e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 001-34005
Lender Processing Services, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
26-1547801 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
601 Riverside Avenue Jacksonville, Florida
|
|
32204 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(904) 854-5100
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As
of April 30, 2010, 94,817,544 shares of the registrants common stock were outstanding.
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT
Quarter Ended March 31, 2010
INDEX
2
Part I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March |
|
|
December |
|
|
|
31, 2010 |
|
|
31, 2009 (1) |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
122,960 |
|
|
$ |
70,528 |
|
Trade receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $25.7 million and $26.0 million, respectively |
|
|
395,581 |
|
|
|
401,333 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
3,367 |
|
|
|
3,770 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
29,413 |
|
|
|
26,985 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net |
|
|
46,123 |
|
|
|
47,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
597,444 |
|
|
|
550,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $151.4 million and $146.2 million, respectively |
|
|
118,310 |
|
|
|
113,108 |
|
Computer software, net of accumulated amortization of $128.1 million and $120.3 million, respectively |
|
|
193,225 |
|
|
|
185,376 |
|
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $311.2 million and $304.4 million, respectively |
|
|
66,426 |
|
|
|
72,796 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,166,142 |
|
|
|
1,166,142 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
107,338 |
|
|
|
109,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,248,885 |
|
|
$ |
2,197,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
75,100 |
|
|
$ |
40,100 |
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
|
43,883 |
|
|
|
38,166 |
|
Accrued salaries and benefits |
|
|
28,786 |
|
|
|
54,376 |
|
Recording and transfer tax liabilities |
|
|
12,329 |
|
|
|
15,208 |
|
Due to affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,321 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
28,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
158,393 |
|
|
|
151,601 |
|
Deferred revenues |
|
|
63,593 |
|
|
|
66,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
410,974 |
|
|
|
369,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenues |
|
|
35,749 |
|
|
|
37,681 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net |
|
|
70,887 |
|
|
|
65,215 |
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion |
|
|
1,212,975 |
|
|
|
1,249,250 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
19,691 |
|
|
|
19,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,750,276 |
|
|
|
1,741,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock $0.0001 par value; 50 million shares authorized, none issued at March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $0.0001 par value; 500 million shares authorized, 97.4 million and 97.0 million shares issued
at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
191,993 |
|
|
|
173,424 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
393,913 |
|
|
|
330,963 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(5,751 |
) |
|
|
(7,630 |
) |
Treasury stock $0.0001 par value; 2.2 million and 1.2 million shares at March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009, respectively, at cost |
|
|
(81,556 |
) |
|
|
(40,909 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
498,609 |
|
|
|
455,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,248,885 |
|
|
$ |
2,197,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Derived from audited consolidated financial statements. |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Earnings
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Processing and services revenues (note 3) |
|
$ |
592,394 |
|
|
$ |
529,817 |
|
Cost of revenues (note 3) |
|
|
396,022 |
|
|
|
354,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
196,372 |
|
|
|
175,115 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses (note 3) |
|
|
60,720 |
|
|
|
71,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
135,652 |
|
|
|
103,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(18,845 |
) |
|
|
(21,914 |
) |
Other expense, net |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
(18,218 |
) |
|
|
(21,391 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes and
equity in losses of unconsolidated entity |
|
|
117,434 |
|
|
|
82,546 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
44,918 |
|
|
|
31,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations before equity in losses
of unconsolidated entity |
|
|
72,516 |
|
|
|
50,971 |
|
Equity in losses of unconsolidated entity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
72,516 |
|
|
|
50,934 |
|
Discontinued operation, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
72,516 |
|
|
|
50,430 |
|
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(384 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to Lender Processing Services, Inc. |
|
$ |
72,516 |
|
|
$ |
50,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts attributable to Lender Processing Services, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
72,516 |
|
|
$ |
50,550 |
|
Discontinued operation, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
72,516 |
|
|
$ |
50,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share basic from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
Net earnings per share basic from discontinued operation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share basic |
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic |
|
|
95,532 |
|
|
|
94,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share diluted from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
Net earnings per share diluted from discontinued operation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
96,416 |
|
|
|
95,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Earnings
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net earnings attributable to Lender Processing Services, Inc. |
|
$ |
72,516 |
|
|
$ |
50,046 |
|
Other comprehensive earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on other investments, net of tax |
|
|
(397 |
) |
|
|
47 |
|
Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps, net of tax (1) |
|
|
2,276 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive earnings |
|
|
1,879 |
|
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive earnings attributable to Lender Processing Services, Inc. |
|
$ |
74,395 |
|
|
$ |
50,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net of income tax expense of $1.4 million and $0.4 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009. |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statement of Equity
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
97,049 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
173,424 |
|
|
$ |
330,963 |
|
|
$ |
(7,630 |
) |
|
|
(1,210 |
) |
|
$ |
(40,909 |
) |
|
$ |
455,858 |
|
Net earnings attributable to Lender
Processing Services, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,516 |
|
Cash dividends paid (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,566 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,566 |
) |
Issuance of restricted stock |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options and restricted
stock vesting |
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(330 |
) |
|
|
12,448 |
|
Income tax expense from exercise of stock
options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(766 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(766 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,557 |
|
Treasury stock repurchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,021 |
) |
|
|
(40,317 |
) |
|
|
(40,317 |
) |
Unrealized loss on investments, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(397 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(397 |
) |
Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, March 31, 2010 |
|
|
97,426 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
191,993 |
|
|
$ |
393,913 |
|
|
$ |
(5,751 |
) |
|
|
(2,239 |
) |
|
$ |
(81,556 |
) |
|
$ |
498,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Dividends of $0.10 per common share were paid on March 30, 2010. |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to Lender Processing Services, Inc. |
|
$ |
72,516 |
|
|
$ |
50,046 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
23,654 |
|
|
|
23,991 |
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
1,282 |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,574 |
) |
Deferred income taxes, net |
|
|
5,917 |
|
|
|
(651 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
6,557 |
|
|
|
6,843 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) from exercise of stock options |
|
|
766 |
|
|
|
(1,222 |
) |
Equity in losses of unconsolidated entity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
Noncontrolling minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
384 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables |
|
|
5,752 |
|
|
|
(25,871 |
) |
Other receivables |
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
4,622 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(4,109 |
) |
|
|
(6,347 |
) |
Deferred revenues |
|
|
(4,941 |
) |
|
|
(479 |
) |
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other liabilities |
|
|
1,377 |
|
|
|
25,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
109,040 |
|
|
|
75,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property and equipment |
|
|
(12,265 |
) |
|
|
(11,659 |
) |
Additions to capitalized software |
|
|
(15,779 |
) |
|
|
(10,912 |
) |
Acquisition of title plants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,764 |
) |
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
490 |
|
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operation, net of cash distributed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,638 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(28,044 |
) |
|
|
(60,483 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt service payments |
|
|
(1,275 |
) |
|
|
(76,276 |
) |
Exercise of stock options and restricted stock vesting |
|
|
12,448 |
|
|
|
714 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit from exercise of stock options |
|
|
(766 |
) |
|
|
1,222 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(9,566 |
) |
|
|
(9,481 |
) |
Treasury stock repurchases |
|
|
(26,427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payments of contingent consideration related to acquisitions |
|
|
(2,978 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(28,564 |
) |
|
|
(83,821 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
52,432 |
|
|
|
(68,931 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
70,528 |
|
|
|
125,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
122,960 |
|
|
$ |
57,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
25,839 |
|
|
$ |
28,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for taxes |
|
$ |
7,641 |
|
|
$ |
7,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash redistribution of assets to FIS |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash consideration received from sale of discontinued operation |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
40,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash consideration issued in acquisition of business |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5,162 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
7
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Except as otherwise indicated or unless the context otherwise requires, all references to
LPS, we, the Company, or the registrant are to Lender Processing Services, Inc., a Delaware
corporation that was incorporated in December 2007 as a wholly-owned subsidiary of FIS, and its
subsidiaries; all references to FIS, the former parent, or the holding company are to
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc., a Georgia corporation formerly known as Certegy Inc.,
and its subsidiaries, that owned all of LPSs shares until July 2, 2008; all references to former
FIS are to Fidelity National Information Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its
subsidiaries, prior to the Certegy merger described below; all references to old FNF are to
Fidelity National Financial, Inc., a Delaware corporation that owned a majority of former FISs
shares through November 9, 2006; and all references to FNF are to Fidelity National Financial,
Inc. (formerly known as Fidelity National Title Group, Inc.), formerly a subsidiary of old FNF but
now a stand-alone company.
(1) Basis of Presentation
The unaudited financial information included in this report includes the accounts of Lender
Processing Services, Inc. and its subsidiaries prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.
All adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The preparation of these consolidated
financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from
those estimates. This report should be read in conjunction with the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K that was filed on February 23, 2010 and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Lender Processing Services, Inc. Spin-off Transaction
On July 2, 2008, FIS distributed to its shareholders a dividend of one-half share of our
common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, for each issued and outstanding share of FIS common
stock held on June 24, 2008, which we refer to as the spin-off. Also on July 2, 2008, FIS
exchanged 100% of our debt obligations for a like amount of FISs existing Tranche B Term Loans
issued under its Credit Agreement dated as of January 18, 2007. The spin-off was tax-free to FIS
and its shareholders, and the debt-for-debt exchange undertaken in connection with the spin-off was
tax-free to FIS. On July 3, 2008, we commenced regular way trading on the New York Stock Exchange
under the trading symbol LPS. Prior to the spin-off, we were a wholly-owned subsidiary of FIS.
Principles of Consolidation
The historical financial statements of the Company have been presented on a consolidated basis
for financial reporting purposes.
Reporting Segments
We are a provider of integrated technology and outsourced services to the mortgage lending
industry, with mortgage processing and default management services in the U.S. We conduct our
operations through two reporting segments, Technology, Data and Analytics and Loan Transaction
Services.
8
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(2) Fair Value
Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities
The fair value of financial assets and liabilities are determined using the following fair
value hierarchy:
|
|
|
Level 1 Inputs to the valuation methodology are unadjusted quoted prices for identical
assets or liabilities in active markets that the Company has the ability to access. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs to the valuation methodology include: |
|
|
|
quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; |
|
|
|
|
quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets; |
|
|
|
|
inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; and |
|
|
|
|
inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by
correlation or other means. |
|
|
|
Level 3 Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair
value measurement. |
Assets are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant
to the fair value measurement. Our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other
market participants. The use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value
of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the
reporting date.
