UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 27, 2017
OR
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 000-50972
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
20-1083890 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(IRS Employer |
incorporation or organization) |
|
Identification Number) |
6040 Dutchmans Lane, Suite 200
Louisville, Kentucky 40205
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(502) 426-9984
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer ☒ |
Accelerated filer ☐ |
Non-accelerated filer ☐ |
Smaller reporting company ☐ |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Emerging growth company ☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒.
The number of shares of common stock outstanding were 71,031,612 on July 26, 2017.
2
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Texas Roadhouse, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
June 27, 2017 |
|
December 27, 2016 |
|
||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
116,508 |
|
$ |
112,944 |
|
Receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $52 at June 27, 2017 and $33 at December 27, 2016 |
|
|
29,295 |
|
|
56,127 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
15,439 |
|
|
16,088 |
|
Prepaid income taxes |
|
|
— |
|
|
954 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
11,170 |
|
|
12,150 |
|
Deferred tax assets, net |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,996 |
|
Total current assets |
|
|
172,412 |
|
|
200,259 |
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $493,506 at June 27, 2017 and $457,102 at December 27, 2016 |
|
|
868,668 |
|
|
830,054 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
121,040 |
|
|
116,571 |
|
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $12,214 at June 27, 2017 and $11,753 at December 27, 2016 |
|
|
3,161 |
|
|
3,622 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
34,000 |
|
|
29,465 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,199,281 |
|
$ |
1,179,971 |
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt and obligation under capital lease |
|
$ |
176 |
|
$ |
167 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
52,061 |
|
|
50,789 |
|
Deferred revenue-gift cards |
|
|
78,779 |
|
|
129,558 |
|
Accrued wages |
|
|
29,121 |
|
|
26,039 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
6,300 |
|
|
— |
|
Accrued taxes and licenses |
|
|
20,906 |
|
|
19,698 |
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
14,915 |
|
|
13,418 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
43,950 |
|
|
39,858 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
246,208 |
|
|
279,527 |
|
Long-term debt and obligation under capital lease, excluding current maturities |
|
|
52,291 |
|
|
52,381 |
|
Stock option and other deposits |
|
|
7,976 |
|
|
7,491 |
|
Deferred rent |
|
|
38,945 |
|
|
36,103 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities, net |
|
|
6,520 |
|
|
12,268 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
37,920 |
|
|
33,959 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
389,860 |
|
|
421,729 |
|
Texas Roadhouse, Inc. and subsidiaries stockholders’ equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock ($0.001 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding) |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Common stock ($0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 71,027,174 and 70,619,737 shares issued and outstanding at June 27, 2017 and December 27, 2016, respectively) |
|
|
71 |
|
|
71 |
|
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
224,725 |
|
|
219,626 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
572,743 |
|
|
530,723 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(151) |
|
|
(194) |
|
Total Texas Roadhouse, Inc. and subsidiaries stockholders’ equity |
|
|
797,388 |
|
|
750,226 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
12,033 |
|
|
8,016 |
|
Total equity |
|
|
809,421 |
|
|
758,242 |
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
1,199,281 |
|
$ |
1,179,971 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Texas Roadhouse, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 Weeks Ended |
|
26 Weeks Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
June 27, 2017 |
|
June 28, 2016 |
|
June 27, 2017 |
|
June 28, 2016 |
|
||||
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restaurant sales |
|
$ |
562,160 |
|
$ |
504,630 |
|
$ |
1,125,480 |
|
$ |
1,015,914 |
|
Franchise royalties and fees |
|
|
4,102 |
|
|
4,178 |
|
|
8,468 |
|
|
8,453 |
|
Total revenue |
|
|
566,262 |
|
|
508,808 |
|
|
1,133,948 |
|
|
1,024,367 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restaurant operating costs (excluding depreciation and amortization shown separately below): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
185,171 |
|
|
171,551 |
|
|
369,364 |
|
|
344,679 |
|
Labor |
|
|
174,585 |
|
|
150,014 |
|
|
344,932 |
|
|
297,560 |
|
Rent |
|
|
11,112 |
|
|
10,184 |
|
|
21,981 |
|
|
20,211 |
|
Other operating |
|
|
84,837 |
|
|
75,887 |
|
|
170,497 |
|
|
153,499 |
|
Pre-opening |
|
|
5,014 |
|
|
4,411 |
|
|
9,754 |
|
|
9,236 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
23,106 |
|
|
20,238 |
|
|
45,702 |
|
|
39,777 |
|
Impairment and closure |
|
|
— |
|
|
30 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
41 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
28,223 |
|
|
26,711 |
|
|
68,471 |
|
|
56,771 |
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
512,048 |
|
|
459,026 |
|
|
1,030,712 |
|
|
921,774 |
|
Income from operations |
|
|
54,214 |
|
|
49,782 |
|
|
103,236 |
|
|
102,593 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
379 |
|
|
309 |
|
|
711 |
|
|
614 |
|
Equity income from investments in unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(470) |
|
|
(475) |
|
|
(790) |
|
|
(827) |
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
54,305 |
|
|
49,948 |
|
$ |
103,315 |
|
$ |
102,806 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
15,126 |
|
|
15,087 |
|
|
28,113 |
|
|
30,944 |
|
Net income including noncontrolling interests |
|
|
39,179 |
|
|
34,861 |
|
$ |
75,202 |
|
$ |
71,862 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
1,598 |
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
3,308 |
|
|
2,664 |
|
Net income attributable to Texas Roadhouse, Inc. and subsidiaries |
|
$ |
37,581 |
|
$ |
33,605 |
|
$ |
71,894 |
|
$ |
69,198 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivatives, net of tax of ($-), ($-), ($-) and ($18), respectively |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
27 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax of ($14), $20, ($27) and $26, respectively |
|
|
22 |
|
|
(29) |
|
|
43 |
|
|
(40) |
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
|
22 |
|
|
(29) |
|
|
43 |
|
|
(13) |
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
37,603 |
|
$ |
33,576 |
|
$ |
71,937 |
|
$ |
69,185 |
|
Net income per common share attributable to Texas Roadhouse, Inc. and subsidiaries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
$ |
1.01 |
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
$ |
1.01 |
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
70,973 |
|
|
70,368 |
|
|
70,876 |
|
|
70,269 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
71,437 |
|
|
70,876 |
|
|
71,398 |
|
|
70,840 |
|
Cash dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Texas Roadhouse, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
Total Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
Roadhouse, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Par |
|
Paid-in- |
|
Retained |
|
Comprehensive |
|
and |
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Shares |
|
Value |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Loss |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Interests |
|
Total |
|
|||||||
Balance, December 27, 2016 |
|
70,619,737 |
|
$ |
71 |
|
$ |
219,626 |
|
$ |
530,723 |
|
$ |
(194) |
|
$ |
750,226 |
|
$ |
8,016 |
|
$ |
758,242 |
|
Net income |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
71,894 |
|
|
— |
|
|
71,894 |
|
|
3,308 |
|
|
75,202 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
43 |
|
|
43 |
|
|
— |
|
|
43 |
|
Noncontrolling interests contribution |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
3,457 |
|
|
3,457 |
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interest holders |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(2,748) |
|
|
(2,748) |
|
Dividends declared and paid ($0.21 per share) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(14,890) |
|
|
— |
|
|
(14,890) |
|
|
— |
|
|
(14,890) |
|
Dividends declared ($0.21 per share) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(14,915) |
|
|
— |
|
|
(14,915) |
|
|
— |
|
|
(14,915) |
|
Shares issued under share-based compensation plans |
|
597,172 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1,290 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,291 |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,291 |
|
Indirect repurchase of shares for minimum tax withholdings |
|
(189,735) |
|
|
(1) |
|
|
(8,625) |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(8,626) |
|
|
— |
|
|
(8,626) |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
69 |
|
|
(69) |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
12,365 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
12,365 |
|
|
— |
|
|
12,365 |
|
Balance, June 27, 2017 |
|
71,027,174 |
|
$ |
71 |
|
$ |
224,725 |
|
$ |
572,743 |
|
$ |
(151) |
|
$ |
797,388 |
|
$ |
12,033 |
|
$ |
809,421 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Texas Roadhouse, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
26 Weeks Ended |
|
||||
|
|
June 27, 2017 |
|
June 28, 2016 |
|
||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income including noncontrolling interests |
|
$ |
75,202 |
|
$ |
71,862 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
45,702 |
|
|
39,777 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(3,780) |
|
|
(3,395) |
|
Loss on disposition of assets |
|
|
2,339 |
|
|
2,696 |
|
Equity income from investments in unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(790) |
|
|
(827) |
|
Distributions of income received from investments in unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
370 |
|
|
998 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
19 |
|
|
35 |
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
12,365 |
|
|
11,703 |
|
Changes in operating working capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
26,814 |
|
|
24,285 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
819 |
|
|
1,190 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
980 |
|
|
1,427 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(4,046) |
|
|
(1,915) |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(744) |
|
|
(4,705) |
|
Deferred revenue—gift cards |
|
|
(51,170) |
|
|
(39,499) |
|
Accrued wages |
|
|
3,083 |
|
|
(10,089) |
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
|
|
— |
|
|
(2,193) |
|
Prepaid income taxes and income taxes payable |
|
|
7,254 |
|
|
10,941 |
|
Accrued taxes and licenses |
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
276 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
5,883 |
|
|
6,074 |
|
Deferred rent |
|
|
2,842 |
|
|
2,220 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
3,958 |
|
|
3,207 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
128,308 |
|
|
114,068 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures—property and equipment |
|
|
(73,637) |
|
|
(69,159) |
|
Acquisition of franchise restaurants, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(16,528) |
|
|
— |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(90,165) |
|
|
(69,159) |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from revolving credit facility, net |
|
|
— |
|
|
25,000 |
|
Proceeds from noncontrolling interest contribution |
|
|
3,457 |
|
|
— |
|
Repurchase of shares of common stock |
|
|
— |
|
|
(4,110) |
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interest holders |
|
|
(2,748) |
|
|
(2,487) |
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
|
|
— |
|
|
2,193 |
|
Proceeds from stock option and other deposits, net |
|
|
436 |
|
|
285 |
|
Indirect repurchase of shares for minimum tax withholdings |
|
|
(8,626) |
|
|
(6,337) |
|
Principal payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligation |
|
|
(81) |
|
|
(71) |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
1,291 |
|
|
1,866 |
|
Dividends paid to shareholders |
|
|
(28,308) |
|
|
(25,277) |
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(34,579) |
|
|
(8,938) |
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
3,564 |
|
|
35,971 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents—beginning of period |
|
|
112,944 |
|
|
59,334 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents—end of period |
|
$ |
116,508 |
|
$ |
95,305 |
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized |
|
$ |
588 |
|
$ |
499 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
24,638 |
|
$ |
23,398 |
|
Capital expenditures included in current liabilities |
|
$ |
6,110 |
|
$ |
3,710 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Texas Roadhouse, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
(1) Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Texas Roadhouse, Inc. ("TRI"), our wholly-owned subsidiaries and subsidiaries in which we have a controlling interest (collectively the "Company," "we," "our" and/or "us") as of June 27, 2017 and December 27, 2016 and for the 13 and 26 weeks ended June 27, 2017 and June 28, 2016.
