SEP-2015.06.30 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
| |
ý | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2015
or
|
| |
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-33556
SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
| | |
Delaware | | 41-2232463 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
5400 Westheimer Court
Houston, Texas 77056
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
713-627-5400
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ý Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No ý
At June 30, 2015, there were 298,290,611 Common Units and 6,087,563 General Partner Units outstanding.
SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
June 30, 2015
INDEX
|
| | |
| | |
| | Page |
| |
| | |
Item 1. | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Item 2. | | |
| | |
Item 3. | | |
| | |
Item 4. | | |
| |
| |
| | |
Item 1. | | |
| | |
Item 1A. | | |
| | |
Item 6. | | |
| | |
| | |
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
This document includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements represent management’s intentions, plans, expectations, assumptions and beliefs about future events. These forward-looking statements are identified by terms and phrases such as: anticipate, believe, intend, estimate, expect, continue, should, could, may, plan, project, predict, will, potential, forecast, and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside our control and could cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements. Factors used to develop these forward-looking statements and that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated in any forward-looking statement include, but are not limited to:
| |
• | state, provincial, federal and foreign legislative and regulatory initiatives that affect cost and investment recovery, have an effect on rate structure, and affect the speed at and degree to which competition enters the natural gas and oil industries; |
| |
• | outcomes of litigation and regulatory investigations, proceedings or inquiries; |
| |
• | weather and other natural phenomena, including the economic, operational and other effects of hurricanes and storms; |
| |
• | the timing and extent of changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates; |
| |
• | general economic conditions, including the risk of a prolonged economic slowdown or decline, or the risk of delay in a recovery, which can affect the long-term demand for natural gas and oil and related services; |
| |
• | potential effects arising from terrorist attacks and any consequential or other hostilities; |
| |
• | changes in environmental, safety and other laws and regulations; |
| |
• | the development of alternative energy resources; |
| |
• | results and costs of financing efforts, including the ability to obtain financing on favorable terms, which can be affected by various factors, including credit ratings and general market and economic conditions; |
| |
• | increases in the cost of goods and services required to complete capital projects; |
| |
• | growth in opportunities, including the timing and success of efforts to develop U.S. and Canadian pipeline, storage, gathering and other related infrastructure projects and the effects of competition; |
| |
• | the performance of natural gas transmission, storage and gathering facilities, and crude oil transportation and storage; |
| |
• | the extent of success in connecting natural gas and oil supplies to transmission and gathering systems and in connecting to expanding gas and oil markets; |
| |
• | the effects of accounting pronouncements issued periodically by accounting standard-setting bodies; |
| |
• | conditions of the capital markets during the periods covered by forward-looking statements; and |
| |
• | the ability to successfully complete merger, acquisition or divestiture plans; regulatory or other limitations imposed as a result of a merger, acquisition or divestiture; and the success of the business following a merger, acquisition or divestiture. |
In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the events described in the forward-looking statements might not occur or might occur to a different extent or at a different time than Spectra Energy Partners, LP has described. Spectra Energy Partners, LP undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In millions, except per-unit amounts)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2015 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
Operating Revenues | | | | | | | |
Transportation of natural gas | $ | 454 |
| | $ | 402 |
| | $ | 918 |
| | $ | 828 |
|
Transportation of crude oil | 90 |
| | 70 |
| | 174 |
| | 141 |
|
Storage of natural gas and other | 59 |
| | 59 |
| | 117 |
| | 143 |
|
Total operating revenues | 603 |
| | 531 |
| | 1,209 |
| | 1,112 |
|
Operating Expenses | | | | | | | |
Operating, maintenance and other | 178 |
| | 166 |
| | 359 |
| | 322 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 73 |
| | 70 |
| | 146 |
| | 143 |
|
Property and other taxes | 30 |
| | 46 |
| | 71 |
| | 90 |
|
Total operating expenses | 281 |
| | 282 |
| | 576 |
| | 555 |
|
Operating Income | 322 |
| | 249 |
| | 633 |
| | 557 |
|
Other Income and Expenses | | | | | | | |
Earnings from equity investments | 45 |
| | 29 |
| | 85 |
| | 57 |
|
Other income and expenses, net | 17 |
| | 6 |
| | 26 |
| | 9 |
|
Total other income and expenses | 62 |
| | 35 |
| | 111 |
| | 66 |
|
Interest Expense | 63 |
| | 62 |
| | 120 |
| | 129 |
|
Earnings Before Income Taxes | 321 |
| | 222 |
| | 624 |
| | 494 |
|
Income Tax Expense | 5 |
| | 2 |
| | 7 |
| | 28 |
|
Net Income | 316 |
| | 220 |
| | 617 |
| | 466 |
|
Net Income—Noncontrolling Interests | 9 |
| | 5 |
| | 17 |
| | 9 |
|
Net Income—Controlling Interests | $ | 307 |
| | $ | 215 |
| | $ | 600 |
| | $ | 457 |
|
Calculation of Limited Partners’ Interest in Net Income: | | | | | | | |
Net income—Controlling Interests | $ | 307 |
| | $ | 215 |
| | $ | 600 |
| | $ | 457 |
|
Less: General partner’s interest in net income | 61 |
| | 45 |
| | 118 |
| | 87 |
|
Limited partners’ interest in net income | $ | 246 |
| | $ | 170 |
| | $ | 482 |
| | $ | 370 |
|
Weighted-average limited partner units outstanding—basic and diluted | 296 |
| | 286 |
| | 296 |
| | 285 |
|
Net income per limited partner unit—basic and diluted | $ | 0.83 |
| | $ | 0.59 |
| | $ | 1.63 |
| | $ | 1.30 |
|
Distributions paid per limited partner unit | $ | 0.60125 |
| | $ | 0.55625 |
| | $ | 1.1900 |
| | $ | 1.1025 |
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
(In millions)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
Net Income | | $ | 316 |
| | $ | 220 |
| | $ | 617 |
| | $ | 466 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | | 2 |
| | 6 |
| | (13 | ) | | 1 |
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss) | | 2 |
| | 6 |
| | (13 | ) | | 1 |
|
Total Comprehensive Income | | 318 |
| | 226 |
| | 604 |
| | 467 |
|
Less: Comprehensive Income—Noncontrolling Interests | | 9 |
| | 5 |
| | 17 |
| | 9 |
|
Comprehensive Income—Controlling Interests | | $ | 309 |
| | $ | 221 |
| | $ | 587 |
| | $ | 458 |
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In millions)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2015 | | December 31, 2014 |
ASSETS | | | | |
Current Assets | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 167 |
| | $ | 140 |
|
Receivables, net | | 274 |
| | 306 |
|
Inventory | | 41 |
| | 42 |
|
Fuel tracker | | 57 |
| | 44 |
|
Other | | 25 |
| | 23 |
|
Total current assets | | 564 |
| | 555 |
|
Investments and Other Assets | | | | |
Investments in and loans to unconsolidated affiliates | | 1,575 |
| | 1,589 |
|
Goodwill | | 3,239 |
| | 3,244 |
|
