e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 001-14793
FIRST BANCORP.
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
|
|
|
Puerto Rico
|
|
66-0561882 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
identification number) |
|
|
|
1519 Ponce de León Avenue, Stop 23
|
|
|
Santurce, Puerto Rico
|
|
00908 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
(787) 729-8200
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer
and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer þ |
|
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
Common stock: 92,542,722 outstanding as of July 31, 2010.
FIRST BANCORP.
INDEX PAGE
2
Forward Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in this Form 10-Q or future
filings by First BanCorp (the Corporation) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC),
in the Corporations press releases, in other public or stockholder communications, or in oral
statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer, the word or phrases would
be, will allow, intends to, will likely result, are expected to, should, anticipate
and similar expressions are meant to identify forward-looking statements.
First BanCorp wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made, and represent First BanCorps
expectations of future conditions or results and are not guarantees of future performance. First
BanCorp advises readers that various factors could cause actual results to differ materially from
those contained in any forward-looking statement. Such factors include, but are not limited to,
the following:
|
|
|
uncertainty about whether the Corporation will be able to fully comply with the written
agreement dated June 3, 2010 (the Agreement) that the Corporation entered into with the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the FED) and the order dated June 2, 2010 (the Order
and collectively with the Agreement, the Agreements) that the Corporations banking
subsidiary, FirstBank Puerto Rico (FirstBank or the Bank) entered into with the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Office of the Commissioner of Financial
Institutions of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (OCIF) that, among other things, require
the Bank to attain certain capital levels and reduce its special mention, classified,
delinquent and non-accrual assets; |
|
|
|
|
uncertainty as to whether the Corporation will be able to meet the conditions necessary
to compel the United States Department of the Treasury (the U.S. Treasury) to convert
into Common Stock the shares of the Corporations preferred stock that the Corporation
issued to the U.S. Treasury; |
|
|
|
|
uncertainty as to whether the Corporation will be able to complete future
capital-raising efforts; |
|
|
|
|
the risk of being subject to possible additional regulatory action, including as a
result of an inability to implement the capital plans submitted in accordance with the
Agreements; |
|
|
|
|
the strength or weakness of the real estate market and of the consumer and commercial
credit sector and their impact on the credit quality of the Corporations loans and other
assets, including the construction and commercial real estate loan portfolios, which have
contributed and may continue to contribute to, among other things, the increase in the
levels of non-performing assets, charge-offs and the provision expense; |
|
|
|
|
adverse changes in general economic conditions in the United States and in Puerto Rico,
including the interest rate scenario, market liquidity, housing absorption rates, real
estate prices and disruptions in the U.S. capital markets, which may reduce interest
margins, impact funding sources and affect demand for all of the Corporations products and
services and the value of the Corporations assets; |
|
|
|
|
the Corporations reliance on brokered certificates of deposit and its ability to
obtain, on a periodic basis, approval to issue brokered certificates of deposit to fund
operations and provide liquidity in accordance with the terms of the Order; |
|
|
|
|
an adverse change in the Corporations ability to attract new clients and retain
existing ones; |
|
|
|
|
a decrease in demand for the Corporations products and services and lower revenues and
earnings because of the continued recession in Puerto Rico, the recently announced
consolidation of the banking industry in Puerto Rico and the current fiscal problems and
budget deficit of the Puerto Rico government; |
|
|
|
|
a need to recognize additional impairments of financial instruments or goodwill
relating to acquisitions; |
|
|
|
|
uncertainty about regulatory and legislative changes for financial services companies
in Puerto Rico, the United States and the U.S. and British Virgin Islands, which could
affect the Corporations financial performance and could cause the Corporations actual
results for future periods to differ materially from prior results and anticipated or
projected results; |
|
|
|
|
uncertainty about the effectiveness of the various actions undertaken to stimulate the
U.S. economy and stabilize the U.S. financial markets, and the impact such actions may have
on the Corporations business, financial condition and results of operations; |
3
|
|
|
changes in the fiscal and monetary policies and regulations of the federal government,
including those determined by the FED, the FDIC, government-sponsored housing agencies and
local regulators in Puerto Rico and the U.S. and British Virgin Islands; |
|
|
|
|
the risk that the FDIC may further increase the deposit insurance premium and/or
require special assessments to replenish its insurance fund, causing an additional increase
in the Corporations non-interest expense; |
|
|
|
|
risks of not being able to generate sufficient income to realize the benefit of the
deferred tax asset; |
|
|
|
|
risks of not being able to recover the assets pledged to Lehman Brothers Special
Financing, Inc.; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the Corporations expenses associated with acquisitions and dispositions; |
|
|
|
|
developments in technology; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of Doral Financial Corporations financial condition on the repayment of its
outstanding secured loans to the Corporation; |
|
|
|
|
risks associated with further downgrades in the credit ratings of the Corporations
securities; |
|
|
|
|
general competitive factors and industry consolidation; and |
|
|
|
|
the possible future dilution to holders of the Corporations Common Stock resulting
from additional issuances of Common Stock or securities convertible into Common Stock. |
The Corporation does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to update any
of the forward- looking statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or
circumstances after the date of such statements except as required by the federal securities laws.
Investors should refer to the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009 as well as Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors, in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for a discussion of such factors and certain risks and uncertainties to which the
Corporation is subject.
4
FIRST BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for share information) |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
523,047 |
|
|
$ |
679,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
5,066 |
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
Time deposits with other financial institutions |
|
|
1,588 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
Other short-term investments |
|
|
15,390 |
|
|
|
22,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total money market investments |
|
|
22,044 |
|
|
|
24,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities pledged that can be repledged |
|
|
2,342,398 |
|
|
|
3,021,028 |
|
Other investment securities |
|
|
1,612,512 |
|
|
|
1,149,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available for sale |
|
|
3,954,910 |
|
|
|
4,170,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities held to maturity, at amortized cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities pledged that can be repledged |
|
|
333,581 |
|
|
|
400,925 |
|
Other investment securities |
|
|
199,721 |
|
|
|
200,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities held to maturity, fair value of $562,334
(December 31, 2009 $621,584) |
|
|
533,302 |
|
|
|
601,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other equity securities |
|
|
69,843 |
|
|
|
69,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of allowance for loan and lease losses of $604,304
(December 31, 2009 $528,120) |
|
|
11,898,808 |
|
|
|
13,400,331 |
|
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market |
|
|
100,626 |
|
|
|
20,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net |
|
|
11,999,434 |
|
|
|
13,421,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
207,440 |
|
|
|
197,965 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
72,358 |
|
|
|
69,304 |
|
Accrued interest receivable on loans and investments |
|
|
66,390 |
|
|
|
79,867 |
|
Due from customers on acceptances |
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
954 |
|
Accounts receivable from investment sales |
|
|
319,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
346,760 |
|
|
|
312,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
18,116,023 |
|
|
$ |
19,628,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
715,166 |
|
|
$ |
697,022 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
12,012,409 |
|
|
|
11,972,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
12,727,575 |
|
|
|
12,669,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
900,000 |
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
2,584,438 |
|
|
|
3,076,631 |
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) |
|
|
940,440 |
|
|
|
978,440 |
|
Notes payable (including $10,504 and $13,361 measured at fair value
as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively) |
|
|
24,059 |
|
|
|
27,117 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
231,959 |
|
|
|
231,959 |
|
Bank acceptances outstanding |
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
954 |
|
Accounts payable from investment purchases |
|
|
8,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
159,752 |
|
|
|
145,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
16,677,734 |
|
|
|
18,029,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, authorized 50,000,000 shares: issued and
outstanding 22,404,000 shares at an aggregate liquidation value of $950,100 |
|
|
930,830 |
|
|
|
928,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $1 par value, authorized 750,000,000 shares;
issued 102,440,522 |
|
|
102,440 |
|
|
|
102,440 |
|
Less: Treasury stock (at cost) |
|
|
(9,898 |
) |
|
|
(9,898 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock outstanding, 92,542,722 shares outstanding |
|
|
92,542 |
|
|
|
92,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
134,270 |
|
|
|
134,223 |
|
Legal surplus |
|
|
299,006 |
|
|
|
299,006 |
|
(Accumulated deficit) retained earnings |
|
|
(81,670 |
) |
|
|
118,291 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax expense of $11,755 (December 31, 2009 $4,628) |
|
|
63,311 |
|
|
|
26,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholdersequity |
|
|
1,438,289 |
|
|
|
1,599,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholdersequity |
|
$ |
18,116,023 |
|
|
$ |
19,628,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
5
FIRST BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF LOSS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Six-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(In thousands, except per share information) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
175,070 |
|
|
$ |
185,318 |
|
|
$ |
352,503 |
|
|
$ |
373,263 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
39,170 |
|
|
|
67,345 |
|
|
|
82,289 |
|
|
|
137,632 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
214,864 |
|
|
|
252,780 |
|
|
|
435,852 |
|
|
|
511,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
63,766 |
|
|
|
79,458 |
|
|
|
129,732 |
|
|
|
174,768 |
|
Loans payable |
|
|
1,265 |
|
|
|
614 |
|
|
|
3,442 |
|
|
|
960 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
25,035 |
|
|
|
29,015 |
|
|
|
50,317 |
|
|
|
59,160 |
|
Advances from FHLB |
|
|
7,587 |
|
|
|
8,317 |
|
|
|
15,281 |
|
|
|
16,609 |
|
Notes payable and other borrowings |
|
|
(1,851 |
) |
|
|
4,362 |
|
|
|
1,155 |
|
|
|
6,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
95,802 |
|
|
|
121,766 |
|
|
|
199,927 |
|
|
|
258,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
119,062 |
|
|
|
131,014 |
|
|
|
235,925 |
|
|
|
252,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
146,793 |
|
|
|
235,152 |
|
|
|
317,758 |
|
|
|
294,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest loss after provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
(27,731 |
) |
|
|
(104,138 |
) |
|
|
(81,833 |
) |
|
|
(41,969 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other service charges on loans |
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
1,523 |
|
|
|
3,242 |
|
|
|
3,052 |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
3,501 |
|
|
|
3,327 |
|
|
|
6,969 |
|
|
|
6,492 |
|
Mortgage banking activities |
|
|
2,140 |
|
|
|
2,373 |
|
|
|
4,640 |
|
|
|
3,179 |
|
Net gain on sale of investments |
|
|
24,240 |
|
|
|
10,305 |
|
|
|
55,604 |
|
|
|
28,143 |
|
Other-than-temporary impairment losses on investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(32,541 |
) |
|
|
(603 |
) |
|
|
(32,929 |
) |
Noncredit-related impairment portion on debt securities
not expected to be sold (recognized in other comprehensive income) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses on investment securities |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(1,061 |
) |
|
|
(603 |
) |
|
|
(1,449 |
) |
Rental income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
856 |
|
Other non-interest income |
|
|
8,161 |
|
|
|
6,541 |
|
|
|
14,999 |
|
|
|
13,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
|
39,525 |
|
|
|
23,415 |
|
|
|
84,851 |
|
|
|
53,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees compensation and benefits |
|
|
30,958 |
|
|
|
34,472 |
|
|
|
62,686 |
|
|
|
68,714 |
|
Occupancy and equipment |
|
|
14,451 |
|
|
|
17,448 |
|
|
|
29,302 |
|
|
|
32,222 |
|
Business promotion |
|
|
3,340 |
|
|
|
3,836 |
|
|
|
5,545 |
|
|
|
6,952 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
5,604 |
|
|
|
3,342 |
|
|
|
10,891 |
|
|
|
6,528 |
|
Taxes, other than income taxes |
|
|
3,817 |
|
|
|
4,017 |
|
|
|
7,638 |
|
|
|
8,018 |
|
Insurance and supervisory fees |
|
|
16,606 |
|
|
|
16,622 |
|
|
|
35,124 |
|
|
|
23,294 |
|
Net loss on real estate owned (REO) operations |
|
|
10,816 |
|
|
|
6,626 |
|
|
|
14,509 |
|
|
|
12,001 |
|
Other non-interest expenses |
|
|
13,019 |
|
|
|
9,625 |
|
|
|
24,278 |
|
|
|
22,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expenses |
|
|
98,611 |
|
|
|
95,988 |
|
|
|
189,973 |
|
|
|
180,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(86,817 |
) |
|
|
(176,711 |
) |
|
|
(186,955 |
) |
|
|
(169,017 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(3,823 |
) |
|
|
98,053 |
|
|
|
(10,684 |
) |
|
|
112,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(90,640 |
) |
|
$ |
(78,658 |
) |
|
$ |
(197,639 |
) |
|
$ |
(56,767 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(96,810 |
) |
|
$ |
(94,825 |
) |
|
$ |
(209,961 |
) |
|
$ |
(88,051 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(1.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.27 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.95 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(1.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.27 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.95 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
6
FIRST BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(197,639 |
) |
|
$ |
(56,767 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
9,863 |
|
|
|
10,460 |
|
Amortization and impairment of core deposit intangible |
|
|
1,297 |
|
|
|
5,856 |
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
317,758 |
|
|
|
294,581 |
|
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
5,047 |
|
|
|
(94,057 |
) |
Stock-based compensation recognized |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
Gain on sale of investments, net |
|
|
(55,604 |
) |
|
|
(28,143 |
) |
Other-than-temporary impairments on investment securities |
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
1,449 |
|
Derivatives instruments and hedging activities gain |
|
|
(1,676 |
) |
|
|
(16,302 |
) |
Net gain on sale of loans and impairments |
|
|
(526 |
) |
|
|
(3,807 |
) |
Net amortization of premiums and discounts and deferred loan fees and costs |
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
Net increase in mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
(8,845 |
) |
|
|
(27,691 |
) |
Amortization of broker placement fees |
|
|
10,787 |
|
|
|
12,146 |
|
Net amortization of premium and discounts on investment securities |
|
|
3,293 |
|
|
|
5,341 |
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued income tax payable |
|
|
909 |
|
|
|
(16,509 |
) |
Decrease in accrued interest receivable |
|
|
12,132 |
|
|
|
19,390 |
|
Decrease in
accrued interest payable |
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
|
(19,193 |
) |
(Increase) Decrease in other assets |
|
|
(298 |
) |
|
|
17,283 |
|
Increase in other liabilities |
|
|
13,727 |
|
|
|
22,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
309,040 |
|
|
|
183,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
111,401 |
|
|
|
127,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal collected on loans |
|
|
2,118,978 |
|
|
|
1,661,329 |
|
Loans originated |
|
|
(1,141,868 |
) |
|
|
(1,984,001 |
) |
Purchases of loans |
|
|
(87,436 |
) |
|
|
(100,697 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans |
|
|
19,187 |
|
|
|
4,866 |
|
Proceeds from sale of repossessed assets |
|
|
47,440 |
|
|
|
31,510 |
|
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
733,887 |
|
|
|
791,313 |
|
Purchases of securities available for sale |
|
|
(1,921,842 |
) |
|
|
(2,627,666 |
) |
Proceeds from principal repayments and maturities of securities held to maturity |
|
|
75,054 |
|
|
|
1,017,001 |
|
Proceeds from principal repayments of securities available for sale |
|
|
1,278,313 |
|
|
|
511,713 |
|
Additions to premises and equipment |
|
|
(19,338 |
) |
|
|
(24,809 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of other investment securities |
|
|
10,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in other equity securities |
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
(19,285 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
1,112,880 |
|
|
|
(738,726 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in deposits |
|
|
46,919 |
|
|
|
(1,015,725 |
) |
Net (decrease) increase in loans payable |
|
|
(900,000 |
) |
|
|
135,000 |
|
Net (decrease) increase in federal funds purchased and securities
sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
(492,193 |
) |
|
|
709,050 |
|
Net FHLB advances (paid) taken |
|
|
(38,000 |
) |
|
|
265,000 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,710 |
) |
Issuance of preferred stock and associated warrant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
Other financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(1,383,274 |
) |
|
|
453,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(158,993 |
) |
|
|
(157,945 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
704,084 |
|
|
|
405,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
545,091 |
|
|
$ |
247,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents include: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
523,047 |
|
|
$ |
177,963 |
|
Money market instruments |
|
|
22,044 |
|
|
|
69,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
545,091 |
|
|
$ |
247,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
7
FIRST BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Preferred Stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
928,508 |
|
|
$ |
550,100 |
|
Issuance of preferred stock Series F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
Preferred stock discount Series F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,820 |
) |
Accretion of preferred stock discount- Series F |
|
|
2,322 |
|
|
|
1,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
930,830 |
|
|
|
926,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock outstanding |
|
|
92,542 |
|
|
|
92,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Paid-In-Capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
134,223 |
|
|
|
108,299 |
|
Issuance of common stock warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,820 |
|
Stock-based compensation recognized |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
134,270 |
|
|
|
134,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal Surplus |
|
|
299,006 |
|
|
|
299,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Accumulated deficit) Retained Earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
118,291 |
|
|
|
440,777 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
(197,639 |
) |
|
|
(56,767 |
) |
Cash dividends declared on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,966 |
) |
Cash dividends declared on preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,751 |
) |
Accretion of preferred stock discount Series F |
|
|
(2,322 |
) |
|
|
(1,979 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
(81,670 |
) |
|
|
342,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
26,493 |
|
|
|
57,389 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
|
36,818 |
|
|
|
(11,007 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
63,311 |
|
|
|
46,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholdersequity |
|
$ |
1,438,289 |
|
|
$ |
1,840,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
8
FIRST BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Six-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(90,640 |
) |
|
$ |
(78,658 |
) |
|
$ |
(197,639 |
) |
|
$ |
(56,767 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities on which an
other-than-temporary impairment has been recognized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncredit-related impairment losses on debt securities not expected to be sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,480 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,480 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for other-than-temporary impairment on debt
securities included in net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
All other unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other
unrealized holding gains arising during the period |
|
|
70,999 |
|
|
|
6,565 |
|
|
|
88,528 |
|
|
|
49,869 |
|
Reclassification adjustments for net gain
included in net income |
|
|
(24,240 |
) |
|
|
(10,305 |
) |
|
|
(44,936 |
) |
|
|
(28,143 |
) |
Reclassification adjustments for other-than-temporary impairment
on equity securities |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense related to items of other comprehensive income |
|
|
(6,399 |
) |
|
|
(2,210 |
) |
|
|
(7,127 |
) |
|
|
(2,702 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) for the period, net of tax |
|
|
40,363 |
|
|
|
(36,369 |
) |
|
|
36,818 |
|
|
|
(11,007 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(50,277 |
) |
|
$ |
(115,027 |
) |
|
$ |
(160,821 |
) |
|
$ |
(67,774 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
9
FIRST BANCORP
PART I
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) have been prepared in conformity with the
accounting policies stated in the Corporations Audited Consolidated Financial Statements included
in the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. Certain
information and note disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP)
have been condensed or omitted from these statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
SEC and, accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Audited
Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009, included
in the Corporations 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K. All adjustments (consisting only of normal
recurring adjustments) that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of
the statement of financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods
have been reflected. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
The results of operations for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2010 are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year.
Recent Developments
Effective June 2, 2010, FirstBank, by and through its Board of Directors, entered into a
Consent Order with the FDIC and the OCIF, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K filed by the
Corporation on June 4, 2010. This Order provides for various things, including (among other things)
the following: (1) within 30 days of entering into the Order, the development by FirstBank of a
capital plan to achieve over time a leverage ratio of at least 8%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital
ratio of at least 10% and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 12%, (2) the preparation by
FirstBank of strategic, liquidity and earnings plans and related projections within certain
timetables set forth in the Order and on an ongoing basis, (3) the preparation by FirstBank of
plans for reducing criticized assets and delinquent loans within timeframes set forth in the Order,
(4) the requirement for First Bank board approval prior to the extension of credit to classified
borrowers, (5) certain limitations with respect to brokered deposits, including the need for
pre-approval by the FDIC of the issuance of brokered deposits, (6) the establishment by FirstBank of
a comprehensive policy and methodology for determining the allowance for loan and lease losses and
the review and revision of loan policies, including the non-accrual policy, and (7) the operation
by FirstBank under adequate and effective programs of independent loan review and appraisal
compliance and under an effective policy for managing sensitivity to interest rate risk. The
foregoing summary is not complete and is qualified in all respects by reference to the actual
language of the Order. Although all the regulatory capital ratios exceeded the established well
capitalized levels at June 30, 2010, because of the Order with the FDIC, FirstBank cannot be
treated as a well capitalized institution under regulatory guidance.
Effective
June 3, 2010, First BanCorp entered into the Agreement with the FED, a
copy of which is attached as Exhibit 10.2 of the Form 8-K filed by the Corporation on June 4, 2010.
The Agreement provides, among other things, that the holding company must serve as a source of
strength to FirstBank, and that, except upon consent of the FED, the holding company may not pay
dividends to stockholders or receive dividends from FirstBank, the holding company and its nonbank
subsidiaries may not make payments on trust preferred securities or subordinated debt, and the
holding company cannot incur, increase or guarantee debt or repurchase any capital securities. The
Agreement also requires that the holding company submit a capital
plan that reflects sufficient
capital, which must be acceptable to the FED, and follow certain guidelines with respect to
the appointment or change in responsibilities of senior officers. The foregoing summary is not
complete and is qualified in all respects by reference to the actual language of the Agreement.
The Order imposes no other restrictions on FirstBanks products or services offered to
customers, nor does it impose any type of penalties or fines upon FirstBank or the Corporation.
The FDIC has granted FirstBank temporary waivers to enable it to
continue accessing the brokered deposit market through September 30, 2010. FirstBank will request
approvals for future periods.
On July 7, 2010, the Corporation entered into an Exchange Agreement (the Exchange Agreement)
with the U.S. Treasury pursuant to which the U.S. Treasury agreed, subject to the satisfaction or
waiver of certain closing conditions, to exchange all 400,000 shares of the Corporations Fixed
Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series F, with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per
share (the Series F Preferred Stock), beneficially owned and held by the Treasury, for 400,000
shares of a new series of preferred stock, Fixed Rate Cumulative Mandatorily Convertible Preferred
Stock, Series G (the Series G Preferred Stock), with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per
share, plus additional shares of Series G Preferred Stock having a value equal to the accrued and
unpaid dividends on the Series F Preferred Stock. The Corporation subsequently completed the
transaction with the U.S. Treasury by issuing 424,174 shares of Series G Preferred Stock to the
U.S. Treasury in exchange for the Series F Preferred Stock it previously held and
10
accrued
dividends. The Series G Preferred Stock is convertible into approximately 380.2 million shares of
the Corporations common stock by the Corporation upon the satisfaction of certain conditions and
by the U.S. Treasury and successor holders anytime and will be mandatorily converted on the seventh year
anniversary at the then market price if it is still outstanding.
Capital and Liquidity
The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which
contemplates the realization of assets and the discharge of liabilities in the normal course of
business for the foreseeable future. Sustained weak economic conditions that have severely affected
Puerto Rico and the United States over the last several years have adversely impacted First
BanCorps results of operations and capital levels. The net loss in 2009, primarily related to
credit losses, the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets and an increase in the deposit
insurance premium, reduced the Corporations capital levels during 2009. The net loss for the
six-month period ended June 30, 2010 was primarily driven by credit losses. While regulatory
capital ratios were not significantly impacted during the first half of 2010, the tangible common
equity ratio, which is an important measure to investors and credit rating agencies, continued to
decrease impacted by the net loss for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010. The tangible
common equity ratio decreased from 3.20% as of December 31, 2009 to 2.57% as of June 30, 2010. The
decrease in regulatory capital ratios during the six-month period ended June 30, 2010 was not
significant since the net loss reported for the period was almost entirely offset by a decrease in
risk-weighted assets, consistent with the Corporations decision to deleverage its balance sheet to
preserve its capital position. As of June 30, 2010, the Corporations Total and Tier 1 capital
ratios were 13.35% and 12.05%, respectively, compared to 13.44% and 12.16% as of December 31, 2009.
Although all the regulatory capital ratios exceeded the established well capitalized levels at
June 30, 2010, due to the Order discussed above, FirstBank cannot be treated as a well
capitalized institution under regulatory guidance.
The Corporation submitted capital plans to the FED and the FDIC setting forth how the
Corporation and FirstBank plan to improve their capital positions to comply with the above
mentioned Agreements over time. Specifically, FirstBanks Capital Plan details how it will
achieve over time a leverage ratio of at least 8%, a Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio
of at least 10% and a Total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of at least 12%.
The Corporation already announced that it has commenced an offer to exchange (the Exchange
Offer) up to 256,401,610 newly issued shares of its common stock for any and all of the issued and
outstanding shares of Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series A through E
(the Preferred Stock). In addition to this exchange offer, the Corporation has been taking steps
to implement strategies to increase tangible common equity and regulatory capital through (i) the
issuance of approximately $500 million of equity in one or more public or private offerings (a
Capital Raise), (ii) the conversion into common stock of the shares of Series G Preferred Stock
that the Corporation issued to the U.S. Treasury on July 20, 2010 in exchange for the Series F
Preferred Stock that the Corporation sold to it on January 16, 2009, and (iii) a rights offering to
common stockholders. The Corporation may compel the conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock into
common stock only if, among other things, by April 7, 2011, it issues common stock in the Exchange
Offer for at least $385 million liquidation preference amount of the Preferred Stock and issues at
least $500 million of equity in a Capital Raise. Also, the Corporation has continued to deleverage
its balance sheet by reducing amounts of brokered certificates of deposit (CDs) and borrowings.
Such reductions were partially offset by increases in retail and business deposits when comparing
ending balances as of June 30, 2010 to balances as of December 31, 2009. Significant decreases in
risk-weighted assets have been achieved mainly through the non-renewal of commercial loans with
100% risk weightings, such as temporary loan facilities to the Puerto Rico government and others,
and through the charge-offs of portions of loans deemed uncollectible. Also, a reduced volume of
loan originations contributed to partially offset the effect of net losses on capital ratios.
Inability to complete the above mentioned Exchange Offer could hinder efforts to sell Common
Stock in a Capital Raise. If holders of $385 million or approximately 70% of the liquidation
preference of the Preferred Stock tender their shares of Preferred Stock in the Exchange Offer, the
Corporation raises $500 million of additional capital, and the holders of the Corporations Common
Stock approve amendments to the Articles of Incorporation, by
April 7, 2011, the Corporation will meet the substantive conditions
necessary to compel the U.S. Treasury to convert into Common Stock the shares of recently issued
Series G Preferred Stock. Completing the Capital Plan initiatives would result in dilution to the
Corporations current stockholders. If the Corporation needs to continue to recognize significant
reserves and cannot complete a Capital Raise, the Corporation and FirstBank may not be able to
comply with the minimum capital requirements included in the capital plans required by the
Agreements. In that case, the Corporation would implement other
capital preservation strategies, including among others, an accelerated deleverage
strategy and the divesture of profitable businesses, which could allow us to meet the minimum
capital requirements included in the capital plans required by the Agreements. The Corporation
anticipates that it will need to continue to dedicate significant resources and efforts to comply with these
Agreements, which may increase operational costs or adversely affect the amount of time management
has to conduct operations.
Both the Corporation and the Bank actively manage liquidity and cash flow needs. The
Corporation does not have any unsecured debt maturing during the remaining of 2010; additionally,
it suspended common and preferred dividends to stockholders effective August 2009. As of June 30,
2010, the holding company had $52.6 million of cash and cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents
at the Bank as of June 30, 2010 were approximately $544.8 million. The Bank has $484.4 million in
repurchase
11
agreements maturing over the next year, of which $184.4 million mature in the next 30
days, and $7.2 million in notes that mature prior to June 30, 2011. In addition, it had $7.1
billion in brokered deposits as of June 30, 2010 of which $3.5 billion mature over the next year.
Liquidity at the bank level is highly dependent on bank deposits which fund 70.64% of the Banks
assets (or 31.39% excluding brokered CDs). As of June 30, 2010, the Bank held approximately $1.1
billion of readily pledgeable or saleable investment securities.
The Corporations credit as a long-term issuer is currently rated CCC+ by Standard & Poors
(S&P) and B- by Fitch Ratings Limited (Fitch); both with negative outlook. At the FirstBank
subsidiary level, long-term issuer rating is currently B3 by Moodys Investor Service (Moodys),
six notches below their definition of investment grade; CCC+ by S&P seven notches below their
definition of investment grade, and B- by Fitch, six notches below their definition of investment
grade. The outlook on the Banks credit ratings from the three rating agencies is negative. During
the second quarter of 2010, the Corporation and its subsidiary bank suffered credit rating
downgrades from Moodys (B1 to B3), S&P (B to CCC+), and Fitch (B to B-) rating services.
Furthermore, on June 2010, Moodys and Fitch placed the Corporation on Credit Watch Negative and
S&P placed a Negative Outlook. The Corporation does not have any outstanding debt or derivative
agreements that would be affected by the recent credit downgrades. Furthermore, given our
non-reliance on corporate debt or other instruments directly linked in terms of pricing or volume
to credit ratings, the liquidity of the Corporation so far has also not been affected in any
material way by the downgrades. The Corporations ability to access new non-deposit funding,
however, could be adversely affected by these credit ratings and any additional downgrades.
Based on current and expected liquidity needs and sources, management expects First BanCorp to
be able to meet its obligations for a reasonable period of time. The Corporation has $3.5 billion
of brokered CDs maturing within twelve months from June 30,
2010. Management anticipates it will
continue to obtain waivers from the restrictions to issue brokered CDs under the Order to meet its
obligations and execute its business plans. If unanticipated market factors emerge, or if the
Corporation is unable to raise additional capital or complete the identified aforementioned capital
preservation initiatives, successfully execute its plans, issue a sufficient amount of brokered
deposits or comply with the Order, its banking regulators could take further action, which could
include actions that may have a material adverse effect on the Corporations business, results of
operations and financial position.
Adoption of new accounting requirements and recently issued but not yet effective accounting
requirements
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has issued the following accounting
pronouncements and guidance relevant to the Corporations operations:
In June 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance on the accounting for transfers of
financial assets, to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the
information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of
financial assets, the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and
cash flows, and a transferors continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets.
This guidance is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first annual reporting
period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting
period and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Subsequently in December 2009, the
FASB amended the existing guidance issued in June 2009. Among the most significant changes and
additions to this guidance are changes to the conditions for sales of a financial asset based on
whether a transferor and its consolidated affiliates included in the financial statements have
surrendered control over the transferred financial asset or third party beneficial interest; and
the addition of the term participating interest, which represents a proportionate (pro rata)
ownership interest in an entire financial asset. The Corporation adopted the guidance with no
material impact on its financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance on the consolidation of variable
interests to improve financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities
and address (i) the effects of the elimination of the qualifying special-purpose entity concept in
the accounting for transfer of financial assets guidance, and (ii) constituent concerns about the
application of certain key provisions of the guidance, including those in which the accounting and
disclosures do not always provide timely and useful information about an enterprises involvement
in a variable interest entity. This guidance is effective as of the beginning of each reporting
entitys first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods
within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter.
Subsequently in December 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance issued in June 2009. Among
the most significant changes and additions to the guidance is the replacement of the quantitative
based risks and rewards calculation for determining which reporting entity, if any, has a
controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused on
identifying which reporting entity has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest
entity that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance and the obligation to
absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity. The Corporation
adopted the guidance with no material impact on its financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB updated the Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) to
provide guidance to improve disclosure requirements related to fair value measurements and require
reporting entities to make new disclosures about recurring or nonrecurring fair-value measurements
including significant transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair-value measurements and
information on purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis in the reconciliation
of Level 3 fair-value measurements.
12
Currently, entities are only required to disclose activity in
Level 3 measurements in the fair-value hierarchy on a net basis. The FASB also clarified existing
fair-value measurement disclosure guidance about the level of disaggregation, inputs, and valuation
techniques. Entities are required to separately disclose significant transfers into and out of
Level 1 and Level 2 measurements in the fair-value hierarchy and the reasons for the transfers.
Significance will be determined based on earnings and total assets or total liabilities or, when
changes in fair value are recognized in other comprehensive income, based on total equity. A
reporting entity must disclose and consistently follow its policy for determining when transfers
between levels are recognized. Acceptable methods for determining when to recognize transfers
include: (i) actual date of the event or change in circumstances causing the transfer; (ii)
beginning of the reporting period; and (iii) end of the reporting period. The guidance requires
disclosure of fair-value measurements by class instead of major category. A class is generally
a subset of assets and liabilities within a financial statement line item and is based on the
specific nature and risks of the assets and liabilities and their classification in the fair-value
hierarchy. When determining classes, reporting entities must also consider the level of
disaggregated information required by other applicable GAAP. For fair-value measurements using
significant observable inputs (Level 2) or significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), this guidance
requires reporting entities to disclose the valuation technique and the inputs used in determining
fair value for each class of assets and liabilities. If the valuation technique has changed in the
reporting period (e.g., from a market approach to an income approach) or if an additional valuation
technique is used, entities are required to disclose the change and the reason for making the
change. Except for the detailed Level 3 roll forward disclosures, the guidance is effective for
annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 (first quarter of 2010 for
public companies with calendar year-ends). The new disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances,
and settlements in the roll forward activity for Level 3 fair value measurements are effective for
interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010 (first quarter of 2011 for
public companies with calendar year-ends). Early adoption is permitted. In the initial adoption
period, entities are not required to include disclosures for previous comparative periods; however,
they are required for periods ending after initial adoption. The Corporation adopted the guidance
in the first quarter of 2010 and the required disclosures are presented in Note 19 Fair Value.
In February 2010, the FASB updated the Codification to provide guidance to improve disclosure
requirements related to the recognition and disclosure of subsequent events. The amendment
establishes that an entity that either (a) is an SEC filer or (b) is a conduit bond obligor for
conduit debt securities that are traded in a public market (a domestic or foreign stock exchange or
an over-the-counter market, including local or regional markets) is required to evaluate subsequent
events through the date that the financial statements are issued. If an entity meets neither of
those criteria, then it should evaluate subsequent events through the date the financial statements
are available to be issued. An entity that is an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date
through which subsequent events have been evaluated. Also, the scope of the reissuance disclosure
requirements has been refined to include revised financial statements only. Revised financial
statements include financial statements revised either as a result of the correction of an error or
retrospective application of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The guidance in this
update was effective on the date of issuance in February. The Corporation has adopted this
guidance; refer to Note 24 Subsequent events.
In February 2010, the FASB updated the Codification to provide guidance on the deferral of
consolidation requirements for a reporting entitys interest in an entity (1) that has all the
attributes of an investment company or (2) for which it is industry practice to apply measurement
principles for financial reporting purposes that are consistent with those followed by investment
companies. The deferral does not apply in situations in which a reporting entity has the explicit
or implicit obligation to fund losses of an entity that could potentially be significant to the
entity. The deferral also does not apply to interests in securitization entities, asset-backed
financing entities, or entities formerly considered qualifying special purpose entities. In
addition, the deferral applies to a reporting entitys interest in an entity that is required to
comply or operate in accordance with requirements similar to those in Rule 2a-7 of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 for registered money market funds. An entity that qualifies for the deferral
will continue to be assessed under the overall guidance on the consolidation of variable interest
entities. The guidance also clarifies that for entities that do not qualify for the deferral,
related parties should be considered for determining whether a decision maker or service provider
fee represents a variable interest. In addition, the requirements for evaluating whether a decision
makers or service providers fee is a variable interest are modified to clarify the FASBs
intention that a quantitative calculation should not be the sole basis for this evaluation. The
guidance was effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009.
The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact in the Corporations consolidated financial
statements.
In March 2010, the FASB updated the Codification to provide clarification on the scope
exception related to embedded credit derivatives related to the transfer of credit risk in the form
of subordination of one financial instrument to another. The transfer of credit risk that is only
in the form of subordination of one financial instrument to another (thereby redistributing credit
risk) is an embedded derivative feature that should not be subject to potential bifurcation and
separate accounting. The amendments address how to determine which embedded credit derivative
features, including those in collateralized debt obligations and synthetic collateralized debt
obligations, are considered to be embedded derivatives that should not be analyzed under this
guidance. The Corporation may elect the fair value option for any investment in a beneficial
interest in a securitized financial asset. The guidance is effective for the first fiscal quarter
beginning after June 15, 2010. The Corporation is currently evaluating the impact, if any, of the
adoption of this guidance on its financial statements.
In April 2010, the FASB updated the codification to provide guidance on the effects of a loan
modification when a loan is part of a pool that is accounted for as a single asset. Modifications
of loans that are accounted for within a pool do not result in the removal of those loans from the
pool even if the modification of those loans would otherwise be considered a troubled debt
13
restructuring. An entity will continue to be required to consider whether the pool of assets in
which the loan is included is impaired if expected cash flows for the pool change. The amendments
in this Update are effective for modifications of loans accounted for within pools occurring in the
first interim or annual period ending on or after July 15, 2010. The amendments are to be applied
prospectively and early application is permitted. The Corporation is currently evaluating the
impact, if any, of the adoption of this guidance on its financial statements.
In July 2010, the FASB updated the codification to expand the disclosure requirements
regarding credit quality of financing receivables and the allowance for credit losses. The
objectives of the enhanced disclosures are to provide information that will enable readers of
financial statements to understand the nature of credit risk in a companys financing receivables,
how that risk is analyzed in determining the related allowance for credit losses and changes to the
allowance during the reporting period. An entity should provide disclosures on a disaggregated
basis defined as a portfolio segment and class of financing receivable. The amendments in this
Update are effective for both interim and annual reporting period ending after December 15, 2010.
The Corporation is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this guidance on its
financial statements.
2 EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
The calculations of earnings per common share for the quarters and six-month periods ended on
June 30, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Six-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share information) |
|
Net Loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(90,640 |
) |
|
$ |
(78,658 |
) |
|
$ |
(197,639 |
) |
|
$ |
(56,767 |
) |
Less: Preferred stock dividends (1) |
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
|
(15,069 |
) |
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
(29,305 |
) |
Less: Preferred stock discount accretion |
|
|
(1,170 |
) |
|
|
(1,097 |
) |
|
|
(2,322 |
) |
|
|
(1,979 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(96,810 |
) |
|
$ |
(94,824 |
) |
|
$ |
(209,961 |
) |
|
$ |
(88,051 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
92,521 |
|
|
|
92,511 |
|
|
|
92,521 |
|
|
|
92,511 |
|
Average potential common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
92,521 |
|
|
|
92,511 |
|
|
|
92,521 |
|
|
|
92,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(1.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.27 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.95 |
) |
Diluted |
|
$ |
(1.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.27 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.95 |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Preferred stock dividends for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2010 relate to
Series F preferred stock cumulative preferred dividends not declared corresponding to such periods
while for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2009 cumulative dividends not declared on
Series F preferred stock and included as preferred stock dividends for purposes of earnings per
share calculation, amounted to $2.6 million. Refer to Note 17 and Note 24 for additional
information related to the Series F preferred stock issued to the U.S. Treasury in connection with
the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) Capital Purchase Program. |
(Loss) earnings per common share is computed by dividing net (loss) income attributable to
common stockholders by the weighted average common shares issued and outstanding. Net (loss) income
attributable to common stockholders represents net (loss) income adjusted for preferred stock
dividends including dividends declared, accretion of discount on preferred stock issuances and
cumulative dividends related to the current dividend period that have not been declared as of the
end of the period. Basic weighted average common shares outstanding exclude unvested shares of
restricted stock.
Potential common shares consist of common stock issuable under the assumed exercise of stock
options, unvested shares of restricted stock, and outstanding warrants using the treasury stock
method. This method assumes that the potential common shares are issued and the proceeds from the
exercise, in addition to the amount of compensation cost attributable to future services, are used
to purchase common stock at the exercise date. The difference between the number of potential
shares issued and the shares purchased is added as incremental shares to the actual number of
shares outstanding to compute diluted earnings per share. Stock
options, unvested shares of restricted stock, and outstanding warrants that result in lower
potential shares issued than shares purchased under the treasury stock method are not included in
the computation of dilutive earnings per share since their inclusion would have an antidilutive
effect on earnings per share. For the quarter and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
there were 2,073,200 and 3,910,910, respectively, outstanding stock options, as well as warrants
outstanding to purchase 5,842,259 shares of common stock related to the TARP Capital Purchase
Program that were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per common share because the
Corporation reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders for the periods and their
inclusion would have an antidilutive effect. Approximately 21,477 and 36,243 unvested shares of
restricted stock outstanding as of June 30, 2010 and 2009 were excluded from the computation of
earnings per share.
14
3 STOCK OPTION PLAN
Between 1997 and January 2007, the Corporation had a stock option plan (the 1997 stock option
plan) that authorized the granting of up to 8,696,112 options on shares of the Corporations
common stock to eligible employees. The options granted under the plan could not exceed 20% of the
number of common shares outstanding. Each option provides for the purchase of one share of common
stock at a price not less than the fair market value of the stock on the date the option was
granted. Stock options were fully vested upon grant. The maximum term to exercise the options is
ten years. The stock option plan provides for a proportionate adjustment in the exercise price and
the number of shares that can be purchased in the event of a stock dividend, stock split,
reclassification of stock, merger or reorganization and certain other issuances and distributions
such as stock appreciation rights.
Under the 1997 stock option plan, the Compensation and Benefits Committee (the Compensation
Committee) had the authority to grant stock appreciation rights at any time subsequent to the
grant of an option. Pursuant to stock appreciation rights, the optionee surrenders the right to
exercise an option granted under the plan in consideration for payment by the Corporation of an
amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares of common stock subject to such
option surrendered over the total option price of such shares. Any option surrendered is cancelled
by the Corporation and the shares subject to the option are not eligible for further grants under
the option plan. On January 21, 2007, the 1997 stock option plan expired; all outstanding awards
granted under this plan continue in full force and effect, subject to their original terms. No
awards for shares could be granted under the 1997 stock option plan as of its expiration.
On April 29, 2008, the Corporations stockholders approved the First BanCorp 2008 Omnibus
Incentive Plan (the Omnibus Plan). The Omnibus Plan provides for equity-based compensation
incentives (the awards) through the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted
stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, and other stock-based awards. This plan allows
the issuance of up to 3,800,000 shares of common stock, subject to adjustments for stock splits,
reorganization and other similar events. The Corporations Board of Directors, upon receiving the
relevant recommendation of the Compensation Committee, has the power and authority to determine
those eligible to receive awards and to establish the terms and conditions of any awards subject to
various limits and vesting restrictions that apply to individual and aggregate awards. Shares
delivered pursuant to an award may consist, in whole or in part, of authorized and unissued shares
of Common Stock or shares of Common Stock acquired by the Corporation. During the fourth quarter of
2008, the Corporation granted 36,243 shares of restricted stock with a fair value of $8.69 under
the Omnibus Plan to the Corporations independent directors, of which 4,027 were forfeited in the
second half of 2009 and 10,739 have vested.
For the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2010, the Corporation recognized $23,333
and $46,666, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense related to the aforementioned
restricted stock awards. The total unrecognized compensation cost related to the non-vested
restricted shares was $167,223 as of June 30, 2010 and is expected to be recognized over the next
1.4 years.
There were no stock options granted during 2010 and 2009, therefore, no compensation
associated with stock options was recorded in those years.
Stock-based compensation accounting guidance requires the Corporation to develop an estimate
of the number of share-based awards which will be forfeited due to employee or director turnover.
Quarterly changes in the estimated forfeiture rate may have a significant effect on share-based
compensation, as the effect of adjusting the rate for all expense amortization is recognized in the
period in which the forfeiture estimate is changed. If the actual forfeiture rate is higher than
the estimated forfeiture rate, then an adjustment is made to increase the estimated forfeiture
rate, which will result in a decrease to the expense recognized in the financial statements. If the
actual forfeiture rate is lower than the estimated forfeiture rate, then an adjustment is made to
decrease the estimated forfeiture rate, which will result in an increase to the expense recognized
in the financial statements. When unvested options or shares of restricted stock are forfeited, any
compensation expense previously recognized on the forfeited awards is reversed in the period of the
forfeiture.
The activity of stock options for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six month period ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Contractual Term |
|
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
(Years) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Beginning of period |
|
|
2,481,310 |
|
|
$ |
13.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options cancelled |
|
|
(408,110 |
) |
|
|
14.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period outstanding and exercisable |
|
|
2,073,200 |
|
|
$ |
13.24 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
No stock options were exercised during the first half of 2010 or 2009.
4 INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Investment Securities Available for Sale
The amortized cost, non-credit loss component of other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) on
securities recorded in other comprehensive income (OCI), gross unrealized gains and losses
recorded in OCI, approximate fair value, weighted-average yield and contractual maturities of
investment securities available for sale as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Component |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Component |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
of OTTI |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
average |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
of OTTI |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
average |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
Recorded in OCI |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
|
yield% |
|
|
cost |
|
|
Recorded in OCI |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
|
yield% |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
U.S. Treasury securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
$ |
599,929 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,444 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
608,373 |
|
|
|
1.34 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Government
sponsored agencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
685,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
690,494 |
|
|
|
1.73 |
|
|
|
1,139,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,145,139 |
|
|
|
2.12 |
|
Puerto Rico Government
obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year |
|
|
12,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
12,002 |
|
|
|
1.78 |
|
|
|
12,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
11,989 |
|
|
|
1.82 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
113,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,713 |
|
|
|
5.40 |
|
|
|
113,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
113,487 |
|
|
|
5.40 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
7,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,459 |
|
|
|
5.88 |
|
|
|
6,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
7,230 |
|
|
|
5.88 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
5,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,263 |
|
|
|
6.24 |
|
|
|
3,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,620 |
|
|
|
5.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States and
Puerto Rico Government
obligations |
|
|
1,423,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,871 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
1,437,304 |
|
|
|
1.90 |
|
|
|
1,275,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,284 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
1,281,465 |
|
|
|
2.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
5.54 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
322,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
333,417 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
|
|
|
705,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,388 |
|
|
|
1,987 |
|
|
|
722,219 |
|
|
|
4.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
333,420 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
|
|
|
705,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,388 |
|
|
|
1,987 |
|
|
|
722,249 |
|
|
|
4.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GNMA certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
6.55 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
6.56 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
1,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
4.81 |
|
|
|
808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
847 |
|
|
|
5.47 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
886,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
920,688 |
|
|
|
4.51 |
|
|
|
407,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,808 |
|
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
417,393 |
|
|
|
5.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
887,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
922,341 |
|
|
|
4.51 |
|
|
|
408,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,850 |
|
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
418,312 |
|
|
|
5.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
88,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,585 |
|
|
|
4.51 |
|
|
|
101,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,716 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
105,406 |
|
|
|
4.55 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
921,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
960,178 |
|
|
|
4.14 |
|
|
|
1,374,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,629 |
|
|
|
2,776 |
|
|
|
1,402,386 |
|
|
|
4.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,010,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,053,763 |
|
|
|
4.16 |
|
|
|
1,476,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,345 |
|
|
|
2,867 |
|
|
|
1,507,792 |
|
|
|
4.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
issued or guaranteed by
FHLMC,
FNMA and GNMA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years |
|
|
125,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,120 |
|
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
|
156,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
156,307 |
|
|
|
0.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other mortgage pass-through
trust certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years |
|
|
109,732 |
|
|
|
28,875 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,858 |
|
|
|
2.51 |
|
|
|
117,198 |
|
|
|
32,846 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,354 |
|
|
|
2.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
2,456,304 |
|
|
|
28,875 |
|
|
|
90,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,517,502 |
|
|
|
4.03 |
|
|
|
2,863,888 |
|
|
|
32,846 |
|
|
|
64,218 |
|
|
|
6,246 |
|
|
|
2,889,014 |
|
|
|
4.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities (without
contractual maturity) (1) |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
available for sale |
|
$ |
3,879,844 |
|
|
$ |
28,875 |
|
|
$ |
103,971 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
3,954,910 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
$ |
4,139,661 |
|
|
$ |
32,846 |
|
|
$ |
70,583 |
|
|
$ |
6,616 |
|
|
$ |
4,170,782 |
|
|
|
3.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents common shares of other financial institutions in Puerto Rico. |
Maturities of mortgage-backed securities are based on contractual terms assuming no
prepayments. Expected maturities of investments might differ from contractual maturities because
they may be subject to prepayments and/or call options as was the case with approximately $951
million of investment securities (mainly U.S. agency debt securities) called during 2010. The
weighted-average yield on investment securities available for sale is based on amortized cost and,
therefore, does not give effect to changes in fair value. The net unrealized gain or loss on
securities available for sale and the non-credit loss component of OTTI are presented as part of
OCI.
