UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ý         Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005

or

o         Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Commission File No. 001-31257

ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  ý    No  o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15 (d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o    No  ý

Note:  Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act  from their obligations under those Sections.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days      Yes  ý    No  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):

Large accelerated filer ý            Accelerated filer  o            Non-accelerated filer  o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes o    No  ý

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates is approximately $2.1 billion based upon the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange as of June 24, 2005.

Common Stock outstanding as of February 28, 2006:  68,450,579 shares (including 1,397 shares held in treasury).

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Part III incorporates certain information by reference from the registrant’s proxy statement for the 2006 annual meeting of stockholders, which proxy statement will be filed no later than 120 days after the close of the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

PART I

Item 1. Business

AMO was incorporated in Delaware in October 2001 as a subsidiary of Allergan, Inc. (Allergan). Allergan spun-off our company to its stockholders by way of a distribution of all of our shares of common stock on June 29, 2002. As a result of our spin-off from Allergan, we are an independent public company, and Allergan has no continuing stock ownership in us. Unless the context requires otherwise, references to “AMO”, the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” refer to Allergan’s optical medical device business for the periods prior to June 29, 2002 and to Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. and its subsidiaries for the periods on or after such date.

Overview

We are a global leader in the development, manufacture and marketing of medical devices for the eye. We have two major product lines: ophthalmic surgical and eye care. Our ophthalmic surgical product line provides medical devices for use in the cataract / implant and laser vision correction markets. In the cataract and implant market, we focus on the four key products required for cataract surgery – foldable intraocular lenses, or IOLs, implantation systems, phacoemulsification systems and viscoelastics. In the laser vision correction market, we market laser systems, diagnostic devices, treatment cards and microkeratomes for use in laser eye surgery. Our eye care product line provides a full range of contact lens care products for use with most types of contact lenses. These products include single-bottle, multi-purpose cleaning and disinfecting solutions, hydrogen peroxide-based disinfecting solutions, daily cleaners, enzymatic cleaners and contact lens rewetting drops. In addition, we sell contact lenses in Europe and Asia. Our products are sold in approximately 60 countries and we have direct operations in over 20 countries.

In June 2004, we completed our acquisition of Pfizer Inc.’s surgical ophthalmic business, which expanded our viscoelastic and IOL product offerings, allowing us to offer a more comprehensive portfolio of products required to perform cataract surgery. We acquired the Healon family of viscoelastic products and the Tecnis and CeeOn IOL brands. The addition of the Healon family, one of the leading viscoelastic brands, significantly expanded our viscoelastic product line. The Tecnis and CeeOn IOL brands further strengthened our position in the ophthalmic surgery market with the Tecnis Multifocal IOL brand further expanding our refractive IOL portfolio. We also acquired the Baerveldt glaucoma shunt, or drainage device, which provided an entry for us into the glaucoma market.

In May 2005, we acquired VISX, Incorporated, the global leader in laser vision correction. As a result of the VISX acquisition, we are a leader in the design and development of proprietary technologies and systems for laser vision correction of refractive vision disorders. Our products include the VISX STAR Excimer Laser System, which is a fully integrated ophthalmic medical device incorporating an excimer laser and a computer driven workstation; the VISX WaveScan System, which is a diagnostic device that uses laser beam technology to measure comprehensive refractive errors of the eye and derive comprehensive refractive information about a patient’s individual optical system; and VISX treatment cards, which provide the user with specific access to proprietary software and are required to operate the VISX STAR Excimer Laser System.

Industry

Vision and Vision Impairment.

•            How Vision Works. Vision is enabled by the cornea and the lens, which work together to focus light, and the iris, which regulates the amount of light that passes through the cornea onto the retina. The retina contains light-sensitive receptors that transmit the image through the optic nerve to the brain.

•            Cataracts. Cataracts are an irreversible progressive ophthalmic condition in which the eye’s natural lens loses its usual transparency and becomes clouded and opaque. This clouding obstructs the passage of light to the retina and can eventually lead to blindness.

•            Refractive Disorders. Refractive disorders, such as myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism and presbyopia, occur when the lens system is unable to properly focus images on the retina. For example, with myopia (nearsightedness), light rays focus in front of the retina because the curvature of the cornea is too steep. With hyperopia (farsightedness), light rays focus behind the retina because the curvature of the cornea is too flat. Astigmatism makes it difficult for a person to focus on any object because the otherwise uniform curvature of the cornea or lens is somehow disrupted or becomes uneven. Presbyopia is the progressive loss of flexibility of the lens and its ability to change shape to focus on near or far objects, and is presumably caused by aging of the eye’s lens and the muscles that control the shape of the lens.

1

Ophthalmic Surgical Products Market. Ophthalmic surgical products generally are designed to correct impaired vision through minimally invasive surgical procedures. As the eye ages, the prevalence of cataracts and refractive disorders generally increases. We believe that an aging population, introduction of new technologies and increasing market acceptance present opportunities for growth in the ophthalmic surgical market.

Cataract Treatment. The largest segment of the ophthalmic surgical products market is the treatment of cataracts. Cataract extraction followed by IOL implantation is one of the most common surgical procedures performed in the United States and most other developed nations. As estimated by MarketScope, approximately 2.8 million cataract procedures were performed in the United States and over 13.3 million cataract procedures were performed worldwide in 2005. MarketScope estimates that the global cataract surgery market, which includes sales of IOLs, phacoemulsification equipment, viscoelastics and other related products, was approximately $3.1 billion in 2005 and is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of approximately 9% from 2005 to 2010. The data in this report attributed to MarketScope is used with the permission of MarketScope.

During cataract surgery, patients are often treated using phacoemulsification, a process that uses ultrasound waves to break the natural lens into tiny fragments that can be removed from the eye. Viscoelastics are used during cataract surgery to protect the inner layer of the cornea, provide lubrication and maintain space in the anterior chamber of the eye and the capsular bag in the posterior chamber (which houses the lens), allowing the eye to maintain its shape.

The following table sets forth the estimated revenues for each component of the global cataract surgery market in its various components for the year 2005 according to MarketScope (in millions):

                Refractive Vision Correction. Another segment of the ophthalmic surgical market is the surgical treatment of refractive disorders.

LASIK

The most common refractive surgery procedure is laser surgery, and the most common surgical technique for treating refractive disorders is laser assisted in-situ keratomileusis, or LASIK. LASIK involves the use of an automated cutting device to cut a thin corneal flap, which is then pulled back to expose the underlying tissue, which is treated using an excimer laser to achieve vision correction. The most common cutting device is called a microkeratome.

As a result of the VISX acquisition, we are a leader in the design and development of proprietary technologies and systems for laser vision correction of refractive vision disorders. Laser vision correction (LVC) eliminates or reduces reliance on eyeglasses or contact lenses. It employs a computerized laser that ablates, or removes, sub-micron layers of tissue from the cornea, reshaping the eye and thereby improving vision.

Standard LASIK was introduced in the mid 1990’s. In performing Standard LASIK, an ophthalmologist conducts a traditional eye examination to determine the prescription required to correct the patient’s vision. The prescription is then programmed into the laser system, which calculates the ablation needed to make a precise corneal correction to treat nearsightedness, farsightedness, and astigmatism. Unlike Custom LASIK (see below), Standard LASIK cannot correct higher order aberrations.

The most advanced method of performing laser vision correction is Custom LASIK. Custom LASIK employs a diagnostic evaluation of the eye that measures refractive errors in the patient’s vision more precisely than previously available technology. The diagnostic device obtains comprehensive information about the imperfections, or refractive errors, of each patient’s vision. Refractive errors are displayed by the diagnostic device in the form of an aberration map that offers a unique pattern for each patient’s eye, similar to a fingerprint. The map displays information about refractive errors that result in nearsightedness, farsightedness, and astigmatism, as well as information about higher order aberrations that were not previously measurable by any other instrument.

2

The information from the diagnostic device is used to generate a personalized treatment plan that is digitally transferred to the laser system. The ablation derived from this information is therefore customized to the individual’s eye.

Laser vision correction can also be performed by photorefractive keratectomy (“PRK”). PRK does not require the use of a microkeratomes, and the epithelial layer (or outer layer) of the cornea is removed before ablation. Patients may experience discomfort for approximately 24 hours and blurred vision for approximately 48 to 72 hours after the procedure. Drops to promote corneal healing and alleviate discomfort may be prescribed. Although most patients experience significant improvement in uncorrected vision (vision without the aid of eyeglasses or contact lenses) within a few days of the procedure, unlike LASIK it generally takes several months for the final correction to stabilize and for the full benefit of the procedure to be realized.

IOLs. Surgical implantation of IOLs may be used to treat those patients with refractive disorders. Phakic IOLs can be implanted in front or in back of the iris and work in conjunction with the patient’s natural lens to treat refractive disorders. Multifocal IOLs address near, intermediate and distance vision and are approved for non-cataract procedures outside of the United States. Other procedures, such as replacing the patient’s natural lens with an accommodating IOL for refractive vision correction, are also being developed.

Eye Care Market. As the use of contact lenses has become increasingly popular, the demand for disinfecting solutions, daily cleaners, enzymatic cleaners and contact lens rewetting drops has increased. We believe that the contact lens market growth is driven by technological advancements in lens materials and designs and broader adoption among younger wearers. In response to increasing popularity of more frequently replaceable lenses and consumer interest in more convenient lens care regimens, we believe the contact lens care market continues to evolve towards greater use of single-bottle, multi-purpose solutions and away from hydrogen peroxide-based solutions. This evolution has had an unfavorable impact on the global hydrogen peroxide market, which is concentrated in Japan and parts of Europe.

Overall, we believe that strong demographic trends, new lens materials and specialty lenses are fueling global increases in the number of contact lens wearers, especially in China and other Asia Pacific countries. We believe that this is contributing to overall growth in multi-purpose solutions. The exception to this positive dynamic is in Japan, where a higher than average percent of the market has moved to daily disposable contact lenses that use cleaning solutions only occasionally or not at all.

Finally, the eye care market includes artificial tear and contact lens rewetter products designed to relieve dryness associated with contact lens wear, environmental conditions and dry eye disease. We believe the global market for artificial tear products exceeds $500 million per year.

Our Products

Ophthalmic Surgical Product Line

Our ophthalmic surgical products business develops, manufactures and markets medical devices for the cataract / implant and laser vision correction markets, with a focus on technologically advanced products.

Cataract Surgery

We focus on the four key devices for the cataract surgery market:

•                  Foldable IOLs – Foldable IOLs are artificial lenses used to replace the human lens.

•                  Implantation systems – Implantation systems are designed and used specifically to implant IOLs during cataract surgery.

•                  Phacoemulsification systems – Phacoemulsification systems use ultrasound during small incision cataract surgery to break apart and remove the cloudy human lens prior to its replacement with an IOL.

•                  Viscoelastics – Viscoelastics provide a barrier of protection for the cornea during phacoemulsification and maintain the shape of the eye during IOL insertion.

Intraocular Lenses. As a leading provider of IOLs, we offer surgeons a choice of high quality, innovative foldable IOLs in both acrylic and silicone, together with our proprietary implantation systems, for use in minimally invasive cataract surgical procedures. We are the only company that offers a selection of IOLs in both silicone and acrylic materials in the United States, and

3

we offer both monofocal and multifocal designs. Sales of our IOLs represented approximately 28%, 32% and 34% of our net sales in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Our IOLs primarily include:

Monofocal Lenses

•                  Tecnis – the only foldable IOL with an aspheric surface and the only IOL to receive FDA approval for claims of improved functional vision, which results in quicker recognition of objects in lower-light conditions. The Tecnis lens is the only lens currently designated as a “new technology intraocular lens” by the U.S. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. With this designation, ambulatory surgery centers can receive $50 in additional reimbursement when implanting the Tecnis IOL.

•                  Sensar – an acrylic monofocal IOL, with the patented OptiEdge design, intended to reduce post-surgical posterior capsular opacification, in order to lessen the need for subsequent corrective laser procedures, and to reduce the potential for unwanted glare and reflections following implantation.

•                  ClariFlex – a silicone monofocal IOL, also with the OptiEdge design.

•                  PhacoFlex – a silicone monofocal IOL.

Multifocal and Refractive Lenses

•                  ReZoom – an acrylic multifocal IOL with optical zones that provide near, intermediate and distance vision, reducing that patient’s dependence on eyeglasses. The ReZoom IOL is also approved in Europe for the treatment of presbyopia.

•                  Tecnis Multifocal – a silicone multifocal IOL with a diffractive, aspheric lens surface is approved in Europe for treatment of presbyopia.

•                  Verisyse – a phakic IOL that works in conjunction with the human lens to treat high myopia

Implantation Systems. As a companion to our foldable IOLs, we market insertion systems for each of our foldable IOL models. The Unfolder, our proprietary series of implantation systems, which includes the Emerald, SilverT and Silver implantation systems, is used for insertion of our foldable IOLs. These systems assist the surgeon in achieving controlled release of the intraocular lens into the capsular bag through a small incision in the eye.

Phacoemulsification Systems. We are a leading provider of phacoemulsification systems, and have a range of systems to meet market needs. Phacoemulsification systems use disposable or reusable packs that are necessary to operate the equipment. The majority of our phacoemulsification product sales are from sales of these packs and related accessories. Sales of our phacoemulsification products represented approximately 9%, 10% and 11% of our net sales in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

We currently market the following phacoemulsification systems:

•                  Sovereign – our premier phacoemulsification system is designed to reduce procedure times and provide the surgeon with increased control. The Sovereign system is available with our proprietary Occlusion Mode and WhiteStar technology, which creates less heat and turbulence in the ocular environment, giving rise to the term “cold phaco” and enabling better patient outcomes. Our WhiteStar technology also permits the system to offer bimanual, micro-incision phaco, a procedure which gives surgeons more operating flexibility over traditional techniques.

•                  Sovereign Compact -is a mid-sized phacoemulsification system designed to meet surgeons’ needs for an advanced phacoemulsification system, with the same functionality of the Sovereign system, in a smaller, more portable size. The Sovereign Compact system is also available with Occlusion Mode and WhiteStar technology.

•                  Diplomax – is a small-sized phacoemulsification system designed for surgeons who need a less expensive and more portable machine. These systems do not include WhiteStar technology, but do employ Occlusion Mode technology.

Viscoelastics. We acquired from Pfizer in June 2004 the Healon family of viscoelastics, and as a result are a leading provider of viscoelastic products. The Healon family is one of the leading brands of viscoelastics and has significantly expanded the scale of our existing viscoelastic offering. The different characteristics associated with each Healon product, Healon, Healon GV and Healon5, provide surgeons with a range of viscoelastic choices that combine the familiarity of the Healon line

4

with advanced technologies to satisfy different surgical needs. Healon was the first viscoelastic introduced into the ophthalmic surgical product market and is known for its purity and ease of use. Healon GV is of a greater viscosity than the original Healon solution, which is designed for certain ophthalmic surgical procedures. Healon5 is the first and only viscoadaptive agent to exhibit properties of both cohesive and dispersive viscoelastics. Healon5 has the highest viscosity of any viscoelastic currently available and is designed to create and maintain a deep anterior chamber during surgery, which facilitates manipulation inside the eye. Sales of our viscoelastic products represented approximately 14%, 10% and 3% of our net sales in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Other Cataract Surgical Related Products. In addition to our IOLs, phacoemulsification equipment and viscoelastics, we also provide several ancillary products related to the cataract surgery market, including:

•                  Irrigating Solutions. We offer irrigating solutions for use in cataract surgery to help maintain space in the eye and to aid in removing residual tissue during phacoemulsification. Irrigating solutions are balanced saline solutions that are compatible with the natural fluid of the anterior segment of the eye.

•                  Custom Eye Trays. We work with partners in our local markets to offer custom eye trays to our customers. These custom eye trays typically consist of all of the ancillary items that a surgeon needs to use in a single cataract surgery, such as surgical knives, drapes, gloves and gowns. Our partners typically handle assembly, distribution and billing for the product and in most cases we receive a fee per tray from our partners.

•                  Capsular Tension Rings. In the United States, we sell the StabilEyes capsular tension ring, which is inserted into the capsular bag during cataract surgery and functions to stabilize the capsular bag during placement of an IOL. We also market and distribute the Inject-o-Ring capsular tension ring in Europe. We distribute these products under arrangements with Ophtec B.V. in the United States and Corneal in Europe, respectively.

Other Surgical Products

Glaucoma Implant. The Baerveldt glaucoma implant is indicated for use in patients with medically uncontrollable glaucoma and a poor surgical prognosis due to severe preexisting conditions. This can include: neovascular glaucoma, aphakic/pseudophakic glaucoma, failed conventional surgery, congenital glaucoma, and secondary glaucoma due to uveitis or epithelial down growth. Baerveldt glaucoma implants are available in three models, all of which feature a larger surface area plate than competing single-quadrant devices.

Laser Vision Correction

Our laser vision correction products include the following:

•                  VISX STAR Excimer Laser System – The VISX STAR System is a fully integrated ophthalmic medical device incorporating an excimer laser and a computer-driven workstation.

•                  VISX WaveScan System – The WaveScan System is a diagnostic device that uses laser beam technology to measure comprehensive refractive errors of the eye and complex mathematical algorithms to derive comprehensive refractive information about the patient’s individual optical system.

•                  VISX Treatment Cards – Our proprietary treatment cards control the use of the VISX STAR System.

•                  Microkeratomes – Surgeons use microkeratomes in LASIK procedures to cut a flap of corneal tissue before treatment with an excimer laser.

VISX STAR Excimer Laser System. The laser ablations produced by the VISX STAR System are the product of a variable diameter excimer laser beam scanning system. Seven beams that range in size from 0.65 to 6.5 millimeters are homogenized as they converge, scan, and rotate to produce a smooth ablation area on the eye. The VISX STAR System centers on the eye and tracks eye movements in three dimensions during the procedure. We also recently released our Iris Registration technology, the first fully automated method of aligning and registering wavefront corrections for CustomVue treatment. Iris Registration is designed to replace the current means of registration, which involves manual marking of the eye to assess rotational movement.

