WNS (HOLDINGS) LTD
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 6-K
Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarter ended December 31, 2008
Commission File Number 00132945
WNS (HOLDINGS) LIMITED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in the charter)
Not Applicable
(Translation of Registrants name into English)
Jersey, Channel Islands
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
Gate 4, Godrej & Boyce Complex
Pirojshanagar, Vikroli (W)
Mumbai 400 079, India
+91-22-6797-6100
(Address of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form
20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F þ Form 40-F o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form
is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes o No þ
If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to registrant in connection with Rule
12g3-2(b): Not applicable.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
WNS (Holdings) Limited is incorporating by reference the information set forth in this
Form 6-K into its registration statement on Form S-8 (Registration No: 333-136168).
Conventions used in this Report
In this report, references to US are to the United States of America, its territories and its
possessions. References to UK are to the United Kingdom. References to India are to the
Republic of India. References to $ or dollars or US dollars are to the legal currency of the
US and references to Rs. or rupees or Indian rupees are to the legal currency of India.
References to GBP or pounds sterling or £ are to the legal currency of the UK and references
to EUR or are to Euros. References to pence are to the legal currency of Jersey, Channel
Islands. Our financial statements are presented in US dollars and are prepared in accordance with
US generally accepted accounting principles, or US GAAP. References to a particular fiscal year
are to our fiscal year ended March 31 of that year. Any discrepancies in any table between totals
and sums of the amounts listed are due to rounding.
We also refer in various places within this report to revenue less repair payments, which is a
non-GAAP measure that is calculated as revenue less payments to automobile repair centers and more
fully explained in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations. The presentation of this non-GAAP information is not meant to be considered in
isolation or as a substitute for our financial results prepared in accordance with US GAAP.
Special note regarding forward looking statements
This report contains forward-looking statements that are based on our current expectations,
assumptions, estimates and projections about our company and our industry. The forward-looking
statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Generally, these forward-looking
statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as anticipate,
believe, estimate, expect, intend, will, project, seek, should and similar
expressions. Those statements include, among other things, the discussions of our business strategy
and expectations concerning our market position, future operations, margins, profitability,
liquidity and capital resources. We caution you that reliance on any forward-looking statement
involves risks and uncertainties, and that although we believe that the assumptions on which our
forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, any of those assumptions could prove to be
inaccurate, and, as a result, the forward-looking statements based on those assumptions could be
materially incorrect. These factors include but are not limited to:
|
|
technological innovation; |
|
|
|
telecommunications or technology disruptions; |
|
|
|
future regulatory actions and conditions in our operating areas; |
|
|
|
our dependence on a limited number of clients and a limited number of industries; |
|
|
|
our ability to attract and retain clients; |
|
|
|
our ability to expand our business or effectively manage growth; |
|
|
|
our ability to hire and retain enough sufficiently trained employees to support our
operations; |
|
|
|
negative public reaction in the US or the UK to offshore outsourcing; |
|
|
|
regulatory, legislative and judicial developments; |
|
|
|
increasing competition in the business process outsourcing industry; |
|
|
|
political or economic instability in India, Sri Lanka and Jersey; |
1
|
|
worldwide economic and business conditions; |
|
|
|
our ability to successfully grow our revenues, expand our service offerings and market
share and achieve accretive benefits from our acquisition of Aviva Global Services Singapore
Private Limited, or Aviva Global, and our master services agreement with Aviva Global Services
(Management Services) Private Limited, or AVIVA MS, as described below; and |
|
|
|
our ability to successfully consummate strategic acquisitions. |
These and other factors are more fully discussed in our other filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, or the SEC, including in Risk Factors, Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and elsewhere in our annual report on Form 20-F
for our fiscal year ended March 31, 2008. In light of these and other uncertainties, you should not
conclude that we will necessarily achieve any plans, objectives or projected financial results
referred to in any of the forward-looking statements. Except as required by law, we do not
undertake to release revisions of any of these forward-looking statements to reflect future events
or circumstances.
2
Part I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
WNS (HOLDINGS) LIMITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
36,628 |
|
|
$ |
102,698 |
|
Bank deposits and marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,074 |
|
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance of $1,895 and $1,784, respectively |
|
|
62,221 |
|
|
|
47,302 |
|
Accounts receivable related parties |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
Funds held for clients |
|
|
4,909 |
|
|
|
6,473 |
|
Employee receivables |
|
|
1,126 |
|
|
|
1,179 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
4,440 |
|
|
|
3,776 |
|
Prepaid income taxes |
|
|
3,256 |
|
|
|
2,776 |
|
Deferred tax assets current |
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
Foreign currency derivative contracts current |
|
|
10,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
17,959 |
|
|
|
8,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
141,442 |
|
|
|
182,078 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
85,093 |
|
|
|
87,470 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
227,418 |
|
|
|
9,393 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
54,014 |
|
|
|
50,840 |
|
Other assets non current |
|
|
2,719 |
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
8,420 |
|
|
|
7,391 |
|
Deferred tax assets non current |
|
|
16,129 |
|
|
|
8,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
535,235 |
|
|
$ |
346,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
22,905 |
|
|
$ |
15,562 |
|
Accounts payable related parties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Long term debt current |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Short term line of credit |
|
|
5,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued employee costs |
|
|
25,215 |
|
|
|
26,848 |
|
Deferred revenue current |
|
|
6,326 |
|
|
|
7,790 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
4,693 |
|
|
|
1,879 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities current |
|
|
1,489 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
Accrual for earn-out payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,699 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
35,882 |
|
|
|
25,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
122,021 |
|
|
|
111,801 |
|
Long term debt non current |
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue non current |
|
|
3,134 |
|
|
|
1,549 |
|
Deferred rent |
|
|
2,301 |
|
|
|
2,627 |
|
Accrued pension liability |
|
|
2,152 |
|
|
|
1,544 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities non current |
|
|
10,709 |
|
|
|
1,834 |
|
Liability on outstanding derivative and interest swap contracts non current |
|
|
11,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
|
|
332,135 |
|
|
|
119,355 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares, $0.16 (10 pence) par value, authorized: 50,000,000 shares; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued and outstanding: 42,582,566 and 42,363,100 shares, respectively |
|
|
6,664 |
|
|
|
6,622 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
180,182 |
|
|
|
167,459 |
|
Ordinary shares subscribed: Nil and 1,666 shares, respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
44,471 |
|
|
|
38,839 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(28,337 |
) |
|
|
14,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
202,980 |
|
|
|
227,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
535,235 |
|
|
$ |
346,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
3
WNS (HOLDINGS) LIMITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third parties |
|
$ |
133,289 |
|
|
$ |
114,781 |
|
|
$ |
404,250 |
|
|
$ |
341,268 |
|
Related parties |
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
864 |
|
|
|
2,501 |
|
|
|
2,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,010 |
|
|
|
115,645 |
|
|
|
406,751 |
|
|
|
343,746 |
|
Cost of revenue |
|
|
97,030 |
|
|
|
91,862 |
|
|
|
310,429 |
|
|
|
274,536 |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
36,980 |
|
|
|
23,783 |
|
|
|
96,322 |
|
|
|
69,210 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
18,902 |
|
|
|
17,777 |
|
|
|
58,403 |
|
|
|
51,282 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
7,419 |
|
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
16,900 |
|
|
|
2,205 |
|
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,464 |
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
10,659 |
|
|
|
5,109 |
|
|
|
21,019 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
Other (expense) income, net |
|
|
(4,113 |
) |
|
|
2,052 |
|
|
|
(5,901 |
) |
|
|
6,963 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(3,955 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(7,322 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
2,591 |
|
|
|
7,140 |
|
|
|
7,796 |
|
|
|
7,199 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(705 |
) |
|
|
(1,686 |
) |
|
|
(2,344 |
) |
|
|
(3,759 |
) |
Income before minority interests |
|
|
1,886 |
|
|
|
5,454 |
|
|
|
5,452 |
|
|
|
3,440 |
|
Minority interest share of loss |
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,066 |
|
|
$ |
5,454 |
|
|
|
5,632 |
|
|
$ |
3,440 |
|
|
|
|
Basic income per share |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
Diluted income per share |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
See accompanying notes.
4
WNS (HOLDINGS) LIMITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
40,441 |
|
|
$ |
20,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions, net of cash received |
|
|
(291,225 |
) |
|
|
(34,815 |
) |
Facility and property cost |
|
|
(16,800 |
) |
|
|
(21,725 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of assets, net |
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
Transfer of delivery centre to AVIVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,570 |
|
Marketable securities and deposits |
|
|
7,687 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(300,119 |
) |
|
|
(42,869 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
1,851 |
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
|
|
1,544 |
|
|
|
1,987 |
|
Proceeds from long term debt, net |
|
|
199,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Public Offering expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
Short term borrowing availed |
|
|
7,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
Short term borrowing repaid |
|
|
(9,244 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Principal payments under capital leases |
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
200,640 |
|
|
|
3,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(7,032 |
) |
|
|
2,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(66,070) |
) |
|
|
(15,815 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
102,698 |
|
|
|
112,340 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
36,628 |
|
|
$ |
96,525 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
5
WNS (HOLDINGS) LIMITED
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
1. Basis of presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of WNS (Holdings) Limited
(the Company or WNS) have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted
accounting principles (US GAAP) for interim financial reporting and with the instructions of Rule
10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all information and footnotes required by
US GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (including
normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.
Operating results for the three-month and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2008 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending March 31, 2009.
The balance sheet at March 31, 2008 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that
date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by US GAAP for complete
financial statements. For further information, refer to the audited consolidated financial
statements and footnotes thereto of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2008.
2. Acquisitions
AVIVA Global Services Singapore Private Limited (Aviva Global)
On July 11, 2008, WNS entered into a transaction with Aviva International Holdings Limited
(AVIVA) comprising a share sale and purchase agreement (SSPA) and a master services agreement
with Aviva Global Services (Management Services) Private Limited (AVIVA MSA). Pursuant to the
SSPA with AVIVA, the Company acquired all the shares of Aviva Global Services Singapore Private
Limited (Aviva Global) in July 2008. With this acquisition, the Company solidified its position
as an offshore business process outsourcing (BPO) provider. This acquisition promotes the
Companys strategy of expanding market share in target industries, extends the Companys scale, and
bolsters the Companys service offerings in the insurance industry.
Pursuant to the AVIVA MSA, the Company has agreed to provide BPO services to AVIVAs UK and
Canadian businesses for a term of eight years and four months. Under the terms of this agreement,
the Company has agreed to provide a comprehensive spectrum of life and general insurance processing
functions to AVIVA, including policy administration and settlement, along with finance and
accounting, customer care and other support services. In addition, the Company has the exclusive
right to provide certain services such as finance and accounting, insurance back-office, customer
interaction and analytics services to AVIVAs UK and Canadian businesses for the first five years,
subject to the rights and obligations of the AVIVA group under their existing contracts with other
providers.
Aviva Global was the business process offshoring subsidiary of AVIVA with facilities in Bangalore,
India, and Colombo, Sri Lanka. The Company had previously provided BPO services to AVIVA from the
Sri Lankan facility pursuant to a Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) contract. Aviva Global had
exercised its option and acquired the Sri Lanka business on July 2, 2007. With the acquisition of
Aviva Global, the Company acquired the Bangalore operations and resumed control of the Sri Lanka
operations. The Company also provided BPO services to AVIVA pursuant to BOT contracts through its
wholly owned subsidiary, Ntrance Customer Services Private Limited (Ntrance), from its facility
in Pune, India, which has remained with the Company as a result of this transaction. In addition,
third party BPO providers provided BPO services to Aviva Global under similar BOT contracts from a
facility in Chennai, India through Customer Operational Services (Chennai) Private Limited (COSC)
and a facility in Pune, India through Noida Customer Operations Private Limited (NCOP),
respectively. Aviva Global exercised its option to require the third party BPO providers to
transfer COSC and NCOP to Aviva Global. The transfers of COSC and NCOP to Aviva Global were
completed on July 21, 2008 and August 10, 2008, respectively.
6
WNS (HOLDINGS) LIMITED
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
Aviva Global has five subsidiaries, namely Aviva Global Shared Services Private Limited, Aviva
Global Services (Bangalore) Private Limited (together with Aviva Global Shared Services Private
Limited, Aviva Bangalore), Aviva Global Services Lanka (Private) Limited (Aviva Sri Lanka),
COSC and NCOP.
The results of operations of Aviva Bangalore and Aviva Sri Lanka have been included in the
Companys consolidated statement of operations from July 11, 2008. The results of operations of
COSC and NCOP have been included in the Companys consolidated statement of operations from July
21, 2008 and August 10, 2008, respectively.
The purchase price paid to AVIVA for the Aviva Global acquisition was £112,376 ($225,204 based on
the exchange rate on July 11, 2008), subject to adjustments for cash, debt and the net asset values
of COSC and NCOP as of their transfer dates to Aviva Global on July 21, 2008 and August 10, 2008,
respectively. In addition, the Company paid for the acquisitions of COSC and NCOP at the net
purchase price of £6,971 ($13,926 based on the exchange rate on July 21, 2008) and £1,909 ($3,668
based on the exchange rate on August 10, 2008), respectively, subject to closing accounts
adjustments as of the respective transfer dates to Aviva Global. Legal and professional fees
pertaining to this transaction aggregating to approximately $8,200 have also been considered as
part of the acquisition cost. Thus, the total purchase price for the Aviva Global acquisition was
$250,998, subject to closing accounts adjustments.
The Company is still in the process of ascertaining the closing accounts adjustments for all the
acquired entities of Aviva Global. The accounting adjustments for working capital and other assets
are in the process of being finalized with the seller. The purchase consideration will be
reallocated between the net assets acquired and goodwill recorded on acquisition after these
adjustments are finalized.
The
preliminary purchase price allocation has resulted in a negative goodwill amounting to $2,653 which was adjusted on a pro-rata
basis to intangible assets and property, plant and equipment.
The total estimated cost of the Aviva Global acquisition has been allocated to the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed based on a preliminary determination of their fair value. This allocation
is based upon valuations using managements estimates and assumptions. The following table
summarizes the preliminary allocation:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
17,118 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
16,113 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
9,933 |
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
13,750 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
45,948 |
|
Client contracts |
|
|
175,899 |
|
Leasehold benefits |
|
|
1,835 |
|
Beneficial buy-out option for premises |
|
|
2,302 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
(23,042 |
) |
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
(8,858 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration |
|
$ |
250,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
As part of acquisition of Aviva Global, the Company has formalized a plan to restructure the
operations of the COSC operations, pursuant to which a significant portion of the leased premises
of Chennai would be surrendered to the landlord by March 2009. Consequently, the management has valued
leasehold improvement pertaining to those surrendered portions at zero value and also recorded
minimum lease rental as liability amounting to $914 calculated from the date of acquisition until
March 2009. The above plan will not entail any employee terminations or relocations.
7
WNS (HOLDINGS) LIMITED
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
The Company has valued the intangible for customer contracts and customer relationships using the
income approach by discounting future cash flows and tax amortization benefit.
NCOP and Ntrance have certain leasehold property agreements containing a purchase option clause at
an agreed price of $3,300 and $2,100, respectively, which is less than the actual market
price of the property. During the current quarter, the Company concluded on exercising these
purchase options. The respective options in favor of NCOP and Ntrance were valued during the
current quarter at $3,600 and $2,300, respectively. The Company exercised the buy
option for its NCOP premises on December 1, 2008 at the agreed price. Accordingly, the option in
favor of NCOP valued at $3,600 has been recorded as part of property, plant and equipment.
The option in favor of Ntrance valued at $2,300 is recognized as intangible assets without
any amortization.
These leasehold benefits have been valued in the quarter ended December 31, 2008 based on the
Comparative Income Differential Method (CIDM). CIDM estimates the income differential an asset is
expected to generate relative to its absence.
The customer relationships and client contracts acquired are being amortized over the duration of
the AVIVA MSA, being a period of eight years and four months. Leasehold benefits are amortized over
the remaining terms of the respective property lease agreements.
Chang Limited (together with its subsidiary Call 24/7 Limited, Call 24/7)
On April 7, 2008, the Company completed the acquisition of Chang Limited, UK along with its
subsidiary, Call 24/7 Limited, the key operating entity (collectively referred to as Call 24/7).
Call 24/7 provides a consolidated suite of services towards accident management, including credit
hire and credit repair for Non fault repairs business. Non fault services are mainly credit hire
and credit repair services provided when an individual has an accident where he is not at fault but
has a damaged car which needs repairing. The car is repaired at no cost to the customer, with the
bill being paid for by the insurance company of the at-fault parties. The Company is in the process
of integrating Call 24/7 into WNS Assistance, a division of WNS
Global Services (UK) Limited, UK. This
acquisition strengthens the Companys position in accident claims management in the UK, enabling
the Company to leverage its cost-efficient claims processing, technology and engineering and
collision-repair expertise to deliver quality service throughout the accident-management process.
While WNS Assistance focuses on the Fault repairs market, this acquisition leverages the Non
fault repairs business. The results of operations of Call 24/7 have been included in the Companys
consolidated statement of operations from April 1, 2008.
The purchase price for the acquisition was an initial cash payment of GBP 8,425 ($16,767) subject
to post-closing adjustments, plus direct transaction costs of $398 and a contingent earn out of up
to GBP 1,600 ($3,200) based on certain agreed performance metrics for the fiscal year ending March
31, 2009.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, the closing accounts adjustments were completed with
the seller. The purchase consideration was adjusted based on the outcome of these adjustments and
the purchase price was reallocated between the net assets acquired and goodwill recorded. Based on
negotiations with the seller, the contingent earn out consideration is no longer payable. The
revised purchase price for the acquisition was GBP 7,325 ($14,577) plus direct transaction costs of
$398.
8
WNS (HOLDINGS) LIMITED
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
The total estimated cost of the acquisition has been allocated to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based on a preliminary determination of their fair value. The following table
summarizes the revised preliminary allocation:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
3 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
14,795 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
3,341 |
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
526 |
|
Intangible assets customer relationships |
|
|
6,356 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
14,562 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
(22,827 |
) |
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
(1,781 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration |
|
$ |
14,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
During the quarter ended December 31, 2008, the estimates pertaining to valuation of customer
relationship intangible were re-evaluated by the Company. Pursuant to the re-evaluation, the
Company revised the value of the customer relationship intangible to $6,356 as of December 31, 2008
as against as $12,604 as of September 30, 2008. The Company has valued the intangibles for customer
relationships using the income approach by discounting future cash flows and tax amortization
benefit. The intangibles acquired are being amortized over a period of five years.
Business Applications Associates Limited (BizAps)
On June 12, 2008, the Company acquired Business Applications Associates Limited (BizAps), a
provider of systems applications and products (SAP) solutions to optimize enterprise resource
planning (ERP) functionality for finance and accounting processes. The acquisition of BizAps
enables the Company to further assist global customers in transforming shared services finance and
accounting functions, such as purchase-to-pay and order-to-cash. Based in the UK and the US, with
development capability in China, BizAps offers SAP optimization services and SAP certified
solutions designed to simplify SAP roll-out and enhance functionality for internal and outsourced
shared services centers. The results of operations of BizAps have been included in the Companys
consolidated statement of operations from June 1, 2008.
