FORM 10-K
United States
Securities and Exchange Commission
[X]
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2004
OR
[ ]
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-10684
International Game Technology
Nevada | 88-0173041 | |
(State of Incorporation) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
9295 Prototype Drive, Reno, Nevada 89521
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (775) 448-7777
Registrants website: www.IGT.com
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class | Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered | |
Common Stock, Par Value $.00015625 | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes [X] No [ ]
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of March 31, 2004: $15,948,670,676
The number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common stock, as of November 27, 2004: 346,367,231 shares of Common Stock, $.00015625 Par Value
Table of Contents
i
Part I
Item 1. Business
COMPANY OVERVIEW
International Game Technology is recognized as a leader in the design, development, manufacturing, distribution and sales of computerized gaming machines and systems products in all jurisdictions where gaming is legal. During fiscal 2004, we redefined our business segments under a reorganization of management responsibilities to cover all products in distinct geographical areas. This new structure shifted our focus to managing the business by customer regions encompassing all sources and types of revenue. We currently view our business in two regional operating segments, the North America Division and the International Division, each incorporating all relevant sources of revenues from product sales and gaming operations. We strive to diversify our business with our presence in gaming markets worldwide and the breadth of our product offerings.
International Game Technology principally served the United States (US) gaming industry when founded in 1980, expanding into jurisdictions outside of the US in 1986. In addition to our US production facility in Reno, Nevada, we also manufacture our products in the United Kingdom (UK) and through third party manufacturers in Japan and Canada. We currently maintain sales offices in various locations across the US, Australia, Canada, Europe, Japan, Latin America, New Zealand, South Africa and the UK.
International Game Technology was incorporated in Nevada in December 1980 to acquire the gaming licensee and operating entity, IGT, and to facilitate our initial public offering. In addition to our 100% ownership of IGT, International Game Technology has the following directly or indirectly wholly-owned subsidiaries:
ª | Acres Gaming Incorporated (Acres) | |||
ª | I.G.T.-Argentina S.A. (IGT-Argentina) | |||
ª | I.G.T. Australia Pty. Limited (IGT-Australia) | |||
ª | International Game Technology NZ Ltd. (IGT-NZ) | |||
ª | IGT do Brasil Ltda. (IGT-Brazil) | |||
ª | IGT-Europe B.V. (IGT-Europe) | |||
ª | IGT-Iceland Ltd. (IGT-Iceland) | |||
ª | IGT-Japan K.K. (IGT-Japan) | |||
ª | IGT-UK Limited (Barcrest) | |||
ª | International Game Technology-Africa Pty. Limited (IGT-Africa) | |||
ª | International Game Technology S.R. Ltda. (IGT-Peru) | |||
ª | Silicon Gaming, Inc. (Silicon) | |||
ª | VLC, Inc. (VLC) |
Unless the context indicates otherwise, references to International Game Technology, IGT, we, our, or the Company includes International Game Technology and our wholly-owned subsidiaries and their subsidiaries. Our principal executive offices are located at 9295 Prototype Drive, Reno, Nevada 89521; our telephone number is (775) IGT-7777; our website is www.IGT.com.
Through the Investor Relations link on our website, we make available free of charge, as soon as reasonably practical after such information has been filed or furnished to the SEC, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act. Our corporate governance guidelines and charters of our Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees are also available on our website. This information will be mailed in print form to any shareholder upon request.
In this document, italicized text with an attached superscript trademark or copyright notation indicates trademarks of IGT or its licensors. For a complete list of trademark and copyright ownership information, please visit our website.
1
BUSINESS SEGMENTS
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, we finalized changes to our organizational structure and management responsibilities to cover all products in distinct geographical areas. This reorganization included an evolving realignment of our sales organization, which began with the appointment of our new CEO in October 2003. The new structure shifted our focus to managing the business by customer regions encompassing all sources and types of revenues. Operating results reviewed by our chief decision makers encompass all sources of revenues within specific regions.
We currently view our business in two operating segments, each incorporating all relevant sources of revenues from product sales and gaming operations.
ª | The North America Division encompasses our operations in the US and Canada, including the IGT Systems group. The North America Division comprised 86% of consolidated revenues in fiscal 2004 and 2002, versus 89% of consolidated revenues in fiscal 2003. | |||
ª | The International Division oversees our efforts abroad in Australia, New Zealand, Europe, Latin America, South Africa, the UK and Japan. The International Division contributed 14% of consolidated revenues in fiscal 2004 and 2002, versus 11% of total revenues in fiscal 2003. |
Our business segments are designed to allocate resources within a framework of management responsibility. Operating costs from one segment may benefit the other segments. We continually evaluate the alignment of our business development and sales organizations for reporting purposes, which may result in changes to segment allocations. Prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current management view and presentation.
The Corporate Division manages certain unallocated income and expenses related to company-wide initiatives, including capital deployment, treasury and cash management, as well as administrative and oversight functions, such as human resources, information systems, and legal. The Corporate Division includes all debt related costs, including interest and losses on early retirements, as well as interest income and gains or losses on investment securities, hedging instruments and other corporate assets. See Note 18 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for revenues and financial results of our business segments.
SOURCES OF REVENUES
We derive revenue from our products in two ways: product sales and gaming operations.
Product Sales
Product sales revenues are generated from the sale of gaming machines, systems, parts, conversion kits, licenses and royalties, equipment and services. Product sales comprised 53% of consolidated revenues in fiscal 2004, 50% in fiscal 2003 and 48% of consolidated revenues and earnings from unconsolidated affiliates in fiscal 2002.
In North America, we manufacture a broad range of gaming machines, consisting of traditional spinning reel slot machines, video gaming machines, government sponsored terminals and other video gaming devices. Internationally, we target the casino style, private club, gaming hall, government sponsored video gaming machine, Amusement with Prize (AWP), and pachisuro or low payout markets. We sell hundreds of recognized game themes to customers, directly or through distributors, and provide equipment contract financing to qualified customers. We also provide financing loans to select customers for the development of new or expanding gaming facilities.
In the North American gaming market, IGT holds an estimated 68% share of the total market base of installed gaming machines. We believe our market share is the result of our commitment to innovation, game design, and technological advances in our games and systems; our extensive patent and theme library; our manufacturing capacity; and the combined efforts of our compliance, sales and customer service teams enabling us to have a presence in all major North America gaming jurisdictions.
During fiscal 2004, our top selling machines included Hexbreaker®, Money Storm®, Kenny Rogers®, Cops and Donuts®, Lucky Larrys Lobstermania®, Enchanted Unicorn®, Triple Double Stars, Triple Double Wild Cherry, Big Times Pay®, Five Star and Triple Stars®. New introductions we are planning for 2005 include Sneeki Tiki, Space for Rent, Shake Your Booty, Max Action, and Stinkin Rich.
2
In addition to gaming machines, we offer a variety of gaming systems products to our customers in relevant gaming markets. Our systems product offerings branded under Advantage Systems include Casino, Video Lottery, Class II (Electronic Bingo), Central Determination and Game Server. These systems products and services enhance the players gaming experience and provide operational efficiencies for our customers. The acquisition of Acres complemented and strengthened our current suite of gaming systems products by providing casino-wide, integrated applications that offer bonusing, slot monitoring, patron management, cage, credit and table games management, visual analysis and cashless wagering modules. These modules can be purchased and installed individually or as an integrated system. The combination of Acres and IGT gaming systems improved our leadership position in systems products, with over 50% of North American casino gaming machines now attached to an IGT system.
The following table presents our gaming products sold as a percentage of consolidated product sales revenues for the last three fiscal years. Other gaming products includes equipment, license fees, service and other miscellaneous revenues.
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||||
Video & Spinning Reel |
71 | % | 74 | % | 72 | % | ||||||
AWP & Low Payout |
10 | % | 9 | % | 11 | % | ||||||
Parts & Conversions |
9 | % | 10 | % | 11 | % | ||||||
Gaming Systems |
9 | % | 6 | % | 5 | % | ||||||
Other Gaming Products |
1 | % | 1 | % | 1 | % |
Gaming Operations
Gaming operations revenues are generated from our installed base of recurring revenue games. These revenues are of a recurring nature based on the use of our gaming machines and equipment distributed under participation agreements. This revenue stream comprised 47% of our consolidated revenues in fiscal 2004, 50% in fiscal 2003, and 52% of consolidated revenues and earnings from unconsolidated affiliates in fiscal 2002. The North America Division provides approximately 98% of our consolidated gaming operations revenues.
We distribute our recurring revenue games under a variety of pricing arrangements including:
ª | wide area progressive (WAP) systems | |||
ª | stand alone participation and flat fee | |||
ª | equipment leasing and rental |
WAP games differ from stand alone games in that they are electronically linked, inter-casino systems that connect gaming machines to a central computer, allowing the system to build a progressive jackpot with every wager until a player hits the top award winning combination. The operation of linked progressive systems varies among jurisdictions as a result of different gaming regulations. Participating casinos pay a percentage of the coin-in either directly to IGT or a trust to oversee and fund the progressive jackpot. Funding of the jackpots also differs by jurisdiction but is generally administered by IGT. Central determination pricing differs from the traditional casino market in that it is weighted toward participation and revenue sharing models.
Growth in gaming operations revenue and gross margin are influenced by a number of factors, such as the number of machines placed, the geographic mix or the pricing arrangements. Gaming operations expenses include the cost of funding jackpot payments to winners, which is subject to interest rate volatility. We began to consolidate the revenues and expenses from our progressive trusts in Iowa and New Jersey due to a change in accounting rules for variable interest entities (VIEs) beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2004. Although the VIE consolidations had no material impact to gross profit or net income, our quarterly gaming operations gross margin was reduced by approximately 200 basis points.
We continually add new innovation and enhanced player appeal into our proprietary games. This is accomplished through the introduction of feature rich games with second event bonusing and by incorporating popular themes such as Wheel of Fortune®, Megabucks®, The Price is Right and The $1,000,000 Pyramid. New themed product introductions we are planning for fiscal year 2005 include Star Wars, Laverne and Shirley, Drew Carey, Elizabeth Taylor, Mickey Mantle, and Gilligans Island. We also plan to introduce the Fort Knox® line of penny products that include a new mystery progressive feature and player-interactive bonuses.
We recognize that all games, including our proprietary games, have a finite lifecycle. IGT systematically replaces games experiencing declining play levels with new games and extensions of existing brands.
3
We distribute proprietary games in 26 North American jurisdictions and select international locations including Australia, Europe, Iceland, Latin America and South Africa. We hold an estimated 63% share of the total proprietary games installed in North America. IGT owned games are reflected in our balance sheet as part of property, plant and equipment. Casino owned games are primarily comprised of machines sold with a related recurring royalty fee.
September 30, |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
Recurring Revenue Games |
||||||||||||
IGT owned units |
||||||||||||
Casinos |
30,300 | 29,400 | 28,600 | |||||||||
Racinos |
6,900 | 4,600 | 3,500 | |||||||||
Proprietary installed base |
37,200 | 34,000 | 32,100 | |||||||||
Casino owned units |
18,000 | 18,800 | 19,500 | |||||||||
Grand total |
55,200 | 52,800 | 51,600 | |||||||||
PRODUCT DEMAND
Demand for our products is driven by a number of factors:
ª | The replacement of older or obsolete machines due to technological innovations: |
The replacement cycle in all gaming jurisdictions represents a significant portion of sales in any given year. It is driven primarily by competition in each market to provide players with more entertaining and sophisticated games. As new machines are installed, the earnings disparity and casino operators efficiencies between the older and newer units on casino floors widens and the replacement cycle is further stimulated. We expect the introduction of new, more sophisticated interactive games and systems combined with the cost savings, convenience, and other benefits of our advanced platform to continue to stimulate demand for replacement machines. The willingness and ability of operators to invest in new or additional machines is also a factor. |
ª | Casino expansion or the addition of new casinos within current gaming markets: |
The construction of new casino properties generates product demand in two ways: machines for the new casinos and replacement machines at established casinos. Neighboring casinos tend to upgrade their gaming machines regularly in order to remain competitive. |
ª | The establishment of new gaming jurisdictions: |
Over the past decade, significant increases in the installed base of gaming machines were driven by the growth in the number of jurisdictions with legalized gaming and the increasing popularity of large theme-based casinos. We believe that our manufacturing capabilities along with our innovative products provide a competitive advantage in providing new casinos with large numbers of machines. |
ª | Player appeal, price, service, reliability, operational efficiencies, technical capability, financial condition and reputation of the manufacturer: |
Entertainment value to the player is the most important feature of our products. Machine design, hardware, software, game features and ease of play also contribute to the earnings power of our gaming machines. All of these features are designed to collectively improve our customers return on investment. |
4
STRATEGIC ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES
As part of our ongoing efforts to create shareholder value, we complement our internal resources through strategic acquisitions of businesses that:
ª | offer opportunities to diversify our geographic reach | |||
ª | expand our product lines and customer base | |||
ª | leverage our technological and manufacturing infrastructure to increase our rates of return |
Following the summary table of our significant acquisitions below is a brief overview of our two most recent acquisitions. The acquisition cost noted in the table represents the purchase price including debt assumed.
Acquisition | ||||||||
Company |
Date Acquired |
Cost |
||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
Acres Gaming Inc. |
October 2003 | $ | 134.0 | |||||
Anchor Gaming |
December 2001 | 1,323.9 | ||||||
Silicon Gaming, Inc. |
March 2001 | 47.4 | ||||||
Sodak Gaming, Inc. |
September 1999 | 198.9 | ||||||
Barcrest Limited |
March 1998 | 72.9 | ||||||
Olympic Amusement Pty. Limited |
March 1998 | 108.9 |
Acres
On October 27, 2003, we acquired Acres, a systems software development company serving the gaming industry worldwide.
Acres provides bonusing and cashless gaming products, as well as a full suite of integrated casino management systems through its Acres Bonusing, Acres Cashless and Acres Advantage product lines. Its patented technology enables casino operators to increase patron loyalty by differentiating the casino property in an increasingly competitive environment.
This business combination provides us the ability to:
ª | utilize the Acres gaming systems technology to develop more integrated gaming systems products | |||
ª | increase our competitive marketing capability | |||
ª | position IGT as a leading global provider of casino gaming systems |
We completed the integration of IGT Systems and Acres in fiscal 2004, including the development efforts, sales, service and operational organizations.
Anchor
On December 30, 2001, we completed the acquisition of Anchor Gaming (Anchor), our partner in the Spin For Cash Joint Venture (JV) since 1996. Since the acquisition, we focused our efforts on the successful integration of the two entities by combining our complementary resources to develop new games more effectively for the benefit of our customers. We assimilated the personnel and physical resources of the two companies to improve our mix of game design, productivity and customer service.
Divestitures
We determined that certain operations acquired with Anchor were not a strategic fit with our core business and committed to a divestiture plan. These operations were reclassified as discontinued operations for all periods presented. We ceased depreciation and amortization for discontinued operations upon committing to the divestiture plan.
ª | In February 2003, we sold the assets of the Anchor Coin Nevada slot route operations for a cash price of $60.5 million. In April 2003, we sold the two Colorado casinos for total cash proceeds of $82.3 million. Collectively, we recognized a gain of $184,000 on these divestitures in fiscal 2003. | |||
ª | In September 2003, we sold the pari-mutuel wagering business, United Tote (UT), for a cash price of $12.3 million and recorded a loss on sale of $8.9 million, net of tax. | |||
ª | In November 2003, we sold IGT OnLine Entertainment Systems, Inc. and the lottery systems business of VLC, Inc., collectively referred to as OnLine Entertainment Systems (OES) for cash proceeds of $151.5 million resulting in a gain of $56.8 million, net of tax. |
5
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
IGTs standing as a leader in the global gaming market is built largely on our ability to develop and design platforms and related games that people find entertaining and want to play. This development strategy combined with our innovative systems improves casino operations and profitability. One of our major development achievements in fiscal 2004 was the adaptation of our current platform and systems technologies, allowing us to participate in multiple new markets such as Alabama, New York, Florida and Oklahoma.
Our emphasis and investment in research and development (R&D) has allowed us to maintain our leadership position in the industry. We have six design centers located worldwide, in addition to our primary development team located in Nevada. These strategically located centers provide us with a local presence and access to our customers, allowing us to respond to market needs and preferences in a timely manner. Over 1,100 employees worldwide are dedicated to product development in various disciplines from hardware, software and firmware engineering to game design, video, multimedia, graphics and sound. Our investment in R&D totaled $129.3 million during fiscal 2004, $94.9 million in fiscal 2003 and $77.9 million in fiscal 2002.
Our business can be explained as the creation of game content and the delivery of these games to the consumer via platforms and systems. We are a prominent designer of games, platforms and systems in the gaming industry. We accomplish this by anticipating client needs, responding to feedback and marketing trends, and pioneering innovative gaming machines and reliable systems solutions. Our technology timeline demonstrates these development efforts.
Our product development process is not complete until our compliance teams ensure that each game, product or system meets all of the requirements in each jurisdiction, North American or international. We conduct business in over 275 jurisdictions worldwide with approximately 100 people employed in the areas of regulatory and product compliance. During fiscal 2004, we presented over 28,000 product submissions worldwide.
Games
We combine the elements of art, math, sound, play mechanics and technological advancements with our entertainment license library and patented intellectual property to provide gaming machines with a high degree of player appeal. Our continued commitment to the development of industry leading games helps maintain our market share and profitability.
In fiscal 2004 North American markets, we introduced 125 new game themes addressing the spinning reel, video and video poker markets. All new games are subject to regulatory approval across the jurisdictions we service. Using our Wide Area Marketing (WAM) computerized testing and monitoring system, we evaluate and forecast acceptance of new products in order to quickly identify the more popular gaming concepts. The WAM test uses a central computer to monitor the performance of games placed in a representative sample of casinos throughout Nevada. There are approximately 15 test locations in various Northern and Southern Nevada casinos. The WAM test program allows us to test games in a relatively short time span, resulting in a quicker release of higher performing games.
6
In international markets, our strategy is to respond to developing markets with local presence, customized games, new product introductions and local production where feasible or required. In Australia, two separate design teams create innovative games for the club and casino markets. In Japan, our engineering and game development department continues to create new games for the pachisuro market. Our new manufacturing agreement with Sammy Corporation in Japan will allow us to work with their design team, as we incorporate their platform in our machines. Barcrest, our UK subsidiary, designs games for the UK and European AWP markets. Leveraging off their success in the AWP markets, we established a Barcrest USA design team to develop games that include interactive top boxes for the North American casino markets. At the same time, the proposed changes in UK gaming legislation will allow Barcrest to launch its own casino product into this market. This effort provides an alternative source of innovation for both the market and IGT.
Platforms
Platforms are one method to deliver our games and game content to the consumer and we support several in order to maximize this distribution. As gaming laws evolve and allow for new solutions to be implemented, we continue in our effort to serve new market opportunities through the strength and flexibility of our distinct platforms.
Our Reel Touch platform incorporates a PC based computer system with a liquid crystal display and corresponding touch screen for player interactivity and game bonusing. In conjunction with this platform we introduced our EZ Touch touchpad, allowing players to change the games denomination at the touch of a button. The Video Reel Touch platform has become the cornerstone of our Class II markets as we internally develop central determination games, related systems and terminals. The adaptation of this platform allowed us to quickly provide solutions in order to expand into new markets, including Alabama charitable gaming and Native American Class II markets.
Our Advanced Video Platform (AVP) will support our next generation of further enhanced video games. This system provides improved graphic capabilities such as full screen live streaming videos and animations with vivid colors along with an enhanced stereo sound system. AVP also greatly expands storage capacity allowing for complex bonusing features. AVP continued its evolution over the past year to bring state of the art processing power to our game design efforts.
Our Intel-based 80960 platform development includes: the Game King® video platform, which offers a single or multi-game format with a touch screen monitor using interactive video slot games with animated graphics and secondary bonusing features; and the S2000 spinning reel platform which combines one of the broadest game libraries with upgraded processor boards and an enhanced sound package. Multi-line, multi-coin video based games are currently among the most popular games on the casino floor. In response to this trend, our products employ advanced technology to enhance entertainment and communication features while retaining many of the familiar and popular features of older games.
During fiscal 2004, we updated processor boards in both the Game King® and S2000 platforms, improving the overall system performance, graphics resolution, and color spectrum. Additionally, we added Ethernet support for high-speed networking, enabling future game downloading. The updated board in the S2000 allows for additional reels.
The VLC 8800 platform continues to hold a significant market share in the government sponsored public gaming or video lottery markets, as governments replace their older equipment. The 8800s can connect to all the major North American video lottery control systems. We are working with our customers as we transition from this 8800 platform to the next generation based on our 80960 Intel platform.
7
Systems
Our recently created IGT Systems group is the result of the integration of IGT Gaming Systems and Acres. Machines and systems are converging, as certain markets require the system and games to be linked in order to satisfy the rules and regulations specific to that jurisdiction. The IGT Systems group allows us to develop integrated gaming systems and adapt our technology to new markets. Branded as IGT Advantage Systems, our product suite includes the following technologies:
IGT Advantage Casino System is a suite of traditional casino management software products providing operators with real-time information in the areas of slot machine performance, patron management, reporting and analysis for table games, along with credit and banking data. This system includes the following functionalities.
ª | EZ Pay Ticketing provides slot machines the capability of accepting tickets, enabling players to move from one machine to another without the inconvenience of handling coins. Casinos have the option to use both coin hoppers and ticket-in machines connected to the EZ Pay system. This technology works with both IGT and competitors slot systems and integrates into casinos existing host systems and internal controls, while meeting the regulatory requirements of each gaming jurisdiction. Our one-wire configuration is referred to as the EZ Pay Integrated Voucher System. This provides our EZ Pay software application with the ability to communicate with IGTs own and other vendors slot systems or the casinos current host systems, using the existing casino floor network. IGT was the first to introduce ticket-in, ticket-out (TITO) systems in casino gaming and continues to lead the industry with over 50% of the TITO systems installed in North America. We have tested and installed our EZ Pay system in many of the largest casino properties and have received regulatory approvals in a majority of North American gaming jurisdictions. | |||
ª | The growing popularity of the low denomination multi-line, multi-coin gaming machines has had a significant impact on the evolution of TITO technology. Because of the volume of coins handled and paid out by these types of games and the associated casino costs, these games are excellent candidates for the TITO technology, such as EZ Pay. All of our new games are available in a Multi-Denomination format that can be readily adapted for use with our EZ Pay system or other TITO systems. | |||
ª | Bonusing technology enables the design and delivery of bonuses and other promotions directly to players at the point and time of play, right at their favorite game. Built on the Microsoft Windows SQL platform, this system provides the instantaneous information needed for management decision-making. Bonusing modules include: Xtra Credit®, PointPlay®, ReturnPlay®, Lucky Coin ®, Personal Progressives®, Celebration Prizes®, and Multiple Jackpot Time. | |||
ª | NexGen Touch Screen Display provides operators the ability to communicate with their customers. It uses the latest in multimedia technology to display player and game activity and promote property events and amenities. | |||
ª | Loyalty Game combines the growing popularity of player clubs with a multi-line, multi-coin game. Players use their club cards in this multi-session game to enable unique bonus rounds. This multi-session functionality provides players with an incentive to return to a specific property or any property across the enterprise. |
IGT Advantage Video Lottery System provides central video gaming control and monitoring systems to government entities. These systems incorporate sophisticated technology and are designed with features intended to appeal to the concerns of the operator. This includes the security of communications, central control of gaming machines on the system, and compatibility with machines made by other manufacturers. Other features include the ability to use a dial-up format, on-demand generation of reports and audits, and the capability of transferring funds electronically. The system provides flexibility to meet the needs of markets of various sizes, accommodate regulatory changes and adapt to new game designs and features.
In addition to these management systems, we create the following systems that can be used to operate games in markets where systems are used to determine game outcomes.
ª | IGT Advantage Class II System provides features that include cross property bingo draws, game software downloads, remote game configuration, full accounting and performance reports, virtual private networks and cashless TITO compatibility. In the very near future, this system will also feature multi-denomination WAPs. | |||
ª | IGT Advantage Central Determination System has many of the same features as our Class II systems and are compliant with the regulations in both the State of Washington and New York. |
8
Intellectual Property, Copyrights, Patents and Trademarks
Our intellectual property rights, patents, trademarks and copyrights are significant assets. We seek to protect our investment in R&D and the unique and distinctive features of our products and services by perfecting and maintaining our intellectual property rights. We obtain patent rights protection covering many of our products and have a significant number of US and foreign patent applications pending. Our portfolio contains approximately 700 active domestic and foreign patents. The subject matter of these patents and patent applications include game designs, bonus and secondary game features, gaming device components, gaming systems, and a variety of other aspects of video and electronic slot machines and associated equipment. We cannot ensure that our intellectual property rights will not be infringed upon or that others will not develop products in violation of our intellectual property rights. Additionally, we cannot be sure that our pending applications for additional intellectual property rights will be granted.
Most of our products are sold under trademarks and copyrights that provide product recognition and promote widespread acceptance. Our products may also contain other content licensed from third parties, such as trademarks, fictional characters, or storylines. We design, manufacture, produce, operate, use, and/or otherwise have permission to exploit certain gaming machines utilizing materials under license from third-party licensors. We seek protection for our copyrights and trademarks in the US and various foreign countries, where applicable.
Our ability to enforce and maintain our patents, copyrights, trademarks and other intellectual property is subject to general litigation risks. When we seek to enforce our rights, we are often presented with various defenses, such as the intellectual property right being asserted is invalid. In addition, our declaration of intellectual property rights often results in the other party seeking to claim alleged intellectual property rights of its own against us.
PRODUCT MARKETS
We market our gaming products to legalized gaming jurisdictions around the world. While our most significant markets are in North America, we continue to pursue additional opportunities in international areas. The opportunities, challenges and our successes, vary across these jurisdictions. A review of the various markets is provided below.
North America
The ever-growing popularity of gaming as a leisure activity continues to influence demand in North America, resulting in expansion of existing markets and legalization in new markets. The introduction of riverboat gaming in the Midwest during the early 1990s, the continuing expansion of Native American casino gaming and the growth in the Canadian and non-casino government sponsored gaming markets continues to expand this market and provide IGT with significant growth opportunities. Most recently, the emerging central determination and Class II markets are spurring new growth. As a result, the installed base of gaming machines increased from an estimated 184,000 machines in 1991 to approximately 802,000 machines in 2004.
Based on internal data and information provided by various gaming agencies, we have compiled the following table of the estimated total gaming machines installed in North America by jurisdiction.
Estimated Installed Base |
||||||||
September 30, |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||
US |
||||||||
Nevada |
205,000 | 210,000 | ||||||
Atlantic City |
42,000 | 42,000 | ||||||
Native American(1) |
224,000 | 196,000 | ||||||
Regional |
165,000 | 160,000 | ||||||
Racinos and Lottery |
83,000 | 72,000 | ||||||
Total US |
719,000 | 680,000 | ||||||
Canada |
||||||||
Casinos |
44,000 | 40,000 | ||||||
Racinos and Lottery |
39,000 | 39,000 | ||||||
Total Canada |
83,000 | 79,000 | ||||||
Total North America |
802,000 | 759,000 | ||||||
(1) Native American installed base now includes Class II and Class III gaming machines.
9
Gaming Expansion
We anticipate further gaming expansion in North America. Pennsylvania passed legislation in fiscal 2004 for gaming machines, a market that could eventually grow to an installed base of over 60,000 machines. Florida voted to change the state constitution to potentially allow for gaming machines in two densely populated counties, subject to local approval and enabling legislation. Oklahoma voters recently approved compacted Class III gaming, where racetracks would be permitted to install approved machines after at least four Oklahoma tribes compacted with the State.
During fiscal 2005, we will continue to monitor legislation as it pertains to gaming in the states of Ohio, Maryland, Massachusetts and Texas. These states are all facing budget deficits in the upcoming year and previously made efforts to legalize machine gaming.
Casino Markets
Nevada
Nevada is the largest and most established gaming market in North America, with approximately 100 casinos and various other smaller gaming venues with an estimated 205,000 gaming machines. The large mega-resort casinos are concentrated on the Las Vegas Strip. Other primary markets include the Las Vegas locals or off-strip market, Laughlin, Reno and Lake Tahoe.
Given its mature nature, Nevada is one of our most competitive markets. Even in this challenging environment, a number of operators have announced plans that will expand the Las Vegas market in the coming years. Wynn Las Vegas will open its new resort in April 2005. Station Casinos Inc. will expand its local presence in 2006 with the Red Rock Station. Additionally, Boyd Gamings South Coast property will make its debut in 2006.
Our fiscal 2004 sales in Nevada increased over fiscal 2003 as a result of replacement demand generated by TITO initiatives with major operators such as Harrahs Entertainment Inc. and Station Casinos Inc.
Atlantic City
The Atlantic City market consists of 13 large casinos concentrated in a mature boardwalk area and marina district. This market includes approximately 42,000 gaming machines. We experienced a strong increase in fiscal 2004 in replacement demand due to TITO initiatives in Atlantic City. Future anticipated Atlantic City developments include an expansion of the Borgata in fiscal 2006.
Native American
We distribute gaming products to authorized Native American casinos through our Sodak distribution facility in Rapid City, South Dakota. Currently, approximately 220 sovereign tribes operate more than over 350 gaming venues in 28 states.
