e10vq
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended July 3, 2010
or
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 000-49798
THORATEC CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
California
|
|
94-2340464 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
or organization) |
|
|
|
|
|
6035 Stoneridge Drive, Pleasanton, California
|
|
94588 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(925) 847-8600
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act): Yes o No þ
As of July 31, 2010, the registrant had 58,460,160 shares of common stock outstanding.
THORATEC CORPORATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Thoratec, the Thoratec logo, Thoralon, HeartMate, and HeartMate II are registered trademarks of
Thoratec Corporation, and IVAD is a trademark of Thoratec Corporation.
CentriMag is a registered trademark of Levitronix LLC.
ITC, A-VOX Systems, AVOXimeter, HEMOCHRON, ProTime, ProTime In Rhythm, Surgicutt, Tenderlett,
Tenderfoot, and IRMA are registered trademarks of International Technidyne Corporation (ITC),
Thoratec Corporations wholly-owned subsidiary.
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. |
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
THORATEC CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
January 2, 2010 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
37,435 |
|
|
$ |
27,787 |
|
Short-term available-for-sale investments |
|
|
314,724 |
|
|
|
279,174 |
|
Receivables, net of allowances of $1,086 and $322, respectively |
|
|
50,798 |
|
|
|
48,058 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
48,505 |
|
|
|
44,635 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
12,564 |
|
|
|
12,261 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
4,611 |
|
|
|
4,831 |
|
Prepaid income taxes |
|
|
20,188 |
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
60,848 |
|
|
|
63,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
549,673 |
|
|
|
481,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
37,106 |
|
|
|
37,115 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
95,015 |
|
|
|
95,015 |
|
Purchased intangible assets, net |
|
|
93,409 |
|
|
|
96,876 |
|
Long-term available-for-sale investments |
|
|
24,166 |
|
|
|
24,634 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
9,935 |
|
|
|
12,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
809,304 |
|
|
$ |
747,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
16,187 |
|
|
$ |
6,221 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
12,692 |
|
|
|
17,417 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
10,499 |
|
|
|
12,469 |
|
Senior
subordinated convertible notes |
|
|
133,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities related to assets held for sale |
|
|
12,084 |
|
|
|
12,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
185,344 |
|
|
|
48,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior subordinated convertible notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,929 |
|
Long-term deferred tax liability |
|
|
28,192 |
|
|
|
31,720 |
|
Other |
|
|
9,996 |
|
|
|
10,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
223,532 |
|
|
|
222,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares: no par, authorized 100,000; issued and outstanding 58,453 and 57,043
as of July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010, respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
595,141 |
|
|
|
557,418 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(4,947 |
) |
|
|
(30,321 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on investments |
|
|
(1,355 |
) |
|
|
(648 |
) |
Cumulative translation adjustments |
|
|
(3,067 |
) |
|
|
(1,321 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(4,422 |
) |
|
|
(1,969 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
|
585,772 |
|
|
|
525,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
809,304 |
|
|
$ |
747,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
THORATEC CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
95,098 |
|
|
$ |
69,222 |
|
|
$ |
194,370 |
|
|
$ |
133,851 |
|
Cost of product sales |
|
|
30,579 |
|
|
|
26,780 |
|
|
|
62,150 |
|
|
|
47,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
64,519 |
|
|
|
42,442 |
|
|
|
132,220 |
|
|
|
86,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
21,065 |
|
|
|
23,862 |
|
|
|
42,906 |
|
|
|
44,343 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
11,812 |
|
|
|
10,327 |
|
|
|
31,803 |
|
|
|
21,100 |
|
Amortization of purchased intangible assets |
|
|
2,468 |
|
|
|
2,359 |
|
|
|
4,880 |
|
|
|
5,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
35,345 |
|
|
|
36,548 |
|
|
|
79,589 |
|
|
|
70,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
29,174 |
|
|
|
5,894 |
|
|
|
52,631 |
|
|
|
16,275 |
|
Other income and (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and other |
|
|
(3,275 |
) |
|
|
(3,040 |
) |
|
|
(6,155 |
) |
|
|
(5,906 |
) |
Interest income and other |
|
|
1,293 |
|
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
|
2,899 |
|
|
|
2,244 |
|
Impairment on investment |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,046 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
27,146 |
|
|
|
4,167 |
|
|
|
47,329 |
|
|
|
12,613 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(9,609 |
) |
|
|
(1,281 |
) |
|
|
(16,428 |
) |
|
|
(3,558 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
|
17,537 |
|
|
|
2,886 |
|
|
|
30,901 |
|
|
|
9,055 |
|
Net loss from discontinued operations (net of
tax) |
|
|
(1,583 |
) |
|
|
(1,054 |
) |
|
|
(2,514 |
) |
|
|
(1,596 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
15,954 |
|
|
$ |
1,832 |
|
|
$ |
28,387 |
|
|
$ |
7,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used to compute net income (loss) per
share(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
57,635 |
|
|
|
55,789 |
|
|
|
57,139 |
|
|
|
55,658 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
66,436 |
|
|
|
57,161 |
|
|
|
65,986 |
|
|
|
57,014 |
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
(1) See Note 16, Net Income (Loss) Per Share, for the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share calculations using
the two-class method.
4
THORATEC CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash flows from continuing operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
30,901 |
|
|
$ |
9,055 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income from continuing operations to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
8,219 |
|
|
|
8,758 |
|
Investment premium amortization, net |
|
|
2,492 |
|
|
|
1,329 |
|
Loss on
extinguishment of senior subordinated convertible notes |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash expenses, net |
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
4,133 |
|
|
|
3,820 |
|
Impairment on investment |
|
|
2,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit related to stock options |
|
|
10,013 |
|
|
|
1,832 |
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
6,653 |
|
|
|
5,477 |
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
|
|
(9,265 |
) |
|
|
(1,594 |
) |
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
Change in net deferred tax liability |
|
|
(3,577 |
) |
|
|
(4,504 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
(4,325 |
) |
|
|
(1,860 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(6,032 |
) |
|
|
(5,057 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
(570 |
) |
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
8,328 |
|
|
|
(3,065 |
) |
Prepaid income taxes, net |
|
|
(21,780 |
) |
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities |
|
|
28,842 |
|
|
|
15,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from continuing investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of available-for-sale investments |
|
|
(300,576 |
) |
|
|
(90,237 |
) |
Sales of available-for-sale investments |
|
|
229,863 |
|
|
|
25,808 |
|
Maturities of available-for-sale investments |
|
|
32,090 |
|
|
|
44,773 |
|
Restricted cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
Purchases of patents |
|
|
(1,414 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(2,133 |
) |
|
|
(4,420 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in continuing investing activities |
|
|
(42,170 |
) |
|
|
(44,076 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from continuing financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
|
|
9,265 |
|
|
|
1,594 |
|
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
|
|
21,779 |
|
|
|
2,925 |
|
Proceeds from stock issued under employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
1,884 |
|
|
|
1,628 |
|
Repurchase and retirement of common shares |
|
|
(4,505 |
) |
|
|
(3,100 |
) |
Extinguishment
of senior subordinated convertible notes |
|
|
(5,345 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by continuing financing activities |
|
|
23,078 |
|
|
|
3,047 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations |
|
|
9,648 |
|
|
|
(25,994 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations at beginning of period |
|
|
27,787 |
|
|
|
108,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations at end of period |
|
$ |
37,435 |
|
|
$ |
82,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
2,495 |
|
|
$ |
1,950 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(1,746 |
) |
|
|
(1,535 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash from discontinued operations |
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
Bank overdraft from discontinued operations at beginning of period |
|
|
(1,326 |
) |
|
|
(1,335 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank overdraft from discontinued operations at end of period |
|
$ |
(577 |
) |
|
$ |
(920 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of consolidated cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for taxes |
|
$ |
29,562 |
|
|
$ |
4,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
1,707 |
|
|
$ |
1,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of consolidated non-cash investing and financing
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers of equipment from inventory |
|
$ |
2,029 |
|
|
$ |
1,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment through accounts payable
and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
THORATEC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
1. Operations and Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Thoratec Corporation
(we, our, us, or the Company) have been prepared and presented in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), without audit, and reflect all
adjustments necessary (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) to present fairly our
financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Certain information and footnote
disclosures normally included in our annual financial statements, prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, have been condensed or
omitted. The accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction with our fiscal 2009
consolidated financial statements, and the accompanying notes thereto, filed with the SEC in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K (the 2009 Annual Report). The operating results for any interim period
are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future period.
The preparation of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements necessarily
requires the Companys management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities on the
unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet dates and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses for the periods presented. The actual amounts could differ from those estimated amounts.
The financial information presented herein includes continuing operations, unless otherwise
stated. On April 25, 2010, our board of directors made a decision to sell International Technidyne
Corporation (ITC) and expects to complete this sale within a year. As such, in the second
quarter of 2010, ITC has met the conditions in Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Codification (ASC) 360, Property, Plant and Equipment, to be classified as
an asset held for sale for all periods presented, as described in Note 15, Assets Held for Sale.
Revenue Recognition and Product Warranty
We recognize revenue from product sales when evidence of an arrangement exists, and title has
passed (generally upon shipment) or services have been rendered, the selling price is fixed or
determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Sales to distributors are recorded when
title transfers.
The majority of our products are covered by up to a one-year limited manufacturers warranty.
Estimated contractual warranty obligations are recorded when related sales are recognized and any
additional amounts are recorded when such costs are probable, can be reasonably estimated and are
included in Cost of product sales. The change in accrued warranty expense is summarized in the
following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
1,777 |
|
|
$ |
705 |
|
|
$ |
1,706 |
|
|
$ |
554 |
|
Accruals for warranties issued |
|
|
1,182 |
|
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
1,931 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
Settlements made |
|
|
(1,212 |
) |
|
|
(631 |
) |
|
|
(1,890 |
) |
|
|
(1,258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
1,747 |
|
|
$ |
1,196 |
|
|
$ |
1,747 |
|
|
$ |
1,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
2. Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In July 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-20, Receivables
(Topic 320): Disclosures About Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit
Losses. ASU No. 2010-20 provides accounting guidance which expands disclosures regarding the
credit quality of an entitys receivables portfolio and its related allowance for credit losses.
This ASU No. 2010-20 amended guidance is effective for us commencing in the third quarter of 2011.
We are currently evaluating the effect of the amended guidance on our unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements.
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-17, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Milestone Method.
ASU No. 2010-17 provides guidance on the criteria that should be met for determining whether the
milestone method of revenue recognition is appropriate. Under the milestone method of revenue
recognition, consideration that is contingent upon achievement of a milestone in its entirety can
be recognized as revenue in the period in which the milestone is achieved only if the milestone
meets all criteria to be considered substantive. ASU No. 2010-17 provides the criteria to be met
for a milestone to be considered substantive which includes that: (i) performance consideration
earned by achieving the milestone be commensurate with either performance to achieve the milestone
or the enhancement of the value of the item delivered as a result of a specific outcome resulting
from performance to achieve the milestone; and (ii) relate to past performance and be reasonable
relative to all deliverables and payment terms in the arrangement. ASU No. 2010-17 is effective on
a prospective basis for us for milestones achieved on or after January 2, 2011. Earlier application
is permitted. We are currently evaluating the application date and the effect of the amended
guidance on our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
(Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. ASU No. 2010-06 amends ASC 820
and includes separate roll forward activity in Level 3 fair value measurements for purchases,
sales, issuances and settlements. This amendment is effective after fiscal year 2010. We are
currently evaluating the application of this standard on our unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605):
Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force),
which amends ASC 605-25, Revenue Recognition: Multiple-Element Arrangements. ASU No. 2009-13
addresses how to determine whether an arrangement involving multiple deliverables contains more
than one unit of accounting and how to allocate consideration to each unit of accounting in the
arrangement. This ASU replaces all references to fair value as the measurement criteria with the
term selling price and establishes a hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable.
