DEF 14A
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the
Registrant þ
Filed by a party other than the
Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
o Preliminary
proxy statement.
o Confidential,
for use of the Commission only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2)).
þ Definitive
proxy statement.
o Definitive
additional materials.
o Soliciting
material under
Rule 14a-12.
THE CENTRAL EUROPE AND RUSSIA FUND, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in
Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy
Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of filing fee (check the appropriate box):
|
|
þ
|
No fee required.
|
|
o
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act
Rules 14a-6(i)(1)
and 0-11.
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11
(set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined):
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
o
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
o
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its
filing.
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE
CENTRAL EUROPE AND RUSSIA FUND, INC.
345 Park
Avenue
New York, New York 10154
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
June 30, 2009
To our Stockholders:
Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
(the Meeting) of The Central Europe and Russia Fund,
Inc., a Maryland corporation (the Fund), will be
held at 10:00 a.m., New York time, on June 30, 2009 at
the New York Marriott East Side Hotel, 525 Lexington Avenue, New
York, New York 10017 for the following purposes:
1. To elect four (4) Directors, each to serve for a
term of three years and until their successors are elected and
qualify.
2. To ratify the appointment by the Audit Committee and the
Board of Directors of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm, as independent auditors for
the fiscal year ending October 31, 2009.
3. To transact such other business as may properly come
before the Meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof.
Only holders of record of Common Stock at the close of business
on May 8, 2009 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at,
this Meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please
contact The Altman Group, Inc., at 1200 Wall Street West,
3rd Floor,
Lyndhurst, New Jersey 07071.
By Order of the Board of Directors
David Goldman
Secretary
Dated: May 20, 2009
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy
Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to be Held on
June 30, 2009: The Proxy Statement is available at
www.shareholdermaterial.com/DF/
Whether or not you expect to attend the Meeting, please sign
the enclosed Proxy Card and promptly return it to the Fund. We
ask your cooperation in mailing in your Proxy Card promptly, so
that the Fund can avoid additional expenses of solicitation of
proxies.
THE
CENTRAL EUROPE AND RUSSIA FUND, INC.
345 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10154
Annual
Meeting of Stockholders
June 30, 2009
This Proxy Statement is furnished by the Board of Directors of
The Central Europe and Russia Fund, Inc. (the Board of
Directors or Board), a Maryland corporation
(the Fund), in connection with the solicitation of
proxies for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the
Meeting) to be held at 10:00 a.m., New York
time, on June 30, 2009 at the New York Marriott East Side
Hotel, 525 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York 10017. The
purpose of the Meeting and the matters to be considered are set
forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of
Stockholders.
If the accompanying Proxy Card is executed properly and
returned, shares represented by it will be voted at the Meeting,
and any postponement or adjournment thereof, in accordance with
the instructions on the Proxy Card. However, if no instructions
are specified, shares will be voted FOR the election of four
(4) directors of the Fund (Directors) nominated
by the Board (Proposal 1) and FOR the ratification of
the appointment by the Audit Committee and the Board of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent public accounting
firm, as independent auditors for the Fund (Proposal 2). A
proxy may be revoked at any time prior to the time it is voted
by written notice to the Secretary of the Fund, by submitting a
subsequently executed and dated proxy or by attending the
Meeting and voting in person.
If a stockholder owns shares of the Fund in violation of
applicable law, including the Investment Company Act of 1940, as
amended (the Investment Company Act), the Fund may
determine that any vote attributable to such shares shall not be
counted, or that such shares will not be counted for quorum
purposes, or both. Under Section 12(d)(1) of the Investment
Company Act, the acquisition of more than 3% of the Funds
common stock by another fund (whether registered, private or
offshore) is unlawful. There is legal uncertainty about the
operation of Section 12(d)(1) and about the Funds
right under federal and state law to invalidate votes cast by
any person whose Fund shares are held in violation of law. The
Fund is prepared, if necessary, to seek judicial resolution of
the uncertainty in any particular case.
The close of business on May 8, 2009 has been fixed as the
record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to
notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting. On that date, the Fund
had 15,263,267.78 shares of Common Stock outstanding and
entitled to vote. Each share will be entitled to one vote on
each matter that comes before the Meeting. It is expected that
the Notice of Annual Meeting, this Proxy Statement and the form
of Proxy Card will first be mailed to stockholders on or about
May 22, 2009.
A quorum is necessary to hold a valid meeting. If stockholders
entitled to cast one-third of all votes entitled to be cast at
the Meeting are present in person or by proxy, a quorum will be
established. The Fund intends to treat properly executed proxies
that are marked abstain and broker non-votes
(defined below) as present for the purposes of determining
whether a quorum has been achieved at the Meeting. Under
Maryland law, abstentions do not constitute a vote
for or against a matter and will be
disregarded in determining the votes cast on an
issue. A broker non-vote occurs when a broker
holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a
particular matter because the broker does not have discretionary
voting power with respect to that matter and has not received
instructions from the beneficial owner.
PROPOSAL 1:
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Funds charter (the Charter) provides that
the Board of Directors be divided into three classes of
Directors serving staggered three-year terms and until their
successors are elected and qualify. The term of office for
Directors in Class III expires at the 2009 Annual Meeting,
Class I at the next succeeding annual meeting and
Class II at the following succeeding annual meeting. Four
Class III nominees are proposed for election in this Proxy
Statement, Dr. Franz Wilhelm Hopp, Mr. Robert H.
Wadsworth, Mr. Werner Walbröl and Mr. Christian
H. Strenger. If elected, each of the four Class III
nominees will serve a three-year term of office until the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders in 2012 and until his respective
successor is elected and qualifies. Dr. Frank Trömel,
a Director in Class III who has served on the Funds
Board of Directors since 2005, is retiring from the Board and,
as a result, is not proposed in this Proxy Statement for
election.
As a result of Dr. Trömels retirement from the
Board, each class of Directors of the Board would not be of
approximately equal size if no further action were taken. Under
the Funds By-laws and the New York Stock Exchange Listed
Company Manual Rule 304 (NYSE Rule 304),
the classes of the Funds board should be of approximately
equal size. Accordingly, the Funds Nominating Committee
nominated Mr. Wadsworth, as a member of the largest class
of Directors of the Fund (Class II), to fill the vacancy
created by Dr. Trömels retirement with
Mr. Wadsworths resignation from Class II
contingent upon his election to the Board as a member of
Class III. If each nominee is elected, each class of
Directors of the Board would be of approximately equal size and
in compliance with the requirements of the Funds Bylaws
and NYSE Rule 304.
Should any vacancy occur on the Board of Directors, the
remaining Directors would be able to fill that vacancy by the
affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining Directors in
office, even if the remaining Directors do not constitute a
quorum. Any Director elected by the Board to fill a vacancy
would hold office until the remainder of the full term of the
class of Directors in which the vacancy occurred and until a
successor is elected and qualifies. If the size of the Board is
increased, additional Directors will be apportioned among the
three classes to make all classes as nearly equal as possible.
Unless authority is withheld, it is the intention of the persons
named in the accompanying form of Proxy Card to vote each Proxy
Card for the election of our four nominees listed above. Each
nominee has indicated that he will continue to serve as a
Director if elected, but if any nominee should be unable to
serve, proxies will be voted for any other person determined by
the persons named in the form of Proxy Card in accordance with
their discretion. The Board of Directors has no reason to
believe that any of the above nominees will be unable to serve
as a Director.
Information
Regarding Directors and Officers
The following tables show certain information about the nominees
for election as Directors and about Directors whose terms will
continue, including beneficial ownership of Common Stock of the
Fund, and about all officers of the Fund. All current directors
resident in the United States own Fund shares. Directors who are
German residents would be subject to adverse German tax
consequences if they owned shares of a fund organized outside of
Germany, such as the Fund, that is not subject to German
regulation or tax reporting.
2
Nominees
Proposed for Election:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class III Directors
|
(Term will Expire in 2009; Nominees for Term Expiring in
2012)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
Portfolios in
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupation(s)
|
|
Fund
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
|
|
Length of
|
|
During Past
|
|
Complex(2)
|
|
|
|
Owned at
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Time
|
|
Five Years
|
|
Overseen by
|
|
Other Directorships
|
|
March 31,
|
Name,
Address(1)
& Age
|
|
with Fund
|
|
Served
|
|
or Longer
|
|
Director
|
|
Held by Director
|
|
2009(3)
|
|
|
Non-Interested
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Franz Wilhelm Hopp, 66
|
|
Director
|
|
Since 2008
|
|
Member of the Board of Management of KarstadtQuelle Pension
Trust e.V. (February 2007-present). Former Member of the Boards
of Management of VICTORIA Holding, VICTORIA Lebensversicherung
AG, VICTORIA Versicherung AG, VICTORIA International, VICTORIA
Ruckversicherung AG and D.A.S. Versicherungs-AG (insurance);
Former Member of the Boards of Management of ERGO Insurance
Group AG, ERGO Europa Beteiligungsgesellscha ft AG, and ERGO
International AG (insurance).
|
|
3
|
|
Director of The European Equity Fund, Inc. (since 2008) and The
New Germany Fund, Inc. (since
1993).(2)
Member of the Administrative Boards of Frankfurter Volksbank
(bank) and HSBC Trinkaus & Burkhardt (bank). Member of the
Advisory boards of Dresdner Bank AG, EnBW Energie
Baden-Wuerttemberg AG (energy). Member of the Supervisory boards
of Ruhrland AG, Essen (car sales), Primion AG, Stetten
(electronic products), Valovis Bank AG (mortgage bank).
|
|
None
|
Robert H. Wadsworth, 69
|
|
Director(4)
|
|
Since 1990
|
|
President, Robert H. Wadsworth Associates, Inc. (consulting
firm) (May 1983 to present).
|
|
132
|
|
Director of The European Equity Fund, Inc. (since 1986) and The
New Germany Fund, Inc. (since
1992),(2)
as well as other funds in the Fund Complex as
indicated.(5)
|
|
4,344
|
Werner Walbröl, 71
|
|
Director
|
|
Since 1990
|
|
Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, The European
American Chamber of Commerce, Inc. (2004-2008). Formerly,
President and Chief Executive Officer, The German American
Chamber of Commerce, Inc. (until 2003).
|
|
3
|
|
Director of The New Germany Fund, Inc. (since 2004) and The
European Equity Fund, Inc. (since
1986).(2)
Director, TÜV Rheinland of North America, Inc. (independent
testing and assessment services). Director, The German American
Chamber of Commerce, Inc. President and Director,
German-American Partnership Program (student exchange programs).
|
|
3,864
|
Interested
Director(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christian H. Strenger, 65
|
|
Director and
Chairman
|
|
Since 1990
|
|
Member of Supervisory Board (since 1999) and formerly Managing
Director (1991-1999) of DWS Investment GmbH (investment
management) (since 1999), a subsidiary of Deutsche Bank AG.
|
|
3
|
|
Director of The European Equity Fund, Inc. (since 1986) and The
New Germany Fund, Inc. (since
1990).(2)
Member, Supervisory Board, Evonik Industries AG (chemical,
utility and property business), Fraport AG (international
airport business) and Hermes Equity Ownership Services Ltd.
