e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
OR
|
|
|
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number 001-33155
IPG PHOTONICS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
04-3444218 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
|
|
|
50 Old Webster Road, Oxford, Massachusetts
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
01540
(Zip code) |
(508) 373-1100
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data file required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES o NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer o |
Accelerated Filer þ |
Non-Accelerated Filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). YES o NO þ
As of November 02, 2009, there were 45,688,249 shares of the registrants common stock issued
and outstanding.
PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
IPG PHOTONICS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share date) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
76,309 |
|
|
$ |
51,283 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
29,768 |
|
|
|
41,842 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
59,155 |
|
|
|
72,555 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
975 |
|
|
|
1,968 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
6,581 |
|
|
|
7,200 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
11,275 |
|
|
|
6,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
184,063 |
|
|
|
181,023 |
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES |
|
|
4,077 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, Net |
|
|
114,957 |
|
|
|
114,492 |
|
OTHER ASSETS |
|
|
15,842 |
|
|
|
15,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
$ |
318,939 |
|
|
$ |
313,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving line-of-credit facilities |
|
$ |
15,476 |
|
|
$ |
19,769 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
1,333 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
4,624 |
|
|
|
7,739 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
21,276 |
|
|
|
17,988 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
1,690 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
3,341 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
46,251 |
|
|
|
49,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES AND OTHER LONG-TERM
LIABILITIES |
|
|
2,485 |
|
|
|
2,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM DEBT |
|
|
17,000 |
|
|
|
17,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPG PHOTONICS CORPORATION STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.0001 par value,
175,000,000 shares authorized;
45,665,424 shares issued and outstanding
at September 30, 2009; 44,965,960 shares
issued and outstanding at December 31,
2008 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
291,673 |
|
|
|
283,217 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(51,546 |
) |
|
|
(53,843 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
12,965 |
|
|
|
8,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total IPG Photonics Corporation
stockholders equity |
|
|
253,097 |
|
|
|
238,172 |
|
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
5,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
253,203 |
|
|
|
243,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
$ |
318,939 |
|
|
$ |
313,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
IPG PHOTONICS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
NET SALES |
|
$ |
45,808 |
|
|
$ |
62,012 |
|
|
$ |
131,601 |
|
|
$ |
170,882 |
|
COST OF SALES |
|
|
29,085 |
|
|
|
32,590 |
|
|
|
87,245 |
|
|
|
90,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS PROFIT |
|
|
16,723 |
|
|
|
29,422 |
|
|
|
44,356 |
|
|
|
80,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
3,788 |
|
|
|
3,735 |
|
|
|
10,857 |
|
|
|
10,585 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
4,569 |
|
|
|
4,130 |
|
|
|
13,445 |
|
|
|
11,451 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
4,758 |
|
|
|
6,062 |
|
|
|
14,692 |
|
|
|
18,239 |
|
(Gain) loss on foreign exchange |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(1,594 |
) |
|
|
975 |
|
|
|
(1,908 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
13,075 |
|
|
|
12,333 |
|
|
|
39,969 |
|
|
|
38,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
|
3,648 |
|
|
|
17,089 |
|
|
|
4,387 |
|
|
|
42,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME, NET: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense, net |
|
|
(266 |
) |
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
(1,023 |
) |
|
|
(472 |
) |
Other (expense) income, net |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
(259 |
) |
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (expense) income |
|
|
(341 |
) |
|
|
(297 |
) |
|
|
(1,282 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES |
|
|
3,307 |
|
|
|
16,792 |
|
|
|
3,105 |
|
|
|
42,363 |
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES |
|
|
(1,041 |
) |
|
|
(5,310 |
) |
|
|
(978 |
) |
|
|
(13,365 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
|
2,266 |
|
|
|
11,482 |
|
|
|
2,127 |
|
|
|
28,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LESS: NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
1,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO IPG
PHOTONICS CORPORATION |
|
$ |
2,255 |
|
|
$ |
10,893 |
|
|
$ |
2,297 |
|
|
$ |
27,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO IPG
PHOTONICS CORPORATION PER SHARE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
45,573 |
|
|
|
44,685 |
|
|
|
45,368 |
|
|
|
44,380 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
46,695 |
|
|
|
46,375 |
|
|
|
46,457 |
|
|
|
46,184 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
IPG PHOTONICS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,127 |
|
|
$ |
28,998 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
14,024 |
|
|
|
11,101 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(8,119 |
) |
|
|
(1,629 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
1,992 |
|
|
|
1,499 |
|
Loss (gain) on foreign currency transactions |
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
(1,852 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(566 |
) |
Provisions for inventory, warranty and bad debt |
|
|
8,635 |
|
|
|
6,045 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities that provided (used) cash: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
10,730 |
|
|
|
(6,237 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
2,844 |
|
|
|
(21,836 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(264 |
) |
|
|
3,530 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(1,481 |
) |
|
|
519 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
2,314 |
|
Income and other taxes payable |
|
|
5,396 |
|
|
|
3,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
37,692 |
|
|
|
25,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant, equipment and intangible assets |
|
|
(9,580 |
) |
|
|
(29,489 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,450 |
|
Other |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(9,522 |
) |
|
|
(23,848 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from line-of-credit facilities |
|
|
17,393 |
|
|
|
21,049 |
|
Payments on line-of-credit facilities |
|
|
(21,779 |
) |
|
|
(16,682 |
) |
Purchases of noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(508 |
) |
|
|
(1,220 |
) |
Proceeds from long-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,044 |
|
Principal payments on long-term borrowings |
|
|
(1,011 |
) |
|
|
(19,855 |
) |
Exercise of employee stock options and related tax benefit from exercise |
|
|
2,121 |
|
|
|
2,359 |
|
Other |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(3,845 |
) |
|
|
5,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EFFECT OF CHANGES IN EXCHANGE RATES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
(431 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
25,026 |
|
|
|
6,367 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Beginning of period |
|
|
51,283 |
|
|
|
37,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS End of period |
|
$ |
76,309 |
|
|
$ |
44,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
1,163 |
|
|
$ |
1,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
4,595 |
|
|
$ |
8,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment included in accounts payable |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
981 |
|
Inventory contributed to unconsolidated affiliate |
|
$ |
238 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Purchases of noncontrolling interests in exchange for Common Stock |
|
$ |
3,027 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Equipment contributed as investment in affiliates |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
298 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
IPG PHOTONICS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share data) |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
COMMON STOCK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
|
44,965,960 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
44,012,341 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Common stock issued in purchase of noncontrolling interests |
|
|
368,146 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued under employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
24,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
307,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
829,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
45,665,424 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
44,842,289 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
283,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275,506 |
|
Common stock issued in purchase of noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium on purchase of noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(712 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount on purchase of noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued under employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options and related tax benefit from exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,359 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