The following tables set forth by level within the fair value hierarchy our assets and
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
As of March 31, 2010 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Classification |
|
Carrying Value |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
Asset |
|
$ |
123.0 |
|
|
$ |
123.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
123.0 |
|
Long-term debt (note 6) |
|
Liability |
|
|
1,288.1 |
|
|
|
393.3 |
|
|
|
918.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,312.1 |
|
Interest rate swaps (note 6) |
|
Liability |
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
As of December 31, 2009 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Classification |
|
Carrying Value |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
Asset |
|
$ |
70.5 |
|
|
$ |
70.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
70.5 |
|
Long-term debt (note 6) |
|
Liability |
|
|
1,289.4 |
|
|
|
390.7 |
|
|
|
912.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,303.0 |
|
Interest rate swaps (note 6) |
|
Liability |
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
The fair values of other financial instruments, which primarily include trade receivables and
payables and other receivables, are estimated as of period-end. The carrying amounts of these
assets and liabilities approximate their fair values. These estimates are subjective in nature and
involve uncertainties and significant judgment in the interpretation of current market data.
Therefore, the values presented are not necessarily indicative of amounts we could realize or
settle currently.
9
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Fair Value of Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed
The values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations are estimated
using various assumptions. The most significant assumptions, and those requiring the most judgment,
involve the estimated fair values of intangible assets and software, with the remaining value, if
any, attributable to goodwill. The Company utilizes third-party experts to determine the fair values of intangible assets and software
purchased in business combinations.
(3) Related Party Transactions
We have historically conducted business with FNF and FIS. Because William P. Foley, II serves
as Executive Chairman of the board of directors of FNF and served as Executive Chairman of the
Board of LPS prior to March 15, 2009, FNF was considered a related party of the Company. Mr. Foley
retired from our Board of Directors on March 15, 2009. Accordingly, for periods subsequent to March
15, 2009, FNF is not a related party. Because Lee A. Kennedy serves as Executive Chairman of our
Board, and served on our Board of Directors in other capacities since May 2008, and served as an
executive and a director of FIS until February 28, 2010, FIS was considered a related party of the
Company. Mr. Kennedy retired as an executive and a director of FIS on February 28, 2010.
Accordingly, for periods subsequent to February 28, 2010, FIS is not a related party. Additionally,
Mr. Kennedy was appointed interim Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Ceridian Corporation
(Ceridian) on January 25, 2010, and therefore, Ceridian will be a related party for periods
during the term of his interim service.
We have various agreements with FNF under which we provide title agency services, software
development and other data services. Additionally, we have been allocated corporate costs from FIS
and will continue to receive certain corporate services from FIS for a period of time, and have
other agreements under which we incur other expenses to, or receive revenues from, FIS and FNF. A
summary of these agreements in effect as of March 31, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
Agreements to provide title agency services. These agreements allow us to provide services
to existing customers through loan facilitation transactions, primarily with large national
lenders. The arrangement involves providing title agency services which result in the
issuance of title policies on behalf of title insurance underwriters owned by FNF. Subject to
certain early termination provisions for cause, each of these agreements may be terminated
upon five years prior written notice, which notice may not be given until after the fifth
anniversary of the effective date of each agreement, which ranges from July 2004 through
September 2006 (thus effectively resulting in a minimum ten year term and a rolling one-year
term thereafter). Under these agreements, we earn commissions which, in the aggregate, are
equal to at least 87% of the total title premium from title policies that we place with
subsidiaries of FNF. The commissions we earn are subject to adjustment based on changes in
FNFs provision for claim losses, but under no circumstances are the commissions less than
87%. We also perform similar functions in connection with trustee sale guarantees, a form of
title insurance that subsidiaries of FNF issue as part of the foreclosure process on a
defaulted loan. |
|
|
|
|
Agreements to provide software development and services. Under these agreements, we are
paid for providing software development and services to FNF which consist of developing
software for use in the title operations of FNF. |
|
|
|
|
Arrangements to provide other data services. Under these arrangements, we are paid for
providing other data services to FNF, primarily consisting of data services required by the
FNF title insurance operations. |
10
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
A detail of related party items included in revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2010
and 2009 is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (1) |
|
|
2009 (2) |
|
Title agency commissions |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
74.8 |
|
Software development revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
Other data related services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
91.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes revenues generated from FIS under these agreements through February 28, 2010. The
revenues generated from FIS were less than $10,000 during the period from January 1, 2010 to
February 28, 2010. FIS ceased to be a related party of the Company on February 28, 2010. We
continue to generate revenues from contracts that were entered into while FIS was a related
party. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes revenues generated from FNF under these agreements through March 31, 2009. FNF
ceased to be a related party of the Company on March 15, 2009; however, it was impracticable
to estimate revenues received from FNF as of that date. We continue to generate revenues from
contracts that were entered into while FNF was a related party. |
|
|
|
Title plant access and title production services. Under these agreements, we obtain access
to FNFs title plants for real property located in various states, including access to their
online databases, physical access to title records, use of space, image system use, and use
of special software, as well as other title production services. For the title plant access,
we pay monthly fees (subject to certain minimum charges) based on the number of title reports
or products ordered and other services received. For the title production services, we pay
for services based on the number of properties searched, subject to certain minimum use. The
title plant access agreement had an initial term of 3 years beginning in November 2006 and is
automatically renewable for successive 3 year terms unless either party gives 30 days prior
written notice. The title production services agreement can be terminated by either party
upon 30 days prior written notice. |
|
|
|
|
Agreements to provide administrative corporate support services to and from FIS and from
FNF. Historically, FNF provided to FIS certain administrative corporate support services
relating to general management, statutory accounting, claims administration, and other
administrative support services. Prior to the spin-off, as a part of FIS, we also received
these administrative corporate support services from FNF. In connection with the spin-off, we
entered into a separate agreement with FNF for the provision of certain of these
administrative corporate support services by FNF. In addition, prior to the spin-off, FIS
provided general management, accounting, treasury, payroll, human resources, internal audit,
and other corporate administrative support services to us. In connection with the spin-off,
we entered into corporate services agreements with FIS under which we receive from FIS, and
we provide to FIS, certain transitional corporate support services. The pricing for all of
these services, both from FNF and FIS, and to FIS, is on an at-cost basis. The term of the
corporate services agreements is two years, subject to early termination because the services
are no longer required by the party receiving the services or upon mutual agreement of the
parties and subject to extension in certain circumstances. Management believes the methods
used to allocate the amounts included in these financial statements for corporate services
are reasonable. |
|
|
|
|
Agreement to receive support services from Ceridian. Ceridian provides certain support
services to our human resources group, including Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
administrative services, military leave administrative services and Consolidated Omnibus
Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) health benefit services. The FMLA and military leave
agreement had an initial term of 1 year beginning in January 2010 and is automatically
renewable for successive 1 year terms unless either party gives 90 days prior written notice,
or 30 days after written notice in the event of a breach. The COBRA agreement had an initial
term of 1 year beginning in January 2009 and is automatically renewable for successive 1 year
terms unless either party gives 90 days prior written notice, or 30 days after written notice
in the event of a breach. |
11
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
|
|
|
Corporate aircraft use agreements. Historically the Company has had access to certain
corporate aircraft owned or leased by FNF and by FIS. Pursuant to an aircraft interchange
agreement, LPS is included as an additional permitted user of corporate aircraft leased by
FNF and FIS. FNF and FIS also continue to be permitted users of any aircraft leased by LPS.
LPS was also added as a party to the aircraft cost sharing
agreement that was previously signed between FNF and FIS. Under this agreement, the Company and
FIS share the costs of one of FNFs aircraft that is used by all of the entities. The cost for
use of each aircraft under the aircraft interchange agreement is calculated on the same basis
and reflects the costs attributable to the time the aircraft is in use by the user. The aircraft
interchange agreement is terminable by any party on 30 days prior notice. The costs under the
aircraft cost sharing agreement are shared equally among FNF, FIS and the Company, and the
agreement remains in effect so long as FNF has possession or use of the aircraft (or any
replacement) but may be terminated at any time with the consent of FNF, FIS and the Company. |
|
|
|
|
Real estate management, real estate lease and equipment lease agreements. In connection
with the spin-off and the transfer of the real property located at the Companys corporate
headquarters campus from FIS to LPS, the Company entered into new leases with FNF and FIS, as
tenants, as well as a new sublease with FNF, as sub landlord, for office space in the
building known as Building V, which is leased by FNF and is located on the Companys
corporate headquarters campus. The Company also entered into a new property management
agreement with FNF with respect to Building V. Included in the Companys expenses are amounts
paid to FNF for the lease of certain equipment and the sublease of office space in Building
V, together with furniture and furnishings. In addition, the Companys financials include
amounts paid by FNF and FIS for the lease of office space located at the Companys corporate
headquarters campus and property management services for FNF for Building V. |
|
|
|
|
Licensing, cost sharing, business processing and other agreements. These agreements
provide for the reimbursement of certain amounts from FNF and FIS related to various
licensing and cost sharing agreements, as well as the payment of certain amounts by the
Company to FNF or its subsidiaries in connection with our use of certain intellectual
property or other assets of or services by FNF. |
A detail of related party items included in expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2010
and 2009 is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (1) |
|
|
2009 (2) |
|
Title plant information expense (3) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
Corporate services (4) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
3.5 |
|
Licensing, leasing and cost sharing agreements (4) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes expense reimbursements paid to or received from FIS under these agreements through
February 28, 2010. FIS ceased to be a related party of the Company on February 28, 2010. We
continue to incur expenses and receive reimbursements under contracts that were entered into
while FIS was a related party. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes expense reimbursements paid to or received from FNF under these agreements through
March 31, 2009. FNF ceased to be a related party of the Company on March 15, 2009; however, it
was impracticable to estimate expense reimbursements paid to FNF as of that date. We continue
to incur expenses and receive reimbursements under contracts that were entered into while FNF
was a related party. |
|
(3) |
|
Included in cost of revenues. |
|
(4) |
|
Included in selling, general, and administrative expenses. |
12
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
We believe the amounts earned from or charged by FNF or FIS under each of the foregoing
service arrangements are fair and reasonable. We believe that the aggregate commission rate on
title insurance policies is consistent with the blended rate that would be available to a third
party title agent given the amount and the geographic distribution of the business produced and the
low risk of loss profile of the business placed. The software development services provided to FNF
are priced within the range of prices we offer to third parties. These transactions between us and
FIS and FNF are subject to periodic review for performance and pricing.
Other related party transactions:
FNRES Holdings, Inc. and Investment Property Exchange Services, Inc.
On December 31, 2006, FNF contributed $52.5 million to FNRES Holdings, Inc. (FNRES), a FIS
subsidiary, for approximately 61% of the outstanding shares of FNRES. In June 2008, FIS contributed
its remaining 39% equity investment in FNRES to the Company in the spin-off (note 1). On February
6, 2009, we acquired the remaining 61% of the equity interest of FNRES from FNF in exchange for all
of our interests in Investment Property Exchange Services, Inc. (IPEX) (note 5). The exchange
resulted in FNRES becoming our wholly-owned subsidiary.