ASU No. 2009-13 also eliminates the use of the residual value method for determining the allocation
of arrangement consideration. Additionally, ASU No. 2009-13 requires expanded disclosures. This ASU
will become effective for revenue arrangements entered into or
materially modified after our fiscal
year 2010. Earlier application is permitted with required transition disclosures based on the
period of adoption. We are currently evaluating the application date and the impact of this
standard on our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3. Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents are defined as short-term, highly liquid investments with original
maturities of 90 days or less at the date of purchase. The fair value of these investments was
determined by using quoted prices for identical investments in active
markets.
4. Investments in Available-for-Sale Securities
Our investment portfolio is comprised of short-term and long-term investments. Investments
classified as short-term available-for-sale consist primarily of municipal bonds, corporate bonds,
commercial paper and variable demand notes. All investments mature within two years or less from
the date of purchase. Investments with maturities beyond one year may be classified as short-term,
if they are available and intended for use in current operations, based on their highly liquid
nature or due to the frequency with which the interest rate is reset. Investments classified as
long-term available-for-sale consist of auction rate securities, whose underlying assets are
student loans. In addition, our long-term investments associated with the deferred compensation
plans are classified as trading and consist of the cash surrender value of our corporate owned life
insurance policies.
Our investments in available-for-sale securities are recorded at estimated fair value on our
financial statements, and the temporary differences between cost and estimated fair value are
presented as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive loss.
7
As
of July 3, 2010, we had unrealized gains before tax from our
investment in municipal bonds and
corporate bonds of $1.3 million and unrealized losses before tax from our
auction rate securities of $3.5 million.
The aggregate market value, cost basis and gross unrealized gains and losses for
available-for-sale investments as of July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010 by major security type are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
July 3, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
$ |
250,969 |
|
|
$ |
1,028 |
|
|
$ |
251,997 |
|
Variable demand notes |
|
|
45,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,605 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
13,865 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
14,130 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
2,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
313,431 |
|
|
$ |
1,293 |
|
|
$ |
314,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction rate securities |
|
$ |
27,700 |
|
|
$ |
(3,534 |
) |
|
$ |
24,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
$ |
196,650 |
|
|
$ |
1,526 |
|
|
$ |
198,176 |
|
Variable demand notes |
|
|
66,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,865 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
13,785 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
14,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
277,300 |
|
|
$ |
1,874 |
|
|
$ |
279,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction rate securities |
|
$ |
27,700 |
|
|
$ |
(3,066 |
) |
|
$ |
24,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 3, 2010, we owned approximately $27.7 million face amount of auction rate
securities classified as long-term. The assets underlying these investments are student loans
backed by the U.S. government under the Federal Family Education Loan Program or by private
insurers and are rated between A- and AAA. Historically, these securities have provided liquidity
through a Dutch auction process that resets the applicable interest rate periodically every seven
to thirty-five days. Beginning in February of 2008, these auctions began to fail. The principal
amount of these auction rate securities will not be accessible until future auctions for these
securities are successful, a secondary market is established, these securities are called for
redemption, or they are paid at maturity.
As a result of these auction failures, these auction rate securities do not have a readily
determinable market value. We estimated fair values as of July 3, 2010 using a discounted cash flow
model based on estimated interest rates, the present value of future principal and interest
payments discounted at rates considered to reflect current market conditions, and the credit
quality of the underlying securities. Specifically, our management estimated the future cash flows
over a five-year period, and applied a credit default rate to reflect the risk in the marketplace
for these investments has arisen due to the lack of an active market.
As of July 3, 2010 we recorded an estimated cumulative unrealized loss of $3.5 million ($2.1
million, net of tax) related to the temporary impairment of the auction rate securities, which was
included in accumulated other comprehensive loss within shareholders equity. In addition, our
management reviews impairments and credit losses associated with its investments, including auction
rate securities, to determine the classification of the impairment as temporary or
other-than-temporary and to bifurcate the credit and non-credit component of other-than-temporary
impairment event. We (i) do not intend to sell any of the auction rate securities prior to maturity
at an amount below the original purchase value; (ii) intend to
hold the investment to recovery and,
based on a more-likely-than-not probability assessment, will not be required to sell the security
before recovery; and (iii) deem that it is not probable that we will receive less than 100% of the
principal and accrued interest from the issuer. Therefore, 100% of the impairment was charged to
other comprehensive loss. Our auction rate securities are classified as long-term valued at $24.2
million using significant unobservable inputs. Subsequent to the second quarter of 2010 we
liquidated $3.0 million of our auction rate securities at par value through a successful auction.
8
If the issuers of the auction rate securities are unable to successfully complete future
auctions and their credit ratings deteriorate, we may in the future be required to record an
impairment charge to earnings on these investments. It could conceivably take until the final
maturity of the underlying notes (up to 30 years) to realize the investments carrying value.
The
aggregate market value of our trading investments included in our deferred compensation plan as of
July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
January 2, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Deferred compensation plan |
|
$ |
2,357 |
|
|
$ |
2,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The investments associated with the deferred compensation plans are included in Other
long-term assets on our condensed consolidated balance sheets at the fair value of the cash
surrender value of our corporate owned life insurance policies. The realized loss before tax from the change
in the fair value of the cash surrender value for the three months ended July 3, 2010 of
approximately $0.2 million and for the six months ended July 3, 2010 of approximately $80,000 is
included in Interest income and other.
5. Fair Value Measurements
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure, defines fair value as the price that would be
received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date. In determining fair value, we used various
approaches, including market, income and/or cost approaches, and each of these approaches requires
certain inputs. Fair value measurement establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair
value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by
requiring that observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources
independent of us. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect our assumptions as compared to the
assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best
information available in the circumstances.
We value our financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities based on the observability of
inputs used in the valuation of such assets and liabilities using the following fair value
hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of the information used to
determine fair values. Financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities carried or disclosed at
fair value were classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
|
|
|
Level 1:
|
|
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
Level 2:
|
|
Quoted prices of similar investments in active markets, of similar or identical
investments in markets that are not active or model based valuations for which all
significant inputs and value drivers are observable, directly or indirectly. |
|
|
|
Level 3:
|
|
Inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. |
9
The following table represents the hierarchy of our financial assets and financial liabilities
measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
|
Assets and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted prices in |
|
|
other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
at carrying |
|
|
Total |
|
|
active markets for |
|
|
observable |
|
|
unobservable |
|
|
|
value |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
identical assets |
|
|
inputs |
|
|
inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
$ |
251,997 |
|
|
$ |
251,997 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
251,997 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Variable demand notes |
|
|
45,605 |
|
|
|
45,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
14,130 |
|
|
|
14,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
2,992 |
|
|
|
2,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets mark to
market on foreign exchange instruments (Note 6) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments auction rate securities |
|
|
24,166 |
|
|
|
24,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,166 |
|
Other long-term assets deferred compensation plan |
|
|
2,357 |
|
|
|
2,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make-whole provision (Note 10) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
Assets and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
liabilities at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted prices in |
|
|
other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
carrying |
|
|
Total |
|
|
active markets for |
|
|
observable |
|
|
unobservable |
|
|
|
value |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
identical assets |
|
|
inputs |
|
|
inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
$ |
198,176 |
|
|
$ |
198,176 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
198,176 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Variable demand notes |
|
|
66,865 |
|
|
|
66,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
14,133 |
|
|
|
14,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets mark to
market on foreign exchange instruments (Note 6) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments auction rate securities |
|
|
24,634 |
|
|
|
24,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,634 |
|
Other long-term assets deferred compensation plan |
|
|
2,436 |
|
|
|
2,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make-whole provision (Note 10) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable Level 3
inputs consist of securities with an auction reset feature (auction rate securities) whose
underlying assets are student loans issued by various tax-exempt state agencies, most of which are
supported by federal government guarantees and some of which are supported by private insurers. To
estimate the fair value of the auction rate securities, the present value of future cash flows are
estimated by discounting future principal and interest payments over a five year period.
Significant inputs which vary by issuer include (1) basis point spread of 0.54% per annum (2)
credit default rate which ranges from 1.35% to 6.59% and (3) discount yield rate of 1.82%.
Our short-term available-for-sale investments, which are recorded at fair value, are valued
using quoted prices of similar or like securities that are traded in active markets. Our foreign
exchange instruments are measured at fair value using internal models based on observable market
inputs such as forward prices and exchange rates. Our long-term available-for-sale investments are
measured at fair value based on unobservable market inputs using a discounted cash flow model based
on estimated interest rates, the present value of future principal and interest payments discounted
at rates considered to reflect current market conditions, and the credit quality of the underlying
securities. Our carrying value of investments on our deferred compensation plan is recorded at
fair value of similar securities that are traded in markets that are not active.
10
The make-whole provision is measured at fair value, using valuation techniques, based on an
internal model using observable inputs such as our stock price, the volatility of our stock, and unobservable inputs such as the
probability of the Company being acquired and the probability of the type of consideration used by
a potential acquirer.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the
assets and liabilities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurement Using |
|
|
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs |
|
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
Auction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance at January 2, 2010 |
|
$ |
24,634 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
Unrealized holding gain on
make-whole provision, included in
interest income and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Unrealized holding loss on auction
rate securities, included in other
comprehensive income |
|
|
(688 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of April 3, 2010 |
|
$ |
23,946 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding loss on
make-whole provision, included in
interest income and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Unrealized holding gain on auction
rate securities, included in other
comprehensive income |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of July 3, 2010 |
|
$ |
24,166 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We continue to monitor the market for auction rate securities and consider its impact (if any)
on the fair value of our investments. If the current market conditions deteriorate further, or the
anticipated recovery in fair values does not occur, we may be required to record additional
unrealized losses in other comprehensive income or other-than-temporary impairment charges to the
condensed consolidated statements of operations in future periods.
In addition, we are using significant unobservable Level 3 inputs for the fair value of our
convertible debenture with Levitronix, LLC as of July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010 of $2.4 million
and $3.0 million, respectively. This convertible debenture is recorded at the carrying value of
$2.8 million as of both July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010, and is included in Other long-term
assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Levitronix repaid the receivable balance of
approximately $2.8 million in full on August 3, 2010.
Senior subordinated convertible notes measured at fair value on a recurring basis using Level
2 inputs include quoted prices of identical or similar liabilities and are measured at a fair value
of $316.8 million and $205.4 million, as of July 3,
2010 and January 2, 2010, respectively. The senior subordinated convertible notes have been reclassified to current liabilities
during the second quarter of 2010 due to a redemption feature which may require us to
repurchase all or a portion of the senior subordinated convertible notes as early as May
16, 2011. For a detailed discussion, see Note 10 Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes.
6. Foreign Exchange Instruments
We utilize foreign currency forward exchange contracts and options to mitigate against future
movements in foreign exchange rates that affect certain existing and forecasted foreign currency
denominated sales and purchase transactions (primarily assets and liabilities on our U.K.
subsidiarys consolidated balance sheet). We do not use derivative financial instruments for
speculative or trading purposes. We routinely hedge our exposure to certain foreign currencies with
various financial institutions in an effort to minimize the impact of certain currency exchange
rate fluctuations. If a financial counterparty to any of our hedging arrangements experiences
financial difficulties or is otherwise unable to honor the terms of the foreign currency forward
contract, we may experience material financial losses.
11
The impacts of the current foreign currency contracts with a maximum maturity of three months,
which do not qualify for hedge accounting, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Amounts |
|
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Purchases |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,414 |
|
Sales |
|
|
12,860 |
|
|
|
11,973 |
|
Effective January 3, 2010, we changed our functional currency for our U.K subsidiary from U.K
pounds to euros. This change did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated
financial statements: however the change did impact our foreign currency hedging contracts. As of
July 3, 2010, we owned forward contracts to sell euros to U.S. dollars with a notional value of
7.1 million, to sell U.S. dollars to euro with a notional value of $2.3 million and to sell U.K.
pounds to euros with a notional value of £1.0 million, as compared to July 4, 2009, when we owned
forward contracts to sell euros to U.S dollars with a notional value of 8.5 million and to
purchase U.K. pounds from U.S. dollars with a notional value of £5.1 million. As of July 3, 2010,
our forward contracts had an average exchange rate of one U.S. dollar to 1.2546 euros and one U.K.
pound to 1.2094 euros. The fair value of these contracts is $3,000 and is included in Prepaid
expenses and other assets in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.