16
The following tables show the Corporations available-for-sale investments fair value and
gross unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual
securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, as of June 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009. It also includes debt securities for which an OTTI was recognized and only the amount related
to a credit loss was recognized in earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Government
obligations |
|
$ |
11,952 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,952 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GNMA |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other mortgage pass-through trust
certificates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,628 |
|
|
|
28,875 |
|
|
|
80,628 |
|
|
|
28,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,004 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
80,628 |
|
|
$ |
28,875 |
|
|
$ |
92,632 |
|
|
$ |
28,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Government
obligations |
|
$ |
14,760 |
|
|
$ |
118 |
|
|
$ |
9,113 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
$ |
23,873 |
|
|
$ |
165 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC |
|
|
236,925 |
|
|
|
1,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236,925 |
|
|
|
1,987 |
|
GNMA |
|
|
72,178 |
|
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,178 |
|
|
|
980 |
|
FNMA |
|
|
415,601 |
|
|
|
2,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415,601 |
|
|
|
2,867 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations issued
or guaranteed by FHLMC, FNMA
and GNMA |
|
|
105,075 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,075 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
Other mortgage pass-through trust
certificates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,105 |
|
|
|
32,846 |
|
|
|
84,105 |
|
|
|
32,846 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
844,629 |
|
|
$ |
6,569 |
|
|
$ |
93,218 |
|
|
$ |
32,893 |
|
|
$ |
937,847 |
|
|
$ |
39,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
Investments Held to Maturity
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, approximate fair value,
weighted-average yield and contractual maturities of investment securities held to maturity as of
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
average |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
average |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
|
yield% |
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
|
yield% |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
U.S. Treasury securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within 1 year |
|
$ |
16,975 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
16,973 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
8,480 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,492 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
Puerto Rico Government
obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
18,929 |
|
|
|
829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,758 |
|
|
|
5.86 |
|
|
|
18,584 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
19,055 |
|
|
|
5.86 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
4,730 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,810 |
|
|
|
5.50 |
|
|
|
4,995 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,072 |
|
|
|
5.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States and Puerto
Rico Government obligations |
|
|
40,634 |
|
|
|
909 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
41,541 |
|
|
|
3.53 |
|
|
|
32,059 |
|
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
32,619 |
|
|
|
4.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
3,691 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,743 |
|
|
|
3.78 |
|
|
|
5,015 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,093 |
|
|
|
3.79 |
|
FNMA certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
3,539 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,606 |
|
|
|
3.88 |
|
|
|
4,771 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,871 |
|
|
|
3.87 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
459,919 |
|
|
|
27,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487,592 |
|
|
|
4.48 |
|
|
|
533,593 |
|
|
|
19,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
553,141 |
|
|
|
4.47 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
23,519 |
|
|
|
1,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,553 |
|
|
|
5.31 |
|
|
|
24,181 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,660 |
|
|
|
5.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
490,668 |
|
|
|
28,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
519,494 |
|
|
|
4.51 |
|
|
|
567,560 |
|
|
|
20,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
587,765 |
|
|
|
4.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
5.80 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
5.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
held-to-maturity |
|
$ |
533,302 |
|
|
$ |
29,735 |
|
|
$ |
703 |
|
|
$ |
562,334 |
|
|
|
4.44 |
|
|
$ |
601,619 |
|
|
$ |
20,858 |
|
|
$ |
893 |
|
|
$ |
621,584 |
|
|
|
4.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities of mortgage-backed securities are based on contractual terms assuming no
prepayments. Expected maturities of investments might differ from contractual maturities because
they may be subject to prepayments and/or call options.
The following tables show the Corporations held-to-maturity investments fair value and gross
unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities
have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Treasury Notes |
|
$ |
8,473 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,473 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,473 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
1,299 |
|
|
$ |
701 |
|
|
$ |
9,772 |
|
|
$ |
703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Government obligations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,678 |
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
4,678 |
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,878 |
|
|
$ |
893 |
|
|
$ |
5,878 |
|
|
$ |
893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
Assessment for OTTI
On a quarterly basis, the Corporation performs an assessment to determine whether there have
been any events or economic circumstances indicating that a security with an unrealized loss has
suffered OTTI. A debt security is considered impaired if the fair value is less than its amortized
cost basis at the reporting date. The accounting literature requires the Corporation to assess
whether the unrealized loss is other-than-temporary.
Prior to April 1, 2009, unrealized losses that were determined to be temporary were recorded,
net of tax, in other comprehensive income for available-for-sale securities, whereas unrealized
losses related to held-to-maturity securities determined to be temporary were not recognized.
Regardless of whether the security was classified as available for sale or held to maturity,
unrealized losses that were determined to be other-than-temporary were recorded through earnings.
An unrealized loss was considered other-than-temporary if (i) it was probable that the holder would
not collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the debt security, or (ii) the
fair value was below the amortized cost of the debt security for a prolonged period of time and the
Corporation did not have the positive intent and ability to hold the security until recovery or
maturity.
In April 2009, the FASB amended the OTTI model for debt securities. Under the amended
guidance, OTTI losses must be recognized in earnings if an investor has the intent to sell the debt
security or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security before
recovery of its amortized cost basis. However, even if an investor does not expect to sell a debt
security, it must evaluate expected cash flows to be received and determine if a credit loss has
occurred.
Under the amended guidance, an unrealized loss is generally deemed to be other-than-temporary
and a credit loss is deemed to exist if the present value of the expected future cash flows is less
than the amortized cost basis of the debt security. As a result of the Corporations adoption of
this new guidance, the credit loss component of an OTTI, if any, would be recorded as a separate
line item in the accompanying consolidated statements of (loss) income, while the remaining portion
of the impairment loss would be recognized in OCI, provided the Corporation does not intend to sell
the underlying debt security and it is more likely than not that the Corporation will not have to
sell the debt security prior to recovery. For the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2010,
there were no credit loss impairment charges in earnings.
Debt securities issued by U.S. government agencies, government-sponsored entities and the U.S.
Treasury accounted for more than 94% of the total available-for-sale and held-to-maturity portfolio
as of June 30, 2010 and no credit losses are expected, given the explicit and implicit guarantees
provided by the U.S. federal government. The Corporations assessment was concentrated mainly on
private label MBS of approximately $110 million for which the Corporation evaluates credit losses
on a quarterly basis. The Corporation considered the following factors in determining whether a
credit loss exists and the period over which the debt security is expected to recover:
The length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than the amortized
cost basis.
Changes in the near term prospects of the underlying collateral of a security such as changes
in default rates, loss severity given default and significant changes in prepayment
assumptions;
The level of cash flows generated from the underlying collateral supporting the principal and
interest payments of the debt securities; and
Any adverse change to the credit conditions and liquidity of the issuer, taking into
consideration the latest information available about the overall financial condition of the
issuer, credit ratings, recent legislation and government actions affecting the issuers
industry and actions taken by the issuer to deal with the present economic climate.
No OTTI losses on available-for-sale debt securities were recorded in the first half of 2010.
Cumulative unrealized other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in OCI as of June 30, 2010
amounted to $31.7 million.
19
For the second quarter and first half of 2009, the Corporation recorded OTTI losses on
available-for-sale debt securities as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Private label MBS |
|
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses |
|
$ |
(32,541 |
) |
Unrealized other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in OCI (1) |
|
|
31,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings (2) |
|
$ |
(1,061 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the noncredit component impact of the OTTI on available-for-sale
debt securities |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the credit component of the OTTI on available-for-sale debt
securities |
The following table summarizes the rollforward of credit losses on debt securities held by the
Corporation for which a portion of OTTI is recognized in OCI:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter and |
|
|
|
Six-Month Period Ended |
|
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
Credit losses at the beginning of the period |
|
$ |
|
|
Additions: |
|
|
|
|
Credit losses related to securities for which an OTTI
was not previously recognized |
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance of credit losses on debt securities held for which a
portion of an OTTI was recognized in OCI |
|
$ |
1,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
Private
label MBS are collateralized by fixed-rate mortgages on single family
residential properties in the United States and the interest rate is
variable, tied to 3-month LIBOR and limited to the weighted-average
coupon of the underlying collateral. The underlying mortgages are
fixed-rate single family loans with original high FICO scores (over
700) and moderate original loan-to-value ratios (under 80%), as well
as moderate delinquency levels.
Based on the expected cash flows derived from the model, and since the Corporation does not
have the intention to sell the securities and has sufficient capital and liquidity to hold these
securities until a recovery of the fair value occurs, no credit losses were reflected in earnings
for the period ended June 30, 2010. As a result of the valuation performed as of June 30, 2010, no
additional other-than-temporary impairment was recorded for the period. Significant assumptions in
the valuation of the private label MBS as of June 30, 2010 were as follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Range |
Discount rate |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
Prepayment rate |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
20.37% - 44.41 |
% |
Projected Cumulative Loss Rate |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
0.90% - 16.36 |
% |
For each of the quarter and six-month period ended on June 30, 2010, the Corporation recorded
OTTI of approximately $0.4 million on certain equity securities held in its available-for-sale
investment portfolio related to financial institutions in Puerto Rico. Management concluded that
the declines in value of the securities were other-than-temporary; as such, the cost basis of these
securities was written down to the market value as of the date of the analysis and is reflected in
earnings as a realized loss.
Total proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale during the first half of 2010
amounted to approximately $733.9 million, excluding $296.5 million of unsettled
securities sold (2009 $791.3 million).
5 OTHER EQUITY SECURITIES
Institutions that are members of the FHLB system are required to maintain a minimum investment
in FHLB stock. Such minimum is calculated as a percentage of aggregate outstanding mortgages, and
an additional investment is required that is calculated as a percentage of total FHLB advances,
letters of credit, and the collateralized portion of interest-rate swaps outstanding. The stock is
capital stock issued at $100 par value. Both stock and cash dividends may be received on FHLB
stock.
As of both June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Corporation had investments in FHLB stock
with a book value of $68.5 million and $68.4 million, respectively. The net realizable value is a
reasonable proxy for the fair value of these instruments.
20
Dividend income from FHLB stock for the
second quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2010 amounted to $0.6 million and $1.4 million,
respectively, compared to $0.8 million and $1.1 million, respectively, for the same periods in
2009.
The FHLB stocks owned by the Corporation are issued by the FHLB of New York and by the FHLB of
Atlanta. Both banks are part of the Federal Home Loan Bank System, a national wholesale banking
network of 12 regional, stockholder-owned congressionally chartered banks. The Federal Home Loan
Banks are all privately capitalized and operated by their member stockholders. The system is
supervised by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which ensures that the Home Loan Banks operate in
a financially safe and sound manner, remain adequately capitalized and able to raise funds in the
capital markets, and carry out their housing finance mission.
The Corporation has other equity securities that do not have a readily available fair value.
The carrying value of such securities as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $1.3 million
and $1.6 million, respectively. An impairment charge of $0.25 million was recorded in the first
quarter of 2010 related to an investment in a failed financial institution in the United States.
During the first quarter of 2010, the Corporation recognized a $10.7 million gain on the sale
of the remaining VISA Class C shares. As of June 30, 2010, the Corporation no longer held any VISA
shares.
6 LOAN PORTFOLIO
The following is a detail of the loan portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Residential mortgage loans, mainly secured by first mortgages |
|
$ |
3,482,167 |
|
|
$ |
3,595,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction loans |
|
|
1,310,065 |
|
|
|
1,492,589 |
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
1,665,551 |
|
|
|
1,693,424 |
|
Commercial and Industrial loans (1) |
|
|
3,931,991 |
|
|
|
4,927,304 |
|
Loans to a local financial institution collateralized by
real estate mortgages |
|
|
304,170 |
|
|
|
321,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans |
|
|
7,211,777 |
|
|
|
8,434,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance leases |
|
|
299,060 |
|
|
|
318,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
1,510,108 |
|
|
|
1,579,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable |
|
|
12,503,112 |
|
|
|
13,928,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
(604,304 |
) |
|
|
(528,120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net |
|
|
11,898,808 |
|
|
|
13,400,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
100,626 |
|
|
|
20,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
11,999,434 |
|
|
$ |
13,421,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 - |
|
As of June 30, 2010, includes $1.5 billion of commercial loans that are
secured by real estate but are not dependent upon the real estate for
repayment. |
The Corporations primary lending area is Puerto Rico. The Corporations Puerto Rico banking
subsidiary, FirstBank, also lends in the U.S. and British Virgin Islands markets and in the United
States (principally in the state of Florida). Of the total gross loan
portfolio, including loans held for sale, of $12.6 billion as
of June 30, 2010, approximately 83% has credit risk concentration in Puerto Rico, 8% in the United
States and 9% in the Virgin Islands
As
of June 30, 2010, the Corporation had $167.3 million
outstanding on credit facilities
granted to the Puerto Rico Government and/or its political subdivisions, down from $1.2 billion as
of December 31, 2009, and $184.1 million granted to the Virgin Islands government. A substantial
portion of these credit facilities are obligations that have a specific source of income or
revenues identified for their repayment, such as property
taxes collected by the central Government and/or municipalities. Another
21
portion of these
obligations consists of loans to public corporations that obtain revenues from rates charged for
services or products, such as electric power and water utilities. Public corporations have varying
degrees of independence from the central Government and many receive appropriations or other
payments from it. The Corporation also has loans to various municipalities in Puerto Rico for which
the good faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable municipality has been pledged
to their repayment.
The largest loan to one borrower as of June 30, 2010 in the amount of $304.2 million is with
one mortgage originator in Puerto Rico, Doral Financial Corporation. This commercial loan is
secured by individual real estate loans, mostly 1-4 residential mortgage loans.
7 ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES
The changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Six-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
575,303 |
|
|
$ |
302,531 |
|
|
$ |
528,120 |
|
|
$ |
281,526 |
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
146,793 |
|
|
|
235,152 |
|
|
|
317,758 |
|
|
|
294,581 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(120,516 |
) |
|
|
(131,375 |
) |
|
|
(246,822 |
) |
|
|
(173,835 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
2,724 |
|
|
|
1,438 |
|
|
|
5,248 |
|
|
|
5,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
604,304 |
|
|
$ |
407,746 |
|
|
$ |
604,304 |
|
|
$ |
407,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The allowance for impaired loans is part of the allowance for loan and lease losses. The
allowance for impaired loans covers those loans for which management has determined that it is
probable that the debtor will be unable to pay all the amounts due in accordance with the
contractual terms of the loan agreement, and does not necessarily represent loans for which the
Corporation will incur a loss. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, impaired loans and their
related allowance were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Impaired loans with valuation allowance, net of charge-offs |
|
$ |
1,305,588 |
|
|
$ |
1,060,088 |
|
Impaired loans without valuation allowance, net of charge-offs |
|
|
565,244 |
|
|
|
596,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
1,870,832 |
|
|
$ |
1,656,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for impaired loans |
|
$ |
277,642 |
|
|
$ |
182,145 |
|
Interest
income of approximately $8.2 million and $15.2 million was recognized on impaired
loans for the second quarter and first half of 2010, respectively, compared to $5.4 million and
$9.8 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2009. The average recorded investment in
impaired loans for the first six-months of 2010 and 2009 was $1.8 billion and $693.4 million,
respectively.
22
The following tables show the activity for impaired loans and the related specific reserve during
the first half of 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired Loans: |
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
1,656,264 |
|
Loans determined impaired during the period |
|
|
570,528 |
|
Net charge-offs (1) |
|
|
(199,635 |
) |
Loans sold, net of charge-offs of $15.6 million (2) |
|
|
(70,749 |
) |
Loans foreclosed, paid in full and partial payments, net of additional disbursements |
|
|
(85,576 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
1,870,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Approximately $94.6 million, or 47%, is related to construction loans. Also,
approximately $30.3 million, or 15% related to two commercial loan relationships in Puerto
Rico. |
|
(2) |
|
Related to one construction loan and two commercial mortgage loans (originally disbursed
as condo-conversion) sold in Florida . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Specific Reserve: |
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
182,145 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
295,132 |
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
(199,635 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
277,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation provides homeownership preservation assistance to its customers through a loss
mitigation program in Puerto Rico and through programs sponsored by the Federal Government. Due to
the nature of the borrowers financial condition, restructurings or loan modifications through
these program as well as other restructurings of individual commercial, commercial mortgage loans,
construction loans and residential mortgages in the U.S. mainland fit the definition of Troubled
Debt Restructuring (TDR). A restructuring of a debt constitutes a TDR if the creditor for
economic or legal reasons related to the debtors financial difficulties grants a concession to the
debtor that it would not otherwise consider. Modifications involve changes in one or more of the
loan terms that bring a defaulted loan current and provide sustainable affordability. Changes may
include the refinancing of any past-due amounts, including interest and escrow, the extension of
the maturity of the loans and modifications of the loan rate. As of June 30, 2010, the
Corporations TDR loans amounted to $452.6 million
consisting of: $161.2 million of residential
mortgage loans, $51.0 million commercial and industrial loans, $100.3 million commercial mortgage
loans and $140.0 million of construction loans. Outstanding unfunded loan commitments on TDR loans
amounted to $0.4 million as of June 30, 2010.
Included
in the $452.6 million of TDR loans are certain impaired condo-conversion loans
restructured into two separate agreements (loan splitting) in the fourth quarter of 2009. Each of
these loans was restructured into two notes: one that represents the portion of the loan that is
expected to be fully collected along with contractual interest and the second note that represents
the portion of the original loan that was charged-off. The restructuring of these loans was made
after analyzing the borrowers and guarantors capacity to service the debt and ability to perform
under the modified terms. As part of the renegotiation of the loans, the first note of each loan
has been placed on a monthly payment of principal and interest that amortizes the debt over 25
years at a market rate of interest. An interest rate reduction was granted for the second note.
As of June 30, 2010, the carrying value of the notes that were deemed collectible amounted to
$22.1 million. Charge-offs recorded prior to 2010 associated with these loans was $29.7 million.
The loans that have been deemed to be collectible continue to be individually evaluated for
impairment purposes and a specific reserve of $3.1 million was allocated to these loans as of June
30, 2010.
As of June 30, 2010, the Corporation maintains a $8.5 million reserve for unfunded loan
commitments mainly related to outstanding construction loans commitments in Puerto Rico. The
reserve for unfunded loan commitments is an estimate of the losses inherent in off-balance sheet
loan commitments at the balance sheet date. It is calculated by multiplying an estimated loss
factor by an estimated probability of funding, and then by the period-end amounts for unfunded
commitments. The reserve for unfunded loan commitments is included as part of accounts payable and
other liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial condition.
8 DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
One of the market risks facing the Corporation is interest rate risk, which includes the risk
that changes in interest rates will result in changes in the value of the Corporations assets or
liabilities and the risk that net interest income from its loan and investment portfolios will be
adversely affected by changes in interest rates. The overall objective of the Corporations
interest rate risk management activities is to reduce the variability of earnings caused by changes
in interest rates.
The Corporation uses various financial instruments, including derivatives, to manage the
interest rate risk primarily for protection from rising interest rates in connection with private
label MBS.
23
The Corporation designates a derivative as a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or an economic
undesignated hedge when it enters into the derivative contract. As of June 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009, all derivatives held by the Corporation were considered economic undesignated hedges.
These undesignated hedges are recorded at fair value with the resulting gain or loss recognized in
current earnings.
The following summarizes the principal derivative activities used by the Corporation in
managing interest rate risk:
Interest rate cap agreements Interest rate cap agreements provide the right to receive cash
if a reference interest rate rises above a contractual rate. The value increases as the reference
interest rate rises. The Corporation enters into interest rate cap agreements for protection from
rising interest rates. Specifically, the interest rate on certain of the Corporations commercial
loans to other financial institutions is generally a variable rate limited to the weighted-average
coupon of the pass-through certificate or referenced residential mortgage collateral, less a
contractual servicing fee. During the second quarter of 2010, the counterparty for interest rate
caps for certain private label mortgage pass-through securities was taken over by the FDIC,
immediately canceling all outstanding commitments, and as a result, interest rate caps with
notional amount of $117 million are no longer considered to be derivative financial instruments.
The total exposure to fair value as of June 30, 2010 of $3.0 million related to such contract was
reclassified to an account receivable.
Interest rate swapsInterest rate swap agreements generally involve the exchange of fixed and
floating-rate interest payment obligations without the exchange of the underlying notional
principal amount. As of June 30, 2010, most of the interest rate swaps outstanding are used for
protection against rising interest rates. In the past, interest rate swaps volume was much higher
since they were used to convert fixed-rate brokered CDs (liabilities), mainly those with long-term
maturities, to a variable rate and mitigate the interest rate risk inherent in variable rate loans.
All interest rate swaps related to brokered CDs were called during 2009, in the face of lower
interest rate levels, and, as a consequence, the Corporation exercised its call option on the
swapped-to-floating brokered CDs. Similar to unrealized gains and losses arising from changes in
fair value, net interest settlements on interest rate swaps are recorded as an adjustment to
interest income or interest expense depending on whether an asset or liability is being
economically hedged.
Indexed options Indexed options are generally over-the-counter (OTC) contracts that the
Corporation enters into in order to receive the appreciation of a specified Stock Index (e.g., Dow
Jones Industrial Composite Stock Index) over a specified period in exchange for a premium paid at
the contracts inception. The option period is determined by the contractual maturity of the notes
payable tied to the performance of the Stock Index. The credit risk inherent in these options is
the risk that the exchange party may not fulfill its obligation. To satisfy the needs of its
customers, the Corporation may enter into non-hedging transactions. On these transactions,
generally, the Corporation participates as a buyer in one of the agreements and as a seller in the
other agreement under the same terms and conditions.
In addition, the Corporation enters into certain contracts with embedded derivatives that do
not require separate accounting as these are clearly and closely related to the economic
characteristics of the host contract. When the embedded derivative possesses economic
characteristics that are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the
host contract, it is bifurcated, carried at fair value, and designated as a trading or non-hedging
derivative instrument.
The following table summarizes the notional amounts of all derivative instruments as of June 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Amounts |
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Economic undesignated hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements used to hedge loans |
|
$ |
42,020 |
|
|
$ |
79,567 |
|
Written interest rate cap agreements |
|
|
79,071 |
|
|
|
102,521 |
|
Purchased interest rate cap agreements (1) |
|
|
79,071 |
|
|
|
228,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded written options on stock index deposits and notes payable |
|
|
53,515 |
|
|
|
53,515 |
|
Purchased options used to manage exposure to the stock
market on embedded stock index options |
|
|
53,515 |
|
|
|
53,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
307,192 |
|
|
$ |
517,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For June 30, 2010, excludes $117 million of terminated interest rate cap agreements. |
The following table summarizes the fair value of derivative instruments and identifies the
location of such derivative instruments in the Statement of Financial Condition as of June 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009:
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Statement of |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Statement of |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Financial Condition |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Financial Condition |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Location |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Location |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Economic undesignated hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements used to hedge loans |
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
393 |
|
|
$ |
319 |
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
$ |
5,202 |
|
|
$ |
5,068 |
|
Written interest rate cap agreements |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
Purchased interest rate cap agreements |
|
Other assets |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
4,423 |
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded written options on stock index deposits |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Embedded written options on stock index notes payable |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
1,184 |
|
Purchased options used to manage exposure to the stock
market on embedded stock index options |
|
Other assets |
|
|
772 |
|
|
|
1,194 |
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,195 |
|
|
$ |
5,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,955 |
|
|
$ |
6,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the effect of derivative instruments on the Statement of Loss
for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
Unrealized Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
|
Location of Unrealized Gain or (loss) |
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Six-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
Recognized in Income on |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Interest rate contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements used to hedge: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokered certificates of deposit |
|
Interest Expense on Deposit |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(877 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5,236 |
) |
Notes payable |
|
Interest Expense on Notes Payable and Other Borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Loans |
|
Interest Income on Loans |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
1,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Written and purchased interest rate cap agreements mortgage-backed securities |
|
Interest Income on Investment Securities |
|
|
(440 |
) |
|
|
2,489 |
|
|
|
(1,137 |
) |
|
|
2,706 |
|
Written and purchased interest rate cap agreements loans |
|
Interest Income on Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded written options on stock index deposits |
|
Interest Expense on Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(82 |
) |
Embedded written options on stock index notes payable |
|
Interest Expense on Notes Payable and Other Borrowings |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (loss) gain on derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(406 |
) |
|
$ |
2,520 |
|
|
$ |
(1,181 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps, are subject to market risk. As is the case
with investment securities, the market value of derivative instruments is largely a function of the
financial markets expectations regarding the future direction of interest rates. Accordingly,
current market values are not necessarily indicative of the future impact of derivative instruments
on earnings. This will depend, for the most part, on the shape of the yield curve, the level of
interest rates, as well as the expectations for rates in the future. The unrealized gains and
losses in the fair value of derivatives that have economically hedged certain callable brokered CDs
and medium-term notes are partially offset by unrealized gains and losses on the valuation of such
economically hedged liabilities measured at fair value. The Corporation includes the gain or loss
on those economically hedged liabilities (brokered CDs and medium-term notes) in the same line item
as the offsetting loss or gain on the related derivatives as set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain / (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain |
|
|
|
|
Gain / (Loss) |
|
on liabilities measured at fair |
|
Net Unrealized |
|
Loss |
|
on liabilities measured at fair |
|
Net Unrealized |
(In thousands) |
|
on Derivatives |
|
value |
|
Gain |
|
on Derivatives |
|
value |
|
Gain / (Loss) |
Interest expense on Deposits |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(892 |
) |
|
$ |
1,555 |
|
|
$ |
663 |
|
Interest expense on Notes Payable and Other Borrowings |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
3,815 |
|
|
|
3,896 |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(1,679 |
) |
|
|
(1,732 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-Month Period ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain / (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain / (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
Gain / (Loss) |
|
on liabilities measured at fair |
|
Net Unrealized |
|
Loss |
|
on liabilities measured at fair |
|
Net Unrealized |
(In thousands) |
|
on Derivatives |
|
value |
|
Gain / (Loss) |
|
on Derivatives |
|
value |
|
Gain / (Loss) |
Interest expense on Deposits |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
(5,318 |
) |
|
|
8,696 |
|
|
$ |
3,378 |
|
Interest expense on Notes Payable and Other Borrowings |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
2,857 |
|
|
|
2,908 |
|
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
(1,424 |
) |
|
|
(1,587 |
) |
25
A summary of interest rate swaps as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
As of |
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Pay fixed/receive floating (generally used to economically hedge loans): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount |
|
$ |
42,020 |
|
|
$ |
79,567 |
|
Weighted-average receive rate at period end |
|
|
2.24 |
% |
|
|
2.15 |
% |
Weighted-average pay rate at period end |
|
|
6.84 |
% |
|
|
6.52 |
% |
Floating rates range from 167 to 252 basis points over 3-month LIBOR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010, the Corporation has not entered into any derivative instrument containing
credit-risk-related contingent features.
9 GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES
Goodwill as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 amounted to $28.1 million, recognized as
part of Other Assets. The Corporation conducted its annual evaluation of goodwill during the
fourth quarter of 2009. This evaluation is a two-step process. The Step 1 evaluation of goodwill
allocated to the Florida reporting unit, which is one level below the United States business
segment, indicated potential impairment of goodwill. The Step 1 fair value for the unit was below
the carrying amount of its equity book value as of the December 31, 2009 valuation date, requiring
the completion of Step 2. The Step 2 required a valuation of all assets and liabilities of the
Florida unit, including any recognized and unrecognized intangible assets, to determine the fair
value of net assets. To complete Step 2, the Corporation subtracted from the units Step 1 fair
value the determined fair value of the net assets to arrive at the implied fair value of goodwill.
The results of the Step 2 analysis indicated that the implied fair value of goodwill exceeded the
goodwill carrying value by $107.4 million, resulting in no goodwill impairment. There have been no
events related to the Florida reporting unit that could indicate potential goodwill impairment
since the date of the last evaluation; therefore, no goodwill impairment evaluation was performed
during the first half of 2010. Goodwill and other indefinite life intangibles are reviewed at least
annually for impairment. The Corporation understands that it is in its best interest to move the
annual evaluation date to an earlier date within the fourth quarter, therefore, the Corporation
will evaluate for goodwill impairment as of October 1, 2010. The change in date will provide room
improvement to the testing structure and coordination and will be performed in conjunction with the
Corporations annual budgeting process.
As of June 30, 2010, the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of core deposit
intangibles was $41.8 million and $26.5 million, respectively, recognized as part of Other Assets
in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition (December 31, 2009 $41.8 million and $25.2
million, respectively). During the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2010, the
amortization expense of core deposit intangibles amounted to $0.6 million and $1.3 million,
respectively, compared to $0.9 million and $1.9 million, respectively, for the comparable periods
in 2009. As a result of an impairment evaluation of core deposit intangibles, there was an
impairment charge of $4.0 million recognized during the first half of 2009 related to core deposits
in Florida attributable to decreases in the base of core deposits acquired and recorded as part of
other non-interest expenses in the Statement of (Loss) Income.
10 NON-CONSOLIDATED VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES AND SERVICING ASSETS
The Corporation transfers residential mortgage loans in sale or securitization transactions in
which it has continuing involvement, which includes servicing responsibilities and guarantee
arrangements. All such transfers have been accounted for as sales as required by applicable
accounting guidance.
When evaluating transfers and other transactions with variable interest entities for
consolidation under the newly adopted guidance, the Corporation first determines if the
counterparty is an entity for which a variable interest exists. If no scope exception is applicable
and a variable interest exists, the Corporation then evaluates if it is the primary beneficiary of
the variable interest entity and whether the entity should be consolidated or not.
Below is a summary of transfers of financial assets to Variable Interest Entities (VIEs) for
which the Company has retained some level of continuing involvement:
Ginnie Mae
The Corporation typically transfers first lien residential mortgage loans in conjunction with
Ginnie Mae securitization transactions whereby the loans are exchanged for cash or securities that
are readily redeemed for cash proceeds and servicing rights.
26
The securities issued through these
transactions are guaranteed by the issuer and, as such, under seller/servicer agreements the
Corporation is required to service the loans in accordance with the issuers servicing guidelines
and standards. As of June 30, 2010, the Corporation serviced loans securitized through GNMA with
principal balance of $381 million.
Trust Preferred Securities
In 2004, FBP Statutory Trust I, a financing subsidiary of the Corporation, sold to
institutional investors $100 million of its variable rate trust preferred securities. The proceeds
of the issuance, together with the proceeds of the purchase by the Corporation of $3.1 million of
FBP Statutory Trust I variable rate common securities, were used by FBP Statutory Trust I to
purchase $103.1 million aggregate principal amount of the Corporations Junior Subordinated
Deferrable Debentures. Also in 2004, FBP Statutory Trust II, a statutory trust that is wholly-owned
by the Corporation, sold to institutional investors $125 million of its variable rate trust
preferred securities. The proceeds of the issuance, together with the proceeds of the purchase by
the Corporation of $3.9 million of FBP Statutory Trust II variable rate common securities, were
used by FBP Statutory Trust II to purchase $128.9 million aggregate principal amount of the
Corporations Junior Subordinated Deferrable Debentures. The trust preferred debentures are
presented in the Corporations Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition as Other Borrowings,
net of related issuance costs. The variable rate trust preferred securities are fully and
unconditionally guaranteed by the Corporation. The $100 million Junior Subordinated Deferrable
Debentures issued by the Corporation in April 2004 and the $125 million issued in September 2004
mature on September 17, 2034 and September 20, 2034, respectively; however, under certain
circumstances, the maturity of Junior Subordinated Debentures may be shortened (such shortening
would result in a mandatory redemption of the variable rate trust preferred securities). The trust
preferred securities, subject to certain limitations, presently qualify as Tier I regulatory capital under
current Federal Reserve rules and regulations.
The Collins Amendment to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act eliminates certain trust preferred securities
from Tier I Capital. TARP preferred securities are excepted from this
treatment. These regulatory capital deductions for trust
preferred securities are to be phases in incrementally over a period of
3 years beginning on January 1, 2013.
Grantor Trusts
During 2004 and 2005, a third party to the Corporation, from now on identified as the seller,
established a series of statutory trusts to effect the securitization of mortgage loans and the
sale of trust certificates. The seller initially provided the servicing for a fee, which is senior
to the obligations to pay trust certificate holders. The seller then entered into a sales agreement
through which it sold and issued the trust certificates in favor of the Corporations banking
subsidiary. Currently the Bank is the 100% owner of the trust certificates; the servicing of the
underlying residential mortgages that generate the principal and interest cash flows, is performed
by the seller, which receives a fee compensation for services provided, the servicing fee. The
securities are variable rate securities tied to LIBOR index plus a spread. The principal payments
from the underlying loans are remitted to a paying agent (the seller) who then remits interest to
the Bank; interest income is shared to a certain extent with a third party financial institution
that has an interest only strip (IO) tied to the cash flows of the underlying loans, whereas it
is entitled to received the excess of the interest income less a servicing fee over the variable
rate income that the Bank earns on the securities. This IO is limited to the weighted average
coupon of the securities. No recourse agreement exists and the risk from losses on non accruing
loans and repossessed collateral is absorbed by the Bank as the 100% holder of the certificates.
As of June 30, 2010, the outstanding balance of Grantor Trusts amounted to $109.5 million with a
weighted average yield of 2.51%.
Servicing Assets
The Corporation is actively involved in the securitization of pools of FHA-insured and
VA-guaranteed mortgages for issuance of GNMA mortgage-backed securities. Also, certain conventional
conforming-loans are sold to FNMA or FHLMC with servicing retained. The Corporation recognizes as
separate assets the rights to service loans for others, whether those servicing assets are
originated or purchased.
27
The changes in servicing assets are shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
Six-month period ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
12,594 |
|
|
$ |
8,738 |
|
|
$ |
11,902 |
|
|
$ |
8,151 |
|
Capitalization of servicing assets |
|
|
1,377 |
|
|
|
2,039 |
|
|
|
3,063 |
|
|
|
3,181 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
(497 |
) |
|
|
(629 |
) |
|
|
(932 |
) |
|
|
(1,184 |
) |
Adjustment to servicing assets for loans repurchased (1) |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(698 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance before valuation allowance at end of period |
|
|
13,335 |
|
|
|
10,148 |
|
|
|
13,335 |
|
|
|
10,148 |
|
Valuation allowance for temporary impairment |
|
|
(282 |
) |
|
|
(1,796 |
) |
|
|
(282 |
) |
|
|
(1,796 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
13,053 |
|
|
$ |
8,352 |
|
|
$ |
13,053 |
|
|
$ |
8,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount represents the adjustment to fair value related to the repurchase of $13.9 million and
$67.4 million for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2010, respectively, in principal balance of loans serviced for others. |
Impairment charges are recognized through a valuation allowance for each individual stratum of
servicing assets. The valuation allowance is adjusted to reflect the amount, if any, by which the
cost basis of the servicing asset for a given stratum of loans being serviced exceeds its fair
value. Any fair value in excess of the cost basis of the servicing asset for a given stratum is not
recognized. Other-than-temporary impairments, if any, are recognized as a direct write-down of the
servicing assets.
Changes in the impairment allowance were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
Six-month period ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
1,504 |
|
|
$ |
745 |
|
|
$ |
751 |
|
Temporary impairment charges |
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
2,145 |
|
Recoveries |
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
(503 |
) |
|
|
(815 |
) |
|
|
(1,100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
282 |
|
|
$ |
1,796 |
|
|
$ |
282 |
|
|
$ |
1,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of net servicing income are shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
Six-month period ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Servicing fees |
|
$ |
1,008 |
|
|
$ |
693 |
|
|
$ |
1,936 |
|
|
$ |
1,344 |
|
Late charges and prepayment penalties |
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
Adjustment for loans repurchased |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(698 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing income, gross |
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
1,559 |
|
|
|
1,825 |
|
Recovery (amortization and impairment) of servicing assets |
|
|
(599 |
) |
|
|
(921 |
) |
|
|
(469 |
) |
|
|
(2,229 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing income (loss), net |
|
$ |
476 |
|
|
$ |
(55 |
) |
|
$ |
1,090 |
|
|
$ |
(404 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
The Corporations servicing assets are subject to prepayment and interest rate risks. Key
economic assumptions used in determining the fair value at the time of sale ranged as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
Minimum |
Six-month period ended June 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Constant prepayment rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government guaranteed mortgage loans |
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
Conventional conforming mortgage loans |
|
|
16.2 |
% |
|
|
14.8 |
% |
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans |
|
|
13.4 |
% |
|
|
11.5 |
% |
Discount rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government guaranteed mortgage loans |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
Conventional conforming mortgage loans |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
9.2 |
% |
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans |
|
|
13.1 |
% |
|
|
13.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-month period ended June 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Constant prepayment rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government guaranteed mortgage loans |
|
|
24.8 |
% |
|
|
22.9 |
% |
Conventional conforming mortgage loans |
|
|
21.9 |
% |
|
|
20.4 |
% |
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans |
|
|
20.1 |
% |
|
|
18.5 |
% |
Discount rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government guaranteed mortgage loans |
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
11.8 |
% |
Conventional conforming mortgage loans |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
9.2 |
% |
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans |
|
|
13.2 |
% |
|
|
13.2 |
% |
At June 30, 2010, fair values of the Corporations servicing assets were based on a valuation
model that incorporates market driven assumptions, adjusted by the particular characteristics of
the Corporations servicing portfolio, regarding discount rates and mortgage prepayment rates. The
weighted-averages of the key economic assumptions used by the Corporation in its valuation model
and the sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate 10 percent and 20 percent adverse
changes in those assumptions for mortgage loans at June 30, 2010, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Carrying amount of servicing assets |
|
$ |
13,053 |
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
14,456 |
|
Weighted-average expected life (in years) |
|
|
7.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Constant prepayment rate (weighted-average annual rate) |
|
|
14.06 |
% |
Decrease in fair value due to 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
160 |
|
Decrease in fair value due to 20% adverse change |
|
$ |
827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate (weighted-average annual rate) |
|
|
10.46 |
% |
Decrease in fair value due to 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
551 |
|
Decrease in fair value due to 20% adverse change |
|
$ |
1,062 |
|
These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate,
changes in fair value based on a 10 percent variation in assumptions generally cannot be
extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may
not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the
fair value of the servicing asset is calculated without changing any other assumption; in reality,
changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example, increases in market interest
rates may result in lower prepayments), which may magnify or counteract the sensitivities.
29
11 DEPOSITS
The following table summarizes deposit balances:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Type of account and interest rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing checking accounts |
|
$ |
715,166 |
|
|
$ |
697,022 |
|
Savings accounts |
|
|
1,935,815 |
|
|
|
1,761,646 |
|
Interest-bearing checking accounts |
|
|
1,108,032 |
|
|
|
998,097 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
1,862,719 |
|
|
|
1,650,866 |
|
Brokered certificates of deposit |
|
|
7,105,843 |
|
|
|
7,561,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,727,575 |
|
|
$ |
12,669,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokered CDs mature as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
One to ninety days |
|
$ |
1,022,928 |
|
Over ninety days to one year |
|
|
2,489,688 |
|
One to three years |
|
|
3,271,217 |
|
Three to five years |
|
|
310,717 |
|
Over five years |
|
|
11,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,105,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following are the components of interest expense on deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Six-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thosands) |
|
|
(In thosands) |
|
Interest expense on deposits |
|
$ |
58,444 |
|
|
$ |
75,058 |
|
|
$ |
118,944 |
|
|
$ |
166,000 |
|
Amortization of broker placement fees |
|
|
5,322 |
|
|
|
5,063 |
|
|
|
10,787 |
|
|
|
12,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on deposits excluding net unrealized (gain) loss on
derivatives and brokered CDs measured at fair value |
|
|
63,766 |
|
|
|
80,121 |
|
|
|
129,731 |
|
|
|
178,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives and brokered CDs measured at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(663 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(3,378 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense on deposits |
|
$ |
63,766 |
|
|
$ |
79,458 |
|
|
$ |
129,732 |
|
|
$ |
174,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The interest expense on deposits includes the valuation to market of interest rate swaps that
economically hedged brokered CDs, the related interest exchanged, the amortization of broker
placement fees related to brokered CDs not measured at fair value and changes in fair value of
callable brokered CDs measured at fair value.
Total interest expense on deposits includes net cash settlements on interest rate swaps that
economically hedged brokered CDs and that, for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30,
2009, amounted to net interest realized of $0.8 million and $5.5 million, respectively. No amount
was recognized for the first half of 2010 since all interest rate swaps related to brokered CDs
were called in 2009.
12 LOANS PAYABLE
Loans payable consisted of short-term borrowings under the FED Discount Window Program. During
the second quarter of 2010, the Corporation repaid the remaining balance under the Discount Window.
As the capital markets recovered from the crisis witnessed in 2009, the FED gradually reversed its
stance back to lender of last resort. Advances from the Discount Window are once again discouraged,
and as such, the Corporation no longer plans to use FED Advances for regular funding needs.
30
13 SECURITIES SOLD UNDER AGREEMENTS TO REPURCHASE
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (repurchase agreements) consist of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Repurchase agreements, interest ranging from 0.30% to 5.39%
(2009 0.23% to 5.39%) |
|
$ |
2,584,438 |
|
|
$ |
3,076,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase agreements mature as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
One to thirty days |
|
$ |
184,438 |
|
Over ninety days to one year |
|
|
300,000 |
|
One to three years |
|
|
1,300,000 |
|
Three to five years |
|
|
800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,584,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the securities underlying such agreements were delivered
to the dealers with whom the repurchase agreements were transacted.
Repurchase agreements as of June 30, 2010, grouped by counterparty, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
Counterparty |
|
Amount |
|
|
Maturity (In Months) |
|
Credit Suisse First Boston |
|
$ |
884,438 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Citigroup Global Markets |
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Barclays Capital |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Dean Witter / Morgan Stanley |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
JP Morgan Chase |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
UBS Financial Services, Inc. |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,584,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 ADVANCES FROM THE FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK (FHLB)
Following is a summary of the advances from the FHLB:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Fixed-rate advances from FHLB, with a weighted-average
interest rate of 3.18% (2009 3.21%) |
|
$ |
940,440 |
|
|
$ |
978,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
Advances from FHLB mature as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
One to thirty days |
|
$ |
105,000 |
|
Over ninety days to one year |
|
|
315,000 |
|
One to three years |
|
|
462,000 |
|
Three to five years |
|
|
58,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
940,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010, the Corporation had additional capacity of approximately $242.4 million
on this credit facility based on collateral pledged at the FHLB, including haircuts reflecting the
perceived risk associated with holding the collateral.
15 NOTES PAYABLE
Notes payable consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Callable step-rate notes, bearing step increasing interest
from 5.00% to 7.00% (5.50% as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009)
maturing on October 18, 2019, measured at fair value |
|
$ |
10,504 |
|
|
$ |
13,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) linked principal protected notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A maturing on February 28, 2012 |
|
|
6,403 |
|
|
|
6,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B maturing on May 27, 2011 |
|
|
7,152 |
|
|
|
7,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
24,059 |
|
|
$ |
27,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 OTHER BORROWINGS
Other borrowings consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Junior subordinated debentures due in 2034,
interest-bearing at a floating-rate of 2.75%
over 3-month LIBOR (3.29% as of June 30, 2010
and 3.00% as of December 31, 2009) |
|
$ |
103,093 |
|
|
$ |
103,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures due in 2034,
interest-bearing at a floating-rate of 2.50%
over 3-month LIBOR (3.04% as of June 30, 2010
and 2.75% as of December 31, 2009) |
|
|
128,866 |
|
|
|
128,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
231,959 |
|
|
$ |
231,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
17 STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Common stock
As of June 30, 2010, the Corporation had 750,000,000 authorized shares of common stock with a
par value of $1 per share. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, there were 102,440,522 shares
issued and 92,542,722 shares outstanding. In February 2009, the Corporations Board of Directors
declared a first quarter cash dividend of $0.07 per common share which was paid on March 31, 2009
to common stockholders of record on March 15, 2009 and in May 2009 declared a second quarter
dividend of $0.07 per common share which was paid on June 30, 2009 to common stockholders of record
on June 15, 2009. On July 30, 2009, the Corporation announced the suspension of common and
preferred dividends effective with the preferred dividend for the month of August 2009.
On April 27, 2010, the Corporations stockholders approved an increase in the Corporations
authorized shares of common stock from 250 million to 750 million. Subsequently, the Corporation
commenced the Exchange Offer to issue 256,401,610 shares of common stock in exchange for the
Corporations outstanding Preferred Stock and issued shares of Series G Preferred Stock in exchange
for Series F Preferred Stock, as discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements. The Corporation
additionally plans to seek to raise $500 million in a Capital
Raise. If the Capital Raise is successful, the Corporation also expects
to offer the current stockholders the opportunity to buy one share of
common stock for each share
of common stock they own at the purchase price set forth in the Capital Raise. The Corporation
estimates that it would issue an additional 1.43 billion shares after the completion of the
Exchange Offer as a result of conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock, the Capital Raise and the
issuance of shares to Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) in accordance with its anti-dilution right in the
Stockholder Agreement executed when BNS bought its approximately 10% of the common stock. The
estimate is based on a sale in a Capital Raise of $500 million at an assumed per share price of
$0.57, the market price of the Corporations common stock on July 14, 2010, and a sale to BNS of
the maximum number of shares it could buy upon exercise of its anti-dilution right. Given these
assumptions, the Corporation will need additional authorized shares. Accordingly, the Corporations
Board of Directors has proposed to increase the number of authorized shares of the Corporations
common stock from 750 million to 2 billion. The Corporation believes that this increase will enable
it to complete the transactions described above. A Special Meeting has been scheduled for August
26, 2010 to vote on this and other matters. Refer to Note 24 for additional information regarding
capital transactions occurring after June 30, 2010.
Stock repurchase plan and treasury stock
The Corporation has a stock repurchase program under which from time to time it repurchases
shares of common stock in the open market and holds them as treasury stock. No shares of common
stock were repurchased during 2010 and 2009 by the Corporation. As of June 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009, of the total amount of common stock repurchased in prior years, 9,897,800 shares were
held as treasury stock and were available for general corporate purposes.
Preferred stock
The Corporation has 50,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock with a par value of $1,
redeemable at the Corporations option subject to certain terms. This stock may be issued in series
and the shares of each series shall have such rights and preferences as shall be fixed by the Board
of Directors when authorizing the issuance of that particular series. As of June 30, 2010, the
Corporation has five outstanding series of non-convertible non-cumulative preferred stock which
trade on the NYSE: 7.125% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series A; 8.35%
non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series B; 7.40% noncumulative perpetual
monthly income preferred stock, Series C; 7.25% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred
stock, Series D; and 7.00% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series E. The
liquidation value per share is $25. Annual dividends of $1.75 per share (Series E), $1.8125 per
share (Series D), $1.85 per share (Series C), $2.0875 per share (Series B) and $1.78125 per share
(Series A) are payable monthly, if declared by the Board of Directors. Dividends declared on the
non-convertible non-cumulative preferred stock for the first half of 2009 amounted to $20.1
million; consistent with the Corporations announcement in July 2009, no dividends have been
declared for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010.