(governance advisory).
|
|
500
|
3
Directors
whose terms will continue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class I Directors
|
(Term will Expire in 2010)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
Portfolios in
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupation(s)
|
|
Fund
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
|
|
Length of
|
|
During Past
|
|
Complex(2)
|
|
|
|
Owned at
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Time
|
|
Five Years
|
|
Overseen by
|
|
Other Directorships
|
|
March 31,
|
Name,
Address(1)
& Age
|
|
with Fund
|
|
Served
|
|
or Longer
|
|
Director
|
|
Held by Director
|
|
2009(3)
|
|
Non-Interested
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ambassador Richard R. Burt, 62
|
|
Director
|
|
Since 2000
|
|
Chairman, Diligence LLC (international Information Collection
and risk-management firm) (since 2002). Formerly, Chairman of
the Board, Weirton Steel Corp. (1996-2004); Partner, McKinsey
& Company (consulting firm) (1991-1994); U.S. Ambassador to
the Federal Republic of Germany (1985-1991).
|
|
3
|
|
Director of The New Germany Fund, Inc. (since 2004) and The
European Equity Fund, Inc. (since
2000).(2)
Board Member, IGT, Inc. (gaming technology) (since 1995). Board
Member, HCL technologies Inc. (information technology and
product engineering) (since 1999). Member, Textron Inc.
International Advisory Council (aviation, automotive, industrial
operations and finance) (since 1996). Director, UBS family of
mutual funds (since 1995).
|
|
5,226
|
John H. Cannon, 67
|
|
Director
|
|
Since 2004
|
|
Consultant (since 2002). Vice President and Treasurer, Venator
Group/Footlocker, Inc. (footwear retailer) (1982-2002).
|
|
3
|
|
Director of The European Equity Fund, Inc. (since 2004) and The
New Germany Fund, Inc. (since
1990).(2)
|
|
423
|
Richard Karl Goeltz, 66
|
|
Director
|
|
Since 2008
|
|
Consultant. Retired Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of
American Express Co. (financial services) (1996-2000). Former
Chief Financial Officer of National Westminster Bank Plc.
(1992-1996).
Former Executive Vice President Finance (1986-1991)
and Vice President Finance (1976-1986) of The
Seagram Company Ltd.
|
|
3
|
|
Director of The European Equity Fund, Inc. (since 2008) and The
New Germany Fund, Inc. (since
1990).(2)
Independent Non-Executive Director of Aviva plc (financial
services) and The Warnaco Group, Inc. (apparel). Member of the
Court of Governors of the London School of Economics and
Political Science.
|
|
None
|
|
Interested
Director(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Detlef Bierbaum, 66
|
|
Director
|
|
Since 1990
|
|
Partner of Sal. Oppenheim Jr. & Cie KGaA (investment
management) (over five years).
|
|
3
|
|
Director of The New Germany Fund, Inc. (since 2008) and The
European Equity Fund, Inc. (since
1986).(2)
Member of Supervisory Board, Tertia Handelsbeteiligungsgesel
lschaft mbH (electronics retailer). Member of Supervisory Board,
LVM Landwirtschaftlicher Versicherungsverein (insurance). Member
of Supervisory Board, Monega KAG. Chairman of Supervisory Board,
Oppenheim Kapitalanlagegesellschaf t mbH (investment company).
Chairman of Administrative Board, Oppenheim Prumerica Asset
Management (investment company). Member of the Supervisory Board
of DWS Investment GmbH. Member of the Board of Dundee REIT,
Toronto. Member of the Board of Cologne Re AG (Reinsurance Co.).
Member of the Board of CA Immo AG (real estate).
|
|
None
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class II Directors
|
(Term will Expire in 2011)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
Portfolios in
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupation(s)
|
|
Fund
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
|
|
Length of
|
|
During Past
|
|
Complex(2)
|
|
|
|
Owned at
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Time
|
|
Five Years
|
|
Overseen by
|
|
Other Directorships
|
|
March 31,
|
Name,
Address(1)
& Age
|
|
with Fund
|
|
Served
|
|
or Longer
|
|
Director
|
|
Held by Director
|
|
2009(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Interested
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Kurt W. Bock, 50
|
|
Director
|
|
Since 2004
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of BASF Corporation (since
2007); Member of the Board of Executive Directors and CFO, BASF
Aktiengesellschaft (since 2003; since 2008 BASF SE).
|
|
3
|
|
Director of The New Germany Fund, Inc. (since 2008) and The
European Equity Fund, Inc. (since
2004).(2)
Member of the Supervisory Board of Wintershall AG (since 2006).
Member of the Advisory Board of Gebr. Röchling KG (since
2004). Member of the Board of Deutsches Rechnungslegungs
Standards Committee (DRSC) (since 2003).
|
|
None
|
Dr. Friedbert H. Malt, 67
|
|
Director
|
|
Since 2007
|
|
Vice Chairman and Member of the Executive Committee of NOL
Neptune Orient Lines Ltd., Singapore (NOL) (since
2002). Formerly, Member of the Executive Board of DG Bank (now
DZ Bank), Frankfurt (2001).
|
|
3
|
|
Director of The New Germany Fund, Inc. (since 2007) and The
European Equity Fund, Inc. (since
2007).(2)
Director, TÜV Rheinland of North America, Inc. (independent
testing and assessment services). Member of the Board of NOL
(since 2000).
|
|
None
|
Peter Zühlsdorff, 68
|
|
Director
|
|
Since 2008
|
|
Managing Director of DIH Deutsche Industrie Holding (holding
company) (since 1997). Managing Director of DSO Duales System
Deutschland AG (recycling) (until 2006).
|
|
3
|
|
Director of The European Equity Fund, Inc. (since 2008) and The
New Germany Fund, Inc. (since
1997).(2)
Chairman of the Supervisory Board, Sinn Leffers AG (retail).
Member of the Supervisory Boards of Kaisers Tengelmann AG (food
and specialty retailing) and YOC AG (mobile marketing). Member
of the Advisory Board, Tengelmann Verwaltungs-und
Beteiligungsgesellschaft GmbH (food and specialty retailing) and
Ziegler Film (TV and film production). President of the
Wettbewerbs Centrale (competition center).
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interested
Director(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Bult, 73
|
|
Director
|
|
Since 1990
|
|
Chairman, PaineWebber International (asset management) (since
1985).
|
|
3
|
|
Director of The New Germany Fund, Inc. (since 1990) and The
European Equity Fund, Inc. (since
1986).(2)
Director of The Greater China Fund, Inc. (closed-end fund).
|
|
6,249
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
Officers(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
|
|
Length of
|
|
Principal
|
|
Owned at
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Time
|
|
Occupation(s)
|
|
March 31,
|
Name,
Address(1)
& Age
|
|
with Fund
|
|
Served
|
|
During Past Five Years
|
|
2009(3)
|
|
Michael G. Clark,
43(8)
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Since 2006
|
|
Managing Director, Deutsche Asset Management (since 2006);
President of DWS family of funds; formerly, Director of Fund
Board Relations (2004-2006) and Director of Product Development,
Merrill Lynch Investment Managers (2000-2004).
|
|
None
|
Paul H. Schubert,
46(8)
|
|
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Since 2004
|
|
Managing Director, Deutsche Asset Management (since 2004).
Formerly, Executive Director, Head of Mutual Fund Services and
Treasurer for UBS Family of Funds at UBS Global Asset Management
(1998-2004).
|
|
None
|
David Goldman,
35(8)
|
|
Secretary
|
|
Since 2006
|
|
Director, Deutsche Asset Management (since 2008). Formerly, Vice
President, Deutsche Asset Management (2002-2008).
|
|
None
|
John Millette,
46(8)
|
|
Assistant Secretary
|
|
Since 2006
|
|
Director, Deutsche Asset Management (since 2002).
|
|
None
|
Rita Rubin, 38
|
|
Chief Legal Officer
|
|
Since 2008
|
|
Vice President and Counsel, Deutsche Asset Management (since
2007). Formerly, Vice President, Morgan Stanley Investment
Management Inc. (2004-2007); Attorney, Shearman & Sterling
LLP (2004); Director and Associate General Counsel, UBS Global
Asset Management (US) Inc. (2001-2004).
|
|
None
|
Brett D. Rogers,
33(8)
|
|
Chief Compliance Officer
|
|
Since 2007
|
|
Director, Deutsche Asset Management (since 2008). Formerly,
Chief Compliance Officer, Deutsch Asset Management (Japan) Ltd.
(2006), Vice President Deutsche Asset Management (2005-2008) and
Assistant Vice President, Deutsche Asset Management (2003-2005).
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The mailing address of all directors and officers with respect
to Fund operations is
c/o Deutsche
Investment Management Americas Inc., 345 Park Avenue,
NYC20-2799, New York, New York 10154. |
|
(2) |
|
The Fund Complex includes The European Equity Fund, Inc.