291,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACCUMULATED DEFICIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,843 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90,497 |
) |
Net income attributable to IPG Photonics Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,546 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62,903 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,167 |
|
Translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,071 |
) |
Unrealized loss on marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL IPG PHONTONICS CORPORATION STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
253,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
228,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,455 |
|
Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
441 |
|
Purchase of noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,535 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium on purchase of noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount on purchase of noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,028 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
253,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
233,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
IPG PHOTONICS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been
prepared by IPG Photonics Corporation, or IPG, we, our, or the Company. Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of
America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The consolidated financial statements include our
accounts and those of our subsidiaries. All intercompany balances have been eliminated
in consolidation. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in our annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted provisions of Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 810, Consolidation, which were
previously issued as Statement of Financial Accounting Standard( SFAS) 160
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of ARB
No. 51. The new provisions of FASB ASC 810 which were retrospectively applied:
|
|
|
clarify that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership
interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the
consolidated financial statements, |
|
|
|
require consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the
amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest, |
|
|
|
establish standards for accounting for changes in a parents ownership
interest in a subsidiary, and |
|
|
|
require expanded disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between
interests of the parents owners and the interests of the noncontrolling owners
of a subsidiary. |
The calculation of earnings per share continues to be based on income amounts
attributable to the parent. The changes in presentation prescribed by the new
provisions of FASB ASC 810 are incorporated in the accompanying Consolidated Balance
Sheets, Consolidated Statements of Operations, Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
and Consolidated Statements of Equity.
In the opinion of our management, the unaudited financial information for the
interim periods presented reflects all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of
our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The results reported in
these consolidated financial statements are not necessarily indicative of results that
may be expected for the entire year.
2. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued its final
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 168 The FASB Accounting
Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles a
replacement of FASB Statement No. 162. SFAS No. 168 made the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification (the Codification) the single source of U.S. GAAP used by nongovernmental
entities in the preparation of financial statements, except for rules and interpretive
releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws, which are sources of
authoritative accounting guidance for SEC registrants. The Codification is meant to
simplify user access to all authoritative accounting guidance by reorganizing U.S. GAAP
pronouncements into roughly 90 accounting topics within a consistent structure; its
purpose is not to create new accounting and reporting guidance. The Codification
supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards and was effective
for the company beginning July 1, 2009. Following SFAS No. 168, the Board will not
issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues
Task Force Abstracts; instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates. The FASB
will not consider Accounting Standards Updates as authoritative in their own right;
these updates will serve only to update the Codification, provide background
information about the guidance, and provide the bases for conclusions on the change(s)
in the Codification. In the description of Accounting Standards Updates that follows,
references in italics relate to Codification Topics and Subtopics, and their
descriptive titles, as appropriate.
In March 2008, the FASB issued standards requiring further disclosure on
derivative instruments and hedging activities. The new standard applies to all
derivative instruments and non-derivative instruments that are designated and qualify
as hedging instruments and related hedged items accounted . The new standard requires
additional disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b)
how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for, and (c) how
derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys financial position,
results of operations, and cash flows. This standard was effective for the Company
beginning January 1, 2009. The disclosures prescribed by this standard are included in
Note 7.
7
Effective June 30, 2009, we adopted a new FASB standard on disclosing related to
financial instruments FASB ASC 825, Financial Instruments, which requires disclosures
about fair value of financial instruments in interim reporting periods as well
as in annual financial statements. The adoption of the new standard required the
Company to provide additional disclosures, which are included in Note 8.
3. INVENTORIES
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Components and raw materials |
|
$ |
19,458 |
|
|
$ |
27,482 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
23,409 |
|
|
|
28,653 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
16,288 |
|
|
|
16,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
59,155 |
|
|
$ |
72,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recorded inventory provisions totaling $5.6 million and $3.3 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. These provisions were recorded
as a result of changes in market prices of certain components, the realizable value of those
inventories through finished product sales and uncertainties related to the recoverability of
the value of inventories due to technological changes and excess quantities. These provisions
are reported as a reduction to components and raw materials and finished goods.
4. FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
The Companys borrowings under existing financing arrangements consist of the following
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revolving Line-of-Credit Facilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro Credit and Overdraft Facilities |
|
$ |
1,280 |
|
|
$ |
670 |
|
U.S. Line of Credit |
|
|
14,196 |
|
|
|
19,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
15,476 |
|
|
$ |
19,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Long-Term Note |
|
$ |
18,333 |
|
|
$ |
19,330 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
(1,333 |
) |
|
|
(1,333 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
17,000 |
|
|
$ |
17,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO IPG PHOTONICS CORPORATION PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of diluted net income attributable to IPG
Photonics Corporation per share (in thousands, except per share data):
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net income attributable to IPG Photonics Corporation |
|
$ |
2,255 |
|
|
$ |
10,893 |
|
|
$ |
2,297 |
|
|
$ |
27,594 |
|
Weighted average shares |
|
|
45,573 |
|
|
|
44,685 |
|
|
|
45,368 |
|
|
|
44,380 |
|
Dilutive effect of common stock equivalents |
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
1,689 |
|
|
|
1,089 |
|
|
|
1,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares |
|
|
46,695 |
|
|
|
46,375 |
|
|
|
46,457 |
|
|
|
46,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income attributable to IPG Photonics
Corporation per share |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income attributable to IPG Photonics
Corporation per share |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Total comprehensive income and its components were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,255 |
|
|
$ |
10,893 |
|
|
$ |
2,297 |
|
|
$ |
27,594 |
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on secured note interest rate swap, net of tax |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(132 |
) |
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
(199 |
) |
Unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
4,365 |
|
|
|
(9,313 |
) |
|
|
3,919 |
|
|
|
(2,939 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
6,537 |
|
|
$ |
1,448 |
|
|
$ |
6,468 |
|
|
$ |
24,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Our primary market exposures are to interest rates and foreign exchange rates. We
use certain derivative financial instruments to help manage these exposures. We execute
these instruments with financial institutions we judge to be credit-worthy. We do not
hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
We recognize all derivative financial instruments as either assets or liabilities
at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet. We have used foreign currency forward
contracts as cash flow hedges of forecasted intercompany settlements denominated in
foreign currencies of major industrial countries. We have no outstanding foreign
currency forward contracts. We have an interest rate swap that is classified as a cash
flow hedge of our variable rate debt.
