Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ý | |||
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o |
|||
Check the appropriate box: |
|||
o |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
||
o |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
||
ý |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
||
o |
Definitive Additional Materials |
||
o |
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
Black Hills Corporation |
||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
||||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): | ||||
ý |
No fee required. |
|||
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|||
(5) | Total fee paid: |
|||
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|||
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|||
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|||
(3) | Filing Party: |
|||
(4) | Date Filed: |
BLACK HILLS CORPORATION
Notice of 2009
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and Proxy Statement
625 Ninth Street
Rapid City, South Dakota 57701
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
MAY 19, 2009
April 7, 2009
Dear Shareholder:
You are invited to attend the annual meeting of shareholders of Black Hills Corporation to be held on Tuesday, May 19, 2009 at 9:30 a.m., local time, at the Dahl Arts Center, 713 Seventh Street, Rapid City, South Dakota. The purpose of our annual meeting is to consider and take action on the following:
The enclosed proxy statement discusses the important matters to be considered at this year's meeting. Our common shareholders of record as of March 31, 2009 can vote at the annual meeting.
Your vote is very important. You may vote your shares by telephone, by the Internet or by returning the enclosed proxy. If you own shares of common stock other than the shares shown on the enclosed proxy, you will receive a proxy in a separate envelope for each such holding. Please vote each proxy received. To make sure that your vote is counted if voting by mail, you should allow enough time for the postal service to deliver your proxy before the meeting.
|
Sincerely, | |
|
||
|
ROXANN R. BASHAM Vice PresidentGovernance and Corporate Secretary |
625 Ninth Street
Rapid City, South Dakota 57701
PROXY STATEMENT
A proxy in the accompanying form is solicited by the Board of Directors of Black Hills Corporation, a South Dakota corporation, to be voted at the annual meeting of our shareholders to be held Tuesday, May 19, 2009, and at any adjournment of the annual meeting.
The enclosed form of proxy, when executed and returned, will be voted as set forth therein. Any shareholder signing a proxy has the power to revoke the proxy in writing, addressed to our secretary, or in person at the meeting at any time before the proxy is exercised.
We will bear all costs of the solicitation. In addition to solicitation by mail, our officers and employees may solicit proxies by telephone, fax, or in person. We have retained Georgeson Inc. to assist us in the solicitation of proxies at an anticipated cost of $6,500 plus out-of-pocket expenses. Also, we will, upon request, reimburse brokers or other persons holding stock in their names or in the names of their nominees for reasonable expenses in forwarding proxies and proxy materials to the beneficial owners of stock.
This proxy statement and the accompanying form of proxy are to be first mailed on or about April 7, 2009. Our 2008 annual report to shareholders is being mailed to shareholders with this proxy statement.
VOTING RIGHTS AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS
Only our shareholders of record at the close of business on March 31, 2009, will be entitled to vote at the meeting. Our outstanding voting stock as of such record date consisted of 38,791,281 shares of our common stock.
Each outstanding share of our common stock is entitled to one vote. Cumulative voting is permitted in the election of our Board of Directors. Each share is entitled to three votes, one each for the election of three directors, and the three votes may be cast for a single person or may be distributed among two or three persons.
COMMONLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE
ANNUAL MEETING PROCESS
Q: Who is soliciting my proxy?
Q: Where and when is the annual meeting?
Q: What am I voting on?
A: | | Election of three directors in Class III: David C. Ebertz, John R. Howard and Stephen D. Newlin. | ||
|
Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2009. |
Q: Who can vote?
Q: How do I vote?
You may be able to vote by telephone or the Internet if your shares are held in the name of a bank or broker. If this is the case, you will need to follow their instructions.
If we receive your signed proxy before the annual meeting, we will vote your shares as you direct. You can specify on your proxy whether your shares should be voted for all, some or none of the nominees for directors. You can also specify whether you approve, disapprove or abstain from the other proposal.
If you do not mark any sections, your proxy card will be voted:
You have the right to revoke your proxy any time before the meeting by:
1
Q: Who will count the vote?
Q: What constitutes a quorum?
Q: What vote is needed for these proposals to be adopted?
The appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year 2009 will be ratified if a majority of the shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote on the item, vote in favor.
A properly executed proxy marked "Abstain" with respect to the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche as our independent registered public accounting firm has the effect of a negative, or "no" vote.
If you hold your shares in "street name" through a broker or nominee, your broker or nominee may not be permitted to exercise voting discretion with respect to some of the matters to be acted upon. Thus, if you do not give your broker or nominee specific instructions, your shares may not be voted on those matters and will not be counted in determining the number of shares necessary for approval. Shares represented by such "broker non-votes" will, however, be counted in determining whether there is a quorum.
Q: Is cumulative voting permitted for the election of directors?
If you choose to cumulate your votes, you will need to submit a proxy card or a ballot and make an explicit statement of your intent to cumulate your votes, either by indicating in writing on the proxy card or by indicating in writing on your ballot when voting at the annual meeting. If you hold shares beneficially in street name and wish to cumulate votes, you should contact your broker, trustee or nominee.
2
Q: What should I do now?
Q: Who conducts the proxy solicitation and how much will it cost?
Q: Can I revoke my proxy?
Q: How will my shares be voted if they are held in a broker's name?
Q: What happens if I do not give my broker instructions?
Q: Who should I call with questions?
Q: When are the shareholder proposals for the annual meeting held in 2010 due?
A shareholder who intends to submit a proposal for consideration, but not for inclusion in our proxy materials, must provide written notice to our Corporate Secretary in accordance with Article I, Section 9 of our Bylaws. In general, our Bylaws provide that the written notice must be delivered not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of shareholders. Our 2009 annual meeting is scheduled for May 19, 2009. Ninety days prior to the first anniversary of this date will be February 18, 2010, and 120 days prior to the first anniversary of this date will be January 19, 2010.
3
Proposal 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
In accordance with our Bylaws and Article VI of our Articles of Incorporation, members of our Board of Directors are elected to three classes of staggered terms consisting of three years each. At this annual meeting of our shareholders, three directors will be elected to Class III of the Board of Directors to hold office for a term of three years until our annual meeting of shareholders in 2012, and until their respective successors shall be duly elected and qualified in accordance with the Company's Bylaws.
All three nominees for directors are presently members of our Board of Directors. The proxy attorneys will vote your stock for the election of the three nominees for directors, unless otherwise instructed. If, at the time of the meeting, any of such nominees shall be unable to serve in the capacity for which they are nominated or for good cause will not serve, an event which the Board of Directors does not anticipate, it is the intention of the persons designated as proxy attorneys to vote, at their discretion, for such nominees as the Governance Committee may recommend and the Board of Directors may propose to replace those who are unable to serve. The affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes cast at the meeting is required for the election of the nominees to the Board of Directors.
The following information, including principal occupation or employment for the past five or more years, is furnished with respect to each of the following persons who are nominated as Class III Directors, each to serve for a term of three years to expire in 2012.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election of the following nominees:
Nominees for Election Until
2012 Annual
MeetingClass III
Name, Age, Principal Occupation for Last Five Years and Other Public Directorships
|
Director Since | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
David C. Ebertz, 63 |
1998 | |||
John R. Howard, 68 |
1977 |
|||
Stephen D. Newlin, 56 |
2004 |
4
Directors Whose Terms Expire at
2010 Annual MeetingClass I
Name, Age, Principal Occupation for Last Five Years and Other Public Directorships
|
Director Since | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Jack W. Eugster, 63 |
2004 | |||
Gary L. Pechota, 59 |
2007 |
|||
Thomas J. Zeller, 61 |
1997 |
Directors Whose Terms Expire at
2011 Annual MeetingClass II
Name, Age, Principal Occupation for Last Five Years and Other Public Directorships
|
Director Since | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
David R. Emery, 46 |
2004 | |||
Kay S. Jorgensen, 58 |
1992 |
|||
Warren L. Robinson, 58 |
2007 |
|||
John B. Vering, 59 |
2005 |
5
Corporate Governance Guidelines. Our Board of Directors has adopted corporate governance guidelines titled "Corporate Governance Guidelines of the Board of Directors" which set the tone for operation of our Board and assist the Board in fulfilling its obligations to shareholders and other constituencies. The guidelines lay the foundation for the Board's responsibilities, operations, leadership, organization and committee matters. The Governance Committee reviews the guidelines annually, and the guidelines may be amended at any time, upon recommendation by the Governance Committee and approval of the Board.
Board Independence. In accordance with New York Stock Exchange rules, the Board of Directors through its Governance Committee affirmatively determines the independence of each director and director nominee in accordance with guidelines it has adopted, which include all elements of independence set forth in the New York Stock Exchange listing standards. These guidelines are contained in our Policy for Director Independence, which can be found in the "Governance" section of our website (www.blackhillscorp.com/corpgov.htm). Based on these standards, the Governance Committee determined that each of the following nonemployee directors is independent and has no relationship with the Company, except as a director and shareholder of the Company:
David C. Ebertz | Jack W. Eugster | John R. Howard | ||
Kay S. Jorgensen | Stephen D. Newlin | Gary L. Pechota | ||
Warren L. Robinson | John B. Vering | Thomas J. Zeller |
In addition, based on such standards, the Governance Committee determined that Mr. Emery is not independent because he is our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (the "CEO").
Presiding Director and Executive Sessions. The Board has a Presiding Director position that is named annually. Kay S. Jorgensen has been serving as our Presiding Director since May 2006. The responsibilities of Presiding Director, as provided in the Board's Governance Guidelines, are to chair executive sessions of the non-management directors and communicate the Board's annual evaluation of the CEO. The Presiding Director, together with the non-management directors, establishes the agenda for executive sessions, which are held at the end of each regular Board meeting. The Presiding Director serves as a liaison between the non-management members of the Board and the CEO, and discusses, to the extent appropriate, matters discussed by the non-management directors in executive session. The Presiding Director also presides over regular meetings of the Board in the absence of the Chairman.
Director Nominees. The Governance Committee utilizes a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating nominees for director. The Committee regularly assesses the appropriate size of the Board, and whether any vacancies on the Board are expected due to retirement or otherwise. In the event vacancies are anticipated, or otherwise arise, the Committee considers various potential candidates for director. Board candidates are considered based upon various criteria, including diverse business, administrative and professional skills or experiences; an understanding of relevant industries, technologies and markets; financial literacy; independence status; the ability and willingness to contribute time and special competence to Board activities; personal integrity and independent judgment; and a commitment to enhancing shareholder value. The Committee considers these and other factors as it deems appropriate, given the current needs of the Board and the Company. The Committee considers candidates for Board membership suggested by a variety of sources, including current or past Board members, members of management and shareholders. There are no differences in the manner by which the Committee evaluates director candidates recommended by shareholders from those recommended by other sources. The Committee has also retained a third-party executive search firm at times to identify candidates.
6
Shareholders who intend to nominate persons for election to the Board of Directors must provide timely written notice of the nomination in accordance with Article I, Section 9 of our Bylaws. Generally, our Corporate Secretary must receive the written notice at our executive offices at P.O. Box 1400, 625 Ninth Street, Rapid City, South Dakota, 57709, not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of shareholders. The notice must set forth at a minimum the information set forth in Article I, Section 9 of our Bylaws, including the shareholder's identity and status, contingent ownership interests, description of any agreement made with others acting in concert with respect to the nomination, specific information about the nominee and supply certain representations by the nominee to the Company.
Communications with the Board. Shareholders and others interested in communicating directly with the Presiding Director, with the non-management directors as a group, or the Board of Directors may do so in writing to the Presiding Director, Black Hills Corporation, P.O. Box 1400, 625 Ninth Street, Rapid City, South Dakota, 57709.
Corporate Governance Documents. The charters of the Audit, Compensation, Executive and Governance committees, as well as the Board's Corporate Governance Guidelines, Policy for Director Independence, Code of Business Conduct and the Code of Ethics that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Controller, and certain other persons performing similar functions can be found in the "Governance" section of our website (www.blackhillscorp.com/corpgov.htm). Copies may also be obtained upon request from our Corporate Secretary. Please note that none of the information contained on our website is incorporated by reference in this proxy statement.
