e10vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the year ended December 31, 2009
Commission file number 1-1396
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
34-0196300 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification Number) |
incorporation or organization) |
|
|
|
|
|
Eaton Center |
|
|
Cleveland, Ohio
|
|
44114-2584 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
|
|
Name of each exchange on |
Title of each class
|
|
which registered |
|
|
|
Common Share ($.50 par value)
|
|
The New York Stock Exchange |
|
|
The Chicago Stock Exchange |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13
or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety days. Yes þ No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation
S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and
smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June
30, 2009 was $7.4 billion.
As of January 31, 2010, there were 166.4 million Common Shares outstanding.
Documents Incorporated By Reference
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 2010 annual shareholders meeting are incorporated by
reference into Part III.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part I
Item 1. Business.
Eaton Corporation is a diversified power management company with 2009 sales of $11.9 billion. Eaton
is a global technology leader in electrical components and systems for power quality, distribution
and control; hydraulics components, systems and services for industrial and mobile equipment;
aerospace fuel, hydraulics and pneumatic systems for commercial and military use; and truck and
automotive drivetrain and powertrain systems for performance, fuel economy and safety. Eaton has
approximately 70,000 employees in over 50 countries, and sells products to customers in more than
150 countries.
Eaton electronically files or furnishes reports pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) to the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC), including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current
reports on Form 8-K, and proxy and information statements, as well as any amendments to those
reports. As soon as reasonably practicable, these reports are available free of charge through the
Companys Internet web site at http://www.eaton.com. These filings are also accessible on the SECs
Internet web site at http://www.sec.gov.
In 2009, Eaton acquired a business and entered into a joint venture for combined net cash purchase
prices of $10. The Statements of Consolidated Income include the results of these businesses from
the dates of acquisition or formation. A summary of these transactions follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of |
|
Business |
|
|
Acquired business |
|
acquisition |
|
segment |
|
Annual sales |
Micro Innovation Holding AG |
|
September 1, |
|
Electrical |
|
$33 for 2008 |
A Switzerland-based manufacturer of human |
|
2009 |
|
Rest of |
|
|
machine interfaces, programmable logic |
|
|
|
World |
|
|
controllers and input/output devices.
Eaton acquired the remaining shares to increase
its ownership from 50% to 100%. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEG Middle East Power Solutions & Switchboard Manufacture LLC |
|
July 2, |
|
Electrical |
|
$10 for 2008 |
A 49%-owned joint venture to manufacture low |
|
2009 |
|
Rest of |
|
|
voltage switchboards and control panel
assemblies for use in the Middle East power
generation and industrial markets |
|
|
|
World |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Segment Information
Information by business segment and geographic region regarding principal products, principal
markets, methods of distribution, net sales, operating profit and assets is presented in Business
Segment & Geographic Region Information on pages 48
through 52. Additional information regarding
Eatons segments and business is presented below.
Electrical Americas and Electrical Rest of World
Seasonal Fluctuations In normal economic cycles, sales of these segments are historically lower
in the first quarter and higher in the third and fourth quarters of a year.
Significant Customers Approximately 11% of the sales of the Electrical Americas segment in 2009
were made to one large distributor of electrical products.
Competition Principal methods of competition in these segments are performance of products and
systems, technology, customer service and support, and price. Eaton has a strong competitive
position in relation to the many competitors in this segment and, with respect to many products, is
considered among the market leaders.
Hydraulics
Seasonal Fluctuations Sales of this segment are historically higher in the first and second
quarters and lower in the third and fourth quarters of the year.
Competition Principal methods of competition in this segment are product performance, geographic
coverage, service and price. Eaton has a strong competitive position in relation to the many
competitors in this segment and, with respect to many products, is considered among the market
leaders.
Page 2
Aerospace
Significant Customers Approximately 13% of this segments sales in 2009 were made to one large
manufacturer of aircraft.
Competition Principal methods of competition in this segment are total cost of ownership, product
and system performance, quality, design engineering capabilities and timely delivery. Eaton has a
strong competitive position in relation to the many competitors in this segment and, with respect
to many products and platforms, is considered among the market leaders.
Truck
Significant Customers Approximately 54% of this segments sales in 2009 were made to four large
manufacturers of heavy-, medium-, and light-duty trucks and off-highway vehicles.
Competition Principal methods of competition in this segment are product performance, service
and price. Eaton has a strong competitive position in relation to the many competitors in this
segment and, with respect to many products, is considered among the market leaders.