Native American gaming differs from the traditional casino market in that it is regulated under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA), which permits specific types of gaming as follows:
ª | Class I Gaming Traditional Native American social and ceremonial games; regulated exclusively at the tribal level. | |||
ª | Class II Gaming Bingo, pull-tabs, punch board, tip jars, instant bingo and other games similar to bingo; regulated by individual tribes, with the National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC) having oversight of the regulatory process. | |||
ª | Class III Gaming All forms of casino-style gaming not included under Class I and Class II, including traditional slot machines and table games; governed by compacts negotiated between individual tribes and states. |
Pursuant to these regulations, we distribute Class III machines to Native American tribes who negotiated compacts with their states and received federal approval. The estimated Class III Native American market installed base totaled 177,000 machines at the end of fiscal 2004.
We began distributing Class II machines to Native American tribes during the latter half of fiscal 2004. Class II includes the Native American markets in Oklahoma, Florida and various other jurisdictions. The estimated Class II Native American market installed base totaled 47,000 machines at the end of fiscal 2004. We anticipate continued growth from expanding our presence within existing and new gaming facilities planned in both Florida and Oklahoma during fiscal 2005.
10
Regional
Riverboat-style gaming began in Iowa in 1991 and is currently operating in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Mississippi and Missouri. The regional market also includes the land-based casinos in Detroit and Colorado, as well as sales to cruise ships, and in total comprises a market of approximately 165,000 machines. We had strong TITO related replacement sales as operators continue to focus on streamlining and reducing the cost of their operations. Expansion opportunities for the near-term include plans for a new casino for French Lick, Indiana, and anticipated new casinos in Mississippi. Longer-term opportunities may include permanent casinos in Detroit and potential additional licenses granted in Illinois, Iowa and Missouri.
Racinos and Lottery
IGT provides both VLTs and casino-style gaming machines and systems on a for-sale or participation basis to government sponsored jurisdictions. VLTs are machines that usually have limited bet amounts and prize payouts, as controlled by state lottery regulations. In domestic jurisdictions (except Montana), VLTs are connected to a central control system overseen by state regulators, often the state lottery. Many of these machines are located at racetracks or in licensed bars with limits on the number of machines that can be offered in any given location. Currently there are nine US states that have authorized various forms of video lottery gaming, namely Delaware, Louisiana, Montana, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, South Dakota, Rhode Island and West Virginia. In Delaware and Rhode Island, we have long-term arrangements to place games at racetracks.
Growth in this market was driven by the addition of VLTs at racetracks in New York. The State of New York began installing VLTs, under revenue sharing agreements in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 with approximately 1,300 units at Saratoga and 1,000 units at the Finger Lakes facility. The Buffalo facility followed in the third quarter with approximately 1,000 units and Monticello with 1,700 units. We were awarded approximately 24% of the machines. The second phase includes Yonkers, Aqueduct and Batavia venues scheduled over the next 12 to 18 months with an additional 10,600 machines.
This market also includes the central determination charitable bingo market in Alabama. Other states may be evaluating enabling legislation allowing similar charitable electronic video bingo products. These products share many of the characteristics of the Class II machines we ship to the Native American markets previously discussed. We will continue to leverage our efforts in developing central determination systems in order to serve new markets that are open to these forms of gaming.
Canada
The Canadian casino market operates under the auspices of the government controlled lottery corporations and experienced steady growth during the past year. There are over 60 casinos in Canada with an approximate installed base of 44,000 gaming machines.
The public gaming market in Canada consists of approximately 39,000 machines installed within the provinces of Alberta, Manitoba, Quebec and Saskatchewan. The Atlantic Lottery Corporation is the exclusive agent in the provinces of New Brunswick, Newfoundland, Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island. These machines are VLTs similar to those offered in US public gaming markets and are principally located in bars and taverns.
In fiscal 2004, we completed contracts with the Manitoba Lottery Corporation and provided machines for a new casino for the Ontario Lottery Corporation. Other provinces are considering expanding casino-style gaming through new casino facilities located in urban areas, most notably in Vancouver and Edmonton. With the completion of the Manitoba Lottery contract, the current replacement market in Canada is essentially finished.
International
IGTs presence in the international gaming markets began in 1986 and we continue to pursue growth in this area. Our goal is to further leverage our North American markets design and manufacturing experiences, while addressing each international markets unique customer and regulatory environment. We established our International Division headquarters in the Netherlands in 2000, responsible for overseeing all international operations servicing the casino markets in Europe, Latin America, Russia and South Africa, the club markets in Australia and New Zealand, and the AWP and low payout markets in the UK and Japan. Casino and club market gaming machines are fabricated, in whole or kit form, at our Reno facility.
11
The AWP and low payout markets provide lower game economics for all suppliers due to the associated laws and regulations. These unique markets generally require numerous game introductions and short product lifecycles, with lower average sales prices and margins than other international markets. In the UK, we maintain local manufacturing capabilities to serve the AWP market. In Japan, we have a partnership with a third-party manufacturer (Sammy Corporation) to serve the low payout pachisuro market.
Our success in international markets is derived from innovative game design. Our challenges in international markets are the result of addressing each individual gaming jurisdictions regulatory environment. Our management team focuses on communication between North America and international personnel to effectively meet the opportunities and challenges of these markets.
Internationally, the prospects for additional gaming in various jurisdictions continue to improve. Proposals to change regulatory restrictions on gaming are currently being discussed by the UK government. The first Las Vegas style casinos opened in Macau in 2004 and more expansion in this market is anticipated. The gaming market in Russia is also poised for expansion in the upcoming years. Diverse countries such as Singapore, Japan, Mexico, Taiwan, and Thailand are all seeing an increase in popular support for legalizing casinos as a means of increasing tourism. We anticipate our international markets will grow in significance over the next several years and increase their share of overall contribution.
Casino Markets
Europe
In 1992, we opened our office in The Netherlands to service the European, Middle Eastern and North African casino markets. Casinos and slot halls in these markets compete with non-casino environments such as pubs and arcades. We anticipate moderate growth in the European installed based. Our sales to this market will be a mix of new business and replacement sales, the latter being increasingly driven by cashless solutions such as TITO. There is a particular focus to further develop new business in Russia and the Commonwealth of Independent States (former Soviet bloc countries) with plans to open a representative office in Moscow in the near future.
Latin America
We sell and place casino style gaming equipment to many legalized gaming jurisdictions in Latin America, through our offices in Argentina and Florida. The economic environment of this region has become more stable since the devaluation of the Argentine peso in fiscal 2002.
South Africa
Our office in Midrand, Gauteng, South Africa services the gaming markets located in South Africa, Sub-Saharan Africa and the Indian Ocean Islands. Casino gaming in South Africa is governed under their National Gambling Act, allowing for the allocation of 40 casino licenses between each of the nine provinces in South Africa in 1996. We are also pursuing other African opportunities outside of South Africa.
Other International Markets
We have an International Market group in Reno supporting product sales to military bases and other legal gaming markets around the world not directly supported by an international subsidiary.
Club Markets
Australia and New Zealand
Australia is one of the largest and most established markets for video gaming products outside of North America. Our offices in Australia and New Zealand provide sales and customer service to all gaming areas related to the club market. The machines for Australia are manufactured in Reno to a partially completed state. IGT-Australia performs the necessary game development and programming, final test, delivery and installation.
A limit on the number of gaming machines exists in most jurisdictions and significant gaming tax increases have been proposed in the largest jurisdiction of New South Wales, Australia. The Australian and New Zealand state and federal governments have pursued a number of policies aimed at a wide range of harm minimization measures, specifically targeting gaming machines. While not all of the measures have been legislated at this time, the uncertainty created for operators may continue to have an adverse effect on the demand for gaming machines in Australia and New Zealand.
12
AWP and Low Payout Markets
United Kingdom
We established a manufacturing, sales, marketing, distribution, engineering and game development operation in Manchester, England with our acquisition of Barcrest Limited in March 1998. Barcrest manufactures and sells low-payout AWP machines and top box products. An AWP machine is a game for amusement that is limited to low payout cash prizes, typically under $45. Barcrest is a leading UK manufacturer of AWP games, selling to both the UK and continental European markets.
Our success in this market is built around access to three separate design centers that focus on new products in the UK, along with a design center in The Netherlands that provides game design for other European markets. Barcrests markets are primarily replacement driven, dominated by pubs and licensed betting offices that demand regular releases of new machines. The installed base of AWP machines is approximately 250,000 units. To meet this demand, new products are launched in the UK every four to six weeks.
Proposed changes to modernize the 1968 Gaming Act in the UK may provide increased opportunities for IGT. The most significant proposed change, if made, would allow for an increase in the number of casinos and the number of machines in casinos. In order to prepare for this opportunity, we established a separate IGT-UK Casino group with offices in the Midlands region. In addition, Barcrest has recently increased the size of its manufacturing and distribution facility, with the acquisition of new land, to support additional capacity should the UK gaming legislation come into force. The UK government is presently discussing the potential measures and legislation could be proposed during 2005.
Japan
We established an office in 1990 that serves the Japanese market with engineering, development, sales, and administration from our head office in Tokyo and a logistics office in Nagano. During fiscal 2004, we entered into a manufacturing agreement with Sammy Corporation. We expect this agreement will help position our company to be a more competitive and consistent performer in the Japanese pachisuro marketplace. The installed base of pachisuro machines is estimated at over 1.6 million units. The short product lifecycle of these machines causes them to turn over approximately every two years on average.
COMPETITION
The market for gaming machines and systems is intensely competitive. The principal method of competition is product development. We believe our diverse library of strong performing games and intellectual property is a competitive advantage. Other ways we remain competitive include the quality and breadth of our sales and service organizations, our financial strength, as a manufacturer, and pricing.
US and foreign manufacturers that compete with IGT in gaming markets include, but are not limited to: Ainsworth Gaming Technology; Aristocrat Leisure Limited (Aristocrat); Bally Gaming Inc., a subsidiary of Alliance Gaming Corp. (Alliance); Gauselmann Group (Atronics); Aruze, (formerly known as Universal); Cirsa Group; Franco Gaming, Ltd., a division of Recreativos Franco; Konami Co. Ltd. (Konami); Novomatic Industries; Mikohn; Sierra Design Group, acquired by Alliance; Spielo, acquired by GTECH; Stargames; Universal Distributing, Inc.; WMS Industries (WMS); Multimedia Gaming Inc. (MGAM); and Rocket Gaming Systems. All have developed casino products and are either authorized to sell products or are in the licensing process in many US and foreign gaming jurisdictions.
We provide substantial marketing and advertising support for our gaming products and compete on the basis of our extensive infrastructure, popular brand names, product appeal, jackpot awards, player loyalty, technical expertise and marketing experience.
OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW
Manufacturing and Suppliers
We manufacture gaming machines in the US, the UK and through manufacturing relationships with third parties in Canada and Japan. The manufacturing operations primarily involve the assembly of electronic components, cables, harnesses, video monitors and prefabricated parts purchased from outside sources. We also operate a cabinet manufacturing and silkscreen facility in the US. We have a broad base of material suppliers and utilize multi-sourcing practices to ensure component availability.
During fiscal 2004, our domestic operations received ISO 9001.2000 certification covering manufacturing, engineering, systems development, game development and customer service. Our Reno facility has 736,000 square feet devoted to manufacturing, warehousing, shipping and receiving. During fiscal 2004, we began major construction projects in Reno and Las Vegas. The Reno project includes additional office space and a new data center that will be ready for occupancy in early 2005. In Las Vegas we are developing a central campus to consolidate various leased facilities, estimated for completion in 2007.
13
We generally carry a significant amount of inventory due to the broad range of products we manufacture and to facilitate our capacity to fill customer orders on a timely basis. Our product sales backlog orders totaled approximately $328.6 million at October 31, 2004 and $430.7 million at October 31, 2003. Our backlog orders for proprietary games totaled approximately 5,400 units at October 31, 2004 and 10,400 units at October 31, 2003. We reasonably expect to fill our backlog within fiscal 2005.
Sales and Distribution
Our products and services are sold to gaming operators and governmental entities that conduct gaming operations. We market our products and proprietary systems through our internal sales staff, agents and distributors. We employ approximately 300 sales personnel in various North America and international locations.
IGT uses distributors for sales to specific markets including Canada, the Caribbean, France, Germany, Japan, South Korea, Louisiana, New Jersey, New Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Spain and The Netherlands. IGTs agreements with distributors do not specify minimum purchases but generally provide that IGT may terminate the distribution agreement if certain performance standards have not been satisfied.
Customer Service
We consider customer service an important aspect of our overall marketing strategy and a key factor differentiating us from our competitors. Customers are provided product delivery and installation services, warranty services, after-market technical services and new product support services. Equipment spare parts, product retrofit and game conversion services are also provided. We typically provide a 90-day service and parts warranty program in North America and up to a 180-day warranty service internationally for our gaming machines. We employ more than 900 trained customer service personnel in 30 customer service support centers in all major North American gaming jurisdictions and internationally in Argentina, Australia, Japan, New Zealand, South Africa, The Netherlands and the UK.
We also provide extensive customer education and service through customer product and employee training, technical employee certification programs, videotaped instruction, a 24-hour customer service hotline, newsletters, our website (www.IGT.com), and the Global Support Center (GSC). The GSC is a fully staffed facility providing 24-hour telephone support to all types of casino system customers. The GSC has access to a range of field support engineering resources to resolve technical issues. Through these extensive resources, IGT provides a direct link for two-way communication between the customer and IGT and access to product information 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
Regulatory Compliance
Our product and regulatory compliance efforts are designed to ensure that each gaming product or system we develop meets the requirements set forth in all gaming jurisdictions worldwide. These efforts also ensure we obtain the necessary approvals and licenses. Through our efforts we are able to successfully sell and market our products worldwide, and provide our customers with the assurance that our products work properly and meet jurisdictional requirements. We hold over 390 gaming licenses worldwide.
Information Systems
In fiscal 2004, we expanded our Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) solution to support Native American operations and are in the process of implementing this technology in our new IGT Systems group. The Project Systems module was successfully implemented within our Engineering departments to track project resources, timelines and costs.
EMPLOYEES
As of September 30, 2004, we have approximately 4,900 total employees, including approximately 4,100 in North American operations and 800 internationally. We believe we have favorable relationships with our employees.
RESPONSIBLE GAMING
We continue to be an industry leader in addressing and attempting to minimize problem gambling. We partner with other companies in the gaming industry to raise awareness of problem gaming, and work to educate the public and our employees about its symptoms and consequences. To stress our commitment to raising an awareness of this problem, we dedicate internal resources to coordinate with the industry and its trade groups to organize awareness events, distribute educational materials and organize contributions for the research of problem gaming. In virtually every casino in the US and Canada, there are posted advisories and telephone numbers for patrons to call if they or someone they know needs help, as well as literature for patrons to read about problem gaming.
14
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
General
We operate in most legal casino gaming jurisdictions worldwide, as well as in a significant number of legalized lottery jurisdictions. The manufacture and distribution of gaming equipment and related software and the operation of casinos is subject to regulation in these jurisdictions by various regulators at all levels from city and tribal officials along with federal regulatory agencies, with the majority of oversight being provided by each individual states gaming regulators. While the regulatory requirements vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, the majority of these jurisdictions require licenses, permits, findings of suitability, documentation of qualification including evidence of financial stability and/or other required approvals for companies who manufacture and distribute gaming equipment, as well as the individual suitability of officers, directors, major stockholders and key employees.
Various gaming regulatory agencies have issued licenses allowing us to manufacture and distribute our gaming machines and systems. IGT and our key personnel have obtained or applied for all government licenses, permits, registrations, findings of suitability and approvals necessary to maintain compliance with all regulatory agency requirements. Many of the regulations at each level are similar or overlapping; however, we are required to satisfy all conditions individually for each jurisdiction. Laws of the various gaming regulatory agencies serve to protect the public and ensure that gaming related activity is conducted honestly, competitively, and free of corruption. In the jurisdictions where we operate casinos or gaming machines, the oversight additionally ensures that the local authorities receive the appropriate amount of tax revenues. As such, our operations financial systems and reporting functions must demonstrate high levels of detail and integrity.
In some jurisdictions, regulators not only govern the activities that take place in their particular jurisdiction, but they also oversee activities that occur in other jurisdictions to ensure that the company is in compliance with local standards on a worldwide basis. As a Nevada corporation, we are held responsible by our state regulatory authorities to maintain Nevada standards for all of our operations worldwide. For this reason, in a number of jurisdictions we employ localized staff members and legal resources with local knowledge to assist in keeping us in compliance with local regulatory laws. The local staff communicates regularly with our corporate headquarters Compliance department to ensure that none of our licenses in any jurisdiction are put in jeopardy.
The nature of the industry and our worldwide operations make this process very time consuming and requires extensive resources. The process helps assure both regulators and investors that all of our operations maintain the highest levels of integrity and avoid any appearances of improprieties. We have never been denied a gaming related license, nor have our licenses ever been suspended or revoked.
Nevada Regulation
The manufacture, sale and distribution of gaming devices in Nevada or for use outside Nevada are subject to extensive state and local laws, regulations and ordinances of the Nevada Gaming Commission (Commission), the State Gaming Control Board (GCB), and various county and municipal regulatory authorities (collectively referred to as the Nevada gaming authorities). These laws, regulations and ordinances primarily cover the responsibility, financial stability and character of gaming equipment manufacturers, distributors and operators, as well as persons financially interested or involved in gaming operations. The manufacture, distribution and operation of gaming devices require separate licenses. The laws, regulations and supervisory procedures of the Nevada gaming authorities seek to (i) prevent unsavory or unsuitable persons from having a direct or indirect involvement with gaming at any time or in any capacity, (ii) establish and maintain responsible accounting practices and procedures, (iii) maintain effective control over the financial practices of licensees, including establishing minimum procedures for internal fiscal affairs and the safeguarding of assets and revenues, providing reliable record keeping and requiring the filing of periodic reports with the Nevada gaming authorities, (iv) prevent cheating and fraudulent practices, and (v) provide a source of state and local revenues through taxation and licensing fees. Changes in these laws, regulations, procedures, and judicial or regulatory interpretations could have an adverse effect on our gaming operations.
Our subsidiaries that conduct the manufacture, sale, and distribution of gaming devices in Nevada or for use outside Nevada, as well as the operation of slot machine routes and other gaming activities in Nevada, are each required to be licensed by the Nevada gaming authorities. Our licenses must be renewed periodically and the Nevada gaming authorities have broad discretion with regard to such renewals. Licenses are not transferable. Each type of machine we sell in Nevada must first be approved by the Commission and may require subsequent machine modification. Our gaming subsidiaries licensed in Nevada must also report substantially all loans, leases, and sales of securities and similar financing transactions of a material nature to the GCB and/or have them approved by the Commission. We believe we have obtained all required licenses and/or approvals necessary to carry on our business in Nevada.
15
The Company is registered with the Commission as a publicly traded corporation and is required periodically to submit detailed financial and operating reports to the Commission and to furnish any other information that the Commission may require. No person may become a stockholder of or receive any percentage of profits from our licensed gaming subsidiaries, without first obtaining licenses and approvals from the Nevada gaming authorities.
Our officers, directors and key employees who are actively engaged in the administration or supervision of gaming and/or directly involved in gaming activities of our licensed gaming subsidiaries may be required to file applications with the Nevada gaming authorities and may be required to be licensed or found suitable by them. Officers, directors, and certain key employees of our licensed gaming subsidiaries must file applications with the Nevada gaming authorities and may be required by them to be licensed or found suitable.
In addition, anyone having a material relationship or involvement with us or any of our licensed gaming subsidiaries may be required to be found suitable or licensed and to pay to the GCB all of its investigation costs and fees. The Commission may deny an application for licensure or finding of suitability for any cause deemed reasonable. A finding of suitability is comparable to licensing and both require submission of detailed personal and financial information followed by a thorough background investigation. We must report changes in licensed positions to the Commission. The Commission may disapprove any change in position by one of our officers, directors, or key employees, or require us to suspend or dismiss officers, directors or other key employees and sever relationships with other persons who refuse to file appropriate applications or whom the Nevada gaming authorities find unsuitable to act in such capacities. Determinations of suitability or of questions pertaining to licensing are not subject to judicial review in Nevada.
We are required to submit detailed financial and operating reports to the Commission. If the Commission determines that we are in violation of any gaming laws, our gaming licenses can be limited, conditioned, suspended or revoked. In addition, the Company, our licensed gaming subsidiaries and any persons involved may be subject to substantial fines for each separate violation of the gaming laws at the discretion of the Commission. The Commission also has the power to appoint a supervisor to operate our gaming properties and, under certain circumstances, earnings generated during the supervisors appointment could be forfeited to the State of Nevada. The limitation, conditioning or suspension of our gaming licenses or the appointment of a supervisor could (and revocation of our gaming licenses would) materially and adversely affect our gaming operations.
The Commission may require any beneficial holder of our voting securities, regardless of the number of shares owned, to file an application, be investigated, and be found suitable, in which case the applicant would be required to pay the costs and fees of the GCB investigation. If the beneficial holder of voting securities who must be found suitable is a corporation, partnership, or trust, must submit detailed business and financial information including a list of beneficial owners. Any person who acquires more than 5% of the Companys voting securities must report this to the Commission. Any person who becomes a beneficial owner of more than 10% of our voting securities must apply for a finding of suitability within 30 days after the Chairman of the GCB mails the written notice requiring this finding of suitability.
Under certain circumstances, an institutional investor, as this term is defined in the Nevada gaming regulations, acquiring more than 10% but not more than 15% of our voting securities, may apply to the Commission for a waiver of these finding of suitability requirements, provided the institutional investor holds the voting securities for investment purposes only. An institutional investor will not be deemed to hold voting securities for investment purposes unless the voting securities were acquired and are held in the ordinary course of its business. Our voting securities must not be acquired for the purpose of causing, directly or indirectly (i) the election of a majority of our board of directors, (ii) any change in our corporate charter, bylaws, management, policies or operations, or (iii) any other action the Commission finds to be inconsistent with holding our voting securities for investment purposes only. The Commission considers voting on all matters voted on by stockholders and the making of financial and other informational inquiries of the type normally made by securities analysts, to be consistent with investment intent.
The Commission has the power to investigate any person who holds our debt or equity securities. The Clark County Liquor and Gaming Licensing Board, with jurisdiction over gaming in the Las Vegas area, may similarly require a finding of suitability of a security holder. The applicant stockholder is required to pay all costs of such investigation. Our bylaws provide for us to pay these costs that are related to our officers, directors or employees.
16
Any person who fails or refuses to apply for a finding of suitability or a license within 30 days after being ordered to do so by the Commission or the Chairman of the GCB may be found unsuitable. The same restrictions apply to a record owner who fails to identify the beneficial owner, if requested to do so. Any stockholder found unsuitable and who holds, directly or indirectly, any beneficial ownership of our common stock beyond such period of time as may be prescribed by the Commission may be guilty of a criminal offense. We are subject to disciplinary action and possible loss of our approvals if, after we receive notice that a person is unsuitable to be a stockholder or to have any other relationship with us or any of our licensed gaming subsidiaries, we (i) pay that person any dividend or interest upon our voting securities, (ii) allow that person to exercise, directly or indirectly, any voting right conferred through securities held by that person, (iii) give remuneration in any form to that person, for services rendered or otherwise, or (iv) fail to pursue all lawful efforts to require such unsuitable person to relinquish his voting securities for cash at fair market value. Additionally, the Clark County authorities have taken the position that they have the authority to approve all persons owning or controlling the stock of any corporation controlling a gaming licensee.
The Commission may, in its discretion, require the holder of our debt securities to file an application, be investigated and be found suitable to own any of our debt securities. If the Commission determines that a person is unsuitable to own any of these securities, then pursuant to the Nevada gaming laws, we can be sanctioned, including the loss of our approvals, if without prior Commission approval, we: (i) pay to the unsuitable person any dividend, interest, or any distribution whatsoever; (ii) recognize any voting right by such unsuitable person in connection with such securities; (iii) pay the unsuitable person remuneration in any form; or (iv) make any payment to the unsuitable person by way of principal, redemption, conversion, exchange, liquidation, or similar transaction.
We are required to maintain a current stock ledger in Nevada, subject to examination by the Commission at any time. If any of our securities are held in trust by an agent or by a nominee, the record holder may be required to disclose the identity of the beneficial owner to the Commission. A failure to make such disclosure may be grounds for finding the record holder unsuitable. We are also required to render maximum assistance in determining the identity of the beneficial owner. The Commission has the power at any time to require our stock certificates to bear a legend indicating that the securities are subject to the Nevada gaming laws and the regulations of the Commission. To date, the Commission has not imposed this requirement on us.
We may not make a public offering of our securities without the prior approval of the Commission if the securities or their proceeds are intended to be used to construct, acquire or finance gaming facilities in Nevada, or retire or extend obligations incurred for such purposes. Such approval, if given, does not constitute a finding, recommendation, or approval by the Commission or the GCB as to the accuracy or adequacy of the prospectus or the investment merits of the securities. Any representation to the contrary is unlawful.
In July 2003, the Commission granted us prior approval to make public offerings for a period of two years, subject to certain conditions (referred to as a shelf approval). The chairman of the GCB may rescind the shelf approval for good cause without prior notice upon the issuance of an interlocutory stop order. The shelf approval does not constitute a finding, recommendation, or approval by the Commission or the GCB as to the accuracy or adequacy of the prospectus or the investment merits of the securities offered. Any representation to the contrary is unlawful.
Changes in control of the Company through merger, consolidation, acquisition of assets or stock, management or consulting agreements or any form of takeover cannot occur without the prior investigation of the GCB and approval of the Commission. Entities seeking to acquire control of us must satisfy the GCB and the Commission in a variety of stringent standards prior to assuming control. The Commission may also require controlling stockholders, officers, directors and other persons having a material relationship or involvement with the entity proposing to acquire control, to be investigated and licensed as part of the approval process relating to the transaction.
The Nevada legislature has declared that some corporate acquisitions opposed by management, repurchases of voting securities and other corporate defense tactics that affect Nevada gaming licensees, and publicly traded corporations that are affiliated with those operations, may be injurious to stable and productive corporate gaming. The Commission has established a regulatory scheme to guard against the potentially adverse effects of these business practices upon Nevadas gaming industry and to further Nevadas policy to (i) assure the financial stability of corporate gaming operators and their affiliates; (ii) preserve the beneficial aspects of conducting business in the corporate form; and (iii) promote a neutral environment for the orderly governance of corporate affairs. Approvals are, in certain circumstances, required from the Commission before we can make exceptional repurchases of voting securities above their current market price and before a corporate acquisition opposed by management can be consummated. Nevadas gaming laws and regulations also require prior approval by the Commission if we were to adopt a plan of recapitalization proposed by our board of directors in opposition to a tender offer made directly to our stockholders for the purpose of acquiring control of us.
17
License fees and taxes are imposed by the Nevada gaming authorities and are either payable quarterly or annually. The fees and taxes are computed in various ways depending on the type of activity involved by our subsidiaries and the cities and counties where our subsidiaries conduct operations. Annual fees are payable to the GCB to renew our licenses as a manufacturer, distributor, and operator of a slot machine route. Nevada law also requires persons providing gaming machines in Nevada to casino customers on a revenue participation basis to pay their proportionate share of the taxes imposed on gaming revenues generated by the participation gaming machines.
Any person who is licensed, required to be licensed, registered, required to be registered, or is under common control with such persons (collectively referred to as licensees), and who proposes to participate in the conduct of gaming operations outside of Nevada is required to deposit with the GCB, and thereafter maintain, a revolving fund in the amount of $10,000 to pay the expenses of investigation by the GCB of the licensees participation in foreign gaming. This revolving fund is subject to increase or decrease at the discretion of the Commission. As a licensee, we are required to comply with certain reporting requirements imposed by the Nevada laws. We are also subject to disciplinary action by the Commission if we knowingly violate any laws of the foreign jurisdiction pertaining to our foreign gaming operation, fail to conduct our foreign gaming operations in accordance with the standards of honesty and integrity required of Nevada gaming operations, engage in activities that are harmful to the State of Nevada or its ability to collect gaming taxes and fees, or employ a person in the foreign operation who has been denied a license or finding of suitability in Nevada on the grounds of personal unsuitability.
Federal Registration
The Federal Gambling Devices Act of 1962 (the Act) makes it unlawful for a person to manufacture, transport, or receive gaming machines, gaming devices or components across interstate lines unless that person has first registered with the Attorney General of the US Department of Justice. In addition, gambling device identification and record keeping requirements are imposed by the Act. Violation of the Act may result in seizure and forfeiture of the equipment, as well as other penalties. Subsidiaries of International Game Technology involved in the manufacture and transportation of gaming devices are required to register annually. We have complied with the registration requirements of the Act.
