FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 |
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 for the transition period from to |
Commission file number: 0-49992
TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
82-0543156
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
4211 South 102nd Street, Omaha, Nebraska, 68127
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(402) 331-7856
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months, and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ
As of April 30, 2009, there were 557,015,800 outstanding shares of the registrants common stock.
TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION
INDEX
2
Part I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors
TD AMERITRADE Holding Corporation
We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of TD AMERITRADE Holding Corporation (the
Company) as of March 31, 2009, and the related condensed consolidated statements of income for the
three-month and six-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, and condensed consolidated
statements of cash flows for the six-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying
analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an
opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an
opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the
condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of TD AMERITRADE Holding
Corporation as of September 30, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein) and in our
report dated November 25, 2008, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated
balance sheet as of September 30, 2008, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to
the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
May 8, 2009
3
TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,072,642 |
|
|
$ |
674,135 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
78,738 |
|
|
|
369,133 |
|
Cash and investments segregated in compliance with federal regulations |
|
|
2,978,441 |
|
|
|
260,000 |
|
Receivable from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations |
|
|
2,078,897 |
|
|
|
4,177,149 |
|
Receivable from clients net of allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
3,469,408 |
|
|
|
6,933,926 |
|
Receivable from affiliates |
|
|
93,759 |
|
|
|
179,633 |
|
Other receivables net of allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
65,996 |
|
|
|
89,486 |
|
Securities owned, at fair value |
|
|
28,901 |
|
|
|
60,645 |
|
Property and equipment net of accumulated depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
159,074 |
|
|
|
153,208 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,988,449 |
|
|
|
1,947,102 |
|
Acquired intangible assets net of accumulated amortization |
|
|
982,941 |
|
|
|
1,013,679 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
24,189 |
|
|
|
17,158 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
10,597 |
|
|
|
12,768 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
82,208 |
|
|
|
63,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
13,114,240 |
|
|
$ |
15,951,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations |
|
$ |
2,390,172 |
|
|
$ |
5,769,676 |
|
Payable to clients |
|
|
5,705,720 |
|
|
|
5,070,671 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
740,195 |
|
|
|
571,425 |
|
Payable to affiliates |
|
|
3,633 |
|
|
|
3,637 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,433,650 |
|
|
|
1,444,000 |
|
Capitalized lease obligations |
|
|
2,818 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
54,508 |
|
|
|
166,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
10,330,696 |
|
|
|
13,026,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 100 million shares authorized, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; one billion shares authorized; 631,381,860
shares issued; March 31, 2009 555,775,612 shares outstanding;
September 30, 2008 593,130,521 shares outstanding |
|
|
6,314 |
|
|
|
6,314 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,603,744 |
|
|
|
1,613,700 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
2,202,840 |
|
|
|
1,886,412 |
|
Treasury
stock, common, at cost March 31, 2009 75,606,248 shares;
September 30, 2008 38,251,339 shares |
|
|
(1,027,486 |
) |
|
|
(580,664 |
) |
Deferred compensation |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(2,039 |
) |
|
|
(870 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,783,544 |
|
|
|
2,925,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
13,114,240 |
|
|
$ |
15,951,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction-based revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions and transaction fees |
|
$ |
265,442 |
|
|
$ |
244,887 |
|
|
$ |
552,555 |
|
|
$ |
505,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-based revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest revenue |
|
|
70,242 |
|
|
|
210,833 |
|
|
|
162,756 |
|
|
|
461,043 |
|
Brokerage interest expense |
|
|
(2,837 |
) |
|
|
(72,956 |
) |
|
|
(10,512 |
) |
|
|
(174,075 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest revenue |
|
|
67,405 |
|
|
|
137,877 |
|
|
|
152,244 |
|
|
|
286,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market deposit account fees |
|
|
136,537 |
|
|
|
156,085 |
|
|
|
299,767 |
|
|
|
311,925 |
|
Investment product fees |
|
|
48,096 |
|
|
|
77,685 |
|
|
|
117,262 |
|
|
|
145,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asset-based revenues |
|
|
252,038 |
|
|
|
371,647 |
|
|
|
569,273 |
|
|
|
744,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenues |
|
|
8,019 |
|
|
|
6,353 |
|
|
|
14,400 |
|
|
|
14,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
525,499 |
|
|
|
622,887 |
|
|
|
1,136,228 |
|
|
|
1,264,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation and benefits |
|
|
120,808 |
|
|
|
132,113 |
|
|
|
238,197 |
|
|
|
238,128 |
|
Fair value adjustments of compensation-related
derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
764 |
|
Clearing and execution costs |
|
|
15,077 |
|
|
|
9,372 |
|
|
|
30,705 |
|
|
|
21,438 |
|
Communications |
|
|
17,853 |
|
|
|
17,429 |
|
|
|
36,598 |
|
|
|
34,953 |
|
Occupancy and equipment costs |
|
|
29,536 |
|
|
|
25,220 |
|
|
|
59,663 |
|
|
|
50,228 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
10,635 |
|
|
|
8,887 |
|
|
|
22,138 |
|
|
|
16,582 |
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
|
|
15,200 |
|
|
|
14,749 |
|
|
|
30,738 |
|
|
|
28,472 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
22,069 |
|
|
|
28,580 |
|
|
|
49,408 |
|
|
|
47,862 |
|
Interest on borrowings |
|
|
8,244 |
|
|
|
20,604 |
|
|
|
23,881 |
|
|
|
46,330 |
|
Other |
|
|
8,720 |
|
|
|
18,669 |
|
|
|
20,284 |
|
|
|
31,039 |
|
Advertising |
|
|
53,097 |
|
|
|
47,310 |
|
|
|
99,794 |
|
|
|
92,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
301,239 |
|
|
|
322,933 |
|
|
|
611,406 |
|
|
|
608,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before other income and income taxes |
|
|
224,260 |
|
|
|
299,954 |
|
|
|
524,822 |
|
|
|
655,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax income |
|
|
224,260 |
|
|
|
299,954 |
|
|
|
524,822 |
|
|
|
656,585 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
92,230 |
|
|
|
113,238 |
|
|
|
208,394 |
|
|
|
229,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
132,030 |
|
|
$ |
186,716 |
|
|
$ |
316,428 |
|
|
$ |
427,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share basic |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
Earnings per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic |
|
|
573,519 |
|
|
|
594,339 |
|
|
|
582,734 |
|
|
|
594,629 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
581,284 |
|
|
|
603,470 |
|
|
|
591,048 |
|
|
|
603,932 |
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
316,428 |
|
|
$ |
427,555 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
22,138 |
|
|
|
16,582 |
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
|
|
30,738 |
|
|
|
28,472 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(118,645 |
) |
|
|
(76,815 |
) |
Gain on sale of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(644 |
) |
Loss on disposal of property |
|
|
1,698 |
|
|
|
788 |
|
Fair value adjustments of derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
764 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
12,041 |
|
|
|
12,754 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and investments segregated in compliance
with federal regulations |
|
|
(2,718,441 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Receivable from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations |
|
|
2,098,252 |
|
|
|
1,717,354 |
|
Receivable from clients, net |
|
|
3,464,408 |
|
|
|
198,657 |
|
Receivable from/payable to affiliates, net |
|
|
86,340 |
|
|
|
(19,374 |
) |
Other receivables, net |
|
|
23,516 |
|
|
|
16,885 |
|
Securities owned |
|
|
31,744 |
|
|
|
9,111 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(10,308 |
) |
|
|
(14,649 |
) |
Payable to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations |
|
|
(3,379,504 |
) |
|
|
(1,737,740 |
) |
Payable to clients |
|
|
635,050 |
|
|
|
(254,255 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
122,583 |
|
|
|
48,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
618,102 |
|
|
|
374,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
|
(25,259 |
) |
|
|
(58,857 |
) |
Cash equivalents acquired in Fiserv Trust Company acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
623,837 |
|
Cash paid for business combinations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(272,590 |
) |
Purchase of short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(328,690 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
894,277 |
|
Proceeds from redemption of money market funds |
|
|
290,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of other investments available-for-sale |
|
|
1,180 |
|
|
|
4,336 |
|
Other |
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
266,122 |
|
|
|
862,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in trust account deposits |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
174,598 |
|
Principal payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(18,750 |
) |
|
|
(15,625 |
) |
Principal payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
(2,169 |
) |
|
|
(1,588 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options; Six months ended
March 31, 2009 169,013 shares; 2008 1,396,541 shares |
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
3,279 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock; Six months ended
March 31, 2009 38,988,200 shares; 2008 2,717,947 shares |
|
|
(465,403 |
) |
|
|
(49,104 |
) |
Excess tax benefits on stock-based compensation |
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
7,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(485,003 |
) |
|
|
119,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(714 |
) |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
398,507 |
|
|
|
1,355,596 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
674,135 |
|
|
|
413,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
1,072,642 |
|
|
$ |
1,769,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
41,391 |
|
|
$ |
233,971 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
112,328 |
|
|
$ |
187,494 |
|
Tax benefit on exercises and distributions of stock-based compensation |
|
$ |
516 |
|
|
$ |
7,765 |
|
Noncash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
4,443 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Issuance of long-term debt in exchange for assets acquired |
|
$ |
8,400 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Three-Month and Six-Month Periods Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
(Unaudited)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of TD AMERITRADE Holding
Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the Company). Intercompany balances
and transactions have been eliminated.
These financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and, in the opinion of management, reflect all
adjustments, which are all of a normal recurring nature, necessary to present fairly the financial
position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles. These financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys annual
report filed on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008.
Reclassifications:
Approximately $0.2 million has been reclassified from receivable from affiliates to receivable from
brokers, dealers and clearing organizations as of September 30, 2008 on the Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets. Approximately $15.0 million has been reclassified from payable to affiliates to
payable to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations as of September 30, 2008 on the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets. Each of these reclassifications was made in order to conform to the
current financial statement presentation.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements:
SFAS No. 157 On October 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, for financial assets and liabilities and nonfinancial
assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements
on a recurring basis. The Company will not adopt this statement until
October 1, 2009 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are not recognized or disclosed at
fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. SFAS No. 157 clarifies the
definition of fair value and the methods used to measure fair value and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact on the
Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows. See Note 10 FAIR VALUE
DISCLOSURES for additional information.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements:
SFAS No. 141R In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS
No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations. SFAS No. 141R generally requires an acquirer to
recognize the identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, contingent purchase consideration
and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at fair value on the date of acquisition. It also
requires an acquirer to recognize as expense most transaction and restructuring costs as incurred,
rather than include such items in the cost of the acquired entity. For the Company, SFAS No. 141R
will apply prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after
October 1, 2009. The Company will evaluate the impact of SFAS No. 141R on any potential future
business combinations that may occur on or after the effective date.
2. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
On January 8, 2009, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to acquire thinkorswim Group
Inc. (thinkorswim) for approximately 28 million shares of Company common stock and approximately
$225 million in cash. thinkorswim offers online brokerage, investor education and related
financial products and services for self-directed investors and active traders. Upon the closing
of the acquisition, each share of thinkorswim common stock will be exchanged for $3.34 in cash and
0.3980 shares of the Companys common stock. The closing of the acquisition is subject to
customary conditions, including regulatory and thinkorswim stockholder approvals, and is expected
to occur during fiscal 2009.
On February 4, 2008, the Company completed the acquisition of Fiserv Trust Company, an investment
support services business and wholly-owned subsidiary of Fiserv, Inc. (Fiserv). The Company paid
$274.5 million in cash during fiscal 2008
8
for this acquisition. Pursuant to the stock purchase agreement, an additional earn-out payment of
up to $100 million in cash could be payable following the first anniversary of the acquisition
based on the achievement of revenue targets. Based on revenues through the February 4, 2009
anniversary date, the Company has accrued approximately $41.3 million for the earn-out payment
obligation as of March 31, 2009, which is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities on
the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The calculation of the earn-out payment is subject to
Fiservs review and is subject to offset by any amounts owed by Fiserv before it can be finalized
and paid. The Companys condensed consolidated financial statements include the results of
operations for Fiserv Trust Company beginning February 5, 2008.
3. GOODWILL AND ACQUIRED INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The Company has recorded goodwill for purchase business combinations to the extent the purchase
price of each completed acquisition exceeded the fair value of the net identifiable tangible and
intangible assets of each acquired company. The following table summarizes changes in the carrying
amount of goodwill for the six months ended March 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,947,102 |
|
Accrual of Fiserv Trust Company earn-out payment obligation |
|
|
41,266 |
|
Purchase accounting adjustments, net of income taxes (1) |
|
|
94 |
|
Tax benefit of option exercises (2) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,988,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Purchase accounting adjustments primarily consist of $0.4 million of net adjustments to
accruals for uncertain tax positions relating to the merger with Datek Online Holdings Corp.