(4) Net Earnings Per Share
The basic weighted average shares and common stock equivalents are computed using the treasury
stock method. The following table summarizes the earnings per share for the three months ending
March 31, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Amounts attributable to Lender Processing Services, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
$ |
72,516 |
|
|
$ |
50,550 |
|
Discontinued operation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
72,516 |
|
|
$ |
50,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic |
|
|
95,532 |
|
|
|
94,847 |
|
Plus: Common stock equivalent shares |
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
96,416 |
|
|
|
95,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share basic from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
Net earnings per share basic from discontinued operation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share basic |
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share diluted from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
Net earnings per share diluted from discontinued operation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase approximately 1.1 million shares and 5.5 million shares of our common
stock were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, because they were antidilutive.
We intend to limit dilution caused by option exercises, including anticipated exercises, by
repurchasing shares on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. On June 18, 2009,
our Board of Directors approved a plan authorizing repurchases of common stock and/or senior notes
of up to $75.0 million, of which $50.0 million was available to repurchase our senior notes. On
February 5, 2010, our Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase shares of our common stock
and/or our senior notes in an amount not to exceed $150.0 million. This new authorization replaces
the previous authorization and subsumes all amounts remaining available thereunder. The new plan is
effective through March 31, 2012. Our ability to repurchase shares of common stock or senior notes
is subject to restrictions contained in our senior secured credit agreement and in the indenture
governing our senior
13
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
unsecured notes. During the first quarter, we repurchased 1.0 million shares
of our stock for $40.3 million, at an average price of $39.50 per share. As of March 31, 2010, we
had $126.1 million remaining available for repurchases under our $150.0 million authorization
approved by our Board of Directors on February 5, 2010.
(5) Acquisitions and Dispositions
The results of operations and financial position of entities acquired during the year ended
December 31, 2009 are included in the consolidated financial statements from and after the date of
acquisition. We did not acquire any entities during the first three months of 2010. The purchase
price of each acquisition was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on
their fair value with any excess cost over fair value being allocated to goodwill. The impact of
the acquisitions made from January 1, 2009 through March 31, 2010 was not significant individually
or in the aggregate to our historical financial results.
NRC Rising Tide National Auction & REO Solutions, LLC
On October 30, 2009, our subsidiary, LPS Auction Solutions, LLC, acquired substantially all of
the assets of NRC
Rising Tide National Auction & REO Solutions, LLC (Rising Tide) for a $3.7 million cash
payment and a contingent earn-out payment not to exceed $30.0 million. As a result of the
transaction, we recognized a contingent earn-out liability totaling $28.2 million. We are in the
process of finalizing our review of contingent liabilities resulting from the purchase. The
acquisition has resulted in the recognition of $29.0 million of goodwill and $2.9 million of other
intangible assets and software. The allocation of the purchase price to goodwill and intangible
assets was based on the valuations performed to determine the values of such assets as of the
acquisition date. The valuation of Rising Tide was determined using a combination of the income and
cost approaches utilizing Level 3-type inputs. Rising Tide is now a part of the Loan Transaction
Services segment and it expands our default management services by providing entry into the
residential REO auction services market.
RealEC Technologies, Inc.
On July 21, 2009, our subsidiary, LPS Asset Management Solutions, Inc. (Asset Management),
acquired 22% of the noncontrolling minority interest of RealEC Technologies, Inc. (RealEC) for
$2.6 million. On November 12, 2009, Asset Management acquired the remaining 22% of the
noncontrolling minority interest of RealEC for $4.3 million. Prior to the acquisitions we owned 56%
of the interest of RealEC, which was consolidated as a part of the Technology, Data and Analytics
segment, and we reported noncontrolling minority interest related to RealEC in the equity section
of our consolidated balance sheets. RealEC contributed net earnings attributable to minority
interest of $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The transactions resulted in
RealEC becoming our wholly-owned subsidiary, and we no longer have any outstanding noncontrolling
minority interest.
Tax Verification Bureau, Inc.
On June 19, 2009, we acquired Tax Verification Bureau, Inc., which we have renamed LPS
Verification Bureau, Inc. (Verification Bureau), for $14.9 million (net of cash acquired). As a
result of the transaction, during 2010 we have paid contingent consideration totaling $3.0 million,
of which $2.8 million was recognized as goodwill and $0.2 was recognized as expense. We also
recognized a deferred tax liability totaling $3.1 million. The acquisition resulted in the
recognition of $12.8 million of goodwill and $7.7 million of other intangible assets and software.
The allocation of the purchase price to goodwill and intangible assets was based on the valuations
performed to determine the values of such assets as of the acquisition date. The valuation of
Verification Bureau was determined using a combination of the income and cost approaches utilizing
Level 3-type inputs. Verification Bureau is now a part of the Technology, Data and Analytics
segment and it expands our data and analytics offerings and fraud solutions capabilities.
14
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
FNRES Holdings, Inc.
On February 6, 2009, we acquired the remaining 61% of the equity interest of FNRES from FNF in
exchange for all of our interests in Investment Property Exchange Services, Inc. (IPEX). FNRES is
now a part of the Technology, Data and Analytics segment and it expands our data and analytics
offerings and IT development capabilities. The exchange resulted in FNRES, which we subsequently
renamed LPS Real Estate Group, Inc., becoming our wholly-owned subsidiary. Prior to the exchange we
did not consolidate FNRES, but recorded our 39% interest as an equity investment. We recorded
equity losses (net of tax) from our investment in FNRES of $2.0 million from January 1, 2009 to
February 6, 2009. The net earnings from IPEX, including related party revenues and expense
reimbursements, have been reclassified as a discontinued operation in our consolidated statements
of earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
FNRES and IPEX were valued at $66.6 million (including $0.5 million in cash) and $37.8 million
(including $32.6 million in cash), respectively, resulting in the recognition of a pre-tax gain of
$2.6 million ($0.5 million after-tax) which is included in discontinued operation in our
consolidated statements of earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The valuation of
FNRES was determined using a combination of the market and income approaches utilizing Level 2 and
Level 3-type inputs, while the valuation of IPEX was determined using the income approach utilizing
Level 3-type inputs. As a result of the transaction, we recognized $32.6 million of goodwill and
$14.2 million of other intangible assets and software. The allocation of the purchase price to
goodwill and intangible assets is based on the valuations performed to determine the values of such
assets as of the acquisition date. FNRES contributed revenues of $8.6 million and $6.8 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and pre-tax loss of $0.5 million and
$0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
(6) Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Term A Loan, secured, interest
payable at LIBOR plus 2.00% (2.25% at
March 31, 2010), quarterly principal
amortization, maturing July 2013 |
|
$ |
420,000 |
|
|
$ |
420,000 |
|
Term B Loan, secured, interest payable
at LIBOR plus 2.50% (2.75% at March 31,
2010), quarterly principal amortization,
maturing July 2014 |
|
|
501,075 |
|
|
|
502,350 |
|
Revolving Loan, secured, interest
payable at LIBOR plus 2.00%
(Eurocurrency Borrowings), Fed-funds
plus 2.00% (Swingline Borrowings) or
Prime plus 1.00% (Base Rate Borrowings)
(2.25%, 2.09% or 4.25%, respectively, at
March 31, 2010), maturing July 2013.
Total of $138.9 million unused (net of
outstanding letters of credit) as of
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior unsecured notes, issued at par,
interest payable semiannually at 8.125%,
due July 2016 |
|
|
367,000 |
|
|
|
367,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,288,075 |
|
|
|
1,289,350 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
(75,100 |
) |
|
|
(40,100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, excluding current portion |
|
$ |
1,212,975 |
|
|
$ |
1,249,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the Companys long-term debt at March 31, 2010 is estimated to be
approximately 102% of the carrying value. We have estimated the fair value of the term loans based
on values of recent quoted market prices and estimated the fair value of the notes based on values
of recent trades.
Principal Maturities of Debt
There have been no significant changes to our principal maturities since our Annual Report on
Form 10-K was filed on February 23, 2010.
15
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Interest Rate Swaps
We have entered into interest rate swap transactions in order to convert a portion of our
interest rate exposure on our floating rate debt from variable to fixed. We have designated these
interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges. The estimated fair value of these cash flow hedges resulted in liabilities of $9.5 million and
$13.2 million as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, and is included in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets in other accrued liabilities. A portion of the amount
included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings will be reclassified into interest expense as
a yield adjustment as interest payments are made on the Term Loans. The inputs used to determine
the estimated fair value of our interest rate swaps are Level 2-type measurements. We have
considered our own credit risk when determining the fair value of our interest rate swaps.
A summary of the effect of derivative instruments on amounts recognized in other comprehensive
earnings (OCE) and on the accompanying consolidated statement of earnings for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Loss Recognized in OCE on Derivatives |
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Interest rate swap contract |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Loss Reclassified from Accumulated OCE into Income |
Location of Loss Reclassified from Accumulated OCE into Income |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(4.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.9 |
) |
It is our policy to execute such instruments with credit-worthy banks and not to enter
into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. As of March 31, 2010, we believe
our interest rate swap counterparties will be able to fulfill their obligations under our
agreements, and we believe we will have debt outstanding through the various expiration dates of
the swaps such that the occurrence of future hedge cash flows remains probable.
(7) Income Taxes
Reserves for uncertain tax positions are computed by determining a minimum recognition
threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements.
It also provides guidance on measurement and classification of amounts relating to uncertain tax
positions, accounting for interest and penalties, and disclosures. The Company has performed an
evaluation of its tax positions and has concluded that as of March 31, 2010, there were no
significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in its financial statements. The
Companys policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a
component of income tax expense.
(8) Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
In the ordinary course of business, we are involved in various pending and threatened
litigation matters related to our operations, some of which include claims for punitive or
exemplary damages. Often, these matters do not include a specific statement as to the dollar amount
of damages demanded. Instead, they include a demand in an amount to be proved at trial. For these
reasons, it is often not possible to make a meaningful estimate of the amount or range of loss that
could result from these matters. Accordingly, we review matters on an ongoing basis when making
accrual and disclosure decisions. When assessing reasonably possible and probable outcomes, we base
our decision on our assessment of the ultimate outcome following all appeals. We intend to
vigorously defend all litigation matters that are brought against us, and we do not believe that
the ultimate disposition of any of these lawsuits will have a material adverse impact on our
financial position or results of operations. Finally, we believe that no actions, other than the
matter listed below, depart from customary litigation incidental to our business.
16
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Schneider, Kenneth, et al. vs. Lender Processing Services, Inc., et al.