Native American Gaming Regulation
Federal law, tribal-state compacts, and tribal gaming regulations govern gaming on Native American lands. The IGRA provides the framework for federal and state control over all gaming on Native American lands and is administered by the NIGC and the Secretary of the US Department of the Interior. The NIGC has authority to issue regulations governing tribal gaming activities, approve tribal ordinances for regulating gaming, approve management agreements for gaming facilities, conduct investigations and monitor tribal gaming generally. The IGRA is subject to interpretation by the NIGC and may be subject to judicial and legislative clarification or amendment. The IGRA requires that the tribe and the state enter into a written agreement, a tribal-state compact, which governs the terms of the gaming activities. Tribal-state compacts vary from state-to-state and in many cases require equipment manufacturers and/or distributors to meet ongoing registration and licensing requirements. In addition, tribal gaming commissions have been established by many Native American tribes to regulate gaming-related activity on Indian lands. Indian tribes are sovereign in their own government systems, with primary regulatory authority over gaming on land within the tribes jurisdiction. IGT distributes gaming equipment to Native American tribes who have negotiated compacts with their states and have received federal approval.
International Regulation
Certain foreign countries permit the importation, sale and operation of gaming equipment in casino and non-casino environments. Some countries prohibit or restrict the payout feature of the traditional slot machine or limit the operation and the number of slot machines to a controlled number of casinos or casino-like locations. Each gaming machine must comply with the individual countrys regulations. Certain jurisdictions require the licensing of gaming machine operators and manufacturers.
We manufacture and supply gaming equipment to various international markets including Australia, Europe, Japan, Latin America, New Zealand, Africa, and the UK. We have obtained the required licenses to manufacture and distribute our products in the various foreign jurisdictions where we do business.
18
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS AND RISK FACTORS
Risk Factors and Cautionary Statement for Purposes of the Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
Throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K we make some forward looking statements, which do not relate to historical or current facts, but are forward looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements relate to analyses and other information based on forecasts of future results and estimates of amounts not yet determinable. These statements also relate to our future prospects and proposed new products, services, developments or business strategies. These statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as anticipate, believe, could, would, estimate, expect, intend, may, plan, predict, project, pursue, will, continue, feel, or the negative or other variations thereof, and other similar terms and phrases, including references to assumptions, and include but are not limited to the following:
ª | expectations about our ability to introduce new games and systems to stimulate the replacement market | |||
ª | estimates of our market share of the installed base | |||
ª | estimates about the installed base in North America | |||
ª | expectations about gaming expansion in North America and International markets | |||
ª | judgements and assumptions related to our critical accounting estimates | |||
ª | estimates about our interest expense savings | |||
ª | estimates about our tax exposure and tax rates | |||
ª | estimates of expected gross profit margins | |||
ª | estimates that the replacement market will continue at certain paces | |||
ª | expectations that our available capital resources will be sufficient to fund our capital expenditures and operating requirements | |||
ª | dont expect any material losses from off-balance sheet arrangements | |||
ª | dont expect any material foreign exchange rate gain and losses |
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in any of our forward looking statements are reasonable, actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied. Our future financial condition and results of operations, as well as any forward looking statements, are subject to change and to inherent known and unknown risks and uncertainties. We do not intend, and undertake no obligation, to update our forward looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances.
We urge you to carefully review the following discussion of the specific risks and uncertainties that affect our business. These include, but are not limited to, the following:
Our success in the gaming industry depends in large part on our ability to develop innovative products and systems and would be adversely affected by:
ª | a decline in the popularity of our gaming products with players | |||
ª | a lack of success in developing new products | |||
ª | an inability to roll out new games on schedule | |||
ª | an increase in the popularity of competitors games | |||
ª | a negative change in the trend of consumer acceptance of our newest systems innovations including TITO technology |
Demand for our products would be adversely affected by:
ª | a reduction in the growth rate of new and existing markets | |||
ª | delays of scheduled openings of newly constructed or planned casinos | |||
ª | reduced levels of play or weakened customer demand for our gaming machines as a result of declines in travel activity, jackpot fatigue, or customer capital expenditures | |||
ª | a decrease in the desire of established gaming properties to upgrade machines, resulting in a decline in the demand for replacement machines | |||
ª | a decline in public acceptance of gaming |
19
We operate in a highly regulated industry and our ability to operate in certain jurisdictions could be adversely affected by:
ª | unfavorable public referendums or anti-gaming legislation | |||
ª | unfavorable legislation affecting or directed at manufacturers or gaming operators, such as referendums to increase taxes on gaming revenues | |||
ª | adverse changes in or findings of non-compliance with applicable governmental gaming regulations | |||
ª | delays in approvals from regulatory agencies | |||
ª | a limitation, conditioning, suspension or revocation of any of our gaming licenses | |||
ª | unfavorable determinations or challenges of suitability by gaming regulatory authorities with respect to our officers, directors or key employees |
Our intellectual property rights are subject to risks, including:
ª | potential inability to obtain and maintain patents, trademarks and copyrights to competitively protect our newly developed games and technology | |||
ª | competitors infringement upon our existing trademarks, patents and copyrights | |||
ª | approval of competitors patent applications that may restrict our ability to compete effectively |
Our business is vulnerable to changing economic conditions, including:
ª | unfavorable changes in economic conditions including those that affect the relative health of the gaming industry | |||
ª | unfavorable changes in state taxation laws or application of such laws that could reduce our profitability | |||
ª | political or economic instability in international markets | |||
ª | changes in interest rates causing a reduction of investment income or in the value of market rate sensitive instruments | |||
ª | fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, tariffs and other trade barriers | |||
ª | an inability to effectively hedge our foreign currency exposures |
Our outstanding debt obligations subject us to certain additional risks, including:
ª | increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions | |||
ª | limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to fund future working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate requirements | |||
ª | requiring a substantial portion of our cash flows from operations for the payment of interest on our indebtedness and reducing our ability to use our cash flows to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, and general corporate requirements | |||
ª | limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry | |||
ª | disadvantaging us compared to competitors with less indebtedness |
Our business operations are subject to other risks, including:
ª | the loss or retirement of our key executives or other key employees | |||
ª | adverse changes in the creditworthiness of parties with whom we have receivables or forward currency exchange contracts | |||
ª | the discovery of facts or determinations by judges, juries or other finders of facts not presently known to us or not in accordance with our evaluation of possible liability or the outcome of existing litigation related to legal actions pending against IGT | |||
ª | our ability to timely and cost effectively integrate into our operations the companies that we acquire | |||
ª | increased costs due to reliance on third party suppliers and contract manufacturers | |||
ª | agreements with casinos in Native American jurisdictions which may subject us to sovereign immunity risk | |||
ª | acts of war or terrorist incidents | |||
ª | continued work through several implementation phases of our company-wide ERP solution for our computer system procedures and controls; any failures, difficulties or significant delays in implementing or maintaining our computer information systems could result in material adverse consequences to our business, including disruption of operations, loss of information and unanticipated increases in costs |
20
Item 2. Properties
We believe that the following properties are suitable to our business and adequate for our current and near-term needs.
Corporate Headquarters
Our largest manufacturing facility and corporate headquarters is located in Reno, Nevada, where we built a facility of more than 1.2 million square feet to house our manufacturing, cabinet production, silkscreen, engineering, sales and administrative personnel. This facility supports production for all North America markets as well as our other international markets, except the UK and Japan. We are in the process of completing an expansion of our Reno facility adding more than 100,000 square feet. We also maintain leased warehousing facilities in Reno totaling 204,000 square feet.
North America Sales and Service
Our largest sales and service office is located in Las Vegas, Nevada, where we lease approximately 383,000 square feet in warehousing, sales and administration facilities. These operating leases expire between July 2006 and December 2007. In fiscal 2004, we purchased land and began construction of a new 600,000 square foot Las Vegas campus primarily to consolidate several leased facilities that is scheduled for completion in 2007. Additionally, we lease approximately 292,000 square feet of warehousing and sales and service properties throughout the US to support each significant gaming market. We own a 94,000 square foot building in Rapid City, South Dakota, which supports our Native American gaming markets.
International
Our most significant international properties include facilities in the UK and Australia. We own 149,000 square feet and lease 39,000 square feet under leases expiring between March 2007 and December 2009, to support manufacturing, sales and administrative functions in the UK. We lease 88,000 square feet in New South Wales, Australia under leases expiring between October 2004 and April 2008, for subassembly, sales and administration. All other properties used for international operations total 189,000 square feet, mostly under leases expiring through June 2009.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
IGT has been named in and has brought lawsuits in the normal course of business. Management does not expect the outcome of these suits to have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of future operations. For a description of certain of these matters, see Note 13 of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
21
Part II
Item 5. Market for Registrants Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol IGT. The following table presents the high and low closing prices of our common stock as traded on the NYSE. All stock prices have been restated to reflect our four-for-one stock split in June 2003.
Fiscal 2004 |
High |
Low |
||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 36.96 | $ | 28.09 | ||||
Second Quarter |
45.78 | 34.65 | ||||||
Third Quarter |
46.82 | 33.45 | ||||||
Fourth Quarter |
38.17 | 28.72 |
Fiscal 2003 |
High |
Low |
||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 19.82 | $ | 16.31 | ||||
Second Quarter |
21.80 | 18.52 | ||||||
Third Quarter |
25.38 | 19.68 | ||||||
Fourth Quarter |
28.87 | 24.50 |
There were approximately 2,970 record holders of IGTs common stock and the closing price was $35.48 as of December 1, 2004.
We declared quarterly cash dividends of $0.075 per share in June 2003, $0.10 per share in September 2003, December 2003, March 2004, and June 2004, and $0.12 per share in September 2004. No other dividends were declared during the last two fiscal years.
IGTs transfer agent and registrar is:
|
The Bank of New York | |
63 Madison Avenue, 8th Floor | ||
New York, NY 10016 | ||
(212) 503-4279. |
Stock Repurchases
Under the 1990 IGT common stock repurchase plan, as amended and adjusted for stock splits, our remaining share repurchase authorization totaled 35.8 million at September 30, 2004. The stock repurchase authorization is used to return value to our shareholders and reduce the number of shares outstanding. The shares may be repurchased in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, depending on market conditions and other factors. Restricted shares forfeited after issuance are also included in shares repurchased at the original grant price. There is no expiration date specified for this plan. Our fourth quarter repurchases are summarized below.
Total Number of | Maximum | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Number of | |||||||||||||||
Total | Purchased as | Shares Still | ||||||||||||||
Number of | Average | Part of a | Available for | |||||||||||||
Shares | Price Paid | Publicly | Purchase Under | |||||||||||||
Periods |
Purchased |
per Share |
Announced Plan |
the Plan |
||||||||||||
July 4 July 31, 2004 |
1,375,375 | $ | 31.24 | 1,375,375 | 37,865,302 | |||||||||||
August 1 August 28, 2004 |
2,026,800 | 30.85 | 2,026,800 | 35,838,502 | ||||||||||||
August 29 October 2, 2004 |
700 | 35.70 | 700 | 35,837,802 | ||||||||||||
Total |
3,402,875 | 31.01 | 3,402,875 | |||||||||||||
22
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following should be read in conjunction with Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Item 8, Consolidated Financial Statements.
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Years ended September 30, |
2004 |
2003(1) |
2002(1) |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||||||||||
(In millions, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 2,484.8 | $ | 2,128.1 | $ | 1,728.5 | $ | 1,199.2 | $ | 898.4 | ||||||||||
Gross profit |
1,319.2 | 1,094.9 | 842.9 | 534.9 | 397.8 | |||||||||||||||
Earnings of unconsolidated affiliates(1) |
| | 32.5 | 142.6 | 106.0 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income |
814.3 | 665.9 | 516.5 | 395.3 | 267.5 | |||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations, net of tax(2,3,4,5) |
429.8 | 375.3 | 254.7 | 213.9 | 156.8 | |||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations, net of tax(6) |
58.9 | 15.4 | 16.5 | | | |||||||||||||||
Net income(2,3,6) |
488.7 | 390.7 | 271.2 | 213.9 | 156.8 | |||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share(7) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | 1.24 | $ | 1.09 | $ | 0.75 | $ | 0.72 | $ | 0.51 | ||||||||||
Discontinued operations |
0.17 | 0.05 | 0.05 | | | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
1.41 | 1.14 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 0.51 | |||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share(7) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | 1.18 | $ | 1.07 | $ | 0.74 | $ | 0.70 | $ | 0.50 | ||||||||||
Discontinued operations |
0.16 | 0.04 | 0.05 | | | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
1.34 | 1.11 | 0.79 | 0.70 | 0.50 | |||||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding(7) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
346.8 | 344.0 | 338.4 | 295.4 | 306.3 | |||||||||||||||
Diluted |
370.9 | 351.3 | 344.2 | 306.1 | 312.9 | |||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared per share(7) |
$ | 0.42 | $ | 0.175 | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
Cash from operations |
$ | 623.6 | $ | 408.6 | $ | 589.1 | $ | 273.6 | $ | 121.0 | ||||||||||
Cash (used for) from investing |
(48.3 | ) | 69.2 | 51.2 | (122.7 | ) | (2.3 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cash (used for) from financing(8) |
(1,121.8 | ) | 420.7 | (589.2 | ) | (32.6 | ) | (303.6 | ) | |||||||||||
Capital expenditures(9) |
210.9 | 128.6 | 116.2 | 103.7 | 39.1 | |||||||||||||||
Share repurchases |
129.8 | 161.5 | 214.0 | 100.7 | 318.5 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and short-term investments(8) |
$ | 766.6 | $ | 1,315.6 | $ | 430.2 | $ | 377.3 | $ | 266.4 | ||||||||||
Working capital |
949.7 | 1,133.1 | 750.6 | 596.8 | 555.2 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
3,873.0 | 4,185.2 | 3,315.8 | 1,923.4 | 1,623.7 | |||||||||||||||
Notes payable, net(8,10) |
792.0 | 1,552.9 | 972.0 | 989.8 | 996.1 | |||||||||||||||
Jackpot liabilities(11) |
719.3 | 541.1 | 577.7 | 343.6 | 323.9 | |||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
1,976.6 | 1,687.5 | 1,433.1 | 296.1 | 96.6 | |||||||||||||||
Shares outstanding(7) |
346.1 | 345.5 | 347.3 | 291.7 | 290.3 |
(1) | The results of Anchor and the consolidation of the JV following the acquisition of Anchor on December 30, 2001 were included for nine months in fiscal 2002 and the full year in fiscal 2003. Prior to the Anchor acquisition, our share of the JV was reflected net of expenses in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates. | |||
(2) | Fiscal 2002 included pretax reductions of: $20.2 million ($12.6 million after tax or $0.03 per diluted share) related to certain litigation settlements; and $21.2 million ($13.2 million after tax or $0.04 per diluted share) for losses on early retirement of debt. | |||
(3) | Fiscal 2000 included pretax gains of: $27.0 million ($17.3 million after tax or $0.05 per diluted share) related to a legal settlement; and $3.2 million ($2.0 million after tax or $0.01 per diluted share) on the sale of Barcrests Japanese subsidiary. | |||
(4) | Fiscal 2004 includes pretax reductions of: $127.9 million ($81.4 million after tax or $0.22 per diluted share) for losses on early retirement of debt. | |||
(5) | Fiscal 2004 includes a $13.9 million reduction to the provision for income taxes due to the utilization of foreign income tax credits resulting in an increase of $0.04 per diluted share. | |||
(6) | Certain operations acquired with Anchor were sold or held for sale, and therefore reclassified, including gain/loss on sale, to discontinued operations for all periods presented. Fiscal 2004 includes gain on sale of $56.8 million after tax. | |||
(7) | Shares and per share amounts for all periods presented have been adjusted to reflect the four-for-one stock split effective June 18, 2003. | |||
(8) | Fiscal 2004 includes $969.6 million of principal debt reduction. | |||
(9) | Capital spending has increased progressively since fiscal 2000 predominantly due to additional investments in gaming operations equipment. | |||
(10) | Notes payable is presented net of unamortized discount for all years and interest rate swap fair value adjustments in fiscal 2003. | |||
(11) | Fiscal 2004 jackpot liabilities included an additional $165.2 million related to VIE consolidations. |
23
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
COMPANY OVERVIEW
Business Segments
We design, develop, manufacture, distribute and sell computerized gaming machines and system products in all jurisdictions where gaming is legal. Our two primary revenue sources are product sales and gaming operations. We strive to maintain a diversified business strategy with our presence in most worldwide gaming markets and the breadth of our product offerings.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, we finalized changes to our organizational structure and management responsibilities to cover all products in distinct geographical areas. This reorganization included an evolving realignment of our sales organization, which began with the appointment of our new CEO in October 2003. The new structure shifted our focus to managing the business by customer regions encompassing all sources and types of revenues. Operating results reviewed by our chief decision makers encompass all sources of revenues within specific regions.
We currently view our business in two operating segments, each incorporating all relevant revenues from product sales and gaming operations:
ª | The North America Division encompasses our operations in the US and Canada, including the IGT Systems group | |||
ª | The International Division oversees our efforts abroad in Australia, New Zealand, Europe, Latin America, South Africa, the UK and Japan |
Our business segments are designed to allocate resources within a framework of management responsibility. Operating costs from one segment may benefit the other segments. We continually evaluate the alignment of our business development and sales organizations for reporting purposes, which may result in changes to segment allocations. Prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current management view and presentation.
The Corporate Division manages certain unallocated income and expenses related to company-wide initiatives, including capital deployment, treasury and cash management, as well as administrative and oversight functions, such as human resources, information systems, and legal. The Corporate Division includes all debt related costs, including interest and losses on early retirements, as well as interest income and gains or losses on investment securities, hedging instruments and other corporate assets. See Note 18 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for revenues and financial results of our business segments.
Capital Deployment
Our fiscal 2004 capital deployment initiatives included:
ª | the early redemption of $969.6 million of our outstanding fixed rate senior notes | |||
ª | cash dividends paid of $138.9 million | |||
ª | the repurchase of 4.1 million shares for an aggregate price of $129.8 million | |||
ª | initiation of construction projects for a new Las Vegas campus consolidating several leased facilities and expansion of the Reno facility |
We increased our liquidity by nearly $500.0 million as a result of entering into a new $1.5 billion senior credit facility and the subsequent redemption of our senior notes.
Recent Developments
Acres Acquisition
On October 27, 2003, we completed the acquisition of Acres, a systems software development company serving the gaming industry worldwide. Acres provides bonusing and cashless gaming products, as well as a full suite of integrated casino management systems, with patented technology designed to enable casino operators to increase patron loyalty. This strategic business combination provides us the ability to:
ª | utilize the Acres technology in developing more integrated gaming systems products | |||
ª | increase our competitive marketing capacity | |||
ª | position IGT as a leading provider of gaming systems products |
During fiscal 2004, we completed the integration of the IGT Systems group with Acres, combining all development efforts, sales, service and operational organizations related to software systems.
24
Effects of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
As the result of adopting Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation (FIN) 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, we consolidated the New Jersey and Iowa progressive trust VIEs. See Note 1 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for information about the adoption of FIN 46. For the last six months of fiscal 2004, we consolidated $23.8 million in revenues and $24.1 million in related expenses of the VIEs, as well as $186.6 million in total assets and liabilities, primarily consisting of jackpot liabilities and related assets. Although the VIE consolidations had no material impact to gross profit or net income, our quarterly gaming operations gross margin was reduced by approximately 2 percentage points (pp).
With the adoption of Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 04-8, The Effect of Contingently Convertible Debt on Diluted Earnings per Share (EPS), in our quarter ending December 31, 2004, we will include our outstanding contingently convertible debenture shares in diluted EPS regardless of whether the market price trigger has occurred, as well as restate comparative prior period diluted EPS, to include the effect of our debenture shares since the beginning of our second quarter of fiscal 2003.
These restatements will reduce diluted EPS by approximately $0.01 per diluted share in each quarter, resulting in a reduction of approximately $0.03 for fiscal year 2003 and a reduction of approximately $0.01 for fiscal 2004. Fiscal 2004 diluted EPS was already reduced by $0.03 since our debentures met the conversion criteria for application of the if-converted method under existing accounting rules. See Note 1 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of recently issued accounting standards.
25
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the US. Accordingly, we are required to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that we believe are reasonable based on our historical experience, contract terms, observance of known trends in our company and the industry as a whole, and information available from other outside sources. Our estimates affect reported amounts and related disclosures. Actual results may differ from initial estimates.
Critical accounting estimates require IGTs management to make material subjective or complex judgments about matters that are highly uncertain or variable to determine appropriate estimates and assumptions to be used for recording certain financial transactions. These areas of our accounting estimates are also the most sensitive to change from external factors. Senior management has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.
Jackpot Liabilities and Expenses
We estimate our jackpot liability based on the jackpot life cycle, volume of slot play and jackpots won on each system. We also defer jackpot expense for the initial progressive meter liability on a new system. The deferred amounts are subsequently amortized to jackpot expense as the future contribution revenues are generated from the coin-in or slot play.
Our jackpot liabilities totaled $719.3 million at September 30, 2004, including $165.2 million for our VIEs, and $541.1 million at September 30, 2003. We maintain available cash and investments at sufficient levels to fund our jackpot liabilities. We use current market rates weighted according to the historical pattern of winners payment elections to calculate the present value of our outstanding progressive jackpot liabilities. We believe this calculation provides the best estimate of our cost to fund future jackpots.
Our jackpot expense totaled $292.0 million for fiscal 2004, including $23.2 million for our VIEs over the last six months, and $259.3 million in fiscal 2003. The majority of material changes to jackpot expense relate to the volume of slot play and market interest rate trends (see Item 7a, Market Risk). Changes in our estimates and assumptions regarding the number of jackpot winners who may elect single-payments in the future could also impact jackpot expense, as well as the estimated current and non-current portions of our jackpot liabilities. See Note 1 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosure on our accounting policies.
Intangible Assets, including Goodwill and Prepaid Royalties
We review goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment annually, and whenever events or circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable or warrant a revision to the estimated remaining useful life, in accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, and SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
Application of the goodwill impairment test requires judgment, including the identification of reporting units, allocation of related goodwill, assignment of corporate shared assets and liabilities to reporting units, and determination of the fair value of each reporting unit. We determine the fair value of our reporting units using a combination of the market approach and the income approach. Under the market approach, we estimate the fair value based on review and application of market multiples related to revenues and earnings of similar public companies. Under the income approach, we perform a discounted cash flow analysis to estimate the fair value of each reporting unit using our forecasted future cash flows and application of an appropriate discount rate.
Our forecasted future cash flows used to test the recoverability or determine the fair value of intangibles are based on assumptions that are consistent with plans used to manage the underlying business. Factors used in our evaluations of potential impairment and fair value require significant judgments about respective estimated useful lives, risk rates, forecasted growth rates, brand history, expected market growth, competitive environment, market share, future business prospects and success of our products. Changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the determination of recoverability or fair value. While we believe that our estimates of future revenues and cash flows are reasonable, different assumptions could materially affect our assessment of useful lives, recoverability and fair values.
Our goodwill and intangible assets totaled $1.3 billion at September 30, 2004 and $1.2 billion at September 30, 2003. If the estimated fair value or useful lives of our intangible assets were to decrease, the most significant impact would be an increase to amortization expense and/or impairment, thereby decreasing our results of operations. We recorded no goodwill impairment charges in fiscal years 2004, 2003, or 2002.
26
We also regularly evaluate the estimated future benefit of prepaid royalties, as well as minimum commitments not yet paid, to determine amounts unlikely to be realized from forecasted sales or placements of our games. If actual or revised forecasts fall below the initial estimate, then we may need to revise the remaining useful life and/or record additional charges. The carrying value of our prepaid and deferred royalties totaled $130.1 million at September 30, 2004 and $50.9 million at September 30, 2003.
Income Taxes
Determination of the appropriate amount and classification of income taxes is dependent on several factors, including estimates of the timing and probability of realization of deferred income taxes and the timing of income tax payments. We adjust deferred taxes based on the changes in the difference between the book and tax basis of our assets and liabilities, measured by future tax rates we estimate will be applicable when these differences are expected to reverse. This process involves estimating our current tax position in each federal, state, and foreign jurisdiction, as well as making judgments as to whether our taxable income in future periods will be sufficient to fully recover any deferred tax assets. We establish a valuation allowance to the extent recovery of deferred tax assets is not likely, based on our estimation of future taxable income in each jurisdiction.
The calculation of our tax liabilities also involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations. We recognize potential tax liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in the US and other jurisdictions based on our estimate of the extent to which additional taxes will be due. If payment of these amounts proves to be unnecessary, the reversal of liabilities could result in the recognition of a future tax benefit. If our tax liabilities are understated, a charge to our tax provision would result. Changes in current tax laws, enacted tax rates, geographic mix or the estimated level of annual taxable income could change our valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, which in turn impacts our effective tax rate and tax provision.
Our net deferred tax assets totaled $85.0 million at September 30, 2004 and $124.7 million at September 30, 2003. Our accrued income taxes totaled $7.5 million at September 30, 2004 and $31.9 million at September 30, 2003.
Bad Debt Expense
We analyze historical collection trends, customer concentrations and creditworthiness, economic trends and anticipated changes in customer payment patterns when evaluating the adequacy of our allowance for doubtful accounts for specific and general risks. Changes in our assumptions and estimates could change our estimated provision for bad debt, thereby impacting our operating income. Our allowances for doubtful accounts, notes, and contracts receivable totaled $68.4 million at September 30, 2004 and $55.0 million at September 30, 2003.
Inventory
The determination of obsolete or excess inventory requires us to estimate the future demand for our products within specific time horizons, generally, one year or less. If our demand forecast for specific products is greater than actual demand and we fail to adjust manufacturing output accordingly, we may need to record additional charges for inventory obsolescence, which would have a negative impact on our gross profit.
If we experience a significant unexpected decrease in demand for our products or a higher occurrence of inventory obsolescence because of changes in technology or customer requirements, we could be required to increase our inventory provisions. Inventory management remains an area of focus as we balance the need to maintain strategic inventory levels to ensure competitive lead times versus the risk of inventory obsolescence because of rapidly changing technology and customer requirements.
Our inventories totaled $165.6 million at September 30, 2004 and $147.1 million at September 30, 2003.
27
CONSOLIDATED OPERATING RESULTS
Increase (Decrease) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
04 vs 03 |
03 vs 02 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions, except ARPU & earnings per share; * = not meaningful) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 2,484.8 | $ | 2,128.1 | $ | 1,728.5 | $ | 356.6 | 17 | % | $ | 399.6 | 23 | % | ||||||||||||||
Product sales |
1,321.3 | 1,068.6 | 846.1 | 252.7 | 24 | % | 222.5 | 26 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Gaming operations |
1,163.4 | 1,059.5 | 882.4 | 103.9 | 10 | % | 177.1 | 20 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
$ | 1,319.2 | $ | 1,094.9 | $ | 842.9 | $ | 224.3 | 20 | % | $ | 252.0 | 30 | % | ||||||||||||||
Product sales |
690.2 | 523.1 | 363.6 | 167.0 | 32 | % | 159.6 | 44 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Gaming operations |
629.1 | 571.8 | 479.3 | 57.3 | 10 | % | 92.5 | 19 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Gross margin |
53 | % | 51 | % | 49 | % | 2 | pp | 4 | % | 2 | pp | 4 | % | ||||||||||||||
Product sales |
52 | % | 49 | % | 43 | % | 3 | pp | 6 | % | 6 | pp | 14 | % | ||||||||||||||
Gaming operations |
54 | % | 54 | % | 54 | % | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
$ | | $ | | $ | 32 | $ | | | $ | (32 | ) | * | |||||||||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 814.3 | $ | 665.9 | $ | 516.5 | $ | 148.4 | 22 | % | $ | 149.5 | 29 | % | ||||||||||||||
Margin |
33 | % | 31 | % | 30 | % | 2 | pp | 6 | % | 1 | pp | 3 | % | ||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 429.8 | $ | 375.3 | $ | 254.7 | $ | 54.5 | 15 | % | $ | 120.6 | 47 | % | ||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations |
58.9 | 15.4 | 16.5 | 43.5 | 282 | % | (1.1 | ) | (6 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
488.7 | 390.7 | 271.2 | 98.0 | 25 | % | 119.5 | 44 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | 1.18 | $ | 1.07 | $ | 0.74 | $ | 0.11 | 10 | % | $ | 0.33 | 45 | % | ||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations |
0.16 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 300 | % | (0.01 | ) | (20 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
1.34 | 1.11 | 0.79 | 0.23 | 21 | % | 0.32 | 41 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Units shipped |
159,200 | 134,800 | 123,900 | 24,400 | 18 | % | 10,900 | 9 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Average revenue per unit (ARPU) |
$ | 8,300 | $ | 7,900 | $ | 6,800 | $ | 400 | 5 | % | $ | 1,100 | 16 | % | ||||||||||||||
Installed base units (IGT owned) |
37,200 | 34,000 | 32,100 | 3,200 | 9 | % | 1,900 | 6 | % |
Fiscal 2004 vs Fiscal 2003
IGT achieved record financial results in the past twelve months on the strength of our development efforts for games, platforms and systems. Fiscal 2004 showed growth in every measure of our business, including record revenues, machines sold, game placements, operating income and earnings per share. In fiscal 2004 earnings per share increased 21%, we declared dividends of $0.42 per share and repurchased 4.1 million shares.
