What is the purpose of the meeting?

At our annual meeting, shareholders will act upon the matters outlined in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders. These include election of directors; advisory approval of Apogee’s executive compensation (the “Say on Pay Proposal”); and ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm.

Why did I receive a notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?

In accordance with rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we may furnish proxy materials, including this proxy statement and our fiscal 2013 Annual Report to Shareholders, to our shareholders by providing access to such documents on the Internet instead of mailing printed copies. Most shareholders will not receive printed copies of the proxy materials unless they request them. Instead, the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”), which was mailed to most of our shareholders, will instruct you as to how you may access and review all of the proxy materials on the Internet. The Notice also instructs you as to how you may submit your proxy on the Internet. By accessing and reviewing the proxy materials on the Internet, you will save us the cost of printing and mailing these materials to you and reduce the impact of such printing and mailing on the environment. If you would like to receive a paper copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials provided in the Notice.

How do I get electronic access to the proxy materials?

The Notice will provide you with instructions regarding how to view the proxy materials for our annual meeting on the Internet.

Who is entitled to vote at the meeting?

Our Board of Directors has set May 3, 2013 as the record date for the annual meeting. If you were a shareholder of record at the close of business on May 3, 2013, you are entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting.

As of the record date, 28,738,701 shares of common stock, par value $0.33-1/3, were issued and outstanding and, therefore, eligible to vote at the annual meeting.

What are my voting rights?

Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share. Therefore, 28,738,701 votes are entitled to be cast at the meeting. There is no cumulative voting.

How many shares must be present to hold the meeting?

In accordance with our Amended and Restated Bylaws, shares equal to at least a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares of our common stock as of the record date must be present at the meeting in order to hold the meeting and conduct business. This is called a quorum. Your shares are counted as present at the meeting if:

How do I vote my shares?

Your vote is important.     Because many shareholders do not attend the meeting in person, it is necessary that a large number be represented by proxy. If you are a shareholder of record, you can give a proxy to be voted at the meeting in either of the following ways:

The Internet voting procedure has been set up for your convenience. The procedure has been designed to authenticate your identity, allow you to give voting instructions, and confirm that those instructions have been recorded properly. If you are a shareholder of record and you would like to submit your proxy via the Internet, please refer to the specific instructions provided on the Notice or, if you received paper copies of our proxy materials, the enclosed proxy card. If you received paper copies of our proxy materials and wish to submit your proxy by mail, please return your signed proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope to us before the annual meeting. If you are an employee and received our 2013 proxy materials electronically via the Internet at your company email address, you will only be able to give a proxy to be voted at the meeting electronically via the Internet as described under “How do I vote if my shares are held in the 401(k) retirement plan, employee stock purchase plan or other plans of Apogee?” on page 3.

If you hold your shares in street name, you must vote your shares in the manner prescribed by your broker or other nominee. Your broker or other nominee has enclosed or otherwise provided a voting instruction card for you to use in directing the broker or other nominee how to vote your shares.

If you properly submit your proxy via the Internet or return your executed proxy by mail and do not revoke your proxy, it will be voted in the manner you specify.

What is a proxy?

A proxy is your designation of another person to vote stock you own. That other person is called a proxy. If you designate someone as your proxy in a written document, that document also is called a proxy or a proxy card. When you designate someone a proxy, you may also direct the proxy how to vote your shares. We refer to this as your “proxy vote.” Three of our executive officers, Joseph F. Puishys, James S. Porter and Patricia A. Beithon, have been designated as the proxies to cast the votes of our shareholders at our 2013 annual meeting.

What is a proxy statement?

A proxy statement is a document we are required to give you, or provide you access to, in accordance with the regulations of the SEC, when we ask you to designate proxies to vote your shares of our common stock at a meeting of our shareholders. The proxy statement includes information regarding the matters to be acted upon at the meeting and certain other information required by regulations of the SEC and rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”).

What is the difference between a shareholder of record and a “street name” holder?

If your shares are registered directly in your name, you are considered the shareholder of record with respect to those shares.

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank, trust or other nominee, then the broker, bank, trust or other nominee is considered to be the shareholder of record with respect to those shares. However, you still are considered the beneficial owner of those shares, and your shares are said to be held in “street name.” Street name holders generally cannot vote their shares directly and must instead instruct the broker, bank, trust or other nominee how to vote their shares using the voting instruction form provided by the broker, bank, trust or other nominee. Please refer to “How do I vote my shares?” above.

How do I vote if my shares are held in the 401(k) retirement plan, employee stock purchase plan or other plans of Apogee?

If you hold any shares in our 401(k) retirement plan, employee stock purchase plan or other plans of Apogee, your Internet proxy vote or completed proxy card will serve as voting instructions to the plan trustee. However, your voting instructions must be received at least one day prior to the annual meeting in order to count. In accordance with the terms of our 401(k) retirement plan, the trustee will vote all of the shares held in the plan in the same proportion as the actual proxy votes submitted by plan participants at least one day prior to the annual meeting. If you are a participant in our employee stock purchase plan, the plan custodian cannot vote your shares unless it receives timely instructions from you.

If you hold shares in our 401(k) retirement plan, employee stock purchase plan or other plans of Apogee and have a company email address, you will receive our 2013 proxy statement and 2013 Annual Report to Shareholders electronically at your company email address instead of receiving paper copies of these documents or the Notice in the mail. The email will provide instructions and a control number to use to provide voting instructions to the plan trustee via the Internet. If you receive our 2013 proxy statement and 2013 Annual Report to Shareholders electronically, you may only provide voting instructions to the plan trustee via the Internet and you will not receive a proxy card that can be returned by mail. If you are an employee who received our 2013 proxy statement and 2013 Annual Report to Shareholders electronically and you wish to receive a paper copy of these materials, you should contact:

What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy card?

If you receive more than one Notice or proxy card, it means that you hold shares registered in more than one account in different names or variations of your name. To ensure that all of your shares are voted, if you submit your proxy vote via the Internet, vote once for each Notice or proxy card you receive, or sign and return each proxy card.

You may prefer to hold your shares in more than one account, and you are welcome to do so. However, some multiple accounts are unintentional and will occur if one stock purchase is made with a middle initial and a subsequent purchase is made without a middle initial. Please contact our Investor Relations Department at IR@apog.com, (877) 752-3432 (telephone) or (952) 487-7565 (facsimile) for information on how to merge your accounts.

Can I vote my shares in person at the meeting?

If you are a shareholder of record, you may vote your shares in person at the meeting by completing a ballot at the meeting. Even if you currently plan to attend the meeting, we recommend that you also submit your proxy as described above so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the meeting.

