e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended March
31, 2011
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period
from to .
|
Commission File Number
1-8462
GRAHAM CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
DELAWARE
|
|
16-1194720
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
incorporation or
organization)
|
|
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
20 Florence Avenue, Batavia, New York
|
|
14020
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code
585-343-2216
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
Common Stock (Par Value $.10)
|
|
NYSE Amex
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
|
Title of Class
|
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights
|
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by checkmark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant as of September 30, 2010,
the last business day of the registrants most recently
completed second fiscal quarter, was $143,349,083. The market
value calculation was determined using the closing price of the
registrants common stock on September 30, 2010, as
reported on the NYSE Amex exchange. For purposes of the
foregoing calculation only, all directors, officers and the
Employee Stock Ownership Plan of the registrant have been deemed
affiliates.
As of May 27, 2011, the registrant had outstanding
9,865,642 shares of common stock, $.10 par value, and
9,865,642 preferred stock purchase rights.
Documents
Incorporated By Reference
Portions of the registrants definitive Proxy Statement, to
be filed in connection with the registrants 2011 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be held on July 28, 2011, are
incorporated by reference into Part III, Items 10, 11,
12, 13 and 14 of this filing.
Table of
Contents
GRAHAM CORPORATION
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
Year Ended March 31, 2011
|
|
Note: |
Portions of the registrants definitive Proxy Statement, to
be issued in connection with the registrants 2011 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be held on July 28, 2011, are
incorporated by reference into Part III, Items 10, 11,
12, 13 and 14 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
PART I
(Dollar
amounts in thousands except per share data).
Graham Corporation (Graham, the Company,
we, us or our) designs,
manufactures and sells custom-built vacuum and heat transfer
equipment to customers worldwide. Our products include steam jet
ejector vacuum systems, surface condensers for steam turbines,
vacuum pumps and compressors, various types of heat exchangers,
including helical coil heat exchangers marketed under the
Heliflow®
name, and plate and frame heat exchangers. Our products produce
a vacuum, condense steam vapor or transfer heat, or perform a
combination of these tasks. Our products are available in a
variety of metals and non-metallic corrosion resistant materials.
We acquired Energy Steel and Supply Company (Energy
Steel) in December 2010 as part of our strategy to
diversify our products and broaden our offerings to the energy
industry. Energy Steel is a nuclear code accredited fabrication
and specialty machining company which provides products to the
nuclear power generation industry, primarily in the United
States.
Our products are used in a wide range of industrial process
applications, including:
Petroleum
Refining
Chemical
and Petrochemical Processing
|
|
|
|
|
fertilizer plants
|
|
|
|
ethylene, methanol and nitrogen producing plants
|
|
|
|
plastics, resins and fibers plants
|
|
|
|
petrochemical intermediate plants
|
|
|
|
coals-to-chemicals
plants
|
|
|
|
gas-to-liquids
plants
|
Power
Generation/Alternate Energy
|
|
|
|
|
nuclear power generation
|
|
|
|
fossil fuel plants
|
|
|
|
biomass plants
|
|
|
|
cogeneration power plants
|
|
|
|
geothermal power plants
|
|
|
|
ethanol plants
|
Defense
|
|
|
|
|
propulsion systems for nuclear aircraft carriers and other
nuclear powered vessels
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
soap manufacturing plants
|
|
|
|
air conditioning and water heating systems
|
|
|
|
food processing plants
|
|
|
|
pharmaceutical plants
|
|
|
|
liquefied natural gas production facilities
|
1
Our
Customers and Markets
Our principal customers are in the chemical, petrochemical,
petroleum refining and power generating industries, and can be
end users of our products in their manufacturing, refining and
power generation processes, large engineering companies that
build installations for companies in such industries,
and/or the
original equipment manufacturers, who combine our products with
their equipment prior to its sale to end users.
Our products are sold by a team of sales engineers we employ
directly and independent sales representatives located
worldwide. No part of our business is typically dependent on a
single customer or a few customers, the loss of which would
seriously harm our business, or on contracts or subcontracts
that are subject to renegotiation or termination by a
governmental agency. There may be short periods of time, a
fiscal year for example, where one customer may make up greater
than 10% of our business. However, if this occurs in multiple
years, it is usually not the same customer or the same project
over the multi-year period.
Historically, 40% to 55% percent of our revenue has been
generated from foreign sales. We believe that revenue from the
sale of our products outside the U.S. will continue to
account for a significant portion of our total revenue for the
foreseeable future. We have invested significant resources in
developing and maintaining our international sales operations
and presence, and we intend to continue to make such investments
in the future. As a result of the expansion of our presence in
Asia, we expect that the Asian market will over time account for
an increasing percentage of our revenue. However, with the
acquisition of Energy Steel, whose sales are primarily domestic,
we expect international sales to continue to account for 40% to
55% or more of total revenue over the next few years.
A breakdown of our net sales by geographic area and product
class for our fiscal years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and
2009, which we refer to as fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal
2009, respectively, is contained in Note 12 to our
consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of
Part II of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and such breakdown is incorporated into this Item 1 by
reference. We refer to our fiscal year ending March 31,
2012 as fiscal 2012. Our backlog at March 31, 2011 was
$91,096 compared with $94,255 at March 31, 2010.
We were incorporated in Delaware in 1983 and are the successor
to Graham Manufacturing Co., Inc., which was incorporated in New
York in 1936. Our principal business location is in Batavia, New
York. We maintain two wholly-owned subsidiaries, Graham Vacuum
and Heat Transfer Technology (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., located in
Suzhou, China and Energy Steel, located in Lapeer, Michigan. As
of March 31, 2011, we had 317 full-time employees. On
December 14, 2010, we acquired Energy Steel. This
transaction was accounted for under the acquisition method of
accounting. Accordingly, the results of Energy Steel were
included in our Consolidated Financial Statements from the date
of acquisition.
Our
Strengths
Our core strengths include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
We have strong brand recognition. Over the
past 75 years, we believe that we have built a reputation
for top quality, reliable products and high standards of
customer service. We have also established a large installed
application base. As a result, the Graham name is well known not
only by our existing customers, but also by many of our
potential customers. We believe that the recognition of the
Graham brand allows us to capitalize on market opportunities in
both existing and potential markets. Energy Steel has a
30-year
history of providing products and support to its customers,
especially the U.S. nuclear power industry, and has a
recognized brand name in its markets.
|
|
|
|
We custom engineer and manufacture high quality products and
systems that address the particular needs of our
customers. With 75 years of engineering
expertise, we believe that we are well respected for our
knowledge in vacuum and heat transfer technologies. We maintain
strict quality control and manufacturing standards in order to
manufacture products of the highest quality.
|
|
|
|
We have a global presence. Our products are
used worldwide, and we have sales representatives located in
many countries throughout the world.
|
|
|
|
We have a strong reputation. We believe that
we have a solid reputation of both placing customers first and
standing behind our products. We believe that our relationships
are strong with our existing customer base, as well as with our
key suppliers.
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
We have a highly trained workforce. We
maintain a long-tenured, skilled and flexible workforce.
|
|
|
|
We have a strong balance sheet. We maintain
significant cash and investments on hand, and no bank debt. Our
defined benefit pension plan obligations are fully funded.
|
|
|
|
We have a high quality credit facility. Our
credit facility provides us with a $25,000 borrowing capacity
that is expandable at our option at any time up to a total of
$50,000.
|
Our
Strategy
Our objective is to capture more market share within the
geographies and industries we serve, expand our geographic
markets, grow our presence in the energy industry and
continually improve our results of operations. Our strategy to
accomplish our objective is:
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalize on the strength of the Graham and Energy Steel brands
in order to win more business in our traditional markets and
enter other markets.
|
|
|
|
Identify and consummate acquisition and organic growth
opportunities where we believe our brand strength will provide
us with the ability to expand and complement our core business.
We intend to accomplish this objective by extending our existing
product lines, moving into complementary product lines and
expanding our global sales presence in order to further broaden
our existing markets and reach additional markets. Our
acquisition of Energy Steel was in furtherance of this portion
of our business strategy.
|
|
|
|
Maximize the benefits from our acquisition of Energy Steel. We
plan to expand our market penetration with Energy Steels
current customer base in the domestic nuclear industry. We also
intend to identify additional domestic and international
opportunities to serve the nuclear industry.
|
|
|
|
Expand our market presence in the Navys Nuclear Propulsion
Program. We plan to capitalize on our success in securing the
nuclear carrier order by flawlessly executing our existing order
for this program. We also plan to expand our market presence
into additional defense-related programs, including nuclear
submarines and destroyer projects.
|
|
|
|
Invest in people and capital equipment to meet the long-term
growth in demand for our products in the oil refining,
petrochemical processing and power generating industries,
especially in emerging markets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deliver highest quality products and solutions that enable our
customers to achieve their operating objectives and that
differentiate us from our competitors, and which we believe
allow us to win new orders based on value.
|
In order to effectively implement our strategy, we also believe
that we must continually work to improve our company. These
efforts include:
|
|
|
|
|
Investing in engineering resources and technology in order to
advance our vacuum and heat transfer technology market
penetration.
|
|
|
|
Enhancing our engineering and manufacturing capacities,
especially in connection with the design of our products, in
order to more quickly respond to existing and future customer
demand and to minimize underutilization of capacity.
|
|
|
|
Accelerating our ability to quickly and efficiently bid on
available contracts by continuing to implement front-end bid
automation and design processes.
|
|
|
|
Expanding our capabilities and penetrating the existing sales
channel and customer base in the nuclear market.
|
|
|
|
Expanding our margins by implementing and expanding upon our
operational efficiencies through a flexible manufacturing flow
model and other cost efficiencies.
|
|
|
|
Continuing to focus on production error elimination and rework
reduction.
|
3
Competition
Our business is highly competitive. The principal bases on which
we compete include technology, price, performance, reputation,
delivery, and quality. Our competitors in our primary markets
include:
NORTH
AMERICA
|
|
|
Market
|
|
Principle Competitors
|
|
Refining vacuum distillation
|
|
Gardner Denver, Inc.
|
Chemicals/Petrochemicals
|
|
Croll Reynolds Company, Inc.; Schutte Koerting; Gardner Denver,
Inc.
|
Turbomachinery Original Equipment Manufacturer
(OEM) refining, petrochemical
|
|
Ambassador; KEMCO; Yuba Heat Transfer
|
Turbomachinery OEM power and power producer
|
|
Holtec; Thermal Engineering International (USA), Inc.; Krueger;
Yuba Heat Transfer
|
HVAC
|
|
Alfa Laval AB; APV; ITT; Ambassador
|
Nuclear
|
|
Dubose, Consolidated, Tioga, Nova, Joseph Oats, Energy &
Process
|
INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
Market
|
|
Principle Competitors
|
|
Refining vacuum distillation
|
|
Gardner Denver, Inc.; GEA Wiegand GmbH; Edwards, Ltd.; Korting
Hannover AG
|
Chemicals/Petrochemicals
|
|
Croll Reynolds Company, Inc.; Schutte Koerting; Gardner Denver,
Inc.; GEA Wiegand GmbH; Korting Hannover AG; Edwards, Ltd.
|
Turbomachinery OEM refining, petrochemical
|
|
DongHwa Entec Co., Ltd.; Bumwoo Engineering Co., Ltd.;
Oeltechnik GmbH; Krueger
|
Turbomachinery OEM power and power producer
|
|
Holtec; Thermal Engineering International; Krueger; Yuba Heat
Transfer
|
Intellectual
Property
Our success depends in part on our proprietary technology. We
rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark, trade
secret laws and contractual confidentiality provisions to
establish and protect our proprietary rights. We also depend
heavily on the brand recognition of the Graham name in the
marketplace.
Availability
of Raw Materials
Although shortages of certain materials can from time to time
affect our ability to meet delivery requirements for certain
orders, historically, we have not been materially adversely
impacted by the availability of raw materials.
Working
Capital Practices
Our business does not require us to carry significant amounts of
inventory or materials beyond what is needed for work in
process. Although we do not provide rights to return goods, or
payment terms to customers that we consider to be extended in
the context of the industries we serve, we do provide for
warranty claims.
Environmental
Matters
We believe that we are in material compliance with existing
environmental laws and regulations. We do not anticipate that
our compliance with federal, state and local laws regulating the
discharge of material in the
4
environment or otherwise pertaining to the protection of the
environment will have a material effect upon our capital
expenditures, earnings or competitive position.
Seasonality
No material part of our business is seasonal in nature. However,
our business is highly cyclical in nature as it depends on the
willingness of our customers to invest in major capital projects.
Research
and Development Activities
During fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, we spent
$2,576, $3,824 and $3,347, respectively, on research and
development activities related to new products and services, or
the improvement of existing products and services.
Information
Regarding International Sales
The sale of our products outside the U.S. has accounted for
a significant portion of our total revenue during our last three
fiscal years. Approximately 55%, 55% and 37% of our revenue in
fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively, resulted
from foreign sales. Sales in Asia constituted approximately 22%,
33% and 13% of our revenue in fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and
fiscal 2009, respectively. Sales in the Middle East constituted
approximately 16%, 10% and 8% of our revenue in fiscal 2011,
fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively. Our foreign sales and
operations are subject to numerous risks, as discussed under the
heading Risk Factors in Item 1A of Part I
and elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Employees
As of March 31, 2011, we employed approximately
329 persons, including 10 part-time employees. We
believe that our relationship with our employees is good.
Available
Information
We are subject to the informational requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Therefore, we file
periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with
the Securities and Exchange Commission. The SEC maintains an
Internet website (located at www.sec.gov) that contains reports,
proxy statements and other information for registrants that file
electronically. Additionally, such reports may be read and
copied at the Public Reference Room of the SEC at
100 F Street NE, Washington, D.C. 20549.
Information regarding the SECs Public Reference Room can
be obtained by calling
1-800-SEC-0330.
We maintain an Internet website located at www.graham-mfg.com.
On our website, we provide a link to the SECs Internet
website that contains the reports, proxy statements and other
information we file electronically. We do not provide this
information on our website because it is more cost effective for
us to provide a link to the SECs website. Copies of all
documents we file with the SEC are available in print for any
stockholder who makes a request. Such requests should be made to
our Corporate Secretary at our corporate headquarters. The other
information found on our website is not part of this or any
other report we file with, or furnish to, the SEC.
Our business and operations are subject to numerous risks, many
of which are described below and elsewhere in this Annual Report
on
Form 10-K.
If any of the events described below or elsewhere in this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
occur, our business and results of operations could be harmed.
Additional risks and uncertainties that are not presently known
to us, or which we currently deem to be immaterial, could also
harm our business and results of operations.
5
Risks
related to our business
The
industries in which we operate are cyclical, and downturns in
such industries may adversely affect our operating
results.
Historically, a substantial portion of our revenue has been
derived from the sale of our products to companies in the
chemical, petrochemical, petroleum refining and power generating
industries and the U.S. Department of Defense, or to firms
that design and construct facilities for these industries. The
core industries in which our products are used are, to varying
degrees, cyclical and have historically experienced severe
downturns. Although we believe there will be a long-term
expansion of demand for our products in the petrochemical,
petroleum refining and power generating industries, during
fiscal 2008 we entered a sudden downturn in the demand for our
products. Historically, previous cyclical downturns have lasted
from one to several years. Although the downturn that began in
fiscal 2008 has begun to moderate and we have seen recent
signals of economic recovery in our markets, we have no way to
predict whether any recovery will be sustainable. A longer than
normal down cycle could force us to reduce our infrastructure,
which would make it difficult for us to quickly recover in the
subsequent up cycle. A sustained or renewed deterioration in any
of the cyclical industries we serve would materially harm our
business and operating results because our customers would not
likely have the resources necessary to purchase our products,
nor would they likely have the need to build additional
facilities or improve existing facilities.
We
serve markets that are capital intensive. Volatility and
disruption of the capital and credit markets and adverse changes
in the global economy may negatively impact our operating
results. Such volatility and disruption may also negatively
impact our ability to access additional financing.
Although we believe that our long-term growth prospects remain
strong, we also expect that the recent state of the capital and
credit markets caused a slow-down in spending by our customers
as they continue to evaluate their project plans. Although we
believe that we are in the initial stages of an economic
recovery, if adverse economic and credit conditions persist,
return or worsen, we would likely experience decreased revenue
from our operations attributable to decreases in the spending
levels of our customers. Moreover, adverse economic and credit
conditions might also have a negative adverse effect on our cash
flows if customers demand that we accept smaller project
deposits and less frequent progress payments. In addition,
adverse economic and credit conditions could put downward
pricing pressure on us. Any of the foregoing could have a
material adverse effect on our business and results of
operations.
Adverse conditions in the capital and credit markets could also
have an adverse effect on our ability to obtain additional
financing on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, should we
determine such financing is desirable to maintain or expand our
business.
The
larger markets we serve are the petroleum refining and
petrochemical industries which are both cyclical in nature and
dependent on the price of crude oil. As a result, volatility in
the price of oil may negatively impact our operating
results.
Although we believe that the global consumption of crude oil
will increase over the course of the next 20 years and that
such increased consumption will result in a need to continually
increase global oil refining capacity, the price of crude oil
has been very volatile. Many of our products are purchased in
connection with oil refinery construction, revamps and upgrades.
During times of significant volatility in the market for crude
oil, our customers may refrain from placing orders until the
market stabilizes. During such times of high volatility, we
could experience decreased revenue from our operations
attributable to decreases in the spending levels of our
customers.
A
large percentage of our sales occur outside of the U.S. As a
result, we are subject to the economic, political, regulatory
and other risks of international operations.
For fiscal 2011, 55% of our revenue was from customers located
outside of the U.S. Moreover, we maintain a subsidiary and
have facilities in China. We believe that revenue from the sale
of our products outside the U.S. will continue to account
for a significant portion of our total revenue for the
foreseeable future. We intend to continue to
6
expand our international operations to the extent that suitable
opportunities become available. Our foreign operations and sales
could be adversely affected as a result of:
|
|
|
|
|
nationalization of private enterprises and assets;
|
|
|
|
political or economic instability in certain countries and
regions, such as the recent uprisings and instability throughout
the Middle East;
|
|
|
|
differences in foreign laws, including increased difficulties in
protecting intellectual property and uncertainty in enforcement
of contract rights;
|
|
|
|
the possibility that foreign governments may adopt regulations
or take other actions that could directly or indirectly harm our
business and growth strategy;
|
|
|
|
credit risks;
|
|
|
|
currency fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
tariff and tax increases;
|
|
|
|
export and import restrictions and restrictive regulations of
foreign governments;
|
|
|
|
shipping products during times of crisis or wars;
|
|
|
|
our failure to comply with United States laws regarding doing
business in foreign jurisdictions, such as the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act; and
|
|
|
|
other factors inherent in foreign operations.
|
We are
subject to foreign currency fluctuations which may adversely
affect our operating results.
We are exposed to the risk of currency fluctuations between the
U.S. dollar and the currencies of the countries in which we
sell our products to the extent that such sales are not based on
U.S. dollars. As such, fluctuations in currency exchange
rates, which cause the value of the dollar to increase, could
have a material adverse effect on the profitability of our
business. While we may enter into currency exchange rate hedges
from time to time to mitigate these types of fluctuations, we
cannot remove all fluctuations or hedge all exposures and our
earnings are impacted by changes in currency exchange rates. In
addition, if the counter-parties to such exchange contracts do
not fulfill their obligations to deliver the contractual foreign
currencies, we could be at risk for fluctuations, if any,
required to settle the obligation. At March 31, 2011, we
held no forward foreign currency exchange contracts.
Efforts
to reduce large U.S. federal budget deficits could result in
government cutbacks in defense spending or in reduced incentives
to pursue alternative energy projects, resulting in reduced
demand for our products.
Our business strategy calls for us to continue to pursue
defense-related projects as well as projects for end users in
the alternative energy markets in the U.S. In recent years
the U.S. federal government has incurred large budget
deficits. In the event that the U.S. federal government
defense spending is reduced or alternative energy related
incentives are reduced or eliminated in an effort to reduce
federal budget deficits, projects related to defense or
alternative energy may become less plentiful. The impact of such
reductions could have a materially adverse affect on our
business and operations.
Changes
in tax policies and tax rates in the U.S. could result in
adverse impacts for domestic manufacturing investments,
resulting in reduced demand for our products.
Our business is dependent on significant manufacturing
investment in the U.S. and the impact of changes to
U.S. tax policy around investment and capital spending
depreciation can reduce our customers willingness to
invest in domestic capacity. The impact of such reductions could
have a materially adverse affect on our business and operations.
7
If we
fail to introduce enhancements to our existing products or to
keep abreast of technological changes in our markets, our
business and results of operations could be adversely
affected.
Although technologies in the vacuum and heat transfer areas are
well established, we believe our future success depends, in
part, on our ability to enhance our existing products and
develop new products in order to continue to meet customer
demands. Our failure to introduce new or enhanced products on a
timely and cost-competitive basis, or the development of
processes that make our existing technologies or products
obsolete, could materially harm our business and results of
operations.
The
loss of any member of our management team and our inability to
make up for such loss with a qualified replacement could harm
our business.