Cash flow hedges Our cash flow hedge is an interest rate swap under which we agree to
pay fixed rates of interest. We have no derivatives that are not accounted for as a hedging
instrument. The fair value amounts in the consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2009
were (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and other long-term |
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap |
|
Other Assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
liabilities |
|
$ |
1,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The derivative gains and losses in the consolidated statement of operations for the three months
ended September 30, 2009, related to our interest rate swap contract were as follows (in thousands):
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in |
|
Pretax Loss on Effective |
|
Ineffective Portion of |
|
|
Other Comprehensive |
|
Portion of Derivative |
|
Gain on Derivative and |
|
|
Income on Effective |
|
Reclassified from |
|
Amount Excluded from |
Derivatives in Cash Flow |
|
Portion of |
|
Accumulated Other |
|
Effectiveness Testing |
Hedging Relationships |
|
Derivative |
|
Comprehensive Loss |
|
Recognized in Income |
|
|
Amount |
|
Location |
|
Amount |
|
Location |
|
Amount |
Interest rate swap |
|
$ |
(133 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
The derivative gains and losses in the consolidated statement of operations for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, related to our interest rate swap contract was as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in |
|
Pretax Loss on Effective |
|
Ineffective Portion of |
|
|
Other Comprehensive |
|
Portion of Derivative |
|
Gain on Derivative and |
|
|
Income on Effective |
|
Reclassified from |
|
Amount Excluded from |
Derivatives in Cash Flow |
|
Portion of |
|
Accumulated Other |
|
Effectiveness Testing |
Hedging Relationships |
|
Derivative |
|
Comprehensive Loss |
|
Recognized in Income |
|
|
Amount |
|
Location |
|
Amount |
|
Location |
|
Amount |
Interest rate swap |
|
$ |
405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
The notional amount of the outstanding interest rate swap was $18,333,000. We made no
adjustments to the fair value of this derivative as a result of evaluating counterparty risk.
8. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The following tables present our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value
on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, and are categorized
using the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the
reliability of the inputs used to determine fair value. Level 1 refers to fair values
determined based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. Level 2 refers to
fair values estimated using significant other observable inputs, and Level 3 includes fair
values estimated using significant non-observable inputs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds |
|
$ |
2,209 |
|
|
$ |
2,209 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Treasury bills |
|
|
31,676 |
|
|
|
31,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction rate securities |
|
|
1,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
35,194 |
|
|
$ |
33,885 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap |
|
$ |
1,273 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,273 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
1,273 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,273 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds |
|
$ |
22,560 |
|
|
$ |
22,560 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Treasury bills |
|
|
9,090 |
|
|
|
9,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction rate securities |
|
|
1,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
32,959 |
|
|
$ |
31,650 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap |
|
$ |
1,678 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,678 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
1,678 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,678 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the auction rate securities was estimated utilizing a
discounted cash flow analysis. The discounted cash flow analysis considered,
among other items, the creditworthiness of the counterparty, the timing of
expected future cash flows, and the expectation of the next time the
security is expected to have a successful auction. The auction rate
securities were also compared to other observable market data with similar
characteristics to the securities held by the Company.
9. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Amortizable intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents |
|
$ |
3,650 |
|
|
$ |
3,650 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
1,958 |
|
|
|
1,655 |
|
Other identifiable intangibles |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,744 |
|
|
|
5,849 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(1,634 |
) |
|
|
(737 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,110 |
|
|
$ |
5,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $0.9 million.
The estimated future amortization expense for intangibles as of September 30, 2009 is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
Thereafter |
$407 |
|
$ |
1,208 |
|
|
$ |
1,208 |
|
|
$ |
929 |
|
|
$ |
318 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
10. PRODUCT WARRANTIES
The Company typically provides one to three-year parts and service warranties on lasers
and amplifiers. Most of the sales offices provide support to customers in their respective
geographic areas. Warranty reserves have been generally sufficient to cover product warranty
repair and replacement costs. The following table summarizes product warranty activity
recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Beginning balance January 1 |
|
$ |
3,223 |
|
|
$ |
1,957 |
|
Additions for current year deliveries |
|
|
1,959 |
|
|
|
2,484 |
|
Reductions for payments made |
|
|
(1,659 |
) |
|
|
(1,423 |
) |
Impact of foreign currency fluctuation |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance September 30 |
|
$ |
3,587 |
|
|
$ |
3,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
In November 2006, the Company was sued for patent infringement relating to certain
products, including but not limited to fiber lasers and fiber amplifiers. The plaintiff has
made a complaint for damages of over $10 million, treble damages for alleged willful
infringement and injunctive relief. The case is now in the discovery stages.
In February 2008, the Company was sued for patent infringement relating to two product
lines used in medical laser applications. The plaintiff has filed a complaint for unspecified
damages, treble damages for alleged willful infringement and injunctive relief. The patent
asserted in the lawsuit expired in April 2007. The case was stayed until October 2009 in
connection with a patent reexamination. The Company is seeking an extension of the stay.
The Company believes it has meritorious defenses and intends to vigorously contest the
claims. No loss is deemed probable at September 30, 2009 and no amounts have been accrued in
respect of these contingencies.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion in conjunction with our consolidated financial
statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This
discussion contains forward looking statements that are based on managements current
expectations, estimates and projections about our business and operations. Our actual results
may differ materially from those currently anticipated and expressed in such forward-looking
statements. See Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.
Overview
We develop and manufacture a broad line of high-performance fiber lasers, fiber
amplifiers and diode lasers for diverse applications in numerous markets. Our diverse lines
of low, mid and high-power lasers and amplifiers are used in materials processing, advanced,
communications and medical applications. We sell our products globally to original equipment
manufacturers, or OEMs, system integrators and end users. We market our products
internationally primarily through our direct sales force and also through agreements with
independent sales representatives and distributors.