If you hold your shares in street name, you may vote your shares in person at the meeting only if you obtain a signed letter or other proxy from your broker, bank, trust or other nominee giving you the right to vote the shares at the meeting.

If you are a participant in our 401(k) retirement plan, employee stock purchase plan or other plans of Apogee, you may submit a proxy vote as described above, but you may not vote your plan shares in person at the meeting.

What vote is required for the election of directors or for a proposal to be approved?

With respect to the election of directors, in accordance with Minnesota law, the nominees for election as Class III directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the annual meeting. This means that since shareholders will be electing three Class III directors, the three nominees for Class III director receiving the highest number of votes will be elected.

As provided in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, if a majority of our shares that are voted at the meeting are designated to be “withheld” from a director nominee’s election, then such nominee shall offer his or her resignation to our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for consideration. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will evaluate the best interests of Apogee and our shareholders and recommend to our Board of Directors the action to be taken with respect to that director’s offered resignation.

With respect to the Say on Pay Proposal and the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the annual meeting is required for the approval of those proposals (provided that the total number of shares voted in favor of the proposal constitutes more than 25% of our outstanding shares).

How are votes counted?

You may either vote “FOR” or “WITHHOLD” authority to vote for each nominee for our Board of Directors. You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” on the Say on Pay Proposal and the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.

If you submit your proxy but ABSTAIN from voting or WITHHOLD authority to vote on one or more matters, your shares will be counted as present at the meeting for the purpose of determining a quorum. Your shares also will be counted as present at the meeting for the purpose of calculating the vote on the particular matter from which you abstained from voting or withheld authority to vote.

If you ABSTAIN from voting on a proposal, your abstention has the same effect as a vote against that proposal. We will not count WITHHOLD authority as either for or against a director nominee, so WITHHOLD authority has no effect on the election of a director; however, if a majority of our shares that are voted at the meeting are designated to be WITHHOLD authority from a director nominee’s election, then such director nominee shall offer his or her resignation to our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for consideration, as described under “What vote is required for the election of directors or for a proposal to be approved?” above.

If you hold your shares in street name and do not provide voting instructions to your broker, your shares will be considered “broker non-votes” and will not be voted on any proposal on which your broker does not have discretionary authority to vote under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange. Shares that constitute broker non-votes will be counted as present at the meeting for the purpose of determining a quorum but will not be represented at the meeting for purposes of calculating the vote with respect to such matter or matters. This effectively reduces the number of shares needed to approve such matter or matters. Your broker or other nominee has discretionary authority to vote your shares on the ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, even if your broker or other nominee does not receive voting instructions from you. Your broker or other nominee does not have discretionary authority to vote your shares on the election of directors or Say on Pay Proposal if your broker or other nominee does not receive voting instructions from you.

Who will count the vote?

Representatives of Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., our tabulating agent, will tabulate the votes and act as independent inspector of election.

How does our Board of Directors recommend that I vote?

Our Board of Directors recommends a vote:

What if I do not specify how I want my shares voted?

If you submit your proxy via the Internet or a signed proxy card and do not specify how you want to vote your shares, we will vote your shares:

Can I change my vote after submitting my proxy or voting instructions?

Yes. If you are a shareholder of record, you may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before your proxy is voted at the annual meeting, in any of the following ways:

If you hold your shares in street name, you should contact your broker, bank, trust or other nominee for information on how to revoke your voting instructions and provide new voting instructions.

If you hold shares in our 401(k) retirement plan, employee stock purchase plan or other plans of Apogee, you may revoke your proxy and change your voting instructions at any time, but not less than one day before the annual meeting, in any of the following ways:

Will my vote be kept confidential?

Yes. We have procedures to ensure that, regardless of whether shareholders vote via the Internet, by mail or in person, (1) all proxies, ballots and voting tabulations that identify shareholders are kept permanently confidential, except as disclosure may be required by federal or state law or expressly permitted by a shareholder; and (2)  voting tabulations are performed by an independent third party.

How can I attend the meeting?

You may be asked to present valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport, before being admitted to the meeting. If you hold your shares in street name, you may also be asked to present proof of ownership to be admitted to the meeting. A recent statement from your broker, or letter from your bank, trust or other nominee are examples of proof of ownership.

Who pays for the cost of proxy preparation and solicitation?

We pay for the cost of proxy preparation and solicitation, including the reasonable charges and expenses of brokers and other nominees for forwarding proxy materials to the beneficial owners of our shares.

We are soliciting proxies primarily by mail and email. In addition, some of our officers and regular employees may solicit the return of proxies by telephone, facsimile, personal interview, email or telegram. These individuals will receive no additional compensation for these services.

How can I communicate with our Board of Directors?

Subject to reasonable constraints of time, topics and rules of order, you may direct comments to or ask questions of our Chair of the Board or

Chief Executive Officer during our 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. In addition, you may communicate directly with any director by writing to:

Apogee Directors

Apogee Enterprises, Inc.

4400 West 78^th Street, Suite 520

Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435

Attention: Corporate Secretary

Directors@apog.com

Our Corporate Secretary will promptly forward to our Board of Directors or the individually named directors all relevant written communications, as specified in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, received at the above addresses.

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of our securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership of those securities on Form 3 and reports of changes in ownership on Form 4 or Form 5. Specific due dates for these reports have been established by the SEC, and we are required to disclose in this proxy statement any failure to timely file the required reports by these dates. Based solely

on our review of the copies of these reports received by us and written representations from our directors and executive officers, we believe that our directors and executive officers complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements for the fiscal year ended March 2, 2013, except for one late Form 4 filing by Jerome L. Davis, our director, in connection with the exercise of stock options.

Our Restated Articles of Incorporation provide that our Board of Directors will be divided into three classes of directors of as nearly equal size as possible and the term of each class of directors is three years. Our articles further provide that the total number of directors will be determined exclusively by our Board of Directors. The term of one class expires each year in rotation. At our 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the terms of our Class III directors will expire. Currently, we have nine directors, with three directors serving in each of three classes. Jerome L. Davis, Sara L. Hays and Richard V. Reynolds are the current Class III directors who have been nominated for re-election to our Board as Class III directors. The Class III directors elected at our 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders will serve until our 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until their successors are elected and qualified. Each of the nominees has agreed to serve as a director if elected.

We have no reason to expect that any of the nominees will fail to be a candidate at our 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and, therefore, do not have in mind any substitute or substitutes for any of the nominees. If any of the nominees should be unable to serve as a director, proxies will be voted for a substitute nominee or nominees in accordance with the best judgment of the person or persons acting under the proxies.

Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the three Class III nominees for director. Unless authority for one or more of the nominees is withheld, proxies will be voted FOR the election of each of Ms. Hays and Messrs. Davis and Reynolds as Class III directors for a three-year term expiring at our 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The nominees for election as directors and the directors whose terms of office will continue after the annual meeting have provided information about themselves in the following section. SEC rules require us to discuss briefly the specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led the Board to conclude that each director or nominee for director should serve on our Board of Directors. All of our directors possess the minimum qualities and skills described under “Criteria for Membership on Our Board of Directors” on page 16.

Class III Directors – Nominees for Terms Expiring in 2016

Mr. Davis was President of Jerome L. Davis & Associates, LLC, a consulting firm focusing on executive coaching and leadership development, from 2006 until December 2009.

Mr. Davis was Global Vice President, Service Excellence for Electronic Data Systems, a business and technology services company, from July 2003 to October 2005. From May 2001 to July 2003, he served in various capacities at Electronic Data Systems, including Chief Client Executive Officer and President, Americas for Business Process Management. Prior to joining Electronic Data Systems, Mr. Davis served as President and Executive Officer of the Commercial Solutions Division of Maytag Corporation, a home and commercial appliance company, from October 1999 until May 2001. He served as Senior Vice President of Sales and Corporate Officer for Maytag’s Appliances Division from March 1998 to September 1999. From March 1992 to February 1998, Mr. Davis was Vice President of National Accounts and Area Vice President for Frito Lay, a global food company. Mr. Davis also held various sales and marketing positions with Proctor & Gamble, a global consumer products company, from 1977 to 1992.

Key Attributes, Experience and Skills – Mr. Davis brings to our Board 30 years of experience in Fortune 500 companies and extensive expertise and insight in the areas of marketing and sales, strategy development, international business, leadership development, succession planning, executive compensation and information technology. His role on another public company board provides him with public company board and corporate governance experience.

Other Directorships Since 2008 – Director of GameStop Corp.

Class III Directors – Nominees for Terms Expiring in 2016

		SARA L. HAYS   Age 48   Biography – Principal of SLH Advisors, a privately-held project management and consulting services firm, since May 2011. Our director since 2005. Member of our Audit
Committee and Strategy and Enterprise Risk Committee.

Ms. Hays served as Managing Director, Operations and General Counsel and member of the Executive and Investment Committees of Wrightwood Capital LLC (now part of Ares Management LLC), a real estate finance and investment company, from April 2005 through April 2011. Prior to joining Wrightwood Capital LLC, she spent over 10 years at Hyatt Hotels, a global hospitality company, initially as Development Counsel, structuring and negotiating management, venture, development and finance agreements, and ultimately serving as Senior Vice President and General Counsel and a member of Hyatt Hotels’ Managing Committee responsible for managing the legal risks associated with Hyatt Hotels’ worldwide operations, transactions and owned assets. Before joining Hyatt Hotels, Ms. Hays was an associate practicing commercial real estate law with the Chicago law firm of Coffield Ungaretti & Harris (now Ungaretti & Harris) from 1989 to 1994. Ms. Hays holds an MBA from Kellogg School of Management and a JD from Northwestern University School of Law.

Key Attributes, Experience and Skills – Ms. Hays has over 23 years of experience as a strategic business partner and counsel to senior executives and board members in the commercial real estate, finance and hospitality industries with particular expertise in the areas of operations and strategic planning, complex transactions, including acquisitions, debt and equity structuring and workouts, fund formation and management, legal and risk management, investor relations and corporate governance. Ms. Hays has over 17 years of service as in-house counsel to corporations (14 years as a general counsel) and has managed a broad range of legal, enterprise risk, regulatory, compliance and corporate governance issues. Ms. Hays also has private company and non-profit board experience.

General Reynolds retired from the U.S. Air Force in 2005 after 34 years of service, having served as Vice Commander, Air Force Material Command from 2003 to 2005; Commander, Aeronautical Systems Center of U.S. Air Force Material Command from 2001 to 2003; Commander, Air Force Flight Test Center of U.S. Air Force Material Command from 1998 to 2001; Program Executive Officer, Airlift and Trainers of the U.S. Air Force Program Executive Office from 1996 to 1998 and various other leadership positions from 1971 to 1996. General Reynolds formed The Van Fleet Group, LLC in 2006. He also served as Senior Manager/Senior Business Advisor of BearingPoint, Inc., an international management and technology consulting firm, from 2006 to 2009.

Key Attributes, Experience and Skills – General Reynolds’ service in senior leadership positions in the U.S. Air Force provides valuable business, leadership and management experience, including expertise in government contracting and procurement, risk assessment and mitigation, supply chain and logistics management, information technology and leadership development. General Reynolds also has experience serving on public and private company and non-profit boards.

Other Directorships Since 2008 – Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.

Mr. Marzec retired from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in 2002 after spending 36 years in its Assurance and Business Advisory Services (financial and regulatory reporting division). He held various leadership and audit positions, including Managing Partner of the Minneapolis office of PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP from 1991 to 1998.

Key Attributes, Experience and Skills – Mr. Marzec has extensive public accounting and auditing experience at public, private and non-profit organizations and has a strong background in financial controls and reporting, financial management, financial analysis, SEC reporting requirements, mergers and acquisitions, and international business. During his service at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and on boards at other public and mutual companies and non-profit organizations, Mr. Marzec gained broad knowledge of many different companies and industries, and public company board and corporate governance practices.

Other Directorships Since 2008 – Formerly a director of Medtox Scientific, Inc. and Health Fitness Corporation.

Mr. Mitchell has more than 35 years of leadership experience in the facilities management and commercial construction industries, serving as Vice Chair of Knight Facilities Management, Inc. since 1995 and as President and Chief Operating Officer of Lester B. Knight & Associates, a company that provided engineering, architectural and management consulting services in connection with the planning, design and construction of advanced technology research and development and manufacturing facilities and other commercial buildings, from 1975 to 2001. Mr. Mitchell has provided consulting services to new business ventures as President and Chief Operating Officer of The Knight Group, LLC since 2001.

Key Attributes, Experience and Skills – Mr. Mitchell’s more than 35 years of service in senior leadership positions at privately held companies in the facilities management and commercial construction industries provides valuable business, management and leadership experience, including expertise in strategy development, construction project management, building technology, international business, leadership development and succession planning. His role on another public company board provides him with public company board and corporate governance experience.

Other Directorships Since 2008 – Director of Landauer, Inc.

