================================================================================
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|X| QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2002
OR
| | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 000-28467
Z-TEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 59-3501119
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
601 SOUTH HARBOUR ISLAND BOULEVARD, SUITE 220
TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602
(813) 273-6261
(Address, including zip code, and
telephone number including area code, of
Registrant's principal executive offices)
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT: NONE
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT: COMMON
STOCK, PAR VALUE $.01 PER SHARE, PREFERRED STOCK PURCHASE RIGHTS
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No [ ]
The number of shares of the Registrant's Common Stock outstanding as of
August 12, 2002 was approximately 35,191,734.
================================================================================
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2002 and
December 31, 2001........................................... 3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001......................... 4
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Deficit
for the six months ended June 30, 2002...................... 5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months
ended June 30, 2002 and 2001................................ 6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.................. 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations................................... 14
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.. 26
PART II.
Item 1. Legal Proceedings........................................... 26
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders......... 27
Item 6. Exhibits, and Reports on Form 8-K........................... 27
Signatures.................................................................. 31
2
Z-TEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
2002 2001
----------- ------------
(UNAUDITED)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 9,113 $ 18,892
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $22,982 and $17,064 29,000 27,042
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 4,225 3,961
--------- ---------
Total current assets 42,338 49,895
Property and equipment, net 56,325 56,231
Intangible assets, net 5,031 5,945
Other assets 6,871 4,666
--------- ---------
Total assets $ 110,565 $ 116,737
========= =========
LIABILITIES, MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED
STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $ 46,862 $ 49,622
Deferred revenue 9,808 5,951
Current portion of long-term debt
and capital lease obligations 6,096 6,305
--------- ---------
Total current liabilities 62,766 61,878
Deferred revenue 3,389 --
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations 6,877 9,461
--------- ---------
Total liabilities 73,032 71,339
--------- ---------
Mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred stock, $.01 par value;
50,000,000 shares authorized; 8,855,089 issued and outstanding
(aggregate liquidation value of $140,143 and $135,298) 120,379 112,570
--------- ---------
Stockholders' deficit:
Common stock, $.01 par value; 150,000,000
shares authorized; 35,533,284 and 34,341,855 shares issued;
35,191,734 and 34,000,305 outstanding, respectively 355 343
Notes receivable from stockholders (1,589) (1,589)
Unearned stock compensation (55) (122)
Additional paid-in capital 212,377 217,782
Accumulated deficit (293,546) (283,198)
Treasury stock, 341,550 shares at cost (388) (388)
--------- ---------
Total stockholders' deficit (82,846) (67,172)
--------- ---------
Total liabilities, mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred
stock and stockholders' deficit $ 110,565 $ 116,737
========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
3
Z-TEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)
(UNAUDITED)
THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
-------------------------- --------------------------
2002 2001 2002 2001
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Revenues $ 62,224 $ 73,142 $ 119,493 $ 148,186
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Operating expenses:
Network operations 17,090 41,718 44,333 85,020
Sales and marketing 2,341 8,873 7,100 21,634
General and administrative 32,445 64,752 62,287 97,322
Asset impairment charge 1,129 59,194 1,129 59,194
Wholesale development costs -- -- 1,018 --
Restructuring charge 1,861 -- 1,861 --
Depreciation and amortization 6,003 6,483 11,582 12,524
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total operating expenses 60,869 181,020 129,310 275,694
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Operating income (loss) 1,355 (107,878) (9,817) (127,508)
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Nonoperating income (loss):
Interest and other income 307 1,352 1,484 4,270
Interest and other expense (1,403) (1,217) (2,015) (2,085)
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total nonoperating income (loss) (1,096) 135 (531) 2,185
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net income (loss) 259 (107,743) (10,348) (125,323)
Less mandatorily redeemable convertible
preferred stock dividends and accretion (3,937) (3,047) (7,809) (5,591)
Less deemed dividend related to beneficial
conversion feature (46) -- (92) --
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $ (3,724) $ (110,790) $ (18,249) $ (130,914)
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Weighted average common shares outstanding 35,074,936 33,880,327 34,693,186 33,835,392
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Basic and diluted net loss per share $ (0.11) $ (3.27) $ (0.53) $ (3.87)
=========== =========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
4
Z-TEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
(UNAUDITED)
NOTES
COMMON STOCK RECEIVABLE UNEARNED ADDITIONAL TOTAL
--------------------- FROM STOCK PAID-IN ACCUMULATED TREASURY STOCKHOLDERS'
SHARES PAR VALUE STOCKHOLDERS COMPENSATION CAPITAL DEFICIT STOCK DEFICIT
---------- --------- ------------ ------------ ---------- ----------- -------- -------------
Balance, December 31, 2001 34,000,305 $ 343 $ (1,589) $ (122) $ 217,782 $(283,198) $ (388) $ (67,172)
Issuance of common stock 1,000,000 10 2,320 2,330
Issuance of common stock for
exercise of warrants 171,429 2 2
Vesting of stock options
granted below intrinsic
value 67 67
Accelerated vesting of stock
options and issuance of
shares 20,000 -- 84 84
Mandatorily redeemable
convertible preferred
stock dividends and
accretion (7,809) (7,809)
Net loss (10,348) (10,348)
---------- --------- -------- -------- --------- --------- ------- ----------
Balance, June 30, 2002 35,191,734 $ 355 $ (1,589) $ (55) $ 212,377 $(293,546) $ (388) $ (82,846)
========== ========= ======== ======== ========= ========= ======= ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements
5
Z-TEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
(UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30,
----------------------
2002 2001
--------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss $ (10,348) $(125,323)
--------- ---------
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 11,582 12,524
Provision for bad debts 11,479 42,934
Asset Impairment Charge 1,129 59,194
Expense charged for granting of stock options 151 116
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Increase in accounts receivable (13,437) (9,582)
Increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets (138) (4,109)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities (2,760) 1,519
Increase in deferred revenue 7,246 66
Other (122) (52)
--------- ---------
Total adjustments 15,130 102,610
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 4,782 (22,713)
--------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from note receivable -- 7
Issuance of note receivable -- (100)
Purchases of property and equipment (11,769) (9,261)
--------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities (11,769) (9,354)
--------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from exercise of stock options -- 184
Proceeds from exercise of common stock warrants 1 --
Payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations (2,793) (5,057)
--------- ---------
Net cash used in financing activities (2,792) (4,873)
--------- ---------
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (9,779) (36,940)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 18,892 46,650
--------- ---------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 9,113 $ 9,710
========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
6
Z-TEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(ALL TABLES ARE IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)
1. NATURE OF BUSINESS
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Z-Tel Technologies, Inc. ("we" or "us") provides advanced,
integrated telecommunications services targeted to residences and small
businesses. We provide our services at the retail and wholesale levels. At the
retail level, we offer local and long distance telephone services in combination
with enhanced communication features accessible through the telephone, the
Internet and certain personal digital assistants. We offer Z-LineHOME(TM) and
Z-LineBUSINESS(TM) service in thirty-eight states. We also provide long-distance
telecommunications services to customers nationally.
We introduced our wholesale services during the first quarter of 2002. This
service provides other companies with the opportunity to provide local,
long-distance and enhanced telephone service to residential and small business
customers by utilizing our telephone exchange services, infrastructure and
back-office operations.
2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been
prepared by us in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America for interim financial information and are in the
form prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission in instructions to
Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all
of the information and footnotes for complete financial statements as required
by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The
interim unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with our
audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2001,
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.
Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending
December 31, 2002.
RECLASSIFICATION
Certain amounts in consolidated statements of operations for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2001 have been reclassified to conform to presentation
for periods ended June 30, 2002.
SEGMENT REPORTING
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. ("SFAS") 131, Disclosures
about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, requires disclosures of
certain information regarding operating segments, products and services,
geographic areas of operation and major customers. The method for determining
what information to report under SFAS 131 is based upon the "management
approach," or the way that management organizes the operating segments within a
company, for which separate financial information is available that is evaluated
regularly by the Chief Operating Decision Maker in deciding how to allocate
resources and in assessing performance. We adopted segment reporting during the
second quarter of 2002 as a result of our wholesale services contract with MCI
WorldCom Communications, Inc. ("MCI") and the decision by our management to
analyze our wholesale services and consumer services separately. In determining
reportable segments, we considered our operating and management structure and
the types of information subject to regular review by our executive management
team. Information subject to regular review by our management team is aggregated
into two reporting segments: consumer and wholesale services. These segments are
evaluated based on revenue from customers and operating profit contribution to
the total corporation. For the purpose of making operating decisions, we
primarily consider financial information presented on a consolidated basis
accompanied by disaggregated information about revenues and direct expenses.
There is no allocation of overhead or
7
Z-TEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)--(CONTINUED)
(ALL TABLES ARE IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)
expenses other than the direct identifiable expenses associated within each
segment. Any costs not specifically identified are reported in our consumer
services segment.
Our consumer services segment includes the revenue from our Z-LineHOME,
Z-LineBUSINESS and Touch 1 long-distance offerings while our wholesale services
segment currently is the revenue and identifiable direct costs from providing
companies, primarily MCI, with the ability to offer telephone exchange and
enhanced services to residential and small business customers.
3. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AGREEMENT
In July 2000, we entered into an accounts receivable agreement with RFC
Capital Corporation, a division of Textron, Inc. ("RFC"), providing for the sale
of certain of our accounts receivable to RFC. RFC has agreed to purchase up to
$25.0 million of our accounts receivable. This agreement was extended under
substantially similar terms in July 2002. The current agreement
expires in July 2004. The purchase of the receivables is at the option of RFC
and they utilize selection criteria to determine which receivables will be
purchased. During the first six months of 2002, we sold receivables to RFC at a
32% and 23% discount; this rate is negotiable and may change according to
collection experience. The collection percentage for receivables sold to RFC has
been 90% since the inception of the agreement. We received an additional payment
from RFC for servicing the assets in an amount equal to every dollar collected
over the advance rate, less certain fees. The accounts receivable agreement does
not have a minimum receivable sales requirement.
We have sold approximately $74.5 and $80.1 million of receivables to RFC,
for net proceeds of approximately $58.1 and $57.7 million, during the six
months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. A net receivable servicing
asset of approximately $12.0 million is included in the accounts receivable
balance at June 30, 2002. We recorded costs related to the agreement of
approximately $0.4 and $0.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2002, respectively. Included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities are
advances for unbilled receivables in the amount of $4.8 million at June 30,
2002. We are responsible for the continued servicing of the receivables sold.
4. WHOLESALE SERVICES
On March 20, 2002, we entered into a 48-month agreement with MCI for
wholesale telephone exchange services, ancillary services and a limited-term
technology license. The agreement is cancelable by either party after eighteen
months.
Under the terms of the agreement, MCI will pay us a maximum of $50 million
related to the use of our network in the form of a technology license fee,
should the agreement not be terminated early. Cash flows related to the license
will be paid based on the number of MCI customers on our network, as defined in
the contract, and are subject to monthly minimum amounts. In addition, MCI will
pay for services provided through usage-based fees according to certain per line
and per minute calculations defined in the agreement and MCI will also pay fees
to us for providing telephone exchange services, payroll costs and certain
vendor fees. We are the primary obligor for all costs incurred under this
agreement.
We are recognizing the $50 million license fee, and amounts received in
advance of the contract, on a straight-line basis over the four-year contract
period beginning in April 2002. In connection with the agreement, we issued MCI
one million shares of our common stock at a price of $2.33, the market price of
our stock at the date of the agreement. As a result of this transaction an asset
totaling $2.3 million is being amortized on a straight-line basis as a reduction
to revenue over the 48-month term of the agreement with the remaining balance
recorded in other non-current assets. Monthly usage-based charges and cost
reimbursements will be recognized when earned.
8
Z-TEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)--(CONTINUED)
(ALL TABLES ARE IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)
As of June 30, 2002, we have recorded approximately $6.9 in revenue under
the contract with MCI. Included in our consolidated balance sheet as of June 30,
2002, is approximately $3.4 and $3.8 of long-term and short-term deferred
revenue, respectively. These amounts represent advance billings under the
contract. We expensed the costs related to our wholesale business as incurred,
with the exception of certain internal-use software development costs that
qualified for capitalization. We incurred approximately $1.0 million of start-up
costs for our wholesale services, which are shown as wholesale development costs
in the Statement of Operations, and capitalized approximately $2.0 million in
software development costs relating directly to our wholesale services efforts.
5. RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
In April of 2002, we approved and implemented a restructuring to enhance
our future cash flows and operating earnings. The restructuring included a
reduction of force coupled with the closure of our North Dakota call centers and
our New York sales office. In accordance with EITF 94-3, "Liability Recognition
for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity,"
the restructuring costs were recognized as liabilities at the time management
committed us to the plan. Management determined that these costs provided no
future economic benefit to us.
The restructuring charge includes termination benefits and lease
abandonment costs. All termination benefits were paid, with the exception of one
employee, as of June 30, 2002. In addition, we agreed to a settlement to exit
the two leases for our call centers in North Dakota as of July 1, 2002. We have
recorded a lease abandonment charge representing the future lease payments for
our New York office as a liability and will make payments through August 2005.
The following table shows the restructuring charges and related accruals
recognized under the plan and the effect on our consolidated financial position:
EMPLOYEE LEASE LEASE
TERMINATION SETTLEMENT ABANDONMENT
BENEFITS COSTS COSTS TOTAL
----------- ---------- ----------- -------
Balance at January 1, 2002 $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
Plan Charges 913 325 623 1,861
Cash paid (898) -- -- (898)
------- ------- ------- -------
Balance at June 30, 2002 $ 15 $ 325 $ 623 $ 963
======= ======= ======= =======
6. ASSET IMPAIRMENT
In accordance with SFAS No 144, "Accounting for the Impairment and Disposal
of Long-Lived Assets," management assesses on an ongoing basis if there has
been impairment in the carrying value of our long-lived assets. As a result of
management's decision in the second quarter to enhance future cash flow and
operating earnings, we decided to close the remaining call centers in North
Dakota acquired in our acquisition of Touch 1 Communications, Inc. ("Touch 1").
In April of 2002, we announced a restructuring plan that included a reduction in
force and the closure of the North Dakota call centers resulting in
approximately $1.1 million in property, plant, and equipment being sold in
conjunction with the settlement of the leases in these locations.
7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We have disputed billings and access charges to and from certain
inter-exchange carriers (IXCs) and incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs). We
contend that the invoicing and billings of access charges are not in accordance
with the interconnection, service level, or tariff agreements entered between
us and certain
9
Z-TEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)--(CONTINUED)
(ALL TABLES ARE IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)
IXCs and ILECs. We have not paid a portion of these disputed amounts and
management believes that we will prevail in these disputes. At June 30, 2002,
the disputed amounts not recorded in the financial statements were approximately
$6.3 million.
For MCI customers provisioned using our company code we are the
customer of record for the regional bell operating companies wholesale billing.
It is very likely that the state commissions would require us to continue
providing services to MCI's customers for at least the 90 day period contained
in the guidelines described below, regardless of whether MCI continues its
relationship with these customers.
Under the New York Public Service Commission's ("Commission") mass
migration guidelines, when a local exchange carrier discontinues service its
customers must have the ability to migrate to another carrier without
interruption of service. Carriers are required to file an exit plan with the
Commission at least 90 days in advance of discontinuance of service, or must
demonstrate that 90 days' notice was not feasible. Customers must be notified
not less than 60 days prior to discontinuance of service, and a second notice
must be provided if the customer has not taken action to change to a new
provider. Other states in which we and MCI operate are developing similar rules
for carriers exiting markets, generally using the Commission's guidelines as a
framework.
8. COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to
common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
during the period. Incremental shares of common stock equivalents are not
included in the calculation of net loss per share as the inclusion of such
equivalents would be anti-dilutive.
Net loss per share is calculated as follows:
THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
-------------------------- --------------------------
2002 2001 2002 2001
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE:
Net income (loss) $ 259 $ (107,743) $ (10,348) $ (125,323)
Less mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred
stock dividends and accretion (3,937) (3,047) (7,809) (5,591)
Less deemed dividend related to beneficial conversion feature (46) -- (92) --
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $ (3,724) $ (110,790) $ (18,249) $ (130,914)
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Weighted average common shares outstanding 35,074,936 33,880,327 34,693,186 33,835,392
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Basic and diluted net loss per share $ (0.11) $ (3.27) $ (0.53) $ (3.87)
=========== =========== =========== ===========
The following table outlines the shares of common stock equivalents that
could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future but were not
included in the computation of diluted net loss per share:
10
Z-TEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)--(CONTINUED)
(ALL TABLES ARE IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)
SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30,
-----------------------
2002 2001
---------- ---------
Unexercised stock options 10,470,921 7,805,470
Unexercised warrants 8,328,907 5,274,023
Mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred
stock convertible into common shares 27,263,558 3,521,999
---------- ---------
Total potentially dilutive shares of common
stock equivalents 46,063,386 16,601,492
========== ==========
9. LEGAL AND REGULATORY PROCEEDINGS
During June and July 2001, three separate class action lawsuits were filed
against us, certain of our current and former directors and officers (the
"D&Os") and firms engaged in the underwriting (the "Underwriters") of our
initial public offering of stock (the "IPO"). The lawsuits, along with
approximately 310 other similar lawsuits filed against other issuers arising out
of initial public offering allocations, have been assigned to a Judge in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for pretrial
coordination. The lawsuits against us have been consolidated into a single
action. A consolidated amended complaint was filed on April 20, 2002. A Second
Corrected Amended Complaint (the "Amended Complaint"), which is the operative
complaint, was filed on July 12, 2002.
The Amended Complaint is based on the allegations that our registration
statement on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC")
in connection with the IPO, contained untrue statements of material fact and
omitted to state facts necessary to make the statements made not misleading by
failing to disclose that the underwriters had received additional, excessive and
undisclosed commissions from, and had entered into unlawful tie-in and other
arrangements with, certain customers to whom they allocated shares in the IPO.
