e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the quarterly period ended June 24, 2006 |
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the Transition Period
from to |
Commission File Number 0-17795
CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
DELAWARE |
|
77-0024818 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
2901 Via Fortuna Austin, Texas 78746
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(512) 851-4000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and
large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer o Accelerated
filer þ Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell Company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange
Act). YES o NO þ
The number of shares of the registrants common stock,
$0.001 par value, outstanding as of July 21, 2006 was
87,524,760.
CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 24, 2006
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
Part I.
|
|
ITEM 1. |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 24, | |
|
March 25, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
ASSETS |
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
103,053 |
|
|
$ |
116,675 |
|
|
Restricted investments
|
|
|
5,755 |
|
|
|
5,755 |
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
137,123 |
|
|
|
102,335 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
21,518 |
|
|
|
20,937 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
21,391 |
|
|
|
18,708 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
5,634 |
|
|
|
7,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
294,474 |
|
|
|
272,157 |
|
|
Long-term marketable securities
|
|
|
5,972 |
|
|
|
18,703 |
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
13,263 |
|
|
|
14,051 |
|
Intangibles, net
|
|
|
2,593 |
|
|
|
2,966 |
|
Non-marketable securities
|
|
|
7,947 |
|
|
|
7,947 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
3,293 |
|
|
|
3,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
327,542 |
|
|
$ |
319,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
11,943 |
|
|
$ |
14,129 |
|
|
Accrued salaries and benefits
|
|
|
6,813 |
|
|
|
6,460 |
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
9,694 |
|
|
|
9,909 |
|
|
Deferred income on shipments to distributors
|
|
|
6,199 |
|
|
|
7,098 |
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
1,990 |
|
|
|
2,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
36,639 |
|
|
|
39,824 |
|
|
Other long-term obligations
|
|
|
14,005 |
|
|
|
14,803 |
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock
|
|
|
887,070 |
|
|
|
881,956 |
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(608,971 |
) |
|
|
(616,652 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(1,201 |
) |
|
|
(890 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
276,898 |
|
|
|
264,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
327,542 |
|
|
$ |
319,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated condensed financial statements.
3
CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts; unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
June 24, | |
|
June 25, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
45,181 |
|
|
$ |
52,822 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
18,023 |
|
|
|
25,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin
|
|
|
27,158 |
|
|
|
27,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
11,726 |
|
|
|
13,651 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
11,177 |
|
|
|
14,301 |
|
|
Litigation settlement, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,758 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
22,903 |
|
|
|
3,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
4,255 |
|
|
|
24,106 |
|
|
Realized gain on marketable securities
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
Interest income, net
|
|
|
2,965 |
|
|
|
1,136 |
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
7,468 |
|
|
|
25,611 |
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
(366 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
7,681 |
|
|
$ |
25,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income per share:
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
Diluted income per share:
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
87,196 |
|
|
|
85,230 |
|
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
88,759 |
|
|
|
86,183 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated condensed financial statements.
4
CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands; unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
June 24, | |
|
June 25, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
7,681 |
|
|
$ |
25,977 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,732 |
|
|
|
2,769 |
|
|
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
1,352 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
Gain on marketable securities
|
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
(388 |
) |
|
|
Other non-cash benefits
|
|
|
(511 |
) |
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
Net change in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(4,567 |
) |
|
|
6,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
5,494 |
|
|
|
34,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, equipment and software
|
|
|
(453 |
) |
|
|
(243 |
) |
|
Investments in technology
|
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(425 |
) |
|
Purchase of marketable securities
|
|
|
(52,052 |
) |
|
|
(65,554 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sale and maturity of marketable securities
|
|
|
29,883 |
|
|
|
41,978 |
|
|
Increase in restricted investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
Increase in deposits and other assets
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(313 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(22,878 |
) |
|
|
(24,646 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
3,762 |
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
3,762 |
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(13,622 |
) |
|
|
10,703 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
116,675 |
|
|
|
79,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
103,053 |
|
|
$ |
89,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated condensed financial statements.
5
CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
The consolidated condensed financial statements have been
prepared by Cirrus Logic, Inc. (we, us,
our, or the Company) pursuant to the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC). The accompanying unaudited consolidated
condensed financial statements do not include complete footnotes
and financial presentations. As a result, these financial
statements should be read along with the audited consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended
March 25, 2006, included in our 2006 Annual Report on
Form 10-K. In our
opinion, the financial statements reflect all adjustments,
including normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair
presentation of the financial position, operating results and
cash flows, for those periods presented. The preparation of
financial statements in conformity with United States generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect reported assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses, as well as disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ
from those estimates and assumptions. Moreover, the results of
operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire
year. We maintain a web site at www.cirrus.com,
which makes available free of charge our recent annual report
and all other filings we have made with the SEC.
|
|
|
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements |
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48
(FIN No. 48) Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes, which prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement process for recording in
the financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return. Additionally,
FIN No. 48 provides guidance on the derecognition,
classification, accounting in interim periods and disclosure
requirements for uncertain tax positions. The accounting
provisions of FIN No. 48 will be effective for the Company
beginning April 1, 2007. The Company is in the process of
determining the effect, if any, that the adoption of
FIN No. 48 will have on its financial statements.
|
|
2. |
Stock Based Compensation |
Effective March 26, 2006, the beginning of our fiscal year
2007, the Company adopted the provisions of the FASB
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R)
(SFAS No. 123(R)) and, in doing so,
consulted the guidance provided in Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 107
(SAB No. 107).
SFAS No. 123(R) requires stock based compensation to
be accounted for under the fair value method and requires the
use of an option pricing model for estimating fair value.