On February 17, 2010 this putative class action complaint was filed in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Florida. In a single count complaint, the plaintiffs
sought to recover unspecified damages for alleged violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices
Act relating to the preparation and use of assignments of mortgage in foreclosure actions. The
defendants included two large banks, as well as LPS and our document solutions subsidiary. The
complaint essentially alleged that the industry practice of creating assignments of mortgages after
the actual date on which a loan was transferred from one beneficial owner to another is unlawful.
The complaint also challenged the authority of individuals employed by our document solutions
subsidiary to execute such assignments as officers of various banks and mortgage companies. On February 26,
2010, this case was voluntarily dismissed.
Regulatory Matters
Due to the heavily regulated nature of the mortgage industry, from time to time we receive
inquiries and requests for information from various state and federal regulatory agencies,
including state insurance departments, attorneys general and other agencies, about various matters
relating to our business. These inquiries take various forms, including informal or formal
requests, reviews, investigations and subpoenas. We attempt to cooperate with all such inquiries.
Recently, during an internal review of the business processes used by our document solutions
subsidiary, we identified a business process that caused an error in the notarization of certain
documents, some of which were used in foreclosure proceedings in various jurisdictions around the
country. The services performed by this subsidiary were offered to a limited number of customers,
were unrelated to our core default management services and were immaterial to our financial
results. We immediately corrected the business process and began to take remedial actions necessary
to cure the defect in an effort to minimize the impact of the error. We subsequently received an
inquiry relating to this matter from the Clerk of Court of Fulton County, Georgia, which is the
regulatory body responsible for licensing the notaries used by our document solutions subsidiary.
In response, we met with the Clerk of Court, along with members of her staff, and reported on our
identification of the error and the status of the corrective actions that were underway. We have
since completed our remediation efforts with respect to the affected documents, and we believe that
the matter with the Clerk of Court is closed. Most recently, we have learned that the U.S.
Attorneys office for the Middle District of Florida is reviewing the business processes of this
subsidiary. We have expressed our willingness to fully cooperate with the U.S. Attorney. We
continue to believe that we have taken necessary remedial action with respect to this matter.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements other than operating leases and the
escrow arrangements described below.
Escrow Arrangements
In conducting our title agency, closing and tax services, we routinely hold customers assets
in escrow accounts, pending completion of real estate related transactions. Certain of these
amounts are maintained in segregated accounts, and these amounts have not been included in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets. As an incentive for holding deposits at certain banks, we
periodically have programs for realizing economic benefits through favorable arrangements with
these banks. As of March 31, 2010, the aggregate value of all amounts held in escrow in our title
agency, closing and tax services operations totaled $255.3 million.
(9) Stock Option Plans
Awards issued to our employees prior to the spin-off were originally issued under plans
established by FIS and old FNF. On July 2, 2008, in connection with the spin-off, all options and
restricted stock awards held by our
17
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
employees prior to the spin-off were converted into options and
awards issuable in our common stock, authorized by our new stock option plan. The exercise price
and number of shares subject to each option and restricted stock award were adjusted to reflect the
differences in FISs and our common stock prices, which resulted in an equal fair value of the
options before and after the exchange. Therefore, no compensation charge was recorded in connection
with the conversion. Since July 2, 2008, all options and awards held by our employees are issuable
in LPS common stock.
Our employees participate in LPSs 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the Plan). Under the Plan,
the Company may grant up to 14 million share-based awards to officers, directors and key employees.
As of March 31, 2010, 4.7 million share-based awards were available for future grant under the
Plan. The shares may be issued from authorized and unissued shares of the Companys common stock,
or from the Companys treasury shares. Expired and forfeited awards are available for re-issuance.
Vesting and exercise of share-based awards are generally contingent on continued employment.
The Company recognizes equity compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting
period of share-based awards. We recorded stock compensation expense of $6.6 million and $6.8
million during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, which is included in
selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of
earnings. Additionally, we recorded an income tax expense (benefit) related to the exercise of
stock options of $0.8 million and $(1.2) million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009, respectively.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, $0.3 million and $1.1 million,
respectively, of cash was used for minimum statutory withholding requirements upon net settlement
of employee share-based awards.
As of March 31, 2010, the Company had $36.1 million of unrecognized compensation cost related
to share-based payments, which is expected to be recognized in pre-tax earnings over a weighted
average period of 1.29 years.
Options
The following table summarizes stock option activity under the Plan during the three months
ended March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Exercise |
|
Contractual |
|
Exercisable |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Price |
|
Life |
|
Shares |
Outstanding as of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
6,806,710 |
|
|
|
32.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Granted |
|
|
6,900 |
|
|
|
37.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised (1) |
|
|
(377,063 |
) |
|
|
33.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of March 31, 2010 (2) |
|
|
6,436,547 |
|
|
|
32.06 |
|
|
|
4.89 |
|
|
|
2,987,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the three months ended March 31,
2010 was $2.5 million. |
|
(2) |
|
The total intrinsic value of stock options outstanding as of March 31, 2010 was $36.7
million. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercisable as of March 31, 2010 was $15.3
million. |
The number of shares vested and expected to vest, which is calculated using our forfeiture
rate of 2%, total approximately 6.3 million, have a weighted average remaining contractual life of
4.89 years, a weighted average exercise price of $32.06 and an intrinsic value of $36.0 million.
18
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Restricted Stock
Approximately 0.7 million shares of LPS restricted stock awards were outstanding as of March
31, 2010.
(10) Segment Information
Summarized unaudited financial information concerning our segments is shown in the following
tables.
As of and for the three months ended March 31, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology, |
|
|
Loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data and |
|
|
Transaction |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analytics |
|
|
Services |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Results from continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Processing and services revenues |
|
$ |
179,462 |
|
|
$ |
415,285 |
|
|
$ |
(2,353 |
) |
|
$ |
592,394 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
105,795 |
|
|
|
292,609 |
|
|
|
(2,382 |
) |
|
|
396,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
73,667 |
|
|
|
122,676 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
196,372 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
19,811 |
|
|
|
23,857 |
|
|
|
17,052 |
|
|
|
60,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
53,856 |
|
|
$ |
98,819 |
|
|
$ |
(17,023 |
) |
|
$ |
135,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
16,538 |
|
|
$ |
5,186 |
|
|
$ |
1,930 |
|
|
$ |
23,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,166,162 |
|
|
$ |
831,307 |
|
|
$ |
251,416 |
|
|
$ |
2,248,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
760,081 |
|
|
$ |
406,061 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,166,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the three months ended March 31, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology, |
|
|
Loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data and |
|
|
Transaction |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analytics |
|
|
Services |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Results from continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Processing and services revenues |
|
$ |
159,879 |
|
|
$ |
374,523 |
|
|
$ |
(4,585 |
) |
|
$ |
529,817 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
90,463 |
|
|
|
268,936 |
|
|
|
(4,697 |
) |
|
|
354,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
69,416 |
|
|
|
105,587 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
175,115 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
16,066 |
|
|
|
27,359 |
|
|
|
27,753 |
|
|
|
71,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
53,350 |
|
|
$ |
78,228 |
|
|
$ |
(27,641 |
) |
|
$ |
103,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
17,375 |
|
|
$ |
4,608 |
|
|
$ |
2,003 |
|
|
$ |
23,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,115,028 |
|
|
$ |
788,151 |
|
|
$ |
180,112 |
|
|
$ |
2,083,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
734,054 |
|
|
$ |
377,072 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,111,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11) Condensed Consolidating Financial Information
On July 2, 2008, LPS (the Parent Company) entered into a credit agreement and issued senior
notes (note 6). The credit agreement and senior notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed,
jointly and severally, by the majority of the subsidiaries of the Parent Company (the Subsidiary
Guarantors). Certain other subsidiaries (the Other Subsidiaries) are not guarantors of the
Credit Agreement and the Notes. The guarantees by the Subsidiary Guarantors are senior to any of
their existing and future subordinated obligations, equal in right of payment with any of their
existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness and effectively subordinated to any of their
existing and future secured indebtedness.
The Parent Company conducts virtually all of its business operations through its Subsidiary
Guarantors and Other Subsidiaries. Accordingly, the Parent Companys main sources of internally
generated cash are dividends and distributions with respect to its ownership interests in the
subsidiaries, which are derived from the cash flows generated by the subsidiaries. Through March
31, 2010, no dividends have been paid by the subsidiaries to the Parent Company.
19
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
The following tables set forth, on a condensed consolidating basis, the balance sheet, the
statement of earnings and the statement of cash flows for the Parent Company, the Subsidiary
Guarantors and Other Subsidiaries as of and
for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
The following table represents our condensed consolidating balance sheet as of March 31, 2010
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Amounts |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
20,669 |
|
|
$ |
556,332 |
|
|
$ |
20,443 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
597,444 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
1,757,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,757,539 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
16,313 |
|
|
|
1,618,990 |
|
|
|
16,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,651,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,794,521 |
|
|
$ |
2,175,322 |
|
|
$ |
36,581 |
|
|
$ |
(1,757,539 |
) |
|
$ |
2,248,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
82,937 |
|
|
$ |
312,951 |
|
|
$ |
15,086 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
410,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,295,912 |
|
|
|
437,836 |
|
|
|
16,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,750,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
498,609 |
|
|
|
1,737,486 |
|
|
|
20,053 |
|
|
|
(1,757,539 |
) |
|
|
498,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders
equity |
|
$ |
1,794,521 |
|
|
$ |
2,175,322 |
|
|
$ |
36,581 |
|
|
$ |
(1,757,539 |
) |
|
$ |
2,248,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table represents our condensed consolidating statement of earnings for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Company (1) |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Amounts |
|
Processing and services revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
524,478 |
|
|
$ |
67,916 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
592,394 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
6,557 |
|
|
|
383,875 |
|
|
|
66,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
456,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
(6,557 |
) |
|
|
140,603 |
|
|
|
1,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,652 |
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
(18,845 |
) |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,218 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
and equity in earnings of
consolidated entities |
|
|
(25,402 |
) |
|
|
140,944 |
|
|
|
1,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,434 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(9,717 |
) |
|
|
53,911 |
|
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before equity in
earnings of consolidated
entities |
|
|
(15,685 |
) |
|
|
87,033 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,516 |
|
Equity in income of
consolidated entities, net of tax |
|
|
88,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88,201 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
72,516 |
|
|
$ |
87,033 |
|
|
$ |
1,168 |
|
|
$ |
(88,201 |
) |
|
$ |
72,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
The following table represents our condensed consolidating statement of cash flows for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Amounts |
|
Cash flows from
operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
72,516 |
|
|
$ |
87,033 |
|
|
$ |
1,168 |
|
|
$ |
(88,201 |
) |
|
$ |
72,516 |
|
Adjustment to
reconcile net
earnings to net
cash provided by
operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash expenses
and other items |
|
|
(79,435 |
) |
|
|
29,207 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
88,201 |
|
|
|
38,042 |
|
Changes in assets
and liabilities,
net of effects from
acquisitions |
|
|
(20,531 |
) |
|
|
13,276 |
|
|
|
5,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,518 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided
by operating
activities |
|
|
(27,450 |
) |
|
|
129,516 |
|
|
|
6,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,040 |
|
Net cash used in
investing
activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,044 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,044 |
) |
Net cash used in
financing
activities |
|
|
(25,586 |
) |
|
|
(2,978 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,564 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in
cash and cash
equivalents |
|
$ |
(53,036 |
) |
|
$ |
98,494 |
|
|
$ |
6,974 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
52,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents,
beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents, end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
122,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Parent Company does not allocate corporate overhead to the Subsidiary Guarantors or Other
Subsidiaries. |
(12) Subsequent Events
Management evaluated all activity of the Company and concluded that no subsequent events have
occurred, other than the announcement of a dividend and the share repurchases described below, that
would require recognition in the consolidated financial statements or disclosure in the notes to
consolidated financial statements.
