e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
x
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For the quarterly period ended June 28, 2008
|
|
OR
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For the transition period from
to
|
Commission file number 0-15867
CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS,
INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
77-0148231
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
2655 Seely Avenue, Building 5, San Jose, California
|
|
95134
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
(408) 943-1234
Registrants Telephone Number, including Area Code
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant: (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past
90 days. Yes X No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer, and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated filer [ X ]
|
Accelerated
filer [ ]
|
Non-accelerated
filer [ ]
|
Smaller
reporting company [ ]
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes No X
On June 28, 2008, 260,256,338 shares of the
registrants common stock, $0.01 par value, were
outstanding.
CADENCE
DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC.
INDEX
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
CADENCE
DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
836,513
|
|
|
$
|
1,062,920
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
52,751
|
|
|
|
15,193
|
|
Receivables, net of allowances of $3,218 and $2,895, respectively
|
|
|
315,677
|
|
|
|
326,211
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
23,689
|
|
|
|
31,003
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
99,153
|
|
|
|
94,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,327,783
|
|
|
|
1,529,563
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
of $640,382 and $624,680, respectively
|
|
|
359,023
|
|
|
|
339,463
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,314,238
|
|
|
|
1,310,211
|
|
Acquired intangibles, net
|
|
|
112,191
|
|
|
|
127,072
|
|
Installment contract receivables
|
|
|
192,503
|
|
|
|
238,010
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
320,585
|
|
|
|
326,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
3,626,323
|
|
|
$
|
3,871,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible notes
|
|
$
|
230,385
|
|
|
$
|
230,385
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
246,981
|
|
|
|
289,934
|
|
Current portion of deferred revenue
|
|
|
247,758
|
|
|
|
265,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
725,124
|
|
|
|
785,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion of deferred revenue
|
|
|
122,116
|
|
|
|
136,655
|
|
Convertible notes
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
350,422
|
|
|
|
368,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
|
|
972,538
|
|
|
|
1,005,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock and capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
1,530,635
|
|
|
|
1,516,493
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost
|
|
|
(734,608
|
)
|
|
|
(619,125
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
1,104,821
|
|
|
|
1,162,441
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
27,813
|
|
|
|
20,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,928,661
|
|
|
|
2,080,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
$
|
3,626,323
|
|
|
$
|
3,871,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
CADENCE
DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
195,444
|
|
|
$
|
263,793
|
|
|
$
|
351,637
|
|
|
$
|
501,697
|
|
Services
|
|
|
33,694
|
|
|
|
32,816
|
|
|
|
65,890
|
|
|
|
64,738
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
100,340
|
|
|
|
94,352
|
|
|
|
199,140
|
|
|
|
189,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
329,478
|
|
|
|
390,961
|
|
|
|
616,667
|
|
|
|
756,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product
|
|
|
18,018
|
|
|
|
12,827
|
|
|
|
30,019
|
|
|
|
28,479
|
|
Cost of services
|
|
|
27,213
|
|
|
|
23,442
|
|
|
|
52,406
|
|
|
|
47,057
|
|
Cost of maintenance
|
|
|
14,439
|
|
|
|
15,295
|
|
|
|
28,979
|
|
|
|
30,418
|
|
Marketing and sales
|
|
|
89,907
|
|
|
|
98,063
|
|
|
|
182,941
|
|
|
|
200,761
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
120,087
|
|
|
|
122,962
|
|
|
|
245,443
|
|
|
|
240,027
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
34,963
|
|
|
|
41,808
|
|
|
|
72,671
|
|
|
|
82,419
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangibles
|
|
|
5,820
|
|
|
|
4,413
|
|
|
|
11,580
|
|
|
|
8,922
|
|
Restructuring and other charges (credits)
|
|
|
(355
|
)
|
|
|
(1,573
|
)
|
|
|
(355
|
)
|
|
|
(2,518
|
)
|
Write-off of acquired in-process technology
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
310,092
|
|
|
|
317,237
|
|
|
|
624,284
|
|
|
|
635,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
19,386
|
|
|
|
73,724
|
|
|
|
(7,617
|
)
|
|
|
120,581
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2,880
|
)
|
|
|
(3,064
|
)
|
|
|
(5,875
|
)
|
|
|
(6,524
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(1,750
|
)
|
|
|
14,207
|
|
|
|
4,013
|
|
|
|
33,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
14,756
|
|
|
|
84,867
|
|
|
|
(9,479
|
)
|
|
|
147,794
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
9,760
|
|
|
|
25,271
|
|
|
|
4,272
|
|
|
|
43,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
4,996
|
|
|
$
|
59,596
|
|
|
$
|
(13,751
|
)
|
|
$
|
104,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
252,629
|
|
|
|
274,425
|
|
|
|
257,724
|
|
|
|
272,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
269,060
|
|
|
|
302,746
|
|
|
|
257,724
|
|
|
|
297,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
CADENCE
DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
|
|
$
|
1,062,920
|
|
|
$
|
934,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(13,751
|
)
|
|
|
104,017
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
65,553
|
|
|
|
63,308
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
43,044
|
|
|
|
54,709
|
|
Equity in loss from investments, net
|
|
|
718
|
|
|
|
1,720
|
|
(Gain) loss on investments, net
|
|
|
1,729
|
|
|
|
(12,093
|
)
|
Gain on sale and leaseback of land and buildings
|
|
|
(1,070
|
)
|
|
|
(12,071
|
)
|
Write-down of investment securities
|
|
|
8,304
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
Write-off of acquired in-process technology
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
Tax benefit of call options
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
4,292
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
880
|
|
|
|
1,332
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of receivables, net
|
|
|
46,025
|
|
|
|
76,311
|
|
Provisions (recoveries) for losses (gains) on trade accounts
receivable and sales returns
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
Other non-cash items
|
|
|
(1,503
|
)
|
|
|
5,045
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of
acquired businesses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
11,007
|
|
|
|
24,168
|
|
Installment contract receivables
|
|
|
7,298
|
|
|
|
(153,636
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
7,350
|
|
|
|
(972
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
(8,075
|
)
|
|
|
(7,760
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(4,562
|
)
|
|
|
810
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(56,629
|
)
|
|
|
(19,493
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(37,187
|
)
|
|
|
(16,926
|
)
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(12,580
|
)
|
|
|
6,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
57,475
|
|
|
|
120,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of
available-for-sale
investments
|
|
|
3,693
|
|
|
|
3,256
|
|
Purchases of
available-for-sale
investments
|
|
|
(31,758
|
)
|
|
|
----
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of long-term investments
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
|
|
6,241
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
46,500
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(60,769
|
)
|
|
|
(37,996
|
)
|
Purchases of software licenses
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
----
|
|
Investment in venture capital partnerships and equity investments
|
|
|
(1,419
|
)
|
|
|
(1,948
|
)
|
Cash paid in business combinations and asset acquisitions, net
of cash acquired, and acquisition of intangibles
|
|
|
(6,189
|
)
|
|
|
(7,394
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities
|
|
|
(93,567
|
)
|
|
|
8,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on term loan
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
(28,000
|
)
|
Tax benefit from employee stock transactions
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
17,732
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
26,637
|
|
|
|
205,219
|
|
Stock received for payment of employee taxes on vesting of
restricted stock
|
|
|
(3,287
|
)
|
|
|
(10,337
|
)
|
Purchases of treasury stock
|
|
|
(216,236
|
)
|
|
|
(121,455
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities
|
|
|
(192,598
|
)
|
|
|
63,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2,283
|
|
|
|
2,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(226,407
|
)
|
|
|
194,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
|
|
$
|
836,513
|
|
|
$
|
1,128,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
CADENCE
DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
NOTE 1.
|
BASIS OF
PRESENTATION
|
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
have been prepared by Cadence Design Systems, Inc., or Cadence,
without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in
consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or
omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. However, Cadence
believes that the disclosures contained in this Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for a Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
and are adequate to make the information presented not
misleading. These Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
are meant to be, and should be, read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto included
in Cadences Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007.
The unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
included in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
reflect all adjustments (which include only normal, recurring
adjustments and those items discussed in these Notes) that are,
in the opinion of management, necessary to state fairly the
results for the periods presented. The results for such periods
are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for
the full fiscal year.
Preparation of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or
FASB, issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard, or
SFAS, No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which
defines fair value, establishes guidelines for measuring fair
value and expands disclosures regarding fair value measurements.
SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value
measurements but rather eliminates inconsistencies in guidance
found in various prior accounting pronouncements.
SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB issued
FASB Staff Position, or FSP,
FAS No. 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which
delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 157 to fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods
within those fiscal years for all non-financial assets and
non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a
recurring basis (at least annually). Cadence adopted
SFAS No. 157 for fiscal 2008, except as it applies to
those non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities as
described in FSP
FAS No. 157-2,
and it did not have a material impact on its consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows. See
Note 3 for information and related disclosures regarding
Cadences fair value measurements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities. Under SFAS No. 159, companies may
elect to measure certain financial instruments and certain other
items at fair value. The standard requires that unrealized gains
and losses on items for which the fair value option has been
elected be reported in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007. Cadence adopted SFAS No. 159 for fiscal 2008.
However Cadence did not elect to apply the fair value option to
any financial instruments or other items upon adoption of
SFAS No. 159 or during the six months ended
June 28, 2008. Therefore, the adoption of
SFAS No. 159 did not impact Cadences
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
Cadence has determined that Product revenue totaling
$8.4 million recognized during the three months ended
June 28, 2008 should have been recognized during the three
months ended March 29, 2008. As a result, Cadences
net loss for the three months ended March 29, 2008 would
have decreased by $2.8 million, and net income for the
three-months ended June 28, 2008 would have decreased by
$2.8 million. The effect on the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for the three months ended June 28,
2008 and March 29, 2008 is not considered
4
material, and there is no effect to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for the six months ended June 28, 2008.
|
|
NOTE 2.
|
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
Cadence has equity incentive plans that provide for the grant to
employees of stock-based awards, including stock options,
restricted stock awards and restricted stock units. Restricted
stock awards and restricted stock units are referred to as
restricted stock in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
In addition, the 1995 Directors Stock Option Plan, or
1995 Directors Plan, provides for the automatic grant of
stock options to non-employee members of Cadences Board of
Directors. Cadence also has an employee stock purchase plan, or
ESPP, which enables employees to purchase shares of Cadence
common stock.
Stock-based compensation expense and the related income tax
benefit recognized under SFAS No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment in the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations in connection with stock options,
restricted stock and the ESPP for the three and six months ended
June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
$
|
6,708
|
|
|
$
|
9,667
|
|
|
$
|
14,227
|
|
|
$
|
20,097
|
|
Restricted stock and stock bonuses
|
|
|
10,888
|
|
|
|
14,325
|
|
|
|
22,052
|
|
|
|
29,509
|
|
ESPP
|
|
|
3,858
|
|
|
|
3,035
|
|
|
|
6,765
|
|
|
|
5,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
21,454
|
|
|
$
|
27,027
|
|
|
$
|
43,044
|
|
|
$
|
54,709
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
$
|
5,443
|
|
|
$
|
9,002
|
|
|
$
|
11,503
|
|
|
$
|
19,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
Options
The exercise price of each stock option granted under
Cadences employee equity incentive plans is equal to or
greater than the market price of Cadences common stock on
the date of grant. Generally, option grants vest over four
years, expire no later than ten years from the grant date and
are subject to the employees continuing service to
Cadence. The options granted under the 1995 Directors Plan
vest one year from the date of grant. Options assumed in
connection with acquisitions generally have exercise prices that
differ from the fair value of Cadences common stock on the
date of acquisition and such options generally continue to vest
under their original vesting schedules and expire on the
original dates stated in the acquired companys option
agreements. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on
the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted
and the weighted average assumptions used in the model for the
three and six months ended June 28, 2008 and June 30,
2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
38.0%
|
|
|
|
24.0%
|
|
|
|
42.9%
|
|
|
|
23.1%
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.36%
|
|
|
|
4.92%
|
|
|
|
2.76%
|
|
|
|
4.70%
|
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Weighted average fair value of options granted
|
|
$
|
4.04
|
|
|
$
|
6.24
|
|
|
$
|
4.22
|
|
|
$
|
5.09
|
|
The computation of the expected volatility assumption used in
the Black-Scholes pricing model for new grants is based on
implied volatility. When establishing the expected life
assumption, Cadence reviews annual historical employee exercise
behavior with respect to option grants having similar vesting
periods. The risk-free interest rate for the period within the
expected term of the option is based on the yield of United
States Treasury notes in effect at
5
the time of grant. Cadence has not historically paid dividends;
thus the expected dividend yield used in the calculation is zero.
Restricted
Stock and Stock Bonuses
The cost of restricted stock is determined using the fair value
of Cadences common stock on the date of the grant, and
compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period. The
weighted average grant date fair values of restricted stock
granted during the three and six months ended June 28, 2008
and June 30, 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted
|
|
$
|
11.24
|
|
|
$
|
22.00
|
|
|
$
|
11.10
|
|
|
$
|
20.53
|
|
Generally, restricted stock vests over four years and is subject
to the employees continuing service to Cadence. Cadence
issues some of its restricted stock with performance-based
vesting. The terms of these restricted stock grants are
consistent with grants of restricted stock described above, with
the exception that the shares vest not upon the mere passage of
time, but upon the attainment of certain predetermined
performance goals. Cadence estimates the most likely outcome of
such performance goals and recognizes the related stock-based
compensation expense at each period. The amount of stock-based
compensation expense recognized in any one period can vary based
on the attainment or estimated attainment of the various
performance goals. If such performance goals are not met, no
compensation expense is recognized and any previously recognized
compensation expense is reversed. Stock-based compensation
expense related to these performance-based restricted stock
grants for the three and six months ended June 28, 2008 and
June 30, 2007 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense related to performance-based
grants
|
|
$
|
1,915
|
|
|
$
|
1,869
|
|
|
$
|
3,931
|
|
|
$
|
3,633
|
|
Liability-based
Awards
Cadence maintains a performance-based bonus plan under which
payments may be made in Cadences common stock. Each
period, Cadence estimates the most likely outcome of
predetermined performance goals and recognizes any related
stock-based compensation expense. The amount of stock-based
compensation expense recognized in any one period can vary based
on the attainment or estimated attainment of the various
performance goals. If such performance goals are not met, no
compensation expense is recognized and any previously recognized
compensation expense is reversed. The dollar amount earned under
this bonus plan is based on the achievement of the performance
goals, and the number of shares to be issued under the plan is
based on the average stock price for three days preceding the
grant date. Stock issued under the performance-based bonus plan
vests immediately. During the six months ended June 28,
2008, Cadence agreed to make the periods payment of
$2.7 million in cash. Under the terms of this
performance-based bonus plan, future payments are to be made in
stock. Stock-based compensation expense related to these
performance-based bonus plans and the shares issued for the
three and six months ended June 28, 2008 and June 30,
2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense related to performance-based
bonus plan
|
|
$
|
1,402
|
|
|
$
|
2,857
|
|
|
$
|
2,827
|
|
|
$
|
6,789
|
|
Shares issued for performance-based bonus plan
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
6
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
Under the ESPP, substantially all employees may purchase
Cadences common stock at a price equal to 85% of the lower
of the fair market value at the beginning of the applicable
offering period or at the end of each applicable purchase
period, in an amount up to 12% of their annual base earnings
plus bonuses, subject to a limit in any calendar year of $25,000
worth of common stock. The duration of each offering period
under the ESPP is six months. New offerings begin on each
February 1st and
August 1st of
each year and the purchase dates under the ESPP are
January 31st and
July 31st of
each year.
Shares of Cadences common stock issued under the ESPP for
the three and six months ended June 28, 2008 and
June 30, 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Cadence shares issued under the ESPP
|
|
|
2,719
|
|
|
|
1,921
|
|
Cash received from the exercise of purchase rights under the ESPP
|
|
$
|
23,455
|
|
|
$
|
22,581
|
|
Weighted average purchase price per share
|
|
$
|
8.63
|
|
|
$
|
11.76
|
|
Compensation expense is calculated using the fair value of the
employees purchase rights under the Black-Scholes option
pricing model. The weighted average grant date fair value of
purchase rights granted under the ESPP and the weighted average
assumptions used in the model for the three and six months ended
June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
38.0%
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
43.0%
|
|
|
|
23.0%
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.67%
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
2.05%
|
|
|
|
5.16%
|
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
Weighted average fair value of purchase rights granted
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
|
----
|
|
$
|
2.86
|
|
|
$
|
4.49
|
|
The computation of the expected volatility assumption used in
the Black-Scholes pricing model for purchase rights is based on
implied volatility. The expected life assumption is based on the
average exercise date for the purchase periods in each offering
period. The risk-free interest rate for the period within the
expected life of the purchase right is based on the yield of
United States Treasury notes in effect at the time of grant.
Cadence has not historically paid dividends; thus the expected
dividend yield used in the calculation is zero.
|
|
NOTE 3.
|
FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS
|
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
On a quarterly basis, Cadence measures at fair value certain
financial assets and liabilities, including cash equivalents,
available-for-sale
securities, time deposits, trading securities held in
Cadences Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans, or
NQDCs, and foreign exchange contracts. SFAS No. 157
specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether
the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or
unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained
from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect
Cadences market assumptions. These two types of inputs
have created the following fair-value hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted prices for identical
instruments in active markets;
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Quoted prices for similar
instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or
similar instruments in markets that are not active, and
model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and
significant value drivers are observable in active
markets; and
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Valuations derived from
valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or
significant value drivers are unobservable.
|
7
This hierarchy requires Cadence to minimize the use of
unobservable inputs and to use observable market data, if
available, when determining fair value. The fair value of these
financial assets and liabilities was determined using the
following levels of inputs as of June 28, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of June 28, 2008:
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash equivalents Money market mutual funds
|
|
$
|
695,502
|
|
|
$
|
695,502
|
|
|
$
|
----
|
|
|
$
|
----
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
52,483
|
|
|
|
52,408
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
Trading securities held in NQDCs
|
|
|
46,978
|
|
|
|
46,978
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
795,392
|
|
|
$
|
795,156
|
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable
Securities
Cadence considers all of its investments in marketable
securities as
available-for-sale.
Available-for-sale
securities are stated at fair value, with the unrealized gains
and losses presented net of tax and reported as a separate
component of Stockholders equity. Realized gains and
losses are determined using the specific identification method.
Gains are recognized when realized and are recorded in the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as Other income
(expense), net. Losses are recognized as realized or when
Cadence has determined that an
other-than-temporary
decline in fair value has occurred.
It is Cadences policy to review the fair value of these
marketable securities on a regular basis to determine whether
its investments in these companies are
other-than-temporarily
impaired. This evaluation includes, but is not limited to,
reviewing each companys cash position, financing needs,
earnings or revenue outlook, operational performance, management
or ownership changes and competition. If Cadence believes the
carrying value of an investment is in excess of its fair value,
and this difference is
other-than-temporary,
it is Cadences policy to write down the investment to
reduce its carrying value to fair value.
The following tables summarize Cadences
available-for-sale
marketable securities as of June 28, 2008 and
December 29, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
June 28, 2008
|
|
$
|
43,403
|
|
|
$
|
9,881
|
|
|
$
|
(801
|
)
|
|
$
|
52,483
|
|
December 29, 2007
|
|
$
|
14,044
|
|
|
$
|
4,467
|
|
|
$
|
(3,572
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,939
|
|
The following table summarizes the fair value and gross
unrealized losses related to
available-for-sale
securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time
that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized
loss position as of June 28, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Marketable securities
available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
4,502
|
|
|
$
|
(801
|
)
|
During the six months ended June 28, 2008, Cadence
determined that one of its available-for-sale securities was
other-than-temporarily impaired based on the severity and the
duration of the impairment and Cadence wrote down the investment
by $5.4 million. This impairment is included in Other
income (expense), net in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Operations for the six months ended June 28, 2008. Cadence
did not recognize an other-
8
than-temporary impairment of available-for-sale securities
during the three months ended June 28, 2008 or during the
three and six months ended June 30, 2007.
Cost
Method Investments
Investments accounted for by Cadence under the cost method of
accounting are carried at historical cost and Cadence
periodically evaluates the fair value of each investment to
determine if an other-than-temporary decline in value has
occurred. Cadence recorded write-downs due to
other-than-temporary declines in value of non-marketable
securities carried on the cost basis of $2.9 million for
the three and six months ended June 28, 2008 and
$0.6 million for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2007. These write-downs are included in Other
income (expense), net, in the Condensed Consolidated Statement
of Operations.
|
|
NOTE 4.
|
CONVERTIBLE
NOTES
|
1.375% Convertible
Senior Notes Due 2011 and 1.500% Convertible Senior Notes
Due 2013
In December 2006, Cadence issued $250.0 million principal
amount of 1.375% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2011, or the
2011 Notes, and $250.0 million of 1.500% Convertible
Senior Notes Due 2013, or the 2013 Notes, and collectively, the
Convertible Senior Notes, to three initial purchasers in a
private placement pursuant to Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act for resale to qualified institutional buyers
pursuant to SEC Rule 144A. Cadence received net proceeds of
approximately $487.0 million after transaction fees of
approximately $13.0 million, including $12.0 million
of underwriting discounts. A portion of the net proceeds
totaling $228.5 million was used to purchase
$189.6 million principal amount of Cadences Zero
Coupon Zero Yield Senior Convertible Notes Due 2023, or the 2023
Notes.