The purchase price for the acquisition was an initial cash payment of GBP 5,000 ($9,749) plus
direct transaction costs of $469. The consideration also includes a contingent earn-out
consideration of up to of GBP 4,500 ($9,000) based on satisfaction of certain performance
obligation over a two-year period as set out in the share purchase agreement.
In July 2008, the Company also issued restricted share units (RSUs) to certain employees of
BizAps with the market value of such RSUs as of the date of grant aggregating GBP 500 ($1,000).
Such issuance of RSUs was accounted for as stock compensation charge on the date of grant.
9
WNS (HOLDINGS) LIMITED
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
The total estimated cost of the acquisition has been allocated to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based on a preliminary determination of their fair value. The following table
summarizes the preliminary allocation:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
182 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
2,405 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
83 |
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
93 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
2,295 |
|
Technology backed assets |
|
|
2,608 |
|
others |
|
|
456 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
3,951 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
(1,306 |
) |
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
(549 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration |
|
$ |
10,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships, technology backed assets and other intangible assets are being amortized
over five years, three years and two years, respectively.
The pro-forma consolidated results of operations assuming the acquisitions of Aviva Global and Call
24/7 occurred at the beginning of the respective periods are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Three months ended |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
As reported |
|
Pro-forma |
|
As reported |
|
Pro-forma |
Revenue |
|
$ |
134,010 |
|
|
$ |
134,010 |
|
|
$ |
115,645 |
|
|
$ |
146,540 |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
2,591 |
|
|
|
2,591 |
|
|
|
7,140 |
|
|
|
3,853 |
|
Net income |
|
|
2,066 |
|
|
|
2,066 |
|
|
|
5,454 |
|
|
|
2,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income per share |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
Diluted income per share |
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
As reported |
|
Pro-forma |
|
As reported |
|
Pro-forma |
Revenue |
|
$ |
406,751 |
|
|
$ |
428,647 |
|
|
$ |
343,746 |
|
|
$ |
436,387 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
7,796 |
|
|
|
5,034 |
|
|
|
7,199 |
|
|
|
(479 |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
5,632 |
|
|
|
3,285 |
|
|
|
3,440 |
|
|
|
(3,210 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income(loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
Diluted income (loss) per share |
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
The unaudited pro forma supplemental information is based on estimates and assumptions, which the
Company believes are reasonable; it is not necessarily indicative of the Companys consolidated
financial position or results of income in future periods or the results that actually would have
been realized had the Company been a combined company during the periods presented. The unaudited
pro forma supplemental information includes incremental intangible asset amortization, adjusted
revenue as per the AVIVA MSA and other charges as a result of the acquisitions, net of the related
tax effects.
10
WNS (HOLDINGS) LIMITED
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
The Company has not disclosed pro forma information for BizAps because the revenue and net income
of BizAps is not material to the revenue and net income of the Company for the three and nine month
periods ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.
3. Stock-based compensation
During the three and nine months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the fair value of stock awards
was estimated at the date of grant using the assumptions as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Expected life (in years) |
|
2 years |
|
3.5 years |
|
2 years |
|
3.5 years |
Risk free interest rate |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
Volatility |
|
|
37.0 |
% |
|
|
30.1 |
% |
|
|
32.7 |
% |
|
|
29.9 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Share-based compensation expense during the three and nine months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Share-based compensation recorded in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue |
|
$ |
893 |
|
|
$ |
594 |
|
|
$ |
2,681 |
|
|
$ |
1,853 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
2,612 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
7,349 |
|
|
|
3,056 |
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation expense |
|
|
3,505 |
|
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
10,030 |
|
|
|
4,909 |
|
Estimated income tax benefit |
|
|
(757 |
) |
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
(2,209 |
) |
|
|
(1,384 |
) |
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense, net of estimated
taxes |
|
$ |
2,748 |
|
|
$ |
1,042 |
|
|
$ |
7,821 |
|
|
$ |
3,525 |
|
|
|
|
4. Joint Venture with ACS
On April 3, 2008, WNS formed a joint venture with Advanced Contact Solutions, Inc (ACS), a
business process outsourcing (BPO) services and customer care provider in the Philippines. This
joint venture is majority owned by WNS (65%) and the balance by ACS and offers contact center
services to global clients across industries. This joint venture enables WNS to bring a large scale
talent pool to help solve the business challenges of its clients while diversifying the geographic
concentration of delivery. It is the intention of both the parties that WNS will acquire the entire
shareholdings of ACS in the joint venture after June 30, 2012. Pursuant to the joint venture agreement,
WNS has irrevocably granted to ACS a put option to sell all of its shareholding in WNS Philippines
to WNS or its designee upon the occurrence of certain conditions, as set forth in the joint venture
agreement. WNS also has a call option from ACS to acquire the remaining shareholding on the same
day on occurrence of certain conditions. The call option need not be
accounted for until the time of actual purchase of shares since that option lies with WNS.
The Company has concluded that the probability of put option getting exercised is low considering the
conditions attached to it and hence as at the balance sheet date the Company has not recorded any
fair value towards the put option. The Company will continue to evaluate the probability of such option being exercised at each balance sheet date. During the quarter ended December 31, 2008, the Company has
recorded a minority interests share of the loss of $180 in its statement of income.
11
WNS (HOLDINGS) LIMITED
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
5. Loss of FMFC as a client
During the three months ended September 30, 2007, one of WNS former clients, First Magnus
Financial Corporation (FMFC), a US mortgage service company, informed WNS that the prevailing
business relationship between the two entities would be terminated with immediate effect from
August 16, 2007 as FMFC had filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the US
Bankruptcy Code. In addition, the US mortgage market continued to be difficult, weak and uncertain
and therefore WNS other mortgage clients also scaled down their existing operations with the
Company. As a result of these indicators of impairment, the Company tested the related goodwill and
intangible assets for impairment and concluded that such goodwill and intangibles acquired in the
purchase of Trinity Partners Inc., of which FMFC was one of the main clients, was impaired. Accordingly,
the Company recorded an impairment charge of $9,106 for the goodwill and $6,359 for the intangibles
in the quarter ended September 30, 2007. The Company also recorded a provision for doubtful account
of $1,398 for accounts receivable from FMFC for services rendered to FMFC through June 2007. In
view of the uncertainty about the collectability of the amounts due for the services rendered to
FMFC after June 30, 2007, the Company did not recognize revenue for service rendered after June 30,
2007 through the date of termination of its contract with FMFC on August 16, 2007. The revenue
earned from this client for the three month period ended June 30, 2007 was approximately $4,188.
The Company filed claims in FMFCs Chapter 11 case for the payment of unpaid invoices for services
rendered to FMFC before FMFC filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, for its entitlement under FMFCs
annual minimum revenue commitment, and for administrative expenses. The amount of outstanding
claims filed totaled $15,600; however, the realizability of these claims cannot be determined at
this time.
6. Comprehensive income
Components of comprehensive income for the three and nine month periods ended December 31, 2008 and
2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Net income |
|
$ |
2,066 |
|
|
$ |
5,454 |
|
|
$ |
5,632 |
|
|
$ |
3,440 |
|
Cumulative translation adjustment |
|
|
(17,237 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(42,962 |
) |
|
|
7,099 |
|
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges |
|
|
15,161 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
Unrecognized actuarial gain (loss) on pension liability |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(66 |
) |
|
$ |
5,380 |
|
|
$ |
(36,924 |
) |
|
$ |
10,518 |
|
|
|
|
7. Capital structure
The following table sets forth the movement of the number of ordinary shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Shares outstanding at the beginning of the period |
|
|
42,569,239 |
|
|
|
42,066,106 |
|
|
|
42,363,100 |
|
|
|
41,842,879 |
|
Shares issued upon exercise of options |
|
|
13,327 |
|
|
|
54,031 |
|
|
|
219,466 |
|
|
|
277,258 |
|
|
|
|
Shares outstanding at the end of the period |
|
|
42,582,566 |
|
|
|
42,120,137 |
|
|
|
42,582,566 |
|
|
|
42,120,137 |
|
|
|
|
12
WNS (HOLDINGS) LIMITED
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
8. Income per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,066 |
|
|
$ |
5,454 |
|
|
$ |
5,632 |
|
|
$ |
3,440 |
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted
average
ordinary shares
outstanding |
|
|
42,572,600 |
|
|
|
42,080,794 |
|
|
|
42,497,209 |
|
|
|
41,987,723 |
|
Dilutive impact
of equivalent
stock options
outstanding |
|
|
380,982 |
|
|
|
826,894 |
|
|
|
716,727 |
|
|
|
989,555 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted
weighted
average
ordinary shares
outstanding |
|
|
42,953,582 |
|
|
|
42,907,688 |
|
|
|
43,213,936 |
|
|
|
42,977,278 |
|
|
|
|
The Company computes net income per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share.
The computation of net income per ordinary share was determined by dividing net income by the
weighted average ordinary shares outstanding during the respective periods.
9. Retirement benefits
Defined Contribution Plan
The following table sets forth the Companys contribution to defined contribution plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Provident fund India |
|
$ |
1,293 |
|
|
$ |
1,330 |
|
|
$ |
4,099 |
|
|
$ |
3,770 |
|
Pension scheme UK |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
401(k) Plan US |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,532 |
|
|
$ |
1,606 |
|
|
$ |
4,974 |
|
|
$ |
4,561 |
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit plan gratuity
The following table sets forth the net periodic cost recognized by the Company in respect of
gratuity payments under the Companys gratuity plans covering eligible employees of the Company in
India and Sri Lanka.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Net periodic gratuity cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
139 |
|
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
$ |
586 |
|
|
$ |
344 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Expected return on plan asset |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
Net periodic gratuity cost for the period |
|
$ |
222 |
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
875 |
|
|
$ |
411 |
|
|
|
|
13
WNS (HOLDINGS) LIMITED
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
10. Segments
The Company has several operating segments including travel, insurance, auto claims (WNS Assistance
and Call 24/7) and others. The Company believes that the business process outsourcing services that
it provides to customers in industries other than auto-claims such as travel, insurance and others
are similar in terms of services, service delivery methods, use of technology, and long-term gross
profit and hence meet the aggregation criteria under SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of
an Enterprise and Related Information (SFAS No. 131). However, WNS Assistance and Call 24/7
(WNS Auto Claims BPO), which provide automobile claims handling services, do not meet the
aggregation criteria under SFAS No. 131. Accordingly, the Company has determined that it has two
reportable segments WNS Global BPO and WNS Auto Claims BPO.
In order to provide accident management services, the Company arranges for the repair through a
network of repair centers. Repair costs paid to automobile repair centers are invoiced to customers
and recognized as revenue. The Company uses revenue less repair payments for Fault repairs as a
primary measure to allocate resources and measure segment performance. Revenue less repair payments
is a non-GAAP measure which is calculated as revenue less payments to repair centers. For Non
fault repairs, revenue including repair payments is used as a primary measure. As the Company
provides a consolidated suite of accident management services including credit hire and credit
repair for its Non fault repairs business, the Company believes that measurement of that line of
business has to be on a basis that includes repair payments in revenue. The Company believes that
the presentation of this non-GAAP measure in the segmental information provides useful information
for investors regarding the segments financial performance. The presentation of this non-GAAP
information is not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the Companys
financial results prepared in accordance with US GAAP.
Segmental information for the three and nine month periods ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended December 31, 2008 |
|
|
WNS Global |
|
WNS Auto |
|
Inter |
|
|
|
|
BPO |
|
Claims BPO |
|
Segments |
|
Total |
Revenue from external customers |
|
$ |
84,263 |
|
|
$ |
49,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
134,010 |
|
|
|
|
Segmental revenue |
|
$ |
84,423 |
|
|
$ |
49,747 |
|
|
$ |
(160 |
) |
|
$ |
134,010 |
|
Payments to repair centers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,404 |
|
|
|
|
Revenue less repair payments |
|
|
84,423 |
|
|
|
15,343 |
|
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
99,606 |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
5,110 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,278 |
|
Other costs |
|
|
61,936 |
|
|
|
10,969 |
|
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
72,746 |
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income |
|
|
17,376 |
|
|
|
4,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,582 |
|
Unallocated share-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,505 |
) |
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,419 |
) |
Other (expenses), net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,113 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,955 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,591 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(705 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditure |
|
$ |
10,095 |
|
|
|
1,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,221 |
|
|
|
|
Segment assets, net of eliminations as at
December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
451,537 |
|
|
$ |
83,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
535,235 |
|
|
|
|
14
WNS (HOLDINGS) LIMITED
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
WNS Global |
|
WNS Auto |
|
Inter |
|
|
|
|
BPO |
|
Claims BPO |
|
Segments |
|
Total |
Revenue from external customers |
|
$ |
65,242 |
|
|
$ |
50,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
115,645 |
|
|
|
|
Segmental revenue |
|
$ |
65,517 |
|
|
$ |
50,403 |
|
|
$ |
(275 |
) |
|
$ |
115,645 |
|
Payments to repair centers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,589 |
|
|
|
|
Revenue less repair payments |
|
|
65,517 |
|
|
|
8,814 |
|
|
|
(275 |
) |
|
|
74,056 |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
4,404 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,522 |
|
Other costs |
|
|
58,242 |
|
|
|
4,075 |
|
|
|
(275 |
) |
|
|
62,042 |
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income |
|
|
2,871 |
|
|
|
4,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,492 |
|
Unallocated share-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,486 |
) |
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(897 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,052 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,140 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,686 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditure |
|
$ |
7,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,386 |
|
|
|
|
Segment assets, net of eliminations as at
December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
232,691 |
|
|
$ |
81,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
314,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended December 31, 2008 |
|
|
WNS Global |
|
WNS Auto |
|
Inter |
|
|
|
|
BPO |
|
Claims BPO |
|
Segments |
|
Total |
Revenue from external customers |
|
$ |
240,896 |
|
|
$ |
165,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
406,751 |
|
|
|
|
Segmental revenue |
|
$ |
241,454 |
|
|
$ |
165,855 |
|
|
$ |
(559 |
) |
|
$ |
406,751 |
|
Payments to repair centers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,920 |
|
|
|
|
Revenue less repair payments |
|
|
241,454 |
|
|
|
49,935 |
|
|
|
(559 |
) |
|
|
290,831 |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
15,108 |
|
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,782 |
|
Other costs |
|
|
191,032 |
|
|
|
36,627 |
|
|
|
(559 |
) |
|
|
227,100 |
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income |
|
|
35,315 |
|
|
|
12,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,949 |
|
Unallocated share-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,030 |
) |
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,900 |
) |
Other (expenses), net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,901 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,322 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,796 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,344 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,632 |
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditure |
|
$ |
15,631 |
|
|
$ |
1,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,800 |
|
|
|
|
15
WNS (HOLDINGS) LIMITED
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
WNS Global |
|
WNS Auto |
|
Inter |
|
|
|
|
BPO |
|
Claims BPO |
|
Segments |
|
Total |
Revenue from external customers |
|
$ |
192,703 |
|
|
$ |
151,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
343,746 |
|
|
|
|
Segmental revenue |
|
$ |
193,460 |
|
|
$ |
151,043 |
|
|
$ |
(757 |
) |
|
$ |
343,746 |
|
Payments to repair centers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,182 |
|
|
|
|
Revenue less repair payments |
|
|
193,460 |
|
|
|
22,861 |
|
|
|
(757 |
) |
|
|
215,564 |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
12,327 |
|
|
|
1,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,393 |
|
Other costs |
|
|
169,039 |
|
|
|
11,052 |
|
|
|
(757 |
) |
|
|
179,334 |
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income |
|
|
12,094 |
|
|
|
10,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,837 |
|
Unallocated share-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,909 |
) |
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,205 |
) |
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,464 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,963 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,199 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,759 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditure |
|
$ |
19,886 |
|
|
$ |
1,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,725 |
|
|
|
|
11. Other income (expenses), net
Components of other income for the three and nine month periods ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Interest income |
|
$ |
427 |
|
|
$ |
1,392 |
|
|
$ |
1,617 |
|
|
$ |
3,890 |
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss), net |
|
|
(4,885 |
) |
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
(8,133 |
) |
|
|
2,378 |
|
Other income |
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4,113 |
) |
|
$ |
2,052 |
|
|
$ |
(5,901 |
) |
|
$ |
6,963 |
|
|
|
|
12. Fair value measurement
Effective
April 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No.
157) except as it
applies to the non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities
subject to FASB Staff
Position (FSP) FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB
Statement No. 157 (FSP FAS
157-2) (see
Note 15 below). SFAS No. 157 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount
that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants. The adoption of this standard did not
have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
The fair value is a market-based measurement that should be
determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a
liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, SFAS No. 157 establishes a three-tier value
hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair
value:
Level 1 Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or
liabilities in active markets.
Level 2 Includes other inputs that are directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity.
16
WNS (HOLDINGS) LIMITED
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
The fair value hierarchy also requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and
minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. In accordance with SFAS No. 157,
the Company measures cash equivalents, marketable securities and foreign currency derivative
contracts at fair value. Cash equivalents and marketable securities are primarily classified within
Level 1 or Level 2. This is because the cash equivalents and marketable securities are valued
primarily using quoted market prices or alternative pricing sources and models utilizing market
observable inputs. The foreign currency derivative contracts are classified within Level 2 as the
valuation inputs are based on quoted prices and market observable data of similar instruments in
inactive markets.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value measurement at reporting date using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
Other |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical |
|
Observable |
|
Unobservable |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Assets |
|
Inputs |
|
Inputs |
Description |
|
2008 |
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency derivative contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
current |
|
$ |
10,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
non current |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
10,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding foreign currency
derivative contracts non current |
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest swap liability non current |
|
|
10,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
11,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
Effective April 1, 2008, the Company also adopted SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115,
which allows an entity to choose to measure certain financial instruments and liabilities at fair
value on a contract-by-contract basis. Subsequent fair value measurement for the financial
instruments and liabilities an entity chooses to measure will be recognized in earnings. As of
April 1, 2008, the Company did not elect such an option for
financial instruments and liabilities as they were not material.
13. Term loan with ICICI Bank
On July 10, 2008, the Company entered into a facility agreement with ICICI Bank UK Plc as agent and
ICICI Bank UK Plc and ICICI Bank Canada as arrangers and leaders. The facility agreement provides
for a secured term loan of $200,000 to WNS (Mauritius) Limited to finance the transaction with
AVIVA described in Note 2 above. The arrangers have since syndicated part of the loan to The Hong
Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation and DBS Bank Limited. The term loan bears interest initially
at a rate equivalent to the three month US dollar LIBOR plus 3% per annum. However, this interest
rate was subject to change as the Company had agreed that the arrangers for the term loan have the
right at any time prior to the completion of the syndication of the term loan to change the pricing
of the term loan if any such arranger determined that such change was necessary to ensure a
successful syndication of the term loan. On November 12, 2008, the arrangers for the term loan and
the Company reached an in-principle agreement to close the syndication of the term loan with an
increase in the interest rate on the term loan by 0.5% per
annum effective November 10, 2008. The issuance of the syndication closure letter on these terms is
subject to the formal approval process of the arrangers. Interest on the term loan is payable on a
quarterly basis. The amount drawn down under this facility as at December 31, 2008 was $200,000.