As of June 27, 2017, we owned and operated 448 restaurants and franchised an additional 84 restaurants in 49 states and six foreign countries. Of the 448 company-owned restaurants that were operating at June 27, 2017, 430 were wholly-owned and 18 were majority-owned.
As of June 28, 2016, we owned and operated 415 restaurants and franchised an additional 84 restaurants in 49 states and five foreign countries. Of the 415 company-owned restaurants that were operating at June 28, 2016, 399 were wholly-owned and 16 were majority-owned.
As of June 27, 2017 and June 28, 2016, we owned 5.0% to 10.0% equity interest in 24 franchise restaurants. Additionally, as of June 27, 2017 and June 28, 2016, we owned a 40% equity interest in four non-Texas Roadhouse restaurants as part of a joint venture agreement with a casual dining restaurant operator in China. The unconsolidated restaurants are accounted for using the equity method. Our investments in these unconsolidated affiliates are included in Other assets in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets, and we record our percentage share of net income earned by these unconsolidated affiliates in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income under Equity income from investments in unconsolidated affiliates. All significant intercompany balances and transactions for these unconsolidated restaurants as well as the entities whose accounts have been consolidated have been eliminated.
We have made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the reporting of revenue and expenses during the periods to prepare these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the carrying amount of property and equipment, goodwill, obligations related to insurance reserves, leases and leasehold improvements, legal reserves, gift card discounts and breakage and income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP, except that certain information and footnotes have been condensed or omitted pursuant to rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Operating results for the 13 and 26 weeks ended June 27, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 26, 2017. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2016.
Our significant interim accounting policies include the recognition of income taxes using an estimated annual effective tax rate.
(2) Share-based Compensation
On May 16, 2013, our stockholders approved the Texas Roadhouse, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "Plan"). The Plan provides for the granting of incentive and non-qualified stock options to purchase shares of common
7
stock, stock appreciation rights, and full value awards, including restricted stock, restricted stock units ("RSUs"), deferred stock units, performance stock and performance stock units ("PSUs"). This Plan replaced the Texas Roadhouse, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Plan.
The following table summarizes the share-based compensation expense recorded in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 Weeks Ended |
|
26 Weeks Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
June 27, 2017 |
|
June 28, 2016 |
|
June 27, 2017 |
|
June 28, 2016 |
|
||||
Labor expense |
|
$ |
1,739 |
|
$ |
1,507 |
|
$ |
3,433 |
|
$ |
2,906 |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
4,408 |
|
|
4,408 |
|
|
8,932 |
|
|
8,797 |
|
Total share-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
6,147 |
|
$ |
5,915 |
|
$ |
12,365 |
|
$ |
11,703 |
|
Effective December 28, 2016, we adopted Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation ("ASU 2016-09") which amends and simplifies the accounting for stock compensation. As a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-09, we made a change in our accounting for forfeitures to record as they occur and, as a result, we recorded a $0.1 million cumulative-effect reduction to retained earnings under the modified retrospective approach. We elected the prospective transition for the requirement to classify excess tax benefits as an operating activity. No prior periods have been adjusted. Additionally, as a result of the new guidance requirements, on a prospective basis, all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies are recognized within the income tax provision in the income statement in the period in which the restricted shares vest or options are exercised. See note 4 for further discussion.
Beginning in 2008, we changed the method by which we provide share-based compensation to our employees by granting RSUs as a form of share-based compensation. Prior to 2008, we issued stock options as share-based compensation to our employees. Beginning in 2015, we began granting PSUs to two of our executives. An RSU is the conditional right to receive one share of common stock upon satisfaction of the vesting requirement. A PSU is the conditional right to receive one share of common stock upon meeting defined performance obligations along with the satisfaction of the vesting requirement. Share-based compensation activity by type of grant as of June 27, 2017 and changes during the 26 weeks then ended are presented below.
Summary Details for RSUs
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair |
|
Remaining Contractual |
|
Aggregate |
|
||
|
|
Shares |
|
Value |
|
Term (years) |
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
||
Outstanding at December 27, 2016 |
|
919,463 |
|
$ |
37.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
239,416 |
|
|
46.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
(27,870) |
|
|
37.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
(316,078) |
|
|
37.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 27, 2017 |
|
814,931 |
|
$ |
39.55 |
|
1.2 |
|
$ |
41,588 |
|
As of June 27, 2017, with respect to unvested RSUs, there was $17.9 million of unrecognized compensation cost that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.2 years. The vesting terms of the RSUs range from approximately 1.0 to 5.0 years. The total intrinsic value of RSUs vested during the 26 weeks ended June 27, 2017 and June 28, 2016 was $14.6 million and $13.0 million, respectively. The excess tax benefit, which was recognized within the income tax provision, associated with vested RSUs was $1.0 million for the 26 weeks ended June 27, 2017. The excess tax benefit associated with vested RSUs for the 26 weeks ended June 28, 2016 was $0.9 million which was recorded in additional paid-in-capital in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets.
8
Summary Details for PSUs
In 2015 and 2016, we granted PSUs to two of our executives subject to an approximate one-year vesting term and the achievement of certain earnings targets, which determine the number of units to vest at the end of the vesting period. Share-based compensation is recognized for the number of units expected to vest at the end of the period and is expensed beginning on the grant date and through the performance period. For each grant, PSUs vest after meeting the performance and service conditions.
On November 19, 2015, we granted PSUs with a grant date fair value of approximately $3.9 million based on the grant date price per share of $34.11. On January 8, 2017, 188,237 shares vested related to this PSU grant and were distributed during the 13 weeks ended March 28, 2017. On November 9, 2016, we granted PSUs with a grant date fair value of $4.6 million based on a grant date price per share of $39.88. As of June 27, 2017, with respect to unvested PSUs, there was $2.1 million of unrecognized compensation cost that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of six months. Any distribution of vested PSUs as common stock related to the November 9, 2016 grants will occur in the first quarter of 2018. For the 26 weeks ended June 27, 2017, the excess tax benefit, recognized within the income tax provision, associated with vested PSUs was $0.8 million.
Summary Details for Stock Options
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Exercise |
|
Remaining Contractual |
|
Aggregate |
|
||
|
|
Shares |
|
Price |
|
Term (years) |
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
||
Outstanding at December 27, 2016 |
|
118,073 |
|
$ |
13.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/Expired |
|
(2,650) |
|
|
15.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
(92,857) |
|
|
13.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 27, 2017 |
|
22,566 |
|
$ |
11.91 |
|
0.3 |
|
$ |
882 |
|
Exercisable at June 27, 2017 |
|
22,566 |
|
$ |
11.91 |
|
0.3 |
|
$ |
882 |
|
No stock options vested during the 26 weeks ended June 27, 2017 or June 28, 2016. For the 26 weeks ended June 27, 2017 and June 28, 2016, the total intrinsic value of options exercised was $3.1 million and $4.6 million, respectively.
For the 26 weeks ended June 27, 2017 and June 28, 2016, cash received before tax withholdings from options exercised was $1.3 million and $1.9 million, respectively. The excess tax benefit, recognized within the income tax provision, associated with options exercised was $0.8 million for the 26 weeks ended June 27, 2017. The excess tax benefit for the 26 weeks ended June 28, 2016 was $1.3 million which was recorded in additional paid-in-capital in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets.
(3) Long-term Debt and Obligation Under Capital Lease
Long-term debt consisted of the following:
|
|
June 27, |
|
December 27, |
|
||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||
Installment loan, due 2020 |
|
$ |
472 |
|
$ |
550 |
|
Obligation under capital lease |
|
|
1,995 |
|
|
1,998 |
|
Revolver |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
52,467 |
|
|
52,548 |
|
Less current maturities |
|
|
176 |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
$ |
52,291 |
|
$ |
52,381 |
|
The interest rate for our installment loan outstanding at both June 27, 2017 and December 27, 2016 was 10.46%. The debt is secured by certain land and building assets and is subject to certain prepayment penalties.
9
During the 52 weeks ended December 27, 2016, we amended an existing lease at one restaurant location to acquire additional square footage. As a result of this amendment, the lease qualified as a capital lease.
On November 1, 2013, we entered into Omnibus Amendment No. 1 and Consent to Credit Agreement and Guaranty with respect to our revolving credit facility dated as of August 12, 2011 with a syndicate of commercial lenders led by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., PNC Bank, N.A., and Wells Fargo, N.A. The amended revolving credit facility, which has a maturity date of November 1, 2018, remains an unsecured, revolving credit agreement under which we may borrow up to $200.0 million. The amendment provides us with the option to increase the revolving credit facility by $200.0 million, up to $400.0 million, subject to certain limitations.
The terms of the amended revolving credit facility require us to pay interest on outstanding borrowings at the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") plus a margin of 0.875% to 1.875%, depending on our leverage ratio, or the Alternate Base Rate, which is the higher of the issuing bank’s prime lending rate, the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50% or the Adjusted Eurodollar Rate for a one month interest period on such day plus 1.0%. We are also required to pay a commitment fee of 0.125% to 0.30% per year on any unused portion of the amended revolving credit facility, depending on our leverage ratio. The weighted-average interest rate for the amended revolving credit facility at June 27, 2017 and December 27, 2016 was 2.08% and 1.57%, respectively. At June 27, 2017, we had $50.0 million outstanding under the amended revolving credit facility and $142.9 million of availability, net of $7.1 million of outstanding letters of credit.
