SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant |X| | |
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant |_| | |
Check the appropriate box: | |
|_| | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|_| | Confidential,
for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|X| | Definitive Proxy Statement |
|_| | Definitive Additional Materials |
|_| | Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-12 |
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|X| | No fee required. | |
|_| | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. | |
1. | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: | |
|
||
2. | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: | |
|
||
3. | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): | |
|
||
4. | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: | |
|
||
5. | Total fee paid: | |
|
||
|_| | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |
|_| | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. | |
1. | Amount Previously Paid: | |
2. | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: | |
3. | Filing Party: | |
4. | Date Filed: | |
Fellow Stockholders - | LETTER TO | |
STOCKHOLDERS | ||
We are pleased to present this year's annual report to you, describing what we believe has been a pivotal time in the 24-year history of Lam Research Corporation. | ||
Despite continuing challenges for the semiconductor equipment industry, the trends of our business have been unmistakably positive: | ||
· |
We posted profits in the last three quarters of the year | |
· |
We won key customer positions in the high-growth dielectric etch market | |
· |
We maintained our lead position in the silicon etch market | |
· |
We saw positive results from our innovative new business model | |
We began to change the fundamental structure of our Company in late 2001. Our outsourcing program goes well beyond typical industry practices and puts the focus of our efforts on the core of what we do as an organization. In addition to outsourcing, we have implemented strategic initiatives surrounding asset utilization and customer relationships that we believe will further our goal of increasing shareholder value. | ||
We are committed to strengthening Lam's performance in the semiconductor equipment industry, which is challenged with major product demand swings, intensive R&D requirements, a concentrated, yet global, customer base, and workers who are rightly concerned about job stability and continuity. To succeed in this environment, semiconductor equipment companies must be flexible, they must be first to anticipate customers' next-generation semiconductor process requirements, and they must be able to lessen the employment volatility that has characterized the semiconductor equipment industry for the last several years. | ||
Among our accomplishments so far: | ||
· |
Our flagship 2300 Series product line is now about 65 percent outsourced, up from less than 10 percent last year. This means that the effects of cyclical sales will be managed by our highly capable outsource providers, who can more efficiently balance the variation in sales levels with their other business lines. |
· |
Meeting the objective we outlined in our update to you last year, approximately 80 percent of Lam employees now work in our core areas of product development, marketing and sales, customer support, and supply chain management. We intend to have 85 percent of our employees focused on our core functions, which we believe will reduce the abrupt changes in our workforce that we have seen in the last several years. | |
· |
We will have cut our facility needs almost in half, to an expected 600,000 square feet by the end of 2003, in part because we are working with outsource providers for manufacturing and warehousing. This reduces our fixed costs and enables us to respond better to the manufacturing cycles in our industry. |
As a tangible sign of how these changes have affected our business, let's compare some quarterly numbers for June 2003 and June 2002:
June 2003 | June 2002 | |||
Revenue | $ 186.1 million | $ 180.3 million | ||
Gross Margin ($) | $ 77.1 million | $ 66.3 million | ||
Gross Margin (%) | 41.4% | 36.8% |
This reinforces our belief that our initiatives are working. In this quarterly comparison, a $6 million increase in revenue resulted in an $11 million increase in gross margin profitability.
In the same regard, the comparison of annual operating expenses in 2003 and 2002 includes a $29 million or 18% reduction in Selling, General and Administrative costs. As business conditions improve, we expect improved margins and better operating asset turnover compared to previous cycles.
While our new business model has enabled us to improve our financial performance, it is our continued focus on developing leading-edge products, processes, and services, that will fuel our success as we move forward. Based on the level of customer acceptance of our 2300 Series etch products and the new market positions we have won in the last year, we believe that our prospects for the future are strong.
Visibility is still limited, as our customers are maintaining conservative near-term capital investment plans. However, our business sector is the foundation of the high-tech world, and we are confident that technology will continue to develop and grow. Demand for semiconductors has increased, and there are early signs that the overcapacity that has dampened our business for the last few years is beginning to be corrected. The actions outlined above ensure that our Company is well prepared to address whatever industry conditions we may encounter. We thank you for your confidence, and we look forward to updating you on our progress.
Sincerely,
James W. Bagley
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Stephen G. Newberry
President and Chief Operating Officer
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held November 6,
2003
To the Stockholders:
1. |
to elect directors to serve for the ensuing year, and until their successors are elected; |
2. |
to approve an amendment to the Lam 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (1999 Purchase Plan) that will (a) annually increase by a specific amount the number of shares that Lam can redeem in public market or private purchases for issuance through the 1999 Purchase Plan, and (b) allow the plan administrator to set a limit on the number of shares that a participant can purchase on any single exercise date; |
3. |
to approve the Lam 2004 Executive Incentive Plan (2004 Incentive Plan); |
4. |
to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors of the Company for the fiscal year ending June 27, 2004; and |
5. |
to transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting, or any adjournment thereof. |
Fremont, California
October 10, 2003
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
In order to assure your representation at the meeting, you are requested to vote by proxy via telephone, Internet, or mail in accordance with the voting instructions on the proxy card. If you vote by mail, you should mark, sign, and date the enclosed proxy card as promptly as possible and return it in the enclosed return-addressed envelope.
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION
PROXY STATEMENT
FOR
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held
November 6, 2003
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Information
Concerning Solicitation and Voting |
1 | |||||
Proposal No.