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions. We recognize related party transactions can present potential or actual conflicts of interest and create the appearance that decisions are based on considerations other than the best interests of the Company and our shareholders. Accordingly, as a general matter, it is our preference to avoid related party transactions. Nevertheless, we recognize that there are situations where related party transactions may be in, or may not be inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and our shareholders, including but not limited to situations where we may obtain products or services of a nature, quantity or quality, or on other terms, that are not readily available from alternative sources or when we provide products or services to related parties on an arm's length basis on terms comparable to those provided to unrelated third parties or on terms comparable to those provided to employees generally. Therefore, our Board of Directors has adopted a policy for the review of related party transactions. This policy requires directors and officers to promptly report to our Vice PresidentGovernance all proposed or existing transactions in which the Company and they, or persons related to them, are parties or participants. Our Vice PresidentGovernance presents to our Governance Committee those transactions that may require disclosure pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K (typically, those transactions that exceed $120,000). Our Governance Committee reviews the material facts presented and either approves or disapproves entry into the transaction. In reviewing the transaction, the Governance Committee considers the following factors, among other factors it deems appropriate: (i) whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third-party under the same or similar circumstances; (ii) the extent of the related party's interest in the transaction; and (iii) the impact on a director's independence in the event the related party is a director, an immediate family member of a director or an entity in which a director is a partner, shareholder or executive officer.
We offer a relocation program through a third-party relocation company for employees who relocate at the Company's request and, in appropriate circumstances, to new employees who relocate in connection with their employment by the Company. We believe this program offers a valuable incentive to attract and retain key employees. Our program covers the cost of most of the reasonable expenses associated with relocation, including, but not limited to, disposition of current residence, home finding, temporary living and transportation and storage of household goods. For our executives, the relocation
7
program includes a buyout provision for the pre-move residence. The relocation company manages the home sale process, including purchasing the home at either an appraised market value or at the value offered by a bona fide third-party purchaser and reselling the home. The Company is responsible for any costs associated with the subsequent maintenance and sale of the home, including the payment of a service fee to the relocation company. In October 2008, in connection with the hiring of Scott Buchholz as our Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer, the relocation company purchased Mr. Buchholz's home for $245,000. The relocation company sold Mr. Buchholz's home in November 2008 at the $245,000 purchase price. In November 2008, in connection with the hiring of Anthony Cleberg as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"), the relocation company purchased Mr. Cleberg's home for $627,500. The relocation company had not sold Mr. Cleberg's home as of March 11, 2009.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance. Based solely upon a review of our records and copies of reports on Form 3, 4 and 5 furnished to us, we believe that during and with respect to 2008, all persons subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, filed the required reports on a timely basis, except for the Form 4s for certain officers, including Garner Anderson, Roxann Basham, David Emery, Linden Evans, Steven Helmers, Maurice Klefeker, Perry Krush, James Mattern, Thomas Ohlmacher and Kyle White, reporting the issuance of shares under the Performance Share Plan for the performance period ending December 31, 2007 were reported two days late.
MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD
The Board of Directors
Our directors review and approve our strategic plan and oversee management of the Company. Our Board of Directors held 13 meetings during 2008. Directors' attendance at all Board and Committee meetings averaged 97 percent. During 2008, every director attended at least 75 percent of the combined total of Board meetings and Committee meetings on which the director served. Each regularly scheduled meeting of the Board includes an executive session of only non-management directors. We encourage our directors to attend the annual shareholders' meeting. All 10 directors were in attendance at the 2008 annual meeting of shareholders.
Committees of the Board
Our Board has four standing committees to facilitate and assist the Board in the execution of its responsibilities. The committees are currently the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Governance Committee and the Executive Committee. In accordance with the New York Stock Exchange listing standards and our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Audit, Compensation and Governance Committees are comprised solely of non-employee, independent directors. Each committee operates under a charter which is available on our website at www.blackhillscorp.com/corpgov.htm and is also available in print to any shareholder who requests it.
8
Members of the Committees are designated by our directors upon recommendation of the Governance Committee. The table below shows current membership for each of the Board committees.
Audit Committee | Compensation Committee | Governance Committee | Executive Committee | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
John R. Howard | David C. Ebertz | David C. Ebertz | David C. Ebertz | |||
Warren L. Robinson | Jack W. Eugster* | Jack W. Eugster | David R. Emery* | |||
John B. Vering | Kay S. Jorgensen | John R. Howard* | John R. Howard | |||
Thomas J. Zeller* | Stephen D. Newlin | Stephen D. Newlin | Kay S. Jorgensen | |||
Gary L. Pechota | John B. Vering | Thomas J. Zeller |
Audit Committee. The Audit Committee held nine meetings in 2008. The Audit Committee's responsibilities, discussed in detail in its charter include, among other duties, the responsibility to:
In accordance with the rules of the NYSE, all of the members of the Audit Committee are financially literate. In addition, the Board determined that Messrs. Howard, Robinson, Vering and Zeller each have the requisite attributes of an "audit committee financial expert" as provided in regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and that such attributes were acquired through relevant education and/or experience.
Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee held seven meetings in 2008. The Compensation Committee's responsibilities, discussed in detail in its charter include, among other duties, the responsibility to:
9
The Compensation Committee has authority under its charter to retain and terminate compensation consultants, outside counsel and other advisors as the Committee may deem appropriate in its sole discretion. The Committee has sole authority to approve related fees and retention terms. The Committee may delegate any of its responsibilities to subcommittees as the Committee may deem appropriate in its sole discretion. The Committee engaged Towers Perrin, an independent consulting firm, to conduct an annual review of its 2008 total compensation program for executive officers and non-employee directors.
The Committee annually evaluates the CEO's performance in light of established goals and objectives, with input from the other independent directors. Based upon the Committee's evaluation and recommendation, the independent directors of the Board set the CEO's annual compensation, including salary, bonus, incentive and equity compensation and perquisites.
The CEO annually reviews the performance of each of our senior officers. He presents a summary of his evaluations of all of our senior officers to the Committee and thoroughly reviews the Chief Operating OfficerUtilities (the "COO-Utilities,") the Chief Operating OfficerNon-regulated Energy Group (the "COO-Non-regulated Energy") and the CFO evaluations with the Committee. Based upon the Committee's review and recommendation, the Board of Directors sets the annual compensation of the COO-Utilities, COO-Non-regulated Energy and CFO, including salary, bonus, incentive and equity compensation and perquisites.
The CEO also provides oversight of management's evaluations of our other officers. Senior officers assess performance of all officers reporting to them. Based upon these performance reviews, market analysis conducted by the compensation consultant and discussions with our Chief Human Resources Officer and Human Resources department staff, the CEO recommends the compensation of the officers to the Committee. The Committee may exercise its discretion in modifying any of the recommended compensation and award levels in its review and approval process.
More information describing the Compensation Committee's processes and procedures for considering and determining executive compensation, including the role of our CEO and consultants in determining or recommending the amount or form of executive compensation, is included in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
In setting non-employee director compensation, the Compensation Committee recommends the form and amount of compensation to the Board of Directors and the Board of Directors makes the final determination. In considering and recommending the compensation of non-employee directors, the Compensation Committee considers such factors as it deems appropriate, including historical compensation information, level of compensation necessary to attract and retain non-employee directors meeting our desired qualifications and market data. In the review of director compensation for 2008, the Compensation Committee retained Towers Perrin to provide market information on non-employee director compensation, including annual board and committee retainers, board and committee meeting fees, committee chairperson fees, number of Board meetings and stock based compensation.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation. The Compensation Committee is comprised entirely of independent directors.
10
Governance Committee. The Governance Committee held four meetings in 2008. The Governance Committee's responsibilities, discussed in detail in its charter include, among other duties, the responsibility to:
Executive Committee. The Executive Committee acts upon specific authorization by the Board of Directors in the interval between Board meetings. The Executive Committee held two meetings in 2008.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Introduction
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis is designed to provide shareholders with a better understanding of our compensation philosophy, core principles and decision-making process. It explains the compensation-related actions taken with respect to 2008 compensation for our executive officers included in the Summary Compensation Table (our "Named Executive Officers"). Our Named Executive Officers, based on 2008 positions and compensation levels, are:
Mark T. Thies served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer until January 18, 2008. The compensation Mr. Thies received is disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table. He did not participate in our annual or long-term incentive plans in 2008. Consequently, the references to Named Executive Officers in this analysis do not apply to Mr. Thies.
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Committee," for purposes of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis) is composed entirely of independent directors and is responsible for approving and overseeing our executive compensation philosophy, policies and programs. The Committee has a written executive compensation philosophy which details the objectives of our executive compensation program. The Committee begins its executive compensation review process each year by reviewing and discussing its compensation philosophy.
11
Compensation Program Objectives. Our long-term success depends on our ability to operate effectively and efficiently, offering reliable service to our customers and investing wisely for present and future success. To achieve these goals, we must attract, motivate, and retain highly talented individuals. For these reasons, the Committee seeks to promote an executive compensation program that supports the overall objective of enhancing shareholder value and is based on principles designed to:
Overall, our goal is to provide total direct compensation (the sum of base salary, annual bonus and long-term incentives) at the median of the appropriate market when our operating results approximate average performance in relation to our peers. Individual executive's compensation may vary from the median based on such factors as individual skills, experience, contribution and performance, historic compensation, internal equity, retention concerns and other factors relevant to the individual executive. Our executives' actual direct compensation should vary significantly based on how actual performance varies from average or target results.
Our executive compensation is designed to maintain an appropriate and competitive balance between fixed and variable pay elements, short- and long-term compensation, and cash as well as stock-based compensation. We believe that the performance basis for determining compensation should differ by each reward elementbase salary, annual bonus and long-term incentive compensation.
Incentive measures (short- and long-term) should emphasize objective, quantitative operating measures. The Committee retains the right to positively or negatively adjust incentive payments based on their subjective evaluation of performance, including the materiality of certain extraordinary events.
Setting Executive Compensation
Based upon this compensation philosophy, the Committee structures our executive compensation to motivate our officers to achieve specified business goals and to reward them for achieving such goals.
The key steps the Committee follows in setting executive compensation are to:
Market Compensation Analysis
The market for our senior executive talent is national in scope and is not focused on any one geographic location, area or region of the country. As such, our executive compensation should be competitive with the national market place for senior executives. It should also reflect the executive's responsibilities and duties and be aligned with the pay of executives at companies or business units of comparable size and complexity. Beginning in 2008, the Committee changed the market benchmarks for
12
our corporate executives from the general and diversified energy industry to the utility and energy industry, recognizing the significant impact our regulated utility operations will have in the future with the July 2008 acquisition from Aquila of its electric utility in Colorado and gas utilities in Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska and Iowa.
The Committee selects and retains the services of an independent consulting firm to:
The Committee used the services of Towers Perrin for evaluating 2008 compensation. Towers Perrin gathered data from both nationally recognized survey providers, as well as specific peer companies through public filings, which included:
The twenty peer companies ranged in revenue size from approximately $750 million to nearly $4 billion with the median at $1.5 billion. This is the same peer group that the Committee chose for the January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2010 Performance Period of our Performance Share Program. The companies included in the peer group are disclosed under Long-Term IncentivePerformance Shares. The published survey data were adjusted for our 2007 revenue of $697 million and forecasted post-Aquila acquisition revenue of $1.6 billion using a statistical technique known as single regression analysis.
The salary surveys are one of several inputs into the Committee's decisions regarding appropriate compensation levels. Other factors include company performance, individual performance, the level and nature of responsibilities, and discussions with the CEO, Chief Human Resources Officer and Human Resources department staff.
Components of Executive Compensation
The components of our executive compensation program consist of a base salary, an annual incentive plan, and a long-term incentive award program. In addition, we provide income for our officers' retirement and other benefits.
An important component of the total compensation is derived from incentive compensation. Incentive compensation is intended to motivate and encourage our executives to drive performance and achieve superior results for our shareholders. The Committee reviews information provided by the compensation consultant to determine the appropriate level and mix of incentive compensation. Actual income in the form of incentive compensation is realized by the executive as a result of achieving Company goals and overall stock performance. The Committee believes that a significant portion of total target compensation should be comprised of incentive compensation. In order to reward long-term growth as well as short-term results, the Committee establishes incentive targets that emphasize long-term compensation at a higher level than short-term compensation.
The Committee annually reviews tally sheets on all components of each executive officer's compensation, including salary, bonus, equity and other long-term incentive compensation values granted, the actual value realized from stock option exercises and restricted stock and restricted stock
13
units vested, the value of all perquisites and other personal benefits, and the projected annual benefit under our Pension and Pension Equalization Plans. The Committee uses the tally sheets as a resource that concisely summarizes all elements of actual and potential future compensation of our officers facilitating the Committee's analysis of both the individual elements of compensation as well as the total aggregate amount of actual and projected compensation and internal pay relationships between the officer positions. In the review of tally sheets, the Committee concluded that both the annual compensation and the compensation mix were consistent with the Committee's expectations.