The loan is repayable in eight semi-annual installments with the first installment falling due on
July 10, 2009. The term loan is guaranteed by the Company and certain of its subsidiaries and
collateralized by certain of the Companys assets.
17
WNS (HOLDINGS) LIMITED
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
The facility agreement requires the Company to maintain the following financial covenants: (i) the
ratio of total borrowings to tangible net worth (as defined in the facility agreement) shall not
exceed 2 to 1, (ii) the ratio of total borrowings to adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the facility
agreement) shall not exceed 2.5 to 1, (iii) the ratio of adjusted EBITDA to debt service shall not
be less than 1.3 to 1, and (iv) the ratio of the aggregate outstanding under the facility to the
value of the purchased business shall not be more than 100% at any time.
The summary of the term loan as at December 31, 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2008 |
|
Current portion |
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
Long term position |
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid during the three and nine months ended December 31, 2008 was $2,959 and accrued
interest at December 31, 2008 is $3,614.
The aggregate amount of the term loan to be repaid as of the dates indicated below is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
For fiscal year ending March 31 |
|
$ |
2009 |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
40,000 |
|
2011 |
|
|
40,000 |
|
2012 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
2013 |
|
|
70,000 |
|
The Company incurred $1,891 as debt issuance costs, which is being amortized over the term of the
loan using the effective interest method. As at December 31, 2008, the unamortized debt issuance
costs was $1,617. The same is classified under other current assets in the financial statements.
In connection with the term loan, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements with ICICI
Bank Limited and DBS Bank Limited. The swap agreements aggregate $200,000 in notional principal
amount. These swap agreements effectively convert the term loan of $200,000 from variable interest
rate to fixed rate. The Company thereby manages its exposure to changes in market interest rates
under the term loan. The Companys use of derivative instruments is limited to effective fixed and
floating interest rate swap agreements used to manage well-defined interest rate risk exposures.
The Company monitors its positions and does not anticipate non-performance by the counterparties.
The Company does not enter into interest rate swap agreements for trading and speculative purposes.
The swap agreements require the Company to make fixed interest payments based on an average rate of
3.80% and receive variable interest payments
from its counterparties based on the three month US dollar LIBOR rate. The remaining term of these
swap agreements is 4 years. During the three months ended December 31, 2008, the Company recorded a
net change in the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements amounting to $8,386 in other
comprehensive income. The net additional interest payments made or received under these swap
agreements are recognized in interest expense.
14. Short-term line of credit
Short-term line of credit includes an amount of GBP 3,825 ($5,511) outstanding under an overdraft
and bill discounting facility available to Call 24/7 from Clydesdale Bank, Plc. The limits for the
overdraft and invoice discounting facility are GBP 300 ($440) and GBP 4,000 ($5,800), respectively.
The overdraft facility is secured by a charge over the accounts
receivables of Call 24/7, guarantees provided by Call 24/7 and WNS
Global Services (UK) Limited and a fixed and floating charge over the Companys assets. In the
quarter ended December 31, 2008, the Company repaid in full a short term loan made available in the
preceding quarter by HDFC Limited, which is a related party.
18
WNS (HOLDINGS) LIMITED
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
15. Recent accounting pronouncements
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised),
Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141(R)). The standard
changes the way companies account for business combinations and requires the acquiring entity in a
business combination to recognize assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction;
establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired
and liabilities assumed; and requires the acquirer to disclose information needed by investors to
understand the nature and financial effect of the business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. The
Company will adopt SFAS No. 141(R) beginning April 1, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin
No. 51 (SFAS No. 160). This statement requires an
entity to classify noncontrolling financial interests in subsidiaries as a separate component of
equity. Additionally, transactions between an entity and noncontrolling interests are required to
be treated as equity transactions. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 160 beginning
April 1, 2009. The Company currently does not have a noncontrolling interest.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 which
defers the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities,
except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a
recurring basis (at least annually) to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim
periods within those fiscal years for items within the scope of this FSP. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 157 on non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, but
does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 157 to have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 133 (SFAS No. 161). This Statement changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and
hedging activities. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an
entity uses
derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for
under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related
hedged items affect an entitys financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. This
standard is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008 with early adoption permitted. The Company will adopt SFAS No.
161 with the interim period beginning January 1, 2009 and is currently evaluating its impact on its
consolidated financial statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (SFAS No. 162). SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for
selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements that are presented in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. SFAS No. 162 becomes effective 60 days
following the SECs approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU
Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles. The Company does not expect that the adoption of SFAS No. 162 will have a material
impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets. FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in
developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets . The Company is
required to adopt FSP No. FAS 142-3 for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company
is evaluating the impact that the adoption of FSP No. FAS 142-3 will have on its consolidated
financial statements.
19
Part II MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this report. We urge you to
carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report and in our other
SEC filings, including our annual report on Form 20-F for our fiscal year ended March 31, 2008.
Some of the statements in the following discussion are forward-looking statements. See Special
note regarding forward-looking statements.
Overview
We are a leading provider of offshore business process outsourcing, or BPO, services. We provide
comprehensive data, voice and analytical services to our clients, which are typically companies
located in Europe and North America.
Although we typically enter into long-term contractual arrangements with our clients, these
contracts can usually be terminated with or without cause by our clients and often with short
notice periods. Nevertheless, our client relationships tend to be long-term in nature given the
scale and complexity of the services we provide coupled with risks and costs associated with
switching processes in-house or to other service providers. We structure each contract to meet our
clients specific business requirements and our target rate of return over the life of the
contract. In addition, since the sales cycle for offshore business process outsourcing is long and
complex, it is often difficult to predict the timing of new client engagements. As a result, we may
experience fluctuations in growth rates and profitability from quarter to quarter, depending on the
timing and nature of new contracts. Our focus, however, is on deepening our client relationships
and maximizing shareholder value over the life of a clients relationship with us.
Our revenue is generated primarily from providing business process outsourcing services. We have
two reportable segments for financial statement reporting purposes WNS Global BPO and WNS Auto
Claims BPO. In our WNS Auto Claims BPO segment, we provide both Fault and Non fault repairs.
For Fault repairs, we provide claims handling and accident management services, where we arrange
for automobile repairs through a network of third party repair centers. In our accident management
services, we act as the principal in our dealings with the third party repair centers and our
clients. The amounts we invoice to our clients for payments made by us to third party repair
centers is reported as revenue. Since we wholly subcontract the repairs to the repair centers, we
evaluate our financial performance based on revenue less repair payments to third party repair
centers which is a non-GAAP measure. We believe that revenue less repair payments for Fault
repairs reflects more accurately the value addition of the business process outsourcing services
that we directly provide to our clients, For Non fault repairs, revenue including repair payments
is used as a primary measure. As we provide a consolidated suite of accident management services
including credit hire and credit repair for our Non fault repairs business, we believe that
measurement of that line of business has to be on a basis that includes repair payments in
revenues. The presentation of this non-GAAP information is not meant to be considered in isolation
or as a substitute for our financial results prepared in accordance with US GAAP. Revenue less
repair payments is a non-GAAP measure which is calculated as revenue less payments to repair
centers. Our revenue less repair payments may not be comparable to similarly titled measures
reported by other companies due to potential differences in the method of calculation.
The following table reconciles our revenue (a GAAP measure) to revenue less repair payments (a
non-GAAP measure):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended December 31, |
|
|
Nine months ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(US dollars in millions) |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
134.0 |
|
|
$ |
115.6 |
|
|
$ |
406.8 |
|
|
$ |
343.7 |
|
Less: Payments to repair centers |
|
|
34.4 |
|
|
|
41.5 |
|
|
|
115.9 |
|
|
|
128.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue less repair payments |
|
$ |
99.6 |
|
|
$ |
74.1 |
|
|
$ |
290.8 |
|
|
$ |
215.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
Recent Developments
Global Market and Economic Conditions
In the United States, Europe and Asia, recent market and economic conditions have been
unprecedented and challenging with tighter credit conditions and slower growth through the quarter
ended December 31, 2008. For the nine months ended December 31, 2008, continued concerns about the
systemic impact of inflation, energy costs, geopolitical issues, the availability and cost of
credit, the mortgage market and a declining real estate market have contributed to increased market
volatility and diminished expectations for the economy globally. These conditions, combined with
volatile oil prices, declining business and consumer confidence and increased unemployment have, in
the third quarter of fiscal 2009, contributed to volatility of unprecedented levels.
These economic conditions may affect our business in a number of ways. The general level of
economic activity, such as decreases in business and consumer spending, could result in a decrease
in demand for our services, thus reducing our revenue. The cost and availability of credit has been
and may continue to be adversely affected by illiquid credit markets and wider credit spreads.
Continued turbulence in the US and international markets and economies may adversely affect our
liquidity and financial condition, and the liquidity and financial condition of our customers. If
these market conditions continue, they may limit our ability to access financing or increase our
cost of financing to meet liquidity needs, and affect the ability of our customers to use credit to
purchase our services or to make timely payments to us, resulting in adverse effects on our
financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, weakening of the rate of exchange for
the US dollar or the pound sterling (in which our revenue is principally denominated) against the
Indian rupee (in which a significant portion of our costs are denominated) also adversely affects
our results. Uncertainty about current global economic conditions could also continue to increase
the volatility of our share price. We cannot predict the timing or duration of the economic
slowdown or the timing or strength of a subsequent economic recovery generally or in our targeted
industries, including the travel and insurance industry. If macroeconomic conditions worsen, we are
not able to predict the impact such worsening conditions will have on our targeted industries in
general, and our results of operations specifically.
AVIVA Transaction
In July 2008, we entered into a transaction with AVIVA International Holdings Limited, or AVIVA,
consisting of a share sale and purchase agreement with AVIVA and a master services agreement with
AVIVA Global Services (Management Services) Private Limited, or AVIVA MS.
Pursuant to the share sale and purchase agreement with AVIVA, we acquired all the shares of Aviva
Global Services Singapore Private Limited, or Aviva Global, in July 2008. Aviva Global was the
business process offshoring subsidiary of AVIVA with facilities in Bangalore, India, and Colombo,
Sri Lanka. Since 2004, we have provided BPO services to AVIVA pursuant to build-operate-transfer,
or BOT, contracts from facilities in Pune, India, and Colombo, Sri Lanka. The Sri Lanka facility
was transferred to Aviva Global in July 2007. With our acquisition of Aviva Global, we have resumed
control of this Sri Lanka facility as well as acquired Aviva Globals Bangalore facilities. The
Pune facility has remained with us. In addition, there are two facilities in Chennai and Pune,
India, which were operated by third party BPO providers for Aviva Global under similar BOT
contracts. Aviva Global has exercised its option to require the third party BPO providers to
transfer these facilities to Aviva Global. The completion of the transfers of the Chennai and Pune
facilities to Aviva Global occurred in July and August 2008, respectively.
Pursuant to the master services agreement with AVIVA MS, or the AVIVA master services agreement, we
have agreed to provide BPO services to AVIVAs UK and Canadian businesses for a term of eight years
and four months. Under the terms of the agreement, we have agreed to provide a comprehensive
spectrum
of life and general insurance processing functions to AVIVA, including policy administration and
settlement, along with finance and accounting, customer care and other support services. In
addition, we have the exclusive right to provide certain services such as finance and accounting,
insurance back-office, customer interaction and analytics services to AVIVAs UK and Canadian
businesses for the first five years, subject to the rights and obligations of the AVIVA group under
their existing contracts with other providers. As part of the agreement, we also expect to benefit
from Aviva Globals contract with AVIVAs Irish subsidiary, Hibernian.
21
The purchase price paid to AVIVA for the AVIVA transaction was £112.4 million ($225.2 million based
on the exchange rate on July 11, 2008), subject to adjustments for cash, debt and the net asset
values of the companies holding the Chennai and Pune facilities as of their transfer dates to Aviva
Global on July 21, 2008 and August 10, 2008, respectively. In addition, we paid for the
acquisitions of the companies holding the Chennai and Pune facilities at the net purchase price of
£6.9 million ($13.9 million based on the exchange rate on July 21, 2008) and £1.9 million ($3.7
million based on the exchange rate on August 10, 2008), respectively, subject to closing accounts
adjustments as of the respective transfer dates to Aviva Global. Legal and professional fees
pertaining to this transaction aggregating to approximately $8.2 million have also been considered
as part of the acquisition cost. Thus, the total consideration for the AVIVA transaction was $251
million, subject to closing accounts adjustments.
On July 10, 2008, we entered into a secured 4.5 year term loan facility of $200 million with ICICI
Bank UK Plc as agent, and ICICI Bank UK Plc and ICICI Bank Canada as arrangers and lenders to
finance our transaction with AVIVA. We drew down the full amount of $200 million under the facility
in July 2008. The arrangers have since syndicated part of the loan to The Hongkong and Shanghai
Banking Corporation and DBS Bank Limited. Interest on the term loan is payable on a quarterly
basis. Interest on the term loan was initially agreed at a rate equivalent to the three month US
dollar LIBOR plus 3% per annum, subject to change by the arrangers for the term loan at any time
prior to the completion of the syndication of the term loan if any such arranger determined that
such change was necessary to ensure a successful syndication of the term loan. On November 12,
2008, the arrangers for the term loan and we reached an in-principle agreement to close the
syndication of the term loan with an increase in the interest rate on the term loan by 0.5% per
annum effective November 10, 2008. The issuance of the syndication closure letter on these terms is
subject to the formal approval process of the arrangers. In connection with the term loan, we have
entered into interest rate swap agreements with banks to swap the variable portion of the interest
based on US dollar LIBOR to an average rate of 3.80% per annum. After giving effect to the interest
rate swap agreements, we are incurring an interest rate of 7.3% per annum on the term loan. The
amount drawn down under this facility as of December 31, 2008 was $200 million. The loan is
repayable in eight semi-annual installments with the first installment falling due on July 10,
2009.
Under the facility agreement, we are required to maintain the following financial covenants:
(i) the ratio of total borrowings to tangible net worth (as defined in the facility agreement) shall not exceed 2 to 1, (ii) the ratio of total borrowings
to adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the facility agreement) shall not exceed 2.5 to 1, (iii) the ratio of adjusted EBITDA to debt service shall not be less than 1.3 to 1,
and (iv) the ratio of the aggregate amount outstanding under the facility to the value of Aviva Global shall not be more than 100% at any time.
The facility is secured by, among other things, guarantees provided by us and certain of our
subsidiaries, namely, WNS Capital Investment Limited, WNS Global Services (UK) Limited, or WNS UK,
and WNS North America Inc., a fixed and floating charge over the assets of WNS UK, share pledges
over WNS Capital Investment Limited, WNS UK, WNS North America Inc. and WNS (Mauritius) Limited,
and charges over certain bank accounts.
Revenue
We generate revenue by providing business process outsourcing services to our clients. For the
three months ended December 31, 2008, our revenue was $134.0 million as compared to $115.6 million
for the three months ended December 31, 2007, representing an increase of 15.9%. Our revenue less
repair payments was $99.6 million for the three months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to $74.1
million for the three months ended December 31, 2007, representing an increase of 34.5%.
For the nine months ended December 31, 2008, our revenue was $406.8 million as compared to $343.7
million for the nine months ended December 31, 2007, representing an increase of 18.3%. Our revenue
less repair payments was $290.8 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to
$215.6 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2007, representing an increase of 34.9%. We
have been successful in adding new clients who are diversified across industries and geographies to
our existing large client base.
22
Our Contracts
We provide our services under contracts with our clients, the majority of which have terms ranging
between three and five years, with some being rolling contracts with no end dates. Typically, these
contracts can be terminated by our clients with or without cause and with notice periods ranging
from three to six months. However, we tend to have long-term relationships with our clients given
the complex and comprehensive nature of the business processes executed by us, coupled with the
switching costs and risks associated with relocating these processes in-house or to other service
providers.
Our clients customarily provide one to three month rolling forecasts of their service requirements.
Our contracts with our clients do not generally provide for a committed minimum volume of business
or committed amounts of revenues, except for our contract with one of our top five clients based on
revenue less repair payments in fiscal 2008, and the AVIVA master services agreement that we
entered into in July 2008 as described under Recent Developments AVIVA Transaction above.
Under the terms of our agreement with one of our top five clients, the annual forecasted revenue to
be provided to us for calendar years 2009 and 2010 amounts to $39.9 million and $41.1 million, respectively. In the event actual revenue provided to us in any year is less
than 75% of the annual forecasted revenue for that year, or the Annual Minimum Revenue Commitment,
the client has agreed to pay us 65% of the difference between the Annual Minimum Revenue Commitment
and the actual revenue provided for that year after certain deductions. However, notwithstanding
these minimum revenue commitments, there are also termination at will provisions which permit the
client to terminate the individual statements of work without cause with 180 days notice upon
payment of a termination fee. These termination provisions dilute the impact of the minimum revenue
commitment. In the case of the AVIVA master services agreement, AVIVA MS has agreed to provide a
minimum volume of business, or Minimum Volume Commitment, to us during the term of the contract.
The Minimum Volume Commitment is calculated as 3,000 billable full-time employees, where one
billable full time employee is the equivalent of a production employee engaged by us to perform our
obligations under the contract for one working day of at least nine hours for 250 days a year. In
the event the mean average monthly volume of business in any rolling three month period does not
reach the Minimum Volume Commitment, AVIVA MS has agreed to pay us a minimum commitment fee as
liquidated damages. Notwithstanding the Minimum Volume Commitment, there are termination at will
provisions which permit AVIVA MS to terminate the AVIVA master services agreement without cause at
any time after the expiry of 24 months from October 9, 2008, except in the case of the Chennai
facility which was transferred to Aviva Global in July 2008, at any time after expiry of 24 months
from September 19, 2008, and in the case of the Pune facility which was transferred to Aviva Global
in August 2008, at any time after expiry of 24 months from October 10, 2008, in each case, with six
months notice upon payment of a termination fee. Under the terms of the AVIVA master services
agreement, we are also granted an exclusive right to provide certain services such as finance and
accounting, insurance back-office, customer interaction and analytics services to AVIVAs UK and
Canadian businesses for the first five years, subject to the rights and obligations of the AVIVA
group under their existing contracts with other providers.
Each client contract has different terms and conditions based on the scope of services to be
delivered and the requirements of that client. Occasionally, we may incur significant costs on
certain contracts in the early stages of implementation, with the expectation that these costs will
be recouped over the life of the contract to achieve our targeted returns. Each client contract has
corresponding service level agreements that define certain operational metrics based on which our
performance is measured. Some of our contracts specify penalties or damages payable by us in the
event of failure to meet certain key service level standards within an agreed upon time frame.
When we are engaged by a client, we typically transfer that clients processes to our delivery
centers over a two to six month period. This transfer process is subject to a number of potential
delays. Therefore, we may not recognize significant revenue until several months after commencing a
client engagement.