Holders may convert their Convertible Senior Notes prior to
maturity upon the occurrence of one of the following events:
|
|
|
|
|
The price of Cadences common stock reaches $27.50 during
certain periods of time specified in the Convertible Senior
Notes;
|
|
|
Specified corporate transactions occur; or
|
|
|
The trading price of the Convertible Senior Notes falls below a
certain threshold.
|
On and after November 2, 2011, in the case of the 2011
Notes, and November 1, 2013, in the case of 2013 Notes,
until the close of business on the scheduled trading day
immediately preceding the maturity date, holders may convert
their Convertible Senior Notes at any time, regardless of the
foregoing circumstances. Cadence may not redeem the Convertible
Senior Notes prior to maturity.
The initial conversion rate for the Convertible Senior Notes is
47.2813 shares of Cadence common stock per $1,000 principal
amount of Convertible Senior Notes, equivalent to a conversion
price of approximately $21.15 per share of Cadence common stock.
Upon conversion, a holder will receive the sum of the daily
settlement amounts, calculated on a proportionate basis for each
day, during a specified observation period following the
conversion date. The daily settlement amount during each date of
the observation period consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash up to the principal amount of the note; and
|
|
|
Cadences common stock to the extent that the conversion
value exceeds the amount of cash paid upon conversion of the
Convertible Senior Notes.
|
In addition, if a fundamental change occurs prior to maturity,
the conversion rate will increase by an additional amount of up
to $8.27 per share, for a holder that elects to convert its
Convertible Senior Notes in connection with such fundamental
change, which amount will be paid entirely in cash. A
fundamental change is any transaction or event (whether by means
of an exchange offer, liquidation, tender offer, consolidation,
merger, combination, reclassification, recapitalization or
otherwise) in which more than 50% of Cadences common stock
is exchanged for, converted into, acquired for or constitutes
solely the right to receive, consideration. No fundamental
change will
9
have occurred if at least 90% of the consideration received
consists of shares of common stock, or depositary receipts
representing such shares, that are:
|
|
|
|
|
Listed on, or immediately after the transaction or event will be
listed on, a United States national securities exchange; or
|
|
|
Approved, or immediately after the transaction or event will be
approved, for quotation on a United States system of automated
dissemination of quotations of securities prices similar to the
NASDAQ National Market prior to its designation as a national
securities exchange.
|
As of June 28, 2008, none of the conditions allowing the
holders of the Convertible Senior Notes to convert had been met.
Cadence evaluated the embedded conversion option in accordance
with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities and concluded that the
embedded conversion option contained within the Convertible
Senior Notes should not be accounted for separately because the
conversion option is indexed to Cadences common stock and
is classified as stockholders equity. Furthermore, Cadence
evaluated the terms of the Convertible Senior Notes for a
beneficial conversion feature in accordance with Emerging Issues
Task Force, or EITF,
No. 98-5,
Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial
Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion
Ratios and EITF
No. 00-27,
Application of Issue
98-5 to
Certain Convertible Instruments and concluded there was no
beneficial conversion feature at the commitment date based on
the conversion rate of the Convertible Senior Notes relative to
the commitment date stock price.
Interest on the Convertible Senior Notes began accruing in
December 2006 and is payable semi-annually each
December 15th and June 15th.
Concurrently with the issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes,
Cadence entered into hedge transactions with various parties
whereby Cadence has the option to purchase up to
23.6 million shares of Cadences common stock at a
price of $21.15 per share, subject to adjustment. These options
expire on December 15, 2011, in the case of the 2011 Notes,
and December 15, 2013, in the case of the 2013 Notes, and
must be settled in net shares. The aggregate cost of these hedge
transactions was $119.8 million and has been recorded as a
reduction to Stockholders equity in accordance with EITF
No. 00-19,
Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed
to, and Potentially Settled in, a Companys Own
Stock. The estimated fair value of the hedges acquired in
connection with the issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes was
$29.4 million as of June 28, 2008. Subsequent changes
in the fair value of these hedges will not be recognized as long
as the instruments remain classified as equity.
In separate transactions, Cadence also sold warrants to various
parties for the purchase of up to 23.6 million shares of
Cadences common stock at a price of $31.50 per share in a
private placement pursuant to Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act. The warrants expire on various dates from
February 2012 through April 2012 in the case of the 2011 Notes,
and February 2014 through April 2014 in the case of the 2013
Notes, and must be settled in net shares. Cadence received
$39.4 million in cash proceeds from the sale of these
warrants, which has been recorded as a reduction to
Stockholders equity in accordance with EITF
No. 00-19.
The estimated fair value of the warrants sold in connection with
the issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes was
$12.7 million as of June 28, 2008. Subsequent changes
in the fair value of these warrants will not be recognized as
long as the instruments remain classified as equity. The
warrants will be included in diluted earnings per share, or EPS,
to the extent the impact is considered dilutive.
Zero
Coupon Zero Yield Senior Convertible Notes Due 2023
In August 2003, Cadence issued $420.0 million principal
amount of its 2023 Notes to two initial purchasers in a private
placement pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
for resale to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to SEC
Rule 144A. Cadence received net proceeds of
$406.4 million after transaction fees of $13.6 million
that were recorded in Other long-term assets and are being
amortized to interest expense using the straight-line method
over five years, which is the duration of the first redemption
period. The 2023 Notes were issued by Cadence at par and bear no
interest. The 2023 Notes are convertible into Cadence common
stock initially at a conversion price of $15.65 per share, which
would result in an aggregate of 26.8 million shares issued
upon conversion, subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of
specified events. In connection with the issuance of the
Convertible Senior Notes
10
in December 2006, Cadence repurchased $189.6 million
principal amount of the 2023 Notes, reducing the aggregate
number of shares to be issued upon conversion to
14.7 million.
Cadence may redeem for cash all or any part of the 2023 Notes on
or after August 15, 2008 for 100.00% of the principal
amount, except for the 2023 Notes that the holders require
Cadence to repurchase on the repurchase dates described below.
The holders of the 2023 Notes may require Cadence to repurchase
for cash all or any portion of their 2023 Notes on
August 15, 2008 for 100.25% of the principal amount, on
August 15, 2013 for 100.00% of the principal amount or on
August 15, 2018 for 100.00% of the principal amount, by
providing to the paying agent a written repurchase notice. On
July 16, 2008, Cadence filed a Tender Offer Statement on
Schedule TO with the SEC and made available to the holders
of the 2023 Notes, through the Depository Trust Company,
documents specifying the terms, conditions and procedures for
requiring Cadence to repurchase the 2023 Notes on
August 15, 2008 for 100.25% of the principal amount.
Because the holders of the 2023 Notes can require Cadence to
repurchase for cash all or any portion of the 2023 Notes on
August 15, 2008, the 2023 Notes are classified as a Current
liability in Cadences Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets as of June 28, 2008 and December 29, 2007.
Each $1,000 of principal of the 2023 Notes will initially be
convertible into 63.8790 shares of Cadence common stock,
subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of specified events.
Holders of the 2023 Notes may convert their 2023 Notes prior to
maturity only if:
|
|
|
|
|
The price of Cadence common stock reaches $22.69 during certain
periods of time specified in the 2023 Notes;
|
|
|
Specified corporate transactions occur;
|
|
|
The 2023 Notes have been called for redemption; or
|
|
|
The trading price of the 2023 Notes falls below a certain
threshold.
|
In the event of a fundamental change in Cadences corporate
ownership or structure, the holders may require Cadence to
repurchase all or any portion of their 2023 Notes for 100.00% of
the principal amount. Upon a fundamental change in
Cadences corporate ownership or structure, in certain
circumstances Cadence may choose to pay the repurchase price in
cash, shares of Cadence common stock or a combination of cash
and shares of Cadence common stock. As of June 28, 2008,
none of the conditions allowing the holders of the 2023 Notes to
convert had been met.
Cadence evaluated the embedded conversion option in accordance
with SFAS No. 133 and concluded that the embedded
conversion option contained within the 2023 Notes should not be
accounted for separately because the conversion option is
indexed to Cadences common stock and is classified as
stockholders equity. Furthermore, Cadence evaluated the
terms of the 2023 Notes for a beneficial conversion feature in
accordance with EITF
No. 98-5
and EITF
No. 00-27
and concluded there was no beneficial conversion feature at the
commitment date based on the conversion rate of the 2023 Notes
relative to the commitment date stock price.
In connection with the issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes
in December 2006, a portion of the proceeds were used to
purchase in the open market the 2023 Notes with a principal
balance of $189.6 million and for a total purchase price of
$228.5 million. In connection with this purchase, Cadence
incurred expenses of $40.8 million for the early
extinguishment of debt. The loss on early extinguishment of debt
included the call premium on the purchased 2023 Notes and the
write-off of a portion of the unamortized deferred debt issuance
costs.
Concurrently with the issuance of the 2023 Notes, Cadence
entered into hedge transactions with a financial institution
whereby Cadence originally acquired options to purchase up to
26.8 million shares of Cadence common stock at a price of
$15.65 per share. These options expire on August 15, 2008
and must be settled in net shares. The cost of the hedge
transactions to Cadence was $134.6 million. In connection
with the purchase of a portion of the 2023 Notes in December
2006, Cadence also sold 12.1 million of the hedges that
were originally purchased in connection with the 2023 Notes and
received proceeds of $55.9 million.
In addition, Cadence sold warrants for its common stock to a
financial institution for the purchase of up to
26.8 million shares of Cadence common stock at a price of
$23.08 per share. All of the warrants expired out of the money
on various dates from February 2008 through May 2008 and no
settlement was required. Cadence received $56.4 million in
cash proceeds from the sale of these warrants. In connection
with the purchase of a portion of the
11
2023 Notes in December 2006, Cadence also purchased
12.1 million of the warrants for its common stock that were
originally issued in connection with the 2023 Notes at a cost of
$10.2 million.
The costs incurred in connection with the hedge transaction and
the proceeds from the sale of the warrants are included as a net
reduction in Common stock and capital in excess of par in the
accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
June 28, 2008 and December 29, 2007, in accordance
with the guidance in EITF
No. 00-19.
Additionally, the cost to purchase a portion of the warrants and
the proceeds received from selling a portion of the notes hedges
during December 2006 have also been recorded to stockholders
equity. As of June 28, 2008, the estimated fair value of
the remaining hedges acquired in connection with the issuance of
the 2023 Notes was zero. Subsequent changes in the fair value of
these hedge transactions will not be recognized as long as the
instruments remain classified as equity.
|
|
NOTE 5.
|
GOODWILL
AND ACQUIRED INTANGIBLES
|
Goodwill
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets, Cadence conducts an annual
impairment analysis of goodwill. The most recent analysis was
completed during the third quarter of 2007, at which time
Cadence determined that no indicators of impairment existed. For
purposes of SFAS No. 142, Cadence operates under one
reporting unit. Cadences annual impairment review process
compares the fair value of its reporting unit to its carrying
value, including the goodwill related to the reporting unit. To
determine the reporting units fair value, Cadence utilized
the market valuation approach in the most recent evaluation.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six
months ended June 28, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance as of December 29, 2007
|
|
$
|
1,310,211
|
|
Goodwill resulting from acquisition during the period
|
|
|
3,074
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
961
|
|
Tax benefits allocable to goodwill
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 28, 2008
|
|
$
|
1,314,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired
Intangibles, net
Acquired intangibles with finite lives as of June 28, 2008
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Intangibles, net
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Existing technology and backlog
|
|
$
|
655,467
|
|
|
$
|
(614,579
|
)
|
|
$
|
40,888
|
|
Agreements and relationships
|
|
|
100,812
|
|
|
|
(59,069
|
)
|
|
|
41,743
|
|
Distribution rights
|
|
|
30,100
|
|
|
|
(15,050
|
)
|
|
|
15,050
|
|
Tradenames, trademarks and patents
|
|
|
29,867
|
|
|
|
(15,357
|
)
|
|
|
14,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total acquired intangibles
|
|
$
|
816,246
|
|
|
$
|
(704,055
|
)
|
|
$
|
112,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the six months ended June 28, 2008, Cadence acquired
intangible assets of $8.6 million, including
$0.6 million allocated to acquired in-process technology
related to Cadences acquisition of Chip Estimate
Corporation. The acquired in-process technology was immediately
expensed because technological feasibility had not been
established and no future alternative use existed.
12
Acquired intangibles with finite lives as of December 29,
2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Intangibles, net
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Existing technology and backlog
|
|
$
|
651,427
|
|
|
$
|
(602,161
|
)
|
|
$
|
49,266
|
|
Agreements and relationships
|
|
|
96,585
|
|
|
|
(51,791
|
)
|
|
|
44,794
|
|
Distribution rights
|
|
|
30,100
|
|
|
|
(13,545
|
)
|
|
|
16,555
|
|
Tradenames, trademarks and patents
|
|
|
29,367
|
|
|
|
(12,910
|
)
|
|
|
16,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total acquired intangibles
|
|
$
|
807,479
|
|
|
$
|
(680,407
|
)
|
|
$
|
127,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangibles for the three and six
months ended June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cost of product
|
|
$
|
4,762
|
|
|
$
|
5,225
|
|
|
$
|
9,445
|
|
|
$
|
10,778
|
|
Cost of services
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Cost of maintenance
|
|
|
1,045
|
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
2,090
|
|
|
|
2,444
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangibles
|
|
|
5,820
|
|
|
|
4,413
|
|
|
|
11,580
|
|
|
|
8,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total acquired intangibles
|
|
$
|
11,630
|
|
|
$
|
10,858
|
|
|
$
|
23,121
|
|
|
$
|
22,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of costs from existing technology is included in
Cost of product and Cost of services. Amortization of costs from
acquired maintenance contracts is included in Cost of
maintenance.
Estimated amortization expense for the following fiscal years
and thereafter is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2008 remaining period
|
|
$
|
21,123
|
|
2009
|
|
|
35,176
|
|
2010
|
|
|
22,857
|
|
2011
|
|
|
17,553
|
|
2012
|
|
|
12,063
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
3,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total estimated amortization expense
|
|
$
|
112,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal
Proceedings
From time to time, Cadence is involved in various disputes and
litigation matters that arise in the ordinary course of
business. These include disputes and lawsuits related to
intellectual property, mergers and acquisitions, licensing,
contracts, distribution arrangements and employee relations
matters. At least quarterly, Cadence reviews the status of each
significant matter and assesses its potential financial
exposure. If the potential loss from any claim or legal
proceeding is considered probable and the amount or the range of
loss can be estimated, Cadence accrues a liability for the
estimated loss in accordance with SFAS No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies. Legal proceedings are
subject to uncertainties, and the outcomes are difficult to
predict. Because of such uncertainties, accruals are based only
on the best information available at the time. As additional
information becomes available, Cadence reassesses the potential
liability related to pending claims and litigation matters and
may revise estimates.
13
On May 30, 2007, Ahmed Higazi, a former Cadence employee,
filed suit against Cadence in the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California alleging that Cadence
improperly classified him and a class of other Cadence
information technology employees as exempt from overtime pay.
The suit alleges claims for unpaid overtime under the federal
Fair Labor Standards Act and California law, waiting-time
penalties under the California Labor Code, failure to provide
proper earnings statements under California law, failure to
provide meal periods and rest breaks as required by California
law, unfair business practices under California
Business & Professions Code section 17200, and
unpaid 401(k) Plan contributions in violation of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act. On June 20, 2007, Cadence
answered the plaintiffs complaint, denying its material
allegations and raising a number of affirmative defenses, and on
December 19, 2007, Cadence filed an amended answer. A
period of discovery conducted by both sides then ensued, and was
followed in January 2008 by a private mediation of the case. At
the mediation, the parties were successful in resolving their
respective differences, and entered into a settlement agreement
without contesting the merits of the claims or admitting
liability. On July 7, 2008, the court approved the
settlement agreement and Cadence paid the settlement amount
shortly thereafter. Cadence accrued for this settlement in its
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 28, 2008
and December 29, 2007.
While the outcome of disputes and litigation matters cannot be
predicted with any certainty, management does not believe that
the outcome of any current matters will have a material adverse
effect on Cadences consolidated financial position,
liquidity or results of operations.
Income
Taxes
The Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, and other tax authorities
regularly examine Cadences income tax returns. In July
2006, the IRS completed its field examination of Cadences
federal income tax returns for the tax years 2000 through 2002
and issued a Revenue Agents Report, or RAR, in which the
IRS proposed to assess an aggregate tax deficiency for the
three-year period of approximately $324.0 million. In
November 2006, the IRS revised the proposed aggregate tax
deficiency for the three-year period to be approximately
$318.0 million. The IRS is contesting Cadences
qualification for deferred recognition of certain proceeds
received from restitution and settlement in connection with
litigation during the period. The proposed tax deficiency for
this item is approximately $152.0 million. The remaining
proposed tax deficiency of approximately $166.0 million is
primarily related to proposed adjustments to Cadences
transfer pricing arrangements with its foreign subsidiaries and
to Cadences deductions for foreign trade income. The IRS
took similar positions with respect to Cadences transfer
pricing arrangements in the prior examination period and may
make similar claims against Cadences transfer pricing
arrangements in future examinations. Cadence has filed a timely
protest with the IRS and will seek resolution of the issues
through the Appeals Office of the IRS, or the Appeals Office.
Cadence believes that the proposed IRS adjustments are
inconsistent with applicable tax laws and Cadence is vigorously
challenging these proposed adjustments. The RAR is not a final
Statutory Notice of Deficiency, but the IRS imposes interest on
the proposed deficiencies until the matters are resolved.
Interest is compounded daily at rates that are published and
adjusted quarterly by the IRS and have been between 4% and 10%
since 2001. The IRS is currently examining Cadences
federal income tax returns for the tax years 2003 through 2005.
Other
Contingencies
Cadence provides its customers with a warranty on sales of
hardware products for a
90-day
period. These warranties are accounted for in accordance with
SFAS No. 5. To date, Cadence has not incurred any
significant costs related to warranty obligations.
Cadences product license and services agreements include a
limited indemnification provision for claims from third parties
relating to Cadences intellectual property. Such
indemnification provisions are accounted for in accordance with
SFAS No. 5. The indemnification is generally limited
to the amount paid by the customer. To date, claims under such
indemnification provisions have not been significant.
|
|
NOTE 7.
|
NET
INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
|
Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net
income (loss), the numerator, by the weighted average number of
shares of common stock outstanding, less unvested restricted
stock grants, the denominator,
14
during the period. Diluted net income per share gives effect to
equity instruments considered to be potential common shares, if
dilutive, computed using the treasury stock method of
accounting. In periods in which a net loss is recorded,
potentially dilutive equity instruments would decrease the loss
per share and therefore are not added to the weighted average
shares outstanding.
Cadence accounts for the effect of its 2023 Notes in the diluted
net income per share calculation using the if-converted method
of accounting. Under that method, the 2023 Notes are assumed to
be converted to shares (weighted for the number of days
outstanding in the period) at a conversion price of $15.65, and
amortization of transaction fees, net of taxes, related to the
2023 Notes is added back to net income.
EITF
No. 04-08,
Accounting Issues Related to Certain Features of
Contingently Convertible Debt and the Effect on Diluted Earnings
per Share, requires Cadence to include in diluted earnings
per share the shares of Cadences common stock into which
the 1.375% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2011 and the
1.500% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2013, together, the
Convertible Senior Notes, may be converted. However, since the
Convertible Senior Notes meet the qualification of an Instrument
C under EITF
No. 90-19,
Convertible Bonds with Issuer Option to Settle for Cash
Upon Conversion, and because cash will be paid for the
principal amount of the obligation upon conversion, the only
shares that will be considered for inclusion in diluted net
income per share are those relating to the excess of the
conversion premium over the principal amount, using the
if-converted method of accounting.