The lenders’ obligation to extend credit under the amended revolving credit facility depends on us maintaining certain financial covenants, including a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio of 2.00 to 1.00 and a maximum consolidated leverage ratio of 3.00 to 1.00. Our amended revolving credit facility permits us to incur additional secured or unsecured indebtedness outside the facility, except for the incurrence of secured indebtedness that in the aggregate exceeds 20% of our consolidated tangible net worth or circumstances where the incurrence of secured or unsecured indebtedness would prevent us from complying with our financial covenants. We were in compliance with all financial covenants as of June 27, 2017.
(4) Income Taxes
A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to our effective tax rate for the 13 and 26 weeks ended June 27, 2017 and June 28, 2016 is as follows:
|
|
13 Weeks Ended |
|
|
26 Weeks Ended |
|
|
||||
|
|
June 27, 2017 |
|
June 28, 2016 |
|
|
June 27, 2017 |
|
June 28, 2016 |
|
|
Tax at statutory federal rate |
|
35.0 |
% |
35.0 |
% |
|
35.0 |
% |
35.0 |
% |
|
State and local tax, net of federal benefit |
|
3.4 |
|
3.5 |
|
|
3.4 |
|
3.5 |
|
|
FICA tip tax credit |
|
(7.2) |
|
(6.5) |
|
|
(7.1) |
|
(6.8) |
|
|
Work opportunity tax credit |
|
(0.8) |
|
(0.9) |
|
|
(0.8) |
|
(0.8) |
|
|
Stock compensation |
|
(1.8) |
|
— |
|
|
(2.5) |
|
— |
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
(1.1) |
|
(0.9) |
|
|
(1.1) |
|
(0.9) |
|
|
Other |
|
0.4 |
|
— |
|
|
0.3 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
Total |
|
27.9 |
% |
30.2 |
% |
|
27.2 |
% |
30.1 |
% |
|
As a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-09, excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies from share-based compensation are recognized within the income tax provision in the period in which the restricted shares vest or options are exercised. During the 13 weeks ended June 27, 2017, we recognized $1.0 million as an income tax benefit, which resulted in a 1.8% impact on the tax rate. During the 26 weeks ended June 27, 2017, we recognized $2.6 million as an income tax benefit, which resulted in a 2.5% impact on the tax rate. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-09, excess tax benefits and deficiencies were recognized in additional paid-in capital in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets.
During the first quarter of 2017, we adopted ASU 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, which required deferred tax assets and liabilities to be classified as noncurrent on our condensed consolidated balance sheet. We adopted ASU 2015-17 on a prospective basis.
10
(5)Commitments and Contingencies
The estimated cost of completing capital project commitments at June 27, 2017 and December 27, 2016 was approximately $144.6 million and $157.5 million, respectively.
As of June 27, 2017 and December 27, 2016, we were contingently liable for $16.0 million and $16.4 million, respectively, for seven leases, listed in the table below. These amounts represent the maximum potential liability of future payments under the guarantees. In the event of default, the indemnity and default clauses in our assignment agreements govern our ability to pursue and recover damages incurred. No material liabilities have been recorded as of June 27, 2017 and December 27, 2016 as the likelihood of default was deemed to be less than probable and the fair value of the guarantees is not considered significant.
|
|
Lease |
|
Current Lease |
|
Everett, Massachusetts (1)(2) |
|
September 2002 |
|
February 2023 |
|
Longmont, Colorado (1) |
|
October 2003 |
|
May 2019 |
|
Montgomeryville, Pennsylvania (1) |
|
October 2004 |
|
March 2021 |
|
Fargo, North Dakota (1)(2) |
|
February 2006 |
|
July 2021 |
|
Logan, Utah (1) |
|
January 2009 |
|
August 2019 |
|
Irving, Texas (3) |
|
December 2013 |
|
December 2019 |
|
Louisville, Kentucky (3)(4) |
|
December 2013 |
|
November 2023 |
|
(1) |
Real estate lease agreements for restaurant locations which we entered into before granting franchise rights to those restaurants. We have subsequently assigned the leases to the franchisees, but remain contingently liable, under the terms of the lease, if the franchisee defaults. |
(2) |
As discussed in note 7, these restaurants are owned, in whole or part, by certain officers, directors and 5% shareholders of the Company. |
(3) |
Leases associated with restaurants which were sold. The leases were assigned to the acquirer, but we remain contingently liable under the terms of the lease if the acquirer defaults. |
(4) |
We may be released from liability after the initial contractual lease term expiration contingent upon certain conditions being met by the acquirer. |
During the 13 and 26 weeks ended June 27, 2017, we bought most of our beef from three suppliers. Although there are a limited number of beef suppliers, we believe that other suppliers could provide a similar product on comparable terms. A change in suppliers, however, could cause supply shortages, higher costs to secure adequate supplies and a possible loss of sales, which would affect operating results adversely. We have no material minimum purchase commitments with our vendors that extend beyond a year.
We and the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission entered into a consent decree dated March 31, 2017 (the "Consent Decree") to settle the lawsuit styled Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Texas Roadhouse, Inc., Texas Roadhouse Holdings LLC and Texas Roadhouse Management Corp. in the United States District Court, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action Number 1:11-cv-11732 (the "Lawsuit"). The Consent Decree resolves the issues litigated in the Lawsuit. Under the Consent Decree, among other terms, we have established a fund of $12.0 million, from which awards of monetary relief, allocated as wages for tax purposes, may be made to eligible claimants in accordance with procedures set forth in the Consent Decree. We recorded a pre-tax charge of $14.9 million ($9.2 million after-tax) related to the Lawsuit and Consent Decree. The pre-tax charge includes $12.6 million of costs associated with the legal settlement and $2.3 million of legal fees associated with the defense of the case during the 13 weeks ended March 28, 2017. The pre-tax charge was recorded in general and administrative expense in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.
Occasionally, we are a defendant in litigation arising in the ordinary course of our business, including "slip and fall" accidents, employment related claims and claims from guests or employees alleging illness, injury or food quality, health or operational concerns. None of these types of litigation, most of which are covered by insurance, has had a material effect on us and, as of the date of this report, we are not party to any litigation that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our business.
11
(6) Acquisitions
On December 28, 2016, we acquired four franchise restaurants in Florida and Georgia. Pursuant to the terms of the acquisition agreements, we paid a total purchase price of $16.5 million, net of cash acquired. Two of the acquired restaurants are wholly-owned and the remaining two restaurants are majority-owned. These acquisitions are consistent with our long-term strategy to increase net income and earnings per share.
These transactions were accounted for using the purchase method as defined in ASC 805, Business Combinations ("ASC 805"). Based on a purchase price of $16.5 million, $4.5 million of goodwill was generated by the acquisition, which is not amortizable for book purposes, but is deductible for tax purposes.
The purchase price has been preliminarily allocated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
$ |
170 |
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
|
12,281 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
4,469 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
(392) |
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,528 |
|
Pro forma results of operations and revenue and earnings for the 26 weeks ended June 27, 2017 have not been presented because the effect of the acquisitions was not material to our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
(7) Related Party Transactions
As of June 27, 2017 and June 28, 2016, we had 10 franchise restaurants owned in whole or part, by certain of our officers, directors and 5% stockholders of the Company. For both of the 13 week periods ended June 27, 2017 and June 28, 2016, these entities paid us fees of approximately $0.5 million. For the 26 week periods ended June 27, 2017 and June 28, 2016, these entities paid us fees of approximately $1.1 million and $1.0 million, respectively. As disclosed in note 5, we are contingently liable on leases which are related to two of these restaurants.
(8) Earnings Per Share
The share and net income per share data for all periods presented are based on the historical weighted-average shares outstanding. The diluted earnings per share calculations show the effect of the weighted-average stock options and RSUs outstanding from our equity incentive plans as discussed in note 2.
For the 13 week period ended June 27, 2017, there were 17,691 shares of nonvested stock that were outstanding, but not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive effect. There were no shares of nonvested stock that had an anti-dilutive effect during the 13 week period ended June 28, 2016. For the 26 week periods ended June 27, 2017 and June 28, 2016, there were 31,136 and 8,749 shares of nonvested stock, respectively, that had an anti-dilutive effect. For all periods presented, there were no outstanding options that had an anti-dilutive effect.
PSUs are not included in the diluted earnings per share calculation until the performance-based criteria have been met. See note 2 for further discussion of PSUs.
12
The following table sets forth the calculation of earnings per share and weighted-average shares outstanding (in thousands) as presented in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income:
|
|
13 Weeks Ended |
|
26 Weeks Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
June 27, 2017 |
|
June 28, 2016 |
|
June 27, 2017 |
|
June 28, 2016 |
|
||||
Net income attributable to Texas Roadhouse, Inc. and subsidiaries |
|
$ |
37,581 |
|
$ |
33,605 |
|
$ |
71,894 |
|
$ |
69,198 |
|
Basic EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
70,973 |
|
|
70,368 |
|
|
70,876 |
|
|
70,269 |
|
Basic EPS |
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
$ |
1.01 |
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
Diluted EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
70,973 |
|
|
70,368 |
|
|
70,876 |
|
|
70,269 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock options and nonvested stock |
|
|
464 |
|
|
508 |
|
|
522 |
|
|
571 |
|
Shares-diluted |
|
|
71,437 |
|
|
70,876 |
|
|
71,398 |
|
|
70,840 |
|
Diluted EPS |
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
$ |
1.01 |
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
(9) Fair Value Measurements
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ("ASC 820"), establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 establishes a three-level hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs in measuring fair value. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability on the measurement date.
Level 1Inputs based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.
Level 2Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the assets, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3Inputs that are unobservable for the asset.
There were no transfers among levels within the fair value hierarchy during the 13 and 26 weeks ended June 27, 2017.
13
The following table presents the fair values for our financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis:
|
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
||||||
|
|
Level |
|
June 27, 2017 |
|
December 27, 2016 |
|
||
Deferred compensation plan—assets |
|
1 |
|
|
25,303 |
|
|
21,951 |
|
Deferred compensation plan—liabilities |
|
1 |
|
|
(25,275) |
|
|
(22,128) |
|
The Second Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan of Texas Roadhouse Management Corp., as amended, (the "Deferred Compensation Plan") is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan which allows highly compensated employees to defer receipt of a portion of their compensation and contribute such amounts to one or more investment funds held in a rabbi trust. We report the amounts of the rabbi trust in other assets and the corresponding liability in other liabilities in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. These investments are considered trading securities and are reported at fair value based on quoted market prices. The realized and unrealized holding gains and losses related to these investments, as well as the offsetting compensation expense, are recorded in general and administrative expense in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.