1 Election of Directors |
3 | |||||
Corporate
Governance |
5 | |||||
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management |
7 | |||||
Director
Compensation |
8 | |||||
Executive
Compensation and Other Information |
8 | |||||
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions |
13 | |||||
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation |
13 | |||||
Report of the
Compensation Committee |
14 | |||||
Report of the
Audit Committee |
17 | |||||
Relationship
with Independent Auditors |
17 | |||||
Comparative
Stock Performance |
18 | |||||
Equity
Compensation Plan Information |
19 | |||||
Proposal No.
2 Approval of Amendment of the Lam 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
20 | |||||
Proposal No.
3 Approval of Lam 2004 Executive Incentive Plan |
27 | |||||
Proposal No.
4 Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditors |
30 | |||||
Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance |
31 | |||||
Other
Matters |
31 |
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION
PROXY STATEMENT FOR 2003 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
INFORMATION CONCERNING SOLICITATION AND VOTING
General
Record Date and Principal Share Ownership
Revocability of Proxies
Voting and Solicitation
Proposal No. 3 (approval of 2004 Executive Incentive Plan), and Proposal No. 4 (ratification of the independent auditors for the Company for the current fiscal year) will each require the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of the Companys Common Stock present or represented and entitled to vote with respect to each such matter.
Stockholder Proposals to be Included in the Companys 2004 Proxy Statement
Stockholder Proposals and Nominations to be Voted on at 2004 Annual Meeting
2
certain specified information concerning the proposal or nominee, as the case may be, and information about the proponent and the proponents ownership of Common Stock of the Company. Proposals or nominations that do not meet the requirements will not be entertained at the annual meeting. Submissions or questions should be sent to: George Schisler, Jr., Office of the Secretary, Lam Research Corporation, 4650 Cushing Parkway, Fremont, California 94538.
PROPOSAL NO. 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Nominees
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR EACH OF THE SIX NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR SET FORTH BELOW.
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the nominees, which is based on data furnished by them:
Nominees
for Director
|
Age
|
Director Since |
Principal
Occupation and Business Experience During Past Five Years |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
James
W. Bagley |
64
|
1997
|
Mr.
Bagley has been Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company
since the merger of Lam and OnTrak Systems, Inc. in August 1997. Effective
September 1, 1998, he was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors.
From June 1996 to August 1997, Mr. Bagley served as Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer of OnTrak. He was formerly Chief Operating
Officer and Vice Chairman of the Board of Applied Materials, Inc., where
he also served in other senior executive positions during his 15-year
tenure. Mr. Bagley held various management positions at Texas Instruments,
Inc., before he joined Applied Materials. Mr. Bagley is also currently
a director of Micron Technology, Inc. and Teradyne, Inc. |
3
Nominees
for Director
|
Age
|
Director Since |
Principal
Occupation and Business Experience During Past Five Years |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
David
G. Arscott(1) |
59 |
1980
|
Mr.
Arscott has been a director of the Company since 1980, and was Chairman
of the Board of Directors from 1982 to 1984. He is currently, and has
been since 1988, the president of Compass Technology Partners, an investment
management firm. From 1978 to 1988, Mr. Arscott was a Managing General
Partner of Arscott, Norton & Associates, a venture capital firm. Mr.
Arscott is also currently a director of Toolwire, Inc., and Star Vox,
Inc. |
|||||||||
Robert
M. Berdahl(2,3) |
66 |
2001
|
Dr.
Berdahl has been a director of the Company since January 2001. He is currently
Chancellor of the University of California, Berkeley, and has held that
post since 1997. From 1993 to 1997, Dr. Berdahl was President of the University
of Texas at Austin, and from 1986 to 1993, he was Vice Chancellor of Academic
Affairs of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Dr. Berdahl
is also currently a director of Internet-2. |
|||||||||
Richard
J. Elkus, Jr.(1,3) |
68 |
1997
|
Mr.
Elkus has been a director of the Company since August 1997. He is currently,
and has been since 1996, Co-Chairman of Voyan Technology. From February
1994 until April 1997, Mr. Elkus was Vice Chairman of the Board of Tencor
Instruments, Inc. From February 1994 to September 1996, Mr. Elkus was
Executive Vice President of Tencor Instruments. He is also currently a
director of KLA-Tencor Corporation, Virage Logic Corporation, and SOPRA
S.A. |
|||||||||
Jack
R. Harris(2) |
61 |
1982
|
Mr.
Harris has been a director of the Company since 1982. Mr. Harris is currently,
and since 1999 has been, Chairman of HT, Inc. and Innovative Robotics
Solutions. From 1986 until September 1999, Mr. Harris was Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer, and President of Optical Specialties, Inc. Mr. Harris
is also currently a director of L-3 ILEX Systems and Metara, Inc. |
|||||||||
Grant
M. Inman(1,3) |
61 |
1981
|
Mr.