23
In the WNS Global BPO segment, we charge for our services primarily based on three pricing models
per full-time equivalent; per transaction; or cost-plus as follows:
|
|
|
per full-time equivalent arrangements typically involve billings based on the number
of full-time employees (or equivalent) deployed on the execution of the business process
outsourced; |
|
|
|
|
per transaction arrangements typically involve billings based on the number of
transactions processed (such as the number of e-mail responses, or airline coupons or
insurance claims processed); or |
|
|
|
|
cost-plus arrangements typically involve billing the contractually agreed direct and
indirect costs and a fee based on the number of employees deployed under the
arrangement. |
In July 2006, we entered into a definitive contract with British Airways to replace the prior
contract. The new contract will expire in May 2012. Under the new contract the parties have agreed
to change the basis of pricing for a portion of the contracted services over a transition period
from a per full time equivalent basis to a per unit transaction basis. This change has had the
effect of reducing the amount of revenue that we receive under this contract for the same level of
services. The change to a per unit transaction price basis allows us to share benefits from
increases in efficiency in performing services under this contract. In fiscal 2008, this change in
the basis of pricing resulted in a decrease in the amount of revenue that we received under this
contract for the same level of services provided by us but an increase in profitability due to
increases in efficiency.
Our prior contracts with another major client, AVIVA, granted Aviva Global, which was AVIVAs
business process offshoring subsidiary, the option to require us to transfer our facilities at Sri
Lanka and Pune to Aviva Global. On January 1, 2007, Aviva Global exercised its call option
requiring us to transfer the Sri Lanka facility to Aviva Global effective July 2, 2007. Effective
July 2, 2007, we transferred the Sri Lanka facility to Aviva Global and we lost the revenues
generated by the Sri Lanka facility. From April 1, 2007 through July 2, 2007, the Sri Lanka
facility contributed $2.0 million of revenue and for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006,
the Sri Lanka facility accounted for 1.8% and 2.7% of our revenue, respectively, and 2.8% and 3.1%
of our revenue less repair payments, respectively. In fiscal 2007 and 2006, the Sri Lanka facility
accounted for 1.9% and 3.3% of our revenue, respectively, and 3.0% and 4.5% of our revenue less
repair payments, respectively. The Sri Lanka facility was transferred at book value and did not
result in a material gain or loss. With the transaction that we entered into with AVIVA in July
2008 described above, we have, through the acquisition of Aviva Global, resumed control of the Sri
Lanka facility and we have continued to retain ownership of the Pune facility and we expect these
facilities to continue to generate revenues for us under the AVIVA master services agreement.
However, we may in the future enter into contracts with other clients with similar call options
that may result in the loss of revenue that may have a material impact on our business, results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows, particularly during the quarter in which the option
takes effect.
First Magnus Financial Corporation, or FMFC, a US mortgage lender, was one of our major clients
from November 2005 to August 2007. FMFC was a major client of Trinity Partners Inc., or Trinity
Partners, which we acquired in November 2005 from the First Magnus Group. In August 2007, FMFC
filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code. For fiscal 2007,
FMFC accounted for 4.3% and 6.8% of our revenue and revenue less repair payments, respectively. For
the three months ended June 30, 2007, FMFC accounted for 3.7% of our revenue, and 6.0% of our
revenue less repair payments. Contractually, FMFC was obligated to provide us with annual minimum
revenues, or pay the shortfall, through fiscal 2011. We have filed claims in FMFCs Chapter 11 case
both for the payment of unpaid invoices for services rendered to FMFC before FMFC filed for Chapter
11 bankruptcy, for our entitlement under FMFCs annual minimum revenue commitment, and for
administrative expenses. The amount of outstanding claims filed totaled $15.6 million; however, the
realizability of these claims cannot be determined at this time. We have provided an allowance for
doubtful accounts for the entire amount of accounts receivable from FMFC for fiscal 2008 and 2007.
A small portion of our revenue is comprised of reimbursements of out-of-pocket expenses incurred by
us in providing services to our clients. In our WNS Auto Claims BPO segment, we earn revenue from
claims handling and accident management services. For claims handling, we charge on a per claim
basis or a fixed fee per vehicle over a contract period. For automobile accident management
services, where we arrange for the repairs through a network of repair centers that we have
established, we invoice the client for the amount of the repair. When we direct a vehicle to a
specific repair center, we receive a referral fee from that repair center. We also provide
24
consolidated suite of services towards accident management including credit hire and credit repair
for Non fault repairs business. Overall, we believe that we have established a sustainable
business model which offers revenue visibility over a substantial portion of our business. We have
done so by:
|
|
|
developing a broad client base which has resulted in limited reliance on any
particular client; |
|
|
|
|
seeking to balance our revenue base by targeting industries that offer significant
offshore outsourcing potential: |
|
|
|
|
addressing the largest markets for offshore business process outsourcing services,
which provide geographic diversity across our client base; and |
|
|
|
|
focusing our service mix on diverse data, voice and analytical processes, resulting
in enhanced client retention. |
Expenses
The majority of our expense is comprised of cost of revenue and operating expenses. The key
components of our cost of revenue are payments to repair centers, employee costs and
infrastructure-related costs. Our operating expenses include selling, general and administrative
expenses, or SG&A, and amortization of intangible assets. Our non-operating expenses include
interest expenses, other income and other expenses.
Cost of Revenue
Our WNS Auto Claims BPO segment includes automobile accident management services, where we arrange
for repairs through a network of repair centers. The value of these payments in any given period is
primarily driven by the volume of accidents and the amount of the repair costs related to such
accidents.
Employee costs are also a significant component of cost of revenue. In addition to employee
salaries, employee costs include costs related to recruitment, training and retention.
Our infrastructure costs are comprised of depreciation, lease rentals, facilities management and
telecommunication network cost. Most of our leases for our facilities are long-term agreements and
have escalation clauses which provide for increases in rent at periodic intervals commencing
between three and five years from the start of the lease. Most of these agreements have clauses
that cap escalation of lease rentals.
SG&A Expenses
Our SG&A expenses are primarily comprised of corporate employee costs for sales and marketing,
general and administrative and other support personnel, travel expenses, legal and professional
fees, share-based compensation expense, brand building expenses, and other general expenses not
related to cost of revenue.
Amortization of Intangible Assets
Amortization of intangible assets is associated with our acquisitions of Marketics Technologies
(India) Private Limited, or Marketics, in May 2007, Flovate Technologies Limited, or Flovate, in
June 2007, Call 24/7 Limited, or Call 24/7, in April 2008, Business Applications Associates
Limited, or BizAps, in June 2008 and Aviva Global in July 2008.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net is comprised of interest expenses, interest income and foreign exchange
gains or losses. Interest expense primarily relates to interest charges payable on our secured 4.5
year term loan facility of $200 million taken to finance our transaction with AVIVA and interest
charges arising from our short-term note payable and our line of credit.
25
Operating Data
The following table presents certain operating data as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
Total head count |
|
|
21,328 |
|
|
|
20,966 |
|
|
|
18,053 |
|
|
|
18,104 |
|
|
|
17,812 |
|
Built up seats |
|
|
15,940 |
|
|
|
16,386 |
|
|
|
11,253 |
|
|
|
11,062 |
|
|
|
10,834 |
|
Used seats |
|
|
12,322 |
|
|
|
12,195 |
|
|
|
8,947 |
|
|
|
8,559 |
|
|
|
8,279 |
|
Built up seats refer to the total number of production seats (excluding support functions like
Finance, Human Resource and Administration) that are set up in any premises. Used seats refer to
the number of built up seats that are being used by employees for performing services that are
billed to clients. The remaining seats would be termed vacant seats. The vacant seats would get
converted into used seats when we acquire a new client or increase head count.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain financial information as a percentage of revenue and revenue
less repair payments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue less repair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue less repair |
|
|
Revenue |
|
payments |
|
Revenue |
|
payments |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Cost of revenue |
|
|
72.4 |
% |
|
|
79.4 |
% |
|
|
62.9 |
% |
|
|
67.9 |
% |
|
|
76.3 |
% |
|
|
79.9 |
% |
|
|
66.9 |
% |
|
|
67.9 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
|
27.6 |
% |
|
|
20.6 |
% |
|
|
37.1 |
% |
|
|
32.1 |
% |
|
|
23.7 |
% |
|
|
20.1 |
% |
|
|
33.1 |
% |
|
|
32.1 |
% |
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SG&A |
|
|
14.1 |
% |
|
|
15.4 |
% |
|
|
19.0 |
% |
|
|
24.0 |
% |
|
|
14.4 |
% |
|
|
14.9 |
% |
|
|
20.1 |
% |
|
|
23.8 |
% |
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
Impairment of goodwill and intangible
assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2 |
% |
Operating income |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
(3.1 |
)% |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
(4.1 |
)% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
(1.5 |
)% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
(2.0 |
)% |
|
|
(3.2 |
)% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(3.0 |
)% |
|
|
(0.0 |
)% |
|
|
(4.0 |
)% |
|
|
(0.0 |
)% |
|
|
(1.8 |
)% |
|
|
(0.0 |
)% |
|
|
(2.5 |
)% |
|
|
(0.0 |
)% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(0.5 |
)% |
|
|
(1.5 |
)% |
|
|
(0.7 |
)% |
|
|
(2.3 |
)% |
|
|
(0.6 |
)% |
|
|
(1.1 |
)% |
|
|
(0.8 |
)% |
|
|
(1.7 |
)% |
Net income |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
Minority Interest |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Net income including minority interest |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
The following table reconciles revenue less repair payments to revenue and sets forth payments to
repair centers and revenue less repair payments as a percentage of revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended December 31, |
|
Nine months ended December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(US dollars in millions) |
|
(US dollars in millions) |
Revenue |
|
$ |
134.0 |
|
|
$ |
115.6 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
406.8 |
|
|
$ |
343.7 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
Less: Payments to repair centers |
|
|
34.4 |
|
|
|
41.5 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
115.9 |
|
|
|
128.1 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue less repair payments |
|
$ |
99.6 |
|
|
$ |
74.1 |
|
|
|
74 |
% |
|
|
64 |
% |
|
$ |
290.8 |
|
|
$ |
215.6 |
|
|
|
72 |
% |
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
26
The following table presents our results of operations for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended, |
|
Nine months ended, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(US dollars in millions) |
Revenue |
|
$ |
134.0 |
|
|
$ |
115.6 |
|
|
$ |
406.8 |
|
|
$ |
343.7 |
|
Cost of revenue (note 1) |
|
|
97.0 |
|
|
|
91.8 |
|
|
|
310.4 |
|
|
|
274.5 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
23.8 |
|
|
|
96.3 |
|
|
|
69.2 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SG&A (note 2) |
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
58.4 |
|
|
|
51.2 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
|
|
6.9 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income including minority interest |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
Notes: |
|
(1) |
|
Includes share-based compensation expense of $0.9 million and $2.7 million for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2008,
respectively, and $0.6 million and $1.9 million for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2007, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes share-based compensation expense of $2.6 million and $7.3 million for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2008,
respectively, and $0.9 million and $3.1 million for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2007, respectively. |
Results for Three Months Ended December 31, 2008 Compared to Three Months Ended December 31, 2007
Revenue
Revenue for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 was $134.0 million as compared to $115.6 million
for the quarter ended December 31, 2007, representing an increase of $18.4 million or 15.9%. This
increase in revenue of $18.4 million was attributable to an increase in revenues from new clients
of $16.0 million and an increase in revenues from existing clients of $2.4 million. Of the $18.4
million of increase in revenues, Call 24/7 and BizAps, which we acquired in April 2008 and in June
2008, respectively, contributed $9.1 million and $0.8 million, respectively. Some of the clients of
Call 24/7 and BizAps that contributed to such revenues were existing clients of WNS prior to the
respective acquisitions in April 2008 and June 2008,
respectively, and some were new to WNS. The
increase in revenue from existing clients was primarily attributable to Aviva Global. The increase
in revenue from existing clients was on account of an expansion of the number of processes that we
executed for these clients and an increase in volumes for the existing processes. Revenue from the
UK, Europe (excluding the UK) and North America (primarily the US) accounted for $75.5 million,
$23.8 million and $34.3 million, representing 56.4%, 17.7% and 25.6%, respectively, of our revenue
for the quarter ended December 31, 2008, compared to $56.9 million, $29.5 million and $28.3
million, representing 49.2%, 25.5% and 24.5%, respectively, of our revenue for the quarter ended
December 31, 2007. The increase in revenue from UK was primarily attributable to Aviva Global.
27
Revenue Less Repair Payments
Revenue less repair payments for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 was $99.6 million, an increase
of $25.5 million or 34.5% over our revenue less repair payments of $74.1 million for the quarter
ended December 31, 2007. This increase in revenue less repair payments of $25.5 million was
primarily attributable to an increase in revenue less repair payments from new clients of $14.9
million and an increase in revenues from existing clients of $10.7 million. Of the $25.5 million of
increase in revenue less repair payments, Call 24/7 and BizAps, which we acquired in April 2008 and
June 2008, respectively, contributed $8.8 million and $0.8 million, respectively. Some of the
clients of Call 24/7 and BizAps that contributed to such revenues were existing clients of WNS prior
to the respective acquisitions in April 2008 and June 2008,
respectively, and some were new to WNS.
The increase in revenue less repair payments from existing clients was primarily attributable to
Aviva Global. The increase in revenue less repayment payments from existing clients was on account
of expansion of the number of processes that we executed for these clients and an increase in
volumes for the existing processes. Revenue less repair payments from the UK, Europe (excluding the
UK) and North America (primarily the US) accounted for $58.2 million, $6.7 million and $34.3
million, representing 58.5%, 6.7% and 34.5%, respectively, of our revenue less repair payments for
the quarter ended December 31, 2008, compared to $37.8 million, $7.0 million and $28.3 million,
representing 51.0%, 9.4% and 38.3%, respectively, of our revenue less repair payments for the
quarter ended December 31, 2007. The increase in revenue less repair payments from UK was primarily
attributable to Aviva Global. We realized an increase in revenue less repair payments for the
quarter ended December 31, 2008, in our banking, financial services and insurance, or BFSI, unit,
and, to a lesser extent, in our Emerging Services unit. During the same period we experienced a
decrease in revenue less repair payments in our Travel Services unit and Industrial and
Infrastructure unit.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 was 72.4% of revenue as compared to 79.4%
of revenue for the quarter ended December 31, 2007. Cost of revenue for the quarter ended December
31, 2008 was $97.0 million, an increase of $5.2 million or 5.6% over our cost of revenue of $91.8
million for the quarter ended December 31, 2007. Cost of revenue excluding payments made to repair
centers for our Fault repair services increased by $12.4 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 as compared to the
quarter ended December 31, 2007. Payments made to repair centers decreased by $7.2 million to $34.4
million for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 from $41.6 million for the quarter ended December
31, 2007 mainly due to decreased business from existing clients of WNS Assistance, our auto claims
business. Operating employee compensation increased by $2.8 million due to an increase in headcount
and wages. The increase in head count was primarily attributable to our acquisition of Aviva
Global. Share-based compensation cost included in operating employee compensation increased by $0.3
million for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 as compared to the quarter ended December 31, 2007.
In addition, infrastructure costs increased by $9.2 million mainly on account of payments made to
the repair centers by Call 24/7 for its Non fault repair
services and depreciation cost increased by
$0.5 million mainly due to the opening of new delivery centers
in the Philippines and Romania, and the
acquisition of delivery centers in Pune, Bangalore, Chennai and Sri Lanka in connection with our
acquisition of Aviva Global, in each case in the quarter ended September 30, 2008. The increase was
partially offset by a decrease in travel costs by $0.1 million.
Gross Profit
Gross profit for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 was $37.0 million, or 27.6% of revenue, as
compared to $23.8 million, or 20.6% of revenue, for the quarter ended December 31, 2007. Gross
profit as a percentage of revenue less repair payments was 37.1% for the quarter ended December 31,
2008 compared to 32.1% for the quarter ended December 31, 2007. Gross profit as a percentage of
revenue less repair payments increased by approximately 5.0% for the quarter ended December 31,
2008 as compared to the quarter ended December 31, 2007 primarily on account of an increase in
revenue less repair payments of $25.5 million as discussed above.
28
SG&A Expenses
SG&A expenses for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 were $18.9 million, an increase of $1.1
million or 6.3% over our SG&A expenses of $17.8 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2007.
This increase was primarily on account of (i) an increase in non-operating employee compensation
cost by $3.0 million due to an increase in head count and wages, including an increase in
share-based compensation costs by $1.7 million, and (ii) an increase in facilities costs by $0.5
million due primarily to the setting up of new delivery centers, in
Romania and the Philippines, and
the acquisition of delivery centers in Pune, Bangalore, Chennai and Sri Lanka in connection with
the acquisition of Aviva Global, in each case in the quarter ended September 30, 2008. This
increase was partially offset by (i) a decrease in travel expenses by $1.0 million, (ii) a decrease
in other employee related costs such as recruitment and training costs by $0.6 million, (iii) a
decrease in professional fees by $0.4 million, (iv) a decrease in other administration related
expenses such as communication costs and marketing costs by $0.3 million and (v) a decrease in
the provision for bad debts by $0.1 million. SG&A expenses as a percentage of revenue was 14.1% for
the quarter ended December 31, 2008 as compared to 15.4% for the quarter ended December 31, 2007.
SG&A expenses as a percentage of revenue less repair payments was19.0% for the quarter ended
December 31, 2008 as compared to 24.0% for the quarter ended December 31, 2007.
Amortization of Intangible Assets
Amortization of intangible assets was $7.4 million for the three months ended December 31, 2008, an
increase of $6.5 million over $0.9 million for the three months ended December 31, 2007. The
increase was primarily on account of amortization of intangible assets acquired through our
acquisitions of Call 24/7 in April 2008, BizAps in June 2008 and Aviva Global in July 2008.
Impairment of Goodwill and Intangible Assets
We performed impairment reviews of goodwill and intangible assets when FMFC filed a voluntary
petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code in August 2007, following the
secondary mortgage market crisis. Based on the review, the unamortized balance of goodwill and
intangible assets acquired in connection with the acquisition of Trinity Partners in November 2005
was impaired in August 2007. We had no impairment of goodwill and intangible assets during the
three months ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
Operating Income
Operating income for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 was $10.7 million compared to operating
income of $5.1 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 due to the reasons discussed above.
Operating income as a percentage of revenue was 8.0% for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 as
compared to operating income as a percentage of revenue of 4.4% for the quarter ended December 31,
2007. Operating income as a percentage of revenue less repair payments was 10.7% for the quarter
ended December 31, 2008 as compared to operating income as a percentage of revenue less repair
payments of 6.9% for the quarter ended December 31, 2007.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other expenses, net for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 was $4.1 million as compared to other
income of $2.1 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2007, primarily on account of a decrease
in interest and other income to $0.8 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 from $1.9
million for the quarter ended December 31, 2007, and a foreign exchange loss of $4.9 million for
the quarter ended December 31, 2008 as compared to a foreign exchange gain of $0.2 million for the
quarter ended December 31, 2007.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 was $4.0 million primarily relating to the
term loan taken to fund the AVIVA transaction. No interest expense was incurred for the quarter
ended December 31, 2007.
29
Provision for Income Taxes
Provision for income taxes for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 was $0.7 million, as compared to
$1.7 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2007. The decrease is mainly on account of higher
deferred tax credits in the quarter ended December 31, 2008.
