject to working capital adjustments.
A single estimate of fair value results from a complex series of
judgments about future events and uncertainties and relies
heavily on estimates and assumptions. Results that differ from
the estimates and judgments used to determine the estimated fair
value assigned to each class of assets acquired and liabilities
assumed, as well as asset lives, can materially impact our
results of operations.
Accounts receivable: Accounts receivable are
stated at fair value, based on the gross contractual amounts
receivable. We expect to collect substantially all of the
accounts receivable because the creditors are state governments.
Identifiable intangible assets: The following
table is a summary of the fair value estimates of the
identifiable intangible assets and their weighted-average useful
lives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
21,820
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
Contract backlog
|
|
|
27,640
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
49,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill: Goodwill in the amount of
$71.4 million was recognized for this acquisition, of which
approximately $70.9 million is expected to be deductible
for tax purposes. The total goodwill amount was calculated as
the excess of the consideration transferred over the net assets
recognized and represents the future economic benefits
13
arising from other assets acquired that could not be
individually identified and separately recognized. The goodwill
recorded as part of the acquisition of Molina Medicaid Solutions
includes:
|
|
|
|
|
Expected synergies and other benefits that we believe will
result from combining the operations of Medicaid Solutions with
the operations of Molina;
|
|
|
|
Any intangible assets that do not qualify for separate
recognition such as the assembled workforce; and
|
|
|
|
The value of the going-concern element of Molina Medicaid
Solutions existing businesses (the higher rate of return
on the assembled collection of net assets versus acquiring all
of the net assets separately).
|
Accounts payable and accrued
liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued
liabilities include $1.5 million payable to the seller of
Molina Medicaid Solutions, which represents additional
consideration for the acquisition based on a working capital
adjustment provided in the purchase agreement. The working
capital adjustment provides that the net working capital, or
current assets minus current liabilities, on Molina Medicaid
Solutions opening balance sheet equals $10 million.
To the extent the final net working capital conveyed by the
seller exceeds $10 million, the amount is payable back to
the seller; conversely, to the extent that net working capital
conveyed by the seller is less than $10 million, the
shortage is a receivable from the seller. Thus, the
$1.5 million amount described above represents the amount
payable to the seller for net working capital in excess of
$10 million on the opening balance sheet. This amount may
change based on final negotiations with the seller.
Pro-forma impact of the acquisition: The
unaudited pro-forma results presented below include the effects
of the acquisition as if it had been consummated as of
January 1, 2010 and 2009. The pro-forma results include the
amortization associated with an estimate for the acquired
intangible assets and interest expense associated with debt used
to fund the acquisition. To better reflect the combined
operating results, material non-recurring charges directly
attributable to the transaction have been excluded. In addition,
the pro-forma results do not include any anticipated synergies
or other expected benefits of the acquisition. Accordingly, the
unaudited pro forma financial information below is not
necessarily indicative of either future results of operations or
results that might have been achieved had the acquisition been
consummated as of January 1, 2010 or January 1, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
1,009,500
|
|
|
$
|
953,016
|
|
|
$
|
2,005,814
|
|
|
$
|
1,839,224
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
11,725
|
|
|
$
|
14,536
|
|
|
$
|
25,011
|
|
|
$
|
26,308
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
0.96
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
Our reportable segments are consistent with how we manage the
business and view the markets we serve. In the second quarter of
2010, we added a segment to our internal financial reporting
structure as a result of the acquisition of Molina Medicaid
Solutions described in Note 3, Business Purchase
Transactions.
We will now report our financial performance based on the
following two reportable segments Health Plans and
Molina Medicaid Solutions. The Health Plans segment represents
our former single-segment health plan operations. The Molina
Medicaid Solutions segment represents the operations of our new
MMIS solutions business.
We rely on an internal management reporting process that
provides segment information to the operating income level for
purposes of making financial decisions and allocating resources.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those
described in Note 2, Significant Accounting
Policies. The cost of services shared between the Health
Plans and Molina Medicaid Solutions segments is charged to the
Health Plans segment.
14
Operating segment revenues and profitability for the three
months and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Molina
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicaid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Plans
|
|
|
Solutions
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium revenue
|
|
$
|
976,685
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
976,685
|
|
Service revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,054
|
|
|
|
21,054
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
1,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
978,284
|
|
|
$
|
21,054
|
|
|
$
|
999,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
16,173
|
|
|
$
|
5,005
|
|
|
$
|
21,178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium revenue
|
|
$
|
1,941,905
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,941,905
|
|
Service revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,054
|
|
|
|
21,054
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
3,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
1,945,025
|
|
|
$
|
21,054
|
|
|
$
|
1,966,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
36,611
|
|
|
$
|
5,005
|
|
|
$
|
41,616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium revenue
|
|
$
|
925,507
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
925,507
|
|
Service revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
2,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
927,589
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
927,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
19,488
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium revenue
|
|
$
|
1,782,991
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,782,991
|
|
Service revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
5,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
1,788,620
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,788,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
42,649
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
42,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation
to Income before Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Segment operating income
|
|
$
|
21,178
|
|
|
$
|
19,488
|
|
|
$
|
41,616
|
|
|
$
|
42,649
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(4,099
|
)
|
|
|
(3,223
|
)
|
|
|
(7,456
|
)
|
|
|
(6,638
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
$
|
17,079
|
|
|
$
|
16,265
|
|
|
$
|
34,160
|
|
|
$
|
36,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Segment
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Molina
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicaid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Plans
|
|
|
Solutions
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
1,198,812
|
|
|
$
|
162,592
|
|
|
$
|
1,361,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
1,044,938
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,044,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The denominators for the computation of basic and diluted
earnings per share were calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Shares outstanding at the beginning of the period
|
|
|
25,728
|
|
|
|
25,991
|
|
|
|
25,607
|
|
|
|
26,725
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares repurchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(618
|
)
|
Weighted-average number of shares issued
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic earnings per share
|
|
|
25,741
|
|
|
|
25,788
|
|
|
|
25,694
|
|
|
|
26,157
|
|
Dilutive effect of employee stock options and stock grants(1)
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per share(2)
|
|
|
25,951
|
|
|
|
25,870
|
|
|
|
25,952
|
|
|
|
26,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Options to purchase common shares are included in the
calculation of diluted earnings per share when their exercise
prices are below the average fair value of the common shares for
each of the periods presented. For the three months ended
June 30, 2010, and 2009, there were approximately 483,000
and 623,000 antidilutive weighted options, respectively. For the
six months ended June 30, 2010, and 2009, there were
approximately 497,000 and 625,000 antidilutive weighted options,
respectively. Restricted shares are included in the calculation
of diluted earnings per share when their grant date fair values
are below the average fair value of the common shares for each
of the periods presented. For the three months ended
June 30, 2010, and 2009, there were approximately 1,000,
and 292,000 antidilutive weighted restricted shares,
respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, and
2009, there were approximately 9,000, and 34,000 antidilutive
weighted restricted shares, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Potentially dilutive shares issuable pursuant to our convertible
senior notes were not included in the computation of diluted
earnings per share because to do so would have been
anti-dilutive for the three month and six month periods ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009. |
|
|
6.
|
Share-Based
Compensation
|
At June 30, 2010, we had employee equity incentives
outstanding under two plans: (1) the 2002 Equity Incentive
Plan; and (2) the 2000 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan
(from which equity incentives are no longer awarded). Charged to
general and administrative expenses, total stock-based
compensation expense was as follows for the three month and six
month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Restricted stock awards
|
|
$
|
2,106
|
|
|
$
|
1,822
|
|
|
$
|
3,745
|
|
|
$
|
2,874
|
|
Stock options (including shares issued under our employee stock
purchase plan)
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
763
|
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
2,371
|
|
|
$
|
2,024
|
|
|
$
|
4,508
|
|
|
$
|
3,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
As of June 30, 2010, there was $17.3 million of total
unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested restricted
stock awards, which we expect to be recognized over a remaining
weighted-average period of 2.9 years. Also as of
June 30, 2010, there was $565,000 of unrecognized
compensation expense related to unvested stock options, which we
expect to recognize over a remaining weighted-average period of
0.8 years.
Unvested restricted stock and restricted stock activity for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Unvested balance as of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
687,630
|
|
|
$
|
24.64
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
498,125
|
|
|
|
22.51
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(205,313
|
)
|
|
|
25.38
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(44,725
|
)
|
|
|
23.61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested balance as of June 30, 2010
|
|
|
935,717
|
|
|
|
23.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total fair value of restricted shares granted during the six
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $11.2 million
and $7.6 million, respectively. The total fair value of
restricted shares vested during the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $4.6 million and
$2.4 million, respectively. Stock option activity during
the six months ended June 30, 2010 is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
Stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
650,739
|
|
|
$
|
30.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(19,460
|
)
|
|
|
23.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(4,513
|
)
|
|
|
32.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options outstanding as of June 30, 2010
|
|
|
626,766
|
|
|
$
|
30.43
|
|
|
$
|
863
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options exercisable and expected to vest as of
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
622,510
|
|
|
$
|
30.42
|
|
|
$
|
863
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable as of June 30, 2010
|
|
|
570,099
|
|
|
$
|
30.26
|
|
|
$
|
860
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
Our consolidated balance sheets include the following financial
instruments: cash and cash equivalents, investments,
receivables, trade accounts payable, medical claims and benefits
payable, long-term debt and other liabilities. We consider the
carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, receivables,
other current assets and current liabilities to approximate
their fair value because of the relatively short period of time
between the origination of these instruments and their expected
realization or payment. For a comprehensive discussion of fair
value measurements with regard to our current and non-current
investments, see below.
Based on quoted market prices, the fair value of our convertible
senior notes issued in October 2007 was $175.1 million at
June 30, 2010, and $160.8 million at December 31,
2009. The carrying amount of the convertible senior notes was
$161.4 million at June 30, 2010, and
$158.9 million at December 31, 2009.
To prioritize the inputs we use in measuring fair value, we
apply a three-tier fair value hierarchy. These tiers include:
Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices
in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than
quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or
indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable
inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore
requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.
17
As of June 30, 2010, we held certain assets that are
required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
These included investments as follows:
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Classification
|
|
Description
|
|
Current assets:
Investments (see Note 8)
|
|
Investment grade debt securities; designated as
available-for-sale; reported at fair value based on market
prices that are readily available (Level 1).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets:
Investments (see Note 8)
|
|
Auction rate securities; designated as available-for-sale;
reported at fair value based on discounted cash flow analysis or
other type of valuation model (Level 3).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction rate securities; designated as trading; reported at fair
value based on discounted cash flow analysis or other type of
valuation model (Level 3).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
Other assets include auction rate securities rights (the
Rights); reported at fair value based on discounted
cash flow analysis or other type of valuation model (Level 3).
|
As of June 30, 2010, $42.2 million par value (fair
value of $36.7 million) of our investments consisted of
auction rate securities, all of which were collateralized by
student loan portfolios guaranteed by the U.S. government.
We continued to earn interest on substantially all of these
auction rate securities as of June 30, 2010. Due to events
in the credit markets, the auction rate securities held by us
experienced failed auctions beginning in the first quarter of
2008. As such, quoted prices in active markets were not readily
available during the majority of 2008, all of 2009, and
continued to be unavailable as of June 30, 2010. To
estimate the fair value of these securities, we used pricing
models that included factors such as the collateral underlying
the securities, the creditworthiness of the counterparty, the
timing of expected future cash flows, and the expectation of the
next time the security would have a successful auction. The
estimated values of these securities were also compared, when
possible, to valuation data with respect to similar securities
held by other parties. We concluded that these estimates, given
the lack of market available pricing, provided a reasonable
basis for determining fair value of the auction rate securities
as of June 30, 2010.
As of June 30, 2010, we held $15.9 million par value
(fair value of $14.6 million) auction rate securities
(designated as trading securities) with a certain investment
securities firm. In the fourth quarter of 2008, we entered into
a rights agreement with this firm that (1) allows us to
exercise rights (the Rights) to sell the eligible
auction rate securities at par value to this firm between
June 30, 2010 and July 2, 2012, and (2) gives the
investment securities firm the right to purchase the auction
rate securities from us any time after the agreement date as
long as we receive the par value. On June 30, 2010, we
began to exercise these Rights. The balance of the eligible
auction rate securities, totaling $15.9 million as of
June 30, 2010, was sold at par value on July 1, 2010
(see Note 14, Subsequent Events).
We have accounted for the Rights as a freestanding financial
instrument and have elected to record the value of the Rights
under the fair value option. We recorded pretax losses on the
Rights, attributable to the decline in the fair value of the
Rights, totaling $2.6 million, and $3.3 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2010, and 2009, respectively.
To determine the fair value estimate of the Rights, we used a
discounted cash-flow model based on the expectation that the
auction rate securities will be put back to the investment
securities firm at par on June 30, 2010, as permitted by
the rights agreement. As of June 30, 2010, the recorded
value of the Rights, totaling $1.3 million, equals the
cumulative unrealized losses on the remaining auction rate
securities underlying the Rights.
For the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, we
recorded pretax gains of $2.9 million and
$3.6 million, respectively, on the auction rate securities
underlying the Rights.
As of June 30, 2010, the remainder of our auction rate
securities (designated as
available-for-sale
securities) amounted to $26.3 million par value (fair value
of $22.2 million). As a result of the decrease in fair
value of auction
18
rate securities designated as
available-for-sale,
we recorded pretax unrealized losses of $0.2 million to
accumulated other comprehensive loss for the six months ended
June 30, 2010. We have deemed these unrealized losses to be
temporary and attribute the decline in value to liquidity
issues, as a result of the failed auction market, rather than to
credit issues. Any future fluctuation in fair value related to
these instruments that we deem to be temporary, including any
recoveries of previous write-downs, would be recorded to
accumulated other comprehensive loss. If we determine that any
future valuation adjustment was
other-than-temporary,
we would record a charge to earnings as appropriate.
Our assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at
June 30, 2010, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
$
|
175,212
|
|
|
$
|
175,212
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Auction rate securities
(available-for-sale)
|
|
|
22,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,156
|
|
Auction rate securities (trading)
|
|
|
14,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,589
|
|
Auction rate securities rights
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
|
$
|
213,267
|
|
|
$
|
175,212
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
38,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents a roll-forward of the balance of
our assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using
significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
63,494
|
|
Total gains (unrealized):
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings
|
|
|
363
|
|
Included in other comprehensive income
|
|
|
(202
|
)
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(25,600
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
38,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of total losses for the period included in other
comprehensive loss attributable to the change in unrealized
losses relating to assets still held at June 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
(202
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables summarize our investments as of the dates
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprise securities
|
|
$
|
83,695
|
|
|
$
|
486
|
|
|
$
|
228
|
|
|
$
|
83,953
|
|
Municipal securities (including non-current auction rate
securities)
|
|
|
64,045
|
|
|
|
1,265
|
|
|
|
4,216
|
|
|
|
61,094
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
43,282
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
610
|
|
|
|
42,793
|
|
U.S. treasury notes
|
|
|
20,732
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
20,846
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
3,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
215,025
|
|
|
$
|
1,996
|
|
|
$
|
5,064
|
|
|
$
|
211,957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprise securities
|
|
$
|
89,451
|
|
|
$
|
504
|
|
|
$
|
281
|
|
|
$
|
89,674
|
|
Municipal securities (including non-current auction rate
securities)
|
|
|
82,009
|
|
|
|
3,120
|
|
|
|
4,154
|
|
|
|
80,975
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
32,543
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
32,564
|
|
U.S. treasury notes
|
|
|
28,052
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
28,060
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
3,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
235,313
|
|
|
$
|
3,922
|
|
|
$
|
4,704
|
|
|
$
|
234,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The contractual maturities of our investments as of
June 30, 2010 are summarized below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
88,660
|
|
|
$
|
88,305
|
|
Due one year through five years
|
|
|
86,232
|
|
|
|
86,378
|
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
1,430
|
|
|
|
1,411
|
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
38,703
|
|
|
|
35,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
215,025
|
|
|
$
|
211,957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized gains and gross realized losses from sales of
available-for-sale
securities are calculated under the specific identification
method and are included in investment income. Total proceeds
from sales of
available-for-sale
securities were $29.9 million and $46.5 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2010, and 2009,
respectively. Total proceeds from sales of
available-for-sale
securities were $65.9 million and $82.0 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2010, and 2009, respectively.
Net realized investment gains for the three months ended
June 30, 2010, and 2009 were $43,000 and $36,000
respectively. Net realized investment gains for the six months
ended June 30, 2010, and 2009 were $57,000 and $195,000
respectively.
We monitor our investments for
other-than-temporary
impairment. For investments other than our municipal securities,
we have determined that unrealized gains and losses at
June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, are temporary in
nature, because the change in market value for these securities
has resulted from fluctuating interest rates, rather than a
deterioration of the credit worthiness of the issuers. So long
as we hold these securities to maturity, we are unlikely to
experience gains or losses. In the event that we dispose of
these securities before maturity, we expect that realized gains
or losses, if any, will be immaterial.
Our investment in municipal securities consists primarily of
auction rate securities. As described in Note 7, Fair
Value Measurements, the unrealized losses on these
investments were caused primarily by the illiquidity in the
auction markets. Because the decline in market value is not due
to the credit quality of the issuers, and because we do not
intend to sell, nor is it more likely than not that we will be
required to sell, these investments before recovery of their
cost, we do not consider the auction rate securities that are
designated as
available-for-sale
to be
other-than-temporarily
impaired at June 30, 2010.