(Datek) in fiscal 2002, partially offset by $0.3 million of adjustments to liabilities
related to the acquisition of Fiserv Trust Company in fiscal 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the tax benefit of exercises of replacement stock options that were issued in
connection with the Datek merger. The tax benefit of an option exercise is recorded as a
reduction of goodwill to the extent the Company recorded fair value of the replacement option
in the purchase accounting. To the extent any gain realized on an option exercise exceeds the
fair value of the replacement option recorded in the purchase accounting, the tax benefit on
the excess is recorded as additional paid-in capital. |
The Companys acquired intangible assets consist of the following as of March 31, 2009 (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
Client relationships |
|
$ |
1,062,046 |
|
|
$ |
(224,779 |
) |
|
$ |
837,267 |
|
Trademark license |
|
|
145,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,207,720 |
|
|
$ |
(224,779 |
) |
|
$ |
982,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company estimates that amortization expense on acquired intangible assets outstanding as of
March 31, 2009 will be approximately $30.8 million for the remainder of fiscal 2009 and
approximately $61.6 million for each of the five succeeding fiscal years.
9
4. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
The Companys cash and cash equivalents is summarized in the following table (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Corporate |
|
$ |
454,673 |
|
|
$ |
184,632 |
|
Broker-dealer subsidiaries |
|
|
565,493 |
|
|
|
418,626 |
|
Trust company subsidiaries |
|
|
38,203 |
|
|
|
61,430 |
|
Investment advisory subsidiaries |
|
|
14,273 |
|
|
|
9,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,072,642 |
|
|
$ |
674,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital requirements may limit the amount of cash available for dividend from the broker-dealer and
trust company subsidiaries to the parent company. Cash and cash equivalents of the investment
advisory subsidiaries is generally not available for corporate purposes.
5. SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS
Short-term investments consist of the following (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Money market mutual funds |
|
$ |
77,639 |
|
|
$ |
368,066 |
|
Federal National Mortgage
Association discount notes |
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments |
|
$ |
78,738 |
|
|
$ |
369,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008, the Company had holdings with a fair value of approximately $585.5
million in the Primary Fund, a money market mutual fund managed by The Reserve, an independent
mutual fund company. In September 2008, the net asset value of the Primary Fund declined below
$1.00 per share and the fund announced it was liquidating under the supervision of the SEC. In
order to facilitate an orderly liquidation, the SEC allowed the fund to suspend redemptions until
the fund could liquidate portfolio securities without further impairing the net asset value. As of
September 30, 2008, the Company classified approximately $217.4 million of its Primary Fund
holdings as cash and cash equivalents, based on its estimated share of the partial redemption. The
remaining $368.1 million of the Companys Primary Fund holdings was reclassified to short-term
investments due to uncertainty as to whether these holdings could be converted to cash within three
months. From October 31, 2008 through April 17, 2009, the Company has received $534.5 million of
cash (including $26.7 million received subsequent to
March 31, 2009) as The Reserve has redeemed approximately 90% of the shares of the fund. The
Company cannot predict when The Reserve will redeem the remaining shares of the fund.
6. ACQUISITION EXIT LIABILITIES
The following tables summarize activity in the Companys acquisition exit liabilities for the
three-month and six-month periods ended March 31, 2009, which are included in accounts payable and
accrued liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2008 |
|
|
Utilized |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Mar. 31, 2009 |
|
Employee compensation and benefits |
|
$ |
2,326 |
|
|
$ |
(223 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,103 |
|
Occupancy and equipment costs |
|
|
12,232 |
|
|
|
(901 |
) |
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
12,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total acquisition exit liabilities |
|
$ |
14,558 |
|
|
$ |
(1,124 |
) |
|
$ |
1,475 |
|
|
$ |
14,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
Sept. 30, 2008 |
|
|
Utilized |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Mar. 31, 2009 |
|
Employee compensation and benefits |
|
$ |
2,575 |
|
|
$ |
(472 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,103 |
|
Occupancy and equipment costs |
|
|
12,742 |
|
|
|
(1,411 |
) |
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
12,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total acquisition exit liabilities |
|
$ |
15,317 |
|
|
$ |
(1,883 |
) |
|
$ |
1,475 |
|
|
$ |
14,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The exit liabilities primarily relate to the acquisition of TD Waterhouse Group, Inc. (TD
Waterhouse) during fiscal 2006. The adjustments to occupancy and equipment exit liabilities were
included in the determination of net income for the three-month and six-month periods ended March
31, 2009. Employee compensation exit liabilities are expected to be paid over contractual periods
ending in fiscal 2013. Remaining occupancy and equipment exit liabilities are expected to be
utilized over the related lease periods through fiscal 2016.
7. INCOME TAXES
The Companys effective income tax rate for the six months ended March 31, 2009 was 39.7%, compared
to 34.9% for the six months ended March 31, 2008. The provision for income taxes for the six
months ended March 31, 2009 was higher than normal due to unfavorable deferred income tax
adjustments of $5.9 million resulting from recent state income tax law changes and capital loss
limitations on the Companys Reserve Primary Fund holdings. These items unfavorably impacted the
Companys earnings for the six months ended March 31, 2009 by approximately $0.01 per share. The
provision for income taxes for the six months ended March 31, 2008 was unusually low due to $7.2
million of favorable resolutions of state income tax matters and $11.1 million of adjustments to
current and deferred income taxes resulting from a revision to estimated state income tax expense.
The revision was based on the Companys actual state income tax returns filed for calendar year
2006 and similar adjustments applied to estimated state income tax rates for 2007 and future years.
These items favorably impacted the Companys earnings for the six months ended March 31, 2008 by
approximately $0.03 per share.
8. CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
The Companys broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to the SEC Uniform Net Capital Rule (Rule
15c3-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)), which requires the
maintenance of minimum net capital, as defined. Net capital is calculated for each broker-dealer
subsidiary individually. Excess net capital of one broker-dealer subsidiary may not be used to
offset a net capital deficiency of another broker-dealer subsidiary. Net capital and the related
net capital requirement may fluctuate on a daily basis.
Net capital and net capital requirements for the Companys broker-dealer subsidiaries are
summarized in the following table (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Capital |
|
|
Excess |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Capital |
|
|
Excess |
|
|
|
Net Capital |
|
|
Required |
|
|
Net Capital |
|
|
Net Capital |
|
|
Required |
|
|
Net Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TD AMERITRADE
Clearing, Inc. |
|
$ |
712,292 |
|
|
$ |
84,716 |
|
|
$ |
627,576 |
|
|
$ |
836,531 |
|
|
$ |
157,458 |
|
|
$ |
679,073 |
|
TD AMERITRADE, Inc. |
|
|
113,742 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
113,242 |
|
|
|
44,039 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
43,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
826,034 |
|
|
$ |
85,216 |
|
|
$ |
740,818 |
|
|
$ |
880,570 |
|
|
$ |
157,708 |
|
|
$ |
722,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TD AMERITRADE Clearing, Inc. (TDA Clearing) is a clearing broker-dealer and TD AMERITRADE, Inc.
(TDA Inc.) is an introducing broker-dealer.
The Companys non-depository trust company subsidiary, TD AMERITRADE Trust Company (TDATC), is
subject to capital requirements established by the State of Maine, which requires TDATC to maintain
minimum Tier 1 capital, as defined. TDATCs Tier 1 capital was $17.6 million and $112.4 million as
of March 31, 2009 and September 30, 2008, respectively, which exceeded the required Tier 1 capital
by $7.6 million and $102.4 million, respectively.
11
9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Spam Litigation A purported class action, captioned Elvey v. TD Ameritrade, Inc., was filed on
May 31, 2007 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The
complaint alleges that there was a breach in TDA Inc.s systems, which allowed access to e-mail
addresses and other personal information of account holders, and that as a result account holders
received unsolicited e-mail from spammers promoting certain stocks and have been subjected to an
increased risk of identity theft. The complaint requests unspecified damages and injunctive and
other equitable relief. A second lawsuit, captioned Zigler v. TD Ameritrade, Inc., was filed on
September 26, 2007, in the same jurisdiction on behalf of a purported nationwide class of account
holders. The factual allegations of the complaint and the relief sought are substantially the same
as those in the first lawsuit. The cases were consolidated under the caption In re TD Ameritrade
Accountholders Litigation. The Company hired an independent consultant to investigate whether
identity theft occurred as a result of the breach. The consultant has conducted four investigations
since August 2007 and reported that it found no evidence of identity theft. The parties entered
into an agreement to settle the lawsuits on a class basis subject to court approval. On May 1,
2009, the Court granted preliminary approval of the proposed settlement, which had been revised,
and set a hearing on final approval for September 10, 2009. The settlement is not expected to have
a material effect on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Auction Rate Securities Matters Beginning in March 2008, lawsuits were filed against various
financial services firms by customers related to their investments in auction rate securities
(ARS). The plaintiffs in these lawsuits allege that the defendants made material
misrepresentations and omissions in statements to customers about investments in ARS and the manner
in which the ARS market functioned in violation of provisions of the federal securities laws. Two
purported class action complaints have been filed alleging such conduct with respect to TDA Inc.
and TD AMERITRADE Holding Corporation. The cases, which are pending in the U.S. District Court for
the Southern District of New York, have been consolidated under the caption In re Humphrys v. TD
Ameritrade Holding Corp. An amended complaint was filed in February 2009. The amended complaint
seeks an unspecified amount of damages, equitable relief, interest and attorneys fees. In April
2009 the Company filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint.
The SEC and other regulatory authorities are conducting investigations regarding the sale of ARS.
TDA Inc. has received subpoenas and other requests for documents and information from the
regulatory authorities. The Company is cooperating with the investigations and requests. The
Company and regulatory authorities are in discussions regarding the possible resolution of the
investigations with respect to TDA Inc., which could include the Company offering to purchase
certain client ARS over time. As of May 1, 2009, the Companys clients held ARS with an aggregate
par value of approximately $691 million in TDA Inc. accounts, including $190 million custodied for
clients of independent registered investment advisors.
Reserve Fund Matters During September 2008, The Reserve, an independent mutual fund company,
announced that the net asset value of two of its money market mutual funds (the Primary Fund and
the International Liquidity Fund) declined below $1.00 per share. In addition, The Reserve
announced that the net asset value of the Reserve Yield Plus Fund, which is not a money market
mutual fund but sought to maintain a stable net asset value of $1.00 per share, declined below
$1.00 per share. TDA Inc.s clients hold shares in these funds, which The Reserve announced are
being liquidated. From October 31, 2008 through May 1, 2009, Primary Fund, International Liquidity
Fund and Yield Plus Fund shareholders have received distributions totaling approximately $0.90 per
share, $0.65 per share and $0.85 per share, respectively. The SEC and other regulatory authorities
are conducting investigations regarding TDA Inc.s offering of The Reserve funds to clients. TDA
Inc. has received subpoenas and other requests for documents and information from the regulatory
authorities. TDA Inc. is cooperating with the investigations and requests.
In November and December 2008 two purported class action lawsuits were filed with respect to the
Yield Plus Fund. The lawsuits are captioned Ross v. Reserve Management Company, Inc. et al. in the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and Hamilton v. TD Ameritrade, Inc. et
al. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The plaintiff in the Hamilton
case dismissed his complaint without prejudice on March 2, 2009. The Ross lawsuit is on behalf of
persons who purchased shares of Reserve Yield Plus Fund. The complaint names as defendants a
number of entities and individuals related to The Reserve. The Company is also named as a
defendant. The complaint alleges claims of violations of the federal securities laws and other
claims based on allegations that false and misleading statements and omissions were made in the
Reserve Yield Plus Fund prospectus and in other statements regarding the fund. The complaint seeks
an unspecified amount of compensatory damages, interest and attorneys fees.
Other Legal and Regulatory Matters The Company is subject to lawsuits, arbitrations, claims and
other legal proceedings in connection with its business. Some of the legal actions include claims
for substantial or unspecified compensatory and/or punitive damages. A substantial adverse
judgment or other unfavorable resolution of these matters could have a material adverse effect on
the Companys financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Management believes the
Company
12
has adequate legal defenses with respect to the legal proceedings to which it is a
defendant or respondent and the outcome of these pending proceedings is not likely to have a
material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the
Company. However, the Company is unable to predict the outcome of these matters.
In the normal course of business, the Company discusses matters with its regulators raised during
regulatory examinations or otherwise subject to their inquiry. These matters could result in
censures, fines or other sanctions. Management believes the outcome of any resulting actions will
not be material to the Companys financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
However, the Company is unable to predict the outcome of these matters.
Income Taxes The Companys federal and state income tax returns are subject to examination by
taxing authorities. Because the application of tax laws and regulations to many types of
transactions is subject to varying interpretations, amounts reported in the condensed consolidated
financial statements could be significantly changed at a later date upon final determinations by
taxing authorities. The Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD) has agreed to indemnify the Company for tax
obligations, if any, pertaining to activities of TD Waterhouse prior to the Companys acquisition
of TD Waterhouse.
General Contingencies In the ordinary course of business, there are various contingencies that
are not reflected in the condensed consolidated financial statements. These include the Companys
broker-dealer subsidiaries client activities involving the execution, settlement and financing of various client securities transactions. These
activities may expose the Company to credit risk in the event the clients are unable to fulfill
their contractual obligations.