The VISX STAR System performs Standard LASIK, CustomVue laser vision correction, and PRK. It also performs specialized procedures known as Custom-CAP, which treats patients who previously had LVC surgery resulting in symptomatic

5

decentered ablations (a condition that affects fewer than 4,000 patients per year) and PhotoTherapeutic Keratectomy, or PTK, which treats corneas that are scarred or have irregularities from prior infection, trauma or underlying corneal disease.

VISX WaveScan System. The WaveScan System displays refractive information about the patient’s individual optical system in the form of an aberration map. This unique map, similar to a fingerprint for each patient’s eye, offers objective information about refractive errors associated with nearsightedness, farsightedness and astigmatism, as well as information about higher order aberrations that were previously unmeasurable by any other instrument.

VISX Treatment Cards. Each treatment card provides the user with specific access to proprietary software and is required to operate the VISX STAR System. Because treatment cards are required to perform procedures, there is a strong correlation between treatment card sales and the number of procedures performed on VISX STAR Systems. Types of VISX treatment cards include: VisionKey^® Cards for performing standard LASIK procedures, which in the United States carries a license fee for each procedure that is purchased; CustomVue Cards for performing Custom LASIK, which carry a worldwide license fee for each procedure that is purchased; Custom-CAP Cards for performing laser vision correction with a previously decentered ablation, which carry a worldwide license fee for each procedure that is purchased; and the PTK Card, which is offered to physicians at a nominal charge to treat certain types of corneal pathologies.

Microkeratomes. In the refractive surgery market, we are a worldwide distributor of the Amadeus and Amadeus II microkeratome system and SurePass microkeratome blades.

Eye Care Product Line

In the eye care market, we focus on creating products that make contact lenses more comfortable, simplify contact lens care and promote ocular health. Our eye care business develops, manufactures and markets a full range of contact lens care products for use with most types of contact lenses. Our comprehensive product offering includes single-bottle multi-purpose cleaning and disinfecting solutions and hydrogen peroxide-based disinfecting solutions to destroy harmful microorganisms in and on the surface of contact lenses; daily cleaners to remove undesirable film and deposits from contact lenses; enzymatic cleaners to remove protein deposits from contact lenses; and lens rewetting drops to provide added wearing comfort.

Multi-Purpose Solutions. We market our Complete brand single-bottle multi-purpose solutions, a convenient, one bottle chemical disinfecting system for soft contact lenses, on a worldwide basis. Complete MoisturePLUS is the first single-bottle, multi-purpose solution with dual demulcents to help prevent contact lens dryness and discomfort and promote ocular health. Sales of our multi-purpose solutions represented approximately 17%, 21% and 23% of our net sales in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. We also offer Complete Blink-N-Clean, a unique in-the-eye lens cleaning solution.

Hydrogen Peroxide-Based Solutions. We offer products that use hydrogen peroxide-based disinfection systems. Our leading hydrogen peroxide brands are the Oxysept 1 Step, Ultracare, Consept 1 Step and Consept F solutions. Sales of our hydrogen peroxide-based solutions represented approximately 9%, 14% and 16% of our net sales in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Lens Rewetting Solutions. We believe that dryness and discomfort are the reasons most often cited for discontinuing contact lens wear. We have introduced contact lens rewetting drops designed to provide prolonged lubrication and improved protection against dryness. Our products in this category include Complete and blink rewetting solutions.

Contact Lenses. In 2004, we entered the contact lens business outside of the United States with the introduction of the AquaVision monthly disposable contact lens.

Research and Development

Our long-term success is dependent on the introduction of new and innovative products in both the ophthalmic surgical and eye care businesses. Our research and development strategy is to develop proprietary products for vision correction that are safe and effective and address unmet needs. As we implement this strategy, we will seek to develop new products with measurable benefits such as increased practitioner productivity, better patient outcomes and reduced costs to health care payors and providers.

Research and development activities for our ophthalmic surgical business are focused on expanding our product portfolio for both cataract and refractive surgery. Within cataract surgery, we have focused on six areas of opportunity to provide superior outcomes:

6

•                  Small incision surgery – work with a variety of advanced lens materials to enable small incision surgery which results in less induced astigmatism, rapid stabilization of the wound and faster visual rehabilitation.

•                  Advances in phacoemulsification – technology providing surgeons with high levels of cutting efficiency but with less heat and turbulence directed into the ocular environment enabling potential for more effective and safer cataract extraction procedures.

•                  Restoring accommodation following cataract surgery – following cataract surgery, the eye may lose its ability to accommodate, or shift its field of focus.

•                  Improving quality of vision – advancements in optics and optical surface designs.

•                  Reducing posterior capsular opacification, or PCO, following cataract surgery — PCO is a clouding of the posterior portion of the intraocular lens that occurs in some patients following cataract surgery. Currently, treatment of moderate to severe PCO typically requires a laser procedure.

•                  Greater ease of use for practitioners – development of advanced insertion devices which allow for easier handling in the operating room and greater surgeon control.

•                  Correcting refractive error – advancements in laser assisted intrastromal keratoplasty (LASIK) through both standard and wavefront guided treatments.

•                  Adjunctive technologies for LASIK – pachymetry and wavefront guided mapping of the cornea for LASIK refractive error correction along with microkeratome technologies for creation of the corneal flap prior to laser ablation.

Current projects include expansion of our portfolio of IOLs with the launch of the Tecnis acrylic IOL. Other projects include developing easier to use insertion systems for our foldable IOLs that provide for faster and safer procedures, and advances to our high end phacoemulsification system including our proprietary WhiteStar software technology.

In addition to cataract surgery products, we are leveraging our expertise in IOL implant technology to the areas of the surgical correction of refractive errors such as the Verisyse phakic IOL and two multifocal IOLs, ReZoom Multifocal and Tecnis Multifocal. These areas represent largely unmet needs that are not addressed by current surgical procedures. Products that are currently under development include Veriflex, a foldable phakic IOL.

In the area of laser vision correction, our research and development efforts include expanding treatment applications for custom wavefront guided LASIK. For improved laser guided ablation, the Star S4 IR iris registration software was also launched in 2005. Further new product development includes advances in ablation technology, accuracy and reliability in wavefront capture and intraoperative monitoring.

Our research and development efforts in the eye care business are aimed at developing proprietary systems that are effective and more convenient for customers to use, which we believe will result in longer, more comfortable lens wear and a higher rate of compliance with recommended lens care procedures. Our efforts include seeking formulations that provide prolonged lubrication, improved protection against dryness and enhanced cleaning without irritation and ocular health. Our research and development efforts have resulted in the continued development of our flagship Complete brand multi-purpose solution and blink rewetter solutions, with further advancements currently in development. We are also working to develop over-the-counter artificial tear products.

We plan to supplement our research and development activities with a commitment to identifying and obtaining new technologies through in-licensing, technological collaborations and joint ventures, including the establishment of research relationships with academic institutions and individual researchers.

We spent approximately $61.6 million in 2005, $45.6 million in 2004 and $37.4 million in 2003 on research and development. Total research and development expense in 2005 was $552.4 million, including a non-cash in-process research and development charge of $490.8 million, and in 2004 was $73.7 million, including a non-cash in-process research and development charge of $28.1 million. Research and development spending represented 6.7%, 6.1%, and 6.2% of total net sales in 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively. We believe that the continuing introduction of new products supplied by our research and development efforts and in-licensing opportunities are critical to our success. There are, however, inherent uncertainties associated with the

7

research and development efforts and the regulatory process and we cannot assure you that any of our research projects will result in new products that we can commercialize.

Customers, Sales and Marketing

Customers. Our primary customers for our ophthalmic surgical products include surgeons who perform cataract surgeries, hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers. The primary customers for our eye care products include optometrists, opticians, ophthalmologists, retailers and clinics that sell directly to consumers. These retailers include mass merchandisers such as Wal-Mart, drug store chains such as Walgreen, hospitals, commercial optical chains and food stores. During 2005, no customer accounted for over 10% of our net sales.

Sales and Marketing. Our sales efforts and promotional activities with respect to our ophthalmic surgical products are primarily aimed at eye care professionals such as ophthalmologists who use our products. Similarly, our sales and promotional efforts in contact lens care are primarily directed towards optometrists, opticians, optical shops, ophthalmologists and consumers. We often provide samples of our eye care products to practitioners to distribute to their patients to encourage trial use of our solutions. In addition, we advertise in professional journals and have a direct mail program of descriptive product literature and scientific information that we provide to specialists in the eye care field. We have also developed training modules and seminars to update physicians regarding evolving technology. A number of our marketing programs include peer-to-peer marketing with practitioners educating other practitioners about the benefits of our products.

Recognizing the importance of our sales force’s expertise, we invest significant time and expense to provide training in such areas as product features and benefits. Training for our ophthalmic surgical products sales force focuses on providing sales personnel with technical knowledge regarding the scope and characteristics of the products they are selling and developing skills in presenting and demonstrating those products. In addition to providing product knowledge for communication to eye care practitioners, our eye care products sales force focuses on developing the necessary skills to sell to buyers for mass merchandisers and large drug store chains. This sales force also seeks to develop relationships with eye care professionals who may purchase our products and recommend them to their patients.

Each of our products is marketed under its brand name and our corporate name. We have a worldwide marketing organization which helps us to set overall marketing direction, promote consistent global brand positioning and allocate marketing resources to products and regions offering the greatest return. In order to remain sensitive to cultural differences and varying health care systems throughout the world, tactical execution of marketing programs and all sales activities are carried out at the regional level.

We also use third-party distributors for the distribution of our products in smaller geographic markets. No individual agent or distributor accounted for more than 10% of our net sales for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Traditionally, we have realized a seasonal trend in our sales, with the smallest portion of our cataract surgical business sales being realized in the first quarter and with sales gradually increasing from the second to fourth quarter. This has been driven predominantly by seasonality in the sales of capital equipment when customers increase spending as they reach their year end and are able to spend the remainder of their annual budgeted amounts. In the laser vision correction business, the seasonal trend favors the highest portion of sales in the first quarter. We expect to realize less seasonality in future periods as we seek to diversify our sales geographically and with more products that are less seasonal.

Manufacturing, Operations and Facilities

We manufacture eye care products at our facilities in Hangzhou, China, and Madrid, Spain, and we manufacture surgical products at our facilities in Santa Clara, California, Añasco, Puerto Rico, Groningen, Netherlands and Uppsala, Sweden. As part of our separation from Allergan, we entered into an agreement with Allergan under which Allergan manufactured eye care products for us at their facilities in Waco, Texas, Westport, Ireland, and Guarulhos, Brazil. Under this agreement, Allergan also manufactured our ophthalmic surgical product, Vitrax, at its Westport, Ireland facility. The manufacturing agreement terminated on June 29, 2005. We have transitioned products manufactured by Allergan to our Spain and China plants and to other third-party suppliers

As part of the transition from Allergan, in November 2003, we entered into an agreement with Nicholas Piramal India Limited for the supply of neutralizing tablets primarily used with our hydrogen-peroxide lens care products and unit dose solutions. Nicholas Piramal will be a sole-source supplier of these products. If supply of these products were interrupted, we cannot assure you that we would be able to obtain replacement products, and our eye care product sales may be negatively impacted in a material manner.

8

We have historically outsourced the manufacture of our phacoemulsification equipment to third parties, and we depend on single and limited sources for several key components. Our Sovereign system is manufactured by Carl Zeiss Ophthalmic Systems. Our manufacturing and supply arrangement will terminate in 2006 when we cease production of this product. Our Sovereign Compact system is manufactured by Sanmina-SCI under a manufacturing and supply agreement, which terminates in December 2007. If Carl Zeiss Ophthalmic Systems or Sanmina-SCI were to cease manufacturing any of these systems for any reason, we cannot assure you that we would be able to replace them on terms favorable to us, or at all.

The manufacture of VISX STAR Systems and WaveScan Systems is a complex operation involving numerous procedures, and the completed systems must pass a series of quality control and reliability tests before shipment. We buy from various independent suppliers many components that are either standard or built to our proprietary specifications, and which are then assembled at our California facility. We also contract with third parties for the manufacture or assembly of certain components. We depend on single and limited sources for several key components. Please see our risk factors for discussion of the risks related to our reliance on single and limited source vendors.

Governmental Regulation

United States. Our products and operations are subject to extensive and rigorous regulation by the FDA. The FDA regulates the research, testing, manufacturing, safety, labeling, storage, recordkeeping, promotion, distribution and production of medical devices in the United States to provide reasonable assurance that medical products distributed domestically are safe and effective for their intended uses. The Federal Trade Commission also regulates the advertising of our products.

Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, medical devices are classified into one of three classes – Class I, Class II or Class III – depending on the degree of risk associated with each medical device and the extent of control needed to provide reasonable assurances with respect to safety and effectiveness. Our current products are Class I, II and III medical devices, with most being classified as Class II devices and our IOLs being classified as Class III devices in the United States, subject to certain exceptions.

Class I devices are those for which safety and effectiveness can be reasonably assured by adherence to a set of guidelines, which include compliance with the applicable portions of the FDA’s Quality System Regulation, facility registration and product listing, reporting of adverse medical events, and appropriate, truthful and non-misleading labeling, advertising, and promotional materials, referred to as the general controls. Some Class I, also called Class I reserved, devices also require premarket clearance by the FDA through the 510(k) premarket notification process described below. Many Class I products are exempt from the premarket notification requirements.

Class II devices are those which are subject to the general controls and may require adherence to certain performance standards or other special controls (as specified by the FDA) and clearance by the FDA: Premarket review and clearance by the FDA for these devices is accomplished through the 510(k) premarket notification procedure. For most Class II devices, the manufacturer must submit to the FDA a premarket notification, demonstrating that the device is “substantially equivalent” to a legally marketed device.

If the FDA agrees that the device is substantially equivalent, it will grant clearance to commercially market the device. By regulation, the FDA is required to complete its review of a 510(k) within 90 days of submission of the notification. As a practical matter, clearance often takes longer. The FDA may require further information, including clinical data, to make a determination regarding substantial equivalence. If the FDA determines that the device, or its intended use, is not “substantially equivalent,” the FDA will place the device, or the particular use of the device, into Class III, and the device sponsor must then fulfill much more rigorous premarketing requirements, known as premarket approval.

A Class III product is a product which has a new intended use or uses advanced technology that is not substantially equivalent to a use or technology with respect to a legally marketed device, or for which there is not sufficient information to establish performance standards or special controls to provide reasonable assurance of the device’s safety and effectiveness and the product is represented to be for use in supporting or sustaining human life or for a use that is of substantial importance in preventing impairment of human health or presents a potential unreasonable risk of illness or injury. The safety and effectiveness of Class III devices cannot be reasonably assured solely by the general controls and the other requirements described above. Therefore, these devices almost always require formal clinical studies to demonstrate safety and effectiveness.

FDA approval of a premarket approval application is required before marketing a Class III product. The premarket approval application process is much more demanding than the 510(k) premarket notification process. A premarket approval application, which is intended to provide reasonable assurance that the device is safe and effective, must be supported by extensive data, including data from preclinical studies and human clinical trials and existing research material, and must contain a full description

9

of the device and its components, a full description of the methods, facilities and controls used for manufacturing, and proposed labeling. Following receipt of a premarket approval application, once the FDA determines that the application is sufficiently complete to permit a substantive review, the FDA will accept the application for review. The FDA, by statute and by regulation, has 180 days to review a filed premarket approval application, although the review of an application more often occurs over a significantly longer period of time, up to several years.

In approving a premarket approval application or clearing a 510(k) notification, the FDA may also require some form of postmarket surveillance, whereby the manufacturer follows certain patient groups for a number of years and makes periodic reports to the FDA on the clinical status of those patients when necessary to protect the public health or to provide additional safety and effectiveness data for the device.

When FDA approval of a device requires human clinical trials, and if the clinical trial presents a “significant risk” (as defined by the FDA) to human health, the device sponsor is required to file an investigational device exemption, or IDE, application with the FDA and obtain investigational device exemption approval prior to commencing the human clinical trial. If the clinical trial is considered a “nonsignificant risk,” investigational device exemption submission to the FDA is not required. Instead, only approval from the Institutional Review Board overseeing the clinical trial is required, although the study is still subject to FDA oversight under other provisions of the IDE regulation. Human clinical studies are generally required in connection with approval of Class III devices and to a much lesser extent for Class I and II devices. Clinical trials conducted abroad must also comply with local regulations.

Continuing Food and Drug Administration Regulation. After the FDA permits a device to enter commercial distribution, numerous regulatory requirements apply. These include:

•                  the registration and listing regulation, which requires manufacturers to register all manufacturing facilities and list all medical devices placed into commercial distribution;

•                  the Quality System Regulation, which requires manufacturers to follow elaborate design, testing, control, documentation and other quality assurance procedures during the manufacturing process;

•                  labeling regulations;

•                  the FDA’s general prohibition against promoting products for unapproved or “off-label” uses; and the Medical Device Reporting regulation, which requires that manufacturers report to the FDA if their device may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or malfunctioned in a way that would likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if it were to reoccur;

•                  Medical Device Reporting and recall requirements;

•                  Device tracking requirements; and

•                  Post Market surveillance requirements.

Failure to comply with the applicable U.S. medical device regulatory requirements could result in, among other things, warning letters, fines, injunctions, civil penalties, repairs, replacements, refunds, recalls or seizures of products, total or partial suspension of production, the FDA’s refusal to grant future premarket clearances or approvals, withdrawals or suspensions of current product applications, and criminal prosecution.

Governmental Reimbursement. In the United States, a significant percentage of the patients who receive our IOLs are covered by the federal Medicare program. When a cataract extraction with IOL implantation is performed in an ambulatory surgical center, Medicare provides the ambulatory surgical center with a fixed facility fee that includes a recommended $150 allowance to cover the cost of the IOL. After the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) (formerly the Health Care Financing Administration), awarded “new technology intraocular lens” status to our Tecnis IOL in 2006, the reimbursement rate for Tecnis IOLs implanted in ambulatory surgical centers increased to $200 until February 2011. When the procedure is performed in a hospital outpatient department, the hospital’s reimbursement is based on a prospective payment that includes payment for the IOL. The allowance is the same for all IOLs.