Inman has been a director of the Company since 1981. Mr. Inman is currently
a General Partner of Inman Investment Management. From 1985 until 1998,
Mr. Inman was a General Partner of Inman & Bowman, a venture capital
investment partnership. Mr. Inman is also currently a director of Paychex,
Inc. and Wind River Systems, Inc., and a Trustee of the University of
California Berkeley Foundation. |
(1) | Member of Audit Committee. |
(2) | Member of Compensation Committee. |
(3) | Member of Nominating/Governance Committee. |
4
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
in addition to its existing Audit Committee charter, adopted charters for the Compensation Committee and Nominating/Governance Committee that address corporate governance practices in accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, current and proposed Nasdaq corporate governance guidelines, and other applicable rules and regulations; |
|
established disclosure control policies and procedures in accordance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, including a Disclosure Control Committee; |
|
established a procedure for receipt and treatment by the Audit Committee of anonymous and confidential complaints or concerns regarding audit or accounting matters; |
|
adopted a Company-wide Global Standards of Business Conduct Policy for all employees worldwide; and |
|
provided internal training of managers to enhance their abilities to manage in compliance with state and federal laws. |
|
Director Independence Independent directors shall constitute at least a majority of the Board. No non-employee director may serve as a consultant or service provider to the Company without the approval of a majority of the independent directors. |
|
Director Education Directors are expected to attend one or more training sessions or conferences to enhance their ability to fulfill their responsibilities. |
|
Monitoring Board Effectiveness From time to time, the Nominating/Governance Committee shall conduct a review of the functioning of the Board and the Board committees. In addition, the Nominating/Governance Committee shall conduct a suitability review of each director on a regular schedule. |
|
Executive Sessions of Independent Directors At least twice per year the Board will schedule regular meetings of the non-management directors without management present. |
5
|
Board Access to Independent Advisors The Board as a whole, and each of the Board committees separately, have authority to retain and terminate such independent consultants, counselors or advisors to the Board as each shall deem necessary or appropriate. |
|
Board Committees All members of each of the Companys three standing committees the Audit, Compensation and Nominating/Governance Committees are required to be independent in accordance with Nasdaq criteria. See Board Meetings and Committees below for a description of the responsibilities of the Boards standing committees. |
Board Meetings and Committees
1 | Former director Kenneth Thompson served on the Compensation Committee from April 2002 until his passing in April 2003. Since April 2003 the Committee has consisted of Messrs. Berdahl and Harris. |
2 | The Committee was renamed the Nominating/Governance Committee in September 2003 to reflect its expanded role of overseeing both the director nomination process and matters of corporate governance. |
6
Committee is also responsible for recommending the composition of Board committees for approval by the Board, reviewing and assessing the Corporate Governance Guidelines from time to time and recommending changes for approval by the Board, reviewing the functioning of the Board and its committees and reporting the evaluation to the Board, and reviewing the suitability of each director for continuing service on the Board. In August 2003, the Nominating/Governance Committee approved the nominees for director of the Company as set forth in Proposal No. 1 above. The Nominating/Governance Committee will consider for nomination persons properly nominated by stockholders. In order for the Nominating/Governance Committee to consider the nomination of a person submitted by a stockholder, such nomination must be made in accordance with the Companys by-laws and other procedures described above in the section captioned, Stockholder Proposals and Nominations to be Voted on at 2004 Annual Meeting.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN
BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
Name of Person or Entity |
Shares Beneficially Owned |
Percent of Class |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fidelity
Management & Research Co. 82 Devonshire Street Boston, Massachusetts 02109 |
14,495,734 | (1) | 11.19 | % | ||||||
Putnam
Investment Management, LLC. 1 Post Office Square Boston, Massachusetts 02109 |
11,485,076 | (1) | 8.87 | % | ||||||
Franklin
Advisors, Inc. 777 Mariners Island Blvd. San Mateo, California 94404-1585 |
9,526,835 | (1) | 7.35 | % | ||||||
James W.
Bagley |
3,473,000 | (2) | 2.68 | % | ||||||
David G.
Arscott |
226,417 | (2) | * |
|||||||
Robert M.
Berdahl |
48,000 | (2) | * |
|||||||
Richard J.
Elkus, Jr. |
134,370 | (2) | * |
|||||||
Jack R.
Harris |
186,000 | (2) | * |
|||||||
Grant M.
Inman |
273,499 | (2) | * |
|||||||
Stephen G.
Newberry |
1,485,247 | (2) | 1.15 | % | ||||||
Mercedes
Johnson |
337,974 | (2) | * |
|||||||
Nicolas J.
Bright |
458,921 | (2, 4) | * |
|||||||
Ernest
Maddock |
104,308 | (2) | * |
|||||||
All current
directors and current executive officers as a group (11 persons)(3) |
7,058,606 | (2) | 5.45 | % |
* | Less than one percent |
(1) | Holdings as of June 30, 2003, based on the stockholders
Schedule 13F filings with the SEC. |
7
(2) | Includes shares subject to outstanding options that are
currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days after September 12, 2003, with respect to: Mr. Bagley, 3,173,000 options; Mr. Arscott, 174,000
options; Dr. Berdahl, 48,000 options; Mr. Elkus, 102,000 options; Mr. Harris, 174,000 options; Mr. Inman, 156,000 options; Mr. Newberry, 1,485,247
options; Ms. Johnson, 323,900 options; Mr. Bright, 457,649 options; Mr. Steven Lindsay, 330,000 options; and Mr. Maddock, 103,850 options,
respectively. |
(3) | Current directors and current executive officers, as of
September 12, 2003, include: Mr. Bagley, Mr. Arscott, Dr. Berdahl, Mr. Elkus, Mr. Harris, Mr. Inman, Mr. Newberry, Ms. Johnson, Mr. Bright, Steven
Lindsay, and Mr. Maddock. |
(4) | Includes 240 shares held in trust for Mr. Brights dependent children. |
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION
Summary of Cash and Certain Other Compensation
8
Summary Compensation Table
Annual Compensation |
Long-Term Compensation(3) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name and Principal Position |
Year |
Salary($)(1) |
Bonus($)(1) |
Other Annual Compen- sation($)(2) |
Number of Securities Underlying Options(#) |
All Other Compen- sation($) |
||||||||||||||||||||
James W.