Client securities activities are transacted on either a cash or margin basis. In margin
transactions, the Company may extend credit to the client, subject to various regulatory and
internal margin requirements, collateralized by cash and securities in the clients account. In
connection with these activities, the Company also executes and clears client transactions
involving the sale of securities not yet purchased (short sales). Such margin-related
transactions may expose the Company to credit risk in the event a clients assets are not
sufficient to fully cover losses that the client may incur. In the event the client fails to
satisfy its obligations, the Company has the authority to purchase or sell financial instruments in
the clients account at prevailing market prices in order to fulfill the clients obligations. The
Company seeks to mitigate the risks associated with its client securities activities by requiring
clients to maintain margin collateral in compliance with various regulatory and internal
guidelines. The Company monitors required margin levels throughout each trading day and, pursuant
to such guidelines, requires clients to deposit additional collateral, or to reduce positions, when
necessary.
The Company loans securities temporarily to other broker-dealers in connection with its
broker-dealer business. The Company receives cash as collateral for the securities loaned.
Increases in securities prices may cause the market value of the securities loaned to exceed the
amount of cash received as collateral. In the event the counterparty to these transactions does
not return the loaned securities, the Company may be exposed to the risk of acquiring the
securities at prevailing market prices in order to satisfy its client obligations. The Company
mitigates this risk by requiring credit approvals for counterparties, by monitoring the market
value of securities loaned on a daily basis and requiring additional cash as collateral when
necessary, and by participating in a risk-sharing program offered through the Options Clearing
Corporation (OCC).
The Company borrows securities temporarily from other broker-dealers in connection with its
broker-dealer business. The Company deposits cash as collateral for the securities borrowed.
Decreases in securities prices may cause the market value of the securities borrowed to fall below
the amount of cash deposited as collateral. In the event the counterparty to these transactions
does not return the cash deposited, the Company may be exposed to the risk of selling the
securities at prevailing market prices. The Company mitigates this risk by requiring credit
approvals for counterparties, by monitoring the collateral values on a daily basis and requiring
collateral to be returned by the counterparties when necessary, and by participating in a
risk-sharing program offered through the OCC.
As of March 31, 2009, client excess margin securities of approximately $4.8 billion and stock
borrowings of approximately $1.9 billion were available to the Company to utilize as collateral on
various borrowings or for other purposes. The Company had loaned approximately $2.4 billion and
repledged approximately $0.8 billion of that collateral as of March 31, 2009.
Guarantees The Company is a member of and provides guarantees to securities clearinghouses and
exchanges. Under related agreements, the Company is generally required to guarantee the
performance of other members. Under these agreements, if a member becomes unable to satisfy its
obligations to the clearinghouse, other members would be required to meet shortfalls. The
Companys liability under these arrangements is not quantifiable and could exceed the cash and
securities it has posted to the clearinghouse as collateral. However, the potential for the
Company to be required to make payments under these agreements is considered remote. Accordingly,
no contingent liability is carried on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for these
guarantees.
See Money Market Deposit Account Agreement in Note 13 for a description of a guarantee included
in that agreement.
13
During September 2008, the net asset value of two money market mutual funds held by some of the
Companys clients, the Primary Fund and the International Liquidity Fund, declined below $1.00 per
share. These funds are managed by The Reserve, an independent mutual fund company. The Reserve
subsequently announced it was suspending redemptions of these funds to effect an orderly
liquidation. The Company announced a commitment of up to $55 million to protect its clients
positions in these funds. In the event the Companys clients receive less than $1.00 per share
for these funds upon an orderly liquidation, the Company will commit up to $50 million (or $0.03
per share of the fund) for clients in the Primary Fund and up to $5 million for clients in the
International Liquidity Fund to mitigate client losses. Based on information from The Reserve and
other publicly available information, the Company has accrued an estimated fair value of $27.0
million for this obligation as of March 31, 2009 and September 30, 2008, which is included in
accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Employment Agreements The Company has entered into employment agreements with several of its key
executive officers. These employment agreements generally provide for annual base salary and
incentive compensation, stock award acceleration and severance payments in the event of termination
of employment under certain defined circumstances or changes in control of the Company. Incentive
compensation amounts are based on the Companys financial performance and other factors.
10. FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES
Effective October 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157 for financial assets and liabilities
and nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statements on a recurring basis. SFAS No. 157 clarifies the definition of fair value and
the methods used to measure fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
Fair Value Measurement Definition and Hierarchy
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date.
In determining fair value, the Company uses various valuation approaches, including market, income
and/or cost approaches. SFAS No. 157 establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair
value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by
requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs reflect the
assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, developed based on
market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs reflect the
Companys own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset
or liability, developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. The fair
value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into
three broad levels, as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. This category includes active
exchange-traded mutual funds and equity securities. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for
the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Such inputs include quoted prices
in markets that are not active, quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active
markets, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and
inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by
correlation or other means. This category includes most debt securities and other
interest-sensitive investment securities. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, where there is little, if
any, observable market activity or data for the asset or liability. This category includes
assets and liabilities related to money market mutual funds managed by The Reserve for
which the net asset value has declined below $1.00 per share and the funds are being
liquidated. This category also includes auction rate securities for which the periodic
auctions have failed. |
14
The following table presents the Companys fair value hierarchy for assets and liabilities measured
on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,099 |
|
|
$ |
77,639 |
|
|
$ |
78,738 |
|
Securities owned |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
4,839 |
|
|
|
23,773 |
|
|
|
28,901 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,820 |
|
|
|
9,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
1,246 |
|
|
$ |
5,938 |
|
|
$ |
110,232 |
|
|
$ |
117,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold, not yet purchased (1) |
|
$ |
2,519 |
|
|
$ |
640 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,159 |
|
Client Reserve Fund commitment (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,994 |
|
|
|
26,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value |
|
$ |
2,519 |
|
|
$ |
640 |
|
|
$ |
26,994 |
|
|
$ |
30,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts are included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets. |
The following table presents the changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured on a recurring
basis for the six months ended March 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized Losses |
|
|
Sales, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
Included in |
|
|
Issuances and |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Settlements, Net |
|
|
2009 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (1) |
|
$ |
217,471 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(217,471 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
368,066 |
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(290,347 |
) |
|
|
77,639 |
|
Securities owned |
|
|
53,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,814 |
) |
|
|
23,773 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,180 |
) |
|
|
8,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
649,124 |
|
|
$ |
(80 |
) |
|
$ |
(538,812 |
) |
|
$ |
110,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold, not yet purchased |
|
$ |
4,636 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(4,636 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Client Reserve Fund commitment |
|
|
26,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value |
|
$ |
31,630 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(4,636 |
) |
|
$ |
26,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents positions in the Primary Fund that were classified as cash and cash equivalents as
of September 30, 2008. |
Valuation Techniques
In general, and where applicable, the Company uses quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities to determine fair value. This pricing methodology applies to the Companys
Level 1 investments. If quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities are
not available to determine fair value, then the Company uses quoted prices for similar assets and
liabilities or inputs other than the quoted prices that are observable, either directly or
indirectly. This pricing methodology applies to the Companys Level 2 investments.
The fair value of money market mutual fund positions in the Primary Fund is estimated based on
portfolio holdings data published by The Reserve and is categorized in Level 3 of the fair value
hierarchy. At March 31, 2009, $77.6 million and $4.7 million of Primary Fund positions are
included in the table above within the short-term investments and securities owned categories,
respectively. The fair value of the client Reserve Fund commitment, which is described under
Guarantees in Note 9, is estimated based on portfolio holdings data published by The Reserve for
the Primary Fund and International Liquidity Fund.
15
11. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the computation of basic
and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
132,030 |
|
|
$ |
186,716 |
|
|
$ |
316,428 |
|
|
$ |
427,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic |
|
|
573,519 |
|
|
|
594,339 |
|
|
|
582,734 |
|
|
|
594,629 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
6,165 |
|
|
|
7,544 |
|
|
|
6,199 |
|
|
|
7,880 |
|
Restricted stock units |
|
|
1,496 |
|
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
2,024 |
|
|
|
1,363 |
|
Deferred compensation shares |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
581,284 |
|
|
|
603,470 |
|
|
|
591,048 |
|
|
|
603,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share basic |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
Earnings per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
12. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive income is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
132,030 |
|
|
$ |
186,716 |
|
|
$ |
316,428 |
|
|
$ |
427,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized losses on investment
securities available-for-sale |
|
|
(511 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,121 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Adjustment for deferred income taxes on net
unrealized losses |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains on
investment securities included in net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(540 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for deferred income taxes
on realized investment gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
(457 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
(382 |
) |
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
(1,169 |
) |
|
|
(413 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
131,648 |
|
|
$ |
186,620 |
|
|
$ |
315,259 |
|
|
$ |
427,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Stock Repurchase
On February 17, 2009, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with Marlene M. Ricketts
and the Joe and Marlene Ricketts Grandchildrens Trust to purchase approximately 34 million shares
of common stock of the Company for approximately $403 million in cash ($11.85 per share). J. Joe
Ricketts serves on the Companys board of directors. The purchase and sale of the stock occurred
on February 20, 2009.
Transactions with TD and Affiliates
As a result of the acquisition of TD Waterhouse during fiscal 2006, TD became an affiliate of the
Company. TD owned approximately 47.6% of the Companys common stock as of March 31, 2009, of which
45% is permitted to be voted under the terms of the Stockholders Agreement among TD, the Company
and certain other stockholders. Pursuant to the Stockholders Agreement, TD has the right to
designate five of twelve members to the Companys board of directors. The Company
transacts
business and has extensive relationships with TD and certain of its affiliates. A description of
significant transactions with TD and its affiliates is set forth below.
16
Money Market Deposit Account Agreement
The Company is party to a money market deposit account (MMDA) agreement with TD Bank USA, N.A.
and TD, which was originally entered into on January 24, 2006 in connection with the TD Waterhouse
acquisition. Under the MMDA agreement, TD Bank USA makes available to clients of the Company money
market deposit accounts as designated sweep vehicles. The Company provides marketing,
recordkeeping and support services for TD Bank USA with respect to the money market deposit
accounts. In exchange for providing these services, TD Bank USA pays the Company a fee based on
the yield earned by TD Bank USA on the client MMDA assets (including any gains or losses from sales
of investments), less the actual interest paid to clients, actual interest cost incurred on
borrowings, a flat fee to TD Bank USA of 25 basis points and the cost of FDIC insurance premiums.
Effective July 1, 2008, the Company entered into an amendment to the MMDA agreement with TD Bank
USA and TD. The amended agreement has a term of five years beginning July 1, 2008, and is
automatically renewable for successive five-year terms, provided that it may be terminated by any
party upon two years prior written notice. The amended agreement provides that the marketing fee
earned on the MMDA agreement is calculated based on three primary components: (a) the actual yield
earned on investments in place as of July 1, 2008, which were primarily fixed-income securities
backed by Canadian government guarantees, (b) the yield on other fixed-rate investments, based on
prevailing fixed rates for identical balances and maturities in the interest rate swap market
(generally LIBOR-based) at the time such investments were added to the MMDA portfolio and (c)
floating-rate investments, based on the monthly average rate for 30-day LIBOR. The amendment
provides that, from time to time, the Company may recommend amounts and maturity dates for the
other fixed-rate investments (component (b) above) in the MMDA portfolio, subject to the approval
of TD Bank USA. For the month of March 2009, the MMDA portfolio was comprised of approximately 36%
component (a) investments, 45% component (b) investments and 19% component (c) investments.
In the event the fee computation results in a negative amount, the Company must pay TD Bank USA the
negative amount. This effectively results in the Company guaranteeing TD Bank USA revenue of 25
basis points on the MMDA agreement, plus the reimbursement of FDIC insurance premiums. The fee
computation under the MMDA agreement is affected by many variables, including the type, duration,
credit quality, principal balance and yield of the investment portfolio at TD Bank USA, the
prevailing interest rate environment, the amount of client deposits and the yield paid on client
deposits. Because a negative MMDA fee computation would arise only if there were extraordinary
movements in many of these variables, the maximum potential amount of future payments the Company
could be required to make under this arrangement cannot be reasonably estimated. Management
believes the potential for the fee calculation to result in a negative amount is remote and the
fair value of the guarantee is not material. Accordingly, no contingent liability is carried on
the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for the MMDA agreement.
The Company earned fee income associated with the money market deposit account agreement of $136.5
million and $299.8 million for the three months and six months ended March 31, 2009, respectively,
and $156.1 million and $311.9 million for the three months and six months ended March 31, 2008,
respectively, which is reported as money market deposit account fees on the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Income.