Accordingly, share-based compensation is measured at grant date,
based on the fair value of the award. The Company previously
accounted for awards granted under its equity incentive plans
under the intrinsic value method prescribed by Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (APB
No. 25), Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, and related interpretations, and provided
the required pro forma disclosures prescribed by
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, as amended. The exercise price of
options is equal to the closing price of Cirrus common stock on
the date of grant. Accordingly, no share-based compensation,
other than acquisition-related compensation, was recognized in
the financial statements prior to March 25, 2006.
Under the modified prospective method of adoption for
SFAS No. 123(R), the compensation cost recognized by
the Company beginning in fiscal year 2007 includes
(a) compensation cost for all equity incentive awards
granted prior to, but not yet vested as of March 26, 2006,
based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with
the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, and
(b) compensation cost for all equity incentive awards
granted subsequent to March 25, 2006, based on the
grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the
provisions of SFAS No. 123(R). The Company uses the
accelerated method to recognize share-based compensation costs
over the service period of the award. Upon exercise,
cancellation, or expiration of stock options, deferred tax
assets for options with multiple vesting dates are eliminated
for each
6
CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
vesting period on a
first-in, first-out
basis as if each vesting period was a separate award. To
calculate the excess tax benefits available for use in
offsetting future tax shortfalls as of the date of
implementation, the Company followed the guidance in
paragraph 81 of SFAS No. 123(R).
We have various stock incentive plans (the Stock
Plans) under which officers, employees, non-employee
directors and consultants may be granted qualified and
non-qualified options to purchase shares of our authorized but
not issued common stock. Options are priced at the fair market
value of the stock on the date of grant. Options granted to
employees are exercisable upon vesting, generally in traunches
over four years and certain options granted to non-employee
directors are exercisable upon grant. Options expire no later
than ten years from the date of grant.
Share-based compensation recognized in fiscal year 2007 as a
result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), as well as
pro forma disclosures according to the original provisions of
SFAS No. 123 for periods prior to the adoption of
SFAS No. 123(R), use the Black-Scholes option pricing
model for estimating fair value of options granted under the
Companys equity incentive plans.
The following table summarizes the effects of share based
compensation resulting from the application of
SFAS No. 123(R) on cost of goods sold, research and
development, sales, general and administrative, income from
continuing operations before taxes, and net income after taxes
for options granted under the Companys equity incentive
plans (in thousands, except per share amounts; unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
June 24, | |
|
June 25, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Cost of sales
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Sales, general, and administrative
|
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on Income from continuing operations (before taxes)
|
|
|
1,352 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Income Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share based compensation expense (net of taxes)
|
|
$ |
1,352 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share based compensation effects on basic earnings per share
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Share based compensation effects on diluted earnings per share
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Share based compensation effects on operating activities cash
flow
|
|
$ |
1,352 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2007, we received
$3.8 million from the exercise of options granted under the
Companys Stock Plans. As of June 24, 2006, there was
$8.4 million of total unrecognized compensation costs
related to stock options granted under the Companys equity
incentive plans. The unrecognized compensation cost is expected
to be recognized over a weighted average period of
1.4 years.
7
CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of June 24, 2006, approximately 24.7 million shares
of common stock were reserved for issuance under the Stock
Plans. Additional information with respect to stock option
activity is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Options | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
Average | |
|
Aggregate | |
|
|
Available for | |
|
Number of | |
|
Average | |
|
Remaining | |
|
Intrinsic | |
|
|
Grant | |
|
Options | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Contractual | |
|
Value | |
|
|
(thousands) | |
|
(thousands) | |
|
Price | |
|
Term | |
|
(thousands) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding at 3/25/06
|
|
|
17,055 |
|
|
|
11,960 |
|
|
$ |
8.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares auth. for issuance
|
|
|
3,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option plans terminated
|
|
|
(7,085 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
8.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(671 |
) |
|
|
5.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options cancelled
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
6.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
22.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at 6/24/06
|
|
|
13,646 |
|
|
|
11,086 |
|
|
$ |
9.10 |
|
|
|
6.76 |
|
|
$ |
12,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and Expected to Vest at 6/24/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,357 |
|
|
$ |
9.27 |
|
|
|
6.66 |
|
|
$ |
11,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at 6/24/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,997 |
|
|
$ |
10.72 |
|
|
|
5.67 |
|
|
$ |
6,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information regarding outstanding
and exercisable options as of June 24, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding | |
|
Options Exercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Remaining | |
|
Average | |
|
Number of | |
|
Average | |
|
|
Options | |
|
Contractual | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Options | |
|
Exercise | |
Range of Exercise Prices |
|
(in thousands) | |
|
Term | |
|
Price | |
|
(in thousands) | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$ 0.19 - $ 2.60
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
6.56 |
|
|
$ |
2.35 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
$ |
2.32 |
|
$ 2.61 - $ 3.40
|
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
6.99 |
|
|
|
3.40 |
|
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
3.40 |
|
$ 3.41 - $ 5.16
|
|
|
2,145 |
|
|
|
8.24 |
|
|
|
4.88 |
|
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
4.81 |
|
$ 5.17 - $ 6.97
|
|
|
1,434 |
|
|
|
7.25 |
|
|
|
6.56 |
|
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
6.58 |
|
$ 6.98 - $ 9.00
|
|
|
3,284 |
|
|
|
8.28 |
|
|
|
7.68 |
|
|
|
1,301 |
|
|
|
7.66 |
|
$ 9.01 - $14.33
|
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
2.68 |
|
|
|
10.86 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
10.87 |
|
$14.34 - $16.69
|
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
4.74 |
|
|
|
15.86 |
|
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
15.86 |
|
$16.70 - $44.50
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
4.55 |
|
|
|
25.96 |
|
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
25.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,086 |
|
|
|
6.76 |
|
|
$ |
9.10 |
|
|
|
6,997 |
|
|
$ |
10.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 25, 2005, the number of options exercisable was
6.2 million.
