e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
þ ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For
the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
or
|
|
|
o TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For
the Transition Period
From To
|
Commission File Number:
000-30421
HANMI FINANCIAL
CORPORATION
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
95-4788120
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification
No.)
|
3660 Wilshire
Boulevard, Penthouse Suite A
Los Angeles, California
|
|
90010
|
(Address of Principal Executive
Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
(213) 382-2200
(Registrants
Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of
Each Class
|
|
Name of Each
Exchange on Which Registered
|
Common Stock, $.001 Par Value
|
|
NASDAQ Global Select Market
|
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
(Title
of Class)
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this Form
10-K or any
amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
As of June 29, 2007, the aggregate market value of the
common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was
approximately $684,296,000. For purposes of the foregoing
calculation only, in addition to affiliated companies, all
directors and officers of the Registrant have been deemed
affiliates.
Number of shares of common stock of the Registrant outstanding
as of February 21, 2008 was 45,865,941 shares.
Documents Incorporated By Reference Herein:
Registrants Definitive Proxy Statement for its Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed within
120 days of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007,
is incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
Forward-Looking Statements
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
PART I
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Item 1A.
|
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
Item 1B.
|
|
|
Unresolved Staff Comments
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
|
|
Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
|
|
Selected Financial Data
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
Item 7.
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
Item 7A.
|
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Item 8.
|
|
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Item 9.
|
|
|
Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Item 9A.
|
|
|
Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Item 9B.
|
|
|
Other Information
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
|
|
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Item 11.
|
|
|
Executive Compensation
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Item 12.
|
|
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
and Related Stockholder Matters
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Item 13.
|
|
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Item 14.
|
|
|
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
|
|
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity
and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
54
|
|
Signatures
|
|
|
87
|
|
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
88
|
|
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
Some of the statements under Item 1.
Business, Item 7. Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and elsewhere in this
Form 10-K
constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking
statements by terminology such as may,
will, should, could,
expects, plans, intends,
anticipates, believes,
estimates, predicts,
potential, or continue, or the negative
of such terms and other comparable terminology. Although we
believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking
statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results,
levels of activity, performance or achievements. These
statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of
activity, performance or achievements to differ from those
expressed or implied by the forward-looking statement because of:
|
|
|
changes in our borrowers performance on loans;
|
|
|
changes in the commercial and consumer real estate markets;
|
|
|
changes in our costs of operation, compliance and expansion;
|
|
|
changes in the economy, including inflation;
|
|
|
changes in government interest rate policies;
|
|
|
changes in laws or the regulatory environment;
|
|
|
changes in the equity and debt securities markets; and
|
|
|
acts of terrorism or natural disasters such as earthquakes or
floods.
|
For a discussion of these factors as well as some of the other
factors that might cause such differences, see
Item 1A. Risk Factors, Item 7.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations Interest Rate Risk
Management and Liquidity and
Capital Resources. We undertake no obligation to
update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or
circumstances that occur after the date on which such statements
were made, except as required by law.
PART I
General
Hanmi Financial Corporation (Hanmi Financial,
we or us) is a Delaware corporation
incorporated on March 14, 2000 pursuant to a Plan of
Reorganization and Agreement of Merger to be the holding company
for Hanmi Bank (the Bank). Hanmi Financial became
the holding company for the Bank in June 2000 and is subject to
the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended
(BHCA). Hanmi Financial also elected financial
holding company status under the BHCA in 2000. Our principal
office is located at 3660 Wilshire Boulevard, Penthouse
Suite A, Los Angeles, California 90010, and our telephone
number is
(213) 382-2200.
Hanmi Bank, our primary subsidiary, is a state chartered bank
incorporated under the laws of the State of California on
August 24, 1981, and licensed by the California Department
of Financial Institutions (DFI) on December 15,
1982. The Banks deposit accounts are insured under the
Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDI Act) up to
applicable limits thereof, and the Bank is a member of the
Federal Reserve System. The Banks headquarters is located
at 3660 Wilshire Boulevard, Penthouse Suite A, Los Angeles,
California 90010.
The Bank is a community bank conducting general business
banking, with its primary market encompassing the
Korean-American
community as well as other communities in the multi-ethnic
populations of Los Angeles County, Orange County,
San Bernardino County, San Diego County, the
San Francisco Bay area, and the Silicon Valley area in
Santa Clara County. The Banks full-service offices
are located in business areas where many of the businesses are
run by immigrants and other minority groups. The Banks
client base reflects the multi-ethnic composition of these
communities. At December 31, 2007, the Bank maintained a
branch network of 24 full-service branch offices in California
and eight loan production offices in California, Colorado,
Georgia, Illinois, Texas, Virginia and Washington.
Our other subsidiaries are Chun-Ha Insurance Services, Inc.
(Chun-Ha) and All World Insurance Services, Inc.
(All World), which were acquired in January 2007.
Founded in 1989, Chun-Ha and All World are insurance brokerages
that offer a complete line of insurance products, including
life, commercial, automobile, health, and property and casualty.
1
The Banks revenues are derived primarily from interest on
our loan and securities portfolios and service charges on
deposit accounts. A summary of revenues for the periods
indicated follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Interest and Fees on Loans
|
|
$
|
261,992
|
|
|
|
81.6%
|
|
|
|
$
|
239,075
|
|
|
|
80.5%
|
|
|
$
|
180,845
|
|
|
|
77.8%
|
|
Interest on Investments
|
|
|
17,867
|
|
|
|
5.6%
|
|
|
|
|
19,710
|
|
|
|
6.6%
|
|
|
|
18,507
|
|
|
|
8.0%
|
|
Other Interest Income
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
|
|
0.3%
|
|
|
|
|
1,404
|
|
|
|
0.5%
|
|
|
|
1,589
|
|
|
|
0.7%
|
|
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts
|
|
|
18,061
|
|
|
|
5.6%
|
|
|
|
|
17,134
|
|
|
|
5.8%
|
|
|
|
15,782
|
|
|
|
6.8%
|
|
Other Non-Interest Income
|
|
|
21,945
|
|
|
|
6.9%
|
|
|
|
|
19,829
|
|
|
|
6.6%
|
|
|
|
15,668
|
|
|
|
6.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
$
|
320,902
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
$
|
297,152
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
$
|
232,391
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
Market Area
The Bank historically has provided its banking services through
its branch network, located primarily in the Koreatown area of
Los Angeles, to a wide variety of small- to medium-sized
businesses. In recent years, it has expanded its service areas
through de novo branching to Orange County, San Bernardino
County, the Silicon Valley area in Santa Clara County, and
San Diego County, and through acquisition to the
San Francisco Bay area and the Seattle, Washington
metropolitan area.
Throughout the Banks service areas, competition is intense
for both loans and deposits. While the market for banking
services is dominated by a few nationwide banks with many
offices operating over a wide geographic area, savings banks,
thrift and loan associations, credit unions, mortgage companies,
insurance companies and other lending institutions, the
Banks primary competitors are relatively smaller community
banks that focus their marketing efforts on
Korean-American
businesses in the Banks service areas. Substantially all
of our assets are located in, and substantially all of our
revenues are derived from clients located within, the State of
California.
In 2007, the Bank opened two full-service branch offices in
Fullerton, California and Rancho Cucamonga, California. In 2005
and 2006, the Bank opened loan production offices in Atlanta,
Chicago, Dallas, Denver and Annandale. These offices will expand
our geographic coverage by providing commercial and industrial,
real estate and Small Business Administration (SBA)
loans. The Bank also has loan production offices in Los Angeles,
California; the San Jose, California metropolitan area; and
the Seattle, Washington metropolitan area. We plan to continue
to expand our business services by opening additional loan
production offices in selected locations throughout the United
States. The Bank is a preferred SBA lender in the following SBA
districts: California (Los Angeles, Santa Ana, San Diego,
Fresno, San Francisco and Sacramento), Portland, Seattle,
Anchorage, Denver, Texas (Dallas and Houston), Illinois,
Georgia, Florida, Virginia, Washington, D.C., Maryland, New
Jersey and New York.
Lending
Activities
The Bank originates loans for its own portfolio and for sale in
the secondary market. Lending activities include real estate
loans (commercial property, construction and residential
property), commercial and industrial loans (commercial term
loans, commercial lines of credit, SBA loans and international
trade finance), and consumer loans.
Real
Estate Loans
Real estate lending involves risks associated with the potential
decline in the value of the underlying real estate collateral
and the cash flow from income-producing properties. Declines in
real estate values and cash flows can be caused by a number of
factors, including adversity in general economic conditions,
rising interest rates, changes in tax and other laws and
regulations affecting the holding of real estate, environmental
conditions, governmental and other use restrictions, development
of competitive properties and increasing vacancy rates. When
real estate values decline, the Banks real estate
dependence increases the risk of loss both in the Banks
loan portfolio and any holdings of other real estate owned
because of foreclosures on loans.
Commercial
Property
The Bank offers commercial real estate loans. These loans are
generally collateralized by first deeds of trust. For these
commercial mortgage loans, the Bank obtains formal appraisals in
accordance with applicable regulations to support the value of
the real estate collateral. All appraisal reports on commercial
mortgage loans are reviewed by an appraisal review officer. The
review generally covers an examination of the appraisers
assumptions and methods that were used to derive a value for the
property, as well as compliance with the Uniform Standards of
Professional
2
Appraisal Practice (the USPAP). The Bank first looks
to cash flow from the borrower to repay the loan and then to
cash flow from the business. The majority of the properties
securing these loans are located in Los Angeles County and
Orange County.
The Banks commercial real estate loans are principally
secured by investor-owned commercial buildings and
owner-occupied commercial and industrial buildings. Generally,
these types of loans are made for a period of up to seven years.
Monthly payments are based upon a portion of the principal plus
accrued interest. These loans usually have a loan-to-value ratio
of 65 percent or less, using an adjustable rate indexed to
the prime rate appearing in the West Coast edition of The
Wall Street Journal (WSJ Prime Rate) or the
Banks prime rate (Bank Prime Rate), as
adjusted from time to time. The Bank also offers fixed-rate
commercial real estate loans, including hybrid-fixed rate loans
that are fixed for one to five years and convert to adjustable
rate loans for the remaining term. Amortization schedules for
commercial real estate loans generally do not exceed
25 years.
Payments on loans secured by investor-owned and owner-occupied
properties are often dependent upon successful operation or
management of the properties. Repayment of such loans may be
subject to a greater extent to the risk of adverse conditions in
the real estate market or the economy. The Bank seeks to
minimize these risks in a variety of ways, including limiting
the size of such loans in relation to the market value of the
property and strictly scrutinizing the property securing the
loan. The Bank manages these risks in a variety of ways,
including vacancy and interest rate hike sensitivity analysis at
the time of loan origination and quarterly risk assessment of
the total commercial real estate secured loan portfolio that
includes most recent industry trends. When possible, the Bank
also obtains corporate or individual guarantees from financially
capable parties. Representatives of the Bank visit all of the
properties securing the Banks real estate loans before the
loans are approved. The Bank requires title insurance insuring
the status of its lien on all of the real estate secured loans
when a trust deed on the real estate is taken as collateral. The
Bank also requires the borrower to maintain fire insurance,
extended coverage casualty insurance and, if the property is in
a flood zone, flood insurance, in an amount equal to the
outstanding loan balance, subject to applicable laws that may
limit the amount of hazard insurance a lender can require to
replace such improvements. We cannot assure that these
procedures will protect against losses on loans secured by real
property.
Construction
The Bank finances the construction of multifamily, low-income
housing, commercial and industrial properties within its market
area. The future condition of the local economy could negatively
affect the collateral values of such loans. The Banks
construction loans typically have the following characteristics:
|
|
|
maturities of two years or less;
|
|
|
a floating rate of interest based on the Bank Prime Rate or the
WSJ Prime Rate;
|
|
|
minimum cash equity of 35 percent of project cost;
|
|
|
reserve of anticipated interest costs during construction or
advance of fees;
|
|
|
first lien position on the underlying real estate;
|
|
|
loan-to-value ratios generally not exceeding
65 percent; and
|
|
|
recourse against the borrower or a guarantor in the event of
default.
|
The Bank does, on a
case-by-case
basis, commit to making permanent loans on the property with
loan conditions that command strong project stability and debt
service coverage. Construction loans involve additional risks
compared to loans secured by existing improved real property.
These include the following:
|
|
|
the uncertain value of the project prior to completion;
|
|
|
the inherent uncertainty in estimating construction costs, which
are often beyond the borrowers control;
|
|
|
construction delays and cost overruns;
|
|
|
possible difficulties encountered in connection with municipal
or other governmental regulations during construction; and
|
|
|
the difficulty in accurately evaluating the market value of the
completed project.
|
Because of these uncertainties, construction lending often
involves the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment
dependent, in part, on the success of the ultimate project
rather than the ability of the borrower or guarantor to repay
principal and interest. If the Bank is forced to foreclose on a
project prior to or at completion due to a default, there can be
no assurance that the Bank will be able to recover all of the
unpaid balance of, or accrued interest on, the loans as well as
the related foreclosure and holding costs. In addition, the Bank
may be required to fund additional amounts to complete a project
and may have to hold the property for an indeterminable period.
The Bank has underwriting procedures designed to identify what
it believes to be acceptable levels of risk in construction
lending. Among other things, qualified and bonded third parties
are engaged to provide progress reports and recommendations for
construction disbursements. No assurance can
3
be given that these procedures will prevent losses arising from
the risks described above.
Residential
Property
The Bank originates fixed-rate and variable-rate mortgage loans
secured by one- to four-family properties with amortization
schedules of 15 to 30 years and maturities of up to
30 years. The loan fees charged, interest rates and other
provisions of the Banks residential loans are determined
by an analysis of the Banks cost of funds, cost of
origination, cost of servicing, risk factors and portfolio
needs. The Bank may sell some of the mortgage loans that it
originates to secondary market participants. The typical
turn-around time from origination to sale is between 30 and
90 days. The interest rate and the price of the loan are
typically agreed to prior to the loan origination.
Commercial
and Industrial Loans
The Bank offers commercial loans for intermediate and short-term
credit. Commercial loans may be unsecured, partially secured or
fully secured. The majority of the origination of commercial
loans is in Los Angeles County and Orange County, and loan
maturities are normally 12 to 60 months. The Bank requires
a credit underwriting before considering any extension of
credit. The Bank finances primarily small and middle market
businesses in a wide spectrum of industries. Commercial and
industrial loans consist of credit lines for operating needs,
loans for equipment purchases and working capital, and various
other business purposes. As compared to consumer lending,
commercial lending entails significant additional risks. These
loans typically involve larger loan balances, are generally
dependent on the cash flow of the business and may be subject to
adverse conditions in the general economy or in a specific
industry. Short-term business loans generally are intended to
finance current operations and typically provide for periodic
principal payments, with interest payable monthly. Term loans
normally provide for floating interest rates, with monthly
payments of both principal and interest.
In general, it is the intent of the Bank to take collateral
whenever possible, regardless of the loan purpose(s). Collateral
may include liens on inventory, accounts receivable, fixtures
and equipment, leasehold improvements and real estate. When real
estate is the primary collateral, the Bank obtains formal
appraisals in accordance with applicable regulations to support
the value of the real estate collateral. Typically, the Bank
requires all principals of a business to be co-obligors on all
loan instruments and all significant stockholders of
corporations to execute a specific debt guaranty. All borrowers
must demonstrate the ability to service and repay not only their
obligations to the Bank debt, but also all outstanding business
debt, without liquidating the collateral, based on historical
earnings or reliable projections.
Commercial Term
Loans
The Bank finances small and middle-market businesses in a wide
spectrum of industries throughout California. The Bank offers
term loans for a variety of needs, including loans for working
capital, purchases of equipment, machinery or inventory,
business acquisitions, renovation of facilities, and refinancing
of existing business-related debts. These loans have repayment
terms of up to seven years.
Commercial Lines
of Credit
The Bank offers lines of credit for a variety of short-term
needs, including lines of credit for working capital, account
receivable and inventory financing, and other purposes related
to business operations. Commercial lines of credit usually have
a term of 12 months or less.
SBA
Loans
The Bank originates loans qualifying for guarantees issued by
the United States SBA, an independent agency of the Federal
government. The SBA guarantees on such loans currently range
from 75 percent to 85 percent of the principal and
accrued interest. Under certain circumstances, the guarantee of
principal and interest may be less than 75 percent. In
general, the guaranteed percentage is less than 75 percent
for loans over $1.3 million. The Bank typically requires
that SBA loans be secured by business assets and by a first or
second deed of trust on any available real property. When the
loan is secured by a first deed of trust on real property, the
Bank obtains appraisals in accordance with applicable
regulations. SBA loans have terms ranging from five to twenty
years depending on the use of the proceeds. To qualify for a SBA
loan, a borrower must demonstrate the capacity to service and
repay the loan, without liquidating the collateral, based on
historical earnings or reliable projections.
The Bank generally sells to unrelated third parties a
substantial amount of the guaranteed portion of the SBA
guaranteed loans that it originates. During the fourth quarter
of 2007 and 2006, the Bank also sold the unguaranteed portion of
some SBA loans. When the Bank sells a SBA loan, it has a right
to repurchase the loan if the loan defaults. If the Bank
repurchases a loan, the Bank will make a demand for guarantee
purchase to the SBA. The Bank retains the right to service the
SBA loans, for which it receives servicing fees. The unsold
portions of the SBA loans that remain owned by the Bank are
included in loans receivable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
As of December 31, 2007, the
4
Bank had $118.5 million of SBA loans in its portfolio, and
was servicing $258.5 million of SBA loans sold to investors.
International
Trade Finance
The Bank offers a variety of international finance and trade
services and products, including letters of credit, import
financing (trust receipt financing and bankers
acceptances) and export financing. Although most of our trade
finance activities are related to trade with Asian countries,
all of our loans are made to companies domiciled in the United
States. A substantial portion of this business involves
California-based customers engaged in import activities.
Consumer
Loans
Consumer loans are extended for a variety of purposes, including
automobile loans, secured and unsecured personal loans, home
improvement loans, home equity lines of credit
(HELOCs), overdraft protection loans, unsecured
lines of credit and credit cards. Management assesses the
borrowers creditworthiness and ability to repay the debt
through a review of credit history and ratings, verification of
employment and other income, review of debt-to-income ratios and
other measures of repayment ability. Although creditworthiness
of the applicant is of primary importance, the underwriting
process also includes a comparison of the value of the
collateral, if any, to the proposed loan amount. Most of the
Banks loans to individuals are repayable on an installment
basis.
Any repossessed collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not
provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan
balance, because the collateral is more likely to suffer damage,
loss or depreciation. The remaining deficiency often does not
warrant further collection efforts against the borrower beyond
obtaining a deficiency judgment. In addition, the collection of
loans to individuals is dependent on the borrowers
continuing financial stability, and thus is more likely to be
adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal
bankruptcy. Furthermore, various Federal and state laws,
including bankruptcy and insolvency laws, often limit the amount
that the lender can recover on loans to individuals. Loans to
individuals may also give rise to claims and defenses by a
consumer borrower against the lender on these loans, and a
borrower may be able to assert against any assignee of the note
these claims and defenses that the borrower has against the
seller of the underlying collateral.
Off-Balance
Sheet Commitments
As part of its service to its small- to medium-sized business
customers, the Bank from time to time issues formal commitments
and lines of credit. These commitments can be either secured or
unsecured. They may be in the form of revolving lines of credit
for seasonal working capital needs or may take the form of
commercial letters of credit or standby letters of credit.
Commercial letters of credit facilitate import trade. Standby
letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank
to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party.
Lending
Procedures and Loan Limits
Loan applications may be approved by the Board of
Directors Loan Committee, or by the Banks management
or lending officers to the extent of their lending authority.
Individual lending authority is granted to the Chief Credit
Officer, the Deputy Chief Credit Officer, Senior Credit Officers
and certain additional officers, including Branch Managers and
the line managers to whom they report. Loans for which direct
and indirect borrower liability exceeds an individuals
lending authority are referred to the Banks Management
Credit Committee and, for those in excess of the Management
Credit Committees approval limits, to the Board of
Directors Loan Committee.
Legal lending limits are calculated in conformance with the
California Financial Code, which prohibits a bank from lending
to any one individual or entity or its related interests on an
unsecured basis any amount that exceeds 15 percent of the
sum of shareholders equity plus the allowance for loan
losses, capital notes and any debentures, plus an additional
10 percent on a secured basis. At December 31, 2007,
the Banks authorized legal lending limits for loans to one
borrower were $56.6 million for unsecured loans plus an
additional $37.8 million for specific secured loans.
However, the Bank has established internal loan limits that are
lower than the legal lending limits.
The Bank seeks to mitigate the risks inherent in its loan
portfolio by adhering to certain underwriting practices. The
review of each loan application includes analysis of the
applicants experience, prior credit history, income level,
cash flow, financial condition, tax returns, cash flow
projections, and the value of any collateral to secure the loan,
based upon reports of independent appraisers
and/or
audits of accounts receivable or inventory pledged as security.
In the case of real estate loans over a specified amount, the
review of collateral value includes an appraisal report prepared
by an independent Bank-approved appraiser. All appraisal reports
on commercial real property secured loans are reviewed by an
Appraisal Review Officer. The review generally covers an
examination of the appraisers assumptions and methods that
were used to derive a value for the property, as well as
compliance with the USPAP.
5
Allowance
for Loan Losses, Allowance for Off-Balance Sheet Items and
Provision for Credit Losses
The Bank maintains an allowance for loan losses at a level
considered by management to be adequate to cover the inherent
risks of loss associated with its loan portfolio under
prevailing economic conditions. In addition, the Bank maintains
an allowance for off-balance sheet items associated with
unfunded commitments and letters of credit, which is included in
other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The Bank follows the Interagency Policy Statement on
the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and analyzes
the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis. In addition,
as an integral part of the quarterly credit review process of
the Bank, the allowance for loan losses and allowance for
off-balance sheet items are reviewed for adequacy. The DFI
and/or the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the
FRB) may require the Bank to recognize additions to
the allowance for loan losses based upon their assessment of the
information available to them at the time of their examinations.
Deposits
The Bank raises funds primarily through its network of branches.
The Bank attracts deposits by offering a wide variety of
transaction and term accounts and personalized customer service.
Accounts offered include business and personal checking
accounts, savings accounts, negotiable order of withdrawal
(NOW) accounts, money market accounts and
certificates of deposit.
Website
We maintain an Internet website at www.hanmi.com. We make
available free of charge on the website our Annual Reports on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
and any amendments thereto, as soon as reasonably practicable
after we file such reports with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC or the Commission). None
of the information on or hyperlinked from our website is
incorporated into this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Employees
As of December 31, 2007, the Bank had 612 full-time
employees and 15 part-time employees and Chun-Ha and All
World had 31 full-time employees and 1 part-time
employee. Our employees are not represented by a union or
covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We believe that
our employee relations are satisfactory.
Insurance
We maintain financial institution bond and commercial insurance
at levels deemed adequate by management to protect Hanmi
Financial from certain litigation and other losses.
Competition
The banking and financial services industry in California
generally, and in the Banks market areas specifically, are
highly competitive. The increasingly competitive environment
faced by banks is a result primarily of changes in laws and
regulation, changes in technology and product delivery systems,
new competitors in the market, and the accelerating pace of
consolidation among financial service providers. We compete for
loans, deposits and customers with other commercial banks,
savings institutions, securities and brokerage companies,
mortgage companies, real estate investment trusts, insurance
companies, finance companies, money market funds, credit unions
and other non-bank financial service providers. Some of these
competitors are larger in total assets and capitalization, have
greater access to capital markets, including foreign-ownership,
and/or offer
a broader range of financial services.
Among the advantages that the major banks have over the Bank is
their ability to finance extensive advertising campaigns and to
allocate their investment assets to regions of highest yield and
demand. Many of the major commercial banks operating in the
Banks service areas offer specific services (for instance,
trust services) that are not offered directly by the Bank. By
virtue of their greater total capitalization, these banks also
have substantially higher lending limits than the Bank does.
The recent trend has been for other institutions, including
brokerage firms, credit card companies and retail
establishments, to offer banking services to consumers,
including money market funds with check access and cash advances
on credit card accounts. In addition, other entities (both
public and private) seeking to raise capital through the
issuance and sale of debt or equity securities compete with
banks in the acquisition of deposits.
The Banks major competitors are relatively smaller
community banks that focus their marketing efforts on
Korean-American
businesses in the Banks service areas. Amongst these
banks, the Bank is the largest, with a loan portfolio that is
41.8 percent larger than its nearest competitors loan
portfolio, and a deposit portfolio that is 60.6 percent
larger than its nearest competitors deposit portfolio.
These banks compete for loans primarily through the interest
rates and fees they charge and the convenience and quality of
service they provide to borrowers. The principal bases of
competition for deposits are the interest rate paid, convenience
and service.
6
In order to compete with other financial institutions in its
service area, the Bank relies principally upon local promotional
activity, including advertising in the local media, personal
contacts, direct mail and specialized services. The Banks
promotional activities emphasize the advantages of dealing with
a locally owned and headquartered institution attuned to the
particular needs of the community.
Economic
Conditions, Government Policies, Legislation and Regulation
Our profitability, like that of most financial institutions, is
primarily dependent on interest rate differentials. In general,
the difference between the interest rates paid by us on
interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and other
borrowings, and the interest rates received by us on our
interest-earning assets, such as loans extended to our customers
and securities held in our investment portfolio, will comprise
the major portion of our earnings. These rates are highly
sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control, such as
inflation, recession and unemployment, and the impact that
future changes in domestic and foreign economic conditions might
have on us cannot be predicted.
Our business is also influenced by the monetary and fiscal
policies of the Federal government and the policies of
regulatory agencies, particularly the FRB. The FRB implements
national monetary policies (with objectives such as curbing
inflation and combating recession) through its open-market
operations in U.S. Government securities, by adjusting the
required level of reserves for depository institutions subject
to its reserve requirements, and by varying the target Federal
funds and discount rates applicable to borrowings by depository
institutions. The actions of the FRB in these areas influence
the growth of bank loans, investments and deposits and affect
interest earned on interest-earning assets and interest paid on
interest-bearing liabilities. The nature and impact on us of any
future changes in monetary and fiscal policies cannot be
predicted.
From time to time, Federal and state legislation is enacted
which may have the effect of materially increasing the cost of
doing business, limiting or expanding permissible activities, or
affecting the competitive balance between banks and other
financial services providers, such as recent Federal legislation
permitting affiliations among commercial banks, insurance
companies and securities firms. We cannot predict whether or
when any potential legislation will be enacted, and if enacted,
the effect that it, or any implementing regulations, would have
on our financial condition or results of operations. In
addition, the outcome of any investigations initiated by state
authorities or litigation raising issues may result in necessary
changes in our operations, additional regulation and increased
compliance costs.
Supervision
and Regulation
General
We are extensively regulated under both Federal and certain
state laws. Regulation and supervision by the Federal and state
banking agencies is intended primarily for the protection of
depositors and the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF)
administered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(FDIC), and not for the benefit of stockholders. Set
forth below is a summary description of the key laws and
regulations that relate to our operations. These descriptions
are qualified in their entirety by reference to the applicable
laws and regulations.
Hanmi
Financial
As a bank and financial holding company, we are subject to
regulation and examination by the FRB under the BHCA.
Accordingly, we are subject to the FRBs authority to:
|
|
|
require periodic reports and such additional information as the
FRB may require.
|
|
|
require us to maintain certain levels of capital. See
Capital Standards.
|
|
|
require that bank holding companies serve as a source of
financial and managerial strength to subsidiary banks and commit
resources as necessary to support each subsidiary bank. A bank
holding companys failure to meet its obligations to serve
as a source of strength to its subsidiary banks will generally
be considered by the FRB to be an unsafe and unsound banking
practice or a violation of FRB regulations or both.
|
|
|
terminate an activity or terminate control of or liquidate or
divest certain subsidiaries, affiliates or investments if the
FRB believes the activity or the control of the subsidiary or
affiliate constitutes a significant risk to the financial
safety, soundness or stability of any bank subsidiary.
|
|
|
regulate provisions of certain bank holding company debt,
including the authority to impose interest ceilings and reserve
requirements on such debt and require prior approval to purchase
or redeem our securities in certain situations.
|
|
|
approve acquisitions and mergers with other banks or savings
institutions and consider certain competitive, management,
financial and other factors in granting these approvals. Similar
California and other state banking agency approvals may also be
required.
|
7
Non-Banking
and Financial Activities
Subject to certain prior notice or FRB approval requirements,
bank holding companies may engage in any, or acquire shares of
companies engaged in, those non-banking activities determined by
the FRB to be so closely related to banking or managing or
controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. Hanmi
Financial may engage in these non-banking activities and broader
securities, insurance, merchant banking and other activities
that are determined to be financial in nature or are
incidental or complementary to activities that are financial in
nature without prior FRB approval pursuant to its election to
become a financial holding company. Pursuant to the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (the GLBA), in order
to elect and retain financial holding company status, all
depository institution subsidiaries of a bank holding company
must be well capitalized, well managed, and, except in limited
circumstances, be in satisfactory compliance with the Community
Reinvestment Act (CRA). Failure to sustain
compliance with these requirements or correct any non-compliance
within a fixed time period could lead to divestiture of
subsidiary banks or require all activities to conform to those
permissible for a bank holding company. Chun-Ha and All World
qualify as financial subsidiaries under the GLBA.
Hanmi Financial is also a bank holding company within the
meaning of the California Financial Code. As such, Hanmi
Financial and its subsidiaries are subject to examination by,
and may be required to file reports with, the DFI.
Securities
Registration
Our securities are registered with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) under the Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act). As such, we are subject
to the information, proxy solicitation, insider trading,
corporate governance, and other requirements and restrictions of
the Exchange Act.
The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
We are subject to the accounting oversight and corporate
governance requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
including:
|
|
|
required executive certification of financial presentations;
|
|
|
increased requirements for board audit committees and their
members;
|
|
|
enhanced disclosure of controls and procedures and internal
control over financial reporting;
|
|
|
enhanced controls on, and reporting of, insider trading; and
|
|
|
increased penalties for financial crimes and forfeiture of
executive bonuses in certain circumstances.
|
The
Bank
As a California chartered bank, the Bank is subject to primary
supervision, periodic examination, and regulation by the DFI and
by the FRB as the Banks primary federal regulator. As a
member bank, the Bank is a stockholder of the Federal Reserve
Bank of San Francisco (the Reserve Bank). If,
as a result of an examination, the DFI or the FRB should
determine that the financial condition, capital resources, asset
quality, earnings prospects, management, liquidity, or other
aspects of the Banks operations are unsatisfactory or that
the Bank or its management is violating or has violated any law
or regulation, the DFI and the FRB, and separately the FDIC as
insurer of the Banks deposits, have residual authority to:
|
|
|
require affirmative action to correct any conditions resulting
from any violation or practice;
|
|
|
direct an increase in capital;
|
|
|
restrict the Banks growth geographically, by products and
services or by mergers and acquisitions;
|
|
|
enter into informal nonpublic or formal public memoranda of
understanding or written agreements; enjoin unsafe and unsound
practices and issue cease and desist orders to take corrective
action;
|
|
|
remove officers and directors and assess civil monetary
penalties; and
|
|
|
take possession and close and liquidate the Bank.
|
Permissible
Activities and Subsidiaries
California law permits state chartered commercial banks to
engage in any activity permissible for national banks.
Therefore, the Bank may form subsidiaries to engage in the many
so-called closely related to banking or
non-banking activities commonly conducted by
national banks in operating subsidiaries, and, further, pursuant
to the GLBA, the Bank may conduct certain financial
activities in a subsidiary to the same extent as may a national
bank, provided the Bank is and remains
well-capitalized, well-managed and in
satisfactory compliance with the CRA. Presently, none of the
Banks subsidiaries are financial subsidiaries.
In September, 2007, the SEC and the FRB finalized joint rules
required by the Financial Services Regulatory Relief Act of 2006
to implement exceptions provided in the GLBA for securities
activities that banks may conduct without registering with the
SEC as a securities broker or moving such activities to a
broker-dealer
8
affiliate. The FRBs final Regulation R provides
exceptions for networking arrangements with third party
broker-dealers and authorizes compensation for bank employees
who refer and assist retail and high net worth bank customers
with their securities, including sweep accounts to money market
funds, and with related trust, fiduciary, custodial and
safekeeping needs. The final rules, which will not be effective
until 2009, are not expected to have a material effect on the
current securities activities that the Bank currently conducts
for customers.
Interstate
Banking and Branching
Under the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branch Efficiency
Act of 1994, bank holding companies and banks generally have the
ability to acquire or merge with banks in other states; and,
subject to certain state restrictions, banks may also acquire or
establish new branches outside their home states. Interstate
branches are subject to certain laws of the states in which they
are located. The Bank presently has no interstate branches.