Dividend Declared
On April 22, 2010, we announced a regular quarterly dividend of $0.10 per common share. The
dividend is payable on June 17, 2010, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on June
3, 2010.
Share Repurchases
Subsequent to March 31, 2010, we have repurchased 0.8 million shares of our stock for $30.7 million,
at an average price of $37.45 per share.
21
Except as otherwise indicated or unless the context otherwise requires, all references to
LPS, we, the Company, or the registrant are to Lender Processing Services, Inc., a Delaware
corporation that was incorporated in December 2007 as a wholly-owned subsidiary of FIS, and its
subsidiaries; all references to FIS, the former parent, or the holding company are to
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc., a Georgia corporation formerly known as Certegy Inc.,
and its subsidiaries, that owned all of LPSs shares until July 2, 2008; all references to former
FIS are to Fidelity National Information Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its
subsidiaries, prior to the merger of Certegy, Inc. and former FIS; all references to old FNF are
to Fidelity National Financial, Inc., a Delaware corporation that owned a majority of former FISs
shares through November 9, 2006; and all references to FNF are to Fidelity National Financial,
Inc. (formerly known as Fidelity National Title Group, Inc.), formerly a subsidiary of old FNF but
now a stand-alone company.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with Item 1: Consolidated Financial
Statements (Unaudited) and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this report. The discussion
below contains forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Those
forward-looking statements include all statements that are not historical facts, including
statements about our beliefs and expectations. Forward-looking statements are based on managements
beliefs, as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to management. Because
such statements are based on expectations as to future economic performance and are not statements
of historical fact, actual results may differ materially from those projected. We undertake no
obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise. The risks and uncertainties to which forward-looking statements are subject
include, but are not limited to: our ability to adapt our services to changes in technology or the
marketplace; the impact of adverse changes in the level of real estate activity on demand for
certain of our services; our ability to maintain and grow our relationships with our customers; the
effects of our substantial leverage on our ability to make acquisitions and invest in our business;
changes to the laws, rules and regulations that regulate our businesses as a result of the current
economic and financial environment; changes in general economic, business and political conditions,
including changes in the financial markets; the impact of any potential defects, development
delays, installation difficulties or system failures on our business and reputation; risks
associated with protecting information security and privacy; risks associated with our spin-off
from Fidelity National Information Services, Inc., including limitations on our strategic and
operating flexibility as a result of the tax-free nature of the spin-off; and other risks and
uncertainties detailed in the Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information, Risk Factors and
other sections of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K that was filed on February 23, 2010 and
our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Overview
We are a provider of integrated technology and services to the mortgage lending industry, with
market leading positions in mortgage processing and default management services in the U.S. We
conduct our operations through two reporting segments, Technology, Data and Analytics and Loan
Transaction Services, which produced approximately 30% and 70%, respectively, of our revenues for
the three months ended March 31, 2010. A large number of financial institutions use our services.
Our technology solutions include our mortgage processing system, which automates all areas of loan
servicing, from loan setup and ongoing processing to customer service, accounting and reporting.
Our technology solutions also include our Desktop system, which is a middleware enterprise workflow
management application designed to streamline and automate business processes. Our loan transaction
services include our default management services, which are used by mortgage lenders, servicers,
attorneys and trustees to reduce the expense of managing defaulted loans, and our loan facilitation
services, which support most aspects of the closing of mortgage loan transactions by national
lenders and loan servicers.
Our Technology, Data and Analytics segment principally includes:
|
|
|
our mortgage processing services, which we conduct using our mortgage servicing platform
and our team of experienced support personnel based primarily at our Jacksonville, Florida
data center; |
22
|
|
|
our Desktop application, a workflow system that assists our customers in managing business
processes, which today is primarily used in connection with mortgage loan default management,
but which has broader applications; |
|
|
|
|
our other software and related service offerings, including our mortgage origination
software, our real estate
closing and title insurance production software and our collaborative electronic vendor network,
which provides connectivity among mortgage industry participants; and |
|
|
|
|
our data and analytics businesses, the most significant of which are our alternative
property valuations business, which provides a range of valuations other than traditional
appraisals, our aggregated property and loan data services, our fraud detection solutions and
our advanced analytic services, which assist our customers in their loan marketing, loss
mitigation and fraud prevention efforts. |
Our Loan Transaction Services segment offers a range of services used mainly in the production
of a mortgage loan, which we refer to as our loan facilitation services, and in the management of
mortgage loans that go into default, which we refer to as default management services.
Our loan facilitation services include:
|
|
|
settlement services, which consist of title agency services, in which we act as an agent
for title insurers, and closing services, in which we assist in the closing of real estate
transactions; |
|
|
|
|
appraisal services, which consist of traditional appraisal and appraisal management
services; and |
|
|
|
|
other origination services, which consist of flood zone information, which assists lenders
in determining whether a property is in a federally designated flood zone, and real estate
tax services, which provide lenders with information about the tax status of a property. |
Our default management services include, among others:
|
|
|
foreclosure management services, including administrative services to a nationwide network
of independent attorneys and trustees, mandatory title searches, posting and publishing, and
other services; |
|
|
|
|
property inspection and preservation services, designed to preserve the value of properties
securing defaulted loans; and |
|
|
|
|
asset management services, providing disposition services for our customers real estate
owned properties through a network of independent real estate brokers, attorneys and other
vendors to facilitate the transaction. |
Corporate overhead costs, including stock compensation expense, and other operations that are
not included in our operating segments are included in Corporate and Other.
Recent Trends and Developments
Revenues in our loan facilitation businesses and certain of our data businesses are closely
related to the level of residential real estate activity in the U.S., which includes sales,
mortgage financing and mortgage refinancing. The level of real estate activity is primarily
affected by real estate prices, the availability of funds for mortgage loans, mortgage interest
rates and the overall state of the U.S. economy. As a result of the declining housing market and
the current economic downturn, the volume of refinancing transactions in particular and mortgage
originations in general have declined over the last several years, most sharply in late 2007 and
2008, resulting in a reduction of revenues in some of our businesses. Various measures taken by the
federal government to reduce interest rates led to increased refinancing activity beginning in the
fourth quarter of 2008 through much of 2009. However, refinancing activity declined in late 2009
through the first quarter of 2010. Nevertheless, we were able to increase revenues from our loan
facilitation services in the first quarter of 2010 as a result of market share gains.
23
Other steps taken by the U.S. government to relieve the current economic situation may have a
positive effect on our refinancing activity. Under the Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan
(the HASP) homeowners with a
solid payment history on an existing mortgage owned by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, who would
otherwise be unable to get a refinancing loan because of a loss in home value increasing their
loan-to-value ratio above 80%, would be able to get a refinancing loan. The Treasury Department
estimates that many of the 4 to 5 million homeowners who fit this description are eligible to
refinance their loans under this program.
According to the Mortgage Bankers Associations (MBA) current Mortgage Finance Forecast,
U.S. mortgage originations (including refinancing) were approximately $2.1 trillion and $1.5
trillion in 2009 and 2008, respectively. The MBAs Mortgage Finance Forecast currently estimates an
approximately $1.3 trillion mortgage origination market for 2010. The MBA further forecasts that
this decrease will result primarily from less refinancing activity. The MBA estimates that loan
origination volumes in the first quarter of 2010 were approximately 4% lower than the first quarter
of 2009.
Our various businesses are impacted differently by the level of mortgage originations and
refinancing transactions. For instance, while our loan facilitation and some of our data businesses
are directly affected by the volume of real estate transactions and mortgage originations, our
mortgage processing business is generally less affected because it earns revenues based on the
total number of mortgage loans it processes, which tends to stay more constant.
In contrast, we believe that a weaker economy tends to increase the volume of consumer
mortgage defaults, and thus favorably affects our default management operations, in which we
service residential mortgage loans in default. These factors also increase revenues from our
Desktop solution, as the Desktop application, at present, is primarily used in connection with
default management. However, the same government legislation aimed at mitigating the current
downturn in the housing market that may have a positive effect on our refinancing
activity adversely affects our default management operations. In addition to providing refinancing
opportunities for borrowers who are current on their mortgage payments but have been unable to
refinance because their homes have decreased in value, the HASP also provides for a loan
modification program targeted at borrowers who are at risk of foreclosure because their incomes are
not sufficient to make their mortgage payments. The Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP)
under the HASP is designed to help as many as 3 to 4 million homeowners avoid foreclosure by
providing affordable and sustainable mortgage loans over the next several years. It uses cost
sharing and incentives to encourage lenders to reduce homeowners monthly payments to 31 percent of
their gross monthly income. Through the end of the first quarter of 2010, the Treasury estimates
that banks had worked through most of the approximately 1.7 million loans currently eligible for
the program, with 1.4 million trial modifications having been offered, 1.2 million actually being
implemented and 230,000 of the trial modifications becoming permanent. Although we believe that
HAMP has had an adverse effect on our default management revenues
(and may continue to have a negative effect in the future as
additional mortgages become eligible under the programs current criteria or if those criteria are
broadened), the pace of modifications has slowed in the first quarter of 2010, from 89,000 in
January to 57,000 in March, indicating a lessened impact going forward. However, we cannot predict
the ultimate impact that the HASP and other foreclosure relief and loan
modification initiatives, as well as other current or future governmental initiatives to stimulate the
economy and increase the flow of credit, may have on our various businesses.
Notwithstanding the effects of existing government programs, we believe that the inventory of
delinquent mortgage loans and loans in foreclosure continues to grow.
We believe this growth is due in part to lenders focusing their
resources on trying to make
modifications under the HAMP program in recent quarters. In addition, delinquency rates remain high. These factors
suggest that the size of the overall default market is likely to increase over the next year, which
should in turn have a positive effect on our default revenues.