The increase in worldwide product sales revenues and gross profit in fiscal 2004 was attributed to:
ª | higher volumes in both North America and International markets | |||
ª | a favorable shift in product mix | |||
ª | improved pricing realization related to the breadth and depth of our product offerings | |||
ª | contributions from Acres of $56.0 million in revenues and $32.6 million in gross profit |
Additionally, product sales gross profit and margin improved during the current fiscal year as a result of lower material costs coupled with operational efficiencies in our Reno manufacturing facility.
Consolidated gaming operations revenues and gross profit grew in fiscal 2004 primarily due to increases in our North America installed base and improvements in the game placement mix leading to higher yields per game placed. One additional week in the current year related to the timing of our 52/53-week accounting year added approximately $19.9 million to revenues and $11.1 million to gross profit.
Significant items affecting comparability of income from continuing operations and related EPS in fiscal 2004 versus the prior year included:
ª | a loss on the early redemption of our senior notes due May 2009 totaling $77.0 million after tax, or $0.21 per diluted share | |||
ª | a reduction to our income tax provision primarily related to the utilization of foreign income tax credits totaling $13.9 million or $0.04 per diluted share | |||
ª | a reduction of $0.03 per diluted share in the current year related to the effect of applying the if-converted method of accounting for our debentures since first meeting the conversion criteria in the second quarter |
Discontinued operations related to various Anchor operations divested subsequent to acquisition. See Note 2 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for information about divestitures and discontinued operations.
28
Fiscal 2003 vs Fiscal 2002
IGT also achieved record financial results in fiscal 2003 compared to fiscal 2002, posting revenue growth in both product sales and gaming operations as a result of:
ª | growth in worldwide product sales driven by increased replacement shipments in North America and greater sales of new and expansion machines | |||
ª | the inclusion of Anchor and the consolidation of the JV for three additional months in fiscal 2003 compared to fiscal 2002 |
Improvements in our consolidated product sales gross margin in fiscal 2003 versus fiscal 2002 were a result of:
ª | operational efficiencies at our Reno manufacturing facility | |||
ª | a greater mix of North America units | |||
ª | increased ARPU |
Significant fiscal 2002 items affecting comparability of income from continuing operations and related EPS in fiscal 2003 compared to fiscal 2002 included:
ª | losses on early debt retirement of $13.2 million, net of tax, or $0.04 per diluted share | |||
ª | charges of $12.6 million, net of tax, or $0.03 per diluted share related to certain litigation settlements |
Operating Expenses
Increase (Decrease) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
04 vs 03 |
03 vs 02 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
$ | 293.1 | $ | 272.8 | $ | 221.7 | $ | 20.4 | 7 | % | $ | 51.1 | 23 | % | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
64.3 | 46.7 | 41.3 | 17.6 | 38 | % | 5.4 | 13 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Research and development |
129.3 | 94.9 | 77.9 | 34.3 | 36 | % | 17.0 | 22 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Provision for bad debts |
18.2 | 14.6 | 18.0 | 3.6 | 25 | % | (3.4 | ) | (19 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 504.9 | $ | 429.0 | $ | 358.9 | $ | 76.0 | 18 | % | $ | 70.1 | 20 | % | ||||||||||||||
Percent of revenues |
20 | % | 20 | % | 21 | % | | | | |
Operating expenses as a percent of revenues remained constant in fiscal 2004 versus 2003 and improved over fiscal 2002.
Fiscal 2004 vs Fiscal 2003
Operating expenses for fiscal 2004 increased over fiscal 2003 primarily due to:
ª | the inclusion of Acres which added $32.2 million in operating expenses, including $10.7 million in amortization expense on acquired intangibles | |||
ª | additional R&D costs to support our commitment to develop innovative games, platforms and systems, as well as our entry into central determination markets | |||
ª | higher international selling, general and administrative expenses | |||
ª | changes in foreign currency exchange rates |
Fiscal 2004 also included approximately $8.0 million in additional operating expenses as a result of the extra week in the first quarter related to the timing of our 52/53-week accounting year.
Recoveries of Latin America receivables reduced bad debt expense in fiscal 2003.
Fiscal 2003 vs Fiscal 2002
Fiscal 2003 operating expenses increased over 2002 primarily as the result of:
ª | the inclusion of Anchors operations for twelve months in fiscal 2003 versus nine months in fiscal 2002 which increased all operating expense categories except bad debt | |||
ª | increased salaries, wages and employee benefit costs including group insurance and performance based incentives | |||
ª | severance costs of $3.6 million associated with the closing of a former Anchor facility in Bozeman, Montana and staffing reductions in Australia | |||
ª | our ongoing investment in R&D |
29
Other Income (Expense) and Taxes
Increase (Decrease) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
04 vs 03 |
03 vs 02 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions; * = not meaningful) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 59.8 | $ | 52.9 | $ | 50.4 | $ | 6.9 | 13 | % | $ | 2.5 | 5 | % | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(90.5 | ) | (116.9 | ) | (116.0 | ) | 26.3 | 23 | % | (0.8 | ) | (1 | %) | |||||||||||||||
Loss on redemption of debt |
(127.9 | ) | (1.1 | ) | (21.2 | ) | (126.9 | ) | * | 20.1 | 95 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other |
(2.2 | ) | (2.4 | ) | (20.8 | ) | 0.2 | 7 | % | 18.4 | 86 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other expense, net |
$ | (160.9 | ) | $ | (67.4 | ) | $ | (107.6 | ) | $ | (93.5 | ) | (139 | %) | $ | 40.2 | 37 | % | ||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
$ | 223.7 | $ | 223.3 | $ | 154.1 | $ | 0.4 | $ | 69.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax rate |
34.2 | % | 37.3 | % | 37.7 | % | (3.1 | )pp | (0.4 | )pp |
Fiscal 2004 vs Fiscal 2003
Other expense, net, for fiscal 2004 increased over the prior year due to:
ª | a pretax loss of $121.0 million on the early redemption of our 2009 senior notes including corresponding interest rate swaps, partially offset by pretax interest savings of $10.6 million | |||
ª | a pretax loss of $6.9 million on the early redemption of our 2004 senior notes offset by pretax interest savings of $8.2 million |
We expect savings of approximately $22.0 million to $26.0 million in fiscal 2005 as the result of the 2009 senior notes early redemption, net of the costs related to the new $200.0 million five-year term loan and the interest income foregone on excess cash invested.
Interest income related to our WAP systems operations totaled $29.8 million in fiscal 2004, $25.7 million in fiscal 2003 and $25.1 million in fiscal 2002. Interest expense related to our WAP systems operations totaled $26.1 million in fiscal 2004, $23.2 million in fiscal 2003 and $21.7 million in fiscal 2002.
Fiscal 2004 results included a $13.9 million reduction to the provision for income taxes primarily due to the utilization of foreign income tax credits resulting from changes to the geographic mix of estimated annual taxable income. Excluding the $13.9 million reduction, our fiscal 2004 annual tax rate on continuing operations was 36.4%. We currently estimate our income tax rate for fiscal 2005 at 36.5%.
Fiscal 2003 vs Fiscal 2002
Other expense, net, decreased in fiscal 2003 compared to fiscal 2002 due to:
ª | losses on additional early debt redemptions in fiscal 2002, mainly due to the repurchase of Anchors senior notes in July 2002 | |||
ª | legal settlement charges of $20.2 million in other expenses in fiscal 2002, primarily related to a dispute with a former gaming machine distributor |
30
BUSINESS SEGMENT RESULTS
IGTs operating segments profit reflects income from continuing operations before tax, including applicable operating expenses, and other income and expense. Prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current management view and presentation. See Note 18 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for revenues and financial results of our business segments.
North America Division
Increase (Decrease) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
04 vs 03 |
03 vs 02 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions, except ARPU) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 2,137.1 | $ | 1,890.1 | $ | 1,487.0 | $ | 247.0 | 13 | % | $ | 403.1 | 27 | % | ||||||||||||||
Product sales |
991.1 | 842.9 | 614.8 | 148.2 | 18 | % | 228.0 | 37 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Gaming operations |
1,146.0 | 1,047.2 | 872.1 | 98.8 | 9 | % | 175.1 | 20 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
$ | 1,153.3 | $ | 985.3 | $ | 751.1 | $ | 168.0 | 17 | % | $ | 234.2 | 31 | % | ||||||||||||||
Product sales |
538.2 | 422.7 | 279.3 | 115.5 | 27 | % | 143.4 | 51 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Gaming operations |
615.1 | 562.6 | 471.8 | 52.5 | 9 | % | 90.8 | 19 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Gross margin |
54 | % | 52 | % | 51 | % | 2 | pp | 4 | % | 1 | pp | 2 | % | ||||||||||||||
Product sales |
54 | % | 50 | % | 45 | % | 4 | pp | 8 | % | 5 | pp | 11 | % | ||||||||||||||
Gaming operations |
54 | % | 54 | % | 54 | % | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
$ | | $ | | $ | 32.5 | $ | | | $ | (32.5 | ) | | |||||||||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 838.3 | $ | 722.1 | $ | 584.5 | $ | 116.1 | 16 | % | $ | 137.7 | 24 | % | ||||||||||||||
Margin |
39 | % | 38 | % | 39 | % | 1 | pp | 3 | % | (1 | )pp | (3 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Segment profit |
$ | 859.6 | $ | 740.8 | $ | 600.4 | $ | 118.7 | 16 | % | $ | 140.4 | 23 | % | ||||||||||||||
Margin |
40 | % | 39 | % | 40 | % | 1 | pp | 3 | % | (1 | )pp | (3 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Units shipped |
92,500 | 83,900 | 63,500 | 8,600 | 10 | % | 20,400 | 32 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
ARPU |
$ | 10,700 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 9,700 | $ | 700 | 7 | % | $ | 300 | 3 | % | ||||||||||||||
Installed base units (IGT owned) |
36,400 | 33,200 | 31,400 | 3,200 | 10 | % | 1,800 | 6 | % |
Fiscal 2004 vs Fiscal 2003
Fiscal 2004 North America product sales revenues, ARPUs and gross profit improved due to:
ª | increased replacement units | |||
ª | increased higher-margin gaming systems related revenues, largely related to Acres, which added $56.0 million in revenues and $32.6 million in gross profit | |||
ª | stronger pricing realization for machines and parts, including theme conversions and retrofits |
Additionally, North America product sales gross profit and margin also increased during the current fiscal year as a result of lower material costs coupled with operational efficiencies due to higher volumes.
Total units shipped in fiscal 2004 increased over fiscal 2003 as a result of:
ª | continued implementation of our EZ Pay TITO technology | |||
ª | our extensive game theme library spanning spinning reel, video reel and video poker product lines | |||
ª | large shipments in Nevada, Atlantic City and eastern region casinos, including 13,700 units to multiple Harrahs properties under existing purchase agreements |
These unit increases were partially offset by fewer units shipped into the Canadian provinces of Quebec and Saskatchewan.
North America Division segment profit margin improved in fiscal 2004 compared to fiscal 2003 primarily due to increased gross profit margins and operational efficiencies.
We expect North America product sales gross profit margin to run approximately 55% to 57% in fiscal 2005, on the continued strength of stronger price realization, a greater mix of non-machine related revenues and continued material cost reductions and benefits from expansion within existing gaming markets.
31
At the end of fiscal 2004, we estimated 230,000 machines in the market remained ready candidates for TITO technology. We expect replacement demand in North America to continue over the next few years. However, we expect that the record pace experienced in the current fiscal year will slow down, due in large part to the fact that our largest casino customers have already converted approximately 70% of their slot floors, on average, to cashless gaming machines. Additionally, most Canadian provinces have now fulfilled their replacement programs. We anticipate shipments to new and expanding properties will strengthen in fiscal 2005 as a result of planned new property openings and expansions. See Item 1, Business, for a discussion of our product markets.
Fiscal 2004 North America gaming operations revenues and gross profit increased over fiscal 2003 as a result of:
ª | growth in our installed base | |||
ª | improvements in our game placement mix toward more WAP and instant winner games which carry better yields | |||
ª | increased play levels on WAP games across the majority of the North America gaming markets, resulting from new game introductions and a more favorable jurisdictional mix |
Our installed base grew in fiscal 2004 compared to fiscal 2003 as a result of:
ª | entry into several new markets including New York, Alabama, Oklahoma, and Florida | |||
ª | growth in the casino market due to placements across various Class II and Class III Native American markets, up 1,500 over the prior year | |||
ª | 1,700 additional racino units placed, largely related to the commencement of video lottery operations at four racetracks in New York, as well as increased placements in Rhode Island and Delaware as a result of strong game performance |
While the growth of our North America installed base is dependent on growth in the gaming industry, we also continue to focus on strategies to improve revenue yields centered on managing the types of games and jurisdictions where they are placed. Our installed base of higher yielding WAP games increased 1,000 machines compared to the prior year.
The VIE consolidations increased revenues and expenses for the last six months of fiscal 2004 by $23.8 million and reduced quarterly gross margin by approximately 2 pp. The VIE consolidations had no material impact on gross profit dollars or net income.
Additionally, the extra week in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 contributed approximately $19.9 million in revenues and $11.1 million in gross profit.
We expect our consolidated gaming operations gross margin to fluctuate between 53% and 54% for fiscal 2005 depending on the jurisdictional mix and types of games placed, as well as movements in interest rates.
32
Fiscal 2003 vs Fiscal 2002
Fiscal 2003 North America ARPUs improved over fiscal 2002 related to:
ª | increased non-machine revenues related to gaming systems installations and related parts, game conversion and content fees | |||
ª | increased EZ Pay related royalty and license fees | |||
ª | the realization of price increases |
Fiscal 2003 North America unit shipments increased compared to fiscal 2002 due to strong growth in replacement sales, which increased to 58,000 machines. Shipments of machines to new or expanding properties were also up 14% to 25,900 units in fiscal 2003 versus fiscal 2002. These volume improvements related to:
ª | continued demand for our EZ Pay TITO technology across all major North America markets | |||
ª | popularity of IGT games, including spinning reel, video poker and video-simulated spinning reel games | |||
ª | strong replacement sales in the government-operated public gaming markets, namely the Canadian provinces of Quebec and Saskatchewan | |||
ª | greater sales of new and expansion machines into a majority of casino markets, most significantly in California, New York, Arizona, Nevada and New Jersey |
Fiscal 2003 improvements in North America gaming operations revenues and gross profit compared to fiscal 2002 were driven by:
ª | contributions of Anchor and the consolidation of the JV included for three additional months in fiscal 2003 | |||
ª | increased WAP play levels and enhanced yields per game resulting from new game introductions and a more favorable jurisdictional mix | |||
ª | decreased jackpot expense related to interest rate increases in the fourth quarter partially offsetting increased costs related to royalties, preventative maintenance, and other direct operating expenses |
The growth in our installed base in fiscal 2003 versus fiscal 2002 was driven by:
ª | increased casino placements concentrated in California, Arizona, New York and Atlantic City | |||
ª | increased racino placements in Delaware and Rhode Island | |||
ª | improvements in our game placement mix toward more WAP and instant winner games which carry better yields |
The decline in the North America Division segment profit margin was primarily due to the consolidation of the JV gross revenues for the full fiscal year 2003, and nine months in fiscal 2002. In the first quarter of 2002, the JV revenues were recorded net of expenses in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates.
33
International Division
Increase (Decrease) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
04 vs 03 |
03 vs 02 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions, except units and ARPU) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 347.7 | $ | 238.0 | $ | 241.6 | $ | 109.6 | 46 | % | $ | (3.5 | ) | (1 | %) | |||||||||||||
Product Sales |
330.3 | 225.7 | 231.3 | 104.5 | 46 | % | (5.5 | ) | (2 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||
Gaming Operations |
17.4 | 12.3 | 10.3 | 5.1 | 41 | % | 2.0 | 19 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
$ | 166.0 | $ | 109.6 | $ | 91.8 | $ | 56.4 | 51 | % | $ | 17.8 | 19 | % | ||||||||||||||
Gross margin |
48 | % | 46 | % | 38 | % | 2 | pp | 4 | % | 8 | pp | 21 | % | ||||||||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 81.2 | $ | 50.0 | $ | 24.8 | $ | 31.2 | 62 | % | $ | 25.2 | 102 | % | ||||||||||||||
Segment profit |
83.4 | 55.9 | 25.8 | 27.5 | 49 | % | 30.1 | 117 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Margin |
24 | % | 23 | % | 11 | % | 1 | pp | 4 | % | 12 | pp | 109 | % | ||||||||||||||
Units shipped |
66,700 | 50,900 | 60,400 | 15,800 | 31 | % | (9,500 | ) | (16 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||
ARPU |
$ | 5,000 | $ | 4,400 | $ | 3,800 | $ | 600 | 14 | % | $ | 600 | 16 | % | ||||||||||||||
Installed base units (IGT owned) |
800 | 800 | 700 | | | 100 | 14 | % |
Fiscal 2004 vs Fiscal 2003
Fiscal 2004 international product sales revenues, ARPU, gross profit and margin increased compared to fiscal 2003 primarily due to:
ª | increased volumes in Japan and Latin America | |||
ª | increased volumes in Europe, with shipments to new and expanding casinos in Russia, Slovenia, and Greece | |||
ª | favorable foreign currency exchange rates | |||
ª | greater mix of higher margin sales in casino markets | |||
ª | higher software, conversions and parts sales in Australia |
The fiscal 2004 growth in international machine shipments was attributable to strong replacement shipments in Japan and increased sales in Latin America and the European casino markets. In Japan, NobunagaTM was our highest selling pachisuro game ever at 18,000 units. These increases were offset by fewer shipments in the UK and Australia.
We expect game introductions on new platforms in Japan during fiscal 2005 as a result of our new partnership with the Sammy Corporation, a manufacturer in the pachisuro market. During fiscal 2004 we entered the expanding Russian market and anticipate that our efforts will gain momentum during fiscal 2005. Over the next five years we also foresee other opportunities for international gaming expansion, including the UK, the Asia Pacific regions (including Macau) and Eastern Europe.
International gaming operations revenues are generated primarily from stand alone recurring revenue units. Fiscal 2004 international gaming operations revenues improved over fiscal 2003 primarily due to increased play levels on increased machine placements in Europe and Latin America and favorable foreign currency exchange rates.
Fiscal 2003 vs Fiscal 2002
Fiscal 2003 international machine shipments declined from fiscal 2002 due primarily to lower sales in Australia and Japan, both impacted by restrictive gaming regulations. These declines were partially offset by:
ª | increased sales in Europe, with shipments to new or expanding casinos in Holland, Ukraine, Sweden and Portugal | |||
ª | increased sales in the UK, due to the popularity of new games | |||
ª | machines shipped into the new gaming market in South Korea |
Fiscal 2003 gross profit and margin from international product sales was up over fiscal 2002 despite fewer shipments reflecting:
ª | increased sales in the higher margin European casino markets | |||
ª | increased parts and conversion sales in Australia | |||
ª | favorable foreign currency exchange rates |
Fiscal 2003 growth in gaming operations revenues and gross margin over fiscal 2002 were a result of the growth in our installed base and favorable exchange rates.
Fiscal 2002 gross profit and margin included foreign currency exchange rate losses and additional bad debt provisions recorded for Argentina receivables due to the economic instability and currency devaluation in that country.
34
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Capital Resources
Our principal source of liquidity is cash generated from our operating activities allowing us to reinvest in our business. Our sources of capital also include, but are not limited to, the issuance of public or private placement debt, bank borrowings under our credit facility and the issuance of equity securities.
We expect that our available capital resources will be sufficient to fund our capital expenditures and operating requirements, payments for scheduled debt, dividends, interest and income tax obligations.
Our working capital decreased to $0.9 billion at September 30, 2004 from $1.1 billion at September 30, 2003, predominantly related to cash used for early debt redemptions. Our working capital statistics for fiscal 2004 compared to the prior year included:
ª | average days sales outstanding improved to 74 days from 100 days, primarily due to significant note and contract payoffs in the current year | |||
ª | inventory turns increased to 3.8 from 3.7 |
Cash Flows Summary
Increase (Decrease) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Years ended September 30, |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
04 vs 03 |
03 vs 02 |
|||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operations |
$ | 623.6 | $ | 408.6 | $ | 589.1 | $ | 214.9 | $ | (180.5 | ) | |||||||||
Investing |
(48.3 | ) | 69.2 | 51.2 | (117.4 | ) | 18.0 | |||||||||||||
Financing |
(1,121.8 | ) | 420.7 | (589.2 | ) | (1,542.4 | ) | 1,010.0 | ||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rates |
(0.1 | ) | (3.7 | ) | 1.4 | 3.6 | (5.1 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net change |
$ | (546.5 | ) | $ | 894.9 | $ | 52.5 | $ | (1,441.4 | ) | $ | 842.4 | ||||||||
Cash Flows From Operations
Cash generated from operations in fiscal 2004 improved over the prior year primarily as a result of increased net income and the timing of receivable collections, including several customer payoffs of contract financing in fiscal 2004. Fiscal 2004 payments to extend our relationship with Sony Pictures Television Inc. for exclusive rights to licensed properties through 2014 partially offset these increases. Fluctuations in payment timing for income taxes offset payment timing for accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
Fiscal year 2003 cash flows from operating activities declined over fiscal 2002 due to:
ª | payment timing in receivables, related to higher sales volumes and increased contract financing arrangements with new casinos in New York, Nevada, California, Washington and New Mexico | |||
ª | increased inventories related to increased product demand | |||
ª | significantly higher tax payments as the result of increased profits, timing of the Anchor acquisition and sales of discontinued operations | |||
ª | payments to jackpot winners in excess of collections to fund jackpot liabilities |
Cash flows related to jackpot liabilities consist of collections to fund and payments of jackpots for all WAP systems. Payments to winners include both installment based and single payments. In fiscal 2004, we reclassified all periods to present cash flows related to funding jackpots from financing activities to operating activities. See Note 1 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on these reclassifications and how we account for jackpot liabilities.
Net cash flows related to jackpot liabilities represent timing differences between the growth in liabilities for progressive jackpots and the actual payments to the winners during the period. Fluctuations in net cash flows to fund jackpots reflect variations in the timing of the jackpot life cycles, the pattern of winners payment elections, and the volume of slot play across all of our progressive systems games.
The consolidation of the progressive systems trust VIEs in Iowa and New Jersey also contributed to the increased cash flow volumes related to jackpot investments and liabilities in fiscal 2004.
35
Cash Flows From Investing
The fluctuation in net cash flows from investing activities in fiscal 2004 versus fiscal 2003 was primarily related to:
ª | net cash used to acquire Acres of $109.7 million | |||
ª | additional capital expenditures | |||
ª | increased cash advances related to new casino development financing | |||
ª | initial cash consolidation for VIEs of $47.5 million | |||
ª | receipt of $46.4 million on the Pala note acquired with Anchor |
The fluctuation in net cash from investing activities in fiscal 2003 versus fiscal 2002 was primarily due to:
ª | fiscal 2003 proceeds from the sale of discontinued operations | |||
ª | cash balances acquired with Anchor in fiscal 2002 | |||
ª | increased loan advances in fiscal 2003 related to new casino properties in New York and California | |||
ª | additional capital expenditures in fiscal 2003 |
Investments to fund jackpots relates only to installment based payments to winners. Purchases of these investments occur for the present value of a jackpot when the player wins and elects installment based payments. Proceeds occur as the investments mature, in equal annual installments over a 20 to 26 year period.
Capital Expenditures
Increase (Decrease) |
||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
04 vs 03 |
03 vs 02 |
||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment |
$ | 48.9 | $ | 30.8 | $ | 29.7 | $ | 18.1 | $ | 1.1 | ||||||||||
Gaming operations equipment |
132.3 | 88.9 | 76.7 | 43.4 | 12.2 | |||||||||||||||
Intellectual property |
29.7 | 8.9 | 9.8 | 20.8 | (0.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total capital expenditures |
$ | 210.9 | $ | 128.6 | $ | 116.2 | $ | 82.3 | $ | 12.4 | ||||||||||
North America |
97 | % | 96 | % | 98 | % | ||||||||||||||
International |
3 | % | 4 | % | 2 | % |
Investment in property, plant and equipment increased in fiscal 2004 over 2003, primarily due to the commencement of construction on our new Las Vegas campus consolidating several leased facilities and expansion of our Reno facility. Spending in fiscal 2004 totaled $22.1 million related to these two projects and we plan to invest an additional $96.1 million over the next three years. We invested $3.8 million in fiscal 2004, $4.5 million in fiscal 2003 and $6.0 million in fiscal 2002 to update our internal software systems with an ERP solution.
Our investment in gaming operations equipment increased in the current twelve months compared to fiscal 2003 due to growth in our installed base and leased units, primarily in various Class III Native American markets, as well as growing markets in Florida, New York, Delaware and Alabama. The recent introduction of our AVP, also contributed to additional costs in gaming operations equipment.
Fiscal 2004 investment in intellectual property increased over fiscal 2003 primarily due to additional purchased patents related to our ongoing commitment to the development of innovative games, platforms and systems. The comparative prior years were revised to reflect the fiscal 2004 presentation, which classifies investment in intellectual property in investing cash flows.
Cash Flows From Financing
The fluctuation in net cash flows used by financing activities in fiscal 2004 compared to fiscal 2003 was primarily the result of:
ª | the early redemption of our senior notes due May 2004 and May 2009 | |||
ª | three additional quarters of dividend payments in fiscal 2004 | |||
ª | proceeds of $200.0 million for a new term loan in fiscal 2004 versus the proceeds of $575.0 million from the issuance of our debentures in fiscal 2003 | |||
ª | reduced share repurchases in our fiscal 2004 |
Fiscal 2003 net cash provided by financing activities increased over fiscal 2002 related primarily to:
ª | proceeds of $575.0 million from our issuance of zero-coupon convertible debentures in January 2003 | |||
ª | reduced share repurchases in fiscal 2003 | |||
ª | early redemption of senior notes used $368.4 million in fiscal 2002 |
36
Stock Repurchase Plan
Our Board of Directors authorized IGTs common stock repurchase plan in 1990. The stock repurchase authorization is used to return value to our stockholders and reduce the number of shares outstanding. Our remaining share repurchase authorization, as amended, totaled 35.8 million shares as of September 30, 2004.
We repurchased 4.1 million shares for an aggregate price of $129.8 million in fiscal 2004, 8.4 million shares for an aggregate price of $161.5 million in fiscal 2003, and 14.6 million shares for an aggregate price of $214.0 million in fiscal 2002. The expected timing and amount of our future share repurchases will vary based upon market conditions, securities law limitations and other factors. See Item 5 Part II for additional information regarding these share repurchases.
Credit Facilities and Indebtedness (See Note 8 of our Consolidated Financial Statements)
Senior Credit Facility
IGT entered into a new $1.5 billion senior credit facility (credit facility) with a syndicate of banks on July 1, 2004, replacing the previous credit facility of $260.0 million. The credit facility is structured in two components both with five year maturities:
ª | a $1.3 billion revolver, of which $4.0 million was reserved for letters of credit at the end of the current fiscal year | |||
ª | a $200.0 million term loan, funded on July 15, 2004 in conjunction with the early redemption of our 2009 senior notes |
The interest rates applicable to the credit facility are based on our public credit ratings and debt to capitalization ratio. Initially these rates were set at LIBOR plus 60.0 basis points (bps) for both the revolver and the term loan. A facility fee of 15.0 bps applies to the entire credit facility. The effective interest rate on the term loan equaled 2.2 percent at September 30, 2004, and reset to 2.67 percent on October 15, 2004.
Financial covenants for the credit facility, as defined in the agreement, include a maximum leverage ratio of 4:1 and a minimum interest coverage ratio of 3:1. The credit facility agreement also includes certain restrictions on our ability to incur new indebtedness, issue guarantees, make acquisitions or grant liens on our assets.
If IGT is not in compliance with the required covenant ratios, an event of default would occur. If not cured, the default event could cause the entire outstanding borrowings under the credit facility to become immediately due and payable, as well as trigger cross default provisions to other debt issues. We were in compliance with all applicable covenants at September 30, 2004.
Foreign Credit Facilities
Our available foreign revolving credit facilities totaled $24.0 million at September 30, 2004 and are subject to annual renewals in January and July.
Senior Convertible Debentures
In a private offering on January 29, 2003, we issued $969.8 million principal amount at maturity of zero-coupon senior convertible debentures due January 29, 2033 (Debentures) for gross proceeds of $575.0 million. Absent a yield adjustment, the Debentures have a yield to maturity of 1.75%. The yield adjustment feature may require IGT to pay contingent cash interest on the Debentures at prevailing market rates to be determined during any six month period commencing on or after January 29, 2006, if the average closing sale prices of our common stock for specified measurement periods is less than or equal to 60% of the accreted conversion price of the Debentures during such specified periods.
Senior Notes
In February 2004, we redeemed our $400.0 million senior notes due May 2004. On July 16, 2004, we redeemed the $569.6 million principal amount outstanding of our 2009 senior notes. Including the cancellation of corresponding interest rate swaps in fiscal 2004, we recognized losses of approximately $127.9 million or $81.4 million, net of tax, on these early debt retirements.
Anchors Long-Term Debt
In fiscal 2002, we retired Anchors long-term debt of approximately $337.0 million, net of discount and fully repaid and terminated Anchors senior credit facility of $89.5 million. We also repurchased all but $103,000 of Anchors 9.875% senior subordinated notes due 2008, primarily in a cash tender offer, recognizing a loss of $20.0 million. The remaining Anchor notes were paid off on October 18, 2004.