(formerly The Germany Fund, Inc.) and The New Germany Fund,
Inc., which are other closed-end registered investment companies
for which Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc.
(DIMA) acts as manager. It also includes 129 other
open- and closed-end funds advised by DIMA. |
|
(3) |
|
As of March 31, 2009, all Directors and Executive Officers
as a group (19 persons) owned 19,100 shares, which
constitutes less than 1% of the outstanding Common Stock of the
Fund. Share numbers in this Proxy Statement have been rounded to
the nearest whole share. |
|
(4) |
|
As discussed above, Mr. Wadsworth was nominated for
election to Class III as a result of
Dr. Trömels retirement from the Board.
Mr. Wadsworths resignation from Class II is
contingent upon his election as a Class III Director. |
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Wadsworth oversees all 132 funds in the
Fund Complex. |
|
(6) |
|
Indicates Interested Person, as defined in the
Investment Company Act. Mr. Bierbaum is an
interested Director because of his affiliation with
Sal. Oppenheim Jr. & Cie KGaA, which engages in brokerage
transactions with the Fund and other accounts managed by the
Funds investment adviser and manager. |
6
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Bult is an interested Director because of
his affiliation with PaineWebber International, an affiliate of
UBS Securities LLC, a registered broker-dealer.
Mr. Strenger is an interested Director because
of his affiliation with DWS-Deutsche Gesellschaft für
Wertpapiersparen mbH (DWS), a majority-owned
subsidiary of Deutsche Bank AG, and because of his ownership of
Deutsche Bank AG shares. |
|
(7) |
|
Each also serving as an officer of The European Equity Fund,
Inc. (formerly The Germany Fund, Inc.) and The New Germany Fund,
Inc. The officers of the Fund are elected annually by the Board
of Directors at its meeting following the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders. Each of Mr. Clark, Mr. Schubert,
Mr. Millette, Mr. Rogers, Mr. Goldman and
Ms. Rubin also serve as officers of the other Funds in the
Fund Complex. |
|
(8) |
|
Indicates ownership of securities of Deutsche Bank AG either
directly or through Deutsche Banks deferred compensation
plan. |
The following table contains additional information with respect
to the beneficial ownership of equity securities by each
Director or Nominee in the Fund and, on an aggregated basis, in
any registered investment companies overseen by the Director or
Nominee within the same Family of Investment Companies as the
Fund:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
Range of Equity
|
|
|
|
|
Securities in all
|
|
|
|
|
Funds Overseen by
|
|
|
|
|
Director or Nominee
|
|
|
Dollar Range of
|
|
in Family of
|
|
|
Equity Securities in
|
|
Investment
|
Name of Director or Nominee
|
|
the
Fund(1)
|
|
Companies(1),(2)
|
|
Detlef Bierbaum
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
Dr. Kurt W. Bock
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
John Bult
|
|
$50,001-$100,000
|
|
Over $100,000
|
Ambassador Richard R. Burt
|
|
$50,001-$100,000
|
|
Over $100,000
|
John H. Cannon
|
|
$1-$10,000
|
|
$10,001-$50,000
|
Richard Karl Goeltz
|
|
None
|
|
$50,001-$100,000
|
Dr. Franz Wilhelm Hopp
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
Dr. Friedbert H. Malt
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
Christian H. Strenger
|
|
$1-$10,000
|
|
$10,001-$50,000
|
Dr. Frank Trömel
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
Robert H. Wadsworth
|
|
$50,001-$100,000
|
|
Over $100,000
|
Werner Walbröl
|
|
$50,001-$100,000
|
|
Over $100,000
|
Peter Zühlsdorff
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Valuation date is March 31, 2009. Directors who are German
residents would be subject to adverse German tax consequences if
they owned shares of a fund organized outside of Germany, such
as the Fund, that is not subject to German regulation or tax
reporting. |
|
(2) |
|
The Family of Investment Companies consists of the Fund, The
European Equity Fund, Inc. (formerly The Germany Fund, Inc.) and
The New Germany Fund, Inc., which are closed-end funds that
share the same investment adviser and manager and hold
themselves out as related companies. |
The Board of Directors presently has five standing committees
including an audit committee (the Audit Committee),
an advisory committee (the Advisory Committee), an
executive committee (the Executive Committee), a
nominating committee (the Nominating Committee) and
a valuation committee (the Valuation Committee).
The Audit Committee, currently comprising Messrs. Burt,
Cannon, Wadsworth and Walbröl and Drs. Malt and
Trömel, operates pursuant to a written charter. The Audit
Committee charter is not currently available on the Funds
website, but is attached hereto as Annex A. The Audit
Committees organization and responsibilities are contained
in the Audit Committee Report, which is included in this Proxy
Statement, and in its written charter. The members of the Audit
Committee are independent as required by the
independence standards of
Rule 10A-3
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Board of
Directors has determined that each member of the Audit Committee
is financially literate and has determined that each of
Messrs. Cannon and Wadsworth meets the requirements for an
audit committee financial expert under the rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Although
the
7
Board has determined that these individuals meet the
requirements for an audit committee financial expert, their
responsibilities are the same as those of the other audit
committee members. They are not auditors or accountants, do not
perform field work and are not full-time employees.
The SEC has determined that an audit committee member who is
designated as an audit committee financial expert will not be
deemed to be an expert for any purpose as a result
of being identified as an audit committee financial expert. The
Audit Committee met five times during the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2008.
The Advisory Committee, currently comprising
Messrs. Cannon, Goeltz and Wadsworth and
Dr. Trömel, makes recommendations to the full Board
with respect to the Management Agreement between the Fund and
Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc., and the Investment
Advisory Agreement between the Fund and Deutsche Asset
Management International GmbH. The Advisory Committee met one
time during the past fiscal year, in connection with the annual
continuance of those agreements.
The Executive Committee, currently comprising Messrs. Burt,
Cannon, Goeltz, Strenger, Wadsworth and Walbröl, has the
authority to act for the Board on all matters between meetings
of the Board subject to any limitations under applicable state
law. During the past fiscal year the Executive Committee did not
meet.
The Valuation Committee, currently comprising
Messrs. Cannon, Wadsworth and Walbröl and
Dr. Trömel, monitors the valuation of portfolio
securities and other investments. During the past fiscal year,
the Valuation Committee did not meet.
The Nominating Committee is currently comprised of
Messrs. Burt, Cannon, Goeltz, Wadsworth and Walbröl
and Dr. Trömel. The Board has determined that each of
the members of the Nominating Committee is not an
interested person as the term is defined in
Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act. Generally,
the Nominating Committee identifies, evaluates and selects and
nominates, or recommends to the Board of Directors, candidates
for the Board or any committee of the Board. To be eligible for
nomination as a Director a person must, at the time of such
persons nomination, have Relevant Experience and Country
Knowledge and must not have any Conflict of Interest, as those
terms are defined in the Funds Bylaws. The relevant
portions of the Funds Bylaws describing these requirements
are included as Annex C. The Nominating Committee may also
take into account additional factors listed in the Nominating
Committee Charter, which generally relate to the nominees
industry knowledge, business experience, education, ethical
reputation, special skills, ability to work well in group
settings and the ability to qualify as an independent
director.
The Nominating Committee will consider nominee candidates
properly submitted by stockholders in accordance with applicable
law, the Funds Charter or Bylaws, resolutions of the Board
and the qualifications and procedures set forth in the
Nominating Committee Charter set forth in Annex B and this
proxy statement. A stockholder or group of stockholders seeking
to submit a nominee candidate (i) must have beneficially
owned at least 5% of the Funds common stock for at least
two years, (ii) may submit only one nominee candidate for
any particular meeting of stockholders, and (iii) may
submit a nominee candidate for only an annual meeting or other
meeting of stockholders at which directors will be elected. The
stockholder or group of stockholders must provide notice of the
proposed nominee pursuant to the requirements found in the
Funds Bylaws. Generally, this notice must be received not
less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the
first anniversary of the date of mailing of the notice for the
preceding years annual meeting. Such notice shall include
the specific information required by the Funds Bylaws. The
relevant portions describing these requirements are included as
Annex C. The Nominating Committee will evaluate nominee
candidates properly submitted by stockholders on the same basis
as it considers and evaluates candidates recommended by other
sources. The Nominating Committee met two times during the past
fiscal year.
All members on each of the five committees of the Board are not
interested persons as the term is defined in the
Investment Company Act (except that Mr. Strenger, an
interested person, is a member of the Executive Committee).
During the past fiscal year, the Board of Directors had four
regular meetings. Each incumbent Director who served as a
Director during the past fiscal year, except Dr. Bock,
attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the
Board and meetings of Board Committees on which that Director
served. The Board has a policy that encourages Directors to
attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to the extent that
travel to the Annual
8
Meeting of Stockholders is reasonable for that Director. Two
Directors attended the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
To communicate with the Board of Directors or an individual
Director of the Fund, a stockholder must send a written
communication to the Funds principal office at 345 Park
Avenue, NYC20-2799, New York, New York 10154
(c/o The
Central Europe and Russia Fund, Inc.), addressed to (i) the
Board of Directors of the Fund or an individual Director, and
(ii) the Secretary of the Fund. The Secretary of the Fund
will direct the correspondence to the appropriate parties.
The Fund pays each of its Directors who is not an interested
person of the Fund, of the investment adviser or of the manager
an annual fee of $7,500 plus $750 for each Board and Committee
meeting attended. Each such Director who is also a Director of
The European Equity Fund, Inc. (formerly The Germany Fund, Inc.)
or The New Germany Fund, Inc. also receives the same annual and
per-meeting fees for services as a Director of each such fund.