The following represents our realized fair value of the foreign currency contracts and offsets
to the foreign currency exchange gains and losses which were included in Interest income and
other in the condensed consolidated statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Foreign currency exchange gain on foreign currency contracts |
|
$ |
482 |
|
|
$ |
487 |
|
|
$ |
746 |
|
|
$ |
935 |
|
Foreign currency exchange loss on foreign translation adjustments |
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
|
(498 |
) |
|
|
(626 |
) |
|
|
(1,448 |
) |
7. Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is based on the first in, first
out method and consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
January 2, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Finished goods |
|
$ |
10,102 |
|
|
$ |
12,920 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
11,739 |
|
|
|
7,350 |
|
Raw materials |
|
|
26,664 |
|
|
|
24,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
48,505 |
|
|
$ |
44,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Property, Plant and Equipment, net
Property, plant and equipment, net, consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
January 2, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Land, building and improvements |
|
$ |
18,305 |
|
|
$ |
18,134 |
|
Equipment and capitalized software |
|
|
39,316 |
|
|
|
38,281 |
|
Furniture and leasehold improvements |
|
|
21,052 |
|
|
|
20,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
78,673 |
|
|
|
77,070 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(41,567 |
) |
|
|
(39,955 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
37,106 |
|
|
$ |
37,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
9. Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets
The carrying amount of goodwill was $95.0 million as of July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010.
In February 2001, we merged with Thermo Cardiosystems, Inc. The components of identifiable
intangible assets related to the merger include: patents and trademarks, core technology (Thoralon,
our proprietary bio-material), and developed technology (patented technology, other than core
technology, acquired in the merger).
During the first quarter of 2010, we purchased patents at a fair value of $1.4 million, which
we capitalized under ASC 350, Intangibles Goodwill and Other. These patents have an estimated
useful life of approximately ten years.
The purchased intangibles on the condensed consolidated balance sheets are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Patents and trademarks |
|
$ |
40,832 |
|
|
$ |
(30,143 |
) |
|
$ |
10,689 |
|
Core technology |
|
|
37,180 |
|
|
|
(16,530 |
) |
|
|
20,650 |
|
Developed technology |
|
|
121,805 |
|
|
|
(59,735 |
) |
|
|
62,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchased intangible assets |
|
$ |
199,817 |
|
|
$ |
(106,408 |
) |
|
$ |
93,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Patents and trademarks |
|
$ |
39,418 |
|
|
$ |
(29,625 |
) |
|
$ |
9,793 |
|
Core technology |
|
|
37,180 |
|
|
|
(15,558 |
) |
|
|
21,622 |
|
Developed technology |
|
|
121,805 |
|
|
|
(56,344 |
) |
|
|
65,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchased intangible assets |
|
$ |
198,403 |
|
|
$ |
(101,527 |
) |
|
$ |
96,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense related to purchased intangible assets for the three months ended July 3,
2010 and July 4, 2009 was $2.5 million and $2.4 million, respectively. Amortization expense related
to purchased intangible assets for the six months ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009 was $4.9
million and $5.1 million, respectively. Our amortization expense is expected to be approximately
$9.7 million in 2010, declining to $8.7 million by 2014. This decline in amortization expense is
due to certain intangibles being fully amortized. Patents and trademarks have useful lives ranging
from eight to ten years, and core and developed technology assets have useful lives ranging from
zero to eleven years.
10.
Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes
In 2004, we completed the sale of $143.8 million initial principal amount of senior
subordinated convertible notes due in 2034. The convertible notes were sold to Qualified
Institutional Buyers pursuant to the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, provided by Rule 144A thereunder.
The senior subordinated convertible notes were issued at an issue price of $580.98 per note,
which is 58.098% of the principal amount at maturity of the notes. The senior subordinated
convertible notes bear interest at a rate of 1.3798% per year on the principal amount at maturity,
payable semi-annually in arrears in cash on May 16 and November 16 of each year, from November 16,
2004 until May 16, 2011. Beginning on May 16, 2011, the original issue discount will accrue daily
at a rate of 2.375% per year on a semi-annual bond equivalent basis and, on the maturity date, a
holder will receive $1,000 per note. As a result, the aggregate principal amount of the outstanding
notes at maturity will be $243.4 million.
13
Holders of the senior subordinated convertible notes may convert their convertible notes into
shares of our common stock at a conversion rate of 29.4652 shares per $1,000 principal amount of
senior subordinated convertible notes, which represents a conversion price of $19.72 per share,
subject to adjustments upon the occurrence of certain events as set forth in the indenture. Holders
have been and are able to convert their convertible notes at any point after the close of business
on October 30, 2004 if, as of the last day of the preceding calendar quarter, the closing price of
our common stock for at least 20 trading days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on
the last trading day of such preceding calendar quarter is more than 120% of the accreted
conversion price per share of our common stock. Commencing October 1, 2008, this market price
conversion feature was satisfied, such that holders of the senior subordinated convertible notes
may convert their notes through the final maturity date of the notes into shares of our common
stock at a conversion rate of 29.4652 shares per $1,000 principal amount of senior subordinated
convertible notes, subject to adjustments as provided in the indenture. If holders elect
conversion, we may, at our option, deliver shares of common stock, pay a holder in cash, or deliver
a combination of shares and cash, as determined pursuant to the terms of the notes. As of July 3,
2010, 4,035 bonds of the 247,427 bonds originally issued had been submitted to be converted and we
have elected to pay cash in lieu of shares for these bonds.
Holders may require us to repurchase all or a portion of their senior subordinated convertible
notes on each of May 16, 2011, 2014, 2019, 2024 and 2029 at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the
issue price, plus accrued original issue discount, if any. Based on this redemption feature, we reclassified the net carrying
amount of the senior subordinated notes to current liabilities during the second quarter of 2010. In addition, if we experience a change
in control or a termination of trading of our common stock each holder may require the Company to
purchase all or a portion of such holders notes at the same price, plus, in certain circumstances,
to pay a make-whole premium. This premium is considered an embedded derivative and has been
bifurcated from the senior subordinated convertible notes and recorded at its estimated fair value,
$15,000 as of July 3, 2010. There are significant variables and assumptions used in valuing the
make-whole provision including, but not limited to, our stock price, the volatility of our stock,
the probability of the Company being acquired and the probability of the type of consideration used
by a potential acquirer.
The senior subordinated convertible notes are subordinated to all of our senior indebtedness
and structurally subordinated to all indebtedness of our subsidiaries. Therefore, in the event of a
bankruptcy, liquidation or dissolution of the Company or one or more of our subsidiaries and
acceleration of or payment default on our senior indebtedness, holders of the convertible notes
will not receive any payment until holders of any senior indebtedness we may have outstanding have
been paid in full.
In accordance with ASC 470-20, Debt, which applies to certain convertible debt instruments
that may be settled in cash or other assets, or partially in cash, upon conversion, we recorded the debt and equity components on the senior subordinated convertible notes separately. This
accounting pronouncement increased interest expense associated with our senior subordinated
convertible notes by adding a non-cash component to amortize a debt discount calculated based on
the difference between the cash coupon rate (2.375% per year) of the senior subordinated
convertible notes and the effective interest rate on debt borrowing (9% per year). The discount,
which represents the non-cash interest expense, classified as interest expense on the condensed
consolidated statements of operations, is being amortized to interest expense over a seven-year
period ending May 16, 2011 (the expected life of the liability component) using the effective
interest method. Additionally, we allocated transaction costs on the same percentage as the
liability and equity component, such that a portion of the deferred debt issuance costs is
allocated to the liability component to be amortized using the effective interest method until May
16, 2011, and the equity component to be included in additional paid-in capital.
14
Interest expense primarily includes interest and amortization of discount related to senior
subordinated convertible notes as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Interest expense cash component |
|
$ |
847 |
|
|
$ |
853 |
|
|
$ |
1,701 |
|
|
$ |
1,706 |
|
Interest expense non-cash component |
|
|
2,052 |
|
|
|
1,910 |
|
|
|
4,139 |
|
|
|
3,820 |
|
The debt and equity component (recorded in additional paid-in-capital, net of income
tax benefit) consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
January 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Senior
subordinated convertible notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal amount |
|
$ |
141,406 |
|
|
$ |
143,750 |
|
Unamortized discount |
|
|
(7,524 |
) |
|
|
(11,821 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount |
|
$ |
133,882 |
|
|
$ |
131,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity component, net of income tax benefit |
|
$ |
25,325 |
|
|
$ |
28,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We may redeem either in whole or in part any of the senior subordinated convertible notes at
any time beginning May 16, 2011, by giving the holders at least 30 days notice, at a redemption
price equal to the sum of the issue price and the accrued original issue discount. If the holders
converted the senior subordinated convertible notes into shares of our stock as of July 3, 2010,
the if-converted value would be $309.8 million, based on our stock price of $43.20 per share on
July 2, 2010, which amount exceeds the original value of the bonds outstanding, or $141.4 million,
by $168.4 million. This if-converted value is $66.4 million more than the $243.4 million face
amount of the outstanding bonds at maturity in 2034.
The aggregate fair value of the senior subordinated convertible notes at July 3, 2010 was
$316.8 million.
11. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income refers to revenues, expenses, gains and losses that under generally
accepted accounting principles are included in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, a
component of shareholders equity within the condensed consolidated balance sheets, rather than the
condensed consolidated statements of operations. Under our existing accounting standards,
comprehensive income includes unrecognized gains and losses on investments and currency translation
adjustments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
17,537 |
|
|
$ |
2,886 |
|
|
$ |
30,901 |
|
|
$ |
9,055 |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on investments (net
of taxes of $31 and $1,595 for the three
months ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009,
respectively, and $471 and $1,531 for the six
months ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009,
respectively) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
2,393 |
|
|
|
(707 |
) |
|
|
2,297 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(940 |
) |
|
|
1,229 |
|
|
|
(1,746 |
) |
|
|
1,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income from continuing operations |
|
|
16,550 |
|
|
|
6,508 |
|
|
|
28,448 |
|
|
|
12,628 |
|
Comprehensive loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(1,583 |
) |
|
|
(1,054 |
) |
|
|
(2,514 |
) |
|
|
(1,596 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
14,967 |
|
|
$ |
5,454 |
|
|
$ |
25,934 |
|
|
$ |
11,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no reconciling items between net loss from discontinued operations and comprehensive
loss from discontinued operations.
15
12. Share-Based Compensation
Share-based compensation expense is measured based on the grant-date fair value of the
share-based awards. We recognize share-based compensation expense for the portion of the award that
is expected to vest over the requisite service period for those awards with graded vesting and
service conditions. We develop an estimate of the number of share-based awards which will
ultimately vest, primarily based on historical experience. The estimated forfeiture rate is
re-assessed periodically throughout the requisite service period. Such estimates are revised if
they differ materially from actual forfeitures. As required, the forfeiture estimates will be
adjusted to reflect actual forfeitures when an award vests.
Share-based compensation expense and related stock option and restricted stock award activity
is presented on a consolidated basis, unless otherwise presented as continuing operations and discontinued operations.
Share-based compensation included in the condensed consolidated
statements of operations consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Cost of product sales |
|
$ |
359 |
|
|
$ |
261 |
|
|
$ |
626 |
|
|
$ |
555 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
1,895 |
|
|
|
1,665 |
|
|
|
4,216 |
|
|
|
3,544 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
|
|
1,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation expense before taxes |
|
|
3,063 |
|
|
|
2,511 |
|
|
|
6,653 |
|
|
|
5,497 |
|
Tax benefit for share-based compensation expense |
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
1,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation continuing
operations (net of taxes) |
|
$ |
1,658 |
|
|
$ |
1,555 |
|
|
$ |
3,853 |
|
|
$ |
3,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation discontinued
operations (net of taxes) |
|
$ |
718 |
|
|
$ |
852 |
|
|
$ |
1,656 |
|
|
$ |
1,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009, share-based compensation expense of $0.3 million and $0.2
million, respectively, was capitalized to inventory.
We receive a tax deduction for certain stock option exercises during the period the options
are exercised, generally for the excess of the fair market value of the options at the date of
exercise over the exercise prices of the options. Our unaudited condensed consolidated statements
of cash flows presentation reports the excess tax benefits (i.e., windfall only for tax deductions
in excess of the share-based compensation expense recognized) as
financing cash flows of $9.3
million and $1.6 million for the six months ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009, respectively.