The calculations for basic and diluted net income (loss) per
share for the three and six months ended June 28, 2008 and
June 30, 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
4,996
|
|
|
$
|
59,596
|
|
|
$
|
(13,751
|
)
|
|
$
|
104,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
252,629
|
|
|
|
274,425
|
|
|
|
257,724
|
|
|
|
272,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
4,996
|
|
|
$
|
59,596
|
|
|
$
|
(13,751
|
)
|
|
$
|
104,017
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of 2023 Notes transaction fees, net of tax
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) as adjusted
|
|
$
|
5,215
|
|
|
$
|
59,815
|
|
|
$
|
(13,751
|
)
|
|
$
|
104,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common and potential common shares used to
calculate basic net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
252,629
|
|
|
|
274,425
|
|
|
|
257,724
|
|
|
|
272,043
|
|
Convertible Senior Notes
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
1,359
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
2023 Notes
|
|
|
14,721
|
|
|
|
14,721
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
14,721
|
|
Options
|
|
|
826
|
|
|
|
9,634
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
7,970
|
|
Restricted stock and ESPP shares
|
|
|
884
|
|
|
|
2,607
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
2,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common and potential common shares used to
calculate diluted net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
269,060
|
|
|
|
302,746
|
|
|
|
257,724
|
|
|
|
297,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
The following table presents the potential shares of
Cadences common stock outstanding for the three and six
months ended June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007 that were
not included in the computation of diluted net income per share
because the effect of including these shares would have been
anti-dilutive:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Options to purchase shares of common stock (various expiration
dates through 2017)
|
|
|
36,638
|
|
|
|
7,959
|
|
|
|
40,345
|
|
|
|
11,860
|
|
Non-vested shares of restricted stock
|
|
|
2,237
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
6,543
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
Warrants to purchase shares of common stock related to the
Convertible Senior Notes (various expiration dates through 2014)
|
|
|
23,640
|
|
|
|
23,640
|
|
|
|
23,640
|
|
|
|
23,640
|
|
Warrants to purchase shares of common stock related to the 2023
Notes (various expiration dates through May 2008)
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
14,717
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
14,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total potential common shares excluded
|
|
|
62,515
|
|
|
|
46,316
|
|
|
|
70,528
|
|
|
|
50,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 8.
|
STOCK
REPURCHASE PROGRAMS
|
In December 2006, Cadences Board of Directors authorized a
program to repurchase shares of Cadences common stock in
the open market with a value of up to $500.0 million in the
aggregate that was completed during the six months ended
June 28, 2008. In February 2008, Cadences Board of
Directors authorized a new program to repurchase shares of
Cadences common stock in the open market with a value of
up to $500.0 million in the aggregate.
The shares repurchased under Cadences stock repurchase
programs during the three and six months ended June 28,
2008 and June 30, 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Shares repurchased
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
19,774
|
|
|
|
5,900
|
|
Total cost of repurchased shares
|
|
$
|
----
|
|
|
$
|
----
|
|
|
$
|
216,236
|
|
|
$
|
121,455
|
|
As of June 28, 2008, the repurchase authorization remaining
under Cadences repurchase program totaled
$412.1 million.
|
|
NOTE 9.
|
RETAINED
EARNINGS
|
The changes in retained earnings for the three and six months
ended June 28, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance as of March 29, 2008
|
|
$
|
1,119,176
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
4,996
|
|
Re-issuance of treasury stock
|
|
|
(19,351
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 28, 2008
|
|
$
|
1,104,821
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance as of December 29, 2007
|
|
$
|
1,162,441
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(13,751
|
)
|
Re-issuance of treasury stock
|
|
|
(43,869
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 28, 2008
|
|
$
|
1,104,821
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cadence records a gain or loss on re-issuance of treasury stock
based on the total proceeds received in the transaction. Gains
on the re-issuance of treasury stock are recorded as a component
of Capital in excess of par in Stockholders Equity. Losses
on the re-issuance of treasury stock are recorded as a component
of Capital in excess of par to the extent that there are gains
to offset the losses. If there are no treasury stock gains in
Capital in excess of par, the losses upon re-issuance of
treasury stock are recorded as a component of Retained earnings
in Stockholders Equity. Cadence recorded losses on the
re-issuance of treasury stock as a component of Retained
earnings of $19.4 million and $43.9 million during the
three and six months ended June 28, 2008, respectively.
|
|
NOTE 10.
|
OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) includes foreign currency
translation gains and losses and unrealized gains and losses on
available-for-sale marketable securities, net of related tax
effects. These items have been excluded from net income (loss)
and are reflected instead in Stockholders Equity.
Cadences comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six
months ended June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
4,996
|
|
|
$
|
59,596
|
|
|
$
|
(13,751
|
)
|
|
$
|
104,017
|
|
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)
|
|
|
(3,069
|
)
|
|
|
(258
|
)
|
|
|
2,638
|
|
|
|
2,322
|
|
Changes in unrealized holding gains (losses) on
available-for-sale securities, net of reclassification
adjustment for realized gains and losses, net of related tax
effects
|
|
|
4,025
|
|
|
|
(859
|
)
|
|
|
4,918
|
|
|
|
(1,694
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
(932
|
)
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
(932
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
5,952
|
|
|
$
|
57,547
|
|
|
$
|
(6,195
|
)
|
|
$
|
103,713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
NOTE 11.
|
OTHER
INCOME (EXPENSE), NET
|
Cadences Other income (expense), net, for the three and
six months ended June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007 was
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
5,059
|
|
|
$
|
12,641
|
|
|
$
|
13,834
|
|
|
$
|
24,863
|
|
Gains on sale of non-marketable securities
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
|
|
884
|
|
|
|
5,559
|
|
Gains on sale of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
1,435
|
|
|
|
2,311
|
|
|
|
1,435
|
|
|
|
2,311
|
|
Gains (losses) on sale of non-marketable securities in
Cadences non-qualified deferred compensation trust
|
|
|
(3,388
|
)
|
|
|
884
|
|
|
|
(4,048
|
)
|
|
|
4,223
|
|
Gains (losses) on foreign exchange
|
|
|
(1,853
|
)
|
|
|
(1,081
|
)
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
(634
|
)
|
Equity in loss from investments, net
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
(1,083
|
)
|
|
|
(718
|
)
|
|
|
(1,720
|
)
|
Write-down of investment securities (Note 3)
|
|
|
(2,903
|
)
|
|
|
(550
|
)
|
|
|
(8,304
|
)
|
|
|
(550
|
)
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
(315
|
)
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
(315
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
(1,750
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,207
|
|
|
$
|
4,013
|
|
|
$
|
33,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 12.
|
STATEMENT
OF CASH FLOWS
|
The supplemental cash flow information for the six months ended
June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash Paid During the Period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
3,594
|
|
|
$
|
3,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes, including foreign withholding tax
|
|
$
|
21,555
|
|
|
$
|
8,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options assumed for acquisitions
|
|
$
|
1,140
|
|
|
$
|
----
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock issued for payment under a performance-based
bonus plan
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
$
|
5,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, net of
taxes
|
|
$
|
4,918
|
|
|
$
|
(1,694
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual for executed and unsettled stock purchases
|
|
$
|
5,258
|
|
|
$
|
----
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cadence adopted FASB Interpretation, or FIN, No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes An
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, on
December 31, 2006, the first day of fiscal 2007. The
cumulative effect of adopting FIN No. 48 was reported
as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings (or
other appropriate components of equity or net assets) in the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, which amounts were
non-cash items in Cadences Statement of Cash Flows for the
six months ended June 30, 2007.
|
|
NOTE 13.
|
SEGMENT
AND GEOGRAPHY REPORTING
|
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information, requires disclosures
of certain information regarding operating segments, products
and services, geographic areas of operation and major customers.
SFAS No. 131 reporting is based upon the
management approach: how management organizes
18
the companys operating segments for which separate
financial information is (i) available and
(ii) evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision
maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing
performance. Cadences chief operating decision maker is
its President and Chief Executive Officer, or CEO.
Cadences CEO reviews Cadences consolidated results
within one segment. In making operating decisions, the CEO
primarily considers consolidated financial information,
accompanied by disaggregated information about revenues by
geographic region.
Outside the United States, Cadence markets and supports its
products and services primarily through its subsidiaries.
Revenue is attributed to geography based on the country in which
the product is used or services are delivered. Long-lived assets
are attributed to geography based on the country where the
assets are located.
The following table presents a summary of revenue by geography:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Americas:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
150,071
|
|
|
$
|
195,477
|
|
|
$
|
259,623
|
|
|
$
|
363,426
|
|
Other Americas
|
|
|
9,160
|
|
|
|
8,916
|
|
|
|
15,377
|
|
|
|
16,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Americas
|
|
|
159,231
|
|
|
|
204,393
|
|
|
|
275,000
|
|
|
|
380,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
12,458
|
|
|
|
18,801
|
|
|
|
28,854
|
|
|
|
32,020
|
|
Other Europe, Middle East and Africa
|
|
|
56,900
|
|
|
|
47,128
|
|
|
|
103,756
|
|
|
|
87,362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Europe, Middle East and Africa
|
|
|
69,358
|
|
|
|
65,929
|
|
|
|
132,610
|
|
|
|
119,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan and Asia:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
60,774
|
|
|
|
55,509
|
|
|
|
135,861
|
|
|
|
153,591
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
40,115
|
|
|
|
65,130
|
|
|
|
73,196
|
|
|
|
103,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Japan and Asia
|
|
|
100,889
|
|
|
|
120,639
|
|
|
|
209,057
|
|
|
|
256,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
329,478
|
|
|
$
|
390,961
|
|
|
$
|
616,667
|
|
|
$
|
756,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No one customer accounted for 10% of total revenue during the
three months ended June 28, 2008 and one customer accounted
for 18% of total revenue for the three months ended
June 30, 2007. No one customer accounted for 10% of total
revenue during the six months ended June 28, 2008 and one
customer accounted for 11% of total revenue for the six months
ended June 30, 2007.
As of June 28, 2008, two customers each accounted for 10%
of Cadences Receivables, net and Installment contract
receivables. As of December 29, 2007, one customer
accounted for 11% and one customer accounted for 10% of
Cadences Receivables, net and Installment contract
receivables.
19
The following table presents a summary of long-lived assets by
geography:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Americas:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
320,971
|
|
|
$
|
303,347
|
|
Other Americas
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Americas
|
|
|
321,024
|
|
|
|
303,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
|
|
1,269
|
|
Other Europe, Middle East and Africa
|
|
|
6,856
|
|
|
|
7,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Europe, Middle East and Africa
|
|
|
7,962
|
|
|
|
9,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan and Asia:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
6,166
|
|
|
|
1,070
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
23,871
|
|
|
|
25,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Japan and Asia
|
|
|
30,037
|
|
|
|
27,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
359,023
|
|
|
$
|
339,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with
the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and notes
thereto included in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q,
or this Quarterly Report, and in conjunction with our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007. Certain of
these statements, including, without limitation, statements
regarding the extent and timing of future revenues and expenses
and customer demand, statements regarding the deployment of our
products, statements regarding our reliance on third parties and
other statements using words such as anticipates,
believes, could, estimates,
expects, intends, may,
plans, should, will and
would, and words of similar import and the negatives
thereof, constitute forward-looking statements. These statements
are predictions based upon our current expectations about future
events. Actual results could vary materially as a result of
certain factors, including but not limited to, those expressed
in these statements. We refer you to the Risk
Factors, Results of Operations,
Disclosures About Market Risk, and Liquidity
and Capital Resources sections contained in this Quarterly
Report, and the risks discussed in our other Securities Exchange
Commission, or SEC, filings, which identify important risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those contained in the forward-looking
statements.
We urge you to consider these factors carefully in evaluating
the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly
Report. All subsequent written or oral forward-looking
statements attributable to our company or persons acting on our
behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these
cautionary statements. The forward-looking statements included
in this Quarterly Report are made only as of the date of this
Quarterly Report. We do not intend, and undertake no obligation,
to update these forward-looking statements.
Overview
We develop electronic design automation, or EDA, software and
hardware. We license software, sell or lease hardware
technology, provide maintenance for our software and hardware
and provide design, methodology and education services
throughout the world to help manage and accelerate electronics
product development processes. Our broad range of products and
services are used by the worlds leading electronics
companies to design and develop complex integrated circuits, or
ICs, and electronics systems.
We primarily generate revenue from licensing our EDA software,
selling or leasing our hardware technology, providing
maintenance for our software and hardware and providing design
and methodology services. Our revenue recognition is
significantly affected by the mix of license types executed in
any given period. Our revenue may also be deferred until
payments become due and payable or cash is received from certain
customers and for certain contracts. Substantially all of our
revenue is generated from IC manufacturers, IC designers and
electronics systems companies and is dependent upon their
commencement of new design projects. As a result, our revenue is
significantly influenced by our customers business outlook
and investment in the introduction of new products and the
improvement of existing products.
We have identified certain items that management uses as
performance indicators to manage our business, including
revenue, certain elements of operating expenses and cash flow
from operations, and we describe these items more fully below
under the heading Results of Operations and
Liquidity and Capital Resources.
During 2007 and the first six months of 2008, we saw increasing
pressures on the research and development budgets in our
customer base due to the deceleration of growth in the
electronics systems and semiconductor industries and the
deteriorating macroeconomic environment. In this slowing and
price-conscious environment, customers are looking for more
flexibility in the type of software and hardware products they
purchase and how and when they purchase them.
Facing uncertainty and cost pressures in their own businesses,
some of our customers are waiting to purchase our products as
long as they can and are increasingly seeking even more
aggressive purchasing terms and conditions. As a result of this
trend, we have forecasted lower business levels for the
remainder of 2008. In addition, our recent announcement of the
proposed acquisition of Mentor Graphics Corporation, or Mentor
Graphics, has caused some customers to demand more flexibility
in accessing new technology. To enable us to keep our focus on
21
the value of our technology and to assist with customer demands,
we are moving to a license mix that will provide our customers
with greater flexibility and will result in increased ratable
revenue for us.
Our operating results are affected by the mix of license types
executed in any given period. We license software using three
different license types: subscription, term and perpetual.
Product revenue associated with term and perpetual licenses is
generally recognized at the beginning of the license period,
whereas product revenue associated with subscription licenses is
recognized over multiple periods during the term of the license.
In order to provide our customers with the desired flexibility,
our license mix will change to a higher proportion of licenses
that require ratable revenue recognition which will result in a
decrease in our expected revenue for the second half of fiscal
year 2008.
We plan operating expense levels primarily based on forecasted
revenue levels. These expenses and the impact of long-term
commitments are relatively fixed in the short term. However, a
shortfall in revenue could lead to operating results below
expectations because we may not be able to quickly reduce these
fixed expenses in response to these short-term business changes.
To offset some of the impact of our expected decrease in
revenue, we have implemented cost savings initiatives, including
reducing headcount, decreasing employee bonuses and reducing
other discretionary spending. Due to the change in license mix
noted above, we will recognize a net loss for fiscal 2008.
Semiconductor volumes grew during 2007 and have grown during the
first six months of 2008, fueled by strong consumer demand in
traditional and emerging markets, but at the same time, average
selling prices have declined. Product performance and size
specifications of the mobile and other consumer electronics
market are requiring electronic systems to be smaller, consume
less power and provide multiple functions in one
system-on-chip,
or SoC, or
system-in-package,
or SiP. The design challenge is also becoming more complex with
each new generation of electronics and as providers of EDA
solutions are required to deliver products that address these
technical challenges and improve the efficiency and productivity
of the design process.
With the addition of emerging nanometer design considerations to
the already burgeoning set of traditional design tasks, complex
SoC or IC design can no longer be accomplished using a
collection of discrete design tools. What previously consisted
of sequential design activities must be merged and accomplished
nearly simultaneously without time-consuming data translation
steps. We combine our design technologies into
platforms addressing four major design activities:
functional verification, digital IC design, custom IC design and
system interconnect design. The four
Cadence®
design platforms are
Incisive®
functional verification,
Encounter®
digital IC design,
Virtuoso®
custom design and
Allegro®
system interconnect design platforms. In addition, we augment
these platform product offerings with a set of design for
manufacturing, or DFM, products that service both the digital
and custom IC design flows. These four platforms, together with
our DFM products, comprise our primary product lines.
Proposed
Acquisition of Mentor Graphics Corporation
On May 2, 2008, we made a proposal to the board of
directors of Mentor Graphics to acquire all of the outstanding
shares of Mentor Graphics common stock for cash consideration of
$16.00 per Mentor Graphics share, representing a total value of
approximately $1.6 billion. On May 23, 2008, the
Mentor Graphics board of directors informed us that it did not
wish to pursue discussions with us given Mentor Graphics
desire to stay independent. On June 17, 2008, we publicly
announced our offer and Mentor Graphics publicly confirmed that
it received an unsolicited offer from us and that it previously
rejected our offer. We currently expect to borrow in excess of
$1.0 billion if we are successful in acquiring all of
Mentor Graphics outstanding shares and we are currently
reviewing various alternatives for financing this transaction.
There are no assurances that the acquisition will be completed
or that financing will be available on terms that are acceptable
to us.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
In preparing our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, we
make assumptions, judgments and estimates that can have a
significant impact on our revenue, operating income and net
income, as well as on the value of certain assets and
liabilities on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. We
base our assumptions, judgments and estimates on historical
experience and various other factors that we believe to be
reasonable under
22
the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from
these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. At
least quarterly, we evaluate our assumptions, judgments and
estimates and make changes accordingly. Historically, our
assumptions, judgments and estimates relative to our critical
accounting estimates have not differed materially from actual
results.
For further information about our other critical accounting
estimates, see the discussion under the heading Critical
Accounting Estimates in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007.
Results
of Operations
We primarily generate revenue from licensing our EDA software,
selling or leasing our hardware technology, providing
maintenance for our software and hardware and providing design
and methodology services. We principally utilize three license
types: subscription, term and perpetual. The different license
types provide a customer with different terms of use for our
products, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
The right to access new technology;
|
|
|
The duration of the license; and
|
|
|
Payment terms.
|
Customer decisions regarding these aspects of license
transactions determine the license type, timing of revenue
recognition and potential future business activity. For example,
if a customer chooses a fixed term of use, this will result in
either a subscription or term license. A business implication of
this decision is that, at the expiration of the license period,
the customer must decide whether to continue using the
technology and therefore renew the license agreement. Because
larger customers generally use products from two or more of our
five product groups, rarely will a large customer completely
terminate its relationship with us at expiration of the license.
See the discussion under the heading Critical Accounting
Estimates in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007 for additional
description of license types and timing of revenue recognition.
Although we believe that pricing volatility has not generally
been a material component of the change in our revenue from
period to period, we believe that the amount of revenue
recognized in future periods will depend on, among other things,
the competitiveness of our new technology, the length of our
sales cycle, and the size, duration, terms, type and timing of
our:
|
|
|
|
|
Contract renewals with existing customers;
|
|
|
Additional sales to existing customers; and
|
|
|
Sales to new customers.
|
A substantial portion of our total revenue is recognized over
multiple periods. However, a significant portion of our product
revenue is recognized upon delivery of licensed software, which
generally occurs upon the later of the effective date of the
arrangement or delivery of the software product.
The value and duration of contracts, and consequently product
revenue recognized, is affected by the competitiveness of our
products. Product revenue recognized in any period is also
affected by the extent to which customers purchase subscription,
term or perpetual licenses, and the extent to which contracts
contain flexible payment terms. The timing of revenue
recognition is also affected by changes in the extent to which
existing contracts contain flexible payment terms and by changes
in contractual arrangements with existing customers (e.g.,
customers transitioning from subscription license arrangements
to term license arrangements).
Revenue
and Revenue Mix
We analyze our software and hardware businesses by product
group, combining revenues for both product and maintenance
because of their interrelationship. We have formulated a design
solution strategy that combines our design technologies into
platforms, which are included in the various product
groups described below.
Our product groups are:
Functional Verification: Products in this
group, which include the Incisive functional verification
platform, are used to verify that the high level, logical
representation of an IC design is functionally correct.
23
Digital IC Design: Products in this group,
which include the Encounter digital IC design platform, are used
to accurately convert the high-level, logical representation of
a digital IC into a detailed physical blueprint and then
detailed design information showing how the IC will be
physically implemented. This data is used for creation of the
photomasks used in chip manufacture.
Custom IC Design: Our custom design products,
which include the Virtuoso custom design platform, are used for
ICs that must be designed at the transistor level, including
analog, radio frequency, memories, high performance digital
blocks and standard cell libraries. Detailed design information
showing how an IC will be physically implemented is used for
creation of the photomasks used in chip manufacture.
System Interconnect Design: This product group
consists of our printed circuit board, or PCB, and IC package
design products, including the Allegro and
OrCAD®
products. The Allegro system interconnect design platform
enables consistent co-design of interconnects across ICs, IC
packages and PCBs, while the OrCAD line focuses on
cost-effective, entry-level PCB solutions.
Design for Manufacturing: Included in this
product group are our physical verification and analysis
products. These products are used to analyze and verify that the
physical blueprint of the IC has been constructed correctly and
can be manufactured successfully.
Revenue
by Period
The following table shows our revenue for the three and six
months ended June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007 and the
percentage change in revenue between periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
195.5
|
|
|
$
|
263.8
|
|
|
|
(26)%
|
|
|
$
|
351.7
|
|
|
$
|
501.7
|
|
|
|
(30)%
|
Services
|
|
|
33.7
|
|
|
|
32.8
|
|
|
|
3%
|
|
|
|
65.9
|
|
|
|
64.7
|
|
|
|
2%
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
100.3
|
|
|
|
94.4
|
|
|
|
6%
|
|
|
|
199.1
|
|
|
|
189.7
|
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
329.5
|
|
|
$
|
391.0
|
|
|
|
(16)%
|
|
|
$
|
616.7
|
|
|
$
|
756.1
|
|
|
|
(18)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue decreased in the three and six months ended
June 28, 2008, as compared to the three and six months
ended June 30, 2007, primarily because of a challenging
economic environment and a longer sales cycle. As a result,
product revenue decreased for all product groups, and
particularly for Digital IC Design, Design for Manufacturing,
Functional Verification and Custom IC Design products.