No Director of all three funds is paid for attending more than
two funds board and committee meetings when meetings of
the three funds are held concurrently, and no such Director
receives more than the annual fee of two funds. Each of the
Fund, The European Equity Fund, Inc. (formerly The Germany Fund,
Inc.) and The New Germany Fund, Inc. reimburses the Directors
(except for those employed by the Deutsche Bank Group) for
travel expenses in connection with Board meetings. These three
funds, together with 129 other open- and closed-end funds
advised by wholly owned entities of the Deutsche Bank Group in
the United States, represent the entire Fund Complex within
the meaning of the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC.
The following table sets forth (a) the aggregate
compensation from the Fund for the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2008, and (b) the total compensation from
each fund in the Fund Complex that includes the Fund, for
the 2008 fiscal year of each such fund, (i) for each
Director or Nominee for Director who is not an interested person
of the Fund, and (ii) for all such Directors as a group:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total Compensation
|
|
Name of Director
|
|
from Fund
|
|
|
from Fund Complex
|
|
|
Dr. Kurt W. Bock
|
|
$
|
8,250
|
|
|
$
|
16,500
|
|
Ambassador Richard R. Burt
|
|
$
|
11,917
|
|
|
$
|
32,500
|
|
John H. Cannon
|
|
$
|
11,791
|
|
|
$
|
32,500
|
|
Richard Karl Goeltz
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
13,750
|
|
Dr. Franz Wilhelm Hopp
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
10,500
|
|
Dr. Friedbert H. Malt
|
|
$
|
7,018
|
|
|
$
|
25,018
|
|
Dr. Frank Trömel
|
|
$
|
10,666
|
|
|
$
|
29,500
|
|
Robert H. Wadsworth
|
|
$
|
11,333
|
|
|
$
|
31,000
|
|
Werner Walbröl
|
|
$
|
12,250
|
|
|
$
|
32,500
|
|
Peter Zühlsdorff
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
10,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
73,225
|
|
|
$
|
234,268
|
|
No compensation is paid by the Fund to Directors who are
interested persons of the Fund or of any entity of the Deutsche
Bank Group or to officers.
THE BOARD
UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR
PROPOSAL 1.
Required Vote. Provided a quorum has been
established, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes
entitled to be cast at the Meeting is required for the election
of each Director. For purposes of the election of Directors,
abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as a
vote against a Director.
9
PROPOSAL 2:
RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Audit Committee has approved PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (the
Firm or PwC), an independent registered
public accounting firm, as independent auditors for the Fund for
the fiscal year ending October 31, 2009. A majority of
members of the Board of Directors, including a majority of the
members of the Board of Directors who are not
interested Directors (as defined in the Investment
Company Act) of the Fund, have ratified the appointment of PwC
as the Funds independent auditors for that fiscal year.
Based principally on representations from the Firm, the Fund
knows of no direct financial or material indirect financial
interest of such Firm in the Fund. That Firm, or a predecessor
firm, has served as the independent auditors for the Fund since
inception.
Neither our Charter nor Bylaws require that the stockholders
ratify the appointment of PwC as our independent auditors. We
are doing so because we believe it is a matter of good corporate
practice. If the stockholders do not ratify the appointment, the
Audit Committee and the Board of Directors will reconsider
whether or not to retain PwC, but may retain such independent
auditors. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit
Committee and the Board of Directors in their discretion may
change the appointment at any time during the year if they
determine that such change would be in the best interests of the
Fund and its stockholders. It is intended that the persons named
in the accompanying form of proxy will vote for PwC. A
representative of PwC will be present at the Meeting and will
have the opportunity to make a statement and is expected to be
available to answer appropriate questions concerning the
Funds financial statements.
THE BOARD
UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR
PROPOSAL 2.
Required Vote. Provided a quorum has been
established, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes
cast at the Meeting is required for the ratification of the
appointment by the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors of
PwC as independent auditors for the Fund for the fiscal year
ending October 31, 2009. For purposes of Proposal 2,
abstentions will have no effect on the result of the vote.
Information
With Respect To The Funds Independent Auditors
The following table shows fees paid to PwC by the Fund during
the Funds two most recent fiscal years: (i) for audit
and non-audit services provided to the Fund, and (ii) for
engagements for non-audit services pre-approved by the Audit
Committee for the Funds manager and investment adviser and
certain entities controlling, controlled by, or under common
control with the manager and investment adviser that provide
ongoing services to the Fund (collectively, the Adviser
Entities), which engagements relate directly to the
operations and financial reporting of the Fund. The Audit
Committee of each board will review, at least annually, whether
PwCs receipt of non-audit fees from the Fund, the
Funds manager, the Funds investment adviser and all
Adviser Entities is compatible with maintaining PwCs
independence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit
Fees(1)
|
|
|
Audit Related
Fees(2)
|
|
|
Tax
Fees(3)
|
|
|
All Other
Fees(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adviser
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adviser
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adviser
|
|
|
|
Fund
|
|
|
Fund
|
|
|
Entities
|
|
|
Fund
|
|
|
Entities
|
|
|
Fund
|
|
|
Entities
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
86,500
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
9,630
|
|
|
$
|
19,000
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
90,000
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
58,500
|
|
|
$
|
8,806
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Audit Fees are the aggregate fees billed for
professional services for the audit of the Funds annual
financial statements and services provided in connection with
statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. |
|
(2) |
|
Audit Related Fees are the aggregate fees billed for
assurance and related services reasonably related to the
performance of the audit or review of financial statements and
are not reported under Audit Fees. |
|
(3) |
|
Tax Fees are the aggregate fees billed for
professional services for tax advice, tax compliance and tax
planning. |
|
(4) |
|
All Other Fees are the aggregate fees billed for
products and services other than Audit Fees,
Audit Related Fees and Tax Fees. |
10
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and
Procedures. Generally, the Audit Committee must
pre-approve (i) all services to be performed for the Fund
by the Funds independent auditors and (ii) all
non-audit services to be performed by the Funds
independent auditors for the Funds investment adviser or
any Adviser Entities with respect to operations and financial
reporting of the Fund. Any member of the Audit Committee may
pre-approve any audit or non-audit services to be performed by
the independent auditors, provided that any such approvals are
presented to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
The auditors shall report to the Audit Committee at each of its
regular meetings all audit or non-audit services to the Fund and
all non-audit services to the Adviser Entities that relate
directly to the Funds operations and financial reporting
initiated since the last such report was rendered, including a
general description of the services and projected fees and the
means by which such services were approved by the Audit
Committee.
All Non-Audit Fees. The table below shows the
aggregate non-audit fees billed by PwC for services rendered to
the Fund and to the Adviser Entities that provide ongoing
services to the Fund, whether or not such engagements relate
directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Fund,
for the two most recent fiscal years for the Fund.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Non-Audit Fees
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
628,630
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
33,806
|
|
Audit
Committee Report
The purposes of the Audit Committee are 1) to assist the
Board of Directors in its oversight of (i) the integrity of
the Funds financial statements; (ii) the Funds
compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;
(iii) the independent auditors qualifications and
independence; and (iv) the performance of the independent
auditors; and 2) to prepare this report. Each Member of the
Audit Committee is independent, as required by the
independence standards of
Rule 10A-3
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Audit Committee
operates pursuant to a written charter. As set forth in the
Audit Committee Charter, management of the Fund and applicable
service providers are responsible for the preparation,
presentation and integrity of the Funds financial
statements and for the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting. Management and applicable service providers
are responsible for maintaining appropriate accounting and
financial reporting principles and policies and internal control
over financial reporting and other procedures that provide for
compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and
regulations. The independent auditors are responsible for
planning and carrying out a proper audit of the Funds
annual financial statements and expressing an opinion as to
their conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
In the performance of its oversight function, the Audit
Committee has considered and discussed the audited financial
statements with management and the independent auditors of the
Fund. The Audit Committee has also discussed with the
independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by
Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication
with Audit Committees, as currently in effect. The Audit
Committee has also considered whether the provision of any
non-audit services not pre-approved by the Audit Committee
provided by the Funds independent auditors to the
Funds investment adviser, manager or to any entity
controlling, controlled by or under common control with the
Funds investment adviser or manager that provides ongoing
services to the Fund is compatible with maintaining the
auditors independence. Finally, the Audit Committee has
received the written disclosures and the letter from the
independent auditors required by Independence Standards Board
Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions with Audit
Committees, as currently in effect, and has discussed with
the auditors their independence.
The members of the Audit Committee are not full-time employees
of the Fund and are not performing the functions of auditors or
accountants. As such, it is not the duty or responsibility of
the Audit Committee or its members to conduct field
work or other types of auditing or accounting reviews or
procedures or to set auditor independence standards. Members of
the Audit Committee necessarily rely on the information provided
to them by management and the independent auditors. Accordingly,
the Audit Committees considerations and discussions
referred to above do not assure that the audit of the
Funds financial statements has been carried out in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, that the
financial statements are presented in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles or that the Funds auditors
are in fact independent.
11
Based upon the reports and discussions described in this report,
and subject to the limitations on the role and responsibilities
of the Audit Committee referred to above and in the Charter, the
Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors of the
Fund that the audited financial statements of the Fund be
included in the Funds annual report to stockholders for
the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008.
Submitted by the Audit Committee
of the Funds Board of Directors
Richard R. Burt
John H. Cannon
Friedbert H. Malt
Frank Trömel
Robert H. Wadsworth
Werner Walbröl
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
As of March 31, 2009, no person, to the knowledge of
management, owned of record or beneficially more than 5% of the
outstanding Common Stock of the Fund, other than as set forth
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
Nature of
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Beneficial Ownership
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
City of London Investment Group PLC/City of London Investment
Management Company
Limited(1)
77 Gracechurch Street, London, EC3V 0AS England
|
|
|
3,833,372 shares
|
|
|
|
24.17
|
%
|
Lazard Asset Management
LLC(2)
30 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, NY 10112
|
|
|
1,329,945 shares
|
|
|
|
8.29
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This information is based exclusively on information provided by
such entity on Schedule 13D filed with respect to the Fund
on March 27, 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
This information is based exclusively on information provided by
such entity on Schedule 13G filed with respect to the Fund
on February 10, 2009. |
ADDRESS
OF INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGER
The principal office of Deutsche Asset Management International
GmbH, the Funds investment adviser, is located at Mainzer
Landstrasse
178-190,
D-60327 Frankfurt am Main, Federal Republic of Germany. The
corporate office of Deutsche Investment Management Americas
Inc., the Funds manager, is located at 345 Park Avenue,
New York, New York 10154.