We are vertically integrated such that we design and manufacture all key components used
in our finished products, from semiconductor diodes to optical fiber preforms, finished fiber
lasers and amplifiers. Since our formation in 1990, we have been focused on developing and
manufacturing high-power fiber lasers and amplifiers.
Factors and Trends That Affect Our Operations and Financial Results
In reading our financial statements, you should be aware of the following factors and
trends that our management believes are important in understanding our financial performance.
Net sales. Our net sales have historically fluctuated from quarter to quarter. The
increase or decrease in sales from a prior quarter can be affected by the timing of orders
received from customers, the shipment, installation and acceptance of products at our
customers facilities, the mix of OEM orders and one-time orders for products with large
purchase prices, and seasonal factors such as the purchasing patterns and levels of activity
throughout the year in the regions where we operate. Historically, our net sales have been
higher in the second half of the year than in the first half of the year. Furthermore, net
sales can be affected by the time taken to qualify our products for use in new applications
in the end markets that we serve. The adoption of our products by a new customer or
qualification in a new application can lead to an increase in net sales for a period, which
may then slow until we further penetrate new markets or obtain new customers. Our net sales
can also be affected from quarter to quarter by the general level of worldwide economic
activity, including economic expansion or contraction, and expenditures on capital equipment.
In general, increases in worldwide economic activity have a positive effect on our sales and
decreases in economic activity have a negative effect our sales.
Gross margin. Our total gross margin in any period can be affected by total net sales in
any period, product mix, that is, the percentage of our revenue in that period that is
attributable to higher or lower-power products, production volumes, changes to the sales
prices of our products in response to the competitive environment and by other factors, some
of which are not under our control. Our product mix affects our margins because the selling
price per watt is higher for low-power and mid-power devices than for high-power devices. The
overall cost of high-power lasers may be partially offset by improved absorption of fixed
overhead costs associated with sales of larger volumes of higher-power products.
Due to the fact that we have high fixed costs, our costs are generally difficult or slow
to adjust in response to changes in demand. In addition, our fixed costs increase as we
expand our capacity. Gross margins generally decline if production volumes are lower as a
result of a decrease in sales or inventory because the absorption of fixed manufacturing
costs will be reduced. Gross margins generally improve when the opposite occurs. In addition,
absorption of fixed costs can benefit gross margins due to an increase in production that is
not sold and placed into inventory. If both sales and inventory decrease in the same period,
the decline in gross margin may be magnified if we cannot reduce fixed costs or chose not to
reduce fixed costs to match the decrease in the level of production. We also regularly review
our inventory for items that are slow-moving, have been rendered obsolete or determined to be
excess. If we experience a decline in sales that reduces absorption of our fixed costs, or if
we have production issues or inventory write-downs, our gross margins will be negatively
affected.
Sales and marketing expense. We expect to continue to expand our worldwide direct sales
organization, build and expand applications centers, hire additional personnel involved in
marketing in our existing and new geographic locations, increase the number of units used for
demonstration purposes and otherwise increase expenditures on sales and marketing activities
in order to support the growth in our net sales. As such, we expect that our sales and
marketing expenses will increase in the aggregate.
12
Research and development expense. We plan to continue to invest in research and
development to improve our existing components and products and develop new components and
products. We plan to increase the personnel involved in research and development and expect
to increase other research and development expenses. As such, we expect that our research and
development expenses will increase in the aggregate.
General and administrative expense. We expect our general and administrative expenses to
increase moderately as we continue to invest in systems and resources to support our
worldwide operations. Legal expenses vary from quarter to quarter based upon the stage of
litigation, including patent re-examinations and termination of litigation stays but could
increase in response to any future litigation or due to a change in status of current
intellectual property matters. The timing and amount of legal expenses may vary substantially
from quarter to quarter.
Major customers. We have historically depended on a few customers for a large percentage
of our annual net sales. The composition of this group can change from year to year. Net
sales derived from our five largest customers as a percentage of our annual net sales were
29% in 2006, 20% in 2007, 17% in 2008, and 12% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
We seek to add new customers and to expand our relationships with existing customers. We
anticipate that the composition of our net sales to our significant customers will continue
to change. If any of our significant customers were to substantially reduce their purchases
from us, our results would be adversely affected. Our sales have been affected recently by a
substantial reduction in purchases of pulsed lasers from several customers, including one
that was formerly our largest customer for several years.
Results of Operations for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the three
months ended September 30, 2008
Overview. The worldwide economic downturn continued to negatively affect our results of
operations for the three months ended September 30, 2009 as we experience continued weakness
across many of our end markets, especially in materials processing. We continue to have
limited longer term visibility to end market demand. Until end market demand becomes
clearer, we will continue to focus on controlling costs and capital expenditures and reducing
inventories in order to maximize cash flow. At the same time, we plan to continue to build on
our technology by investing in new sales and application personnel and R&D for new products.
Net sales. Net sales decreased by $16.2 million, or 26.1%, to $45.8 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 from $62.0 million for the three months ended September
30, 2008. This decrease was attributable to lower sales of fiber lasers in materials
processing applications, where net sales decreased by $16.0 million or 31.4% and
communications applications, where net sales decreased by $2.3 million or 53.6%. These
decreases were partially offset by the increases in advanced applications, where net sales
increased by $1.7 million, or 33.4%, and medical applications, where net sales increased by
$0.4 million or 24.0%. The decrease in materials processing sales resulted from lower sales
of high and medium power lasers and pulsed lasers used in welding, marking, engraving and
drilling applications. The decrease in communications applications sales resulted primarily
from decreased sales of amplifiers, particularly in Russia. The increase in sales of advanced
applications was due to higher sales of high power lasers used in government and defense
research and pulsed and low power lasers used for sensing and optical pumping applications.
The increase in medical is due to the increased demand from our established customer in the
US and new OEM customers.
Cost of sales and gross margin. Cost of sales decreased by $3.5 million, or 10.8%, to
$29.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from $32.6 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2008. Our gross margin decreased to 36.5% for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 from 47.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The
decrease in gross margin was the result of less favorable absorption of our fixed
manufacturing costs due to a decline in sales volume, less favorable product mix due to lower
sales of medium power lasers and reduction of inventory as well as lower sales prices due to
pricing pressure caused by the industry-wide reduction in demand. These cost of sales
increases were partially offset by a reduction in manufacturing expenses in the period
primarily related to reduced salaries and benefits expense and other manufacturing overhead.
