e10vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark one)
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2010, Commission File Number 1-9235
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-9235
THOR INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
93-0768752 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
|
|
|
419 W. Pike Street, Jackson Center, Ohio
|
|
45334-0629 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (937) 596-6849
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class:
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered: |
Common Stock (par value $.10 per share)
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been
subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions, of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated Filer þ
|
|
Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 126-2 of the
Exchange Act.)
Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the
registrant as of January 29, 2010 was $1,069,877,718 based on the closing price of the registrants
common shares on January 29, 2010, the last business day of the registrants most recently
completed second fiscal quarter. Solely for the purpose of this calculation and for no other
purpose, the non-affiliates of the registrant are assumed to be all shareholders of the registrant
other than (i) directors of the registrant (ii) current executive officers of the registrant who
are identified as named executive officers pursuant to Item 11 of the registrants Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended July 31, 2009 and (iii) any shareholder that beneficially owns 10% or more of
the registrants common stock. Such exclusion is not intended, nor shall it be deemed, to be an
admission that such persons are affiliates of the registrant. The number of common shares of
registrants stock outstanding as of September 15, 2010 was 51,461,510.
Documents incorporated by reference:
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on December 7,
2010 are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
PART I
Unless otherwise indicated, all amounts presented in thousands except units, square feet, share and
per share data.
General Development of Business
Our company was founded in 1980 and manufactures and sells a wide range of recreation vehicles and
small and mid-size buses in the United States and Canada. We are incorporated in Delaware and are
the successor to a corporation of the same name which was incorporated in Nevada on July 29, 1980.
Our principal executive office is located at 419 West Pike Street, Jackson Center, Ohio 45334 and
our telephone number is (937) 596-6849. Our Internet address is www.thorindustries.com. We maintain
copies of our recent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), available free of
charge, on our web site. Unless the context otherwise requires or indicates, all references to
Thor, the Company, we, our, and us refer to Thor Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Our principal recreation vehicle operating subsidiaries were Airstream, Inc. (Airstream),
CrossRoads RV (CrossRoads), Dutchmen Manufacturing, Inc. (Dutchmen), Four Winds International, Inc.
(Four Winds), Keystone RV Company (Keystone), Komfort Corp. (Komfort), Citair, Inc. (Citair), and
Damon Corporation (Damon). Our principal bus operating subsidiaries were Champion Bus, Inc.
(Champion), General Coach America, Inc., (General Coach), ElDorado National California, Inc.
(ElDorado California), ElDorado National Kansas, Inc. (ElDorado Kansas), Goshen Coach, Inc. (Goshen
Coach) and SJC Industries, Corp. (SJC).
On March 1, 2010, we acquired 100% of SJC Industries Corp. (SJC), a privately-held
manufacturer of ambulances based in Elkhart, Indiana, for $19,756 in cash and $325 in future cash
obligations for a total purchase price of $20,081. We believe that SJC is currently the second
largest manufacturer of ambulances in the United States. We believe that the ambulance business is
a natural fit with our bus business and have included the operations of SJC in our Buses reportable
segment.
On April 30, 2010, we sold our Citair travel trailer and park model business to a former member of
Citairs management. Citair did business in Canada under the names General Coach, Hensall and
General Coach, Oliver. We recorded a $323 pre-tax loss on the sale.
Effective September 8, 2010, the operations of Damon and Four Winds were combined to form Thor
Motor Coach. The combination of these operations is intended to help our dealers (and retail customers) by
building strong brands supported by a strong name. This new structure will allow the motorized group
to leverage the Thor name, which is known for strength and stability, and to focus on its value
oriented individual brands.
On September 16, 2010, we acquired 100% of Towables Holdings, Inc., the parent company of Heartland
Recreation Vehicles, LLC (Heartland) pursuant to a stock
purchase agreement for $99,562 in cash, subject to adjustment,
and 4,300,000 shares of our common stock. Heartland is located in Elkhart,
Indiana and is a major manufacturer of towable recreation vehicles. Under our ownership, Heartland
will continue as an independent operation, in the same manner as our existing recreation vehicle
and bus companies, and its operations will be included in our Towables reportable segment.
The acquisition of Heartland is expected to be accretive to our earnings, based upon Heartlands recent and
historical performances. From its founding in 2003, Heartland has become the third largest
manufacturer of fifth wheels and the sixth largest manufacturer of travel trailers in the United
States based upon Statistical Surveys retail market data as of June, 2010. Heartland has been the
fastest growing RV manufacturer in recent years, and its sales over the last 12 months exceeded
$400,000. Its brands include Bighorn, Sundance, Cyclone, North Country, and North Trail, sold
through a nationwide network of dealers.
Recreation Vehicles
We believe that we are the largest unit and revenue manufacturer of recreation vehicles in North
America based on retail statistics published by Statistical Surveys, Inc. and publicly reported
results.
Airstream
Our Airstream subsidiary manufactures and sells premium and medium-high priced travel trailers and
motorhomes under the trade name Airstream. Airstream vehicles are distinguished by their rounded
shape and bright aluminum finish and, in our opinion, constitute the most recognized product in the
recreation vehicle industry. Airstream, responding to the demands of the market for a lighter,
lower-cost product, also manufactures and sells the Airstream International, Classic, Flying Cloud
and Bambi travel trailers. Airstream also sells the Interstate and Avenue Class B motorhomes.
1
Dutchmen
Our Dutchmen subsidiary manufactures and sells conventional travel trailers and fifth wheels
primarily under the trade names Dutchmen, Aero, Kodiak, Grand Junction, Denali and Voltage.
Four Winds
Our Four Winds subsidiary manufactures and sells gasoline and diesel Class A, Class C and Class B
motorhomes. Its products are sold under trade names such as Four Winds, Hurricane, Windsport,
Chateau and Serrano.
Damon
Our Damon subsidiary manufactures and sells gasoline and diesel Class A motorhomes under the trade
names Daybreak, Challenger, Astoria, Avanti, Tuscany and Outlaw.
CrossRoads
Our CrossRoads subsidiary manufactures and sells conventional travel trailers and fifth wheels
under the trade names Cruiser, Seville, Zinger and Sunset Trail and park models under the trade
names Tranquility and Westchester. Park models are factory built second homes designed for
recreational living. They are towed to a destination site such as a lake, woods or park and are
considered a country cottage.
Citair
Our Citair subsidiary manufactured travel trailers, fifth wheels, truck campers and park models
until its sale on April 30, 2010. It operated under the name General Coach and sold
recreation vehicles and park models under various trade names.
Keystone
Our Keystone subsidiary manufactures and sells travel trailers and fifth wheels under trade names
such as Montana, Springdale, Hornet, Sprinter, Outback, Laredo, Alpine, Mountaineer, Avalanche,
Raptor, Passport and Cougar.
Komfort
Our Komfort subsidiary manufactures and sells travel trailers and fifth wheels under the trade
names Komfort and Trailblazer primarily in the western United States and western Canada.
Breckenridge
Breckenridge is the park model division of Damon Corporation.
Buses
We believe that our bus segment is the largest manufacturer of small and mid-size transit and
commercial buses in North America (those up to 35 feet) based on statistics published by the
Mid-Size Bus Manufacturers Association. We also build 40-foot buses for transit and airport shuttle
use.
ElDorado National
ElDorado National, comprised of our ElDorado Kansas and ElDorado California subsidiaries,
manufactures and sells buses and mobility vans for transit, airport car rental and hotel/motel
shuttles, paramedical transit for hospitals and nursing homes, tour and charter operations and
other uses.
ElDorado National manufactures and sells buses under trade names such as Aerolite, AeroElite,
Aerotech, Escort, MST, Transmark, EZ Rider, and Axess, its 40 foot bus.
Champion Bus
Champion manufactures and sells small and mid-size buses under trade names such as Challenger,
Defender, CTS-RE and Crusader.
2
General Coach
General Coach manufactures and sells small and mid-size buses under trade names such as American
Crusader, American Coach, and EZ Trans.
Goshen Coach
Goshen Coach manufactures and sells small and mid-size buses under trade names such as GC II and
Pacer.
SJC
SJC manufactures and sells ambulances under trade names such as McCoy Miller, Marque and Premiere.
Product Line Sales and Segment Information
The Company has three reportable segments: 1.) towable recreation vehicles, 2.) motorized
recreation vehicles, and 3.) buses. The towable recreation vehicles segment consists of product
lines from the following operating companies that have been aggregated: Airstream, Breckenridge,
CrossRoads, Dutchmen, General Coach, Hensall and General Coach, Oliver, Keystone, and Komfort. The
motorized recreation vehicles segment consists of product lines from the following operating
companies that have been aggregated: Airstream, Damon, and Four Winds. The buses segment consists
of the following operating companies that have been aggregated: Champion Bus, General Coach,
ElDorado California, ElDorado Kansas, Goshen Coach, and SJC. The operations of SJC are aggregated in the buses reportable segment because SJC has similar economic characteristics to our bus
businesses and the nature of its products, production processes, types of customers, distribution channels and regulatory environment are also similar to those within our bus businesses.
The table below sets forth the contribution of each of the Companys segments to net sales in each
of the last three fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
Recreation Vehicles: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towables |
|
$ |
1,556,591 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
$ |
953,279 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
$ |
1,763,099 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Motorized |
|
|
291,958 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
161,727 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
461,856 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Recreation Vehicles |
|
|
1,848,549 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
1,115,006 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
2,224,955 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
Buses |
|
|
428,008 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
406,890 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
415,725 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Sales |
|
$ |
2,276,557 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
$ |
1,521,896 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
$ |
2,640,680 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recreation Vehicles
Overview
We manufacture and sell a wide variety of recreation vehicles throughout the United States and
Canada, as well as related parts and accessories. Recreation vehicle classifications are based upon
standards established by the Recreation Vehicle Industry Association (RVIA) and park model
classifications are based upon standards established by the Recreation Park Trailer Industry
Association (RPTIA). The principal types of recreation vehicles that we produce include
conventional travel trailers, fifth wheels, Class A, Class C, and Class B motorhomes and park
models.
Travel trailers are non-motorized vehicles which are designed to be towed by passenger automobiles,
pickup trucks, SUVs or vans. Travel trailers provide comfortable, self-contained living facilities
for short periods of time. We produce conventional and fifth wheel travel trailers.
Conventional trailers are towed by means of a frame hitch attached to the towing vehicle. Fifth
wheel trailers, designed to be towed by pickup trucks, are constructed with a raised forward
section that is attached to a receiver in the bed area of the pickup truck.
Park models are recreational dwellings towed to a permanent site such as a lake, woods or park. The
maximum size of park models in the United States is 400 square feet. They provide comfortable self
contained living and are second homes for their owners, according to RPTIA.
A motorhome is a self-powered vehicle built on a motor vehicle chassis. Motorhomes are
self-contained with their own lighting, heating, cooking, refrigeration, sewage holding and water
storage facilities, so that they can be lived in without being attached to utilities.
Class A motorhomes, constructed on medium-duty truck chassis, are supplied complete with engine and
drive train components by motor vehicle manufacturers such as Workhorse Custom Chassis, Ford and
Freightliner. We design, manufacture and install the living area and drivers compartment of Class
A motorhomes. Class C and Class B motorhomes are built on a Ford, General Motors or Mercedes Benz
small truck or van chassis which includes an engine, drive train components, and a finished cab
section. We construct a living area which has
3
access to the drivers compartment and attaches to the cab section. Although they are not designed
for permanent or semi-permanent living, motorhomes can provide comfortable living facilities for
short periods of time.
Production
In order to minimize finished inventory, our recreation vehicles generally are produced to dealer
order. Our facilities are designed to provide efficient assembly line manufacturing of products.
Capacity increases can be achieved at relatively low cost, largely by increasing the number of
production employees or by acquiring or leasing additional facilities and equipment.
We purchase in finished form many of the components used in the production of our recreation
vehicles. The principal raw materials used in the manufacturing processes for motorhomes and travel
trailers are aluminum, lumber, plywood, plastic, fiberglass, and steel purchased from numerous
suppliers. We believe that, except for chassis, substitute sources for raw materials and components
are available with no material impact on our operations.
Our relationship with our chassis suppliers is similar to our other vendor relationships in that no
long term contractual commitments are engaged in by either party. Historically, Ford and General
Motors resort to an industry-wide allocation system during periods when supply is restricted. These
allocations would be based on the volume of chassis previously purchased. Sales of motorhomes and
small buses rely on these chassis and are affected accordingly.
We do not expect the current condition of the U.S. auto industry, including the bankruptcy
reorganizations of General Motors and Chrysler, to have a significant impact on our supply of
motorhome chassis. Supply of motorhome chassis is adequate for now and we believe that available
inventory would compensate for changes in supply schedules if they occur. To date, we have not
noticed any unusual cost increases from our motorhome chassis suppliers. If the condition of the
U.S. auto industry significantly worsens, this could result in supply interruptions and a decrease
in our sales and earnings while we obtain replacement chassis from other sources.
Generally, all of our operating subsidiaries introduce new or improved lines or models of
recreation vehicles each year. Changes typically include new sizes and floor plans, different
decors or design features, and engineering improvements.
Seasonality
Since recreation vehicles are used primarily by vacationers and campers, our recreation vehicle
sales are seasonal and, in most geographical areas, tend to be significantly lower during the
winter months than in other periods. As a result, recreation vehicle sales are historically lowest
during the second fiscal quarter, which ends on January 31 of each year.
Marketing and Distribution
We market our recreation vehicles through independent dealers located throughout the United States
and Canada. Each of our recreation vehicle operating subsidiaries maintains its own dealer
organization, with some dealers carrying more than one of our product lines. As of July 31, 2010,
there were approximately 1,370 dealers carrying our products in the U.S. and Canada. We believe
that close working relationships between our management and sales personnel and the many
independent dealers we work with provide us with valuable information on customer preferences and
the quality and marketability of our products. Additionally, by maintaining substantially separate
dealer networks for each of our subsidiaries, our products are more likely to be competing against
competitors products in similar price ranges rather than against our other products. Park models
are typically sold by park model dealers as well as by some travel trailer dealers.
Each of our recreation vehicle operating subsidiaries has an independent sales force to call on
their dealers. Our most important sales promotions occur at the major recreation vehicle shows
which take place throughout the year at different locations across the country. We benefit from the
recreation vehicle awareness advertising and major marketing programs sponsored by the RVIA in
national print media and television. We engage in a limited amount of consumer-oriented advertising
for our recreation vehicles, primarily through industry magazines, product brochures, direct mail
advertising campaigns and the internet.
In our selection of individual dealers, we emphasize the dealers ability to maintain a sufficient
inventory of our products, as well as their reputation, experience, and ability to provide service.
Many of our dealers carry the recreation vehicle lines of one or more of our competitors.
Generally, each of our operating subsidiaries has sales agreements with their dealers and these
agreements are subject to annual review.
During fiscal 2010 and 2009, one of our dealers, FreedomRoads, LLC, accounted for 18% and 15% of
our consolidated recreation vehicle net sales and 15% and 11% of our consolidated net sales,
respectively. In January 2009, we entered into two credit agreements with Stephen Adams, in his
individual capacity, and Stephen Adams and his successors, as trustee under the Stephen Adams
Living Trust (the Trust and, together with each of the foregoing persons, the Borrowers),
pursuant to which we made two $10,000 loans to the Borrowers. The first
4
loan matures on January 15, 2014 and the second loan matures on June 30, 2012. In addition, in
December 2009, we entered into a credit agreement with Marcus Lemonis, Stephen Adams, in his
individual capacity, and Stephen Adams and his successors, as trustee under the Trust
(collectively, the Third Loan Borrowers), pursuant to which we made a $10,000 loan to the Third
Loan Borrowers that matures on December 22, 2014. The Borrowers and the Third Loan Borrowers own,
directly or indirectly, a controlling interest in FreedomRoads Holding Company, LLC, the parent
company of FreedomRoads, LLC.
Substantially all of our sales to dealers are made on terms requiring cash on delivery or within 15
days of the invoice date. We generally do not finance dealer purchases. Most dealers are financed
on a floor plan basis by an unrelated bank or financing company which lends the dealer all or
substantially all of the wholesale purchase price and retains a security interest in the vehicles
purchased. As is customary in the recreation vehicle industry, we will execute a repurchase
agreement with a lending institution financing a dealers purchase of our products upon the lending
institutions request. Repurchase agreements provide that, for up to 18 months after a unit is
financed, and in the event of default by the dealer and notification from the lending institution
of the dealer default, we will repurchase all the dealer units repossessed by the lending
institution for the amount then due, which is often less than 100% of the dealers cost. The risk
of loss under repurchase agreements is spread over numerous dealers and is further reduced by the
resale value of the units which we would be required to repurchase. We believe that any future
losses under these agreements would not have a material adverse effect on our Company.
The losses incurred due to repurchase were approximately $1,336, $5,261, and $1,857 in fiscal 2010,
2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in losses results from the significant recovery in fiscal
2010 from the more difficult market for the recreation vehicle business in fiscal 2009. We
decreased our reserve for repurchase and guarantees at July 31, 2010 to $3,312 from $6,349 at July
31, 2009 to account for a reduction in anticipated future losses.
Joint Ventures
In March 1996, our Company and Cruise America, Inc. formed a 50/50 owned joint venture, CAT Joint
Venture LLC (CAT), to make short-term rentals of motorized recreation vehicles to the public. As
of July 31, 2010, we were contingently liable for repurchase obligations of CAT inventory in the
amount of $7,254. Losses on the repurchase of units are shared equally with our joint venture
partner. Our total investment in this joint venture at July 31, 2010 is $2,474.
In March 1994, the Company and a financial services company formed a joint venture, Thor Credit
Corporation (TCC), to finance the sale of recreation vehicles to consumer buyers. This joint
venture was dissolved in September 2008 after the joint venture partner informed us that it was no
longer providing retail financing for recreation vehicles. We recovered our investment of $1,578
upon dissolution.
Backlog
As of July 31, 2010, the backlog for towable and motorized recreation vehicle orders was $195,788
and $65,528, respectively, compared to $262,072 and $36,256, respectively, at July 31, 2009.
Backlog represents unfilled dealer orders on a particular day which can and do fluctuate on a
seasonal basis. In the recreation vehicle business our manufacturing time is relatively short. The
existing backlog of towable and motorized recreation vehicles is expected to be filled in fiscal
2011.
Historically, the amount of our current backlog compared to our backlog in previous periods
reflects general economic and industry conditions and, together with other relevant factors such as
continued acceptance of our products by the consumer, may be an indicator of our revenues in the
near term.
Product Warranties
We generally provide retail purchasers of our recreation vehicles with a one-year limited warranty
against defects in materials and workmanship and a standard two year limited warranty on certain
major components separately warranted by the suppliers of these components. The chassis and engines
of our motorhomes are warranted for three years or 36,000 miles by their manufacturers.
Buses
Overview
Our buses
are sold under the names ElDorado National, Champion Bus, General Coach and Goshen Coach and ambulances under the name SJC.
Our small and mid-size products consist of mass transit, airport shuttle and commercial and tourist
use buses. Our larger Axess 40 foot bus is designed for
transit and airport shuttle uses. Our SJC ambulances are used by public and private rescue squads.
5
Production
Our bus production facilities in Salina, Kansas; Riverside, California; Imlay City, Michigan; and
Elkhart, Indiana are designed to provide efficient assembly line manufacturing of our buses. The
vehicles are produced according to specific orders which are normally obtained by dealers.
Some of the chassis, all of the engines and auxiliary units, and some of the seating and other
components used in the production of our small and mid-size buses are purchased in finished form.
Our Riverside, California facility assembles chassis for our rear engine buses from industry
standard components and assembles these buses directly on the chassis.
The principal raw materials used in the manufacturing of our buses are fiberglass, steel, aluminum,
plywood, and plastic. We purchase most of the raw materials and components from numerous suppliers.
We purchase most of our bus chassis from Ford, Navistar, Mercedes Benz and General Motors and
engines from Cummins and Caterpillar. We believe that, except for chassis, raw materials and
components could be purchased from other sources, if necessary, with no material impact on our
operations.
We do not expect the current condition of the U.S. auto industry, including the bankruptcy
reorganizations of General Motors and Chrysler, to have a significant impact on our supply of bus
chassis. Supply of bus chassis is adequate for now and we believe that available inventory would
compensate for changes in supply schedules if they occur. To date, we have not noticed any unusual
cost increases from our chassis suppliers. If the condition of the U.S. auto industry significantly
worsens, this could result in supply interruptions and a decrease in our sales and earnings while
we obtain replacement chassis from other sources.
Marketing and Distribution
We market our small and mid-size buses through a network of 68 independent dealers in the United
States and Canada. We select dealers using criteria similar to those used in selecting recreation
vehicle dealers. During fiscal 2010, one of our dealers accounted for 12% of the Companys
consolidated bus net sales. We also sell our small and mid-size buses directly to certain national
accounts such as major rental car companies, hotel chains, and transit authorities. Most of our bus
sales are derived from contracts with state and local transportation authorities, in some cases
with partial funding from federal agencies.
Terms of sale are typically cash on delivery or through national floor plan financing institutions.
Sales to some state transportation agencies and other government agencies may be on longer terms.
Backlog
As of July 31, 2010, the backlog for bus orders was $227,414, compared to $289,531 at July 31,
2009. The time for fulfillment of bus orders is substantially longer than in the recreation vehicle
industry because generally buses are made to customer specification. The existing backlog of bus
orders is expected to be filled in fiscal 2011.
Historically, the amount of our current backlog compared to our backlog in previous periods
reflects general economic and industry conditions and, together with other relevant factors such as
continued acceptance of our products by the consumer, may be an indicator of our revenues in the
near term.
Product Warranties
We generally provide retail purchasers of our buses with a limited warranty for one year or 12,000
miles against defects in materials and workmanship, excluding only certain specified components
which are separately warranted by suppliers. We provide body structure warranty on buses ranging
from 2 years or 50,000 miles to 5 years or 75,000 miles. The chassis and engines of our small and
mid-size buses are warranted for 3 years or 36,000 miles by their manufacturers. The chassis and
engines of our mid-size buses are warranted for 2 years or unlimited miles by their manufacturers.
Regulation
We are subject to the provisions of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act (NTMVSA)
and the safety standards for recreation vehicles, buses and recreation vehicle and bus components
which have been promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Department of Transportation. Because of our
sales in Canada, we are also governed by similar laws and regulations issued by the Canadian
government.
We are a member of the RVIA, a voluntary association of recreation vehicle manufacturers which
promulgates recreation vehicle safety standards. We place an RVIA seal on each of our recreation
vehicles to certify that the RVIAs standards have been met.
6
Both federal and state authorities have various environmental control standards relating to air,
water and noise pollution which affect our business and operations. For example, these standards,
which are generally applicable to all companies, control our choice of paints, discharge of air
compressor, waste water and noise emitted by factories. We rely upon certifications obtained by
chassis manufacturers with respect to compliance by our vehicles with all applicable emission
control standards.
We are also subject to the regulations promulgated by the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA). Our plants are periodically inspected by federal agencies concerned with
health and safety in the work place, and by the RVIA, to ensure that our plants and products comply
with applicable governmental and industry standards.
We believe that our products and facilities comply in all material respects with applicable vehicle
safety, environmental, RVIA and OSHA regulations.
We do not believe that ongoing compliance with the regulations discussed above will have a material
effect on our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.
Competition
Recreation Vehicles
The recreation vehicle industry is generally characterized by ease of entry, although the codes,
standards, and safety requirements introduced in recent years are a deterrent to new competitors.
The need to develop an effective dealer network also acts as a barrier to entry. The recreation
vehicle market is intensely competitive with a number of other manufacturers selling products which
compete directly with our products. Competition in the recreation vehicle industry is based upon
price, design, value, quality and service. We believe that the quality, design and price of our
products and the warranty coverage and service that we provide allow us to compete favorably for
retail purchasers of recreation vehicles. We estimate that we are the largest recreation vehicle
manufacturer in terms of units produced and revenue. According to Statistical Surveys, for the
seven months ending July 31, 2010, our market share for travel trailers and fifth wheels was 34%
and our market share for motorhomes was 18%.
Small and Mid-Size Buses
We estimate that we have a 36% market share of the U.S. and Canadian small and mid-size bus market,
according to the Mid Size Bus Manufacturers Association. Our competitors offer lines of buses which
compete with all of our products. Price, quality and delivery are the primary competitive factors.
As with recreation vehicles, we believe that the quality, design and price of our small and
mid-size buses, the warranty coverage and service that we provide, and the loyalty of our customers
allow us to compete favorably with similar products of our competitors.