Our product revenue is affected by the mix of license types
executed in any given period. We license software using three
different license types: subscription, term and perpetual.
Product revenue associated with term and perpetual licenses is
generally recognized at the beginning of the license period,
whereas product revenue associated with subscription licenses is
recognized over multiple periods during the term of the license.
Our expected revenue for the second half of fiscal 2008 will
decrease due to the slowing and price-conscious environment, as
well as changes to our license mix, which will result in a
higher proportion of revenue recognized over multiple periods
during the term of the license and decreased revenue recognized
at the beginning of the license.
We have determined that Product revenue totaling
$8.4 million recognized during the three months ended
June 28, 2008 should have been recognized during the three
months ended March 29, 2008. The effect on the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for the three months ended
June 28, 2008 and March 29, 2008 is not considered
material, and there is no effect to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for the six months ended June 28, 2008.
24
Revenue
by Product Group
The following table shows for the past five consecutive quarters
the percentage of product and related maintenance revenue
contributed by each of our five product groups, and Services and
other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Functional Verification
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
26%
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
24%
|
|
Digital IC Design
|
|
|
23%
|
|
|
|
27%
|
|
|
|
27%
|
|
|
|
27%
|
|
|
|
29%
|
|
Custom IC Design
|
|
|
26%
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
|
32%
|
|
|
|
24%
|
|
System Interconnect
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
|
11%
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
|
8%
|
|
Design for Manufacturing
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
|
6%
|
|
|
|
6%
|
|
|
|
6%
|
|
|
|
7%
|
|
Services and other
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
11%
|
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
|
8%
|
|
|
|
8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As described under the heading Critical Accounting
Estimates in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007, certain of our
licenses allow customers the ability to remix among software
products. Additionally, we have licensed a combination of our
products to customers with the actual product selection and
number of licensed users to be determined at a later date. For
these arrangements, we estimate the allocation of the revenue to
product groups based upon the expected usage of our products by
these customers. The actual usage of our products by these
customers may differ and, if that proves to be the case, the
revenue allocation in the above table would differ.
Although we believe the methodology of allocating revenue to
product groups is reasonable, there can be no assurance that
such allocated amounts reflect the amounts that would result had
the customer individually licensed each specific software
solution at the outset of the arrangement.
Revenue
by Geography
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
150.0
|
|
|
$
|
195.5
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)%
|
|
$
|
259.6
|
|
|
$
|
363.4
|
|
|
|
(29)%
|
|
Other Americas
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
|
16.6
|
|
|
|
(7)%
|
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa
|
|
|
69.4
|
|
|
|
66.0
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
132.6
|
|
|
|
119.4
|
|
|
|
11%
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
60.8
|
|
|
|
55.5
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
135.9
|
|
|
|
153.6
|
|
|
|
(12)%
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
40.1
|
|
|
|
65.1
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)%
|
|
|
73.2
|
|
|
|
103.1
|
|
|
|
(29)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
329.5
|
|
|
$
|
391.0
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
|
$
|
616.7
|
|
|
$
|
756.1
|
|
|
|
(18)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Revenue
by Geography as a Percent of Total Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
46%
|
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
|
42%
|
|
|
|
48%
|
|
Other Americas
|
|
|
3%
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
|
3%
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa
|
|
|
21%
|
|
|
|
17%
|
|
|
|
21%
|
|
|
|
16%
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
18%
|
|
|
|
14%
|
|
|
|
22%
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
|
17%
|
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
|
14%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The rate of revenue change varies geographically primarily due
to differences in the timing and size of term licenses in those
regions. No one customer accounted for 10% or more of total
revenue for the three months ended June 28, 2008 and one
customer accounted for 18% of total revenue for the three months
ended June 30, 2007. No one customer accounted for 10% or
more of total revenue for the six months ended June 28,
2008 and one customer accounted for 11% of total revenue for the
six months ended June 30, 2007.
Most of our revenue is transacted in the United States dollar.
However, certain revenue transactions are in foreign currencies,
primarily the Japanese yen, and we recognize additional revenue
in periods when the United States dollar weakens in value
against the Japanese yen. For additional description of how
changes in foreign exchange rates affect our Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements, see the discussion under the
heading Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk Disclosures About
Market Risk Foreign Currency Risk below.
Stock-based
Compensation Expense Summary
Stock-based compensation expense is reflected throughout our
costs and expenses as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Cost of product
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
----
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
Cost of services
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
Cost of maintenance
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Marketing and sales
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
19.2
|
|
|
|
25.7
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
21.5
|
|
|
$
|
27.0
|
|
|
$
|
43.0
|
|
|
$
|
54.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended June 28, 2008, stock-based
compensation expense decreased $5.5 million, as compared to
the three months ended June 30, 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $3.4 million in stock-compensation expense
for restricted stock and stock bonuses, primarily due to new
grants of restricted stock being valued at a lower stock price
and a decrease in stock bonuses; and
|
|
|
A decrease of $2.9 million in stock-compensation expense
for stock options, primarily due to our increased use of
restricted stock instead of stock options in recent years;
partially offset by
|
|
|
An increase of $0.8 million in stock-compensation expense
primarily due to an increase in purchase rights granted under
our ESPP during the current period.
|
26
During the six months ended June 28, 2008, stock-based
compensation expense decreased $11.7 million, as compared
to the six months ended June 30, 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $7.5 million in stock-compensation expense
for restricted stock and stock bonuses, primarily due to new
grants of restricted stock being valued at a lower stock price
and a decrease in stock bonuses; and
|
|
|
A decrease of $5.9 million in stock-compensation expense
for stock options, primarily due to our increased use of
restricted stock instead of stock options in recent years;
partially offset by
|
|
|
An increase of $1.7 million in stock-compensation expense
primarily due to an increase in purchase rights granted under
our ESPP during the current period.
|
Cost
of Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
18.0
|
|
|
$
|
12.8
|
|
|
41%
|
|
$
|
30.0
|
|
|
$
|
28.5
|
|
|
5%
|
Services
|
|
$
|
27.2
|
|
|
$
|
23.4
|
|
|
16%
|
|
$
|
52.4
|
|
|
$
|
47.1
|
|
|
11%
|
Maintenance
|
|
$
|
14.4
|
|
|
$
|
15.3
|
|
|
(6)%
|
|
$
|
29.0
|
|
|
$
|
30.4
|
|
|
(5)%
|
Cost
of Revenue as a Percent of Related Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
|
6%
|
|
Services
|
|
|
81%
|
|
|
|
71%
|
|
|
|
80%
|
|
|
|
73%
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
14%
|
|
|
|
16%
|
|
|
|
15%
|
|
|
|
16%
|
|
Cost of product includes costs associated with the sale or lease
of our hardware and licensing of our software products. Cost of
product primarily includes the cost of employee salary, benefits
and other employee-related costs, including stock-based
compensation expense, amortization of acquired intangibles
directly related to our products, the cost of technical
documentation and royalties payable to third-party vendors. Cost
of product associated with our hardware products also includes
materials, assembly and overhead. These additional manufacturing
costs make our cost of hardware product higher, as a percentage
of revenue, than our cost of software product.
A summary of Cost of product is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Product related costs
|
|
$
|
13.2
|
|
|
$
|
7.6
|
|
|
$
|
20.6
|
|
|
$
|
17.7
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangibles
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cost of product
|
|
$
|
18.0
|
|
|
$
|
12.8
|
|
|
$
|
30.0
|
|
|
$
|
28.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended June 28, 2008, Cost of
product increased $5.2 million, as compared to the three
months ended June 30, 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase of $7.3 million in hardware costs attributable
to sales of hardware products with higher costs and increased
hardware sales; partially offset by
|
|
|
A decrease of $1.3 million in amortization of license costs
related to third-party technology.
|
27
During the six months ended June 28, 2008, Cost of product
increased $1.5 million, as compared to the six months ended
June 30, 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase of $4.7 million in hardware costs attributable
primarily to increased hardware sales; partially offset by
|
|
|
A decrease of $1.5 million in amortization of license costs
related to third-party technology; and
|
|
|
A decrease of $1.4 million in amortization of acquired
intangible assets because certain acquired intangible assets
became fully amortized during the period.
|
Cost of product depends primarily upon the extent to which we
acquire intangible assets, acquire licenses and incorporate
third-party technology in our products that are licensed or sold
in any given period, and the actual mix of hardware and software
product sales in any given period.
Cost of services primarily includes employee salary, benefits
and other employee-related costs, costs to maintain the
infrastructure necessary to manage a services organization, and
provisions for contract losses, if any. During the three months
ended June 28, 2008, Cost of services increased
$3.8 million, as compared to the three months ended
June 30, 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase of $1.6 million in facilities and other
infrastructure costs; and
|
|
|
An increase of $1.5 million in employee salary, benefits
and other employee-related costs.
|
During the six months ended June 28, 2008, Cost of services
increased $5.3 million, as compared to the six months ended
June 30, 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase of $2.8 million in facilities and other
infrastructure costs;
|
|
|
An increase of $1.8 million in salary, benefits and other
employee-related costs; and
|
|
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2007 we recognized a
gain of $0.9 million on the sale of land and buildings that
related to and accordingly reduced the overall Cost of services
for that period. There was no similar reduction during the six
months ended June 28, 2008.
|
Cost of maintenance includes the cost of customer services, such
as hot-line and
on-site
support, employee salary, benefits and other employee-related
costs, and documentation of maintenance updates. There were no
material fluctuations in these components of Cost of maintenance
during the three months ended June 28, 2008, as compared to
the three months ended June 30, 2007. During the six months
ended June 28, 2008, Cost of maintenance decreased
$1.4 million, as compared to the six months ended
June 30, 2007, primarily due to a decrease in salary,
benefits and other employee-related costs.
Operating
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
Marketing and sales
|
|
$
|
89.9
|
|
|
$
|
98.1
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
$
|
182.9
|
|
|
$
|
200.8
|
|
|
|
(9)%
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
120.1
|
|
|
|
123.0
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
245.4
|
|
|
|
240.0
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
|
|
41.8
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
|
|
72.7
|
|
|
|
82.4
|
|
|
|
(12)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
$
|
245.0
|
|
|
$
|
262.9
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
$
|
501.0
|
|
|
$
|
523.2
|
|
|
|
(4)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Expenses as a Percent of Total Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Marketing and sales
|
|
|
27%
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
|
30%
|
|
|
|
27%
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
36%
|
|
|
|
31%
|
|
|
|
40%
|
|
|
|
32%
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
11%
|
|
|
|
11%
|
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
|
11%
|
|
28
Operating
Expense Summary
Operating expenses decreased $17.9 million during the three
months ended June 28, 2008, as compared to the three months
ended June 30, 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $9.1 million in salary, benefits and other
employee-related costs;
|
|
|
A decrease of $5.8 million in stock-based compensation;
|
|
|
A decrease of $3.4 million in travel and customer
conference costs;
|
|
|
A decrease of $2.0 million in legal and other professional
services costs; and
|
|
|
A decrease of $1.2 million in losses on the sale of
installment contract receivables; partially offset by
|
|
|
An increase of $5.5 million in facilities and other
infrastructure costs.
|
Operating expenses decreased $22.2 million during the six
months ended June 28, 2008, as compared to the six months
ended June 30, 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $13.7 million in salary, benefits and other
employee-related costs;
|
|
|
A decrease of $12.0 million in stock-based compensation;
|
|
|
A decrease of $5.7 million in travel and customer
conference costs;
|
|
|
A decrease of $3.9 million in legal and other professional
services costs; and
|
|
|
A decrease of $2.2 million in losses on the sale of
installment contract receivables; partially offset by
|
|
|
An increase of $8.9 million in facilities and other
infrastructure costs; and
|
|
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2007, we recognized a
gain of $7.9 million on the sale of land and buildings that
related to and accordingly reduced Operating expenses for that
period. There was no similar reduction during the six months
ended June 28, 2008.
|
In January 2007, we completed the sale of certain land and
buildings in San Jose, California for a sales price of
$46.5 million in cash. Concurrently with the sale, we
leased back from the purchaser approximately 262,500 square
feet of office space, which represents all available space in
the buildings. A substantial portion of the gain upon sale
offset our costs and expenses during the three months ended
March 31, 2007, and the remaining gain will be amortized
over the remaining initial lease term.
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily due
to the decrease in the valuation of the United States dollar
when compared to the European Union euro, the Indian rupee and
the Japanese yen, increased operating expenses by
$4.9 million in the three months ended June 28, 2008,
as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007, and
increased operating expenses by $9.8 million in the six
months ended June 28, 2008, as compared to the six months
ended June 30, 2007.
Marketing
and Sales
Marketing and sales expense decreased $8.2 million during
the three months ended June 28, 2008, as compared to the
three months ended June 30, 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $6.1 million in salary, benefits and other
employee-related costs; and
|
|
|
A decrease of $2.2 million in travel and customer
conference costs; partially offset by
|
|
|
An increase of $1.4 million in facilities and other
infrastructure costs.
|
Marketing and sales expense decreased $17.9 million during
the six months ended June 28, 2008, as compared to the six
months ended June 30, 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $14.7 million in salary, benefits and other
employee-related costs;
|
|
|
A decrease of $4.3 million in travel and customer
conference costs; and
|
|
|
A decrease of $2.9 million in stock-based compensation;
partially offset by
|
|
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2007, we recognized a
gain of $2.8 million on the sale of land and buildings that
related to and accordingly reduced Marketing and sales expense
for that period. There was no similar reduction during the six
months ended June 28, 2008; and
|
|
|
An increase of $2.5 million in facilities and other
infrastructure costs.
|
29
Research
and Development
Research and development expense decreased $2.9 million
during the three months ended June 28, 2008, as compared to
the three months ended June 30, 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $3.1 million in stock-based
compensation; and
|
|
|
A decrease of $1.0 million in travel costs; partially
offset by
|
|
|
An increase of $2.9 million in facilities and other
infrastructure costs.
|
Research and development expense increased $5.4 million
during the six months ended June 28, 2008, as compared to
the six months ended June 30, 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase of $5.6 million in facilities and other
infrastructure costs;
|
|
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2007, we recognized a
gain of $4.7 million on the sale of land and buildings that
related to and accordingly reduced Research and development
expense for that period. There was no similar reduction during
the six months ended June 28, 2008; and
|
|
|
An increase of $4.3 million in salary, benefits and other
employee-related costs, primarily due to an increase in the
number of employees supporting product development, our
acquisitions of Clear Shape Technologies, Inc. and Invarium,
Inc., and increases in salary costs generally; partially offset
by
|
|
|
A decrease of $6.5 million in stock-based compensation;
|
|
|
A decrease of $2.2 million in professional services
costs; and
|
|
|
A decrease of $1.4 million in travel costs.
|
General
and Administrative
General and administrative expense decreased $6.8 million
during the three months ended June 28, 2008, as compared to
the three months ended June 30, 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $2.6 million in salary, benefits and other
employee-related costs;
|
|
|
A decrease of $2.1 million in stock-based compensation;
|
|
|
A decrease of $1.4 million in depreciation, computer
equipment lease costs and maintenance costs associated with
third-party software;
|
|
|
A decrease of $1.3 million in legal and other professional
services costs; and
|
|
|
A decrease of $1.2 million in losses on the sale of
installment contract receivables; partially offset by
|
|
|
An increase of $1.1 million in facilities and other
infrastructure costs.
|
General and administrative expense decreased $9.7 million
during the six months ended June 28, 2008, as compared to
the six months ended June 30, 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $3.3 million in salary, benefits and other
employee-related costs;
|
|
|
A decrease of $2.6 million in stock-based compensation;
|
|
|
A decrease of $2.3 million in depreciation, computer
equipment lease costs and maintenance costs associated with
third-party software;
|
|
|
A decrease of $2.2 million in losses on the sale of
installment contract receivables; and
|
|
|
A decrease of $1.9 million in legal and other professional
services costs.
|
Amortization
of Acquired Intangibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangibles
|
|
$
|
5.8
|
|
|
$
|
4.4
|
|
|
$
|
11.6
|
|
|
$
|
8.9
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangibles increased $1.4 million
during the three months ended June 28, 2008, as compared to
the three months ended June 30, 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase of $2.0 million of amortization for intangibles
acquired in 2007 and 2008; partially offset by
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $0.6 million of amortization for intangible
assets from prior year acquisitions that became fully amortized
during 2007 and 2008.
|
Amortization of acquired intangibles increased $2.7 million
during the six months ended June 28, 2008, as compared to
the six months ended June 30, 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase of $4.4 million of amortization for intangibles
acquired in 2007 and 2008; partially offset by
|
|
|
A decrease of $1.7 million of amortization for intangible
assets from prior year acquisitions that became fully amortized
during 2007 and 2008.
|
Write-off
of Acquired In-process Technology
In connection with the acquisition completed during the six
months ended June 28, 2008, we immediately charged to
expense $0.6 million representing certain acquired
in-process technologies that had not yet reached technological
feasibility and had no alternative future use. The value
assigned to acquired in-process technology was determined by
identifying research projects in areas for which technological
feasibility had not been established. The value was determined
by estimating costs to develop the various acquired in-process
technologies into commercially viable products, estimating the
resulting net cash flows from such projects and discounting the
net cash flows back to their present value. The discount rate
assumed in these calculations was 22% and included factors that
reflect the uncertainty surrounding successful development of
the acquired in-process technology. The in-process technologies
became commercially viable in June 2008 at a cost of
approximately $0.2 million, but will require further
research and development even though they have reached a state
of technological and commercial feasibility.
Interest
Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
2.9
|
|
|
$
|
3.1
|
|
|
$
|
5.9
|
|
|
$
|
6.5
|
|
During the three and six months ended June 28, 2008 and
June 30, 2007, the primary component of interest expense
was the Convertible Senior Notes. The decrease in interest
expense for the six months ended June 28, 2008, as compared
to the six months ended June 30, 2007, was primarily due to
the repayment in full of our Term Loan during the three months
ended March 31, 2007.
31
Other
income (expense), net
Other income (expense), net, for the three and six months ended
June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
5.1
|
|
|
$
|
12.6
|
|
|
$
|
13.8
|
|
|
$
|
24.8
|
|
Gains on sale of non-marketable securities
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
Gains on sale of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Gains (losses) on sale of non-marketable and trading securities
in Cadences non-qualified deferred compensation trust
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Gains (losses) on foreign exchange
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Equity losses from investments
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
Write-down of investments
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
14.2
|
|
|
$
|
4.0
|
|
|
$
|
33.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income decreased $7.5 million and
$11.0 million for the three and six months ended
June 28, 2008, respectively, as compared to the three and
six months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease was due to
lower average cash balances and lower interest rates during the
three and six months ended June 28, 2008.
During the six months ended June 28, 2008, we determined
that one of our available-for-sale securities was
other-than-temporarily impaired based on the severity and the
duration of the impairment and we wrote down the investment by
$5.4 million.
Income
Taxes
The following table presents the provision for income taxes and
the effective tax rate for the three and six months ended
June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
9.8
|
|
|
$
|
25.3
|
|
|
$
|
4.3
|
|
|
$
|
43.8
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
66.1%
|
|
|
|
29.8%
|
|
|
|
(45.1)%
|
|
|
|
29.6%
|
|
For interim periods, we calculate our provision for income tax
based on our current estimate of the annual effective tax rate.
See the discussion below regarding our current estimate of the
annual effective tax rate. We generally apply the estimated
annual effective tax rate to year to date pre-tax income or
loss. We adjust the provision for income tax expense for the
current quarter to reflect our current estimate of the annual
effective tax rate and period-specific items of tax expense or
benefit. Our effective tax rate for the three months ended
June 28, 2008 primarily reflects the adjustment of our
estimated annual effective tax rate for the fiscal year ending
January 3, 2009 and period-specific items of net tax
expense of $1.8 million. The largest of the period-specific
items of net tax expense was interest expense related to
unrecognized tax benefits, net of related tax effects of
$2.0 million.
Our negative effective tax rate for the six months ended
June 28, 2008 primarily reflects period-specific items of
net tax expense of $4.3 million. The largest of the
period-specific items of net tax expense was interest expense
related to unrecognized tax benefits, net of related tax
effects, of $4.2 million. Our effective tax rate was
negative for the six months ended June 28, 2008 as compared
to the positive effective tax rate for the six months ended
June 30, 2007, primarily due to the Loss before provision
for income taxes and the period specific items of net tax
expense for the six months ended June 28, 2008.
32
Because we currently expect to recognize a pre-tax loss for the
year, we have revised our estimate of our annual effective tax
rate for the fiscal year ending January 3, 2009 to be
approximately (4.0)%. We anticipate having a negative effective
tax rate primarily as a result of tax expense on certain of our
foreign earnings and interest expense on our unrecognized tax
benefits which is partially offset by the tax benefit of losses
recognized in certain tax jurisdictions. However, we expect that
the effective tax rate for interim reporting periods will vary
from the estimated annual effective tax rate. Our effective tax
rate for the year ended December 29, 2007 was 18.6%.
During the three months ended June 28, 2008, we recognized
a $7.9 million decrease in the net liabilities for
unrecognized tax benefits based on new information received
during the period, which we accounted for as a $7.9 million
increase in the balance of Common stock and capital in excess of
par value.
