UNITED STATES
SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
------------------------
FORM 10-Q
|X| Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 25, 2004, or
|_| Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition period from _________ to ________.
Commission File No. 1-5375
TECHNITROL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its Charter)
PENNSYLVANIA 23-1292472
(State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
1210 Northbrook Drive, Suite 385
Trevose, Pennsylvania 19053
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 215-355-2900
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing
requirements for at least the past 90 days. YES |X| NO |_|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filter (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) YES |X| NO |_|
Common Stock - Shares Outstanding as of July 20, 2004: 40,423,340
(Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of
Common Stock, as of the latest practicable dates.)
Page 1 of 32
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1: Financial Statements
Technitrol, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
In thousands
June 25, December 26,
Assets 2004 2003
---- ----
(unaudited)
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 154,053 $ 143,448
Trade receivables, net 103,929 96,353
Inventories 70,623 63,086
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 17,459 17,435
--------- ---------
Total current assets 346,064 320,322
Property, plant and equipment 207,132 205,885
Less accumulated depreciation 124,099 117,836
--------- ---------
Net property, plant and equipment 83,033 88,049
Deferred income taxes 16,020 12,457
Goodwill and other intangibles, net 150,789 153,083
Other assets 15,508 14,983
--------- ---------
$ 611,414 $ 588,894
========= =========
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Current liabilities:
Current installments of long-term debt $ 143 $ 127
Accounts payable 46,958 46,677
Accrued expenses 80,600 73,748
--------- ---------
Total current liabilities 127,701 120,552
Long-term liabilities:
Long-term debt, excluding current installments 6,445 6,710
Other long-term liabilities 13,411 12,882
Shareholders' equity:
Common stock and additional paid-in capital 213,094 209,768
Retained earnings 247,863 232,824
Deferred compensation (2,762) (1,342)
Other comprehensive income 5,662 7,500
--------- ---------
Total shareholders' equity 463,857 448,750
--------- ---------
$ 611,414 $ 588,894
========= =========
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
Page 2 of 32
Technitrol, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
In thousands, except per share data
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 25, June 27, June 25, June 27,
2004 2003 2004 2003
---- ---- ---- ----
Net sales $ 146,970 $ 125,706 $ 286,577 $ 248,250
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales 107,378 92,888 208,886 185,011
Selling, general and administrative expenses 28,436 24,558 56,089 48,292
Severance and asset impairment expense 1,484 505 4,341 4,398
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total costs and expenses applicable to sales 137,298 117,951 269,316 237,701
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Operating profit 9,672 7,755 17,261 10,549
Other income (expense):
Interest expense, net (153) (257) (305)
(544)
Equity method investment earnings 257 233 392 505
Other 1,290 (445) 576 (485)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total other income (expense) 1,394 (469) 663 (524)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Earnings before taxes 11,066 7,286 17,924 10,025
Income taxes 1,792 1,266 2,885 1,371
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Net earnings $ 9,274 $ 6,020 $ 15,039 $ 8,654
========= ========= ========= =========
Basic earnings per share $ 0.23 $ 0.15 $ 0.37 $ 0.22
========= ========= ========= =========
Diluted earnings per share $ 0.23 $ 0.15 $ 0.37 $ 0.22
========= ========= ========= =========
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
Page 3 of 32
Technitrol, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
In thousands
Six Months Ended
June 25, 2004 June 27, 2003
------------- -------------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings $ 15,039 $ 8,654
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided
by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 11,926 11,793
Tax effect of employee stock compensation -- 123
Amortization of stock incentive plan expense 1,665 1,011
Severance and asset impairment expense, net of cash payments 2,800 600
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions:
Trade receivables (8,935) 96
Inventories (8,412) 6,212
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 890 (3,732)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 6,274 (5,548)
Other, net (4,233) (5,023)
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 17,014 14,186
--------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired (4,050) (81,926)
Capital expenditures (3,866) (3,499)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment 413 347
Foreign currency impact on intercompany lending 1,882 (5,866)
--------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities (5,621) (90,944)
--------- ---------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Principal payments of long-term debt, net (322) (11,794)
Sale of stock through employee stock purchase plan 427 481
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 105 (11,313)
--------- ---------
Net effect of exchange rate changes on cash (893) (1,174)
--------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 10,605 (89,245)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 143,448 205,075
--------- ---------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 154,053 $ 115,830
--------- ---------
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
Page 4 of 32
Technitrol, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
Six Months Ended June 25, 2004
(Unaudited)
In thousands
Other
--------------------------
Accumu-
Common stock and lated other
paid-in capital Deferred compre- Compre-
---------------------- Retained compen- hensive hensive
Shares Amount earnings sation income income
------ ------ -------- ------ ------ ------
Balance at December 26, 2003 40,279 $ 209,768 $ 232,824 $ (1,342) $ 7,500
Stock options, awards and related
compensation 117 2,909 (1,420)
Stock issued under employee stock
purchase plan 27 417
Currency translation adjustments (1,838) $ (1,838)
Net earnings 15,039 15,039
---------
Comprehensive income $ 13,201
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- =========
Balance at June 25, 2004 40,423 $ 213,094 $ 247,863 $ (2,762) $ 5,662
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
Page 5 of 32
Technitrol, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(1) Accounting Policies
For a complete description of the accounting policies of Technitrol, Inc.
and its consolidated subsidiaries, refer to Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements included in Technitrol's Form 10-K filed for the year ended
December 26, 2003. We sometimes refer to Technitrol as "we" or "our".
The results for the six months ended June 25, 2004 and June 27, 2003 have
been prepared by our management without audit by our independent auditors. In
the opinion of management, the financial statements fairly present in all
material respects, the financial position and results of operations for the
periods presented. To the best of our knowledge and belief, all adjustments have
been made to properly reflect income and expenses attributable to the periods
presented. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Operating
results for the six months ended June 25, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of
annual results.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 132 (revised 2003), Employers'
Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits, an amendment of
FASB Statements No. 87, 88, and 106, and a revision of FASB Statement No. 132
("SFAS 132R"). SFAS 132R revises employers' disclosures about pension plans and
other postretirement benefit plans. It does not change the measurement or
recognition of those plans required by SFAS No. 87, Employers' Accounting for
Pensions, SFAS No. 88, Employers' Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of
Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits, and SFAS No. 106,
Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions. The new
rules require additional disclosures about the assets, obligations, cash flows,
and net periodic benefit cost of defined benefit pension plans and other
postretirement benefit plans. The required information will be provided
separately for pension plans and for other postretirement benefit plans. The new
disclosures became effective for fiscal 2003 year-end financial statements and
certain interim disclosures in 2004. Adoption of this standard did not have any
effect on our revenue, operating results, financial position or liquidity.
In December 2003, FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (revised December
2003) Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities ("FIN 46R"). FIN 46R clarifies
the application of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial
Statements, to certain entities in which equity investors do not have the
characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient
equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional
subordinated financial support from other parties. FIN 46R replaces FASB
Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities which was
issued in January 2003. We were required to apply FIN 46R to variable interests
in variable interest entities created after December 31, 2003. For variable
interests in variable interest entities created before January 1, 2004, the
final interpretation was required to be applied no later than the end of the
first reporting period that ends after March 15, 2004. We do not have any
variable interests or variable interest entities and the adoption of this
interpretation did not have a material effect on our revenue, operating results,
financial position, or liquidity.
In April 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities ("SFAS 149"), which amends and clarifies financial accounting and
reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments
embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities under SFAS 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS 149 requires
that contracts with comparable characteristics be accounted for similarly and
clarifies under what circumstances a contract with an initial net investment
meets the characteristic of a derivative and when a derivative contains a
financing component. SFAS 149 also amends the definition of the term
"underlying" to conform it to language used in FIN No. 45, Guarantor's
Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect
Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. SFAS 149 is effective for contracts
entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, with certain exceptions. We
adopted SFAS 149 as of June 1, 2003, and the adoption of this standard did not
have a material impact on our revenue, operating results, financial position or
liquidity.
Page 6 of 32
Technitrol, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
(1) Accounting Policies, continued
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in the prior year financial statements have been
reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.
(2) Acquisitions
Eldor High Tech Wire Wound Components S.r.L.: In January 2003, we acquired
all of the capital stock of Eldor High Tech Wire Wound Components S.r.L.
(Eldor), headquartered in Senna Comasco, Italy with production operations in
Izmir and Istanbul, Turkey. Eldor produces flyback transformers and switch mode
transformers for the European television market. The acquisition was accounted
for by the purchase method of accounting. The purchase price was approximately
$83.9 million net of cash acquired, plus related acquisition costs and expenses.
The fair value of net tangible assets acquired approximated $8.3 million. Based
on the fair value of assets acquired, the purchase price allocation included
$18.6 million for manufacturing know-how, $6.1 million for customer
relationships, $1.5 million for tradename and $21.8 million allocated to
goodwill. All of the separately identifiable intangible assets are being
amortized, with estimated useful lives of 20 years for manufacturing know-how, 8
years for customer relationships and 2 years for tradename. The purchase price
was funded with cash on hand. At closing, Eldor had no funded debt. Eldor has
formed the nucleus of a new consumer division at Pulse and is treated as a
separate reporting unit for purposes of SFAS 142.
Full Rise Electronics Co. Ltd. (FRE): FRE is based in the Republic of
China (Taiwan) and manufactures connector products, including single and
multiple-port jacks, and supplies such products to us under a cooperation
agreement. In April 2001, we made a minority investment in the common stock of
FRE, which was accounted for by the cost-basis method of accounting. On July 27,
2002, we made an additional investment in FRE of $6.7 million which increased
the total investment to $20.9 million. As a result of the increased ownership
percentage to approximately 29%, we began to account for the investment under
the equity method of accounting beginning in the three months ended September
27, 2002. Shares of FRE began trading on the Taiwan Stock Exchange in January
2003, and they experienced considerable price volatility. In the three months
ended December 26, 2003, we recorded an $8.7 million net loss to adjust our
original cost basis of the investment to market value. In July 2004 we purchased
an additional equity interest of 6.8 million outstanding common stock shares in
FRE for $8.5 million. This additional investment brings our total investment
percentage up to 48%. We maintain an option to acquire up to a 51% interest in
FRE at its market value at the time of exercise.