We have approximately $1,288.1 million in long-term debt outstanding as of March 31, 2010, of
which approximately $1,027.0 million bears interest at a fixed rate ($660.0 million through
interest rate swaps), while the remaining portion bears interest at a floating rate. As a result of
our current level of debt, we are highly leveraged and subject to risk from changes in interest
rates. Having this amount of debt also makes us more susceptible to
24
negative economic changes, as a large portion of our cash is committed to servicing our debt.
Therefore, in a bad economy or if interest rates rise, it may be harder for us to attract executive
talent, invest in acquisitions or new ventures, or develop new services.
In a number of our business lines, we are also affected by the decisions of potential
customers to outsource the types of functions our businesses provide or to perform those functions
internally. Generally, demand for outsourcing solutions has increased over time as providers such
as us realize economies of scale and improve their ability to provide services that increase
customer efficiencies, reduce costs, improve processing transparency and improve risk management.
Further, in a slow economy or struggling mortgage market, we believe that larger financial
institutions may seek additional outsourcing solutions to avoid the fixed costs of operating or
investing in internal capabilities. We have continued to gain new customers, including three
significant new conversions to our Desktop application which were in the implementation phase in
the first quarter of 2010, which should enhance our positioning to take advantage of any increase
in foreclosure volumes.
Some states have also enacted legislation requiring the registration of appraisal management
companies, and additional legislation has been proposed at the federal level. Other state
legislative proposals are pending concerning the regulation of certain appraisal management
practices. It is too early to predict with certainty what impact these measures may have on our
business or the results of our operations.
Factors Affecting Comparability
There have been no significant transactions that affect the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
Critical Accounting Policies
There have been no significant changes to our critical accounting policies since our Annual
Report on Form 10-K was filed on February 23, 2010.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance changing
disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are
issued or available to be issued. The changes clarified that an entity that is required to file or
furnish its financial statements with the SEC is not required to disclose the date through which
subsequent events have been evaluated. The adoption of the guidance did not materially affect the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued guidance changing disclosure requirements for fair value
measurements. The changes require a reporting entity to disclose separately the amounts of
significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the
reasons for the transfers. The changes also clarify existing disclosure requirements related to how
assets and liabilities should be grouped by class and valuation techniques used for recurring and
nonrecurring fair value measurements. The adoption of the guidance did not materially affect the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued guidance eliminating the requirement that all undelivered
elements have Vendor Specific Objective Evidence (VSOE) or Third-Party Evidence (TPE) of
standalone selling price before an entity can recognize the portion of an overall arrangement fee
that is attributable to items that have been delivered. In the absence of VSOE or TPE of the
standalone selling price for one or more delivered or undelivered elements in a multiple-element
arrangement, entities will be required to estimate the selling prices of those elements. The
overall arrangement fee will be allocated to each element (both delivered and undelivered items)
based on their relative selling prices, regardless of whether those selling prices are evidenced by
VSOE or TPE or are based on the entitys estimated selling price. Application of the residual
method of allocating an overall arrangement fee between delivered and undelivered elements will no
longer be permitted upon adoption of this new guidance.
Additional disclosure will be required about multiple-element revenue arrangements, as well as
qualitative and quantitative disclosure about the effect of the change. The amendment is effective
prospectively for revenue
25
arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years
beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the new
guidance, but does not believe it will materially affect the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
Related Party Transactions
We have historically conducted business with FIS and its subsidiaries, FNF and its
subsidiaries, and other related parties. See note 3 to the notes to consolidated financial
statements for a detailed description of all related party transactions.
Results of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
The following tables reflect certain amounts included in operating income in our consolidated
condensed statements of earnings, the relative percentage of those amounts to total revenues, and
the change in those amounts from the comparable prior year period.
Consolidated Condensed Results of Operations Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Revenue (1) (2) |
|
|
Variance 2010 vs. 2009 (1) (2) |
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 (1) |
|
|
2009 (1) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Processing and services revenues |
|
$ |
592.4 |
|
|
$ |
529.8 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
62.6 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
% |
Cost of revenues |
|
|
396.0 |
|
|
|
354.7 |
|
|
|
66.8 |
% |
|
|
66.9 |
% |
|
|
(41.3 |
) |
|
|
(11.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
196.4 |
|
|
|
175.1 |
|
|
|
33.2 |
% |
|
|
33.1 |
% |
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
33.2 |
% |
|
|
33.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
60.7 |
|
|
|
71.2 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
% |
|
|
13.5 |
% |
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
135.7 |
|
|
|
103.9 |
|
|
|
22.9 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
31.8 |
|
|
|
30.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin |
|
|
22.9 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
(18.2 |
) |
|
|
(21.4 |
) |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing
operations before income taxes
and equity in losses of
unconsolidated entity |
|
|
117.4 |
|
|
|
82.5 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
% |
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
34.9 |
|
|
|
42.3 |
% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
44.9 |
|
|
|
31.6 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
(13.3 |
) |
|
|
(42.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing
operations before equity in
losses of unconsolidated
entity, discontinued operation
and noncontrolling minority
interest |
|
|
72.5 |
|
|
|
50.9 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
42.4 |
% |
Equity in losses of
unconsolidated entity,
discontinued operation and
noncontrolling minority
interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
nm |
|
|
nm |
|
|
nm |
|
|
nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to
Lender Processing Services,
Inc. |
|
$ |
72.5 |
|
|
$ |
50.0 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
$ |
22.5 |
|
|
|
45.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share
attributable to Lender
Processing Services, Inc.
diluted |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Columns may not total due to rounding. |
|
(2) |
|
Certain operating items are not material as a percentage of revenues, as indicated by nm. |
Processing and Services Revenues
Processing and services revenues increased $62.6 million, or 11.8%, during the first quarter
of 2010 when compared to the first quarter of 2009. The increase was driven by growth in both our
Loan Transaction Services and our Technology, Data and Analytics segments. The increase in our Loan
Transactions Services segment during the quarter resulted in part from growth in our loan facilitation
services, which include our front-end loan origination related
services. This growth was due to strong market share gains in title and appraisal services driven by
our continued expansion into the wholesale and broker channels. We also benefited from growth in our
default management services due to continued market share gains. The increase in our Technology,
Data and Analytics segment during the quarter was primarily driven by continued demand for our
Desktop application, valuation solutions and applied analytics services, as well
26
as from growth in
our mortgage processing operation, due to an increase in the number of loans serviced as a result
of the conversion of JPMorgan Chases portfolio during the third quarter of 2009, and an increase
in activity-based fees.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues increased $41.3 million, or 11.6%, during the first quarter of 2010 when
compared to the first quarter of 2009. Cost of revenues as a percentage of processing and services
revenues decreased from 66.9% during the first quarter of 2009 to 66.8% in the same period of 2010.
The dollar increase was primarily driven by the revenue increases described above, continued
investments in our mortgage processing and Desktop technology platforms, and the expansion of our
Desktop infrastructure in advance of several customer implementations scheduled for 2010.
Gross Profit
Gross profit was $196.4 million and $175.1 million during the first quarter of 2010 and 2009,
respectively. Gross profit as a percentage of processing and services revenues (gross margin) was
33.2% and 33.1% during the first quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively. The nominal increase in
gross margin during the first quarter of 2010 when compared to the first quarter of 2009 was a
result of the factors described above.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $10.5 million, or 14.7%, during the
first quarter of 2010 when compared to the first quarter of 2009. Selling, general and
administrative expenses as a percentage of processing and services revenues were 10.2% and 13.5%
during the first quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively. The decrease in selling, general and
administrative expenses was primarily due to a $6.8 million charge recognized during the first
quarter of 2009 related to the retirement of three LPS directors, as well as other one-time
restructuring costs totaling $2.2 million that were recognized in the first quarter of 2009.
Operating Income
Operating income increased $31.8 million, or 30.6%, during the first quarter of 2010 when
compared to the first quarter of 2009. Operating income as a percentage of processing and services
revenues (operating margin) increased from 19.6% during the first quarter of 2009 to 22.9% in the
first quarter of 2010 as a result of the factors described above.
Other Income (Expense)
Other income and expense consists of interest income, interest expense and other items. The
net expense was $18.2 million and $21.4 million during the first quarter of 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The change during the first quarter of 2010 when compared to the first quarter of
2009 was primarily due to a decrease in interest expense resulting from lower interest rates and
principal balances. Interest expense was $18.8 million and $21.9 million during the first quarter
of 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Income Taxes
Income taxes were $44.9 million and $31.6 million during the first quarter of 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The effective tax rate was 38.25% and 38.25% during the first quarter of 2010 and
2009, respectively.
Equity in Losses of Unconsolidated Entity, Discontinued Operation and Noncontrolling Minority
Interest, Net
Equity in losses of unconsolidated entity, discontinued operation and noncontrolling
minority interest, net was $0.9 million during the first quarter of 2009.
27
Net Earnings and Net Earnings Per Share Attributable to LPS Diluted
Net earnings were $72.5 million and $50.0 million during the first quarter of 2010 and 2009,
respectively. Net earnings per diluted share totaled $0.75 and $0.53 during the first quarter of
2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase during the first quarter of 2010 when compared to the
first quarter of 2009 was a result of the factors described above.
Segment Results of Operations Technology, Data and Analytics Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Revenue (1) |
|
|
Variance 2010 vs. 2009 (1) |
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 (1) |
|
|
2009 (1) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Processing and services revenues |
|
$ |
179.5 |
|
|
$ |
159.9 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
19.6 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
% |
Cost of revenues |
|
|
105.8 |
|
|
|
90.5 |
|
|
|
58.9 |
% |
|
|
56.6 |
% |
|
|
(15.3 |
) |
|
|
(16.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
73.7 |
|
|
|
69.4 |
|
|
|
41.1 |
% |
|
|
43.4 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
41.1 |
% |
|
|
43.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
(23.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
53.9 |
|
|
$ |
53.4 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
% |
|
|
33.3 |
% |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin |
|
|
30.0 |
% |
|
|
33.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Columns may not total due to rounding. |
Processing and Services Revenues
Processing and services revenues increased $19.6 million, or 12.3%, during the first quarter
of 2010 when compared to the first quarter of 2009. The increase during the first quarter of 2010
was primarily driven by growth in our mortgage processing operation. Our MSP revenues increased
7.1% during the quarter largely due to an increase in the number of loans serviced as a result of
the conversion of JPMorgan Chases portfolio during the third quarter of 2009, and an increase in
activity-based fees. Additionally, continued demand for our Desktop application, valuation
solutions and applied analytics services contributed to revenue growth during the current quarter.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues increased $15.3 million, or 16.9%, during the first quarter of 2010 when
compared to the first quarter of 2009. Cost of revenues as a percentage of processing and services
revenues increased from 56.6% during the first quarter of 2009 to 58.9% in the first quarter of
2010. The increase was primarily driven by continued investments in our mortgage processing and
Desktop technology platforms and the expansion of our Desktop infrastructure in advance of several
customer implementations scheduled for 2010.