Other | | 12 |
| | 8 |
|
Total investments and other assets | | 4,826 |
| | 4,841 |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment | | | | |
Cost | | 16,210 |
| | 15,594 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | | 3,575 |
| | 3,459 |
|
Net property, plant and equipment | | 12,635 |
| | 12,135 |
|
Regulatory Assets and Deferred Debits | | 285 |
| | 262 |
|
Total Assets | | $ | 18,310 |
| | $ | 17,793 |
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In millions) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2015 | | December 31, 2014 |
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | | | | |
Current Liabilities | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 277 |
| | $ | 246 |
|
Commercial paper | | 38 |
| | 907 |
|
Taxes accrued | | 64 |
| | 63 |
|
Interest accrued | | 72 |
| | 60 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt | | 287 |
| | 36 |
|
Other | | 118 |
| | 170 |
|
Total current liabilities | | 856 |
| | 1,482 |
|
Long-term Debt | | 5,877 |
| | 5,149 |
|
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities | | | | |
Deferred income taxes | | 40 |
| | 37 |
|
Regulatory and other | | 112 |
| | 119 |
|
Total deferred credits and other liabilities | | 152 |
| | 156 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies | |
|
| |
|
|
Equity | | | | |
Partners’ Capital | | | | |
Common units (298.3 million and 294.7 million units issued and outstanding at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively) | | 10,785 |
| | 10,474 |
|
General partner units (6.1 million and 6.0 million units issued and outstanding at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively) | | 312 |
| | 284 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | (33 | ) | | (20 | ) |
Total partners’ capital | | 11,064 |
| | 10,738 |
|
Noncontrolling interests | | 361 |
| | 268 |
|
Total equity | | 11,425 |
| | 11,006 |
|
Total Liabilities and Equity | | $ | 18,310 |
| | $ | 17,793 |
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In millions)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 617 |
| | $ | 466 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 150 |
| | 148 |
|
Deferred income tax expense | | 2 |
| | 25 |
|
Earnings from equity investments | | (85 | ) | | (57 | ) |
Distributions received from unconsolidated affiliates | | 93 |
| | 56 |
|
Other | | (46 | ) | | (35 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | 731 |
| | 603 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | |
Capital expenditures | | (604 | ) | | (414 | ) |
Investments in and loans to unconsolidated affiliates | | (34 | ) | | (30 | ) |
Purchases of held-to-maturity securities | | (22 | ) | | (22 | ) |
Proceeds from sales and maturities of held-to-maturity securities | | 22 |
| | 21 |
|
Distributions received from unconsolidated affiliates | | 35 |
| | 142 |
|
Other | | — |
| | 15 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities | | (603 | ) | | (288 | ) |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | |
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt | | 994 |
| | — |
|
Payments for the redemption of long-term debt | | (16 | ) | | (427 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) in commercial paper | | (869 | ) | | 211 |
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interests | | (16 | ) | | (11 | ) |
Contributions from noncontrolling interests | | 90 |
| | 112 |
|
Proceeds from the issuances of units | | 184 |
| | 195 |
|
Distributions to partners | | (459 | ) | | (393 | ) |
Other | | (9 | ) | | — |
|
Net cash used in financing activities | | (101 | ) | | (313 | ) |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | | 27 |
| | 2 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | 140 |
| | 121 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 167 |
| | $ | 123 |
|
Supplemental Disclosures | | | | |
Property, plant and equipment non-cash accruals | | $ | 135 |
| | $ | 84 |
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
8
SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(Unaudited)
(In millions)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Partners’ Capital | | Noncontrolling Interests | | Total |
| Common | | General Partner | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
December 31, 2014 | $ | 10,474 |
| | $ | 284 |
| | $ | (20 | ) | | $ | 268 |
| | $ | 11,006 |
|
Net income | 482 |
| | 118 |
| | — |
| | 17 |
| | 617 |
|
Other comprehensive loss | — |
| | — |
| | (13 | ) | | — |
| | (13 | ) |
Attributed deferred tax benefit | — |
| | 14 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | 16 |
|
Issuances of units | 180 |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 184 |
|
Distributions to partners | (351 | ) | | (108 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (459 | ) |
Contributions from noncontrolling interests | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 90 |
| | 90 |
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interests | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (16 | ) | | (16 | ) |
June 30, 2015 | $ | 10,785 |
| | $ | 312 |
| | $ | (33 | ) | | $ | 361 |
| | $ | 11,425 |
|
December 31, 2013 | $ | 9,778 |
| | $ | 241 |
| | $ | (5 | ) | | $ | 127 |
| | $ | 10,141 |
|
Net income | 370 |
| | 87 |
| | — |
| | 9 |
| | 466 |
|
Other comprehensive income | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
Adjustment to purchase price under net acquired assets from dropdowns | 28 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 28 |
|
Attributed deferred tax benefit | — |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3 |
|
Issuances of units | 191 |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 195 |
|
Distributions to partners | (314 | ) | | (79 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (393 | ) |
Contributions from noncontrolling interests | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 112 |
| | 112 |
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interests | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (11 | ) | | (11 | ) |
Other, net | (3 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (3 | ) |
June 30, 2014 | $ | 10,050 |
| | $ | 256 |
| | $ | (4 | ) | | $ | 237 |
| | $ | 10,539 |
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
9
SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. General
The terms “we,” “our,” “us” and “Spectra Energy Partners” as used in this report refer collectively to Spectra Energy Partners, LP and its subsidiaries unless the context suggests otherwise. These terms are used for convenience only and are not intended as a precise description of any separate legal entity within Spectra Energy Partners.
Nature of Operations. Spectra Energy Partners, through its subsidiaries and equity affiliates, is engaged in the transmission, storage and gathering of natural gas, the transportation and storage of crude oil, and the transportation of natural gas liquids (NGLs) through interstate pipeline systems. We are a Delaware master limited partnership. As of June 30, 2015, Spectra Energy Corp (Spectra Energy) and its subsidiaries collectively owned 81% of us and the remaining 19% was publicly owned.
Basis of Presentation. The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include our accounts and the accounts of our majority-owned subsidiaries, after eliminating intercompany transactions and balances. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2014, and reflect all normal recurring adjustments that are, in our opinion, necessary to fairly present our results of operations and financial position. Amounts reported in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations are not necessarily indicative of amounts expected for the respective annual periods.
