Filed by Cell Therapeutics, Inc. Pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act of 1933 And deemed filed pursuant Rule 14a-12 Of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Subject Company: Cell Therapeutics, Inc. Commission File No.: 001-12465 |
CTI-Novuspharma Merger
June 17, 2003
|
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
|
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
|
Strategic Rationale
| |||||
Greater revenue growth potential | |||||
TRISENOX® gaining hematology market share | MARKETED | ||||
XYOTAX in pivotal trials for lung cancer | LAUNCH 2005 | ||||
Pixantrone in pivotal trials for NHL | LAUNCH 2006 | ||||
Targeting profitability in 2005 | |||||
Strong combined balance sheet | |||||
$230 million proforma end Q1, 2003 | |||||
Significant cost savings | |||||
$18-$20 million annual operating synergies | |||||
Strengthened oncology drug development expertise | |||||
Global access to patients, physicians and capital markets | |||||
Overview of CTI
| ||||
TRISENOX®: approved in US and EU for APL | ||||
100%CAGR expected through 2004 | ||||
Potential to capture significant share of hematologic malignancy market (MDS, MM) | ||||
$150 million US sales potential | ||||
XYOTAX: safer, potentially more effective paclitaxel in pivotal trials for non-small cell lung and ovarian cancers | ||||
CT-2106 (PG-CPT): safer, potentially more effective camptothecin in phase I | ||||
Balance sheet: ~$111 million cash as of 3/31/03 | ||||
Research coverage | ||||
CIBC World Markets, Lehman Bros., Piper Jaffray, Wells Fargo, Punk Ziegel, Delafield Hambrecht | ||||
Overview of
| ||||
Pixantrone potential best in class safer, more effective anthracycline in pivotal trials for NHL | ||||
Strong balance sheet: ~$120 million cash as of 3/31/03 | ||||
Former oncology drug development arm of Boehringer Mannheim, part of Hoffman La Roche | ||||
Expertise in pre-development, pharmacology, CMC, Phase I-II | ||||
Research coverage: Lehman Bros., SG Cowen, Banca IMI, Caboto | ||||
Timing
| ||||
Unanimous approval of both Boards | ||||
Subject to Novuspharma and CTI shareholder approval | ||||
Subject to approval of CTIs application to list its shares on the Nuovo Mercato | ||||
Merger expected to close Q4 | ||||
Integration plan & team established | ||||
$18-20 million full year of cost savings expected in 2004 | ||||
Year end combined cash position forecasted at $160M | ||||
Specifics of Agreement
| ||||
CTI to issue 16 million shares of CTIC to Novuspharma shareholders | ||||
Fixed exchange ratio 2.45 | ||||
Transaction value ~$235 million | ||||
Dual listing on NASDAQ and Nuovo Mercato | ||||
Novuspharma to have two seats on board with a third independent director to be nominated prior to closing | ||||
Silvano Spinelli, CEO of Novuspharma to join CTIs management team in following roles | ||||
EVP, Development at CTI | ||||
Managing Director, CTIs European subsidiary in Bresso | ||||
Company Profiles
| ||||||||
CTI |
Novuspharma |
|||||||
Therapeutic focus |
|
Cancer |
|
Cancer |
||||
|
|
| ||||||
Key Products |
||||||||
|
|
| ||||||
Marketed |
TRISENOX® |
-- | ||||||
|
|
| ||||||
Phase III |
XYOTAX |
Pixantrone | ||||||
|
|
| ||||||
Phase I/II |
CT-2106 (polyglutamate camptothecin) |
MT-201, BBR3576 | ||||||
|
|
| ||||||
Core competencies |
Sales & Marketing, Phase II/III, Target discovery & validation |
Preclinical (in vivo, PK/PD), CMC (analytical), Phase I-II | ||||||
|
|
| ||||||
Head count |
288 |
85 | ||||||
|
|
| ||||||
Facilities |
170,000 sq ft (Seattle) |
75,000 sq ft (Milan) | ||||||
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
| ||||||
Balance sheet 3/31/03 |
$111 million |
$120 million* | ||||||
*Converted to US dollars; exchange rate 1.18 | ||||||||
Merged Company
| ||||||
Therapeutic focus |
|
Cancer |
||||
|
| |||||
Key Products |
||||||
|
| |||||
Marketed |
TRISENOX® | |||||
|
| |||||
Phase III |
XYOTAX, Pixantrone | |||||
|
| |||||
Phase I/II |
CT-2106, MT-201, BBR3576 | |||||
|
| |||||
Core competencies |
Fully integrated capabilities from target discovery through commercialization | |||||
|
| |||||
Head count |
~320 | |||||
|
| |||||
Facilities |
250,000 sq ft (Seattle-Milan) | |||||