Mutual Fund Agreements
The Company and an affiliate of TD are parties to a services agreement, transfer agency agreement,
shareholder services agreement and a dealer agreement pursuant to which certain mutual funds are
made available as money market sweep or direct purchase options to Company clients. The Company
performs marketing support services with respect to those funds. In consideration for offering the
funds and performing the marketing support services, an affiliate of TD compensates the Company in
accordance with the provisions of the services agreement. The Company also performs certain
services for the applicable fund and earns fees for those services. In the event compensation under
the transfer agency agreement, shareholder services agreement and dealer agreement is less than the
minimum compensation called for by the services agreement, the deficit is earned by the Company
under the services agreement. The services agreement had an initial term of two years and was
automatically renewed for an additional two-year term on January 24, 2008. The agreement is
automatically renewable for successive two-year terms (so long as certain related agreements are in
effect). It may be terminated by any party upon one years prior written notice. The Company
earned fee income associated with these agreements of $31.5 million and $83.0 million for the three
months and six months ended March 31, 2009, respectively, and $52.9 million and $96.4 million for
the three months and six months ended March 31, 2008, respectively, which is included in investment
product fees on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
17
Securities Borrowing and Lending
In connection with its brokerage business, the Company engages in securities borrowing and lending
with TD Securities, Inc. (TDSI), an affiliate of TD. Receivable from brokers, dealers and
clearing organizations includes $0.7 million and $0.2 million of receivables from TDSI as of March
31, 2009 and September 30, 2008, respectively. Payable to brokers, dealers and clearing
organizations includes $121.3 million and $15.0 million of payables to TDSI as of March 31, 2009
and September 30, 2008, respectively. The Company incurred net interest expense associated with
securities borrowing and lending with TDSI of $0.1 million and $0.5 million for the three months
and six months ended March 31, 2009, respectively. The net interest associated with securities
borrowing and lending with TDSI for the three months and six months ended March 31, 2008 was not
significant.
Cash Management Services Agreement
Pursuant to a cash management services agreement, TD Bank USA provides cash management services to
clients of TDA Inc. In exchange for such services, the Company pays TD Bank USA service-based fees
agreed upon by the parties. The Company incurred expense associated with the cash management
services agreement of $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the three months and six months ended March
31, 2009, respectively, and $0.3 million and $0.7 million for the three months and six months ended
March 31, 2008, respectively, which is included in clearing and execution costs on the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Income. The cash management services agreement will continue in effect
for as long as the MMDA agreement remains in effect, provided that it may be terminated by TDA Inc.
without cause upon 60 days prior written notice to TD Bank USA.
Indemnification Agreement for Phantom Stock Plan Liabilities
Pursuant to an indemnification agreement, the Company agreed to assume TD Waterhouse liabilities
related to the payout of awards under The Toronto-Dominion Bank 2002 Phantom Stock Incentive Plan
following the completion of the TD Waterhouse acquisition. Under this plan, participants were
granted units of stock appreciation rights (SARs) based on TDs common stock that generally vest
over four years. Upon exercise, the participant receives cash representing the appreciated value
of the units between the grant date and the redemption date. In connection with the payout of
awards under the 2002 Phantom Stock Incentive Plan, TD Discount Brokerage Holdings LLC (TDDBH), a
wholly-owned subsidiary of TD, agreed to indemnify the Company for any liabilities incurred by the
Company in excess of the provision for such liability included on the closing date balance sheet of
TD Waterhouse. In addition, in the event that the liability incurred by the Company in connection
with the 2002 Phantom Stock Incentive Plan is less than the provision for such liability included
on the closing date balance sheet of TD Waterhouse, the Company agreed to pay the difference to
TDDBH. There
were 49,855 and 50,940 SARs outstanding as of March 31, 2009 and September 30, 2008, respectively,
with an approximate value of $0.3 million and $1.7 million, respectively. The indemnification
agreement effectively protects the Company against fluctuations in TDs common stock price with
respect to the SARs, so there will be no net effect on the Companys results of operations
resulting from such fluctuations.
Restricted Share Units and Related Swap Agreements
The Company assumed TD Waterhouse restricted share unit plan liabilities following the completion
of the acquisition of TD Waterhouse. Restricted share units are phantom share units with a value
equivalent to the Toronto Stock Exchange closing price of TD common shares on the day before the
award issuance. These awards vest and mature on the third or fourth anniversary of the award date
at the average of the high and low prices for the 20 trading days preceding the redemption date.
The redemption value, after tax withholdings, is paid in cash. Under these plans, participants were
granted phantom share units equivalent to TDs common stock that vest on a specified date after
three or four years. On the acquisition date of TD Waterhouse, the Company entered into equity
swap agreements with an affiliate of TD to offset changes in TDs common stock price. During
December 2007, most of the restricted share units vested and were settled and all the equity swap
agreements expired. In May 2008, the remaining restricted share units vested and were settled.
The Company recorded a loss on fair value adjustments to the equity swap agreements of $0.8 million
for the six months ended March 31, 2008, which is reported as fair value adjustments of
compensation-related derivative instruments on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
Because the swap agreements were not designated for hedge accounting, the fair value adjustments
were not recorded in the same category of the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income as the
corresponding compensation expense, which was recorded in the employee compensation and benefits
category.
18
Canadian Call Center Services Agreement
Pursuant to the Canadian call center services agreement, TD receives and services client calls at
its London, Ontario site for clients of TDA Inc. After May 1, 2013, either party may terminate
this agreement without cause and without penalty by providing 24 months prior written notice. In
consideration of the performance by TD of the call center services, the Company pays TD, on a
monthly basis, an amount approximately equal to TDs monthly cost. The Company incurred expenses
associated with the Canadian call center services agreement of $3.9 million and $7.8 million for
the three months and six months ended March 31, 2009, respectively, and $4.5 million and $8.7
million for the three months and six months ended March 31, 2008, respectively, which is included
in professional services expense on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
Certificates of Deposit Brokerage Agreements
Effective as of September 24, 2008, TDA Inc. entered into a certificates of deposit brokerage
agreement with TD Bank USA, under which TDA Inc. acts as agent for its clients in purchasing
certificates of deposit from TD Bank USA. Under the agreement, TD Bank USA pays TDA Inc. a
placement fee for each certificate of deposit issued in an amount agreed to by both parties.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, TDA Inc. promoted a limited time offer to purchase a
three-month TD Bank USA certificate of deposit with a premium yield to clients that made a deposit
or transferred $25,000 into their TDA Inc. brokerage account during a specified time period.
Under this promotion, TDA Inc. reimburses TD Bank USA for the subsidized portion of the premium
yield paid to its clients. The Company incurred net costs to TD Bank USA associated with this
promotional offer of $3.3 million for the three-months and six-months ended March 31, 2009,
respectively, which is included in advertising expense on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Income.
Under a previous certificates of deposit brokerage agreement entered into on December 12, 2007
between TDA Inc. and TD Bank USA, TDA Inc. acted as an agent for its clients in purchasing
certificates of deposit from TD Bank USA. Fees were calculated under the agreement in a manner
consistent with the methodology of the MMDA agreement described above. This agreement was
superseded by the September 24, 2008 certificates of deposit brokerage agreement. The Company
incurred net fee expense associated with the agreement of $1.6 million for the three months and six
months ended March 31, 2008, respectively, which is included in net interest revenue on the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
Other Related Party Transactions
TD Options LLC, a subsidiary of TD, pays the Company the amount of exchange-sponsored payment for
order flow that it receives for routing TDA Inc. client orders to the exchanges. The Company
earned $0.9 million and $1.6 million of payment
for order flow revenues from TD Options LLC for the three months and six months ended March 31,
2009, respectively, and $1.1 million and $1.7 million for the three months and six months ended
March 31, 2008, respectively, which is included in commissions and transaction fees on the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
Except as otherwise indicated, receivables from and payables to TD and affiliates of TD resulting
from the related party transactions described above are included in receivable from affiliates and
payable to affiliates, respectively, on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Receivables
from and payables to TD affiliates resulting from client cash sweep activity are generally settled
in cash the next business day. Other receivables from and payables to affiliates of TD are
generally settled in cash on a monthly basis.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company should
be read in conjunction with the Selected Financial Data and the Consolidated Financial Statements
and Notes thereto included in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008, and the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto contained
in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
This discussion contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements that are not historical facts, including
statements about our beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements include statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words may, could,
would, should, believe, expect, anticipate, plan, estimate, target, project,
intend and similar expressions. In particular, forward-looking statements contained in this
discussion include our expectations regarding: the effect of client trading activity on our
results of operations; the effect of changes in interest rates on our net interest spread; our
migration of client cash balances into the money market deposit account (MMDA) offering; our
effective income tax rate; our capital and liquidity needs and our plans to finance such needs; and
the impact of recently issued accounting pronouncements.
19
The Companys actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking
statements. Important factors that may cause such differences include, but are not limited to:
general economic and political conditions; interest rates; stock market fluctuations and changes in
client trading activity; increased competition; systems failures and capacity constraints; network
security risks; ability to service debt obligations; ability to obtain regulatory and thinkorswim
Group Inc. (thinkorswim) stockholder approval for the proposed acquisition of thinkorswim;
regulatory and legal matters and uncertainties and the other risks and uncertainties set forth
under Item 1A. Risk Factors of the Companys annual report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. The forward-looking statements contained in this report
speak only as of the date on which the statements were made. We undertake no obligation to
publicly update or revise these statements, whether as a result of new information, future events
or otherwise.
The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make judgments and estimates that may
have a significant impact upon our financial results. Note 1 of our Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, contains a summary of our
significant accounting policies, many of which require the use of estimates and assumptions. We
believe that the following areas are particularly subject to managements judgments and estimates
and could materially affect our results of operations and financial position: valuation of goodwill
and acquired intangible assets; valuation of stock-based compensation; estimates of effective
income tax rates, deferred income taxes and valuation allowances; and valuation of guarantees.
These areas are discussed in further detail under the heading Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates in Item 7 of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2008.
Unless otherwise indicated, the terms we, us or Company in this report refer to TD AMERITRADE
Holding Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The term GAAP refers to U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
In discussing and analyzing our business, we utilize several metrics and other terms that are
defined in a Glossary of Terms that is available on our website at www.amtd.com (in the Investors
section under the heading Financial Reports) and is included in Item 7 of our annual report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. Since the issuance of the Form 10-K, the
definitions of Activity rate and Total trades have been updated. These updated definitions are
as follows (italics indicate other defined terms that appear elsewhere in the glossary):
Activity rate total accounts Average client trades per day during the period divided by the
average number of total accounts during the period.
Activity rate funded accounts Average client trades per day during the period divided by the
average number of funded accounts during the period.
Total trades Revenue-generating client securities trades, which are executed by the Companys
broker-dealer subsidiaries on an agency basis. Total trades are a significant source of the
Companys revenues. Such trades include, but are not limited to, trades in equities, options,
mutual funds and debt instruments. Trades generate revenue from commissions, transaction fees
and/or revenue-sharing arrangements with market destinations (also known as payment for order
flow).
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Conditions in the U.S. equity markets significantly impact the volume of our clients trading
activity. There is a direct correlation between the volume of our clients trading activity and
our results of operations. We cannot predict future trading volumes in the U.S. equity markets.
If client trading activity increases, we expect that it would have a positive impact on our results
of operations. If client trading activity declines, we expect that it would have a negative impact
on our results of operations.
Changes in average balances, especially client margin, credit, MMDA and mutual fund balances, may
significantly impact our results of operations. Changes in interest rates also impact our results
of operations. We seek to mitigate interest rate risk by aligning the average duration of our
interest-earning assets with that of our interest-bearing liabilities. We cannot predict the
direction of interest rates or the levels of client balances. If interest rates rise, we generally
expect to earn a larger net interest spread. Conversely, a falling interest rate environment
generally would result in our earning a smaller net interest spread.
20
Financial Performance Metrics
Pre-tax income, net income, earnings per share and EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization) are key metrics we use in evaluating our financial performance.
EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure.
We consider EBITDA an important measure of our financial performance and of our ability to generate
cash flows to service debt, fund capital expenditures and fund other corporate investing and
financing activities. EBITDA is used as the denominator in the consolidated leverage ratio
calculation for our senior credit facilities. The consolidated leverage ratio determines the
interest rate margin charged on the senior credit facilities. EBITDA eliminates the non-cash
effect of tangible asset depreciation and amortization and intangible asset amortization. EBITDA
should be considered in addition to, rather than as a substitute for, pre-tax income, net income
and cash flows from operating activities.