The IRS and other tax authorities regularly examine our income
tax returns. In July 2006, the IRS completed its field
examination of our federal income tax returns for the tax years
2000 through 2002 and issued a Revenue Agents Report, or
RAR, in which the IRS proposed to assess an aggregate tax
deficiency for the three-year period of approximately
$324.0 million. In November 2006, the IRS revised the
proposed aggregate tax deficiency for the three-year period to
be approximately $318.0 million. The IRS is contesting our
qualification for deferred recognition of certain proceeds
received from restitution and settlement in connection with
litigation during the period. The proposed tax deficiency for
this item is approximately $152.0 million. The remaining
proposed tax deficiency of approximately $166.0 million is
primarily related to proposed adjustments to our transfer
pricing arrangements with our foreign subsidiaries and to our
deductions for foreign trade income. The IRS may make similar
claims against our transfer pricing arrangements and deductions
for foreign trade income in future examinations. We have filed a
timely protest with the IRS and will seek resolution of the
issues with the Appeals Office of the IRS, or the Appeals Office.
We believe that the proposed IRS adjustments are inconsistent
with applicable tax laws and we are vigorously challenging these
proposed adjustments. The RAR is not a final Statutory Notice of
Deficiency but the IRS imposes interest on the proposed
deficiencies until the matters are resolved. Interest is
compounded daily at rates that are published and adjusted
quarterly by the IRS and have been between 4% and 10% since
2001. The IRS is currently examining our federal income tax
returns for the tax years 2003 through 2005.
We believe that it is reasonably possible that the total amounts
of unrecognized tax benefits for our transfer pricing
arrangements with our foreign subsidiaries could significantly
increase or decrease during the fiscal year ending
January 3, 2009 if the Appeals Office develops new
settlement guidelines that change our measurement of the tax
benefits to be recognized upon effective settlement with the
IRS. Because of the uncertain impact of any potential settlement
guidelines, we cannot currently provide an estimate of the range
of the reasonably possible change.
We also believe that it is reasonably possible that the total
amounts of unrecognized tax benefits related to the value of
stock options included in our cost sharing arrangements with our
foreign subsidiaries could significantly increase or decrease
during the fiscal year ending January 3, 2009 based on the
outcome of the IRS appeal of Xilinx, Inc. v. Commissioner,
which is before the U.S. Court of Appeal for the Ninth
Circuit. We believe that the range of reasonably possible change
is an increase in unrecognized tax benefits of $6.4 million
to a decrease of unrecognized tax benefit of $1.6 million.
Significant judgment is required in applying the principles of
FASB Interpretation, or FIN, No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109, and Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard, or SFAS, No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes. The calculation of our provision for income
taxes involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of
complex tax laws and regulations. In determining the adequacy of
our provision for income taxes, we regularly assess the
potential settlement outcomes resulting from income tax
examinations. However, the final outcome of tax examinations,
including the total amount payable or the timing of any such
payments upon resolution of these issues, cannot be estimated
with certainty. In addition, we cannot be certain that such
amount will not be materially different than that which is
reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals.
Should the IRS or other tax authorities assess additional taxes
as a result of a current or a future examination, we may be
required to record charges to operations in future periods that
could have a material impact on our results of operations,
financial position or cash flows in the applicable period or
periods.
33
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and Short-term investments
|
|
$
|
889.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,078.1
|
|
Net working capital
|
|
|
602.7
|
|
|
|
744.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
57.5
|
|
|
$
|
120.1
|
|
Cash provided by (used for) investing activities
|
|
|
(93.6
|
)
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
Cash provided by (used for) financing activities
|
|
|
(192.6
|
)
|
|
|
63.2
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents and Short-term investments
As of June 28, 2008, our principal sources of liquidity
consisted of $889.3 million of Cash and cash equivalents
and Short-term investments, as compared to $1,078.1 million
as of December 29, 2007.
Our primary sources of cash in the six months ended
June 28, 2008 were:
|
|
|
|
|
Customer payments under software licenses and from the sale or
lease of our hardware products;
|
|
|
Customer payments for design and methodology services;
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of receivables; and
|
|
|
Cash received for common stock purchases under our employee
stock purchase plan.
|
Our primary uses of cash in the six months ended June 28,
2008 were:
|
|
|
|
|
Payments relating to payroll, product, services and other
operating expenses;
|
|
|
Payments to former shareholders of acquired businesses;
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment;
|
|
|
Purchases of available-for-sale investments; and
|
|
|
Purchases of treasury stock.
|
If all holders of the 2023 Notes elect to surrender their notes
for repurchase by us, we expect to use approximately
$231.0 million to repurchase all of the outstanding 2023
Notes on or about August 15, 2008, the day after the last
day by which the holders of the 2023 Notes can elect to
surrender their 2023 Notes for repurchase by us at a purchase
price of 100.25% of the principal amount thereof.
Net
working capital
Net working capital decreased $141.4 million as of
June 28, 2008, as compared to December 29, 2007,
primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $226.4 million in Cash and cash equivalents;
partially offset by
|
|
|
A decrease of $43.0 million in Accounts payable and accrued
liabilities;
|
|
|
An increase of $37.6 million in Short-term
investments; and
|
|
|
A decrease of $17.4 million in Current portion of deferred
revenue.
|
Cash
flows from operating activities
Cash flows provided by operating activities include net income
(loss), adjusted for certain non-cash charges, as well as
changes in the balances of certain assets and liabilities. Our
cash flows from operating activities are significantly
influenced by the payment terms set forth in our license
agreements and by sales of our receivables.
34
We have entered into agreements whereby we may transfer accounts
receivable to certain financing institutions on a non-recourse
or limited-recourse basis. These transfers are recorded as sales
and accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 140,
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets
and Extinguishments of Liabilities. During the six months
ended June 28, 2008, we transferred accounts receivable,
net of the losses on the sale of the receivables, totaling
$46.0 million, which approximated fair value, to financing
institutions on a non-recourse basis, as compared to
$76.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
As a result of the credit losses recorded by banks over the last
twelve months, a number of banks have become less willing to
purchase assets because of capital constraints and concerns
about over-exposure to the technology sector. In addition, due
to the change in the license mix that will result in an
increased number of subscription licenses that cannot be
transferred to financing institutions, we expect a reduced level
of Proceeds from the sale of receivables throughout the
remainder of 2008. Due to the lower order levels and the reduced
level of sale of receivables, we expect Cash flows from
operating activities to be approximately $175 million for
fiscal 2008.
Net cash provided by operating activities of $57.5 million
for the six months ended June 28, 2008 was primarily
comprised of:
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss, net of non-cash related expenses, of
$104.8 million; and
|
|
|
A decrease in Receivables, net and Installment contract
receivables of $64.3 million, net of sales of receivables,
due to the payment terms set forth in our license agreements;
partially offset by
|
|
|
A decrease in Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities of
$56.6 million;
|
|
|
A decrease in cash received for deferred revenue of
$37.2 million; and
|
|
|
A decrease in Other long-term liabilities of $12.6 million.
|
Net cash provided by operating activities of $120.1 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2007 was primarily
comprised of:
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, net of non-cash related expenses, of
$210.7 million; partially offset by
|
|
|
An increase in Receivables, net and Installment contract
receivables of $53.2 million, net of sales of receivables,
due to the payment terms set forth in our license agreements;
|
|
|
A decrease in Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities of
$19.5 million; and
|
|
|
A decrease in cash received for deferred revenue of
$16.9 million.
|
Cash
flows from investing activities
Our primary investing activities consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases and proceeds from the sale of property, plant and
equipment;
|
|
|
Purchases of available-for-sale investments;
|
|
|
Cash paid in business combinations and asset acquisitions, net
of cash acquired, and acquisition of intangibles; and
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale and long-term
investments.
|
Net cash used for investing activities was $93.6 million
for the six months ended June 28, 2008, as compared to net
cash provided by investing activities of $8.7 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2007. The change was
primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase of $31.8 million in Purchases of
available-for-sale investments; and
|
|
|
An increase of $22.8 million of Purchases of property,
plant and equipment, including payments associated with our
construction of a new building on our San Jose campus;
partially offset by
|
|
|
A decrease of $46.5 million of Proceeds from the sale of
property, plant and equipment.
|
In January 2007, we completed the sale of certain land and
buildings in San Jose, California for a sales price of
$46.5 million in cash. Concurrently with the sale, we
leased back from the purchaser all available space in the
buildings. During the lease term, we are constructing an
additional building located on our San Jose, California
campus to replace the buildings we sold in this transaction. We
expect to use approximately $20.0 million in cash during
the remainder of fiscal 2008 for construction of this new
building. We expect to continue our investing
35
activities, including purchasing property, plant and equipment,
purchasing intangible assets, purchasing software licenses and
making long-term equity investments.
In connection with our acquisitions completed prior to
June 28, 2008, we may be obligated to pay up to an
aggregate of $62.4 million in cash during the next
50 months if certain defined performance goals are achieved
in full. Of this amount, up to $51.4 million would be
expensed as compensation expense in our Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations and up to $11.0 million would be
added to the purchase price of the acquisitions and will be
recorded in Goodwill in our Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
Cash
flows from financing activities
Financing cash flows during the six months ended June 28,
2008 consisted primarily of the issuance of common stock under
certain employee plans and purchases of treasury stock.
Net cash used for financing activities increased by
$255.8 million during the six months ended June 28,
2008, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007.
The increase was primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $178.6 million in Proceeds from the sale of
common stock due to a decreased number of options exercised
during the six months ended June 28, 2008; and
|
|
|
An increase of $94.8 million in Purchases of treasury
stock; partially offset by
|
|
|
A decrease of $28.0 million of payments on our Term Loan,
the repayment of which was completed in March 2007.
|
If all holders of the 2023 Notes elect to surrender their notes
for repurchase by us, we expect to use approximately
$231.0 million to repurchase all of the outstanding 2023
Notes on or about August 15, 2008, the day after the last
day by which the holders of the 2023 Notes can elect to
surrender their 2023 Notes for repurchase by us at a purchase
price of 100.25% of the principal amount thereof.
We record a gain or loss on re-issuance of treasury stock based
on the total proceeds received in the transaction. During the
six months ended June 28, 2008, we recorded losses on the
re-issuance of treasury stock of $43.9 million as a
component of Retained earnings.
As noted above, we made a proposal to the board of directors of
Mentor Graphics to acquire all of the outstanding shares of
Mentor Graphics common stock for cash consideration of $16.00
per Mentor Graphics share, representing a total value of
approximately $1.6 billion. On June 17, 2008, we
publicly announced our offer and Mentor Graphics publicly
confirmed that it received an unsolicited offer from us and that
it previously rejected our offer. We currently expect to borrow
in excess of $1.0 billion if we are successful in acquiring
all of Mentor Graphics outstanding shares and we are
currently reviewing various alternatives for financing this
transaction. There are no assurances that the acquisition will
be completed or that financing will be available on terms that
are acceptable to us.
Other
factors affecting liquidity and capital resources
Income Taxes
We provide for United States income taxes on the earnings of our
foreign subsidiaries unless the earnings are considered
indefinitely invested outside of the United States. As of
June 28, 2008, we intend to indefinitely reinvest our
undistributed foreign earnings outside of the United States.
The IRS and other tax authorities regularly examine our income
tax returns. In July 2006, the IRS completed its field
examination of our federal income tax returns for the tax years
2000 through 2002 and issued an RAR in which the IRS proposed to
assess an aggregate tax deficiency for the three-year period of
approximately $324.0 million. In November 2006, the IRS
revised the proposed aggregate tax deficiency for the three-year
period to be approximately $318.0 million. The IRS is
contesting our qualification for deferred recognition of certain
proceeds received from restitution and settlement in connection
with litigation during the period. The proposed tax deficiency
for this item is approximately $152.0 million. The
remaining proposed tax deficiency of approximately
$166.0 million is primarily related to proposed adjustments
to our transfer pricing arrangements with our foreign
subsidiaries and to our deductions for foreign trade income. The
IRS may make similar claims against our transfer pricing
36
arrangements and deductions for foreign trade income in future
examinations. We have filed a timely protest with the IRS and
will seek resolution of the issues with the Appeals Office.
We believe that the proposed IRS adjustments are inconsistent
with applicable tax laws and we are vigorously challenging these
proposed adjustments. The RAR is not a final Statutory Notice of
Deficiency but the IRS imposes interest on the proposed
deficiencies until the matters are resolved. Interest is
compounded daily at rates published and adjusted quarterly by
the IRS and have been between 4% and 10% since 2001. The IRS is
currently examining our federal income tax returns for the tax
years 2003 through 2005.
1.375% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2011 and
1.500% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2013
In December 2006, we issued $250.0 million principal amount
of 1.375% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2011, or the 2011
Notes, and $250.0 million principal amount of
1.500% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2013, or the 2013
Notes, and collectively, the Convertible Senior Notes, to three
initial purchasers in a private placement pursuant to
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
Securities Act, for resale to qualified institutional buyers
pursuant to Rule 144A of the Securities Act. We received
net proceeds of approximately $487.0 million after
transaction fees of approximately $13.0 million, including
$12.0 million of underwriting discounts. A portion of the
net proceeds totaling $228.5 million was used to purchase
$189.6 million principal amount of our Zero Coupon Zero
Yield Senior Convertible Notes Due 2023, or the 2023 Notes.
Holders may convert their Convertible Senior Notes prior to
maturity upon the occurrence of one of the following events:
|
|
|
|
|
The price of our common stock reaches $27.50 during certain
periods of time specified in the Convertible Senior Notes;
|
|
|
Specified corporate transactions occur; or
|
|
|
The trading price of the Convertible Senior Notes falls below a
certain threshold.
|
On and after November 2, 2011, in the case of the 2011
Notes, and November 1, 2013, in the case of 2013 Notes,
until the close of business on the scheduled trading day
immediately preceding the maturity date, holders may convert
their Convertible Senior Notes at any time, regardless of the
foregoing circumstances. We may not redeem the Convertible
Senior Notes prior to maturity.
The initial conversion rate for the Convertible Senior Notes is
47.2813 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal
amount of Convertible Senior Notes, equivalent to a conversion
price of approximately $21.15 per share of our common stock.
Upon conversion, a holder will receive the sum of the daily
settlement amounts, calculated on a proportionate basis for each
day, during a specified observation period following the
conversion date. The daily settlement amount during each date of
the observation period consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash up to the principal amount of the note; and
|
|
|
Our common stock to the extent that the conversion value exceeds
the amount of cash paid upon conversion of the Convertible
Senior Notes.
|
In addition, if a fundamental change occurs prior to maturity,
the conversion rate will increase by an additional amount of up
to $8.27 per share, for a holder that elects to convert its
Convertible Senior Notes in connection with such fundamental
change, which amount will be paid entirely in cash. A
fundamental change is any transaction or event (whether by means
of an exchange offer, liquidation, tender offer, consolidation,
merger, combination, reclassification, recapitalization or
otherwise) in which more than 50% of our common stock is
exchanged for, converted into, acquired for or constitutes
solely the right to receive, consideration. No fundamental
change will have occurred if at least 90% of the consideration
received consists of shares of common stock, or depositary
receipts representing such shares, that are:
|
|
|
|
|
Listed on, or immediately after the transaction or event will be
listed on, a United States national securities exchange; or
|
|
|
Approved, or immediately after the transaction or event will be
approved, for quotation on a United States system of automated
dissemination of quotations of securities prices similar to the
NASDAQ National Market prior to its designation as a national
securities exchange.
|
37
As of June 28, 2008, none of the conditions allowing the
holders of the Convertible Senior Notes to convert had been met.
Interest on the Convertible Senior Notes began accruing in
December 2006 and is payable semi-annually each
December 15th and June 15th.
Concurrently with the issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes,
we entered into hedge transactions with various parties whereby
we have the option to purchase up to 23.6 million shares of
our common stock at a price of $21.15 per share, subject to
adjustment. These options expire on December 15, 2011, in
the case of the 2011 Notes, and December 15, 2013, in the
case of the 2013 Notes, and must be settled in net shares. The
aggregate cost of these hedge transactions was
$119.8 million and has been recorded as a reduction to
Stockholders equity in accordance with EITF
No. 00-19,
Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed
to, and Potentially Settled in, a Companys Own
Stock. The estimated fair value of the hedges acquired in
connection with the issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes was
$29.4 million as of June 28, 2008. Subsequent changes
in the fair value of these hedges will not be recognized as long
as the instruments remain classified as equity.
In separate transactions, we also sold warrants to various
parties for the purchase of up to 23.6 million shares of
our common stock at a price of $31.50 per share in a private
placement pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.
The warrants expire on various dates from February 2012 through
April 2012 in the case of the 2011 Notes, and February 2014
through April 2014 in the case of the 2013 Notes, and must be
settled in net shares. We received $39.4 million in cash
proceeds from the sale of these warrants, which has been
recorded as a reduction to Stockholders equity in
accordance with EITF
No. 00-19.
The estimated fair value of the warrants sold in connection with
the issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes was
$12.7 million as of June 28, 2008. Subsequent changes
in the fair value of these warrants will not be recognized as
long as the instruments remain classified as equity. The
warrants will be included in diluted earnings per share, or EPS,
to the extent the impact is dilutive.
Zero Coupon Zero Yield Senior Convertible Notes Due 2023
In August 2003, we issued $420.0 million principal amount
of our 2023 Notes to two initial purchasers in a private
placement pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
for resale to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to
Rule 144A of the Securities Act. We received net proceeds
of $406.4 million after transaction fees of
$13.6 million that were recorded in Other long-term assets
and are being amortized to interest expense using the
straight-line method over five years, which is the duration of
the first redemption period. The 2023 Notes were issued by us at
par and bear no interest. The 2023 Notes are convertible into
our common stock initially at a conversion price of $15.65 per
share, which would result in an aggregate of 26.8 million
shares issued upon conversion, subject to adjustment upon the
occurrence of specified events. In connection with the issuance
of the Convertible Senior Notes in December 2006, we repurchased
$189.6 million principal amount of the 2023 Notes, reducing
the aggregate number of shares to be issued upon conversion to
14.7 million.
We may redeem for cash all or any part of the 2023 Notes on or
after August 15, 2008 for 100.00% of the principal amount,
except for the 2023 Notes that the holders require us to
repurchase on the repurchase dates described below. The holders
of the 2023 Notes may require us to repurchase for cash all or
any portion of their 2023 Notes on August 15, 2008 for
100.25% of the principal amount, on August 15, 2013 for
100.00% of the principal amount or on August 15, 2018 for
100.00% of the principal amount, by providing to the paying
agent a written repurchase notice. On July 16, 2008, we
filed a Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO with the SEC
and made available to the holders of the 2023 Notes, through the
Depository Trust Company, documents specifying the terms,
conditions and procedures for requiring us to repurchase all or
a portion of the 2023 Notes on August 15, 2008 for 100.25%
of the principal amount. Because the holders of the 2023 Notes
can require us to repurchase for cash all or any portion of the
2023 Notes on August 15, 2008, the 2023 Notes are
classified as a Current liability in our Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of June 28, 2008 and December 29,
2007.
Each $1,000 of principal of the 2023 Notes will initially be
convertible into 63.8790 shares of our common stock,
subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of specified events.
Holders of the 2023 Notes may convert their 2023 Notes prior to
maturity only if:
|
|
|
|
|
The price of our common stock reaches $22.69 during certain
periods of time specified in the 2023 Notes;
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
Specified corporate transactions occur;
|
|
|
The 2023 Notes have been called for redemption; or
|
|
|
The trading price of the 2023 Notes falls below a certain
threshold.
|
In the event of a fundamental change in our corporate ownership
or structure, the holders may require us to repurchase all or
any portion of their 2023 Notes for 100.00% of the principal
amount. Upon a fundamental change in our corporate ownership or
structure, in certain circumstances we may choose to pay the
repurchase price in cash, shares of our common stock or a
combination of cash and shares of our common stock. As of
June 28, 2008, none of the conditions allowing the holders
of the 2023 Notes to convert had been met.
In connection with the issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes
in December 2006, a portion of the proceeds were used to
purchase in the open market 2023 Notes with a principal balance
of $189.6 million for a total purchase price of
$228.5 million. In connection with this purchase, we
incurred expenses of $40.8 million for the early
extinguishment of debt. The loss on early extinguishment of debt
included the call premium on the purchased 2023 Notes and the
write-off of a portion of the unamortized deferred debt issuance
costs.
Concurrently with the issuance of the 2023 Notes, we entered
into hedge transactions with a financial institution whereby we
originally acquired options to purchase up to 26.8 million
shares of our common stock at a price of $15.65 per share. These
options expire on August 15, 2008 and must be settled in
net shares. The cost of the hedge transactions to us was
$134.6 million. In connection with the purchase of a
portion of the 2023 Notes in December 2006, we also sold
12.1 million of the hedges that were originally purchased
in connection with the 2023 Notes and received proceeds of
$55.9 million.