The components of total target compensation in 2008 were as follows:
|
Base Salary | Annual Incentive | Long-Term Incentive | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
David R. Emery |
36 | % | 25 | % | 39 | % | ||||
Anthony S. Cleberg |
46 | % | 21 | % | 33 | % | ||||
Thomas M. Ohlmacher |
39 | % | 19 | % | 42 | % | ||||
Linden R. Evans |
42 | % | 21 | % | 37 | % | ||||
Steven J. Helmers |
51 | % | 18 | % | 31 | % |
Base Salary. Base salaries for all officers are reviewed annually. The base salary component is targeted at the median of the market data provided by the compensation consultant. The actual base salary of each officer is determined by the executive's performance, the experience level of the officer, the executive's current position in a market-based salary range, and internal pay relationships. Evaluation and approval of base salary adjustments for 2008 occurred in December 2007, with the adjustments effective in January 2008. The Committee approved base salary increases for the Named Executive Officers averaging 4.2 percent. We also adjust the base salary of our executives at the time of a promotion or change in job responsibility, as appropriate.
Annual Incentive. Our Short-Term Annual Incentive Compensation Program is designed to recognize and reward the contributions of individual executives as well as the contributions that group performance makes to overall corporate success. The program's goal for our corporate officers is based on earnings per share targets in order to closely align interests with shareholders and to foster teamwork and cooperation within the officer team. The annual incentive, after applicable tax withholding, is distributed to the officer in the form of 50 percent stock and 50 percent cash, unless the officer has met his or her stock ownership guideline, in which event he or she may elect to receive the total award in cash, after applicable tax withholding. Target award levels are established as a percentage of each participant's base salary. A target award is comparable to the average annual incentive payout award of the comparator group at the 50th percentile level.
The Committee approves the target level for each officer in December, which is applicable to performance in the following plan year. Target levels are derived in part from competitive data provided by the compensation consultant and in part by the Committee's judgment on internal equity of the positions and their value to the Company. The target levels for the positions held by our Named Executive Officers in 2008 are shown below. The actual amount awarded to corporate officers ranges from zero to two times the target percentage depending on the performance level.
CEO |
70 | % | ||
COO-Non-regulated Energy |
50 | % | ||
COO-Utilities |
50 | % | ||
CFO |
45 | % | ||
Sr. Vice President and General Counsel |
35 | % |
The threshold, target and maximum payout levels for our Named Executive Officers under the 2008 Short-Term Annual Incentive Plan are shown in the Grants of Plan Based Awards in 2008 table under the heading "Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards."
14
Early in the first quarter, the Committee meets to establish the goals for the current plan year, to evaluate actual performance in relation to the prior year's targets and to approve the actual payment of awards related to the prior plan year. The Committee reserves the discretion to adjust any award, and will review and take into account individual performance, level of contribution, and the accomplishment of specific project goals that were initiated throughout the plan year.
In February 2008, the Committee reviewed the design of the Short-Term Annual Incentive Plan, addressing the volatility of our energy marketing segment's earnings and the potential that these earnings may disproportionately influence bonus outcomes for participants in the Short-Term Annual Incentive Plan. The Committee selected a modified earnings per share goal for the 2008 corporate goal that is weighted 80 percent on non-energy marketing earnings per share and 20 percent on energy marketing earnings per share. The Committee chose this weighted methodology because it aligns the plan more clearly with the ability of the majority of the employees to directly impact the results, and it prevents the variability of earnings from our energy marketing segment from disproportionately influencing payouts of the plan, both positively and negatively. It also continues to meet the objectives of the plan including:
The Committee approved the goals for the 2008 plan year for the corporate officers as follows:
Threshold
|
Consolidated Non-energy Marketing Earnings Per Share Goal |
Energy Marketing Earnings Per Share Goal |
Payout % of Target | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minimum |
$ | 1.87 | $ | 0.41 | 30 | % | ||||
Target |
$ | 1.99 | $ | 0.51 | 100 | % | ||||
Maximum |
$ | 2.23 | $ | 0.81 | 200 | % |
The target earnings per share goal for 2008 was equal to budgeted earnings per share, which did not include any earnings related to the Aquila acquisition since the timing of transaction closing was unknown at the time the budget was established. Target earnings per share also excluded the earnings impact of the sale of seven independent power plants, which was also not known at the time the budget was established. On January 29, 2009, the Committee approved a payout of 52 percent of target under the 2008 Short-Term Annual Incentive Plan comprised of a 32 percent payout from consolidated non-energy marketing earnings and 20 percent from energy marketing earnings. The actual consolidated non-energy marketing earnings for 2008 were $2.22 per share. After adjusting the earnings for the sale of seven independent power plants, the earnings and acquisition costs from the Aquila transaction, the non-cash mark-to-market loss on the forward interest swaps, and the non-cash ceiling test write-down of oil and gas assets, adjusted non-energy marketing earnings were $1.89 per share. This resulted in a payout of 40 percent of target for the non-energy marketing earnings goal. The actual energy marketing earnings for 2008 were $0.51 per share, resulting in a payout of 100 percent of target for the energy marketing earnings goal. The 2008 award, after applicable tax withholding, was distributed in the form of 50 percent stock and 50 percent cash for Messrs. Emery, Cleberg and Evans. Messrs. Ohlmacher and Helmers had met their stock ownership guidelines and elected to receive their
15
2008 award in the form of 100 percent cash. Awards for corporate officers under the Short-Term Annual Incentive Plan have varied significantly over the last five years as shown below.
Plan Year
|
Payout % of Target | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
2008 |
52 | % | ||
2007 |
200 | % | ||
2006 |
150 | % | ||
2005 |
100 | % | ||
2004 |
0 | % |
Actual awards made to each of our Named Executive Officers under the Short-Term Annual Incentive Plans for 2008 are included in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table.
Long-Term Incentive. Long-term incentive compensation is comprised of grants made by the Committee under our 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan ("Omnibus Incentive Plan") which was previously approved by our shareholders. Long-term incentive compensation is intended to:
The Committee oversees the administration of the Omnibus Incentive Plan with full power and authority to determine when and to whom awards will be granted, along with the type, amount and other terms and conditions of each award. The long-term incentive compensation component is currently composed of restricted stock (or restricted stock units) and performance shares. The Committee chose these components because they believe that executive compensation tied to stock price appreciation and total shareholder return is an effective way to align the interests of management with those of our shareholders. The Committee selected total shareholder return as the performance goal for the performance shares because it believes executive pay under a long-term, capital accumulation program such as this should mirror our performance in shareholder return as compared to our peer group of companies. None of our Named Executive Officers have received stock option grants since 2003. When stock options were granted, they were granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. No stock option back-dating occurred.
The value of long-term incentives awarded is based primarily on competitive market-based data presented by the compensation consultant to the Committee, the impact each position has on our shareholder return and internal pay relationships. The Committee approved the target long-term incentive compensation level for each officer in December 2007, which was awarded in January 2008.
The year 2008 was a transformational year for us with the acquisition of five utilities from Aquila and the divestiture of seven of our independent power plants. As a special recognition of the key contributions each officer made over a year-and-a-half period of time to successfully prepare for and close these transactions, the Committee awarded transaction completion bonuses to the officers in August 2008, taking into account each individual officer's involvement with and contribution to the transactions. The transaction completion bonuses were awarded in the form of restricted stock.
16
Long-term incentive compensation approved for the 2008 plan year and the transaction completion bonuses for our Named Executive Officers are shown in the table below.
|
Long-Term Incentive Value |
Percentage of Base Salary |
Transaction Completion Bonus |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
David R. Emery |
$ | 600,000 | 106 | % | $ | 250,000 | ||||
Anthony S. Cleberg |
$ | 225,000 | 71 | % | * | |||||
Thomas M. Ohlmacher |
$ | 380,000 | 108 | % | $ | 75,000 | ||||
Linden R. Evans |
$ | 239,000 | 87 | % | $ | 150,000 | ||||
Steven J. Helmers |
$ | 160,900 | 59 | % | $ | 100,000 |
The variance in percentage of base salary for the long-term incentive value of the Named Executive Officers reflects our philosophy that the CEO, CFO and COOs should have more of their total compensation at risk because they hold positions that have a greater impact on our long-term results.
Restricted stock (or restricted stock units) are targeted to deliver 50 percent of the long-term incentive opportunity, with the remaining 50 percent delivered in the form of performance shares. Mr. Cleberg's long-term incentive value was all awarded in the form of restricted stock since he began employment with us mid-year.
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units. Restricted stock and restricted stock units vest one-third each year over a three-year period, and automatically vest in their entirety upon death, disability or a change in control. Dividends are paid on the restricted shares and dividend equivalents accrue on restricted stock units. Unvested restricted stock or units are forfeited if an officer's employment is terminated for any reason other than death, disability or in the event of a change in control. Restricted stock and restricted stock units granted prior to December 10, 2007 also automatically vest in their entirety upon retirement. Corporate officers may elect to receive the award in the form of restricted stock, or to defer the payment under the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan, in the form of restricted stock units. Restricted stock award values are normally approved in December with a grant date effective in the first week in January of the following year. The number of shares awarded in 2008 for each of our Named Executive Officers are shown below and are included in the Grants of Plan Based Awards in 2008 table under the heading "All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units" and "Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards."
|
2008 Restricted Shares Granted |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Long-term Incentive Value |
Transaction Completion Bonus |
|||||
David R. Emery |
7,170 | 7,613 | |||||
Anthony S. Cleberg |
6,851 | | |||||
Thomas M. Ohlmacher |
4,541 | 2,284 | |||||
Linden R. Evans |
2,856 | 4,568 | |||||
Steven J. Helmers |
1,923 | 3,045 |
Performance Shares. Participants are awarded a target number of performance shares based upon the value of the individual performance share component approved by the Committee, divided by the Beginning Stock Price. The Beginning Stock Price, as defined under the Performance Plan, is the average of the closing price of our common stock for the 20 trading days immediately preceding the
17
beginning of the plan period. Entitlement to performance shares is based on our total shareholder return over designated performance periods, as measured against our peer group. In addition, in order for any performance shares to be awarded, our stock price must also increase during the performance period from the Beginning Stock Price. The final value of the performance shares is based upon the number of shares of common stock that are ultimately granted, based upon our performance in relation to the performance criteria. At the end of each respective performance period, actual awards may range from 0 percent to 175 percent of the target share amounts plus accrued dividends. A 100 percent payout of the target shares occurs if our total shareholder return exceeds the 50th percentile of the peer group. A zero percent payout occurs if we are below the 40th percentile and a maximum payout of 175 percent occurs if we perform at the 80th percentile or above. The performance awards and dividend equivalents, if earned, are paid in 50 percent cash and 50 percent common stock. All payroll deductions and applicable tax withholding related to the award are withheld from the cash portion. Performance share target grant values are normally approved in December for a three-year performance period beginning January 1 of the following year.
Our peer group is comprised of the following companies for the performance period that ended in 2008 and the performance period that ends in 2009:
Alliant Energy Corporation | NStar | |||||
DPL Inc. | OGE Energy Corporation | |||||
Great Plains Energy Incorporated | Pepco Holdings Inc. | |||||
Hawaiian Electrics Inds. | PNM Resources Inc. | |||||
IDACORP, Inc. | Puget Energy Inc. | |||||
Integrys Energy Group, Inc. | Wisconsin Energy Corp. | |||||
Northeast Utilities |
This peer group was originally identified as the companies in the S&P MidCap Electric Utilities Index; however because of re-categorizing of companies in the index by S&P from time to time, the companies in the peer group must be tracked individually.
The Committee changed our peer group for the January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2010 Performance Period, recognizing a peer group that is more reflective of Black Hills Corporation upon the closing of the acquisition of Aquila's electric utility in Colorado and its gas utilities in Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska and Iowa. The new peer group is comprised of the following companies:
AGL Resources Inc. | Otter Tail Corporation | |||||
ALLETE Inc. | PNM Resources, Inc. | |||||
Avista Corp | Portland General Electric Company | |||||
CH Energy Group Inc. | Puget Energy, Inc. | |||||
Cleco Corporation | NV Energy, Inc. | |||||
DPL Inc. | UIL Holdings Corporation | |||||
Great Plains Energy Incorporated | UniSource Energy Corporation | |||||
IDACORP, Inc. | Vectren Corporation | |||||
MDU Resources Group, Inc. | Westar Energy, Inc. | |||||
NorthWestern Corporation | WGL Holdings, Inc. |
Each performance share period extends for three-years. For the recently completed performance period, January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2008, our total shareholder return was17 percent, which ranked at the 9th percentile of our peer group, resulting in no payout. The collapse of oil prices over the second half of the year combined with the effects of the global credit crisis created significant negative impacts on our overall financial performance in 2008.