At June 27, 2017 and December 27, 2016, the fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximated their carrying values based on the short-term nature of these instruments. The fair value of our amended revolving credit facility at June 27, 2017 and December 27, 2016 approximated its carrying value since it is a variable rate credit facility (Level 2). The fair value of our installment loan is estimated based on the current rates offered to us for instruments of similar terms and maturities. The carrying amounts and related estimated fair values for our installment loan are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 27, 2017 |
|
December 27, 2016 |
|
||||||||
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
||||
|
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
||||
Installment loan—Level 2 |
|
$ |
472 |
|
$ |
550 |
|
$ |
550 |
|
$ |
599 |
|
(10) Stock Repurchase Program
On May 22, 2014, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program under which we may repurchase up to $100.0 million of our common stock. This stock repurchase program has no expiration date and replaced a previous stock repurchase program which was approved on February 16, 2012. All repurchases to date under our stock repurchase program have been made through open market transactions. The timing and the amount of any repurchases will be determined by management under parameters established by our Board of Directors, based on an evaluation of our stock price, market conditions and other corporate considerations.
We did not repurchase any shares of common stock during the 13 and 26 week periods ended June 27, 2017. As of June 27, 2017, we had approximately $69.9 million remaining under our authorized stock repurchase program. For the 13 week period ended June 28, 2016, we did not repurchase any shares of common stock. For the 26 week period ended June 28, 2016, we paid approximately $4.1 million to repurchase 114,700 shares of our common stock.
14
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
This report contains forward-looking statements based on our current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry and certain assumptions made by us. Words such as "anticipates," "expects," "intends," "plans," "believes," "seeks," "estimates," "may," "will" and variations of these words or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements that refer to expectations, projections or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements. Such statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. The section entitled "Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2016, in Part II, Item 1A in this Form 10-Q and disclosures in our other Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") filings discuss some of the important risk factors that may affect our business, results of operations, or financial condition. You should carefully consider those risks, in addition to the other information in this report, and in our other filings with the SEC, before deciding to invest in our Company or to maintain or increase your investment. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason. The information contained in this Form 10-Q is not a complete description of our business or the risks associated with an investment in our common stock. We urge you to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report and in our other reports filed with the SEC that discuss our business in greater detail and advise interested parties of certain risks, uncertainties and other factors that may affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.
OVERVIEW
Texas Roadhouse, Inc. is a growing restaurant company operating predominately in the casual dining segment. Our founder, chairman and chief executive officer ("CEO"), W. Kent Taylor, started the business in 1993 with the opening of the first Texas Roadhouse restaurant in Clarksville, Indiana. Since then, we have grown to 532 restaurants in 49 states and six foreign countries. Our mission statement is "Legendary Food, Legendary Service®." Our operating strategy is designed to position each of our restaurants as the local hometown favorite for a broad segment of consumers seeking high quality, affordable meals served with friendly, attentive service. As of June 27, 2017, our 532 restaurants included:
· |
448 "company restaurants," of which 430 were wholly-owned and 18 were majority-owned. The results of operations of company restaurants are included in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. The portion of income attributable to noncontrolling interests in company restaurants that are not wholly-owned is reflected in the line item entitled "Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests" in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. Of the 448 restaurants we owned and operated as of June 27, 2017, we operated 428 as Texas Roadhouse restaurants and operated 18 as Bubba’s 33 restaurants. In addition, we operated two restaurants outside of the casual dining segment. |
· |
84 "franchise restaurants," 24 of which we have a 5.0% to 10.0% ownership interest. The income derived from our minority interests in these 24 franchise restaurants is reported in the line item entitled "Equity income from investments in unconsolidated affiliates" in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. Additionally, we provide various management services to these franchise restaurants, as well as six additional franchise restaurants in which we have no ownership interest. All of the franchise restaurants operated as Texas Roadhouse restaurants. |
We have contractual arrangements which grant us the right to acquire at pre-determined formulas the remaining equity interests in 16 of the 18 majority-owned company restaurants and 66 of the franchise restaurants.
Throughout this report, we use the term "restaurants" to include Texas Roadhouse and Bubba’s 33, unless otherwise noted.
15
Presentation of Financial and Operating Data
Throughout this report, the 13 weeks ended June 27, 2017 and June 28, 2016 are referred to as Q2 2017 and Q2 2016, respectively. The 26 weeks ended June 27, 2017 and June 28, 2016 are referred to as 2017 YTD and 2016 YTD, respectively.
Long-term Strategies to Grow Earnings Per Share and Create Shareholder Value
Our long-term strategies with respect to increasing net income and earnings per share, along with creating shareholder value, include the following:
Expanding Our Restaurant Base. We will continue to evaluate opportunities to develop restaurants in existing markets and in new domestic and international markets. Domestically, we will remain focused primarily on markets where we believe a significant demand for our restaurants exists because of population size, income levels and the presence of shopping and entertainment centers and a significant employment base. Our ability to expand our restaurant base is influenced by many factors beyond our control and, therefore, we may not be able to achieve our anticipated growth.
In 2017 YTD, we opened 13 company restaurants while our franchise partners opened two restaurants. We currently plan to open 27 to 29 company restaurants in 2017 including approximately four Bubba’s 33 restaurants. In addition, we anticipate that our existing franchise partners will open as many as seven, primarily international, Texas Roadhouse restaurants during 2017.
Our average capital investment for the 21 Texas Roadhouse restaurants opened during 2016, including pre‑opening expenses and a capitalized rent factor, was $5.0 million. We expect our average capital investment for Texas Roadhouse restaurants opening in 2017 to be approximately $5.2 million. For 2016, the average capital investment, including pre-opening expenses and a capitalized rent factor, for the nine Bubba’s 33 restaurants opened during the year was $6.6 million. We expect our average capital investment for Bubba’s 33 restaurants opening in 2017 to be approximately $6.3 million.
We remain focused on driving sales and managing restaurant investment costs to maintain our restaurant development in the future. Our capital investment (including cash and non-cash costs) for new restaurants varies significantly depending on a number of factors including, but not limited to: the square footage, layout, scope of required site work, type of construction labor (union or non-union), local permitting requirements, our ability to negotiate with landlords, cost of liquor and other licenses and hook-up fees and geographical location.
We may, at our discretion, add franchise restaurants, domestically and/or internationally, primarily with franchisees who have demonstrated prior success with Texas Roadhouse or other restaurant concepts and in markets in which the franchisee demonstrates superior knowledge of the demographics and restaurant operating conditions. In conjunction with this strategy, we signed our first international franchise development agreement in 2010 for the development of Texas Roadhouse restaurants in eight countries in the Middle East over a 10-year period. In 2015, we amended our agreement in the Middle East to add one country to the territory. In addition to the Middle East, we currently have signed franchise development agreements for the development of Texas Roadhouse restaurants in Taiwan, the Philippines, Mexico and China. We currently have 10 restaurants open in four countries in the Middle East, two restaurants open in Taiwan and two in the Philippines for a total of 14 restaurants in six foreign countries. Additionally, in 2010, we entered into a joint venture agreement with a casual dining restaurant operator in China for a minority ownership in four non‑Texas Roadhouse restaurants, all of which are currently open. We continue to explore opportunities in other countries for international expansion. We may also look to acquire domestic franchise restaurants under terms favorable to us and our stockholders. In Q1 2017, we acquired four franchise restaurants located in Florida and Georgia for an aggregate purchase price of $16.5 million. Additionally, from time to time, we will evaluate potential mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures or other strategic initiatives to acquire or develop additional concepts domestically and/or internationally.
16
Maintaining and/or Improving Restaurant Level Profitability. We plan to maintain, or possibly increase, restaurant-level profitability (restaurant margin) through a combination of increased comparable restaurant sales and operating cost management. In general, we continue to balance the impacts of inflationary pressures with our value positioning as we remain focused on our long-term success. This may create a challenge in terms of maintaining and/or increasing restaurant margin, as a percentage of restaurant sales, in any given year, depending on the level of inflation we experience. In addition to restaurant margin, as a percentage of restaurant sales, we also focus on the growth of restaurant margin dollars per store week as a measure of restaurant-level profitability. In terms of driving higher guest traffic counts, we remain focused on encouraging repeat visits by our guests and attracting new guests through our continued commitment to operational standards relating to food and service quality. To attract new guests and increase the frequency of visits of our existing guests, we also continue to drive various localized marketing programs, focus on speed of service and increase throughput by adding seats in certain restaurants.
Leveraging Our Scalable Infrastructure. To support our growth, we continue to make investments in our infrastructure. Over the past several years, we have made significant investments in our infrastructure, including information and accounting systems, real estate, human resources, legal, marketing, international and restaurant operations, including the development of new concepts. Our goal is for general and administrative costs to increase at a slower growth rate than our revenue. Whether we can leverage our infrastructure in future years will depend, in part, on our new restaurant openings, our comparable restaurant sales growth rate going forward and the level of investment we continue to make in our infrastructure.
Returning Capital to Shareholders. We continue to pay dividends and evaluate opportunities to return capital to our shareholders through repurchases of common stock. In 2011, our Board of Directors declared our first quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share of common stock. We have consistently grown our per share dividend each year since that time and our long-term strategy includes increasing our regular quarterly dividend amount over time. On May 18, 2017, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share of common stock. The declaration and payment of cash dividends on our common stock is at the discretion of our Board of Directors, and any decision to declare a dividend will be based on many factors, including, but not limited to, earnings, financial condition, applicable covenants under our amended revolving credit facility, other contractual restrictions and other factors deemed relevant.
In 2008, our Board of Directors approved our first stock repurchase program. From inception through June 27, 2017, we have paid $216.6 million through our authorized stock repurchase programs to repurchase 14,844,851 shares of our common stock at an average price per share of $14.59. On May 22, 2014, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program under which we may repurchase up to $100.0 million of our common stock. This stock repurchase program has no expiration date and replaced a previous stock repurchase program which was approved on February 16, 2012. All repurchases to date have been made through open market transactions. As of June 27, 2017, $69.9 million remains authorized for stock repurchases.