Options outstanding that are expected to vest are net of
estimated future option forfeitures in accordance with the
provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), which are estimated
when compensation costs are recognized. Options with a fair
value of $5.5 million and $3.4 million became vested
during the first quarter of fiscal years 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
In the first quarter of fiscal year 2006, if we had recorded
compensation cost for the Stock Plans based upon the
Black-Scholes fair value at the grant date for awards under the
Stock Plans consistent with the
8
CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
optional methodology prescribed under SFAS No. 123,
the net income and earnings per share would have been as shown
below (in thousands, except per share amounts; unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
June 25, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
Net income as reported
|
|
$ |
25,977 |
|
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in
reported net income, net of related tax effects
|
|
|
15 |
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value-based method for all awards, net of
tax related effects
|
|
|
(2,262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proforma net income
|
|
$ |
23,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share as reported
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
Proforma basic net income per share
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
Diluted net income per share as reported
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
Proforma diluted net income per share
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value
of the options were amortized to expense over the vesting period
(for options) using the accelerated method.
We estimated the fair value of each option grant on the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model using the
following additional weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
June 24, | |
|
June 25, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Employee Option Plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
|
40.99 |
% |
|
|
94.39 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.99 |
% |
|
|
3.70 |
% |
Expected life post-vest (in years)
|
|
|
3.61 |
|
|
|
4.08 |
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
50.00 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
3.32 |
% |
Expected life post-vest (in years)
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
In the second quarter of fiscal year 2006, we began to base our
expected volatility on implied volatility as management has
determined that implied volatility is more reflective of market
conditions and a better indicator of expected volatility than
historical volatility. We establish implied volatility based on
market factors in the five days leading up to the grant date. We
do not take any post-grant market information into account when
establishing implied volatility. The expected life of options
granted is based on the historical lives of all options
cancelled or exercised and the expected lives of all options
outstanding at June 24, 2006. The Company continues to base
the estimate of risk-free rate on the U.S. Treasury yield
curve in effect at the time of grant. The Company has never paid
cash dividends and does not currently intend to pay cash
dividends. In accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), the
Company adjusts share-based compensation on a quarterly basis
for changes to the estimate of expected equity award forfeitures
based on actual forfeiture experience. The effect of adjusting
the forfeiture rate for all expense amortization after
March 26, 2006 is recognized in the period the forfeiture
estimate is changed.
9
CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Using the Black-Scholes option valuation model, the weighted
average estimated fair values of employee stock options granted
for both the first quarter of fiscal years 2007 and 2006 were
$3.08.
|
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
In March 1989, we adopted the 1989 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(ESPP). As of June 24, 2006,
900,000 shares of common stock were reserved for future
issuance under this plan. During the first quarter of fiscal
year 2007 and 2006 we issued approximately 26,000 and
189,000 shares, respectively, under the ESPP. In fiscal
year 2006, the Board of Directors of the Company approved an
amendment to the ESPP eliminating the six-month look back
feature of the plan as well as modifying the plan to reduce the
discount to 5 percent. This modification became effective
for all ESPP options granted under the most recently completed
plan period, which ended on June 24, 2006. Therefore, the
plan is no longer compensatory. The weighted average estimated
fair value for purchase rights granted under the ESPP in the
first quarter of fiscal year 2006 was $1.64.
The following are the components of accounts receivable (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 24, | |
|
March 25, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
Gross accounts receivable
|
|
$ |
21,656 |
|
|
$ |
21,133 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,518 |
|
|
$ |
20,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories are comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 24, | |
|
March 25, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
Work in process
|
|
$ |
10,507 |
|
|
$ |
10,662 |
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
10,884 |
|
|
|
8,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,391 |
|
|
$ |
18,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Intangibles, net
The following information details the gross carrying amount and
accumulated amortization of our intangible assets (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 24, 2006 | |
|
As of March 25, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
|
Carrying | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Amount | |
|
Amortization | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
Core Technology
|
|
$ |
1,390 |
|
|
$ |
(798 |
) |
|
$ |
1,390 |
|
|
$ |
(759 |
) |
License Agreements
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
(240 |
) |
Existing Technology
|
|
|
2,730 |
|
|
|
(2,730 |
) |
|
|
2,730 |
|
|
|
(2,686 |
) |
Trademarks
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
(320 |
) |
Technology Licenses
|
|
|
11,804 |
|
|
|
(9,990 |
) |
|
|
11,622 |
|
|
|
(9,531 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,684 |
|
|
$ |
(14,091 |
) |
|
$ |
16,502 |
|
|
$ |
(13,536 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Amortization expense for all intangibles in the first quarter of
fiscal years 2007 and 2006 was $0.6 million and
$1.4 million, respectively. The decrease in the
amortization expense was the result of the transfer of
intangible assets with a gross carrying amount of
$49.1 million and accumulated amortization of
$44.5 million in connection with the sale of assets to
Magnum Semiconductor in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006.
The following table details the estimated aggregate amortization
expense for all of our intangibles as of June 24, 2006 for
the remainder of fiscal year 2007 and for each of the five
succeeding fiscal years (in thousands; unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
For the remainder of the year ended March 31, 2007
|
|
$ |
943 |
|
For the year ended March 29, 2008
|
|
|
1,055 |
|
For the year ended March 28, 2009
|
|
|
327 |
|
For the year ended March 27, 2010
|
|
|
250 |
|
For the year ended March 26, 2011
|
|
|
18 |
|
For the year ended March 25, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
We realized a net income tax benefit of $0.2 million for
the first quarter of fiscal year 2007, compared with a net
income tax benefit of $0.4 million for the comparable
period of fiscal year 2006. The fiscal year 2007 and 2006
benefits stem primarily from the expiration of the statute of
limitations for years in which certain foreign income tax
exposures for transfer pricing issues had existed. The fiscal
year 2007 benefit is net of
non-U.S. income
taxes and U.S. alternative minimum tax. Our tax expense for
the first quarter of fiscal year 2007 was less than the Federal
statutory rate due primarily to the utilization of a portion of
our U.S. deferred tax asset, on which there had been placed
a full valuation allowance, and the release of certain tax
contingency reserves.