The plaintiffs in the Amended Complaint assert claims against us and the D&Os
pursuant to Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated by the SEC
thereunder. The plaintiffs in the Amended Complaint assert claims against the
D&Os pursuant to Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections
10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
promulgated by the SEC thereunder. The plaintiffs seek an undisclosed amount of
damages, as well as pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, costs and expenses,
including attorneys' fees, experts' fees and other costs and disbursements. On
July 15, 2002, we and the individual defendants moved to dismiss all claims. The
Court has not ruled on this motion. Discovery is stayed pending the outcome of
the motion to dismiss. We intend to vigorously defend against this lawsuit.
Furthermore, we believe we are entitled to indemnification from our
Underwriters.
Our common stock is currently traded on the Nasdaq National Market. For
continued listing on the National Market, Nasdaq requires, among other things,
that listed securities maintain a minimum bid price of not less than $3.00 per
share. By letter dated February 14, 2002, Nasdaq advised us that we are not in
compliance with the National Market's continuing listing standards because our
stock price had closed below $3 per share for 30 consecutive trading days. The
letter gave us 90 days, or until May 15, 2002, to regain compliance or our
securities would be delisted from the Nasdaq National Market. By letter dated
May 23, 2002, Nasdaq informed us that we had not regained compliance and that
our securities would be delisted from the Nasdaq National Market at the opening
of business May 31, 2002. On May 29, 2002, we filed an application with Nasdaq
to transfer our securities to the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. That filing stayed the
delisting process pending the approval or disapproval of the application. Nasdaq
allows National Market issuers to downlist from the National Market to the
SmallCap Market provided they meet the SmallCap Market's continuing listing
standards, which include a minimum bid price of not
11
Z-TEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)--(CONTINUED)
(ALL TABLES ARE IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)
less than $1.00 per share and a market value of listed securities of at least
$35 million. By letter dated June 28, 2002, Nasdaq disapproved our application
for transfer to the SmallCap Market based upon our failure to meet the $35
million market capitalization of listed securities requirement. We promptly
requested a hearing before the Nasdaq Hearing Panel. Since that time the market
value of our listed securities has reached and exceeded $35 million so that we
meet the Nasdaq SmallCap Market's continuing listing standards. At the hearing
held August 8, 2002 we requested a delay in delisting to reassess our compliance
with the SmallCap listing requirements. A decision from the Nasdaq Hearing Panel
is pending. If not listed on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, our common stock may be
eligible for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board or other over-the-counter
markets, although there can be no assurance that our common stock will be
eligible for trading on any alternative exchanges or markets. Among other
consequences, moving from the Nasdaq National Market to the Nasdaq SmallCap
Market, or trading on the OTC Bulletin Board, may cause reduced liquidity in the
trading market for our common stock and difficulty for us in obtaining future
financing.
On February 27, 2002, the New York Public Service Commission (the
"Commission") approved a settlement, which reduced the prices that we and other
competitive local exchange carriers pay for unbundled network elements and
expanded the availability of those elements. Specifically, rates for the
elements comprising the unbundled network element platform were reduced by
approximately $8 to $9 per month per subscriber, on average. These rate
decreases took effect on March 1, 2002. In addition, the Commission directed
Verizon to provide bill credits to us in the amount of approximately $9.0
million to implement retroactive rate decreases for unbundled local switching.
We have recorded the full impact of this credit as a reduction to our network
operations expense. We have received fifty percent of this credit as of June 30,
2002, and the remaining 50% will be spread over a six-month period that began in
July 2002.
In the ordinary course of business, we are involved in legal proceedings
that are generally incidental to our operations. In addition, from time to time,
we are the subject of customer complaints filed with the state utility
commissions of the states in which it operates or the Federal Communications
Commission. Most complaints are handled informally and at this time there are no
formal proceedings pending. While there can be no assurance of the ultimate
disposition of incidental legal proceedings or customer complaints, we do not
believe their disposition will have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated results of operations or financial position.
10. SEGMENT REPORTING
We have two reportable operating segments: Consumer Services and Wholesale
Services.
The consumer services segment includes our Z-LineHOME and Z-LineBUSINESS
services that offer bundled local and long-distance telephone services in
combination with enhanced communication features accessible through the
telephone, the Internet and certain personal digital assistants. We offer this
service in 38 states to residential customers. We actively market Z-LineHOME in
ten states and Z-LineBUSINESS in six states. This segment also includes our
Touch 1 residential long-distance offering that is available nation-wide.
The wholesale services segment allows companies to offer telephone
exchange and enhanced services to residential and small business customers.
This service is currently available in 38 states and MCI is our primary customer
for this offering.
This is the first period that we have reported more than one reportable
segment.
12
Z-TELTECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)--(CONTINUED)
(ALL TABLES ARE IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)
The following summarizes the financial information concerning our
reportable segments for the six months ended June 30, 2002:
NET DEPRECIATION
INCOME AND CAPITAL IDENTIFIABLE
REVENUES (LOSS) AMORTIZATION EXPENDITURES ASSETS
--------- --------- ------------ ------------ ------------
Segments:
Consumer Services 113,271 (16,086) 11,245 3,950 100,076
Wholesale Services 6,879 925 337 7,819 10,489
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total Segment 120,150 (15,161) 11,582 11,769 110,565
======= ======= ====== ====== =======
Reconciling Items:
Non-recurring items:
Asset impairment charge (1,129)
Restructuring charge (1,861)
Retroactive reduction to
New York access rates 8,981
WorldCom Bankruptcy (657) (647)
------- -------
Total non-recurring items: (657) 5,344
------- -------
Corporate items
(Not assigned to a segment):
Nonoperating income
(expense) (531)
Mandatorily redeemable
convertible preferred
stock dividends and
accretion (7,809)
Deemed dividend related
to beneficial conversion
feature (92)
------- -------
Total corporate items: -- (8,432)
------- -------
Total Consolidated 119,493 (18,249)
======= =======
11. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In July 2002, we extended our agreement with RFC under substantially
similar terms for an additional two years.
In July 2002, we renegotiated an agreement with a service firm that
provides us with new customer provisioning services through electronic bonding
with the incumbent local exchange carriers. "Provisioning" is the process
whereby we are established as the customer's primary local and long distance
telephone provider. Under this agreement, we have committed to minimum cash
payments, subject to certain adjustments, of approximately $7.0, $14.5, and
$15.7 million for the remainder of 2002 and the years ending December 31, 2003
and 2004, respectively. We make payments monthly according to the contract. This
contract provides, under certain circumstances, for early termination and
severance fees for such action.
On July 21, 2002, WorldCom, Inc. ("WorldCom") and certain of its subsidiary
corporations, including MCI, filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter
11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. Under the Bankruptcy Code a vendor that
provides post-petition goods or services to a debtor on a continuous basis is
entitled to payment for those goods and services on a timely basis if the debtor
wants the vendor to continue supplying the goods or services. Neither the
Bankruptcy Code nor the applicable case law requires vendors to provide
post-petition goods and services to a debtor without payment. The Bankruptcy
Code also entitles a debtor to reject "executory" contracts, that is contracts
where some future act remains to be done, as in the case of our contract with
MCI. A party to a rejected contract may be entitled to damages from the debtor
for breach of contract. However, such a claim would likely be an unsecured
claim. WorldCom's bankruptcy case is in its early stages. At this time we have
13
Z-TEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)--(CONTINUED)
(ALL TABLES ARE IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)
no assurance that MCI has the resources to pay its vendors on a timely basis.
Nor do we have any indication that MCI intends to reject our contract.
In August 2002, we made loans to two employees in the approximate amounts
of $0.1 and $0.9 million. These loans were to cover margin balances and prevent
the liquidation of the employees' holdings of our common stock. The loans are
currently demand loans bearing interest at an annual rate equal to the prime
rate plus 2%. We anticipate establishing terms whereby the employees will begin
repayment of the principal balances.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS.
You should read the following discussion together with the condensed
consolidated financial statements and related notes and other sections of this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This discussion contains forward-looking
statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ
materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of
certain factors. Factors that may affect our results of operations include, but
are not limited to, our limited operating history and cumulative losses,
uncertainty of customer demand, rapid expansion, potential software failures and
errors, potential network and interconnection failure, dependence on local
exchange carriers, dependence on third party vendors, dependence on key
personnel, dependence on key wholesale services customers, uncertainty of
government regulation, legal and regulatory uncertainties, and competition. We
disclaim any obligation to update information contained in any forward-looking
statement. In addition to these factors, other factors that could affect our
financial results are described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2002.
OVERVIEW
We provide advanced, integrated telecommunications services targeted to
residential and small business subscribers. We offer local and long distance
telephone services in combination with enhanced communication features
accessible through the telephone or the Internet. The nature of our business is
evolving, and we have a limited operating history.
We began providing our wholesale services during the first quarter of 2002.
This service provides other companies with the opportunity to provide local,
long-distance and enhanced telephone services to residential and small business
customers by utilizing our telephone exchange services, infrastructure and
back-office operations.