SECTION 16(a)
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP
REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Based on a review of reports filed by the Funds directors
and executive officers, the investment adviser, officers and
directors of the investment adviser, affiliated persons of the
investment adviser and beneficial holders of 10% or more of the
Funds outstanding stock, and written representations by
the Reporting Persons that no year-end reports were required for
such persons, all filings required by Section 16(a) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2008 were timely, except that
Messrs. Bult, Burt and Walbröl each filed a
Form 4 late. Each Director has since corrected his omission
by making the necessary filings.
12
OTHER
MATTERS
No business other than as set forth herein is expected to come
before the Meeting, but should any other matter requiring a vote
of stockholders properly come before the Meeting, including any
question as to an adjournment of the Meeting, the persons named
in the enclosed Proxy Card will vote thereon according to their
discretion. Abstentions and broker non-votes shall have no
effect on the outcome of a vote to adjourn the Meeting.
STOCKHOLDER
PROPOSALS
In order for stockholder proposals otherwise satisfying the
eligibility requirements of SEC
Rule 14a-8
to be considered for inclusion in the Funds proxy
statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting, the proposals must be
received at The Central Europe and Russia Fund, Inc.,
c/o Deutsche
Investment Management Americas, 345 Park Avenue, NYC20-2799, New
York, New York 10154, Attention: Secretary, on or before
January 22, 2010.
In addition, the Funds Bylaws currently provide that if a
stockholder desires to bring business (including director
nominations) before the 2010 Annual Meeting that is or is not
the subject of a proposal timely submitted for inclusion in the
Funds proxy statement, written notice of such business as
prescribed in the Bylaws must be delivered to the Funds
Secretary, at the principal executive offices of the Fund,
between January 22, 2010 and February 21, 2010. For
additional requirements, the stockholder may refer to the
Bylaws, a current copy of which may be obtained without charge
upon request from the Funds Secretary. If the Fund does
not receive timely notice pursuant to the Bylaws, the proposal
may be excluded from consideration at the meeting, regardless of
any earlier notice provided in accordance with SEC
Rule 14a-8.
EXPENSES
OF PROXY SOLICITATION
The cost of preparing, assembling and mailing material in
connection with this solicitation will be borne by the Fund. In
addition to the use of mails, proxies may be solicited
personally by regular employees of the Fund or the manager or by
telephone or telegraph. Brokerage houses, banks and other
fiduciaries may be requested to forward proxy solicitation
materials to their principals to obtain authorization for the
execution of proxies, and they will be reimbursed by the Fund
for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in this connection. The Fund
has also made arrangements with The Altman Group, Inc. to assist
in the solicitation of proxies, if called upon by the Fund, at
an estimated fee of $6,225 plus reimbursement of normal expenses.
ANNUAL
REPORT DELIVERY
The Fund will furnish, without charge, a copy of its annual
report for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008 and the
most recent semi-annual report, if any, to any stockholder upon
request. Such requests should be directed by mail to The Central
Europe and Russia Fund, Inc.,
c/o Deutsche
Investment Management Americas, 345 Park Avenue,
NYC20-2799, New York, New York 10154 or by telephone to
1-800-437-6269.
Annual reports are also available on the Funds web site:
www.germanyfund.com.
David Goldman
Secretary
Dated: May 20, 2009
Stockholders who do not expect to be present at the Meeting
and who wish to have their shares voted are requested to date
and sign the enclosed Proxy Card and return it to the Fund as
soon as practicable.
13
ANNEX A
THE
CENTRAL EUROPE AND RUSSIA FUND, INC.
(the Company)
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
(Amended and Restated as of October 31, 2003; further
amended on April 23, 2004; and further amended on
April 25, 2008)
I. Composition of the Audit Committee: The Audit Committee
shall be comprised of at least three directors, each of whom
shall satisfy the independence requirements of
Rule 10A-3
under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.1
The Board of Directors (the Board) shall determine
that each member is financially literate, and that
at least one member of the Audit Committee has accounting
or related financial management expertise, as such
qualifications are interpreted by the Board in its business
judgment, and whether any member of the Audit Committee is an
audit committee financial expert, as defined by the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). If the
Board has determined that a member of the Audit Committee is an
audit committee financial expert, it may presume that such
member has accounting or related financial management expertise.
No director may serve as a member of the Audit Committee if such
director serves on the audit committees of more than two other
public companies unless the Board determines that such
simultaneous service would not impair the ability of such
director to effectively serve on the Audit Committee. The Board
has determined that simultaneous service on the audit committees
of The New Germany Fund, Inc. and The European Equity Fund, Inc.
(the Related Funds) would not impair a
directors ability to effectively serve on the Audit
Committee because, among other reasons, the boards of directors
and audit committees of all three closed-end funds generally
meet concurrently, have substantial director overlaps, have
common service providers, and have many operating, financial
reporting and accounting issues in common. The Board has further
determined that service on the Audit Committee of the Company
and the audit committees of the Related Funds should be
considered service on a single public company audit committee
for purposes of the three-audit committee limitation.
Members shall be appointed by the Board, and shall serve at the
pleasure of the Board and for such term or terms as the Board
may determine.
The Board shall designate one member of the Audit Committee as
its chairperson.
II. Purposes of the Audit Committee: The purposes of the
Audit Committee are to:
1. assist Board oversight of (i) the integrity of the
Companys financial statements, (ii) the
Companys compliance with legal and regulatory
requirements, (iii) the independent auditors
qualifications and independence, and (iv) the performance
of the independent auditors; and
2. prepare the report required to be prepared by the Audit
Committee pursuant to the rules of the SEC for inclusion in the
Companys annual proxy statement.
The function of the Audit Committee is oversight. The management
of the Company, including the service providers so contractually
obligated, is responsible for the preparation, presentation and
integrity of the Companys financial statements and for the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
Management and applicable service providers are responsible for
maintaining appropriate accounting and financial reporting
principles and policies and internal control over financial
reporting and other procedures that provide for compliance with
accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. The
independent auditors are responsible for planning and carrying
out a proper audit of the Companys annual financial
statements and other procedures. In fulfilling their
responsibilities hereunder, it is recognized that members of the
Audit Committee are not full-time employees of the Company and
are not, and do not represent themselves to be, performing the
1 In
order to satisfy
Rule 10A-3
of the 1934 Act, a member of the Audit Committee may not
(1) accept directly or indirectly any consulting, advisory
or other compensatory fee from the Company other than
(a) directors fees and (b) any other regular
benefits that other directors receive, or (2) be an
interested person of the Company as such term is
defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act
of 1940.
A-1
functions of auditors or accountants. As such, it is not the
duty or responsibility of the Audit Committee or its members to
conduct field work or other types of auditing or
accounting reviews or procedures or to set auditor independence
standards, and each member of the Audit Committee shall be
entitled to rely on (i) the integrity of those persons and
organizations within and outside the Company from which it
receives information, (ii) the accuracy of the financial
and other information provided to the Audit Committee by such
persons or organizations absent actual knowledge to the contrary
(which shall be promptly reported to the Board of Directors),
and (iii) representations made by management as to any
non-audit services provided by the auditors to the Company, to
the Companys investment manager or investment adviser or
any entity in a control relationship with the investment manager
or investment adviser, or to the Companys custodian
(including sub-custodians).
The independent auditors shall submit to the Audit Committee
annually a formal written statement (the Auditors
Statement) describing: the auditors internal
quality-control procedures; any material issues raised by the
most recent internal quality-control review or peer review of
the auditors, or by any inquiry or investigation by governmental
or professional authorities, within the preceding five years,
respecting one or more independent audits carried out by the
auditors, and any steps taken to deal with any such issues; and
(to assess the auditors independence) all relationships
between the independent auditors and the (a) Company,
(b) the Companys investment manager or investment
adviser, and (c) any entity in a control relationship with
the investment manager or investment adviser, whether or not it
provides services to the Company, and including at least the
matters set forth in Independence Standards Board No. 1.
The description of relationships should include a description of
the non-audit services, including the fees associated therewith,
that were not pre-approved by the Companys Audit Committee.
The independent auditors shall submit to the Audit Committee
annually a formal written statement of the fees billed in each
of the last two fiscal years for each of the following
categories of services rendered by the independent auditors:
(i) the audit of the Companys annual financial
statements or services that are normally provided by the
independent auditors in connection with statutory and regulatory
filings or engagements; (ii) assurance and related services
not included in clause (i) that are reasonably related to
the performance of the audit or review of the Companys
financial statements, in the aggregate and by each service;
(iii) tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning services,
in the aggregate and by each service; and (iv) all other
products and services rendered by the independent auditors, in
the aggregate and by each service. The statement as to (ii),
(iii) and (iv) should include (and separately
disclose) fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for
the indicated services to (a) the Company, (b) the
Companys investment manager and investment adviser, and
(c) any entity in a control relationship with the
investment manager or investment adviser that provides ongoing
services to the Company.
III. Meetings of the Audit Committee: The Audit Committee
shall meet semi-annually or more frequently if circumstances
dictate, to discuss with management and the independent auditor
the annual audited financial statements and to address the
matters set forth in Article IV. The Audit Committee should
meet separately at least annually with each of management and
the independent auditors to discuss any matters that the Audit
Committee or any of these persons or firms believe should be
discussed privately. The Audit Committee may request any officer
or employee of the Company or any service provider, outside
counsel to the Company or the independent directors or the
Companys independent auditors to attend a meeting of the
Audit Committee or to meet with any members of, or consultants
to, the Audit Committee. Members of the Audit Committee may
participate in a meeting of the Audit Committee by means of
conference call or similar communications equipment by means of
which all persons participating in the meeting can hear each
other.