Federal
Home Loan Bank System
The Bank is a member and stockholder of the capital stock of the
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco. Among other
benefits, each Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) serves
as a reserve or central bank for its members within its assigned
region and makes available loans or advances to its members.
Each FHLB is financed primarily from the sale of consolidated
obligations of the FHLB system.
Federal
Reserve System
The FRB requires all depository institutions to maintain
noninterest-bearing reserves at specified levels against their
transaction accounts (primarily checking and non-personal time
deposits). At December 31, 2007, the Bank was in compliance
with these requirements.
Dividends
and Other Transfers of Funds
Dividends from the Bank constitute the principal source of
income to Hanmi Financial. The Bank is subject to various
statutory and regulatory restrictions on its ability to pay
dividends without the prior approval of the DFI or the FRB. In
addition, the banking agencies have the authority to prohibit
the Bank from paying dividends, depending upon the Banks
financial condition, if such payment is deemed to constitute an
unsafe or unsound practice. Furthermore, under the Federal
Prompt Corrective Action regulations, the FRB may prohibit a
bank holding company from paying any dividends if the holding
companys bank subsidiary is classified as
undercapitalized. See Item 5. Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Dividends for a further discussion of restrictions on
the Banks ability to pay dividends to Hanmi Financial.
Capital
Standards
At December 31, 2007, Hanmi Financial and the Banks
capital ratios exceed the minimum percentage requirements for
well capitalized institutions. See Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 14
Regulatory Matters.
The Federal banking agencies have adopted risk-based minimum
capital guidelines for bank holding companies and banks that are
intended to provide a measure of capital that reflects the
degree of risk associated with a banking organizations
operations for both transactions reported on the balance sheet
as assets and transactions that are recorded as off-balance
sheet items. The risk-based capital ratio is determined by
classifying assets and certain off-balance sheet financial
instruments into weighted categories, with higher levels of
capital being required for those categories perceived as
representing greater risk. Under the capital guidelines, a
banking organizations total capital is divided into tiers.
Tier 1 capital includes common equity and
trust-preferred securities, subject to certain criteria and
quantitative limits. The risk-based capital guidelines require a
minimum ratio of qualifying total capital to risk-weighted
assets of 8.0 percent and a minimum ratio of Tier 1
capital to risk-weighted assets of 4.0 percent.
An institutions risk-based capital, leverage capital and
tangible capital ratios together determine the
institutions capital classification. An institution is
treated as well capitalized if its total capital to
risk-weighted assets ratio is 10.0 percent or more; its
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio is
6.0 percent or more; and its Tier 1 capital to
adjusted total average assets ratio is 5.0 percent or more.
As of December 31, 2007, the regulatory capital guidelines
and the actual capital ratios for Hanmi Financial and the Bank
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual as
of
|
|
|
Requirement
|
|
December 31,
2007
|
|
|
|
Adequately
|
|
Well
|
|
Hanmi
|
|
Hanmi
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
Bank
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
10.59
|
%
|
|
|
10.65
|
%
|
Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital Ratio
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
9.34
|
%
|
|
|
9.40
|
%
|
Tier 1 Leverage Capital Ratio
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
8.47
|
%
|
|
|
8.52
|
%
|
|
|
The current risk-based capital guidelines are based upon the
1988 capital accord of the International Basel Committee on
Banking
9
Supervision. A new international accord, referred to as Basel
II, which emphasizes internal assessment of credit, market and
operational risk, supervisory assessment and market discipline
in determining minimum capital requirements, currently becomes
mandatory for large international banks outside the U.S. in
2008, is optional for others, and must be complied with in a
parallel run for two years along with the existing
Basel I standards. A separate rule is expected to be released
and issued in final by the Federal regulatory agencies in 2008,
which will offer U.S. banks that will not adopt
Basel II an alternative standardized approach under
Basel II option and address concerns that the
Basel II framework may offer significant competitive
advantages for the largest U.S. and international banks.
The U.S. banking agencies have indicated, however, that
they will retain the minimum leverage requirement for all
U.S. banks. Further proposals and revisions to the
Basel II framework may also occur in response to recent
adverse liquidity and securitization market developments.
The FDI Act gives the Federal banking agencies the additional
broad authority to take prompt corrective action to
resolve the problems of insured depository institutions that
fall within any undercapitalized category, including requiring
the submission of an acceptable capital restoration plan. The
Federal banking agencies have also adopted non-capital safety
and soundness standards to assist examiners in identifying and
addressing potential safety and soundness concerns before
capital becomes impaired. The guidelines set forth operational
and managerial standards relating to: (i) internal
controls, information systems and internal audit systems,
(ii) loan documentation, (iii) credit underwriting,
(iv) asset quality and growth, (v) earnings,
(vi) risk management, and (vii) compensation and
benefits.
FDIC
Insurance
Through the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF), the FDIC
insures the Banks customer deposits up to prescribed
limits for each depositor. The amount of FDIC assessments paid
by each DIF member institution is based on its relative risk of
default as measured by regulatory capital ratios and other
supervisory factors. The FDIC may increase or decrease the
assessment rate schedule on a semi-annual basis. The Federal
Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2006 (FDIRA) and
implementing regulations provide for changes in the formula and
factors to be considered by the FDIC in calculating the FDIC
reserve ratio, assessments and dividends, including business
line concentrations and risk of failure and severity of loss in
the event of failure. It is unclear whether the FDIC may need to
increase assessments in the near term or longer term to address
the risks and costs of any increase in bank failures.
The FDIC may terminate a depository institutions deposit
insurance upon a finding that the institutions financial
condition is unsafe or unsound or that the institution has
engaged in unsafe or unsound practices that pose a risk to the
DIF or that may prejudice the interest of a banks
depositors. The termination of deposit insurance for the Bank
would also result in the revocation of the Banks charter
by the DFI.
Extensions
of Credit to Insiders and Transactions with Affiliates
The Federal Reserve Act and FRB Regulation O place
limitations and conditions on loans or extensions of credit to:
|
|
|
a bank or bank holding companys executive officers,
directors and principal shareholders (i.e., in most cases, those
persons who own, control or have power to vote more than
10 percent of any class of voting securities);
|
|
|
any company controlled by any such executive officer, director
or shareholder; or
|
|
|
any political or campaign committee controlled by such executive
officer, director or principal shareholder.
|
Such loans and leases:
|
|
|
must comply with loan-to-one-borrower limits;
|
|
|
require prior full board approval when aggregate extensions of
credit to the person exceed specified amounts;
|
|
|
must be made on substantially the same terms (including interest
rates and collateral) and follow credit-underwriting procedures
no less stringent than those prevailing at the time for
comparable transactions with non-insiders;
|
|
|
must not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or
present other unfavorable features; and
|
|
|
in the aggregate limit not exceed the banks unimpaired
capital and unimpaired surplus.
|
California has laws and the DFI has regulations that adopt and
apply Regulation O to the Bank.
The Bank also is subject to certain restrictions imposed by
Federal Reserve Act Sections 23A and 23B and FRB
Regulation W on any extensions of credit to, or the
issuance of a guarantee or letter of credit on behalf of, any
affiliates, the purchase of, or investments in, stock or other
securities thereof, the taking of such securities as collateral
for loans, and the purchase of assets of any affiliates.
Affiliates include parent holding companies, sister banks,
sponsored and advised companies, financial subsidiaries and
investment
10
companies where the Banks affiliate serves as investment
advisor. Sections 23A and 23B and Regulation W
generally:
|
|
|
prevent any affiliates from borrowing from the Bank unless the
loans are secured by marketable obligations of designated
amounts;
|
|
|
limit such loans and investments to or in any affiliate
individually to 10 percent of the Banks capital and
surplus;
|
|
|
limit such loans and investments to all affiliate in the
aggregate to 20 percent of the Banks capital and
surplus; and
|
|
|
require such loans and investments to or in any affiliate to be
on terms and under conditions substantially the same or at least
as favorable to the Bank as those prevailing for comparable
transactions with nonaffiliated parties.
|
Additional restrictions on transactions with affiliates may be
imposed on the Bank under the FDI Act prompt corrective action
provisions and the supervisory authority of the Federal and
state banking agencies.
USA
PATRIOT Act and Anti-Money Laundering Compliance
The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 and its implementing regulations
significantly expanded the anti-money laundering and financial
transparency laws, including the Bank Secrecy Act. The Bank has
adopted comprehensive policies and procedures to address the
requirements of the USA PATRIOT Act. Material deficiencies in
anti-money laundering compliance can result in public
enforcement actions by the banking agencies, including the
imposition of civil money penalties and supervisory restrictions
on growth and expansion. Such enforcement actions could also
have serious reputation consequences for Hanmi Financial and the
Bank.
Consumer
Laws
The Bank and Hanmi Financial are subject to many Federal and
state consumer protection laws and regulations prohibiting
unfair or fraudulent business practices, untrue or misleading
advertising and unfair competition, including:
|
|
|
The Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act of 1994
(HOEPA), which requires extra disclosures and consumer
protections to borrowers from certain lending practices, such as
practices deemed to be predatory lending.
|
|
|
Privacy policies required by Federal and state banking laws and
regulations, which limit the ability of banks and other
financial institutions to disclose non-public information about
consumers to non-affiliated third parties.
|
|
|
The Fair Credit Reporting Act, as amended by the Fair and
Accurate Credit Transactions Act (the FACT Act),
which requires financial firms to help deter identity theft,
including developing appropriate fraud response programs, and
gives consumers more control of their credit data.
|
|
|
The Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA), which
generally prohibits discrimination in any credit transaction,
whether for consumer or business purposes, on the basis of race,
color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, age
(except in limited circumstances), receipt of income from public
assistance programs, or good faith exercise of any rights under
the Consumer Credit Protection Act.
|
|
|
The Truth in Lending Act (TILA), which requires that
credit terms be disclosed in a meaningful and consistent way so
that consumers may compare credit terms more readily and
knowledgeably.
|
|
|
The Fair Housing Act, which regulates many lending practices,
including making it unlawful for any lender to discriminate in
its housing-related lending activities against any person
because of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, handicap
or familial status.
|
|
|
The CRA, which requires insured depository institutions, while
operating safely and soundly, to help meet the credit needs of
their communities; directs the Federal regulatory agencies, in
examining insured depository institutions, to assess a
banks record of helping meet the credit needs of its
entire community, including low- and moderate-income
neighborhoods, consistent with safe and sound banking practices
and further requires the agencies to take a financial
institutions record of meeting its community credit needs
into account when evaluating applications for, among other
things, domestic branches, mergers or acquisitions, or holding
company formations. In its last examination for CRA compliance,
as of October 10, 2006, the Bank was rated
Outstanding.
|
|
|
The Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA), which
includes a fair lending aspect that requires the
collection and disclosure of data about applicant and borrower
characteristics as a way of identifying possible discriminatory
lending patterns and enforcing anti-discrimination statutes.
|
|
|
The Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA),
which requires lenders to provide borrowers with disclosures
regarding the nature and cost of real estate settlements and
prohibits certain abusive practices, such as kickbacks.
|
|
|
The National Flood Insurance Act, which requires homes in
flood-prone areas with mortgages from a federally regulated
lender to have flood insurance.
|
11
Regulation
of Subsidiaries
Non-bank subsidiaries are subject to additional or separate
regulation and supervision by other state, Federal and
self-regulatory bodies. Chun-Ha and All World are subject to the
licensing and supervisory authority of the California
Commissioner of Insurance.
Together with the other information on the risks we face and our
management of risk contained in this Annual Report or in our
other SEC filings, the following presents significant risks that
may affect us. Events or circumstances arising from one or more
of these risks could adversely affect our business, financial
condition, operating results and prospects and the value and
price of our common stock could decline. The risks identified
below are not intended to be a comprehensive list of all risks
we face and additional risks that we may currently view as not
material may also impair our business operations and results.
Changes in economic conditions could materially hurt our
business. Our business is directly affected
by changes in economic conditions, including finance,
legislative and regulatory changes and changes in government
monetary and fiscal policies and inflation, all of which are
beyond our control. Deterioration in economic conditions could
result in the following consequences:
|
|
|
problem assets and foreclosures may increase;
|
|
|
demand for our products and services may decline;
|
|
|
low cost or non-interest bearing deposits may decrease; and
|
|
|
collateral for loans made by us, especially real estate, may
decline in value.
|
Recent negative developments in the financial industry and
U.S. and global credit markets may affect our operations
and results. Negative developments in the
latter half of 2007 in the subprime mortgage market and the
securitization markets for such loans have resulted in
uncertainty in the financial markets generally and the
expectation of a general economic downturn beginning in 2008.
Commercial as well as consumer loan portfolio performances have
deteriorated at many institutions and the competition for
deposits and quality loans has increased significantly. In
addition, the values of real estate collateral supporting many
commercial loans and home mortgages have declined and may
continue. Bank and bank holding company stock prices have been
negatively affected as has the ability of banks and bank holding
companies to raise capital or borrow in the debt markets
compared to recent years. As a result, there is a potential for
new Federal or state laws and regulations regarding lending and
funding practices and liquidity standards, and bank regulatory
agencies are expected to be very aggressive in responding to
concerns and trends identified in examinations, including the
expected issuance of many formal enforcement orders. Negative
developments in the financial industry and the impact of new
legislation in response to those developments could negatively
affect our operations by restricting our business operations,
including our ability to originate or sell loans, and adversely
affect our financial performance.
Our Southern California business focus and economic
conditions in Southern California could adversely affect our
operations. The Banks operations are
located primarily in Los Angeles and Orange counties. Because of
this geographic concentration, our results depend largely upon
economic conditions in these areas. Deterioration in economic
conditions in the Banks market area, or a significant
natural or man-made disaster in these market areas, could have a
material adverse effect on the quality of the Banks loan
portfolio, the demand for its products and services and on its
overall financial condition and results of operations.
Our concentrations in commercial real estate loans located
primarily in Southern California could have adverse effects on
credit quality. Approximately
30.7 percent of the Banks loan portfolio consists of
commercial real estate and construction loans, primarily in
Southern California. Because of this concentration, a
deterioration of the Southern California commercial real estate
market could have adverse consequences for the Bank. Among the
factors that could contribute to such a decline are general
economic conditions in Southern California, interest rates and
local market construction and sales activity.
Our earnings are affected by changing interest
rates. Changes in interest rates affect the
level of loans, deposits and investments, the credit profile of
existing loans, the rates received on loans and securities and
the rates paid on deposits and borrowings. Significant
fluctuations in interest rates may have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
If we cannot attract deposits, our growth may be
inhibited. Our ability to increase our asset
base depends in large part on our ability to attract additional
deposits at favorable rates. We seek additional deposits by
offering deposit products that are competitive with those
offered by other financial institutions in our markets. We
cannot assure you that these efforts will be successful.
We must manage our funding resources to enable us to meet
our ongoing operations costs and our deposit and borrowing
obligations as they come due. Liquidity is
essential to our business and any inability to raise funds could
have a substantial negative effect on our liquidity. Sources of
funds to meet our operating needs and obligations include
deposits; interest and
12
fee income on loans and other products and services; earnings on
our investment securities portfolio; revenue from the sale or
securitization of loans; new capital infusions and borrowings,
such as from the Federal Home Loan Banks. Adverse regulatory
developments or a decline in our financial condition or a
decline in financial market conditions generally, such as the
recent turmoil faced by depository financial institutions in the
domestic and worldwide credit markets, could have a significant
impact on our ability to meet our liquidity needs, including our
ability to attract deposits in an increasingly competitive
environment.
We may not be able to pay dividends in the
future. A substantial source of Hanmi
Financials income from which we pay Hanmi Financial
obligations and distribute dividends to our stockholders is from
the receipt of dividends from the Bank. The availability of
dividends from the Bank is limited by various statutes and
regulations. As a result of our net loss for 2007 after the
goodwill impairment charge and the increased provision for
credit losses, the Bank must obtain the prior approval of the
DFI and the FRB in order to pay dividends to Hanmi Financial. In
the event the Bank is unable to pay dividends to us, we may not
be able to service our debt, pay our obligations or pay
dividends on our outstanding common stock. See
Item 5. Market for Registrants Common
Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities for a further discussion of
restrictions on the Banks ability to pay dividends to
Hanmi Financial.
Our operations may require us to raise additional capital
in the future, but that capital may not be available or may not
be on terms acceptable to us when it is
needed. We are required by Federal regulatory
authorities to maintain adequate levels of capital to support
our operations. We believe that our existing capital resources
will satisfy our capital requirements for the foreseeable future
and will be sufficient to offset any problem assets. However,
should our asset quality erode and require significant
additional provision, resulting in consistent net operating
losses at the Bank, our capital levels will decline and we will
need to raise capital. Our ability to raise additional capital,
if needed, will depend on conditions in the capital markets at
that time, which are outside our control, and on our financial
performance. Accordingly, we cannot be certain of our ability to
raise additional capital if needed or on terms acceptable to us.
If we cannot raise additional capital when needed, our ability
to further expand our operations through internal growth and
acquisitions could be materially impaired.
The short-term and long-term impact of the new
Basel II capital standards and the forthcoming new capital
rules to be proposed for non-Basel II U.S. banks is
uncertain. As a result of the recent
deterioration in the global credit markets and the potential
impact of increased liquidity risk and interest rate risk, it is
unclear what the short-term impact of the implementation
Basel II may be or what impact a pending alternative
standardized approach to Basel II option for
non-Basel II U.S. banks may have on the cost and
availability of different types of credit and the potential
compliance costs of implementing the new capital standards.
We are subject to government regulations that could limit
or restrict our activities, which in turn could adversely affect
our operations. The financial services
industry is subject to extensive Federal and state supervision
and regulation. Significant new laws, changes in existing laws,
or repeals of existing laws may cause our results to differ
materially. Further, Federal monetary policy, particularly as
implemented through the Federal Reserve System, significantly
affects credit conditions and a material change in these
conditions could have a material adverse affect on our financial
condition and results of operations.
Competition may adversely affect our
performance. The banking and financial
services businesses in our market areas are highly competitive.
We face competition in attracting deposits, in making loans and
attracting and retaining employees. The increasingly competitive
environment is a result of changes in regulation, changes in
technology and product delivery systems, new competitors in the
market, and the pace of consolidation among financial services
providers. Our results in the future may differ depending upon
the nature and level of competition.
If a significant number of borrowers, guarantors or
related parties fail to perform as required by the terms of
their loans, we could sustain losses. A
significant source of risk arises from the possibility that
losses will be sustained because borrowers, guarantors or
related parties may fail to perform in accordance with the terms
of their loans. We have adopted underwriting and credit
monitoring procedures and credit policies, including the
establishment and review of the allowance for loan losses, that
management believes are appropriate to limit this risk by
assessing the likelihood of non-performance, tracking loan
performance and diversifying our credit portfolio. These
policies and procedures, however, may not prevent unexpected
losses that could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition and results of operations. As described
herein, the Bank substantially increased its provision for
credit losses in 2007, as compared to 2006 and 2005, as a result
of increases in historical loss factors, increased charge-offs
and migration of more loans into more adverse risk categories.
Failure to manage our growth may adversely affect our
performance. Our financial performance and
profitability depend on our ability to manage our recent and
possible future
13
growth. Future acquisitions and our continued growth may present
operating, integration and other issues that could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows.
We continually encounter technological change, and we may
have fewer resources than many of our competitors to continue to
invest in technological improvements. The
financial services industry is undergoing rapid technological
changes, with frequent introductions of new technology-driven
products and services. The effective use of technology increases
efficiency and enables financial institutions to better serve
customers and to reduce costs. Our future success will depend,
in part, upon our ability to address the needs of our clients by
using technology to provide products and services that will
satisfy client demands for convenience, as well as to create
additional efficiencies in our operations. Many of our
competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in
technological improvements. We may not be able to effectively
implement new technology-driven products and services or be
successful in marketing these products and services to our
customers.
We rely on communications, information, operating and
financial control systems technology from third-party service
providers, and we may suffer an interruption in those
systems. We rely heavily on third-party
service providers for much of our communications, information,
operating and financial control systems technology, including
our internet banking services and data processing systems. Any
failure or interruption of these services or systems or breaches
in security of these systems could result in failures or
interruptions in our customer relationship management, general
ledger, deposit, servicing
and/or loan
origination systems. The occurrence of any failures or
interruptions may require us to identify alternative sources of
such services, and we cannot assure you that we could negotiate
terms that are as favorable to us, or could obtain services with
similar functionality as found in our existing systems without
the need to expend substantial resources, if at all.
Negative publicity could damage our
reputation. Reputation risk, or the risk to
our earnings and capital from negative publicity or public
opinion, is inherent in our business. Negative publicity or
public opinion could adversely affect our ability to keep and
attract customers and expose us to adverse legal and regulatory
consequences. Negative public opinion could result from our
actual or perceived conduct in any number of activities,
including lending practices, corporate governance, regulatory
compliance, mergers and acquisitions, and disclosure, sharing or
inadequate protection of customer information, and from actions
taken by government regulators and community organizations in
response to that conduct.
Our stock price can be volatile due to many
factors. Our stock price can fluctuate widely
in response to a variety of factors, in addition to those
described above, including:
|
|
|
recommendations by securities analysts;
|
|
|
operating and stock price performance of other companies that
investors deem comparable to us;
|
|
|
news reports relating to trends, concerns and other issues in
the financial services industry;
|
|
|
new technology used, or services offered, by our competitors;
|
|
|
natural disasters, such as earthquakes; and
|
|
|
geopolitical conditions such as acts or threats of terrorism or
military conflicts.
|
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
None.
14
Hanmi Financials principal office is located at 3660
Wilshire Boulevard, Penthouse Suite A, Los Angeles,
California. The office is leased pursuant to a five-year term,
which expires on November 30, 2008.
The following table sets forth information about our offices:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned/
|
Office
|
|
Type of
Office
|
|
Address
|
|
City/State
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Corporate Headquarters
|
|
Headquarters(1)
|
|
3660 Wilshire Boulevard, Penthouse Suite A
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Cerritos Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
11754 East Artesia Boulevard
|
|
Artesia, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Downtown Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
950 South Los Angeles Street
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Fashion District Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
726 East 12th Street, Suite 211
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Fullerton Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
5245 Beach Boulevard
|
|
Buena Park, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Garden Grove Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
9820 Garden Grove Boulevard
|
|
Garden Grove, CA
|
|
Owned
|
Gardena Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
2001 West Redondo Beach Boulevard
|
|
Gardena, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Irvine Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
14474 Culver Drive, Suite D
|
|
Irvine, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Koreatown Galleria Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
3250 West Olympic Boulevard, Suite 200
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Koreatown Plaza Branch
|
|
Branch(2)
|
|
928 South Western Avenue, Suite 260
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Mid-Olympic Branch
|
|
Branch(3)
|
|
3099 West Olympic Boulevard
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Owned
|
Olympic Branch
|
|
Branch(4)
|
|
3737 West Olympic Boulevard
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Owned
|
Rancho Cucamonga Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
9759 Baseline Road
|
|
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Rowland Heights Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
18720 East Colima Road
|
|
Rowland Heights, CA
|
|
Leased
|
San Diego Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
4637 Convoy Street, Suite 101
|
|
San Diego, CA
|
|
Leased
|
San Francisco Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
1491 Webster Street
|
|
San Francisco, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Silicon Valley Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
2765 El Camino Real
|
|
Santa Clara, CA
|
|
Leased
|
South Cerritos Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
11900 South Street, Suite 109
|
|
Cerritos, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Torrance Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
2370 Crenshaw Boulevard, Suite H
|
|
Torrance, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Van Nuys Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
14427 Sherman Way
|
|
Van Nuys, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Vermont Branch
|
|
Branch(5)
|
|
933 South Vermont Avenue
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Owned
|
West Garden Grove Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
9122 Garden Grove Boulevard
|
|
Garden Grove, CA
|
|
Owned
|
West Torrance Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
21838 Hawthorne Boulevard
|
|
Torrance, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Western Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
120 South Western Avenue
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Wilshire Branch
|
|
Main
Branch(6)
|
|
3660 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 103
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Commercial Loan Department
|
|
Loan
Office(1)
|
|
3660 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1050
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Leased
|
SBA Loan Department
|
|
Loan
Office(1)
|
|
3327 Wilshire Boulevard
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Atlanta LPO
|
|
Loan
Office(1)
|
|
3585 Peachtree Industrial Boulevard, Suite 144
|
|
Duluth, GA
|
|
Leased
|
Chicago LPO
|
|
Loan
Office(1)
|
|
6200 North Hiawatha, Suite 235
|
|
Chicago, IL
|
|
Leased
|
Dallas LPO
|
|
Loan
Office(1)
|
|
2711 LBJ Freeway, Suite 114
|
|
Farmers Branch, TX
|
|
Leased
|
Denver LPO
|
|
Loan
Office(1)
|
|
3033 South Parker Road, Suite 340
|
|
Aurora, CO
|
|
Leased
|
Northern California LPO
|
|
Loan
Office(1)
|
|
39899 Balentine Drive, Suite 200
|
|
Newark, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Northwest Region LPO
|
|
Loan
Office(1)
|
|
3500 108th Avenue Northeast, Suite 280
|
|
Bellevue, WA
|
|
Leased
|
Virginia LPO
|
|
Loan
Office(1)
|
|
7535 Little River Turnpike, Suite 200B
|
|
Annandale, VA
|
|
Leased
|
Chun-Ha Insurance Services
|
|
Headquarters(1)
|
|
12912 Brookhurst Street, Suite 480
|
|
Garden Grove, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Chun-Ha Insurance Services
|
|
Insurance
Office(1)
|
|
3225 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1806
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Leased
|
All World Insurance Services
|
|
Headquarters(1)
|
|
12912 Brookhurst Street, Suite 480
|
|
Garden Grove, CA
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Deposits
are not accepted at this facility. |
|
(2)
|
|
Residential
Mortgage Center is also located at this facility. |
|
(3)
|
|
Auto
Loan Center and Consumer Loan Center are also located at this
facility. |
|
(4)
|
|
Training
Facility is also located at this facility. |
|
(5)
|
|
Administrative
offices are also located at this facility. |
|
(6)
|
|
International
Finance Department is also located at this facility. |
Hanmi Financial and its subsidiaries consider their present
facilities to be sufficient for their current operations.
15
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
From time to time, Hanmi Financial and its subsidiaries are
parties to litigation that arises in the ordinary course of
business, such as claims to enforce liens, claims involving the
origination and servicing of loans, and other issues related to
the business of Hanmi Financial and its subsidiaries. In the
opinion of management, the resolution of any such issues would
not have a material adverse impact on the financial condition,
results of operations, or liquidity of Hanmi Financial or its
subsidiaries.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
During the fourth quarter of 2007, no matters were submitted to
stockholders for a vote.
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
For Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
And Issuer Purchases Of Equity Securities
|
Market
Information
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the
high and low trading prices of Hanmi Financials common
stock for the last two years as reported by NASDAQ under the
symbol HAFC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Cash
Dividend
|
|
|
|
|
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
16.70
|
|
|
$
|
8.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.06 per share
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
17.39
|
|
|
$
|
14.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.06 per share
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
19.50
|
|
|
$
|
15.74
|
|
|
$
|
0.06 per share
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
23.18
|
|
|
$
|
18.58
|
|
|
$
|
0.06 per share
|
|
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
22.88
|
|
|
$
|
18.89
|
|
|
$
|
0.06 per share
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
20.00
|
|
|
$
|
18.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.06 per share
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
20.46
|
|
|
$
|
17.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.06 per share
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
19.95
|
|
|
$
|
17.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.06 per share
|
|
|
|
Holders
Hanmi Financial had 347 registered stockholders of record as of
February 7, 2008.
Dividends
The ability of Hanmi Financial to pay dividends to our
shareholders is directly dependent on the ability of the Bank to
pay dividends to us. Section 642 of the California
Financial Code provides that neither a California
state-chartered bank nor a majority-owned subsidiary of a bank
can pay dividends to its shareholders in an amount which exceeds
the lesser of (a) the retained earnings of the bank or
(b) the net income of the bank for its last three fiscal
years, in each case less the amount of any previous
distributions made during such period. As a result of the net
loss incurred by the Bank in 2007, the Bank is currently not
able to pay dividends to Hanmi Financial under Section 642.
However, Financial Code Section 643 provides,
alternatively, that, notwithstanding the foregoing restriction,
dividends in an amount not exceeding the greatest of
(a) the retained earnings of the bank; (b) the net
income of the bank for its last fiscal year or (c) the net
income of the bank for its current fiscal year may be declared
with the prior approval of the California Commissioner of
Financial Institutions. The Bank had retained earnings of
$52.8 million as of December 31, 2007.
Similarly, the net loss for 2007 requires prior FRB approval of
bank dividends in 2008 to Hanmi Financial. FRB Regulation H
Section 208.5 provides that the Bank must obtain FRB
approval to declare and pay a dividend if the total of all
dividends declared during the calendar year, including the
proposed dividend, exceeds the sum of the Banks net income
during the current calendar year and the retained net income of
the prior two calendar years. The Bank will seek prior approval
from the DFI and the FRB to pay cash dividends to Hanmi
Financial.
There can be no assurance when or if these approvals would be
granted, or that, even if granted, the Board of Directors will
continue to authorize cash dividends to our shareholders.
16
Securities
Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table summarizes information as of
December 31, 2007 relating to equity compensation plans of
Hanmi Financial pursuant to which grants of options, restricted
stock awards or other rights to acquire shares may be granted
from time to time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
Available for
|
|
|
|
Number of
Securities to be
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Future
Issuance Under
|
|
|
|
Issued
Upon Exercise of
|
|
|
Exercise
Price of
|
|
|
Equity
Compensation
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
Options,
|
|
|
Outstanding
Options,
|
|
|
Plans
(Excluding Securities
|
|
|
|
Warrants
and Rights
|
|
|
Warrants
and Rights (b)
|
|
|
Reflected
in Column (a))
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans Approved By Security Holders
|
|
|
1,472,766
|
|
|
$
|
15.33
|
|
|
|
2,879,000
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved By Security Holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity Compensation Plans
|
|
|
1,472,766
|
|
|
$
|
15.33
|
|
|
|
2,879,000
|
|
|
|
17
Performance
Graph
The following graph shows a comparison of stockholder return on
Hanmi Financials common stock with the cumulative total
returns for: 1) the NASDAQ
Composite®
(U.S.) Index; 2) the Standard and Poors
(S&P) 500 Financials Index; and 3) the SNL
Bank $1B-$5B Index, which was compiled by SNL Financial LC of
Charlottesville, Virginia. The SNL Bank $1B-$5B Index was added
to the graph this year to enhance comparisons of Hanmi
Financials performance to other companies with similar
market capitalizations. The graph assumes an initial investment
of $100 and reinvestment of dividends. The graph is historical
only and may not be indicative of possible future performance.
The performance graph shall not be deemed incorporated by
reference to any general statement incorporating by reference
this Annual Report into any filing under the Securities Act of
1933 or under the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we
specifically incorporate this information by reference, and
shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.