At the end of 2003, Congress enacted the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003. Among other things, this 1egislation requires CMS to establish a new Medicare payment system for services performed in

10

ambulatory surgical centers. This payment system is to be effective no sooner than January 1, 2006, and no later than January 1, 2008. At this time, it is not possible to determine how this new payment system could affect our revenues or financial condition.

In addition, if implemented, price controls or other cost-containment measures could materially and adversely affect our revenues and financial condition.

We cannot predict the likelihood or pace of any other significant legislative or regulatory action in these areas, nor can we predict whether or in what form health care legislation being formulated by various governments will be passed. Medicare reimbursement rates are subject to change at any time. We also cannot predict with precision what effect such governmental measures would have if they were ultimately enacted into law. In general, however, we believe that legislative and regulatory initiatives will likely continue, and the adoption of new payment or coverage policies can have some impact on our business.

International Regulation. Internationally, the regulation of medical devices is also complex. In Europe, our products are subject to extensive regulatory requirements. The regulatory regime in the European Union for medical devices became mandatory in June 1998. It requires that medical devices may only be placed on the market if they do not compromise safety and health when properly installed, maintained and used in accordance with their intended purpose. National laws conforming to the European Union’s legislation regulate our IOLs and eye care products under the medical devices regulatory system, rather than the more variable national requirements under which they were formerly regulated. The European Union medical device laws require manufacturers to declare that their products conform to the essential regulatory requirements after which the products may be placed on the market bearing the CE marking. The manufacturers’ quality systems for products in all but the lowest risk classification are also subject to certification and audit by an independent notified body. In Europe, particular emphasis is being placed on more sophisticated and faster procedures for the reporting of adverse events to the competent authorities.

In Japan, premarketing approval and clinical studies are required, as is governmental pricing approval for medical devices. Clinical studies are subject to a stringent “Good Clinical Practices” standard. Approval time frames from the Japanese Ministry, Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW) vary from simple notifications to review periods of one or more years, depending on the complexity and risk level of the device. In addition, importation into Japan of medical devices is subject to “Good Import Practices” regulations. As with any highly regulated market, significant changes in the regulatory environment could adversely affect future sales.

In many of the other foreign countries in which we market our products, we may be subject to regulations affecting, among other things:

•                  product standards;

•                  packaging requirements;

•                  labeling requirements;

•                  quality system requirements;

•                  import restrictions;

•                  tariff regulations;

•                  duties; and

•                  tax requirements.

Many of the regulations applicable to our devices and products in these countries are similar to those of the FDA. In many countries, the national health or social security organizations require our products to be qualified before they can be marketed with the benefit of reimbursement eligibility.

Fraud and Abuse. We are subject to various federal and state laws pertaining to health care fraud and abuse, including anti-kickback laws, physician self-referral laws, and false claims laws. Violations of these laws are punishable by criminal and/or civil sanctions, including, in some instances, imprisonment and exclusion from participation in federal and state health care programs, including Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Administration (VA) health programs and TRICARE. Although we believe that our operations are in material compliance with such laws, we can give no assurances as these laws are far-reaching and their

11

interpretation is subject to change. As a result, we could be required to alter one or more of our practices to remain in compliance with these laws. The occurrence of one or more violations of these laws could result in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Anti-Kickback Laws. Our operations are subject to federal and state anti-kickback laws. Provisions of the Social Security Act, commonly known as the “Anti-Kickback Law,” prohibit entities, such as our company, from knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting or receiving any form of remuneration in return for, or to induce:

•                  the referral of persons eligible for benefits under a federal health care program, including Medicare, Medicaid, the VA health programs and TRICARE, or a state health program; or

•                  the recommendation, purchase, lease or order of items or services that are covered, in whole or in part, by a federal health care program or state health programs.

The Anti-Kickback Law may be violated when even one purpose, as opposed to a primary or sole purpose, of a payment is to induce referrals or other business. Federal regulations create a small number of “safe harbors.” Practices which meet all the criteria of an applicable safe harbor will not be deemed to violate the statute; practices that do not satisfy all elements of a safe harbor do not necessarily violate the statute, although such practices may be subject to scrutiny by enforcement agencies.

Violation of the Anti-Kickback Law is a felony, punishable by substantial fines and (for individuals) imprisonment. In addition, the Department of Health and Human Services may impose civil penalties and exclude violators from participation in federal or state health care programs (including Medicare, Medicaid, VA health programs, and TRICARE); if a manufacturer is excluded, its products are not eligible for reimbursement by these programs. Many states have adopted similar anti-kickback laws, which vary in scope and may extend to payments intended to induce the recommendation, purchase, or order of products reimbursed by private payors as well as federal or state health care programs.

Employee Relations

At December 31, 2005, we employed approximately 3,440 persons throughout the world, including approximately 900 in the United States. None of our U.S.-based employees are represented by unions. We consider our relations with our employees to be, in general, very good.

Global Sales

Net sales in the United States were approximately $302.5 million, $186.9 million and $153.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Our international sales represented approximately $618.2 million,  $555.2 million and $448.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, or 67%, 75%, and 74% of total sales, respectively. Sales in Japan were approximately $174.3 million, $191.5 million and $164.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Our products are sold in over 60 countries. Sales are attributed to the country where the customer resides. Marketing activities are coordinated on a worldwide basis, and resident management teams provide leadership and infrastructure for introduction of new products in the local markets. For additional information relating to our geographic operating segments, see Note 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Raw Materials

We use a diverse and broad range of raw materials in the design, development and manufacture of our products. While we do fabricate or formulate some of our materials at our manufacturing facilities, we purchase most of the materials and components used in manufacturing our products from external suppliers. In addition, we purchase some supplies from single sources for reasons of quality assurance, sole source availability, cost effectiveness or constraints resulting from regulatory requirements. Several of our materials are sole sourced, including the source of hyaluronic acid used in manufacturing our Healon family of products. However, we work closely with our suppliers to assure continuity of supply while maintaining high quality and reliability. Where we buy a material from one source and other sources are available, alternative supplier options are generally considered and identified, although we do not typically pursue regulatory qualification of alternative sources due to the strength of our existing supplier relationships and the time and expense associated with the regulatory process. A change in suppliers could require significant effort or investment by us in circumstances where the items supplied are integral to the performance of our products or incorporate unique technology.

12

Environmental Matters

Our facilities and operations are subject to federal, state and local environmental and occupational health and safety requirements of the United States and foreign countries, including those relating to discharges of substances to the air, water and land, the handling, storage and disposal of wastes and the cleanup of properties affected by pollutants. We believe we are currently in material compliance with such requirements and do not currently anticipate any material adverse effect on our business or financial condition as a result of our efforts to comply with such requirements.

In the future, federal, state or local governments in the United States or foreign countries could enact new or more stringent laws or issue new or more stringent regulations concerning environmental and worker health and safety matters that could affect our operations. Also, in the future, contamination may be found to exist at our current or former facilities or off-site locations where we have sent wastes. We could be held liable for such newly-discovered contamination which could have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition. In addition, changes in environmental and worker health and safety requirements could have a material effect on our business or financial condition.

Competition

The markets for our ophthalmic surgical device and eye care products are intensely competitive and are subject to significant technological change. Companies within the ophthalmic surgical device market compete on technological leadership and innovation, quality and efficacy of products, relationships with eye care professionals and health care providers, breadth and depth of product offering and pricing. We believe we have the second largest ophthalmic surgical device business on a global basis behind Alcon, Inc., a subsidiary of Nestle S.A. Other competitors in the ophthalmic surgical device business include Bausch & Lomb, Staar Surgical, Moria, Nidek, IntraLase, Eyeonics, Hoya, Santen, and Corneal. We believe our competitive position is enhanced by our global distribution network, our focus on technology and customer relationships and product quality. Our ability to compete against larger companies may be impeded by having fewer resources to devote to research and development, sales and marketing.

Companies within the eye care market compete primarily on recommendations from eye care professionals, customer brand loyalty, product quality and pricing. We believe we have one of the top three largest contact lens care businesses on a global basis along with Alcon and Bausch & Lomb. Other competitors include CIBA Vision Corporation, a unit of Novartis; Moria, and in the contact lens business, CooperVision, Vistakon, a Johnson and Johnson company, and CIBA Vision Corporation. Our competitive position in the eye care business is enhanced by our strong presence outside the United States and our knowledge of these foreign markets, as well as technological advancement. Our larger competitors have more resources to devote to advertising and promotion, and this may negatively impact our competitive position.

Our competitors may develop technologies and products that are more effective or less costly than any of our current or future products or that could render our products obsolete or noncompetitive. Some of these competitors have substantially more resources and marketing capabilities than we do. Among other things, these consolidated companies can spread their research and development costs over much broader revenue bases than we can and can influence customer and distributor buying decisions. Our inability to produce and develop products that compete effectively against those of our competitors could result in a material reduction in sales.

Patents, Trademarks and Other Intellectual Property

Patents and other proprietary rights are important to the success of our business. We likewise utilize trade secrets, know-how, continuing technological innovations and licensing opportunities to develop and maintain our competitive position. We protect our proprietary rights through a variety of methods, including confidentiality agreements and proprietary information agreements with vendors, employees, consultants and others who have access to our proprietary information.

We have rights to over 1,400 granted and issued patents and approximately 970 pending patent applications relating to aspects of the technology incorporated in many of our products. The scope and duration of our proprietary protection varies throughout the world by jurisdiction and by individual product. In particular, patents for individual products extend for varying periods of time according to the date a patent application is filed, the date a patent is granted and the term of patent protection available in the jurisdiction granting the patent. Our proprietary protection often affords us the opportunity to enhance our position in the marketplace by precluding our competitors from using or otherwise exploiting our technology.

We believe trademark protection is particularly important to the maintenance of the recognized brand names under which we market our products. The scope and duration of our trademark protection varies throughout the world, with some countries protecting trademarks only as long as the mark is used, and others requiring registration of the mark and the payment of

13

registration fees. We own or have rights to material trademarks or trade names that we use in conjunction with the sale of our products, which include, among others, Advanced Medical Optics^®, Amadeus^™, AMO^®,  Array^®,  Baerveldt^®, blink^™, Blink-n-Clean^®, ClariFlex^®, Complete^®, Complete MoisturePLUS^™, Consept^®, Consept 1 Step^™, Custom Vue^®,  Healon^®, Healon5^®, Healon GV^®, Injector Ring^™, Ocupure^™, OptiEdge^™, Oxysept^®, Oxysept 1 Step^™, PhacoFlex^®, ReZoom^® , Sensar^®, Sovereign^®, Sovereign Compact^™, Stabileyes^®, Star S4 IR^™,Tecnis^®, The Unfolder^®, UltraCare^®, Ultrazyme^®, Verisyse^™, VISX^®, WaveScan^®, and WhiteStar^®. Generally, our products are marketed under one of these trademarks or brand names. Amadeus is a trademark of SIS Ltd.

We are also a party to several license agreements relating to various of our products; however, we do not believe the loss of any one license would materially affect our business.

We believe that our patents, trademarks and other proprietary rights are important to the development and conduct of our business and the marketing of our products. As a result, we aggressively protect our intellectual property. However, we do not believe that any one of our patents or trademarks is currently of material importance in relation to our overall sales.

Information Available on our Website

Our Internet address is www.amo-inc.com. We make available on our website, free of charge, our filings made with the SEC electronically, including those on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q, and Form 8-K, and any amendments to those filings. Copies are available as soon as reasonably practicable after we have filed or furnished these documents to the SEC. Our Code of Ethics, which applies to all employees, is available on our website. Our Code of Ethics is also available in print to any stockholder who requests it from our Investor Relations department, (714) 247-8348. Any changes to the Code of Ethics or waivers granted to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer or controller by our board of directors will be publicized on our website.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

You should carefully consider the following risks and other information. These risks and uncertainties are not the only ones we face. Others that we do not know about now, or that we do not now think are important, may also impair our business. The risks described in this section could cause our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated.

Risks Relating to Our Business

We may not successfully make or integrate acquisitions or enter into strategic alliances.

As part of our business strategy, we intend to pursue selected acquisitions and strategic alliances and partnerships. We compete with other ophthalmic surgical products and eye care companies, among others, for these opportunities and we cannot assure you that we will be able to effect strategic alliances, partnerships or acquisitions on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Even if we do enter into these transactions, we may experience:

•                  delays in realizing the benefits we anticipate, or we may not realize the benefits we anticipate at all;

•                  difficulties in integrating any acquired companies and products into our existing business;

•                  attrition of key personnel from acquired businesses;

•                  costs or charges;

•                  difficulties or delays in obtaining regulatory approvals;

•                  higher costs of integration than we anticipated; or

•                  unforeseen operating difficulties that require significant financial and managerial resources that would otherwise be available for the ongoing development or expansion of our existing operations.

Consummating these transactions could also result in the incurrence of additional debt and related interest expense, as well as unforeseen contingent liabilities, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may also issue additional equity in connection with these transactions, which would dilute our existing stockholders.

14

We conduct a significant amount of our sales and operations outside of the United States, which subjects us to additional business risks that may cause our profitability to decline.

Because we manufacture and sell a significant portion of our products in a number of foreign countries, our business is subject to risks associated with doing business internationally. In particular, our products are sold in over 60 countries, and our manufacturing facilities are located outside the continental United States, in Añasco, Puerto Rico; Madrid, Spain; and Hangzhou, China. In connection with the acquisition of Pfizer’s ophthalmic surgical business, we acquired Pfizer’s ophthalmic surgical products and certain manufacturing and research and development facilities located in Uppsala, Sweden and Groningen, Netherlands. In 2005, on an historical basis, we derived approximately $618.2 million, or 67%, of our net sales, from sales of our products outside of the United States, including 19% of our net sales in Japan. We intend to continue to pursue growth opportunities in sales internationally, which could expose us to greater risks associated with international sales and operations. Our international operations are, and will continue to be, subject to a number of risks and potential costs, including:

•                  unexpected changes in foreign regulatory requirements;

•                  differing local product preferences and product requirements;

•                  fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates;

•                  political and economic instability;

•                  changes in foreign medical reimbursement and coverage policies and programs;

•                  diminished protection of intellectual property in some countries outside of the United States;

•                  trade protection measures and import or export licensing requirements;

•                  difficulty in staffing and managing foreign operations;

•                  differing labor regulations; and

•                  potentially negative consequences from changes in tax laws.

Any of these factors may, individually or as a group, have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. In addition, we are particularly susceptible to the occurrence of any of these risks in Japan, due to our high concentration of sales in Japan.

As we expand our existing international operations, we may encounter new risks. For example, as we focus on building our international sales and distribution networks in new geographic regions, we must continue to develop relationships with qualified local distributors and trading companies. If we are not successful in developing these relationships, we may not be able to grow sales in these geographic regions. These or other similar risks could adversely affect our revenue and profitability.

We are exposed to foreign currency risks from our international operations that could adversely affect our financial results.

A significant portion of our sales and operating costs are, and from time to time, a portion of our indebtedness may be, denominated in foreign currencies. We are therefore exposed to fluctuations in the exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the currencies in which our foreign operations receive revenues and pay expenses, including debt service. Our consolidated financial results are denominated in U.S. dollars and therefore, during times of a strengthening U.S. dollar, our reported international sales and earnings will be reduced because the local currency will translate into fewer U.S. dollars. In addition, the assets and liabilities of our non-U.S. subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars at the weighted average exchange rate for the period. Translation adjustments arising from the use of differing exchange rates from period to period are included in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” in “Stockholders’ equity.” Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency fluctuations and remeasurements relating to foreign operations deemed to be operating in U.S. dollar functional currency are included in “Other, net” in our consolidated statements of operations. Accordingly, changes in currency exchange rates will cause our net earnings and stockholders’ equity to fluctuate.

15

If we do not introduce new commercially successful products in a timely manner, our products may become obsolete over time, customers may not buy our products and our revenue and profitability may decline.

Demand for our products may change in ways we may not anticipate because of:

•                  evolving customer needs;

•                  the introduction of new products and technologies;

•                  evolving surgical practices; and

•                  evolving industry standards.

Without the timely introduction of new commercially successful products and enhancements, our products may become obsolete over time, in which case our sales and operating results would suffer. The success of our new product offerings will depend on several factors, including our ability to:

•                  properly identify and anticipate customer needs;

•                  commercialize new products in a cost-effective and timely manner;

•                  manufacture and deliver products in sufficient volumes on time;

•                  obtain regulatory approval for such new products;

•                  differentiate our offerings from competitors’ offerings;

•                  achieve positive clinical outcomes;

•                  satisfy the increased demands by health care payors, providers and patients for lower-cost procedures;

•                  innovate and develop new materials, product designs and surgical techniques; and

•                  provide adequate medical and/or consumer education relating to new products and attract key surgeons to advocate these new products.

Moreover, innovations generally will require a substantial investment in research and development before we can determine the commercial viability of these innovations and we may not have the financial resources necessary to fund these innovations. In addition, even if we are able to successfully develop enhancements or new generations of our products, these enhancements or new generations of products may not produce revenue in excess of the costs of development and they may be quickly rendered obsolete by changing customer preferences or the introduction by our competitors of products embodying new technologies or features.

We are implementing a product rationalization and repositioning plan, which will require significant financial and personnel resources and may not be successful.

On October 31, 2005, our Board of Directors approved a product rationalization and repositioning plan covering the discontinuation of non-strategic cataract surgical and eye care products and the elimination or redeployment of resources that support these product lines. The plan includes organizational changes and potential reductions in force in manufacturing, sales and marketing associated with these product lines, as well as organizational changes in research and development and other corporate functions designed to align the organization with our strategy and strategic business unit organization. The plan further calls for increasing our investment in key growth opportunities, specifically our refractive implant product line and international laser vision correction business, and accelerating the implementation of productivity initiatives.