Class I Directors – Terms Expiring in 2014

Mr. Weiss has 33 years of leadership experience in the computer and information technology industry, serving as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Storage Technology Corporation from 1996 to 2000 and in other executive positions with Storage Technology Corporation from 1991 to 1996, including Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President, Senior Vice President for Marketing and Vice President – Global Marketing. Prior to joining Storage Technology Corporation, Mr. Weiss worked in various engineering management positions with IBM Corporation, a global computer and information technology company, from 1967 to 1991.

Key Attributes, Experience and Skills – As Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Storage Technology Corporation, Mr. Weiss led a global public company and public company board. Through his service at Storage Technology Corporation and IBM Corporation, he gained expertise in the areas of business operations, strategy development, information technology, mergers and acquisitions, financial management, leadership development and succession planning, executive compensation, marketing, investor relations and corporate governance.

Other Directorships Since 2008 – Formerly a director of Incentra Solutions, Inc.

Class II Directors – Terms Expiring in 2015

Mr. Aldrich retired as Chief Executive Officer and President and a director of Rimage Corporation in 2009, after 12 years of service in those capacities. Prior to joining Rimage Corporation in 1997, he served as President of several manufacturing companies controlled by Activar, Inc., an industrial plastics and construction supply company, from 1995 to 1996. Mr. Aldrich served as President of Colwell Industries, a company that designs, manufactures and distributes color merchandising tools, from 1992 to 1994 and as Chief Financial Officer of Advance Machine Co., a manufacturer and supplier of equipment for the commercial floor care industry, from 1973 to 1991.

Key Attributes, Experience and Skills – Mr. Aldrich has 13 years of public company operational experience, eight years of private company operational experience and 18 years of private company financial management experience. In addition to leading companies, he has a background and expertise in manufacturing operations, financial management, global markets, executive compensation, leadership development and corporate governance. Mr. Aldrich also has recent experience leading a public company board.

Other Directorships Since 2008 – Formerly a director of Rimage Corporation.

Mr. Manning retired from BDO Seidman LLP in 2000 after 27 years of service. During his tenure with BDO Seidman LLP (and its affiliate, BDO International Limited), he worked in various management positions for 12 years, including Vice Chairman from 1995 to 1999, Managing Partner of the Richmond, Virginia office from 1990 to 1991, and various management positions in the international headquarters in Brussels, Belgium from 1992 to 1995. Prior to moving into management with BDO Seidman LLP, Mr. Manning spent 15 years providing auditing services to BDO Seidman LLP’s clients.

Key Attributes, Experience and Skills – Mr. Manning has extensive public accounting, auditing and management experience. For over 15 years, he held leadership positions at BDO Seidman LLP and BDO International Limited with responsibilities for domestic and global strategy development and execution. He also led BDO Seidman LLP’s enterprise risk management program for over five years. During his tenure at BDO Seidman LLP, he gained broad knowledge of many different industries, including a specialty in the commercial construction industry, and experience working with public, private and not-for-profit boards. Mr. Manning has background and expertise in financial management, strategic planning, information technology, leadership development, risk assessment and mitigation, human resources, and international operations. Mr. Manning also has experience serving on public and private company boards.

Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Puishys served in various leadership positions at Honeywell International, Inc., a Fortune 100 diversified technology and manufacturing company, for over 32 years. He served as President of Honeywell Environment & Combustion Controls from 2008 to 2011; President of Honeywell Building Solutions from 2005 to 2008; President of Honeywell Building Solutions, America from 2004 to 2005; President of Bendix Friction Materials from 2002 to 2004; Vice President and General Manager of Garrett Engine Boosting Systems from 2000 to 2002; Vice President and General Manager, Aftermarket, Allied Signal Turbocharging Systems from 1996 to 2000; Vice President, Logistics, Allied Signal Automotive Products Group from 1992 to 1996; and various accounting and financial positions from 1979 to 1992.

Key Attributes, Experience and Skills – Mr. Puishys brings extensive expertise and insight to our Board in the areas of the commercial building and construction industry, global markets, sales and operations, business building, mergers and acquisitions, operational excellence, leadership development and financial management.

Other Directorships Since 2008 – Director of Arctic Cat Inc.

Corporate Governance Section of Our Web Site

Information relative to our corporate governance is available on our web site at www.apog.com by clicking on “Corporate Governance” and then the applicable document or information. This information includes:

We will provide copies of any of the foregoing information without charge upon written request to: Corporate Secretary, Apogee Enterprises, Inc., 4400 West 78^th Street, Suite 520, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435.

Code of Business Ethics and Conduct

Our Board of Directors has adopted our Code of Business Ethics and Conduct (our “Code of Conduct”), which is a statement of our high standards for ethical behavior and legal compliance. All of our employees, including our executive officers, and all members of our Board of Directors are required to comply with our Code of Conduct.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines outline the role, composition, qualifications, operation and other policies applicable to our Board of Directors. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines are reviewed annually and revised as necessary to continue to reflect evolving corporate governance practices.

Board Independence

Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, a substantial majority of the directors on our Board, and all members of our Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees must be independent. Each year, in accordance with NASDAQ rules, our Board of Directors affirmatively determines

the independence of each director and nominee for election as a director in accordance with guidelines it has adopted, which include all elements of independence set forth in the NASDAQ listing standards.

With the assistance of legal counsel to the Company, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviewed the applicable legal standards for Board member and Board committee member independence. In making its independence recommendation, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviewed a summary of the answers to annual questionnaires completed by each Board member regarding employment, business, familial, compensation and other relationships with Apogee and our management. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reported on its review to our Board of Directors. Based on this review, our Board of Directors has determined that the following non-employee directors are independent and have no material relationship with us except serving as a director or shareholder: Bernard P. Aldrich, Jerome L. Davis, Sara L. Hays, John T. Manning, Robert J. Marzec, Stephen C. Mitchell, Richard V. Reynolds and David E. Weiss. Our Board of Directors has determined that Joseph F. Puishys is not independent because he serves as our Chief Executive Officer and President.

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Non-Employee Directors

Our Board of Directors believes that non-employee directors should have a significant equity interest in Apogee and established voluntary stock ownership guidelines for directors in 2002. The guidelines encourage share ownership by our directors in an amount having a market value of $120,000 (three times the current annual Board retainer of $40,000) to be achieved within five years of first being elected as a director. In calculating share ownership of our non-employee directors, we include shares of restricted stock issued pursuant to our 2009 Director Stock Plan and phantom stock units under our Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, but do not include unexercised stock options. As of March 1, 2013, the last trading day of fiscal 2013, all our non-employee directors met our stock ownership guidelines.