TOTAL RETURN
PERFORMANCE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Index
|
|
Symbol
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Hanmi Financial
|
|
|
HAFC
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
121.24
|
|
|
$
|
223.44
|
|
|
$
|
224.61
|
|
|
$
|
286.92
|
|
|
$
|
111.66
|
|
NASDAQ Composite
|
|
|
ˆ IXIC
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
150.01
|
|
|
$
|
162.89
|
|
|
$
|
165.13
|
|
|
$
|
180.85
|
|
|
$
|
198.60
|
|
S&P 500 Financials
|
|
|
S5FINL
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
127.92
|
|
|
$
|
138.45
|
|
|
$
|
143.61
|
|
|
$
|
166.82
|
|
|
$
|
132.05
|
|
SNL Bank $1B-$5B
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
135.99
|
|
|
$
|
167.83
|
|
|
$
|
164.97
|
|
|
$
|
190.90
|
|
|
$
|
139.06
|
|
|
|
18
Purchases of
Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
On April 25, 2006, the Board of Directors of Hanmi
Financial authorized the repurchase of up to $50.0 million
of common stock. The following are details on repurchases under
this program for the fourth quarter of 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
Maximum Number (or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
Average
|
|
|
(c) Total
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Approximate
Dollar
|
|
|
|
(a )Total
Number
|
|
|
Price
Paid
|
|
|
(or
Units) Purchased as
|
|
|
Value) of
Shares (or Units)
|
|
|
|
of Shares
(or
|
|
|
per
Share
|
|
|
Part of
Publicly Announced
|
|
|
that May
Yet Be Purchased
|
|
Period
|
|
Units)
Purchased
|
|
|
(or
Unit)
|
|
|
Plans or
Programs
|
|
|
Under the
Plans or Programs
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases from October 1, 2007 to October 31, 2007
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
$
|
16.57
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
$
|
11,074,000
|
|
Repurchases from November 1, 2007 to November 30, 2007
|
|
|
1,060,400
|
|
|
$
|
9.62
|
|
|
|
1,060,400
|
|
|
$
|
798,000
|
|
Repurchases from December 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007
|
|
|
82,000
|
|
|
$
|
9.34
|
|
|
|
82,000
|
|
|
$
|
29,000
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,144,400
|
|
|
$
|
9.62
|
|
|
|
1,144,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
The following table presents selected historical financial
information, including per share information as adjusted for the
stock dividends and stock splits declared by us. This selected
historical financial data should be read in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto
appearing elsewhere in this Report and the information contained
in Item 7. Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The selected historical financial data as of and for each of
the years in the five years ended December 31, 2007 is
derived from our audited financial statements. In the opinion of
management, the information presented reflects all adjustments,
including normal and recurring accruals, considered necessary
for a fair presentation of the results of such periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share data)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income
|
|
$
|
280,896
|
|
|
$
|
260,189
|
|
|
$
|
200,941
|
|
|
$
|
135,554
|
|
|
$
|
77,417
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
128,693
|
|
|
|
106,429
|
|
|
|
62,111
|
|
|
|
32,617
|
|
|
|
20,796
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income Before Provision for Credit Losses
|
|
|
152,203
|
|
|
|
153,760
|
|
|
|
138,830
|
|
|
|
102,937
|
|
|
|
56,621
|
|
Provision for Credit Losses
|
|
|
38,323
|
|
|
|
7,173
|
|
|
|
5,395
|
|
|
|
2,907
|
|
|
|
5,680
|
|
Non-Interest Income
|
|
|
40,006
|
|
|
|
36,963
|
|
|
|
31,450
|
|
|
|
26,211
|
|
|
|
20,022
|
|
Non-Interest Expenses
|
|
|
189,929
|
|
|
|
77,313
|
|
|
|
70,201
|
|
|
|
66,566
|
|
|
|
39,325
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
(36,043
|
)
|
|
|
106,237
|
|
|
|
94,684
|
|
|
|
59,675
|
|
|
|
31,638
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
24,477
|
|
|
|
40,588
|
|
|
|
36,455
|
|
|
|
22,975
|
|
|
|
12,425
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
$
|
(60,520
|
)
|
|
$
|
65,649
|
|
|
$
|
58,229
|
|
|
$
|
36,700
|
|
|
$
|
19,213
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY BALANCE SHEETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
$
|
122,398
|
|
|
$
|
138,501
|
|
|
$
|
163,477
|
|
|
$
|
127,164
|
|
|
$
|
62,595
|
|
Total Investment Securities
|
|
|
350,457
|
|
|
|
391,579
|
|
|
|
443,912
|
|
|
|
418,973
|
|
|
|
414,616
|
|
Net
Loans(1)
|
|
|
3,241,097
|
|
|
|
2,837,390
|
|
|
|
2,469,080
|
|
|
|
2,234,842
|
|
|
|
1,248,399
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
3,983,746
|
|
|
|
3,725,243
|
|
|
|
3,414,252
|
|
|
|
3,104,188
|
|
|
|
1,787,139
|
|
Total Deposits
|
|
|
3,001,699
|
|
|
|
2,944,715
|
|
|
|
2,826,114
|
|
|
|
2,528,807
|
|
|
|
1,445,835
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
3,612,201
|
|
|
|
3,238,126
|
|
|
|
2,987,475
|
|
|
|
2,704,278
|
|
|
|
1,647,672
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
371,545
|
|
|
|
487,117
|
|
|
|
426,777
|
|
|
|
399,910
|
|
|
|
139,467
|
|
Tangible Equity
|
|
|
257,537
|
|
|
|
273,159
|
|
|
|
209,028
|
|
|
|
178,791
|
|
|
|
137,424
|
|
Average Net Loans
|
|
|
3,049,775
|
|
|
|
2,721,229
|
|
|
|
2,359,439
|
|
|
|
1,912,534
|
|
|
|
1,103,765
|
|
Average Investment Securities
|
|
|
368,144
|
|
|
|
414,672
|
|
|
|
418,750
|
|
|
|
425,537
|
|
|
|
379,635
|
|
Average Interest-Earning Assets
|
|
|
3,494,758
|
|
|
|
3,214,761
|
|
|
|
2,871,564
|
|
|
|
2,387,412
|
|
|
|
1,538,820
|
|
Average Total Assets
|
|
|
3,882,891
|
|
|
|
3,602,181
|
|
|
|
3,249,190
|
|
|
|
2,670,701
|
|
|
|
1,623,214
|
|
Average Deposits
|
|
|
2,989,806
|
|
|
|
2,881,448
|
|
|
|
2,632,254
|
|
|
|
2,129,724
|
|
|
|
1,416,564
|
|
Average Borrowings
|
|
|
355,819
|
|
|
|
221,347
|
|
|
|
165,482
|
|
|
|
223,780
|
|
|
|
63,138
|
|
Average Interest-Bearing Liabilities
|
|
|
2,643,296
|
|
|
|
2,367,389
|
|
|
|
2,046,227
|
|
|
|
1,687,688
|
|
|
|
1,057,249
|
|
Average Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
492,637
|
|
|
|
458,227
|
|
|
|
417,813
|
|
|
|
293,313
|
|
|
|
132,369
|
|
Average Tangible Equity
|
|
|
275,036
|
|
|
|
242,362
|
|
|
|
198,527
|
|
|
|
143,262
|
|
|
|
130,252
|
|
PER SHARE DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (Loss) Per Share Basic
|
|
$
|
(1.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.34
|
|
|
$
|
1.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
Earnings (Loss) Per Share Diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.33
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.84
|
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
Book Value Per
Share(2)
|
|
$
|
8.10
|
|
|
$
|
9.93
|
|
|
$
|
8.77
|
|
|
$
|
8.11
|
|
|
$
|
4.92
|
|
Tangible Book Value Per
Share(3)
|
|
$
|
5.62
|
|
|
$
|
5.57
|
|
|
$
|
4.30
|
|
|
$
|
3.62
|
|
|
$
|
4.85
|
|
Cash Dividends Per Share
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
Common Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
45,860,941
|
|
|
|
49,076,613
|
|
|
|
48,658,798
|
|
|
|
49,330,704
|
|
|
|
28,326,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Loans
receivable, net of allowance for loan losses and deferred loan
fees, and loans held for sale. |
|
(2)
|
|
Total
stockholders equity divided by common shares
outstanding. |
|
(3)
|
|
Tangible
equity divided by common shares outstanding. |
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
SELECTED PERFORMANCE RATIOS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Average
Assets(4)
|
|
|
(1.56
|
)%
|
|
|
1.82
|
%
|
|
|
1.79
|
%
|
|
|
1.37
|
%
|
|
|
1.18
|
%
|
Return on Average Stockholders
Equity(5)
|
|
|
(12.28
|
)%
|
|
|
14.33
|
%
|
|
|
13.94
|
%
|
|
|
12.51
|
%
|
|
|
14.51
|
%
|
Return on Average Tangible Equity
(6)
|
|
|
(22.00
|
)%
|
|
|
27.09
|
%
|
|
|
29.33
|
%
|
|
|
25.62
|
%
|
|
|
14.75
|
%
|
Net Interest
Spread(7)
|
|
|
3.17
|
%
|
|
|
3.59
|
%
|
|
|
3.96
|
%
|
|
|
3.75
|
%
|
|
|
3.06
|
%
|
Net Interest
Margin(8)
|
|
|
4.36
|
%
|
|
|
4.78
|
%
|
|
|
4.83
|
%
|
|
|
4.31
|
%
|
|
|
3.68
|
%
|
Efficiency
Ratio(9)
|
|
|
98.81
|
%
|
|
|
40.54
|
%
|
|
|
40.86
|
%
|
|
|
51.54
|
%
|
|
|
51.31
|
%
|
Dividend Payout
Ratio(10)
|
|
|
(18.90
|
)%
|
|
|
17.91
|
%
|
|
|
16.95
|
%
|
|
|
22.99
|
%
|
|
|
29.41
|
%
|
Average Stockholders Equity to Average Total Assets
|
|
|
12.69
|
%
|
|
|
12.72
|
%
|
|
|
12.86
|
%
|
|
|
10.98
|
%
|
|
|
8.15
|
%
|
SELECTED CAPITAL RATIOS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital to Total Risk-Weighted Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hanmi Financial
|
|
|
10.65
|
%
|
|
|
12.55
|
%
|
|
|
12.04
|
%
|
|
|
11.98
|
%
|
|
|
11.13
|
%
|
Hanmi Bank
|
|
|
10.59
|
%
|
|
|
12.28
|
%
|
|
|
11.98
|
%
|
|
|
11.80
|
%
|
|
|
11.09
|
%
|
Tier 1 Capital to Total Risk-Weighted Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hanmi Financial
|
|
|
9.40
|
%
|
|
|
11.58
|
%
|
|
|
11.03
|
%
|
|
|
10.93
|
%
|
|
|
10.05
|
%
|
Hanmi Bank
|
|
|
9.34
|
%
|
|
|
11.31
|
%
|
|
|
10.96
|
%
|
|
|
10.75
|
%
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 Capital to Average Total Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hanmi Financial
|
|
|
8.52
|
%
|
|
|
10.08
|
%
|
|
|
9.11
|
%
|
|
|
8.93
|
%
|
|
|
7.80
|
%
|
Hanmi Bank
|
|
|
8.47
|
%
|
|
|
9.85
|
%
|
|
|
9.06
|
%
|
|
|
8.78
|
%
|
|
|
7.75
|
%
|
SELECTED ASSET QUALITY RATIOS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Performing Loans to Total Gross
Loans(11)
|
|
|
1.66
|
%
|
|
|
0.50
|
%
|
|
|
0.41
|
%
|
|
|
0.27
|
%
|
|
|
0.68
|
%
|
Non-Performing Assets to Total
Assets(12)
|
|
|
1.37
|
%
|
|
|
0.38
|
%
|
|
|
0.30
|
%
|
|
|
0.19
|
%
|
|
|
0.48
|
%
|
Net Loan Charge-Offs to Average Total Gross Loans
|
|
|
0.73
|
%
|
|
|
0.17
|
%
|
|
|
0.12
|
%
|
|
|
0.19
|
%
|
|
|
0.29
|
%
|
Allowance for Loan Losses to Total Gross Loans
|
|
|
1.33
|
%
|
|
|
0.96
|
%
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
|
|
1.06
|
%
|
Allowance for Loan Losses to Non-Performing Loans
|
|
|
80.05
|
%
|
|
|
193.86
|
%
|
|
|
246.40
|
%
|
|
|
377.49
|
%
|
|
|
154.13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Net
income (loss) divided by average total assets. |
|
(5)
|
|
Net
income (loss) divided by average stockholders
equity. |
|
(6)
|
|
Net
income (loss) divided by average tangible equity. |
|
(7)
|
|
Average
yield earned on interest-earning assets less average rate paid
on interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(8)
|
|
Net
interest income before provision for credit losses divided by
average interest-earning assets. |
|
(9)
|
|
Total
non-interest expenses divided by the sum of net interest income
before provision for credit losses and total non-interest
income. |
|
(10)
|
|
Dividends
declared per share divided by basic earnings (loss) per
share. |
|
(11)
|
|
Non-performing
loans consist of non-accrual loans, loans past due 90 days
or more and restructured loans. |
|
(12)
|
|
Non-performing
assets consist of non-performing loans and other real estate
owned. |
Non-GAAP Financial
Measures
Return on
Average Tangible Equity
Return on average tangible equity is supplemental financial
information determined by a method other than in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP). This non-GAAP measure is used by management
in the analysis of Hanmi Financials performance. Average
tangible equity is calculated by subtracting average goodwill
and average other intangible assets from average
stockholders equity. Banking and financial institution
regulators also exclude goodwill and other intangible assets
from stockholders equity when assessing the capital
adequacy of a financial institution. Management believes the
presentation of this financial measure excluding the impact of
these items provides useful supplemental information that is
essential to a proper understanding of the financial results of
Hanmi Financial, as it provides a method to assess
managements success in utilizing tangible capital. This
disclosure should not be viewed as a substitution for results
determined in accordance with GAAP, nor is it necessarily
comparable to non-GAAP performance measures that may be
presented by other companies.
21
The following table reconciles this non-GAAP performance measure
to the GAAP performance measure for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
Average Stockholders Equity
|
|
$
|
492,637
|
|
|
$
|
458,227
|
|
|
$
|
417,813
|
|
|
$
|
293,313
|
|
|
$
|
132,369
|
|
Less Average Goodwill and Average Other Intangible Assets
|
|
|
(217,601
|
)
|
|
|
(215,865
|
)
|
|
|
(219,286
|
)
|
|
|
(150,051
|
)
|
|
|
(2,117
|
)
|
|
|
Average Tangible Equity
|
|
$
|
275,036
|
|
|
$
|
242,362
|
|
|
$
|
198,527
|
|
|
$
|
143,262
|
|
|
$
|
130,252
|
|
|
|
Return on Average Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
(12.28
|
)%
|
|
|
14.33
|
%
|
|
|
13.94
|
%
|
|
|
12.51
|
%
|
|
|
14.51
|
%
|
Effect of Average Goodwill and Average Other Intangible Assets
|
|
|
(9.72
|
)%
|
|
|
12.76
|
%
|
|
|
15.39
|
%
|
|
|
13.11
|
%
|
|
|
0.24
|
%
|
|
|
Return on Average Tangible Equity
|
|
|
(22.00
|
)%
|
|
|
27.09
|
%
|
|
|
29.33
|
%
|
|
|
25.62
|
%
|
|
|
14.75
|
%
|
|
|
Tangible
Book Value Per Share
Tangible book value per share is supplemental financial
information determined by a method other than in accordance with
GAAP. This non-GAAP measure is used by management in the
analysis of Hanmi Financials performance. Tangible book
value per share is calculated by subtracting goodwill and other
intangible assets from total stockholders equity and
dividing the difference by the number of shares of common stock
outstanding. Management believes the presentation of this
financial measure excluding the impact of these items provides
useful supplemental information that is essential to a proper
understanding of the financial results of Hanmi Financial, as it
provides a method to assess managements success in
utilizing tangible capital. This disclosure should not be viewed
as a substitution for results determined in accordance with
GAAP, nor is it necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance
measures that may be presented by other companies.
The following table reconciles this non-GAAP performance measure
to the GAAP performance measure for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity
|
|
$
|
371,545
|
|
|
$
|
487,117
|
|
|
$
|
426,777
|
|
|
$
|
399,910
|
|
|
$
|
139,467
|
|
Less Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
|
|
|
(114,008
|
)
|
|
|
(213,958
|
)
|
|
|
(217,749
|
)
|
|
|
(221,119
|
)
|
|
|
(2,043
|
)
|
|
|
Tangible Equity
|
|
$
|
257,537
|
|
|
$
|
273,159
|
|
|
$
|
209,028
|
|
|
$
|
178,791
|
|
|
$
|
137,424
|
|
|
|
Book Value Per Share
|
|
$
|
8.10
|
|
|
$
|
9.93
|
|
|
$
|
8.77
|
|
|
$
|
8.11
|
|
|
$
|
4.92
|
|
Effect of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
|
|
|
(2.48
|
)
|
|
|
(4.36
|
)
|
|
|
(4.47
|
)
|
|
|
(4.49
|
)
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
Tangible Book Value Per Share
|
|
$
|
5.62
|
|
|
$
|
5.57
|
|
|
$
|
4.30
|
|
|
$
|
3.62
|
|
|
$
|
4.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of
Operations
|
This discussion presents managements analysis of the
financial condition and results of operations as of and for the
years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005. This
discussion should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated
Financial Statements and the Notes related thereto presented
elsewhere in this Report. This discussion and analysis contains
forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.
Our actual results could differ materially from those
anticipated in such forward-looking statements because of
certain factors discussed elsewhere in this Report. See
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Critical
Accounting Policies
We have established various accounting policies that govern the
application of GAAP in the preparation of our consolidated
financial statements. Our significant accounting policies are
described in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements, Note 1 Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies. Certain accounting policies
require us to make significant estimates and assumptions that
have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets
and liabilities, and we consider these critical accounting
policies. We use estimates and assumptions based on historical
experience and other factors that we believe to be reasonable
under the circumstances. Actual results could differ
significantly from these estimates and assumptions, which could
have a material impact on the
22
carrying value of assets and liabilities at the balance sheet
dates and our results of operations for the reporting periods.
Management has discussed the development and selection of these
critical accounting policies with the Audit Committee of Hanmi
Financials Board of Directors.
Allowance
for Loan Losses
We believe the allowance for loan losses and allowance for
off-balance sheet items are critical accounting policies that
require significant estimates and assumptions that are
particularly susceptible to significant change in the
preparation of our financial statements. Our allowance for loan
loss methodologies incorporate a variety of risk considerations,
both quantitative and qualitative, in establishing an allowance
for loan loss that management believes is appropriate at each
reporting date. Quantitative factors include our historical loss
experiences on ten segmented loan pools by risk rating,
delinquency and charge-off trends, collateral values, changes in
non-performing loans, and other factors. Qualitative factors
include the general economic environment in our markets,
delinquency and charge-off trends, and the change in
non-performing loans. Concentration of credit, change of lending
management and staff, quality of loan review system, and change
in interest rate are other qualitative factors that are
considered in our methodologies. See Financial
Condition Allowance for Loan Losses and Allowance
for Off-Balance Sheet Items, Results of
Operations Provision for Credit Losses and
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies for additional information on methodologies
used to determine the allowance for loan losses and allowance
for off-balance sheet items.
Loan
Sales
We routinely sell SBA and residential mortgage loans to
secondary market investors. When SBA guaranteed loans are sold,
we generally retain the right to service these loans. We may
record loan servicing assets when the benefits of servicing are
expected to be more than adequate compensation to a servicer. We
determine whether the benefits of servicing are expected to be
more than adequate compensation to a servicer by discounting all
of the future net cash flows associated with the contractual
rights and obligations of the servicing agreement. The expected
future net cash flows are discounted at a rate equal to the
return that would adequately compensate a substitute servicer
for performing the servicing. In addition to the anticipated
rate of loan prepayments and discount rates, other assumptions
(such as the cost to service the underlying loans, foreclosure
costs, ancillary income and float rates) are also used in
determining the value of the loan servicing assets. Loan
servicing assets are discussed in more detail in Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 1
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and
Note 4 Servicing Assets
presented elsewhere herein.
Goodwill
We have goodwill, which represents the excess of purchase price
over the fair value of net assets acquired, because of various
business acquisitions. As of December 31, 2007 and 2006,
goodwill was $107.1 million and $207.6 million,
respectively, which resulted primarily from the acquisition of
Pacific Union Bank (PUB) in 2004. In accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, goodwill must be recorded at the reporting
unit level. Reporting units are defined as an operating segment.
We have identified one reporting unit our banking
operations. SFAS No. 142 prohibits the amortization of
goodwill, but requires that it be tested for impairment at least
annually (at any time during the year, but at the same time each
year), or more frequently if events or circumstances change,
such as adverse changes in the business climate, that would more
likely than not reduce the reporting units fair value
below its carrying amount.
During our annual assessment of goodwill during the fourth
quarter of 2007, we recognized an impairment loss on goodwill of
$102.9 million based on the decline in the market value of
our common stock, which we believe reflects, in part, recent
turmoil in the financial markets that has adversely affected the
market value of the common stock of many banks. Goodwill is
discussed in more detail in Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements, Note 1 Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies and
Note 6 Goodwill presented
elsewhere herein.
Overview
In 2007, total assets increased 6.9 percent, reflecting the
weakening economy, compared to increases of 9.1 percent and
10.0 percent in 2006 and 2005. Total assets increased to
$3,983.7 million at December 31, 2007 from
$3,725.2 million and $3,414.3 million at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Net loans
increased to $3,241.1 million at December 31, 2007
from $2,837.4 million and $2,469.1 million at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Total deposits
increased to $3,001.7 million at December 31, 2007
from $2,944.7 million and $2,826.1 million at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Effective January 2, 2007, we completed the acquisitions of
Chun-Ha and All World, which had combined total assets of
$3.9 million on the date of acquisition. The acquisitions
were accounted for as
23
purchases, so the operating results and assets and liabilities
of Chun-Ha and All World are included from the acquisition date.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, we recognized a net
loss of $60.5 million, as compared with net income of
$65.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Such loss in 2007 was mainly caused by a goodwill impairment
charge of $102.9 million occasioned by the decline in the
market value of our common stock that reflects, in part, recent
turmoil in the financial markets. If we measure our operating
results from our continuing operations without this impairment
charge on a non-GAAP basis (as shown in the table below), we
realized net income of $42.4 million, as compared with
$65.6 million in 2006. Management believes the presentation
of this financial measure excluding the impact of these items
provides useful supplemental information that is essential to a
proper understanding of the financial results of Hanmi
Financial, as it provides a method to assess our results from
our core banking operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
(Numerator)
|
|
|
(Denominator)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP Net Loss
|
|
$
|
(60,520
|
)
|
|
|
47,787,213
|
|
|
$
|
(1.27
|
)
|
Impairment Loss on Goodwill
|
|
|
102,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive Securities Options and Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306,504
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP Net Income, Excluding Impairment Loss on Goodwill
|
|
$
|
42,371
|
|
|
|
48,093,717
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
The largest factor affecting our 2007 operating results was a
$38.3 million provision for credit losses, which increased
from $7.2 million and $5.4 million in 2006 and 2005,
respectively. In the last quarter of 2007, the economic
conditions in the markets in which our borrowers operate
continued to deteriorate and the levels of loan delinquency and
defaults experienced by the Bank were substantially higher than
historical levels. In response, the Bank has tightened its
credit standards and significantly expanded its loan portfolio
monitoring activities beyond the normal level of portfolio
monitoring to attempt to identify potential weaknesses in
performing loans. For loans with identified weaknesses, we have
created individual action plans to mitigate, to the extent
possible, such weaknesses. This effort resulted, in part, in
additional downgrades in the classification of loans, primarily
to special mention. For non-performing loans, we
have enhanced our collection efforts, increased workout and
collection personnel and created individual action plans to
maximize, to the extent possible, collections on such loans. We
will continue our monitoring of the loan portfolio until the
Banks credit risk profile returns to a normalized level.
Our primary source of revenue is net interest income, which is
the difference between interest and fees derived from earning
assets and interest paid on liabilities incurred to fund those
assets. Net interest income is affected by changes in the volume
of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. It
also is affected by changes in yields earned on interest-earning
assets and rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Despite
the growth in loans, net interest income in 2007 was essentially
flat at $152.2 million compared to $153.8 million in
2006 due to compression in the net interest margin that was
caused by the FRB lowering short-term interest rates and intense
competition for loans and deposits in our niche markets. The
Banks net interest margin was 4.36 percent in 2007,
compared to 4.78 percent a year ago.
We generated substantial non-interest income from service
charges on deposit accounts, charges and fees from international
trade finance, and gains on sales of loans. For the year ended
December 31, 2007, non-interest income was
$40.0 million, an increase of $3.0 million, or
8.2 percent, over the 2006 non-interest income of
$37.0 million. Such increase was mainly caused by an
increase in insurance commissions from the operation of two
insurance companies acquired in January 2007. For the year ended
December 31, 2005, non-interest income was
$31.5 million.
Non-interest expenses consist primarily of employee compensation
and benefits, occupancy and equipment expenses and data
processing expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2007,
non-interest expenses, excluding the goodwill impairment charge,
were $87.0 million (as shown in the table below), an
increase of $9.7 million, or 12.6 percent, over the
2006 non-interest expenses of $77.3 million. In 2007, the
increase was primarily the result of $1.7 million of
separation expenses for the retirement of our former Chief
Executive Officer and additional operating expenses from two
insurance companies acquired in January 2007. Our efficiency
ratio, excluding the goodwill impairment charge, was
45.28 percent in 2007 (as shown in the table below),
compared to 40.54 percent and 40.86 percent, in 2006
and 2005, respectively. Management believes the presentation of
these financial measures excluding the impact of these items
provides useful supplemental information that is essential to a
proper understanding of the financial results of Hanmi
Financial, as it provides a method to assess our results from
our core banking operations.
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP Total Non-Interest Expenses
|
|
$
|
189,929
|
|
|
$
|
77,313
|
|
|
$
|
70,201
|
|
Deduct Impairment Loss on Goodwill
|
|
|
(102,891
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP Total Non-Interest Expenses
|
|
$
|
87,038
|
|
|
$
|
77,313
|
|
|
$
|
70,201
|
|
|
|
GAAP Efficiency Ratio
|
|
|
98.81
|
%
|
|
|
40.54
|
%
|
|
|
40.86
|
%
|
Effect of Impairment Loss on Goodwill
|
|
|
(53.53
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP Efficiency Ratio
|
|
|
45.28
|
%
|
|
|
40.54
|
%
|
|
|
40.86
|
%
|
|
|
Results Of
Operations
Net Interest
Income, Net Interest Spread and Net Interest Margin
Our earnings depend largely upon the difference between the
interest income received from our loan portfolio and other
interest-earning assets and the interest paid on deposits and
borrowings. The difference is net interest income.
The difference between the yield earned on interest-earning
assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities is net
interest spread. Net interest income, when expressed as a
percentage of average total interest-earning assets, is referred
to as the net interest margin.
Net interest income is affected by the change in the level and
mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities,
referred to as volume changes. Our net interest
income also is affected by changes in the yields earned on
interest-earning assets and rates paid on interest-bearing
liabilities, referred to as rate changes. Interest
rates charged on loans are affected principally by the demand
for such loans, the supply of money available for lending
purposes and competitive factors. Those factors are, in turn,
affected by general economic conditions and other factors beyond
our control, such as Federal economic policies, the general
supply of money in the economy, income tax policies,
governmental budgetary matters and the actions of the FRB.
25
The following table shows the average balances of assets,
liabilities and stockholders equity; the amount of
interest income and interest expense; the average yield or rate
for each category of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities; and the net interest spread and
the net interest margin for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Income/
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Income/
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Income/
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Earning Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Loans,
Net(1)
|
|
$
|
3,080,544
|
|
|
$
|
261,992
|
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,747,922
|
|
|
$
|
239,075
|
|
|
|
8.70
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,382,230
|
|
|
$
|
180,845
|
|
|
|
7.59
|
%
|
Municipal
Securities(2)
|
|
|
71,937
|
|
|
|
3,055
|
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
|
|
72,694
|
|
|
|
3,087
|
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
|
|
74,166
|
|
|
|
3,122
|
|
|
|
4.21
|
%
|
Obligations of Other U.S. Government Agencies
|
|
|
116,701
|
|
|
|
4,963
|
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
|
|
122,503
|
|
|
|
5,148
|
|
|
|
4.20
|
%
|
|
|
102,703
|
|
|
|
4,002
|
|
|
|
3.90
|
%
|
Other Debt Securities
|
|
|
179,506
|
|
|
|
8,436
|
|
|
|
4.70
|
%
|
|
|
219,475
|
|
|
|
10,120
|
|
|
|
4.61
|
%
|
|
|
241,881
|
|
|
|
10,271
|
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
Equity Securities
|
|
|
26,228
|
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
|
|
5.39
|
%
|
|
|
24,684
|
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
|
|
5.49
|
%
|
|
|
23,571
|
|
|
|
1,107
|
|
|
|
4.70
|
%
|
Federal Funds Sold
|
|
|
19,746
|
|
|
|
1,032
|
|
|
|
5.23
|
%
|
|
|
27,410
|
|
|
|
1,402
|
|
|
|
5.11
|
%
|
|
|
46,799
|
|
|
|
1,589
|
|
|
|
3.40
|
%
|
Term Federal Funds Sold
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5.21
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4.88
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Earning Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4.04
|
%
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2.34
|
%
|
Total Interest-Earning Assets
|
|
|
3,494,758
|
|
|
|
280,896
|
|
|
|
8.04
|
%
|
|
|
3,214,761
|
|
|
|
260,189
|
|
|
|
8.09
|
%
|
|
|
2,871,564
|
|
|
|
200,941
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
|
|
Noninterest-Earning Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
92,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
|
(30,769
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,693
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,791
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
326,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Noninterest-Earning Assets
|
|
|
388,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
377,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
3,882,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,602,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,249,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings
|
|
$
|
97,173
|
|
|
|
2,004
|
|
|
|
2.06
|
%
|
|
$
|
107,811
|
|
|
|
1,853
|
|
|
|
1.72
|
%
|
|
$
|
138,167
|
|
|
|
2,130
|
|
|
|
1.54
|
%
|
Money Market Checking and NOW Accounts
|
|
|
452,825
|
|
|
|
15,446
|
|
|
|
3.41
|
%
|
|
|
471,780
|
|
|
|
14,539
|
|
|
|
3.08
|
%
|
|
|
539,678
|
|
|
|
12,964
|
|
|
|
2.40
|
%
|
Time Deposits of $100,000 or More
|
|
|
1,430,603
|
|
|
|
75,516
|
|
|
|
5.28
|
%
|
|
|
1,286,202
|
|
|
|
64,184
|
|
|
|
4.99
|
%
|
|
|
959,904
|
|
|
|
31,984
|
|
|
|
3.33
|
%
|
Other Time Deposits
|
|
|
306,876
|
|
|
|
15,134
|
|
|
|
4.93
|
%
|
|
|
280,249
|
|
|
|
12,460
|
|
|
|
4.45
|
%
|
|
|
242,996
|
|
|
|
7,114
|
|
|
|
2.93
|
%
|
FHLB Advances and Other Borrowings
|
|
|
273,413
|
|
|
|
13,949
|
|
|
|
5.10
|
%
|
|
|
138,941
|
|
|
|
6,977
|
|
|
|
5.02
|
%
|
|
|
83,076
|
|
|
|
3,017
|
|
|
|
3.63
|
%
|
Junior Subordinated Debentures
|
|
|
82,406
|
|
|
|
6,644
|
|
|
|
8.06
|
%
|
|
|
82,406
|
|
|
|
6,416
|
|
|
|
7.79
|
%
|
|
|
82,406
|
|
|
|
4,902
|
|
|
|
5.95
|
%
|
|
|
Total Interest-Bearing Liabilities
|
|
|
2,643,296
|
|
|
|
128,693
|
|
|
|
4.87
|
%
|
|
|
2,367,389
|
|
|
|
106,429
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
|
|
2,046,227
|
|
|
|
62,111
|
|
|
|
3.04
|
%
|
|
|
Noninterest-Bearing Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand Deposits
|
|
|
702,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
735,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
751,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
44,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Noninterest-Bearing Liabilities
|
|
|
746,958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
776,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
785,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
3,390,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,143,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,831,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
492,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
458,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
417,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
$
|
3,882,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,602,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,249,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
152,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
153,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
138,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest
Spread(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.17
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.59
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.96
|
%
|
|
|
Net Interest
Margin(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.36
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.78
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.83
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Loans are net of deferred fees and related direct costs. Loan
fees have been included in the calculation of interest income.
Loan fees were $2.7 million, $4.8 million and
$6.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively. |
|
(2)
|
|
Tax-exempt
income, computed on a tax-equivalent basis using an effective
marginal rate of 35 percent, was $4.7 million,
$4.7 million and $4.8 million for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Yields on
tax-exempt income were 6.53 percent, 6.53 percent and
6.48 percent for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively. |
|
(3)
|
|
Represents
the average yield earned on interest-earning assets less the
average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(4)
|
|
Represents
net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning
assets. |
26
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the
dollar amount of changes in interest earned and paid for
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the
amount of change attributable to changes in average daily
balances (volume) or changes in average daily interest rates
(rate). The variances attributable to both the volume and rate
changes have been allocated to volume and rate changes in
proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amount of
the changes in each.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 vs.
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 vs.