18
Actual awards for the corporate officers under the Performance Share Plan have varied significantly since the plan began as shown below.
Performance Period
|
Payout % of Target | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2008 |
0 | |||
January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2007 |
175 | |||
March 1, 2004 to December 31, 2006 |
37 | |||
March 1, 2004 to December 31, 2005 |
175 |
Target shares for each of our Named Executive Officers for the outstanding performance periods are as follows:
|
January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2009 Performance Period |
January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2010 Performance Period |
January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2011 Performance Period |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
David R. Emery |
8,163 | 6,900 | 12,319 | |||||||
Anthony S. Cleberg |
NA | NA | 5,866 | |||||||
Thomas M. Ohlmacher |
5,170 | 4,370 | 7,431 | |||||||
Linden R. Evans |
3,252 | 2,748 | 7,431 | |||||||
Steven J. Helmers |
2,189 | 1,850 | 5,084 |
Actual payouts, if any, will be determined based upon the total shareholder return for the plan period in comparison to the peer group.
Performance Evaluation
Role of Executive Officers in Compensation Decisions. The CEO annually reviews the performance of each of our senior officers. He presents a summary of his evaluation of all of our senior officers to the Committee and thoroughly reviews the COO-Utilities, COO-Non-regulated Energy and CFO evaluations with the Committee. Based upon these performance reviews, market analysis conducted by compensation consultants and discussions with our Chief Human Resources Officer and Human Resources department staff, the CEO recommends the compensation for this group of officers to the Committee. The Committee may exercise its discretion in modifying any of the recommended compensation and award levels in its review and approval process.
Role of the Committee and Board in Setting Executive Compensation. At the beginning of each year, the Committee reviews and establishes the corporation's financial targets and the CEO's goals and objectives for the year. At the end of each year the Committee evaluates the CEO's performance in light of established goals and objectives, with input from the other independent directors. Based upon the Committee's evaluation and recommendation, the independent directors of the Board set the CEO's annual compensation, including salary, bonus, incentive and equity compensation and perquisites.
The Committee reviews the CEO's evaluation of the performance of the COO-Utilities, COO-Non-regulated Energy and the CFO in light of established goals and objectives. Based upon the Committee's review and recommendation, the Board of Directors sets the annual compensation of the COO-Utilities, COO-Non-regulated Energy and CFO, including salary, bonus, incentive and equity compensation and perquisites. The Committee also reviews and approves the CEO's recommendations for compensation of our other corporate officers. The Committee is required to approve all decisions regarding equity awards to our officers.
19
Stock Ownership Guidelines
The Committee has implemented stock ownership guidelines that apply to all officers based upon their level of responsibility. We believe it is important for our officers to hold a significant amount of our common stock to further align their performance with the interest of our shareholders. A "retention ratio" approach to stock ownership is incorporated into the guidelines. This approach requires officers to retain 100 percent of all shares owned, including shares awarded through our incentive plans (net of share withholding for taxes and in the case of cashless stock option exercises, net of the exercise price and withholding for taxes) until specific ownership goals are achieved. Ownership guidelines are denominated in share amounts which approximate a multiple of base pay.
The ownership guidelines by officer level are as follows:
Officer Level
|
Ownership Guideline (# of Shares) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
CEO |
90,000 | |||
COOs and CFO |
40,000 | |||
Other Senior Executive Officers |
25,000 | |||
Other Corporate Officers and Business Unit Leaders |
10,000 | |||
Other Subsidiary Officers |
5,000 |
The ownership guidelines and current stock ownership of our Named Executive Officers are shown below.
Officer Level
|
Ownership Guideline (# of Shares) |
Actual Ownership (# of Shares) |
Years in Position |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
David R. Emery, CEO |
90,000 | 93,253 | 5 | |||||
Anthony S. Cleberg, CFO |
40,000 | 13,414 | 0.5 | |||||
Thomas M. Ohlmacher, COO-Non-regulated Energy |
40,000 | 49,697 | 7 | |||||
Linden R. Evans, COO-Utilities |
40,000 | 36,040 | 4 | |||||
Steven J. Helmers, Senior Vice President & General Counsel |
25,000 | 34,213 | 8 |
Benefits
Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits. We provide a limited number of market-based perquisites to our executive officers, including financial planning services and personal use of a Company vehicle. The total value of these perquisites in 2008 did not exceed $9,000 for any one of our Named Executive Officers. In addition, Mr. Cleberg also received temporary living and travel expenses associated with his relocation. The specific amounts attributable to perquisites for 2008 are disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table. The Committee periodically reviews the perquisites and other personal benefits provided to our executive officers and believes the current perquisites are reasonable and consistent with our overall compensation program.
Retirement and Other Benefits. We currently maintain a variety of employee benefit plans and programs in which our executive officers may participate, including a 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan, a Qualified Defined Benefit Pension Plan (the "Pension Plan"), Nonqualified Pension Plans and the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan. The Nonqualified Pension Plans include our Grandfathered Pension Equalization Plan, 2005 Pension Equalization Plan, 2007 Pension Equalization Plan and Pension Restoration Plan. We believe it is important to provide post-employment benefits to our executive officers and the benefits we provide approximate retirement benefits paid by other employers to executives in similar executive positions. The Committee periodically reviews the benefits provided with assistance from its compensation consultant to maintain a market-based benefits package.
20
The Black Hills Corporation 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan is offered to all eligible employees of the Company and its subsidiaries except for Cheyenne Light, Fuel and Power and Black Hills Energy which have their own 401(k) Plans. All of our Named Executive Officers are participants in the Black Hills Corporation 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan. Participants may elect to invest up to 100 percent of their eligible compensation on a pre-tax basis up to maximum amounts established by the Internal Revenue Service. The Black Hills Corporation 401(k) Plan provides a matching contribution of 100 percent of the employee's annual tax-deferred contribution up to a maximum of 3 percent of eligible compensation. Matching contributions vest at 20 percent per year and are fully vested when the participant has five years of service with the Company. Each of our Named Executive Officers that was employed by the Company for the entire year received the maximum annual contribution of $6,900 in 2008. The matching contribution is included as "All Other Compensation" in the Summary Compensation Table.
The Pension Plan covers the employees of Black Hills Corporation and a number of its subsidiary companies. Cheyenne Light, Fuel and Power and Black Hills Energy have their own plans. The Pension Plan is a qualified defined benefit pension plan that provides benefits at retirement based on length of employment service and certain average compensation levels during the highest five consecutive years of the last ten years of service. Our employees do not contribute to the plans. Each of our Named Executive Officers are participants in the Pension Plan and none of our Named Executive Officers have been granted additional years of credited service.
The Pension Plan is limited by the Internal Revenue Code in the amount of annual payments received under the plan ($185,000 in 2008) and in the amount of compensation that can be taken into account in determining contributions and benefits ($230,000 in 2008). Because of these limitations we also have the Nonqualified Pension Plans. Messrs. Emery, Ohlmacher and Helmers are participants in the Grandfathered Pension Equalization Plan and the 2005 Pension Equalization Plan. These plans were frozen to new participants in 2002. In 2007, the Committee, in consultation with Mercer Human Resource Consulting, an independent consultant engaged by the Committee, thoroughly reviewed the need to offer some form of supplemental retirement plan to officers. The Committee concluded that a supplemental retirement plan was needed for corporate officers in order to provide a benefits package consistent with market practices. In 2007, the Committee recommended and the Board of Directors approved the 2007 Pension Equalization Plan. Corporate officers that were not participants in the 2005 Pension Equalization Plan were named participants in the 2007 Pension Equalization Plan. Messrs. Cleberg and Evans are participants in the 2007 Pension Equalization Plan. All of the Named Executive Officers are participants in the Pension Restoration Plan. The level of retirement benefits provided by the Nonqualified Plans for each of our Named Executive Officers is reflected in the Pension Benefits for 2008 table and explained in more detail in the accompanying narrative.
Change in Control Payments. Our Named Executive Officers may also receive severance benefits in the event of a change in control. Change in control agreements are common among our peer group and the Committee and our Board of Directors believe providing these agreements to our corporate officers protect our shareholder interests in the event of a change in control by helping assure management focus and continuity. Our change in control agreements have expiration dates and our Board of Directors conducts a thorough review of the change in control agreements before renewing them.
In preparation for the June 1, 2008 expiration date of the existing change in control agreements, the Committee conducted a thorough review of the agreements in the first quarter of 2008. The Committee engaged Towers Perrin to review the terms of our change in control agreements, as compared with current market practice and trends, to provide program design recommendations and to model the costs of the agreements. Overall, Towers Perrin found the agreements were generally competitive with the external market comparisons. Towers Perrin did recommend modifying the definition of pay from a 5-year average to using the current base pay and current target bonus amount,
21
and removing any discretionary bonus payments from the definition of pay in a change in control severance calculation. Following the review, the Committee recommended the proposed changes to the Board of Directors, which the Board approved. New change in control agreements with a June 1, 2011 expiration date were entered into with each of our corporate officers, replacing the change in control agreements that expired on June 1, 2008. In addition, the CEO voluntarily forfeited the "window period" that was in his prior agreement which provided the opportunity for him to elect to terminate his employment for any reason during the 30-day period immediately following the first anniversary of the change in control. In general, our change in control agreements provide a severance payment of up to 2.99 times average compensation for our CEO, and up to two times average compensation for our other corporate officers. The change in control agreements contain a "double trigger," providing benefits in association with a change in control only upon:
See the Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control table and the accompanying narrative for more information regarding our change in control agreements and estimated payments associated with a change in control.
Tax and Accounting Implications
Section 162(m) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, limits the tax deductibility by a corporation of compensation in excess of $1 million paid to its CEO and any of its four most highly compensated executive officers. Compensation which qualifies as "performance-based" is excluded from the $1 million limit, if, among other requirements, the compensation is payable only upon attainment of pre-established, objective performance goals under a plan approved by the corporation's shareholders. As a result, the Compensation Committee has designed a large share of our incentive compensation for our Named Executive Officers to qualify for the exemption of "performance-based" compensation from the deductibility limit. However, the Compensation Committee does have the discretion to design and use compensation elements that may not be deductible under Section 162(m) if it determines those elements are in line with competitive practice, our compensation philosophy, and our best interests. We believe the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers in 2008 is fully deductible.
Clawback Policy
We have a policy that if an accounting restatement occurs after incentive payments have been made, due to the results of misconduct associated with financial reporting, the Committee will seek repayment of the incentive compensation from our CEO and CFO and has the discretion to request repayment of incentive compensation from our other officers, taking into consideration the individual roles and responsibilities prompting the restatement.
2009 Compensation Actions
As a result of the current economic downturn, the Committee and the Board of Directors did not increase the base salaries of our officers for 2009. This may be reevaluated later in the year if market conditions improve. They did establish short-term and long-term incentive levels for our officers based on a structure similar to that used for the 2008 awards. Establishing the opportunity for our executives to earn incentive compensation if performance objectives are achieved, while freezing base pay, links the personal interests of our officers with those of our shareholders during these difficult economic times.
22
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Company's Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.
THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Jack
W. Eugster, Chairperson
David C. Ebertz
Kay S. Jorgensen
Stephen D. Newlin
Gary L. Pechota
23
The following table sets forth the total compensation paid or earned by each of our Named Executive Officers for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006. We have no employment agreements with our Named Executive Officers. Amounts listed under the heading "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" represent amounts earned under the Short-Term Annual Incentive Plan for each year. The Compensation Committee approved the payout of the 2008 awards at its January 29, 2009, meeting and the awards were paid on March 6, 2009.
Based on the fair value of equity awards granted to our Named Executive Officers in 2008 and the base salary of our Named Executive Officers, base salary accounted for 36 percent to 51 percent of total compensation, short-term annual incentive accounted for 18 percent to 25 percent of total compensation and long-term incentive accounted for 31 percent to 42 percent of total compensation. Because the table below reflects the value of certain equity awards based on the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 123(R), "Share-Based Payment," ("FAS 123(R)") value rather than the fair value, these percentages cannot be derived using the amounts reflected in the table below.