In January 2009, in connection with the TARP Capital Purchase Program, established as part of
the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, the Corporation issued to the U.S. Treasury
400,000 shares of its Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series F, $1,000 liquidation
preference value per share. On July 20, 2010, pursuant to the
Exchange Agreement executed with the U.S. Treasury on July 7, 2010, the Corporation issued Series G Preferred Stock in
exchange for the Series F Preferred Stock, which as discussed earlier, is convertible into common
stock subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. In connection with the Exchange Agreement, the Corporation also issued to the U.S. Treasury an amended
10-year warrant (the Warrant) to purchase 5,842,259 shares of the Corporations common stock at
an exercise price of $0.7252 per share instead of the exercise price on the original warrant of
$10.27 per share. As of June 30, 2010 the Corporation registered the Series F Preferred Stock, the Warrant and the
shares of common stock underlying the Warrant for sale under the Securities Act of 1933. The
Corporation recorded the total $400 million of the Series F
Preferred Stock and the original Warrant at
their relative fair values of $374.2 million and $25.8 million, respectively. The Series F
Preferred Stock was valued using a discounted
cash flow analysis and applying a discount rate of 10.9%. The difference from the par amount
of the Series F Preferred Stock is accreted to preferred stock over five years using the interest
method with a corresponding adjustment to preferred dividends. The Cox-
33
Rubinstein binomial model
was used to estimate the value of the Warrant with a strike price calculated, pursuant to the
Securities Purchase Agreement with the U.S. Treasury, based on the average closing prices of the
common stock on the 20 trading days ending the last day prior to the date of approval to
participate in the Program. No credit risk was assumed given the Corporations availability of
authorized, but unissued common shares, as well as its intention of reserving sufficient shares to
satisfy the exercise of the warrants. The volatility parameter input was the historical 5-year
common stock price volatility.
Like the Series F Preferred Stock, the Series G Preferred Stock, qualifies as Tier 1
regulatory capital. Cumulative dividends on the Series G Preferred Stock accrue on the liquidation
preference amount on a quarterly basis at a rate of 5% per annum for the first five years, and
thereafter at a rate of 9% per annum, but will only be paid when, as and if declared by the
Corporations Board of Directors out of assets legally available therefore. The Series G Preferred
Stock ranks pari passu with the Corporations existing Series A through E, in terms of dividend
payments and distributions upon liquidation, dissolution and winding up of the Corporation. The
Purchase Agreement relating to this issuance contains limitations on the payment of dividends on
common stock, including limiting regular quarterly cash dividends to an amount not exceeding the
last quarterly cash dividend paid per share, or the amount publicly announced (if lower), of common
stock prior to October 14, 2008, which is $0.07 per share. As of June 30, 2010, cumulative
preferred dividends not declared on the Series F Preferred Stock amounted to $22.6 million, including $10.0 million corresponding
to the first half of 2010, which were exchanged for shares of
Series G Preferred Stock in July 2010.
The Warrant has a 10-year term and is exercisable at any time. The exercise price and the
number of shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrant are subject to certain anti-dilution
adjustments.
The possible future issuance of equity securities through the exercise of the Warrant could
affect the Corporations current stockholders in a number of ways, including by:
diluting the voting power of the current holders of common stock (the shares underlying the
warrant represent approximately 6% of the Corporations shares of common stock as of June 30,
2010);
diluting the earnings per share and book value per share of the outstanding shares of
common stock; and
making the payment of dividends on common stock more expensive.
As mentioned above, on July 30, 2009, the Corporation announced the suspension of dividends
for common and all its outstanding series of preferred stock. This suspension was effective with
the dividends for the month of August 2009, on the Corporations five outstanding series of
non-cumulative preferred stock and dividends for the Corporations outstanding Series F Cumulative
Preferred Stock and the Corporations common stock. As a result of the dividend suspension, the
terms of the Series F Cumulative Preferred Stock include limitations on the resumption of the
payment of cash dividends and purchases of outstanding shares of common and preferred stock.
18 INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense includes Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands income taxes as well as applicable
U.S. federal and state taxes. The Corporation is subject to Puerto Rico income tax on its income
from all sources. As a Puerto Rico corporation, First BanCorp is treated as a foreign corporation
for U.S. income tax purposes and is generally subject to United States income tax only on its
income from sources within the United States or income effectively connected with the conduct of a
trade or business within the United States. Any such tax paid is creditable, within certain
conditions and limitations, against the Corporations Puerto Rico tax liability. The Corporation is
also subject to U.S.Virgin Islands taxes on its income from sources within that jurisdiction. Any
such tax paid is also creditable against the Corporations Puerto Rico tax liability, subject to
certain conditions and limitations.
Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994, as amended (the PR Code), the
Corporation and its subsidiaries are treated as separate taxable entities and are not entitled to
file consolidated tax returns and, thus, the Corporation is not able to utilize losses from one
subsidiary to offset gains in another subsidiary. Accordingly, in order to obtain a tax benefit
from a net operating loss, a particular subsidiary must be able to demonstrate sufficient taxable
income within the applicable carry forward period (7 years under the PR Code). The PR Code provides
a dividend received deduction of 100% on dividends received from controlled subsidiaries subject
to taxation in Puerto Rico and 85% on dividends received from other taxable domestic corporations.
Dividend payments from a U.S. subsidiary to the Corporation are subject to a 10% withholding tax
based on the provisions of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Under the PR Code, First BanCorp is
subject to a maximum statutory tax rate of 39%. In 2009, the Puerto Rico Government approved Act
No. 7 (the Act), to stimulate Puerto Ricos economy and to reduce the Puerto Rico Governments
fiscal deficit. The Act imposes a series of temporary and permanent measures, including the
imposition of a 5% surtax over the total income tax determined, which is applicable to
corporations, among others, whose combined income exceeds $100,000, effectively resulting in an
increase in the maximum statutory tax rate from 39% to 40.95% and an increase in the capital gain
statutory tax rate from 15% to 15.75%. This temporary measure is effective for tax years that
commenced after December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012. The PR Code also
includes an alternative minimum tax of 22% that applies if the Corporations regular income
tax liability is less than the alternative minimum tax requirements.
34
The Corporation has maintained an effective tax rate lower than the maximum statutory rate
mainly by investing in government obligations and mortgage-backed securities exempt from U.S. and
Puerto Rico income taxes and by doing business through International Banking Entities (IBEs) of
the the Corporation and the Bank and through the Banks subsidiary, FirstBank Overseas Corporation,
in which the interest income and gain on sales is exempt from Puerto Rico and U.S. income taxation.
Under the Act, all IBEs are subject to the special 5% tax on their net income not otherwise subject
to tax pursuant to the PR Code. This temporary measure is also effective for tax years that
commenced after December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012. The IBEs and FirstBank Overseas
Corporation were created under the International Banking Entity Act of Puerto Rico, which provides
for total Puerto Rico tax exemption on net income derived by IBEs operating in Puerto Rico. IBEs
that operate as a unit of a bank pay income taxes at normal rates to the extent that the IBEs net
income exceeds 20% of the banks total net taxable income.
For the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2010, the Corporation recognized an income
tax expense of $3.8 million and $10.7 million, respectively, compared to an income tax benefit of
$98.1 million and $112.3 million recorded for the same periods in 2009. The variance in income tax
expense mainly resulted from non-cash charges of approximately $45.1 million for the second quarter
of 2010 and $86.0 million for the first half of 2010 to increase the valuation allowance of the
Corporations deferred tax asset. Most of the increase is related to deferred tax assets created
in 2010 that were fully reserved. Approximately $3.5 million of the increase to the valuation
allowance, which was recorded in the first quarter of 2010, was related to deferred tax assets
created before 2010 and the remaining income tax expense is related to the operations of profitable
subsidiaries.
As of June 30, 2010, the deferred tax asset, net of a valuation allowance of $277.7 million,
amounted to $97.2 million compared to $109.2 million as of December 31, 2009. In addition to the
aforementioned $3.5 million increase in the valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets
created prior to 2010, the decrease in the deferred tax asset during 2010 was mainly related to the
creation of deferred tax liabilities in connection with unrealized gains on available for sale
securities; such charge was recorded as part of other comprehensive income.
Accounting for income taxes requires that companies assess whether a valuation allowance
should be recorded against their deferred tax assets based on the consideration of all available
evidence, using a more likely than not realization standard. Valuation allowances are
established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than
not to be realized. In making such assessment, significant weight is to be given to evidence that
can be objectively verified, including both positive and negative evidence. The accounting for
income taxes guidance requires the consideration of all sources of taxable income available to
realize the deferred tax asset, including the future reversal of existing temporary differences,
future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, taxable
income in carryback years and tax planning strategies. In estimating taxes, management assesses
the relative merits and risks of the appropriate tax treatment of transactions taking into account
statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance, and recognizes tax benefits only when deemed probable.
In assessing the weight of positive and negative evidence, a significant negative factor that
has resulted in increases of the valuation allowance was that the Corporations banking subsidiary
FirstBank Puerto Rico continues in a three-year historical cumulative loss as of the end of the
second quarter of 2010, mainly as a result of charges to the provision for loan and lease losses,
especially in the construction loan portfolio in both, Puerto Rico and Florida markets, as a result
of the economic downturn. As of June 30, 2010, management concluded that $97.2 million of the
deferred tax assets will be realized. In assessing the likelihood of realizing the deferred tax
assets, management has considered all four sources of taxable income mentioned above and, even
though the Corporation expects to be profitable in the near future and be able to realize the
deferred tax asset, given current uncertain economic conditions, the Corporation has only relied on
tax-planning strategies as the main source of taxable income to realize the deferred tax asset
amount. Among the most significant tax-planning strategies identified are: (i) sale of appreciated
assets, (ii) consolidation of profitable and unprofitable companies (in Puerto Rico each company
files a separate tax return; no consolidated tax returns are permitted), and (iii) deferral of
deductions without affecting their utilization. Management will continue monitoring the likelihood
of realizing the deferred tax assets in future periods. If future events differ from managements
June 30, 2010 assessment, an additional valuation allowance may need to be established, which may
have a material adverse effect on the Corporations results of operations. Similarly, to the
extent the realization of a portion, or all, of the tax asset becomes more likely than not based
on changes in circumstances (such as, improved earnings, changes in tax laws or other relevant
changes), a reversal of that portion of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance will then be
recorded.
The increase in the valuation allowance does not have any impact on the Corporations
liquidity or cash flow, nor does such an allowance preclude the Corporation from using tax losses,
tax credits or other deferred tax assets in the future.
The income tax provision in 2010 and 2009 was also impacted by adjustments to deferred tax
amounts as a result of the aforementioned changes to the PR Code enacted tax rates. Deferred tax
amounts have been adjusted for the effect of the change in the income tax rate considering the
enacted tax rate expected to apply to taxable income in the period in which the deferred tax asset
or liability is expected to be settled or realized and an adjustment of $1.0 million and $7.3
million was recorded for the second quarter and first half of 2010, respectively.
35
FASB guidance prescribes a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition,
measurement, presentation and disclosure of income tax uncertainties with respect to positions
taken or expected to be taken on income tax returns. Under the authoritative accounting guidance,
income tax benefits are recognized and measured based upon a two-step model: 1) a tax position must
be more likely than not to be sustained based solely on its technical merits in order to be
recognized, and 2) the benefit is measured as the largest dollar amount of that position that is
more likely than not to be sustained upon settlement. The difference between the benefit recognized
in accordance with this model and the tax benefit claimed on a tax return is referred to as an
unrecognized tax benefits (UTB).
During the second quarter of 2009, the Corporation reversed UTBs of $10.8 million and related
accrued interest of $3.5 million due to the lapse of the statute of limitations for the 2004
taxable year. Also, in July 2009, the Corporation entered into an agreement with the Puerto Rico
Department of the Treasury to conclude an income tax audit and to eliminate all possible income and
withholding tax deficiencies related to taxable years 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008. As a result of
such agreement, the Corporation reversed during the third quarter of 2009 the remaining UTBs and
related interest by approximately $2.9 million, net of the payment made to the Puerto Rico
Department of the Treasury in connection with the conclusion of the tax audit. There were no UTBs
outstanding as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
The Corporation classified all interest and penalties, if any, related to tax uncertainties as
income tax expense. For the first half of 2009, the total amount of interest recognized by the
Corporation as part of income tax expense was $0.5 million. The amount of UTBs may increase or
decrease for various reasons, including changes in the amounts for current tax year positions, the
expiration of open income tax returns due to the expiration of statutes of limitations, changes in
managements judgment about the level of uncertainty, the status of examinations, litigation and
legislative activity and the addition or elimination of uncertain tax positions.
19 FAIR VALUE
Fair Value Option
Medium-Term Notes
The Corporation elected the fair value option for certain medium term notes that were hedged
with interest rate swaps that were previously designated for fair value hedge accounting. As of
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, these medium-term notes had a fair value of $10.5 million and
$13.4 million, respectively, and principal balance of $15.4 million recorded in notes payable.
Interest paid/accrued on these instruments is recorded as part of interest expense and the accrued
interest is part of the fair value of the notes. Electing the fair value option allows the
Corporation to eliminate the burden of complying with the requirements for hedge accounting (e.g.,
documentation and effectiveness assessment) without introducing earnings volatility.
Medium-term notes for which the Corporation elected the fair value option were priced using
observable market data in the institutional markets.
Callable brokered CDs
In the past, the Corporation also measured at fair value callable brokered CDs. All of the
brokered CDs measured at fair value were called during 2009.
Fair Value Measurement
The FASB authoritative guidance for fair value measurement defines fair value as the exchange
price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the
principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants on the measurement date. This guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy
which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of
unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Three levels of inputs may be used to measure fair
value:
Level 1 Valuations of Level 1 assets and liabilities are obtained from readily available
pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities. Level 1
assets and liabilities include equity securities that are traded in an active exchange
market, as well as certain U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government and agency securities and
corporate debt securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active markets.
Level 2 Valuations of Level 2 assets and liabilities are based on observable inputs other
than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, or other inputs
that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the
full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities include (i)
mortgage-backed securities for which the fair value is estimated based on the value of
identical or comparable assets, (ii) debt securities with quoted prices that are traded less
frequently than exchange-traded instruments and (iii) derivative contracts and financial
liabilities (e.g.,
36
medium-term notes elected to be measured at fair value) whose value is determined using a
pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally
from or corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 Valuations of Level 3 assets and liabilities are based on unobservable inputs that
are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of
the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose
value is determined using pricing models for which the determination of fair value requires
significant management judgment or estimation.
For the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2010, there have been no transfers into or
out of Level 1 and Level 2 measurements of the fair value hierarchy.
Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The information about the estimated fair value of financial instruments required by GAAP is
presented hereunder. The aggregate fair value amounts presented do not necessarily represent
managements estimate of the underlying value of the Corporation.
The estimated fair value is subjective in nature and involves uncertainties and matters of
significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in the underlying
assumptions used in calculating fair value could significantly affect the results. In addition, the
fair value estimates are based on outstanding balances without attempting to estimate the value of
anticipated future business.
The following table presents the estimated fair value and carrying value of financial
instruments as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Financial |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Condition |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Condition |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
6/30/2010 |
|
|
6/30/2010 |
|
|
12/31/2009 |
|
|
12/31/2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks and money
market investments |
|
$ |
545,091 |
|
|
$ |
545,091 |
|
|
$ |
704,084 |
|
|
$ |
704,084 |
|
Investment securities available
for sale |
|
|
3,954,910 |
|
|
|
3,954,910 |
|
|
|
4,170,782 |
|
|
|
4,170,782 |
|
Investment securities held to maturity |
|
|
533,302 |
|
|
|
562,334 |
|
|
|
601,619 |
|
|
|
621,584 |
|
Other equity securities |
|
|
69,843 |
|
|
|
69,843 |
|
|
|
69,930 |
|
|
|
69,930 |
|
Loans receivable, including loans
held for sale |
|
|
12,603,738 |
|
|
|
11,451,577 |
|
|
|
13,949,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: allowance for loan and
lease losses |
|
|
(604,304 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(528,120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of allowance |
|
|
11,999,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,421,106 |
|
|
|
12,811,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives, included in assets |
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
5,936 |
|
|
|
5,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
12,727,575 |
|
|
|
12,865,705 |
|
|
|
12,669,047 |
|
|
|
12,801,811 |
|
Loans payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900,000 |
|
|
|
900,000 |
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
2,584,438 |
|
|
|
2,778,962 |
|
|
|
3,076,631 |
|
|
|
3,242,110 |
|
Advances from FHLB |
|
|
940,440 |
|
|
|
983,881 |
|
|
|
978,440 |
|
|
|
1,025,605 |
|
Notes Payable |
|
|
24,059 |
|
|
|
22,120 |
|
|
|
27,117 |
|
|
|
25,716 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
231,959 |
|
|
|
66,330 |
|
|
|
231,959 |
|
|
|
80,267 |
|
Derivatives, included in liabilities |
|
|
5,955 |
|
|
|
5,955 |
|
|
|
6,467 |
|
|
|
6,467 |
|
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including financial
liabilities for which the Corporation has elected the fair value option, are summarized below:
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010 |
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets / Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets / Liabilities |
(In thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
at Fair Value |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
at Fair Value |
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
303 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
303 |
|
U.S. Treasury Securities |
|
|
608,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
608,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-callable U.S. agency debt |
|
|
304,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Callable U.S. agency debt and MBS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,822,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,822,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,949,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,949,799 |
|
Puerto Rico Government Obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,853 |
|
|
|
2,584 |
|
|
|
138,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,326 |
|
Private label MBS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,858 |
|
|
|
80,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,354 |
|
|
|
84,354 |
|
Derivatives, included in assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
319 |
|
Purchased interest rate cap agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
4,199 |
|
|
|
4,423 |
|
Purchased options used to manage exposure to the stock market on embeded stock indexed options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,194 |
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medium-term notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,361 |
|
Derivatives, included in liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,068 |
|
Written interest rate cap agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201 |
|
Embedded written options on stock index
deposits and notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Fair Value for the Quarter Ended |
|
|
Changes in Fair Value for the Six-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2010, for items Measured at Fair Value |
|
|
June 30, 2010, for items Measured at Fair Value |
|
|
|
Pursuant to Election of the Fair Value Option |
|
|
Pursuant to Election of the Fair Value Option |
|
|
|
Unrealized Gains |
|
|
Unrealized Gains |
|
|
|
and Interest Expense |
|
|
and Interest Expense |
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
included in |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Current-Period Earnings(1) |
|
|
Current-Period Earnings(1) |
|
Medium-term notes |
|
$ |
3,602 |
|
|
$ |
2,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,602 |
|
|
$ |
2,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Changes in fair value for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2010 include interest
expense on medium-term notes of $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively. Interest expense on
medium-term notes that have been elected to be carried at fair value is recorded in interest
expense in the Consolidated Statement of (Loss) Income based on their contractual coupons. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Fair Value for the Quarter Ended |
|
|
Changes in Fair Value for the Six-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009, for items Measured at Fair Value Pursuant |
|
|
June 30, 2009, for items Measured at Fair Value Pursuant |
|
|
|
to Election of the Fair Value Option |
|
|
to Election of the Fair Value Option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Fair Value |
|
|
|
Unrealized Losses and |
|
|
Unrealized Gains and |
|
|
Unrealized (Losses) Gains |
|
|
Unrealized Gains and |
|
|
Unrealized Losses and |
|
|
Unrealized Gains (Losses) |
|
|
|
Interest Expense included |
|
|
Interest Expense included |
|
|
and Interest Expense |
|
|
Interest Expense included |
|
|
Interest Expense included |
|
|
and Interest Expense |
|
|
|
in Interest Expense |
|
|
in Interest Expense |
|
|
included in |
|
|
in Interest Expense |
|
|
in Interest Expense |
|
|
included in |
|
(In thousands) |
|
on Deposits(1) |
|
|
on Notes Payable(1) |
|
|
Current-Period Earnings(1) |
|
|
on Deposits(1) |
|
|
on Notes Payable(1) |
|
|
Current-Period Earnings(1) |
|
Callable brokered CDs |
|
$ |
(287 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(287 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,068 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2,068 |
) |
Medium-term notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,892 |
) |
|
|
(1,892 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,849 |
) |
|
|
(1,849 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(287 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,892 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,179 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,068 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,849 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,917 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Changes in fair value for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2009 include
interest expense on callable brokered CDs of $1.8 million, and $10.8 million, respectively, and
interest expense on medium-term notes of $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively. Interest
expense on callable brokered CDs and medium-term notes that have been elected to be carried at fair
value are recorded in interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of (Loss) Income based on
their contractual coupons. |
The table below presents a reconciliation for all assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the quarter and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
Total Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
(Quarter Ended June 30, 2010) |
|
|
(Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2010) |
|
Level 3 Instruments Only |
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Available For |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Available For |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Sale(2) |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Sale(2) |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
3,487 |
|
|
$ |
80,883 |
|
|
$ |
4,199 |
|
|
$ |
84,354 |
|
Total gains or (losses) (realized / unrealized): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
(440 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,970 |
|
Purchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,584 |
|
Principal repayments and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,672 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,466 |
) |
Other (1) |
|
|
(3,047 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,047 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
83,442 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
83,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts related to the valuation of interest rate cap agreements. The counterparty to these
interest rate cap agreement collapsed on April 30, 2010 and was acquired by another financial
institution through a FDIC assisted transaction. The Corporation currently has a claim with the
FDIC. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts mostly related to certain private label mortgage-backed securities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
Total Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
(Quarter Ended June 30, 2009) |
|
|
(Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2009) |
|
Level 3 Instruments Only |
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Available For |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Available For |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Derivatives(1) |
|
|
Sale(2) |
|
|
Derivatives(1) |
|
|
Sale(2) |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
982 |
|
|
$ |
110,982 |
|
|
$ |
760 |
|
|
$ |
113,983 |
|
Total gains or (losses) (realized / unrealized): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
2,532 |
|
|
|
(1,061 |
) |
|
|
2,754 |
|
|
|
(1,061 |
) |
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,372 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,244 |
) |
Principal repayments and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,981 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
3,514 |
|
|
$ |
96,568 |
|
|
$ |
3,514 |
|
|
$ |
96,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts related to the valuation of interest rate cap agreements. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts mostly related to certain private label mortgage-backed securities. |
The table below summarizes changes in unrealized gains and losses recorded in earnings for the
quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2009 for Level 3 assets and liabilities that are still
held at the end of such periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Unrealized |
|
|
Changes in Unrealized |
|
|
|
Gains (Losses) |
|
|
Gains (Losses) |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Six-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
Level 3 Instruments Only |
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Available For |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Available For |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Sale |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Sale |
|
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets still held at reporting date (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on loans |
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest income on investment securities |
|
|
2,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses on investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,061 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,061 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,532 |
|
|
$ |
(1,061 |
) |
|
$ |
2,754 |
|
|
$ |
(1,061 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unrealized losses of $2.4 million and $1.2 million on Level 3 available-for-sale securities was recognized as part of comprehensive income
for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2009. |
Additionally, fair value is used on a non-recurring basis to evaluate certain assets in
accordance with GAAP. Adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of
lower-of-cost-or-market accounting (e.g., loans held for sale carried at the lower of cost or fair
value and repossessed assets) or write-downs of individual assets (e.g., goodwill, loans).
39
As of June 30, 2010, impairment or valuation adjustments were recorded for assets
recognized at fair value on a non-recurring basis as shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Losses) gains recorded for |
|
Losses recorded for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Quarter Ended |
|
the Six-month period |
|
|
Carrying value as of June 30, 2010 |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
ended June 30, 2010 |
(In thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable (1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,443,045 |
|
|
$ |
(126,622 |
) |
|
$ |
(272,859 |
) |
Other Real Estate Owned (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,358 |
|
|
|
(7,631 |
) |
|
|
(8,669 |
) |
Loans held for sale (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mainly impaired commercial and construction loans. The impairment was generally measured
based on the fair value of the collateral. The fair values are derived from appraisals that take
into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations
but adjusted for specific characteristics and assumptions of the collateral (e.g. absorption
rates), which are not market observable. |
|
(2) |
|
The fair value is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed
transactions involving similar assets in similar locations but adjusted for specific
characteristics and assumptions of the properties (e.g. absorption rates), which are not market
observable. Losses are related to market valaution adjustments after the transfer from the loan to
the Other Real Estate Owned (OREO) portfolio. |
|
(3) |
|
Fair value is primarily derived from quotations based on the mortgage-backed securities market. |
As of June 30, 2009, impairment or valuation adjustments were recorded for assets recognized
at fair value on a non-recurring basis as shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses recorded for |
|
Losses recorded for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Quarter Ended |
|
the Six-month period |
|
|
Carrying value as of June 30, 2009 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
ended June 30, 2009 |
(In thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable (1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
759,241 |
|
|
$ |
80,146 |
|
|
$ |
117,880 |
|
Other Real Estate Owned (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,064 |
|
|
|
3,677 |
|
|
|
5,695 |
|
Core deposit intangible (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,348 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
3,988 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mainly impaired commercial and construction loans. The impairment was generally measured based
on the fair value of the collateral. The fair values are derived from appraisals that take into
consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations but
adjusted for specific characteristics and assumptions of the collateral (e.g. absorption rates),
which are not market observable. |
|
(2) |
|
The fair value is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed
transactions involving similar assets in similar locations but adjusted for specific
characteristics and assumptions of the properties (e.g. absorption rates), which are not market
observable. Losses are related to market valaution adjustments after the transfer from the loan to
the OREO portfolio. |
|
(3) |
|
Amount represents core deposit intangible of FirstBank Florida. The impairment was generally
measured based on internal information about decreases in the base of core deposits acquired upon
the acquisition of FirstBank Florida. |
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments for which
an estimated fair value is presented as well as for instruments for which the Corporation has
elected the fair value option. The estimated fair value was calculated using certain facts and
assumptions, which vary depending on the specific financial instrument.
Cash and due from banks and money market investments
The carrying amounts of cash and due from banks and money market investments are reasonable
estimates of their fair value. Money market investments include held-to-maturity U.S. Government
obligations, which have a contractual maturity of three months or less. The fair value of these
securities is based on quoted market prices in active markets that incorporate the risk of
nonperformance.
Investment securities available for sale and held to maturity
The fair value of investment securities is the market value based on quoted market prices (as
is the case with equity securities, U.S. Treasury notes and non-callable U.S. Agency debt
securities), when available, or market prices for identical or comparable assets (as is the case
with MBS and callable U.S. agency debt) that are based on observable market parameters including
benchmark yields, reported trades, quotes from brokers or dealers, issuer spreads, bids, offers and
reference data including market research operations. Observable prices in the market already
consider the risk of nonperformance. If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair value is
based upon models that use unobservable inputs due to the limited market activity of the
instrument, as is the case with certain private label mortgage-backed securities held by the
Corporation.
Private label mortgage-backed securities are collateralized by fixed-rate mortgages on
single-family residential properties in the United States and the interest rate on the securities
is variable, tied to 3-month LIBOR and limited to the weighted-average coupon
40
of the underlying collateral. The market valuation is derived from a model and represents the
estimated net cash flows over the projected life of the pool of underlying assets applying a
discount rate that reflects market observed floating spreads over LIBOR, with a widening spread
bias on a nonrated security and utilizes relevant assumptions such as prepayment rate, default
rate, and loss severity on a loan level basis. The Corporation modeled the cash flow from the
fixed-rate mortgage collateral using a static cash flow analysis according to collateral attributes
of the underlying mortgage pool (i.e. loan term, current balance, note rate, rate adjustment type,
rate adjustment frequency, rate caps, others) in combination with prepayment forecasts obtained
from a commercially available prepayment model (ADCO). The variable cash flow of the security is
modeled using the 3-month LIBOR forward curve. Loss assumptions were driven by the combination of
default and loss severity estimates, taking into account loan credit characteristics
(loan-to-value, state, origination date, property type, occupancy loan purpose, documentation type,
debt-to-income ratio, other) to provide an estimate of default and loss severity. Refer to Note 4-
Investment securities for additional information about assumptions used in the valuation of private
label MBS.
Other equity securities
Equity or other securities that do not have a readily available fair value are stated at the
net realizable value, which management believes is a reasonable proxy for their fair value. This
category is principally composed of stock that is owned by the Corporation to comply with FHLB
regulatory requirements. Their realizable value equals their cost as these shares can be freely
redeemed at par.
Loans receivable, including loans held for sale
The fair value of all loans was estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest
rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms and credit quality and with adjustments
that the Corporations management believes a market participant would consider in determining fair
value. Loans were classified by type such as commercial, residential mortgage, credit cards and
automobile. These asset categories were further segmented into fixed- and adjustable-rate
categories. The fair values of performing fixed-rate and adjustable-rate loans were calculated by
discounting expected cash flows through the estimated maturity date. Loans with no stated maturity,
like credit lines, were valued at book value. Prepayment assumptions were considered for
non-residential loans. For residential mortgage loans, prepayment estimates were based on
prepayment experiences of generic U.S. mortgage-backed securities pools with similar
characteristics (e.g. coupon and original term) and adjusted based on the Corporations historical
data. Discount rates were based on the Treasury and LIBOR/Swap Yield Curves at the date of the
analysis, and included appropriate adjustments for expected credit losses and liquidity. For
impaired collateral dependent loans, the impairment was primarily measured based on the fair value
of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in
observable transactions involving similar assets in similar locations.
Deposits
The estimated fair value of demand deposits and savings accounts, which are deposits with no
defined maturities, equals the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. For deposits with
stated maturities, but that reprice at least quarterly, the fair value is also estimated to be the
recorded amounts at the reporting date. The fair values of retail fixed-rate time deposits, with
stated maturities, are based on the present value of the future cash flows expected to be paid on
the deposits. The cash flows were based on contractual maturities; no early repayments are assumed.
Discount rates were based on the LIBOR yield curve.
The estimated fair value of total deposits excludes the fair value of core deposit
intangibles, which represent the value of the customer relationship measured by the value of demand
deposits and savings deposits that bear a low or zero rate of interest and do not fluctuate in
response to changes in interest rates.
The fair value of brokered CDs, which are included within deposits, is determined using
discounted cash flow analyses over the full term of the CDs. The valuation uses a Hull-White
Interest Rate Tree approach, an industry-standard approach for valuing instruments with interest
rate call options. The fair value of the CDs is computed using the outstanding principal amount.
The discount rates used are based on US dollar LIBOR and swap rates. At-the-money implied swaption
volatility term structure (volatility by time to maturity) is used to calibrate the model to
current market prices. The fair value does not incorporate the risk of nonperformance, since
brokered CDs are generally participated out by brokers in shares of less than $100,000 and insured
by the FDIC.
Loans payable
Loans payable consisted of short-term borrowings under the FED Discount Window Program. Due to
the short-term nature of these borrowings, their outstanding balances are estimated to be the fair
value.
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
41
Some repurchase agreements reprice at least quarterly, and their outstanding balances are
estimated to be their fair value. Where longer commitments are involved, fair value is estimated
using exit price indications of the cost of unwinding the transactions as of the end of the
reporting period. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are fully collateralized by
investment securities.
Advances from FHLB
The fair value of advances from FHLB with fixed maturities is determined using discounted cash
flow analyses over the full term of the borrowings, using indications of the fair value of similar
transactions. The cash flows assume no early repayment of the borrowings. Discount rates are based
on the LIBOR yield curve. For advances from FHLB that reprice quarterly, their outstanding balances
are estimated to be their fair value. Advances from FHLB are fully collateralized by mortgage loans
and, to a lesser extent, investment securities.
Derivative instruments
The fair value of most of the derivative instruments is based on observable market parameters
and takes into consideration the credit risk component of paying counterparties when appropriate,
except when collateral is pledged. That is, on interest rate swaps, the credit risk of both
counterparties is included in the valuation; and on options and caps, only the sellers credit risk
is considered. The Hull-White Interest Rate Tree approach is used to value the option components
of derivative instruments, and discounting of the cash flows is performed using US dollar
LIBOR-based discount rates or yield curves that account for the industry sector and the credit
rating of the counterparty and/or the Corporation. Derivatives include interest rate swaps used for
protection against rising interest rates and, prior to June 30, 2009, included interest rate swaps
to economically hedge brokered CDs and medium-term notes. For these interest rate swaps, a credit
component was not considered in the valuation since the Corporation has fully collateralized with
investment securities any mark to market loss with the counterparty and, if there were market
gains, the counterparty had to deliver collateral to the Corporation.
Certain derivatives with limited market activity, as is the case with derivative instruments
named as reference caps, were valued using models that consider unobservable market parameters
(Level 3). Reference caps were used mainly to hedge interest rate risk inherent in private label
mortgage-backed securities, thus were tied to the notional amount of the underlying fixed-rate
mortgage loans originated in the United States. The counterparty to these derivative instruments
collapsed on April 30, 2010. The Corporation currently has a claim with the FDIC and the exposure
to fair value of $3.0 million was recorded as an account receivable. In the past, significant
inputs used for the fair value determination consisted of specific characteristics such as
information used in the prepayment model which followed the amortizing schedule of the underlying
loans, which was an unobservable input. The valuation model used the Black formula, which is a
benchmark standard in the financial industry. The Black formula is similar to the Black-Scholes
formula for valuing stock options except that the spot price of the underlying is replaced by the
forward price. The Black formula uses as inputs the strike price of the cap, forward LIBOR rates,
volatility estimates and discount rates to estimate the option value. LIBOR rates and swap rates
are obtained from Bloomberg L.P. (Bloomberg) every day and are used to build a zero coupon curve
based on the Bloomberg LIBOR/Swap curve. The discount factor is then calculated from the zero
coupon curve. The cap is the sum of all caplets. For each caplet, the rate is reset at the
beginning of each reporting period and payments are made at the end of each period. The cash flow
of each caplet is then discounted from each payment date.
Although most of the derivative instruments are fully collateralized, a credit spread is
considered for those that are not secured in full. The cumulative mark-to-market effect of credit
risk in the valuation of derivative instruments resulted in an unrealized gain of approximately
$0.5 million as of June 30, 2010, which includes an immaterial unrealized loss $65,000 for the
first half of 2010.
Term notes payable
The fair value of term notes is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis over the full
term of the borrowings. This valuation also uses the Hull-White Interest Rate Tree approach to
value the option components of the term notes. The model assumes that the embedded options are
exercised economically. The fair value of medium-term notes is computed using the notional amount
outstanding. The discount rates used in the valuations are based on US dollar LIBOR and swap rates.
At-the-money implied swaption volatility term structure (volatility by time to maturity) is used to
calibrate the model to current market prices and value the cancellation option in the term notes.
For the medium-term notes, the credit risk is measured using the difference in yield curves between
swap rates and a yield curve that considers the industry and credit rating of the Corporation as
issuer of the note at a tenor comparable to the time to maturity of the note and option. The net
gain from fair value changes attributable to the Corporations own credit to the medium-term notes
for which the Corporation has elected the fair value option recorded for the first half of 2010
amounted to $2.7 million, compared to an unrealized loss of $10.1 million for the first half of
2009. The cumulative mark-to-market unrealized gain on the medium-term notes since measured at fair
value attributable to credit risk amounted to $5.3 million as of June 30, 2010.
42
Other borrowings
Other borrowings consist of junior subordinated debentures. Projected cash flows from the
debentures were discounted using the LIBOR yield curve plus a credit spread. This credit spread was
estimated using the difference in yield curves between Swap rates and a yield curve that considers
the industry and credit rating of the Corporation as issuer of the note at a tenor comparable to
the time to maturity of the debentures.
20 SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Supplemental cash flow information follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-Month Period Ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Cash paid for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on borrowings |
|
$ |
192,323 |
|
|
$ |
283,134 |
|
Income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to other real estate owned |
|
|
48,507 |
|
|
|
52,862 |
|
Additions to auto repossesion |
|
|
37,614 |
|
|
|
40,048 |
|
Capitalization of servicing assets |
|
|
3,063 |
|
|
|
3,181 |
|
Loan securitizations |
|
|
105,112 |
|
|
|
187,815 |
|
Non-cash acquisition of mortgage loans that previously served
as collateral of a commercial loan to a local financial institution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
205,395 |
|
21 SEGMENT INFORMATION
Based upon the Corporations organizational structure and the information provided to the
Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation and, to a lesser extent, the Board of Directors, the
operating segments are driven primarily by the Corporations lines of business for its operations
in Puerto Rico, the Corporations principal market, and by geographic areas for its operations
outside of Puerto Rico. As of June 30, 2010, the Corporation had six reportable segments:
Commercial and Corporate Banking; Mortgage Banking; Consumer (Retail) Banking; Treasury and
Investments; United States operations and Virgin Islands operations. Management determined the
reportable segments based on the internal reporting used to evaluate performance and to assess
where to allocate resources. Other factors such as the Corporations organizational chart, nature
of the products, distribution channels and the economic characteristics of the products were also
considered in the determination of the reportable segments.
Starting in the fourth quarter of 2009, the Corporation realigned its reporting segments to
better reflect how it views and manages its business. Two additional operating segments were
created to evaluate the operations conducted by the Corporation, outside of Puerto Rico. Operations
conducted in the United States and in the Virgin Islands are now individually evaluated as separate
operating segments. This realignment in the segment reporting essentially reflects the effect of
restructuring initiatives, including the merger of FirstBank Florida operations with and into
FirstBank, and allows the Corporation to better present the results from its growth focus.
Prior to the third quarter of 2009, the operating segments were driven primarily by the
Corporations legal entities. FirstBank operations conducted in the Virgin Islands and through its
loan production office in Miami, Florida were reflected in the Corporations then four reportable
segments (Commercial and Corporate Banking; Mortgage Banking; Consumer (Retail) Banking; Treasury
and Investments) while the operations conducted by FirstBank Florida were reported as part of a
category named Other. In the third quarter of 2009, as a result of the aforementioned merger, the
operations of FirstBank Florida were reported as part of the four reportable segments. Starting in
the first quarter of 2010, activities related to auto floor plan financings previously included as
part of Consumer (Retail) Banking are now included as part of the Commercial and Corporate Banking
segment. The changes in the fourth quarter of 2009 and first quarter of 2010 reflected a further
realignment of the organizational structure as a result of management changes. Prior period amounts
have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation. These changes did not have an
impact on the previously reported consolidated results of the Corporation.
The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment consists of the Corporations lending and other
services for large customers represented by specialized and middle-market clients and the public
sector. The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment offers commercial loans, including commercial
real estate and construction loans, and floor plan financings as well as other products such as
cash management and business management services. The Mortgage Banking segments operations consist
of the origination, sale and
43
servicing of a variety of residential mortgage loans. The Mortgage Banking segment also acquires
and sells mortgages in the secondary markets. In addition, the Mortgage Banking segment includes
mortgage loans purchased from other local banks and mortgage bankers. The Consumer (Retail) Banking
segment consists of the Corporations consumer lending and deposit taking activities conducted
mainly through its branch network and loan centers. The Treasury and Investments segment is
responsible for the Corporations investment portfolio and treasury functions executed to manage
and enhance liquidity. This segment lends funds to the Commercial and Corporate Banking, Mortgage
Banking and Consumer (Retail) Banking segments to finance their lending activities and borrows from
those segments. The Consumer (Retail) Banking segment also lends funds to other segments. The
interest rates charged or credited by Treasury and Investments and the Consumer (Retail) Banking
segments are allocated based on market rates. The difference between the allocated interest income
or expense and the Corporations actual net interest income from centralized management of funding
costs is reported in the Treasury and Investments segment. The United States operations segment
consists of all banking activities conducted by FirstBank in the United States mainland, including
commercial and retail banking services. The Virgin Islands operations segment consists of all
banking activities conducted by the Corporation in the U.S. and British Virgin Islands, including
commercial and retail banking services and insurance activities.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those referred to in Note 1 to the
Corporations financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 contained in the
Corporations Annual Report or Form 10-K.
The Corporation evaluates the performance of the segments based on net interest income, the
estimated provision for loan and lease losses, non-interest income and direct non-interest
expenses. The segments are also evaluated based on the average volume of their interest-earning
assets less the allowance for loan and lease losses.
The following table presents information about the reportable segments (in thousands):
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Commercial and |
|
|
Treasury and |
|
|
United States |
|
|
Virgin Islands |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Banking |
|
|
(Retail) Banking |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Total |
|
For the quarter ended June 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
39,634 |
|
|
$ |
47,127 |
|
|
$ |
57,691 |
|
|
$ |
39,208 |
|
|
$ |
13,308 |
|
|
|
17,896 |
|
|
$ |
214,864 |
|
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds |
|
|
(24,185 |
) |
|
|
2,681 |
|
|
|
(6,484 |
) |
|
|
27,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,549 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69,123 |
) |
|
|
(11,561 |
) |
|
|
(1,569 |
) |
|
|
(95,802 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) |
|
|
15,449 |
|
|
|
36,259 |
|
|
|
51,207 |
|
|
|
(1,927 |
) |
|
|
1,747 |
|
|
|
16,327 |
|
|
|
119,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
(29,424 |
) |
|
|
(10,923 |
) |
|
|
(71,651 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,611 |
) |
|
|
(1,184 |
) |
|
|
(146,793 |
) |
Non-interest income |
|
|
2,166 |
|
|
|
7,461 |
|
|
|
3,003 |
|
|
|
24,288 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
2,446 |
|
|
|
39,525 |
|
Direct non-interest expenses |
|
|
(10,193 |
) |
|
|
(25,151 |
) |
|
|
(19,576 |
) |
|
|
(1,413 |
) |
|
|
(12,692 |
) |
|
|
(10,500 |
) |
|
|
(79,525 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment (loss) income |
|
$ |
(22,002 |
) |
|
$ |
7,646 |
|
|
$ |
(37,017 |
) |
|
$ |
20,948 |
|
|
$ |
(44,395 |
) |
|
$ |
7,089 |
|
|
$ |
(67,731 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
earnings (loss) assets |
|
$ |
2,714,807 |
|
|
$ |
1,625,859 |
|
|
$ |
6,001,446 |
|
|
$ |
5,428,208 |
|
|
$ |
1,148,631 |
|
|
$ |
1,031,373 |
|
|
$ |
17,950,324 |
|
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Commercial and |
|
|
Treasury and |
|
|
United States |
|
|
Virgin Islands |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking |
|
|
(Retail) Banking |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Total |
|
For the quarter ended June 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
37,289 |
|
|
$ |
50,113 |
|
|
$ |
64,414 |
|
|
$ |
66,491 |
|
|
$ |
16,947 |
|
|
|
17,526 |
|
|
$ |
252,780 |
|
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds |
|
|
(26,864 |
) |
|
|
(552 |
) |
|
|
(18,142 |
) |
|
|
45,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,706 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84,616 |
) |
|
|
(18,802 |
) |
|
|
(2,642 |
) |
|
|
(121,766 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) |
|
|
10,425 |
|
|
|
33,855 |
|
|
|
46,272 |
|
|
|
27,433 |
|
|
|
(1,855 |
) |
|
|
14,884 |
|
|
|
131,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
(12,912 |
) |
|
|
(11,594 |
) |
|
|
(116,738 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85,715 |
) |
|
|
(8,193 |
) |
|
|
(235,152 |
) |
Non-interest income |
|
|
2,294 |
|
|
|
7,948 |
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
8,365 |
|
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
2,456 |
|
|
|
23,415 |
|
Direct non-interest expenses |
|
|
(8,701 |
) |
|
|
(24,101 |
) |
|
|
(13,159 |
) |
|
|
(1,990 |
) |
|
|
(10,793 |
) |
|
|
(12,122 |
) |
|
|
(70,866 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment (loss) income |
|
$ |
(8,894 |
) |
|
$ |
6,108 |
|
|
$ |
(82,379 |
) |
|
$ |
33,808 |
|
|
$ |
(97,257 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,975 |
) |
|
$ |
(151,589 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average earnings assets |
|
$ |
2,554,381 |
|
|
$ |
1,792,475 |
|
|
$ |
6,460,666 |
|
|
$ |
6,015,421 |
|
|
$ |
1,509,517 |
|
|
$ |
986,728 |
|
|
$ |
19,319,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Commercial and |
|
|
Treasury and |
|
|
United States |
|
|
Virgin Islands |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking |
|
|
(Retail) Banking |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Total |
|
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
79,660 |
|
|
$ |
94,689 |
|
|
$ |
116,533 |
|
|
$ |
81,982 |
|
|
$ |
27,238 |
|
|
$ |
35,750 |
|
|
$ |
435,852 |
|
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds |
|
|
(49,512 |
) |
|
|
4,821 |
|
|
|
(13,310 |
) |
|
|
58,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(146,863 |
) |
|
|
(22,828 |
) |
|
|
(3,119 |
) |
|
|
(199,927 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) |
|
|
30,148 |
|
|
|
72,393 |
|
|
|
103,223 |
|
|
|
(6,880 |
) |
|
|
4,410 |
|
|
|
32,631 |
|
|
|
235,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
(45,438 |
) |
|
|
(23,416 |
) |
|
|
(131,099 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104,813 |
) |
|
|
(12,992 |
) |
|
|
(317,758 |
) |
Non-interest income |
|
|
4,417 |
|
|
|
14,768 |
|
|
|
4,605 |
|
|
|
54,873 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
5,873 |
|
|
|
84,851 |
|
Direct non-interest expenses |
|
|
(18,288 |
) |
|
|
(49,151 |
) |
|
|
(37,162 |
) |
|
|
(3,025 |
) |
|
|
(22,009 |
) |
|
|
(21,509 |
) |
|
|
(151,144 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment (loss) income |
|
$ |
(29,161 |
) |
|
$ |
14,594 |
|
|
$ |
(60,433 |
) |
|
$ |
44,968 |
|
|
$ |
(122,097 |
) |
|
$ |
4,003 |
|
|
$ |
(148,126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average earnings assets |
|
$ |
2,712,067 |
|
|
$ |
1,646,337 |
|
|
$ |
6,225,334 |
|
|
$ |
5,447,358 |
|
|
$ |
1,204,921 |
|
|
$ |
1,036,541 |
|
|
$ |
18,272,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Commercial and |
|
|
Treasury and |
|
|
United States |
|
|
Virgin Islands |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking |
|
|
(Retail) Banking |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Total |
|
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
76,768 |
|
|
$ |
101,482 |
|
|
$ |
125,071 |
|
|
$ |
136,248 |
|
|
$ |
36,249 |
|
|
|
35,285 |
|
|
$ |
511,103 |
|
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds |
|
|
(55,995 |
) |
|
|
(1,883 |
) |
|
|
(44,438 |
) |
|
|
102,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,718 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188,388 |
) |
|
|
(32,673 |
) |
|
|
(5,712 |
) |
|
|
(258,491 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
20,773 |
|
|
|
67,881 |
|
|
|
80,633 |
|
|
|
50,176 |
|
|
|
3,576 |
|
|
|
29,573 |
|
|
|
252,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
(20,929 |
) |
|
|
(14,644 |
) |
|
|
(143,931 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,780 |
) |
|
|
(14,297 |
) |
|
|
(294,581 |
) |
Non-interest income |
|
|
3,157 |
|
|
|
15,779 |
|
|
|
2,492 |
|
|
|
25,887 |
|
|
|
1,218 |
|
|
|
4,935 |
|
|
|
53,468 |
|
Direct non-interest expenses |
|
|
(15,730 |
) |
|
|
(47,773 |
) |
|
|
(21,897 |
) |
|
|
(3,712 |
) |
|
|
(22,015 |
) |
|
|
(23,631 |
) |
|
|
(134,758 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment (loss) income |
|
$ |
(12,729 |
) |
|
$ |
21,243 |
|
|
$ |
(82,703 |
) |
|
$ |
72,351 |
|
|
$ |
(118,001 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,420 |
) |
|
$ |
(123,259 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average earnings assets |
|
$ |
2,589,961 |
|
|
$ |
1,811,678 |
|
|
$ |
6,275,378 |
|
|
$ |
5,788,347 |
|
|
$ |
1,499,170 |
|
|
$ |
989,771 |
|
|
|
18,954,305 |
|
45
The following table presents a reconciliation of the reportable segment financial
information to the consolidated totals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Six-month Period Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss for segments |
|
$ |
(67,731 |
) |
|
$ |
(151,589 |
) |
|
$ |
(148,126 |
) |
|
$ |
(123,259 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(19,086 |
) |
|
|
(25,122 |
) |
|
|
(38,829 |
) |
|
|
(45,758 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
(86,817 |
) |
|
|
(176,711 |
) |
|
|
(186,955 |
) |
|
|
(169,017 |
) |
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(3,823 |
) |
|
|
98,053 |
|
|
|
(10,684 |
) |
|
|
112,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated net loss |
|
$ |
(90,640 |
) |
|
$ |
(78,658 |
) |
|
$ |
(197,639 |
) |
|
$ |
(56,767 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average earning assets for segments |
|
$ |
17,950,324 |
|
|
$ |
19,319,188 |
|
|
$ |
18,272,558 |
|
|
$ |
18,954,305 |
|
Average non-earning assets |
|
|
770,618 |
|
|
|
741,908 |
|
|
|
745,439 |
|
|
|
731,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated average assets |
|
$ |
18,720,942 |
|
|
$ |
20,061,096 |
|
|
$ |
19,017,997 |
|
|
$ |
19,685,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Corporation enters into financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal
course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments may
include commitments to extend credit and commitments to sell mortgage loans at fair value. As of
June 30, 2010, commitments to extend credit amounted to approximately $1.1 billion and standby
letters of credit amounted to approximately $81.8 million. Commitments to extend credit are
agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any conditions established in
the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. For
most of the commercial lines of credit, the Corporation has the option to reevaluate the agreement
prior to additional disbursements. In the case of credit cards and personal lines of credit, the
Corporation can cancel the unused credit facility at any time and without cause. Generally, the
Corporations mortgage banking activities do not enter into interest rate lock agreements with
prospective borrowers.
Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. (Lehman) was the counterparty to the Corporation on
certain interest rate swap agreements. During the third quarter of 2008, Lehman failed to pay the
scheduled net cash settlement due to the Corporation, which constitutes an event of default under
those interest rate swap agreements. The Corporation terminated all interest rate swaps with Lehman
and replaced them with other counterparties under similar terms and conditions. In connection with
the unpaid net cash settlement due as of June 30, 2010 under the swap agreements, the Corporation
has an unsecured counterparty exposure with Lehman, which filed for bankruptcy on October 3, 2008,
of approximately $1.4 million. This exposure was reserved in the third quarter of 2008. The
Corporation had pledged collateral of $63.6 million with Lehman to guarantee its performance under
the swap agreements in the event payment thereunder was required. The book value of pledged
securities with Lehman as of June 30, 2010 amounted to approximately $64.5 million.
The Corporation believes that the securities pledged as collateral should not be part of the
Lehman bankruptcy estate given the fact that the posted collateral constituted a performance
guarantee under the swap agreements and, was not part of a financing agreement, and ownership of
the securities was never transferred to Lehman. Upon termination of the interest rate swap
agreements, Lehmans obligation was to return the collateral to the Corporation. During the fourth
quarter of 2009, the Corporation discovered that Lehman Brothers, Inc., acting as agent of Lehman,
had deposited the securities in a custodial account at JP Morgan/ Chase, and that, shortly before
the filing of the Lehman bankruptcy proceedings, it had provided instructions to have most of the
securities transferred to Barclays Capital in New York. After Barclays refusal to turn over the
securities, the Corporation, during the month of December 2009, filed a lawsuit against Barclays
Capital in federal court in New York demanding the return of the securities.
During the month of February 2010, Barclays filed a motion with the court requesting that the
Corporations claim be dismissed on the grounds that the allegations of the complaint are not
sufficient to justify the granting of the remedies therein sought. Shortly thereafter, the
Corporation filed its opposition motion. A hearing on the motions was held in court on April 28,
2010. The court on that date, after hearing the arguments by both sides, concluded that the
Corporations equitable-based causes of action, upon which the return of the investment securities
is being demanded, contain allegations that sufficiently plead facts warranting the denial of
Barclays motion to dismiss the Corporations claim. Accordingly, the judge ordered the case to
proceed to trial. The scheduling conference that had been set for
August 26, 2010, for purposes of having the parties agree on a
timetable for discovery has been temporarily suspended. The judge
decided to order the parties to submit to a mediation process prior
to a scheduling conference. While there have been preliminary
telephonic conversations with the appointed mediator, no formal
mediation sessions have been held. It is expected that within the
next 30 days the mediator will notice dated for mediation sessions. While the Corporation believes it has valid
reasons to support its claim for the return of the securities, no assurances can be given that it
will ultimately succeed in its litigation against Barclays Capital to recover all or a substantial
portion of the securities.
Additionally, the Corporation continues to pursue its claim filed in January 2009 in the
proceedings under the Securities Protection Act with regard to Lehman Brothers Incorporated in
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York. An estimated loss
46
was not accrued as the Corporation is unable to determine the timing of the claim resolution or
whether it will succeed in recovering all or a substantial portion of the collateral or its
equivalent value. If additional relevant negative facts become available in future periods, a need
to recognize a partial or full reserve of this claim may arise. Considering that the investment
securities have not yet been recovered by the Corporation, despite its efforts in this regard, the
Corporation decided to classify such investments as non-performing during the second quarter of
2009.
As of June 30, 2010, First BanCorp and its subsidiaries were defendants in various legal
proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes that the final
disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Corporations financial
position or results of operations.
23 FIRST BANCORP (Holding Company Only) Financial Information
The following condensed financial information presents the financial position of the Holding
Company only as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and the results of its operations for the
quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
52,270 |
|
|
$ |
55,423 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
Investment securities available for sale, at market: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investments |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
Other investment securities |
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
1,550 |
|
Investment in FirstBank Puerto Rico, at equity |
|
|
1,595,912 |
|
|
|
1,754,217 |
|
Investment in FirstBank Insurance Agency, at equity |
|
|
6,345 |
|
|
|
6,709 |
|
Investment in PR Finance, at equity |
|
|
3,209 |
|
|
|
3,036 |
|
Investment in FBP Statutory Trust I |
|
|
3,093 |
|
|
|
3,093 |
|
Investment in FBP Statutory Trust II |
|
|
3,866 |
|
|
|
3,866 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
4,653 |
|
|
|
3,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,671,052 |
|
|
$ |
1,831,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities & Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other borrowings |
|
$ |
231,959 |
|
|
$ |
231,959 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
232,763 |
|
|
|
232,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
1,438,289 |
|
|
|
1,599,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities & Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
1,671,052 |
|
|
$ |
1,831,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Six-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on other investments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Dividends from FirstBank Puerto Rico |
|
|
771 |
|
|
|
24,962 |
|
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
44,939 |
|
Other income |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
25,031 |
|
|
|
1,623 |
|
|
|
45,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and other borrowings |
|
|
1,697 |
|
|
|
2,291 |
|
|
|
3,369 |
|
|
|
4,729 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
821 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
1,510 |
|
|
|
1,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,518 |
|
|
|
3,042 |
|
|
|
4,879 |
|
|
|
5,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss on investments and impairments |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(603 |
) |
|
|
(388 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes and equity
in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries |
|
|
(1,699 |
) |
|
|
21,989 |
|
|
|
(3,859 |
) |
|
|
38,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
(88,941 |
) |
|
|
(100,636 |
) |
|
|
(193,780 |
) |
|
|
(95,566 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(90,640 |
) |
|
$ |
(78,658 |
) |
|
$ |
(197,639 |
) |
|
$ |
(56,767 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On July 7, 2010, First BanCorp (the Corporation) entered into an Exchange Agreement (the
Exchange Agreement) with the United States Department of the Treasury (the Treasury) pursuant
to which the Treasury agreed, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain closing conditions,
to exchange all 400,000 shares of the Corporations Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred
Stock, Series F, with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share (the Series F Preferred
Stock), beneficially owned and held by the Treasury, for 400,000 shares of a new series of
preferred stock, the Series G Preferred Stock, with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share,
plus additional shares of Series G Preferred Stock having a value equal to the accrued and unpaid
dividends on the Series F Preferred Stock. The Corporation subsequently completed the transaction
with the U.S. Treasury by issuing 424,174 shares of Series G Mandatorily Convertible Preferred
Stock to the U.S. Treasury in exchange for the Series F preferred stock it previously held. The
Series G preferred stock is convertible into approximately 380.2 million shares of the
Corporations common stock, based upon the initial conversion price, by the Corporation upon the
satisfaction of certain conditions and by the U.S. Treasury and any subsequent holder at any time
and, unless earlier converted, is automatically convertible into common stock on the seventh
anniversary of the issuance of the Series G Preferred Stock at the then current market price of the
common stock.
On July 16, 2010, the Corporation commenced an offer to exchange up to 256,401,610 newly
issued shares of the Corporations common stock, par value $1.00 per share, for any and all of the
issued and outstanding shares of Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series A
through E.
The Company has performed an evaluation of all other events occurring subsequent to June 30,
2010, management has determined that there are no additional events occurring in this period that
required disclosure in or adjustment to the accompanying financial statements.
48
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (MD&A)
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(In thousands, except for per share and financial ratios)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
Six-month period ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Condensed Income Statements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
214,864 |
|
|
$ |
252,780 |
|
|
$ |
435,852 |
|
|
$ |
511,103 |
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
95,802 |
|
|
|
121,766 |
|
|
|
199,927 |
|
|
|
258,491 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
119,062 |
|
|
|
131,014 |
|
|
|
235,925 |
|
|
|
252,612 |
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
146,793 |
|
|
|
235,152 |
|
|
|
317,758 |
|
|
|
294,581 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
39,525 |
|
|
|
23,415 |
|
|
|
84,851 |
|
|
|
53,468 |
|
Non-interest expenses |
|
|
98,611 |
|
|
|
95,988 |
|
|
|
189,973 |
|
|
|
180,516 |
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(86,817 |
) |
|
|
(176,711 |
) |
|
|
(186,955 |
) |
|
|
(169,017 |
) |
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(3,823 |
) |
|
|
98,053 |
|
|
|
(10,684 |
) |
|
|
112,250 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
(90,640 |
) |
|
|
(78,658 |
) |
|
|
(197,639 |
) |
|
|
(56,767 |
) |
Net loss attributable to common stockholders |
|
|
(96,810 |
) |
|
|
(94,825 |
) |
|
|
(209,961 |
) |
|
|
(88,052 |
) |
Per Common Share Results: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share basic |
|
$ |
(1.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.27 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.95 |
) |
Net loss per share diluted |
|
$ |
(1.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.27 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.95 |
) |
Cash dividends declared |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
Average shares outstanding |
|
|
92,521 |
|
|
|
92,511 |
|
|
|
92,521 |
|
|
|
92,511 |
|
Average shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
92,521 |
|
|
|
92,511 |
|
|
|
92,521 |
|
|
|
92,511 |
|
Book value per common share |
|
$ |
5.48 |
|
|
$ |
9.88 |
|
|
$ |
5.48 |
|
|
$ |
9.88 |
|
Tangible book value per common share (1) |
|
$ |
5.01 |
|
|
$ |
9.38 |
|
|
$ |
5.01 |
|
|
$ |
9.38 |
|
Selected Financial Ratios (In Percent): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profitability: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Average Assets |
|
|
(1.94 |
) |
|
|
(1.57 |
) |
|
|
(2.10 |
) |
|
|
(0.58 |
) |
Interest Rate Spread (2) |
|
|
2.38 |
|
|
|
2.60 |
|
|
|
2.41 |
|
|
|
2.53 |
|
Net Interest Margin (2) |
|
|
2.66 |
|
|
|
2.92 |
|
|
|
2.70 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
|
Return on Average Total Equity |
|
|
(24.52 |
) |
|
|
(15.93 |
) |
|
|
(25.85 |
) |
|
|
(5.89 |
) |
Return on Average Common Equity |
|
|
(70.31 |
) |
|
|
(36.14 |
) |
|
|
(69.13 |
) |
|
|
(16.99 |
) |
Average Total Equity to Average Total Assets |
|
|
7.92 |
|
|
|
9.85 |
|
|
|
8.11 |
|
|
|
9.79 |
|
Tangible common equity ratio (1) |
|
|
2.57 |
|
|
|
4.35 |
|
|
|
2.57 |
|
|
|
4.35 |
|
Dividend payout ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.84 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.73 |
) |
Efficiency ratio (3) |
|
|
62.18 |
|
|
|
62.16 |
|
|
|
59.22 |
|
|
|
58.98 |
|
Asset Quality: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to loans receivable |
|
|
4.83 |
|
|
|
3.11 |
|
|
|
4.83 |
|
|
|
3.11 |
|
Net charge-offs (annualized) to average loans |
|
|
3.62 |
|
|
|
3.85 |
|
|
|
3.63 |
|
|
|
2.52 |
|
Provision for loan and lease losses to net charge-offs |
|
|
124.62 |
|
|
|
180.97 |
|
|
|
131.54 |
|
|
|
174.97 |
|
Non-performing assets to total assets |
|
|
9.39 |
|
|
|
6.53 |
|
|
|
9.39 |
|
|
|
6.53 |
|
Non-accruing loans to total loans receivable |
|
|
12.40 |
|
|
|
8.94 |
|
|
|
12.40 |
|
|
|
8.94 |
|
Allowance to total non-accruing loans |
|
|
38.97 |
|
|
|
34.81 |
|
|
|
38.97 |
|
|
|
34.81 |
|
Allowance to total non-accruing loans
excluding residential real estate loans |
|
|
54.81 |
|
|
|
52.85 |
|
|
|
54.81 |
|
|
|
52.85 |
|
Other Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Price: End of period |
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
$ |
3.95 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
$ |
3.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
As of |
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and loans held for sale |
|
$ |
12,603,738 |
|
|
$ |
13,949,226 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
604,304 |
|
|
|
528,120 |
|
Money market and investment securities |
|
|
4,580,099 |
|
|
|
4,866,617 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
43,401 |
|
|
|
44,698 |
|
Deferred tax asset, net |
|
|
97,155 |
|
|
|
109,197 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
18,116,023 |
|
|
|
19,628,448 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
12,727,575 |
|
|
|
12,669,047 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
3,780,896 |
|
|
|
5,214,147 |
|
Total preferred equity |
|
|
930,830 |
|
|
|
928,508 |
|
Total common equity |
|
|
444,148 |
|
|
|
644,062 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
|
63,311 |
|
|
|
26,493 |
|
Total equity |
|
|
1,438,289 |
|
|
|
1,599,063 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Non-gaap measure. Refer to Capital discussion below for additional
information about the components and reconciliation of these measures. |
|
(2) |
|
On a tax-equivalent basis and excluding the changes in fair value of
derivative instruments and financial liabilities measured at fair value (see
Net Interest Income discussion below for a reconciliation of this non-gaap
measure). |
|
(3) |
|
Non-interest expenses to the sum of net interest income and non-interest
income. The denominator includes non recurring income and changes in the fair
value of derivative instruments and financial instruments measured at fair value. |
49
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations relates to the accompanying consolidated unaudited financial statements of First BanCorp
(the Corporation or First BanCorp) and should be read in conjunction with the interim unaudited
financial statements and the notes thereto.
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
First BanCorp is a diversified financial holding company headquartered in San Juan, Puerto
Rico offering a full range of financial products to consumers and commercial customers through
various subsidiaries. First BanCorp is the holding company of FirstBank Puerto Rico (FirstBank or
the Bank) and FirstBank Insurance Agency. Through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, the Corporation
operates offices in Puerto Rico, the United States and British Virgin Islands and the State of
Florida (USA) specializing in commercial banking, residential mortgage loan originations, finance
leases, personal loans, small loans, auto loans, insurance agency and broker-dealer activities.
Effective June 2, 2010, FirstBank, by and through its Board of Directors, entered into a
Consent Order with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Office of the
Commissioner of Financial Institutions of Puerto Rico (the Order), a copy of which is attached as
Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K filed by the Corporation on June 4, 2010. This Order provides for
various things, including (among other things) the following: (1) within 30 days of entering into
the Order, the development by FirstBank of a capital plan to achieve over time a leverage ratio of
at least 8%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 10% and a total risk-based capital ratio
of at least 12%, (2) the preparation by FirstBank of strategic, liquidity and earnings plans and
related projections within certain timetables set forth in the Order and on an ongoing basis, (3)
the preparation by FirstBank of plans for reducing criticized assets and delinquent loans within
timeframes set forth in the Order, (4) the requirement for First Bank board approval prior to the
extension of credit to classified borrowers, (5) certain limitations with respect to brokered
deposits, including the need for pre-approval by the FDIC of the issuance of brokered deposits, (6)
the establishment by FirstBank of a comprehensive policy and methodology for determining the
allowance for loan and lease losses and the review and revision of loan policies, including the
non-accrual policy, and (7) the operation by FirstBank under adequate and effective programs of
independent loan review and appraisal compliance and under an effective policy for managing
sensitivity to interest rate risk. The foregoing summary is not complete and is qualified in all
respects by reference to the actual language of the Order. Although all the regulatory capital
ratios exceeded the established well capitalized levels at June 30, 2010, because of the Order
with the FDIC, FirstBank cannot be treated as a well capitalized institution under regulatory
guidance.
Effective June 3, 2010, First BanCorp entered into a written agreement (the Agreement and
collectively with the Order the Agreements) with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (FED), a
copy of which is attached as Exhibit 10.2 of the Form 8-K filed by the Corporation on June 4, 2010.
The Agreement provides, among other things, that the holding company must serve as a source of
strength to FirstBank, and that, except upon consent of the FED, the holding company may not pay
dividends to stockholders or receive dividends from FirstBank, the holding company and its nonbank
subsidiaries may not make payments on trust preferred securities or subordinated debt, and the
holding company cannot incur, increase or guarantee debt or repurchase any capital securities. The
Agreement also requires that the holding company submit a capital plan that reflects sufficient
capital, which must be acceptable to the FED, and follow certain guidelines with respect to the
appointment or change in responsibilities of senior officers. The foregoing summary is not complete
and is qualified in all respects by reference to the actual language of the Agreement.
As discussed in Item 1, Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Corporation has
assessed its ability to continue as a going concern and has concluded that, based on current and
expected liquidity needs and sources, management expects the Corporation to be able to meet its
obligations for a reasonable period of time. The Corporation has $3.5 billion of brokered CDs
maturing within twelve months from June 30, 2010. Management believes it will continue to obtain
waivers from the restrictions to issue brokered CDs under the Order to meet its obligations and
execute its business plans. If unanticipated market factors emerge, or if the Corporation is
unable to raise additional capital or complete the identified alternative capital preservation
initiatives, successfully execute its plans, or comply with the Order, its banking regulators could
take further action, which could include actions that may have a material adverse effect on the
Corporations business, results of operations and financial position. Also see Liquidity and
Capital Adequacy.
OVERVIEW OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
First BanCorps results of operations generally depend primarily upon its net interest income,
which is the difference between the interest income earned on its interest-earning assets,
including investment securities and loans, and the interest expense incurred on its
interest-bearing liabilities, including deposits and borrowings. Net interest income is affected by
various factors, including: the interest rate scenario; the volumes, mix and composition of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities; and the re-pricing characteristics of
these assets and liabilities. The Corporations results of operations also depend on the provision
for loan and lease losses, which significantly affected the results for the quarter ended
June 30, 2010, non-interest expenses (such as personnel,
occupancy, insurance premiums and other costs), non-interest income (mainly service charges
and fees on loans and deposits and
50
insurance income), the results of its hedging activities, gains
(losses) on sales of investments, gains (losses) on mortgage banking activities, and income taxes.
Net loss for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 amounted to $90.6 million or $1.05 per diluted
common share, compared to net loss of $78.7 million or $1.03 per diluted common share for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009. The Corporations financial results for the second quarter of 2010,
as compared to the second quarter of 2009, were principally impacted by (i) a decrease of $101.9
million in income tax benefit, affected by a non-cash increase of $45.1 million in the
Corporations deferred tax asset valuation allowance as most of the deferred tax assets created in
2010 were fully reserved, (ii) a decrease of $12.0 million in net interest income mainly resulting
from the Corporations strategy to deleverage its balance sheet to preserve its capital position
and from higher than historical levels of liquidity invested in overnight funding in 2010, and
(iii) an increase of $2.6 million in non-interest expenses that was driven by an increase in losses
on real estate owned (REO) operations, mainly due to write-downs to the value of repossessed
properties, and by charges to the reserve for probable losses on outstanding unfunded loan
commitments. These factors were partially offset by (i) a reduction of $88.4 million in the
provision for loan and lease losses related to a slower migration of loans to non-performing and/or
impaired status, reduced net charge-offs and loan portfolio deleverage, (ii) higher gains on sale
of investment securities, mainly U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities, and (iii) reductions in
certain expenses categories, including employees compensation, occupancy and business promotion
expenses.
The key drivers of the Corporations financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2010
include the following:
|
|
|
Net interest income for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 was $119.1 million, compared to
$131.0 million for the same period in 2009. The decrease is mainly associated with the
deleveraging of the Corporations balance sheet to preserve its
capital position including sales
of approximately $2.2 billion of investment securities over the last 12 months, mainly U.S.
agency MBS, and loan repayments, in particular, repayments of credit facilities extended to
the Puerto Rico Government. Net interest income was also affected by compressions in net
interest margin, which on an adjusted tax-equivalent basis decreased to 2.66% for the
second quarter of 2010 from 2.92% for the same period in 2009, mainly due to lower yields
on investments and the adverse impact of maintaining higher than historical liquidity
levels. Approximately $969 million in investment securities were called over the last
twelve months and were replaced with lower yielding U.S. agency investment securities.
These factors were partially offset by the favorable impact of lower deposit pricing and
the strong core deposit growth. Refer to the Net Interest Income discussion below for
additional information. |
|
|
|
|
For the second quarter of 2010, the Corporations provision for loan and lease losses
amounted to $146.8 million, compared to $235.2 million for the same period in 2009. Refer
to the discussion under Risk Management below for an analysis of the allowance for loan
and lease losses and non-performing assets and related ratios. The decrease in the
provision for 2010 was primarily due to a slower migration of loans to non-performing
and/or impaired status, as well as decreases in charge-offs and the overall reduction of
the loan portfolio. Much of the decrease in the provision is related to the construction
loan portfolio in both the Puerto Rico and Florida market. |
|
|
|
|
The Corporations net charge-offs for the second quarter of 2010 were $117.8 million or
3.62% of average loans on an annualized basis, compared to $129.9 million or 3.85% of
average loans on an annualized basis for the same period in 2009, a reduction mainly
related to the construction loan portfolio. Refer to the Provision for Loan and Lease
Losses and Risk Management Non-performing assets and Allowance for Loan and Lease
Losses sections below for additional information. |
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ended June 30, 2010, the Corporations non-interest income amounted to
$39.5 million, compared to $23.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The increase
was mainly due to an increase of $13.9 million on realized gains on the sale of investment
securities (mainly U.S. agency MBS), and commissions of $1.3 million related to the
Corporations broker-dealer businesses. Refer to the Non Interest Income discussion
below for additional information. |
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expenses for the second quarter of 2010 amounted to $98.6 million, compared
to $96.0 million for the same period in 2009. The increase is mainly related to an
increase of $4.2 million in losses on REO operations, driven by write-downs and losses on
the sale of repossessed properties, a $3.6 million charge to the reserve for probable
losses on outstanding unfunded loan commitments, and a $2.3 million increase in
professional fees attributed in part to higher legal fees related to collections and
foreclosure procedures and mortgage appraisals. This was partially offset by a decrease of
$3.5 million in employees compensation and the impact in 2009 of a non-recurring $2.6
million charge to property tax expense attributable to the reassessed value of certain
properties. Refer to the Non Interest Expenses discussion below for additional
information. |
|
|
|
|
For the second quarter of 2010, the Corporation recorded an income tax expense of $3.8
million, compared to an income tax benefit of $98.1 million for the same period in 2009.
The variance is mainly due to increases in the valuation allowance against deferred tax
asset as most of the deferred tax assets created in 2010 was fully reserved. Refer to the
Income Taxes discussion below for additional information. |
51
|
|
|
Total assets as of June 30, 2010 amounted to $18.1 billion, a decrease of $1.5 billion
compared to total assets as of December 31, 2009. The decrease in total assets was
primarily a result of a net decrease of $1.4 billion in the loan portfolio largely
attributable to repayments on credit facilities extended to the Puerto Rico government
and/or political subdivisions coupled with charge-offs, the sale of non-performing loans
and a higher allowance for loan and lease losses. The decrease in assets is consistent
with the Corporations decision to deleverage its balance sheet to preserve its capital
position. Refer to the Financial Condition and Operating Data discussion below for
additional information. |
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010, total liabilities amounted to $16.7 billion, a decrease of
approximately $1.4 billion, as compared to $18.0 billion as of December 31, 2009. The
decrease in total liabilities is mainly attributable to a decrease of $900 million in
advances from the FED, a $492.2 million reduction in repurchase agreements, mainly maturing
short-term repurchase agreements, and a decrease of $455.6 million in brokered certificates
of deposit (CDs). This was partially offset by an increase of $514.1 million in total
non-brokered deposits, mainly core deposits in Florida. Refer to the Risk Management
Liquidity and Capital Adequacy discussion below for additional information about the
Corporations funding sources. |
|
|
|
|
The Corporations stockholders equity amounted to $1.4 billion as of June 30, 2010, a
decrease of $160.8 million compared to the balance as of December 31, 2009, driven by the
net loss of $197.6 million for the first half of 2010, partially offset by an increase of
$36.8 million in accumulated other comprehensive income. As previously reported, the
Corporation decided to suspend the payment of common and preferred dividends, effective
with the preferred dividend due for the month of August 2009. As of June 30, 2010, all
regulatory capital ratios exceeded the established well-capitalized minimums but, as a
result of the Order, FirstBank is considered to be only adequately
capitalized based on the definitions on FDIC regulations. Refer to
the Risk Management Capital section below for additional information, including
information about strategies to increase the Corporations common equity. |
|
|
|
|
Total loan production, including purchases, refinancings and draws from existing
commitments, for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 was $651 million, compared to $900.4
million for the comparable period in 2009. The decrease in loan production during 2010, as
compared to the second quarter of 2009, was reflected in all major loan categories with the
exception of auto financing. |
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual loans as of June 30, 2010 were $1.55 billion, compared to $1.56
billion as of December 31, 2009. The decrease of $13.2 million, or 0.84%, in non-accrual
loans from December 31, 2009 was led by decreases in construction and commercial and
industrial (C&I) loans. Total non-accrual construction loans decreased $12.9 million, or
2%, from December 31, 2009 mainly in connection with charge-offs and the sale of a $52
million loan in Florida. Non-accrual C&I loans decreased by $8.1 million, or 3%, from the
end of the year 2009 driven by charge-offs and, to a lesser extent, to loans restored to
accrual status based on their compliance with modified terms, in the case of restructured
loans, or on their having been brought current and repayment of principal and interest is
expected by the Corporation. Non-accrual residential mortgage loans increased by $6.4
million mainly in Puerto Rico, which was negatively impacted by the continued trend of
higher unemployment rates affecting consumers, partially offset by a decrease in the
Florida portfolio. Non-accrual commercial mortgage loans increased by $3.5 million, mainly
in Puerto Rico partially offset by charge-offs. The levels of non-accrual consumer
loans, including finance leases, remained stable showing a $2.1 million decrease during the
first half of 2010. Refer to the Risk Management Non-accruing and Non-performing
Assets section below for additional information. |
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PRACTICES
The accounting principles of the Corporation and the methods of applying these principles
conform with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP). The
Corporations critical accounting policies relate to the 1) allowance for loan and lease losses;
2) other-than-temporary impairments; 3) income taxes; 4) classification and related values of
investment securities; 5) valuation of financial instruments; and 6) income recognition on loans.
These critical accounting policies involve judgments, estimates and assumptions made by management
that affect the amounts recorded for assets and liabilities and for contingent liabilities as of
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from estimates, if different assumptions or
conditions prevail. Certain determinations inherently require greater reliance on the use of
estimates, assumptions, and judgments and, as such, have a greater possibility of producing results
that could be materially different than those originally reported.
The Corporations critical accounting policies are described in Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in First BanCorps 2009 Annual
Report on Form 10-K. There have not been any material changes in the Corporations critical
accounting policies since December 31, 2009.
52
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Interest Income
Net interest income is the excess of interest earned by First BanCorp on its interest-earning
assets over the interest incurred on its interest-bearing liabilities. First BanCorps net interest
income is subject to interest rate risk due to the re-pricing and maturity mismatch of the
Corporations assets and liabilities. Net interest income for the quarter and six-month period
ended June 30, 2010 was $119.1 million and $235.9 million, respectively, compared to $131.0 million
and $252.6 million for the comparable periods in 2009. On a tax-equivalent basis and excluding the
changes in the fair value of derivative instruments and unrealized gains and losses on liabilities
measured at fair value, net interest income for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30,
2010 was $122.9 million and $251.4 million, respectively, compared to $142.6 million and $275.0
million for the comparable periods of 2009.
The following tables include a detailed analysis of net interest income. Part I presents
average volumes and rates on an adjusted tax-equivalent basis and Part II presents, also on an
adjusted tax-equivalent basis, the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in volume
of interest-related assets and liabilities have affected the Corporations net interest income. For
each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided
on changes attributable to (i) changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior period
rates), and (ii) changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior period volumes). Rate-volume
variances (changes in rate multiplied by changes in volume) have been allocated to the changes in
volume and rate based upon their respective percentage of the combined totals.
The net interest income is computed on a tax-equivalent basis (for definition and
reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure, refer to discussions below) and excluding: (1) the change
in the fair value of derivative instruments and (2) unrealized gains or losses on liabilities
measured at fair value.
53
Part I
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Volume |
|
|
Interest income(1) / expense |
|
|
Average Rate(1) |
|
Quarter ended June 30, |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market & other short-term investments |
|
$ |
849,763 |
|
|
$ |
101,819 |
|
|
$ |
624 |
|
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
% |
|
|
0.46 |
% |
Government obligations (2) |
|
|
1,422,418 |
|
|
|
1,540,821 |
|
|
|
8,157 |
|
|
|
15,904 |
|
|
|
2.30 |
% |
|
|
4.14 |
% |
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
3,141,519 |
|
|
|
4,322,708 |
|
|
|
35,418 |
|
|
|
60,012 |
|
|
|
4.52 |
% |
|
|
5.57 |
% |
Corporate bonds |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
7,458 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
5.82 |
% |
|
|
10.86 |
% |
FHLB stock |
|
|
68,857 |
|
|
|
86,509 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
3.35 |
% |
|
|
3.65 |
% |
Equity securities |
|
|
1,377 |
|
|
|
1,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
3.65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments (3) |
|
|
5,485,934 |
|
|
|
6,061,292 |
|
|
|
44,803 |
|
|
|
77,041 |
|
|
|
3.28 |
% |
|
|
5.10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans |
|
|
3,547,874 |
|
|
|
3,425,235 |
|
|
|
52,806 |
|
|
|
51,717 |
|
|
|
5.97 |
% |
|
|
6.06 |
% |
Construction loans |
|
|
1,445,251 |
|
|
|
1,626,141 |
|
|
|
9,132 |
|
|
|
13,142 |
|
|
|
2.53 |
% |
|
|
3.24 |
% |
C&I and commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
6,199,005 |
|
|
|
6,423,055 |
|
|
|
65,386 |
|
|
|
66,801 |
|
|
|
4.23 |
% |
|
|
4.17 |
% |
Finance leases |
|
|
305,414 |
|
|
|
347,732 |
|
|
|
6,223 |
|
|
|
7,111 |
|
|
|
8.17 |
% |
|
|
8.20 |
% |
Consumer loans |
|
|
1,528,264 |
|
|
|
1,678,057 |
|
|
|
44,223 |
|
|
|
47,436 |
|
|
|
11.61 |
% |
|
|
11.34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans (4) (5) |
|
|
13,025,808 |
|
|
|
13,500,220 |
|
|
|
177,770 |
|
|
|
186,207 |
|
|
|
5.47 |
% |
|
|
5.53 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
18,511,742 |
|
|
$ |
19,561,512 |
|
|
$ |
222,573 |
|
|
$ |
263,248 |
|
|
|
4.82 |
% |
|
|
5.40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokered CDs |
|
$ |
7,210,631 |
|
|
$ |
7,051,179 |
|
|
$ |
41,499 |
|
|
$ |
56,677 |
|
|
|
2.31 |
% |
|
|
3.22 |
% |
Other interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
4,919,662 |
|
|
|
4,146,552 |
|
|
|
22,267 |
|
|
|
23,443 |
|
|
|
1.82 |
% |
|
|
2.27 |
% |
Loans payable |
|
|
406,044 |
|
|
|
768,505 |
|
|
|
1,265 |
|
|
|
614 |
|
|
|
1.25 |
% |
|
|
0.32 |
% |
Other borrowed funds |
|
|
2,882,674 |
|
|
|
3,862,885 |
|
|
|
27,080 |
|
|
|
31,646 |
|
|
|
3.77 |
% |
|
|
3.29 |
% |
FHLB advances |
|
|
959,011 |
|
|
|
1,450,478 |
|
|
|
7,587 |
|
|
|
8,317 |
|
|
|
3.17 |
% |
|
|
2.30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities (6) |
|
$ |
16,378,022 |
|
|
$ |
17,279,599 |
|
|
$ |
99,698 |
|
|
$ |
120,697 |
|
|
|
2.44 |
% |
|
|
2.80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
122,875 |
|
|
$ |
142,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.38 |
% |
|
|
2.60 |
% |
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.66 |
% |
|
|
2.92 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Volume |
|
|
Interest income(1) / expense |
|
|
Average Rate(1) |
|
Six-Month Period Ended June 30, |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market & other short-term investments |
|
$ |
877,029 |
|
|
$ |
108,314 |
|
|
$ |
1,060 |
|
|
$ |
208 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
% |
|
|
0.39 |
% |
Government obligations (2) |
|
|
1,353,376 |
|
|
|
1,341,934 |
|
|
|
16,977 |
|
|
|
35,505 |
|
|
|
2.53 |
% |
|
|
5.34 |
% |
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
3,203,535 |
|
|
|
4,288,731 |
|
|
|
76,000 |
|
|
|
123,433 |
|
|
|
4.78 |
% |
|
|
5.80 |
% |
Corporate bonds |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
7,584 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
5.85 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
FHLB stock |
|
|
68,620 |
|
|
|
78,856 |
|
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
4.17 |
% |
|
|
2.94 |
% |
Equity securities |
|
|
1,587 |
|
|
|
2,167 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
1.91 |
% |
|
|
3.35 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments (3) |
|
|
5,506,147 |
|
|
|
5,827,586 |
|
|
|
95,528 |
|
|
|
160,565 |
|
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
5.56 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans |
|
|
3,550,968 |
|
|
|
3,460,647 |
|
|
|
106,405 |
|
|
|
105,766 |
|
|
|
6.04 |
% |
|
|
6.16 |
% |
Construction loans |
|
|
1,464,178 |
|
|
|
1,586,125 |
|
|
|
17,885 |
|
|
|
27,244 |
|
|
|
2.46 |
% |
|
|
3.46 |
% |
C&I and commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
6,424,543 |
|
|
|
6,267,792 |
|
|
|
132,790 |
|
|
|
130,946 |
|
|
|
4.17 |
% |
|
|
4.21 |
% |
Finance leases |
|
|
309,633 |
|
|
|
353,969 |
|
|
|
12,566 |
|
|
|
14,693 |
|
|
|
8.18 |
% |
|
|
8.37 |
% |
Consumer loans |
|
|
1,546,732 |
|
|
|
1,701,580 |
|
|
|
89,043 |
|
|
|
96,030 |
|
|
|
11.61 |
% |
|
|
11.38 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans (4) (5) |
|
|
13,296,054 |
|
|
|
13,370,113 |
|
|
|
358,689 |
|
|
|
374,679 |
|
|
|
5.44 |
% |
|
|
5.65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
18,802,201 |
|
|
$ |
19,197,699 |
|
|
$ |
454,217 |
|
|
$ |
535,244 |
|
|
|
4.87 |
% |
|
|
5.62 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokered CDs |
|
$ |
7,330,746 |
|
|
$ |
7,255,053 |
|
|
$ |
85,881 |
|
|
$ |
129,510 |
|
|
|
2.36 |
% |
|
|
3.60 |
% |
Other interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
4,775,792 |
|
|
|
4,087,541 |
|
|
|
43,850 |
|
|
|
48,635 |
|
|
|
1.85 |
% |
|
|
2.40 |
% |
Loans payable |
|
|
604,144 |
|
|
|
534,331 |
|
|
|
3,442 |
|
|
|
960 |
|
|
|
1.15 |
% |
|
|
0.36 |
% |
Other borrowed funds |
|
|
2,943,079 |
|
|
|
3,609,918 |
|
|
|
54,380 |
|
|
|
64,568 |
|
|
|
3.73 |
% |
|
|
3.61 |
% |
FHLB advances |
|
|
965,269 |
|
|
|
1,496,949 |
|
|
|
15,281 |
|
|
|
16,609 |
|
|
|
3.19 |
% |
|
|
2.24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities (6) |
|
$ |
16,619,030 |
|
|
$ |
16,983,792 |
|
|
$ |
202,834 |
|
|
$ |
260,282 |
|
|
|
2.46 |
% |
|
|
3.09 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
251,383 |
|
|
$ |
274,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.41 |
% |
|
|
2.53 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.70 |
% |
|
|
2.89 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On an adjusted tax-equivalent basis. The adjusted tax-equivalent yield was estimated by
dividing the interest rate spread on exempt assets by 1 less Puerto Rico statutory tax rate as
adjusted for changes to enacted tax rates (40.95% for the Corporations subsidiaries other
than IBEs and 35.95% for the Corporations IBEs) and adding to it the cost of interest-bearing
liabilities. The tax-equivalent adjustment recognizes the income tax savings when comparing
taxable and tax-exempt assets. Management believes that it is a |
54
|
|
|
|
|
standard practice in the banking industry to present net interest income, interest rate spread
and net interest margin on a fully tax-equivalent basis. Therefore, management believes these
measures provide useful information to investors by allowing them to make peer comparisons.
Changes in the fair value of derivative and unrealized gains or losses on liabilities measured
at fair value are excluded from interest income and interest expense because the changes in
valuation do not affect interest paid or received. |
|
(2) |
|
Government obligations include debt issued by government sponsored agencies. |
|
(3) |
|
Unrealized gains and losses in available-for-sale securities are excluded from the average
volumes. |
|
(4) |
|
Average loan balances include the average of non-accrual loans. |
|
(5) |
|
Interest income on loans includes $2.5 million and $2.7 million for the second quarter of
2010 and 2009, respectively, and $5.6 million and $5.5 million for the six-month period ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, of income from prepayment penalties and late fees
related to the Corporations loan portfolio. |
|
(6) |
|
Unrealized gains and losses on liabilities measured at fair value are excluded from the
average volumes. |
55
Part II
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended June 30, |
|
|
Six-month period ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 compared to 2009 |
|
|
2010 compared to 2009 |
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) |
|
|
Increase (decrease) |
|
|
|
Due to: |
|
|
Due to: |
|
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Interest income on interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market & other short-term investments |
|
$ |
706 |
|
|
$ |
(199 |
) |
|
$ |
507 |
|
|
$ |
1,209 |
|
|
$ |
(357 |
) |
|
$ |
852 |
|
Government obligations |
|
|
(1,142 |
) |
|
|
(6,605 |
) |
|
|
(7,747 |
) |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
(18,829 |
) |
|
|
(18,528 |
) |
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
(14,573 |
) |
|
|
(10,021 |
) |
|
|
(24,594 |
) |
|
|
(27,994 |
) |
|
|
(19,439 |
) |
|
|
(47,433 |
) |
Corporate bonds |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(177 |
) |
FHLB stock |
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
|
(15,270 |
) |
|
|
(16,968 |
) |
|
|
(32,238 |
) |
|
|
(26,838 |
) |
|
|
(38,199 |
) |
|
|
(65,037 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans |
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
(753 |
) |
|
|
1,089 |
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
|
|
(2,114 |
) |
|
|
639 |
|
Construction loans |
|
|
(1,354 |
) |
|
|
(2,656 |
) |
|
|
(4,010 |
) |
|
|
(1,967 |
) |
|
|
(7,392 |
) |
|
|
(9,359 |
) |
C&I and commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
(2,351 |
) |
|
|
936 |
|
|
|
(1,415 |
) |
|
|
3,277 |
|
|
|
(1,433 |
) |
|
|
1,844 |
|
Finance leases |
|
|
(862 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(888 |
) |
|
|
(1,806 |
) |
|
|
(321 |
) |
|
|
(2,127 |
) |
Consumer loans |
|
|
(4,292 |
) |
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
(3,213 |
) |
|
|
(8,871 |
) |
|
|
1,884 |
|
|
|
(6,987 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
(7,017 |
) |
|
|
(1,420 |
) |
|
|
(8,437 |
) |
|
|
(6,614 |
) |
|
|
(9,376 |
) |
|
|
(15,990 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
(22,287 |
) |
|
|
(18,388 |
) |
|
|
(40,675 |
) |
|
|
(33,452 |
) |
|
|
(47,575 |
) |
|
|
(81,027 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokered CDs |
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
|
(16,301 |
) |
|
|
(15,178 |
) |
|
|
1,309 |
|
|
|
(44,938 |
) |
|
|
(43,629 |
) |
Other interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
3,947 |
|
|
|
(5,123 |
) |
|
|
(1,176 |
) |
|
|
7,334 |
|
|
|
(12,119 |
) |
|
|
(4,785 |
) |
Loans payable |
|
|
(712 |
) |
|
|
1,363 |
|
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
2,341 |
|
|
|
2,482 |
|
Other borrowed funds |
|
|
(8,637 |
) |
|
|
4,071 |
|
|
|
(4,566 |
) |
|
|
(12,183 |
) |
|
|
1,995 |
|
|
|
(10,188 |
) |
FHLB advances |
|
|
(3,361 |
) |
|
|
2,631 |
|
|
|
(730 |
) |
|
|
(7,212 |
) |
|
|
5,884 |
|
|
|
(1,328 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
(7,640 |
) |
|
|
(13,359 |
) |
|
|
(20,999 |
) |
|
|
(10,611 |
) |
|
|
(46,837 |
) |
|
|
(57,448 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net interest income |
|
$ |
(14,647 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,029 |
) |
|
$ |
(19,676 |
) |
|
$ |
(22,841 |
) |
|
$ |
(738 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,579 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portions of the Corporations interest-earning assets, mostly investments in obligations
of some U.S. Government agencies and sponsored entities, generate interest which is exempt from
income tax, principally in Puerto Rico. Also, interest and gains on sales of investments held by
the Corporations international banking entities are tax-exempt under the Puerto Rico tax law,
except for a temporary 5% tax rate imposed by the Puerto Rico Government on IBEs net income
effective for years that commenced after December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012 (refer to the
Income Taxes discussion below for additional information). To facilitate the comparison of all
interest data related to these assets, the interest income has been converted to an adjusted
taxable equivalent basis. The tax equivalent yield was estimated by dividing the interest rate
spread on exempt assets by 1 less the Puerto Rico statutory tax rate as adjusted for changes to
enacted tax rates (40.95% for the Corporations subsidiaries other than IBEs and 35.95% for the
Corporations IBEs) and adding to it the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The
computation considers the interest expense disallowance required by Puerto Rico tax law. Refer to
the Income Taxes discussion below for additional information of the Puerto Rico tax law.
The presentation of net interest income excluding the effects of the changes in the fair value
of the derivative instruments and unrealized gains or losses on liabilities measured at fair value
(valuations) provides additional information about the Corporations net interest income and
facilitates comparability and analysis. The changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments
and unrealized gains or losses on liabilities measured at fair value have no effect on interest due
or interest earned on interest-bearing liabilities or interest-earning assets, respectively, or on
interest payments exchanged with derivatives counterparties.
56
The following table reconciles net interest income in accordance with GAAP to net interest
income excluding valuations, and to net interest income on an adjusted tax-equivalent basis and
net interest rate spread and net interest margin on a GAAP basis to these items excluding
valuations and on an adjusted tax-equivalent basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Six-Month Period Ended |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
Interest Income GAAP |
|
$ |
214,864 |
|
|
$ |
252,780 |
|
|
$ |
435,852 |
|
|
$ |
511,103 |
|
Unrealized loss (gain) on
derivative instruments |
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
(3,465 |
) |
|
|
1,231 |
|
|
|
(4,240 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income excluding valuations |
|
|
215,351 |
|
|
|
249,315 |
|
|
|
437,083 |
|
|
|
506,863 |
|
Tax-equivalent adjustment |
|
|
7,222 |
|
|
|
13,933 |
|
|
|
17,134 |
|
|
|
28,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on a tax-equivalent basis excluding valuations |
|
|
222,573 |
|
|
|
263,248 |
|
|
|
454,217 |
|
|
|
535,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense GAAP |
|
|
95,802 |
|
|
|
121,766 |
|
|
|
199,927 |
|
|
|
258,491 |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on
derivative instruments and liabilities measured at fair value |
|
|
3,896 |
|
|
|
(1,069 |
) |
|
|
2,907 |
|
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense excluding valuations |
|
|
99,698 |
|
|
|
120,697 |
|
|
|
202,834 |
|
|
|
260,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income GAAP |
|
$ |
119,062 |
|
|
$ |
131,014 |
|
|
$ |
235,925 |
|
|
$ |
252,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income excluding valuations |
|
$ |
115,653 |
|
|
$ |
128,618 |
|
|
$ |
234,249 |
|
|
$ |
246,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis excluding valuations |
|
$ |
122,875 |
|
|
$ |
142,551 |
|
|
$ |
251,383 |
|
|
$ |
274,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Interest-Earning Assets |
|
$ |
18,511,742 |
|
|
$ |
19,561,512 |
|
|
$ |
18,802,201 |
|
|
$ |
19,197,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Interest-Bearing Liabilities |
|
$ |
16,378,022 |
|
|
$ |
17,279,599 |
|
|
$ |
16,619,030 |
|
|
$ |
16,983,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average rate on interest-earning assets GAAP |
|
|
4.66 |
% |
|
|
5.18 |
% |
|
|
4.68 |
% |
|
|
5.37 |
% |
Average rate on interest-earning assets excluding valuations |
|
|
4.66 |
% |
|
|
5.11 |
% |
|
|
4.69 |
% |
|
|
5.32 |
% |
Average rate on interest-earning assets on a tax-equivalent basis and excluding valuations |
|
|
4.82 |
% |
|
|
5.40 |
% |
|
|
4.87 |
% |
|
|
5.62 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average rate on interest-bearing liabilities GAAP |
|
|
2.35 |
% |
|
|
2.83 |
% |
|
|
2.43 |
% |
|
|
3.07 |
% |
Average rate on interest-bearing liabilities excluding valuations |
|
|
2.44 |
% |
|
|
2.80 |
% |
|
|
2.46 |
% |
|
|
3.09 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread GAAP |
|
|
2.31 |
% |
|
|
2.35 |
% |
|
|
2.25 |
% |
|
|
2.30 |
% |
Net interest spread excluding valuations |
|
|
2.22 |
% |
|
|
2.31 |
% |
|
|
2.23 |
% |
|
|
2.23 |
% |
Net interest spread on a tax-equivalent basis and excluding valuations |
|
|
2.38 |
% |
|
|
2.60 |
% |
|
|
2.41 |
% |
|
|
2.53 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin GAAP |
|
|
2.58 |
% |
|
|
2.69 |
% |
|
|
2.53 |
% |
|
|
2.65 |
% |
Net interest margin excluding valuations |
|
|
2.51 |
% |
|
|
2.64 |
% |
|
|
2.51 |
% |
|
|
2.59 |
% |
Net interest margin on a tax-equivalent basis and excluding valuations |
|
|
2.66 |
% |
|
|
2.92 |
% |
|
|
2.70 |
% |
|
|
2.89 |
% |
The following table summarizes the components of the changes in fair values of interest rate
swaps and interest rate caps, which are included in interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six-month period ended June 30, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps |
|
$ |
(440 |
) |
|
$ |
2,628 |
|
|
$ |
(1,171 |
) |
|
$ |
2,850 |
|
Interest rate swaps on loans |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
1,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized (loss) gain on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges) |
|
$ |
(487 |
) |
|
$ |
3,465 |
|
|
$ |
(1,231 |
) |
|
$ |
4,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
The following table summarizes the components of the net unrealized gain and loss on
derivatives (economic undesignated hedges) and net unrealized gain and loss on liabilities
measured at fair value which are included in interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended June 30, |
|
|
Six-month period ended June 30, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps and options on brokered CDs and stock index deposits |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
892 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
5,318 |
|
Interest rate swaps and options on medium-term notes measured at fair value
and stock index notes |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges) |
|
$ |
(81 |
) |
|
$ |
945 |
|
|
$ |
(50 |
) |
|
$ |
5,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (gain) loss on liabilities measured at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (gain) loss on brokered CDs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,555 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,696 |
) |
Unrealized (gain) loss on medium-term notes |
|
|
(3,815 |
) |
|
|
1,679 |
|
|
|
(2,857 |
) |
|
|
1,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized (gain) loss on liabilities measured at fair value |
|
$ |
(3,815 |
) |
|
$ |
124 |
|
|
$ |
(2,857 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges)
and liabilities measured at fair value |
|
$ |
(3,896 |
) |
|
$ |
1,069 |
|
|
$ |
(2,907 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,791 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on interest-earning assets primarily represents interest earned on loans
receivable and investment securities.
Interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities primarily represents interest paid on
brokered CDs, branch-based deposits, repurchase agreements, advances from the FHLB and FED and
notes payable.
Unrealized gains or losses on derivatives represent changes in the fair value of derivatives,
primarily interest rate caps and swaps used for protection against rising interest rates and for
2009 mainly related to interest rate swaps that economically hedge brokered CDs and medium-term
notes. All interest rate swaps related to brokered CDs were called during the course of 2009 due
to the low level of interest rates and, as a consequence, the Corporation exercised its call option
on the swapped-to-floating brokered CDs that were recorded at fair value.
Unrealized gains or losses on liabilities measured at fair value represent the change in the
fair value of such liabilities (medium-term notes and brokered CDs), other than the accrual of
interests.
Derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps, are subject to market risk. While the
Corporation does have certain trading derivatives to facilitate customer transactions, the
Corporation does not utilize derivative instruments for speculative purposes. As of June 30, 2010,
most of the interest rate swaps outstanding are used for protection against rising interest rates.
In the past, the volume of interest rate swaps was much higher, as they were used to convert the
fixed-rate of a large portfolio of brokered CDs, mainly those with long-term maturities, to a
variable rate and to mitigate the interest rate risk related to variable rate loans. Refer to
Note 8 of the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for further details
concerning the notional amounts of derivative instruments and additional information. As is the
case with investment securities, the market value of derivative instruments is largely a function
of the financial markets expectations regarding the future direction of interest rates.
Accordingly, current market values are not necessarily indicative of the future impact of
derivative instruments on net interest income. This will depend, for the most part, on the shape
of the yield curve, the level of interest rates, as well as the expectations for rates in the
future.
Net interest income decreased 9% to $119.1 million for the second quarter of 2010 from $131.0
million in the second quarter of 2009 and by 7% to $235.9 million for the first six-months of 2010
from $252.6 million in the first half of 2009. The decrease in net interest income was mainly
related to the deleveraging of the Corporations balance sheet to preserve its capital position and
the adverse impact on net interest margin in 2010 of maintaining a higher liquidity position.
The average volume of interest-earning assets for the second quarter and first half of 2010
decreased by $1.0 billion and $395.5 million, respectively, as compared to comparable periods in
2009. The decrease was driven by the sale of approximately $2.2 billion of investment securities
over the last 12 months, mainly U.S. agency MBS, and by loan repayments. Proceeds from sales and
repayments of MBS and loans were used in part to pay down advances from the FED and FHLB and
maturing repurchase agreements. During 2009, the FED encouraged banks to borrow from the Discount
Window in an effort to restore liquidity and calm to the credit markets. As market conditions
improved, participating financial institutions have been asked to shift to regular funding sources,
and repay borrowings such as advances from the FED Discount Window. During the first half of 2010,
the Corporation repaid the remaining balance of $900 million in FED advances outstanding as of
December 31, 2009.
Also, net interest income for 2010 was adversely affected by the maintenance of a higher
liquidity position. During the first four months of 2010, a key objective was to strengthen
balance sheet liquidity due to concerns about potential disruptions from the consolidation of the
Puerto Rico banking industry, which resulted in higher investments in overnight funds. Liquidity
volumes were significantly higher than normal levels as reflected in average balances in money
market and overnight funding of $849.8 million and $877.0 million for the second quarter and first
half of 2010, respectively, compared to $101.8 million and $108.3 million for the comparable
periods in 2009. The
58
Corporation has not noted any disruptions since the consolidation of the Puerto Rico banking
industry that took place on April 30, 2010, and is investing some of its excess liquidity in higher
yielding investments.
Net interest margin on an adjusted tax-equivalent basis decreased to 2.66% for the second
quarter of 2010 from 2.92% for the same period in 2009, and to 2.70% for the first six months of
2010 from 2.89% for the first half of 2009 mainly due to the high volume of non-performing loans,
which continued to pressure net interest margins as interest payments of approximately $2.7 million
and $4.2 million during the second quarter and first half of 2010, respectively, was applied
against the related principal balance under the cost-recovery method. Also, affecting the margin
were the lower yields on investments affected by the MBS sales and the approximately $969 million
in investment securities called over the last twelve months that were replaced with lower yielding
U.S. agency investment securities. These factors were partially offset by the favorable impact of
lower pricing on both brokered CDs and core deposits that more than offset declines in loan yields.
The weighted-average cost of brokered CDs decreased by 91 basis points to 2.31% for the second
quarter of 2010 from 3.22% for the same period a year ago and by 124 basis points to 2.36% for the
first half of 2010 from 3.60% for the first half of 2009, primarily due to the replacement of
maturing or callable brokered CDs that had interest rates above current market rates. Also, the
Corporation continues with its measures to improve loan pricing, is actively increasing spreads on
loan renewals and has increased the use of interest rate floors in new, and renewals of, commercial
and construction loan agreements to protect net interest margins.
On an adjusted tax-equivalent basis, net interest income decreased by $19.7 million, or 14%,
for the second quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 and by $23.6 million, or 9%, for
the first half of 2010 compared to the first half of 2009. The decrease for 2010 includes a
decrease of $6.7 million and $11.2 million for the second quarter and first half of 2010,
respectively, compared to the same period in 2009 in the tax-equivalent adjustment. The
tax-equivalent adjustment increases interest income on tax-exempt securities and loans by an amount
which makes tax-exempt income comparable, on a pre-tax basis, to the Corporations taxable income
as previously stated. The decrease in the tax-equivalent adjustment was mainly related to decreases
in the interest rate spread on tax-exempt assets, primarily due to a higher proportion of taxable
assets to total interest-earning assets resulting from the maintenance of a higher liquidity
position and lower yields on U.S. agency and MBS held by the Corporations IBE subsidiary. The
Corporation replaced securities called and prepayments and sales of MBS with shorter-term
securities.
Provision and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
The provision for loan and lease losses is charged to earnings to maintain the allowance for
loan and lease losses at a level that the Corporation considers adequate to absorb probable losses
inherent in the portfolio. The adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses is also based
upon a number of additional factors including trends in charge-offs and delinquencies, current
economic conditions, the fair value of the underlying collateral and the financial condition of the
borrowers, and, as such, includes amounts based on judgments and estimates made by the Corporation.
Although the Corporation believes that the allowance for loan and lease losses is adequate, factors
beyond the Corporations control, including factors affecting the economies of Puerto Rico, the
United States, the U.S. Virgin Islands and the British Virgin Islands, may contribute to
delinquencies and defaults, thus necessitating additional reserves.
For the quarter ended on June 30, 2010, the Corporation recorded a provision for loan and
lease losses of $146.8 million compared to $235.2 million for the comparable period in 2009. Much
of the decrease in the provision was related to the construction and C&I loan portfolios, primarily
due to a slower migration of loans to non-performing and/or impaired status, as well as decreases
in charge-offs and the overall reduction of the loan portfolio. The provision for loan and lease
losses for the first six months of 2010 was $317.8 million compared to $294.6 million for the same
period in 2009. The higher provision for the first half of 2010, compared to 2009, is mainly
attributable to increases in specific reserves on impaired loans, in particular for commercial
mortgage loans and increases in the provision for the residential loan portfolio, which has been
affected by historical loss rates and declines in collateral value.
In terms of geography, in Puerto Rico, the Corporation recorded a provision of $112.0 million
and $200.0 million in the second quarter and first half of 2010, respectively, compared to $141.2
million and $179.5 million, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2009. The decrease for the
second quarter of 2010 is mainly related to the slower migration of loans to non-performing and/or
impaired status, combined with lower charge-offs and general reserve releases attributable to an
overall decrease in the C&I portfolio. The provision for construction loans in Puerto Rico
decreased by $20.9 million for the second quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The
provision for C&I loans in Puerto Rico decreased by $25.0 million, including the impact of lower
reserves for certain loans that when individually evaluated for impairment in 2010, based on the
underlying value of the collateral, the specific reserves required for these loans were lower than
those general reserves allocated in periods prior to 2010. The provision for commercial and
residential mortgage loans in Puerto Rico for the second quarter of 2010, compared to the same
period in 2009, increased by $0.7 million and $16.6 million, respectively, both affected by
negative trends in loss rates and falling property values. The reserve factors for residential
mortgage loans were recalibrated as part of further segmentation and analysis of this portfolio for
purposes of computing the required specific and general reserves. The review included the
incorporation of updated loss factors to loans expected to liquidate considering the expected
realization of the values of similar assets at disposition. The provision for consumer loans,
including finance leases, in Puerto Rico decreased slightly by $0.7 million for the second quarter
of 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, mainly related to improvements in delinquency and
charge-offs trends.
59
In Puerto Rico, the increase in the provision for the first half of 2010, compared to the
first half of 2009, was mainly related to the residential and commercial mortgage loan portfolio,
which increased by $24.6 million and $14.7 million, respectively, driven by higher charge-offs and
pressures on collateral values. The provision for construction loans increased by $10.3 million
mainly related to higher charges to specific reserves in 2010, in particular charges made during
the first quarter of 2010. This was partially offset by a decrease of $37.8 million in the
provision for the C&I loan portfolio attributable to the overall decrease in the size of this
portfolio and lower reserves for certain loans individually evaluated compared to higher general
reserves allocated to these loans in 2009.
With respect to the loan portfolio in the United States, the Corporation recorded a provision
of $33.6 million and $104.8 million in the second quarter and first half of 2010, respectively,
compared to $85.7 million and $100.8 million, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2009.
The decrease for the second quarter was also mainly related to the construction loan portfolio and
reflected the slower migration of loans to non-performing and/or impaired status, lower
charge-offs, and the overall reduction of the Corporations exposure to construction loans in
Florida. Meanwhile, the increase in the provision for the first half of 2010 compared to the same
period in 2009 was mainly related to the residential and commercial mortgage loan portfolio, which
increased by $10.0 million and $16.5 million, respectively, partially offset by reductions of $19.4
million, $2.0 million and $1.0 million in the provision for the construction, consumer and C&I
loans, respectively. As of June 30, 2010, approximately $175.3 million, or 92%, of the total
exposure to construction loans in Florida was individually measured for impairment. The
Corporation continues to reduce its credit exposure on this market through the disposition of
assets and different loss mitigation initiatives as the end of this difficult economic cycle
appears to be approaching. Over the last three quarters, the Corporation has completed the sale of
approximately $123.8 million of impaired credits in Florida.
The provision recorded for the loan portfolio in the Virgin Islands amounted to $1.2 million
and $13.0 million in the second quarter and first half of 2010, a decrease of $7.0 million and $1.3
million, respectively, compared to the same periods a year ago mainly associated with decreases in
general reserve factors allocated to the residential mortgage loan portfolio that incorporate the
significantly lower historical charge-offs in this region. Refer to the discussions under Credit
Risk Management below for an analysis of the allowance for loan and lease losses, non-performing
assets, impaired loans and related information and refer to the discussions under Financial
Condition and Operating Analysis Loan Portfolio and under Risk Management Credit Risk
Management below for additional information concerning the Corporations loan portfolio exposure
in the geographic areas where the Corporation does business.
Non-Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six-Month Period Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Other service charges on loans |
|
$ |
1,486 |
|
|
$ |
1,523 |
|
|
$ |
3,242 |
|
|
$ |
3,052 |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
3,501 |
|
|
|
3,327 |
|
|
|
6,969 |
|
|
|
6,492 |
|
Mortgage banking activities |
|
|
2,140 |
|
|
|
2,373 |
|
|
|
4,640 |
|
|
|
3,179 |
|
Rental income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
856 |
|
Insurance income |
|
|
2,146 |
|
|
|
2,229 |
|
|
|
4,421 |
|
|
|
4,599 |
|
Other operating income |
|
|
6,015 |
|
|
|
4,312 |
|
|
|
10,578 |
|
|
|
8,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income before net gain on investments |
|
|
15,288 |
|
|
|
14,171 |
|
|
|
29,850 |
|
|
|
26,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of VISA shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on sale of investments |
|
|
24,240 |
|
|
|
10,305 |
|
|
|
44,936 |
|
|
|
28,143 |
|
Other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) on equity securities |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(603 |
) |
|
|
(388 |
) |
OTTI on debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,061 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,061 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on investments |
|
|
24,237 |
|
|
|
9,244 |
|
|
|
55,001 |
|
|
|
26,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
39,525 |
|
|
$ |
23,415 |
|
|
$ |
84,851 |
|
|
$ |
53,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income primarily consists of other service charges on loans; service charges
on deposit accounts; commissions derived from various banking, securities and insurance activities;
gains and losses on mortgage banking activities; and net gains and losses on investments and
impairments.
Other service charges on loans consist mainly of service charges on credit card-related
activities and other non-deferrable fees (e.g. agent, commitment, unused and drawing fees).
Service charges on deposit accounts include monthly fees and other fees on deposit accounts.
Income from mortgage banking activities includes gains on sales and securitization of loans
and revenues earned administering residential mortgage loans originated by the Corporation and
subsequently sold with servicing retained. In addition, lower-of-cost-or-market valuation
adjustments to the Corporations residential mortgage loans held for sale portfolio and servicing
rights, if any, are recorded as part of mortgage banking activities.
60
Rental income represents income generated by the Corporations subsidiary, First Leasing, on
the daily rental of various types of motor vehicles. As part of its strategies to focus on its core
business, the Corporation divested its short-term auto rental business during the fourth quarter of
2009.
Insurance income consists of insurance commissions earned by the Corporations subsidiary
FirstBank Insurance Agency, Inc., and the Banks subsidiary in the U.S. Virgin Islands, FirstBank
Insurance V.I., Inc. These subsidiaries offer a wide variety of insurance business.
The other operating income category is composed of miscellaneous fees such as debit, credit
card and point of sale (POS) interchange fees and check and cash management fees and includes
commissions from the Corporations broker-dealer subsidiary, FirstBank Puerto Rico Securities.
The net gain (loss) on investment securities reflects gains or losses as a result of sales
that are consistent with the Corporations investment policies as well as OTTI charges on the
Corporations investment portfolio.
Non-interest income increased $16.1 million to $39.5 million for the second quarter of 2010
from $23.4 million for the second quarter of 2009. The increase in non-interest income reflected:
|
|
|
An increase of $13.9 million in realized gains on the sale of investment securities
(mainly U.S. agency MBS). In an effort to manage interest rate risk, and take advantage of
favorable market valuations, approximately $350 million of 30 year fixed-rate U.S. agency
MBS and $250 million of 5-7 year U.S. Treasury Notes were sold in the second quarter of
2010 resulting in a gain of $24.2 million compared to a gain of $10.3 million on the sale
of approximately $342 million of investment securities, mainly U.S. agency MBS, in the
second quarter of 2009. |
|
|
|
Commissions of $1.3 million earned by FirstBank Puerto Rico Securities, a recently
organized broker-dealer subsidiary engaged in a municipal securities underwriting business
for local Puerto Rico municipal bond issuers. |
|
|
|
The impact in the second quarter of 2009 of a $1.1 million OTTI charge on private label
MBS. |
Non-interest income increased $31.4 million to $190.0 million for the first six months of 2010
from $180.5 million for the first half of 2009. The increase in non-interest income reflected:
|
|
|
An increase of $16.8 million in realized gains on the sale of investment securities
(mainly U.S. agency MBS) and a $10.7 million gain on the sale of the remaining VISA Class C
shares. |
|
|
|
A $1.5 million increase in gains from mortgage banking activities due to higher
servicing fees and lower charges to the valuation allowance. |
|
|
|
Commissions of $1.6 million related to the Corporations broker-dealer business. |
Also contributing to the increase in non-interest income was higher fee income, mainly fees on
loans and service charges on deposits offset by lower income from vehicle rental activities.
Service charges on deposit accounts increased by $0.5 million as the Corporation continued to focus
on its core business strategies. No income from vehicle rental activities was recorded in 2010 as
the Corporation divested its short-term auto rental business during the fourth quarter of 2009.
61
Non-Interest Expenses
The following table presents the detail of non-interest expenses for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six-month Period Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Employees compensation and benefits |
|
$ |
30,958 |
|
|
$ |
34,472 |
|
|
$ |
62,686 |
|
|
$ |
68,714 |
|
Occupancy and equipment |
|
|
14,451 |
|
|
|
17,448 |
|
|
|
29,302 |
|
|
|
32,222 |
|
Deposit insurance premium |
|
|
15,369 |
|
|
|
14,895 |
|
|
|
32,022 |
|
|
|
19,775 |
|
Other taxes, insurance and supervisory fees |
|
|
5,054 |
|
|
|
5,744 |
|
|
|
10,740 |
|
|
|
11,537 |
|
Professional
fees recurring |
|
|
4,697 |
|
|
|
3,138 |
|
|
|
9,226 |
|
|
|
5,961 |
|
Professional
fees non-recurring |
|
|
907 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
1,665 |
|
|
|
567 |
|
Servicing and processing fees |
|
|
2,555 |
|
|
|
2,246 |
|
|
|
4,563 |
|
|
|
4,558 |
|
Business promotion |
|
|
3,340 |
|
|
|
3,836 |
|
|
|
5,545 |
|
|
|
6,952 |
|
Communications |
|
|
1,828 |
|
|
|
2,018 |
|
|
|
3,942 |
|
|
|
4,145 |
|
Net loss on REO operations |
|
|
10,816 |
|
|
|
6,626 |
|
|
|
14,509 |
|
|
|
12,001 |
|
Other |
|
|
8,636 |
|
|
|
5,361 |
|
|
|
15,773 |
|
|
|
14,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
98,611 |
|
|
$ |
95,988 |
|
|
$ |
189,973 |
|
|
$ |
180,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expenses increased $2.6 million to $98.6 million for the second quarter of 2010
from $96.0 million for the second quarter of 2009. The increase reflected:
|
|
|
An increase of $4.2 million in losses from REO operations, mainly due to higher losses
on sales, and write-downs to the value, of repossessed residential and commercial
properties in both Puerto Rico and Florida and a higher volume of
repossessed properties. |
|
|
|
A $3.6 million charge to the reserve for probable losses on outstanding unfunded loan
commitments, and |
|
|
|
A $2.3 million increase in professional fees attributable in part to higher legal fees
related to collections and foreclosure procedures and mortgage appraisals. |
The aforementioned increases were partially offset by decreases in expenses such as:
|
|
|
A decrease of $3.5 million in employees compensation, reflecting reductions in bonuses
and incentive compensation and a lower headcount. |
|
|
|
The impact in the second quarter of 2009 of a non-recurring $2.6 million charge to
property tax expense attributable to the reassessed value of certain properties |
Non-interest expenses increased $9.5 million to $190.0 million for the first half of 2010 from
$180.5 million for the same period in 2009. The increase reflected:
|
|
|
An increase of $12.2 million in the FDIC deposit insurance premium, as premium rates
increased and the level of deposits grew. |
|
|
|
A $6.8 million increase in the reserve for probable losses on outstanding unfunded loan
commitments. |
|
|
|
A $4.4 million increase in professional service fees, attributable in part to higher
legal fees related to collections and foreclosure procedures and mortgage appraisals. |
The aforementioned increases were partially offset by decreases in expenses such as:
|
|
|
A $6.0 million decrease in employees compensation and benefit expenses, mainly due to a
lower headcount and lower bonuses and incentive compensation expenses. The number of full
time equivalent employees decreased by approximately 190, or 7%, over the last 12 months. |
|
|
|
The impact in the first half of the aforementioned non-recurring $2.6 million charge to
property tax expense attributable to the reassessed value of certain properties. |
|
|
|
A $1.4 million reduction in business promotion expenses, and |
62
|
|
|
The impact in the first half of 2009 of a $4.0 million impairment charge associated with
the core deposit intangible asset in the Corporations Florida operations. |
As part of its business strategies to preserve its capital position, during 2010, the Corporation
continued reviewing its expense base to identify further cost reduction opportunities in
controllable expenses.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense includes Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands income taxes as well as applicable
U.S. federal and state taxes. The Corporation is subject to Puerto Rico income tax on its income
from all sources. As a Puerto Rico corporation, First BanCorp is treated as a foreign corporation
for U.S. income tax purposes and is generally subject to United States income tax only on its
income from sources within the United States or income effectively connected with the conduct of a
trade or business within the United States. Any such tax paid is creditable, within certain
conditions and limitations, against the Corporations Puerto Rico tax liability. The Corporation
is also subject to U.S. Virgin Islands taxes on its income from sources within that jurisdiction.
Any such tax paid is also creditable against the Corporations Puerto Rico tax liability, subject
to certain conditions and limitations.
Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994, as amended (PR Code), First BanCorp is
subject to a maximum statutory tax rate of 39%. In 2009, the Puerto Rico Government approved Act
No. 7 (the Act) to stimulate Puerto Ricos economy and to reduce the Puerto Rico Governments
fiscal deficit. The Act imposes a series of temporary and permanent measures, including the
imposition of a 5% surtax over the total income tax determined, which is applicable to
corporations, among others, whose combined income exceeds $100,000, effectively resulting in an
increase in the maximum statutory tax rate from 39% to 40.95% and an increase in the capital gain
statutory tax rate from 15% to 15.75%. This temporary measure is effective for tax years that
commenced after December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012. The PR Code also includes an
alternative minimum tax of 22% that applies if the Corporations regular income tax liability is
less than the alternative minimum tax requirements.
The Corporation has maintained an effective tax rate lower than the maximum statutory rate
mainly by investing in government obligations and mortgage-backed securities exempt from U.S. and
Puerto Rico income taxes and by doing business through IBEs of the Corporation and the Bank and
through the Banks subsidiary FirstBank Overseas Corporation, in which the interest income and gain
on sales is exempt from Puerto Rico and U.S. income taxation. Under the Act, all IBEs are subject
to a special 5% tax on their net income not otherwise subject to tax pursuant to the PR Code.
This temporary measure is also effective for tax years that commence after December 31, 2008 and
before January 1, 2012. The IBEs and FirstBank Overseas Corporation were created under the
International Banking Entity Act of Puerto Rico, which provides for total Puerto Rico tax exemption
on net income derived by IBEs operating in Puerto Rico. IBEs that operate as a unit of a bank pay
income taxes at normal rates to the extent that the IBEs net income exceeds 20% of the banks
total net taxable income.
For the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2010, the Corporation recognized an income
tax expense of $3.8 million and $10.7 million, respectively, compared to an income tax benefit of
$98.1 million and $112.3 million recorded for the same periods in 2009. The variance in income tax
expense mainly resulted from non-cash charges of approximately $45.1 million for the second quarter
of 2010 and $86.0 million for the first half of 2010 to increase the valuation allowance of the
Corporations deferred tax asset. Most of the increase is related to deferred tax assets created
in 2010 that were fully reserved. Approximately $3.5 million of the increase to the valuation
allowance, which was recorded in the first quarter of 2010, was related to deferred tax assets
created before 2010 and the remaining income tax expense is related to the operations of profitable
subsidiaries.
As of June 30, 2010, the deferred tax asset, net of a valuation allowance of $277.7 million,
amounted to $97.2 million compared to $109.2 million as of December 31, 2009. In addition to the
aforementioned $3.5 million increase in the valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets
created prior to 2010, the decrease in the deferred tax asset during 2010 was mainly related to the
creation of deferred tax liabilities in connection with unrealized gains on available for sale
securities; such charge was recorded as part of other comprehensive income.
Accounting for income taxes requires that companies assess whether a valuation allowance
should be recorded against their deferred tax assets based on the consideration of all available
evidence, using a more likely than not realization standard. Valuation allowances are
established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than
not to be realized. In making such assessment, significant weight is to be given to evidence that
can be objectively verified, including both positive and negative evidence. The accounting for
income taxes guidance requires the consideration of all sources of taxable income available to
realize the deferred tax asset, including the future reversal of existing temporary differences,
future taxable income exclusive of the reversal of temporary differences and carryforwards, taxable
income in carryback years and tax planning strategies. In estimating taxes, management assesses
the relative merits and risks of the appropriate tax treatment of transactions taking into account
statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance, and recognizes tax benefits only when deemed probable.
In assessing the weight of positive and negative evidence, a significant negative factor that
resulted in an increase in the valuation allowance was that the Corporations banking subsidiary,
FirstBank Puerto Rico, continues in a three-year historical cumulative loss
63
as of the end of the
second quarter of 2010, mainly as a result of charges to the provision for loan and lease losses,
especially in the construction loan portfolio in both the Puerto Rico and Florida markets, as a
result of the economic downturn. As of June 30, 2010, management concluded that $97.2 million of
the deferred tax assets will be realized. In assessing the likelihood of realizing the deferred
tax assets, management has considered all four sources of taxable income mentioned above and, even
though the Corporation expects to be profitable in the near future and to be able to realize the
deferred tax asset, given current uncertain economic conditions, the Corporation has only relied on
tax-planning strategies as the main source of taxable income to realize the deferred tax asset
amount. Among the most significant tax-planning strategies identified are: (i) sale of appreciated
assets, (ii) consolidation of profitable and unprofitable companies (in Puerto Rico each company
files a separate tax return; no consolidated tax returns are permitted), and (iii) deferral of
deductions without affecting their utilization. Management will continue monitoring the likelihood
of realizing the deferred tax assets in future periods. If future events differ from managements
June 30, 2010 assessment, an additional valuation allowance may need to be established which may
have a material adverse effect on the Corporations results of operations. Similarly, to the
extent the realization of a portion, or all, of the tax asset becomes more likely than not based
on changes in circumstances (such as, improved earnings, changes in tax laws or other relevant
changes), a reversal of that portion of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance will then be
recorded.
The increase in the valuation allowance does not have any impact on the Corporations
liquidity, nor does such an allowance preclude the Corporation from using tax losses, tax credits
or other deferred tax assets in the future.
The income tax provision in 2010 and 2009 was also impacted by adjustments to deferred tax
amounts as a result of the aforementioned changes to the PR Code enacted tax rates. Deferred tax
amounts have been adjusted for the effect of the change in the income tax rate considering the
enacted tax rate expected to apply to taxable income in the period in which the deferred tax asset
or liability is expected to be settled or realized and an adjustment of $1.0 million and $7.3
million was recorded for the second quarter and first half of 2010, respectively.
64
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND OPERATING DATA ANALYSIS
Assets
Total assets decreased to approximately $18.1 billion as of June 30, 2010, down $1.5 billion
from approximately $19.6 billion as of December 31, 2009. The decrease was primarily a result of a
net decrease of $1.4 billion in the loan portfolio largely attributed to repayments of
approximately $1.1 billion on credit facilities extended to the Puerto Rico government and/or
political subdivisions coupled with charge-offs, the sale of non-performing loans and a higher
allowance for loan and lease losses. The decrease in assets is consistent with the Corporations
decision to deleverage its balance sheet to preserve its capital position. Also, there was a
decrease of $284.3 million in investment securities and a reduction of $159.0 million in cash and
cash equivalents. The Corporations decrease in investment securities is mainly related to the
sale of approximately $800 million in U.S. agency MBS and $252 million in US Treasury notes during
the first half of 2010, the call of approximately $951 million of investment securities, mainly
U.S. agency debt securities, prior to their contractual maturity, and principal repayments of MBS.
During the first four months of 2010, the Corporation maintained higher than normal liquidity
levels due to concerns about potential disruptions from the consolidation of the Puerto Rico
banking industry; those disruptions were not observed, however. Towards the end of the first half
of 2010, the Corporation began to invest some of its excess liquidity in higher yielding
investments and reductions of brokered CDs and other borrowings. Additionally, the Corporation
repaid the remaining $900 million outstanding from advances from the FED.
Loan Portfolio
The following table presents the composition of the Corporations loan portfolio, including
loans held for sale, as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Residential mortgage loans, including loans held for sale |
|
$ |
3,582,793 |
|
|
$ |
3,616,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
1,665,551 |
|
|
|
1,693,424 |
|
Construction loans |
|
|
1,310,065 |
|
|
|
1,492,589 |
|
Commercial and Industrial loans (1) |
|
|
3,931,991 |
|
|
|
4,927,304 |
|
Loans to local financial institutions collateralized by
real estate mortgages |
|
|
304,170 |
|
|
|
321,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial loans |
|
|
7,211,777 |
|
|
|
8,434,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance leases |
|
|
299,060 |
|
|
|
318,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and other loans |
|
|
1,510,108 |
|
|
|
1,579,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, gross |
|
$ |
12,603,738 |
|
|
$ |
13,949,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of June 30, 2010, includes $1.5 billion of commercial loans that are secured by real
estate but are not dependent upon the real estate for repayment. |
As of June 30, 2010, the Corporations total loans decreased by $1.3 billion, when
compared with the balance as of December 31, 2009. All major loan categories decreased from 2009
levels, driven by the aforementioned repayments of approximately $1.1 billion from credit
facilities extended to the Puerto Rico government as well as charge-offs, pay-downs and sales of
loans.
65
Of the total gross loan portfolio of $12.6 billion as of June 30, 2010, approximately 83% has
credit risk concentration in Puerto Rico, 8% in the United States (mainly in the state of Florida)
and 9% in the Virgin Islands, as shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto |
|
|
Virgin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010 |
|
Rico |
|
|
Islands |
|
|
Florida |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Residential mortgage loans, including
loans held for sale |
|
$ |
2,790,906 |
|
|
$ |
442,275 |
|
|
$ |
349,612 |
|
|
$ |
3,582,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction loans (1) |
|
|
923,015 |
|
|
|
195,511 |
|
|
|
191,539 |
|
|
|
1,310,065 |
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
1,130,552 |
|
|
|
69,313 |
|
|
|
465,686 |
|
|
|
1,665,551 |
|
Commercial and Industrial loans |
|
|
3,615,063 |
|
|
|
286,073 |
|
|
|
30,855 |
|
|
|
3,931,991 |
|
Loans to local financial institutions
collateralized by real estate mortgages |
|
|
304,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans |
|
|
5,972,800 |
|
|
|
550,897 |
|
|
|
688,080 |
|
|
|
7,211,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance leases |
|
|
299,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
1,393,973 |
|
|
|
84,319 |
|
|
|
31,816 |
|
|
|
1,510,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
10,456,739 |
|
|
$ |
1,077,491 |
|
|
$ |
1,069,508 |
|
|
$ |
12,603,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Construction loans of Florida operations include approximately $53.3 million of
condo-conversion loans |
Loan Production
First BanCorp relies primarily on its retail network of branches to originate residential and
consumer loans. The Corporation supplements its residential mortgage originations with wholesale
servicing released mortgage loan purchases from mortgage bankers. The Corporation manages its
construction and commercial loan originations through centralized units and most of its
originations come from existing customers as well as through referrals and direct solicitations.
For commercial loan originations, the Corporation also has regional offices to provide services to
designated territories.
Total loan production, including purchases, refinancings and draws from existing commitments,
for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2010 was $651.0 million and $1.3 billion,
respectively, compared to $900.4 million and $2.2 billion, respectively, for the comparable periods
in 2009. The decrease in loan production for 2010 was mainly associated with the reduction in
credit facilities extended to the Puerto Rico Government. During the first half of 2010, credit
facilities to the Puerto Rico government amounted to $71.8 million compared to approximately $532.5
million for the comparable period in 2009. Originations in 2009 included a $500 million facility
extended to the Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp. (COFINA under its Spanish acronym), an
instrumentality of the Government of Puerto Rico that has already been repaid and a $115 million
refinancing of a commercial relationship. Other decreases were observed in construction loan
originations due to the Corporations strategic decision to reduce its exposure to construction
projects in both Puerto Rico and the United States markets. Despite the present economic climate,
the Corporation increased its consumer originations, mainly auto financings, which is a positive
indicator of a potential recovery of the Puerto Rico economy.
The following table details First BanCorps loan production, including purchases and
refinancings, for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six-month Period Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Residential real estate |
|
$ |
140,216 |
|
|
$ |
181,082 |
|
|
$ |
266,888 |
|
|
$ |
323,938 |
|
C&I and commercial mortgage |
|
|
313,970 |
|
|
|
410,565 |
|
|
|
618,905 |
|
|
|
1,293,457 |
|
Construction |
|
|
46,495 |
|
|
|
159,896 |
|
|
|
97,348 |
|
|
|
257,022 |
|
Finance leases |
|
|
21,206 |
|
|
|
20,228 |
|
|
|
44,256 |
|
|
|
39,822 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
129,112 |
|
|
|
128,643 |
|
|
|
260,595 |
|
|
|
253,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loan production |
|
$ |
650,999 |
|
|
$ |
900,414 |
|
|
$ |
1,287,992 |
|
|
$ |
2,167,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Real Estate Loans
As of June 30, 2010, the Corporations residential real estate loan portfolio decreased by
$33.5 million as compared to the balance as of December 31, 2009. More than 90% of the
Corporations outstanding balance of residential mortgage loans consists of fixed-rate, fully
amortizing, full documentation loans. In accordance with the Corporations underwriting
guidelines, residential real estate loans are mostly fully documented loans, and the Corporation is
not actively involved in the origination of negative amortization loans or adjustable-rate mortgage
loans. The decrease was a combination of loan sales and securitizations that in aggregate amounted
to $145.8 million, charge-offs of $31.0 million and pay downs and foreclosures. Residential loan
originations were lower compared to 2009 as a result of the weak
66
economic environment in Puerto Rico, reflected in high unemployment rates. Refer to the
Contractual Obligations and Commitments discussion below for additional information about
outstanding commitments to sell mortgage loans.
Commercial and Construction Loans
As of June 30, 2010, the Corporations commercial and construction loan portfolio decreased by
$1.2 billion, as compared to the balance as of December 31, 2009, due mainly to repayments of
approximately $1.1 billion from credit facilities extended to the Puerto Rico government and/or
political subdivisions combined with net charge-offs of $183.4 million, the sale of approximately
$83 million associated with three impaired loans in Florida and pay downs. The Corporations
commercial loans are primarily variable- and adjustable-rate loans.
As
of June 30, 2010, the Corporation had $167.3 million outstanding on credit facilities
granted to the Puerto Rico government and/or its political subdivisions, down from $1.2 billion as
of December 31, 2009, and $184.1 million granted to the Virgin Islands government. A substantial
portion of these credit facilities consists of obligations that have a specific source of income or
revenues identified for their repayment, such as property taxes collected by the central Government
and/or municipalities. Another portion of these obligations consists of loans to public
corporations that obtain revenues from rates charged for services or products, such as electric
power and water utilities. Public corporations have varying degrees of independence from the
central Government and many receive appropriations or other payments from it. The Corporation also
has loans to various municipalities in Puerto Rico for which the good faith, credit and unlimited
taxing power of the applicable municipality has been pledged to their repayment.
The largest loan to one borrower as of June 30, 2010 in the amount of $304.2 million is with
one mortgage originator in Puerto Rico, Doral Financial Corporation. This commercial loan is
secured by individual real estate loans, mostly 1-4 residential mortgage loans.
The Corporations construction lending volume has been stagnant for the last two years due to
the slowdown in the U.S. housing market and the current economic environment in Puerto Rico. The
Corporation has reduced its exposure to condo-conversion loans in its Florida operations and its
construction loan originations in Puerto Rico are mainly draws from existing commitments.
Approximately 97% of the construction loan originations in 2010 are related to disbursements from
previously established commitments and new loans are mainly associated with construction loans to
individuals. Current absorption rates in condo-conversion loans in the United States are low and
properties collateralizing some of these condo-conversion loans have been formally reverted to
rental properties with a future plan for the sale of converted units upon an improvement in the
real estate market. As of June 30, 2010, loans outstanding originally disbursed as condo-conversion
construction loans of approximately $30.6 million have been formally reverted to income-producing
commercial loans, while the repayment of interest on the remaining $53.3 million construction
condo-conversion loans is coming principally from rental income and other sources. In Puerto Rico,
absorption rates on low income residential projects financed by the Corporation showed signs of
improvement during 2010 but the market is still under pressure because of an oversupply of housing
units compounded by a lower demand and diminished consumer purchasing power and confidence. The
unemployment rate in Puerto Rico tops 16%.
The construction loan portfolio in Puerto Rico decreased by $75.2 million during the first
half of 2010 driven by charge-offs of $54.5 million. In Florida the construction portfolio
decreased by $108.0 million, also driven by charge-offs of $41.8 million recorded during the first
half of 2010 and the sale of a $52 million non-performing loan.
67
The composition of the Corporations construction loan portfolio as of June 30, 2010 by
category and geographic location follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto |
|
|
Virgin |
|
|
United |
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010 |
|
Rico |
|
|
Islands |
|
|
States |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Loans for residential housing projects: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High-rise (1) |
|
$ |
191,599 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
191,599 |
|
Mid-rise (2) |
|
|
81,877 |
|
|
|
4,912 |
|
|
|
19,599 |
|
|
|
106,388 |
|
Single-family detached |
|
|
109,712 |
|
|
|
2,844 |
|
|
|
20,752 |
|
|
|
133,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total for residential housing projects |
|
|
383,188 |
|
|
|
7,756 |
|
|
|
40,351 |
|
|
|
431,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction loans to individuals secured by residential
properties |
|
|
11,804 |
|
|
|
21,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,863 |
|
Condo-conversion loans |
|
|
11,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,271 |
|
|
|
64,988 |
|
Loans for commercial projects |
|
|
297,444 |
|
|
|
119,213 |
|
|
|
1,540 |
|
|
|
418,197 |
|
Bridge loans residential |
|
|
56,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,170 |
|
|
|
62,151 |
|
Bridge loans commercial |
|
|
3,003 |
|
|
|
25,951 |
|
|
|
13,905 |
|
|
|
42,859 |
|
Land loans residential |
|
|
73,719 |
|
|
|
19,064 |
|
|
|
55,789 |
|
|
|
148,572 |
|
Land loans commercial |
|
|
79,451 |
|
|
|
2,126 |
|
|
|
21,575 |
|
|
|
103,152 |
|
Working capital |
|
|
8,865 |
|
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total before net deferred fees and allowance for loan
losses |
|
|
926,172 |
|
|
|
196,194 |
|
|
|
191,601 |
|
|
|
1,313,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred fees |
|
|
(3,157 |
) |
|
|
(683 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(3,902 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total construction loan portfolio, gross |
|
|
923,015 |
|
|
|
195,511 |
|
|
|
191,539 |
|
|
|
1,310,065 |
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(107,116 |
) |
|
|
(28,242 |
) |
|
|
(63,722 |
) |
|
|
(199,080 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total construction loan portfolio, net |
|
$ |
815,899 |
|
|
$ |
167,269 |
|
|
$ |
127,817 |
|
|
$ |
1,110,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For purposes of the above table, high-rise portfolio is composed of buildings with more than 7
stories, mainly composed of three projects that represent approximately 87% of the Corporations
total outstanding high-rise residential construction loan portfolio in Puerto Rico. |
|
(2) |
|
Mid-rise relates to buildings having up to 7 stories. |
The following table presents further information on the Corporations construction
portfolio as of and for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Total undisbursed funds under existing commitments |
|
$ |
192,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction loans in non-accrual status |
|
$ |
621,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge offs Construction loans (1) |
|
$ |
96,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses Construction loans |
|
$ |
199,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing construction loans to total construction loans |
|
|
47.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses construction loans to total construction loans |
|
|
15.20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs (annualized) to total average construction loans |
|
|
13.17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes charge-offs of $54.5 million related to construction loans in Puerto Rico and $41.8 million related to construction loans in Florida. |
68
The following summarizes the construction loans for residential housing projects in
Puerto Rico segregated by the estimated selling price of the units:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Under $300K |
|
$ |
90,095 |
|
$300K-$600K |
|
|
180,128 |
|
Over $600K (1) |
|
|
112,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
383,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mainly composed of two high-rise projects and two single-family detached projects that account
for approximately 48% and 30%, respectively, of the residential housing projects in Puerto Rico
with selling prices over $600k. |
For the majority of the construction loans for residential housing projects in Florida,
the estimated selling price of the units is under $300,000.
Consumer Loans and Finance Leases
As of June 30, 2010, the Corporations consumer loan and finance leases portfolio decreased by
$88.9 million, as compared to the portfolio balance as of December 31, 2009. This is mainly the
result of repayments and charge-offs that on a combined basis more than offset the volume of loan
originations during the first half of 2010. Nevertheless, the Corporation experienced a decrease
in net charge-offs for consumer loans and finance leases that amounted to $27.3 million for the
first half of 2010, as compared to $30.6 million for the same period a year ago.
Consumer loan originations are principally driven through the Corporations retail network.
For the first half of 2010, consumer loan originations increased by $7.6 million compared to the
same period in 2009, mainly in auto financings.
Investment Activities
As part of its strategy to diversify its revenue sources and maximize its net interest income,
First BanCorp maintains an investment portfolio that is classified as available-for-sale or
held-to-maturity. The Corporations available-for-sale and held-to-maturity portfolio as of June
30, 2010 amounted to $4.5 billion, a reduction of $284.2 million when compared to $4.8 billion as
of December 31, 2009. The reduction was the net result of approximately $800 million of MBS sold
during the first half of 2010 (mainly U.S. agency MBS) with a weighted average yield of 5.24%, $252
million of U.S. Treasury Notes sold with a weighted average yield of 2.84%, the call of
approximately $951 million of investment securities (mainly U.S. agency debt securities) with a
weighted average yield of 2.10% and MBS prepayments, partially offset by the purchase of
approximately $850 million in aggregate of 2,3,5 and 7 year U.S. Treasury Notes with an average
yield of 1.82%, the purchase of approximately $549 million of debt securities (mainly 2-3-year U.S.
agency debt securities) with a yield of 1.59% and the purchase of $524 million of MBS with a
weighted-average yield of 3.85%.
Over 94% of the Corporations available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities portfolio is
invested in U.S. Government and Agency debentures and fixed-rate U.S. government sponsored-agency
MBS (mainly FNMA and FHLMC fixed-rate securities). The Corporations investment in equity
securities is minimal, approximately $0.1 million, which consists of common stock of a financial
institution in Puerto Rico.
69
The following table presents the carrying value of investments at the indicated dates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Money market investments |
|
$ |
22,044 |
|
|
$ |
24,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities held to maturity, at amortized cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and agencies obligations |
|
|
16,975 |
|
|
|
8,480 |
|
Puerto Rico Government obligations |
|
|
23,659 |
|
|
|
23,579 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
490,668 |
|
|
|
567,560 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
533,302 |
|
|
|
601,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and agencies obligations |
|
|
1,298,867 |
|
|
|
1,145,139 |
|
Puerto Rico Government obligations |
|
|
138,437 |
|
|
|
136,326 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
2,517,502 |
|
|
|
2,889,014 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,954,910 |
|
|
|
4,170,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other equity securities, including $68.5 million and $68.4 million |
|
|
69,843 |
|
|
|
69,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of FHLB stock as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
|
$ |
4,580,099 |
|
|
$ |
4,866,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities at the indicated dates consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC certificates |
|
$ |
3,691 |
|
|
$ |
5,015 |
|
FNMA certificates |
|
|
486,977 |
|
|
|
562,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
490,668 |
|
|
|
567,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC certificates |
|
|
333,420 |
|
|
|
722,249 |
|
GNMA certificates |
|
|
922,341 |
|
|
|
418,312 |
|
FNMA certificates |
|
|
1,053,763 |
|
|
|
1,507,792 |
|
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations issued or guaranteed by FHLMC, FNMA and GNMA |
|
|
127,120 |
|
|
|
156,307 |
|
Other mortgage pass-through certificates |
|
|
80,858 |
|
|
|
84,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,517,502 |
|
|
|
2,889,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
3,008,170 |
|
|
$ |
3,456,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
The carrying values of investment securities classified as available-for-sale and
held-to-maturity as of June 30, 2010 by contractual maturity (excluding mortgage-backed securities
and equity securities) are shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Weighted |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Average Yield % |
|
U.S. Government and agencies obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year |
|
$ |
16,975 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
1,298,867 |
|
|
|
1.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,315,842 |
|
|
|
1.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Government obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year |
|
|
12,002 |
|
|
|
1.78 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
113,713 |
|
|
|
5.40 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
26,388 |
|
|
|
5.87 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
9,993 |
|
|
|
5.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162,096 |
|
|
|
5.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
5.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
5.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,479,938 |
|
|
|
1.94 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
3,008,170 |
|
|
|
4.11 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available for sale and held to maturity |
|
$ |
4,488,212 |
|
|
|
3.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income of future periods will be affected by the Corporations decision to
deleverage its investment securities portfolio to preserve its capital position. Also, net
interest income could be affected by prepayments of mortgage-backed securities. Acceleration in
the prepayments of mortgage-backed securities would lower yields on these securities, as the
amortization of premiums paid upon acquisition of these securities would accelerate. Conversely,
acceleration in the prepayments of mortgage-backed securities would increase yields on securities
purchased at a discount, as the amortization of the discount would accelerate. These risks are
directly linked to future period market interest rate fluctuations. Also, net interest income in
future periods might be affected by the Corporations investment in callable securities.