Bagley |
2003 | 429,883 | 1,726 | 501,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Chairman of
the Board & |
2002 | 90,006 | 283 | 1,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Chief
Executive Officer |
2001 | 97,704 | 129 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stephen G.
Newberry |
2003 | 501,635 | 33,000 | 2,823 | 285,250 | 1,292 | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||
President
& Chief |
2002 | 472,500 | 570 | 205,250 | 126,310 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating
Officer |
2001 | 487,696 | 300,000 | 528 | 126,310 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mercedes
Johnson |
2003 | 313,615 | 15,750 | 487 | 123,300 | 7,094 | (7) | |||||||||||||||||||
Sr. Vice
President, |
2002 | 282,385 | 98 | 5,300 | 6,190 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Finance,
Chief Financial |
2001 | 307,162 | 202,500 | (5) | 94 | 38,000 | (6) | 6,698 | (7) | |||||||||||||||||
Officer &
Chief |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accounting
Officer |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicolas J.
Bright |
2003 | 280,013 | 16,500 | 1,691 | 156,949 | 6,801 | (8) | |||||||||||||||||||
Sr. Vice
President & Gen. |
2002 | 245,500 | 56,726 | 336 | 356,949 | 4,379 | (8) | |||||||||||||||||||
Manager,
Global Products |
2001 | 323,790 | 161,084 | 5,164 | (8) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Ernest
Maddock |
2003 | 216,538 | 12,000 | 18 | 63,050 | 5,662 | (9) | |||||||||||||||||||
Vice
President, Global |
2002 | 190,404 | 2 | 89,750 | 5,074 | (9) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operations |
2001 | 196,947 | 166,942 | 5,121 | (9) |
(1) | Includes amounts and bonuses earned in fiscal 2003, 2002, and 2001, but deferred at the election of executive officer under the Companys deferred compensation plans and the Companys Savings Plus Plan Lam Research 401(k), a qualified defined contribution plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as amended) (401(k) Plan). |
(2) | Reflects interest earned on deferred compensation, to the extent that the interest rate exceeded 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate. |
(3) | The Company has not issued restricted stock awards in the past three fiscal years. The Company last issued restricted stock awards in June 1996. |
(4) | Includes for fiscal 2002 and 2001, $125,000 reflecting Mr. Newberrys interest in the signing bonus received at the outset of his employment with the Company and held in his deferred compensation account, which interest vested on the first anniversary of his employment with the Company. Also includes $1,292 for term life insurance premiums for 2003 and $1,310 for 2002 and 2001, respectively. |
(5) | Includes a bonus of $37,500 paid on the anniversary of Ms. Johnsons employment, and an additional bonus during fiscal 2001. |
(6) | The officer voluntarily rescinded these stock option awards in August 2001. |
(7) | Consists of the Companys matching contributions to the Companys 401(k) Plan in the amounts of $6,021 for 2003, $4,891 for 2002, and $5,388 for 2001; and Company-paid term life insurance premiums of $1,073 for 2003, $1,299 for 2002, and $1,310 for 2001. |
(8) | Consists of the Companys matching contributions to the Companys 401(k) Plan. |
(9) | Consists of the Companys matching contributions to the Companys 401(k) Plan in the amounts of $5,193 for 2003, $4,580 for 2002, and $4,580 for 2001; and Company-paid term life insurance premiums of $469 for 2003, $494 for 2002, and $541 for 2001. |
9
Stock Plans
Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year
Individual Grants |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Potential Realizable Value at Assumed Annual Rates of Stock Price Appreciation for Option Term |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name of Executive (a) |
Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) (b) |
Percent of Total Options Granted to Employees in Fiscal Year (c) |
Exercise or Base Price ($/Sh) (d) |
Expiration Date (e) |
5% (f) |
10% (g) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
James W.
Bagley(1) |
500,000 | 10.73 | % | $ | 9.67 | 10/17/2009 | $ | 1,968,331 | $ | 4,587,047 | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | .02 | % | $ | 11.66 | 10/1/2008 | $ | 4,091 | $ | 9,323 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stephen G.
Newberry(2) |
280,000 | 6.01 | % | $ | 8.69 | 10/16/2009 | $ | 990,557 | $ | 2,308,418 | |||||||||||||||||
5,250 | .11 | % | $ | 11.66 | 10/1/2008 | $ | 21,480 | $ | 48,944 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mercedes
Johnson(3) |
118,000 | 2.53 | % | $ | 8.69 | 10/16/2009 | $ | 417,449 | $ | 972,833 | |||||||||||||||||
2,000 | .04 | % | $ | 12.74 | 10/1/2008 | $ | 8,959 | $ | 20,420 | ||||||||||||||||||
3,300 | .07 | % | $ | 12.74 | 10/1/2008 | $ | 14,782 | $ | 33,693 | ||||||||||||||||||
Nicolas J.
