e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 000-27115
PCTEL, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
77-0364943
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
|
|
|
471 Brighton Drive,
Bloomingdale, IL
(Address of Principal Executive Office)
|
|
60108
(Zip Code) |
(630) 372-6800
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Date File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of
accelerated filer large accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act:
Large accelerated filer o |
Accelerated filer þ |
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Title |
|
Outstanding |
Common Stock, par value $.001 per share
|
|
18,530,207 as of May 9, 2011 |
PCTEL, INC.
Form 10-Q
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1: Financial Statements
PCTEL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
18,929 |
|
|
$ |
23,998 |
|
Short-term investment securities |
|
|
34,377 |
|
|
|
37,146 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
of $165 and $160 at March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively |
|
|
14,436 |
|
|
|
13,873 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
11,565 |
|
|
|
10,729 |
|
Deferred tax assets, net |
|
|
1,013 |
|
|
|
1,013 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
4,482 |
|
|
|
3,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
84,802 |
|
|
|
90,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
12,254 |
|
|
|
11,088 |
|
Long-term investment securities |
|
|
14,829 |
|
|
|
9,802 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
10,593 |
|
|
|
8,865 |
|
Deferred tax assets, net |
|
|
9,004 |
|
|
|
9,004 |
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
1,358 |
|
|
|
1,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
132,840 |
|
|
$ |
130,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
6,348 |
|
|
$ |
4,253 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
5,646 |
|
|
|
7,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
11,994 |
|
|
|
11,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
|
2,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
14,194 |
|
|
|
13,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable equity |
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares
authorized, 18,533,760 and 18,285,784 shares issued and
outstanding at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
137,048 |
|
|
|
137,154 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(21,863 |
) |
|
|
(20,578 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity of PCTEL, Inc. |
|
|
115,277 |
|
|
|
116,655 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
2,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
117,715 |
|
|
|
116,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
$ |
132,840 |
|
|
$ |
130,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
PCTEL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
REVENUES |
|
$ |
18,233 |
|
|
$ |
15,573 |
|
COST OF REVENUES |
|
|
10,012 |
|
|
|
8,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS PROFIT |
|
|
8,221 |
|
|
|
7,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
6,156 |
|
|
|
3,085 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
2,608 |
|
|
|
2,259 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
2,718 |
|
|
|
2,552 |
|
Amortization of other intangible assets |
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
12,154 |
|
|
|
8,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING LOSS |
|
|
(3,933 |
) |
|
|
(1,440 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
1,729 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
|
(2,204 |
) |
|
|
(1,281 |
) |
Benefit for income taxes |
|
|
(304 |
) |
|
|
(486 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS |
|
|
(1,900 |
) |
|
|
(795 |
) |
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(1,781 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO PCTEL, INC. |
|
|
($119 |
) |
|
|
($795 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Adjustments to redemption value of
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(1,166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS AVAILABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS |
|
|
($1,285 |
) |
|
|
($795 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss available to common shareholders |
|
|
($0.07 |
) |
|
|
($0.05 |
) |
Diluted Earnings per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss available to common shareholders |
|
|
($0.07 |
) |
|
|
($0.05 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares Basic |
|
|
17,199 |
|
|
|
17,487 |
|
Weighted average shares Diluted |
|
|
17,199 |
|
|
|
17,487 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
PCTEL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited, in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
($1,900 |
) |
|
|
($795 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,303 |
|
|
|
1,332 |
|
Gain on bargain purchase of acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
Amortization of stock based compensation |
|
|
821 |
|
|
|
952 |
|
Share based expense |
|
|
1,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal/sale of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
Payment of withholding tax on stock based compensation |
|
|
(1,197 |
) |
|
|
(664 |
) |
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(562 |
) |
|
|
(2,895 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(831 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(793 |
) |
|
|
(339 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
2,093 |
|
|
|
(520 |
) |
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
(1,624 |
) |
|
|
1,366 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(1,297 |
) |
|
|
(1,063 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(1,800 |
) |
|
|
(152 |
) |
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Purchase of investments |
|
|
(17,663 |
) |
|
|
(9,744 |
) |
Redemptions/maturities of short-term investments |
|
|
15,405 |
|
|
|
8,435 |
|
Purchase of assets/businesses, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,109 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(4,058 |
) |
|
|
(3,567 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(5,085 |
) |
|
|
(4,405 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
23,998 |
|
|
|
35,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period |
|
$ |
18,929 |
|
|
$ |
31,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
PCTEL, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 (Unaudited)
(in thousands)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and
with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not
include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments
(consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been
included. For further information, refer to the audited consolidated financial statements and
footnotes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2010.
Nature of Operations
PCTEL is a global leader in propagation and optimization solutions for the wireless industry. The
Company designs and develops software-based radios (scanning receivers) for wireless network
optimization and develops and distributes innovative antenna solutions. Additionally, the Company
has licensed its intellectual property, principally related to a discontinued modem business, to
semiconductor, PC manufacturers, modem suppliers, and others.
The Company designs, distributes, and supports innovative antenna solutions for public safety
applications, unlicensed and licensed wireless broadband, fleet management, network timing, and
other global positioning systems (GPS) applications. The Companys portfolio of scanning
receivers and interference management solutions are used to measure, monitor and optimize cellular
networks.
In 2010, the Company operated in one segment for reporting purposes. Beginning with the formation
of PCTEL Secure in January 2011, the Company reports the financial results of PCTEL Secure as a
separate operating segment. The Companys chief operating decision maker (CODM) uses the profit
and loss results and the assets in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance
between the segments.
Antenna Products
PCTELs MAXRAD®, Bluewave and Wi-Sys antenna solutions address public safety, military, and
government applications; supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA), health care, energy,
smart grid and agricultural applications; indoor wireless, wireless
backhaul, and cellular applications. Revenue growth for antenna products is driven by emerging
wireless applications in these markets. The Companys portfolio includes a broad range of WiMAX
antennas, land mobile radio (LMR) antennas, and precision GPS antennas that serve innovative
applications in telemetry, radio frequency identification (RFID), WiFi, fleet management, and
mesh networks. The Companys antenna products are primarily sold through distributors and original
equipment manufacturer (OEM) equipment providers.
The Company established its current antenna product portfolio with a series of acquisitions. In
2004 the Company acquired MAXRAD as well as certain product lines from Andrew, which established
its core product offerings in WiFi, LMR and GPS. Over the next several years the Company added
additional capabilities within those product lines and additional served markets with the
acquisitions of certain assets of Bluewave Antenna Systems, Ltd (Bluewave) in 2008, Wi-Sys
Communications, Inc (Wi-Sys) in 2009, and Sparco Technologies, Inc. (Sparco) in 2010. The
Companys WiMAX antenna products were developed and brought to market through the Companys on
going operations.
Scanning Receivers
PCTEL is a leading supplier of high-speed, multi-standard, demodulating receivers and test and
measurement solutions to the wireless industry worldwide. The Companys SeeGull® scanning
receivers, receiver-based products and CLARIFY® interference management solutions are used to
measure, monitor and optimize cellular networks. Revenue growth for scanning receiver and
interference management products is driven by the deployment of new wireless technology and the
need for wireless networks to be tuned and reconfigured on a regular basis. The Company develops
and supports scanning receivers for LTE, EVDO, CDMA, WCDMA, GSM, TD-SCDMA, and WiMAX networks. The
Companys scanning receiver products are sold primarily through test and measurement value added
resellers and to a lesser extent directly to network operators.
The Company established its scanning receiver product portfolio in 2003 with the acquisition of
certain assets of Dynamic
6
Telecommunications, Inc. In 2009 the Company acquired the scanning
receiver business of Ascom Network Testing, Inc (Ascom) as well as the exclusive distribution
rights and patented technology for Wider Networks (Wider) network interference products.
The Company also has an intellectual property portfolio related to antennas, the mounting of
antennas, and scanning receivers. These patents are being held for defensive purposes and are not
part of an active licensing program.
Secure applications
On January 5, 2011, the Company formed PCTEL Secure LLC (PCTEL Secure), a joint venture limited
liability company, with Eclipse Design Technologies, Inc (Eclipse). PCTEL Secure will design
Android-based, secure communication products. The Company contributed $2.5 million in cash in
return for 51% ownership of the joint venture and Eclipse contributed $2.4 million of intangible
assets in return for 49% ownership of the joint venture.
Basis of Consolidation and Foreign Currency Translation
The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2011 and the condensed consolidated
statements of operations and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 are
unaudited and reflect all adjustments of a normal recurring nature that are, in the opinion of
management, necessary for a fair presentation of the interim period financial statements. The
interim condensed consolidated financial statements are derived from the audited financial
statements as of December 31, 2010.
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
subsidiaries. The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PCTEL
Secure. Because the Company has a 51% ownership interest in PCTEL Secure, 49% of PCTEL Secures
net loss is recorded as noncontrolling interest in the statements of operations for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 49% of the equity in PCTEL Secure is recorded as noncontrolling
interest. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared
pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. have been
condensed or omitted. The significant accounting policies followed by the Company are set forth
within the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the 2010
Form 10-K). There were no changes in the Companys significant accounting policies during the
three months ended March 31, 2011. In addition, the Company reaffirms the use of estimates in the
preparation of the financial statements as set forth in the 2010 Form 10-K. These interim
condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the 2010 Form 10-K. The
results for the operations for the period ended March 31, 2011 may not be indicative of the results
for the period ended December 31, 2011.