The following table sets forth EBITDA in dollars and as a percentage of net revenues for the
periods indicated and provides reconciliations to pre-tax income, which is the most directly
comparable GAAP measure (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
Six months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net |
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Revenue |
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
258,339 |
|
|
|
49.2 |
% |
|
$ |
344,194 |
|
|
|
55.3 |
% |
|
$ |
601,579 |
|
|
|
52.9 |
% |
|
$ |
747,969 |
|
|
|
59.2 |
% |
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(10,635 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
%) |
|
|
(8,887 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
%) |
|
|
(22,138 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
%) |
|
|
(16,582 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
%) |
Amortization of acquired
intangible assets |
|
|
(15,200 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
%) |
|
|
(14,749 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
%) |
|
|
(30,738 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
%) |
|
|
(28,472 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
%) |
Interest on borrowings |
|
|
(8,244 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
%) |
|
|
(20,604 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
%) |
|
|
(23,881 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
%) |
|
|
(46,330 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax income |
|
$ |
224,260 |
|
|
|
42.7 |
% |
|
$ |
299,954 |
|
|
|
48.2 |
% |
|
$ |
524,822 |
|
|
|
46.2 |
% |
|
$ |
656,585 |
|
|
|
51.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our pre-tax income and EBITDA decreased for the first half of fiscal 2009, compared to the first
half of fiscal 2008, primarily due to a 10% decrease in net revenues. The decrease in net revenues
was driven primarily by lower asset-based revenues resulting from lower net interest margin earned
on spread-based balances, partially offset by increased transaction-based revenues resulting from
higher client trading volumes. More detailed analysis of net revenues and expenses is presented
later in this discussion.
Operating Metrics
Our largest sources of revenues are asset-based revenues and transaction-based revenues. For the
six months ended March 31, 2009, asset-based revenues and transaction-based revenues accounted for
50% and 49% of our net revenues, respectively. Asset-based revenues consist of (1) net interest
revenue, (2) MMDA fees and (3) investment product fees. The primary factors driving our
asset-based revenues are average balances and average rates. Average balances consist primarily of
average client margin balances, average segregated cash balances, average client credit balances,
average client MMDA balances, average fee-based investment balances and average securities
borrowing and lending balances. Average rates consist of the average interest rates and fees
earned and paid on such balances. The primary factors driving our transaction-based revenues are
total client trades and average commissions and transaction fees per trade. We also consider
client account and client asset metrics, although we believe they are generally of less
significance to our results of operations for any particular period than our metrics for
asset-based and transaction-based revenues.
21
Asset-Based Revenue Metrics
We calculate the return on our interest-earning assets (excluding conduit-based assets) and our
MMDA balances using a measure we refer to as net interest margin. Net interest margin is
calculated for a given period by dividing the annualized sum of net interest revenue (excluding net
interest revenue from conduit-based assets) and MMDA fees by average spread-based assets.
Spread-based assets consist of client and brokerage-related asset balances, including client margin
balances, segregated cash, MMDA balances, deposits paid on securities borrowing (excluding
conduit-based assets) and other cash and interest-earning investment balances. The following table
sets forth net interest margin and average spread-based assets (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Increase/ |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Increase/ |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Avg. interest-earning assets (excluding conduit
business) |
|
$ |
7,358 |
|
|
$ |
9,880 |
|
|
$ |
(2,522 |
) |
|
$ |
7,444 |
|
|
$ |
9,719 |
|
|
$ |
(2,275 |
) |
Avg. MMDA balances |
|
|
19,272 |
|
|
|
15,510 |
|
|
|
3,762 |
|
|
|
18,577 |
|
|
|
15,381 |
|
|
|
3,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg. spread-based balances |
|
$ |
26,630 |
|
|
$ |
25,390 |
|
|
$ |
1,240 |
|
|
$ |
26,021 |
|
|
$ |
25,100 |
|
|
$ |
921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest revenue (excluding conduit business) |
|
$ |
66.7 |
|
|
$ |
134.9 |
|
|
$ |
(68.2 |
) |
|
$ |
148.8 |
|
|
$ |
280.9 |
|
|
$ |
(132.1 |
) |
MMDA fee revenue |
|
|
136.5 |
|
|
|
156.1 |
|
|
|
(19.6 |
) |
|
|
299.8 |
|
|
|
311.9 |
|
|
|
(12.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spread-based revenue |
|
$ |
203.2 |
|
|
$ |
291.0 |
|
|
$ |
(87.8 |
) |
|
$ |
448.6 |
|
|
$ |
592.8 |
|
|
$ |
(144.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg. annualized yield interest-earning assets
(excluding conduit business) |
|
|
3.63 |
% |
|
|
5.40 |
% |
|
|
(1.77 |
%) |
|
|
3.96 |
% |
|
|
5.68 |
% |
|
|
(1.72 |
%) |
Avg. annualized yield MMDA fees |
|
|
2.83 |
% |
|
|
3.98 |
% |
|
|
(1.15 |
%) |
|
|
3.19 |
% |
|
|
3.99 |
% |
|
|
(0.80 |
%) |
Net interest margin (NIM) |
|
|
3.05 |
% |
|
|
4.53 |
% |
|
|
(1.48 |
%) |
|
|
3.41 |
% |
|
|
4.65 |
% |
|
|
(1.24 |
%) |
The following tables set forth key metrics that we use in analyzing net interest revenue, which,
exclusive of the conduit business, is a component of net interest margin (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Revenue (Expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Revenue (Expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Increase/ |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Increase/ |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Segregated cash |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
Client margin balances |
|
|
49.7 |
|
|
|
135.8 |
|
|
|
(86.1 |
) |
|
|
114.5 |
|
|
|
297.9 |
|
|
|
(183.4 |
) |
Securities borrowing (excluding conduit
business) |
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
33.4 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
Other cash and interest-earning investments, net |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
(14.3 |
) |
Client credit balances |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(17.1 |
) |
|
|
14.8 |
|
Securities lending (excluding conduit business) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(16.0 |
) |
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(38.7 |
) |
|
|
36.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest revenue (excluding conduit
business) |
|
|
66.7 |
|
|
|
134.9 |
|
|
|
(68.2 |
) |
|
|
148.8 |
|
|
|
280.9 |
|
|
|
(132.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities borrowing conduit business |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
47.9 |
|
|
|
(45.7 |
) |
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
119.3 |
|
|
|
(110.7 |
) |
Securities lending conduit business |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(44.9 |
) |
|
|
43.4 |
|
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
(113.2 |
) |
|
|
108.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest revenue |
|
$ |
67.4 |
|
|
$ |
137.9 |
|
|
$ |
(70.5 |
) |
|
$ |
152.2 |
|
|
$ |
287.0 |
|
|
$ |
(134.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
% |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Segregated cash |
|
$ |
1,964 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
1,819 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Client margin balances |
|
|
3,878 |
|
|
|
8,127 |
|
|
|
(52 |
%) |
|
|
4,190 |
|
|
|
8,332 |
|
|
|
(50 |
%) |
Securities borrowing (excluding conduit business) |
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
(18 |
%) |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
(32 |
%) |
Other cash and interest-earning investments |
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
|
(11 |
%) |
|
|
1,154 |
|
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets (excluding conduit business) |
|
|
7,358 |
|
|
|
9,880 |
|
|
|
(26 |
%) |
|
|
7,444 |
|
|
|
9,719 |
|
|
|
(23 |
%) |
Securities borrowing conduit business |
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
5,760 |
|
|
|
(75 |
%) |
|
|
1,518 |
|
|
|
5,942 |
|
|
|
(74 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
8,776 |
|
|
$ |
15,640 |
|
|
|
(44 |
%) |
|
$ |
8,962 |
|
|
$ |
15,661 |
|
|
|
(43 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Client credit balances |
|
$ |
4,217 |
|
|
$ |
4,383 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
$ |
4,192 |
|
|
$ |
3,990 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Securities lending (excluding conduit business) |
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
3,302 |
|
|
|
(72 |
%) |
|
|
1,117 |
|
|
|
3,396 |
|
|
|
(67 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities (excluding conduit
business) |
|
|
5,132 |
|
|
|
7,685 |
|
|
|
(33 |
%) |
|
|
5,309 |
|
|
|
7,386 |
|
|
|
(28 |
%) |
Securities lending conduit business |
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
5,760 |
|
|
|
(75 |
%) |
|
|
1,518 |
|
|
|
5,942 |
|
|
|
(74 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities |
|
$ |
6,550 |
|
|
$ |
13,445 |
|
|
|
(51 |
%) |
|
$ |
6,827 |
|
|
$ |
13,328 |
|
|
|
(49 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg. Annualized Yield (Cost) |
|
|
|
|
|
Avg. Annualized Yield (Cost) |
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Net Yield |
|
Six months ended |
|
Net Yield |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Increase/ |
|
March 31, |
|
Increase/ |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(Decrease) |
Segregated cash |
|
|
0.14 |
% |
|
|
3.73 |
% |
|
|
(3.59 |
%) |
|
|
0.25 |
% |
|
|
3.76 |
% |
|
|
(3.51 |
%) |
Client margin balances |
|
|
5.13 |
% |
|
|
6.61 |
% |
|
|
(1.48 |
%) |
|
|
5.40 |
% |
|
|
7.03 |
% |
|
|
(1.63 |
%) |
Other cash and interest-earning investments, net |
|
|
0.36 |
% |
|
|
3.07 |
% |
|
|
(2.71 |
%) |
|
|
0.49 |
% |
|
|
3.53 |
% |
|
|
(3.04 |
%) |
Client credit balances |
|
|
(0.06 |
%) |
|
|
(0.68 |
%) |
|
|
0.62 |
% |
|
|
(0.11 |
%) |
|
|
(0.85 |
%) |
|
|
0.74 |
% |
Net interest revenue (excluding conduit
business) |
|
|
3.63 |
% |
|
|
5.40 |
% |
|
|
(1.77 |
%) |
|
|
3.96 |
% |
|
|
5.68 |
% |
|
|
(1.72 |
%) |
Securities borrowing conduit business |
|
|
0.62 |
% |
|
|
3.29 |
% |
|
|
(2.67 |
%) |
|
|
1.12 |
% |
|
|
3.95 |
% |
|
|
(2.83 |
%) |
Securities lending conduit business |
|
|
(0.42 |
%) |
|
|
(3.08 |
%) |
|
|
2.66 |
% |
|
|
(0.68 |
%) |
|
|
(3.75 |
%) |
|
|
3.07 |
% |
Net interest revenue |
|
|
3.07 |
% |
|
|
3.49 |
% |
|
|
(0.42 |
%) |
|
|
3.36 |
% |
|
|
3.60 |
% |
|
|
(0.24 |
%) |
The following table sets forth key metrics that we use in analyzing investment product fee revenues
(dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
Increase/ |
|
March 31, |
|
Increase/ |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(Decrease) |
Fee revenue |
|
$ |
48.1 |
|
|
$ |
77.7 |
|
|
$ |
(29.6 |
) |
|
$ |
117.3 |
|
|
$ |
145.7 |
|
|
$ |
(28.4 |
) |
Average balance |
|
$ |
58,933 |
|
|
$ |
70,846 |
|
|
|
(17 |
%) |
|
$ |
60,871 |
|
|
$ |
64,677 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
Average annualized
yield |
|
|
0.33 |
% |
|
|
0.43 |
% |
|
|
(0.10 |
%) |
|
|
0.38 |
% |
|
|
0.44 |
% |
|
|
(0.06 |
%) |
Transaction-Based Revenue Metrics
The following table sets forth several key metrics regarding client trading activity, which we
utilize in measuring and evaluating performance and the results of our operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
% |
|
March 31, |
|
% |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008* |
|
Change |
|
2009 |
|
2008* |
|
Change |
Total trades (in millions) |
|
|
19.82 |
|
|
|
18.36 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
42.32 |
|
|
|
37.98 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Average commissions and transaction fees per
trade |
|
$ |
13.40 |
|
|
$ |
13.34 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
13.06 |
|
|
$ |
13.30 |
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
Average client trades per day |
|
|
324,837 |
|
|
|
300,986 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
341,327 |
|
|
|
306,294 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Average client trades per account (annualized) |
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Activity rate total accounts |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
Activity rate funded accounts |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
Trading days |
|
|
61.0 |
|
|
|
61.0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
124.0 |
|
|
|
124.0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
|
Trading activity metrics for the three and six months ended March 31, 2008 have been revised to exclude non-revenue generating mutual fund trades. |
23
Client Account and Client Asset Metrics
The following table sets forth certain metrics regarding client accounts and client assets, which
we use to analyze growth and trends in our client base:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
% |
|
March 31, |
|
% |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Change |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Change |
Total accounts (beginning of period) |
|
|
7,052,000 |
|
|
|
6,475,000 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
6,895,000 |
|
|
|
6,380,000 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
New accounts opened |
|
|
194,000 |
|
|
|
214,000 |
|
|
|
(9 |
%) |
|
|
410,000 |
|
|
|
363,000 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Accounts purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,000 |
|
|
|
(100 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,000 |
|
|
|
(100 |
%) |
Accounts closed |
|
|
(51,000 |
) |
|
|
(60,000 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
%) |
|
|
(110,000 |
) |
|
|
(114,000 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts (end of period) |
|
|
7,195,000 |
|
|
|
6,731,000 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
7,195,000 |
|
|
|
6,731,000 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage change during period |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded accounts (beginning of period) |
|
|
5,013,000 |
|
|
|
4,643,000 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
4,918,000 |
|
|
|
4,597,000 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Funded accounts (end of period) |
|
|
5,105,000 |
|
|
|
4,814,000 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
5,105,000 |
|
|
|
4,814,000 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Percentage change during period |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Client assets (beginning of period, in
billions) |
|
$ |
233.8 |
|
|
$ |
300.4 |
|
|
|
(22 |
%) |
|
$ |
278.0 |
|
|
$ |
302.7 |
|
|
|
(8 |
%) |
Client assets (end of period, in billions) |
|
$ |
224.9 |
|
|
$ |
306.1 |
|
|
|
(27 |
%) |
|
$ |
224.9 |
|
|
$ |
306.1 |
|
|
|
(27 |
%) |
Percentage change during period |
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 |
%) |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net new assets (in billions) |
|
$ |
6.4 |
|
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
|
|
(7 |
%) |
|
$ |
14.3 |
|
|
$ |
16.0 |
|
|
|
(11 |
%) |
In connection with our purchase of Fiserv Trust Company on February 4, 2008, we acquired
approximately 102,000 total accounts, approximately 81,000 funded accounts and approximately $25
billion in client assets.