We expect that implementation of the product rationalization and repositioning plan will result in significant pre-tax charges, a substantial portion of which are expected to be cash expenditures. In addition, because we are in the preliminary stages of effectuating the plan and are subject to laws and regulations of several foreign jurisdictions that will require consultations and negotiations with works councils, labor organizations and local authorities the effects of which we can not yet fully evaluate, the final costs of the plan may vary significantly from our initial estimates. Implementation of the plan also will require substantial

16

personnel resources and may result in diversion of management’s attention away from other business activities that could be beneficial to our operations. We may not be able to successfully execute the plan as, and in the time frame, anticipated. In addition, lost sales of discontinued products may not be sufficiently offset by sales from promoted or new products, which could decrease our revenues, margins, profits and cash flows.

We rely on certain suppliers and manufacturers for raw materials and other products and are vulnerable to fluctuations in the availability and price of such products and services.

We purchase certain raw materials and other products from third-party suppliers and vendors, sometimes from limited sources. Our suppliers and vendors may not provide the raw materials or other products needed by us in the quantities requested, in a timely manner, or at a price we are willing to pay. In the event any of our third-party suppliers or vendors were to become unable or unwilling to continue to provide important raw materials and third-party products in the required volumes and quality levels or in a timely manner, we would be required to identify and obtain acceptable replacement supply sources. We may not be able to obtain alternative suppliers and vendors on a timely basis, or at all, which could result in lost sales because of our inability to manufacture products containing such raw materials or deliver products we sell from certain suppliers. In addition, we also rely on certain manufacturers for some of our products. We have historically outsourced the manufacture of our phacoemulsification equipment to third parties. If we were unable to renew our third-party manufacturing agreements, or if the manufacturers were to cease manufacturing any of these products for us for any reason, we may not be able to find alternative manufacturers on terms favorable to us, in a timely manner, or at all. If any of these events should occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

We face intense competition, and our failure to compete effectively could have a material adverse effect on our profitability and results of operations.

We face intense competition in the markets for our ophthalmic surgical and eye care products and these markets are subject to rapid and significant technological change. We have numerous competitors in the United States and abroad, including, among others, large companies such as Alcon, Inc., a publicly traded subsidiary of Nestle S.A.; Bausch & Lomb; CIBA Vision Corporation, a unit of Novartis; Moria; Intralase; Eyeonics; Hoya, Santen, Corneal, CooperVision; and Vistakon, a Johnson and Johnson company. Many of our competitors have substantially more resources and a greater marketing scale than we do. We may not be able to sustain our current levels of profitability and growth as competitive pressures, including pricing pressure from competitors, increase. In addition, if we are unable to develop and produce or market our products to effectively compete against our competitors, our operating results will materially suffer. We also compete against a large number of providers of alternative vision correction solutions, some of which may have greater financial resources than us. New or different methods of vision correction are continually being introduced. Any of these competitive pressures could result in decreased demand for our products.

Because of our leading market position in the laser vision correction business, all of our competitors target our market share in order to grow their own revenues. We can give no assurance that we will be able to maintain or grow our existing market share and it may, in fact, be required to incur considerable expenditures in order to maintain or increase that market share. Should our procedure market share decline, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, and results of operations.

Trends in the contact lens care market may negatively impact our eye care business.

Our eye care business is impacted by trends in the contact lens care market such as more simplified disinfection systems and technological and medical advances in surgical techniques for the correction of vision impairment. Less expensive one-bottle chemical disinfection systems have gained popularity among soft contact lens wearers instead of peroxide-based lens care products. Also, the growing use and acceptance of daily and extended wear contact lenses and laser correction procedures, along with the other factors above, could have the effect of continuing to reduce demand for lens care products generally. Our marketing and sales plans may not be appropriate or sufficient to mitigate the effect of these trends on our eye care business and, as a result, our eye care business may suffer.

If we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights, our business and prospects may be harmed.

Our ability to compete effectively is dependent upon our ability to protect and preserve the proprietary aspects of the designs, processes, technologies and materials owned by, used by or licensed to us. We have numerous U.S. patents and corresponding foreign patents that are expected to expire by their own terms at various dates and have additional patent applications pending that may not result in issued patents. Our failure to secure these patents may limit our ability to protect the intellectual property rights that these applications were intended to cover. Although we have attempted to protect our proprietary property, technologies and processes both in the United States and in foreign countries through a combination of patent law, trade

17

secrets and non-disclosure agreements, these may be insufficient. Competitors may be able to design around our patents to compete effectively with our products. We also may not be able to prevent third parties from using our technology without our authorization, breaching any non-disclosure agreements with us, or independently developing technology that is similar to ours. The use of our technology or similar technology by others could reduce or eliminate any competitive advantage we have developed, cause us to lose sales or otherwise harm our business. If it became necessary for us to resort to litigation to protect these rights, any proceedings could be costly and we may not prevail. Further, we may not be able to obtain patents or other protections on our future innovations. In addition, because of the differences in foreign patent and other laws concerning proprietary rights, our products may not receive the same degree of protection in foreign countries as they would in the United States. We cannot assure you that:

•                  pending patent applications will result in issued patents;

•                  patents issued to or licensed by us will not be challenged by third parties; or

•                  our patents will be found to be valid or sufficiently broad to protect our technology or provide us with a competitive advantage.

We may be subject to intellectual property litigation and infringement claims, which could cause us to incur significant expenses or prevent us from selling our products.

There is a substantial amount of litigation over patent and other intellectual property rights in the eye care industry and in the ophthalmic surgical products and contact lens care markets particularly. The fact that we have patents issued to us for our products does not mean that we will always be able to successfully defend our patents and proprietary rights against challenges or claims of infringement by our competitors. A successful claim of patent or other intellectual property infringement or misappropriation against us could adversely affect our growth and profitability, in some cases materially. We cannot assure you that our products do not and will not infringe issued patents or other intellectual property rights of third parties. From time to time, in the ordinary course of business, we receive notices from third parties alleging infringement or misappropriation of the patent, trademark and other intellectual property rights of third parties by us or our consumers in connection with the use of our products. We may be unaware of intellectual property rights of others that may cover some of our technology. If someone claims that our products infringe their intellectual property rights, whether or not such claims are meritorious, any resulting litigation could be costly and time consuming and would divert the attention of our management and personnel from other business issues. The complexity of the technology involved and the uncertainty of intellectual property litigation increase these risks. Claims of intellectual property infringement also might require us to enter into costly royalty or license agreements (if available on acceptable terms or at all). We also may be subject to significant damages or an injunction preventing us from manufacturing, selling or using some or some aspect of our products. We may also need to redesign some of our products or processes to avoid future infringement liability. Any of these adverse consequences could have a material adverse effect on our business and profitability.

Our manufacturing capacity may not be adequate to meet the demands of our business.

If our sales increase substantially, we may need to increase our production capacity. Any prolonged disruption in the operation of our manufacturing facilities or those of our third-party manufacturers could materially harm our business. We cannot assure you that if we choose to scale-up our manufacturing operations, we will be able to obtain regulatory approvals in a timely fashion, which could affect our ability to meet product demand or result in additional costs.

We could experience losses due to product liability claims, product recalls or corrections.

We have in the past been, and continue to be, subject to product liability claims. In connection with our spin-off from Allergan, we assumed the defense of any litigation involving claims related to our business and agreed to indemnify Allergan for all related losses, costs and expenses. As part of our risk management policy, we have obtained third-party product liability insurance coverage. Product liability claims against us may exceed the coverage limits of our insurance policies or cause us to record a self-insured loss. A product liability claim in excess of applicable insurance could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Even if any product liability loss is covered by an insurance policy, these policies have substantial retentions or deductibles that provide that we will not receive insurance proceeds until the losses incurred exceed the amount of those retentions or deductibles. To the extent that any losses are below these retentions or deductibles, we will be responsible for paying these losses. The payment of retentions or deductibles for a significant amount of claims could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

18

In addition, we are subject to medical device reporting regulations that require us to report to the FDA or similar governmental authorities in other countries if our products cause or contribute to a death or serious injury or malfunction in a way that would be reasonably likely to contribute to death or serious injury if the malfunction were to recur. The FDA and similar governmental authorities in other countries have the authority to require the recall of our products in the event of material deficiencies or defects in design or manufacturing. A government mandated or voluntary recall by us could occur as a result of manufacturing errors or design defects, including defects in labeling. We have undertaken voluntary recalls of our products in the past.

Any product liability claim or recall would divert managerial and financial resources and could harm our reputation with customers. We cannot assure you that we will not have product liability claims or recalls in the future or that such claims or recalls would not have a material adverse effect on our business.

If we fail to maintain our relationships with health care providers, customers may not buy our products and our revenue and profitability may decline.

We market our products to numerous health care providers, including eye care professionals, hospitals, ambulatory surgical centers, corporate optometry chains and group purchasing organizations. We have developed and strive to maintain close relationships with members of each of these groups who assist in product research and development and advise us on how to satisfy the full range of surgeon and patient needs. We rely on these groups to recommend our products to their patients and to other members of their organizations. The failure of our existing products and any new products we may introduce to retain the support of these various groups could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We generally do not have long-term contracts with our customers.

We generally do not enter into long-term contracts with our customers. As a result, we are exposed to volatility in the market for our products and loss of our customers. As a result, we may not be able to maintain our level of profitability. If we are unable to market our products on terms we find acceptable, our financial condition and results of operations could suffer materially.

Our business is subject to extensive government regulation.

Our products and operations are subject to extensive regulation in the United States by the FDA and various other federal and state regulatory agencies, including with respect to regulatory clearance or approval of our products, clinical and pre-clinical testing, product marketing, sales and distributions, adverse event reporting, prohibitions on fraud and abuse, submission of false claims, kickbacks and rebates, and relationships with physicians and other referral sources. Additionally, in many foreign countries in which we market our products, we are subject to similar regulations.

Before a new medical device or new use of, or claim for, or modification to an existing product can be marketed in the United States, a company must first apply for and receive either 510(k) clearance, premarket approval or a premarket approval supplement from the FDA, unless an exemption applies. Either process can be expensive, lengthy and unpredictable. Also, the identification or increased frequency of safety or efficacy concerns could result in product recall or withdrawal or revocation of our FDA clearance or premarket approval. Compliance with these regulations is expensive and time-consuming. We, our subcontractors, and third party manufacturers are subject to periodic and unannounced inspections by FDA and governmental authorities to assess compliance. If we fail to comply, the FDA and state or other regulatory agencies have broad enforcement powers, including any of the following sanctions:

•                  warning letters, fines, injunctions, consent decrees, civil penalties and exclusion from participation in federal and state health care programs;

•                  repair, replacement, recall or seizure of our products;

•                  operating restrictions, partial suspension or total shutdown of production;

•                  refusing our requests for 510(k) clearance or premarket approval of new products, new intended uses or modifications to existing products;

•                  withdrawing 510(k) clearance or premarket approvals that have already been granted; and

•                  criminal prosecution and penalties.

19

Product sales, introductions or modifications may be delayed or canceled as a result of U.S. or foreign regulatory processes, which could cause our sales to decline. Failure to obtain regulatory clearance or approvals of new products or product modifications we develop, any limitations imposed by regulatory agencies on new product uses or the costs of obtaining regulatory clearance or approvals could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We, our subcontractors, and third-party manufacturers are also subject to similar state requirements and licenses. We, our subcontractors, and third-party manufacturers must comply with extensive recordkeeping and reporting requirements and must make available our manufacturing facilities and records for unannounced and periodic inspections by governmental agencies, including FDA, state authorities and comparable agencies in other countries.

Health care initiatives and other cost-containment pressures could cause us to sell our products at lower prices, resulting in less revenue to us. In the United States, a significant percentage of the patients who receive our intraocular lenses are covered by the federal Medicare program. Changes in coverage or coding policies or reductions in Medicare reimbursement rates and the implementation of other price controls could adversely affect our revenues and financial condition. In addition, changes in existing regulatory requirements or adoption of new requirements could hurt our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The clinical trial process required to obtain regulatory approvals is costly and uncertain, and could result in delays in new product introductions or even an inability to release a product.

The clinical trials required to obtain regulatory approvals for our products are complex and expensive and their outcomes are uncertain. We incur substantial expense for, and devote significant time to, clinical trials but cannot be certain that the trials will ever result in the commercial sale of a product. We may suffer significant setbacks in clinical trials, even after earlier clinical trials showed promising results. Any of our products may produce undesirable side effects that could cause us or regulatory authorities to interrupt, delay or halt clinical trials of a product candidate. We, the FDA, or another regulatory authority may suspend or terminate clinical trials at any time if they or we believe the trial participants face unacceptable health risks.

Our business is subject to environmental regulations.

Our facilities and operations are subject to federal, state and local environmental and occupational health and safety requirements of the United States and foreign countries, including those relating to discharges of substances to the air, water and land, the handling, storage and disposal of wastes and the cleanup of properties affected by pollutants. Failure to maintain compliance with these regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition. The facilities we obtained in connection with the acquisition of Pfizer’s ophthalmic surgical business and in connection with our acquisition of VISX, Incorporated are also subject to such requirements and risks.

In the future, federal, state or local governments in the United States or foreign countries could enact new or more stringent laws or issue new or more stringent regulations concerning environmental and worker health and safety matters that could affect our operations. Also, in the future, contamination may be found to exist at our current or former facilities or off-site locations where we have sent wastes. We could be held liable for such newly discovered contamination which could have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition. In addition, changes in environmental and worker health and safety requirements could have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition.

If we fail to attract, hire and retain qualified personnel, we may not be able to design, develop, market or sell our products or successfully manage our business.

Our ability to attract new customers, retain existing customers and pursue our strategic objectives depends on the continued services of our current management, sales, product development and technical personnel and our ability to identify, attract, train and retain similar personnel. Competition for top management personnel is intense and we may not be able to recruit and retain the personnel we need. The loss of any one of our management personnel, or our inability to identify, attract, retain and integrate additional qualified management personnel, could make it difficult for us to manage our business successfully and pursue our strategic objectives. Similarly, competition for skilled sales, product development and technical personnel is intense and we may not be able to recruit and retain the personnel we need. The loss of services of a number of key sales, product development and technical personnel, or our inability to hire new personnel with the requisite skills, could restrict our ability to develop new products or enhance existing products in a timely manner, sell products to our customers or manage our business effectively.

20

We may not be able to hire or retain qualified personnel if we are unable to offer competitive salaries and benefits. If our stock does not perform well, we may have to increase our salaries and benefits, which would increase our expenses and reduce our profitability.

We may be required to satisfy certain indemnification obligations to Allergan, and we may not be able to collect on indemnification rights from Allergan.

Under the terms of our contribution and distribution agreement with Allergan, we and Allergan have each agreed to indemnify each other from and after our spin-off with respect to the debt, liabilities and obligations retained by our respective companies. These indemnification obligations could be significant. The ability to satisfy these indemnities, if called upon to do so, will depend upon the future financial strength of each of our respective companies. We cannot determine whether we will have to indemnify Allergan for any substantial obligations, and we may not have control over the settlement of certain claims and lawsuits that may require partial indemnification by us. We also cannot assure you that, if Allergan is required to indemnify us for any substantial obligations, Allergan will have the ability to satisfy those obligations.

We may be responsible for federal income tax liabilities that relate to the distribution of our common stock by Allergan.

Allergan has received a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service to the effect that the spin-off qualified as a tax-free transaction. If either us or Allergan breach representations to each other or to the Internal Revenue Service, or if we or Allergan take or fail to take, as the case may be, actions that result in the spin-off failing to meet the requirements of a tax-free spin-off pursuant to Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code, the party in breach will indemnify the other party for any and all resulting taxes. If we were required to pay any of the potential taxes described above, the payment would have a material adverse effect on our financial position.

Recent changes in the accounting treatment of stock options are expected to have a negative impact on our financial statements and could cause our stock price to decline.

On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Statement No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, or FAS 123(R), which includes proposed rule changes requiring companies to expense the fair value of employee stock options and other forms of stock-based compensation. Before 2006, we included the fair value of employee stock options on a pro forma basis in the notes to our annual financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, but did not record a charge for employee stock option expense in the reported financial statements. We are required to comply with FAS 123(R) as of January 1, 2006 and, as a result, our reported earnings are expected to decrease. Such a decrease may lead to a decline in our stock price.

If laser vision correction is not broadly accepted by both doctors and patients, our business, financial position and results of operations would be materially and adversely impacted.

Our business depends upon broad market acceptance of laser vision correction by both doctors and patients in the United States and key international markets. Our profitability and growth will be largely dependent on increasing levels of market acceptance and procedure growth, especially with regard to our higher-priced CustomVue™ procedure. Potential complications and side effects of laser vision correction include: post-operative discomfort, corneal haze (an increase in the light scattering properties of the cornea) during healing, glare/halos (undesirable visual sensations produced by bright lights), decreases in contrast sensitivity, temporary increases in intraocular pressure in reaction to procedure medication, modest fluctuations in refractive capabilities during healing, modest decrease in best corrected vision (i.e., with corrective eyewear), unintended over- or under-corrections, regression of effect, disorders of corneal healing, corneal scars, corneal ulcers, and induced astigmatism (which may result in blurred or double vision and/or shadow images). Some consumers may choose not to undergo laser vision correction because of these complications or more general concerns relating to its safety and efficacy or a resistance to surgery in general. Alternatively, some consumers may elect to delay undergoing laser vision correction surgery because they believe improved technology or methods of treatment will be available in the near future. Should either the ophthalmic community or the general population turn away from laser vision correction as an alternative to existing methods of treating refractive vision disorders, or if future technologies replaced laser vision correction, these developments could delay or prevent market acceptance of laser vision correction, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations.

The possibility of long-term side effects and adverse publicity regarding laser correction surgery could seriously harm our business.

Laser vision correction is a relatively new procedure. Consequently, there is no long-term follow-up data beyond ten years that might reveal additional complications or unknown side effects. Any future reported side effects, other adverse events or

21

unfavorable publicity involving patient outcomes resulting from the use of laser vision correction systems manufactured by us or any participant in the laser vision correction market, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, and results of operations.