The Company is exposed to foreign currency fluctuations due to its foreign operations and because
products are sold internationally. The functional currency for the Companys foreign operations is
predominantly the applicable local currency. Accounts of foreign operations are translated into
U.S. dollars using the exchange rate in effect at the applicable balance sheet date for assets and
liabilities and average monthly rates prevailing during the period for revenue and expense
accounts. Adjustments resulting from translation are included in accumulated other comprehensive
income, a separate component of shareholders equity. Gains and losses resulting from other
transactions originally in foreign currencies and then translated into U.S. dollars are included in
condensed consolidated statement of operations. Net foreign exchange losses resulting from foreign
currency transactions included in other income, net were $8 and $14 for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Cash and cash equivalents are measured at fair value and investments are recognized at amortized
cost in the Companys financial statements. Accounts receivable and other investments are
financial assets with carrying values that approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of
these assets. Accounts payable is a financial liability with a carrying value that approximates
fair value due to the short-term nature of these liabilities. The Company follows Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820), which establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires
the Company to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs
when measuring fair value. A financial instruments categorization within the hierarchy is based on
the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ASC 820 establishes
three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1: inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities.
Level 2: inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as
quoted prices in active markets for similar assets
7
and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or
similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable
or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of assets or
liabilities.
Level 3: unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are
significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update (ASC) No. 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements, which amends the
Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. ASU
No. 2010-06 amends the ASC to require disclosure of transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2
fair value measurements, and requires more detailed disclosure about the activity within Level 3
fair value measurements. The guidance became effective for us with the reporting period beginning
January 1, 2010. The guidance did not have any impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements
3. Balance Sheet Data
Cash and Cash equivalents
At March 31, 2011, cash and cash equivalents included bank balances and investments with
original maturities less than 90 days. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Companys cash
equivalents were invested in highly liquid AAA money market funds that are required to comply with
Rule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. Such funds utilize the amortized cost method of
accounting, seek to maintain a constant $1.00 per share price, and are redeemable upon demand. The
Company restricts its investments in AAA money market funds to those invested 100% in either
short-term U.S. Government Agency securities or bank repurchase agreements collateralized by the
these same securities. The fair values of these money market funds are established through quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1 inputs). The cash in the Companys U.S.
banks is fully insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation due to the balances being below
the maximum insured amounts.
The Company had $0.8 million and $0.7 million of cash and cash equivalents in foreign bank accounts
at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. As of March 31, 2011, the Company has no
intentions of repatriating the cash in its foreign bank accounts. If the Company decides to
repatriate the cash in the foreign bank accounts, it may experience difficulty in doing so in a
timely manner. The
Company may also be exposed to foreign currency fluctuations and taxes if it repatriates these
funds.
Investments
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Companys short-term and long-term investments
consisted of pre-refunded municipal bonds, U.S. government agency bonds, and AA or higher rated
corporate bonds all classified as held-to-maturity
At March 31, 2011, the Company had invested $24.5 million in pre-refunded municipal bonds, $17.1
million in U.S. government agency bonds and $7.6 million in AA rated or higher corporate bonds.
The income and principal from the pre-refunded municipal bonds are secured by an irrevocable trust
of U.S Treasury securities. The bonds, classified as short-term investments, have original
maturities greater than 90 days and mature in less than one year. At March 31, 2011, the Company
had $14.8 million classified as long-term investment securities. The bonds classified as long-term
investments have maturities greater than one year but less than two years. The Companys bonds are
recorded at the purchase price and carried at amortized cost. The net unrealized gains were $34 at
March 31, 2011. Approximately 18% of the Companys bonds were protected by bond default insurance
at March 31, 2011.
At December 31, 2010, the Company had invested $19.2 million in pre-refunded municipal bonds, $19.0
million in U.S. government agency bonds, and $8.7 million in AA rated or higher corporate bonds,
and classified $9.8 million as long-term investment securities because the original maturities were
greater than one year.
The Company categorizes its financial instruments within a fair value hierarchy established in
accounting and disclosures for fair value measurements. The fair value hierarchy is described
under the Fair Value of Financial Instruments in Note 1. For the Level 2 investments, the Company
uses quoted prices of similar assets in active markets.
8
Cash equivalents and investments measured
at fair value were as follows at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
Cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds |
|
$ |
13,820 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,820 |
|
|
$ |
21,032 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
21,032 |
|
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US government agency bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,036 |
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,378 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,820 |
|
|
$ |
49,240 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
63,060 |
|
|
$ |
21,032 |
|
|
$ |
47,170 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
68,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts receivable are recorded at invoiced amount with standard net terms that range between
30 and 60 days. The Company extends credit to its customers based on an evaluation of a companys
financial condition and collateral is generally not required. The Company maintains an allowance
for doubtful accounts for estimated uncollectible accounts receivable. The allowance is based on
the Companys assessment of known delinquent accounts, historical experience, and other currently
available evidence of the collectability and the aging of accounts receivable. The Companys
allowance for doubtful accounts was $0.2 million at each of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively. The provision for doubtful accounts is included in sales and marketing expense in
the condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market and include material, labor and overhead
costs using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method of costing. Inventories as of March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010 were composed of raw materials, sub-assemblies, finished goods and
work-in-process. The Company had consigned inventory with customers of $0.8 million and $1.0
million at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The Company records allowances to
reduce the value of inventory to the lower of cost or market, including allowances for excess and
obsolete inventory. The allowance for inventory losses was $1.0 million at both March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010.
Inventories consisted of the following at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
8,507 |
|
|
$ |
7,613 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
542 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
2,469 |
|
|
|
2,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net |
|
$ |
11,565 |
|
|
$ |
10,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid and other current assets
Prepaid assets are stated at cost and are amortized over the useful lives (up to one year) of
the assets.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line method
over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The Company depreciates computer equipment over
three to five years, office equipment, manufacturing and test equipment, and motor vehicles over
five years, furniture and fixtures over seven years, and buildings over 30 years. Leasehold
improvements are amortized over the shorter of the corresponding lease term or useful life.
Depreciation expense and gains and losses on the disposal of property and equipment are included in
cost of sales and operating expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.
9
Property and equipment consists of the following at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Building |
|
$ |
6,207 |
|
|
$ |
6,207 |
|
Computers and office equipment |
|
|
5,757 |
|
|
|
4,450 |
|
Manufacturing and test equipment |
|
|
8,142 |
|
|
|
7,707 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
|
1,127 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
Motor vehicles |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment |
|
|
21,496 |
|
|
|
19,694 |
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(11,012 |
) |
|
|
(10,376 |
) |
Land |
|
|
1,770 |
|
|
|
1,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
12,254 |
|
|
$ |
11,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible Assets
The Company amortizes intangible assets with finite lives on a straight-line basis over the
estimated useful lives, which range from one to eight years. The summary of other intangible
assets, net as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Book |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Book |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
Customer contracts and relationships |
|
$ |
16,763 |
|
|
$ |
9,192 |
|
|
$ |
7,571 |
|
|
$ |
16,763 |
|
|
$ |
8,743 |
|
|
$ |
8,020 |
|
Patents and technology |
|
|
7,409 |
|
|
|
6,037 |
|
|
|
1,372 |
|
|
|
6,312 |
|
|
|
6,007 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
Trademarks and trade names |
|
|
2,603 |
|
|
|
2,153 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
2,603 |
|
|
|
2,074 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,017 |
|
|
|
1,817 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
1,714 |
|
|
|
1,703 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,792 |
|
|
$ |
19,199 |
|
|
$ |
10,593 |
|
|
$ |
27,392 |
|
|
$ |
18,527 |
|
|
$ |
8,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $1.7 million increase in intangible assets at March 31, 2011 compared to December 31, 2010
reflects $2.4 million of intangible assets contributed by Eclipse to PCTEL Secure in January 2011
offsetting amortization of $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011. See Note 4 for
information related to PCTEL Secure.
In December 2010, the Company recorded an impairment of other intangible assets of $1.1 million.
The impairment expense included $0.9 million for an impairment of the distribution rights and trade
name acquired in the Wider settlement, and $0.2 million for a partial impairment of the technology
and non-compete agreements acquired from Ascom. The 2010 revenues resulting from the products
acquired from Ascom and the products related to the settlement with Wider were significantly lower
than the Companys revenue projections used in the original accounting valuations. The Company
considered these revenue variances as a triggering event that the carrying value of the long lived
intangible assets subject to amortization may not be fully recoverable and may be less than the
fair value at December 31, 2010.
The
Companys scheduled amortization expense for the next five years
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
Amount |
2011 |
|
$ |
2,075 |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
2,803 |
|
2013 |
|
$ |
2,478 |
|
2014 |
|
$ |
1,961 |
|
2015 |
|
$ |
1,251 |
|
thereafter |
|
$ |
25 |
|
The following table presents the fair value measurements of non-recurring assets for continuing
operations at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
Gain (Loss) |
Intangible assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,865 |
|
|
$ |
8,865 |
|
|
$ |
(1,084 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,865 |
|
|
$ |
8,865 |
|
|
$ |
(1,084 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
10
Liabilities
Accrued liabilities consist of the following at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Inventory receipts |
|
$ |
1,760 |
|
|
$ |
2,444 |
|
Paid time off |
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
846 |
|
Payroll, bonuses, and other employee benefits |
|
|
823 |
|
|
|
1,615 |
|
Deferred revenues |
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
Due to Sparco shareholders |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
Due to Wider |
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
Real estate taxes |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
Warranties |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
Employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
Other |
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,646 |
|
|
$ |
7,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Executive deferred compensation plan |
|
$ |
1,286 |
|
|
$ |
1,187 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
824 |
|
Deferred rent |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
Deferred revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,200 |
|
|
$ |
2,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. PCTEL Secure
On January 5, 2011, the Company formed PCTEL Secure LLC, a joint venture limited liability
company, with Eclipse Design Technologies, Inc. PCTEL Secure designs software and secure
digital-based solutions that will enable secure applications on commercial Android cellular phone
platforms. The Company contributed $2.5 million in cash on the formation of the venture in return
for 51% ownership of the joint venture. In return for 49% ownership of the joint venture, Eclipse
contributed $2.4 million of intangible assets in the form of intellectual property and a services
agreement, including an assembled workforce, to provide services.