Automotive
Seasonal Fluctuations Sales of this segment historically are lower in the third quarter of the
year as a result of the normal seasonal pattern of automotive industry production.
Significant Customers Approximately 29% of this segments sales in 2009 were made to two large
manufacturers of vehicles.
Competition Principal methods of competition in this segment are product performance, service
and price. Eaton has a strong competitive position in relation to the many competitors in this
segment and, with respect to many products, is considered among the market leaders.
Information Concerning Eatons Business in General
Raw Materials - Eatons major requirements for raw materials include iron, steel, copper, nickel,
aluminum, brass, silver, molybdenum, titanium, vanadium, rubber, plastic and insulating materials.
Materials are purchased in various forms, such as extrusions, castings, powder metal, metal sheets
and strips, forging billets, bar stock and plastic pellets. Raw materials, as well as parts and
other components, are purchased from many suppliers and, under normal circumstances, the Company
had no difficulty obtaining them. In 2009, prices decreased for some basic metals purchased by
Eaton through the second quarter, with some prices rising during the second half of 2009 due to
optimism that the global economic slow down was over and recovery was beginning. The Company
maintained appropriate levels of inventory to guard against basic metals shortages, and did not
experience any general availability constraints in 2009.
Patents and Trademarks - Eaton views its name and mark as significant to its business as a whole.
Eatons products are marketed with a portfolio of patents, trademarks, licenses or other forms of
intellectual property that expire at various dates in the future. Eaton develops and acquires new
intellectual property on an ongoing basis and considers all of its intellectual property to be
valuable. Based on the broad scope of Eatons product lines, management believes that the loss or
expiration of any single intellectual property right would not have a material effect on the
results of operations or financial position of Eaton or its business segments. Eatons policy is to
file applications and obtain patents for its new products including product modifications and
improvements.
Order Backlog - Since a significant portion of open orders placed with Eaton by original equipment manufactures of trucks, off-highway vehicles and passenger
cars are historically subject to month to month releases by customers during each model year, these orders are not considered firm.
In measuring backlog of orders, the Company includes only the amount
of those orders to which customers are firmly committed as of the dates listed.
Using this criterion, total backlog at December 31, 2009 and 2008
was approximately $2.7 billion and $3.2 billion, respectively. Backlog should not be relied upon as
being indicative of results of operations for future periods.
Research and Development - Research and development expenses (in millions) for new products and
improvement of existing products in 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $395, $417 and $335, respectively.
Over the past five years, the Company has invested approximately $1.7 billion in research and
development.
Protection of the Environment - Operations of the Company involve the use and disposal of certain
substances regulated under environmental protection laws. Eaton continues to modify certain
processes on an ongoing, regular basis in order to reduce the impact on the environment, including
the reduction or elimination of certain chemicals used in, and wastes generated from, operations.
Compliance with Federal, State and local provisions which have been enacted or adopted regulating
the discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the
environment, are not expected to have a material adverse effect upon earnings or the competitive
position of the Company. Eatons estimated capital expenditures for environmental control
facilities are not expected to be material for 2010 and 2011. Information regarding the Companys
liabilities related to environmental matters is presented in Protection of the Environment & Sustainability on
page 38.
Page 3
Foreign Operations - Financial information related to Eatons foreign operations is presented in
Geographic Region Information on page 50. Information regarding risks that may affect
Eatons foreign operations is presented in Item 1A of this Form 10-K Report.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Among the risks that could materially adversely affect Eatons businesses, financial condition or
results of operations are the following:
Uncertainty regarding the rate of recovery in the global end markets that Eaton serves.
As a result of the global economic downturn, Eatons end markets significantly declined during the
first half of 2009. While most of Eatons markets have begun to recover, certain markets that are
characterized as late cycle markets are still declining. While Eaton remains optimistic about a
global economic recovery, there is still substantial uncertainty about the rate of that recovery.
Eatons segment revenues, operating results and profitability have varied in the past and may vary
from quarter to quarter in the future. Profitability can be negatively impacted by volatility in
the end markets that Eaton serves. The Company has undertaken measures to reduce the impact of this
volatility through diversification of markets it serves and expansion of geographic regions in
which it operates. Future downturns in any of the markets that Eaton serves could adversely affect
the Companys revenues, operating results and profitability.
Eatons operating results depend in part on continued successful research, development and
marketing of new and/or improved products and services, and there can be no assurance that Eaton
will continue to successfully introduce new products and services.