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
Balance sheet (3/31/03) |
~$230 million* | |||||
*Converted to US dollars; exchange rate 1.18 | ||||||
Operating Synergies
| ||||
Center of excellence Milan | ||||
Medicinal chemistry, lead optimization | ||||
Preclinical models, toxicology-ADME, analytical development, pharmacology | ||||
Clinical trials material production | ||||
PK/PD testing in Phase I | ||||
EU pharmacovigilance, QA/QC | ||||
European clinical development | ||||
Operating Synergies
| |||||
Corporate Headquarters Seattle | |||||
Target discovery/validation | |||||
Clinical Development | |||||
Phase I-III | |||||
Drug Regulatory Affairs | |||||
Drug Safety & Surveillance | |||||
Sales & Marketing | |||||
Portfolio Synergies
| ||||||||
Key Products |
|
Hematology |
|
Solid Tumors |
||||
|
|
| ||||||
TRISENOX® |
Leukemia, CML MDS, |
|||||||
|
|
| ||||||
Pixantrone |
Aggressive NHL |
Breast cancer | ||||||
|
|
| ||||||
XYOTAX |
|
NSC Lung cancer | ||||||
|
|
| ||||||
CT-2106 |
|
Colorectal cancer |
||||||
|
|
| ||||||
Pixantrone
| ||||
Long lasting complete/partial responses in heavily treated NHL patients as single agent | ||||
Synergistic with combination therapy (Rituxan®) | ||||
Cardiac toxicity profile superior to existing agents | ||||
Convenience of eliminating central line | ||||
Reduces need for expensive anti-emetics | ||||
Initial market entry into area of high unmet need | ||||
Pixantrone
| |||||
Extensive experience in >170 patients | |||||
7 phase I, II trials | |||||
Highly active in combination regimens for relapsed/refractory NHL replacing doxorubicin | |||||
CHOP n=17 | |||||
13 patients evaluable; 6CRs/1PR | |||||
ESHAP n=21 | |||||
19 pts evaluable; 7CRs/4PRs | |||||
Highly active in relapsed/refractory indolent NHL | |||||
FND-R n=9 | |||||
6 patients evaluable; 5CRs/1PR | |||||
Pixantrone
| ||||||||||||||||
Patient |
|
NHL |
Status |
Prior Rx |
Resistant |
Respnse |
|
Duration |
||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
M-80 |
DLC |
1st Rel |
Dx380 |
Yes |
uPR(650) |
NA | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
F-79 |
DLC |
2nd Rel |
Dx400 |
Yes |
CR(1530) |
17 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
F-65 |
DLC |
2nd Rel |
Dx400 |
Yes |
CR(1530) |
4 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
M-65 |
DLC |
3rd Rel |
Dx250 |
No |
uPR(1190) |
NA | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
M-72 |
DLC |
3rd Rel |
Dx400 |
No |
PR(1530) |
6.5 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
M-66 |
tFoll |
5th Rel |
Dx240/ |
No |
PR(1360) |
17+ | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
F-65 |
Mant |
2nd Rel |
Dx300 |
Yes |
CR(1060) |
12.5 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
M-65 |
DLC |
2nd Rel |
Dx300 |
No |
uPR(1020) |
NA | ||||||||||
Pixantrone
| ||||||||||||||||
Patient |
|
NHL |
Status |
Prior Rx |
Resistant |
Response |
|
Duration |
||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
F-72 |
DLC |
4th Rel |
Dx300 |
Yes |
PR(1020) |
5 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
F-41 |
Mcy |
3rd Rel |
Dx300 |
No |
CR(1241) |
7 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
F-60 |
DLC |
3rd Rel |
Dx400 |
Yes |
PR(1020) |
NA | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
M-78 |
Mant |
2nd Rel |
None |
Yes |
uPR(1020) |
NA | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
F-55 |
DLC |
1st Rel |
Dx300 |
No |
CR(1326) |
12 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
M-66 |
DLC |
2nd Rel |
Dx |
Yes |
uPR(425) |
1 | ||||||||||
Pixantrone
| ||||
High response rates in relapsed/resistant aggressive NHL | ||||
ORR= >30% (7CRs/5PRs + 5uPRs) | ||||
Durable responses: TTP >8 months for responders | ||||
Well tolerated | ||||
Grade 4 neutropenia 13/33 (40%) | ||||
Grade 4 anemia/thrombocytopenia 0-1/33 (<3%) | ||||
28/33 (85%) had maximum prior anthracycline exposure | ||||
14/33 (42%) received >1,000-1500mg/m2 Pixantrone | ||||
Encouraging low incidence of cardiac events despite prior anthracycline exposure | ||||
Pixantrone
| ||||
New strategy for registration in U.S. | ||||
Pivotal trial in 3rd line aggressive NHL | ||||