Retirement Policy

Our Board of Directors has established a policy that, unless otherwise approved by a majority of our directors, no individual who is over 72 years of age may be elected to serve as a director.

Procedures for Shareholder Recommendations or Nominations of Director Candidates

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers recommendations of director candidates. A shareholder who wishes to recommend a director candidate to our Board of Directors for nomination by our Board of Directors at our annual meeting or for vacancies on our Board of Directors that arise between meetings must provide our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee with sufficient written documentation to permit a determination by our Board of Directors as to whether such candidate meets the required and desired director selection criteria set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the factors discussed below under the heading “Criteria for Membership on Our Board of Directors.” Such documentation and the name of the director candidate must be sent by U.S. mail to our Corporate Secretary at the address indicated on the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Our Corporate Secretary will send properly submitted shareholder recommendations to the Chair of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for consideration at a future committee meeting.

Alternatively, shareholders may directly nominate a person for election to our Board of Directors by complying with the procedures set forth in our Amended and Restated Bylaws and the rules and regulations of the SEC. Our Amended and Restated Bylaws are available on our website at www.apog.com by clicking on “Corporate Governance,” then “Bylaws.” Any shareholder nominations of director candidates for the 2014 election of directors should be submitted to our Corporate Secretary at the address indicated on the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders no later than February 26, 2014.

Director candidates recommended by shareholders in compliance with these procedures and who meet the criteria outlined above will be evaluated by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in the same manner as nominees proposed by other sources.

Criteria for Membership on Our Board of Directors

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines outline our director qualification standards. Director candidates should possess the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values; be committed to representing the long-term interests of our stakeholders; have an inquisitive and objective perspective, practical wisdom and mature judgment; and be willing to challenge management in a constructive manner. Our Board of Directors strives for membership that is diverse in gender, ethnicity, age, geographic location, and business skills and experience at policy-making levels. In addition, director candidates must be willing to devote sufficient time to carrying out their duties and responsibilities effectively, and should be committed to serving on our Board of Directors for an extended period of time.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s procedure for reviewing the qualifications of all nominees for membership on our Board of Directors include making a preliminary assessment of each proposed nominee, based upon resume and biographical information, willingness to serve, and other background information, business experience and leadership skills. All director candidates who continue in the process are then interviewed by members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a majority of our other current directors. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee makes recommendations to our Board of Directors for inclusion in the slate of director nominees at an annual or special meeting of shareholders, or for appointment by our Board of Directors to fill a vacancy. Prior to recommending a director to stand for re-election for another term, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee applies its director candidate selection criteria, including a director’s past contributions to our Board of Directors, effectiveness as a director and desire to continue to serve as a director.

Board Meetings and 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

During fiscal 2013, our Board of Directors met five times and our non-employee directors met in executive session without our Chief Executive Officer or any other members of management being present four times. Each of our directors attended at least 75% of the regularly scheduled and special meetings of our Board of Directors

and the Board committees on which he or she served that were held during the time he or she was a director during fiscal 2013. All members of our Board of Directors are expected to attend our annual meetings of shareholders and all nine of the members of our Board of Directors attended our 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee is governed by a Board-approved charter, which was last amended in June 2011. Under its charter, our Audit Committee oversees our financial reporting process (including our system of financial controls, internal audit procedures and independent registered public accounting firm); oversees our program to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and ethical business practices; assesses and establishes policies and procedures to manage our financial reporting and internal control risk; is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of our independent registered public accounting firm; establishes policies and procedures for the pre-approval of all services provided by our independent registered public

accounting firm; and oversees our internal audit function and has established procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal controls and auditing matters.

Our Board of Directors has determined that each member of our Audit Committee meets the independence and experience requirements of the NASDAQ listing standards and the SEC. Our Board of Directors has also determined that each of John T. Manning and Robert J. Marzec is an audit committee financial expert under the rules of the SEC.

Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee is governed by a Board-approved charter, which was last amended in January 2013. Under its charter, our Compensation Committee establishes our executive compensation philosophy and compensation programs that comply with this philosophy; determines the compensation of our executive officers and other members of senior management; administers our stock incentive plans in which our employees participate; and administers our annual cash and long-term incentive plans for executive officers and other members of senior management. Our Compensation Committee regularly reviews its decisions on compensation for our Chief Executive Officer with the full Board of Directors prior to communicating those decisions to our Chief Executive Officer.

Our Board of Directors has determined that each member of our Compensation Committee is independent, as defined by the NASDAQ listing standards. In addition, each member of our Compensation Committee is a “non-employee” director, as defined in the Exchange Act, and is an “outside director” as defined in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is governed by a Board-approved charter, which was last amended in January 2013. Under its charter, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee periodically assesses our compliance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines; reviews our organizational structure and succession plans; makes recommendations to our Board of Directors regarding the composition and responsibilities of our Board committees; makes recommendations to our Board of Directors regarding compensation for directors; annually conducts a performance review of our Board committees and Board of Directors as a whole and of our directors whose terms are expiring at that year’s annual meeting of shareholders; annually conducts a review of the performance of our Chief Executive Officer, which includes soliciting assessments from all non-employee directors; and establishes and implements procedures to review the qualifications of all nominees for membership on our Board of Directors, including nominees recommended by our shareholders.

Our Board of Directors has determined that each member of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is independent, as defined by the NASDAQ listing standards.

Strategy and Enterprise Risk Committee

Our Strategy and Enterprise Risk Committee is governed by a Board-approved charter, which was last amended in May 2013. Under its charter, our Strategy and Enterprise Risk Committee oversees the process for development of our strategies, long-range business objectives and strategic plan; oversees our progress with respect to our Board-approved strategy; reviews and makes recommendations to our Board of Directors with respect to that portion of our growth strategy that is expected to be accomplished by Corporate Strategic Transactions (as defined in the charter); oversees our financial strategy, long-range financial objectives and financial condition; reviews our annual capital budget and process for evaluating and approving significant capital expenditure projects; provides oversight for our enterprise risk management function; and oversees our company-wide information technology strategy and the selection, implementation and financing of material company-wide information technology systems.

Our Board of Directors has determined that four of the five members of our Strategy and Enterprise Risk Committee are independent, as defined by the NASDAQ listing standards.

Risk Oversight by Our Board of Directors

Our Board of Directors executes its overall responsibility for risk management directly and through its Committees, as follows:

Our Board of Directors is kept abreast of the risk oversight efforts by our Committees through reports to our full Board by our Committee Chairs presented at each quarterly meeting of our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors considers specific risk topics, including risks associated with our strategic plan, mergers and acquisitions, and market risks.