In addition, we sold warrants for our common stock to a
financial institution for the purchase of up to
26.8 million shares of our common stock at a price of
$23.08 per share. All of the warrants expired out of the money
on various dates from February 2008 through May 2008 and no
settlement was required. We received $56.4 million in cash
proceeds from the sale of these warrants. In connection with the
purchase of a portion of the 2023 Notes in December 2006, we
also purchased 12.1 million of the warrants for our common
stock that were originally issued in connection with the 2023
Notes at a cost of $10.2 million.
As of June 28, 2008, the estimated fair value of the
remaining hedges acquired in connection with the issuance of the
2023 Notes was zero. Subsequent changes in the fair value of
these hedge transactions will not be recognized as long as the
instruments remain classified as equity.
For further information about our 2023 Notes, including
conversion rights and the effect of a fundamental change, see
the discussion under the heading Liquidity and Capital
Resources Other Factors Affecting Liquidity and
Capital Resources in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007.
New
Accounting Standards
In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position, or FSP, APB
14-1,
Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be
Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash
Settlement), which will require us to recognize additional
non-cash interest expense related to our Convertible Senior
Notes in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
FSP APB 14-1
is effective for fiscal 2009 and is required to be applied
retrospectively for all periods for which our Convertible Senior
Notes were outstanding prior to the date of adoption. FSP APB
14-1 will
have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial
condition, particularly with respect to interest expense ratios
commonly referred to by lenders, and could potentially hinder
our ability to raise capital through the issuance of debt or
equity securities.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R,
Business Combinations and SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements, an amendment of Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51. SFAS No. 141R will
change how business acquisitions are accounted for and will
impact financial statements both on the acquisition date and in
subsequent periods. SFAS No. 160 will change the
accounting and reporting for minority interests, which will be
recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a
component of equity. SFAS No. 141R and
SFAS No. 160 are effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is not permitted.
We are currently evaluating the impact that
SFAS No. 141R and SFAS No. 160 will have on
our condensed consolidated financial statements.
39
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
Disclosures
About Market Risk
Interest
Rate Risk
Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates
relates primarily to our portfolio of Cash and cash equivalents.
While we are exposed to interest rate fluctuations in many of
the worlds leading industrialized countries, our interest
income and expense is most sensitive to fluctuations in the
general level of United States interest rates. In this regard,
changes in United States interest rates affect the interest
earned on our Cash and cash equivalents and costs associated
with foreign currency hedges.
We invest in high quality credit issuers and, by policy, limit
the amount of our credit exposure to any one issuer. As part of
our policy, our first priority is to reduce the risk of
principal loss. Consequently, we seek to preserve our invested
funds by limiting default risk, market risk and reinvestment
risk. We mitigate default risk by investing in only high quality
credit securities that we believe to have low credit risk and by
positioning our portfolio to respond appropriately to a
significant reduction in a credit rating of any investment
issuer or guarantor. The short-term interest-bearing portfolio
of Cash and cash equivalents includes only marketable securities
with active secondary or resale markets to ensure portfolio
liquidity.
All highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or
less at the date of purchase are considered to be cash
equivalents. Investments with maturities greater than three
months are classified as available-for-sale and are considered
to be short-term investments. The carrying value of our
interest-bearing instruments approximated fair value as of
June 28, 2008. The following table presents the carrying
value and related weighted average interest rates for our
interest-bearing instruments, which are all classified as Cash
and cash equivalents on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
as of June 28, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents variable rate
|
|
$
|
695.5
|
|
|
|
2.61%
|
|
Cash variable rate
|
|
|
83.5
|
|
|
|
0.85%
|
|
Cash fixed rate
|
|
|
35.3
|
|
|
|
1.67%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing instruments
|
|
$
|
814.3
|
|
|
|
2.39%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
Currency Risk
Most of our revenue and material business activity are
transacted in the United States dollar. However, certain of our
operations include transactions in foreign currencies and,
therefore, we benefit from a weaker dollar, and in certain
countries where we invoice customers in the local currency, we
are adversely affected by a stronger dollar relative to major
currencies worldwide. The primary effect of foreign currency
transactions on our results of operations from a weakening
United States dollar is an increase in revenue offset by a
smaller increase in expenses. Conversely, the primary effect of
foreign currency transactions on our results of operations from
a strengthening United States dollar is a reduction in revenue
offset by a smaller reduction in expenses.
We enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts with
financial institutions to protect against currency exchange
risks associated with existing assets and liabilities. A foreign
currency forward exchange contract acts as a hedge by increasing
in value when underlying assets decrease in value or underlying
liabilities increase in value due to changes in foreign exchange
rates. Conversely, a foreign currency forward exchange contract
decreases in value when underlying assets increase in value or
underlying liabilities decrease in value due to changes in
foreign exchange rates. These forward contracts are not
designated as accounting hedges under SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, and, therefore, the unrealized gains and
losses are recognized in Other income (expense), net, in advance
of the actual foreign currency cash flows with the fair value of
these forward contracts being recorded as accrued liabilities or
other current assets.
40
Our policy governing hedges of foreign currency risk does not
allow us to use forward contracts for trading purposes. Our
forward contracts generally have maturities of 90 days or
less. The effectiveness of our hedging program depends on our
ability to estimate future asset and liability exposures. We
enter into currency forward exchange contracts based on
estimated future asset and liability exposures. Recognized gains
and losses with respect to our current hedging activities will
ultimately depend on how accurately we are able to match the
amount of currency forward exchange contracts with actual
underlying asset and liability exposures.
The following table provides information, as of June 28,
2008, about our forward foreign currency contracts. The
information is provided in United States dollar equivalent
amounts. The table presents the notional amounts, at contract
exchange rates, and the weighted average contractual foreign
currency exchange rates expressed as units of the foreign
currency per United States dollar, which in some cases may not
be the market convention for quoting a particular currency. All
of these forward contracts mature prior to or during August 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward Contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japanese yen
|
|
$
|
43.5
|
|
|
|
105.58
|
|
British pound sterling
|
|
|
24.1
|
|
|
|
0.51
|
|
European union euro
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
0.65
|
|
Israeli shekel
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
3.39
|
|
Indian rupee
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
43.20
|
|
Taiwan dollar
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
30.35
|
|
Other
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
123.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated fair value
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While we actively monitor our foreign currency risks, there can
be no assurance that our foreign currency hedging activities
will substantially offset the impact of fluctuations in currency
exchange rates on our results of operations, cash flows and
financial position.
Equity
Price Risk
1.375% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2011 and
1.500% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2013
In December 2006, we issued $250.0 million principal amount
of our 2011 Notes, and $250.0 million principal amount of
our 2013 Notes, or collectively, the Convertible Senior Notes,
to three initial purchasers in a private placement pursuant to
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for resale to qualified
institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A of the
Securities Act. Concurrently with the issuance of the
Convertible Senior Notes, we entered into hedge transactions
with various parties, and in separate transactions, sold
warrants for the purchase of our common stock to various parties
to reduce the potential dilution from the conversion of the
Convertible Senior Notes and to mitigate any negative effect
such conversion may have on the price of our common stock. For
additional description of the Convertible Senior Notes,
including the hedge and warrants transactions, see the
discussion under the heading Liquidity and Capital
Resources Other Factors Affecting Liquidity and
Capital Resources above.
Zero Coupon Zero Yield Senior Convertible Notes Due 2023
In August 2003, we issued $420.0 million principal amount
of our 2023 Notes to two initial purchasers in a private
placement pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
for resale to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to
Rule 144A of the Securities Act. Concurrently with the
issuance of the 2023 Notes, we entered into hedge transactions
with one of the initial purchasers and in a separate
transaction, sold warrants for the purchase of our
41
common stock to one of the initial purchasers to reduce the
potential dilution from the conversion of the 2023 Notes and to
mitigate any negative effect such conversion may have on the
price of our common stock. For additional description of the
2023 Notes, including the hedge and warrants transactions, see
the discussion under the heading Liquidity and Capital
Resources Other Factors Affecting Liquidity and
Capital Resources above.
Investments
We have a portfolio of equity investments that includes
marketable equity securities and non-marketable equity
securities. Our equity investments are made primarily in
connection with our strategic investment program. Under our
strategic investment program, from time to time, we make cash
investments in companies with technologies that are potentially
strategically important to us.
We consider all of our investments in marketable securities as
available-for-sale. It is our policy to review the fair value of
these marketable securities on a regular basis to determine
whether our investments in these companies are
other-than-temporarily impaired. This evaluation includes, but
is not limited to, reviewing each companys cash position,
financing needs, earnings or revenue outlook, operational
performance, management or ownership changes and competition. If
we believe the carrying value of an investment is in excess of
its fair value, and this difference is other-than-temporary, it
is our policy to write down the investment to reduce its
carrying value to fair value.
The fair value of our portfolio of available-for-sale marketable
equity securities, which are included in Short-term investments
on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, was
$52.5 million as of June 28, 2008 and
$14.9 million as of December 29, 2007. While we
actively monitor these investments, we do not currently engage
in any hedging activities to reduce or eliminate equity price
risk with respect to these equity investments. Accordingly, we
could lose all or part of our investment portfolio of marketable
equity securities if there is an adverse change in the market
prices of the companies we invest in.
Our investments in marketable and non-marketable equity
securities would be negatively affected by an adverse change in
equity market prices, although the impact on our investments in
non-marketable securities cannot be directly quantified. Such a
change, or any negative change in the financial performance or
prospects of the companies whose non-marketable securities we
own, would harm the ability of these companies to raise
additional capital and the likelihood of our being able to
realize any gains or return of our investments through liquidity
events such as initial public offerings, acquisitions and
private sales. These types of investments involve a high degree
of risk, and there can be no assurance that any company we
invest in will grow or will be successful or that we will be
able to liquidate a particular investment when desired.
Accordingly, we could lose all or part of our investment.
Our investments in non-marketable equity securities had a
carrying amount of $21.7 million as of June 28, 2008
and $26.2 million as of December 29, 2007. If we
determine that an other-than-temporary decline in fair value
exists for a non-marketable equity security, we write down the
investment to its fair value and record the related write-down
as an investment loss in our Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Operations.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation required by
Rule 13a-15
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, under the supervision and with the participation
of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer, or
CEO, and the Chief Financial Officer, or CFO, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act) as of June 28, 2008.
The evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures
included a review of our processes and implementation and the
effect on the information generated for use in this Quarterly
Report. In the course of this evaluation, we sought to identify
any material weaknesses in our disclosure controls and
procedures, to determine whether we had identified any acts of
fraud involving personnel who have a significant role in our
disclosure controls and procedures, and to confirm that any
necessary corrective action, including process improvements, was
taken. This type of evaluation is done every fiscal quarter so
that our conclusions concerning the effectiveness of these
controls
42
can be reported in our periodic reports filed with the SEC. The
overall goals of these evaluation activities are to monitor our
disclosure controls and procedures and to make modifications as
necessary. We intend to maintain these disclosure controls and
procedures, modifying them as circumstances warrant.
Based on their evaluation as of June 28, 2008, our CEO and
CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective to ensure that the information required to be
disclosed by us in our reports filed or submitted under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and
forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting during the quarter ended June 28, 2008 that
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Inherent
Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that
our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control
over financial reporting will prevent or detect all error and
all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and
operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance
that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the
design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are
resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be
considered relative to their costs. While our disclosure
controls and procedures and internal control over financial
reporting are designed to provide reasonable assurance of their
effectiveness, because of the inherent limitations in all
control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute
assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if
any, within Cadence have been detected.
43
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
From time to time, we are involved in various disputes and
litigation matters that arise in the ordinary course of
business. These include disputes and lawsuits related to
intellectual property, mergers and acquisitions, licensing,
contracts, distribution arrangements and employee relations
matters. At least quarterly, we review the status of each
significant matter and assess its potential financial exposure.
If the potential loss from any claim or legal proceeding is
considered probable and the amount or the range of loss can be
estimated, we accrue a liability for the estimated loss in
accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies. Legal proceedings are subject to
uncertainties, and the outcomes are difficult to predict.
Because of such uncertainties, accruals are based only on the
best information available at the time. As additional
information becomes available, we reassess the potential
liability related to pending claims and litigation matters and
may revise estimates.
On May 30, 2007, Ahmed Higazi, a former employee, filed
suit against us in the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California alleging that we improperly
classified him and a class of our other information technology
employees as exempt from overtime pay. The suit alleges claims
for unpaid overtime under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act
and California law, waiting-time penalties under the California
Labor Code, failure to provide proper earnings statements under
California law, failure to provide meal periods and rest breaks
as required by California law, unfair business practices under
California Business & Professions Code
section 17200, and unpaid 401(k) Plan contributions in
violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. On
June 20, 2007, we answered the plaintiffs complaint,
denying its material allegations and raising a number of
affirmative defenses, and on December 19, 2007, we filed an
amended answer. A period of discovery conducted by both sides
then ensued, and was followed in January 2008 by a private
mediation of the case. At the mediation, the parties were
successful in resolving their respective differences, and
entered into a settlement agreement without contesting the
merits of the claims or admitting liability. On July 7,
2008, the court approved the settlement agreement and we paid
the settlement amount shortly thereafter.
While the outcome of disputes and litigation matters cannot be
predicted with any certainty, management does not believe that
the outcome of any current matters will have a material adverse
effect on our consolidated financial position, liquidity or
results of operations.
44
Our business faces many risks. Described below are what we
believe to be the material risks that we face. If any of the
events or circumstances described in the following risks
actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of
operations could suffer. The descriptions below include any
material changes to and supersede the description of the risk
factors as previously disclosed in Item 1A to Part I
of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007, filed with the
SEC on February 26, 2008.
Risks
Related to Our Business
We are subject to the cyclical nature of the integrated
circuit and electronics systems industries, and any downturn in
these industries may reduce our revenue.
Purchases of our products and services are dependent upon the
commencement of new design projects by IC manufacturers and
electronics systems companies. The IC and electronics systems
industries are cyclical and are characterized by constant and
rapid technological change, rapid product obsolescence and price
erosion, evolving standards, short product life cycles and wide
fluctuations in product supply and demand.
The IC and electronics systems industries have experienced
significant downturns, often connected with, or in anticipation
of, maturing product cycles of both these industries and
their customers products and a decline in general economic
conditions. These downturns have been characterized by
diminished product demand, production overcapacity, high
inventory levels and accelerated erosion of average selling
prices. Any economic downturn in the industries we serve could
harm our business, operating results or financial condition.
Our failure to respond quickly to technological
developments could make our products uncompetitive and
obsolete.
The industries in which we compete experience rapid technology
developments, changes in industry standards, changes in customer
requirements and frequent new product introductions and
improvements. Currently, the industries we serve are
experiencing several revolutionary trends:
|
|
|
|
|
Migration to nanometer design: the size of features such as
wires, transistors and contacts on ICs continuously shrink due
to the ongoing advances in semiconductor manufacturing
processes. Process feature sizes refer to the width of the
transistors and the width and spacing of interconnect on the IC.
Feature size is normally identified by the transistor length,
which is shrinking rapidly to 65 nanometers and smaller. This is
commonly referred to in the semiconductor industry as the
migration to nanometer design. It represents a major challenge
for participants in the semiconductor industry, from IC design
and design automation to design of manufacturing equipment and
the manufacturing process itself. Shrinkage of transistor length
to such proportions is challenging the industry in the
application of more complex physics and chemistry that is needed
to realize advanced silicon devices. For EDA tools, models of
each components electrical properties and behavior become
more complex as do requisite analysis, design and verification
capabilities. Novel design tools and methodologies must be
invented quickly to remain competitive in the design of
electronics in the smallest nanometer ranges.
|
|
|
The challenges of nanometer design are leading some customers to
work with older, less risky manufacturing processes. This may
reduce their need to upgrade and/or proliferate their EDA
products and design flows.
|
|
|
The ability to design SoCs, increases the complexity of managing
a design that, at the lowest level, is represented by billions
of shapes on the fabrication mask. In addition, SoCs typically
incorporate microprocessors and digital signal processors that
are programmed with software, requiring simultaneous design of
the IC and the related software embedded on the IC.
|
|
|
With the availability of seemingly endless gate capacity, there
is an increase in design reuse, or the combining of
off-the-shelf design IP with custom logic to create ICs. The
unavailability of high-quality design IP that can be reliably
incorporated into a customers design with our IC
implementation products and services could reduce demand for our
products and services.
|
|
|
Increased technological capability of the Field-Programmable
Gate Array, which is a programmable logic chip, creates an
alternative to IC implementation for some electronics companies.
This could reduce demand for our IC implementation products and
services.
|
|
|
A growing number of low-cost design and methodology services
businesses could reduce the need for some IC companies to invest
in EDA products.
|
45
If we are unable to respond quickly and successfully to these
developments, we may lose our competitive position, and our
products or technologies may become uncompetitive or obsolete.
To compete successfully, we must develop or acquire new products
and improve our existing products and processes on a schedule
that keeps pace with technological developments and the
requirements for products addressing a broad spectrum of
designers and designer expertise in our industries. We must also
be able to support a range of changing computer software,
hardware platforms and customer preferences. We cannot guarantee
that we will be successful in this effort.
We have experienced varied operating results, and our
operating results for any particular fiscal period are affected
by the timing of significant orders for our software products,
fluctuations in customer preferences for license types and the
timing of revenue recognition under those license types.
We have experienced, and may continue to experience, varied
operating results. In particular, we experienced a net loss for
the three months ended March 29, 2008 and the six months
ended June 28, 2008, we have experienced net losses for
some other past periods and we may experience net losses in
future periods. Various factors affect our operating results and
some of them are not within our control. Our operating results
for any period are affected by the timing of significant orders
for our software products because a significant number of
licenses for our software products are in excess of
$5.0 million.
Our operating results are also affected by the mix of license
types executed in any given period. We license software using
three different license types: subscription, term and perpetual.
Product revenue associated with term and perpetual licenses is
generally recognized at the beginning of the license period,
whereas product revenue associated with subscription licenses is
recognized over multiple periods during the term of the license.
Revenue may also be deferred under term and perpetual licenses
until payments become due and payable from customers with
nonlinear payment terms or as cash is collected from customers
with lower credit ratings. In addition, revenue is impacted by
the timing of license renewals, the extent to which contracts
contain flexible payment terms, changes in existing contractual
arrangements with customers and the mix of license types (i.e.,
perpetual, term or subscription) for existing customers, which
changes could have the effect of accelerating or delaying the
recognition of revenue from the timing of recognition under the
original contract.
We plan operating expense levels primarily based on forecasted
revenue levels. These expenses and the impact of long-term
commitments are relatively fixed in the short term. A shortfall
in revenue could lead to operating results below expectations
because we may not be able to quickly reduce these fixed
expenses in response to these short-term business changes.
The majority of our contracts are executed in the final two
weeks of a fiscal quarter. This makes it difficult to determine
with accuracy how much business will be executed in each fiscal
quarter. Due to the volume or complexity of transactions that we
review at the very end of the quarter, or due to operational
matters regarding particular agreements, we may not finish
processing or ship products under some contracts that have been
signed during that fiscal quarter, which means that the
associated revenue cannot be recognized in that particular
period.
You should not view our historical results of operations as
reliable indicators of our future performance. If revenue,
operating results or our business outlook for future periods
fall short of the levels expected by public market analysts or
investors, the trading price of our common stock could decline.
Our future revenue is dependent in part upon our installed
customer base continuing to license or buy additional products,
renew maintenance agreements and purchase additional
services.
Our installed customer base has traditionally generated
additional new license, service and maintenance revenues. In
future periods, customers may not necessarily license or buy
additional products or contract for additional services or
maintenance. Maintenance is generally renewable annually at a
customers option, and there are no mandatory payment
obligations or obligations to license additional software. If
our customers decide not to renew their maintenance agreements
or license additional products or contract for additional
services, or if they reduce the scope of the maintenance
agreements, our revenue could decrease, which could have an
adverse effect on our results of operations. Our customers,
which include the largest semiconductor companies in the world,
often have significant bargaining power in negotiations with us.
Mergers of our customers can reduce the total level of purchases
of our software and services, and in some cases, increase
customers bargaining power in negotiations with their
suppliers, including us.
46
We may not receive significant revenue from our current
research and development efforts for several years, if at
all.
Internally developing software products, integrating acquired
software products and integrating intellectual property into
existing platforms is expensive, and these investments often
require a long time to generate returns. Our strategy involves
significant investments in software research and development and
related product opportunities. We believe that we must continue
to dedicate a significant amount of resources to our research
and development efforts to maintain our competitive position.
However, we cannot predict that we will receive significant, if
any, revenue from these investments.
Our failure to attract, train, motivate and retain key
employees may make us less competitive in our industries and
therefore harm our results of operations.
Our business depends on the efforts and abilities of our
employees. The high cost of training new employees, not fully
utilizing these employees, or losing trained employees to
competing employers could reduce our gross margins and harm our
business or operating results. Competition for highly skilled
employees can be intense, particularly in geographic areas
recognized as high technology centers such as the Silicon Valley
area, where our principal offices are located, and the other
locations where we maintain facilities. To attract, retain and
motivate individuals with the requisite expertise, we may be
required to grant large numbers of stock options or other
stock-based incentive awards, which may be dilutive to existing
stockholders and increase compensation expense. We may also be
required to pay key employees significant base salaries and cash
bonuses, which could harm our operating results.