Competition for qualified management and key technical personnel
in our industry is intense. Moreover our technology is highly
specialized and it may be difficult to replace the loss of any
of our key technical personnel. Many of the companies with which
we compete for management and key technical personnel have
greater financial and other resources than we do or are located
in geographic areas which may be considered by some to be more
desirable places to live. If we are not able to retain any of
our key management or technical personnel, our business could be
materially harmed.
Our
business is highly competitive. If we are unable to successfully
implement our business strategy and compete against entities
with greater resources than us, we risk losing market share to
current and future competitors.
Some of our present and potential competitors may have
substantially greater financial, marketing, technical or
manufacturing resources. Our competitors may also be able to
respond more quickly to new technologies or processes and
changes in customer demands and they may be able to devote
greater resources towards the development, promotion and sale of
their products than we can. In addition, our current and
potential competitors may make strategic acquisitions or
establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with
third parties that increase their ability to address the needs
of our customers. Moreover, customer buying patterns can change
if customers become more price sensitive and accepting of low
cost suppliers. If we cannot compete successfully against
current or future competitors, our business will be materially
harmed.
If we
are unable to make necessary capital investments or respond to
pricing pressures, our business may be harmed.
In order to remain competitive, we need to invest continuously
in manufacturing, customer service and support, research and
development and marketing. From time to time we also have to
adjust the prices of our products to remain competitive. We may
not have available sufficient financial or other resources to
continue to make investments necessary to maintain our
competitive position, which would materially harm our business.
If
third parties infringe upon our intellectual property or if we
were to infringe upon the intellectual property of third
parties, we may expend significant resources enforcing or
defending our rights or suffer competitive injury.
Our success depends in part on our proprietary technology. We
rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark, trade
secret laws and confidentiality provisions to establish and
protect our proprietary rights. If we fail to successfully
enforce our intellectual property rights, our competitive
position could suffer. We may also be required to spend
significant resources to monitor and police our intellectual
property rights. Similarly, if we were found to have
unintentionally infringed on the intellectual property rights of
others, our competitive position could suffer. Furthermore,
other companies may develop technologies that are similar or
superior to our technologies, duplicate or reverse engineer our
technologies or design around our patents. Any of the foregoing
could have a material adverse effect on our business and results
of operations.
In some instances, litigation may be necessary to enforce our
intellectual property rights and protect our proprietary
information, or to defend against claims by third parties that
our products infringe their intellectual property rights. Any
litigation or claims brought by or against us, whether with or
without merit, could result in
8
substantial costs to us and divert the attention of our
management, which could materially harm our business and results
of operations. In addition, any intellectual property litigation
or claims against us could result in the loss or compromise of
our intellectual property and proprietary rights, subject us to
significant liabilities, require us to seek licenses on
unfavorable terms, prevent us from manufacturing or selling
certain products or require us to redesign certain products, any
of which could materially harm our business and results of
operations.
We are
subject to contract cancellations and delays by our customers,
which may adversely affect our operating results.
The dollar amount of our backlog as of March 31, 2011 was
$91,096. Our backlog can be significantly affected by the timing
of large orders, and the amount of our backlog at March 31,
2011 is not necessarily indicative of future backlog levels or
the rate at which our backlog will be recognized as sales.
Although historically the amount of modifications and
terminations of our orders has not been material compared with
our total contract volume, customers can, and sometimes do,
terminate or modify their orders. We cannot predict whether
cancellations will occur or accelerate in the future. Although
certain of our contracts in backlog may contain provisions
allowing for us to assess cancellation charges to our customers
to compensate us for costs incurred on cancelled contracts,
cancellations of purchase orders or modifications made to
existing contracts could substantially and materially reduce our
backlog and, consequently, our future sales and results of
operations. Moreover, delay of contract execution by our
customers can result in volatility in our operating results.
Two orders in our backlog, the U.S. Navy project and a
Middle East refinery project, are expected to account for
approximately 25% of fiscal 2012 revenue. Any delay in either of
these projects could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations.
A
decrease in supply or cost of the materials used in our products
could harm our profit margins.
Our profitability depends in part on the price and continuity of
supply of the materials used in the manufacture of our products,
which in many instances are supplied by a limited number of
sources. The availability and costs of these commodities may be
influenced by, among other things, market forces of supply and
demand, changes in world politics, labor relations between the
producers and their work forces, export quotas, and inflation.
Any restrictions on the supply of the materials used by us in
manufacturing our products could significantly reduce our profit
margins, which could harm our results of operations. Likewise,
any efforts we may engage in to mitigate restrictions on the
supply or price increases of materials by entering into
long-term purchase agreements, by implementing productivity
improvements or by passing cost increases on to our customers
may not be successful. In addition, the ability of our suppliers
to meet quality and delivery requirements can also impact our
ability to meet commitments to customers. Future shortages or
price fluctuations in raw materials could result in decreased
sales as well as margins, or otherwise materially adversely
affect our business.
The
loss of, or significant reduction or delay in, purchases by our
largest customers could reduce our revenue and adversely affect
our results of operations.
A small number of customers has accounted for a substantial
portion of our historical net sales. For example, sales to our
top ten customers accounted for 46%, 44% and 42% of consolidated
sales in fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. We
expect that a limited number of customers will continue to
represent a substantial portion of our sales for the foreseeable
future. The loss of any of our major customers or a decrease or
delay in orders or anticipated spending by such customers could
materially adversely affect our revenues and results of
operations.
Our
exposure to fixed-price contracts could negatively impact our
results of operations.
A substantial portion of our sales is derived from fixed-price
contracts, which may involve long-term fixed price commitments
to customers. While we believe our contract management processes
are strong, we nevertheless could experience difficulties in
executing large contracts, including but not limited to, cost
overruns, supplier failures and customer disputes. To the extent
that any of our fixed-price contracts are delayed, our
subcontractors fail to perform, contract counterparties
successfully assert claims against us, the original cost
estimates in these or other contracts prove to be inaccurate or
the contracts do not permit us to pass increased costs on to our
customers,
9
our profitability from a particular contract may decrease or
losses may be incurred, which, in turn, could adversely affect
our results of operations.
If we
are unable to effectively outsource a portion of our production
during times when we are experiencing strong demand, our results
of operations might be adversely affected. In addition,
outsourcing may negatively affect our profit
margins.
When we experience strong demand for our products, our business
strategy calls for us to increase manufacturing capacity through
outsourcing selected fabrication processes. We could experience
difficulty in outsourcing if customers demand that our products
be manufactured by us exclusively. Furthermore, our ability to
effectively outsource production could be adversely affected by
worldwide manufacturing capacity. If we are unable to
effectively outsource our production capacity when circumstances
warrant, our results of operations could be materially adversely
affected and we might not be able to deliver products to our
customers on a timely basis. In addition, outsourcing to
complete our products and services can increase the costs
associated with such products and services. If we rely too
heavily on outsourcing and are not able to increase our own
production capacity during times when there is high demand for
our products and services, our profit margins may be negatively
impacted.
We
face potential liability from asbestos exposure and similar
claims.
We are a defendant in several lawsuits alleging illnesses from
exposure to asbestos or asbestos-containing products and seeking
unspecified compensatory and punitive damages. We cannot predict
with certainty the outcome of these lawsuits or whether we could
become subject to any similar, related or additional lawsuits in
the future. In addition, because some of our products are used
in systems that handle toxic or hazardous substances, any
failure or alleged failure of our products in the future could
result in litigation against us. For example, a claim could be
made under various regulations for the adverse consequences of
environmental contamination. Any litigation brought against us,
whether with or without merit, could result in substantial costs
to us as well as divert the attention of our management, which
could materially harm our business and results of operations.
If we
become subject to product liability, warranty or other claims,
our results of operations and financial condition could be
adversely affected.
The manufacture and sale of our products exposes us to potential
product liability claims, including those that may arise from
failure to meet product specifications, misuse or malfunction
of, design flaws in our products, or use of our products with
systems not manufactured or sold by us. For example, our
equipment is installed in facilities that operate dangerous
processes and the misapplication, improper installation or
failure of our equipment may result in exposure to potentially
hazardous substances, personal injury or property damage.
Provisions contained in our contracts with customers that
attempt to limit our damages may not be enforceable or may fail
to protect us from liability for damages and we may not
negotiate such contractual limitations of liability in certain
circumstances. Although we carry liability insurance that we
believe is adequate to protect us from product liability claims
based on our historical experience, our insurance may not cover
all liabilities nor may our historical experience reflect any
liabilities we may face in the future. We also may not be able
to continue to maintain such insurance at a reasonable cost or
on reasonable terms, or at all. Any material liability not
covered by provisions in our contracts or by insurance could
have a material adverse effect on our business and financial
condition.
Furthermore, if a customer suffers damage as a result of an
event related to one of our products, even if we are not at
fault, they may reduce their business with us. We may also incur
significant warranty claims, which are not covered by insurance.
In the event a customer ceases doing business with us as a
result of a product malfunction or defect, perceived or actual,
or if we incur significant warranty costs in the future, there
could be a material adverse effect on our business and results
of operations.
Changes
in or enforcement of energy policy regulations could adversely
affect our business.
Energy policy in the U.S. and in the other countries where
we sell our products is evolving rapidly and we anticipate that
energy policy will continue to be an important legislative
priority in the jurisdictions where we sell
10
our products. It is difficult, if not impossible, to predict the
changes in energy policy that could occur. The elimination of,
or a change in, any of the current rules and regulations in any
of our markets could create a regulatory environment that makes
our end users less likely to purchase our products, which would
have a material adverse effect on our business.
Any
global economic recovery may be led by emerging markets, which
could result in lower profit margins and increased
competition.
A global economic recovery may be led by emerging markets. In
the event that a global economic recovery is led by emerging
markets, we could face increased competition from lower cost
suppliers, which in turn could lead to lower profit margins on
our products. In addition, if the global economic recovery is
led by emerging markets, the pace of such recovery could be
slower than the pace of prior recoveries. Customers in emerging
markets may also place less emphasis on our high quality and
brand name than do customers in the U.S. and certain of the
other industrialized countries where we compete. If we are
forced to compete for business with customers that place less
emphasis on quality and brand recognition than our current
customers or the pace of any economic recovery is slower than
the pace of prior recoveries, our results of operations could be
materially adversely impacted.
Risks
related to operating a subsidiary and doing business in
China
In addition to the factors identified above, the operation of
our Chinese subsidiary is subject to the following additional
risks:
The
operations of our Chinese subsidiary may be adversely affected
by Chinas evolving economic, political and social
conditions.
We conduct our business in China primarily through a
wholly-owned Chinese subsidiary. The results of operations and
future prospects of our Chinese subsidiary are subject to
evolving economic, political and social developments in China.
In particular, the results of operations of our Chinese
subsidiary may be adversely affected by, among other things,
changes in Chinas political, economic and social
conditions, changes in policies of the Chinese government,
changes in laws and regulations or in the interpretation of
existing laws and regulations, changes in foreign exchange
regulations, measures that may be introduced to control
inflation, such as interest rate increases, and changes in the
rates or methods of taxation. In addition, changes in demand
could result from increased competition from local Chinese
manufacturers who have cost advantages or who may be preferred
suppliers. Also, Chinese commercial laws, regulations and
interpretations applicable to non-Chinese owned market
participants such as us are rapidly changing. These laws,
regulations and interpretations could impose restrictions on our
ownership or operations of our interests in China and have a
material adverse effect on our business.
Intellectual
property rights are difficult to enforce in China.
Chinese commercial law is relatively undeveloped compared with
the commercial law in many of our other major markets and
limited protection of intellectual property is available in
China as a practical matter. Although we take precautions in the
operations of our Chinese subsidiary to protect our intellectual
property, any local design or manufacture of products that we
undertake in China could subject us to an increased risk that
unauthorized parties will be able to copy or otherwise obtain or
use our intellectual property, which could harm our business. We
may also have limited legal recourse in the event we encounter
patent or trademark infringers.
Uncertainties
with respect to the Chinese legal system may adversely affect
the operations of our Chinese subsidiary.
Our Chinese subsidiary is subject to laws and regulations
applicable to foreign investment in China. There are
uncertainties regarding the interpretation and enforcement of
laws, rules and policies in China. The Chinese legal system is
based on written statutes, and prior court decisions have
limited precedential value. Because many laws and regulations
are relatively new and the Chinese legal system is still
evolving, the interpretations of many laws, regulations and
rules are not always uniform. Moreover, the relative
inexperience of Chinas judiciary in many cases creates
additional uncertainty as to the outcome of any litigation, and
the interpretation of statutes and regulations
11
may be subject to government policies reflecting domestic
political changes. Finally, enforcement of existing laws or
contracts based on existing law may be uncertain and sporadic.
For the preceding reasons, it may be difficult for us to obtain
swift and equitable enforcement of laws ostensibly designed to
protect companies like ours.
Risks
related to our acquisition and ownership of Energy
Steel & Supply Company
In addition to the factors identified above, the operation of
our subsidiary Energy Steel is subject to the following
additional risks:
It may
be more difficult, costly or time-consuming to integrate our
historical business with the business of Energy Steel than we
expect.
On December 14, 2010, we acquired Energy Steel, a
fabrication and specialty machining company dedicated
exclusively to the nuclear power industry. The success of our
acquisition of Energy Steel will depend, in part, on our ability
to realize the anticipated benefits from integrating our
historical business, operations and management with the
business, operations and management of Energy Steel. We cannot
provide any assurances that we will be able to integrate the
business and operations of Energy Steel without encountering
difficulties, including unanticipated costs, difficulty in
retaining customers and supplier or other relationships, failure
to retain key employees, diversion of our managements
attention, failure to integrate information and accounting
systems or establish and maintain proper internal control over
financial reporting. Moreover, as part of the integration
process, we must conform Energy Steels existing business
culture and compensation structure with ours. If we are not able
to efficiently integrate Energy Steels business and
operations into our organization in a timely and efficient
manner, or at all, the anticipated benefits of our acquisition
of Energy Steel may not be realized, or it may take longer to
realize these benefits than we currently expect, either of which
could materially harm our business or results of operations.
Our
acquisition of Energy Steel might subject us to unknown
liabilities.
Energy Steel may have unknown liabilities, including, but not
limited to, product liability, workers compensation
liability, tax liability and liability for improper business
practices. Although we are entitled to indemnification from the
seller of Energy Steel for these and other matters, we could
experience difficulty enforcing those obligations or we could
incur material liabilities for the past activities of Energy
Steel. Such liabilities and related legal or other costs could
materially harm our business or results of operations.
Political
and regulatory developments could make the utilization and
growth of nuclear power as an energy source less
desirable.
On March 11, 2011, a major earthquake and tsunami struck
Japan and caused substantial damage to the nuclear generating
units at the Fukushima Daiichi generating plant. The events in
Japan have created uncertainties worldwide regarding, among
other things, the desirability of operating existing nuclear
power plants and building new or replacement nuclear power
plants. Should public opinion or political pressure result in
the closing of existing nuclear facilities or otherwise result
in the failure of the nuclear power industry to grow, especially
within the U.S., the business and growth prospects of Energy
Steel could be materially adversely impacted.
In addition, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, or
NRC, plans to perform additional operational and safety reviews
of nuclear facilities in the U.S. It is possible that the
NRC could take action or impose regulations that adversely
affects the demand for Energy Steels products and
services, or otherwise delays or prohibits construction of new
nuclear power generation facilities, even temporarily. If any
such event were to occur, the business or operations of Energy
Steel could be materially adversely impacted.
Our
intangible assets substantially increased as a result of our
acquisition of Energy Steel. Should a portion of these
intangible assets be impaired, results of operations could be
materially adversely affected.
Our balance sheet includes intangible assets, including goodwill
and other separately identifiable intangible assets, primarily
as a result of our acquisition of Energy Steel. The value of
these intangible assets may increase in the future if we
complete additional acquisitions as part of our overall business
strategy. We are required to review our intangible assets for
impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if certain
indicators of permanent
12
impairment arise. Factors that could indicate that our
intangible assets are impaired could include, among other
things, a decline in our stock price and market capitalization,
lower than projected operating results and cash flows, and
slower than expected growth rates in our markets. If a portion
of our intangible assets becomes impaired as a result of such a
review, the impaired portion of such assets would have to be
written-off during that period. Such a write-off could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Risks
related to the ownership of our common stock
Provisions
contained in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could
impair or delay stockholders ability to change our
management and could discourage takeover transactions that our
stockholders might consider to be in their best
interests.
Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could
impede attempts by our stockholders to remove or replace our
management and could discourage others from initiating a
potential merger, takeover or other change of control
transaction, including a potential transaction at a premium over
the market price of our common stock, that our stockholders
might consider to be in their best interests. For example:
|
|
|
|
|
We could issue shares of preferred stock with terms
adverse to our common stock. Under our
certificate of incorporation, our Board of Directors is
authorized to issue shares of preferred stock and to determine
the rights, preferences and privileges of such shares without
obtaining any further approval from the holders of our common
stock. We could issue shares of preferred stock with voting and
conversion rights that adversely affect the voting power of the
holders of our common stock, or that have the effect of delaying
or preventing a change in control of our company.
|
|
|
|
Only a minority of our directors may be elected in a given
year. Our bylaws provide for a classified
Board of Directors, with only approximately one-third of our
Board elected each year. This provision makes it more difficult
to effect a change of control because at least two annual
stockholder meetings are necessary to replace a majority of our
directors.
|
|
|
|
Our bylaws contain advance notice
requirements. Our bylaws also provide that
any stockholder who wishes to bring business before an annual
meeting of our stockholders or to nominate candidates for
election as directors at an annual meeting of our stockholders
must deliver advance notice of their proposals to us before the
meeting. Such advance notice provisions may have the effect of
making it more difficult to introduce business at stockholder
meetings or nominate candidates for election as director.
|
|
|
|
Our certificate of incorporation requires supermajority
voting to approve a change of control
transaction. Seventy-five percent of our
outstanding shares entitled to vote are required to approve any
merger, consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of our
assets and similar transactions if the other party to such
transaction owns 5% or more of our shares entitled to vote. In
addition, a majority of the shares entitled to vote not owned by
such 5% or greater stockholder are also required to approve any
such transaction.
|
|
|
|
Amendments to our certificate of incorporation require
supermajority voting. Our certificate of
incorporation contains provisions that make its amendment
require the affirmative vote of both 75% of our outstanding
shares entitled to vote and a majority of the shares entitled to
vote not owned by any person who may hold 50% or more of our
shares unless the proposed amendment was previously recommended
to our stockholders by an affirmative vote of 75% of our Board.
This provision makes it more difficult to implement a change to
our certificate of incorporation that stockholders might
otherwise consider to be in their best interests without
approval of our Board.
|
|
|
|
Amendments to our bylaws require supermajority
voting. Although our Board of Directors is
permitted to amend our bylaws at any time, our stockholders may
only amend our bylaws upon the affirmative vote of both 75% of
our outstanding shares entitled to vote and a majority of the
shares entitled to vote not owned by any person who owns 50% or
more of our shares. This provision makes it more difficult for
our stockholders to implement a change they may consider to be
in their best interests without approval of our Board.
|
13
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
Not applicable.
Our corporate headquarters, located at 20 Florence Avenue,
Batavia, New York, consists of a 45,000 square foot
building. Our manufacturing facilities, also located in Batavia,
consist of approximately 33 acres and contain about
216,000 square feet in several connected buildings,
including 162,000 square feet in manufacturing facilities,
48,000 square feet for warehousing and a
6,000 square-foot building for product research and
development. We also lease approximately 15,000 square feet
of office space and 45,000 square feet of manufacturing
facilities for our subsidiary, Energy Steel, located in Lapeer,
Michigan. Additionally, we lease a U.S. sales office in
Houston and our Chinese subsidiary leases a sales and
engineering office in Suzhou, China.
We believe that our properties are generally in good condition,
are well maintained, and are suitable and adequate to carry on
our business.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
The information required by this Item 3 is contained in
Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements included
in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 4.
|
(Removed
and Reserved)
|
PART II
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Our common stock is traded on the NYSE Amex exchange under the
symbol GHM. As of May 27, 2011, there were
9,866 shares of our common stock outstanding that were held
by approximately 147 stockholders of record.
The following table shows the high and low per share prices of
our common stock for the periods indicated, as reported by the
NYSE Amex.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Fiscal year 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
19.60
|
|
|
$
|
13.50
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
17.99
|
|
|
|
13.52
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
21.00
|
|
|
|
14.75
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
24.58
|
|
|
|
19.08
|
|
Fiscal year 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
16.12
|
|
|
$
|
8.70
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
15.67
|
|
|
|
10.52
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
21.84
|
|
|
|
13.37
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
21.58
|
|
|
|
14.63
|
|
Subject to the rights of any preferred stock we may then have
outstanding, the holders of our common stock are entitled to
receive dividends as may be declared from time to time by our
Board of Directors out of funds legally available for the
payment of dividends. Dividends declared per share by our Board
of Directors for each of the four quarters of fiscal 2011 and
fiscal 2010 were $.02. There can be no assurance that we will
pay cash dividends in any future period or that the level of
cash dividends paid by us will remain constant.