(3) Severance and asset impairment expense
In the six months ended June 25, 2004, we accrued $4.3 million for
severance and related payments comprised of $2.5 million related to AMI Doduco's
termination of manufacturing and support personnel at a facility in Germany,
$0.8 million related to the termination of manufacturing and support personnel
at a facility in France, $0.7 million related to Pulse's shutdown of a facility
in Carlsbad, California and $0.3 million for other severances in various
locations. The vast majority of these accruals will be utilized by October 1,
2004. We expect to accrue an additional $1.0 million of severance and asset
impairment expense in the third quarter of 2004 in connection with the
completion of the shutdown of the AMI Doduco facility in France.
In the six months ended June 27, 2003, we accrued $4.4 million for
severance and related payments comprising $1.9 million for the elimination of
manufacturing and support positions at AMI Doduco's facility in Germany, $1.6
million to finalize the shutdown of a redundant facility in Spain acquired from
Engelhard-CLAL by a subsidiary of AMI Doduco in 2001 and $0.9 million for the
elimination of manufacturing and support positions at Pulse, primarily in the
United Kingdom, France and Mexico. The majority of these accruals were utilized
by the end of the third quarter of 2003.
Page 7 of 32
Technitrol, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
(3) Severance and asset impairment expense, continued
Our severance and asset impairment charges are summarized on a
year-to-date basis for 2004 is as follows (in millions):
AMI
Doduco Pulse Total
------ ----- -----
Balance accrued at December 26, 2003 $2.1 $1.7 $3.8
Accrued during the six months ended June 25, 2004 3.6 0.7 4.3
Severance and other cash payments (2.8) (0.9) (3.7)
Non-cash asset disposals (0.1) 0.1 --
---- ---- ----
Balance accrued at June 25, 2004 $2.8 $1.6 $4.4
(4) Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
June 25, December 26,
2004 2003
---- ----
Finished goods $27,409 $25,326
Work in process 15,942 13,867
Raw materials and supplies 27,272 23,893
------- -------
$70,623 $63,086
======= =======
(5) Derivatives and Other Financial Instruments
We utilize derivative financial instruments, primarily forward exchange
contracts, to manage foreign currency risks. While these hedging instruments are
subject to fluctuations in value, such fluctuations are generally offset by the
value of the underlying exposures being hedged.
At June 25, 2004, we had one foreign exchange forward contract outstanding
to sell forward approximately 61.5 million euros in the aggregate, in order to
hedge intercompany loans. The term of this contract was approximately 30 days,
although we routinely settle such obligations and enter into new 30-day
contracts each month. We had no other financial derivative instruments at June
25, 2004. In addition, management believes that there is no material risk of
loss from changes in inherent market rates or prices in our other financial
instruments.
(6) Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing net earnings by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding (excluding restricted
shares) during the period. We had restricted shares outstanding of approximately
256,000 and 141,000 as of June 25, 2004 and June 27, 2003, respectively. For
calculating diluted earnings per share, common share equivalents and restricted
stock outstanding are added to the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding. Common share equivalents result from outstanding options to
purchase common stock as calculated using the treasury stock method. Such common
share equivalent amounts were approximately 17,000 for the six months ended June
25, 2004. There were approximately 457,000 stock options outstanding for the six
months ended June 25, 2004 and approximately 337,000 as of June 27, 2003.
Page 8 of 32
Technitrol, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
(6) Earnings Per Share, continued
Earnings per share calculations are as follows (in thousands, except per
share amounts):
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 25, June 27, June 25, June 27,
2004 2003 2004 2003
---- ---- ---- ----
Net earnings $ 9,274 $ 6,020 $ 15,039 $ 8,654
Basic earnings per share:
Shares 40,164 40,062 40,142 40,026
Per share amount $ 0.23 $ 0.15 $ 0.37 $ 0.22
======== ======== ======== ========
Diluted earnings per share:
Shares 40,408 40,160 40,364 40,147
Per share amount $ 0.23 $ 0.15 $ 0.37 $ 0.22
======== ======== ======== ========
(7) Business Segment Information
For the three months ended June 25, 2004 and June 27, 2003 there were
immaterial amounts of intersegment revenues eliminated in consolidation. There
has been no material change in segment assets from December 26, 2003 to June 25,
2004. In addition, the basis for determining segment financial information has
not changed from 2003. Specific segment data are as follows:
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 25, June 27, June 25, June 27,
Net sales: 2004 2003 2004 2003
---- ---- ---- ----
Pulse $ 81,455 $ 71,766 $ 158,993 $ 139,646
AMI Doduco 65,515 53,940 127,584 108,604
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total $ 146,970 $ 125,706 $ 286,577 $ 248,250
========= ========= ========= =========
Earnings before income taxes:
Pulse $ 9,771 $ 6,997 $ 18,441 $ 12,553
AMI Doduco (99) 758 (1,180) (2004)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Operating profit 9,672 7,755 17,261 10,549
Other income (expense), net 1,394 (469) 663 (524)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Earnings before income taxes $ 11,066 $ 7,286 $ 17,924 $ 10,025
========= ========= ========= =========
(8) Accounting for Stock Based Compensation
We adopted SFAS 123, as amended by SFAS 148, at the beginning of the 2003
fiscal year. We implemented SFAS 123 under the prospective method approach per
SFAS 148, whereby compensation expense is recorded for all awards granted
subsequent to adoption.
As permitted by the provisions of SFAS 123, we applied Accounting
Principles Board Opinion 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" and
related interpretations in accounting for our stock option and purchase plans
prior to adoption of SFAS 123 in fiscal 2003. Accordingly, no compensation cost
was recognized for our stock option awards and employee purchase plan awards
prior to fiscal 2003.
Page 9 of 32
Technitrol, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
(8) Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, continued
If compensation cost for our stock option plan and stock purchase plan had
been determined based on the fair value as required by SFAS 123 for all awards
(including those made prior to 2003), our pro forma net earnings and earnings
per basic and diluted share would have been as follows, (in thousands, except
per share amounts):
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 25, June 27, June 25, June 27,
2004 2003 2004 2003
---- ---- ---- ----
Net earnings, as reported $9,274 $6,020 $15,039 $ 8,654
Add: Stock-based compensation expense included
in reported net earnings, net of taxes 614 327 998 607
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined
under fair value based method for all awards, net of taxes (882) (540) (1,469) (1,056)
------ ------ ------- -------
Net earnings adjusted $9,006 $5,807 $14,568 $ 8,205
Basic net earnings per share - as reported $ 0.23 $ 0.15 $ 0.37 $ 0.22
Basic net earnings per share - adjusted $ 0.22 $ 0.14 $ 0.36 $ 0.21
Diluted net earnings per share - as reported $ 0.23 $ 0.15 $ 0.37 $ 0.22
Diluted net earnings per share - adjusted $ 0.22 $ 0.14 $ 0.36 $ 0.21
At June 25, 2004, we had approximately 457,000 options outstanding,
representing approximately 1% of our outstanding shares of common stock. The
value of restricted stock has always been and continues to be recorded as
compensation expense over the restricted period, and such expense is included in
the results of operations for the periods ended June 25, 2004 and June 27, 2003,
respectively.
(9) Pension
In the six months ended June 25, 2004 we were not required to, nor did we,
make any contributions to our qualified pension plan. Our net periodic expense
was approximately $0.7 million in the six months ended June 25, 2004.
(10) Subsequent Event
In July 2004 we purchased an additional equity interest of 6.8 million
outstanding common stock shares in Full Rise Electronics Ltd. ("FRE") for $8.5
million. This additional investment brings our total investment percentage up to
48%. We maintain an option to acquire up to a 51% interest in FRE in the future.
Page 10 of 32
Item 2: Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Introduction
This discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations as well as other sections of this report, contain certain
"forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and involve a number of risks and uncertainties.
Actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these
forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the risks faced by us
described in "Risk Factors" section of this report on page 21 through 26.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires us to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts
reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Note 1
to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the period ended December 26, 2003 describes the significant accounting policies
and methods used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Estimates are used for, but not limited to, the accounting for inventory
valuation, impairment of goodwill and other intangibles, severance and asset
impairment expense, income taxes, and contingency accruals. Actual results could
differ from these estimates. The following critical accounting policies are
impacted significantly by judgments, assumptions and estimates used in the
preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Inventory Valuation. Inventory purchases and commitments are based upon
future demand forecasts estimated by taking into account actual purchases of our
products over the recent past and customer forecasts. If there is a sudden and
significant decrease in demand for our products or there is a higher risk of
inventory obsolescence because of rapidly changing technology or customer
requirements, we may be required to write down our inventory and our gross
margin could be negatively affected. If we were to sell or use a significant
portion of inventory already written down, our gross margin could be positively
affected.
Impairment of Goodwill and Other Intangibles. We assess the carrying cost
of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives on an annual basis and
between annual tests in certain circumstances. In addition, in response to
changes in industry and market conditions, we may strategically realign our
resources and consider restructuring, disposing of, or otherwise exiting
businesses, which could result in an impairment of goodwill or other
intangibles.
Severance and Asset Impairment Expense. Our restructuring activities are
designed to reduce both our fixed and variable costs, particularly in response
to the on-going price competition in both segments. These costs include the
consolidation of facilities and the termination of employees.
Acquisition-related costs are included in the allocation of the cost of the
acquired business. Other restructuring costs are expensed during the period in
which we determine that we will incur those costs, and all of the requirements
for accrual are met in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance.