The initial capitalization of PCTEL Secure was $4.9 million, consisting of $2.5 million of cash,
$1.1 million of in-process research and development, $0.8 million for non-compete agreements, and
$0.5 million for service agreements. The values for the intangible assets were the fair values of
the intangible assets modeled at the time of the agreement. The intangible assets are being
amortized for book purposes, but are not deductible for tax purposes. The weighted average
amortization period of the intangible assets acquired is 2.4 years. The Company estimated the fair
value (and remaining useful lives) of the assets.
The Company provides services to PCTEL Secure at cost for facilities, general and administrative
services, order management, manufacturing and distribution, and marketing services. The term of
this services agreement is through December 31, 2013, with one year extensions thereafter as agreed
by the parties. The Company also entered into a line of credit agreement with PCTEL Secure. Under
the term of the line of credit agreement, the Company agreed to lend PCTEL Secure up to $4.0
million at an 8% stated interest rate. The maturity date for this agreement is June 14, 2014.
There were no borrowings under this line of credit during the three months ended March 31, 2011.
Based on review of accounting rules for consolidation, the Company concluded that it (a) has
financial control of PCTEL Secure as it holds two of the three Board seats and (b) Eclipses rights
under the agreements are protective rights that do not override the presumption that the majority
owned subsidiary should be consolidated. Therefore, the Company has consolidated the financial
results of PCTEL Secure into the Companys consolidated financial statements for the three months
ended March 31, 2011.
11
The limited liability company agreement of PCTEL Secure (LLC agreement) provides several
mechanisms for the orderly transition of the Companys ownership from 51% to 100%. The LLC
agreement also includes participation rights that require the Company to pay Eclipse 10% or 5% of
the amount by which the net proceeds exceed the enterprise value if the Company sells PCTEL Secure
before December 31, 2014 or 2015, respectively. The features are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instrument |
|
Notional Amount |
|
Contingency |
|
Period |
PCTEL 1st call right
|
|
19% of membership interests
|
|
None
|
|
1/1/2012 3/31/2012 |
Eclipse put right
|
|
19% of membership interests
|
|
Exercisable if PCTEL does not exercise 1st call right
|
|
4/1/2012 4/10/2012 |
PCTEL 2nd call right
|
|
Remaining Eclipse membership interests
|
|
Purchase all of remaining Eclipse interests
|
|
10/1/2013 12/31/2013 |
Eclipse participation right
|
|
10% of the difference between net
proceeds from sale and enterprise value
|
|
PCTEL exercises 2nd call right and sells subsidiary within 12
months
|
|
ends 12/31/14 |
Eclipse participation right
|
|
5% of the difference between net
proceeds
from sale and enterprise value
|
|
PCTEL exercises 2nd call right and sells subsidiary between
13
and 24 months
|
|
ends 12/31/15 |
PCTEL 3rd call right
|
|
Remaining Eclipse membership interests
|
|
PCTEL does not exercise 2nd call right
|
|
begins 7/1/2014 |
PCTEL 1st call right: the Company has the right to exercise its 1st call right during
the period January 1, 2012 through March 31, 2012, which would require Eclipse to sell to PCTEL 19%
of its interests for a price that represents 19% of the enterprise value (EV) on the exercise
date, with a provision that the minimum price is 19% of $4.9 million.
Eclipse put right: If the Company does not exercise the first call right, then at any time
during the period April 1, 2012 through April 10, 2012, Eclipse can exercise its put right to
require the Company to purchase Eclipses interest in
PCTEL Secure at the price of 19% of $4.9
million.
PCTEL 2nd call right: During the period October 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013, the
Company has the option to issue a notice to Eclipse requiring it to sell to the Company all of its
membership interests in PCTEL Secure at the EV, with a provision that minimum EV is $4.9 million.
Eclipse participation right: If the Company exercises the 2nd call right and subsequently
sells PCTEL Secure within 12 months of exercising the 2nd call right, then Eclipse holds a
participation right that requires the Company to pay to Eclipse 10% of the amount by which the net
proceeds exceed the EV used in the calculation of the price of the 2nd call right. Also, if the
Company exercises the 2nd call right and subsequently sells subsidiary between 13 months and 24
months of exercising the 2nd call right, then Eclipse holds a participation right that requires the
Company to pay to Eclipse 5% of the amount by which the net proceeds exceed the EV used in the
calculation of the Price of the 2nd call right. (Upon exercising the participation right, Eclipse
is entitled to 10% or 5% of non-cash consideration received as proceeds.)
PCTEL 3rd call right: If the 2nd call right is not exercised, and after 6 months, Eclipse
fails to engage a buyer for its membership interests, then the Company has the right to purchase
Eclipses membership interests using the EV calculated at the expiration of the 2nd call right.
The enterprise value is based on a multiple of revenues and backlog. In accordance with accounting
for redeemable financial instruments, the Company determined that the $0.9 million fair value of
this put right is classified as redeemable equity. It is redeemable equity because the price is
fixed for this financial instrument, and the 19% of Eclipses membership interest can be redeemed
at the option of the holder, Eclipse, through the exercise of its put right, or at the option of
the Company, through the exercise of its first call right.
Eclipse
identified an employee of PCTEL Secure and two contractors for Eclipse as key
contributors of services. Eclipse entered into cash bonus arrangement with the three key
contributors. The bonus agreements grant these key contributors the right for each to receive a
cash bonus of 5% of the amount of the net proceeds received by Eclipse upon exercise of Eclipses
exit option, the Companys 2nd call right, or the Companys 3rd call right,
which results in a qualifying sale of Eclipses membership interests in the subsidiary.
Participation in the net proceeds paid to Eclipse from a qualifying sale of Eclipses membership
interests is equivalent to each key contributor having been a 5% owner of the subsidiary.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company recorded $3.1 million of compensation
expense in accordance with accounting for share based payments to nonemployees for the two
contractors of PCTEL Secure and $0.1 million of employee compensation expense in accordance with
accounting for stock compensation for the employee of PCTEL Secure. The Company recognized the
total share-based payment obligation of $3.1 million for the bonus payouts to the contractors on
January 5, 2011 because the quantity and terms of the equity instruments are known upfront for the
share-based payment arrangements between the contractors and Eclipse since each key contributor
receives a specific % of the net proceeds received by Eclipse upon a qualifying sale of its
interests and the amount of proceeds for the qualifying sale are determined based on a
predetermined multiple of revenues and backlog. Further, forfeiture is unlikely because of
sufficiently large disincentives for nonperformance. The Company recorded $0.1 million of employee
compensation expense for the share based payment obligation for the employee of PCTEL Secure, which
is the pro-rata portion of the total expense to be recognized over the requisite service period of
three years. The fair value of the bonus amounts was based on the projected enterprise value as of
December 31, 2013. Subsequent changes in the fair value for the awards will be recognized in
earnings each reporting period. Since the Company is a noncontributing investor to the share-based
payment arrangements, the Company recognized income of $1.6 million, equal to the amount that
12
its interest in the subsidiarys equity increased as a result of the disproportionate funding of the compensation costs.
This amount is included in other income, net in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the
three months ended March 31, 2011.
PCTEL Secure incurred a total loss of $3.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011.
Since the allocation of PCTEL Secures profits and losses is based on its prorated share of unit
ownership, the Company recorded $1.8 million as net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest.
See the segment information in note 13 for information related to the financial results of PCTEL
Secure. The noncontrolling equity on the balance sheet reflects Eclipses share of the equity of
PCTEL Secure. The noncontrolling equity includes permanent equity of $2.4 million and redeemable
equity of $0.9 million. See note 15 related to equity for the reconciliation of these
noncontrolling interest amounts.
5. Acquisitions
Acquisition of Sparco Technologies, Inc.
On January 12, 2010, the Company acquired all of the outstanding share capital of Sparco pursuant
to a Share Purchase Agreement among the Company, Sparco, and David R. Dulling, Valerie Dulling,
Chris Cooke, and Glenn Buckner, the holders of the outstanding share capital of Sparco. Sparco is
a San Antonio, Texas based company that specializes in selling value-added wireless local area
network (WLAN) products and services to the enterprise, education, hospitality, and healthcare
markets. Sparcos product line includes antennas for WLAN, national electrical manufacturers
association (NEMA) enclosures and mounting accessories, site survey tools, and amplifiers. With
this acquisition, the Company extended its product offering, channel penetration and technology
base in wireless enterprise products.
The Company assumed a lease for a 6,300 square foot facility used for operations and sales
activities in San Antonio, Texas that expired in January 2011. The Company integrated Sparcos
manufacturing and distribution operations in its Bloomingdale, Illinois facility in the third
quarter 2010 and moved the sales offices to a new location in San Antonio, Texas in January 2011.