14
Our senior credit facility contains provisions pertaining to the
maintenance of a maximum funded debt to earnings before interest
expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA,
ratio and a minimum earnings before interest expense and income
taxes to interest ratio as well as restrictions on the payment
of dividends to stockholders. The facility limits the payment of
dividends to stockholders to 25% of net income if our maximum
funded debt to EBITDA ratio is greater than 2.0 to 1. As of
March 31 and May 27, 2011, we did not have any funded debt
outstanding. More information regarding our senior credit
facility can be found in Note 7 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
We maintain a stock repurchase program that permits us to
repurchase up to 1,000 shares of our common stock either in
the open market or through privately negotiated transactions.
The stock repurchase program terminates at the earlier of the
expiration of the program on July 29, 2011, when all
1,000 shares have been repurchased or when the Board of
Directors terminates the program. We intend to use cash on hand
to fund any stock repurchases under the program. As of
March 31, 2011, 638 shares of our common stock remain
available for repurchase under the stock repurchase program.
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GRAHAM CORPORATION FIVE YEAR SUMMARY OF SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
(For Fiscal Years Ended March 31)
|
|
2011(2)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
74,235
|
|
|
$
|
62,189
|
|
|
$
|
101,111
|
|
|
$
|
86,428
|
|
|
$
|
65,822
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
21,851
|
|
|
|
22,231
|
|
|
|
41,712
|
|
|
|
34,162
|
|
|
|
16,819
|
|
Gross profit percentage
|
|
|
29.4
|
%
|
|
|
35.7
|
%
|
|
|
41.3
|
%
|
|
|
39.5
|
%
|
|
|
25.6
|
%
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
5,874
|
|
|
|
6,361
|
|
|
|
17,467
|
|
|
|
15,034
|
|
|
|
5,761
|
|
Cash dividends
|
|
|
790
|
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
754
|
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
Common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings from continuing operations per share
|
|
$
|
.59
|
|
|
$
|
.64
|
|
|
$
|
1.72
|
|
|
$
|
1.52
|
|
|
$
|
.59
|
|
Diluted earnings from continuing operations per share
|
|
|
.59
|
|
|
|
.64
|
|
|
|
1.71
|
|
|
|
1.49
|
|
|
|
.58
|
|
Stockholders equity per share
|
|
|
7.47
|
|
|
|
7.01
|
|
|
|
6.21
|
|
|
|
4.86
|
|
|
|
3.15
|
|
Dividends declared per share
|
|
|
.08
|
|
|
|
.08
|
|
|
|
.075
|
|
|
|
.05
|
|
|
|
.04
|
|
Market price range of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
24.58
|
|
|
|
21.84
|
|
|
|
54.91
|
|
|
|
30.48
|
|
|
|
9.20
|
|
Low
|
|
|
13.50
|
|
|
|
8.70
|
|
|
|
6.85
|
|
|
|
6.30
|
|
|
|
5.02
|
|
Average common shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
9,958
|
|
|
|
9,937
|
|
|
|
10,195
|
|
|
|
10,085
|
|
|
|
9,850
|
|
Financial data at March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents and investments
|
|
$
|
43,083
|
|
|
$
|
74,590
|
|
|
$
|
46,209
|
|
|
$
|
36,793
|
|
|
$
|
15,051
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
44,003
|
|
|
|
56,704
|
|
|
|
49,547
|
|
|
|
36,998
|
|
|
|
20,119
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
1,979
|
|
|
|
1,003
|
|
|
|
1,492
|
|
|
|
1,027
|
|
|
|
1,637
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
1,334
|
|
|
|
1,107
|
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
862
|
|
|
|
874
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
118,050
|
|
|
|
108,979
|
|
|
|
86,924
|
|
|
|
70,711
|
|
|
|
48,878
|
|
Long-term debt, including capital lease obligations
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
73,655
|
|
|
|
69,074
|
|
|
|
61,111
|
|
|
|
48,536
|
|
|
|
30,654
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Per share data has been adjusted to reflect the following stock
splits: (i) a
two-for-one
stock split declared on July 31, 2008, and (ii) a
five-for-four
stock split declared on October 26, 2007. Each such stock
split was paid in the form of a dividend. |
|
(2) |
|
The financial data presented for fiscal 2011 includes the
financial results of Energy Steel from the date of acquisition,
which was December 14, 2010. |
15
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Overview
We are a global designer and manufacturer of custom-engineered
ejectors, vacuum systems, condensers, liquid ring pump packages
and heat exchangers to the refining and petrochemical
industries, and a supplier of components and raw materials to
the nuclear power generating market. Our equipment is used in
critical applications in the petrochemical, oil refining and
electric power generation industries, including nuclear,
cogeneration and geothermal plants. Our equipment can also be
found in alternative energy applications, including ethanol,
biodiesel and coal and
gas-to-liquids
and other applications, and other diverse applications, such as
metal refining, pulp and paper processing, shipbuilding, water
heating, refrigeration, desalination, soap manufacturing, food
processing, pharmaceuticals, and heating, ventilating and air
conditioning.
Our corporate offices are located in Batavia, New York and we
have production facilities in both Batavia, New York and at
our wholly-owned subsidiary, Energy Steel, located in Lapeer,
Michigan. We also have a wholly-owned foreign subsidiary located
in Suzhou, China, which supports sales orders from China and
provides engineering support and supervision of subcontracted
fabrication.
In advancement of our strategy to diversify our products and
broaden our offerings to the energy industry, on
December 14, 2010, we acquired Energy Steel. This
transaction was accounted for under the acquisition method of
accounting. Accordingly, the results of Energy Steel were
included in our consolidated financial statements from the date
of acquisition.
Highlights
Highlights for our fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, which
we refer to as fiscal 2011, include:
|
|
|
|
|
Net income and income per diluted share for fiscal 2011, were
$5,874 and $0.59 compared with net income and income per diluted
share of $6,361 and $0.64 for fiscal year ended March 31,
2010, which we refer to as fiscal 2010. Excluding the
transaction costs related to the Energy Steel acquisition, net
income and income per diluted share was $6,407 and $.64 in
fiscal 2011.
|
|
|
|
Net sales for fiscal 2011 of $74,235 were up 19% compared with
$62,189 for fiscal 2010.
|
|
|
|
Orders received in fiscal 2011 of $63,222 were down 42% compared
with fiscal 2010, when orders were $108,317. Orders received in
fiscal 2011 included $6,104 associated with Energy Steel.
|
|
|
|
Backlog on March 31, 2011 of $91,096 was down 3% from
backlog of $94,255 on March 31, 2010. Included in backlog
at March 31, 2011 was $8,444 associated with Energy Steel.
|
|
|
|
Gross profit and operating margins for fiscal 2011 were 29.4%
and 11.8% compared with 35.7% and 16.1%, respectively, for
fiscal 2010.
|
|
|
|
Cash and short-term investments at March 31, 2011 were
$43,083 compared with $74,590 as of March 31, 2010, down
42%.
|
|
|
|
At fiscal year end, we had a solid balance sheet that was free
of bank debt and that provided financial flexibility.
|
Forward-Looking
Statements
This report and other documents we file with the Securities and
Exchange Commission include forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties
and other factors that may cause actual results to be materially
different from any future results implied by the forward-looking
statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the
risks and uncertainties identified by us under the heading
Risk Factors in
16
Item 1A and elsewhere in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Forward-looking statements may also include, but are not limited
to, statements about:
|
|
|
|
|
the current and future economic environments affecting us and
the markets we serve;
|
|
|
|
sources of revenue and anticipated revenue, including the
contribution from the growth of new products, services and
markets;
|
|
|
|
plans for future products and services and for enhancements to
existing products and services;
|
|
|
|
our operations in foreign countries;
|
|
|
|
our ability to integrate our acquisition of Energy Steel and
continue to pursue our acquisition and growth strategy;
|
|
|
|
estimates regarding our liquidity and capital requirements;
|
|
|
|
timing of conversion of backlog to sales;
|
|
|
|
our ability to attract or retain customers;
|
|
|
|
the outcome of any existing or future litigation; and
|
|
|
|
our ability to increase our productivity and capacity.
|
Forward-looking statements are usually accompanied by words such
as anticipate, believe,
estimate, may, intend,
expect and similar expressions. Actual results could
differ materially from historical results or those implied by
the forward-looking statements contained in this report.
Undue reliance should not be placed on our forward-looking
statements. Except as required by law, we undertake no
obligation to update or announce any revisions to
forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise.
Fiscal
2012 and Near-Term Market Conditions
The downturn in the global economy which commenced in fiscal
2008 led to reduced demand for petroleum-based products, which
in turn led our customers to defer investment in major capital
projects. We have seen an improved business environment over the
past few quarters and believe that we are in the early stages of
a business recovery. While there continues to be risks around a
global economic recovery, we believe current signs are more
positive than a year ago.
In addition, we believe that the significant increase in
construction costs, including raw material costs, which had
occurred over the
four-to-five-year
period prior to the recent downturn, also led to delays in new
commitments by our customers. The increase in costs resulted in
the economics of projects becoming less feasible. While some
material costs have improved, copper and steel are again
elevated and remain volatile.
Near-term demand trends that we believe are affecting our
customers investments include:
|
|
|
|
|
As the world recovers slowly from the global recession, many
emerging economies continue to have relatively strong economic
growth. This expansion is driving growing energy requirements
and the need for more refined petroleum products. Although
uncertainty in the capital markets continues, there has been
some improved access to capital, which has resulted in certain
previously stalled projects being released.
|
|
|
|
The expansion of the Middle Eastern economies and the continued
growth in demand for oil and refined products has renewed
investment activity in that area. The planned sequential project
activity for refineries is encouraging.
|
|
|
|
Asia, specifically China, began experiencing renewed demand for
refined petroleum products such as gasoline. This renewed demand
is driving increased investment in petrochemical and refining
projects.
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
South America, specifically Brazil, Venezuela and Colombia, is
seeing increased refining and petrochemical investments that are
driven by their expanding economies and increased local demand
for gasoline and other products that are made from oil as the
feedstock.
|
|
|
|
The U.S. refining market has exhibited recent improvement,
including near-term increases in orders of short cycle and spare
parts. Historically, these types of orders have suggested a
recovery, as delayed spending is released. We expect the
U.S. refining market will not return to the levels
experienced during the last upcycle, but will improve compared
with its levels over the past few years. We expect that the
U.S. refining markets will continue to be an important
aspect of our business.
|
|
|
|
Investments in North American oil sands projects have recently
increased, especially for extraction projects in Alberta and
foreign investment in Alberta which suggest that downstream
investments that involve our equipment might increase in the
next one to three years.
|
|
|
|
Investment in new nuclear power capacity may become subject to
increased uncertainty due to political and social pressures,
enhanced by the tragic earthquake and tsunami which occurred in
Japan in March 2011. However, the need for additional safety and
back up redundancies at existing plants could increase demand in
the near term.
|
We expect that the consequences of these near-term trends will
be more pressure on our pricing and gross margins, as the
U.S. refining market has historically provided higher
margins than certain international markets.
Because of continued global economic uncertainty and the risk
associated with growth in emerging economies, we also expect
that we will have continued volatility in our order pattern. We
continue to expect our new order levels to remain volatile,
resulting in both strong and weak quarters. For example,
sequentially the past eight quarters had new order levels of
$8,838, $29,567, $51,644, $18,268, $8,124, $10,476, $17,784, and
$26,838 in the first, second, third and fourth quarters of
fiscal 2010 and the first, second, third and fourth quarters of
fiscal 2011, respectively. For the next several quarters, we
also expect to see smaller value projects than what we had seen
during the last expansion cycle. This will require more orders
for us to achieve a similar revenue level. We believe that
looking at our order level in any one quarter does not provide
an accurate indication of our future expectations or
performance. Rather, we believe that looking at our orders and
backlog over a rolling four-quarter time period provides a
better measure of our business.
Mix
Shift: Stronger International Growth in Refining and Chemical
Processing with Domestic Growth in Nuclear Power and Navy
Projects
We expect growth in the refining and chemical processing markets
to be driven by emerging markets. We have also expanded our
addressable markets through the acquisition of Energy Steel and
our focus on U.S. Navy nuclear propulsion projects. We
believe our revenue opportunities will be equivalent between the
domestic and international markets.
Over the long-term, we expect our customers markets to
regain their strength and, while remaining cyclical, continue to
grow. We believe the long-term trends remain strong and that the
drivers of future growth include:
Demand
Trends
|
|
|
|
|
Global consumption of crude oil is estimated to expand
significantly over the next two decades, primarily in emerging
markets. This is expected to offset estimated flat to slightly
declining demand in North America and Europe.
|
|
|
|
Global oil refining capacity is projected to increase, and is
expected to be addressed through new facilities, refinery
upgrades, revamps and expansions.
|
|
|
|
Increased demand is expected for power, refinery and
petrochemical products, stimulated by an expanding middle class
in Asia.
|
|
|
|
Increased development of geothermal electrical power plants in
certain regions is expected to meet projected growth in demand
for electrical power.
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
Increased global regulations over the refining and petrochemical
industries are expected to continue to drive requirements for
capital investments.
|
|
|
|
Increased demand is expected from the nuclear power generation
industry.
|
|
|
|
Increased focus on safety and redundancy is anticipated in
existing nuclear power facilities.
|
|
|
|
Long-term increased project development of international nuclear
facilities is expected, despite the recent tragedy in Japan.
|
|
|
|
Construction of new petrochemical plants in the Middle East is
anticipated, where natural gas is plentiful and less expensive,
is expected to continue.
|
|
|
|
Increased investments in new power projects are expected in Asia
and South America to meet projected consumer demand increases.
|
|
|
|
Long-term growth potential is believed to exist in alternative
energy markets, such as
coal-to-liquids,
gas-to-liquids
and other emerging technologies, such as biodiesel, ethanol and
waste-to-energy.
|
|
|
|
Shale gas development and the resulting availability of
affordable natural gas as feedstock to
U.S.-based
chemical/petrochemical facilities is expected to lead to renewed
investment is chemical/petrochemical markets in the U.S.
|
We believe that all of the above factors offer us long-term
growth opportunity to meet our customers expected capital
project needs. In addition, we believe we can continue to grow
our less cyclical smaller product lines and aftermarket
businesses.
Emerging markets require petroleum-based products. These markets
are expected to continue to grow at rates faster than the
U.S. Therefore, we expect international opportunities will
be more plentiful relative to domestic projects for these
markets. We believe the domestic and international markets will
offer similar opportunities for us in the near term. Our
domestic sales as a percentage of aggregate product sales, which
had increased from 50% in fiscal 2007 to 54% in fiscal 2008 to
63% in fiscal 2009, decreased to 45% in each of fiscal 2010 and
fiscal 2011. Our order rates for fiscal 2011 were 48% domestic
and 52% international, compared with fiscal 2010, which were 50%
domestic and 50% international.
Results
of Operations
For an understanding of the significant factors that influenced
our performance, the following discussion should be read in
conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the
notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in
Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The following table summarizes our results of operations for the
periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
74,235
|
|
|
$
|
62,189
|
|
|
$
|
101,111
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
5,874
|
|
|
$
|
6,361
|
|
|
$
|
17,467
|
|
Diluted income per share
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
|
$
|
0.64
|
|
|
$
|
1.71
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
118,050
|
|
|
$
|
108,979
|
|
|
$
|
86,924
|
|
Fiscal
2011 Compared with Fiscal 2010
Sales for fiscal 2011 were $74,235, a 19% increase, as compared
with sales of $62,189 for fiscal 2010. The increase was driven
by our acquisition of Energy Steel and the improvement in our
base markets for petroleum-based products. Energy Steel
contributed $5,808, or 48% of the growth in fiscal 2011.
Domestic sales increased by $5,431 in fiscal 2011, driven by our
acquisition of Energy Steel. International sales accounted for
55% of all sales for fiscal 2011, the same as fiscal 2010.
International sales increased by $6,615 in fiscal 2011, with
increases in the Middle East and South America up $5,467 and
$4,723, respectively, partly offset by slower sales in Asia,
down $4,174. By market, sales for fiscal 2011 were 35% to the
refining industry (down from 41% in fiscal 2010), 22% to
19
the chemical and petrochemical industries (down from 35%) and
43% to other industrial applications (up from 24%), including
nuclear energy and the U.S. Navy.
Our gross margin for fiscal 2011 was 29.4% compared with 35.7%
for fiscal 2010. Gross margins in fiscal 2011 were impacted by
certain project wins, which occurred in late fiscal 2010 and
early fiscal 2011, during a period when pricing was extremely
competitive due to a small number of available opportunities. In
addition, fiscal 2010 margins, especially in the first half of
the year, benefitted from projects won late in the last upcycle.
Gross profit for fiscal 2011 decreased $380, compared with
fiscal 2010. Gross profit decreased due to a lower gross margin,
which was mostly offset by higher volume. Gross profit in fiscal
2011 was adversely impacted by inventory
step-up and
intangible asset amortization related to the Energy Steel
acquisition. These charges were $247 in fiscal 2011.
Selling, general and administrative, or SG&A, and other
expenses for fiscal 2011 were $13,076, up 7% compared with
$12,189 in fiscal 2010. The increase in SG&A was related to
our acquisition of Energy Steel, which had $764 of SG&A
(including $53 of intangible asset amortization costs) related
to post-acquisition operating costs. There were also $676 of
transaction costs related to the acquisition. SG&A,
excluding Energy Steel, decreased $553, driven by lower pension
and variable compensation costs. SG&A and other expenses as
a percentage of sales decreased in fiscal 2011 to 17.6% of sales
compared with 19.6% of sales in fiscal 2010.
Interest income for fiscal 2011 was $77, up from $55 in fiscal
2010. This increase was due to higher average levels of cash
during fiscal 2011 compared with fiscal 2010.
Interest expense was $92 in fiscal 2011, up from $36 in fiscal
2010. The increase was due to an interest charge for
unrecognized tax benefits.
Our effective tax rate in fiscal 2011 was 33% compared with an
effective tax rate of 37% for fiscal 2010. The tax rate in
fiscal 2011 was adversely affected by acquisition-related costs
which are not tax affected. Excluding the acquisition-related
tax impact, the effective tax rate in fiscal 2011 was 32%.
Included in fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 income tax expense was a
charge for unrecognized tax benefits of $32 and $445,
respectively, related to research and development tax credits
taken in tax years 2006 through 2010. Such charge is
managements estimate of our potential exposure related to
an ongoing Internal Revenue Service examination of our research
and development tax credits. We continue to believe our tax
position is correct and we intend to continue to vigorously
defend our position. Excluding the tax charge, our effective tax
rate in fiscal 2010 was 32.5%.
Net income for fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 was $5,874 and
$6,361, respectively. Income per diluted share was $0.59 and
$0.64 for the respective periods. Excluding the transaction
costs related to the Energy Steel acquisition, net income and
income per diluted share was $6,407 and $0.64 in fiscal 2011.
Fiscal
2010 Compared with Fiscal 2009
Sales for fiscal 2010 were $62,189, a 38% decrease, as compared
with sales of $101,111 for fiscal 2009. The decrease was due to
reduced demand for petroleum-based products as a result of the
economic downturn that commenced in fiscal 2008, which caused
our customers to defer investment in major capital projects.
This decline in sales occurred in all product lines.
International sales accounted for 55% of all sales for fiscal
2010, which were up from 37% in fiscal 2009. Domestic sales
decreased by $35,792 in fiscal 2010. International sales
declined $3,130 in fiscal 2010, driven by sales declines in
Canada, South America, the Middle East and Europe, somewhat
offset by higher sales in Asia and Africa. Sales for fiscal 2010
were 41% to the refining industry (down from 46% in fiscal
2009), 35% to the chemical and petrochemical industries (up from
27%) and 24% to other industrial applications (down from 27%),
including electrical power.
Our gross margin for fiscal 2010 was 35.7% compared with 41.3%
for fiscal 2009. Gross profit for fiscal 2010 decreased 47%, or
$19,481, compared with fiscal 2009. Gross profit decreased due
to lower volume, which resulted in the significant under
utilization of our production capacity. The lower volume and
utilization declines were partly offset by improved raw material
purchasing benefits, especially in the first and second quarters
of fiscal 2010, and continued improvements in productivity.
Selling, general and administrative, or SG&A, and other
expenses for fiscal 2010 were $12,189, down 21% compared with
$15,384 in fiscal 2009. Included in fiscal 2009 costs was a
pre-tax charge of $559 for restructuring
20
costs. SG&A and other expenses as a percentage of sales
increased in fiscal 2010 to 19.6% of sales compared with 15.2%
of sales in fiscal 2009. SG&A expenses decreased due to
lower variable costs (e.g., sales commissions, compensation,
headcount expenses) related to lower sales and cost controls in
place throughout fiscal 2010.
Interest income for fiscal 2010 was $55, down from $416 in
fiscal 2009. This decrease was due to lower rates of return on
our investments, which are primarily short-term
U.S. Treasury securities.
Interest expense was $36 in fiscal 2010, up from $5 in fiscal
2009. The increase was due to an interest charge of $32 for
unrecognized tax benefits, as discussed below, taken in fiscal
2010.