Restructuring costs are recorded based upon our best estimates at the time. Our
actual expenditures for the restructuring activities may differ from the
initially recorded costs. If this occurs, we adjust our initial estimates in
future periods. In the case of acquisition-related restructuring costs,
depending on whether the assets impacted came from the acquired entity and the
timing of the restructuring charge, such adjustment would generally require a
change in value of the goodwill appearing on our balance sheet, which may not
affect our current earnings. In the case of other restructuring costs, we could
be required either to record additional expenses in future periods if our
initial estimates were too low, or reverse part of the charges that we recorded
initially if our initial estimates were too high.
Income Taxes. Except in limited circumstances, we have not provided for
U.S. federal income and foreign withholding taxes on non-U.S. subsidiaries'
undistributed earnings as calculated for income tax purposes. In accordance with
the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 23, Accounting for
Income Taxes - Special Areas ("APB 23") we intend to reinvest these earnings
outside the U.S. indefinitely. If we encounter a significant domestic need for
liquidity that we cannot fulfill through borrowings, equity offerings, or other
internal or external sources, we may experience unfavorable tax consequences as
cash invested outside the U.S. is transferred to the U.S. This adverse
consequence would occur if the transfer of cash into the U.S. were subject to
income tax without sufficient foreign tax credits available to offset the U.S.
tax liability.
Page 11 of 32
Contingency Accruals. During the normal course of business, a variety of
issues may arise, which may result in litigation, environmental compliance
issues and other contingent obligations. In developing our contingency accruals
we consider both the likelihood of a loss or incurrence of a liability as well
as our ability to reasonably estimate the amount of exposure. We record
contingency accruals when a liability is probable and the amount can be
reasonably estimated. We periodically evaluate available information to assess
whether contingency accruals should be adjusted. We could be required to record
additional expenses in future periods if our initial estimates were too low, or
reverse part of the charges that we recorded initially if our estimates were too
high.
Overview
We are a global producer of precision-engineered passive magnetics-based
electronic components and electrical contact products and materials. We believe
we are a leading global producer of these products and materials in the primary
markets we serve based on our estimates of the size of our primary markets in
annual revenues and our share of those markets relative to our competitors.
We operate our business in two distinct segments:
o the electronic components segment, which operates under the name
Pulse, and
o the electrical contact products segment, which operates under the
name AMI Doduco.
General. We define net sales as gross sales less returns and allowances.
We sometimes refer to net sales as revenue.
From 1997 through 2000, the growth in our consolidated net sales was due
in large part to the growth of Pulse. However, beginning in late 2000, the
electronics markets served by Pulse experienced a severe global contraction. In
late 2002, many of these markets began to stabilize or increase in terms of unit
sales. However, because of excess capacity, relocation by customers from North
America and Europe to the Far East, and emergence of strong competitors in the
Far East, the pricing environment for Pulse's products has been and remains
challenging, preventing total revenue from growing proportionately with unit
growth. Pulse has undertaken a series of cost-reduction actions from 2001
through 2004 to optimize its capacity with market conditions.
Since late 2000 and continuing through late 2003, the market in both North
America and Europe for AMI Doduco's products has been weak. The markets in both
North America and Europe have begun to recover in 2004. Demand at AMI Doduco
typically mirrors the prevailing economic conditions in North America and
Europe. This is true for electrical contacts, and for component subassemblies
for automotive applications such as multi-function switches, motor control
sensors and ignition security systems, and for non-automotive uses such as
appliance and industrial controls. AMI Doduco continues its cost reduction
actions including work force adjustments and plant consolidations in line with
demand around the world in order to optimize efficiency.
Historically, the gross margin at Pulse has been significantly higher than
at AMI Doduco. As a result, the mix of net sales generated by Pulse and AMI
Doduco during a period affects our consolidated gross margin. Over the past two
years, our gross margin has been positively impacted by the savings from our
various restructuring activities and ongoing cost and expense controls. Our
gross margin is also significantly affected by capacity utilization,
particularly at AMI Doduco. Pulse's markets are characterized by a relatively
short-term product life cycle compared to AMI Doduco. As a result, significant
product turnover occurs each year. Therefore, Pulse's changes in average selling
prices do not necessarily provide a meaningful and quantifiable measure of
Pulse's operations. AMI Doduco has a relatively long-term and mature product
line, without significant turnover, and with less frequent variation in the
prices of product sold. Most of AMI Doduco's products are sold under annual (or
longer) purchase contracts. Therefore, AMI Doduco's revenues historically have
not been subject to significant price fluctuations. In addition, sales growth
and contraction at AMI Doduco and Pulse's Consumer Division are generally
attributable to changes in unit volume and changes in unit pricing, as well as
foreign exchange rates, especially the U.S. dollar to the euro.
Acquisitions. Historically, acquisitions have been an important part of
our growth strategy. In many cases, our move into new product lines and
extensions of our existing product lines or markets has been facilitated by an
acquisition. Our acquisitions continually change the mix of our net sales. Pulse
made numerous acquisitions in recent years which have increased our penetration
into our primary markets and expanded our presence in new markets. Recent
examples of these acquisitions include the consumer electronics business of
Eldor Corporation and Excelsus.
Page 12 of 32
Pulse acquired Eldor's consumer electronics business in January 2003 for
approximately $83.9 million and this became the Pulse Consumer Division, and is
headquartered in Senna Comasco, Italy with production operations in Istanbul and
Izmir, Turkey. The Consumer Division business is a leading supplier of flyback
transformers to the European television industry. Excelsus was acquired in
August 2001 for approximately $85.9 million, net of cash acquired. Excelsus was
based in Carlsbad, California, and was a leading producer of customer-premises
digital subscriber line filters and other broadband accessories. It is now a
core part of Pulse's telecommunications product division.
Similarly, AMI Doduco has made a number of acquisitions over the years. In
January 2001, AMI Doduco acquired the electrical contact and materials business
of Engelhard-CLAL, a manufacturer of electrical contacts, wire and strip contact
materials and related products. Generally, AMI Doduco's acquisitions have been
driven by our strategy of expanding our product and geographical market presence
for electrical contact products. Due to our integration of acquisitions and the
interchangeable sources of net sales between existing and acquired operations,
historically we have not separately tracked the net sales of an acquisition
after the date of the transaction.
Technology. Our business is continually affected by changes in technology,
design, and preferences of consumers and other end users of our products, as
well as changes in regulatory requirements. We address these changes by
continuing to invest in new product development and by maintaining a diverse
product portfolio which contains both mature and emerging technologies in order
to meet customer demands.
Management Focus. Our executives focus on a number of important factors in
evaluating our financial condition and operation performance. We use economic
profit which we define as operating profit after tax, less our cost of capital.
Revenue growth, gross margin as a percentage of revenue, and operating profit as
a percent of revenue are also among these factors. Operating leverage or
incremental operating profit as a percentage of incremental sales is a factor
that is discussed frequently with analysts and investors, as this is believed to
represent the benefit of absorbing fixed overhead and operating expenses, and
increased profitability on higher sales. In evaluating working capital
management, liquidity and cash flow, our executives also use performance
measures such as days sales outstanding, days payable outstanding and inventory
turnover.
The continued success of our business is largely dependent on meeting and
exceeding our customers' expectations. Non-financial performance measures such
as safety statistics, on-time delivery and quality statistics assist our
management in monitoring this activity on an on-going basis.
Cost Reduction Programs. During 1999 and 2000, the electronic components
industries served by Pulse were characterized by unprecedented growth. Beginning
in late 2000 and continuing all during 2001 and a significant part of 2002,
however, these markets experienced a severe worldwide contraction and many of
our customers canceled orders and decreased their level of business activity as
a result of lower demand for their end products. Our manufacturing business
model for Pulse's non-consumer markets has a very high variable cost component
due to the labor-intensity of many processes, which allows us to quickly change
our capacity based on market demand. Just as we expanded capacity during 1999
and 2000, we reduced capacity during 2001 and 2002. The Pulse Consumer Division,
acquired from Eldor in 2003, however, is capital intensive and therefore more
sensitive to volume changes. Generally speaking, since 2003, Pulse's end markets
experienced increased unit demand, but the increasing presence of Far Eastern
competition also increased pricing pressure, which in turn put pressure on Pulse
to reduce selling prices. Unit sales and pricing pressures were, however, not
uniform across all product lines, making product mix an important factor in
revenue generation. While the electrical contact industry served by AMI Doduco
is generally less dependent on volatile technology markets, it too was
negatively impacted by general economic trends as reflected in slower
non-residential construction spending and reduced capital spending in 2001 and
2002. AMI Doduco has a higher fixed cost component of manufacturing activity
than Pulse, as it is more capital intensive. Therefore, AMI Doduco is unable to
expand or contract its capacity as quickly as Pulse in response to market
demand, although significant actions have been taken to align AMI Doduco's
capacity with current market demand.
As a result of our continuing focus on both economic and operating profit,
we will continue to aggressively size both Pulse and AMI Doduco so that costs
are optimally matched to current and anticipated future revenue and unit demand.