Net Income
Net income for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 was $1.9 million as compared to net income of
$5.5 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2007. Net income as a percentage of revenue was
1.4% for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 as compared to 4.7% for the quarter ended December 31,
2007. Net income as percentage of revenue less repair payments was 1.9% for the quarter ended
December 31, 2008 as compared to 7.4% for the quarter ended December 31, 2007.
Minority Interest
Minority
interest for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 was a benefit
of $0.2 million. This was primarily on
account of loss in the joint venture unit in the Philippines. There was no minority interest for the
quarter ended December 31, 2007.
Net Income after Minority Interest
Net income after minority interest for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 was $2.1 million as
compared to net income after minority interest of $5.5 million for the quarter ended December 31,
2007. Net income after minority interest as a percentage of revenue was 1.5% for the quarter ended
December 31, 2008 as compared to 4.7% for the quarter ended December 31, 2007. Net income after
minority interest as percentage of revenue less repair payments was 2.1% for the quarter ended
December 31, 2008 as compared to 7.4% for the quarter ended December 31, 2007.
Results for the nine Months Ended December 31, 2008 Compared to Nine Months Ended December 31, 2007
Revenue
Revenue for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 was $406.8 million as compared to $343.7
million for the nine months ended December 31, 2007, representing an increase of $63.0 million or
18.3%. This increase in revenue of $63.0 million was primarily attributable to an increase in
revenue from new clients of $42.5 million and, to a lesser extent, an increase in revenue from
existing clients of $20.5 million. Of the $63.0 million of increase in revenues, Call 24/7 and
BizAps, which we acquired in April 2008 and in June 2008, respectively, contributed $29.0 million
and $2.2 million in revenue, respectively. Some of the clients of Call 24/7 and BizAps that
contributed to such revenues were existing clients of WNS prior to the respective acquisitions in
April 2008 and June 2008, respectively, and some were new to WNS. The increase in revenue from
existing clients was primarily attributable to Aviva Global. The increase in revenue from existing
clients was on account of expansion of the number of processes that we executed for these clients
and an increase in volumes for the existing processes. Revenue from the UK, Europe (excluding the
UK) and North America (primarily the US) accounted for $223.1 million, $83.3 million and $98.9
million, representing 54.8%, 20.5% and 24.3% respectively, of our revenue for the nine months ended
December 31, 2008, compared to $170.8 million, $87.5 million and $83.3 million, representing 49.7%,
25.5% and 24.2%, respectively, of our revenue for the nine months ended December 31, 2007. The
increase in revenue from UK was primarily attributable to Aviva Global.
30
Revenue Less Repair Payments
Revenue less repair payments for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 was $290.8 million, an
increase of $75.3 million or 34.9% over our revenue less repair payments of $215.6 million for the
nine months ended December 31, 2007. This increase in revenue less repair payments of $75.3 million
was attributable to an increase in revenues less repair payments from new clients of $40.6 million
and an increase in revenue less repair payments from existing clients of $34.7 million. Of the
$75.3 million of increase in revenue less repair payments, Call 24/7 and BizAps which we acquired
in April 2008 and June 2008, respectively, contributed $28.5 million and $2.2 million in revenue
less repair payments, respectively. Some of the clients of Call 24/7 and BizAps that contributed to
such revenues were existing clients of WNS prior to the respective acquisition in April 2008 and
June 2008, respectively, and some were new to WNS. The increase in revenue less repair payments
from existing clients was primarily attributable to Aviva Global. The increase in revenue less
repair payments from existing clients on account of expansion of the number of processes that we
executed for these clients and an increase in volumes for the existing processes. Revenue less
repair payments from the UK, Europe (excluding the UK) and North America (primarily the US)
accounted for $168.4 million, $22.1 million and $98.9 million, respectively, of our revenue less
repair payments for the nine months ended December 31, 2008, representing 57.9%, 7.6% and 34.0%,
respectively, of our revenue less repair payments for the nine months ended December 31, 2008
compared to $109.7 million, $20.5 million and $83.3 million, representing 50.9%, 9.5% and 38.6%,
respectively, of our revenue less repair payments for the nine months ended December 31, 2007. The
increase in revenue less repair payments from UK was primarily attributable to Aviva Global. We
realized an increase in revenue less repair payments for the nine months ended December 31, 2008,
in our BFSI unit, and, to a lesser extent, in our Emerging Services unit and Travel Service unit.
During the same period we experienced a decrease in revenue less repair payments in our Industrial
and Infrastructure unit.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 was 76.3% of revenue as compared to
79.9% of revenue for the nine months ended December 31, 2007. Cost of revenue for the nine months
ended December 31, 2008 was $310.4 million, an increase of $35.9 million or 13.1% over our cost of
revenue of $274.5 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2007. Cost of revenue excluding
payments made to repair centers for our Fault repair
services increased by $48.2 million for the nine month ended December 31,
2008 as compared to the nine month ended December 31, 2007. Payments made to repair centers
decreased by $12.3 million to $115.9 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 from
$128.2 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2007 mainly due to decreased business from
existing clients of WNS Assistance, our auto claims business. Operating employee compensation
increased by $15.8 million due to an increase in headcount and wages. The increase in headcount was
primarily attributable to our acquisition of Aviva Global. Share-based compensation cost included
in operating employee compensation increased by $0.8 million for the nine months ended December 31,
2008 as compared to the nine months ended December 31, 2007. In addition, infrastructure costs
increased by $32.3 million mainly on account of payments made to
the repair centers by Call 24/7
for our Non fault repair services and depreciation cost increased by $2.2 million due to the opening of
new delivery centers, one each in Mumbai, Pune, Gurgaon, Sri Lanka, Romania and the Philippines,
and the acquisition of delivery centers in Pune, Bangalore, Chennai and Sri Lanka in connection
with the acquisition of Aviva Global. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in travel
costs by $2.1 million.
Gross Profit
Gross profit for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 was $96.3 million, or 23.7% of revenue, as
compared to $69.2 million, or 20.1% of revenue, for the nine months ended December 31, 2007. Gross
profit as a percentage of revenue less repair payments was 33.1% for the nine months ended December
31, 2008 compared to 32.1% for the nine months ended
December 31, 2007. Gross profit as a
percentage of revenue less repair payments increased by approximately 1.0% for the nine months
ended December 31, 2008 as compared to the nine months ended December 31, 2007 primarily on account
of an increase in revenue less repair payments of $75.3 million as discussed above.
31
SG&A Expenses
SG&A expenses for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 were $58.4 million, an increase of $7.1
million or 13.9% over our SG&A expenses of $51.3 million for the nine months ended December 31,
2007. This increase was primarily on account of (i) an increase in non-operating employee
compensation by $10.6 million due to an increase in head count and wages, including an increase in
share-based compensation costs by $4.3 million, (ii) an increase in facilities costs by $1.7
million due primarily to the setting up of new delivery centers, one each in Mumbai, Pune, Gurgaon,
Sri Lanka, Romania and the Philippines, and the acquisition of delivery centers in Pune, Bangalore,
Chennai and Sri Lanka in connection with the acquisition of Aviva Global and (iii) increase in
professional fee by $0.1 million. This increase was partially offset by (i) a decrease in the
provision for bad debts by $1.5 million, (ii) a decrease in other employee related costs such as
recruitment and training costs by $1.3 million, (iii) a decrease in travel expenses by $1.5
million, (iv) a decrease in other administration related expenses such as communication costs and
marketing costs by $0.6 million, (v) a decrease in fringe benefit tax payable by us on the
allotment of shares pursuant to the exercise or vesting, on or after April 1, 2008, of options and
RSUs granted to employees by $0.3 million, and (v) a decrease in other taxes by $0.1 million. SG&A
expenses as a percentage of revenue was 14.4% for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 as
compared to 14.9% for the nine months ended December 31, 2007. SG&A expenses as a percentage of
revenue less repair payments was 20.1% for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to
23.8% for the nine months ended December 31, 2007.
Amortization of Intangible Assets
Amortization of intangible assets was $16.9 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2008, as
compared to $2.2 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2007. The increase was primarily on
account of amortization of intangible assets acquired through our acquisitions of Marketics in May
2007 (for the full period of the nine months ended December 31, 2008 as opposed to a partial period
during the nine months ended December 31, 2007), Flovate in June 2007 (for the full period of the
nine months ended December 31, 2008 as opposed to a partial period during the nine months ended
December 31, 2007), Call 24/7 in April 2008, BizAps in June 2008 and Aviva Global in July 2008.
Impairment of Goodwill and Intangible Assets
We performed impairment reviews of goodwill and intangible assets when FMFC filed a voluntary
petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code
in August 2007 as a result of the
secondary mortgage market crisis. We had $15.5 million of impairment of goodwill and intangible
assets during the nine months ended December 31, 2007, consisting of impairment of $9.1 million of
goodwill recognized and impairment of $6.4 million of intangible assets acquired in connection with
the acquisition of Trinity Partners in November 2005. We had no impairment of goodwill and
intangible assets in the nine months ended December 31, 2008.
Operating Income
Operating income for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 was $21.0 million compared to
operating income of $0.3 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2007, due to the reasons
discussed above. Operating income as a percentage of revenue was 5.2% for the nine months ended
December 31, 2008 as compared to operating income as a percentage of revenue of 0.1% for the nine
months ended December 31, 2007. Operating income as a percentage of revenue less repair payments
was 7.2% for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to operating income as a
percentage of revenue less repair payments of 0.1% for the nine months ended December 31, 2007.
32
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other expenses, net for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 was $5.9 million as compared to
other income of $6.9 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2007, primarily on account of a
foreign exchange loss of $8.1 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to a
foreign exchange gain of $2.4 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2007 and a decrease in
interest and other income to $2.2 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 from $4.6
million for the nine months ended December 31, 2007.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 was $7.3 million primarily relating to
the term loan taken to fund the AVIVA transaction. No interest expense was incurred for the nine
months ended December 31, 2007.
Provision for Income Taxes
Provision for income taxes for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 was $2.3 million, as
compared to $3.8 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2007. This decrease is primarily on
account of higher deferred tax credit during the nine months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to
nine months ended December 31, 2007.
Net Income
Net income
for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 was $5.5 million as compared to net income
of $3.4 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2007. Net income as a percentage of revenue
was 1.3% for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to net income of 1.0% for the nine
months ended December 31, 2007. Net income as percentage of
revenue less repair payments was 1.9%
for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to 1.6% for the nine months ended December
31, 2007.
Minority Interest
Minority
interest for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 was a
benefit of $0.2 million. This was primarily
on account of loss in the joint venture unit in the Philippines. There was no minority interest for the
nine months ended December 31, 2007.
Net Income after Minority Interest
Net income after minority interest for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 was $5.6 million as
compared to net income after minority interest of $3.4 million for the nine months ended December
31, 2007. Net income after minority interest as a percentage of revenue was 1.4% for the nine
months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to net income after minority interest of 1.0% for the
nine months ended December 31, 2007. Net income after minority interest as percentage of revenue
less repair payments was 1.9% for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to 1.6% for
the nine months ended December 31, 2007.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Historically, our sources of funding have principally been from cash flow from operations
supplemented by equity and short-term debt financing as required. We obtained a term loan with
ICICI Bank UK Plc as agent to fund, together with existing cash and cash equivalents, the AVIVA
transaction as described under Recent Developments AVIVA Transaction. Our capital
requirements have principally been for the establishment of operations facilities to support our
growth and for acquisitions. During the nine months ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
our net income was $5.6 million and $3.4 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents of $36.6 million. We typically seek to
invest our available cash on hand in bank deposits and money market instruments.
33
As of December 31, 2008, Call 24/7, our wholly-owned subsidiary acquired in April 2008, had a
short-term line of credit consisting of an overdraft and invoice discounting facility with a bank
in the UK. The limits for the overdraft and invoice discounting facility are £0.3 million ($0.4
million based on the exchange rate as of December 31, 2008) and £4.0 million ($5.8 million based on
the exchange rate as of December 31, 2008), respectively. As of December 31, 2008, $5.5 million was
outstanding from this facility. During the quarter ended December 31, 2008, the Company repaid the
short-term loan taken from HDFC Limited, a related party, aggregating
to $6.3 million and the working capital loan facility from The
Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation aggregating to
$1.6 million.
As part of the AVIVA acquisition in July 2008, we became a party to three agreements pursuant to
which we were granted options to purchase the delivery center in Magarpatta, Pune in three phases.
We exercised our option under the first phase in December 2008 at a total cost of approximately
$3.3 million. The purchase of the delivery center under the
first phase was completed in December 2008. We have provided notice of exercise of our options under the second and third phases
in January 2009. Completion of the purchase of the delivery center under the second and third
phases is expected to occur in March 2009 and September 2009, respectively, at a total cost
of $1.4 million and $0.7 million, respectively. The acquisition of the property will not result in additional space being
made available.
Our business strategy requires us to continuously expand our delivery capabilities. We expect to
incur capital expenditure on setting up new delivery centers or expanding existing delivery centers
and setting up related technology to enable offshore execution and management of clients business
processes. We believe that our anticipated cash generated from operating activities and cash and
cash equivalents in hand will be sufficient to meet our estimated capital expenditure needs for
fiscal 2009. However, under the current extreme market conditions as discussed under Recent
Developments Global Market and Economic Conditions, there can be no assurance that our business
activity would be maintained at the expected level to generate the anticipated cash flows from
operations. If the current market conditions persist or further deteriorate, we may experience a
decrease in demand for our services, resulting in our cash flows from operations being lower than
anticipated. If our cash flows from operations is lower than anticipated, including as a result of
the ongoing downturn in the market conditions or otherwise, we may need to obtain additional
financing to pursue certain of our expansion plans. Further, we may in the future consider making
acquisitions which we expect to be able to finance partly or fully from cash generated from
operating activities. If we have significant growth through acquisitions or require additional
operating facilities beyond those currently planned to service new client contracts, we may also
need to obtain additional financing. If current market conditions continue to persist or
deteriorate further, we may not be able to obtain additional financing or any such additional
financing may be available to us on unfavorable terms. An inability to pursue additional
opportunities will have a material adverse effect on our ability to maintain our desired level of
revenue growth in future periods.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Cash flows provided by operating activities were $40.4 million for the nine months ended December
31, 2008 as compared to $20.7 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2007. The increase in
cash flows provided by operating activities for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 as compared
to the nine months ended December 31, 2007 was attributable to an increase in working capital and
an increase in net income as adjusted by non-cash related items. The increase in working capital by
$13.1 million was primarily attributable to an increase in accounts receivables by $26.0 million
due to an increase in revenues and higher collections, a decrease in deferred revenue by $6.9
million and an increase in other current assets by $5.5 million which was partially offset by a
decrease in other current liabilities by $13.2 million and a decrease in accounts payable by $12.5
million. The increase in net income as adjusted of non-cash related items by $4.5 million was
primarily on account of increase in net income by $2.0 million and an increase in non cash items
of an increase in depreciation by $17.1 million and an increase in stock compensation cost by $5.1
million offset by the impairment of intangibles and goodwill amounting to $15.5 million in the nine
months ended December 31, 2007, a decrease in the provision for doubtful debts by $1.2 million and
a decrease in deferred income taxes by $1.6 million.
34
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Cash flows used in investing activities were $300.1 million for the nine months ended December 31,
2008 as compared to $42.8 million used for the nine months ended December 31, 2007. The increase in
cash flow used in investing activities for nine months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to nine
months ended December 31, 2007 was primarily on account of a higher acquisition cost of $291.2
million paid towards the transaction with AVIVA, and the acquisitions of Call 24/7 and BizAps in
the nine months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to $34.8 million paid towards the acquisitions
of Marketics and Flovate in the nine months ended December 31, 2007.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Cash inflows from financing activities were $200.6 million for the nine months ended December 31,
2008 as compared to an inflow of $3.7 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2007. This was
mainly on account of the receipt of proceeds from our long term debt with ICICI Bank UK Plc as
agent amounting to $199.4 million in the nine months ended December 31, 2008.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements or obligations.
Tax Assessment Orders
Transfer pricing regulations to which we are subject require that any international transaction
among WNS and its subsidiaries, or the WNS group enterprises, be on arms-length terms. We believe that the international
transactions among the WNS group enterprises are on arms-length terms. If, however, the
applicable tax authorities determine the transactions among the WNS
group enterprises do not meet
arms length criteria, we may incur increased tax liability, including accrued interest and
penalties. This would cause our tax expense to increase, possibly materially, thereby reducing our
profitability and cash flows. The applicable tax authorities may also disallow deductions or tax
holiday benefits claimed by us and assess additional taxable income on us in connection with their
review of our tax returns.
From time to time, we receive orders of assessment from the Indian tax authorities assessing
additional taxable income on us and/or our subsidiaries in connection with their review of our tax
returns. We currently have a few orders of assessment outstanding and are vigorously disputing
those assessments. In case of disputes, the Indian tax authorities may require us to deposit with
them all or a portion of the disputed amount pending resolution of
the matter on appeal. Any amount paid by
us as deposits will be refunded to us with interest if we succeed in our appeals.
In January 2009, we received an order of assessment from the Indian tax authorities that we believe
could be material to our company given the magnitude of the claim. The order assessed additional
taxable income for fiscal 2005 on WNS Global Services Private Limited, or WNS Global, our
wholly-owned Indian subsidiary, that could give rise to an estimated $14.9 million in additional
taxes, including interest of $4.6 million. The assessment order alleges that the transfer price we
applied to international transactions between WNS Global and our other wholly-owned subsidiaries
was not appropriate, disallows certain expenses claimed as tax deductible by WNS Global and
disallows a tax holiday benefit claimed by us. After consultation with our Indian tax advisors, we
believe the chances that we would be able to overturn the assessment on appeal are strong and we
intend to continue vigorously disputing the assessment. Furthermore, first level Indian appellate authorities have recently ruled in our favor in our
dispute against an assessment order assessing additional taxable income for fiscal 2004 on WNS
Global based on similar allegations on transfer pricing and tax deductibility of similar expenses
and overturned the assessment. Although this ruling is not binding on the appellate authorities
hearing our dispute on the aforesaid assessment on fiscal 2005 received in January 2009, we believe
it will serve as persuasive authority in support of our position and also reduce the amount of
deposit that we will be required to deposit with the Indian tax authorities pending resolution of
the dispute.
No assurance can be given, however, that we will prevail in our tax disputes. If we do not
prevail, payment of additional taxes, interest and penalties may adversely affect our results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows. There can also be no assurance that we will not
receive similar or additional orders of assessment in the future.
35
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
General
Market risk is attributable to all market sensitive financial instruments including foreign
currency receivables and payables. The value of a financial instrument may change as a result of
changes in the interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and
other market changes that affect market risk sensitive instruments.
Our exposure to market risk is primarily a function of our revenue generating activities and any
future borrowings in foreign currency. The objective of market risk management is to avoid
excessive exposure of our earnings to loss. Most of our exposure to market risk arises from our
revenue and expenses that are denominated in different currencies.
The following risk management discussion and the estimated amounts generated from analytical
techniques are forward-looking statements of market risk assuming certain market conditions occur.
Our actual results in the future may differ materially from these projected results due to actual
developments in the global financial markets.