The success of new and improved products and services depends on their initial and continued
acceptance by Eatons customers. The Companys businesses are affected, to varying degrees, by
technological change and corresponding shifts in customer demand, which could result in
unpredictable product transitions or shortened life cycles. Eaton may experience difficulties or
delays in the research, development, production or marketing of new products and services which may
prevent Eaton from recouping or realizing a return on the investments required to bring new
products and services to market. The end result could be a negative impact on the Companys
operating results.
Eatons operations depend on production facilities throughout the world, many of which are located
outside the United States and are subject to greater risks of disrupted production.
Eaton manages businesses with manufacturing facilities worldwide. In recent years, the Companys
operations outside the United States have increased significantly in relative size in comparison to
its total operations. The Companys manufacturing facilities and operations could be disrupted by a
natural disaster, or labor strike, war, political unrest, terrorist activity or public health
concerns. Some of Eatons non-United States manufacturing facilities also may be more susceptible
to economic and political upheaval than Eatons United States facilities. Any such disruption could
cause delays in shipments of products and the loss of sales and customers, and insurance proceeds
may not adequately compensate the Company for the losses.
Eatons substantial foreign sales subject it to economic risk as Eatons results of operations may
be adversely affected by changes in local government regulations and policies and foreign currency
fluctuations.
As noted above in Item 1 Foreign Operations, a significant portion of Eatons sales are to
customers outside the United States, and the Company expects sales in foreign markets to continue
to represent a significant portion of its total sales. Foreign sales and operations are subject to
changes in local government regulations and policies, including those related to tariffs and trade
barriers, investments, property ownership rights, taxation, exchange controls and repatriation of
earnings. Changes in the relative values of currencies occur from time to time and could affect
Eatons operating results. While
the Company monitors exchange rate exposures and attempts to reduce these exposures through hedging
activities, these risks could adversely affect the Companys operating results.
Page 4
Eaton
uses a variety of raw materials and components in its businesses, and significant shortages,
price increases or suppliers insolvencies could increase operating costs and adversely impact the competitive positions of
Eatons products.
Eatons
major requirements for raw materials are described above in Item 1 Raw Materials.
Significant shortages could affect the prices Eatons affected businesses are charged and the
competitive position of their products and services, all of which could adversely affect Eatons
results of operations.
Further, Eatons suppliers of component parts may increase their prices in response to
increases in costs of raw materials that they use to manufacture component parts. As a result, the
Company may not be able to increase its prices commensurately with its increased costs. Consequently, the
Companys results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Finally, while Eaton carefully monitors the viability of each of its suppliers, the global economic downturn has,
and may continue to have, an adverse impact on Eatons suppliers liquidity and solvency. Should one or more of Eatons
material suppliers become insolvent, Eaton could be required to pay increased prices for affected raw materials or components,
or experience difficulty in replacing the insolvent supplier, either of which could adversely affect Eatons results of operations.
Eaton engages in acquisitions and joint ventures, and may encounter unexpected difficulties
identifying, pricing or integrating those businesses.
Eaton seeks to grow, in part, through strategic acquisitions and joint ventures, which are intended
to complement or expand the Companys businesses, and expects to continue to do so in the future.
The success of this strategy will depend on Eatons ability to identify, price, finance and
complete these transactions or arrangements. Success will also depend on the Companys ability to
integrate the businesses acquired in these transactions and to develop satisfactory working
arrangements with the Companys strategic partners in the joint ventures. Eaton may encounter
unexpected difficulties in completing and integrating acquisitions with Eatons existing
operations, and in managing strategic investments. Furthermore, the Company may not realize the
degree, or timing, of benefits Eaton anticipated when it first entered into a transaction. Any of
the foregoing could adversely affect the Companys business and results of operations.
Eaton may be unable to adequately protect its intellectual property rights, which could affect the
Companys ability to compete.
Protecting Eatons intellectual property rights is critical to its ability to compete and succeed.
The Company owns a large number of United States and foreign patents and patent applications, as
well as trademark and copyright registrations that are necessary, and contribute significantly, to
the preservation of Eatons competitive position in various markets. Although management believes
that the loss or expiration of any single intellectual property right would not have a material
effect on the results of operations or financial position of Eaton or its business segments, there
can be no assurance that any one, or more, of these patents and other intellectual property will
not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented by third parties. Eaton enters into confidentiality
and invention assignment agreements with the Companys employees, and into non-disclosure
agreements with Eatons suppliers and appropriate customers so as to limit access to and disclosure
of the Companys proprietary information. These measures may not suffice to deter misappropriation
or independent third party development of similar technologies. Moreover, the protection provided
to Eatons intellectual property by the laws and courts of foreign nations may not be as
advantageous to Eaton as the remedies available under United States law.