Compelling phase II clinical data | ||||
High unmet needqualifies for fast track | ||||
No approved agentsnon-randomized single open label trial ~120 pts |
||||
Enrollment completion late 2004 | ||||
NDA target Q4 2005 | ||||
Potential launch 2006 | ||||
Phase III in relapsed indolent NHL ± rituximab to provide market penetration support |
||||
Pixantrone
| |||||
Anthracyclines | |||||
Standard of care | |||||
Front line and relapsed aggressive NHL (CHOP) | |||||
Front line for acute myeloid leukemias | |||||
Front line breast cancer, relapsed HR prostate cancer | |||||
$500+ million in annual sales | |||||
Market leaders | |||||
Doxorubicin (US) | |||||
Epirubicin (EU) | |||||
Major limitationlife time cardiac toxicity threshold |
|||||
Pixantrone
| ||||
If approved in 3rd line aggressive NHL | ||||
100% would use it in 2nd & 3rd line | ||||
50% would replace doxorubicin in 1st line for aggressive especially high cardiac risk patients | ||||
>50% would use it in 2nd and 3rd line indolent | ||||
Zevalin and Bexxar® would be used after Pixantrone due to difficulty with nuclear medicine scheduling issues | ||||
With supportive data in clinical trials could move into breast and prostate cancers | ||||
Base case forecast $150 million peak U.S. sales | ||||
TRISENOX®
| ||||
Product approved U.S. and EU | ||||
100% CAGR forecasted through 2003 | ||||
$150+ million peak U.S. sales potential | ||||
Compelling efficacy in hematologic cancers (APL, MM, MDS) | ||||
Gaining US market share | ||||
EU penetration limited to initial label (APL) | ||||
Potential for MDS filing in 2004 allows for re-evaluation of EU commercial potential and strategy |
||||
TRISENOX®
| ||||
Myelodysplasia (120 patients) | ||||
Decreases or eliminates RBC and platelet transfusion independence | ||||
80% of responding patients became transfusion independent lasting up to 2 yrs | ||||
32% objective responses including high risk patients | ||||
Well tolerated, no dose reductions required | ||||
Projected sNDA and sMAA filing in both EU and US in 2004 | ||||
Multiple myeloma (86 patients) | ||||
High response rates in combination with vitamin C | ||||
40% objective responses | ||||
100% improvement in kidney function | ||||
Well tolerated, manageable side effects | ||||
Reported at conferences in May, 2003 | ||||
TRISENOX®
| ||
|
||
|
||
XYOTAX
| ||||
Novel, patented polyglutamate polymer technology links paclitaxel to a digestible polymer |
||||
Polymer bound paclitaxel accumulates preferentially in tumor blood vessels |
||||
Allows the chemotherapy to enter cancer cells through a different mechanism than standard paclitaxel |
||||
Selectively releases chemotherapy in tumor | ||||
A new chemical entity; not a reformulation | ||||
Patent protection through 2017 | ||||
XYOTAX
| |||||
|
|
|
|||
Premedications | |
|
|
||
Special Infusion kits | |
|
|
||
Infusion time | |
|
|
||
Hair Loss | |
|
|
||
Lung Toxicity | |
|
|
||
Neuropathy | |
|
|
||
Tolerability | |
|
|
||
Efficacy | Superior | | | ||
XYOTAX
| ||||
Designated fast track by FDA | ||||
PS2 NSC lung cancer is incurable and current treatments offer modest benefit | ||||
XYOTAX has the potential to demonstrate improvement over available therapy in these patients based on anti-tumor activity reported in phase I and phase II clinical trials | ||||
FDA approved Phase III program in NSC lung cancer to demonstrate superior survival | ||||
Front line therapy in PS2 | ||||
Second line treatment | ||||
Gynecologic Oncology Group to run phase III in ovarian cancer |
||||
Front line therapy | ||||
Phase II XYOTAX
| ||||
PS2 accounts for 25% of 170,000 patients with NSC lung cancer (most are elderly) |
||||
Current treatments are poorly tolerated (median 2 doses) | ||||
Disease progresses rapidly | ||||
Median 6 weeks | ||||
Median survival poor (2.4 3.9 months)* | ||||
High unmet needpotential accelerated regulatory review | ||||
Phase II XYOTAX clinical data supports phase III investigation | ||||
Principle investigators on Phase III program are key opinion leaders of major cooperative groups (CALGB, ECOG, SWOG) | ||||
*Single agent v. combination therapy respectively | ||||
Phase II XYOTAX
| ||||||||||||
Efficacy (PS2) |