Name and Principal Position |
Year | Salary | Bonus(1) | Stock Awards(2) |
Option Awards(3) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(4) |
Change in Pension Value and Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings(5) |
All Other Compensation(6) |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
David R. Emery |
2008 | $ | 563,269 | | $ | 348,766 | | $ | 205,296 | $ | 549,730 | $ | 42,293 | $ | 1,709,354 | ||||||||||||||
Chairman, |
2007 | $ | 544,231 | | $ | 921,030 | | $ | 763,000 | $ | 312,524 | $ | 36,583 | $ | 2,577,368 | ||||||||||||||
President and Chief Executive Officer |
2006 | $ | 524,039 | | $ | 327,766 | $ | 14,551 | $ | 551,250 | $ | 249,828 | $ | 40,276 | $ | 1,707,710 | |||||||||||||
Anthony S. Cleberg |
2008 |
$ |
130,846 |
|
$ |
31,248 |
|
$ |
34,020 |
$ |
3,645 |
$ |
25,911 |
$ |
225,670 |
||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mark T. Thies |
2008 |
$ |
36,365 |
|
$ |
(125,043 |
) |
|
|
$ |
140,511 |
$ |
372,198 |
$ |
424,031 |
||||||||||||||
Former Executive |
2007 | $ | 288,377 | | $ | 390,408 | | $ | 230,960 | $ | 19,058 | $ | 19,776 | $ | 948,579 | ||||||||||||||
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(7) |
2006 | $ | 279,885 | | $ | 153,680 | $ | 14,239 | $ | 168,180 | $ | 55,459 | $ | 31,969 | $ | 703,412 | |||||||||||||
Thomas M. Ohlmacher |
2008 |
$ |
350,600 |
|
$ |
82,441 |
|
$ |
91,260 |
$ |
292,809 |
$ |
28,915 |
$ |
846,025 |
||||||||||||||
President and |
2007 | $ | 340,600 | | $ | 766,103 | | $ | 340,600 | $ | 13,645 | $ | 26,103 | $ | 1,487,051 | ||||||||||||||
Chief Operating OfficerNon-regulated Energy |
2006 | $ | 340,219 | $ | 32,000 | $ | 405,299 | $ | 34,085 | $ | 255,450 | $ | 223,970 | $ | 35,574 | $ | 1,326,597 | ||||||||||||
Linden R. Evans |
2008 |
$ |
273,212 |
|
$ |
145,811 |
|
$ |
71,240 |
$ |
125,292 |
$ |
24,421 |
$ |
639,976 |
||||||||||||||
President and |
2007 | $ | 253,035 | | $ | 432,649 | | $ | 253,500 | $ | 53,952 | $ | 20,166 | $ | 1,013,302 | ||||||||||||||
Chief Operating OfficerUtilities |
2006 | $ | 240,712 | | $ | 151,114 | $ | 12,748 | $ | 181,050 | $ | 10,802 | $ | 20,088 | $ | 616,514 | |||||||||||||
Steven J. Helmers |
2008 |
$ |
269,604 |
|
$ |
99,757 |
|
$ |
49,140 |
$ |
121,460 |
$ |
21,648 |
$ |
561,609 |
||||||||||||||
Senior Vice |
2007 | $ | 259,408 | | $ | 296,868 | | $ | 181,790 | $ | 54,414 | $ | 15,231 | $ | 807,711 | ||||||||||||||
President and General Counsel |
2006 | $ | 251,819 | | $ | 115,168 | $ | 9,612 | $ | 132,353 | $ | 109,035 | $ | 17,322 | $ | 635,309 |
24
FAS 123(R),
and therefore includes amounts for awards granted in prior years. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 10 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Mr. Thies
terminated employment in January 2008 and forfeited 2,970 shares of restricted stock and 5,796 target performance shares. Previously recorded compensation expense associated with
these awards in the amount of $125,043 was reversed in accordance with FAS 123(R).
Mr. Ohlmacher turned age 55 in September 2006 which made him eligible for early retirement. Because our restricted stock and restricted stock units granted prior to December 10, 2007 fully vest at retirement, the fair value of $190,000 associated with Mr. Ohlmacher's awards granted in each of 2007 and 2006 was all recognized in the year of grant in accordance with FAS 123(R), rather than expensing the award over the normal three year vesting period.
The PEP is offered through the Grandfathered Pension Equalization Plan ("Grandfathered PEP"), 2005 Pension Equalization Plan ("2005 PEP") and 2007 Pension Equalization Plan ("2007 PEP"). No Named Executive Officer received preferential or above-market earnings on nonqualified deferred compensation. The value attributed from each plan to each Named Executive Officer is shown in the table below. Mr. Evans was not a participant in the PRB in 2007 and 2006. Messrs. Emery, Thies, Ohlmacher and Helmers are participants in the Grandfathered PEP and 2005 PEP. Messrs. Cleberg and Evans are the only Named Executive Officers participating in the 2007 PEP.
|
Year | Defined Benefit Plan |
PRB | PEP | Total Change in Pension Value |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
David R. Emery |
2008 | $ | 33,858 | $ | 264,299 | $ | 251,573 | $ | 549,730 | |||||||
|
2007 | $ | 6,366 | $ | 159,889 | $ | 146,269 | $ | 312,524 | |||||||
|
2006 | $ | 13,444 | $ | 116,786 | $ | 119,598 | $ | 249,828 | |||||||
Anthony S. Cleberg |
2008 |
|
$ |
3,645 |
|
$ |
3,645 |
|||||||||
Mark T. Thies |
2008 |
$ |
17,844 |
$ |
34,908 |
$ |
87,759 |
$ |
140,511 |
|||||||
|
2007 | $ | 6,897 | $ | 9,195 | $ | 2,966 | $ | 19,058 | |||||||
|
2006 | $ | 11,200 | $ | 16,192 | $ | 28,067 | $ | 55,459 | |||||||
Thomas M. Ohlmacher |
2008 |
$ |
101,389 |
$ |
109,258 |
$ |
82,162 |
$ |
292,809 |
|||||||
|
2007 | $ | 36,675 | $ | (18,858 | ) | $ | (4,172 | ) | $ | 13,645 | |||||
|
2006 | $ | 49,308 | $ | 109,399 | $ | 65,263 | $ | 223,970 | |||||||
Linden R. Evans |
2008 |
$ |
19,368 |
$ |
48,132 |
$ |
57,792 |
$ |
125,292 |
|||||||
|
2007 | $ | 14,958 | | $ | 38,994 | $ | 53,952 | ||||||||
|
2006 | $ | 10,802 | | | $ | 10,802 | |||||||||
Steven J. Helmers |
2008 |
$ |
26,157 |
$ |
22,526 |
$ |
72,777 |
$ |
121,460 |
|||||||
|
2007 | $ | 13,460 | $ | 13,020 | $ | 27,934 | $ | 54,414 | |||||||
|
2006 | $ | 20,172 | $ | 16,389 | $ | 72,474 | $ | 109,035 |
25
|
Year | Severance | 401(k) Match |
Dividends on Restricted Stock/Units |
Total Perquisites |
Total Other Compensation |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
David R. Emery |
2008 | | $ | 6,900 | $ | 26,496 | $ | 8,897 | $ | 42,293 | |||||||||
Anthony S. Cleberg |
2008 | | $ | 3,925 | $ | 4,796 | $ | 17,190 | $ | 25,911 | |||||||||
Mark T. Thies |
2008 | $ | 364,067 | $ | 6,900 | | $ | 1,231 | $ | 372,198 | |||||||||
Thomas M. Ohlmacher |
2008 | | $ | 6,900 | $ | 15,235 | $ | 6,780 | $ | 28,915 | |||||||||
Linden R. Evans |
2008 | | $ | 6,900 | $ | 11,780 | $ | 5,741 | $ | 24,421 | |||||||||
Steven J. Helmers |
2008 | | $ | 6,900 | $ | 8,037 | $ | 6,711 | $ | 21,648 |
GRANTS OF PLAN BASED AWARDS IN 2008(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units(4) (#) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) |
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(3) |
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards(5) ($) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Date of Compensation Committee Action |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name
|
Grant Date |
Threshold ($) |
Target ($) |
Maximum ($) |
Threshold (#) |
Target (#) |
Maximum (#) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
David R. Emery |
$ | 118,440 | $ | 394,800 | $ | 789,600 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1/01/08 | 12/10/07 | 3,450 | 6,900 | 12,075 | $ | 317,400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1/04/08 | 12/10/07 | 7,170 | $ | 299,993 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
8/13/08 | 7/28/08 | 7,613 | $ | 250,010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anthony S. Cleberg(6) |
$ |
19,561 |
$ |
65,205 |
$ |
130,410 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
8/13/08 | 7/07/08 | 6,851 | $ | 224,986 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas M. Ohlmacher |
$ |
52,650 |
$ |
175,500 |
$ |
351,000 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1/01/08 | 12/10/07 | 2,185 | 4,370 | 7,648 | $ | 201,020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1/04/08 | 12/10/07 | 4,541 | $ | 189,995 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
8/13/08 | 7/28/08 | 2,284 | $ | 75,006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Linden R. Evans |
$ |
41,100 |
$ |
137,000 |
$ |
274,000 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1/01/08 | 12/10/07 | 1,374 | 2,748 | 4,809 | $ | 126,408 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1/04/08 | 12/10/07 | 2,856 | $ | 119,495 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
8/13/08 | 7/28/08 | 4,568 | $ | 150,013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Steven J. Helmers |
$ |
28,350 |
$ |
94,500 |
$ |
189,000 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1/01/08 | 12/10/07 | 925 | 1,850 | 3,237 | $ | 85,100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1/04/08 | 12/10/07 | 1,923 | $ | 80,458 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
8/13/08 | 7/28/08 | 3,045 | $ | 99,997 |
26
during the performance period, the participant or the participant's estate is entitled to that portion of the number of performance shares as such participant would have been entitled to had he or she remained employed, prorated for the number of months served. Performance shares are forfeited if employment is terminated for any other reason. During the performance period, dividends and other distributions paid with respect to the shares of common stock shall accrue for the benefit of the participant and are paid out at the end of the performance period.