Risk Management Procedures
We manage market risk through our treasury operations. Our senior management and our board of
directors approve our treasury operations objectives and policies. The activities of our treasury
operations include management of cash resources, implementation of hedging strategies for foreign
currency exposures, implementation of borrowing strategies and monitoring compliance with market
risk limits and policies.
Components of Market Risk
Exchange Rate Risk
Our exposure to market risk arises principally from exchange rate risk. Although substantially all
of our revenue less repair payments is denominated in pounds sterling, US dollars and Euros, a
significant portion of our expenses for the three months and nine months ended December 31, 2008
(net of payments to repair centers made as part of our WNS Auto Claims BPO segment) are incurred
and paid in Indian rupees. The exchange rates among the Indian rupee, the pound sterling and the US
dollar have changed substantially in recent years and may fluctuate substantially in the future.
Our exchange rate risk primarily arises from our foreign currency-denominated receivables and
payables. Based upon our level of operations for the nine months ended December 31, 2008, a
sensitivity analysis shows that a 5% appreciation in the pound sterling against the US dollar would
have increased revenue for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 by approximately $14.7 million.
Similarly, a 5% appreciation in the Indian rupee against the US dollar would have increased our
expenses incurred and paid in Indian rupee for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 by
approximately $9.0 million.
To protect against exchange gains (losses) on forecasted inter-company revenue, we have instituted
a foreign currency cash flow hedging program. We hedge a part of our forecasted external and
inter-company revenue denominated in foreign currencies with forward contracts and options.
36
Interest Rate Risk
Our exposure to interest rate risk arises principally from our borrowings under the term loan
facility of $200 million with ICICI Bank UK Plc as agent and arranger and ICICI Bank Canada as
arranger which has a floating rate of interest linked to US dollar LIBOR. The costs of floating
rate borrowings may be affected by the fluctuations in the interest rates. In connection with the
term loan, we entered into interest rate swap agreements with ICICI Bank Limited and DBS Bank
Limited during the nine months ended December 31, 2008. The swap agreements aggregate $200 million
in notional principal amount. These swap agreements effectively convert the term loan of $200
million from variable interest rate to fixed rate. We thereby manage our exposure to changes in
market interest rates under the term loan. Our use of derivative instruments is limited to
effective fixed and floating interest rate swap agreements used to manage well-defined interest
rate risk exposures. We monitor our positions and do not anticipate non-performance by the
counterparties. We do not enter into interest rate swap agreements for trading and speculative
purposes.
Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist
principally of cash equivalents, accounts receivable from related parties, accounts receivables
from others and bank deposits. By their nature, all such financial instruments involve risk
including the credit risk of non-performance by counter parties. Our cash equivalents, bank
deposits and restricted cash are invested with banks or instruments with high investment grade
credit ratings. Accounts receivable are typically unsecured and are derived from revenue earned
from clients primarily based in Europe and North America. We monitor the credit worthiness of our
clients to which we have granted credit terms in the normal course of the business. We believe
there is no significant risk of loss in the event of non-performance of the counter parties to
these financial instruments, other than the amounts already provided for in our financial
statements.
37
Part III RISK FACTORS
Our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows can be impacted by a number of
factors, including, but not limited to those set forth below, any one of which could cause our
actual results to vary materially from recent results or from our anticipated future results. Since
our annual report on Form 20-F for our fiscal year ended March 31, 2008 submitted to the SEC on
August 1, 2008, the recent market and economic conditions in the United States, Europe and Asia
have continued to be challenging resulting in increased market volatility and diminished
expectations for the economy globally. If these market conditions continue or, if macroeconomic
conditions worsen, our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely
affected. See Risks Related to Our Business Our revenue is highly dependent on clients
concentrated in a few industries, as well as clients located primarily in Europe and the United
States. Economic slowdowns or factors that affect these industries or the health of Europe or the
United States could reduce our revenue and seriously harm our business.
In addition, in January 2009, we received an order of assessment from the Indian tax authorities
that we believe could be material to us given the magnitude of the claim. The order assessed
additional taxable income for fiscal 2005 on our wholly-owned Indian subsidiary, WNS Global
Services Private Limited, or WNS Global, that could give rise to an estimated $14.9 million in
additional taxes, including interest of $4.6 million. See Risks Related to India If the
government of India reduces or withdraws tax benefits and other incentives it currently provides to
companies within our industry or if the same are not available for any other reason, our financial
condition could be negatively affected.
Risks Related to Our Business
We may be unable to effectively manage our rapid growth and maintain effective internal controls,
which could have a material adverse effect on our operations, results of operations and financial
condition.
Since we were founded in April 1996, and especially since Warburg Pincus & Co., or Warburg Pincus,
acquired a controlling stake in our company in May 2002, we have experienced rapid growth and
significantly expanded our operations. Our revenue has grown at a compound annual growth rate of
50.6% to $459.9 million in fiscal 2008 from $202.8 million in fiscal 2006. Our revenue less repair
payments has grown at a compound annual growth rate of 40.2% to $290.7 million in fiscal 2008 from
$147.9 million in fiscal 2006. Our employees have increased to 18,104 as of March 31, 2008 from
10,433 as of March 31, 2006. In January 2008, we launched a 133-seat facility in Bucharest,
Romania, to deliver finance and accounting, and customer support services across a range of
industries in French, German, Italian and Spanish to clients with European operations. In addition,
in fiscal 2008, we set up new delivery centers in Pune, Mumbai, Gurgaon, and Bangalore. Our
majority owned subsidiary, WNS Philippines Inc., set up a delivery center in the Philippines in
April 2008. WNS Philippines Inc. is a joint venture company set up with Advanced Contact Solutions,
Inc., a leader in business process outsourcing, or BPO, services and customer care in the
Philippines. We now have delivery centers in five locations in India, Sri Lanka, Romania, the
Philippines and the UK. In fiscal 2009, we intend to set up new delivery centers in Mumbai, Nashik,
Gurgaon and Pune. In July 2008, we entered into a transaction with AVIVA International Holdings
Limited, or AVIVA, consisting of a share sale and purchase agreement pursuant to which we acquired
from AVIVA all the shares of Aviva Global and a master services agreement with AVIVA MS, or the
AVIVA master services agreement, pursuant to which we will provide BPO services to AVIVAs UK and
Canadian businesses. Aviva Global was the business process offshoring subsidiary of AVIVA. See
Part II Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Recent Developments AVIVA Transaction for more details on this transaction. We intend to
continue expansion in the foreseeable future to pursue existing and potential market opportunities.
This rapid growth places significant demands on our management and operational resources. In order
to manage growth effectively, we must implement and improve operational systems, procedures and
internal controls on a timely basis. If we fail to implement these systems, procedures and controls
on a timely basis, we may not be able to service our clients needs, hire and retain new employees,
pursue new business, complete future acquisitions or operate our business effectively. Failure to
effectively transfer new client business to our delivery centers, properly budget transfer costs or
accurately estimate operational costs associated with new contracts could result in delays in
executing client contracts, trigger service level penalties or cause our profit margins not to meet
our expectations or our historical profit margins. As a result of any of these problems associated
with expansion, our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be
materially and adversely affected.
38
A few major clients account for a significant portion of our revenue and any loss of business from
these clients could reduce our revenue and significantly harm our business.
We have derived and believe that we will continue to derive in the near term a significant portion
of our revenue from a limited number of large clients. For fiscal 2008 and 2007, our five largest
clients accounted for 57.3% and 55.2% of our revenue and 42.2% and 45.7% of our revenue less repair
payments, respectively.
First Magnus Financial Corporation, or FMFC, a US mortgage lender, was one of our major clients
from November 2005 to August 2007. FMFC was a major client of Trinity Partners which we acquired in
November 2005 from the First Magnus Group. In August 2007, FMFC filed a voluntary petition for
relief under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code. For the three months ended June 30, 2007 and
2006, FMFC accounted for 3.7% and 6.5% of our revenue, and 6.0% and 7.5% our revenue less repair
payments, respectively. In fiscal 2007, FMFC accounted for 4.3% of our revenue and 6.8% of our
revenue less repair payments. The loss of revenue from FMFC materially reduced our revenue in
fiscal 2008.
Our contracts with another major client, AVIVA, provide Aviva Global, which was AVIVAs business
process offshoring subsidiary, options to require us to transfer the relevant projects and
operations of our facilities at Sri Lanka and Pune to Aviva Global. On January 1, 2007, Aviva
Global exercised its call option requiring us to transfer the Sri Lanka facility to Aviva Global
effective July 2, 2007. Effective July 2, 2007, we transferred the Sri Lanka facility to Aviva
Global and we lost the revenues generated by the Sri Lanka facility. From April 1, 2007 through
July 2, 2007, the Sri Lanka facility contributed $2.0 million of revenue and for the three months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the Sri Lanka facility accounted for 1.8% and 2.7% of our revenue,
respectively, and 2.8% and 3.1% of our revenue less repair payments, respectively. In fiscal 2007
and 2006, the Sri Lanka facility accounted for 1.9% and 3.3% of our revenue, respectively, and 3.0%
and 4.5% of our revenue less repair payments, respectively. We may in the future enter into
contracts with other clients with similar call options that may result in the loss of revenue that
may have a material impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash
flows, particularly during the quarter in which the option takes effect.
With the transaction that we entered into with AVIVA in July 2008 described under Part II
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Recent
Developments AVIVA Transaction above, we have, through the acquisition of Aviva Global, resumed
control of the Sri Lanka facility and we have continued to retain ownership of the Pune facility
and we expect these facilities to continue to generate revenues for us under the AVIVA master
services agreement. We expect revenues from AVIVA under the AVIVA master services agreement to
account for a significant portion of our revenue. We therefore expect our dependence on AVIVA to
increase for the foreseeable future.
In addition, the volume of work performed for specific clients is likely to vary from year to year,
particularly since we may not be the exclusive outside service provider for our clients. Thus, a
major client in one year may not provide the same level of revenue in any subsequent year. The loss
of some or all of the business of any large client could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. A number of factors other than
our performance could cause the loss of or reduction in business or revenue from a client, and
these factors are not predictable. For example, a client may demand price reductions, change its
outsourcing strategy or move work in-house. A client may also be acquired by a company with a
different outsourcing strategy that intends to switch to another business process outsourcing
service provider or return work in-house.
Our revenue is highly dependent on clients concentrated in a few industries, as well as clients
located primarily in Europe and the United States. Economic slowdowns or factors that affect these
industries or the health of Europe or the United States could reduce our revenue and seriously harm
our business.
A substantial portion of our clients are concentrated in the banking, financial services and
insurance, or BFSI, industry and the travel industry. In fiscal 2008 and 2007, 57.4% and 61.8% of
our revenue, respectively, and 32.7% and 38.7% of our revenue less repair payments, respectively,
were derived from clients in the BFSI industry. During the same periods, clients in the travel
industry contributed 22.5% and 22.8% of our revenue, respectively, and 35.6% and 36.6% of our
revenue less repair payments, respectively. Our business and growth largely depend on continued
demand for our services from clients in these industries and other industries that we may target in
the future, as well as on trends in these industries to outsource business processes. Over the past
few months, there has also been a significant slowdown in the growth of the global economy
accompanied by a significant reduction in consumer
39
spending worldwide. Certain of our targeted industries are especially vulnerable to the crisis in
the financial and credit markets or to the economic downturn. A continuing downturn in any of our
targeted industries, particularly the BFSI or travel industries, a slowdown or reversal of the
trend to outsource business processes in any of these industries or the introduction of regulation
which restricts or discourages companies from outsourcing could result in a decrease in the demand
for our services and adversely affect our results of operations. For example, as a result of the
mortgage market crisis, in August 2007, FMFC, a US mortgage services client, filed a voluntary
petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code. FMFC was a major client of Trinity
Partners which we acquired in November 2005 from the First Magnus Group and became one of our major
clients. In fiscal 2008 and 2007, FMFC accounted for 0.9% and 4.3% of our revenue, respectively,
and 1.4% and 6.8% of our revenue less repair payments, respectively. For the three months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006, FMFC accounted for 3.7% and 6.5% of our revenue, respectively, and 6.0% and
7.5% our revenue less repair payments, respectively. The downturn in the mortgage market could
result in a further decrease in the demand for our services and adversely affect our results of our
operations.
Further, the current downturn in worldwide economic and business conditions may result in our
clients reducing or postponing their outsourced business requirements, which may in turn decrease
the demand for our services and adversely affect our results of operations. See Part II
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Recent
Developments Global Market and Economic Conditions. In particular, our revenues are highly
dependent on the economic health of Europe and the United States, which are continuing to show
signs of significant weakness. In fiscal 2008 and 2007, 74.5% and 76.3% of our revenue,
respectively, and 59.7% and 62.0% of our revenue less repair payments, respectively, were derived
from clients located in Europe. During the same periods, 24.7% and 22.9% of our revenue,
respectively, and 39.1% and 36.8% of our revenue less repair payments, respectively, were derived
from clients located in North America (primarily the United States). Any further weakening of the
European or United States economy may have an adverse impact on our revenue.
Other developments may also lead to a decline in the demand for our services in these industries.
For example, the crisis in the financial and credit markets in the United States has led to a
significant change in the financial services industry in the United States in recent times, with
the United States federal government being forced to take over or provide financial support to
leading financial institutions and with leading investment banks going bankrupt or being forced to
sell themselves in distressed circumstances. Significant changes in the financial services industry
or any of the other industries on which we focus, or a consolidation in any of these industries or
acquisitions, particularly involving our clients, may decrease the potential number of buyers of
our services. Any significant reduction in or the elimination of the use of the services we provide
within any of these industries would result in reduced revenue and harm our business. Our clients
may experience rapid changes in their prospects, substantial price competition and pressure on
their profitability. Although such pressures can encourage outsourcing as a cost reduction measure,
they may also result in increasing pressure on us from clients in these key industries to lower our
prices, which could negatively affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and
cash flows.
Our senior management team and other key team members in our business units are critical to our
continued success and the loss of such personnel could harm our business.
Our future success substantially depends on the continued service and performance of the members of
our senior management team and other key team members in each of our business units. These
personnel possess technical and business capabilities including domain expertise that are difficult
to replace. There is intense competition for experienced senior management and personnel with
technical and industry expertise in the business process outsourcing industry, and we may not be
able to retain our key personnel. Although we have entered into employment contracts with our
executive officers, certain terms of those agreements may not be enforceable and in any event these
agreements do not ensure the continued service of these executive officers. The loss of key members
of our senior management or other key team members, particularly to competitors, could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
40
We may fail to attract and retain enough sufficiently trained employees to support our operations,
as competition for highly skilled personnel is intense and we experience significant employee
attrition. These factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows.
The business process outsourcing industry relies on large numbers of skilled employees, and our
success depends to a significant extent on our ability to attract, hire, train and retain qualified
employees. The business process outsourcing industry, including our company, experiences high
employee attrition. In fiscal 2008, our attrition rate for associates (employees who execute
business processes for our clients following their completion of a six-month probationary period)
was approximately 38.4% which we believe is broadly in line with our peers in the offshore business
process outsourcing industry. There is significant competition in India for professionals with the
skills necessary to perform the services we offer to our clients. Increased competition for these
professionals, in the business process outsourcing industry or otherwise, could have an adverse
effect on us. A significant increase in the attrition rate among employees with specialized skills
could decrease our operating efficiency and productivity and could lead to a decline in demand for
our services.
In addition, our ability to maintain and renew existing engagements and obtain new businesses will
depend, in large part, on our ability to attract, train and retain personnel with skills that
enable us to keep pace with growing demands for outsourcing, evolving industry standards and
changing client preferences. Our failure either to attract, train and retain personnel with the
qualifications necessary to fulfill the needs of our existing and future clients or to assimilate
new employees successfully could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We may not be successful in achieving the expected benefits from our transaction with AVIVA in July
2008, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial
condition and cash flows. Furthermore, the term loan that we have incurred to fund the transaction
may put a strain on our financial position.
In July 2008, we entered into a transaction with AVIVA consisting of a share sale and purchase
agreement pursuant to which we acquired all the shares of Aviva Global and the AVIVA master
services agreement pursuant to which we will provide BPO services to AVIVAs UK and Canadian
businesses. We completed the acquisition of Aviva Global in July 2008. Aviva Global was the
business process offshoring subsidiary of AVIVA with facilities in Bangalore, India, and Colombo,
Sri Lanka. There are also two facilities in Chennai and Pune, India, which are operated by third
party BPO providers but in respect of which Aviva Global has exercised its option to require such
BPO providers to transfer such facilities to Aviva Global. Completion of the transfer of the
Chennai facility and the Pune facility to Aviva Global occurred in July 2008 and August 2008,
respectively. The total consideration (including legal and professional fees) for this transaction
with AVIVA amounted to $251.8 million, subject to closing account adjustments. We incurred a term
loan of $200 million to fund, together with cash in hand, the consideration for the transaction.
We are in the process of integrating Aviva Globals various facilities with the rest of our
business. We cannot assure you that such integration will be completed successfully. Failure to
integrate the acquisition or to manage growth effectively could adversely affect our business,
results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. We may not be able to grow our revenues,
expand our service offerings and market share, or achieve the accretive benefits that we expected
from the acquisition of Aviva Global and the AVIVA master services agreement.
Furthermore, the term loan that we have incurred to fund the transaction may put a strain on our
financial position. For example, it could:
|
|
|
increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions; |
|
|
|
|
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to
payments on the term loan, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund
capital expenditures, working capital and other general corporate purposes; |
41
|
|
|
require us to seek lenders consent prior to paying dividends on our ordinary shares;
and |
|
|
|
|
limit our ability to incur additional borrowings or raise additional financing
through equity or debt instruments. |
In addition, the current rate of interest payable on the term loan is US dollar LIBOR plus 3% per
annum. However, this interest rate is subject to change as we have agreed that the arrangers for
the term loan have the right at any time prior to the completion of the syndication of the term
loan to change the pricing of the term loan if any such arranger determines that such change is
necessary to ensure a successful syndication of the term loan. An increase of 1% in the interest
rate payable on our outstanding term loan will increase the interest payable by $2 million per
annum. On November 12, 2008, the arrangers for the term loan and we reached an in-principle
agreement to close the syndication of the term loan with an increase in the interest rate on the
term loan by 0.5% per annum effective November 10, 2008. The issuance of the syndication closure
letter on these terms is subject to the formal approval process of
the arrangers. There is, however,
no assurance that we will receive the syndication closure letter on
these in-principle agreed terms.
Wage increases in India may prevent us from sustaining our competitive advantage and may reduce our
profit margin.
Salaries and related benefits of our operations staff and other employees in India are among our
most significant costs. Wage costs in India have historically been significantly lower than wage
costs in the US and Europe for comparably skilled professionals, which has been one of our
competitive advantages. However, because of rapid economic growth in India, increased demand for
business process outsourcing to India and increased competition for skilled employees in India,
wages for comparably skilled employees in India are increasing at a faster rate than in the US and
Europe, which may reduce this competitive advantage. In addition, if the US dollar or the pound
sterling further declines in value against the Indian rupee, wages in the US or the UK will further
decrease relative to wages in India, which may further reduce our competitive advantage. We may
need to increase our levels of employee compensation more rapidly than in the past to remain
competitive in attracting the quantity and quality of employees that our business requires. Wage
increases may reduce our profit margins and have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition and cash flows.