37
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Increase (Decrease) |
||||||||||||||||
September 30, |
2004 |
2003 |
04 vs 03 |
|||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 3,873.0 | $ | 4,185.2 | $ | (312.3 | ) | (7 | %) | |||||||
Total liabilities |
1,896.3 | 2,497.8 | (601.5 | ) | (24 | %) | ||||||||||
Total stockholders equity |
1,976.6 | 1,687.5 | 289.2 | 17 | % |
Total assets decreased during fiscal 2004 mainly due to early redemption of debt. This decline was partially offset by:
ª | operating cash flows | |||
ª | the additions from the consolidation of the VIEs | |||
ª | the Acres acquisition |
The change in total liabilities during the year ended September 30, 2004 primarily related to:
ª | debt redemption | |||
ª | decreases in accrued income taxes related to payment timing | |||
ª | increases from the VIEs consolidation |
Total stockholders equity grew during fiscal 2004 predominantly as the result of increased net income and proceeds from employee stock plans, partially offset by additional dividends and share repurchases.
38
Arrangements With Off-Balance Sheet Risks
In the normal course of business, we are a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk such as performance bonds and other guarantees not reflected in our balance sheet. We do not expect any material losses to result from these off-balance sheet arrangements and we are not dependent on off-balance sheet financing arrangements to fund our operations. See Note 13 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosures of arrangements with off-balance sheet risk.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The following table summarizes our minimum contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of September 30, 2004 with the expected effect on our future liquidity and cash flows.
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
Thereafter |
Total |
||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior credit facility |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 200.0 | $ | | $ | 200.0 | ||||||||||||||
Interest on credit facility |
5.3 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 2.7 | | 23.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Anchor notes |
0.1 | | | | | | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Debentures, net |
| 591.8 | | | | | 591.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Previous winner payments |
72.8 | 62.2 | 60.0 | 59.8 | 59.3 | 462.0 | 776.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Future winner payments |
146.1 | 19.2 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 22.8 | 192.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Licenses and royalties |
9.2 | 10.5 | 9.9 | 1.7 | 0.3 | | 31.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Community reinvestment |
2.3 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 1.1 | | | 6.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Marketing agreements |
2.9 | | | | | | 2.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Letters of credit |
4.0 | | | | | | 4.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Construction commitments |
36.5 | 48.1 | 11.5 | | | | 96.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Operating leases |
11.7 | 9.7 | 5.7 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 31.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Open purchase orders |
149.9 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | | | 152.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Unfunded loans |
10.7 | | | | | | 10.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 451.5 | $ | 749.7 | $ | 96.3 | $ | 73.0 | $ | 264.8 | $ | 485.2 | $ | 2,120.5 | ||||||||||||||
Our Anchor notes and credit facility represent the principal amount due at maturity. The credit facility quarterly reset interest was accruing at 2.2% at September 30, 2004 and reset to 2.67% on October 15, 2004.
The Debentures are presented net of unamortized discount at September 30, 2004. Holders have the right to require IGT to redeem the Debentures for an amount equal to their accreted value, plus accrued and unpaid cash interest, if any, on January 29, 2006, 2008, 2013, 2018, 2023 and 2028. The accreted value will be $605.6 million at January 29, 2006, $627.1 million at January 29, 2008, and $969.8 million at maturity on January 29, 2033. See Note 8 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to our long-term debt.
Winner payments represent the gross amounts due for jackpots. The timing of expected future winner payments for jackpots are estimated based on historical patterns of winners elections. We maintain cash and investments at sufficient levels to fund our jackpot liabilities and winner payments. See Note 1 and 10 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to jackpot liabilities.
Our letters of credit are issued under our line of credit to insure our payment to certain vendors and governmental agencies.
Certain unconditional amounts payable for royalties and community reinvestments were recorded as liabilities at September 30, 2004. Royalties contingent on future game sales or placements were not included in the table above. See Note 9 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for further information about these and other commitments.
Unfunded loans represent amounts available under development financing arrangements with select customers to finance new or expanding gaming facilities. See Note 5 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding our facility notes.
39
Item 7a. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We use derivative financial instruments to minimize our market risk exposure resulting from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and interest rates. The primary business objective of our hedging program, as defined in our corporate risk management policy, is to minimize the impact of transaction, remeasurement, and specified economic exposures to our net income and earnings per share. The counter parties to these instruments are major commercial banks and we believe that losses related to credit risk are remote. We are not party to leveraged derivatives and do not hold or issue financial instruments for speculative purposes.
Foreign Currency Risk
We routinely use forward exchange contracts to hedge our net exposures, by currency, related to the nonfunctional currency monetary assets and liabilities of our operations. In addition, from time to time, we may enter into forward exchange contracts to establish with certainty the US dollar amount of future firm commitments denominated in a foreign currency.
Hedging
At September 30, 2004, our net foreign currency exposure of $53.1 million related to our monetary assets and liabilities denominated in nonfunctional currency was hedged with $43.8 million in forward currency contracts. Our net foreign currency exposure of $39.7 million relative to our monetary assets and liabilities denominated in nonfunctional currency was hedged with $28.1 million in forward contracts at September 30, 2003.
Given our foreign exchange position, a 10% adverse change in foreign exchange rates upon which these foreign exchange contracts are based would result in exchange gains and losses. In all material aspects, these exchange gains and losses would be fully offset by exchange gains and losses on the underlying net monetary exposures for which the contracts are designated as hedges. We do not expect material exchange rate gains and losses from unhedged foreign currency exposures.
Translation
As currency rates change, translation of our foreign currency functional businesses into US dollars affects year-over-year comparability of equity. We do not generally hedge translation risks because cash flows from our international operations are generally reinvested locally. Changes in the currency exchange rates that would have the largest impact on translating our international net assets included the Australian dollar, the British pound, the Japanese yen and the Euro. We estimate that a 10% change in foreign exchange rates would have impacted reported equity by approximately $1.6 million at September 30, 2004 versus $2.2 million at September 30, 2003. This sensitivity analysis disregards the possibility that rates can move in opposite directions and that gains from one area may or may not be offset by losses from another area.
Interest Rate Risk
We estimate interest rate risk as the potential change in the fair value of our debt or earnings resulting from a hypothetical 100 bps adverse change in interest rates.
Costs to fund jackpot liabilities
Fluctuations in prime, treasury and agency rates due to changes in market and other economic conditions directly impact our costs to fund jackpots, and therefore our gross profit in gaming operations. If interest rates decline, our costs increase, and correspondingly our gross profit declines. We estimate that a hypothetical decline of 100 bps in interest rates would have reduced our gross profit by approximately $26.4 million in fiscal year 2004 and $27.5 million in fiscal 2003. We do not currently manage this exposure with derivative financial instruments.
Senior Notes and Related Swaps
We use various techniques to mitigate the risk associated with future changes in interest rates, including interest rate swaps. In the fourth quarter of 2003, we entered into four interest rate swap agreements with a combined notional amount of $350.0 million, primarily to diversify a portion of our debt portfolio between fixed and variable rate instruments. These swaps were cancelled on July 9, 2004 in conjunction with the early redemption of our remaining $569.6 million principal outstanding 2009 senior notes. See Note 8 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosures related to debt.
Convertible Debentures Price Risk
The fair value of our debentures is sensitive to changes in both our stock price and interest rates. Assuming interest rates are held constant, we estimate a 10% decrease in our stock price would decrease the fair value of our convertible debentures by $60.2 million. Assuming our stock price is held constant, we estimate a 100 bps increase in interest rates would decrease the fair value of our convertible debentures by $2.1 million.
40
Item 8.Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Index to Financial Statements | Page | |||
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
42 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Income
for the years ended September 30, 2004, 2003, and 2002 |
43 | |||
Consolidated Balance Sheets
at September 30, 2004 and 2003 |
44 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
for the years ended September 30, 2004, 2003, and 2002 |
45 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity
for the years ended September 30, 2004, 2003, and 2002 |
47 | |||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
48 |
41
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of International Game Technology:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of International Game Technology and Subsidiaries (the Company) as of September 30, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, cash flows and stockholders equity for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2004. Our audits also included the consolidated financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of September 30, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Reno, Nevada
December 6, 2004
42
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Years ended September 30, |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||
Product sales |
$ | 1,321,336 | $ | 1,068,598 | $ | 846,080 | ||||||
Gaming operations |
1,163,416 | 1,059,539 | 882,432 | |||||||||
Total revenues |
2,484,752 | 2,128,137 | 1,728,512 | |||||||||
Costs and operating expenses |
||||||||||||
Cost of product sales |
631,161 | 545,453 | 482,490 | |||||||||
Cost of gaming operations |
534,342 | 487,779 | 403,129 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
293,144 | 272,757 | 221,673 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
64,333 | 46,700 | 41,287 | |||||||||
Research and development |
129,273 | 94,932 | 77,921 | |||||||||
Provision for bad debts |
18,175 | 14,574 | 18,032 | |||||||||
Total costs and operating expenses |
1,670,428 | 1,462,195 | 1,244,532 | |||||||||
Earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
| | 32,470 | |||||||||
Operating income |
814,324 | 665,942 | 516,450 | |||||||||
Other income (expense) |
||||||||||||
Interest income |
59,783 | 52,908 | 50,423 | |||||||||
Interest expense |
(90,534 | ) | (116,854 | ) | (116,021 | ) | ||||||
Loss on redemption of debt |
(127,939 | ) | (1,057 | ) | (21,176 | ) | ||||||
Other |
(2,218 | ) | (2,395 | ) | (20,827 | ) | ||||||
Other expense, net |
(160,908 | ) | (67,398 | ) | (107,601 | ) | ||||||
Income from continuing operations before tax |
653,416 | 598,544 | 408,849 | |||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
223,663 | 223,257 | 154,136 | |||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
429,753 | 375,287 | 254,713 | |||||||||
Discontinued operations,
net of tax of $35,312, $9,186 and $9,956 |
58,924 | 15,440 | 16,452 | |||||||||
Net income |
$ | 488,677 | $ | 390,727 | $ | 271,165 | ||||||
Basic earnings per share |
||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | 1.24 | $ | 1.09 | $ | 0.75 | ||||||
Discontinued operations |
0.17 | 0.05 | 0.05 | |||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1.41 | $ | 1.14 | $ | 0.80 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | 1.18 | $ | 1.07 | $ | 0.74 | ||||||
Discontinued operations |
0.16 | 0.04 | 0.05 | |||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1.34 | $ | 1.11 | $ | 0.79 | ||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
||||||||||||
Basic |
346,785 | 344,041 | 338,371 | |||||||||
Diluted |
370,892 | 351,316 | 344,195 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
43
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
September 30, |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents (restricted $142,667 and $85,479) |
$ | 765,051 | $ | 1,311,558 | ||||
Investment securities, at market value |
1,572 | 4,013 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowances for doubtful
accounts of $26,064 and $20,945 |
359,714 | 351,062 | ||||||
Current maturities of long-term notes and
contracts receivable, net |
55,202 | 83,752 | ||||||
Inventories |
165,601 | 147,066 | ||||||
Investments to fund liabilities to jackpot winners |
50,191 | 41,502 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
35,944 | 29,743 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
76,429 | 35,044 | ||||||
Assets of discontinued operations held for sale |
| 69,967 | ||||||
Other assets held for sale |
| 4,521 | ||||||
Total current assets |
1,509,704 | 2,078,228 | ||||||
Long-term notes and contracts receivable, net |
87,284 | 133,039 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
329,058 | 261,620 | ||||||
Investments to fund liabilities to jackpot winners |
468,238 | 333,454 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
49,056 | 94,918 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
258,169 | 218,184 | ||||||
Goodwill, net |
1,035,589 | 980,427 | ||||||
Other assets |
135,866 | 85,361 | ||||||
$ | 3,872,964 | $ | 4,185,231 | |||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||
Current maturities of long-term notes payable |
$ | 103 | $ | 406,147 | ||||
Accounts payable |
85,692 | 65,259 | ||||||
Jackpot liabilities |
209,205 | 164,089 | ||||||
Accrued employee benefit plan liabilities |
59,071 | 57,771 | ||||||
Dividends payable |
41,531 | 34,554 | ||||||
Accrued interest |
3,838 | 29,988 | ||||||
Accrued income taxes |
7,537 | 31,928 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
153,032 | 137,769 | ||||||
Liabilities of discontinued operations |
| 17,576 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
560,009 | 945,081 | ||||||
Long-term notes payable, net of current maturities |
791,848 | 1,146,759 | ||||||
Long-term jackpot liabilities |
510,057 | 377,043 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
34,401 | 28,870 | ||||||
1,896,315 | 2,497,753 | |||||||
Commitments and Contingencies |
| | ||||||
Stockholders Equity |
||||||||
Common stock: $.00015625 par value; 1,280,000,000 shares
authorized; 707,972,543 and 703,348,533 shares issued |
111 | 110 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
1,607,717 | 1,537,111 | ||||||
Treasury stock: 361,881,722 and 357,806,048 shares, at cost |
(1,821,770 | ) | (1,691,959 | ) | ||||
Deferred compensation |
(11,822 | ) | (12,697 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings |
2,201,436 | 1,858,658 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
977 | (3,745 | ) | |||||
1,976,649 | 1,687,478 | |||||||
$ | 3,872,964 | $ | 4,185,231 | |||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
44
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
Years ended September 30, |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
Operations |
||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 488,677 | $ | 390,727 | $ | 271,165 | ||||||
Adjustments: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
149,809 | 133,987 | 131,489 | |||||||||
Discounts, premiums and deferred offering costs |
17,844 | 12,655 | 1,197 | |||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
1,970 | 4,361 | 3,348 | |||||||||
Provision for bad debts |
18,175 | 14,574 | 18,032 | |||||||||
Provision for inventory obsolescence |
10,038 | 15,687 | 16,853 | |||||||||
Loss on sale of assets |
228 | 298 | 192 | |||||||||
Loss on redemption of debt |
127,939 | 1,057 | 21,176 | |||||||||
(Gain) loss on sale of discontinued operations |
(90,819 | ) | 13,943 | | ||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of
acquisitions and initial VIE consolidations: |
||||||||||||
Receivables |
21,882 | (105,427 | ) | 5,557 | ||||||||
Inventories |
(22,923 | ) | (21,634 | ) | 16,824 | |||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
(30,706 | ) | 18,567 | (10,700 | ) | |||||||
Jackpot liabilities |
(28,629 | ) | (29,640 | ) | 16,311 | |||||||
Income taxes payable and deferred, net of
employee stock plan tax benefits |
39,645 | (20,119 | ) | 46,628 | ||||||||
Other current assets |
(30,948 | ) | 10,407 | 36,687 | ||||||||
Other non-current assets |
(48,598 | ) | (30,795 | ) | 3,459 | |||||||
Earnings of unconsolidated affiliates less than distributions |
| | 10,881 | |||||||||
Net cash from operations |
623,584 | 408,648 | 589,099 | |||||||||
Investing |
||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(210,888 | ) | (128,594 | ) | (116,165 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of assets |
6,284 | 406 | 15,394 | |||||||||
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations |
151,548 | 155,078 | | |||||||||
Net proceeds from (purchases of) investment securities |
2,500 | 10,000 | (4,685 | ) | ||||||||
Net proceeds from investments to fund jackpots |
26,561 | 17,890 | 17,738 | |||||||||
Cash advanced on loans receivable |
(24,278 | ) | (11,260 | ) | (5,869 | ) | ||||||
Payments received on loans receivable |
62,223 | 25,658 | 21,766 | |||||||||
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates |
| | (1,040 | ) | ||||||||
Acquisition of businesses |
(109,717 | ) | | 124,060 | ||||||||
Initial VIE consolidations |
47,511 | | | |||||||||
Net cash (used for) from investing |
(48,256 | ) | 69,178 | 51,199 | ||||||||
Financing |
||||||||||||
Repayments on borrowings |
(982,595 | ) | (5,265 | ) | (368,414 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from borrowings |
197,479 | 564,973 | 1,974 | |||||||||
Premium paid on early debt redemption |
(120,217 | ) | (980 | ) | (46,279 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from employee stock plans |
52,179 | 49,083 | 72,762 | |||||||||
Dividends paid |
(138,922 | ) | (25,799 | ) | | |||||||
Share repurchases |
(129,678 | ) | (161,321 | ) | (249,270 | ) | ||||||
Net cash (used for) from financing |
(1,121,754 | ) | 420,691 | (589,227 | ) | |||||||
Effect of foreign exchange rates on cash |
(81 | ) | (3,666 | ) | 1,402 | |||||||
Net change in cash and equivalents |
(546,507 | ) | 894,851 | 52,473 | ||||||||
Beginning cash and equivalents |
1,311,558 | 416,707 | 364,234 | |||||||||
Ending cash and equivalents |
$ | 765,051 | $ | 1,311,558 | $ | 416,707 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
45
Supplemental Cash Flows Information
Depreciation and amortization reflected in the statements of cash flows includes the amounts presented separately on the statements of income, plus depreciation that is classified as a component of cost of product sales and cost of gaming operations.
Years ended September 30, |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Investment Securities |
||||||||||||
Purchases of investment securities |
$ | | $ | | $ | (12,715 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from the sale of investment securities |
2,500 | 10,000 | 8,030 | |||||||||
Net proceeds from (purchases of) investment securities |
$ | 2,500 | $ | 10,000 | $ | (4,685 | ) | |||||
Net cash flows to fund jackpots |
||||||||||||
Collections to fund jackpots |
$ | 279,943 | $ | 257,758 | $ | 203,942 | ||||||
Payments to winners |
(308,572 | ) | (287,398 | ) | (187,631 | ) | ||||||
Net change in jackpot liabilities |
(28,629 | ) | (29,640 | ) | 16,311 | |||||||
Purchases of investments to fund jackpots |
(25,088 | ) | (21,691 | ) | (18,454 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from investments to fund jackpots |
51,649 | 39,581 | 36,192 | |||||||||
Net proceeds from investments to fund jackpots |
26,561 | 17,890 | 17,738 | |||||||||
Net cash flows to fund jackpots |
$ | (2,068 | ) | $ | (11,750 | ) | $ | 34,049 | ||||
Capital expenditures |
||||||||||||
Investment in property, plant and equipment |
$ | (48,916 | ) | $ | (30,785 | ) | $ | (29,651 | ) | |||
Investment in gaming operations equipment |
(132,318 | ) | (88,945 | ) | (76,718 | ) | ||||||
Investment in intellectual property |
(29,654 | ) | (8,864 | ) | (9,796 | ) | ||||||
Total capital expenditures |
$ | (210,888 | ) | $ | (128,594 | ) | $ | (116,165 | ) | |||
Payments |
||||||||||||
Interest |
$ | 73,872 | $ | 81,052 | $ | 99,603 | ||||||
Income taxes |
227,982 | 250,180 | 114,685 | |||||||||
Non-cash items |
||||||||||||
Tax benefit of employee stock plans |
15,043 | 28,329 | 33,735 | |||||||||
Treasury stock acquired for stock awards exercised or forfeited |
133 | 203 | | |||||||||
Interest accretion for investments to fund jackpots |
26,127 | 23,157 | 21,682 | |||||||||
Interest accretion on zero-coupon convertible debentures |
10,229 | 6,626 | | |||||||||
Increase in notes receivable from sale of Pala management contract |
| | 63,000 | |||||||||
Acquisitions, including purchase price adjustments |
||||||||||||
Fair value of assets acquired |
149,919 | (1,892 | ) | 1,559,597 | ||||||||
Fair value of liabilities assumed |
40,202 | 1,892 | 714,280 | |||||||||
Fair value of net equity issued |
| | 969,377 | |||||||||
Initial consolidation of VIEs |
||||||||||||
Fair value of assets |
137,733 | | | |||||||||
Fair value of liabilities |
185,244 | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
46
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(In thousands)
Years ended September 30, |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
Common stock |
||||||||||||
Beginning balance: |
||||||||||||
703,349; 696,668; and 626,532 shares |
$ | 110 | $ | 109 | $ | 98 | ||||||
Employee stock plans: |
||||||||||||
4,624; 6,681; and 10,528 shares |
1 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
Anchor acquisition: 59,608 shares in 2002 |
| | 9 | |||||||||
Ending balance: 707,973 shares at 2004 |
$ | 111 | $ | 110 | $ | 109 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
||||||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 1,537,111 | $ | 1,451,385 | $ | 365,233 | ||||||
Employee stock plans shares issued |
52,250 | 49,286 | 72,760 | |||||||||
Tax benefit of employee stock plans |
15,043 | 28,329 | 33,735 | |||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
3,313 | 8,111 | 123 | |||||||||
Anchor acquisition shares issued |
| | 979,534 | |||||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 1,607,717 | $ | 1,537,111 | $ | 1,451,385 | ||||||
Treasury stock |
||||||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | (1,691,959 | ) | $ | (1,530,434 | ) | $ | (1,316,444 | ) | |||
Share repurchases |
(129,811 | ) | (161,525 | ) | (213,990 | ) | ||||||
Ending balance |
$ | (1,821,770 | ) | $ | (1,691,959 | ) | $ | (1,530,434 | ) | |||
Deferred stock-based compensation |
||||||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | (12,697 | ) | $ | (10,748 | ) | $ | | ||||
Stock-based compensation |
875 | (1,949 | ) | 3,225 | ||||||||
Anchor acquisition |
| | (13,973 | ) | ||||||||
Ending balance |
$ | (11,822 | ) | $ | (12,697 | ) | $ | (10,748 | ) | |||
Retained earnings |
||||||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 1,858,658 | $ | 1,528,284 | $ | 1,257,119 | ||||||
Dividends declared |
(145,899 | ) | (60,353 | ) | | |||||||
Net income |
488,677 | 390,727 | 271,165 | |||||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 2,201,436 | $ | 1,858,658 | $ | 1,528,284 | ||||||
Accumulated comprehensive income (loss) |
||||||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | (3,745 | ) | $ | (5,452 | ) | $ | (9,893 | ) | |||
Other comprehensive income |
4,722 | 1,707 | 4,441 | |||||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 977 | $ | (3,745 | ) | $ | (5,452 | ) | ||||
Comprehensive income |
||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 488,677 | $ | 390,727 | $ | 271,165 | ||||||
Other comprehensive income |
4,722 | 1,707 | 4,441 | |||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
$ | 493,399 | $ | 392,434 | $ | 275,606 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
47
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC and include all adjustments necessary to fairly present our consolidated results of operations, financial position, and cash flows for each period presented. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to be consistent with the presentation used in the current fiscal year.
We reclassified cash flows related to jackpot liabilities from financing activities to operating activities, which decreased operating cash flows and increased financing cash flows by $29.6 million in fiscal 2003, and increased operating cash flows and decreased financing cash flows by $16.3 million in 2002. Additionally, we reclassified investments in intellectual property to investment activities, increasing operating cash flows and decreasing investing cash flows by $8.4 million in fiscal 2003 and $9.8 million in fiscal 2002.
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of International Game Technology and all majority owned or controlled subsidiaries and variable interest entities of which we are the primary beneficiary. All appropriate inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated. We account for investments in 50% or less owned joint ventures using the equity method.
Our fiscal year is reported on a 52/53-week period that ends on the Saturday nearest to September 30 in each year. Similarly, our quarters end on the Saturday nearest to the last day of the quarter end month. For simplicity of presentation, all fiscal periods are presented as ending on the calendar month end. The results of operations for fiscal 2004 contain 53 weeks versus 52 weeks in fiscal 2003 and 2002.
Use of Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with US GAAP. Accordingly, we are required to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that we believe are reasonable based on our historical experience, contract terms, observance of known trends in our company and the industry as a whole, and information available from other outside sources. Our estimates affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On a regular basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to customer programs and incentives, product returns, bad debts, inventory obsolescence, investments, long-lived assets, prepaid and deferred royalties, income taxes, warranty obligations, long-term contracts, contingencies and litigation. Actual results may differ from initial estimates.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue when:
ª | persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists | |||
ª | the price to the customer is fixed and determinable | |||
ª | delivery has occurred and any acceptance terms have been fulfilled | |||
ª | no significant contractual obligations remain | |||
ª | collection is reasonably assured |
Product Sales
Our product sales revenues are generated from the sale of gaming machines, systems, parts, conversion kits, content fees, intellectual property royalty and license fees, equipment and services. Revenues are reported net of incentive rebates or discounts. Revenues related to customized R&D contracts are recognized as the related work is delivered. We recognize license fee revenues from business affiliates over the term of the associated agreement unless the fee is in exchange for products delivered or services performed that represent the culmination of a separate earnings process. Amounts received prior to revenue recognition are recorded as deferred revenues. Our sales credit terms are normally 120 days or less. Occasionally, our credit terms may extend up to two years. We also grant extended payment terms under contracts of sale secured by the related equipment sold, generally for terms of one to three years with interest recognized at prevailing rates.
48
For our revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables, we apply the guidance in EITF 00-21 for dividing deliverables into separate units of accounting if:
ª | each item has value to the customer on a stand-alone basis | |||
ª | we have objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered items | |||
ª | delivery of any undelivered item is considered probable and substantially in our control |
The majority of our multiple element contracts are for some combination of machines, systems software, license fees and maintenance. The contracts separately state pricing for each deliverable based on our standard price list (the price charged for the deliverable when it is sold separately) less a specified discount. The terms of performance, cancellation, termination, or refund provisions in our multiple element contracts are similar to those in a contract or sales order for an individual stand-alone deliverable. Each deliverable is accompanied by a fully executed sales order signed by the customer and revenues are recognized when delivery has occurred.
Our services for initial installation, as well as standard warranty and technical support, are not separately priced components of our sales arrangements and are included in our revenues when the product is delivered. If the installation of the product is not considered inconsequential and perfunctory, then we defer revenue recognition until the installation is complete.
License and/or warranty maintenance agreements with customer support terms that extend beyond the standard period included in the sale of the product are recognized ratably over the term of the service period. Revenues generated for additional training and education classes are recognized when the services are performed. When software systems require significant customization specific to the individual customer, we defer recognition of revenues until the software system product is successfully installed, fully operational, and accepted by the customer.
Gaming Operations
Gaming operations revenues are of a recurring nature based on the use of our gaming machines and equipment distributed under a variety of pricing arrangements including:
ª | WAP systems | |||
ª | stand alone participation and flat fee | |||
ª | equipment leasing and rental |
WAP systems games differ from stand-alone games in that they are electronically linked, inter-casino systems that connect gaming machines to a central computer, allowing the system to build a progressive jackpot with every wager until a player hits the top award winning combination. WAP contribution revenues are recognized based on a percentage of coin-in generated by the game. Revenues from stand-alone games are recognized based on a percentage of the net win that the game generates or on a flat fee basis with the passage of time. The operation of linked progressive systems varies among jurisdictions as a result of different gaming regulations. Participating casinos pay a percentage of the coin-in either directly to IGT or a trust to oversee and fund the progressive jackpot. Funding of the jackpots also differs by jurisdiction but is generally administered by IGT.
In both Iowa and New Jersey, IGT licenses WAP systems to the trusts and casino members (trustees) that are responsible for the funding of the progressive jackpots. In Iowa, all linked WAP systems are operated under a single trust, administered by IGT, and IGT receives a fee equal to the net profit of the trust. In New Jersey, each WAP system is operated under an individual trust, administered by IGT or other representatives of the casino members, and IGT receives a flat fee per machine per day.
Prior to consolidation of the progressive systems trusts income statements for the last six months of fiscal 2004 under FIN 46 requirements, we recognized revenues from the trusts per the contractual arrangements between IGT and the trusts. In accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 101, we recognized revenues when earned and collectibility from the trusts was reasonably assured.
49
The trusts collect contribution fees from participating casinos members based on a percentage of coin-in generated by the gaming machines. The contribution fees collected by the trusts fund all jackpots (both won and not yet won) first. When the trusts historical activities in volume of coin-in and frequency of jackpots indicate that the remaining contribution fees are not sufficient to fund IGTs fees, the trusts may defer payment of IGTs fees. Accordingly, we would refrain from recognizing revenue until such time as the trusts cash flows indicated that collectibility was reasonably assured.
Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates
IGT and Anchor were 50% partners in our largest joint venture, The Spin For Cash Joint Venture (JV). Subsequent to the acquisition of Anchor on December 30, 2001, the activities of the JV have been consolidated. Because our joint venture operations were an integral part of our business and the nature of the products and management were the same, our earnings of unconsolidated affiliates were included as a component of income from operations.
Advertising Costs
IGT expenses advertising costs as incurred, except long term outdoor billboards that are capitalized and amortized over the contract life. Advertising expenses totaled $19.4 million in fiscal 2004, $19.7 million in fiscal 2003 and $16.8 million in fiscal 2002.
Research and Development
Our products reach technological feasibility shortly before the products are released to manufacturing and therefore R&D costs are expensed as incurred. Employee related costs associated with product development are included in R&D costs. R&D performed for specific customers is charged to cost of product sales when the related sale is recorded.
Earnings Per Share
We compute EPS using the weighted average number of common and potential shares outstanding. See Note 12.