In addition, the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules require stockholder
approval for new equity compensation plans and significant
amendments to existing plans, including increases in shares
available for issuance under such plans, and prohibit NASDAQ
member organizations from giving a proxy to vote on equity
compensation plans unless the beneficial owner of the shares has
given voting instructions. These regulations could make it more
difficult for us to grant equity compensation to employees in
the future. To the extent that these regulations make it more
difficult or expensive to grant equity compensation to
employees, we may incur increased compensation costs or find it
difficult to attract, retain and motivate employees, which could
materially and adversely affect our business.
We have acquired and expect to acquire other companies and
businesses and may not realize the expected benefits of these
acquisitions, including the proposed acquisition of Mentor
Graphics.
We have acquired and expect to acquire other companies and
businesses in the future. While we expect to carefully analyze
each potential acquisition before committing to the transaction,
we may not be able to integrate and manage acquired products and
businesses effectively. In addition, acquisitions involve a
number of risks. If any of the following events occurs after we
acquire another business, it could seriously harm our business,
operating results or financial condition:
|
|
|
|
|
Difficulties in combining previously separate businesses into a
single unit;
|
|
|
The substantial diversion of managements attention from
day-to-day business when evaluating and negotiating these
transactions and integrating an acquired business;
|
|
|
The discovery, after completion of the acquisition, of
liabilities assumed from the acquired business or of assets
acquired for which we cannot realize the anticipated value;
|
|
|
The failure to realize anticipated benefits such as cost savings
and revenue enhancements;
|
|
|
The failure to retain key employees of the acquired business;
|
|
|
Difficulties related to integrating the products of an acquired
business in, for example, distribution, engineering and customer
support areas;
|
|
|
Unanticipated costs;
|
|
|
Exposure to undisclosed or unknown potential liabilities of an
acquired business;
|
|
|
Customer dissatisfaction with existing license agreements with
us which may dissuade them from licensing or buying products
acquired by us after the effective date of the license; and
|
|
|
The failure to understand and compete effectively in markets in
which we have limited experience.
|
47
In a number of our previously completed acquisitions, we have
agreed to make future payments, either in the form of employee
bonuses or contingent purchase price payments, or earnouts,
based on the performance of the acquired businesses or the
employees who joined us with the acquired businesses. The
performance goals pursuant to which these future payments may be
made generally relate to achievement by the acquired business or
the employees who joined us with the acquired business of
certain specified bookings, revenue, product proliferation,
product development or employee retention goals during a
specified period following completion of the applicable
acquisition. Future acquisitions may involve issuances of stock
as full or partial payment of the purchase price for the
acquired business, grants of incentive stock or options to
employees of the acquired businesses (which may be dilutive to
existing stockholders), expenditure of substantial cash
resources or the incurrence of material amounts of debt.
The specific performance goal levels and amounts and timing of
employee bonuses or contingent purchase price payments vary with
each acquisition. In connection with our acquisitions completed
prior to June 28, 2008, we may be obligated to pay up to an
aggregate of $62.4 million in cash during the next
50 months if certain performance goals related to one or
more of the criteria mentioned above are achieved in full. Of
this amount, up to $51.4 million would be expensed as
compensation expense in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations and up to $11.0 million would be added to the
purchase price of the acquisitions and will be recorded in
Goodwill in our Condensed Balance Sheets.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, which
will change how business acquisitions are accounted for and will
impact financial statements both on the acquisition date and in
subsequent periods. SFAS No. 141R is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Early
adoption is not permitted. We are currently evaluating the
impact that SFAS No. 141R will have on our condensed
consolidated financial statements.
On May 2, 2008, we made a proposal to the board of
directors of Mentor Graphics to acquire all of the outstanding
shares of Mentor Graphics common stock for cash consideration of
$16.00 per Mentor Graphics share, representing a total value of
approximately $1.6 billion. On May 23, 2008, the
Mentor Graphics board of directors informed us that it did not
wish to pursue discussions with us given Mentor Graphics
desire to stay independent. On June 17, 2008, we publicly
announced our offer and Mentor Graphics publicly confirmed that
it received an unsolicited offer from us and that it previously
rejected our offer. We currently expect to borrow in excess of
$1.0 billion if we are successful in acquiring all of
Mentor Graphics outstanding shares and we are currently
reviewing various alternatives for financing this transaction.
There are no assurances that the acquisition will be completed
or that financing will be available on terms that are acceptable
to us. If we were to acquire Mentor Graphics, the transaction
would have a material impact on our business, operating results
or financial condition, which impact could be negative.
The announcement regarding our proposal to acquire Mentor
Graphics has made us subject to a number of risks, uncertainties
and other factors, many of which are outside our control,
including, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
The possibility that the transaction will not be consummated;
|
|
|
The effect of the announcement of the proposal on our business,
including our strategic and customer relationships, ability to
retain key employees and stock prices;
|
|
|
The possibility that the announcement of the proposal may result
in delays in customers purchases of products and services;
|
|
|
The possibility that the announcement of the proposal may result
in changes in the mix of license types (i.e. perpetual, term or
subscription) for existing customers, which changes could have
the effect of delaying the recognition of revenue when compared
with our or Mentor Graphics existing license mix;
|
|
|
Our ability to successfully integrate Mentor Graphics into a
combined company and otherwise realize within anticipated time
periods the potential benefits of the acquisition, including any
potential synergies we may anticipate from the transaction;
|
|
|
Our ability to access capital and debt markets to finance the
acquisition on favorable or acceptable terms;
|
|
|
That Cadence will incur significant deal related cost and
expenses in connection with the Mentor Graphics proposed
acquisition, even if the acquisition is not consummated. The
timing and effect of the recognition of such deal costs and
expenses will depend on whether a transaction is consummated
before
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
fiscal year 2009, when SFAS No. 141R becomes effective, and
if no transaction is to be consummated, the timing of when that
becomes clear; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
The value of any investment we may have in Mentor Graphics
securities in advance of the transaction may decline if the
transaction is not completed and Mentor Graphics share
price declines.
|
The competition in our industries is substantial and we
may not be able to continue to successfully compete in our
industries.
The EDA market and the commercial electronics design and
methodology services industries are highly competitive. If we
fail to compete successfully in these industries, it could
seriously harm our business, operating results or financial
condition. To compete in these industries, we must identify and
develop or acquire innovative and cost-competitive EDA products,
integrate them into platforms and market them in a timely
manner. We must also gain industry acceptance for our design and
methodology services and offer better strategic concepts,
technical solutions, prices and response time, or a combination
of these factors, than those of other design companies and the
internal design departments of electronics manufacturers. We
cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully
in these industries. Factors that could affect our ability to
succeed include:
|
|
|
|
|
The development by others of competitive EDA products or
platforms and design and methodology services, which could
result in a shift of customer preferences away from our products
and services and significantly decrease revenue;
|
|
|
Decisions by electronics manufacturers to perform design and
methodology services internally, rather than purchase these
services from outside vendors due to budget constraints or
excess engineering capacity;
|
|
|
The challenges of developing (or acquiring externally-developed)
technology solutions that are adequate and competitive in
meeting the requirements of next-generation design challenges;
|
|
|
The significant number of current and potential competitors in
the EDA industry and the low cost of entry;
|
|
|
Intense competition to attract acquisition targets, which may
make it more difficult for us to acquire companies or
technologies at an acceptable price or at all; and
|
|
|
The combination of or collaboration among many EDA companies to
deliver more comprehensive offerings than they could
individually.
|
We compete in the EDA products market with Synopsys, Inc., Magma
Design Automation, Inc. and Mentor Graphics. We also compete
with numerous smaller EDA companies, with manufacturers of
electronic devices that have developed or have the capability to
develop their own EDA products, and with numerous electronics
design and consulting companies. Manufacturers of electronic
devices may be reluctant to purchase design and methodology
services from independent vendors such as us because they wish
to promote their own internal design departments.
We may need to change our pricing models to compete
successfully.
The highly competitive markets in which we compete can put
pressure on us to reduce the prices of our products. If our
competitors offer deep discounts on certain products in an
effort to recapture or gain market segment share or to sell
other software or hardware products, we may then need to lower
our prices or offer other favorable terms to compete
successfully. Any such changes would be likely to reduce our
profit margins and could adversely affect our operating results.
Any substantial changes to our prices and pricing policies could
cause sales and software license revenues to decline or be
delayed as our sales force implements and our customers adjust
to the new pricing policies. Some of our competitors may bundle
products for promotional purposes or as a long-term pricing
strategy or provide guarantees of prices and product
implementations. These practices could, over time, significantly
constrain the prices that we can charge for our products. If we
cannot offset price reductions with a corresponding increase in
the number of sales or with lower spending, then the reduced
license revenues resulting from lower prices could have an
adverse effect on our results of operations.
49
We rely on our proprietary technology as well as software
and other intellectual property rights licensed to us by third
parties, and we cannot assure you that the precautions taken to
protect our rights will be adequate or that we will continue to
be able to adequately secure such intellectual property rights
from third parties.
Our success depends, in part, upon our proprietary technology.
We generally rely on patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade
secret laws, licenses and restrictive agreements to establish
and protect our proprietary rights in technology and products.
Despite precautions we may take to protect our intellectual
property, third parties have tried in the past, and may try in
the future, to challenge, invalidate or circumvent these
safeguards. The rights granted under our patents or attendant to
our other intellectual property may not provide us with any
competitive advantages and there is no guarantee that patents
will be issued on any of our pending applications and future
patents may not be sufficiently broad to protect our technology.
Furthermore, the laws of foreign countries may not protect our
proprietary rights in those countries to the same extent as
applicable law protects these rights in the United States. Many
of our products include software or other intellectual property
licensed from third parties. We may have to seek new or renew
existing licenses for such software and other intellectual
property in the future. Our design and methodology services
business holds licenses to certain software and other
intellectual property owned by third parties, including that of
our competitors. Our failure to obtain, for our use, software or
other intellectual property licenses or other intellectual
property rights on favorable terms, or the need to engage in
litigation over these licenses or rights, could seriously harm
our business, operating results or financial condition.
We could lose key technology or suffer serious harm to our
business because of the infringement of our intellectual
property rights by third parties or because of our infringement
of the intellectual property rights of third parties.
There are numerous patents in the EDA industry and new patents
are being issued at a rapid rate. It is not always practicable
to determine in advance whether a product or any of its
components infringes the patent rights of others. As a result,
from time to time, we may be compelled to respond to or
prosecute intellectual property infringement claims to protect
our rights or defend a customers rights.
Intellectual property infringement claims, regardless of merit,
could consume valuable management time, result in costly
litigation, or cause product shipment delays, all of which could
seriously harm our business, operating results or financial
condition. In settling these claims, we may be required to enter
into royalty or licensing agreements with the third parties
claiming infringement. These royalty or licensing agreements, if
available, may not have terms favorable to us. Being compelled
to enter into a license agreement with unfavorable terms could
seriously harm our business, operating results or financial
condition. Any potential intellectual property litigation could
compel us to do one or more of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Pay damages (including the potential for treble damages),
license fees or royalties (including royalties for past periods)
to the party claiming infringement;
|
|
|
Stop licensing products or providing services that use the
challenged intellectual property;
|
|
|
Obtain a license from the owner of the infringed intellectual
property to sell or use the relevant technology, which license
may not be available on reasonable terms, or at all; or
|
|
|
Redesign the challenged technology, which could be
time-consuming and costly, or not be accomplished.
|
If we were compelled to take any of these actions, our business
or results of operations may suffer.
If our security measures are breached and an unauthorized
party obtains access to customer data, our information systems
may be perceived as being unsecure and customers may curtail or
stop their use of our products and services.
Our products and services involve the storage and transmission
of customers proprietary information, and breaches of our
security measures could expose us to a risk of loss or misuse of
this information, litigation and potential liability. Because
techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage
information systems change frequently and generally are not
recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to
anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventive
measures. If an actual or perceived breach of our security
occurs, the market perception of the effectiveness of our
security measures could be harmed and we could lose existing
customers and our ability to obtain new customers.
50
We may not be able to effectively implement our
restructuring activities, and our restructuring activities may
not result in the expected benefits, which would negatively
impact our future results of operations.
The EDA market and the commercial electronics design and
methodology services industries are highly competitive and
change quickly. We have responded to increased competition and
changes in the industries in which we compete, in part, by
restructuring our operations and at times reducing the size of
our workforce. Despite our restructuring efforts in prior years,
we may not achieve all of the operating expense reductions and
improvements in operating margins and cash flows anticipated
from those restructuring activities in the periods contemplated.
Our inability to realize these benefits may result in an
inefficient business structure that could negatively impact our
results of operations.
We have reduced the workforce in certain revenue-generating
portions of our business. These reductions in staffing levels
could require us to forego certain future opportunities due to
resource limitations, which could negatively affect our
long-term revenues. We may need to implement further
restructuring activities or reductions in our workforce based on
changes in the markets and industries in which we compete and
there is no assurance that any such restructuring efforts will
be successful.
The long sales cycle of our products and services makes
the timing of our revenue difficult to predict and may cause our
operating results to fluctuate unexpectedly.
Generally, we have a long sales cycle that can extend up to six
months or longer. The length of the sales cycle may cause our
revenue or operating results to vary from quarter to quarter.
The complexity and expense associated with our business
generally require a lengthy customer education, evaluation and
approval process. Consequently, we may incur substantial
expenses and devote significant management effort and expense to
develop potential relationships that do not result in agreements
or revenue and may prevent us from pursuing other opportunities.
In addition, sales of our products and services may be delayed
if customers delay approval or commencement of projects because
of:
|
|
|
|
|
The timing of customers competitive evaluation
processes; or
|
|
|
Customers budgetary constraints and budget cycles.
|
Long sales cycles for acceleration and emulation hardware
products subject us to a number of significant risks over which
we have limited control, including insufficient, excess or
obsolete inventory, variations in inventory valuation and
fluctuations in quarterly operating results.
The majority of our contracts are executed in the final two
weeks of a fiscal quarter. This makes it difficult to determine
with accuracy how much business will be executed in each fiscal
quarter. Also, because of the timing of large orders and our
customers buying patterns, we may not learn of bookings
shortfalls, revenue shortfalls, earnings shortfalls or other
failures to meet market expectations until late in a fiscal
quarter. These factors may cause our operating results to
fluctuate unexpectedly, which can cause significant fluctuations
in the trading price of our common stock.
We may not be able to sell certain installment contracts
to generate cash, which may impact our operating cash flows for
any particular fiscal period.
We sell certain installment contracts to certain financing
institutions on a non-recourse or limited-recourse basis to
generate cash. Our ability to complete these sales of
installment contracts is affected by a number of factors,
including the:
|
|
|
|
|
Economic conditions in the securities markets;
|
|
|
Credit policies of the financing institutions; and
|
|
|
Credit quality of customers whose installment contracts we wish
to sell.
|
If we are unable to sell certain installment contracts, our
operating cash flows would be adversely affected. There can be
no assurance that funding will be available to us or, if
available, that it will be on terms acceptable to us. If sources
of funding are not available to us on a regular basis for any
reason, including the occurrence of events of default,
deterioration in credit quality in the underlying pool of
receivables or otherwise, it would have a material adverse
effect on our operating cash flows.
51
The effect of foreign exchange rate fluctuations and other
risks to our international operations may seriously harm our
financial condition.
We have significant operations outside the United States. Our
revenue from international operations as a percentage of total
revenue was approximately 54% for the three months ended
June 28, 2008 and 50% for the three months ended
June 30, 2007. We expect that revenue from our
international operations will continue to account for a
significant portion of our total revenue. We also transact
business in various foreign currencies, primarily the Japanese
yen. The volatility of foreign currencies in certain regions,
most notably the Japanese yen, European Union euro, British
pound and Indian rupee have had, and may in the future have, a
harmful effect on our revenue or operating results.
Fluctuations in the rate of exchange between the United States
dollar and the currencies of other countries in which we conduct
business could seriously harm our business, operating results or
financial condition. For example, when a foreign currency
declines in value relative to the United States dollar, it takes
more of the foreign currency to purchase the same amount of
United States dollars than before the change. If we price our
products and services in the foreign currency, we receive fewer
United States dollars than we did before the change. If we price
our products and services in United States dollars, the decrease
in value of the local currency results in an increase in the
price for our products and services compared to those products
of our competitors that are priced in local currency. This could
result in our prices being uncompetitive in markets where
business is transacted in the local currency. On the other hand,
when a foreign currency increases in value relative to the
United States dollar, it takes more United States dollars to
purchase the same amount of the foreign currency. As we use the
foreign currency to pay for payroll costs and other operating
expenses in our international operations, this results in an
increase in operating expenses.
Exposure to foreign currency transaction risk can arise when
transactions are conducted in a currency different from the
functional currency of one of our subsidiaries. A
subsidiarys functional currency is generally the currency
in which it primarily conducts its operations, including product
pricing, expenses and borrowings. Although we attempt to reduce
the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, significant
exchange rate movements may hurt our results of operations as
expressed in United States dollars.
Our international operations may also be subject to other risks,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
The adoption or expansion of government trade restrictions;
|
|
|
Limitations on repatriation of earnings;
|
|
|
Limitations on the conversion of foreign currencies;
|
|
|
Reduced protection of intellectual property rights in some
countries;
|
|
|
Recessions in foreign economies;
|
|
|
Longer collection periods for receivables and greater difficulty
in collecting accounts receivable;
|
|
|
Difficulties in managing foreign operations;
|
|
|
Political and economic instability;
|
|
|
Unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
|
|
|
Tariffs and other trade barriers; and
|
|
|
United States and other governments licensing requirements
for exports, which may lengthen the sales cycle or restrict or
prohibit the sale or licensing of certain products.
|
We have offices throughout the world, including key research and
development facilities outside of the United States. Our
operations are dependent upon the connectivity of our operations
throughout the world. Activities that interfere with our
international connectivity, such as computer hacking or the
introduction of a virus into our computer systems, could
significantly interfere with our business operations.
Our operating results could be adversely affected as a
result of changes in our effective tax rates.
Our future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings being lower than anticipated in countries where we are
taxed at lower rates as compared to the United States federal
and state statutory tax rates;
|
|
|
An increase in expenses not deductible for tax purposes,
including certain stock-based compensation, write-offs of
acquired in-process technology and impairment of goodwill;
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets;
|
|
|
Changes in tax laws or the interpretation of such tax laws;
|
|
|
Changes in judgment from the evaluation of new information that
results in a recognition, derecognition, or change in
measurement of a tax position taken in a prior period;
|
|
|
Increases to interest expenses classified in the financial
statements as income taxes;
|
|
|
New accounting standards or interpretations of such standards;
|
|
|
A change in our decision to indefinitely reinvest foreign
earnings outside the United States; or
|
|
|
Results of tax examinations by the IRS and state and foreign tax
authorities.
|
Any significant change in our future effective tax rates could
adversely impact our results of operations for future periods.
We have received an examination report from the IRS
proposing deficiencies in certain of our tax returns, and the
outcome of current and future tax examinations may have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash
flows.
The IRS and other tax authorities regularly examine our income
tax returns. In July 2006, the IRS completed its field
examination of our federal income tax returns for the tax years
2000 through 2002 and issued an RAR in which the IRS proposed to
assess an aggregate tax deficiency for the three-year period of
approximately $324.0 million. In November 2006, the IRS
revised the proposed aggregate tax deficiency for the three-year
period to be approximately $318.0 million. The IRS is
contesting our qualification for deferred recognition of certain
proceeds received from restitution and settlement in connection
with litigation during the period. The proposed tax deficiency
for this item is approximately $152.0 million. The
remaining proposed tax deficiency of approximately
$166.0 million is primarily related to proposed adjustments
to our transfer pricing arrangements with foreign subsidiaries
and to our deductions for foreign trade income. The IRS may make
similar claims against our transfer pricing arrangements and
deductions for foreign trade income in future examinations. We
have filed a timely protest with the IRS and will seek
resolution of the issues through the Appeals Office.
We believe that the proposed IRS adjustments are inconsistent
with applicable tax laws and we are vigorously challenging these
proposed adjustments. The RAR is not a final Statutory Notice of
Deficiency but the IRS imposes interest on the proposed
deficiencies until the matters are resolved. Interest is
compounded daily at rates published and adjusted quarterly by
the IRS and have been between 4% and 10% since 2001. The IRS is
currently examining our federal income tax returns for the tax
years 2003 through 2005.
Significant judgment is required in applying the principles of
FIN No. 48 and SFAS No. 109. The calculation
of our provision for income taxes involves dealing with
uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws and
regulations. In determining the adequacy of our provision for
income taxes, we regularly assess the potential settlement
outcomes resulting from income tax examinations. However, the
final outcome of tax examinations, including the total amount
payable or the timing of any such payments upon resolution of
these issues, cannot be estimated with certainty. In addition,
we cannot be certain that such amount will not be materially
different than that which is reflected in our historical income
tax provisions and accruals. Should the IRS or other tax
authorities assess additional taxes as a result of a current or
a future examination, we may be required to record charges to
operations in future periods that could have a material impact
on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows
in the applicable period or periods.