Approximately $951 million of investment securities, mainly U.S. Agency debentures, with an average
yield of 2.10% were called during the first half of 2010. As of June 30, 2010, the Corporation has
approximately $392 million in debt securities (mainly U.S. agency securities) with embedded calls
and with an average yield of 2.26% (mainly securities with contractual maturities of 2 to 3 years).
However, the Corporation has been using proceeds from called securities and investing some of its
liquidity in the second quarter of 2010 through the purchase of approximately $1.9 billion of
investment securities. Refer to the Risk Management section below for further analysis of the
effects of changing interest rates on the Corporations net interest income and of the interest
rate risk management strategies followed by the Corporation. Also refer to Note 4 to the
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding the
Corporations investment portfolio.
RISK MANAGEMENT
Risks are inherent in virtually all aspects of the Corporations business activities and
operations. Consequently, effective risk management is fundamental to the success of the
Corporation. The primary goals of risk management are to ensure that the Corporations risk taking
activities are consistent with the Corporations objectives and risk tolerance and that there is an
appropriate balance between risk and reward in order to maximize stockholder value.
The Corporation has in place a risk management framework to monitor, evaluate and manage the
principal risks assumed in conducting its activities. First BanCorps business is subject to eight
broad categories of risks: (1) liquidity risk, (2) interest rate risk, (3) market risk, (4) credit
risk, (5) operational risk, (6) legal and compliance risk, (7) reputational risk, and (8)
contingency risk. First BanCorp has adopted policies and procedures designed to identify and manage
risks to which the Corporation is exposed, specifically those relating to liquidity risk, interest
rate risk, credit risk, and operational risk.
The Corporations risk management policies are described below as well as in the Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of First BanCorps
2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Liquidity and Capital Adequacy
Liquidity is the ongoing ability to accommodate liability maturities and deposit withdrawals,
fund asset growth and business operations, and meet contractual obligations through unconstrained
access to funding at reasonable market rates. Liquidity management involves forecasting funding
requirements and maintaining sufficient capacity to meet the needs for liquidity and accommodate
fluctuations in asset and liability levels due to changes in the Corporations business operations
or unanticipated events.
71
The Corporation manages liquidity at two levels. The first is the liquidity of the parent
company, which is the holding company that owns the banking and non-banking subsidiaries. The
second is the liquidity of the banking subsidiary. At June 30, 2010, FirstBank could not pay any
dividend to the parent company. The Asset and Liability Committee of the Board of Directors is
responsible for establishing the Corporations liquidity policy as well as approving operating and
contingency procedures, and monitoring liquidity on an ongoing basis. Managements Investment and
Asset Liability Committee (MIALCO), using measures of liquidity developed by management, which
involve the use of several assumptions, reviews the Corporations liquidity position on a monthly
basis. The MIALCO oversees liquidity management, interest rate risk and other related matters. The
MIALCO, which reports to the Board of Directors Asset and Liability Committee, is composed of
senior management officers, including the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the
Chief Risk Officer, the Retail Financial Services Director, the Risk Manager of the Treasury and
Investments Division, the Asset/Liability Manager and the Treasurer. The Treasury and Investments
Division is responsible for planning and executing the Corporations funding activities and
strategy, monitoring liquidity availability on a daily basis and reviewing liquidity measures on a
weekly basis. The Treasury and Investments Accounting and Operations area of the Comptrollers
Department is responsible for calculating the liquidity measurements used by the Treasury and
Investment Division to review the Corporations liquidity position.
In order to ensure adequate liquidity through the full range of potential operating
environments and market conditions, the Corporation conducts its liquidity management and business
activities in a manner that will preserve and enhance funding stability, flexibility and diversity.
Key components of this operating strategy include a strong focus on the continued development of
customer-based funding, the maintenance of direct relationships with wholesale market funding
providers, and the maintenance of the ability to liquidate certain assets when, and if,
requirements warrant.
The Corporation develops and maintains contingency funding plans. These plans evaluate the
Corporations liquidity position under various operating circumstances and allow the Corporation to
ensure that it will be able to operate through periods of stress when access to normal sources of
funds is constrained. The plans project funding requirements during a potential period of stress,
specify and quantify sources of liquidity, outline actions and procedures for effectively managing
through a difficult period, and define roles and responsibilities. In the Contingency Funding Plan,
the Corporation stresses the balance sheet and the liquidity position to critical levels that imply
difficulties in getting new funds or even maintaining its current funding position, thereby
ensuring the ability to honor its commitments, and establishing liquidity triggers monitored by the
MIALCO in order to maintain the ordinary funding of the banking business. Three different scenarios
are defined in the Contingency Funding Plan: local market event, credit rating downgrade, and a
concentration event. They are reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Directors Asset and
Liability Committee.
The Corporation manages its liquidity in a proactive manner, and maintains an adequate
position. Multiple measures are utilized to monitor the Corporations liquidity position,
including basic surplus and time-based reserve measures. The Corporation has maintained the basic
surplus (cash, short-term assets minus short-term liabilities, and secured lines of credit) well in
excess of the self-imposed minimum limit of 5% of total assets. As of June 30, 2010, the estimated
basic surplus ratio of approximately 10% included un-pledged investment securities, FHLB lines of
credit, and cash. At the end of the quarter, the Corporation had $242 million available of unused
secured credit to borrow from the FHLB. Un-pledged liquid securities as of June 30, 2010 mainly
consisted of fixed-rate U.S. agency debentures and MBS totaling approximately $1.0 billion. The
Corporation does not rely on uncommitted inter-bank lines of credit (federal funds lines) to fund
its operations and does not include them in the basic surplus computation. The Corporation does
not have any unsecured debt maturing during the remaining of 2010 and $3.5 billion of brokered CDs
maturing over the next twelve months. At June 30, 2010, the holding company had $52.6 million of
cash and cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents at the Bank as of June 30, 2010 were
approximately $544.8 million.
Sources of Funding
The Corporation utilizes different sources of funding to help ensure that adequate levels of
liquidity are available when needed. Diversification of funding sources is of great importance to
protect the Corporations liquidity from market disruptions. The principal sources of short-term
funds are deposits, including brokered CDs, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and
lines of credit with the FHLB. The Asset Liability Committee of the Board of Directors reviews
credit availability on a regular basis. The Corporation has also securitized and sold mortgage
loans as a supplementary source of funding. Commercial paper has also in the past provided
additional funding. Long-term funding has also been obtained through the issuance of notes and, to
a lesser extent, long-term brokered CDs. The cost of these different alternatives, among other
things, is taken into consideration.
The Corporation is in the process of deleveraging its balance sheet by reducing the amounts of
brokered CDs and during 2010 repaid the remaining balance of $900 million in FED advances
outstanding as of December 31, 2009. The reductions in brokered CDs are consistent with the
requirements of the Order that preclude the issuance of brokered CDs without FDIC approval. The
reductions in brokered CDs and FED advances are being partly offset by increases in retail and
business deposits. Brokered CDs decreased $455.6 million to $7.1 billion as of June 30, 2010 from
$7.6 billion as of December 31, 2010. At the same time, as the Corporation focuses on reducing its
reliance on brokered deposits, it is seeking to add core deposits. The re-payment of FED advances
has resulted in a reduction in excess liquidity as well as to the reduction in the size of the
balance sheet.
72
While liquidity is an ongoing challenge for all financial institutions, management believes
that the Corporations available borrowing capacity and efforts to grow deposits will be adequate
to provide the necessary funding for the 2010 business plans. Nevertheless, managements
alternative capital preservation strategies can be implemented should adverse liquidity conditions
arise. Refer to Capital discussion below for additional information about capital raising
efforts that would impact capital and liquidity levels.
The Corporations principal sources of funding are:
Brokered CDs A large portion of the Corporations funding has been retail brokered CDs issued
by the Bank subsidiary, FirstBank Puerto Rico. Total brokered CDs decreased from $7.6 billion at
year-end 2009 to $7.1 billion as of June 30, 2010. Although all the regulatory capital ratios
exceeded the established well capitalized levels at June 30, 2010, because of the Order with
the FDIC, FirstBank cannot be treated as a well capitalized institution under regulatory
guidance and cannot replace maturing brokered CDs without the prior approval of the FDIC. Since
the issuance of the Order, the FDIC has granted the Bank temporary waivers to enable it to
continue accessing the brokered deposit market through September 30, 2010. The Bank will request
approvals for future periods. The Corporation has been using proceeds from repayments and sales
of loans and investments to pay down maturing borrowings, including brokered CDs. Also, the
Corporation successfully implemented its core deposit growth strategy that resulted in an
increase of $514.1 million, or 10%, in non-brokered deposits during the first half of 2010.
The average remaining term to maturity of the retail brokered CDs outstanding as of June 30, 2010
is approximately 1.2 years. Approximately 3% of the principal value of these certificates is
callable at the Corporations option.
The use of brokered CDs has been particularly important for the growth of the Corporation. The
Corporation encounters intense competition in attracting and retaining regular retail deposits in
Puerto Rico. The brokered CDs market is very competitive and liquid, and the Corporation has
been able to obtain substantial amounts of funding in short periods of time. This strategy has
enhanced the Corporations liquidity position, since the brokered CDs are insured by the FDIC up
to regulatory limits and can be obtained faster compared to regular retail deposits. Should the
FDIC fail to approve waivers for the renewal of brokered CDs, the Corporation would have to
execute an accelerated de-leveraging through a systematic disposition of assets to meet its
liquidity needs. During the first half of 2010, the Corporation issued $2.5 billion in brokered
CDs to renew maturing brokered CDs having an average interest rate of 1.31%. Management believes
it will continue to obtain waivers from the restrictions in the issuance of brokered CDs under
the Order to meet its obligations and execute its business plans.
The following table presents a maturity summary of brokered and retail CDs with
denominations of $100,000 or higher as of June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
Three months or less |
|
$ |
1,272,795 |
|
Over three months to six months |
|
|
1,390,571 |
|
Over six months to one year |
|
|
1,457,290 |
|
Over one year |
|
|
4,071,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,191,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit in denominations of $100,000 or higher include brokered CDs of $7.1
billion issued to deposit brokers in the form of large ($100,000 or more) certificates of deposit
that are generally participated out by brokers in shares of less than $100,000 and are therefore
insured by the FDIC. Certificates of deposit also include $22.2 million of deposits through the
Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS). In an effort to meet customer needs and
provide its customers with the best products and services available, the Corporations bank
subsidiary, FirstBank Puerto Rico, has joined a program that gives depositors the opportunity to
insure their money beyond the standard FDIC coverage. CDARS can offer customers access to FDIC
insurance coverage beyond the $250 thousand per account without limit by placing deposit in
multiple banks through a single bank gateway, when they enter into the CDARS Deposit Placement
Agreement, while earning attractive returns on their deposits.
Retail deposits The Corporations deposit products also include regular savings accounts, demand
deposit accounts, money market accounts and retail CDs. Total deposits, excluding brokered CDs,
increased by $514.1 million to $5.6 billion from the balance of $5.1 billion as of December 31,
2009, reflecting increases in core-deposit products such as money market, savings, retail CDs and
interest-bearing checking accounts. A significant portion of the increase was related to increases
in money market accounts and retail CDs in Florida. Successful marketing campaigns and attractive
rates were the main reason for the increase in Florida. Refer to Note 11 in the accompanying
unaudited financial statements for further details.
73
Refer to the Net Interest Income discussion above for information about average balances of
interest-bearing deposits, and the average interest rate paid on deposits for the quarter and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase The Corporations investment portfolio is
substantially funded with repurchase agreements. Securities sold under repurchase agreements were
$2.6 billion as of June 30, 2010, compared with $3.1 billion as of December 31, 2009. The decrease
relates to the Corporations decision to deleverage its balance sheet by paying down maturing
short-term repurchase agreements. One of the Corporations strategies has been the use of
structured repurchase agreements and long-term repurchase agreements to reduce exposure to interest
rate risk by lengthening the final maturities of its liabilities while keeping funding costs at
reasonable levels. Of the total of $2.6 billion repurchase agreements outstanding as of June 30,
2010, approximately $2.0 billion consist of structured repurchase agreements (repos) and $400
million of long-term repos. The access to this type of funding was affected by the liquidity
turmoil in the financial markets witnessed in the second half of 2008 and in 2009. Certain
counterparties are still not willing to extend the term of maturing repurchase agreements.
Nevertheless, in addition to short-term repos, the Corporation has been able to maintain access to
credit by using cost-effective sources such as FED and FHLB advances. Refer to Note 13 in the
accompanying notes to the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements for further details
about repurchase agreements outstanding by counterparty and maturities.
Under the Corporations repurchase agreements, as is the case with derivative contracts, the
Corporation is required to deposit cash or qualifying securities to meet margin requirements. To
the extent that the value of securities previously pledged as collateral declines because of
changes in interest rates, a liquidity crisis or any other factor, the Corporation will be required
to deposit additional cash or securities to meet its margin requirements, thereby adversely
affecting its liquidity. Given the quality of the collateral pledged, the Corporation has not
experienced significant margin calls from counterparties arising from credit-quality-related
write-downs in valuations with only $0.4 million of cash deposited in connection with
collateralized interest rate swap agreements.
Advances from the FHLB The Corporations Bank subsidiary is a member of the FHLB system and
obtains advances to fund its operations under a collateral agreement with the FHLB that requires
the Bank to maintain qualifying mortgages as collateral for advances taken. As of June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, the outstanding balance of FHLB advances was $940.4 million and $978.4 million,
respectively. Approximately $520.4 million of outstanding advances from the FHLB has maturities of
over one year. As part of its precautionary initiatives to safeguard access to credit and the low
level of interest rates, the Corporation has been pledging assets with the FHLB while at the same
time the FHLB has been revising its credit guidelines and haircuts in the computation of
availability of credit lines.
FED Discount window During 2009, the FED encouraged banks to borrow from the Discount Window in
an effort to restore liquidity and calm to the credit markets. As market conditions improved,
participating financial institutions have been asked to shift to regular funding sources, and repay
borrowings such as advances from the FED Discount Window. During the first half of 2010, the
Corporation repaid the remaining balance of $900 million in FED advances outstanding as of December
31, 2009.
Credit Lines The Corporation maintains unsecured and un-committed lines of credit with other
banks. As of June 30, 2010, the Corporations total unused lines of credit with other banks
amounted to $165 million. The Corporation has not used these lines of credit to fund its
operations.
Though currently not in use, other sources of short-term funding for the Corporation include
commercial paper and federal funds purchased. Furthermore, in previous years the Corporation
entered into several financing transactions to diversify its funding sources, including the
issuance of notes payable and junior subordinated debentures as part of its longer-term liquidity
and capital management activities. No assurance can be given that these sources of liquidity will
be available and, if available, that they will be on acceptable comparable terms.
The Corporations principal uses of funds are the origination of loans and the repayment of
maturing deposits and borrowings. The Corporation has committed substantial resources to its
mortgage banking subsidiary, FirstMortgage Inc. As a result, residential real estate loans as a
percentage of total loans receivable have increased over time from 14% at December 31, 2004 to 28%
at June 30, 2010. Commensurate with the increase in its mortgage banking activities, the
Corporation has also invested in technology and personnel to enhance the Corporations secondary
mortgage market capabilities. The enhanced capabilities improve the Corporations liquidity profile
as they allow the Corporation to derive liquidity, if needed, from the sale of mortgage loans in
the secondary market. The U.S. (including Puerto Rico) secondary mortgage market is still highly
liquid in large part because of the sale or guarantee programs of the FHA, VA, HUD, FNMA and FHLMC.
The Corporation obtained Commitment Authority to issue GNMA mortgage-backed securities from GNMA
and, under this program, the Corporation completed the securitization of approximately $105 million
of FHA/VA mortgage loans into GNMA MBS during 2010. Any regulatory actions affecting GNMA, FNMA or
FHLMC could adversely affect the secondary mortgage market.
74
Impact of Credit Ratings on Access to Liquidity and Valuation of Liabilities
The Corporations credit as a long-term issuer is currently rated CCC+ by Standard & Poors
(S&P) and B- by Fitch Ratings Limited (Fitch); both with negative outlook. At the FirstBank
subsidiary level, long-term issuer rating is currently B3 by Moodys Investor Service (Moodys),
six notches below their definition of investment grade; CCC+ by S&P seven notches below their
definition of investment grade, and B- by Fitch, six notches below their definition of investment
grade. The outlook on the Banks credit ratings from the three rating agencies is negative.
During the second quarter of 2010, the Corporation and its subsidiary bank suffered credit
rating downgrades from Moodys (B1 to B3), S&P (B to CCC+), and Fitch (B to B-) rating services.
Furthermore, on June 2010 Moodys and Fitch placed the Corporation on Credit Watch Negative and
S&P placed a Negative Outlook. The Corporation does not have any outstanding debt or derivative
agreements that would be affected by the recent credit downgrades. Furthermore, given our
non-reliance on corporate debt or other instruments directly linked in terms of pricing or volume
to credit ratings, the liquidity of the Corporation so far has not been affected in any material
way by the downgrades. The Corporations ability to access new non-deposit sources of funding,
however, could be adversely affected by these credit ratings and any additional downgrades.
The Corporations liquidity, however, is contingent upon its ability to obtain new external
sources of funding to finance its operations. The Corporations current credit ratings and any
further downgrades in credit ratings can hinder the Corporations access to external funding and/or
cause external funding to be more expensive, which could in turn adversely affect the results of
operations. Also, changes in credit ratings may further affect the fair value of certain
liabilities and unsecured derivatives that consider the Corporations own credit risk as part of
the valuation.
Cash Flows
Cash and cash equivalents were $545.1 million and $247.8 million at June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. These balances decreased by $159.0 million and $157.9 million from December 31, 2009
and 2008, respectively. The following discussion highlights the major activities and transactions
that affected the Corporations cash flows during the first half of 2010 and 2009.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
First BanCorps operating assets and liabilities vary significantly in the normal course of
business due to the amount and timing of cash flows. Management believes cash flows from
operations, available cash balances and the Corporations ability to generate cash through short-
and long-term borrowings will be sufficient to fund the Corporations operating liquidity needs.
For
the first half of 2010, net cash provided by operating activities was
$111.4 million. Net
cash generated from operating activities was higher than net loss reported largely as a result of
adjustments for operating items such as the provision for loan and lease losses partially offset by
adjustments to net income from the gain on sale of investments.
For the first half of 2009, net cash provided by operating activities was $127.2 million,
which was higher than net loss reported largely as a result of adjustments for operating items such
as the provision for loan and lease losses.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
The Corporations investing activities primarily include originating loans to be held to
maturity and its available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment portfolios. For the first half
of 2010, net cash provided by investing activities was $1.1 billion, primarily reflecting
proceeds from loans, as well as proceeds from securities sold or called during the first half of
2010 and MBS prepayments. Partially offsetting these sources of cash were cash used for loan
origination disbursements and certain purchases of available-for-sale securities, as discussed
above.
For the first half of 2009, net cash used in investing activities was $738.7 million,
primarily for loan origination disbursements and purchases of available-for-sale investment
securities to mitigate in part the impact of investment securities called by counterparties prior
to maturity and MBS prepayments.
75
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
The Corporations financing activities include primarily the receipt of deposits and issuance
of brokered CDs, the issuance and repayments of long-term debt, the issuance of equity instruments
and activities related to its short-term funding. In addition, the Corporation paid monthly
dividends on its preferred stock and quarterly dividends on its common stock until it announced the
suspension of dividends beginning in August 2009. In the first half of 2010, net cash used in
financing activities was $1.4 billion due to the Corporations decision to deleverage its balance
sheet and pay down maturing repurchase agreements as well as advances from the FHLB and the FED.
Partially offsetting these cash reductions was the growth of the core deposit base.
In the first half of 2009, net cash provided by financing activities was $453.6 million due to
the investment of $400 million by the U.S. Treasury in preferred stock of the Corporation through
the U.S. Treasury TARP Capital Purchase Program and due to the use of the FED Discount Window
Program, advances from the FHLB and short-term repurchase agreements to refinance brokered CDs at a
lower cost and finance the Corporations investing activities. Partially offsetting these cash
proceeds was the payment of cash dividends and pay down of maturing borrowings, in particular
brokered CDs.
Capital
The Corporations stockholders equity amounted to $1.4 billion as of June 30, 2010, a
decrease of $160.8 million compared to the balance as of December 31, 2009, driven by the net loss
of $197.6 million for the first half of 2010, partially offset by an increase in accumulated other
comprehensive income of $36.8 million related to changes in the fair value of investment
securities. As previously reported, the Corporation decided to suspend the payment of common and
preferred dividends, effective with the preferred dividend for the month of August 2009. Based on
the Agreement with the FED, currently neither First BanCorp nor FirstBank, are permitted to pay dividends on capital securities without prior
approval.
Effective June 2, 2010, FirstBank, by and through its Board of Directors, entered into the
Order with the FDIC (see Description of Business). Although all the regulatory capital ratios
exceeded the established well capitalized levels at June 30, 2010, because of the Order with the
FDIC, FirstBank cannot be treated as a well capitalized institution under regulatory guidance.
Set forth below are First BanCorps, and FirstBank Puerto Ricos regulatory capital ratios as of
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, based on existing established FED and FDIC guidelines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking Subsidiary |
|
|
First |
|
|
|
|
|
To be well |
|
|
BanCorp |
|
FirstBank |
|
capitalized |
As of June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital (Total capital to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
13.35 |
% |
|
|
12.83 |
% |
|
|
10.00 |
% |
Tier 1 capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
12.05 |
% |
|
|
11.53 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Leverage ratio |
|
|
8.14 |
% |
|
|
7.79 |
% |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital (Total capital to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
13.44 |
% |
|
|
12.87 |
% |
|
|
10.00 |
% |
Tier 1 capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
12.16 |
% |
|
|
11.70 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Leverage ratio |
|
|
8.91 |
% |
|
|
8.53 |
% |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
The decrease in regulatory capital ratios is mainly related to the net loss reported for
the first six months of 2010 that was almost entirely offset by the decrease in risk-weighted
assets consistent with the Corporations decision to deleverage its balance sheet to preserve its
capital position. Significant decreases in risk-weighted assets have been achieved mainly through
the non renewal of commercial loans with 100% risk weightings, such as temporary loan facilities to
the Puerto Rico government and others, and through the charge-offs of portions of loans deemed
uncollectible. Also, a reduced volume of loan originations contributed to mitigate, to some
extent, the effect of net losses on capital ratios.
The Corporations tangible common equity ratio was 2.57% as of June 30, 2010, compared to
3.20% as of December 31, 2009, and the Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio as of
June 30, 2010 was 2.86% compared to 4.10% as of December 31, 2009.
The tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per common share are non-GAAP
measures generally used by financial analysts and investment bankers to evaluate capital adequacy.
Tangible common equity is total equity less preferred equity, goodwill and core deposit
intangibles. Tangible assets are total assets less goodwill and core deposit intangibles.
Management and many stock analysts use the tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per
common share in conjunction with more traditional bank capital ratios to compare the capital
adequacy of banking organizations with significant amounts of goodwill or other intangible assets,
typically stemming from the use of the purchase accounting method of accounting for mergers and
acquisitions. Neither tangible
76
common equity nor tangible assets or related measures should be considered in isolation or as a
substitute for stockholders equity, total assets or any other measure calculated in accordance
with GAAP. Moreover, the manner in which the Corporation calculates its tangible common equity,
tangible assets and any other related measures may differ from that of other companies reporting
measures with similar names.
The following table is a reconciliation of the Corporations tangible common equity and
tangible assets for the periods ended June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Tangible Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity GAAP |
|
$ |
1,438,289 |
|
|
$ |
1,599,063 |
|
Preferred equity |
|
|
(930,830 |
) |
|
|
(928,508 |
) |
Goodwill |
|
|
(28,098 |
) |
|
|
(28,098 |
) |
Core deposit intangible |
|
|
(15,303 |
) |
|
|
(16,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common equity |
|
$ |
464,058 |
|
|
$ |
625,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets GAAP |
|
$ |
18,116,023 |
|
|
$ |
19,628,448 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(28,098 |
) |
|
|
(28,098 |
) |
Core deposit intangible |
|
|
(15,303 |
) |
|
|
(16,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible assets |
|
$ |
18,072,622 |
|
|
$ |
19,583,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding |
|
|
92,542 |
|
|
|
92,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common equity ratio |
|
|
2.57 |
% |
|
|
3.20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible book value per common share |
|
$ |
5.01 |
|
|
$ |
6.76 |
|
The Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio is calculated by dividing (a) Tier
1 capital less non-common elements including qualifying perpetual preferred stock and qualifying
trust preferred securities, by (b) risk-weighted assets, which assets are calculated in accordance
with applicable bank regulatory requirements. The Tier 1 common equity ratio is not required by
GAAP or on a recurring basis by applicable bank regulatory requirements. However, this ratio was
used by the Federal Reserve in connection with its stress test administered to the 19 largest U.S.
bank holding companies under the Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (SCAP), the results of
which were announced on May 7, 2009. Management is currently monitoring this ratio, along with the
other ratios discussed above, in evaluating the Corporations capital levels and believes that, at
this time, the ratio may continue to be of interest to investors.
77
The following table reconciles stockholders equity (GAAP) to Tier 1 common equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Tier 1 Common Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity GAAP |
|
$ |
1,438,289 |
|
|
$ |
1,599,063 |
|
Qualifying preferred stock |
|
|
(930,830 |
) |
|
|
(928,508 |
) |
Unrealized (gain) loss on available-for-sale securities (1) |
|
|
(63,311 |
) |
|
|
(26,617 |
) |
Disallowed deferred tax asset (2) |
|
|
(38,078 |
) |
|
|
(11,827 |
) |
Goodwill |
|
|
(28,098 |
) |
|
|
(28,098 |
) |
Core deposit intangible |
|
|
(15,303 |
) |
|
|
(16,600 |
) |
Cumulative change gain in fair value of liabilities
accounted for under a fair value option |
|
|
(3,170 |
) |
|
|
(1,535 |
) |
Other disallowed assets |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 common equity |
|
$ |
359,433 |
|
|
$ |
585,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-weighted assets |
|
$ |
12,570,330 |
|
|
$ |
14,303,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio |
|
|
2.86 |
% |
|
|
4.10 |
% |
|
|
|
1- |
|
Tier 1 capital excludes net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt
securities and net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily
determinable fair values, in accordance with regulatory risk-based capital guidelines. In arriving
at Tier 1 capital, institutions are required to deduct net unrealized losses on available-for-sale
equity securities with readily determinable fair values, net of tax. |
|
2- |
|
Approximately $71 million of the Corporations deferred tax assets at June 30, 2010 (December
31, 2009 $102 million) were included without limitation in regulatory capital pursuant to the
risk-based capital guidelines, while approximately $38 million of such assets at June 30, 2010
(December 31, 2009 $12 million) exceeded the limitation imposed by these guidelines and, as
disallowed deferred tax assets, were deducted in arriving at Tier 1 capital. According to
regulatory capital guidelines, the deferred tax assets that are dependent upon future taxable
income are limited for inclusion in Tier 1 capital to the lesser of: (i) the amount of such
deferred tax asset that the entity expects to realize within one year of the calendar quarter
end-date, based on its projected future taxable income for that year or (ii) 10% of the amount of
the entitys Tier 1 capital. Approximately $12 million of the Corporations other net deferred tax
liability at June 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 $5 million) represented primarily the deferred tax
effects of unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities, which are permitted
to be excluded prior to deriving the amount of net deferred tax assets subject to limitation under
the guidelines. |
Pursuant to the Order with the FDIC and the Agreement with the FED, the Corporation and
FirstBank have agreed to take certain actions designed to improve their financial condition. These
actions include the adoption and implementation of various plans, procedures and policies related
to their capital, lending activities, liquidity and funds management and strategy. In addition, the
Order requires FirstBank to develop and adopt a plan to achieve over time a leverage ratio of at
least 8%, a Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of at least 10% and a Total capital to
risk-weighted assets ratio of at least 12%.
The Corporation submitted capital plans to the FED and the FDIC setting forth how the
Corporation and FirstBank plan to improve their capital positions to comply with the Agreements
over time. The Corporation already announced that it has commenced an offer to exchange (the
Exchange Offer) up to 256,401,610 newly issued shares of its common stock for any and all of the
issued and outstanding shares of Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series A
through E (the Preferred Stock). In addition to this exchange offer, the Corporation has been
taking steps to implement strategies to increase tangible common equity and regulatory capital
through (i) the issuance of approximately $500 million of equity in one or more public or private
offerings, (ii) the conversion into common stock of the shares of Series G Preferred Stock that the
Corporation issued to the U.S. Treasury on July 20, 2010 in exchange for the Series F Preferred
Stock that the Corporation sold to it on January 16, 2009, and (iii) a rights offering to common
stockholders. Also, the Corporation has continued to deleverage its balance sheet by reducing
amounts of brokered CDs and borrowings. Such reductions were partially offset by increases in
retail and business deposits when comparing ending balances as of June 30, 2010 to balances as of
December 31, 2009.
Inability to complete the above mentioned Exchange Offer could hinder efforts to sell common
stock in a Capital Raise. If holders of $385 million or approximately 70% of the liquidation
preference of the Preferred Stock tender their shares of Preferred Stock in the Exchange Offer, the
Corporation raises $500 million of additional capital, and the holders of the Corporations common
stock approve amendments to the Articles of Incorporation, within nine months of the July 7, 2010
date of our agreement with the U.S. Treasury, the Corporation will meet the substantive conditions
necessary to compel the U.S. Treasury to convert into common stock the shares of recently issued
Series G Preferred Stock. Completing the Capital Plan initiatives would result in dilution to the
Corporations current stockholders. If the Corporation needs to continue to recognize significant
reserves and cannot complete a Capital Raise, the Corporation and FirstBank may not be able to
comply with the minimum capital requirements included in the capital plans required by the
Agreements. Nevertheless, if the Corporation is unable to complete the full capital raise, other
capital preservation strategies are contemplated, including among others, an accelerated deleverage
strategy and the divesture of profitable businesses, which could
78
allow us to meet the minimum capital requirements required by the Order. The Corporation
anticipates that it will need to continue to dedicate significant resources and efforts to comply
with these Agreements, which may increase operational costs or adversely affect the amount of time
management has to conduct operations.
Off -Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation engages in financial transactions that are
not recorded on the balance sheet, or may be recorded on the balance sheet in amounts that are
different from the full contract or notional amount of the transaction. These transactions are
designed to (1) meet the financial needs of customers, (2) manage the Corporations credit, market
or liquidity risks, (3) diversify the Corporations funding sources and (4) optimize capital.
As a provider of financial services, the Corporation routinely enters into commitments with
off-balance sheet risk to meet the financial needs of its customers. These financial instruments
may include loan commitments and standby letters of credit. These commitments are subject to the
same credit policies and approval process used for on-balance sheet instruments. These instruments
involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount
recognized in the statement of financial position. As of June 30, 2010, commitments to extend
credit and commercial and financial standby letters of credit amounted to approximately $1.1
billion and $81.8 million, respectively. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to
customers as long as the conditions established in the contract are met. Generally, the
Corporations mortgage banking activities do not enter into interest rate lock agreements with
prospective borrowers.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The following table presents a detail of the maturities of the Corporations contractual
obligations and commitments, which consist of CDs, long-term contractual debt obligations,
commitments to sell mortgage loans and commitments to extend credit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations and Commitments |
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Less than 1 year |
|
|
1-3 years |
|
|
3-5 years |
|
|
After 5 years |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Contractual obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit (1) |
|
$ |
8,968,560 |
|
|
$ |
4,540,885 |
|
|
$ |
4,048,250 |
|
|
$ |
365,108 |
|
|
$ |
14,317 |
|
Securities sold
under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
2,584,438 |
|
|
|
484,438 |
|
|
|
1,300,000 |
|
|
|
800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from FHLB |
|
|
940,440 |
|
|
|
420,000 |
|
|
|
462,000 |
|
|
|
58,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
|
24,059 |
|
|
|
7,152 |
|
|
|
6,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,504 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
231,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations |
|
$ |
12,749,456 |
|
|
$ |
5,452,475 |
|
|
$ |
5,816,653 |
|
|
$ |
1,223,548 |
|
|
$ |
256,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to sell mortgage loans |
|
$ |
47,061 |
|
|
$ |
47,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
$ |
81,788 |
|
|
$ |
81,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lines of credit |
|
$ |
890,065 |
|
|
$ |
890,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of credit |
|
|
46,155 |
|
|
|
46,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to originate loans |
|
|
195,617 |
|
|
|
195,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial commitments |
|
$ |
1,131,837 |
|
|
$ |
1,131,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $7.1 billion of brokered CDs sold by third-party intermediaries in denominations of
$100,000 or less, within FDIC insurance limits and $22.2 million in CDARS. |
The Corporation has obligations and commitments to make future payments under contracts,
such as debt and lease agreements, and under other commitments to sell mortgage loans at fair value
and to extend credit. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as
there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Other contractual obligations
result mainly from contracts for the rental and maintenance of equipment. Since certain commitments
are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily
represent future cash requirements. For most of the commercial lines of credit, the Corporation has
the option to reevaluate the agreement prior to additional disbursements. There have been no
significant or unexpected draws on existing commitments. In the case of credit cards and personal
lines of credit, the Corporation can cancel the unused credit facility at any time and without
cause. In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation enters into operating leases and other
commercial commitments. There have been no significant changes in such contractual obligations
since December 31, 2009.
Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. (Lehman) was the counterparty to the Corporation on
certain interest rate swap agreements. During the third quarter of 2008, Lehman failed to pay the
scheduled net cash settlement due to the Corporation, which constituted an event of default under
those interest rate swap agreements. The Corporation terminated all interest rate swaps with
79
Lehman and replaced them with other counterparties under similar terms and conditions. In
connection with the unpaid net cash settlement due as of June 30, 2010 under the swap agreements,
the Corporation has an unsecured counterparty exposure with Lehman, which filed for bankruptcy on
October 3, 2008, of approximately $1.4 million. This exposure was reserved in the third quarter of
2008. The Corporation had pledged collateral of $63.6 million with Lehman to guarantee its
performance under the swap agreements in the event payment thereunder was required. The book value
of pledged securities with Lehman as of June 30, 2010 amounted to approximately $64.5 million.
The Corporation believes that the securities pledged as collateral should not be part of the
Lehman bankruptcy estate given the facts that the posted collateral constituted a performance
guarantee under the swap agreements and was not part of a financing agreement, and ownership of the
securities was never transferred to Lehman. Upon termination of the interest rate swap agreements,
Lehmans obligation was to return the collateral to the Corporation. During the fourth quarter of
2009, the Corporation discovered that Lehman Brothers, Inc., acting as agent of Lehman, had
deposited the securities in a custodial account at JP Morgan/ Chase, and that, shortly before the
filing of the Lehman bankruptcy proceedings, it had provided instructions to have most of the
securities transferred to Barclays Capital in New York. After Barclays refusal to turn over the
securities, the Corporation, during the month of December 2009, filed a lawsuit against Barclays
Capital in federal court in New York demanding the return of the securities.
During the month of February 2010, Barclays filed a motion with the court requesting that the
Corporations claim be dismissed on the grounds that the allegations of the complaint are not
sufficient to justify the granting of the remedies therein sought. Shortly thereafter, the
Corporation filed its opposition motion. A hearing on the motions was held in court on April 28,
2010. The court on that date, after hearing the arguments by both sides, concluded that the
Corporations equitable-based causes of action, upon which the return of the investment securities
is being demanded, contain allegations that sufficiently plead facts warranting the denial of
Barclays motion to dismiss the Corporations claim. Accordingly, the judge ordered the case to
proceed to trial. The scheduling conference that had been set for
August 26, 2010, for purposes of having the parties agree on a
timetable for discovery has been temporarily suspended. The judge
decided to order the parties to submit to a mediation process prior
to a scheduling conference. While there have been preliminary
telephonic conversations with the appointed mediator, no formal
mediation sessions have been held. It is expected that within the
next 30 days the mediator will notice dated for mediation sessions. While the Corporation believes it has valid
reasons to support its claim for the return of the securities, no assurances can be given that it
will ultimately succeed in its litigation against Barclays Capital to recover all or a substantial
portion of the securities.
Additionally, the Corporation continues to pursue its claim filed in January 2009 in the
proceedings under the Securities Protection Act with regard to Lehman Brothers Incorporated in
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York. An estimated loss was not accrued as the
Corporation is unable to determine the timing of the claim resolution or whether it will succeed in
recovering all or a substantial portion of the collateral or its equivalent value. If additional
relevant negative facts become available in future periods, a need to recognize a partial or full
reserve of this claim may arise. Considering that the investment securities have not yet been
recovered by the Corporation, despite its efforts in this regard, the Corporation decided to
classify such investments as non-performing during the second quarter of 2009.
Interest Rate Risk Management
First BanCorp manages its asset/liability position in order to limit the effects of changes in
interest rates on net interest income and to maintain stability in the profitability under varying
interest rate environments. The MIALCO oversees interest rate risk and focuses on, among other
things, current and expected conditions in world financial markets, competition and prevailing
rates in the local deposit market, liquidity, securities market values, recent or proposed changes
to the investment portfolio, alternative funding sources and related costs, hedging and the
possible purchase of derivatives such as swaps and caps, and any tax or regulatory issues which may
be pertinent to these areas. The MIALCO approves funding decisions in light of the Corporations
overall growth strategies and objectives.
The Corporation performs on a quarterly basis a consolidated net interest income simulation
analysis to estimate the potential change in future earnings from projected changes in interest
rates. These simulations are carried out over a one-to five-year time horizon, assuming gradual
upward and downward interest rate movements of 200 basis points, achieved during a twelve-month
period. Simulations are carried out in two ways:
(1) using a static balance sheet prepared as of the simulation date, and
(2) using a dynamic balance sheet based on recent patterns and current strategies.
The balance sheet is divided into groups of assets and liabilities detailed by maturity or
re-pricing and their corresponding interest yields and costs. As interest rates rise or fall, these
simulations incorporate expected future lending rates, current and expected future funding sources
and costs, the possible exercise of options, changes in prepayment rates, deposits decay and other
factors that may be important in projecting the future growth of net interest income.
The Corporation uses a simulation model to project future movements in the Corporations
balance sheet and income statement. The starting point of the projections generally corresponds to
the actual values on the balance sheet on the date of the simulation.
80
These simulations are highly complex, and use many simplifying assumptions that are intended
to reflect the general behavior of the Corporation over the period in question. It is highly
unlikely that actual events will match these assumptions in all cases. For this reason, the results
of these simulations are only approximations of the true sensitivity of net interest income to
changes in market interest rates.
The following table presents the results of the simulations as of June 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009. Consistent with prior years, these exclude non-cash changes in the fair value of
derivatives and liabilities measured at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
Net Interest Income Risk (Projected for the next 12 months) |
|
Net Interest Income Risk (Projected for the next 12 months) |
|
|
Static Simulation |
|
Growing Balance Sheet |
|
Static Simulation |
|
Growing Balance Sheet |
(Dollars in millions) |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
+ 200 bps ramp |
|
$ |
33.6 |
|
|
|
6.82 |
% |
|
$ |
37.5 |
|
|
|
7.88 |
% |
|
$ |
10.6 |
|
|
|
2.16 |
% |
|
$ |
16.0 |
|
|
|
3.39 |
% |
- 200 bps ramp |
|
$ |
(29.3 |
) |
|
|
(5.93 |
)% |
|
$ |
(32.3 |
) |
|
|
(6.80 |
)% |
|
$ |
(31.9 |
) |
|
|
(6.53 |
)% |
|
$ |
(33.0 |
) |
|
|
(6.98 |
)% |
The Corporation continues to manage its balance sheet structure to control the overall
interest rate risk and preserve its capital position. As part of the overall strategy, the
Corporation continued to de-leverage its loan portfolio, reduce its long-term fixed-rate bullet and
callable investment securities, and increase shorter-duration investment securities. During the
first half of 2010, the loan portfolio decrease by $1.3 billion, largely attributable to repayments
on credit facilities extended to the Puerto Rico government. Also during that period,
approximately $1 billion of investment securities (mostly mortgage-backed securities) were sold,
while $951 million of US Agency debentures were called. Proceeds from repayments of loans and
investments have been used to pay down advances from the FED, maturing repurchase agreements and
brokered CDs, and acquire lower yielding and shorter-term securities. In addition, the Corporation
continues to adjust the mix of its funding sources to better match the expected average life of the
assets.
Taking into consideration the above-mentioned facts for modeling purposes, the net interest
income for the next twelve months under a non-static balance sheet scenario is estimated to
increase by $37.5 million in a gradual parallel upward move of 200 basis points. In accordance
with the Corporations risk management policies, modeling of the downward parallel rates moves by
anchoring the short end of the curve (falling rates with a flattening curve) was also performed,
even though, given the current level of rates as of June 30, 2010, some market interest rate were
projected to be zero. Under this scenario, where a considerable spread compression is projected,
net interest income for the next twelve months in a non-static balance sheet scenario is estimated
to decrease by $32.3 million.
Derivatives
First BanCorp uses derivative instruments and other strategies to manage its exposure to
interest rate risk caused by changes in interest rates beyond managements control.
The following summarizes major strategies, including derivative activities, used by the
Corporation in managing interest rate risk:
Interest rate cap agreements Interest rate cap agreements provide the right to receive
cash if a reference interest rate rises above a contractual rate. The value increases as the
reference interest rate rises. The Corporation enters into interest rate cap agreements for
protection from rising interest rates. Specifically, the interest rate on certain private label
mortgage pass-through securities and certain of the Corporations commercial loans to other
financial institutions is generally a variable rate limited to the weighted-average coupon of the
pass-through certificate or referenced residential mortgage collateral, less a contractual
servicing fee. During the second quarter of 2010, the counterparty for interest rate caps for
certain private label mortgage pass-through securities was taken over by the FDIC, immediately
canceling all outstanding commitments. Interest rate caps with a notional amount of $117 million
are no longer considered to be derivative financial instruments. The total exposure to fair value
as of June 30, 2010 of $3.0 million related to such contracts was reclassified to an account
receivable.
Interest rate swaps Interest rate swap agreements generally involve the exchange of
fixed and floating-rate interest payment obligations without the exchange of the underlying
notional principal amount. As of June 30, 2010, most of the interest rate swaps outstanding are
used for protection against rising interest rates. In the past, interest rate swaps volume was
much higher since they were used to convert fixed-rate brokered CDs (liabilities), mainly those
with long-term maturities, to a variable rate and mitigate the interest rate risk inherent in
variable rate loans. All interest rate swaps related to brokered CDs were called during 2009, in
the face of lower interest rate levels, and, as a consequence, the Corporation exercised its call
option on the swapped-to-floating brokered CDs.
Structured repurchase agreements The Corporation uses structured repurchase
agreements, with embedded call options, to reduce the Corporations exposure to interest rate
risk by lengthening the contractual maturities of its liabilities, while keeping funding costs
low. Another type of structured repurchase agreement includes repurchase agreements with embedded
cap corridors; these instruments also provide protection in a rising rate scenario.
81
For detailed information regarding the volume of derivative activities (e.g. notional amounts),
location and fair values of derivative instruments in the Statement of Financial Condition and the
amount of gains and losses reported in the Statement of Loss, refer to Note 8 in the accompanying
unaudited consolidated financial statements.
The following tables summarize the fair value changes in the Corporations derivatives as well as
the sources of the fair values:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-month period ended |
|
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
Fair value of contracts outstanding at the beginning of the period |
|
$ |
(531 |
) |
Contracts terminated or called during the period |
|
|
(2,587 |
) |
Changes in fair value during the period |
|
|
(1,642 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Fair value of contracts outstanding as of June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
(4,760 |
) |
|
|
|
|
82
Source of Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
In Excess |
|
|
Total |
|
(In thousands) |
|
One Year |
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
3-5 Years |
|
|
of 5 Years |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
As of June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pricing from observable market inputs |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
(613 |
) |
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
(4,226 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,760 |
) |
Pricing that consider unobservable market inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
(613 |
) |
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
(4,226 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,760 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps, are subject to market risk. As is
the case with investment securities, the market value of derivative instruments is largely a
function of the financial markets expectations regarding the future direction of interest rates.
Accordingly, current market values are not necessarily indicative of the future impact of
derivative instruments on earnings. This will depend, for the most part, on the shape of the yield
curve as well as the level of interest rates.
As of June 30, 2010, all of the derivative instruments held by the Corporation were considered
economic undesignated hedges.
The use of derivatives involves market and credit risk. The market risk of derivatives stems
principally from the potential for changes in the value of derivative contracts based on changes in
interest rates. The credit risk of derivatives arises from the potential of default from the
counterparty. To manage this credit risk, the Corporation deals with counterparties of good credit
standing, enters into master netting agreements whenever possible and, when appropriate, obtains
collateral. Master netting agreements incorporate rights of set-off that provide for the net
settlement of contracts with the same counterparty in the event of default. Currently, the
Corporation is mostly engaged in derivative instruments with counterparties with a credit rating of
single A or better. All of the Corporations interest rate swaps are supported by securities
collateral agreements, which allow the delivery of securities to and from the counterparties
depending on the fair value of the instruments, to minimize credit risk.
Refer to Note 19 of the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for
additional information regarding the fair value determination of derivative instruments.
83
Set forth below is a detailed analysis of the Corporations credit exposure by counterparty
with respect to derivative instruments outstanding as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
As of June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exposure at |
|
|
Negative |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Interest Receivable |
|
Counterparty |
|
Notional |
|
|
Fair Value(1) |
|
|
Fair Values |
|
|
Fair Values |
|
|
(Payable) |
|
Interest rate swaps with rated counterparties: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JP Morgan |
|
$ |
43,580 |
|
|
$ |
440 |
|
|
$ |
(4,879 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,439 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Credit Suisse First Boston |
|
|
12,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Goldman Sachs |
|
|
6,515 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
|
|
Morgan Stanley |
|
|
109,279 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,885 |
|
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
(5,202 |
) |
|
|
(4,400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other derivatives (2) |
|
|
135,307 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
(753 |
) |
|
|
(360 |
) |
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
307,192 |
|
|
$ |
1,195 |
|
|
$ |
(5,955 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,760 |
) |
|
$ |
(135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For each counterparty, this amount includes derivatives with positive fair value excluding the
related accrued interest receivable / payable. |
|
(2) |
|
Credit exposure with several local companies for with a credit rating is not readily available. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exposure at |
|
|
Negative |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Interest Receivable |
|
Counterparty |
|
Notional |
|
|
Fair Value(1) |
|
|
Fair Values |
|
|
Fair Values |
|
|
(Payable) |
|
Interest rate swaps with rated counterparties: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JP Morgan |
|
$ |
67,345 |
|
|
$ |
621 |
|
|
$ |
(4,304 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,683 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Credit Suisse First Boston |
|
|
49,311 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(764 |
) |
|
|
(762 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Goldman Sachs |
|
|
6,515 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
|
|
Morgan Stanley |
|
|
109,712 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232,883 |
|
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
(5,068 |
) |
|
|
(3,650 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other derivatives (2) |
|
|
284,619 |
|
|
|
4,518 |
|
|
|
(1,399 |
) |
|
|
3,119 |
|
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
517,502 |
|
|
$ |
5,936 |
|
|
$ |
(6,467 |
) |
|
$ |
(531 |
) |
|
$ |
(269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For each counterparty, this amount includes derivatives with positive fair value excluding the
related accrued interest receivable / payable. |
|
(2) |
|
Credit exposure with several local companies for with a credit rating is not readily available.