24
Consolidated Statements of Income Data
The following table summarizes certain data from our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
for analysis purposes (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
% |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction-based revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions and transaction fees |
|
$ |
265.4 |
|
|
$ |
244.9 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
$ |
552.6 |
|
|
$ |
505.2 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-based revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest revenue |
|
|
70.2 |
|
|
|
210.8 |
|
|
|
(67 |
%) |
|
|
162.8 |
|
|
|
461.0 |
|
|
|
(65 |
%) |
Brokerage interest expense |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(73.0 |
) |
|
|
(96 |
%) |
|
|
(10.5 |
) |
|
|
(174.1 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest revenue |
|
|
67.4 |
|
|
|
137.9 |
|
|
|
(51 |
%) |
|
|
152.2 |
|
|
|
287.0 |
|
|
|
(47 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market deposit account fees |
|
|
136.5 |
|
|
|
156.1 |
|
|
|
(13 |
%) |
|
|
299.8 |
|
|
|
311.9 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
Investment product fees |
|
|
48.1 |
|
|
|
77.7 |
|
|
|
(38 |
%) |
|
|
117.3 |
|
|
|
145.7 |
|
|
|
(20 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asset-based revenues |
|
|
252.0 |
|
|
|
371.6 |
|
|
|
(32 |
%) |
|
|
569.3 |
|
|
|
744.6 |
|
|
|
(24 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenues |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
525.5 |
|
|
|
622.9 |
|
|
|
(16 |
%) |
|
|
1,136.2 |
|
|
|
1,264.5 |
|
|
|
(10 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation and benefits |
|
|
120.8 |
|
|
|
132.1 |
|
|
|
(9 |
%) |
|
|
238.2 |
|
|
|
238.1 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
Fair value adjustments of compensation-related
derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
(100 |
%) |
Clearing and execution costs |
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
61 |
% |
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
Communications |
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Occupancy and equipment costs |
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
59.7 |
|
|
|
50.2 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
Professional services |
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
28.6 |
|
|
|
(23 |
%) |
|
|
49.4 |
|
|
|
47.9 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Interest on borrowings |
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
(60 |
%) |
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
46.3 |
|
|
|
(48 |
%) |
Other |
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
(53 |
%) |
|
|
20.3 |
|
|
|
31.0 |
|
|
|
(35 |
%) |
Advertising |
|
|
53.1 |
|
|
|
47.3 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
99.8 |
|
|
|
92.8 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
301.2 |
|
|
|
322.9 |
|
|
|
(7 |
%) |
|
|
611.4 |
|
|
|
608.6 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before other income and income taxes |
|
|
224.3 |
|
|
|
300.0 |
|
|
|
(25 |
%) |
|
|
524.8 |
|
|
|
655.9 |
|
|
|
(20 |
%) |
Other income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(100 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax income |
|
|
224.3 |
|
|
|
300.0 |
|
|
|
(25 |
%) |
|
|
524.8 |
|
|
|
656.6 |
|
|
|
(20 |
%) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
92.2 |
|
|
|
113.2 |
|
|
|
(19 |
%) |
|
|
208.4 |
|
|
|
229.0 |
|
|
|
(9 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
132.0 |
|
|
$ |
186.7 |
|
|
|
(29 |
%) |
|
$ |
316.4 |
|
|
$ |
427.6 |
|
|
|
(26 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of interest days in period |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
(1 |
%) |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
(1 |
%) |
Effective income tax rate |
|
|
41.1 |
% |
|
|
37.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39.7 |
% |
|
|
34.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Details may not sum to totals and subtotals due to rounding differences. Change percentages are based on non-rounded amounts
from the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. |
Three-Month Periods Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
Net Revenues
Commissions and transaction fees increased 8% to $265.4 million, primarily due to higher average
client trades per day. Average client trades per day increased 8% to 324,837 for the second
quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to 300,986 for the second quarter of fiscal 2008. Average client
trades per account (annualized) were 11.5 for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 and 2008. Average
commissions and transaction fees per trade increased slightly to $13.40 per trade for the second
quarter of
fiscal 2009 from $13.34 for the second quarter of fiscal 2008, primarily due to higher
payment for order flow revenue per trade, partially offset by a slightly lower percentage of option
trades during the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
25
Net interest revenue decreased 51% to $67.4 million, due primarily to a 52% decrease in average
client margin balances, a decrease of 148 basis points on the average yield earned on client margin
balances and a decrease of 271 basis points in the average yield earned on other cash and
interest-earning investments for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to the second quarter
of fiscal 2008. These decreases were partially offset by a $17.5 million increase in net interest
revenue from our securities borrowing/lending program and a decrease of 62 basis points in the
average interest rate paid on client credit balances in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 compared
to the second quarter of fiscal 2008.
MMDA fees decreased 13% to $136.5 million, due primarily to a decrease of 115 basis points in the
average yield earned on the client MMDA assets, partially offset by a 24% increase in average MMDA
balances during the second quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2008.
Investment product fees decreased 38% to $48.1 million, primarily due to a 17% decrease in average
fee-based investment balances and a decrease of 10 basis points in the average yield earned in the
second quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2008. The decrease in the
average yield earned in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 was primarily due to our decision to
voluntarily begin waiving fees on certain money market mutual funds during the first quarter of
fiscal 2009 in order to prevent our clients yields on such funds from becoming negative.
Over the next 12 months, we expect to migrate approximately $10 to $14 billion of client cash that
is currently held in client credit balances or swept to money market mutual funds into the MMDA
offering. This migration is expected to result in an increase in MMDA fee revenues and a decrease
in investment product fee revenues, but is not expected to have a material impact on overall net
revenues during fiscal 2009. We expect this migration to position the Company to earn higher net
revenues if interest rates begin to rise.
Other revenues increased 26% to $8.0 million, primarily due to increased fees from corporate
reorganizations of issuers in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to the second quarter of
fiscal 2008.
Expenses
Employee compensation and benefits expense decreased 9% to $120.8 million, due primarily to lower
incentive-based compensation related to actual Company and individual performance, partially offset
by higher average headcount resulting from our fiscal 2008 growth initiatives compared to the
second quarter of fiscal 2008 and approximately $4.0 million of severance costs related to staff
reductions during the second quarter of fiscal 2009. The average number of full-time equivalent
employees was 4,570 for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to 4,360 for the second quarter
of fiscal 2008. During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, our full-time equivalent employee
headcount was reduced by 150 positions to 4,529 as of March 31, 2009 as a result of the staff
reductions.
Clearing and execution costs increased 61% to $15.1 million, due primarily to higher client trading
volumes and less favorable annual rebates from clearing organizations during the second quarter of
fiscal 2009 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2008.
Communications expense increased 2% to $17.9 million, due primarily to increased costs for quotes
and market information related to the higher client trading volume during the second quarter of
fiscal 2009.
Occupancy and equipment costs increased 17% to $29.5 million due to higher costs for technology
infrastructure and facilities resulting from our fiscal 2008 growth initiatives.
Depreciation and amortization increased 20% to $10.6 million, due primarily to increased
depreciation on technology infrastructure upgrades and leasehold improvements resulting from our
fiscal 2008 growth initiatives.
Amortization of acquired intangible assets increased 3% to $15.2 million, due to amortization of
the client relationship intangible asset recorded in the acquisition of Fiserv Trust Company during
the second quarter of fiscal 2008.
Professional services decreased 23% to $22.1 million, primarily due to fees incurred under the
transition services agreements related to the acquisition of Fiserv Trust Company during the second
quarter of fiscal 2008 and due to lower usage of consulting and contract services during the second
quarter of fiscal 2009.
Interest on borrowings decreased 60% to $8.2 million, due primarily to lower average interest rates
incurred on our debt during the second quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to the second quarter of
fiscal 2008. The average interest rate incurred on our debt was 2.00% for the second quarter of
fiscal 2009, compared to 5.29% for the second quarter of fiscal 2008.
Other expenses decreased 53% to $8.7 million primarily due to lower bad debt and other
client-related trading losses in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to the second quarter
of fiscal 2008.
26
Advertising expense increased 12% to $53.1 million during the second quarter of fiscal 2009
compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2008. We generally adjust our level of advertising
spending in relation to stock market activity and other market conditions in an effort to maximize
the number of new accounts while minimizing the advertising cost per new account.
Our effective income tax rate was 41.1% for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to 37.8% for
the second quarter of fiscal 2008. The effective tax rate for the second quarter of fiscal 2009
was unusually high due to unfavorable deferred income tax adjustments of $6.0 million resulting
from recent state income tax law changes and capital loss limitations on our Reserve Primary Fund
holdings. These items unfavorably impacted our earnings for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 by
approximately $0.01 per share. We expect our effective income tax rate to be approximately 39% for
the remainder of fiscal 2009. However, we expect that accounting under FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN No. 48), will result in increased volatility in
our quarterly and annual effective income tax rate because FIN No. 48 requires that any change in
measurement of a tax position taken in a prior tax year be recognized as a discrete event in the
period in which it occurs.
Six-Month Periods Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
Net Revenues
Commissions and transaction fees increased 9% to $552.6 million, primarily due to higher average
client trades per day, partially offset by lower commissions and transaction fees per trade.
Average client trades per day increased 11% to 341,327 for the first half of fiscal 2009 compared
to 306,294 for the first half of fiscal 2008. Average client trades per account
(annualized) were 12.2 for the first half of fiscal 2009 compared to 11.8 for the first half of
fiscal 2008. Average commissions and transaction fees per trade decreased 2% to $13.06 per trade
for the first half of fiscal 2009 from $13.30 for the first half of fiscal 2008, primarily due to a
lower percentage of option trades and an increase in promotional trades related to our new account
growth during the first half of fiscal 2009, partially offset by higher payment for order flow
revenue per trade during the first half of fiscal 2009.
Net interest revenue decreased 47% to $152.2 million, due primarily to a 50% decrease in client
margin balances, a decrease of 163 basis points on the average yield earned on client margin
balances and a decrease of 304 basis points in the average yield earned on other cash and
interest-earning investments for the first half of fiscal 2009 compared to the first half of fiscal
2008. These decreases were partially offset by a $46.0 million increase in net interest revenue
from our securities borrowing/lending program and a decrease of 74 basis points in the average
interest rate paid on client credit balances in the first half of fiscal 2009 compared to the first
half of fiscal 2008.
MMDA fees decreased 4% to $299.8 million, due primarily to a decrease of 80 basis points in the
average yield earned on the client MMDA assets, partially offset by a 21% increase in average MMDA
balances during the first half of fiscal 2009 compared to the first half of fiscal 2008.
Investment product fees decreased 20% to $117.3 million, primarily due to a decrease of 6 basis
points in the average yield earned and a 6% decrease in average fee-based investment balances for
the first half of fiscal 2009 compared to the first half of fiscal 2008.
Other revenues decreased 2% to $14.4 million, primarily due to decreased fees from corporate
reorganizations of issuers in the first half of fiscal 2009 compared to the first half of fiscal
2008.
Expenses
Employee compensation and benefits expense increased slightly to $238.2 million, due primarily to
an increase in average headcount resulting from our fiscal 2008 growth initiatives and
approximately $4.2 million of severance costs related to staff reductions during the first half of
fiscal 2009, mostly offset by lower incentive-based compensation related to actual Company and
individual performance compared to the first half of fiscal 2008. The average number of full-time
equivalent employees was 4,609 for the first half of fiscal 2009 compared to 4,191 in the first
half of 2008. However, our full-time equivalent employee headcount was reduced to 4,529 as of
March 31, 2009 as a result of the staff reductions.
Clearing and execution costs increased 43% to $30.7 million, due primarily to higher client trading
volumes and less favorable annual rebates from clearing organizations during the first half of
fiscal 2009 compared to the first half of fiscal 2008.
Communications expense increased 5% to $36.6 million, due primarily to increased costs for quotes
and market information related to the higher client trading volume during the first half of fiscal
2009.
Occupancy and equipment costs increased 19% to $59.7 million due to higher costs for technology
infrastructure and facilities resulting from our fiscal 2008 growth initiatives.
Depreciation and amortization increased 34% to $22.1 million, due primarily to increased
depreciation on technology infrastructure upgrades and leasehold improvements resulting from our
fiscal 2008 growth initiatives.