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Loans, Net
|
|
$
|
28,391
|
|
|
$
|
(5,474
|
)
|
|
$
|
22,917
|
|
|
$
|
29,839
|
|
|
$
|
28,391
|
|
|
$
|
58,230
|
|
Municipal Securities
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
Obligations of Other U.S. Government Agencies
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
816
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
1,146
|
|
Other Debt Securities
|
|
|
(1,875
|
)
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
(1,684
|
)
|
|
|
(994
|
)
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
Equity Securities
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
Federal Funds Sold
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
|
|
(807
|
)
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
Term Federal Funds Sold
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Interest-Earning Deposits
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
Total Interest Income
|
|
|
25,923
|
|
|
|
(5,216
|
)
|
|
|
20,707
|
|
|
|
28,837
|
|
|
|
30,411
|
|
|
|
59,248
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
(503
|
)
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
Money Market Checking and NOW Accounts
|
|
|
(601
|
)
|
|
|
1,508
|
|
|
|
907
|
|
|
|
(1,773
|
)
|
|
|
3,348
|
|
|
|
1,575
|
|
Time Deposits of $100,000 or More
|
|
|
7,481
|
|
|
|
3,851
|
|
|
|
11,332
|
|
|
|
13,068
|
|
|
|
19,132
|
|
|
|
32,200
|
|
Other Time Deposits
|
|
|
1,244
|
|
|
|
1,430
|
|
|
|
2,674
|
|
|
|
1,220
|
|
|
|
4,126
|
|
|
|
5,346
|
|
FHLB Advances and Other Borrowings
|
|
|
6,860
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
6,972
|
|
|
|
2,524
|
|
|
|
1,436
|
|
|
|
3,960
|
|
Junior Subordinated Debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,514
|
|
|
|
1,514
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Expense
|
|
|
14,788
|
|
|
|
7,476
|
|
|
|
22,264
|
|
|
|
14,536
|
|
|
|
29,782
|
|
|
|
44,318
|
|
|
|
Change in Net Interest Income
|
|
$
|
11,135
|
|
|
$
|
(12,692
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,557
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,301
|
|
|
$
|
629
|
|
|
$
|
14,930
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, net
interest income was $152.2 million and $153.8 million,
respectively. The net interest spread and net interest margin
for the year ended December 31, 2007 were 3.17 percent
and 4.36 percent, respectively, compared to
3.59 percent and 4.78 percent, respectively, for the
year ended December 31, 2006 and 3.96 percent and
4.83 percent, respectively, for the year ended
December 31, 2005.
Average loans were $3.08 billion in 2007, as compared with
$2.75 billion in 2006 and $2.38 billion in 2005,
representing increases of 12.1 percent and
15.4 percent in 2007 and 2006, respectively. Average
interest-earning assets were $3.49 billion in 2007, as
compared with $3.21 billion in 2006 and $2.87 billion
in 2005, representing increases of 8.7 percent and
12.0 percent in 2007 and 2006, respectively. In 2007, the
majority of interest-earning assets growth was funded by a
$108.4 million increase in average total deposits and a
$134.5 million increase in FHLB advances and other
borrowings. In 2006, the growth was funded primarily by a
$249.2 million increase in average total deposits and a
$55.9 million increase in FHLB advances and other
borrowings. Total average interest-bearing liabilities grew by
$275.9 million and $321.2 million, respectively, in
2007 and 2006.
The average yield on interest-earning assets slightly decreased
to 8.04 percent in 2007, after a 109 basis point
increase in 2006 to 8.09 percent from 7.00 percent in
2005. The strong competition for deposits in our local markets
accelerated our average cost on interest-bearing liabilities to
4.87 percent in 2007, compared to 4.50 percent in 2006
and 3.04 percent in 2005, despite the FRB lowering rates by
100 basis points since September 2007. As a result,
interest income grew 8.0 percent to $280.9 million for
2007, but was outpaced by a 20.9 percent increase in
interest expense to $128.7 million. In 2006, interest
income increased by
27
29.5 percent to $260.2 million from
$200.9 million in 2005, but was outpaced by a
71.4 percent increase in interest expense to
$106.4 million in 2006 from $62.1 million in 2005.
Our net interest income in 2007 was slightly lower at
$152.2 million, compared to $153.8 million in 2006, as
the modest growth in average interest-earning assets was offset
by the FRBs lowering of rates. In 2006, net interest
income increased by 10.8 percent to $153.8 million
from $138.8 million in 2005, due primarily to a
12.0 percent increase in average interest-earning assets.
Provision
for Credit Losses
For the year ended December 31, 2007, the provision for
credit losses was $38.3 million, compared to
$7.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. The
allowance for loan losses was 1.33 percent and
0.96 percent of total gross loans at December 31, 2007
and 2006, respectively. The increase in the provision for credit
losses is attributable to increases in the loan portfolio, net
charge-offs, non-performing loans and criticized and classified
loans. The loan portfolio increased $403.7 million, or
14.2 percent, from $2,837.4 million at
December 31, 2006 to $3,241.1 million at
December 31, 2007. Net charge-offs increased
$18.1 million, or 394.3 percent, from
$4.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 to
$22.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Non-performing loans increased from $14.2 million, or
0.50 percent of total gross loans, as of December 31,
2006 to $54.5 million, or 1.66 percent of total gross
loans, as of December 31, 2007. The $403.7 million, or
14.2 percent, increase in the loan portfolio and the
$40.3 million, or 283.3 percent, increase in
non-performing loans required the provision to increase to
$38.3 million in 2007 from $7.2 million in 2006 to
maintain the necessary allowance level.
For the year ended December 31, 2006, the provision for
credit losses was $7.2 million, compared to
$5.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, an
increase of 33.0 percent. The allowance for loan losses was
0.96 percent and 1.00 percent of total gross loans at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, with the increase
in the dollar amount allowed for credit losses due to an
increase in loan volume. This was primarily due to the overall
decrease in historical loss factors on pass grade loans, while
non-performing loans increased from $10.1 million, or
0.41 percent of total gross loans, as of December 31,
2005 to $14.2 million, or 0.50 percent of total gross
loans, as of December 31, 2006. The $368.3 million, or
14.9 percent, increase in the loan portfolio and the
$4.1 million, or 40.3 percent, increase in
non-performing loans required the provision to increase to
$7.2 million in 2006 from $5.4 million in 2005 to
maintain the necessary allowance level.
Non-Interest
Income
The following table sets forth the various components of
non-interest income for the years indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts
|
|
$
|
18,061
|
|
|
$
|
17,134
|
|
|
$
|
15,782
|
|
Insurance Commissions
|
|
|
4,954
|
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
651
|
|
Trade Finance Fees
|
|
|
4,493
|
|
|
|
4,567
|
|
|
|
4,269
|
|
Remittance Fees
|
|
|
2,049
|
|
|
|
2,056
|
|
|
|
2,122
|
|
Other Service Charges and Fees
|
|
|
2,527
|
|
|
|
2,359
|
|
|
|
2,496
|
|
Bank-Owned Life Insurance Income
|
|
|
933
|
|
|
|
879
|
|
|
|
845
|
|
Increase in Fair Value of Derivatives
|
|
|
683
|
|
|
|
1,074
|
|
|
|
1,105
|
|
Other Income
|
|
|
1,702
|
|
|
|
1,157
|
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
Gain on Sales of Loans
|
|
|
5,452
|
|
|
|
6,917
|
|
|
|
3,021
|
|
Gain on Sales of Other Real Estate Owned
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on Sales of Securities Available for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Other-Than-Temporary
Impairment Loss on Securities
|
|
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Interest Income
|
|
$
|
40,006
|
|
|
$
|
36,963
|
|
|
$
|
31,450
|
|
|
|
We earn non-interest income from four major sources: service
charges on deposit accounts, insurance commissions, fees
generated from international trade finance and gain on sales of
loans. For the year ended December 31, 2007, non-interest
income was $40.0 million, an increase of 8.2 percent
from $37.0 million for the year ended December 31,
2006. The overall increase in non-interest income for 2007 is
primarily due to expansion in the Banks loan and deposit
portfolios and higher insurance commissions due to the
acquisition of two insurance agencies in January 2007, partially
offset by lower gain on sales of loans and an
other-than-temporary
impairment loss on securities. For the year ended
December 31, 2006, non-interest income was
$37.0 million, an increase of 17.5 percent from
$31.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.
The overall increase in non-interest income for 2006 is
primarily due to expansion in the Banks loan and deposit
portfolios.
Service charges on deposit accounts increased $927,000, or
5.4 percent, in 2007 compared to 2006 and increased
$1.4 million, or 8.6 percent, in 2006 compared to
2005. Service charge income on deposit accounts increased in
2007 and 2006 due to an increase in the number of accounts and
an increase in demand deposit transaction volume. Average demand
deposits decreased by 4.5 percent to $702.3 million in
2007 from $735.4 million in 2006 and decreased by
2.1 percent to $735.4 million in 2006 from
$751.5 million in 2005.
Insurance commissions increased $4.2 million, or
543.4 percent, in 2007 compared to 2006 and increased
$119,000, or 18.3 percent, in 2006 compared to 2005.
Insurance commissions
28
increased in 2007 due to the acquisition of two insurance
agencies in January 2007.
Fees generated from international trade finance decreased by
1.6 percent from $4.6 million in 2006 to
$4.5 million in 2007 and increased by 7.0 percent from
$4.3 million in 2005 to $4.6 million in 2006. The
decrease in 2007 is attributable primarily to decreased export
letter of credit volume. The increase in 2006 is attributable
primarily to increased export letter of credit volume and fee
increases. Trade finance fees relate primarily to import and
export letters of credit.
The changes in the fair value of derivatives are caused
primarily by movements in the indexes to which interest rates on
certain certificates of deposit are tied. In 2005, the Bank
offered certificates of deposit tied to either the
Standard & Poors 500 Index or a basket of Asian
currencies. The Bank entered into swap transactions to hedge the
market risk associated with such certificates of deposit. The
swaps and the related derivatives embedded in the certificates
of deposit are accounted for at fair value. The increases in the
fair value of the swaps of $683,000, $1.1 million and
$1.1 million recorded in non-interest income in 2007, 2006
and 2005, respectively, are partially offset by changes in the
fair value of the embedded derivatives recorded in non-interest
expenses.
Gain on sales of loans was $5.5 million in 2007, compared
to $6.9 million in 2006 and $3.0 million in 2005,
representing a decrease of 21.2 percent for the year ended
December 31, 2007 and an increase of 129.0 percent for
the year ended December 31, 2006. In 2007, the decrease in
gain on sales of loans resulted from lower premiums, which
decreased to 4.3 percent in 2007 compared to
5.3 percent in 2006. In 2006, the increase in gain on sales
of loans resulted from increased sales activity in SBA loans,
which was primarily due to increased loan production and sales
efforts, including the sale of some of the unguaranteed portions
of SBA loans. Generally, the guaranteed portion of a substantial
percentage of SBA loans is sold in the secondary markets, and
servicing rights are retained. During 2007, there were
$116.6 million of SBA loans sold, compared to
$110.7 million in 2006 and $50.6 million in 2005.
We periodically evaluate our investments for
other-than-temporary
impairment. We have investments in Community Reinvestment Act
(CRA) preferred securities with an aggregate par
value of $2.0 million as of December 31, 2007 and
2006. During the fourth quarter of 2007, based on an evaluation
of the length of time and extent to which the estimated fair
value of the CRA preferred securities had been less than their
carrying value, and the financial condition and near-term
prospects of the issuers, we recorded an
other-than-temporary
impairment charge of $1.1 million to write down the value
of the CRA preferred securities to their estimated fair value.
Non-Interest
Expenses
The following table sets forth the breakdown of non-interest
expenses for the years indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and Employee Benefits
|
|
$
|
47,036
|
|
|
$
|
40,512
|
|
|
$
|
36,839
|
|
Occupancy and Equipment
|
|
|
10,494
|
|
|
|
9,643
|
|
|
|
9,413
|
|
Data Processing
|
|
|
6,390
|
|
|
|
5,857
|
|
|
|
4,844
|
|
Advertising and Promotion
|
|
|
3,630
|
|
|
|
2,997
|
|
|
|
2,913
|
|
Supplies and Communications
|
|
|
2,592
|
|
|
|
2,391
|
|
|
|
2,556
|
|
Professional Fees
|
|
|
2,468
|
|
|
|
1,910
|
|
|
|
2,201
|
|
Amortization of Other Intangible Assets
|
|
|
2,324
|
|
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
Decrease in Fair Value of Embedded Option
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
Other Operating Expenses
|
|
|
11,871
|
|
|
|
11,042
|
|
|
|
8,411
|
|
Merger-Related Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(509
|
)
|
Impairment Loss on Goodwill
|
|
|
102,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Interest Expenses
|
|
$
|
189,929
|
|
|
$
|
77,313
|
|
|
$
|
70,201
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2007, non-interest expenses
were $189.9 million, an increase of $112.6 million, or
145.7 percent, from $77.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006. The increase in 2007 was primarily the
result of an impairment loss on goodwill of $102.9 million.
The remaining increase in 2007 was due to increases in
compensation, occupancy and equipment expenses, and other
operating expenses, as well as non-interest expenses of
$3.6 million attributable to Chun-Ha and All World and
$1.3 million attributable to the two new branches that
opened during 2007. For the year ended December 31, 2006,
non-interest expenses were $77.3 million, an increase of
$7.1 million, or 10.1 percent, from $70.2 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005. The increase in 2006
was primarily the result of higher compensation.
Salaries and employee benefits expenses for 2007 increased
$6.5 million, or 16.1 percent, to $47.0 million
from $40.5 million for 2006. Salaries and employee benefits
expenses for 2006 increased $3.7 million, or
10.0 percent, to $40.5 million from $36.8 million
for 2005. The increase in 2007 was due to $2.4 million
attributable to Chun-Ha and All World, $1.7 million of
separation expenses for our former Chief Executive
Officers retirement, $521,000 attributable to the two new
branches that opened during 2007, $370,000 of additional
share-based compensation reflecting stock options granted,
annual salary increases and an increase in the
29
average number of employees. Average headcount was 623, 589 and
535 in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, representing increases
of 5.8 percent, 10.1 percent and 6.4 percent,
respectively, over the prior years. The increase in 2006 was due
primarily to annual salary increases, additional share-based
compensation reflecting stock options granted and an increase in
the average number of employees.
Occupancy and equipment expenses for 2007 increased $851,000, or
8.8 percent, to $10.5 million from $9.6 million
for 2006. Occupancy and equipment expenses for 2006 increased
$230,000, or 2.4 percent, to $9.6 million from
$9.4 million for 2005. The increase in 2007 was due to
$476,000 attributable to the two new branches that opened during
2007, $194,000 attributable to Chun-Ha and All World, and
additional office space leased. The increase in 2006 was due to
additional office space leased.
Other operating expenses were $11.9 million for 2007,
compared to $11.0 million for 2006, representing an
increase of $829,000, or 7.5 percent. The increase is
primarily attributable to an increase in the amortization of
loan servicing assets. Other operating expenses were
$11.0 million for 2006, compared to $8.4 million for
2005, representing an increase of $2.6 million, or
31.3 percent. The increase is primarily attributable to a
$534,000 operating loss related to an international trade
transaction, amortization expense of $879,000 related to the
termination in the fourth quarter of 2005 of interest rate swaps
that had unrealized losses aggregating $2.1 million, and a
$355,000 impairment charge to adjust the loan servicing asset to
fair value.
During our annual assessment of goodwill during the fourth
quarter of 2007, we concluded that we had an impairment of
goodwill based on the decline in the market value of our common
stock, which we believe reflects, in part, recent turmoil in the
financial markets that has adversely affected the market value
of the common stock of many banks. The fair value was determined
based on a weighted distribution of values derived from three
different approaches: market approach, market capitalization
approach, and income approach. Based on this assessment, we
concluded that $102.9 million of the related goodwill was
impaired and was required to be expensed as a non-cash charge to
continuing operations during the fourth quarter of 2007. As of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, goodwill was
$107.1 million and $207.6 million, respectively, which
resulted primarily from the acquisition of PUB in 2004.
Income Taxes
For the year ended December 31, 2007, income taxes of
$24.5 million were recognized on pre-tax losses of
$36.0 million, representing an effective tax rate of 67.9
percent, compared to income taxes of $40.6 million
recognized on pre-tax income of $106.2 million,
representing an effective tax rate of 38.2 percent, for
2006, and income taxes of $36.5 million recognized on
pre-tax income of $94.7 million, representing an effective
tax rate of 38.5 percent, for 2005. The effective tax rate
for 2007 includes a $102.9 million impairment loss on
goodwill, which is not deductible for tax purposes.
During 2007, we made investments in various tax credit funds
totaling $5.8 million and recognized $775,000 of income tax
credits earned from qualified low-income housing investments. We
recognized an income tax credit of $659,000 for the tax year
2006 from $4.8 million in such investments and recognized
an income tax credit of $673,000 for the tax year 2005 from
$5.9 million in such investments. We intend to continue to
make such investments as part of an effort to lower the
effective tax rate and to meet our community reinvestment
obligations under the CRA.
As indicated in Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements, Note 11 Income Taxes,
income taxes are the sum of two components: current tax
expense and deferred tax expense (benefit). Current tax expense
is the result of applying the current tax rate to taxable
income. The deferred portion is intended to account for the fact
that income on which taxes are paid differs from financial
statement pretax income because certain items of income and
expense are recognized in different years for income tax
purposes than in the financial statements. These differences in
the years that income and expenses are recognized cause
temporary differences.
Most of our temporary differences involve recognizing more
expenses in our financial statements than we have been allowed
to deduct for taxes, and therefore we normally have a net
deferred tax asset. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, we had
net deferred tax assets of $18.5 million and
$13.1 million, respectively.
Financial
Condition
Loan
Portfolio
Total gross loans increased by $419.1 million, or
14.6 percent, in 2007. Total gross loans represented
82.5 percent of total assets at December 31, 2007,
compared with 77.0 percent and 73.2 percent at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Commercial and industrial loans were $2,094.7 million and
$1,726.4 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively,
30
representing 63.7 percent and 60.2 percent,
respectively, of the total loan portfolio. Commercial loans
include term loans and revolving lines of credit. Term loans
typically have a maturity of three to five years and are
extended to finance the purchase of business entities,
owner-occupied commercial property, business equipment,
leasehold improvements or for permanent working capital. SBA
guaranteed loans usually have a longer maturity (five to twenty
years). Lines of credit, in general, are extended on an annual
basis to businesses that need temporary working capital
and/or
import/export financing. These borrowers are well diversified as
to industry, location and their current and target markets.
Real estate loans were $1,101.9 million and
$1,041.4 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, representing 33.5 percent and
36.3 percent, respectively, of the total loan portfolio.
Real estate loans are extended to finance the purchase
and/or
improvement of commercial real estate and residential property.
The properties generally are investor-owned, but may be for
user-owned purposes. Underwriting guidelines include, among
other things, an appraisal in conformity with the USPAP,
limitations on
loan-to-value
ratios, and minimum cash flow requirements to service debt. The
majority of the properties taken as collateral are located in
Southern California.
The following table sets forth the amount of total loans
outstanding in each category as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
Loans Outstanding as of December 31,
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Property
|
|
$
|
795,675
|
|
|
$
|
757,428
|
|
|
$
|
733,650
|
|
|
$
|
783,539
|
|
|
$
|
397,853
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
215,857
|
|
|
|
202,207
|
|
|
|
152,080
|
|
|
|
92,521
|
|
|
|
43,047
|
|
Residential
Property(1)
|
|
|
90,375
|
|
|
|
81,758
|
|
|
|
88,442
|
|
|
|
80,786
|
|
|
|
58,477
|
|
|
|
Total Real Estate Loans
|
|
|
1,101,907
|
|
|
|
1,041,393
|
|
|
|
974,172
|
|
|
|
956,846
|
|
|
|
499,377
|
|
|
|
Commercial and Industrial Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Term Loans
|
|
|
1,599,853
|
|
|
|
1,202,612
|
|
|
|
945,210
|
|
|
|
754,108
|
|
|
|
433,398
|
|
Commercial Lines of Credit
|
|
|
256,978
|
|
|
|
225,630
|
|
|
|
224,271
|
|
|
|
201,940
|
|
|
|
120,856
|
|
International Loans
|
|
|
119,360
|
|
|
|
126,561
|
|
|
|
106,520
|
|
|
|
95,936
|
|
|
|
65,040
|
|
SBA
Loans(2)
|
|
|
118,528
|
|
|
|
171,631
|
|
|
|
155,491
|
|
|
|
166,285
|
|
|
|
91,717
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial and Industrial Loans
|
|
|
2,094,719
|
|
|
|
1,726,434
|
|
|
|
1,431,492
|
|
|
|
1,218,269
|
|
|
|
711,011
|
|
|
|
Consumer
Loans(3)
|
|
|
90,449
|
|
|
|
100,121
|
|
|
|
92,154
|
|
|
|
87,526
|
|
|
|
54,878
|
|
|
|
Total Gross Loans
|
|
$
|
3,287,075
|
|
|
$
|
2,867,948
|
|
|
$
|
2,497,818
|
|
|
$
|
2,262,641
|
|
|
$
|
1,265,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003, loans
held for sale totaling $310,000, $630,000, $0, $0 and $0,
respectively, were included at the lower of cost or fair
value. |
|
(2)
|
|
As
of December 31, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003, loans held
for sale totaling $6.0 million, $23.2 million, $0,
$3.9 million and $25.5 million, respectively, were
included at the lower of cost or market. |
|
(3)
|
|
Consumer
loans includes HELOCs. |
31
The following table sets forth the percentage distribution of
loans in each category as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
Distribution of Loans as of December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Property
|
|
|
24.2
|
%
|
|
|
26.4
|
%
|
|
|
29.4
|
%
|
|
|
34.6
|
%
|
|
|
31.4
|
%
|
Construction
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
Residential Property
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
Total Real Estate Loans
|
|
|
33.5
|
%
|
|
|
36.3
|
%
|
|
|
39.0
|
%
|
|
|
42.3
|
%
|
|
|
39.5
|
%
|
|
|
Commercial and Industrial Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Term Loans
|
|
|
48.7
|
%
|
|
|
41.9
|
%
|
|
|
37.8
|
%
|
|
|
33.3
|
%
|
|
|
34.3
|
%
|
Commercial Lines of Credit
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
International Loans
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
SBA Loans
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
|
Total Commercial and Industrial Loans
|
|
|
63.7
|
%
|
|
|
60.2
|
%
|
|
|
57.3
|
%
|
|
|
53.8
|
%
|
|
|
56.2
|
%
|
|
|
Consumer Loans
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
Total Gross Loans
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
The following table shows the distribution of undisbursed loan
commitments as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to Extend Credit
|
|
$
|
524,349
|
|
|
$
|
578,347
|
|
Commercial Letters of Credit
|
|
|
52,544
|
|
|
|
65,158
|
|
Standby Letters of Credit
|
|
|
48,071
|
|
|
|
48,289
|
|
Unused Credit Card Lines
|
|
|
18,622
|
|
|
|
17,031
|
|
|
|
Total Undisbursed Loan Commitments
|
|
$
|
643,586
|
|
|
$
|
708,825
|
|
|
|
32
The table below shows the maturity distribution and repricing
intervals of outstanding loans as of December 31, 2007. In
addition, the table shows the distribution of such loans between
those with floating or variable interest rates and those with
fixed or predetermined interest rates. The table includes
non-accrual loans of $54.3 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
One
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
But
Within
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
One
Year
|
|
|
Five
Years
|
|
|
Five
Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Property
|
|
$
|
390,407
|
|
|
$
|
245,020
|
|
|
$
|
160,248
|
|
|
$
|
795,675
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
215,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215,857
|
|
Residential Property
|
|
|
22,881
|
|
|
|
40,656
|
|
|
|
26,838
|
|
|
|
90,375
|
|
|
|
Total Real Estate Loans
|
|
|
629,145
|
|
|
|
285,676
|
|
|
|
187,086
|
|
|
|
1,101,907
|
|
|
|
Commercial and Industrial Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Term Loans
|
|
|
875,340
|
|
|
|
325,428
|
|
|
|
399,085
|
|
|
|
1,599,853
|
|
Commercial Lines of Credit
|
|
|
256,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256,978
|
|
International Loans
|
|
|
119,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,360
|
|
SBA Loans
|
|
|
108,413
|
|
|
|
1,338
|
|
|
|
8,777
|
|
|
|
118,528
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial and Industrial Loans
|
|
|
1,360,091
|
|
|
|
326,766
|
|
|
|
407,862
|
|
|
|
2,094,719
|
|
|
|
Consumer Loans
|
|
|
61,538
|
|
|
|
28,862
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
90,449
|
|
|
|
Total Gross Loans
|
|
$
|
2,050,774
|
|
|
$
|
641,304
|
|
|
$
|
594,997
|
|
|
$
|
3,287,075
|
|
|
|
Loans With Predetermined Interest Rates
|
|
$
|
117,175
|
|
|
$
|
619,110
|
|
|
$
|
590,680
|
|
|
$
|
1,326,965
|
|
Loans With Variable Interest Rates
|
|
$
|
1,933,599
|
|
|
$
|
22,194
|
|
|
$
|
4,317
|
|
|
$
|
1,960,110
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, there were $389.7 million of
loans, or 11.9 percent of total gross loans, to borrowers
who were involved in the accommodation/hospitality industry, and
$336.9 million of loans, or 10.2 percent of total
gross loans, to borrowers operating gasoline stations. There was
no other concentration of loans to any one type of industry
exceeding ten percent of total gross loans outstanding.
Non-Performing
Assets
Non-performing assets consist of loans on non-accrual status,
loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest,
loans restructured where the terms of repayment have been
renegotiated resulting in a reduction or deferral of interest or
principal, and other real estate owned (OREO). Loans
are generally placed on non-accrual status when they become
90 days past due unless management believes the loan is
adequately collateralized and in the process of collection.
Loans may be restructured by management when a borrower has
experienced some change in financial status, causing an
inability to meet the original repayment terms, and where we
believe the borrower eventually will overcome those
circumstances and repay the loan in full. OREO consists of
properties acquired by foreclosure or similar means that
management intends to offer for sale.
Managements classification of a loan as non-accrual is an
indication that there is reasonable doubt as to the full
collectibility of principal or interest on the loan; at this
point, we stop recognizing income from the interest on the loan
and reverse any uncollected interest that had been accrued but
unpaid. These loans may or may not be collateralized, but
collection efforts are continuously pursued.
Non-performing loans were $54.5 million at
December 31, 2007, compared to $14.2 million and
$10.1 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, representing a 283.3 percent increase in 2007
and a 40.3 percent increase in 2006. Total gross loans
increased by 14.6 percent in 2007 over 2006 and
14.8 percent in 2006 over 2005. As a result, the ratio of
non-performing loans to total gross loans increased to
1.66 percent at December 31, 2007 from
0.50 percent at December 31, 2006, and increased to
0.50 percent at December 31, 2006 from
0.41 percent at December 31, 2005. As of
December 31, 2007, we had $287,000 of OREO. There was no
OREO as of December 31, 2006.
Except for non-performing loans set forth below and loans
disclosed as impaired, our management is not aware of any loans
as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 for which known credit
problems of the borrower would cause serious doubts as to the
ability of such borrowers to comply with their present loan
repayment
33
terms, or any known events that would result in the loan being
designated as non-performing at some future date. Our management
cannot, however, predict the extent to which a deterioration in
general economic conditions, real estate values, increases in
general rates of interest, or changes in the financial condition
or business of borrower may adversely affect a borrowers
ability to pay.
The following table provides information with respect to the
components of non-performing assets as of December 31 for the
years indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Performing Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Accrual Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Property
|
|
$
|
2,684
|
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
527
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
24,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Property
|
|
|
1,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
1,126
|
|
Commercial and Industrial Loans
|
|
|
25,729
|
|
|
|
13,862
|
|
|
|
9,574
|
|
|
|
5,510
|
|
|
|
6,398
|
|
Consumer Loans
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Accrual Loans
|
|
|
54,252
|
|
|
|
14,213
|
|
|
|
10,122
|
|
|
|
5,806
|
|
|
|
8,104
|
|
|
|
Loans 90 Days or More Past Due and Still Accruing (as to
Principal or Interest):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
557
|
|
Commercial and Industrial Loans
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Loans
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loans 90 Days or More Past Due and Still Accruing (as to
Principal or Interest)
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Performing Loans
|
|
|
54,479
|
|
|
|
14,215
|
|
|
|
10,131
|
|
|
|
6,014
|
|
|
|
8,661
|
|
Other Real Estate Owned
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Performing Assets
|
|
$
|
54,766
|
|
|
$
|
14,215
|
|
|
$
|
10,131
|
|
|
$
|
6,014
|
|
|
$
|
8,661
|
|
|
|
Non-Performing Loans as a Percentage of Total Gross Loans
|
|
|
1.66
|
%
|
|
|
0.50
|
%
|
|
|
0.41
|
%
|
|
|
0.27
|
%
|
|
|
0.68
|
%
|
Non-Performing Assets as a Percentage of Total Assets
|
|
|
1.37
|
%
|
|
|
0.38
|
%
|
|
|
0.30
|
%
|
|
|
0.19
|
%
|
|
|
0.48
|
%
|
Non-accrual loans at December 31, 2007 included a
$17.0 million construction loan for low-income housing that
is fully collateralized and participated in by the local
government. The downgrade of this loan relates to project cost
overruns and construction delays. Despite these setbacks, we
anticipate the project being completed and our loan being repaid
without a loss to the Bank.
Allowance for Loan
Losses and Allowance for Off-Balance Sheet Items
Provisions to the allowance for loan losses are made quarterly
to recognize probable loan losses. The quarterly provision is
based on the allowance need, which is calculated using a formula
designed to provide adequate allowances for losses inherent in
the portfolio. The formula is made up of various components. The
allowance is first determined by assigning reserve ratios for
all loans. All loans that are classified are then assigned
certain allocations according to type with larger percentages
applied to loans deemed to be of a higher risk. These
percentages are determined based on the prior loss history by
type of loan, adjusted for current economic factors.
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for Loan
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
Losses
Applicable To
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Receivable
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Receivable
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Receivable
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Receivable
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Receivable
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Property
|
|
$
|
2,269
|
|
|
$
|
795,675
|
|
|
$
|
2,101
|
|
|
$
|
757,428
|
|
|
$
|
2,043
|
|
|
$
|
733,650
|
|
|
$
|
1,854
|
|
|
$
|
783,539
|
|
|
$
|
374
|
|
|
$
|
397,853
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
3,478
|
|
|
|
215,857
|
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
|
202,207
|
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
152,080
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
92,521
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
43,047
|
|
|
|
Residential
Property(1)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
90,065
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
81,128
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
87,377
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
80,786
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
58,477
|
|
|
|
Total Real Estate Loans
|
|
|
5,779
|
|
|
|
1,101,597
|
|
|
|
2,706
|
|
|
|
1,040,763
|
|
|
|
2,537
|
|
|
|
973,107
|
|
|
|
2,358
|
|
|
|
956,846
|
|
|
|
992
|
|
|
|
499,377
|
|
Commercial and Industrial
Loans(1)
|
|
|
36,011
|
|
|
|
2,088,694
|
|
|
|
23,099
|
|
|
|
1,703,194
|
|
|
|
21,035
|
|
|
|
1,431,492
|
|
|
|
19,051
|
|
|
|
1,214,419
|
|
|
|
11,376
|
|
|
|
685,557
|
|
Consumer Loans
|
|
|
1,821
|
|
|
|
90,449
|
|
|
|
1,752
|
|
|
|
100,121
|
|
|
|
1,391
|
|
|
|
92,154
|
|
|
|
1,293
|
|
|
|
87,526
|
|
|
|
846
|
|
|
|
54,878
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
43,611
|
|
|
$
|
3,280,740
|
|
|
$
|
27,557
|
|
|
$
|
2,844,078
|
|
|
$
|
24,963
|
|
|
$
|
2,496,753
|
|
|
$
|
22,702
|
|
|
$
|
2,258,791
|
|
|
$
|
13,349
|
|
|
$
|
1,239,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Loans
held for sale excluded. |
The allowance is based on estimates, and ultimate future losses
may vary from current estimates. Underlying trends in the
economic cycle, particularly in Southern California, which
management cannot completely predict, will influence credit
quality. It is possible that future economic or other factors
will adversely affect the Banks borrowers. As a result, we
may sustain loan losses in any particular period that are
sizable in relation to the allowance, or exceed the allowance.
In addition, our asset quality may deteriorate through a number
of possible factors, including rapid growth, failure to maintain
or enforce appropriate underwriting standards, failure to
maintain an adequate number of qualified loan personnel, and
failure to identify and monitor potential problem loans.
The allowance for loan losses and allowance for off-balance
sheet items are maintained at levels that are believed to be
adequate by management to absorb estimated probable loan losses
inherent in the loan portfolio. The adequacy of the allowances
is determined through periodic evaluations of the loan portfolio
and other pertinent factors, which are inherently subjective as
the process calls for various significant estimates and
assumptions. Among other factors, the estimates involve the
amounts and timing of expected future cash flows and fair value
of collateral on impaired loans, estimated losses on loans based
on historical loss experience, various qualitative factors, and
uncertainties in estimating losses and inherent risks in the
various credit portfolios, which may be subject to substantial
change.
On a quarterly basis, we utilize a classification migration
model and individual loan review analysis tools as starting
points for determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan
losses and allowance for off-balance sheet items. Our loss
migration analysis tracks a certain number of quarters of loan
loss history to determine historical losses by classification
category (i.e., pass, special mention,
substandard and doubtful) for each loan
type, except certain loans (automobile, mortgage and credit
cards), which are analyzed as homogeneous loan pools. These
calculated loss factors are then applied to outstanding loan
balances, unused commitments and off-balance sheet exposures,
such as letters of credit. The individual loan review analysis
is the other part of the allowance allocation process, applying
specific monitoring policies and procedures in analyzing the
existing loan portfolios. Further allowance assignments are made
based on general and specific economic conditions, as well as
performance trends within specific portfolio segments and
individual concentrations of credit.