Key Measures We Use to Evaluate Our Company
Key measures we use to evaluate and assess our business include the following:
Number of Restaurant Openings. Number of restaurant openings reflects the number of restaurants opened during a particular fiscal period. For company restaurant openings, we incur pre‑opening costs, which are defined below, before the restaurant opens. Typically, new Texas Roadhouse restaurants open with an initial start‑up period of higher than normalized sales volumes, which decrease to a steady level approximately three to six months after opening. However, although sales volumes are generally higher, so are initial costs, resulting in restaurant margins that are generally lower during the start‑up period of operation and increase to a steady level approximately three to six months after opening.
Comparable Restaurant Sales Growth. Comparable restaurant sales growth reflects the change in sales for company-owned restaurants over the same period in prior years for the comparable restaurant base. We define the comparable restaurant base to include those restaurants open for a full 18 months before the beginning of the current interim period excluding restaurants closed during the period. Comparable restaurant sales growth can be impacted by changes in guest traffic counts or by changes in the per person average check amount. Menu price changes and the mix of menu items sold can affect the per person average check amount.
17
Average Unit Volume. Average unit volume represents the average quarterly or annual restaurant sales for company-owned restaurants open for a full six months before the beginning of the period measured excluding restaurants closed during the period. Historically, average unit volume growth is less than comparable restaurant sales growth which indicates that newer restaurants are operating with sales levels lower than the company average. At times, average unit volume growth may be more than comparable restaurant sales growth which indicates that newer restaurants are operating with sales levels higher than the company average.
Store Weeks. Store weeks represent the number of weeks that our company-owned restaurants were open during the reporting period.
Restaurant Margin. Restaurant margin (in dollars and as a percentage of restaurant sales) represents restaurant sales less operating costs, including cost of sales, labor, rent and other operating costs. Depreciation and amortization expense, substantially all of which relates to restaurant-level assets, is excluded from restaurant operating costs and is shown separately as it represents a non-cash charge for the investment in our restaurants. Restaurant margin is widely regarded as a useful metric by which to evaluate restaurant-level operating efficiency and performance. Restaurant margin is not a measurement determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") and should not be considered in isolation, or as an alternative, to income from operations or other similarly titled measures of other companies. Restaurant margin, as a percentage of restaurant sales, may fluctuate based on many factors, including, but not limited to, inflationary pressures, commodity costs and wage rates. As such, we also focus on the growth of restaurant margin dollars per store week as a measure of restaurant-level profitability as it provides additional insight on operating performance.
Other Key Definitions
Restaurant Sales. Restaurant sales include gross food and beverage sales, net of promotions and discounts, for all company-owned restaurants. Sales taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are accounted for on a net basis and therefore are excluded from restaurant sales in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.
Franchise Royalties and Fees. Franchise royalties consist of royalties, as defined in our franchise agreements, paid to us by domestic and international franchisees. Domestic and/or international franchisees also typically pay an initial franchise fee for each new restaurant or territory. The terms of the international agreements may vary significantly from our domestic agreements.
Restaurant Cost of Sales. Restaurant cost of sales consists of food and beverage costs of which approximately 50% relates to beef costs.
Restaurant Labor Expenses. Restaurant labor expenses include all direct and indirect labor costs incurred in operations except for profit-sharing incentive compensation expenses earned by our restaurant managing partners and market partners. These profit-sharing expenses are reflected in restaurant other operating expenses. Restaurant labor expenses also include share-based compensation expense related to restaurant-level employees.
Restaurant Rent Expense. Restaurant rent expense includes all rent, except pre-opening rent, associated with the leasing of real estate and includes base, percentage and straight-line rent expense.
Restaurant Other Operating Expenses. Restaurant other operating expenses consist of all other restaurant-level operating costs, the major components of which are utilities, supplies, local store advertising, repairs and maintenance, equipment rent, property taxes, credit card and gift card fees and general liability insurance offset by gift card breakage income. Profit-sharing incentive compensation expenses earned by our restaurant managing partners and market partners are also included in restaurant other operating expenses.
Pre-opening Expenses. Pre-opening expenses, which are charged to operations as incurred, consist of expenses incurred before the opening of a new restaurant and are comprised principally of opening team and training team
18
compensation and benefits, travel expenses, rent, food, beverage and other initial supplies and expenses. On average, over 70% of total pre-opening costs incurred per restaurant opening relate to the hiring and training of employees. Pre-opening costs vary by location depending on many factors, including the size and physical layout of each location; the number of management and hourly employees required to operate each restaurant; the availability of qualified restaurant staff members; the cost of travel and lodging for different geographic areas; the timing of the restaurant opening; and the extent of unexpected delays, if any, in obtaining final licenses and permits to open the restaurants.
Depreciation and Amortization Expenses. Depreciation and amortization expenses ("D&A") include the depreciation of fixed assets and amortization of intangibles with definite lives, substantially all of which relates to restaurant-level assets.
Impairment and Closure Costs. Impairment and closure costs include any impairment of long-lived assets, including goodwill, and expenses associated with the closure of a restaurant. Closure costs also include any gains or losses associated with a relocated restaurant or the sale of a closed restaurant and/or assets held for sale as well as lease costs associated with closed or relocated restaurants.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses ("G&A") are comprised of expenses associated with corporate and administrative functions that support development and restaurant operations and provide an infrastructure to support future growth including certain advertising costs incurred less amounts remitted by franchise restaurants. Supervision and accounting fees received from certain franchise restaurants are offset against G&A. G&A also includes legal fees, settlement charges and share-based compensation expense related to executive officers, support center employees and area managers, including market partners. The realized and unrealized holding gains and losses related to the investments in our deferred compensation plan, as well as offsetting compensation expense, are also recorded in G&A.
Interest Expense, Net. Interest expense includes the cost of our debt or financing obligations including the amortization of loan fees, reduced by interest income and capitalized interest. Interest income includes earnings on cash and cash equivalents.
Equity Income from Unconsolidated Affiliates. As of June 27, 2017 and June 28, 2016, we owned a 5.0% to 10.0% equity interest in 24 franchise restaurants. Additionally, as of June 27, 2017 and June 28, 2016, we owned a 40% equity interest in four non-Texas Roadhouse restaurants as part of a joint venture agreement with a casual dining restaurant operator in China. Equity income from unconsolidated affiliates represents our percentage share of net income earned by these unconsolidated affiliates.
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests represents the portion of income attributable to the other owners of the majority-owned restaurants. Our consolidated subsidiaries at June 27, 2017 and June 28, 2016 included 18 and 16 majority-owned restaurants, respectively, all of which were open.
Q2 2017 Financial Highlights
Total revenue increased $57.5 million, or 11.3%, to $566.3 million in Q2 2017 compared to $508.8 million in Q2 2016 primarily due to the opening of new restaurants combined with an increase in average unit volume driven by comparable restaurant sales growth. Store weeks and comparable restaurant sales increased 7.9% and 4.0%, respectively, at company restaurants in Q2 2017.
Restaurant margin increased $9.5 million to $106.5 million in Q2 2017 compared to $97.0 million in Q2 2016 while restaurant margin, as a percentage of restaurant sales, decreased to 18.9% in Q2 2017 compared to 19.2% in Q2 2016. The decrease in restaurant margin, as a percentage of restaurant sales, was primarily due to higher labor costs as a result of higher average wage rates and a change in our compensation structure. Higher labor costs were partially offset by commodity deflation of approximately 1.9% driven by lower food costs, primarily beef.
Net income increased $4.0 million, or 11.8%, to $37.6 million in Q2 2017 compared to $33.6 million in Q2 2016 primarily due to an increase in restaurant margin dollars, partially offset by higher depreciation costs and higher general and administrative expense. Diluted earnings per share increased in Q2 2017 by 11.0% to $0.53 from $0.47 in Q2 2016.
19
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
13 Weeks Ended |
|
26 Weeks Ended |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
June 27, 2017 |
|
June 28, 2016 |
|
June 27, 2017 |
|
June 28, 2016 |
|
||||||||
|
|
$ |
|
% |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
(In thousands) |
|
||||||||||||
Consolidated Statements of Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restaurant sales |
|
562,160 |
|
99.3 |
|
504,630 |
|
99.2 |
|
1,125,480 |
|
99.3 |
|
1,015,914 |
|
99.2 |
|
Franchise royalties and fees |
|
4,102 |
|
0.7 |
|
4,178 |
|
0.8 |
|
8,468 |
|
0.7 |
|
8,453 |
|
0.8 |
|
Total revenue |
|
566,262 |
|
100.0 |
|
508,808 |
|
100.0 |
|
1,133,948 |
|
100.0 |
|
1,024,367 |
|
100.0 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As a percentage of restaurant sales) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restaurant operating costs (excluding depreciation and amortization shown separately below): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
185,171 |
|
32.9 |
|
171,551 |
|
34.0 |
|
369,364 |
|
32.8 |
|
344,679 |
|
33.9 |
|
Labor |
|
174,585 |
|
31.1 |
|
150,014 |
|
29.7 |
|
344,932 |
|
30.6 |
|
297,560 |
|
29.3 |
|
Rent |
|
11,112 |
|
2.0 |
|
10,184 |
|
2.0 |
|
21,981 |
|
2.0 |
|
20,211 |
|
2.0 |
|
Other operating |
|
84,837 |
|
15.1 |
|
75,887 |
|
15.0 |
|
170,497 |
|
15.1 |
|
153,499 |
|
15.1 |
|
(As a percentage of total revenue) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-opening |
|
5,014 |
|
0.9 |
|
4,411 |
|
0.9 |
|
9,754 |
|
0.9 |
|
9,236 |
|
0.9 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
23,106 |
|
4.1 |
|
20,238 |
|
4.0 |
|
45,702 |
|
4.0 |
|
39,777 |
|
3.9 |
|
Impairment and closure |
|
— |
|
NM |
|
30 |
|
NM |
|
11 |
|
NM |
|
41 |
|
NM |
|
General and administrative |
|
28,223 |
|
5.0 |
|
26,711 |
|
5.2 |
|
68,471 |
|
6.0 |
|
56,771 |
|
5.5 |
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
512,048 |
|
90.4 |
|
459,026 |
|
90.2 |
|
1,030,712 |
|
90.9 |
|
921,774 |
|
90.0 |
|
Income from operations |
|
54,214 |
|
9.6 |
|
49,782 |
|
9.8 |
|
103,236 |
|
9.1 |
|
102,593 |
|
10.0 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
379 |
|
0.1 |
|
309 |
|
0.1 |
|
711 |
|
0.1 |
|
614 |
|
0.1 |
|
Equity income from investments in unconsolidated affiliates |
|
(470) |
|
(0.1) |
|
(475) |
|
(0.1) |
|
(790) |
|
(0.1) |
|
(827) |
|
(0.1) |
|
Income before taxes |
|
54,305 |
|
9.6 |
|
49,948 |
|
9.8 |
|
103,315 |
|
9.1 |
|
102,806 |
|
10.0 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
15,126 |
|
2.7 |
|
15,087 |
|
3.0 |
|
28,113 |
|
2.5 |
|
30,944 |
|
3.0 |
|
Net income including noncontrolling interests |
|
39,179 |
|
6.9 |
|
34,861 |
|
6.9 |
|
75,202 |
|
6.6 |
|
71,862 |
|
7.0 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
1,598 |
|
0.3 |
|
1,256 |
|
0.2 |
|
3,308 |
|
0.3 |
|
2,664 |
|
0.3 |
|
Net income attributable to Texas Roadhouse, Inc. and subsidiaries |
|
37,581 |
|
6.6 |
|
33,605 |
|
6.6 |
|
71,894 |
|
6.3 |
|
69,198 |
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
13 Weeks Ended |
|
26 Weeks Ended |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
June 27, 2017 |
|
June 28, 2016 |
|
June 27, 2017 |
|
June 28, 2016 |
|
||||||||
|
|
$ |
|
% |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
(As a percentage of restaurant sales) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restaurant margin ($ in thousands) |
|
106,455 |
|
18.9 |
|
96,994 |
|
19.2 |
|
218,706 |
|
19.4 |
|
199,965 |
|
19.7 |
|
Restaurant margin $/store week |
|
18,434 |
|
|
|
18,130 |
|
|
|
19,091 |
|
|
|
18,843 |
|
|
|
See page 18 for the definition of restaurant margin.