Expenses related to inventory reserves and other valuation adjustments decreased by $0.4
million to $1.3 million or 2.8% of sales for the three months ended September 30, 2009 as
compared to $1.7 million or 2.7% of sales for the three months ended September 30, 2008.
Sales and marketing expense. Sales and marketing expense increased by $0.1 million, or
1.4%, to $3.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from $3.7 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2008, primarily as a result of an increase in selling
expenses related to depreciation of units used for demonstration purposes. As a percentage of
sales, sales and marketing expense increased to 8.3% for the three months ended September 30,
2009 from 6.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2008. As we continue to expand our
worldwide sales organization, we expect expenditures on sales and marketing to continue to
increase in the aggregate although the near term increases may be more moderate.
Research and development expense. Research and development expense increased by $0.5
million, or 10.6%, to $4.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from $4.1
million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. This increase was primarily due to an
increase of $0.2 million in material costs. Research and development activity continues to
focus on enhancing the performance of our internally manufactured components, refining
production processes to improve manufacturing yields, the development of new products
operating at different wavelengths and higher output powers and new complimentary accessories
used with our products. As a percentage of sales, research and development expense increased
to 10.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from 6.7% for the three months ended
September 30, 2008.
General and administrative expense. General and administrative expense decreased by $1.3
million, or 21.5%, to $4.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from $6.1
million for the three months ended September 30, 2008, primarily due to a
13
decrease of $0.9 million in bad debt, accounting, legal and contractor expenses. As a percentage of sales,
general and administrative expense increased to 10.4% for the three months ended September
30, 2009 from 9.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2008. We expect that legal
expenses will increase in future quarters in connection with defending two patent
infringement actions against the Company.
Effect of exchange rates on Sales, Gross Margin and Operating Expenses. We estimate
that if exchange rates had been the same as one year ago, our third quarter 2009 sales would
have been $0.2 million higher, gross margin would have been $0.6 million higher and operating
expenses in total would have been $0.2 million higher.
Gain on foreign exchange. Gain on foreign exchange decreased by $1.6 million to almost
no gain or loss for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from a gain of $1.6
million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and was primarily attributable to the
stabilization of the Russian Ruble and appreciation of Japanese Yen and Korean Won against
the U.S. Dollar off-set by the depreciation of the U.S. Dollar against the Euro.
Interest expense. Interest expense, net was $0.3 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to $0.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008.
The change in interest expense resulted from increased utilization of credit lines.
Provision for income taxes. Provision for income taxes was $1.0 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $5.3 million for the three months ended September
30, 2008, representing an effective tax rate of 31.5% for both the three months ended
September 30, 2009 and 31.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2008.
Net income attributable to IPG Photonics Corporation. Net income attributable to IPG
Photonics Corporation decreased by $8.6 million to $2.3 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 from $10.9 million in income for the three months ended September 30,
2008. Net income attributable to IPG Photonics Corporation as a percentage of our net sales
decreased by 12.7 percentage points to 4.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2009
from 17.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 due to the factors described above.
Results of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine
months ended September 30, 2008
Overview. The worldwide economic downturn continued to negatively affect our results of
operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as we experience continued weakness
across many of our end markets, especially in materials processing. We continue to have
limited longer term visibility to end market demand. Until end market demand becomes
clearer, we will continue to focus on controlling costs and capital expenditures and reducing
inventories in order to maximize cash flow. At the same time, we plan to continue to build on
our technology by investing in new sales and application personnel and R&D for new products.
Net sales. Net sales decreased by $39.3 million, or 23.0%, to $131.6 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $170.9 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2008. This decrease was attributable to lower sales of fiber lasers in materials
processing applications, where net sales decreased by $42.3 million or 29.8% and a decrease
in communications applications, where net sales decreased by $2.3 million or 23.6%. These
decreases were partially offset by the increases sales of advanced applications, where net
sales increased by $3.7 million or 23.0% and in medical applications, where net sales
increased by $1.7 million, or 57.0%. The decrease in materials processing applications
resulted from substantially decreased sales of pulsed lasers and medium-power lasers used in
marking, engraving and drilling applications. The decrease in communications applications
sales resulted primarily from decreased sales of amplifiers, particularly in Russia. The
increase in sales of advanced applications was due to higher sales of high power lasers used
in government and defense research and pulsed and low power lasers used for sensing and
optical pumping applications. The increase in medical is due to the increased demand from our
established customer in the US and new OEM customers.
Cost of sales and gross margin. Cost of sales decreased by $2.9 million, or 3.2%, to
$87.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $90.1 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008. Our gross margin decreased to 33.7% for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 from 47.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The
decrease in gross margin was the result of less favorable absorption of our fixed
manufacturing costs due to a decline in sales volume, less favorable product mix due to lower
sales of medium power lasers, a reduction in inventory, increases in charges related to
inventory write-downs and lower prices due to pricing pressure caused by the industry-wide
reduction in demand. These cost of sales increases were offset partially by a reduction in
manufacturing expenses in the period, primarily, related to reduced salaries and benefits
expense and other manufacturing supplies. Expenses related to inventory reserves and other
valuation adjustments increased by $2.3 million to $5.6 million, or 4.3%, of sales for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to $3.3 million, or 1.9%, of sales for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Sales and marketing expense. Sales and marketing expense increased by $0.3 million, or
2.6%, to $10.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $10.6 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, primarily as a result of an increase in selling and
depreciation expenses. As a percentage of sales, sales and marketing expense increased to
8.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from 6.2% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. As we continue to expand our worldwide sales organization, we expect expenditures on sales and marketing to continue to
increase in the aggregate although the near term increases may be more moderate.
Research and development expense. Research and development expense increased by $1.9
million, or 17.4%, to $13.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $11.5
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. This increase was
14
primarily due to an increase of $1.2 million in material costs. Research and development activity continues to
focus on enhancing the performance of our internally manufactured components, refining
production processes to improve manufacturing yields, the development of new products
operating at different wavelengths and higher output powers and new complimentary accessories
used with our products. As a percentage of sales, research and development expense increased
to 10.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from 6.7% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008.
General and administrative expense. General and administrative expense decreased by $3.5
million, or 19.5%, to $14.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $18.2
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, primarily due to a decrease of $1.6
million decrease in accounting and legal defense fees and a $1.8 million decrease in
personnel and contractor expenses. We expect that legal expenses will increase in future
quarters in connection with defending two patent infringement actions against the
Company. As a percentage of sales, general and administrative expense increased to 11.2% for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from 10.7% for the nine months ended September 30,
2008.