20
The following table segregates those
available-for-sale
investments that have been in a continuous loss position for
less than 12 months, and those that have been in a loss
position for 12 months or more as of June 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In a Continuous Loss
|
|
|
In a Continuous Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position
|
|
|
Position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Less than 12 Months
|
|
|
for 12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprise securities
|
|
$
|
6,008
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
8,468
|
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
|
$
|
14,476
|
|
|
$
|
228
|
|
Municipal securities
|
|
|
15,049
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
23,287
|
|
|
|
4,106
|
|
|
|
38,336
|
|
|
|
4,216
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
12,970
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
11,439
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
24,409
|
|
|
|
610
|
|
U.S. treasury notes
|
|
|
9,983
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,983
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
44,010
|
|
|
$
|
496
|
|
|
$
|
43,194
|
|
|
$
|
4,568
|
|
|
$
|
87,204
|
|
|
$
|
5,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table segregates those
available-for-sale
investments that have been in a continuous loss position for
less than 12 months, and those that have been in a loss
position for 12 months or more as of December 31,
2009. At December 31, 2009, we previously reported only
those
available-for-sale
investments in an unrealized loss position for at least two
consecutive months. To conform to the current year presentation,
we have included all
available-for-sale
investments in an unrealized loss position at December 31,
2009. This presentation change increased the total amount of
unrealized losses reported in the following table by $113,000 at
December 31, 2009. The accompanying increase to the
estimated fair value of the underlying investments amounted to
$42.9 million at December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In a Continuous Loss
|
|
|
In a Continuous Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position
|
|
|
Position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Less than 12 Months
|
|
|
for 12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprise securities
|
|
$
|
30,460
|
|
|
$
|
187
|
|
|
$
|
7,297
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
$
|
37,757
|
|
|
$
|
281
|
|
Municipal securities
|
|
|
12,460
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
24,031
|
|
|
|
3,902
|
|
|
|
36,491
|
|
|
|
3,980
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
13,513
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
1,203
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
14,716
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
U.S. treasury notes
|
|
|
21,824
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,824
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
78,257
|
|
|
$
|
498
|
|
|
$
|
32,531
|
|
|
$
|
4,032
|
|
|
$
|
110,788
|
|
|
$
|
4,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
Health Plans receivables consist primarily of amounts due from
the various states in which we operate. Such receivables are
subject to potential retroactive adjustment. Molina Medicaid
Solutions receivables consist primarily of MMIS
development milestone billings to states. Because all of our
receivable amounts are readily determinable and our creditors
are in almost all instances state governments, our allowance for
doubtful accounts is immaterial. Any amounts determined to be
uncollectible are charged to expense when such determination is
made. Accounts receivable were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Health Plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California
|
|
$
|
32,196
|
|
|
$
|
34,289
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
19,017
|
|
|
|
14,977
|
|
Missouri
|
|
|
19,756
|
|
|
|
19,670
|
|
New Mexico
|
|
|
7,012
|
|
|
|
11,919
|
|
Ohio
|
|
|
24,157
|
|
|
|
37,004
|
|
Utah
|
|
|
4,691
|
|
|
|
6,107
|
|
Washington
|
|
|
16,373
|
|
|
|
9,910
|
|
Others
|
|
|
4,240
|
|
|
|
2,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,442
|
|
|
|
136,654
|
|
Molina Medicaid Solutions
|
|
|
27,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total receivables
|
|
$
|
155,380
|
|
|
$
|
136,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Restricted
Investments
|
Pursuant to the regulations governing our Health Plan
subsidiaries, we maintain statutory deposits and deposits
required by state Medicaid authorities in certificates of
deposit and U.S. treasury securities. Additionally, we
maintain restricted investments as protection against the
insolvency of capitated providers. The following table presents
the balances of restricted investments by health plan, and by
our insurance company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
California
|
|
$
|
369
|
|
|
$
|
368
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
3,454
|
|
|
|
2,052
|
|
Insurance company
|
|
|
4,714
|
|
|
|
4,686
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Missouri
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
New Mexico
|
|
|
16,116
|
|
|
|
15,497
|
|
Ohio
|
|
|
9,053
|
|
|
|
9,036
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
3,501
|
|
|
|
1,515
|
|
Utah
|
|
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
578
|
|
Washington
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
Other
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
41,028
|
|
|
$
|
36,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
The contractual maturities of our
held-to-maturity
restricted investments as of June 30, 2010 are summarized
below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
31,209
|
|
|
$
|
31,212
|
|
Due one year through five years
|
|
|
9,677
|
|
|
|
9,709
|
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
41,028
|
|
|
$
|
41,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit
Facility
In 2005, we entered into an Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement, dated as of March 9, 2005, among Molina
Healthcare Inc., certain lenders, and Bank of America N.A., as
Administrative Agent (the Credit Facility).
Effective May 2008, we entered into a third amendment of the
Credit Facility that increased the size of the revolving line of
credit from $180.0 million to $200.0 million, maturing
in May 2012. The Credit Facility is intended to be used for
general corporate purposes. Borrowings under the Credit Facility
totaled $105.0 million at June 30, 2010.
Our obligations under the Credit Facility are secured by a lien
on substantially all of our assets and by a pledge of the
capital stock of our health plan subsidiaries (with the
exception of the California health plan). The Credit Facility
includes usual and customary covenants for credit facilities of
this type, including covenants limiting liens, mergers, asset
sales, other fundamental changes, debt, acquisitions, dividends
and other distributions, capital expenditures, investments, and
a fixed charge coverage ratio. The Credit Facility also requires
us to maintain a ratio of total consolidated debt to total
consolidated EBITDA of not more than 2.75 to 1.00 at any time.
At June 30, 2010, we were in compliance with all financial
covenants in the Credit Facility.
Subject to the closing of the Molina Medicaid Solutions
acquisition, in November 2009 we agreed to enter into a fourth
amendment to the Credit Facility. The fourth amendment became
effective upon the closing of the acquisition of Molina Medicaid
Solutions on May 1, 2010. The fourth amendment was required
because the $135 million purchase price for this
acquisition exceeded the applicable deal size threshold under
the terms of the Credit Facility. Pursuant to the fourth
amendment, the lenders consented to our acquisition of Molina
Medicaid Solutions.
Upon its effectiveness at the closing, the fourth amendment
increased the commitment fee on the total unused commitments of
the lenders under the facility to 50 basis points on all
levels of the pricing grid, with the pricing grid referring to
our ratio of consolidated funded debt to consolidated EBITDA.
The pricing for LIBOR loans and base rate loans was raised by
200 basis points at every level of the pricing grid. Thus,
the applicable margins now range between 2.75% and 3.75% for
LIBOR loans, and between 1.75% and 2.75% for base rate loans.
Until the delivery of a compliance certificate with respect to
our financial statements for the second quarter of 2010, the
applicable margin shall be fixed at 3.5% for LIBOR loans and
2.5% for base rate loans. In connection with the lenders
approval of the fourth amendment, a consent fee of 10 basis
points was paid on the amount of each consenting lenders
commitment. In addition, the fourth amendment carved out from
our indebtedness and restricted payment covenants under the
Credit Facility the $187.0 million current principal amount
of our convertible senior notes (although the
$187.0 million indebtedness is still included in the
calculation of our consolidated leverage ratio); increased the
amount of surety bond obligations we may incur; increased our
allowable capital expenditures; and reduced the fixed charge
coverage ratio from 3.50x to 2.75x (on a pro forma basis) at
December 31, 2009, and 3.00x thereafter.
On March 15, 2010, we agreed to enter into a fifth
amendment to the Credit Facility. The fifth amendment also
became effective upon the closing of the acquisition of Molina
Medicaid Solutions. The fifth amendment was required because,
after giving effect to the acquisition of Molina Medicaid
Solutions on a pro forma basis, and inclusive of our fourth
quarter 2009 EBITDA of only $5.9 million, our consolidated
leverage ratio for the preceding four fiscal quarters exceeded
the currently applicable ratio of 2.75 to 1.0. The fifth
amendment increased the maximum consolidated leverage ratio
under the Credit Facility to 3.25 to 1.0 for the fourth quarter
of 2009 (on a pro
23
forma basis), and to 3.50 to 1.0 for the first, second, and
third quarters of 2010, excluding the single date of
September 30, 2010. On September 30, 2010, the maximum
consolidated leverage ratio shall revert back to 2.75 to 1.0.
However, if we have actually reduced our consolidated leverage
ratio to no more than 2.75 to 1.0 on or before August 15,
2010, the consolidated leverage ratio under the Credit Facility
will revert back to 2.75 to 1.0 on August 15, 2010. On the
date that the consolidated leverage ratio reverts to 2.75 to
1.0 whether August 15, 2010 or
September 30, 2010 the aggregate commitments of
the lenders under the Credit Facility shall be reduced on a pro
rata basis from $200 million to $150 million. In
connection with the lenders approval of the fifth
amendment, we paid an amendment fee of 25 basis points on
the amount of each consenting lenders commitment. We will
also pay an incremental commitment fee of 12.5 basis points
based on each lenders unfunded commitment during the
period from the effective date of the fifth amendment through
the date that the maximum consolidated leverage ratio is reduced
to 2.75 to 1.0, plus a potential duration fee of 50 basis
points payable on August 15, 2010 in the event that the
consolidated leverage ratio has not been reduced to 2.75 to 1.0
by August 15, 2010. As of June 30, 2010, our
consolidated leverage ratio was 2.9%, as computed per the terms
of the Credit Facility.
Convertible
Senior Notes
In October 2007, we sold $200.0 million aggregate principal
amount of 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2014 (the
Notes). The sale of the Notes resulted in net
proceeds totaling $193.4 million. During 2009, we purchased
and retired $13.0 million face amount of the Notes, so the
remaining aggregate principal amount totaled $187.0 million
at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The Notes rank
equally in right of payment with our existing and future senior
indebtedness.
The Notes are convertible into cash and, under certain
circumstances, shares of our common stock. The initial
conversion rate is 21.3067 shares of our common stock per
one thousand dollar principal amount of the Notes. This
represents an initial conversion price of approximately $46.93
per share of our common stock. In addition, if certain corporate
transactions that constitute a change of control occur prior to
maturity, we will increase the conversion rate in certain
circumstances. Prior to July 2014, holders may convert their
Notes only under the following circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
During any fiscal quarter after our fiscal quarter ended
December 31, 2007, if the closing sale price per share of
our common stock, for each of at least 20 trading days during
the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last
trading day of the previous fiscal quarter, is greater than or
equal to 120% of the conversion price per share of our common
stock;
|
|
|
|
During the five business day period immediately following any
five consecutive trading day period in which the trading price
per one thousand dollar principal amount of the Notes for each
trading day of such period was less than 98% of the product of
the closing price per share of our common stock on such day and
the conversion rate in effect on such day; or
|
|
|
|
Upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions or other
specified events.
|
On or after July 1, 2014, holders may convert their Notes
at any time prior to the close of business on the scheduled
trading day immediately preceding the stated maturity date
regardless of whether any of the foregoing conditions is
satisfied.
We will deliver cash and shares of our common stock, if any,
upon conversion of each $1,000 principal amount of Notes, as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
An amount in cash (the principal return) equal to
the sum of, for each of the 20 Volume-Weighted Average Price
(VWAP) trading days during the conversion period, the lesser of
the daily conversion value for such VWAP trading day and fifty
dollars (representing 1/20th of one thousand
dollars); and
|
|
|
|
A number of shares based upon, for each of the 20 VWAP trading
days during the conversion period, any excess of the daily
conversion value above fifty dollars.
|
The proceeds from the issuance of such convertible debt
instruments have been allocated between a liability component
and an equity component. We have determined that the effective
interest rate of the Notes is 7.5%, principally based on the
seven-year U.S. treasury note rate as of the October 2007
issuance date, plus an appropriate
24
credit spread. The resulting debt discount is being amortized
over the period the Notes are expected to be outstanding, as
additional non-cash interest expense. As of June 30, 2010,
we expect the Notes to be outstanding until their
October 1, 2014 maturity date, for a remaining amortization
period of 51 months. The Notes if-converted value did
not exceed their principal amount as of June 30, 2010. At
June 30, 2010, the equity component of the Notes, net of
the impact of deferred taxes, was $24.0 million. The
following table provides the details of the liability amounts
recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Details of the liability component:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal amount
|
|
$
|
187,000
|
|
|
$
|
187,000
|
|
Unamortized discount
|
|
|
(25,591
|
)
|
|
|
(28,100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount
|
|
$
|
161,409
|
|
|
$
|
158,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest cost recognized for the period relating to the:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual interest coupon rate of 3.75%
|
|
$
|
1,753
|
|
|
$
|
1,753
|
|
|
$
|
3,506
|
|
|
$
|
3,570
|
|
Amortization of the discount on the liability component
|
|
|
1,266
|
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
2,509
|
|
|
|
2,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest cost recognized
|
|
$
|
3,019
|
|
|
$
|
2,925
|
|
|
$
|
6,015
|
|
|
$
|
5,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
The health care industry is subject to numerous laws and
regulations of federal, state, and local governments. Compliance
with these laws and regulations can be subject to government
review and interpretation, as well as regulatory actions unknown
and unasserted at this time. Penalties associated with
violations of these laws and regulations include significant
fines, exclusion from participating in publicly funded programs,
and the repayment of previously billed and collected revenues.
We are involved in various legal actions in the normal course of
business, some of which seek monetary damages, including claims
for punitive damages, which are not covered by insurance. These
actions, when finally concluded and determined, are not likely,
in our opinion, to have a material adverse effect on our
business, consolidated financial position, cash flows, or
results of operations.
Provider
Claims
Many of our medical contracts are complex in nature and may be
subject to differing interpretations regarding amounts due for
the provision of various services. Such differing
interpretations have led certain medical providers to pursue us
for additional compensation. The claims made by providers in
such circumstances often involve issues of contract compliance,
interpretation, payment methodology, and intent. These claims
often extend to services provided by the providers over a number
of years.
Various providers have contacted us seeking additional
compensation for claims that we believe to have been settled.
These matters, when finally concluded and determined, will not,
in our opinion, have a material adverse effect on our business,
consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash
flows.
Contract
Losses
Our MMIS service contracts with various states typically span
several years. These contracts often involve the development and
deployment of new computer systems and technologies. Substantial
performance risk exists in
25
each contract with these characteristics, and some or all
elements of service delivery under these contracts are dependent
upon successful completion of the design, development and
implementation phase. On occasion, these contracts have
experienced delays in their design, development and
implementation phase, the achievement of certain milestones has
been delayed, and costs in excess of those anticipated have been
incurred. We continuously review and reassess our estimates of
contract profitability. If our estimates indicate that a
contract loss will occur, a loss accrual is recorded in the
period it is first identified, if allowed by relevant accounting
guidance. Circumstances that could potentially result in
contract losses over the life of the contract include variances
from expected costs to deliver our services, and other factors
affecting revenues and costs. It is reasonably possible that
deferred costs associated with one or more of these contracts
could become impaired due to changes in estimates of future
contract cash flows.
Regulatory
Capital and Dividend Restrictions
Our principal operations are conducted through our health plan
subsidiaries operating in California, Florida, Michigan,
Missouri, New Mexico, Ohio, Texas, Utah, and Washington. Our
health plans are subject to state regulations that, among other
things, require the maintenance of minimum levels of statutory
capital, as defined by each state, and restrict the timing,
payment and amount of dividends and other distributions that may
be paid to us as the sole stockholder. To the extent the
subsidiaries must comply with these regulations, they may not
have the financial flexibility to transfer funds to us. The net
assets in these subsidiaries (after intercompany eliminations)
which may not be transferable to us in the form of loans,
advances or cash dividends was $362.3 million at
June 30, 2010, and $368.7 million at December 31,
2009. The National Association of Insurance Commissioners, or
NAIC, adopted rules effective December 31, 1998, which, if
implemented by the states, set new minimum capitalization
requirements for insurance companies, HMOs and other entities
bearing risk for health care coverage. The requirements take the
form of risk-based capital (RBC) rules. Michigan, Missouri, New
Mexico, Ohio, Texas, Washington, and Utah have adopted these
rules, which may vary from state to state. California and
Florida have not yet adopted NAIC risk-based capital
requirements for HMOs and have not formally given notice of
their intention to do so. Such requirements, if adopted by
California and Florida, may increase the minimum capital
required for those states.
As of June 30, 2010, our health plans had aggregate
statutory capital and surplus of approximately
$376.2 million compared with the required minimum aggregate
statutory capital and surplus of approximately
$253.2 million. All of our health plans were in compliance
with the minimum capital requirements at June 30, 2010. We
have the ability and commitment to provide additional capital to
each of our health plans when necessary to ensure that statutory
capital and surplus continue to meet regulatory requirements.
|
|
13.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
We have an equity investment in a medical service provider that
provides certain vision services to our members. We account for
this investment under the equity method of accounting because we
have an ownership interest in the investee that confers
significant influence over operating and financial policies of
the investee. As of both June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, our carrying amount for this investment
totaled $4.1 million. For the three months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009, we paid $5.3 million, and
$5.7 million, respectively, for medical service fees to
this provider. For the six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, we paid $9.7 million, and $10.4 million,
respectively, for medical service fees to this provider.
We are a party to a
fee-for-service
agreement with Pacific Hospital of Long Beach (Pacific
Hospital). Pacific Hospital is owned by Abrazos
Healthcare, Inc., the shares of which are held as community
property by the husband of Dr. Martha Bernadett, the sister
of Dr. J. Mario Molina, our Chief Executive Officer, and
John Molina, our Chief Financial Officer. Amounts paid to
Pacific Hospital under the terms of this
fee-for-service
agreement were $0.5 million, and $0.3 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. We
believe that the
fee-for-service
with Pacific Hospital is based on prevailing market rates for
similar services.