The allowance for loan losses increased by $16.1 million,
or 58.3 percent, to $43.6 million at December 31,
2007 as compared with $27.6 million at December 31,
2006. The increase in the allowance for loan losses in 2007 was
due primarily to the increased migration of loans into more
adverse risk rating categories and the increase in the overall
loan portfolio. See Provision for Credit Losses.
In addition, the allowance reflects higher estimated loss
severity arising from a softening economy, partially offset by
our better collateral coverage on impaired loans and the
presence of guarantees. The increase in the allowance for loan
losses in 2006 was due primarily to increased specific
allowances for impaired loans and an increase in the qualitative
adjustments due to changes in the qualitative factors. The ratio
of the allowance for loan losses to total gross loans
substantially improved to 1.33 percent at the end of 2007
as compared with 0.96 percent and 1.00 percent at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, primarily due to
the overall increase of historical loss factors and classified
loans.
The Bank also recorded in other liabilities an allowance for off-
35
balance sheet exposure, primarily unfunded loan commitments, of
$1.8 million and $2.1 million at December 31,
2007 and 2006, respectively. Based on managements
evaluation and analysis of portfolio credit quality and
prevailing economic conditions, we believe these reserves are
adequate for losses inherent in the loan portfolio and
off-balance sheet exposure at December 31, 2007 and 2006.
We determine the appropriate overall allowance for loan losses
and allowance for off-balance sheet items based on the analysis
described above, taking into account managements judgment.
The allowance methodology is reviewed on a periodic basis and
modified as appropriate. Based on this analysis, including the
aforementioned factors, we believe that the allowance for loan
losses and allowance for off-balance sheet items are adequate as
of December 31, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and
For The Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for Loan Losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Year
|
|
$
|
27,557
|
|
|
$
|
24,963
|
|
|
$
|
22,702
|
|
|
$
|
13,349
|
|
|
$
|
11,254
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Loan Losses from PUB Acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-Offs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
Commercial and Industrial Loans
|
|
|
22,255
|
|
|
|
5,333
|
|
|
|
4,371
|
|
|
|
5,004
|
|
|
|
3,687
|
|
Consumer Loans
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
827
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
Total Charge-Offs
|
|
|
23,330
|
|
|
|
6,129
|
|
|
|
5,198
|
|
|
|
5,485
|
|
|
|
4,423
|
|
|
|
Recoveries on Loans Previously Charged Off:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Residential Property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Commercial and Industrial Loans
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
957
|
|
|
|
2,193
|
|
|
|
1,702
|
|
|
|
859
|
|
Consumer Loans
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
Total Recoveries on Loans Previously Charged Off
|
|
|
696
|
|
|
|
1,550
|
|
|
|
2,394
|
|
|
|
1,780
|
|
|
|
1,208
|
|
|
|
Net Loan Charge-Offs
|
|
|
22,634
|
|
|
|
4,579
|
|
|
|
2,804
|
|
|
|
3,705
|
|
|
|
3,215
|
|
|
|
Provision Charged to Operating Expenses
|
|
|
38,688
|
|
|
|
7,173
|
|
|
|
5,065
|
|
|
|
2,492
|
|
|
|
5,310
|
|
|
|
Balance at
End of Year
|
|
$
|
43,611
|
|
|
$
|
27,557
|
|
|
$
|
24,963
|
|
|
$
|
22,702
|
|
|
$
|
13,349
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for Off-Balance Sheet Items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Year
|
|
$
|
2,130
|
|
|
$
|
2,130
|
|
|
$
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
1,385
|
|
|
$
|
1,015
|
|
Provision Charged to Operating Expenses
|
|
|
(365
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
Balance at
End of Year
|
|
$
|
1,765
|
|
|
$
|
2,130
|
|
|
$
|
2,130
|
|
|
$
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
1,385
|
|
|
|
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loan Charge-Offs to Average Total Gross Loans
|
|
|
0.73
|
%
|
|
|
0.17
|
%
|
|
|
0.12
|
%
|
|
|
0.19
|
%
|
|
|
0.29
|
%
|
Net Loan Charge-Offs to Total Gross Loans at End of Period
|
|
|
0.69
|
%
|
|
|
0.16
|
%
|
|
|
0.11
|
%
|
|
|
0.16
|
%
|
|
|
0.25
|
%
|
Allowance for Loan Losses to Average Total Gross Loans
|
|
|
1.41
|
%
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
|
|
1.05
|
%
|
|
|
1.17
|
%
|
|
|
1.20
|
%
|
Allowance for Loan Losses to Total Gross Loans at End of Period
|
|
|
1.33
|
%
|
|
|
0.96
|
%
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
|
|
1.06
|
%
|
Net Loan Charge-Offs to Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
|
51.90
|
%
|
|
|
16.62
|
%
|
|
|
11.23
|
%
|
|
|
16.32
|
%
|
|
|
24.08
|
%
|
Net Loan Charge-Offs to Provision Charged to Operating Expenses
|
|
|
58.50
|
%
|
|
|
63.84
|
%
|
|
|
55.36
|
%
|
|
|
148.68
|
%
|
|
|
60.55
|
%
|
Allowance for Loan Losses to Non-Performing Loans
|
|
|
80.05
|
%
|
|
|
193.86
|
%
|
|
|
246.40
|
%
|
|
|
377.55
|
%
|
|
|
154.13
|
%
|
Balances:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Total Gross Loans Outstanding During Period
|
|
$
|
3,082,671
|
|
|
$
|
2,751,565
|
|
|
$
|
2,386,575
|
|
|
$
|
1,938,422
|
|
|
$
|
1,119,860
|
|
Total Gross Loans Outstanding at End of Period
|
|
$
|
3,287,075
|
|
|
$
|
2,867,948
|
|
|
$
|
2,497,818
|
|
|
$
|
2,262,641
|
|
|
$
|
1,265,266
|
|
Non-Performing Loans at End of Period
|
|
$
|
54,479
|
|
|
$
|
14,215
|
|
|
$
|
10,131
|
|
|
$
|
6,014
|
|
|
$
|
8,661
|
|
|
|
36
Investment Portfolio
As of December 31, 2007, the investment portfolio was
composed primarily of mortgage-backed securities,
U.S. Government agency securities (Agencies),
municipal bonds, collateralized mortgage obligations and
corporate bonds.
Investment securities available for sale were 99.7 percent,
99.8 percent and 99.8 percent of the total investment
portfolio as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Most of the securities held by us carried fixed
interest rates. Other than holdings of Agencies, there were no
investments in securities of any one issuer exceeding
10 percent of stockholders equity as of
December 31, 2007, 2006 or 2005.
We maintain an investment portfolio primarily for liquidity
purposes. As of December 31, 2007, securities available for
sale were $349.5 million, or 8.8 percent of total
assets, compared to $390.6 million, or 10.5 percent of
total assets, as of December 31, 2006. In 2007 and 2006, we
purchased $45.0 million and $9.7 million,
respectively, of Agencies, corporate bonds and mortgage-backed
securities to replenish the portfolio for principal repayments
in the form of calls, prepayments and scheduled amortization and
to maintain an asset mix consistent with our strategic direction.
The following table summarizes the amortized cost, fair value
and distribution of investment securities as of the dates
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
Portfolio as of December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
Held to Maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds
|
|
$
|
694
|
|
|
$
|
694
|
|
|
$
|
693
|
|
|
$
|
693
|
|
|
$
|
692
|
|
|
$
|
692
|
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
Total
Securities Held to Maturity
|
|
$
|
940
|
|
|
$
|
941
|
|
|
$
|
967
|
|
|
$
|
969
|
|
|
$
|
1,049
|
|
|
$
|
1,051
|
|
|
|
Securities
Available for Sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government Agency Securities
|
|
$
|
104,893
|
|
|
$
|
105,089
|
|
|
$
|
119,768
|
|
|
$
|
118,244
|
|
|
$
|
129,589
|
|
|
$
|
127,813
|
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
|
|
99,332
|
|
|
|
99,198
|
|
|
|
123,614
|
|
|
|
121,608
|
|
|
|
149,311
|
|
|
|
147,268
|
|
Municipal Bonds
|
|
|
69,907
|
|
|
|
71,751
|
|
|
|
69,966
|
|
|
|
71,710
|
|
|
|
71,536
|
|
|
|
73,220
|
|
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
|
|
|
51,881
|
|
|
|
51,418
|
|
|
|
67,605
|
|
|
|
66,113
|
|
|
|
83,068
|
|
|
|
81,456
|
|
Corporate Bonds
|
|
|
18,295
|
|
|
|
18,226
|
|
|
|
8,090
|
|
|
|
7,887
|
|
|
|
8,235
|
|
|
|
8,053
|
|
Other Securities
|
|
|
3,925
|
|
|
|
3,835
|
|
|
|
4,999
|
|
|
|
5,050
|
|
|
|
4,999
|
|
|
|
5,053
|
|
|
|
Total
Securities Available for Sale
|
|
$
|
348,233
|
|
|
$
|
349,517
|
|
|
$
|
394,042
|
|
|
$
|
390,612
|
|
|
$
|
446,738
|
|
|
$
|
442,863
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the maturity
and/or
repricing schedule for investment securities and their
weighted-average yield as of December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
One
|
|
|
After
Five
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
But
Within
|
|
|
But
Within
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
One
Year
|
|
|
Five
Years
|
|
|
Ten
Years
|
|
|
Ten
Years
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government Agency Securities
|
|
$
|
61,942
|
|
|
|
4.26%
|
|
|
$
|
43,147
|
|
|
|
4.74%
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-Backed
Securities(1)
|
|
|
28,971
|
|
|
|
4.98%
|
|
|
|
36,518
|
|
|
|
4.84%
|
|
|
|
33,955
|
|
|
|
4.91%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal
Bonds(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,844
|
|
|
|
5.01%
|
|
|
|
9,757
|
|
|
|
6.26%
|
|
|
|
59,844
|
|
|
|
6.39%
|
|
Collateralized Mortgage
Obligations(1)
|
|
|
19,629
|
|
|
|
4.29%
|
|
|
|
28,772
|
|
|
|
4.31%
|
|
|
|
3,017
|
|
|
|
4.38%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,226
|
|
|
|
5.04%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Securities
|
|
|
3,835
|
|
|
|
7.12%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
114,377
|
|
|
|
4.54%
|
|
|
$
|
129,507
|
|
|
|
4.72%
|
|
|
$
|
46,729
|
|
|
|
5.16%
|
|
|
$
|
59,844
|
|
|
|
6.39%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities and collateralized mortgage obligations have
contractual maturities through 2037. The above table is based on
the expected prepayment schedule. |
|
(2)
|
|
The
yield on municipal bonds has been computed on a tax-equivalent
basis, using an effective marginal rate of
35 percent. |
37
Deposits
Total deposits at December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were
$3,001.7 million, $2,944.7 million and
$2,826.1 million, respectively, representing an increase of
$57.0 million, or 1.9 percent, in 2007 and
$118.6 million, or 4.2 percent, in 2006. At
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, total time deposits
outstanding were $1,782.5 million, $1,678.8 million
and $1,439.8 million, respectively, representing
59.4 percent, 57.0 percent and 50.9 percent,
respectively, of total deposits. This growth reflects the shift
away from low-yielding accounts that normally occurs as interest
rates rise and depositors take advantage of the greater interest
rate differentials available in the market.
Demand deposits and money market accounts decreased by
$40.5 million, or 3.5 percent, in 2007 and
$98.2 million, or 7.8 percent, in 2006. Core deposits
(defined as demand, money market and savings deposits) decreased
by $46.7 million, or 3.7 percent, to
$1,219.7 million as of December 31, 2007 from
$1,265.9 million as of December 31, 2006, as
depositors shifted funds into higher yielding certificates of
deposit. At December 31, 2007, noninterest-bearing demand
deposits represented 22.7 percent of total deposits
compared to 24.7 percent at December 31, 2006.
Average deposits for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006 and 2005 were $2,989.8 million, $2,881.4 million
and $2,632.3 million, respectively. Average deposits grew
by 3.8 percent in 2007 and 9.5 percent in 2006.
We accept brokered deposits on a selective basis at prudent
interest rates to augment deposit growth. There were
$31.8 million and $3.3 million of brokered deposits as
of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. We also had
$200.0 million of state time deposits over $100,000 with a
weighted-average interest rate of 3.62 percent and
5.16 percent as of December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
The table below summarizes the distribution of average deposits
and the average rates paid for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
|
Demand, Noninterest-Bearing
|
|
$
|
702,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
735,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
751,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
97,173
|
|
|
|
2.06%
|
|
|
|
107,811
|
|
|
|
1.72%
|
|
|
|
138,167
|
|
|
|
1.54%
|
|
Money Market Checking and NOW Accounts
|
|
|
452,825
|
|
|
|
3.41%
|
|
|
|
471,780
|
|
|
|
3.08%
|
|
|
|
539,678
|
|
|
|
2.40%
|
|
Time Deposits of $100,000 or More
|
|
|
1,430,603
|
|
|
|
5.28%
|
|
|
|
1,286,202
|
|
|
|
4.99%
|
|
|
|
959,904
|
|
|
|
3.33%
|
|
Other Time Deposits
|
|
|
306,876
|
|
|
|
4.93%
|
|
|
|
280,249
|
|
|
|
4.45%
|
|
|
|
242,996
|
|
|
|
2.93%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Deposits
|
|
$
|
2,989,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,881,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,632,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below summarizes the maturity of time deposits of
$100,000 or more at December 31 for the years indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months or Less
|
|
$
|
958,917
|
|
|
$
|
689,309
|
|
|
$
|
587,251
|
|
Over Three Months Through Six Months
|
|
|
289,293
|
|
|
|
414,687
|
|
|
|
248,338
|
|
Over Six Months Through Twelve Months
|
|
|
188,890
|
|
|
|
274,402
|
|
|
|
321,714
|
|
Over Twelve Months
|
|
|
4,583
|
|
|
|
4,960
|
|
|
|
4,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,441,683
|
|
|
$
|
1,383,358
|
|
|
$
|
1,161,950
|
|
|
|
38
FHLB
Advances and Other Borrowings
FHLB advances and other borrowings mostly take the form of
advances from the FHLB of San Francisco and overnight
Federal funds.
At December 31, 2007, advances from the FHLB were
$432.7 million, an increase of $264.6 million, or
157.4 percent, from the December 31, 2006 balance of
$168.1 million. During 2007 and 2006, advances from the
FHLB were utilized to fund loans due to favorable rates.
Junior
Subordinated Debentures
During the first half of 2004, we issued two junior subordinated
notes bearing interest at the three-month London InterBank
Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 2.90 percent totaling
$61.8 million and one junior subordinated note bearing
interest at the three-month LIBOR plus 2.63 percent
totaling $20.6 million. The outstanding subordinated
debentures related to these offerings, the proceeds of which
were used to finance the purchase of PUB, totaled
$82.4 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006.
Interest
Rate Risk Management
Interest rate risk indicates our exposure to market interest
rate fluctuations. The movement of interest rates directly and
inversely affects the economic value of fixed-income assets,
which is the present value of future cash flow discounted by the
current interest rate; under the same conditions, the higher the
current interest rate, the higher the denominator of
discounting. Interest rate risk management is intended to
decrease or increase the level of our exposure to market
interest rates. The level of interest rate risk can be managed
through such means as the changing of gap positions and the
volume of fixed-income assets. For successful management of
interest rate risk, we use various methods to measure existing
and future interest rate risk exposures, giving effect to
historical attrition rates of core deposits. In addition to
regular reports used in business operations, repricing gap
analysis, stress testing and simulation modeling are the main
measurement techniques used to quantify interest rate risk
exposure.
39
The following table shows the status of our gap position as of
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
After
One
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Than
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Year
But
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
But
Within
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
Interest-
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Months
|
|
|
One
Year
|
|
|
Five
Years
|
|
|
Five
Years
|
|
|
Sensitive
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
105,898
|
|
|
$
|
105,898
|
|
Federal Funds Sold
|
|
|
16,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,500
|
|
Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate
|
|
|
16,150
|
|
|
|
72,744
|
|
|
|
129,507
|
|
|
|
106,681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325,082
|
|
Floating Rate
|
|
|
5,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,407
|
|
|
|
3,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,375
|
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate
|
|
|
35,867
|
|
|
|
84,151
|
|
|
|
619,109
|
|
|
|
590,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,329,806
|
|
Floating Rate
|
|
|
1,693,610
|
|
|
|
52,986
|
|
|
|
148,448
|
|
|
|
7,973
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,903,017
|
|
Non-Accrual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,252
|
|
|
|
54,252
|
|
Deferred Loan Fees and Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,978
|
)
|
|
|
(45,978
|
)
|
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,479
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,467
|
|
|
|
204,327
|
|
|
|
236,315
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
1,767,260
|
|
|
$
|
234,402
|
|
|
$
|
913,471
|
|
|
$
|
750,114
|
|
|
$
|
318,499
|
|
|
$
|
3,983,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
and Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand Deposits
|
|
$
|
42,550
|
|
|
$
|
137,147
|
|
|
$
|
329,152
|
|
|
$
|
171,433
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
680,282
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
13,749
|
|
|
|
33,099
|
|
|
|
37,597
|
|
|
|
8,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,099
|
|
Money Market Checking and NOW Accounts
|
|
|
65,181
|
|
|
|
125,737
|
|
|
|
145,117
|
|
|
|
109,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
445,806
|
|
Time Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate
|
|
|
1,141,570
|
|
|
|
631,433
|
|
|
|
9,340
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,782,458
|
|
Floating Rate
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
FHLB Advances and Other Borrowings
|
|
|
364,500
|
|
|
|
105,000
|
|
|
|
13,084
|
|
|
|
4,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487,164
|
|
Junior Subordinated Debentures
|
|
|
82,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,406
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,932
|
|
|
|
40,932
|
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
371,545
|
|
|
|
371,545
|
|
|
|
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
$
|
1,710,010
|
|
|
$
|
1,032,416
|
|
|
$
|
534,290
|
|
|
$
|
294,553
|
|
|
$
|
412,477
|
|
|
$
|
3,983,746
|
|
|
|
Repricing Gap
|
|
$
|
57,250
|
|
|
$
|
(798,014
|
)
|
|
$
|
379,181
|
|
|
$
|
455,561
|
|
|
$
|
(93,978
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Cumulative Repricing Gap
|
|
$
|
57,250
|
|
|
$
|
(740,764
|
)
|
|
$
|
(361,583
|
)
|
|
$
|
93,978
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Cumulative Repricing Gap as a Percentage of Total Assets
|
|
|
1.44
|
%
|
|
|
(18.59
|
)%
|
|
|
(9.08
|
)%
|
|
|
2.36
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Repricing Gap as a Percentage of Interest-Earning
Assets
|
|
|
1.58
|
%
|
|
|
(20.39
|
)%
|
|
|
(9.95
|
)%
|
|
|
2.59
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The repricing gap analysis measures the static timing of
repricing risk of assets and liabilities (i.e., a
point-in-time
analysis measuring the difference between assets maturing or
repricing in a period and liabilities maturing or repricing
within the same time period). Assets are assigned to maturity
and repricing categories based on their expected repayment or
repricing dates, and liabilities are assigned based on their
repricing or maturity dates. Core deposits that have no maturity
dates (demand deposits, savings, money market checking and NOW
accounts) are assigned to categories based on expected decay
rates.
On December 31, 2007, the cumulative repricing gap as a
percentage of interest-earning assets in the less than three
month period was 1.58 percent. This decrease from the
previous years figure of 29.26 percent was caused
primarily by increases of $329.5 million and
$363.6 million in fixed rate certificates of deposit and
FHLB advances and other borrowings, respectively,
40
with maturities of less than three months. The cumulative
repricing percentage in the less than twelve month period also
moved lower, reaching (20.39) percent. This was a decrease from
the previous years figure of (2.56) percent. The decrease
was caused primarily by increases of $105.2 million and
$423.6 million in fixed rate certificates of deposit and
FHLB advances and other borrowings, respectively, with
maturities of less than twelve months.
The following table summarizes the status of the cumulative gap
position as of the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less
Than
|
|
|
Less
Than
|
|
|
|
Three
Months
|
|
|
Twelve
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Repricing Gap
|
|
$
|
57,250
|
|
|
$
|
970,441
|
|
|
$
|
(740,764
|
)
|
|
$
|
(85,051
|
)
|
Percentage of Total Assets
|
|
|
1.44
|
%
|
|
|
26.05
|
%
|
|
|
(18.59
|
)%
|
|
|
(2.28
|
)%
|
Percentage of Interest-Earning Assets
|
|
|
1.58
|
%
|
|
|
29.26
|
%
|
|
|
(20.39
|
)%
|
|
|
(2.56
|
)%
|
|
|
The spread between interest income on interest-earning assets
and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities is the
principal component of net interest income, and interest rate
changes substantially affect our financial performance. We
emphasize capital protection through stable earnings rather than
maximizing yield. In order to achieve stable earnings, we
prudently manage our assets and liabilities and closely monitor
the percentage changes in net interest income and equity value
in relation to limits established within our guidelines.
To supplement traditional gap analysis, we perform simulation
modeling to estimate the potential effects of interest rate
changes. The following table summarizes one of the stress
simulations performed to forecast the impact of changing
interest rates on net interest income and the market value of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities
reflected on our balance sheet (i.e., an instantaneous parallel
shift in the yield curve of the magnitude indicated). This
sensitivity analysis is compared to policy limits, which specify
the maximum tolerance level for net interest income exposure
over a one-year horizon, given the basis point adjustment in
interest rates reflected below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate
Shock Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
Changes
|
|
|
Change in
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Economic
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Economic
|
|
Change
in
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Value
of
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Value
of
|
|
Interest
Rate
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
200
|
%
|
|
|
3.55
|
%
|
|
|
(18.92
|
)%
|
|
$
|
5,169
|
|
|
$
|
(101,438
|
)
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
1.78
|
%
|
|
|
(9.80
|
)%
|
|
$
|
2,586
|
|
|
$
|
(52,565
|
)
|
|
(100
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.86
|
)%
|
|
|
10.48
|
%
|
|
$
|
(2,707
|
)
|
|
$
|
56,200
|
|
|
(200
|
)%
|
|
|
(3.84
|
)%
|
|
|
21.55
|
%
|
|
$
|
(5,588
|
)
|
|
$
|
115,576
|
|
|
|
The estimated sensitivity does not necessarily represent our
forecast and the results may not be indicative of actual changes
to our net interest income. These estimates are based upon a
number of assumptions including: the nature and timing of
interest rate levels including yield curve shape, prepayments on
loans and securities, pricing strategies on loans and deposits,
and replacement of asset and liability cash flows. While the
assumptions used are based on current economic and local market
conditions, there is no assurance as to the predictive nature of
these conditions, including how customer preferences or
competitor influences might change.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Liquidity of the Bank is defined as the ability to supply cash
as quickly as needed without causing a severe deterioration in
profitability. The Banks liquidity consists primarily of
available cash positions, Federal funds sold and short-term
investments categorized as available for sale securities, which
can be disposed of without significant capital losses in the
ordinary course of business, plus borrowing capacities, which
include Federal funds lines, repurchase agreements and FHLB
advances. Therefore, maintenance of high quality loans and
securities that can be used for collateral in repurchase
agreements or other secured borrowings is important feature of
our liquidity management.
The maintenance of a proper level of liquid assets is critical
for both the liquidity and the profitability of the Bank. Since
the primary purpose of the investment portfolio is to ensure the
Bank has adequate liquidity, management maintains appropriate
levels of liquid assets to avoid exposure to higher than
necessary liquidity risk. Liquidity risk may increase when the
Bank has few short-duration securities available for sale
and/or is
not capable of raising funds as quickly as necessary at
acceptable rates in the capital or money markets. A heavy and
sudden increase in cash demands for loans
and/or
deposits can tighten the liquidity position. Several ratios are
reviewed on a daily, monthly and quarterly basis to manage the
liquidity position and to preempt any liquidity crisis.
41
Specific statistics, which include the loans-to-assets ratio,
off-balance sheet items and dependence on non-core deposits,
foreign deposits, lines of credit and liquid assets, are
reviewed regularly for liquidity management purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Liquidity
Ratios
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Core Deposits/Total Assets
|
|
|
26.9
|
%
|
|
|
30.1
|
%
|
|
|
35.3
|
%
|
Short-Term Non-Core Funding/Total Assets
|
|
|
54.8
|
%
|
|
|
46.0
|
%
|
|
|
41.8
|
%
|
Net Loans/Total Assets
|
|
|
79.8
|
%
|
|
|
76.6
|
%
|
|
|
72.4
|
%
|
Investments/Deposits
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
|
15.9
|
%
|
|
|
18.9
|
%
|
Loans and Investments/Deposits
|
|
|
122.0
|
%
|
|
|
112.2
|
%
|
|
|
106.3
|
%
|
Off-Balance Sheet Items/Total Assets
|
|
|
15.8
|
%
|
|
|
19.0
|
%
|
|
|
18.5
|
%
|
|
|
The net loans to total assets ratio increased to
79.8 percent as of December 31, 2007, compared to
76.6 percent at December 31, 2006. The ratio of loans
and investments to deposits increased to 122.0 percent as
the Bank made use of short-term borrowings to fund a portion of
loan portfolio growth. Off-balance sheet items as a percentage
of total assets decreased at December 31, 2006 to
15.8 percent, compared to 19.0 percent at
December 31, 2006, and the total amount decreased to
$643.6 million at December 31, 2007 from
$708.8 million at December 31, 2006. The decrease was
primarily due to a $54.0 million decrease in commitments to
extend credit. During the year, the percentage of off-balance
sheet items to total assets generally ranged from
18 percent to 20 percent. The ratio of short-term
non-core funding to total assets was 54.8 percent at
December 31, 2007, compared to 46.0 percent at
December 31, 2006.
Foreign deposits are
U.S.-based
deposits made by foreign customers. Foreign deposit risk deals
with dependency on foreign deposits that could adversely affect
the Banks liquidity. These liabilities are assumed to be
volatile because of the variability of social, political and
environmental conditions in foreign countries. As of
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, foreign deposits were
$331.2 million, $325.4 million and
$294.3 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2007, we maintained a total of
$186.0 million in credit lines secured by us to meet our
liquidity needs. In addition, we maintained eight master
repurchase agreements, all of which can furnish liquidity to us
in consideration of bond collateral. We also can meet our
liquidity needs through borrowings from the FHLB. We are
eligible to borrow up of 25 percent of our total assets
from the FHLB.
As of December 31, 2007, there were no material commitments
for capital expenditures. We raise capital in the form of
deposits, borrowings (primarily FHLB advances and junior
subordinated debentures) and equity, and expect to continue to
rely upon deposits as the primary source of capital.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
For a discussion of off-balance sheet arrangements, see
Item 1. Business Off-Balance Sheet
Commitments.
Contractual
Obligations
Our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2007 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More
Than
|
|
|
More
Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One
Year
|
|
|
Three
Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
Less
|
|
|
and
Less
|
|
|
More
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less
Than
|
|
|
Than
Three
|
|
|
Than
Five
|
|
|
Than
Five
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual
Obligations
|
|
One
Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
Time Deposits
|
|
$
|
1,773,057
|
|
|
$
|
4,313
|
|
|
$
|
5,027
|
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
1,782,512
|
|
Commitments to Extend Credit
|
|
|
524,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
524,349
|
|
FHLB Advances and Other Borrowings
|
|
|
469,500
|
|
|
|
13,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,580
|
|
|
|
487,164
|
|
Junior Subordinated Debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,406
|
|
|
|
82,406
|
|
Standby Letters of Credit
|
|
|
43,643
|
|
|
|
4,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
48,071
|
|
Operating Lease Obligations
|
|
|
2,906
|
|
|
|
5,509
|
|
|
|
2,684
|
|
|
|
5,179
|
|
|
|
16,278
|
|
|
|
Total
Contractual Obligations
|
|
$
|
2,813,455
|
|
|
$
|
27,234
|
|
|
$
|
7,711
|
|
|
$
|
92,380
|
|
|
$
|
2,940,780
|
|
|
|
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
SFAS No. 160, Non-Controlling Interest in
Consolidated Financial Statements an Amendment of
ARB No. 51 In December 2007, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
SFAS No. 160, which requires that a non-controlling
interest in a subsidiary (i.e., minority interest) be reported
in the equity section
42
of the consolidated balance sheet instead of being reported as a
liability or in the mezzanine section between debt and equity.
It also requires that the consolidated statement of operations
include net income attributable to both the parent and
non-controlling interest of a consolidated subsidiary. A
disclosure must be made on the face of the consolidated
statement of operations of the net income attributable to the
parent and to the non-controlling interest. In addition,
regardless of whether the parent purchases additional ownership
interest, sells a portion of its ownership interest in a
subsidiary or the subsidiary participates in a transaction that
changes the parents ownership interest, as long as the
parent retains controlling interest, the transaction is
considered an equity transaction. SFAS No. 160 is
effective for annual periods beginning after December 15,
2008. We are currently assessing the impact that the adoption of
SFAS No. 160 will have on our financial position and
results of operations.
SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations
In December 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 141(R), which revises SFAS No. 141
and changes multiple aspects of the accounting for business
combinations. Under the guidance in SFAS No. 141(R),
the acquisition method must be used, which requires the acquirer
to recognize most identifiable assets acquired, liabilities
assumed and non-controlling interests in the acquiree at their
full fair value on the acquisition date. Goodwill is to be
recognized as the excess of the consideration transferred plus
the fair value of the non-controlling interest over the fair
values of the identifiable net assets acquired. Subsequent
changes in the fair value of contingent consideration classified
as a liability are to be recognized in earnings, while
contingent consideration classified as equity is not to be
remeasured. Costs such as transaction costs are to be excluded
from acquisition accounting, generally leading to recognizing
expense and additionally, restructuring costs that do not meet
certain criteria at acquisition date are to be subsequently
recognized as post-acquisition costs. SFAS No. 141(R)
is effective for business combinations for which the acquisition
date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting
period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. We are
currently assessing the impact that the adoption of
SFAS No. 141(R) will have on our financial position
and results of operations.
SAB No. 109, Written Loan Commitments
Recorded at Fair Value through Earnings On
November 5, 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
(SAB) No. 109. Previously,
SAB No. 105, Application of Accounting
Principles to Loan Commitments, stated that in
measuring the fair value of a derivative loan commitment, a
company should not incorporate the expected net future cash
flows related to the associated servicing of the loan.
SAB No. 109 supersedes SAB No. 105 and
indicates that the expected net future cash flows related to the
associated servicing of the loan should be included in measuring
fair value for all written loan commitments that are accounted
for at fair value through earnings. SAB No. 105 also
indicated that internally-developed intangible assets should not
be recorded as part of the fair value of a derivative loan
commitment, and SAB No. 109 retains that view.
SAB No. 109 is effective for derivative loan
commitments issued or modified in fiscal quarters beginning
after December 15, 2007. The adoption of
SAB No. 109 did not have a material impact on our
financial condition or results of operations.
EITF Issue
No. 06-10,
Accounting for Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Life
Insurance Agreements In March 2007, the
FASB ratified EITF Issue
No. 06-10,
which provides guidance for determining a liability for the
postretirement benefit obligation as well as recognition and
measurement of the associated asset based on the terms of the
collateral assignment agreement. EITF Issue
No. 06-10
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2007. The adoption of EITF Issue
No. 06-10
did not have a material impact on our financial condition or
results of operations.
SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
In February 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which
gives entities the option to measure eligible financial assets,
and financial liabilities at fair value on an instrument by
instrument basis, that are otherwise not permitted to be
accounted for at fair value under other accounting standards.
The election to use the fair value option is available when an
entity first recognizes a financial asset or financial
liability. Subsequent changes in fair value must be recorded in
earnings. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of the
beginning of a companys first fiscal year after
November 15, 2007. We are required to and plan to adopt the
provisions of SFAS No. 159 beginning in the first
quarter of 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not
have a material impact on our financial condition or results of
operations.
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
In September 2006, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 157, which defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007, and interim periods within that fiscal
year. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a
material impact on our financial condition or results of
operations.
EITF Issue
No. 06-4,
Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement
Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split Dollar Life Insurance
Arrangements In September 2006, the
FASBs
43
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) issued EITF Issue
No. 06-4,
which requires the recognition of a liability related to the
postretirement benefits covered by an endorsement split-dollar
life insurance arrangement. The consensus highlights that the
employer (who is also the policyholder) has a liability for the
benefit it is providing to its employee. As such, if the
policyholder has agreed to maintain the insurance policy in
force for the employees benefit during his or her
retirement, then the liability recognized during the
employees active service period should be based on the
future cost of insurance to be incurred during the
employees retirement. Alternatively, if the policyholder
has agreed to provide the employee with a death benefit, then
the liability for the future death benefit should be recognized
by following the guidance in SFAS No. 106,
Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits
Other Than Pensions, or Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 12, as appropriate. For transition, an entity
can choose to apply the guidance using either of the following
approaches: (a) a change in accounting principle through
retrospective application to all periods presented; or
(b) a change in accounting principle through a
cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance in retained earnings
at the beginning of the year of adoption. The disclosures are
required in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007.