General economic conditions could have a negative impact on our business, financial position, and results of operations.

Because laser vision correction is not subject to reimbursement from third-party payors such as insurance companies or government programs, the cost of laser vision correction is typically borne by individuals directly. Accordingly, weak or uncertain economic conditions may cause individuals to be less willing to incur the procedure cost associated with laser vision correction as was evidenced by VISX’s decline in revenues from 2002 compared to 2001 and from 2001 compared to 2000. A decline in economic conditions, especially in the United States, could result in a decline in the number of laser vision correction procedures performed and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, and results of operations.

While we devote significant resources to research and development, our research and development may not lead to new products that achieve commercial success.

Our research and development process is expensive, prolonged, and entails considerable uncertainty. Because of the complexities and uncertainties associated with ophthalmic research and development, products we are currently developing may not complete the development process or obtain the regulatory approvals required to market such products successfully. The products currently in our development pipeline may not be approved by regulatory entities and may not be commercially successful, and our current and planned products could be surpassed by more effective or advanced products.

Any failure by third party financing entities to satisfy their obligations to us would negatively impact our financial condition.

We have relationships with third party financing entities that purchase our products directly and subsequently lease and/or sell these products to end-user customers, or provide financing directly to customers who purchase products directly from us. Should any third party financing entity or entities fail or refuse to pay us in a timely manner or at all, it could negatively affect our cash flows and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations.

If any of our employees, consultants or others breach their proprietary information agreements, our competitive position could be harmed.

We protect our proprietary technology, in part, through proprietary information and inventions agreements with employees, consultants and other parties. These agreements with employees and consultants generally contain standard provisions requiring those individuals to assign to us, without additional consideration, inventions conceived or reduced to practice by them while employed or retained by us, subject to customary exceptions. If any of our employees, consultants or others breach these agreements our competitors may learn of our trade secrets.

Risks Relating to Our Indebtedness and Our Common Stock

We have a significant amount of debt. Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to meet our payment obligations under our debt.

We have a significant amount of debt and substantial debt service requirements. As of December 31, 2005, we had approximately $560 million of outstanding debt. Approximately $18.7 million of our revolving credit facility was reserved to support letters of credit issued on our behalf and approximately $231.3 million, exclusive of letters of credit, was available for future borrowings.

This level of debt could have significant consequences on our future operations, including:

•                                          making it more difficult for us to meet our payment and other obligations under our outstanding debt;

•                                          resulting in an event of default if we fail to comply with the financial and other restrictive covenants contained in our debt agreements, which event of default could result in all of our debt becoming immediately due and payable;

•                                          reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes, and limiting our ability to obtain additional financing for these purposes;

22

•                                          subjecting us to the risk of increased sensitivity to interest rate increases on our indebtedness with variable interest rates, including borrowings under our senior credit facility;

•                                          limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, and increasing our vulnerability to, changes in our business, the industry in which we operate and the general economy; and

•                                          placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt or are less leveraged.

Any of the above-listed factors could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to meet our payment obligations under the notes and our other debt.

To service our indebtedness, we will require a significant amount of cash. Our ability to generate cash flow depends on many factors beyond our control.

Our ability to meet our payment and other obligations under our debt depends on our ability to generate significant cash flow in the future. This, to some extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative and regulatory factors as well as other factors that are beyond our control. We cannot assure holders that our business will generate cash flow from operations, or that future borrowings will be available to us under our senior credit facility or otherwise, in an amount sufficient to enable us to meet our payment obligations under our debt and to fund other liquidity needs. We made an irrevocable election to satisfy in cash our conversion obligation with respect to the principal amount of any of our 2.50% convertible senior subordinated notes due 2024 (the “Existing 2.50% Convertible Notes”) converted after December 15, 2004, with any remaining amount of the conversion obligation to be satisfied in shares of our common stock, in each case, calculated as set forth in the indenture governing the Existing 2.50% Convertible Notes. In addition, because we made this election, the indenture provides that we must satisfy in cash our obligations to repurchase any Existing 2.50% Convertible Notes that holders put to us on January 15, 2010, July 15, 2014 and July 15, 2019.

If the Existing 2.50% Convertible Notes become convertible pursuant to their terms and the holders elect to convert or if holders elect to put their notes to us on the specified repurchase dates, we may not have sufficient cash to satisfy our obligations. In addition, our 1.375% convertible senior subordinated notes due 2025 contain similar provisions, we may be unable to repurchase the notes for cash when required by the holders, including following a fundamental change, or to pay the portion of the conversion value upon conversion of any notes by the holders. Our repurchase of any such notes may be prohibited by our other debt instruments, which could cause defaults and cross-defaults under our other debt agreements. If we are not able to generate sufficient cash flow to service our debt obligations, we may need to refinance or restructure our, sell assets, reduce or delay capital investments, or seek to raise additional capital. If we are unable to implement one or more of these alternatives, we may not be able to meet our payment obligations under the notes and our other debt.

A significant amount of our debt agreements contain covenant restrictions that may limit our ability to operate our business.

The agreements governing our senior credit facility contain covenant restrictions that limit our ability to operate our business, including restrictions on our ability to:

•                                          incur additional debt or issue guarantees;

•                                          create liens;

•                                          make certain investments;

•                                          enter into transactions with our affiliates;

•                                          sell certain assets;

•                                          redeem capital stock or make other restricted payments;

•                                          declare or pay dividends or make other distributions to stockholders; and

•                                          consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of our assets and the assets of our subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

23

Our senior credit facility requires us to maintain specific leverage, fixed charge coverage and interest coverage ratios. Our ability to comply with these covenants is dependent on our future performance, which will be subject to many factors, some of which are beyond our control, including prevailing economic conditions. Our failure to comply with these obligations would prevent us from borrowing additional money under the facility and could result in a default under it. If a default occurs under any of our senior indebtedness, the relevant lenders could elect to declare the indebtedness, together with accrued interest and other fees, to be immediately due and payable and proceed against substantially all of our assets, which will serve as collateral securing the indebtedness. Moreover, if the lenders under a facility or other agreement in default were to accelerate the indebtedness outstanding under that facility, it could result in a default under other indebtedness. If all or any part of our indebtedness were to be accelerated, we may not have or be able to obtain sufficient funds to repay it. In addition, we may incur other indebtedness in the future that may contain financial or other covenants that are more restrictive than those contained in our current indentures.

As a result of these covenants, our ability to respond to changes in business and economic conditions and to obtain additional financing, if needed, may be significantly restricted, and we may be prevented from engaging in transactions that might otherwise be beneficial to us. In addition, our failure to comply with these covenants could result in a default under our debt, which could permit the holders to accelerate such debt. If any of our debt is accelerated, we may not have sufficient funds available to repay such debt.

Despite our and our subsidiaries’ current levels of indebtedness, we may incur substantially more debt, which could further exacerbate the risks associated with our substantial indebtedness.

Although certain of our debt agreements contain restrictions on the incurrence of additional indebtedness, these restrictions are subject to a number of qualifications and exceptions, and the indebtedness incurred in compliance with these restrictions could be substantial. Also, these restrictions do not prevent us from incurring obligations that do not constitute “indebtedness” as defined in the relevant agreement. If new debt is added to our current debt levels, the related risks that we now face could intensify.

Our stock price may fluctuate as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include:

•                                          quarterly variations in our operating results;

•                                          operating results that vary from the expectations of management, securities analysts and investors;

•                                          changes in expectations as to our future financial performance;

•                                          announcements of innovations, new products, strategic developments, significant contracts, acquisitions and other material events by us or our competitors;

•                                          the operating and securities price performance of other companies that investors believe are comparable to us;

•                                          future sales of our equity or equity-related securities;

•                                          changes in general conditions in our industry and in the economy, the financial markets and the domestic or international political situation;

•                                          developments or disputes (including lawsuits) concerning proprietary rights;

•                                          departures of key personnel; and

•                                          regulatory considerations.

In addition, in recent years, the stock market in general has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant effect on the market price of securities issued by many companies for reasons often unrelated to their operating performance. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect our stock price, regardless of our operating results.

24

Our stockholder rights plan, amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as well as provisions of Delaware law, could make it difficult for a third party to acquire our company.

We have a stockholder rights plan that may have the effect of discouraging unsolicited takeover proposals. The rights issued under the stockholder rights plan would cause substantial dilution to a person or group that attempts to acquire us on terms not approved in advance by our board of directors. In addition, Delaware corporate law and our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that could delay, deter or prevent a change in control of our company or our management. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for our stockholders to elect directors and take other corporate actions without the concurrence of our management or board of directors. These provisions:

•                                          authorize our board of directors to issue “blank check” preferred stock, which is preferred stock that can be created and issued by our board of directors, without stockholder approval, with rights senior to those of common stock;

•                                          provide for a staggered board of directors and three-year terms for directors, so that no more than one-third of our directors could be replaced at any annual meeting;

•                                          provide that directors may be removed only for cause;

•                                          provide that stockholder action may be taken only at a special or regular meeting and not by written consent;

•                                          provide for super-majority voting requirements for some provisions of our charter; and

•                                          establish advance notice requirements for submitting nominations for election to the board of directors and for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at a meeting.

We are also subject to anti-takeover provisions under Delaware law, which could also delay or prevent a change of control. Together, these provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws, Delaware law and our stockholder rights plan may discourage transactions that otherwise could provide for the payment of a premium over prevailing market prices of our common stock and, possibly, the notes, and also could limit the price that investors are willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock and the notes.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

We have no unresolved written comments from the Commission.

Item 2. Properties

Our principal executive offices and research facilities are located in Santa Ana, California, in a facility subleased by us through July 2015. We also have an administrative, research and development and manufacturing facility in Santa Clara, California, leased by us through May 2008. We conduct our global operations in facilities that we own or lease. Material facilities include administrative facilities in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Ireland, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom. We also have two facilities in Japan, one used for administration and research and development and the other used for warehousing. We lease all of these facilities. In addition, we operate five manufacturing facilities: one in Añasco, Puerto Rico, where we lease the land and the facility, one in Madrid, Spain, where we own the land and the facility, one in Hangzhou, China, where we own the facility but lease the land, one in Uppsala, Sweden, where we own the land and the facility, and one in Groningen, Netherlands, where we own the land and the facility. We believe these facilities are adequate for the current needs of our business.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

On December 3, 2003, we filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware against Alcon, Inc. and Alcon Laboratories, Inc. for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,700,240 (Barwick Patent) and 6,059,765 (Cole/Sutton Patent). We alleged that Alcon’s “Infiniti” and “Series 20000 Legacy” phacoemulsification machines infringe the patents. We sought damages and a permanent injunction. The trial of this matter began on April 25, 2005 and concluded on May 6, 2005. The jury found both of our patents to be valid and infringed by Alcon, and awarded us $94.8 million in damages. The jury further found that Alcon had willfully infringed both of our patents. On June 21, 2005, a bench trial was conducted by the Court to determine if we had sufficiently marked our equipment with the patent numbers and to determine if Alcon had waived any argument relating thereto.

25

On December 16, 2005, the Court ruled that we did not sufficiently mark our patents and reduced the jury award from $94.8 million to $71.3 million. However, the Court further ruled that Alcon had willfully infringed our patents and trebled the $71.3 million damage award to $213.9 million. The Court also granted our request for a permanent injunction on both patents. However, the Court stayed the injunction on the Cole/Sutton Patent pending appeal. On January 20, 2006, judgment was entered including additional damages from March 2005 through December 31, 2005 and interest based thereon, resulting in final damages of $234.5 million. The Court further ordered Alcon to pay all of the Company’s attorney fees and costs, estimated at $4 million. Alcon filed an appeal of the final judgment on January 20, 2006. We cross appealed on February 3, 2006. On February 3, 2006, Alcon filed a motion for a new trial with the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. We opposed this motion on February 24, 2006.

On January 28, 2004, Alcon Manufacturing, Ltd. filed a complaint against us and Allergan, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division, for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 4,832,685 and 4,935,005 (Haines Patents). Alcon alleged that our Prestige and Sovereign phacoemulsification systems and replacement cassettes infringe the patents. Alcon is seeking damages and a permanent injunction. At Alcon’s request, the case has been stayed in Texas while the parties seek re-examination by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on the Haines Patents in light of another patent we allege invalidates the Haines Patents.

On January 4, 2005, Dr. James Nielsen filed a complaint against us and Allergan, Inc. in the U.S. District Court of the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,158,572. Dr. Nielsen alleges that our Array multifocal intraocular lens infringes the patent. He is seeking damages and a permanent injunction. The trial in this matter is scheduled to begin on November 6, 2006.

On August 8, 2005, Alcon Manufacturing, Ltd and Alcon Laboratories, Inc. filed a complaint against us in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division, for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 4,921,477 (relating to a surgical irrigation and aspiration system with a dampening device); 5,199,943 (relating to an ultrasonic surgical handpiece); 5,188,589 (relating to a textured sleeve in a phacoemulsification handpiece); and 5,876,016 and 6,109,572 (both of which relate to an apparatus and method to elevate an infusion source in an ophthalmic surgical procedure). Alcon alleged that we infringe these patents in the course of selling our phacoemulsification systems or accessories, and is seeking damages and a permanent injunction. The trial in this matter is scheduled to begin on August 14, 2006.

On September 13, 2005, Alcon Manufacturing, Ltd. filed a complaint against us in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, for infringement of U.S Patent No. 5,273,056 relating to the use of a combination of viscoelastics during ophthalmic surgery. Alcon alleged that we infringed, contributorily infringed, and/or induced infringement of this patent, and is seeking damages and a permanent injunction.

We do not believe, based on current knowledge, that any of the foregoing legal proceedings or claims are likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, we may incur substantial expenses in defending against third party claims. In the event of a determination adverse to us or our subsidiaries, we may incur substantial monetary liability, and be required to change our business practices. Either of these could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

While we are involved from time to time in litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, including product liability claims, we are not currently aware of any other actions against us or Allergan relating to the optical medical device business that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. We may be subject to future litigation and infringement claims, which could cause us to incur significant expenses or prevent us from selling our products. We operate in an industry susceptible to significant product liability claims. Product liability claims may be asserted against us in the future arising out of events not known to us at the present time. Under the terms of the contribution and distribution agreement effecting our spin-off, Allergan agreed to assume responsibility for, and to indemnify us against, all current and future litigation relating to its retained businesses and we agreed to assume responsibility for, and to indemnify Allergan against, all current and future litigation related to the optical medical device business.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

We did not submit any matter during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report to a vote of security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.

26

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Dividends. We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock or any of our securities. We do not expect to pay cash dividends on our capital stock in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain our future earnings to continue to fund the development and growth of our business as well as repay long-term debt. In addition, our amended and restated senior credit facility prohibits us from paying cash dividends.

Market Information. The following table shows the quarterly price range of our common stock during the periods listed.

Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and is traded under the symbol “EYE.” The closing price of our common stock was $44.48 on February 28, 2006.

The approximate number of stockholders of record was 4,722 as of February 28, 2006.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities. During the quarter ended December 31, 2005, the Company issued an aggregate of 291,760 shares of common stock to a limited number of holders of the Company’s 3 ½% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes due 2023 (the “3 ½% convertible notes”) in exchange for approximately $5.4 million aggregate principal amount of the 3 ½% convertible notes in privately negotiated transactions. The issuance of the shares of common stock was made in reliance on Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer. The following sets forth the amount of the 3 ½% convertible notes acquired by AMO during the quarter ended December 31, 2005:

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

27

The following sets forth shares purchased from employees to pay taxes related to our equity incentive plan.

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following table sets forth selected financial data as of and for each of the years in the five-year period ended December 31, 2005, which has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. After December 31, 2001, goodwill is no longer amortized. Goodwill amortization was $9.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2001.

The selected financial data may not be indicative of the results of operations or financial position that we would have obtained if we had been an independent company during all pre-spin-off periods presented.

28

No earnings per share data is presented for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2002 as our earnings were a part of Allergan’s earnings through the close of business on June 28, 2002.

(a)          Includes results of the acquired Pfizer Inc. Surgical Ophthalmic Business since June 26, 2004 (date of acquisition).

(b)         Includes results of the acquired VISX business since May 27, 2005 (date of acquisition).

29

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis presents the factors that had a material effect on AMO’s results of operations and cash flows during each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005, and the Company’s financial position at that date. Except for the historical information contained herein, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risk and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in the section entitled “Risk Factors.” This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the historical consolidated financial statements of AMO and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

Overview

We are a global leader in the development, manufacture and marketing of medical devices for the eye. We have two major product lines: ophthalmic surgical and eye care. Our ophthalmic surgical product line provides medical devices for use in the cataract / implant and laser vision correction markets. In the cataract and implant market, we focus on the four key products required for cataract surgery – foldable intraocular lenses, or IOLs, implantation systems, phacoemulsification systems and viscoelastics. In the laser vision correction market, we market laser systems, diagnostic devices, treatment cards and microkeratomes for use in laser eye surgery. Our eye care product line provides a full range of contact lens care products for use with most types of contact lenses. These products include single-bottle, multi-purpose cleaning and disinfecting solutions, hydrogen peroxide-based disinfecting solutions, daily cleaners, enzymatic cleaners and contact lens rewetting drops. In addition, we sell contact lenses in Europe and Asia.

We have operations in approximately 20 countries and sell our products in approximately 60 countries and have organized our operations into four regions:

•                                          Americas (North and South America);

•                                          Europe, Africa and Middle East;

•                                          Japan; and

•                                          Asia Pacific (excluding Japan, but including Australia and New Zealand).

Product Rationalization and Repositioning Plan

On October 31, 2005, our Board of Directors approved a product rationalization and repositioning plan covering the discontinuation of non-strategic cataract surgical and eye care products and the elimination or redeployment of resources that support these product lines. The plan also includes organizational changes and potential reductions in force in manufacturing, sales and marketing associated with these product lines, as well as organizational changes in research and development and other corporate functions designed to align the organization with our strategy and strategic business unit organization. A substantial portion of expected operating cost benefits will result from reductions in force and associated annualized employee compensation of approximately $14.2 million.