Trademarks and Patents
We have registered United States and Canadian trademarks or licenses carrying the principal trade
names and model lines under which our products are marketed. We are not dependent upon any patents
or technology licenses for the conduct of our business.
Employee Relations
At July 31, 2010, we had approximately 6,950 full time employees in the United States of which 847
were salaried. Employees of our subsidiaries are not represented by certified labor organizations.
We believe that we maintain a good working relationship with our employees.
Information About Foreign and Domestic Operations and Export Sales
Sales from our Canadian operations (Citair) and export sales to Canada from our U.S. operations
amounted to approximately 0.4% and 16.0% in fiscal 2010, 0.9% and 15.6% in fiscal 2009, and 1.1%
and 15.9% in fiscal 2008, respectively, of our total net sales to unaffiliated customers. Export
sales to Canada from our U.S. operations were $364,105, $237,584, and $421,008 in fiscal 2010,
2009, and 2008, respectively. The Citair operations were sold on April 30, 2010.
Forward Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes certain statements that are forward looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward looking statements involve uncertainties
and risks. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from our expectations.
Factors
7
which could cause materially different results include, among others, additional issues that may
arise in connection with the findings of the completed investigation by the Audit Committee of the
Board of Directors and the SECs requests for additional information, fuel prices, fuel
availability, lower consumer confidence, interest rate increases, tight lending practices,
increased material costs, the success of new product introductions, the pace of acquisitions, cost
structure improvements, competition and general economic conditions and the other risks and
uncertainties discussed more fully in Item 1A. Risk Factors below. We disclaim any obligation or
undertaking to disseminate any updates or revisions to any forward looking statements contained in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K or to reflect any change in our expectations after the date of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any
statement is based, except as required by law.
Available Information
Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and
all amendments to those reports and the Proxy Statement for our Annual Meeting of Shareholders are
made available, free of charge, on our web site, http://www.thorindustries.com, as soon as
reasonably practicable after such reports have been filed with or furnished to the SEC. You may
also read and copy any materials that we file with the SEC at the SECs Public Reference Room at
100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of
the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains a
website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information that is filed
electronically with the SEC. The website can be accessed at
http://www.sec.gov.
The following risk factors should be considered carefully in addition to the other information
contained in this filing. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face
and represent some of the risks that our management believes are material to our Company and our
business. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or
results of operations could be harmed.
Risks Relating to Our Investigation
We have been subject to an SEC review regarding the facts and circumstances giving rise to the
restatement of our previously issued financial statements and related matters.
As previously announced, in connection with an internal review of our Dutchmen Manufacturing, Inc.
operating subsidiary in fiscal 2007, we promptly and voluntarily informed the SEC of the Audit
Committees independent investigation, and have from time to time responded to SEC staff requests
for additional information in connection with the staffs investigation. We have cooperated fully
with the SEC. The investigation by the SEC staff could result in the SEC seeking various penalties
and relief, including, without limitation, civil injunctive relief and civil monetary penalties. We
are currently discussing the terms of a possible settlement of this matter with the SEC staff,
however, there can be no assurance that a settlement will be reached.
Risks Relating To Our Business
The recreation vehicle and small and mid-size bus industries are highly competitive.
The recreation vehicle and bus industries that we are currently engaged in are highly competitive
and we have numerous existing and potential competitors. Competition in these industries is based
upon price, design, value, quality and service. Competitive pressures, especially in the recreation
vehicle market for travel trailers and motorhomes, have, from time to time, resulted in a reduction
of our profit margins. Sustained increases in these competitive pressures could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations. There can be no assurance that existing or new
competitors will not develop products that are superior to our recreation vehicles or small or
mid-size buses or that achieve better consumer acceptance, thereby adversely affecting our market
share, sales volume and profit margins.
Our businesses are cyclical and this can lead to fluctuations in our operating results.
The industries in which we operate are cyclical and there can be substantial fluctuations in our
manufacturing, shipments and operating results. Consequently, the results for any prior period may
not be indicative of results for any future period.
Our business may be affected by certain external factors beyond our control.
Companies within the recreation vehicle and bus industries are subject to volatility in operating
results due to external factors such as general economic conditions, including credit availability,
consumer confidence, employment rates, prevailing interest rates, inflation, other economic
conditions affecting consumer attitudes and disposable consumer income generally, demographic
changes and political changes. Specific factors affecting the recreation vehicle and bus industries
include:
8
|
|
|
overall consumer confidence and the level of discretionary consumer spending; |
|
|
|
|
inventory levels, including the level of retail sales by our dealers; |
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
demographics, such as the retirement of baby boomers; |
|
|
|
|
interest rates and the availability of credit; |
|
|
|
|
employment trends; |
|
|
|
|
the amount of backlog, which may be a predictor of near-term future revenues; |
|
|
|
|
fuel availability and prices; |
|
|
|
|
public policy involving mass transit; |
|
|
|
|
the adverse impact of terrorism on consumer spending and travel related activities; and |
|
|
|
|
increases in raw material costs. |
The loss of one or more of our significant dealers could have a significant effect on our business.
One dealer accounted for an aggregate of 12% of our consolidated bus sales for fiscal year 2010.
The loss of this dealer could have a significant effect on our bus business. Another dealer,
FreedomRoads, LLC, accounted for 18% of our consolidated recreation vehicle net sales and 15% of
our consolidated net sales for fiscal 2010. The loss of this dealer could have a significant
adverse effect on our business. In addition, deterioration in the liquidity or credit worthiness of
FreedomRoads, LLC could negatively impact our sales and accounts receivable and could trigger
repurchase obligations under our repurchase agreements.
Certain of our notes receivable may have collectability risk.
In January 2009, we entered into two credit agreements with Stephen Adams, in his individual
capacity, and Stephen Adams and his successors, as trustee under the Stephen Adams Living Trust
(the Trust and, together with each of the foregoing persons, the Borrowers), pursuant to which
we made two $10,000 loans to the Borrowers. The first loan matures on January 15, 2014 and the
second loan matures on June 30, 2012. In addition, in December 2009, we entered into a credit
agreement with Marcus Lemonis, Stephen Adams, in his individual capacity, and Stephen Adams and his
successors, as trustee under the Trust (collectively, the Third Loan Borrowers), pursuant to
which we made a $10,000 loan to the Third Loan Borrowers that matures on December 22, 2014. The
Borrowers and the Third Loan Borrowers own, directly or indirectly, a controlling interest in
FreedomRoads Holding Company, LLC, the parent company of FreedomRoads, LLC, our largest dealer.
While we believe that the notes receivable from the Borrowers and the Third Loan Borrowers are
collectible, deterioration in the liquidity or credit worthiness of the Borrowers or the Third Loan
Borrowers could impact the collectability of the notes receivable.
A significant portion of our sales of small and mid-size buses is derived from state and local
transportation authorities.
Approximately 73% of our bus sales for fiscal year 2010 were derived from contracts with state and
local transportation authorities, in most cases with partial funding from federal agencies. There
can be no assurance that these authorities will not reduce their expenditures for our buses in the
future as a result of budgetary constraints, decreased tax revenues or otherwise. A reduction in
the purchase of our buses by these authorities could have an adverse effect on our business and
results of operations.
Fuel shortages, or high prices for fuel, could have a negative effect on sales of our recreation
vehicles and buses.
Gasoline or diesel fuel is required for the operation of recreation vehicles and most of our buses.
There can be no assurance that the supply of these petroleum products will continue uninterrupted,
that rationing will not be imposed or that the price of or tax on these petroleum products will not
significantly increase in the future. Shortages of gasoline and diesel fuel and substantial
increases in the price of fuel have had a material adverse effect on the recreation vehicle
industry as a whole in the past and could have a material adverse effect on our business in the
future.
9
Our recreation vehicle business is seasonal, and this leads to fluctuations in sales, production
and net income.
We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, significant variability in sales,
production and net income as a result of seasonality in our businesses. Since recreation vehicles
are used primarily by vacationers and campers, demand in the recreation vehicle industry generally
declines during the winter season, while sales and profits are generally highest during the spring
and summer months. In addition, unusually severe weather conditions in some markets may delay the
timing of shipments from one quarter to another.
Our business is affected by the availability and terms of financing to dealers and retail
purchasers.
Our business is affected by the availability and terms of financing to dealers and retail
purchasers. Generally, recreation vehicle dealers finance their purchases of inventory with
financing provided by lending institutions. A decrease in the availability of this type of
wholesale financing has prevented many dealers from carrying adequate levels of inventory, which
limits product offerings and could lead to reduced demand. In addition, of the major financial
flooring institutions, two held 95% of our portion of our dealers total floored dollars outstanding
at July 31, 2010, reflecting the reduction in available lending sources. Substantial increases in
interest rates and decreases in the general availability of credit have also had an adverse impact
upon our business and results of operations in the past and may continue to do so in the future. In
particular, credit availability may have a significant impact on our business.
Changes in consumer preferences for our products or our failure to gauge those preferences could
lead to reduced sales and additional costs.
We cannot be certain that historical consumer preferences for our products in general, and
recreation vehicles in particular, will remain unchanged. We believe that the introduction of new
features, designs and models will be critical to the future success of our recreation vehicle
operations. Delays in the introduction of new models, designs or product features, or a lack of
market acceptance of new models, designs or product features, could have a material adverse effect
on our business. Products may not be accepted for a number of reasons, including changes in
consumer preferences or our failure to properly gauge consumer preferences. Further, we cannot be
certain that new product introductions will not reduce revenues from existing models and adversely
affect our results of operations. In addition, there can be no assurance that any of these new
models or products will be introduced to the market on time or that they will be successful when
introduced.
If the frequency and size of product liability and other claims against us rises, our business,
results of operations and financial condition may be harmed.
We are subject, in the ordinary course of business, to litigation involving product liability and
other claims against us, including wrongful death, personal injury and warranties. We partially
self-insure our product liability claims and also purchase product liability insurance in the
commercial insurance market. We cannot be certain that our insurance coverage will be sufficient to
cover all future claims against us. Any increase in the frequency and size of these claims, as
compared to our experience in prior years, may cause the premium that we are required to pay for
insurance to rise significantly. It may also increase the amounts we pay in punitive damages, not
all of which are covered by our insurance.
We have been named in approximately 616 complaints, some of which were originally styled as
putative class actions (with respect to which class certification was ultimately denied) and some
of which were filed by individual plaintiffs, filed against manufacturers of travel trailers and
manufactured homes supplied to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for use as
emergency living accommodations in the wake of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. The complaints have
been transferred to the Eastern District of Louisiana by the federal panel on multidistrict
litigation for consideration in a matter captioned In re FEMA Trailer Formaldehyde Products
Liability Litigation, Case Number MDL 07-1873, United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Louisiana. The complaints generally assert claims for damages (for health related
problems, medical expenses, emotional distress and lost earnings) and for medical monitoring costs
due to the presence of formaldehyde in the units. Some of the lawsuits also seek punitive and/or
exemplary damages. Thus far, however, none of the lawsuits allege a specific amount of damages
sought and instead make general allegations about the nature of the plaintiffs claims without
placing a dollar figure on them. Although we strongly dispute the allegations in these complaints,
and intend to vigorously defend ourselves in all such matters, we may be liable for damages if we
receive an unfavorable outcome.
When we introduce new products into the marketplace we may incur expenses that we did not
anticipate, which, in turn, can result in reduced earnings.
The introduction of new models of recreation vehicles and buses is critical to our future success.
We may incur unexpected expenses, however, when we introduce new models of recreation vehicles and
buses. For example, we may experience unexpected engineering or design flaws that will force a
recall of a new product. The costs resulting from these types of problems could be substantial, and
could have a significant adverse effect on our earnings.
10
Our repurchase agreements with floor plan lenders could result in increased costs.
In accordance with customary practice in the recreation vehicle industry, upon the request of a
lending institution financing a dealers purchase of our products, we will execute a repurchase
agreement with the lending institution. Repurchase agreements provide that, for up to 18 months
after a recreation vehicle is financed and in the event of default by the dealer, we will
repurchase the recreation vehicle repossessed by the lending institution for the amount then due,
which is usually less than 100% of the dealers cost. The difference between the gross repurchase
price and the price at which the repurchased product can then be resold, which is typically at a
discount to the original sale price, is an expense to us. Thus, if we were obligated to repurchase
a substantially greater number of recreation vehicles in the future, this would increase our costs.
In difficult economic times this amount could become material.
For some of our components, we depend on a small group of suppliers, and the loss of any of these
suppliers could affect our ability to obtain components at competitive prices, which would decrease
our margins.
Most recreation vehicle and bus components are readily available from a variety of sources.
However, a few components are produced by only a small group of quality suppliers that have the
capacity to supply large quantities on a national basis. Primarily, this occurs in the case of
chassis for our motorhomes and buses, where Ford Motor Company and General Motors are the dominant
suppliers. The recreation vehicle industry as a whole has from time to time experienced shortages
of chassis due to the concentration or allocation of available resources by suppliers of chassis to
the manufacturers of vehicles other than recreation vehicles or for other causes. Historically, in
the event of an industry-wide restriction of supply, Ford Motor Company and General Motors have
allocated chassis among us and our competitors based on the volume of chassis previously purchased.
If Ford Motor Company or General Motors were to discontinue the manufacturing of motorhome or bus
chassis, or if as a group all of our chassis suppliers significantly reduced the availability of
chassis to the industry, our business could be adversely affected. Similarly, shortages at, or
production delays or work stoppages by the employees of Ford Motor Company, General Motors or other
chassis suppliers, could have a material adverse effect on our sales. Finally, as is standard in
the industry, arrangements with chassis suppliers are terminable at any time by either our Company
or the chassis supplier. If we cannot obtain an adequate chassis supply, this could result in a
decrease in our sales and earnings.
We do not expect the current condition of the U.S. auto industry, including the bankruptcy
reorganizations of General Motors and Chrysler, to have a significant impact on our supply of
chassis. Supply of chassis is adequate for now and we believe that available inventory would
compensate for changes in supply schedules if they occur. To date, we have not noticed any unusual
cost increases from our chassis suppliers. If the condition of the U.S. auto industry significantly
worsens, this could result in supply interruptions and a decrease in our sales and earnings while
we obtain replacement chassis from other sources.
Our business is subject to numerous federal, state and local regulations.
We are subject to numerous federal, state and local regulations governing the manufacture and sale
of our products, including the provisions of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act
(NTMVSA) and the safety standards for recreation vehicles and components which have been
promulgated under the NTMVSA by the Department of Transportation. The NTMVSA authorizes the
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to require a manufacturer to recall and repair
vehicles which contain certain hazards or defects. Any recalls of our vehicles, voluntary or
involuntary, could have a material adverse effect on our Company.
We are also subject to federal and numerous state consumer protection and unfair trade practice
laws and regulations relating to the sale, transportation and marketing of motor vehicles,
including so-called Lemon Laws. Federal and state laws and regulations also impose upon vehicle
operators various restrictions on the weight, length and width of motor vehicles, including buses
and motorhomes, that may be operated in certain jurisdictions or on certain roadways. Certain
jurisdictions also prohibit the sale of vehicles exceeding length restrictions. Finally, federal
and state authorities also have various environmental control standards relating to air, water,
noise pollution and hazardous waste generation and disposal which affect our business and
operations. Failure to comply with any of the foregoing laws or regulations could have an adverse
impact on our business.
Risks Relating To Our Company
Provisions in our charter documents and of Delaware law may make it difficult for a third party to
acquire our Company and could depress the price of our common stock.
Our Restated Certificate of Incorporation contains certain supermajority voting provisions that
could delay, defer or prevent a change in control of our Company. These provisions could also make
it more difficult for shareholders to elect directors, amend our Restated Certificate of
Incorporation and take other corporate actions.
We are also subject to certain provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law that could delay,
deter or prevent us from entering into an acquisition, including provisions which prohibit a
Delaware corporation from engaging in a business combination with an interested
11
shareholder unless
specific conditions are met. The existence of these provisions could limit the price that investors
are willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock and may deprive investors of an
opportunity to sell shares at a premium over prevailing prices.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
12
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
We own or lease approximately 5,327,000 square feet of plant and office space. We believe that our
present facilities, consisting primarily of steel clad, steel or wood frame, and masonry
construction, and the machinery and equipment contained in these facilities, are well maintained
and in good condition. We believe that these facilities are adequate for our current and
foreseeable purposes and that we would be able to obtain replacements for our leased premises at
acceptable costs should our leases not be renewed.
The following table describes the location, number and size of our principal plants and other
materially important physical properties as of July 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. of |
|
|
Building Area |
|
Locations |
|
Owned or Leased |
|
|
Buildings |
|
|
Square Feet |
|
RVs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jackson Center, OH (Airstream) |
|
Owned |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
299,000 |
|
Oliver, B.C., Canada (Citair) (7) |
|
Owned |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
55,000 |
|
Middlebury, IN (Dutchmen) |
|
Owned |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
Burley, ID (Dutchmen) |
|
Owned |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
162,000 |
|
Goshen, IN (Dutchmen) |
|
Owned |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
414,000 |
|
Bristol, IN (Dutchmen) (7) |
|
Owned |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
54,000 |
|
Syracuse, IN (Dutchmen) |
|
Owned |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
Elkhart, IN (Four Winds)(Damon) |
|
Owned |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
707,000 |
|
Elkhart, IN (Four Winds) (1) |
|
Leased |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
Elkhart, IN (Damon) (7) |
|
Owned |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
79,000 |
|
Elkhart, IN (Damon) (2) |
|
Leased |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
26,000 |
|
Nappanee, IN (Breckenridge) |
|
Owned |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
144,000 |
|
Topeka, IN (CrossRoads) |
|
Owned |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
Clackamas, OR (Komfort) |
|
Owned |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
107,000 |
|
Moreno Valley, CA (3) |
|
Leased |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
166,000 |
|
Moreno Valley, CA (4) |
|
Leased |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
49,000 |
|
Goshen, IN (Keystone) (5) |
|
Leased |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
126,000 |
|
Goshen, IN (Keystone) |
|
Owned |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1,261,000 |
|
Pendleton, OR (Keystone) |
|
Owned |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
341,000 |
|
Pendleton, OR (Keystone) (6) |
|
Leased |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
63,000 |
|
Buses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salina, KS (ElDorado Kansas) |
|
Owned |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
255,000 |
|
Riverside, CA (ElDorado California) |
|
Owned |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
227,000 |
|
Imlay City, Michigan (Champion Bus) (General Coach) |
|
Owned |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
110,000 |
|
Elkhart, IN (Goshen Coach) |
|
Owned |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
Elkhart, IN (SJC Industries, Inc.) |
|
Owned |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
122,000 |
|
Elkhart, IN (SJC Industries, Inc.) (8) |
|
Leased |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
5,327,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This location is occupied under a net lease expiring in 2011. |
|
(2) |
|
These locations are under net leases expiring in 2013. Locations are currently vacant and are
on the market for sub-leasing. |
|
(3) |
|
This location is occupied under a net lease which expires in 2010. The lease will not be
renewed. |
|
(4) |
|
This location is occupied under a net lease which expires in 2010. The lease will not be
renewed. |
|
(5) |
|
These are occupied under net leases expiring in 2012 with an option to renew for 5 years and
are currently being utilized. |
|
(6) |
|
This location is occupied under a net lease expiring in 2011 with an option to renew for 7
years. |
|
(7) |
|
Locations are vacant and have been placed on the market. |
|
(8) |
|
This location is occupied under a net lease expiring in 2010 with an option to purchase the
building. |
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We have been subject to an SEC review regarding the facts and circumstances giving rise to the
restatement of our previously issued financial statements as of July 31, 2006 and 2005, and for
each of the years in the three-year period ended July 31, 2006, and the financial results in each
of the quarterly periods in 2006 and 2005, and our financial statements as of and for the three
months ended October 31, 2006 and related matters. We have cooperated fully with the SEC, including
from time to time responding to SEC staff requests for additional information. The investigation by
the SEC staff could result in the SEC seeking various penalties and relief, including, without
limitation, civil injunctive relief and/or civil monetary penalties or administrative relief. We
are currently discussing the terms of a possible settlement of this matter with the SEC staff,
however, there can be no assurances that a settlement will be reached.
13
The Company has been named in approximately 616 complaints, some of which were originally styled as
putative class actions (with respect to which class certification was ultimately denied) and some
of which were filed by individual plaintiffs, filed against manufacturers of travel trailers and
manufactured homes supplied to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for use as
emergency living accommodations in the wake of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. The complaints have
been transferred to the Eastern District of Louisiana by the federal panel on multidistrict
litigation for consideration in a matter captioned In re FEMA Trailer Formaldehyde Products
Liability Litigation, Case Number MDL 07-1873, United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Louisiana. The complaints generally assert claims for damages (for health related
problems, medical expenses, emotional distress and lost earnings) and for medical monitoring costs
due to the presence of formaldehyde in the units. Some of the lawsuits also seek punitive and/or
exemplary damages. Thus far, however, none of the lawsuits allege a specific amount of damages
sought and instead make general allegations about the nature of the plaintiffs claims without
placing a dollar figure on them. The Company strongly disputes the allegations in these complaints,
and intends to vigorously defend ourself in all such matters.
In addition, we are involved in certain litigation arising out of our operations in the normal
course of our business, most of which are based upon state lemon laws, warranty claims, other
claims and accidents (for which we carry insurance above a specified deductible amount). In this
regard, we were a party to two companion lawsuits pending in Jefferson County, Texas which were
brought against us and our affiliates, each of which arises from a March 29, 2006 crash of a bus
manufactured by one of our subsidiaries. At the mediation of the cases on June 15, 2010, a complete settlement of both cases was
reached. Formal settlement agreements were executed by each of the plaintiffs in August, and
counsel for all plaintiffs and cross-claimants have signed Notices of Nonsuit which were filed with
both courts. We have been informed that an Order of Dismissal was signed and entered in each of the
lawsuits, one on September 16, 2010 and the other on September 20, 2010, disposing of both
lawsuits.
While it is impossible to estimate with certainty the ultimate legal and financial liability with
respect to the litigation arising out of our operations in the normal course of business, including
the litigation described above, we believe that while the final resolution of any such litigation
may have an impact on our consolidated results for a particular reporting period, the ultimate
disposition of such litigation will not have any material adverse effect on our financial position,
results of operation or liquidity.
On June 25, 2010, we and certain of our officers and directors were sued in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Dayton Division by Teamsters Allied Benefit
Funds, individually and purportedly on behalf of a class of all those who purchased or acquired our
common stock between November 30, 2009 to June 10, 2010. The complaint alleged violations of
Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, alleging that our SEC filings and
press releases were false and misleading due to, among other things, our June 10, 2010 announcement
that our financial statements might need to be restated. We have since announced that a restatement
is not necessary. We believe the lawsuit was without merit, and the plaintiff agreed to voluntarily
dismiss the lawsuit without prejudice on September 7, 2010.
14
ITEM 4. REMOVED AND RESERVED
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF
EQUITY SECURITIES.
Market Information
The Companys Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share (the Common Stock), is traded on the New
York Stock Exchange (NYSE). Set forth below is the range of high and low prices for the Common
Stock for each quarter during the Companys two most recent fiscal years, as quoted in the NYSE
Monthly Market Statistics and Trading Reports:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
32.98 |
|
|
$ |
23.90 |
|
|
$ |
31.85 |
|
|
$ |
14.68 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
33.87 |
|
|
|
26.05 |
|
|
|
19.09 |
|
|
|
10.51 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
36.85 |
|
|
|
30.00 |
|
|
|
23.29 |
|
|
|
9.54 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
36.47 |
|
|
|
20.74 |
|
|
|
23.95 |
|
|
|
16.65 |
|
Holders
As of September 15, 2010, the number of holders of record of the Common Stock was 121.