Our operating results may differ from period to period, which may make it difficult for us to
prepare accurate internal financial forecasts and respond in a timely manner to offset such period
to period fluctuations.
Our operating results may differ significantly from period to period due to factors such as client
losses, variations in the volume of business from clients resulting from changes in our clients
operations, the business decisions of our clients regarding the use of our services, delays or
difficulties in expanding our operational facilities and infrastructure, changes to our pricing
structure or that of our competitors, inaccurate estimates of resources and time required to
complete ongoing projects, currency fluctuation and seasonal changes in the operations of our
clients. For example, our clients in the travel industry experience seasonal changes in their
operations in connection with the year-end holiday season and the school year, as well as episodic
factors such as adverse weather conditions or strikes by pilots or air traffic controllers.
Transaction volumes can be impacted by market conditions affecting the travel and insurance
industries, including natural disasters, health scares (such as severe acute respiratory syndrome,
or SARS, and avian influenza, or bird flu) and terrorist attacks. In addition, our contracts do not
generally commit our clients to providing us with a specific volume of business.
In addition, the long sales cycle for our services, which typically ranges from three to 12 months,
and the internal budget and approval processes of our prospective clients make it difficult to
predict the timing of new client engagements. Revenue is recognized upon actual provision of
services and when the criteria for recognition are achieved. Accordingly, the financial benefit of
gaining a new client may be delayed due to delays in the implementation of our services. These
factors may make it difficult for us to prepare accurate internal financial forecasts or replace
anticipated revenue that we do not receive as a result of those delays. Due to the above factors,
it is possible that in some future quarters our operating results may be significantly below the
expectations of the public market, analysts and investors.
42
Our clients may terminate contracts before completion or choose not to renew contracts which could
adversely affect our business and reduce our revenue.
The terms of our client contracts typically range from three to five years. Many of our client
contracts can be terminated by our clients with or without cause, with three to six months notice
and, in most cases, without penalty. The termination of a substantial percentage of these contracts
could adversely affect our business and reduce our revenue. Contracts representing 26.4% of our
revenue and 20.6% of our revenue less repair payments from our clients in fiscal 2008 will expire
on or before March 31, 2009. Failure to meet contractual requirements could result in cancellation
or non-renewal of a contract. Some of our contracts may be terminated by the client if certain of
our key personnel working on the client project leave our employment and we are unable to find
suitable replacements. In addition, a contract termination or significant reduction in work
assigned to us by a major client could cause us to experience a higher than expected number of
unassigned employees, which would increase our cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue until we
are able to reduce or reallocate our headcount. We may not be able to replace any client that
elects to terminate or not renew its contract with us, which would adversely affect our business
and revenue.
Some of our client contracts contain provisions which, if triggered, could result in lower future
revenue and have an adverse effect on our business.
If our clients agree to provide us with a specified volume and scale of business or to provide us
with business for a specified minimum duration, we may, in return, agree to include certain
provisions in our contracts with such clients which provide for downward revision of our prices
under certain circumstances. For example, certain client contracts provide that if during the term
of the contract, we were to offer similar services to any other client on terms and conditions more
favorable than those provided in the contract, we would be obliged to offer equally favorable terms
and conditions to the client. This may result in lower revenue and profits under these contracts.
Certain other contracts allow a client in certain limited circumstances to request a benchmark
study comparing our pricing and performance with that of an agreed list of other service providers
for comparable services. Based on the results of the study and depending on the reasons for any
unfavorable variance, we may be required to make improvements in the service we provide or to
reduce the pricing for services to be performed under the remaining term of the contract. Some of
our client contracts provide that during the term of the contract and under specified
circumstances, we may not provide similar services to their competitors. Some of our contracts also
provide that, during the term of the contract and for a certain period thereafter ranging from six
to 12 months, we may not provide similar services to certain or any of their competitors using the
same personnel. These restrictions may hamper our ability to compete for and provide services to
other clients in the same industry, which may result in lower future revenue and profitability.
Some of our contracts specify that if a change in control of our company occurs during the term of
the contract, the client has the right to terminate the contract. These provisions may result in
our contracts being terminated if there is such a change in control, resulting in a potential loss
of revenue. Some of our client contracts also contain provisions that would require us to pay
penalties to our clients if we do not meet pre-agreed service level requirements. Failure to meet
these requirements could result in the payment of significant penalties by us to our clients which
in turn could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition
and cash flows.
We enter into long-term contracts with our clients, and our failure to estimate the resources and
time required for our contracts may negatively affect our profitability.
The terms of our client contracts typically range from three to five years. In many of our
contracts, we commit to long-term pricing with our clients and therefore bear the risk of cost
overruns, completion delays and wage inflation in connection with these contracts. If we fail to
estimate accurately the resources and time required for a contract, future wage inflation rates or
currency exchange rates, or if we fail to complete our contractual obligations within the
contracted timeframe, our revenue and profitability may be negatively affected.
43
Our profitability will suffer if we are not able to maintain our pricing and asset utilization
levels and control our costs.
Our profit margin, and therefore our profitability, is largely a function of our asset utilization
and the rates we are able to recover for our services. One of the most significant components of
our asset utilization is our seat utilization rate which is the average number of work shifts per
day, out of a maximum of three, for which we are able to utilize our work stations, or seats. If we
are not able to maintain the pricing for our services or an appropriate seat utilization rate,
without corresponding cost reductions, our profitability will suffer. The rates we are able to
recover for our services are affected by a number of factors, including our clients perceptions of
our ability to add value through our services, competition, introduction of new services or
products by us or our competitors, our ability to accurately estimate, attain and sustain
engagement revenue, margins and cash flows over increasingly longer contract periods and general
economic and political conditions.
Our profitability is also a function of our ability to control our costs and improve our
efficiency. As we increase the number of our employees and execute our strategies for growth, we
may not be able to manage the significantly larger and more geographically diverse workforce that
may result, which could adversely affect our ability to control our costs or improve our
efficiency.
We have incurred losses in the past and have a limited operating history. We may not be profitable
in the future and may not be able to secure additional business.
We have incurred losses in each of the three fiscal years from fiscal 2003 through fiscal 2005. In
future periods, we expect our selling, general and administrative expenses to continue to
increase. If our revenue does not grow at a faster rate than these expected increases in our
expenses, or if our operating expenses are higher than we anticipate, we may not be profitable and
we may incur additional losses.
In addition, the offshore business process outsourcing industry is a relatively new industry, and
we have a limited operating history. We started our business by offering business process
outsourcing services as part of British Airways in 1996. In fiscal 2003, we enhanced our focus on
providing business process outsourcing services to third parties. As such, we have only focused on
servicing third-party clients for a limited time. We may not be able to secure additional business
or retain current business with third-parties or add third-party clients in the future.
If we cause disruptions to our clients businesses or provide inadequate service, our clients may
have claims for substantial damages against us. Our insurance coverage may be inadequate to cover
these claims, and as a result, our profits may be substantially reduced.
Most of our contracts with clients contain service level and performance requirements, including
requirements relating to the quality of our services and the timing and quality of responses to the
clients customer inquiries. In some cases, the quality of services that we provide is measured by
quality assurance ratings and surveys which are based in part on the results of direct monitoring
by our clients of interactions between our employees and our clients customers. Failure to
consistently meet service requirements of a client or errors made by our associates in the course
of delivering services to our clients could disrupt the clients business and result in a reduction
in revenue or a claim for substantial damages against us. For example, some of our agreements
stipulate standards of service that, if not met by us, will result in lower payment to us. In
addition, a failure or inability to meet a contractual requirement could seriously damage our
reputation and affect our ability to attract new business.
Our dependence on our offshore delivery centers requires us to maintain active data and voice
communications between our main delivery centers in India, Sri Lanka,
Romania, the Philippines and the
UK, our international technology hubs in the US and the UK and our clients offices. Although we
maintain redundant facilities and communications links, disruptions could result from, among other
things, technical and electricity breakdowns, computer glitches and viruses and adverse weather
conditions. Any significant failure of our equipment or systems, or any major disruption to basic
infrastructure like power and telecommunications in the locations in which we operate, could impede
our ability to provide services to our clients, have a negative impact on our reputation, cause us
to lose clients, reduce our revenue and harm our business.
44
Under our contracts with our clients, our liability for breach of our obligations is generally
limited to actual damages suffered by the client and capped at a portion of the fees paid or
payable to us under the relevant contract. To the extent that our contracts contain limitations on
liability, such limitations may be unenforceable or otherwise may not protect us from liability for
damages. In addition, certain liabilities, such as claims of third parties for which we may be
required to indemnify our clients, are generally not limited under those agreements. Although we
have commercial general liability insurance coverage, the coverage may not continue to be available
on reasonable terms or in sufficient amounts to cover one or more large claims, and our insurers
may disclaim coverage as to any future claims. The successful assertion of one or more large claims
against us that exceed available insurance coverage, or changes in our insurance policies
(including premium increases or the imposition of large deductible or co-insurance requirements),
could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation, results of operations, financial
condition and cash flows.
We are liable to our clients for damages caused by unauthorized disclosure of sensitive and
confidential information, whether through a breach of our computer systems, through our employees
or otherwise.
We are typically required to manage, utilize and store sensitive or confidential client data in
connection with the services we provide. Under the terms of our client contracts, we are required
to keep such information strictly confidential. Our client contracts do not include any limitation
on our liability to them with respect to breaches of our obligation to maintain confidentiality on
the information we receive from them. We seek to implement measures to protect sensitive and
confidential client data and have not experienced any material breach of confidentiality to date.
However, if any person, including any of our employees, penetrates our network security or
otherwise mismanages or misappropriates sensitive or confidential client data, we could be subject
to significant liability and lawsuits from our clients or their customers for breaching contractual
confidentiality provisions or privacy laws. Although we have insurance coverage for mismanagement
or misappropriation of such information by our employees, that coverage may not continue to be
available on reasonable terms or in sufficient amounts to cover one or more large claims against us
and our insurers may disclaim coverage as to any future claims. Penetration of the network security
of our data centers could have a negative impact on our reputation which would harm our business.
Failure to adhere to the regulations that govern our business could result in us being unable to
effectively perform our services. Failure to adhere to regulations that govern our clients
businesses could result in breaches of contract with our clients.
Our clients business operations are subject to certain rules and regulations such as the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act in the US and
the Financial Services Act in the UK. Our clients may contractually require that we perform our
services in a manner that would enable them to comply with such rules and regulations. Failure to
perform our services in such a manner could result in breaches of contract with our clients and, in
some limited circumstances, civil fines and criminal penalties for us. In addition, we are required
under various Indian laws to obtain and maintain permits and licenses for the conduct of our
business. If we do not maintain our licenses or other qualifications to provide our services, we
may not be able to provide services to existing clients or be able to attract new clients and could
lose revenue, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
The international nature of our business exposes us to several risks, such as significant currency
fluctuations and unexpected changes in the regulatory requirements of multiple jurisdictions.
We have operations in India, Sri Lanka, Romania, Philippines and the UK, and we service clients
across Europe, North America and Asia. Our corporate structure also spans multiple jurisdictions,
with our parent holding company incorporated in Jersey, Channel Islands, and intermediate and
operating subsidiaries incorporated in India, Sri Lanka, Mauritius, Romania, Philippines, China,
the Netherlands, the US and the UK. As a result, we are exposed to risks typically associated with
conducting business internationally, many of which are beyond our control. These risks include:
|
|
|
significant currency fluctuations between the US dollar and the pound sterling (in
which our revenue is principally denominated) and the Indian rupee (in which a
significant portion of our costs are denominated); |
45
|
|
|
legal uncertainty owing to the overlap of different legal regimes, and problems in
asserting contractual or other rights across international borders; |
|
|
|
|
legal uncertainty owing to the overlap of different legal regimes, and problems in
asserting contractual or other rights across international borders; |
|
|
|
|
potentially adverse tax consequences, such as scrutiny of transfer pricing
arrangements by authorities in the countries in which we operate; |
|
|
|
|
potential tariffs and other trade barriers; |
|
|
|
|
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements; |
|
|
|
|
the burden and expense of complying with the laws and regulations of various
jurisdictions; and |
|
|
|
|
terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or war. |
The occurrence of any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations and financial condition.
We may not succeed in identifying suitable acquisition targets or integrating any acquired business
into our operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Our growth strategy involves gaining new clients and expanding our service offerings, both
organically and through strategic acquisitions. Historically, we have expanded some of our service
offerings and gained new clients through strategic acquisitions. For example, we acquired Aviva
Global in July 2008, Business Applications Associate Limited, or BizAps, in June 2008 and Flovate
Technologies Limited, or Flovate (which we subsequently renamed as WNS Workflow Technologies
Limited), in June 2007, and Chang Limited in April 2008. It is possible that in the future we may
not succeed in identifying suitable acquisition targets available for sale on reasonable terms,
have access to the capital required to finance potential acquisitions or be able to consummate any
acquisition. The inability to identify suitable acquisition targets or investments or the inability
to complete such transactions may affect our competitiveness and our growth prospects. In addition,
our management may not be able to successfully integrate any acquired business into our operations
and any acquisition we do complete may not result in long-term benefits to us. For example, if we
acquire a company, we could experience difficulties in assimilating that companys personnel,
operations, technology and software. In addition, the key personnel of the acquired company may
decide not to work for us. The lack of profitability of any of our acquisitions could have a
material adverse effect on our operating results. Future acquisitions may also result in the
incurrence of indebtedness or the issuance of additional equity securities and may present
difficulties in financing the acquisition on attractive terms. Acquisitions also typically involve
a number of other risks, including diversion of managements attention, legal liabilities and the
need to amortize acquired intangible assets, any of which could have a material adverse effect on
our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We recorded an impairment charge of $15.5 million to our earnings in fiscal 2008 and may be
required to record another significant charge to earnings in the future when we review our
goodwill, intangible or other assets for potential impairment.
As of March 31, 2008, we had goodwill and intangible assets of approximately $87.5 million and $9.4
million, respectively, which primarily resulted from the purchases of Marketics, Flovate, Town &
Country Assistance Limited (which we subsequently rebranded as WNS Assistance) and WNS Global
Services (Private) Limited, or WNS Global. Under US GAAP, we are required to review our goodwill,
intangible or other assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the
carrying value may not be recoverable. In addition, goodwill, intangible or other assets with
indefinite lives are required to be tested for impairment at least annually. We performed an
impairment review and recorded an impairment charge of $15.5 million to our earnings in fiscal 2008
relating to Trinity Partners. We may be required in the future to record a significant charge to
earnings in our financial statements during the period in which any impairment of our goodwill or
other intangible assets is determined. Such charges may have a significant adverse impact on our
results of operations.
46
Our facilities are at risk of damage by natural disasters.
Our operational facilities and communication hubs may be damaged in natural disasters such as
earthquakes, floods, heavy rains, tsunamis and cyclones. For example, during the floods in Mumbai
in July 2005, our operations were adversely affected as a result of the disruption of the citys
public utility and transport services making it difficult for our associates to commute to our
office. Such natural disasters may lead to disruption to information systems and telephone service
for sustained periods. Damage or destruction that interrupts our provision of outsourcing services
could damage our relationships with our clients and may cause us to incur substantial additional
expenses to repair or replace damaged equipment or facilities. We may also be liable to our clients
for disruption in service resulting from such damage or destruction. While we currently have
commercial liability insurance, our insurance coverage may not be sufficient. Furthermore, we may
be unable to secure such insurance coverage at premiums acceptable to us in the future or secure
such insurance coverage at all. Prolonged disruption of our services as a result of natural
disasters would also entitle our clients to terminate their contracts with us.
Our business may not develop in ways that we currently anticipate due to negative public reaction
to offshore outsourcing, proposed legislation or otherwise.
We have based our strategy of future growth on certain assumptions regarding our industry, services
and future demand in the market for such services. However, the trend to outsource business
processes may not continue and could reverse. Offshore outsourcing is a politically sensitive topic
in the UK, the US and elsewhere. For example, many organizations and public figures in the UK and
the US have publicly expressed concern about a perceived association between offshore outsourcing
providers and the loss of jobs in their home countries.
In addition, there has been publicity about the negative experiences, such as theft and
misappropriation of sensitive client data, of various companies that use offshore outsourcing,
particularly in India. Current or prospective clients may elect to perform such services themselves
or may be discouraged from transferring these services from onshore to offshore providers to avoid
negative perceptions that may be associated with using an offshore provider. Any slowdown or
reversal of existing industry trends towards offshore outsourcing would seriously harm our ability
to compete effectively with competitors that operate out of facilities located in the UK or the US.
A variety of US federal and state legislation has been proposed that, if enacted, could restrict or
discourage US companies from outsourcing their services to companies outside the US. For example,
legislation has been proposed that would require offshore providers of services requiring direct
interaction with clients customers to identify to clients customers where the offshore provider
is located. Because some of our clients are located in the US, any expansion of existing laws or
the enactment of new legislation restricting offshore outsourcing could adversely impact our
ability to do business with US clients and have a material and adverse effect on our business,
results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. In addition, it is possible that
legislation could be adopted that would restrict US private sector companies that have federal or
state government contracts from outsourcing their services to offshore service providers. This
would affect our ability to attract or retain clients that have such contracts.
Recent legislation introduced in the UK provides that if a company transfers or outsources its
business or a part of its business to a transferee or a service provider, the employees who were
employed in such business are entitled to become employed by the transferee or service provider on
the same terms and conditions as they had been employed before. The dismissal of such employees as
a result of such transfer of business is deemed unfair dismissal and entitles the employee to
compensation. As a result, we may become liable for redundancy payments to the employees of our
clients in the UK who outsource business to us. We believe this legislation will not affect our
existing contracts with clients in the UK. However, we may be liable under any service level
agreements we may enter into in the future pursuant to existing master services agreements with our
UK clients. In addition, this legislation may have an adverse effect on potential business from
clients in the UK.
47
We face competition from onshore and offshore business process outsourcing companies and from
information technology companies that also offer business process outsourcing services. Our clients
may also choose to run their business processes themselves, either in their home countries or
through captive units located offshore.
The market for outsourcing services is very competitive and we expect competition to intensify and
increase from a number of sources. We believe that the principal competitive factors in our markets
are price, service quality, sales and marketing skills, and industry expertise. We face significant
competition from our clients own in-house groups including, in some cases, in-house departments
operating offshore or captive units. Clients who currently outsource a significant proportion of
their business processes or information technology services to vendors in India may, for various
reasons, including to diversify geographic risk, seek to reduce their dependence on any one
country. We also face competition from onshore and offshore business process outsourcing and
information technology services companies. In addition, the trend toward offshore outsourcing,
international expansion by foreign and domestic competitors and continuing technological changes
will result in new and different competitors entering our markets. These competitors may include
entrants from the communications, software and data networking industries or entrants in geographic
locations with lower costs than those in which we operate.
Some of these existing and future competitors have greater financial, human and other resources,
longer operating histories, greater technological expertise, more recognizable brand names and more
established relationships in the industries that we currently serve or may serve in the future. In
addition, some of our competitors may enter into strategic or commercial relationships among
themselves or with larger, more established companies in order to increase their ability to address
client needs, or enter into similar arrangements with potential clients. Increased competition, our
inability to compete successfully against competitors, pricing pressures or loss of market share
could result in reduced operating margins which could harm our business, results of operations,
financial condition and cash flows.