The plan further calls for increasing our investment in key growth opportunities, specifically our refractive implant product line and international laser vision correction business, and accelerating the implementation of productivity initiatives.

In the fourth quarter of 2005, we incurred $42.3 million of pre-tax charges, which included $12.6 million for inventory related charges included in cost of sales and $29.7 million included in operating expenses for severance, relocation and other one-time termination benefits of $14.0 million, asset write-downs of $9.2 million, contractual obligations of $2.7 million and accelerated productivity and brand repositioning costs of $3.8 million. We expect to incur an additional $28 million to $38 million of charges in the first half of 2006, which will be recognized as the services are performed and actions occur. The total charges that are expected to be incurred are within the range previously announced.

Certain foreign jurisdictions have laws and regulations which require consultations and negotiations with works councils, labor organizations and local authorities. The outcome of these discussions will determine, in part, the restructuring steps to be implemented and the associated cost. Therefore, the final costs of the business repositioning plan may be significantly different from our initial estimates.

30

Acquisition of VISX, Incorporated

On May 27, 2005, pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger (Merger Agreement), dated as of November 9, 2004, as amended, by and among Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. (AMO), Vault Merger Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of AMO, and VISX, Incorporated (VISX), we completed our acquisition of VISX, for total consideration of approximately $1.38 billion, consisting of approximately 27.8 million shares of AMO common stock, the fair value of VISX stock options converted to AMO stock options and approximately $176.2 million in cash (VISX Acquisition). VISX products include the VISX STAR Excimer Laser System, the VISX WaveScan System and VISX treatment cards.

The VISX Acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase business combination. Under the purchase method of accounting, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at the date of acquisition at their respective fair values. Our reported financial position and results of operations after May 27, 2005 include VISX and the impact of purchase accounting. Purchase accounting applied to the VISX Acquisition resulted in a non-cash in-process research and development charge of $488.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2005.

Acquisition of Pfizer Inc. Surgical Ophthalmic Business

On June 26, 2004, we completed the acquisition of the Pfizer Inc. surgical ophthalmic business for $450 million in cash (Pfizer Acquisition). We acquired ophthalmic surgical products and certain manufacturing and research and development facilities located in Uppsala, Sweden, Groningen, Netherlands and Bangalore, India. The products acquired include the Healon line of viscoelastic products used in ocular surgery, the CeeOn and Tecnis intraocular lenses and the Baerveldt glaucoma shunt.

The Pfizer Acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase business combination. Our reported financial position and results of operations after June 26, 2004 include Pfizer and the impact of purchase accounting. Purchase accounting applied to the Pfizer Acquisition resulted in charges in the year ended December 31, 2004, including an in-process research and development charge of $28.1 million and incremental cost of sales of $28.1 million from the sale of acquired inventory adjusted to fair value. During 2004, we also incurred other acquisition-related charges totaling approximately $11.6 million as we integrated the Pfizer surgical ophthalmic business and eliminated duplicative functions.

Separation from Allergan

Allergan spun-off its existing optical medical device business by contributing all of the assets related to the two business lines that comprise the optical medical device business to us and distributing all of our outstanding shares of common stock to its stockholders. We had no material assets, liabilities or activities as a separate corporate entity until Allergan’s contribution to us of the optical medical device business. The contribution of assets and distribution to Allergan stockholders was completed on June 29, 2002. As a result of the spin-off, we are an independent public company and Allergan no longer maintains any stock ownership in us.

Prior to the spin-off, we entered into several agreements with Allergan in connection with, among other things, transitional services, employee matters, manufacturing and tax sharing.

Under the manufacturing agreement, which ended on June 29, 2005, Allergan manufactured certain of our eye care products and VITRAX viscoelastics from the date of the spin-off. We purchased these products from Allergan at a price equal to Allergan’s fully allocated costs plus 10%. During 2005, 2004 and 2003, we purchased $41.9 million, $89.3 million and $77.0 million, respectively, of product from Allergan. On an annual basis, a pricing “true up” calculation was performed during the first calendar quarter after the end of each year. This “true up” calculation was based on the actual volume of products shipped by Allergan to us during the preceding year versus the forecasted volume submitted by us that was used to calculate the invoiced prices. During the year, we periodically reviewed the volume of purchases and accrued for estimated shortfalls, if any. In October 2005, we received $0.8 million from Allergan for the final “true up” calculation for the last six months of the agreement. In March 2005, we made a payment of $0.2 million to Allergan based upon the “true up” calculation for the year ended December 31, 2004. In March 2004, we made a payment of $0.2 million to Allergan based upon the “true up” calculation for the year ended December 31, 2003. These payments have been recorded as an increase/decrease to cost of sales in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

The tax sharing agreement governs Allergan’s and our respective rights, responsibilities and obligations with respect to taxes for any tax period ending before, on or after the spin-off. Generally, Allergan is liable for all pre-spin-off taxes except for pre-spin-off taxes attributable to our business for 2002. In addition, the tax sharing agreement provides that Allergan is liable for taxes that are incurred as a result of restructuring activities undertaken to effectuate the spin-off. During 2005, we realized final adjustments to accrued, pre-spin-off taxes attributable to our business and payable to Allergan pursuant to this agreement. These

31

adjustments included a $1.4 million benefit from the resolution of a discrete item in the third quarter of 2005, which was recorded in the income tax provision.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Revenue Recognition and Accounts Receivable

Revenue is realized or realizable and earned when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. We record revenue from product sales when title and risk of ownership have been transferred to the customer, which is typically upon delivery to the customer, with the exception of intraocular lenses distributed on a consignment basis, which is upon notification of implantation in a patient. We recognize license fees and revenues from the sale of treatment cards to direct customers when we ship the treatment cards as we have no continuing obligations or involvement subsequent to shipment.

Some customers finance the purchase or rental of their VISX equipment directly from us over periods ranging from one to three years. These financing agreements are classified as either rental or operating leases or sales type leases as prescribed by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13, “Accounting for Leases.” Under sales type leases, system revenues are recognized based on the net present value of the expected cash flow after installation to direct customers in the United States and Japan or after shipment to international distributors. Under rental or operating lease arrangements, rental revenue is recognized over the term of the agreement.

We generally permit returns of product if such product is returned in a timely matter, in good condition, and through the normal channels of distribution. However, we do not accept returns of treatment cards and we do not provide rights of return or exchange, price protection or stock rotation rights to any of our VISX product distributors. Return policies in certain international markets can be more stringent and are based on the terms of contractual agreements with the customers. Allowances for returns are provided for based upon an analysis of our historical patterns of returns matched against the sales from which they originated. To date, historical product returns have been within our estimates.

When we recognize revenue from the sale of our products, certain allowances known and estimable at time of sale are recorded as a reduction to sales. These items include cash discounts, allowances and rebates. These items are reflected as a reduction to accounts receivable to the extent the customer will or is expected to reduce its payment on the related invoice amounts. In addition, certain items such as rebates provided to customers that meet certain buying targets are paid to the customer subsequent to customer payment. Thus, such amounts are recorded as accrued liabilities. These provisions are estimated based on historical payment experience, historical relationship to revenues and estimated customer inventory levels. If the historical data and inventory estimates used to calculate these provisions do not properly reflect future activity, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows could be impacted. To date, historical sales allowances have been within our estimates.

The allowance for doubtful accounts is determined by analyzing specific customer accounts and assessing the risk of uncollectibility based on insolvency, disputes or other collection issues. In addition, we routinely analyze the different aging categories and establish allowances based on the length of time receivables are past due.

Inventories

Inventories are valued at the lower of first-in, first-out cost or market. On a regular basis, we evaluate inventory balances for excess quantities and obsolescence by analyzing estimated demand, inventory on hand, sales levels and other information. Based on these evaluations, inventory balances are reduced, if necessary.

Goodwill and Long-Lived Assets

On January 1, 2002, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, whereby goodwill is no longer amortized, but instead is subject to a periodic impairment review performed during the second quarter of each fiscal year. In a business combination, goodwill is allocated to our various reporting units, which are the same as our reportable operating segments based on relative fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. As our operations comprise four reporting units (Americas, Europe/Africa/Middle East, Japan and Asia Pacific), we review the recoverability of goodwill by comparing each unit’s fair value to the net book value of its assets. If the book value of the reporting unit’s assets exceeds its fair value, the goodwill is written down to its implied fair value.

32

Additionally, we review the carrying amount of goodwill whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of goodwill may not be recoverable. Impairment indicators include, among other conditions, cash flow deficits, historic or anticipated declines in revenue or operating profit and adverse legal or regulatory developments. If it is determined such indicators are present and the review indicates goodwill will not be fully recoverable, based upon discounted estimated cash flows, the carrying value is reduced to implied fair value.

In the second quarters of 2005, 2004 and 2003, we performed the annual impairment tests of goodwill, and no impairment was indicated based on these tests.

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets”, we assess potential impairment to our long-lived assets when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. If required, an impairment loss is recognized as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the assets.

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method, whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. We evaluate the need to establish a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets based upon the amount of existing temporary differences, the period in which they are expected to be recovered and expected levels of taxable income. A valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets is established when it is “more likely than not” that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

We record a liability for potential tax assessments based on our estimate of the potential exposure. New laws and new interpretations of laws and rulings by tax authorities may affect the liability for potential tax assessments. Due to the subjectivity and complex nature of the underlying issues, actual payments or assessments may differ from estimates. To the extent our estimates differ from actual payments or assessments, income tax expense is adjusted. Our income tax returns in several locations are being examined by the local taxation authorities. Management believes that adequate amounts of tax and related interest, if any, have been provided for any adjustments that may result from these examinations.

Stock-Based Compensation

We measure stock-based compensation for option grants to employees and members of the board of directors using the intrinsic value method. The fair value of each option grant for determining the pro forma disclosure impact of stock-based compensation expense is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with weighted average assumptions. These assumptions consist of expected dividend yield, expected volatility, expected life, and risk-free interest rate. If the assumptions used to calculate the value of each option grant do not properly reflect future activity, the weighted average fair value of our grants could be impacted. Beginning in the first quarter of 2006, we will measure stock-based compensation using the fair value method under revised Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board in December 2004. See “New Accounting Standards” section for further discussion.

Under the 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan as approved in the special meeting of stockholders on May 26, 2005, we granted restricted stock to employees and members of the board of directors during the year ended December 31, 2005. Restricted stock awards are valued based on the market price of a share of non-restricted stock on the grant date and compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period of the restricted stock.

Acquired In-Process Research and Development

Costs to acquire in-process research and development (IPR&D) projects and technologies which have no alternative future use and which have not reached technological feasibility at the date of acquisition are expensed as incurred. The fair value of IPR&D projects and technologies is estimated based upon management’s assumptions such as projected regulatory approval dates, estimated future revenues and cost of goods sold of the products under development and expected sales and marketing costs. The major risks and uncertainties associated with the timely and successful completion of these projects consist of the ability to confirm the safety and efficacy of the technology based on the data from clinical trials and obtaining necessary regulatory approvals. In addition, no assurance can be given that the underlying assumptions used to forecast the cash flows or the timely and successful completion of such projects will materialize, as estimated. For these reasons, among others, actual results may vary from the estimated results.

33

Comparing Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003

Net sales. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, net sales by geographic region and major product line.

We organize our operations into four regions: the Americas, which includes North and South America, Europe/Africa/Middle East, Japan and Asia Pacific.

Net sales for 2005 increased by $178.6 million, or 24.1%, to $920.7 million in 2005 from $742.1 million in 2004. The increase in 2005 was primarily the result of sales of products acquired in the VISX Acquisition in 2005 and the full year impact of the purchase of the Pfizer ophthalmic surgical business in June 2004, as well as increased sales of technologically advanced products due to continued market acceptance of the products. Net sales of acquired VISX products approximated $111.1 million in 2005. Net sales of acquired Pfizer ophthalmic

34

surgical products were $168.4 million in 2005, compared to net sales of $75.8 million in 2004. These increases were partially offset by declines in our older non-promoted and discontinued products and eye care sales in Japan and Europe. The unfavorable impact from foreign currency fluctuations on net sales was $0.2 million in 2005. The favorable impact from foreign currency fluctuations during the first nine months of 2005 were offset by a negative impact in the fourth quarter of 2005. Our net sales and earnings in future periods may be negatively impacted during times of a strengthening U.S. dollar.

The U.S. information is presented separately as it is our headquarters country, and U.S. sales represented 32.9%, 25.2%, and 25.5% of total net sales in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Additionally, sales in Japan represented 18.9%, 25.8%, and 27.3% of total net sales in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. No other country, or any single customer, generated over 10% of total net sales in any of these years.

Net sales in the Americas, including the United States, increased $126.5 million, or 58.1%, in 2005 from 2004 and such increase comprised a $122.4 million increase in sales of ophthalmic surgical products and a $4.1 million increase in sales of eye care products. The increase in sales of ophthalmic surgical products was primarily the result of sales of products acquired in the VISX and Pfizer Acquisitions. Net sales of acquired VISX products were $94.9 million in 2005. Net sales of acquired Pfizer products, including the Healon family of viscoelastics and Tecnis intraocular lenses, were $49.7 million in 2005, compared to $21.0 million in 2004. The increase in sales of eye care products was primarily due to an increase in sales of Complete branded products. Net sales in the Americas include the favorable impact of foreign currency fluctuations of $2.3 million in 2005.

Net sales in Europe/Africa/Middle East increased $34.9 million, or 13.2%, in 2005 from 2004 and such increase comprised a $42.8 million increase in sales of ophthalmic surgical products and a $7.9 million decrease in sales of eye care products. Net sales of acquired VISX products were $6.9 million in 2005. The increase in sales of ophthalmic surgical products includes $68.7 million in sales of acquired Pfizer products, including the Healon family of viscoelastics and Tecnis intraocular lenses, compared to $31.1 million in 2004. The increase in sales of ophthalmic surgical products also reflected an increase in net sales of phacoemulsification products. The decrease in sales of eye care products was primarily due to a decrease in sales of hydrogen peroxide-based products due to the overall market decline as the migration of single-bottle cleaning regimens continues. Net sales in Europe/Africa/Middle East include the unfavorable impact of foreign currency fluctuations of $1.0 million primarily due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar versus the euro in 2005.

Net sales in Japan decreased $17.2 million, or 9.0%, in 2005 from 2004 and such decrease comprised a $32.0 million decrease in sales of eye care products, partially offset by a $14.8 million increase in sales of ophthalmic surgical products. The decrease in sales of eye care products was primarily due to decreases in sales of multipurpose solutions and hydrogen peroxide-based products resulting from the contracting market for these products in Japan. We are seeing continuing shrinkage of the market for hydrogen-peroxide based products as contact lens wearers gravitate increasingly to frequent replacement lenses that use more convenient multipurpose solutions. We also saw decreased sales of multipurpose products due to rapid growth of daily disposable lenses and our decision to discontinue our non-core products. The increase in sales of ophthalmic surgical products includes $32.9 million in sales of acquired Pfizer products in 2005, compared to $18.2 million in 2004. Net sales of acquired VISX products were $2.6 million in 2005. Net sales in Japan include the unfavorable impact of foreign currency fluctuations of $ 3.2 million resulting from the strengthening of the U.S. dollar versus the Japanese yen in 2005.

Net sales in Asia Pacific increased $34.4 million, or 49.7%, in 2005 from 2004 and such increase comprised a $26.4 million increase in sales of ophthalmic surgical products and a $8.0 million increase in sales of eye care products. The increase in sales of ophthalmic surgical products includes $17.1 million in sales of acquired Pfizer products in 2005, compared to $5.5 million in 2004. We also saw increased sales of other promoted products in 2005. Net sales of acquired VISX products were $6.7 million in 2005. The increase in sales of eye care products was primarily due to an increase in sales of Complete branded products. Net sales in Asia Pacific include the favorable impact of foreign currency fluctuations of $1.7 million in 2005.

Global sales of our ophthalmic surgical products increased $206.4 million, or 49.9%, in 2005 from 2004. Sales of our ophthalmic surgical products increased primarily due to sales of products acquired in the VISX Acquisition and increased sales of our branded promoted products, including the Healon family of viscoelastics, Tecnis and ReZoom intraocular lenses, and increased sales of Sensar intraocular lenses and phacoemulsification products. Ophthalmic surgical product sales were negatively impacted by decreased sales of non-promoted older-technology intraocular lenses and non-promoted viscoelastics. We believe that global sales of ophthalmic surgical products will continue to grow due to sales of acquired products, including the Healon family of viscoelastics, the Tecnis intraocular lens, the Baerveldt glaucoma shunt, the VISX STAR systems and treatment cards, and increased sales of our Sensar and ReZoom intraocular lenses. We expect the growth to be partially offset by decreased sales of our older intraocular lenses as we continue our strategy of promoting our higher-technology intraocular lenses, Tecnis, Sensar and ReZoom. Net sales of acquired VISX products were $111.1 million in 2005. Net sales of acquired Pfizer products were $168.4 million in 2005, compared to $75.8 million in 2004. The favorable impact from foreign currency fluctuations during the first nine months of 2005 were offset by a negative impact in the fourth quarter of 2005.

35

Global sales of our eye care products decreased $27.8 million, or 8.5%, in 2005 from 2004. Sales of our eye care products decreased primarily due to decreased sales of hydrogen peroxide-based products, principally in Europe and Japan, where the migration to single-bottle cleaning regimens continues, and decreased sales of multipurpose solutions in Japan due to an increase in the market for daily disposable lenses. The favorable impact from foreign currency fluctuations during the first nine months of 2005 were offset by a negative impact in the fourth quarter of 2005.

As part of our product rationalization and repositioning plan to maximize our competitive advantage as the global refractive leader and improve the global penetration of our core cataract, refractive and eye care brands, we have discontinued a variety of non-strategic cataract surgical and eye care products that lack critical revenue mass, have experienced steadily declining sales trends and/or have generated relatively unattractive margins. We expect the growth of our promoted products to offset the revenue decline related to these discontinued products.