The consideration for Sparco was $2.5 million, consisting of $2.4 million in cash consideration and
$0.1 million related to the Companys outstanding receivable balance from Sparco at the date of
acquisition. Of the $2.4 million cash consideration, $2.1 million was payable to the Sparco
shareholders and $0.3 million was used to discharge outstanding debt liabilities. At March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010, approximately $0.2 million remains outstanding, consisting of the final
payment due related to shareholders or to third parties. The $0.2 million due is included in
accrued liabilities. The cash consideration paid in connection with the acquisition was provided
from the Companys existing cash. The acquisition related costs for the Sparco purchase were not
significant to the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
The consideration was allocated based on fair value: $1.1 million to net tangible liabilities, $3.3
million to customer relationships, $0.3 million to trade names and other intangible assets. The
fair value of the net assets acquired exceeded the total investment by $54. This $54 gain on the
bargain purchase of Sparco was recorded in other income, net in the condensed consolidated
statements of operations. There was no goodwill recorded with this transaction. The consideration
was determined based on the fair value of the intangible assets modeled at the time of the
negotiation, which were updated at the time of closing. An immaterial bargain purchase amount
resulted from the process of validating the Companys initial fair value model assumptions with
actual performance information from the first quarter of operations. The intangible assets are
being amortized for book purposes, but are not deductible for tax purposes. The weighted average
amortization period of the intangible assets acquired is 5.3 years. The Company estimated the fair
value (and remaining useful lives) of the assets and liabilities.
13
The following is the allocation of the purchase price for Sparco at the date of the acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
91 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
269 |
|
Prepaids and other assets |
|
|
5 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
205 |
|
Fixed assets |
|
|
10 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
3,350 |
|
Trade names |
|
|
268 |
|
Backlog |
|
|
12 |
|
Non-compete |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
|
3,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
4,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
326 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long term liabilities |
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
2,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of assets from Ascom Network Testing, Inc.
On December 30, 2009, the Company entered into and closed an Asset Purchase Agreement (the Ascom
APA) with Ascom. Under the terms of the Ascom APA, the Company acquired all of the assets related
to Ascoms scanning receiver business (WTS scanning receivers). The WTS scanners receiver
business was a small part of Comarcos WTS segment, a business that Ascom acquired in 2009. The
WTS scanning receivers augment the Companys scanning receiver product line.
The WTS scanning receiver business has been integrated with the Companys scanning receiver
operations in Germantown, Maryland. As part of the Ascom APA, the parties concurrently entered
into a Transition Services Agreement (TSA). Under the TSA, Ascom manufactured and assembled the
scanner products until the operations were integrated with the Companys own operations in its
Germantown, Maryland facility. The TSA was complete as of June 30, 2010. Per the Ascom APA, the
Company also funded the development of compatibility between its scanning receivers and Ascoms
benchmarking solution.
Separately, the Company and Ascom renewed their existing supply agreement, which remained
non-exclusive. Under the supply agreement, the Company continues to supply both the PCTEL scanning
receivers and the WTS scanning receivers to the newly formed Ascom Network Testing Division that
consolidated the testing businesses for mobile telecom carriers of Ascom.
The purchase price of $4.5 million for the scanning receiver assets of Ascom was allocated based on
fair value: $0.3 million to net tangible assets, $3.8 million to customer relationships, $0.3
million to core technology and trade names, and $0.1 million to other intangible assets. The
technology includes $0.2 million of in-process R&D related to LTE scanner development. The
projects related to the in-process research and development were completed in the third quarter of
2010. The tangible assets include inventory and warranty obligations. There was no goodwill
recorded from this acquisition. The intangible assets are being amortized for book purposes and
are tax deductible. At the date of the acquisition, the weighted average book amortization period
of the intangible assets was 5.2 years. The Company estimated the fair value (and remaining useful
lives) of the assets and liabilities.
14
The following is the allocation of the purchase price for Ascom at the date of the acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
$ |
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
Core technology |
|
|
254 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
3,833 |
|
Trade name |
|
|
52 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
|
4,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
Warranty accrual |
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
4,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
The purchase price was based on $4.3 million paid at the close of the transaction and $0.2
million of contingent consideration due in two equal installments in December 2010 and 2011,
respectively. The cash consideration paid in connection with the acquisition was provided from the
Companys existing cash. The $0.2 million of contingent consideration was based upon achievement
of certain revenue objectives and at December 31, 2009, the Company included the future payments
due in the purchase price because it believed that the achievement of these objectives was more
likely than not. The revenue target for 2010 was not met, and as of December 31, 2010, the Company
determined that the revenue target for 2011 would more than likely not be met. At December 31,
2010, the Company recorded a write off of the $0.2 million contingent consideration as
miscellaneous income. Due to the revised revenue projections for the WTS scanning receivers, the
Company also recorded impairment expense of $0.2 million. See the intangible asset section of note
1 for further discussion of the intangible asset impairment for Ascom.
6. Settlement with Wider Networks LLC
On December 9, 2009, the Company settled its intellectual property dispute with Wider. The
settlement agreement provided for a purchase of assets in the form of patented technology, trade
names and trademarks, and exclusive distribution rights. The settlement gives the Company another
interference management product, suitable for certain markets, to distribute along side CLARIFY®.
The $1.2 million settlement amount consisted of cash consideration of $0.8 million paid at the
close of the transaction plus additional installments of $0.2 million in December 2010 and December
2011.
The fair value of the elements in the settlement agreement was approximately $1.2 million. The
$1.2 million fair value of the assets purchased from Wider was allocated: $1.0 million to
distribution rights and $0.2 million to core technology and trade names.
The following was recorded as the fair value of the asset acquired from Wider at the date of the
settlement:
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
Distribution rights, net |
|
$ |
1,013 |
|
Core technology |
|
|
127 |
|
Trade name |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
$ |
1,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company estimated the fair value (and remaining useful lives) of the assets. At the date the
settlement was recorded, the weighted average book amortization period of the intangible assets was
5.7 years. The 2010 revenues resulting from the products related to the Wider trade name and the
Wider distribution rights were significantly lower than the Companys revenue projections used in
the original accounting valuations. The Company considered these revenue variances as an
indication that the carrying value of the long lived intangible assets
15
subject to amortization may not be fully recoverable and may be less than the fair value at
December 31, 2010. At December 31, 2010, the Company recorded impairment expense of $0.9 million
related to the remaining balance of the distribution rights and trade names. The intangible assets
were amortized for book purposes in 2010. The core technology will be amortized for book purposes
for the remainder of its useful life. The intangible assets are tax-deductible. See the
intangible asset section of note 1 for further discussion of the intangible asset impairment for
Wider.
The Company paid the first installment of $0.2 million in December 2010. The fair value of the
$0.2 million payment due in December 2011 is included in accrued liabilities at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010.
7. Earnings per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Basic Earnings Per Share computation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
($1,900 |
) |
|
|
($795 |
) |
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(1,781 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to PCTEL, Inc . |
|
|
($119 |
) |
|
|
($795 |
) |
Less: adjustments to redemption value of noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(1,166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common shareholders |
|
|
($1,285 |
) |
|
|
($795 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding |
|
|
17,199 |
|
|
|
17,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common shareholders |
|
|
($0.07 |
) |
|
|
($0.05 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share computation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
($1,900 |
) |
|
|
($795 |
) |
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
($1,781 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to PCTEL, Inc . |
|
|
($119 |
) |
|
|
($795 |
) |
Less: adjustments to redemption value of noncontrolling interests |
|
|
($1,166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to commons shareholders |
|
|
($1,285 |
) |
|
|
($795 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding |
|
|
17,199 |
|
|
|
17,487 |
|
Restricted shares subject to vesting |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Common stock option grants |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares |
|
|
17,199 |
|
|
|
17,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common shareholders |
|
|
($0.07 |
) |
|
|
($0.05 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
As denoted by * in the table above, the weighted average common stock option grants and
restricted shares of 474,000 and 469,000 were excluded from the calculations of diluted net loss
per share for the periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, since their effects are
anti-dilutive. |
16
8. Stock-Based Compensation
The condensed consolidated statements of operations include $0.8 million and $1.0 million of
stock compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Stock
compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 consists of $0.6 million of
restricted stock amortization, $0.1 million for performance share amortization, $0.1 million for
stock option expenses and stock purchase plan expenses. Stock compensation expense for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 consists of $0.7 million of restricted stock amortization, $0.1 million
for performance share amortization, $0.1 million for stock option expenses and stock purchase plan
expenses, and $0.1 million for stock bonuses. The Company did not capitalize any stock
compensation expense during the three months ended March 31, 2011 or 2010, respectively.
The Company did not issue any stock awards to employees or contributors of PCTEL Secure during the three months ended March 31, 2011.
Total stock-based compensation is reflected in the condensed consolidated statements of operations
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
91 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
821 |
|
|
$ |
952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Serviced Based
The Company grants restricted shares as employee incentives as permitted under the Companys 1997
Stock Plan, as amended and restated (1997 Stock Plan). In connection with the grant of
restricted stock to employees, the Company records deferred stock compensation representing the
fair value of the common stock on the date the restricted stock is granted. Stock compensation
expense is recorded ratably over the vesting period of the applicable shares. These grants vest
over various periods, but typically vest over four years.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company issued 154,750 shares of restricted stock
with grant date fair value of $1.1 million and recorded cancellations of 5,325 shares with grant
date fair value of $29. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company also converted
102,941 performance units with a grant date fair value of $0.6 million to time-based restricted
stock. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company issued 684,650 shares of restricted
stock with grant date fair value of $4.2 million and recorded cancellations of 18,600 shares with
grant date fair value of $0.1 million.