Our taxes payable balance is comprised primarily of tax
contingencies that are recorded to address exposures involving
tax positions we have taken that are subject to challenge by
taxing authorities. Our tax contingencies are established based
on past experiences and judgments about potential actions by
taxing jurisdictions and solely relate to transfer pricing
positions we have taken in a variety of countries in which we
operate. The ultimate resolution of these matters may be
materially greater or less than the amount that we have accrued.
We account for income taxes in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard No. 109
(SFAS 109), Accounting for Income
Taxes, which provides for the recognition of deferred
tax assets if realization of such assets is more likely than
not. We have provided a valuation allowance equal to our net
U.S. deferred tax assets due to uncertainties regarding
their realization. We evaluate the realizability of our deferred
tax assets on a quarterly basis.
|
|
7. |
Restructuring and Other Costs |
As of June 24, 2006, we had a remaining accrual from all of
our past restructurings of $6.2 million, primarily related
to net lease expenses that will be paid over their respective
lease terms through fiscal year 2013, along with other
anticipated lease termination costs. We have classified
$4.5 million of this restructuring accrual as long-term.
11
CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table details the changes in all of our
restructuring accruals during the three months ended
June 24, 2006 (in thousands; unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 25, | |
|
Charges to |
|
Cash | |
|
|
|
June 24, | |
Description |
|
2006 | |
|
P&L |
|
Payments | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Severance fiscal year 2006
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(58 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(58 |
) |
Facilities abandonment fiscal year 2006
|
|
|
1,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,836 |
|
Facilities abandonment fiscal year 2004
|
|
|
4,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(311 |
) |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
4,016 |
|
Facilities abandonment fiscal year 1999
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,547 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(479 |
) |
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
6,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share is based on the weighted effect of
common shares issued and outstanding and is calculated by
dividing net income by the basic weighted average shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is
calculated by dividing net income by the basic weighted average
number of common shares used in the basic net income per share
calculation plus the number of common shares that would be
issued assuming exercise or conversion of all potentially
dilutive common shares outstanding.
The weighted average outstanding options excluded from our
diluted calculation as of June 24, 2006 and June 25,
2005 were 4,846,000 and 8,718,000 respectively, as they were
anti-dilutive.
On December 8, 2004, Silvaco Data Systems
(Silvaco) filed suit against us, and others,
alleging misappropriation of trade secrets, conversion, unfair
business practices, and civil conspiracy. Silvacos
complaint stems from a trade secret dispute between Silvaco and
a software vendor, Circuit Semantics, Inc., who supplied us with
certain software design tools. Silvaco alleges that our use of
Circuit Semantics design tools infringes upon
Silvacos trade secrets and that we are liable for
compensatory damages in the sum of $10 million. Silvaco has
not indicated how it will substantiate this amount of damages
and we are unable to reasonably estimate the amount of damages,
if any.
On January 25, 2005, we answered Silvacos complaint
by denying any wrong-doing. In addition, we filed a
cross-complaint against Silvaco alleging breach of contract
relating to Silvacos refusal to provide certain technology
that would enable us to use certain unrelated software tools.
We intend to defend the lawsuit vigorously. In addition, Circuit
Semantics is obligated to defend and indemnify us pursuant to
our license agreement with them for the software. However, we
cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this litigation and we
are unable to estimate any potential liability we may incur.
From time to time, other various claims, charges and litigation
are asserted or commenced against us arising from, or related
to, contractual matters, intellectual property, employment
disputes, as well as other issues. Frequent claims and
litigation involving these types of issues are not uncommon in
the integrated circuits industry. As to any of these claims or
litigation, we cannot predict the ultimate outcome with
certainty.
12
CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of comprehensive income, net of tax, are as
follows (in thousands; unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
June 24, | |
|
June 25, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
7,681 |
|
|
$ |
25,977 |
|
Adjustments to arrive at comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
127 |
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains included in net
income
|
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
7,370 |
|
|
$ |
26,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are a premier supplier of high-precision analog and
mixed-signal integrated circuits (ICs) for a broad
range of consumer and industrial markets. We develop and market
ICs and embedded software used by original equipment
manufacturers. We also provide complete system reference designs
based on our technology that enable our customers to bring
products to market in a timely and cost-effective manner. We
determine our operating segments in accordance with
SFAS 131. Our chief executive office (CEO) has
been identified as the chief operating decision maker as defined
by SFAS 131.
Our CEO receives and uses enterprise-wide financial information
to assess financial performance and allocate resources, rather
than detailed information at a product line level. Additionally,
our product lines have similar characteristics and customers.
They share operations support functions such as sales, public
relations, supply chain management, various research and
development and engineering support, in addition to the general
and administrative functions of human resources, legal, finance
and information technology. As of June 24, 2006, we have
one operating segment with three different product lines.