IV. Duties and Powers of the Audit Committee: To carry out
its purposes, the Audit Committee shall have the following
duties and powers:
1. with respect to the independent auditors,
(i) to be directly responsible for the appointment,
retention, compensation, and oversight of the work of the
independent auditors (including the resolution of disagreements
between management and the independent auditors regarding
financial reporting), who shall report directly to the Audit
Committee; provided that the auditor appointment shall be
subject to ratification by the Board;
A-2
(ii) to be directly responsible for the appointment,
retention, compensation and oversight of the work of any
registered public accounting firm, other than the independent
auditors, engaged for the purpose of preparing or issuing an
audit report or to perform audit, review or attestation
services, which firm shall report directly to the Audit
Committee;
(iii) to pre-approve, or to adopt appropriate procedures to
pre-approve, all audit and non-audit services to be provided by
the independent auditors, including applicable non-audit
services provided to the Companys investment manager and
investment adviser and any entity in a control relationship with
the investment manager or investment adviser that provides
ongoing services to the Company;
(iv) to ensure that the independent auditors prepare and
deliver annually an Auditors Statement (it being
understood that the independent auditors are responsible for the
accuracy and completeness of this Statement), and to discuss
with the independent auditors any relationships or services
disclosed in this Statement that may impact the quality of audit
services or the objectivity and independence of the
Companys independent auditors;
(v) to obtain from the independent auditors in connection
with any audit a timely report relating to the Companys
annual audited financial statements describing all critical
accounting policies and practices used, all alternative
treatments of financial information within generally accepted
accounting principles that have been discussed with management,
ramifications of the use of such alternative disclosures and
treatments, and the treatment preferred by the independent
auditors, and any material written communications between the
independent auditors and management, such as any
management letter or schedule of unadjusted
differences;
(vi) to review and evaluate the qualifications, performance
and independence of the independent auditors, as well as the
lead partner of the independent auditors;
(vii) to discuss with management the timing and process for
implementing the rotation of the lead audit partner, the
concurring partner and any other active audit engagement team
partner and consider whether there should be a regular rotation
of the audit firm itself; and
(viii) to take into account the opinions of management in
assessing the independent auditors qualifications,
performance and independence;
2. with respect to financial reporting principles and
policies and internal audit controls and procedures,
(i) to advise management, relevant service providers and
the independent auditors that they are expected to provide or
cause to be provided to the Audit Committee a timely analysis of
significant financial reporting issues and practices;
(ii) to consider any reports or communications (and
managements
and/or
applicable service providers responses thereto) submitted
to the Audit Committee by the independent auditors required by
or referred to in SAS 61 (as codified by AU Section 380),
as may be modified or supplemented, including reports and
communications related to:
|
|
|
|
|
deficiencies noted in the audit in the design or operation of
internal controls;
|
|
|
|
consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit;
|
|
|
|
detection of illegal acts;
|
|
|
|
the independent auditors responsibility under generally
accepted auditing standards;
|
|
|
|
any restriction on audit scope;
|
|
|
|
significant accounting policies;
|
|
|
|
significant issues discussed with the national office respecting
auditing or accounting issues presented by the engagement;
|
|
|
|
management judgments and accounting estimates;
|
A-3
|
|
|
|
|
any accounting adjustments arising from the audit that were
noted or proposed by the auditors but were passed (as immaterial
or otherwise);
|
|
|
|
the responsibility of the independent auditor for other
information in documents containing audited financial statements;
|
|
|
|
disagreements with management;
|
|
|
|
consultation by management with other accountants;
|
|
|
|
major issues discussed with management prior to retention of the
independent auditors;
|
|
|
|
difficulties encountered with management in performing the audit;
|
|
|
|
the independent auditors judgments about the
preferability, not just acceptability, of the Companys
accounting principles; and
|
|
|
|
reviews, if any, of interim financial information conducted in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards by the
independent auditors;
|
(iii) to meet with management, the independent auditors
and, if appropriate, the relevant service providers:
|
|
|
|
|
to discuss the scope of the annual audit;
|
|
|
|
to discuss the annual audited financial statements and any
interim financial statements;
|
|
|
|
to discuss any significant matters arising from any audit,
including any audit problems or difficulties, whether raised by
management, relevant service providers or the independent
auditors, relating to the Companys financial statements;
|
|
|
|
to discuss any difficulties the independent auditors encountered
in the course of the audit, including any restrictions on their
activities or access to requested information and any
significant disagreements with management;
|
|
|
|
to discuss any management or internal
control letter issued, or proposed to be issued, by the
independent auditors to the Company;
|
|
|
|
to review the form of opinion the independent auditors propose
to render to the Board and stockholders;
|
|
|
|
to discuss, as appropriate: (a) any major issues regarding
accounting principles and financial statement presentations,
including any significant changes in the Companys
selection or application of accounting principles, and major
issues as to the adequacy of the Companys internal
controls and any special audit steps adopted in light of
material control deficiencies; (b) analyses prepared by
management
and/or the
independent auditors setting forth significant financial
reporting issues and judgments made in connection with the
preparation of the financial statements, including analyses of
the effects of alternative GAAP methods on the financial
statements; and (c) the effect of regulatory and accounting
initiatives on the financial statements of the Company;
|
|
|
|
to discuss allocations of expenses between the Company and other
entities;
|
|
|
|
to discuss the Companys compliance with Subchapter M of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended;
|
|
|
|
to discuss with management and the independent auditors their
respective procedures to assess the representativeness of
securities prices provided by external pricing services; and
|
|
|
|
to discuss with independent auditors their conclusions as to the
reasonableness of procedures employed to determine the fair
value of securities for which readily available market
quotations are not available, managements adherence to
such procedures and the adequacy of supporting documentation;
|
(iv) to inquire of the Companys chief executive
officer and chief financial officer as to the existence of any
significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial
A-4
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information and any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or service providers that have a
significant role in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting;
(v) to discuss with management and any relevant service
providers the semi-annual financial statements at the next Audit
Committee meeting following their issuance;
(vi) to discuss guidelines and policies governing the
process by which management of the Company and the relevant
service providers of the Company assess and manage the
Companys exposure to risk, and to discuss the
Companys most significant financial risk exposures and the
steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures;
(vii) to obtain from the independent auditors assurance
that the audit was conducted in a manner consistent with
Section 10A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, which sets forth certain procedures to be followed in
any audit of financial statements required under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934;
(viii) to discuss with the respective counsel for the
Company and the investment manager any significant legal,
compliance or regulatory matters that may have a material effect
on the financial statements or the Companys business,
financial statements or compliance policies, including material
notices to or inquiries received from governmental agencies;
(ix) to establish procedures for the receipt, retention and
treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding
accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters,
and for the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of
the Company, the investment manager or investment adviser, or
employees of any other service provider that provides accounting
related services to the Company, of concerns regarding
questionable accounting or auditing matters;
(x) to consider any reports concerning material violations
submitted to the Audit Committee by the Companys Chief
Legal Officer, counsel for service providers or outside counsel
pursuant to the SEC attorney professional responsibility rules,
any service providers attorney reporting policy (which may
be broader than the SEC rules) or otherwise and determine what
action or response is necessary or appropriate; and
(xi) to review policies of the investment manager and
investment adviser, and any entity within the Companys
Investment Company Complex, as such term is defined in
Rule 2-01(f)(14)
of
Regulation S-X,
for hiring employees or former employees of the independent
auditors whose responsibilities are to include an accounting
role or financial reporting oversight role with respect to the
Company;
3. with respect to reporting, recommendations and other
matters,
(i) to provide advice to the Board in selecting the
principal accounting officer of the Company;
(ii) to prepare any report or other disclosures, including
any recommendation of the Audit Committee, required by the rules
of the SEC to be included in the Companys annual proxy
statement;
(iii) to review this charter at least annually and
recommend any changes to the full Board;
(iv) to report its activities to the full Board on a
regular basis and to make such recommendations with respect to
the above and other matters as the Audit Committee may deem
necessary or appropriate; and
(v) to prepare and review with the Board an annual
performance evaluation of the Audit Committee, which evaluation
must compare the performance of the Audit Committee with the
requirements of this charter. The performance evaluation by the
Audit Committee shall be conducted in such manner as the Audit
Committee deems appropriate. The report to the Board may take
the form of an oral report by the chairperson of the Audit
Committee or any other member of the Audit Committee designated
by the Audit Committee to make this report.
4. with respect to such other matters as may be delegated
to the Audit Committee from time to time by the Board, to
perform the duties and exercise the powers conferred to the
Board in connection with that delegation.
A-5
V. Delegation to Subcommittee: The Audit Committee may, in
its discretion, delegate all or a portion of its duties and
responsibilities to a subcommittee of the Audit Committee. The
Board and the Audit Committee have authorized any member of the
Audit Committee to pre-approve any audit or non-audit services
to be performed by the independent auditors, provided that any
such approvals are presented to the Audit Committee at its next
scheduled meeting.
VI. Resources and Authority of the Audit Committee: The
Audit Committee shall have the resources and authority
appropriate to discharge its duties and responsibilities,
including the authority to select, retain, terminate, and
approve the fees and other retention terms of special or
independent counsel, accountants or other experts and advisers,
as it deems necessary or appropriate, without seeking approval
of the Board or management. The Company shall provide for
appropriate funding, as determined by the Audit Committee, in
its capacity as a committee of the Board, for payment of
compensation to the independent auditors and any other public
accounting firm engaged for the purpose of preparing or issuing
an audit report or performing other audit, review or attest
services for the Company.
A-6
ANNEX B
THE
CENTRAL EUROPE AND RUSSIA FUND, INC.
(the Fund)
NOMINATING
COMMITTEE CHARTER
(Adopted as of April 23, 2004)
The Board of Directors (the Board) of the Fund has
adopted this Charter to govern the activities of the Nominating
Committee (the Committee) of the Board.