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, 381,696 restricted shares vested with grant date fair
value of $2.4 million and intrinsic value of $2.8 million. For the three months ended March 31,
2010, 325,925 restricted shares vested with grant date fair value of $2.1 million and intrinsic
value of $1.9 million. At March 31, 2011, total unrecognized compensation expense related to
restricted stock was approximately $5.2 million, net of forfeitures to be recognized through 2016
over a weighted average period of 2.1 years.
17
The following table summarizes restricted stock activity for the three months ended March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested Restricted Stock Awards December 31, 2010 |
|
|
1,274,316 |
|
|
$ |
5.93 |
|
Shares awarded |
|
|
154,750 |
|
|
|
7.21 |
|
Performance share units converted to restricted stock awards |
|
|
102,941 |
|
|
|
6.21 |
|
Shares vested |
|
|
(381,696 |
) |
|
|
6.36 |
|
Shares cancelled |
|
|
(5,325 |
) |
|
|
5.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested Restricted Stock Awards March 31, 2011 |
|
|
1,144,986 |
|
|
$ |
5.89 |
|
Stock Options
The Company may grant stock options to purchase the common stock. The Company issues stock options
with exercise prices no less than the fair value of the Companys stock on the grant date.
Employee options contain gradual vesting provisions, whereby 25% vest one year from the date of
grant and thereafter in monthly increments over the remaining three years. The Board of Director
options vest on the first anniversary of the grant year. Stock options may be exercised at any
time prior to their expiration date or within ninety days of termination of employment, or such
shorter time as may be provided in the related stock option agreement. Historically, the Company
has granted stock options with a ten year life. Beginning with options granted in July 2010, the
Company granted stock options with a seven year life. During 2010 and 2011, the Company awarded
stock options to eligible new employees for incentive purposes.
The fair value of each unvested option was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option valuation model. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in
estimating the fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully
transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective
assumptions including the expected stock price volatility and expected option life. Because the
Companys employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded
options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair
value estimate, the existing models may not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the
fair value of the employee stock options.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011 the Company issued 3,800 stock options with a weighted
average grant date value of $3.15. The Company received proceeds of $18 from the exercise of 2,500
options. The intrinsic value of these options exercised was $1. During the three months ended
March 31, 2010 there were no stock option exercises. During the three months ended March 31, 2011,
no options were forfeited and 69,200 options expired. During the three months ended March 31,
2010, 8,310 options were forfeited and 18,584 options expired. As of March 31, 2011, the
unrecognized compensation expense related to the unvested portion of the Companys stock options
was approximately $0.1 million, net of estimated forfeitures to be recognized through 2015 over a
weighted average period of 1.6 years
18
The range of exercise prices for options outstanding and exercisable at March 31, 2011 was $5.50 to
$12.16. The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding under all stock
plans at March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Range of |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Contractual Life |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Average |
|
Exercise Prices |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
(Years) |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
$ |
5.50 |
|
|
$ |
7.20 |
|
|
|
223,223 |
|
|
|
4.26 |
|
|
$ |
6.84 |
|
|
|
191,619 |
|
|
$ |
6.94 |
|
|
7.21 |
|
|
|
7.93 |
|
|
|
197,646 |
|
|
|
3.11 |
|
|
|
7.68 |
|
|
|
192,784 |
|
|
|
7.68 |
|
|
7.95 |
|
|
|
8.48 |
|
|
|
161,647 |
|
|
|
1.62 |
|
|
|
8.07 |
|
|
|
161,647 |
|
|
|
8.07 |
|
|
8.49 |
|
|
|
9.09 |
|
|
|
228,600 |
|
|
|
4.53 |
|
|
|
8.86 |
|
|
|
227,164 |
|
|
|
8.86 |
|
|
9.11 |
|
|
|
9.19 |
|
|
|
156,627 |
|
|
|
5.33 |
|
|
|
9.16 |
|
|
|
156,252 |
|
|
|
9.16 |
|
|
9.30 |
|
|
|
10.25 |
|
|
|
152,900 |
|
|
|
4.29 |
|
|
|
9.75 |
|
|
|
148,065 |
|
|
|
9.76 |
|
|
10.46 |
|
|
|
10.75 |
|
|
|
187,720 |
|
|
|
3.17 |
|
|
|
10.69 |
|
|
|
187,253 |
|
|
|
10.69 |
|
|
10.80 |
|
|
|
11.55 |
|
|
|
157,050 |
|
|
|
3.16 |
|
|
|
11.25 |
|
|
|
157,050 |
|
|
|
11.25 |
|
|
11.68 |
|
|
|
11.84 |
|
|
|
57,000 |
|
|
|
2.86 |
|
|
|
11.81 |
|
|
|
57,000 |
|
|
|
11.81 |
|
|
12.16 |
|
|
|
12.16 |
|
|
|
6,400 |
|
|
|
3.05 |
|
|
|
12.16 |
|
|
|
6,400 |
|
|
|
12.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5.50 |
|
|
$ |
12.16 |
|
|
|
1,528,813 |
|
|
|
3.68 |
|
|
$ |
9.04 |
|
|
|
1,485,234 |
|
|
$ |
9.11 |
|
The intrinsic value and contractual life of the options outstanding and exercisable at March
31, 2011 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
Contractual |
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Life (years) |
|
Value |
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
3.68 |
|
|
$ |
208 |
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
3.58 |
|
|
$ |
160 |
|
The intrinsic value is based on the share price of $7.67 at March 31, 2011.
The following table summarizes the stock option activity for the three months ended March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
1,596,713 |
|
|
$ |
9.04 |
|
Granted |
|
|
3,800 |
|
|
|
7.28 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(2,500 |
) |
|
|
7.30 |
|
Expired or Cancelled |
|
|
(69,200 |
) |
|
|
9.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
1,528,813 |
|
|
$ |
9.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
1,485,234 |
|
|
$ |
9.11 |
|
Performance Units
The Company grants performance units to certain executive officers. Shares are earned upon
achievement of defined performance goals such as revenue and earnings. Certain performance units
granted are subject to a service period before vesting. The fair value of the performance units
issued is based on the Companys stock price on the date the performance units are granted. The
Company records expense for the performance units based on estimated achievement of the performance
goals.
19
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company granted 139,691 performance units with a
grant date fair value of $1.0 million and cancelled 35,083 performance units with a grant date fair
value of $0.4 million. In the first quarter of 2011, 30,037 performance shares vested with a grant
date fair value of $290 and intrinsic value of $225. During the three months ended March 31, 2011,
102,941 performance units were converted to time-based restricted stock awards.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company granted 85,000 performance units with a
grant date fair value of $0.5 million. In the first quarter of 2010, the Company did not record
any cancellations of performance units and no performance shares vested.
As of March 31, 2011, the unrecognized compensation expense related to the unvested portion of the
Companys performance units was approximately $0.8 million, to be recognized through 2014 over a
weighted average period of 2.3 years.
The following table summarizes the performance share activity during the three months ended March
31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested Performance Units December 31, 2010 |
|
|
161,276 |
|
|
$ |
7.79 |
|
Units awarded |
|
|
139,691 |
|
|
|
7.51 |
|
Units vested |
|
|
(30,037 |
) |
|
|
9.67 |
|
Performance share units converted to restricted stock awards |
|
|
(102,941 |
) |
|
|
6.21 |
|
Units cancelled |
|
|
(35,083 |
) |
|
|
10.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested Performance Units March 31, 2011 |
|
|
132,906 |
|
|
$ |
6.48 |
|
Restricted Stock Units
The Company grants restricted stock units as employee incentives as permitted under the Companys
1997 Stock Plan. Employee restricted stock units are time-based awards and are amortized over the
vesting period. At the vesting date, these units are converted to shares of common stock. These
units vest over various periods, but typically vest over four years. The fair value of the
restricted stock units issued is based on the Companys stock price on the date the restricted
stock units are granted.
The Company issued 4,400 time-based restricted stock units with a fair value of $31 to employees
during the three months ended March 31, 2011. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, 1,500
restricted stock units vested with a grant date fair value of $9 and intrinsic value of $11. The
Company issued 6,000 time-based restricted stock units with a fair value of $37 to employees during
the three months ended March 31, 2010. As of March 31, 2011, the unrecognized compensation expense
related to the unvested portion of the Companys restricted stock units was approximately $58, to
be recognized through 2015 over a weighted average period of 2.4 years.
The following table summarizes the restricted stock unit activity during the three months
ended March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested Restricted Stock Units December 31, 2010 |
|
|
7,875 |
|
|
$ |
6.13 |
|
Units awarded |
|
|
4,400 |
|
|
|
7.21 |
|
Units vested |
|
|
(1,500 |
) |
|
|
6.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested Restricted Stock Units March 31, 2011 |
|
|
10,775 |
|
|
$ |
6.26 |
|
20
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP)
The ESPP enables eligible employees to purchase common stock at the lower of 85% of the fair market
value of the common stock on the first or last day of each offering period. Each offering period
is six months. The Company received proceeds of $0.3 million from the issuance of 54,751 shares
under the ESPP in February 2011 and received proceeds of $0.2 million from the issuance of 44,360
shares under the ESPP in February 2010.