Effect of exchange rates on Sales, Gross Margin and Operating Expenses. We estimate
that if exchange rates had been the same as one year ago, sales for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 would have been $4.2 million higher, gross margin would have been $2.5
million higher and operating expenses in total would have been $1.5 million higher.
Loss (gain) on foreign exchange. Loss (gain) on foreign exchange increased by $2.9
million to a loss of $1.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
from a gain of $1.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and was primarily
attributable to the depreciation of the Russian Ruble and Euro against the U.S. Dollar.
Interest expense. Interest expense, net was $1.0 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to $0.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The
change in interest expense resulted from higher interest expense due to increased utilization
of credit lines.
Provision for income taxes. Provision for income taxes was $1.0 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $13.4 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2008, representing an effective tax rate of 31.5% for both the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Net income attributable to IPG Photonics Corporation. Net income attributable to IPG
Photonics Corporation decreased by $25.3 million to $2.3 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 from $27.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Net
income attributable to IPG Photonics Corporation as a percentage of our net sales decreased
by 14.4 percentage points to 1.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from 16.1% for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 due to the factors described above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of liquidity as of September 30, 2009 consisted of cash and cash
equivalents of $76.3 million, unused credit lines and overdraft facilities of $47.6 million
and working capital (excluding cash) of $61.5 million. This compares to cash and cash
equivalents of $51.3 million, unused overdraft facilities of $40.9 million and working
capital (excluding cash) of $80.7 million as of December 31, 2008. The increase in cash and
cash equivalents of $25.0 million from December 31, 2008 relates primarily to cash provided
by operating activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 of $37.7 million,
partially offset by capital expenditures of $9.6 million, net repayments of our credit lines
of $4.4 million and the acquisition of non-controlling interests
totaling $0.5 million.
We held approximately $1.3 million in auction-rate securities (ARSs) at September 30,
2009, all of which is included in other long-term assets. Our investments in ARSs at
September 30, 2009 consisted solely of taxable municipal debt securities which are classified
as long-term available for sale securities due to continued auction failures.
Our long-term debt consists of an $18.3 million secured variable-rate note which matures
in July 2013. The note is secured by a mortgage on real estate and buildings in
Massachusetts. We expect that the existing cash and marketable securities, our cash flows
from operations and our existing lines of credit will be sufficient to meet our liquidity and
capital needs for the foreseeable future. Our future long-term capital requirements will
depend on many factors including our rate of net sales growth, the timing and extent of
spending to support development efforts, the expansion of our sales and marketing activities,
the timing and introductions of new products, the need to ensure access to adequate
manufacturing capacity and the continuing market acceptance of our products. We have made no
arrangements to obtain additional financing, and there is no assurance that such additional
financing, if required or desired, will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us,
if at all.
15
The following table details our line of credit facilities as of September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Total Facility |
|
Interest Rate |
|
Maturity |
|
Security |
U.S. Revolving
Line of Credit
|
|
$35 million
|
|
LIBOR plus 0.8% to 1.2%,
depending on the Companys
performance
|
|
July 2011
|
|
Unsecured |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro Credit
Facility
(Germany) (1)
|
|
Euro 15.0 million
($21.9 million)
|
|
Euribor + 1.0% or EONIA + 1.5%
|
|
September 2010
|
|
Unsecured,
guaranteed by
parent company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro Overdraft
Facilities
|
|
Euro 3.2 million
($4.6 million)
|
|
2.82%-6.95%
|
|
Between September
2009 and March
2010
|
|
Common pool of
assets of German
and Italian
subsidiaries |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
$4.0 million of this credit facility is available to our Russian subsidiary and $1.3 million is available to our Italian subsidiary |
The Company is required to meet certain financial covenants associated with its U.S.
revolving line of credit and long term debt facilities. These covenants, tested quarterly,
include a debt service coverage ratio and a funded debt to earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) ratio. The debt service coverage covenant requires
that we maintain a trailing twelve month ratio of cash flow to debt service that is greater
than 1.5:1. Debt service is defined as required principal and interest payments during the
period. Cash flow is defined as EBITDA less unfunded capital expenditures. For trailing
twelve month periods until September 2010, up to $15.0 million of our capital expenditures
are treated as being funded from the proceeds of our initial public offering. The funded debt
to EBITDA covenant requires that the sum of all indebtedness for borrowed money on a
consolidated basis be less than two times our trailing twelve months EBITDA. We were in
compliance with all such financial covenants as of September 30, 2009.
The financial covenants in our loan documents may cause us to not take or to delay
investments and actions that we might otherwise undertake because of limits on capital
expenditures and amounts that we can borrow or lease. In the event that we do not comply with
any one of these covenants, we would be in default under the loan agreement or loan
agreements, which may result in acceleration of the debt, cross-defaults on other debt or a
reduction in available liquidity, any of which could harm our results of operations and
financial condition.
Operating activities. Net cash provided by operating activities in the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 increased by $12.7 million to $37.7 million from $25.0 million in the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and primarily resulted from:
|
|
|
A decrease in inventory of $2.8 million in 2009 compared to an
increase of inventory of $21.8 million in 2008; |
|
|
|
|
A decrease in accounts receivable of $10.7 million in 2009
compared to an increase of $6.2 million in 2008; partially offset by |
|
|
|
|
A decrease in cash provided by net income after adding back
non-cash charges of $23.9 million in 2009 as compared to 2008. |
Given our vertical integration, rigorous and time-consuming testing procedures for both
internally manufactured and externally purchased components and the lead time required to
manufacture components used in our finished product, the rate at which we turn inventory has
historically been low when compared to our cost of sales. We do not expect this to change
significantly in the future and believe that we will have to maintain a relatively high level
of inventory compared to our cost of sales. As a result, we continue to expect to have a
significant amount of working capital invested in inventory.
