e10vq
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007
OR
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission File Number: 0001-338613
REGENCY ENERGY PARTNERS LP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
DELAWARE
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
  16-1731691
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
     
1700 PACIFIC AVENUE, SUITE 2900
DALLAS, TX

(Address of principal executive offices)
  75201
(Zip Code)
(214) 750-1771
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
NONE
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o      Accelerated filer o     Non-accelerated filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
The issuer had 40,470,969 common units and 19,103,896 subordinated units outstanding as of August 7, 2007.
 
 

 


 

         
     
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of CEO
 Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of CFO
 Section 1350 Certifications of CEO
 Section 1350 Certifications of CFO
 Regency GP LP Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
Cautionary Statement about Forward-Looking Statements
Certain matters discussed in this report include “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements are identified as any statement that does not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Statements using words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “project,” “plan,” “expect,” “continue,” “estimate,” “goal,” “forecast,” “may” or similar expressions help identify forward-looking statements. Although we believe our forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions and current expectations and projections about future events, we can not give assurances that such expectations will prove to be correct. Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of risks, uncertainties and assumptions including without limitation the following:
  §   changes in laws and regulations impacting the midstream sector of the natural gas industry;
 
  §   the level of creditworthiness of our counterparties;
 
  §   our ability to access the debt and equity markets;
 
  §   our use of derivative financial instruments to hedge commodity risks;
 
  §   the amount of collateral required to be posted from time to time in our transactions;
 
  §   changes in commodity prices, interest rates and demand for our services;
 
  §   weather and other natural phenomena;
 
  §   industry changes including the impact of consolidations and changes in competition;
 
  §   our ability to obtain required approvals for construction or modernization of our facilities and the timing of production from such facilities; and
 
  §   the effect of accounting pronouncements issued periodically by accounting standard setting boards.
If one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated, estimated, projected or expected.
Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of the particular statement and we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

 


Table of Contents

Part I – Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Regency Energy Partners LP
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands except unit data)
                 
    June 30, 2007     December 31, 2006  
    Unaudited          
ASSETS
               
Current Assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 31,071     $ 9,139  
Restricted cash
    5,912       5,782  
Accrued revenues and accounts receivable, net of allowance of $45 in 2007 and $181 in 2006
    120,038       96,993  
Related party receivables
    201       755  
Assets from risk management activities
    381       2,126  
Other current assets
    4,944       5,279  
 
           
Total current assets
    162,547       120,074  
 
               
Property, plant and equipment
               
Gas plants and buildings
    112,670       103,490  
Gathering and transmission systems
    576,972       529,776  
Other property, plant and equipment
    79,331       73,861  
Construction-in-progress
    103,621       85,277  
 
           
Total property, plant and equipment
    872,594       792,404  
Less accumulated depreciation
    (78,941 )     (58,370 )
 
           
Property, plant and equipment, net
    793,653       734,034  
 
               
Other assets:
               
Intangible assets, net of amortization of $6,636 in 2007 and $4,676 in 2006
    80,097       76,923  
Long-term assets from risk management activities
          1,674  
Other, net of amortization of debt issuance costs of $2,049 in 2007 and $946 in 2006
    16,566       17,212  
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries
          5,616  
Goodwill
    94,448       57,552  
 
           
Total other assets
    191,111       158,977  
 
               
 
           
TOTAL ASSETS
  $ 1,147,311     $ 1,013,085  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES & PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
               
Current Liabilities:
               
Accounts payable, accrued cost of gas and liquids and accrued liabilities
  $ 130,168     $ 117,254  
Related party payables
    2,624       280  
Escrow payable
    5,914       5,783  
Accrued taxes payable
    4,440       2,758  
Liabilities from risk management activities
    12,362       3,647  
Interest payable
    3,017       2,998  
Other current liabilities
    1,281       2,594  
 
           
Total current liabilities
    159,806       135,314  
 
               
Long-term liabilities from risk management activities
    5,982       145  
Other long-term liabilities
    16,115       269  
Long-term debt
    778,930       664,700  
 
               
Commitments and contingencies
               
 
               
Partners’ Capital:
               
Common units (30,728,076 and 21,969,480 units authorized; 28,930,545 and 19,620,396 units issued and outstanding at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006)
    173,761       42,192  
Class B common units (5,173,189 units authorized, issued and outstanding at December 31, 2006)
          60,671  
Class C common units (2,857,143 units authorized, issued and outstanding at December 31, 2006)
          59,992  
Subordinated units (19,103,896 units authorized, issued and outstanding at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006)
    25,041       43,240  
General partner interest
    5,219       5,543  
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
    (17,543 )     1,019  
 
           
Total partners’ capital
    186,478       212,657  
 
               
 
           
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
  $ 1,147,311     $ 1,013,085  
 
           
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

 


Table of Contents

Regency Energy Partners LP
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
Unaudited
(in thousands except unit data and per unit data)
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    June 30, 2007     June 30, 2006     June 30, 2007     June 30, 2006  
REVENUES
                               
Gas sales
  $ 195,870     $ 131,278     $ 363,253     $ 289,750  
NGL sales
    83,236       65,043       146,777       121,179  
Gathering, transportation and other fees, including related party amounts of $431 and $784 in 2007 and $597 and $1,116 in 2006
    17,884       14,730       37,763       27,434  
Net realized and unrealized loss from risk management activities
    (2,625 )     (2,425 )     (2,710 )     (4,082 )
Other
    7,171       6,032       12,881       11,643  
 
                       
Total revenues
    301,536       214,658       557,964       445,924  
 
                               
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES
                               
Cost of gas and liquids, including related party amounts of $7,755 and $13,173 in 2007 and $753 and $1,266 in 2006
    249,760       178,027       461,698       374,763  
Operation and maintenance
    11,008       8,382       21,932       17,827  
General and administrative
    19,293       6,923       26,144       12,339  
Loss on sale of assets
    532             2,340        
Management services termination fee
                      9,000  
Depreciation and amortization
    12,507       9,378       23,934       18,547  
 
                       
Total operating costs and expenses
    293,100       202,710       536,048       432,476  
 
                               
OPERATING INCOME
    8,436       11,948       21,916       13,448  
 
                               
Interest expense, net
    (15,961 )     (8,389 )     (30,846 )     (16,390 )
Other income and deductions, net
    173       201       283       383  
 
                       
 
                               
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES
    (7,352 )     3,760       (8,647 )     (2,559 )
 
                               
Income tax expense
    225             225        
 
                       
 
                               
NET INCOME (LOSS)
  $ (7,577 )   $ 3,760     $ (8,872 )   $ (2,559 )
 
                               
Less: Net income from January 1-31, 2006
                      1,564  
 
                       
Net income (loss) for partners
  $ (7,577 )   $ 3,760     $ (8,872 )   $ (4,123 )
 
                       
 
                               
General partner’s interest
    (152 )     75       (177 )     (82 )
 
                       
Limited partners’ interest
    (7,425 )     3,685       (8,695 )     (4,041 )
 
                       
 
                               
Basic and diluted earnings per unit:
                               
Net income (loss) allocated to common units
  $ (4,415 )   $ 1,623     $ (4,808 )   $ (1,802 )
Weighted average number of common units outstanding
    28,047,793       19,103,896       25,663,672       19,103,896  
Income (loss) per common unit
  $ (0.16 )   $ 0.08     $ (0.19 )   $ (0.09 )
Distributions declared per unit
  $ 0.38     $ 0.2217     $ 0.75     $ 0.5717  
 
                               
Net income (loss) allocated to subordinated units
  $ (3,010 )   $ 1,623     $ (3,887 )   $ (1,762 )
Weighted average number of subordinated units outstanding
    19,103,896       19,103,896       19,103,896       19,103,896  
Income (loss) per subordinated unit
  $ (0.16 )   $ 0.08     $ (0.20 )   $ (0.09 )
Distributions declared per unit
  $ 0.38     $ 0.2217     $ 0.75     $ 0.5717  
 
                               
Net income (loss) allocated to Class B common units
  $     $ 439     $     $ (477 )
Weighted average number of Class B common units outstanding
          5,173,189       1,314,733       5,173,189  
Income (loss) per Class B common unit
  $     $ 0.08     $     $ (0.09 )
Distributions declared per unit
  $     $     $     $  
 
                               
Net income (loss) allocated to Class C common units
  $     $     $     $  
Weighted average number of Class C common units outstanding
                615,627        
Income (loss) per Class C common unit
  $     $     $     $  
Distributions declared per unit
  $     $     $     $  
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

 


Table of Contents

Regency Energy Partners LP
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss
Unaudited
(in thousands)
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    June 30, 2007     June 30, 2006     June 30, 2007     June 30, 2006  
Net income (loss)
  $ (7,577 )   $ 3,760     $ (8,872 )   $ (2,559 )
Hedging losses reclassified to earnings
    2,870       1,909       2,816       2,722  
Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges
    (8,933 )     (10,504 )     (21,378 )     (6,077 )
 
                       
Comprehensive loss
  $ (13,640 )   $ (4,835 )   $ (27,434 )   $ (5,914 )
 
                       
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

 


Table of Contents

Regency Energy Partners LP
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Partners’ Capital
Unaudited
(in thousands except unit data)
                                                                                         
                                                                            Accumulated        
                                                                    General     Other        
    Units     Common     Class B     Class C     Subordinated     Partner     Comprehensive        
    Common     Class B     Class C     Subordinated     Unitholders     Unitholders     Unitholders     Unitholders     Interest     Income (Loss)     Total  
Balance — December 31, 2006
    19,620,396       5,173,189       2,857,143       19,103,896     $ 42,192     $ 60,671     $ 59,992     $ 43,240     $ 5,543     $ 1,019     $ 212,657  
Conversion of Class B and C to common units
    8,030,332       (5,173,189 )     (2,857,143 )           120,663       (60,671 )     (59,992 )                        
Issuance of common units for acquisitions
    751,597                         19,724                                     19,724  
Issuance of restricted common units
    546,000                                                              
Forfeitures of restricted common units
    (23,333 )                                                            
Exercise of common unit options
    5,553                                                              
Unit based compensation expenses
                            14,085                                     14,085  
General Partner contributions
                                                    515             515  
Partner distributions
                            (18,119 )                 (14,328 )     (662 )           (33,109 )
Net loss
                            (4,808 )                 (3,887 )     (177 )           (8,872 )
Other
                            24                   16                   40  
Net hedging activity reclassified to earnings
                                                          2,816       2,816  
Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges
                                                          (21,378 )     (21,378 )
 
                                                                 
Balance — June 30, 2007
    28,930,545                   19,103,896     $ 173,761     $     $     $ 25,041     $ 5,219     $ (17,543 )   $ 186,478  
 
                                                                 
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

 


Table of Contents

Regency Energy Partners LP
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Unaudited
(in thousands)
                 
    Six Months Ended  
    June 30, 2007     June 30, 2006  
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
               
Net loss
  $ (8,872 )   $ (2,559 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash flows provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    24,626       18,975  
Equity income
    (43 )     (220 )
Risk management portfolio valuation changes
    (591 )     (811 )
Loss on sale of assets
    2,340        
Unit based compensation expenses
    14,085       1,089  
Cash flow changes in current assets and liabilities:
               
Accrued revenues and accounts receivable
    (20,878 )     13,770  
Other current assets
    358       109  
Accounts payable, accrued cost of gas and liquids and accrued liabilities
    25,594       (11,743 )
Accrued taxes payable
    1,682       921  
Interest payable
    19        
Other current liabilities
    (1,783 )     (735 )
Proceeds from early termination of interest rate swap
          3,550  
Other assets
    (498 )     2,382  
 