We will also continue to pursue additional growth opportunities. The amounts of
additional charges will depend on specific actions taken. The actions taken over
the past three years such as plant closures, plant relocations, asset
impairments and reduction in personnel worldwide have resulted in the
elimination of a variety of costs. The majority of these costs represent the
annual salaries and benefits of terminated employees, both those
Page 13 of 32
directly related to manufacturing and those providing selling, general and
administrative services, as well as lower overhead costs related to factory
relocations to lower-cost locations. The eliminated costs also include
depreciation savings from disposed equipment. We have implemented a succession
of cost reduction initiatives and programs, summarized as follows:
During 2001, we announced the closure of our production facilities in
Thailand and Malaysia. The production at these two facilities was transferred to
other Pulse facilities in Asia. We recorded charges of $3.6 million for these
plant closings, comprised of $2.5 million for severance and related payments and
$1.1 million for other exit costs. The majority of this accrual was utilized by
the end of 2002. We also adopted other restructuring plans during 2001. In this
regard, provisions of $6.4 million were recorded during 2001. Termination costs
for employees at our Thailand and Malaysian facilities were included in the
separate provisions for exiting those facilities. In addition to these
terminations, headcount was reduced by approximately 12,300, net of new hires,
during fiscal 2001 through voluntary employee attrition and involuntary
workforce reductions primarily at manufacturing facilities in the People's
Republic of China ("PRC") where severance payments are not necessary. In
addition, a charge of $3.5 million was recorded during 2001 to writedown the
value of certain Pulse fixed assets to their disposal value.
During 2002, we announced the closure of our production facility in the
Philippines. The production at this facility was transferred to other Pulse
facilities in Asia. We recorded charges of $3.8 million for this plant closing,
comprising $1.4 million for severance and related payments and $2.4 million for
asset writedowns. The majority of this accrual was utilized by the end of 2002.
We also adopted other restructuring plans during 2002. In this regard, we
recorded provisions of $6.0 million for personnel reductions, and substantially
all of the employee severance and related payments in connection with these
actions were completed as of December 26, 2003. An additional provision of $7.0
million was recorded in 2002 related to asset writedowns. These assets were
primarily Asian-based production equipment that became idle in 2002.
During 2003, we accrued $9.0 million in the aggregate for severance and
related payments and asset impairments. At Pulse, we accrued $1.5 million for
the elimination of certain manufacturing and support positions located in
France, the United Kingdom, Mexico and the PRC and $0.7 million for other
facility exit costs. We additionally accrued $1.9 million for shutdown of
Pulse's manufacturing facility in Mexico and $0.5 million to write down the
carrying cost of Pulse's facility in the Philippines which is held for sale. At
AMI Doduco, we accrued $2.9 million for the elimination of certain manufacturing
positions principally located in North America and Germany and $1.5 million to
complete the shutdown of a redundant facility in Spain that we acquired from
Engelhard-CLAL in 2001. The majority of these accruals were utilized by the end
of 2003.
In 2004, we accrued $4.3 million for severance and related payments
comprised of $2.5 million related to the termination of personnel primarily at
AMI Doduco's facility in Germany, and $0.7 million related to Pulse's shutdown
of a facility in Carlsbad, California, $0.8 million related to AMI Doduco's
shutdown of a facility in France, and $0.3 million for other severance in
various locations. The vast majority of these accruals will be utilized by
October 1, 2004.
International Operations. As of June 25, 2004, we had manufacturing
operations in 10 countries and had no significant net sales in currencies other
than the U.S. dollar and the euro. An increasing percentage of our sales in
recent years have been outside of the United States. In the year ended December
26, 2003, 76% of our net sales were outside of the U.S. Changing exchange rates
often impact our financial results and our period-over-period comparisons. This
is particularly true of movements in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar
and the euro. AMI Doduco's European sales are denominated primarily in euro. AMI
Doduco's and the Pulse Consumer Division's euro-denominated sales and earnings
may result in higher or lower dollar sales and net earnings upon translation for
our U.S. consolidated financial statements. We may also experience a positive or
negative translation adjustment to equity because our investment in Pulse's
Consumer Division and AMI Doduco's European operations may be worth more or less
in U.S. dollars after translation for our U. S. consolidated financial
statements. The Pulse non-consumer operations may incur foreign currency gains
or losses as euro-denominated transactions are remeasured to U.S. dollars for
financial reporting purposes. If an increasing percentage of our sales is
denominated in non-U.S. currencies, increased exposure to currency fluctuations
may result.
In order to reduce our exposure resulting from currency fluctuations, we
may purchase currency exchange forward contracts and/or currency options. These
contracts guarantee a predetermined range of exchange rates at the time the
contract is purchased. This allows us to shift the majority of the risk of
currency fluctuations from the date of the contract to a third party for a fee.
As of June 25, 2004, we had one foreign currency forward contract outstanding
Page 14 of 32
to sell forward approximately 61.5 million euros in order to hedge intercompany
loans. In determining the use of forward exchange contracts and currency
options, we consider the amount of sales, purchases and net assets or
liabilities denominated in local currencies, the type of currency, and the costs
associated with the contracts.
Precious Metals. AMI Doduco uses silver, as well as other precious metals,
in manufacturing some of its electrical contacts, contact materials and contact
subassemblies. Historically, we have leased or held these materials through
consignment arrangements with our suppliers. Leasing and consignment costs have
typically been below the costs to borrow funds to purchase the metals, and more
importantly, these arrangements eliminate the effects of fluctuations in the
market price of owned precious metal and enable us to minimize our inventories.
AMI Doduco's terms of sale generally allow us to charge customers for precious
metal content based on market value of precious metal on the day after shipment
to the customer. Thus far we have been successful in managing the costs
associated with our precious metals. While limited amounts are purchased for use
in production, the majority of our precious metal inventory continues to be
leased or held on consignment. If our leasing/consignment fees increase
significantly in a short period of time, and we are unable to recover these
increased costs through higher sale prices, a negative impact on our results of
operations and liquidity may result. Leasing/consignment fee increases are
caused by increases in interest rates or volatility in the price of the
consigned material.
Income Taxes. Our effective income tax rate is affected by the proportion
of our income earned in high-tax jurisdictions such as Germany and the income
earned in low-tax jurisdictions, particularly Izmir, Turkey and the People's
Republic of China. This mix of income can vary significantly from one period to
another. We have benefited over recent years from favorable tax treatments
outside of the U.S. However, there is no guarantee as to how long these benefits
will continue to exist.
Except in limited circumstances, we have not provided for U.S. federal
income and foreign withholding taxes on our non-U.S. subsidiaries' undistributed
earnings as per Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 23, Accounting for
Income Taxes - Special Areas. Such earnings include pre-acquisition earnings of
foreign entities acquired through stock purchases, and are intended to be
reinvested outside of the U.S. indefinitely. We have not provided for U.S.
federal income and foreign withholding taxes on approximately $299.4 million of
our non-U.S. subsidiaries' undistributed earnings (as calculated for income tax
purposes) as of December 26, 2003, as per APB 23. Unrecognized deferred taxes on
these undistributed earnings are estimated to be approximately $94.2 million.
Where excess cash has accumulated in our non-U.S. subsidiaries and it is
advantageous for tax reasons, subsidiary earnings may be repatriated.
Page 15 of 32
Results of Operations
Three months ended June 25, 2004 compared to the three months ended June
27, 2003
Net Sales. Net sales for the three months ended June 25, 2004 increased
$21.3 million, or 16.9%, to $147.0 million from $125.7 million in the three
months ended June 27, 2003. Our sales increase from the comparable period last
year was primarily attributable to improvement in the market conditions for both
Pulse and AMI Doduco. Pulse's increase in net sales was due to stronger demand
in networking, telecommunications, power conversion, military/aerospace and
consumer markets. AMI Doduco's increase in net sales was due to higher prices
for precious metals and favorable translation effect of a stronger euro, as well
as early successes in AMI Doduco's efforts to increase its market share,
particularly in North America. The sales improvements were offset somewhat by
price adjustments related to new long-term contracts with major customers.
Pulse's net sales increased $9.7 million, or 13.5%, to $81.5 million for
the three months ended June 25, 2004 from $71.8 million in the three months
ended June 27, 2003. This increase was experienced in Pulse's networking,
telecommunications, power conversion, military/aerospace and consumer division
markets on a worldwide basis. In addition, sales derived from the consumer
division are denominated in euros and therefore experienced a favorable
translation effect of a stronger euro in the 2004 period.
AMI Doduco's net sales increased $11.6 million, or 21.5%, to $65.5 million
for the three months ended June 25, 2004 from $53.9 million in the three months
ended June 27, 2003. Sales in the 2004 period reflect improving demand in North
America, particularly in the commercial and industrial markets, whereas European
markets were marginally higher. The sales benefited from an increase in the
average euro-to-U.S. dollar exchange rate and higher prices for precious metals
which were passed on to customers. The higher average euro-to-dollar exchange
rate during 2004 versus the comparable 2003 quarter increased sales by
approximately $2.5 million in the three months ended June 25, 2004.
Cost of Sales. As a result of higher sales, our cost of sales increased
$14.5 million, or 15.6%, to $107.4 million for the three months ended June 25,
2004 from $92.9 million for the three months ended June 27, 2003. Our
consolidated gross margin for the three months ended June 25, 2004 was 26.9%
compared to 26.1% for the three months ended June 27, 2003. Our consolidated
gross margin in 2004 was positively affected by better capacity utilization at
Pulse and AMI Doduco in 2004 compared to 2003.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Total selling, general and
administrative expenses for the three months ended June 25, 2004 increased $3.9
million, or 15.8%, to $28.4 million, or 19.4% of net sales, from $24.6 million,
or 19.5% net of sales for the three months ended June 27, 2003. Increased
spending was a result of increased variable costs such as selling commissions,
incentives and stock compensation expense, partially offset by restructuring
actions that we took over the last year to reduce costs and tighten spending
controls. Incentive and stock compensation expense, in particular, was $1.5
million higher in 2004 versus the comparable period in 2003. European expenses
that are denominated in euros also translated to a higher level of U.S. dollars
at the higher average dollar-to-euro exchange rate in 2004.