Board Leadership Structure

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that our Board of Directors has discretion to combine or separate the offices of Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer.

Our Board of Directors separated the roles of Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and appointed Mr. Aldrich as the Non-Executive Chair of our Board on January 19, 2011. In this capacity, Mr. Aldrich has chaired the meetings of our Board of Directors and executive sessions of our independent directors. The Non-Executive Chair of our Board, in consultation with our Chief Executive Officer, establishes the agenda for each meeting of our Board of Directors. For five years prior to separating the roles of Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, our Board of Directors had appointed a Lead Director.

We believe our Board leadership structure supports the risk oversight function of our Board of Directors. In addition to having a Non-Executive Chair of the Board, strong independent directors chair each of our Board Committees, there is open communication between management and our directors, and all of our directors are actively involved in the risk oversight function.

We have established written policies and procedures (the “Related Person Transaction Policy”) to assist us in reviewing transactions in excess of $120,000 involving our Company and our subsidiaries and Related Persons (“Related Person Transactions”). A Related Person includes our Company’s directors, director nominees and executive officers, beneficial owners of 5% or more of our Company’s common stock and their respective Immediate Family Members (as defined in our Related Person Transaction Policy). Our Related Person Transaction Policy supplements our Code of Conduct Conflict of Interest Policy (the “Conflict of Interest Policy”), which applies to all of our employees and directors.

Our Related Person Transaction Policy requires our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel to promptly report any Related Person Transaction of which they become aware to the Chair of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. In approving, ratifying or rejecting a Related Person Transaction, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider such information as it deems important to determine if the Related Person Transaction is fair to our Company. Our Conflict of Interest Policy requires our employees and directors to report to our General Counsel any potential conflict of interest situations involving an employee or director or their Immediate Family Members. During fiscal 2013, there were no Related Person Transactions.

Non-Employee Director Compensation Arrangements During Fiscal 2013 and 2014

Our Board of Directors approves the compensation for members of our Board of Directors and Board Committees based on the recommendations of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. We target compensation for service on our Board of Directors and Board committees generally at the median for board services at companies in our peer group of companies, using the same peer group used for executive compensation purposes described under the heading “Competitive Market” on page 32. Generally, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews and discusses the compensation data and analysis provided by management using a third party compensation database, or independent compensation

consultant, if retained. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee did not utilize an independent compensation consultant to advise the Committee on fiscal 2013 or fiscal 2014 non-employee director compensation. Our Chief Executive Officer participates in the discussions on compensation for members of our Board of Directors. Directors who are our employees receive no additional compensation for serving on our Board of Directors.

Our non-employee directors receive cash compensation in the form of cash retainers and equity compensation in the form of restricted stock awards, as described under the heading “Restricted Stock Awards” on page 21. Mr. Puishys, our only employee director, receives no additional compensation for serving on our Board of Directors.

Restricted Stock Awards

Restricted stock awards to non-employee directors are issued pursuant to our 2009 Director Stock Plan. Each non-employee director receives a time-based restricted stock award on the date he or she is first elected to our Board and annually on the date of our annual meeting of shareholders if his or her term continues after such meeting. The number of shares of restricted stock subject to the award is determined by our Board of Directors, after recommendation by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and

consideration of various factors, including our performance, market data and trends, performance by our Board as a whole and the equity-based compensation received by non-employee directors approximating the 50^th percentile of our peer group of companies, using the same peer group of companies used for executive compensation purposes. The restricted stock awards made in fiscal 2011 fully vest on the third anniversary of the date of the award. The time-based restricted stock awards made in fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2013 vest in three annual installments over the three-year vesting period.

Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors

Our Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors was adopted by our Board of Directors to encourage our non-employee directors to continue to make contributions to the growth and profits of Apogee and to increase their ownership of shares of our common stock, thereby aligning their interests in the long-term success of Apogee with that of our other shareholders. Under the plan, participants may elect to defer a portion of their annual retainer into deferred stock accounts. Since January 1, 2010, there has been no Company match on amounts deferred by our non-employee directors under such plan. Each participating director receives a credit of shares of our common stock in an amount equal to the amount deferred divided by the fair market value of one share of our common stock as of the crediting date. These accounts also are credited, as of the crediting date, with an amount equal to the dividend paid on one share of our common stock multiplied by the number of shares credited to each account. Participating

directors may elect to receive the amounts credited to their accounts at a fixed date, at age 70 or following death or retirement from our Board of Directors. The amounts will be paid out in the form of shares of our common stock (plus cash in lieu of fractional shares) either in a lump sum or in installments, at the participating director’s election. This plan is an unfunded, book-entry, “phantom stock unit” plan, as no trust or other vehicle has been established to hold any shares of our common stock.

Charitable Matching Contributions Program for Non-Employee Directors

Under our Charitable Matching Contributions Program for Non-Employee Directors, we match cash or publicly-traded stock contributions made by our non-employee directors to cultural, educational, social, medical or health-related charitable organizations that are exempt from federal income tax and qualify as a charity to which individuals can make a tax-deductible contribution up to a maximum aggregate amount of $2,000 per eligible non-employee director per calendar year.

Compensation Committee Report

Our Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the following Compensation Discussion and Analysis section with management and the Committee’s independent compensation consultant. Based on its review and discussions with management, our Compensation Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s 2013 proxy statement and in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 2, 2013.

Compensation Committee of the

Board of Directors of Apogee

David E. Weiss, Chair

Jerome L. Davis

Stephen C. Mitchell

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes Apogee’s executive compensation program for fiscal 2013, and certain elements of the fiscal 2014 program. In particular, this section explains how our Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) made decisions related to compensation for our executives, including our Named Executive Officers, for fiscal 2013.

Our Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2013 were:

Messrs. Porter, Klein and Johnson and Ms. Beithon are collectively referred to as our “Other Named Executive Officers” in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis section.

Executive Summary

About Apogee. We provide distinctive value-added glass solutions for the architectural and picture framing industries. We have four reporting segments. Our Architectural Glass segment fabricates glass used in customized window and curtainwall systems comprising the outside skin of commercial and institutional buildings. Our Architectural Framing Systems segment designs, engineers and fabricates the aluminum frames used in customized aluminum and glass window, curtainwall, storefront and entrance systems comprising the outside skin and entrances of commercial and institutional buildings. Our Architectural Services segment primarily installs and renovates customized aluminum and glass window and curtainwall systems comprising the outside skin and entrances of commercial and institutional buildings. Our Large-Scale Optical Technologies segment manufactures value-added glass and acrylic products for the custom picture framing market.