Statement
of Purposes and Responsibilities
The primary purposes and responsibilities of the Committee are:
(i) to identify individuals qualified to become members of
the Board in the event that a position is vacated or created;
(ii) to consider all candidates proposed to become members
of the Board, subject to applicable law, the Funds
Articles of Incorporation or By-laws, resolutions of the Board
and the procedures and policies set forth in this Charter and
the Funds annual proxy statement;
(iii) to select and nominate, or recommend for nomination
by the Board, candidates for election as Directors;
(iv) in the case of a director nominee to fill a Board
vacancy created by an increase in the size of the Board, to make
a recommendation to the Board as to the class of directors in
which the individual should serve;
(v) to make recommendations to the Board from time to time
as to any changes that the Committee believes to be desirable to
the provisions of the Funds By-laws regarding minimum
standards and qualifications for service as a Director on the
Board or to any charter of committees of the Board regarding
minimum standards and qualifications for service as a committee
member, and to recommend to the Board, or to set, any additional
standards or qualifications considered necessary or desirable
for service as a Director on the Board or as a member of a
committee of the Board;
(vi) to identify Board members qualified to fill vacancies
on any committee of the Board, taking into account any
qualifications or other criteria set forth in the charter of
that committee, and to recommend that the Board appoint the
identified member or members to that committee;
(vii) to make recommendations to the Board from time to
time as to changes that the Committee believes to be desirable
to the size of the Board or any committee thereof;
(viii) to review with counsel, at least annually, each
Directors affiliations and relationships for purposes of
determining whether such Director is a person who is not an
interested person of the Fund, as defined in
Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as
amended.
(ix) to assist management in the preparation of the
disclosure in the Funds annual proxy statement regarding
the operations of the Committee; and
(x) to perform any other duties or responsibilities
expressly delegated to the Committee by the Board from time to
time relating to the nomination of Board or committee members.
Organization
and Governance
The Committee shall consist solely of three or more members of
the Board. The Committee must consist entirely of Board members
who are not interested persons of the Fund, as
defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act
of 1940, as amended (Independent Directors). Members
shall serve at the pleasure of the Board and for such term or
terms as the Board may determine.
One or more members of the Committee may be designated by the
Board as the Committees chairperson or co-chairperson, as
the case may be.
The Committee shall meet at least once a year at a time and
place determined by the Committee chairperson, with further
meetings to occur, or actions to be taken by unanimous written
consent, when deemed necessary or
B-1
desirable by the Committee or its chairperson. Members of the
Committee may participate in a meeting of the Committee by means
of conference call or similar communications equipment by means
of which all persons participating in the meeting can hear each
other. Committee meetings shall be held in accordance with the
Funds By-laws.
Criteria
for Director Nominees
To be eligible for nomination as a Director a person must, at
the time of such persons nomination, have Relevant
Experience and Country Knowledge, as defined in the Funds
By-laws, and must not have any Conflict of Interest, as defined
in the Funds By-laws. Whether a proposed nominee satisfies
the foregoing qualifications shall be determined by the
Committee in its sole discretion. The Committee may also take
into account a wide variety of factors in considering Director
candidates, including (but not limited to): (i) the
candidates knowledge in matters relating to the investment
company industry; (ii) any experience possessed by the
candidate as a director or senior officer of other public or
private companies; (iii) the candidates educational
background; (iv) the candidates reputation for high
ethical standards and personal and professional integrity;
(v) any specific financial, technical or other expertise
possessed by the candidate, and the extent to which such
expertise would complement the Boards existing mix of
skills and qualifications; (vi) the candidates
perceived ability to contribute to the ongoing functions of the
Board, including the candidates ability and commitment to
attend meetings regularly, work collaboratively with other
members of the Board and carry out his or her duties in the best
interests of the Fund; (vii) the candidates ability
to qualify as an Independent Director; and (viii) such
other criteria as the Nominating Committee determines to be
relevant in light of the existing composition of the Board and
any anticipated vacancies or other factors.
Identification
of Nominees
In identifying potential nominees for the Board, the Committee
may consider candidates recommended by one or more of the
following sources: (i) the Funds Directors,
(ii) the Funds officers, (ii) the Funds
investment manager, investment adviser or their affiliates,
(iv) the Funds stockholders (see below) and
(v) any other source the Committee deems to be appropriate.
The Committee will not consider self-nominated candidates or
candidates nominated by members of a candidates family,
including such candidates spouse, children, parents,
siblings, uncles, aunts, grandparents, nieces and nephews. The
Committee may, but is not required to, retain a third-party
search firm at the Funds expense to identify potential
candidates.
Consideration
of Candidates Recommended by Stockholders
The Committee will consider nominee candidates properly
submitted by stockholders in accordance with applicable law, the
Funds Articles of Incorporation or By-laws, resolutions of
the Board and the qualifications and procedures set forth in
this Charter and the Funds annual proxy statement,
including the requirements that a stockholder or group of
stockholders seeking to submit a nominee candidate (i) must
have beneficially owned at least 5% of the Funds common
stock for at least two years, (ii) may submit only one
nominee candidate for any particular meeting of stockholders,
and (iii) may submit a nominee candidate for only an annual
meeting or other meeting of stockholders at which directors will
be elected. The Committee will evaluate nominee candidates
properly submitted by stockholders on the same basis as it
considers and evaluates candidates recommended by other sources.
Delegation
to Subcommittee
The Committee may, in its discretion, delegate all or a portion
of its duties and responsibilities to a subcommittee of the
Committee.
Resources
and Authority of the Committee
The Committee shall have the resources and authority appropriate
to discharge its duties and responsibilities, including the
authority to select, retain, terminate and approve the fees and
other retention terms of special counsel or other experts or
consultants, as it deems appropriate, without seeking approval
of the Board or management. With respect to consultants or
search firms used to identify director candidates, this
authority shall be vested solely in the Committee.
B-2
ANNEX C
THE
CENTRAL EUROPE AND RUSSIA FUND, INC.
EXCERPTS OF BY-LAWS
Article II
Section 13. Advance
Notice of Stockholder Nominees for Director and Other
Stockholder Proposals. (a) Annual Meetings of
Stockholders. (1) Nominations of persons
for election to the Board of Directors and the proposal of
business to be considered by the stockholders may be made at an
annual meeting of stockholders (i) pursuant to the
Corporations notice of meeting, (ii) by or at the
direction of the Board of Directors or (iii) by any
stockholder of the Corporation who was a stockholder of record
both at the time of giving of notice provided for in this
Section 13(a) and at the time of the annual meeting, who is
entitled to vote at the meeting and who complied with the notice
procedures set forth in this Section 13(a).
(2) For nominations or other business to be properly
brought before an annual meeting by a stockholder pursuant to
clause (iii) of paragraph (a)(1) of this Section 13,
the stockholder must have given timely notice thereof in writing
to the Secretary of the Corporation and such other business must
otherwise be a proper matter for action by the stockholders. To
be timely, a stockholders notice shall be delivered to the
Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Corporation
not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to
the first anniversary of the date of mailing of the notice for
the preceding years annual meeting; provided, however,
that in the event that the date of mailing of the notice for the
annual meeting is advanced or delayed by more than 30 days
from the first anniversary of the date of mailing of the notice
for the preceding years annual meeting, notice by the
stockholder to be timely must be so delivered not earlier than
the 120th day prior to the date of mailing of the notice
for such annual meeting and not later than the close of business
on the later of the 90th day prior to the date of mailing
of the notice for such annual meeting or the tenth day following
the day on which disclosure of the date of mailing of the notice
for such meeting is first made. In no event shall the public
announcement of a postponement or adjournment of an annual
meeting commence a new time period for the giving of a
stockholders notice as described above. Such
stockholders notice shall set forth (i) as to each
person whom the stockholder proposes to nominate for election or
reelection as a director, (A) the name, age, business
address and residence address of such person, (B) the class
and number of shares of stock of the Corporation that are
beneficially owned by such person, (C) all other
information relating to such person that is required to be
disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors
in an election contest (even if an election contest is not
involved), or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to
Regulation 14A (or any successor provision) under the
Exchange Act or pursuant to the Investment Company Act and the
rules thereunder (including such persons written consent
to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to
serving as a director if elected), and (D) a statement
specifying which of clauses (1)-(7) of the definition of
Relevant Experience and Country Knowledge in
Article III, Section 3 of the Bylaws the person being
nominated satisfies, information relating to such person
sufficient to support a determination that the person satisfies
the specified clause or clauses of the definition and a
representation that the person does not have a Conflict of
Interest as defined in Article III, Section 3 of
the Bylaws; (ii) as to any other business that the
stockholder proposes to bring before the meeting, a description
of the business desired to be brought before the meeting, the
reasons for conducting such business at the meeting and any
material interest in such business of such stockholder
(including any anticipated benefit to the stockholder therefrom)
and of each beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the
proposal is made; and (iii) as to the stockholder giving
the notice and each beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf
the nomination or proposal is made, (x) the name and
address of such stockholder, as they appear on the
Corporations stock ledgers and a current name and address,
if different, and of such beneficial owner, and (y) the
class and number of shares of each class of stock of the
Corporation which are owned beneficially and of record by such
stockholder and owned beneficially by such beneficial owner.
(3) Notwithstanding anything in this subsection (a) of
this Section 13 to the contrary, in the event the Board of
Directors increases or decreases the maximum or minimum number
of directors in accordance with Article III, Section 2
of these Bylaws, and there is no public announcement of such
action at least 100 days prior to the first anniversary of
the date of mailing of the preceding years annual meeting,
a stockholders notice required by this Section 13(a)
shall also be considered timely, but only with respect to
nominees for any new positions created by such increase, if it
shall be delivered to the Secretary at the principal executive
offices of the Corporation not later than the close of business
on the tenth day following the day on which such public
announcement is first made by the Corporation.