26
Wisconsin
Health Plan Acquisition
On July 12, 2010, we announced a definitive agreement to
acquire Abri Health Plan, a provider of Medicaid managed care
services to BadgerCare Plus and SSI Managed Care enrollees in
Wisconsin. Abri Health Plan currently serves Medicaid
beneficiaries in 23 counties in Wisconsin. In April 2010, Abri
received a notice of intent to award a new contract to provide
Medicaid managed care services to BadgerCare Plus enrollees in
Wisconsins southeast region (Kenosha, Milwaukee, Ozaukee,
Racine, Washington, and Waukesha counties), to be implemented
between September 1 and November 1, 2010.
The purchase price for the acquisition is expected to be
approximately $16 million, subject to adjustments, and will
be funded with available cash
and/or the
Credit Facility. Subject to regulatory approvals and the
satisfaction of other closing conditions, the closing of the
transaction is expected to occur by August 31, 2010.
Auction
Rate Securities
In the fourth quarter of 2008, we entered into a rights
agreement with an investment securities firm that
(1) allowed us to exercise rights (the Rights)
to sell the eligible auction rate securities at par value to
this firm between June 30, 2010 and July 2, 2012, and
(2) gave the investment securities firm the right to
purchase the auction rate securities from us any time after the
agreement date as long as we received the par value. On
June 30, 2010, we began to exercise the Rights, and
completed sales of all of the eligible auction rate securities
under the Rights agreement on July 1, 2010. By the close of
business on July 1, 2010, we had sold all of our auction
rate securities that were designated as trading securities as of
June 30, 2010. At June 30, 2010, these securities had
a par value of $15.9 million and a fair value of
$14.6 million. We sold these securities at par value on
July 1, 2010, while simultaneously extinguishing our
auction rate securities rights (valued at $1.3 million as
of June 30, 2010). The impact on net income of the sale of
the action rate securities on July 1, 2010 was not
significant.
27
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
Forward
Looking Statements
This quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, or Securities
Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, or Securities Exchange Act. All statements, other than
statements of historical facts, included in this quarterly
report may be deemed to be forward-looking statements for
purposes of the Securities Act and the Securities Exchange Act.
We use the words anticipate(s),
believe(s), estimate(s),
expect(s), intend(s), may,
plan(s), project(s), will,
would, and similar expressions to identify
forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking
statements contain these identifying words. We cannot guarantee
that we will actually achieve the plans, intentions, or
expectations disclosed in our forward-looking statements and,
accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on our
forward-looking statements. There are a number of important
factors that could cause actual results or events to differ
materially from the forward-looking statements that we make. You
should read these factors and the other cautionary statements as
being applicable to all related forward-looking statements
wherever they appear in this quarterly report. We caution you
that we do not undertake any obligation to update
forward-looking statements made by us. Forward-looking
statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties
that may cause our actual results in future periods to differ
materially from those projected, estimated, expected, or
contemplated as a result of, but not limited to, risk factors
related to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
budgetary pressures on the federal and state governments and
their resulting inability to fully fund Medicaid, Medicare,
or CHIP, or to maintain current payment rates, benefit packages,
or membership eligibility thresholds and criteria;
|
|
|
|
uncertainties regarding the impact of the recently enacted
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, including the
funding provisions related to health plans, and uncertainties
regarding the likely impact of other federal or state health
care and insurance reform measures;
|
|
|
|
management of our medical costs, including rates of utilization
that are consistent with our expectations;
|
|
|
|
the accurate estimation of incurred but not reported medical
costs across our health plans;
|
|
|
|
the continuation and renewal of the government contracts of our
health plans;
|
|
|
|
the integration of Molina Medicaid Solutions, including its
employees, systems, and operations;
|
|
|
|
the retention and renewal of the Molina Medicaid Solutions
state government contracts on terms consistent with our
expectations;
|
|
|
|
the accuracy of our operating cost and capital outlay
projections for Molina Medicaid Solutions;
|
|
|
|
the timing of receipt and recognition of revenue under our
various state contracts held by Molina Medicaid Solutions,
including any changes to the anticipated start date of operation
at our Maine location;
|
|
|
|
cost recovery efforts by the state of Michigan from Michigan
health plans with respect to allegedly incorrect statewide rates
and enrollment errors;
|
|
|
|
governmental audits and reviews;
|
|
|
|
the establishment of a federal or state medical cost expenditure
floor as a percentage of the premiums we receive;
|
|
|
|
the required establishment of a premium deficiency reserve in
any of the states in which we operate;
|
|
|
|
up-coding by providers or billing in a manner at material
variance with historic patterns;
|
|
|
|
approval by state regulators of dividends and distributions by
our subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
changes in funding under our contracts as a result of regulatory
changes, programmatic adjustments, or other reforms;
|
|
|
|
high dollar claims related to catastrophic illness;
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
the favorable resolution of litigation or arbitration matters;
|
|
|
|
restrictions and covenants in our credit facility;
|
|
|
|
the success of our efforts to leverage our administrative costs
to address the needs associated with increased enrollment;
|
|
|
|
the relatively small number of states in which we operate health
plans and the impact on the consolidated entity of adverse
developments in any single health plan;
|
|
|
|
the availability of financing to fund and capitalize our
acquisitions and
start-up
activities and to meet our liquidity needs;
|
|
|
|
retroactive adjustments to premium revenue or accounting
estimates which require adjustment based upon subsequent
developments;
|
|
|
|
a states failure to renew its federal Medicaid waiver;
|
|
|
|
an unauthorized disclosure of confidential member information;
|
|
|
|
changes generally affecting the managed care or Medicaid
management information system industries; and
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions, including unemployment rates.
|
Investors should refer to Part I, Item 1A of our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, and to Part II,
Item 1A Risk Factors, in our Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, and in this Quarterly
Report, for a discussion of certain risk factors that could
materially affect our business, financial condition, cash flows,
or results of operations. Given these risks and uncertainties,
we can give no assurances that any results or events projected
or contemplated by our forward-looking statements will in fact
occur and we caution investors not to place undue reliance on
these statements.
This document and the following discussion of our financial
condition and results of operations should be read in
conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial
statements and the notes to those statements appearing elsewhere
in this report and the audited financial statements and
Managements Discussion and Analysis appearing in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Reclassifications
Effective January 1, 2010, we have recorded the Michigan
modified gross receipts tax, or MGRT, as a premium tax and not
as an income tax. Prior periods have been reclassified to
conform to this presentation.
In prior periods, general and administrative, or G&A,
expenses have included premium tax expenses. Beginning with the
three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2010, we
have reported premium tax expenses on a separate line in the
accompanying consolidated statements of income. Prior periods
have been reclassified to conform to this presentation.
Overview
Molina Healthcare, Inc. is a multi-state managed care
organization that arranges for the delivery of health care
services to persons eligible for Medicaid, Medicare, and other
government-sponsored health care programs for low-income
families and individuals. We conduct our business primarily
through licensed health plans in the states of California,
Florida, Michigan, Missouri, New Mexico, Ohio, Texas, Utah, and
Washington. The health plans are locally operated by our
respective wholly owned subsidiaries in those states, each of
which is licensed as a health maintenance organization, or HMO.
On May 1, 2010, we acquired a health information management
business which we now operate under the name, Molina Medicaid
SolutionsSM.
Molina Medicaid Solutions provides design, development,
implementation, and business process outsourcing solutions to
state governments for their Medicaid Management Information
Systems, or MMIS. MMIS is a core tool used to support the
administration of state Medicaid and other health care
entitlement programs. Molina Medicaid Solutions currently holds
MMIS contracts with the states of Idaho,
29
Louisiana, Maine, New Jersey, and West Virginia, as well as a
contract to provide drug rebate administration services for the
Florida Medicaid program. We paid $131.3 million to acquire
Molina Medicaid Solutions, subject to working capital
adjustments which we expect to be insignificant. The acquisition
was funded with available cash of $26 million and
$105 million drawn under our credit facility.
With the addition of Molina Medicaid Solutions, we have added a
segment to our internal financial reporting structure in 2010.
We will now report our financial performance based on the
following two reportable segments:
|
|
|
|
|
Health Plans; and
|
|
|
|
Molina Medicaid Solutions.
|
Health
Plans Segment
Our Health Plans segment derives its revenue, in the form of
premiums, chiefly from Medicaid contracts with the states in
which our health plans operate. The majority of medical costs
associated with premium revenues are risk-based
costs while the health plans receive fixed per
member per month premium payments from the states, the health
plans are at risk for the costs of their members health
care. Our Health Plans segment operates in a highly regulated
environment with minimum capitalization requirements. These
capitalization requirements, among other things, limit the
health plans ability to pay dividends to us without
regulatory approval.
As of June 30, 2010, our health plans were located in
California, Florida, Michigan, Missouri, New Mexico, Ohio,
Texas, Utah, and Washington. Additionally, we operate three
county primary care clinics in Virginia. An overview of our
health plans and their principal governmental program contracts
with the relevant state health care agency is provided below:
|
|
|
|
|
State
|
|
Renewal Date
|
|
Contract Description or Covered Program
|
|
California
|
|
3-31-12
|
|
Subcontract with Health Net for services to Medi-Cal members
under Health Nets Los Angeles County Two-Plan Model
Medi-Cal contract with the California Department of Health
Services (DHS).
|
California
|
|
12-31-12
|
|
Medi-Cal contract for Sacramento Geographic Managed Care Program
with DHS.
|
California
|
|
3-31-11
|
|
Two Plan Model Medi-Cal contract for Riverside and
San Bernardino Counties (Inland Empire) with DHS.
|
California
|
|
9-30-10
|
|
Medi-Cal contract for San Diego Geographic Managed Care
Program with DHS.
|
California
|
|
9-30-10
|
|
Healthy Families contract (Californias CHIP program) with
California Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board (MRMIB).
|
Florida
|
|
8-31-12
|
|
Medicaid contract with the Florida Agency for Health Care
Administration.
|
Michigan
|
|
9-30-12
|
|
Medicaid contract with state of Michigan.
|
Missouri
|
|
6-30-11
|
|
Medicaid contract with the Missouri Department of Social
Services.
|
New Mexico
|
|
6-30-12
|
|
Salud! Medicaid Managed Care Program contract (including CHIP)
with New Mexico Human Services Department (HSD).
|
Ohio
|
|
6-30-11
|
|
Medicaid contract with Ohio Department of Job and Family
Services (ODJFS).
|
Texas
|
|
8-31-13
|
|
Medicaid contract with Texas Health and Human Services
Commission (HHSC).
|
Utah
|
|
6-30-14
|
|
Medicaid contract with Utah Department of Health.
|
Utah
|
|
12-31-11
|
|
CHIP contract with Utah Department of Health.
|
Washington
|
|
12-31-10
|
|
Basic Health Plan and Basic Health Plus Programs contract with
Washington State Health Care Authority (HCA).
|
Washington
|
|
6-30-11
|
|
Healthy Options Program (including Medicaid and CHIP) contract
with state of Washington Department of Social and Health
Services.
|
30
In addition to the foregoing, our health plans in California,
Michigan, New Mexico, Ohio, Texas, Utah, and Washington have
entered into a standardized form of contract with CMS with
respect to their operation of a MA SNP, and our health plans in
California, Michigan, New Mexico, Ohio, Texas, Utah, and
Washington have also entered into a standardized form of
contract with CMS with respect to their operations of a MA-PD
plan. These contracts are renewed annually and were most
recently renewed as of January 1, 2010.
Our health plan subsidiaries have generally been successful in
obtaining the renewal of their contracts in each state prior to
the expiration of the contract. However, there can be no
assurance that these contracts will continue to be renewed. In
addition, in the event a state Medicaid agency issues a Request
for Proposals, or RFP, in connection with a new Medicaid
contract award, our incumbent health plan could potentially be
unsuccessful and lose its contract to a competitive health plan
bidder. We do not anticipate the issuance of any RFPs with
respect to any of our health plan contracts in 2010.
The PMPM rates the states pay to our health plans change from
time to time. We are expecting a blended PMPM rate increase at
our Utah health plan of approximately 8% effective July 1,
2010; a blended PMPM rate decrease at our Texas health plan of
approximately 1% effective September 1, 2010; and a blended
PMPM rate increase at our California health plan of
approximately 2% effective October 1, 2010. However, no
assurances can be given that these expected rate adjustments
will be obtained.
Molina
Medicaid Solutions Segment
Unlike the Health Plans segment, the Molina Medicaid Solutions
segment is a service-based business that adds to our revenue
stream without assuming additional medical cost risk. Although
revenue for the Health Plans segment far exceeded that of the
Molina Medicaid Solutions segment for the three months ended
June 30, 2010, operating income as a percent of revenue for
the Molina Medicaid Solutions segment far exceeded that of the
Health Plans segment for that period. For example, the Molina
Medicaid Solutions segment reported revenue of
$21.1 million and an operating profit of $5 million
for the two months of its operations that were included in our
results for the three months ended June 30, 2010,
representing an operating profit margin percentage of 24%. Over
the course of three months of operations included in that same
reporting period, our Health Plans segment reported revenue of
$976.7 million and an operating profit of
$16.2 million, representing an operating profit margin
percentage of 2%. Although we expect the operating profit margin
percentage of our Molina Medicaid Solutions segment to decline
as our Idaho and Maine contracts commence full operations, we
nevertheless believe that the operating profit margin percentage
of that segment will remain significantly greater than that of
the Health Plans segment, albeit on a much lower revenue base.
Additionally, the capital requirements of the Molina Medicaid
Solutions segment are except in the case of new
contract
start-ups
considerably less than those of our Health Plans segment.
Regulatory approval is not required for the Molina Medicaid
Solutions segment to pay dividends to us.
While we believe that the acquisition of the Molina Medicaid
Solutions segment diversifies our risk profile, we also believe
that the two segments are complementary from strategic and
operating perspectives. From a strategic perspective, both
segments allow us to participate in an expanding sector of the
economy while continuing our mission to serve low-income
families and individuals eligible for government-sponsored
health care programs. Operationally, the segments share a common
systems platform allowing for efficiencies of
scale and common experience in meeting the needs of
state Medicaid programs. We also believe that we have
opportunities to market various cost containment and quality
practices used by our Health Plans segment (such as care
management and care coordination programs) to state MMIS
customers who wish to incorporate certain aspects of managed
care programs into their own
fee-for-service
programs.
The following table briefly summarizes our financial performance
for the three month and six month periods ended June 30,
2010 compared with the same periods in 2009. All ratios, with
the exception of the medical care
31
ratio, are shown as a percentage of total revenue. The medical
care ratio is shown as a percentage of premium revenue because
there is a direct relationship between the premium revenue
earned and the cost of health care.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Earnings per diluted share
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
$
|
1.02
|
|
Premium revenue
|
|
$
|
976,685
|
|
|
$
|
925,507
|
|
|
$
|
1,941,905
|
|
|
$
|
1,782,991
|
|
Service revenue
|
|
$
|
21,054
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,054
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
21,178
|
|
|
$
|
19,488
|
|
|
$
|
41,616
|
|
|
$
|
42,649
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
10,579
|
|
|
$
|
14,565
|
|
|
$
|
21,169
|
|
|
$
|
26,776
|
|
Total ending membership
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
|
|
1,368
|
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
|
|
1,368
|
|
Premium revenue
|
|
|
97.7
|
%
|
|
|
99.8
|
%
|
|
|
98.8
|
%
|
|
|
99.7
|
%
|
Service revenue
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical care ratio
|
|
|
86.0
|
%
|
|
|
86.8
|
%
|
|
|
85.6
|
%
|
|
|
86.4
|
%
|
General and administrative expense ratio
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
Premium tax ratio
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
Operating income
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
Net income
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
38.1
|
%
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
|
|
38.0
|
%
|
|
|
25.6
|
%
|
Composition
of Revenue and Membership
Health
Plans Segment
Premium revenue is fixed in advance of the periods covered and,
except as described in Critical Accounting Policies
below, is not generally subject to significant accounting
estimates. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, we
received approximately 94% of our premium revenue as a fixed
amount per member per month, or PMPM, pursuant to our Medicaid
contracts with state agencies, our Medicare contracts with the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, and our
contracts with other managed care organizations for which we
operate as a subcontractor. These premium revenues are
recognized in the month that members are entitled to receive
health care services. The state Medicaid programs and the
federal Medicare program periodically adjust premium rates.
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, we received
approximately 6% of our premium revenue in the form of
birth income a one-time payment for the
delivery of a child from the Medicaid programs in
California (effective October 1, 2009), Michigan, Missouri,
Ohio, Texas, Utah (effective September 1, 2009), and
Washington. Such payments are recognized as revenue in the month
the birth occurs.