Based on the 15% discount and the fair value of the option feature of this plan, this plan is
considered compensatory. Compensation expense is calculated using the fair value of the employees
purchase rights under the Black-Scholes model.
The Company calculated the fair value of each employee stock purchase grant on the date of grant
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Dividend yield |
|
None |
|
None |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
49 |
% |
Expected life (in years) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
The risk-free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury yields with remaining term that
approximates the expected life of the shares granted. The Company uses a dividend yield of None
in the valuation model for shares related to the Purchase Plan. The Company has paid only one cash
dividend in its history which was paid in May 2008. The Company does not anticipate the payment of
regular dividends in the future. The Company calculates the volatility based on a five-year
historical period of the Companys stock price. The expected life used is based on the length of
the offering period.
Short Term Bonus Incentive Plan (STIP)
Bonuses related to the Companys 2010 Short Term Incentive Plan (STIP) were paid in the Companys
common stock to executives and in cash to non-executives. The shares earned under the plan were
issued in the first quarter following the end of the fiscal year. In March 2011, the Company
issued 48,345 shares, net of shares withheld for payment of withholding tax under the 2010 STIP.
In March 2010, the Company issued 1,952 shares, net of shares withheld for payment of withholding
tax under the 2009 STIP, and in October 2010, under a severance agreement, issued another 6,339
shares, net of shares withheld for payment of withholding tax, under the 2010 STIP. For the 2011
STIP, executive and non-executive bonuses earned will be paid 100% in cash.
Employee Withholding Taxes on Stock Awards
For ease in administering the issuance of stock awards, the Company holds back shares of vested
restricted stock awards and short-term incentive plan stock awards for the value of the statutory
withholding taxes. The Company paid $1.2 million and $0.7 million for withholding taxes related to
stock awards during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Stock Repurchases
The Company repurchases shares of common stock under share repurchase programs authorized by the
Board of Directors. All share repurchase programs are announced publicly. On November 21, 2008,
the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of shares up to a value of $5.0 million. There
were no share repurchases during the first quarter of 2011 or the first quarter of 2010 under this
share repurchase program. At March 31, 2011, the Company had $2.6 million remaining to be
purchased under this program.
9. Comprehensive Income
The following table provides the calculation of other comprehensive income for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
($119 |
) |
|
|
($795 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
($106 |
) |
|
|
($806 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
10. Restructuring
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company paid $0.1 million for restructuring
liabilities related to its 2010 functional reorganization. The Company did not incur any
restructuring expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2011 or 2010.
The following table summarizes the restructuring activity during the three months ended March 31,
2011 and the status of the reserves at March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
324 |
|
Restructuring expense |
|
|
|
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
|
|
|
11. Commitments and Contingencies
Leases
The Company has operating leases for office facilities through 2016 and office equipment through
2014. The future minimum rental payments under these leases at March 31, 2011, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Amount |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
528 |
|
2012 |
|
|
724 |
|
2013 |
|
|
222 |
|
2014 |
|
|
97 |
|
2015 |
|
|
88 |
|
2016 |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
Future minumum lease payments |
|
$ |
1,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company does not have any capital leases.
Warranty Reserve and Sales Returns
The Company allows its major distributors and certain other customers to return unused product
under specified terms and conditions. The Company accrues for product returns based on historical
sales and return trends. The Companys allowance for sales returns was $0.2 million at March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
The Company offers repair and replacement warranties of primarily two years for antenna products
and one year for scanners and receivers. The Companys warranty reserve is based on historical
sales and costs of repair and replacement trends. The warranty reserve was $0.2 million and $0.3
million at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, and is included in other accrued
liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
22
Changes in the warranty reserves during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
257 |
|
|
$ |
228 |
|
Provisions for warranty |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Consumption of reserves |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
173 |
|
|
$ |
213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. Income Taxes
The Company recorded an income tax benefit of $0.3 million in the three months ended March 31,
2011. This tax benefit for the three months ended March 31, 2011 differs from the statutory rate
of 35% by approximately 21% primarily because of permanent tax differences.
The Company recorded an income tax benefit of $0.5 million in the three months ended March 31,
2010. This tax benefit for the three months ended March 31, 2010 differs from the statutory rate
of 35% by approximately 3% because of permanent tax differences and state and foreign taxes.
The Companys valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets was $0.7 million at March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010. On a regular basis, management evaluates the recoverability of
deferred tax assets and the need for a valuation allowance. Such evaluations involve the
application of significant judgment. Management considers multiple factors in its evaluation of the
need for a valuation allowance. The Company has incurred a cumulative taxable loss from continuing
operations exclusive of reversing temporary differences over the three years ended December 31,
2010. However, this period includes the affect of a worldwide economic recession, which in the
Companys judgment is an unusual event. The Companys deferred tax assets have a ratable reversal
pattern over 15 years. The carryforward rules allow for up to a 20 year carry forward of net
operating losses (NOL) to future income that is available to realize the deferred tax assets.
And, the Companys estimate of future income over the reversal period and subsequent carry forward
period is sufficient to realize the deferred tax assets. Based on the evaluation of these factors
taken as a whole, the Company believes that the positive evidence in the form of the ratable 15
year reversal pattern, 20 year NOL carryforward period, and its estimate of future income, outweigh
the negative evidence of a cumulative taxable loss from continuing operations exclusive of
reversing temporary differences over the last three years, which includes a worldwide recession.
Therefore, the Company believes that the net deferred tax asset exclusive of the credits and state
net operating losses is more likely than not to be realized.
The Companys gross unrecognized tax benefit was $1.2 million both at March 31, 2011 and December
31, 2010.
The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return, income tax returns with various states,
and foreign income tax returns in various foreign jurisdictions. The Companys federal and state
income tax years, with limited exceptions, are closed through 2007. The Company does not believe
that any of its tax positions will significantly change within the next twelve months.
PCTEL Secure is a pass-through entity for income tax purposes.
The Company will recognize its share of PCTEL Secures taxable income or loss based on its ownership interest.
The Company classifies interest and penalties associated with the uncertain tax positions as a
component of income tax expense. There was no interest or penalties related to income taxes
recorded in the condensed consolidated financial statements.
13. Segment, Customer and Geographic Information
In 2010, the Company operated in one segment for reporting purposes. Beginning with the
formation of PCTEL Secure in January 2011, the Company reports the financial results of PCTEL
Secure as a separate operating segment. Because PCTEL Secure is a
joint venture, the Company makes decisions regarding allocation of
resources separate from the rest of the Company. The Companys chief operating decision maker (CODM) uses
the profit and loss results and the assets in deciding how to allocate resources and assess
performance between the segments.
23
The results of operations by segment are as follows for the three months ended March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
PCTEL |
|
|
PCTEL Secure |
|
|
consolidating |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES |
|
$ |
18,233 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
18,233 |
|
COST OF REVENUES |
|
|
10,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS PROFIT |
|
|
8,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
2,707 |
|
|
|
3,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,156 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
2,565 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,608 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
2,695 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,718 |
|
Amortization of other intangible assets |
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
8,528 |
|
|
|
3,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING LOSS |
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
(3,626 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,933 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
1,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
|
1,422 |
|
|
|
(3,626 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,204 |
) |
Benefit for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(304 |
) |
|
|
(304 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS |
|
|
1,422 |
|
|
|
(3,626 |
) |
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
(1,900 |
) |
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,781 |
) |
|
|
(1,781 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO PCTEL, INC. |
|
$ |
1,422 |
|
|
|
($3,626 |
) |
|
$ |
2,085 |
|
|
|
($119 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
|
ASSETS |
|
$ |
128,272 |
|
|
$ |
4,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
132,840 |
|
The Companys revenues to customers outside of the United States, as a percent of total
revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
Region |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Europe, Middle East, & Africa |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
27 |
% |
Asia Pacific |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
Other Americas |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Foreign sales |
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no customers representing 10% or more of revenues in the three months ended March
31, 2011 or 2010.
14. Benefit Plans
Employee Benefit Plans
The Companys 401(k) plan covers all of the U.S. employees beginning the first of the month
following the month they begin their employment. Under this plan, employees may elect to
contribute up to 15% of their current compensation to the 401(k) plan, up to the statutorily
prescribed annual limit. The Company may make discretionary contributions to the 401(k) plan. The
Company made employer contributions of $151 and $133 to the 401(k) plan for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company also contributes to various retirement plans
for foreign employees. The Company made contributions to these plans of $41 and $17 for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan
The Company provides an Executive Deferred Compensation Plan for executive officers and senior
managers. Under this plan, the executives may defer up to 50% of salary and 100% of cash bonuses.
In addition, the Company provides a 4% matching cash contribution which vests over three years
subject to the executives continued service. The executive has a choice of investment
alternatives from a menu of mutual funds. The plan is administered by the Compensation Committee
and an outside party tracks investments and provides the
24
executives with quarterly statements showing relevant contribution and investment data. Upon
termination of employment, death, disability or retirement, the executive will receive the value of
his or her account in accordance with the provisions of the plan. Upon retirement, the executive
may request to receive either a lump sum payment, or payments in annual installments over 15 years
or over the lifetime of the participant with 20 annual payments guaranteed. The deferred
compensation obligation included in Long-Term Liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance
sheets was $1.3 million at March 31, 2011 and $1.2 million at December 31, 2010. The Company funds
the obligation related to the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan with corporate-owned life
insurance policies. The cash surrender value of such policies is included in Other Non-Current
Assets.