Dividends
In fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, we paid a $.07 per share dividend in each quarter. In addition, we
paid a special $.50 per share dividend in our first quarter of fiscal 2010. Any payment of cash
dividends in the future will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend upon
our financial condition, capital requirements, earnings and any other factors which the Board of
Directors may deem relevant. There are no limitations on the Companys ability to pay dividends
pursuant to any credit facility.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
During 2010, we purchased shares of our Common Stock as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
(or Approximate Dollar Value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
|
of Shares that May Yet Be |
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Purchased Under the Plans |
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
Average Price Paid |
|
|
or Programs |
|
|
or Programs |
|
Period |
|
(a) |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
(b) |
|
|
(b) |
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
3,980,000 |
|
|
$ |
29.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total/Average |
|
|
3,980,000 |
|
|
$ |
29.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
We presently have no publicly announced repurchase program in place. In the second quarter of
fiscal 2010, the Company purchased 3,980,000 shares of common stock from the Estate of Wade
F.B. Thompson (the Estate) in a private transaction. The late Wade F.B. Thompson was Thors
former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. The repurchase transaction was
evaluated and approved by members of the Companys Board of Directors who are not affiliated with the Estate. At
the time of the purchase, the shares represented 7.2% of our outstanding common stock. |
|
(b) |
|
No publicly announced repurchase program in place. |
Equity Compensation Plan Information see Item 12
15
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Income statement data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,276,557 |
|
|
$ |
1,521,896 |
|
|
$ |
2,640,680 |
|
|
$ |
2,856,308 |
|
|
$ |
3,066,276 |
|
Net income (1) (2) (3) (4) |
|
|
110,064 |
|
|
|
17,143 |
|
|
|
92,706 |
|
|
|
134,731 |
|
|
|
163,405 |
|
Earnings per common share (1) (2) (3) (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
2.08 |
|
|
|
.31 |
|
|
|
1.67 |
|
|
|
2.42 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
2.07 |
|
|
|
.31 |
|
|
|
1.66 |
|
|
|
2.41 |
|
|
|
2.87 |
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
|
.78 |
|
|
|
.28 |
|
|
|
2.28 |
|
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
|
.19 |
|
Dividends paid per common share |
|
|
.78 |
|
|
|
.28 |
|
|
|
2.28 |
|
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
|
.49 |
|
Balance sheet data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets (1) (2) (3) |
|
$ |
964,073 |
|
|
$ |
951,124 |
|
|
$ |
996,562 |
|
|
$ |
1,059,297 |
|
|
$ |
1,004,725 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Selected financial data for 2010 includes a non-cash trademark impairment of $500 for the
trademark associated with a subsidiary in our towables segment. |
|
(2) |
|
Selected financial data for 2009 includes non-cash goodwill and trademark impairments of
$9,717 and $564, respectively, for the goodwill and trademarks associated with subsidiaries in
our motorized segment. |
|
(3) |
|
Selected financial data for 2008 includes a non-cash goodwill impairment of $7,535 for the
goodwill associated with a subsidiary within our motorized segment, an impairment of $1,962 to
adjust certain properties to fair market value and provisions of $5,411 recorded in connection
with the sale of our Thor California travel trailer and fifth wheel business. |
|
(4) |
|
Selected financial data for 2007 includes expenses of $6,858 as a direct result of the Audit
Committees investigation and the Companys review of the accounting practices at Dutchmen and
certain of our other operating subsidiaries. These costs primarily consist of professional
services for legal, accounting and tax guidance. In addition, we incurred costs relating to
the audit of our restated consolidated financial statements. |
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Executive Overview
We were founded in 1980 and have grown to be the largest manufacturer of Recreation Vehicles
(RVs) and a major manufacturer of commercial buses in North America. Our market share in the
travel trailer and fifth wheel segment of the industry (towables) is approximately 34% before
giving effect to the Heartland acquisition. In the motorized segment of the industry we have a
market share of approximately 18%. Our market share in small and mid-size buses is approximately
36%. We also manufacture and sell 40-foot buses at our facility in Southern California.
On March 1, 2010, we acquired SJC Industries Corp. (SJC), a privately-held manufacturer of
ambulances based in Elkhart, Indiana. We believe that SJC is currently the second largest
manufacturer of ambulances in the United States. The operations of SJC are included in the
Companys operating results from the date of its acquisition.
We have included the operations of SJC in our buses reportable segment because we believe the
ambulance business is a natural fit with Thors bus business. SJC has similar
economic characteristics to our bus businesses and the nature of products, production
processes, types of customers, distribution channels and regulatory
environment are also similar to those within our bus businesses.
Our growth has been internal and by acquisition. Our strategy has been to increase our
profitability in North America in the RV industry and in the bus business through product
innovation, service to our customers, manufacturing quality products, improving our facilities and
acquisitions. We have not entered unrelated businesses and have no plans to do so in the future.
We rely on internally generated cash flows from operations to finance our growth although we may
borrow to make an acquisition if we believe the incremental cash flows will provide for rapid
payback. Capital expenditures of $12,767 in fiscal 2010 were made primarily to purchase land and
buildings to expand our towable operations, replace buildings and equipment at our Champion
facility that were destroyed by a fire, upgrade IT systems and replace machinery and equipment used
in the ordinary course of business.
Our business model includes decentralized operating units and we compensate operating management
primarily with cash based upon the profitability of the business unit which they manage. Our
corporate staff provides financial management, purchasing, insurance, legal and human resource,
risk management and internal audit functions. Senior corporate management interacts regularly with
operating management to assure that corporate objectives are understood clearly and are monitored
appropriately.
16
Our RV products are sold to dealers who, in turn, retail those products. Our buses are sold through
dealers to municipalities and private purchasers such as rental car companies and hotels. We
generally do not finance dealers directly but do provide repurchase agreements to assist the
dealers in obtaining floor plan financing.
On November 13, 2009, we reported that Wade F.B. Thompson, our co-founder and former Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer, passed away. He was succeeded by Peter B. Orthwein, also a
co-founder of the Company, to the offices of Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. We
proceeded with our business uninterrupted.
On February 14, 2010, a fire resulted in the total loss of our 92,000 square foot Champion/General
Coach of America (GCA) north bus production facility. We reacted immediately and consolidated
production into our 92,000 square foot south facility, which was unaffected by the fire, and leased
a 59,000 square foot facility on a monthly basis. We resumed production on February 25, 2010 and no
significant orders were lost due to the fire. A new Champion/GCA plant is being built and it is
substantially completed and operational as of September 28, 2010.
In October 2009, we decided to close our Citair General Coach production facility in Oliver,
British Columbia and move all General Coach RV and park model production to our other Citair
General Coach facility in Hensall, Ontario. As of April 30, 2010, all production ceased at the
Citair Oliver facility. Related closure costs of approximately $3,640 were recorded in fiscal 2010,
consisting of $1,710 primarily in cost of products sold for inventory and warranty and $1,930 in
severance and other costs included in selling, general and administrative expenses.
On April 30, 2010, we sold our Citair travel trailer and park model business to a former member of
Citairs management. Citair did business in Canada under the names General Coach, Hensall and
General Coach, Oliver. We recorded a $323 pre-tax loss on the sale.
In the second quarter of fiscal year 2010, we purchased 3,980,000 shares of our common stock at
$29.00 per share at a total cost of $115,420 and currently hold the shares as treasury stock. We
repurchased the shares from the Estate of Wade F.B. Thompson (the Estate) in a private
transaction. The repurchase transaction was evaluated and approved by members of our Board of
Directors who were not affiliated with the Estate. At the time of the repurchase, the shares
represented 7.2% of our outstanding common stock. We used available cash to purchase the shares.
On September 16, 2010, we acquired 100% of Towables Holdings, Inc., parent company of Heartland
Recreation Vehicles, LLC (Heartland) pursuant to a stock
purchase agreement for $99,562 in cash, subject to adjustment,
and 4,300,000 shares of our common stock. Heartland is located in Elkhart,
Indiana and is a major manufacturer of towable recreation vehicles. Under our ownership, Heartland
will continue as an independent operation, in the same manner as our existing recreation vehicle
and bus companies, and its operations will be included in our towable segment.
The acquisition of Heartland is expected to be accretive to our earnings, based upon Heartlands recent and
historical performances. From its founding in 2003, Heartland has become the third largest
manufacturer of fifth wheels and the sixth largest manufacturer of travel trailers in the United
States based upon Statistical Surveys retail market data as of June, 2010. Heartland has been the
fastest growing RV manufacturer in recent years, and its sales over the last 12 months exceeded
$400,000. Its brands include Bighorn, Sundance, Cyclone, North Country, and North Trail, sold
through a nationwide network of dealers.
Trends and Business Outlook
Industry conditions in the RV market have been adversely affected over the past two years by low
consumer confidence, tighter lending practices and the general economic downturn. As a result, in
fiscal 2009 retail sales decreased and dealers significantly reduced their inventory levels.
Wholesale and retail credit availability has improved, resulting in significantly less
discounting in fiscal 2010 as compared to fiscal 2009. According to the RVIA economist, Dr. Richard
Curtin, who is the Director of Surveys of Consumers at the University of Michigan, 2010 calendar
year wholesale shipments are forecast to total 239,900 units, a 45% increase over 2009. RVIA
forecasts that 2011 calendar year shipments will total 259,600 units, a further 8% improvement over
expected 2010 wholesale shipments.
During fiscal 2010 we have experienced growth in our sales and margins. If retail and wholesale credit availability continues to
improve, we expect to see a continuing rebound in sales and expect to benefit from our ability to
ramp up production in an industry with fewer manufacturing facilities than before, due to
competitor failures or plant consolidations. A longer-term positive outlook for the recreation
vehicle segment is supported by favorable demographics as baby boomers reach the age brackets that
historically have accounted for the bulk of retail RV sales, and an increase in interest in the RV
lifestyle among both older and younger segments of the population.
Retail demand is the key to a sustained recovery. While the RVIA cites dealers restocking and an
improving trend in RV sales to consumers, it also notes that poor employment and income growth as
well as continuing credit constraints could slow the pace of the RV recovery. In addition,
commercial credit is still a significant restriction for many dealers and there is concern
regarding the slowing of RV dealer restocking. For the towable segment, retail sales as reported by
Statistical Surveys, Inc. increased 6% for the seven months ended July 31, 2010 compared
17
with the same period in 2009. The motorized segment was down approximately 0.3%. Tighter retail
credit and lower consumer confidence appear to affect the motorized segment more severely. The
retail price of a towable recreation vehicle is generally less than that of a motorhome and sales
of more expensive recreation vehicles have suffered greater in the recent economic downturn.
Economic or industry-wide factors affecting our recreation vehicle business include raw material
costs of commodities used in the manufacture of our product. Material cost is the primary factor
determining our cost of products sold. We are starting to witness increases in the cost of our raw
materials. Steel, aluminum, and thermoplastic prices have increased and there continues to be
upward price pressure on several of our other raw materials. Future increases in raw material costs
would impact our profit margins negatively if we were unable to raise prices for our products by
corresponding amounts. Historically, we have been able to pass along those price increases to
consumers.
Government entities are the primary users of our buses. Demand in this segment is subject to
fluctuations in government spending on transit. In addition, hotel and rental car companies are
also major users of our small and mid-size buses and therefore travel is an important indicator for
this market. The majority of our buses have a 5-year useful life and are being continuously
replaced by operators. According to the Mid Size Bus Manufacturers Association, unit sales of small
and mid-sized buses increased 6.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared with the same
period in 2009. Federal stimulus funds have helped the transit industry in the recent economic
downturn, however that funding is slowing down and that is expected to have a negative effect on
demand for our bus products. Ridership and municipal budgets are reduced and transit agencies
operating costs have increased. This softening has slowed order input at some of our bus operations
and we have reduced staff levels in certain locations.
We do not expect the current condition of the U.S. auto industry, including the bankruptcy
reorganizations of General Motors and Chrysler, to have a significant impact on our supply of
chassis. Supply of chassis is adequate for now and we believe that available inventory would
compensate for changes in supply schedules if they occur. To date, we have not noticed any unusual
cost increases from our chassis suppliers. If the condition of the U.S. auto industry significantly
worsens, this could result in supply interruptions and a decrease in our sales and earnings while
we obtain replacement chassis from other sources.
18
FISCAL 2010 VS. FISCAL 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
NET SALES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recreation Vehicles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towables |
|
$ |
1,556,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
953,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
603,312 |
|
|
|
63.3 |
|
Motorized |
|
|
291,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,231 |
|
|
|
80.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Recreation Vehicles |
|
|
1,848,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,115,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
733,543 |
|
|
|
65.8 |
|
Buses |
|
|
428,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
406,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,118 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,276,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,521,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
754,661 |
|
|
|
49.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# OF UNITS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recreation Vehicles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towables |
|
|
69,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,504 |
|
|
|
61.2 |
|
Motorized |
|
|
3,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,801 |
|
|
|
83.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Recreation Vehicles |
|
|
73,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,305 |
|
|
|
62.3 |
|
Buses |
|
|
6,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
79,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,185 |
|
|
|
54.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
GROSS PROFIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recreation Vehicles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towables |
|
$ |
235,858 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
$ |
111,475 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
$ |
124,383 |
|
|
|
111.6 |
|
Motorized |
|
|
26,628 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
26,356 |
|
|
|
9,689.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Recreation Vehicles |
|
|
262,486 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
111,747 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
150,739 |
|
|
|
134.9 |
|
Buses |
|
|
44,600 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
40,790 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
3,810 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
307,086 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
$ |
152,537 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
$ |
154,549 |
|
|
|
101.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SELLING, GENERAL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recreation Vehicles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towables |
|
$ |
88,921 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
$ |
64,441 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
$ |
24,480 |
|
|
|
38.0 |
|
Motorized |
|
|
15,942 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
19,695 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
(3,753 |
) |
|
|
(19.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Recreation Vehicles |
|
|
104,863 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
84,136 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
20,727 |
|
|
|
24.6 |
|
Buses |
|
|
21,857 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
22,782 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
(925 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
Corporate |
|
|
20,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,027 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
147,407 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
$ |
124,578 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
$ |
22,829 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recreation Vehicles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towables |
|
$ |
145,604 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
$ |
47,347 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
98,257 |
|
|
|
207.5 |
|
Motorized |
|
|
10,628 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
(29,728 |
) |
|
|
(18.4 |
) |
|
|
40,356 |
|
|
|
135.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Recreation Vehicles |
|
|
156,232 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
17,619 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
138,613 |
|
|
|
786.7 |
|
Buses |
|
|
29,904 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
17,422 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
12,482 |
|
|
|
71.6 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
(14,743 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,646 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,097 |
) |
|
|
(26.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
171,393 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
$ |
23,395 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
147,998 |
|
|
|
632.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
ORDER BACKLOG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recreation Vehicles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towables |
|
$ |
195,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
262,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(66,284 |
) |
|
|
(25.3 |
) |
Motorized |
|
|
65,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,272 |
|
|
|
80.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Recreation Vehicles |
|
|
261,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,012 |
) |
|
|
(12.4 |
) |
Buses |
|
|
227,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
289,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62,117 |
) |
|
|
(21.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
488,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
587,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(99,129 |
) |
|
|
(16.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
CONSOLIDATED
Net sales and gross profit for fiscal 2010 increased 49.6% and 101.3%, respectively, compared to
fiscal 2009. Selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal 2010 increased 18.3% compared
to fiscal 2009. Income before income taxes for fiscal 2010 increased 632.6% compared to fiscal
2009. The specifics on changes in net sales, gross profit, selling, general and administrative
expense and income before income taxes are addressed in the segment reporting below.
Corporate costs in selling, general and administrative expenses were $20,687 for fiscal 2010
compared to $17,660 for fiscal 2009. This increase of $3,027 includes increases in compensation and
related expenses of $3,749, partially due to bonus increases driven by the increase in income
before income taxes, and a $3,605 increase in product liability insurance costs, partly
attributable to increased sales activity. In addition, Corporate costs increased $627 related to
costs incurred in conjunction with the closure of our retail finance company (Thor CC). The
Companys expense for probable losses related to vehicle repurchase commitments, however, decreased
by $5,184 due to a significant decrease in actual fiscal 2010 and anticipated future repurchase
activity correlating with the improvement in the RV industry and our strengthened dealer base.
Corporate interest and other income was $5,944 in fiscal 2010 compared to $6,014 for fiscal 2009.
The $70 decrease is primarily the net effect of increased interest on our notes receivable of
$3,341, due to higher balances and fiscal 2010 being the first full year of interest on these
notes, offset by a decrease of $3,459 in interest income on our cash and investments due to lower
investment balances and lower interest rates.
The overall annual effective tax rate for fiscal 2010 was 35.8% on $171,393 of income before income
taxes, compared to 26.7% on $23,395 of income before income taxes for fiscal 2009. The primary
reasons for this increase in rate were a reduced benefit in fiscal 2010 resulting from the
expiration of the federal research and development credit on December 31, 2009 and adjustments to
our income tax payable and deferred tax balances, offset by the relationship between higher pre-tax
income relative to certain permanent financial accounting to taxable income adjustments.
The changes in costs and price within our business due to inflation were not significantly
different from inflation in the United States economy as a whole. Levels of capital investment,
pricing and inventory investment were not materially affected by changes caused by inflation.
20
SEGMENT REPORTING
Towable Recreation Vehicles
Analysis of Change in Net Sales for Fiscal 2010 vs. Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
NET SALES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Travel Trailers |
|
$ |
799,249 |
|
|
|
51.3 |
|
|
$ |
489,637 |
|
|
|
51.3 |
|
|
$ |
309,612 |
|
|
|
63.2 |
|
Fifth Wheels |
|
|
727,167 |
|
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
|
425,826 |
|
|
|
44.7 |
|
|
|
301,341 |
|
|
|
70.8 |
|
Other |
|
|
30,175 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
37,816 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
(7,641 |
) |
|
|
(20.2 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Towables |
|
$ |
1,556,591 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
953,279 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
603,312 |
|
|
|
63.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
|
Shipments |
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
|
Shipments |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
# OF UNITS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Travel Trailers |
|
|
45,453 |
|
|
|
65.1 |
|
|
|
28,292 |
|
|
|
65.4 |
|
|
|
17,161 |
|
|
|
60.7 |
|
Fifth Wheels |
|
|
23,421 |
|
|
|
33.6 |
|
|
|
13,823 |
|
|
|
31.9 |
|
|
|
9,598 |
|
|
|
69.4 |
|
Other |
|
|
930 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
(255 |
) |
|
|
(21.5 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Towables |
|
|
69,804 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
43,300 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
26,504 |
|
|
|
61.2 |
|
|
|
|
IMPACT OF CHANGE IN PRICE ON NET SALES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
Increase |
Towables |
|
|
|
|
Travel
Trailers |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
Fifth Wheels |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
Other |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
Total Towables |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
The increase in towable net sales of 63.3% resulted primarily from a 61.2% increase in unit
shipments and a 2.1% increase in the impact of the change in the net price per unit. The overall
industry increase in wholesale unit shipments of towables for August 2009 through July 2010, as compared with the same period the prior year, was
68.0%, according to statistics published by the RVIA.
The impact of the change in net price per unit of towables was an increase of 2.1%, which included
increases in travel trailers of 2.5% and increases in fifth wheels of 1.4% in fiscal year 2010 as
compared to fiscal year 2009. The primary reason for the small increases in the change in the net
price per unit is reduced discounting in fiscal 2010 as compared to fiscal 2009 due to improved
market conditions, as prices before the effects of discounting were consistent with fiscal 2009.
Cost of products sold increased $478,929 to $1,320,733, or 84.8% of towable net sales, for fiscal
2010 compared to $841,804, or 88.3% of towable net sales, for fiscal 2009. The change in material,
labor, freight-out and warranty comprised $465,736 of the $478,929 increase in cost of products
sold and was due to increased sales volume. Material, labor, freight-out and warranty as a combined
percentage of towable net sales decreased to 78.8% from 79.8% from fiscal 2009 to 2010. This 1.0%
decrease as a percentage of towable net sales is due to a reduction in discounting in fiscal 2010,
which effectively increases net sales per unit and therefore lowers the unit material cost
percentage to net sales, and a reduction in freight delivery costs as a percentage of towable net
sales. Continuing procurement efficiencies also helped reduce material costs. Total manufacturing
overhead increased $13,193 to $94,030 in fiscal 2010 compared to $80,837 in fiscal 2009. Variable
costs in manufacturing overhead increased $15,111 to $83,790 or 5.4% of towable net sales for
fiscal 2010 compared to $68,679 or 7.2% of towable net sales for fiscal 2009 due to increased
production. Fixed costs in manufacturing overhead, which consists primarily of facility costs,
property taxes and depreciation, decreased $1,918 to $10,240 in fiscal 2010 from $12,158 in fiscal
2009 reflecting the full year benefits of plant rationalization efforts undertaken during fiscal
2009.
21
Towable gross profit increased $124,383 to $235,858, or 15.2% of towable net sales, for fiscal 2010
compared to $111,475, or 11.7% of towable net sales, for fiscal 2009. The increase in gross profit
was due primarily to the 61.2% increase in unit sales volume and the reduced discounting in fiscal
2010.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $88,921, or 5.7% of towable net sales, for fiscal
2010 compared to $64,441, or 6.8% of towable net sales, for fiscal 2009. The primary reason for the
$24,480 increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was increased towable net sales
and income before income taxes, which caused related commissions, bonuses and other compensation to
increase by $25,078. Other compensation also increased $1,781 for costs recognized related to the
closure of General Coach, Oliver in fiscal 2010. These increases were partially offset by a
decrease of $1,932 in vehicle repurchase losses as a result of the improvement in the industry in
fiscal 2010.
Towable income before income taxes increased to 9.4% of towable net sales for fiscal 2010 from 5.0%
of towable net sales for fiscal 2009. The primary factors for this increase were the increase in
unit sales coupled with reduced discounting and cost reductions as a percentage of net sales noted
above.
Motorized Recreation Vehicles
Analysis of Change in Net Sales for Fiscal 2010 vs. Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
NET SALES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Motorized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A |
|
$ |
167,679 |
|
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
$ |
89,477 |
|
|
|
55.3 |
|
|
$ |
78,202 |
|
|
|
87.4 |
|
Class C |
|
|
110,745 |
|
|
|
37.9 |
|
|
|
62,789 |
|
|
|
38.8 |
|
|
|
47,956 |
|
|
|
76.4 |
|
Other |
|
|
13,534 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
9,461 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
4,073 |
|
|
|
43.1 |
|
|
|
|
Total Motorized |
|
$ |
291,958 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
161,727 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
130,231 |
|
|
|
80.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
|
Shipments |
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
|
Shipments |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Change |
|
| |
|
|
# OF UNITS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Motorized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A |
|
|
1,738 |
|
|
|
43.8 |
|
|
|
913 |
|
|
|
42.2 |
|
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
90.4 |
|
Class C |
|
|
2,056 |
|
|
|
51.9 |
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
52.2 |
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
81.8 |
|
Other |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
42.1 |
|
|
|
|
Total Motorized |
|
|
3,966 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
2,165 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
1,801 |
|
|
|
83.2 |
|
|
|
|
IMPACT OF CHANGE IN PRICE ON NET SALES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
Increase/(Decrease) |
Motorized |
|
|
|
|
Class A |
|
|
(3.0 |
)% |
Class C |
|
|
(5.4 |
)% |
Other |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
Total Motorized |
|
|
(2.7 |
)% |
The increase in motorized net sales of 80.5% resulted primarily from an 83.2% increase in unit
shipments and a 2.7% decrease in the impact of the change in net price per unit. The overall
industry increase in wholesale unit shipments of motorhomes for the period August 2009 through July
2010, as compared with the same period the prior year, was 71.3% according to statistics published by the RVIA.
The impact of the change in the net price per unit of motorized was a decrease of 2.7%. The
decrease in the net price per unit within the Class A product line is primarily due to increased
demand for the more moderately priced gas units as compared to the generally larger and more
expensive diesel units. Within the Class C product line, customer demand is currently trending
toward the lower to more moderately priced models. These trends were partially offset by a
reduction in discounting in fiscal 2010 due to improved market conditions.
22
Cost of products sold increased $103,875 to $265,330, or 90.9% of motorized net sales, for fiscal
2010 compared to $161,455, or 99.8% of motorized net sales, for fiscal 2009. The change in
material, labor, freight-out and warranty comprised $105,843 of the $103,875 increase in cost of
products sold and was due to increased sales volume. Material, labor, freight-out and warranty as a
combined percentage of motorized net sales decreased to 84.7% from 87.4% from fiscal 2009 to 2010.
This 2.7% decrease as a percentage of motorized net sales is due to a reduction in discounts in
fiscal 2010, which therefore increased net sales per unit and thereby lowered the unit material
costs as a percentage of motorized net sales. Material costs in relation to gross sales actually
increased in fiscal 2010 as compared with fiscal 2009, due to the favorable impact of LIFO
inventory liquidations of $4,430 in fiscal 2009, but the discount reduction in fiscal 2010 more
than offset this impact. In addition, labor efficiencies were improved in fiscal 2010 as a result
of the volume increases and warranty costs were reduced due to continued product enhancements and
improvements. Total manufacturing overhead costs decreased $1,968 to $18,115 in fiscal 2010
compared to $20,083 in fiscal 2009. Variable costs in manufacturing overhead decreased $1,408 to
$14,512, or 5.0% of motorized net sales, for fiscal 2010 compared to $15,920, or 9.8% of motorized
net sales, for fiscal 2009 due to more favorable group medical insurance experience and additional
plant rearrangement costs incurred in fiscal 2009. Fixed costs in manufacturing overhead, which
consists primarily of facility costs, property taxes and depreciation, decreased $560 to $3,603 in
fiscal 2010 from $4,163 in fiscal 2009.