Approximately $4.2 million of the credit exposure with local companies relates to caps referenced
to mortgages bought to a local financial institution that was taken over by another institution
during the second quarter of 2010 through an FDIC-assisted transaction. |
A Hull-White Interest Rate Tree approach is used to value the option components of
derivative instruments. The discounting of the cash flows is performed using US dollar LIBOR-based
discount rates or yield curves that account for the industry sector and the credit rating of the
counterparty and/or the Corporation. Although most of the derivative instruments are fully
collateralized, a credit spread is considered for those that are not secured in full. The
cumulative mark-to-market effect of credit risk in the valuation of derivative instruments resulted
in an unrealized gain of approximately $0.5 million as of June 30, 2010, of which an immaterial
unrealized loss of $65,000 was recorded in the first half of 2010 and an unrealized loss of $2.7
million was recorded in the first half of 2009. The Corporation compares the valuations obtained
with valuations received from counterparties, as an internal control procedure
Credit Risk Management
First BanCorp is subject to credit risk mainly with respect to its portfolio of loans
receivable and off-balance sheet instruments, mainly derivatives and loan commitments. Loans
receivable represents loans that First BanCorp holds for investment and, therefore, First BanCorp
is at risk for the term of the loan. Loan commitments represent commitments to extend credit,
subject to specific conditions, for specific amounts and maturities. These commitments may expose
the Corporation to credit risk and are subject to the same review and approval process as for
loans. Refer to Contractual Obligations and Commitments above for further details. The credit
risk of derivatives arises from the potential of the counterpartys default on its contractual
obligations. To manage this credit risk, the Corporation deals with counterparties of good credit
standing, enters into master netting agreements whenever possible and, when appropriate, obtains
collateral. For further details and information on the Corporations derivative credit risk
exposure, refer to the Interest Rate Risk Management section above. The Corporation manages
its credit risk through credit policy, underwriting, independent loan review and quality control
procedures, comprehensive financial analysis, and established management committees. The
Corporation also employs proactive collection and loss mitigation efforts. Furthermore, personnel
performing structured loan workout functions are responsible for avoiding defaults and minimizing
losses upon default within each region and for each business segment. The group utilizes
relationship officers, collection specialists and attorneys. In the case of residential
construction projects, the workout function monitors project specifics, such as project management
and marketing, as deemed necessary.
84
The Corporation may also have risk of default in the securities portfolio. The securities held
by the Corporation are principally fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Treasury and
agency securities. Thus, a substantial portion of these instruments is backed by mortgages, a
guarantee of a U.S. government-sponsored entity or the full faith and credit of the U.S. government
and is deemed to be of the highest credit quality.
Management, comprised of the Corporations Chief Risk Officer, Chief Credit Risk Officer,
Chief Lending Officer, and other senior executives, have the primary responsibility for setting
strategies to achieve the Corporations credit risk goals and objectives. These goals and
objectives are documented in the Corporations Credit Policy.
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and Non-performing Assets
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
The allowance for loan and lease losses represents the estimate of the level of reserves
appropriate to absorb inherent credit losses. The amount of the allowance was determined by
judgments regarding the quality of each individual loan portfolio. All known relevant internal and
external factors that affected loan collectibility were considered, including analyses of
historical charge-off experience, migration patterns, changes in economic conditions, and changes
in loan collateral values. For example, factors affecting the economies of Puerto Rico, Florida
(USA), the US Virgin Islands and the British Virgin Islands may contribute to delinquencies and
defaults above the Corporations historical loan and lease losses. Such factors are subject to
regular review and may change to reflect updated performance trends and expectations, particularly
in times of severe stress such as have been experienced since 2008. The process includes judgmental
and quantitative elements that may be subject to significant change. There is no certainty that the
allowance will be adequate over time to cover credit losses in the portfolio because of continued
adverse changes in the economy, market conditions, or events adversely affecting specific
customers, industries or markets. To the extent actual outcomes differ from our estimates, the
credit quality of our customer base materially decreases or the risk profile of a market, industry,
or group of customers changes materially, or if the allowance is determined to not be adequate,
additional provision for credit losses could be required, which could adversely affect our
business, financial condition, liquidity, capital, and results of operations in future periods.
The allowance for loan and lease losses provides for probable losses that have been identified
with specific valuation allowances for individually evaluated impaired loans and for probable
losses believed to be inherent in the loan portfolio that have not been specifically identified.
Internal risk ratings are assigned to each business loan at the time of approval and are subject to
subsequent periodic reviews by the Corporations senior management. The allowance for loan and
lease losses is reviewed on a quarterly basis as part of the Corporations continued evaluation of
its asset quality.
A specific valuation allowance is established for those commercial and real estate loans
classified as impaired, primarily when the collateral value of the loan (if the impaired loan is
determined to be collateral dependent) or the present value of the expected future cash flows
discounted at the loans effective rate is lower than the carrying amount of that loan. The
specific valuation allowance is computed on commercial, construction and real estate loans of $1
million or more, Troubled Debt Restructured loans (TDRs), which are individually evaluated, as
well as smaller residential mortgage loans considered impaired based on their delinquency and
loan-to-value levels. When foreclosure is probable, the impairment measure is based on the fair
value of the collateral. The fair value of the collateral is generally obtained from appraisals.
Updated appraisals are obtained when the Corporation determines that loans are impaired and are
updated annually thereafter. In addition, appraisals are also obtained for residential mortgage
loans based on specific characteristics such as delinquency levels, age of the appraisal, and
loan-to-value ratios. Deficiencies from the excess of the recorded investment in collateral
dependent loans over the resulting fair value of the collateral are generally charged-off when
deemed uncollectible. For residential mortgage loans, during the
second quarter of 2010, the determination of reserves included the incorporation of updated loss
factors applicable to loans expected to liquidate over the next 12 months considering the expected
realization of similar asset values at disposition.
For all other loans, which include, small, homogeneous loans, such as auto loans, consumer
loans, finance lease loans, residential mortgages, in amounts under $1 million and commercial and
construction loans not considered impaired, the Corporation maintains a general valuation
allowance. The Corporation updates the factors used to compute the reserve factors on a quarterly
basis. The general reserve is primarily determined by applying loss factors according to the loan
type and assigned risk category (pass, special mention and substandard not impaired; all doubtful
loans are considered impaired). The general reserve for consumer loans is based on factors such as
delinquency trends, credit bureau score bands, portfolio type, geographical location, bankruptcy
trends, recent market transactions, and other environmental factors such as economic forecasts.
The analysis of the residential mortgage pools is performed at the individual loan level and then
aggregated to determine the expected loss ratio. The model applies risk-adjusted prepayment curves,
default curves, and severity curves to each loan in the pool. The severity is affected by the
expected house price scenario based on recent house price trends. Default curves are used in the
model to determine expected delinquency levels. The risk-adjusted timing of liquidation and
associated costs are used in the model and are risk-adjusted for the area in which the property is
located (Puerto Rico, Florida, or Virgin Islands). For commercial loans, including construction
loans, the general reserve is based on historical loss ratios, trends in non-accrual loans, loan
type, risk-rating, geographical location, changes in collateral values for collateral dependent
loans and macroeconomic data that correlates to portfolio performance for the geographical region.
The
85
methodology of accounting for all probable losses in loans not individually measured for
impairment purposes is made in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance that requires that
losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring and estimable.
The blended general reserve factors utilized for most portfolios increased during 2010 due to the
continued increase in charge-offs and the continued deterioration in the economy and property
values. The blended general reserve factor for commercial mortgage loans increased from 2.41% in
December 2009 to 3.18% at June 30, 2010. The construction loans blended general factor increased
from 9.82% in December, 2009 to 13.10% at June 30, 2010. The consumer and finance leases reserve
factor increased from 4.36% in December 2009 to 4.39% at June 30, 2010. The C&I blended general
reserve factor increased from 2.44% in December 2009 to 2.77% at June 30, 2010. There was an increase in the amount of specific reserves
for residential mortgage loans resulting from the aforementioned updates to loss factors for loans
expected to liquidate over the next 12 months. The higher level of impaired residential mortgage
loans is mainly related to the modification of loans through the Home Affordable Modification
Program of the Federal government, for which a sustained period of repayment performance under the
modified terms was observed and are not necessarily classified as a non-performing loan.
Substantially all of the Corporations loan portfolio is located within the boundaries of the
U.S. economy. Whether the collateral is located in Puerto Rico, the U.S. and British Virgin Islands
or the U.S. mainland (mainly in the state of Florida), the performance of the Corporations loan
portfolio and the value of the collateral supporting the transactions are dependent upon the
performance of and conditions within each specific area real estate market. Recent economic reports
related to the real estate market in Puerto Rico indicate that the real estate market is
experiencing readjustments in value driven by the loss of income due to the unemployment of
consumers, less demand and the general economic conditions. The Corporation sets adequate
loan-to-value ratios upon original approval following the regulatory and credit policy standards.
The real estate market for the U.S. Virgin Islands remains fairly stable. In the Florida market,
residential real estate has experienced a very slow turnover, but the Corporation continues to
reduce its credit exposure through disposition of assets and different loss mitigation initiatives
as the end of this difficult credit cycle in the Florida region appears to be approaching.
86
As shown in the following table, the allowance for loan and lease losses increased to $604.3
million at June 30, 2010, compared with $528.1 million at December 31, 2009. Expressed as a
percent of period-end total loans receivable, the ratio increased to 4.83% at June 30, 2010,
compared with 3.79% at December 31, 2009. The $76.2 million increase in the allowance primarily
reflected increases in specific reserves associated with impaired loans, predominantly
construction, commercial and residential mortgage loans. The increase is also a result of
adjustments to loss rate factors used to determine general reserves primarily to account for the
increase in net charge-offs. Refer to the Provision for Loan and Lease Losses discussion above
for additional information. The following table sets forth an analysis of the activity in the
allowance for loan and lease losses during the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Six-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses, beginning of period |
|
$ |
575,303 |
|
|
$ |
302,531 |
|
|
$ |
528,120 |
|
|
$ |
281,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
31,307 |
|
|
|
16,659 |
|
|
|
60,046 |
|
|
|
29,908 |
|
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
22,759 |
|
|
|
27,491 |
|
|
|
60,319 |
|
|
|
31,032 |
|
Commercial and Industrial |
|
|
41,525 |
|
|
|
65,596 |
|
|
|
33,840 |
|
|
|
72,076 |
|
Construction |
|
|
40,398 |
|
|
|
112,611 |
|
|
|
139,698 |
|
|
|
143,167 |
|
Consumer and finance leases |
|
|
10,804 |
|
|
|
12,795 |
|
|
|
23,855 |
|
|
|
18,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
146,793 |
|
|
|
235,152 |
|
|
|
317,758 |
|
|
|
294,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
(17,623 |
) |
|
|
(3,329 |
) |
|
|
(30,969 |
) |
|
|
(10,491 |
) |
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
(17,989 |
) |
|
|
(14,232 |
) |
|
|
(37,307 |
) |
|
|
(14,720 |
) |
Commercial and Industrial |
|
|
(26,186 |
) |
|
|
(13,762 |
) |
|
|
(50,108 |
) |
|
|
(21,383 |
) |
Construction |
|
|
(43,250 |
) |
|
|
(82,847 |
) |
|
|
(96,573 |
) |
|
|
(91,381 |
) |
Consumer and finance leases |
|
|
(15,468 |
) |
|
|
(17,205 |
) |
|
|
(31,865 |
) |
|
|
(35,860 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(120,516 |
) |
|
|
(131,375 |
) |
|
|
(246,822 |
) |
|
|
(173,835 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and Industrial |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
Construction |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Consumer and finance leases |
|
|
2,357 |
|
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
|
4,606 |
|
|
|
5,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,724 |
|
|
|
1,438 |
|
|
|
5,248 |
|
|
|
5,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
(117,792 |
) |
|
|
(129,937 |
) |
|
|
(241,574 |
) |
|
|
(168,361 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses, end of period |
|
$ |
604,304 |
|
|
$ |
407,746 |
|
|
$ |
604,304 |
|
|
$ |
407,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to period end total loans receivable |
|
|
4.83 |
% |
|
|
3.11 |
% |
|
|
4.83 |
% |
|
|
3.11 |
% |
Net charge-offs (annualized) to average loans outstanding during the period |
|
|
3.62 |
% |
|
|
3.85 |
% |
|
|
3.63 |
% |
|
|
2.52 |
% |
Provision for loan and lease losses to net charge-offs during the period |
|
|
1.25 |
x |
|
|
1.81 |
x |
|
|
1.32 |
x |
|
|
1.75 |
x |
The following table sets forth information concerning the allocation of the allowance for
loan and lease losses by loan category and the percentage of loan balances in each category to the
total of such loans as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
$ |
60,246 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
$ |
31,165 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
94,187 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
63,972 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Construction loans |
|
|
199,080 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
164,128 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Commercial and Industrial loans (including loans to
a local financial institution) |
|
|
171,347 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
186,007 |
|
|
|
38 |
% |
Consumer loans and finance leases |
|
|
79,444 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
82,848 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
604,304 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
528,120 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
The following table sets forth information concerning the composition of the
Corporations allowance for loan and lease losses as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 by loan
category and by whether the allowance and related provisions were calculated individually or
through a general valuation allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
Consumer and |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Loans |
|
Loans |
|
C&I Loans |
|
Loans |
|
Finance Leases |
|
Total |
As of June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans without specific reserves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans, net of charge-offs |
|
$ |
286,652 |
|
|
$ |
26,138 |
|
|
$ |
75,136 |
|
|
$ |
177,318 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
565,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with specific reserves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans, net of charge-offs |
|
|
206,788 |
|
|
|
209,579 |
|
|
|
338,608 |
|
|
|
550,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,305,588 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
40,710 |
|
|
|
48,660 |
|
|
|
65,480 |
|
|
|
122,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
277,642 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal balance |
|
|
19.69 |
% |
|
|
23.22 |
% |
|
|
19.34 |
% |
|
|
22.30 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
21.27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans with general allowance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans |
|
|
2,988,727 |
|
|
|
1,429,834 |
|
|
|
3,822,417 |
|
|
|
582,134 |
|
|
|
1,809,168 |
|
|
|
10,632,280 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
19,536 |
|
|
|
45,527 |
|
|
|
105,867 |
|
|
|
76,288 |
|
|
|
79,444 |
|
|
|
326,662 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal balance |
|
|
0.65 |
% |
|
|
3.18 |
% |
|
|
2.77 |
% |
|
|
13.10 |
% |
|
|
4.39 |
% |
|
|
3.07 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total portfolio, excluding loans held for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans |
|
$ |
3,482,167 |
|
|
$ |
1,665,551 |
|
|
$ |
4,236,161 |
|
|
$ |
1,310,065 |
|
|
$ |
1,809,168 |
|
|
$ |
12,503,112 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
60,246 |
|
|
|
94,187 |
|
|
|
171,347 |
|
|
|
199,080 |
|
|
|
79,444 |
|
|
|
604,304 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal balance |
|
|
1.73 |
% |
|
|
5.66 |
% |
|
|
4.04 |
% |
|
|
15.20 |
% |
|
|
4.39 |
% |
|
|
4.83 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans without specific reserves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans, net of charge-offs |
|
$ |
384,285 |
|
|
$ |
62,920 |
|
|
$ |
48,943 |
|
|
$ |
100,028 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
596,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with specific reserves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans, net of charge-offs |
|
|
60,040 |
|
|
|
159,284 |
|
|
|
243,123 |
|
|
|
597,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,060,088 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
2,616 |
|
|
|
30,945 |
|
|
|
62,491 |
|
|
|
86,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,145 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal balance |
|
|
4.36 |
% |
|
|
19.43 |
% |
|
|
25.70 |
% |
|
|
14.41 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
17.18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans with general allowance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans |
|
|
3,151,183 |
|
|
|
1,368,617 |
|
|
|
5,059,363 |
|
|
|
794,920 |
|
|
|
1,898,104 |
|
|
|
12,272,187 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
28,549 |
|
|
|
33,027 |
|
|
|
123,516 |
|
|
|
78,035 |
|
|
|
82,848 |
|
|
|
345,975 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal balance |
|
|
0.91 |
% |
|
|
2.41 |
% |
|
|
2.44 |
% |
|
|
9.82 |
% |
|
|
4.36 |
% |
|
|
2.82 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total portfolio, excluding loans held for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans |
|
$ |
3,595,508 |
|
|
$ |
1,590,821 |
|
|
$ |
5,351,429 |
|
|
$ |
1,492,589 |
|
|
$ |
1,898,104 |
|
|
$ |
13,928,451 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
31,165 |
|
|
|
63,972 |
|
|
|
186,007 |
|
|
|
164,128 |
|
|
|
82,848 |
|
|
|
528,120 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal balance |
|
|
0.87 |
% |
|
|
4.02 |
% |
|
|
3.48 |
% |
|
|
11.00 |
% |
|
|
4.36 |
% |
|
|
3.79 |
% |
88
The following tables show the activity for impaired loans and the related specific reserves
during the first half of 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Impaired Loans: |
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
1,656,264 |
|
Loans determined impaired during the period |
|
|
570,528 |
|
Net charge-offs (1) |
|
|
(199,635 |
) |
Loans sold, net of charge-offs of $15.6 million (2) |
|
|
(70,749 |
) |
Loans foreclosed, paid in full and partial payments, net of additional disbursements |
|
|
(85,576 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
1,870,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Approximately $94.6 million, or 47%, is related to construction loans. Also, approximately
$30.3 million, or 15% related to two commercial loan relationships in Puerto Rico. |
|
(2) |
|
Related to one construction loan and two commercial mortgage loans (originally disbursed as
condo-conversion) sold in Florida . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Loans |
|
|
Mortgage Loans |
|
|
C&I Loans |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Total |
|
Allowance for impaired loans, beginning of period |
|
$ |
2,616 |
|
|
$ |
30,945 |
|
|
$ |
62,491 |
|
|
$ |
86,093 |
|
|
$ |
182,145 |
|
Provision for impaired loans |
|
|
61,423 |
|
|
|
51,429 |
|
|
|
50,962 |
|
|
|
131,318 |
|
|
|
295,132 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(23,329 |
) |
|
|
(33,714 |
) |
|
|
(47,973 |
) |
|
|
(94,619 |
) |
|
|
(199,635 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for impaired loans, end of period |
|
$ |
40,710 |
|
|
$ |
48,660 |
|
|
$ |
65,480 |
|
|
$ |
122,792 |
|
|
$ |
277,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality
Credit trends have shown some signs of improvement towards the end of the first half of 2010.
Non-performing loans have decreased when compared to the fourth quarter of 2009. The decrease in
non-performing loans was a function of problem credit resolutions, including the sale of
non-performing loans, charge-off activity, as well as a reduction in the migration of loans to
nonaccrual status.
Non-accrual Loans and Non-performing Assets
Total non-performing assets consist of non-accrual loans, foreclosed real estate and other
repossessed properties as well as non-performing investment securities. Non-accrual loans are those
loans on which the accrual of interest is discontinued. When a loan is placed in non-accrual
status, any interest previously recognized and not collected is reversed and charged against
interest income.
Non-accrual Loans Policy
Residential Real Estate Loans The Corporation classifies real estate loans in non-accrual
status when interest and principal have not been received for a period of 90 days or more.
Commercial and Construction Loans The Corporation places commercial loans (including
commercial real estate and construction loans) in non-accrual status when interest and principal
have not been received for a period of 90 days or more or when there are doubts about the potential
to collect all of the principal based on collateral deficiencies or, in other situations, when
collection of all of principal or interest is not expected due to deterioration in the financial
condition of the borrower. Cash payments received on certain loans that are impaired and
collateral dependent are recognized when collected in accordance with the contractual terms of the
loans. The principal portion of the payment is used to reduce the principal balance of the loan,
whereas the interest portion is recognized on a cash basis (when collected). However, when
management believes that the ultimate collectability of principal is in doubt, the interest portion
is applied to principal. The risk exposure of this portfolio is diversified as to individual
borrowers and industries among other factors. In addition, a large portion is secured with real
estate collateral.
Finance Leases Finance leases are classified in non-accrual status when interest and
principal have not been received for a period of 90 days or more.
Consumer Loans Consumer loans are classified in non-accrual status when interest and
principal have not been received for a period of 90 days or more.
89
Other Real Estate Owned (OREO)
OREO acquired in settlement of loans is carried at the lower of cost (carrying value of the
loan) or fair value less estimated costs to sell off the real estate at the date of acquisition
(estimated realizable value).
Other Repossessed Property
The other repossessed property category includes repossessed boats and autos acquired in
settlement of loans. Repossessed boats and autos are recorded at the lower of cost or estimated
fair value.
Investment Securities
This category presents investment securities reclassified to non-accrual status, at their book
value.
Past Due Loans
Past due loans are accruing loans which are contractually delinquent 90 days or more. Past due
loans are either current as to interest but delinquent in the payment of principal or are insured
or guaranteed under applicable FHA and VA programs.
The Corporation has in place loan loss mitigation programs providing homeownership
preservation assistance. Loans modified through this program are reported as non-accrual loans and
interest is recognized on a cash basis. When there is reasonable assurance of repayment and the
borrower has made payments over a sustained period, the loan is returned to accrual status.
The following table presents non-performing assets as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Non-accrual loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
$ |
448,079 |
|
|
|
441,642 |
|
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
200,033 |
|
|
|
196,535 |
|
Commercial and Industrial |
|
|
233,201 |
|
|
|
241,316 |
|
Construction |
|
|
621,387 |
|
|
|
634,329 |
|
Finance leases |
|
|
4,394 |
|
|
|
5,207 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
43,571 |
|
|
|
44,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
|
1,550,665 |
|
|
|
1,563,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REO |
|
|
72,358 |
|
|
|
69,304 |
|
Other repossessed property |
|
|
13,383 |
|
|
|
12,898 |
|
Investment securities (1) |
|
|
64,543 |
|
|
|
64,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
1,700,949 |
|
|
$ |
1,710,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Past due loans 90 days and still accruing |
|
$ |
187,659 |
|
|
$ |
165,936 |
|
Non-performing assets to total assets |
|
|
9.39 |
% |
|
|
8.71 |
% |
Non-accrual loans to total loans receivable |
|
|
12.40 |
% |
|
|
11.23 |
% |
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
$ |
604,304 |
|
|
$ |
528,120 |
|
Allowance to total non-accrual loans |
|
|
38.97 |
% |
|
|
33.77 |
% |
Allowance to total non-accrual loans, excluding residential real estate loans |
|
|
54.81 |
% |
|
|
47.06 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Collateral pledged with Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. |
90
The following table shows non-performing assets by geographic segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Puerto Rico: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
$ |
383,780 |
|
|
$ |
376,018 |
|
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
136,941 |
|
|
|
128,001 |
|
Commercial and Industrial |
|
|
224,156 |
|
|
|
229,039 |
|
Construction |
|
|
459,805 |
|
|
|
385,259 |
|
Finance leases |
|
|
4,394 |
|
|
|
5,207 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
40,492 |
|
|
|
40,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
|
1,249,568 |
|
|
|
1,163,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REO |
|
|
55,841 |
|
|
|
49,337 |
|
Other repossessed property |
|
|
13,117 |
|
|
|
12,634 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
64,543 |
|
|
|
64,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
1,383,069 |
|
|
$ |
1,290,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Past due loans 90 days and still accruing |
|
$ |
143,405 |
|
|
$ |
128,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virgin Islands: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
$ |
11,278 |
|
|
$ |
9,063 |
|
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
8,153 |
|
|
|
11,727 |
|
Commercial and Industrial |
|
|
5,576 |
|
|
|
8,300 |
|
Construction |
|
|
4,929 |
|
|
|
2,796 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
1,417 |
|
|
|
3,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
|
31,353 |
|
|
|
35,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REO |
|
|
1,019 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
Other repossessed property |
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
32,591 |
|
|
$ |
36,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Past due loans 90 days and still accruing |
|
$ |
44,254 |
|
|
$ |
23,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
$ |
53,021 |
|
|
$ |
56,561 |
|
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
54,939 |
|
|
|
56,807 |
|
Commercial and Industrial |
|
|
3,469 |
|
|
|
3,977 |
|
Construction |
|
|
156,653 |
|
|
|
246,274 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
1,662 |
|
|
|
1,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
|
269,744 |
|
|
|
364,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REO |
|
|
15,498 |
|
|
|
19,497 |
|
Other repossessed property |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
285,289 |
|
|
$ |
384,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Past due loans 90 days and still accruing |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,044 |
|
Total non-accrual loans were $1.55 billion at June 30, 2010, and represented 12.40% of total
loans receivable. This was down $13.2 million, or 0.84%, from $1.56 billion, or 11.23% of total
loans receivable, at December 31, 2009. The slight decrease from the fourth quarter of 2009 is
primarily a result of decreases in non-accrual loans in the construction, C&I and consumer loan
portfolios, which was partially offset by increases in non-performing residential and commercial
mortgage loans.
Total non-accrual construction loans decreased $12.9 million, or 2.04% from the end of the fourth
quarter. The decrease was mainly in the United States where non-accrual construction loans
decreased $89.6 million or 36.39% from $246.3 million as of December 31, 2009 to $156.7 million at
June 30, 2010. The decrease was driven by the sale of a loan with a carrying value of $52 million.
The sale was part of the Corporations ongoing efforts to reduce its non-performing credits through
its Special Assets Group (SAG) and was executed at an amount in excess of the loan carrying amount.
The loan had been in non performing status since the second quarter of 2009. The SAG also manages
all activities related to the Corporations classified credits and non-performing assets for the
commercial business at a centralized level. The SAG oversees collection efforts for those loans not
classified and performing to prevent excess migration to the non-performing and/or classified
status.
C&I non-accrual loans decreased $8.1 million, or 3.36%, from the end of the fourth quarter. The
decrease resulted from charge-offs of $49.8 million during the period, including a charge-off of
$15.3 million relating to one relationship based on its financial condition and a charge-off of
$15.0 million associated with a loan extended to a local financial institution in Puerto Rico and,
to a lesser extent, payments received and applied to non-performing loans. This was partially
offset by the inflow of non-accrual loans during the period, mainly in Puerto Rico and spread
throughout several industries.
91
Non-accrual commercial mortgage loans increased by $3.5 million, or 1.78%, from the end of the
fourth quarter. The increase was in Puerto Rico where commercial mortgage non-performing loans
increased by $8.9 million or 6.98% when compared to $128.0 million as of December 31, 2009. Total
non-accrual commercial mortgage loans in the Virgin Islands decreased by $3.6 million mainly
attributed to restoration to accrual status of a $3.8 million loan based on its compliance with
performance terms and debt service capacity. Non-performing commercial mortgage loans in Florida
decreased by $1.9 million, mainly related to charge-offs of collateral dependent loans.
Non-accrual residential mortgage loans increased by $6.4 million, or 1.46%, as compared to the
balance at December 31, 2009. Non-accrual residential mortgage loans in Puerto Rico increased by
$7.8 million, or 2.06%, from the end of 2009, which reflects the continued trend of higher
unemployment rates affecting consumers, partially off-set by a decrease in Florida. Efforts to
proactively address existing issues with loss mitigation and loan modification transactions have
helped to minimize the inflow of new non-accrual loans towards the end of the first half of 2010.
Approximately $230.2 million, or 51% of total non-accrual residential mortgage loans, have been
written down to their net realizable value. The non-accrual residential mortgage loan portfolio in
the Virgin Islands increased by $2.2 million when compared to the last quarter of 2009.
The levels of non-accrual consumer loans, including finance leases, remained stable showing a $2.1
million decrease during the first half of 2010, mainly in connection with the Virgin Islands
portfolio.
At June 30, 2010, approximately $44.9 million of loans placed in non-accrual status, mainly
construction and commercial loans, were current or had delinquencies of less than 90 days in their
interest payments. Collections are being recorded on a cash basis through earnings, or on a
cost-recovery basis, as conditions warrant.
During the second quarter and first half of 2010, interest income of approximately $2.7 million and
$4.2 million, respectively, related to $876.8 million of non-accrual loans as of June 30, 2010,
mainly non-accrual construction and commercial loans, was applied against the related principal
balances under the cost-recovery method. The Corporation will continue to evaluate restructuring
alternatives to mitigate losses and enable borrowers to repay their loans under revised terms in an
effort to preserve the value of the Corporations interests over the long-term.
The allowance to non-performing loans ratio as of June 30, 2010 was 38.97%, compared to 33.77% as
of December 31, 2009. The increase in the ratio is attributable in part to increases in reserve
factors for classified loans and additional charges to specific reserves. As of June 30, 2010,
approximately $431.6 million, or 27.83%, of total non-performing loans have been charged-off to
their net realizable value as shown in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
Consumer and |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Loans |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
C&I Loans |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Finance Leases |
|
|
Total |
|
As of June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans charged-off to realizable value |
|
$ |
230,216 |
|
|
$ |
24,365 |
|
|
$ |
41,667 |
|
|
$ |
135,332 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
431,580 |
|
Other non-performing loans |
|
|
217,863 |
|
|
|
175,668 |
|
|
|
191,534 |
|
|
|
486,055 |
|
|
|
47,965 |
|
|
|
1,119,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
$ |
448,079 |
|
|
$ |
200,033 |
|
|
$ |
233,201 |
|
|
$ |
621,387 |
|
|
$ |
47,965 |
|
|
$ |
1,550,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance to non-performing loans |
|
|
13.45 |
% |
|
|
47.09 |
% |
|
|
73.48 |
% |
|
|
32.04 |
% |
|
|
165.63 |
% |
|
|
38.97 |
% |
Allowance to non-performing loans, excluding
non-performing loans charged-off to realizable value |
|
|
27.65 |
% |
|
|
53.62 |
% |
|
|
89.46 |
% |
|
|
40.96 |
% |
|
|
165.63 |
% |
|
|
54.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans charged-off to realizable value |
|
$ |
320,224 |
|
|
$ |
38,421 |
|
|
$ |
19,244 |
|
|
$ |
139,787 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
517,676 |
|
Other non-performing loans |
|
|
121,418 |
|
|
|
158,114 |
|
|
|
222,072 |
|
|
|
494,542 |
|
|
|
50,041 |
|
|
|
1,046,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
$ |
441,642 |
|
|
$ |
196,535 |
|
|
$ |
241,316 |
|
|
$ |
634,329 |
|
|
$ |
50,041 |
|
|
$ |
1,563,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance to non-performing loans |
|
|
7.06 |
% |
|
|
34.19 |
% |
|
|
75.74 |
% |
|
|
25.87 |
% |
|
|
165.56 |
% |
|
|
33.77 |
% |
Allowance to non-performing loans, excluding
non-performing loans charged-off to realizable value |
|
|
25.67 |
% |
|
|
42.50 |
% |
|
|
82.31 |
% |
|
|
33.19 |
% |
|
|
165.56 |
% |
|
|
50.48 |
% |
The Corporation provides homeownership preservation assistance to its customers through a loss
mitigation program in Puerto Rico and through programs sponsored by the Federal Government. Due to
the nature of the borrowers financial condition, restructurings or loan modifications through
these program as well as other restructurings of individual commercial, commercial mortgage loans,
construction loans and residential mortgages in the U.S. mainland fit the definition of TDR. A
restructuring of a debt constitutes a TDR if the creditor for economic or legal reasons related to
the debtors financial difficulties grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise
consider. Modifications involve changes in one or more of the loan terms that bring a defaulted
loan current and
92
provide sustainable affordability. Changes may include the refinancing of any past-due amounts,
including interest and escrow, the extension of the maturity of the loans and modifications of the
loan rate. As of June 30, 2010, the Corporations TDR loans
consisted of $161.2 million of
residential mortgage loans, $51.0 million commercial and industrial loans, $100.3 million
commercial mortgage loans and $140.0 million of construction
loans. From the $452.6 million total
TDR loans, approximately $154.3 million are in compliance with modified terms, $10.9 million are
30-89 days delinquent, and $287.4 million are classified as non-accrual as of June 30, 2010.
Included
in the $452.6 million of TDR loans are certain impaired condo-conversion loans
restructured into two separate agreements (loan splitting) in the fourth quarter of 2009. At that
time, each of these loans was restructured into two notes, one that represents the portion of the
loan that is expected to be fully collected along with contractual interest and the second note
that represents the portion of the original loan that was charged-off. The restructuring of these
loans was made after analyzing the borrowers and guarantors capacity to service the debt and
ability to perform under the modified terms. As part of the
restructuring of the loans, the first
note of each loan requires a monthly payment of principal and interest that amortize the debt over
25 years at a market rate of interest. An interest rate reduction was granted for the second note.
The carrying value of the notes deemed collectible amounted to $22.1 million as of June 30, 2010
and the charge-offs recorded prior to 2010 associated with these loans were $29.7 million. The
loans that have been deemed collectible continue to be individually evaluated for impairment
purposes and a specific reserve of $3.1 million was allocated to these loans as of June 30, 2010.
Total non-performing assets, which include non-accrual loans, were $1.7 billion at June 30, 2010.
This was down $9.7 million, or 0.56%, from $1.71 billion at the end of the fourth quarter of 2009.
During the first half of 2010, the Corporation sold approximately $23.7 million of REO properties
including a condo-conversion property in Florida with a carrying value of $8.0 million on which a
loss of $2.1 million was recorded at the time of sale.
The over 90-day delinquent, but still accruing, loans to total loans receivable ratio, excluding
loans guaranteed by the U.S. Government, was 0.87% at June 30, 2010, up from 0.68% at the end of
the fourth quarter, but down 21 basis points from a year-ago.
Net Charge-offs and Total Credit Losses
Total net charge-offs for the first half of 2010 were $241.6 million or 3.63% of average loans on
an annualized basis, compared to $168.4 million or an annualized 2.52% of average loans for the
first half of 2009. Even though the increase in net charge-offs in absolute numbers was higher in
Puerto Rico, loss rates (charge-offs to average loans) for all major loan categories continued to
be significantly higher in the United States than in Puerto Rico.
Construction loans net charge-offs in the first half of 2010 were $96.4 million, or an annualized
13.17%, up from $91.4 million, or an annualized 11.52% of related loans, in the first half of 2009.
First half results were substantially impacted by individual charge-offs in excess of $5 million.
There were four loan relationships with charge-offs in excess of $5 million for the first half of
2010, or $43.5 million of total construction loans charge-offs. Construction loans net charge-offs
in Puerto Rico were $54.5 million, including $28.5 million charge-off associated with three
relationships. Construction loans net charge-offs in the United States of $41.8 million, of which
$15.0 million was related to a single residential project. The Corporation continued its ongoing
management efforts including obtaining updated appraisals for the collateral for impaired loans and
assessing a projects status within the context of market environment expectations; generally,
appraisal updates are requested annually. This portfolio remains susceptible to the ongoing
housing market disruptions, particularly in Puerto Rico. In the United States, based on the
portfolio management process, including charge-off activity over the past year and several sales of
problem credits, the credit issues in this portfolio have been substantially addressed. The
Corporation is engaged in continuous efforts to identify alternatives that enable borrowers to
repay their loans while protecting the Corporations investments.
C&I loans net charge-offs in the first half of 2010 were $49.8 million, or an annualized 2.05%, an
increase of $28.6 million when compared to the $21.2 million, or an annualized 0.89% of related
loans, recorded in the first half of 2009. There was a $15.3 million charge-off in the first half
associated with the previously mentioned non-performing loan based on the financial condition of
the borrower and a $15.0 million charge-off associated with a loan extended to R&G Financial that
was adequately reserved prior to 2010. Remaining C&I net charge-offs in the first half of 2010 were
concentrated in Puerto Rico, where they were distributed across several industries, with the
largest individual charge-off amounting to $4.7 million.
Commercial mortgage loans net charge-offs in the first half of 2010 were $37.1 million, or an
annualized 4.71%, a $22.4 million increase from the first half of 2009. The first half charge-offs
were mainly from Florida loans, which accounts for $34.5 million of total commercial mortgage net
charge-offs.
Residential mortgage net charge-offs were $31.0 million, or an annualized 1.74% of related average
loans. This was up from $10.5 million, or an annualized 0.61%, of related average balances in the
first half of 2009. The higher loss level is mainly related to reductions in property values.
Approximately $21.3 million in charge-offs for the first half ($13.9 million in Puerto Rico and
$6.9 million in Florida) resulted from valuations, for impairment purposes, of residential mortgage
loan portfolios considered homogeneous
93
given high delinquency and loan-to-value levels, compared to $3.0 million recorded in the first
half of 2009, mainly in Puerto Rico. The total amount of the residential mortgage loan portfolio
that was evaluated for impairment purposes amounted to approximately $340.6 million as of June 30,
2010, of which loans aggregating $230.2 million have been charged-off to their net realizable
value, representing approximately 51% of the total non-performing residential mortgage loan
portfolio outstanding as of June 30, 2010 and a reserve was allocated to the remaining balance. Net
charge-offs for residential mortgage loans also include $6.6 million related to loans foreclosed
during the first half, compared to $6.9 million recorded for loans foreclosed in the first half of
2009. Consistent with the Corporations assessment of the value of properties and current and
future market conditions, management is executing strategies to avoid foreclosures and to
accelerate the sale of the real estate acquired in satisfaction of debt (REO). The ratio of net
charge-offs to average loans in the Corporations residential mortgage loan portfolio of 1.99% for
the quarter ended June 30, 2010 is lower than the approximately 2.38% average charge-off rate for
commercial banks in the U.S. mainland for the first quarter of 2010, as per statistical releases
published by the Federal Reserve, and loss rates in the Corporations Puerto Rico operations
continue to be lower than loss rates experienced in the Florida market.
Net charge-offs of consumer loans and finance leases in the first half of 2010 were $27.3 million
compared to net charge-offs of $30.6 million for the first half of 2009. Annualized net charge-offs
as a percentage of related loans decreased to 2.94% from 2.98% for the first half of 2009.
Performance of this portfolio on both absolute and relative terms continued to be consistent with
managements views regarding the underlying quality of the portfolio. The level of delinquencies
has improved compared to the prior quarter, further supporting managements views of improved
performance going forward.
94
The following table presents annualized charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Quarter Ended |
|
For the Six-Month Period Ended |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
Residential mortgage loans |
|
|
1.99 |
% |
|
|
0.39 |
% |
|
|
1.74 |
% |
|
|
0.61 |
% |
|
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
4.56 |
% |
|
|
3.71 |
% |
|
|
4.71 |
% |
|
|
1.93 |
% |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
2.25 |
% |
|
|
1.12 |
% |
|
|
2.05 |
% |
|
|
0.89 |
% |
|
Construction loans |
|
|
11.96 |
% |
|
|
20.38 |
% |
|
|
13.17 |
% |
|
|
11.52 |
% |
|
Consumer loans (1) |
|
|
2.86 |
% |
|
|
3.12 |
% |
|
|
2.94 |
% |
|
|
2.98 |
% |
|
Total loans |
|
|
3.62 |
% |
|
|
3.85 |
% |
|
|
3.63 |
% |
|
|
2.52 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes lease financing. |
The above ratios are based on annualized charge-offs and are not necessarily indicative
of the results expected for the entire year or in subsequent periods.
The following table presents charge-offs (annualized) to average loans held-in-portfolio by
geographic segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Six-Month Period Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
PUERTO RICO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
2.09 |
% |
|
|
0.43 |
% |
|
|
1.60 |
% |
|
|
0.65 |
% |
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
0.34 |
% |
|
|
1.13 |
% |
|
|
0.52 |
% |
|
|
0.67 |
% |
Commercial and Industrial |
|
|
2.48 |
% |
|
|
1.08 |
% |
|
|
2.19 |
% |
|
|
0.85 |
% |
Construction |
|
|
8.56 |
% |
|
|
8.33 |
% |
|
|
11.04 |
% |
|
|
5.88 |
% |
Consumer and finance leases |
|
|
2.94 |
% |
|
|
3.10 |
% |
|
|
2.95 |
% |
|
|
2.85 |
% |
Total loans |
|
|
2.81 |
% |
|
|
1.90 |
% |
|
|
2.80 |
% |
|
|
1.55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VIRGIN ISLANDS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.19 |
% |
|
|
0.24 |
% |
|
|
0.11 |
% |
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
10.61 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
5.31 |
% |
Commercial and Industrial (1) |
|
|
-1.41 |
% |
|
|
2.61 |
% |
|
|
-0.73 |
% |
|
|
1.59 |
% |
Construction |
|
|
0.01 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.08 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Consumer and finance leases |
|
|
0.46 |
% |
|
|
2.73 |
% |
|
|
2.22 |
% |
|
|
3.39 |
% |
Total loans |
|
|
-0.32 |
% |
|
|
1.69 |
% |
|
|
0.11 |
% |
|
|
1.14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FLORIDA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
3.67 |
% |
|
|
0.32 |
% |
|
|
4.71 |
% |
|
|
0.88 |
% |
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
13.84 |
% |
|
|
7.63 |
% |
|
|
13.53 |
% |
|
|
3.87 |
% |
Commercial and Industrial |
|
|
1.16 |
% |
|
|
0.02 |
% |
|
|
6.16 |
% |
|
|
3.10 |
% |
Construction |
|
|
32.75 |
% |
|
|
50.28 |
% |
|
|
29.93 |
% |
|
|
25.53 |
% |
Consumer and finance leases |
|
|
4.86 |
% |
|
|
5.01 |
% |
|
|
4.40 |
% |
|
|
7.56 |
% |
Total loans |
|
|
14.59 |
% |
|
|
19.93 |
% |
|
|
14.23 |
% |
|
|
10.60 |
% |
|
|
|
1-
For the second quarter and first half of 2010, recoveries in commercial and industrial loans in
the Virgin Islands exceeded charge-offs. |
Total credit losses (equal to net charge-offs plus losses on REO operations) for the
first half of 2010 amounted to $256.1 million, or 3.83% on an annualized basis to average loans and
repossessed assets in contrast to credit losses of $180.4 million, or a loss rate of 2.69%, for the
first half of 2009.
95
The following table presents a detail of the REO inventory and credit losses for the periods
indicated:
Credit Loss Performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Six-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
REO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REO balances, carrying value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
$ |
49,189 |
|
|
$ |
31,522 |
|
|
$ |
49,189 |
|
|
$ |
31,522 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
17,863 |
|
|
|
10,477 |
|
|
|
17,863 |
|
|
|
10,477 |
|
Condo-conversion projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
Construction |
|
|
5,306 |
|
|
|
8,065 |
|
|
|
5,306 |
|
|
|
8,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
72,358 |
|
|
$ |
58,064 |
|
|
$ |
72,358 |
|
|
$ |
58,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REO activity (number of properties): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning property inventory, |
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
Properties acquired |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
Properties disposed |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending property inventory |
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average holding period (in days) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
Condo-conversion projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487 |
|
Construction |
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REO operations (loss) gain: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market adjustments and (losses) gain on sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
$ |
(818 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,924 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,063 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,109 |
) |
Commercial |
|
|
(4,214 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(4,890 |
) |
|
|
(443 |
) |
Condo-conversion projects |
|
|
(2,140 |
) |
|
|
(1,500 |
) |
|
|
(2,140 |
) |
|
|
(1,500 |
) |
Construction |
|
|
(1,426 |
) |
|
|
(502 |
) |
|
|
(1,377 |
) |
|
|
(965 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,598 |
) |
|
|
(3,970 |
) |
|
|
(10,470 |
) |
|
|
(8,017 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other REO operations expenses |
|
|
(2,218 |
) |
|
|
(2,656 |
) |
|
|
(4,039 |
) |
|
|
(3,984 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss on REO operations |
|
$ |
(10,816 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,626 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,509 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,001 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHARGE-OFFS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential charge-offs, net |
|
|
(17,619 |
) |
|
|
(3,329 |
) |
|
|
(30,965 |
) |
|
|
(10,491 |
) |
Commercial charge-offs, net |
|
|
(43,858 |
) |
|
|
(27,967 |
) |
|
|
(86,931 |
) |
|
|
(35,874 |
) |
Construction charge-offs, net |
|
|
(43,204 |
) |
|
|
(82,847 |
) |
|
|
(96,419 |
) |
|
|
(91,370 |
) |
Consumer and finance leases charge-offs, net |
|
|
(13,111 |
) |
|
|
(15,794 |
) |
|
|
(27,259 |
) |
|
|
(30,626 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs, net |
|
|
(117,792 |
) |
|
|
(129,937 |
) |
|
|
(241,574 |
) |
|
|
(168,361 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CREDIT LOSSES (1) |
|
$ |
(128,608 |
) |
|
$ |
(136,563 |
) |
|
$ |
(256,083 |
) |
|
$ |
(180,362 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS RATIO PER CATEGORY (2): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
2.05 |
% |
|
|
0.61 |
% |
|
|
1.83 |
% |
|
|
0.89 |
% |
Commercial |
|
|
3.10 |
% |
|
|
1.74 |
% |
|
|
2.85 |
% |
|
|
1.16 |
% |
Construction |
|
|
12.82 |
% |
|
|
20.65 |
% |
|
|
13.53 |
% |
|
|
11.71 |
% |
Consumer |
|
|
2.84 |
% |
|
|
3.10 |
% |
|
|
2.92 |
% |
|
|
2.97 |
% |
TOTAL CREDIT LOSS RATIO (3) |
|
|
3.92 |
% |
|
|
4.03 |
% |
|
|
3.83 |
% |
|
|
2.69 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Equal to REO operations (losses) gains plus Charge-offs, net. |
|
(2) |
|
Calculated as net charge-offs plus market adjustments and gains
(losses) on sale of REO divided by average loans and repossessed assets. |
|
(3) |
|
Calculated as net charge-offs plus net loss on REO operations
divided by average loans and repossessed assets. |
96
Operational Risk
The Corporation faces ongoing and emerging risk and regulatory pressure related to the
activities that surround the delivery of banking and financial products. Coupled with external
influences such as market conditions, security risks, and legal risk, the potential for operational
and reputational loss has increased. In order to mitigate and control operational risk, the
Corporation has developed, and continues to enhance, specific internal controls, policies and
procedures that are designated to identify and manage operational risk at appropriate levels
throughout the organization. The purpose of these mechanisms is to provide reasonable assurance
that the Corporations business operations are functioning within the policies and limits
established by management.
The Corporation classifies operational risk into two major categories: business specific and
corporate-wide affecting all business lines. For business specific risks, a risk assessment group
works with the various business units to ensure consistency in policies, processes and assessments.
With respect to corporate-wide risks, such as information security, business recovery, legal and
compliance, the Corporation has specialized groups, such as the Legal Department, Information
Security, Corporate Compliance, Information Technology and Operations. These groups assist the
lines of business in the development and implementation of risk management practices specific to
the needs of the business groups.
Legal and Compliance Risk
Legal and compliance risk includes the risk of non-compliance with applicable legal and
regulatory requirements, the risk of adverse legal judgments against the Corporation, and the risk
that a counterpartys performance obligations will be unenforceable. The Corporation is subject to
extensive regulation in the different jurisdictions in which it conducts it business, and this
regulatory scrutiny has been significantly increasing over the last several years. The Corporation
has established and continues to enhance procedures based on legal and regulatory requirements that
are designed to ensure compliance with all applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. The
Corporation has a Compliance Director who reports to the Chief Risk Officer and is responsible for
the oversight of regulatory compliance and implementation of an enterprise-wide compliance risk
assessment process. The Compliance division has officer roles in each major business areas with
direct reporting relationships to the Corporate Compliance Group.
Concentration Risk
The Corporation conducts its operations in a geographically concentrated area, as its main
market is Puerto Rico. However, the Corporation has diversified its geographical risk as evidenced
by its operations in the Virgin Islands and in Florida.