Cash proceeds from the exercise of stock options were $21.8 million and $2.9 million for the
six months ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009, respectively. Cash proceeds from our employee stock
purchase plan were $1.9 million and $1.6 million for the six months ended July 3, 2010 and July 4,
2009, respectively. The Company purchased $4.5 million and $3.1 million of restricted stock for
payment of income tax withholding due upon vesting for the six months ended July 3, 2010 and July
4, 2009, respectively.
16
Equity Plan
In April 2006, the Board of Directors approved the 2006 Incentive Stock Plan (2006 Plan).
In May 2006 the 2006 Plan was amended by the Board of Directors and approved by our shareholders,
in May 2008 the 2006 Plan was further amended by the Board of Directors and approved by our
shareholders and in May 2010 the 2006 Plan was further amended by the Board of Directors and
approved by our shareholders. The 2006 Plan allows us to grant to our employees, directors and
consultants up to a total of 8.6 million shares of stock awards. Each share issued from May 20,
2008 through May 18, 2010 as restricted stock bonuses, restricted stock units, phantom stock units,
performance share bonuses, or performance share units reduces the number of shares available for
issuance under the 2006 Plan by one and seventy-four hundredths (1.74) shares, and each share
issued as stock options, restricted stock purchases or stock appreciation rights reduced the shares
available for issuance under the 2006 Plan on a share-for-share basis. Each share issued from and
after May 19, 2010 as restricted stock bonuses, restricted stock units, phantom stock units,
performance share bonuses, or performance share units reduces the number of shares available for
issuance under the 2006 Plan by one and seven-tenths (1.7) shares, and each share issued as stock
options, restricted stock purchases or stock appreciation rights reduces the shares available for
issuance under the 2006 Plan on a share-for-share basis. During the six months ended July 3, 2010,
approximately 443,000 options were granted under the 2006 Plan at an exercise price equal to the
fair market value on the date of grant, and approximately 580,000 shares of restricted stock and
restricted stock units were granted under the 2006 Plan. As of July 3, 2010, approximately 3.9
million shares remained available for grant under the 2006 Plan.
Stock Options
Upon approval in May 2006, the 2006 Plan replaced our previous common stock option plans and
equity incentive plans. As of July 3, 2010, we had 2.9 million options issued and outstanding under
the 2006 Plan and the replaced plans. Options under the 2006 Plan may be granted by the Board of
Directors at the fair market value on the date of grant and generally become fully exercisable
within four years after the grant date and expire between five and ten years from the date of
grant. Vesting on some options granted to officers may be accelerated in certain circumstances
following a change in control of the Company.
The fair value of each option is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model with the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
Risk-free interest rate (weighted average) |
|
|
2.87 |
% |
|
|
2.97 |
% |
|
|
3.05 |
% |
|
|
2.32 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
53 |
% |
Expected option term (years) |
|
|
4.82 |
|
|
|
4.91 to 6.02 |
|
|
|
4.88 to 6.04 |
|
|
|
4.90 to 6.04 |
|
Dividends |
|
None |
|
|
None |
|
|
None |
|
|
None |
|
The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of
grant. The expected term of options represents the period of time that options are expected to be
outstanding. We use separate assumptions for groups of employees (for example, officers) that have
similar historical exercise behavior. The range above reflects the expected option impact of these
separate groups. We base the expected volatility on a combination of historical volatility trends
and market-based implied volatility because we have determined that this combination of historical
volatility trends and market-based implied trends are reflective of market conditions.
At July 3, 2010, there was $5.0 million of unrecognized compensation expense from continuing
operations, net of estimated forfeitures, related to stock options, which expense we expect to
recognize over a weighted average period of 1.63 years. At
July 3, 2010, there was $1.1 million of
unrecognized compensation expense from discontinued operations, net of estimated forfeitures,
related to stock options, which expense we expect to recognize over a weighted average period of
1.63 years. The aggregate intrinsic value of in-the-money options outstanding was $67.9 million,
based on the closing price of our common stock on July 2, 2010, the last trading day in the six
months ended July 3, 2010, of $43.20. As of July 3, 2010, the aggregate intrinsic value of options
currently exercisable was $48.8 million and the intrinsic value of options vested and expected to
vest was $66.7 million.
17
The total intrinsic value of options exercised for the three months ended July 3, 2010 and
July 4, 2009 was $27.3 million and $1.7 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options
exercised for the six months ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009 was $32.0 million and $2.6
million, respectively.
Stock option activity is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Average Exercise |
|
|
Remaining Contract |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Price Per Share |
|
|
Life (years) |
|
Outstanding options at January 2, 2010 |
|
|
3,857 |
|
|
$ |
17.29 |
|
|
|
5.60 |
|
Granted |
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
30.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,361 |
) |
|
|
16.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
19.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding options at July 3, 2010 |
|
|
2,908 |
|
|
$ |
19.83 |
|
|
|
6.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding options exercisable at July 3, 2010 |
|
|
1,897 |
|
|
$ |
17.49 |
|
|
|
4.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding options vested at July 3, 2010 and expected to vest |
|
|
2,724 |
|
|
$ |
19.42 |
|
|
|
5.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted during the six months ended July
3, 2010 and July 4, 2009 was $12.61 per share and $12.03 per share, respectively.
Restricted Stock Awards and Units
The 2006 Plan allows for the issuance of restricted stock awards and restricted stock units,
which awards or units may not be sold or otherwise transferred until certain restrictions have
lapsed. The unearned share-based compensation related to these awards is being amortized to
compensation expense over the period of the restrictions, generally four years. The expense for
these awards was determined based on the market price of our shares on the date of grant applied to
the total number of shares that were granted.
Restricted Stock Awards
Share-based compensation expense from continuing operations related to restricted stock awards
was $1.7 million for the six months ended July 3, 2010. As of July 3, 2010, we had $2.8 million of
unrecognized compensation expense from continuing operations, net of estimated forfeitures, related
to restricted stock awards, which amount we expect to recognize over 1.29 years. As of July 3,
2010, we had $0.9 million of unrecognized compensation expense from discontinued operations, net of
estimated forfeitures, related to restricted stock awards, which amount we expect to recognize over
1.29 years. There were no restricted stock awards granted during the six months ended July 3, 2010.
Restricted stock activity is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Grant Date Fair |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Value |
|
Outstanding unvested restricted stock at January 2, 2010 |
|
|
609 |
|
|
$ |
16.63 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(264 |
) |
|
|
17.08 |
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
16.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding unvested restricted stock at July 3, 2010 |
|
|
327 |
|
|
$ |
16.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Units
Share-based compensation expense from continuing operations related to restricted stock units
was $2.5 million for the six months ended July 3, 2010. As of July 3, 2010, we had $15.0 million of
unrecognized compensation expense from continuing operations, net of estimated forfeitures, related
to restricted stock units, which amount we expect to recognize over 3.30 years. As of July 3, 2010,
we had $4.6 million of unrecognized compensation expense from discontinued operations, net of
estimated forfeitures, related to restricted stock units, which amount we expect to recognize over
3.30 years. The aggregate intrinsic value of the units outstanding, based on our stock price on
July 2, 2010, was $38.2 million.
18
Restricted stock unit activity is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Units |
|
|
Grant Date Fair |
|
|
Remaining Contract |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Life (in years) |
|
Outstanding units at January 2, 2010 |
|
|
463 |
|
|
$ |
24.17 |
|
|
|
3.12 |
|
Granted |
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
30.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
Released |
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
25.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
25.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding units at July 3, 2010 |
|
|
885 |
|
|
$ |
28.34 |
|
|
|
3.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
In May 2002, our shareholders approved our Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) under which
500,000 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance. In addition, the ESPP provides for an
annual, automatic increase of up to 250,000 shares in the total number of shares available for
issuance thereunder on March 1 of each year, unless our Board of Directors specifies a smaller
increase or no increase. Under this provision, an additional 250,000 shares were reserved for
issuance under the ESPP on each of March 1, 2006, March 1, 2008 and March 1, 2009; our Board of
Directors specified no increase as of each other year. Eligible employees may purchase a limited
number of shares, over a six month period, of our common stock at 85% of the lower of the market
value on the offering date or the market value on the purchase date. During the six months ended
July 3, 2010, 83,791 shares of common stock were issued under the ESPP. As of July 3, 2010,
approximately 215,909 shares remained available for issuance under this plan.
The estimated subscription date fair value of the current offering under the ESPP is
approximately $0.6 million using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
0.25 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
43 |
% |
Expected option life |
|
0.50 years |
Dividends |
|
None |
|
As of July 3, 2010, there was approximately $0.2 million of unrecognized compensation expense
from continuing operations and $0.2 million of unrecognized expense
from discontinued operations related to ESPP subscriptions that began on May 1, 2010, which amount we
expect to recognize during the second half of 2010.
13. Income Taxes
Our effective income tax rates for the three months ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009, were 35.4% and 30.7%, respectively. Our
effective income tax rates for the six months ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009 were 34.7% and 28.2%, respectively. The increase in our reported income tax rates are primarily due to the reduced impact that tax exempt income has on our tax rate due to our
pretax increase in earnings. In addition, federal research credits which
were available in 2009 are not currently available in 2010 as a result of the expiration of federal research credit legislation. Also in the first quarter of 2009, we recorded a discrete benefit to reflect the
change in California tax law that will permit us to make a beneficial apportionment election in 2011.
During the next twelve months, it is reasonably possible that audit resolutions and the
expiration of statutes of limitations could potentially reduce our unrecognized tax benefits by up
to $4.8 million. However, this amount may change because we continue to have ongoing negotiations
with various taxing authorities throughout the year.
19
14. Geographic Information
Our
functional entities operate in two segments: Cardiovascular and ITC.
Due to our intent to sell ITC, segment disclosure is no longer presented. For a discussion of our ITC segment,
which is classified as discontinued operations, refer to Note 15, Assets Held for Sale. Our
Cardiovascular segment is classified as continuing operations.
Our geographic information for our product revenue sold by our continuing operations to the
domestic and international markets is discussed below.
Revenue attributed to a country or region includes product sales to hospitals, physicians and
distributors and is based on final destination where the products are sold. During the three and
six months ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009, no customer or international country represented
individually greater than 10% of the Companys total product sales. The geographic composition of
the Companys product sales from continuing operations was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
Domestic |
|
$ |
79,906 |
|
|
$ |
56,014 |
|
|
$ |
162,144 |
|
|
$ |
108,032 |
|
International |
|
|
15,192 |
|
|
|
13,208 |
|
|
|
32,226 |
|
|
|
25,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total product
sales from
continuing
operations |
|
$ |
95,098 |
|
|
$ |
69,222 |
|
|
$ |
194,370 |
|
|
$ |
133,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. Assets Held For Sale
On April 25, 2010, we entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement to sell the ITC division to
Danaher Corporation (Danaher) for $110.0 million in cash upon closing, subject to certain
purchase price adjustments as set forth in the agreement. As such,
the ITC division is
classified as held for sale on the condensed consolidated balance
sheets as of July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010 and its
results of operations displayed in discontinued operations for all periods presented.
On July 26, 2010, the sale was terminated as a result of the failure of the parties to agree
on the status of certain aspects of ITCs quality system and regulatory filings. We expect to
locate another buyer and complete the sale of ITC within the next twelve months.