In accordance with SFAS 131, below is a summary of our net
sales by product line (in thousands; unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
June 24, | |
|
June 25, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Mixed-signal audio products
|
|
$ |
21,606 |
|
|
$ |
23,379 |
|
Embedded products
|
|
|
12,635 |
|
|
|
12,548 |
|
Industrial products
|
|
|
10,940 |
|
|
|
7,766 |
|
Video products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
45,181 |
|
|
$ |
52,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
ITEM 2. |
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following discussion should be read along with the unaudited
consolidated condensed financial statements and notes thereto
included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report, as well as the
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations for the fiscal year ended
March 25, 2006, contained in our 2006 Annual Report on
Form 10-K. This
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations and certain information incorporated
herein by reference contain forward-looking statements within
the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995, Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933,
as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements are based
on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections
and the beliefs and assumptions of our management including,
without limitation, our expectations regarding second quarter
sales, gross margins, and combined research and development and
selling, general and administrative expenses. In some cases,
forward-looking statements are identified by words such as
expect, anticipate, target,
project, believe, goals,
estimates, intend and variations of
these types of words and similar expressions are intended to
identify these forward-looking statements. In addition, any
statements that refer to our plans, expectations, strategies or
other characterizations of future events or circumstances are
forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that these
forward-looking statements are predictions and are subject to
risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to
predict. Therefore, actual results may differ materially and
adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking
statements. We undertake no obligation to revise or update
publicly any forward-looking statement for any reason.
Among the important factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those indicated by our forward-looking
statements are those discussed in
Item 1A Risk Factors in our
2006 Annual Report on
Form 10-K. Readers
should carefully review these risk factors, as well as those
identified in the documents filed by us with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, specifically the most recent reports on
Form 10-K, 10-Q
and 8-K, each as
it may be amended from time to time.
Cirrus Logic (we, us, our,
or the Company) develops high-precision analog and
mixed-signal integrated circuits (ICs) for a broad
range of consumer and industrial markets. Building on our
diverse analog mixed-signal patent portfolio, we deliver highly
optimized products for consumer and commercial audio, automotive
entertainment and industrial applications. We also provide
complete system reference designs based on our technology that
facilitate our customers ability to bring products to
market in a timely and cost-effective manner.
Overview
We develop high-precision, analog and mixed-signal integrated
circuits for a broad range of consumer and industrial markets.
Building on our diverse analog mixed-signal patent portfolio,
Cirrus Logic delivers highly optimized products for consumer and
commercial audio, automotive entertainment and industrial
applications. We develop and market ICs and embedded software
used by original equipment manufacturers. We also provide
complete system reference designs based on our technology that
enable our customers to bring products to market in a timely and
cost-effective manner.
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2007, we saw an increase
in our mixed-signal audio, embedded product and industrial
product revenues from the comparable period of the prior year.
Overall, however, we saw a decrease in total revenue from the
comparable quarter of fiscal year 2006 due to the absence of
$9.1 million in revenues from the digital video product
line, a product line we divested on June 30, 2005. Since
our divestiture of the video product line assets, we have been
able to capitalize on our strengths in analog and mixed-signal
ICs by eliminating costs, improving our gross margins, and
increasing our free cash flow.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our discussion and analysis of the Companys financial
condition and results of operations are based upon the
consolidated condensed financial statements included in this
report, which have been prepared in
14
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States. The preparation of these financial statements
requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the
reported amounts. We evaluate the estimates on an on-going
basis. We base these estimates on historical experience and on
various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under
the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for
making judgments about the carrying values of assets and
liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Actual results may differ from these estimates under different
assumptions and conditions. We also have policies that we
consider to be key accounting policies, such as our policies for
revenue recognition, including the deferral of revenues and
gross margin on sales to our distributors; however, these
policies do not meet the definition of critical accounting
estimates because they do not generally require us to make
estimates or judgments that are difficult or subjective.
We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our
more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation
of the consolidated condensed financial statements:
|
|
|
|
|
For purposes of calculating stock compensation expense under the
provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Boards
(FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123(R) (SFAS No. 123(R)), we
perform an analysis of current market data to calculate an
estimate of implied volatility, the expected term of the option
and the expected forfeiture rate. We use these estimates as
variables in the Black Scholes option pricing model. Depending
upon the number of stock options granted, any fluctuations in
these calculations could have a material effect on the results
presented in our Consolidated Condensed Statement of Operations.
See Note 2 in the Notes to our Consolidated Condensed
Financials Statements contained in
Item 1 Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
Our taxes payable balance is comprised primarily of tax
contingencies that are recorded to address exposures involving
tax positions we have taken that are subject to challenge by
taxing authorities. Our tax contingencies relate to transfer
pricing positions we have taken in a variety of countries in
which we operate. The ultimate resolution of these matters may
be materially greater or less than the amount that we have
accrued. See Note 6 in the Notes to our Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements contained in
Item 1 Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
We provide for the recognition of deferred tax assets in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 109 (SFAS No. 109),
Accounting for Income Taxes, if realization of
such assets is more likely than not. We have provided a
valuation allowance equal to our net U.S. deferred tax
assets due to uncertainties regarding their realization. We
evaluate the realizability of our deferred tax assets on a
quarterly basis. In the event we are able to determine that it
is more likely than not that we will realize some or all of our
U.S. deferred tax assets, then an adjustment to the
deferred tax asset would increase either income or contributed
capital in the period such determination was made. See
Note 6 in the Notes to our Consolidated Condensed Financial
Statements contained in Item 1
Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
Inventories are recorded at the lower of cost or market, with
cost being determined on a
first-in, first-out
basis. We write down inventories to net realizable value based
on forecasted demand, management judgment and the age of
inventory. Actual demand and market conditions may be different
from those projected by management, which could have a material
effect on our operating results and financial position. See
Note 4 in the Notes to our Consolidated Condensed Financial
Statements contained in Item 1
Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
Restructuring charges for workforce reductions and facilities
consolidations reflected in the accompanying financial
statements were accrued based upon specific plans established by
management, in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force
No. 94-3
(EITF 94-3),
Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination
Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain
Costs Incurred in a Restructuring) or SFAS 146,
Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities depending upon the time of the
restructuring activity. We use an estimated borrowing rate as
the discount rate for all of our restructuring accruals made
under SFAS 146. Our facilities consolidation accruals are
based upon our estimates as to the length of time a facility
would be vacant, as well as the amount of sublease income we
would receive once we sublet the facility, after considering |
15
|
|
|
|
|
current and projected market conditions. Changes in these
estimates could result in an adjustment to our restructuring
accruals in a future quarter, which could have a material effect
on our operating results and financial position. See Note 7
in the Notes to our Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
contained in Item 1 Financial
Statements. |
|
|
|
Our available-for-sale investments, non-marketable securities
and other investments are subject to a periodic impairment
review pursuant to Emerging Issues Task Force
03-1
(EITF 03-1):
The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its
Application to Certain Investments. Investments are
considered to be impaired when a decline in fair value is judged
to be other-than-temporary. This determination requires
significant judgment and actual results may be materially
different than our estimate. Marketable securities are evaluated
for impairment if the decline in fair value below cost basis is
significant and/or has lasted for an extended period of time.