32
The following table sets forth the approximate total number of
members by state health plan as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Total Ending Membership by Health Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California
|
|
|
348,000
|
|
|
|
351,000
|
|
|
|
349,000
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
29,000
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
226,000
|
|
|
|
223,000
|
|
|
|
207,000
|
|
Missouri
|
|
|
78,000
|
|
|
|
78,000
|
|
|
|
78,000
|
|
New Mexico
|
|
|
93,000
|
|
|
|
94,000
|
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
Ohio
|
|
|
234,000
|
|
|
|
216,000
|
|
|
|
203,000
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
Utah
|
|
|
77,000
|
|
|
|
69,000
|
|
|
|
64,000
|
|
Washington
|
|
|
346,000
|
|
|
|
334,000
|
|
|
|
323,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,498,000
|
|
|
|
1,455,000
|
|
|
|
1,368,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Ending Membership by State for our Medicare Advantage
Plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California
|
|
|
3,600
|
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
3,300
|
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
New Mexico
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
Utah
|
|
|
8,100
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
3,100
|
|
Washington
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
20,300
|
|
|
|
11,600
|
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Ending Membership by State for our Aged, Blind or
Disabled Population:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California
|
|
|
13,600
|
|
|
|
13,900
|
|
|
|
13,100
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
9,300
|
|
|
|
8,800
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
31,600
|
|
|
|
32,200
|
|
|
|
29,900
|
|
New Mexico
|
|
|
5,800
|
|
|
|
5,700
|
|
|
|
5,700
|
|
Ohio
|
|
|
27,400
|
|
|
|
22,600
|
|
|
|
19,700
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
18,500
|
|
|
|
17,600
|
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
Utah
|
|
|
7,600
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
7,600
|
|
Washington
|
|
|
3,700
|
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
117,500
|
|
|
|
111,500
|
|
|
|
102,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Molina
Medicaid Solutions Segment
As a result of our recent acquisition of Molina Medicaid
Solutions, a portion of our revenues is derived from service
arrangements. This segment provides technology solutions to
state Medicaid programs that include system design, development,
implementation, and technology outsourcing services. In
addition, this segment offer business process outsourcing to
state Medicaid agencies that handle key administrative functions
such as claims processing, provider enrollment, pharmacy drug
rebate services, recipient eligibility management, and
pre-authorization services. In general, we expect the operating
profit margin percentage generated by the Molina Medicaid
Solutions segment to be higher than the operating profit margin
percentage generated by the Health Plans segment. See further
discussion of our Molina Medicaid Solutions segment revenue
recognition and deferred contract costs at Critical
Accounting Policies, below.
Molina Medicaid Solutions has contracts with five states to
design, develop, implement, maintain, and operate Medicaid
Management Information Systems (MMIS). Additionally, Molina
Medicaid Solutions provides pharmacy rebate administration
services under a contract with the state of Florida.
33
These contracts extend over a number of years, and cover the
life of the MMIS from inception though at least the first five
years of its operation. The contracts are subject to extension
by the exercise of an option, and also by renewal of the base
contract. The contracts have a life cycle beginning with the
design, development, and implementation of the MMIS and
continuing through the operation of the system. Payment during
the design, development, and implementation phase of the
contract, or the DDI phase, is generally based upon the
attainment of specific milestones in systems development as
agreed upon ahead of time by the parties. Payment during the
operations phase typically takes the form of either a flat
monthly fee or payment for specific measures of capacity or
activity, such as the number of claims processed, or the number
of Medicaid beneficiaries served by the MMIS. Contracts may also
call for the adjustment of amounts paid if certain activity
measures exceed or fall below certain thresholds.
Under our contracts in Louisiana, New Jersey, West Virginia and
Florida we provide primarily business process outsourcing and
technology outsourcing services, because the development of the
MMIS solution has been completed. Under these contracts, we
recognize outsourcing service revenue on a straight-line basis
over the remaining term of the contract. We have not
substantially completed the installation of the MMIS solutions
in Idaho and Maine. Accordingly, we have deferred recognition
and all revenue and the majority of the expenses incurred under
those contracts.
Composition
of Expenses
Health
Plans Segment
Operating expenses for the Health Plans segment include expenses
related to the provision of medical care services, G&A
expenses, and premium tax expenses. Our results of operations
are impacted by our ability to effectively manage expenses
related to medical care services and to accurately estimate
costs incurred. Expenses related to medical care services are
captured in the following four categories:
|
|
|
|
|
Fee-for-service
expenses paid for specific encounters or episodes of care
according to a fee schedule or other basis established by the
state or by contract with the provider.
|
|
|
|
Capitation expenses for PMPM payments to the
provider without regard to the frequency, extent, or nature of
the medical services actually furnished.
|
|
|
|
Pharmacy expenses for all drug, injectible, and
immunization costs paid through our pharmacy benefit manager.
|
|
|
|
Other expenses for medically related administrative
costs ($41.0 million and $35.8 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively), certain
provider incentive costs, reinsurance, costs to operate our
medical clinics, and other medical expenses.
|
Our medical care costs include amounts that have been paid by us
through the reporting date as well as estimated liabilities for
medical care costs incurred but not paid by us as of the
reporting date. See Critical Accounting Policies
below for a comprehensive discussion of how we estimate such
liabilities.
Molina
Medicaid Solutions Segment
Cost of service revenue consists primarily of the costs incurred
to provide business process outsourcing and technology
outsourcing services under our contracts in Louisiana, New
Jersey, West Virginia and Florida, as well as certain selling,
general and administrative expenses. Additionally, certain
indirect costs incurred under our contracts in Idaho and Maine
are also expensed to cost of services.
Deferred contract costs, which primarily relate to our contracts
in Idaho and Maine, include direct and incremental costs such as
direct labor, hardware, and software. We also defer and
subsequently amortize certain transition costs related to
activities that transition the contract from the design,
development, and implementation phase to the operational or
business process outsourcing phase. Deferred contract costs,
including transition costs, are amortized on a straight-line
basis over the remaining original contract term, consistent with
the revenue recognition period.
34
Results
of Operations
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared with the Three Months
Ended June 30, 2009
Summary
of Consolidated Operating Results
Operating results for the three months ended June 30, 2010,
compared with the three months ended June 30, 2009, were
most significantly impacted by the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Increased premium revenue for the Health Plans segment due to
higher enrollment, partially offset by lower revenue PMPM.
Medicare enrollment exceeded 20,000 members at June 30,
2010, and Medicare premium revenue for the three months ended
June 30, 2010, was $67.6 million compared with
$35.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
Lower PMPM medical costs for the Health Plan segment due to
lower incidence of influenza-related illnesses in 2010, improved
hospital utilization, the transfer of pharmacy costs back to the
states of Ohio and Missouri, and the implementation of various
contracting and medical management initiatives. Medical margin
(defined as the difference between premium revenue and medical
costs) increased by approximately $15 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2010, compared with the three months
ended June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
Higher administrative and premium tax expenses for the Health
Plan segment, driven in part by the cost of our Medicare
expansion and the acquisition of the Molina Medicaid Solutions
business.
|
|
|
|
The acquisition of Molina Medicaid Solutions effective
May 1, 2010. The Molina Medicaid Solutions segment
contributed $5 million to operating income for the three
months ended June 30, 2010.
|
Health
Plans Segment
Summary
of Health Plans Segment Operating Results
Operating income for the three months ended June 30, 2010
decreased $3.3 million compared with the three months ended
June 30, 2009. Improved medical margins during the three
months ended June 30, 2010 were more than offset by:
|
|
|
|
|
$5.5 million in premium reductions retroactive to
October 1, 2009 that were imposed by the state of Michigan;
|
|
|
|
$1.7 million in acquisition costs related to the purchase
of Molina Medicaid Solutions;
|
|
|
|
$4.7 million in additional premium tax; and
|
|
|
|
$10.4 million of additional administrative expense.
|
Premium
Revenue
Premium revenue grew 5.5% in the three months ended
June 30, 2010 compared with the three months ended
June 30, 2009, due to a membership increase of nearly 10%.
Premium revenue was reduced during the three months ended
June 30, 2010 by $5.5 million due to rate reductions
in Michigan that were retroactive to October 1, 2009. The
related reduction to medical expense was only $0.5 million.
On a PMPM basis consolidated premium revenue decreased 4.4%
because of declines in premium rates at several of our health
plans. The most significant declines in premium rates were in
Ohio and Missouri, due to the transfer of pharmacy risk back to
the states, and in Washington. Washington premiums PMPM were
lower during the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared
with the three months ended June 30, 2009, as result of
reductions made to both Medicaid premiums and fee schedules
during the third quarter of 2009.
35
Medical
Care Costs
The following table provides the details of consolidated medical
care costs for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands
except PMPM amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
PMPM
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
PMPM
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fee for service
|
|
$
|
594,960
|
|
|
$
|
132.95
|
|
|
|
70.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
517,066
|
|
|
$
|
127.59
|
|
|
|
64.4
|
%
|
Capitation
|
|
|
136,764
|
|
|
|
30.56
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
154,386
|
|
|
|
38.10
|
|
|
|
19.2
|
|
Pharmacy
|
|
|
75,170
|
|
|
|
16.80
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
99,256
|
|
|
|
24.49
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
Other
|
|
|
32,719
|
|
|
|
7.31
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
32,498
|
|
|
|
8.02
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
839,613
|
|
|
$
|
187.62
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
803,206
|
|
|
$
|
198.20
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical care costs, in the aggregate, decreased 5.3% on a PMPM
basis for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared
with the three months ended June 30, 2009, primarily due to
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The transfer of pharmacy risk back to the states of Ohio and
Missouri,
|
|
|
|
A less severe flu season in 2010,
|
|
|
|
Reductions in Medicaid fee schedules subsequent to June 30,
2009, and
|
|
|
|
The implementation of various contracting and medical management
initiatives.
|
Excluding pharmacy costs, medical care costs decreased 1.7% on a
PMPM basis for the three months ended June 30, 2010
compared with the three months ended June 30, 2009. Medical
care costs as a percentage of premium revenue (the medical care
ratio) were 86.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2010
compared with 86.8% for the three months ended June 30,
2009.
Physician and outpatient costs increased 1.9% on a PMPM basis
for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared with the
three months ended June 30, 2009. Although we continued to
observe hospitals billing for more intensive levels of care for
the quarter ended June 30, 2010, compared with the quarter
ended June 30, 2009, emergency room costs PMPM were stable
as both utilization and cost per visit remained essentially
unchanged. We attribute stable emergency room costs to, among
other things, a less severe flu season when compared with 2009;
changes in provider contracts and fee schedules; and our efforts
to reduce inappropriate utilization.
Inpatient facility costs increased 6.4% on a PMPM basis for the
three months ended June 30, 2010, compared with the three
months ended June 30, 2009. Both utilization and unit costs
increased slightly compared with the three months ended
June 30, 2009.
Pharmacy costs (including the benefit of rebates) decreased
31.4% on a PMPM basis for the three months ended June 30,
2010, including our Missouri and Ohio health plans. The pharmacy
benefit was transferred to the state of Missouri effective
October 1, 2009, and was transferred to the state of Ohio
effective February 1, 2010. Excluding these health plans,
pharmacy costs increased 5.8% on a PMPM basis compared with the
three months ended June 30, 2009 as a result of increases
in unit costs that more than offset decreases in utilization.
Capitated costs decreased 19.8% on a PMPM basis compared with
three months ended June 30, 2009 as a result of the
recognition, in the three months ended June 30, 2009, of
$22 million in retroactive capitation expense at the New
Mexico health plan that related to 2009 and 2008. The
retroactive capitation expense at the New Mexico health plan was
directly related to the receipt of $25.3 million in
retroactive premium revenue in the second quarter of 2009. There
was no corresponding retroactive adjustment in the three months
ended June 30, 2010.
36
Health
Plans Segment Operating Data
The following table summarizes member months, premium revenue,
medical care costs, medical care ratio and premium taxes by
health plan for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and
June 30, 2009 (dollar amounts in thousands except for PMPM
amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Premium Revenue
|
|
|
Medical Care Costs
|
|
|
Medical
|
|
|
Premium Tax
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
PMPM
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
PMPM
|
|
|
Care Ratio
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
California
|
|
|
1,050,000
|
|
|
$
|
124,551
|
|
|
$
|
118.57
|
|
|
$
|
106,006
|
|
|
$
|
100.92
|
|
|
|
85.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,637
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
160,000
|
|
|
|
41,462
|
|
|
|
260.32
|
|
|
|
39,134
|
|
|
|
245.70
|
|
|
|
94.4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
679,000
|
|
|
|
156,769
|
|
|
|
230.76
|
|
|
|
135,763
|
|
|
|
199.84
|
|
|
|
86.6
|
|
|
|
9,711
|
|
Missouri
|
|
|
234,000
|
|
|
|
51,779
|
|
|
|
220.86
|
|
|
|
46,320
|
|
|
|
197.58
|
|
|
|
89.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Mexico
|
|
|
280,000
|
|
|
|
91,949
|
|
|
|
328.48
|
|
|
|
73,210
|
|
|
|
261.54
|
|
|
|
79.6
|
|
|
|
2,987
|
|
Ohio
|
|
|
695,000
|
|
|
|
212,669
|
|
|
|
306.34
|
|
|
|
174,275
|
|
|
|
251.03
|
|
|
|
82.0
|
|
|
|
16,512
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
43,493
|
|
|
|
348.45
|
|
|
|
39,133
|
|
|
|
313.52
|
|
|
|
90.0
|
|
|
|
705
|
|
Utah
|
|
|
230,000
|
|
|
|
64,934
|
|
|
|
281.44
|
|
|
|
60,975
|
|
|
|
264.28
|
|
|
|
93.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington
|
|
|
1,022,000
|
|
|
|
186,204
|
|
|
|
182.23
|
|
|
|
154,792
|
|
|
|
151.49
|
|
|
|
83.1
|
|
|
|
3,394
|
|
Other(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,475,000
|
|
|
$
|
976,685
|
|
|
$
|
218.25
|
|
|
$
|
839,613
|
|
|
$
|
187.62
|
|
|
|
86.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
34,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Premium Revenue
|
|
|
Medical Care Costs
|
|
|
Medical
|
|
|
Premium Tax
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
PMPM
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
PMPM
|
|
|
Care Ratio
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
California
|
|
|
1,031,000
|
|
|
$
|
121,918
|
|
|
$
|
118.23
|
|
|
$
|
111,750
|
|
|
$
|
108.37
|
|
|
|
91.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,395
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
19,339
|
|
|
|
257.22
|
|
|
|
17,355
|
|
|
|
230.83
|
|
|
|
89.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
623,000
|
|
|
|
136,549
|
|
|
|
219.44
|
|
|
|
112,402
|
|
|
|
180.64
|
|
|
|
82.3
|
|
|
|
9,538
|
|
Missouri
|
|
|
232,000
|
|
|
|
58,141
|
|
|
|
251.06
|
|
|
|
48,582
|
|
|
|
209.78
|
|
|
|
83.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Mexico
|
|
|
251,000
|
|
|
|
114,408
|
|
|
|
456.80
|
|
|
|
100,255
|
|
|
|
400.30
|
|
|
|
87.6
|
|
|
|
2,989
|
|
Ohio
|
|
|
596,000
|
|
|
|
194,885
|
|
|
|
327.02
|
|
|
|
168,639
|
|
|
|
282.98
|
|
|
|
86.5
|
|
|
|
10,731
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
92,000
|
|
|
|
34,345
|
|
|
|
372.13
|
|
|
|
24,851
|
|
|
|
269.26
|
|
|
|
72.4
|
|
|
|
572
|
|
Utah
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
57,918
|
|
|
|
288.99
|
|
|
|
53,182
|
|
|
|
265.35
|
|
|
|
91.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington
|
|
|
952,000
|
|
|
|
183,720
|
|
|
|
192.96
|
|
|
|
156,981
|
|
|
|
164.88
|
|
|
|
85.5
|
|
|
|
3,064
|
|
Other(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,052,000
|
|
|
$
|
925,507
|
|
|
$
|
228.38
|
|
|
$
|
803,206
|
|
|
$
|
198.20
|
|
|
|
86.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
30,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Other medical care costs represent primarily
medically related administrative costs at the parent company. |
Days
in Medical Claims and Benefits Payable
Beginning January 1, 2010, and for all prior periods
presented, we are reporting days in medical claims and benefits
payable relating to
fee-for-service
medical claims only. This new computation includes only
fee-for-service
medical care costs and related liabilities, and therefore
calculates the extent of reserves for those liabilities that are
most subject to estimation risk.
The days in medical claims and benefits payable amount
previously reported included all medical care costs
(fee-for-service,
capitation, pharmacy, and administrative), and all
medical claims liabilities, including those liabilities that
are typically paid concurrently, or shortly after the costs are
incurred, such as capitation costs and pharmacy costs. Medical
claims liabilities in this calculation do not include accrued
costs such as salaries associated with
the administrative portion of medical costs.
37
By including only
fee-for-service
medical costs and liabilities in this computation, our days in
claims payable metric will be more indicative of the adequacy of
our reserves for liabilities subject to a substantial degree of
estimation. The days in medical claims and benefits payable
computed under each method were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
Days in claims payable
fee-for-service
only
|
|
|
44 days
|
|
|
|
44 days
|
|
|
|
44 days
|
|
|
|
47 days
|
|
Days in claims payable all medical costs
|
|
|
39 days
|
|
|
|
37 days
|
|
|
|
37 days
|
|
|
|
39 days
|
|
Number of claims in inventory at end of period
|
|
|
106,300
|
|
|
|
153,700
|
|
|
|
93,100
|
|
|
|
117,100
|
|
Billed charges of claims in inventory at end of period (dollars
in thousands)
|
|
$
|
146,600
|
|
|
$
|
194,000
|
|
|
$
|
131,400
|
|
|
$
|
173,400
|
|
Molina
Medicaid Solutions Segment
Performance of the Molina Medicaid Solutions segment for the two
months ended June 30, 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Service revenue
|
|
$
|
22,645
|
|
Amortization of purchased intangibles recorded as contra-service
revenue
|
|
|
(1,591
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net service revenue
|
|
|
21,054
|
|
Cost of service revenue
|
|
|
14,254
|
|
General and administrative costs
|
|
|
966
|
|
Amortization of purchased intangibles recorded as amortization
expense
|
|
|
829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
5,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Expenses
General
and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses, or G&A, were
$78.1 million, or 7.8% of total revenue, for the three
months ended June 30, 2010, compared with
$65.0 million, or 7.0% of total revenue, for the for the
three months ended June 30, 2009.
The increase in the G&A ratio was primarily due to higher
administrative expenses for the Health Plans segment, which
includes all corporate related administrative costs. Costs of
the continuing build out of our Medicare administrative
structure added $2.7 million to administrative costs when
compared with the three months ended June 30, 2009.