Motorized gross profit increased $26,356 to $26,628, or 9.1% of motorized net sales, for fiscal
2010 compared to $272, or 0.2% of motorized net sales, for fiscal 2009. The increase in gross
profit was due primarily to the 83.2% increase in unit sales volume, reduced discounting and cost
reductions as a percentage of motorized sales noted above.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $15,942 or 5.5% of motorized net sales for fiscal
2010 compared to $19,695 or 12.2% of motorized net sales for fiscal 2009. The decrease of $3,753 is
primarily due to a $3,636 reduction in legal and settlement costs and a decrease of $1,806 in
vehicle repurchase losses. Advertising costs also decreased $883 due to cost reduction initiatives.
These decreases were partially offset by the impact of the increase in motorized net sales and
income before taxes, which increased related commissions, bonuses and other compensation costs by
$2,293, and an increase in depreciation expense of $625 due to the implementation of a new
financial reporting package.
Motorized income before income taxes was 3.6% of motorized net sales for fiscal 2010 and a negative
18.4% of motorized net sales for fiscal 2009. This reflects the impact of the increase in unit
sales, reduced discounting and the related impact on gross profit in fiscal 2010. In addition,
fiscal 2009 was negatively impacted by goodwill and trademark impairments of $9,717 and $564,
respectively, at two of our motorized subsidiaries.
Buses
Analysis of Change in Net Sales for Fiscal 2010 vs. Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
428,008 |
|
|
$ |
406,890 |
|
|
$ |
21,118 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
# of Units |
|
|
6,025 |
|
|
|
6,145 |
|
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
Impact of Change in Price on Net Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
The increase in buses net sales of 5.2% resulted from a 2.0% decrease in unit shipments and a 7.2%
increase from the impact of the change in net price per unit. Recently acquired SJC accounted for
$13,218 of the $21,118 increase in net sales.
The 7.2% increase in the impact of the change in net price per unit of buses is primarily due to a
greater concentration of high end products and more favorable pricing in the high end market
segment. In addition, the U.S. governments emphasis on mass transportation in the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 stimulus package also enabled us to secure more sales of our
larger, higher price buses.
Cost of products sold increased $17,308 to $383,408, or 89.6% of buses net sales, for fiscal 2010
compared to $366,100, or 90.0% of buses net sales, for fiscal 2009. The increase in material,
labor, freight-out and warranty represents $17,208 of the $17,308 increase in cost of products
sold. Material, labor, freight-out and warranty as a combined percentage of buses net sales
remained unchanged at 82.4%, and the individual relationships of each to buses net sales did not
vary significantly in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009. Total manufacturing overhead increased
$100 to $30,895 in fiscal 2010 compared to $30,795 in fiscal 2009. Variable costs in manufacturing
overhead increased $161 to $28,710, or 6.7% of buses net sales, for fiscal 2010 compared to
$28,549, or 7.0% of buses net sales, for fiscal 2009. Fixed costs in manufacturing overhead, which
consist primarily of facility costs, property taxes, and depreciation decreased $61 to $2,185 in
fiscal 2010 from $2,246 in fiscal 2009.
23
Buses gross profit increased $3,810 to $44,600, or 10.4% of buses net sales, for fiscal 2010
compared to $40,790, or 10.0% of buses net sales, for fiscal 2009. The increase in gross profit
resulted primarily from the increase in net sales and the change in cost of products sold as
discussed above.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $21,857, or 5.1% of buses net sales, for fiscal
2010 compared to $22,782, or 5.6% of buses net sales, for fiscal 2009. The primary reason for the net
$925 decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses is a reduction in costs of $3,979 due
to providing for one large product liability claim (which has since been settled) in fiscal 2009. In addition,
litigation settlement expense decreased $830 due to having provided for one larger settlement in fiscal 2009. These
decreases were partially offset in fiscal 2010 by the effects of increased buses net sales and buses income before
income taxes, which caused related bonuses, commissions, other compensation and payroll taxes to
increase $1,844, increased legal costs of $1,162 related to settling the large product liability
claim from fiscal 2009, and a $432 increase in other sales incentive costs.
Buses income before income taxes increased to 7.0% of buses net sales for fiscal 2010 from 4.3% of
buses net sales for fiscal 2009. This reflects the impact of the decrease in selling, general and
administrative expenses and the increases in sales and gross profit, each as discussed above.
24
FISCAL 2009 VS. FISCAL 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
NET SALES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recreation Vehicles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towables |
|
$ |
953,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,763,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(809,820 |
) |
|
|
(45.9 |
) |
Motorized |
|
|
161,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
461,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(300,129 |
) |
|
|
(65.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Recreation Vehicles |
|
|
1,115,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,224,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,109,949 |
) |
|
|
(49.9 |
) |
Buses |
|
|
406,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,835 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,521,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,640,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,118,784 |
) |
|
|
(42.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# OF UNITS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recreation Vehicles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towables |
|
|
43,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,588 |
) |
|
|
(45.1 |
) |
Motorized |
|
|
2,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,698 |
) |
|
|
(63.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Recreation Vehicles |
|
|
45,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,286 |
) |
|
|
(46.4 |
) |
Buses |
|
|
6,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
51,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,421 |
) |
|
|
(43.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
GROSS PROFIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recreation Vehicles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towables |
|
$ |
111,475 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
$ |
246,505 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
$ |
(135,030 |
) |
|
|
(54.8 |
) |
Motorized |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
35,928 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
(35,656 |
) |
|
|
(99.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Recreation Vehicles |
|
|
111,747 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
282,433 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
(170,686 |
) |
|
|
(60.4 |
) |
Buses |
|
|
40,790 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
39,993 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
152,537 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
$ |
322,426 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
$ |
(169,889 |
) |
|
|
(52.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SELLING, GENERAL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recreation Vehicles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towables |
|
$ |
64,441 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
$ |
102,356 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
$ |
(37,915 |
) |
|
|
(37.0 |
) |
Motorized |
|
|
19,695 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
28,899 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
(9,204 |
) |
|
|
(31.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Recreation Vehicles |
|
|
84,136 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
131,255 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
(47,119 |
) |
|
|
(35.9 |
) |
Buses |
|
|
22,782 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
18,088 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
4,694 |
|
|
|
26.0 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
17,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,065 |
) |
|
|
(36.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
124,578 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
$ |
177,068 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
$ |
(52,490 |
) |
|
|
(29.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recreation Vehicles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towables |
|
$ |
47,347 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
146,306 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
$ |
(98,959 |
) |
|
|
(67.6 |
) |
Motorized |
|
|
(29,728 |
) |
|
|
(18.4 |
) |
|
|
(522 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(29,206 |
) |
|
|
(5,595.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Recreation Vehicles |
|
|
17,619 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
145,784 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
(128,165 |
) |
|
|
(87.9 |
) |
Buses |
|
|
17,422 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
21,132 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
(3,710 |
) |
|
|
(17.6 |
) |
Corporate |
|
|
(11,646 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,509 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,863 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
23,395 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
152,407 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
$ |
(129,012 |
) |
|
|
(84.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
ORDER BACKLOG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recreation Vehicles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towables |
|
$ |
262,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
106,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
155,280 |
|
|
|
145.4 |
|
Motorized |
|
|
36,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,518 |
) |
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Recreation Vehicles |
|
|
298,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,762 |
|
|
|
104.9 |
|
Buses |
|
|
289,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,726 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
587,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
406,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
181,488 |
|
|
|
44.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
CONSOLIDATED
Net sales and gross profit for fiscal 2009 decreased 42.4% and 52.7%, respectively, compared to
fiscal 2008. Selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal 2009 decreased 29.6% compared
to fiscal 2008. Income before income taxes for fiscal 2009 decreased 84.6% compared to fiscal 2008.
The specifics on changes in net sales, gross profit, selling, general and administrative expense
and income before income taxes are addressed in the segment reporting below.
Corporate costs in selling, general and administrative were $17,660 for fiscal 2009 compared to
$27,725 for fiscal 2008. This decrease of $10,065 is primarily due to a decrease of $3,142 in
insurance related expense, $1,532 in audit and tax related fees, $1,414 in self-insured workers
compensation costs, $1,569 in legal and professional fees, and $828 in incentive based
compensation. These decreases resulted from the overall decline in our business and cost reduction
efforts. In addition, the Companys expense for probable losses related to vehicle repurchase
commitments decreased by $1,176 due to a decrease in actual and anticipated repurchase activity
resulting from lower dealer inventory. Corporate interest and other income was $6,014 for fiscal
2009 compared to $13,333 for fiscal 2008. The decrease of $7,319 is attributed to a $5,792 decrease
in interest income due to lower interest rates and the contractual terms of our auction rate
securities which restrict the maximum yearly interest earned and a $1,519 decrease in income from
TCC, our former joint venture, which was dissolved in September 2008.
The overall annual effective tax rate for fiscal 2009 was 26.7% on $23,395 of income before income
taxes, compared to 39.2% on $152,407 of income before income taxes for fiscal 2008. The primary
reasons for this decrease in rate were (1) the benefit derived from recording Qualified Alternative
Fuel Motor Vehicle (QAFMV) credits for fiscal years ended 2007 and 2008 in the current year
provision and the current year 2009 QAFMV credits received (2) recording the benefit derived from
amending our federal and state income tax returns as a result of an IRS examination (3) the
benefit of changes in legislation relative to our fiscal year 2008 research and development credit
and (4) adjustments to our income taxes payable as a result of entries to correct the Companys
prior year deferred taxes and state tax expense. The income tax payable adjustments are for FASB
Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48) deferred tax assets, accrued dealer incentives, and an adjustment
for the difference between state income tax expense accrued vs. paid.
The changes in costs and price within the Companys business due to inflation were not
significantly different from inflation in the United States economy as a whole. Levels of capital
investment, pricing and inventory investment were not materially affected by changes caused by
inflation.
26
SEGMENT REPORTING
Towable Recreation Vehicles
Analysis of Change in Net Sales for Fiscal 2009 vs. Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Change |
|
NET SALES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Travel Trailers |
|
$ |
489,637 |
|
|
|
51.3 |
|
|
$ |
864,796 |
|
|
|
49.0 |
|
|
$ |
(375,159 |
) |
|
|
(43.4 |
) |
Fifth Wheels |
|
|
425,826 |
|
|
|
44.7 |
|
|
|
839,168 |
|
|
|
47.6 |
|
|
|
(413,342 |
) |
|
|
(49.3 |
) |
Other |
|
|
37,816 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
59,135 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
(21,319 |
) |
|
|
(36.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Towables |
|
$ |
953,279 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,763,099 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
(809,820 |
) |
|
|
(45.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
|
Shipments |
|
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
|
Shipments |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Change |
|
# OF UNITS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Travel Trailers |
|
|
28,292 |
|
|
|
65.4 |
|
|
|
48,855 |
|
|
|
61.9 |
|
|
|
(20,563 |
) |
|
|
(42.1 |
) |
Fifth Wheels |
|
|
13,823 |
|
|
|
31.9 |
|
|
|
28,169 |
|
|
|
35.7 |
|
|
|
(14,346 |
) |
|
|
(50.9 |
) |
Other |
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
1,864 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
(679 |
) |
|
|
(36.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Towables |
|
|
43,300 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
78,888 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
(35,588 |
) |
|
|
(45.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
Increase /(Decrease) |
IMPACT OF CHANGE IN PRICE ON NET SALES: |
|
|
|
|
Towables |
|
|
|
|
Travel
Trailers |
|
|
(1.3 |
)% |
Fifth Wheels |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
Other |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
Total Towables |
|
|
(0.8 |
)% |
The decrease in towable net sales of 45.9% resulted primarily from a 45.1% decrease in unit
shipments and a 0.8% decrease in the impact of the change in the net price per unit. The overall
industry decrease in wholesale unit shipments of towables for August 2008 through July 2009 was
51.2%, according to statistics published by the RVIA.
The impact of the change in net price per unit of towables was a decrease of 0.8%, which included
a decrease in travel trailers of 1.3% and an increase in fifth wheels of 1.6%, in fiscal year 2009
as compared to fiscal year 2008. The primary reason for the decrease or nominal increase in the
change in the net price per unit is due to heavier discounting and increased incentives in fiscal
2009 necessitated by prevailing depressed market conditions. This decrease created by discounting
was offset, to varying degrees, by continued consumer demands for additional features or upgrades.
Cost of products sold decreased $674,790 to $841,804, or 88.3% of towable net sales, for fiscal
2009 compared to $1,516,594, or 86.0% of towable net sales, for fiscal 2008. The change in
material, labor, freight-out and warranty comprised $626,299 of the $674,790 decrease in cost of
products sold and was due to decreased sales volume. In addition, in fiscal 2008 cost of products
sold included an impairment and other charges of $5,711, of which $5,411 related to the sale of our
Thor California subsidiary and $300 related to the write-down of certain properties to fair value.
Material, labor, freight-out and warranty as a percentage of net sales increased to 79.8% from
78.7% from fiscal 2008 to 2009. The 1.1% increase as a percentage of net sales is due primarily to
the additional discounting in fiscal 2009. These costs in relation to gross sales remained
consistent with fiscal 2008. Manufacturing overhead decreased $42,780 to $80,837 in fiscal 2009
compared to $123,617 in fiscal 2008. Variable costs in manufacturing overhead decreased $41,493 to
$68,679, or 7.2% of towable net sales, for fiscal 2009 compared to $110,172, or 6.2% of towable net
sales, for fiscal 2008 due to lower production. Fixed costs in manufacturing overhead, which
consist primarily of facility costs and property taxes, decreased $1,287 to $12,158 in fiscal 2009
from $13,445 in fiscal 2008.
27
Towable gross profit decreased $135,030 to $111,475, or 11.7% of towable net sales, for fiscal 2009
compared to $246,505, or 14.0% of towable net sales, for fiscal 2008. The decrease in gross profit
was due primarily to the 45.1% decrease in unit sales volume and the additional discounting during
fiscal 2009.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $64,441, or 6.8% of towable net sales, for fiscal
2009 compared to $102,356, or 5.8% of towable net sales, for fiscal 2008. The primary reason for
the $37,915 decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was decreased net sales, which
caused related commissions, bonuses and other compensation to decrease by $32,385. In addition,
advertising and selling related costs decreased $2,708 due to decreased sales activity and legal
and settlement costs decreased $1,604 due to the resolution of various legal and product disputes.
Towable income before income taxes decreased to 5.0% of towable net sales for fiscal 2009 from 8.3%
of towable net sales for fiscal 2008. The primary factor for this decrease was the reduction in
unit sales coupled with additional discounting.
Motorized Recreation Vehicles
Analysis of Change in Net Sales for Fiscal 2009 vs. Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Change |
|
NET SALES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Motorized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A |
|
$ |
89,477 |
|
|
|
55.3 |
|
|
$ |
306,577 |
|
|
|
66.4 |
|
|
$ |
(217,100 |
) |
|
|
(70.8 |
) |
Class C |
|
|
62,789 |
|
|
|
38.8 |
|
|
|
152,134 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
|
|
|
(89,345 |
) |
|
|
(58.7 |
) |
Other |
|
|
9,461 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
3,145 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
6,316 |
|
|
|
200.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Motorized |
|
$ |
161,727 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
461,856 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
(300,129 |
) |
|
|
(65.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
|
Shipments |
|
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
|
Shipments |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# OF UNITS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Motorized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A |
|
|
913 |
|
|
|
42.2 |
|
|
|
3,192 |
|
|
|
54.4 |
|
|
|
(2,279 |
) |
|
|
(71.4 |
) |
Class C |
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
52.2 |
|
|
|
2,631 |
|
|
|
44.9 |
|
|
|
(1,500 |
) |
|
|
(57.0 |
) |
Other |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
202.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Motorized |
|
|
2,165 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
5,863 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
(3,698 |
) |
|
|
(63.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
Increase/(Decrease) |
IMPACT OF CHANGE IN PRICE ON NET SALES: |
|
|
|
|
Motorized |
|
|
|
|
Class A |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
Class C |
|
|
(1.7 |
)% |
Other |
|
|
(1.7 |
)% |
Total Motorized |
|
|
(1.9 |
)% |
The decrease in motorized net sales of 65.0% resulted primarily from a 63.1% decrease in unit
shipments and the impact of a 1.9% decrease in the impact of the change in net price per unit. The
overall industry decrease in wholesale unit shipments of motorhomes for the period August 2008
through July 2009 was 70.2% according to statistics published by the RVIA.
The impact of the change in the net price per unit of motorized was a decrease of 1.9%, which
included increases in Class A motorized units of 0.6%, and decreases in Class C motorized units of
1.7% in fiscal year 2009 as compared to fiscal year 2008. The nominal increase or decrease in the
impact in net price per unit is attributable to much greater discounting and increased wholesale
and retail incentives in fiscal 2009 in response to the significant contraction within the
motorized market. The negative effects of the increase in discounting was offset in the Class A
segment by the continued increase in the concentration of diesel units within the Class A line
(30.9% in 2009 and 25.7% in 2008). Diesel units are generally larger and more expensive than gas
units.
28
Cost of products sold decreased $264,473 to $161,455, or 99.8% of motorized net sales, for fiscal
2009 compared to $425,928, or 92.2% of motorized net sales, for fiscal 2008. The change in
material, labor, freight-out and warranty comprised $252,347 of the $264,473 decrease in cost of
products sold and was due to decreased sales volume. In addition, in fiscal 2008 cost of products
sold includes charges of $1,526 related to the write-down of certain properties to fair value.
Material, labor, freight-out and warranty as a percentage of net sales increased to 87.4% from
85.2% from fiscal 2008 to 2009. This 2.2% increase as a percentage of net sales was primarily
driven by the deep discounting done in fiscal 2009 to remain competitive in the difficult motorized
market segment. Labor, freight-out and warranty costs in relation to gross sales remained
consistent with fiscal 2008. Material costs in relation to gross sales decreased by 1.0% in fiscal
2009 primarily due to the favorable impact of the LIFO inventory liquidations of $4,430.
Manufacturing overhead decreased $10,600 to $20,083 in fiscal 2009 compared to $30,683 in fiscal
2008. Variable costs in manufacturing overhead decreased $10,889 to $15,920, or 9.8% of motorized
net sales, for fiscal 2009 compared to $26,809, or 5.8% of motorized net sales, for fiscal 2008 due
to lower production. Fixed costs in manufacturing overhead, which consist primarily of facility
costs and property taxes, increased $289 to $4,163 from $3,874 in fiscal 2008.
Motorized gross profit decreased $35,656 to $272, or 0.2% of motorized net sales, for fiscal 2009
compared to $35,928, or 7.8% of motorized net sales, for fiscal 2008. The decrease in gross profit
was due primarily to the 63.1% decrease in unit sales volume and additional discounting.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $19,695, or 12.2% of motorized net sales, for
fiscal 2009 compared to $28,899, or 6.3% of motorized net sales, for fiscal 2008. The primary
reason for the $9,204 decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was decreased net
sales which caused related commissions, bonuses and other compensation to decrease by $7,681. In
addition, self-insurance costs decreased $2,650 due to the settlement in fiscal 2008 of a single
self insurance product liability claim, and advertising and selling costs decreased $1,013 due to
decreased sales activity. These decreases were offset by increases of $955 for legal and settlement
costs due to increases in various legal and product disputes and increased costs of $1,537 related
to vehicle repurchase activity.
Motorized income before income taxes was a negative 18.4% of net sales for fiscal 2009 and a
negative 0.1% of net sales for fiscal 2008. This reflects the impact of the decrease in unit sales,
increased discounting, and the related impact on gross profit, and goodwill and trademark
impairments of $9,717 and $564, respectively, at two of our motorized subsidiaries.
Buses
Analysis of Change in Net Sales for Fiscal 2009 vs. Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
406,890 |
|
|
$ |
415,725 |
|
|
$ |
(8,835 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
# of Units |
|
|
6,145 |
|
|
|
6,280 |
|
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
Impact of Change in Price on Net Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
The decrease in buses net sales of 2.1% resulted from a 2.1% decrease in unit shipments.
There was no impact of the change in the price per unit of buses in fiscal year 2009 as compared to
fiscal year 2008 as modest selling price increases were offset by similar nominal increases in
discounting.
Cost of products sold decreased $9,632 to $366,100, or 90.0% of net sales, for fiscal 2009 compared
to $375,732, or 90.4% of buses net sales, for fiscal 2008. The decrease in material, labor,
freight-out and warranty represents $9,982 of the $9,632 decrease in cost of products sold offset
by an increase of $350 in manufacturing overhead. Material, labor, freight-out and warranty as a
percentage of buses net sales decreased slightly to 82.4% from 83.1% from fiscal 2008 to 2009. The
individual relationships of labor, freight-out and warranty to buses net sales did not vary
significantly in fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008. Manufacturing overhead increased $350 to
$30,795 in fiscal 2009 compared to $30,445 in fiscal 2008. Variable costs in manufacturing overhead
increased $542 to $28,549, or 7.0% of buses net sales, for fiscal 2009 compared to $28,007, or 6.7%
of buses net sales, for fiscal 2008. Fixed costs in manufacturing overhead, which consist primarily
of facility costs and property taxes, decreased $192 to $2,246 in fiscal 2009 from $2,438 in fiscal
2008.
Buses gross profit increased $797 to $40,790, or 10.0% of buses net sales, for fiscal 2009 compared
to $39,993, or 9.6% of buses net sales, for fiscal 2008. The increase in gross profit resulted
primarily from the change in cost of products sold as discussed above.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $22,782, or 5.6% of buses net sales, for fiscal
2009 compared to $18,088, or 4.4% of net bus sales, for fiscal 2008. The primary reason for the
$4,694 increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was a $3,000 increase in self
insurance reserves related to a single product liability case. Additionally, legal and settlement
costs increased $1,270, a portion of which related to this same product liability case.
29
Buses income before income taxes decreased to 4.3% of buses net sales for 2009 from 5.1% of buses
net sales for fiscal 2008. This reflects the impact of the increase in selling, general and
administrative expenses, offset in part by the increase in gross profit, each as discussed above.
Financial Condition and Liquidity
As of July 31, 2010, we had $247,751 in cash and cash equivalents compared to $221,684 on July 31,
2009. The change is primarily due to the $100,652 provided by operations and $115,850 from the
liquidation of auction rate securities, partially offset by the purchase in the second quarter of
fiscal 2010 of shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $115,420, the payment
of cash dividends of $42,408 and $19,756 for our acquisition of SJC.
Working capital at July 31, 2010 was $345,006 compared to $419,544 at July 31, 2009. We have no
long-term debt. Capital expenditures of approximately $12,767 for the twelve months ended July 31,
2010 were made primarily to purchase land and buildings to expand our towable operations, replace
buildings and equipment at our Champion facility that were destroyed in the fire, upgrade IT
systems and replace machinery and equipment used in the ordinary course of business.
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities for fiscal 2010 was $100,652 compared to net cash
provided by operating activities of $48,570 for fiscal 2009. The combination of improved net income
resulting from higher sales and margins, and non-cash items (primarily depreciation, amortization,
and deferred income taxes) provided $121,973 of operating cash for fiscal 2010 compared to $47,555
in the prior year period. However, this was offset in part by increased receivables, inventories
and payables due to increased production and revenues. Floor plan lender approval and RV
transportation delays have both slowed our accounts receivable collection cycle. Inventories have
also increased in part due to accelerated procurement of certain chassis and higher raw material
balances to maintain the increased production rates.
Investing Activities
Net cash provided by investing activities of $82,977 for fiscal 2010 was primarily due to auction
rate securities (ARS) sales of $115,850 at par and $4,966 from the disposition of assets,
partially offset by a $10,000 note receivable transaction, $19,756 used to acquire a new operating
subsidiary (SJC), and $12,297 of capital expenditures. Of the capital expenditures, $4,008 was for
the purchase of land and buildings to expand our towable operations in Oregon. During fiscal 2009,
net cash used by investing activities of $307 was due to ARS redemptions of $10,850 at par, $2,890
of proceeds on disposition of assets and $1,578 of proceeds on dissolution of a joint venture,
offset by capital spending of $5,135 and a note receivable transaction of $10,000. See Note Q of
our consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this report for a description of the
note receivable transaction.
We anticipate capital expenditures in fiscal 2011 of approximately $23,000, as a result of the growth of our Company.