Non-marketable securities or other investments are considered to
be impaired when a decline in fair value is judged to be
other-than-temporary. For investments accounted for using the
cost method of accounting, we evaluate information (e.g.,
budgets, business plans, financial statements, etc.) in addition
to quoted market price, if any, in determining whether an
other-than-temporary decline in value exists. Factors indicative
of an other-than-temporary decline include recurring operating
losses, credit defaults and subsequent rounds of financings at
an amount below the cost basis of the investment. This list is
not all inclusive and we weigh all quantitative and qualitative
factors in determining if an other-than-temporary decline in
value of an investment has occurred. When a decline in value is
deemed to be other-than-temporary, we recognize an impairment
loss in the current periods operating results to the
extent of the decline. Actual values could be different from
those estimated by management, which could have a material
effect on our operating results and financial position. |
|
|
|
We evaluate the recoverability of property and equipment and
intangible assets in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard No. 144 (SFAS 144),
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets. We test for impairment losses on long-lived
assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are
present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be
generated by those assets are less than the assets
carrying amounts. An impairment loss is recognized in the event
the carrying value of these assets exceeds the fair value of the
applicable assets. Impairment evaluations involve management
estimates of asset useful lives and future cash flows. Actual
useful lives and cash flows could be different from those
estimated by management, which could have a material effect on
our operating results and financial position. See Note 5 in
the Notes to our Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
contained in Item 1 Financial
Statements. |
|
|
|
We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated
losses resulting from the inability or failure of our customers
to make required payments. We regularly evaluate our allowance
for doubtful accounts based upon the age of the receivable, our
ongoing customer relations, as well as any disputes with the
customer. If the financial condition of our customers were to
deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make
payments, additional allowances may be required, which could
have a material effect on our operating results and financial
position. Additionally, we may maintain an allowance for
doubtful accounts for estimated losses on receivables from
customers with whom we are involved in litigation. See
Note 3 in the Notes to our Consolidated Condensed Financial
Statements contained in Item 1
Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
We are subject to the possibility of loss contingencies for
various legal matters. See Note 9 in the Notes to our
Consolidated Financial Statements contained in
Item 1 Financial Statements.
We regularly evaluate current information available to us to
determine whether any accruals should be made based on the
status of the case, the results of the discovery process and
other factors. If we ultimately determine that an accrual should
be made for a legal matter, this accrual could have a material
effect on our operating results and financial position and the
ultimate outcome may be materially different than our estimate. |
16
Results of Operations
The following table summarizes the results of our operations for
the first quarter of fiscal years 2007 and 2006 as a percent of
net sales. All percent amounts were calculated using the
underlying data in thousands, unaudited:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
June 24, | |
|
June 25, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Mixed-signal audio products
|
|
|
48% |
|
|
|
44 |
% |
Embedded products
|
|
|
28% |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
Industrial products
|
|
|
24% |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Video products
|
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Cost of sales
|
|
|
40% |
|
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
Gross Margin
|
|
|
60% |
|
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
26% |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
25% |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
Litigation settlement, net
|
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
(47 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
51% |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
9% |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
Realized gain on marketable securities
|
|
|
1% |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
Interest income, net
|
|
|
7% |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
17% |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
17% |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales for the first quarter of fiscal year 2007 decreased
$7.6 million to $45.2 million from $52.8 million
from the first quarter of fiscal year 2006. Industrial products
net sales increased $3.2 million, or 41 percent,
during the first quarter of fiscal year 2007 from the comparable
quarter of the prior fiscal year due in large part to an
increase in demand for seismic and industrial measurement
products. Net sales from our Mixed-Signal products declined
$1.8 million, or 8 percent, due primarily to a
decrease in demand for certain
digital-to-analog
converter products used in low end DVD players. Revenues in the
first quarter of fiscal year 2006 included $9.1 million in
revenue from the digital video product line, a product line
divested on June 30, 2005.
Export sales, principally to Asia, including sales to
U.S.-based customers
with manufacturing plants overseas, were 66 percent and
71 percent of net sales during the first quarter of fiscal
years 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Our sales are denominated primarily in U.S. dollars. As a
result, we have not entered into foreign currency forward
exchange and option contracts.
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2007, Avnet, Inc., a
distributor, represented 28 percent of our net sales.
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 Avnet, Inc.
(formerly Memec Group Holdings Limited) and LG Electronics, an
end customer, represented 22 percent and 11 percent of
our net sales, respectively.
17
We expect our net sales to range between $47 million and
$50 million for the second quarter of fiscal year 2007.