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following is a discussion of significant changes in our results of
operations, which occurred in the three and six months ended June 30, 2002
compared to the same periods in the prior year. The following tables summarize
the approximate changes in selected operating items and include dollar changes,
percentage changes and percent of revenues to facilitate our discussions that
follow.
14
FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED AMOUNT PERCENTAGE PERCENTAGE
JUNE 30, CHANGE CHANGE OF REVENUE
------------------- FAVORABLE FAVORABLE -------------------
2002 2001 (UNFAVORABLE) (UNFAVORABLE) 2002 2001
-------- -------- ------------- ------------- -------- --------
Revenues $ 62.2 $ 73.1 $ (10.9) (14.9)% 100.0% 100.0%
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Operating expenses:
Network operations 17.1 41.7 24.6 59.0% 27.5% 57.0%
Sales and marketing 2.3 8.9 6.6 74.2% 3.7% 12.2%
General and administrative 32.4 64.8 32.4 50.0% 52.1% 88.6%
Asset impairment charge 1.1 59.2 58.1 98.1% 1.8% 81.0%
Restructuring charge 1.9 -- (1.9) (100.0)% 3.1% --%
Depreciation and amortization 6.0 6.5 0.5 7.7% 9.6% 8.9%
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total operating expenses 60.8 181.1 120.3 66.4% 97.7% 247.7%
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Operating income (loss) 1.4 (108.0) 109.4 101.3% 2.3% (147.7)%
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Nonoperating income (loss):
Interest and other income 0.3 1.4 (1.1) (78.6)% 0.5% 1.9%
Interest and other expense (1.4) (1.2) (0.2) (16.7)% (2.3)% (1.6)%
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total nonoperating income (loss) (1.1) 0.2 (1.3) (650.0)% (1.8)% 0.3%
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net income (loss) 0.3 (107.8) 108.1 100.3% 0.5% (147.5)%
Less mandatorily redeemable convertible
preferred stock dividends and accretion (3.9) (3.0) (0.9) (30.0)% (6.3)% (4.1)%
Less deemed dividend related to beneficial
conversion feature (0.1) -- (0.1) (100.0)% (0.2)% --%
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $ (3.7) $ (110.8) $ 107.1 96.7% (5.9)% (151.6)%
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
EBITDA $ 7.4 $ (101.5) $ 108.9 107.3% 11.9% (138.9)%
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
15
FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED AMOUNT PERCENTAGE PERCENTAGE
JUNE 30, CHANGE CHANGE OF REVENUE
------------------- FAVORABLE FAVORABLE -------------------
2002 2001 (UNFAVORABLE) (UNFAVORABLE) 2002 2001
-------- -------- ------------- ------------- -------- --------
Revenues $ 119.5 $ 148.2 $ (28.7) (19.4)% 100.0% 100.0%
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Operating expenses:
Network operations 44.3 85.0 40.7 47.9% 37.1% 57.4%
Sales and marketing 7.1 21.6 14.5 67.1% 5.9% 14.6%
General and administrative 62.3 97.4 35.1 36.0% 52.1% 65.7%
Asset impairment charge 1.1 59.2 58.1 98.1% 0.9% 39.9%
Wholesale development costs 1.0 -- (1.0) (100.0)% 0.8% --%
Restructuring charge 1.9 -- (1.9) (100.0)% 1.6% --%
Depreciation and amortization 11.6 12.5 0.9 7.2% 9.7% 8.4%
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total operating expenses 129.3 275.7 146.4 53.1% 108.2% 186.0%
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Operating loss (9.8) (127.5) 117.7 (92.3)% (8.2)% (86.0)%
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Nonoperating income (loss):
Interest and other income 1.5 4.3 (2.8) (65.1)% 1.3% 2.9%
Interest and other expense (2.0) (2.1) 0.1 4.8% (1.7)% (1.4)%
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total nonoperating income (loss) (0.5) 2.2 (2.7) (122.7)% (0.4)% 1.5%
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net loss (10.3) (125.3) 115.0 91.8% (8.6)% (84.5)%
Less mandatorily redeemable convertible
preferred stock dividends and accretion (7.8) (5.6) (2.2) (39.3)% (6.5)% (3.8)%
Less deemed dividend related to beneficial
conversion feature (0.1) -- (0.1) 100.0% (0.1)% --%
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $ (18.2) $ (130.9) $ 112.7 86.1% (15.2)% (88.3)%
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
EBITDA $ 1.8 $ (115.0) $ 116.8 101.6% 1.5% (77.6)%
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
During 2001 and 2002, several events occurred which significantly affected
the comparability of our operating results. Those events include the following:
16
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002
--------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------
NET LOSS NET LOSS
ATTRIBUTABLE ATTRIBUTABLE
NET INCOME TO COMMON NET INCOME TO COMMON
(LOSS) STOCKHOLDERS EBITDA EPS (LOSS) STOCKHOLDERS EBITDA EPS
---------- ------------ ------- ------- ---------- ------------ ------- -------
Reported amounts $ 0.3 $ (3.7) $ 7.4 $ (0.11) $ (10.3) $ (18.2) $ 1.8 $ (0.53)
Non-recurring items:
Retroactive reduction to
network access rates (9.0) (9.0) (9.0) (0.25) (9.0) (9.0) (9.0) (0.25)
Restructuring charge 1.9 1.9 1.9 0.05 1.9 1.9 1.9 0.05
Asset impairment 1.1 1.1 1.1 0.03 1.1 1.1 1.1 0.03
WorldCom bankruptcy 1.3 1.3 1.3 0.04 1.3 1.3 1.3 0.04
Wholesale development
costs -- -- -- -- 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.03
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total impact of non-
recurring items (4.7) (4.7) (4.7) (0.13) (3.7) (3.7) (3.7) (0.10)
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Normalized amounts $ (4.4) $ (8.4) $ 2.7 $ (0.24) $ (14.0) $ (21.9) $ (1.9) $ (0.63)
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2001 SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2001
--------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------
NET LOSS NET LOSS
ATTRIBUTABLE ATTRIBUTABLE
NET INCOME TO COMMON NET INCOME TO COMMON
(LOSS) STOCKHOLDERS EBITDA EPS (LOSS) STOCKHOLDERS EBITDA EPS
---------- ------------ ------- ------- ---------- ------------ ------- -------
Reported amounts $(107.8) $(110.8) $(101.5) $ (3.27) $(125.3) $(130.9) $(115.0) $ (3.87)
Non-recurring items:
Retroactive reduction to
network access rates -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Restructuring charge -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Asset impairment 59.2 59.2 59.2 1.75 59.2 59.2 59.2 1.75
WorldCom bankruptcy -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Wholesale development
costs -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Write-down of accounts
receivable 29.9 29.9 29.9 0.89 29.9 29.9 29.9 0.88
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total impact of non-
recurring items 89.1 89.1 89.1 2.64 89.1 89.1 89.1 2.63
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Normalized amounts $ (18.7) $ (21.7) $ (12.4) $ (0.63) $ (36.2) $ (41.8) $ (25.9) $ (1.24)
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
NET LOSS NET LOSS
ATTRIBUTABLE ATTRIBUTABLE
NET INCOME TO COMMON NET INCOME TO COMMON
(LOSS) STOCKHOLDERS EBITDA EPS (LOSS) STOCKHOLDERS EBITDA EPS
---------- ------------ ------- ------- ---------- ------------ ------- -------
Change in normalized amounts
(2002 vs. 2001) $ 14.3 $ 13.3 $ 15.1 $ 0.39 $ 22.2 $ 19.9 $ 24.0 $ 0.61
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
% change of normalzied
amounts 76% 61% 122% 62% 61% 48% 93% 49%
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
17
Retroactive reduction to network access rates - Represents a one-time
retroactive reduction of rates we pay for unbundled network elements ("UNEs")
in the state of New York.
Restructuring charge - Represents restructuring related costs for actions
taken to reduce operating costs. These costs include severance related costs and
lease termination costs associated with the reduction in force and closing of
our call centers.
Asset impairment - The 2002 costs represent the impairment of assets sold
in conjunction with the closing of our call centers, which is related to the
restructuring plan noted above. The 2001 amounts include the impairment of
goodwill and other minor assets associated with our April 2000 purchase of Touch
1 Communications, Inc.
WorldCom bankruptcy - We recorded additional allowance amounts and ceased
recording revenue related to carrier access billings to WorldCom. These charges
relate solely to our exposure in the consumer services segment, not our
wholesale agreement with MCI.
Wholesale development costs - During the first quarter of 2002, we incurred
certain costs related to initiating our wholesale services offerings.
Write-down of accounts receivable - In 2001, we recorded a charge to
write-down accounts receivable associated with approximately 90,000 of our
subscribers.
OPERATING RESULTS
Revenues. Revenues decreased by $10.9 million to $62.2 million for the
quarter ended June 30, 2002, compared to $73.1 million for the same period in
the prior year. The decrease is attributable to a decrease in customers in the
consumer services segment, offset by revenue generated by the new wholesale
services segment.