Gross Profit
Gross profit was $73.7 million and $69.4 million during the first quarter of 2010 and 2009,
respectively. Gross margin was 41.1% and 43.4% during the first quarter of 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The decline in gross margin during the first quarter of 2010 when compared to the
first quarter of 2009 was a result of the factors described above.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses totaled $19.8 million and $16.1 million during
the first quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively. As a percentage of processing and services
revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses increased from 10.1% during the first
quarter of 2009 to 11.0% in the first quarter of 2010 as a result of increasing personnel costs.
28
Operating Income
Operating income increased $0.5 million, or 0.9%, during the first quarter of 2010 when
compared to the first quarter of 2009. Operating margin decreased from 33.3% during the first
quarter of 2009 to 30.0% in the first quarter of 2010 as a result of the factors described above.
Segment Results of Operations Loan Transaction Services Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Revenue (1) |
|
|
Variance 2010 vs. 2009 (1) |
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 (1) |
|
|
2009 (1) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Processing and services revenues |
|
$ |
415.3 |
|
|
$ |
374.5 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
40.8 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
% |
Cost of revenues |
|
|
292.6 |
|
|
|
268.9 |
|
|
|
70.5 |
% |
|
|
71.8 |
% |
|
|
(23.7 |
) |
|
|
(8.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
122.7 |
|
|
|
105.6 |
|
|
|
29.5 |
% |
|
|
28.2 |
% |
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
29.5 |
% |
|
|
28.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
98.8 |
|
|
$ |
78.2 |
|
|
|
23.8 |
% |
|
|
20.9 |
% |
|
$ |
20.6 |
|
|
|
26.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin |
|
|
23.8 |
% |
|
|
20.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Columns may not total due to rounding. |
Processing and Services Revenues
Processing and services revenues increased $40.8 million, or 10.9%, during the first quarter
of 2010 when compared to the first quarter of 2009. The increase during the first quarter of 2010
resulted from 23.0% growth in our loan facilitation services, which include our front-end loan
origination related services, due to strong market share gains in title and appraisal services
driven by our continued expansion into the wholesale and broker channels, notwithstanding a
year-over-year decline in mortgage market activity. Additionally, our default management services
grew by 5.2% during the current year quarter primarily due to market share gains.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues increased $23.7 million, or 8.8%, during the first quarter of 2010 when
compared to the first quarter of 2009. Cost of revenues as a percentage of processing and services
revenues decreased from 71.8% during the first quarter of 2009 to 70.5% in the first quarter of
2010. The decrease during the first quarter of 2010 was primarily due to the operating leverage in
several of our loan facilitation services operations which experienced significant revenue growth
as compared to the prior year quarter.
Gross Profit
Gross profit was $122.7 million and $105.6 million during the first quarter of 2010 and 2009,
respectively. Gross margin was 29.5% and 28.2% during the first quarter of 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The increase in gross margin during the first quarter of 2010 when compared to the
first quarter of 2009 was a result of the factors described above.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses totaled $23.9 million and $27.4 million during
the first quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively. As a percentage of processing and services
revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased from 7.3% during the first quarter
of 2009 to 5.8% in the first quarter of 2010 as a result of declining personnel costs.
Operating Income
Operating income increased $20.6 million, or 26.3%, during the first quarter of 2010 when
compared to the first quarter of 2009. Operating margin increased from 20.9% during the first
quarter of 2009 to 23.8% in the first quarter of 2010 as a result of the factors described above.
29
Segment Results of Operations Corporate and Other
The Corporate and Other segment consists of corporate overhead costs that are not included in
the other segments as well as certain smaller operations. Net expenses for this segment were $17.0
million and $27.6 million during the first quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively. The decrease in
net corporate expenses during the first quarter of 2010 as compared to the first quarter of 2009
was primarily due to a $6.8 million charge recognized during the first quarter of 2009 related to
the retirement of three LPS directors, as well as other one-time restructuring costs that were
recognized in the first quarter of 2009. Stock related compensation costs were $6.6 million and
$6.8 million during the first quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Requirements
Our cash requirements include cost of revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses,
income taxes, debt service payments, capital expenditures, systems development expenditures,
stockholder dividends, and business acquisitions. Our principal sources of funds are cash generated
by operations.
At March 31, 2010, we had cash on hand of $123.0 million and debt of $1,288.1 million,
including the current portion. We expect that cash flows from operations over the next twelve
months will be sufficient to fund our operating cash requirements and pay principal and interest on
our outstanding debt absent any unusual circumstances such as adverse changes in the business
environment.
We currently pay a dividend of $0.10 per common share on a quarterly basis and expect to
continue to do so in the future. The declaration and payment of future dividends is at the
discretion of the Board of Directors, and depends on, among other things, our investment policy and
opportunities, results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements, future prospects, and
other factors, including legal and contractual restrictions, that may be considered relevant by our
Board of Directors. Additionally, the payment of cash dividends may be limited by covenants in
certain debt agreements. A regular quarterly dividend of $0.10 per common share is payable June 17,
2010 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on June 3, 2010. We continually assess
our capital allocation strategy, including decisions relating to the amount of our dividend,
reduction of debt, repurchases of our stock and the making of select acquisitions.
We intend to limit dilution caused by option exercises, including anticipated exercises, by
repurchasing shares on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. On June 18, 2009,
our Board of Directors approved a plan authorizing repurchases of common stock and/or senior notes
of up to $75.0 million, of which $50.0 million was available to repurchase our senior notes. On
February 5, 2010, our Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase shares of our common stock
and/or our senior notes in an amount not to exceed $150.0 million. This new authorization replaces
the previous authorization and subsumes all amounts remaining available thereunder. The new plan is
effective through March 31, 2012. Our ability to repurchase shares of common stock or senior notes
is subject to restrictions contained in our senior secured credit agreement and in the indenture
governing our senior unsecured notes. During the first quarter, we repurchased 1.0 million shares
of our stock for $40.3 million, at an average price of $39.50 per share. As of March 31, 2010, we
had $126.1 million remaining available for repurchases under our $150.0 million authorization
approved by our Board of Directors on February 5, 2010. Subsequent to March 31, 2010, we have
repurchased 0.8 million shares of our stock for $30.7 million, at an average price of $37.45 per share.
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities reflects net income adjusted for certain non-cash items
and changes in certain assets and liabilities. Cash provided by operating activities was
approximately $109.0 million and $75.4 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009, respectively. The increase in cash provided by operating activities during the first quarter
of 2010 when compared to the first quarter of 2009 was primarily
30
related to an increase in
earnings, as adjusted for noncash items, as well as improved management of our net working capital.
Investing Activities
Investing cash flows consist primarily of capital expenditures and acquisitions and
dispositions. Cash used in investing activities was approximately $28.0 million and $60.5 million
during the three months ended March 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively. The decrease in cash used in investing activities during the
first quarter of 2010 when compared to the prior year quarter was primarily related to the
acquisition of the remaining 61% of the equity interest of FNRES, in February 2009, in exchange for
all of our interests in IPEX. In connection with this transaction, we exchanged the net assets of
IPEX, which included approximately $32.6 million of cash and cash equivalents, for the net assets
of FNRES, which included approximately $0.5 million of cash and cash equivalents.
Our principal capital expenditures are for computer software (purchased and internally
developed) and additions to property and equipment. We spent approximately $28.0 million and $22.6
million on capital expenditures during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Financing Activities
Cash used in financing activities was approximately $28.6 million and $83.8 million during the
three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The decrease in cash used in financing
activities during the first quarter of 2010 when compared to the prior year quarter was primarily
related to a prepayment of future debt installments made during the first quarter of 2009, and an
increase in stock option exercises and restricted stock vesting during the current year quarter,
partially offset by an increase in the level of treasury share repurchases.
Financing
On July 2, 2008, we entered into a Credit Agreement (the Credit Agreement) among JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and Letters of Credit Issuer and
various other lenders who are parties to the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement consists of:
(i) a 5-year revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount outstanding at any time not
to exceed $140.0 million (with a $25.0 million sub-facility for Letters of Credit) under which no
borrowings were outstanding at March 31, 2010; (ii) a Term A Loan in an initial aggregate principal
amount of $700.0 million under which $420.0 million was outstanding at March 31, 2010; and (iii) a
Term B Loan in an initial aggregate principal amount of $510.0 million under which $501.1 million
was outstanding at March 31, 2010. Proceeds from disbursements under the 5-year revolving credit
facility are to be used for general corporate purposes.
The loans under the Credit Agreement bear interest at a floating rate, which is an applicable
margin plus, at our option, either (a) the Eurodollar (LIBOR) rate or (b) the higher of (i) the
prime rate or (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.5% (the higher of clauses (i) and (ii), the ABR
rate). The annual margin on the Term A Loan and the revolving credit facility is a percentage per
annum to be determined in accordance with a leverage ratio-based pricing grid and on the Term B
Loan is 2.5% in the case of LIBOR loans and 1.5% in the case of ABR rate loans. At March 31, 2010,
the rate on the Term A Loan was 2.25% and the rate on the Term B Loan was 2.75%.
In addition to the scheduled principal payments, the Term Loans are (with certain exceptions)
subject to mandatory prepayment upon issuances of debt, casualty and condemnation events, and sales
of assets, as well as from up to 50% of excess cash flow (as defined in the Credit Agreement) in
excess of an agreed threshold commencing with the cash flow for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Voluntary prepayments of the loans are generally permitted at any time without fee upon proper
notice and subject to a minimum dollar requirement. Commitment reductions of the revolving credit
facility are also permitted at any time without fee upon proper notice. The revolving credit
facility has no scheduled principal payments, but it will be due and payable in full on July 2,
2013.
31
The obligations under the Credit Agreement are jointly and severally, unconditionally
guaranteed by certain of our domestic subsidiaries. Additionally, the Company and such subsidiary
guarantors pledged substantially all of our respective assets as collateral security for the
obligations under the Credit Agreement and our respective guarantees.