Bright(4) |
150,000 | 3.22 | % | $ | 8.69 | 10/16/2009 | $ | 530,655 | $ | 1,236,653 | |||||||||||||||||
4,000 | .09 | % | $ | 12.74 | 12/24/2008 | $ | 18,696 | $ | 42,876 | ||||||||||||||||||
2,949 | .06 | % | $ | 11.66 | 10/01/2008 | $ | 12,065 | $ | 27,492 | ||||||||||||||||||
Ernest
Maddock(5) |
60,000 | 1.29 | % | $ | 8.69 | 10/16/2009 | $ | 212,262 | $ | 494,661 | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | .02 | % | $ | 12.74 | 12/24/2008 | $ | 4,674 | $ | 10,719 | ||||||||||||||||||
2,050 | .04 | % | $ | 11.66 | 10/1/2008 | $ | 8,387 | $ | 19,111 |
(1) | For Mr. Bagley, the 500,000-share option grant vests and becomes exercisable in 1/8 blocks per quarter from 1/17/2003 through 10/17/2004; all of the 1,000-share option grant vested and became exercisable on 10/01/2002. |
(2) | For Mr. Newberry, the 280,000-share option grant vests and becomes exercisable in 1/8 blocks per quarter from 1/17/2003 through 10/17/2004; all of the 5,250-share option grant vested and became exercisable on 10/01/2002. |
(3) | For Ms. Johnson, the 118,000-share option grant vests and becomes exercisable in 1/6 blocks per quarter from 1/17/2005 through 4/17/06; all of the 2,000-share and 3,300-share option grants vested and became exercisable on 10/01/2002. |
(4) | For Mr. Bright, the 150,000-share option grant vests and becomes exercisable in 1/8 blocks per quarter from 1/17/2003 through 10/17/2004; all of the 4,000-share option grant vested and became exercisable on 12/24/2002; and all of the 2,949-share option grant vested and became exercisable on 10/01/2002. |
(5) | For Mr. Maddock, the 60,000-share option grant vests and becomes exercisable in 1/8 blocks per quarter from 1/17/2003 through 10/17/2004; all of the 1,000-share option grant vested and became exercisable on 12/24/2002; and all of the 2,050-share option grant vested and became exercisable on 10/01/2002. |
10
Aggregated Option Exercises by Named Executives in Last Fiscal Year,
and
Fiscal Year-End Option Values
No. of Unexercised Options at Fiscal Year-End |
Value of Unexercised In-The-Money Options at Fiscal Year-End(2) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name of Executive |
No. of Shares Acquired on Exercise |
Value Realized($)(1) |
Exercisable |
Unexercisable |
Exercisable |
Unexercisable |
|||||||||||||||||||||
James W.
Bagley |
0 | $ | 0 | 2,809,500 | 2,045,500 | $ | 17,997,775 | $ | 22,732,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stephen G.
Newberry |
0 | $ | 0 | 1,415,247 | 1,025,253 | $ | 14,441,199 | $ | 2,129,981 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mercedes
Johnson |
0 | $ | 0 | 323,900 | 164,550 | $ | 3,625,887 | $ | 1,522,965 | ||||||||||||||||||
Nicolas J.
Bright |
0 | $ | 0 | 420,149 | 481,249 | $ | 3,864,192 | $ | 1,358,322 | ||||||||||||||||||
Ernest
Maddock |
0 | $ | 0 | 88,850 | 134,450 | $ | 888,623 | $ | 448,641 |
(1) | Market value of underlying securities at exercise, minus the exercise price. |
(2) | Market value of underlying securities at fiscal year-end, minus the exercise price. |
Employment and Termination Agreements,
Change of Control Arrangements, and
Retirement Benefits
Employment Agreement with James W. Bagley
Employment Agreement with Stephen G. Newberry
11
Employment Agreement with Mercedes Johnson
Employment Agreement with Nicolas J. Bright
Employment Agreement with Ernest Maddock
12
recommended by the Companys Chief Executive Officer and as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.
Change of Control Arrangements
Retirement Medical and Dental Benefits
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Loan to Stephen G. Newberry
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
13
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Compensation Policies
Compensation Components
Base Salary
Annual Incentives
14
are met and compensation is granted under the plan, that compensation would be tax-deductible to the Company. Lam has not previously made any payments under its existing plan and it does not expect the likelihood of incentive compensation payments, if any, to increase, solely as a result of the adoption of the proposed 2004 Executive Incentive Plan. See Proposal No. 3 Approval of Lam 2004 Executive Incentive Plan for more information.
Long-Term Incentives
Compensation of Chief Executive Officer
15
terms of a new employment agreement. In the interim, in October 2002 the Board set Mr. Bagleys base salary at an annualized rate of $650,000. Mr. Bagley is entitled to participate in the Companys incentive bonus programs available to other senior executives. In addition, in October 2002 Mr. Bagley was granted an option to purchase 500,000 shares of the Companys Common Stock.