Response Rate |
Median # of Doses |
Progression (months) |
Survival (months) |
||||||||
XYOTAX |
|
~10% |
4 |
2.6 |
|
³5.4 |
||||||
Toxicities (Grade 3 / 4) | ||||||||||||
Highest (Grade 4) | 10% | |||||||||||
Neutropenia | 4% | |||||||||||
Neuropathy/Fatigue | 7% | |||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Paclitaxel |
~10% |
2 |
1.5 |
2.4 |
||||||||
Toxicities (Grade 3 / 4)*** | ||||||||||||
Highest (Grade 4) | 53% | |||||||||||
Neutropenia | 63% | |||||||||||
Neuropathy/Fatigue | >10% | |||||||||||
*ASCO 2003 poster ** ASCO 2002 presentation, R.C. Lilenbaum *** Paclitaxel/carboplatin regimen, NEJM Vol 346, No. 2, June 10, 2002 |
||||||||||||
STELLAR 2-3-4 trials
| |||||||||
STELLAR 2 | STELLAR 4 | ||||||||
Second line therapy | Front line PS2 XYOTAX v. | ||||||||
XYOTAX v. docetaxel | gemcitabine or vinorelbine | ||||||||
840 patients | 370 patients | ||||||||
Target enrollment- end Q2-2004 |
Target enrollment- end Q1-2004 |
||||||||
STELLAR 3 | |||||||||
Front line PS2 XYOTAX/platinum v. paclitaxel/platinum |
ENDPOINTS on all trials Superior Survival |
||||||||
370 patients | |||||||||
Target enrollment- end Q4-2003 |
|||||||||
XYOTAX for Ovarian Cancer
| ||||
XYOTAX (175mg/m2) (n=91, Salvage^) | ||||
|
|
|||
|
||||
CR/PR | |
|
||
SD | |
|
||
XYOTAX* + cisplatin (75mg/m2) (n=12) | *175,210,225,250 mg/m2 ^ patients with 2 prior regimens Results reported at 2002 EORTC Meeting |
|||
Platinum Sensitive/ Resistant |
||||
|
||||
PR | |
|||
SD | |
|||
Phase II XYOTAX
| ||||||
XYOTAX*** |
Taxol®* |
Doxil®** |
Topotecan** |
|||
|
||||||
Efficacy | 28% |
15% |
28% |
28% |
||
Response rate | |
|
|
|
||
Side Effects | |
|
|
|
||
Neutropenia | 2% |
65% |
12% |
77% |
||
Neuropathy | 10% |
21% |
N/A |
N/A |
||
Skin toxicity | 0% |
0% |
23% |
0% |
||
Hair loss | 0% |
87% |
16% |
49% |
||
Dose reduction | 1% |
N/A |
57% |
78% |
||
* Taxol® package insert, 2nd line data ovarian cancer, 3hr infusion ** J Clin Oncology 2001, Randomized trial Doxil® v. Topotecan in 2nd line ovarian cancer *** Third-line treatment |
XYOTAX Phase III Ovarian Cancer
| ||||
Front Line Ovarian Cancer | ||||
XYOTAX/platinum v. paclitaxel/platinum | ||||
Conducted by 200+ GOG centers in US | ||||
1200 patients (12 months enrollment) | ||||
Start late 2004 | ||||
Endpoint: non inferior PFS, Superior side effect profile | ||||
Why Novuspharma?
| ||||
Economically superior | ||||
$120M in cash | ||||
$18M-$20M in cost savings | ||||
Contributes additional phase III $150M+ product | ||||
Critical mass in global oncology drug development | ||||
Increases commercial capabilities in EU for expanded TRISENOX® label and sales potential | ||||
FDAs XYOTAX fast track designation significant validating value driver | ||||
Retention of WW (excluding Asia) rights critical among the potential multi-national pharma companies | ||||
Allows the Company to re-evaluate prior interest in focusing solely on ex-US partner for XYOTAX and turn attention to more global strategic relationship | ||||
Portfolio Synergies
| |||||
TRISENOX® | |||||
EU sales driven by product label indications | |||||
Potential MDS label expansion makes ex-US commercial prospect attractive | |||||
Expanded label has attracted interest among several pharma companies for co-promotional relationship | |||||
Investment in EU commercial presence would maximize WW revenue potential | |||||
XYOTAX | |||||
Stronger EU presence to allow more efficient pivotal trial management | |||||
35-40% of phase III enrollment in the EU | |||||
Transaction allows CTI to retain WW rights and explore growing interest for potential global partnership | |||||
Portfolio Synergies
| ||||
Pixantrone | ||||
Strong US hematology presence will facilitate clinical and regulatory development | ||||
Same customer base as TRISENOX® provides sales and marketing efficiencies | ||||
CT-2106 | ||||
Enhances access to clinical sites in EU to expedite phase II trials | ||||
Provides cost synergies for required preclinical, manufacturing activites | ||||
Preclinical targets | ||||
HIF-1a and LPAAT promising novel targets | ||||
Remaining product programs with greatest commercial potential will be reviewed and prioritized | ||||