Research, development and engineering expenses are included in selling,
general and administrative expenses. We refer to research, development and
engineering expenses as RD&E. For the three months ended June 25, 2004 and June
27, 2003 respectively, RD&E by segment was as follows (dollars in thousands):
2004 2003
---- ----
Pulse $4,682 $3,575
Percentage of segment sales 5.8% 5.0%
AMI Doduco $ 976 $ 972
Percentage of segment sales 1.5% 1.8%
Page 16 of 32
Higher RD&E spending in 2004 at Pulse includes additional investments in
our China Development Center to meet demand from the growing number of
China-based customers as well as multinational customers relocating operations
to China. We believe that future sales in the electronic components markets will
be driven by next-generation products. Design and development activities with
our OEM customers continued at an aggressive pace during 2003 and into 2004.
Interest. Net interest expense was $0.2 million for the three months ended
June 25, 2004 compared to net interest expense of $0.3 million for the three
months ended June 27, 2003. The average balance of invested cash in 2004 over
the comparable period in 2003, was offset somewhat by a lower interest income
yield, resulting in slightly lower net interest expense. Recurring components of
interest expense (silver leasing fees, interest on bank debt and bank commitment
fees) approximated those of 2003.
Other Income. Other income (expense) was $1.3 million of income for the
three months ended June 25, 2004 versus $0.4 million of expense for the three
months ended June 27, 2003. The increase in 2004 is primarily attributable to
$1.1 million gain related to the sale of equity rights arising for the 2001
acquisition of the Engelhard-CLAL electrical contacts business.
Income Taxes. The effective income tax rate for the three months ended
June 25, 2004 was 16.2% compared to 17.4% for the three months ended June 27,
2003. The lower tax rate in 2004 resulted from a lower proportion of income
being attributable to high-tax jurisdictions partially offset by the imposition
of withholding tax in Turkey related to Pulse's Consumer Division.
Six months ended June 25, 2004 compared to the six months ended June 27,
2003
Net Sales. Net sales for the six months ended June 25, 2004 increased
$38.3 million, or 15.4%, to $286.6 million from $248.3 million in the six months
ended June 27, 2003. Our sales increase from the comparable period last year was
attributable to improvement in the markets for both Pulse and AMI Doduco.
Pulse's increase in net sales was due to stronger demand in networking,
telecommunications, power conversion, military/aerospace and consumer markets.
AMI Doduco's increase in net sales was due to higher prices for precious metals
and favorable translation effect of a stronger euro, as well as early successes
in AMI Doduco's efforts to increase its market share, particularly in North
America. The sales improvements were offset somewhat by continuing weakness in
European automotive market and price adjustments related to new long-term
contracts with major customers.
Pulse's net sales increased $19.3 million, or 13.9%, to $159.7 million for
the six months ended June 25, 2004 from $139.6 million in the six months ended
June 27, 2003. This increase was experienced in Pulse's networking,
telecommunications, power conversion, military/aerospace and consumer division
markets on a worldwide basis. In addition, sales derived from the consumer
division are denominated in euros and therefore experienced a favorable
translation effect of a stronger euro.
AMI Doduco's net sales increased $19.0 million, or 17.5%, to $127.6
million for the six months ended June 25, 2004 from $108.6 million in the six
months ended June 27, 2003. Sales in the 2004 period reflect improving demand in
North America, particularly in the commercial and industrial markets, whereas
European markets were flat to down, particularly in the automotive sector. The
sales benefited from an increase in the average euro-to-U.S. dollar exchange
rate and higher prices for precious metals which were passed on to customers.
The higher average euro-to-dollar exchange rate during 2004 versus the
comparable 2003 six months increased sales by approximately $8.5 million in the
six months ended June 25, 2004.
Cost of Sales. As a result of higher net sales, our cost of sales
increased $23.9 million, or 12.9%, to $208.9 million for the six months ended
June 25, 2004 from $185.0 million for the six months ended June 27, 2003. Our
consolidated gross margin for the six months ended June 25, 2004 was 27.1%
compared to 25.5% for the six months ended June 27, 2003. Our consolidated gross
margin in 2004 was positively affected by better capacity utilization at Pulse
and AMI Doduco in 2004 compared to 2003.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Total selling, general and
administrative expenses for the six months ended June 25, 2004 increased $7.8
million, or 16.2%, to $56.1 million, or 19.6% of net sales, from $48.3 million,
or 19.5% net of sales for the six months ended June 27, 2003. Increased spending
was a result of increased variable costs such as selling commissions, incentives
and stock compensation expense, partially offset by
Page 17 of 32
restructuring actions that we took over the last year to reduce costs and
tighten spending controls. Incentive and stock compensation expense, in
particular, was $2.2 million higher in 2004 versus the comparable period in
2003. European expenses that are denominated in euros also translated to a
higher level of U. S. dollars at the higher euro-to-dollar exchange rate in
2004.
Research, development and engineering expenses are included in selling,
general and administrative expenses. We refer to research, development and
engineering expenses as RD&E. For the six months ended June 25, 2004 and June
27, 2003 respectively, RD&E by segment was as follows (dollars in thousands):
2004 2003
---- ----
Pulse $9,289 $6,931
Percentage of segment sales 5.8% 5.0%
AMI Doduco $2,045 $2,019
Percentage of segment sales 1.6% 1.9%
Higher RD&E spending in 2004 at Pulse includes additional investments in
our China Development Center. We believe that future sales in the electronic
components markets will be driven by next-generation products. Design and
development activities with our OEM customers continued at an aggressive pace
during 2003 and into 2004.
Interest. Net interest expense was $0.3 million for the six months ended
June 25, 2004 compared to net interest expense of $0.5 million for the six
months ended June 27, 2003. The average higher balance of invested cash in 2004
over the comparable period in 2003, was offset somewhat by a lower interest
income yield, resulting in slightly lower net interest expense. Recurring
components of interest expense (silver leasing fees, interest on bank debt and
bank commitment fees) approximated those of 2003.
Other Income. Other income (expense) was $0.6 million of income for the
six months ended June 25, 2004 versus $0.5 million of expense for the six months
ended June 27, 2003. The increase in 2004 is primarily attributable to $1.1
million gain related to the sale of equity rights arising for the 2001
acquisition of the Engelhard-CLAL electrical contacts business.
Income Taxes. The effective income tax rate for the six months ended June
25, 2004 was 16.1% compared to 13.7% for the six months ended June 27, 2003. The
higher tax rate in 2004 resulted from a higher proportion of income being
attributable to high-tax jurisdictions and an imposition of withholding tax in
Turkey related to the consumer division.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Working capital as of June 25, 2004 was $218.4 million compared to $199.8
million as of December 26, 2003. This increase was primarily due to the increase
in cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, and inventories, offset
slightly by an increase in accrued expenses. Cash and cash equivalents, which is
included in working capital, increased from $143.4 million as of December 26,
2003 to $154.0 million as of June 25, 2004.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $17.0 million for the six
months ended June 25, 2004 and $14.2 million in the comparable period of 2003,
an increase of $2.8 million. This increase is primarily attributable to higher
net earnings during the six months ended June 25, 2004, partially offset by
increases in net working capital.
We present our statement of cash flows using the indirect method as
permitted under Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 95, Statement
of Cash Flows. Our management has found that investors and analysts typically
refer to changes in accounts receivable, inventory, and other components of
working capital when analyzing operating cash flows. Also, changes in working
capital are more directly related to the way we manage our business for cash
flow than are items such as cash receipts from the sale of goods, as would
appear using the direct method.
Page 18 of 32
Capital expenditures were $3.9 million during the six months ended June
25, 2004 and $3.5 million in the comparable period of 2003. We make capital
expenditures to expand production capacity, improve our operating efficiency,
and enhance workplace safety. We plan to continue making such expenditures in
the future as and when necessary.
We used $4.0 million net of cash acquired for acquisitions during the six
months ended June 25, 2004. This expenditure related to the acquisition by Pulse
of a plastics fabrication operation in the People's Republic of China. We used
$81.9 million cash for acquisitions in the comparable period of 2003 related to
the acquisition of Eldor. Subsequent to June 25, 2004, we increased our equity
interest in FRE to 48%, and may further increase our interest in the future. The
additional purchase of FRE common shares in July 2004 cost $8.5 million. We may
acquire other businesses or product lines to expand our breadth and scope of
operations. We may also exercise our option to expand our investment in FRE
during 2004.
We do not pay cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to
retain future earnings to finance the growth of our business.
We entered into a new credit agreement on June 17, 2004 providing for
$125.0 million of credit capacity. The facility consists of an aggregate U.S.
dollar-equivalent revolving line of credit in the principal amount of up to
$125.0 million, which provides for borrowings in multiple currencies including
but not limited to U.S. dollars and euros, including individual sub-limits of:
- a U.S. dollar based swingline loan not to exceed $10.0 million; and
- a multicurrency facility providing for the issuance of letters of credit
in an aggregate amount not to exceed the U.S. dollar equivalent of $15.0
million.
The credit agreement permits us to request one or more increases in the
total commitment not to exceed $75.0 million, provided the minimum increase is
$25.0 million, subject to bank approval.
The amounts outstanding under the credit facility in total may not exceed
$125.0 million, provided we do not request an increase in total commitment as
noted above. In any event, outstanding borrowings are limited to a maximum of
three times our earnings before interest, taxes depreciation and amortization
(EBITDA) on a rolling twelve-month basis as of the most recent quarter-end.
The credit facility contains covenants specifying a maximum debt to EBITDA
ratio, as defined above, minimum interest expense coverage, capital expenditure
limitations, and other customary and normal provisions. We are in compliance
with all such covenants. As of June 25, 2004, we have no outstanding borrowings
under our existing three-year revolving credit agreement.
We pay a commitment fee on the unborrowed portion of the commitment, which
ranges from 0.175% to 0.300% of the total commitment, depending on our debt to
EBITDA ratio, as defined above. The interest rate for each currency's borrowing
will be a combination of the base rate for that currency plus a credit margin
spread. The base rate is different for each currency. The credit margin spread
is the same for each currency and is 0.750% to 1.500% depending on our debt to
EBITDA ratio, as defined above. Each of our domestic subsidiaries with net worth
equal to or greater than $5 million guarantees all obligations incurred under
the credit facility.