Effect of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code
16
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
|
reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with Company management; |
|
discussed with Ernst & Young LLP, the Companys independent auditors, the matters required to be discussed by Statement of Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication with Audit Committees, as amended by Statement of Auditing Standards No. 90, Audit Committee Communications; |
|
reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young LLP, required by the Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions with Audit Committees, discussed with the auditors their independence, and concluded that the non-audit services performed by Ernst & Young LLP are compatible with maintaining their independence; |
|
based on the foregoing reviews and discussions, recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Companys 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 29, 2003, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission; and |
|
instructed the independent auditors that the Committee expects to be advised if there are any subjects that require special attention. |
RELATIONSHIP WITH INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Audit Fees & Fees for Non-Audit Services
17
Fees for Financial Information Systems Design & Implementation
COMPARATIVE STOCK PERFORMANCE
Lam Research Corporation
Nasdaq Composite Index
Smith Barney
Semiconductor Equipment Index
18
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
Plan Category |
Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants, and Rights(1)(2) |
Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants, and Rights |
Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) |
(b) |
(c) |
||||||||||||
Equity
compensation plans approved by security holders(3) |
9,854,646 | $ | 12.69 | 2,426,151 | (4) | |||||||||
Equity
compensation plans not approved by security holders(5) |
18,883,562 | $ | 18.70 | 3,333,213 | ||||||||||
Total |
28,738,208 | $ | 16.64 | 5,759,364 |
(1) | Does not include 15,687 issued shares of restricted stock with a weighted average price at issue of $6.38 per share, which were issued under the 1996 Performance-Based Restricted Stock Plan. |
(2) | Does not include options that Lam assumed under the OnTrak Systems, Inc.s (OnTrak) stock option plans pursuant to the merger of OnTrak into Lam. After giving effect to the exchange ratio provided in the merger, stock options exercisable for 1,947,900 shares of Lam common stock remain outstanding. These options have a weighted average exercise price of $6.93 per share. Following the merger, no further awards have been or will be made under the OnTrak Plans. |
(3) | Includes shares issuable under the Companys 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the 1997 Plan). The 1997 Plan was adopted by the Board in May 1997 and approved by the stockholders of the Company in August 1997. In October 2002, the Board amended the 1997 Plan to provide for the issuance of restricted stock unit awards, allow all 1997 Plan participants to participate in exchanges of stock options previously permitted under the 1997 Plan, and provide that vesting of restricted stock, deferred stock, performance share and restricted stock unit awards would be determined by the Administrator of the Plan at the time of the award grant. |
(4) | Includes 2,162,272 shares available for future issuance under the ESPP. This number does not include shares that may be added to the ESPP share reserve if stockholders approve the amendment to the ESPP pursuant to Proposal No. 2 herein. |
(5) | Includes shares issuable under the Companys 1999 Stock Option Plan (the 1999 Option Plan). The 1999 Option Plan reserves for issuance up to 27,500,000 shares of the Companys Common Stock and is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board (the Administrator). |
19
PROPOSAL NO. 2
APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT OF
LAM 1999 EMPLOYEE STOCK
PURCHASE PLAN
* | This tabulation of the number of shares available under the Plan has been adjusted to reflect Lams three-for-one split of its Common Stock in March 2000. |
20
number of shares currently reserved thereunder for issuance, the addition of shares to the Plan reserve is necessary so that the 1999 Purchase Plan can continue to provide a sufficient mechanism, through the ability to purchase Lam Common Stock, to compensate employees and provide appropriate long-term incentives for continued employment.
DESCRIPTION OF THE AMENDMENT
|
Adds a provision for an automatic annual increase by a specific amount to the number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the Plan on a one-for-one basis with shares that the Company redeems through public market and private purchases for such purpose; and |
|
Allows the Plan Administrator to place a limit on the number of shares of Common Stock that a participant can purchase on a single exercise date under the Plan. |
21
DESCRIPTION OF THE 1999 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
Purpose
Plan Administration
Securities Subject to Plan
Eligibility and Participation
22
deductions, or at such other time as may be determined by the Board. An employee who becomes eligible to participate in the 1999 Purchase Plan after the commencement of an offering period may participate on an interim basis until commencement of the next offering period.
Offering Periods and Dates
Payroll Deductions
Purchase of Stock; Exercise of Purchase Right
Purchase Price of Lam Common Stock; Taxes on the Acquisition or Disposition of Stock
23
purchase date. On September 12, 2003, the closing market price of Lam Common Stock was $25.18, as reported by The Nasdaq National Market.
Ability of the Board or Plan Administrator to Amend the 1999 Purchase Plan
Term and Termination of Plan
Withdrawal
Termination of Employment
24
Capital Changes
Nonassignability
Reports
CERTAIN UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX INFORMATION
25
RESTRICTION ON RESALE
1999 Employee Stock Purchase Benefits
Name and Position |
Number of Shares |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
James W.
Bagley, Chairman of the Board & Chief Executive Officer |
0 | |||||
Stephen G.
Newberry, President & Chief Operating Officer |
0 | |||||
Mercedes
Johnson, Sr. Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer & Chief Accounting Officer |
1,598 | |||||
Nicolas J.
Bright, Sr. Vice President & Gen. Manager, Global Products |
0 | |||||
Ernest
Maddock, Vice President, Global Operations |
435 | |||||
Executive
Group(1) |
2,791 | |||||
Non-Executive
Director Group(2) |
0 | |||||
Non-Executive
Officer Employee Group(3) |
1,255,049 |
(1) | Consists of Mr. Bagley, Mr. Newberry, Ms. Johnson, Mr. Bright, Mr. Maddock, and Mr. Lindsay. |
(2) | Consists of all members of the Board of Directors except Mr. Bagley. |
(3) | Consists of all participating employees except those listed in the Executive Group. |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT OF THE LAM 1999 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN.