The adoption of EITF Issue
No. 06-4
did not have a material impact on our financial condition or
results of operations.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
For quantitative and qualitative disclosures regarding market
risks in the Banks portfolio, see Item 7.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations Interest Rate Risk
Management and Liquidity and
Capital Resources.
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
The financial statements required to be filed as a part of this
Report are set forth on pages 50 through 84.
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
As of December 31, 2007, Hanmi Financial carried out an
evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of
Hanmi Financials management, including Hanmi
Financials Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
Hanmi Financials disclosure controls and procedures and
internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules.
Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer concluded that:
|
|
|
Hanmi Financials disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of the end of the period covered by this report in
timely alerting them to material information relating to Hanmi
Financial that is required to be included in Hanmi
Financials periodic SEC filings; and
|
|
|
Hanmi Financials internal controls over financial
reporting provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles.
|
During the quarter ended December 31, 2007, there have been
no changes in Hanmi Financials internal control over
financial reporting that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, Hanmi Financials
internal control over financial reporting.
Disclosure controls and procedures are defined in SEC rules as
controls and other procedures designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in Exchange Act reports is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Hanmi
Financials disclosure controls and procedures were
designed to ensure that material information related to Hanmi
Financial, including subsidiaries, is made known to management,
including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, in a timely manner.
KPMG LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that
audited and reported on the consolidated financial statements of
Hanmi Financial and subsidiaries, has issued a report on Hanmi
Financials internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007. The report expresses an unqualified
opinion on the effectiveness of Hanmi Financials internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007.
Managements
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management of Hanmi Financial Corporation (Hanmi
Financial) is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting pursuant to
the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Hanmi Financials internal control over
financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of consolidated financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted
44
accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting
includes those written policies and procedures that:
|
|
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the assets of the company;
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance that receipts and expenditures of
the company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the
company; and
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
consolidated financial statements.
|
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of Hanmi Financials
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007. Management based this assessment on
criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting
described in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Managements assessment included an evaluation
of the design of Hanmi Financials internal control over
financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness
of its internal control over financial reporting. Management
reviewed the results of its assessment with the Audit Committee
of our Board of Directors.
Based on this assessment, management determined that, as of
December 31, 2007, Hanmi Financial maintained effective
internal control over financial reporting.
45
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Hanmi Financial Corporation:
We have audited Hanmi Financial Corporation and
subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). Hanmi Financial Corporations management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, included in the
accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on the Companys internal control over financial reporting
based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Hanmi Financial Corporation maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria
established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Hanmi Financial Corporation as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in stockholders equity
and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and our
report dated February 29, 2008 expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Los Angeles, California
February 29, 2008
46
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
Except as hereinafter noted, the information concerning
directors and officers of Hanmi Financial is incorporated by
reference from the sections entitled The Board of
Directors and Executive Officers and
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance of Hanmi Financials Definitive Proxy
Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be
filed with the Commission within 120 days after the close
of Hanmi Financials fiscal year.
Audit
Committee Financial Expert
Mark K. Mason was appointed to the Audit Committee of the Board
of Directors as of May 23, 2007. The Board has determined
that Mr. Mason meets the independence standards required by
NASDAQ and is a financial expert within the meaning
of the current rules of the SEC.
Code of
Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that
applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial
and accounting officer, controller and other persons performing
similar functions. It will be provided to any stockholder
without charge, upon the written request of that stockholder.
Such requests should be addressed to Judith Kim, Associate
General Counsel, Hanmi Financial Corporation, 3660 Wilshire
Boulevard, Penthouse Suite A, Los Angeles, California
90010. It is also available on our website at
www.hanmi.com.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
Information concerning executive compensation is incorporated by
reference from the section entitled Executive
Compensation of Hanmi Financials Definitive
Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which
will be filed with the Commission within 120 days after the
close of Hanmi Financials fiscal year.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial
owners and management and related stockholder matters will
appear under the caption Beneficial Ownership of
Principal Stockholders and Management in Hanmi
Financials Definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
|
Information concerning certain relationships and related
transactions and director independence is incorporated by
reference from the section entitled Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions of Hanmi
Financials Definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed with the Commission
within 120 days after the close of Hanmi Financials
fiscal year.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accounting Fees and Services
|
Information concerning Hanmi Financials principal
accountants fees and services is incorporated by reference
from the section entitled Independent Accountants
of Hanmi Financials Definitive Proxy Statement for the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed with the
Commission within 120 days after the close of Hanmi
Financials fiscal year.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits,
Financial Statement Schedules
|
(a) Financial Statements and Schedules
(1) The Financial Statements required to be filed hereunder
are listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on
page 52 of this Report.
(2) All Financial Statement Schedules have been omitted as
the required information is inapplicable or has been included in
the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(3) The Exhibits required to be filed with this Report are
listed in the Exhibit Index included herein at page 88.
47
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Index to
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
49
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
50
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
51
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity
and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
52
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
53
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
48
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Hanmi Financial Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Hanmi Financial Corporation and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in stockholders equity
and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Hanmi Financial Corporation and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Hanmi
Financial Corporations internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria
established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated
February 29, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
Los Angeles, California
February 29, 2008
49
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance
Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and Due From Banks
|
|
$
|
105,898
|
|
|
$
|
97,501
|
|
Federal Funds Sold
|
|
|
16,500
|
|
|
|
41,000
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
122,398
|
|
|
|
138,501
|
|
Term Federal Funds Sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
Securities Held to Maturity, at Amortized Cost (Fair Value:
2007 $941; 2006 $969)
|
|
|
940
|
|
|
|
967
|
|
Securities Available for Sale, at Fair Value
|
|
|
349,517
|
|
|
|
390,612
|
|
Loans Receivable, Net of Allowance for Loan Losses of $43,611
and $27,557 at December 31, 2007 and 2006, Respectively
|
|
|
3,234,762
|
|
|
|
2,813,520
|
|
Loans Held for Sale, at the Lower of Cost or Fair Value
|
|
|
6,335
|
|
|
|
23,870
|
|
Customers Liability on Acceptances
|
|
|
5,387
|
|
|
|
8,403
|
|
Premises and Equipment, Net
|
|
|
20,800
|
|
|
|
20,075
|
|
Accrued Interest Receivable
|
|
|
17,500
|
|
|
|
16,919
|
|
Other Real Estate Owned
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes
|
|
|
18,470
|
|
|
|
13,064
|
|
Servicing Assets
|
|
|
4,336
|
|
|
|
4,579
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
107,100
|
|
|
|
207,646
|
|
Other Intangible Assets
|
|
|
6,908
|
|
|
|
6,312
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank Stock, at Cost
|
|
|
11,733
|
|
|
|
11,733
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock, at Cost
|
|
|
21,746
|
|
|
|
13,189
|
|
Bank-Owned Life Insurance
|
|
|
24,525
|
|
|
|
23,592
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
31,002
|
|
|
|
27,261
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
3,983,746
|
|
|
$
|
3,725,243
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-Bearing
|
|
$
|
680,282
|
|
|
$
|
728,347
|
|
Interest-Bearing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
93,099
|
|
|
|
99,255
|
|
Money Market Checking and NOW Accounts
|
|
|
445,806
|
|
|
|
438,267
|
|
Time Deposits of $100,000 or More
|
|
|
1,441,683
|
|
|
|
1,383,358
|
|
Other Time Deposits
|
|
|
340,829
|
|
|
|
295,488
|
|
|
|
Total Deposits
|
|
|
3,001,699
|
|
|
|
2,944,715
|
|
Accrued Interest Payable
|
|
|
21,828
|
|
|
|
22,582
|
|
Acceptances Outstanding
|
|
|
5,387
|
|
|
|
8,403
|
|
FHLB Advances and Other Borrowings
|
|
|
487,164
|
|
|
|
169,037
|
|
Junior Subordinated Debentures
|
|
|
82,406
|
|
|
|
82,406
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
13,717
|
|
|
|
10,983
|
|
|
|
Total
Liabilities
|
|
|
3,612,201
|
|
|
|
3,238,126
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $.001 Par Value; Authorized
200,000,000 Shares; Issued 50,493,441 Shares
(45,860,941 Shares Outstanding) and 50,239,613 Shares
(49,076,613 Shares Outstanding) at December 31, 2007
and 2006, Respectively
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Additional Paid-In Capital
|
|
|
348,073
|
|
|
|
344,810
|
|
Unearned Compensation
|
|
|
(245
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Securities Available for Sale,
Interest-Only Strips and Interest Rate Swaps, Net of Income
Taxes of $527 and ($1,450) at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
Respectively
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
(3,200
|
)
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
|
93,404
|
|
|
|
165,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
441,557
|
|
|
|
507,158
|
|
Less Treasury Stock, at Cost; 4,632,500 Shares and
1,163,000 Shares at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
Respectively
|
|
|
(70,012
|
)
|
|
|
(20,041
|
)
|
|
|
Total
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
371,545
|
|
|
|
487,117
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
$
|
3,983,746
|
|
|
$
|
3,725,243
|
|
|
|
See
Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
50
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and Fees on Loans
|
|
$
|
261,992
|
|
|
$
|
239,075
|
|
|
$
|
180,845
|
|
Taxable Interest on Investments
|
|
|
13,399
|
|
|
|
15,2690
|
|
|
|
14,278
|
|
Tax-Exempt Interest on Investments
|
|
|
3,055
|
|
|
|
3,087
|
|
|
|
3,122
|
|
Dividends on FHLB and FRB Stock
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
|
|
1,107
|
|
Interest on Federal Funds Sold
|
|
|
1,032
|
|
|
|
1,402
|
|
|
|
1,589
|
|
Interest on Term Federal Funds Sold
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest and Dividend Income
|
|
|
280,896
|
|
|
|
260,189
|
|
|
|
200,941
|
|
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on Deposits
|
|
|
108,100
|
|
|
|
93,036
|
|
|
|
54,192
|
|
Interest on FHLB Advances and Other Borrowings
|
|
|
13,949
|
|
|
|
6,977
|
|
|
|
3,017
|
|
Interest on Junior Subordinated Debentures
|
|
|
6,644
|
|
|
|
6,416
|
|
|
|
4,902
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Expense
|
|
|
128,693
|
|
|
|
106,429
|
|
|
|
62,111
|
|
|
|
NET INTEREST INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES
|
|
|
152,203
|
|
|
|
153,760
|
|
|
|
138,830
|
|
Provision for Credit Losses
|
|
|
38,323
|
|
|
|
7,173
|
|
|
|
5,395
|
|
|
|
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES
|
|
|
113,880
|
|
|
|
146,587
|
|
|
|
133,435
|
|
|
|
NON-INTEREST INCOME:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts
|
|
|
18,061
|
|
|
|
17,134
|
|
|
|
15,782
|
|
Insurance Commissions
|
|
|
4,954
|
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
651
|
|
Trade Finance Fees
|
|
|
4,493
|
|
|
|
4,567
|
|
|
|
4,269
|
|
Remittance Fees
|
|
|
2,049
|
|
|
|
2,056
|
|
|
|
2,122
|
|
Other Service Charges and Fees
|
|
|
2,527
|
|
|
|
2,359
|
|
|
|
2,496
|
|
Bank-Owned Life Insurance Income
|
|
|
933
|
|
|
|
879
|
|
|
|
845
|
|
Increase in Fair Value of Derivatives
|
|
|
683
|
|
|
|
1,074
|
|
|
|
1,105
|
|
Other Income
|
|
|
1,702
|
|
|
|
1,157
|
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
Gain on Sales of Loans
|
|
|
5,452
|
|
|
|
6,917
|
|
|
|
3,021
|
|
Gain on Sales of Other Real Estate Owned
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on Sales of Securities Available for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Loss on Securities
|
|
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Interest Income
|
|
|
40,006
|
|
|
|
36,963
|
|
|
|
31,450
|
|
|
|
NON-INTEREST EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and Employee Benefits
|
|
|
47,036
|
|
|
|
40,512
|
|
|
|
36,839
|
|
Occupancy and Equipment
|
|
|
10,494
|
|
|
|
9,643
|
|
|
|
9,413
|
|
Data Processing
|
|
|
6,390
|
|
|
|
5,857
|
|
|
|
4,844
|
|
Advertising and Promotion
|
|
|
3,630
|
|
|
|
2,997
|
|
|
|
2,913
|
|
Supplies and Communications
|
|
|
2,592
|
|
|
|
2,391
|
|
|
|
2,556
|
|
Professional Fees
|
|
|
2,468
|
|
|
|
1,910
|
|
|
|
2,201
|
|
Amortization of Other Intangible Assets
|
|
|
2,324
|
|
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
Decrease in Fair Value of Embedded Options
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
Other Operating Expenses
|
|
|
11,871
|
|
|
|
11,042
|
|
|
|
8,411
|
|
Merger-Related Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(509
|
)
|
Impairment Loss on Goodwill
|
|
|
102,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Interest Expenses
|
|
|
189,929
|
|
|
|
77,313
|
|
|
|
70,201
|
|
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
(36,043
|
)
|
|
|
106,237
|
|
|
|
94,684
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
24,477
|
|
|
|
40,588
|
|
|
|
36,455
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
(LOSS)
|
|
$
|
(60,520
|
)
|
|
$
|
65,649
|
|
|
$
|
58,229
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(1.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.34
|
|
|
$
|
1.18
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.33
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
47,787,213
|
|
|
|
48,850,221
|
|
|
|
49,174,885
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
47,787,213
|
|
|
|
49,435,128
|
|
|
|
49,942,356
|
|
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
See
Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
51
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity and
Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock Number of Shares
|
|
|
Stockholders
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Issued
and
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Issued
and
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Stock,
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
at
Cost
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AT
JANUARY 1, 2005
|
|
|
49,330,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,330,704
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
334,932
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,035
|
|
|
$
|
63,894
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
399,910
|
|
Exercises of Stock Options
|
|
|
391,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
391,094
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,516
|
|
Restricted Stock Award
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,815
|
|
|
|
(1,815
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Unearned Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
665
|
|
Tax Benefit from Exercise of Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
Stock Repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,163,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,163,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,041
|
)
|
|
|
(20,041
|
)
|
Cash Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,813
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,813
|
)
|
Comprehensive Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,229
|
|
Change in Unrealized Gain on Securities Available for Sale,
Interest-Only Strips and Interest Rate Swaps, Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,418
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,418
|
)
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AT
DECEMBER 31, 2005
|
|
|
49,821,798
|
|
|
|
(1,163,000
|
)
|
|
|
48,658,798
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
339,991
|
|
|
|
(1,150
|
)
|
|
|
(4,383
|
)
|
|
|
112,310
|
|
|
|
(20,041
|
)
|
|
|
426,777
|
|
Cumulative Adjustment Tax Credit Funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(656
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(656
|
)
|
Cumulative Adjustment Share-Based Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(916
|
)
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
Exercises of Stock Options and Stock Warrants
|
|
|
417,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
417,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,553
|
|
Share-Based Compensation Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,521
|
|
Tax Benefit from Exercise of Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
661
|
|
Cash Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,805
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,805
|
)
|
Comprehensive Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,649
|
|
Change in Unrealized Gain on Securities Available for Sale,
Interest-Only Strips and Interest Rate Swaps, Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,183
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AT
DECEMBER 31, 2006
|
|
|
50,239,613
|
|
|
|
(1,163,000
|
)
|
|
|
49,076,613
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
344,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,200
|
)
|
|
|
165,498
|
|
|
|
(20,041
|
)
|
|
|
487,117
|
|
Shares Issued for Business Acquisitions
|
|
|
102,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,198
|
|
Exercises of Stock Options and Stock Warrants
|
|
|
132,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
Share-Based Compensation Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,880
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,891
|
|
Restricted Stock Awards
|
|
|
19,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
(256
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Benefit from Exercise of Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
Cash Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,574
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,574
|
)
|
Repurchase of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,469,500
|
)
|
|
|
(3,469,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,971
|
)
|
|
|
(49,971
|
)
|
Repurchase of Stock Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,552
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,552
|
)
|
Comprehensive Loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60,520
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60,520
|
)
|
Change in Unrealized Gain on Securities Available for Sale,
Interest-Only Strips and Interest Rate Swaps, Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,475
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57,045
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AT
DECEMBER 31, 2007
|
|
|
50,493,441
|
|
|
|
(4,632,500
|
)
|
|
|
45,860,941
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
348,073
|
|
|
$
|
(245
|
)
|
|
$
|
275
|
|
|
$
|
93,404
|
|
|
$
|
(70,012
|
)
|
|
$
|
371,545
|
|
|
|
See
Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
52
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS
FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
(60,520
|
)
|
|
$
|
65,649
|
|
|
$
|
58,229
|
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income (Loss) to Net Cash Provided
By Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization of Premises and Equipment
|
|
|
2,953
|
|
|
|
2,924
|
|
|
|
2,704
|
|
Amortization of Premiums and Accretion of Discounts on
Investments, Net
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
Amortization of Other Intangible Assets
|
|
|
2,324
|
|
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
Share-Based Compensation Expense
|
|
|
1,891
|
|
|
|
1,521
|
|
|
|
665
|
|
Provision for Credit Losses
|
|
|
38,323
|
|
|
|
7,173
|
|
|
|
5,395
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank Stock Dividends
|
|
|
(708
|
)
|
|
|
(641
|
)
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
Gain on Sales of Securities Available for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Loss on Securities
|
|
|
1,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in Fair Value of Derivatives
|
|
|
(683
|
)
|
|
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
|
(1,105
|
)
|
Decrease in Fair Value of Embedded Options
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
Gain on Sales of Loans
|
|
|
(5,452
|
)
|
|
|
(6,917
|
)
|
|
|
(3,021
|
)
|
Gain on Sales of Other Real Estate Owned
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on Sales of Premises and Equipment
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Impairment Loss on Goodwill
|
|
|
102,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess Tax Benefit from Exercises of Stock Options
|
|
|
(193
|
)
|
|
|
(598
|
)
|
|
|
729
|
|
Deferred Tax Benefit
|
|
|
(14,618
|
)
|
|
|
(2,942
|
)
|
|
|
(2,707
|
)
|
Origination of Loans Held for Sale
|
|
|
(108,639
|
)
|
|
|
(154,608
|
)
|
|
|
(61,709
|
)
|
Proceeds from Sales of Loans Held for Sale
|
|
|
131,626
|
|
|
|
138,720
|
|
|
|
67,515
|
|
Increase in Accrued Interest Receivable
|
|
|
(581
|
)
|
|
|
(2,799
|
)
|
|
|
(4,091
|
)
|
(Increase) Decrease in Servicing Assets, Net
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
(669
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
Increase in Cash Surrender Value of Bank-Owned Life Insurance
|
|
|
(933
|
)
|
|
|
(879
|
)
|
|
|
(845
|
)
|
Increase in Other Assets
|
|
|
(4,040
|
)
|
|
|
(11,424
|
)
|
|
|
(2,015
|
)
|
Increase (Decrease) in Accrued Interest Payable
|
|
|
(754
|
)
|
|
|
10,671
|
|
|
|
4,811
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in Other Liabilities
|
|
|
3,034
|
|
|
|
(1,298
|
)
|
|
|
188
|
|
Other, Net
|
|
|
6,165
|
|
|
|
2,236
|
|
|
|
612
|
|
|
|
Net Cash
Provided By Operating Activities
|
|
|
93,650
|
|
|
|
48,316
|
|
|
|
68,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS
FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Redemption of Federal Reserve Bank Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
617
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Matured Term Federal Funds Sold
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Matured or Called Securities Available for Sale
|
|
|
89,958
|
|
|
|
56,729
|
|
|
|
89,885
|
|
Proceeds from Sales of Securities Available for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,005
|
|
|
|
11,360
|
|
Proceeds from Sales of Other Real Estate Owned
|
|
|
1,306
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Loans Receivable
|
|
|
(459,930
|
)
|
|
|
(352,678
|
)
|
|
|
(242,088
|
)
|
Purchase of Term Federal Funds Sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank
Stock
|
|
|
(7,849
|
)
|
|
|
(311
|
)
|
|
|
(2,264
|
)
|
Purchases of Securities Available for Sale
|
|
|
(44,980
|
)
|
|
|
(9,663
|
)
|
|
|
(132,700
|
)
|
Purchases of Premises and Equipment
|
|
|
(3,682
|
)
|
|
|
(2,237
|
)
|
|
|
(3,831
|
)
|
Business Acquisitions, Net of Cash Acquired
|
|
|
(4,121
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash
Used In Investing Activities
|
|
|
(424,298
|
)
|
|
|
(306,945
|
)
|
|
|
(279,638
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS
FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in Deposits
|
|
|
56,984
|
|
|
|
118,601
|
|
|
|
297,307
|
|
Proceeds from Exercises of Stock Options and Stock Warrants
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
|
|
3,553
|
|
|
|
2,516
|
|
Excess Tax Benefit from Exercises of Stock Options
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Issued for Business Acquisitions
|
|
|
2,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Paid to Acquire Treasury Stock
|
|
|
(49,971
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,041
|
)
|
Cash Paid to Repurchase Stock Warrants
|
|
|
(2,552
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Dividends Paid
|
|
|
(11,574
|
)
|
|
|
(11,805
|
)
|
|
|
(9,813
|
)
|
Proceeds from Long-Term FHLB Advances and Other Borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
7,411
|
|
Repayment of Long-Term FHLB Advances and Other Borrowings
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
|
|
(5,420
|
)
|
|
|
(30,246
|
)
|
Net Change in Short-Term FHLB Advances and Other Borrowings
|
|
|
318,546
|
|
|
|
(1,874
|
)
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
Net Cash
Provided By Financing Activities
|
|
|
314,545
|
|
|
|
233,653
|
|
|
|
247,007
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE
(DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(16,103
|
)
|
|
|
(24,976
|
)
|
|
|
36,313
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year
|
|
|
138,501
|
|
|
|
163,477
|
|
|
|
127,164
|
|
|
|
CASH AND
CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR
|
|
$
|
122,398
|
|
|
$
|
138,501
|
|
|
$
|
163,477
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Paid
|
|
$
|
129,447
|
|
|
$
|
117,100
|
|
|
$
|
41,266
|
|
Income Taxes Paid
|
|
$
|
38,232
|
|
|
$
|
45,869
|
|
|
$
|
37,650
|
|
Supplemental
Schedule of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer of Loans to Other Real Estate Owned
|
|
$
|
1,367
|
|
|
$
|
541
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accrued Dividend
|
|
$
|
3,030
|
|
|
$
|
2,941
|
|
|
$
|
2,433
|
|
See
Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
53
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
|
|
Note 1
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies
|
The accounting and reporting policies of Hanmi Financial
Corporation and subsidiaries conform to U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. A summary of the significant
accounting policies consistently applied in the preparation of
the accompanying consolidated financial statements follows.
Principles
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Hanmi Financial Corporation (Hanmi Financial,
we, us or our) and our
wholly owned subsidiaries, Hanmi Bank (the Bank),
Chun-Ha Insurance Services, Inc. (Chun-Ha) and All
World Insurance Services, Inc. (All World).
Intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in
consolidation.
Hanmi Financial was formed as a holding company of the Bank and
registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the
Securities Act of 1933 on March 17, 2001. Subsequent to its
formation, each of the Banks shares was exchanged for one
share of Hanmi Financial with an equal value. Our primary
operations are related to traditional banking activities,
including the acceptance of deposits and the lending and
investing of money through operation of the Bank.
The Bank is a community bank conducting general business
banking, with its primary market encompassing the
Korean-American
community as well as other communities in the multi-ethnic
populations of Los Angeles County, Orange County,
San Bernardino County, San Diego County, the
San Francisco Bay area, and the Silicon Valley area in
Santa Clara County. The Banks full-service offices
are located in business areas where many of the businesses are
run by immigrants and other minority groups. The Banks
client base reflects the multi-ethnic composition of these
communities. The Bank is a California state-chartered,
FDIC-insured financial institution. As of December 31,
2007, the Bank maintained a branch network of 24 full-service
branch offices in California and eight loan production offices
in California, Colorado, Georgia, Illinois, Texas, Virginia and
Washington.
Our other subsidiaries, Chun-Ha and All World, were acquired in
January 2007. Founded in 1989, Chun-Ha and All World are
insurance brokerages that offer a complete line of insurance
products, including life, commercial, automobile, health, and
property and casualty.
Cash and
Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks,
overnight Federal funds sold, all of which have original or
purchased maturities of less than 90 days.
Securities
Securities are classified into three categories and accounted
for as follows:
|
|
1. |
Securities that we have the positive intent and ability to hold
to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity and
reported at amortized cost;
|
|
|
2.
|
Securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose
of selling them in the near future are classified as
trading securities and reported at fair value.
Unrealized gains and losses are recognized in earnings; and
|
|
3.
|
Securities not classified as held-to-maturity or trading
securities are classified as available for sale and
reported at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses are reported
as a separate component of stockholders equity as
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of income
taxes.
|
Accreted discounts and amortized premiums on investment
securities are included in interest income using the effective
interest method
54
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 1
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting
Policies (Continued)
|
over the remaining period to the call date or contractual
maturity and, in the case of mortgage-backed securities and
securities with call features, adjusted for anticipated
prepayments. Unrealized and realized gains or losses related to
holding or selling of securities are calculated using the
specific-identification method.
We assess, at each reporting date, whether there is an
other-than-temporary impairment to our investment
securities. We examine all individual securities that are in an
unrealized loss position at each reporting date for
other-than-temporary impairment. Specific investment
level factors we examine to assess impairment include the
severity and duration of the loss, an analysis of the issuers of
the securities and if there has been any cause for default on
the securities and any change in the rating of the securities by
the various rating agencies. Additionally, we reexamine the
financial resources and overall ability the Bank has and the
intent management has to hold the securities until their fair
values recover. To the extent there is an impairment of value
deemed other than temporary for a security held to
maturity or available for sale, a loss is recognized in earnings
and a new cost basis established for the security.
We also have a minority investment of 4.99 percent in a
non-publicly traded company, Pacific International Bank. The
investment is carried at cost and is included in other assets on
the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2007
and 2006, its carrying value was $511,000. We monitor the
investment for impairment and make appropriate reductions in
carrying value when necessary.
Loans
We originate loans for investment, with such designation made at
the time of origination. Loans are recorded at the contractual
amounts due from borrowers, adjusted for undisbursed funds, net
deferred loan fees and origination costs, and the allowance for
loan losses.
Loans
Held for Sale
Loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market,
primarily Small Business Administration (SBA) loans,
are carried at the lower of cost or market value in the
aggregate. Net unrealized losses, if any, are recognized through
a valuation allowance by charges to income.
Loan
Interest Income and Fees
Interest on loans is credited to income as earned and is accrued
only if deemed collectible. Direct loan origination costs are
offset by loan origination fees with the net amount deferred and
recognized over the contractual lives of the loans in interest
income as a yield adjustment using the effective interest
method. Discounts or premiums associated with purchased loans
are accreted or amortized to interest income using the interest
method over the contractual lives of the loans, adjusted for
prepayments. Accretion of discounts and deferred loan fees is
discontinued when loans are placed on non-accrual status.
Loans are placed on non-accrual status when, in the opinion of
management, the full timely collection of principal or interest
is in doubt. Generally, the accrual of interest is discontinued
when principal or interest payments become more than
90 days past due. However, in certain instances, we may
place a particular loan on non-accrual status earlier, depending
upon the individual circumstances surrounding the loans
delinquency. When an asset is placed on non-accrual status,
previously accrued but unpaid interest is reversed against
current income. Subsequent collections of cash are applied as
principal reductions when received, except when the ultimate
collectibility of principal is probable, in which case interest
payments are credited to income. Non-accrual assets may be
restored to accrual status when principal and interest become
current and full repayment is expected. Interest income is
recognized on the accrual basis for impaired loans not meeting
the criteria for non-accrual.
55
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 1
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting
Policies (Continued)
|
Allowance
for Loan Losses
Management believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate to
provide for probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio.
However, the allowance is an estimate that is inherently
uncertain and depends on the outcome of future events.
Managements estimates are based on previous loan loss
experience; volume, growth and composition of the loan
portfolio; the value of collateral; and current economic
conditions. Our lending is concentrated in commercial, consumer,
construction and real estate loans in the greater Los
Angeles/Orange County area. Although management believes the
level of the allowance is adequate to absorb probable losses
inherent in the loan portfolio, a decline in the local economy
may result in increasing losses that cannot reasonably be
predicted at this date.
Non-performing assets consist of loans on non-accrual status,
loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest,
loans restructured where the terms of repayment have been
renegotiated resulting in a reduction or deferral of interest or
principal, and other real estate owned (OREO). Loans
are generally placed on non-accrual status when they become
90 days past due unless management believes the loan is
adequately collateralized and in the process of collection.
Additionally, the Bank may place loans that are not 90 days
past due on non-accrual status, if management reasonably
believes the borrower will not be able to comply with the
contractual loan repayment terms and collection of principal or
interest is in question.
When loans are placed on non-accrual status, accrued but unpaid
interest is reversed against the current years income, and
interest income on non-accrual loans is recorded on a cash
basis. The Bank may treat payments as interest income or return
of principal depending upon managements opinion of the
ultimate risk of loss on the individual loan. Cash payments are
treated as interest income where management believes the
remaining principal balance is fully collectible.
Loan losses are charged, and recoveries are credited, to the
allowance account. Additions to the allowance account are
charged to the provision for credit losses. The allowance for
loan losses is maintained at a level considered adequate by
management to absorb probable losses in the loan portfolio. The
adequacy of the allowance is determined by management based upon
an evaluation and review of the loan portfolio, consideration of
historical loan loss experience, current economic conditions,
changes in the composition of the loan portfolio, analysis of
collateral values and other pertinent factors.
Loans are measured for impairment when it is probable that all
amounts, including principal and interest, will not be collected
in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement.
The amount of impairment and any subsequent changes are recorded
through the provision for credit losses as an adjustment to the
allowance for loan losses. Accounting standards require that an
impaired loan be measured based on:
|
|
1.
|
the present value of the expected future cash flows, discounted
at the loans effective interest rate; or
|
|
2.
|
the loans observable fair value; or
|
|
3.
|
the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is
collateral-dependent.
|
The Bank follows the Interagency Policy Statement on
the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and analyzes
the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis. In addition,
as an integral part of the quarterly credit review process of
the Bank, the allowance for loan losses and allowance for
off-balance sheet items are reviewed for adequacy. The
California Department of Financial Institutions
(DFI)
and/or the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System require the
Bank to recognize additions to the allowance for loan losses
based upon their assessment of the information available to them
at the time of their examinations.
56
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 1
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting
Policies (Continued)
|
Other
Real Estate Owned
Assets acquired through or instead of loan foreclosure are
initially recorded at fair value less costs to sell when
acquired, establishing a new cost basis. If fair value declines
subsequent to foreclosure, a valuation allowance is recorded
through expense. Operating costs after acquisition are expensed.
Premises
and Equipment
Premises and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated
depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed on the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
various classes of assets. The ranges of useful lives for the
principal classes of assets are as follows:
|
|
|
Buildings and Improvements
|
|
10 to 30 years
|
Furniture and Equipment
|
|
Two to Seven Years
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
|
Term of Lease or Useful Life, Whichever is Shorter
|
Software
|
|
Three Years
|
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
We account for long-lived assets in accordance with the
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. This
Statement requires that long-lived assets and certain
identifiable intangibles be reviewed for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of
assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the
carrying amount of an asset to future net undiscounted cash
flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are
considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is
measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the
assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be
disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or
fair value less costs to sell.
Servicing
Assets
Servicing assets are recorded at the lower of amortized cost or
fair value in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
Liabilities. The fair values of servicing assets
represent either the price paid if purchased, or the allocated
carrying amounts based on relative values when retained in a
sale. Servicing assets are amortized in proportion to, and over
the period of, estimated net servicing income. The fair value of
servicing assets is determined based on the present value of
estimated net future cash flows related to contractually
specified servicing fees.
Upon sales of such loans, we receive a fee for servicing the
loans. The servicing asset is recorded based on the present
value of the contractually specified servicing fee, net of
adequate compensation, for the estimated life of the loan,
discounted by a rate in the range of 11 percent to
12 percent and a constant prepayment rate ranging from
6 percent to 16 percent. The servicing asset is
amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated
servicing income. Management periodically evaluates the
servicing asset for impairment. Impairment, if it occurs, is
recognized in a valuation allowance in the period of impairment.