Our effective tax rate in fiscal 2010 was 37% compared with an
effective tax rate of 35% for fiscal 2009. The increase was due
to a charge for unrecognized tax benefits of $445 related to
research and development tax credits taken in tax years 2006
through 2010. Such charge is managements estimate of our
potential exposure related to an ongoing Internal Revenue
Service examination of our research and development tax credits.
We believe our tax position is correct and we intend to continue
to vigorously defend our position. Associated with the tax
charge was an interest charge of $32, as noted in the above
paragraph, and a $10 tax credit, related to such interest
charge. The combination of these charges and credit was a net
charge to earnings of $467 ($435 in taxes and $32 in interest),
which lowered our earnings per share in fiscal 2010 by $0.05 per
share. Excluding the tax charge, our effective tax rate in
fiscal 2010 was 32.5%. The total tax benefit related to the
research and development tax credit that is under review by the
IRS was $2,218 at March 31, 2010. In assessing the
realizability of deferred tax assets, management determined that
a portion of the deferred tax assets related to certain state
investment tax credits and net operating losses will not be
realized and a valuation allowance of $332 was recorded
resulting in an increase in the effective tax rate.
Net income for fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009 was $6,361 and
$17,467, respectively. Income per diluted share was $0.64 and
$1.71 for the respective periods.
Stockholders
Equity
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our
consolidated statements of changes in stockholders equity
that can be found in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
The following table shows the balance of stockholders
equity on the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
73,655
|
|
|
$
|
69,074
|
|
|
$
|
61,111
|
|
Fiscal
2011 Compared with Fiscal 2010
Stockholders equity increased $4,581 or 7%, at
March 31, 2011 compared with March 31, 2010. This
increase was primarily due to net income earned in fiscal 2011.
We repurchased 59 shares in fiscal 2011. A total of
362 shares have been repurchased, pursuant to our publicly
announced stock repurchase program. At March 31, 2011 and
May 27, 2011, the number of shares remaining that have been
approved for repurchase under the stock repurchase program is
638.
On March 31, 2010, our net book value was $7.47 up 7% over
March 31, 2010.
Fiscal
2010 Compared with Fiscal 2009
Stockholders equity increased $7,963 or 13%, at
March 31, 2010 compared with March 31, 2009. This
increase was primarily due to net income and an increase in the
value of pension assets. Dividends paid in fiscal 2010 increased
5%, to $788, due to a dividend increase which occurred in early
fiscal 2009. We repurchased 26 shares in fiscal 2010,
pursuant to our publicly announced stock repurchase program.
On March 31, 2010, our net book value was $7.01 up 13% over
March 31, 2009.
21
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our
consolidated statements of cash flows and consolidated balance
sheets appearing in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Cash and investments
|
|
$
|
43,083
|
|
|
$
|
74,590
|
|
Working capital(1)
|
|
|
44,003
|
|
|
|
56,704
|
|
Working capital ratio(1)
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Working capital equals current assets minus current liabilities.
Working capital ratio equals current assets divided by current
liabilities. |
We use the ratios described above to measure our liquidity and
overall financial strength.
As of March 31, 2011, our contractual and commercial
obligations for the next five fiscal years ending March 31 and
thereafter were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
1 − 3
|
|
|
3 − 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
$
|
169
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Operating leases(1)
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
691
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and postretirement benefits(2)
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
Accrued pension liability
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
Liability for unrecognized tax benefits
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
1,617
|
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,537
|
|
|
$
|
2,395
|
|
|
$
|
2,131
|
|
|
$
|
622
|
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For additional information, see Note 6 to the consolidated
financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts represent anticipated contributions during fiscal 2012
to our postretirement medical benefit plan, which provides
healthcare benefits for eligible retirees and eligible survivors
of retirees. On February 4, 2003, we terminated
postretirement healthcare benefits for our U.S. employees.
Benefits payable to retirees of record on April 1, 2003
remained unchanged. We expect to be required to make cash
contributions in connection with these plans beyond one year,
but such amounts cannot be estimated. No contributions are
expected to be made to our defined benefit pension plan for
fiscal 2012. |
Net cash used by operating activities for fiscal 2011 was
$10,369, compared with net cash provided of $30,270 for fiscal
2010. The largest changes, compared with fiscal 2010, were an
increase in unbilled revenue of $10,672 (compared with a
decrease of $7,407 in fiscal 2010) and a decrease in
customer deposits of $9,498 (compared with an increase of
$16,130 in fiscal 2010). The increase in unbilled revenue was
driven by timing of billings for a small number of projects,
while the customer deposits decrease was the reversal of a large
portion of the fiscal 2010 increase, which, in fiscal 2010,
resulted from major customers providing upfront negotiated cash
payments to assist in lowering the cost for us to complete their
projects. We expect the unbilled revenue to convert to accounts
receivable and then to cash in the first and second quarters of
fiscal 2012. The customer deposits will likely continue to
decrease throughout fiscal 2012, as the large payments received
in fiscal 2010 are used as planned to procure raw materials to
fulfill orders.
The main contributors to cash generation, which partly offset
the cash uses noted above, were net income, $5,874 and
depreciation and amortization, $1,941. Net working capital
(accounts receivable, inventory and accounts payable)
contributed $1,111.
22
Capital spending in fiscal 2011 was $1,979, up from $1,003 in
fiscal 2010, driven by an equipment investment to support the
Northrop Grumman order for the U.S. Navy. We used $874 to
purchase 59 shares of stock as part of our stock buyback
program in fiscal 2011, compared with $229 in fiscal 2010. In
addition, we paid $790 in dividends in fiscal 2011, up from $788
in fiscal 2010.
Cash and investments were $43,083 on March 31, 2011
compared with $74,590 on March 31, 2010, down 42%. The
largest components of cash usage were the purchase of Energy
Steel for $17,899, the items noted above, an unbilled revenue
increase of $10,672, and a decrease in customer deposits of
$9,498.
We invest net cash generated from operations in excess of cash
held for near-term needs in either a money market account or in
U.S. government instruments, generally with maturity
periods of up to 180 days. Our money market account is used
to securitize our outstanding letter of credits and allows us to
pay a lower cost on those letters of credit.
Capital expenditures in fiscal 2011 were 75% for plant machinery
and equipment and 25% for all other items. In excess of 40% of
our fiscal 2011 capital expenditures were related to the
Northrop Grumman project for the U.S. Navy won in fiscal
2010. Sixty-five percent of our capital spending was for
productivity improvements and the balance was primarily for
capitalized maintenance. Capital expenditures for fiscal 2012
are expected to be approximately $3,000 to $3,500. Over 85% of
our fiscal 2012 capital expenditures are expected to be for
machinery and equipment, with the remaining amounts to be used
for information technology and other items.
Our revolving credit facility with Bank of America, N.A.
provides us with a line of credit of $25,000, including letters
of credit and bank guarantees. In addition, the agreement allows
us to increase the line of credit, at our discretion, up to
another $25,000, for total availability of $50,000. Borrowings
under our credit facility are secured by all of our assets.
Letters of credit outstanding under our credit facility on
March 31, 2011 and 2010 were $13,751 and $9,584,
respectively. There were no other amounts outstanding on our
credit facility at March 31, 2011 and 2010. Our borrowing
rate as of March 31, 2010 was Bank of Americas prime
rate, or 3.25%. Availability under the line of credit was
$11,249 at March 31, 2011. We believe that cash generated
from operations, combined with our investments and available
financing capacity under our credit facility, will be adequate
to meet our cash needs for the immediate future.
Orders
and Backlog
Orders during fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 were $63,222 and
$108,317, respectively, representing a 42% decrease for fiscal
2011. Orders represent communications received from customers
requesting us to supply products and services. Revenue is
recognized on orders received in accordance with our revenue
recognition policy included in Note 1 to the consolidated
financial statements contained in Item 8 of Part II of
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Domestic orders were 48%, or $30,233, of our total orders and
international orders were 52%, or $32,989, of our total orders
in fiscal 2011. Domestic orders decreased by $24,040, or 44%,
primarily due to a larger order in fiscal 2010 (in excess of
$25,000) from Northrop Grumman to provide surface condensers for
the U.S. Navy. This was partly offset by the $6,104 of
orders received from Energy Steel in fiscal 2011. International
orders decreased by $21,055, or 39%, as strong orders for
refining in the Middle East did not repeat in fiscal 2011.
Middle East orders were down $21,134, or 85%, compared with
fiscal 2010. Orders from other international regions were flat
as weakness in China was offset by increases in the rest of
Asia, as well as Canada.
Backlog was $91,096 at March 31, 2011 compared with a
record $94,255 at March 31, 2010, a 3% decrease. Backlog is
defined by us as the total dollar value of orders received for
which revenue has not yet been recognized. All orders in backlog
represent orders from our traditional markets in established
product lines. Approximately 15% to 20% of orders currently in
backlog are not expected to be converted to sales within the
next twelve months. At March 31, 2011, approximately 34% of
our backlog was attributed to equipment for refinery project
work, 11% for chemical and petrochemical projects, and 55% for
other industrial or commercial applications (including the
Northrop Grumman order for the U.S. Navy and all Energy
Steel orders). At March 31, 2010, approximately 37% of our
backlog was for refinery project work, 15% for chemical and
petrochemical projects, and 48% for other industrial or
commercial applications.
23
In fiscal 2011, one order for $1,588, which had been placed on
hold by our customer in fiscal 2009, was cancelled. All other
orders which were previously on hold by our customers have now
been released; the last order on hold for $1,130 was released
subsequent to the end of the year.
Outlook
We believe that we are in the early stages of a recovery in the
refinery and petrochemical markets. We also believe the improved
strength of the alternative energy markets, including the
nuclear market, will continue into fiscal 2012. We experienced
significant organic order growth in the second half of fiscal
2011, supplemented by our acquisition of Energy Steel. We
believe that, with our current backlog of $91,096, improved
order levels in the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2011 and
strong pipeline, our recovery will continue into fiscal 2012. We
expect revenue to increase 30% to 40%, to $95 to
$105 million, in fiscal 2012. Approximately, 16% to 20% of
our revenue is expected to come from Energy Steel. In fiscal
2011, Energy Steel contributed 8% of our revenue, as we
completed our acquisition late in the third quarter of fiscal
2011. For the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, Energy Steel
contributed 19.7% of our revenue. Our backlog on March 31,
2011 was $91,096. Order levels in the second half of fiscal 2011
were $44,622, compared with $18,600 in the first half of fiscal
2011. Included in the second half figures was $6,104 of orders
from Energy Steel. We expect fiscal 2012 order levels to
continue to be variable across the year, though we are
optimistic that orders will be more similar to the second half
of fiscal 2011 than the first half of the year. We continue to
expect a stronger international market, with pockets of strength
in the U.S., especially in alternative energy, including nuclear
business.
Normally, we convert 85% to 90% of our existing backlog to sales
within a
12-month
period. However, the Northrop Grumman for the U.S. Navy
project currently in our backlog will convert to revenue over
the next three fiscal years, with the majority of the revenue
occurring in fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2013. Therefore, our
March 31, 2011 backlog will extend beyond our historical
level. We expect to convert approximately 80% to 85% of our
March 31, 2011 backlog to sales in fiscal 2012.
For fiscal 2012, we expect sales to be less variable by quarter
than in fiscal 2011. In fiscal 2011, fourth quarter sales were
nearly double the level of sales in the first quarter. Our
expected growth range for fiscal 2012 assumes conversion of
backlog as well as continued market improvement and investment
by our customers. The upper end of the range, and above, may be
achieved by acceleration of projects by refining and
petrochemical and alternative energy end users, our historical
customer base. In addition, increased focus on safety and
redundancy projects at U.S. nuclear facilities may drive
near term opportunities at Energy Steel. We do, however,
anticipate more revenue concentration in fiscal 2012 than in
prior years. Two orders, the U.S. Navy project and a Middle
East refinery project, are expected to account for approximately
25% of fiscal 2012 revenue. Any unexpected delay in either of
these projects could impact fiscal 2012 revenue and earnings.
We expect gross profit margin in fiscal 2012 to be in the 29% to
32% range. This margin level represents an increase from fiscal
2011, which included some lower margin projects won during the
depths of the downturn in our markets. While we still have a few
lower margin projects in our backlog, the overall margin within
our backlog has improved compared with the start of fiscal 2011.
We expect that the current shift of business in the refining and
petrochemical market toward international markets, where margins
are generally lower than domestic project margins will have the
effect of reducing our margins. In addition, at the start of a
recovery we have historically experienced margins that are
somewhat muted compared to later on in a recovery.
Gross profit margins are expected to improve with anticipated
volume increases throughout fiscal 2012 and beyond. Due to
changes in geographical markets and end use markets, we expect
gross margins are unlikely to reach the 40% range achieved in
the prior up cycle. We believe long term upcycle gross profit
margin percentage in the
mid-to-upper
30s is a more realistic expectation. We also expect this
recovery will continue to be more focused on emerging markets,
which historically have lower margins and more competitive
pricing than developed markets.
We believe achievement of the upper end of our margin
projections, and potential upside above the range, can occur if
we experience: (i) increased volume that increases
utilization of capacity; (ii) continued improvements in our
manufacturing productivity; and/or (iii) expanded margin
opportunities at Energy Steel.
24
SG&A spending is expected to increase during fiscal 2012 to
between $16,500 and $17,500. This includes the full year impact
of Energy Steel (compared with
31/2
months in fiscal 2011). In addition to Energy Steel, we continue
to invest in personnel as we prepare for increased opportunities
in fiscal 2012 and beyond. Our effective tax rate during fiscal
2012 is expected to be between 33% and 35%.
Cash flow in fiscal 2012 is expected to be positive, driven by
improved net income and despite the significant increase in
revenue, the minimal need for additional working capital. We
also expect to see reductions in unbilled revenue, partly offset
by the drawdown of customer deposits which have been high since
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010.
Contingencies
and Commitments
We have been named as a defendant in certain lawsuits alleging
personal injury from exposure to asbestos contained in our
products. We are a co-defendant with numerous other defendants
in these lawsuits and intend to vigorously defend against these
claims. The claims are similar to previous asbestos lawsuits
that named us as a defendant. Such previous lawsuits either were
dismissed when it was shown that we had not supplied products to
the plaintiffs places of work or were settled by us for
amounts below expected defense costs. Neither the outcome of
these lawsuits nor the potential for liability can be determined
at this time.
From time to time in the ordinary course of business, we are
subject to legal proceedings and potential claims. As of
March 31, 2011, other than noted above, we were unaware of
any other material litigation matters.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations are based upon the consolidated financial
statements and the notes to consolidated financial statements
included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the U.S.
Critical accounting policies are defined as those that reflect
significant judgments and uncertainties, and could potentially
result in materially different results under different
assumptions and conditions.
Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue on
all contracts with a planned manufacturing process in excess of
four weeks (which approximates 575 direct labor hours) using the
percentage-of-completion
method. The
percentage-of-completion
method is determined by comparing actual labor incurred as of a
specific date to our estimate of the total labor to be incurred
on each contract. Contracts in progress are reviewed monthly,
and sales and earnings are adjusted in current accounting
periods based on revisions in the contract value and estimated
material and labor costs at completion. Losses on contracts are
recognized immediately, when evident to management.
Revenue on contracts not accounted for using the
percentage-of-completion
method is recognized utilizing the completed contract method.
The majority of the contracts we enter into have a planned
manufacturing process of less than four weeks and the results
reported under this method do not vary materially from the
percentage-of-completion
method. We recognize revenue and all related costs on the
completed contract method upon substantial completion or
shipment of products to the customer. Substantial completion is
consistently defined as at least 95% complete with regard to
direct labor hours. Customer acceptance is required throughout
the construction process and we have no further material
obligations under the contracts after the revenue is recognized.
Business Combinations and Intangible
Assets. Assets and liabilities acquired in a
business combination are recorded at their estimated fair values
at the acquisition date. The fair value of identifiable
intangible assets is based upon detailed valuations that use
various assumptions made by management. Goodwill is recorded
when the purchase price exceeds the estimated fair value of the
net identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired.
Definite lived intangible assets are amortized over their
estimated useful lives and are assessed for impairment if
certain indicators are present. Goodwill and intangible assets
deemed to have indefinite lives are not amortized but are
subject to impairment testing annually or earlier if an event or
change in circumstances indicates that the fair value of a
reporting unit may have been reduced below its carrying value.
25
Pension and Postretirement Benefits. Defined
benefit pension and other postretirement benefit costs and
obligations are dependent on actuarial assumptions used in
calculating such amounts. These assumptions are reviewed
annually and include the discount rate, long-term expected rate
of return on plan assets, salary growth, healthcare cost trend
rate and other economic and demographic factors. We base the
discount rate assumption for our plans on Moodys or
Citigroup Pension Liability Index AA-rated corporate long-term
bond yield rate. The long-term expected rate of return on plan
assets is based on the plans asset allocation, historical
returns and expectations as to future returns that are expected
to be realized over the estimated remaining life of the plan
liabilities that will be funded with the plan assets. The salary
growth assumptions are determined based on long-term actual
experience and future and near-term outlook. The healthcare cost
trend rate assumptions are based on historical cost and payment
data, the near-term outlook, and an assessment of likely
long-term trends.
Income Taxes. We use the liability method to
account for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax
liabilities and assets are recognized for the tax effects of
temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax
bases of liabilities and assets measured using the enacted tax
rate.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based
on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases
of assets and liabilities using current tax rates. We evaluate
available information about future taxable income and other
possible sources of realization of deferred income tax assets
and record valuation allowances to reduce deferred income tax
assets to an amount that represents our best estimates of the
amounts of such deferred income tax assets that more likely than
not will be realized.
The calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with
uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations.
Significant judgment is required in evaluating our tax positions
and determining our provision for income taxes. During the
ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and
calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is
uncertain. We establish reserves for uncertain tax positions
when we believe that certain tax positions do not meet the more
likely than not threshold. We adjust these reserves in light of
changing facts and circumstances, such as the outcome of a tax
audit or the lapse of the statute of limitations. The provision
for income taxes includes the impact of reserve provisions and
changes to the reserves that are considered appropriate.
The Company is currently under examination by the United States
Internal Revenue Service (the IRS) for tax years
2009 and 2010. The IRS has completed its examination for tax
years 2006 through 2008. In June 2010, the IRS proposed an
adjustment, plus interest, to disallow substantially all of the
research and development tax credit claimed by the Company in
tax years 2006 through 2008. The Company filed a protest to
appeal the adjustment in July 2010. A liability for unrecognized
tax benefits related to this tax position was recorded at
March 31, 2011 and 2010.
Critical
Accounting Estimates and Judgments
We have evaluated the accounting policies used in the
preparation of the consolidated financial statements and the
notes to consolidated financial statements included in
Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and believe those policies to be reasonable and appropriate.
We believe that the most critical accounting estimates used in
the preparation of our consolidated financial statements relate
to labor hour estimates used to recognize revenue under the
percentage-of-completion
method, fair value estimates of identifiable tangible and
intangible assets acquired in business combinations, accounting
for contingencies, under which we accrue a loss when it is
probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can
be reasonably estimated, and accounting for pensions and other
postretirement benefits.
As discussed above under the heading Critical Accounting
Policies, we recognize a substantial amount of our revenue
using the
percentage-of-completion
method. The key estimate of
percentage-of-completion
accounting is total labor to be incurred on each contract and to
the extent that this estimate changes, it may significantly
impact revenue recognized in each period.
We base the fair value of identifiable tangible and intangible
assets on detailed valuations that use information and
assumptions provided by management. The fair values of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed are determined using one
of three valuation approaches: market, income or cost. The
selection of a particular method
26
for a given asset depends on the reliability of available data
and the nature of the asset. The market approach values the
asset based on available market pricing for comparable assets.
The income approach values the asset based on the present value
of cash flows projected to be generated by that asset. The
projected cash flows are discounted at a required rate of return
that reflects the relative risk of the transaction and the time
value of money. The projected cash flows for each asset
considers multiple factors, including current revenue from
existing customers, the high cost barrier to entry of markets,
and expected profit margins giving consideration to historical
and expected margins. The cost approach values the asset by
determining the current cost of replacing that asset with
another of equivalent economic utility. The cost to replace the
asset reflects the replacement cost, less an allowance for loss
in value due to deprecation or obsolescence, with specific
consideration given to economic obsolescence if indicated.
Contingencies, by their nature, relate to uncertainties that
require us to exercise judgment both in assessing the likelihood
that a liability has been incurred as well as in estimating the
amount of potential loss. For more information on these matters
see the notes to consolidated financial statements included in
Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Accounting for pensions and other postretirement benefits
involves estimating the cost of benefits to be provided well
into the future and attributing that cost over the time period
each employee works. To accomplish this, extensive use is made
of assumptions about inflation, investment returns, mortality,
turnover, medical costs and discount rates. These assumptions
are reviewed annually.