Revenues decreased by $28.7 million to $119.5 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2002, compared to $148.2 million for the same period in the prior
year. The decrease is attributable to a decrease in customers in the consumer
services segment, offset by revenue generated by the new wholesale services
segment.
Network Operations. Network operations expense decreased by $24.6 million
to $17.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, compared to $41.7 million
for the same period in the prior year. Included in this decrease is a
retroactive rate reduction for UNEs in New York related to our consumer services
segment.
Network operations expense decreased by $40.7 million to $44.3 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2002, compared to $85.0 million for the same
period in the prior year. Included in this decrease is the non-recurring
retroactive rate reduction for UNEs related to our consumer services segment.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expense decreased $6.6 million to
$2.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, compared to $8.9 million for
the same period in the prior year.
Sales and marketing expense decreased $14.5 million to $7.1 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2002, compared to $21.6 million for the same period in
the prior year.
Our continued focus on conserving cash and improving the quality of our
subscribers resulted in reduced sales and marketing expense. The restructuring
of our consumer services segment in April 2002 also reduced sales and marketing
expense. We also decreased spending on radio, billboard, and television
advertising during 2002.
Although the closure of our North Dakota call centers in April 2002 will
reduce our sales and marketing expense for the remainder of 2002, we are likely
to reinvest this savings into our Z-LineHOME, Z-LineBUSINESS and wholesale
services offerings. We will invest in television, print, and radio advertising
during the second half of 2002 in an attempt to moderately increase our
Z-LineHOME subscriber base. We have hired sales representatives in six major
cities to market our Z-LineBUSINESS services. We have established a business
development group to market all of our service offerings to potential
affiliate marketing groups and build our wholesale services
18
business. Sales and marketing expense should be slightly higher during the
second half of 2002 compared to the first half of the year.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expense decreased
$32.4 million to $32.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, compared to
$64.8 million for the same period in the prior year. Excluding a non-recurring
write-off of $29.9 million of accounts receivable in the consumer services
segment during the second quarter of 2001, general and administrative expense
decreased $2.5 million to $32.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2002,
compared to $34.9 million for the same period in the prior year.
General and administrative expense decreased $35.1 million to $62.3 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2002, compared to $97.4 million for the same
period in the prior year. Excluding the non-recurring accounts receivable
write-off, general and administrative expense decreased $5.2 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2002 compared to $67.5 million for the same period in the
prior year.
The decrease in general and administrative expense for the three and six
months is split equally between the reduction in headcount and cost control
measures we have implemented and the decreased incremental cost of maintaining
our reduced consumer services customer base in 2002. Although general and
administrative costs decreased in total dollars, as a percentage of total
revenue general and administrative expense was 52.1% for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2002, compared to 47.7% and 45.5% for the same period in
the prior year, excluding the non-recurring $29.9 million accounts receivable
write-off in 2001. We anticipate that the growth of our wholesale services and
the focus on improved subscriber economics for our residential and small
business services, combined with an increased utilization of fixed costs within
our business will drive down general and administrative expenses as a percentage
of revenues during the remainder of 2002.
Asset impairment charge. Asset impairment charges decreased $58.1 million
to $1.1 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2002, compared to
$59.2 million for the same periods in the prior year. The charges in the current
year are due to the closure of consumer services call centers.
Wholesale development costs. Wholesale development costs increased $1.0
million to $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002, compared to $0.0
million for the same period in the prior year. We incurred these costs, related
to the initiation of our wholesale services offerings, during the first quarter
of 2002.
Restructuring charge. Restructuring charges related to the consumer
services segment increased $1.9 million to $1.9 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2002, compared to $0.0 million for the same period in the prior year.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense
decreased $0.5 million to $6.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2002,
compared to $6.5 million for the same period in the prior year.
Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $0.9 million to $11.6
million for the six months ended June 30, 2002, compared to $12.5 million for
the same period in the prior year.
The decrease in depreciation and amortization is primarily a result of the
write-off of $59.2 million of goodwill in the second quarter of 2001 in the
consumer services segment.
Interest and Other Income. Interest and other income decreased $1.1 million
to $0.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, compared to $1.4 million
for the same period in the prior year.
Interest and other income decreased $2.8 million to $1.5 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2002, compared to $4.3 million for the same period in
the prior year.
Other income is primarily comprised of late fees charged to our
subscribers. The decrease for three and six months ended June 30, 2002 was
primarily due to an overall decrease in subscribers compared to the same period
in 2001, resulting in smaller late payment fees being assessed to subscribers.
19
Interest and Other Expense. Interest and other expense increased $0.2
million to $1.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, compared to $1.2
million for the same period in the prior year.
Interest and other expense increased $0.1 million to $2.0 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2002, compared to $2.1 million for the same period in
the prior year.
The small increase in interest expense relates to the payment of late
payment fees for extending payments with certain vendors beyond their standard
payment terms. We anticipate interest expense to stay relatively flat in the
future unless we are able to obtain additional or new funding sources and to the
extent we are able to finance our capital expenditures necessary to grow our
business for the remainder of 2002.
Income Tax Expense. No provision for federal or state income taxes has been
recorded due to the full valuation allowance recorded against the deferred tax
asset for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001.
Net Loss. Net loss improved by $108.1 million to net income of $0.3 million
for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, compared to a loss of $107.8 million for
the same period in the prior year.
Net loss decreased by $115.0 million to $10.3 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2002, compared to a loss of $125.3 million for the same period in
the prior year.
Excluding significant non-recurring items for the periods presented, as
outlined in the table at the beginning of this section, net loss improved by
$14.3 million to a net loss of $4.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2002,
compared to a loss of $18.7 million for the same period in the prior year. Net
loss improved by $22.2 million to a net loss of $14.0 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2002, compared to a loss of $36.2 million for the same period in
the prior year.
The improvement to net loss was primarily a result of decreased expenses,
as discussed above.
Net Loss Attributable to Common Stockholders. Our net loss attributable to
common stockholders decreased $107.1 million to $3.7 million for the quarter
ended June 30, 2002, compared to $110.8 million for the same period in the prior
year.
Net loss attributable to common stockholders decreased $112.7 million to
$18.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002, compared to $130.9 million
for the same period in the prior year.
Excluding significant non-recurring items for the periods presented, as
outlined in the table at the beginning of this section, net loss attributable to
common stockholders improved by $13.3 million to a net loss of $8.4 million for
the quarter ended June 30, 2002, compared to a loss of $21.7 million for the
same period in the prior year. Net loss attributable to common stockholders
improved by $19.9 million to a net loss of $21.9 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2002, compared to a loss of $41.8 million for the same period in
the prior year.
EBITDA. Many securities analysts use the measure of earnings before
deducting interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, also commonly
referred to as "EBITDA," as a way of evaluating financial performance.
EBITDA is not a measure under accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America ("GAAP"), is not meant to be a replacement for GAAP and
should not be considered an alternative to net income as a measure of
performance or to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. We have included EBITDA
data because it is a measure commonly used in the telecommunications industry
and is presented to assist in understanding our operating results.
Our EBITDA improved by $108.9 million to positive EBITDA of $7.4 million
for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, compared to negative EBITDA of $101.5
million for the same period in the prior year.
Our EBITDA improved by $116.8 million to positive EBITDA of $1.8 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2002, compared to negative EBITDA of $115.0
million for the same period in the prior year.
20
Excluding significant non-recurring items for the periods presented, as
outlined in the table at the beginning of this section, EBITDA improved by $15.1
million to a positive EBITDA of $2.7 million for the quarter ended June 30,
2002, compared to negative EBITDA of $12.4 million for the same period in the
prior year. EBITDA improved by $24.0 million to negative EBITDA of $1.9 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2002, compared to a negative EBITDA of $25.9
million for the same period in the prior year.
We expect to continue our improvement to EBITDA compared to prior year
periods. Although we anticipate future positive EBITDA we have to manage several
risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, how the bankruptcy of MCI
is resolved, our ability to increase our residential and subscriber bases
through sales and marketing channels and the ability to further develop our
wholesale services. We anticipate the contribution of additional revenue streams
from our small business, residential and wholesale services coupled with the
reduction in costs we have undertaken in the last year to result in the
achievement of positive EBITDA during the remainder of 2002.
RESULTS BY SEGMENT
CONSUMER SERVICES
Revenues. The decrease is attributable to a decrease in Z-LineHOME and
Touch 1 long-distance customers for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, compared to
the same period in the prior year. Touch 1 contributed $4.6 million of revenue
for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 compared to $5.9 million for the same period
last year.
The decrease is attributable to a decrease in Z-LineHOME and Touch 1
long-distance customers for the six months ended June 30, 2002, compared the
same period in the prior year. Touch 1 contributed $8.8 million of revenue for
the six months ended June 30, 2002 compared to $12.6 million for the same period
last year.
The reduction in lines was a result of our focus on eliminating poor paying
customers and increasing the stringency of customer acceptance. We also reduced
our sales and marketing efforts for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002
compared to the same periods in the prior year.
We expect Z-LineHOME to continue to increase as a percentage of revenue
relative to our Touch 1 (1+) Long Distance Services but decrease as a percentage
of total revenue as we expect growth in our wholesale services segment. We also
expect our Z-LineBUSINESS services to begin to contribute to future revenues.