The results of the ITC business are included in discontinued operations in the second quarter
and first half of 2010 and 2009 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
24,182 |
|
|
$ |
22,836 |
|
|
$ |
46,488 |
|
|
$ |
47,674 |
|
Cost of product sales |
|
|
16,723 |
|
|
|
14,523 |
|
|
|
30,857 |
|
|
|
29,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
7,459 |
|
|
|
8,313 |
|
|
|
15,631 |
|
|
|
17,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
7,551 |
|
|
|
6,914 |
|
|
|
14,179 |
|
|
|
13,887 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
3,019 |
|
|
|
3,099 |
|
|
|
6,096 |
|
|
|
6,412 |
|
Amortization of purchased intangible assets |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
10,637 |
|
|
|
10,222 |
|
|
|
20,544 |
|
|
|
20,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(3,178 |
) |
|
|
(1,909 |
) |
|
|
(4,913 |
) |
|
|
(2,735 |
) |
Other income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(3,075 |
) |
|
|
(1,585 |
) |
|
|
(4,709 |
) |
|
|
(2,355 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
1,492 |
|
|
|
531 |
|
|
|
2,195 |
|
|
|
759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(1,583 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,054 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,514 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,596 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
The
assets and liabilities of ITC are classified as held for sale as of July
3, 2010 and
January 2, 2010. Such amounts are comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
January 2, 2010 (1) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net of allowances of $383 and $522, respectively |
|
$ |
14,591 |
|
|
$ |
18,030 |
|
Inventories (1) |
|
|
22,272 |
|
|
|
22,300 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
37,495 |
|
|
|
41,211 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net (2) |
|
|
15,783 |
|
|
|
14,737 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
4,271 |
|
|
|
4,271 |
|
Purchased intangible assets, net |
|
|
2,715 |
|
|
|
2,984 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets held for sale |
|
$ |
60,848 |
|
|
$ |
63,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank overdraft |
|
$ |
577 |
|
|
$ |
1,326 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
2,891 |
|
|
|
2,310 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
4,647 |
|
|
|
4,990 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
2,550 |
|
|
|
2,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
10,665 |
|
|
|
10,931 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
1,419 |
|
|
|
1,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities related to assets held for sale |
|
$ |
12,084 |
|
|
$ |
12,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Management has elected to classify the assets and liabilities
of ITC as held for sale as of January 2, 2010 to conform to current
presentation. |
|
(2) |
|
Inventories classified as held for sale consisted of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
January 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Finished goods |
|
$ |
4,740 |
|
|
$ |
5,083 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
2,885 |
|
|
|
3,068 |
|
Raw materials |
|
|
14,647 |
|
|
|
14,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
22,272 |
|
|
$ |
22,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net, classified as held for sale consisted of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
January 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Land, building and improvements |
|
$ |
4,600 |
|
|
$ |
4,606 |
|
Equipment and capitalized software |
|
|
36,841 |
|
|
|
35,465 |
|
Furniture and leasehold improvements |
|
|
3,176 |
|
|
|
3,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
44,617 |
|
|
|
43,169 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(28,834 |
) |
|
|
(28,432 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
15,783 |
|
|
$ |
14,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
16. Net Income (Loss) Per Share
On
January 4, 2009, we adopted authoritative accounting guidance that requires participating securities to be
included in the calculation of the net income (loss) per share using the two-class method. Our
restricted share awards subject to repurchase and settled in shares of common stock upon vesting
have non-forfeitable rights to receive dividends on an equal basis with common stock and therefore
are considered participating securities. Under the two-class method, basic and diluted net income
(loss) per common share is determined by calculating net income (loss) per share for common stock
and participating securities based on participation rights in undistributed earnings. Dilutive net
income (loss) per common share also considers the dilutive effect of the in-the-money stock options
and restricted stock units, calculated using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock
method, the amount of assumed proceeds from unexercised stock options and restricted stock units
includes the amount of unrecognized compensation cost attributable to future services, assumed
proceeds from the exercise of the options, and the incremental income tax benefit or liability that
would be recorded in additional-paid-in capital when the award becomes deductible.
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share attributable to common shareholders under
the two-class method were calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Basic net income per share calculation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
17,537 |
|
|
$ |
2,886 |
|
|
$ |
30,901 |
|
|
$ |
9,055 |
|
Net income from continuing operations allocated
to participating securities |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(224 |
) |
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
17,434 |
|
|
$ |
2,851 |
|
|
$ |
30,677 |
|
|
$ |
8,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(1,583 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,054 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,514 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,596 |
) |
Net loss
from discontinued operations
allocated to participating securities |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from discontinued operations
attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(1,574 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,041 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,496 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,574 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
15,954 |
|
|
$ |
1,832 |
|
|
$ |
28,387 |
|
|
$ |
7,459 |
|
Net income allocated to participating securities |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
15,860 |
|
|
$ |
1,810 |
|
|
$ |
28,181 |
|
|
$ |
7,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares used
to compute basic net income per common share |
|
|
57,635 |
|
|
|
55,789 |
|
|
|
57,139 |
|
|
|
55,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per common share from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Diluted net income(loss) per common share
calculation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
17,537 |
|
|
$ |
2,886 |
|
|
$ |
30,901 |
|
|
$ |
9,055 |
|
Interest expense on senior subordinated
convertible notes (after tax) |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for diluted share calculation |
|
|
19,287 |
|
|
|
2,886 |
|
|
|
34,425 |
|
|
|
9,055 |
|
Net income from continuing operations allocated
to participating securities |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(218 |
) |
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
19,188 |
|
|
$ |
2,852 |
|
|
$ |
34,207 |
|
|
$ |
8,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(1,583 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,054 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,514 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,596 |
) |
Net income
from discontinued operations
allocated to participating securities |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from discontinued operations
attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(1,574 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,041 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,496 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,574 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
15,954 |
|
|
$ |
1,832 |
|
|
$ |
28,387 |
|
|
$ |
7,459 |
|
Interest expense on senior subordinated
convertible notes (after tax) |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for diluted share calculation |
|
|
17,704 |
|
|
|
1,832 |
|
|
|
31,911 |
|
|
|
7,459 |
|
Net income allocated to participating securities |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
17,613 |
|
|
$ |
1,810 |
|
|
$ |
31,709 |
|
|
$ |
7,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares used to
compute basic net income (loss) per common share
attributable to common shares |
|
|
57,635 |
|
|
|
55,789 |
|
|
|
57,139 |
|
|
|
55,658 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock-based compensation plans |
|
|
1,540 |
|
|
|
1,372 |
|
|
|
1,571 |
|
|
|
1,356 |
|
Dilutive effect on conversion of senior
subordinated convertible notes |
|
|
7,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares used to
compute diluted net income (loss) per common
share |
|
|
66,436 |
|
|
|
57,161 |
|
|
|
65,986 |
|
|
|
57,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per common share from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average unvested restricted stock awards outstanding were 342,305 and 679,138 for
the three months ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009, respectively. The weighted average unvested
restricted stock awards outstanding were 418,432 and 767,653 for the six months ended July 3, 2010
and July 4, 2009, respectively.
23
Subsequent to the original issuance of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements for the period ended July 4, 2009, management determined that the net income (loss) per
share calculations for the three and six months ended July 4, 2009 did not properly reflect the
restricted share awards as participating securities under the two-class method and thus were
inappropriately reflected in the number of common shares to be used in the computation of net
income (loss) per share. The change to the calculation of the two-class method had no impact on the reported net
income (loss) per share for the three and six months ended July 4, 2009. The change to the calculation of the
two-class method resulted in a decrease in the shares reported as used in the computation of both
basic and diluted net income (loss) per share of approximately 679,000 and 768,000 for the three
and six months ended July 4, 2009, respectively. The shares previously included in the
calculations of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share for the three months and six months
ended July 4, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Basic |
|
|
56,468 |
|
|
|
56,426 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
57,840 |
|
|
|
57,782 |
|
Potential common share equivalents excluded where the inclusion would be anti-dilutive are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Options to
purchase
shares not
included in
the
computation
of diluted
income per
share because
their
inclusion
would be
anti-dilutive |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
The computation of diluted net income per common share for the three and six months ended July
4, 2009 excludes the effect of assuming the conversion of our senior subordinated convertible
notes, which are convertible at $19.72 per share into 7.3 million shares of common stock, because
the effect would have been anti-dilutive.
24
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended. These statements can be identified by the words expects, projects,
hopes, believes, intends, should, estimate, will, would, may, anticipates,
plans, could and other similar words. Actual results, events or performance could differ
materially from these forward-looking statements based on a variety of factors, many of which are
beyond our control. Therefore, readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on these statements.
Factors that could cause actual results or conditions to differ from those anticipated by these and
other forward-looking statements include those more fully described in the Risk Factors section
of our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K (the 2009 Annual Report) and in other documents we file
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). These forward-looking statements speak only as
of the date hereof. We are not under any obligation, and we expressly disclaim any obligation, to
publicly release any revisions or updates to these forward-looking statements that may be made to
reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof, or to reflect the occurrence of
unanticipated events.
The following presentation of managements discussion and analysis of our financial condition
and results of operations should be read together with our unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
OVERVIEW
Continuing Operations Cardiovascular Business
Thoratec Corporation (we, our, us, or the Company) is the world leader in mechanical
circulatory support with a product portfolio to treat the full range of clinical needs for advanced
heart failure patients. We develop, manufacture and market proprietary medical devices used for
circulatory support.
For advanced heart failure (HF), we develop, manufacture and market proprietary medical
devices used for mechanical circulatory support (MCS). Our primary product lines are our
ventricular assist devices (VADs): the Thoratec Paracorporeal Ventricular Assist Device (PVAD),
the Thoratec Implantable Ventricular Assist Device (IVAD), the HeartMate Left Ventricular Assist
System (HeartMate XVE), and the HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist System (HeartMate II). We
refer to the PVAD and the IVAD collectively as the Thoratec product line and we refer to the
HeartMate XVE and the HeartMate II collectively as the HeartMate product line. The PVAD, IVAD,
HeartMate XVE and HeartMate II are approved by the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and are
Conformite Europeene (CE) Mark approved in Europe. In addition, for acute HF we market the
CentriMag Blood Pumping System (CentriMag), which is manufactured by Levitronix LLC
(Levitronix) and distributed by us in the U.S. under a distribution agreement with Levitronix. We
also manufacture a vascular access graft for renal dialysis.
VADs supplement the pumping function of the heart in patients with advanced HF. In most cases,
a cannula connects the left ventricle of the heart to a blood pump. Blood flows from the left
ventricle to the pump chamber via the cannula, powered by an electric or air driven mechanism that
drives the blood through another cannula into the aorta. From the aorta, the blood then circulates
throughout the body. Mechanical or tissue valves enable unidirectional flow in some devices.
Currently, the power source remains outside the body for all FDA-approved VADs.
Certain VADs are implanted internally, while others are placed outside the body. Some external
devices are placed immediately adjacent to the body (paracorporeal), while other external VADs are
positioned at a distance from the body (extracorporeal).
In addition to our MCS devices, we sell vascular access graft products used in hemodialysis
for patients with late-stage renal disease.
Our product portfolio of implantable and external MCS devices and graft products is described
below.
25
The HeartMate II
The HeartMate II is an implantable, electrically powered, continuous flow, left ventricular
assist device consisting of a miniature rotary blood pump designed to provide intermediate and
long-term MCS. The HeartMate II is designed to improve survival and quality of life and to provide
five to ten years of circulatory support for a broad range of advanced HF patients. Significantly
smaller than the HeartMate XVE and with only one moving part, the HeartMate II is simpler and
designed to operate more quietly than pulsatile devices. Effective January 20, 2010, the HeartMate
II can be used in patients with New York Heart Association Class IIIB and IV end-stage left
ventricular failure who have received optimal medical therapy for at least forty-five of the last
sixty days, and who are not candidates for cardiac transplantation.
HeartMate II received FDA approval in April 2008 for bridge-to-transplantation (BTT) and
received FDA approval for use in HF patients who are not eligible for heart transplantation
(Destination Therapy or DT) in January 2010. In November 2005, the HeartMate II received CE
Mark approval, allowing for its commercial sale in Europe. In May 2009, the HeartMate II was
approved in Canada.
During the third quarter of 2009 we launched our new HeartMate external peripherals (Go-Gear),
including new batteries, charger and power module, which are designed to provide an enhanced
quality of life for HeartMate patients by providing them more freedom and mobility and the ability
to more easily resume many aspects of a normal lifestyle.
The HeartMate XVE
The HeartMate XVE is an implantable, pulsatile, left ventricular assist device for
intermediate and longer-term MCS. Patients with a HeartMate XVE do not require anticoagulation
drugs, other than aspirin, because of the products incorporation of proprietary textured surfaces
and tissue valves. The system is comprised of the blood pump and a wearable controller and
batteries providing a high degree of patient freedom and mobility.