The discount rate used in accounting for pensions and other
postretirement benefits is determined in conjunction with our
actuary by reference to a current yield curve and by considering
the timing and amount of projected future benefit payments. The
discount rate assumption for fiscal 2011 is 6.07% for our
defined benefit pension and 5.15% for our other postretirement
benefit plan. A reduction in the discount rate of 50 basis
points, with all other assumptions held constant, would have
increased fiscal 2011 net periodic benefit expense for our
defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plan by
approximately $182 and $0, respectively.
The expected return on plan assets assumption of 8.5% used in
accounting for our pension plan is determined by evaluating the
mix of investments that comprise plan assets and external
forecasts of future long-term investment returns. A reduction in
the rate of return of 50 basis points, with other
assumptions held constant, would have increased fiscal
2011 net periodic pension expense by approximately $147.
As part of our ongoing financial reporting process, a
collaborative effort is undertaken involving our managers with
functional responsibilities for financial, credit, tax,
engineering, manufacturing and benefit matters, and outside
advisors such as lawyers, consultants and actuaries. We believe
that the results of this effort provide management with the
necessary information on which to base their judgments and to
develop the estimates and assumptions used to prepare the
financial statements.
We believe that the amounts recorded in the consolidated
financial statements included in Item 8 of Part II of
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
related to revenue, contingencies, pensions, other post
retirement benefits and other matters requiring the use of
estimates and judgments are reasonable, although actual outcomes
could differ materially from our estimates.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In the normal course of business, management evaluates all new
accounting pronouncements issued by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board, the SEC, the Emerging Issues Task Force, the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants or other
authoritative accounting bodies to determine the potential
impact they may have on our consolidated financial statements.
Based upon this review, management does not expect any of the
recently issued accounting pronouncements, which have not
already been adopted, to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
Off
Balance Sheet Arrangements
We did not have any off balance sheet arrangements as of
March 31, 2011 or March 31, 2010, other than operating
leases and letters of credit.
27
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
The principal market risks (i.e., the risk of loss arising from
market changes) to which we are exposed are foreign currency
exchange rates, price risk and project cancellation risk.
The assumptions applied in preparing the following qualitative
and quantitative disclosures regarding foreign currency exchange
rate, price risk and project cancellation risk are based upon
volatility ranges experienced by us in relevant historical
periods, our current knowledge of the marketplace, and our
judgment of the probability of future volatility based upon the
historical trends and economic conditions of the markets in
which we operate.
Foreign
Currency
International consolidated sales for fiscal 2011 were 55% of
total sales, the same as for fiscal 2010. Operating in markets
throughout the world exposes us to movements in currency
exchange rates. Currency movements can affect sales in several
ways, the foremost being our ability to compete for orders
against foreign competitors that base their prices on relatively
weaker currencies. Business lost due to competition for orders
against competitors using a relatively weaker currency cannot be
quantified. In addition, cash can be adversely impacted by the
conversion of sales made by us in a foreign currency to
U.S. dollars. In each of fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010, and
fiscal 2009, all sales for which we or our subsidiaries were
paid were denominated in the local currency (U.S. dollars
or RMB). At certain times, we may enter into forward foreign
currency exchange agreements to hedge our exposure against
potential unfavorable changes in foreign currency values on
significant sales contracts negotiated in foreign currencies.
We have limited exposure to foreign currency purchases. In
fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, our purchases in
foreign currencies represented 1%, 1% and 2%, respectively, of
the cost of products sold. At certain times, we may utilize
forward foreign currency exchange contracts to limit currency
exposure. Forward foreign currency exchange contracts were not
used in fiscal 2011 or fiscal 2010, and as of March 31,
2011 and 2010, respectively, we held no forward foreign currency
contracts.
Price
Risk
Operating in a global marketplace requires us to compete with
other global manufacturers which, in some instances, benefit
from lower production costs and more favorable economic
conditions. Although we believe that our customers differentiate
our products on the basis of our manufacturing quality and
engineering experience and excellence, among other things, such
lower production costs and more favorable economic conditions
mean that certain of our competitors are able to offer products
similar to ours at lower prices. Moreover, the cost of metals
and other materials used in our products have experienced
significant volatility. Such factors, in addition to the global
effects of the recent volatility and disruption of the capital
and credit markets, have resulted in downward demand and pricing
pressure on our products.
Project
Cancellation and Project Continuation Risk
Economic conditions over the past few years have led to a higher
likelihood of project cancellation by our customers. We had one
project for $1,588 cancelled in the first quarter of fiscal
2011. We also had one project for $519 cancelled in fiscal 2010.
Our last project on hold, in the amount of $1,130, was released
in April 2011. Currently, we have no projects on hold. We
attempt to mitigate the risk of cancellation by structuring
contracts with our customers to maximize the likelihood that
progress payments made to us for individual projects cover the
costs we have incurred. As a result, we do not believe we have a
significant cash exposure to projects which may be cancelled.
Open orders are reviewed continuously through communications
with customers. If it becomes evident to us that a project is
delayed well beyond its original shipment date, management will
move the project into placed on hold (i.e.,
suspended) category. Furthermore, if a project is cancelled by
our customer, it is removed from our backlog.
28
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
INDEX TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Graham Corporation
|
|
Page
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
29
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands,
|
|
|
|
except per share data)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
74,235
|
|
|
$
|
62,189
|
|
|
$
|
101,111
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
52,137
|
|
|
|
39,958
|
|
|
|
59,399
|
|
Cost of goods sold amortization
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of goods sold
|
|
|
52,384
|
|
|
|
39,958
|
|
|
|
59,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
21,851
|
|
|
|
22,231
|
|
|
|
41,712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses and income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
13,009
|
|
|
|
12,081
|
|
|
|
14,813
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(416
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Other expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expenses and income
|
|
|
13,091
|
|
|
|
12,170
|
|
|
|
14,973
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
8,760
|
|
|
|
10,061
|
|
|
|
26,739
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
2,886
|
|
|
|
3,700
|
|
|
|
9,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
5,874
|
|
|
$
|
6,361
|
|
|
$
|
17,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
.59
|
|
|
$
|
.64
|
|
|
$
|
1.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
.59
|
|
|
$
|
.64
|
|
|
$
|
1.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
9,919
|
|
|
|
9,899
|
|
|
|
10,134
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
9,958
|
|
|
|
9,937
|
|
|
|
10,195
|
|
Dividends declared per share
|
|
$
|
.08
|
|
|
$
|
.08
|
|
|
$
|
.075
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
30
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
19,565
|
|
|
$
|
4,530
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
23,518
|
|
|
|
70,060
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowances
($26 and $17 at March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively)
|
|
|
8,681
|
|
|
|
7,294
|
|
Unbilled revenue
|
|
|
14,280
|
|
|
|
3,039
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
8,257
|
|
|
|
6,098
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
Deferred income tax asset
|
|
|
1,906
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
76,631
|
|
|
|
91,672
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
11,705
|
|
|
|
9,769
|
|
Prepaid pension asset
|
|
|
6,680
|
|
|
|
7,335
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
7,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
Permits
|
|
|
10,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
5,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
118,050
|
|
|
$
|
108,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
9,948
|
|
|
|
6,623
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
4,580
|
|
|
|
4,010
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
3,427
|
|
|
|
2,041
|
|
Customer deposits
|
|
|
12,854
|
|
|
|
22,022
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
1,772
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
Deferred income tax liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
32,628
|
|
|
|
34,968
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
Deferred income tax liability
|
|
|
8,969
|
|
|
|
2,930
|
|
Accrued pension liability
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
892
|
|
|
|
880
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
1,297
|
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
44,395
|
|
|
|
39,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized, 500 shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.10 par value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized, 25,500 shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued, 10,216 and 10,155 shares at March 31, 2011 and
2010, respectively
|
|
|
1,022
|
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
16,322
|
|
|
|
15,459
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
64,623
|
|
|
|
59,539
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(5,012
|
)
|
|
|
(4,386
|
)
|
Treasury stock (350 and 305 shares at March 31, 2011
and 2010, respectively)
|
|
|
(3,300
|
)
|
|
|
(2,554
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
73,655
|
|
|
|
69,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
118,050
|
|
|
$
|
108,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
31
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
5,874
|
|
|
$
|
6,361
|
|
|
$
|
17,467
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used) provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
1,334
|
|
|
|
1,107
|
|
|
|
993
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost and actuarial
losses
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
678
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
Discount accretion on investments
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(397
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
Loss on disposal or sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(923
|
)
|
|
|
(4,568
|
)
|
|
|
6,022
|
|
(Increase) decrease in operating assets, net of acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
(299
|
)
|
|
|
(1,941
|
)
|
Unbilled revenue
|
|
|
(10,672
|
)
|
|
|
7,407
|
|
|
|
(1,675
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(1,723
|
)
|
|
|
(1,433
|
)
|
|
|
132
|
|
Income taxes receivable/payable
|
|
|
1,703
|
|
|
|
4,122
|
|
|
|
(2,552
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current and non-current assets
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
90
|
|
Prepaid pension asset
|
|
|
(776
|
)
|
|
|
(245
|
)
|
|
|
(7,677
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities, net of acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
2,679
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Accrued compensation, accrued expenses and other current and
non-current liabilities
|
|
|
461
|
|
|
|
(401
|
)
|
|
|
260
|
|
Customer deposits
|
|
|
(9,498
|
)
|
|
|
16,130
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
Long-term portion of accrued compensation, accrued pension
liability and accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used) provided by operating activities
|
|
|
(10,369
|
)
|
|
|
30,270
|
|
|
|
11,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(1,979
|
)
|
|
|
(1,003
|
)
|
|
|
(1,492
|
)
|
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Purchase of investments
|
|
|
(155,717
|
)
|
|
|
(182,481
|
)
|
|
|
(142,601
|
)
|
Redemption of investments at maturity
|
|
|
202,310
|
|
|
|
153,530
|
|
|
|
136,620
|
|
Acquisition of Energy Steel & Supply Company (See
Note 2)
|
|
|
(17,899
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided ( used) by investing activities
|
|
|
26,729
|
|
|
|
(29,945
|
)
|
|
|
(7,472
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
822
|
|
|
|
2,927
|
|
Principal repayments on long-term debt
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
(861
|
)
|
|
|
(2,955
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
695
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(790
|
)
|
|
|
(788
|
)
|
|
|
(754
|
)
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(874
|
)
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|
|
(2,303
|
)
|
Excess tax deduction on stock awards
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
1,696
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by financing activities
|
|
|
(1,376
|
)
|
|
|
(948
|
)
|
|
|
(689
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
15,035
|
|
|
|
(620
|
)
|
|
|
3,038
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
4,530
|
|
|
|
5,150
|
|
|
|
2,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
19,565
|
|
|
$
|
4,530
|
|
|
$
|
5,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
32
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Capital in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
Excess of
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Par Value
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Loss(1)
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Receivable
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at April 1, 2008
|
|
|
4,990,945
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
12,674
|
|
|
|
37,253
|
|
|
|
(2,363
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
48,030
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,467
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
Pension and other postretirement benefits adjustments, net of
income tax of $2,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,244
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,244
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,370
|
|
Issuance of shares
|
|
|
72,659
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
695
|
|
Stock award tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,696
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(754
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(754
|
)
|
Two-for-one
stock split
|
|
|
5,063,604
|
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
(506
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognition of equity-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,303
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,303
|
)
|
Collection of notes receivable from officers and directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
10,127,208
|
|
|
|
1,013
|
|
|
|
14,923
|
|
|
|
53,966
|
|
|
|
(6,460
|
)
|
|
|
(2,325
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
61,111
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,361
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Pension and other postretirement benefits adjustments, net of
income tax of $1,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,435
|
|
Issuance of shares
|
|
|
27,896
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
Stock award tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(788
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(788
|
)
|
Recognition of equity-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
Collection of notes receivable from officers and directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010
|
|
|
10,155,104
|
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|
15,459
|
|
|
|
59,539
|
|
|
|
(4,386
|
)
|
|
|
(2,554
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,074
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,874
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Pension and other postretirement benefits adjustments, net of
income tax of $502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(707
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(707
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,248
|
|
Issuance of shares
|
|
|
60,521
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
Stock award tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(790
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(790
|
)
|
Recognition of equity-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(874
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(874
|
)
|
Issuance of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2011
|
|
|
10,215,625
|
|
|
$
|
1,022
|
|
|
$
|
16,322
|
|
|
$
|
64,623
|
|
|
$
|
(5,012
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,300
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
73,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments were $300,
$219 and $217, accumulated pension benefit adjustments were
$(5,418), $(4,845) and $(7,074), and accumulated other
postretirement benefit adjustments were $106, $240 and $397 at
March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, net of tax. |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
33
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in
thousands, except per share data)
Note 1
The Company and Its Accounting Policies:
Graham Corporation (the Company), and its operating
subsidiaries, is a global designer, manufacturer and supplier of
vacuum and heat transfer equipment used in the chemical,
petrochemical, petroleum refining, and electric power generating
industries. The Company acquired Energy Steel and Supply Company
(Energy Steel) in December 2010. Energy Steel is a
nuclear code accredited fabrication and specialty machining
company which provides products to the nuclear industry. The
Companys significant accounting policies are set forth
below.
The Companys fiscal years ended March 31, 2011, 2010
and 2009 are referred to as fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal
2009, respectively.
Principles
of consolidation and use of estimates in the preparation of
financial statements
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Energy Steel and
Supply Company, located in Lapeer, Michigan, and Graham Vacuum
and Heat Transfer Technology (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., located in
China. All intercompany balances, transactions and profits are
eliminated in consolidation.
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements, as well as the related revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual amounts could
differ from those estimated.
Translation
of foreign currencies
Assets and liabilities of the Companys foreign subsidiary
are translated into U.S. dollars at currency exchange rates
in effect at year-end and revenues and expenses are translated
at average exchange rates in effect for the year. Gains and
losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included
in results of operations. The Companys sales and purchases
in foreign currencies are minimal. Therefore, foreign currency
transaction gains and losses are not significant. Gains and
losses resulting from translation of foreign subsidiary balance
sheets are included in a separate component of
stockholders equity. Translation adjustments are not
adjusted for income taxes since they relate to an investment,
which is permanent in nature.
Revenue
recognition
Percentage-of-Completion
Method
The Company recognizes revenue on all contracts with a planned
manufacturing process in excess of four weeks (which
approximates 575 direct labor hours) using the
percentage-of-completion
method. The majority of the Companys revenue is recognized
under this methodology. The Company has established the systems
and procedures essential to developing the estimates required to
account for contracts using the
percentage-of-completion
method. The
percentage-of-completion
method is determined by comparing actual labor incurred to a
specific date to managements estimate of the total labor
to be incurred on each contract.
Contracts in progress are reviewed monthly, and sales and
earnings are adjusted in current accounting periods based on
revisions in the contract value and estimated costs at
completion. Losses on contracts are recognized immediately when
evident to management. Revenue recognized on contracts accounted
for utilizing
percentage-of-completion
are presented in net sales in the Consolidated Statement of
Operations and unbilled revenue in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets to the extent that the revenue recognized exceeds the
amounts billed to customers. See Inventories below.
34
Completed Contract Method
Revenue on contracts not accounted for using the
percentage-of-completion
method is recognized utilizing the completed contract method.
The majority of the Companys contracts have a planned
manufacturing process of less than four weeks and the results
reported under this method do not vary materially from the
percentage-of-completion
method. The Company recognizes revenue and all related costs on
these contracts upon substantial completion or shipment to the
customer. Substantial completion is consistently defined as at
least 95% complete with regard to direct labor hours. Customer
acceptance is generally required throughout the construction
process and the Company has no further obligations under the
contract after the revenue is recognized.
Cash and
cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and highly liquid,
short-term investments with maturities at the time of purchase
of three months or less.
Shipping
and handling fees and costs
Shipping and handling fees billed to the customer are recorded
in net sales and the related costs incurred for shipping and
handling are included in cost of products sold.
Investments
Investments consist of fixed-income debt securities issued by
the U.S. Treasury with original maturities of greater than
three months and less than one year. All investments are
classified as
held-to-maturity,
as the Company believes it has the intent and ability to hold
the securities to maturity. The investments are stated at
amortized cost which approximates fair value. All investments
held by the Company at March 31, 2011 are scheduled to
mature between April 7 and July 28, 2011.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, using the
average cost method. For contracts accounted for on the
completed contract method, progress payments received are netted
against inventory to the extent the payment is less than the
inventory balance relating to the applicable contract. Progress
payments that are in excess of the corresponding inventory
balance are presented as customer deposits in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. Unbilled revenue in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets represents revenue recognized that has not been billed to
customers on contracts accounted for on the
percentage-of-completion
method. For contracts accounted for on the
percentage-of-completion
method, progress payments are netted against unbilled revenue to
the extent the payment is less than the unbilled revenue for the
applicable contract. Progress payments exceeding unbilled
revenue are netted against inventory to the extent the payment
is less than or equal to the inventory balance relating to the
applicable contract, and the excess is presented as customer
deposits in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
A summary of costs and estimated earnings on contracts in
progress at March 31, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Costs incurred since inception on contracts in progress
|
|
$
|
24,572
|
|
|
$
|
7,096
|
|
Estimated earnings since inception on contracts in progress
|
|
|
9,612
|
|
|
|
2,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,184
|
|
|
|
10,044
|
|
Less billings to date
|
|
|
40,320
|
|
|
|
30,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (over) under billings
|
|
$
|
(6,136
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,666
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
The above activity is included in the accompanying Consolidated
Balance Sheets under the following captions at March 31,
2011 and 2010 or Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Unbilled revenue
|
|
$
|
14,280
|
|
|
$
|
3,039
|
|
Progress payments reducing inventory (Note 3)
|
|
|
(7,562
|
)
|
|
|
(1,683
|
)
|
Customer deposits
|
|
|
(12,854
|
)
|
|
|
(22,022
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (over) under billings
|
|
$
|
(6,136
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,666
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property,
plant, equipment and depreciation
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost net of
accumulated depreciation and amortization. Major additions and
improvements are capitalized, while maintenance and repairs are
charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation and amortization
are provided based upon the estimated useful lives, or lease
term if shorter, under the straight line method. Estimated
useful lives range from approximately five to eight years for
office equipment, eight to twenty-five years for manufacturing
equipment and forty years for buildings and improvements. Upon
sale or retirement of assets, the cost and related accumulated
depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting
gain or loss is included in the results of operations.
Business
combinations
The Company records its business combinations under the
acquisition method of accounting. Under the acquisition method
of accounting, the Company allocates the purchase price of each
acquisition to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets
acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective fair
values at the date of acquisition. The fair value of
identifiable intangible assets is based upon detailed valuations
that use various assumptions made by management. Any excess of
the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and
intangible assets acquired is allocated to goodwill. Direct
acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred.
Intangible
assets
Acquired intangible assets other than goodwill consist of
permits, customer relationships, tradenames and backlog. The
Company amortizes its definite-lived intangible assets on a
straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. Estimated
useful lives are six months for backlog and fifteen years for
customer relationships. All other intangibles have indefinite
lives and are not amortized.
Impairment
of long-lived assets
The Company assesses the impairment of definite-lived long-lived
assets or asset groups when events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors
that are considered in deciding when to perform an impairment
review include: a significant decrease in the market price of
the asset or asset group; a significant adverse change in the
extent or manner in which a long-lived asset or asset group is
being used or in its physical condition; an accumulation of
costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected
for the acquisition or construction; a current-period operating
or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash
flow losses or a projection or forecast that demonstrates
continuing losses associated with the use of a long-lived asset
or asset group; or a current expectation that, more likely than
not, a long-lived asset or asset group will be sold or otherwise
disposed of significantly before the end of its previously
estimated useful life. The term more likely than not refers to a
level of likelihood that is more than 50 percent.
Recoverability potential is measured by comparing the carrying
amount of the asset or asset group to its related total future
undiscounted cash flows. If the carrying value is not
recoverable through related cash flows, the asset or asset group
is considered to be impaired. Impairment is measured by
comparing the asset or asset groups carrying amount to its
fair value. When it is determined that useful lives of assets
are shorter than originally estimated, and no impairment is
present, the rate of depreciation is accelerated in order to
fully depreciate the assets over their new shorter useful lives.
36
Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested
annually for impairment. The Company assesses goodwill for
impairment by comparing the fair value of its reporting units to
their carrying amounts. If the fair value of a reporting unit is
less than its carrying value, an impairment loss is recorded to
the extent that the implied fair value of the goodwill within
the reporting unit is less than its carrying value. Fair values
for reporting units are determined based on discounted cash
flows and market multiples. Indefinite lived intangible assets
are assessed for impairment by comparing the fair value of the
asset to its carrying value.
Product
warranties
The Company estimates the costs that may be incurred under its
product warranties and records a liability in the amount of such
costs at the time revenue is recognized. The reserve for product
warranties is based upon past claims experience and ongoing
evaluations of any specific probable claims from customers. A
reconciliation of the changes in the product warranty liability
is presented in Note 5.
Research
and development
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. The
Company incurred research and development costs of $2,576,
$3,824 and $3,347 in fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009,
respectively.