Acquisition expenses associated with the purchase of Molina
Medicaid Solutions were $1.7 million during the three
months ended June 30, 2010. Network and product expansions
other than the Medicare line of business added $1.1 million
to administrative expense during the three months ended
June 30, 2010. All other Health Plans segment
administrative costs increased $6.5 million during the
three months ended June 30, 2010. The cost of services
shared between the Health Plans and Molina Medicaid Solutions
segments is charged to the Health Plans segment. A portion of
the $6.5 million increase in other administrative costs
recorded at the Health Plans segment supported the integration
of Molina Medicaid Solutions into our consolidated operations.
Stand- alone administrative expenses of the Molina Medicaid
Solutions segment totaled approximately $1.0 million.
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Medicare-related administrative costs
|
|
$
|
6,589
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,879
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Non Medicare-related administrative costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Molina Medicaid Solutions segment administrative costs
|
|
|
966
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Molina Medicaid Solutions acquisition costs
|
|
|
1,724
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Plans segment administrative payroll, including employee
incentive compensation
|
|
|
53,675
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
49,317
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
All other Health Plans segment administrative expense
|
|
|
15,125
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
11,815
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G&A expenses
|
|
$
|
78,079
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
65,011
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium
Tax Expenses
Premium tax expense relating to Health Plans segment premium
revenue increased to 3.6% of revenue for the three months ended
June 30, 2010, from 3.3% for the three months ended
June 30, 2009, primarily due to the imposition of a higher
premium tax rate in Ohio effective October 1, 2009.
Depreciation
and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense specifically identified as
such in the consolidated statements of income increased
$1.6 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010
compared with the three months ended June 30, 2009,
primarily due to depreciation of investments in infrastructure
and the amortization of certain purchased intangibles associated
with the acquisition of Molina Medicaid Solutions. Beginning in
the three months ended June 30, 2010, the amortization of a
portion of the purchased intangibles associated with the
acquisition of Molina Medicaid Solutions is recorded as
contra-service revenue, rather than as part of depreciation and
amortization expense. Additionally, most of the depreciation
expense associated with Molina Medicaid Solutions is recorded as
cost of service revenue. The following table presents all
depreciation and amortization expense recorded in the
consolidated financial statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
11,219
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
9,584
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
Amortization expense recorded as contra-service revenue
|
|
|
1,591
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense recorded as cost of service revenue
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization reported in the consolidated
statements of cash flows
|
|
$
|
13,851
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
9,584
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
Expense
Interest expense increased to $4.1 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2010, compared with $3.2 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2009. We incurred
higher interest expense relating to the $105 million draw
on our credit facility (beginning May 1, 2010) to fund
the acquisition. Interest expense includes non-cash interest
expense relating to our convertible senior notes, which totaled
$1.3 million, and $1.2 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
39
Income
Taxes
Income tax expense was recorded at an effective rate of 38.1%
for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared with
10.5% in three months ended June 30, 2009. The lower rate
in 2009 was primarily due to discrete tax benefits of
$4.4 million recorded in the second quarter of 2009 as a
result of settling tax examinations and the voluntary filing of
certain accounting method changes.
Effective January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2009,
our income tax expense included both the Michigan business
income tax, or BIT, and the Michigan modified gross receipts
tax, or MGRT. Effective January 1, 2010, we have recorded
the MGRT as a premium tax and not as an income tax. We will
continue to record the BIT as an income tax.
Generally, the MGRT is a 0.976% tax (statutory rate of 0.8% plus
21.99% surtax) on modified gross receipts, which for most
taxpayers are defined as receipts less purchases from other
firms. Managed care organizations, however, are not currently
allowed to deduct payments to providers in determining modified
gross receipts. As a result, the MGRT is 0.976% of the Michigan
plans receipts, and does not vary with levels of pretax
income or margins. We believe that presentation of the MGRT as a
premium tax produces financial statements that are more useful
to the reader.
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, amounts for
premium tax expense (included in general and administrative
expenses) and income tax expense have been reclassified to
conform to the presentation of MGRT as a premium tax. The MGRT
amounted to $1.5 million and $1.2 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2010, and 2009, respectively.
There was no impact to net income for either period presented
relating to this change.
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared with the Six Months
Ended June 30, 2009
Summary
of Consolidated Operating Results
Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2010,
compared with the six months ended June 30, 2009, were most
significantly impacted by the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Increased premium revenue due to higher enrollment, partially
offset by lower revenue PMPM. Medicare enrollment exceeded
20,000 members at June 30, 2010, and Medicare premium
revenue was $117.9 million and $62.2 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2010, and 2009, respectively.
|
|
|
|
Lower PMPM medical costs due to lower incidence of the
influenza-related illnesses in 2010, improved hospital
utilization, the transfer of pharmacy costs back to the states
of Ohio and Missouri, and the implementation of various
contracting and medical management initiatives.
|
|
|
|
Higher administrative and premium tax expenses for the Health
Plan segment, driven in part by the cost of our Medicare
expansion and the acquisition of Molina Medicaid Solutions.
|
|
|
|
A $1.5 million gain on the purchase of our convertible
senior notes recognized in the first quarter of 2009, with no
comparable event in the first quarter of 2010.
|
|
|
|
The acquisition of Molina Medicaid Solutions effective
May 1, 2010. The Molina Medicaid Solutions segment
contributed $5.0 million to operating income for the six
months ended June 30, 2010.
|
Health
Plans Segment
Summary
of Health Plans Segment Operating Results
Operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2010
decreased $6.0 million compared with the six months ended
June 30, 2009. Improved medical margins during the six
ended June 30, 2010 were more than offset by:
|
|
|
|
|
$8.7 million in premium reductions retroactive to
October 1, 2009 that were imposed by the state of Michigan;
|
|
|
|
$1.7 million in acquisition costs related to the purchase
of Molina Medicaid Solutions;
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
$12.2 million in additional premium tax; and
|
|
|
|
$23.3 million of additional administrative expense.
|
Premium
Revenue
Premium revenue grew 8.9% in the six months ended June 30,
2010 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2009, due
to a membership increase of nearly 10%. Premium revenue was
reduced $8.7 million during the six months ended
June 30, 2010 due to rate reductions in Michigan that were
retroactive to October 1, 2009. The related reduction to
medical expense was only $0.5 million. On a PMPM basis
consolidated premium revenue decreased 2.7% because of declines
in premium rates at several of our health plans. The most
significant declines in premium rates were in Ohio and Missouri,
due to the transfer of pharmacy risk back to the state, and in
Washington. Washington premiums PMPM were lower during the six
months ended June 30, 2010 compared with the six months
ended June 30, 2009, as result of reductions made to both
Medicaid premiums and fee schedules during the third quarter of
2009.
Medical
Care Costs
The following table provides the details of our consolidated
medical care costs for the periods indicated (dollars in
thousands except PMPM amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
PMPM
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
PMPM
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fee for service
|
|
$
|
1,161,839
|
|
|
$
|
130.52
|
|
|
|
69.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,006,207
|
|
|
$
|
126.49
|
|
|
|
65.3
|
%
|
Capitation
|
|
|
273,896
|
|
|
|
30.77
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
272,800
|
|
|
|
34.29
|
|
|
|
17.7
|
|
Pharmacy
|
|
|
165,241
|
|
|
|
18.56
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
201,894
|
|
|
|
25.38
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
61,453
|
|
|
|
6.90
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
60,193
|
|
|
|
7.57
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,662,429
|
|
|
$
|
186.75
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,541,094
|
|
|
$
|
193.73
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical care costs, in the aggregate, decreased 3.6% on a PMPM
basis for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared with
the six months ended June 30, 2009, primarily due to the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
The transfer of pharmacy risk back to the states of Ohio and
Missouri,
|
|
|
|
A less severe flu season in 2010,
|
|
|
|
Reductions in Medicaid fee schedules subsequent to June 30,
2009, and
|
|
|
|
The implementation of various contracting and medical management
initiatives.
|
Excluding pharmacy costs, medical care costs were flat on a PMPM
basis for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared with
the six months ended June 30, 2009. Medical care costs as a
percentage of premium revenue were 85.6% for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 compared with 86.4% for the six months
ended June 30, 2009.
Physician and outpatient costs increased 2.6% on a PMPM basis
for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared with the
six months ended June 30, 2009. Although we continued to
observe hospitals billing for more intensive levels of care for
the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared with the six
months ended June 30, 2009, emergency room costs PMPM were
stable as both utilization and cost per visit remained
essentially unchanged. We attribute stable emergency room costs
to, among other things, a less severe flu season when compared
to 2009; changes in provider contracts and fee schedules; and
our efforts to reduce inappropriate utilization.
Inpatient facility costs increased 2.5% on a PMPM basis for the
six months ended June 30, 2010, compared with the six
months ended June 30, 2009. Both utilization and unit costs
increased slightly compared with the six months ended
June 30, 2009.
Pharmacy costs (including the benefit of rebates) decreased
26.9% on a PMPM basis for the six months ended June 30,
2010, including our Missouri and Ohio health plans. The pharmacy
benefit was transferred to the state of
41
Missouri effective October 1, 2009, and was transferred to
the state of Ohio effective February 1, 2010. Excluding
these health plans, pharmacy costs increased 3.7% on a PMPM
basis compared with the six months ended June 30, 2009 as a
result of flat utilization and a moderate increase in unit costs.
Capitated costs decreased 10.3% on a PMPM basis compared with
six months ended June 30, 2009 as a result of the
recognition, in the second quarter of 2009, of $22 million
in retroactive capitation expense at the New Mexico health plan
that related to 2009 and 2008. The retroactive capitation
expense at the New Mexico health plan was directly related to
the receipt of $25.3 million in retroactive premium revenue
in the second quarter of 2009. There was no corresponding
retroactive adjustment in the second quarter of 2010.
Health
Plans Segment Operating Data
The following summarizes member months, premium revenue, medical
care costs, medical care ratio, and premium taxes by health plan
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30,
2009 (dollars in thousands except PMPM amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Premium Revenue
|
|
|
Medical Care Costs
|
|
|
Medical
|
|
|
Premium Tax
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
PMPM
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
PMPM
|
|
|
Care Ratio
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
California
|
|
|
2,112,000
|
|
|
$
|
248,461
|
|
|
$
|
117.62
|
|
|
$
|
213,567
|
|
|
$
|
101.10
|
|
|
|
86.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,265
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
314,000
|
|
|
|
80,550
|
|
|
|
256.94
|
|
|
|
73,821
|
|
|
|
235.47
|
|
|
|
91.7
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
1,354,000
|
|
|
|
312,114
|
|
|
|
230.45
|
|
|
|
261,212
|
|
|
|
192.87
|
|
|
|
83.7
|
|
|
|
19,650
|
|
Missouri
|
|
|
468,000
|
|
|
|
103,922
|
|
|
|
221.93
|
|
|
|
89,836
|
|
|
|
191.85
|
|
|
|
86.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Mexico
|
|
|
560,000
|
|
|
|
187,547
|
|
|
|
334.75
|
|
|
|
147,225
|
|
|
|
262.78
|
|
|
|
78.5
|
|
|
|
4,991
|
|
Ohio
|
|
|
1,368,000
|
|
|
|
431,032
|
|
|
|
315.20
|
|
|
|
346,900
|
|
|
|
253.68
|
|
|
|
80.5
|
|
|
|
33,517
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
246,000
|
|
|
|
82,693
|
|
|
|
336.46
|
|
|
|
71,464
|
|
|
|
290.77
|
|
|
|
86.4
|
|
|
|
1,386
|
|
Utah
|
|
|
451,000
|
|
|
|
123,474
|
|
|
|
273.66
|
|
|
|
122,435
|
|
|
|
271.36
|
|
|
|
99.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington
|
|
|
2,029,000
|
|
|
|
367,258
|
|
|
|
181.05
|
|
|
|
318,302
|
|
|
|
156.91
|
|
|
|
86.7
|
|
|
|
6,656
|
|
Other(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
8,902,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,941,905
|
|
|
$
|
218.15
|
|
|
$
|
1,662,429
|
|
|
$
|
186.75
|
|
|
|
85.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
69,541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Premium Revenue
|
|
|
Medical Care Costs
|
|
|
Medical
|
|
|
Premium Tax
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
PMPM
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
PMPM
|
|
|
Care Ratio
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
California
|
|
|
2,011,000
|
|
|
$
|
231,953
|
|
|
$
|
115.34
|
|
|
$
|
215,723
|
|
|
$
|
107.27
|
|
|
|
93.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,711
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
136,000
|
|
|
|
39,030
|
|
|
|
287.03
|
|
|
|
35,123
|
|
|
|
258.29
|
|
|
|
90.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
1,243,000
|
|
|
|
269,314
|
|
|
|
216.71
|
|
|
|
222,397
|
|
|
|
178.96
|
|
|
|
82.6
|
|
|
|
17,376
|
|
Missouri
|
|
|
463,000
|
|
|
|
116,848
|
|
|
|
252.53
|
|
|
|
95,556
|
|
|
|
206.51
|
|
|
|
81.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Mexico
|
|
|
499,000
|
|
|
|
196,226
|
|
|
|
393.53
|
|
|
|
172,276
|
|
|
|
345.50
|
|
|
|
87.8
|
|
|
|
5,082
|
|
Ohio
|
|
|
1,156,000
|
|
|
|
382,107
|
|
|
|
330.46
|
|
|
|
326,419
|
|
|
|
282.30
|
|
|
|
85.4
|
|
|
|
20,923
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
190,000
|
|
|
|
67,356
|
|
|
|
354.66
|
|
|
|
52,257
|
|
|
|
275.15
|
|
|
|
77.6
|
|
|
|
1,256
|
|
Utah
|
|
|
384,000
|
|
|
|
108,536
|
|
|
|
282.34
|
|
|
|
97,445
|
|
|
|
253.49
|
|
|
|
89.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington
|
|
|
1,871,000
|
|
|
|
364,424
|
|
|
|
194.78
|
|
|
|
306,526
|
|
|
|
163.83
|
|
|
|
84.1
|
|
|
|
6,011
|
|
Other(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
7,953,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,782,991
|
|
|
$
|
224.14
|
|
|
$
|
1,541,094
|
|
|
$
|
193.73
|
|
|
|
86.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
57,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Other medical care costs represent primarily
medically related administrative costs at the parent company. |
42
Molina
Medicaid Solutions Segment
Performance of the Molina Medicaid Solutions segment for the two
months ended June 30, 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Service revenue
|
|
$
|
22,645
|
|
Amortization of purchased intangibles recorded as contra-service
revenue
|
|
|
(1,591
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net service revenue
|
|
|
21,054
|
|
Cost of service revenue
|
|
|
14,254
|
|
General and administrative costs
|
|
|
966
|
|
Amortization of purchased intangibles recorded as amortization
expense
|
|
|
829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
5,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Expenses and Other
General
and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses were $157.0 million, or
8.0% of total revenue, for the six months ended June 30,
2010, compared with $130.4 million, or 7.3% of total
revenue, for the for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
The increase in the G&A ratio was primarily due to higher
administrative expenses for the Health Plans segment, which
includes all corporate related administrative costs. Costs of
the continuing build out of the Medicare administrative
structure added $5.7 million to administrative costs when
compared with the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Acquisition expenses associated with the acquisition of Molina
Medicaid Solutions were $2.3 million during the six months
ended June 30, 2010. Network and product expansions other
than the Medicare line of business added $2.3 million to
administrative expense during the six months ended June 30,
2010. Higher regulatory fees added $1.3 million to
administrative expense during the six months ended June 30,
2010. All other Health Plans segment administrative costs
increased by $14.0 million during the six months ended
June 30, 2010. The cost of services shared between the
Health Plans and Molina Medicaid Solutions segments is charged
to the Health Plans segment. A portion of the $14.0 million
increase in other administrative costs recorded at the Health
Plans segment supported the integration of Molina Medicaid
Solutions into our consolidated operations. Stand alone
administrative expenses of the Molina Medicaid Solutions segment
were approximately $1.0 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Medicare-related administrative costs
|
|
$
|
14,521
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
8,847
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Non Medicare-related administrative costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Molina Medicaid Solutions segment administrative costs
|
|
|
966
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Molina Medicaid Solutions acquisition costs
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Plans segment administrative payroll, including employee
incentive compensation
|
|
|
109,885
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
98,316
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
All other Health Plans segment administrative expense
|
|
|
29,337
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
23,255
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G&A expenses
|
|
$
|
156,959
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
130,418
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
Premium
Tax Expense
Premium tax expense relating to health plan premium revenue
increased to 3.6% of revenue for the six months ended
June 30, 2010, from 3.2% for the six months ended
June 30, 2009, primarily due to the imposition of a higher
premium tax rate in Ohio effective October 1, 2009.
Depreciation
and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense specifically identified as
such in the consolidated statements of income increased
$2.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010
compared with the six months ended June 30, 2009, primarily
due to depreciation of investments in infrastructure and the
amortization of certain purchased intangibles associated with
the acquisition of Molina Medicaid Solutions. Beginning in the
second quarter of 2010, a portion of amortization expense has
been recorded as contra-service revenue, rather than as part of
depreciation and amortization expense. Additionally, most of the
depreciation expense associated with the Molina Medicaid
Solutions segment is recorded as cost of service revenue. The
following table presents all depreciation and amortization
expense recorded in the consolidated financial statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
21,280
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
18,636
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
Amortization expense recorded as contra- service revenue
|
|
|
1,591
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense recorded as cost of service revenue
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization reported in the consolidated
statements of cash flows
|
|
$
|
23,912
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
18,636
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain
on Retirement of Convertible Senior Notes
In February 2009, we purchased and retired $13.0 million
face amount of our convertible senior notes. We purchased the
notes at an average price of $74.25 per $100 principal amount,
for a total of $9.7 million. Including accrued interest,
our total payment was $9.8 million. In connection with the
purchase of the Notes, we recorded a gain of $1.5 million
($0.04 per diluted share) in the first quarter of 2009.