Network Operations. Network operations expense decreased by $26.2 million
to $15.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002, compared to $41.7
million for the same period in the prior year. Included in this decrease is a
$9.0 million retroactive rate reduction for UNEs in New York. We have received
$4.5 million through bill credits as of June 30, 2002 and will receive the
remaining amount ratably over the remainder of 2002. Our consumer services gross
margin percentage increased to 55.8% for the quarter ended June 30, 2002,
excluding the $9.0 million non-recurring retroactive rate reduction, compared to
43.0% for the same period in the prior year.
Network operations expense decreased by $24.3 million to $60.7 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2002, compared to $85.0 million for the same
period in the prior year. Included in this decrease is the $9.0 million
non-recurring retroactive rate reduction. Our consumer services gross margin
percentage increased to 54.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2002, excluding
the $9.0 million non-recurring retroactive rate reduction, compared to 42.6% for
the same period in the prior year.
The overall decrease in network operations expense is a result of fewer
subscribers for both our Z-LineHOME and Touch 1 long-distance service
offerings. The increases in gross margin is attributable to the New York Public
Service Commission imposed rate reduction to the UNE pricing, which became
effective March 1, 2002. This reduction to UNE rates in New York, the state in
which we have our largest concentration of customers, lowered our overall cost
to provide services to customers in New York. This reduction resulted in an
increased gross margin percentage during the three and six months ended June 30,
2002.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expense decreased by
$35.4 million to $29.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002,
compared to $64.8 million for the same period in the prior year.
21
Excluding a non-recurring write-off of $29.9 million of accounts receivable,
general and administrative expense decreased $5.5 million on a normalized
comparison.
General and administrative expense decreased by $38.1 million to $59.3
million for the six months ended June 30, 2002, compared to $97.4 million for
the same period in the prior year. Excluding a non-recurring write-off of $29.9
million of accounts receivable, general and administrative expense decreased
$8.2 million on a normalized comparison.
The decrease in general and administrative expense for the three and six
months is discussed in the consolidated discussions.
Asset impairment charge. In accordance with SFAS No 144, "Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," management assesses on an
ongoing basis whether there has been impairment in the carrying value of its
long-lived assets. As a result of management's decision in the second quarter of
2002 to enhance future cash flow and operating earnings we decided to close the
remaining call centers in North Dakota acquired from Touch 1 Communications,
Inc. ("Touch 1"). In April of 2002 we announced a restructuring plan that
included a reduction in force and the closure of the North Dakota call centers
resulting in approximately $1.1 million in property, plant, and equipment being
sold in conjunction with the settlement of the leases in these locations.
In the second quarter of 2001 we sold certain telemarketing centers in
North Dakota. We recorded an impairment charge of $59.2 million for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2001. This impairment was composed of a $54.9
million charge to our intangible assets for the change in the carrying value of
the intangibles after the sale of our call centers, $3.0 million relating to
unrealizable software and development projects, $0.9 million of worthless
telemarketing property and equipment and $0.4 million of securities deemed to be
worthless for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001.
Restructuring charge. Restructuring charges increased $1.9 million to $1.9
million for the six months ended June 30, 2002, compared to $0.0 million for the
same period in the prior year.
In April of 2002, we approved and implemented a restructuring to enhance
our future cash flows and operating earnings. The restructuring included a
reduction of force coupled with the closure of our North Dakota call centers and
our New York sales office. In accordance with EITF 94-3, "Liability Recognition
for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity,"
the restructuring costs were recognized as liabilities at the time management
committed us to the plan. Management determined that these costs provided no
future economic benefit to us.
The restructuring charges include termination benefits and lease
abandonment costs. All termination benefits were paid with the exception of one
employee as of June 30, 2002. In addition, we agreed to a settlement to exit the
two leases for our call centers in North Dakota as of July 1, 2002. We have
recorded a lease abandonment charge representing the future lease payments for
our New York office as a liability and will make payments through August 2005.
Depreciation and Amortization. The decrease in depreciation and
amortization is primarily a result of our sale of equipment as a result of
closing our North Dakota call centers in the second quarter of 2001. In
addition, the write-off of $54.9 million of goodwill in the second quarter of
2001 led to decreased amortization during the first two quarters of 2002. We
anticipate additional purchases of computer equipment, switching equipment,
furniture and leasehold improvements in connection with our wholesale service
offering; however, depreciation and amortization expense should stay relatively
constant over the remainder of 2002.
WHOLESALE SERVICES
Revenues. Our wholesale services contributed $6.9 million or 11% and 5.8%
of total revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively.
The second quarter of 2002 was the first time we generated wholesale services
revenue.
22
Network Operations. Network operations expense was $1.6 million for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2002.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expense was $3.0
million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002. This expense is
comprised of the expense to provision, bill, and support the wholesale services.
We expect general and administrative expenses to vary depending on our ability
to attract new wholesale customers.
Wholesale development costs. Wholesale development costs increased $1.0
million to $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002, compared to $0.0
million for the same period in the prior year.
We expensed the costs related to our wholesale business as incurred, with
the exception of certain internal-use software development costs that qualified
for capitalization. We have incurred approximately $1.0 million of start-up
costs for launch of our wholesale services.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The competitive local telecommunications service business is traditionally
considered to be a capital intensive business owing to the significant
investments required in fiber optic communication networks and the collocation
of switching and transmission equipment in incumbent local exchange carriers'
central offices. Although we will continue with our capital expenditures, we do
not expect that the growth of our business will require the levels of capital
investment in fiber optics and switches that existed in historical
telecommunications facilities-based models. Instead, we will devote significant
amounts of our capital resources to continued operations, software development
and marketing efforts that we have designed to achieve rapid penetration of our
target markets.
We have incurred accumulated losses since our inception as a result of
developing our business, research and development, building and maintaining
network infrastructure and technology, sales and promotion of our services, and
administrative expenditures. As of June 30, 2002, we had an accumulated deficit
of $293.5 million and $9.1 million in cash and cash equivalents. We have funded
our expenditures primarily through operating revenues, private securities
offerings, a sale-leaseback credit facility, sales of accounts receivable and an
initial public offering. We intend to continue building our organization in
anticipation of future growth and believe that our operating expenditures will
also continue to increase.
In January 2002, we accelerated the vesting of 96,471 stock options granted
to an executive as part of his severance agreement. This acceleration resulted
in the employee being fully vested in stock options with a strike price of $1.30
when the stock was trading at $1.80. The employee forfeited 76,471 of his vested
options in return for the exercise of 20,000 shares of stock. We recorded
approximately $0.1 million in general and administrative expense as a result of
this transaction.
On February 27, 2002, the New York Public Service Commission (the
"Commission") approved a settlement, which reduced the prices that we and other
competitive local exchange carriers pay for unbundled network elements and
expanded the availability of those elements. Specifically, rates for the
elements comprising the unbundled network element platform were reduced by
approximately $8 to $9 per month per subscriber, on average. These rate
decreases took effect on March 1, 2002. In addition, the Commission directed
Verizon to provide bill credits to us in the amount of approximately $9.0
million to implement retroactive rate decreases for unbundled local switching.
We have recorded the full impact of this credit as a reduction to our network
operations expense. We have received fifty percent of this credit as of June 30,
2002, and the remaining 50% will be spread over a six-month period that began in
July 2002.
On March 20, 2002, we entered into a 48-month agreement with MCI WORLDCOM
Communications, Inc. (MCI) for providing wholesale telephone exchange services,
ancillary services and a limited-term software license. The agreement is
cancelable by either party after 18 months.
Under the terms of the agreement, MCI will pay us a maximum of $50 million
related to the use of our network in the form of a technology license fee,
should the agreement not be terminated early. Cash flows related
23
to the license will be paid based on the number of MCI customers on our network,
as defined in the contract, and are subject to monthly minimum amounts. In
addition, MCI will pay for services provided through usage-based fees according
to certain per line and per minute calculations defined in the agreement and MCI
will also pay fees to us for providing telephone exchange services, payroll
costs and certain vendor fees. We are the primary obligor for all costs incurred
under this agreement.
We are recognizing the $50 million license fee, and amounts received in
advance of the contract, on a straight-line basis over the four-year contract
period beginning in April 2002. In connection with the agreement, we issued MCI
one million shares of our common stock at a price of $2.33, the market price of
our stock at the date of the agreement. As a result of this transaction an asset
totaling $2.3 million is being amortized on a straight-line basis as a reduction
to revenue over the 48-month term of the agreement with the remaining balance
recorded in other non-current assets. Monthly usage-based charges and cost
reimbursements will be recognized when earned.
As of June 30, 2002, we have recorded approximately $6.9 in revenue under
the contract with MCI. Included in our consolidated balance sheet as of June 30,
2002 is approximately $3.4 and $3.8 of long-term and short-term deferred
revenue, respectively. These amounts represent advance billings under the
contract. We expensed the costs related to our wholesale business as incurred,
with the exception of certain internal-use software development costs that
qualified for capitalization. We incurred approximately $1.0 million of start-up
costs for our wholesale services, which are shown as wholesale development costs
in the Statement of Operations, and capitalized approximately $2.0 million in
software development costs relating directly to our wholesale services efforts.