Pro forma Stock Based Compensation Expense
On October 1, 1996, we adopted SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, which establishes a fair value based method of accounting for stock compensation plans with employees and others. As permitted by SFAS 123, we continue to account for stock based compensation plans in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (APB) 25, which determines the compensation cost of stock options issued for non-variable plans such as ours as the difference between the quoted market value at the measurement date and the amount, if any, required to be paid by employees. Our stock based compensation plans are predominantly plans where the option price is equal to or greater than the price the stock would be in an offer to all shareholders and therefore, no compensation cost is recorded. Compensation cost is incurred with restricted stock awards or when the terms of outstanding unvested options are modified or assumed in an acquisition.
We have provided the following pro forma financial information reflecting the difference between stock compensation costs charged to operations under the APB 25 intrinsic value method and pro forma stock compensation cost that would have been charged to operations had the SFAS 123 fair value method been applied to all awards granted, modified, or settled since the beginning of fiscal 1996, using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. This valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions. IGTs employee stock-based compensation has characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and changes in the assumptions used can materially affect the fair value estimate.
50
Years ended September 30, |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts and assumptions) | ||||||||||||
Reported net income |
$ | 488,677 | $ | 390,727 | $ | 271,165 | ||||||
Reported stock compensation, net of tax |
1,254 | 2,734 | 2,085 | |||||||||
Pro forma stock compensation, net of tax |
(27,727 | ) | (21,343 | ) | (18,560 | ) | ||||||
Pro forma net income |
462,204 | 372,118 | 254,690 | |||||||||
After-tax interest expense on convertible debentures |
6,992 | | | |||||||||
Pro forma diluted EPS numerator |
$ | 469,196 | $ | 372,118 | $ | 254,690 | ||||||
Basic EPS |
||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | 1.41 | $ | 1.14 | $ | 0.80 | ||||||
Pro forma |
1.33 | 1.08 | 0.75 | |||||||||
Diluted EPS |
||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | 1.34 | $ | 1.11 | $ | 0.79 | ||||||
Pro forma |
1.27 | 1.06 | 0.74 | |||||||||
Weighted average fair value per share of
options granted during the year |
$ | 7.11 | $ | 5.72 | $ | 5.68 | ||||||
Weighted average assumptions: |
||||||||||||
Interest rates |
2.61 | % | 1.79 | % | 2.98 | % | ||||||
Dividend yields |
1.14 | % | 0.24 | % | | |||||||
Expected volatility |
0.29 | 0.38 | 0.42 | |||||||||
Expected life (years) |
3.08 | 3.18 | 3.43 |
Cash and Equivalents
Cash and equivalents include both operating cash and restricted cash. We are required by gaming regulations to maintain sufficient reserves in restricted accounts to be used for the purpose of funding payments to progressive systems jackpot winners. The restricted amounts are based primarily on the levels of the progressive systems primary jackpot meters (those displayed to slot players) and vary by jurisdiction. Compliance with restricted cash requirements is reported to the gaming authorities in various jurisdictions.
All cash, including restricted cash, in excess of daily requirements is generally invested in various marketable securities. If these securities have original maturities of three months or less, they are considered cash equivalents. Such investments are stated at cost, which approximates market.
Investment Securities
Our investment securities are classified as available-for-sale and stated at market value. Unrealized gains and losses, net of income tax effects, are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Market value is determined by the most recently traded price of the security at the balance sheet date. Net realized gains or losses are determined on the specific identification cost method.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts on our accounts, notes and contracts receivable that we have deemed to have a high risk of collectibility. We also evaluate specifically reserved notes for placement on non-interest-accrual status. We analyze historical collection trends, customer concentrations, customer creditworthiness, current economic trends and changes in our customer payment terms when evaluating the adequacy of our allowance for doubtful accounts.
51
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market value. We regularly assess inventory quantities on hand and record provisions for excess and obsolete inventory based primarily on our estimated forecast of product demand and production requirements.
September 30, |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 80,510 | $ | 71,263 | ||||
Work-in-process |
4,535 | 7,622 | ||||||
Finished goods |
80,556 | 68,181 | ||||||
Total inventories |
$ | 165,601 | $ | 147,066 | ||||
Investments to Fund Liabilities to Jackpot Winners
These investments represent discounted US treasury or agency securities purchased to meet obligations for annual payments to progressive systems jackpot winners. We have both the intent and ability to hold these investments to maturity and, therefore, classify them as held-to-maturity. Accordingly, these investments are stated at cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts over the term of the security. Many jurisdictions require us to obtain regulatory approval on any liquidation of annuity investments to fund jackpot liabilities.
Property, Plant and Equipment
We depreciate our property, plant and equipment down to salvage value using the straight-line method. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred, improvements are capitalized, and gains or losses on disposal are included in other income and expense.
Useful lives | ||||||||||||
September 30, |
2004 |
2003 |
in years |
|||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Land |
$ | 19,979 | $ | 20,112 | ||||||||
Buildings |
89,958 | 83,870 | 30-40 | |||||||||
Gaming operations equipment |
392,036 | 296,288 | 2-4 | |||||||||
Manufacturing machinery and equipment |
206,499 | 168,317 | 2-15 | |||||||||
Leasehold improvements |
8,141 | 7,973 | lease term | |||||||||
Construction in process |
25,813 | 24,030 | ||||||||||
Total |
742,426 | 600,590 | ||||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(413,368 | ) | (338,970 | ) | ||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
$ | 329,058 | $ | 261,620 | ||||||||
Intangible Assets and Goodwill
We amortize our finite lived intangible assets to reflect the pattern in which the economic benefits of the assets will be consumed based on projected usage and revenues over one to 18 years. We amortize intangible assets with an increasing revenue stream using the straight-line method and those with a declining revenue stream on an accelerated basis. We consider certain factors when assigning useful lives such as legal, regulatory and contractual provisions, as well as the effects of obsolescence, demand, competition, and other economic factors. See Note 7.
We evaluate the carrying value of our intangible assets and goodwill for impairment at least annually in August or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable from related future undiscounted cash flows. Indicators that could trigger an impairment review include legal and regulatory factors, market conditions, and operational performance. Impairment is measured as the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the assets, and is recognized as a component of income from operations. We recognized no impairment in fiscal 2004, 2003 or 2002.
52
Other Assets
Other assets are primarily comprised of prepaid or deferred royalty costs, deferred debt offering costs, and deposits.
Prepaid and deferred royalties
Prepaid and deferred royalties consist primarily of royalty and license fees paid for the use of third party trade names, celebrity likenesses, content, and other intellectual property rights. We have classified prepaid and deferred royalty costs as current and non-current assets based on the period of expected consumption related to projected revenues. We amortize royalties to cost of product sales or cost of gaming operations over the estimated period of expected consumption based on forecasted sales and placement schedules. If a pattern cannot be reliably determined, we use the straight-line method over the contract life.
We evaluate the future realization of prepaid and deferred royalties quarterly. Portions deemed unrealizable related to royalties incurred after the related product has been released for general distribution are charged to cost of product sales or cost of gaming operations. Royalties deemed unlikely to be realized before the related product has been released for general distribution are charged to R&D expense.
Deferred Income Taxes
We recognize deferred income tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of (a) temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes, and (b) operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. We determine the net current and noncurrent deferred tax assets or liabilities separately for federal, state, and foreign jurisdictions.
Derivatives
We recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities at the fair value of the instruments. Accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use and resulting designation. We use derivative financial instruments to minimize our net exposure resulting from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and interest rates. The primary business objective of our hedging program is to minimize the impact to our earnings resulting from exchange rate changes. The counter parties to our agreements are major commercial banks and we believe that losses related to credit risk are remote. We are not a party to leveraged derivatives and do not hold or issue financial instruments for speculative purposes.
Foreign Currency Hedging
We routinely use derivative financial instruments to hedge our net exposure, by currency, related to our monetary assets and liabilities denominated in non-functional foreign currency. These hedging instruments are subject to fluctuations in value that are generally offset by the value of the underlying exposures being hedged. These forward exchange contracts are not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 and resulting gains or losses are recognized in current earnings.
Additionally, we may hedge significant firm sales commitments denominated in foreign currency with forward exchange contracts to protect the US dollar value of the revenues. These forward exchange contracts are designated as fair value hedges under SFAS 133 and related gains or losses are recorded as a component of the hedged transaction in other income or expense. Time value is excluded from effectiveness testing.
Interest Rate Management
We have used interest rate swap agreements to strategically diversify our debt portfolio between fixed and variable rate instruments. The amount and term of each interest rate swap agreement was matched with all or a portion of the then outstanding principal balance and remaining term of a specific debt obligation. The agreements involved the exchange of fixed interest rates for variable interest rates over the life of the agreement without an exchange of the notional amount upon which the payments are based. The differential to be received or paid as interest rates change was accrued and recognized as an adjustment of interest expense related to the debt. Our interest rate swap agreements qualified for the short cut method of accounting under SFAS 133, allowing for an assumption of no ineffectiveness in the hedging relationship. We recorded an asset or liability for the change in the fair value of the swap instruments, with an offsetting adjustment to the carrying value of the related debt. We had no interest rate swaps outstanding at September 30, 2004.
53
Jackpot Liabilities and Expenses
IGT recognizes a liability for jackpots not yet won and jackpot expense for the cost to fund these jackpots in the future. Jackpots are generally payable in equal installments over a 20 to 26 year period or immediately in the case of our instant win progressive jackpots. Winners may elect to receive a single payment for the present value of a jackpot discounted at applicable interest rates in lieu of annual installments. Interest rates eligible for use in the single payment calculation vary by jurisdiction and are impacted by market forces and other economic conditions.
The most recent history pattern indicates that approximately 85% of winners will elect the single payment option. We fund jackpot installment payments through qualifying US government or agency securities. To calculate the present value of our outstanding progressive jackpot liabilities, we use current market prime, treasury, and/or agency rates weighted based on the historical single-payment election ratio. Additionally, we estimate our current liabilities for jackpots not yet won based on our historical experience with winners payment elections, in conjunction with the theoretical projected number of jackpots expected to hit within one year.
WAP Systems Interest
The operation of our WAP systems games results in interest income accretion on investments purchased to fund installment jackpot payments and interest expense on related jackpot liabilities that typically accrues at the same rate as the interest income on the investments. Therefore, interest income and expense related to funding installment-based jackpot payments are similar and increase at approximately the same rate based on the growth in total jackpot winners electing installment payments. Our WAP operations also hold a significant amount of cash investments on which we earn interest income.
Foreign Currency Translation
The functional currency of certain IGT international subsidiaries is the local currency. For those subsidiaries, we translate assets and liabilities at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date, and income and expense accounts at average exchange rates during the year. Resulting currency translation adjustments are recorded directly to accumulated other comprehensive income within stockholders equity. Gains and losses resulting from transactions in non-functional currencies are recorded in income. For subsidiaries whose functional currency is the US dollar, gains and losses on non-US dollar denominated assets and liabilities are recorded in income.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
FIN 46
In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (VIEs). FIN 46 clarifies the application of Accounting Research Bulletin 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, establishes standards for determining under what circumstances VIEs should be consolidated with their primary beneficiary, and requires disclosures about significant unconsolidated VIEs. The consolidation requirements of FIN 46 apply immediately to VIEs created after December 31, 2003 and to older entities as of the end of the first period that ends after March 15, 2004. Certain disclosure requirements apply to all financial statements issued after December 31, 2003.
In both Iowa and New Jersey, IGT licenses WAP systems to the trusts and casino members (trustees) that are responsible for the funding of the progressive jackpots. In Iowa, all linked WAP systems are operated under a single trust, administered by IGT, and IGT receives a fee equal to the net profit of the trust. In New Jersey, each WAP system is operated under an individual trust, administered by IGT or representatives of the casino members, and IGT receives a flat fee per machine per day.
IGT, as the primary beneficiary, is required to consolidate these trust VIEs under the FIN 46 requirements. During the last half of fiscal 2004, we consolidated $23.8 million in revenues and $24.1 million in related expenses of the trusts, as well as $186.6 million in total assets and liabilities, primarily consisting of jackpot liabilities and related assets. The consolidation of the trust VIEs had no material impact to our financial condition or results of operations.
EITF 04-8
In September 2004, FASB reached unanimous consensus on EITF 04-8, The Effect of Contingently Convertible Debt on Diluted Earnings per Share. EITF 04-8 will require IGT to include our outstanding contingently convertible debenture shares in the diluted EPS computation regardless of whether the market price trigger has been met, effective for our first quarter ending December 31, 2004. EITF 04-8 will require restatement of all prior periods presented, which for IGT will include the last three quarters of fiscal 2003 and the first quarter of fiscal 2004. The effect of these restatements will be a reduction of approximately $0.01 per diluted share in each quarter, resulting in a reduction of approximately $0.03 in fiscal year 2003 and a reduction of approximately $0.01 in fiscal 2004.
54
2. Acquisitions, Divestitures and Discontinued Operations
Acquisitions
Acres
On October 27, 2003, IGT completed the acquisition of Acres, which specializes in the development of gaming systems technology designed to assist casino operators in increasing patron loyalty. This business combination will provide us the ability to work more closely with the Acres gaming systems technology to develop more integrated gaming systems products, as well as increase our competitive marketing capacity.
We paid $11.50 in cash for each outstanding share of Acres common stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $134.0 million. We have substantially completed our purchase price allocation as follows:
ª | $44.7 million in current assets, including $24.3 million in cash, and $5.2 million in other non-current assets | |||
ª | $47.2 million of identifiable intangibles, $1.8 million of in-process R&D, and $75.3 million in goodwill | |||
ª | $22.5 million in current liabilities and $17.7 million in non-current liabilities |
The in-process R&D, which had no future alternative use, was charged to expense immediately and the goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes. See Note 7 for the classes of identifiable intangibles. As Acres was not material to our consolidated results, we have not provided pro forma financial information.
Anchor
On December 30, 2001, we completed the acquisition of Anchor, our partner in the Spin for Cash Joint Venture (JV) since 1996. The most notable change to our financial results following this acquisition was the consolidation of the JV. Prior to the Anchor acquisition, we accounted for the JV under the equity method, whereby revenues were reflected net of expenses in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates. This acquisition gave us additional opportunities to combine our complementary resources for the development of new games and become a more effective supplier to the gaming markets, especially enhancing our presence in the government-operated public gaming sector.
The aggregate purchase price paid for Anchor was $986.9 million, plus the assumption of Anchors outstanding debt of $337.0 million, net of discount. The purchase price included 59.6 million shares of IGT common stock valued at $14.88 per share (adjusted for the four-for-one stock split) exchanged for Anchor common stock, $93.0 million for Anchor stock options assumed by IGT, $3.7 million of Anchor shares held by IGT prior to the acquisition, and $3.5 million of transaction costs.
We finalized the purchase price allocation in December 2002, including the resulting JV consolidation, as follows:
ª | total assets of $1.7 billion, including $288.8 million of identifiable intangibles and $853.6 million of goodwill | |||
ª | total liabilities of $702.3 million | |||
ª | total equity of $969.4 million, including deferred stock compensation of $14.0 million |
Divestitures and Discontinued Operations
As we determined certain operations acquired with Anchor were not a strategic fit with our core business strategy and committed to a plan to divest, they were reclassified to discontinued operations and assets held for sale for all periods presented. We ceased depreciation and amortization for discontinued operations upon committing to the divestiture plans.
ª | In February 2003, we sold the assets of the Anchor Coin Nevada slot route operations for a cash price of $60.5 million. In April 2003, we sold the two Colorado casinos for total cash proceeds of $82.3 million. Collectively, we recognized a gain of $184,000 on these divestitures in fiscal 2003. | |||
ª | In September 2003, we sold the pari-mutuel wagering business, UT for a cash price of $12.3 million and recorded a loss on sale of $8.9 million, net of tax. | |||
ª | In November 2003, we sold IGT OnLine Entertainment Systems, Inc. and the lottery systems business of VLC, Inc., collectively referred to as OES for cash proceeds of $151.5 million resulting in a gain of $56.8 million, net of tax. |
55
The results of our discontinued operations are summarized below: |
Years ended September 30, |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Net revenue |
$ | 13,558 | $ | 226,287 | $ | 207,996 | ||||||
Income before tax |
$ | 3,416 | $ | 38,569 | $ | 26,408 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes |
(1,254 | ) | (14,386 | ) | (9,956 | ) | ||||||
Income, net of tax |
2,162 | 24,183 | 16,452 | |||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale before tax |
90,820 | (13,943 | ) | | ||||||||
Benefit (provision) for income taxes |
(34,058 | ) | 5,200 | | ||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale, net of tax |
56,762 | (8,743 | ) | | ||||||||
Discontinued operations, net of tax |
$ | 58,924 | $ | 15,440 | $ | 16,452 | ||||||
Assets of discontinued operations held for sale at September 30, 2003 included $21.2 million of current assets, mostly cash and accounts receivable, and $48.8 million in non-current assets, primarily equipment and intangibles. Additionally, $2.2 million of deferred compensation and $7.8 million of deferred tax liabilities related to discontinued operations at September 30, 2003.
As a result of integrating certain VLC, Inc. operations acquired with Anchor into our Reno, Nevada facility in June 2003, we reclassified $4.5 million related to the Bozeman, Montana building to other assets held for sale. Based on market factors and pending purchase offers, we recognized estimated losses of $0.8 million in the first half of fiscal 2004, and $0.2 million in fiscal 2003, reducing the property value to $3.8 million. The final sale closed on April 7, 2004.
3. Investment Securities Available for Sale
Our investment securities consisted of equity securities available for sale.
Gross Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||
Net | Market | |||||||||||||||
September 30, |
Cost |
Gains |
Losses |
Value |
||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
2004 |
$ | 1,267 | $ | 305 | $ | | $ | 1,572 | ||||||||
2003 |
$ | 3,767 | $ | 246 | $ | | $ | 4,013 | ||||||||
Below is a summary of sales of available-for-sale securities:
Years ended September 30, |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from sales |
$ | 2,500 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 8,030 | ||||||
Losses on sales |
| | (15 | ) |
56
4. Investments to Fund Jackpots
Investments to fund jackpots are comprised of US Treasury and Agency securities held to maturity and recorded at cost plus interest accretion to date.
Gross Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||
Book | Market | |||||||||||||||
September 30, |
Value |
Gains |
Losses |
Value |
||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
2004 |
$ | 518,429 | $ | 63,875 | $ | (3,607 | ) | $ | 578,697 | |||||||
2003 |
$ | 374,956 | $ | 53,205 | $ | (753 | ) | $ | 427,408 | |||||||
Future maturities of these securities through 2029, including the accreted interest through maturity, totaled:
Within | 2-5 | 6-10 | ||||||||||||||||||
September 30, |
1 year |
years |
years |
Thereafter |
Total |
|||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
$ | 60,080 | $ | 281,103 | $ | 250,469 | $ | 169,275 | $ | 760,927 | ||||||||||
5. Notes and Contracts Receivable
Equipment Financing Contracts
IGT grants extended payment terms to qualifying customers under contracts of sale. These contracts are generally for terms of one to five years, with interest recognized at prevailing rates, and are secured by the related equipment sold.
Facility Notes
IGT provides development financing loans to select customers for new or expanding gaming facilities, generally under terms of one to ten years with interest at prevailing rates. Certain agreements may also include provisions for the facility to reserve a percentage of its floor space for the placement of IGT proprietary games, which may be reduced if the machines do not meet certain performance standards. These agreements typically call for IGT to receive a portion of the net win on these proprietary games as repayment for some or all of the amounts financed. Unfunded development financing loan commitments totaled $10.7 million at September 30, 2004.
Pala Note
Subsequent to the Anchor acquisition, we completed the sale of the Pala Band of Mission Indians management agreement, which was classified as an asset held for sale in the purchase price allocation. The sale included a subordinated secured promissory note for $63.0 million, requiring monthly principal payments of $875,000 plus accrued interest. The note was paid off in fiscal 2004.
Our notes and contracts receivable are presented net of unearned interest income and deferred loan fees totaling $3.3 million at September 30, 2004 and $7.8 million at September 30, 2003. The following table summarizes our allowances for doubtful notes and contracts.
September 30, |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Notes |
||||||||
Current |
$ | 1,351 | $ | | ||||
Long-term |
6,427 | 3,637 | ||||||
$ | 7,778 | $ | 3,637 | |||||
Contracts |
||||||||
Current |
$ | 22,520 | $ | 20,393 | ||||
Long-term |
12,080 | 10,008 | ||||||
$ | 34,600 | $ | 30,401 | |||||
Total |
||||||||
Current |
$ | 23,871 | $ | 20,393 | ||||
Long-term |
18,507 | 13,645 | ||||||
$ | 42,378 | $ | 34,038 | |||||
57
The following table presents our estimated future collections of notes and contracts receivable, net of allowances, unearned interest income and deferred loan fees.
Fiscal Year |
Notes |
Contracts |
Total |
|||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||
2005 |
$ | 4,325 | $ | 50,877 | $ | 55,202 | ||||||
2006 |
3,868 | 19,603 | 23,471 | |||||||||
2007 |
3,869 | 7,983 | 11,852 | |||||||||
2008 |
3,203 | 1,573 | 4,776 | |||||||||
2009 |
3,507 | 1,244 | 4,751 | |||||||||
Thereafter |
36,535 | 5,899 | 42,434 | |||||||||
$ | 55,307 | $ | 87,179 | $ | 142,486 | |||||||
6. Concentrations of Credit Risk
The financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents and accounts, contracts, and notes receivable. We maintain cash balances at several financial institutions in amounts that may be in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits.
Our revenues and resulting receivables are concentrated in specific legalized gaming regions. We had no sales to a single customer that exceeded 10% of revenues during 2004, 2003 or 2002. The table below shows the composition of our accounts, contracts, and notes receivable at September 30, 2004.
North America Regions |
||||
Nevada |
25 | % | ||
California |
22 | |||
Eastern region |
9 | |||
New Jersey |
5 | |||
Canada |
5 | |||
Other (3% or less individually) |
19 | |||
Total North America |
85 | % | ||
International Regions |
||||
Europe |
8 | |||
Other (3% or less individually) |
7 | |||
Total international |
15 | % | ||
7. Intangible Assets and Goodwill
The tables below include our Acres purchase price allocation to identifiable intangibles and goodwill. Other patent additions included purchased patents and capitalized legal costs for patent applications.
Weighted | ||||||||||||
Acres | Other | Average | ||||||||||
Year ended September 30, 2004 |
Acquisition |
Additions |
Life (years) |
|||||||||
(In thousands, except life) | ||||||||||||
Additions to finite lived intangibles: |
||||||||||||
Patents |
$ | 12,600 | $ | 23,321 | 12 | |||||||
Contracts |
| 4,598 | 4 | |||||||||
Trademarks |
800 | 1,735 | 5 | |||||||||
Developed technology |
21,900 | | 13 | |||||||||
Customer relationships |
5,800 | | 13 | |||||||||
Backlog |
6,100 | | 1 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 47,200 | $ | 29,654 | ||||||||
58
Intangible Balances
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, |
Cost |
Amortization |
Net |
Cost |
Amortization |
Net |
||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finite Lived Intangible Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Patents |
$ | 286,733 | $ | 64,825 | $ | 221,908 | $ | 251,076 | $ | 40,281 | $ | 210,795 | ||||||||||||
Contracts |
8,094 | 2,341 | 5,753 | 3,500 | 738 | 2,762 | ||||||||||||||||||
Trademarks |
9,828 | 5,969 | 3,859 | 7,293 | 4,092 | 3,201 | ||||||||||||||||||
Developed Technology |
24,218 | 3,717 | 20,501 | 2,318 | 892 | 1,426 | ||||||||||||||||||
Customer relationships |
5,800 | 160 | 5,640 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Backlog |
6,100 | 5,592 | 508 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Net Carrying Amount |
$ | 340,773 | $ | 82,604 | $ | 258,169 | $ | 264,187 | $ | 46,003 | $ | 218,184 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of Intangibles
Our aggregate amortization expense totaled $36.6 million in fiscal 2004, $25.0 million in 2003, and $21.5 million in 2002, excluding any amounts classified in discontinued operations. Our estimated annual amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years is as follows:
Fiscal Year |
Amortization |
|||
(In thousands) | ||||
2005 |
$ | 34,903 | ||
2006 |
31,844 | |||
2007 |
29,562 | |||
2008 |
27,242 | |||
2009 |
25,577 |
Goodwill Changes and Balances by Segment
North America | International | |||||||||||
Division |
Division |
Total |
||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Fiscal Year 2002 |
||||||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 106,036 | $ | 33,522 | $ | 139,558 | ||||||
Anchor acquisition |
825,953 | | 825,953 | |||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
| 1,913 | 1,913 | |||||||||
Ending balance |
931,989 | 35,435 | 967,424 | |||||||||
Fiscal Year 2003 |
||||||||||||
Anchor purchase price adjustments |
10,683 | | 10,683 | |||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
| 2,320 | 2,320 | |||||||||
Ending balance |
942,672 | 37,755 | 980,427 | |||||||||
Fiscal Year 2004 |
||||||||||||
Acres acquisition |
75,314 | | 75,314 | |||||||||
Tax benefit of Anchor options exercised |
(23,300 | ) | | (23,300 | ) | |||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
| 3,148 | 3,148 | |||||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 994,686 | $ | 40,903 | $ | 1,035,589 | ||||||
In accordance with EITF 00-23, Issues Related to the Accounting for Stock Compensation under APB 25 and FIN 44, we have adjusted goodwill for the tax benefit of Anchor options exercised subsequent to acquisition.
59
8. Debt
Outstanding balance at September 30, |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Senior credit facility |
$ | 200,000 | $ | 6,787 | ||||
Senior convertible debentures, net of unamortized discount |
591,848 | 581,622 | ||||||
Senior notes |
103 | 964,497 | ||||||
Total |
791,951 | 1,552,906 | ||||||
Less current maturities |
(103 | ) | (406,147 | ) | ||||
Long-term notes payable, net of current maturities |
$ | 791,848 | $ | 1,146,759 | ||||
Future debt obligations as of September 30, 2004:
Principal | Unamortized | Notes | ||||||||||
Payments |
Discount |
Payable, net |
||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
2005 |
$ | 103 | $ | | $ | 103 | ||||||
2006 |
969,787 | (377,939 | ) | 591,848 | ||||||||
2007 |
| | | |||||||||
2008 |
| | | |||||||||
2009 |
200,000 | | 200,000 | |||||||||
Thereafter |
| | | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,169,890 | $ | (377,939 | ) | $ | 791,951 | |||||
Senior Credit Facility
IGT entered into a new $1.5 billion senior credit facility (credit facility) with a syndicate of banks on July 1, 2004, replacing the previous credit facility of $260.0 million. The credit facility is structured in two components both with five year maturities:
ª | a $1.3 billion revolver, of which $4.0 million was reserved for letters of credit at the end of the current quarter | |||
ª | a $200.0 million term loan funded on July 15, 2004 in conjunction with the early redemption of our 2009 senior notes |
The interest rates applicable to the credit facility are based on our public credit ratings and debt to capitalization ratio. Initially these rates were set at LIBOR plus 60.0 bps for both the revolver and the term loan. A facility fee of 15.0 bps applies to the entire credit facility. The quarterly reset interest rate on the term loan was 2.2% at September 30, 2004 and reset to 2.67% on October 15, 2004.
Financial covenants for the credit facility, as defined in the agreement, include a maximum leverage ratio of 4:1 and a minimum interest coverage ratio of 3:1. The credit facility agreement also includes certain restrictions on our ability to incur new indebtedness, issue guarantees, make acquisitions or grant liens on our assets.
If IGT is not in compliance with the required covenant ratios, an event of default would occur. If not cured, the default event could cause the entire outstanding borrowings under the credit facility to become immediately due and payable, as well as trigger cross default provisions to other debt issues. We were in compliance with all applicable covenants at September 30, 2004.
Foreign Credit Facilities
Our available foreign credit facilities totaled $24.0 million at September 30, 2004 and are subject to annual renewals in January and July.
Senior Convertible Debentures
In a private offering on January 29, 2003, we issued approximately $969.8 million principal amount at maturity of zero-coupon senior convertible debentures due January 29, 2033 (Debentures) for gross proceeds of approximately $575.0 million. Absent a yield adjustment, the Debentures have a yield to maturity of 1.75%. The yield adjustment feature may require IGT to pay contingent cash interest on the Debentures at prevailing market rates to be determined during any six month period commencing on or after January 29, 2006, if the average closing sale prices of our common stock for specified measurement periods is less than or equal to 60% of the accreted conversion price of the Debentures during such specified periods.