Income
taxes
The Company recognizes deferred income tax assets and
liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events
that have been recognized in the Companys financial
statements or tax returns. Deferred income tax assets and
liabilities are determined based on the difference between the
financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities
using currently enacted tax rates. The Company evaluates the
available evidence about future taxable income and other
possible sources of realization of deferred income tax assets
and records a valuation allowance to reduce deferred income tax
assets to an amount that represents the Companys best
estimate of the amount of such deferred income tax assets that
more likely than not will be realized.
The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions using a
more likely than not recognition threshold. The
evaluation of uncertain tax positions is based on factors
including, but not limited to, changes in tax law, the
measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in
tax returns, the effective settlement of matters subject to
audit, new audit activity and changes in facts or circumstances
related to a tax position. These tax positions are evaluated on
a quarterly basis. It is the Companys policy to recognize
any interest related to uncertain tax positions in interest
expense and any penalties related to uncertain tax positions in
selling, general and administrative expense.
The Company files federal and state income tax returns in
several U.S. and
non-U.S. domestic
and foreign jurisdictions. In most tax jurisdictions, returns
are subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities for a
number of years after the returns have been filed. The Company
is currently under examination by the U.S. Internal Revenue
Service for tax years 2006 through 2010.
Stock
splits
On July 31, 2008, the Companys Board of Directors
declared a
two-for-one
stock split of the Companys common shares and declared a
post-split quarterly cash dividend of $.02 per share, effective
for the dividend paid on October 6, 2008 to stockholders of
record on September 5, 2008. The
two-for-one
stock split was effected as a stock dividend, and stockholders
received one additional share of common stock for every share of
common stock held on the record date of September 5, 2008.
The new common shares were distributed on or about
October 6, 2008. The par value of the Companys common
stock, $.10, remained unchanged. All share and per share amounts
in periods prior to the stock split were adjusted to reflect the
two-for-one
stock split. The Statement of Stockholders Equity in
fiscal 2009 reflects the stock split by reclassifying from
Capital in excess of par value to Common
stock an amount equal to the par value of the additional
shares issued to effect the stock split.
37
Stock-based
compensation
The Company records compensation costs related to stock-based
awards based on the estimated fair value of the award on the
grant date. Compensation cost is recognized in the
Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations over the
applicable vesting period. The Company uses the Black-Scholes
valuation model as the method for determining the fair value of
its equity awards. For restricted stock awards, the fair market
value of the award is determined based upon the closing value of
the Companys stock price on the grant date. The amount of
stock-based compensation expense recognized during a period is
based on the portion of the awards that are ultimately expected
to vest. The Company estimates the forfeiture rate at the grant
date by analyzing historical data and revises the estimates in
subsequent periods if the actual forfeiture rate differs from
the estimates.
Income
per share data
Basic income per share is computed by dividing net income by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the
period. Common shares outstanding include share equivalent units
which are contingently issuable shares. Diluted income per share
is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding and, when applicable,
potential common shares outstanding during the period. A
reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of basic and
diluted income per share is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Basic income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
5,874
|
|
|
$
|
6,361
|
|
|
$
|
17,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted common shares outstanding
|
|
|
9,860
|
|
|
|
9,842
|
|
|
|
10,073
|
|
Share equivalent units (SEUs) outstanding
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares and SEUs outstanding
|
|
|
9,919
|
|
|
|
9,899
|
|
|
|
10,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income per share
|
|
$
|
.59
|
|
|
$
|
.64
|
|
|
$
|
1.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
5,874
|
|
|
$
|
6,361
|
|
|
$
|
17,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares and SEUs outstanding
|
|
|
9,919
|
|
|
|
9,899
|
|
|
|
10,134
|
|
Stock options outstanding
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Contingently issuable SEUs
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common and potential common shares outstanding
|
|
|
9,958
|
|
|
|
9,937
|
|
|
|
10,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income per share
|
|
$
|
.59
|
|
|
$
|
.64
|
|
|
$
|
1.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were 17, 17 and 27 options to purchase shares of common
stock at various exercise prices in fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and
fiscal 2009, respectively, which were not included in the
computation of diluted income per share as the effect would be
anti-dilutive.
Cash flow
statement
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an
original maturity of three months or less at the time of
purchase to be cash equivalents.
38
Interest paid was $5 in fiscal 2011, $4 in fiscal 2010, and $5
in fiscal 2009. In addition, income taxes paid were $2,051 in
fiscal 2011, $3,661 in fiscal 2010, and $4,145 in fiscal 2009.
In fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010, and fiscal 2009, non-cash
activities included pension and other postretirement benefit
adjustments, net of income tax, of $707, $2,072 and $4,244,
respectively. Also, in fiscal 2011, non-cash activities included
the issuance of treasury stock valued at $163 to the Employee
Stock Purchase Plan. (See Note 11).
At March 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, there were $9, $117, and
$58, respectively, of capital purchases that were recorded in
accounts payable and are not included in the caption
Purchase of property, plant and equipment in the
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. In fiscal 2011, fiscal
2010 and fiscal 2009, capital expenditures totaling $23, $190
and $31, respectively, were financed through the issuance of
capital leases.
Non-cash activities during fiscal 2009 included a
reclassification from Capital in excess of par value
to Common stock for $506, which represents the par
value of the additional shares issued to effect the
two-for-one
stock split effected in the form of a stock dividend.
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
Comprehensive income is comprised of net income and other
comprehensive income or loss items, which are accumulated as a
separate component of stockholders equity. For the
Company, other comprehensive income or loss items include a
foreign currency translation adjustment and pension and other
postretirement benefit adjustments.
Fair
value measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e. the
exit price) in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date. The accounting standards
for fair values establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in
measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs
and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that
the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable
inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing
the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained
from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are
inputs that reflect the Companys assumptions about the
assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset
or liability developed based on the best information available
in the circumstances. The hierarchy is broken down into three
levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:
Level 1 Valuations based on quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
that the Company has the ability to access. Since valuations are
based on quoted prices that are readily and regularly available
in an active market, valuation of these products does not entail
a significant degree of judgment.
Level 2 Valuation is determined from
quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active
markets, quoted prices for identical instruments in markets that
are not active or by model-based techniques in which all
significant inputs are observable in the market.
Level 3 Valuations based on inputs that
are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value
measurement. The degree of judgment exercised in determining
fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in
Level 3.
The availability of observable inputs can vary and is affected
by a wide variety of factors, including, the type of
asset/liability, whether the asset/liability is established in
the marketplace, and other characteristics particular to the
transaction. To the extent that valuation is based on models or
inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market,
the determination of fair value requires more judgment. In
certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall
into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such
cases, for disclosure purposes the level in the fair value
hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its
entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input
that is significant to the fair value measurement in its
entirety.
39
Fair value is a market-based measure considered from the
perspective of a market participant rather than an
entity-specific measure. Therefore, even when market assumptions
are not readily available, assumptions are required to reflect
those that market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability at the measurement date.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the
U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and reported amounts of sales and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ materially from those estimates.
Accounting
and reporting changes
In the normal course of business, management evaluates all new
accounting pronouncements issued by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the
Emerging Issues Task Force, the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants or any other authoritative accounting body to
determine the potential impact they may have on the
Companys consolidated financial statements. Based upon
this review, management does not expect any of the recently
issued accounting pronouncements, which have not already been
adopted, to have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year financial
information to conform to the current year presentation.
Previously, in the March 31, 2010 Consolidated Statement of
Operations, amortization was included in the line item
Selling, general and administrative expenses.
Amortization has been segregated and reported separately in the
line item Amortization. Previously, in the
March 31, 2010 Consolidated Balance Sheet, the line items
Deferred income tax asset and Prepaid expenses
and other current assets were reported on one line item,
Prepaid expenses and other current assets. This line
item has been separated into two line items. Previously, in the
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for fiscal 2010 and fiscal
2009, depreciation and amortization was reported on one line
item, Depreciation and amortization. This line has
been separated into two line items, Depreciation and
Amortization.
On December 14, 2010, the Company completed its acquisition
of Energy Steel & Supply Co. (Energy
Steel), a privately-owned code fabrication and specialty
machining company located in Lapeer, Michigan dedicated
primarily to the nuclear power industry. The Company believes
that this acquisition furthers its growth strategy through
market and product diversification, broadens its offerings to
the energy markets and strengthens its presence in the nuclear
sector.
This transaction was accounted for under the acquisition method
of accounting. Accordingly, the results of Energy Steel were
included in the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements
from the date of acquisition. The purchase price was $17,899 in
cash. Acquisition-related costs of $676 were expensed in the
third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2011 and are included in
selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated
Statement of Operations. The purchase agreement also includes a
contingent earn-out, which ranges from $0 to $2,000, dependent
upon Energy Steels earnings performance in calendar years
2011 and 2012. If achieved, the earn-out will be payable in
fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2012 and is treated as additional
purchase price. A liability of $1,498 was recorded for the
contingent earn-out. In addition, the Company and Energy Steel
entered into a five year lease agreement with ESSC Investments,
LLC for Energy Steels manufacturing and office facilities
located in Lapeer, Michigan which includes an option to renew
the lease for an additional five year term. The Company and
Energy Steel also have an option to purchase the leased facility
for $2,500 at any time during the first two years of the lease
term. ESSC Investments, LLC is partly owned by the President and
former sole shareholder of Energy Steel.
The cost of the acquisition was preliminarily allocated to the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their
estimated fair values at the date of the acquisition and the
amount exceeding the fair value of $7,404 was
40
recorded as goodwill, which is not deductible for tax purposes.
As the values of certain assets and liabilities are preliminary
in nature, they are subject to adjustment as additional
information is obtained, including, but not limited to,
settlement of the contingent payment and the final
reconciliation and confirmation of tangible assets. The
valuations will be finalized within twelve months of the close
of the acquisition. Any changes to the preliminary valuation may
result in material adjustments to the fair value of the assets
and liabilities acquired, as well as goodwill.
The following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the
cost of the acquisition to the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed as of the close of the acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 14,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
2,827
|
|
Property, plant & equipment
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
Backlog
|
|
|
170
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
Tradename
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
Permits
|
|
|
10,300
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
7,404
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
27,210
|
|
Liabilities assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
1,899
|
|
Deferred income tax liability
|
|
|
5,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
7,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price
|
|
$
|
19,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed
were preliminarily determined using one of three valuation
approaches: (i) market; (ii) income; and
(iii) cost. The selection of a particular method for a
given asset depended on the reliability of available data and
the nature of the asset, among other considerations. The market
approach, which estimates the value for a subject asset based on
available market pricing for comparable assets, was utilized for
work in process inventory. The income approach, which estimates
the value for a subject asset based on the present value of cash
flows projected to be generated by the asset, was used for
certain intangible assets such as permits, tradename and
backlog. The projected cash flows were discounted at a required
rate of return that reflects the relative risk of the Energy
Steel transaction and the time value of money. The projected
cash flows for each asset considered multiple factors, including
current revenue from existing customers, the competition
limiting effect of nuclear permits due to the time and effort
required to obtain them, and expected profit margins giving
consideration to historical and expected margins. The cost
approach was used for the majority of personal property, raw
materials inventory and customer relationships. The cost to
replace a given asset reflects the estimated replacement cost
for the asset, less an allowance for loss in value due to
depreciation or obsolescence, with specific consideration given
to economic obsolescence if indicated.
The fair value of the work in process inventory acquired was
estimated by applying a version of the market approach called
the comparable sales method. This approach estimates the fair
value of the asset by calculating the potential sales generated
from selling the inventory and subtracting from it the costs
related to the sale of that inventory and a reasonable profit
allowance. Based upon this methodology, the Company recorded the
inventory acquired at fair value resulting in an increase in
inventory of $196. During the third and fourth quarters of
fiscal 2011, the Company expensed as cost of sales the
step-up
value relating to the acquired inventory sold during fiscal
2011. As of March 31, 2011, there was $49 of inventory
step-up
value remaining in inventory to be expensed. Raw materials
inventory was valued at replacement cost.
41
The purchase price was allocated to specific intangible assets
on a preliminary basis as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Assigned
|
|
|
Amortization Period
|
|
Intangibles subject to amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
|
|
6 months
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
|
|
15 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,870
|
|
|
|
14 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangibles not subject to amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Permits
|
|
$
|
10,300
|
|
|
|
indefinite
|
|
Tradename
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
indefinite
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets are amortized on a straight line basis over
their estimated useful lives. Intangible amortization expense
was $152 in fiscal 2011. Annual intangible amortization expense
is estimated to be $206 in fiscal 2012 and $135 in each of
fiscal years 2013 through 2016.
Backlog consists of firm purchase orders received from customers
that had not yet entered production or were in production at the
date of the acquisition. The fair value of backlog was computed
as the present value of the expected sales attributable to
backlog less the remaining costs to fulfill the backlog. The
life was based upon the period of time in which the backlog is
expected to be converted to sales.
Customer relationships represent the estimated fair value of
customer relationships Energy Steel has with nuclear power
plants as of the acquisition date. These relationships were
valued using the replacement cost method based upon the cost to
obtain and retain the limited number of customers in the nuclear
power market. The Company determined that the estimated useful
life of the intangible assets associated with the existing
customer relationships is 15 years. This life was based
upon historical customer attrition and managements
understanding of the industry and regulatory environment.
Nuclear permits are required and critical to generate all of the
revenue of Energy Steel, due to the strict regulatory
environment of the nuclear industry. The permits are inherently
valuable as a result of their competition-limiting effect due to
the significant time, effort and resources required to obtain
them. The Company intends to continually renew the permits and
maintain all quality programs and processes, as well as abide by
all required regulations of the nuclear industry, therefore, an
indefinite life has been assigned to the permits. The permits
will be tested annually for impairment.
The tradename represents the estimated fair value of the
corporate name acquired from Energy Steel which will be utilized
by the Company in the future. The tradename is inherently
valuable as the Company believes the use of the tradename will
be instrumental in enabling the Company to maintain or expand
its market share. The Company currently intends to utilize the
tradename for an indefinite period of time, therefore, the
intangible asset is not being amortized but will be tested for
impairment on an annual basis.
The excess of the purchase price over the preliminary fair value
of net tangible and intangible assets acquired of $7,404 was
allocated to goodwill. Various factors contributed to the
establishment of goodwill, including: the value of Energy
Steels highly trained assembled workforce and management
team and the expected revenue growth over time that is
attributable to increased market penetration.
42
The Consolidated Statement of Operations for fiscal year 2011
includes net sales from Energy Steel of $5,808. The following
unaudited pro forma information presents the consolidated
results of operations of the Company as if the Energy Steel
acquisition had occurred at the beginning of each of the fiscal
periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Sales
|
|
$
|
83,301
|
|
|
$
|
84,803
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
6,097
|
|
|
|
8,258
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
.61
|
|
|
$
|
.83
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
.61
|
|
|
$
|
.83
|
|
The unaudited pro forma information presents the combined
operation results of Graham Corporation and Energy Steel, with
the results prior to the acquisition date adjusted to include
the pro forma impact of the adjustment of amortization of
acquired intangible assets, depreciation of fixed assets based
on the preliminary purchase price allocation, inventory
step-up
amortization, the adjustment to interest income reflecting the
cash paid in connection with the acquisition, including
acquisition-related expenses, at the Companys weighted
average interest income rate, and the impact of income taxes on
the pro forma adjustments utilizing the applicable statutory tax
rate.
The unaudited pro forma results are presented for illustrative
purposes only. These pro forma results do not purport to be
indicative of the results that would have actually been obtained
if the acquisition occurred as of the beginning of each of the
periods presented, nor does the pro forma data intend to be a
projection of results that may be obtained in the future.
Major classifications of inventories are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Raw materials and supplies
|
|
$
|
2,293
|
|
|
$
|
1,843
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
12,983
|
|
|
|
5,365
|
|
Finished products
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,819
|
|
|
|
7,781
|
|
Less progress payments
|
|
|
7,562
|
|
|
|
1,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,257
|
|
|
$
|
6,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 4
|
Property,
Plant and Equipment:
|
Major classifications of property, plant and equipment are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
Buildings and leasehold improvements
|
|
|
11,030
|
|
|
|
10,713
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
20,994
|
|
|
|
17,972
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,443
|
|
|
|
29,393
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
20,738
|
|
|
|
19,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,705
|
|
|
$
|
9,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense in fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010, and fiscal
2009 was $1,334, $1,107, and $993, respectively.
43
Note 5
Product Warranty Liability:
The reconciliation of the changes in the product warranty
liability is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
369
|
|
|
$
|
366
|
|
Expense for product warranties
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Product warranty claims paid
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
202
|
|
|
$
|
369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The product warranty liability is included in the line item
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities in
the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Note 6
Leases:
The Company leases equipment and office space under various
operating leases. Lease expense applicable to operating leases
was $251, $157 and $183 in fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010, and fiscal
2009, respectively.
Property, plant and equipment include the following amounts for
leases which have been capitalized:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
$
|
311
|
|
|
$
|
288
|
|
Less accumulated amortization
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
$
|
214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of machinery and equipment under capital leases
amounted to $72, $33 and $23 in fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010, and
fiscal 2009, respectively, and is included in depreciation
expense.
As of March 31, 2011, future minimum payments required
under non-cancelable leases are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
452
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
2013
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
2014
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
2015
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
2016
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
1,686
|
|
|
$
|
169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less amount representing interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of net minimum lease payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7
Debt:
Short-Term
Debt Due to Banks
The Company and its subsidiaries had no short-term borrowings
outstanding at March 31, 2011 and 2010.
On December 3, 2010, the Company entered into a new
revolving credit facility agreement that provides a $25,000 line
of credit, including letters of credit and bank guarantees,
expandable at the Companys option at any time up to a
total of $50,000. There are no sublimits in the agreement with
regard to borrowings, issuance of letters of credit or issuance
of bank guarantees for the Companys Chinese subsidiary.
The agreement has a three year term, with two automatic one year
extensions.
44
At the Companys option, amounts outstanding under the
agreement will bear interest at either: (i) a rate equal to
the banks prime rate; or (ii) a rate equal to LIBOR
plus a margin. The margin is based upon the Companys
funded debt to earnings before interest expense, income taxes,
depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) and may range
from 2.00% to 1.00%. Amounts available for borrowing under the
agreement are subject to an unused commitment fee of between
0.375% and 0.200%, depending on the above ratio. The banks
prime rate was 3.25% at March 31, 2011 and 2010.
Outstanding letters of credit under the agreement are subject to
a fee of between 1.25% and .75%, depending on the Companys
ratio of funded debt to EBITDA. The agreement allows the Company
to reduce the fee on outstanding letters of credit to a fixed
rate of .55% by securing outstanding letters of credit with cash
and cash equivalents. At March 31, 2011, outstanding
letters of credit were secured by cash and cash equivalents.
Availability under the line of credit was $11,249 at
March 31, 2011.
Under the Companys revolving credit facility, the Company
covenants to maintain a maximum funded debt to EBITDA ratio of
3.5 to 1 and a minimum earnings before interest expense and
income taxes to interest ratio of 4.0 to 1. The agreement also
provides that the Company is permitted to pay dividends without
limitation if it maintains a maximum funded debt to EBITDA ratio
equal to or less than 2.0 to 1 and permits the Company to pay
dividends in an amount equal to 25% of net income if it
maintains a maximum funded debt to EBITDA ratio of greater than
2.0 to 1. The Company was in compliance with all such provisions
as of and for the year ended March 31, 2011. Assets with a
book value of $71,787 have been pledged to secure certain
borrowings under the credit facility.
Long-Term
Debt
The Company and its subsidiaries had long-term capital lease
obligations outstanding as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations (Note 6)
|
|
$
|
163
|
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
Less: current amounts
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With the exception of capital leases, there are no long-term
debt payment requirements over the next five years as of
March 31, 2011.
Note 8
Financial Instruments and Derivative Financial
Instruments:
Concentrations
of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to
concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash, cash
equivalents, investments, and trade accounts receivable. The
Company places its cash, cash equivalents, and investments with
high credit quality financial institutions, and evaluates the
credit worthiness of these financial institutions on a regular
basis. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade
accounts receivable are limited due to the large number of
customers comprising the Companys customer base and their
geographic dispersion. At March 31, 2011 and 2010, the
Company had no significant concentrations of credit risk.
Letters
of Credit
The Company has entered into standby letter of credit agreements
with financial institutions relating to the guarantee of future
performance on certain contracts. At March 31, 2011 and
2010, the Company was contingently liable on outstanding standby
letters of credit aggregating $13,751 and $9,584, respectively.
Foreign
Exchange Risk Management
The Company, as a result of its global operating and financial
activities, is exposed to market risks from changes in foreign
exchange rates. In seeking to minimize the risks
and/or costs
associated with such activities, the Company may utilize foreign
exchange forward contracts with fixed dates of maturity and
exchange rates. The
45
Company does not hold or issue financial instruments for trading
or other speculative purposes and only holds contracts with high
quality financial institutions. If the counter-parties to any
such exchange contracts do not fulfill their obligations to
deliver the contracted foreign currencies, the Company could be
at risk for fluctuations, if any, required to settle the
obligation. At March 31, 2011 and 2010, there were no
foreign exchange forward contracts held by the Company.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The estimates of the fair value of financial instruments are
summarized as follows:
Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying
amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value due
to the short-term maturity of these instruments and are
considered Level 1 assets in the fair value hierarchy.