Spectra Energy and its affiliates are solely responsible for providing the employees and other personnel necessary to conduct our operations. Our costs of doing business have been reflected in our financial accounting records for the periods presented. These costs include direct charges and allocations from Spectra Energy and its affiliates for business services, such as payroll, accounts payable and facilities management; corporate services, such as finance and accounting, legal, human resources, investor relations, public and regulatory policy, and senior executives; and pension and other post-retirement benefit costs.
Use of Estimates. To conform with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States, we make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Although these estimates are based on our best available knowledge at the time, actual results could differ.
2. Business Segments
We manage our business in two reportable segments: U.S. Transmission and Liquids. The remainder of our business operations is presented as “Other,” and consists of certain corporate costs.
Our chief operating decision maker regularly reviews financial information about both segments in deciding how to allocate resources and evaluate performance. There is no aggregation of segments within our reportable business segments.
The U.S. Transmission segment provides interstate transmission and storage of natural gas. Substantially all of our operations are subject to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the Department of Transportation’s (DOT’s) rules and regulations. Our investments in Gulfstream Natural Gas System, LLC (Gulfstream), Southeast Supply Header, LLC (SESH) and Steckman Ridge, LP (Steckman Ridge) are included in U.S. Transmission.
The Liquids segment provides transportation of crude oil and NGLs. These operations are primarily subject to the rules and regulations of the FERC, the DOT and the National Energy Board (NEB). The Express-Platte pipeline system (Express-Platte) and our investments in DCP Sand Hills Pipeline, LLC (Sand Hills) and DCP Southern Hills Pipeline, LLC (Southern Hills) are included in Liquids.
Our reportable segments offer different products and services and are managed separately as business units. Management evaluates segment performance based on earnings from continuing operations before interest, taxes, and depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments are managed centrally, so the associated gains and losses from foreign currency remeasurement, and interest and dividend income are excluded from the segments’ EBITDA. Our segment EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies because other companies may not calculate EBITDA in the same manner.
Business Segment Data |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations | Total Operating Revenues | | Depreciation and Amortization | | Segment EBITDA/Consolidated Earnings Before Income Taxes |
| (in millions) |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 | | | | | |
U.S. Transmission | $ | 509 |
| | $ | 65 |
| | $ | 396 |
|
Liquids | 94 |
| | 8 |
| | 78 |
|
Total reportable segments | 603 |
| | 73 |
| | 474 |
|
Other | — |
| | — |
| | (18 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | — |
| | — |
| | 73 |
|
Interest expense | — |
| | — |
| | 63 |
|
Interest income and other | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
Total consolidated | $ | 603 |
| | $ | 73 |
| | $ | 321 |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 | | | | | |
U.S. Transmission | $ | 454 |
| | $ | 63 |
| | $ | 320 |
|
Liquids | 77 |
| | 7 |
| | 51 |
|
Total reportable segments | 531 |
| | 70 |
| | 371 |
|
Other | — |
| | — |
| | (18 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | — |
| | — |
| | 70 |
|
Interest expense | — |
| | — |
| | 62 |
|
Interest income and other | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
Total consolidated | $ | 531 |
| | $ | 70 |
| | $ | 222 |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 | | | | | |
U.S. Transmission | $ | 1,031 |
| | $ | 130 |
| | $ | 785 |
|
Liquids | 178 |
| | 16 |
| | 142 |
|
Total reportable segments | 1,209 |
| | 146 |
| | 927 |
|
Other | — |
| | — |
| | (35 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | — |
| | — |
| | 146 |
|
Interest expense | — |
| | — |
| | 120 |
|
Interest income and other | — |
| | — |
| | (2 | ) |
Total consolidated | $ | 1,209 |
| | $ | 146 |
| | $ | 624 |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 | | | | | |
U.S. Transmission | $ | 954 |
| | $ | 128 |
| | $ | 694 |
|
Liquids | 158 |
| | 15 |
| | 109 |
|
Total reportable segments | 1,112 |
| | 143 |
| | 803 |
|
Other | — |
| | — |
| | (37 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | — |
| | — |
| | 143 |
|
Interest expense | — |
| | — |
| | 129 |
|
Interest income and other | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Total consolidated | $ | 1,112 |
| | $ | 143 |
| | $ | 494 |
|
3. Net Income Per Limited Partner Unit and Cash Distributions
The following table presents our net income per limited partner unit calculations:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (in millions, except per unit amounts) |
Net income—controlling interests | | $ | 307 |
| | $ | 215 |
| | $ | 600 |
| | $ | 457 |
|
Less: | | | | | | | | |
General partner’s interest in net income—2% | | 6 |
| | 4 |
| | 12 |
| | 9 |
|
General partner’s interest in net income attributable to incentive distribution rights | | 55 |
| | 41 |
| | 106 |
| | 78 |
|
Limited partners’ interest in net income | | $ | 246 |
| | $ | 170 |
| | $ | 482 |
| | $ | 370 |
|
Weighted average limited partner units outstanding—basic and diluted | | 296 |
| | 286 |
| | 296 |
| | 285 |
|
Net income per limited partner unit—basic and diluted | | $ | 0.83 |
| | $ | 0.59 |
| | $ | 1.63 |
| | $ | 1.30 |
|
Our partnership agreement requires that, within 60 days after the end of each quarter, we distribute all of our Available Cash, as defined, to unitholders of record on the applicable record date.
Available Cash. Available Cash, for any quarter, consists of all cash and cash equivalents on hand at the end of that quarter:
| |
• | less the amount of cash reserves established by the general partner to: |
| |
• | provide for the proper conduct of business, |
| |
• | comply with applicable law, any debt instrument or other agreement, or |
| |
• | provide funds for minimum quarterly distributions to the unitholders and to the general partner for any one or more of the next four quarters, |
| |
• | plus, if the general partner so determines, all or a portion of cash and cash equivalents on hand on the date of determination of Available Cash for the quarter. |
Incentive Distribution Rights. The general partner holds incentive distribution rights beyond the first target distribution in accordance with the partnership agreement as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Total Quarterly Distribution | | Marginal Percentage Interest in Distributions |
| | Target Per-Unit Amount | | Common Unitholders | | General Partner |
Minimum Quarterly Distribution | | $0.30 | | 98 | % | | 2 | % |
First Target Distribution | | up to $0.345 | | 98 | % | | 2 | % |
Second Target Distribution | | above $0.345 up to $0.375 | | 85 | % | | 15 | % |
Third Target Distribution | | above $0.375 up to $0.45 | | 75 | % | | 25 | % |
Thereafter | | above $0.45 | | 50 | % | | 50 | % |
To the extent these incentive distributions are made to the general partner, there will be more Available Cash proportionately allocated to our general partner than to holders of common units. A cash distribution of $0.61375 per limited partner unit was declared on August 5, 2015 and is payable on August 28, 2015 to unitholders of record at the close of business on August 14, 2015.