15. Equity
The following table is a
summary of equity for the three months ended March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
Attributable |
|
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
to PCTEL |
|
|
Permanent |
|
|
Temporary |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
116,655 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
(1,090 |
) |
|
|
(691 |
) |
|
|
(1,781 |
) |
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
(1,090 |
) |
|
|
(691 |
) |
|
|
(1,781 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation, net |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initital capitalization for PCTEL
Secure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,944 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
Share-based payments for PCTEL
Secure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,584 |
|
Adjustment to redemption value of
noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(1,166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
(1,378 |
) |
|
|
2,438 |
|
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
3,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
$ |
115,277 |
|
|
$ |
2,438 |
|
|
$ |
931 |
|
|
$ |
3,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest in the condensed consolidated financial statements consist of Eclipses
49% interest in PCTEL Secure. The $2.4 million represents 49% of the initial capitalization of the
subsidiary. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company recognized compensation
costs of $3.2 million for three key contributors and 49% of the expense associated with these
awards is credited to Eclipses noncontrolling interest. Since the redeemable equity is fixed at
$0.9 million, the Company recorded a $1.1 million adjustment to retained earnings.
25
The following table is a summary of the activity in stockholders equity of the Company during the
three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Number of common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
18,286 |
|
|
|
18,494 |
|
Stock-based compensation, net of taxes |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
18,534 |
|
|
|
19,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
Stock-based compensation, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
137,154 |
|
|
$ |
138,141 |
|
Stock-based compensation, net of taxes |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
512 |
|
Tax Effect from stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
137,048 |
|
|
$ |
138,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
($20,578 |
) |
|
|
($17,122 |
) |
Adjustment related to temporary equity |
|
|
($1,166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to PCTEL, Inc. |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
(795 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
($21,863 |
) |
|
|
($17,917 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
Foreign translation |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity of PCTEL, Inc. |
|
$ |
115,277 |
|
|
$ |
120,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
Item 2: Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following information should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial
statements and the notes thereto included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010
contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 16, 2011. Except for historical
information, the following discussion contains forward looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties, including statements regarding our anticipated revenues, profits, costs and expenses
and revenue mix. These forward-looking statements include, among others, those statements
including the words may, will, plans, seeks, expects, anticipates, intends,
believes and words of similar importance. Such statements constitute forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You should
not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Our actual results could differ
materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.
Introduction
PCTEL is a global leader in propagation and optimization solutions for the wireless industry. We
design and develop software-based radios (scanning receivers) for wireless network optimization and
develop and distribute innovative antenna solutions. Additionally, we have licensed our
intellectual property, principally related to a discontinued modem business, to semiconductor, PC
manufacturers, modem suppliers, and others.
Revenue growth for antenna products is driven by emerging wireless applications in the following
markets: public safety, military, and government applications; SCADA, health care, energy, smart
grid and agricultural applications; indoor wireless, wireless backhaul, and cellular applications.
Revenue growth for scanning receiver and interference management products is driven by the
deployment of new wireless technology and the need for wireless networks to be tuned and
reconfigured on a regular basis.
We have an intellectual property portfolio related to antennas, the mounting of antennas, and
scanning receivers. These patents are being held for defensive purposes and are not part of an
active licensing program.
On January 5, 2011, we formed PCTEL Secure LLC (PCTEL Secure), a joint venture limited liability
company with Eclipse Design Technologies, Inc (Eclipse). PCTEL Secure designs Android-based,
secure communication products. We contributed $2.5 million in cash in return for 51% ownership of
the joint venture and Eclipse contributed $2.4 million of intangible assets in return for 49%
ownership of the joint venture.
In 2010, we operated in one segment for reporting purposes. Beginning with the formation of PCTEL
Secure in January 2011, we report the financial results of PCTEL Secure as a separate operating
segment. The Companys chief operating decision maker (CODM) uses the profit and loss results
and the assets in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance between the segments.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010
(in thousands)
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
18,233 |
|
|
$ |
15,573 |
|
Percent change from year ago period |
|
|
17.1 |
% |
|
|
10.1 |
% |
Revenues increased 17.1% in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the same period in
2010. In the three months ended March 31, 2011 versus the comparable period in the prior year,
approximately 14% of the increase is attributable to antennas, and approximately 3% of the increase
is attributable to scanning receivers. Antenna revenues increased due to stronger volume in our
targeted vertical markets. Antenna sales improved to both our large distributors and to OEM
equipment providers. Higher scanning receiver revenues were due to increased sales through our
value added resellers.
27
Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
8,221 |
|
|
$ |
7,219 |
|
Percentage of revenue |
|
|
45.1 |
% |
|
|
46.4 |
% |
Percent of revenue change from year ago period |
|
|
(1.3 |
%) |
|
|
(0.8 |
%) |
The gross profit percentage of 45.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was 1.3% lower
than the comparable period in fiscal 2010. Compared to the same period last year, the gross margin
percentage improved in antenna products but declined in scanning receiver products, as the newly
introduced MX product line has a slightly higher cost profile than our other scanning receiver
products. The net result of the margin percentage changes as well as antenna products continuing
to comprise a higher percent of our revenue resulted in the lower gross margin percentage. Net
lower product margins contributed 0.8% of the gross margin percentage decline and product mix
contributed 0.5% of the gross margin percentage decline.
Research and Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
6,156 |
|
|
$ |
3,085 |
|
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
33.8 |
% |
|
|
19.8 |
% |
Percent change from year ago period |
|
|
99.5 |
% |
|
|
14.8 |
% |
Research and development expenses increased approximately $3.1 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 compared to the comparable period in 2010. We incurred $3.5 million of
expense related to PCTEL Secure, but research and development expenses other than for PCTEL Secure
declined by $0.4 million primarily due to the completion of several projects in scanning receiver
development. The increase related to PCTEL Secure includes $3.2 million of share based payments
for key contributors. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we recorded $3.1 million of
compensation expense for the two contractors of Eclipse and $0.1 million of compensation expense
for the employee of Eclipse. Because the quantity and terms of the equity instruments are known
upfront for the share-based payment arrangements between the contractors and Eclipse, the Company
recognized the total share-based payment obligation to the contractors of $3.1 million on January
5, 2011.
Sales and Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
$ |
2,608 |
|
|
$ |
2,259 |
|
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
|
14.5 |
% |
Percent change from year ago period |
|
|
15.4 |
% |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
Sales and marketing expenses include costs associated with the sales and marketing employees,
sales representatives, product line management, and trade show expenses.
Sales and marketing expenses increased approximately $0.3 million for the three months ended March
31, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010 due to our investment in antenna vertical markets,
sales and marketing expenses for PCTEL Secure, and due to higher sales employee commissions related
to the increased revenues.
General and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
$ |
2,718 |
|
|
$ |
2,552 |
|
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
14.9 |
% |
|
|
16.4 |
% |
Percent change from year ago period |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
28
General and administrative expenses include costs associated with the general management,
finance, human resources, information technology, legal, insurance, public company costs, and other
operating expenses to the extent not otherwise allocated to other functions.
General and administrative expenses increased approximately $0.2 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 compared to the same period in fiscal 2010 primarily due to expenses related to the
implementation of our new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system. The project for the ERP
system is expected to be completed in the third quarter of 2011.
Amortization of Other Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of other intangible assets |
|
$ |
672 |
|
|
$ |
763 |
|
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
Amortization expense decreased approximately $0.1 million in the three months ended March 31,
2011 compared to the same period in 2010 Amortization expense declined $0.2 million because
intangible assets acquired from Andrew Corporation were fully amortized in 2010 and due to the fact
that certain intangible assets related to the Wider settlement and the acquisition of products from
Ascom were impaired during the fourth quarter 2010. These decreases in amortization were partially
offset by additional amortization of $0.1 million related to the intangible assets contributed by
Eclipse for PCTEL Secure.
Other Income, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net |
|
$ |
1,729 |
|
|
$ |
159 |
|
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
Other income, net consists of interest income, foreign exchange gains and losses, and
investment income. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, other income includes $1.6 million
of income related to share based payments for key contributors of PCTEL Secure. Since we are a
noncontributing investor to the share-based payment arrangements, the Company recognized income of
$1.6 million, equal to the amount that its interest in the subsidiarys equity increased as a
result of the disproportionate funding of the share-based compensation costs. Other income, net
includes foreign exchange losses of $8 and $14 in the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively.
Benefit for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit for income taxes |
|
$ |
304 |
|
|
$ |
486 |
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
13.8 |
% |
|
|
37.9 |
% |
The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2011 differed from the statutory
rate of 35% by approximately 21% because of permanent differences.
The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2010 differed from the statutory rate
of 35% by approximately 3% because of permanent differences and foreign and state taxes.
We maintain valuation allowances due to uncertainties regarding realizability. At March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010, we had a $0.7 million valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets. The
valuation allowance relates to deferred tax assets in tax jurisdictions in which we no longer have
significant operations. On a regular basis, management evaluates the recoverability of deferred
tax assets and the need for a valuation allowance. At such time as it is determined that it is
more likely than not that the deferred tax assets are realizable, the valuation
allowance will be reduced.
We regularly evaluate our estimates and judgments related to uncertain tax positions and when
necessary, establish contingency reserves to account for our uncertain tax positions. As we obtain
more information via the settlement of tax audits and through other pertinent information, these
projections and estimates are reassessed and may be adjusted accordingly. These adjustments may
result in significant income tax provisions or provision reversals.
29
Net Loss Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
$ |
1,781 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
We have a 51% interest in PCTEL Secure. The net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
represents 49% of the net loss of PCTEL Secure.