Investing activities. Net cash used in investing activities was $9.5 million and $23.8
million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The cash used in
investing activities in the first nine months of 2009 was related to capital expenditures on
property, plant and equipment. The cash used in investing activities in the first nine months
of 2008 was primarily related to capital expenditures on property, plant and equipment and
intangible assets of $29.5 million, partially offset by $5.5 million of proceeds from sale of
marketable securities. In 2009 and 2008, capital expenditures in the United States, Germany,
and Russia related to facilities and equipment for diode wafer growth, burn-in test stations
and packaging as well as new fiber assembly and component production facilities. We expect
capital expenditures to be lower than $15 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The
timing and extent of any capital expenditures in and between periods can have a significant
effect on our cash flow. Many of the capital expenditure projects that we undertake have long
lead times and are difficult to cancel or defer, with the result that it would be difficult
to defer such committed capital expenditures to a later period.
Financing activities. Net cash used by financing activities was $3.8 million in the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to cash provided by financing activities of $5.6
million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The cash used by financing activities in
2009 was primarily related to the net repayments of $4.4 million from the use of our credit
lines and by cash used to purchase non-controlling interests of $0.5 million, partially
offset by $2.1 million of exercise of employee stock options and
related tax benefits. The cash provided by
financing activities in 2008 was primarily related to the net proceeds of $4.4 million from
the use of our credit lines.
16
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within
the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and we intend that such forward-looking statements be subject to the
safe harbors created thereby. For this purpose, any statements contained in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q except for historical information are forward-looking statements. Without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, words such as may, will, expect, believe,
anticipate, intend, could, estimate, or continue or the negative or other
variations thereof or comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking
statements. In addition, any statements that refer to projections of our future financial
performance, trends in our businesses, or other characterizations of future events or
circumstances are forward-looking statements.
The forward-looking statements included herein are based on current expectations of our
management based on available information and involve a number of risks and uncertainties,
all of which are difficult or impossible to accurately predict and many of which are beyond
our control. As such, our actual results may differ significantly from those expressed in any
forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause or contribute to such differences include,
but are not limited to, those discussed in more detail in Item 1, Business and Item 1A,
Risk Factors of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2008. Readers should carefully review these risks, as well as the additional risks described
in other documents we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In
light of the significant risks and uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking information
included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation
by us or any other person that such results will be achieved, and readers are cautioned not
to rely on such forward-looking information. We undertake no obligation to revise the
forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect events or circumstances after the date
hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements in Part I, Item 1
for information related to recent accounting pronouncements.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to market risk in the ordinary course of business, which consists
primarily of interest rate risk associated with our cash and cash equivalents and our
debt and foreign exchange rate risk.
Interest rate risk. Our investments have limited exposure to market risk. To
minimize this risk, we maintain a portfolio of cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments, consisting primarily of bank deposits, money market funds and short-term
government funds. The interest rates are variable and fluctuate with current market
conditions. Because of the short-term nature of these instruments, a sudden change in
market interest rates would not be expected to have a material impact on our financial
condition or results of operations.
Our exposure to market risk also relates to the increase or decrease in the amount
of interest expense we must pay on our bank debt and borrowings on our bank credit
facilities. The interest rates for our U.S. revolving line of credit and our Euro credit
facility are variable. The rates on our Euro overdraft facilities in Germany and Italy
and our Japanese Yen overdraft facility are fixed for twelve-month periods. The interest
rate on our other bank debt is currently fixed through interest-rate swaps. Approximately
54% of our outstanding debt had a fixed rate of interest as of September 30, 2009. We do
not believe that a 10% change in market interest rates would have a material impact on
our financial position or results of operations.
Exchange rates. Due to our international operations, a significant portion of our
net sales, cost of sales and operating expenses are denominated in currencies other than
the U.S. dollar, principally the Euro, the Japanese Yen and the Russian Ruble. As a
result, our international operations give rise to transactional market risk associated
with exchange rate movements of the U.S. dollar, the Euro, the Japanese Yen and the
Russian Ruble. Gains and losses on foreign exchange transactions had no significant
impact on the financial results for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and totaled
a $1.6 million gain for the three months ended September 30, 2008. Gains and losses on
foreign exchange transactions totaled a $1.0 million loss for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and a $1.9 million gain for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Management believes that the use of foreign currency financial instruments reduces the
risks of certain foreign currency transactions; however, these instruments provide only
limited protection. We will continue to analyze our exposure to currency exchange rate
fluctuations and may engage in additional financial hedging techniques in the future to
attempt to minimize the effect of these potential fluctuations. Exchange rate
fluctuations may adversely affect our financial results in the future. No foreign
currency derivative instruments were outstanding at September 30, 2009.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
17
Under the supervision of our chief executive officer and our chief financial
officer, our management has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of
our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)),
as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the
Evaluation Date). Based upon that evaluation, our chief executive officer and our
chief financial officer have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure
controls and procedures are effective.
Changes in Internal Controls
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act) that occurred during
the last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, we are party to various legal proceedings and other disputes
incidental to our business. There have been no material developments in the second quarter of
2009 with respect to those proceedings previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, except as follows:
In July 2009, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) confirmed the
patentability of all of the claims in the IMRA America Inc., patent over the prior art cited
in the reexamination, as well as of new claims added during the reexamination. The USPTO
issued a reexamination certificate in October 2009. As result, the U.S. District Court for
the Eastern District of Michigan lifted the stay on the litigation. A trial is scheduled for
August 2010 and discovery has recommenced.
In June 2009, we submitted an additional reexamination request to the USPTO with respect
to a patent asserted by CardioFocus Inc. against us. This request also been granted by the
USPTO. The USPTO issued further office actions in July 2009 on the two patents not expressly
asserted against us in the complaint, but that were referred to in the subsequent
infringement allegations against us. All of the claims of one of the two patents were
rejected, as were all but three claims of the other patent, the patentability of which was
confirmed. The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts has stayed the
litigation until the earlier of October 2009 or the conclusion of the re-examination. The
Court indicated that it will consider extending the stay for up to an additional year for
good cause shown. We and the other defendants have requested that the Court extend the stay
until the earlier of October 2010 or the conclusion of the re-examinations.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully
consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, which could materially affect our
business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q are not the only risks facing our
Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we
currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition and/or operating results.
We are subject to litigation alleging that we are infringing third-party intellectual
property rights. Intellectual property claims could result in costly litigation and harm our
business.
In recent years, there has been significant litigation involving intellectual property
rights in many technology-based industries, including our own. We face risks and
uncertainties in connection with such litigation, including the risk that patents issued to
others may harm our ability to do business; that there could be existing patents of which we
are unaware that could be pertinent to our business; and that it is not possible for us to
know whether there are patent applications pending that our products might infringe upon,
since patent applications often are not disclosed until a patent is issued or published.