4. Goodwill
We perform our goodwill impairment test annually and evaluate goodwill when events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying value may not be recoverable. We completed our annual goodwill impairment test as of April 1, 2015 and no impairments were identified.
We perform our annual review for goodwill impairment at the reporting unit level, which is identified by assessing whether the components of our operating segments constitute businesses for which discrete financial information is available, whether segment management regularly reviews the operating results of those components and whether the economic and regulatory characteristics are similar. We determined that our reporting units are equivalent to our reportable segments.
As permitted under accounting guidance on testing goodwill for impairment, we perform either a qualitative assessment or a quantitative assessment of each of our reporting units based on management’s judgment. With respect to our qualitative assessments, we consider events and circumstances specific to us, such as macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, cost factors and overall financial performance, when evaluating whether it is more likely than not that the fair values of our reporting units are less than their respective carrying amounts.
5. Marketable Securities and Restricted Funds
We routinely invest excess cash and various restricted balances in securities such as commercial paper, bankers acceptances, corporate debt securities, treasury bills and money market funds in the United States. We do not purchase marketable securities for speculative purposes, therefore we do not have any securities classified as trading securities. Initial investments in securities are classified as purchases of the respective type of securities (available-for-sale marketable securities or held-to-maturity (HTM) marketable securities). Maturities of securities are classified within proceeds from sales and maturities of securities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
HTM Securities. All of our HTM securities are restricted funds. We had $3 million of money market securities classified as Current Assets - Other on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. These securities are restricted pursuant to certain Express-Platte debt agreements.
At June 30, 2015, the weighted-average contractual maturity of outstanding HTM securities was less than one year.
There were no material gross unrecognized holding gains or losses associated with investments in HTM securities at June 30, 2015 or December 31, 2014.
6. Debt and Credit Facility
Available Credit Facility and Restricted Debt Covenants
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Expiration Date | | Total Credit Facility Capacity | | Commercial Paper Outstanding at June 30, 2015 | | Available Credit Facility Capacity |
| | | | (in millions) |
Spectra Energy Partners, LP | | 2019 | | $ | 2,000 |
| | $ | 38 |
| | $ | 1,962 |
|
The issuances of commercial paper, letters of credit and revolving borrowings reduce the amount available under the credit facility. As of June 30, 2015, there were no letters of credit issued or revolving borrowings outstanding under the credit facility.
Our credit agreements contain various covenants, including the maintenance of a consolidated leverage ratio, as defined in the agreements. Failure to meet those covenants beyond applicable grace periods could result in accelerated due dates and/or termination of the agreements. As of June 30, 2015, we were in compliance with those covenants. In addition, our credit agreements allow for acceleration of payments or termination of the agreements due to nonpayment, or in some cases, due to the acceleration of our other significant indebtedness or other significant indebtedness of some of our subsidiaries. Our debt and credit agreements do not contain provisions that trigger an acceleration of indebtedness based solely on the occurrence of a material adverse change in our financial condition or results of operations.
As noted above, the terms of our credit agreements require us to maintain a ratio of total Consolidated Indebtedness-to-Consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the agreement, of 5.0 to 1 or less. As of June 30, 2015, this ratio was 3.5 to 1.
Debt Issuances. On March 12, 2015, we issued $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes, comprised of $500 million of 3.50% senior notes due in 2025 and $500 million of 4.50% senior notes due in 2045. Net proceeds from the offering were used to repay a portion of outstanding commercial paper, to fund capital expenditures and for general partnership purposes.
7. Fair Value Measurements
The following presents, for each of the fair value hierarchy levels, assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. There were no liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Description | Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet Caption | | June 30, 2015 |
Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
| | | (in millions) |
Corporate debt securities | Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 82 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 82 |
| | $ | — |
|
Interest rate swaps | Investments and other assets — other | | 8 |
| | — |
| | 8 |
| | — |
|
Total Assets | | $ | 90 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 90 |
| | $ | — |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Description | Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet Caption | | December 31, 2014 |
Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
| | | (in millions) |
Corporate debt securities | Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 43 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 43 |
| | $ | — |
|
Interest rate swaps | Investments and other assets — other | | 5 |
| | — |
| | 5 |
| | — |
|
Total Assets | | $ | 48 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 48 |
| | $ | — |
|
Level 1
Level 1 valuations represent quoted unadjusted prices for identical instruments in active markets.
Level 2 Valuation Techniques
Fair values of our financial instruments that are actively traded in the secondary market, including our long-term debt, are determined based on market-based prices. These valuations may include inputs such as quoted market prices of the exact or similar instruments, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources that may include models or matrix pricing tools, with reasonable levels of price transparency.
For interest rate swaps, we utilize data obtained from a third-party source for the determination of fair value. Both the future cash flows for the fixed-leg and floating-leg of our swaps are discounted to present value.
Level 3 Valuation Techniques
Level 3 valuation techniques include the use of pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques where at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable. Level 3 financial instruments also include those for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.
Financial Instruments
The fair values of financial instruments that are recorded and carried at book value are summarized in the following table. Judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. These estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts we could have realized in current markets.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2015 | | December 31, 2014 |
| | Book Value | | Approximate Fair Value | | Book Value | | Approximate Fair Value |
| | (in millions) |
Note receivable, noncurrent (a) | | $ | 71 |
| | $ | 71 |
| | $ | 71 |
| | $ | 71 |
|
Long-term debt, including current maturities (b) | | 6,169 |
| | 6,338 |
| | 5,184 |
| | 5,554 |
|
________
| |
(a) | Included within Investments in and Loans to Unconsolidated Affiliates. |
| |
(b) | Excludes unamortized items and fair value hedge carrying value adjustments. |
The fair value of our long-term debt is determined based on market-based prices as described in the Level 2 valuation technique described above and is classified as Level 2.
The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, short-term investments, accounts receivable, notes receivable-noncurrent, accounts payable, commercial paper and short-term money market securities - affiliates are not materially different from their carrying amounts because of the short-term nature of these instruments or because the stated rates approximate market rates.
During the six month periods ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, there were no material adjustments to assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.
8. Risk Management and Hedging Activities
Changes in interest rates expose us to risk as a result of our issuance of variable and fixed-rate debt and commercial paper. We are exposed to foreign currency risk from the Canadian portion of Express-Platte (Express Canada). We employ established policies and procedures to manage our risks associated with these market fluctuations, which may include the use of derivatives, mostly around interest rate exposures. For interest rate derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges, the gain or loss on the derivative as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk is recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. There were no significant amounts of gains or losses recognized in net income during the six months ended June 30, 2015.
At June 30, 2015, we had “pay floating — receive fixed” interest rate swaps outstanding with a total notional amount of $900 million to hedge against changes in the fair value of our fixed-rate debt that arise as a result of changes in market interest rates. These swaps also allow us to transform a portion of the underlying interest payments related to our long-term fixed-rate debt securities into variable-rate interest payments in order to achieve our desired mix of fixed and variable-rate debt.