Interest
Expense
Interest expense increased to $7.5 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2010, from $6.6 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2009. We incurred higher
interest expense relating to the $105 million draw on our
credit facility (beginning May 1, 2010) to fund the
acquisition. Interest expense includes non-cash interest expense
relating to our convertible senior notes, which totaled
$2.5 million, and $2.4 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Income
Taxes
Income tax expense was recorded at an effective rate of 38.0%
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared with 25.6%
for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The lower rate in
2009 was primarily due to discrete tax benefits of
$4.4 million recorded in the second quarter of 2009 as a
result of settling tax examinations and the voluntary filing of
certain accounting method changes.
Effective January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2009,
our income tax expense included both the Michigan business
income tax, or BIT, and the Michigan modified gross receipts
tax, or MGRT. Effective January 1, 2010, we have recorded
the MGRT as a premium tax and not as an income tax. We will
continue to record the BIT as an income tax.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, amounts for premium
tax expense and income tax expense have been reclassified to
conform to the presentation of MGRT as a premium tax. The MGRT
amounted to $3.1 million and
44
$2.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010,
and 2009, respectively. There was no impact to net income for
either period presented relating to this change.
Acquisitions
In addition to the acquisition of Molina Medicaid Solutions,
described in Overview above, on July 12, 2010,
we announced a definitive agreement to acquire Abri Health Plan,
a provider of Medicaid managed care services to BadgerCare Plus
and SSI Managed Care enrollees in Wisconsin. Abri Health Plan
currently serves Medicaid beneficiaries in 23 counties in
Wisconsin. In April 2010, Abri received a notice of intent to
award a new contract to provide Medicaid managed care services
to BadgerCare Plus enrollees in Wisconsins southeast
region (Kenosha, Milwaukee, Ozaukee, Racine, Washington, and
Waukesha counties), to be implemented between September 1 and
November 1, 2010.
The purchase price for the acquisition is expected to be
approximately $16 million, subject to adjustments, and will
be funded with available cash
and/or the
Credit Facility. Subject to regulatory approvals and the
satisfaction of other closing conditions, the closing of the
transaction is expected to occur by August 31, 2010.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
We manage our cash, investments, and capital structure to meet
the short- and long-term obligations of our business while
maintaining liquidity and financial flexibility. We forecast,
analyze, and monitor our cash flows to enable prudent investment
management and financing within the confines of our financial
strategy.
Our regulated subsidiaries generate significant cash flows from
premium revenue and investment income. Such cash flows are our
primary source of liquidity. Thus, any future decline in our
profitability may have a negative impact on our liquidity. We
generally receive premium revenue in advance of the payment of
claims for the related health care services. A majority of the
assets held by our regulated subsidiaries are in the form of
cash, cash equivalents, and investments. After considering
expected cash flows from operating activities, we generally
invest cash of regulated subsidiaries that exceeds our expected
short-term obligations in longer term, investment-grade,
marketable debt securities to improve our overall investment
return. These investments are made pursuant to board approved
investment policies which conform to applicable state laws and
regulations. Our investment policies are designed to provide
liquidity, preserve capital, and maximize total return on
invested assets, all in a manner consistent with state
requirements that prescribe the types of instruments in which
our subsidiaries may invest. These investment policies require
that our investments have final maturities of five years or less
(excluding auction rate securities and variable rate securities,
for which interest rates are periodically reset) and that the
average maturity be two years or less. Professional portfolio
managers operating under documented guidelines manage our
investments. As of June 30, 2010, a substantial portion of
our cash was invested in a portfolio of highly liquid money
market securities, and our investments consisted solely of
investment-grade debt securities. All of our investments are
classified as current assets, except for our investments in
auction rate securities, which are classified as non-current
assets. Our restricted investments are invested principally in
certificates of deposit and U.S. treasury securities.
Investment income decreased to $3.1 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 compared with $5.6 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2009. This decline was
primarily due to lower interest rates in 2010. Our annualized
portfolio yield for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was
0.8% compared with 1.6% for the six months ended June 30,
2009.
Investments and restricted investments are subject to interest
rate risk and will decrease in value if market rates increase.
We have the ability to hold our restricted investments until
maturity and, as a result, we would not expect the value of
these investments to decline significantly due to a sudden
change in market interest rates. Declines in interest rates over
time will reduce our investment income.
Cash in excess of the capital needs of our regulated health
plans is generally paid to our non-regulated parent company in
the form of dividends, when and as permitted by applicable
regulations, for general corporate use.
Cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended
June 30, 2010, was $25.3 million, compared with
$94.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009,
a decrease of $69.5 million. This decrease was primarily
45
due to the timing of the Ohio health plans receipt of
premium payments from the state of Ohio. In 2009, the state of
Ohio typically paid premiums in advance of the month the premium
was earned. Beginning in January 2010, the state of Ohio has
delayed its premium payments to mid-month for the month premium
is earned. The Company does not anticipate any advance payments
for the Ohio plans premiums during 2010.
Cash used in investing activities was $137.3 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared with
$27.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009,
due chiefly to the acquisition of Molina Medicaid Solutions,
which totaled $131 million.
Cash provided by financing activities was $138.9 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared with
$36.3 million used in financing activities for the six
months ended June 30, 2009. In the second quarter of 2010
we borrowed $105 million on our credit facility to fund the
acquisition of Molina Medicaid Solutions (see Capital
Resources, below). The primary use of cash in the six
months ended June 30, 2009 was under our securities
purchase programs, where we purchased $27.7 million of our
common stock, and $9.7 million of our convertible senior
notes.
EBITDA
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
21,178
|
|
|
$
|
19,488
|
|
|
$
|
41,616
|
|
|
$
|
42,649
|
|
Add back:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
11,219
|
|
|
|
9,584
|
|
|
|
21,280
|
|
|
|
18,636
|
|
Amortization expense recorded as contra-service revenue
|
|
|
1,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense recorded as cost of service revenue
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
35,029
|
|
|
$
|
29,072
|
|
|
$
|
65,528
|
|
|
$
|
61,285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We calculate EBITDA by adding back depreciation and amortization
expense to operating income, including $1.6 million
amortization expense recorded as contra-service revenue, and
$1.0 million depreciation expense recorded as cost of
service revenue for both the three months and six months ended
June 30, 2010, respectively. Operating income included
interest income of $2.5 million and $5.0 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2010, and 2009, respectively.
EBITDA is not prepared in conformity with GAAP because it
excludes depreciation and amortization expense, as well as
interest expense, and the provision for income taxes. This
non-GAAP financial measure should not be considered as an
alternative to net income, operating income, operating margin,
or cash provided by operating activities. Management uses EBITDA
as a supplemental metric in evaluating our financial
performance, in evaluating financing and business development
decisions, and in forecasting and analyzing future periods. For
these reasons, management believes that EBITDA is a useful
supplemental measure to investors in evaluating our performance
and the performance of other companies in our industry. |
Capital
Resources
At June 30, 2010, the parent company Molina
Healthcare, Inc. held cash and investments of
approximately $47.4 million, including auction rate
securities with a fair value of $7.6 million, compared with
$45.6 million of cash and investments at December 31,
2009. On a consolidated basis, at June 30, 2010, we had
working capital of $345.4 million compared with
$321.2 million at December 31, 2009. At June 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, cash and cash equivalents were
$461.0 million and $469.5 million, respectively. At
June 30, 2010, investments were $212.0 million,
including $36.7 million in non-current auction rate
securities, and at December 31, 2009, investments were
$234.5 million, including $59.7 million in non-current
auction rate securities.
46
In connection with the May 1, 2010 closing of our
acquisition of Molina Medicaid Solutions, we used a draw on our
credit facility, which previously had had no outstanding
balance, to fund $105 million of the $131 million
purchase price. The $26 million balance of the purchase
price was funded with available cash.
We believe that our cash resources and internally generated
funds will be sufficient to support our operations, regulatory
requirements, and capital expenditures for at least the next
12 months.
Credit
Facility
In 2005, we entered into an Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement, dated as of March 9, 2005, among Molina
Healthcare Inc., certain lenders, and Bank of America N.A., as
Administrative Agent (the Credit Facility).
Effective May 2008, we entered into a third amendment of the
Credit Facility that increased the size of the revolving line of
credit from $180.0 million to $200.0 million, maturing
in May 2012. The Credit Facility is intended to be used for
general corporate purposes.
Our obligations under the Credit Facility are secured by a lien
on substantially all of our assets and by a pledge of the
capital stock of our health plan subsidiaries (with the
exception of the California health plan). The Credit Facility
includes usual and customary covenants for credit facilities of
this type, including covenants limiting liens, mergers, asset
sales, other fundamental changes, debt, acquisitions, dividends
and other distributions, capital expenditures, investments, and
a fixed charge coverage ratio. The Credit Facility also requires
us to maintain a ratio of total consolidated debt to total
consolidated EBITDA of not more than 2.75 to 1.00 at any time.
At June 30, 2010, we were in compliance with all financial
covenants in the Credit Facility.
Subject to the closing of the Molina Medicaid Solutions
acquisition, in November 2009 we agreed to enter into a fourth
amendment to the Credit Facility. The fourth amendment became
effective upon the closing of the acquisition of Molina Medicaid
Solutions. The fourth amendment was required because the
$131 million purchase price for this acquisition exceeded
the applicable deal size threshold under the terms of the Credit
Facility. Pursuant to the fourth amendment, the lenders
consented to our acquisition of Molina Medicaid Solutions.
Upon its effectiveness at the closing, the fourth amendment
increased the commitment fee on the total unused commitments of
the lenders under the facility to 50 basis points on all
levels of the pricing grid, with the pricing grid referring to
our ratio of consolidated funded debt to consolidated EBITDA.
The pricing for LIBOR loans and base rate loans was raised by
200 basis points at every level of the pricing grid. Thus,
the applicable margins now range between 2.75% and 3.75% for
LIBOR loans, and between 1.75% and 2.75% for base rate loans.
Until the delivery of a compliance certificate with respect to
our financial statements for the second quarter of 2010, the
applicable margin shall be fixed at 3.5% for LIBOR loans and
2.5% for base rate loans. In connection with the lenders
approval of the fourth amendment, a consent fee of 10 basis
points was paid on the amount of each consenting lenders
commitment. In addition, the fourth amendment carved out from
our indebtedness and restricted payment covenants under the
Credit Facility the $187.0 million current principal amount
of the convertible senior notes (although the
$187.0 million indebtedness is still included in the
calculation of our consolidated leverage ratio); increased the
amount of surety bond obligations we may incur; increased our
allowable capital expenditures; and reduced the fixed charge
coverage ratio from 3.50x to 2.75x (on a pro forma basis) at
December 31, 2009, and 3.00x thereafter.
On March 15, 2010, we agreed to enter into a fifth
amendment to the Credit Facility. The fifth amendment also
became effective upon the closing of the acquisition of Molina
Medicaid Solutions. The fifth amendment was required because,
after giving effect to the acquisition of Molina Medicaid
Solutions on a pro forma basis, and inclusive of our fourth
quarter 2009 EBITDA of only $5.9 million, our consolidated
leverage ratio for the preceding four fiscal quarters exceeded
the currently applicable ratio of 2.75 to 1.0. The fifth
amendment increased the maximum consolidated leverage ratio
under the Credit Facility to 3.25 to 1.0 for the fourth quarter
of 2009 (on a pro forma basis), and to 3.50 to 1.0 for the
first, second, and third quarters of 2010, excluding the single
date of September 30, 2010. On September 30, 2010, the
maximum consolidated leverage ratio shall revert back to 2.75 to
1.0. However, if we have actually reduced our consolidated
leverage ratio to no more than 2.75 to 1.0 on or before
August 15, 2010, the consolidated leverage ratio under the
Credit Facility will revert back to 2.75 to 1.0 on
August 15, 2010. On the date that the consolidated leverage
ratio reverts to 2.75 to 1.0 whether August 15,
2010 or September 30, 2010 the aggregate
commitments of the lenders under the Credit Facility shall be
reduced on a
47
pro rata basis from $200 million to $150 million. In
connection with the lenders approval of the fifth
amendment, we paid an amendment fee of 25 basis points on
the amount of each consenting lenders commitment. We will
also pay an incremental commitment fee of 12.5 basis points
based on each lenders unfunded commitment during the
period from the effective date of the fifth amendment through
the date that the maximum consolidated leverage ratio is reduced
to 2.75 to 1.0, plus a potential duration fee of 50 basis
points payable on August 15, 2010 in the event that the
consolidated leverage ratio has not been reduced to 2.75 to 1.0
by August 15, 2010. At June 30, 2010, our consolidated
leverage ratio was 2.9%, as computed per the terms of the Credit
Facility.
Shelf
Registration Statement
In December 2008, we filed a shelf registration statement on
Form S-3
with the Securities and Exchange Commission covering the
issuance of up to $300 million of our securities, including
common stock, warrants, or debt securities, and up to
250,000 shares of outstanding common stock that may be sold
from time to time by the Molina Siblings Trust as a selling
stockholder. We may publicly offer securities from time to time
at prices and terms to be determined at the time of the offering.
On August 4, 2010, we issued a press release announcing a
proposed offering of 4,000,000 shares of common stock
covered by this registration statement. We intend to use the
proceeds from this offering to repay the Credit Facility and for
general corporate purposes.
Long-Term
Debt
Convertible
Senior Notes
In October 2007, we sold $200.0 million aggregate principal
amount of 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2014 (the
Notes). The sale of the Notes resulted in net
proceeds totaling $193.4 million. During 2009, we purchased
and retired $13.0 million face amount of the Notes, for a
remaining aggregate principal amount of $187.0 million as
of December 31, 2009. The Notes rank equally in right of
payment with our existing and future senior indebtedness.
The Notes are convertible into cash and, under certain
circumstances, shares of our common stock. The initial
conversion rate is 21.3067 shares of our common stock per
$1,000 principal amount of the Notes. This represents an initial
conversion price of approximately $46.93 per share of our common
stock. In addition, if certain corporate transactions that
constitute a change of control occur prior to maturity, we will
increase the conversion rate in certain circumstances. Prior to
July 2014, holders may convert their Notes only under the
following circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
During any fiscal quarter after our fiscal quarter ending
December 31, 2007, if the closing sale price per share of
our common stock, for each of at least 20 trading days during
the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last
trading day of the previous fiscal quarter, is greater than or
equal to 120% of the conversion price per share of our common
stock;
|
|
|
|
During the five business day period immediately following any
five consecutive trading day period in which the trading price
per $1,000 principal amount of the Notes for each trading day of
such period was less than 98% of the product of the closing
price per share of our common stock on such day and the
conversion rate in effect on such day; or
|
|
|
|
Upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions or other
specified events.
|
On or after July 1, 2014, holders may convert their Notes
at any time prior to the close of business on the scheduled
trading day immediately preceding the stated maturity date
regardless of whether any of the foregoing conditions is
satisfied.
We will deliver cash and shares of our common stock, if any,
upon conversion of each $1,000 principal amount of Notes, as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
An amount in cash (the principal return) equal to
the sum of, for each of the 20 Volume-Weighted Average Price, or
VWAP, trading days during the conversion period, the lesser of
the daily conversion value for such VWAP trading day and $50
(representing 1/20th of $1,000); and
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
A number of shares based upon, for each of the 20 VWAP trading
days during the conversion period, any excess of the daily
conversion value above $50.
|
Regulatory
Capital and Dividend Restrictions
Our principal operations are conducted through our health plan
subsidiaries operating in California, Florida, Michigan,
Missouri, New Mexico, Ohio, Texas, Utah, and Washington. The
health plans are subject to state laws that, among other things,
require the maintenance of minimum levels of statutory capital,
as defined by each state, and may restrict the timing, payment,
and amount of dividends and other distributions that may be paid
to Molina Healthcare, Inc. as the sole stockholder of each of
our health plans. To the extent the subsidiaries must comply
with these regulations, they may not have the financial
flexibility to transfer funds to us. The net assets in these
subsidiaries, after intercompany eliminations, which may not be
transferable to us in the form of loans, advances, or cash
dividends totaled $362.3 million at June 30, 2010, and
$368.7 million at December 31, 2009.
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners, or NAIC,
adopted rules effective December 31, 1998, which, if
adopted by a particular state, set minimum capitalization
requirements for health plans and other insurance entities
bearing risk for health care coverage. The requirements take the
form of risk-based capital, or RBC, rules. These rules, which
vary slightly from state to state, have been adopted in
Michigan, Missouri, New Mexico, Ohio, Texas, Utah, and
Washington. California and Florida have not adopted RBC rules
and have not given notice of any intention to do so. The RBC
rules, if adopted by California and Florida, may increase the
minimum capital required by those states.
At June 30, 2010, our health plans had aggregate statutory
capital and surplus of approximately $376.2 million,
compared with the required minimum aggregate statutory capital
and surplus of approximately $253.2 million. All of our
health plans were in compliance with the minimum capital
requirements at June 30, 2010. We have the ability and
commitment to provide additional working capital to each of our
health plans when necessary to ensure that capital and surplus
continue to meet regulatory requirements. Barring any change in
regulatory requirements, we believe that we will continue to be
in compliance with these requirements through 2010.
Contractual
Obligations
In our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, we reported on our
contractual obligations as of that date. There have been no
material changes to our contractual obligations since that
report.