These expenditures are expected to be
financed from cash and cash equivalents and will be made primarily for
expanding our recreation vehicle facilities and replacing and upgrading machinery, equipment and
other assets to be used in the ordinary course of business.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities of $157,812 for fiscal 2010 was related to the repurchase of
3,980,000 shares of our common stock of the Company for $115,420 and for dividend payments of
$42,408. See Note J to our consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this report for
a description of the share repurchase transaction. We paid a regular quarterly $.07 per share
dividend in each quarter of fiscal 2010 and a special $.50 per share dividend in October 2009
totaling $42,408 for fiscal 2010. During fiscal 2009, net cash used in financing activities of
$15,496 was primarily for dividend payments of $15,523.
Critical Accounting Principles
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements
requires the use of estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the periods presented. We believe that of our accounting policies, the
following may involve a higher degree of judgment, estimates and complexity.
30
Impairment of Goodwill, Trademarks and Long-Lived Assets
At least annually we review the carrying value of goodwill and trademarks with indefinite useful
lives. Long-lived assets, identifiable intangibles that are amortized, goodwill and trademarks with
indefinite useful lives are also reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable from future cash
flows. This review is performed primarily using estimates of future cash flows. The market approach
is also used when appropriate. If the carrying value of a long-lived asset is considered impaired,
an impairment charge is recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the long-lived asset
exceeds its fair value. Management believes that the estimates of future cash flows and fair values
are reasonable; however, changes in estimates of such cash flows and fair values could affect the
evaluations.
Insurance Reserves
Generally, we are self-insured for workers compensation and group medical insurance. Under these
plans, liabilities are recognized for claims incurred, including those incurred but not reported.
The liability for workers compensation claims is determined by the Company with the assistance of
a third party administrator and actuary using various state statutes and historical claims
experience. Group medical reserves are estimated using historical claims experience. We have a
self-insured retention (SIR) for products liability and personal injury matters of $5,000 per
occurrence. We have established a reserve on our balance sheet for such occurrences based on
historical data and actuarial information. Amounts above the SIR, up to a certain dollar amount,
are covered by our excess insurance policy. We maintain excess liability insurance aggregating
$25,000 with outside insurance carriers to minimize our risks related to catastrophic claims in
excess of our self-insured positions for products liability and personal injury matters. Any
material change in the aforementioned factors could have an adverse impact on our operating
results.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2009, the self-insurance reserve was increased by $4,000 to
provide for our full $5,000 SIR related to an accident case arising out of our bus operations in
the normal course of business. Based upon advice from outside legal counsel, we concluded that it
was probable that settlement of the case would require us to pay an amount at least equal to the
SIR.
Product Warranty
We generally provide retail customers of our products with a one-year warranty covering defects in
material or workmanship, with longer warranties on certain structural components. We record a
liability based on our best estimate of the amounts necessary to settle future and existing claims
on products sold as of the balance sheet date. Factors we use in estimating the warranty liability
include a history of units sold, existing dealer inventory, average cost incurred and a profile of
the distribution of warranty expenditures over the warranty period. A significant increase in
dealer shop rates, the cost of parts or the frequency of claims could have a material adverse
impact on our operating results for the period or periods in which such claims or additional costs
materialize. Management believes that the warranty reserve is adequate; however actual claims
incurred could differ from estimates, requiring adjustments to the reserves. Warranty reserves are
reviewed and adjusted as necessary on a quarterly basis.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes under the provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes. The objectives of
accounting for income taxes are to recognize the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the
current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that
have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns. Judgment is required in assessing
the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax
returns. Fluctuations in the actual outcome of these tax consequences could materially impact our
financial position or results of operations.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2008, we adopted guidance surrounding accounting for uncertainty in
income taxes. As a result of the implementation of this guidance, we recognize liabilities for
uncertain tax positions based on a two-step process. The first step is to evaluate the tax position
for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely
than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or
litigation processes, if any. The second step requires us to estimate and measure the tax benefit
as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement. It is
inherently difficult and subjective to estimate such amounts, as we have to determine the
probability of various possible outcomes. We reevaluate these uncertain tax positions on a
quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on factors including, but not limited to, changes in
facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, effectively settled issues under audit, and new audit
activity. Such a change in recognition or measurement would result in the recognition of a tax
benefit or an additional charge to the tax provision.
Significant judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax
and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our deferred tax assets, if any.
Valuation allowances must be considered due to uncertainty of realizing deferred tax assets. ASC
740-10 requires that companies assess whether valuation allowances should be established against
their deferred tax asset on a tax jurisdictional basis based on the consideration of all available
evidence, using a more likely than not standard. We have evaluated the
31
sustainability of our deferred tax assets on our consolidated balance sheet which includes the
assessment of the cumulative income over recent prior periods. Based on the provisions of ASC
740-10, we determined a valuation allowance was not required to be recorded against deferred income
tax assets in any of the tax jurisdictions in which we currently operate.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues from the sale of recreation vehicles and buses are recorded primarily when all of the
following conditions have been met:
1) An order for a product has been received from a dealer;
2) Written or oral approval for payment has been received from the dealers flooring institution;
3) A common carrier signs the delivery ticket accepting responsibility for the product as agent for
the dealer; and
4) The product is removed from our property for delivery to the dealer who placed the order.
Certain shipments are sold to customers on credit or cash on delivery (COD) terms. We recognize
revenue on credit sales upon shipment and COD sales upon payment and delivery. Most sales are made
by dealers financing their purchases under flooring arrangements with banks or finance companies.
Products are not sold on consignment, dealers do not have the right to return products, and dealers
are typically responsible for interest costs to floor plan lenders. On average, we receive payments
from floor plan lenders on products sold to dealers within 15 days of the invoice date.
Repurchase Commitments
We are contingently liable under terms of repurchase agreements with financial institutions
providing inventory financing for certain dealers of certain of our products. These arrangements,
which are customary in the industry, provide for the repurchase of products sold to dealers in the
event of default by the dealer. The repurchase price is generally determined by the original sales
price of the product and pre-defined curtailment arrangements and we typically resell the
repurchased product at a discount from its repurchase price. We account for the guarantee under our repurchase agreements
of our dealers financing by estimating and deferring a portion of the related product sale that
represents the estimated fair value of the repurchase obligation. This deferred amount is included in our
repurchase and guarantee reserve. Additionally, the repurchase and guarantee reserve includes our
estimated loss upon resale of expected repurchases. This estimate is based on recent historical
experience supplemented by managements assessment of current economic and other conditions
affecting its dealers.
Our risk of loss under these repurchase agreements is reduced because (a) we sell our products to a
large number of dealers under these arrangements, (b) the repurchase price we are obligated to pay
declines over the period of the agreements (generally up to eighteen months) while the value of the
related product may not decline ratably and (c) we have historically been able to readily resell
any repurchased product. We believe that any future losses under these agreements will not have a
significant effect on the Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Investments
We have an investment portfolio comprised of tax-exempt auction rate securities. The value of these
securities is subject to market volatility for the period we hold these investments and until their
sale or maturity. We recognize realized losses when declines in the fair value of our investments
below their cost basis are judged to be other-than-temporary. In determining whether a decline in
fair value is other-than-temporary, we consider various factors including market price (when
available), investment ratings, the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been
less than our cost basis, auction success and failure rates, and our intent and ability to hold the
investment until maturity or for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery
in market value. We make significant judgments in considering these factors. If it is judged that a
decline in fair value is other-than-temporary, the investment is valued at the current fair value
and a realized loss equal to the decline is reflected in net income which could materially
adversely affect our operating results.
32
Principal Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
Our principal contractual obligations and commercial commitments at July 31, 2010 are summarized in
the following charts. We have no other off balance sheet commitments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due By Period |
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total |
|
|
Fiscal 2011 |
|
|
Fiscal 2012-2013 |
|
|
Fiscal 2014-2015 |
|
|
After 5 Years |
|
Operating leases and other |
|
$ |
2,987 |
|
|
$ |
1,655 |
|
|
$ |
1,189 |
|
|
$ |
143 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Consigned Inventory |
|
|
21,583 |
|
|
|
21,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits (1) |
|
|
1,618 |
|
|
|
1,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations |
|
$ |
26,188 |
|
|
$ |
24,856 |
|
|
$ |
1,189 |
|
|
$ |
143 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We have included in unrecognized tax benefits approximately $1,618 for payments expected to
be made in fiscal 2011. Unrecognized tax benefits in the amount of approximately $42,747 have
been excluded from the table because we are unable to determine a reasonably reliable estimate
of the timing of future payment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period |
|
|
|
Amounts |
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Commercial Commitments |
|
Committed |
|
|
One Year (1) |
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
4-5 Years |
|
|
Over 5 Years |
|
Guarantees |
|
$ |
1,524 |
|
|
$ |
1,524 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Standby repurchase obligations |
|
|
563,636 |
|
|
|
306,925 |
|
|
|
256,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial commitments |
|
$ |
565,160 |
|
|
$ |
308,449 |
|
|
$ |
256,711 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The standby repurchase obligations generally extend up to eighteen months from the date of sale of the related product to the dealer. In estimating the expiration of the standby repurchase obligations, we used inventory reports
as of July 31, 2010 from our dealers lending institutions and made an assumption for obligations for inventory
aged 0-12 months that it was financed evenly over the twelve month period. |
Accounting Pronouncements
Reference is made to Note A to our consolidated financial statements contained in this report for a
summary of our recently adopted accounting pronouncements.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
None
33
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA SEE ITEM 15
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31 |
|
|
January 31 |
|
|
April 30 (1) |
|
|
July 31 |
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
502,552 |
|
|
$ |
430,025 |
|
|
$ |
680,192 |
|
|
$ |
663,788 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
69,771 |
|
|
|
49,996 |
|
|
|
92,499 |
|
|
|
94,820 |
|
Net income |
|
|
23,429 |
|
|
|
11,924 |
|
|
|
34,111 |
|
|
|
40,600 |
|
Earnings per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.66 |
|
|
|
0.78 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.66 |
|
|
|
0.77 |
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
|
0.57 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
Dividends paid per common share |
|
|
0.57 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
Market prices per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$ |
32.98 |
|
|
$ |
33.87 |
|
|
$ |
36.85 |
|
|
$ |
36.47 |
|
Low |
|
$ |
23.90 |
|
|
$ |
26.05 |
|
|
$ |
30.00 |
|
|
$ |
20.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31 |
|
|
January 31 (2) |
|
|
April 30 (3)(4) |
|
|
July 31 (5)(6) |
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
438,817 |
|
|
$ |
226,683 |
|
|
$ |
415,472 |
|
|
$ |
440,924 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
40,063 |
|
|
|
8,157 |
|
|
|
46,447 |
|
|
|
57,870 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
5,120 |
|
|
|
(14,860 |
) |
|
|
2,102 |
|
|
|
24,781 |
|
Earnings (loss) per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
(0.27 |
) |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.45 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
(0.27 |
) |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.45 |
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
Dividends paid per common share |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
Market prices per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$ |
31.85 |
|
|
$ |
19.09 |
|
|
$ |
23.29 |
|
|
$ |
23.95 |
|
Low |
|
$ |
14.68 |
|
|
$ |
10.51 |
|
|
$ |
9.54 |
|
|
$ |
16.65 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The third quarter ended April 30, 2010 includes a non-cash trademark impairment of $500
for the trademark associated with a subsidiary within our towables segment. |
|
(2) |
|
The second quarter ended January 31, 2009 includes a non-cash trademark impairment of
$564 for the trademark associated with a subsidiary within our motorized segment. |
|
(3) |
|
The third quarter ended April 30, 2009 includes a non-cash goodwill impairment of
$9,717 for the goodwill associated with a subsidiary within our motorized segment. |
|
(4) |
|
The third quarter ended April 30, 2009 net income was overstated by $3,694, due to the
income taxes related to the $9,717 goodwill impairment charge taken in the third quarter.
The impairment charge was improperly treated as being deductible for tax purposes. The
Company corrected this error in the fourth quarter. |
|
(5) |
|
The fourth quarter ended July 31, 2009 net income was decreased by $673 due to the
correction of two out-of-period income tax errors. Net income was decreased by $3,694 due
to the third quarter error referred to in item (4) above. Net income was increased by
$3,021 due to adjustments to the Companys prior year accrual for income taxes payable. |
|
(6) |
|
The fourth quarter ended July 31, 2009 includes a liquidation of LIFO inventory layers,
which are carried at lower costs. The effect of these liquidations was to increase net
income in the fourth quarter of 2009 by approximately $4,300. It is the Companys policy to
record the earnings effect of LIFO inventory liquidations in the quarter in which a decrease
for the entire year becomes certain. |
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
34
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Part A Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under
Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e), that are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. In designing and
evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, the Companys management recognizes that any
controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable
assurance of achieving the desired control objectives and the Companys management necessarily is
required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and
procedures. The Company has carried out an evaluation, as of the end of the period covered by this
report, under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including its
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Companys disclosure controls
and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in
the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified by the SECs rules and forms and accumulated and
communicated to the Companys management as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
Part B Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Internal control over financial reporting
refers to a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America and includes those policies and procedures that: (i)
pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our
transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that our receipts and
expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and members of
our Board of Directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material
effect on our financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting cannot provide
absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives. Internal control over financial
reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in
judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting
also can be circumvented by collusion or improper override. Because of such limitations, there is a
risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal
control over financial reporting. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are also subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions
or that the degree of compliance with established policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Companys management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting as of July 31, 2010, using the criteria set forth in Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Based on its assessment, management believes that as of July 31, 2010, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
Our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, has issued an attestation
report on our internal control over financial reporting. The report appears in Part D of this Item
9A.
Part C Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010, there have been no material changes in our internal
control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
35
Part D Attestation Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Thor Industries, Inc.
Jackson Center, Ohio
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Thor Industries, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of July 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. The Companys management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, included in managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys internal control over financial reporting
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk,
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the
supervision of, the companys principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons
performing similar functions, and effected by the companys board of directors, management, and
other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes
those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the
possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to
error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any
evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods
are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over
financial reporting as of July 31, 2010, based on the criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year
ended July 31, 2010 and our report dated September 28, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion on
those financial statements.
/S/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Chicago, Illinois
September 28, 2010
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
36
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The Company has adopted a written code of ethics, the Thor Industries, Inc. Business Ethics
Policy which is applicable to all directors, officers and employees of the Company, including the
Companys principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or
controller and other executive officers identified pursuant to this Item 10 who perform similar
functions (collectively, the Selected Officers). In accordance with the rules and regulations of
the SEC, a copy of the code has been posted on the Companys website and is also available in print
to any person, without charge, upon request. The Company intends to disclose any changes in or
waivers from its code of ethics applicable to any Selected Officer on its website at
http://www.thorindustries.com or by filing a Form 8-K.
The other information in response to this Item is included under the captions BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, BOARD OF DIRECTORS, COMMITTEES AND ATTENDANCE AT MEETINGS and
SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE, in the Companys definitive Proxy
Statement to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A, which portion of said Proxy
Statement is hereby incorporated by reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required in response to this Item is contained under the captions EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION in the Companys definitive Proxy Statement to be
filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A, which portion of said Proxy Statement is hereby
incorporated by reference.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
No member of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is or was formerly an officer or
employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. During fiscal 2010, no executive officer of the
Company or any of its subsidiaries served on the compensation committee (or equivalent), or the
Board of Directors, of another entity whose executive officer(s) served on our Compensation
Committee or Board of Directors.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information as of July 31, 2010 about the Companys Common Stock that
is authorized for issuance under the Companys equity compensation plans, including the Thor
Industries, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2006 Plan) and the Thor Industries, Inc. 1999
Stock Option Plan (the 1999 Plan).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Number of securities remaining available for |
|
|
|
(a) Number of securities to |
|
|
(b) Weighted-average |
|
|
future issuance under |
|
|
|
be issued upon exercise of |
|
|
exercise price of |
|
|
equity compensation plans |
|
|
|
outstanding options, |
|
|
outstanding options, |
|
|
(excluding securities |
|
Plan Category |
|
warrants and rights |
|
|
warrants and rights |
|
|
reflected in column (a)) |
|
Equity compensation
plans approved by
security holders |
|
|
1,381,725 |
(1) |
|
$ |
30.20 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
(2) |
Equity compensation
plans not approved
by security holders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,381,725 |
|
|
$ |
30.20 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents shares underlying stock options granted pursuant to the 2006 Plan and the 1999
Plan. The 1999 Plan was frozen in 2006 upon the adoption of the 2006 Plan. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents shares remaining available for future issuance pursuant to the 2006 Plan. |
37
The other information required in response to this Item is contained under the captions OWNERSHIP
OF COMMON STOCK and SUMMARIES OF EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS in the Companys definitive Proxy
Statement, to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A, which portion of said Proxy
Statement is hereby incorporated by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required in response to this Item is contained under the captions CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND TRANSACTIONS WITH MANAGEMENT and BOARD OF DIRECTORS, COMMITTEES AND ATTENDANCE AT
MEETINGS in the Companys definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC pursuant to
Regulation 14A, which portion of said Proxy Statement is hereby incorporated by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required in response to this Item is contained under the caption INDEPENDENT
AUDITOR FEES in the Companys definitive Proxy Statement, to be filed with the Commission pursuant
to Regulation 14A, which portion of said Proxy Statement is hereby incorporated by reference.
38
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) (1) Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
F-1 |
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
F-7 |
(b) Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description |
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(a) of the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2001) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2
of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2004) |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
By-laws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(b) of the Companys Registration Statement No. 33-13827) |
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
First Amendment to the By-laws of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) of the Companys current report
on Form 8-K dated March 11, 2010) |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Form of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended July 31, 1987) |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Thor Industries, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-8 dated November 5, 1999) |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Thor Industries, Inc. Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-8 dated December 3, 1997) |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Thor Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated select Executive Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of
the Companys current report on Form 8-K dated December 15, 2008) |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Thor Industries, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2007) |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Thor Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the
Companys current Report on Form 8-K dated December 15, 2008) |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Thor Industries, Inc. 2008 Annual Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K dated December 15, 2008) |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Offer Letter of Christian G. Farman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form
8-K dated May 6, 2008) |
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Thor Industries, Inc. Form of Indemnification Agreement for executive officers and directors of the Company (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 6, 2008) |
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Thor Industries, Inc. Form of Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K dated May 6, 2008) |
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Thor Industries, Inc. Form of Restricted Stock Award Certificate and Restricted Stock Award Agreement for grants to
directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 6, 2008) |
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Thor Industries, Inc. Form of Restricted Stock Award Certificate and Restricted Stock Award Agreement for grants to
employees and consultants (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated
May 6, 2008) |
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Credit Agreement between the Company and Stephen Adams, in his individual capacity, and Stephen Adams and his successors,
as trustee under the Stephen Adams Living Trust, dated January 15, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 22, 2009) |
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Credit Agreement between the Company and Stephen Adams, in his individual capacity, and Stephen Adams and his successors,
as trustee under the Stephen Adams Living Trust, dated January 30, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 3, 2009) |
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Repurchase Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2009, between the Company and the Estate of Wade F. B. Thompson
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 17, 2009) |
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Credit Agreement between the Company and Marcus Lemonis, Stephen Adams, in his individual capacity, and Stephen Adams and
his successors, as trustee under the Stephen Adams Living Trust, dated as of December 22, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 22, 2009) |
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Amendment to Exclusivity Agreement between the Company, FreedomRoads Holding
Company, LLC, FreedomRoads, LLC and certain
subsidiaries of FreedomRoads, LLC, dated as of December 22, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 22, 2009) |
39
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description |
10.17
|
|
First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated January 15, 2009, between the Company and Stephen Adams, in his individual
capacity, and Stephen Adams and his successors, as trustee under the Stephen Adams Living Trust, dated December 22, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 22, 2009) |
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated January 30, 2009, between the Company and Stephen Adams, in his individual
capacity, and Stephen Adams and his successors, as trustee under the Stephen Adams Living Trust, dated December 22, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 22, 2009) |
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2010, by and among the Company, SJC Industries Corp. and Christopher J.
Graff (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 5, 2010) |
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
Non-Competition Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2010, by and between the Company and Christopher J. Graff (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 5, 2010) |
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
Stock Option Agreement between the Company and Ronald Fenech, dated April 28, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2010) |
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
Thor Industries, Inc. Business Ethics Policy |
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Company* |
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, dated September 28, 2010* |
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer filed pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer filed pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002** |
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002** |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith |
|
** |
|
Furnished herewith |
40
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
THOR INDUSTRIES, INC.
|
|
|
(Signed) |
/S/ Peter B. Orthwein
|
|
|
|
Peter B. Orthwein |
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Date: September 28, 2010
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Signed)
|
|
/S/ Christian G. Farman
|
|
|
|
(Signed)
|
|
/S/ Alan Siegel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christian G. Farman
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan Siegel |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Treasurer
and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer & Principal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: September 28, 2010 |
|
|
|
Date: September 28, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Signed)
|
|
/S/ William C. Tomson
|
|
|
|
(Signed)
|
|
/S/ Neil D. Chrisman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William C. Tomson
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neil D. Chrisman |
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: September 28, 2010 |
|
|
|
Date: September 28, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Signed)
|
|
/S/ Geoffrey A. Thompson
|
|
|
|
(Signed)
|
|
/S/ Jan H. Suwinski |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geoffrey A. Thompson
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan H. Suwinski |
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: September 28, 2010 |
|
|
|
Date: September 28, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Signed)
|
|
/S/ J. Allen Kosowsky |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Allen Kosowsky |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: September 28, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Thor Industries, Inc.