Net sales for 2004 increased by $140.6 million, or 23.4%, to $742.1 million in 2004 from $601.5 million in 2003. The increase in 2004 was the result of sales of products acquired in the Pfizer Acquisition, sales gains of existing products in both product lines and favorable foreign currency changes. Net sales of acquired products approximated $75.8 million. Foreign currency fluctuations, particularly related to the Japanese yen and the euro, increased sales by $37.5 million, or 6.2%, as compared to average rates in effect in 2003.

Net sales in the Americas, including the United States, increased $39.2 million, or 22.0%, in 2004 from 2003 and such increase was comprised of a $30.1 million increase in sales of ophthalmic surgical products and a $9.1 million increase in sales of eye care products. Net sales in the Americas include the favorable impact of foreign currency fluctuations of $1.6 million. The increase in sales of ophthalmic surgical products includes $21.0 million in sales of products acquired in the Pfizer Acquisition, including the Healon family of viscoelastics and Tecnis intraocular lenses, and increased sales of the Sensar intraocular lens and phacoemulsification products. The increase in sales of eye care products was primarily due to an increase in sales of Complete branded products.

Net sales in Europe/Africa/Middle East increased $51.6 million, or 24.3%, in 2004 from 2003 and such increase was comprised of a $47.8 million increase in sales of ophthalmic surgical products and a $3.8 million increase in sales of eye care products. Net sales in Europe/Africa/Middle East include the favorable impact of foreign currency fluctuations of $22.0 million primarily due to the strengthening of the euro versus the U.S. dollar. The increase in sales of ophthalmic surgical products includes $31.1 million in sales of products acquired in the Pfizer Acquisition, including the Healon family of viscoelastics and Tecnis intraocular lenses, and increased sales of the Sensar intraocular lens and phacoemulsification products.

Net sales in Japan increased $27.4 million, or 16.7%, in 2004 from 2003 and such increase was comprised of a $16.5 million increase in sales of ophthalmic surgical products and a $10.9 million increase in sales of eye care products. Net sales in Japan include the favorable impact of foreign currency fluctuations of $11.8 million resulting from the strengthening of the Japanese yen versus the U.S. dollar. The increase in sales of ophthalmic surgical products includes $18.2 million in sales of products acquired in the Pfizer Acquisition, including the Healon family of viscoelastics, and increased sales of the Sensar intraocular lens. The increase in sales of eye care products was primarily due to an increase in sales of Complete branded products and hydrogen peroxide-based products.

Net sales in Asia Pacific increased $22.4 million, or 47.8%, in 2004 from 2003 and such increase was comprised of a $12.5 million increase in sales of ophthalmic surgical products and a $9.9 million increase in sales of eye care products. Net sales in Asia Pacific include the favorable impact of foreign currency fluctuations of $2.1 million. The increase in sales of ophthalmic surgical products includes $5.5 million in sales of products acquired in the Pfizer Acquisition, including the Healon family of viscoelastics and CeeOn intraocular lenses, and increased sales of the Sensar intraocular lens and phacoemulsification products. The increase in sales of eye care products was primarily due to an increase in sales of Complete branded products and hydrogen peroxide-based products.

Global sales of our ophthalmic surgical products increased $106.9 million, or 34.9%, in 2004 from 2003. Sales of our ophthalmic surgical products increased primarily due to sales of products acquired in the Pfizer Acquisition of $75.8 million, including the Healon family of viscoelastics and the Tecnis and CeeOn intraocular lenses, and increased sales of Sensar intraocular lenses and phacoemulsification products and favorable currency changes. Foreign currency fluctuations in 2004 increased international ophthalmic surgical sales by $19.2 million, or 6.3%, as compared to average rates in effect in 2003.

Global sales of our eye care products increased $33.7 million, or 11.4%, in 2004 from 2003. Sales of our eye care products increased primarily due to an increase in sales of Complete branded products and hydrogen peroxide-based products and favorable currency changes. Foreign currency fluctuations in 2004 increased international eye care sales by $18.3 million, or 6.2%, as compared to average rates in effect in 2003.

36

For additional information relating to our geographic operating segments, including operating income (loss) and long-lived assets, see Note 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Income and expenses. The following table sets forth certain statement of operations items as a percentage of net sales:

Gross margin. Our gross margin percentage increased as a percentage of net sales by 2.9 percentage points to 61.6% in 2005 from 58.7% in 2004. The increase in gross margin was largely driven by sales growth in the higher margin Healon family of viscoelastics and sales of acquired VISX products. Gross profit for 2005 included a fourth quarter charge of $12.6 million, or a 1.4 percentage point impact on gross margin percentage, for inventory provisions associated with our product rationalization and business repositioning plan. Gross profit for 2005 was also negatively impacted by a $3.5 million charge, or a 0.4 percentage point impact, associated with manufacturing productivity improvements and integration related costs. Our gross margin percentage decreased as a percent of net sales by 3.4 percentage points to 58.7% in 2004 from 62.1% in 2003. Gross profit for 2004 included a charge of $28.1 million, or 3.8 percentage point impact on gross margin percentage, for manufacturing profit capitalized in inventory and expensed related to the Pfizer Acquisition. In addition, pre-production costs incurred at our manufacturing facility in Madrid, Spain, costs incurred for expansion of our manufacturing facility in Hangzhou, China, and higher costs of product supplied by Allergan contributed to the gross margin percentage decrease, which was partially offset by sales growth in the higher margin Complete branded line of eye care products and sales of the Healon family of viscoelastics.

Selling, general and administrative. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales was 43.1% in 2005, compared to 44.4% in 2004. Selling, general and administrative expenses in 2005 include approximately $14.6 million in acquisition and integration-related charges and amortization expense of $26.7 million related to acquired intangible assets. Selling, general and administrative expenses in 2005 also include an $8.6 million charge associated with the termination of a distributor agreement in India that we had with our former parent, Allergan. In addition, selling, general and administrative expenses in 2005 were impacted by selling costs associated with acquired VISX products of $16.2 million. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased as a percent of net sales by 1.6 percentage points to 44.4 % in 2004 from 46.0% in 2003. Selling, general and administrative expenses for 2004 include an aggregate $2.3 million charge to terminate a distributor contract following the decision to move to a direct sales model in Belgium as a result of the Pfizer Acquisition and severance paid to AMO employees considered redundant upon completion of the Pfizer Acquisition. Amortization of intangible assets was $5.6 million related to the acquired Pfizer intangible assets in 2004. Amortization of intangible assets was $0.1 million in 2003. In 2004, selling, general and administrative expenses also include an additional $9.3 million in acquisition integration-related charges.

Research and development. Research and development expenditures as a percentage of net sales in 2005 increased slightly as compared to 2004 and as a percentage of net sales remained relatively constant in 2004 as compared to 2003. Our research and development strategy is to develop proprietary products for vision correction that are safe and effective and address unmet needs. During 2005, we obtained FDA approval and launched the ReZoom Multifocal intraocular lens and the Tecnis Acrylic lens, a wavefront-designed monofocal intraocular lens . We are currently focusing on new advancements that build on our Tecnis, Healon and WhiteStar technology, corneal and lens-based solutions to presbyopia and dry eye products.

In-process research and development. In 2005, we incurred an in-process research and development (IPR&D) charge of $488.5 million related to the VISX Acquisition. This charge represented the estimated fair value of projects that, as of the

37

acquisition date, had not reached technological feasibility and had no alternative future use. The Company recorded $449.2 million of this amount in the second quarter of 2005 and $39.3 million in the third quarter of 2005. The additional charge in the third quarter of 2005 resulted primarily from the completion of the IPR&D valuation. The fair value assigned to IPR&D comprised the following projects: High Myopia for CustomVue - $14.7 million, Excimer Laser Improvements - $56.2 million and Presbyopia - $417.6 million. The fair value of these projects was determined by performing a discounted cash flow analysis using the “income” approach. Net cash flows attributable to these projects were discounted to their present values at a rate commensurate with the perceived risk, which for these projects ranged from 19.0 to 21.0 percent. High myopia for CustomVue was forecasted to be approved for sale in the U.S. in late 2005. FDA approval was received in September 2005. A procedure to treat presbyopia is forecasted to be approved for sale in the U.S. in late 2006. Additional research and development expenses needed prior to expected FDA approval for these procedures are expected to range from $4 million to $6 million. This range represents management’s best estimate as to the additional R&D expenses required to bring these products to market in the U.S. Additional research and development expenses in the range of $8 million to $10 million represent management’s best estimate as to the additional R&D expenses to bring excimer laser system improvements to market. Forecasted discounted cash flows for each product once launched include estimates for normal sustaining engineering and maintenance R&D. These projects are currently on track for the expected approval dates. However, the major risks and uncertainties associated with the timely and successful completion of these projects consist of the ability to confirm the safety and efficacy of the technology based on the data from clinical trials and obtaining the necessary approvals. We can provide no assurance that the approvals will be received on this schedule or at all.

In 2004, we incurred an IPR&D charge of $28.1 million related to the Pfizer Acquisition. This charge represented the estimated fair value of projects that, as of the acquisition date, had not reached technological feasibility and had no alternative future use. The estimated fair value assigned to IPR&D comprised the following projects: Tecnis Monofocal - $1.6 million and Tecnis Multifocal - $26.5 million. The estimated fair value of these IPR&D projects was estimated by performing a discounted cash flow analysis using the “income” approach. These cash flows were then discounted to a present value using a discount rate of 14.5%. Regulatory approval for the Tecnis Monofocal in Japan was expected and received in 2005. We also estimate that the Tecnis Multifocal will receive its PMA in the U.S. in 2008, with approval in Japan in 2008. Additional research and development expenses in the range of $2.5 million to $3.0 million for the Tecnis Multifocal represents our best estimate as to the additional research and development expenses to bring these products to market. These projects are currently on track for the expected approval dates. However, the major risks and uncertainties associated with the timely and successful completion of these projects consist of the ability to confirm the safety and efficacy of the technology based on the data from clinical trials and obtaining the necessary approvals. We can provide no assurance that the approvals will be received on this schedule or at all.

Business repositioning costs. On October 31, 2005, our Board of Directors approved a product rationalization and repositioning plan covering the discontinuation of non-strategic cataract surgical and eye care products and the elimination or redeployment of resources that support these product lines. The plan also includes organizational changes and potential reductions in force in manufacturing, sales and marketing associated with these product lines, as well as organizational changes in research and development and other corporate functions designed to align the organization with our strategy and strategic business unit organization. The plan further calls for increasing our investment in key growth opportunities, specifically our refractive implant product line and international laser vision correction business, and accelerating the implementation of productivity initiatives. We incurred $42.3 million in pre-tax charges during the fourth quarter of 2005 which included $12.6 million for inventory related charges included in cost of sales and $29.7 million included in operating expenses for severance, relocation and other one-time termination benefits of $14.0 million, asset write-downs of $9.2 million, contractual obligations of $2.7 million and accelerated productivity and brand repositioning costs of $3.8 million. We expect to incur an additional $28 million to $38 million in charges in the first half of 2006. These costs will be recognized as the services are performed and actions occur.

Operating income. Operating income (loss) was $(411.3) million, $33.0 million and $59.5 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Our 2005 operating loss was negatively impacted by an aggregate $559.9 million in charges primarily related to the VISX Acquisition and our product rationalization and business repositioning initiatives as discussed above.

Non-operating expense. Interest expense was $29.3 million, $26.9 million and $24.2 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Interest expense in 2005 includes a pro-rata write-off of debt issuance costs of $5.8 million primarily associated with the termination of the term loan, partially offset by the recognition of a realized gain on interest rate swaps of $0.8 million. In 2004, interest expense included a net charge of $6.5 million comprised of a charge of $9.7 million for the pro-rata write-off of debt issuance costs and write-off of original issue discount and one-time commitment fees net of a net realized gain on interest rate swaps of $3.2 million, all associated with the prepayment of the Japan term loan in June 2004, consummation of the June 2004 tender offer for $70.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 9 ¼% senior subordinated notes, the exchange of $131.4 million aggregate principal amount of the 3 ½% convertible senior subordinated notes and partial prepayment of the $250.0 million June 2004 term loan. Interest expense in 2003 included a net charge of $5.8 million comprised of a charge of $7.8 million for the pro-rata write-off of debt issuance costs and write-off of original issue discount net of a net realized gain on interest rate swaps of $2.0

38

million associated with the prepayment of a term loan in June 2003, the consummation of the “Modified Dutch Auction” tender offer for $115.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 9 ¼% senior subordinate notes in July 2003 and the repurchase of an additional $15.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 9 ¼% senior subordinate notes in September 2003. We anticipate interest expense to decrease in 2006 relative to 2005 due to the anticipated overall reduction in average borrowings outstanding during 2006 as well as the higher percentage of our relatively low fixed rate convertible debt versus our variable rate debt. The anticipated increase in interest rates throughout 2006 will slightly offset these benefits.

We recorded an unrealized (gain) loss on derivative instruments of $(2.6) million, $0.4 million and $0.2 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003 respectively. We record as “unrealized (gain) loss on derivative instruments” the mark to market adjustments on the outstanding foreign currency options and forward contracts which we entered into to reduce the volatility of expected earnings in currencies other than the U.S. dollar.

In 2005, the loss due to exchange of the 3 ½% convertible senior subordinated notes due 2023 of $1.9 million is comprised of a non-cash charge of $1.7 million and a cash charge of $0.2 million. In the second quarter of 2005, we exchanged 160,695 shares of common stock for $3.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 3 ½% convertible senior subordinated notes in a privately negotiated transaction. As a result, a non-cash charge of approximately $0.5 million representing the fair value of shares issued as a premium was recorded. In the fourth quarter of 2005, we exchanged 291,760 shares of common stock and approximately $0.4 million in cash for $5.6 million aggregate principal amount of the 3 ½% convertible senior subordinated notes in privately negotiated transactions. A non-cash charge of approximately $1.2 million and a cash charge of $0.2 million representing the fair value of shares issued as a premium were recorded.

In 2004, the loss due to exchange of the 3 ½% convertible senior subordinated notes of $116.3 million is comprised of a non-cash charge of $111.7 million and a cash charge of $4.6 million. In the second quarter of 2004, we exchanged approximately 5.8 million shares of common stock and $4.6 million of cash for approximately $108.6 million in aggregate principal amount of these notes. Because these notes were not convertible into equity at such time, a non-cash charge of $107.2 million and a cash charge of $4.6 million was recorded. The $107.2 million non-cash charge was comprised of a charge of $89.1 million representing the difference between the fair market value of 5.3 million shares of common stock issued in exchange for the notes and the principal amount of notes exchanged and a charge of $18.1 million representing the fair market value of 0.5 million shares of common stock issued as a premium. The $4.6 million cash charge represented cash issued as a premium. In the remainder of 2004, we exchanged approximately 1.2 million shares of common stock for approximately $22.8 million in aggregate principal amount of these notes. As a result, a non-cash charge of $4.5 million representing the fair value of shares issued as a premium was recorded.

Other net non-operating expense was $0.3 million for 2005. Other non-operating expense of $10.6 million for 2004 included $10.8 million paid for the repurchase of the 9 ¼%  senior subordinated notes and early debt extinguishment costs and fees of $0.1 million aggregating $10.9 million partially offset by foreign exchange gains and interest income. Other non-operating expense of $17.8 million for 2003 included an aggregate premium of $19.4 million paid for the partial repurchase of the 9 ¼% senior subordinated notes net of a foreign currency gain of $2.7 million resulting from the settlement of certain intercompany notes and related transfer of cash utilized for the prepayment of a term loan and partial repurchase of the 9 ¼% senior subordinated notes, which aggregated $16.8 million.

Income taxes. In 2005, we recorded a provision for income taxes of $12.9 million on a pre-tax loss of $440.3 million. The pre-tax loss in 2005 included an in-process research and development charge of $490.8 million, a non-cash charge of $1.7 million and a cash charge of $0.2 million related to the exchange of the 3 ½% convertible senior subordinated notes and a charge of $8.6 million associated with the termination of a distribution agreement in India with Allergan, for which no tax benefit was provided on these items. We have provided a tax provision at 33% on the remaining income, which was partially offset by tax benefits from the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 and final adjustments with Allergan, which are discussed below. Income taxes are provided on taxable income at the statutory rates applicable to such income and we have provided for U.S. federal income taxes and anticipated foreign withholding taxes on the undistributed earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries.

The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 was signed into law in October 2004, which allows companies to elect to repatriate cash into the United States in 2005 at a special, temporary effective tax rate of 5.25 percent. Based on our evaluation of the amount of foreign earnings that we have elected to treat under this special provision, the income tax benefit of the repatriation was $5.7 million in 2005.

The lower tax rate in 2005 reflects continuing implementation of our long-term tax strategies, as well as final adjustments of previously accrued pre-spin-off taxes attributable to our business in 2002 and payable to Allergan pursuant to a pre-spin tax sharing agreement. These adjustments included a $1.4 million benefit from the resolution of a discrete item in the third quarter, which was recorded in the income tax provision.

39

We believe our future effective income tax rate may vary depending on our mix of domestic and international taxable income or loss and the various tax and treasury methodologies that we implement, including our policy regarding repatriation of future accumulated foreign earnings.

In 2004, we recorded a provision for income taxes of $8.2 million even though we had a pre-tax loss of $121.2 million. We recorded such provision as no tax benefit has been recognized for the IPR&D charge of $28.1 million nor for the aggregate charge of $116.3 million related to the exchange of the 3 ½% convertible senior subordinated notes. Income taxes are provided on taxable income at the statutory rates applicable to such income and we have provided for U.S. federal income taxes and foreign withholding taxes on the undistributed earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries. We provided a tax provision at 35% on the remaining income in 2004, compared to the effective tax rate of 40% in 2003. The lower tax rate in 2004 reflected continuing implementation of our long-term tax strategies.

Net earnings (loss). Net earnings (loss) was $(453.2) million, $(129.4) million and $10.4 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The net loss in 2005 included an aggregate after-tax charge of $536.9 million, primarily due to the VISX Acquisition, business repositioning costs, integration related costs, and termination of a distributor agreement in India, write-off of debt issuance costs and exchange of the 3 ½% convertible senior subordinated notes, partially offset by tax benefits from the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 and final adjustments with Allergan.