NM — Not meaningful
20
Restaurant Unit Activity
|
|
Total |
|
Texas Roadhouse |
|
Bubba's 33 |
|
Jaggers |
Balance at December 27, 2016 |
|
517 |
|
499 |
|
16 |
|
2 |
Company openings |
|
13 |
|
11 |
|
2 |
|
— |
Franchise openings - Domestic |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
— |
|
— |
Franchise openings - International |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
— |
|
— |
Balance at June 27, 2017 |
|
532 |
|
512 |
|
18 |
|
2 |
Q2 2017 (13 weeks) compared to Q2 2016 (13 weeks) and 2017 YTD (26 weeks) compared to 2016 YTD (26 weeks)
Restaurant Sales. Restaurant sales increased by 11.4% in Q2 2017 as compared to Q2 2016 and by 10.8% in 2017 YTD compared to 2016 YTD. The following table summarizes certain key drivers and/or attributes of restaurant sales at company restaurants for the periods presented. Company restaurant count activity is shown in the restaurant unit activity table above.
|
|
Q2 2017 |
|
Q2 2016 |
|
2017 YTD |
|
2016 YTD |
|
|
||||
Company Restaurants: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in store weeks |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
8.4 |
% |
|
8.0 |
% |
|
8.4 |
% |
|
Increase in average unit volume |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
3.7 |
% |
|
2.7 |
% |
|
4.0 |
% |
|
Other(1) |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
(0.1) |
% |
|
0.1 |
% |
|
(0.4) |
% |
|
Total increase in restaurant sales |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
12.0 |
% |
|
10.8 |
% |
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Store weeks |
|
|
5,775 |
|
|
5,350 |
|
|
11,456 |
|
|
10,612 |
|
|
Comparable restaurant sales growth |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
4.5 |
% |
|
3.6 |
% |
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas Roadhouse restaurants only: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable restaurant sales growth |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
4.5 |
% |
|
3.7 |
% |
|
4.5 |
% |
|
Average unit volume (in thousands) |
|
$ |
1,274 |
|
$ |
1,233 |
|
$ |
2,575 |
|
$ |
2,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weekly sales by group: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable restaurants (389 and 361 units, respectively) |
|
$ |
98,689 |
|
$ |
95,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average unit volume restaurants (23 and 24 units, respectively)(2) |
|
$ |
85,958 |
|
$ |
84,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restaurants less than six months old (16 and 18 units, respectively) |
|
$ |
105,972 |
|
$ |
98,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes the impact of the year-over-year change in sales volume of all non-Texas Roadhouse restaurants, along with Texas Roadhouse restaurants open less than six months before the beginning of the period measured and, if applicable, the impact of restaurants closed or acquired during the period. |
(2) |
Average unit volume restaurants include restaurants open a full six to 18 months before the beginning of the period measured. |
The increases in restaurant sales for all periods presented were primarily attributable to the opening of new restaurants combined with an increase in average unit volume driven by comparable restaurant sales growth. Comparable restaurant sales growth for all periods presented was due to an increase in our guest traffic counts and an increase in our per person average check as shown in the table below.
|
|
|
Q2 2017 |
|
|
Q2 2016 |
|
|
2017 YTD |
|
|
2016 YTD |
|
|
Guest traffic counts |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
2.9 |
% |
|
2.9 |
% |
|
3.0 |
% |
|
Per person average check |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
1.6 |
% |
|
0.7 |
% |
|
1.5 |
% |
|
Comparable restaurant sales growth |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
4.5 |
% |
|
3.6 |
% |
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
Year-over-year sales for newer restaurants included in our average unit volume, but excluded from our comparable restaurant sales, partially offset the impact of positive comparable restaurant sales growth in Q2 2017 and 2017 YTD.
The increases in our per person average check for the periods presented were primarily driven by menu price increases taken in 2017, 2016 and 2015. In 2016 and 2015, we increased menu prices in the fourth quarter by approximately 1.0% and approximately 2.0%, respectively. In May 2017, we took an additional price increase of 0.5%. These menu price increases were taken as a result of inflationary pressures, primarily commodities and/or labor. In Q2 2017 and 2017 YTD, average guest check did not increase in line with the menu price increases implemented as some guests shifted to lower priced menu items and/or purchased fewer beverages.
In 2017, we plan to open 27 to 29 company restaurants, including approximately four Bubba’s 33 restaurants. We opened 13 restaurants in 2017 YTD including 11 Texas Roadhouse restaurants and two Bubba’s 33 restaurants. We have either begun construction or have sites under contract for purchase or lease for all of our expected 2017 openings.
Franchise Royalties and Fees. Franchise royalties and fees decreased by $0.1 million, or by 1.8%, in Q2 2017 from Q2 2016 and remained relatively flat at $8.5 million in 2017 YTD compared to 2016 YTD. In both Q2 2017 and 2017 YTD, the loss of royalties associated with the acquisition of four franchise restaurants in Q1 2017 and a decrease in average unit volume at international restaurants, driven by a decrease in comparable restaurant sales at those locations, led to a decrease in franchise royalties and fees compared to the prior year periods. These decreases were partially offset in Q2 2017 and more than offset in 2017 YTD by an increase in average unit volume at domestic restaurants, driven by comparable restaurant sales growth, and the opening of new franchise restaurants.
Franchise comparable restaurant sales increased 2.9% and 3.0% in Q2 2017 and 2017 YTD, which included an increase in domestic franchise comparable restaurant sales of 3.6% and 3.8%, respectively. Franchise restaurant count activity is shown in the restaurant activity table above. We anticipate that our existing franchise restaurant partners will open as many as seven, primarily international, Texas Roadhouse restaurants in 2017.
Restaurant Cost of Sales. Restaurant cost of sales, as a percentage of restaurant sales, decreased to 32.9% in Q2 2017 from 34.0% in Q2 2016 and decreased to 32.8% in 2017 YTD from 33.9% in 2016 YTD. These decreases were primarily attributable to commodity deflation and menu pricing actions. 2017 YTD also benefitted from operating efficiencies associated with process improvements at the restaurant level. Commodity deflation of approximately 1.9% in Q2 2017 and 2.1% in 2017 YTD was driven by lower food costs, primarily beef. Recent menu pricing actions are summarized in our discussion of restaurant sales above.
For 2017, we have fixed price contracts for approximately 65% of our overall food costs with the remainder subject to fluctuating market prices. We expect 1.0% to 2.0% food cost deflation in 2017.
Restaurant Labor Expenses. Restaurant labor expenses, as a percentage of restaurant sales, increased to 31.1% in Q2 2017 compared to 29.7% in Q2 2016 and increased to 30.6% in 2017 YTD compared to 29.3% in 2016 YTD. These increases were primarily attributable to higher average wage rates and a change in our compensation structure, as discussed below, partially offset by the benefit from an increase in average unit volume.
In 2016, the Department of Labor published changes related to the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") which would have resulted in changes to the threshold for overtime pay. The changes were scheduled to go into effect on December 1, 2016, however, in late November a federal judge blocked the implementation of the changes. Despite the injunction, we continued with the implementation of the changes to our overtime policies as originally planned.
In 2017, we anticipate our labor costs will be pressured by mid-single digit inflation due to increases in state-mandated minimum and tipped wages and increased competition for qualified workers, as well as by the impact of changes in our compensation structure as discussed above. We expect the changes to our compensation structure to increase our 2017 labor costs by $4.5 million to $5.5 million, which is included in our mid-single digit labor inflation guidance. These increases may or may not be offset by additional menu price adjustments or guest traffic growth.
22
Restaurant Rent Expense. Restaurant rent expense, as a percentage of restaurant sales, remained relatively unchanged at 2.0% in Q2 2017 compared to Q2 2016 as well as 2017 YTD compared to 2016 YTD. The benefit from an increase in average unit volume was partially offset by higher rent expense, as a percentage of restaurant sales, at our newer restaurants.
Restaurant Other Operating Expenses. Restaurant other operating expenses, as a percentage of restaurant sales, increased slightly to 15.1% in Q2 2017 compared to 15.0% in Q2 2016 and remained relatively unchanged at 15.1% in 2017 YTD compared to 2016 YTD. For both periods, higher repair and maintenance costs and third party gift card fees were mostly offset by lower costs associated with incentive bonus compensation and the benefit of an increase in average unit volume. Higher third party gift card fees were primarily due to the continued growth of our third party gift card program.