We also have an obligation outstanding due in August 2009 under an
unsecured term loan agreement with Sparkasse Pforzheim, for the borrowing of
approximately 5.1 million euros.
We had three standby letters of credit outstanding at June 25, 2004 in the
aggregate amount of $1.3 million securing transactions entered into in the
ordinary course of business.
We had commercial commitments outstanding at June 25, 2004 of
approximately $66.3 million due under precious metal consignment-type leases.
This represents an increase of $5.7 million from the $60.6 million outstanding
as of December 26, 2003 and is attributable to volume increases and to a lesser
extent, higher average silver prices during 2004.
We believe that the combination of cash on hand, cash generated by
operations and, if necessary, additional borrowings under our credit agreement
will be sufficient to satisfy our operating cash requirements in the foreseeable
Page 19 of 32
future. In addition, we may use internally generated funds or borrowings, or
additional equity offerings for acquisitions of suitable businesses or assets.
All retained earnings are free of legal or contractual restrictions as of
June 25, 2004, with the exception of approximately $13.0 million of retained
earnings primarily in the PRC, that are restricted in accordance with Section 58
of the PRC Foreign Investment Enterprises Law. The amount restricted in
accordance with the PRC Foreign Investment Enterprise Law is for employee
welfare programs and is applicable to all foreign investment enterprises doing
business in the PRC. The restriction applies to 10% of our net earnings in the
PRC, limited to 50% of the total capital invested in the PRC. We have not
experienced any significant liquidity restrictions in any country in which we
operate and none are foreseen. However, foreign exchange ceilings imposed by
local governments and the sometimes-lengthy approval processes which some
foreign governments require for international cash transfers may delay our
internal cash movements from time to time. The retained earnings in other
countries represent a material portion of our assets. We expect to reinvest
these earnings outside of the United States because we anticipate that a
significant portion of our opportunities for growth in the coming years will be
abroad. If these earnings were brought back to the United States, significant
tax liabilities could be incurred in the United States as several countries in
which we operate have rates significantly lower than the U.S. statutory rate.
Additionally, we have not accrued U.S. income taxes on foreign earnings
indefinitely invested abroad.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board "FASB" issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 132 (revised 2003), Employers'
Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits, an amendment of
FASB Statements No. 87, 88, and 106, and a revision of FASB Statement No. 132
("SFAS 132R"). SFAS 132R revises employers' disclosures about pension plans and
other postretirement benefit plans. It does not change the measurement or
recognition of those plans required by SFAS No. 87, Employers' Accounting for
Pensions, SFAS No. 88, Employers' Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of
Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits, and SFAS No. 106,
Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions. The new
rules require additional disclosures about the assets, obligations, cash flows,
and net periodic benefit cost of defined benefit pension plans and other
postretirement benefit plans. The required information will be provided
separately for pension plans and for other postretirement benefit plans. The new
disclosures are effective for fiscal 2003 year-end financial statements and
certain interim disclosures in 2004. Adoption of this standard did not have any
effect on our revenue, operating results, financial position or liquidity.
In December 2003, FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (revised December
2003) Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities ("FIN 46R"). FIN 46R clarifies
the application of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial
Statements, to certain entities in which equity investors do not have the
characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient
equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional
subordinated financial support from other parties. FIN 46R replaces FASB
Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities which was
issued in January 2003. We were required to apply FIN 46R to variable interest
in variable interest entities created after December 31, 2003. For variable
interests in variable interest entities created before January 1, 2004, the
final interpretation was required to be applied no later than the end of the
first reporting period that ends after March 15, 2004. We do not have any
variable interests or variable interest entities and the adoption of this
interpretation did not have a material effect on our revenue, operating results,
financial position, or liquidity.
In April 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities ("SFAS 149"), which amends and clarifies financial accounting and
reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments
embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities under SFAS 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS 149 requires
that contracts with comparable characteristics be accounted for similarly and
clarifies under what circumstances a contract with an initial net investment
meets the characteristic of a derivative and when a derivative contains a
financing component. SFAS 149 also amends the definition of an underlying to
conform it to language used in FIN No. 45, Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of
Others. SFAS 149 is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June
30, 2003, with certain exceptions. We adopted SFAS. 149 as of June 1, 2003, and
the adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our revenue,
operating results, financial position or liquidity.
Page 20 of 32
Factors That May Affect Our Future Results (Cautionary Statements for Purposes
of the "Safe Harbor" Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995)
Our disclosures and analysis in this report contain forward-looking
statements. Forward-looking statements reflect our current expectations of
future events or future financial performance. You can identify these statements
by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts.
They often use words such as "anticipate", "estimate", "expect", "project",
"intend", "plan", "believe", and similar terms. These forward-looking statements
are based on our current plans and expectations.
Any or all of our forward-looking statements in this report may prove to
be incorrect. They may be affected by inaccurate assumptions we might make or by
risks and uncertainties which are either unknown or not fully known or
understood. Accordingly, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from
what is expressed or forecasted in this report.
We sometimes provide forecasts of future financial performance. The risks
and uncertainties described under "Risk Factors" as well as other risks
identified from time to time in other Securities and Exchange Commission
reports, registration statements and public announcements, among others, should
be considered in evaluating our prospects for the future. We undertake no
obligation to release updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement,
whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Risk Factors
Cyclical changes in the markets we serve could result in a significant decrease
in demand for our products and reduce our profitability.
Our components are used in various products for the electronic and
electrical equipment markets. These markets are highly cyclical. The demand for
our components reflects the demand for products in the electronic and electrical
equipment markets generally. Beginning in late 2000 and continuing into 2003,
these markets, particularly the electronics market, experienced a severe
worldwide contraction. This contraction resulted in a decrease in demand for our
products, as our customers:
o canceled many existing orders;
o introduced fewer new products; and
o worked to decrease their inventory levels.
The decrease in demand for our products had a significant adverse effect
on our operating results and profitability. While these markets have recovered
to varying degrees over the last year, we cannot predict the duration or
strength of any recovery. Accordingly, we may continue to experience volatility
in both our revenues and profits.
Reduced prices for our products may adversely affect our profit margins if we
are unable to reduce our costs of production.
The average selling prices for our products tend to decrease over their
life cycle. In addition, the recent economic contraction has significantly
increased the pressure on our customers to seek lower prices from their
suppliers. As a result, our customers are likely to continue to demand lower
prices from us. To maintain our margins and remain profitable, we must continue
to meet our customers' design needs while reducing costs through efficient raw
material procurement and process and product improvements. Our profit margins
will suffer if we are unable to reduce our costs of production as sales prices
decline.
An inability to adequately respond to changes in technology may decrease our
sales.
Pulse operates in an industry characterized by rapid change caused by the
frequent emergence of new technologies. Generally, we expect life cycles for our
products in the electronic components industry to be relatively short. This
requires us to anticipate and respond rapidly to changes in industry standards
and customer needs and to develop and introduce new and enhanced products on a
timely and cost effective basis. Our engineering and development teams place a
priority on working closely with our customers to design innovative products and
improve our manufacturing processes. Our inability to react to changes in
technology quickly and efficiently may decrease our sales and profitability.
Page 21 of 32
If our inventories become obsolete, our future performance and operating results
will be adversely affected.
The life cycles of our products depend heavily upon the life cycles of the
end products into which our products are designed. Many of Pulse's products have
very short life cycles which are measured in quarters. Products with short life
cycles require us to closely manage our production and inventory levels.
Inventory may become obsolete because of adverse changes in end market demand.
During market slowdowns, this may result in significant charges for inventory
write-offs, as was the case during 2001. Our future operating results may be
adversely affected by material levels of obsolete or excess inventories.
An inability to capitalize on our recent or future acquisitions may adversely
affect our business.
In recent years we have completed several acquisitions. We continually
seek acquisitions to grow our business. We may fail to derive significant
benefits from our acquisitions. In addition, if we fail to achieve sufficient
financial performance from an acquisition, goodwill and other intangibles could
become impaired, resulting in our recognition of a loss. In 2002, we recorded a
goodwill impairment charge of $15.7 million related to AMI Doduco and a trade
name impairment charge of $32.1 million related to Pulse. In 2003, we recorded
an equity method investment loss of $8.7 million related to our investment in
FRE. The degree of success of any of our acquisitions depends on our ability to:
o successfully integrate or consolidate acquired operations into our
existing businesses;
o identify and take advantage of cost reduction opportunities; and
o further penetrate the markets for the product capabilities acquired.
Integration of acquisitions may take longer than we expect and may never
be achieved to the extent originally anticipated. This could result in slower
than anticipated business growth or higher than anticipated costs. In addition,
acquisitions may:
o cause a disruption in our ongoing business;
o distract our managers;
o unduly burden our other resources; and
o result in an inability to maintain our historical standards,
procedures and controls.
Integration of acquisitions into the acquiring segment may limit the ability of
investors to track the performance of individual acquisitions and to analyze
trends in our operating results.
Our historical practice has been to quickly integrate acquisitions into
the existing business of the acquiring segment and to report financial
performance on the segment level. As a result of this practice, we do not
separately track the stand-alone performance of acquisitions after the date of
the transaction. Consequently, investors cannot quantify the financial
performance and success of any individual acquisition or the financial
performance and success of a particular segment excluding the impact of
acquisitions. In addition, our practice of quickly integrating acquisitions into
the financial performance of each segment may limit the ability of investors to
analyze any trends in our operating results over time.
An inability to identify additional acquisition opportunities may slow our
future growth.
We intend to continue to identify and consummate additional acquisitions
to further diversify our business and to penetrate important markets. We may not
be able to identify suitable acquisition candidates at reasonable prices. Even
if we identify promising acquisition candidates, the timing, price, structure
and success of future acquisitions are uncertain. An inability to consummate
attractive acquisitions may reduce our growth rate and our ability to penetrate
new markets.