26
PROPOSAL NO. 3
APPROVAL OF LAM 2004 EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE
PLAN
DESCRIPTION OF THE 2004 EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PLAN
27
Company. The Compensation Committee also determines the business criteria, performance goals and incentive compensation formula (generally including a target incentive compensation amount for each participant) that will be used to determine the cash incentive amount, if any, earned by each participant for the incentive payment measurement period. The Compensation Committee makes these determinations no later than 90 days after the beginning of the incentive payment measurement period, on or before 25% of the measurement period has elapsed and while the outcome is substantially uncertain. The Compensation Committee also determines the incentive compensation amount to be paid to each participant based on the attainment of the previously established performance goals. The Compensation Committees determinations are final and binding on all participants.
BUSINESS CRITERIA ON WHICH PERFORMANCE GOALS MAY BE BASED
|
Return on equity, total capital or assets. |
|
Growth of revenue, operating income or net income (with or without regard to impairment of goodwill). |
|
Efficiency ratio (other expense as a percentage of other income plus net interest income), with or without regard to impairment of goodwill. |
|
Net operating expense (other income less other expense) with or without regard to impairment of goodwill. |
|
Net income or operating income with or without regard to impairment of goodwill, in aggregate or per share. |
|
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). |
|
Free cash flow generation. |
|
Ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets. |
|
Customer service. |
|
Individually designed goals and objectives that are consistent with the participants specific duties and responsibilities and that are designed to improve the financial performance of the Company or a specific division or affiliate. The goals and objectives shall also be derived from and consistent with the operating plan of the Company, division or affiliate for the particular year to which the participants performance is measured. |
28
ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PLAN
2004 Executive Incentive Plan Benefits
29
Name and Position |
Dollar Value |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
James W.
Bagley, Chairman of the Board & Chief Executive Officer |
(1 | ) | ||||
Stephen G.
Newberry, President & Chief Operating Officer |
(1 | ) | ||||
Mercedes
Johnson, Sr. Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer & Chief Accounting Officer |
(1 | ) | ||||
Nicolas J.
Bright, Sr. Vice President & Gen. Manager, Global Products |
(1 | ) | ||||
Ernest
Maddock, Vice President, Global Operations |
(1 | ) | ||||
Executive
Group |
(1 | ) | ||||
Non-Executive
Director Group |
(2 | ) | ||||
Non-Executive
Officer Employee Group |
(3 | ) |
(1) | Amount of incentive compensation payable during fiscal 2004 is not determinable at this time. |
(2) | Non-executive directors are not eligible to participate in the Executive Incentive Plan. |
(3) | Non-executive officer employees are not eligible to participate in the Executive Incentive Plan. |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE 2004 EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PLAN.
PROPOSAL NO. 4
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS
30
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
OTHER MATTERS
Fremont, California
Dated: October 10, 2003
31
APPENDIX A
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION
1999 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
Amended and
Restated Effective as of November 6, 2003
1. Purpose.
2. Definitions.
A-1
3. Eligibility.
4. Offering Periods.
5. Participation.
A-2
Administrator may specify from time to time.
6. Payroll Deductions.
7. Purchase Rights.
(i) |
The per-share price of the shares subject to a Purchase Right shall be 85% of the lower of the fair market values of a share of Common Stock on (a) the Offering Date, or Interim Offering Date, on which the Purchase Right was granted and (b) the Exercise Date. The fair market value of the Common Stock on a given date shall be the closing price as reported in the Wall Street Journal; provided, however, that if there is no public trading of the Common Stock on that date, then fair market value shall be determined by the Administrator in its discretion. |
(ii) |
Payment for shares purchased by exercise of Purchase Rights shall be made only through payroll deductions in accordance with Section 6 of this Plan. |
(iii) |
Upon purchase or disposition of shares acquired by exercise of a Purchase Right, the Participant shall pay, or make provision adequate to the Administrator for payment of, all tax (and similar) withholdings that the Administrator determines, in its discretion, are required due to the acquisition or disposition, including without limitation any such withholding that the Administrator determines |
A-3
in its discretion is necessary to allow the Company and its Subsidiaries to claim tax deductions or other benefits in connection with the acquisition or disposition.
(iv) |
During his or her lifetime, a Participants Purchase Right is exercisable only by the Participant. |
(v) |
The Purchase Rights will in all respects be subject to the terms and conditions of this Plan, as interpreted by the Administrator from time to time. |
8. Exercise Dates; Purchase of Shares; Refund of Excess Cash.
9. Limitations on Shares to be Purchased.
10. Registration and Delivery of Share Certificates.
11. Withdrawal; Termination of Employment.
A-4
12. Use of Funds; No Interest.
13. Number of Shares Reserved.
(i) |
3,000,000* shares may be issued at any time before termination of this Plan from the number of authorized and previously unissued shares of Common Stock of the Company; and |
(ii) |
an additional share (up to a total of 6,000,000* additional shares) may be issued for each share of Common Stock that the Company redeems, in public-market or private purchases, and designates for this purpose after the date of Board approval of this Plan. |
14. Administration.
15. Designation of Beneficiary.
* | Number has been adjusted to account for Lams March 2000 three-for-one stock split. |
** | Provision added to Plan pursuant to November 2003 amendment and restatement. Therefore, no adjustment for March 2000 stock split required. This number is, however, subject to adjustment upon future changes to capitalization pursuant to Section 18. |
A-5
16. Transferability.
17. Reports.
18. Adjustments upon Changes in Capitalization.
A-6
reorganizations, recapitalizations, rights offerings, or other increases or reductions of shares of its outstanding Common Stock, or if the Company consolidates with or merges into any other corporation.