Eaton is subject to litigation and environmental regulations that could adversely impact Eatons
businesses.
At any given time, Eaton may be subject to litigation, the disposition of which may have a material
adverse effect on the Companys businesses, financial condition or results of operations.
Information regarding the Companys current legal proceedings is presented in Protection of the
Environment & Sustainability, Contingencies and Meritor
Litigation on pages 38 and 39.
Eaton participates in markets that are competitive and Eatons results could be adversely impacted
by competitors actions.
Eatons businesses operate in competitive markets. The Company competes against other global
manufacturers and service providers on the basis of product performance, quality and price, in
addition to other factors. While Eatons product development and quality initiatives have been
competitive strengths in the past, actions by Eatons competitors could lead to downward pressure
on prices and/or a decline in the Companys market share, either of which could adversely affect
Eatons results.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.
Page 5
Item 2. Properties.
Eatons world headquarters is located in Cleveland, Ohio. The Company maintains manufacturing
facilities at 210 locations in 33 countries. The Company is a lessee under a number of operating
leases for certain real properties and equipment, none of which is material to its operations.
Management believes that the existing manufacturing facilities are adequate for operations, and
these facilities are maintained in good condition.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
Information regarding the Companys current legal proceedings is presented in Protection of the
Environment & Sustainability, Contingencies and Meritor
Litigation on pages 38 and 39.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
Information regarding executive officers of the Company is presented in Item 10 of this Form 10-K
Report.
Part II
Item 5. Market for the Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
The Companys common shares are listed for trading on the New York and Chicago stock exchanges.
Information regarding cash dividends paid, and the high and low market price per common share for
each quarter in 2009 and 2008, is presented in Quarterly
Data on page 73. At December 31, 2009,
there were 8,452 holders of record of the Companys common shares. Additionally, 17,960 current and
former employees were shareholders through participation in the Eaton Savings Plan (ESP), Eaton
Personal Investment Plan (EPIP), and the Eaton Electrical de Puerto Rico Inc. Retirement Savings
Plan.
Information regarding equity compensation plans required by Regulation S-K Item 201(d) is provided
in Item 12 of this Form 10-K Report.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
Information regarding selected financial data is presented in the Ten-Year Consolidated Financial
Summary on page 74.
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
Managements Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition & Results of Operations is presented on
pages 53 through 72.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Information
regarding market risk is presented in Market Risk
Disclosure on page 66.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
The report of the independent registered public accounting firm, consolidated financial statements,
and notes to consolidated financial statements are presented on pages
14 through 52.
Information regarding selected quarterly financial information for 2009 and 2008 is presented in
Quarterly Data on page 73.
Item 9. Change in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures Pursuant to SEC Rule 13a-15, an evaluation was
performed under the supervision and with the participation of Eatons management, including
Alexander M. Cutler Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; President; and Richard H. Fearon Vice
Chairman and Chief Financial and Planning Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation
of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, Eatons management
concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31,
2009.
Page 6
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed
in Company reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported, within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and
procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in Company reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting as of December 31, 2009 is
presented on page 16.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm relating to internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 is presented on page
15.
During the fourth quarter of 2009, there was no change in Eatons internal control over financial
reporting that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Eatons internal
control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information.
None.
Part III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
Information required with respect to the directors of the Company is set forth under the caption
Election of Directors in the Companys definitive Proxy Statement to be filed on or about March
19, 2010, and is incorporated by reference.