On July 21, 2002, WorldCom, Inc. ("WorldCom") and certain of its subsidiary
corporations, including MCI, filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter
11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. Under the Bankruptcy Code a vendor that
provides post-petition goods or services to a debtor on a continuous basis is
entitled to payment for those goods and services on a timely basis if the debtor
wants the vendor to continue supplying the goods or services. Neither the
Bankruptcy Code nor the applicable case law requires vendors to provide
post-petition goods and services to a debtor without payment. The Bankruptcy
Code also entitles a debtor to reject "executory" contracts, that is contracts
where some future act remains to be done, as in the case of our contract with
MCI. A party to a rejected contract may be entitled to damages from the debtor
for breach of contract. However, such a claim would likely be an unsecured
claim. WorldCom's bankruptcy case is in its early stages. At this time we have
no assurance that MCI has the resources to pay its vendors on a timely basis.
Nor do we have any indication that MCI intends to reject our contract.
For MCI's customers provisioned using our company code, we are the customer
of record for the regional bell operating companies wholesale billing. It is
very likely that the state commissions would require us to continue providing
services to MCI's customers for at least the 90-day period contained in the
guidelines described below, regardless of whether MCI continues its relationship
with these customers.
Under the New York Public Service Commission's ("Commission") mass
migration guidelines, when a local exchange carrier discontinues service its
customers must have the ability to migrate to another carrier without
interruption of service. Carriers are required to file an exit plan with the
Commission at least 90 days in advance of discontinuance of service, or must
demonstrate that 90 days' notice was not feasible. Customers must be notified
not less than 60 days prior to discontinuance of service, and a second notice
must be provided if the customer has not taken action to change to a new
provider. Other states in which we and MCI operate are developing similar rules
for carriers exiting markets, generally using the Commission's guidelines as a
framework.
In July 2002, we renegotiated an agreement with a service firm that
provides us with new customer provisioning services through electronic bonding
with the incumbent local exchange carriers. "Provisioning" is the process
whereby we are established as the customer's primary local and long distance
telephone provider. Under this agreement, we have committed to minimum cash
payments, subject to certain adjustments, of approximately $7.0, $14.5, and
$15.7 million for the remainder of 2002 and the years ending December 31, 2003
and 2004, respectively. We make payments monthly according to the contract. This
contract provides, under certain circumstances, for early termination and
severance fees for such action.
24
In August 2002, we made loans to two employees in the approximate amounts
of $0.1 and $0.9 million. These loans were to cover margin balances and prevent
the liquidation of the employees' holdings of our common stock. The loans are
currently demand loans bearing interest at an annual rate equal to the prime
rate plus 2%. We anticipate establishing terms whereby the employees will begin
repayment of the principal balances.
Our common stock is currently traded on the Nasdaq National Market. For
continued listing on the National Market, Nasdaq requires, among other things,
that listed securities maintain a minimum bid price of not less than $3.00 per
share. By letter dated February 14, 2002, Nasdaq advised us that we are not in
compliance with the National Market's continuing listing standards because our
stock price had closed below $3 per share for 30 consecutive trading days. The
letter gave us 90 days, or until May 15, 2002, to regain compliance or our
securities would be delisted from the Nasdaq National Market. By letter dated
May 23, 2002, Nasdaq informed us that we had not regained compliance and that
our securities would be delisted from the Nasdaq National Market at the opening
of business May 31, 2002. On May 29, 2002, we filed an application with Nasdaq
to transfer our securities to the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. That filing stayed the
delisting process pending the approval or disapproval of the application. Nasdaq
allows National Market issuers to downlist from the National Market to the
SmallCap Market provided they meet the SmallCap Market's continuing listing
standards, which include a minimum bid price of not less than $1.00 per share
and a market value of listed securities of at least $35 million. By letter dated
June 28, 2002, Nasdaq disapproved our application for transfer to the SmallCap
Market based upon our failure to meet the $35 million market capitalization of
listed securities requirement. We promptly requested a hearing before the Nasdaq
Hearing Panel. Since that time the market value of our listed securities has
reached and exceeded $35 million so that we meet the Nasdaq SmallCap Market's
continuing listing standards. At the hearing held August 8, 2002 we requested a
delay in delisting to reassess our compliance with the SmallCap listing
requirements. A decision from the Nasdaq Hearing Panel is pending. If not listed
on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, our common stock may be eligible for trading on
the OTC Bulletin Board or other over-the-counter markets, although there can be
no assurance that our common stock will be eligible for trading on any
alternative exchanges or markets. Among other consequences, moving from the
Nasdaq National Market to the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, or trading on the OTC
Bulletin Board, may cause reduced liquidity in the trading market for our common
stock and difficulty for us in obtaining future financing.
Net cash provided by operating activities improved by $27.5 million to $4.8
million provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2002,
compared to net cash used in operating activities of $22.7 million for the same
period in the prior year. The $115.0 million improvement to net loss was off-set
by a negative contribution from nearly all the other items included in the
calculation of cash provided by operating activities, with the exception of the
increase in deferred revenue. This is a result of the cost reduction measures we
have taken over the last year.
Included in our net cash provided by operating activities for the six
months ended June 30, 2002 was the sale of $74.5 million of receivables, for net
proceeds of $58.1 million. This compared to the sale of $80.1 million of
receivables, for net proceeds of $57.7 million for the six months ended June 30,
2001. At June 30, 2002, a net receivable servicing asset of $12.0 million is
included in accounts receivable and $4.8 million of advances on unbilled
receivables are included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities. The costs
relating to the agreement of $0.7 million are included in interest and other
expense for the six months ended June 30, 2002.
The RFC agreement allows us to sell up to $25 million of receivables,
subject to a selection criteria utilized by RFC for receivables they agree to
purchase. There are no minimum sales requirements under this agreement. RFC
purchased receivables from us during the six months ended June 30, 2002 at
discount rates of 32% and 23%; this rate is negotiated and may change according
to collection experience. Our collection percentage since the inception of the
agreement through June 30, 2002 is 90%. Under the agreement we are responsible
for the continued servicing of the receivables sold and any amount collected
over the discount rate is paid to us by RFC for providing the servicing less
certain fees. In July 2002, we renewed the RFC agreement for an additional two
years under substantially similar terms.
Our net cash used in investing activities increased by $2.4 million to
$11.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002, compared to $9.4 million
for the same period in the prior year. This change is primarily a result of
increased capital expenditures and software development for our wholesale
services segment. We expect to make
25
purchases of property and equipment in the future to meet the needs of our
wholesale services. We anticipate increased capital expenditures during 2002,
although at a rate less than that experienced through June 30, 2002.
Our net cash used in financing activities decreased by $2.1 million to $2.8
million for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 compared to $4.9 million for the
same period in the prior year. This change is primarily a result of a decrease
in debt payments. We had a balloon debt payment that was made in 2001. We expect
to have a low amount of long-term debt although we would likely move from the
existing accounts receivable agreement to a more traditional loan, if such
opportunity would arise with terms we deemed appropriate. Our existing debt is
primarily fixed interest that is payable in monthly installments.
Our short-term liquidity relies heavily upon our accounts receivable
agreement, cash used or provided from operations, cash management strategies,
our wholesale service agreement with MCI and if needed, our ability to reduce
certain discretionary capital and marketing expenses and the reduction of
headcount to fulfill any short term cash requirements. We have historically had
negative cash flows and although we have achieved positive EBITDA and expect to
achieve positive cash flows during 2002 we also are aware of the risks,
discussed throughout this document, of not achieving our goal.
Our ongoing capital requirements will depend on several factors, including
market acceptance of our services, specifically our new wholesale services and
our small business product, the amount of resources we devote to investments in
our networks, facilities, build-out of additional enterprise management centers,
services development, the integration of new service offerings and technology
into our existing services and brand promotions, the resources we devote to
sales and marketing of our services, and other factors. As growth and
opportunities arise, we expect to make strategic investments in technology and
our network architecture and enter potential strategic alliances or partnerships
with other entities.
We will make investments in sales and marketing to build our overall "Z"
brand, build strategic partnerships, and develop new service offerings in an
attempt to attract new customers. We will focus on what we expect to be more
attractive distribution channels, which are expected to achieve effective
acquisition costs per subscriber. Sales and marketing will continue to be used
as a discretionary expense to help us manage our overall liquidity.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We do not enter into financial instruments for trading or speculative
purposes and do not currently utilize derivative financial instruments. Our
operations are conducted primarily in the United States and as such are not
subject to material foreign currency exchange rate risk.
The fair value of our investment portfolio or related income would not be
significantly impacted by either a 100 basis point increase or decrease in
interest rates due mainly to the short-term nature of the major portion of our
investment portfolio.
We have no material future earnings or cash flow exposures from changes in
interest rates on our long-term debt obligations, as substantially all of our
long-term debt obligations are fixed rate obligations.