19. Amendment or Termination.
(i) |
Increase the number of shares that may be issued under this Plan; |
(ii) |
Change the designation of the employees (or class of employees) eligible for participation in this Plan; or |
(iii) |
If the Company has a class of equity securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), at the time of such amendment, materially increase the benefits that may accrue to Participants under this Plan. |
20. Notices.
21. Stockholder Approval.
(i) |
furnish in writing to the holders entitled to vote for this Plan substantially the same information that would be required (if proxies to be voted with respect to approval or disapproval of this Plan or amendment were then being solicited) by the rules and regulations in effect under Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act at the time such information is furnished; and |
(ii) |
file with, or mail for filing to, the Securities and Exchange Commission four copies of the written information referred to in subsection (i) hereof not later than the date on which such information is first sent or given to stockholders. |
22. Conditions upon Issuance of Shares.
A-7
Act of 1934, as amended, the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and the requirements of any stock exchange upon which the shares may then be listed, and shall be further subject to the approval of counsel for the Company with respect to such compliance.
23. Term of Plan.
24. Additional Restrictions of Rule 16b-3.
A-8
APPENDIX B
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION
2004 EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PLAN
Effective as of
December 29, 2003
1. Purpose.
2. Administration.
3. Stockholder Approval.
4. Participants.
B-1
5. Business Criteria on Which Performance Goals Shall be Based.
|
Efficiency ratio (other expense as a percentage of other income plus net interest income), with or without regard to impairment of goodwill. |
|
Individually designed goals and objectives that are consistent with the participants specific duties and responsibilities and that are designed to improve the financial performance of the Company or a specific division or affiliate. The goals and objectives shall also be derived from and consistent with the operating plan of the Company, division or affiliate for the particular year to which the participants performance is measured. |
6. Establishing Performance Goals.
(d) |
any special adjustments that will be applied in calculating whether the performance targets have been met to factor out extraordinary items; |
(e) |
the formula for calculating compensation eligible for payment under the Plan in relation to the performance targets; |
B-2
this paragraph, a Triggering Acquisition means an acquisition (or combination of acquisitions) in which the acquired entitys operating earnings (earnings before transaction-related expense) for the four quarters completed immediately before consummation of the acquisition is equal to 10% or more of the pro-forma operating earnings for the same four quarters for the combination of the Company and its affiliates and the acquired entity. (If either the Company and its affiliates or the entity being acquired had consummated other acquisitions during the four quarters in question, the calculation described in the prior sentence shall be done using pro-forma earnings for each combined entity.)
7. Determination of Attainment of Performance Goals.
8. Amendments.
9. Effectiveness; Prior Plans Superseded.
B-3
C/O LEGAL DEPARTMENT |
VOTE BY INTERNET www.proxyvote.com VOTE BY PHONE 1-800-690-6903 VOTE BY MAIL |
|
|
|
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
LAM RESEARCH CORP.
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON
BEHALF OF THE BOARD
OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY.
Vote On Directors |
For |
Withhold |
For All |
To withhold authority to vote, mark
For All Except |
Vote On Proposals 2. Proposal to Approve Amendment of Lam 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. |
For |
Against |
Abstain |
3. Proposal to Approve the Lam 2004 Executive Incentive Plan. |
/ / |
/ / |
/ / |
4. Proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent auditors of the Company for the fiscal year 2004. |
/ / |
/ / |
/ / |
(This Proxy should be marked, dated and signed by the stockholder(s) exactly as his or her name appears hereon, and returned promptly in the enclosed envelope. Persons signing in a fiduciary capacity should so indicate. If shares are held by joint tenants or as community property, all such stockholders should sign.)
For
address changes and/or comments, please Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting. |
/ / / / /
/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
OF
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION
IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE
2003 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON
NOVEMBER 6, 2003
The undersigned stockholder of LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement, each dated October 6, 2003, and the 2003 Annual Report to Stockholders, and hereby appoints James W. Bagley and George M. Schisler, Jr., or either of them, proxy holders and attorneys-in-fact, with full power to each of substitution, on behalf and in the name of the undersigned, to represent the undersigned at the 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION to be held on Thursday, November 6, 2003 at 11:00 a.m. local time, at the principal executive offices of the Company at 4650 Cushing Parkway, Fremont, California 94538, and for any adjournment or adjournments thereof, and to vote all shares of Common Stock which the undersigned would be entitled to vote if then and there personally present, on the matters set forth below and, in their discretion, upon such other matter or matters which may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or adjournments thereof.
THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO CONTRARY DIRECTION IS INDICATED, WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS, FOR APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT OF THE LAM 1999 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN, FOR APPROVAL OF THE LAM 2004 EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PLAN, FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR AND, AS SAID PROXY HOLDERS DEEM ADVISABLE, ON SUCH OTHER MATTER OR MATTERS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING.
|
Address Changes/Comments:
|
(If you noted any address changes/comments above, please mark corresponding box on other side.)
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE PROXY CARD PROMPTLY, USING THE ENCLOSED RETURN-ADDRESSED AND POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE.
(CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE)
|