Note 9
Income Taxes:
An analysis of the components of income before income taxes is
presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
8,954
|
|
|
$
|
10,060
|
|
|
$
|
26,831
|
|
China
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,760
|
|
|
$
|
10,061
|
|
|
$
|
26,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes related to income before income
taxes consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
3,677
|
|
|
$
|
8,143
|
|
|
$
|
3,138
|
|
State
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,809
|
|
|
|
8,268
|
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(805
|
)
|
|
|
(4,658
|
)
|
|
|
5,827
|
|
State
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
159
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Changes in valuation allowance
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(923
|
)
|
|
|
(4,568
|
)
|
|
|
6,022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
2,886
|
|
|
$
|
3,700
|
|
|
$
|
9,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
The reconciliation of the provision calculated using the
U.S. federal tax rate with the provision for income taxes
presented in the financial statements is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes at federal rate
|
|
$
|
2,979
|
|
|
$
|
3,421
|
|
|
$
|
9,091
|
|
State taxes
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
239
|
|
Charges not deductible for income tax purposes
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
Recognition of tax benefit generated by qualified production
activities deduction
|
|
|
(222
|
)
|
|
|
(367
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Research and development tax credits
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncertain tax positions
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
2,886
|
|
|
$
|
3,700
|
|
|
$
|
9,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net deferred income tax liability recorded in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets results from differences between
financial statement and tax reporting of income and deductions.
A summary of the composition of the Companys net deferred
income tax liability follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
$
|
(2,004
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,355
|
)
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
Prepaid pension asset
|
|
|
(2,381
|
)
|
|
|
(2,556
|
)
|
Accrued pension liability
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
Compensated absences
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
|
453
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
1,074
|
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
Warranty liability
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
(5,633
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
New York State investment tax credit
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,582
|
)
|
|
|
(2,282
|
)
|
Less: Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(406
|
)
|
|
|
(332
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(6,988
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,614
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net deferred income tax liability is presented in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Current deferred income tax asset
|
|
$
|
1,906
|
|
|
$
|
255
|
|
Long-term deferred income tax asset
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
Current deferred income tax liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
Long-term deferred income tax liability
|
|
|
(8,969
|
)
|
|
|
(2,930
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(6,988
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,614
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
Deferred income taxes include the impact of state investment tax
credits of $252, which expire from 2012 to 2025 and state
investment tax credits of $154 with an unlimited carryforward
period.
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets,
management considers, within each taxing jurisdiction, whether
it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the
deferred tax assets will not be realized. Management considers
the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected
future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this
assessment. Based on the consideration of the weight of both
positive and negative evidence, management has determined that a
portion of the deferred tax assets as of March 31, 2011
related to certain state investment tax credits will not be
realized.
The Company files federal and state income tax returns in
several domestic and international jurisdictions. In most tax
jurisdictions, returns are subject to examination by the
relevant tax authorities for a number of years after the returns
have been filed. The Company is currently under examination by
the United States Internal Revenue Service (the IRS)
for tax years 2009 and 2010. The IRS has completed its
examination for tax years 2006 through 2008. In June 2010, the
IRS proposed an adjustment, plus interest, to disallow
substantially all of the research and development tax credit
claimed by the Company in tax years 2006 through 2008. The
Company filed a protest to appeal the adjustment in July 2010.
The Company believes its tax position is correct and will
continue to take appropriate actions to vigorously defend its
position.
The cumulative tax benefit related to the research and
development tax credit for the tax years ended March 31,
1999 through March 31, 2011 was $2,383. The liability for
unrecognized tax benefits related to this tax position was $477
and $445 at March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which
represents managements estimate of the potential
resolution of this issue. Any additional impact on the
Companys income tax liability cannot be determined at this
time. The tax benefit and liability for unrecognized tax
benefits were recorded in the Companys Consolidated
Statement of Operations as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Tax benefit of research and development tax credit
|
|
$
|
1,653
|
|
|
$
|
218
|
|
|
$
|
238
|
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
$
|
2,383
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(445
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(477
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net tax benefit of research and development tax credit
|
|
$
|
1,653
|
|
|
$
|
218
|
|
|
$
|
238
|
|
|
$
|
(308
|
)
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
1,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company is subject to examination in state and international
tax jurisdictions for tax years 2007 through 2010 and tax years
2008 through 2010, respectively. It is the Companys policy
to recognize any interest related to uncertain tax positions in
interest expense and any penalties related to uncertain tax
positions in selling, general and administrative expense. During
fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, the Company recorded
$87, $32 and $0, respectively, for interest related to its
uncertain tax positions. No penalties related to uncertain tax
positions were recorded in fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal
2009.
The following table summarizes the changes to the unrecognized
tax benefit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
445
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Additions based upon tax positions taken during prior periods
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
Additions based upon tax positions taken during the current
period
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
1,365
|
|
|
$
|
445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With regard to the IRS examination for tax year 2010, a tax
position taken will be disallowed, causing the Companys
uncertain tax positions to increase by $888.
48
Note 10
Employee Benefit Plans:
Retirement
Plans
The Company has a qualified defined benefit plan covering
U.S. employees hired prior to January 1, 2003, which
is non-contributory. Benefits are based on the employees
years of service and average earnings for the five highest
consecutive calendar years of compensation in the ten-year
period preceding retirement. The Companys funding policy
for the plan is to contribute the amount required by the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.
On April 1, 2008, the Company was required to transition to
a fiscal year end measurement date in which it utilized the
remeasurement approach requiring plan assets and benefit
obligations to be remeasured as of the beginning of fiscal 2009.
The measurement date prior to the adoption of the measurement
date provisions was December 31. The pension cost and
changes in the projected benefit obligation and the fair value
of plan assets for fiscal 2009 presented below include the
adjustments to initially remeasure the plan assets and benefit
obligations.
The components of pension cost are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Service cost during the period
|
|
$
|
384
|
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
|
$
|
509
|
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
1,298
|
|
|
|
1,558
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(2,499
|
)
|
|
|
(1,858
|
)
|
|
|
(2,310
|
)
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
|
818
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net pension (benefit) cost
|
|
$
|
(350
|
)
|
|
$
|
577
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average actuarial assumptions used to determine net
pension cost are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.07
|
%
|
|
|
7.39
|
%
|
|
|
6.75
|
%
|
Rate of increase in compensation levels
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
Long-term rate of return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
The expected long-term rate of return is based on the mix of
investments that comprise plan assets and external forecasts of
future long-term investment returns, historical returns,
correlations and market volatilities.
The Company does not expect to make any contributions to the
plan during fiscal 2012.
Changes in the Companys benefit obligation, plan assets
and funded status for the pension plan are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change in the benefit obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
22,498
|
|
|
$
|
17,895
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
1,298
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
2,431
|
|
|
|
3,854
|
|
Benefit payments
|
|
|
(886
|
)
|
|
|
(784
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
$
|
25,688
|
|
|
$
|
22,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
The weighted average actuarial assumptions used to determine the
benefit obligation are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.63
|
%
|
|
|
6.07
|
%
|
Rate of increase in compensation levels
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
Change in fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
29,833
|
|
|
$
|
22,195
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
3,421
|
|
|
|
8,422
|
|
Benefit and administrative expense payments
|
|
|
(886
|
)
|
|
|
(784
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
$
|
32,368
|
|
|
$
|
29,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status at end of year
|
|
$
|
6,680
|
|
|
$
|
7,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
$
|
6,680
|
|
|
$
|
7,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The projected benefit obligation is the actuarial present value
of benefits attributable to employee service rendered to date,
including the effects of estimated future pay increases. The
accumulated benefit obligation also reflects the actuarial
present value of benefits attributable to employee service
rendered to date, but does not include the effects of estimated
future pay increases. The accumulated benefit obligation as of
March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $21,573 and $18,794,
respectively. At March 31, 2011 and 2010, the pension plan
was fully funded on an accumulated benefit obligation basis.
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net
of income tax, consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net actuarial losses
|
|
$
|
5,407
|
|
|
$
|
4,831
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,418
|
|
|
$
|
4,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss (income),
net of income tax, in fiscal 2011 consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss arising during the year
|
|
$
|
847
|
|
Amortization of actuarial loss
|
|
|
(271
|
)
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated net actuarial loss and prior service cost for the
pension plan that will be amortized from accumulated other
comprehensive loss into net pension cost in fiscal 2012 are $517
and $4, respectively.
The following benefit payments, which reflect future service,
are expected to be paid:
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
1,007
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
2014
|
|
|
1,082
|
|
2015
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
2016
|
|
|
1,189
|
|
2017-2021
|
|
|
7,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
12,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
The weighted average asset allocation of the plan assets by
asset category is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
Allocation
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Asset Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
50-70
|
%
|
|
|
68
|
%
|
|
|
66
|
%
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
20-50
|
%
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
Other, including cash
|
|
|
0-10
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The investment strategy of the plan is to generate a consistent
total investment return sufficient to pay present and future
plan benefits to retirees, while minimizing the long-term cost
to the Company. Target allocations for asset categories are used
to earn a reasonable rate of return, provide required liquidity
and minimize the risk of large losses. Targets are adjusted when
considered necessary to reflect trends and developments within
the overall investment environment.
The fair values of the Companys pension plan assets at
March 31, 2011, by asset category, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
Asset Category
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. companies
|
|
|
17,840
|
|
|
|
17,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International companies
|
|
|
4,260
|
|
|
|
4,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bond funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intermediate-term
|
|
|
8,174
|
|
|
|
8,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term
|
|
|
2,019
|
|
|
|
2,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,368
|
|
|
$
|
32,368
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of Level 1 pension assets are obtained by
reference to the last quoted price of the respective security on
the market which it trades. See Note 1 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
On February 4, 2003, the Company closed the defined benefit
plan to all employees hired on or after January 1, 2003. In
place of the defined benefit plan, these employees participate
in the Companys domestic defined contribution plan. The
Company contributes a fixed percentage of employee compensation
to this plan on an annual basis for these employees. The Company
contribution to the defined contribution plan for these
employees in fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009 was $117,
$93 and $111, respectively.
The Company has a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
(SERP) which provides retirement benefits associated
with wages in excess of the legislated qualified plan maximums.
Pension expense recorded in fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010, and fiscal
2009 related to this plan was $15, $16 and $22, respectively. At
March 31, 2011 and 2010, the related liability was $260 and
$272, respectively. The current portion of the related liability
of $26 at March 31, 2011 and 2010 is included in the
caption Accrued Compensation and the long-term
portion is separately presented in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
The Company has a domestic defined contribution plan (401K)
covering substantially all employees. Company contributions to
the plan are determined by a formula based on profitability and
are made at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors. Contributions were $242 in fiscal 2011, $230
in fiscal 2010 and $259 in fiscal 2009.
51
Other
Postretirement Benefits
In addition to providing pension benefits, the Company has a
plan in the U.S. that provides health care benefits for
eligible retirees and eligible survivors of retirees. The
Companys share of the medical premium cost has been capped
at $4 for family coverage and $2 for single coverage for early
retirees, and $1 for both family and single coverage for regular
retirees.
On February 4, 2003, the Company terminated postretirement
health care benefits for its U.S. employees. Benefits
payable to retirees of record on April 1, 2003 remained
unchanged.
On April 1, 2008, the Company was required to transition to
a fiscal year end measurement date in which it utilized the
remeasurement approach requiring plan benefit obligations to be
remeasured as of the beginning of the year. The measurement date
prior to the adoption of the measurement date provisions was
December 31. The postretirement benefit cost (income) and
the changes in the projected benefit obligation and the fair
value of plan assets for fiscal 2009 presented below include the
adjustments to initially remeasure the plan assets and benefit
obligations.
The components of postretirement benefit cost (income) are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Interest cost on accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
Amortization of prior service benefit
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
(208
|
)
|
Amortization of actuarial loss
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net postretirement benefit income
|
|
$
|
(82
|
)
|
|
$
|
(83
|
)
|
|
$
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average discount rate used to develop the net
postretirement benefit cost were 5.15%, 6.88% and 6.19% in
fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively.
Changes in the Companys benefit obligation, plan assets
and funded status for the plan are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change in the benefit obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
989
|
|
|
$
|
950
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
Actuarial gain
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
Benefit payments
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
$
|
999
|
|
|
$
|
989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average actuarial assumptions used to develop the
accrued postretirement benefit obligation were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
4.69
|
%
|
|
|
5.15
|
%
|
Medical care cost trend rate
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
9.00
|
%
|
52
The medical care cost trend rate used in the actuarial
computation ultimately reduces to 5% in 2018 and subsequent
years. This was accomplished using 0.5% decrements for the years
ended March 31, 2012 through 2018.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change in fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Employer contribution
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
Benefit payments
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status at end of year
|
|
$
|
(999
|
)
|
|
$
|
(989
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
$
|
(999
|
)
|
|
$
|
(989
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The current portion of the accrued postretirement benefit
obligation of $107 and $109, at March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively, is included in the caption Accrued
Compensation and the long-term portion is separately
presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss
(income), net of income tax, consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
$
|
283
|
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
|
|
(503
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(106
|
)
|
|
$
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss
net of income tax, in fiscal 2011 consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss arising during the year
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
Amortization of actuarial loss
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated net actuarial loss and prior service cost for the
other postretirement benefit plan that will be amortized from
accumulated other comprehensive loss (income) into net
postretirement benefit income in fiscal 2012 are $36 and $(166),
respectively.
The following benefit payments are expected to be paid during
the fiscal years ending March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
107
|
|
2013
|
|
|
104
|
|
2014
|
|
|
99
|
|
2015
|
|
|
94
|
|
2016
|
|
|
90
|
|
2017-2021
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed medical care cost trend rates could have a significant
effect on the amounts reported for the postretirement benefit
plan. However, due to the caps imposed on the Companys
share of the premium costs, a one percentage point change in
assumed medical care cost trend rates would not have a
significant effect on the total service and interest cost
components or the postretirement benefit obligation.
53
Employee
Stock Ownership Plan
The Company has a noncontributory Employee Stock Ownership Plan
(ESOP) that covers substantially all employees in
the U.S. In 1990, the Company borrowed $2,000 under loan
and pledge agreements. The proceeds of the loans were used to
purchase shares of the Companys common stock. The
purchased shares were pledged as security for the payment of
principal and interest as provided in the loan and pledge
agreements. Funds for servicing the debt payments were provided
from contributions paid by the Company to the ESOP, from
earnings attributable to such contributions, and from cash
dividends paid to the ESOP on shares of the Company stock, which
it owns. At March 31, 2000, the loan had been repaid and
all shares were allocated to participants. There were 302 and
309 shares in the ESOP at March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. There were no Company contributions to the ESOP in
fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 or fiscal 2009. Dividends paid on
allocated shares accumulate for the benefit of the employees who
participate in the ESOP.
|
|
Note 11
|
Stock
Compensation Plans:
|
The Amended and Restated 2000 Graham Corporation Incentive Plan
to Increase Shareholder Value provides for the issuance of up to
1,375 shares of common stock in connection with grants of
incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock
awards and performance awards to officers, key employees and
outside directors; provided, however, that no more than
250 shares of common stock may be used for awards other
than stock options. Stock options may be granted at prices not
less than the fair market value at the date of grant and expire
no later than ten years after the date of grant.
During fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010, 20 and 24, respectively,
stock options with a term of ten years from the date of grant
were awarded. The stock option awards granted in fiscal 2011 and
fiscal 2010 vest
331/3%
per year over a three-year term. However, an individuals
outstanding stock options immediately vest in full upon
retirement. The Company has elected to use the straight-line
method to recognize compensation costs related to such awards.
In fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010, 24 and 15 shares,
respectively, of restricted stock were awarded. The restricted
shares granted to officers in fiscal 2011 vest 100% on the third
anniversary of the grant date subject to the satisfaction of the
performance metrics for the applicable three-year period, and
the restricted shares granted in fiscal 2010 vest 50% on the
second anniversary of the grant date and 50% on the fourth
anniversary of the grant date. The restricted shares granted to
directors in fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 vest 100% on the
anniversary of the grant date. Notwithstanding the preceding
vesting schedules, an employees outstanding restricted
shares immediately vest in full when the employee becomes
eligible for retirement, which is the date on which an employee
reaches age 60 and has been employed on a full-time basis
for ten or more years. The Company recognizes compensation cost
in the period the shares vest.
During fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010, and fiscal 2009, the Company
recognized $431, $436, and $372, respectively, of stock-based
compensation cost related to stock option and restricted stock
awards, and $148, $151 and $131, respectively, of related tax
benefits.
The weighted average fair value of options granted during fiscal
2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009 was $8.12, $8.57 and $15.91,
respectively, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with
the following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Expected life
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
|
4.89 years
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
93.19
|
%
|
|
|
99.04
|
%
|
|
|
63.68
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.20
|
%
|
|
|
1.52
|
%
|
|
|
3.12
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
.51
|
%
|
|
|
.36
|
%
|
|
|
.28
|
%
|
The expected life represents an estimate of the weighted average
period of time that options are expected to remain outstanding
given consideration to vesting schedules and the Companys
historical exercise patterns. Expected volatility is estimated
based on the historical closing prices of the Companys
common stock over the expected life of the options. The risk
free interest rate is estimated based on the U.S. Federal
Reserves historical
54
data for the maturity of nominal treasury instruments that
corresponds to the expected term of the option. Expected
dividend yield is based on historical trends.
The Company received cash proceeds from the exercise of stock
options of $236, $63 and $695 in fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and
fiscal 2009, respectively. In fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and
fiscal 2009, the Company recognized a $115, $40 and $1,696,
respectively, increase in capital in excess of par value for the
income tax benefit realized upon exercise of stock options in
excess of the tax benefit amount recognized pertaining to the
fair value of stock option awards treated as compensation
expense.
The following table summarizes information about the
Companys stock option awards during fiscal 2011, fiscal
2010 and fiscal 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Under
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Average Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding at April 1, 2008
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
$
|
5.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
31.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
8.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
$
|
9.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
15.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2010
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
10.37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
15.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
$
|
6.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2011
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
$
|
11.87
|
|
|
|
6.43 years
|
|
|
$
|
2,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest at March 31, 2011
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
11.75
|
|
|
|
6.38 years
|
|
|
$
|
1,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2011
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
$
|
9.99
|
|
|
|
5.56 years
|
|
|
$
|
1,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding at March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
at March 31,
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
(In Years)
|
|
|
$ 1.50- 2.50
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
1.92
|
|
|
|
2.53
|
|
5.56- 8.01
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
7.15
|
|
|
|
5.74
|
|
10.84-15.25
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
14.67
|
|
|
|
8.25
|
|
30.88-44.50
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
32.41
|
|
|
|
7.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 1.50-44.50
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
$
|
11.87
|
|
|
|
6.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company calculated intrinsic value (the amount by which the
stock price exceeds the exercise price of the option) as of
March 31, 2011. The Companys closing stock price was
$23.94 as of March 31, 2011. The total intrinsic value of
the stock options exercised during fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and
fiscal 2009 was $419, $123 and $4,951, respectively. As of
March 31, 2011, there was $581 of total unrecognized
stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested stock
options and restricted stock. The Company expects to recognize
this expense over a weighted average period of 1.71 years.
The outstanding options expire between June 2011 and May 2020.
Options, stock awards and performance awards available for
future grants were 551 at March 31, 2011.
55
The following table summarizes information about the
Companys restricted stock awards during fiscal 2011,
fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair Value
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
Non-vested at April 1, 2008
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
6.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
30.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
26.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
18.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
15.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
12.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at March 31, 2010
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
16.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
15.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
15.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at March 31, 2011
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
15.77
|
|
|
$
|
275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has a Long-Term Incentive Plan which provides for
awards of share equivalent units for outside directors based
upon the Companys performance. Each unit is equivalent to
one share of the Companys common stock. Share equivalent
units are credited to each outside directors account for
each of the first five full fiscal years of the directors
service when consolidated net income is at least 100% of the
approved budgeted net income for the year. The share equivalent
units are payable in cash or stock upon retirement. Compensation
cost for share equivalent units is recorded based on the higher
of the quoted market price of the Companys stock at the
end of the period up to $3.20 per unit or the stock price at
date of grant. The cost of share equivalent units earned and
charged to pre-tax income under this Plan was $30 in fiscal
2011, $30 in fiscal 2010 and $40 in fiscal 2009. At
March 31, 2011 and 2010, there were 60 and 58 share
equivalent units, respectively, in the Plan and the related
liability recorded was $333 and $292 at March 31, 2011 and
2010, respectively. The expense (income) to mark to market the
share equivalent units was $6, $7 and $(25) in fiscal 2011,
fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively. On March 12,
2009, the Compensation Committee of the Companys Board of
Directors suspended the Long-Term Incentive Plan for Directors
first elected after such date.