60
The Debentures are convertible into 21.1704 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount at maturity under any of the following circumstances:
(i) | during specified conversion periods, if the closing sale prices of our common stock is more than 120% of the accreted conversion price on the first day of such conversion period for at least 20 of the 30 consecutive trading days ending on the first day of such conversion period (for example, the Debentures were convertible during the conversion period beginning January 20, 2004 through April 19, 2004, because the closing price of our common stock was more than $34.18 per share for at least 20 of the 30 consecutive trading days ending on January 20, 2004) | |||
(ii) | during specified periods, if the average trading price for a Debenture is less than 95% of the average closing sale price of our common stock multiplied by the conversion rate for a specified period | |||
(iii) | during any period that our long term senior debt ratings (or the ratings on the Debentures, if rated) are reduced to below Ba2 by Moodys and below BB by Standard & Poors or our long-term senior debt (or the Debentures, if rated) cease to be rated by both rating agencies | |||
(iv) | the Debentures have been called for redemption | |||
(v) | upon the occurrence and continuance of specified corporate transactions |
The market price condition for convertibility of our debentures was met during the conversion periods ended January 20, April 20, and July 20, 2004. On or after January 29, 2006, IGT may repurchase the Debentures for cash equal to their accreted value plus accrued and unpaid cash interest, if any. Holders have the right to require IGT to redeem the Debentures for an amount equal to their accreted value plus accrued and unpaid cash interest, if any, on January 29, 2006, 2008, 2013, 2018, 2023 and 2028. IGT must settle any repurchases on January 29, 2006 in cash. Based upon holders rights to redemption on January 29, 2006, we will reclassify the Debentures to current liabilities effective January 2005. On any subsequent repurchase dates, IGT may elect to settle in cash or shares of common stock or a combination thereof.
IGT may also be required to repurchase the Debentures upon the occurrence of specified change of control events at the accreted value plus accrued and unpaid cash interest, if any. Upon a change of control, we may elect to settle the repurchase price in cash or common stock valued at 95% of its average closing sale price for the five day trading period ending on the third trading day prior to the repurchase date. IGTs right to pay the repurchase price for Debentures in common stock upon a repurchase date or upon a change of control is subject to certain conditions, including the registration under applicable federal and state securities laws of the shares of common stock to be issued.
IGT entered into a registration rights agreement for the benefit of the holders of the Debentures agreeing to file and keep effective a registration statement covering the resale of the Debentures and underlying common stock by the holders for specified periods of time. Our registration statement on Form S-3 relating to the resale of our Zero-Coupon Convertible Debentures due January 29, 2033 became effective with the SEC on June 16, 2003. If IGT fails to maintain an effective registration statement for the time periods specified, subject to permitted exceptions, IGT will be required to pay certain additional cash interest as liquidated damages until the default under the registration rights agreement is cured. Such liquidated damages range from 0.25% to 0.50% of the accreted value of the Debentures plus accrued and unpaid cash interest, if any.
Senior Notes
In February 2004, we redeemed our $400.0 million senior notes due May 2004. On July 16, 2004, we redeemed the $569.6 million principal amount outstanding of our 2009 senior notes. Including the cancellation of corresponding interest rate swaps in fiscal 2004, we recognized losses of approximately $127.9 million or $81.4 million, net of tax, on these early debt retirements.
Anchors Senior Subordinated Notes
In fiscal 2002, we repurchased all but $103,000 of Anchors 9.875% senior subordinated notes due 2008, primarily in a cash tender offer. The remaining Anchor notes were paid off on October 18, 2004.
61
9. Commitments
The following table summarizes our minimum non-cancelable contractual obligations and commercial commitments at September 30, 2004, with the anticipated effect on future liquidity and cash flows.
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
Thereafter |
Total |
||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Licenses or royalties |
$ | 9,215 | $ | 10,475 | $ | 9,914 | $ | 1,712 | $ | 303 | $ | | $ | 31,619 | ||||||||||||||
Marketing agreements |
2,939 | | | | | | 2,939 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Community reinvestment |
2,258 | 1,854 | 1,420 | 1,120 | | | 6,652 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Construction commitments |
36,521 | 48,106 | 11,480 | | | | 96,107 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Operating leases |
11,690 | 9,734 | 5,677 | 2,626 | 973 | 369 | 31,069 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Totals |
$ | 62,623 | $ | 70,169 | $ | 28,491 | $ | 5,458 | $ | 1,276 | $ | 369 | $ | 168,386 | ||||||||||||||
We commit to certain license or royalty and marketing agreements that contain provisions for minimum guarantee payments. Royalties contingent on future game sales or placements were not included in the table above. Unconditional minimum royalty payments due at the beginning of future contract periods totaling $12.0 million were recorded as liabilities at September 30, 2004.
Certain unconditional community reinvestment commitments of $4.0 million were recorded as liabilities at September 30, 2004.
Construction commitments reflect amounts we plan to invest to consolidate various leased operations in Las Vegas and expand our Reno facility.
We lease certain of our facilities and equipment under various agreements for periods through December 2013. Certain facility leases provide that we pay utilities, maintenance, property taxes, and certain other operating expenses applicable to the leased property, including liability and property damage insurance. For leased properties no longer used by us, we have accrued for lease payments, net of anticipated sublease receipts.
Rental expense in continuing operations totaled $11.5 million for fiscal 2004, $9.4 million for fiscal 2003, and $9.7 million for fiscal 2002. Rental expense in discontinued operations totaled $520,000 for fiscal 2004, $17.4 million for fiscal 2003 and $17.9 million for fiscal 2002.
10. Jackpot Liabilities
Jackpot liabilities include the discounted value of jackpot payments due to previous winners, as well as an accrual for the estimated cost of jackpots payments due future winners as follows:
September 30, |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Payments due previous winners |
$ | 776,069 | $ | 573,788 | ||||
Payments due future winners |
192,631 | 167,850 | ||||||
Unamortized discounts |
(249,438 | ) | (200,506 | ) | ||||
Total net jackpot liabilities |
719,262 | 541,132 | ||||||
Less current portion |
209,205 | 164,089 | ||||||
Non-current portion |
$ | 510,057 | $ | 377,043 | ||||
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
Thereafter |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future payments due |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous winners |
$ | 72,827 | $ | 62,218 | $ | 59,944 | $ | 59,833 | $ | 59,246 | $ | 462,001 | $ | 776,069 | |||||||||||||||
Future winners |
146,124 | 19,205 | 1,517 | 1,517 | 1,517 | 22,751 | 192,631 |
Interest expense on jackpot liabilities totaled $26.1 million in fiscal 2004, $23.2 million in fiscal 2003, and $21.7 million in fiscal 2002.
62
11. Financial Instruments
The carrying amount reflected in our consolidated balance sheets for cash equivalents and receivables approximates their respective fair values. All foreign currency and interest rate derivatives are recorded at fair value. The fair value of investments to fund jackpot liabilities, jackpot liabilities, and notes payable are based on quoted market prices. The following financial instruments were not carried at fair value as of:
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||||
Carrying | Estimated | Carrying | Estimated | |||||||||||||
September 30, |
Amount |
Fair Value |
Amount |
Fair Value |
||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Investments to fund jackpot payments |
$ | 518,429 | $ | 578,697 | $ | 374,956 | $ | 427,408 | ||||||||
Jackpot liabilities |
719,262 | 776,699 | 541,132 | 593,583 | ||||||||||||
Notes payable |
791,951 | 859,558 | 1,552,906 | 1,752,316 |
Derivatives
We recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities at the fair value of the instruments. Accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use and resulting designation. We use derivative financial instruments to minimize our market risk exposure resulting from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and interest rates. The primary business objective of our hedging program, as defined in our corporate risk management policy, is to minimize the impact of transaction, remeasurement, and specified economic exposures to our net income and earnings per share. The counter parties to these instruments are major commercial banks and we believe that losses related to credit risk are remote. We are not party to leveraged derivatives and do not hold or issue financial instruments for speculative purposes.
Foreign Currency Hedging
We routinely use derivative financial instruments to hedge our net exposure, by currency, related to our monetary assets and liabilities denominated in nonfunctional foreign currency. These hedging instruments are subject to fluctuations in value that are generally offset by the value of the underlying exposures being hedged. These forward exchange contracts are not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 and resulting gains or losses are recognized in current earnings.
From time to time, we enter into sales commitments denominated in foreign currencies. Our policy is to hedge significant firm commitments denominated in foreign currency with forward exchange contracts to protect the US dollar value of the revenues. These forward exchange contracts have been designated as fair value hedges under SFAS 133 and related gains or losses are included as a component of the hedged transaction when recorded. Gains and losses related to the hedge ineffectiveness are recorded in other income or expense. Time value is excluded from effectiveness testing.
At September 30, 2004, our net foreign currency exposure of $ 53.1 million related to our monetary assets and liabilities denominated in nonfunctional currency was hedged with $ 43.8 million in forward currency contracts. At September 30, 2003, our net foreign currency exposure of $39.7 million related to our monetary assets and liabilities denominated in nonfunctional currency was hedged with $28.1 million in forward contracts.
Interest Rate Management
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, we entered into four interest rate swap agreements with a combined notional amount of $350.0 million, primarily to diversify a portion of our debt portfolio between fixed and variable rate instruments. These swaps were cancelled on July 9, 2004 in conjunction with the early redemption of our 2009 senior notes on July 16, 2004. See Note 8.
Under the terms of the interest rate swaps, we made payments based on a specific spread over six-month LIBOR and received payments equal to the interest rate on our fixed rate senior notes. These interest rate swaps were fair value hedges, which qualified for the shortcut method of accounting under SFAS 133, allowing for an assumption of no ineffectiveness in the hedging relationship. Accordingly, we recorded the change in the fair value of the swap instruments as non-current assets or liabilities with an offsetting adjustment to the carrying value of the related debt.
63
Convertible Debentures Yield Adjustment
The yield adjustment feature of our debentures requires contingent cash interest payments that are triggered by our stock price and is thus considered an embedded derivative under SFAS 133 requiring bifurcation. However, if an upward adjustment were anticipated to go into effect, IGT could exercise its redemption right. Therefore, an investor could be expected to attribute no economic value to the yield adjustment feature. Accordingly, we have ascribed no value and recorded no derivative asset or liability for this embedded derivative.
12. Earnings Per Share
The reconciliation of basic to diluted EPS from continuing operations below reflects the if-converted method of accounting for our convertible debentures since first meeting the conversion criteria in the second quarter of 2004.
Years ended September 30, |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 429,753 | $ | 375,287 | $ | 254,713 | ||||||
After-tax interest expense on convertible debentures |
6,992 | | | |||||||||
Diluted EPS Numerator |
$ | 436,745 | $ | 375,287 | $ | 254,713 | ||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
346,785 | 344,041 | 338,371 | |||||||||
Dilutive effect of stock awards |
8,999 | 7,275 | 5,824 | |||||||||
Dilutive effect of debentures |
15,108 | | | |||||||||
Diluted EPS Denominator |
370,892 | 351,316 | 344,195 | |||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 1.24 | $ | 1.09 | $ | 0.75 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 1.18 | $ | 1.07 | $ | 0.74 | ||||||
Common stock awards excluded from diluted EPS
because the effect was antidilutive |
626 | 868 | 6,048 | |||||||||
Common shares excluded from diluted EPS because the
conversion event for our debentures had not occurred |
| 20,531 | |
There were no transactions since the end of fiscal 2004 that would have materially changed the number of common shares or potential common shares outstanding.
With the adoption of EITF 04-8, The Effect of Contingently Convertible Debt on Diluted Earnings per Share, in our quarter ending December 31, 2004, we will include our outstanding debenture shares in diluted EPS regardless of whether the conversion event has occurred, as well as restate comparative prior period diluted EPS to include the effect of our debenture shares since the beginning of our second quarter of fiscal 2003.
13. Contingencies
Litigation
IGT has been named in and has brought lawsuits in the normal course of business. We do not expect the outcome of these suits, including the lawsuits described below, to have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of future operations.
Acres
In February 1999, the JV and Anchor filed an action in US District Court, District of Nevada against Acres. The complaint alleges, among other things, infringement of certain secondary event (bonus features) patents owned by Anchor and licensed to the JV. Acres responded by filing an answer and counterclaim against the JV and Anchor. Additionally, Acres filed an action in Oregon against the JV and Anchor alleging wrongful use of Acres intellectual property. On April 21, 2003, the parties reached a confidential out-of-court settlement resolving the claims and counterclaims. The remaining case on the issue of inventorship was dismissed in January 2004.
64
Collins
In 1994, a lawsuit was filed in South Carolina, against IGT by Collins Music Co. (Collins), a distributor for IGT in South Carolina. In the action, Collins alleged that IGT agreed, but subsequently failed, to renew a Distributorship Agreement with Collins. Collins also alleged that equipment sold to it was not the latest IGT product available to the marketplace. IGT counterclaimed for the unpaid invoices for machines delivered to Collins, for violations of the South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act, for breach of the Distributorship Agreement accompanied by fraudulent acts and denied all the other allegations. In August 2001, a jury found that IGT breached its agreement with Collins and awarded Collins $15.0 million in compensatory damages.
IGT filed motions for post-trial relief that were denied by the trial court. IGT timely filed its Notice of Appeal. In May 2002, Collins filed a Motion to Dismiss the IGT appeal. Oral arguments on the motion were held in August 2002 and in September 2002, the Motion to Dismiss was granted by a three-judge panel of the Court. IGT timely filed a Petition for Rehearing en banc. Rather than consider the Petition, the South Carolina Court of Appeals requested that the South Carolina Supreme Court take the case on certification. On February 7, 2003, IGT filed its Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari with the South Carolina Supreme Court, which was denied on April 24, 2003. On April 29, 2003, IGT filed a Petition with the South Carolina Court of Appeals seeking further relief that was denied on May 12, 2003. As a result, on June 11, 2003, IGT filed a second Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari with the South Carolina Supreme Court that was dismissed by that Court on June 25, 2003. On July 22, 2003, IGT filed its first Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari with the US Supreme Court that was denied on October 6, 2003. A second Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari with the US Supreme was timely filed and denied on December 8, 2003. The judgment plus accrued interest was paid on April 2, 2004 and a Satisfaction of Judgment recorded. IGT is continuing to dispute in South Carolina the amount of interest paid because it exceeds the present statutory amount.
Environmental Matters
Colorado Central Station Casino (CCSC), a casino operation sold by IGT in April 2003, is located in an area that has been designated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a superfund site as a result of contamination from historic mining activity in the area. The EPA is entitled to proceed against current and prior owners and operators of properties located within the site for remediation and response costs associated with their properties and with the entire site. CCSC is located within the drainage basin of North Clear Creek and is therefore subjected to potentially contaminated surface and ground water from upstream mining related sources. Soil and ground water samples on the site indicate that several contaminants exist in concentrations exceeding drinking water standards. We have applied the guidance in Statement of Position 96-1 Environmental Remediation Liabilities and determined that a liability has not been incurred.
Kraft
In July 2001, an individual, Mary Kraft, filed a complaint against IGT, Anchor and the three operators of casinos in Detroit, Michigan. IGT was never served with the complaint and was voluntarily dismissed from the litigation. In September 2001, IGT filed a motion to intervene as a party defendant. The plaintiff claimed the bonus wheel feature of the Wheel of Fortune® and I Dream of Jeannie slot machines, which are manufactured, designed and programmed by IGT and/or Anchor, are deceptive and misleading. Specifically, the plaintiff alleged that the bonus wheels on these games do not randomly land on a given dollar amount but are programmed to provide a predetermined frequency of payouts. The complaint alleged violations of the Michigan Consumer Protection Act, common law fraud and unjust enrichment and asked for unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, disgorgement of profits, injunctive and other equitable relief, and costs and attorneys fees. The Michigan Gaming Control Board, the administrative agency responsible for regulating the Detroit casinos, approved the machines and their programs for use. In April 2002, the Court granted the Summary Disposition filed by IGT and Anchor and dismissed the Plaintiffs complaint. On April 13, 2004 the Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed dismissal of the complaint.
Miller
In June 2003, a class action lawsuit was filed in Clark County, Nevada, District Court against Acres and its directors, entitled Paul Miller v. Acres Gaming Incorporated, et al., (Case No. 470016). The complaint alleged that Acres directors breached their fiduciary duties to their stockholders in connection with the approval of the merger transaction between Acres and IGT and sought to enjoin and/or void the merger agreement among other forms of relief. On September 19, 2003, the Court denied plaintiffs motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) to prevent Acres stockholders from voting on the merger. On September 24, 2003, plaintiff petitioned the Nevada Supreme Court to vacate the denial of the TRO and to enjoin Acres from holding its stockholder vote on the merger. The Nevada Supreme Court denied the petition on September 25, 2003. The plaintiffs action also seeks damages. On December 23, 2003, defendants filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs
65
second amended complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. On April 29, 2004, the Court issued a ruling denying defendants motion to dismiss the second amended complaint. On May 12, 2004 the State Court issued an order denying defendants motion to dismiss. Pursuant to stipulation of the parties on August 13, 2004, plaintiff filed a third amended complaint.
Nevada Sales/Use Tax Matter
In February 2003, an IGT employee, presently on administrative leave, filed a sealed complaint under Nevadas False Claims Act (State of Nevada ex rel. James McAndrews v. International Game Technology, Anchor Coin and Spin for Cash Wide Area Progressive, CV03 01329, 2d Jud. Dist. Court of Nevada) alleging that IGT failed to pay requisite Nevada sales/use taxes on certain Wheel of Fortune® games placed in Nevada since 1997 and in connection with royalties received under intellectual property licensing agreements related to the placement of Action Gaming games in Nevada since 1997.
The Attorney General and IGT both filed motions to dismiss the complaint in January 2004, and the Court unsealed the action in February 2004. The Court denied both motions to dismiss the complaint on July 1, 2004. A Petition for Writ of Mandamus was filed with the Nevada Supreme Court in September 2004. The Court granted the petition and a stay of the lower court proceedings was filed in the trial court in September 2004.
In October 2004, the Nevada Department of Taxation (Department) advised IGT that it had a good-faith legal basis for its position that no sales tax was payable on royalties received, but also advised IGT that the Department believed that sales tax may be payable on some amount of the royalties. IGT disagrees with the Departments position that sales tax may be payable on any part of the royalties and continues to correspond with the Department on this issue.
OSHA Matter
On July 8, 2004, two former employees filed a complaint with the US Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, alleging retaliatory termination in violation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The former employees allege that they were terminated in retaliation for questioning whether Anchor and its executives failed to properly disclose information allegedly affecting the value of Anchors patents in connection with IGTs acquisition of Anchor in 2001. The former employees also allege that the acquired patents are overvalued on the financial statements of IGT. Outside counsel, retained by an independent committee of the Board of Directors, reviewed the allegations and found them to be entirely without merit.
In the purchase price allocation, IGT used the relief of royalty valuation methodology to estimate the fair value of the patents at $164.4 million, which is being amortized over the useful economic life. The carrying value of the patents at September 30, 2004 totaled $124.4 million, with a remaining life of approximately 12 years. On November 10, 2004, the employees withdrew their complaint filed with OSHA and filed a notice of intent to file a complaint in federal court. On December 1, 2004, a complaint was filed in the US District Court for Nevada alleging substantially the same claims raised by the employees in their OSHA complaint regarding the value of the above-mentioned Anchor patents, and also alleging tortuous discharge, intentional interference with contractual relations, and, for one of the employees, intentional infliction of emotional distress. IGT believes that the allegations are without merit and intends to vigorously defend this matter.
Poulos
Along with a number of other public gaming corporations, IGT is a defendant in three class action lawsuits: one filed in the US District Court of Nevada, entitled Larry Schreier v. Caesars World, Inc., et al, and two filed in the US District Court of Florida, entitled Poulos v. Caesars World, Inc., et al. and Ahern v. Caesars World, Inc., et al., which have been consolidated into a single action. The Court granted the defendants motion to transfer venue of the consolidated action to Las Vegas. The actions allege that the defendants have engaged in fraudulent and misleading conduct by inducing people to play video poker machines and electronic slot machines, based on false beliefs concerning how the machines operate and the extent to which there is an opportunity to win on a given play. The amended complaint alleges that the defendants acts constitute violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, and also give rise to claims for common law fraud and unjust enrichment, and seeks compensatory, special, incidental and punitive damages of several billion dollars. In December 1997, the Court denied the motions that would have dismissed the Consolidated Amended Complaint or that would have stayed the action pending Nevada gaming regulatory action. The defendants filed their consolidated answer to the Consolidated Amended Complaint in February 1998. In March 2002, the Court directed that certain merits discovery could proceed. In June 2002, the Court denied the plaintiffs motion for class certification. An appeal of that denial was filed timely with the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. All
66
briefings were completed and oral arguments were heard in January 2004. On August 10, 2004, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld US District Court Judge Roger Hunt in his denial of class certification. The class plaintiffs did not appeal the decision and are proceeding with only their individual claims.
Siena
In November 2001, Wild Games NG, LLC, owner and operator of the Siena Hotel Spa Casino filed suit against Acres Gaming in Washoe County Nevada District Court. Siena alleges Acres failed to perform obligations under an Equipment Sale Agreement and seeks consequential damages largely comprised of lost profits. Acres believes that Sienas claims are unfounded and not permitted by the Equipment Sales Agreement. Acres has filed a counterclaim seeking payments due from Siena. All discovery has been completed and a jury trial is scheduled to commence on or about March 14, 2005.
Arrangements with Off-Balance Sheet Risks
In the normal course of business, we are a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk such as performance bonds, guarantees and product warranties not reflected in our balance sheet. We do not expect any material losses to result from these off-balance sheet arrangements and we are not dependent on off-balance sheet financing arrangements to fund our operations.
Performance Bonds
Our performance bonds outstanding related to our gaming operation totaled $5.4 million at September 30, 2004 and $55.5 million, including $46.5 million for our discontinued lottery operations at September 30, 2003. We are liable to reimburse the bond issuer in the event the bonds are exercised as a result of our nonperformance.
Our outstanding letters of credit issued under our line of credit to insure our payment to certain vendors and governmental agencies totaled $4.0 million at September 30, 2004 and $6.4 million at September 30, 2003.
IGT Licensor Arrangements
Our sales agreements that include software and intellectual property licensing arrangements may provide a clause whereby IGT indemnifies the third party licensee against liability and damages (including legal defense costs) arising from any claims of patent, copyright, trademark or trade secret infringement. Should such a claim occur, we could be required to make payments to the licensee for any liabilities or damages incurred. We are not able to estimate the maximum potential amount of future payments under this guarantee because it depends on the occurrence of future events.
Product Warranties
We accrue for warranty costs based on historical trends in product failure rates and the expected material and labor costs to provide warranty services. The majority of our products are generally covered by a warranty for periods ranging from 90 days to one year. The following table summarizes the activities related to our product warranty liability.
September 30, |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Balance at beginning of year |
$ | 6,104 | $ | 3,332 | ||||
Reduction for payments made |
(4,039 | ) | (2,549 | ) | ||||
Accrual for new warranties issued |
5,276 | 5,711 | ||||||
Adjustments for pre-existing warranties |
(402 | ) | (390 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 6,939 | $ | 6,104 | ||||
Self-Insurance
We are self-insured for various levels of workers compensation, directors and officers liability, electronic errors and omissions liability, as well as employee medical, dental, prescription drug, and disability coverage. We purchase stop loss coverage to protect against unexpected claims. Accrued insurance claims and reserves include estimated settlements for known claims, and actuarial estimates of claims incurred but not reported.
State and Federal Taxes
We are subject to sales, use, income and other tax audits and administrative proceedings in various federal, state, and local jurisdictions. While we believe we have properly reported our tax liabilities in each jurisdiction, we can give no assurance that taxing authorities will not propose adjustments that increase our tax liabilities.
67
14. Income Taxes
Income from continuing operations pretax consisted of the following:
September 30, |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
US |
$ | 612,483 | $ | 576,223 | $ | 391,334 | ||||||
Non US |
40,933 | 22,321 | 17,515 | |||||||||
Income from continuing operations pretax |
$ | 653,416 | $ | 598,544 | $ | 408,849 | ||||||
The effective income tax rates differ from the statutory US federal income tax rates as follows:
Years ended September 30, |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Amount |
Rate |
Amount |
Rate |
Amount |
Rate |
||||||||||||||||||
Taxes at federal statutory rate |
$ | 228,696 | 35.0 | % | $ | 209,491 | 35.0 | % | $ | 143,097 | 35.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Foreign subsidiaries tax, net |
(2,002 | ) | (0.3 | ) | 6,057 | 1.0 | 3,151 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||||||
State income tax, net |
19,941 | 3.0 | 14,434 | 2.4 | 9,404 | 2.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Prior years foreign tax credits |
(16,279 | ) | (2.5 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Other, net |
(6,693 | ) | (1.0 | ) | (6,725 | ) | (1.1 | ) | (1,516 | ) | (0.4 | ) | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
$ | 223,663 | 34.2 | % | $ | 223,257 | 37.3 | % | $ | 154,136 | 37.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Components of our provision for income taxes on continuing operations were as follows:
Years ended September 30, |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Current |
||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | 163,358 | $ | 205,360 | $ | 165,620 | ||||||
State |
28,647 | 21,862 | 13,209 | |||||||||
Foreign |
10,318 | 6,214 | 4,744 | |||||||||
Total current |
202,323 | 233,436 | 183,573 | |||||||||
Deferred |
||||||||||||
Federal |
20,089 | (9,837 | ) | (24,951 | ) | |||||||
State |
1,720 | (646 | ) | (4,589 | ) | |||||||
Foreign |
(469 | ) | 304 | 103 | ||||||||
Total deferred |
21,340 | (10,179 | ) | (29,437 | ) | |||||||
Provision for income taxes |
$ | 223,663 | $ | 223,257 | $ | 154,136 | ||||||
68
Significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities are presented below. Our valuation allowance was established due to uncertainty regarding realization of deferred tax assets related to our operations in Australia.
September 30, |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Current deferred tax assets |
||||||||
Reserves not currently deductible |
$ | 38,159 | $ | 32,422 | ||||
Unrealized loss on currency translation adjustments |
| 2,103 | ||||||
Other |
868 | 3,058 | ||||||
39,027 | 37,583 | |||||||
Current deferred tax liabilities |
||||||||
Acquired assets held for sale |
| (7,840 | ) | |||||
Unrealized gain on currency translation adjustments |
(167 | ) | | |||||
Prepaid expenses currently deductible |
(2,916 | ) | | |||||
(3,083 | ) | (7,840 | ) | |||||
Net current deferred tax assets |
35,944 | 29,743 | ||||||
Non-current deferred tax assets |
||||||||
Jackpot payment timing difference |
138,017 | 140,905 | ||||||
Foreign subsidiaries |
15,791 | 15,532 | ||||||
State income taxes |
5,730 | 12,803 | ||||||
Goodwill and intangibles |
15,896 | 19,333 | ||||||
Net operating loss carry forwards |
9,873 | 11,075 | ||||||
Other |
276 | 5,894 | ||||||
185,583 | 205,542 | |||||||
Non-current deferred tax liabilities |
||||||||
Difference between book and tax basis of property |
(39,388 | ) | (30,280 | ) | ||||
Acquisition related intangibles |
(58,833 | ) | (54,090 | ) | ||||
Interest expense on convertible debt |
(18,322 | ) | (6,928 | ) | ||||
Patents |
(4,966 | ) | (4,097 | ) | ||||
Valuation allowance |
(15,018 | ) | (15,229 | ) | ||||
(136,527 | ) | (110,624 | ) | |||||
Net non-current deferred tax assets |
49,056 | 94,918 | ||||||
Net deferred tax assets |
$ | 85,000 | $ | 124,661 | ||||
We have not provided for US deferred income taxes or foreign withholding taxes on approximately $23.0 million of our cumulative undistributed earnings for certain non-US subsidiaries. We intend for these earnings to be permanently reinvested in operations outside the United States.
69
15. Other Comprehensive Income
The components of IGTs other comprehensive income were as follows:
Pretax | Tax | After tax | ||||||||||
Years ended September 30, |
Amount |
Expense |
Amount |
|||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
2004 |
||||||||||||
Unrealized holding gains |
$ | 50 | $ | 18 | $ | 32 | ||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
7,386 | 2,696 | 4,690 | |||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
$ | 7,436 | $ | 2,714 | $ | 4,722 | ||||||
2003 |
||||||||||||
Unrealized holding gains |
$ | 520 | $ | 182 | $ | 338 | ||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
2,106 | 737 | 1,369 | |||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
$ | 2,626 | $ | 919 | $ | 1,707 | ||||||
2002 |
||||||||||||
Unrealized holding gains |
$ | 1,289 | $ | 451 | $ | 838 | ||||||
Reclassification adjustment to net income |
15 | 5 | 10 | |||||||||
Net unrealized gains |
1,304 | 456 | 848 | |||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
5,528 | 1,935 | 3,593 | |||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
$ | 6,832 | $ | 2,391 | $ | 4,441 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) was comprised of the following:
Unrealized | Foreign | Accumulated Other | ||||||||||
Gains (Losses) | Currency | Comprehensive | ||||||||||
September 30, |
on Securities |
Translation |
Income (Loss) |
|||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
2002 |
$ | (177 | ) | $ | (5,275 | ) | $ | (5,452 | ) | |||
Annual net change |
338 | 1,369 | 1,707 | |||||||||
2003 |
161 | (3,906 | ) | (3,745 | ) | |||||||
Annual net change |
32 | 4,690 | 4,722 | |||||||||
2004 |
$ | 193 | $ | 784 | $ | 977 | ||||||
70
16. Employee Benefit Plans
We have established a variety of employee benefit programs to attract, retain and motivate our employees.
Employee Incentive Plans
Our profit sharing and 401(k) plan was adopted for IGT employees working in the
US. IGT matches 100% of an employees contributions up to $750 per year.