C-1
(b) Special Meetings of
Stockholders. Only such business shall be
conducted at a special meeting of stockholders as shall have
been brought before the meeting pursuant to the
Corporations notice of meeting. Nominations of persons for
election to the Board of Directors may be made at a special
meeting of stockholders at which directors are to be elected
(i) pursuant to the Corporations notice of meeting,
(ii) by or at the direction of the Board of Directors or
(iii) provided that the Board of Directors has determined
that directors shall be elected at such special meeting, by any
stockholder of the Corporation who is a stockholder of record
both at the time of giving of notice provided for in this
Section 13 and at the time of the special meeting, who is
entitled to vote at the meeting and who complied with the notice
procedures set forth in this Section 13. In the event the
Corporation calls a special meeting of stockholders for the
purpose of electing one or more directors to the Board of
Directors, any such stockholder may nominate a person or persons
(as the case may be) for election as a director as specified in
the Corporations notice of meeting, if the
stockholders notice required by paragraph (a)(2) of this
Section 13 shall be delivered to the Secretary at the
principal executive offices of the Corporation not earlier than
the 120th day prior to such special meeting and not later
than the close of business on the later of the 90th day
prior to such special meeting or the tenth day following the day
on which public announcement is first made of the date of the
special meeting and of the nominees proposed by the Board of
Directors to be elected at such meeting. In no event shall the
public announcement of a postponement or adjournment of a
special meeting commence a new time period for the giving of a
stockholders notice as described above.
(c) General. (1) Only such
persons who are nominated in accordance with the procedures set
forth in this Section 13 and Article III,
Section 3 of these Bylaws shall be eligible to serve as
directors and only such business shall be conducted at a meeting
of stockholders as shall have been brought before the meeting in
accordance with the procedures set forth in this
Section 13. The chairman of the meeting shall have the
power and duty to determine whether a nomination or any business
proposed to be brought before the meeting was made or proposed,
as the case may be, in accordance with the procedures set forth
in this Section 13 and, if any proposed nomination or
business is not in compliance with this Section 13, to
declare that such defective nomination or proposal be
disregarded.
(2) For purposes of this Section 13, (a) the
date of mailing of the notice shall mean the date of
the proxy statement for the solicitation of proxies for election
of directors and (b) public announcement shall
mean disclosure (i) in a press release reported by the Dow
Jones News Service, Associated Press or comparable news service
or (ii) in a document publicly filed by the Corporation
with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the
Exchange Act or the Investment Company Act.
(3) Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this
Section 13, a stockholder shall also comply with all
applicable requirements of state law and of the Exchange Act and
the Investment Company Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder with respect to the matters set forth in this
Section 13. Nothing in this Section 13 shall be deemed
to affect any right of stockholders to request inclusion of
proposals in, nor the right of the Corporation to omit a
proposal from, the Corporations proxy statement pursuant
to
Rule 14a-8
(or any successor provision) under the Exchange Act.
Article III
Section 3. Qualifications.
Directors need not be stockholders. Each Director shall hold
office until the earlier of: (a) the expiration of his term
and his or her successor shall have been elected and qualifies,
(b) his or her death, (c) his or her resignation, or
(d) his or her removal. To be eligible for nomination as a
director a person must, at the time of such persons
nomination, (a) have Relevant Experience and Country
Knowledge (as defined below), (b) not have any Conflict of
Interest (as defined below) and (c) not be over
72 years of age; provided that clause (c) shall not
apply to any person who was a Director on October 15, 1999
or to any person whom the Nominating Committee (or in the
absence of such a Committee, the Board of Directors) determines
to except from that clause on the basis that the persons
prior public or government service or other broad-based
activities in the business community make it essential that the
Corporation continue to receive the benefit of the persons
services as a Director. The determination described in the
previous sentence shall be made on or before the time of
nomination. Whether a proposed nominee satisfies the foregoing
qualifications shall be determined by the Nominating Committee
or, in the absence of such a Committee, by the Board of
Directors, each in its sole discretion.
For purpose of the following definitions of Relevant Experience
and Country Knowledge and Conflict of Interest, the term
Specified Country means any one or more of the
following countries: Czech Republic, Hungary, Germany, Poland or
Russia.
C-2
Relevant Experience and Country Knowledge means
experience in business, investment, economic or political
matters of a Specified Country or the United States, through
service for 10 of the past 20 years (except where a shorter
period is noted) in one or more of the following principal
occupations:
(1) senior executive officer or partner of a financial or
industrial business headquartered in a Specified Country and
that has annual revenues of at least the equivalent of US
$500 million,
(2) senior executive officer or partner of a financial or
industrial business headquartered in the United States that
has annual revenues of at least the equivalent of US
$500 million and whose management responsibilities include
supervision of business operations in a Specified Country or
other European country,
(3) director (or the equivalent) for 5 of the past
10 years of one or more investment businesses or vehicles
(including this Corporation) a principal focus of which is
investment in one or more Specified Countries and that have at
least the equivalent of US $250 million in combined total
assets of their own,
(4) senior executive officer or partner of an investment
management business having at least the equivalent of US
$500 million in securities of companies in one or more
Specified Countries or securities principally traded in one or
more Specified Countries under discretionary management for
others,
(5) senior executive officer or partner of a business
consulting, accounting or law firm having at least 100
professionals and whose principal responsibility involves or
involved providing services involving matters relating to a
Specified Country or other European country for financial or
industrial businesses, investment businesses or vehicles or
investment management businesses as described in (1) -
(4) above,
(6) senior official (including ambassador or minister)
(i) in the national government, a government agency or the
central bank of a Specified Country or the United States,
(ii) in a major supranational agency or organization of
which a Specified Country or the United States is a member, or
(iii) in a leading international trade organization
relating to a Specified Country or the United States, in each
case in the area of finance, economics, trade or foreign
relations, or
(7) current director or senior officer (without regard to
years of service) of an investment manager or adviser of the
Corporation, or of any entity controlling or under common
control with an investment manager or adviser of the Corporation.
For purposes of clauses (1) - (5) of the preceding sentence
and clauses (1) - (2) of the next paragraph, the term
financial or industrial business includes a
financial or industrial business unit within a larger
enterprise; the term investment businesses or
vehicles includes an investment business unit or
investment vehicle within a larger enterprise; the term
investment management business includes an
investment management business unit within a larger enterprise;
and the term investment vehicle includes an
investment vehicle within a larger enterprise; but in each case
only to the extent the unit satisfies the revenue, asset and
other requirements specified for the business or vehicle in
clauses (1) - (5) of the preceding sentence or clauses
(1) - (2) of the next paragraph.
Conflict of Interest means the presence of a
conflict with the interests of the Corporation or its operations
through any of the following:
(1) current position (a) as a director, officer,
partner or employee of another investment vehicle a significant
(i.e., 25% or more of total assets) focus of which is
securities of companies in one or more Specified Countries or
securities principally traded in markets of one or more
Specified Countries and that does not have the same investment
adviser as the Corporation or an investment adviser affiliated
with an investment adviser of the Corporation, and
(b) having direct and regular responsibilities relating to
that investment vehicle,
(2) current position as (a) a director, officer,
partner or employee of the sponsor (or equivalent) of an
investment vehicle described in the previous point and
(b) having direct and regular responsibilities relating to
that investment vehicle, or
(3) current position as an official of a governmental
agency or self-regulatory body having responsibility for
regulating the Corporation or the markets in which it proposes
to invest.
C-3
PROXY
THE CENTRAL EUROPE AND RUSSIA FUND, INC.
This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of
Directors.
The undersigned stockholder of The Central Europe and Russia
Fund, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the Fund),
hereby appoints John Millette, David Goldman and Rita Rubin, or
any of them, as proxies for the undersigned, with full power of
substitution in each of them, to attend the Annual Meeting of
the Stockholders of the Fund to be held at 10:00 a.m., New
York time, on June 30, 2009 at the New York Marriott East
Side Hotel, 525 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York 10017,
and any adjournment or postponement thereof, to cast on behalf
of the undersigned all votes that the undersigned is entitled to
cast at such meeting, and otherwise to represent the undersigned
at the meeting with all powers possessed by the undersigned if
personally present at the meeting. The undersigned hereby
acknowledges receipt of the Notice of the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders and of the accompanying Proxy Statement, the terms
of each of which are incorporated by reference herein, and
revokes any proxy heretofore given with respect to such meeting.
The votes entitled to be cast by the undersigned will be cast
as instructed below. If this Proxy is executed but no
instruction is given, the votes entitled to be cast by the
undersigned will be cast For each of the nominees
for director and For Proposal 2, as described
in the Proxy Statement and in the discretion of the Proxy holder
on any other matter that may properly come before the meeting or
any adjournment or postponement thereof.
Election of Directors. The Board of Directors unanimously
recommends a vote For the nominees
|
|
|
|
|
1. FOR each of the nominees
for director listed
below. o
|
|
WITHHOLD AUTHORITY
as to all listed
nominees. o
|
|
FOR all nominees except as marked to the contrary
below. o
|
(Instructions: To withhold
authority for any individual nominee, strike a line through the
nominees name in the list below.)
Dr. Franz
Wilhelm Hopp
Mr. Robert H. Wadsworth
Mr. Werner Walbröl
Mr. Christian H. Strenger
The Board
of Directors unanimously recommends a vote For
Proposal 2
|
|
|
|
2.
|
To ratify the appointment by the Audit Committee and the Board
of Directors of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent
public accounting firm, as independent auditors for the fiscal
year ending October 31, 2009.
|
FOR o AGAINST o ABSTAIN o
|
|
|
|
3.
|
To vote and otherwise represent the undersigned on any other
matter that may properly come before the meeting or any
adjournment or postponement thereof in the discretion of the
Proxy holder.
|
Signature
Signature, if held jointly
Please sign exactly as name appears on the records of the Fund
and date. If the shares are held jointly, each holder should
sign. When signing as an attorney, executor, administrator,
trustee, guardian, officer of a corporation or other entity or
in another representative capacity, please give the full title
under signature(s).
Dated: ,
2009