Page 22 of 32
If our customers terminate their existing agreements, or do not enter into new
agreements or submit additional purchase orders for our products, our business
will suffer.
Most of our sales are made on a purchase order basis as needed by our
customers. In addition, to the extent we have agreements in place with our
customers, most of these agreements are either short term in nature or provide
our customers with the ability to terminate the arrangement with little or no
prior notice. Our contracts typically do not provide us with any material
recourse in the event of non-renewal or early termination. We will lose business
and our revenues will decrease if a significant number of customers:
o do not submit additional purchase orders;
o do not enter into new agreements with us; or
o elect to terminate their relationship with us.
If we do not effectively manage our business in the face of fluctuations in the
size of our organization, our business may be disrupted.
We have grown rapidly over the last ten years, both organically and as a
result of acquisitions. However, in 2001 and 2002 we significantly reduced our
workforce and facilities in response to a dramatic decrease in demand for our
products due to prevailing global market conditions. These rapid fluctuations
place strains on our resources and systems. If we do not effectively manage our
resources and systems, our business may suffer.
Uncertainty in demand for our products may result in increased costs of
production and an inability to service our customers.
We have very little visibility into our customers' purchasing patterns and
are highly dependent on our customers' forecasts. These forecasts are
non-binding and often highly unreliable. Given the fluctuation in growth rates
and cyclical demand for our products, as well as our reliance on often imprecise
customer forecasts, it is difficult to accurately manage our production
schedule, equipment and personnel needs and our raw material and working capital
requirements. Our failure to effectively manage these issues may result in:
o production delays;
o increased costs of production;
o an inability to make timely deliveries; and
o a decrease in profits.
A decrease in availability or increase in cost of our key raw materials could
adversely affect our profit margins.
We use several types of raw materials in the manufacturing of our
products, including:
o precious metals such as silver;
o base metals such as copper and brass; and
o ferrite cores.
Some of these materials are produced by a limited number of suppliers.
From time to time, we may be unable to obtain these raw materials in sufficient
quantities or in a timely manner to meet the demand for our products. The lack
of availability or a delay in obtaining any of the raw materials used in our
products could adversely affect our manufacturing costs and profit margins. In
addition, if the price of our raw materials increases significantly over a short
period of time, customers may be unwilling to bear the increased price for our
products and we may be forced to sell our products containing these materials at
prices that reduce our profit margins.
Some of our raw materials, such as precious metals, are considered
commodities and are subject to price volatility. We attempt to limit our
exposure to fluctuations in the cost of precious materials, including silver, by
holding the majority of our precious metal inventory through leasing or
consignment arrangements with our suppliers. We then typically purchase the
precious metal from our supplier at the current market price on the day after
delivery to our customer and pass this cost on to our customer. In addition,
leasing and consignment costs have historically been substantially below the
costs to borrow funds to purchase the precious metals. We currently have four
Page 23 of 32
consignment or leasing agreements related to precious metals, all of which
generally have one year terms with varying maturity dates, but can be terminated
by either party with 30 days' prior notice. Our results of operations and
liquidity will be negatively impacted if:
o we are unable to enter into new leasing or consignment arrangements
with similarly favorable terms after our existing agreements
terminate, or
o our leasing or consignment fees increase significantly in a short
period of time and we are unable to recover these increased costs
through higher sale prices.
Fees charged by the consignor are driven by interest rates and the market
price of the consigned material. The market price of the consigned material is
determined by the supply of and the demand for the material. Consignment fees
will increase if interest rates or the price of the consigned material increase.
Competition may result in lower prices for our products and reduced sales.
Both Pulse and AMI Doduco frequently encounter strong competition within
individual product lines from various competitors throughout the world. We
compete principally on the basis of:
o product quality and reliability;
o global design and manufacturing capabilities;
o breadth of product line;
o customer service;
o price; and
o on-time delivery.
Our inability to successfully compete on any or all of the above factors
may result in reduced sales.
Our backlog is not an accurate measure of future revenues and is subject to
customer cancellation.
While our backlog consists of firm accepted orders with an express release
date generally scheduled within six months of the order, many of the orders that
comprise our backlog may be canceled by customers without penalty. It is widely
known that customers in the electronics industry have on occasion double and
triple-ordered components from multiple sources to ensure timely delivery when
quoted lead-time is particularly long. In addition, customers often cancel
orders when business is weak and inventories are excessive, a process that we
experienced in the recent contraction. Although backlog should not be relied on
as an indicator of our future revenues, our results of operations could be
adversely impacted if customers cancel a material portion of orders in our
backlog.
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates may adversely affect our
operating results.
We manufacture and sell our products in various regions of the world and
export and import these products to and from a large number of countries.
Fluctuations in exchange rates could negatively impact our cost of production
and sales that, in turn, could decrease our operating results and cash flow.
Although we engage in limited hedging transactions, including foreign currency
contracts, to reduce our transaction and economic exposure to foreign currency
fluctuations, these measures may not eliminate or substantially reduce our risk
in the future.
Our international operations subject us to the risks of unfavorable political,
regulatory, labor and tax conditions in other countries.
We manufacture and assemble some of our products in foreign locations,
including the PRC, and Turkey. In addition, approximately 76% of our revenues
for the year ended December 26, 2003 were derived from sales to customers
outside the United States. Our future operations and earnings may be adversely
affected by the risks related to, or any other problems arising from, operating
in international markets.
Risks inherent in doing business internationally may include:
o economic and political instability;
o expropriation and nationalization;
o trade restrictions and disruptions;
Page 24 of 32
o capital and exchange control programs;
o transportation delays;
o foreign currency fluctuations; and
o unexpected changes in the laws and policies of the United States or
of the countries in which we operate.
In particular, Pulse has substantially all of its non-consumer
manufacturing operations in the PRC. Our presence in the PRC has enabled Pulse
to maintain lower manufacturing costs and to flexibly adjust our work force to
demand levels for our products. Although the PRC has a large and growing
economy, the potential economic, political, legal and labor developments entail
uncertainties and risks. While the PRC has been receptive to foreign investment,
we cannot be certain that its current policies will continue indefinitely into
the future. In the event of any changes that adversely affect our ability to
conduct our operations within the PRC, our business will suffer. The Pulse
Consumer Division is headquartered in Italy, with substantially all of its
manufacturing operations in Turkey. These operations in Turkey are subject to
unique risks, including those associated with continuing Middle East
geo-political events.
We have benefited over recent years from favorable tax treatment as a
result of our international operations. We operate in foreign countries where we
realize favorable income tax treatment relative to the U.S. statutory rate. We
have also been granted or benefited from special tax incentives in other
countries including the PRC and Turkey. This favorable situation could change if
these countries were to increase rates or revoke the special tax incentives, or
if we discontinue our manufacturing operations in any of these countries and do
not substitute the operations with operations in other locations with favorable
tax incentives. Accordingly, in the event of changes in laws and regulations
affecting our international operations, we may not be able to continue to take
advantage of similar benefits in the future.
Shifting our operations between regions may entail considerable expense.
In the past we have shifted our operations from one region to another in
order to maximize manufacturing and operational efficiency. We may close one or
more additional factories in the future. This could entail significant one-time
earnings charges to account for severance, equipment write-offs or write-downs
and moving expenses. In addition, as we implement transfers of our operations we
may experience disruptions, including strikes or other types of labor unrest
resulting from layoffs or termination of employees.
Liquidity requirements could necessitate movements of existing cash balances
which may be subject to restrictions or cause unfavorable tax and earnings
consequences.
A significant portion of our cash is held offshore by our international
subsidiaries and is predominantly denominated in U.S. dollars. While we intend
to use cash held overseas to fund our international operation and growth, if we
encounter a significant domestic need for liquidity that we cannot fulfill
through borrowings, equity offerings, or other internal or external sources, we
may experience unfavorable tax and earnings consequences if this cash is
transferred to the United States. These adverse consequences would occur if the
transfer of cash into the United States is taxed without sufficient foreign tax
credit to offset the U.S. tax liability, resulting in lower earnings and cash
flow. In addition, we may be prohibited from transferring cash from the PRC.
With the exception of approximately $13.0 million of non-cash retained earnings
as of June 25, 2004 in primarily the PRC that are restricted in accordance with
the PRC Foreign Investment Enterprises Law, substantially all retained earnings
are free from legal or contractual restrictions. The PRC Foreign Investment
Enterprise Law restricts 10% of our net earnings in the PRC, up to a maximum
amount equal to 50% of the total capital we have invested in the PRC. We have
not experienced any significant liquidity restrictions in any country in which
we operate and none are presently foreseen. However, foreign exchange ceilings
imposed by local governments and the sometimes-lengthy approval processes which
some foreign governments require for international cash transfers may delay our
internal cash movements from time to time.
Losing the services of our executive officers or our other highly qualified and
experienced employees could adversely affect our business.
Our success depends upon the continued contributions of our executive
officers and management, many of whom have many years of experience and would be
extremely difficult to replace. We must also attract and maintain experienced
and highly skilled engineering, sales and marketing and managerial personnel.
Competition for qualified personnel is intense in our industries, and we may not
be successful in hiring and retaining these people. If we lose the
Page 25 of 32
services of our executive officers or cannot attract and retain other qualified
personnel, our business could be adversely affected.
Public health epidemics (such as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) or other
natural disasters (such as earthquakes or fires) may disrupt operations in
affected regions and affect operating results.
We maintain extensive manufacturing operations in the PRC and Turkey, as
do many of our customers and suppliers. A sustained interruption of our
manufacturing operations, or those of our customers or suppliers, as a result of
complications from severe acute respiratory syndrome or another public health
epidemic or other natural disasters, could have a material adverse effect on our
business and results of operations.
The unavailability of insurance against certain business risks may adversely
affect our future operating results.