           
Net cash flows provided by operating activities
    36,039       24,728  
 
           
 
               
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
               
Capital expenditures
    (65,911 )     (61,290 )
Acquisition of Pueblo Midstream Gas Corporation
    (54,952 )      
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries
          (50 )
Acquisition of investment in unconsolidated subsidiary, net of cash
    (5,000 )     96  
Restricted cash
          226  
Proceeds from sale of assets
    10,396        
 
           
Net cash flows used in investing activities
    (115,467 )     (61,018 )
 
           
 
               
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
               
Net borrowings under revolving credit facilities
    114,230       39,400  
Repayment under loan agreement
          (350 )
Partner contributions
    515        
Partner distributions
    (33,109 )     (8,735 )
Issuance of common units for acquisition of Pueblo Midstream Gas Corporation
    19,724        
Debt issuance costs
          (189 )
Proceeds from IPO, net of issuance costs
          256,953  
Capital reimbursement to HM Capital
          (195,757 )
Working capital distribution to HM Capital
          (48,000 )
Capital reimbursement to HM Capital
          (4,195 )
Proceeds from exercise of over allotment option
          26,163  
Over allotment option proceeds to HM Capital
          (26,163 )
 
           
Net cash flows provided by financing activities
    101,360       39,127  
 
           
 
               
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
    21,932       2,837  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    9,139       3,686  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 31,071     $ 6,523  
 
           
 
               
Supplemental cash flow information
               
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized
  $ 29,966     $ 15,824  
Non-cash capital expenditures in accounts payable
    11,943       9,225  
Non-cash capital expenditures for consolidation of investment in previously unconsolidated subsidiary
    5,650        
Non-cash capital expenditure upon entering into a capital lease obligation
    3,000        
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

 


Table of Contents

Regency Energy Partners LP
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
     Organization and Basis of Presentation. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements presented herein contain the results of Regency Energy Partners LP, a Delaware limited partnership (“Partnership”), and its predecessor, Regency Gas Services LLC (“Predecessor”). The Partnership was formed on September 8, 2005. On February 3, 2006, in conjunction with its initial public offering of securities (“IPO”), the Predecessor was converted to a limited partnership, Regency Gas Services LP (“RGS”), and became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Partnership. The Partnership and its subsidiaries are engaged in the business of gathering, treating, processing, transporting, and marketing natural gas and natural gas liquids (“NGLs”). References to “Regency Energy Partners,” the “Partnership,” “we,” “our,” “us” and similar terms, refer to Regency Energy Partners LP and its subsidiaries. References to “our general partner” or the “General Partner” refer to Regency GP LP, the general partner of the Partnership. References to the “Managing General Partner” refer to Regency GP LLC, the general partner of the General Partner, which effectively manages the business and affairs of the Partnership.
     On June 18, 2007, Regency GP Acquirer LP, an indirect subsidiary of General Electric Capital Corporation (“GECC”) acquired 91.3 percent of both the member interest in our Managing General Partner and the outstanding limited partner interests in our General Partner from Fund V and other affiliates of HM Capital Partners LLC (“HM Capital”). It also acquired from members of our management the remaining 8.7 percent of the member interest in the Managing General Partner and the remaining 8.7 percent of the outstanding limited partner interests in our General Partner. At the same time, Regency LP Acquirer LP, another indirect wholly owned subsidiary of GECC, acquired, in transactions with HM Capital and affiliates and members of our management, 17,763,809 of our outstanding subordinated units, of which 1,222,717 subordinated units were owned directly or indirectly by certain members of our management team.
     In connection with these transactions, certain officers of the Managing General Partner agreed pursuant to a purchase and sale agreement (the “Management Agreement”) either to sell their interests in the General Partner for cash or exchange their interests in the General Partner for Class B limited partner interests in Regency GP Acquirer LP. At the same time, Regency GP Acquirer LP entered into a Subscription Agreement (the “Subscription Agreement”) with certain officers and other key employees pursuant to which Regency GP Acquirer LP agreed to sell to those officers and employees Class B limited partner interests proportional, in the aggregate, to the General Partner interests that it purchased for cash under the Management Agreement, as well as a limited number of subordinated units. As a consequence, it is anticipated that officers and key employees will acquire, pursuant to the Subscription Agreement, Class B Units of Regency GP Acquirer LP that entitle them to an indirect 8.2 percent ownership interest in the General Partner and will acquire 58,000 subordinated units.
     GE Energy Financial Services is a unit of GECC which is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the General Electric Company. For simplicity, we refer to Regency GP Acquirer LP, Regency LP Acquirer LP and GE Energy Financial Services collectively as “GE EFS.” We refer to these acquisition transactions as the “GE EFS Acquisition.”
     Affiliates of HM Capital have retained the 8,148,672 common units owned by them and agreed not to sell or otherwise distribute 3,406,099 common units for a period of one year and 4,692,417 common units for a period of six months. The Partnership has not recorded any adjustments to reflect GE EFS’s acquisition of the HM Capital’s interest in the Partnership or the related transactions.
     While none of the Partnership, the General Partner or the Managing General Partner was a party to the GE EFS Acquisition, the Partnership has been advised that: (i) the aggregate purchase price paid by GE EFS to the HM Capital affiliate was $603,000,000 in cash; and (ii) the parties agreed to prorate any distributions that the Partnership may make on subordinated units and the general partner interest with respect to the second quarter of 2007.
     The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the assets, liabilities, results of operations and cash flows of the Partnership and its wholly owned subsidiaries. The Partnership operates and manages its business as two reportable segments: a) gathering and processing, and b) transportation.

 


Table of Contents

     The unaudited financial information as of June 30, 2007, and for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2007 has been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. In the opinion of the Partnership’s management, such financial information reflects all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and the results of operations for such interim periods in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). All intercompany items and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Partnership reclassified interest payable at December 31, 2006 to conform to the current year presentation.
     Use of Estimates. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with GAAP and, of necessity, include the use of estimates and assumptions by management. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
     Intangible Assets. The total gross carrying amount of intangible assets that were subject to amortization was $86,733,000 at June 30, 2007 and $81,599,000 at December 31, 2006. Aggregate amortization expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 was $986,000 and $1,987,000, respectively.
     Income Taxes. The Partnership is generally not subject to income taxes, except as disclosed below, because its income is taxed directly to its partners. Effective January 1, 2007, the Partnership became subject to the gross margin tax enacted by the state of Texas on May 1, 2006. In addition, the Partnership has wholly-owned subsidiaries that are subject to income tax and provides for income taxes using the liability method for these entities. Accordingly, deferred taxes are recorded for differences between the tax and book basis that will reverse in future periods. The Partnership recorded a deferred tax liability of $9,182,000 as of June 30, 2007 related to depreciation of property, plant and equipment.
     Recently Issued Accounting Standards. In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FIN No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — An Interpretation of FASB Statement 109”, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material impact on the Partnership’s consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
     In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”), which provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 157 applies whenever another standard requires (or permits) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. This standard does not expand the use of fair value to any new circumstances. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Partnership is currently evaluating the potential effects of the adoption of this standard on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
     In January 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS No. 159”), which permits entities to measure many financial instruments and certain other assets and liabilities at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Partnership is currently evaluating the potential effects of the adoption of this standard on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows that are not currently required to be measured at fair value.

 


Table of Contents

2. Income (Loss) per Limited Partner Unit
     The following table shows the amounts used in computing basic and diluted limited partner income (loss) per unit.
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    June 30, 2007     June 30, 2006     June 30, 2007     June 30, 2006  
    (in thousands except unit data and per unit data)  
Net income (loss) for partners
  $ (7,577 )   $ 3,760     $ (8,872 )   $ (4,123 )
Adjustments:
                               
General partner’s interest
    (152 )     75       (177 )     (82 )
 
                       
Limited partners’ interest in net income (loss)
  $ (7,425 )   $ 3,685     $ (8,695 )   $ (4,041 )
 
                       
 
                               
Net income (loss) allocated to common unitholders
  $ (4,415 )   $ 1,623     $ (4,808 )   $ (1,802 )
Weighted average common limited partner units – basic
    28,047,793       19,103,896       25,663,672       19,103,896  
Common limited partners’ basic income (loss) per unit
  $ (0.16 )   $ 0.08     $ (0.19 )   $ (0.09 )
 
                               
Weighted average common limited partner units – basic
    28,047,793       19,103,896       25,663,672       19,103,896  
Dilutive effect of restricted units and common unit options
          66,206              
Weighted average common limited partner units – dilutive
    28,047,793       19,170,102       25,663,672       19,103,896  
Common limited partners’ dilutive earnings (loss) per unit
  $ (0.16 )   $ 0.08     $ (0.19 )   $ (0.09 )
 
                               
Net income (loss) allocated to subordinated unitholders
  $ (3,010 )   $ 1,623     $ (3,887 )   $ (1,762 )
Weighted average subordinated limited partner units – basic and diluted
    19,103,896       19,103,896       19,103,896       19,103,896  
Subordinated limited partners’ basic and diluted earnings (loss) per unit
  $ (0.16 )   $ 0.08     $ (0.20 )   $ (0.09 )
 
                               
Net income (loss) allocated to Class B unitholders
  $     $ 439     $     $ (477 )
Weighted average Class B common units outstanding *
          5,173,189       1,314,733       5,173,189  
Class B common limited partners’ basic and diluted earnings (loss) per unit
  $     $ 0.08     $     $ (0.09 )
 
                               
Net income (loss) allocated to Class C unitholders
  $     $     $     $  
Weighted average Class C common units outstanding *
                615,627        
Class C common limited partners’ basic and diluted earnings (loss) per unit
  $     $     $     $  
 
                               
Potentially dilutive securities excluded from diluted loss per unit:
                               
Restricted common units
    355,000             355,000       432,500  
Common unit options
    868,568             868,568       731,500  
 
*   Converted into common units during the three months ended March 31, 2007.
     Loss per unit for the six months ended June 30, 2006 reflects only the five months since the closing of the Partnership’s IPO on February 3, 2006. For convenience, January 31, 2006 has been used as the date of the change in ownership. Accordingly, results for January 2006 have been excluded from the calculation of loss per unit. While the non-vested (or restricted) units are deemed to be outstanding for legal purposes, they have been excluded from the calculation of basic loss per unit in accordance with SFAS No. 128.
     In accordance with SFAS No. 128, the Partnership allocates net income or loss to each class of equity security in proportion to the amount of distributions earned during that period. Since the Class B common units were deemed to be outstanding for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, a portion of net loss was allocated to this class of equity because they were not expressly prohibited from receiving distributions. The Partnership Agreement requires that the general partner shall receive a 100 percent allocation of income until its capital account is made whole for all of the net losses allocated to it in prior tax years.
3. Acquisitions and Dispositions
     Palafox Joint Venture. The Partnership acquired the outstanding interest in the Palafox Joint Venture not owned by it (50 percent) for $5,000,000 effective February 1, 2007. The Partnership allocated $10,057,000 to gathering and transmission systems in the three months ended March 31, 2007. The allocated amount consists of the investment in unconsolidated subsidiary of $5,650,000 immediately prior to the Partnership’s acquisition and the Partnership’s $5,000,000 purchase of the remaining interest offset by $593,000 of working capital accounts acquired.
     Asset Dispositions. The Partnership sold selected non-core pipelines, related rights of way and contracts located in south Texas for $5,340,000 on March 31, 2007 and recorded a one-time loss on sale of $1,808,000. Additionally, the Partnership sold two small gathering systems and associated contracts located in the Midcontinent region for $1,750,000 on May 31, 2007 and recorded a loss on the sale of

 


Table of Contents

$532,000. The Partnership also sold its 34 mile NGL pipeline located in east Texas for $3,000,000 on June 29, 2007 and simultaneously entered into transportation and operating agreements with the buyer. The Partnership accounted for this transaction as a sale-leaseback whereby the $3,000,000 gain was deferred and will be amortized to earnings over a twenty year period. The Partnership recorded $3,000,000 to gathering and transmission systems and the related obligations under capital lease.
     Acquisition of Pueblo Midstream Gas Corporation. On April 2, 2007, the Partnership and its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Pueblo Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Pueblo Holdings”), entered into a definitive Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”) with Bear Cub Investments, LLC to acquire all the outstanding equity of Pueblo Midstream Gas Corporation, a Texas corporation (“Pueblo”) (the “Pueblo Acquisition”). Pueblo owned and operated natural gas gathering, treating and processing assets located in south Texas. These assets consist of a 75 MMcf/d gas processing and treating facility (“Fashing Processing Plant”), 33 miles of gathering pipelines and approximately 6,000 horsepower of compression.
     The purchase price for the Pueblo Acquisition consisted of (1) the issuance of 751,597 common units of the Partnership to the Members, valued at $19,724,000 and (2) the payment of $34,844,000 in cash, exclusive of outstanding Pueblo liabilities of $9,822,000 and certain working capital amounts acquired of $384,000. The cash portion of the consideration was financed out of the proceeds of the Partnership’s revolving credit facility.
     The Pueblo Acquisition offers the opportunity to reroute gas to one of the Partnership’s existing gas processing plants which is expected to provide cost savings. The total purchase price of $64,774,000 was allocated preliminarily as follows based on estimates of the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
         
    At April 2, 2007  
    (in thousands)  
Current assets
  $ 384  
Gas plants and buildings
    8,994  
Gathering and transmission systems
    13,078  
Other property, plant and equipment
    180  
Intangible assets subject to amortization (contracts)
    5,242  
Goodwill
    36,896  
 
     
Total assets acquired
  $ 64,774  
Current liabilities
    (330 )
Long-term liabilities
    (9,492 )
 
     
Net assets acquired
  $ 54,952  
 
     
     The final purchase price allocation, which management expects to complete by December 31, 2007, may differ from the above estimates. In connection with the Pueblo Acquisition, the Partnership recorded $9,182,000 in deferred tax liabilities for differences between the book and tax basis for long-lived assets.
     The following unaudited pro forma financial information has been prepared as if the acquisition of Pueblo had occurred at the beginning of 2006. Such unaudited pro forma information does not purport to be indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the transactions to which the Partnership is giving pro forma effect actually occurred on the date referred to above or the results of operations that may be expected in the future.

 


Table of Contents

                         
    Pro Forma Results for the   Pro Forma Results for the   Pro Forma Results for the
    period from April 1, 2006   period from January 1, 2006   period from January 1, 2007
    through June 30, 2006   through June 30, 2006   through June 30, 2007
    (in thousands except earnings (loss) per unit data)
Revenue
  $ 218,511     $ 453,630     $ 561,685  
Net income (loss)
    3,774       (2,530 )     (8,563 )
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common unit
    0.10       (0.10 )     (0.18 )
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per subordinated unit
    0.09       (0.10 )     (0.19 )
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per Class B common unit
    0.09       (0.10 )      
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per Class C common unit
                 
     In connection with the Pueblo Acquisition, the Partnership entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) with the sellers. The Registration Rights Agreement provides these persons with rights under the Securities Act of 1933 to register the offering and sale of the common units of the Partnership that were issued to the sellers pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement.
4. Risk Management Activities
     As of June 30, 2007, the Partnership’s hedging positions reduce exposure to variability of future commodity prices through 2009. The hedging positions through 2008 have been designated and accounted for as SFAS No. 133 cash flow hedges. The net fair value of the Partnership’s risk management activities constituted a liability of $17,963,000 as of June 30, 2007. The Partnership expects to reclassify $11,537,000 of hedging losses into revenues or interest expense, net from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the next twelve months. The Partnership has determined that ineffectiveness for certain hedges is immaterial. In the six months ended June 30, 2007, we recognized immaterial gains related to hedged forecasted transactions that did not occur by the end of the originally specified period.
     Upon the early termination of an interest rate swap with a notional debt amount of $200,000,000 that was effective from April 2007 through March 2009, the Partnership received $3,550,000 in cash from the counterparty. A portion of this amount was reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to interest expense, net over the originally projected period (i.e., April 2007 through March 2009) of the hedged forecasted transaction or when it is determined the hedged forecasted transaction is probable of not occurring. The Partnership reclassified $111,000 and $301,000 from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), reducing interest expense, net in the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively.

 


Table of Contents

5. Long-Term Debt
     Long-term debt obligations of the Partnership are as follows:
                 
    June 30, 2007     December 31, 2006  
    (in thousands)  
Senior notes
  $ 550,000     $ 550,000  
Term loans
    50,000       50,000  
Revolving loans
    178,930       64,700  
 
           
Total
    778,930       664,700  
Less: current portion
           
 
           
Long-term debt
  $ 778,930     $ 664,700  
 
           
 
               
Availability
               
Total credit facility limit
  $ 300,000     $ 300,000  
Term loans
    (50,000 )     (50,000 )
Revolver loans
    (178,930 )     (64,700 )
Letters of credit
    (21,802 )     (5,183 )
 
           
Total available
  $ 49,268     $ 180,117  
 
           
     The outstanding balances of term debt and revolver debt under the credit facility bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin or Alternative Base Rate (equivalent to the US prime lending rate) plus a margin, or a combination of both. The weighted average interest rates for the revolving and term loan facilities, including interest rate swap settlements, commitment fees, and amortization of debt issuance costs were 8.64 percent and 7.21 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and 8.54 percent and 7.26 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The outstanding balances of the senior notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 8.375 percent.
     During the months preceding the GE EFS Acquisition, the Partnership deferred plans for an equity offering. As a result, the Partnership became concerned that at June 30, 2007, the Partnership’s leverage and interest coverage ratios might be out of compliance with financial covenants in the credit facility. Accordingly, the Partnership sought and obtained a waiver prior to and for the measurement period ending June 30, 2007. At June 30, 2007, the Partnership was in compliance with the covenants of the credit facility and the senior notes.
     The Partnership and Regency Energy Finance Corp. (“Finance Corp”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of RGS, are co-issuers of the senior notes. Finance Corp. does not have any operations of any kind and will not have any revenue other than as may be incidental as a co-issuer of the senior notes. Since the Partnership has no independent operations, the guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several and there are no subsidiaries of the Partnership that do not guarantee the senior notes, the Partnership has not included condensed consolidated financial information of guarantors of the senior notes.
6. Commitments and Contingencies
     Legal. Blackbrush Oil & Gas LLC (“BBOG”), owned by an affiliate of HM Capital that was the seller in our acquisition of TexStar Field Services, L.P., and certain of its subsidiaries are defendants in a wrongful death action styled Takas v. Strait Energy Services LLC et al. brought in state district court in Jim Wells County, Texas. The claim for both actual and punitive damages is made on behalf of the wife of the driver of a tractor trailer truck who was killed when the truck was struck by a train at a railway crossing. The truck was owned by a subcontractor working on, and was enroute to, a construction site relating to a pipeline owned by an entity that was then a subsidiary of TexStar. This accident occurred on July 15, 2005, prior to our acquisition of TexStar on August 15, 2006. One of our subsidiaries (Regency Frio NewLine LP), has now been named as a defendant in the litigation. We have retained counsel to file responses, and notified our insurance carrier regarding this matter. We do not expect it to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or our results of operations.

 


Table of Contents

     The Partnership is involved in various claims and lawsuits incidental to its business. In the opinion of management, these claims and lawsuits in the aggregate will not have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
     Escrow Payable. At June 30, 2007, $5,912,000 remained in escrow pending the completion by El Paso Field Services, LP (“El Paso”) of environmental remediation projects pursuant to the purchase and sale agreement (“El Paso PSA”) related to the assets in north Louisiana and in the mid-continent area. In the El Paso PSA, El Paso indemnified the predecessor of our operating partnership RGS against losses arising from pre-closing and known environmental liabilities subject to a limit of $84,000,000 and subject to certain deductible limits. Upon completion of a Phase II environmental study, RGS notified El Paso of remediation obligations amounting to $1,800,000 with respect to known environmental matters and $3,600,000 with respect to pre-closing environmental liabilities. Upon satisfactory completion of the remediation by El Paso, the amount held in escrow will be released.
     Environmental. A Phase I environmental study was performed on the Waha assets in connection with the pre-acquisition due diligence process in 2004. Most of the identified environmental contamination had either been remediated or was being remediated by the previous owners or operators of the properties. The estimated potential environmental remediation costs at specific locations range from $1,900,000 to $3,100,000. No governmental agency has required the Partnership to undertake these remediation efforts. Management believes that the likelihood that it will be liable for any significant potential remediation liabilities identified in the study is remote. Separately, the Partnership acquired an environmental pollution liability insurance policy in connection with the acquisition to cover any undetected or unknown pollution discovered in the future. The policy covers clean-up costs and damages to third parties, and has a 10-year term (expiring 2014) with a $10,000,000 limit subject to certain deductibles.
7. Related Party Transactions
     Subsequent to the GE EFS Acquisition, HM Capital continues to hold over ten percent of the Partnership’s outstanding units, and accordingly, HM Capital and its affiliates are considered to be a related party. BBOG is a natural gas producer on the Partnership’s gas gathering and processing system. At the time of the Partnership’s acquisition of TexStar, BBOG entered into an agreement providing for the long term dedication of the production from its leases to the Partnership. All of the Partnership’s related party receivables, payables, revenues and expenses as disclosed in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements relate to BBOG. BlackBrush Energy, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of HM Capital, subleases office space to the Partnership for which it paid $40,000 and $80,000 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2007.
     The employees operating the assets of the Partnership and its subsidiaries and all those providing staff or support services are employees of Regency GP LLC, the Partnership’s managing general partner. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, the managing general partner receives a monthly reimbursement for all direct and indirect expenses that it incurs on behalf of the Partnership. Reimbursements of $7,189,000 and $3,438,000 were recorded in the Partnership’s financial statements during three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and reimbursements of $13,238,000 and $6,314,000 were recorded in the Partnership’s financial statements during the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 as operating expenses or general and administrative expenses, as appropriate.
     The Partnership made cash distributions of $16,152,000 and $4,752,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 to HM Capital and affiliates as a result of their ownership in the Partnership. Concurrent with the closing of the Partnership’s IPO in three months ended March 31, 2006, the Partnership paid $9,000,000 to an affiliate of HM Capital Partners to terminate a management services contract with a remaining tenor of 9 years.
8. Segment Information
     The Partnership has two reportable segments: i) gathering and processing and ii) transportation. Gathering and processing involves the collection of hydrocarbons from producer wells across the five operating regions and transportation of it to a plant where water and other impurities such as hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide are removed. Treated gas is then processed to remove the natural gas liquids. The treated and processed natural gas then is transported to market separately from the natural gas liquids. The Partnership aggregates the

 


Table of Contents

results of its gathering and processing activities across five geographic regions into a single reporting segment.
     The transportation segment uses pipelines to transport natural gas from receipt points on its system to interconnections with larger pipelines or trading hubs and other markets. The Partnership performs transportation services for shipping customers under firm or interruptible arrangements. In either case, revenues are primarily fee based and involve minimal direct exposure to commodity price fluctuations. The Partnership also purchases natural gas at the inlets to the pipeline and sells this gas at its outlets. The north Louisiana intrastate pipeline operated by this segment serves the Partnership’s gathering and processing facilities in the same area and those transactions create the intersegment revenues shown in the table below.
     Management evaluates the performance of each segment and makes capital allocation decisions through the separate consideration of segment margin and operation and maintenance expenses. Segment margin is defined as total revenues, including service fees, less cost of gas and liquids. Management believes segment margin is an important measure because it is directly related to volumes and commodity price changes. Operation and maintenance expenses are a separate measure used by management to evaluate operating performance of field operations. Direct labor, insurance, property taxes, repair and maintenance, utilities and contract services comprise the most significant portion of operation and maintenance expenses. These expenses are largely independent of the volume throughput but fluctuate depending on the activities performed during a specific period. The Partnership does not deduct operation and maintenance expenses from total revenues in calculating segment margin because management separately evaluates commodity volume and price changes in segment margin.
     Results for each statement of operations period, together with amounts related to balance sheets for each segment, are shown below.

 


Table of Contents

                                         
    Gathering and                
    Processing   Transportation   Corporate   Eliminations   Total
    (in thousands)
External Revenue
                                       
For the three months ended June 30, 2007
  $ 212,667     $ 88,869     $     $     $ 301,536  
For the three months ended June 30, 2006
    147,762       66,896                   214,658  
For the six months ended June 30, 2007
    389,786       168,178                   557,964  
For the six months ended June 30, 2006
    311,628       134,296                   445,924  
Intersegment Revenue
                                       
For the three months ended June 30, 2007
          33,183             (33,183 )      
For the three months ended June 30, 2006
          5,175             (5,175 )      
For the six months ended June 30, 2007
          48,001             (48,001 )      
For the six months ended June 30, 2006
          13,645             (13,645 )      
Cost of Gas and Liquids
                                       
For the three months ended June 30, 2007
    174,260       75,500                   249,760  
For the three months ended June 30, 2006
    121,848       56,179                   178,027  
For the six months ended June 30, 2007
    321,202       140,496                   461,698  
For the six months ended June 30, 2006
    261,072       113,691                   374,763  
Segment Margin
                                       
For the three months ended June 30, 2007
    38,407       13,369                   51,776  
For the three months ended June 30, 2006
    25,914       10,717                   36,631  
For the six months ended June 30, 2007
    68,584       27,682                   96,266  
For the six months ended June 30, 2006
    50,556       20,605                   71,161  
Operation and Maintenance
                                       
For the three months ended June 30, 2007
    9,519       1,489                   11,008  
For the three months ended June 30, 2006
    7,280       1,102                   8,382  
For the six months ended June 30, 2007
    18,633       3,299                   21,932  
For the six months ended June 30, 2006
    15,578       2,249                   17,827  
Depreciation and Amortization
                                       
For the three months ended June 30, 2007
    8,846       3,358       303             12,507  
For the three months ended June 30, 2006
    6,102       3,072       204             9,378  
For the six months ended June 30, 2007
    16,731       6,607       596             23,934  
For the six months ended June 30, 2006
    12,112       6,059       376             18,547  
Assets
                                       
June 30, 2007
    746,388       338,060       62,863             1,147,311  
December 31, 2006
    648,116       316,038       48,931             1,013,085  
Investments in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
                                       
June 30, 2007
                             
December 31, 2006
    5,616                         5,616  
Expenditures for Long-Lived Assets
                                       
For the six months ended June 30, 2007
    120,653       4,800       410             125,863  
For the six months ended June 30, 2006
    37,569       22,865       856             61,290  
     The table below provides a reconciliation of total segment margin to net income (loss).
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    June 30, 2007     June 30, 2006     June 30, 2007     June 30, 2006  
    (in thousands)  
Total segment margin
  $ 51,776     $ 36,631     $ 96,266     $ 71,161  
Operation and maintenance
    (11,008 )     (8,382 )     (21,932 )     (17,827 )
General and administrative
    (19,293 )     (6,923 )     (26,144 )     (12,339 )
Management services termination fee
                      (9,000 )
Loss on sale of assets
    (532 )           (2,340 )      
Depreciation and amortization
    (12,507 )     (9,378 )     (23,934 )     (18,547 )
 
                       
Operating income
    8,436       11,948       21,916       13,448  
Interest expense, net
    (15,961 )     (8,389 )     (30,846 )     (16,390 )
Other income and deductions, net
    173       201       283       383  
Income tax expense
    (225 )           (225 )      
 
                       
Net income (loss)
  $ (7,577 )   $ 3,760     $ (8,872 )   $ (2,559 )
 
                       

 


Table of Contents

9. Equity-Based Compensation
     In December 2005, the compensation committee of the board of directors of the Partnership’s managing general partner approved a long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”) for the Partnership’s employees, directors and consultants covering an aggregate of 2,865,584 common units. All outstanding, unvested LTIP awards at the time of the GE EFS Acquisition vested upon the change of control of the managing general partner. As a result, the Partnership recorded a one-time charge of $11,928,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2007. The Partnership recorded in general and administrative expense LTIP expense of $12,983,000 and $14,085,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively. LTIP awards made prior to the GE EFS Acquisition generally vested on the basis of one-third of the award each year while awards made subsequent to the GE EFS Acquisition vest on the basis of one-fourth of the award each year. Options expire ten years after the grant date.
     The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model. The following assumptions apply to the options granted during the periods presented.
                                 
    Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended  
    June 30, 2007   June 30, 2006   June 30, 2007   June 30, 2006
Weighted average expected life (years)
    4       4       4       4  
Weighted average expected dividend per unit
  $ 1.52     $ 1.40     $ 1.51     $ 1.40  
Weighted average grant date fair value per option
  $ 2.50     $ 1.52     $ 2.31     $ 1.20  
Weighted average risk free rate
    4.6 %     4.25 %     4.6 %     4.25 %
Weighted average expected volatility
    16.0 %     15.0 %     16.0 %     15.0 %
Weighted average expected forfeiture rate
    11.0 %     5.0 %     11.0 %     5.0 %
     The Partnership will make distributions to non-vested restricted common units at the same rate as the common units. Restricted common units are subject to contractual restrictions against transfer which lapse over time; non-vested restricted units are subject to forfeitures on termination of employment. Upon the exercise of the common unit options, the Partnership intends to settle these obligations with common units on a net basis. Accordingly, the Partnership expects to recognize $9,978,000 of compensation expense related to the grants under LTIP ratably over the future vesting period.
     The common unit options and restricted (non-vested) common units activity for the six months ended June 30, 2007 are as follows:
                                 
            Weighted   Weighted   Aggregate
            Average   Average   Intrinsic
            Exercise   Contractual   Value *
Common Unit Options   Units   Price   Term (Years)   (in thousands)
Outstanding at beginning of period
    909,600     $ 21.06                  
Granted
    21,500       27.18                  
Exercised
    (20,634 )     20.30             $ 158  
Forfeited or expired
    (41,898 )     21.85                  
 
                               
Outstanding at end of period
    868,568       21.19       8.7       10,417  
 
                               
Exercisable at end of period
    868,568       21.19       8.7       10,417  
 
*   Intrinsic value equals the closing market price of a unit at period end less the option strike price, multiplied by the number of unit options outstanding as of the end of each period presented. Unit options with a strike price greater than the closing market price at period end are excluded.
     The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted in the six months ended June 30, 2007 was $50,000.

 


Table of Contents

                 
            Weighted
            Average
            Grant Date
Restricted (Non-Vested) Common Units   Units   Fair Value
Outstanding at beginning of period
    516,500     $ 21.06  
Granted
    546,000       30.22  
Vested
    (684,167 )     22.91  
Forfeited or expired
    (23,333 )     21.07  
 
               
Outstanding at end of period
    355,000       31.58  
 
               
Aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding at end of period (in thousands)
          $ 11,211  
10. Subsequent Events
     Partner Distributions. On July 27, 2007, the Partnership declared a distribution of $0.38 per common and subordinated unit, payable on August 14, 2007 to unitholders of record at the close of business on August 7, 2007.
     Equity Offering. On July 26, 2007, the Partnership sold 10,000,000 common units for $32.05 per unit. After deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of $12,820,000, the Partnership received $307,680,000 from this sale, excluding the general partner’s proportionate capital contribution of $6,279,000 and estimated offering expenses of $1,500,000. On July 31, 2007, the Partnership sold an additional 1,500,000 common units for $32.05 per unit as a part of the underwriters exercising their option to purchase additional units. The Partnership received $46,152,000 from this sale after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and excluding the general partner’s proportionate capital contribution of $942,000.
     The Partnership used a portion of these proceeds to repay amounts outstanding under the term ($50,000,000) and revolving credit facility ($178,930,000). In July 2007, the Partnership reclassified $777,000 from accumulated other comprehensive loss as a reduction to interest expense, net.
     On August 1, 2007, the Partnership initiated a notification process to its senior note holders to repurchase $192,500,000, or 35 percent of the amount outstanding, which will require the Partnership to pay an early redemption penalty of $16,122,000. Until the repurchase of the senior notes is complete, the Partnership may use the remaining net proceeds of $130,623,000 to fund working capital needs, growth capital projects or acquisitions.

 


Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
     The following discussion analyzes our financial condition and results of operations. You should read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes included elsewhere in this document.
OVERVIEW
     We are a Delaware limited partnership formed to capitalize on opportunities in the midstream sector of the natural gas industry. We own and operate significant natural gas gathering and processing assets in north Louisiana, east Texas, south Texas, west Texas and the mid-continent region of the United States, which includes Kansas, Oklahoma, Colorado, and the Texas Panhandle. We are engaged in gathering, processing, marketing and transporting natural gas and natural gas liquids, or NGLs. We connect natural gas wells of producers to our gathering systems through which we transport the natural gas to processing plants operated by us or by third parties. The processing plants separate NGLs from the natural gas. We then sell and deliver the natural gas and NGLs to a variety of markets. References to “Regency Energy Partners,” the “Partnership,” “we,” “our,” “us” and similar terms, refer to Regency Energy Partners LP and its subsidiaries. References to “our general partner” or the “General Partner” refer to Regency GP LP, the general partner of the Partnership. References to the “Managing General Partner” refer to Regency GP LLC, the general partner of the General Partner, which effectively manages the business and affairs of the Partnership.
     In February 2006, we consummated the initial public offering of our common units. In August 2006, we acquired all the outstanding equity of TexStar Field Services, L.P. and its general partner, TexStar GP, LLC (the “TexStar Acquisition”), from HMTF Gas Partners II, L.P. (“HMTF Gas Partners”), an affiliate of HM Capital Partners LLC (“HM Capital”). Hicks Muse Equity Fund V, L.P. (“Fund V”) and its affiliates, through HM Capital, controlled our general partner at the time. At the time, Fund V controlled HMTF Gas Partners through HM Capital. Because our acquisition of TexStar was a transaction between commonly controlled entities, we have accounted for the transaction in a manner similar to a pooling of interests, and we have updated our historical financial statements to include the financial condition and results of operations of TexStar for periods during which common control existed (December 1, 2004 to June 18, 2007).
     On June 18, 2007, Regency GP Acquirer LP, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of General Electric Credit Corporation (“GECC”), indirectly acquired 91.3 percent of both the member interest in our Managing General Partner and the outstanding limited partner interests in our General Partner from Fund V and other affiliates of HM Capital. It also indirectly acquired from members of our management the remaining 8.7 percent of the member interest in the Managing General Partner and the remaining 8.7 percent of the outstanding limited partner interests in our General Partner. At the same time, Regency LP Acquirer, another indirect wholly owned subsidiary of GECC, acquired, in transactions with HM Capital affiliates and members of our management, 17,763,809 of our outstanding subordinated units, of which 1,222,717 subordinated units were owned directly or indirectly by certain members of our management team. Members of our management team re-acquired or agreed to acquire interests in an affiliate of GE EFS that entitle them to an indirect 8.2 percent ownership interest in the Managing General Partner and the General Partner, as well as approximately 58,000 subordinated units.
     GE Energy Financial Services is a unit of GECC which is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the General Electric Company. For simplicity, we refer to Regency GP Acquirer LP, Regency LP Acquirer LP and GE Energy Financial Services collectively as “GE EFS.” We refer to these acquisition transactions as the “GE EFS Acquisition.”
     Affiliates of HM Capital have retained the 8,148,672 common units owned by them and have agreed not to sell or otherwise distribute 3,406,099 common units for a period of one year and 4,692,417 common units for a period of six months.
     While none of the Partnership, the General Partner or the Managing General Partner was a party to the GE EFS Acquisition, the Partnership has been advised that: (i) the aggregate purchase price paid by GE EFS to the HM Capital was $603,000,000 in cash and (ii) the parties agreed to prorate any distributions that the Partnership may make on subordinated units and the general partner interest with respect to the second quarter of 2007.
     In connection with the GE EFS Acquisition, certain officers of the Managing General Partner agreed pursuant to a purchase and sale agreement (the “Management Agreement”) either to sell their interests in the General Partner for cash or to exchange their interests in the General Partner for Class B limited partner interests in Regency GP Acquirer LP. At the same time, Regency GP Acquirer LP entered into a Subscription Agreement (the “Subscription Agreement”) with certain officers and other key employees pursuant to which Regency GP Acquirer LP agreed to sell Class B limited partner interests proportional, in the aggregate, to the General Partner interests that it purchased for

 


Table of Contents

cash under the Management Agreement. As a consequence, it is anticipated that, following the closing under the Subscription Agreement, officers and key employees will own Class B Units of Regency GP Acquirer LP that entitle them to an indirect 8.2 percent ownership interest in the General Partner.
EQUITY OFFERING
     On July 26, 2007, the Partnership sold 10,000,000 common units for $32.05 per unit. After deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of $12,820,000, the Partnership received $307,680,000 from this sale, excluding the general partner’s proportionate capital contribution of $6,279,000 and estimated offering expenses of $1,500,000. On July 31, 2007, the Partnership sold an additional 1,500,000 common units for $32.05 per unit as the underwriters exercised their option to purchase additional units. The Partnership received $46,152,000 from this sale after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and excluding the general partner’s proportionate capital contribution of $942,000.
     The Partnership used a portion of these proceeds to repay amounts outstanding under the term ($50,000,000) and revolving credit facility ($178,930,000). On August 1, 2007, the Partnership initiated a notification process to its senior note holders to repurchase $192,500,000, or 35 percent of the amount outstanding, which will require the Partnership to pay an early redemption penalty of $16,122,000. Until the repurchase of the senior notes is complete, the Partnership may use the remaining net proceeds of $130,623,000 to fund working capital needs, growth capital projects or acquisitions.
HOW WE EVALUATE OUR OPERATIONS
     Our management uses a variety of financial and operational measurements to analyze our performance. We view these measures as important tools for evaluating the success of our operations and review these measurements on a monthly basis for consistency and trend analysis. These measures include volumes, segment margin and operating and maintenance expenses on a segment basis and EBITDA on a company-wide basis.
     Volumes. We must continually obtain new supplies of natural gas to maintain or increase throughput volumes on our gathering and processing systems. Our ability to maintain existing supplies of natural gas and obtain new supplies is affected by (1) the level of workovers or recompletions of existing connected wells and successful drilling activity in areas currently dedicated to our pipelines, (2) our ability to compete for volumes from successful new wells in other areas and (3) our ability to obtain natural gas that has been released from other commitments. We routinely monitor producer activity in the areas served by our gathering and processing systems to pursue new supply opportunities.
     To increase throughput volumes on our intrastate pipeline we must contract with shippers, including producers and marketers, for supplies of natural gas. We routinely monitor producer and marketing activities in the areas served by our transportation system in search of new supply opportunities.
     Segment Margin. We calculate our Gathering and Processing segment margin as our revenue generated from our gathering and processing operations minus the cost of natural gas and NGLs purchased and other cost of sales, including third-party transportation and processing fees. Revenue includes revenue from the sale of natural gas and NGLs resulting from these activities and fixed fees associated with the gathering and processing of natural gas.
     We calculate our Transportation segment margin as revenue generated by fee income as well as, in those instances in which we purchase and sell gas for our account, gas sales revenue minus the cost of natural gas that we purchase and transport. Revenue primarily includes fees for the transportation of pipeline-quality natural gas and the margin generated by sales of natural gas transported for our account. Most of our segment margin is fee-based with little or no commodity price risk. We generally purchase pipeline-quality natural gas at a pipeline inlet price adjusted to reflect our transportation fee and we sell that gas at the pipeline outlet. We regard the difference between the purchase price and the sale price as the economic equivalent of our transportation fee.
     Total Segment Margin. Segment margin from Gathering and Processing, together with segment margin from Transportation, comprise total segment margin. We use total segment margin as a measure of performance. The following table reconciles the non-GAAP financial measure, total segment margin, to its most directly comparable GAAP measure, net income (loss).

 


Table of Contents

                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    June 30, 2007     June 30, 2006     June 30, 2007     June 30, 2006  
    (in thousands)  
Net income (loss)
  $ (7,577 )   $ 3,760     $ (8,872 )   $ (2,559 )
Add (deduct):
                               
Operation and maintenance
    11,008       8,382       21,932       17,827  
General and administrative
    19,293       6,923       26,144       12,339  
Management services termination fee
                      9,000  
Loss on sale of assets
    532             2,340        
Depreciation and amortization
    12,507       9,378       23,934       18,547  
Interest expense, net
    15,961       8,389       30,846       16,390  
Other income and deductions, net
    (173 )     (201 )     (283 )     (383 )
Income tax expense
    225             225        
 
                       
Total segment margin
  $ 51,776     $ 36,631     $ 96,266     $ 71,161  
 
                       
     Operation and Maintenance. Operation and maintenance expenses are a separate measure that we use to evaluate operating performance of field operations. Direct labor, insurance, property taxes, repair and maintenance, utilities and contract services comprise the most significant portion of our operating and maintenance expenses. These expenses are largely independent of the volumes through our systems but fluctuate depending on the activities performed during a specific period. We do not deduct operation and maintenance from total revenues in calculating segment margin because we separately evaluate commodity volume and price changes in segment margin.
     EBITDA. We define EBITDA as net income plus interest expense, provision for income taxes and depreciation and amortization expense. EBITDA is used as a supplemental measure by our management and by external users of our financial statements such as investors, commercial banks, research analysts and others, to assess:
  §   financial performance of our assets without regard to financing methods, capital structure or historical cost basis;
 
  §   the ability of our assets to generate cash sufficient to pay interest costs, support our indebtedness and make cash distributions to our unitholders and general partners;
 
  §   our operating performance and return on capital as compared to those of other companies in the midstream energy sector, without regard to financing or capital structure; and
 
  §   the viability of acquisitions and capital expenditure projects and the overall rates of return on alternative investment opportunities.
     EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income, operating income, cash flows from operating activities or any other measure of financial performance presented in accordance with GAAP. EBITDA is the starting point in determining cash available for distribution, which is an important non-GAAP financial measure for a publicly traded master limited partnership. The following table reconciles the non-GAAP financial measure, EBITDA, to its most directly comparable GAAP measure, net loss and net cash flows provided by operating activities.

 


Table of Contents

                 
    Six Months Ended  
    June 30, 2007     June 30, 2006  
    (in thousands)  
Net cash flows provided by operating activities
  $ 36,039     $ 24,728  
Add (deduct):
               
Depreciation and amortization
    (24,626 )     (18,975 )
Equity income
    43       220  
Risk management portfolio valuation changes
    591       811  
Loss on sale of assets
    (2,340 )      
Unit based compensation expenses
    (14,085 )     (1,089 )
Changes in current assets and liabilities:
               
Accrued revenues and accounts receivable
    20,878       (13,770 )
Other current assets
    (358 )     (109 )
Accounts payable, accrued cost of gas and liquids and accrued liabilities
    (25,594 )     11,743  
Accrued taxes payable
    (1,682 )     (921 )
Interest payable
    (19 )      
Other current liabilities
    1,783       735  
Proceeds from early termination of interest rate swap
          (3,550 )
Other assets
    498       (2,382 )
 
           
Net loss
  $ (8,872 )   $ (2,559 )
Add:
               
Interest expense, net
    30,846       16,390  
Depreciation and amortization
    23,934       18,547  
Income tax expense
    225        
 
           
EBITDA
  $ 46,133     $ 32,378  
 
           
CASH DISTRIBUTIONS
     On May 15, 2007, the Partnership paid a distribution of $0.38 per common and subordinated unit for the three months ended March 31, 2007. On July 27, 2007, the Partnership declared a distribution of $0.38 per common and subordinated unit for the three months ended June 30, 2007, payable on August 14, 2007 to unitholders of record at the close of business on August 7, 2007.

 


Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 vs. Three Months Ended June 30, 2006
     The following table contains key company-wide performance indicators related to our discussion of the results of operations.
                                 
    Three Months Ended              
    June 30, 2007     June 30, 2006     Change     Percent  
    (in thousands except percentages and volume data)          
Revenues
  $ 301,536     $ 214,658     $ 86,878       40 %
Cost of gas and liquids
    249,760       178,027       71,733       40  
 
                         
Total segment margin (1)
    51,776       36,631       15,145       41  
 
                               
Operation and maintenance
    11,008       8,382       2,626       31  
General and administrative
    19,293       6,923       12,370       179  
Loss on the sale of assets
    532             532       n/m  
Depreciation and amortization
    12,507       9,378       3,129       33  
 
                         
Operating income
    8,436       11,948       (3,512 )     (29 )
 
                               
Interest expense, net
    (15,961 )     (8,389 )     (7,572 )     90  
Other income and deductions, net
    173       201       (28 )     (14 )
 
                         
 
                               
Income (loss) before income taxes
    (7,352 )     3,760       (11,112 )     (296 )
 
                               
Income tax expense
    225             225       n/m  
 
                         
 
                               
Net income (loss)
  $ (7,577 )   $ 3,760     $ (11,337 )     (302 )%
 
                         
 
                               
System inlet volumes (MMbtu/d) (2)
    1,218,822       980,444       238,378       24  
 
(1)   For reconciliation of total segment margin to its most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, please read “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – How We Evaluate Our Operations.”
 
(2)   System inlet volumes include total volumes taken into both our gathering and processing system and our transportation systems.
 
n/m – not meaningful.

 


Table of Contents

     The table below contains key segment performance indicators related to our discussion of the results of operations.
                                 
    Three Months Ended        
    June 30, 2007   June 30, 2006   Change   Percent
    (in thousands except volume data)        
Segment Financial and Operating Data:
                               
Gathering and Processing Segment
                               
Financial data:
                               
Segment margin
  $ 38,407     $ 25,914     $ 12,493       48 %
Operation and maintenance
    9,519       7,280       2,239       31  
Operating data:
                               
Throughput (MMbtu/d)
    756,092       496,238       259,854       52  
NGL gross production (Bbls/d)
    20,967       16,972       3,995       24  
 
                               
Transportation Segment
                               
Financial data:
                               
Segment margin
  $ 13,369     $ 10,717     $ 2,652       25  
Operation and maintenance
    1,489       1,102       387       35  
Operating data:
                               
Throughput (MMbtu/d)
    777,927       577,217       200,710       35  
     Net Income (Loss). Net loss of $7,577,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to net income of $3,760,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2006, an $11,337,000 decline. An increase in total segment margin of $15,145,000 was primarily due to organic growth in the gathering and processing segment offset by:
  §   an increase in general and administrative expense of $12,370,000 primarily due to a one-time charge of $11,928,000 related to our long-term incentive plan associated with the vesting of all outstanding common unit options and restricted common units on June 18, 2007 resulting from the change in control effected by the GE EFS Acquisition;
 
  §   an increase of $7,572,000 in interest expense, net primarily due to increased levels of borrowings used primarily to finance our Pueblo Acquisition and growth capital projects;
 
  §   an increase in operation and maintenance expense of $2,626,000 primarily due to organic growth in the gathering and processing segment; and
 
  §   an increase in depreciation and amortization of $3,129,000 primarily due to higher levels of depreciation from projects completed since June 30, 2006.
     Segment Margin. Total segment margin for the three months ended June 30, 2007 increased $15,145,000 compared with the three months ended June 30, 2006. This increase was attributable to an increase of $12,493,000 in gathering and processing segment margin and an increase of $2,652,000 in transportation segment margin as discussed below.
     Gathering and processing segment margin increased to $38,407,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2007 from $25,914,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2006. The major components of this increase were as follows:
  §   $3,558,000 attributable to the operations of the Elm Grove and Dubberly refrigeration plants in North Louisiana, which began operations in May 2006 and December 2006, respectively;
 
  §   $3,362,000 associated with organic growth in east and south Texas;
 
  §   $2,463,000 primarily attributable to other than described above increased throughput volumes in north Louisiana;
 
  §   $2,271,000 attributable to volumes associated with our Como plant acquisition in July 2006; and
 
  §   $1,364,000 attributable to the operation of the LaSalle County Phase II organic growth project in south Texas, which began operations in December 2006.
     Transportation segment margin increased to $13,369,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2007 from $10,717,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2006. The major components of this increase were as follows:
  §   $1,577,000 attributable to increased margins associated with our merchant marketing activities; and
 
  §   $1,075,000 associated with increased throughput volumes, partially offset by reduced margin per unit.

 


Table of Contents

     Operation and Maintenance. Operations and maintenance expense increased to $11,008,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2007 from $8,382,000 for the corresponding period in 2006, a 31 percent increase. This increase is primarily the result of the following factors:
  §   $940,000 of increased employee related expenses primarily in the gathering and processing segment resulting from the employment of additional employees as a result of organic growth and employee annual pay raises;
 
  §   $633,000 of increased consumable expenses primarily in the gathering and processing segment resulting primarily from additional compression;
 
  §   $479,000 of increased materials and parts expense primarily in the gathering and processing segment resulting mostly from materials and parts used at our processing plants and for additional compression;
 
  §   $345,000 increase in contractor expenses primarily in the gathering and processing segment mostly related to contractor expense at Pueblo; and
 
  §   $282,000 of increased property taxes associated with our transportation system in north Louisiana.
     General and Administrative. General and administrative expense increased to $19,293,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2007 from $6,923,000 for the same period in 2006, a 179 percent increase. The increase is primarily due to:
  §   a one-time charge of $11,928,000 related to our long-term incentive plan associated with the vesting of all outstanding common unit options and restricted common units on June 18, 2007 resulting from the change in control effected by the GE EFS Acquisition;
 
  §   $719,000 of increased employee related expenses primarily resulting from annual pay raises and hiring new employees to assist us in achieving our strategic objectives; and
 
  §   $534,000 of increased expenses associated with our long-term incentive plan that primarily relates to the issuance of restricted units since July 1, 2006, exclusive of the one-time charge discussed above.
     These factors were partially offset by the absence in 2007 of acquisition expenses related to our TexStar acquisition of $684,000 and TexStar management fees of $135,000. The acquisition costs were expensed because we accounted for the TexStar acquisition in a manner similar to a pooling of interests as the entities involved in the transaction were entities under common control.
     Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased to $12,507,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2007 from $9,378,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2006, a 33 percent increase. The increase is due to higher depreciation expense of $2,611,000 primarily from organic growth projects completed since June 30, 2006 and to a lesser extent depreciation expense from our Pueblo Acquisition in April 2007. Also contributing to the increase was higher identifiable intangible asset amortization of $518,000 primarily related to contracts acquired in July 2006.
     Interest Expense, Net. Interest expense, net increased $7,572,000, or 90 percent, in the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006. Of this increase, $6,528,000 was attributable to increased levels of borrowings and $1,470,000 was attributable to higher interest rates partially offset by amortization from interest rate swap termination proceeds from accumulated other comprehensive income. The unamortized balance of interest rate swap termination proceeds in accumulated other comprehensive income at June 30, 2007 was $777,000.

 


Table of Contents

Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 vs. Six Months Ended June 30, 2006
     The following table contains key company-wide performance indicators related to our discussion of the results of operations.
                                 
    Six Months Ended              
    June 30, 2007     June 30, 2006     Change     Percent  
    (in thousands except percentages and volume data)          
Revenues
  $ 557,964     $ 445,924     $ 112,040       25 %
Cost of gas and liquids
    461,698       374,763       86,935       23  
 
                         
Total segment margin (1)
    96,266       71,161       25,105       35  
 
                               
Operation and maintenance
    21,932       17,827       4,105       23  
General and administrative
    26,144       12,339       13,805       112  
Loss on sale of assets
    2,340             2,340       n/m  
Management services termination fee
          9,000       (9,000 )     n/m  
Depreciation and amortization
    23,934       18,547       5,387       29  
 
                         
Operating income
    21,916       13,448       8,468       63  
 
                               
Interest expense, net
    (30,846 )     (16,390 )     (14,456 )     88  
Other income and deductions, net
    283       383       (100 )     (26 )
 
                         
 
                               
Income (loss) before income taxes
    (8,647 )     (2,559 )     (6,088 )     238  
 
                               
Income tax expense
    225             225       n/m  
 
                         
 
                               
Net loss
  $ (8,872 )   $ (2,559 )   $ (6,313 )     247 %
 
                         
 
                               
System inlet volumes (MMbtu/d) (2)
    1,176,568       916,218       260,350       28  
 
(1)   For reconciliation of total segment margin to its most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, please read “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – How We Evaluate Our Operations.”
 
(2)   System inlet volumes include total volumes taken into both our gathering and processing system and our transportation systems.
 
n/m – not meaningful.
     The table below contains key segment performance indicators related to our discussion of the results of operations.
                                 
    Six Months Ended        
    June 30, 2007   June 30, 2006   Change   Percent
    (in thousands except volume data)        
Segment Financial and Operating Data:
                               
Gathering and Processing Segment
                               
Financial data:
                               
Segment margin
  $ 68,584     $ 50,556     $ 18,028       36 %
Operation and maintenance
    18,633       15,578       3,055       20  
Operating data:
                               
Throughput (MMbtu/d)
    742,729       460,116       282,613       61  
NGL gross production (Bbls/d)
    20,510       17,224       3,286       19  
 
                               
Transportation Segment
                               
Financial data:
                               
Segment margin
  $ 27,682     $ 20,605     $ 7,077       34  
Operation and maintenance
    3,299       2,249       1,050       47  
Operating data:
                               
Throughput (MMbtu/d)
    741,395       508,190       233,205       46  

 


Table of Contents

     Net Loss. Net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2007 increased $6,313,000 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2006. An increase in total segment margin of $25,105,000 was primarily due to organic growth in the gathering and processing segment offset by:
  §   an increase in interest expense, net of $14,456,000 primarily due to increased levels of borrowings used primarily to finance our Pueblo Acquisition and growth capital projects;
 
  §   an increase in general and administrative expense of $13,805,000 primarily due to a one-time charge of $11,928,000 related to our long-term incentive plan associated with the vesting of all outstanding common unit options and restricted common units on June 18, 2007 resulting from the change in control effected by the GE EFS Acquisition and higher employee related expenses;
 
  §   an increase in depreciation and amortization of $5,387,000 primarily due to higher levels of depreciation from organic growth projects completed since June 30, 2006;
 
  §   an increase in operation and maintenance expense of $4,105,000 primarily due to increased employee related expenses, increased consumables expenses, an expense equal to our estimated thirty day insurance deductible relating to an unplanned outage in the transportation segment, higher property taxes in both our business segments; and
 
  §   a loss on the sale of certain non-core assets of $2,340,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2007 and a one-time charge of $9,000,000 for the termination of two long-term management services contracts in connection with our IPO recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2006.
     Segment Margin. Total segment margin for the six months ended June 30, 2007 increased $25,105,000 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2006. This increase was attributable to an increase of $18,028,000 in gathering and processing segment margin and an increase of $7,077,000 in transportation segment margin as discussed below.
     Gathering and processing segment margin increased to $68,584,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $50,556,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The major components of this increase were as follows:
  §   $6,138,000 attributable to the operations of the Elm Grove and Dubberly refrigeration plants in North Louisiana, which began operations in May 2006 and December 2006, respectively;
 
  §   $5,301,000 primarily attributable to other than described above organic growth in north Louisiana;
 
  §   $4,416,000 attributable to volumes associated with our Como plant acquisition in July 2006;
 
  §   $2,836,000 attributable to the operation of the LaSalle County Phase II organic growth project in South Texas, which began operations in December 2006;
 
  §   $2,381,000 primarily attributable to other than described above organic growth in east and south Texas; and partially offset by
 
  §   $1,238,000 attributable to year over year losses from risk management activities.
     Transportation segment margin increased to $27,682,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $20,605,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The major components of this increase were as follows:
  §   $8,615,000 attributable to an increase in throughput volumes, partially offset by reduced margin per unit of $2,047,000 and
 
  §   $460,000 of increased margins from our merchant marketing activities.
     Operation and Maintenance. Operations and maintenance expense increased to $21,932,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $17,827,000 for the corresponding period in 2006, a 23 percent increase. This increase is the result of the following factors:
  §   $1,364,000 of increased employee related expenses primarily in the gathering and processing segment resulting from the employment of additional employees as a result of organic growth and employee annual pay raises;
 
  §   $908,000 of increased consumable expenses primarily in the gathering and processing segment primarily resulting from additional compression;
 
  §   $627,000 of unplanned outage expense in the transportation segment in 2007 related to the Eastside compressor fire, which represents our estimated thirty day deductible;
 
  §   $466,000 of increased higher property taxes associated with our transportation system in north Louisiana;
 
  §   $419,000 of increased materials and parts expense primarily in the gathering and processing segment resulting mostly from materials and parts used at our processing plants and for additional compression; and
 
  §   $418,000 of increased utility expense primarily in the gathering and processing segment resulting from two of our north Louisiana refrigeration plants, one placed in service in May 2006 and the other in December 2006.

 


Table of Contents

     General and Administrative. General and administrative expense increased to $26,144,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $12,339,000 for the same period in 2006, a 112 percent increase. The increase is primarily due to:
  §   a one-time charge of $11,928,000 related to our long-term incentive plan associated with the vesting of all outstanding common unit options and restricted common units on June 18, 2007 resulting from the change in control effected by the GE EFS Acquisition;
 
  §   $1,214,000 of increased employee related expenses resulting from pay raises and the employment of additional employees; and
 
  §   $1,323,000 of increased expenses associated with our long-term incentive plan that primarily relates to the issuance of restricted units, exclusive of the one-time charge discussed above.
     Partially offsetting these increases in general and administrative expenses was the absence in 2007 of acquisition expenses related to our TexStar acquisition of $684,000.
     Other. In the six months ended June 30, 2006, we recorded a one-time charge of $9,000,000 for the termination of two long-term management services contracts in connection with our IPO. In the six months ended June 30, 2007, we sold selected non-core pipelines, related rights of way and contracts located in the gathering and processing segment for $10,396,000 in cash and recorded a related charge of $2,340,000.
     Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased to $23,934,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $18,547,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006, a 29 percent increase. The increase is due to higher depreciation expense of $4,336,000 primarily from organic growth projects completed since June 30, 2006 and to a lesser extent our April 2007 Pueblo Acquisition. Also contributing to the increase was higher identifiable intangible asset amortization of $1,051,000 primarily related to contracts acquired in July 2006.
     Interest Expense, Net. Interest expense, net increased $14,456,000, or 88 percent, in the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006. Of this increase, $11,848,000 was attributable to increased levels of borrowings and $3,225,000 was attributable to higher interest rates partially offset by amortization from interest rate swap termination proceeds from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The unamortized balance of interest rate swap termination proceeds in accumulated other comprehensive income at June 30, 2007 was $777,000.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
     Information regarding the Partnership’s critical accounting policies and estimates is included in Item 7 of the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
OTHER MATTERS
     Legal. Blackbrush Oil & Gas LLC (“BBOG”), owned by an affiliate of HM Capital that was the seller in our acquisition of TexStar Field Services, L.P., and certain of its subsidiaries are defendants in a wrongful death action styled Takas v. Strait Energy Services LLC et al. brought in state district court in Jim Wells County, Texas. The claim for both actual and punitive damages is made on behalf of the wife of the driver of a tractor trailer truck who was killed when the truck was struck by a train at a railway crossing. The truck was owned by a subcontractor working on, and was enroute to, a construction site relating to a pipeline owned by an entity that was then a subsidiary of TexStar. This accident occurred on July 15, 2005, prior to our acquisition of TexStar on August 15, 2006. One of our subsidiaries (Regency Frio NewLine LP), has now been named as a defendant in the litigation. We have retained counsel to file responses, and notified our insurance carrier regarding this matter. We do not expect it to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or our results of operations.
     The Partnership is involved in various claims and lawsuits incidental to its business. In the opinion of management, these claims and lawsuits in the aggregate will not have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
     Escrow Payable. At June 30, 2007, $5,912,000 remained in escrow pending the completion by El Paso Field Services, LP (“El Paso”) of environmental remediation projects pursuant to the purchase and sale agreement (“El Paso PSA”) related to the assets in north Louisiana

 


Table of Contents

and in the mid-continent area. In the El Paso PSA, El Paso indemnified the predecessor of our operating partnership, RGS, against losses arising from pre-closing and known environmental liabilities subject to a limit of $84,000,000 and subject to certain deductible limits. Upon completion of a Phase II environmental study, we notified El Paso of remediation obligations amounting to $1,800,000 with respect to known environmental matters and $3,600,000 with respect to pre-closing environmental liabilities. Upon satisfactory completion of the remediation by El Paso, the amount held in escrow will be released.
     Environmental. A Phase I environmental study was performed on the Waha assets in connection with the pre-acquisition due diligence process in 2004. Most of the identified environmental contamination had either been remediated or was being remediated by the previous owners or operators of the properties. The estimated potential environmental remediation costs at specific locations range from $1,900,000 to $3,100,000. No governmental agency has required the Partnership to undertake these remediation efforts. Management believes that the likelihood that it will be liable for any significant potential remediation liabilities identified in the study is remote. Separately, the Partnership acquired an environmental pollution liability insurance policy in connection with the acquisition to cover any undetected or unknown pollution discovered in the future. The policy covers clean-up costs and damages to third parties, and has a 10-year term (expiring 2014) with a $10,000,000 limit subject to certain deductibles.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
     We expect our sources of liquidity to include:
  §   cash generated from operations;
 
  §   borrowings under our credit facility;
 
  §   debt offerings; and
 
  §   issuance of additional partnership units.
     We believe that the cash generated from these sources will be sufficient to meet our minimum quarterly cash distributions and our requirements for short-term working capital and growth capital expenditures for the next twelve months.
     As described above under “— Equity Offering,” we sold to the public an aggregate of 11,500,000 common units in late July 2007 from which sale we received net proceeds of $353,832,000, exclusive of related proportional capital contributions by our general partner of $7,221,000.
     The Partnership used a portion of these proceeds to repay amounts outstanding under the term ($50,000,000) and revolving credit facility ($178,930,000). In addition, we will redeem, after completion of the notice period, $192,500,000 in principal amount of our outstanding senior notes, which will require us to pay an early redemption penalty of $16,122,000. Until the repurchase of the senior notes is complete, we may use the remaining net proceeds of $130,623,000 to fund working capital needs, growth capital projects or acquisitions.
     We believe our relationship with GE EFS increases our access to capital and enables us to pursue strategic opportunities that we may otherwise not be able to pursue. In addition, we believe we have sufficient liquidity under our credit facility to fund our near term growth capital requirements.
     Working Capital Surplus (Deficit). Working capital is the amount by which current assets exceed current liabilities and is a measure of our ability to pay our liabilities as they become due. During periods of growth capital expenditures, we experience working capital deficits when we fund construction expenditures out of working capital until they are permanently financed. Our working capital is also affected by changes in fair market value of our derivative positions to the extent reflected on our balance sheet. These represent our expectations for the settlement of risk management rights and obligations over the next twelve months, and so must be viewed differently from trade accounts receivable and accounts payable that settle over a much shorter span of time.

 


Table of Contents

When our derivative positions are settled, we expect an offsetting physical transaction, and, as a result, we do not expect risk management assets and liabilities to affect our ability to pay bills as they come due.
     Our working capital surplus was $2,741,000 at June 30, 2007 compared to a working capital deficit of $15,240,000 at December 31, 2006. The increase in working capital of $17,981,000 is primarily due to:
  §   an increase in cash and cash equivalents of $21,932,000 due to certain producer payments made after June 30, 2007;
 
  §   a net increase in accrued revenues and accounts receivable and accounts payable, accrued cost of gas and liquids and accrued liabilities of $10,131,000 due the timing of receipts and payments; partially offset by
 
  §   a net increase of $10,460,000 in liabilities from risk management activities primarily due to an increase in the commodity prices we expect to pay (index prices) on our outstanding swaps as compared to the commodity prices we will receive upon settlement of our swaps; and
 
  §   an increase in accrued taxes payable of $1,682,000 primarily due to anticipated increased levels of property tax in the transportation segment.
     Cash Flows from Operations. Net cash flows provided by operating activities increased $11,311,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006. Cash generated from operations increased primarily due to increased segment margin.
     Cash Flows from Investing Activities. Net cash flows used in investing activities increased $54,449,000, or 89 percent, in the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006. The increase is primarily due to our Pueblo Acquisition ($54,952,000) in April 2007 and higher growth and maintenance capital expenditures discussed in “Capital Requirements.” Partially offsetting the increase in cash flows used in investing activities were $10,396,000 in proceeds from the sale of certain non-strategic assets.
     Cash Flows from Financing Activities. Net cash flows provided by financing activities increased $62,233,000, or 159 percent, in the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006 primarily due to (1) an increase in borrowings under our credit facility of $74,830,000 used primarily for our Pueblo Acquisition and growth capital projects; (2) a decrease of $9,000,000 related to IPO proceeds received in 2006 not received in 2007, which was subsequently used to terminate two management services contracts with an affiliate of HM Capital as a cash outflow from operations; and (3) an increase in partner distributions of $24,374,000 reflecting both an increase over the minimum quarterly distribution and the limited distributions made in the period following our IPO.
Capital Requirements
     We categorize our capital expenditures as either:
  §   Growth capital expenditures, which are made to acquire additional assets to increase our business, to expand and upgrade existing systems and facilities or to construct or acquire similar systems or facilities; or
 
  §   Maintenance capital expenditures, which are made to replace partially or fully depreciated assets, to maintain the existing operating capacity of our assets and to extend their useful lives or to maintain existing system volumes and related cash flows.
     Growth Capital Expenditures. In the six months ended June 30, 2007, we incurred $55,609,000 of growth capital expenditures. Growth capital expenditures primarily relate to growth capital projects listed below and our acquisition of the outstanding interest in the Palafox Joint Venture that we did not own (50 percent) for $5,000,000 in February 2007.
     Our 2007 growth budget includes approximately $88,000,000 of currently identified organic growth capital expenditures. These growth capital expenditures are for more than 30 projects, of which the most significant are the following:
  §   $16,200,000 for constructing a 40 mile, 10 inch diameter pipeline in our gathering and processing segment;
 
  §   $12,000,000 for constructing 20 miles of 10 inch diameter pipeline, which will connect the Fashing Processing Plant to our Tilden Processing Plant in south Texas and reconfiguring our Tilden Processing Plant;
 
  §   $9,400,000 to re-build and activate an existing nitrogen rejection unit at our Eustace Processing Plant;

 


Table of Contents

  §   $8,100,000 for constructing 31 miles of 12 inch diameter pipeline in south Texas; and
 
  §   $7,000,000 for the electrification and adding an acid gas injection well at our Tilden Processing Plant.
     Maintenance Capital Expenditures. In the six months ended June 30, 2007, we incurred $3,236,000 of maintenance capital expenditures. Maintenance capital expenditures primarily consist of compressor and equipment overhauls, as well as new well connects to our gathering systems, which replace volumes from naturally occurring depletion of wells already connected.
     Contractual Obligations. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, we borrowed $80,830,000 and $114,230,000 under our revolving credit facility primarily for our Pueblo Acquisition and growth capital expenditures. During the three months ended June 30, 2007, we qualified for capital lease accounting on a NGL pipeline in east Texas with an obligation of $3,000,000, which we are amortizing over twenty years. During the three months ended June 30, 2007 we established a new purchase contractual obligation of $2,400,000 for a pipeline project in south Texas, which will be paid during the second half of 2007.

 


Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
     We are a net seller of NGLs, and as such our financial results are exposed to fluctuations in NGLs pricing. We have executed swap contracts settled against crude oil, ethane, propane, butane and natural gasoline market prices, supplemented with crude oil put options. We have hedged our expected exposure to declines in prices for NGLs, condensate and natural gas volumes produced for our account in the approximate percentages set forth below:
                         
    2007   2008   2009
NGL
    78 %     74 %     29 %
Condensate
    74 %     74 %     74 %
Natural Gas
    67 %     0 %     0 %
     We continually monitor our hedging and contract portfolio and expect to continue to adjust our hedge position as conditions warrant.
     The following table sets forth certain information regarding our NGL swaps outstanding at June 30, 2007. The relevant index price that we pay is the monthly average of the daily closing price for deliveries of commodities into Mont Belvieu, Texas as reported by the Oil Price Information Service (OPIS).
                                         
                    We               Fair Value  
Period   Commodity   Notional Volume   Pay   We Receive   (in thousands)  
July 2007 – December 2008
  Ethane     1,116     (MBbls)   Index   $ 0.55-$0.673     ($/gallon)   $ 4,056  
July 2007 – December 2009
  Propane     1,058     (MBbls)   Index   $ 0.825-$1.10     ($/gallon)     5,912  
July 2007 – December 2009
  Butane     684     (MBbls)   Index   $ 1.025-$1.27     ($/gallon)     3,728  
July 2007 – December 2009
  Natural Gasoline     387     (MBbls)   Index   $ 1.22-$1.59     ($/gallon)     2,201  
July 2007 – December 2009
  West Texas Intermediate Crude     595     (MBbls)   Index   $ 65.60-$68.38     ($/Bbl)     2,447  
July 2007 – December 2007
  NYMEX Natural Gas     5,000     (MMBtu/d)   Index   $ 7.91     ($/MMBtu)     (381 )
 
                                     
Total Fair Value
                                  $ 17,963  
 
                                     
Interest Rate Risk
     As of June 30, 2007, we had $228,930,000 of outstanding long-term balances exposed to variable interest rate risk. An increase of 100 basis points in the LIBOR rate would increase our annual payment by $2,229,000.

 


Table of Contents

Item 4. Controls and Procedures
     Disclosure controls. At the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of our managing general partner, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such terms are defined in Rule 13a–15(e) and 15d–15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of our managing general partner, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2007 to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is properly recorded, processed summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
     Internal control over financial reporting. In anticipation of becoming subject to the provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we initiated in early 2005 a program of documentation, implementation and testing of internal control over financial reporting. This program will continue through this year, culminating with our initial Section 404 certification and attestation in early 2008.
     To the extent that we discover any matter in the design or operation of our system of internal control over financial reporting that might be considered to be a significant deficiency or a material weakness, whether or not considered reasonably likely to affect adversely our ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information properly, we report that matter to our independent registered public accounting firm and to the audit committee of our board of directors.
     There have been no other changes in the Partnership’s internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect, the Partnership’s internal controls over financial reporting.

 


Table of Contents

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
     The information required for this item is provided in Note 6, Commitments and Contingencies, included in the notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included under Part I, Item 1, which information is incorporated by reference into this item.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
     In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 and in Park II, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Quarterly Report on From 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are not the only risks facing our Partnership.
     We may not have sufficient cash from operations to enable us to pay our current quarterly distribution following the establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees and expenses, including reimbursement of fees and expenses of our general partner.
     We may not have sufficient available cash from operating surplus each quarter to pay our current quarterly distribution. The amount of cash we can distribute on our units depends principally on the amount of cash we generate from our operations, which will fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on, among other things:
  §   the fees we charge and the margins we realize for our services and sales;
 
  §   the prices of, level of production of, and demand for natural gas and NGLs
 
  §   the volumes of natural gas we gather, process and transport;
 
  §   the level of our operating costs, including reimbursement of fees and expenses of our general partner; and
 
  §   prevailing economic conditions.
     In addition, the actual amount of cash we will have available for distribution will depend on other factors, some of which are beyond our control, including:
  §   our debt service requirements;
 
  §   fluctuations in our working capital needs;
 
  §   our ability to borrow funds and access capital markets;
 
  §   restrictions contained in our debt agreements;
 
  §   the level of capital expenditures we make;
 
  §   the cost of acquisitions, if any; and
 
  §   the amount of cash reserves established by our general partner.
     You should be aware that the amount of cash we have available for distribution depends primarily upon our cash flow and not solely on profitability, which will be affected by non-cash items. As a result, we may make cash distributions during periods when we record losses for financial accounting purposes and may not make cash distributions during periods when we record net earnings for financial accounting purposes.

 


Table of Contents

     We may incur significant costs and liabilities as a result of pipeline integrity management program testing and any related pipeline repair, or preventative or remedial measures.
     The United States Department of Transportation, or DOT, has adopted regulations requiring pipeline operators to develop integrity management programs for transportation pipelines located where a leak or rupture could do the most harm in “high consequence areas.” The regulations require operators to:
  §   perform ongoing assessments of pipeline integrity;
 
  §   identify and characterize applicable threats to pipeline segments that could impact a high consequence area;
 
  §   improve data collection, integration and analysis;
 
  §   repair and remediate the pipeline as necessary; and
 
  §   implement preventive and mitigating actions.
     We currently estimate that we will incur costs of approximately $2,000,000 between 2007 and 2010 to implement pipeline integrity management program testing along certain segments of our pipeline, as required by existing DOT regulations. This estimate does not include the costs, if any, for repair, remediation, preventative or mitigating actions that may be determined to be necessary as a result of the testing program, which could be substantial.
     Restrictions in our credit agreement could limit our ability to make distributions upon the occurrence of certain events.
     Our payment of principal and interest on our debt will reduce cash available for distributions on our common units. Our credit agreement limits our ability to make distributions upon the occurrence of the following events, among others:
  §   failure to pay any principal, interest, fees or other amounts when due;
 
  §   any representation or warranty proves to be false or misleading in any material respect;
 
  §   failure to perform or otherwise comply with the covenants in the credit agreement or any loan document;
 
  §   failure to pay any other material debt or failure to perform or otherwise to comply with the covenants of the agreements governing any material debt;
 
  §   a bankruptcy or insolvency event involving us, our general partner or any of our subsidiaries;
 
  §   the entry of, and failure to pay, one or more adverse judgments in excess of a specified amount against which enforcement proceedings are brought or that are not stayed pending appeal;
 
  §   a change in control of us (waived by our lenders in the case of the GE EFS Acquisition);
 
  §   the occurrence of certain events with respect to employee benefit plans subject to ERISA;
 
  §   any security interest or lien in excess of a specified amount is no longer valid or in effect; and
 
  §   any loan document is declared null and void or a proceeding is initiated to challenge the validity or enforceability of the loan document.
     Any subsequent refinancing of our current debt or any new debt could have similar or more restrictive provisions. For more information regarding our credit agreement, please read “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Capital Requirements — Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K incorporated by reference herein.
Risks Related to Our Structure
     GE EFS owns 29.8 percent as of August 7, 2007 of the limited partner units outstanding and controls our general partner, which has sole responsibility for conducting our business and managing our operations.
     GE EFS owns 29.8 percent as of August 7, 2007 of the limited partner units outstanding and controls our General Partner. Although our General Partner has a fiduciary duty to manage us in a manner beneficial to us and our unitholders, the directors and officers of our General Partner have a fiduciary duty to manage our General Partner in a manner beneficial to its owner, GE EFS. Conflicts of interest may arise between GE EFS and its affiliates, including our General Partner, on the one hand, and us, on the other hand. In resolving these conflicts of interest, our General Partner may favor its own interests and the interests of its affiliates over our interests. These conflicts include, among others, the following situations:
  §   neither our partnership agreement nor any other agreement requires GE EFS or its affiliates to pursue a business strategy that favors us;
 
  §   our General Partner is allowed to take into account the interests of parties other than us, such as GE EFS, in resolving conflicts of interest;

 


Table of Contents

  §   our General Partner determines the amount and timing of asset purchases and sales, capital expenditures, borrowings and repayments of debt, issuance of additional partnership securities, and cash reserves, each of which can affect the amount of cash available for distribution;
 
  §   our General Partner determines which costs incurred by it and its affiliates are reimbursable by us;
 
  §   our partnership agreement does not restrict our General Partner from causing us to pay it or its affiliates for any services rendered to us or entering into additional contractual arrangements with any of these entities on our behalf;
 
  §   our General Partner intends to limit its liability regarding our contractual and other obligations; and
 
  §   our General Partner controls the enforcement of obligations owed to us by our General Partner and its affiliates.
     GE EFS and its affiliates may compete directly with us.
     GE EFS and its affiliates are not prohibited from owning assets or engaging in businesses that compete directly or independently with us. GE EFS and its affiliates currently own various midstream assets and conduct midstream business that may potentially compete with us. In addition, GE EFS or its affiliates may acquire, construct or dispose of any additional midstream or other assets in the future, without any obligation to offer us the opportunity to purchase or construct or dispose of those assets.
     Our partnership agreement limits our General Partner’s fiduciary duties to our unitholders and restricts the remedies available to unitholders for actions taken by our General Partner that might otherwise constitute breaches of fiduciary duty.
     Our partnership agreement contains provisions that reduce the standards to which our General Partner would otherwise be held by state fiduciary duty law. For example, our partnership agreement:
  §   permits our General Partner to make a number of decisions in its individual capacity, as opposed to its capacity as our General Partner. This entitles our General Partner to consider only the interests and factors that it desires, and it has no duty or obligation to give any consideration to any interest of, or factors affecting, us, our affiliates or any limited partner. Examples include the exercise of its limited call right, its voting rights with respect to the units it owns, its registration rights and its determination whether or not to consent to any merger or consolidation of the partnership;
 
  §   provides that our General Partner will not have any liability to us or our unitholders for decisions made in its capacity as a General Partner so long as it acted in good faith, meaning it believed the decision was in the best interests of our partnership;
 
  §   provides that our General Partner is entitled to make other decisions in “good faith” if it believes that the decision is in our best interests;
 
  §   provides generally that affiliated transactions and resolutions of conflicts of interest not approved by the conflicts committee of our General Partner and not involving a vote of unitholders must be on terms no less favorable to us than those generally being provided to or available from unrelated third parties or be “fair and reasonable” to us, as determined by our General Partner in good faith, and that, in determining whether a transaction or resolution is “fair and reasonable,” our General Partner may consider the totality of the relationships between the parties involved, including other transactions that may be particularly advantageous or beneficial to us; and
 
  §   provides that our General Partner and its officers and directors will not be liable for monetary damages to us, our limited partners or assignees for any acts or omissions unless there has been a final and non-appealable judgment entered by a court of competent jurisdiction determining that the General Partner or those other persons acted in bad faith or engaged in fraud or willful misconduct.
     By purchasing a common unit, a common unitholder will become bound by the provisions in the partnership agreement, including the provisions discussed above.

 


Table of Contents

Tax Risks to Common Unitholders
     The sale or exchange of 50 percent or more of our capital and profits interests during any twelve-month period will result in the termination of our partnership for federal income tax purposes.
     We will be considered to have terminated for federal income tax purposes if there is a sale or exchange of 50 percent or more of the total interests in our capital and profits within a twelve-month period. Pursuant to the GE EFS Acquisition, GE EFS acquired (i) a 37.3 percent limited partner interest in us (reduced to 29.8 percent after giving effect to the contemporaneous awards under our long-term incentive plan and our July 2007 equity offering), (ii) the 2 percent general partner interest in us, and (iii) the right to receive the incentive distributions associated with the general partner interest. We believe, and will take the position, that the GE Acquisition, together with all other common units sold within the prior twelve-month period, represented a sale or exchange of 50 percent or more of the total interest in our capital and profits interests. Our termination would, among other things, result in the closing of our taxable year for all unitholders on June 18, 2007 and upon any future termination. Such a closing of the books could result in a significant deferral of depreciation deductions allowable in computing our taxable income. We anticipate that the impact of this termination to our unitholders will be an increased amount of taxable income as a percentage of the cash distributed to our unitholders. Although the amount of increase cannot be estimated because it depends upon numerous factors including the timing of the termination, the amount could be material. Moreover, in the case of a unitholder reporting on a taxable year other than a fiscal year ending December 31, the closing of our taxable year may result in more than twelve months of our taxable income or loss being includable in his taxable income for the year of termination. Our termination currently would not affect our classification as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, but instead, we would be treated as a new partnership for tax purposes. If treated as a new partnership, we must make new tax elections and could be subject to penalties if we are unable to determine that a termination occurred.
     Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
     The information required for this item is provided in Note 3, Acquisitions and Dispositions, included in the notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included under Part I, Item 1, which information is incorporated by reference into this item.
Item 6. Exhibits
     The exhibits below are filed as a part of this report:
     Exhibit 12.1 – Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
     Exhibit 31.1 – Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
     Exhibit 31.2 – Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
     Exhibit 32.1 – Section 1350 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer
     Exhibit 32.2 – Section 1350 Certifications of Chief Financial Officer
     Exhibit 99.1 – Regency GP LP Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet

 


Table of Contents

SIGNATURE
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
    REGENCY ENERGY PARTNERS LP
 
       
 
  By:   Regency GP LP, its general partner
 
       
 
  By:   Regency GP LLC, its general partner
 
       
    /s/ Lawrence B. Connors
     
 
       
    Lawrence B. Connors
    Vice President of Accounting and Finance (Duly
    Authorized Officer and Chief Accounting Officer)
August 13, 2007