Forecasting our estimated annual effective tax rate is
complex and subject to uncertainty, and material differences
between forecasted and actual tax rates could have a material
impact on our results of operations.
Forecasts of our income tax position and resultant effective tax
rate are complex and subject to uncertainty because our income
tax position for each year combines the effects of estimating
our annual income or loss, the mix of profits and losses earned
by us and our subsidiaries in tax jurisdictions with a broad
range of income tax rates, as well as benefits from available
deferred tax assets, the impact of various accounting rules and
changes to these rules and results of tax audits. To forecast
our global tax rate, pre-tax profits and losses by jurisdiction
are estimated and tax expense by jurisdiction is calculated. If
our estimate of the pre-tax profit and losses, the mix of our
profits and losses, our ability to use deferred tax assets, the
results of tax audits, or effective tax rates by jurisdiction is
different
53
than those estimates, our actual tax rate could be materially
different than forecasted, which could have a material impact on
our results of operations.
Failure to obtain export licenses could harm our business
by rendering us unable to ship products and transfer our
technology outside of the United States.
We must comply with regulations of the United States and of
certain other countries in shipping our software products and
transferring our technology outside the United States and to
foreign nationals. Although we have not had any significant
difficulty complying with such regulations so far, any
significant future difficulty in complying could harm our
business, operating results or financial condition.
Errors or defects in our products and services could
expose us to liability and harm our reputation.
Our customers use our products and services in designing and
developing products that involve a high degree of technological
complexity, each of which has its own specifications. Because of
the complexity of the systems and products with which we work,
some of our products and designs can be adequately tested only
when put to full use in the marketplace. As a result, our
customers or their end users may discover errors or defects in
our software or the systems we design, or the products or
systems incorporating our design and intellectual property may
not operate as expected. Errors or defects could result in:
|
|
|
|
|
Loss of customers;
|
|
|
Loss of market segment share;
|
|
|
Failure to attract new customers or achieve market acceptance;
|
|
|
Diversion of development resources to resolve the problem;
|
|
|
Loss of or delay in revenue;
|
|
|
Increased service costs; and
|
|
|
Liability for damages.
|
If we become subject to unfair hiring claims, we could be
prevented from hiring needed employees, incur liability for
damages and incur substantial costs in defending
ourselves.
Companies in our industry whose employees accept positions with
competitors frequently claim that these competitors have engaged
in unfair hiring practices or that the employment of these
persons would involve the disclosure or use of trade secrets.
These claims could prevent us from hiring employees or cause us
to incur liability for damages. We could also incur substantial
costs in defending ourselves or our employees against these
claims, regardless of their merits. Defending ourselves from
these claims could also divert the attention of our management
away from our operations.
Our business is subject to the risk of earthquakes.
Our corporate headquarters, including certain of our research
and development operations and certain of our distribution
facilities, is located in the Silicon Valley area of Northern
California, which is a region known to experience seismic
activity. If significant seismic activity were to occur, our
operations may be interrupted, which would adversely impact our
business and results of operations.
We maintain research and development and other facilities
in parts of the world that are not as politically stable as the
United States, and as a result we may face a higher risk of
business interruption from acts of war or terrorism than
businesses located only or primarily in the United
States.
We maintain international research and development and other
facilities, some of which are in parts of the world that are not
as politically stable as the United States. Consequently, we may
face a greater risk of business interruption as a result of
terrorist acts or military conflicts than businesses located
domestically. Furthermore, this potential harm is exacerbated
given that damage to or disruptions at our international
research and development facilities could have an adverse effect
on our ability to develop new or improve existing products as
compared to other businesses which may only have sales offices
or other less critical operations abroad. We are not insured for
losses or interruptions caused by acts of war or terrorism.
54
Risks
Related to Our Securities and Indebtedness
Our debt obligations expose us to risks that could
adversely affect our business, operating results or financial
condition, and could prevent us from fulfilling our obligations
under such indebtedness.
We have a substantial level of debt. As of June 28, 2008,
we had $730.4 million of outstanding indebtedness as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
$250.0 million related to our 1.375% Convertible
Senior Notes Due 2011, or the 2011 Notes;
|
|
|
$250.0 million related to our 1.500% Convertible
Senior Notes Due 2013, or the 2013 Notes and, together with the
2011 Notes, the Convertible Senior Notes; and
|
|
|
$230.4 million related to our Zero Coupon Zero Yield Senior
Convertible Notes Due 2023, or the 2023 Notes.
|
If the proposed acquisition of Mentor Graphics is successful, we
currently expect to incur in excess of $1.0 billion of new
debt capital.
The level of our current or future indebtedness, among other
things, could:
|
|
|
|
|
Make it difficult for us to satisfy our payment obligations on
our debt as described below;
|
|
|
Make us more vulnerable in the event of a downturn in our
business;
|
|
|
Reduce funds available for use in our operations;
|
|
|
Make it difficult for us to incur additional debt or obtain any
necessary financing in the future for working capital, capital
expenditures, debt service, acquisitions or general corporate
purposes;
|
|
|
Impose operating or financial covenants on us;
|
|
|
Limit our flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes in
our business;
|
|
|
Make us more vulnerable in the event of an increase in interest
rates if we must incur new debt to satisfy our obligations under
the Convertible Senior Notes or the 2023 Notes; or
|
|
|
Place us at a possible competitive disadvantage relative to less
leveraged competitors and competitors that have greater access
to capital resources.
|
If we experience a decline in revenue due to any of the factors
described in this section entitled Risk Factors, or
otherwise, we could have difficulty paying amounts due on our
indebtedness. In the case of the 2023 Notes, although they
mature in 2023, the holders of the 2023 Notes may require us to
repurchase for cash all or any portion of the 2023 Notes on
August 15, 2008 for 100.25% of the principal amount,
August 15, 2013 for 100.00% of the principal amount and
August 15, 2018 for 100.00% of the principal amount. As a
result, although the 2023 Notes mature in 2023, the holders may
require us to repurchase the 2023 Notes at an additional premium
in 2008, which makes it probable that we will be required to
repurchase the 2023 Notes in 2008 if they have not first been
repurchased by us or are not otherwise converted.
If we are prohibited from paying our outstanding indebtedness,
we could try to obtain the consent of the lenders under those
arrangements to make such payment, or we could attempt to
refinance the borrowings that contain the restrictions. If we do
not obtain the necessary consents or refinance the borrowings,
we may be unable to satisfy our outstanding indebtedness. Any
such failure would constitute an event of default under our
indebtedness, which could, in turn, constitute a default under
the terms of any other indebtedness then outstanding.
If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow or otherwise
obtain funds necessary to make required payments, or if we fail
to comply with the various requirements of our indebtedness, we
would be in default, which would permit the holders of our
indebtedness to accelerate the maturity of the indebtedness and
could cause defaults under our other indebtedness as well. Any
default under our indebtedness could have a material adverse
effect on our business, operating results and financial
condition. In addition, a material default on our indebtedness
could suspend our eligibility to register securities using
certain registration statement forms under SEC guidelines that
permit incorporation by reference of substantial information
regarding us, which could potentially hinder our ability to
raise capital through the issuance of our securities and will
increase the costs of such registration to us.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP APB14-1, Accounting for
Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon
Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement), which will
require us to recognize additional non-cash interest expense
related to our Convertible Senior Notes in our Condensed
Consolidated Statements of
55
Operations. FSP APB
14-1 is
effective for fiscal 2009 and is required to be applied
retrospectively for all periods for which our Convertible Senior
Notes were outstanding prior to the date of adoption. FSP APB
14-1 will
have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial
condition, particularly with respect to interest expense ratios
commonly referred to by lenders, and could potentially hinder
our ability to raise capital through the issuance of debt or
equity securities.
Conversion of the 2023 Notes or the Convertible Senior
Notes will dilute the ownership interests of existing
stockholders.
The terms of the 2023 Notes and the Convertible Senior Notes
permit the holders to convert the 2023 Notes and the Convertible
Senior Notes into shares of our common stock. The 2023 Notes are
convertible into our common stock initially at a conversion
price of $15.65 per share, which would result in an aggregate of
approximately 14.7 million shares of our common stock being
issued upon conversion, subject to adjustment upon the
occurrence of specified events. The terms of the Convertible
Senior Notes stipulate a net share settlement, which upon
conversion of the Convertible Senior Notes requires us to pay
the principal amount in cash and the conversion premium, if any,
in shares of our common stock based on a daily settlement
amount, calculated on a proportionate basis for each day of the
relevant 20
trading-day
observation period. The initial conversion rate for the
Convertible Senior Notes is 47.2813 shares of our common
stock per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Senior Notes,
equivalent to a conversion price of approximately $21.15 per
share of our common stock. The conversion price is subject to
adjustment in some events but will not be adjusted for accrued
interest, except in limited circumstances. The conversion of
some or all of the 2023 Notes or the Convertible Senior Notes
will dilute the ownership interest of our existing stockholders.
Any sales in the public market of the common stock issuable upon
conversion could adversely affect prevailing market prices of
our common stock.
Prior to conversion of the 2023 Notes, if the trading price of
our common stock exceeds $22.69 per share over specified
periods, basic net income per share will be diluted. We may
redeem for cash all or any part of the 2023 Notes on or after
August 15, 2008 for 100.00% of the principal amount, except
for the 2023 Notes that the holders require us to repurchase on
the repurchase dates described below. The holders of the 2023
Notes may require us to repurchase for cash all or any portion
of their 2023 Notes on August 15, 2008 for 100.25% of the
principal amount, on August 15, 2013 for 100.00% of the
principal amount or on August 15, 2018 for 100.00% of the
principal amount, by providing to the paying agent a written
repurchase notice. On July 16, 2008, we filed a Tender
Offer Statement on Schedule TO with the SEC and made
available to the holders of the 2023 Notes, through the
Depository Trust Company, documents specifying the terms,
conditions and procedures for requiring us to repurchase all or
a portion of the 2023 Notes on August 15, 2008 for 100.25%
of the principal amount.
Each $1,000 of principal of the 2023 Notes is initially
convertible into 63.879 shares of our common stock, subject
to adjustment upon the occurrence of specified events. Holders
of the 2023 Notes may convert their 2023 Notes prior to maturity
only if:
|
|
|
|
|
The price of our common stock reaches $22.69 during certain
periods of time specified in the 2023 Notes;
|
|
|
Specified corporate transactions occur;
|
|
|
The 2023 Notes have been called for redemption; or
|
|
|
The trading price of the 2023 Notes falls below a certain
threshold.
|
As a result, although the 2023 Notes mature in 2023, the holders
may require us to repurchase their notes at an additional
premium in 2008, which makes it probable that we will be
required to repurchase the 2023 Notes in 2008 if they have not
first been repurchased by us or are not otherwise converted. As
of June 28, 2008, none of the conditions allowing holders
of the 2023 Notes to convert had been met.
Each $1,000 of principal of the Convertible Senior Notes is
initially convertible into 47.2813 shares of our common
stock, subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of specified
events. Holders of the Convertible Senior Notes may convert
their notes at their option on any day prior to the close of
business on the scheduled trading day
56
immediately preceding December 15, 2011 in the case of the
2011 Notes and December 15, 2013 in the case of the 2013
Notes, in each case only if:
|
|
|
|
|
The price of our common stock reaches $27.50 during certain
periods of time specified in the Convertible Senior Notes;
|
|
|
Specified corporate transactions occur; or
|
|
|
The trading price of the Convertible Senior Notes falls below a
certain threshold.
|
On and after November 2, 2011, in the case of the 2011
Notes, and November 1, 2013, in the case of 2013 Notes,
until the close of business on the scheduled trading day
immediately preceding the maturity date of such Convertible
Senior Notes, holders may convert their Convertible Senior Notes
at any time, regardless of the foregoing circumstances. As of
June 28, 2008, none of the conditions allowing holders of
the Convertible Senior Notes to convert had been met.
Although the conversion price of the 2023 Notes is currently
$15.65 per share, the hedge and warrant transactions that we
entered into in connection with the issuance of the 2023 Notes
effectively increased the conversion price of the 2023 Notes
until various dates in 2008 to approximately $23.08 per share,
which would result in an aggregate issuance upon conversion
prior to August 15, 2008 of approximately 10.2 million
shares of our common stock. We entered into hedge and warrant
transactions to reduce the potential dilution from the
conversion of the 2023 Notes. On various dates from February
2008 through May 2008, all of the warrants expired out of the
money and no settlement was required. We cannot guarantee that
such hedge instruments will fully mitigate the dilution. In
addition, the existence of the 2023 Notes may encourage short
selling by market participants because the conversion of the
2023 Notes could depress the price of our common stock.
Although the conversion price of the Convertible Senior Notes is
currently $21.15 per share, we entered into hedge and separate
warrant transactions to reduce the potential dilution from the
conversion of the Convertible Senior Notes. However, we cannot
guarantee that such hedges and warrant instruments will fully
mitigate the dilution. In addition, the existence of the
Convertible Senior Notes may encourage short selling by market
participants because the conversion of the Convertible Senior
Notes could depress the price of our common stock.
At the option of the 2023 Noteholders and the Convertible
Senior Noteholders under certain circumstances, we may be
required to repurchase the 2023 Notes and the Convertible Senior
Notes, as the case may be, in cash or shares of our common
stock.
Under the terms of the 2023 Notes and the Convertible Senior
Notes, we may be required to repurchase the 2023 Notes and the
Convertible Senior Notes following a fundamental
change in our corporate ownership or structure, such as a
change of control in which substantially all of the
consideration does not consist of publicly traded securities,
prior to maturity of the 2023 Notes and the Convertible Senior
Notes, as the case may be. Following a fundamental change, in
certain circumstances, we may choose to pay the repurchase price
of the 2023 Notes in cash, shares of our common stock or a
combination of cash and shares of our common stock. If we choose
to pay all or any part of the repurchase price of the 2023 Notes
in shares of our common stock, this would result in dilution to
the holders of our common stock. The repurchase price for the
Convertible Senior Notes in the event of a fundamental change
must be paid solely in cash. These repayment obligations may
have the effect of discouraging, delaying or preventing a
takeover of our company that may otherwise be beneficial to
investors.
Hedge and warrant transactions entered into in connection
with the issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes and the 2023
Notes may affect the value of our common stock.
We entered into hedge transactions with various financial
institutions, at the time of issuance of the Convertible Senior
Notes and the 2023 Notes, with the objective of reducing the
potential dilutive effect of issuing our common stock upon
conversion of the Convertible Senior Notes and the 2023 Notes.
We also entered into separate warrant transactions with the same
financial institutions. In connection with our hedge and warrant
transactions, these financial institutions purchased our common
stock in secondary market transactions and entered into various
over-the-counter derivative transactions with respect to our
common stock. These entities or their affiliates are likely to
modify their hedge positions from time to time prior to
conversion or maturity of the Convertible Senior Notes and the
2023 Notes by purchasing and selling shares of our common stock,
other of our securities or other instruments they may wish to
use in connection with such hedging. Any of these transactions
and activities could adversely
57
affect the value of our common stock and, as a result, the
number of shares and the value of the common stock holders will
receive upon conversion of the Convertible Senior Notes and the
2023 Notes. In addition, subject to movement in the price of our
common stock, if the hedge transactions settle in our favor, we
could be exposed to credit risk related to the other party with
respect to the payment we are owed from such other party.
Rating agencies may provide unsolicited ratings on the
Convertible Senior Notes that could reduce the market value or
liquidity of our common stock.
We have not requested a rating of the Convertible Senior Notes
from any rating agency and we do not anticipate that the
Convertible Senior Notes will be rated. However, if one or more
rating agencies independently elects to rate the Convertible
Senior Notes and assigns the Convertible Senior Notes a rating
lower than the rating expected by investors, or reduces such
rating in the future, the market price or liquidity of the
Convertible Senior Notes and our common stock could be harmed.
Should a decline in the market price of the Convertible Senior
Notes result, as compared to the price of our common stock, this
may trigger the right of the holders of the Convertible Senior
Notes to convert the Convertible Senior Notes into cash and
shares of our common stock.
Anti-takeover defenses in our certificate of incorporation
and bylaws and certain provisions under Delaware law could
prevent an acquisition of our company or limit the price that
investors might be willing to pay for our common stock.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and certain
provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law that apply to
us could make it difficult for another company to acquire
control of our company. For example:
|
|
|
|
|
Our certificate of incorporation allows our Board of Directors
to issue, at any time and without stockholder approval,
preferred stock with such terms as it may determine. No shares
of preferred stock are currently outstanding. However, the
rights of holders of any of our preferred stock that may be
issued in the future may be superior to the rights of holders of
our common stock.
|
|
|
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law
generally prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in any
business combination with a person owning 15% or more of its
voting stock, or who is affiliated with the corporation and
owned 15% or more of its voting stock at any time within three
years prior to the proposed business combination, for a period
of three years from the date the person became a 15% owner,
unless specified conditions are met.
|
All or any one of these factors could limit the price that
certain investors would be willing to pay for shares of our
common stock and could delay, prevent or allow our Board of
Directors to resist an acquisition of our company, even if a
proposed transaction were favored by a majority of our
independent stockholders.
58
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
In December 2006, our Board of Directors authorized a program to
repurchase shares of our common stock in the open market with a
value of up to $500.0 million in the aggregate that was
completed during the six months ended June 28, 2008. In
February 2008, our Board of Directors authorized a new program
to repurchase shares of our common stock in the open market with
a value of up to $500.0 million in the aggregate. The
following table sets forth the repurchases we made during the
three months ended June 28, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Shares that
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
May Yet
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
Be Purchased Under
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
as Part of
|
|
Publicly Announced
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Publicly Announced
|
|
Plan or Program*
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased*
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Plan or Program
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
March 30, 2008
May 3, 2008
|
|
|
71,258
|
|
|
$
|
10.80
|
|
|
----
|
|
$
|
412.1
|
|
May 4, 2008
May 31, 2008
|
|
|
12,615
|
|
|
$
|
11.23
|
|
|
----
|
|
$
|
412.1
|
|
June 1, 2008
June 28, 2008
|
|
|
15,717
|
|
|
$
|
10.79
|
|
|
----
|
|
$
|
412.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
99,590
|
|
|
$
|
10.85
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Shares purchased that were not part of our publicly announced
repurchase program represent the surrender of shares of
restricted stock to pay income taxes due upon vesting, and do
not reduce the dollar value that may yet be purchased under our
publicly announced repurchase program. |
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
None.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 7, 2008,
the stockholders of Cadence voted on the following matters:
1. A proposal to elect eight (8) directors of Cadence
to serve for the following year and until their successors are
elected or until such directors earlier resignation or
removal was approved as set forth below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominee
|
|
In Favor
|
|
|
Opposed
|
|
|
Withheld
|
|
Michael J. Fister
|
|
|
224,712,185
|
|
|
|
2,697,107
|
|
|
|
326,493
|
Donald L. Lucas
|
|
|
191,061,755
|
|
|
|
35,992,618
|
|
|
|
681,412
|
Dr. Alberto Sangiovanni-Vincentelli
|
|
|
218,815,611
|
|
|
|
8,558,575
|
|
|
|
361,599
|
George M. Scalise
|
|
|
204,864,846
|
|
|
|
22,515,983
|
|
|
|
354,956
|
Dr. John B. Shoven
|
|
|
204,734,545
|
|
|
|
22,616,887
|
|
|
|
384,353
|
Roger S. Siboni
|
|
|
225,158,809
|
|
|
|
2,185,558
|
|
|
|
391,418
|
John A.C. Swainson
|
|
|
224,772,589
|
|
|
|
2,544,455
|
|
|
|
418,741
|
Lip-Bu Tan
|
|
|
211,840,990
|
|
|
|
15,466,468
|
|
|
|
428,327
|
59
2. A proposal to approve an amendment to the Amended and
Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan to increase the number of
shares of common stock reserved for issuance thereunder was
approved by a vote of 185,598,052 for, 2,978,478 opposed,
814,327 withheld and 38,344,928 broker non-votes.
3. A proposal to ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as
Cadences independent registered public accounting firm for
the fiscal year ending January 3, 2009 was approved by a
vote of 226,008,158 for, 1,407,467 opposed, 320,160 withheld and
no broker non-votes.
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
60
(a) The following exhibits are filed herewith:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filing
|
|
Provided
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Title
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
No.
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
31.01
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Executive Officer,
Michael J. Fister, pursuant to
Rule 13a-14
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
31.02
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Financial Officer,
Kevin S. Palatnik, pursuant to
Rule 13a-14
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
32.01
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Executive Officer,
Michael J. Fister, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
32.02
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Financial Officer,
Kevin S. Palatnik, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
61
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Michael J. Fister
Michael
J. Fister
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Kevin S. Palatnik
Kevin
S. Palatnik
Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
|
62
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filing
|
|
Provided
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Title
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
No.
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
31.01
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Executive Officer,
Michael J. Fister, pursuant to
Rule 13a-14
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
31.02
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Financial Officer,
Kevin S. Palatnik, pursuant to
Rule 13a-14
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
32.01
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Executive Officer,
Michael J. Fister, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
32.02
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Financial Officer,
Kevin S. Palatnik, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|