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END 2008(1)
|
Option Awards | Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#) |
Option Exercise Price ($) |
Option Expiration Date |
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(2) (#) |
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested(2) (#) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) |
|||||||||||||||
David R. Emery |
8,000 | $ | 24.0625 | 7/20/09 | 22,732 | $ | 612,855 | 7,532 | $ | 203,049 | ||||||||||||
|
30,000 | $ | 21.8750 | 4/25/10 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
5,000 | $ | 55.3600 | 5/30/11 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
4,595 | $ | 35.1000 | 4/23/12 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
7,500 | $ | 27.4900 | 3/31/13 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
13,787 | $ | 28.0900 | 5/15/13 | ||||||||||||||||||
Anthony S. Cleberg |
|
|
|
6,851 |
$ |
184,703 |
|
|
||||||||||||||
Thomas M. Ohlmacher |
2,500 |
$ |
55.3600 |
5/30/11 |
12,024 |
$ |
324,167 |
4,770 |
$ |
128,599 |
||||||||||||
Linden R. Evans |
2,000 |
$ |
32.3400 |
6/17/12 |
10,698 |
$ |
288,418 |
3,000 |
$ |
80,880 |
||||||||||||
|
3,000 | $ | 25.1600 | 12/10/12 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
5,000 | $ | 29.8300 | 12/31/13 | ||||||||||||||||||
Steven J. Helmers |
9,000 |
$ |
55.3600 |
5/30/11 |
7,263 |
$ |
195,810 |
2,020 |
$ |
54,446 |
||||||||||||
|
10,110 | $ | 35.1000 | 4/23/12 |
27
|
Unvested Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units |
Unvested and Unearned Performance Shares |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name
|
# of Shares | Vesting Date | # of Shares | Vesting Date | |||||||||
David R. Emery |
2,390 | 1/04/09 | | 12/31/08 | |||||||||
|
2,741 | 1/05/09 | 4,082 | 12/31/09 | |||||||||
|
2,466 | 1/06/09 | 3,450 | 12/31/10 | |||||||||
|
2,537 | 8/13/09 | |||||||||||
|
2,390 | 1/04/10 | |||||||||||
|
2,742 | 1/05/10 | |||||||||||
|
2,538 | 8/13/10 | |||||||||||
|
2,390 | 1/04/11 | |||||||||||
|
2,538 | 8/13/11 | |||||||||||
Anthony S. Cleberg |
2,283 |
8/13/09 |
|
|
|||||||||
|
2,284 | 8/13/10 | |||||||||||
|
2,284 | 8/13/11 | |||||||||||
Thomas M. Ohlmacher |
1,513 |
1/04/09 |
|
12/31/08 |
|||||||||
|
1,707 | 1/05/09 | 2,585 | 12/31/09 | |||||||||
|
1,785 | 1/06/09 | 2,185 | 12/31/10 | |||||||||
|
761 | 8/13/09 | |||||||||||
|
1,514 | 1/04/10 | |||||||||||
|
1,707 | 1/05/10 | |||||||||||
|
761 | 8/13/10 | |||||||||||
|
1,514 | 1/04/11 | |||||||||||
|
762 | 8/13/11 | |||||||||||
Linden R. Evans |
952 |
1/04/09 |
|
12/31/08 |
|||||||||
|
1,073 | 1/05/09 | 1,626 | 12/31/09 | |||||||||
|
1,127 | 1/06/09 | 1,374 | 12/31/10 | |||||||||
|
1,522 | 8/13/09 | |||||||||||
|
952 | 1/04/10 | |||||||||||
|
1,074 | 1/05/10 | |||||||||||
|
1,523 | 8/13/10 | |||||||||||
|
952 | 1/04/11 | |||||||||||
|
1,523 | 8/13/11 | |||||||||||
Steven J. Helmers |
641 |
1/04/09 |
|
12/31/08 |
|||||||||
|
769 | 1/05/09 | 1,095 | 12/31/09 | |||||||||
|
756 | 1/06/09 | 925 | 12/31/10 | |||||||||
|
1,015 | 8/13/09 | |||||||||||
|
641 | 1/04/10 | |||||||||||
|
770 | 1/05/10 | |||||||||||
|
1,015 | 8/13/10 | |||||||||||
|
641 | 1/04/11 | |||||||||||
|
1,015 | 8/13/11 |
28
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED DURING 2008
|
Option Awards | Stock Awards(1) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name
|
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) |
Value Realized on Exercise ($) |
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) |
Value Realized on Vesting ($) |
|||||||||
David R. Emery |
5,000 | $ | 70,250 | 22,047 | $ | 945,990 | |||||||
Anthony S. Cleberg |
| | | | |||||||||
Mark T. Thies |
58,047 | $ | 744,789 | 9,850 | $ | 333,133 | |||||||
Thomas M. Ohlmacher |
| | 17,713 | $ | 760,971 | ||||||||
Linden R. Evans |
| | 11,176 | $ | 480,179 | ||||||||
Steven J. Helmers |
| | 7,500 | $ | 322,172 |
Pension benefits for our Named Executive Officers can be comprised of a qualified defined benefit pension, a nonqualified pension restoration benefit and a supplemental pension benefit. None of our Named Executive Officers received any pension benefit payments during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
Name
|
Plan Name | Number of Years of Credited Service(1) (#) |
Present Value of Accumulated Benefit(2) ($) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
David R. Emery |
Defined Benefit Pension Plan | 19.42 | $ | 236,719 | |||||
|
Pension Restoration Benefit | 19.42 | $ | 753,281 | |||||
|
Grandfathered Pension Equalization Plan | 10.00 | $ | 353,279 | |||||
|
2005 Pension Equalization Plan | 14.00 | $ | 598,857 | |||||
Anthony S. Cleberg |
Defined Benefit Pension Plan |
|
|
||||||
|
Pension Restoration Benefit | 0.42 | $ | 3,645 | |||||
|
2007 Pension Equalization Plan | | | ||||||
Mark T. Thies |
Defined Benefit Pension Plan |
10.75 |
$ |
114,392 |
|||||
|
Pension Restoration Benefit | 10.75 | $ | 115,409 | |||||
|
Grandfathered Pension Equalization Plan | 7.00 | $ | 267,709 | |||||
|
2005 Pension Equalization Plan | 10.00 | $ | 172,807 | |||||
Thomas M. Ohlmacher |
Defined Benefit Pension Plan |
34.50 |
$ |
878,919 |
|||||
|
Pension Restoration Benefit | 34.50 | $ | 1,338,315 | |||||
|
Grandfathered Pension Equalization Plan | 13.00 | $ | 1,088,179 | |||||
|
2005 Pension Equalization Plan | 17.00 | $ | 73,064 | |||||
Linden R. Evans |
Defined Benefit Pension Plan |
7.58 |
$ |
82,409 |
|||||
|
Pension Restoration Benefit | 7.58 | $ | 60,165 | |||||
|
2007 Pension Equalization Plan | 4.00 | $ | 111,234 |
29
Name
|
Plan Name | Number of Years of Credited Service(1) (#) |
Present Value of Accumulated Benefit(2) ($) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Steven J. Helmers |
Defined Benefit Pension Plan |
7.92 | $ | 125,163 | |||||
|
Pension Restoration Benefit | 7.92 | $ | 79,215 | |||||
|
Grandfathered Pension Equalization Plan | 3.00 | $ | 102,005 | |||||
|
2005 Pension Equalization Plan | 7.00 | $ | 467,464 |
Defined Benefit Pension Plan
We have a Defined Benefit Retirement Plan, a qualified pension plan, in which our Named Executive Officers are included. Participants become eligible for the benefit when they have been employed by us for at least one year and are at least 21 years of age. The plan provides benefits at retirement based on length of employment service and average compensation levels during the highest five consecutive years of the last ten years of service. For purposes of the benefit calculation, earnings include wages and other cash compensation received from the Company, including any bonus, commission, unused paid time off or incentive compensation. It also includes any elective before-tax contributions made by the employee to a Company sponsored cafeteria plan or 401(k) plan. However, it does not include any expense reimbursements, taxable fringe benefits, moving expenses or moving/relocation allowances, nonqualified deferred compensation, non-cash incentives, stock options and any payments of long-term incentive compensation such as restricted stock or payments under performance share plans. The Internal Revenue Code places maximum limitations on the amount of compensation that may be recognized when determining benefits of qualified pension plans. In 2008, the maximum amount of compensation that could be recognized when determining compensation was $230,000 (called "covered compensation").
The benefit formula for the Named Executive Officers is the sum of (a) and (b) below.
0.9% of average earnings (up to covered compensation), multiplied by credited service after January 31, 2000, limited to a maximum of 35 years minus the number of years of credited service before January 31, 2000 | Plus |
1.3% of average earnings in excess of covered compensation, multiplied by credited service after January 31, 2000, limited to a maximum of 35 years minus the number of years of credited service before January 31, 2000 |
Plus
1.2% of average earnings (up to covered compensation), multiplied by credited service before January 31, 2000, limited to a maximum of 35 years | Plus |
1.6% of average earnings in excess of covered compensation, multiplied by credited service before January 31, 2000, limited to a maximum of 35 years |
30
Pension benefits are not reduced for social security benefits. The Internal Revenue Code places maximum limitations on annual benefit amounts that can be paid under qualified pension plans. In 2008, the maximum benefit payable under qualified pension plans was $185,000. Accrued benefits become 100 percent vested after an employee completes five years of service. None of our Named Executive Officers have been credited with extra years of credited service under the plan.
Normal retirement is defined as age 65 under the plan. Participants who have completed at least five years of credited service can retire and receive defined benefit pension benefits as early as age 55. However, the retirement benefit will be reduced by five percent for each year of retirement before age 62. For example, a participant with at least five years of credited service may retire at age 55 and receive a pension benefit equal to 65 percent of the normal retirement benefit. A participant with five years of service who retires from the Company may begin receiving retirement benefits on an unreduced basis at age 62. Mr. Ohlmacher is currently age 57 and is entitled to early retirement benefits under this provision.
If a participant is vested and leaves the Company before reaching his or her earliest retirement date, he or she may begin receiving the full value of his or her vested benefit at age 65 or can receive a reduced benefit as early as age 55 if he or she has at least five years of credited service when he or she leaves employment of the Company. The benefit will be reduced by five percent for each year he or she begins receiving benefits prior to age 65. For example, a participant who leaves the Company before reaching age 55 with at least five years of credited service may begin receiving benefits at age 55 equal to 50 percent of the normal retirement benefit and may begin receiving retirement benefits at age 65 on an unreduced basis.
If a participant is single, the benefit is paid as a life annuity. If a participant is married, the benefit is paid as a joint and 50 percent survivor annuity unless an optional form of payment is chosen.
Our employees do not contribute to the plan. The amount of the annual contribution by us to the plan is based on an actuarial determination.
Pension Equalization Plans and Pension Restoration Benefit
We also have a Grandfathered Pension Equalization Plan, a 2005 Pension Equalization Plan, a 2007 Pension Equalization Plan and a Pension Restoration Benefit, nonqualified supplemental plans, in which benefits are not tax deductible until paid. The plans are designed to provide the higher paid executive employee a retirement benefit which, when added to social security benefits and the pension to be received under the Defined Benefit Pension Plan, will approximate retirement benefits being paid by other employers to its employees in similar executive positions. The employee's pension from the qualified pension plan is limited by the Internal Revenue Code. The 2008 limit was set at $185,000 annually and the compensation taken into account in determining contributions and benefits could not exceed $230,000 and could not include nonqualified deferred compensation. The amount of deferred compensation paid under nonqualified plans is not subject to these limits.
Grandfathered Pension Equalization Plan and 2005 Pension Equalization Plan. The Grandfathered Pension Equalization Plan and the 2005 Pension Equalization Plan are bifurcated plans from the Original Pension Equalization Plan. The Grandfathered Pension Equalization Plan provides the pension equalization benefits to each participant who had earned and vested benefits under the Original Plan before January 1, 2005, and are not subject to the provisions of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. The 2005 Pension Equalization Plan provides the pension equalization benefits to each participant that were earned and vested on or after January 1, 2005, and are subject to the provisions of Section 409A.
A participant under the Grandfathered and 2005 Pension Equalization Plans does not qualify for benefits until the benefits become vested under the following vesting schedule. The vesting is based on
31
years of employment under the plan, not total years of service with the Company. No credit for past service is granted under the Grandfathered and 2005 Pension Equalization Plans.
Years of Plan Participation
|
% of Benefit Vested |
Years of Plan Participation
|
% of Benefit Vested |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Less than 3 years |
0 | % | 6 years but less than 7 |
65 | % | ||||
3 years but less than 4 |
20 | % | 7 years but less than 8 |
80 | % | ||||
4 years but less than 5 |
35 | % | 8 or more years |
100 | % | ||||
5 years but less than 6 |
50 | % |
The annual benefit is 25 percent of the employee's average earnings, if salary was less than two times the Social Security Wage Base, or 30 percent, if salary was more than two times the Social Security Wage Base, multiplied by the vesting percentage. Average earnings are normally an employee's average earnings for the five highest consecutive full years of employment during the ten full years of employment immediately preceding the year of calculation. The annual benefit is paid on a monthly basis for 15 years to each participating employee and, if deceased, to the employee's designated beneficiary or estate, commencing at the earliest of death or when the employee is both retired and 62 years of age or more. A participant with vested benefits who is 55 years of age or older and no longer an employee of the Company may elect to be paid benefits beginning at age 55 or older, subject to a discount of such benefits according to the following schedule.
Age at Start of Payments
|
% of Benefit Payable |
Age at Start of Payments
|
% of Benefit Payable |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
61 |
93.0 | % | 57 |
69.7 | % | ||||
60 |
86.5 | % | 56 |
64.8 | % | ||||
59 |
80.5 | % | 55 |
60.3 | % | ||||
58 |
74.9 | % |
Participants in the Grandfathered and 2005 Pension Equalization Plans were designated by our Board of Directors upon recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer. Messrs. Emery, Thies, Ohlmacher and Helmers are participants in the Grandfathered and 2005 Pension Equalization Plans. These plans have been frozen to new participants since 2002.
2007 Pension Equalization Plan. During 2006 and 2007, the Compensation Committee reviewed the need to offer some form of supplemental retirement plan to officers and concluded that a supplemental retirement plan was needed for corporate officers who were not participants in the original frozen Pension Equalization Plan. In 2007, the Board of Directors approved the 2007 Pension Equalization Plan and designated the four corporate officers, including Mr. Evans, who were not participants in the Original Pension Equalization Plan as participants in the 2007 Pension Equalization Plan. The four participants were given years of credited service equal to the number of years they served as a corporate officer. Mr. Evans received two years of credited service. Mr. Cleberg was named a participant in the 2007 Pension Equalization Plan effective with his employment with the Company in 2008. He did not receive any years of credited service.