27
Amortization of acquired intangible assets increased 8% to $30.7 million, due to amortization of
the client relationship intangible asset recorded in the acquisition of Fiserv Trust Company during
the second quarter of fiscal 2008.
Professional services increased 3% to $49.4 million, primarily due to higher usage of consulting
and contract services during the first half of fiscal 2009 in connection with new product
development and technology infrastructure upgrades related to our growth initiatives. This
increase was partially offset by fees incurred during the second quarter of fiscal 2008 under the
transition services agreements related to the acquisition of Fiserv Trust Company.
Interest on borrowings decreased 48% to $23.9 million, due primarily to lower average interest
rates incurred on our debt during the first half of fiscal 2009 compared to the first half of
fiscal 2008. The average interest rate incurred on our debt was 3.00% for the first half of fiscal
2009, compared to 5.89% for the first half of fiscal 2008.
Other expenses decreased 35% to $20.3 million primarily due to lower bad debt and other
client-related trading losses in the first half of fiscal 2009 compared to the first half quarter
of fiscal 2008.
Advertising expense increased 8% to $99.8 million during the first half of fiscal 2009 compared to
the first half of fiscal 2008, primarily due to increased spending in response to competitive
market share opportunities.
Our effective income tax rate was 39.7% for the first half of fiscal 2009 compared to 34.9% for the
first half of fiscal 2008. The effective income tax rate for the first half of fiscal 2009 was
higher than normal due to unfavorable deferred income tax adjustments of $5.9 million resulting
from recent state income tax law changes and capital loss limitations on our Reserve
Primary Fund holdings. These items unfavorably impacted our earnings for the first half of fiscal
2009 by approximately $0.01 per share. The effective income tax rate for the first half of fiscal
2008 was unusually low due primarily to $7.2 million of favorable resolutions of state income tax
matters and $11.1 million of adjustments to current and deferred income taxes resulting from a
revision to estimated state income tax expense. The revision was based on our actual state income
tax returns filed for calendar year 2006 and similar adjustments applied to estimated state income
tax rates for 2007 and future years. These items favorably impacted our earnings for the first
half of fiscal 2008 by approximately $0.03 per share.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We have historically financed our liquidity and capital needs primarily through the use of funds
generated from operations and from borrowings under our credit agreements. We have also issued
common stock and long-term debt to finance mergers and acquisitions and for other corporate
purposes. Our liquidity needs during the first half of fiscal 2009 were financed primarily from
our earnings and cash on hand. We plan to finance our operational capital and liquidity needs
during the remainder of fiscal 2009 primarily from our earnings, cash and short-term investments on
hand and, if necessary, borrowings on our parent company and broker-dealer credit facilities.
As of September 30, 2008, we had holdings with a fair value of approximately $585.5 million in the
Primary Fund, a money market mutual fund managed by The Reserve, an independent mutual fund
company. During September 2008, the net asset value of the Primary Fund declined below $1.00 per
share and the fund announced it was liquidating under the supervision of the SEC. In order to
facilitate an orderly liquidation, the SEC allowed the fund to suspend redemptions until the fund
could liquidate portfolio securities without further impairing the net asset value. From October
31, 2008 through April 17, 2009, we have received $534.5 million of cash as The Reserve redeemed
approximately 90% of the shares of the fund. We cannot predict when The Reserve will redeem the
remaining shares of the fund.
Dividends from our subsidiaries are a source of liquidity for the parent company. Some of our
subsidiaries are subject to requirements of the SEC, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
(FINRA) and other regulators relating to liquidity, capital standards and the use of client funds
and securities, which may limit funds available for the payment of dividends to the parent company.
Under the SECs Uniform Net Capital Rule (Rule 15c3-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the Exchange Act)), our broker-dealer subsidiaries are required to maintain, at all times, at
least the minimum level of net capital required under Rule 15c3-1. For clearing broker-dealers,
this minimum net capital level is determined by a calculation described in Rule 15c3-1 that is
primarily based on each broker-dealers aggregate debits, which primarily are a function of
client margin balances at our clearing broker-dealer subsidiary. Since our aggregate debits may
fluctuate significantly, our minimum net capital requirements may also fluctuate significantly from
period to period. The parent company may make cash capital contributions to broker-dealer
subsidiaries, if necessary, to meet minimum net capital requirements.
Liquid Assets
We consider liquid assets an important measure of our liquidity and of our ability to fund
corporate investing and financing activities. Liquid assets is a non-GAAP financial measure. We
define liquid assets as the sum of (a) corporate cash and cash equivalents, (b) corporate
short-term investments, (c) regulatory net capital of (i) our clearing broker-dealer subsidiary in
28
excess of 5% of aggregate debit items and (ii) our introducing broker-dealer subsidiary in excess
of 120% of the minimum dollar net capital requirement and (d) Tier 1 capital of our trust company
in excess of the minimum dollar requirement. We include the excess capital of our broker-dealer
and trust company subsidiaries in liquid assets, rather than simply including broker-dealer and
trust cash and cash equivalents, because capital requirements may limit the amount of cash
available for dividend from the broker-dealer and trust subsidiaries to the parent company. Excess
capital, as defined under clauses (c) and (d) above, is generally available for dividend from the
broker-dealer and trust subsidiaries to the parent company. Liquid assets should be considered as
a supplemental measure of liquidity, rather than as a substitute for cash and cash equivalents.
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents, which is the most
directly comparable GAAP measure, to liquid assets (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,072,642 |
|
|
$ |
674,135 |
|
|
$ |
398,507 |
|
Less: |
|
Broker-dealer cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(565,493 |
) |
|
|
(418,626 |
) |
|
|
(146,867 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Trust company cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(38,203 |
) |
|
|
(61,430 |
) |
|
|
23,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory cash and cash
equivalents |
|
|
(14,273 |
) |
|
|
(9,447 |
) |
|
|
(4,826 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
454,673 |
|
|
|
184,632 |
|
|
|
270,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plus: |
|
Corporate short-term investments |
|
|
75,392 |
|
|
|
14,491 |
|
|
|
60,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
Excess trust Tier 1 capital |
|
|
7,637 |
|
|
|
102,427 |
|
|
|
(94,790 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess broker-dealer regulatory net capital |
|
|
613,644 |
|
|
|
486,625 |
|
|
|
127,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquid assets |
|
$ |
1,151,346 |
|
|
$ |
788,175 |
|
|
$ |
363,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in liquid assets is summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquid assets as of September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
788,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plus: |
|
Pre-tax income |
|
|
524,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by stock option exercises |
|
|
1,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of other investments available-for-sale |
|
|
1,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction in net capital requirements due to decrease in
aggregate debits |
|
|
181,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other changes in working capital and regulatory net capital |
|
|
278,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
|
(112,328 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
|
(25,259 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(465,403 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
|
(20,919 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquid assets as of March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,151,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Repurchase Program
On August 2, 2006, our board of directors authorized a program to repurchase up to 12 million
shares of our common stock in the open market and in block trades. On November 15, 2006, the board
of directors added 20 million shares to the original authorization, increasing the total
authorization to 32 million shares.
On January 8, 2009, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire thinkorswim for approximately
28 million shares of Company common stock and approximately $225 million in cash. In connection
with the acquisition and in addition to the existing program, our board of directors authorized the
Company to repurchase up to 28.3 million shares of its common stock, which was intended to be
approximately equal to the number of shares to be issued in the acquisition.
On February 17, 2009, we entered into a stock purchase agreement with Marlene M. Ricketts and the
Joe and Marlene Ricketts Grandchildrens Trust to purchase approximately 34 million shares of
common stock of the Company for approximately $403 million in cash ($11.85 per share). The
purchase and sale of the stock occurred on February 20, 2009. The number of shares of common stock
under the stock purchase agreement consisted of approximately 4.4 million shares remaining under
the 2006 stock repurchase program, 28.3 million shares that were authorized to be repurchased in
connection with the thinkorswim acquisition and approximately 1.3 million of incremental shares
authorized by our board of directors at the time of the stock purchase agreement.
29
During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we repurchased a total of approximately 35.5 million
shares at a weighted-average purchase price of $11.88 per share under the stock repurchase programs
and stock purchase agreement described above. From the inception of the 2006 stock repurchase
program through the completion of our stock repurchase programs in February 2009, we repurchased a
total of approximately 61.6 million shares at a weighted-average purchase price of $13.94 per share
under the stock repurchase programs and stock purchase agreement described above. We currently
have no plans for further stock repurchase programs.
Contractual Obligations
The following items constitute material changes in our contractual obligations outside the ordinary
course of business since September 30, 2008:
On January 8, 2009, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire thinkorswim for approximately
28 million shares of Company common stock and approximately $225 million in cash. The closing of
the acquisition is subject to customary conditions, including regulatory and thinkorswim
stockholder approvals, and is expected to occur during fiscal 2009.
On February 4, 2008, we completed the acquisition of Fiserv Trust Company, an investment support
services business and wholly-owned subsidiary of Fiserv, Inc. (Fiserv). Pursuant to the stock
purchase agreement, an earn-out payment of up to $100 million in cash could be payable following
the first anniversary of the acquisition based on the achievement of revenue targets. Based on
revenues through the February 4, 2009 anniversary date, we calculated the earn-out payment
obligation to be approximately $41.3 million and we expect the payment will be made during fiscal
2009. The calculation of the earn-out payment is subject to Fiservs review and is subject to
offset by any amounts owed by Fiserv before it can be finalized and paid.
Our income taxes payable increased from approximately $243.0 million as of September 30, 2008 to
approximately $462.5 million as of March 31, 2009. Income taxes payable as of March 31, 2009
primarily consists of liabilities for uncertain tax positions and related interest and penalties.
The timing of payments, if any, on liabilities for uncertain tax positions cannot be predicted with
reasonable accuracy.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We enter into guarantees and other off-balance sheet arrangements in the ordinary course of
business, primarily to meet the needs of our clients and manage our asset-based revenues. For
information on these arrangements, see the following sections under Item 1, Financial Statements
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements: Guarantees under Note 9 COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES and Money Market Deposit Account Agreement under Note 13 RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS. The MMDA agreement accounts for a significant percentage of our revenues (26% of our
net revenues for the six months ended March 31, 2009) and enables our clients to invest in an
FDIC-insured deposit product without the need for the Company to maintain a bank charter.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
SFAS No. 157 On October 1, 2008, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 157, Fair Value Measurements for financial assets and liabilities and nonfinancial assets and
liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a
recurring basis. We will not adopt this statement until October 1, 2009 for nonfinancial assets
and liabilities that are not recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a
recurring basis. SFAS No. 157 clarifies the definition of fair value and the methods used to
measure fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The adoption of SFAS No.
157 did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
See Note 10 FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES for additional information.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
SFAS No. 141R In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business
Combinations. SFAS No. 141R generally requires an acquirer to recognize the identifiable assets
acquired, liabilities assumed, contingent purchase consideration and any noncontrolling interest in
the acquiree at fair value on the date of acquisition. It also requires an acquirer to recognize
as expense most transaction and restructuring costs as incurred, rather than include such items in
the cost of the acquired entity. For the Company, SFAS No. 141R will apply prospectively to
business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after October 1, 2009. We will
evaluate the impact of SFAS No. 141R on any potential future business combinations that may occur
on or after the effective date.
30
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market risk generally represents the risk of loss that may result from the potential change in the
value of a financial instrument as a result of fluctuations in interest rates and market prices. We
have established policies, procedures and internal processes governing our management of market
risks in the normal course of our business operations. We do not hold any material market
risk-sensitive instruments for trading purposes.
Credit Risk
Two primary sources of credit risk inherent in our business are client margin lending and
securities lending and borrowing. We manage risk on client margin lending by requiring clients to
maintain margin collateral in compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines. We monitor
required margin levels daily and, pursuant to such guidelines, require our clients to deposit
additional collateral, or to reduce positions, when necessary. We continuously monitor client
accounts to detect excessive concentration, large orders or positions, patterns of day trading and
other activities that indicate increased risk to us. We manage risks associated with our
securities lending and borrowing activities by requiring credit approvals for counterparties, by
monitoring the market value of securities loaned and collateral values for securities borrowed on a
daily basis and requiring additional cash as collateral for securities loaned or return of
collateral for securities borrowed when necessary and by participating in a risk-sharing program
offered through the Options Clearing Corporation.
Interest Rate Risk
As a fundamental part of our brokerage business, we invest in interest-earning assets and are
obligated on interest-bearing liabilities. In addition, we earn fees on our MMDA sweep arrangement
with TD Bank USA, which are subject to interest rate risk. Changes in interest rates could affect
the interest earned on assets differently than interest paid on liabilities. A rising interest
rate environment generally results in our earning a larger net interest spread. Conversely, a
falling interest rate environment generally results in our earning a smaller net interest spread.
Our most prevalent form of interest rate risk is referred to as gap risk. This risk occurs when
the interest rates we earn on our assets change at a different frequency or amount than the
interest rates we pay on our liabilities. We have an Asset/Liability Committee as the governance
body with the responsibility of managing interest rate risk, including gap risk.