Participants immediately vest in their contributions and IGTs matching
contributions. Additionally, we contribute a portion of our profits to
eligible employees, which vest over a seven-year period. Cash sharing is
distributed semi-annually to all eligible employees and management bonuses are
paid annually to selected employees.
Our non-qualified deferred compensation plan, implemented in September 1999, provides an unfunded incentive compensation arrangement for eligible management and highly compensated employees. Participants may elect to defer up to 50% of their annual earnings with a minimum deferral of $2,000. Distributions can be paid out as short-term payments or at retirement. Retirement benefits can be paid out as a lump sum or in annual installments over a term of up to 15 years.
Total annual contributions from operating profits for these plans totaled $81.0 million in fiscal 2004, $83.4 million in fiscal 2003, and $64.7 million in fiscal 2002.
Stock-Based Compensation Plans
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
We maintain a qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) under which each
eligible employee may be granted an option to purchase shares of IGTs common
stock. The term of each option is 12 months and the exercise date is the last
day of the option period. Employees who have completed 90 days of service
prior to the beginning of the plan year are eligible. Employees who are 5% or
more shareholders and employees of certain subsidiaries are excluded.
Employees may participate in this plan through payroll deductions up to a
maximum of 10% of their base pay. The option price is equal to 85% of the
market value of the common stock on the date of grant or on the date of
exercise, whichever is less. As of September 30, 2004 an aggregate of 12.6
million shares have been authorized under our ESPP plan, of which 3.5 million
shares remained available for future grants at September 30, 2004. Based on
payroll contributions through September 2004, we expect to issue approximately
231,000 shares in fiscal 2005.
In January 1999, we made 1.2 million shares of common stock available under the Barcrest Savings Related Share Option Scheme (ShareSave). Eligible employees may enroll in ShareSave each year and must elect to vest over three, five, or seven years. The option price is equal to 80% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. Employees may contribute up to £3,000 (approximately $5,400) annually. At September 30, 2004 there were approximately 759,000 shares available for grant under this plan. Based on enrollment through September 2004, we expect to issue approximately 66,600 shares in fiscal 2005.
Stock Incentive Plan
Under the International Game Technology 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (SIP), our
eligible employees and non-employee directors may be granted non-qualified and
incentive options to purchase shares of common stock, stock appreciation
rights, restricted stock awards, or performance based share awards and stock
bonuses.
An employee option grant typically vests ratably over five years and allows the option holder to purchase stock over specified periods of time, generally 10 years from the date of grant, at a fixed price equal to the market value at the date of grant. At the date of acquisition, 8.8 million outstanding stock option shares under Anchors stock option plans were converted into options for IGTs common stock at the same terms and conditions as originally granted. The fair value of all converted options were included in the purchase price allocation and deferred compensation for the unvested portion was amortized over the remaining average 3-year service period. No options for additional shares may be granted under Anchor plans and any options cancelled under the Anchor plans may not be reissued.
Non-cash compensation for restricted stock awards, option modifications, and deferred compensation related to Anchors converted options totaled $2.0 million in fiscal 2004, $4.4 million in fiscal 2003 and $3.3 million in fiscal 2002.
71
A summary of SIP activity for the last three years is presented below.
Number | Weighted Average | Shares | ||||||||||
of Option Shares | Exercise Price | Available for | ||||||||||
Outstanding |
(per share) |
Grant |
||||||||||
Outstanding at September 30, 2001 |
18,931,636 | $ | 8.07 | 3,458,800 | ||||||||
Additional shares authorized |
| | 19,600,000 | |||||||||
Granted options |
6,510,800 | 16.58 | (6,510,800 | ) | ||||||||
Anchor acquisition options assumed |
8,850,332 | 7.00 | | |||||||||
Forfeited |
(269,080 | ) | 8.64 | 269,080 | ||||||||
Expired with new 2002 SIP |
| | (817,080 | ) | ||||||||
Exercised |
(10,166,676 | ) | 6.82 | | ||||||||
Outstanding at September 30, 2002 |
23,857,012 | 10.53 | 16,000,000 | |||||||||
Granted options |
5,188,600 | 20.09 | (5,188,600 | ) | ||||||||
Granted restricted stock awards |
420,000 | | (420,000 | ) | ||||||||
Forfeited |
(39,200 | ) | 6.87 | 39,200 | ||||||||
Expired |
(625,808 | ) | | | ||||||||
Exercised |
(5,870,677 | ) | 7.56 | | ||||||||
Outstanding at September 30, 2003 |
22,929,927 | 13.37 | 10,430,600 | |||||||||
Granted options |
7,245,900 | 34.58 | (7,245,900 | ) | ||||||||
Granted restricted stock awards |
155,600 | | (155,600 | ) | ||||||||
Forfeited |
(89,500 | ) | 23.48 | 89,500 | ||||||||
Expired |
(153,148 | ) | | | ||||||||
Exercised |
(4,182,549 | ) | 11.25 | | ||||||||
Outstanding at September 30, 2004 |
25,906,230 | $ | 19.54 | 3,118,600 | ||||||||
Options exercisable at September 30: |
||||||||||||
2002 |
6,135,100 | $ | 6.35 | |||||||||
2003 |
5,285,377 | 9.65 | ||||||||||
2004 |
6,985,594 | 12.14 |
The following table summarizes information for stock options outstanding and exercisable at September 30, 2004, assessing the number and timing of shares that may be issued and the cash that may be received as a result of options exercised.
Outstanding |
Exercisable |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Range of | Number | Remaining | Average | Number | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise Prices |
Outstanding |
Contractual Life |
Exercise Price |
Exercisable |
Exercise Price |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
$ 0.00 |
| $ | 11.25 | 6,280,316 | 4.91 | $ | 7.53 | 4,005,816 | $ | 8.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
11.28 |
| 17.08 | 5,496,515 | 6.71 | 13.86 | 1,405,918 | 14.02 | |||||||||||||||||||||
17.16 |
| 26.86 | 6,947,999 | 7.94 | 19.25 | 1,541,960 | 18.79 | |||||||||||||||||||||
27.33 |
| 46.82 | 7,181,400 | 9.29 | 34.67 | 31,900 | 28.53 | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ 0.00 |
| $ | 46.82 | 25,906,230 | 7.32 | $ | 19.54 | 6,985,594 | $ | 12.14 | ||||||||||||||||||
72
17. Related Party Transactions
Joint Ventures
We have placed certain recurring revenue games under joint venture agreements
with various gaming companies. Subsequent to the Anchor acquisition, we
consolidated our largest joint venture, Spin for Cash (JV). Prior to
consolidation, we recorded the JV activities under the equity method. As of
and for the three months ended December 2002, JV revenues totaled $127.1
million, expenses totaled $60.1 million, assets totaled $303.4 million and
liabilities totaled $173.9 million.
We recorded the following transactions with unconsolidated joint ventures as of and for the years ended:
September 30, |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Net earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
$ | | $ | | $ | 32,470 | ||||||
Asset and expense transfers |
| 152 | 9,109 | |||||||||
Capital contributions |
| 400 | 1,040 | |||||||||
Accounts receivable |
| 219 | 67 | |||||||||
Largest amount receivable during the year |
| 856 | 5,584 |
Other Related Parties
Our progressive jackpot systems in Iowa and New Jersey were included in fiscal
2002 and 2003, prior to consolidation as VIEs in fiscal 2004 under FIN 46.
During fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, a member of our board was a partner in a law firm that we retained as outside counsel. Two members of our board were also board members for certain IGT customers. We also design games under an expense sharing agreement with a distributor in the UK. We recorded the following transactions with these related parties:
Years ended September 30, |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 4,249 | $ | 63,963 | $ | 73,046 | ||||||
Expenses |
858 | 1,198 | 754 | |||||||||
Accounts receivable, net of payables |
164 | 10,176 | 15,538 | |||||||||
Largest net receivable during the year |
1,468 | 18,999 | 18,458 |
18. Business Segments
We design, develop, manufacture, distribute and sell computerized gaming machines and system products in all jurisdictions where gaming is legal. Our two primary revenue sources are product sales and gaming operations. We strive to maintain a diversified business strategy with our presence in most worldwide gaming markets and the breadth of our product offerings.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, we finalized changes to our organizational structure and management responsibilities to cover all products in distinct geographical areas. This reorganization included an evolving realignment of our sales organization, which began with the appointment of our new CEO in October 2003. The new structure shifted our focus to managing the business by customer regions encompassing all sources and types of revenues. Operating results reviewed by our chief decision makers encompass all sources of revenues within specific regions.
We currently view our business in two operating segments, each incorporating all relevant revenues from product sales and gaming operations:
ª | The North America Division encompasses our operations in the US and Canada, including the IGT Systems group | |||
ª | The International Division oversees our efforts abroad in Australia, New Zealand, Europe, Latin America, South Africa, the UK and Japan |
73
Our business segments are designed to allocate resources within a framework of management responsibility. Operating costs from one segment may benefit the other segments. We continually evaluate the alignment of our business development and sales organizations for reporting purposes, which may result in changes to segment allocations. Prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current management view and presentation.
The Corporate Division manages certain unallocated income and expenses related to company-wide initiatives, including capital deployment, treasury and cash management, as well as administrative and oversight functions, such as human resources, information systems, and legal. The Corporate Division includes all debt related costs, including interest and losses on early retirements, as well as interest income and gains or losses on investment securities, hedging instruments and other corporate assets.
On a consolidated basis we do not recognize inter-company revenues or expenses upon the transfer of gaming products between divisions. IGTs segment profit reflects income from continuing operations before tax. Segment depreciation and amortization reflects the total amount presented on the statements of cash flows.
Divisions |
||||||||||||||||
Years ended September 30, |
North America |
International |
Corporate |
Consolidated |
||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
2004 |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 2,137,098 | $ | 347,654 | $ | | $ | 2,484,752 | ||||||||
Product sales |
991,081 | 330,255 | | 1,321,336 | ||||||||||||
Gaming operations |
1,146,017 | 17,399 | | 1,163,416 | ||||||||||||
Inter-company revenues |
108,936 | 1,745 | | 110,681 | ||||||||||||
Gross Profit |
1,153,292 | 165,957 | | 1,319,249 | ||||||||||||
Product sales |
538,226 | 151,949 | | 690,175 | ||||||||||||
Gaming operations |
615,066 | 14,008 | | 629,074 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
838,257 | 81,236 | (105,169 | ) | 814,324 | |||||||||||
Segment profit (loss) |
859,550 | 83,407 | (289,541 | ) | 653,416 | |||||||||||
Segment profit margin |
40 | % | 24 | % | na | 26 | % | |||||||||
Interest income |
46,454 | 1,449 | 11,880 | 59,783 | ||||||||||||
Product sales |
16,687 | 1,449 | | 18,136 | ||||||||||||
Gaming operations |
29,767 | | | 29,767 | ||||||||||||
Unallocated |
| | 11,880 | 11,880 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
26,267 | 238 | 64,029 | 90,534 | ||||||||||||
Product sales |
140 | 238 | | 378 | ||||||||||||
Gaming operations |
26,127 | | | 26,127 | ||||||||||||
Unallocated |
| | 64,029 | 64,029 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
132,739 | 4,475 | 12,595 | 149,809 | ||||||||||||
Cost of product sales |
2,732 | 518 | | 3,250 | ||||||||||||
Cost of gaming operations |
80,393 | 1,833 | | 82,226 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
49,614 | 2,124 | 12,595 | 64,333 | ||||||||||||
Total assets |
2,923,744 | 224,440 | 724,780 | 3,872,964 | ||||||||||||
Additions to long-lived assets |
203,942 | 6,946 | | 210,888 |
74
Divisions |
||||||||||||||||
Years ended September 30, |
North America |
International |
Corporate |
Consolidated |
||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
2003 |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 1,890,094 | $ | 238,043 | $ | | $ | 2,128,137 | ||||||||
Product sales |
842,857 | 225,741 | | 1,068,598 | ||||||||||||
Gaming operations |
1,047,237 | 12,302 | | 1,059,539 | ||||||||||||
Inter-company revenues |
169,904 | 504 | | 170,408 | ||||||||||||
Gross Profit |
985,318 | 109,587 | | 1,094,905 | ||||||||||||
Product sales |
422,725 | 100,420 | | 523,145 | ||||||||||||
Gaming operations |
562,593 | 9,167 | | 571,760 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
722,142 | 50,035 | (106,235 | ) | 665,942 | |||||||||||
Segment profit (loss) |
740,826 | 55,867 | (198,149 | ) | 598,544 | |||||||||||
Segment profit margin |
39 | % | 23 | % | na | 28 | % | |||||||||
Interest income |
39,008 | 1,000 | 12,900 | 52,908 | ||||||||||||
Product sales |
13,274 | 1,000 | | 14,274 | ||||||||||||
Gaming operations |
25,734 | | | 25,734 | ||||||||||||
Unallocated |
| | 12,900 | 12,900 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
23,598 | 180 | 93,076 | 116,854 | ||||||||||||
Product sales |
646 | 180 | | 826 | ||||||||||||
Gaming operations |
22,952 | | | 22,952 | ||||||||||||
Unallocated |
| | 93,076 | 93,076 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
119,418 | 4,824 | 9,745 | 133,987 | ||||||||||||
Cost of product sales |
2,923 | 1,321 | | 4,244 | ||||||||||||
Cost of gaming operations |
82,195 | 848 | | 83,043 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
34,300 | 2,655 | 9,745 | 46,700 | ||||||||||||
Total assets |
2,628,846 | 163,456 | 1,392,929 | 4,185,231 | ||||||||||||
Additions to long-lived assets |
125,486 | 3,108 | | 128,594 | ||||||||||||
2002 |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 1,486,954 | $ | 241,558 | $ | | $ | 1,728,512 | ||||||||
Product sales |
614,818 | 231,262 | | 846,080 | ||||||||||||
Gaming operations |
872,136 | 10,296 | | 882,432 | ||||||||||||
Inter-company revenues |
106,509 | 1,774 | | 108,283 | ||||||||||||
Gross Profit |
751,140 | 91,753 | | 842,893 | ||||||||||||
Product sales |
279,322 | 84,268 | | 363,590 | ||||||||||||
Gaming operations |
471,818 | 7,485 | | 479,303 | ||||||||||||
Earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
32,470 | | | 32,470 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
584,467 | 24,825 | (92,842 | ) | 516,450 | |||||||||||
Segment profit (loss) |
600,422 | 25,785 | (217,358 | ) | 408,849 | |||||||||||
Segment profit margin |
40 | % | 11 | % | na | 24 | % | |||||||||
Interest income |
39,959 | 1,994 | 8,470 | 50,423 | ||||||||||||
Product sales |
14,859 | 1,994 | | 16,853 | ||||||||||||
Gaming operations |
25,100 | | | 25,100 | ||||||||||||
Unallocated |
| | 8,470 | 8,470 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
21,969 | 143 | 93,909 | 116,021 | ||||||||||||
Product sales |
287 | 143 | | 430 | ||||||||||||
Gaming operations |
21,682 | | | 21,682 | ||||||||||||
Unallocated |
| | 93,909 | 93,909 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
117,503 | 4,629 | 9,357 | 131,489 | ||||||||||||
Cost of product sales |
3,120 | 885 | | 4,005 | ||||||||||||
Cost of gaming operations |
85,059 | 1,138 | | 86,197 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
29,324 | 2,606 | 9,357 | 41,287 | ||||||||||||
Total assets |
2,605,506 | 154,515 | 555,797 | 3,315,818 | ||||||||||||
Additions to long-lived assets |
113,833 | 2,332 | | 116,165 |
75
19. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
Years ended September 30, |
First |
Second |
Third |
Fourth |
||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amount and stock prices) | ||||||||||||||||
2004 |
||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 608,061 | $ | 636,084 | $ | 618,887 | $ | 621,720 | ||||||||
Gross profit |
321,066 | 339,109 | 338,257 | 320,817 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
202,243 | 206,012 | 211,082 | 194,987 | ||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
116,658 | 117,684 | 141,102 | 54,309 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
176,324 | 116,942 | 141,102 | 54,309 | ||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.50 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.15 | ||||||||
Stock price |
||||||||||||||||
High |
$ | 36.96 | $ | 45.78 | $ | 46.82 | $ | 38.17 | ||||||||
Low |
$ | 28.09 | $ | 34.65 | $ | 33.45 | $ | 28.72 | ||||||||
2003(2) |
||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 489,632 | $ | 529,088 | $ | 561,921 | $ | 547,496 | ||||||||
Gross profit |
247,331 | 269,943 | 279,043 | 298,588 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
150,054 | 160,052 | 173,563 | 182,273 | ||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
84,747 | 89,020 | 99,886 | 101,639 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
91,587 | 87,114 | 103,685 | 108,341 | ||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share(1) |
$ | 0.26 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.31 | ||||||||
Stock price(1) |
||||||||||||||||
High |
$ | 19.82 | $ | 21.80 | $ | 25.38 | $ | 28.87 | ||||||||
Low |
$ | 16.31 | $ | 18.52 | $ | 19.68 | $ | 24.50 | ||||||||
2002 (2) |
||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 301,493 | $ | 461,286 | $ | 483,619 | $ | 482,114 | ||||||||
Gross profit |
136,402 | 227,902 | 235,990 | 242,599 | ||||||||||||
Earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates |
33,865 | (748 | ) | (345 | ) | (302 | ) | |||||||||
Operating income |
97,790 | 132,015 | 142,771 | 143,874 | ||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
51,790 | 70,328 | 78,420 | 54,174 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
51,790 | 73,900 | 82,628 | 62,847 | ||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share(1) |
$ | 0.18 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.18 | ||||||||
Stock price(1) |
||||||||||||||||
High |
$ | 17.76 | $ | 17.52 | $ | 16.11 | $ | 17.52 | ||||||||
Low |
$ | 10.28 | $ | 15.20 | $ | 13.44 | $ | 12.39 |
(1) | Stock price and per share amounts for all periods presented have been adjusted to reflect the four-for-one stock split effected June 18, 2003. | |||
(2) | Certain operations acquired with Anchor that were not a strategic fit with IGTs core business strategy were sold or held for sale, and therefore reclassified to discontinued operations for all periods presented. |
76
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Not applicable
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified
in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and
procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter
how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of
achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily is
required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of
possible controls and procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that IGTs disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
No change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter just ended that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Changes in Internal
Controls
As a part of our normal operations, we update our internal controls as
necessary to accommodate any modifications to our business processes or
accounting procedures. There have not been any other changes in our internal
controls or in other factors that materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect these controls as of the end of the period covered
by this report. There were no significant deficiencies or material
weaknesses, and therefore no corrective actions were taken.
Item 9B. Other Information
On November 9, 2004, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors approved a discretionary Management Bonus Plan amount in which executive officers of the Company may participate. The award formulae are generally based on overall operating income growth and individual performance goals. A summary description of the plan is filed as Exhibit 10.20 of this report.
77
Part III
The information required by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, except as provided below, is incorporated by reference from the Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
We have adopted the International Game Technology Code of Ethics for Executive and Financial Officers (the finance code of ethics), a code of ethics that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Controller and other finance organization employees. The finance code of ethics is publicly available on our website at www.IGT.com. If we make any substantive amendments to the finance code of ethics or grant any waiver, including any implicit waiver, from a provision of the code to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or Corporate Controller, we will disclose the nature of such amendment or waiver on that website.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Equity compensation plans approved and not approved by shareholders as of September 30, 2004
Number of securities | ||||||||||||
Number of securities to | Weighted average | remaining available for | ||||||||||
be issued upon exercise | exercised price of | future issuance under | ||||||||||
of outstanding options, | outstanding options, | equity compensation | ||||||||||
Plan category |
warrants, and rights |
warrants and rights |
plans |
|||||||||
Equity compensation plans
approved by shareholders (1) |
25,906,230 | $ | 19.54 | 6,613,271 | ||||||||
Equity compensation plans
not approved by shareholders (2) |
196,726 | 16.57 | 759,026 | |||||||||
Total |
26,102,956 | $ | 19.52 | 7,372,297 | ||||||||
(1) | Includes the International Game Technology 2002 Stock Incentive Plan and 964,647 shares under the 1987 Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan. | |||
(2) | Includes shares available under the Barcrest Savings Related Share Option Scheme (ShareSave) established in January 1999. ShareSave is a broad-based employee stock purchase program available to certain UK employees, designed to satisfy certain tax requirements under applicable UK tax law. ShareSave is generally intended to replicate for our UK employees the same incentives that are made available to our US employees through our Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Shareholder approval for ShareSave was not required. |
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
78
Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)(1) | Consolidated Financial Statements: | |||||||
Reference is made to the Index to Financial Statements and Related Information under Item 8 in Part II hereof where these documents are listed. | ||||||||
(a)(2) | Consolidated Financial Statement Schedule: | Page | ||||||
II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts | 82 | |||||||
Other financial statement schedules are either not required or the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes thereto. | ||||||||
Parent Company Financial Statements - Financial Statements of the Registrant only are omitted under Rule 3-05 as modified by ASR 302. | ||||||||
(a)(3) | Exhibits: | |||||||
3.1 | Articles of Incorporation of International Game Technology, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrants Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1995) | |||||||
3.2 | First amendment to Bylaws of International Game Technology dated May 5, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrants Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 30, 2002) | |||||||
3.2A | Second amendment to Second Restated Code of Bylaws of International Game Technology, dated March 4, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Registrants Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 30, 2002) | |||||||
4.1 | Indenture, dated as of May 19, 1999 by and between International Game Technology and The Bank of New York (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Registration Statement No. 333-81257, Form S-4 filed by Registrant) | |||||||
4.2 | Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of May 11, 1999, by and among International Game Technology, Salomon Smith Barney Inc., BNY Capital Markets, Inc., Goldman, Sachs & Co., Lehman Brothers Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Registration Statement No. 333-81257, Form S-4 filed by Registrant) | |||||||
4.3 | Indenture dated as of January 29, 2003 between IGT, any subsidiary that becomes a party thereto, and the Bank of New York, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-103339), as filed by Registrant on February 20, 2003) | |||||||
4.4 | Form of Zero-Coupon Convertible Debentures (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-103339), as filed by Registrant on February 20, 2003) | |||||||
4.5 | Registration Rights Agreement dated as of January 29, 2003 between IGT and Goldman, Sachs & Co., as the Initial Purchaser (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-103339), as filed by Registrant on February 20, 2003) | |||||||
10.1* | Stock Option Plan for Key Employees of International Game Technology, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to Registration Statement No. 33-12610 filed by Registrant) | |||||||
10.2* | Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Proxy Statement for the 1998 Annual Meeting of Shareholders) | |||||||
10.3* | Employment Agreement with Robert A. Bittman, Executive Vice President, Product Development dated March 12, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Registrants Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1996) | |||||||
10.4* | Form of officers and directors indemnification agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Registrants Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1996) | |||||||
10.5 | Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among International Game Technology, The Bank of New York, Wells Fargo and other banks, dated August 10, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5E to Registrants Report on Form 10K for the year ended September 30, 2001) | |||||||
10.6 | Facility Agreement between I.G.T. (Australia) Pty. Limited and National Australia Bank Limited, dated March 18, 1998; guarantee from International Game Technology to National Australia Bank Limited, dated March 18, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Registrants Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998) |
79
10.7 | Amendment Notes between Silver Club and CMS-El Capitan and International Game Technology dated November 5, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Registrants Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 2, 1999) | |||||||
10.8 | Barcrest Savings Related Share Option Scheme (incorporated by reference to Registration Statement No. 333-94349, Form S-8 filed by Registrant on January 10, 2000) | |||||||
10.9* | IGT Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Registrants Report on Form 10K/A for the year ended September 30, 2000) | |||||||
10.10* | International Game Technology 1993 Stock Option Plan (Amended and Restated Effective as of August 27, 1996) (Composite Plan Document Incorporating Amendments 1998-I, 1998-II and 2000-I)(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Registrants Report on Form 10Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2001) | |||||||
10.11* | International Game Technology 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 30, 2002) | |||||||
10.12* | IGT Profit Sharing Plan (As Amended and Restated as of April 1, 2002) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 to Registrants Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 28, 2002) | |||||||
10.13* | Employment Agreement with Maureen Mullarkey, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer dated January 27, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 to Registrants Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 29, 2003) | |||||||
10.14 | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 29, 2003, by and among International Game Technology, NWAC Corporation, and Acres Gaming (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K, File number 001-10684, filing date June 29, 2003) | |||||||
10.15* | Employment Agreement with G. Thomas Baker, Chairman of the Board of Directors, dated October 27, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Registrants Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2003) | |||||||
10.16* | Employment Agreement with Thomas J. Matthews, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Operating Officer dated October 27, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Registrants Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2003) | |||||||
10.17* | IGT 2002 Stock Incentive Plan Agreement Forms: Director Stock Option Agreement; Incentive Stock Option Agreement; Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement; Restricted Stock Award Agreement; UK Stock Option Sub-Plan (the UK Sub-Plan) Option Agreement | |||||||
10.18* | Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Amended and Restated effective as of March 1, 1999) (Composite Plan Document Reflecting July 2003 Stock Split and December 2003 Amendment) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Proxy Statement for the 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders) | |||||||
10.19 | Credit agreement by and among International Game Technology, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A. and other banks dated July 1, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 to Registrants Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004) | |||||||
10.20* | Summary of IGT Management Bonus Plan | |||||||
21 | Subsidiaries | |||||||
23 | Independent Auditors Consent | |||||||
24 | Power of Attorney (see page 81 hereof) | |||||||
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |||||||
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |||||||
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(b) of the Exchange Act and section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |||||||
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(b) of the Exchange Act and section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |||||||
* | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement |
80
POWER OF ATTORNEY SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 10th day of December 2004.
International Game Technology |
||||
By: | /s/ Maureen T. Mullarkey | |||
Maureen T. Mullarkey | ||||
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer |
||||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Each person whose signature appears below hereby authorizes Thomas J. Matthews and Maureen T. Mullarkey, or either of them, as attorneys-in-fact to sign on their behalf, individually, and in each capacity stated below, and to file all amendments and/or supplements to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Signature
|
Title | Date |
/s/ G. Thomas Baker
G. Thomas Baker |
Chairman of the Board of Directors | December 10, 2004 | ||
/s/ Thomas J. Matthews
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director | December 10, 2004 | ||
Thomas J. Matthews |
||||
/s/ Maureen T. Mullarkey
Maureen T. Mullarkey |
Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, Finance (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer), and Treasurer | December 10, 2004 | ||
/s/ Neil Barsky |
Director | December 10, 2004 | ||
Neil Barsky |
||||
/s/ Robert A. Bittman
|
Director | December 10, 2004 | ||
Robert A. Bittman |
||||
/s/ Richard Burt |
Director | December 10, 2004 | ||
Richard Burt |
||||
/s/ Leslie Heisz Leslie Heisz |
Director | December 10, 2004 | ||
/s/ Robert A. Mathewson
Robert A. Mathewson |
Director | December 10, 2004 | ||
/s/ Robert Miller Robert Miller |
Director | December 10, 2004 | ||
/s/ Frederick Rentschler Frederick Rentschler |
Director | December 10, 2004 |
81
SCHEDULE II Consolidated Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Net change | ||||||||||||||||
Beginning | in unrealized | Ending | ||||||||||||||
Balance |
Provisions |
gain / loss |
Balance |
|||||||||||||
(In
thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
Valuation allowance for unrealized gain
(loss) on investment securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Year ended 09/30/02 |
$ | (1,578 | ) | $ | | $ | 1,304 | $ | (274 | ) | ||||||
Year ended 09/30/03 |
$ | (274 | ) | $ | | $ | 520 | $ | 246 | |||||||
Year ended 09/30/04 |
$ | 246 | $ | | $ | 59 | $ | 305 | ||||||||
Write-offs | ||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Net of | Ending | ||||||||||||||
Balance |
Provisions |
Recoveries |
Balance |
|||||||||||||
(In
thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts: |
||||||||||||||||
Year ended 09/30/02 |
$ | 15,944 | $ | 94 | $ | 2,034 | $ | 18,072 | ||||||||
Year ended 09/30/03 |
$ | 18,072 | $ | 8,960 | $ | (6,087 | ) | $ | 20,945 | |||||||
Year ended 09/30/04 |
$ | 20,945 | $ | 10,590 | $ | (5,471 | ) | $ | 26,064 | |||||||
Allowance for doubtful notes
and contracts receivable: |
||||||||||||||||
Year ended 09/30/02 |
$ | 26,941 | $ | 17,938 | $ | (7,751 | ) | $ | 37,128 | |||||||
Year ended 09/30/03 |
$ | 37,128 | $ | 5,614 | $ | (8,704 | ) | $ | 34,038 | |||||||
Year ended 09/30/04 |
$ | 34,038 | $ | 7,585 | $ | 755 | $ | 42,378 | ||||||||
82
Exhibit Index
10.17*
|
IGT 2002 Stock Incentive Plan Agreement Forms: Director Stock Option Agreement; Incentive Stock Option Agreement; Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement; Restricted Stock Award Agreement; UK Stock Option Sub-Plan (the UK Sub-Plan) Option Agreement | |
10.20*
|
Summary of IGT Management Bonus Plan | |
21
|
Subsidiaries | |
23
|
Independent Auditors Consent | |
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(b) of the Exchange Act and section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(b) of the Exchange Act and section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement