Table of Contents 

Table of Contents 

Table of Contents 

Table of Contents 

Table of Contents 

Table of Contents 

1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING POLICIES

 

Nature of Operations-Allegiance Bancshares, Inc. (“Allegiance”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Allegiance Bank, a Texas state bank, (the “Bank”, and together with Allegiance, collectively referred to as the “Company”) provide commercial and retail loans and commercial banking services. The Company derives substantially all of its revenues and income from the operation of the Bank. The Company is focused on delivering a wide variety of relationship-driven commercial banking products and community-oriented services tailored to meet the needs of small to mid-sized businesses, professionals and individuals through its 16 offices in Houston, Texas and the surrounding region. The Bank provides its customers with a variety of banking services including checking accounts, savings accounts and certificates of deposit, and its primary lending products are commercial, personal, automobile, mortgage and home improvement loans. The Bank also offers safe deposit boxes, automated teller machines, drive-through services and 24-hour depository facilities.

 

Basis of Presentation-The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and in accordance with guidance provided by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, the condensed financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company on a consolidated basis, and all such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Transactions with Allegiance Bank have been eliminated. The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016. Furthermore, the acquisition of F&M Bancshares, Inc. during the first quarter of 2015 may impact the comparability of year to date 2016 versus year to date 2015 comparable information.

 

Significant Accounting and Reporting Policies

 

The Company’s significant accounting and reporting policies can be found in Note 1 of the Company’s annual financial statements included the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.

 

New Accounting Standards

 

Adoption of New Accounting Standards

 

On January 1, 2016, the Company adopted ASU 2015-16, “Business Combinations (Topic 805) – Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments.” ASU 2015-16 requires that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. The acquirer must record, in the same period’s financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. Additionally, the entity is required to present separately on the face of the income statement or disclose in the notes the portion of the amount recorded in current-period earnings by line item that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date. The adoption of this ASU did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

 

ALLEGIANCE BANCSHARES, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2016

(Unaudited)

 

Newly Issued But Not Yet Effective Accounting Standards

 

ASU 2014-09 “Revenue from Contract with Customers (Topic 606).”  ASU 2014-09 supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Revenue Recognition (Topic 605), and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification.  The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  ASU 2014-09 is currently effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2018 with retrospective application to each prior reporting period presented. The Company is still evaluating the potential impact of ASU 2014-09 on the Company’s financial statements.

 

ASU 2016-02 “Leases (Topic 842).” ASU 2016-02 will, among other things, require lessees to recognize a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. ASU 2016-02 does not significantly change lease accounting requirements applicable to lessors; however, certain changes were made to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and ASC Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” ASU 2016-02 will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2019 and will require transition using a modified retrospective approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of ASU 2016-02 on the Company’s financial statements.

 

ASU 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.” Under ASU 2016-09 all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies related to share-based payment awards should be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement during the period in which they occur. Previously, such amounts were recorded in the pool of excess tax benefits included in additional paid-in capital, if such pool was available. Because excess tax benefits are no longer recognized in additional paid-in capital, the assumed proceeds from applying the treasury stock method when computing earnings per share should exclude the amount of excess tax benefits that would have previously been recognized in additional paid-in capital. Additionally, excess tax benefits should be classified along with other income tax cash flows as an operating activity rather than a financing activity, as was previously the case. ASU 2016-09 also provides that an entity can make an entity-wide accounting policy election to either estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest (current GAAP) or account for forfeitures when they occur. ASU 2016-09 changes the threshold to qualify for equity classification (rather than as a liability) to permit withholding up to the maximum statutory tax rates (rather than the minimum as was previously the case) in the applicable jurisdictions. ASU 2016-09 will be effective on January 1, 2017 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

 

ASU No. 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing.” ASU 2016-10 was issued to clarify ASC Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” related to (i) identifying performance obligations; and (ii) the licensing implementation guidance. The effective date and transition of ASU 2016-10 is the same as the effective date and transition of ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),” as discussed above. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of ASU 2016-10 on the Company’s financial statements.

2. ACQUISITIONS

 

2015 Acquisition

 

Acquisition of F&M Bancshares - On January 1, 2015, the Company completed the acquisition of F&M Bancshares, Inc. (“F&M Bancshares”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary Enterprise Bank (“Enterprise”) headquartered in Houston, Texas. Enterprise operated nine banking locations, seven in Houston, Texas and two in Central Texas: one in Rosebud, Texas and one in Mart, Texas. During the first quarter of 2015, the Company consolidated two of the seven acquired Houston area locations due to the close proximity of these locations to its existing banking locations. The Company acquired F&M Bancshares to further expand its Houston, Texas area market. During the first quarter of 2016, Allegiance completed the sale of the two Central Texas branch locations that were acquired as part of the F&M Bancshares acquisition. Allegiance sold $18.2 million and $26.6 million of loans and deposits, respectively, and recorded an after tax gain of approximately $1.3 million on the sale of these branches.

 

Pursuant to the merger agreement, the Company issued 2,338,520 shares of Company common stock for all outstanding shares of F&M Bancshares capital stock and paid $642 thousand in cash for any fractional and out of state shares held by F&M Bancshares shareholders. The Company recognized initial goodwill of $28.2 million, which is calculated as the excess of both the consideration exchanged and liabilities assumed as compared to the fair value of identifiable assets acquired, none of which is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. F&M Bancshares results of operations were included in the Company’s results beginning January 1, 2015.

 

 

ALLEGIANCE BANCSHARES, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2016

(Unaudited)

 

The Company finalized its valuation of all assets and liabilities acquired, resulting in no changes to purchase accounting adjustments. A summary of the final purchase price allocation is as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

 

Subsequent to the acquisition, the Company paid off the $18.0 million of borrowed funds from F&M Bancshares shareholders by drawing on its borrowing facility with another financial institution. Additionally, the securities acquired from F&M Bancshares were sold subsequent to the acquisition with no income statement impact.

 

On July 15, 2015, the Company redeemed all of the outstanding shares of Series A and Series B preferred stock for an aggregate redemption price of $11.7 million (which is the sum of the liquidation amount plus accrued and unpaid dividends up to but excluding the redemption date). The Company issued the shares of Series A and Series B preferred stock in connection with the F&M Bancshares acquisition, which had preferred stock pursuant to the U.S. Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program.

 

The Company incurred approximately $941 thousand of pre-tax merger related expenses during the year ended December 31, 2015. The merger expenses are reflected on the Company’s income statement for the applicable period and are reported primarily in the categories of salaries and benefits and professional fees.

 

 

ALLEGIANCE BANCSHARES, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2016

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

ALLEGIANCE BANCSHARES, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2016

(Unaudited)

 

 

ALLEGIANCE BANCSHARES, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2016

(Unaudited)

 

Table of Contents 

 

 

ALLEGIANCE BANCSHARES, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2016

(Unaudited)

 

ALLEGIANCE BANCSHARES, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2016

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

ALLEGIANCE BANCSHARES, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2016

(Unaudited)

 

 

ALLEGIANCE BANCSHARES, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2016

(Unaudited)

 

ALLEGIANCE BANCSHARES, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2016

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

ITE M 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Except where the context otherwise requires or where otherwise indicated, in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “Company” and “our business” refer to Allegiance Bancshares, Inc. and our wholly-owned banking subsidiary, Allegiance Bank, a Texas banking association, and the terms “Allegiance Bank” or the “Bank” refer to Allegiance Bank. In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we refer to the Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land metropolitan statistical area as the “Houston metropolitan area.”

 

Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

 

Statements and financial discussion and analysis contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We also may make forward-looking statements in our other documents filed or furnished with the SEC. In addition, our senior management may make forward-looking statements orally to investors, analysts, representatives of the media and others. Statements preceded by, followed by or that otherwise include the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “projects,” “estimates,” “plans” and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “should,” “would,” “may” and “could” are generally forward-looking in nature and not historical facts, although not all forward looking statements include the foregoing. Forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and involve a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. Many possible events or factors could affect our future financial results and performance and could cause such results or performance to differ materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements.

 

While there is no assurance that any list of risks and uncertainties or risk factors is complete, below are certain factors which could cause our actual results to differ from those in our forward-looking statements:

 

•

risks related to the concentration of our business in the Houston metropolitan area, including risks associated with volatility or decreases in oil and gas prices or prolonged periods of lower oil and gas prices;

•

general market conditions and economic trends nationally, regionally and particularly in the Houston metropolitan area;

•

our ability to retain executive officers and key employees and their customer and community relationships;

•

our ability to recruit and retain successful bankers that meet our expectations in terms of customer and community relationships and profitability;

•

risks related to our strategic focus on lending to small to medium-sized businesses;

•

our ability to implement our growth strategy, including through the identification of acquisition candidates that will be accretive to our financial condition and results of operations;

•

risks related to any businesses we acquire in the future, including exposure to potential asset and credit quality risks and unknown or contingent liabilities, the time and costs associated with integrating systems, technology platforms, procedures and personnel, the need for additional capital to finance such transactions and possible failures in realizing the anticipated benefits from such acquisitions;

•

potential impairment on the goodwill we have recorded or may record in connection with business acquisitions;

•

risks associated with our owner-occupied commercial real estate loan and other commercial real estate loan portfolios, including the risks inherent in the valuation of the collateral securing such loans;

•

risks associated with our commercial and industrial loan portfolio, including the risk for deterioration in value of the general business assets that generally secure such loans;

•

the accuracy and sufficiency of the assumptions and estimates we make in establishing reserves for potential loan losses and other estimates;

•

risk of deteriorating asset quality and higher loan charge-offs;

•

time and effort necessary to resolve nonperforming assets;

•

potential changes in the prices, values and sales volumes of commercial and residential real estate securing our real estate loans;

•

changes in market interest rates that affect the pricing of our loans and deposits and our net interest income;

•

potential fluctuations in the market value and liquidity of the securities we hold for sale;

•

risk of impairment of investment securities, goodwill, other intangible assets or deferred tax assets;

•

the effects of competition from a wide variety of local, regional, national and other providers of financial, investment and insurance services, which may adversely affect our pricing and terms;

•

our ability to maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting;

•

risks associated with fraudulent and negligent acts by our customers, employees or vendors;

•

our ability to keep pace with technological change or difficulties when implementing new technologies;

•

risks associated with system failures or failures to protect against cybersecurity threats, such as breaches of our network security;

•

risks associated with data processing system failures and errors;

•

the institution and outcome of litigation and other legal proceeding against us or to which we become subject;

•

our ability to maintain adequate liquidity and to raise necessary capital to fund our acquisition strategy and operations or to meet increased minimum regulatory capital levels;

•

our ability to comply with various governmental and regulatory requirements applicable to financial institutions;

•

the impact of recent and future legislative and regulatory changes, including changes in banking, securities and tax laws and regulations and their application by our regulators, such as the further implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act;

•

governmental monetary and fiscal policies, including the policies of the Federal Reserve;

•

our ability to comply with supervisory actions by federal and state banking agencies;

•

changes in the scope and cost of FDIC insurance and other coverage;

•

systemic risks associated with the soundness of other financial institutions; and

•

other risks and uncertainties listed from time to time in our reports and documents filed with the SEC.

 

Further, these forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they were made and we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which these statements are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, unless required to do so under the federal securities laws. Other factors not identified above, including those described under the headings “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” may also cause actual results to differ materially from those described in our forward looking statements. Most of these factors are difficult to anticipate and are generally beyond our control. You should consider these factors in connection with considering any forward-looking statements that may be made by us.

 

Overview

 

We generate most of our revenues from interest income on loans, service charges on customer accounts and interest income from investments in securities. We incur interest expense on deposits and other borrowed funds and noninterest expenses such as salaries and employee benefits and occupancy expenses. Net interest income is the difference between interest income on earning assets such as loans and securities and interest expense on liabilities such as deposits and borrowings that are used to fund those assets. Net interest income is our largest source of revenue. To evaluate net interest income, we measure and monitor (1) yields on our loans and other interest-earning assets, (2) the interest expenses of our deposits and other funding sources, (3) our net interest spread and (4) our net interest margin. Net interest spread is the difference between rates earned on interest-earning assets and rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest margin is calculated as net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets. Because noninterest-bearing sources of funds, such as noninterest-bearing deposits and stockholders’ equity, also fund interest-earning assets, net interest margin includes the benefit of these noninterest-bearing sources.

 

Our net interest income is affected by changes in the amount and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, referred to as a “volume change.” Periodic changes in the volume and types of loans in our loan portfolio are affected by, among other factors, economic and competitive conditions in Texas and specifically in the Houston metropolitan area, as well as developments affecting the real estate, technology, financial services, insurance, transportation, manufacturing and energy sectors within our target market and throughout the state of Texas.

 

Our net interest income is also affected by changes in yields earned on interest-earning assets and rates paid on interest-bearing deposits and other borrowed funds, referred to as a “rate change.” Fluctuations in market interest rates are driven by many factors, including governmental monetary policies, inflation, deflation, macroeconomic developments, changes in unemployment, the money supply, political and international conditions and conditions in domestic and foreign financial markets.

 

Our objective is to grow and strengthen our community banking franchise by deploying our super-community banking strategy and pursuing select strategic acquisitions in the Houston metropolitan area. We are positioning the Bank to be a leading provider of personalized commercial banking services by emphasizing the strength and capabilities of local bank office management and providing superior customer service. We have made the strategic decision to focus on the Houston metropolitan area because of our deep roots and experience operating through a variety of economic cycles in this large and vibrant market.

 

Super-community banking strategy. Our super-community banking strategy emphasizes community involvement by its directors, officers and employees, which allows us to be responsive in developing our products and services. Our approach produces a clear competitive advantage by delivering an extraordinary customer experience and fostering a culture dedicated to achieving both superior external and internal service levels. Greater efficiency results from our focus on serving a select, but significant, portion of the overall banking market, and on the operational leverage that results from a market share driven by geographic concentration. We focus on establishing personal relationships with customers through superior service, which is accomplished in part by empowering our personnel to make certain business decisions at a local level in order to respond quickly to customers’ needs. We emphasize lending to and banking with small to medium-sized businesses, for which we believe loans can be priced on terms that are more attractive to us than would be achieved by lending to larger businesses. We operate full-service decentralized branches and employ lenders with strong underwriting credentials who are authorized to make loan and underwriting decisions up to prescribed limits at the branch level. We support branch operations with a centralized credit approval process for larger credit relationships, loan operations, information technology, core data processing, accounting, finance, treasury and treasury management support, deposit operations and executive and board oversight.

 

We plan to continue to emphasize the super-community banking strategy to organically grow our presence in the Houston metropolitan area through:

 

• increasing the productivity of existing bankers, as measured by loans, deposits and fee income per banker, while enhancing profitability by leveraging our existing operating platform;

 

• focusing on local and individualized decision-making, allowing us to provide customers with rapid decisions on loan requests, which we believe allows us to effectively compete with larger financial institutions;

 

• identifying and hiring additional seasoned bankers in our existing and target markets in the Houston metropolitan area who will thrive utilizing our super-community banking model, and opening additional branches where we are able to attract seasoned bankers; and

 

• developing new products designed to serve the increasingly diversified Houston economy, while preserving our strong culture of risk management.

 

Select strategic acquisitions. We intend to continue to expand our market position in the Houston metropolitan area through organic growth, including with the establishment of de novo branch locations, and through a disciplined acquisition strategy. We focus on like-minded community banks with similar lending strategies to our own when evaluating acquisition opportunities. We believe that our management’s experience in assessing, executing and integrating target institutions will allow us to capitalize on acquisition opportunities. On January 1, 2015, we completed the acquisition of F&M Bancshares Inc. (“F&M Bancshares”) and its subsidiary bank, Enterprise Bank (“Enterprise”). The results for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015 reflect the combined entity.

 

Recent Developments

 

On January 31, 2016, the Bank completed the sale of its two Central Texas branch locations, that were acquired as part of the F&M Bancshares acquisition, to Incommons Bank, N.A., a national banking association headquartered in Mexia, Texas. Under the terms of the purchase and assumption agreement, Incommons Bank, N.A. acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities associated with the Mart branch location at 714 Texas Avenue in Mart, Texas and the Rosebud branch location at 339 Main Street in Rosebud, Texas. Allegiance sold $18.2 million and $26.6 million of loans and deposits, respectively, and recorded an after tax gain of approximately $1.3 million on the sale of these branches.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

Our accounting policies are integral to understanding our results of operations. Our accounting policies are described in detail in Note 1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. We believe that of our accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity:

 

Securities

 

Securities are classified as available for sale when they might be sold before maturity. Securities available for sale are carried at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses are excluded from earnings and reported, net of tax, as a separate component of stockholders’ equity until realized. Securities within the available for sale portfolio may be used as part of our asset/liability strategy and may be sold in response to changes in interest rate risk, prepayment risk or other similar economic factors.

 

Interest earned on these assets is included in interest income. Interest income includes amortization of purchase premium or discount. Premiums and discounts on securities are amortized on the level-yield method, except for mortgage backed securities where prepayments are anticipated. Gains and losses on sales are recorded on the trade date and determined using the specific identification method.

 

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation. For securities in an unrealized loss position, management considers the extent and duration of the unrealized loss and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer. Management also assesses whether it intends to sell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell, a security in an unrealized loss position before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met, the entire difference between amortized cost and fair value is recognized as impairment through earnings. For debt securities that do not meet the aforementioned criteria, the amount of impairment is split into two components as follows: (1) OTTI related to credit loss, which must be recognized in the income statement, and (2) OTTI related to other factors, which is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. The credit loss is defined as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis. The previous amortized cost basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings becomes the new amortized cost basis of the security.

 

Nonperforming and Past Due Loans

 

Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when payment in full of principal or interest is not expected or upon which principal or interest has been in default for a period of 90 days or more unless the asset is both well secured and in the process of collection. If the decision is made to continue accruing interest on the loan, periodic reviews are made to confirm the accruing status of the loan. Nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days include both smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually classified impaired loans.

 

When available information confirms that specific loans, or portions thereof, are uncollectible, these amounts are charged off against the allowance. All loan types are considered delinquent after 30 days past due and are typically charged off or charged down no later than 120 days past due, with consideration of, but not limited to, the following criteria in determining the need and optional timing of the charge-off or charge-down: 1) the Bank is in the process of repossession or foreclosure and there appears to be a likely deficiency, 2) the collateral securing the loan has been sold and there is an actual deficiency, 3) the Bank is proceeding with lengthy legal action to collect its balance, 4) the borrower is unable to be located or 5) the borrower has filed bankruptcy. Events requiring charge-offs occur when a shortfall is identified between the recorded investment in the loan and the underlying value of the collateral.

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

 

The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance that is established through charges to earnings in the form of a provision for loan losses. The amount of the allowance for loan losses is affected by the following: (1) charge-off of loans that decrease the allowance, (2) subsequent recoveries on loans previously charged off that increase the allowance and (3) provisions for loan losses charged to earnings that increase the allowance.

 

Throughout the year, management estimates the probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio to determine if the allowance for loan losses is adequate to absorb such losses. The allowance for loan losses consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are individually classified as impaired. We follow a loan review program to evaluate the credit risk in the loan portfolio. Loans that have been identified as impaired are reviewed on a quarterly basis in order to determine whether a specific reserve is required. The general component covers non-impaired loans and is based on industry and our specific historical loan loss experience, volume, growth and composition of the loan portfolio, the evaluation of our loan portfolio through our internal loan review process, general current economic conditions both internal and external to us that may affect the borrower’s ability to pay, value of collateral and other qualitative relevant risk factors. Based on a review of these estimates, we adjust the allowance for loan losses to a level determined by management to be adequate. Estimates of loan losses are inherently subjective as they involve an exercise of judgment.

 

Our allowance for loan losses, both in dollars and as a percentage of total loans, may not be comparable to other similar sized institutions due to the impact of acquisition accounting. As part of acquisition accounting, acquired loans are initially recognized at fair value with no corresponding allowance for loan losses. Initial fair value of the loans includes consideration of expected credit losses.

 

Loans for which the terms have been modified, and for which the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, are considered troubled debt restructurings and therefore classified as impaired. Subsequent to identification as a troubled debt restructuring, such loans are then evaluated for impairment on an individual basis whereby we determine the amount of reserve in accordance with the accounting policy for the impaired loans as part of our allowance for loan losses calculation. If a loan is impaired, a specific valuation allowance is allocated, if necessary, so that the loan is reported net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral.

 

Accounting for Acquired Loans

 

At the time of an acquisition, we evaluate loans to determine if they are purchase credit impaired loans. Purchased credit impaired loans are those acquired loans with evidence of credit deterioration for which it was probable at acquisition that we would be unable to collect all contractual payments. We make this determination by considering past due and/or nonaccrual status, prior designation of a troubled debt restructuring, or other factors that may suggest we will not be able to collect all contractual payments. Purchased credit impaired loans are initially recorded at fair value with the difference between fair value and estimated future cash flows accreted over the expected cash flow period as income only to the extent we can reasonably estimate the timing and amount of future cash flows. In this case, these loans would be classified as accruing. In the event we are unable to reasonably estimate timing and amount of future cash flows, the loan is classified as non-accrual. An acquired loan previously classified by the seller as a troubled debt restructuring is no longer classified as such at the date of acquisition. Past due status is reported based on contractual payment status.

 

Our purchase credit impaired loans have generally been de minimis and comprised 0.1% of our loan portfolio at March 31, 2016. Historically, purchased credit impaired loans have been placed on nonaccrual status and reported as such until we were able to reasonably estimate the timing and amount of future expected cash flows. Income associated with purchased credit impaired loans for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and prior periods has been immaterial.

 

All loans not otherwise classified as purchase credit impaired are recorded at fair value with the discount to contractual value accreted over the life of the loan. When determining the allowance for loan losses on acquired loans, we bifurcate the allowance between legacy loans and acquired loans. Loans remain designated as acquired until either (i) loan is renewed or (ii) loan is substantially modified whereby modification results in a new loan. When determining the allowance on acquired loans, the Company estimates principal losses as compared to the Company’s recorded investment, with the recorded investment being net of any unaccreted discounts from the acquisition. At March 31, 2016, we had $253.2 million in acquired loans that have not been renewed or substantially modified, which is net of an unaccreted discount of $1.8 million or 0.70%.

 

Goodwill

 

Goodwill resulting from business combinations is generally determined as the excess of the fair value of the consideration transferred, plus the fair value of any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree, over the fair value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. Goodwill is assessed annually for impairment or when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. Goodwill acquired in a purchase business combination that is determined to have an indefinite useful life, is not amortized, but tested for impairment. We perform our annual impairment test on October 1st. Goodwill is the only intangible asset with an indefinite life on our balance sheet.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

 

ASU 2014-09 “Revenue from Contract with Customers (Topic 606).”  ASU 2014-09 supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Revenue Recognition (Topic 605), and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification.  The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  ASU 2014-09 is currently effective for us beginning on January 1, 2018 with retrospective application to each prior reporting period presented. We are still evaluating the potential impact of ASU 2014-09 on our financial statements.

 

ASU 2016-02 “Leases (Topic 842).” ASU 2016-02 will, among other things, require lessees to recognize a lease liability, which is a lessee‘s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. ASU 2016-02 does not significantly change lease accounting requirements applicable to lessors; however, certain changes were made to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and ASC Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” ASU 2016-02 will be effective for us beginning on January 1, 2019 and will require transition using a modified retrospective approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of ASU 2016-02 on our financial statements.

 

ASU 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.” Under ASU 2016-09 all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies related to share-based payment awards should be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement during the period in which they occur. Previously, such amounts were recorded in the pool of excess tax benefits included in additional paid-in capital, if such pool was available. Because excess tax benefits are no longer recognized in additional paid-in capital, the assumed proceeds from applying the treasury stock method when computing earnings per share should exclude the amount of excess tax benefits that would have previously been recognized in additional paid-in capital. Additionally, excess tax benefits should be classified along with other income tax cash flows as an operating activity rather than a financing activity, as was previously the case. ASU 2016-09 also provides that an entity can make an entity-wide accounting policy election to either estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest (current GAAP) or account for forfeitures when they occur. ASU 2016-09 changes the threshold to qualify for equity classification (rather than as a liability) to permit withholding up to the maximum statutory tax rates (rather than the minimum as was previously the case) in the applicable jurisdictions. ASU 2016-09 will be effective on January 1, 2017 and is not expected to have a significant impact on our financial statements.

 

ASU No. 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing.” ASU 2016-10 was issued to clarify ASC Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” related to (i) identifying performance obligations; and (ii) the licensing implementation guidance. The effective date and transition of ASU 2016-10 is the same as the effective date and transition of ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),” as discussed above. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of ASU 2016-10 on our financial statements.

 

Results of Operations

 

Net income attributable to common stockholders was $6.4 million ($0.49 per diluted common share) for the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared with $3.3 million ($0.33 per diluted common share) for the three months ended March 31, 2015, an increase in net income attributable to common stockholders of $3.0 million or 90.0%. This increase was primarily due to the sale of two Central Texas branch locations during the first quarter 2016 resulting in after tax gain of $1.3 million. Excluding the gain on the sale of the branch locations, net income attributable to common stockholders would have been $5.0 million and net income per diluted common share would have been $0.39 for the three months ended March 31, 2016.

 

Annualized returns on average common equity were 9.70% and 7.56%, annualized returns on average assets were 1.19% and 0.77% and efficiency ratios were 63.80% and 69.19% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015, respectively. The efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing total noninterest expense by the sum of net interest income plus noninterest income, excluding net gains and losses on the sale of branch assets, loans and securities. Additionally, taxes and provision for loan losses are not part of this calculation.

 

Net Interest Income

 

Three months ended March 31, 2016 compared with three months ended March 31, 2015. Net interest income before the provision for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2016 was $21.1 million compared with $18.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015, an increase of $2.3 million, or 12.3%. The increase in net interest income was primarily due to the increase in average interest-earning assets of $324.9 million or 20.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared with the three months ended March 31, 2015. This increase in average interest-earning assets during the three months ended March 31, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015 was primarily the result of organic growth within our loan portfolio.

 

Interest income was $23.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016, an increase of $2.6 million compared with the three months ended March 31, 2015 primarily due to an increase of $1.9 million of interest income and fees on loans during the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 as a result of the increase in average loans outstanding of $247.6 million for the same period. Additionally, during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015, we benefitted from acquisition accounting loan discount accretion of $421 thousand and $1.2 million, respectively.

 

Interest expense was $2.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016, an increase of $318 thousand compared to the three months ended March 31, 2015. This increase was primarily due to an increase in average interest-bearing liabilities of $180.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2015. This increase in interest-bearing liabilities was primarily attributable to the increase in short-term borrowings of $126.4 million and certificates and other time deposits of $64.9 million partially offset by a decrease in borrowings as we paid down $27.5 million on the revolving borrowing agreement in October 2015 with a portion of the proceeds from the Company’s initial public offering.

 

Tax equivalent net interest margin, defined as net interest income adjusted for tax-free income divided by average interest-earning assets, for the three months ended March 31, 2016 was 4.45%, a decrease of 27 basis points compared to 4.72% for the three months ended March 31, 2015. Tax equivalent adjustments to net interest margin are the result of increasing income from tax-free securities by an amount equal to the taxes that would have been paid if the income were fully taxable based on a 35% federal tax rate, thus making tax-exempt yields comparable to taxable asset yields. The impact of net acquisition accounting adjustments of $491 thousand and $1.4 million on the tax equivalent net interest margin was an increase of 10 basis points and 34 basis points for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015, respectively.

 

 

 

The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the total dollar amount of average balances, interest income from average interest-earning assets and the annualized resultant yields, as well as the interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, expressed in both dollars and rates. Any nonaccruing loans have been included in the table as loans carrying a zero yield.

 

		Three Months Ended March 31,
		2016												2015
		Average Balance				Interest Earned/ Interest Paid				Average Yield/Rate				Average Balance				Interest Earned/ Interest Paid				Average Yield/Rate
		(Dollars in thousands)
Assets
Interest-Earning Assets:
Loans(3)		$	1,663,711			$	22,228				5.37	%		$	1,416,159			$	20,306				5.82	%
Securities			186,460				1,081				2.33	%			92,634				439				1.92	%
Deposits in other financial institutions			91,824				142				0.62	%			108,331				74				0.28	%
Total interest-earning assets			1,941,995			$	23,451				4.86	%			1,617,124			$	20,819				5.22	%
Allowance for loan losses			(13,487	)											(8,492	)
Noninterest-earning assets			226,946												225,894
Total assets		$	2,155,454											$	1,834,526
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits		$	95,506			$	67				0.28	%		$	106,490			$	96				0.37	%
Money market and savings deposits			433,139				477				0.44	%			405,497				417				0.42	%
Certificates and other time deposits			614,216				1,560				1.02	%			549,289				1,143				0.84	%
Short-term borrowings			126,374				139				0.44	%			-				-				0.00	%
Subordinated debt			9,098				117				5.19	%			8,900				163				7.43	%
Other borrowed funds			569				7				5.23	%			28,069				230				3.32	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities			1,278,902			$	2,367				0.74	%			1,098,245			$	2,049				0.76	%
Noninterest-Bearing liabilities:
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits			605,969												531,492
Other liabilities			7,186												6,945
Total liabilities			1,892,057												1,636,682
Stockholders' equity			263,397												197,844
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity		$	2,155,454											$	1,834,526
Net interest rate spread											4.12	%											4.46	%
Net interest income and margin(1)						$	21,084				4.37	%						$	18,770				4.71	%
Net interest income and margin (tax equivalent)(2)						$	21,483				4.45	%						$	18,839				4.72	%

_____________________ 

(1)

The net interest margin is equal to annualized net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.

(2)

In order to make pretax income and resultant yields on tax-exempt investments and loans comparable to those on taxable investments and loans, a tax-equivalent adjustment has been computed using a federal income tax rate of 35% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015 and other applicable effective tax rates.

(3)

Includes loans held for sale at March 31, 2015.

 

The following table presents information regarding the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense for the periods indicated for each major component of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and distinguishes between the changes attributable to changes in volume and changes in interest rates. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both rate and volume that cannot be segregated have been allocated to rate.

 

 

		For the Three Months Ended March 31,
		2016 vs. 2015
		Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in
		Volume				Rate				Days				Total
		(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-Earning assets:
Loans		$	3,579			$	(1,892	)		$	235			$	1,922
Securities			446				191				5				642
Deposits in other financial institutions			(11	)			78				1				68
Total increase (decrease) in interest income			4,014				(1,623	)			241				2,632
Interest-Bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits			(10	)			(20	)			1				(29	)
Money market and savings deposits			28				27				5				60
Certificates and other time deposits			136				268				13				417
Short-term borrowings			-				139				-				139
Subordinated debt			4				(52	)			2				(46	)
Other borrowed funds			(229	)			3				3				(223	)
Total increase (decrease) in interest expense			(71	)			365				24				318
Increase (decrease) in net interest income		$	4,085			$	(1,988	)		$	217			$	2,314

 

Provision for Loan Losses

 

Our allowance for loan losses is established through charges to income in the form of the provision in order to bring our allowance for loan losses to a level deemed appropriate by management. The allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was $13.5 million and $13.1 million, respectively, representing 0.80% and 0.78% of total loans as of such dates. Acquired loans are initially recorded at fair value based on a discounted cash flow valuation methodology that considers, among other things, projected default rates, losses given existing defaults, and recovery rates. No carryover of any allowance for loan losses occurs when loans are acquired. We recorded a $710 thousand provision for loan losses for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 and a $683 thousand provision for the quarter ended March 31, 2015. The increase in the provision was primarily due to net charge-offs of $51 thousand for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 compared to net recoveries of $11 thousand for the quarter ended March 31, 2015.

 

Noninterest Income

 

Our primary sources of noninterest income are service charges on deposit accounts and nonsufficient funds fees. Noninterest income does not include loan origination fees which are recognized over the life of the related loan as an adjustment to yield using the interest method.

 

Three months ended March 31, 2016 compared with three months ended March 31, 2015. Noninterest income totaled $3.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared with $866 thousand for the same period in 2015, an increase of $2.4 million or 281.5%. This increase was primarily due to the gain on the sale of the two Central Texas branch locations completed during the first quarter of 2016.

 

The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the major categories of noninterest income:

 

		For the Three Months
		Ended March 31,								Increase
		2016				2015				(Decrease)
		(Dollars in thousands)
Nonsufficient funds fees		$	163			$	165			$	(2	)
Service charges on deposit accounts			145				175				(30	)
Debit card and ATM card income			165				132				33
Gain on sale of branch assets			2,050				-				2,050
Loss on sales of other real estate			-				(6	)			6
Bank owned life insurance income			166				92				74
Rebate from correspondent bank			150				69				81
Other(1)			465				239				226
Total noninterest income		$	3,304			$	866			$	2,438

 

(1)

Other includes wire transfer and letter of credit fees, among other items.

 

Noninterest Expense

 

Three months ended March 31, 2016 compared with three months ended March 31, 2015. Noninterest expense was $14.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared to $13.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015, an increase of $667 thousand or 4.9%. This increase was primarily attributable to additional salaries and benefits related to the hiring of several key income producing employees over the last year.

 

The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the major categories of noninterest expense:

 

		For the Three Months
		Ended March 31,								Increase
		2016				2015				(Decrease)
		(Dollars in thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits(1)		$	9,273			$	8,942			$	331
Net occupancy and equipment			1,232				1,084				148
Depreciation			417				367				50
Data processing and software amortization			653				626				27
Professional fees			534				480				54
Regulatory assessments and FDIC insurance			345				374				(29	)
Core deposit intangibles amortization			199				208				(9	)
Communications			280				334				(54	)
Advertising			201				138				63
Other real estate expense			50				1				49
Printing and supplies			46				113				(67	)
Other			1,023				919				104
Total noninterest expense		$	14,253			$	13,586			$	667

 

(1)

Total salaries and employee benefits includes $354 thousand and $311 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015, respectively, of stock based compensation expense.

 

Salaries and Employee Benefits. Salaries and benefits increased $331 thousand, or 3.7%, for the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015. This increase was primarily due to additional income-producing employees hired to support our growth over the past year.

 

Net Occupancy and Equipment. Net occupancy and equipment expenses increased $148 thousand, or 13.7%, for the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015. This increase is primarily attributable to a CAM catch-up for our West Belt branch location.

 

Efficiency Ratio

 

The efficiency ratio is a supplemental financial measure utilized in management’s internal evaluation of our performance and is not defined under generally accepted accounting principles. We calculate our efficiency ratio by dividing total noninterest expense, excluding loan loss provisions, by net interest income plus noninterest income, excluding net gains and losses on the sale of branch assets, loans and securities. Additionally, taxes are not part of this calculation. An increase in the efficiency ratio indicates that more resources are being utilized to generate the same volume of income, while a decrease would indicate a more efficient allocation of resources. Our efficiency ratio was 63.80% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared to 69.19% for the three months ended March 31, 2015.

 

We monitor the efficiency ratio in comparison with changes in our total assets and loans, and we believe that maintaining or reducing the efficiency ratio during periods of growth, as we did from 2015 to 2016, demonstrates the scalability of our operating platform. We expect to continue to benefit from our scalable platform in future periods as we believe we have already incurred a significant portion of the overhead expense necessary to support our growth.

 

Income Taxes

 

The amount of federal and state income tax expense is influenced by the amount of pre-tax income, the amount of tax-exempt income and the amount of other nondeductible expenses. Income tax expense increased $1.2 million, or 61.9%, to $3.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared with $1.9 million for the same period in 2015. The effective tax rates were 32.6% and 35.3% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015, respectively. The effective tax rate decreased for the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 due to the increase in tax free income from the purchase of additional municipal securities.

 

Financial Condition

 

Loan Portfolio

 

At March 31, 2016, total loans (including loans held for sale) were $1.72 billion, an increase of $36.4 million, or 2.2% compared with December 31, 2015 primarily due to organic growth in our loan portfolio.

 

Total loans (including loans held for sale) as a percentage of deposits were 93.2% and 95.6% as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Our capital positions in 2015 and year to date 2016 have allowed us to grow our loan portfolio at a faster rate than we grew our deposits. Total loans as a percentage of assets were 77.7% and 80.6% as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

 

Lending activities originate from the efforts of our lenders, with an emphasis on lending to small to medium-sized businesses and companies, professionals and individuals located in the Houston metropolitan area.

 

The following table summarizes our loan portfolio by type of loan as of the dates indicated:

 

		March 31, 2016								December 31, 2015
		Amount				Percent				Amount				Percent
		(Dollars in thousands)
Loans held for sale (1)		$	-							$	27,887				1.7	%
Commercial and industrial			372,056				21.7	%			383,044				22.7	%
Mortgage warehouse			86,157				5.0	%			59,071				3.5	%
Real estate:
Commercial real estate (including
multi-family residential)			770,252				44.8	%			745,595				44.4	%
Commercial real estate construction
and land development			167,810				9.8	%			154,646				9.2	%
1-4 family residential (including home equity)			209,704				12.2	%			205,200				12.2	%
Residential construction			100,611				5.9	%			93,848				5.6	%
Consumer and other			10,858				0.6	%			11,761				0.7	%
Total loans held for investment			1,717,448				100.0	%			1,653,165				98.3	%
Total loans			1,717,448								1,681,052				100.0	%
Allowance for Loan Losses			(13,757	)							(13,098	)
Loans, net		$	1,703,691							$	1,667,954

 

(1)

Consisted of loans at two former F&M Bancshares locations acquired in 2015 and sold during the first quarter of 2016. At December 31, 2015, loans held for sale consisted of $13.2 million of commercial and industrial loans, $11.6 million of commercial real estate (including multi-family residential) loans, $2.3 million of 1-4 family residential (including home equity) loans and $803 thousand of consumer and other loans. Loans held for sale were carried at lower of aggregate cost or fair value.

 

The principal categories of our loan portfolio (including loans held for sale) are discussed below:

 

Commercial and Industrial. We make commercial loans in our market area that are underwritten on the basis of the borrower’s ability to service the debt from income. Our commercial and industrial loan portfolio decreased $24.1 million, or 6.1%, to $372.1 million as of March 31, 2016 compared to $396.2 million as of December 31, 2015 due primarily to the sale of the two Central Texas branch locations during the first quarter 2016.

 

Our exposure to oil and gas exploration and production companies is roughly 3.3% of our total loan portfolio as of March 31, 2016. We define these customers as those on whom the prices of oil and gas have a significant operational or financial impact. These loans carry an overall allowance of 2.5% at March 31, 2016. The collateral on these loans includes industrial commercial real estate, working capital assets, machining equipment, drilling equipment, general industrial equipment, vehicles, airplanes, ranch property, insurance policies, notes receivable and a hotel. In addition, these loans are all personally guaranteed.

 

Mortgage warehouse. We make loans to unaffiliated mortgage loan originators collateralized by mortgage promissory notes which are segregated in our mortgage warehouse portfolio.  These promissory notes originated by our mortgage warehouse customers carry terms and conditions as would be expected in the competitive permanent mortgage market and serve as collateral under a traditional mortgage warehouse arrangement whereby such promissory notes are warehoused under a revolving credit facility to allow for the end investor (or purchaser) of the note to receive a complete loan package and remit funds to the bank.  For mortgage promissory notes secured by residential property, the warehouse time is normally 10 to 20 days.  For mortgage promissory notes secured by commercial property, the warehouse time is normally 40 to 50 days.  The funded balance of the mortgage warehouse portfolio can have significant fluctuation based upon market demand for the product, level of home sales and refinancing activity, market interest rates, and velocity of end investor processing times. Our mortgage warehouse portfolio increased $27.1 million, or 45.9%, to $86.2 million as of March 31, 2016 compared to $59.1 million as of December 31, 2015. Volumes fluctuate based on the level of market demand for the product, as well as overall market interest rates and tend to peak at the end of each month.

 

Commercial Real Estate (Including Multi-Family Residential). We make loans collateralized by owner-occupied, nonowner-occupied and multi-family real estate to finance the purchase or ownership of real estate. As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, 54.1% and 52.8%, respectively, of our commercial real estate loans were owner-occupied. Our commercial real estate loan portfolio increased $13.1 million, or 1.7%, to $770.3 million as of March 31, 2016 from $757.2 million as of December 31, 2015, as a result of organic loan growth of $12.7 million in the commercial real estate portfolio during the first three months of 2016.

 

Commercial Real Estate Construction and Land Development. We make commercial real estate construction and land development loans to fund commercial construction, land acquisition and real estate development construction. Commercial real estate construction and land development land loans increased $13.2 million, or 8.5%, to $167.8 million as of March 31, 2016 compared to $154.6 million as of December 31, 2015 as a result of organic loan growth of $13.1 million in the commercial real estate construction portfolio during the first three months of 2016.

 

1-4 Family Residential (Including Home Equity). Our residential real estate loans include the origination of 1-4 family residential mortgage loans (including home equity and home improvement loans and home equity lines of credit) collateralized by owner-occupied residential properties located in our market areas. Our residential real estate portfolio (including home equity) increased $2.2 million, or 1.1%, to $209.7 million as of March 31, 2016 from $207.5 million as of December 31, 2015 as a result of organic loan growth of $2.1 million in the 1-4 family residential portfolio during the first three months of 2016.

 

Residential Construction. We make residential construction loans to home builders and individuals to fund the construction of single-family residences with the understanding that such loans will be repaid from the proceeds of the sale of the homes by builders or with the proceeds of a mortgage loan. These loans are secured by the real property being built and are made based on our assessment of the value of the property on an as-completed basis. Our residential construction loans portfolio increased $6.8 million, or 7.2%, to $100.6 million as of March 31, 2016 from $93.8 million as of December 31, 2015 as a result of organic loan growth of $6.8 million in the residential construction portfolio during the first three months of 2016.

 

Consumer and Other. Our consumer and other loan portfolio is made up of loans made to individuals for personal purposes. Our consumer and other loan portfolio decreased $1.7 million, or 13.6%, to $10.9 million as of March 31, 2016 from $12.6 million as of December 31, 2015.

 

Asset Quality

 

Nonperforming Assets

 

We have procedures in place to assist us in maintaining the overall quality of our loan portfolio. We have established underwriting guidelines to be followed by our officers, and monitor our delinquency levels for any negative or adverse trends.

 

We had $7.0 million and $5.2 million in nonperforming loans as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

 

The following table presents information regarding nonperforming assets as of the dates indicated.

 

		As of March 31,				As of December 31,
		2016				2015
		(Dollars in thousands)
Nonaccrual loans:
Loans held for sale		$	-			$	209
Commercial and industrial			2,700				2,664
Mortgage warehouse			-				-
Real estate:
Commercial real estate (including multi-family residential)			3,293				2,006
Commercial real estate construction and land development			-				-
1-4 family residential (including home equity)			934				239
Residential construction			-				-
Consumer and other			52				66
Total nonaccrual loans			6,979				5,184
Accruing loans 90 or more days past due			-				-
Total nonperforming loans			6,979				5,184
Repossessed assets			131				131
Other real estate			1,397				-
Total nonperforming assets		$	8,507			$	5,315
Restructured loans(1)		$	6,008			$	491
Nonperforming assets to total assets			0.38	%			0.25	%
Nonperforming loans to total loans			0.41	%			0.31	%

 

(1)

Restructured loans represent the balance at the end of the respective period for those loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring that are not already presented as a nonperforming loan.

 

Potential problem loans consist of loans that are performing in accordance with contractual terms but for which management has concerns about the ability of an obligor to continue to comply with repayment terms because of the obligor’s potential operating or financial difficulties. Management monitors these loans closely and reviews their performance on a regular basis. Potential problem loans contain potential weaknesses that could improve, persist or further deteriorate. At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we had $6.0 million and $6.4 million, respectively, in loans of this type which are not included in any of the nonaccrual or 90 days past due loan categories. At March 31, 2016, potential problem loans consisted of three credit relationships. Of the total outstanding balance at March 31, 2016, 99.9% related to two customers in the energy related industry and 0.1% related to one customer in the medical equipment industry. Weakness in these organizations’ operating performance, financial condition and borrowing base deficits for certain energy related credits, among other factors, have caused us to heighten the attention given to these credits. As such, all of the loans identified as potential problem loans at March 31, 2016 were graded as substandard accruing loans. Potential problem loans impact the allocation of our allowance for loan losses as a result of our risk grade allocation methodology.

 

Allowance for Credit Losses

 

The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance that is established through charges to earnings in the form of a provision for loan losses. The amount of the allowance for loan losses is affected by the following: (1) provisions for loan losses charged to earnings that increase the allowance, (2) charge-offs of loans that occur when loans are deemed uncollectible and decrease the allowance and (3) recoveries on loans previously charged off that increase the allowance.

 

All loans acquired from F&M Bancshares were recorded at fair value without a carryover of the F&M Bancshares allowance for loan losses. The discount recognized on acquired loans is prospectively accreted, increasing our basis in such loans. Due to acquisition accounting, our allowance for loan losses to total loans may not be comparable to our peers particularly as it relates to the allowance to gross loan percentage and the allowance to nonperforming loans. Recognizing that acquired purchased credit impaired loans have been de minimis, we monitor credit quality trends on a post-acquisition basis with an emphasis on past due, charge-off, classified loan, and nonperforming trends. The amount of discount recorded by the Company on the date of the F&M Bancshares acquisition was $6.0 million, or 1.47%, on loans acquired. The remaining discount on F&M Bancshares acquired loans as of March 31, 2016 was $1.8 million, or 0.70%. The discount on purchased loans considers anticipated credit losses on that portfolio, therefore no allowance for credit losses was established on the acquisition date. The unaccreted discount represents additional protection against potential losses and is presented as a reduction of the recorded investment in the loans rather than an allowance for loan losses. We will continue to look at the portfolio for credit deterioration and establish additional allowances over the remaining discount as needed.

 

At March 31, 2016, our allowance for loan losses amounted to $13.8 million, or 0.80%, of total loans compared with $13.1 million, or 0.78%, as of December 31, 2015. Excluding the acquired loans at March 31, 2016, the allowance would have been 0.94% of total loans. The increase in the allowance of $659 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2016 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 was primarily due to an increase in the required reserve associated with organic loan growth. We believe that the allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was adequate to cover probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio as of such dates. The ratio of annualized net charge-offs to average loans outstanding was 0.01% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared to 0.00% for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 0.06% for the year ended December 31, 2015.

 

The following table presents, as of and for the periods indicated, an analysis of the allowance for loan losses and other related data:

 

		As of and for the Three Months Ended March 31,
		2016				2015
		(Dollars in thousands)
Average loans outstanding		$	1,663,711			$	1,416,159
Gross loans outstanding at end of period			1,717,448				1,444,732
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period			13,098				8,246
Provision for loan losses			710				683
Charge-offs:
Commercial and industrial loans			(1	)			(12	)
Mortgage warehouse			-				-
Real estate:
Commercial real estate (including multi-family residential)			(86	)			-
Commercial real estate construction and land development			-				-
1-4 family residential (including home equity)			-				-
Residential construction			-				-
Consumer and other			(10	)			(16	)
Total charge-offs for all loan types			(97	)			(28	)
Recoveries:
Commercial and industrial loans			35				18
Mortgage warehouse			-				-
Real estate:
Commercial real estate (including multi-family residential)			-				-
Commercial real estate construction and land development			-				-
1-4 family residential (including home equity)			10				-
Residential construction			-				19
Consumer and other			1				2
Total recoveries for all loan types			46				39
Net charge-offs			(51	)			11
Allowance for loan losses at end of period		$	13,757			$	8,940
Allowance for loan losses to total loans			0.80	%			0.62	%
Net charge-offs to average loans (1)			0.01	%			0.00	%
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans			197.12	%			130.47	%

 

(1)

Interim period annualized.

 

Available for Sale Securities

 

We use our securities portfolio to provide a source of liquidity, to provide an appropriate return on funds invested, to manage interest rate risk, to meet pledging requirements, and to meet regulatory capital requirements. As of March 31, 2016, the carrying amount of investment securities totaled $215.4 million, an increase of $50.3 million, or 30.5%, compared with $165.1 million as of December 31, 2015. Securities represented 9.7% and 7.9% of total assets as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

 

All of the securities in our securities portfolio are classified as available for sale. Securities classified as available for sale are measured at fair value in the financial statements with unrealized gains and losses reported, net of tax, as accumulated comprehensive income or loss until realized. Interest earned on securities is included in interest income.

 

The following table summarizes the amortized cost and fair value of the securities in our securities portfolio as of the dates shown:

 

		March 31, 2016
						Gross				Gross
		Amortized				Unrealized				Unrealized				Fair
		Cost				Gains				Losses				Value
		(Dollars in thousands)
Available for Sale
U.S. Government and agency securities		$	8,691			$	552			$	-			$	9,243
Municipal securities			151,127				3,408				(28	)			154,507
Agency mortgage-backed pass-through securities			28,072				506				(148	)			28,430
Other securities			23,205				17				(1	)			23,221
Total		$	211,095			$	4,483			$	(177	)		$	215,401

 

		December 31, 2015
						Gross				Gross
		Amortized				Unrealized				Unrealized				Fair
		Cost				Gains				Losses				Value
		(Dollars in thousands)
Available for Sale
U.S. Government and agency securities		$	8,674			$	412			$	-			$	9,086
Municipal securities			123,809				2,575				(35	)			126,349
Agency mortgage-backed pass-through securities			29,511				397				(246	)			29,662
Total		$	161,994			$	3,384			$	(281	)		$	165,097

 

As of March 31, 2016, we do not expect to sell any securities classified as available for sale with material unrealized losses; and management believes that we more likely than not will not be required to sell any securities before their anticipated recovery at which time we will receive full value for the securities. The unrealized losses are largely due to increases in market interest rates over the yields available at the time the underlying securities were purchased. Management does not believe any of the securities are impaired due to reasons of credit quality. The fair value is expected to recover as the securities approach their maturity date or repricing date or if market yields for such investments decline. Accordingly, as of March 31, 2016, management believes any impairment in our securities is temporary, and no impairment loss has been realized in our consolidated statements of income.

 

 

 

The following table summarizes the contractual maturity of securities and their weighted average yields as of the dates indicated. The contractual maturity of a mortgage-backed security is the date at which the last underlying mortgage matures. Available for sale securities are shown at amortized cost. For purposes of the table below, municipal securities are calculated on a tax equivalent basis.

 

 

		March 31, 2016
		Within One Year								After One Year but Within Five Years								After Five Years but Within Ten Years								After Ten Years								Total
		Amount				Yield				Amount				Yield				Amount				Yield				Amount				Yield				Total				Yield
		(Dollars in thousands)
Available for Sale
U.S. government and agency securities		$	-				0.00	%		$	2,011				1.46	%		$	6,680				3.23	%		$	-				0.00	%		$	8,691				2.82	%
Municipal securities			6,170				1.63	%			15,923				2.62	%			43,915				3.40	%			85,119				4.54	%			151,127				3.89	%
Agency mortgage-backed pass-through securities			-				0.00	%			-				0.00	%			4,899				2.18	%			23,173				2.55	%			28,072				2.48	%
Other securities			-				0.00	%			23,205				2.43	%			-				0.00	%			-				0.00	%			23,205				2.43	%
Total		$	6,170				1.63	%		$	41,139				2.45	%		$	55,494				3.28	%		$	108,292				4.11	%		$	211,095				3.50	%

 

 

		December 31, 2015
		Within One Year								After One Year but Within Five Years								After Five Years but Within Ten Years								After Ten Years								Total
		Amount				Yield				Amount				Yield				Amount				Yield				Amount				Yield				Total				Yield
		(Dollars in thousands)
Available for Sale
U.S. government and agency securities		$	-				0.00	%		$	2,010				1.46	%		$	6,664				3.23	%		$	-				0.00	%		$	8,674				2.82	%
Municipal securities			7,176				1.48	%			15,290				2.53	%			32,078				3.22	%			69,265				4.75	%			123,809				3.89	%
Agency mortgage-backed pass-through securities			-				0.00	%			-				0.00	%			4,328				2.22	%			25,183				2.54	%			29,511				2.49	%
Agency collateralized mortgage obligations			-				0.00	%			-				0.00	%			-				0.00	%			-				0.00	%			-				0.00	%
Total		$	7,176				1.48	%		$	17,300				2.41	%		$	43,070				3.12	%		$	94,448				4.16	%		$	161,994				3.58	%

 

The contractual maturity of mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations is not a reliable indicator of their expected life because borrowers may have the right to prepay their obligations. Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are typically issued with stated principal amounts and are backed by pools of mortgage loans with varying maturities. The term of the underlying mortgages and loans may vary significantly due to the ability of a borrower to prepay and, in particular, monthly pay downs on mortgage-backed securities tend to cause the average life of the securities to be much different than the stated contractual maturity. During a period of increasing interest rates, fixed rate mortgage-backed securities do not tend to experience heavy prepayments of principal and, consequently, the average life of this security will be lengthened. If interest rates begin to fall, prepayments may increase, thereby shortening the estimated life of this security.

 

As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we did not own securities of any one issuer (other than the U.S. government and its agencies or sponsored entities) for which the aggregate adjusted cost exceeded 10% of our consolidated stockholders’ equity.

 

The average yield of our securities portfolio was 2.33% during the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared with 1.92% for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The increase in average yield during the first three months of 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 was primarily due to our investment in higher-yielding, longer-duration securities.

 

Goodwill and Core Deposit Intangibles

 

Our goodwill as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was $39.4 million for both periods. Goodwill resulting from business combinations represents the excess of the consideration paid over the fair value of the net assets acquired. Goodwill is assessed annually for impairment or when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.

 

Our core deposit intangibles, net as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, was $4.6 million and $5.2 million, respectively, and decreased primarily as a result of the sale of the two Central Texas branch locations during the first quarter of 2016. Core deposit intangibles arising from the F&M Bancshares acquisition and the Independence acquisition are amortized using a straight-line amortization method over its estimated useful life of seven to nine years.

 

Deposits

 

Our lending and investing activities are primarily funded by deposits. We offer a variety of deposit accounts having a wide range of interest rates and terms including demand, savings, money market and certificates and other time accounts. We rely primarily on convenient locations, personalized service and our customer relationships to attract and retain these deposits. We seek customers that will both engage in a lending and deposit relationship with us.

 

Total deposits at March 31, 2016 were $1.84 billion, an increase of $83.5 million, or 4.7%, compared with $1.76 billion at December 31, 2015. Noninterest-bearing deposits at March 31, 2016 were $684.2 million, an increase of $63.9 million, or 10.3%, compared with $620.3 million at December 31, 2015. Interest-bearing deposits at March 31, 2016 were $1.16 billion, an increase of $19.6 million, or 1.7%, compared with $1.14 billion at December 31, 2015.

 

Borrowings

We have an available line of credit with the FHLB of Dallas, which allows us to borrow on a collateralized basis. Our FHLB advances are short-term borrowings and are used to manage liquidity as needed. Maturing advances are replaced by drawing on available cash, making additional borrowings or through increased customer deposits. At March 31, 2016, we had a total borrowing capacity of $715.5 million, of which $600.0 million was available and $115.5 million was outstanding. Short-term FHLB advances of $85.0 million were outstanding at March 31, 2016, at a weighted average rate of 0.42%. Letters of credit were $30.5 million at March 31, 2016, of which $2.5 million will expire in August 2016, $25.0 million will expire in October 2016 and $3.0 million will expire in February 2017.

 

Credit Agreement

 

As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we had $569 thousand of indebtedness owed to another financial institution. On December 22, 2014, in connection with the acquisition of F&M Bancshares, we entered into a revolving credit agreement. Pursuant to this agreement, we borrowed approximately $10.1 million in December 2014 to pay off the prior indebtedness. In January 2015, we borrowed an additional $18.0 million under the revolving credit agreement to repay debt that F&M Bancshares owed. In October 2015, we paid down $27.5 million under the revolving credit agreement with a portion of the proceeds from the Company’s initial public offering.

 

Our borrowing under the revolving credit agreement matures in December 2021. Interest accrues on borrowed funds at the Prime Rate minus 25 basis points, which equated to approximately 3.25% at March 31, 2016. Interest payments are due quarterly. The revolving credit agreement is secured by 100% of the capital stock of the Bank.

 

The maximum commitment to advance funds under the revolving credit agreement is $30.0 million, which is reduced by $4.3 million on each December 22nd, beginning on December 22, 2015. We are required to repay any outstanding balance in excess of the then-current maximum commitment amount.

 

The revolving credit agreement contains certain restrictive covenants, including limitations on our ability to incur additional indebtedness or engage in certain fundamental corporate transactions, such as mergers, reorganizations and recapitalizations. Additionally, the Bank is required to maintain a “well-capitalized” rating, a minimum return on assets of 0.65%, measured quarterly, a ratio of loan loss reserve to non-performing loans equal to or greater than 75%, measured quarterly, and a ratio of non-performing assets to aggregate equity plus loan loss reserves minus intangible assets of less than 35%, measured quarterly. As of March 31, 2016, we believe we are in compliance with these debt covenants and the lender has not delivered any notice of noncompliance under the terms of the applicable credit documents.

 

Contractual Obligations

 

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and other commitments to make future payments as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (other than deposit obligations), which consist of our future cash payments associated with our contractual obligations pursuant to our non-cancelable operating leases and our indebtedness owed to another financial institution. Payments related to leases are based on actual payments specified in underlying contracts.

 

		As of March 31, 2016
						More than 1				3 years or
						year but less				more but less				5 years
		1 year or less				than 3 years				than 5 years				or more				Total
		(Dollars in thousands)
Bank loan		$	-			$	-			$	-			$	569			$	569
Operating leases			1,723				2,460				3,220				4,125				11,528
Total		$	1,723			$	2,460			$	3,220			$	4,694			$	12,097

 

		As of December 31, 2015
						More than 1				3 years or
						year but less				more but less				5 years
		1 year or less				than 3 years				than 5 years				or more				Total
		(Dollars in thousands)
Bank loan		$	-			$	-			$	-			$	569			$	569
Operating leases			2,379				2,412				3,119				3,867				11,777
Total		$	2,379			$	2,412			$	3,119			$	4,436			$	12,346

 

Off-Balance Sheet Items

 

In the normal course of business, we enter into various transactions, which, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, are not included in our consolidated balance sheets. We enter into these transactions to meet the financing needs of our customers. These transactions include commitments to extend credit and standby and commercial letters of credit, which involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in our consolidated balance sheets.

 

Commitments to Extend Credit. We enter into contractual commitments to extend credit, normally with fixed expiration dates or termination clauses, at specified rates and for specific purposes. Substantially all of our commitments to extend credit are contingent upon customers maintaining specific credit standards at the time of loan funding. We minimize our exposure to loss under these commitments by subjecting them to credit approval and monitoring procedures. The amount and type of collateral obtained, if considered necessary by us, upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer. Management assesses the credit risk associated with certain commitments to extend credit in determining the level of the allowance for loan losses.

 

Standby Letters of Credit. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by us to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. If the customer does not perform in accordance with the terms of the agreement with the third party, we would be required to fund the commitment and we would have the rights to the underlying collateral. The maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make is represented by the contractual amount of the commitment. Our policies generally require that standby letter of credit arrangements contain security and debt covenants similar to those contained in loan agreements.

 

As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we had outstanding $460.2 million and $474.9 million, respectively, in commitments to extend credit and $8.5 million and $9.5 million, respectively, in commitments associated with outstanding standby letters of credit. Since commitments associated with letters of credit and commitments to extend credit may expire unused, the total outstanding may not necessarily reflect the actual future cash funding requirements.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Liquidity

 

Liquidity is the measure of our ability to meet the cash flow requirements of depositors and borrowers, while at the same time meeting our operating, capital, strategic cash flow needs and to maintain reserve requirements to operate on an ongoing basis and manage unexpected events, all at a reasonable cost. During the three months ended March 31, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015, our liquidity needs have been met by core deposits, security and loan maturities and amortizing investment and loan portfolios. The Bank has access to purchased funds from correspondent banks and advances from the FHLB are available under a security and pledge agreement to take advantage of investment opportunities.

 

Our largest source of funds is deposits and our largest use of funds is loans. Our average loans increased $247.6 million, or 17.5%, for the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared with the three months ended March 31, 2015. We predominantly invest excess deposits in Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas balances, securities, interest-bearing deposits at other banks or other short-term liquid investments until the funds are needed to fund loan growth. Our securities portfolio had a weighted average life of 6.7 years and modified duration of 5.8 years at March 31, 2016, and a weighted average life of 7.0 years and modified duration of 6.0 years at December 31, 2015.

 

As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we had no exposure to future cash requirements associated with known uncertainties or capital expenditures of a material nature.

 

Capital Resources

 

Capital management consists of providing equity to support our current and future operations. We are subject to capital adequacy requirements imposed by the Federal Reserve and the Bank is subject to capital adequacy requirements imposed by the FDIC. Both the Federal Reserve and the FDIC have adopted risk-based capital requirements for assessing bank holding company and bank capital adequacy. These standards define capital and establish minimum capital requirements in relation to assets and off-balance sheet exposure, adjusted for credit risk. The risk-based capital standards currently in effect are designed to make regulatory capital requirements more sensitive to differences in risk profiles among bank holding companies and banks, to account for off-balance sheet exposure and to minimize disincentives for holding liquid assets. Assets and off-balance sheet items are assigned to broad risk categories, each with appropriate relative risk weights. The resulting capital ratios represent capital as a percentage of total risk-weighted assets and off-balance sheet items.

 

Under current guidelines, the minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets (which are primarily the credit risk equivalents of balance sheet assets and certain off-balance sheet items such as standby letters of credit) is 8.0%. At least half of total capital must be composed of tier 1 capital, which includes common stockholders’ equity (including retained earnings), less goodwill, other disallowed intangibles, and disallowed deferred tax assets, among other items. The Federal Reserve also has adopted a minimum leverage ratio, requiring tier 1 capital of at least 4.0% of average quarterly total consolidated assets, net of goodwill and certain other intangible assets, for all but the most highly rated bank holding companies. The federal banking agencies have also established risk-based and leverage capital guidelines that FDIC-insured depository institutions are required to meet. These regulations are generally similar to those established by the Federal Reserve for bank holding companies.

 

Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, the federal bank regulatory agencies must take “prompt corrective action” against undercapitalized U.S. depository institutions. U.S. depository institutions are assigned one of five capital categories: “well capitalized,” “adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized” and “critically undercapitalized,” and are subjected to different regulation corresponding to the capital category within which the institution falls. A depository institution is deemed to be “well capitalized” if the banking institution has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or greater, a tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.5% and a leverage ratio of 5.0% or greater, and the institution is not subject to an order, written agreement, capital directive or prompt corrective action directive to meet and maintain a specific level for any capital measure. Under certain circumstances, a well-capitalized, adequately capitalized or undercapitalized institution may be treated as if the institution were in the next lower capital category.

 

Failure to meet capital guidelines could subject the institution to a variety of enforcement remedies by federal bank regulatory agencies, including: termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC, restrictions on certain business activities, and appointment of the FDIC as conservator or receiver. As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Bank was well-capitalized.

 

Total stockholder’s equity was $266.3 million at March 31, 2016, compared with $258.5 million at December 31, 2015, an increase of $7.8 million, or 3.0%. This increase was primarily the result of net income of $6.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016.

 

The following table provides a comparison our leverage and risk-weighted capital ratios as of the dates indicated to the minimum and well-capitalized regulatory standards:

 

				To Be Categorized As
		Minimum Required		Well Capitalized Under
		For Capital		Prompt Corrective
		Adequacy Purposes		Action Provisions		Actual Ratio
ALLEGIANCE BANCSHARES, INC.
(Consolidated)
As of March 31, 2016
Common equity Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets)		4.50%		N/A		11.57%
Leverage ratio (to average assets)		4.00%		N/A		10.92%
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio (to risk weighted assets)		6.00%		N/A		12.04%
Total risk-based capital ratio (to risk weighted assets)		8.00%		N/A		12.76%
As of December 31, 2015
Common equity Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets)		N/A		N/A		11.72%
Leverage ratio (to average assets)		4.00%		N/A		11.02%
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio (to risk weighted assets)		4.00%		N/A		12.21%
Total risk-based capital ratio (to risk weighted assets)		8.00%		N/A		12.92%

 

				To Be Categorized As
		Minimum Required		Well Capitalized Under
		For Capital		Prompt Corrective
		Adequacy Purposes		Action Provisions		Actual Ratio
ALLEGIANCE BANK:
As of March 31, 2016
Common equity Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets)		4.50%		6.50%		11.09%
Leverage ratio (to average assets)		4.00%		5.00%		10.06%
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio (to risk weighted assets)		6.00%		8.00%		11.09%
Total risk-based capital ratio (to risk weighted assets)		8.00%		10.00%		11.81%
As of December 31, 2015
Common equity Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets)		N/A		N/A		11.25%
Leverage ratio (to average assets)		4.00%		5.00%		10.16%
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio (to risk weighted assets)		4.00%		6.00%		11.25%
Total risk-based capital ratio (to risk weighted assets)		8.00%		10.00%		11.96%

 

ITEM  3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

Asset/Liability Management and Interest Rate Risk

 

Our asset liability and interest rate risk policy provides management with the guidelines for effective balance sheet management. We have established a measurement system for monitoring our net interest rate sensitivity position. We manage our sensitivity position within our established guidelines.

 

As a financial institution, a component of the market risk that we face is interest rate volatility. Fluctuations in interest rates will ultimately impact both the level of income and expense recorded on most of our assets and liabilities, and the market value of all interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, other than those which have a short term to maturity. Interest rate risk is the potential for economic losses due to future interest rate changes. These economic losses can be reflected as a loss of future net interest income and/or a loss of current fair market values. The objective is to measure the effect on net interest income and to adjust the balance sheet to minimize the inherent risk while at the same time maximizing income.

 

We have not entered into instruments such as leveraged derivatives, interest rate swaps, financial options, financial future contracts or forward delivery contracts for the purpose of reducing interest rate risk. Based upon the nature of our operations, we are not subject to foreign exchange rate or commodity price risk. We do not own any trading assets. We manage our exposure to interest rates by structuring our balance sheet in the ordinary course of a community banking business.

 

Our exposure to interest rate risk is managed by our Asset Liability Committee (“ALCO”), which is composed of certain members of our board of directors and Bank management, in accordance with policies approved by our board of directors. The ALCO formulates strategies based on appropriate levels of interest rate risk. In determining the appropriate level of interest rate risk, the ALCO considers the impact on earnings and capital of the current outlook on interest rates, potential changes in interest rates, regional economies, liquidity, business strategies and other factors. The ALCO meets regularly to review, among other things, the sensitivity of assets and liabilities to interest rate changes, the book and market values of assets and liabilities, unrealized gains and losses, purchase and sale activities, commitments to originate loans and the maturities of investments and borrowings. Additionally, the ALCO reviews liquidity, cash flow flexibility, maturities of deposits, and consumer and commercial deposit activity.

 

We use an interest rate risk simulation model and shock analysis to test the interest rate sensitivity of net interest income and the balance sheet, respectively. All instruments on the balance sheet are modeled at the instrument level, incorporating all relevant attributes such as next reset date, reset frequency, and call dates, as well as prepayment assumptions for loans and securities, and decay rates for nonmaturity deposits. Assumptions based on past experience are incorporated into the model for nonmaturity deposit account decay rates. The assumptions used are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the model cannot precisely measure future net interest income or precisely predict the impact of fluctuations in market interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from the model’s simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and the application and timing of various management strategies.

 

We utilize static balance sheet rate shocks to estimate the potential impact on net interest income of changes in interest rates under various rate scenarios. This analysis estimates a percentage of change in the metric from the stable rate base scenario versus alternative scenarios of rising and falling market interest rates by instantaneously shocking a static balance sheet.

 

The following table summarizes the simulated change in net interest income and the economic value of equity over a 12-month horizon as of the dates indicated:

 

Change in Interest		Percent Change in Net Interest Income				Percent Change in Economic Value of Equity
Rates (Basis Points)		As of March 31, 2016		As of December 31, 2015		As of March 31, 2016		As of December 31, 2015
+300		5.8%		5.2%		3.5%		(0.4)%
+200		3.5%		3.0%		2.7%		(0.1)%
+100		1.3%		1.0%		1.5%		0.0%
Base		0.0%		0.0%		0.0%		0.0%
-100		1.9%		1.5%		(2.5)%		(0.6)%

 

These results are primarily due to behavior of demand, money market and savings deposits during such rate fluctuations. We have found that, historically, interest rates on these deposits change more slowly than changes in the discount and federal funds rates.

 

ITEM  4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management was required to apply judgment in evaluating its controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. See Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 for the Certification statements issued by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.

 

Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM  1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

From time to time, we are subject to claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, we are not party to any legal proceedings the resolution of which we believe would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, liquidity, results of operation, cash flows or capital levels. However, one or more unfavorable outcomes in any claim or litigation against us could have a material adverse effect for the period in which such claim or litigation is resolved. In addition, regardless of their merits or their ultimate outcomes, such matters are costly, divert management’s attention and may materially adversely affect our reputation, even if resolved in our favor. We intend to defend ourself vigorously against any future claims or litigation.

 

ITEM  1A. RISK FACTORS

 

In evaluating an investment in any of the Company’s securities, investors should consider carefully, among other things, information under the heading “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in this Form 10-Q, the risk factors previously disclosed under the heading “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, and such other risk factors as the Company may disclose or has disclosed in other reports and statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

ITEM  2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

 

(a) None.

 

(b) None.

 

(c) None.

 

ITEM  3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

 

None.

 

ITEM  4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM  5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

 

ITEM  6.    EXHIBITS

 

Exhibit Number	Description
3.1	Amended and Restated Certificate of Formation of Allegiance Bancshares, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-206536) (the “Registration Statement”))
3.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws of Allegiance Bancshares, Inc.  (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registration Statement)
4.1	Specimen Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement)
10.1*	Amendment to Employment and Non-Competition Agreement by and between William C. Woodby and Allegiance Bank (successor to Enterprise Bank) dated July 28, 2014
10.2*	Amendment to Employment and Non-Competition Agreement by and between James F. Eubank II and Allegiance Bank (successor to Enterprise Bank) dated July 28, 2014
31.1*	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
31.2*	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
32.1**	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2**	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS*	XBRL Instance Document
101. SCH*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document Exhibit
101.CAL*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

 

*

Filed with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

**

Furnished with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

	Allegiance Bancshares, Inc. (Registrant)
Date: May 10, 2016	By: /s/ George Martinez
	George Martinez
	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Date: May 10, 2016	By: /s/ Laurence L. Lehman III
	Laurence L. Lehman III
	Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

55