As part of our comprehensive risk management program, we purchase
insurance coverage against certain business risks. If any of our insurance
carriers discontinues an insurance policy and we cannot find another insurance
carrier to write comparable coverage, we may be subject to uninsured losses
which may adversely affect our operating results.
Environmental liability and compliance obligations may affect our operations and
results.
Our manufacturing operations are subject to a variety of environmental
laws and regulations governing:
o air emissions;
o wastewater discharges;
o the storage, use, handling, disposal and remediation of hazardous
substances, wastes and chemicals; and
o employee health and safety.
If violations of environmental laws should occur, we could be held liable
for damages, penalties, fines and remedial actions. Our operations and results
could be adversely affected by any material obligations arising from existing
laws, as well as any required material modifications arising from new
regulations that may be enacted in the future. We may also be held liable for
past disposal of hazardous substances generated by our business or businesses we
acquire. In addition, it is possible that we may be held liable for
contamination discovered at our present or former facilities.
We are aware of contamination at two locations. In Sinsheim, Germany,
there is a shallow groundwater and soil contamination that is naturally
decreasing over time. The German environmental authorities have not required
corrective action to date. In addition, property in Leesburg, Indiana, which was
acquired with our acquisition of GTI in 1998, is the subject of a 1994
Corrective Action Order to GTI by the Indiana Department of Environmental
Management (IDEM). The order requires us to investigate and take corrective
actions. Substantially all of the corrective actions relating to impacted soil
have been taken and IDEM has issued us no further action letters for the
remediated areas. We anticipate making additional environmental expenditures in
future years to continue our environmental studies, analysis and remediation
activities. Based on current knowledge, we do not believe that any future
expenses or liabilities associated with environmental remediation will have a
material impact on our operations or our consolidated financial position,
liquidity or operating results, however, we may be subject to additional costs
and liabilities if the scope of the contamination or the cost of remediation
exceeds our current expectations.
Page 26 of 32
Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
There were no material changes in market risk exposures that affect the
quantitative and qualitative disclosures presented in our Form 10-K for the year
ended December 26, 2003.
Item 4: Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report ("Evaluation Date"), we
evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our "disclosure
controls and procedures" for purposes of filing reports under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"). This evaluation was done under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our
Principal Executive Officer ("PEO") and Principal Financial Officer ("PFO").
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed with the objective of ensuring
that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the
Exchange Act, such as this periodic report on Form 10-Q, is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and
forms. Disclosure controls and procedures are also designed with the objective
of ensuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including the PEO and the PFO, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
Our management, including the PEO and PFO, does not expect that our
disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all error and all fraud. A
control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only
reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system
are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that
there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered
relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control
systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all
control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been
detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in
decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple
human or systems error. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the
individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by
management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls also
is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events,
and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its
stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent
limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or
fraud may occur and not be detected timely, in the ordinary course of business.
We plan to evaluate our disclosure controls and procedures on a quarterly
basis in accordance with the Exchange Act so that the conclusions concerning the
effectiveness of controls can be reported in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q
and our annual reports on Form 10-K. Our disclosure controls and procedures are
also evaluated on an ongoing basis by personnel in our finance organization and
our internal audit group in connection with their audit and review activities.
The overall goals of these various evaluation activities are to monitor our
disclosure controls and procedures over financial reporting and to make
modifications as necessary. Our intent in this regard is that these controls and
procedures will be maintained as dynamic systems that change to include
improvements and corrections as conditions warrant.
Among other matters, we sought in our evaluation to determine whether
there were any "significant deficiencies" or "material weaknesses" in our
internal controls and procedures, and whether we had identified any acts of
fraud involving personnel who have a significant role in our internal controls
and procedures. This information was important both for the controls evaluation
generally and because the PEO and PFO certification requirement under items 5
and 6 of Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 mandates that they
disclose that information to our audit committee and to our independent auditors
and to report on related matters in this section of the quarterly report on Form
10-Q. In the professional auditing literature, "significant deficiencies" are
referred to as "reportable conditions"; that is, those control issues that could
have a significant adverse effect on our ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data in the financial statements. A "material weakness" is
defined in the auditing literature as a particularly serious reportable
condition where the internal control does not reduce to a relatively low level
the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud may occur in amounts that
would be material in relation to the financial statements and not be detected
within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their
assigned functions. We also sought to deal with other internal control matters
Page 27 of 32
in the controls evaluation, and where appropriate, to consider what revision,
improvement and/or correction to make.
Based upon an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation
of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15,
our PEO and PFO have concluded that, subject to the inherent limitations noted
above, as of the Evaluation Date our disclosure controls and procedures are
effective to ensure that material information relating to the company and our
consolidated subsidiaries is made known to management, including the PEO and
PFO, particularly during the period when our periodic reports are being
prepared. There have been no significant changes in internal controls and
procedures or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
and procedures, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Page 28 of 32
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 Legal Proceedings None
Item 2 Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds None
Item 3 Defaults Upon Senior Securities None
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on May 19, 2004. Messrs.
David H. Hofmann, and Edward M. Mazze were elected to a three-year term
as directors of the Company. The results of the votes were as follows:
For Withhold Authority
--- ------------------
David H. Hofmann 34,476,260 513,355
Edward M. Mazze 34,317,575 672,040
In addition, each of the following directors continued in office after
the meeting: Alan E. Barton, John E. Burrows, Jr., Graham Humes, James
M. Papada, III, and C. Mark Melliar-Smith.
Item 5 Other Information None
Item 6 Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits
The Exhibit Index is on page 30.
(b) Reports On Form 8-K
We filed a current report on Form 8-K dated April 19, 2004. This
report pertains to our press release issued to announce our first
quarter 2004 results.
Page 29 of 32
Exhibit Index
2.1 Share Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 9, 2003, by Pulse
Electronics (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. and Forfin Holdings B.V. that are
signatories thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to our
Form 8-K dated January 10, 2003).
3.1 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Form 10-K for the year ended December
26, 2003)
3.3 By-laws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to our Form 10-K
for the year ended December 27, 2002).
4.1 Rights Agreement, dated as of August 30, 1996, between Technitrol,
Inc. and Registrar and Transfer Company, as Rights Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to our Registration Statement
on Form 8-A dated October 24, 1996).
4.2 Amendment No. 1 to the Rights Agreement, dated March 25, 1998,
between Technitrol, Inc. and Registrar and Transfer Company, as
Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to our
Registration Statement on Form 8-A/A dated April 10, 1998).
4.3 Amendment No. 2 to the Rights Agreement, dated June 15, 2000, between
Technitrol, Inc. and Registrar and Transfer Company, as Rights Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 5 to our Registration Statement
on Form 8-A/A dated July 5, 2000).
10.1 Technitrol, Inc. 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Registration Statement on Form S-8
dated June 28, 2001, File Number 333-64060).
10.2 Technitrol, Inc. Restricted Stock Plan II, as amended and restated as
of January 1, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit C, to our
Definitive Proxy on Schedule 14A dated March 28, 2001).
10.3 Technitrol, Inc. 2001 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to our Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated June 28,
2001, File Number 333-64068).
10.4 Technitrol, Inc. Board of Directors Stock Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Registration Statement on Form S-8
dated June 1, 1998, File Number 333-55751).
10.5 Revolving Credit Agreement, by and among Technitrol, Inc. and certain
of its subsidiaries, JPMorgan Chase Bank. as Agent and Lender, and
certain other Lenders that are signatories thereto, dated as of June
17, 2004.
10.6 Lease Agreement, dated October 15, 1991, between Ridilla-Delmont and
AMI Doduco, Inc. (formerly known as Advanced Metallurgy
Incorporated), as amended September 21, 2001 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Amendment No. 1 to
Registration Statement on Form S-3 dated February 28, 2002, File
Number 333-81286).
10.7 Incentive Compensation Plan of Technitrol, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Amendment No. 1 to our Registration
Statement on Form S-3 filed on February 28, 2002, File Number
333-81286).
10.8 Technitrol, Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan, amended and restated
January 1, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to
Amendment No. 1 to our Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on
February 28, 2002, File Number 333-81286).
Page 30 of 32
Exhibit Index, continued
10.9 Agreement between Technitrol, Inc. and James M. Papada, III, dated
July 1, 1999, as amended April 23, 2001, relating to the Technitrol,
Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.9 to Amendment No. 1 to our Registration Statement on Form
S-3 filed on February 28, 2002, File Number 333-81286).
10.10 Letter Agreement between Technitrol, Inc. and James M. Papada, III,
dated April 16, 1999, as amended October 18, 2000 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Amendment No. 1 to our Registration
Statement on Form S-3 filed on February 28, 2002, File Number
333-81286).
10.10(1) Letter Agreement between Technitrol, Inc. and James M. Papada, III
dated July 1, 2004
10.11 Form of Indemnity Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.11 to our Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2002).
10.12 Technitrol Inc. Supplemental Savings Plan (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.15 to our Form 10-Q for the three months ended
September 26, 2003)
10.13 Technitrol, Inc. 401(K) Retirement Savings Plan, as amended
(incorporated by reference to post-effective Amendment No. 1, to our
Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on October 31, 2003, File
Number 033-35334) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to our
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 26, 2003).
10.14 Pulse Engineering, Inc. 401(K) Plan as amended (incorporated by
reference to post-effective Amendment No. 1, to our Registration
Statement on Form S-8 filed on October 31, 2003, File Number
033-94073) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to our Form
10-Q for the three months ended March 26, 2003).
10.15 Amended and Restated Short-Term Incentive Plan
31.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section
302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section
302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Page 31 of 32
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Technitrol, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------
(Registrant)
July 30, 2004 /s/Drew A. Moyer
------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
(Date) Drew A. Moyer
Vice President, Corporate Controller and Secretary
(duly authorized officer, principal financial and
accounting officer)
Page 32 of 32