Jackson Center, Ohio
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Thor Industries, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of July 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements
of income, stockholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended July 31, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of Thor Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries at July 31, 2010 and 2009, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
July 31, 2010, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2010,
based on the criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated September 28, 2010
expressed an unqualified opinion on the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
/S/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Chicago, Illinois
September 28, 2010
F-1
Consolidated Balance Sheets, July 31, 2010 and 2009
(amounts in thousands except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
247,751 |
|
|
$ |
221,684 |
|
Investments-short term (Note A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,150 |
|
Accounts receivable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade, less allowance for doubtful accounts $422 in 2010 and $302 in 2009 (Note A) |
|
|
159,535 |
|
|
|
111,793 |
|
Other |
|
|
5,864 |
|
|
|
3,823 |
|
Inventories (Note D) |
|
|
142,680 |
|
|
|
105,278 |
|
Notes receivable (Note Q) |
|
|
2,364 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Deferred income taxes and other (Note F) |
|
|
43,576 |
|
|
|
44,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
601,770 |
|
|
|
604,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
20,757 |
|
|
|
20,310 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
133,890 |
|
|
|
134,161 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
72,562 |
|
|
|
69,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost |
|
|
227,209 |
|
|
|
224,037 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
88,029 |
|
|
|
81,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
|
139,180 |
|
|
|
142,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments Joint ventures (Note K) |
|
|
2,474 |
|
|
|
2,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term
investments (Note B) |
|
|
5,327 |
|
|
|
13,428 |
|
Goodwill (Note C) |
|
|
150,901 |
|
|
|
148,411 |
|
Dealer network, noncompete agreements and other intangibles Net (Note C) |
|
|
5,728 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
Trademarks (Note C) |
|
|
14,936 |
|
|
|
13,336 |
|
Long term notes receivable (Note Q) |
|
|
28,966 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Deferred income taxes and other (Note F) |
|
|
14,791 |
|
|
|
16,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
220,649 |
|
|
|
201,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
964,073 |
|
|
$ |
951,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
108,616 |
|
|
$ |
78,120 |
|
Accrued liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and related items |
|
|
30,346 |
|
|
|
22,548 |
|
Product warranties (Note M) |
|
|
51,467 |
|
|
|
41,717 |
|
Taxes (Note F) |
|
|
28,416 |
|
|
|
5,700 |
|
Promotions and rebates |
|
|
9,419 |
|
|
|
6,743 |
|
Product/property liability and related liabilities |
|
|
15,254 |
|
|
|
12,990 |
|
Other |
|
|
13,246 |
|
|
|
16,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
256,764 |
|
|
|
184,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
14,345 |
|
|
|
15,262 |
|
Unrecognized tax benefits |
|
|
35,686 |
|
|
|
46,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long term liabilities |
|
|
50,031 |
|
|
|
61,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent liabilities and commitments (Note I) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity (Note J): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stockauthorized 1,000,000 shares; none outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stockpar value of $.10 a share; authorized, 250,000,000 shares;
issued 57,318,849 shares at July 31, 2010 and 57,318,263 shares at July
31, 2009 |
|
|
5,732 |
|
|
|
5,732 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
95,770 |
|
|
|
94,367 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
745,204 |
|
|
|
677,548 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
|
(324 |
) |
|
|
1,070 |
|
Less treasury shares of 5,857,339 in 2010 and 1,877,339 in 2009, at cost |
|
|
(189,104 |
) |
|
|
(73,684 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
657,278 |
|
|
|
705,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
964,073 |
|
|
$ |
951,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended July 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(amounts in thousands except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,276,557 |
|
|
$ |
1,521,896 |
|
|
$ |
2,640,680 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
1,969,471 |
|
|
|
1,369,359 |
|
|
|
2,318,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
307,086 |
|
|
|
152,537 |
|
|
|
322,426 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
147,407 |
|
|
|
124,578 |
|
|
|
177,068 |
|
Impairment of goodwill and trademarks |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
10,281 |
|
|
|
7,535 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
813 |
|
Gain on sale of property |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
2,308 |
|
Gain on involuntary conversion (Note R) |
|
|
7,593 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
5,515 |
|
|
|
5,530 |
|
|
|
11,511 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
1,315 |
|
Other income |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
2,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
171,393 |
|
|
|
23,395 |
|
|
|
152,407 |
|
Income taxes (Note F) |
|
|
61,329 |
|
|
|
6,252 |
|
|
|
59,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
110,064 |
|
|
$ |
17,143 |
|
|
$ |
92,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share (Note A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
2.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
1.67 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
2.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended July 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income |
|
July 31, 2007 |
|
|
1,441,600 |
|
|
$ |
(60,123 |
) |
|
|
57,222,404 |
|
|
$ |
5,722 |
|
|
$ |
90,247 |
|
|
$ |
2,756 |
|
|
$ |
727,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,706 |
|
|
$ |
92,706 |
|
Shares purchased |
|
|
435,739 |
|
|
|
(13,561 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,859 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
2,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends $2.28 per
common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(127,278 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Adoption of FIN48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,229 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized depreciation on
investments, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,810 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,810 |
) |
Foreign currency
translation
adjustment, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(909 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(909 |
) |
Compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2008 |
|
|
1,877,339 |
|
|
|
(73,684 |
) |
|
|
57,317,263 |
|
|
|
5,732 |
|
|
|
93,683 |
|
|
|
(1,963 |
) |
|
|
675,928 |
|
|
$ |
87,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,143 |
|
|
$ |
17,143 |
|
Stock option activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends $.28 per
common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,523 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized appreciation on
investments, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,118 |
|
Foreign currency
translation
adjustment, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
Compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,877,339 |
|
|
|
(73,684 |
) |
|
|
57,318,263 |
|
|
|
5,732 |
|
|
|
94,367 |
|
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
677,548 |
|
|
$ |
20,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,064 |
|
|
$ |
110,064 |
|
Shares purchased |
|
|
3,980,000 |
|
|
|
(115,420 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends $.78 per
common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,408 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized appreciation on
investments, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
368 |
|
Foreign currency
translation
adjustment, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,762 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,762 |
) |
Compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2010 |
|
|
5,857,339 |
|
|
$ |
(189,104 |
) |
|
|
57,318,849 |
|
|
$ |
5,732 |
|
|
$ |
95,770 |
|
|
$ |
(324 |
) |
|
$ |
745,204 |
|
|
$ |
108,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended July 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
110,064 |
|
|
$ |
17,143 |
|
|
$ |
92,706 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
12,719 |
|
|
|
13,007 |
|
|
|
16,208 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
813 |
|
Goodwill and trademark impairment |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
10,281 |
|
|
|
7,535 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(3,459 |
) |
|
|
6,411 |
|
|
|
(31,791 |
) |
(Gain)/loss on disposition of property, plant & equipment |
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
(2,365 |
) |
Stock based compensation |
|
|
1,387 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
Gain on involuntary conversion of assets |
|
|
(3,216 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on divestiture of Citair |
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities (excluding acquisition): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(49,184 |
) |
|
|
30,739 |
|
|
|
31,040 |
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
1,884 |
|
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
(29,987 |
) |
|
|
47,304 |
|
|
|
16,398 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
3,283 |
|
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
382 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
25,238 |
|
|
|
(17,548 |
) |
|
|
(27,615 |
) |
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
42,005 |
|
|
|
(45,051 |
) |
|
|
10,595 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
(11,667 |
) |
|
|
(3,829 |
) |
|
|
7,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
100,652 |
|
|
|
48,570 |
|
|
|
122,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant & equipment |
|
|
(12,297 |
) |
|
|
(5,625 |
) |
|
|
(14,475 |
) |
Proceeds from disposition of property, plant & equipment |
|
|
4,966 |
|
|
|
2,890 |
|
|
|
5,016 |
|
Purchase of available-for-sale investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66,650 |
) |
Proceeds from disposition of investments |
|
|
115,850 |
|
|
|
10,850 |
|
|
|
108,675 |
|
Proceeds on dissolution of joint venture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Insurance proceeds from involuntary conversion of assets |
|
|
4,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of SJC |
|
|
(19,756 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
82,977 |
|
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
32,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends |
|
|
(42,408 |
) |
|
|
(15,523 |
) |
|
|
(127,278 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(115,420 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,561 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
3,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(157,812 |
) |
|
|
(15,496 |
) |
|
|
(137,749 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
(703 |
) |
|
|
806 |
|
Net increase in cash and equivalents |
|
|
26,067 |
|
|
|
32,064 |
|
|
|
17,731 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
221,684 |
|
|
|
189,620 |
|
|
|
171,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
|
$ |
247,751 |
|
|
$ |
221,684 |
|
|
$ |
189,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
54,206 |
|
|
$ |
23,622 |
|
|
$ |
73,076 |
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
395 |
|
|
$ |
525 |
|
|
$ |
1,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures in accounts payable |
|
$ |
523 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
543 |
|
Deferred taxes, net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
562 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years Ended July 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(All amounts presented in thousands except share and per share data)
A. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Operations - Thor Industries, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the Company) was
founded in 1980 and manufactures a wide range of recreation vehicles and small and mid-size buses
at various manufacturing facilities across the United States. These products are sold to
independent dealers and municipalities primarily throughout the United States and Canada.
The Companys core business activities are comprised of three distinct operations, which include
the design, manufacture and sale of motorized recreation vehicles, towable recreation vehicles and
buses. Accordingly, the Company has presented segmented financial information for these three
segments at Note L of the Companys Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Principles of Consolidation The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Thor Industries, Inc. and its wholly-owned domestic and foreign subsidiaries
(collectively, the Company). All intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated upon
consolidation.
Cash and Cash Equivalents Interest-bearing deposits and other investments with maturities of
three months or less when purchased are considered cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents of
$162,888 are held by one financial institution. The remaining $84,863 is held at various other
financial institutions.
Investments The Company classifies investments as available-for-sale or trading.
Fair Value of Financial Investments The carrying amount of cash equivalents, investments,
accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the relatively short
maturity of these financial instruments.
Inventories Substantially all inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, determined
on the last-in, first-out (LIFO) basis. Manufacturing costs include materials, labor, freight-out
and manufacturing overhead. Unallocated overhead and abnormal costs are expensed as incurred.
Depreciation Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
Buildings and improvements 10 to 39 years
Machinery and equipment 3 to 10 years
Depreciation expense is recorded in cost of products sold except for $2,545, $1,728, and $1,350 in
fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which is recorded in selling, general and administrative
expenses.
Other Assets Other assets consist of goodwill, trademarks, dealer network, non-compete agreements and long-term
investments. Dealer network and non-compete agreements are amortized using the straight-line method over 5 to 14
years. Goodwill and trademarks are not amortized but are tested at least annually for impairment.
Trademarks are not amortized because they have indefinite useful lives.
Long-lived Assets Long-lived assets and identifiable intangibles that are amortized are reviewed
for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset may not be recoverable from future cash flows. If the carrying value of a long-lived asset is
impaired, an impairment charge is recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the
long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. The Company assesses the potential impairment of
long-lived assets in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 360-10. Management
assessed the fair value of certain properties which will no longer be used for operational or
administrative purposes and are being listed for sale or lease and marketed as such in the Elkhart,
Indiana area. Given the decline of the real estate market in 2008, the fair value of such
properties
had indicated an impairment of $1,962, which the Company recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2008, of which $1,826 is reported in cost of products sold and $136 is reported in selling, general
and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Income. Of this impairment, $1,662 is
reported under the motorized recreation vehicles segment and $300 is reported under the towable
recreation vehicles segment.
Product Warranties Estimated warranty costs are provided at the time of sale of the warranted
products. Warranty reserves are reviewed and adjusted as necessary on a quarterly basis.
F-7
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts A summary of bad debt activity is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
July 31, 2010 |
|
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
|
July 31, 2008 |
|
Beginning Balance |
|
$ |
302 |
|
|
$ |
295 |
|
|
$ |
122 |
|
Charged to expense |
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
Write-offs net of recoveries/payments |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(319 |
) |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance |
|
$ |
422 |
|
|
$ |
302 |
|
|
$ |
295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance Reserves Generally, we are self-insured for workers compensation and group medical
insurance. Under these plans, liabilities are recognized for claims incurred, including those
incurred but not reported, and changes in the reserves. The liability for workers compensation
claims is determined by the Company with the assistance of a third party administrator and actuary
using various state statutes and reserve requirements and historical claims experience. Group
medical reserves are estimated using historical claims experience. We have a self-insured retention
for products liability and personal injury matters of $5,000 per occurrence. We have established a
reserve on our balance sheet for such occurrences based on historical data and actuarial
information. We maintain excess liability insurance aggregating $25,000 with outside insurance
carriers to minimize our risks related to catastrophic claims in excess of all our self-insured
positions.
Revenue
Recognition Revenues from the sale of recreation vehicles and buses are recognized when
title passes, which is when shipped to dealers, distributors, or contract buyers in accordance with
shipping terms, which are primarily FOB shipping point.
Revenues from the sale of recreation vehicles and buses are recorded when all of the following
conditions have been met:
1) An order for a product has been received from a dealer;
2) Written or oral approval for payment has been received from the dealers flooring institution;
3) A common carrier signs the delivery ticket accepting responsibility for the product as agent for
the dealer; and
4) The product is removed from the Companys property for delivery to the dealer who placed the
order.
Certain shipments are sold to customers on credit or cash on delivery (COD) terms. The Company
recognizes revenue on credit sales upon shipment and COD sales upon payment and delivery. Most
sales are made by dealers financing their purchases under flooring arrangements with banks or
finance companies. Products are not sold on consignment, dealers do not have the right to return
products, and dealers are typically responsible for interest costs to floor plan lenders. On
average, the Company receives payments from floor plan lenders on products sold to dealers within
15 days of the invoice date.
Amounts billed to dealers for delivery of product are recognized as revenue with the corresponding
delivery expense charged to costs of products sold.
Dealer
Volume Rebates, Sales Incentives and Advertising Costs Estimated costs related to dealer
volume rebates and sales incentives are accrued as a reduction of revenue at the later of the time
products are sold or
the date the rebate or incentive is offered. Advertising costs, which consist primarily of
tradeshows, were $5,377, $5,770, and $8,139, in fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Repurchase Agreements The Company is contingently liable under terms of repurchase agreements
with financial institutions providing inventory financing for certain dealers of certain of its
products. These arrangements, which are customary in the industry, provide for the repurchase of
products sold to dealers in the event of default by the dealer. The risk of loss from these
agreements is spread over numerous dealers. The repurchase price is generally determined by the
original sales price of the product and pre-defined curtailment arrangements and the Company
typically resells the repurchased product at a discount from its repurchase price. The Company
accounts for the guarantee under its repurchase agreements of its dealers financing by estimating and deferring a portion of the
related product sale that represents the estimated fair value of the repurchase obligation. This deferred
amount is included in the Companys repurchase and guarantee reserve. Additionally, the repurchase
and guarantee reserve includes the Companys estimated loss upon resale of expected repurchases.
This estimate is based on recent historical experience supplemented by managements assessment of
current economic and other conditions affecting its dealers.
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Key estimates include
reserves for inventory, incurred but not reported medical claims, warranty claims, recalls, workers
compensation claims, vehicle repurchases, uncertain tax positions, product and non-product
litigation, fair value of auction rate securities and assumptions made in the annual goodwill
impairment
F-8
assessments. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various
other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The Company believes that such
estimates are made using consistent and appropriate methods. Actual results could differ from these
estimates.
Income
Taxes The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of ASC 740, Income
Taxes. The objectives of accounting for income taxes are to recognize the amount of taxes payable
or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax
consequences of events that have been recognized in the Companys financial statements or tax
returns. Judgment is required in assessing the future tax consequences of events that have been
recognized in the Companys financial statements or tax returns.
Foreign
Currency Assets and liabilities of the Companys Canadian operations reported in the
consolidated balance sheets have been translated at current exchange rates. Revenues and expenses
reported in the consolidated statements of income have been translated at the average exchange rate
for the year. Translation adjustments have been included in accumulated other comprehensive income.
Transaction gains and losses are not significant.
Stock
Options The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the grant date
fair value of its option grants. The fair value, and related compensation costs are recognized over
the option vesting period which is 3 to 5 years.
Earnings
Per Share Basic earnings per common share (EPS) is computed by dividing net income by
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net
income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding assuming dilution. The
difference between basic EPS and diluted EPS is the result of outstanding stock options and
restricted stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding for basic earnings per share |
|
|
53,019,008 |
|
|
|
55,429,373 |
|
|
|
55,593,572 |
|
Stock options and restricted stock |
|
|
100,356 |
|
|
|
47,097 |
|
|
|
138,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding assuming dilution |
|
|
53,119,364 |
|
|
|
55,476,470 |
|
|
|
55,731,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company excludes stock options that have an antidilutive effect from its calculation of
weighted average shares outstanding assuming dilution. At July 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company had stock options
outstanding of 784,000 and 404,061, respectively, that were excluded from this calculation.
Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS
167). SFAS No. 167 amends ASC 810-10 (formerly FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)) by adding previously
considered qualifying special purpose entities (the concept of these entities was eliminated by
SFAS No. 166). In addition, companies must perform an analysis to determine whether the Companys
variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest
entity. Companies must also reassess on an ongoing basis whether the Company is the primary
beneficiary of a variable interest entity. SFAS 167 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 167 to have a material impact on the
Companys financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASC) 2010-06 (Financial Reporting
Considerations Related to Fair Value Measurement Disclosures), which amends ASC 820 (formerly
Statement 157). The ASU was issued in response to requests from financial statement users for
additional information about fair value measurements. Under the ASU:
|
|
A reporting entity is now required to disclose separately the amounts of, and reasons for,
significant transfers (1) between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and (2) into
and out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy for the reconciliation of Level 3 measurements. |
|
|
|
A reporting entity is no longer permitted to adopt a policy recognizing transfers into
Level 3 as of the beginning of the reporting period and transfers out of Level 3 as of the end
of the reporting period. Rather, an entity must disclose and follow a consistent policy for
determining when transfers between levels are recognized. |
The Company adopted this ASU effective April 30, 2010. The adoption of the ASU did not have a
material impact on the financial statements.
B. INVESTMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value, establishes a framework
for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles and enhances disclosures
about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received
for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., an exit price) in the principal or most
advantageous market for the asset or
F-9
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.
Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and
minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard describes a fair value hierarchy based on
three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable,
that may be used to measure fair value which are the following:
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as
quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or
other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially
the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are
significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
The following table represents the Companys fair value hierarchy for its financial assets (cash
equivalents and investments) measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of July 31, 2010 and
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2010 |
|
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Cash and Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash |
|
|
Auction Rate Securities |
|
|
|
Equivalents |
|
|
Auction Rate Securities |
|
|
Equivalents |
|
|
and Put Rights |
|
Levels of Input |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
$ |
247,751 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
221,684 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
247,751 |
|
|
$ |
5,327 |
|
|
$ |
221,684 |
|
|
$ |
120,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys cash equivalents are comprised of money market funds traded in an active market with
no restrictions.
In addition to the above investments, the Company holds non-qualified retirement plan assets of
$7,499 at July 31, 2010 ($6,016 at July 31, 2009). These assets, which are held for the benefit of
certain employees of the Company, represent Level 1 investments primarily in mutual funds which are
valued using observable market prices in active markets. They are included in other assets on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Level 3 assets consist of bonds with an auction reset feature (auction rate securities or ARS)
whose underlying assets are primarily student loans which are substantially backed by the federal
government. Auction rate securities are long-term floating rate bonds tied to short-term interest
rates. After the initial issuance of the securities, the interest rate on the securities is reset
periodically, at intervals established at the time of issuance based on market demand for a reset
period. Auction rate securities are bought and sold in the marketplace through a competitive
bidding process often referred to as a Dutch auction. If there is insufficient interest in the
securities at the time of an auction, the auction may not be completed and the rates may be reset
to pre-determined penalty or maximum rates based on mathematical formulas in accordance with
each securitys prospectus.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the assets
measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 financial assets):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Balances at beginning of year |
|
$ |
120,578 |
|
|
$ |
126,403 |
|
Net change in other comprehensive income |
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
5,025 |
|
Net loss included in earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales/Maturities |
|
|
(115,850 |
) |
|
|
(10,850 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at end of year |
|
$ |
5,327 |
|
|
$ |
120,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction Rate Securities
At July 31, 2010, we held $5,850 (par value) of long-term investments comprised of tax-exempt ARS,
which are variable-rate debt securities and have a long-term maturity with the interest being reset
through Dutch auctions that are typically held every 7, 28 or 35 days. The securities have
historically traded at par and are callable at par at the option of the issuer. Interest is
typically paid at the end of each
F-10
auction period or semi-annually. At July 31, 2010, the majority of the ARS we held were AAA rated
or equivalent, and none were below A rated or equivalent, with most collateralized by student loans
substantially backed by the U.S. Federal government.
Since February 12, 2008, most auctions have failed for these securities and there is no assurance
that future auctions on the ARS in our investment portfolio will succeed and, as a result, our
ability to liquidate our investment and fully recover the par value of our investment in the near
term may be limited or not exist. An auction failure means that the parties wishing to sell
securities could not.
In November 2008, the Company elected to participate in a rights offering by UBS AG (UBS), a
Swiss bank which is one of the Companys investment providers, that provided the Company with the
right (the Put Rights) to sell to UBS at par value ARS purchased from UBS at any time during a
two-year sale period beginning June 30, 2010. We have sold $115,850 of ARS at par since August 1,
2009, and as of July 31, 2010 all our ARS held by UBS had been sold at par.
The Put Rights were not transferable or marginable. By electing to participate in the rights
offering the Company granted UBS the right, exercisable at any time prior to June 30, 2010 or
during the two-year sale period, to purchase or cause the sale of the Companys ARS (the Call
Right).
At July 31, 2010, there was insufficient observable ARS market information available to determine
the fair value of our ARS investments. Therefore, management, assisted by Houlihan, Smith &
Company, Inc., an independent consultant, determined an estimated fair value. In determining the
estimate, consideration was given to credit quality, final stated maturities, estimates on the
probability of the issue being called prior to final maturity, impact due to extended periods of
maximum auction rates and broker quotes. Based on this analysis, we recognized a total temporary
impairment of $523 ($324 total net of tax in other comprehensive income which is in the equity
section of the balance sheet) related to our long-term ARS investments of $5,850 (par value).
We have no reason to believe that any of the underlying issuers of our ARS are presently at risk of
default. Through July 31, 2010, we have continued to receive interest payments on the ARS in
accordance with their terms. We believe we will be able to liquidate our investments without
significant loss primarily due to the government guarantee of the underlying securities; however,
it could take until the final maturity of the underlying notes (up to 30 years) to realize our
investments par value. Based on the terms of the UBS Call Right, which was exercisable at any time
after June 30, 2010, effective June 30, 2009 the ARS held by UBS were classified as short-term.
The remaining ARS held by another institution remains classified as long-term at July 31, 2010.
Although there is uncertainty with regard to the short-term liquidity of these securities, the
Company continues to believe that the carrying amount represents the fair value of these marketable
securities because of the overall quality of the underlying investments and the anticipated future
market for such investments.
In addition, the Company has the intent and ability to hold these securities until the earlier of:
when the market for ARS stabilizes, the issuer refinances the underlying security, a buyer is found
outside of the auction process at acceptable terms or the underlying securities have matured.
C. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment by applying a
fair-value based test on an annual basis, or more frequently if circumstances indicate a potential
impairment. Intangible assets are comprised of non-compete agreements and various other intangibles
acquired through acquisitions.
The components of amortizable intangible assets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2010 |
|
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
Dealer network |
|
$ |
5,230 |
|
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Non-Compete agreements |
|
|
2,721 |
|
|
|
2,315 |
|
|
|
2,888 |
|
|
|
2,271 |
|
Other intangibles |
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortizable intangible assets |
|
$ |
8,221 |
|
|
$ |
2,493 |
|
|
$ |
2,888 |
|
|
$ |
2,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate amortization expense for amortizable intangibles for the years ended July 31, 2010, 2009
and 2008 were $510, $476 and $813, respectively. Dealer network, non-compete agreements and other
intangibles are amortized on a straight-line basis.
The weighted average remaining amortization period at July 31, 2010 is 12.4 years.
F-11
Estimated Amortization Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ending July 2011 |
|
$ |
689 |
|
For the fiscal year ending July 2012 |
|
$ |
509 |
|
For the fiscal year ending July 2013 |
|
$ |
452 |
|
For the fiscal year ending July 2014 |
|
$ |
452 |
|
For the fiscal year ending July 2015 and thereafter |
|
$ |
3,626 |
|
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not subject to amortization.
Management engages an independent valuation firm to assist in its impairment assessment reviews.
The value of all indefinite-lived trademarks was determined using a royalty savings methodology
similar to that employed when the associated businesses were acquired but using updated estimates
of sales, cash flow and profitability. The fair value of the Companys reporting units for purposes
of goodwill testing was determined primarily by employing a discounted cash flow methodology. The
market approach is also used when appropriate.
The Company completed an impairment review as of April 30, 2010 that resulted in a non-cash
trademark impairment of $500 in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 for the trademark associated with
an operating subsidiary in the towables segment. This impairment resulted from the sluggish market
and outlook for the park model business.
The Company completed an impairment review as of January 31, 2009 that resulted in a non-cash
trademark impairment of $564 in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 for the trademark associated with
an operating subsidiary in the motorized reportable segment. Another review was also conducted as
of April 30, 2009 which resulted in a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $9,717 in the third
quarter of fiscal 2009 for the goodwill associated with an operating subsidiary in the motorized
reportable segment. The impairments resulted from the difficult market environment and outlook for
the motorhome business. The Company completed an impairment review as of April 30, 2008 which
resulted in a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $7,535 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008
for the goodwill associated with an operating subsidiary in the motorized reportable segment.
The change in carrying value in goodwill and trademarks from July 31, 2009 to July 31, 2010 is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
Trademarks |
|
Balance at July 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
148,411 |
|
|
$ |
13,336 |
|
Impairment of trademark in towable reportable segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(500 |
) |
Amounts resulting from SJC acquisition in buses reportable segment |
|
|
2,490 |
|
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
150,901 |
|
|
$ |
14,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill as of July 31, 2010 and 2009 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Towables |
|
|
Motorized |
|
|
Buses |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Towables |
|
|
Motorized |
|
|
Buses |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of beginning of
fiscal year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
143,795 |
|
|
$ |
17,252 |
|
|
$ |
4,616 |
|
|
$ |
165,663 |
|
|
$ |
143,795 |
|
|
$ |
17,252 |
|
|
$ |
4,616 |
|
|
$ |
165,663 |
|
Accumulated impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,252 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,252 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,535 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,535 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Balance at beginning of
fiscal year |
|
$ |
143,795 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,616 |
|
|
$ |
148,411 |
|
|
$ |
143,795 |
|
|
$ |
9,717 |
|
|
$ |
4,616 |
|
|
$ |
158,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill acquired SJC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,490 |
|
|
|
2,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,717 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,717 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of end of fiscal year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
143,795 |
|
|
$ |
17,252 |
|
|
$ |
7,106 |
|
|
$ |
168,153 |
|
|
$ |
143,795 |
|
|
$ |
17,252 |
|
|
$ |
4,616 |
|
|
$ |
165,663 |
|
Accumulated impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,252 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,252 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,252 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,252 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Balance as of July 31: |
|
$ |
143,795 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,106 |
|
|
$ |
150,901 |
|
|
$ |
143,795 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,616 |
|
|
$ |
148,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-12
Goodwill and trademarks by segment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2010 |
|
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
Trademark |
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
Trademark |
|
Recreation Vehicles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towables |
|
$ |
143,795 |
|
|
$ |
9,737 |
|
|
$ |
143,795 |
|
|
$ |
10,237 |
|
Motorized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,036 |
|
Buses |
|
|
7,106 |
|
|
|
3,163 |
|
|
|
4,616 |
|
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
150,901 |
|
|
$ |
14,936 |
|
|
$ |
148,411 |
|
|
$ |
13,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. INVENTORIES
Major classifications of inventories are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Finished products |
|
$ |
9,681 |
|
|
$ |
6,682 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
46,681 |
|
|
|
38,159 |
|
Raw materials |
|
|
78,481 |
|
|
|
55,956 |
|
Chassis |
|
|
33,335 |
|
|
|
28,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
168,178 |
|
|
|
129,410 |
|
Excess of FIFO costs over LIFO costs |
|
|
(25,498 |
) |
|
|
(24,132 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
$ |
142,680 |
|
|
$ |
105,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During fiscal 2009 the amount of inventories in certain LIFO pools decreased which resulted in
liquidation of LIFO inventory layers, which are carried at lower costs. The effect of this
liquidation was to increase net income in fiscal 2009 by approximately $7,400. The impact of this
liquidation was approximately $2,730, $4,430 and $240 for the towables, motorized and buses
segments, respectively. It is the Companys policy to record the earnings effect of LIFO inventory
liquidations in the quarter in which a decrease for the entire year becomes certain. The Companys
reserve for inventory obsolescence decreased $1,517 to $1,536 at July 31, 2010 as a result of the
disposal of inventory in fiscal 2010 previously reserved at July 31, 2009 due to the discontinuance
of certain product lines.