The net loss in 2004 included an aggregate after-tax charge of $175.5 million related to the following: the manufacturing profit capitalized in inventory and expensed related to the Pfizer Acquisition; the charge to terminate a distributor contract following the decision to move to a direct sales model in Belgium as a result of the Pfizer Acquisition and severance paid to AMO employees considered redundant upon completion of the Pfizer Acquisition; the in-process research and development charge related to the Pfizer Acquisition; the pro-rata write-off of debt issuance costs and write-off of original issue discount net of a net realized gain on interest rate swaps; and the charges related to the repurchase of the 9 ¼%  senior subordinated notes and the exchange of the 3 ½% convertible senior subordinated notes.

Net earnings in 2003 included an aggregate after-tax charge of $13.5 million related to the pro-rata write-off of debt issuance costs and write-off of original issue discount net of a net realized gain on interest rate swaps and a net charge related to the prepayment of a term loan and partial repurchase of the 9 ¼%  senior subordinated notes.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Management assesses our liquidity by our ability to generate cash to fund operations. Significant factors in the management of liquidity are: funds generated by operations; levels of accounts receivable, inventories, accounts payable and capital expenditures; adequate lines of credit; and financial flexibility to attract long-term capital on satisfactory terms. As of December 31, 2005, we had cash and equivalents of $40.8 million.

Historically, we have generated cash from operations in excess of working capital requirements, and we expect to do so in the future. Net cash provided by operating activities in 2005 was $20.8 million compared to $39.7 million in 2004 and $48.0 million in 2003. Operating cash flow decreased in 2005 compared to 2004 due to increases in cash paid for income taxes, timing of accounts payable payments and inventory buildup, partially offset by the favorable impact of the VISX acquisition and timing of accounts receivable collections. The inventory buildup was due in part to “bridging” stock related to the recent transfer of eye care manufacturing from Allergan and the increases in the size and scope of our global manufacturing network. Operating cash flow decreased in 2004 compared to 2003 primarily as a result of early debt extinguishment costs paid in cash and an increase in accounts receivable partially offset by an increase in accounts payable. The increase in accounts receivable was primarily due to the additional sales of acquired Pfizer products and the increase in accounts payable was primarily due to the additional costs incurred in operating the acquired Pfizer manufacturing facilities in Uppsala, Sweden, Groningen, Netherlands and Bangalore, India and expansion of our eye care manufacturing facilities in Madrid, Spain and Hangzhou, China in preparation for our transition of eye care manufacturing from Allergan. Additionally, in February 2004, we received approximately $4.7 million from Allergan. This payment ended a dispute between us and Allergan regarding the ownership of a certain value added tax receivable due from France. As part of the settlement with Allergan, we were responsible for paying penalties and expenses associated with the receivable, which aggregated less than $0.5 million.

Net cash used in investing activities was $79.9 million, $482.2 million, and $41.1 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The 2005 capital expenditures are primarily comprised of expenditures to upgrade our viscoelastics manufacturing facility in Uppsala, Sweden. The 2005 amount includes $36.9 million net cash paid primarily for the acquisition of VISX. The 2004 capital expenditures are primarily comprised of expansion of our manufacturing facilities in preparation for the transition away from the Allergan manufacturing agreement, expenditures at the acquired manufacturing facilities and construction of research and development facilities at our leased headquarters. The 2004 amount also includes the $456.7 million Pfizer Acquisition purchase price, which was financed with a portion of the proceeds from the issuance of $350.0 million of 2 ½% convertible senior subordinated notes and a $250.0 million term loan. In November 2003, we completed the purchase of an

40

existing manufacturing facility in Madrid, Spain. We financed the approximately $21.4 million purchase of this facility with available cash and borrowings under our senior credit facility. Expenditures for property, plant and equipment totaled $23.1 million, $17.5 million, and $12.6 million in 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively. We expect to incur significant capital expenditures with respect to the Uppsala, Sweden manufacturing facility during the next year in order to separate the facility from existing Pfizer operations. Expenditures for demonstration (demo) and bundled equipment, primarily phacoemulsification and microkeratome surgical equipment, were $11.1 million, $6.8 million, and $7.0 million in 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively. We maintain demo and bundled equipment to facilitate future sales of similar equipment and related products to our customers. Expenditures for capitalized internal-use software were $8.8 million, $2.4 million, and $0.7 million in 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively. The 2005 software expenditures were due to acquisition related integrations and improvements to support common global technology platforms. We capitalize internal-use software costs after technical feasibility has been established. In 2006, we expect to invest approximately $ 60.0 million to $ 70.0 million in property, plant and equipment, demo and bundled equipment, and capitalized software as part of the overall expansion of our business.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $54.0 million in 2005, which comprised $150.0 million of proceeds from the issuance of the 1.375% convertible senior subordinated notes, $60.0 million of borrowings primarily under the senior revolving credit facility, $45.8 million of proceeds from the sale of stock to employees and $0.8 million proceeds received after settling an interest rate swap agreement, reduced by $194.2 million of debt repayments and $8.4 million of financing related costs.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $442.2 million in 2004, which primarily comprised $350.0 million of proceeds from the issuance of the 2 ½% convertible senior subordinated notes and a $250.0 million term loan, partially offset by repayment of debt of $149.2 million and financing related costs of $16.6 million.

Net cash used in financing activities was $43.5 million in 2003, which primarily comprised $162.4 million of long-term debt borrowings and $6.0 million from the sale of stock to employees reduced by long-term debt repayments of $205.0 million and financing related costs of $7.3 million.

In January 2005, we entered into an amendment to our senior credit facility to provide for an increase of $100.0 million in the revolving loan commitments and an additional $100.0 million in term loan commitments. On May 27, 2005, we and certain of our subsidiaries, as guarantors thereunder, entered into an amendment to provide for an additional increase of $100.0 million in the revolving loan commitments under the senior credit facility, which amounts were made available to us to finance, in part, our acquisition of VISX, and are available for working capital and other general corporate purposes subject to satisfaction of certain conditions. This amendment also provides for termination of $100.0 million of existing term loan commitment. The amendment increased the revolving loan commitments to $300.0 million. The maturity of the senior credit facility on June 25, 2009 remains unchanged.

On May 27, 2005, we borrowed approximately $200.0 million under the senior revolving credit facility to fund the cash portion of the VISX Acquisition. In June 2005, we repaid approximately $123.0 million of revolver borrowings with acquired VISX cash.

At December 31, 2005, we had $50.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility. Approximately $18.7 million of the revolving credit facility was reserved to support letters of credit issued on our behalf for normal operating purposes and we had approximately $231.3 million undrawn and available revolving loan commitments. At December 31, 2005, we had $10.0 million of borrowings outstanding under a short-term loan from Bank of Ireland to our subsidiary, AMO Ireland. This loan was supported by a $10.0 million letter of credit which was part of the $18.7 million of letters of credit noted previously. This loan was paid in its entirety on February 21, 2006 and is no longer available for borrowing.

Our senior credit facility provides that we will maintain certain financial and operating covenants which include, among other provisions, maintaining specific leverage and coverage ratios. Certain covenants under the senior credit facility may limit the incurrence of additional indebtedness. The senior credit facility prohibits dividend payments. We were in compliance with these covenants at December 31, 2005. Our senior credit facility is secured by a first priority perfected lien on, and pledge of, all of the combined company’s present and future property and assets (subject to certain exclusions), 100% of the stock of the domestic subsidiaries, 66% of the stock of the foreign subsidiaries and all present and future intercompany debts.

In the second quarter of 2005, we exchanged 160,695 shares of common stock for $3.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3 ½% convertible senior subordinated notes in a privately negotiated transaction. In the fourth quarter of 2005, we exchanged 291,760 shares of common stock and approximately $0.4 million in cash for $5.6 million aggregate principal amount of 3 ½% convertible senior subordinated notes in privately negotiated transactions.

41

On July 18, 2005, we issued $150.0 million of 1.375% convertible senior subordinated notes (Senior Subordinated Notes) due July 1, 2025. Interest on the Senior Subordinated Notes is payable on January 1 and July 1 of each year, commencing on January 1, 2006. The Senior Subordinated Notes are convertible into 21.0084 shares of our common stock for each $1,000 principal amount of the Senior Subordinated Notes (conversion price of approximately $47.60 per share), subject to adjustment. The Senior Subordinated Notes may be converted, at the option of the holders, into cash or under certain circumstances, cash and shares of our common stock at any time on or prior to the trading day preceding June 1, 2011. We have elected to satisfy in cash the conversion obligation with respect to the principal amount of the Senior Subordinated Notes.

On July 21, 2005, we paid off the balance of our term loan, including approximately $149.1 million of principal and approximately $1.2 million of accrued interest, using the net proceeds from the 1.375% convertible senior subordinated notes and existing cash. As a result of the repayment, the term loan is no longer available for borrowing.

Our cash position includes amounts denominated in foreign currencies, and the repatriation of those cash balances from some of our non-U.S. subsidiaries may result in additional tax costs. However, these cash balances are generally available without legal restriction to fund ordinary business operations.

We believe that the net cash provided by our operating activities, supplemented as necessary with borrowings available under our revolving credit facility and existing cash and equivalents, will provide sufficient resources to fund the expected 2006 capital expenditures, and to meet our working capital requirements, debt service and other cash needs over the next year.

We are partially dependent upon the reimbursement policies of government and private health insurance companies. Government and private sector initiatives to limit the growth of health care costs, including price regulation and competitive pricing, are continuing in many countries where we do business. As a result of these changes, the marketplace has placed increased emphasis on the delivery of more cost-effective medical therapies. While we have been unaware of significant price resistance resulting from the trend toward cost containment, changes in reimbursement policies and other reimbursement methodologies and payment levels could have an adverse effect on our pricing flexibility.

Additionally, the current trend among U.S. hospitals and other customers of medical device manufacturers is to consolidate into larger purchasing groups to enhance purchasing power. The enhanced purchasing power of these larger customers may also increase the pressure on product pricing, although we are unable to estimate the potential impact at this time.

Inflation. Although at reduced levels in recent years, inflation may cause upward pressure on the cost of goods and services used by us. The competitive and regulatory environments in many markets substantially limit our ability to fully recover these higher costs through increased selling prices. We continually seek to mitigate the adverse effects of inflation through cost containment and improved productivity and manufacturing processes.

Foreign currency fluctuations. Approximately 67%, 75%, and 74% of our revenues in the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, were derived from operations outside the United States, and a significant portion of our cost structure is denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, primarily the Japanese yen and the euro. Therefore, we are subject to fluctuations in sales and earnings reported in U.S. dollars as a result of changing currency exchange rates.

The impact of foreign currency fluctuations on sales was a $0.2 million decrease in 2005, $37.5 million and $48.1 million increase in 2004 and 2003, respectively. The sales increases in 2004 and 2003 were due primarily to a strengthening of the Japanese yen and euro versus the U.S. dollar.

Contractual obligations. The following represents a list of our material contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2005:

(a) excludes short-term borrowings of $60.0 million.

42

Off-balance sheet arrangements. We had no off-balance sheet arrangements at December 31, 2005.

New Accounting Standards

In November 2004, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 151, “Inventory Costs-an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4” (SFAS No. 151), was issued. This Statement amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing,” to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). SFAS No. 151 is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. We do not expect adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a revision of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (SFAS No. 123R). SFAS No. 123R supersedes Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (Opinion 25), and its related implementation guidance and eliminates the alternative to use Opinion 25’s intrinsic value method of accounting that was provided in Statement 123 as originally issued. Under Opinion 25, issuing stock options to employees generally resulted in recognition of no compensation cost. SFAS No. 123R requires entities to recognize the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of those awards (with limited exceptions). SFAS No. 123R is effective for the first annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. On March 29, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 107 (SAB 107), which expresses the views of the SEC regarding the interaction between SFAS No. 123R and certain SEC rules and regulations and provides the SEC’s views regarding the valuation of share-based payment arrangements for public companies. In particular, SAB 107 provides guidance related to share-based payment transactions with nonemployees, the transition from nonpublic to public entity status, valuation methods (including assumptions such as expected volatility and expected term), the accounting for certain redeemable financial instrument issues under share-based payment arrangements, the classification of compensation expense, non-GAAP financial measures, first-time adoption of SFAS No. 123R in an interim period, capitalization of compensation costs related to share-based payment arrangements, the accounting for income tax effects of share-based payment arrangements upon adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the modification of employee share options prior to adoption of SFAS No. 123R, and disclosures in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations subsequent to adoption of SFAS No. 123R. We will adopt SFAS No. 123R in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. As a result of the provisions of SFAS No. 123R and SAB 107, we expect the compensation charge under SFAS No. 123R to reduce diluted net income per share by approximately $0.15 to $0.20 per share for fiscal 2006. However, the assessment of the estimated compensation charge is affected by stock prices as well as assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables and the related tax impact. These variables include, but are not limited to, the volatility of the stock price and employee stock option exercise behaviors.

In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FSP 109-1, “Application of FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (FSP No. 109-1), to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.”  The American Jobs Creation Act (AJCA) introduces a special 9% tax deduction on qualified production activities. FSP No. 109-1 clarifies that this tax deduction should be accounted for as a special tax deduction in accordance with Statement 109. Although FSP No. 109-1 is effective immediately, we have not completed the analysis and do not expect to be able to complete the analysis until after Congress or the Treasury Department provides additional clarifying language on the key elements of the provision. Based on our current analysis, the adoption of FSP No. 109-1 does not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FSP 109-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004” (FSP No. 109-2). The AJCA introduces an elected limited time 85% dividends received deduction on the repatriation of certain foreign earnings to a U.S. taxpayer (repatriation provision), provided certain criteria are met. FSP No. 109-2 provides accounting and disclosure guidance for the repatriation provision. During the fourth quarter of 2005, we elected to repatriate $43.2 million of eligible foreign earnings. Since we provide taxes currently on foreign earnings, the election of this provision enabled us to realize a tax benefit of $5.7 million during the fourth quarter of 2005.

In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3.” SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements for changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS No. 154 also requires that retrospective application of a change in accounting principle be limited to the direct effects of the change. Indirect effects of a change in accounting principle, such as a change in non-discretionary profit-sharing payments resulting from an accounting change, should be recognized in the period of the accounting change. SFAS No. 154 also requires that a change in depreciation, amortization, or depletion method for long-lived, non-financial assets be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate effected by a change in accounting principle.

43

SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. Early adoption is permitted for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after the date this Statement is issued. We are  required to adopt the provisions of SFAS 154, as applicable, beginning in fiscal 2006. We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We routinely monitor the risks associated with fluctuations in currency exchange rates and interest rates. We address these risks through controlled risk management that may include the use of derivative financial instruments to economically hedge or reduce these exposures. We do not expect to enter into financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Given the inherent limitations of forecasting and the anticipatory nature of the exposures intended to be hedged, there can be no assurance that such programs will offset more than a portion of the adverse financial impact resulting from unfavorable movements in either interest or foreign exchange rates. In addition, the timing of the accounting for recognition of gains and losses related to mark-to-market instruments for any given period may not coincide with the timing of gains and losses related to the underlying economic exposures and, therefore, may adversely affect our operating results and financial position.

To ensure the adequacy and effectiveness of our interest rate and foreign exchange hedge positions, we continually monitor, from an accounting and economic perspective, our interest rate swap positions and foreign exchange forward and option positions, when applicable, both on a stand-alone basis and in conjunction with our underlying interest rate and foreign currency exposures.

Interest rate risk. At December 31, 2005, our debt comprises primarily domestic borrowings of which $500.0 million is fixed rate debt and $60.0 million is variable rate debt.

In July 2004, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement, which effectively converted the interest rate on $125.0 million of term loan borrowings from a floating rate to a fixed rate. This interest rate swap qualified as a cash flow hedge and would have matured in July 2006. In April 2005, we terminated the interest rate swap. Upon termination, we received approximately $0.8 million and included the related gain of approximately $0.5 million, which includes the accrued but unpaid net amount between us and the swap counterparty, as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in the second quarter of 2005. As a result of the repayment of the term loan in July 2005, the gain on the interest rate swap of $0.8 million was fully recognized as a reduction to the interest expense in the third quarter of 2005. At December 31, 2005, there are no outstanding interest rate swaps.

In 2002, we entered into two interest rate swap agreements, which effectively converted the interest rate on $150.0 million of the 9 ¼% senior subordinated notes from a fixed to a floating rate and converted the interest rate on $50.0 million of term loan borrowings from a floating to a fixed rate. The interest rate swaps had maturity dates beginning in 2005 and qualified as either fair value or cash flow hedges. Changes in fair value of the interest rate swap agreement qualifying as a cash flow hedge were recorded in other comprehensive income to the extent such changes were effective and as long as the cash flow hedge requirements were met. In May 2003 and October 2002, we realized the value of the interest rate swaps qualifying as fair value hedges. We received an aggregate of approximately $14.8 million, of which approximately $6.3 million represented the net settlement of the accrued but unpaid amount between us and the swap counterparties. The remaining amount of approximately $8.5 million was recorded as an adjustment to the carrying amount of the 9 ¼% senior subordinated notes as a premium and was being amortized over the remaining life of the 9 ¼% senior subordinated notes. At December 31, 2003, after recognizing a pro-rata portion of the gain upon repurchase of a portion of the 9 ¼% senior subordinated notes, the unamortized gain on these interest rate swaps was $3.5 million. As a result of the June 2004 repurchase of the remaining 9 ¼% senior subordinated notes, the remaining unamortized gain on the interest rate swaps was fully recognized.

In May 2003, we terminated the interest rate swap qualifying as a cash flow hedge. We paid approximately $2.4 million and included the related loss of approximately $2.3 million as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. As a result of the prepayment of the term loan in June 2003, the loss on the interest rate swap was fully recognized as interest expense.

44

The tables below present information about our debt obligations and interest rate derivatives for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004:

December 31, 2005