Gross margin was 60.1 percent in the first quarter of
fiscal year 2007, up from 51.7 percent in the first quarter
of fiscal year 2006. The largest driver of the increase in gross
margin related to changes in product mix primarily from the
divestiture of the digital video product line, which tended to
have lower margins. Additionally, we experienced growth in
revenues from the Industrial product line, which tends to
generate higher average margins. Gross margins in the first
quarter of fiscal year 2006 were negatively impacted by the
digital video product line, which had low gross margins and
represented 17.3 percent of total revenue. During the first
quarter of fiscal year 2007, the sale of products that had been
written down in prior periods contributed approximately
$0.7 million, or 2.7 percent of gross margin, compared
to a 3.3 percent contribution in the first quarter of
fiscal year 2006.
We expect our gross margin to range between 58 percent and
60 percent for the second quarter of fiscal year 2007.
|
|
|
Research and Development Expense |
Research and development expense for the first quarter of fiscal
year 2007 of $11.7 million decreased approximately
$2.0 million from $13.7 million in the first quarter
of fiscal year 2006. This decrease was primarily due to reduced
salaries and benefits costs resulting from reductions in
headcount from the prior fiscal year primarily associated with
the divestiture of the digital video product line assets. With
the adoption of SFAS 123(R), research and development
expenses for the first quarter of fiscal year 2007 also included
$0.5 million of stock compensation expense.
|
|
|
Selling, General and Administrative Expense |
Selling, general and administrative expense in the first quarter
of fiscal year 2007 of $11.2 million decreased by
$3.1 million from $14.3 million in the first quarter
of fiscal year 2006. This decrease was due to the absence in the
first quarter of fiscal year 2007 of a charge taken to
facilities expense for a loss contingency on sub-leases entered
into during the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 as we
sub-leased excess office space for less than our current rent
obligations. This decrease was partially offset by
$0.8 million in compensation expense recognized in the
first quarter of fiscal year 2007 as a result of our adoption of
SFAS 123(R).
We expect our combined research and development and selling,
general and administrative expenses to be between
$23.5 million and $24.5 million for the second quarter
of fiscal year 2007. This estimate includes approximately
$1.4 million of stock compensation expense.
|
|
|
Realized Gain on Marketable Equity Securities |
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2007, we realized a gain
of $0.2 million related to the sale of an investment in
Prudential Financial, Inc. During the first quarter of fiscal
year 2006, we realized a gain of $0.4 million related to
the sale of our investment in Silicon Laboratories, Inc., which
resulted from their acquisition of Cygnal Integrated Products,
Inc.
Interest income was $3.0 million for the first quarter of
fiscal year 2007 and $1.1 million for the first quarter of
fiscal year 2006. The increase of $1.9 million was
primarily due to increased cash and cash equivalent balances on
which interest is earned coupled with higher rates of return on
our investment portfolio.
We realized a net income tax benefit of $0.2 million for
the first quarter of fiscal year 2007, compared with a net
income tax benefit of $0.4 million for the comparable
period of fiscal year 2006. The fiscal years 2007 and 2006
18
benefits stem from the expiration of the statute of limitations
for years in which certain foreign income tax exposures for
transfer pricing issues had existed. The fiscal year 2007
benefit is net of
non-U.S. income
taxes and U.S. alternative minimum tax. Our tax expense for
the first quarter of fiscal year 2007 was less than the Federal
statutory rate due primarily to the utilization of a portion of
our U.S. deferred tax asset, on which there had been placed
a full valuation allowance, and the release of certain tax
contingency reserves.
We account for income taxes in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard No. 109
(SFAS 109), Accounting for Income
Taxes, which provides for the recognition of deferred
tax assets if realization of such assets is more likely than
not. We have provided a valuation allowance equal to our net
deferred tax assets due to uncertainties regarding their
realization. We evaluate the realizability of our deferred tax
assets on a quarterly basis.
|
|
|
New Accounting Pronouncements |
Effective March 26, 2006, the beginning of our fiscal year
2007, the Company adopted the provisions of
SFAS No. 123(R) and, in doing so, consulted the
guidance provided in SAB No. 107. The Company
previously accounted for awards granted under its equity
incentive plans under the intrinsic value method prescribed by
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (APB
No. 25), Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, and related interpretations, and provided
the required pro forma disclosures prescribed by
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, as amended. Prior to the adoption of
SFAS No. 123(R), based on the terms of the equity
awards granted to employees, the Company valued awards under the
provisions of APB No. 25 and, therefore, did not recognize
any compensation related expenses related to these awards.
In making the transition to this new accounting standard, the
Company chose to use the modified prospective approach. Under
the modified prospective method of adoption for
SFAS No. 123(R), the compensation cost recognized by
the Company beginning in fiscal year 2007 includes
(a) compensation cost for all equity incentive awards
granted prior to, but not yet vested as of March 26, 2006,
based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with
the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, and
(b) compensation cost for all equity incentive awards
granted subsequent to March 26, 2006, based on the
grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the
provisions of SFAS No. 123(R). Using this approach had
no effect on our prior period financial statements.
As of June 24, 2006, there was $8.4 million of total
unrecognized compensation costs related to stock options granted
under the Stock Plans. The unrecognized compensation cost is
expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
1.4 years.
|
|
|
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements |
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48
(FIN No. 48) Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes which prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement process for recording in
the financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return. Additionally,
FIN No. 48 provides guidance on the derecognition,
classification, accounting in interim periods and disclosure
requirements for uncertain tax positions. The accounting
provisions of FIN No. 48 will be effective for the Company
beginning April 1, 2007. The Company is in the process of
determining the effect, if any, that the adoption of
FIN No. 48 will have on its financial statements.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2007, we generated
approximately $5.5 million of cash and cash equivalents
from operating activities. Operating cash flows in this quarter
included a $1.4 million non cash adjustment for stock
compensation expense recognized under SFAS 123(R). The
primary increase in cash from operations was related to the cash
components of our net income, partially offset by a decrease in
accounts payable of $2.2 million coupled with increases in
accounts receivable and net inventory of $0.6 million and
$2.7 million, respectively. In the comparable period of
fiscal year 2006, we generated
19
approximately $34.3 million of cash and cash equivalents in
our operating activities primarily due to a $25 million
settlement of our Fujitsu litigation coupled with a large
decrease in our inventory of $7.1 million.