Information about our interest rate swaps that had netting or rights of offset arrangements are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2015 | | December 31, 2014 |
| Gross Amounts Presented in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets | | Amounts Not Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets | | Net Amount | | Gross Amounts Presented in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets | | Amounts Not Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets | | Net Amount |
Description | (in millions) |
Assets | $ | 8 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 8 |
| | $ | 5 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 5 |
|
9. Commitments and Contingencies
Environmental
We are subject to various U.S. federal, state and local laws and regulations, as well as Canadian federal and provincial laws, regarding air and water quality, hazardous and solid waste disposal and other environmental matters. These laws and regulations can change from time to time, imposing new obligations on us.
Like others in the energy industry, we and our affiliates are responsible for environmental remediation at various contaminated sites. These include some properties that are part of our ongoing operations, sites formerly owned or used by us, and sites owned by third parties. Remediation typically involves management of contaminated soils and may involve groundwater remediation. Managed in conjunction with relevant federal, state/provincial and local agencies, activities vary with site conditions and locations, remedial requirements, complexity and sharing of responsibility. If remediation activities involve statutory joint and several liability provisions, strict liability, or cost recovery or contribution actions, we or our affiliates could potentially be held responsible for contamination caused by other parties. In some instances, we may share liability associated with contamination with other potentially responsible parties, and may also benefit from contractual indemnities that cover some or all cleanup costs. All of these sites generally are managed in the normal course of business or affiliated operations. We believe there are no matters outstanding that upon resolution will have a material effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Litigation
Litigation and Legal Proceedings. We are involved in legal, tax and regulatory proceedings in various forums arising in the ordinary course of business, including matters regarding contract and payment claims, some of which involve substantial monetary amounts. We have insurance coverage for certain of these losses should they be incurred. We believe that the final disposition of these proceedings will not have a material effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Legal costs related to the defense of loss contingencies are expensed as incurred. We had no material reserves for legal matters recorded as of June 30, 2015 or December 31, 2014 related to litigation.
10. Issuances of Common Units
During the six months ended June 30, 2015, we issued 3.6 million common units to the public under our at-the-market program, and approximately 74,000 general partner units to Spectra Energy. Total net proceeds were $184 million, including approximately $4 million of proceeds from Spectra Energy.
11. New Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements of “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605)” and clarifies the principles of recognizing revenue. In July 2015, the FASB decided to defer the effective date of the new revenue standard for one year and to permit entities to early adopt the standard as of the original effective date. This ASU is effective for us January 1, 2018. We are currently evaluating this ASU and its potential impact on us.
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, "Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis", which makes changes to both the variable interest model and the voting model. These changes will require re-evaluation of certain entities for consolidation and will require us to revise our documentation regarding the consolidation or deconsolidation of such entities. ASU No. 2015-02 is effective for us January 1, 2016. We are currently evaluating this ASU and its potential impact on us.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, “Interest-Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs,” which requires that debt issuance costs be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability, rather than as a deferred charge asset. ASU No. 2015-03 is effective for us January 1, 2016 and is to be applied retrospectively. Earlier application is permitted. This ASU is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flow.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-06, “Earnings Per Share (Topic 260): Effects on Historical Earnings per Unit of Master Limited Partnership Dropdown Transactions (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force),” which applies to master limited partnerships that receive net assets through a dropdown transaction. ASU 2015-06 specifies that for purposes of calculating historical earnings per unit under the two-class method, the earnings (losses) of a transferred business before the date of a dropdown transaction should be allocated entirely to the general partner. Qualitative disclosures about how the rights to the earnings (losses) differ before and after the dropdown transaction occurs for purposes of computing earnings per unit under the two-class method also are required. ASU 2015-06 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years and will be applied retrospectively. Earlier application is permitted. We are currently evaluating this ASU and its potential impact on us.
|
| |
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
INTRODUCTION
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
For the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we reported net income from controlling interests of $307 million and $215 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we reported net income from controlling interests of $600 million and $457 million, respectively.
The highlights for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2015 included increased earnings driven by expansion projects, primarily at Texas Eastern Transmission, LP (Texas Eastern) and East Tennessee Natural Gas, LLC (East Tennessee), higher crude oil transportation revenues as a result of higher contracted volumes and increased tariff rates mainly on the Express pipeline, and higher equity earnings from Sand Hills as a result of increased volumes.
For the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, distributable cash flow was $321 million and $239 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, distributable cash flow was $675 million and $563 million, respectively.
A cash distribution of $0.61375 per limited partner unit was declared on August 5, 2015 and is payable on August 28, 2015. We intend to increase our quarterly distribution by one and a quarter cents per unit each quarter through 2017. Our Board of Directors evaluates each distribution decision within the confines of the Partnership agreement and based on an assessment of growth in distributable cash flow.
For the six months ended June 30, 2015, we had $638 million of capital and investment expenditures. We currently project $2.5 billion of capital and investment expenditures for the full year, including expansion capital expenditures of $2.2 billion.
We are committed to an investment-grade balance sheet and continued prudent financial management of our capital structure. Therefore, financing growth activities will continue to be based on our strong and growing fee-based earnings and cash flows as well as the issuances of debt and equity securities. As of June 30, 2015, we have access to a $2.0 billion revolving credit facility which is used principally as a back-stop for our commercial paper program.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2015 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| (in millions) |
Operating revenues | $ | 603 |
| | $ | 531 |
| | $ | 1,209 |
| | $ | 1,112 |
|
Operating expenses | 281 |
| | 282 |
| | 576 |
| | 555 |
|
Operating income | 322 |
| | 249 |
| | 633 |
| | 557 |
|
Earnings from equity investments | 45 |
| | 29 |
| | 85 |
| | 57 |
|
Other income and expenses, net | 17 |
| | 6 |
| | 26 |
| | 9 |
|
Interest expense | 63 |
| | 62 |
| | 120 |
| | 129 |
|
Earnings before income taxes | 321 |
| | 222 |
| | 624 |
| | 494 |
|
Income tax expense | 5 |
| | 2 |
| | 7 |
| | 28 |
|
Net income | 316 |
| | 220 |
| | 617 |
| | 466 |
|
Net income—noncontrolling interests | 9 |
| | 5 |
| | 17 |
| | 9 |
|
Net income—controlling interests | $ | 307 |
| | $ | 215 |
| | $ | 600 |
| | $ | 457 |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Same Period in 2014
Operating Revenues. The $72 million or 14% increase was driven mainly by:
| |
• | revenues from expansion projects, primarily on Texas Eastern and East Tennessee, |
| |
• | higher crude oil transportation revenues as a result of higher contracted volumes and increased tariff rates mainly on the Express pipeline, and |
| |
• | higher recoveries of electric power and other costs passed through to gas transmission customers. |
Operating Expenses. The $1 million decrease was driven mainly by:
| |
• | lower ad valorem tax accruals, offset by |
| |
• | higher electric power and other costs passed through to gas transmission customers. |
Earnings from Equity Investments. The $16 million or 55% increase was mainly attributable to higher earnings from Sand Hills due to increased volumes and the dropdown of an additional 24.95% ownership interest in SESH in November 2014.