Interest-only strips are recorded based on the present value of
the excess of total servicing fee over the contractually
specified servicing fee for the estimated life of the loan,
calculated using the same assumptions as noted above. Such
interest-only strips are accounted for at their estimated fair
value, with unrealized gains or losses recorded as adjustments
to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
57
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 1
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting
Policies (Continued)
|
Goodwill
We have goodwill, which represents the excess of purchase price
over the fair value of net assets acquired, because of various
business acquisitions. In accordance with
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, goodwill must be recorded at the reporting
unit level. Reporting units are defined as an operating segment.
We have identified one reporting unit our banking
operations. SFAS No. 142 prohibits the amortization of
goodwill, but requires that it be tested for impairment at least
annually (at any time during the year, but at the same time each
year), or more frequently if events or circumstances change,
such as adverse changes in the business climate, that would more
likely than not reduce the reporting units fair value
below its carrying amount.
The impairment test is performed in two phases. The first step
involves comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its
carrying amount, including goodwill. The fair value of the
reporting unit was derived based on a weighted distribution of
values derived from three different approaches: market approach,
market capitalization approach, and income approach. If the fair
value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount,
goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired, thus
the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If the
carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the
second step of the goodwill impairment test shall be performed
to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second
step of the goodwill impairment test, used to measure the amount
of impairment loss, compares the implied fair value of reporting
unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the
carrying amount of reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied
fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss shall be
recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The loss
recognized cannot exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. After
a goodwill impairment loss is recognized, the adjusted carrying
amount of goodwill shall be its new accounting basis. Subsequent
reversal of a previously recognized goodwill impairment loss is
prohibited once the measurement of that loss is completed.
Other
Intangible Assets
Other intangible assets consists of a core deposit intangible
(CDI) and acquired intangible assets arising from
acquisitions, including non-compete agreements, trade names,
carrier relationships, and client/insured relationships. We
amortize the CDI balance using an accelerated method over eight
years. The acquired intangible assets were initially measured at
fair value and then are amortized on the straight-line method
over their estimated useful lives.
As required by SFAS No. 142, we evaluated the useful
lives assigned to other intangible assets and determined that no
change was necessary and amortization expense was not adjusted
for the year ended December 31, 2007. As required by
SFAS No. 142, other intangible assets are assessed for
impairment or recoverability whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be
recoverable. The other intangible assets recoverability analysis
is consistent with our policy for assessing impairment of
long-lived assets.
Federal
Reserve Bank Stock
The Bank is a member of the Federal Reserve Bank of
San Francisco (FRB) and is required to maintain
stock in the FRB based on a specified ratio relative to the
Banks capital. FRB stock is carried at cost and may be
sold back to the FRB at its carrying value. FRB stock is
periodically evaluated for impairment based on ultimate recovery
of par value. Both cash and stock dividends received are
reported as dividend income.
Federal
Home Loan Bank Stock
The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of
San Francisco (FHLB) and is required to own
common stock in the FHLB based upon the Banks balance of
residential mortgage loans and outstanding FHLB advances. FHLB
stock is carried at cost and may be
58
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 1
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting
Policies (Continued)
|
sold back to the FHLB at its carrying value. FHLB stock is
periodically evaluated for impairment based on ultimate recovery
of par value. Both cash and stock dividends received are
reported as dividend income.
Derivative
Instruments
We account for derivatives in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended. Under
SFAS No. 133, all derivatives are recognized on the
balance sheet at their fair values. On the date the derivative
contract is entered into, we designate the derivative as a fair
value hedge or a cash flow hedge. Fair value hedges include
hedges of the fair value of a recognized asset, liability or a
firm commitment. Cash flow hedges include hedges of the
variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a
recognized asset, liability or a forecasted transaction. Changes
in the fair value of derivatives designated as fair value
hedges, along with the change in fair value on the hedged asset,
liability or firm commitment that is attributable to the hedged
risk, are recorded in current period earnings. Changes in the
fair value of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, to the
extent effective as a hedge, are recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings in
the period during which the hedged item affects earnings.
We formally document all relationships between hedging
instruments and hedged items. This documentation includes our
risk management objective and strategy for undertaking various
hedge transactions, as well as how hedge effectiveness and
ineffectiveness will be measured. This process includes linking
derivatives to specific assets and liabilities on the balance
sheet. We also formally assess, both at the hedges
inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that
are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in
offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of hedged items.
When it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective
as a hedge or that it has ceased to be a highly effective hedge,
we discontinue hedge accounting prospectively.
When hedge accounting is discontinued because it is determined
that the derivative no longer qualifies as an effective hedge,
the derivative will continue to be carried on the balance sheet
at its fair value, with changes in its fair value recognized in
current period earnings. For fair value hedges, the formerly
hedged asset or liability will no longer be adjusted for changes
in fair value and any previously recorded adjustments to the
carrying value of the hedged asset or liability will be
amortized in the same manner that the hedged item affects
income. For cash flow hedges, amounts previously recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) will be
reclassified into income as earnings are impacted by the
variability in the cash flows of the hedged item.
If the hedging instrument is terminated early, the derivative is
removed from the balance sheet. Accounting for the adjustments
to the hedged asset or liability or adjustments to accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) are the same as described
above when a derivative no longer qualifies as an effective
hedge.
If the hedged asset or liability is sold or extinguished, the
derivative will continue to be carried on the balance sheet at
its fair value, with changes in its fair value recognized in
current period earnings. The hedged item, including previously
recorded mark-to-market adjustments, is derecognized immediately
as a component of the gain or loss upon disposition.
Bank-Owned
Life Insurance
We have purchased life insurance policies on certain key
executives. Bank-owned life insurance is recorded at the amount
that can be realized under the insurance contract at the balance
sheet date, which is the cash surrender value adjusted for other
charges or other amounts due, if any, that are probable at
settlement.
59
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 1
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting
Policies (Continued)
|
Affordable
Housing Investments
The Bank has invested in limited partnerships formed to develop
and operate affordable housing units for lower income tenants
throughout California. The partnership interests are accounted
for utilizing the equity method of accounting. The costs of the
investments are being amortized on a straight-line method over
the life of related tax credits. If the partnerships cease to
qualify during the compliance period, the credits may be denied
for any period in which the projects are not in compliance and a
portion of the credits previously taken is subject to recapture
with interest. Such investments are recorded in other assets in
the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Junior
Subordinated Debentures
We have established three statutory business trusts that are
wholly-owned subsidiaries of Hanmi Financial: Hanmi Capital
Trust I, Hanmi Capital Trust II and Hanmi Capital
Trust III (collectively, the Trusts). In three
separate private placement transactions, the Trusts issued
variable rate capital securities representing undivided
preferred beneficial interests in the assets of the Trusts.
Hanmi Financial is the owner of all the beneficial interests
represented by the common securities of the Trusts.
FASB Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities (Revised December 2003)
an Interpretation of ARB No. 51, requires that
variable interest entities be consolidated by a company if that
company is subject to a majority of expected losses from the
variable interest entitys activities, or is entitled to
receive a majority of the entitys expected residual
returns, or both. The Trusts are not consolidated and junior
subordinated debt represents liabilities of Hanmi Financial to
the Trusts.
Income
Taxes
We provide for income taxes using the asset and liability
method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities
are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to
differences between financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases
and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates
expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those
temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in
tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes
the enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided when it is
more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred
tax assets will not be realized. As of December 31, 2007
and 2006, no valuation allowance was required.
Share-Based
Compensation
We adopted SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based
Payment, on January 1, 2006 using the
modified prospective method. Under this method,
awards that are granted, modified or settled after
December 31, 2005 are measured and accounted for in
accordance with SFAS No. 123(R). Also under this
method, expense is recognized for services attributed to the
current period for unvested awards that were granted prior to
January 1, 2006, based upon the fair value determined at
the grant date under SFAS No. 123, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation. Prior to the adoption of
SFAS No. 123(R), we accounted for stock compensation
under the intrinsic value method permitted by Accounting
Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and
related interpretations. Accordingly, we previously recognized
no compensation cost for employee stock options that were
granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of the
underlying common stock on the date of grant.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), we applied
APB No. 25 to account for share-based awards. The reported
net income and earnings per share for the year ended
December 31, 2005 has been presented below to reflect the
impact had we been required to
60
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 1
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting
Policies (Continued)
|
recognize compensation cost based on the fair value at the grant
date for stock options, as required under
SFAS No. 123(R). The pro forma amounts are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income As Reported
|
|
$
|
58,229
|
|
Add Share-Based Employee Compensation Expense
Included in Reported Net Income, Net of Related Tax Effects
(Restricted Stock Award)
|
|
|
409
|
|
Deduct Total Share-Based Employee Compensation
Expense Determined Under Fair Value-Based Method for All Awards
Subject to SFAS No. 123, Net of Related Tax Effects
|
|
|
(1,214
|
)
|
|
|
Net
Income Pro Forma
|
|
$
|
57,424
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share As Reported:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.18
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
Earnings Per Share Pro Forma:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.15
|
|
|
|
In November 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Staff Position
No. FAS 123R-3,
Transition Election Related to Accounting for the Tax
Effects of the Share-Based Payment Awards
(FAS 123R-3).
We have adopted the alternative transition method prescribed by
FAS 123R-3
and concluded that we have no pool of tax benefits as of the
adoption date of SFAS No. 123(R).
SFAS No. 123(R) requires that cash flows resulting
from the realization of excess tax benefits recognized on awards
that were fully vested at the time of adoption of
SFAS No. 123(R) be classified as a financing cash
inflow and an operating cash outflow in the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows. Before the adoption of
SFAS No. 123(R), we presented all tax benefits
realized from the exercise of stock options as an operating cash
inflow.
In addition, SFAS No. 123(R) requires that any
unearned compensation related to awards granted prior to the
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) be eliminated against the
appropriate equity accounts. As a result, the presentation of
stockholders equity was revised to reflect the transfer of
the balance previously reported in unearned compensation to
additional paid-in capital.
Earnings
Per Share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed by
dividing earnings available to common shareholders by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the
period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution of
securities that could share in the earnings.
Treasury
Stock
We use the cost method of accounting for treasury stock. The
cost method requires us to record the reacquisition cost of
treasury stock as a deduction from stockholders equity on
the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
61
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 1
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting
Policies (Continued)
|
Use of
Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications were made to the prior years
presentation to conform to the current years presentation.
The following is a summary of securities held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds
|
|
$
|
694
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
694
|
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
940
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
941
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds
|
|
$
|
693
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
693
|
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
967
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
969
|
|
|
|
62
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 2
|
Securities (Continued)
|
The following is a summary of securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government Agency Securities
|
|
$
|
104,893
|
|
|
$
|
277
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
105,089
|
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
|
|
99,332
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
99,198
|
|
Municipal Bonds
|
|
|
69,907
|
|
|
|
1,867
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
71,751
|
|
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
|
|
|
51,881
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
51,418
|
|
Corporate Bonds
|
|
|
18,295
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
18,226
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
3,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
348,233
|
|
|
$
|
2,848
|
|
|
$
|
1,564
|
|
|
$
|
349,517
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government Agency Securities
|
|
$
|
119,768
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,524
|
|
|
$
|
118,244
|
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
|
|
123,614
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
2,185
|
|
|
|
121,608
|
|
Municipal Bonds
|
|
|
69,966
|
|
|
|
1,795
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
71,710
|
|
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
|
|
|
67,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,492
|
|
|
|
66,113
|
|
Corporate Bonds
|
|
|
8,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
7,887
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4,999
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
5,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
394,042
|
|
|
$
|
2,146
|
|
|
$
|
5,576
|
|
|
$
|
390,612
|
|
|
|
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment
securities at December 31, 2007, by contractual maturity,
are shown below. Although mortgage-backed securities and
collateralized mortgage obligations have contractual maturities
through 2037, expected maturities may differ from contractual
maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or
prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available
for Sale
|
|
|
Held to
Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
|
Within One Year
|
|
$
|
65,898
|
|
|
$
|
65,777
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Over One Year Through Five Years
|
|
|
64,033
|
|
|
|
64,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over Five Years Through Ten Years
|
|
|
8,877
|
|
|
|
9,063
|
|
|
|
694
|
|
|
|
694
|
|
Over Ten Years
|
|
|
58,212
|
|
|
|
59,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
|
|
99,332
|
|
|
|
99,198
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
|
|
|
51,881
|
|
|
|
51,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
348,233
|
|
|
$
|
349,517
|
|
|
$
|
940
|
|
|
$
|
941
|
|
|
|
We periodically evaluate our investments for
other-than-temporary impairment. We have investments in
Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) preferred
securities with an aggregate par value of $2.0 million as
of December 31, 2007 and 2006. During the fourth quarter of
2007, based on an evaluation of the length of time and extent to
which the estimated fair value of the CRA preferred securities
had been
63
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 2
|
Securities (Continued)
|
less than their carrying value, and the financial condition and
near-term prospects of the issuers, we recorded an
other-than-temporary impairment charge of $1.1 million to
write down the value of the CRA preferred securities to their
estimated fair value.
Gross unrealized losses on investment securities available for
sale and the estimated fair value of the related securities,
aggregated by investment category and length of time that
individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss
position, were as follows as of December 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding
Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months
or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
|
Available
for Sale December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government Agency Securities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
46,895
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
46,895
|
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
5,319
|
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
42,143
|
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
47,462
|
|
Municipal Bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
2,910
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
2,910
|
|
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
40,167
|
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
40,167
|
|
Corporate Bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
7,834
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
7,834
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
2,910
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
2,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
5,319
|
|
|
$
|
1,533
|
|
|
$
|
142,859
|
|
|
$
|
1,564
|
|
|
$
|
148,178
|
|
|
|
Available
for Sale December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government Agency Securities
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
9,979
|
|
|
$
|
1,503
|
|
|
$
|
108,265
|
|
|
$
|
1,524
|
|
|
$
|
118,244
|
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
19,442
|
|
|
|
2,064
|
|
|
|
87,966
|
|
|
|
2,185
|
|
|
|
107,408
|
|
Municipal Bonds
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
961
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
4,290
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
5,251
|
|
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
7,196
|
|
|
|
1,394
|
|
|
|
58,917
|
|
|
|
1,492
|
|
|
|
66,113
|
|
Corporate Bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
7,887
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
7,887
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
2,879
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
2,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
243
|
|
|
$
|
37,578
|
|
|
$
|
5,333
|
|
|
$
|
270,204
|
|
|
$
|
5,576
|
|
|
$
|
307,782
|
|
|
|
The impairment losses described previously are not included in
the table above as the impairment loss was recorded. All other
individual securities that have been in a continuous unrealized
loss position for 12 months or longer at December 31,
2007 and 2006 had investment grade ratings upon purchase. The
issuers of these securities have not established any cause for
default on these securities and the various rating agencies have
reaffirmed these securities long-term investment grade
status at December 31, 2007 and 2006. These securities have
fluctuated in value since their purchase dates as market
interest rates have fluctuated. However, we have the ability,
and management intends to hold these securities until their fair
values recover to cost. Therefore, in managements opinion,
all securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss
position for the past 12 months or longer as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006 are not other-than-temporarily
impaired, and therefore, no additional impairment charges as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006 are warranted.
Securities with carrying values of $240.4 million and
$282.5 million as of December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits and for
other purposes as required or permitted by law.
64
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 2
|
Securities (Continued)
|
There were $0, $2,000 and $117,000 in net realized gains on
sales of securities available for sale during the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. In 2007,
$2.7 million ($2.0 million, net of tax) of unrealized
gains arose during the year and were included in comprehensive
income. In 2006, $254,000 ($184,000, net of tax) of unrealized
losses arose during the year and were included in comprehensive
income and $4,000 ($3,000, net of tax) of previously unrealized
gains were realized in earnings. In 2005, $3.6 million
($2.6 million, net of tax) of unrealized losses arose
during the year and were included in comprehensive income and
$114,000 ($83,000, net of tax) of previously unrealized gains
were realized in earnings.
|
|
Note 3
|
Loans
Receivable
|
Loans receivable consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Property
|
|
$
|
795,675
|
|
|
$
|
757,428
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
215,857
|
|
|
|
202,207
|
|
Residential Property
|
|
|
90,065
|
|
|
|
81,128
|
|
|
|
Total Real Estate Loans
|
|
|
1,101,597
|
|
|
|
1,040,763
|
|
|
|
Commercial and Industrial Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Term Loans
|
|
|
1,599,853
|
|
|
|
1,202,612
|
|
Commercial Lines of Credit
|
|
|
256,978
|
|
|
|
225,630
|
|
International Loans
|
|
|
119,360
|
|
|
|
126,561
|
|
SBA Loans
|
|
|
112,503
|
|
|
|
148,391
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial and Industrial Loans
|
|
|
2,088,694
|
|
|
|
1,703,194
|
|
|
|
Consumer Loans
|
|
|
90,449
|
|
|
|
100,121
|
|
|
|
Total Gross Loans
|
|
|
3,280,740
|
|
|
|
2,844,078
|
|
Allowance for Loans Losses
|
|
|
(43,611
|
)
|
|
|
(27,557
|
)
|
Deferred Loan Fees
|
|
|
(2,367
|
)
|
|
|
(3,001
|
)
|
|
|
Loans
Receivable, Net
|
|
$
|
3,234,762
|
|
|
$
|
2,813,520
|
|
|
|
65
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 3
|
Loans
Receivable (Continued)
|
Activity in the allowance for loan losses and allowance for
off-balance sheet items was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and
for the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for
Off-
|
|
|
|
|
|
for
Off-
|
|
|
|
|
|
for
Off-
|
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
for
Loan
|
|
|
Sheet
|
|
|
for
Loan
|
|
|
Sheet
|
|
|
for
Loan
|
|
|
Sheet
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Items
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Items
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Items
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Year
|
|
$
|
27,557
|
|
|
$
|
2,130
|
|
|
$
|
24,963
|
|
|
$
|
2,130
|
|
|
$
|
22,702
|
|
|
$
|
1,800
|
|
Provision Charged to Operating Expense
|
|
|
38,688
|
|
|
|
(365
|
)
|
|
|
7,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,065
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
Loans Charged Off
|
|
|
(23,330
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,129
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,198
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
End of Year
|
|
$
|
43,611
|
|
|
$
|
1,765
|
|
|
$
|
27,557
|
|
|
$
|
2,130
|
|
|
$
|
24,963
|
|
|
$
|
2,130
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of interest foregone on impaired
loans for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income That Would Have Been Recognized Had Impaired
Loans Performed in Accordance With Their Original Terms
|
|
$
|
4,672
|
|
|
$
|
1,726
|
|
|
$
|
957
|
|
Less: Interest Income Recognized on Impaired Loans
|
|
|
(3,705
|
)
|
|
|
(1,146
|
)
|
|
|
(603
|
)
|
|
|
Interest
Foregone on Impaired Loans
|
|
$
|
967
|
|
|
$
|
580
|
|
|
$
|
354
|
|
|
|
The following table provides information on impaired loans for
the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and
for the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded Investment With Related Allowance
|
|
$
|
38,930
|
|
|
$
|
10,616
|
|
|
$
|
7,548
|
|
Recorded Investment With No Related Allowance
|
|
|
15,202
|
|
|
|
3,868
|
|
|
|
3,235
|
|
Allowance on Impaired Loans
|
|
|
(11,829
|
)
|
|
|
(6,731
|
)
|
|
|
(4,991
|
)
|
|
|
Net Recorded
Investment in Impaired Loans
|
|
$
|
42,303
|
|
|
$
|
7,753
|
|
|
$
|
5,792
|
|
|
|
Average Total Recorded Investment in Impaired Loans
|
|
$
|
61,249
|
|
|
$
|
19,287
|
|
|
$
|
14,340
|
|
|
|
There were no commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers
whose loans are included above.
Loans on non-accrual status totaled $54.3 million and
$14.2 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. Loans past due 90 days or more and still
accruing interest totaled $227,000 and $2,000 at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. There were no
restructured loans at December 31, 2007 and 2006.
66
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 4
|
Servicing
Assets
|
Changes in servicing assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Year
|
|
$
|
4,579
|
|
|
$
|
3,910
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
1,821
|
|
|
|
2,331
|
|
Valuation Write-Down
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(355
|
)
|
Amortization
|
|
|
(2,046
|
)
|
|
|
(1,307
|
)
|
|
|
Balance at
End of Year
|
|
$
|
4,336
|
|
|
$
|
4,579
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007 and 2006, we serviced loans sold to
unaffiliated parties in the amounts of $258.5 million and
$236.0 million, respectively. All of the loans being
serviced were SBA loans.
|
|
Note 5
|
Premises and
Equipment
|
The following is a summary of the major components of premises
and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
6,120
|
|
|
$
|
6,120
|
|
Buildings and Improvements
|
|
|
8,433
|
|
|
|
8,210
|
|
Furniture and Equipment
|
|
|
13,783
|
|
|
|
12,202
|
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
|
|
10,141
|
|
|
|
8,403
|
|
Software
|
|
|
862
|
|
|
|
862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,339
|
|
|
|
35,797
|
|
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
(18,539
|
)
|
|
|
(15,722
|
)
|
|
|
Total
Premises and Equipment, Net
|
|
$
|
20,800
|
|
|
$
|
20,075
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense totaled $3.0 million,
$2.9 million and $2.7 million for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
67
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, goodwill totaled
$107.1 million and $207.6 million, respectively. The
change in goodwill during the year is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and
for the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Year
|
|
$
|
207,646
|
|
|
$
|
209,058
|
|
Acquired Goodwill
|
|
|
2,345
|
|
|
|
(1,412
|
)
|
Impairment Loss on Goodwill
|
|
|
(102,891
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
End of Year
|
|
$
|
107,100
|
|
|
$
|
207,646
|
|
|
|
Acquired
Goodwill
In January 2007, the acquisitions of Chun-Ha and All World
resulted in the recognition of goodwill aggregating
$2.3 million. In 2006, goodwill decreased by
$1.4 million due to a tax refund related to the acquisition
of Pacific Union Bank (PUB).
Impairment
Loss on Goodwill
During our annual assessment of goodwill during the fourth
quarter of 2007, we concluded that we had an impairment of
goodwill based on the decline in the market value of our common
stock, which we believe reflects, in part, recent turmoil in the
financial markets that has adversely affected the market value
of the common stock of many banks. The fair value was determined
based on a weighted distribution of values derived from three
different approaches: market approach, market capitalization
approach, and income approach. We concluded that
$102.9 million of the goodwill was impaired and was
required to be expensed as a non-cash charge to continuing
operations during the fourth quarter of 2007.
|
|
Note 7
|
Other
Intangible Assets
|
Other intangible assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2007
|
|
|
December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
Other Intangible Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Deposit Intangible
|
|
|
8 years
|
|
|
$
|
11,385
|
|
|
$
|
(7,113
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,385
|
|
|
$
|
(5,073
|
)
|
Trade Names
|
|
|
20 years
|
|
|
|
970
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Client/Insured Relationships
|
|
|
10 years
|
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Compete Agreements
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrier Relationships
|
|
|
15 years
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other
Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,305
|
|
|
$
|
(7,397
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,385
|
|
|
$
|
(5,073
|
)
|
|
|
The weighted-average amortization period for other intangible
assets is 9.1 years. The total amortization expense for
other intangible assets was $2.3 million, $2.4 million
and $2.8 million during the years ended December 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
68
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 7
|
Other
Intangible
Assets (Continued)
|
Estimated future amortization expense related to other
intangible assets for each of the next five years is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ending
|
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
1,959
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
1,568
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
1,149
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
700
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
198
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, management is not aware
of any circumstances that would indicate impairment of other
intangible assets. There were no impairment charges recorded
through earnings in 2007 or 2006.
Time deposits by maturity were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than Three Months
|
|
$
|
1,141,872
|
|
|
$
|
811,211
|
|
After Three Months to Six Months
|
|
|
379,806
|
|
|
|
516,473
|
|
After Six Months to Twelve Months
|
|
|
251,352
|
|
|
|
340,856
|
|
After Twelve Months
|
|
|
9,482
|
|
|
|
10,306
|
|
|
|
Total Time
Deposits
|
|
$
|
1,782,512
|
|
|
$
|
1,678,846
|
|
|
|
For time deposits having a remaining term of more than one year,
the aggregate amount of maturities for each of the five years
following the balance sheet date are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ending
|
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
8,720
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
620
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
|
69
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 8
|
Deposits (Continued)
|
A summary of interest expense on deposits was as follows for the
periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Savings
|
|
$
|
2,004
|
|
|
$
|
1,853
|
|
|
$
|
2,130
|
|
Money Market Checking and NOW Accounts
|
|
|
15,446
|
|
|
|
14,539
|
|
|
|
12,964
|
|
Time Deposits of $100,000 or More
|
|
|
75,516
|
|
|
|
64,184
|
|
|
|
31,984
|
|
Other Time Deposits
|
|
|
15,134
|
|
|
|
12,460
|
|
|
|
7,114
|
|
|
|
Total
Interest Expense on Deposits
|
|
$
|
108,100
|
|
|
$
|
93,036
|
|
|
$
|
54,192
|
|
|
|
Total deposits reclassified to loans due to overdrafts at
December 31, 2007 and 2006 were $6.3 million and
$4.3 million, respectively.
|
|
Note 9
|
FHLB
Advances and Other Borrowings
|
FHLB advances and other borrowings consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB Advances
|
|
$
|
432,664
|
|
|
$
|
168,107
|
|
Federal Funds Purchased
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note Issued to U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
Total FHLB
Advances and Other Borrowings
|
|
$
|
487,164
|
|
|
$
|
169,037
|
|
|
|
FHLB advances represent collateralized obligations with the
FHLB. The following is a summary of contractual maturities
pertaining to FHLB advances:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
415,000
|
|
|
|
4.72
|
%
|
2009
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
5.63
|
%
|
2010
|
|
|
7,084
|
|
|
|
4.44
|
%
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
4,580
|
|
|
|
5.27
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
432,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 9
|
FHLB
Advances and Other
Borrowings (Continued)
|
All of the FHLB advances had fixed interest rates. The
following is financial data pertaining to FHLB advances:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Interest Rate at End of Year
|
|
|
4.73
|
%
|
|
|
5.20
|
%
|
|
|
4.33
|
%
|
Weighted-Average Interest Rate During the Year
|
|
|
5.11
|
%
|
|
|
5.02
|
%
|
|
|
3.70
|
%
|
Average Balance of FHLB Advances
|
|
$
|
237,733
|
|
|
$
|
123,295
|
|
|
$
|
74,437
|
|
Maximum Amount Outstanding at Any Month-End
|
|
$
|
432,664
|
|
|
$
|
168,250
|
|
|
$
|
100,700
|
|
|
|
We have pledged investment securities available for sale and
loans receivable with carrying values of $10.0 million and
$1,278.6 million, respectively, as collateral with the FHLB
for this borrowing facility. The total borrowing capacity
available from the collateral that has been pledged is
$714.6 million, of which $281.8 million remained
available as of December 31, 2007.
For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
interest expense on FHLB advances and other borrowings totaled
$13.9 million, $7.0 million and $3.0 million,
respectively, and the weighted-average interest rates were
5.10 percent, 5.02 percent and 3.63 percent,
respectively.
Total credit lines for borrowing amounted to $186.0 million
and $158.0 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. As of December 31, 2007, $50.0 million
was borrowed under these credit lines. At December 31,
2006, there were no borrowings under these credit lines.
|
|
Note 10
|
Junior
Subordinated Debentures
|
During the first half of 2004, we issued two junior subordinated
notes bearing interest at the three-month London InterBank
Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 2.90 percent totaling
$61.8 million and one junior subordinated note bearing
interest at the three-month LIBOR plus 2.63 percent
totaling $20.6 million. The securities have a floating
rate, which resets quarterly. Under the terms of the
transactions, the securities will mature in 2034 and are
redeemable, in whole or in part, without penalty, at the option
of Hanmi Financial after five years. The outstanding
subordinated debentures related to these offerings, the proceeds
of which financed the purchase of PUB, totaled
$82.4 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006.
For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
interest expense on the junior subordinated debentures totaled
$6.6 million, $6.4 million and $4.9 million,
respectively, and the weighted-average interest rates were
8.06 percent, 7.79 percent and 5.95 percent,
respectively.
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN No. 48). FIN No. 48
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in an enterprises financial statements and
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attributes of
income tax positions taken or expected to betaken on a tax
return. Under FIN No. 48, the impact of an uncertain
tax position taken or expected to be taken on an income tax
return must be recognized in the financial statements at the
largest amount that is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon
audit by the relevant taxing authority. An uncertain income tax
position will not be recognized in the financial statements
unless it is more likely than not of being sustained.
71
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 11
|
Income
Taxes (Continued)
|
We adopted the provisions of FIN No. 48 on January 1,
2007, and there was no material effect on the consolidated
financial statements as of the date of adoption. Because of the
implementation, there was no cumulative effect related to
adopting FIN No. 48. However, certain amounts have
been reclassified in the Consolidated Balance Sheets in order to
comply with the requirements of FIN No. 48.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of
unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized Tax Benefits at January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
794
|
|
Gross Increases for Tax Positions of Prior Years
|
|
|
40
|
|
Gross Decreases for Tax Positions of Prior Years
|
|
|
|
|
Increases in Tax Positions for Current Year
|
|
|
198
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
|
|
Lapse in Statute of Limitations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized Tax Benefits at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
1,032
|
|
|
|
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would affect
our effective tax rate if recognized is $141,000 as of
December 31, 2007 and $115,000 as of January 1, 2007.
During 2007, we accrued interest of $52,000 for uncertain tax
benefits. As of December 31, 2007, the total amount of
accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions, net of
Federal tax benefit, is $96,000. We account for interest and
penalties related to uncertain tax positions as part of our
provision for Federal and state income taxes. Accrued interest
and penalties are included within the related tax liability line
in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Unrecognized tax benefits primarily include state exposures from
California Enterprise Zone interest deductions and income tax
treatment for prior business acquisition costs. We believe that
it is reasonably possible that certain remaining unrecognized
tax positions, each of which are individually insignificant, may
be recognized by the end of 2008 because of a lapse of the
statute of limitations. We anticipate an insignificant net
change in the unrecognized tax benefits related to prior
business acquisition costs, which will increase due to
additional unrecognized tax benefits and decrease due to the
lapse of the statute of limitations during 2008. We do not
anticipate any material change in the total amount of
unrecognized tax benefits to occur within the next twelve months.
We are currently open to audit under the statute of limitations
by the Internal Revenue Service for the years ended
December 31, 2004 through 2006. Hanmi Financial Corporation
and its subsidiaries state income tax returns are open to
audit under the statute of limitations by various state tax
authorities for the years ended December 31, 2003 through
2006. We are currently not under any audit by the Internal
Revenue Service or state tax authorities.
72
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 11
|
Income
Taxes (Continued)
|
A summary of the provision for income taxes is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Current Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
30,209
|
|
|
$
|
34,471
|
|
|
$
|
29,779
|
|
State
|
|
|
8,886
|
|
|
|
9,059
|
|
|
|
9,383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,095
|
|
|
|
43,530
|
|
|
|
39,162
|
|
|
|
Deferred Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(10,791
|
)
|
|
|
(2,222
|
)
|
|
|
(2,350
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
(3,827
|
)
|
|
|
(720
|
)
|
|
|
(357
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,618
|
)
|
|
|
(2,942
|
)
|
|
|
(2,707
|
)
|
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
$
|
24,477
|
|
|
$
|
40,588
|
|
|
$
|
36,455
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Loss Provision
|
|
$
|
20,800
|
|
|
$
|
13,608
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
1,729
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
State Taxes
|
|
|
1,594
|
|
|
|
2,672
|
|
Unrealized Loss on Securities Available for Sale, Interest-Only
Strips and Interest Rate Swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,450
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,133
|
|
|
|
637
|
|
|
|
Total Deferred Tax Assets
|
|
|
26,256
|
|
|
|
19,655
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Accounting
|
|
|
(5,464
|
)
|
|
|
(5,329
|
)
|
Unrealized Gain on Securities Available for Sale, Interest-Only
Strips and Interest Rate Swaps
|
|
|
(527
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(1,795
|
)
|
|
|
(1,262
|
)
|
|
|
Total Deferred Tax Liabilities
|
|
|
(7,786
|
)
|
|
|
(6,591
|
)
|
|
|
Net Deferred Tax Assets
|
|
$
|
18,470
|
|
|
$
|
13,064
|
|
|
|
Management believes that it is more likely than not that the
results of future operations will generate sufficient taxable
income to realize the deferred tax assets, net of the valuation
allowance.