Net cash used in investing activities was $22.9 million
during the first quarter of fiscal year 2007. This was primarily
the result of the purchase of $52.1 million of
available-for-sale securities offset by the sale of
$29.9 million in available-for-sale securities. Purchases
of property and equipment and technology licenses amounted to
$0.6 million during the quarter. During the first quarter
of fiscal year 2006, we used approximately $24.6 million in
cash for investing activities, primarily related to the purchase
of certain available-for-sale securities of $65.6 million,
partially offset by the sale and maturity of certain
available-for-sale securities of $42.0 million along with
purchases of property and equipment and technology licenses
totaling $0.7 million.
We generated $3.8 million and $1.1 million in cash
from financing activities during the first quarter of fiscal
years 2007 and 2006, respectively, due to the issuance of common
stock in connection with option exercises and our employee stock
purchase plan.
As of June 24, 2006, we have restricted cash of
$5.7 million which primarily secures certain obligations
under our lease agreement for the headquarters and engineering
facility in Austin, Texas.
We have not paid cash dividends on our common stock and
currently intend to continue our policy of retaining any
earnings for reinvestment in our business. Although we cannot
assure that we will be able to generate cash in the future, we
anticipate that our existing capital resources and cash flow
generated from future operations will enable us to maintain our
current level of operations for at least the next 12 months.
|
|
ITEM 3. |
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK |
We are exposed to market risks associated with interest rates on
our debt securities and currency movements on
non-U.S. dollar
denominated assets and liabilities. We assess these risks on a
regular basis and have established policies to protect against
the adverse effects of these and other potential exposures.
There have been no significant changes in our interest or
foreign exchange risk since we filed our 2006 Annual Report on
Form 10-K on
May 25, 2006.
|
|
ITEM 4. |
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
|
|
|
Evaluation of disclosure control and procedures |
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried
out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures
pursuant to
Rule 13a-15 and
Rule 15d-15 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based upon that
evaluation, the CEO and the Chief Financial Officer
(CFO) concluded that, as of June 24, 2006, our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective at providing
reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed
by us in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and that our
controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to
material information required to be included in this report.
|
|
|
Changes in control over financial reporting |
There has been no change in our internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to
materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II
|
|
ITEM 1. |
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
On December 8, 2004, Silvaco Data Systems
(Silvaco) filed suit against us, and others,
alleging misappropriation of trade secrets, conversion, unfair
business practices, and civil conspiracy. Silvacos
20
complaint stems from a trade secret dispute between Silvaco and
a software vendor, Circuit Semantics, Inc., who supplied us with
certain software design tools. Silvaco alleges that our use of
Circuit Semantics design tools infringes upon
Silvacos trade secrets and that we are liable for
compensatory damages in the sum of $10 million. Silvaco has
not indicated how it will substantiate this amount of damages
and we are unable to reasonably estimate the amount of damages,
if any.
On January 25, 2005, we answered Silvacos complaint
by denying any wrong-doing. In addition, we filed a
cross-complaint against Silvaco alleging breach of contract
relating to Silvacos refusal to provide certain technology
that would enable us to use certain unrelated software tools.
We intend to defend the lawsuit vigorously. In addition, Circuit
Semantics is obligated to defend and indemnify us pursuant to
our license agreement with them for the software. However, we
cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this litigation and we
are unable to estimate any potential liability we may incur.
From time to time, other various claims, charges and litigation
are asserted or commenced against us arising from, or related
to, contractual matters, intellectual property, employment
disputes, as well as other issues. Frequent claims and
litigation involving these types of issues are not uncommon in
the IC industry. As to any of these claims or litigation, we
cannot predict the ultimate outcome with certainty.
In evaluating all forward-looking statements, readers should
specifically consider risk factors that may cause actual results
to vary from those contained in the forward-looking statements.
Various risk factors associated with our business are included
in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended March 25, 2006, as filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on May 25,
2006 and available at www.sec.gov. There have been no
material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in
our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended March 25, 2006.
(a) Exhibits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
.1 |
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant, filed with the
Delaware Secretary of State on August 26, 1998.(1) |
|
|
3 |
.2 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, filed with the Delaware Secretary
of State on February 17, 1999.(1) |
|
|
3 |
.3 |
|
Certificate of Designation of Rights, Preferences and Privileges
of Series A Preferred Stock, filed with the Delaware
Secretary of State on March 30, 1999.(1) |
|
|
3 |
.4 |
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Registrant.(2) |
|
|
3 |
.5 |
|
Certificate of Elimination dated May 26, 2005.(3) |
|
|
10 |
.19 |
|
Employment Agreement by and between Registrant and Gregory S.
Thomas dated May 24, 2006.(4) |
|
|
31 |
.1* |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
31 |
.2* |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32 |
.1* |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32 |
.2* |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
* |
Filed with this
Form 10-Q. |
|
(1) |
Incorporated by reference from Registrants Report on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2001, filed with the Commission
on June 22, 2001. |
|
(2) |
Incorporated by reference from Registrants Report on
Form 8-K filed
with the Commission on September 21, 2005. |
|
(3) |
Incorporated by reference from Registrants Report on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended March 26, 2005, filed with the Commission
on May 27, 2005. |
|
(4) |
Incorporated by reference from Registrants Report on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended March 25, 2006, filed with the Commission
on May 25, 2006. |
21
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
Date: July 28, 2006
|
|
By: /s/ John T.
Kurtzweil
John
T. Kurtzweil
Chief Financial Officer |
22