Other Income and Expenses, Net. The $11 million increase was mainly attributable to higher allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC) from higher capital spending on expansion projects.
Interest Expense. The $1 million increase was driven mainly by higher long-term debt balances, mostly offset by higher capitalized interest.
Income Tax Expense. The $3 million increase was mainly due to an increase in earnings from Express Canada.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Same Period in 2014
Operating Revenues. The $97 million or 9% increase was driven mainly by:
| |
• | revenues from expansion projects, primarily on Texas Eastern and East Tennessee, |
| |
• | higher crude oil transportation revenues as a result of higher contracted volumes and increased tariff rates mainly on the Express pipeline, and |
| |
• | higher recoveries of electric power and other costs passed through to gas transmission customers, partially offset by |
| |
• | lower natural gas transportation revenues mainly from other revenue on East Tennessee and interruptible transportation on Texas Eastern, and |
| |
• | lower inventory settlement revenues due to timing of inventory changes and lower oil prices on the Express and Platte pipelines. |
Operating Expenses. The $21 million increase was driven mainly by:
| |
• | higher electric power and other costs passed through to gas transmission customers, and |
| |
• | a non-cash impairment charge on Ozark Gas Gathering, L.LC. (Ozark Gas Gathering), partially offset by |
| |
• | lower ad valorem tax accruals. |
Earnings from Equity Investments. The $28 million or 49% increase was mainly attributable to higher earnings from Sand Hills due to increased volumes and the dropdown of an additional 24.95% ownership interest in SESH in November 2014.
Other Income and Expenses, Net. The $17 million increase was mainly attributable to higher AFUDC from higher capital spending on expansion projects.
Interest Expense. The $9 million or 7% decrease was driven mainly by higher capital spending on expansion projects and lower average interest rates offset by higher average long-term debt balances.
Income Tax Expense. The $21 million decrease mainly reflects an adjustment to deferred income tax liabilities in 2014, as a result of the final purchase price adjustments related to the acquisition of Express-Platte.
Segment Results
Management evaluates segment performance based on EBITDA transactions. Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments are managed centrally, so the gains and losses from foreign currency remeasurement, and interest and dividend income, are excluded from the segments’ EBITDA. We consider segment EBITDA to be a good indicator of each segment’s operating performance from its continuing operations, as it represents the results of our operations without regard to financing methods or capital structures. Our segment EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies because other companies may not calculate EBITDA in the same manner.
Segment EBITDA is summarized in the following table. Detailed discussions follow.
EBITDA by Business Segment
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2015 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| (in millions) |
U.S. Transmission | $ | 396 |
| | $ | 320 |
| | $ | 785 |
| | $ | 694 |
|
Liquids | 78 |
| | 51 |
| | 142 |
| | 109 |
|
Total reportable segment EBITDA | 474 |
| | 371 |
| | 927 |
| | 803 |
|
Other | (18 | ) | | (18 | ) | | (35 | ) | | (37 | ) |
Total reportable segment and other EBITDA | 456 |
| | 353 |
| | 892 |
| | 766 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 73 |
| | 70 |
| | 146 |
| | 143 |
|
Interest expense | 63 |
| | 62 |
| | 120 |
| | 129 |
|
Other income | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | (2 | ) | | — |
|
Earnings before income taxes | $ | 321 |
| | $ | 222 |
| | $ | 624 |
| | $ | 494 |
|
The amounts discussed below are after eliminating intercompany transactions.
U.S. Transmission
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2015 | | 2014 | | Increase (Decrease) | | 2015 | | 2014 | | Increase (Decrease) |
| (in millions) |
Operating revenues | $ | 509 |
| | $ | 454 |
| | $ | 55 |
| | $ | 1,031 |
| | $ | 954 |
| | $ | 77 |
|
Operating expenses | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating, maintenance and other | 156 |
| | 160 |
| | (4 | ) | | 327 |
| | 311 |
| | 16 |
|
Other income and expenses | 43 |
| | 26 |
| | 17 |
| | 81 |
| | 51 |
| | 30 |
|
EBITDA | $ | 396 |
| | $ | 320 |
| | $ | 76 |
| | $ | 785 |
| | $ | 694 |
| | $ | 91 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Same Period in 2014
Operating Revenues. The $55 million increase was driven by:
| |
• | a $32 million increase due to expansion projects, primarily on Texas Eastern and East Tennessee, and |
| |
• | a $17 million increase in recoveries of electric power and other costs passed through to customers. |
Operating Expenses. The $4 million decrease was driven by:
| |
• | a $17 million decrease primarily due to ad valorem tax accruals, offset by |
| |
• | a $17 million increase in electric power and other costs passed through to customers. |
Other Income and Expenses. The $17 million increase was mainly due to higher AFUDC from higher capital spending on expansion projects and higher equity earnings mainly due to the dropdown of an additional 24.95% interest in SESH in November 2014.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Same Period in 2014
Operating Revenues. The $77 million increase was driven by:
| |
• | a $65 million increase due to expansion projects, primarily on Texas Eastern and East Tennessee, and |
| |
• | a $31 million increase in recoveries of electric power and other costs passed through to customers, partially offset by |
| |
• | an $11 million net decrease in natural gas transportation revenues mainly from other revenue on East Tennessee and interruptible transportation on Texas Eastern. |
Operating Expenses. The $16 million increase was driven by:
| |
• | a $31 million increase in electric power and other costs passed through to customers, and |
| |
• | a $9 million increase due to a non-cash impairment charge on Ozark Gas Gathering, partially offset by |
| |
• | a $21 million decrease in ad valorem tax accruals. |
Other Income and Expenses. The $30 million increase was mainly due to higher AFUDC from higher capital spending on expansion projects and higher equity earnings mainly due to the dropdown of an additional 24.95% interest in SESH in November 2014.