Moreover, the frequency with which new patents are granted and the diversity of jurisdictions
in which they are granted make it impractical and expensive for us to monitor all patents
that may be relevant to our business.
From time to time, we have been notified of allegations and claims that we may be
infringing patents or intellectual property rights owned by third parties. In 2007, we
settled two patent infringement lawsuits filed against us. We are presently defending two
patent infringement lawsuits. In November 2006, IMRA America, Inc. filed an action against us
alleging that certain products we produce, including but not limited to our continuous wave
and pulsed fiber lasers and fiber amplifiers, which account for a significant portion of our
revenues, infringe one U.S. patent allegedly owned by IMRA America. IMRA America alleges
willful infringement and seeks damages of at least $10 million, treble damages and injunctive
relief. IMRA America also alleges inducement of infringement and contributory infringement.
We filed an answer in which we denied infringement and raised additional defenses that the
patent is
invalid and unenforceable. In addition, we filed declaratory judgment counterclaims
based on these three defenses. This lawsuit
18
concerns products made, used, sold or offered
for sale in or imported into the United States and therefore the lawsuit affects products
that account for a substantial portion of our revenues. This lawsuit does not affect revenues
that are derived from products that are not made, used, sold or offered for sale in or
imported into the United States. In June 2008, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
ordered re-examination of the patent claims asserted by IMRA America against the Company
based on several prior art references that we submitted in an ex parte re-examination
request. In July 2009, the USPTO confirmed the patentability of all of the claims in the IMRA
America patent over the prior art cited in the reexamination, as well as of new claims added
during the reexamination. The USPTO issued a reexamination certificate in October 2009. As
result, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan lifted the stay on the
litigation. A trial is scheduled for August 2010 and discovery has recommenced. In August
2009, IPG submitted an additional reexamination request, which is being reviewed by the
USPTO.
In February 2008, CardioFocus Inc. filed an action against us and other co-defendants
alleging that our erbium and thulium fiber lasers infringe one patent allegedly owned by
CardioFocus and seeks unspecified damages, treble damages and attorneys fees for alleged
willful infringement. The plaintiff also alleges inducement of infringement. The patent
claims generally relate to a system for transmitting laser energy via an optical fiber to a
surgical site. The patent expired in April 2007. We filed an answer in which we denied
infringement and raised additional defenses that the patent is invalid and unenforceable. In
addition, we filed declaratory judgment counterclaims based on these three defenses.
CardioFocus subsequently alleged that the Company infringes claims of two additional patents
and we are investigating a response to such allegations. We and several of our co-defendants
filed reexamination requests, which were granted by the USPTO. In two office actions in
November 2008, the USPTO rejected all of the claims of the CardioFocus patents alleged to be
infringed. In February 2009, CardioFocus responded to the USPTO office actions, and in June
2009, we submitted an additional reexamination request to the USPTO, which request has also
been granted. The USPTO issued further office actions in July 2009 on the two patents not
expressly asserted against the Company in the Complaint, but that were referred to in the
subsequent infringement allegations against the Company. All of the claims of one of the two
patents were rejected, as were all but three claims of the other patent, the patentability of
which was confirmed. The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts has stayed the
litigation until the earlier of October 2009 or the conclusion of the re-examinations. The
Court indicated that it will consider extending the stay for up to an additional year for
good cause shown. We and the other defendants have requested that the Court extend the stay
until the earlier of October 2010 or the conclusion of the re-examinations. Discovery has not
yet commenced.
Several outcomes are possible from the ongoing re-examinations, including the
cancellation or confirmation of one or more of the current claims of the patents.
Furthermore, with regard to any unexpired patents in re-examination, the current claims can
be amended, and new claims can be added, provided that such amendments and additions do not
enlarge the overall scope of the claims. An adverse outcome in a USPTO re-examination could
have an adverse impact on our defenses in our litigation with IMRA America and/or
CardioFocus.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to amicably dispose of our pending
litigation with IMRA America or CardioFocus, claims or other allegations made against us
and claims that may be asserted in the future. The outcome of any litigation, including
the pending litigation, is uncertain, as is the outcome of the re-examination of the
CardioFocus patent. Even if we ultimately are successful on the merits of any such
litigation or re-examination, legal and administrative proceedings related to
intellectual property are typically expensive and time-consuming, generate negative
publicity and divert financial and managerial resources. Some litigants may have greater
financial resources than we have and may be able to sustain the costs of complex
intellectual property litigation more easily than we can.
If we do not prevail in any intellectual property litigation brought against us,
including the lawsuits brought by IMRA America and CardioFocus, it could affect our ability
to sell our products and materially harm our business, financial condition and results of
operations. These developments could adversely affect our ability to compete for customers
and increase our revenues. Plaintiffs in intellectual property cases often seek, and
sometimes obtain, injunctive relief. Intellectual property litigation commenced against us,
including the lawsuits brought by IMRA America and CardioFocus that we are presently
defending, could force us to take actions that could be harmful to our business, competitive
position, results of operations and financial condition, including the following:
|
|
|
stop selling our products or using the technology
that contains the allegedly infringing intellectual
property; |
|
|
|
|
pay actual monetary damages, royalties, lost profits
or increased damages and the plaintiffs attorneys fees,
which individually or in the aggregate may be substantial; |
|
|
|
|
attempt to obtain a license to use the relevant
intellectual property, which may not be available on
reasonable terms or at all; and |
|
|
|
|
attempt to redesign the products that allegedly
infringed upon intellectual property of others, which may be
costly or impractical. |
19
In addition, intellectual property lawsuits can be brought by third parties against OEMs
and end users that incorporate our products into their systems or processes. In some cases,
we indemnify OEMs against third-party infringement claims relating to our products and we
often make representations affirming, among other things, that our products do not infringe
on the intellectual property rights of others. As a result, we may incur liabilities in
connection with lawsuits against our customers. Any such lawsuits, whether or not they have
merit, could be time-consuming to defend, damage our reputation or result in substantial and
unanticipated costs.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 1350 |
20
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPG PHOTONICS CORPORATION
|
|
Date: November 6, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Valentin P. Gapontsev
|
|
|
|
Valentin P. Gapontsev |
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 6, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Timothy P.V. Mammen
|
|
|
|
Timothy P.V. Mammen |
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
21