The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative, negative and financial covenants
including, among other things, limits on the creation of liens, limits on the incurrence of
indebtedness, restrictions on investments and dispositions, limits on the payment of dividends and
other restricted payments, a minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum leverage ratio. Upon an
event of default, the administrative agent can accelerate the maturity of the loan. Events of
default include events customary for such an agreement, including failure to pay principal and
interest in a timely manner and breach of covenants. These events of default include a
cross-default provision that permits the lenders to declare the Credit Agreement in default if (i)
we fail to make any payment after the applicable
grace period under any indebtedness with a principal amount in excess of a specified amount or
(ii) we fail to perform any other term under any such indebtedness, as a result of which the
holders thereof may cause it to become due and payable prior to its maturity.
On July 2, 2008, we issued senior notes (the Notes) in an initial aggregate principal amount
of $375.0 million under which $367.0 million was outstanding at March 31, 2010. The Notes were
issued pursuant to an Indenture dated July 2, 2008 (the Indenture) among the Company, the
guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Services, as Trustee.
The Notes bear interest at a rate of 8.125% per annum. Interest payments are due semi-annually
each January 1 and July 1. The maturity date of the Notes is July 1, 2016. From time to time we may
be in the market to repurchase portions of the Notes, subject to limitations set forth in the
Credit Agreement.
The Notes are our general unsecured obligations. Accordingly, they rank equally in right of
payment with all of our existing and future unsecured senior debt; senior in right of payment to
all of our future subordinated debt; effectively subordinated to our existing and future secured
debt to the extent of the assets securing such debt, including all borrowings under our credit
facilities; and effectively subordinated to all of the liabilities of our non-guarantor
subsidiaries, including trade payables and preferred stock.
The Notes are guaranteed by each existing and future domestic subsidiary that is a guarantor
under our credit facilities. The guarantees are general unsecured obligations of the guarantors.
Accordingly, they rank equally in right of payment with all existing and future unsecured senior
debt of our guarantors; senior in right of payment with all existing and future subordinated debt
of such guarantors; and effectively subordinated to such guarantors existing and future secured
debt to the extent of the assets securing such debt, including the guarantees by the guarantors of
obligations under our credit facilities.
We may redeem some or all of the Notes on or after July 1, 2011, at the redemption prices
described in the Indenture, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Upon the occurrence of a change of
control, unless we have exercised our right to redeem all of the Notes as described above, each
holder may require us to repurchase such holders Notes, in whole or in part, at a purchase price
equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest to the purchase
date.
The Indenture contains customary events of default, including a cross default provision that,
with respect to any other debt of the Company or any of our restricted subsidiaries having an
outstanding principal amount equal to or more than a specified amount in the aggregate for all such
debt, occurs upon (i) an event of default that results in such debt being due and payable prior to
its scheduled maturity or (ii) failure to make a principal payment. Upon the occurrence of an event
of default (other than a bankruptcy default with respect to the Company), the trustee or holders of
at least 25% of the Notes then outstanding may accelerate the Notes by giving us appropriate
notice. If, however, a bankruptcy default occurs with respect to the Company, then the principal of
and accrued interest on the Notes then outstanding will accelerate immediately without any
declaration or other act on the part of the trustee or any holder.
Interest Rate Swaps
See note 6 to the notes to consolidated financial statements for a detailed description of our
interest rate swaps.
32
Contractual Obligations
There have been no significant changes to our principal maturities since our Annual Report on
Form 10-K was filed on February 23, 2010.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements other than operating leases and the
escrow arrangements described below.
Escrow Arrangements
In conducting our title agency, closing and tax services, we routinely hold customers assets
in escrow accounts, pending completion of real estate related transactions. Certain of these
amounts are maintained in segregated accounts, and these amounts have not been included in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets. As an incentive for holding deposits at certain banks, we
periodically have programs for realizing economic benefits through favorable arrangements with
these banks. As of March 31, 2010, the aggregate value of all amounts held in escrow in our title
agency, closing and tax services operations totaled $255.3 million.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
In the normal course of business, we are routinely subject to a variety of risks, including
those described in the Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information, Risk Factors and other
sections of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K that was filed on February 23, 2010 and our
other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. For example, we are exposed to the risk
that decreased lending and real estate activity, which depend in part on the level of interest
rates, may reduce demand for certain of our services and adversely affect our results of
operations. The risks related to our business also include certain market risks that may affect our
debt and other financial instruments. In particular, we face the market risks associated with our
cash equivalents and interest rate movements on our outstanding debt. We regularly assess market
risks and have established policies and business practices to protect against the adverse effects
of these exposures.
Our cash equivalents are predominantly invested with high credit quality financial
institutions, and consist of short-term investments such as money market accounts, money market
funds and time deposits.
We are a highly leveraged company, with approximately $1,288.1 million in long-term debt
outstanding as of March 31, 2010. We have entered into interest rate swap transactions which
converted a portion of the interest rate exposure on our floating rate debt from variable to fixed.
We performed a sensitivity analysis based on the principal amount of our floating rate debt as of
March 31, 2010, less the principal amount of such debt that was then subject to an interest rate
swap. This sensitivity analysis takes into account scheduled principal installments that will take
place in the next 12 months as well as the related notional amount of interest rate swaps then
outstanding. Further, in this sensitivity analysis, the change in interest rates is assumed to be
applicable for the entire year. Of the remaining variable rate debt not covered by the swap
arrangements, we estimate that a one percent increase in the LIBOR rate would increase our annual
interest expense by approximately $5.5 million.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation,
under the supervision and with the participation of its principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and
procedures, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Act). Based on this evaluation, the Companys principal executive officer and
principal financial officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or
submits under the Act is: (a) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods
specified in the Commissions
33
rules and forms; and (b) accumulated and communicated to management,
including the Companys principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Part II: OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
Litigation
In the ordinary course of business, we are involved in various pending and threatened
litigation matters related to our operations, some of which include claims for punitive or
exemplary damages. Often, these matters do not
include a specific statement as to the dollar amount of damages demanded. Instead, they
include a demand in an amount to be proved at trial. For these reasons, it is often not possible to
make a meaningful estimate of the amount or range of loss that could result from these matters.
Accordingly, we review matters on an ongoing basis when making accrual and disclosure decisions.
When assessing reasonably possible and probable outcomes, we base our decision on our assessment of
the ultimate outcome following all appeals. We intend to vigorously defend all litigation matters
that are brought against us, and we do not believe that the ultimate disposition of any of these
lawsuits will have a material adverse impact on our financial position or results of operations.
Finally, we believe that no actions, other than the matter listed below, depart from customary
litigation incidental to our business.
Schneider, Kenneth, et al. vs. Lender Processing Services, Inc., et al.
On February 17, 2010, this putative class action complaint was filed in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Florida. In a single count complaint, the plaintiffs
sought to recover unspecified damages for alleged violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices
Act relating to the preparation and use of assignments of mortgage in foreclosure actions. The
defendants included two large banks, as well as LPS and our document solutions subsidiary. The
complaint essentially alleged that the industry practice of creating assignments of mortgages after
the actual date on which a loan was transferred from one beneficial owner to another is unlawful.
The complaint also challenged the authority of individuals employed by our document solutions
subsidiary to execute such assignments as officers of various banks and mortgage companies. On
February 26, 2010, this case was voluntarily dismissed.
Regulatory Matters
Due to the heavily regulated nature of the mortgage industry, from time to time we receive
inquiries and requests for information from various state and federal regulatory agencies,
including state insurance departments, attorneys general and other agencies, about various matters
relating to our business. These inquiries take various forms, including informal or formal
requests, reviews, investigations and subpoenas. We attempt to cooperate with all such inquiries.
Recently, during an internal review of the business processes used by our document solutions
subsidiary, we identified a business process that caused an error in the notarization of certain
documents, some of which were used in foreclosure proceedings in various jurisdictions around the
country. The services performed by this subsidiary were offered to a limited number of customers,
were unrelated to our core default management services and were immaterial to our financial
results. We immediately corrected the business process and began to take remedial actions necessary
to cure the defect in an effort to minimize the impact of the error. We subsequently received an
inquiry relating to this matter from the Clerk of Court of Fulton County, Georgia, which is the
regulatory body responsible for licensing the notaries used by our document solutions subsidiary.
In response, we met with the Clerk of Court, along with members of her staff, and reported on our
identification of the error and the status of the corrective actions that were underway. We have
since completed our remediation efforts with respect to the affected documents, and we believe that
the matter with the Clerk of Court is closed. Most recently, we have learned that the U.S.
Attorneys office for the Middle District of Florida is reviewing the business processes of this
34
subsidiary. We have expressed our willingness to fully cooperate with the U.S. Attorney. We
continue to believe that we have taken necessary remedial action with respect to this matter.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On June 18, 2009, our Board of Directors approved a plan authorizing repurchases of common
stock and/or senior notes of up to $75.0 million, of which $50.0 million was available to
repurchase our senior notes. On February 5, 2010, our Board of Directors authorized us to
repurchase shares of our common stock and/or our senior notes in an amount not to exceed $150.0
million. This new authorization replaces the previous authorization and subsumes all amounts
remaining available thereunder. The new plan is effective through March 31, 2012. Our ability to
repurchase shares of common stock or senior notes is subject to restrictions contained in our
senior secured credit agreement and in the indenture governing our senior unsecured notes.
The following table summarizes our repurchase activity as of March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Dollar Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
(in millions) of |
|
|
Total |
|
Average |
|
Purchased |
|
Shares that |
|
|
Number of |
|
Price |
|
as Part |
|
May Yet Be |
|
|
Shares |
|
Paid per |
|
of Publicly |
|
Purchased Under |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
Share |
|
Announced Plans |
|
the Plans (1) |
January 1 to
January 31, 2010 |
|
|
406,000 |
|
|
$ |
40.48 |
|
|
|
406,000 |
|
|
$ |
27.6 |
(2) |
February 1 to
February 28, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
150.0 |
(3) |
March 1 to March
31, 2010 |
|
|
614,711 |
|
|
$ |
38.85 |
|
|
|
614,711 |
|
|
$ |
126.1 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,020,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,020,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of the last day of the respective month. |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects the amount remaining available under the $75.0 million authorization approved by our
Board of Directors on June 18, 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
Reflects the amount remaining available under the $150.0 million authorization approved by
our Board of Directors on February 5, 2010. |
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits:
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer of Periodic Financial Reports pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
|
32.2 |
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Financial Reports pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
35
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 6, 2010 |
Lender Processing Services, Inc.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ FRANCIS K. CHAN
|
|
|
|
Francis K. Chan |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
36
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC.
FORM 10-Q
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The following documents are being filed with this Report:
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
31.1
|
|
Certification of Jeffrey S. Carbiener, Chief Executive Officer of Lender Processing Services,
Inc., pursuant to rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Francis K. Chan, Chief Financial Officer of Lender Processing Services,
Inc., pursuant to rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Jeffrey S. Carbiener, Chief Executive Officer of Lender Processing Services,
Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Francis K. Chan, Chief Financial Officer of Lender Processing Services,
Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
37