Restaurant Pre-opening Expenses. Pre-opening expenses increased to $5.0 million in Q2 2017 from $4.4 million in Q2 2016 and increased to $9.8 million in 2017 YTD from $9.2 million in 2016 YTD. These increases were primarily due to the timing of restaurant openings.
Overall, we plan to open 27 to 29 company-owned restaurants in 2017 compared to 30 company-owned restaurants in 2016. Pre-opening costs will fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on the specific pre-opening costs incurred for each restaurant, the number and timing of restaurant openings and the number and timing of restaurant managers hired.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. D&A, as a percentage of total revenue, increased to 4.1% in Q2 2017 compared to 4.0% in Q2 2016 and increased to 4.0% in 2017 YTD compared to 3.9% in 2016 YTD. These increases were primarily due to higher depreciation, as a percentage of revenue, at new restaurants and increased investment in short-lived assets, such as equipment. This increase was partially offset by the benefit of an increase in average unit volume.
In 2017, we expect D&A, as a percentage of revenue, to continue to be higher than the prior year due to an increase in our capitalized costs related to restaurants opened in 2016 and 2017, along with an increase in the level of reinvestment in our existing restaurants.
General and Administrative Expenses. G&A, as a percentage of total revenue, decreased to 5.0% in Q2 2017 compared to 5.2% in Q2 2016 and increased to 6.0% in 2017 YTD compared to 5.5% in 2016 YTD. In Q2 2017, the decrease was due to lower managing partner conference costs and lower bonus expense along with an increase in average unit volume. In 2017 YTD, the increase was primarily due to a pre-tax charge of $14.9 million ($9.2 million after-tax) related to legal fees and the settlement of a previously disclosed legal matter in March 2017 partially offset by lower managing partner conference costs and lower bonus expense. In addition, 2016 YTD included a pre-tax charge of $5.5 million ($3.4 million after-tax) related to the settlement of a separate legal matter.
Interest Expense, Net. Interest expense increased to $0.4 million in Q2 2017 compared to $0.3 million in Q2 2016 and increased to $0.7 million in 2017 YTD compared to $0.6 million in 2016 YTD. These increases were due to higher interest rates.
Income Tax Expense. Our effective tax rate decreased to 27.9% in Q2 2017 compared to 30.2% in Q2 2016 and decreased to 27.2% in 2017 YTD compared to 30.1% in 2016 YTD primarily due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation. As a result of the new guidance requirements, excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies from share-based compensation are recognized within the income tax provision. During Q2 2017, we recognized $1.0 million, or $0.01 per share, as an income tax benefit. During 2017 YTD, we recognized $2.6 million, or $0.04 per share, as an income tax benefit. For 2017, we expect the effective tax rate to be approximately 28.0%.
23
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table presents a summary of our net cash provided by (used in) operating, investing and financing activities (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 Weeks Ended |
|
||||
|
|
June 27, 2017 |
|
June 28, 2016 |
|
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
128,308 |
|
$ |
114,068 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(90,165) |
|
|
(69,159) |
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(34,579) |
|
|
(8,938) |
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
3,564 |
|
$ |
35,971 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities was $128.3 million in 2017 YTD compared to $114.1 million in 2016 YTD. This increase was primarily due to an increase in net income and non-cash items such as depreciation and amortization expense along with an increase in working capital. The increase in working capital was attributed to an increase in cash flows related to a change in the payment timing of accrued wages in the prior year along with an increase in accounts payable partially offset by a change in deferred revenue related to gift cards.
Our operations have not required significant working capital and, like many restaurant companies, we have been able to operate with negative working capital. Sales are primarily for cash, and restaurant operations do not require significant inventories or receivables. In addition, we receive trade credit for the purchase of food, beverages and supplies, thereby reducing the need for incremental working capital to support growth.
Net cash used in investing activities was $90.2 million in 2017 YTD compared to $69.2 million in 2016 YTD. The increase was primarily due to the acquisition of four franchise restaurants in Q1 2017 for a purchase price of $16.5 million, along with an increase in capital expenditures. The increase in capital expenditures was due to increased spending related to new restaurant openings partially offset by decreased spending related to the refurbishment of existing restaurants such as remodeling, room additions, parking expansions, and other general maintenance.
We require capital principally for the development of new company restaurants, the refurbishment of existing restaurants and the acquisition of franchise restaurants, if any. We either lease our restaurant site locations under operating leases for periods of five to 30 years (including renewal periods) or purchase the land when appropriate. As of June 27, 2017, we had developed 140 of the 448 company restaurants on land which we own.
The following table presents a summary of capital expenditures related to the development of new restaurants and the refurbishment of existing restaurants (in thousands):
|
|
2017 YTD |
|
2016 YTD |
|
||
New company restaurants |
|
$ |
51,321 |
|
$ |
45,137 |
|
Refurbishment of existing restaurants(1) |
|
|
22,316 |
|
|
24,022 |
|
Total capital expenditures |
|
$ |
73,637 |
|
$ |
69,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restaurant-related repairs and maintenance expense(2) |
|
$ |
12,413 |
|
$ |
10,590 |
|
(1) |
Includes minimal capital expenditures related to the support center office. |
(2) |
These amounts were recorded as an expense as incurred. |
Our future capital requirements will primarily depend on the number of new restaurants we open, the timing of those openings and the restaurant prototype developed in a given fiscal year. These requirements will include costs directly related to opening new restaurants and may also include costs necessary to ensure that our infrastructure is able to support a larger restaurant base. In fiscal 2017, we expect our capital expenditures to be approximately $170.0 million, the majority of which will relate to planned restaurant openings, including 27 to 29 restaurant openings in 2017. These amounts exclude any cash used for franchise acquisitions. In Q1 2017, we acquired four franchise restaurants for an aggregate purchase price of $16.5 million. See note 6 in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further
24
discussion of these acquisitions. We intend to satisfy our capital requirements over the next 12 months with cash on hand, net cash provided by operating activities and, if needed, funds available under our amended revolving credit facility. For 2017, we anticipate net cash provided by operating activities will exceed capital expenditures. We currently anticipate this excess will be used to pay dividends, as approved by our Board of Directors, repurchase common stock, and/or repay borrowings under our amended revolving credit facility.
Net cash used in financing activities was $34.6 million in 2017 YTD compared to $8.9 million in 2016 YTD. The increase is due to borrowings on our amended revolving credit facility that occurred in Q1 2016 and an increase in dividends paid and shares withheld for taxes related to share-based compensation. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in spending on share repurchases, along with proceeds from noncontrolling interest contributions.
On May 22, 2014, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program under which we may repurchase up to $100.0 million of our common stock. This stock repurchase program has no expiration date and replaced a previous stock repurchase program which was approved on February 16, 2012. All repurchases to date under our stock repurchase program have been made through open market transactions. The timing and the amount of any repurchases will be determined by management under parameters established by the Board of Directors, based on an evaluation of our stock price, market conditions and other corporate considerations. During 2017 YTD, we made no share repurchases and had approximately $69.9 million remaining under our authorized stock repurchase program as of June 27, 2017.
On May 18, 2017, our Board of Directors authorized the payment of a cash dividend of $0.21 per share of common stock. The payment of this dividend totaling $14.9 million was distributed on June 30, 2017 to shareholders of record at the close of business on June 14, 2017. The declared dividends are included as a liability in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 27, 2017.
We paid distributions of $2.7 million to equity holders of 17 of our 18 majority-owned company restaurants in 2017 YTD. In 2016 YTD, we paid $2.5 million to equity holders of all our 16 majority-owned company restaurants.
On November 1, 2013, we entered into Omnibus Amendment No. 1 and Consent to Credit Agreement and Guaranty with respect to our revolving credit facility dated as of August 12, 2011 with a syndicate of commercial lenders led by JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., PNC Bank, N.A., and Wells Fargo, N.A. The amended revolving credit facility, which has a maturity date of November 1, 2018, remains an unsecured, revolving credit agreement under which we may borrow up to $200.0 million. The amendment provides us with the option to increase the revolving credit facility by $200.0 million, up to $400.0 million, subject to certain limitations.
The terms of the amended revolving credit facility require us to pay interest on outstanding borrowings at the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") plus a margin of 0.875% to 1.875%, depending on our leverage ratio, or the Alternate Base Rate, which is the higher of the issuing bank’s prime lending rate, the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50% or the Adjusted Eurodollar Rate for a one month interest period on such day plus 1.0%. We are also required to pay a commitment fee of 0.125% to 0.30% per year on any unused portion of the amended revolving credit facility, depending on our leverage ratio. The weighted‑average interest rate for the amended revolving credit facility at June 27, 2017 and December 27, 2016 was 2.08% and 1.57%, respectively. At June 27, 2017, we had $50.0 million outstanding under the amended revolving credit facility and $142.9 million of availability, net of $7.1 million of outstanding letters of credit.
The lenders’ obligation to extend credit under the amended revolving credit facility depends on us maintaining certain financial covenants, including a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio of 2.00 to 1.00 and a maximum consolidated leverage ratio of 3.00 to 1.00. The amended revolving credit facility permits us to incur additional secured or unsecured indebtedness outside the facility, except for the incurrence of secured indebtedness that in the aggregate exceeds 20% of our consolidated tangible net worth or circumstances where the incurrence of secured or unsecured indebtedness would prevent us from complying with our financial covenants. We were in compliance with all financial covenants as of June 27, 2017.
At June 27, 2017, in addition to the amounts outstanding on our amended revolving credit facility, we had one other note payable totaling $0.5 million with a fixed interest rate of 10.46%, which relates to the financing of a specific restaurant and is subject to certain prepayment penalties. Our total weighted-average effective interest rate at June 27, 2017 was 2.16%.