A listing of the Companys executive officers, their ages, positions and offices held over the past
five years, as of February 1, 2010, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position (Date elected to position) |
Alexander M. Cutler |
|
58 |
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; President
(August 1, 2000 present)
Director (September 22, 1993 present) |
|
|
|
|
|
Richard H. Fearon |
|
53 |
|
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial and
Planning Officer
(April 24, 2002 present) |
|
|
|
|
|
Craig Arnold |
|
49 |
|
Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer Industrial Sector
(February 1, 2009 present)
Chief Executive Officer Fluid Power Group
(October 25, 2000 January 31, 2009) |
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas S. Gross |
|
55 |
|
Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer Electrical Sector
(February 1, 2009 present)
President Power Quality and Control Business
(April 1, 2008 January 31, 2009)
Vice President and President Power Quality Solutions Operations
(May 16, 2005 March 31, 2008)
Vice President Power Quality Solutions Operations
(July 29, 2004 May 15, 2005)
Vice President Eaton Business System
(July 23, 2003 July 28, 2004) |
|
|
|
|
|
James W. McGill |
|
54 |
|
Executive Vice President Chief Human Resources Officer
(January 1, 2010 present)
President Asia-Pacific Region
(April 1, 2008 December 31, 2009)
Vice President Asia-Pacific
(April 1, 2006 March 31, 2008)
Vice President Eaton Business System
(July 29, 2004 March 31, 2006) |
Page 7
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position (Date elected to position) |
Mark M. McGuire |
|
52 |
|
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
(December 1, 2005 present)
Vice President and Deputy General Counsel,
International Paper Company (2003 2005) |
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas E. Moran |
|
45 |
|
Senior Vice President and Secretary
(October 1, 2008 present)
Assistant Secretary and Managing Counsel, The Dow
Chemical Company (2002 2008) |
|
|
|
|
|
Billie K. Rawot |
|
58 |
|
Senior Vice President and Controller
(March 1, 1991 present) |
|
|
|
|
|
Kurt B. McMaken |
|
40 |
|
Senior Vice President Corporate Development and Treasury
(February 1, 2009 present)
Vice President Corporate Development and Planning
(January 1, 2008 January 31, 2009)
Director Corporate Planning
(April 1, 2006 December 31, 2007)
Director Corporate Development
(October 1, 2004 March 30, 2006) |
There are no family relationships among the officers listed, and there are no arrangements or
understandings pursuant to which any of them were elected as officers. All officers hold office for
one year and until their successors are elected and qualified, unless otherwise specified by the
Board of Directors; provided, however, that any officer is subject to removal with or without
cause, at any time, by a vote of a majority of the Board of Directors.
Information required with respect to compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act is set forth
under the caption Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance in the Companys
definitive Proxy Statement to be filed on or about March 19, 2010, and is incorporated by
reference.
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics, which applies to the Directors, officers and employees
worldwide. This document is available on the Companys website at http://www.eaton.com.
There were no changes during fourth quarter 2009 to the procedures by which security holders may
recommend nominees to the Companys Board of Directors.
Information related to the Companys Audit Committee, and members of the Committee that are
financial experts, is set forth under the caption Board Committees Audit Committee in the
Companys definitive Proxy Statement to be filed on or about March 19, 2010, and is incorporated by
reference.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
Information required with respect to executive compensation is set forth under the caption
Executive Compensation in the Companys definitive Proxy Statement to be filed on or about March
19, 2010, and is incorporated by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
Information required with respect to securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation
plans is set forth under the caption Equity Compensation Plans in the Companys definitive Proxy
Statement to be filed on or about March 19, 2010, and is incorporated by reference.
Information required with respect to security ownership of certain beneficial owners, is set forth
under the caption Share Ownership Tables in the Companys definitive Proxy Statement to be filed
on or about March 19, 2010, and is incorporated by reference.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
Information required with respect to certain relationships and related transactions is set forth
under the caption Review of Related Person Transactions in the Companys definitive Proxy
Statement to be filed on or about March 19, 2010, and is incorporated by reference.
Page 8
Information required with respect to director independence is set forth under the caption Director
Independence in the Companys definitive Proxy Statement to be filed on or about March 19, 2010,
and is incorporated by reference.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
Information required with respect to principal accountant fees and services is set forth under the
caption Audit Committee Report in the Companys definitive Proxy Statement to be filed on or
about March 19, 2010, and is incorporated by reference.
Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) (1) |
The report of the independent registered public accounting firm, consolidated financial
statements and notes to consolidated financial statements are included in Item 8 above: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other schedules for which provision is made in Regulation S-X of the SEC are not
required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and, therefore, have been
omitted. |
|
(3) |
|
Exhibits |
|
3(i) |
|
Amended Articles of Incorporation (amended and restated as of April 24,
2008) - Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-Q Report for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
3(ii) |
|
Amended Regulations (amended and restated as of April 23, 2008) -
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-Q Report for the three months ended March 31,
2008 |
|
|
4(a) |
|
Pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 601(b) (4), the Company agrees to furnish
to the SEC, upon request, a copy of the instruments defining the rights of holders of
its other long-term debt |
|
|
10 |
|
Material contracts |
|
(a) |
|
Senior Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (effective January 1,
2008) - Incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement
dated March 14, 2008 |
|
|
(b) |
|
Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (effective January 1, 2005) -
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
(c) |
|
2005 Non-Employee Director Fee Deferral Plan (2008 restatement) -
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(d) |
|
Deferred Incentive Compensation Plan II (2008 restatement) -
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(e) |
|
Excess Benefits Plan II (2008 restatement) - Incorporated by
reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31,
2007 |
Page 9
|
(f) |
|
Incentive Compensation Deferral Plan II (2008 restatement) -
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(g) |
|
Limited Eaton Service Supplemental Retirement Income Plan II (2008
restatement) - Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for
the year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(h) |
|
Supplemental Benefits Plan II (2008 restatement) - Incorporated by
reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31,
2007 |
|
|
(i) |
|
Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreement (2 year vesting) -
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(j) |
|
Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreement (4 year vesting) -
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(k) |
|
Form of Restricted Share Agreement (2 year vesting) - Incorporated by
reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31,
2007 |
|
|
(l) |
|
Form of Restricted Share Agreement (4 year vesting) - Incorporated by
reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31,
2007 |
|
|
(m) |
|
Form of Restricted Share Agreement (Non-Employee Directors) -
Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Report filed February 1,
2010 |
|
|
(n) |
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for Executives (2008) - Incorporated
by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31,
2007 |
|
|
(o) |
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for Executives - Incorporated by
reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31,
2006 |
|
|
(p) |
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for Non-Employee Directors (2008) -
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(q) |
|
2002 Stock Plan - Incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy
Statement dated March 15, 2002 |
|
|
(r) |
|
2004 Stock Plan - Incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy
Statement dated March 19, 2004 |
|
|
(s) |
|
2008 Stock Plan - Incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy
Statement dated March 14, 2008 |
|
|
(t) |
|
2009 Stock Plan - Incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy
Statement dated March 13, 2009 |
|
|
(u) |
|
Plan for the Deferred Payment of Directors Fees (originally adopted
in 1985 and amended effective September 24, 1996, January 28, 1998,
January 23, 2002, February 24, 2004, December 8, 2004 and, in certain
respects, January 1, 2005) - Incorporated by reference to the Form
10-K Report for the year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(v) |
|
1996 Non-Employee Director Fee Deferral Plan (amended and restated
effective January 1, 2005) - Incorporated by reference to the Form
10-K Report for the year ended December 31, 2006 |
|
|
(w) |
|
Form of Change of Control Agreement entered into with officers of
Eaton Corporation - Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report
for the year ended December 31, 2008 |
Page 10
|
(x) |
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into with officers of Eaton
Corporation - Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for
the year ended December 31, 2002 |
|
|
(y) |
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into with directors of
Eaton Corporation - Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Report
filed January 26, 2007 |
|
|
(z) |
|
Executive Strategic Incentive Plan (amended and restated January 1,
2008) - Incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement
dated March 14, 2008 |
|
|
(aa) |
|
Executive Strategic Incentive Plan II (effective January 1, 2001) -
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2002 |
|
|
(bb) |
|
Supplemental Executive Strategic Incentive Plan (effective as of June
25, 2008) - Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the
year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
|
(cc) |
|
Deferred Incentive Compensation Plan (amended and restated effective
November 1, 2007) - Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K
Report* |
|
|
(dd) |
|
1998 Stock Plan - Incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy
Statement dated March 13, 1998 |
|
|
(ee) |
|
Incentive Compensation Deferral Plan (amended and restated October 1,
1997) - Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the
year ended December 31, 2000 |
|
|
(ff) |
|
Trust Agreement - Officers and Employees (dated December 6, 1996) -
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2002 |
|
|
(gg) |
|
Trust Agreement - Non-employee Directors (dated December 6, 1996)
- Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2002 |
|
|
(hh) |
|
Group Replacement Insurance Plan (GRIP) (effective June 1, 1992) -
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 1992 |
|
|
(ii) |
|
1991 Stock Option Plan - Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K
Report for the year ended December 31, 2002 |
|
|
(jj) |
|
Excess Benefits Plan (amended and restated effective January 1, 1989)
- Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2002 |
|
|
(kk) |
|
Supplemental Benefits Plan (amended and restated January 1, 1989) -
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2002 |
|
|
(ll) |
|
Eaton Corporation Board of Directors Policy on Incentive
Compensation, Stock Options and Other Equity Grants upon the
Restatement of Financial Results - Incorporated by reference to the
Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
12 |
|
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges - Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
|
|
14 |
|
Code of Ethics - Incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement
filed on March 14, 2008 |
|
|
21 |
|
Subsidiaries of Eaton Corporation - Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
Page 11
|
23 |
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - Filed in
conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
|
|
24 |
|
Power of Attorney - Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Form 10-K (Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
Section 302) - Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Form 10-K (Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
Section 302) - Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Form 10-K (Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
Section 906) - Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Form 10-K (Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
Section 906) - Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
|
101.INS |
|
XBRL Instance Document * |
|
|
101.SCH |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document * |
|
|
101.CAL |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document * |
|
|
101.DEF |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document * |
|
|
101.LAB |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document * |
|
|
101.PRE |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document * |
|
|
|
* |
|
Submitted electronically herewith. |
|
|
Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following formatted in XBRL (Extensible
Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2009 and
2008, (iii) Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007 (iv) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December
31, 2009. |
|
|
|
In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101
to this Annual Report on Form 10-K shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and
shall not be part of any registration statement or other document filed under the
Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific
reference in such filing. |
|
(b) |
|
Exhibits |
|
|
|
Certain exhibits required by this portion of Item 15 are filed as a separate section of
this Form 10-K Report. |
Page 12
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eaton Corporation
Registrant
|
|
Date: February 26, 2010 |
/s/ Richard H. Fearon
|
|
|
Richard H. Fearon |
|
|
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial and
Planning Officer |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date
indicated.