Liquids
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2015 | | 2014 | | Increase (Decrease) | | 2015 | | 2014 | | Increase (Decrease) |
| (in millions) |
Operating revenues | $ | 94 |
| | $ | 77 |
| | $ | 17 |
| | $ | 178 |
| | $ | 158 |
| | $ | 20 |
|
Operating expenses | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating, maintenance and other | 34 |
| | 34 |
| | — |
| | 68 |
| | 64 |
| | 4 |
|
Other income and expenses | 18 |
| | 8 |
| | 10 |
| | 32 |
| | 15 |
| | 17 |
|
EBITDA | $ | 78 |
| | $ | 51 |
| | $ | 27 |
| | $ | 142 |
| | $ | 109 |
| | $ | 33 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Express pipeline revenue receipts, MBbl/d (a) | 235 |
| | 204 |
| | 31 |
| | 242 |
| | 214 |
| | 28 |
|
Platte PADD II deliveries, MBbl/d | 172 |
| | 176 |
| | (4 | ) | | 170 |
| | 171 |
| | (1 | ) |
_______
(a) Thousand barrels per day.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Same Period in 2014
Operating Revenues. The $17 million increase in operating revenues was primarily driven by higher crude oil transportation revenues as a result of higher contracted volumes and increased tariff rates mainly on the Express pipeline.
Other Income and Expenses. The $10 million increase was primarily due to higher earnings from Sand Hills due to increased volumes.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Same Period in 2014
Operating Revenues. The $20 million increase in operating revenues was driven by:
| |
• | a $33 million increase in crude oil transportation revenues as a result of higher contracted volumes and increased tariff rates mainly on the Express pipeline, partially offset by |
| |
• | a $7 million decrease in inventory settlement revenues due to timing of inventory changes and lower oil prices on the Express and Platte pipelines. |
Operating Expenses. The $4 million increase in operating expenses was primarily driven by an increase in power costs due to higher usage in 2015, partially offset by lower rates.
Other Income and Expenses. The $17 million increase was primarily due to higher earnings from Sand Hills due to increased volumes.
Other
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2015 | | 2014 | | Increase (Decrease) | | 2015 | | 2014 | | Increase (Decrease) |
| (in millions) |
Operating expenses | $ | 18 |
| | $ | 18 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 35 |
| | $ | 37 |
| | $ | (2 | ) |
EBITDA | $ | (18 | ) | | $ | (18 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (35 | ) | | $ | (37 | ) | | $ | 2 |
|
Distributable Cash Flow
We define Distributable Cash Flow as EBITDA plus
| |
• | distributions from equity investments, |
| |
• | other non-cash items affecting net income, less |
| |
• | earnings from equity investments, |
| |
• | net cash paid for income taxes, |
| |
• | distributions to noncontrolling interests, and |
| |
• | maintenance capital expenditures, excluding the effect of reimbursable projects. |
Distributable Cash Flow does not reflect changes in working capital balances. Distributable Cash Flow should not be viewed as indicative of the actual amount of cash that we plan to distribute for a given period.
Distributable Cash Flow is the primary financial measure used by our management and by external users of our financial statements to assess the amount of cash that is available for distribution.
Distributable Cash Flow is a non-GAAP measure and should not be considered an alternative to Net Income, Operating Income, cash from operations or any other measure of financial performance or liquidity presented in accordance with GAAP. Distributable Cash Flow excludes some, but not all, items that affect Net Income and Operating Income and these measures may vary among other companies. Therefore, Distributable Cash Flow as presented may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.
Significant drivers of variances in Distributable Cash Flow between the periods presented are substantially the same as those previously discussed under Results of Operations. Other drivers include the timing of certain cash outflows, such as capital expenditures for maintenance.
Reconciliation of Net Income to Non-GAAP “Distributable Cash Flow”
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2015 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| (in millions) |
Net income | $ | 316 |
| | $ | 220 |
| | $ | 617 |
| | $ | 466 |
|
Add: | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | 63 |
| | 62 |
| | 120 |
| | 129 |
|
Income tax expense | 5 |
| | 2 |
| | 7 |
| | 28 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 73 |
| | 70 |
| | 146 |
| | 143 |
|
Foreign currency (gain) loss | — |
| | (1 | ) | | 3 |
| | — |
|
Less: | | | | | | | |
Third Party interest income | 1 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
|
EBITDA | 456 |
| | 353 |
| | 892 |
| | 766 |
|
Add: | | | | | | | |
Earnings from equity investments | (45 | ) | | (29 | ) | | (85 | ) | | (57 | ) |
Distributions from equity investments (a) | 70 |
| | 43 |
| | 124 |
| | 80 |
|
Non-cash impairment on Ozark Gas Gathering | — |
| | — |
| | 9 |
| | — |
|
Other | 3 |
| | 4 |
| | 6 |
| | 6 |
|
Less: | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | 63 |
| | 62 |
| | 120 |
| | 129 |
|
Equity AFUDC | 16 |
| | 5 |
| | 27 |
| | 9 |
|
Net cash paid for income taxes | 2 |
| | 5 |
| | 7 |
| | 5 |
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interests | 9 |
| | 6 |
| | 16 |
| | 11 |
|
Maintenance capital expenditures (b) | 73 |
| | 54 |
| | 101 |
| | 78 |
|
Distributable Cash Flow | $ | 321 |
| | $ | 239 |
| | $ | 675 |
| | $ | 563 |
|
________
| |
(a) | Excludes $4 million and $117 million of distributions from equity investments for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. |
| |
(b) | Excludes reimbursable expenditures. |
Annual Goodwill Impairment Test
As permitted under accounting guidance on testing goodwill for impairment, we perform either a qualitative assessment or a quantitative assessment of each of our reporting units based on management’s judgment. With respect to our qualitative assessments, we consider events and circumstances specific to us, such as macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, cost factors and overall financial performance, when evaluating whether it is more likely than not that the fair values of our reporting units are less than their respective carrying amounts.
In connection with our quantitative assessments, we primarily use a discounted cash flow analysis to determine fair values of those reporting units. Key assumptions in the determination of fair value include the use of an appropriate discount rate and estimated future cash flows. In estimating cash flows, we incorporate expected long-term growth rates in key markets served by our operations, regulatory stability, the ability to renew contracts, commodity prices (where appropriate) and foreign currency exchange rates, as well as other factors that affect our reporting units’ revenue, expense and capital expenditure projections.
We performed a quantitative assessment for U.S. Transmission and a qualitative assessment for the Liquids reporting unit to determine whether it is more likely than not that the respective fair values of these reporting units are less than their carrying amounts, including goodwill as of April 1, 2015 (our annual testing date). Based on the results of our annual goodwill impairment testing, no indicators of impairment were noted and the fair values of the reporting units that we assessed at April 1, 2015 were substantially in excess of their respective carrying values.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As of June 30, 2015, we had negative working capital of $292 million. This balance includes commercial paper liabilities totaling $38 million and current maturities of long-term debt of $287 million. We will rely upon cash flows from operations, including cash distributions received from our equity affiliates, and various financing transactions, which may include debt and/or equity issuances, to fund our liquidity and capital requirements for the next 12 months. We have access to a revolving credit facility, with available capacity of $1,962 million at June 30, 2015. This facility is used principally as a back-stop for our commercial paper program, which is used to manage working capital requirements and for temporary funding of our capital expenditures. We expect to be self-funding and plan to continue to pursue expansion opportunities over the next several years. Capital resources may continue to include commercial paper, short-term borrowings under our current credit facility and possibly securing additional sources of capital including debt and/or equity. See Note 6 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the available credit facility and Financing Cash Flows and Liquidity for a discussion of effective shelf registrations.