25
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes the amount of payments due under specified contractual obligations as of June 27, 2017 (in thousands):
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than |
|
||
|
|
Total |
|
1 year |
|
1 - 3 Years |
|
3 - 5 Years |
|
5 years |
|
|||||
Long-term debt obligations |
|
$ |
52,467 |
|
$ |
176 |
|
|
50,326 |
|
|
29 |
|
$ |
1,936 |
|
Interest(1) |
|
|
7,104 |
|
|
1,309 |
|
|
845 |
|
|
504 |
|
|
4,446 |
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
|
814,633 |
|
|
43,920 |
|
|
87,986 |
|
|
87,276 |
|
|
595,451 |
|
Capital obligations |
|
|
144,637 |
|
|
144,637 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Total contractual obligations(2) |
|
$ |
1,018,841 |
|
$ |
190,042 |
|
$ |
139,157 |
|
$ |
87,809 |
|
$ |
601,833 |
|
(1) |
Uses interest rates as of June 27, 2017 for our variable rate debt. We assumed $50.0 million remains outstanding on the amended revolving credit facility until the expiration date. We calculated interest rate payments on the amended revolving credit facility using an interest rate of 2.08%, which was the interest rate associated with our amended revolving credit facility at June 27, 2017. We assumed a constant rate until maturity for our fixed rate debt. |
(2) |
Unrecognized tax benefits under Accounting Standards Codification 740 are immaterial and, therefore, are excluded from this amount. |
We have no material minimum purchase commitments with our vendors that extend beyond a year. See note 5 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a discussion of contractual obligations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Except for operating leases (primarily restaurant leases), we do not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements.
Guarantees
As of June 27, 2017 and December 27, 2016, we are contingently liable for $16.0 million and $16.4 million, respectively, for seven leases, listed in the table below. These amounts represent the maximum potential liability of future payments under the guarantees. In the event of default, the indemnity and default clauses in our assignment agreements govern our ability to pursue and recover damages incurred. No material liabilities have been recorded as of June 27, 2017 and December 27, 2016 as the likelihood of default was deemed to be less than probable and the fair value of the guarantees is not considered significant.
26
|
|
Lease |
|
Current Lease |
|
|
|
Assignment Date |
|
Term Expiration |
|
Everett, Massachusetts (1)(2) |
|
September 2002 |
|
February 2023 |
|
Longmont, Colorado (1) |
|
October 2003 |
|
May 2019 |
|
Montgomeryville, Pennsylvania (1) |
|
October 2004 |
|
March 2021 |
|
Fargo, North Dakota (1)(2) |
|
February 2006 |
|
July 2021 |
|
Logan, Utah (1) |
|
January 2009 |
|
August 2019 |
|
Irving, Texas (3) |
|
December 2013 |
|
December 2019 |
|
Louisville, Kentucky (3)(4) |
|
December 2013 |
|
November 2023 |
|
(1) |
Real estate lease agreements for restaurant locations which we entered into before granting franchise rights to those restaurants. We have subsequently assigned the leases to the franchisees, but remain contingently liable, under the terms of the lease, if the franchisee defaults. |
(2) |
As discussed in note 7 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, these restaurants are owned, in whole or part, by certain officers, directors and 5% shareholders of the Company. |
(3) |
Leases associated with restaurants which were sold. The leases were assigned to the acquirer, but we remain contingently liable under the terms of the lease if the acquirer defaults. |
(4) |
We may be released from liability after the initial contractual lease term expiration contingent upon certain conditions being met by the acquirer. |
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Revenue Recognition
(Accounting Standards Update 2014‑09, "ASU 2014‑09")
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP when it becomes effective. In July 2015, the FASB approved a one-year deferral of the effective date of the new revenue standard. ASU 2014-09 is now effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2017 (our 2018 fiscal year), including interim periods within those annual periods, with early adoption permitted in the first quarter of 2017. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. In March and April 2016, the FASB issued the following amendments to clarify the implementation guidance: ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net) and ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. Additionally, on December 21, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which provides disclosure relief and clarifies the scope and application of the new revenue standard and related cost guidance. The standard will not impact our recognition of revenue from company-owned restaurants or our recognition of continuing fees from franchisees, which are based on a percentage of franchise sales. Under this standard, initial franchise fees and upfront fees from international development agreements will be recognized over the life of the applicable franchise agreements. We currently recognize initial franchise fees when the related services have been provided, which is generally upon the opening of the restaurant, and upfront fees on a pro-rata basis as restaurants under the development agreement are opened. We are continuing to evaluate the impact the adoption of this standard will have on the recognition of breakage income from our gift card program and which adoption method will be used. We are also evaluating the standard’s impact on transactions currently not classified as revenue such as advertising contributions received from our franchisees.
Leases
(Accounting Standards Update 2016-02, "ASU 2016-02")
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which requires an entity to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for virtually all leases. This update also requires additional disclosures about the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within
27
those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018 (our 2019 fiscal year). Early adoption is permitted. A modified retrospective approach is required for all leases existing or entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the consolidated financial statements.
We had operating leases with remaining rental payments of approximately $814.6 million as of June 27, 2017. The discounted minimum remaining rental payments will be the starting point for determining the right-of-use asset and lease liability. While we are still in the process of assessing the impact of this new standard on our condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows, we expect the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on our consolidated balance sheets due to the recognition of the right-of-use asset and lease liability related to operating leases. While the new standard is also expected to impact the measurement and presentation of elements of expenses and cash flows related to leasing arrangements, we do not presently believe there will be a material impact on our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income or our consolidated statement of cash flows.
Financial Instruments
(Accounting Standards Update 2016-13, "ASU 2016-13")
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which requires measurement and recognition of expected versus incurred losses for financial assets held. ASU 2016-13 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019 (our 2020 fiscal year), with early adoption permitted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. We are currently assessing the impact of this new standard on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Statement of Cash Flows
(Accounting Standards Update 2016-15, "ASU 2016-15")
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which adds and/or clarifies guidance on the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 (our 2018 fiscal year) and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Income Taxes
(Accounting Standards Update 2016-16, "ASU 2016-16")
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740), which addresses the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. Current GAAP prohibits the recognition of current and deferred income taxes for an intra-entity asset transfer until the asset has been sold to an outside party. This standard will require recognition of current and deferred income taxes resulting from an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. ASU 2016-16 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017 (our 2018 fiscal year). Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Goodwill
(Accounting Standards Update 2017-04, "ASU 2017-04")
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04 which simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairment and is expected to reduce the cost and complexity of accounting for goodwill. ASU 2017-04 removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test, which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. Instead, goodwill impairment will be measured using the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the reporting unit. ASU 2017-04 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 (our 2020 fiscal year) and will be applied on a prospective basis. Early adoption is permitted for interim and annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. We are currently assessing the impact of this new standard on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
28
Compensation – Stock Compensation
(Accounting Standards Update 2017-09, "ASU 2017-09")
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting, which clarifies when a change in the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award must be accounted for as a modification. ASU 2017-09 requires modification accounting if the fair value, vesting condition or the classification of the award is not the same immediately before and after a change in the terms and conditions of the award. ASU 2017-09 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017 (our 2018 fiscal year). Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates on variable rate debt and changes in commodity prices. Our exposure to interest rate fluctuations is limited to our outstanding bank debt. The terms of the amended revolving credit facility require us to pay interest on outstanding borrowings at London Interbank Offering Rate ("LIBOR") plus a margin of 0.875% to 1.875%, depending on our leverage ratio, or the Alternate Base Rate, which is the higher of the issuing bank’s prime lending rate, the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50% or the Adjusted Eurodollar Rate for a one month interest period on such day plus 1.0%. At June 27, 2017, we had $50.0 million outstanding under the amended revolving credit facility, which bears interest at approximately 87.5 to 187.5 basis points (depending on our leverage ratios) over LIBOR. The interest rate on our amended revolving credit facility at June 27, 2017 was 2.08%. We had one other note payable totaling $0.5 million with a fixed interest rate of 10.46%. Should interest rates based on this variable rate borrowing increase by one percentage point, our estimated annual interest expense would increase by $0.5 million.
In an effort to secure high quality, low cost ingredients used in the products sold in our restaurants, we employ various purchasing and pricing contract techniques. When purchasing certain types of commodities, we may be subject to prevailing market conditions resulting in unpredictable price volatility. For certain commodities, we may also enter into contracts for terms of one year or less that are either fixed price agreements or fixed volume agreements where the price is negotiated with reference to fluctuating market prices. We currently do not use financial instruments to hedge commodity prices, but we will continue to evaluate their effectiveness. Extreme and/or long term increases in commodity prices could adversely affect our future results, especially if we are unable, primarily due to competitive reasons, to increase menu prices. Additionally, if there is a time lag between the increasing commodity prices and our ability to increase menu prices or if we believe the commodity price increase to be short in duration and we choose not to pass on the cost increases, our short‑term financial results could be negatively affected.
We are subject to business risk as our beef supply is highly dependent upon three vendors. If these vendors were unable to fulfill their obligations under their contracts, we may encounter supply shortages, higher costs to secure adequate supplies and a possible loss of sales, any of which would harm our business.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
We have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to, and as defined in, Rules 13a‑15(e) and 15d‑15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation, performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer (the "CEO") and the Chief Financial Officer (the "CFO"), our management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 27, 2017.
29
Changes in internal control
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
30
Occasionally, we are a defendant in litigation arising in the ordinary course of our business, including "slip and fall" accidents, employment related claims and claims from guests or employees alleging illness, injury or food quality, health or operational concerns. None of these types of litigation, most of which are covered by insurance, has had a material effect on us and, as of the date of this report, we are not party to any litigation that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Information regarding risk factors appears in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2016, under the heading "Special Note Regarding Forward-looking Statements" and in the Form 10-K Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors. There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2016.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
On May 22, 2014, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program which authorized us to repurchase up to $100.0 million of our common stock of which $69.9 million remained outstanding at June 27, 2017. This stock repurchase program has no expiration date and replaced a previous stock repurchase program which was approved on February 16, 2012. All repurchases to date under our stock repurchase program have been made through open market transactions. The timing and the amount of any repurchases through this program will be determined by management under parameters established by our Board of Directors, based on an evaluation of our stock price, market conditions and other corporate considerations. We did not repurchase any shares of common stock during the 26 weeks ended June 27, 2017.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
None.
31
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
10.1 |
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
101.INS |
|
XBRL Instance Document |
101.SCH |
|
XBRL Schema Document |
101.CAL |
|
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document |
101.DEF |
|
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document |
101.LAB |
|
XBRL Label Linkbase Document |
101.PRE |
|
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document |
32
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
TEXAS ROADHOUSE, INC. |
|
|
|
|
Date: August 4, 2017 |
By: |
/s/ W. KENT TAYLOR |
|
|
W. Kent Taylor |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 4, 2017 |
By: |
/s/ SCOTT M. COLOSI |
|
|
Scott M. Colosi |
|
|
President, Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
(principal financial officer) |
|
|
(chief accounting officer) |
33