PART II
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Case No. 01 CV 5074: In re Z-Tel Technologies, Inc. Initial Public Offering
Securities Litigation, Master File No. 21 MC 92 (SAS), in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York (original complaint filed
June 7, 2001; Second Corrected Amended Complaint filed July 12, 2002).
During June and July 2001, three separate class action lawsuits were filed
against the Company, certain of the Company's current and former directors and
officers (the "D&Os") and firms engaged in the underwriting (the
26
"Underwriters") of our initial public offering of stock (the "IPO"). The
lawsuits, along with approximately 310 other similar lawsuits filed against
other issuers arising out of IPO allocations, have been assigned to a Judge in
the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for
pretrial coordination. The lawsuits against the Company have been consolidated
into a single action. A consolidated amended complaint was filed on April 20,
2002. A Second Corrected Amended Complaint (the "Amended Complaint"), which is
the operative complaint, was filed on July 12, 2002.
The Amended Complaint is based on the allegations that the Company's
registration statement on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission ("SEC") in connection with the IPO, contained untrue statements of
material fact and omitted to state facts necessary to make the statements made
not misleading by failing to disclose that the underwriters had received
additional, excessive and undisclosed commissions from, and had entered into
unlawful tie-in and other arrangements with, certain customers to whom they
allocated shares in the IPO. The plaintiffs in the Amended Complaint assert
claims against the Company and the D&Os pursuant to Section 11 of the Securities
Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule
10b-5 promulgated by the SEC thereunder. The plaintiffs in the Amended Complaint
assert claims against the D&Os pursuant to Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities
Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and Rule 10b-5 promulgated by the SEC thereunder. The plaintiffs seek an
undisclosed amount of damages, as well as pre-judgment and post-judgment
interest, costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees, experts' fees and other
costs and disbursements. On July 15, 2002, the Company and the individual
defendants moved to dismiss all claims against them. The Court has not ruled on
this motion. Discovery is stayed pending the outcome of the motion to dismiss.
We intend to vigorously defend against this lawsuit. Furthermore, we believe we
are entitled to indemnification from our Underwriters.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
At the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 29, 2002, the following
proposal was adopted by the margins indicated:
1. To elect the following individuals to our Board of Directors:
NUMBER OF SHARES
--------------------
Nominee
Withheld For
---------- ------
Charles D. Hyman.................................... 31,964,116 60,917
Andrew C. Cowen..................................... 31,964,116 60,917
John K. Aurell...................................... 31,964,116 60,917
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) The following exhibits are filed as part of this report (exhibits marked
with an asterisk have been previously filed with the Commission as
indicated, and are incorporated herein by this reference):
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------ -----------
3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Z-Tel, as
amended(A)*
3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws of Z-Tel(B)*
4.1 Form of Common Stock Certificate(B)*
4.2 See Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2 of this Form for provisions of the Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, and the Bylaws
of Z-Tel defining rights of security holders
27
4.3 Stock Purchase Agreement, dated July 6, 2000, by and between the
Registrant and the various purchasers of the Registrant's Series D
Convertible Preferred Stock(C)*
4.4 Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Relative Rights,
Qualifications, Limitations and Restrictions relating to the
Registrant's Series D Convertible Preferred Stock(C)*
4.5 Form of Registration Rights Agreement by and between the Registrant
and each of the purchasers of the Registrant's Series D Convertible
Preferred Stock(C)*
4.6 Form of Warrant for the purchase of shares of common stock of the
Registrant by each of the purchasers of the Registrant's Series D
Convertible Preferred Stock(C)*
4.7 Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated October 19, 2000, by and
among the Registrant and The 1818 Fund III, L.P.(D)*
4.8 Certificate of Designation of 8% Convertible Preferred Stock, Series
E, Setting Forth the Powers, Preferences, Rights, Qualifications,
Limitations and Restrictions of Such Series of Preferred Stock, as
amended(A)*
28
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------ -----------
4.9 Registration Rights Agreement between and among the Registrant and The
1818 Fund III, L.P.(D)*
4.10 Warrant for the purchase of shares of common stock of the Registrant
by The 1818 Fund III, L.P.(D)*
4.11 Certificate of Designation of Series F Junior Participating Preferred
Stock(E)*
4.12 Rights Agreement dated as of February 19, 2001 between Z-Tel
Technologies, Inc. and American Stock Transfer Trust Company, as
Rights Agent, as amended July 2, 2001(E)*
4.13 Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 2, 2001, by and
between Z-Tel, D. Gregory Smith, and others(F)
4.14 Warrant for the Purchase of Shares of Common Stock of Z-Tel, dated as
of July 2, 2001(G)*
4.15 Certificate of Designation for the Series G Preferred Stock(H)*
4.16 Backup Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 2, 2001, by and among
Z-Tel Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned
subsidiary of Z-Tel, Touch 1 Communications, Inc., an Alabama
corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Z-Tel, D. Gregory Smith
and others(I)*
4.17 Additional Investor Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 2,
2001, between Z-Tel, D. Gregory Smith and others(J)*
4.18 Voting Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2001, between Z-Tel and certain
stockholders of Z-Tel(K)*
4.19 Employee Stock Restriction Agreement, dated September 1, 1999, by and
between the Company and D. Gregory Smith(L)*
29
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------ -----------
10.2.1 1998 Equity Participation Plan(B)*
10.2.2 2000 Equity Participation Plan(M)*
10.4 Receivables Sales Agreement dated as of July 27, 2000 by and between
Z-Tel Communications, Inc., as seller and subservicer, Touch 1
Communications, Inc., as seller and subservicer, and RFC Capital
Corporation, as purchaser(C)*
10.5 Form of Indemnification Agreement for executive officers and directors
of the Company(E)*
10.6 Loan and Guaranty Agreement dated January 11, 2001 between the Company
and James A. Kitchen(E)*
10.7 Secured Promissory Note dated January 11, 2001 delivered by James A.
Kitchen to the Company(E)*
10.8 Pledge and Security Agreement dated January 11, 2001 between James A.
Kitchen and the Company(E)*
10.10 Promissory Note, dated May 11, 1999, between Touch 1 Communications,
Inc. and Corman Elegre Capital(D)*
10.11 Promissory Note, dated September 10, 1999, from Touch 1
Communications, Inc. and William F. Corman (First Revocable Trust)(D)*
10.12 Promissory Note, dated September 10, 1999, from Touch 1
Communications, Inc. and James F. Corman(D)*
99.1 Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1350
99.2 Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1350
------------
*
(A) Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to the
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2001, filed on August 13, 2001.
(B) Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-89063),
originally filed October 14, 1999, as amended and as effective December 14,
1999.
(C) Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibits to the
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2000, filed on August 14, 2000.
(D) Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibits to the
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2000, filed on November 14, 2000.
30
(E) Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibits to the
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended
December 31, 2000, filed on March 30, 2001.
(F) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to Amendment No. 1 of the Schedule
13D filed July 12, 2001 with respect to Z-Tel's common stock by, among
other persons, The 1818 Fund III, L.P.
(G) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to Amendment No. 1 of the Schedule
13D filed July 12, 2001 with respect to Z-Tel's common stock by, among
other persons, The 1818 Fund III, L.P.
(H) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to Amendment No. 1 of the Schedule
13D filed July 12, 2001 with respect to Z-Tel's common stock by, among
other persons, The 1818 Fund III, L.P.
(I) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to Amendment No. 1 of the Schedule
13D filed July 12, 2001 with respect to Z-Tel's common stock by, among
other persons, The 1818 Fund III, L.P.
(J) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 5 to the Schedule 13D filed July 24,
2001 with respect to Z-Tel's common stock by, among other persons, D.
Gregory Smith.
(K) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 5 to Amendment No. 1 of the Schedule
13D filed July 12, 2001 with respect to Z-Tel's common stock by, among
other persons, The 1818 Fund III, L.P.
(L) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 7 to the Schedule 13D filed July 24,
2001 with respect to Z-Tel's common stock by, among other persons, D.
Gregory Smith.
(M) Incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the Registrant's Preliminary
Proxy Statement filed on April 14, 2000, with the following amendment
effective May 31, 2001:
Section 2.1(a) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as
follows:
The shares of stock subject to Options, awards of Restricted Stock,
Performance Awards, Dividend Equivalents, awards of Deferred Stock,
Stock Payments or Stock Appreciation Rights shall be Common Stock,
initially shares of the Company's Common Stock, par value $0.01 per
share. The aggregate number of such shares which may be issued upon
exercise of such options or rights or upon any such awards under the
Plan shall be Four Million Five Hundred Thousand (4,500,000) plus an
annual increase to be added on the first day of the Company's fiscal
year beginning in 2001 equal to the lesser of (i) Three Million
(3,000,000) shares of the Company's Common Stock, (ii) 6% of the
outstanding shares on such date, or (iii) a lesser amount determined
by the Board. The shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of
such options or rights or upon any such awards may be either
previously authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K.
None.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, as of the 14th day of
August, 2002.
Z-TEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Registrant)
By: /s/ HORACE J. DAVIS III
------------------------------------
Senior Vice-President -
Chief Financial Officer
(Authorized officer of Registrant
and principal financial officer)
31