Cash Flow Analysis
The following table summarizes the changes in cash flows for each of the periods presented: |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (in millions) |
Net cash provided by (used in): | | | | |
Operating activities | | $ | 731 |
| | $ | 603 |
|
Investing activities | | (603 | ) | | (288 | ) |
Financing activities | | (101 | ) | | (313 | ) |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | | 27 |
| | 2 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period | | 140 |
| | 121 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period | | $ | 167 |
| | $ | 123 |
|
Operating Cash Flows
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $128 million to $731 million in the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period in 2014, driven mainly by higher earnings and higher distributions from unconsolidated affiliates.
Investing Cash Flows
Net cash used in investing activities increased $315 million to $603 million in the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period in 2014. The change was mainly driven by:
| |
• | a $194 million net increase in capital and investment expenditures, and |
| |
• | a $107 million decrease in distributions received from unconsolidated affiliates in 2014 comprised mostly of a $99 million distribution from SESH with proceeds from a SESH debt offering. |
Capital and Investment Expenditures by Business Segment
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (in millions) |
U.S. Transmission | | $ | 599 |
| | $ | 406 |
|
Liquids | | 39 |
| | 38 |
|
Total consolidated | | $ | 638 |
| | $ | 444 |
|
Capital and investment expenditures for the six months ended June 30, 2015 consisted of $546 million for expansion projects and $92 million for maintenance and other projects.
We project 2015 capital and investment expenditures of approximately $2.5 billion, consisting of $2.2 billion of expansion capital expenditures and $0.3 billion for maintenance and upgrades of existing plants, pipelines and infrastructure to serve growth.
Financing Cash Flows and Liquidity
Net cash used in financing activities decreased by $212 million to $101 million in the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period in 2014. The change was mainly driven by:
| |
• | $978 million of net issuances of long-term debt in 2015 (which was used primarily to pay down $869 million of commercial paper), compared to $427 of net redemptions in 2014, partially offset by |
| |
• | $211 million of net commercial paper issuances in 2014, |
| |
• | a $66 million increase in distributions to partners, |
| |
• | a $22 million decrease in contributions from noncontrolling interests, and |
| |
• | an $11 million decrease in proceeds from issuances of units. |
In the 2015 period, contributions from noncontrolling interests include $32 million from Duke Energy Corporation to purchase a 7.5% equity share in Sabal Trail Transmission, LLC (Sabal Trail). This transaction reduced our ownership in Sabal Trail to 59.5%.
During the six months ended June 30, 2015, we issued 3.6 million common units to the public under our at-the-market program and approximately 74,000 general partner units to Spectra Energy. Total net proceeds were $184 million, including approximately $4 million of proceeds from Spectra Energy. The net proceeds were used for general partnership purposes, which may have included debt repayment, capital expenditures and/or additions to working capital. In 2015, we have issued 7.2 million common units to the public and approximately 147,000 general partner units to Spectra Energy, for total net proceeds of approximately $353 million, including $7 million of proceeds from Spectra Energy.
On March 12, 2015, we issued $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes, comprised of $500 million of 3.50% senior notes due in 2025 and $500 million of 4.50% senior notes due in 2045. Net proceeds from the offering were used to repay a portion of outstanding commercial paper, to fund capital expenditures and for general partnership purposes.
Available Credit Facility and Restrictive Debt Covenants. See Note 6 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the available credit facility and related financial and other covenants.
Cash Distributions. A cash distribution of $0.61375 per limited partner unit was declared on August 5, 2015, payable on August 28, 2015, representing the thirty-first consecutive quarterly increase.
Other Financing Matters. We have an effective shelf registration statement on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to register the issuance of unspecified amounts of limited partner common units and various debt securities and another registration statement on file with the SEC to register the issuance of $500 million, in the aggregate, of limited partner units over time. This registration has $357 million available as of June 30, 2015.
OTHER ISSUES
New Accounting Pronouncements. See Note 11 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion.
|
| |
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk. |
Our exposure to market risk is described in Item 7A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2014. We believe our exposure to market risk has not changed materially since then.
|
| |
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures. |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported, within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Under the supervision and with the participation of the management of Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP (our General Partner), including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2015, and, based upon this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Under the supervision and with the participation of the management of our General Partner, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated changes in internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2015 and found no change that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
| |
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings. |
We have no material pending legal proceedings that are required to be disclosed hereunder. For information regarding other legal proceedings and environmental matters, see Note 9 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which information is incorporated by reference into this Part II.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, careful consideration should be given to the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, which could materially affect our financial condition or future results. There have been no material changes to those risk factors.
Any agreements included as exhibits to this Form 10-Q may contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to the applicable agreement. These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the other parties to the applicable agreement and:
| |
• | were not intended to be treated as categorical statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate; |
| |
• | may have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable agreement; |
| |
• | may apply contract standards of “materiality” that are different from “materiality” under the applicable securities laws; and |
| |
• | were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement. |
We acknowledge that, notwithstanding the inclusion of the foregoing cautionary statements, we are responsible for considering whether additional specific disclosures of material information regarding material contractual provisions are required to make the statements in this Form 10-Q not misleading.
|
| | |
(a) Exhibits | | |
Exhibit Number | | |
| |
| | |
*3.1 | | Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Spectra Energy Partners, LP (as amended as of July 2, 2015). |
| | |
*31.1 | | Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
*31.2 | | Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
*32.1 | | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
*32.2 | | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
*101.INS | | XBRL Instance Document. |
| |
*101.SCH | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema. |
| |
*101.CAL | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase. |
| |
*101.DEF | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase. |
| |
*101.LAB | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase. |
| |
*101.PRE | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase. |
The total amount of securities of the registrant or its subsidiaries authorized under any instrument with respect to long-term debt not filed as an exhibit does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The registrant agrees, upon request of the Securities and Exchange Commission, to furnish copies of any or all of such instruments to it.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP |
| | | |
| | By: | | Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP, its general partner |
| | | |
| | By: | | Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC, its general partner |
| | | |
Date: August 6, 2015 | | | | /S/ GREGORY L. EBEL |
| | | | Gregory L. Ebel President and Chief Executive Officer |
| | | |
Date: August 6, 2015 | | | | /S/ J. PATRICK REDDY |
| | | | J. Patrick Reddy Chief Financial Officer |