Stock-based compensation expense
Total stock compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $0.8 million in the
condensed consolidated statement of operations, which included $0.6 million of restricted stock
amortization, $0.1 million for performance share amortization, $0.1 million for stock option and
stock purchase plan expenses. Total stock compensation expense for the three months ended March
31, 2010 was $1.0 million in the condensed consolidated statement of operations, which included
$0.7 million of restricted stock amortization, $0.1 million for performance share amortization,
$0.1 million for stock option and stock purchase plan expenses, and $0.1 million for stock bonuses.
The following table summarizes the stock-based compensation expense by income statement line item
for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
91 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
821 |
|
|
$ |
952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
($1,900 |
) |
|
|
($795 |
) |
Charges for depreciation, amortization, stock-based
compensation, and other non-cash items |
|
|
2,511 |
|
|
|
1,521 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
|
|
(1,908 |
) |
|
|
(1,789 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(1,297 |
) |
|
|
(1,063 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(4,058 |
) |
|
|
(3,567 |
) |
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period |
|
$ |
18,929 |
|
|
$ |
23,998 |
|
Short-term investments at the end of period |
|
|
34,377 |
|
|
|
37,146 |
|
Long-term investments at the end of period |
|
|
14,829 |
|
|
|
9,802 |
|
Working capital at the end of period |
|
$ |
72,808 |
|
|
$ |
78,860 |
|
30
Liquidity and Capital Resources Overview
At March 31, 2011, our cash and investments were approximately $68.1 million and we had working
capital of $72.8 million. The decrease in cash and investments of $2.8 million at March 31, 2011
compared to December 31, 2010 is due to $1.3 million in negative cash flow from operations and $1.8
million in cash used for capital expenditures, net of $0.3 million of cash provided by proceeds
from issuance of the Companys common stock.
Within operating activities, we are historically a net generator of operating funds from our income
statement activities and a net user of operating funds for balance sheet expansion.
Within investing activities, capital spending historically ranges between 3% and 5% of our revenues
and the primary use of capital is for manufacturing and development engineering requirements. Our
capital expenditures during the three months ended March 31, 2011 were 10% of revenues because the
Company spent $1.1 million related to the implementation of a new ERP system. We historically have
significant transfers between investments and cash as we rotate our large cash balances and
short-term investment balances between money market funds, which are accounted for as cash
equivalents, and other investment vehicles. We have a history of supplementing our organic revenue
growth with acquisitions of product lines or companies, resulting in significant uses of our cash
and short-term investment balance from time to time. We expect the historical trend for capital
spending and the variability caused by moving money between cash and investments and periodic
merger and acquisition activity to continue in the future.
Within financing activities, we have historically generated funds from the exercise of stock
options and proceeds from the issuance of common stock through our Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(ESPP) and have historically used funds to repurchase shares of our common stock through our
share repurchase programs. Whether this activity results in our being a net user of funds versus a
net generator of funds is largely dependent on our stock price during any given year.
Operating Activities:
Operating activities used $1.3 million of cash during the three months ended March 31, 2011. We
used $1.9 million of cash from the balance sheet, offsetting $0.6 million in cash generated from
our income statement activities. The operations of PCTEL Secure used $0.2 million of cash during
the three months ended March 31, 2011. We used $1.2 million for payroll taxes related to
stock-based compensation. The tax payments related to the Companys stock issued for restricted
stock awards, stock bonuses under the 2010 Short Term Incentive Plan (STIP), and performance
shares. The tax payments were lower during the same period last year because there were no stock
bonuses or performance shares issued in the three months ended March 31, 2010. On the balance
sheet, the $1.6 million decrease in accruals consisted of payments for cash bonuses, sales
commissions, and inventory purchases. We used $0.9 million of cash for bonuses under the 2010 STIP
during the three months ended March 31, 2011. Cash bonuses were only $17 for the same period in
2010. We also used cash due to increases in inventories and accounts receivable. Inventory
increased by $0.8 million primarily due to the purchase of buffer inventory necessary during the
implementation of sourcing initiatives. Accounts receivable increased by $0.6 million primarily
due to the timing of shipments during the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to three
months ended December 31, 2010.
Operating activities used $1.1 million of cash during the three months ended March 31, 2010
primarily due to a net expansion in the balance sheet. During the three months ended March 31,
2010, an increase in accounts receivable of $2.9 million and a decrease in accounts payable of $0.5
million offset an increase in accrued liabilities of $1.4 million. The accounts receivable increase
was due to an increase in revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the three
months ended December 31, 2009 and because of the timing of the revenues within each quarter.
Revenues increased $0.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the
previous quarter. Further, revenues for the last month of the quarter ended March 31, 2010 were
$1.5 million higher than the last month of the quarter ended December 31, 2009, and billings were
$2.3 million higher in the last month of the quarter ended March 31, 2010 compared to the last
month of the quarter ended December 31, 2009. Our accrued liabilities increased due to increased
inventory receipts and bonus accruals. Our inventory purchases were higher at the end of the
quarter ended March 31, 2010 in order to meet our customer demand. The accruals at March 31, 2010
included estimates for 2010 bonuses. There were no bonus accruals at December 31, 2009 because we
did not pay out any bonuses under our 2009 Short-Term Incentive Plan.
Investing Activities:
Our investing activities used $4.1 million of cash during the three months ended March 31, 2011.
We used $2.3 for investments. Redemptions and maturities of our investments in short-term bonds
during the three months ended March 31, 2011 provided $15.4 million in funds. We rotated $17.7
million of cash into new short-term and long-term bonds during the three months ended March 31,
2011. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, our capital expenditures were $1.8 million. Our
capital expenditures included $1.1 million for our ERP project. We expect to spend approximately
$3.0 million on the ERP project in 2011, consisting of $2.4 million in capital expenditures and
$0.6 million in operating expenses.
31
Our investing activities used $3.6 million of cash during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
We used $2.1 million for the acquisition of Sparco in January 2010 and we used $1.3 million related
to investment activity. Redemptions and maturities of our investments in short-term bonds during
the three months ended March 31, 2010 provided $8.4 million in funds. We rotated $9.7 million of
cash into new short-term and long-term bonds during the three months ended March 31, 2010. For the
three months ended March 31, 2010, our capital expenditures were $0.1 million. The rate of capital
expenditures in relation to revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was below our
historical range.
Financing Activities:
Cash flow from financing activities provided $0.3 and $0.2 million for the three months ended March
31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, from the purchase of shares through our ESPP.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
As of March 31, 2011, we had operating lease obligations of approximately $1.7 million through
2016. Operating lease obligations consist of $1.6 million for facility lease obligations and $0.1
million for equipment leases. Our lease obligations were $1.9 million at December 31, 2010.
With the acquisition of Sparco, we assumed a lease for a 6,300 square foot facility used for
operations and sales activities in San Antonio, Texas. We integrated the Sparco manufacturing and
distribution operations in our Bloomingdale, Illinois facility in the third quarter 2010. When the
Sparco lease terminated in January 2011, we moved the Sparco sales offices to a new location in San
Antonio, Texas. The new sales office lease agreement terminates in June 2016.
In June 2010, we entered into a lease for an antenna engineering facility in Beijing, China. The
term of the lease is through June 2013.
We had purchase obligations of $4.8 million and $5.3 million at March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively. These obligations are for the purchase of inventory, as well as for other
goods and services in the ordinary course of business, and exclude the balances for purchases
currently recognized as liabilities on the balance sheet. We had a liability of $1.2 million
related to income tax uncertainties at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. We do
not know when this liability will be satisfied.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We use certain critical accounting policies as described in Item 7. Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates of our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for
the year ended December 31, 2010 (the 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K). There have been no
material changes in any of our critical accounting policies since December 31, 2010. See Note 2 in
the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion on recent accounting
pronouncements.
Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
See our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K (Item 7A). As of March 31, 2011, there have been no
material changes in this information.
Item 4: Controls and Procedures
Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In designing and evaluating
our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no
matter how well designed and operated, can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving the
desired control objectives, Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information
we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure,
and that such information is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within time periods
specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. There have been no changes in
our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this
report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
32
PART II Other Information
Item 1: Legal Proceedings
None
Item 1A: Risk Factors
Factors That May Affect Our Business, Financial Condition and Future Operating Results
There have been no material changes with respect to the risk factors as previously disclosed in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
Item 2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3: Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4: Removed and Reserved
Item 5: Other Information
None.
Item 6: Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
Reference |
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief
Executive Officer
pursuant to Exchange
Act Rules 13a-14(a) and
15d-14(a), as adopted
pursuant to Section 302
of Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief
Financial Officer
pursuant to Exchange
Act Rules 13a-14(a) and
15d-14(a), as adopted
pursuant to Section 302
of Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certifications of Chief
Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Setion 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906
of Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Limited Liability
Company Agreement,
dated January 5, 2011,
by and between PCTEL,
Inc. and Eclipse Design
Technologies, Inc.
|
|
Incorporated by
reference to this
exhibit filed with the
Registrants Current
Report on Form 8-K
filed on January 11,
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Letter Agreement dated
April 12, 2011 between
PCTEL, Inc. and Anthony
Kobrinetz
|
|
Incorporated by
reference to the
exhibit 10.74 filed
with the Registrants
Current Report on Form
8-K filed on April 14,
2011 |
33
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized:
|
|
|
|
|
PCTEL, Inc.
a Delaware corporation
|
|
|
/s/ Martin H. Singer
|
|
|
Martin H. Singer |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
Date: May 10, 2011
34