The HeartMate XVE received FDA approval for BTT in December 2001 and for Destination Therapy
in April 2003. In June 2003, the HeartMate XVE received CE Mark approval, allowing for its
commercial sale in Europe. In June 2004, the HeartMate XVE was approved in Canada.
The Paracorporeal Ventricular Assist Device
The PVAD is an external, pulsatile, ventricular assist device, FDA approved for BTT, including
home discharge, and post-cardiotomy myocardial recovery and provides left, right and biventricular
MCS. The PVAD is a paracorporeal device that is less invasive than implantable VADs since only the
cannula is implanted. The paracorporeal nature of the PVAD has several benefits including shorter
implantation times (approximately two hours) and the ability to use the device in smaller patients.
A pneumatic power source drives the PVAD. It is designed for short-to-intermediate duration
use of a few weeks to several months, although this device has supported numerous patients for nine
to eighteen months. Offering left, right or biventricular support, the PVAD and the IVAD, described
below, are the only biventricular support systems approved for use as BTT. This characteristic is
significant because approximately 50% of BTT patients treated with the PVAD and the IVAD require
right as well as left-sided ventricular assistance. The PVAD and the IVAD are also the only devices
approved for both BTT and recovery following cardiac surgery. The PVAD incorporates our proprietary
biomaterial, Thoralon, which has excellent tissue and blood compatibility and is resistant to blood
clots.
The PVAD received FDA approval for BTT in December 1995 and for recovery (post-cardiotomy) in
May 1998. In June 1998, the PVAD received CE Mark approval, allowing for its commercial sale in
Europe. In November 1994, the PVAD was approved in Canada.
26
The Implantable Ventricular Assist Device
The IVAD is an implantable, pulsatile, ventricular assist device FDA approved for BTT,
including home discharge, and post-cardiotomy myocardial recovery and provides left, right or
biventricular MCS. The IVAD maintains the same blood flow path, valves and blood pumping mechanism
as the PVAD, but has an outer housing made of a titanium alloy that makes it suitable for
implantation.
The IVAD received FDA approval for BTT and recovery (post-cardiotomy) in August 2004. In June
2003, the IVAD received CE Mark approval, allowing for its commercial sale in Europe. In November
2004, the IVAD was approved in Canada.
The CentriMag
The CentriMag is manufactured by Levitronix and is based on their magnetically levitated
bearingless motor technology. We entered into a distribution agreement with Levitronix in August
2007, with an initial term effective through December 2011, to distribute the CentriMag in the U.S.
The CentriMag is 510(k) cleared by the FDA for use up to six hours in patients requiring short-term
extracorporeal circulatory support during cardiac surgery. Additionally, CentriMag is approved
under a FDA humanitarian device exemption to be used as a right ventricular assist device for
periods of support up to thirty days in patients in cardiogenic shock due to acute right
ventricular failure. In May 2008, Levitronix received approval to commence a U.S. pivotal trial to
demonstrate safety and effectiveness of the CentriMag for periods of support up to thirty days.
Levitronix has CE Mark approval in Europe to market the product to provide support for up to thirty
days.
Vascular Graft Products
The Vectra Vascular Access Graft (Vectra) was approved for sale in the U.S. in December 2000
and in Europe in January 1998. It is designed for use as a shunt between an artery and a vein,
primarily to provide access to the bloodstream for renal hemodialysis patients requiring frequent
needle punctures during treatment.
Discontinued Operations International Technidyne Corporation (ITC)
Our
ITC division develops, manufactures and markets two product lines:
|
|
|
Point-of-Care Diagnostics. Our point-of-care products include diagnostic test systems
that monitor blood coagulation while a patient is being administered certain anticoagulants,
as well as monitor blood gas/electrolytes, oxygenation and chemistry status. |
|
|
|
|
Incision. Our incision products include devices used to obtain a patients blood sample
for diagnostic testing and screening for platelet function. |
On April 25, 2010, we entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement to sell the ITC division to
Danaher Corporation (Danaher) for $110.0 million in cash upon closing, subject to certain
purchase price adjustments as set forth in the agreement. As such,
the ITC division is
classified as held for sale on the condensed consolidated balance
sheet as of July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010 and its results of operations displayed in discontinued operations for all periods
presented.
On July 26, 2010, the sale was terminated as a result of the failure of the parties to agree
on the status of certain aspects of ITCs quality system and regulatory filings. We expect to
locate another buyer and complete the sale of ITC within the next twelve months.
27
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We have identified the policies and estimates below as critical to our business operations and
the understanding of our results of operations. The impact of, and any associated risks related to,
these policies and estimates on our business operations are discussed below. Preparation of
financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amount of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from those estimates and
assumptions.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue from product sales when evidence of an arrangement exists, title has
passed (generally upon shipment) or services have been rendered, the selling price is fixed or
determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Sales to distributors are recorded when
title transfers.
We recognize sales of certain products to first-time customers when it has been determined
that the customer has the ability to use the products. These sales frequently include the sale of
products and training services under multiple element arrangements. Training is not considered
essential to the functionality of the products. Revenue under these arrangements is allocated to
training based upon fair market value of the training, which is typically performed on our behalf
by third party providers. Under this method, the total value of the arrangement is allocated to the
training and the products based on the relative fair market value of the training and products.
In determining when to recognize revenue, management makes decisions on such matters as the
fair values of the product and training elements when sold together, customer credit worthiness and
warranty reserves. If any of these decisions proves incorrect, the carrying value of these assets
and liabilities on our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets or the recorded product
sales could be significantly different, which could have a material adverse effect on our results
of operations for any fiscal period.
Reserves
We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability
of our customers to make payments owed to us for product sales and training services. If the
financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their
ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.
The majority of our products are covered by up to a one-year limited manufacturers warranty
from the date of shipment or installation. Estimated contractual warranty obligations are recorded
when the related sales are recognized and any additional amounts are recorded when such costs are
probable and can be reasonably estimated, at which time they are included in Cost of product
sales in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. In determining the
warranty reserve estimate, management makes judgments and estimates on such matters as repair costs
and probability of warranty obligations.
Estimated excess and obsolete inventory charges are recorded when inventory levels exceed
projected sales volume for a certain period of time. In determining the excess obsolete charges,
management makes judgments and estimates on matters such as forecasted sales volume. If sales
volume does not meet projections, additional write-downs may be required.
Management must make estimates and judgments to determine the amount of reserves to accrue. If
any of these decisions proves incorrect, our condensed consolidated financial statements could be
materially and adversely affected.
28
Income Taxes
We make certain estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense for financial
statement purposes. These estimates and judgments occur in the calculation of tax credits, benefits
and deductions, such as tax benefits from our non-U.S. operations and in the calculation of certain
tax assets and liabilities, which arise from differences in the timing of revenue and expense for
tax and financial statement purposes.
We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to an amount that
more-likely-than-not will be realized. While we have considered future taxable income and ongoing
prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance, in
the event we were to determine that we would be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the
future in excess of our net recorded amount, an adjustment to the allowance for the deferred tax
asset would increase income in the period such determination was made. Likewise, should we
determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax asset in the
future, an adjustment to the valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset would be charged to
income in the period such determination was made.
We believe we have provided adequate reserves for uncertain tax positions for anticipated
audit adjustments by U.S. federal, state and local, as well as foreign, tax authorities based on
our estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes, interest and penalties may be
due. If events occur which indicate payment of these amounts is unnecessary, the reversal of the
liabilities would result in tax benefits being recognized in the period when we determine the
accrued liabilities are no longer warranted. If our estimate of tax liabilities proves to be less
than the ultimate assessment, a further charge to expense would result.
Evaluation of Purchased Intangible Assets and Goodwill for Impairment
We periodically evaluate the carrying value of long-lived assets to be held and used,
including intangible assets subject to amortization, when events or circumstances warrant such a
review. The carrying value of a long-lived asset to be held and used is considered impaired when
the anticipated separately-identifiable undiscounted cash flows to be generated by such an asset
are less than the carrying value of the asset. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the
amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the long-lived asset. Fair value is
determined primarily using the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the
risk involved. Management must make estimates of these future cash flows, and if necessary, the
approximate discount rate, and if any of these estimates proves incorrect, the carrying value of
these assets on our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets could become significantly
impaired.
Purchased intangible assets with indefinite lives and goodwill are not amortized but are
subject to annual impairment tests. If there was impairment, a new fair value would be determined.
If the new fair value is less than the carrying amount, an impairment loss would be recognized.
Valuation of Share-Based Awards
Share-based compensation expense is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award
and is recognized as expense over the vesting period. Determining the fair value of option awards
at the grant date requires judgment, including estimating the expected term of stock options, the
expected volatility of our stock, expected forfeitures and expected dividends. The computation of
the expected volatility assumption used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model for option grants
is based on a combination of our historical volatility and market-based implied volatility. When
establishing the expected life assumption, we review annual historical employee exercise behavior
of option grants with similar vesting periods. In addition, judgment is also required in estimating
the amount of share-based awards that are expected to be forfeited. If actual forfeitures differ
significantly from these estimates, share-based compensation expense and our results of operations
could be materially affected.
29
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer
a liability (exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement
date.
In determining fair value, we use various approaches, including market, income and/or cost
approaches, and each of these approaches requires certain inputs. Fair value measurement standards
establish a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable
inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that observable inputs be used
when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the
asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources independent of us. Unobservable
inputs are inputs that reflect our assumptions as compared to the assumptions market participants
would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best information available in the
circumstances. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as
follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities that we have the ability to access. Assets and liabilities utilizing Level 1
inputs include broker-dealer quoted securities that are traded in an active market. Since
valuations are based on quoted prices that are readily and regularly available in an active
market, a significant degree of judgment is not required. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Valuations based on quoted prices of similar investments in active markets,
of similar or identical investments in markets that are not active or model based
valuations for which all significant inputs and value drivers are observable, directly or
indirectly. Assets and liabilities utilizing Level 2 inputs primarily include municipal
bonds, variable demand notes, corporate bonds, commercial paper, carrying value of
investments on our deferred compensation plan and our senior subordinated convertible
notes, except the make-whole provision, which uses Level 3 inputs, described below. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the
overall fair value measurement. Assets and liabilities utilizing Level 3 inputs include
auction rate securities, our convertible debenture with Levitronix, our purchased
intangible asset valuations and the make-whole feature of our senior subordinated
convertible notes. Given the current credit market illiquidity for auction rate securities,
our estimates are subject to significant judgment by management. |
Fair value is a market-based measure considered from the perspective of a market participant
who holds the asset or owes the liability rather than an entity-specific measure. Therefore, even
when market assumptions are not readily available, our own assumptions are developed to reflect
those that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date.
See Note 5, Fair Value Measurements, to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
for further information about our financial assets that are accounted for at fair value.
Due to the uncertainty inherent in the valuation process, estimates of fair value may differ
significantly from the values that would have been obtained had an active market for the securities
existed, and the differences could be material. After determining the fair value of our
available-for-sale securities, gains or losses on these investments are recorded to other
comprehensive income, until either the investment is sold or we determine that the decline in value
is other-than-temporary. Determining whether the decline in fair value is other-than-temporary
requires management judgment based on the specific facts and circumstances of each investment. For
investments in available-for-sale securities, these judgments primarily consider: our ability and
intent to hold the investment to maturity, whether it is more-likely-than-not that we would be
required to sell the investment before recovery of the investments amortized cost basis and whether
we expect to recover the amortized cost basis of the investment. Given the current market
conditions, these judgments could prove to be incorrect, and companies with relatively high credit
ratings and solid financial conditions may not be able to fulfill their obligations. In addition,
if we decide not to hold an investment until its value recovers it may result in the recognition of
an other-than-temporary impairment.