Date: February 26, 2010
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alexander M. Cutler
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; President;
Principal Executive Officer; Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Billie K. Rawot
|
|
Senior Vice President and Controller;
Principal Accounting Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Todd M. Bluedorn
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Critelli
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ernie Green
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ned C. Lautenbach
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
John R. Miller
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Victor A. Pelson
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher M. Connor
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles E. Golden
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arthur E. Johnson
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deborah L. McCoy
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory R. Page
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary L. Tooker
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
*By
|
|
/s/ Richard H. Fearon
Richard H. Fearon, Attorney-in-Fact
for the officers and directors signing
in the capacities indicated
|
|
|
Page 13
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Eaton Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Eaton Corporation as of December
31, 2009 and 2008, and the related statements of consolidated income, shareholders equity, and
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of Eaton Corporation at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), Eaton Corporations internal control over financial reporting as of December
31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 26,
2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
February 26, 2010
Page 14
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Eaton Corporation
We have audited Eaton Corporations internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Eaton
Corporations management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
included in the accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys internal control over financial reporting
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk,
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Eaton Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Eaton Corporation as of December 31, 2009
and 2008, and the related statements of consolidated income, shareholders equity, and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009 and our report dated February 26,
2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
February 26, 2010
Page 15
MANAGEMENTS REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The management of Eaton Corporation is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-15(f)).
Under the supervision and with the participation of Eatons management, including our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness
of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009. In conducting
this evaluation, we used the framework set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission in Internal Control Integrated Framework. Based on this evaluation
under the framework referred to above, management concluded that the Companys internal control
over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2009.
The independent registered public accounting firm Ernst & Young LLP has issued an audit report on
the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2009. This report is included herein.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard H.
Fearon
|
|
/s/ Billie K.
Rawot |
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief
|
|
Vice Chairman and
|
|
Senior Vice President and |
Executive Officer;
|
|
Chief Financial and Planning
|
|
Controller |
President
|
|
Officer |
|
|
February 26, 2010
Page 16
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31 |
|
(Millions except for per share data) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
11,873 |
|
|
$ |
15,376 |
|
|
$ |
13,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
8,782 |
|
|
|
11,191 |
|
|
|
9,382 |
|
Selling & administrative expense |
|
|
2,252 |
|
|
|
2,513 |
|
|
|
2,139 |
|
Research & development expense |
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
Interest expense-net |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
Other (income) expense-net |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
1,055 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
|
|
973 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
1,008 |
|
Adjustment of net income for noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
|
$ |
994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income per common share diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
|
$ |
6.50 |
|
|
$ |
6.38 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.02 |
|
|
|
.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
|
$ |
6.52 |
|
|
$ |
6.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of common shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
167.9 |
|
|
|
162.3 |
|
|
|
150.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
2.31 |
|
|
$ |
6.58 |
|
|
$ |
6.51 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.02 |
|
|
|
.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2.31 |
|
|
$ |
6.60 |
|
|
$ |
6.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of common shares outstanding basic |
|
|
166.4 |
|
|
|
160.2 |
|
|
|
147.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid per common share |
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
|
$ |
1.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts attributable to common shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
$ |
1,055 |
|
|
$ |
959 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
|
$ |
994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The notes
on pages 23 to 52 are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
Page 17
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
(Millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
$ |
188 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
1,899 |
|
|
|
2,295 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
1,326 |
|
|
|
1,554 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
4,524 |
|
|
|
4,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant & equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land & buildings |
|
|
1,459 |
|
|
|
1,425 |
|
Machinery & equipment |
|
|
4,241 |
|
|
|
4,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross property, plant & equipment |
|
|
5,700 |
|
|
|
5,567 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(3,255 |
) |
|
|
(2,928 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant & equipment |
|
|
2,445 |
|
|
|
2,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
5,435 |
|
|
|
5,232 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
2,441 |
|
|
|
2,518 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
971 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
16,282 |
|
|
$ |
16,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
113 |
|
|
$ |
812 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
1,258 |
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
2,689 |
|
|
|
3,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
3,349 |
|
|
|
3,190 |
|
Pension liabilities |
|
|