As
of June 30, 2010, the Corporation had $167.3 million
outstanding on credit facilities
granted to the Puerto Rico government and/or its political subdivisions, down from $1.2 billion as
of December 31, 2009, and $184.1 million granted to the Virgin Islands government. A substantial
portion of these credit facilities are obligations that have a specific source of income or
revenues identified for their repayment, such as property taxes collected by the central Government
and/or municipalities. Another portion of these obligations consists of loans to public
corporations that obtain revenues from rates charged for services or products, such as electric
power and water utilities. Public corporations have varying degrees of independence from the
central Government and many receive appropriations or other payments from it. The Corporation also
has loans to various municipalities in Puerto Rico for which the good faith, credit and unlimited
taxing power of the applicable municipality has been pledged to their repayment.
The largest loan to one borrower as of June 30, 2010 in the amount of $304.2 million is with
one mortgage originator in Puerto Rico, Doral Financial Corporation. This commercial loan is
secured by individual mortgage loans on residential and commercial real estate. Of the total gross
loan portfolio of $12.6 billion as of June 30, 2010, approximately 83% has credit risk
concentration in Puerto Rico, 8% in the United States (mainly in the state of Florida) and 9% in
the Virgin Islands.
97
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
For information regarding market risk to which the Corporation is exposed, see the information
contained in Part I Item 2 -Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations Risk Management.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Control and Procedures
First BanCorps management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of First BanCorps disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
as of June 30, 2010. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were
effective.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes to the Corporations internal control over financial reporting (as
such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal
quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Corporations internal control over financial reporting.
98
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In the opinion of the Companys management, the pending and threatened legal proceedings of
which management is aware will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the
Corporation.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Our business, operating results and/or the market price of our common and preferred stock may
be significantly affected by a number of factors. For a detailed discussion of certain risk
factors that could affect the Corporations operations, financial condition or results for future
periods see the risk factors below and Item 1A, Risk Factors, in the Corporations 2009 Annual
Report on Form 10-K. These factors could also cause actual results to differ materially from
historical results or the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this
report. Also refer to the discussion in Part I Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this report for additional information that
may supplement or update the discussion of risk factors in the Corporations 2009 Form 10-K.
The risks described in the Corporations 2009 Form 10-K and in this report are not the only
risks facing the Corporation. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to the
Corporation or currently deemed by the Corporation to be immaterial also may materially adversely
affect the Corporations business, financial condition or results of operations.
Legislative and regulatory actions taken now or in the future as a result of the current crisis in
the financial industry may impact our business, governance structure, financial condition or
results of operations.
Current economic conditions, particularly in the financial markets, have resulted in government
regulatory agencies and political bodies placing increased focus and scrutiny on the financial
services industry. The U.S. government has intervened on an unprecedented scale, responding to what
has been commonly referred to as the financial crisis, by temporarily enhancing the liquidity
support available to financial institutions, establishing a commercial paper funding facility,
temporarily guaranteeing money market funds and certain types of debt issuances and increasing
insurance on bank deposits.
These programs have subjected financial institutions, particularly those participating in the U.S.
Treasurys Troubled Asset Relief Program (the TARP), to additional restrictions, oversight and
costs. In addition, new proposals for legislation continue to be introduced in the U.S. Congress
that could further substantially increase regulation of the financial services industry, impose
restrictions on the operations and general ability of firms within the industry to conduct business
consistent with historical practices, including in the areas of compensation, interest rates,
financial product offerings and disclosures, and have an effect on bankruptcy proceedings with
respect to consumer residential real estate mortgages, among other things. Federal and state
regulatory agencies also frequently adopt changes to their regulations or change the manner in
which existing regulations are applied.
We also face increased regulation and regulatory scrutiny as a result of our participation in the
TARP. The Corporation issued Series G Preferred Stock to the U.S. Treasury in exchange for the
shares of Series F Preferred Stock and accrued and unpaid dividends. We also issued to the U.S.
Treasury an amended and restated warrant to replace the original warrant that we issued to the U.S.
Treasury under the TARP. Pursuant to the terms of this issuance, we are prohibited from increasing
the dividend rate on our Common Stock in an amount exceeding the last quarterly cash dividend paid
per share, or the amount publicly announced (if lower), of Common Stock prior to October 14, 2008,
which was $0.07 per share, without approval.
On January 21, 2009, the U.S. House of Representatives approved legislation amending the TARP
provisions of Emergency Economic Stabilization Act (EESA) to include quarterly reporting
requirements with respect to lending activities, examinations by an institutions primary federal
regulator of the use of funds and compliance with program requirements, restrictions on
acquisitions by depository institutions receiving TARP funds and authorization for the U.S.
Treasury to have an observer at board meetings of recipient institutions, among other things. On
February 17, 2009, President Obama signed into law the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of
2009 (the ARRA). The ARRA contains expansive new restrictions on executive compensation for
financial institutions and other companies participating in the TARP. The ARRA amends the executive
compensation and corporate governance provisions of EESA. In doing so, it continues all the same
compensation and governance restrictions and adds substantially to restrictions in several areas.
In addition, on June 10, 2009, the U.S. Treasury issued regulations implementing the compensation
requirements under the ARRA. The regulations became applicable to existing TARP recipients upon
publication in the Federal Register on June 15, 2009. On June 21, 2010, the banking agencies issued
additional guidance on incentive compensation. The guidance is designed to provide employees with
incentives that appropriately balance risk and reward, and ensure that incentive compensation
arrangements are compatible with effective controls and risk management, and are supported by
strong corporate governance, including active and effective oversight by the holding company or
banks board of directors. The aforementioned compensation requirements and restrictions may
adversely affect our ability to retain or hire senior bank officers.
99
On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank
Act) was signed into law, which significantly changes the regulation of financial institutions and
the financial services industry. The Dodd-Frank Act includes provisions affecting large and small
financial institutions alike, including several provisions that will affect how community banks,
thrifts, and small bank and thrift holding companies will be regulated in the future. The Act
includes, among other things, provisions that, together with regulations to be developed
thereunder, will affect corporate governance and executive compensation at all publicly-traded
companies; abolish the Office of Thrift Supervision and transfer its functions to the other federal
banking agencies, such as the Office of the Comptroller of Currency and the Federal Reserve; allow
financial institutions to pay interest on business checking accounts; would change the base for
FDIC insurance assessments to a banks average consolidated total assets minus average tangible
equity, rather than upon its deposit base, and permanently raise the current standard maximum
deposit insurance amount to $250,000; expand the FDICs authority to raise insurance premiums; and
impose new capital requirements on bank and thrift holding companies. The Dodd-Frank Act also
limits interchange fees on debit cards and establishes the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection
as an independent entity within the Federal Reserve, which will be given the authority to
promulgate consumer protection regulations applicable to certain entities offering consumer
financial services or products, including banks. The legislation also restricts proprietary
trading, places restrictions on the owning or sponsoring of hedge and private equity funds, and the
derivatives activities of banks and their affiliates. The legislation also calls for the FDIC to
raise the ratio of reserves to deposits from 1.15% to 1.35% for deposit insurance purposes as to
those institutions with assets in excess of $10 billion.
The Collins Amendment to the Dodd-Frank Act eliminates certain trust preferred securities from Tier 1 capital. TARP preferred
securities are excepted from this treatment. These regulatory capital deductions are to
be phased in incrementally over a period of three years beginning on January 1, 2013.
This provision also requires the federal banking agencies, to establish minimum leverage and risk-based capital
requirements that will apply to both insured banks and their holding companies.
Regulations implementing this provision must be issued within 18 months of July 21, 2010.
These provisions, or any other aspects of
current or proposed regulatory or legislative changes to laws applicable to the financial industry,
if enacted or adopted, may impact the profitability of the business activities or change certain of
our business practices, including the ability to offer new products, obtain financing, attract
deposits, make loans, and achieve satisfactory interest spreads, and could expose the Corporation
to additional costs, including increased compliance costs. These changes also may require the
Corporation to invest significant management attention and resources to make any necessary changes
to operations in order to comply, and could therefore also materially adversely affect our
business, financial condition, and results of operations. The Corporations management is actively
reviewing the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, many of which are phased-in over the next several
months and years, and assessing its probable impact on the operations of the Corporation. However,
the ultimate effect of the Dodd-Frank Act on the financial services industry in general, and the
Corporation in particular, is uncertain at this time.
A separate legislative proposal would impose a new fee or tax on U.S. financial institutions as
part of the 2010 budget plans in an effort to reduce the anticipated budget deficit and to recoup
losses anticipated from the TARP. Such an assessment is estimated to be 15-basis points, levied
against bank assets minus Tier 1 capital and domestic deposits. It appears that this fee or tax
would be assessed only against the 50 or so largest financial institutions in the U.S., which are
those with more than $50 billion in assets, and therefore would not directly affect us. However,
the large banks that are affected by the tax may choose to seek additional deposit funding in the
marketplace, driving up the cost of deposits for all banks. The administration has also considered
a transaction tax on trades of stock in financial institutions and a tax on executive bonuses. The
U.S. Congress has also recently adopted additional consumer protection laws such as the Credit Card
Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009, and the Federal Reserve has adopted
numerous new regulations addressing banks credit card, overdraft and mortgage lending practices.
Additional consumer protection legislation and regulatory activity is anticipated in the near
future. Internationally, both the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the Basel Committee)
and the Financial Stability Board (established in April 2009 by the Group of Twenty Finance
Ministers and Central Bank Governors to take action to strengthen regulation and supervision of the
financial system with greater international consistency, cooperation and transparency) have
committed to raise capital standards and liquidity buffers within the banking system. Such
proposals and legislation, if finally adopted, would change banking laws and our operating
environment and that of our subsidiaries in substantial and unpredictable ways. We cannot determine
whether such proposals and legislation will be adopted, or the ultimate effect that such proposals
and legislation, if enacted, or regulations issued to implement the same, would have upon our
financial condition or results of operations.
Our banking subsidiary is operating under a Consent Order with the FDIC and OCIF and the
Corporation is operating under a
Written Agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
On June 4, 2010, we announced that FirstBank agreed to a Consent Order issued by the FDIC and
OCIF dated June 2, 2010, and the Corporation entered into a Written Agreement with the FED dated
June 3, 2010. These Agreements stem from the FDICs examination as of the period ended June 30,
2009 conducted during the second half of 2009. Under the Order, the Bank agreed to address
specific areas through the adoption and implementation of procedures, plans and policies designed
to improve the safety and soundness of the Bank. These actions include, among others, that the Bank
will have and retain qualified management and have active Board participation in the affairs of the
Bank, develop and adopt a plan to attain a leverage ratio of at least 8%, a Tier 1 risk-based
capital ratio of at least 10% and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 12%, reduce the
level of special mention and classified assets and delinquent and non-accrual loans, develop a
funds management plan, which includes a reduction in the reliance on brokered deposits, obtain
approval prior to the issuance of any brokered deposits and report quarterly on the Banks progress
in meeting the requirements of the Order. The Written Agreement, which is designed to enhance the
Corporations ability to act as a source of strength to the Bank, requires that the Corporation
obtain FED approval before paying dividends, receiving dividends from the Bank, making payments on
subordinated debt or trust preferred securities, incurring or guaranteeing debt or purchasing or
redeeming any corporate stock. The Written Agreement also requires the Corporation to submit to the
FED a capital plan and progress reports, comply with certain notice provisions prior to appointing
new directors or senior executive officers and comply with certain payment
100
restrictions on severance payments and indemnification restrictions.
If we need to continue to recognize significant reserves and we cannot
complete a Capital Raise or cannot accomplish other alternate capital
preservation strategies contemplated, including among others, an
accelerated deleverage strategy and the divesture of profitable
businesses which could allow us to meet the minimum capital
requirements included in the capital plans, the Corporation and FirstBank may not be able to comply with the minimum
capital requirements included in the capital plans required by the Agreements. These capital plans, which we have submitted but are
subject to the approval of our regulators, set forth our plan to attain the capital ratio
requirements set forth in the Order over time. If, at the end of any quarter, we do not comply with
any specified minimum capital ratios, we must notify our regulators. The Corporation must notify
the FED within 30 days of the end of any quarter of its inability to comply with a capital ratio
requirement and submit an acceptable written plan that details the steps it will take to comply
with the requirement. FirstBank must immediately notify the FDIC of its inability to comply with a
capital ratio requirement and, within 45 days, it must either increase its capital to comply with
the ratio requirements or submit a contingency plan to the FDIC for its sale, merger, or
liquidation. In the event of a liquidation of FirstBank, the holders of any outstanding preferred
stock would rank senior to the holders of our common stock with respect to rights upon any
liquidation of the Corporation.
We have dedicated and
expect to continue to dedicate significant resources to our efforts to comply with these
Agreements, which may increase operational costs or adversely affect the amount of time our
management has to conduct our operations.
If we fail to comply with the Agreements, we may become subject to
additional regulatory enforcement action up to and including the appointment of a conservator or
receiver for the Bank. In many cases when a conservator or receiver is appointed for a wholly-owned
bank, the bank holding company files for bankruptcy protection.
We will need additional capital resources in the future and these capital resources may not be
available when needed or at all.
Due to financial results during 2009 and the first half of 2010, we need to access the capital
markets in order to raise additional capital to absorb future credit losses due to the distressed
economic environment, maintain adequate liquidity and capital resources, finance future growth,
investments or strategic acquisitions and implement the capital plan required by the Agreements. We have
been taking steps to raise $500 million of common equity. We cannot provide assurances that such
capital will be available on acceptable terms or at all. If we are unable to obtain additional
capital or otherwise improve our financial condition in the near
future, or are unable to accomplish other alternate capital
preservation strategies which could allow us to meet the minimum
capital requirements included in the capital plans required by the
Agreements, we believe that it is
likely that our regulators would take additional regulatory action that could have a material
adverse effect on our business, operations, financial condition or results of operations or the
value of our common stock. In addition, without adequate capital, we may not be able to maintain
adequate liquidity and capital resources or to finance future growth, make strategic acquisitions
or investments.
Certain funding sources may not be available to us.
Our funding sources include core deposits, brokered deposits, borrowings from the Federal Home
Loan Bank and repurchase agreements with several counterparties. A large portion of FirstBanks
funding is retail brokered certificates of deposit (CDs). We issue brokered CDs to, among other
things, pay operating expenses, maintain our lending activities, replace certain maturing
liabilities, and control interest rate risk. As of June 30, 2010, we had $7.1 billion in brokered
deposits outstanding, representing approximately 56% of our total deposits, and a reduction from
$7.6 billion at year end 2009. The average term to maturity of the retail brokered CDs outstanding
as of June 30, 2010 was approximately 1.2 years. Approximately 3% of the principal value of these
certificates is callable at our option. The Order we recently entered into requires us to obtain
approval prior to issuing, renewing or rolling over brokered CDs and to develop a plan to reduce
our reliance on brokered CDs. Although the FDIC has issued temporary waivers through September 30,
2010, no assurance can be given that we will continue to receive such waivers or that such waivers
will enable us to issue brokered CDs in amounts that meet our funding needs. The use of brokered
CDs has been particularly important for the funding of our operations. If we are unable to issue brokered CDs, our
results of operations and liquidity would be adversely affected. During 2009 and 2010, the Bank
participated in liquidity stimulus programs promoted by the U.S. Government. As market conditions
improved, the stimulus was gradually withdrawn, and participating financial institutions have been
asked to shift to regular funding sources, and re-pay borrowings such as Advances from the Federal
Reserve Bank Discount Window. Although the FED no longer permits FirstBank to borrow from the
Discount Window for its regular funding needs, we believe that continued access to our regular funding
sources will enable the Corporation to obtain adequate funds. The loss of access to the Discount
Window could adversely affect access to funds if these other sources of funds prove to be
inadequate.
101
We depend on cash dividends from FirstBank to meet our cash obligations, but the Agreement with the
FED prohibits the payment of such dividends without prior FED approval, which may adversely affect
our ability to fulfill our obligations.
As a holding company, dividends from FirstBank have provided a substantial portion of our cash
flow used to service the interest payments on our trust preferred securities and other obligations.
As outlined in the Agreement, the Bank cannot pay any cash dividends or other payments to the
Corporation without prior written approval of the FED. Additionally, the Corporation cannot declare
or pay any dividends (including on the Series G Preferred Stock) or make any distributions of
interest, principal or other sums on subordinated debentures or trust preferred securities without
prior written approval of the FED. Our inability to receive dividends from FirstBank could
adversely affect our ability to fulfill our obligations in the future.
Banking regulators could take additional adverse action against us.
We are subject to supervision and regulation by the FED. We are a bank holding company that
qualifies as a financial holding corporation. As such, we are permitted to engage in a broader
spectrum of activities than those permitted to bank holding companies that are not financial
holding companies. As of June 30, 2010, First BanCorp and FirstBank continue to satisfy all
applicable established capital guidelines. Nevertheless, we agreed to regulatory actions by our
banking regulators that included, among other things, the submission
of a capital plan by FirstBank to comply with more stringent capital
requirements under an established time period proposed by us in the
capital plan.
Our regulators could take additional action against us if we fail to comply with the Agreements,
including the requirements of the submitted capital plans. If we were not to continue to qualify as
a financial holding corporation, we might be required to discontinue certain activities and may be
prohibited from engaging in new activities without prior regulatory approval. Additional adverse
action against us by our primary regulators could adversely affect our business.
Credit quality, which is continuing to deteriorate, may result in future additional losses.
The quality of our credits has continued to be under pressure as a result of continued recessionary
conditions in Puerto Rico and the state of Florida that have led to, among other things, higher
unemployment levels, much lower absorption rates for new residential construction projects and
further declines in property values. Our business depends on the creditworthiness of its customers
and counterparties and the value of the assets securing its loans or underlying our investments.
When the credit quality of the customer base materially decreases or the risk profile of a market,
industry or group of customers changes materially, our business, financial condition, allowance
levels, asset impairments, liquidity, capital and results of operations are adversely affected.
While we have substantially increased our allowance for loan and lease losses in 2009 and the first
half of 2010, we may have to recognize additional provisions in the second through fourth quarters
of 2010 to cover future credit losses in the portfolio. We periodically review the allowance for
loan and lease losses for adequacy considering economic conditions and trends, collateral values
and credit quality indicators, including charge-off experience and levels of past due loans and
non-performing assets. Our future results may be materially and adversely affected by worsening
defaults and severity rates related to the underlying collateral.
We may have more credit risk and higher credit losses due to our construction loan portfolio.
We have a significant construction loan portfolio, in the amount of $1.31 billion as of June 30,
2010, mostly secured by commercial and residential real estate properties. Due to their nature,
these loans entail a higher credit risk than consumer and residential mortgage loans, since they
are larger in size, concentrate more risk in a single borrower and are generally more sensitive to
economic downturns. Rapidly changing collateral values, general economic conditions and numerous
other factors continue to create volatility in the housing markets and have increased the
possibility that additional losses may have to be recognized with respect to our current
nonperforming assets. Furthermore, given the current slowdown in the real estate market, the
properties securing these loans may be difficult to dispose of if they are foreclosed.
Accelerated prepayments may adversely affect net interest income.
Net interest income of future periods will be affected by the Corporations decision to deleverage
its investment securities portfolio to preserve its capital position. Also, net interest income
could be affected by prepayments of mortgage-backed securities. Acceleration in the prepayments of
mortgage-backed securities would lower yields on these securities, as the amortization of premiums
paid upon acquisition of these securities would accelerate. Conversely, acceleration in the
prepayments of mortgage-backed securities would increase yields on securities purchased at a
discount, as the amortization of the discount would accelerate. These risks are directly linked to
future period market interest rate fluctuations. Also, net interest income in future periods might
be affected by the Corporations investment in callable securities. Approximately $951 million of
investment securities, mainly U.S. Agency debentures, with an average yield of 2.10% were called
during the first half of 2010. As of June 30, 2010, the Corporation has approximately $392 million
in debt securities (mainly U.S. agency securities) with embedded calls and with an average yield of
2.26% (mainly securities with contractual maturities of 2 to 3 years). However, the Corporation
has been using proceeds from called securities and investing some of its liquidity in the second
quarter of 2010 through the purchase of approximately $1.9 billion of investment securities.
102
Changes in interest rates may reduce net interest income due to basis risk.
Basis risk occurs when market rates for different financial instruments or the indices used to
price assets and liabilities change at different times or by different amounts. It is the risk of
adverse consequences resulting from unequal changes in the difference, also referred to as the
spread, between two or more rates for different instruments with the same maturity. The interest
expense for liability instruments such as brokered CDs at times does not change by the same amount
as interest income received from loans or investments. The liquidity crisis that erupted in late
2008, and that slowly began to subside during 2009, caused a wider than normal spread between
brokered CD costs and LIBOR rates for similar terms. This, in turn, has prevented us from capturing
the full benefit of a decrease in interest rates, as the floating rate loan portfolio re-prices
with changes in the LIBOR indices, while the brokered CD rates decreased less than the LIBOR
indices. To the extent that such pressures fail to subside in the near future, the margin between
our LIBOR-based assets and the higher cost of the brokered CDs may compress and adversely affect
net interest income.
If all or a significant portion of the unrealized losses in our investment securities portfolio on
our consolidated balance sheet were determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired, we would
recognize a material charge to our earnings and our capital ratios would be adversely affected.
For the year ended December 31, 2009 and the first half of 2010, we recognized a total of $1.7
million in other-than-temporary impairments. To the extent that any portion of the unrealized
losses in our investment securities portfolio is determined to be other-than-temporary and, in the
case of debt securities, the loss is related to credit factors, we recognize a charge to earnings
in the quarter during which such determination is made and capital ratios could be adversely
affected. If any such charge is significant, a rating agency might downgrade our credit rating or
put it on credit watch. Even if we do not determine that the unrealized losses associated with this
portfolio require an impairment charge, increases in these unrealized losses adversely affect our
tangible common equity ratio, which may adversely affect credit rating agency and investor
sentiment towards us. This negative perception also may adversely affect our ability to access the
capital markets or might increase our cost of capital. Valuation and other-than-temporary
impairment determinations will continue to be affected by external market factors including default
rates, severity rates and macro-economic factors.
We may not be able to recover all assets pledged to Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc.
Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. (Lehman) was the counterparty to the Corporation on
certain interest rate swap agreements. During the third quarter of 2008, Lehman failed to pay the
scheduled net cash settlement due to the Corporation, which constituted an event of default under
those interest rate swap agreements. The Corporation terminated all interest rate swaps with Lehman
and replaced them with other counterparties under similar terms and conditions. In connection with
the unpaid net cash settlement due as of June 30, 2010 under the swap agreements, the Corporation
has an unsecured counterparty exposure with Lehman, which filed for bankruptcy on October 3, 2008,
of approximately $1.4 million. This exposure was reserved in the third quarter of 2008. The
Corporation had pledged collateral of $63.6 million with Lehman to guarantee its performance under
the swap agreements in the event payment thereunder was required. The book value of pledged
securities with Lehman as of June 30, 2010 amounted to approximately $64.5 million.
The Corporation believes that the securities pledged as collateral should not be part of the
Lehman bankruptcy estate given the facts that the posted collateral constituted a performance
guarantee under the swap agreements and was not part of a financing agreement, and ownership of the
securities was never transferred to Lehman. Upon termination of the interest rate swap agreements,
Lehmans obligation was to return the collateral to the Corporation. During the fourth quarter of
2009, the Corporation discovered that Lehman Brothers, Inc., acting as agent of Lehman, had
deposited the securities in a custodial account at JP Morgan/ Chase, and that, shortly before the
filing of the Lehman bankruptcy proceedings, it had provided instructions to have most of the
securities transferred to Barclays Capital in New York. After Barclays refusal to turn over the
securities, the Corporation, during the month of December 2009, filed a lawsuit against Barclays
Capital in federal court in New York demanding the return of the securities.
During the month of February 2010, Barclays filed a motion with the court requesting that the
Corporations claim be dismissed on the grounds that the allegations of the complaint are not
sufficient to justify the granting of the remedies therein sought. Shortly thereafter, the
Corporation filed its opposition motion. A hearing on the motions was held in court on April 28,
2010. The court on that date, after hearing the arguments by both sides, concluded that the
Corporations equitable-based causes of action, upon which the return of the investment securities
is being demanded, contain allegations that sufficiently plead facts warranting the denial of
Barclays motion to dismiss the Corporations claim. Accordingly, the judge ordered the case to
proceed to trial. The scheduling conference that had been set for
August 26, 2010, for purposes of having the parties agree on a
timetable for discovery has been temporarily suspended. The judge
decided to order the parties to submit to a mediation process prior
to a scheduling conference. While there have been preliminary
telephonic conversations with the appointed mediator, no formal
mediation sessions have been held. It is expected that within the
next 30 days the mediator will notice dated for mediation sessions. While the Corporation believes it has valid
reasons to support its claim for the return of the securities, no assurances can be given that it
will ultimately succeed in its litigation against Barclays Capital to recover all or a substantial
portion of the securities.
Additionally, the Corporation continues to pursue its claim filed in January 2009 in the
proceedings under the Securities Protection Act with regard to Lehman Brothers Incorporated in
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York. An estimated loss was not accrued as the
Corporation is unable to determine the timing of the claim resolution or whether it will succeed in
recovering all or a substantial portion of the collateral or its equivalent value. If additional
relevant negative facts become available in future
103
periods, a need to recognize a partial or full reserve of this claim may arise. Considering that
the investment securities have not yet been recovered by the Corporation, despite its efforts in
this regard, the Corporation decided to classify such investments as non-performing during the
second quarter of 2009.
Downgrades in our credit ratings could further increase the cost of borrowing funds.
Fitch Ratings Ltd. (Fitch) currently rates First BanCorps and FirstBanks long-term senior
debt B-, six notches below investment grade. Standard and Poors (S&P) rates First BanCorp
CCC+, seven notches below investment grade. Moodys Investor Service (Moodys) rates
FirstBanks long-term senior debt B3, and S&P rates it CCC+. On June 4, 2010, Moodys placed
FirstBank on Credit Watch Negative. Furthermore, on June 25, 2010 Fitch placed First BanCorp and
FirstBank on Credit Watch Negative. We do not have any outstanding debt or derivative agreements
that would be affected by a credit downgrade. Furthermore, given our
non-reliance on corporate debt or other instruments directly linked
in terms of pricing or volume to credit ratings, the liquidity of the
Corporation so far has also not been affected in any material way by
the recent downgrades. The Corporations ability to access new
non-deposit funding, however, could be adversely affected by these
credit ratings and any additional downgrades. Changes in credit ratings may also affect the fair value of certain liabilities and
unsecured derivatives, measured at fair value in the financial statements, for which our own credit
risk is an element considered in the fair value determination. These debt and financial strength
ratings are current opinions of the rating agencies. As such, they may be changed, suspended or
withdrawn at any time by the rating agencies as a result of changes in, or unavailability of,
information or based on other circumstances.
Difficult market conditions have affected the financial industry and may adversely affect us in the
future.
Given that almost all of our business is in Puerto Rico and the United States and given the degree
of interrelation between Puerto Ricos economy and that of the United States, we are particularly
exposed to downturns in the U.S. economy. Dramatic declines in the U.S. housing market over the
past few years, with falling home prices and increasing foreclosures, unemployment and
under-employment, have negatively impacted the credit performance of mortgage loans and resulted in
significant write-downs of asset values by financial institutions, including government-sponsored
entities as well as major commercial banks and investment banks. These write-downs, initially of
mortgage-backed securities but spreading to credit default swaps and other derivative and cash
securities, in turn, have caused many financial institutions to seek additional capital from
private and government entities, to merge with larger and stronger financial institutions and, in
some cases, fail.
Reflecting concern about the stability of the financial markets in general and the strength of
counterparties, many lenders and institutional investors have reduced or ceased providing funding
to borrowers, including other financial institutions. This market turmoil and tightening of credit
have led to an increased level of commercial and consumer delinquencies, erosion of consumer
confidence, increased market volatility and widespread reduction of business activity in general.
The resulting economic pressure on consumers and erosion of confidence in the financial markets has
already adversely affected our industry and may adversely affect our business, financial condition
and results of operations. We do not expect that the difficult conditions in the financial markets
are likely to improve in the near future. A worsening of these conditions would likely exacerbate
the adverse effects of these difficult market conditions on us and other financial institutions. In
particular, we may face the following risks in connection with these events:
|
|
|
Our ability to assess the creditworthiness of our customers may be impaired if the
models and approaches we use to select, manage and underwrite the loans become less
predictive of future behaviors. |
|
|
|
|
The models used to estimate losses inherent in the credit exposure require difficult,
subjective, and complex judgments, including forecasts of economic conditions and how these
economic predictions might impair the ability of the borrowers to repay their loans, which
may no longer be capable of accurate estimation and which may, in turn, impact the
reliability of the models. |
|
|
|
|
Our ability to borrow from other financial institutions or to engage in sales of
mortgage loans to third parties (including mortgage loan securitization transactions with
government-sponsored entities) on favorable terms, or at all, could be adversely affected
by further disruptions in the capital markets or other events, including deteriorating
investor expectations. |
|
|
|
|
Competitive dynamics in the industry could change as a result of consolidation of
financial services companies in connection with current market conditions. |
|
|
|
|
We may be unable to comply with the Agreements, which could result in further regulatory
enforcement actions. |
Our credit quality may be adversely affected by Puerto Ricos current economic condition.
Beginning in March 2006 and continuing to today, a number of key economic indicators have shown
that the economy of Puerto Rico has been in recession during that period of time. Construction
remained weak during 2009 and the first half of 2010, as Puerto Ricos fiscal situation and
decreasing public investment in construction projects affected the sector. During the period from
January to May 2010, cement sales, an indicator of construction activity, declined by 25.4% as
compared to 2009. As of April 2010, exports increased
by 7.9%, while imports decreased by 0.9%, a negative trade, which continues since the first
negative trade balance of the last decade
104
was registered in November 2006. On March 12, 2010, the
Puerto Rico Planning Board announced the release of Puerto Ricos projected macroeconomic data for
the fiscal year ending on June 30, 2010. The fiscal year 2009 showed a reduction of real GNP of
3.7%, while the projections for the 2010 fiscal year point toward a reduction of 3.6%. In general,
the Puerto Rico economy continued its trend of decreasing growth, primarily due to weaker
manufacturing, softer consumption and decreased government investment in construction. The above
economic concerns and uncertainty in the private and public sectors may also have an adverse effect
on the credit quality of our loan portfolios, as delinquency rates are expected to increase in the
short term, until the economy stabilizes. A potential reduction in consumer spending may also
impact growth in our other interest and non-interest revenue sources.
Rating downgrades on the government of Puerto Ricos debt obligations may affect our credit
exposure.
Even though Puerto Ricos economy is closely integrated to that of the U.S. mainland and its
government and many of its instrumentalities are investment grade rated borrowers in the U.S.
capital markets, the current fiscal situation of the government of Puerto Rico has led nationally
recognized rating agencies to downgrade its debt obligations in the past. Between May 2006 and
mid-2009, the government of Puerto Ricos bonds were downgraded as a result of factors such as its
inability to implement meaningful steps to curb operating expenditures and to improve managerial
and budgetary controls, high debt levels and chronic deficits and its continued reliance on
operating budget loans from the Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico.
The failure of other financial institutions could adversely affect us.
Our
ability to engage in routine funding transactions could be adversely
affected by future failures
of financial institutions and the actions and commercial soundness of other financial
institutions. Financial institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing,
counterparty and other relationships. We have exposure to different industries and counterparties,
and routinely execute transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry,
including brokers and dealers, commercial banks, investment banks, investment companies and other
institutional clients. In certain of these transactions, we are required to post collateral to
secure the obligations to the counterparties. In the event of a bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding
involving one of such counterparties, we may experience delays in recovering the assets posted as
collateral or may incur a loss to the extent that the counterparty was holding collateral in excess
of the obligation to such counterparty. There is no assurance that any such losses would not
materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In addition,
many of these transactions expose us to credit risk in the event of a default by our counterparty
or client. In addition, the credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral held by us cannot be
realized or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the loan or
derivative exposure due to us. There is no assurance that any such losses would not materially and
adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Our funding sources may prove insufficient to replace deposits and support future growth.
Our banking subsidiary, FirstBank, relies on customer deposits, brokered deposits and advances
from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) to fund its operations. Although FirstBank has
historically been able to replace maturing deposits and advances if desired, no assurance can be
given that it would be able to replace these funds in the future if our financial condition or
general market conditions were to change or the FDIC did not approve our request to issue brokered
CDs as required by the Order. Our financial flexibility will be severely constrained if FirstBank
is unable to maintain access to funding or if adequate financing is not available at acceptable
interest rates. Finally, if we are required to rely more heavily on more expensive funding sources
to meet our obligations, revenues may not increase proportionately to cover costs. In this case,
profitability would be adversely affected. Although we consider such sources of funds adequate for
our liquidity needs, we may seek additional debt financing in the future to achieve our long-term
business objectives. There can be no assurance that the FED or the
FDIC would approve such additional debt or
that additional borrowings, if sought, would be available to us or on what terms. If additional
financing sources are unavailable or are not available on reasonable terms, our growth and future
prospects could be adversely affected.
Additional issuances of common stock or securities convertible into common stock, including
issuances to the U.S. Treasury, Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) and Investors in a Capital Raise, would
further dilute existing holders of our common stock, including participants in the Exchange Offer.
During the first quarter of 2010, the Corporation announced its plan to enhance its capital
structure. The Corporation retained Sandler ONeill + Partners and UBS Securities LLC to find
purchasers for approximately $500 million of common stock. Any
105
issuance of common stock in a
Capital Raise or to the U.S. Treasury upon conversion of the
Series G Preferred Stock or in the Exchange Offer would
adversely affect the voting power, earnings per share and book value per share of outstanding
shares of common stock. The market price of a
share of common stock on July 14, 2010 was $0.57, and the book value of a share of common stock as
of June 30, 2010 was $5.48. In connection with our 2007 sale of 9,250,450 shares of common stock
to BNS, we agreed to give BNS an anti-dilution right and a right of first refusal when we sell
shares of common stock to third parties. This right will be triggered by the issuance of common
stock in the Exchange Offer and any other issuances, including to the U.S. Treasury and investors
in a Capital Raise. In addition, in January 2009, in connection with our issuance of Series F
Preferred Stock to the U.S. Treasury, we also issued to the U.S. Treasury a warrant to purchase
5,842,259 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $10.27 per share. The warrant has a
10-year term and is exercisable at any time. At the time we exchanged the Series F Preferred Stock
for Series G Preferred Stock, we issued to the U.S. Treasury an amended and restated warrant having
a 10-year term to replace the original warrant. Like the original warrant, the amended and restated
warrant has an anti-dilution right that requires an adjustment to the exercise price for, and the
number of shares underlying, the warrant. This adjustment will be necessary under various
circumstances, including if we issue shares of common stock for consideration per share that is
lower than the initial conversion price of the Series G Preferred Stock, or $0.7252. The possible
future issuance of equity securities to BNS, the U.S. Treasury or investors in a Capital Raise
would affect our current stockholders in a number of ways, including by:
|
|
|
diluting the voting power of the current holders of common stock; |
|
|
|
|
diluting the earnings per share and book value per share of the outstanding shares of
common stock; and |
|
|
|
|
making the payment of dividends on common stock more expensive. |
If we do not improve our
financial condition, or are unable to accomplish other alternate
capital preservation strategies contemplated, including among others,
an accelerated deleverage strategy and the divesture of profitable
businesses which could allow us to meet the minimum capital
requirements as
contemplated by the capital plans that we have submitted to our regulators, we believe that it is
likely that our regulators could take additional regulatory action that would have a material
adverse effect on our business, operations, financial condition or results of operations or the
value of our common stock.
The market price of our common stock may be subject to significant fluctuations and volatility.
The stock markets have recently experienced high levels of volatility. These market
fluctuations have adversely affected, and may continue to adversely affect, the trading price of
our common stock. In addition, the market price of our common stock has been subject to significant
fluctuations and volatility because of factors specifically related to our businesses and may
continue to fluctuate or further decline. Factors that could cause fluctuations, volatility or
further decline in the market price of our common stock, many of which could be beyond our control,
include the following:
|
|
|
our ability to comply with the Agreements; |
|
|
|
|
any additional regulatory actions against us; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to complete the Exchange Offer, a Capital Raise, the conversion into common
stock of the Series G Preferred Stock or any other issuances of common stock; |
|
|
|
|
changes or perceived changes in the condition, operations, results or prospects of our
businesses and market assessments of these changes or perceived changes; |
106
|
|
|
announcements of strategic developments, acquisitions and other material events by us or
our competitors, including any future failures of banks in Puerto Rico; |
|
|
|
|
our announcement of the sale of common stock at a particular price per share; |
|
|
|
|
changes in governmental regulations or proposals, or new governmental regulations or
proposals, affecting us, including those relating to the current financial crisis and
global economic downturn and those that may be specifically directed to us; |
|
|
|
|
the continued decline, failure to stabilize or lack of improvement in general market and
economic conditions in our principal markets; |
|
|
|
|
the departure of key personnel; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the credit, mortgage and real estate markets; |
|
|
|
|
operating results that vary from the expectations of management, securities analysts and
investors; |
|
|
|
|
operating and stock price performance of companies that investors deem comparable to us;
and |
|
|
|
|
market assessments as to whether and when the Exchange Offer and the acquisition of
additional newly issued shares by BNS will be consummated. |
Our suspension of dividends could adversely affect our stock price and result in the expansion of
our board of directors.
In March 2009, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve issued a supervisory guidance letter
intended to provide direction to bank holding companies (BHCs) on the declaration and payment of
dividends, capital redemptions and capital repurchases by BHCs in the context of their capital
planning process. The letter reiterates the long-standing Federal Reserve supervisory policies and
guidance to the effect that BHCs should only pay dividends from current earnings. More
specifically, the letter heightens expectations that BHCs will inform and consult with the Federal
Reserve supervisory staff on the declaration and payment of dividends that exceed earnings for the
period for which a dividend is being paid. In consideration of the financial results reported for
the second quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation decided, as a matter of prudent fiscal
management and following the Federal Reserve guidance, to suspend payment of common stock dividends
and dividends on our Preferred Stock and Series F Preferred Stock. Our Agreement with the FED
precludes us from declaring any dividends without the prior approval of the FED. The Corporation
cannot anticipate if and when the payment of dividends might be reinstated. This suspension could
adversely affect the Corporations stock price. Further, in general, if dividends on our preferred
stock are not paid for 18 monthly dividend periods or more, the preferred stockholders will have
the right to elect two additional members of the our board of directors until all accrued and
unpaid dividends for all past dividend periods have been declared and paid in full.
The price of our common stock is depressed and may not recover.
The price of our common stock has declined significantly from a closing price of $12.17 on
September 19, 2008, to a closing price of $0.54 on
August 6, 2010. Many factors that we cannot predict or control, and factors over which we
may only have limited control, may cause sudden changes in the price of our common stock or prevent
the price of our common stock from recovering.
Our common stock could be delisted if we fall below applicable compliance standards.
Under NYSE rules, a listed company will be considered below compliance standards if the
average closing price of its common stock is less than $1.00 over a consecutive 30 trading-day
period. As of July 6, 2010, the average closing price of our common stock over the last 30
trading-day period was $0.98. Accordingly, the price of our common stock is below the price
criteria compliance standard. If we are unable to cure this deficiency within six months, our
common stock may be suspended from trading on or delisted from the NYSE, which will adversely
impact the market liquidity of our common stock.
The holders of our debt obligations, any shares of Preferred Stock that remain outstanding after
the Exchange Offer and the Series G Preferred Stock will have priority over our common stock with
respect to payment in the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up and with respect to the
payment of dividends.
In any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of First BanCorp, our common stock would rank below
all debt claims against us and claims of all of our outstanding shares of preferred stock,
including any shares of Preferred Stock that are not exchanged for common stock in the Exchange
Offer and the Series G Preferred Stock. As a result, holders of our common stock, including
holders of shares of Preferred Stock whose securities are accepted for exchange in the Exchange
Offer, will not be entitled to receive any payment or other distribution of assets upon the
liquidation, dissolution or winding up of First BanCorp until after all our obligations to our debt
holders have been satisfied and holders of senior equity securities and trust preferred securities
have received any payment or distribution due to them. In addition, we are required to pay
dividends on our preferred stock before we pay any dividends on our common stock. Holders of our
common stock will not be entitled to receive payment of any dividends on their shares of our common
stock unless and until we obtain the FEDs approval to resume payments of dividends on any shares
of preferred stock remaining after completion of the Exchange Offer.
107
Dividends on our common stock have been suspended and you may not receive funds in connection with
your investment in our common stock without selling your shares of our common stock.
The Agreement that we entered into with the FED prohibits us from paying any dividends or making
any distributions without the prior approval of the FED. Holders of our common stock are only
entitled to receive dividends as our board of directors may declare out of funds legally available
for payment of such dividends. We have suspended dividend payments on our common stock since August
2009. Furthermore, so long as any shares of preferred stock remain outstanding and until we obtain
the FEDs approval, we cannot declare, set apart or pay any dividends on shares of our common stock
unless any accrued and unpaid dividends on our preferred stock for the twelve monthly dividend
periods ending on the immediately preceding dividend payment date have been paid or are paid
contemporaneously and the full monthly dividend on our preferred stock for the then current month
has been or is contemporaneously declared and paid or declared and set apart for payment. Prior to
January 16, 2012, unless we have redeemed or converted all of the shares of Series G Preferred
Stock or the U.S. Treasury has transferred all of Series G Preferred Stock to third parties, the
consent of the U.S. Treasury will be required for us to, among other things, increase the dividend
rate per share of common stock above $0.07 per share or repurchase or redeem equity securities,
including our common stock, subject to certain limited exceptions. This could adversely affect the
market price of our common stock. Also, we are a bank holding company and our ability to declare
and pay dividends is dependent also on certain federal regulatory considerations, including the
guidelines of the Federal Reserve regarding capital adequacy and dividends. Moreover, the Federal
Reserve and the FDIC have issued policy statements stating that bank holding companies and insured
banks should generally pay dividends only out of current operating earnings. In the current
financial and economic environment, the Federal Reserve has indicated that bank holding companies
should carefully review their dividend policy and has discouraged dividend pay-out ratios that are
at the 100% or higher level unless both asset quality and capital are very strong. In addition,
the terms of our outstanding junior subordinated debt securities held by trusts that issue trust
preferred securities prohibit us from declaring or paying any dividends or distributions on our
capital stock, including our common stock and preferred stock, or purchasing, acquiring, or making
a liquidation payment on such stock, if we have given notice of our election to defer interest
payments but the related deferral period has not yet commenced or a deferral period is continuing.
Offerings of debt, which would be senior to our common stock and/or to preferred
equity securities, may adversely affect the market price of
our common stock.
Subject to any required approval of our regulators,
or if our capital ratios or those of our banking subsidiary fall below the required
minimums, we or our banking subsidiary could be forced to raise additional capital by making
additional offerings of debt or preferred equity securities, including medium-term notes, trust
preferred securities, senior or subordinated notes and preferred stock. Upon liquidation, holders
of our debt securities and shares of preferred stock and lenders with respect to other borrowings
will receive distributions of our available assets prior to the holders of our common stock.
Additional equity offerings may dilute the holdings of our existing stockholders or reduce the
market price of our common stock, or both. Our board of directors is authorized to issue one or
more classes or series of preferred stock from time to time without any action on the part of the
stockholders. Our board of directors also has the power, without stockholder approval, to set the
terms of any such classes or series of preferred stock that may be issued, including voting rights,
dividend rights and preferences over our common stock with respect to dividends or upon our
dissolution, winding up and liquidation and other terms. If we issue preferred shares in the future
that have a preference over our common stock with respect to the payment of dividends or upon
liquidation, or if we issue preferred shares with voting rights that dilute the voting power of our
common stock, the rights of holders of our common stock or the market price of our common stock
could be adversely affected.
108
Even if we complete the Exchange Offer, without a high level of participation, we may fail to
realize the anticipated benefits of the Exchange Offer, including the intended goals of
substantially improving our tangible common equity ratio and our Tier 1 common equity ratio.
Important goals of the Exchange Offer are to improve our tangible common equity ratio and our Tier
1 common equity ratio and to convert the Series G Preferred Stock into common stock. A view has
recently developed that the tangible common equity ratio and Tier 1 common equity ratio are
important metrics for analyzing a financial institutions financial condition and capital strength.
We believe that improving these two capital ratios will enhance our standing with our federal
banking regulators, improve market and public perceptions of our financial strength and improve our
ability to operate in the current economic environment and to access the capital markets in order
to fund strategic initiatives or other business needs and to absorb any future credit losses.
Moreover, our agreement with the U.S. Treasury provides that we can compel the conversion of the
Series G Preferred Stock into common stock if $385 million of the liquidation preference of the
Preferred Stock is exchanged for common stock, we raise $500 million of additional capital, and our
stockholders approve amendments to our Articles of Incorporation. If the response to the Exchange
Offer is less than $385 million, we will not be able to compel the conversion of the Series G
Preferred Stock and we may fail to reach our goals for our tangible common equity ratio and Tier 1
common equity ratio and, in this situation, we may have to increase these ratios through other
means, including by seeking to sell more than $500 million of equity in a Capital Raise, which
could further dilute the existing holders of our common stock, including participants in the
Exchange Offer. In addition, any such additional equity issuances would reduce any earnings
available to the holders of our common stock and the return thereon unless our earnings increase
correspondingly. We cannot predict the timing or size of future equity issuances, if any, or the
effect that they may have on the market price of the common stock. As such, there is a risk that
the benefits, if any, realized from the Exchange Offer will not be sufficient to restore market and
public perceptions of our financial strength or to reach desired tangible common equity and Tier 1
capital levels.
Failure to successfully complete the Exchange Offer could negatively affect the price of our common
stock.
Several conditions must be satisfied or waived in order to complete the Exchange Offer, including
(i) pursuant to NYSE listing requirements, the receipt of the approval of the holders of our common
stock to the issuance of up to 256,401,610 shares of common stock upon the exchange of Preferred
Stock in the Exchange Offer, (ii) the approval by the holders of our common stock of an amendment
to our Articles of Incorporation to reduce the par value of a share of common stock from $1.00 to
$0.10 per share if necessary to issue shares of common stock in the Exchange Offer, and (iii) the
absence of any event that in our reasonable judgment would materially impair the anticipated
benefits to us of the Exchange Offer or that has had, or could reasonably be expected to have, a
material adverse effect on us or our businesses, financial condition, operations or prospects. The
foregoing conditions may not be satisfied, and if not satisfied or waived, the Exchange Offer may
not occur or may be delayed. If the Exchange Offer is not completed or is delayed, we may be
subject to the following material risks:
|
|
|
the market price of our common stock may decline to the extent that the current market
price of our common stock is positively affected by market assumption that the Exchange
Offer will be completed; |
|
|
|
|
the market price of our shares of Preferred Stock may decline to the extent that the
current market price of our shares of Preferred Stock is positively affected by a market
assumption that the Exchange Offer has been or will be completed; |
|
|
|
|
we may not be able to increase our regulatory and other capital ratios, including our
tangible common equity ratio and Tier 1 common equity ratio and, as a result, we may fail
to increase a key measure of financial strength as viewed by our federal banking regulators
and the market and may not improve our ability to operate in the current economic
environment and to access the capital markets in order to fund strategic initiatives or
other business needs or to absorb any future credit losses; and |
|
|
|
|
we may be required to attempt to raise capital. |
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Not applicable.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. RESERVED
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
109
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
12.1 Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
12.2 Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preference Dividends.
31.1 CEO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 CFO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 CEO Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2 CFO Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
110
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Corporation has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized:
|
|
|
|
|
|
First BanCorp.
Registrant
|
|
Date: August 9, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Aurelio Alemán
|
|
|
|
Aurelio Alemán |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 9, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Orlando Berges
|
|
|
|
Orlando Berges |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer |
|
111