E. LINE OF CREDIT
The Company had a $30,000 unsecured revolving line of credit which bore interest at prime less
2.15% and expired on November 30, 2008. The Company decided not to renew the unsecured revolving
line of credit and allowed it to expire on November 30, 2008. The decision not to renew the line of
credit was based on the Companys strong cash position combined with the Companys expectation that
it would have had the ability to borrow at favorable rates against
its ARS, if needed. As a result,
the Company did not anticipate utilizing the line of credit and did not want to incur the cost of
maintaining it.
F. INCOME TAXES
The components of the provision (benefit) for income taxes are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
Income Taxes: |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Federal |
|
$ |
55,462 |
|
|
$ |
(2,563 |
) |
|
$ |
79,263 |
|
State and local |
|
|
9,337 |
|
|
|
3,304 |
|
|
|
11,979 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(900 |
) |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current expense (benefit) |
|
|
64,788 |
|
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
91,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
(3,430 |
) |
|
|
6,163 |
|
|
|
(27,981 |
) |
State and local |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
(3,810 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred expense (benefit) |
|
|
(3,459 |
) |
|
|
6,411 |
|
|
|
(31,791 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense |
|
$ |
61,329 |
|
|
$ |
6,252 |
|
|
$ |
59,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Federal Tax Expense
Current federal tax expense increased $58,025 to $55,462 from 2009 to 2010. Of this amount, $51,800
was due to the increase in pre-tax income of $147,998. In addition, current federal tax expense
increased from 2009 to 2010 by $1,578 as a result of disallowed executive compensation deduction in
2010 and by $5,902 due to increases in various temporary items. Current federal tax expense
decreased by $3,325 as a result of the increased Domestic Manufacturing Deduction in 2010 and by
$3,027 due to a decrease in the
F-13
Companys unrecognized tax benefits, primarily related to lapses in the statute of limitations.
Further, current federal tax expense for 2010 decreased by $3,235 when compared to 2009 as a result
of the nondeductible goodwill charge in 2009. The other changes to current federal tax expense,
including temporary items, are detailed in the schedule below.
Current federal tax expense decreased $81,826 to $(2,563) from 2008 to 2009. Of this amount,
$45,154 was due to the reduction in pre-tax income of $129,012. Additionally, the Companys
decision to not insure warranty risk through its captive insurance company resulted in current
federal tax expense in 2009 being $21,280 less than in 2008. Also, current federal tax expense
decreased by $6,331 from 2008 because of the increased tax deduction for payments of warranty
claims. Further, credits and incentives, refunds from amended returns and tax exam settlements, and
reduction for excess accrued taxes payable further lowered 2009 current federal tax expense by
$5,552. Nondeductible goodwill increased 2009 current federal tax expense by $3,235. The other
changes to current federal tax expense, including temporary items, are detailed in the schedule
below.
Current State and Local Tax Expense
Current state tax expense increased $6,033 to $9,337 from 2009 to 2010. Of this amount, $6,956 was
due to the increase in pre-tax income of $147,998. In addition, current state tax expense increased
from 2009 to 2010 by $212 as a result of disallowed executive compensation in 2010, by $635 due to
increases in various temporary items, and by $1,096 due to an increase in the Companys
unrecognized tax benefits. Current state tax expense decreased by $472 when compared to 2009 as a
result of the nondeductible goodwill charge in 2009. The other changes to current state tax
expense, including temporary items, are detailed in the schedule below.
Current state tax expense decreased $8,675 to $3,304 from 2008 to 2009. Of this amount, $6,257 was
due to the reduction in pre-tax income of $129,012. Additionally, the Companys decision to not
insure warranty risk through its captive insurance company resulted in current state tax expense in
2009 being $3,810 less than in 2008. Also, current state tax expense decreased by $922 from 2008
because of the increased tax deduction for payments of warranty claims. The other changes to
current state tax expense, including temporary items, are detailed in the schedule below.
The table below shows the components of the total current income tax expense for fiscal 2010, 2009
and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Federal Tax Expense at Statutory Rates |
|
$ |
59,988 |
|
|
$ |
8,188 |
|
|
$ |
53,342 |
|
State Tax Expense at Various State Tax Rates (net of federal benefit) |
|
|
5,153 |
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
5,310 |
|
Current Tax Expense Effect of Accrued Product Warranties |
|
|
3,622 |
|
|
|
(7,253 |
) |
|
|
21,280 |
|
Current Tax Expense Effect of Other Temporary Items |
|
|
(407 |
) |
|
|
842 |
|
|
|
10,511 |
|
Income Tax Credits and Incentives |
|
|
(1,069 |
) |
|
|
(3,669 |
) |
|
|
(521 |
) |
Amended Returns and Tax Exam Settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,022 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Domestic Production Activities Deduction |
|
|
(3,745 |
) |
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
(4,099 |
) |
Executive Compensation Limitation |
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill Impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-Exempt Interest |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
(1,209 |
) |
Change in Uncertain Tax Positions |
|
|
(1,931 |
) |
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
5,572 |
|
True-up of Current Tax Payable |
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
(2,308 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other Permanent Items |
|
|
847 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
1,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Income Taxes |
|
$ |
64,788 |
|
|
$ |
(159 |
) |
|
$ |
91,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-14
The differences between income taxes at the federal statutory rate and the actual income taxes are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Provision at Federal Statutory Rate |
|
$ |
59,988 |
|
|
$ |
8,188 |
|
|
$ |
53,342 |
|
State and Local Income Taxes, Net of Federal Benefit |
|
|
5,124 |
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
5,310 |
|
Income Tax Credits and Incentives |
|
|
(1,069 |
) |
|
|
(3,669 |
) |
|
|
(521 |
) |
Amended Returns and Tax Exam Settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,022 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Domestic Production Activities Deduction |
|
|
(3,745 |
) |
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
(4,099 |
) |
Change in Uncertain Tax Positions |
|
|
(278 |
) |
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
5,572 |
|
Goodwill Impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Compensation Limitation |
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction of Excess Current Tax Payable and Deferred Tax Liabilities |
|
|
(1,061 |
) |
|
|
(2,308 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Tax-Exempt Interest |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
(1,209 |
) |
Other Permanent Items |
|
|
847 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
1,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes |
|
$ |
61,329 |
|
|
$ |
6,252 |
|
|
$ |
59,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
before income taxes includes foreign income (loss) of $(8,154),
$(2,659) and $(573) in
fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Companys foreign subsidiary was sold on April 30,
2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
A summary of deferred income taxes is as follows: |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Current deferred tax asset (liability): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory basis |
|
$ |
(715 |
) |
|
$ |
(96 |
) |
Employee benefits |
|
|
2,506 |
|
|
|
1,015 |
|
Self-insurance reserves |
|
|
10,077 |
|
|
|
9,657 |
|
Accrued Product warranties |
|
|
19,629 |
|
|
|
16,007 |
|
Accrued incentives |
|
|
2,538 |
|
|
|
1,490 |
|
Sales Returns and Allowances |
|
|
1,269 |
|
|
|
2,464 |
|
Settlement Fees |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
Unrecognized Tax Benefits |
|
|
2,406 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,648 |
|
|
|
1,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current net deferred tax asset included in deferred income taxes and other |
|
$ |
39,499 |
|
|
$ |
33,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term deferred tax asset (liability): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property basis |
|
|
(1,552 |
) |
|
|
(1,867 |
) |
Investments |
|
|
(1,529 |
) |
|
|
(486 |
) |
Deferred compensation |
|
|
3,719 |
|
|
|
3,559 |
|
Auction rate securities |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
Intangibles |
|
|
(5,436 |
) |
|
|
(5,205 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,097 |
) |
Unrecognized Tax Benefits |
|
|
11,795 |
|
|
|
15,512 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(720 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net long-term deferred tax asset (liability)
included in deferred income taxes and other
liabilities |
|
|
7,196 |
|
|
|
10,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset |
|
$ |
46,695 |
|
|
$ |
43,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys net deferred tax assets increased $3,227 to $46,695 from 2009 to 2010. Of this
increase, $3,622 was due to increased product warranty reserves and $1,491 was due to increased
employee benefits. This increase was offset by a $1,653 decrease in the deferred tax asset for
unrecognized tax benefits from 2009 to 2010. As of July 31, 2010, the Company had a $1,843 capital
loss carryover that it expects to realize.
The Companys net deferred tax assets increased $8,470 to $43,468 from 2008 to 2009. Of this
increase, $16,168 was due to reclassification of the deferred tax asset related to the liability
for unrecognized tax benefits discussed below. The deferred tax asset for unrecognized tax benefits
decreased due to changes in tax positions during 2009 by $314 to $15,854 of which $342 was current
and
F-15
$15,512 was long-term. Further, self-insurance reserves increased by $4,687. These increases were
offset in part by lower accrued liabilities of product warranties, $7,253, and incentives, $2,715.
As of July 31, 2009, the Company had a $2,532 capital loss carryover that it expects to realize.
Unrecognized Tax Benefits:
The Company adopted guidance surrounding accounting for uncertainty in income taxes on August 1,
2007. This guidance clarifies the accounting for uncertainties in income tax law by prescribing a
minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized for
financial accounting purposes. It also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement,
classification, interest and penalties, and disclosure. The amount of unrecognized tax benefits as
of July 31, 2010 totaled $31,039, of which $20,719 would increase income from continuing
operations, and thus impact the Companys effective tax rate, if ultimately recognized into income.
As of July 31, 2009, the Company corrected a misclassification in the presentation of the liability
for unrecognized tax benefits. The Company is no longer reporting the liability for unrecognized
tax benefits net of the related deferred income tax asset. Therefore, the liability for
unrecognized tax benefits and deferred tax assets have both been increased by $16,168 on the
Companys consolidated balance sheet. In the table below, the $11,031 reflects the increase in the
liability for unrecognized tax benefits due to the related deferred income tax asset, exclusive of
the deferred tax benefit for interest and penalties.
Changes in the unrecognized tax benefit during fiscal year 2010, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Unrecognized |
|
|
Unrecognized |
|
|
Unrecognized |
|
|
|
Tax
Benefit |
|
|
Tax
Benefit |
|
|
Tax
Benefit |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
30,235 |
|
|
$ |
21,032 |
|
|
$ |
19,463 |
|
Increase in liability due to federal benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax positions related to prior years: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
1,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions |
|
|
(1,883 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Tax positions related to current year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
|
4,095 |
|
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
3,805 |
|
Reductions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
(817 |
) |
|
|
(3,002 |
) |
|
|
(1,573 |
) |
Lapses in statute of limitations |
|
|
(1,351 |
) |
|
|
(1,328 |
) |
|
|
(656 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
31,039 |
|
|
$ |
30,235 |
|
|
$ |
21,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is the Companys policy to recognize interest and penalties accrued relative to
unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. Interest and penalties are not included in the
schedule above of unrecognized tax benefits. The total amount of liabilities accrued for
interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as of July 31, 2010, July 31, 2009,
as adjusted to correct the misclassification referred to above, and July 31, 2008, were
$13,326, $17,100, and $10,600, respectively. The total amount of interest and penalties
recognized in our consolidated statement of operations for July 31, 2010, July 31, 2009 and
July 31, 2008 were $(2,200), $1,320 and $4,039, respectively.
Generally, fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009 remain open for federal, state and foreign income
tax purposes. The Company and its corporate subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. federal
income tax return and multiple state income tax returns. The federal returns are subject to
examination by taxing authorities for all years after fiscal 2006. The Internal Revenue Service
audit for fiscal 2007 was completed during 2009. Additionally, the California state income tax
audit for fiscal 2003 through fiscal 2006 was settled during 2009. The Company is currently
being audited by the State of California for tax years July 31, 2007 and July 31, 2008. The
Company has reserved for this exposure in its liability for unrecognized tax benefits.
The Company anticipates a decrease of approximately $5,527 in unrecognized tax benefits, $1,880
in interest, and $1,272 in penalties, within the next 12 months from expected settlements or
payments of uncertain tax positions and lapses of the applicable statute of limitations. Actual
results may differ materially from this estimate.
F-16
G. LEASES
The Company has operating leases principally for land, buildings and equipment. Future minimum
rental payments required under these operating leases as of July 31, 2010 are $2,725 which includes
the following amount due in each of the next five fiscal years: $1,393 in fiscal 2011; $846 in
fiscal 2012; $343 in fiscal 2013; $91 in fiscal 2014 and $52 in fiscal 2015. Rent expense was
$2,139 in fiscal 2010, $3,838 in fiscal 2009 and $4,457 in fiscal 2008.
H. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Substantially all non-highly compensated domestic employees are eligible to participate in a 401(k)
plan. Company contributions are at the discretion of the Companys Board of Directors. Total
expense for the plan was $294 in fiscal 2010, $332 in fiscal 2009, and $597 in fiscal 2008.
The Company has established a deferred compensation plan for executives who do not participate in a
401(k) plan. This plan allows executives to defer a portion of their compensation and to direct the
Company to invest the funds in mutual fund investments held by the Company. Participant benefits
are limited to the value of the investments held on their behalf. Investments held by the Company
are accounted for at fair value and reported as other assets. The obligation to the participants is
reported as other liabilities. No net income or loss is recorded through the Consolidated
Statements of Income. The Company does not make contributions to the plan. The balance of
investments held in this plan was $7,499 at July 31, 2010 and $6,016 at July 31, 2009.
I. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND COMMITMENTS
The Company is contingently liable under terms of repurchase agreements with financial institutions
providing inventory financing for certain dealers of certain of its products. These arrangements,
which are customary in the industry, provide for the repurchase of products sold to dealers in the
event of default by the dealer. The repurchase price is generally determined by the original sales
price of the product and pre-defined curtailment arrangements and the Company typically resells the
repurchased product at a discount from its repurchase price. The risk of loss from these agreements
is spread over numerous dealers. In addition to the guarantee under these
repurchase agreements, the Company also provides limited guarantees to certain of its
dealers, most of which are expected to expire by December, 2010.
Our principal commercial commitments under repurchase agreements and guarantees at July 31, 2010
and July 31, 2009 are summarized in the following chart:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Amount |
|
|
Total Amount |
|
|
Term of |
Commitment |
|
Committed 2010 |
|
|
Committed 2009 |
|
|
Commitments |
Guarantee on dealer financing |
|
$ |
1,524 |
|
|
$ |
7,112 |
|
|
Various |
Standby repurchase
obligation on dealer
financing |
|
$ |
563,636 |
|
|
$ |
447,706 |
|
|
Up to eighteen months |
The repurchase agreement obligations generally extend up to eighteen months from the date of sale
of the related product to the dealer. The repurchase and guarantee reserve balances as of July 31,
2010 and 2009, which are included in other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets,
are $3,312 and $6,349, respectively, and include the deferred estimated fair value of the implied
guarantee under outstanding repurchase obligations and the estimated loss upon the eventual resale
of expected repurchased product. These reserves do not include any amounts for direct guarantees as
the Company does not currently expect any losses from such guarantees. The table below reflects
losses incurred under repurchase agreements for the past three fiscal years. The increased losses
in fiscal 2009 resulted from the more difficult market conditions in the recreation vehicle
business during that year. Management believes that any future losses under these agreements will
not have a significant effect on the Companys consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
Cost of units repurchased |
|
$ |
10,001 |
|
|
$ |
32,913 |
|
|
$ |
11,908 |
|
Realization of units resold |
|
|
8,665 |
|
|
|
27,652 |
|
|
|
10,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses due to repurchase |
|
$ |
1,336 |
|
|
$ |
5,261 |
|
|
$ |
1,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company obtains certain vehicle chassis from automobile manufacturers under converter pool
agreements. These agreements generally provide that the manufacturer will supply chassis at the
Companys various production facilities under the terms and conditions set forth in the agreement.
The manufacturer does not transfer the certificate of origin to the Company and, accordingly, the
Company accounts for the chassis as consigned, unrecorded inventory. Upon being put into
production, the Company becomes obligated to pay the
F-17
manufacturer for the chassis. Chassis are typically converted and delivered to customers within 90
days of delivery. If the chassis is not converted within 90 days of delivery to the Company, the
Company generally purchases the chassis and records the inventory. At July 31, 2010 chassis on hand
accounted for as consigned, unrecorded inventory was approximately $21,583. In addition to this
consigned inventory, at July 31, 2010 an additional $8,966 of
chassis provided by customers were located at the Companys production facilities pending further manufacturing. The Company never purchases these
chassis and does not include their cost in its billings to the customer for the completed unit.
The Company has been subject to an SEC review regarding the facts and
circumstances giving rise to the restatement of its previously issued financial statements as of July 31, 2006 and 2005,
and for each of the years in the three-year period ended July 31, 2006, and the financial results in each of the quarterly
periods in 2006 and 2005, and its financial statements as of and for the three months ended October 31, 2006 and related
matters. The Company has cooperated fully with the SEC, including from time to time responding to SEC staff requests for
additional information. The investigation by the SEC staff could result in the SEC seeking various penalties and
relief, including, without limitation, civil injunctive relief and/or civil monetary penalties
or administrative relief. The Company is currently discussing the terms of a possible settlement
of this matter with the SEC staff, however, there can be no assurances that a settlement will be reached.
The Company has been named in approximately 616 complaints, some of which were originally styled as
putative class actions (with respect to which class certification was ultimately denied) and some
of which were filed by individual plaintiffs, filed against manufacturers of travel trailers and
manufactured homes supplied to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for use as
emergency living accommodations in the wake of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. The complaints have
been transferred to the Eastern District of Louisiana by the federal panel on multidistrict
litigation for consideration in a matter captioned In re FEMA Trailer Formaldehyde Products
Liability Litigation, Case Number MDL 07-1873, United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Louisiana. The complaints generally assert claims for damages (for health related
problems, medical expenses, emotional distress and lost earnings) and for medical monitoring costs
due to the presence of formaldehyde in the units. Some of the lawsuits also seek punitive and/or
exemplary damages. Thus far, however, none of the lawsuits allege a specific amount of damages
sought and instead make general allegations about the nature of the plaintiffs claims without
placing a dollar figure on them. The Company strongly disputes the allegations in these complaints,
and intends to vigorously defend itself in all such matters.
In
addition, the Company is involved in certain litigation arising out
of its operations in the normal
course of its business, most of which are based upon state lemon laws, warranty claims, other
claims and accidents (for which the Company carries insurance above a specified deductible amount). In this
regard, the Company is a party to two companion lawsuits pending in Jefferson County, Texas which
were brought against it and its affiliates, each of which arises from a March 29, 2006 crash of a
bus manufactured by a subsidiary of the Company. At the mediation of the cases on June 15, 2010, a complete settlement of both cases was
reached. Formal settlement agreements were executed by each of the plaintiffs in August, and
counsel for all plaintiffs and cross-claimants have signed Notices of
Nonsuit which were filed with
both courts. The Company was informed that an Order of Dismissal was signed and entered in each of
the lawsuits, one on September 16, 2010 and the other on September 20, 2010, disposing of both
lawsuits.
While it is impossible to estimate with certainty the ultimate legal and financial liability with
respect to the litigation arising out of the Companys operations in the normal course of business, including
the litigation described above, the Company believes that while the final resolution of any such litigation
may have an impact on its consolidated results for a particular reporting period, the ultimate
disposition of such litigation will not have any material adverse
effect on its financial position,
results of operation or liquidity.
On June 25, 2010, the Company and certain of its officers and directors were sued in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Dayton Division by Teamsters Allied
Benefit Funds, individually and purportedly on behalf of a class of all those who purchased or
acquired Thor common stock between November 30, 2009 to June 10, 2010. The complaint alleged
violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, alleging that the
Companys SEC filings and press releases were false and misleading due, among other things, to the
Companys June 10, 2010 announcement that financial statements might need to be restated. The
Company has since announced that a restatement is not necessary. The Company believes the lawsuit
was without merit, and plaintiff agreed to voluntarily dismiss the lawsuit without prejudice on
September 7, 2010.
J. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
In fiscal 2010, the Company purchased 3,980,000 shares of its common stock at $29.00 per share and
held them as treasury stock at a total cost of $115,420.
The shares were repurchased by the Company from the Estate of Wade F. B. Thompson (the Estate) in
a private transaction. The late Wade F. B. Thompson was the Companys former Chairman, President
and Chief Executive Officer. The repurchase transaction was evaluated and approved by members of
the Companys Board of Directors who are not affiliated with the Estate. At the time of the
repurchase, the shares represented 7.2% of Thors common stock outstanding. The Company used
available cash to purchase the shares.
F-18
In fiscal 2008, the Company purchased 435,739 shares at an average cost of $31.12 per share and
held them as treasury stock at a total cost of $13,561.
The Board approved the Thor Industries, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the Equity Incentive
Plan) on October 16, 2006 and this plan was subsequently approved by shareholders at the 2006
annual meeting. The Equity Incentive Plan is designed, among other things, to replace the Companys
1999 Stock Option Plan (the 1999 Plan) and the Companys 1997 Restricted Stock Plan (the 1997
Plan). Upon approval of the Equity Incentive Plan, the 1999 Plan and the 1997 Plan were frozen. As
a result, there will be no further grants under options, restricted stock or other equity-based
awards pursuant to either the 1999 Plan or the 1997 Plan. However, outstanding grants under both
plans remain outstanding, subject to the respective terms and conditions of the plans. The maximum
number of shares issuable under the Equity Incentive Plan is 1,100,000. Awards may be in the form
of options (incentive stock options and non-statutory stock options), restricted stock, restricted
stock units, performance compensation awards and stock appreciation rights. 2,000,000 shares were
authorized under the 1999 Plan. Options expire 10 years from the date of grant and are vested
evenly over 3 to 5 years from the date of grant.
Stock Options A summary of option activity under the 1999 Plan and the Equity Incentive Plan is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Outstanding at beginning of year |
|
|
513,561 |
|
|
$ |
23.47 |
|
|
|
514,561 |
|
|
$ |
23.48 |
|
|
|
409,420 |
|
|
$ |
21.92 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(586 |
) |
|
|
26.91 |
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
26.91 |
|
|
|
(94,859 |
) |
|
|
23.25 |
|
Canceled |
|
|
(1,250 |
) |
|
|
27.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
870,000 |
|
|
|
34.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
26.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding and expected to
vest at end of year |
|
|
1,381,725 |
|
|
$ |
30.20 |
|
|
|
513,561 |
|
|
$ |
23.47 |
|
|
|
514,561 |
|
|
$ |
23.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at year-end |
|
|
445,057 |
|
|
$ |
22.99 |
|
|
|
380,227 |
|
|
$ |
22.39 |
|
|
|
313,311 |
|
|
$ |
21.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
weighted average remaining contractual life for outstanding options and exercisable options at
July 31, 2010, was 7.92 and 4.29 years, respectively.
The
aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable as of July 31, 2010, 2009 and
2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and expected to vest |
|
$ |
2,350 |
|
|
$ |
1,509 |
|
|
$ |
1,039 |
|
Aggregate intrinsic value of options exercisable |
|
$ |
2,263 |
|
|
$ |
1,509 |
|
|
$ |
1,039 |
|
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model. Assumptions utilized in the model are evaluated when awards are granted.