73
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 11
|
Income
Taxes (Continued)
|
A reconciliation of the difference between the Federal statutory
income tax rate and the effective tax rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Federal Statutory Income Tax Rate
|
|
|
(35.0
|
)%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State Taxes, Net of Federal Tax Benefits
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
Tax-Exempt Municipal Securities
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
Other
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
Impairment Loss on Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective Tax Rate
|
|
|
67.9
|
%
|
|
|
38.2
|
%
|
|
|
38.5
|
%
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007, net current taxes receivable of
$5.6 million were included in other assets in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2006, net
current taxes payable of $1.0 million were included in
other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
|
|
Note 12
|
Employee
Share-Based Compensation
|
At December 31, 2007, we had one incentive plan, the 2007
Equity Compensation Plan (the Plan), which replaced
the Year 2000 Stock Option Plan. The 2004 CEO Stock Option Plan
(the CEO Plan) was terminated on December 31,
2007. The Plan provides for grants of non-qualified and
incentive stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation
rights and performance shares to non-employee directors,
officers, employees and consultants of Hanmi Financial and its
subsidiaries. The CEO Plan had provided for the grant of stock
options and restricted stock to our former Chief Executive
Officer.
2007
Equity Compensation Plan
Under the Plan, we may grant equity incentive awards for up to
3,000,000 shares of common stock. As of December 31,
2007, 2,879,000 shares were still available for issuance.
All stock options granted under the Plan have an exercise price
equal to the fair market value of the underlying common stock on
the date of grant. Stock options granted under the Plan
generally vest based on five years of continuous service and
expire ten years from the date of grant. Certain option and
share awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a
change in control (as defined in the Plan). New shares of common
stock may be issued or treasury shares may be utilized upon the
exercise of stock options.
The weighted-average estimated fair value per share of options
granted under the Plan was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Estimated Fair Value Per Share of Options
Granted
|
|
$
|
4.49
|
|
|
$
|
6.23
|
|
|
$
|
4.96
|
|
|
|
74
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 12
|
Employee
Share-Based
Compensation (Continued)
|
The weighted-average fair value per share of options granted was
estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with the following weighted-average
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend Yield
|
|
|
1.68
|
%
|
|
|
1.26
|
%
|
|
|
1.18
|
%
|
Expected Volatility
|
|
|
29.98
|
%
|
|
|
34.79
|
%
|
|
|
32.62
|
%
|
Expected Term
|
|
|
4.9 years
|
|
|
|
4.6 years
|
|
|
|
4.1 years
|
|
Risk-Free Interest Rate
|
|
|
4.29
|
%
|
|
|
4.85
|
%
|
|
|
4.13
|
%
|
|
|
Expected volatility is determined based on the historical weekly
volatility of our stock price over a period equal to the
expected term of the options granted. The expected term of the
options represents the period that options granted are expected
to be outstanding based primarily on the historical exercise
behavior associated with previous option grants. The risk-free
interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve at
the time of grant for a period equal to the expected term of the
options granted.
The following information under the Plan is presented for the
periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair Value of Options Granted
|
|
$
|
596
|
|
|
$
|
5,940
|
|
|
$
|
672
|
|
Fair Value of Options Vested
|
|
$
|
1,590
|
|
|
$
|
695
|
|
|
$
|
905
|
|
Total Intrinsic Value of Options
Exercised(1)
|
|
$
|
1,197
|
|
|
$
|
2,874
|
|
|
$
|
4,487
|
|
Cash Received from Options Exercised
|
|
$
|
1,145
|
|
|
$
|
2,032
|
|
|
$
|
2,093
|
|
Actual Tax Benefit Realized from Tax Deductions on Options
Exercised
|
|
$
|
317
|
|
|
$
|
661
|
|
|
$
|
729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Intrinsic
value represents the difference between the closing stock price
on the exercise date and the exercise price, multiplied by the
number of options. |
The following is a summary of transactions under the Plan for
the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Price
Per
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Price
Per
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per
Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding at Beginning of Year
|
|
|
1,755,813
|
|
|
$
|
15.31
|
|
|
|
1,173,712
|
|
|
$
|
10.55
|
|
|
|
1,618,836
|
|
|
$
|
9.33
|
|
Options Granted
|
|
|
132,667
|
|
|
$
|
15.05
|
|
|
|
953,000
|
|
|
$
|
19.17
|
|
|
|
135,554
|
|
|
$
|
17.10
|
|
Options Exercised
|
|
|
(130,647
|
)
|
|
$
|
8.76
|
|
|
|
(257,759
|
)
|
|
$
|
7.88
|
|
|
|
(391,094
|
)
|
|
$
|
6.44
|
|
Options Forfeited
|
|
|
(256,267
|
)
|
|
$
|
18.22
|
|
|
|
(111,540
|
)
|
|
$
|
15.39
|
|
|
|
(189,584
|
)
|
|
$
|
13.26
|
|
Options Expired
|
|
|
(28,800
|
)
|
|
$
|
16.90
|
|
|
|
(1,600
|
)
|
|
$
|
14.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding at End of Year
|
|
|
1,472,766
|
|
|
$
|
15.33
|
|
|
|
1,755,813
|
|
|
$
|
15.31
|
|
|
|
1,173,712
|
|
|
$
|
10.55
|
|
|
|
Options Exercisable at End of Year
|
|
|
617,634
|
|
|
$
|
12.48
|
|
|
|
471,903
|
|
|
$
|
8.55
|
|
|
|
520,602
|
|
|
$
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
75
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 12
|
Employee
Share-Based
Compensation (Continued)
|
The following is a summary of transactions for non-vested stock
options under the Plan for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Grant
Date
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Grant
Date
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Grant
Date
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per
Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per
Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per
Share
|
|
|
|
Non-Vested Options Outstanding at Beginning of Year
|
|
|
1,283,910
|
|
|
$
|
5.53
|
|
|
|
653,110
|
|
|
$
|
3.68
|
|
|
|
1,131,594
|
|
|
$
|
2.93
|
|
Options Granted
|
|
|
132,667
|
|
|
$
|
4.49
|
|
|
|
953,000
|
|
|
$
|
6.23
|
|
|
|
135,554
|
|
|
$
|
4.96
|
|
Options Vested
|
|
|
(305,178
|
)
|
|
$
|
5.21
|
|
|
|
(210,660
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.30
|
|
|
|
(424,454
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.13
|
|
Options Forfeited
|
|
|
(256,267
|
)
|
|
$
|
5.57
|
|
|
|
(111,540
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.90
|
|
|
|
(189,584
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.62
|
|
|
|
Non-Vested Options Outstanding at End of Year
|
|
|
855,132
|
|
|
$
|
5.47
|
|
|
|
1,283,910
|
|
|
$
|
5.53
|
|
|
|
653,110
|
|
|
$
|
3.68
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
compensation expense of $1.1 million, $742,000 and $0 for
the Plan was recognized in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations. As of December 31, 2007, the total compensation
cost not yet recognized under the Plan was $3.9 million
with a weighted-average recognition period of 2.9 years.
As of December 31, 2007, stock options outstanding under
the Plan were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
Outstanding
|
|
|
Options
Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Price
Per
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Price
Per
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
Price
Range
|
|
of
Shares
|
|
|
Value(1)
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
of
Shares
|
|
|
Value(1)
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
$3.27 to $4.99
|
|
|
128,184
|
|
|
$
|
1,105
|
|
|
$
|
3.89
|
|
|
|
2.7 years
|
|
|
|
128,184
|
|
|
$
|
1,105
|
|
|
$
|
3.89
|
|
|
|
2.7 years
|
|
$5.00 to $9.99
|
|
|
121,128
|
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
|
$
|
7.78
|
|
|
|
4.8 years
|
|
|
|
91,128
|
|
|
|
786
|
|
|
$
|
7.21
|
|
|
|
3.1 years
|
|
$10.00 to $14.99
|
|
|
338,900
|
|
|
|
2,921
|
|
|
$
|
13.51
|
|
|
|
6.2 years
|
|
|
|
190,100
|
|
|
|
1,639
|
|
|
$
|
13.51
|
|
|
|
6.2 years
|
|
$15.00 to $19.99
|
|
|
653,554
|
|
|
|
5,634
|
|
|
$
|
17.71
|
|
|
|
8.3 years
|
|
|
|
136,222
|
|
|
|
1,174
|
|
|
$
|
17.81
|
|
|
|
8.1 years
|
|
$20.00 to $21.63
|
|
|
231,000
|
|
|
|
1,991
|
|
|
$
|
21.57
|
|
|
|
8.9 years
|
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
$
|
21.63
|
|
|
|
8.9 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,472,766
|
|
|
$
|
12,695
|
|
|
$
|
15.33
|
|
|
|
7.2 years
|
|
|
|
617,634
|
|
|
$
|
5,324
|
|
|
$
|
12.48
|
|
|
|
7.2 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Intrinsic
value represents the difference between the closing stock price
on the last trading day of the period, which was $8.62 as of
December 31, 2007, and the exercise price, multiplied by
the number of options. |
2004 CEO
Stock Option Plan
The CEO Plan was terminated as of December 31, 2007 and
there were no additional shares available for issuance. There
were no stock options granted under the 2004 CEO Stock Option
Plan during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005.
76
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 12
|
Employee
Share-Based
Compensation (Continued)
|
The following is a summary of transactions under the CEO Plan
for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Price
Per
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Price
Per
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Price
Per
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding at Beginning of Year
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
17.17
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
17.17
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
17.17
|
|
Options Forfeited
|
|
|
(233,334
|
)
|
|
$
|
17.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Options Cancelled
|
|
|
(116,666
|
)
|
|
$
|
17.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding at End of Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
17.17
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
17.17
|
|
|
|
Options Exercisable at End of Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
58,333
|
|
|
$
|
17.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of transactions for non-vested stock
options under the CEO Plan for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Grant
Date
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Grant
Date
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Grant
Date
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per
Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per
Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per
Share
|
|
|
|
Non-Vested Options Outstanding at Beginning of Year
|
|
|
291,667
|
|
|
$
|
4.82
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
4.82
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
4.82
|
|
Options Forfeited
|
|
|
(233,334
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Options Vested
|
|
|
(58,333
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.82
|
|
|
|
(58,333
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Vested Options Outstanding at End of Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
291,667
|
|
|
$
|
4.82
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
4.82
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
compensation expense of $0, $416,000 and $0 for the CEO Plan was
recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Restricted
Stock Awards
During 2007, 19,000 shares of restricted stock were granted
to officers under the Plan. The shares vest 20 percent over
the next five years on the anniversary dates of the grants. The
market value of the shares awarded totaled $256,000. For the
year ended December 31, 2007, compensation expense of
$11,000 related to these restricted stock awards was recognized
in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
In February 2005, 100,000 shares of restricted stock were
granted to our former Chief Executive Officer. 20,000 of these
shares vested immediately, and an additional 20,000 shares
were to vest each year over the next four years on the
anniversary date of the grant. Upon the former Chief Executive
Officers retirement on December 31, 2007, all
unvested restricted stock became immediately vested. The market
value of the shares awarded totaled $1.8 million. For the
years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, compensation
expense of $787,000, $363,000 and $665,000, respectively,
related to the restricted stock award was recognized in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
77
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 13
|
Stockholders
Equity
|
Stock
Warrants
In 2004, we issued stock warrants to affiliates of Castle Creek
Financial LLC for services rendered in connection with the
placement of our equity securities. Under the terms of the
warrants, the warrant holders can purchase 508,558 shares
of common stock at an exercise price of $9.50 per share. The
warrants were immediately exercisable and expire after five
years. During the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005, 2,000, 160,056 and 0 shares of common stock,
respectively, were issued in connection with the exercise of
stock warrants. In June 2007, we repurchased 324,502 stock
warrants at an aggregate cash purchase price of
$2.6 million and such stock warrants were then canceled. As
of December 31, 2007, there were outstanding stock warrants
to purchase 2,000 shares of our common stock.
Repurchase
of Common Stock
In April 2006, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase
of up to $50.0 million of our common stock as part of our
ongoing capital management program. During the year ended
December 31, 2007, 3,469,500 shares of our common
stock were repurchased on the open market for an aggregate
purchase price of $50.0 million. There were no common stock
repurchases in 2006. In August 2005, we repurchased
1,163,000 shares of our common stock from Korea Exchange
Bank for an aggregate purchase price of $20.0 million as
part of our ongoing capital management program. Repurchased
shares are held in treasury pending use for general corporate
purposes, including issuance under our stock option plans.
|
|
Note 14
|
Regulatory
Matters
|
Hanmi Financial and the Bank are subject to various regulatory
capital requirements administered by the Federal banking
regulatory agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital
requirements can initiate certain mandatory and
possibly additional discretionary actions by
regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material
effect on our consolidated financial statements. Under capital
adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action, Hanmi Financial and the Bank must meet
specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures
of the assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items
as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital
amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative
judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings
and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure
capital adequacy require Hanmi Financial and the Bank to
maintain minimum ratios (set forth in the table below) of Total
and Tier 1 Capital (as defined in the regulations) to
Risk-Weighted Assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 Capital
(as defined) to Average Assets (as defined). Management believes
that, as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, Hanmi Financial and
the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they
were subject.
As of December 31, 2007, the most recent notification from
the Federal Reserve Board categorized the Bank as well
capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action. To be categorized as well
capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum Total
Risk-Based, Tier 1 Risk-Based, and Tier 1 Leverage
Ratios as set forth in the table below. There are no conditions
or events since that notification which management believes have
changed the institutions category.
78
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 14
|
Regulatory
Matters (Continued)
|
The capital ratios of Hanmi Financial and Hanmi Bank at
December 31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
Minimum
to Be
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory
|
|
|
Categorized
as
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Requirement
|
|
|
Well
Capitalized
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hanmi Financial
|
|
$
|
380,057
|
|
|
|
10.65
|
%
|
|
$
|
285,417
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Hanmi Bank
|
|
$
|
377,613
|
|
|
|
10.59
|
%
|
|
$
|
285,137
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
356,422
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hanmi Financial
|
|
$
|
335,451
|
|
|
|
9.40
|
%
|
|
$
|
142,708
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Hanmi Bank
|
|
$
|
333,050
|
|
|
|
9.34
|
%
|
|
$
|
142,569
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
213,853
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hanmi Financial
|
|
$
|
335,451
|
|
|
|
8.52
|
%
|
|
$
|
157,513
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Hanmi Bank
|
|
$
|
333,050
|
|
|
|
8.47
|
%
|
|
$
|
157,372
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
196,715
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hanmi Financial
|
|
$
|
384,895
|
|
|
|
12.55
|
%
|
|
$
|
245,408
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Hanmi Bank
|
|
$
|
376,422
|
|
|
|
12.28
|
%
|
|
$
|
245,158
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
306,447
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hanmi Financial
|
|
$
|
355,186
|
|
|
|
11.58
|
%
|
|
$
|
122,704
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Hanmi Bank
|
|
$
|
346,713
|
|
|
|
11.31
|
%
|
|
$
|
122,579
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
183,868
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hanmi Financial
|
|
$
|
355,186
|
|
|
|
10.08
|
%
|
|
$
|
140,947
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Hanmi Bank
|
|
$
|
346,713
|
|
|
|
9.85
|
%
|
|
$
|
140,827
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
176,034
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
The average reserve balance required to be maintained with the
FRB was $1.5 million as of December 31, 2007 and 2006.
Memorandum
of Understanding
On July 20, 2005, following a joint regular examination by
the FRB and the DFI, the Banks Board of Directors approved
and signed an informal memorandum of understanding
(Memorandum) in connection with certain deficiencies
identified by the regulators relating to the Banks
compliance with certain provisions of the Bank Secrecy Act and
anti-money laundering regulations. On December 21, 2006,
following a joint examination by the FRB and the DFI, the
Memorandum was terminated.
79
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 15
|
Earnings
(Loss) Per Share
|
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and
denominators of the basic and diluted per share computations for
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
|
|
(Numerator)
|
|
|
(Denominator)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS Income Available to Common Shareholders
|
|
$
|
(60,520
|
)
|
|
|
47,787,213
|
|
|
$
|
(1.27
|
)
|
Effect of Dilutive Securities Options and Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS Income Available to Common Shareholders
|
|
$
|
(60,520
|
)
|
|
|
47,787,213
|
|
|
$
|
(1.27
|
)
|
|
|
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS Income Available to Common Shareholders
|
|
$
|
65,649
|
|
|
|
48,850,221
|
|
|
$
|
1.34
|
|
Effect of Dilutive Securities Options and Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
584,907
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
Diluted EPS Income Available to Common Shareholders
|
|
$
|
65,649
|
|
|
|
49,435,128
|
|
|
$
|
1.33
|
|
|
|
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS Income Available to Common Shareholders
|
|
$
|
58,229
|
|
|
|
49,174,885
|
|
|
$
|
1.18
|
|
Effect of Dilutive Securities Options and Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
767,471
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
Diluted EPS Income Available to Common Shareholders
|
|
$
|
58,229
|
|
|
|
49,942,356
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, there
were 1,493,766, 1,373,554 and 50,554 options and warrants
outstanding, respectively, that were not included in the
computation of diluted EPS because of a net loss or their
exercise price was greater than the average market price of the
common shares and, therefore, the effect would be anti-dilutive.
|
|
Note 16
|
Employee
Benefits
|
401(k)
Plan
We have a Section 401(k) plan for the benefit of
substantially all of our employees. We match 75 percent of
participant contributions to the 401(k) plan up to
8 percent of each 401(k) plan participants annual
compensation. We made contributions to the 401(k) plan for the
years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 of
$1.2 million, $1.0 million and $918,000, respectively.
Bank-Owned
Life Insurance
In 2001 and 2004, we purchased single premium life insurance
policies called bank-owned life insurance covering certain
officers. The Bank is the beneficiary under the policy. In the
event of the death of a covered officer, we will receive the
specified insurance benefit from the insurance carrier.
Deferred
Compensation Plan
Effective November 1, 2006, the Board of Directors approved
the Hanmi Financial Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan
(the DCP). The DCP is a non-qualified deferred
compensation program for directors and certain key employees
whereby they may defer a portion of annual compensation for
payment upon retirement of the amount deferred plus a guaranteed
return. The DCP is unfunded. As of December 31, 2007 and
2006, the liability for the deferred compensation plan and
interest thereon was $188,000 and $112,000, respectively.
80
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 17
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
We lease our premises under non-cancelable operating leases. At
December 31, 2007, future minimum annual rental commitments
under these non-cancelable operating leases, with initial or
remaining terms of one year or more, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ending
|
|
Amount
|
|
December
31,
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
2,906
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2,864
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2,645
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,494
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,190
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
5,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,278
|
|
|
|
Rental expenses recorded under such leases in 2007, 2006 and
2005 amounted to $4.8 million, $4.1 million and
$3.4 million, respectively.
In the normal course of business, we are involved in various
legal claims. Management has reviewed all legal claims against
us with in-house or outside legal counsel and has taken into
consideration the views of such counsel as to the outcome of the
claims. In managements opinion, the final disposition of
all such claims will not have a material adverse effect on our
financial position or results of operations.
|
|
Note 18
|
Off-Balance
Sheet Commitments
|
We are a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet
risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing
needs of our customers. These financial instruments include
commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit.
These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of
credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized
in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Banks exposure to
credit losses in the event of non-performance by the other party
to commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is
represented by the contractual notional amount of those
instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making
commitments and conditional obligations as it does for extending
loan facilities to customers. The Bank evaluates each
customers creditworthiness on a
case-by-case
basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by
the Bank upon extension of credit, is based on managements
credit evaluation of the counterparty.
Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable;
inventory; property, plant and equipment; and income-producing
or borrower-occupied properties. The following table shows the
distribution of undisbursed loan commitments as of the dates
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Commitments to Extend Credit
|
|
$
|
524,349
|
|
|
$
|
578,347
|
|
Commercial Letters of Credit
|
|
|
52,544
|
|
|
|
65,158
|
|
Standby Letters of Credit
|
|
|
48,071
|
|
|
|
48,289
|
|
Unused Credit Card Lines
|
|
|
18,622
|
|
|
|
17,031
|
|
|
|
Total Undisbursed Loan Commitments
|
|
$
|
643,586
|
|
|
$
|
708,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 19
|
Fair Value
of Financial Instruments
|
The estimated fair value of financial instruments has been
determined by using available market information and appropriate
valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is
required to interpret market data in order to develop estimates
of fair value.
81
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 19
|
Fair Value
of Financial
Instruments (Continued)
|
Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily
indicative of the amounts that we could realize in a current
market exchange. The use of different market assumptions
and/or
estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the
estimated fair value amounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2007
|
|
|
December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
or
Contract
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
or
Contract
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
$
|
122,398
|
|
|
$
|
122,398
|
|
|
$
|
138,501
|
|
|
$
|
138,501
|
|
Term Federal Funds Sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
Securities Held to Maturity
|
|
|
940
|
|
|
|
941
|
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
969
|
|
Securities Available for Sale
|
|
|
349,517
|
|
|
|
349,517
|
|
|
|
390,612
|
|
|
|
390,612
|
|
Loans Receivable, Net
|
|
|
3,234,762
|
|
|
|
3,232,165
|
|
|
|
2,813,520
|
|
|
|
2,834,864
|
|
Loans Held for Sale
|
|
|
6,335
|
|
|
|
6,335
|
|
|
|
23,870
|
|
|
|
23,870
|
|
Accrued Interest Receivable
|
|
|
17,500
|
|
|
|
17,500
|
|
|
|
16,919
|
|
|
|
16,919
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank Stock
|
|
|
11,733
|
|
|
|
11,733
|
|
|
|
11,733
|
|
|
|
11,733
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
|
|
|
21,746
|
|
|
|
21,746
|
|
|
|
13,189
|
|
|
|
13,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-Bearing Deposits
|
|
|
680,282
|
|
|
|
680,282
|
|
|
|
728,347
|
|
|
|
728,347
|
|
Interest-Bearing Deposits
|
|
|
2,321,417
|
|
|
|
2,323,199
|
|
|
|
2,216,368
|
|
|
|
2,216,757
|
|
FHLB Advances, Other Borrowings and Junior Subordinated
Debentures
|
|
|
569,570
|
|
|
|
571,913
|
|
|
|
251,443
|
|
|
|
254,058
|
|
Accrued Interest Payable
|
|
|
21,828
|
|
|
|
21,828
|
|
|
|
22,582
|
|
|
|
22,582
|
|
OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ITEMS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to Extend Credit
|
|
|
524,349
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
578,347
|
|
|
|
1,786
|
|
Standby Letters of Credit
|
|
|
48,071
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
48,289
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
The methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of
each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable
to estimate that value are explained below:
Cash and Cash Equivalents The carrying
amounts approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of
these instruments.
Term Federal Funds Sold The carrying
amounts approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of
these instruments.
Securities The fair value of
securities is generally obtained from market bids for similar or
identical securities or obtained from independent securities
brokers or dealers.
Loans Fair values are estimated for
portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics,
primarily fixed and adjustable rate interest terms. The fair
values of fixed rate mortgage loans are based on discounted cash
flows utilizing applicable risk-adjusted spreads relative to the
current pricing of similar fixed rate loans, as well as
anticipated repayment schedules. The fair value of adjustable
rate commercial loans is based on the estimated discounted cash
flows utilizing the discount rates that approximate the pricing
of loans collateralized by similar commercial properties. The
fair value of non-performing loans at December 31, 2007 and
2006 was not estimated because it is not
82
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 19
|
Fair Value
of Financial
Instruments (Continued)
|
practicable to reasonably assess the credit adjustment that
would be applied in the marketplace for such loans. The
estimated fair value is net of allowance for loan losses.
Accrued Interest Receivable The
carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates its
fair value.
Federal Reserve Bank Stock and Federal Home Loan Bank
Stock The carrying amounts approximate fair
value as the stock may be resold to the issuer at carrying value.
Deposits The fair value of
non-maturity deposits is the amount payable on demand at the
reporting date. Non-maturity deposits include
noninterest-bearing demand deposits, savings accounts and money
market checking. Discounted cash flows have been used to value
term deposits such as certificates of deposit. The discount rate
used is based on interest rates currently being offered by the
Bank on comparable deposits as to amount and term.
Accrued Interest Payable The carrying
amount of accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.
FHLB Advances, Other Borrowings and Junior Subordinated
Debentures Discounted cash flows have been
used to value FHLB advances, other borrowings and junior
subordinated debentures.
Commitments to Extend Credit and Standby Letters of Credit
The fair values of commitments to extend
credit and standby letters of credit are based upon the
difference between the current value of similar loans and the
price at which the Bank has committed to make the loans.
|
|
Note 20
|
Condensed
Financial Information of Parent Company
|
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
5,296
|
|
|
$
|
7,578
|
|
Investment in Consolidated Subsidiaries
|
|
|
448,657
|
|
|
|
558,645
|
|
Investment in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
|
|
|
2,986
|
|
|
|
2,986
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
1,032
|
|
|
|
4,346
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
457,971
|
|
|
$
|
573,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Subordinated Debentures
|
|
$
|
82,406
|
|
|
$
|
82,406
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
4,020
|
|
|
|
4,032
|
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
371,545
|
|
|
|
487,117
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
$
|
457,971
|
|
|
$
|
573,555
|
|
|
|
83
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 20
|
Condensed
Financial Information of Parent
Company (Continued)
|
STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in Earnings (Losses) of Subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
(54,083
|
)
|
|
$
|
71,375
|
|
|
$
|
62,001
|
|
Other Expenses, Net
|
|
|
(10,155
|
)
|
|
|
(9,266
|
)
|
|
|
(6,133
|
)
|
Income Tax Benefit
|
|
|
3,718
|
|
|
|
3,540
|
|
|
|
2,361
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
(60,520
|
)
|
|
$
|
65,649
|
|
|
$
|
58,229
|
|
|
|
84
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 20
|
Condensed
Financial Information of Parent
Company (Continued)
|
STATEMENTS OF
CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS
FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
(60,520
|
)
|
|
$
|
65,649
|
|
|
$
|
58,229
|
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Used In
Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses (Earnings) of Subsidiaries
|
|
|
54,083
|
|
|
|
(71,375
|
)
|
|
|
(62,001
|
)
|
Decrease in Receivable from Hanmi Bank
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
455
|
|
Share-Based Compensation Expense
|
|
|
1,891
|
|
|
|
1,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) Decrease in Other Assets
|
|
|
3,314
|
|
|
|
(1,255
|
)
|
|
|
(1,292
|
)
|
Increase (Decrease) in Other Liabilities
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
Tax Benefit from Exercises of Stock Options
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities
|
|
|
(927
|
)
|
|
|
(4,140
|
)
|
|
|
(4,109
|
)
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS
FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends Received from Hanmi Bank
|
|
|
63,501
|
|
|
|
18,500
|
|
|
|
27,541
|
|
Business Acquisitions, Net of Cash Received
|
|
|
(4,121
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided By Investing Activities
|
|
|
59,380
|
|
|
|
18,500
|
|
|
|
27,541
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS
FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Exercise of Stock Options and Stock Warrants
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
|
|
3,553
|
|
|
|
2,516
|
|
Stock Issued for Business Acquisitions
|
|
|
2,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Paid to Acquire Treasury Stock
|
|
|
(49,971
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,041
|
)
|
Cash Paid to Repurchase Stock Warrants
|
|
|
(2,552
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Dividends Paid
|
|
|
(11,574
|
)
|
|
|
(11,805
|
)
|
|
|
(9,813
|
)
|
|
|
Net Cash Used In Financing Activities
|
|
|
(60,735
|
)
|
|
|
(8,252
|
)
|
|
|
(27,338
|
)
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
|
|
|
(2,282
|
)
|
|
|
6,108
|
|
|
|
(3,906
|
)
|
Cash at Beginning of Year
|
|
|
7,578
|
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
5,376
|
|
|
|
CASH AT END OF YEAR
|
|
$
|
5,296
|
|
|
$
|
7,578
|
|
|
$
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
85
Hanmi
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 (Continued)
|
|
Note 21
|
Quarterly
Financial Data (Unaudited)
|
Summarized quarterly financial data follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
Ended
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands; except per share amounts)
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
|
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income
|
|
$
|
67,956
|
|
|
$
|
69,860
|
|
|
$
|
71,197
|
|
|
$
|
71,883
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
29,891
|
|
|
|
31,270
|
|
|
|
33,342
|
|
|
|
34,190
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income Before Provision for Credit Losses
|
|
|
38,065
|
|
|
|
38,590
|
|
|
|
37,855
|
|
|
|
37,693
|
|
Provision for Credit Losses
|
|
|
6,132
|
|
|
|
3,023
|
|
|
|
8,464
|
|
|
|
20,704
|
|
Non-Interest Income
|
|
|
9,987
|
|
|
|
10,692
|
|
|
|
9,526
|
|
|
|
9,801
|
|
Non-Interest Expenses
|
|
|
20,969
|
|
|
|
21,490
|
|
|
|
21,249
|
|
|
|
126,221
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
20,951
|
|
|
|
24,769
|
|
|
|
17,668
|
|
|
|
(99,431
|
)
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
7,896
|
|
|
|
9,446
|
|
|
|
6,580
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
(LOSS)
|
|
$
|
13,055
|
|
|
$
|
15,323
|
|
|
$
|
11,088
|
|
|
$
|
(99,986
|
)
|
|
|
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
(2.15
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
(2.15
|
)
|
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income
|
|
$
|
58,535
|
|
|
$
|
63,906
|
|
|
$
|
68,664
|
|
|
$
|
69,084
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
21,680
|
|
|
|
25,509
|
|
|
|
28,934
|
|
|
|
30,306
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income Before Provision for Credit Losses
|
|
|
36,855
|
|
|
|
38,397
|
|
|
|
39,730
|
|
|
|
38,778
|
|
Provision for Credit Losses
|
|
|
2,960
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
1,682
|
|
|
|
1,631
|
|
Non-Interest Income
|
|
|
8,045
|
|
|
|
8,668
|
|
|
|
9,172
|
|
|
|
11,078
|
|
Non-Interest Expenses
|
|
|
17,740
|
|
|
|
19,797
|
|
|
|
19,861
|
|
|
|
19,915
|
|
|
|
Income Before Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
24,200
|
|
|
|
26,368
|
|
|
|
27,359
|
|
|
|
28,310
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
9,398
|
|
|
|
10,428
|
|
|
|
9,762
|
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$
|
14,802
|
|
|
$
|
15,940
|
|
|
$
|
17,597
|
|
|
$
|
17,310
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
Reclassifications have been made to the 2006 quarterly financial
statements to conform to the current presentation.
86
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
HANMI FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Chung
Hoon Youk
Interim President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 29, 2008
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated as
of February 29, 2008.
|
|
|
/s/ Chung Hoon Youk
Chung
Hoon Youk
Interim President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
/s/ Brian E. Cho
Brian
E. Cho
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
/s/ Richard B. C. Lee
Richard
B. C. Lee
Chairman of the Board
|
|
/s/ I Joon Ahn
I
Joon Ahn
Director
|
/s/ Ki Tae Hong
Ki
Tae Hong
Director
|
|
/s/ Joon Hyung Lee
Joon
Hyung Lee
Director
|
/s/ Mark K. Mason
Mark
K. Mason
Director
|
|
/s/ Chang Kyu Park
Chang
Kyu Park
Director
|
/s/ Joseph K. Rho
Joseph
K. Rho
Director
|
|
/s/ Won R. Yoon
Won
R. Yoon
Director
|
87
HANMI FINANCIAL
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation, As Amended
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Bylaws
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Bylaws
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen Certificate of Registrant
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Hanmi Financial Corporation 2007 Equity Compensation Plan
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Separation Agreement between Hanmi Financial Corporation and
Dr. Sung Won Sohn, dated December 27,
2007(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Employment Offer Letter with Brian E. Cho, executed
November 1, 2007
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Put Option Agreement between Hanmi Financial Corporation and
John M. Eggemeyer dated April 17, 2007
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Put Option Agreement between Hanmi Financial Corporation and
William J. Ruh dated April 17, 2007
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
Code of Ethics
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Under Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Under Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Previously
filed and incorporated by reference herein from Hanmi
Financials Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(No. 333-32770)
filed with the SEC on March 20, 2000. |
|
(2)
|
|
Previously
filed and incorporated by reference herein from Hanmi
Financials Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on November 26, 2007. |
|
(3)
|
|
Previously
filed and incorporated by reference herein from Hanmi
Financials Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on June 26, 2007. |
|
(4)
|
|
Previously
filed and incorporated by reference herein from Hanmi
Financials Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on December 27, 2007. |
|
(5)
|
|
Previously
filed and incorporated by reference herein from Hanmi
Financials Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on December 3, 2007. |
|
(6)
|
|
Previously
filed and incorporated by reference herein from Hanmi
Financials Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 filed with the SEC on
May 10, 2007. |
|
(7)
|
|
Previously
filed and incorporated by reference herein from Hanmi
Financials Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the SEC on
March 16, 2005. |
88