32
A participant under the 2007 Pension Equalization Plan does not qualify for benefits until the benefits become vested under the following vesting schedule. The vesting is based on age at termination and years of service under the plan, not total years of service with the Company.
Age at Termination of Employment or Discontinuance of Participation
|
Vesting % | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Under age 55 |
0 | % | ||
Age 55 with less than 10 years of service |
0 | % | ||
Age 55 with over 10 years of service |
100 | % | ||
Age 65 or over |
100 | % | ||
Upon death or disability |
100 | % |
The annual benefit is 2 percent of the employee's average earnings multiplied by the participant's years of service as an officer (up to a maximum of 15 years) and the vesting percentage. Average earnings are normally an employee's average earnings for the five highest consecutive full years of employment during the ten full years of employment immediately preceding the year of calculation. The annual 2007 Pension Equalization Plan benefit is paid on a monthly basis for 15 years to each participating employee commencing at the later of 55 years of age or the date of the participant's termination of employment, unless the participant has elected otherwise. In the event of the participant's death before payment of the benefit begins, the vested benefit shall commence at the later of the date the participant would have attained age 55 years of age or the date of the participant's death. A participant or participant's beneficiary that receives payments under the plan prior to the participant attaining age 62 (or in the case of a beneficiary, would have attained age 62) shall receive such benefits subject to a discount of such benefits according to the same schedule as for the Grandfathered and 2005 Pension Equalization Plans shown above.
Pension Restoration Benefit. In the event that at the time of a participant's retirement, the participant's salary level exceeds the qualified pension plan annual compensation limitation ($230,000 in 2008) or includes nonqualified deferred compensation, then the participant shall receive an additional benefit, called a "Pension Restoration Benefit," which is measured by the difference between (i) the monthly benefit which would have been provided to the participant under the Defined Benefit Pension Plan as if there were no annual compensation limitation and no exclusion on nonqualified deferred compensation, and (ii) the monthly benefit to be provided to the participant under the Defined Benefit Pension Plan. The Pension Restoration Benefit applies to participants in the Pension Equalization Plans.
33
NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION FOR 2008
We have a Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan for a select group of management or highly compensated employees. The aggregate plan earnings for 2008 and the aggregate balance as of December 31, 2008 for our Named Executive Officers are shown in the following table. Our Named Executive Officers made no contributions and received no withdrawals or distributions from the plan in 2008. In addition, we made no contributions to the plan in 2008.
Name
|
Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($)(1) |
Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End ($)(1) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
David R. Emery |
| | |||||
Anthony S. Cleberg |
| | |||||
Mark T. Thies |
$ | 18,904 | $ | 326,405 | |||
Thomas M. Ohlmacher |
$ | 38,053 | $ | 748,812 | |||
Linden R. Evans |
| | |||||
Steven J. Helmers |
| |
Eligibility to participate in the plan is determined by the Compensation Committee and currently consists of only corporate officers. Eligible employees may elect to defer up to 50 percent of their base salary, up to 100 percent of their Short-Term Annual Incentive Plan award, including Company stock, and elect to defer restricted stock grants in the form of restricted stock units. The deferrals are deposited into a trust account where the participants may direct the investment of the deferrals (except for Company stock and restricted stock unit deferrals) as allowed by the plan. The investment options are the same as those offered to all employees in the 401(k) Plan except for a fixed rate option which was set at 5.54 percent in 2008. Investment earnings are credited to the participants' accounts. Upon retirement, we will distribute the account balance to the participant according to the distribution election filed with the Compensation Committee. The participants may elect either a lump sum payment to be paid within 30 days of retirement (requires a six month deferral for benefits not vested as of December 31, 2004), or annual or monthly installments over a period of years designated by the participant, but not to exceed 15 years.
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL
The following table describes the potential payments and benefits under our compensation and benefit plans and arrangements to which our Named Executive Officers would be entitled upon termination of employment. Except for (i) certain terminations following a change in control ("CIC") of the Company, as described below, (ii) pro-rata payout of incentive compensation and the acceleration of vesting of equity awards upon retirement, death or disability, and (iii) certain pension and nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements described under Pension Benefits for 2008 and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for 2008 above, there are no agreements, arrangements or plans that entitle the Named Executive Officers to severance, perquisites, or other enhanced benefits upon termination of their employment. Any agreement to provide such other payments or benefits to a terminating executive officer would be in the discretion of the Compensation Committee.
The amounts shown below assume that such termination was effective as of December 31, 2008, and thus include estimates of the amounts which would be paid out to our Named Executive Officers upon their termination. The table does not include amounts such as base salary, short-term incentives and stock awards which the Named Executive Officers earned due to employment through
34
December 31, 2008 and distributions of vested benefits such as those described under Pension Benefits for 2008, Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for 2008 and vested stock options listed in the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2008 tables. The table also does not include a value for outplacement services because this would be a diminimus amount. The actual amounts to be paid out can only be determined at the time of such Named Executive Officer's separation from the Company. Mr. Thies is not included in the table because he was not employed by the Company on December 31, 2008. For a discussion of the amounts paid to Mr. Thies in connection with his separation from us, see the discussion under the caption "Severance Agreement".
|
Cash Severance Payment |
Incremental Pension Benefit (present value)(2) |
Continuation of Medical/ Welfare Benefits (present value)(3) |
Acceleration of Equity Awards(4) |
Excise Tax and Gross-up(5) |
Total Termination Benefits |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
David R. Emery |
|||||||||||||||||||
Retirement |
| | | $ | 214,305 | | $ | 214,305 | |||||||||||
Death or disability |
| | | $ | 612,855 | | $ | 612,855 | |||||||||||
Involuntary termination |
| | | | | | |||||||||||||
CIC |
| | | $ | 612,855 | | $ | 612,855 | |||||||||||
Involuntary or good reason termination after CIC(1) |
$ | 2,866,812 | $ | 637,800 | $ | 247,500 | $ | 612,855 | $ | 1,449,024 | $ | 5,813,991 | |||||||
Anthony S. Cleberg |
|||||||||||||||||||
Retirement |
| | | | | | |||||||||||||
Death or disability |
| | | $ | 184,703 | | $ | 184,703 | |||||||||||
Involuntary termination |
| | | | | | |||||||||||||
CIC |
| | | $ | 184,703 | | $ | 184,703 | |||||||||||
Involuntary or good reason termination after CIC(1) |
$ | 913,500 | | $ | 112,800 | $ | 184,703 | $ | 372,624 | $ | 1,583,627 | ||||||||
Thomas M. Ohlmacher |
|||||||||||||||||||
Retirement |
| | | $ | 140,165 | | $ | 140,165 | |||||||||||
Death or disability |
| | | $ | 324,167 | | $ | 324,167 | |||||||||||
Involuntary termination |
| | | | | | |||||||||||||
CIC |
| | | $ | 324,167 | | $ | 324,167 | |||||||||||
Involuntary or good reason termination after CIC(1) |
$ | 1,053,000 | $ | 379,800 | $ | 27,800 | $ | 324,167 | | $ | 1,784,767 | ||||||||
Linden R. Evans |
|||||||||||||||||||
Retirement |
| | | $ | 88,267 | | $ | 88,267 | |||||||||||
Death or disability |
| | | $ | 288,418 | | $ | 288,418 | |||||||||||
Involuntary termination |
| | | | | | |||||||||||||
CIC |
| | | $ | 288,418 | | $ | 288,418 | |||||||||||
Involuntary or good reason termination after CIC(1) |
$ | 822,000 | $ | 69,400 | $ | 194,900 | $ | 288,418 | $ | 399,642 | $ | 1,774,360 | |||||||
Steven J. Helmers |
|||||||||||||||||||
Retirement |
| | | $ | 61,873 | | $ | 61,873 | |||||||||||
Death or disability |
| | | $ | 195,810 | | $ | 195,810 | |||||||||||
Involuntary termination |
| | | | | | |||||||||||||
CIC |
| | | $ | 195,810 | | $ | 195,810 | |||||||||||
Involuntary or good reason termination after CIC(1) |
$ | 729,000 | $ | 245,400 | $ | 126,800 | $ | 195,810 | | $ | 1,297,010 |
35
In the event of a change in control or an involuntary or good reason termination after a change in control, the acceleration of equity awards represents the acceleration of unvested restricted stock, the payout of the pro-rata share of the performance shares calculated as if the performance period ended on December 31, 2008 for the January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2009 and January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2010 performance periods.
The valuation of the restricted stock was based upon the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2008 and the valuation of the performance shares was based on the average closing price of our common stock for the last 20 trading days of 2008. Actual amounts to be paid out at the time of separation from the Company may vary significantly based upon the market value of our common stock at that time.
Payments Made Upon Termination. Regardless of the manner in which a Named Executive Officer's employment terminates, he may be entitled to receive amounts earned during his term of employment. These include:
Payments Made Upon Retirement: In the event of retirement of a Named Executive Officer, in addition to the items identified above, he will also receive the benefit of the following:
36
Payments Made Upon Death or Disability. In the event of death or disability of a Named Executive Officer, in addition to the items identified above, he will also receive the benefit of the following:
Payments Made Upon a Change in Control. Our Named Executive Officers have change in control agreements that terminate June 1, 2011. These agreements replaced the prior change in control agreements that expired June 1, 2008. The renewal of the change in control agreements is at the discretion of the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee conducted a thorough review of the change in control agreements in the first quarter of 2008, prior to the June 1, 2008 expiration date of the prior agreements. The change in control agreements provide for certain payments and other benefits to be payable upon a change in control and a subsequent termination of employment, either involuntary or for a good reason.
A change in control is defined in the agreements as:
In the change in control agreements, a good reason for termination which would trigger payment of benefits is defined to include:
37
Upon a change in control, the CEO will have an employment contract for a three-year period and the non-CEO executive will have an employment contract for a two-year period, but not beyond age 65 ("employment term"). During this employment term, the executive shall receive annual compensation at least equal to the highest rate in effect at any time during the one-year period preceding the change in control and shall also receive employment welfare benefits, pension benefits, and supplemental retirement benefits on a basis no less favorable than those received prior to the change in control. Annual compensation is defined to include amounts which are includable in the gross income of the executive for federal income tax purposes, including base salary, targeted annual incentive bonus, targeted long-term incentive grants and awards; and matching contributions or other benefits payable under the 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan; but exclude restricted stock awards, performance units or stock options that become vested or exercisable pursuant to a change in control.
If a Named Executive Officer's employment is terminated prior to the end of the employment term by the Company for cause or disability, by reason of the Named Executive Officer's death, or by the Named Executive Officer without good reason, the Named Executive Officer will receive all amounts of compensation earned or accrued through the termination date. If the Named Executive Officer's employment is terminated because of death or disability, the Named Executive Officer or his beneficiaries will also receive a pro rata bonus equal to 100 percent of the target bonus for the portion of the year served.
If the CEO's employment is terminated during the employment term (other than by reason of death) (i) by the Company other than for cause or disability, or (ii) by the CEO for a good reason, then the CEO is entitled to the following benefits:
38
If the non-CEO executive's employment is terminated during the employment term (other than by death) (i) by the Company other than for cause or disability, or (ii) by the non-CEO for a good reason; then the non-CEO is entitled to the following benefits:
The change in control agreements contain an additional benefit to cover any excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The executive must sign a waiver and release agreement in order to receive the severance payment.
Effective January 18, 2008, we entered into a Severance and Release Agreement with Mark T. Thies, whose resignation from the Company occurred on that date. The agreement provided for payment of a severance amount of $350,000, reimbursement of COBRA premium cost of continued healthcare coverage for a period of twelve months and outplacement assistance.
39
Director Fees
In 2008, our non-employee director compensation was as follows:
In addition, our Presiding Director and Committee Chairpersons received the following additional compensation:
Director Stock Ownership Guidelines
Members of our Board of Directors are required to beneficially own 500 shares of common stock when they are initially elected a director and to apply at least 50 percent of his or her annual cash retainer toward the purchase of additional shares until the director has accumulated at least 4,000 shares of common stock. All of our directors have currently met their stock ownership guidelines.