Forfeiture assumptions are revised as necessary to reflect experience. The fair value of the stock
options is based upon the market price of the underlying common stock as of the date of the grant,
reduced by the present value of estimated future dividends, and risk-free interest rates. The
risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. treasury
security rate estimated for the expected life of the options at the date of grant. Expected
volatilities are based on the historical volatility of the Companys stock. The expected term of
the options represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding and
is estimated using the Companys historical exercise and termination behavior.
The weighted average fair value of options granted in fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2008 were $14.69 and
$10.54, respectively, as calculated by the Black-Scholes method. There
were no option grants during fiscal 2009. The assumptions used in
determining the fair value of the options granted during fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2008 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
July 20, 2010 |
|
|
April 28, 2010 |
|
|
May 23, 2008 |
|
|
May 5, 2008 |
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
Expected life of grant |
|
6 years |
|
|
6 years |
|
|
6 years |
|
|
6 years |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
Expected dividend rate |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
In fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008 the Company recorded expenses of $1,375, $589 and $179,
respectively for stock option awards. At July 31, 2010, there was $12,830 of total unrecognized
compensation costs related to stock options that is expected to be recognized over a weighted
average period of 4.54 years.
F-19
Cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended July 31, 2010, July 31, 2009
and July 31, 2008 was $16, $27 and $2,205, respectively. The total intrinsic value of stock
options exercised in 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $3, $0 and $2,025, respectively.
The Company recognized a tax benefit related to stock based compensation expense of $481, $226 and
$249 in fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Exercises of options are satisfied with the issuance of new shares from authorized shares.
Stock Awards The Companys 1997 Restricted Stock Plan allowed for the granting of up to 600,000
shares of restricted stock to select executives. Restrictions expire
50% after five years following
the date of issue and the balance after six years.
A summary of stock award activity under this Plan is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Grant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Grant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Grant |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Date Fair Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Date Fair Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Date Fair Value |
|
Nonvested, Beginning of year |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
$ |
26.91 |
|
|
|
32,000 |
|
|
$ |
19.22 |
|
|
|
71,000 |
|
|
$ |
16.24 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
26.91 |
|
|
|
(28,000 |
) |
|
|
18.12 |
|
|
|
(39,000 |
) |
|
|
13.79 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested, End of year |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
$ |
26.91 |
|
|
|
32,000 |
|
|
$ |
19.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008 the Company recorded expense for restricted stock awards of $12,
$68 and $177, respectively. At July 31, 2010, there was no unrecognized compensation costs related
to restricted stock awards.
The total fair value of restricted stock vested during fiscal year 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $113,
$480 and $1,747, respectively.
K. JOINT VENTURES
In March 1996, the Company and Cruise America, Inc., an unrelated third party, formed a joint
venture, CAT Joint Venture LLC (CAT), to make short-term rentals of motorized recreation vehicles
to the public. As of July 31, 2010, the Company was contingently liable for repurchase obligations
of CAT inventory in the amount of $7,254. Any losses related to these obligations
would be shared equally by the Company and Cruise America. The Companys total investment at July
31, 2010 is $2,474.
In March 1994, the Company and a financial services company formed a joint venture, Thor Credit
Corporation (TCC), to finance sales of recreation vehicles to consumer buyers. This joint venture
was dissolved in September 2008 after the joint venture partner informed us that it was no longer
providing retail financing for recreation vehicles. The Company recovered its investment of $1,578
upon dissolution.
These investments are (or, in the case of TCC, were) 50% owned and are accounted for using the
equity method. The Companys share of the combined earnings for these investments was $217, $566
and $598 in fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and is included in the other income caption
of the Consolidated Statements of Income. Additionally, TCC paid the Company a referral fee based
upon the amount of loans generated from the Companys dealers. The Company recognized referral
income of $1,506 in fiscal 2008, which is included in the other income caption of the Consolidated
Statements of Income.
During fiscal 2010, the Companys Four Winds subsidiary had sales to Cruise America of $27,859 and
Cruise America did not have any sales to CAT. During fiscal 2009, the Companys Four Winds
subsidiary had sales to Cruise America of $13,623 and Cruise America did not have any sales to CAT.
During fiscal 2008, the Companys Four Winds subsidiary had sales to Cruise America of $19,485 and
Cruise America had sales to CAT of $9,106.
L. BUSINESS SEGMENTS
The Company has three reportable segments: 1.) towable recreation vehicles, 2.) motorized
recreation vehicles, and 3.) buses. The towable recreation vehicle segment consists of product
lines from the following operating companies that have been aggregated: Airstream, Breckenridge,
CrossRoads, Dutchmen, General Coach Hensall & Oliver, Keystone, and Komfort. The motorized
recreation vehicle segment consists of product lines from the following operating companies that
have been aggregated: Airstream, Damon and Four Winds. The bus segment consists of the following
operating companies that have been aggregated: Champion Bus, General Coach, ElDorado California,
ElDorado Kansas, Goshen Coach and SJC. The operations of SJC are aggregated in the buses reportable segment because SJC has similar economic characteristics to our
bus businesses and the nature of its products, production processes, types of customers,
distribution channels and regulatory environment are also similar to those within our
bus businesses.
F-20
Manufacturing and sales are conducted in the United States and, to a much lesser extent, in Canada.
Identifiable assets are those assets used in the operation of each reportable segment. Corporate
assets primarily consist of cash and cash equivalents, investments and deferred income tax assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recreation vehicles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towables |
|
$ |
1,556,591 |
|
|
$ |
953,279 |
|
|
$ |
1,763,099 |
|
Motorized |
|
|
291,958 |
|
|
|
161,727 |
|
|
|
461,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recreation Vehicles |
|
|
1,848,549 |
|
|
|
1,115,006 |
|
|
|
2,224,955 |
|
Buses |
|
|
428,008 |
|
|
|
406,890 |
|
|
|
415,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,276,557 |
|
|
$ |
1,521,896 |
|
|
$ |
2,640,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) before income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recreation vehicles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towables |
|
$ |
145,604 |
|
|
$ |
47,347 |
|
|
$ |
146,306 |
|
Motorized |
|
|
10,628 |
|
|
|
(29,728 |
) |
|
|
(522 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recreation vehicles |
|
|
156,232 |
|
|
|
17,619 |
|
|
|
145,784 |
|
Buses |
|
|
29,904 |
|
|
|
17,422 |
|
|
|
21,132 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
(14,743 |
) |
|
|
(11,646 |
) |
|
|
(14,509 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
171,393 |
|
|
$ |
23,395 |
|
|
$ |
152,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recreation vehicles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towables |
|
$ |
413,112 |
|
|
$ |
358,562 |
|
|
$ |
409,793 |
|
Motorized |
|
|
86,726 |
|
|
|
73,969 |
|
|
|
108,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recreation vehicles |
|
|
499,838 |
|
|
|
432,531 |
|
|
|
518,533 |
|
Buses |
|
|
124,374 |
|
|
|
106,823 |
|
|
|
110,647 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
339,861 |
|
|
|
411,770 |
|
|
|
367,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
964,073 |
|
|
$ |
951,124 |
|
|
$ |
996,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recreation vehicles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towables |
|
$ |
7,735 |
|
|
$ |
8,371 |
|
|
$ |
10,119 |
|
Motorized |
|
|
3,058 |
|
|
|
2,979 |
|
|
|
4,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recreation vehicles |
|
|
10,793 |
|
|
|
11,350 |
|
|
|
14,848 |
|
Buses |
|
|
1,981 |
|
|
|
1,864 |
|
|
|
2,035 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,229 |
|
|
$ |
13,483 |
|
|
$ |
17,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recreation vehicles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towables |
|
$ |
8,971 |
|
|
$ |
2,297 |
|
|
$ |
6,786 |
|
Motorized |
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
1,847 |
|
|
|
5,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recreation vehicles |
|
|
9,677 |
|
|
|
4,144 |
|
|
|
11,841 |
|
Buses |
|
|
2,888 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
1,094 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
1,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
12,767 |
|
|
$ |
5,135 |
|
|
$ |
14,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Export sales to Canada from our U.S. operations were $364,105, $237,584 and $421,008 in fiscal
2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
M. PRODUCT WARRANTY
The Company generally provides retail customers of its products with a one-year warranty covering
defects in material or workmanship, with longer warranties of up to five years on certain
structural components. The Company records a liability based on its best estimate of the amounts
necessary to settle future and existing claims on products sold as of the balance sheet date.
Factors used in estimating the warranty liability include a history of units sold, existing dealer
inventory, average cost incurred and a profile of the distribution of warranty expenditures over
the warranty period. A significant increase in dealer shop rates, the cost of parts or the
frequency of claims could have a material adverse impact on the Companys operating results for the
period or periods in which such claims or additional costs materialize.
F-21
Management believes that
the warranty reserves are adequate. However, actual claims incurred could differ from estimates,
requiring adjustments to the reserves. Warranty reserves are reviewed and adjusted as necessary on
at least a quarterly basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
July 31, 2010 |
|
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
|
July 31, 2008 |
|
Beginning Balance |
|
$ |
41,717 |
|
|
$ |
61,743 |
|
|
$ |
64,310 |
|
Provision |
|
|
57,314 |
|
|
|
32,236 |
|
|
|
63,525 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(47,564 |
) |
|
|
(52,262 |
) |
|
|
(66,092 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance |
|
$ |
51,467 |
|
|
$ |
41,717 |
|
|
$ |
61,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. SALE OF BUSINESSES
In June 2008, the Company sold its Thor California travel trailer and fifth wheel business to MVP
RV Acquisition Corporation (MVP), a new company owned by Thor Californias former management
team. In connection with the sale, the Company received a note receivable of $2,401 payable over
seven years which bears interest at 6% per annum. The Company subleased a production facility to
MVP but remains an obligor under the lease. The Company also agreed to continue to provide certain
limited financial support to MVP with respect to its flooring arrangements. MVP agreed to assume
certain balance sheet liabilities of Thor California, including liabilities with respect to
warranty claims. As repayment of the note, which constituted the principal consideration in the
transaction, was dependent on future successful operations of the purchaser, and based on the
continuing relationship subsequent to the closing date, the Company determined that it retained
substantial risks of the business. Accordingly, although legal transfer of ownership of the
business occurred, the sale was not treated as a divestiture for accounting purposes. The Company
recorded provisions of $5,411 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 in connection with this sale
transaction relating to asset impairment and pre-existing liabilities. In fiscal 2009 the Company
recorded additional expense of $1,036 related to warranty and other costs associated with Thor
California.
In October 2009, the Company decided to close its Citair General Coach production facility in
Oliver, British Columbia and move all General Coach RV and park model production to its other
Citair General Coach facility in Hensall, Ontario. As of April 30, 2010, all production ceased at
the Citair Oliver facility. Related closure costs of approximately $3,640 were recorded in fiscal
2010, consisting of $1,710 primarily in cost of products sold for inventory and warranty and
$1,930 in severance and other costs included in selling, general and administrative expenses.
On April 30, 2010, the Company sold its Citair travel trailer and park model business to a former
member of Citairs management. Citair did business in Canada under the names General Coach, Hensall
and General Coach, Oliver. The Company recorded a $323 pre-tax loss on the sale.
O. THOR CC, INC.
In March 1994, the Company and a financial services company formed a joint venture, Thor Credit
Corporation, to finance the sale of recreation vehicles to consumer buyers. This joint venture was
dissolved in September 2008 after the joint venture partner informed the Company that it was no
longer providing retail financing for recreation vehicles. We recovered our investment of $1,578
upon dissolution.
In November 2008, the Company announced it would again be providing retail financing for recreation
vehicle customers of Thor dealers through the Companys wholly owned subsidiary, Thor CC, Inc.
(Thor CC). The business was led by employees of the former joint venture and financed new and
used Thor recreation vehicle products sold by our dealers.
On April 5, 2010 Thor selected GMAC Financial Services (GMAC) as the preferred retail finance
provider for its retail customers. Thor CC continued to offer retail financing to Thor dealers
until GMAC launched its program in May 2010, but has since ceased new loan activity. GMAC is
accepting retail financing applications from Thor dealers for both new and used recreation
vehicles, and plans to expand nationwide to all Thor dealers by the end of this calendar year.
The Company has closed Thor CC and has recognized $627 of corporate costs in
connection therewith as of July 31, 2010.
F-22
P. CONCENTRATION OF RISK
One dealer accounted for 12% of the Companys bus sales for fiscal 2010. The loss of this dealer
could have a significant effect on the Companys bus business. One dealer accounted for 18% of the
Companys consolidated recreation vehicle net sales for fiscal 2010 and 15% of its consolidated net
sales for fiscal 2010. The loss of this dealer could have a significant effect on the Companys
business.
Q. LOAN TRANSACTIONS AND RELATED NOTES RECEIVABLE
On January 15, 2009, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement (the First Credit Agreement)
with Stephen Adams, in his individual capacity, and Stephen Adams and his successors, as trustee
under the Stephen Adams Living Trust (the Trust and together with each of
the foregoing persons, the Borrowers), pursuant to which the Company loaned $10,000 to the
Borrowers (the First Loan). The Borrowers own, directly or indirectly, a controlling interest in
FreedomRoads Holding Company, LLC (FreedomRoads Holding), the parent company of FreedomRoads, LLC
(FreedomRoads), the Companys largest dealer. Pursuant to the terms of the First Credit
Agreement, the Borrowers agreed to use the proceeds of the First Loan solely to make an equity
contribution to FreedomRoads Holding to enable FreedomRoads Holding or its subsidiaries to repay
its principal obligations under floor plan financing arrangements with third parties in respect of
products of the Company and its subsidiaries.
The principal amount of the First Loan is payable in full on January 15, 2014 and bears interest at
a rate of 12% per annum. Interest is payable in kind for the first year and is payable in cash on a
monthly basis thereafter, and all interest payments due to date have been paid in full.
On January 30, 2009, the Company entered into a Second Credit Agreement (the Second Credit
Agreement) with the Borrowers pursuant to which the Company loaned an additional $10,000 to the
Borrowers (the Second Loan). Pursuant to the terms of the Second Credit Agreement, the Borrowers
agreed to use the proceeds of the Second Loan solely to make an equity contribution to FreedomRoads
Holding to be used by FreedomRoads Holding or its subsidiaries to purchase the Companys products.
The maturity date of the Second Loan is June 30, 2012. Principal is payable in semi-annual
installments of $1,000 each commencing on June 30, 2010, with a final payment of $6,000 on June 30,
2012. Interest on the principal amount of the Second Loan is payable in cash on a quarterly basis
at a rate of 12% per annum. All payments of principal and interest due to date have been paid in
full.
On December 22, 2009, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement (the Third Credit Agreement)
with Marcus Lemonis, Stephen Adams, in his individual capacity, and Stephen Adams and his
successors, as trustee under the Trust (each of the foregoing persons, on a joint and several
basis, the Third Loan Borrowers), pursuant to which the Company loaned $10,000 to the Third Loan
Borrowers (the Third Loan). The Third Loan Borrowers own, directly or indirectly, a controlling
interest in FreedomRoads Holding, the indirect parent company of FreedomRoads. Pursuant to the
terms of the Third Credit Agreement, the Third Loan Borrowers agreed to use the proceeds of the
Third Loan solely to provide a loan to one of FreedomRoads Holdings subsidiaries which would
ultimately be contributed as equity to FreedomRoads to be used for working capital purposes.
The maturity date of the Third Loan is December 22, 2014. The principal amount of the Third Loan is
payable on the following dates in the following amounts: December 31, 2011 $500; December 31,
2012 $1,000; December 31, 2013 $1,100; and December 22, 2014 $7,400. The principal amount
of the Third Loan bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum. Interest is payable, at the option of
the Third Loan Borrowers, either in cash or in kind at each calendar quarter end from March 31,
2010 through September 30, 2011, and thereafter in cash quarterly in arrears from December 31, 2011
through the Maturity Date. The Third Loan Borrowers opted to pay the interest due at March 31, 2010
and June 30, 2010 in kind and it was capitalized as part of the long-term note receivable.
The First Credit Agreement, the Second Credit Agreement and the Third Credit Agreement each contain
customary representations and warranties, affirmative and negative covenants, events of default and
acceleration provisions for loans of this type.
In connection with the First Loan, the Borrowers caused FreedomRoads Holding and its subsidiaries
(collectively, the FR Dealers), to enter into an agreement pursuant to which the FR Dealers
agreed to purchase additional recreation vehicles from the Company and its subsidiaries. The term
of this agreement, as subsequently amended in connection with the Second Loan and the Third Loan,
continues until December 22, 2029 unless earlier terminated in accordance with its terms.
Along with the repurchase agreements described in Note I between the Company and FR Dealers
financing institutions, the Company considered the Loans to be variable interests in FreedomRoads
Holding and its subsidiaries.
The Company concluded it is not the primary beneficiary and that consolidation of any of the FR dealers would be inappropriate. The maximum exposure to loss related to FreedomRoads includes the amounts receivable from FreedomRoads for principal and interest on the notes and repurchase obligations as discussed above.
F-23
For fiscal 2010, FreedomRoads accounted for 18% of the Companys consolidated recreation vehicle
net sales and 15% of its consolidated
net sales. For fiscal year 2009, FreedomRoads accounted for 15% of the Companys consolidated
recreation vehicle net sales and 11% of the Companys consolidated net sales.
R. FIRE AT BUS PRODUCTION FACILITY
On February 14, 2010, a fire occurred at the northern production facility (the Facility) at
the Companys manufacturing site located near Imlay City, Michigan. The Facility is one of the
Companys principal manufacturing locations for its Champion and General Coach America bus lines.
The fire resulted in the destruction of a significant portion of the work in process, raw materials
and equipment contained in the Facility. There were no reported injuries and the origin of the fire
is undetermined. The southern production plant, paint facility and other buildings at the site were
not affected by the fire and remain intact. The Company resumed limited production activities
for its Champion and General Coach America buses in the southern manufacturing facility. In
addition, the Company addressed equipment and staffing
reallocation. Many employees continued to
work out of the southern manufacturing facility and an office building on this site on a temporary
basis.
The Company maintains a property and business interruption insurance policy that it believes
will provide substantial coverage for the currently foreseeable losses arising from this incident,
less up to the first $5,000 representing the Companys deductible per the policy.
The Company received $13,313 of insurance proceeds as of July 31, 2010. Of these proceeds,
$13,079 represents recognized insurance recoveries, net of the deductible, and $234 represents
advances recorded as deferred revenue in other liabilities. Through July 31, 2010, the cost
incurred and insurance recoveries recognized, including $6,087 for business interruption ($4,121
net of applied deductible), are reflected in the Companys consolidated statements of
income as follows:
Gain on Involuntary Conversion:
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance recoveries recognized |
|
$ |
18,079 |
|
Deductible |
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
WIP and raw material destroyed |
|
|
(4,305 |
) |
Property and equipment destroyed |
|
|
(578 |
) |
Clean up and other costs |
|
|
(603 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on Involuntary Conversion |
|
$ |
7,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
The costs incurred to date of reconstructing the Facility and replacing inventory have been
accounted for in the normal course of business. The costs incurred as of July 31, 2010 to
reconstruct the Facility totaled $1,483, and the Facility is substantially completed and operational as of
September 28, 2010. The Company expects that a.) the replacement cost of the property and equipment
will substantially exceed the current carrying costs, and b.) lost profits covered under business
interruption and future clean-up and related costs will be reimbursed under the policy, however, an
accurate estimate of the remaining potential gain resulting from the involuntary conversion cannot
be made at this time.
S. ACQUISITION
On March 1, 2010, the Company acquired 100% of SJC Industries Corp. (SJC), a privately-held
manufacturer of ambulances based in Elkhart, Indiana, for $19,756 in cash and $325 of future cash
obligations to the seller for a total purchase price of $20,081. The Company believes that SJC is
currently the second largest manufacturer of ambulances in the United States. Its brands include
McCoy Miller, Marque and Premiere, each of which is sold through a nationwide network of dealers.
The Company believes that the ambulance business is a natural fit with Thors bus business and has
included the operations of SJC in its Buses reportable segment. Under Thors ownership, SJC will
continue as an independent operation, in the same manner as the Companys recreation vehicle and
bus companies. The operations of SJC are included in the Companys operating results from the date
of its acquisition. Through July 31, 2010, SJC recorded net sales of $13,218 and acquisition costs
were not material.
F-24
Based on internal and independent external valuations the Company preliminarily allocated the
purchase price to the net identifiable assets of SJC as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Net working capital |
|
$ |
7,412 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
2,459 |
|
Dealer network |
|
|
5,230 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
2,490 |
|
Trademarks |
|
|
2,100 |
|
Technology |
|
|
270 |
|
Non-compete |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized intangible assets have a weighted average useful life of 13.4 years. The dealer
network will be amortized on a straight line basis over 14 years, and the technology assets and
non-compete agreements, will both be amortized on a straight line basis over 5 years. Goodwill and
trademarks are not subject to amortization. The entire goodwill balance is tax deductible. Proforma
financial information has not been presented due to its insignificance.
T. LIQUIDATION OF INSURANCE SUBSIDIARY
The Company does not intend to insure any future risks through its insurance subsidiary because of
the uncertainty of the timing of the deductibility of the insurance premium. Further, the Company
does not believe that the future benefits of the insurance subsidiary, including the risk shifting
and risk distribution among the Companys operating subsidiaries, are in excess of the
administrative cost of maintenance. Effective May 31, 2010, the insurance subsidiary was fully
liquidated and dissolved and the Company did not incur any losses related to the liquidation.
U. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On September 16, 2010, the Company consummated its acquisition of Towables Holdings, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (Holdings) which owns all of the outstanding equity interests of Heartland
Recreational Vehicles, LLC, an Indiana limited liability company (Heartland), pursuant to a Stock
Purchase Agreement (the Purchase Agreement), dated as of September 16, 2010, by and among the
Company, Heartland, Heartland RV Holdings, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (Seller), and
certain other parties named therein. Heartland is engaged in the business of manufacturing and
marketing recreation vehicles, consisting of travel trailers and fifth-wheel vehicles. Under the
terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company purchased all of the outstanding capital stock of
Holdings (the Transaction).
The consideration paid by the Company to Seller consisted of $100,000 in cash (less the amount of
Heartlands capital lease obligations of approximately $438) and 4,300,000 shares of the Companys
unregistered common stock (the Thor Shares). The Thor Shares were issued to the indirect
securityholders of Seller pursuant to the exemption from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Act), set forth in Section 4(2) of the Act. The cash
portion of the consideration was funded entirely from the Companys cash on hand. The cash portion
of the consideration is subject to adjustment following the completion of an audit of the financial
statements of Holdings after the closing of the Transaction as described in the Purchase Agreement.
Under the Purchase Agreement, Seller and two equityholders that indirectly owned a majority of the
equity interests of Seller (collectively, the Seller Owners), agreed to indemnify the Company and
certain specified Company indemnitees from and against any losses resulting from (i) breaches of
representations and warranties of Seller, Holdings, Heartland, and the Seller Owners set forth in
the Purchase Agreement, (ii) non-compliance with covenants of Seller, Holdings, Heartland, and the
Seller Owners set forth in the Purchase Agreement, (iii) taxes of Holdings and Heartland for
pre-closing periods and/or (iv) certain other specified potential operational liabilities, subject,
in the case of indemnification for breaches of representations and warranties, to a threshold in
the amount of $10, a deductible in the amount of $1,000 and, in the case of substantially all of
the representations and warranties, an overall cap of $15,000. The Company also agreed to indemnify
the Seller and certain specified Seller indemnitees for (a) breaches of representations and
warranties by the Company, and/or (b) non-compliance with covenants by the Company. The Company is
subject to an equivalent threshold, deductible and cap with respect
to its indemnification obligations.
Heartland will operate as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company following the Transaction
in the same manner as the Companys existing recreation vehicle
and bus companies.
The assets acquired as a result of the Transaction include equipment and other tangible and intangible
property. The assets of Heartland will be used in connection with the operation of Heartlands
business of manufacturing towable recreation vehicles.
As part of the Transaction, senior management of Heartland entered into non-competition agreements
with the Company and its subsidiaries. Members of management of Heartland who received Thor Shares
also entered into a stock restriction agreement with the Company, which, among other things, places
restrictions on the disposition of the Companys common stock issued to such persons for a period
of four years after the closing of the Transaction, which restrictions lapse in pro rata amounts
beginning on the first anniversary of the closing of the Transaction and every six months
thereafter, with an exception for certain permitted acceleration events. In addition, the Company
granted to the former indirect securityholders of Heartland who received Thor Shares registration
rights to register the resale of the Thor Shares.
***********
F-25