30
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth selected condensed consolidated statements of operations data
for the periods indicated and as a percentage of total product sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except for percentage data) |
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
95,098 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
69,222 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
194,370 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
133,851 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Cost of product sales |
|
|
30,579 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
26,780 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
62,150 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
47,051 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
64,519 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
42,442 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
132,220 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
86,800 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
21,065 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
23,862 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
42,906 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
44,343 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
11,812 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
10,327 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
31,803 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
21,100 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Amortization of purchased
intangible assets |
|
|
2,468 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2,359 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4,880 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5,082 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
35,345 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
36,548 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
79,589 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
70,525 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
29,174 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
5,894 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
52,631 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
16,275 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Other income and (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and other |
|
|
(3,275 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3,040 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(6,155 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(5,906 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Interest income and other |
|
|
1,293 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2,899 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,244 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Impairment of investment |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,046 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
27,146 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
4,167 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
47,329 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
12,613 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(9,609 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(1,281 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(16,428 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(3,558 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
|
17,537 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
2,886 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
30,901 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
9,055 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Net loss from discontinued
operations, net of tax |
|
|
(1,583 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1,054 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2,514 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1,596 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
15,954 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
$ |
1,832 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
28,387 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
$ |
7,459 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three and six months ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009
Continuing Operations
Product Sales
Product sales were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
95,098 |
|
|
$ |
69,222 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
$ |
194,370 |
|
|
$ |
133,851 |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the second quarter of 2010 as compared to the second quarter of 2009, product sales
increased by $25.9 million primarily due to higher worldwide sales of our HeartMate product line,
including Go-Gear peripherals introduced in the third quarter of 2009.
In the first half of 2010 as compared to the first half of 2009, product sales increased by
$60.5 million primarily due to higher worldwide sales of our HeartMate product line, including
Go-Gear peripherals, which was in part offset by a decline in the Thoratec product line. In the
U.S., ten HeartMate II centers have been added in first six months of 2010 bringing the total to
130 centers. Internationally, we added eleven centers in the first six months of 2010, bringing
the total to 102 centers.
Sales originating outside of the U.S. and U.S. export sales accounted for approximately 16%
and 19% of our total product sales in the second quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively, and
approximately 17% and 19% of our total product sales in the first half of 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
31
Gross Profit
Gross profit and gross margin were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages) |
|
Total gross profit |
|
$ |
64,519 |
|
|
$ |
42,442 |
|
|
$ |
132,220 |
|
|
$ |
86,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross margin |
|
|
68 |
% |
|
|
61 |
% |
|
|
68 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the second quarter of 2010 as compared to the second quarter of 2009, gross margin
percentage increased by 6.5 percentage points, primarily attributable to favorable manufacturing
variances driven by volume and the continued increase in sales of Go-Gear peripherals. In
addition, in the second quarter of 2009 we recorded a $4.3 million excess inventory reserve related
to the declining utilization of the HeartMate XVE that did not reoccur in the second quarter of
2010.
In the first half of 2010 as compared to the first half of 2009, gross margin percentage
increased by 3.2 percentage points, primarily attributable to favorable manufacturing variances
driven by volume and the continued increase in sales of Go-Gear peripherals. In addition, in the
first half of 2009 we recorded a $4.3 million excess inventory reserve related to the declining
utilization of the HeartMate XVE that did not reoccur in the first half of 2010.
Selling, General and Administrative
Selling, general and administrative expenses were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Total selling, general and administration |
|
$ |
21,065 |
|
|
$ |
23,862 |
|
|
|
(12 |
)% |
|
$ |
42,906 |
|
|
$ |
44,343 |
|
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the second quarter of 2010 as compared to the second quarter of 2009, selling, general and
administrative costs decreased by $2.8 million due to higher legal and consulting fees of $5.6
million related to the intended acquisition of HeartWare International Inc. (HeartWare) in 2009,
partially offset by $2.8 million related to the expansion of our sales force and other market
development initiatives.
In the first half of 2010 as compared to the first half of 2009, selling, general and
administrative costs decreased by $1.4 million due to higher legal and consulting fees of $7.9
million related to the intended acquisition of HeartWare in 2009, partially offset by the expansion
of our sales force and other market development initiatives, including users meetings.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Total research and development |
|
$ |
11,812 |
|
|
$ |
10,327 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
$ |
31,803 |
|
|
$ |
21,100 |
|
|
|
51 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development costs are largely project driven, and fluctuate based on the level of
project activity planned and subsequently approved and conducted.
In the second quarter of 2010 as compared to the second quarter of 2009, costs increased by
$1.5 million primarily due to an increase in personnel costs associated with new HeartMate II
system enhancements, cross platform initiatives and next generation
pump technology.
32
In the first half of 2010 as compared to the first half of 2009, costs increased by $10.7
million primarily due the acquisition of PHP technology of $8.5 million which was expensed, new
HeartMate II platform enhancements, development of HeartMate III and other new product technology.
Amortization of Purchased Intangible Assets
Amortization of purchased intangible assets in the second quarter of 2010 was $2.5 million as
compared to $2.4 million in the second quarter of 2009 and in the first half of 2010 was $4.9
million as compared to $5.1 million in the first half of 2009. The $0.2 million decrease in
amortization expense for the first half of 2010 was due to certain intangible assets being fully
amortized.
Interest Expense and Other
Interest
expense, primarily related to interest on the senior subordinated convertible notes,
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
3,067 |
|
|
$ |
2,939 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
$ |
5,844 |
|
|
$ |
5,702 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Amortization of debt issuance
costs related to senior
subordinated convertible
notes |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Loss on extinguishment of senior subordinated convertible notes |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
$ |
3,275 |
|
|
$ |
3,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,155 |
|
|
$ |
5,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, which is comprised primarily of the senior subordinated convertible notes,
is calculated using the interest rate method which increases interest expense over the term of the
debt resulting in a higher expense in the second quarter and first half of 2010 as compared to the
second quarter and first half of 2009. In addition, during the second quarter of 2010, 4,035 of
the 247,427 bonds originally issued in the senior subordinated convertible note financing had been
submitted to be converted and we had elected to pay cash in lieu of shares for these bonds,
resulting in a loss on extinguishment of such notes of $0.1 million.
Interest Income and Other
Interest income and other consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
1,206 |
|
|
$ |
1,419 |
|
|
|
(15 |
)% |
|
$ |
2,871 |
|
|
$ |
2,723 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Foreign currency, net |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
1,800 |
% |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
(513 |
) |
|
|
124 |
% |
Other |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
(374 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income and other |
|
$ |
1,293 |
|
|
$ |
1,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,899 |
|
|
$ |
2,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income in the second quarter of 2010 decreased by $0.2 million as compared to the
second quarter of 2009, primarily due to the decline in market interest rates.
Interest income in the first half of 2010 increased by $0.1 million from the first half of
2009, mainly due to increased cash and investment balances partially offset by the decline in
market interest rates and shortened maturities on our investment portfolio. Foreign currency loss
decreased in the same period by $0.6 million due to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates.
Impairment on Investment
During
the first half of 2010, we recorded an impairment charge of $2.0 million for our
entire investment in Acorn Cardiovascular, Inc., a start-up medical device company.
33
Income Taxes
Our effective income tax rates for the three months ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009 were 35.4% and 30.7%,
respectively. The increase in our tax rate of 4.7 percentage points was primarily due to an increase in pre-tax
earnings, and the proportion of tax exempt interest to higher pre-tax earnings.
Our effective income tax rates for the six months ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009 were 34.7% and 28.2%,
respectively. The increase in our tax rate of 6.5 percentage points was primarily due to an increase in pre-tax
earnings, and the proportion of tax exempt interest to the higher pre-tax earnings. In addition, in the first quarter
of 2009 a discrete benefit was recorded for a change in California law.
Further, both of the three month and six month periods in 2010 were affected by federal research tax credits
which were available in 2009 but are not currently available in 2010 as a result of the expiration of federal research tax credit legislation.
Our effective tax rate is calculated based on the statutory tax rates imposed on projected annual pre-tax
income or loss in various jurisdictions. Since changes in our forecasted profitability for 2010 can significantly affect
our projected annual effective tax rate, we believe our quarterly tax rate will be dependent on our profitability and
could fluctuate significantly.
Analysis of Discontinued Operations
On April 25, 2010, we entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement to sell the ITC division to
Danaher Corporation for $110.0 million in cash upon closing, subject to certain purchase price
adjustments as set forth in the agreement. As such, the ITC division
is classified as held for
sale on the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of July 3,
2010 and January 2, 2010 and its
results of operations displayed in discontinued operations for all periods presented.
On July 26, 2010, the sale was terminated as a result of the failure of the Company
and Danaher to agree on the status of certain aspects of ITCs quality system and regulatory
filings. We expect to locate another buyer and complete the sale of ITC within the next twelve
months.
Discontinued operations incurred a loss of $1.6 million in the second quarter of 2010 compared
to a loss of $1.1 million in the second quarter of 2009. The increase in the loss from
discontinued operations was primarily due to lower gross profits as a
result of higher unfavorable
manufacturing variances.
Discontinued operations incurred a loss of $2.5 million during the first half of 2010 compared
to a loss of $1.6 million in the first half of 2009. The increase in the loss from discontinued
operations was primarily due to lower gross profit as a result of
higher unfavorable manufacturing variances.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments
Cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid financial instruments that are readily
convertible to cash and have maturities of 90 days or less from the date of purchase.
Investments classified as short-term consist of various financial instruments such as
commercial paper, U.S. government agency obligations, variable demand notes and corporate notes.
Bonds with high credit quality with maturities of greater than 90 days when purchased are
classified as available-for-sale. Investments classified as long-term consist of our investments in
auction rate securities.
34
Following is a summary of our cash, cash equivalents and investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
January 2, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
37,435 |
|
|
$ |
27,787 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
314,724 |
|
|
|
279,174 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
24,166 |
|
|
|
24,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash, cash equivalents and investments |
|
$ |
376,325 |
|
|
$ |
331,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe that cash and cash equivalents, short-term available-for-sale investments on hand
and expected cash flows from operations will be sufficient to fund our operations and capital
requirements for at least the next twelve months.
As of July 3, 2010, we owned approximately $27.7 million face amount of auction rate
securities classified as long-term. The assets underlying these investments are student loans
backed by the U.S. government under the Federal Family Education Loan Program or by private
insurers and are rated between A- and AAA. Historically, these securities have provided liquidity
through a Dutch auction process that resets the applicable interest rate periodically every seven
to thirty-five days. Beginning in February of 2008, these auctions began to fail. The principal
amount of these auction rate securities will not be accessible until future auctions for these
securities are successful, a secondary market is established, these securities are called for
redemption, or they are paid at maturity.
We recorded an estimated cumulative unrealized loss of $3.5 million ($2.1 million, net of tax)
related to the temporary impairment of the auction rate securities, which was included in
accumulated other comprehensive loss within shareholders equity. In addition, our management
reviews impairments and credit losses associated with its investments, including auction rate
securities, to determine the classification of the impairment as temporary or
other-than-temporary and to bifurcate the credit and non-credit component of other-than-temporary
impairment event. We do not intend to sell any of the auction rate securities prior to maturity at
an amount below the original purchase value; we intend to hold the investment to recovery and based
on a more-likely-than-not probability assessment we will not be required to sell the security
before recovery; and we deem that it is not probable that we will receive less than 100% of the
principal and accrued interest from the issuer. Therefore, 100% of the impairment was charged to
other comprehensive loss. Further, we continue to liquidate investments in auction rate securities
as opportunities arise. Subsequent to the second quarter of 2010 we liquidated $3.0 million of our
auction rate securities at par value through a successful auction.
We continue to monitor the market for auction rate securities and consider its impact (if any)
on the fair value of our investments. If the current market conditions deteriorate further, or the
anticipated recovery in fair values does not occur, we may be required to record additional
unrealized losses in other comprehensive loss or other-than-temporary impairment charges to the
condensed consolidated statements of operations in future periods.
We intend and have the ability to hold these auction rate securities until the market
recovers, and the securities recover to par or until maturity. We do not anticipate having to sell
these securities in order to operate our business. We believe that, based on our current cash, cash
equivalents and short-term marketable security investment balances of $352.2 million as of July 3,
2010, the current lack of liquidity in the credit and capital markets will not have an impact on
our liquidity, our cash flow or our ability to fund our operations. If the issuers of the auction
rate securities are unable to successfully complete future auctions and their credit ratings
deteriorate, we may in the future be required to record other-than-temporary impairment charge on
these investments. It could conceivably take until the final maturity of the underlying notes (up
to 30 years) to realize our investments recorded value.