We use net interest simulation modeling techniques to evaluate the effect that changes in interest
rates might have on pre-tax income. Our model includes all interest-sensitive assets and
liabilities of the Company and interest-sensitive assets and liabilities associated with the MMDA
agreement. The simulations involve assumptions that are inherently uncertain and, as a result,
cannot precisely predict the impact that changes in interest rates will have on pre-tax income.
Actual results may differ from simulated results due to differences in timing and frequency of rate
changes, changes in market conditions and changes in management strategy that lead to changes in
the mix of interest-sensitive assets and liabilities.
The weighted average federal funds rate for fiscal 2008 was 2.96%. Since September 30, 2008, the
Federal Open Market Committee has lowered the federal funds rate to between 0% and 0.25%. We
estimate that this lower interest rate environment,
along with changes in the mix of our average spread-based balances and market-driven reductions in
our average fee-based investment balances, could reduce our asset-based revenues by $215 million to
$450 million and our pre-tax income by $175 million to $410 million for the full fiscal year 2009
compared to fiscal 2008.
In addition to the analysis above related to the actual decreases in short-term interest rates, we
have performed a simulation of a hypothetical increase in interest rates. This simulation assumes
that the asset and liability structure of the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and the MMDA
arrangement would not be changed as a result of a simulated change in interest rates. The result
of the simulation based on our financial position as of March 31, 2009 indicates that a gradual 1%
(100 basis points) increase in interest rates over a 12-month period would result in approximately
$39 million higher pre-tax income.
Other Market Risks
Our revenues and financial instruments are denominated in U.S. dollars. We generally do not invest
in derivative instruments, except for economic hedging purposes.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, performed an
evaluation of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31,
2009. Management, including the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2009.
31
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the
most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Part II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Spam Litigation A purported class action, captioned Elvey v. TD Ameritrade, Inc., was filed on
May 31, 2007 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The
complaint alleges that there was a breach in TDA Inc.s systems, which allowed access to e-mail
addresses and other personal information of account holders, and that as a result account holders
received unsolicited e-mail from spammers promoting certain stocks and have been subjected to an
increased risk of identity theft. The complaint requests unspecified damages and injunctive and
other equitable relief. A second lawsuit, captioned Zigler v. TD Ameritrade, Inc., was filed on
September 26, 2007, in the same jurisdiction on behalf of a purported nationwide class of account
holders. The factual allegations of the complaint and the relief sought are substantially the same
as those in the first lawsuit. The cases were consolidated under the caption In re TD Ameritrade
Accountholders Litigation. The Company hired an independent consultant to investigate whether
identity theft occurred as a result of the breach. The consultant has conducted four investigations
since August 2007 and reported that it found no evidence of identity theft. The parties entered
into an agreement to settle the lawsuits on a class basis subject to court approval. On May 1,
2009, the Court granted preliminary approval of the proposed settlement, which had been revised,
and set a hearing on final approval for September 10, 2009. The settlement is not expected to have
a material effect on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Auction Rate Securities Matters Beginning in March 2008, lawsuits were filed against various
financial services firms by customers related to their investments in auction rate securities
(ARS). The plaintiffs in these lawsuits allege that the defendants made material
misrepresentations and omissions in statements to customers about investments in ARS and the manner
in which the ARS market functioned in violation of provisions of the federal securities laws. Two
purported class action complaints have been filed alleging such conduct with respect to TDA Inc.
and TD AMERITRADE Holding Corporation. The cases, which are pending in the U.S. District Court for
the Southern District of New York, have been consolidated under the caption In re Humphrys v. TD
Ameritrade Holding Corp. An amended complaint was filed in February 2009. The amended complaint
seeks an unspecified amount of compensatory damages, equitable relief, interest and attorneys
fees. In April 2009, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint.
The SEC and other regulatory authorities are conducting investigations regarding the sale of ARS.
TDA Inc. has received subpoenas and other requests for documents and information from the
regulatory authorities. The Company is cooperating with the investigations and requests. The
Company and regulatory authorities are in discussions regarding the possible resolution of the
investigations with respect to TDA Inc., which could include the Company offering to purchase
certain client ARS over
time. As of May 1, 2009, the Companys clients held ARS with an aggregate par value of
approximately $691 million in TDA Inc. accounts, including $190 million custodied for clients of
independent registered investment advisors.
Reserve Fund Matters During September 2008, The Reserve, an independent mutual fund company,
announced that the net asset value of two of its money market mutual funds (the Primary Fund and
the International Liquidity Fund) declined below $1.00 per share. In addition, The Reserve
announced that the net asset value of the Reserve Yield Plus Fund, which is not a money market
mutual fund but sought to maintain a stable net asset value of $1.00 per share, declined below
$1.00 per share. TDA Inc.s clients hold shares in these funds, which The Reserve announced are
being liquidated. From October 31, 2008 through May 1, 2009, Primary Fund, International Liquidity
Fund and Yield Plus Fund shareholders have received distributions totaling approximately $0.90 per
share, $0.65 per share and $0.85 per share, respectively. The SEC and other regulatory authorities
are conducting investigations regarding TDA Inc.s offering of The Reserve funds to clients. TDA
Inc. has received subpoenas and other requests for documents and information from the regulatory
authorities. TDA Inc. is cooperating with the investigations and requests.
In November and December 2008 two purported class action lawsuits were filed with respect to the
Yield Plus Fund. The lawsuits are captioned Ross v. Reserve Management Company, Inc. et al. in the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and Hamilton v. TD Ameritrade, Inc. et
al. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The plaintiff in the Hamilton
case dismissed his complaint without prejudice on March 2, 2009. The Ross lawsuit is on behalf of
32
persons who purchased shares of Reserve Yield Plus Fund. The complaint names as defendants a
number of entities and individuals related to The Reserve. The Company is also named as a
defendant. The complaint alleges claims of violations of the federal securities laws and other
claims based on allegations that false and misleading statements and omissions were made in the
Reserve Yield Plus Fund prospectus and in other statements regarding the fund. The complaint seeks
an unspecified amount of compensatory damages, interest and attorneys fees.
Other Legal and Regulatory Matters The Company is subject to lawsuits, arbitrations, claims and
other legal proceedings in connection with its business. Some of the legal actions include claims
for substantial or unspecified compensatory and/or punitive damages. A substantial adverse
judgment or other unfavorable resolution of these matters could have a material adverse effect on
the Companys financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Management believes the
Company has adequate legal defenses with respect to the legal proceedings to which it is a
defendant or respondent and the outcome of these pending proceedings is not likely to have a
material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the
Company. However, the Company is unable to predict the outcome of these matters.
In the normal course of business, the Company discusses matters with its regulators raised during
regulatory examinations or otherwise subject to their inquiry. These matters could result in
censures, fines or other sanctions. Management believes the outcome of any resulting actions will
not be material to the Companys financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
However, the Company is unable to predict the outcome of these matters.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider
the factors discussed under Item 1A Risk Factors in our annual report on Form 10-K, as
amended, for the year ended September 30, 2008, which could materially affect our business,
financial condition or future results of operations. The risks described in our Form 10-K, as
amended, are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known
to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition or results of operations.
There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in the Companys Form
10-K, as amended, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
of Shares that May |
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
Yet Be Purchased |
|
Period |
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
Paid per Share |
|
|
Announced Program |
|
|
Under the Program |
|
January 1, 2009 - January 31, 2009 |
|
|
945,960 |
|
|
$ |
12.63 |
|
|
|
945,088 |
|
|
|
33,240,741 |
|
February 1, 2009 - February 28, 2009 |
|
|
34,544,800 |
|
|
$ |
11.86 |
|
|
|
33,240,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2009 - March 31, 2009 |
|
|
516,877 |
|
|
$ |
11.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Three months ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
36,007,637 |
|
|
$ |
11.88 |
|
|
|
34,185,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On August 2, 2006, our board of directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to 12
million shares. On November 15, 2006, the board of directors added 20 million shares to the
original authorization, increasing the total authorization to 32 million shares.
On January 8, 2009, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire thinkorswim for approximately
28 million shares of Company common stock and approximately $225 million in cash. In connection
with the acquisition and in addition to the existing program, our board of directors authorized the
Company to repurchase up to 28.3 million shares of its common stock, which was intended to be
approximately equal to the number of shares to be issued in the acquisition.
On February 17, 2009, we entered into a stock purchase agreement with Marlene M. Ricketts and the
Joe and Marlene Ricketts Grandchildrens Trust to purchase approximately 34 million shares of
common stock of the Company for $11.85 per share. The purchase and sale of the stock occurred on
February 20, 2009. The number of shares of common stock under the stock purchase agreement
consisted of approximately 4.4 million shares remaining under the 2006 stock repurchase program,
28.3 million shares that were authorized to be repurchased in connection with the thinkorswim
acquisition and approximately 1.3 million of incremental shares authorized by our board of
directors at the time of the stock purchase agreement.
As of February 20, 2009, all the shares authorized under our stock repurchase programs had been
repurchased and the stock repurchase programs were complete.
33
During the month ended January 31, 2009, 872 shares were repurchased from employees for income tax
withholding in connection with stock distributions under the Companys Executive Deferred
Compensation Program. All of the shares purchased during the month ended March 31, 2009, were
repurchased from employees for income tax withholding in connection with restricted stock unit
distributions.
The following table summarizes common stock purchases reported by TD on a Form 4 during the
quarter covered by this report:
AFFILIATE PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
of Shares that May |
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
Yet Be Purchased |
|
Period |
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
Paid per Share |
|
|
Announced Program |
|
|
Under the Program |
|
January 1, 2009 - January 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2009 - February 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2009 - March 31, 2009 |
|
|
27,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
19.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Three months ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
27,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
19.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under the terms of the Stockholders Agreement among TD, the Company and certain other
stockholders, the limitation on TDs ownership of the Companys common stock increased from 39.9%
of the outstanding shares to 45% effective January 24, 2009. On March 2, 2009, TD purchased 27
million shares of Company common stock for approximately $19.08 per share, in settlement of a
hedging arrangement with a third party. TD, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into the
hedging agreement on September 14, 2006 for the purpose of hedging the price of 27 million shares
of the Companys common stock. TD owns approximately 47.6% of the Companys common stock as of
March 31, 2009, of which 45% is permitted to be voted under the terms of the Stockholders
Agreement.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The Company held its Annual Meeting of Stockholders on February 18, 2009. Four persons were
nominated by the Companys board of directors to serve as Class I directors for terms of three
years and one person was nominated by the board of directors to serve as a Class III director for a
term of two years. There was no solicitation in opposition to the nominees proposed to be elected
in the Proxy Statement. The following sets forth the results of the election of directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Nominee |
|
Director Class |
|
FOR |
|
WITHHELD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Edmund Clark |
|
|
I |
|
|
|
419,164,226 |
|
|
|
112,190,502 |
|
Mark L. Mitchell |
|
|
I |
|
|
|
464,208,704 |
|
|
|
67,146,024 |
|
Joseph H. Moglia |
|
|
III |
|
|
|
448,482,940 |
|
|
|
82,871,788 |
|
Thomas S. Ricketts |
|
|
I |
|
|
|
448,620,783 |
|
|
|
82,733,945 |
|
Fredric J. Tomczyk |
|
|
I |
|
|
|
450,263,777 |
|
|
|
81,090,951 |
|
A proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors for the
fiscal year ending September 30, 2009, was approved as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ABSTENSIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AND BROKER |
FOR |
|
AGAINST |
|
NON-VOTES |
531,059,961 |
|
|
210,573 |
|
|
|
85,294 |
|
34
Item 6. Exhibits
|
3.1 |
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of TD AMERITRADE Holding
Corporation, dated January 24, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the
Companys Form 8-K filed on January 27, 2006) |
|
|
3.2 |
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of TD AMERITRADE Holding Corporation, effective
March 9, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Form 8-K filed
on March 15, 2006) |
|
|
10.1 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 8, 2009, by and among TD
AMERITRADE Holding Corporation, Tango Acquisition Corporation One, Tango Acquisition
Corporation Two and thinkorswim Group Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
of the Companys Form 8-K filed on January 14, 2009) |
|
|
10.2 |
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 17, 2009, by and between TD
AMERITRADE Holding Corporation, Marlene M. Ricketts and the Joe and Marlene Ricketts
Grandchildrens Trust |
|
|
10.3 |
|
Executive Employment Term Sheet, dated as of January 14, 2009, between TD
AMERITRADE Holding Corporation and Peter J. Sidebottom |
|
|
15.1 |
|
Awareness Letter of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Fredric J. Tomczyk, Principal Executive Officer, as required
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of William J. Gerber, Principal Financial Officer, as required
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
35
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: May 8, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
TD AMERITRADE Holding Corporation
(Registrant)
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ FREDRIC J. TOMCZYK
|
|
|
|
Fredric J. Tomczyk |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ WILLIAM J. GERBER
|
|
|
|
William J. Gerber |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
36