Critical
Accounting Policies
When we prepare our consolidated financial statements, we use
estimates and assumptions that may affect reported amounts and
disclosures. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Principal areas requiring the use of estimates include those
areas listed below. The most significant of these estimates is
revenue recognition, the determination of deferred contract
costs, and the determination of medical claims and benefits
payable, which are discussed in further detail below:
|
|
|
|
|
The recognition of revenue;
|
|
|
|
The determination of deferred contract costs;
|
|
|
|
The determination of medical claims and benefits payable;
|
|
|
|
The determination of the amount of revenue to be recognized
under certain contracts that place revenue at risk dependent
upon either the achievement of certain quality or administrative
measurements, or the expenditure of certain percentages of
revenue on defined expenses;
|
|
|
|
The determination of allowances for uncollectible accounts;
|
|
|
|
The valuation of certain investments;
|
|
|
|
Settlements under risk or savings sharing programs;
|
|
|
|
The impairment of long-lived and intangible assets;
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
The determination of professional and general liability claims,
and reserves for potential absorption of claims unpaid by
insolvent providers;
|
|
|
|
The determination of reserves for the outcome of litigation;
|
|
|
|
The determination of valuation allowances for deferred tax
assets; and
|
|
|
|
The determination of unrecognized tax benefits.
|
Revenue
Recognition Health Plans Segment
Certain components of premium revenue are subject to accounting
estimates. Chief among these are:
|
|
|
|
|
Florida Health Plan Medical Cost Floor (Minimum) for
Behavioral Health. A portion of premium revenue
paid to our Florida health plan by the state of Florida may be
refunded to the state if certain minimum amounts are not spent
on defined behavioral health care costs. At June 30, 2010,
we had not recorded any liability under the terms of this
contract provision. If the state of Florida disagrees with our
interpretation of the existing contract terms, an adjustment to
the amounts owed may be required. Any changes to the terms of
this provision, including revisions to the definitions of
premium revenue or behavioral health care costs, the period of
time over which performance is measured or the manner of its
measurement, or the percentages used in the calculations, may
affect the profitability of our Florida health plan.
|
|
|
|
New Mexico Health Plan Medical Cost Floors (Minimums) and
Administrative Cost and Profit Ceilings
(Maximums): A portion of premium revenue paid to
our New Mexico health plan by the state of New Mexico may be
refunded to the state if certain minimum amounts are not spent
on defined medical care costs, or if administrative costs or
profit (as defined) exceed certain amounts. Our contract with
the state of New Mexico requires that we spend a minimum
percentage of premium revenue on certain explicitly defined
medical care costs (the medical cost floor). Our contract is for
a three-year period, and the medical cost floor is based on
premiums and medical care costs over the entire contract period.
Effective July 1, 2008, our New Mexico health plan entered
into a new three year contract that, in addition to retaining
the medical cost floor, added certain limits on the amount our
New Mexico health plan can: (a) expend on administrative
costs; and (b) retain as profit. At June 30, 2010, we
had recorded a liability of approximately $2.8 million
under the terms of these contract provisions. If the state of
New Mexico disagrees with our interpretation of the existing
contract terms, an adjustment to the amounts owed may be
required. Any changes to the terms of these provisions,
including revisions to the definitions of premium revenue,
medical care costs, administrative costs or profit, the period
of time over which performance is measured or the manner of its
measurement, or the percentages used in the calculations, may
affect the profitability of our New Mexico health plan.
|
|
|
|
New Mexico Health Plan At-Risk Premium
Revenue: Under our contract with the state of New
Mexico, up to 1% of our New Mexico health plans revenue
may be refundable to the state if certain performance measures
are not met. These performance measures are generally linked to
various quality of care and administrative measures dictated by
the state. For the twelve months ended through the end of the
state fiscal year on June 30, 2010, our New Mexico health
plan had received $3.7 million in at-risk revenue for state
fiscal year 2010. We have recognized $1.8 million of that
amount as revenue, and recorded a liability of approximately
$1.9 million for the remainder.
|
|
|
|
Ohio Health Plan At-Risk Premium
Revenue: Under our contract with the state of
Ohio, up to 1% of our Ohio health plans revenue may be
refundable to the state if certain performance measures are not
met. Effective January 1, 2010 an additional 0.25% of the
Ohio health plans revenue became refundable if certain
pharmacy specific performance measures were not met. These
performance measures are generally linked to various
quality-of-care
measures dictated by the state. For the twelve months ended
through the end of the state fiscal year on June 30, 2010,
our Ohio health plan had received $8.7 million in at-risk
revenue for state fiscal year 2010. We have recognized
$6.2 million of that amount as revenue and recorded a
liability of approximately $2.5 million for the remainder
at June 30, 2010.
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
Utah Health Plan Premium Revenue: Our Utah
health plan may be entitled to receive additional premium
revenue from the state of Utah as an incentive payment for
saving the state of Utah money in relation to
fee-for-service
Medicaid. In prior years, we estimated amounts we believed were
recoverable under our savings sharing agreement with the state
of Utah based on available information and our interpretation of
our contract with the state. The state may not agree with our
interpretation or our application of the contract language, and
it may also not agree with the manner in which we have processed
and analyzed our member claims and encounter records. Thus, the
ultimate amount of savings sharing revenue that we realize from
prior years may be subject to negotiation with the state. During
2007, as a result of an ongoing disagreement with the state of
Utah, we wrote off the entire receivable, totaling
$4.7 million. Our Utah health plan continues to assert its
claim to the amounts believed to be due under the savings share
agreement. When additional information is known, or resolution
is reached with the state regarding the appropriate savings
sharing payment amount for prior years, we will adjust the
amount of savings sharing revenue recorded in our financial
statements as appropriate in light of such new information or
agreement. No receivables for saving sharing revenue have been
established at June 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
Texas Health Plan Premium Revenue: The
contract entered into between our Texas health plan and the
state of Texas includes a profit-sharing agreement, where we pay
a rebate to the state of Texas if our Texas health plan
generates pretax income, as defined in the contract, above a
certain specified percentage, as determined in accordance with a
tiered rebate schedule. We are limited in the amount of
administrative costs that we may deduct in calculating the
rebate, if any. As of June 30, 2010, we had an aggregate
liability of approximately $2.1 million accrued pursuant to
our profit-sharing agreement with the state of Texas for the
2009 and 2010 contract years (ending August 31 of each year). We
made no payments to the state under the terms of this profit
sharing agreement during the first half of 2010. Because the
final settlement calculations include a claims run-out period of
nearly one year, the amounts recorded, based on our estimates,
may be adjusted. We believe that the ultimate settlement will
not differ materially from our estimates.
|
|
|
|
Texas Health Plan At-Risk Premium
Revenue: Under our contract with the state of
Texas, up to 1% of our Texas health plans revenue may be
refundable to the state if certain performance measures are not
met. These performance measures are generally linked to various
quality-of-care
measures dictated by the state. For the twelve months ended
through the end of the state fiscal year on June 30, 2010,
our Texas health plan had received $1.1 million in at-risk
revenue for state fiscal year 2010, which has all been
recognized revenue.
|
|
|
|
Medicare Premium Revenue: Based on member
encounter data that we submit to CMS, our Medicare revenue is
subject to retroactive adjustment for both member risk scores
and member pharmacy cost experience for up to two years after
the original year of service. This adjustment takes into account
the acuity of each members medical needs relative to what
was anticipated when premiums were originally set for that
member. In the event that a member requires less acute medical
care than was anticipated by the original premium amount, CMS
may recover premium from us. In the event that a member requires
more acute medical care than was anticipated by the original
premium amount, CMS may pay us additional retroactive premium. A
similar retroactive reconciliation is undertaken by CMS for our
Medicare members pharmacy utilization. That analysis is
similar to the process for the adjustment of member risk scores,
but is further complicated by member pharmacy cost sharing
provisions attached to the Medicare pharmacy benefit that do not
apply to the services measured by the member risk adjustment
process. We estimate the amount of Medicare revenue that will
ultimately be realized for the periods presented based on our
knowledge of our members heath care utilization patterns
and CMS practices. To the extent that the premium revenue
ultimately received from CMS differs from recorded amounts, we
will adjust reported Medicare revenue. Based upon our knowledge
of member health care utilization patterns we have recorded a
liability of approximately $1.5 million related to the
potential recoupment of Medicare premium revenue at
June 30, 2010.
|
Revenue
Recognition and Determination of Deferred Contract
Costs Molina Medicaid Solutions
Segment
As a result of our recent acquisition of Molina Medicaid
Solutions, a portion of our revenues is derived from service
arrangements. For fixed-price contracts where the system design
and development phase were in process as of the acquisition
date, we apply contract accounting because we will deliver
significantly modified and customized MMIS software to the
customer under the terms of the contract. Additionally, these
contracts contain multiple
51
deliverables; once the system design and development phase is
complete, we provide technology outsourcing services and
business process outsourcing. We do not have vendor specific
objective evidence of the fair value of the technology
outsourcing and business process outsourcing components of the
contracts because we do not have enough history of offering
these services on a stand-alone basis. As such we account for
these fixed-price service contracts as a single element.
In general, we recognize contract revenues as a single element
ratably over the performance period, or contract term, of the
outsourcing services (operations phase) because these services
are the last element to be delivered under the contract. The
contract terms typically range from five to 10 years. In
those service arrangements where final acceptance of a system or
solution by the customer is required, contract revenues and
costs are deferred until all material acceptance criteria have
been met and performance is substantially complete. Performance
will often extend over long periods, and our right to receive
future payment depends on our future performance in accordance
with the agreement. Revenues earned in excess of related
billings are accrued, whereas billings in excess of revenues
earned are deferred until the related services are provided.
Amortization of certain identifiable intangible assets, relating
to contract backlog, is recorded to contra-service revenue, to
match revenues associated with contract performance that
occurred prior to the acquisition date.
Deferred contract costs include direct and incremental costs
such as direct labor, hardware and software. We also defer and
subsequently amortize certain transition costs related to
activities that transition the contract from the design,
development, and implementation phase to the operational, or
business process outsourcing phase. Deferred contract costs,
including transition costs, are amortized on a straight-line
basis over the remaining original contract term, consistent with
the revenue recognition period.
The recoverability of deferred contract costs associated with a
particular contract is analyzed on a periodic basis using the
undiscounted estimated cash flows of the whole contract over its
remaining contract term. If such undiscounted cash flows are
insufficient to recover the long-lived assets and deferred
contract costs, the deferred contract costs are written down by
the amount of the cash flow deficiency. If a cash flow
deficiency remains after reducing the balance of the deferred
contract costs to zero, any remaining long-lived assets are
evaluated for impairment. Any such impairment recognized would
equal the amount by which the carrying value of the long-lived
assets exceeds the fair value of those assets. Indirect costs
associated with MMIS service contracts are generally expensed as
incurred.
Medical
Claims and Benefits Payable
The following table provides the details of our medical claims
and benefits payable as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Fee-for-service
claims incurred but not paid (IBNP)
|
|
$
|
268,652
|
|
|
$
|
246,508
|
|
|
$
|
244,987
|
|
Capitation payable
|
|
|
49,101
|
|
|
|
39,995
|
|
|
|
34,657
|
|
Pharmacy
|
|
|
13,385
|
|
|
|
20,609
|
|
|
|
22,367
|
|
Other
|
|
|
14,462
|
|
|
|
9,404
|
|
|
|
6,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
345,600
|
|
|
$
|
316,516
|
|
|
$
|
308,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The determination of our liability for claims and medical
benefits payable is particularly important to the determination
of our financial position and results of operations in any given
period. Such determination of our liability requires the
application of a significant degree of judgment by our
management.
As a result, the determination of our liability for claims and
medical benefits payable is subject to an inherent degree of
uncertainty. Our medical care costs include amounts that have
been paid by us through the reporting date, as well as estimated
liabilities for medical care costs incurred but not paid by us
as of the reporting date. Such medical care cost liabilities
include, among other items, unpaid
fee-for-service
claims, capitation payments owed providers, unpaid pharmacy
invoices, and various medically related administrative costs
that have been incurred but not paid. We use judgment to
determine the appropriate assumptions for determining the
required estimates.
52
The most important element in estimating our medical care costs
is our estimate for
fee-for-service
claims which have been incurred but not paid by us. These
fee-for-service
costs that have been incurred but have not been paid at the
reporting date are collectively referred to as medical costs
that are Incurred But Not Paid, or IBNP. Our IBNP,
as reported on our balance sheet, represents our best estimate
of the total amount of claims we will ultimately pay with
respect to claims that we have incurred as of the balance sheet
date. We estimate our IBNP monthly using actuarial methods based
on a number of factors. As indicated in the table above, our
estimated IBNP liability represented $268.7 million of our
total medical claims and benefits payable of $345.6 million
as of June 30, 2010. Excluding amounts that we anticipate
paying on behalf of a capitated provider in Ohio (which we will
subsequently withhold from that providers monthly
capitation payment), our IBNP liability at June 30, 2010
was $261.6 million.
The factors we consider when estimating our IBNP include,
without limitation, claims receipt and payment experience (and
variations in that experience), changes in membership, provider
billing practices, health care service utilization trends, cost
trends, product mix, seasonality, prior authorization of medical
services, benefit changes, known outbreaks of disease or
increased incidence of illness such as influenza, provider
contract changes, changes to Medicaid fee schedules, and the
incidence of high dollar or catastrophic claims. Our assessment
of these factors is then translated into an estimate of our IBNP
liability at the relevant measuring point through the
calculation of a base estimate of IBNP, a further reserve for
adverse claims development, and an estimate of the
administrative costs of settling all claims incurred through the
reporting date. The base estimate of IBNP is derived through
application of claims payment completion factors and trended per
member per month (PMPM) cost estimates.
For the fifth month of service prior to the reporting date and
earlier, we estimate our outstanding claims liability based on
actual claims paid, adjusted for estimated completion factors.
Completion factors seek to measure the cumulative percentage of
claims expense that will have been paid for a given month of
service as of the reporting date, based on historical payment
patterns.
The following table reflects the change in our estimate of
claims liability as of June 30, 2010 that would have
resulted had we changed our completion factors for the fifth
through the twelfth months preceding June 30, 2010, by the
percentages indicated. A reduction in the completion factor
results in an increase in medical claims liabilities. Dollar
amounts are in thousands.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in
|
|
|
Medical Claims and
|
(Decrease) Increase in Estimated Completion Factors
|
|
Benefits Payable
|
|
(6)%
|
|
$
|
77,755
|
|
(4)%
|
|
|
51,837
|
|
(2)%
|
|
|
25,918
|
|
2%
|
|
|
(25,918
|
)
|
4%
|
|
|
(51,837
|
)
|
6%
|
|
|
(77,755
|
)
|
For the four months of service immediately prior to the
reporting date, actual claims paid are not a reliable measure of
our ultimate liability, given the inherent delay between the
patient/physician encounter and the actual submission of a claim
for payment. For these months of service, we estimate our claims
liability based on trended PMPM cost estimates. These estimates
are designed to reflect recent trends in payments and expense,
utilization patterns, authorized services, and other relevant
factors. The following table reflects the change in our estimate
of claims liability as of June 30, 2010 that would have
resulted had we altered our trend factors by the percentages
53
indicated. An increase in the PMPM costs results in an increase
in medical claims liabilities. Dollar amounts are in thousands.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) Increase in
|
|
|
Medical Claims and
|
(Decrease) Increase in Trended Per member Per Month Cost
Estimates
|
|
Benefits Payable
|
|
(6)%
|
|
$
|
(65,606
|
)
|
(4)%
|
|
|
(43,738
|
)
|
(2)%
|
|
|
(21,869
|
)
|
2%
|
|
|
21,869
|
|
4%
|
|
|
43,738
|
|
6%
|
|
|
65,606
|
|
The following per-share amounts are based on a combined federal
and state statutory tax rate of 38%, and 26.0 million
diluted shares outstanding for the six months ended
June 30, 2010. Assuming a hypothetical 1% change in
completion factors from those used in our calculation of IBNP at
June 30, 2010, net income for the three months ended
June 30, 2010 would increase or decrease by approximately
$8.0 million, or $0.31 per diluted share. Assuming a
hypothetical 1% change in PMPM cost estimates from those used in
our calculation of IBNP at June 30, 2010, net income for
the three months ended June 30, 2010 would increase or
decrease by approximately $6.8 million, or $0.26 per
diluted share, net of tax. The corresponding figures for a 5%
change in completion factors and PMPM cost estimates would be
$40.2 million, or $1.55 per diluted share, and
$33.9 million, or $1.31 per diluted share, respectively.
It is important to note that any change in the estimate of
either completion factors or trended PMPM costs would usually be
accompanied by a change in the estimate of the other component,
and that a change in one component would almost always compound
rather than offset the resulting distortion to net income. When
completion factors are overestimated, trended PMPM costs
tend to be underestimated. Both circumstances will create
an overstatement of net income. Likewise, when completion
factors are underestimated, trended PMPM costs tend to be
overestimated, creating an understatement of net income.
In other words, errors in estimates involving both completion
factors and trended PMPM costs will usually act to drive
estimates of claims liabilities and medical care costs in the
same direction. If completion factors were overestimated by 1%,
resulting in an overstatement of net income by approximately
$8.0 million, it is likely that trended PMPM costs would be
underestimated, resulting in an additional overstatement of net
income.
After we have established our base IBNP reserve through the
application of completion factors and trended PMPM cost
estimates, we then compute an additional liability, once again
using actuarial techniques, to account for adverse developments
in our claims payments which the base actuarial model is not
intended to and does not account for. We refer to this
additional liability as the provision for adverse claims
development. The provision for adverse claims development is a
component of our overall determination of the adequacy of our
IBNP. It is intended to capture the potential inadequacy of our
IBNP estimate as a result of our inability to adequately assess
the impact of factors such as changes in the speed of claims
receipt and payment, the relative magnitude or severity of
claims, known outbreaks of disease such as influenza, our entry
into new geographical markets, our provision of services to new
populations such as the aged, blind or disabled (ABD), changes
to state-controlled fee schedules upon which much of our
provider payments are based, modifications and upgrades to our
claims processing systems and practices, and increasing medical
costs. Because of the complexity of our business, the number of
states in which we operate, and the need to account for
different health care benefit packages among those states, we
make an overall assessment of IBNP after considering the base
actuarial model reserves and the provision for adverse claims
development. We also include in our IBNP liability an estimate
of the administrative costs of settling all claims incurred
through the reporting date. The development of IBNP is a
continuous process that we monitor and refine on a monthly basis
as additional claims payment information becomes available. As
additional information becomes known to us, we adjust our
actuarial model accordingly to establish IBNP.