35
Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes
In 2004, we completed the sale of $143.8 million initial principal amount of senior subordinated convertible
notes due in 2034. The senior subordinated convertible notes were issued at an issue price of $580.98 per note,
which is 58.098% of the principal amount at maturity of the notes. The senior subordinated convertible notes
bear interest at a rate of 1.3798% per year on the principal amount at maturity, payable semi-annually in arrears
in cash on May 16 and November 16 of each year, from November 16, 2004 until May 16, 2011. Holders of the
senior subordinated convertible notes may convert their convertible notes into shares of our common stock at a
conversion rate of 29.4652 shares per $1,000 principal amount of senior subordinated convertible notes, which
represents a conversion price of $19.72 per share, subject to adjustments upon the occurrence of certain events as
set forth in the indenture. Holders have been and are able to convert their convertible notes at any point after the
close of business on September 30, 2004 if, as of the last day of the preceding calendar quarter, the closing price
of our common stock for at least 20 trading days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last
trading day of such preceding calendar quarter is more than 120% of the accreted conversion price per share of
our common stock. Commencing October 1, 2008, this market price conversion feature was satisfied, such that
holders of the senior subordinated convertible notes may convert their notes through the final maturity date of
the notes into shares of our common stock at a conversion rate of 29.462 shares per $1,000 principal amount of
senior subordinated convertible notes, subject to adjustments as provided in the indenture. If holders elect
conversion, we may, at our option, deliver shares of common stock, pay a holder in cash, or deliver a
combination of shares and cash, as determined pursuant to the terms of the notes. As of July 3, 2010, 4,035 of
the 247,427 bonds originally issued had been submitted to be converted and we had elected to pay cash in lieu of
shares for these bonds.
In addition, holders may require us to repurchase all or a portion of their senior
subordinated convertible notes on each of May 16, 2011, 2014, 2019, 2024 and 2029 at a repurchase price equal to 100%
of the issue price, plus the accrued original issue discount, if any. Due to this redemption feature, where holders
may require us to repurchase all or a portion of the senior subordinated convertible notes as early as May 16, 2011, these senior
subordinated convertible notes have been reclassified from long-term liabilities to current liabilities during the second quarter of 2010.
We adopted ASC 470-20, Debt, applied retrospectively,
which increases non-cash interest expense based on the market rate of 9% percent per annum as
compared to the cash coupon rate of 2.375% as further discussed in Note 10, Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes.
Cash Flow Activities from Continuing Operations
Following is a summary of our cash flow activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities |
|
$ |
28,842 |
|
|
$ |
15,126 |
|
Net cash used in continuing investing activities |
|
|
(42,170 |
) |
|
|
(44,076 |
) |
Net cash provided by continuing financing activities |
|
|
23,078 |
|
|
|
3,047 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
9,648 |
|
|
$ |
(25,994 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Provided by Continuing Operating Activities
For
the six months ended July 3, 2010, cash provided by operating
activities was $28.8
million. This amount included net income from continuing operations of $30.9 million increased by
non-cash adjustments to net income of $21.5 million primarily comprised of $3.3 million related to
depreciation, $4.9 million related to amortization, $10.0 million related to tax benefit related to
stock options, $6.7 million related to share-based compensation expense, and non-cash interest on
senior subordinated convertible notes of $4.1 million. These were
partially offset by a decrease of $9.3
million related to excess tax benefits from share-based compensation and $3.4 million change in our
net deferred tax liability. Changes in assets and liabilities used cash of $23.5 million primarily
due to increases in tax payments, inventories, and receivables, partially offset by an increase in
accounts payable and other liabilities.
Cash Used in Continuing Investing Activities
For the six months ended July 3, 2010, cash used in investing activities was $42.2 million,
due to purchases of investments of $300.6 million, partially offset by sales and maturities of
investments of $262.0 million. In addition, we made $2.1 million of purchases of property, plant
and equipment which included $1.8 million for lab equipment related to the expansion of our
research and development facilities and an increase in furniture and computers for expansion of our
Pleasanton office.
36
Cash Provided by Continuing Financing Activities
For
the six months ended July 3, 2010, cash provided by financing
activities was $23.1
million, primarily was comprised of $21.8 million from proceeds related to stock option exercises,
$1.9 million from proceeds from stock issued under our employee
stock purchase plan and $9.3
million from excess tax benefits from stock option exercises, offset by $4.5 million of restricted
stock purchased for payment of income tax withholding due upon vesting and $5.3 million used to
extinguish notes because 4,035 of our senior subordinated convertible notes were submitted for
conversion.
Cash Flow Activities from Discontinued Operations
Following is a summary of the cash flow activities from discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
2,495 |
|
|
$ |
1,950 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(1,746 |
) |
|
|
(1,535 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in bank overdraft |
|
$ |
749 |
|
|
$ |
415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We maintain an Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit as part of our workers compensation
insurance program. The Letter of Credit is not collateralized. The Letter of Credit automatically
renews on June 30th of each year, unless terminated by one of the parties. As of July 3, 2010, our
Letter of Credit was approximately $1.0 million.
Contractual Obligations
As of July 3, 2010, the liability for uncertain tax positions was $10.3 million, including
interest and penalties. Due to the high degree of uncertainty regarding the timing of potential
future cash flows associated with these liabilities, we are unable to make a reasonably reliable
estimate of the amount and period in which these liabilities might be paid.
During the three and six months ended July 3, 2010 there were no other material changes to our
contractual obligations reported in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K, outside our normal course
of business.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk
Our investment portfolio is made up of marketable investments in money market funds, auction
rate securities, U.S. Treasury securities and debt instruments of government agencies, local
municipalities, and high quality corporate issuers. All investments are carried at fair market
value and are treated as available-for-sale. Investments with maturities beyond one year may be
classified as short-term based on their highly liquid nature due to the frequency with which the
interest rate is reset and because such marketable securities represent the investment of cash that
is available for current operations. Our auction rate securities that are not liquid are classified
as long-term. Our holdings of the securities of any one issuer, except government agencies, do not
exceed 10% of the portfolio. If interest rates rise, the market value of our investments may
decline, which could result in a loss if we were forced to sell an investment before its scheduled
maturity. If interest rates were to rise or fall from current levels by 25 basis points and by 50
basis points, the change in our net unrealized gain or loss on investments would be $0.6 million
and $1.1 million, respectively. We do not utilize derivative financial instruments to manage
interest rate risks. Our senior subordinated convertible notes and the Levitronix convertible
debenture do not bear interest rate risk as the notes and debenture were issued at a fixed rate of
interest.
37
Foreign Currency Rate Fluctuations
We use forward foreign currency contracts to mitigate the gains and losses generated by the
re-measurement of non-functional currency assets and liabilities (primarily assets and liabilities
on our U.K. subsidiarys consolidated balance sheet). Our contracts typically have maturities of
three months or less.
Effective January 3, 2010, we changed our functional currency for our U.K subsidiary from U.K
pounds to euros. This change did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated
financial statements however the change did impact our foreign currency hedging contracts. As of
July 3, 2010, we owned forward contracts to sell euros to U.S. dollars with a notional value of
7.1 million, to sell U.S. dollars to euro with a notional value of $2.3 million and to sell U.K.
pounds to euros with a notional value of £1.0 million as compared to July 4, 2009, when we owned
forward contracts to sell euros to U.S dollars with a notional value of 8.5 million and purchase
U.K. pounds from U.S. dollars with a notional value of £5.1 million. As of July 3, 2010, our
forward contracts had an average exchange rate of one U.S. dollar to 1.2546 euros and one U.K.
pound to 1.2094 euros. The potential fair value loss for a hypothetical 10% adverse change in
foreign currency exchange rates as of July 3, 2010 would be approximately $0.8 million.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Attached as exhibits to this Form 10-Q are certifications of our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, which are required in accordance with Rule 13a-14 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). This Controls and Procedures section
includes information concerning the controls and controls evaluation referred to in the
certifications.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness
of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e)
under the Exchange Act, as of July 3, 2010. The evaluation of our disclosure controls and
procedures included a review of our processes and the effect on the information generated for use
in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In the course of this evaluation, we sought to identify any
significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in our disclosure controls and procedures, to
determine whether we had identified any acts of fraud involving personnel who have a significant
role in our disclosure controls and procedures, and to confirm that any necessary corrective
action, including process improvements, was taken. This type of evaluation is done quarterly so
that our conclusions concerning the effectiveness of these controls can be reported in our periodic
reports filed with the SEC. The overall goals of these evaluation activities are to monitor our
disclosure controls and procedures and to make modifications as necessary. We intend to maintain
these disclosure controls and procedures, modifying them as circumstances warrant.
Based on that evaluation, our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, concluded that as of July 3, 2010 the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act, were effective to provide
reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or
submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and to provide reasonable assurance that such
information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive
officer, as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Changes to Internal Controls
There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the
quarter ended July 3, 2010 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially
affect our internal control over financial reporting.
38
Inherent Limitations on Controls and Procedures
Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, does
not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal controls will prevent all
error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can only provide
reasonable assurances that the objectives of the control system are met. The design of a control
system reflects resource constraints; the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their
costs. Because there are inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can
provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the
Company have been or will be detected. As these inherent limitations are known features of the
financial reporting process, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though
not eliminate, these risks. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in
decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns occur because of simple error or mistake.
Controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more
people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls is based in
part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. While our disclosure controls
and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives, there
can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all future
conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or
deterioration in the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures. Because of the inherent
limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and
not be detected.
We intend to review and evaluate the design and effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures on an ongoing basis and to improve our controls and procedures over time and to correct
any deficiencies that we may discover in the future. While our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer have concluded that, as of July 3, 2010, the design of our disclosure controls
and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act, was effective, future events
affecting our business may cause us to significantly modify our disclosure controls and procedures.
39
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report, you should carefully
consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our 2009 Annual Report on Form
10-K, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks
described in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks
and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may
materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
ITEM 2: UNREGISTERED SALE OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
There were no unregistered sales of our equity securities during the three months ended July
3, 2010.
The following table sets forth certain information about our common stock repurchased during
the three months ended July 3, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number |
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of shares |
|
|
value of shares |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
purchased |
|
|
authorized to be |
|
|
|
number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
under |
|
|
purchased under |
|
|
|
of shares |
|
|
Average |
|
|
publicly |
|
|
publicly |
|
|
|
purchased |
|
|
price paid |
|
|
announced |
|
|
announced |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
|
per share |
|
|
programs (1) |
|
|
programs |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
April 4, 2010 through May 1, 2010 |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
35.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
May 2, 2010 through May 29, 2010 |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
41.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 30, 2010 through July 3, 2010 |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
43.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
$ |
40.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our share repurchase programs, which authorized us to repurchase up to a total of $130
million of our common shares, were announced on February 11, 2004 as a $25 million program, on
May 12, 2004 as a $60 million program, on July 29, 2004 as a $25 million program and on
February 2, 2006 as a $20 million program. These programs authorize us to acquire shares in
the open market or in privately negotiated transactions and do not have an expiration date. No
shares were repurchased under these programs during the three months ended July 3, 2010. As of
July 3, 2010, we have $10.1 million remaining under our share repurchase programs. |
|
(2) |
|
Shares purchased that were not part of our publicly announced repurchase programs represent
the surrender value of shares of restricted stock used to pay income taxes due upon vesting,
and do not reduce the dollar value that may yet be purchased under our publicly announced
repurchase programs. |
40
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
2.1 |
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2010, by and between Thoratec Corporation and Radiometer America Inc. (1)
|
|
10.1 |
|
Thoratec Corporation Amended and Restated 2006 Incentive Stock Plan (2) |
31.1 |
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer. |
|
31.2 |
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer. |
|
32.1 |
|
Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer. |
|
32.2 |
|
Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer. |
|
101*** |
|
The following materials from Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 3,
2010, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) includes: (i) Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009, (iii) Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009, and
(iv) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text.
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Filed as an Exhibit to Thoratecs Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
April 26, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(2) |
|
Filed as an Exhibit to Thoratecs Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May
25, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference. |
41
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Security Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
THORATEC CORPORATION
|
|
Date: August 10, 2010 |
/s/ Gerhard F. Burbach
|
|
|
Gerhard F. Burbach |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
Date: August 10, 2010 |
/s/ David V. Smith
|
|
|
David V. Smith |
|
|
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
42