Our controlling shareholder, Warburg Pincus, is able to control or significantly influence our
corporate actions.
Warburg Pincus beneficially owns more than 50% of our shares. As a result of its ownership
position, Warburg Pincus has the ability to control or significantly influence matters requiring
shareholder and board approval including, without limitation, the election of directors,
significant corporate transactions such as amalgamations and consolidations, changes in control of
our company and sales of all or substantially all of our assets. These actions may be taken even if
they are opposed by the other shareholders.
We have certain anti-takeover provisions in our articles of association that may discourage a
change in control.
Our articles of association contain anti-takeover provisions that could make it more difficult for
a third party to acquire us without the consent of our board of directors. These provisions
include:
|
|
|
a classified board of directors with staggered three-year terms; and |
|
|
|
|
the ability of our board of directors to determine the rights, preferences and
privileges of our preferred shares and to issue the preferred shares without shareholder
approval, which could be exercised by our board of directors to increase the number of
outstanding shares and prevent or delay a takeover attempt. |
These provisions could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if the third
partys offer may be considered beneficial by many shareholders. As a result, shareholders may be
limited in their ability to obtain a premium for their shares.
It may be difficult for you to effect service of process and enforce legal judgments against us or
our affiliates.
We are incorporated in Jersey, Channel Islands, and our primary operating subsidiary, WNS Global,
is incorporated in India. A majority of our directors and senior executives are not residents of
the US and virtually all of our assets and the assets of those persons are located outside the US.
As a result, it may not be possible for you to effect service of process within the US upon those
persons or us. In addition, you may be unable to enforce judgments obtained in courts of the US
against those persons outside the jurisdiction of their residence, including judgments predicated
solely upon the securities laws of the US.
48
Risks Related to India
A substantial portion of our assets and operations are located in India and we are subject to
regulatory, economic, social and political uncertainties in India.
Our primary operating subsidiary, WNS Global, is incorporated in India, and a substantial portion
of our assets and employees are located in India. We intend to continue to develop and expand our
facilities in India. The government of India, however, has exercised and continues to exercise
significant influence over many aspects of the Indian economy. The government of India has provided
significant tax incentives and relaxed certain regulatory restrictions in order to encourage
foreign investment in specified sectors of the economy, including the business process outsourcing
industry. Those programs that have benefited us include tax holidays, liberalized import and export
duties and preferential rules on foreign investment and repatriation. We cannot assure you that
such liberalization policies will continue. Various factors, including a collapse of the present
coalition government due to the withdrawal of support of coalition members, could trigger
significant changes in Indias economic liberalization and deregulation policies and disrupt
business and economic conditions in India generally and our business in particular. The government
of India may decide to introduce the reservation policy. According to this policy, all companies
operating in the private sector in India, including our subsidiaries in India, would be required to
reserve a certain percentage of jobs for the economically underprivileged population in the
relevant state where such companies are incorporated. If this policy is introduced, our ability to
hire employees of our choice may be restricted. Our financial performance and the market price of
our American Depositary Shares, or ADSs, may be adversely affected by changes in inflation, exchange rates and controls, interest
rates, government of India policies (including taxation policies), social stability or other
political, economic or diplomatic developments affecting India in the future.
India has witnessed communal clashes in the past. Although such clashes in India have, in the
recent past, been sporadic and have been contained within reasonably short periods of time, any
such civil disturbance in the future could result in disruptions in transportation or communication
networks, as well as have adverse implications for general economic conditions in India. Such
events could have a material adverse effect on our business, on the value of our ADSs and on your
investment in our ADSs.
If the government of India reduces or withdraws tax benefits and other incentives it currently
provides to companies within our industry or if the same are not available for any other reason,
our financial condition could be negatively affected.
Under the Indian Finance Act, 2000, except for one delivery center located in Mumbai, all our
delivery centers in India benefit from a ten-year holiday from Indian corporate income taxes. As a
result, our service operations, including any businesses we acquire, have been subject to
relatively low Indian tax liabilities. We incurred minimal income tax expense on our Indian
operations in fiscal 2008 as a result of the tax holiday, compared to approximately $11.5 million
that we would have incurred if the tax holiday had not been available for that period.
The Indian Finance Act, 2000 phases out the tax holiday over a ten-year period from fiscal 2000
through fiscal 2009. In May 2008, the government of India passed the Indian Finance Act, 2008,
which extended the tax holiday period by an additional year through fiscal 2010. The tax holiday
enjoyed by our delivery centers in India expires in stages: on April 1, 2009 for one of our
delivery centers located in Pune and on April 1, 2010 for our other delivery centers located in
Mumbai, Pune, Gurgaon, Bangalore, Chennai and Nashik, except for the tax holiday enjoyed by two of
our delivery centers located in Mumbai and Nashik which expired on April 1, 2007 and April 1, 2008,
respectively. When our Indian tax holiday expires or terminates, or if the government of India
withdraws or reduces the benefits of the Indian tax holiday, our Indian tax expense will materially
increase and this increase will have a material impact on our results of operations. In the absence
of a tax holiday, income derived from India would be taxed up to a maximum of the then existing
annual tax rate which, as of March 31, 2008, was 33.99%.
In May 2007, the Indian Finance Act, 2007 was adopted, with the effect of subjecting Indian
companies that benefit from a holiday from Indian corporate income taxes to the minimum alternate
tax, or MAT, at the rate of 11.33% in the case of profits exceeding Rs. 10 million and 10.3% in the
case of profits not exceeding Rs. 10 million with effect from April 1, 2007. As a result of this
amendment to the tax regulations, we became subject to MAT and are required to pay additional taxes
commencing fiscal 2008. To the extent MAT paid exceeds the actual tax
payable on our taxable income, we would be able to set off such MAT credits against tax payable in the
succeeding seven years, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions.
49
In addition, in May 2007, the government of India implemented a fringe benefit tax on the allotment
of shares pursuant to the exercise or vesting, on or after April 1, 2007, of options and restricted
share units, or RSUs, granted to employees. The fringe benefit tax is payable by the employer at
the current rate of 33.99% on the difference between the fair market value of the options and RSUs
on the date of vesting of the options and RSUs and the exercise price of the options and the
purchase price (if any) for the RSUs, as applicable. In October 2007, the government of India
published its guidelines on how the fair market value of the options and RSUs should be determined.
The new legislation permits the employer to recover the fringe benefit tax from the employees.
Accordingly, we have amended the terms of our 2002 Stock Incentive Plan and the 2006 Incentive
Award Plan to allow us to recover the fringe benefit tax from all our employees in India except
those expatriate employees who are resident in India. In respect of these expatriate employees, we
are seeking clarification from the Indian and foreign tax authorities on the ability of such
expatriate employees to set off the fringe benefit tax from the foreign taxes payable by them. If
they are able to do so, we intend to recover the fringe benefit tax from such expatriate employees
in the future.
In 2005, the government of India implemented the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, or the SEZ
legislation, with the effect that taxable income of new operations established in designated
special economic zones, or SEZs, may be eligible for a 15-year tax holiday scheme consisting of a
complete tax holiday for the initial five years and a partial tax holiday for the subsequent ten
years, subject to the satisfaction of certain capital investment conditions. However, the Ministry
of Finance in India has expressed concern about the potential loss of tax revenues as a result of
the exemptions under the SEZ legislation. The SEZ legislation has been criticized on economic
grounds by the International Monetary Fund and the SEZ legislation may be challenged by certain
non-governmental organizations. It is possible that, as a result of such political pressures, the
procedure for obtaining the benefits of the SEZ legislation may become more onerous, the types of
land eligible for SEZ status may be further restricted or the SEZ legislation may be amended or
repealed. Moreover, there is continuing uncertainty as to the governmental and regulatory approvals
required to establish operations in the SEZs or to qualify for the tax benefit. This uncertainty
may delay our establishment of operations in the SEZs.
Transfer pricing regulations to which we are subject require that any international transaction
among WNS and its subsidiaries, or the WNS group enterprises, be on arms-length terms. We believe that the international
transactions among the WNS group enterprises are on arms-length terms. If, however, the
applicable tax authorities determine the transactions among the WNS
group enterprises do not meet
arms length criteria, we may incur increased tax liability, including accrued interest and
penalties. This would cause our tax expense to increase, possibly materially, thereby reducing our
profitability and cash flows. The applicable tax authorities may also disallow deductions or tax
holiday benefits claimed by us and assess additional taxable income on us in connection with their
review of our tax returns.
From time to time, we receive orders of assessment from the Indian tax authorities assessing
additional taxable income on us and/or our subsidiaries in connection with their review of our tax
returns. We currently have a few orders of assessment outstanding and are vigorously disputing
those assessments. In case of disputes, the Indian tax authorities may require us to deposit with
them all or a portion of the disputed amount pending resolution of
the matter on appeal. Any amount paid by
us as deposits will be refunded to us with interest if we succeed in our appeals. In January 2009,
we received an order of assessment from the Indian tax authorities that we believe could be
material to us given the magnitude of the claim. The order assessed additional taxable
income for fiscal 2005 on WNS Global, our wholly-owned Indian subsidiary, that could give rise to
an estimated $14.9 million in additional taxes, including interest of $4.6 million. The assessment
order alleges that the transfer price we applied to international transactions between WNS Global
and our other wholly-owned subsidiaries was not appropriate, disallows certain expenses claimed as
tax deductible by WNS Global and disallows a tax holiday benefit claimed by us. After consultation
with our Indian tax advisors, we believe the chances that we would be able to overturn the
assessment on appeal are strong and we intend to continue vigorously disputing the assessment. No
assurance can be given, however, that we will prevail in our tax disputes. If we do not prevail,
payment of additional taxes, interest and penalties may adversely affect our results of operations,
financial condition and cash flows. There can also be no assurance that we will not receive
similar or additional orders of assessment in the future. See Part II Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Tax Assessment Orders.
50
Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence involving India or its neighboring countries could
adversely affect our operations, resulting in a loss of client confidence and adversely affecting
our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or war involving India or its neighboring countries
may adversely affect worldwide financial markets and could potentially lead to economic recession,
which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash
flows. South Asia has, from time to time, experienced instances of civil unrest and hostilities
among neighboring countries, including India and Pakistan. In previous years, military
confrontations between India and Pakistan have occurred in the region of Kashmir and along the
India/Pakistan border. There have also been incidents in and near India such as the recent bombings
of the Taj Mahal Hotel and Oberoi Hotel in Mumbai, a terrorist attack on the Indian Parliament,
troop mobilizations along the India/Pakistan border and an aggravated geopolitical situation in the
region. Such military activity or terrorist attacks in the future could influence the Indian
economy by disrupting communications and making travel more difficult. Resulting political tensions
could create a greater perception that investments in Indian companies involve a high degree of
risk. Such political tensions could similarly create a perception that there is a risk of
disruption of services provided by India-based companies, which could have a material adverse
effect on the market for our services.
Furthermore, if India were to become engaged in armed hostilities, particularly hostilities that
were protracted or involved the threat or use of nuclear weapons, we might not be able to continue
our operations.
Restrictions on entry visas may affect our ability to compete for and provide services to clients
in the US and the UK, which could have a material adverse effect on future revenue.
The vast majority of our employees are Indian nationals. The ability of some of our executives to
work with and meet our European and North American clients and our clients from other countries
depends on the ability of our senior managers and employees to obtain the necessary visas and entry
permits. In response to previous terrorist attacks and global unrest, US and European immigration
authorities have increased the level of scrutiny in granting visas. Immigration laws in those
countries may also require us to meet certain other legal requirements as a condition to obtaining
or maintaining entry visas. These restrictions have significantly lengthened the time requirements
to obtain visas for our personnel, which has in the past resulted, and may continue to result, in
delays in the ability of our personnel to meet with our clients. In addition, immigration laws are
subject to legislative change and varying standards of application and enforcement due to political
forces, economic conditions or other events, including terrorist attacks. We cannot predict the
political or economic events that could affect immigration laws, or any restrictive impact those
events could have on obtaining or monitoring entry visas for our personnel. If we are unable to
obtain the necessary visas for personnel who need to visit our clients sites or, if such visas are
delayed, we may not be able to provide services to our clients or to continue to provide services
on a timely basis, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Currency fluctuations among the Indian rupee, the pound sterling and the US dollar could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Although substantially all of our revenue is denominated in pound sterling or US dollars, a
significant portion of our expenses (other than payments to repair centers, which are primarily
denominated in pound sterling) are incurred and paid in Indian rupees. We report our financial
results in US dollars and our results of operations would be adversely affected if the Indian rupee
appreciates against the US dollar or the pound sterling depreciates against the US dollar. The
exchange rates between the Indian rupee and the US dollar and between the pound sterling and the US
dollar have changed substantially in recent years and may fluctuate substantially in the future.
The average Indian rupee/US dollar exchange rate was approximately Rs. 44.59 per $1.00 (based on
the noon buying rate) for the period from April 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008, which
represented a depreciation of the Indian rupee of 11.1% as compared with the average exchange rate
of approximately Rs. 40.13 per $1.00 (based on the noon buying rate) in fiscal 2008, which in turn
represented an appreciation of the Indian rupee of 11.1% as compared with the average exchange rate
of approximately Rs. 45.12 per $1.00 (based on the noon buying rate) in fiscal 2007. The average
pound sterling/US dollar exchange rate was approximately £0.55 per $1.00 (based on the noon buying
rate) for the period from April 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008, which represented a depreciation
of the pound sterling of 5.6% as compared with the average exchange rate of approximately £0.50 per
$1.00 (based on the noon buying rate) in fiscal 2008, which in turn represented an appreciation of
the pound sterling of 5.7% as compared with the average exchange rate of approximately £0.53 per
$1.00 (based on the noon buying rate) in fiscal 2007.
Our results of operations may be adversely affected if the Indian rupee appreciates significantly
against the pound sterling or the US dollar or if the pound sterling depreciates against the US
dollar. We hedge a portion of our foreign currency exposures using options and forward contracts.
We cannot assure you that our hedging strategy will be successful or will mitigate our exposure to
currency risk.
51
If more stringent labor laws become applicable to us, our profitability may be adversely affected.
India has stringent labor legislation that protects the interests of workers, including legislation
that sets forth detailed procedures for dispute resolution and employee removal and legislation
that imposes financial obligations on employers upon retrenchment. Though we are exempt from a
number of these labor laws at present, there can be no assurance that such laws will not become
applicable to the business process outsourcing industry in India in the future. In addition, our
employees may in the future form unions. If these labor laws become applicable to our workers or if
our employees unionize, it may become difficult for us to maintain flexible human resource
policies, discharge employees or downsize, and our profitability may be adversely affected.
An outbreak of an infectious disease or any other serious public health concerns in Asia or
elsewhere could cause our business to suffer.
The outbreak of an infectious disease in Asia or elsewhere could have a negative impact on the
economies, financial markets and business activities in the countries in which our end markets are
located and could thereby have a material adverse effect on our business. The outbreak of SARS in
2003 in Asia and the outbreak of the avian influenza, or bird flu, across Asia, including India, as
well as Europe have adversely affected a number of countries and companies. Although we have not
been adversely impacted by these recent outbreaks, we can give no assurance that a future outbreak
of an infectious disease among humans or animals will not have a material adverse effect on our
business.
Risks Related to our ADSs
Substantial future sales of our shares or ADSs in the public market could cause our ADS price to
fall.
Sales by us or our shareholders of a substantial number of our ADSs in the public market, or the
perception that these sales could occur, could cause the market price of our ADSs to decline. These
sales, or the perception that these sales could occur, also might make it more difficult for us to
sell securities in the future at a time or at a price that we deem appropriate or pay for
acquisitions using our equity securities. As of December 31, 2008, we had 42,582,566 ordinary
shares outstanding, including 19,706,267 shares represented by 19,706,267 ADSs. In addition, as of
December 31, 2008, there were options and RSUs outstanding under our 2002 Stock Incentive Plan and
our 2006 Incentive Award Plan to purchase a total of 3,493,690 ordinary shares or ADSs. All ADSs
are freely transferable, except that ADSs owned by our affiliates, including Warburg Pincus, may
only be sold in the US if they are registered or qualify for an exemption from registration,
including pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act.
The remaining ordinary shares outstanding may be sold in the United States if they are registered
or qualify for an exemption from registration, including pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities
Act.
The market price for our ADSs may be volatile.
The market price for our ADSs is likely to be highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in
response to factors including the following:
|
|
|
announcements of technological developments; |
|
|
|
|
regulatory developments in our target markets affecting us, our clients or our
competitors; |
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly operating results; |
|
|
|
|
changes in financial estimates by securities research analysts; |
52
|
|
|
changes in the economic performance or market valuations of other companies engaged
in business process outsourcing; |
|
|
|
|
addition or loss of executive officers or key employees; |
|
|
|
|
sales or expected sales of additional shares or ADSs; and |
|
|
|
|
loss of one or more significant clients. |
In addition, securities markets generally and from time to time experience significant price and
volume fluctuations that are not related to the operating performance of particular companies.
These market fluctuations may also have a material adverse effect on the market price of our ADSs.
Holders of ADSs may be restricted in their ability to exercise voting rights.
At our request, the depositary of the ADSs will mail to you any notice of shareholders meeting
received from us together with information explaining how to instruct the depositary to exercise
the voting rights of the ordinary shares represented by ADSs. If the depositary timely receives
voting instructions from you, it will endeavor to vote the ordinary shares represented by your ADSs
in accordance with such voting instructions. However, the ability of the depositary to carry out
voting instructions may be limited by practical and legal limitations and the terms of the ordinary
shares on deposit. We cannot assure you that you will receive voting materials in time to enable
you to return voting instructions to the depositary in a timely manner. Ordinary shares for which
no voting instructions have been received will not be voted.
As a foreign private issuer, we are not subject to the SEC, proxy rules which regulate the form and
content of solicitations by US-based issuers of proxies from their shareholders. The form of notice
and proxy statement that we have been using does not include all of the information that would be
provided under the SECs proxy rules.
We may be classified as a passive foreign investment company which could result in adverse United
States federal income tax consequences to US Holders.
We do not expect to be a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for United States federal
income tax purposes for our current taxable year ending March 31, 2009. However, we must make a
separate determination each year as to whether we are a PFIC after the close of each taxable year.
A non-US corporation will be considered a PFIC for any taxable year if either (i) at least 75% of
its gross income is passive income or (ii) at least 50% of the value of its assets (based on an
average of the quarterly values of the assets during a taxable year) is attributable to assets that
produce or are held for the production of passive income. As noted in our annual report for our
taxable year ended March 31, 2007, our PFIC status in respect of our taxable year ended March 31,
2007 was uncertain. If we were treated as a PFIC for any year during which you held ADSs or
ordinary shares, we will continue to be treated as a PFIC for all succeeding years during which you
hold ADSs or ordinary shares, absent a special elections.
53
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunder duly authorized.
Date: February 5, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
WNS (HOLDINGS) LIMITED
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Alok Misra
|
|
|
Name: |
Alok Misra |
|
|
Title: |
Group Chief Financial Officer |
|
54