On a monthly basis, we review and update our estimated IBNP and
the methods used to determine that liability. Any adjustments,
if appropriate, are reflected in the period known. While we
believe our current estimates are adequate, we have in the past
been required to increase significantly our claims reserves for
periods previously
54
reported, and may be required to do so again in the future. Any
significant increases to prior period claims reserves would
materially decrease reported earnings for the period in which
the adjustment is made.
In our judgment, the estimates for completion factors will
likely prove to be more accurate than trended PMPM cost
estimates because estimated completion factors are subject to
fewer variables in their determination. Specifically, completion
factors are developed over long periods of time, and are most
likely to be affected by changes in claims receipt and payment
experience and by provider billing practices. Trended PMPM cost
estimates, while affected by the same factors, will also be
influenced by health care service utilization trends, cost
trends, product mix, seasonality, prior authorization of medical
services, benefit changes, outbreaks of disease or increased
incidence of illness, provider contract changes, changes to
Medicaid fee schedules, and the incidence of high dollar or
catastrophic claims. As discussed above, however, errors in
estimates involving trended PMPM costs will almost always be
accompanied by errors in estimates involving completion factors,
and vice versa. In such circumstances, errors in estimation
involving both completion factors and trended PMPM costs will
act to drive estimates of claims liabilities (and therefore
medical care costs) in the same direction.
Assuming that base reserves have been adequately set, we believe
that amounts ultimately paid out should generally be between 8%
and 10% less than the liability recorded at the end of the
period as a result of the inclusion in that liability of the
allowance for adverse claims development and the accrued cost of
settling those claims. However, there can be no assurance that
amounts ultimately paid out will not be higher or lower than
this 8% to 10% range, as shown by our results for the year ended
December 31, 2009, when the amounts ultimately paid out
were less than the amount of the reserves we had established as
of the beginning of that year by 17.6%.
As shown in greater detail in the table below, the amounts
ultimately paid out on our liabilities in fiscal years 2009 and
through June 30, 2010 were less than what we had expected
when we had established our reserves. While the specific reasons
for the overestimation of our liabilities were different in each
of the periods presented, in general the overestimations were
tied to our assessment of specific circumstances at our
individual health plans which were unique to those reporting
periods.
For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, we
recognized a benefit from prior period claims development in the
amount of $38.5 million, and $43.0 million,
respectively (see table below). This benefit was primarily
caused by the overestimation of our liability for claims and
medical benefits payable at December 31, 2009. The
overestimation of claims liability at December 31, 2009 was
the result of the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
In New Mexico, we underestimated the degree to which cuts to the
Medicaid fees schedule would reduce our liability as of
December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
In California, we underestimated the extent to which various
network restructuring, provider contracting and medical
management imitative had reduced our medical care costs during
the second half of 2009, thereby resulting in a lower liability
at December 31, 2009.
|
We recognized a benefit from prior period claims development in
the amount of $46.4 million and $51.6 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2009, and the year ended
December 31, 2009, respectively (see table below). This was
primarily caused by the overestimation of our liability for
claims and medical benefits payable at December 31, 2008.
The overestimation of claims liability at December 31, 2008
was the result of the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
In New Mexico, we overestimated at December 31, 2008 the
ultimate amounts we would need to pay to resolve certain high
dollar provider claims.
|
|
|
|
In Ohio, we underestimated the degree to which certain
operational initiatives had reduced our medical costs in the
last few months of 2008.
|
|
|
|
In Washington, we overestimated the impact that certain adverse
utilization trends would have on our liability at
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
In California, we underestimated utilization trends at the end
of 2008, leading to an underestimation of our liability at
December 31, 2008. Additionally, we underestimated the
impact that certain delays in the receipt
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
of paper claims would have on our liability, leading to a
further underestimation of our liability at December 31,
2008.
|
In estimating our claims liability at June 30, 2010, we
adjusted our base calculation to take account of the following
factors which we believe are reasonably likely to change our
final claims liability amount:
|
|
|
|
|
The rapid growth of membership in our Medicare line of business
between December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
A decrease in claims inventory at our Ohio health plan between
March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
The impact of reductions to the state Medicaid fee schedules in
New Mexico effective December 1, 2009.
|
|
|
|
The transition of claims processing for our Missouri health plan
from a third party service provider to our internal claims
processing platform effective April l, 2010.
|
|
|
|
Provider contracting changes reducing outpatient facilities
costs at our Utah health plan effective April 1, 2010.
|
The use of a consistent methodology in estimating our liability
for claims and medical benefits payable minimizes the degree to
which the under- or overestimation of that liability at the
close of one period may affect consolidated results of
operations in subsequent periods. Facts and circumstances unique
to the estimation process at any single date, however, may still
lead to a material impact on consolidated results of operations
in subsequent periods. Any absence of adverse claims development
(as well as the expensing through general and administrative
expense of the costs to settle claims held at the start of the
period) will lead to the recognition of a benefit from prior
period claims development in the period subsequent to the date
of the original estimate. However, that benefit will affect
current period earnings only to the extent that the
replenishment of the reserve for adverse claims development (and
the re-accrual of administrative costs for the settlement of
those claims) is less than the benefit recognized from the prior
period liability. In 2009 and through June 30, 2010, the
absence of adverse development of the liability for claims and
medical benefits payable at the close of the previous period
resulted in the recognition of substantial favorable prior
period development. In both years, however, the recognition of a
benefit from prior period claims development did not have a
material impact on our consolidated results of operations
because the amount of benefit recognized in each year was
roughly consistent with that recognized in the previous year.
We seek to maintain a consistent claims reserving methodology
across all periods. In 2009, the prior period benefit from an
un-utilized reserve for adverse claims development was offset by
the establishment of a new reserve in an approximately equal
amount (relative to premium revenue, medical care costs, and
medical claims and benefits payable) during the year, and thus
the impact on earnings for the current period was minimal.
The following table presents the components of the change in our
medical claims and benefits payable for the periods presented.
The negative amounts displayed for Components of
medical care costs related to: Prior years represent
the amount by which our original estimate of claims and benefits
payable at the beginning of the period
56
exceeded the actual amount of the liability based on information
(principally the payment of claims) developed since that
liability was first reported.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Balances at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
316,516
|
|
|
$
|
292,442
|
|
|
$
|
316,516
|
|
|
$
|
292,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of medical care costs related to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period
|
|
|
1,705,411
|
|
|
|
1,587,469
|
|
|
|
861,271
|
|
|
|
3,227,794
|
|
Prior periods
|
|
|
(42,982
|
)
|
|
|
(46,375
|
)
|
|
|
(38,455
|
)
|
|
|
(51,558
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total medical care costs
|
|
|
1,662,429
|
|
|
|
1,541,094
|
|
|
|
822,816
|
|
|
|
3,176,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for medical care costs related to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period
|
|
|
1,389,307
|
|
|
|
1,297,946
|
|
|
|
581,389
|
|
|
|
2,919,240
|
|
Prior periods
|
|
|
244,038
|
|
|
|
226,883
|
|
|
|
230,970
|
|
|
|
232,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid
|
|
|
1,633,345
|
|
|
|
1,524,829
|
|
|
|
812,359
|
|
|
|
3,152,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at end of period
|
|
$
|
345,600
|
|
|
$
|
308,707
|
|
|
$
|
326,973
|
|
|
$
|
316,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit from prior period as a percentage of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
|
15.9
|
%
|
|
|
12.1
|
%
|
|
|
17.6
|
%
|
Premium revenue
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
Total medical care costs
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
Days in claims payable, fee for service only
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Number of members at end of period
|
|
|
1,498,000
|
|
|
|
1,368,000
|
|
|
|
1,482,000
|
|
|
|
1,455,000
|
|
Number of claims in inventory at end of period
|
|
|
106,300
|
|
|
|
117,100
|
|
|
|
153,700
|
|
|
|
93,100
|
|
Billed charges of claims in inventory at end of period
|
|
$
|
146,600
|
|
|
$
|
173,400
|
|
|
$
|
194,000
|
|
|
$
|
131,400
|
|
Claims in inventory per member at end of period
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
Billed charges of claims in inventory per member at end of period
|
|
$
|
97.86
|
|
|
$
|
126.75
|
|
|
$
|
130.90
|
|
|
$
|
90.31
|
|
Number of claims received during the period
|
|
|
7,029,600
|
|
|
|
6,287,300
|
|
|
|
3,493,300
|
|
|
|
12,930,100
|
|
Billed charges of claims received during the period
|
|
$
|
5,580,400
|
|
|
$
|
4,707,200
|
|
|
$
|
2,760,500
|
|
|
$
|
9,769,000
|
|
Inflation
We use various strategies to mitigate the negative effects of
health care cost inflation. Specifically, our health plans try
to control medical and hospital costs through contracts with
independent providers of health care services. Through these
contracted providers, our health plans emphasize preventive
health care and appropriate use of specialty and hospital
services. There can be no assurance, however, that our
strategies to mitigate health care cost inflation will be
successful. Competitive pressures, new health care and
pharmaceutical product introductions, demands from health care
providers and customers, applicable regulations, or other
factors may affect our ability to control health care costs.
57
Compliance
Costs
Our health plans are regulated by both state and federal
government agencies. Regulation of managed care products and
health care services is an evolving area of law that varies from
jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Regulatory agencies generally have
discretion to issue regulations and interpret and enforce laws
and rules. Changes in applicable laws and rules occur
frequently. Compliance with such laws and rules may lead to
additional costs related to the implementation of additional
systems, procedures and programs that we have not yet identified.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
|
Concentrations
of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to
concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash
equivalents, investments, receivables, and restricted
investments. We invest a substantial portion of our cash in the
PFM Fund Prime Series Institutional Class, and
the PFM Fund Government Series. These funds represent a
portfolio of highly liquid money market securities that are
managed by PFM Asset Management LLC (PFM), a Virginia business
trust registered as an open-end management investment fund. Our
investments and a portion of our cash equivalents are managed by
professional portfolio managers operating under documented
investment guidelines. No investment that is in a loss position
can be sold by our managers without our prior approval. Our
investments consist solely of investment grade debt securities
with a maximum maturity of ten years and an average duration of
four years. Restricted investments are invested principally in
certificates of deposit and treasury securities. Concentration
of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is limited
due to payors consisting principally of the governments of each
state in which our health plans operate.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures: Our management, with the
participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer, has concluded, based upon its evaluation as
of the end of the period covered by this report, that the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act)) are effective to ensure that information required to
be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported
within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting: There has been no change in our
internal control over financial reporting during the six months
ended June 30, 2010 that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls
over financial reporting.
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
The health care industry is subject to numerous laws and
regulations of federal, state, and local governments. Compliance
with these laws and regulations can be subject to government
review and interpretation, as well as regulatory actions unknown
and unasserted at this time. Penalties associated with
violations of these laws and regulations include significant
fines, exclusion from participating in publicly-funded programs,
and the repayment of previously billed and collected revenues.
We are involved in various legal actions in the normal course of
business, some of which seek monetary damages, including claims
for punitive damages, which are not covered by insurance. These
actions, when finally concluded and determined, are not likely,
in our opinion, to have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, cash flows, or results of
operations.
58
Certain risk factors may have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, cash flows, or results of
operations, and you should carefully consider them. The
following risk factors were identified or re-evaluated by the
Company during the second quarter and are a supplement to those
risk factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A
Risk Factors, in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, and to Part II,
Item 1A Risk Factors, in our Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2010. The risks described
herein and in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and
uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently
deem to be immaterial may also materially adversely affect our
business, financial condition, cash flows, or results of
operations.
Continuing
state budget pressures, as well as the scheduled expiration as
of December 31, 2010 of the enhanced Medicaid federal
medical assistance percentage paid to states under the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), could result in
premium rate decreases or the recoupment of previously paid
amounts, either of which could have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition, cash flows, or results of
operations.
Several of the states in which we operate our health plans
continue to face severe budget shortfalls stemming from high
unemployment, record declines in revenue, and increasing demand
for public assistance programs such as Medicaid. These
continuing budget pressures could result in states
unexpectedly and abruptly seeking to reduce the premium rates
paid to our health plans, or even to their seeking to recoup
premium amounts previously paid to our health plans, as has
recently occurred with respect to our Michigan plan. Any such
rate reductions or recoupment of previously paid premium amounts
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, cash flows, or results of operations.
In addition, the increase in the federal share of Medicaid
funding provided to states under ARRA will expire as of
December 31, 2010. The increased funds have helped states
reduce their deficits and support their Medicaid programs. The
scheduled expiration of the ARRA funds as of December 31,
2010 will create a financing cliff in the middle of many state
fiscal years at a time when their budgets are already under
severe financial strain. There have been several unsuccessful
attempts in Congress to pass an extension of the increased
federal share of Medicaid funding. As of August 3, 2010,
Congress is once again considering an extension of Medicaid
funding under ARRA. However, there can be no assurances that a
Medicaid funding extension will be passed by Congress and signed
into law, or, if passed, that it will be sufficient for states
to maintain the same level of Medicaid funding as they had prior
to December 31, 2010. In the event the increased federal
share of Medicaid funding is not extended beyond
December 31, 2010, the resulting budget pressure on the
states in which we operate our health plans could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
cash flows, or results of operations.
We face
periodic routine and non-routine reviews, audits, and
investigations by government agencies, and these reviews and
audits could have adverse findings, which could negatively
impact our business.
We are subject to various routine and non-routine governmental
reviews, audits, and investigations. Violation of the laws,
regulations, or contract provisions governing our operations, or
changes in interpretations of those laws, could result in the
imposition of civil or criminal penalties, the cancellation of
our contracts to provide managed care services, the suspension
or revocation of our licenses, the exclusion from participation
in government sponsored health programs, or the revision and
recoupment of past payments made based on audit findings. For
example, by letter dated July 7, 2010 from the Center for
Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, we were notified that we
had been selected for an
on-site
audit with respect to certain specified Medicare Advantage and
Prescription Drug Plan contracts in the compliance areas of
enrollment and disenrollment, premium billing, Part D
formulary administration, Part D appeals, grievances and
coverage determinations and compliance program. The
on-site
audit was conducted from July 26 to July 30, 2010. We do
not expect to receive written notification of the results of
this audit until September 2010. If we become subject to
material fines or if other sanctions or other corrective actions
were imposed upon us, whether as a result of this most recent
CMS audit or otherwise, we might suffer a substantial reduction
in profitability, and might also lose one or more of our
government contracts and as a result lose significant numbers of
members and amounts of revenue. In addition, government
receivables are subject
59
to government audit and negotiation, and government contracts
are vulnerable to disagreements with the government. The final
amounts we ultimately receive under government contracts may be
different from the amounts we initially recognize in our
financial statements.
We rely
on the accuracy of eligibility lists provided by state
governments. Inaccuracies in those lists would negatively affect
our results of operations.
Premium payments to our health plan segment are based upon
eligibility lists produced by state governments. From time to
time, states require us to reimburse them for premiums paid to
us based on an eligibility list that a state later discovers
contains individuals who are not in fact eligible for a
government sponsored program or are eligible for a different
premium category or a different program. Alternatively, a state
could fail to pay us for members for whom we are entitled to
payment. Our results of operations would be adversely affected
as a result of such reimbursement to the state if we had made
related payments to providers and were unable to recoup such
payments from the providers.
Receipt
of inadequate or significantly delayed premiums could negatively
affect our business, financial condition, cash flows, or results
of operations.
Our premium revenues consist of fixed monthly payments per
member, and supplemental payments for other services such as
maternity deliveries. These premiums are fixed by contract, and
we are obligated during the contract periods to provide health
care services as established by the state governments. We use a
large portion of our revenues to pay the costs of health care
services delivered to our members. If premiums do not increase
when expenses related to medical services rise, our medical
margins will be compressed, and our earnings will be negatively
affected. A state could increase hospital or other provider
rates without making a commensurate increase in the rates paid
to us, or could lower our rates without making a commensurate
reduction in the rates paid to hospitals or other providers. In
addition, if the actuarial assumptions made by a state in
implementing a rate or benefit change are incorrect or are at
variance with the particular utilization patterns of the members
of one of our health plans, our medical margins could be
reduced. Any of these rate adjustments in one or more of the
states in which we operate could adversely affect our business,
financial condition, cash flows, or results of operations.
Furthermore, a state undergoing a budget crisis may
significantly delay the premiums paid to one of our health
plans. During 2008, due to a prolonged budget impasse, some of
the monthly premium payments made by the state of California to
our California health plan were several months late. The state
of California is once again in a budget impasse, and may be
unable to make monthly premium payments to our California health
plan if a budget is not passed by the end of the third quarter
of 2010. Any significant delay in the monthly payment of
premiums to any of our health plans could have a material
adverse affect on our business, financial condition, cash flows,
or results of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Title
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
60
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
MOLINA HEALTHCARE, INC.
|
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 4, 2010
|
|
/s/ JOSEPH M. MOLINA, M.D.
|
|
|
Joseph M. Molina, M.D.
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 4, 2010
|
|
/s/ JOHN C. MOLINA, J.D.
|
|
|
John C. Molina, J.D.
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
61
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Title
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
62