The table below sets forth the percentage contribution of our overall net sales for fiscal 2013 of each of our operating segments.

During the second half of fiscal 2012, we executed a successful leadership transition when Joseph F. Puishys joined our Company as Chief Executive Officer and President, succeeding Russell Huffer, who had announced his intent to retire during fiscal 2012.

Our Fiscal 2013 Performance. Despite challenging business conditions and a flat commercial construction market during fiscal 2013, our Company significantly improved financial performance over fiscal 2012.

In addition to the significant financial improvements during fiscal 2013, we made considerable progress on our growth strategies for fiscal 2014 and future years.

Additionally, we took actions to improve our operations for fiscal 2014 and future years.

Creating Shareholder Value. Despite the U.S. commercial construction market being in a down cycle for more than four years, our Company has delivered substantial improvement in total shareholder returns and has outperformed the companies in our compensation peer group (identified under “Competitive Market’ on page 32), and the Russell 2000 Index. In fiscal 2013, our Company delivered total shareholder returns of 98%, more than four times higher than our compensation peer group and over eight times higher than the Russell 2000 Index. The chart below compares our Company’s total shareholder returns to our compensation peer group and the Russell 2000 Index for the past one, three and five-year periods.

We have had significantly improved financial performance over the last three fiscal years, as evidenced by our growth in net sales and earnings per share from continuing operations. These metrics are used in our incentive compensation plans to reward our executives and align pay with performance.

Executive Compensation Philosophy and Practices. Our compensation programs are designed to attract, motivate and retain executive talent to achieve long-term success of our Company; pay for sustainable performance in an ever-changing environment; and align the interests of our executive officers with our shareholders. We continue to refine our executive compensation program to reflect evolving executive compensation practices. The table on page 27 highlights our current executive compensation practices.

Our Fiscal 2013 Executive Compensation Program. Total compensation includes a mix of short-term and long-term compensation and fixed and performance-based compensation.

Compensation Mix. The charts below illustrate the short-term and long-term mix, and fixed and performance-based mix of the primary compensation elements for fiscal 2013 for our Named Executive Officers. The fiscal 2013 primary compensation elements include base salary, annual performance-based cash incentive at target, time-based restricted stock awards, and the full value of the two-year cash-based performance awards at target performance, which are end-to-end awards that will only be granted every other year.

Highlights of Fiscal 2013 Compensation Actions. The following highlights the Committee’s key compensation decisions for fiscal 2013. These decisions were made after reviewing compensation data provided by the Committee’s independent compensation consultant.

On April 27, 2012, the Committee awarded to our Chief Executive Officer a time-based restricted stock award with a grant date value of $500,004, 79% of his fiscal 2013 base salary. On April 26 and 30, 2012, the Committee awarded to our Other Named Executive Officers time-based restricted stock awards with a grant date value ranging from $49,469 to $225,608, ranging from 24% to 82% of their fiscal 2013 base salaries. Time-based restricted stock awards are approximately 29% and 26% of the long-term incentive compensation opportunity granted during fiscal 2013 for our Chief Executive Officer and Other Named Executive Officers, respectively.

In April 2012, the Committee awarded Fiscal 2013 – 2014 cash-based performance awards to our Chief Executive Officer with a value of $1,200,000 at target, and our Other Named Executive Officers awards with values ranging from $134,913 to $540,000 at target. These awards are end-to-end awards, will only be granted every other year, and reflect approximately 71% and 74% of the total long-term incentive compensation opportunity granted during fiscal 2013 for our Chief Executive Officer and Other Named Executive Officers, respectively. Our Company will not issue Fiscal 2015 – 2016 cash-based performance awards until completion of the Fiscal 2013 – 2014 award cycle.

Our compensation program is evaluated annually taking into consideration changes to our business strategy, the economy and our competitive marketplace. The Committee reviews a compensation “tally sheet,” which lists total direct compensation (base salary, annual cash incentive compensation and long-term incentive awards), perquisites, other elements of executive compensation, broad-based employee benefits and wealth accumulation through Company equity and retirement plans for our Named Executive Officers. The compensation tally sheet is one of many factors used by the Committee to make individual compensation decisions.

The Committee does not generally consider compensation earned in prior years in establishing the elements and levels of compensation for the current fiscal year. However, the Committee does assess historical pay and performance to ensure continued alignment of pay and performance. The Committee also considers the annual performance evaluations of our Named Executive Officers and reviews its compensation consultant’s independent analyses of compensation for our Named Executive Officers and other executive officers and senior management based on comparable positions using both published survey sources and company peer group data to determine our competitive positioning relative to the markets where we recruit. Our Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to the Committee on compensation for our other Named Executive Officers, but does not participate in the determination of his own compensation.

The Committee makes the annual grant of long-term equity awards to executives primarily at its regularly scheduled meeting held during our Company’s first quarter of each fiscal year. The exact date of such meeting is generally established by the Committee more than a year in advance of the meeting.

Annually, the performance of each of our Named Executive Officers is evaluated based on a subjective assessment of (i) his or her executive leadership and (ii) achievement of agreed-upon individual business objectives for the just-completed fiscal year. The annual performance evaluation of our Chief Executive Officer is conducted by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, with all non-employee

directors participating in the performance evaluation. The results of the Chief Executive Officer’s annual performance evaluation are reported to and reviewed by the Committee and our full Board. Our Chief Executive Officer conducts or participates in the annual performance evaluation of our Other Named Executive Officers, reviews the results with members of the Committee, and makes recommendations to the Committee on compensation for our Other Named Executive Officers.

The Role of Shareholder Vote on Say on Pay Proposal

Our Company provides our shareholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on our Say on Pay Proposal annually. At our Company’s annual meeting of shareholders held on June 21, 2012, 67.5% of the votes cast on the Say on Pay Proposal were voted in favor of the proposal, compared to a 96.8% favorable vote at the meeting held on June 22, 2011. Our Company had not made any significant changes to our executive compensation program between fiscal 2011 and 2012. Our Company reviewed the vote recommendations of proxy advisory firms for our 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and had conference calls and other communications with the proxy advisory firm making an “Against” vote recommendation to fully understand the basis for such recommendation. In addition, our Company’s management met with various investors throughout the year, and no executive compensation concerns were raised by the investors with whom they met. Based on these actions, the Committee believes the vote on our Company’s Say on Pay Proposal at our 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders was adversely impacted in large part due to the new hire equity awards provided to Mr. Puishys when he joined our Company, which were intended to replace a portion, but not all, of the compensation earned at his prior employer that he forfeited when he joined our Company, and our Company’s financial performance during fiscal 2011.

Since Mr. Puishys joined our Company as Chief Executive Officer and President, our shareholders have seen an increase of approximately 98% in one-year total shareholder return for fiscal 2013, Mr. Puishys’ first fiscal year as Chief Executive Officer, and substantial increases in our overall financial performance. For fiscal 2013, Mr. Puishys participated in the same compensation program as our Other Named Executive Officers, with 62% of his compensation awarded in fiscal 2013 being performance-based and lower levels of long-term equity incentives as compared to fiscal 2012. The Committee will continue to take into account the outcome of our Company’s Say on Pay Proposal when making future compensation decisions.

Consulting Assistance, Competitive Market and Compensation Positioning

Compensation Consultant Independence. In fiscal 2013, the Committee retained the services of Pearl Meyer & Partners (“PM&P”) to assist with the review of overall compensation for our executive officers, as well as the review of our proxy statement disclosure regarding executive compensation. PM&P reports directly to the Committee and the Committee can replace PM&P or hire additional consultants at any time. In fiscal 2013, PM&P attended all Committee meetings in person or by telephone, including executive sessions as requested, and consulted frequently with the Chair of the Committee between meetings.

As required under the Dodd-Frank Act, the Committee has analyzed whether the work of PM&P as its compensation consultant raises any conflict of interest, taking into consideration the following factors under this rule: (i) PM&P does not provide any other services to our Company; (ii) the amount of fees from our Company paid to PM&P is less than 1% of PM&P’s total revenue; (iii) PM&P’s policies and procedures were designed to ensure independence; (iv) PM&P does not have any business or personal relationship with an executive officer of our Company; (v) PM&P does not have any business or personal relationship with any member of the Committee; and (vi) neither PM&P, nor any member of its consulting team, owns any stock of our Company. The Committee has determined, based on its analysis of the above factors, that PM&P is independent of our Company and the work of PM&P and the individual compensation

advisors employed by PM&P as compensation consultants to the Committee has not created any conflict of interest. The Committee will continue to monitor the independence of its compensation consultant on an annual basis.

Competitive Market. The Committee relies on its independent compensation consultant to help define the appropriate competitive market using a combination of peer group companies and surveys of manufacturing and general industry executive compensation identified by its compensation consultant. The information on the competitive market is used by the Committee:

The selection criteria identified for determining and reviewing our Company’s peer group generally include:

During the third quarter of fiscal 2012, using the selection criteria outlined above, the Committee, with the assistance of its independent compensation consultant, identified a peer group consisting of the 15 companies listed below. Each company selected met at least three of the selection criteria. During fiscal 2013, the Committee reevaluated and confirmed this 15-company peer group remains appropriate for compensation purposes. Three of the 15 companies in our compensation peer group have the same six-digit GICS code as our Company (201020).

Fiscal 2013 Compensation Actions

Fiscal 2013 Annual Performance Evaluations. The performance during fiscal 2013 of each of our Named Executive Officers was evaluated based on a subjective assessment of (i) his or her executive leadership and (ii) achievement against his or her individual business objectives for fiscal 2013. Below is certain information regarding each Named Executive Officer’s individual business objectives for fiscal 2013 and accomplishments against those objectives.

Base Salary. Base salary reflects a fixed portion of the overall compensation package and is the base amount from which other compensation elements are determined, such as target annual cash incentive opportunities, long-term incentive compensation award opportunities, benefits and retirement savings opportunities. Because several other elements of compensation are driven by base salary, the Committee is careful to set the appropriate level of base salary.

Base salaries for our Named Executive Officers are individually determined by the Committee. There are three situations that may warrant adjustment to base salary:

Annual Cash Incentive Compensation. Annual cash incentive awards are designed to reward short-term performance results and the metrics are generally objective financial goals based on the annual operating plan approved by our Board of Directors. For fiscal 2013, annual cash incentive awards to our Named Executive Officers were made pursuant to our shareholder-approved Apogee Enterprises, Inc. 2012 Executive Management Incentive Plan (the “Executive MIP”), as described below.

Executive MIP. Our Executive MIP was adopted to ensure the tax deductibility of the annual cash incentive compensation that may be earned by our Named Executive Officers. Our Executive MIP is designed to be an annual bonus “pool” plan. Each fiscal year, the Committee establishes a bonus pool equal to a percentage of one or more performance factors from a list of approved factors set forth in our Executive MIP. Our Company must meet the selected performance factor for the bonus pool in order for a bonus pool to be funded to allow for any actual payout under the plan.

Each fiscal year, the Committee selects the executives of our Company who will participate in our Executive MIP for that year and assigns a percentage of the bonus pool to each participating executive, with the total percentage not to exceed 100% of the bonus pool for any given fiscal year. The percentage of the bonus pool assigned to each participating executive establishes the maximum annual cash incentive award payout for that individual participant for the current fiscal year; however, no one individual payout can exceed $3,000,000 in any given fiscal year.

The actual annual cash incentive awards to be paid to participants after the annual bonus pool has been established may be adjusted downward based on the achievement of one or more additional predetermined, objective performance goals based on the annual operating plan approved by our Board of Directors. At least one of the additional predetermined, objective performance goals must be met at the threshold level in order for any annual cash incentive to be paid to an executive. In addition, if our Company is not profitable, no annual cash incentives will be paid even if the other goals are at or above threshold.

Generally, if the threshold performance level for all financial goals is achieved, 50% or less of the target award will be paid; if target performance level for all financial goals is achieved, 100% of the target award will be paid; and if maximum performance level for all annual financial goals is achieved, 200% of the target award will be paid. If threshold performance level for only one financial metric is achieved and threshold performance is not achieved for any of the other financial goals, less than 50% of the target award will be paid based on the weighting allocated to that specific financial performance goal. For any performance between these levels, awards will be interpolated. The Committee has the discretion to further reduce payouts under our Executive MIP as appropriate.

For fiscal 2013, short-term compensation, which includes base salary and actual annual cash incentive earned for each of our Named Executive Officers ranged from greater than the 75^th percentile for our Chief Executive Officer and from the 55^th to greater than the 75^th percentile for our Other Named Executive Officers, based on data provided by the Committee’s independent compensation

consultant. The amounts of the fiscal 2013 annual cash incentive award payouts as determined by the Committee are also disclosed in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table” on page 46. Information regarding the payout of the fiscal 2013 annual cash incentive awards for our Named Executive Officers is set forth in the following chart.