Director Total Compensation for 2008 and Common Stock Equivalents Outstanding
as of December 31, 2008(1)
Name(2)
|
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash |
Stock Awards(3) |
Total | Number of Common Stock Equivalents Outstanding at December 31, 2008(4) |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
David C. Ebertz |
$ | 71,000 | $ | 50,000 | $ | 121,000 | 6,940 | ||||||
Jack W. Eugster |
$ | 69,750 | $ | 50,000 | $ | 119,750 | 4,383 | ||||||
John R. Howard |
$ | 83,500 | $ | 50,000 | $ | 133,500 | 13,023 | ||||||
Kay S. Jorgensen |
$ | 86,000 | $ | 50,000 | $ | 136,000 | 8,802 | ||||||
Stephen D. Newlin |
$ | 67,250 | $ | 50,000 | $ | 117,250 | 4,580 | ||||||
Gary L. Pechota |
$ | 64,750 | $ | 50,000 | $ | 114,750 | 2,027 | ||||||
Warren L. Robinson |
$ | 66,750 | $ | 50,000 | $ | 116,750 | 2,184 | ||||||
John B. Vering |
$ | 72,250 | $ | 50,000 | $ | 122,250 | 3,813 | ||||||
Thomas J. Zeller |
$ | 84,750 | $ | 50,000 | $ | 134,750 | 7,307 |
40
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS
The following tables set forth the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 13, 2009 for each director, each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table, all of our directors and executive officers as a group, and each person or entity known by us to beneficially own more than five percent of our outstanding shares of common stock. Beneficial ownership includes shares a director or executive officer has the power to vote or transfer, and stock options that are exercisable currently or within 60 days of March 13, 2009.
Except as otherwise indicated by footnote below, we believe that each individual or entity named has sole investment and voting power with respect to the shares of common stock indicated as beneficially owned by that individual or entity.
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned(1) |
Options Exercisable Within 60 Days |
Directors Common Stock Equivalents(2) |
Total | Percentage(3) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Directors and Named Executive Officers |
||||||||||||||||
Anthony S. Cleberg |
13,414 |
13,414 |
* |
|||||||||||||
David C. Ebertz |
6,308 | 7,800 | 14,108 | * | ||||||||||||
David R. Emery(4) |
93,253 | 68,882 | 162,135 | * | ||||||||||||
Jack W. Eugster |
8,000 | 5,190 | 13,190 | * | ||||||||||||
Linden R. Evans |
36,040 | 10,000 | 46,040 | * | ||||||||||||
Steven J. Helmers(5) |
34,213 | 19,110 | 53,323 | * | ||||||||||||
John R. Howard |
16,864 | 14,008 | 30,872 | * | ||||||||||||
Kay S. Jorgensen |
7,259 | 9,700 | 16,959 | * | ||||||||||||
Stephen D. Newlin |
2,571 | 5,391 | 7,962 | * | ||||||||||||
Thomas M. Ohlmacher |
49,697 | 2,500 | 52,197 | * | ||||||||||||
Gary L. Pechota |
4,063 | 2,785 | 6,848 | * | ||||||||||||
Warren L. Robinson(6) |
4,084 | 2,945 | 7,029 | * | ||||||||||||
Mark T. Thies |
13,552 | 13,552 | * | |||||||||||||
John B. Vering(7) |
2,687 | 4,608 | 7,295 | * | ||||||||||||
Thomas J. Zeller(8) |
5,097 | 8,174 | 13,271 | * | ||||||||||||
All directors and executive officers as a group (24 persons) |
419,248 | 253,184 | 60,601 | 733,033 | 1.9 | % |
41
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned |
Percentage | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Five Percent Shareholders |
||||||||
Barclays Global Investors, NA, Barclays Global Fund Advisors and Barclays Global Investors, Ltd., et. al.(1) |
4,506,913 |
11.6 |
% |
|||||
400 Howard Street |
||||||||
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.(2) |
2,751,707 |
7.1 |
% |
|||||
100 East Pratt Street |
Proposal 2
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent registered public accountants, conducted the audit of Black Hills Corporation and its subsidiaries for 2008. Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP will be present at our annual meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement, if they desire to do so, and to respond to appropriate questions.
Our Audit Committee, subject to ratification by our shareholders, has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP to perform an audit of our consolidated financial statements and those of our subsidiaries for the year 2009 and to render their reports. If shareholder approval for the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP is not obtained, the Audit Committee will reconsider the appointment.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP to serve as our independent registered public accountants for the year 2009
42
FEES PAID TO THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The following table sets forth the aggregate fees for services provided to us for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 by our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP.
|
2008 | 2007(1) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Audit Fees |
$ | 2,946,600 | $ | 1,888,100 | ||||
Audit-Related Fees |
151,800 | 271,465 | ||||||
Tax Fees |
1,160,730 | 541,320 | ||||||
Total Fees |
$ | 4,259,130 | $ | 2,700,885 |
Audit Fees. Fees for professional services rendered for the audits of our consolidated financial statements, review of the interim consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports, opinions on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, and services that generally only the independent auditor can reasonably provide, such as comfort letters, statutory audits, consents and assistance with and review of documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Approximately $940,000 of the cost in 2008 is related to the audit of the five utilities acquired from Aquila.
Audit-Related Fees. Fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements and are not reported under "Audit Fees." These services include internal control reviews; attest services that are not required by statute or regulation; employee benefit plan audits; due diligence, consultations and audits related to mergers and acquisitions; and consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.
Tax Fees. Fees for services related to tax compliance, and tax planning and advice including tax assistance with tax audits. These services include assistance regarding federal, state and Canadian tax compliance and advice, review of tax returns, and federal, state and Canadian tax planning. Approximately $594,000 of the cost in 2008 is related to tax planning associated with the acquisition of five utilities from Aquila and the divestiture of seven independent power plants.
The services performed by Deloitte & Touche LLP were pre-approved in accordance with the Audit Committee's pre-approval policy whereby the Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accountants. The Audit Committee will generally pre-approve a list of specific services and categories of services, including audit, audit-related, tax and other services, for the upcoming or current fiscal year, subject to a specified cost level. Any service that is not included in the approved list of services must be separately pre-approved by the Audit Committee. Further approval by the Audit Committee is also required if any previously approved service exceeds estimated or budgeted amounts by 25 percent, or if the sum of all pre-approval services exceeds budgeted amounts by 10 percent in the aggregate.
43
In connection with the financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, the Audit Committee has:
Based upon these reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the Company's audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE | ||
Thomas J. Zeller, Chairperson John R. Howard Warren L. Robinson John B. Vering |
Our Board of Directors does not intend to present any business for action by our shareholders at the meeting except the matters referred to in this proxy statement. If any other matters should be properly presented at the meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying form of proxy to vote thereon in accordance with the recommendations of our Board of Directors.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2010 ANNUAL MEETING
Shareholder proposals intended to be presented at our 2010 annual meeting of shareholders and considered for inclusion in our proxy materials must be received by our Corporate Secretary in writing at our executive offices at 625 Ninth Street, P.O. Box 1400, Rapid City, South Dakota 57709, prior to December 8, 2009. Any proposal submitted must be in compliance with Rule 14a-8 of Regulation 14A of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Additionally, a shareholder may submit a proposal for consideration at our 2010 annual meeting of shareholders, but not for inclusion of the proposal in our proxy materials, if the shareholder gives timely written notice of such proposal in accordance with Article I, Section 9 of our Bylaws. In general, Article I, Section 9 provides that, to be timely, a shareholder's notice must be delivered to our Corporate Secretary in writing not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of shareholders.
Our 2009 annual meeting is scheduled for May 19, 2009. Ninety days prior to the first anniversary of this date will be February 18, 2010, and 120 days prior to the first anniversary of this date will be January 19, 2010. For business to be properly requested by the shareholder to be brought before the 2010 annual meeting of shareholders, the shareholder must comply with all of the requirements of Article I, Section 9 of our Bylaws, not just the timeliness requirements set forth above.
44
In accordance with a notice sent to eligible shareholders who share a single address, we are sending only one annual report and proxy statement to that address unless we receive instructions to the contrary from any shareholder at that address. This practice, known as "householding," is designed to reduce our printing and postage costs. However, if a shareholder of record residing at such an address wishes to receive a separate annual report or proxy statement in the future, he or she may contact Shareholder Relations at the below address. Eligible shareholders of record receiving multiple copies of our annual report and proxy statement can request householding by contacting us in the same manner. Shareholders who own shares through a bank, broker or other nominee can request householding by contacting the nominee.
We hereby undertake to deliver promptly, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the annual report to shareholders, or proxy statement, as applicable, to our shareholders at a shared address to which a single copy of the document was delivered.
Shareholder Relations Black Hills Corporation P.O. Box 1400 Rapid City, SD 57709 (605) 721-1700 |
Please vote your shares by telephone, by the Internet or by promptly returning the accompanying form of proxy, whether or not you expect to be present at the meeting.
45
A copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K (excluding exhibits), for the year ended December 31, 2008, which is required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, will be made available to shareholders to whom this Proxy Statement is mailed, without charge, upon written or oral request to Shareholder Relations, Black Hills Corporation, P.O. Box 1400, Rapid City, SD 57709, Telephone Number: (605) 721-1700. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K also may be accessed through our website at www.blackhillscorp.com.
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
FOR THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 19, 2009
Shareholders may view this proxy statement, our form of proxy and our 2008 Annual Report to Shareholders over the Internet by accessing our website at www.blackhillscorp.com. Information on our website does not constitute a part of this proxy statement.
|
By Order of the Board of Directors, | |
|
||
|
ROXANN R. BASHAM Vice PresidentGovernance and Corporate Secretary |
Dated: April 7, 2009
46
BLACK HILLS CORPORATION
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
9:30 a.m., Local Time
The Dahl Arts Center
713 Seventh Street
Rapid City, SD 57701
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:
The Notice and Proxy Statement and our 2008 Annual Report to Shareholders are available at www.blackhillscorp.com.
P.O. Box 1400, Rapid City, SD 57709 |
|
PROXY |
This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors for use at the Annual Meeting on May 19, 2009.
The undersigned hereby appoints David R. Emery and Anthony S. Cleberg, and each of them, with full power of substitution, to vote all shares of the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at 9:30 a.m., local time, May 19, 2009, at The Dahl Arts Center, 713 Seventh Street, Rapid City, SD 57701, and at any adjournment thereof, upon all subjects that may properly come before the meeting, including the matters described in the Proxy Statement furnished herewith.
Your vote is important! Ensure that your shares are represented at the meeting. Either (1) submit your proxy by touchtone telephone, (2) submit your proxy by Internet, or (3) mark, date, sign, and return this proxy in the envelope provided. If no directions are given, the proxies will vote in accordance with the Board of Directors recommendation on all matters listed on this proxy, and at their discretion on any other matters that may properly come before the meeting.
See reverse for voting instructions.
|
COMPANY # |
VOTE BY INTERNET, TELEPHONE OR MAIL
24 HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK
Your phone or Internet vote authorizes the named Proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card.
VOTE BY INTERNET www.eproxy.com/bkh
Use the Internet to vote your proxy until 12:00 p.m. (CT) on May 18, 2009.
VOTE BY PHONE 1-800-560-1965
Use any touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy until 12:00 p.m. (CT) on May 18, 2009.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided.
If you vote your proxy by Internet or by Telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your Voting Instruction Card.
TO VOTE BY MAIL AS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS ON ALL ITEMS BELOW,
SIMPLY SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD
The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote FOR Items 1 and 2.
1. |
|
Election of Directors: |
01 David C. Ebertz |
Vote FOR |
o |
|
Vote WITHHELD |
o |
|||||
|
|
|
02 John R. Howard |
all nominees |
|
from all nominees |
|||||||
|
|
|
03 Stephen D. Newlin |
(except as marked) |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
(Instructions: To cumulate votes for any indicated nominee, write the number of the nominee and the number of shares for such nominee in the box provided to the right.) |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
For |
Against |
Abstain |
||||||
2. |
|
Ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP to serve as Black Hills Corporations independent registered public accounting firm for 2009. |
o |
o |
o |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, WILL BE VOTED FOR ITEMS 1 AND 2. |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Address change? Mark Box Indicate changes below: o |
|
|
|
||||||||||
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
Signature(s) Box |
|
|
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear on Proxy. If held in joint tenancy, all persons must sign. Trustees, administrators, etc., should include title and authority. Corporations should provide full name of corporation and title of authorized officer signing the proxy. |