On July 29, 2010, the Companys stockholders approved
the Graham Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the
ESPP), which allows eligible employees to purchase
shares of the Companys common stock on the last day of a
six-month offering period at a purchase price equal to the
lesser of 85% of the fair market value of the common stock on
either the first day or the last day of the offering period. A
total of 200,000 shares of common stock may be purchased
under the ESPP. In January 2011, 13 shares were issued from
treasury stock to the ESPP for the four month offering period
ended December 31, 2010. During fiscal 2011, the Company
recognized stock-based compensation cost of $47 related to the
ESPP and $16 of related tax benefits. In fiscal 2011, the
Company recognized a $5 increase in capital in excess of par
value for the income tax benefit realized from disqualifying
dispositions in excess of the tax benefit amount recognized
pertaining to the compensation expense recorded.
Note 12
Segment Information:
The Company has one reporting segment as its operating segments
meet the requirement for aggregation. The Company and its
operating subsidiaries design and manufacture heat transfer and
vacuum equipment for the chemical, petrochemical, refining and
electric power generating markets. In December 2010, the Company
acquired Energy Steel, which supplies components and raw
materials for the nuclear power generating market. Heat transfer
equipment includes surface condensers, Heliflows, water heaters
and various types of heat exchangers. Vacuum equipment includes
steam jet ejector vacuum systems and liquid ring vacuum pumps.
These products are sold individually or combined into package
systems. The Company also services and sells spare parts for its
equipment.
56
Net sales by product line for the following fiscal years are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Heat transfer equipment
|
|
$
|
28,923
|
|
|
$
|
23,170
|
|
|
$
|
35,231
|
|
Vacuum equipment
|
|
|
26,227
|
|
|
|
24,564
|
|
|
|
46,043
|
|
All other
|
|
|
19,085
|
|
|
|
14,455
|
|
|
|
19,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
74,235
|
|
|
$
|
62,189
|
|
|
$
|
101,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The breakdown of net sales by geographic area for the following
fiscal years is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Africa
|
|
$
|
1,677
|
|
|
$
|
2,440
|
|
|
$
|
583
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
16,134
|
|
|
|
20,308
|
|
|
|
13,255
|
|
Australia & New Zealand
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
3,059
|
|
|
|
2,032
|
|
|
|
8,015
|
|
Mexico
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
528
|
|
Middle East
|
|
|
11,857
|
|
|
|
6,390
|
|
|
|
8,373
|
|
South America
|
|
|
6,050
|
|
|
|
1,327
|
|
|
|
4,038
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
33,358
|
|
|
|
27,927
|
|
|
|
63,719
|
|
Western Europe
|
|
|
1,032
|
|
|
|
1,014
|
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
Other
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
74,235
|
|
|
$
|
62,189
|
|
|
$
|
101,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The final destination of products shipped is the basis used to
determine net sales by geographic area. No sales were made to
the terrorist sponsoring nations of Sudan, Iran, Cuba, North
Korea or Syria.
In fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2009, total sales to one customer
amounted to 14% and 11%, respectively, of total net sales for
the year. In fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2009, it was not the same
customer whose sales accounted for 14% and 11% of total sales.
There were no sales to a single customer that amounted to 10% or
more of total consolidated sales in fiscal 2010.
Note 13
Other Expense:
In the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the Companys
workforce was reduced by eliminating several staff positions in
an effort to reduce costs. As a result, a restructuring charge
of $96 was recognized, which included severance and related
employee benefit costs. This charge is included in the caption
Other Expense in the fiscal 2010 Consolidated
Statement of Operations.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, the Companys
workforce was restructured by eliminating certain management,
office and manufacturing positions. As a result, a restructuring
charge of $559 was recognized, which included severance and
related employee benefit costs. This charge is included in the
caption Other Expense in the fiscal 2009
Consolidated Statement of Operations.
57
A reconciliation of the changes in the restructuring reserve,
which is included in the caption Accrued Expenses and
Other Current Liabilities in the Consolidated Balance
Sheet is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
Expense for restructuring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
Amounts paid for restructuring
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(442
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 14
|
Purchase
of Treasury Stock:
|
On May 20, 2010, the Companys Board of Directors
extended the Companys stock repurchase program. Under the
stock repurchase program, up to 1,000 shares of the
Companys common stock are permitted to be repurchased by
the Company from time to time either in the open market or
through privately negotiated transactions. The stock repurchase
program terminates at the earlier of the expiration of the
program on July 29, 2011, when all 1,000 shares have
been repurchased or when the Board of Directors terminates the
program. Cash on hand has been used to fund all stock
repurchases under the program. At March 31, 2011 and 2010,
the Company had purchased 362 shares at a cost of $3,392
and 303 shares at a cost of $2,517, respectively, under
this program.
|
|
Note 15
|
Commitments
and Contingencies:
|
The Company has been named as a defendant in certain lawsuits
alleging personal injury from exposure to asbestos contained in
products made by the Company. The Company is a co-defendant with
numerous other defendants in these lawsuits and intends to
vigorously defend itself against these claims. The claims are
similar to previous asbestos suits that named the Company as
defendant, which either were dismissed when it was shown that
the Company had not supplied products to the plaintiffs
places of work or were settled for amounts below the expected
defense costs. The outcome of these lawsuits cannot be
determined at this time.
From time to time in the ordinary course of business, the
Company is subject to legal proceedings and potential claims. At
March 31, 2011, other than noted above, management was
unaware of any other material litigation matters.
|
|
Note 16
|
Quarterly
Financial Data (Unaudited):
|
A capsule summary of the Companys unaudited quarterly
results for fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
Second
|
|
Third
|
|
Fourth
|
|
Total
|
Year Ended March 31, 2011
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Year
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
13,351
|
|
|
$
|
15,723
|
|
|
$
|
19,215
|
|
|
$
|
25,946
|
|
|
$
|
74,235
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
3,850
|
|
|
|
5,347
|
|
|
|
4,751
|
|
|
|
7,903
|
|
|
|
21,851
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
|
|
2,886
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
1,557
|
|
|
|
759
|
|
|
|
2,680
|
|
|
|
5,874
|
|
Per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
.09
|
|
|
$
|
.16
|
|
|
$
|
.08
|
|
|
$
|
.27
|
|
|
$
|
.59
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
.09
|
|
|
$
|
.16
|
|
|
$
|
.08
|
|
|
$
|
.27
|
|
|
$
|
.59
|
|
Market price range of common stock
|
|
$
|
13.50-19.60
|
|
|
$
|
13.52-17.99
|
|
|
$
|
14.75-21.00
|
|
|
$
|
19.08-24.58
|
|
|
$
|
13.50-24.58
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
Second
|
|
Third
|
|
Fourth
|
|
Total
|
Year Ended March 31, 2010
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Year
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
20,138
|
|
|
$
|
16,108
|
|
|
$
|
12,166
|
|
|
$
|
13,777
|
|
|
$
|
62,189
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
8,278
|
|
|
|
5,854
|
|
|
|
3,821
|
|
|
|
4,278
|
|
|
|
22,231
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
1,529
|
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
3,700
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
3,518
|
|
|
|
1,468
|
|
|
|
764
|
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
6,361
|
|
Per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
.36
|
|
|
$
|
.15
|
|
|
$
|
.08
|
|
|
$
|
.06
|
|
|
$
|
.64
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
.35
|
|
|
$
|
.15
|
|
|
$
|
.08
|
|
|
$
|
.06
|
|
|
$
|
.64
|
|
Market price range of common stock
|
|
$
|
8.70-16.12
|
|
|
$
|
10.52-15.67
|
|
|
$
|
13.37-21.84
|
|
|
$
|
14.63-21.58
|
|
|
$
|
8.70-21.84
|
|
59
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Graham Corporation
Batavia, New York
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Graham Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as
of March 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in stockholders equity,
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
March 31, 2011. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Graham Corporation and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2011
and 2010, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended
March 31, 2011, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
March 31, 2011, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission and our report dated June 3, 2011 expressed an
unqualified opinion on the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Rochester, New York
June 3, 2011
60
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Graham Corporation
Batavia, New York
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of
Graham Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as
of March 31, 2011, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. As described in Managements Annual Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under
Item 9A of its Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31, 2011, management excluded from
its assessment the internal control over financial reporting at
Energy Steel and Supply Company (Energy Steel),
which was acquired on December 14, 2010 and whose financial
statements constitute 28% and 25% of net and total assets,
respectively, 8% of net sales, and 14% of net income of the
consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year
ended March 31, 2011. Accordingly, our audit did not
include the internal control over financial reporting at Energy
Steel. The Companys management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A of its Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31, 2011. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
companys principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
by the companys board of directors, management, and other
personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting
to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of March 31, 2011, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial
statement schedule as of and for the year ended March 31,
2011 of the Company and our reports dated June 3, 2011
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
statements and consolidated financial statement schedule.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Rochester, New York
June 3, 2011
61
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Conclusion
Regarding Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer) and Vice
President-Finance & Administration and Chief Financial
Officer (principal financial officer), has evaluated the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Based upon, and as of the date of that evaluation, our President
and Chief Executive Officer and Vice
President-Finance & Administration and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures
were effective, in all material respects, to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and
submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act), is (i) recorded, processed,
summarized and reported as and when required and (ii) is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
President and Chief Executive Officer and Vice
President-Finance & Administration and Chief Financial
Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Other than the events discussed under the section entitled
Energy Steel Acquisition below, there has been no change to our
internal control over financial reporting during the fourth
quarter of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
that has materially affected, or that is reasonably likely to
materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
Energy
Steel Acquisition
On December 14, 2010, we acquired Energy Steel, a code
fabrication and specialty machining company dedicated
exclusively to the nuclear power industry and located in Lapeer,
Michigan. For additional information regarding the acquisition,
refer to Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
included in Item 8 in this Annual Report on
10-K and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations included in Item 7 in this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
As permitted by SEC guidance, we have excluded the Energy Steel
acquisition from the scope of our managements Annual
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting for the
fiscal year ending March 31, 2011. We are in the process of
implementing our internal control structure over the Energy
Steel acquisition and we expect that this effort will be
completed during the fiscal year ending March 31, 2012.
Managements
Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term
is defined in Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(f).
A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can
provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the
objectives of the control system are met. Because of the
inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of
controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues
and instances of fraud, if any, within our organization have
been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities
that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that
breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.
Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual
acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by
management override. The design of any system of controls is
also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood
of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design
will succeed in achieving our stated goals under all potential
future conditions. Moreover, over time controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Because of the inherent limitations in the design of an internal
control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur
and not be detected. However, these inherent limitations are
known
62
features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is
possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though
not eliminate, this risk.
Under the supervision and with the participation of management,
including our President and Chief Executive Officer (principal
executive officer) and Vice President
Finance & Administration and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer), we conducted an assessment of the
effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting
based on the framework in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission, exclusive of Energy
Steel as noted above, whose financial statements constitute 25%
of total assets, 8% of net sales and 14% of net income of the
consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year
ended March 31, 2011. Based on the assessment under this
framework, management concluded that our internal control over
financial reporting, excluding Energy Steel, was effective as of
March 31, 2011.
Deloitte & Touche LLP, the independent registered
public accounting firm that audited the financial statements
included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
has issued an attestation report on our internal control over
financial reporting.
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
Except as otherwise stated specifically in this response to
Item 10, the information required by this Item 10 is
incorporated herein by reference from the statements under the
headings Election of Directors, Executive
Officers, Corporate Governance and
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance contained in our proxy statement for our 2011
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed within 120 days
after the year ended March 31, 2011.
Code of Ethics. We have adopted a Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to our principal
executive officer, principal financial officer, controller and
others performing similar functions. Our Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics also applies to all of our other employees
and to our directors. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is
available on our website located at www.graham-mfg.com under the
heading Corporate Governance. We intend to satisfy
any disclosure requirements pursuant to Item 5.05 of
Form 8-K
regarding any amendment to, or a waiver from, certain provisions
of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by posting such
information on our website.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
The information required by this Item 11 is incorporated
herein by reference from the statements under the heading
Compensation of Named Executive Officers and
Directors contained in our proxy statement for our 2011
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed within 120 days
after the year ended March 31, 2011.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
Except as set forth below, the information required by this
Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference from the
statements under the headings Security Ownership of
Certain Beneficial Owners and Security Ownership of
Management contained in our proxy statement for our 2011
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed within 120 days
after the year ended March 31, 2011.
63
Securities
Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans as of
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plan Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining available
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for future issuance
|
|
|
|
Number of securities to
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
under equity
|
|
|
|
be issued upon exercise
|
|
|
exercise price of
|
|
|
compensation plans
|
|
|
|
of outstanding options,
|
|
|
outstanding options,
|
|
|
(excluding securities
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
warrants and rights
|
|
|
warrants and rights
|
|
|
reflected in column (a))
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
$
|
11.87
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
$
|
11.87
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
The information required by this Item 13 is incorporated
herein by reference from the statements under the headings
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and
Corporate Governance contained in our proxy
statement for our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be
filed within 120 days after the year ended March 31,
2011.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accounting Fees and Services
|
The information required by this Item 14 is incorporated
herein by reference from the statements under the heading
Ratification of the Selection of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm contained in our proxy statement
for our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed within
120 days after the year ended March 31, 2011.
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
We have filed our Consolidated Financial Statements in
Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and have listed such financial statements in the Index to
Financial Statements included in Item 8. In addition, the
financial statement schedule entitled
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying
Accounts is filed as part of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
under this Item 15.
All other schedules have been omitted since the required
information is not present or is not present in amounts
sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the
information required is included in the Consolidated Financial
Statements and notes thereto.
The exhibits filed as part of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
are listed in the Index to Exhibits following the signature page
of this
Form 10-K.
64
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Graham Corporation
Batavia, New York
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Graham
Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of
March 31, 2011 and 2010, and for each of the three years in
the period ended March 31, 2011, and the Companys
internal control over financial reporting as of March 31,
2011, and have issued our reports thereon dated June 3,
2011; such consolidated financial statements and reports are
included elsewhere in this
Form 10-K.
Our audits also included the consolidated financial statement
schedule of the Company listed in Item 15. This
consolidated financial statement schedule is the responsibility
of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such
consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as
a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the
information set forth therein.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Rochester, New York
June 3, 2011
65
GRAHAM
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(In
Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
Charged to
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
Costs and
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
End of
|
Description
|
|
of Period
|
|
Expenses
|
|
Accounts
|
|
Deductions
|
|
Period
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves deducted from the asset to which they apply:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for doubtful accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
Reserves included in the balance sheet caption accrued
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product warranty liability
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
202
|
|
Restructuring reserve
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves deducted from the asset to which they apply:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for doubtful accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
Reserves included in the balance sheet caption accrued
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product warranty liability
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
369
|
|
Restructuring reserve
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(442
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves deducted from the asset to which they apply:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for doubtful accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(40
|
)
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
Reserves included in the balance sheet caption accrued
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product warranty liability
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(279
|
)
|
|
|
366
|
|
Restructuring reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
349
|
|
66
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Plan of acquisition, reorganization, arrangement, liquidation or
succession
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable.
|
(3)
|
|
Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws
|
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Graham Corporation, as amended,
is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-laws of Graham Corporation are
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.2 to the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated October 28, 2010.
|
(4)
|
|
Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including
indentures
|
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Not applicable.
|
(9)
|
|
Voting trust agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable.
|
(10)
|
|
Material Contracts
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.1
|
|
Long-Term Stock Ownership Plan of Graham Corporation is
incorporated herein by reference from Appendix A to the
Companys Proxy Statement for its 2000 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on June 30, 2000 (SEC File
No. 001-08462).
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.2
|
|
Graham Corporation Outside Directors Long-Term Incentive
Plan is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1
to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated March 3, 2005.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.3
|
|
Graham Corporation Policy Statement for U.S. Foreign Service
Employees is incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 99.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated March 27, 2006.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.4
|
|
Employment Agreement between Graham Corporation and James R.
Lines executed July 27, 2006 with an effective date of
August 1, 2006, is incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 99.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated July 27, 2006.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.5
|
|
Amended and Restated 2000 Graham Corporation Incentive Plan to
Increase Shareholder Value is incorporated herein by reference
from Appendix A to the Companys Proxy Statement for
its 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 23, 2006.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.6
|
|
Employment Agreement between Graham Corporation and Alan E.
Smith executed August 1, 2007 with an effective date of
July 30, 2007 is incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 10.19 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.7
|
|
Form of Director Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement is
incorporated herein by reference from the Companys
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.8
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of December 31,
2008 by and between Graham Corporation and James R. Lines, is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 99.1 to the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.9
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of December 31,
2008 by and between Graham Corporation and Alan E. Smith, is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 99.2 to the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.10
|
|
Graham Corporation Annual Stock-Based Incentive Award Plan for
Senior Executives is incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 10.27 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31, 2009.
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.11
|
|
Graham Corporation Annual Executive Cash Bonus Program is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.28 to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.12
|
|
Form of Director Restricted Stock Agreement is incorporated
herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.13
|
|
Form of Employee Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.14
|
|
Form of Employee Restricted Stock Agreement is incorporated
herein by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.15
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between Graham Corporation and
each of its Directors and Officers is incorporated herein by
reference from Exhibit 99.2 to the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated January 29, 2010.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.16
|
|
Form of Employee Performance-Vested Restricted Stock Agreement
is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to
the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.17
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Graham
Corporation and Jeffrey F. Glajch executed and effective on
July 29, 2010 is incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Policy Statement on Stockholder Rights Plans is incorporated
herein by reference from Exhibit 99.1 to the Companys
Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated September 9, 2010.
|
|
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement dated December 14, 2010 by and
among Graham Corporation, ES Acquisition Corp., Energy
Steel & Supply Co. and Lisa D. Rice, individually, and
as Trustee of the Lisa D. Rice Revocable Trust dated
June 5, 2003, is incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Earn Out Agreement dated December 14, 2010 by and between
Energy Steel Acquisition Corp., Graham Corporation and Lisa D.
Rice, individually, and as Trustee of the Lisa D. Rice Revocable
Trust dated June 5, 2003, is incorporated herein by
reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Quarterly
Report on From
10-Q for the
quarterly period ended December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Escrow Agreement dated December 14, 2010 by and among PNC
Bank, National Association, ES Acquisition Corp. and Lisa D.
Rice, individually, and as Trustee of the Lisa D. Rice Revocable
Trust dated June 5, 2003, is incorporated herein by
reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Lease Agreement by and between ESSC Investments, LLC, Energy
Steel & Supply Co., and Graham Corporation dated
December 14, 2010, is incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 10.4 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Loan Agreement between the Company and Bank of America, N.A.,
dated December 3, 2010, is incorporated herein by reference
from Exhibit 99.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 3, 2010.
|
|
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Trademark Security Agreement Amendment 1 between the Company and
Bank of America, N.A., dated December 3, 2010, is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 99.2 to the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 3, 2010.
|
(11)
|
|
Statement re computation of per share earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computation of per share earnings is included in Note 1 of
the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12)
|
|
Statement re computation of ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable.
|
(13)
|
|
Annual report to security holders,
Form 10-Q
or quarterly report to security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable.
|
(14)
|
|
Code of Ethics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable.
|
(16)
|
|
Letter re change in certifying accountant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable.
|
(18)
|
|
Letter re change in accounting principles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable.
|
(21)
|
|
Subsidiaries of the registrant
|
|
|
|
*21
|
.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the registrant
|
(22)
|
|
Published report regarding matters submitted to vote of security
holders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable.
|
(23)
|
|
Consents of Experts and Counsel
|
|
|
|
*23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
|
(24)
|
|
Power of Attorney
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable.
|
(31)
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certifications
|
|
|
|
*31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
*31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer
|
(32)
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications
|
|
|
|
*32
|
.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications
|
(99)
|
|
Additional Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Exhibits filed with this report. |
|
# |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan. |
69
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this annual report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
GRAHAM CORPORATION
|
|
|
June 3, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ Jeffrey
Glajch
Jeffrey
Glajch
Vice President-Finance & Administration and
Chief Financial Officer
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James
R. Lines
James
R. Lines
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
June 3, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jeffrey
Glajch
Jeffrey
Glajch
|
|
Vice President-Finance & Administration and Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
June 3, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jennifer
R. Condame
Jennifer
R. Condame
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer and Controller (Principal Accounting
Officer)
|
|
June 3, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Helen
H. Berkeley
Helen
H. Berkeley
|
|
Director
|
|
June 3, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jerald
D. Bidlack
Jerald
D. Bidlack
|
|
Director and Chairman of the Board
|
|
June 3, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Alan
Fortier
Alan
Fortier
|
|
Director
|
|
June 3, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James
J. Malvaso
James
J. Malvaso
|
|
Director
|
|
June 3, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Gerard
T. Mazurkiewicz
Gerard
T. Mazurkiewicz
|
|
Director
|
|
June 3, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Cornelius
S. Van Rees
Cornelius
S. Van Rees
|
|
Director
|
|
June 3, 2011
|
70
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
EXHIBITS
filed with
Form 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
of
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
FOR THE YEAR ENDED
March 31, 2011
GRAHAM CORPORATION