1,586 |
|
|
|
1,650 |
|
Other postretirement benefits liabilities |
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
543 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares (166.2 million outstanding in 2009 and 165.0 million in 2008) |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
3,957 |
|
|
|
3,879 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
3,966 |
|
|
|
3,917 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(1,208 |
) |
|
|
(1,538 |
) |
Deferred compensation plans |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eaton shareholders equity |
|
|
6,777 |
|
|
|
6,317 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
6,818 |
|
|
|
6,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities & equity |
|
$ |
16,282 |
|
|
$ |
16,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The notes
on pages 23 to 52 are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
Page 18
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31 |
|
(Millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
385 |
|
|
$ |
1,070 |
|
|
$ |
1,008 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation & amortization |
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
439 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
Pension liabilities, net of contributions |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Gains on sales of businesses |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
Other non-cash items in income |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Changes in working capital, excluding acquisitions & sales of businesses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
|
27 |
|
Accrued income & other taxes |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
Other working capital accounts |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
Cash received from termination of interest rate swaps |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Other-net |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
1,408 |
|
|
|
1,441 |
|
|
|
1,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for property, plant & equipment |
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
(448 |
) |
|
|
(354 |
) |
Cash paid for acquisitions of businesses |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(2,807 |
) |
|
|
(1,433 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of businesses |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
(Purchases) sales of short-term investments-net |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
Other-net |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
(3,190 |
) |
|
|
(1,456 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings
with original maturities of more than three months proceeds |
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
1,656 |
|
|
|
1,652 |
|
Borrowings with original maturities of more than three months payments |
|
|
(887 |
) |
|
|
(984 |
) |
|
|
(979 |
) |
Borrowings with original maturities of less than three months-net,
primarily commercial paper |
|
|
(424 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
62 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
(251 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
Income tax benefit from exercise of employee stock options |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Purchase of common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(340 |
) |
Other-net |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(1,061 |
) |
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total increase in cash |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Cash at the beginning of the year |
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at the end of the year |
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
$ |
188 |
|
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The notes
on pages 23 to 52 are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
Page 19
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Eaton |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
excess of |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
compensation |
|
|
shareholders |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
Total |
|
(Millions) |
|
Shares |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
par value |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
loss |
|
|
plans |
|
|
equity |
|
|
interests |
|
|
equity |
|
Balance at January 1, 2007 |
|
|
146.3 |
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
$ |
2,114 |
|
|
$ |
2,796 |
|
|
$ |
(849 |
) |
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
|
$ |
4,106 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
4,156 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation and related hedging
hedging instruments (including income
tax expense of $14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212 |
|
Deferred loss on cash flow hedges (net of income
income tax benefit of $3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Pensions (net of income tax expense of $101) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214 |
|
Other postretirement benefits (net of income
tax expense of $8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,420 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1,434 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(251 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(251 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(258 |
) |
Issuance of shares under employee benefit plans
(including income tax benefit of $51) |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242 |
|
Purchase of shares by trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Purchase of shares |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(340 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(340 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
146.0 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
2,290 |
|
|
|
3,257 |
|
|
|
(423 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
5,172 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
5,231 |
|
Page 20
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Eaton |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
excess of |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
compensation |
|
|
shareholders |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
Total |
|
(Millions) |
|
Shares |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
par value |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
loss |
|
|
plans |
|
|
equity |
|
|
interests |
|
|
equity |
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
146.0 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
2,290 |
|
|
|
3,257 |
|
|
|
(423 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
5,172 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
5,231 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation and related hedging
instruments (including income tax benefit of $68) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(722 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(722 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(722 |
) |
Deferred loss on cash flow hedges (net of income
tax benefit of $12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
Pensions (net of income tax benefit of $227) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(419 |
) |
Other postretirement benefits (net of income
tax expense of $31) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
Effects of changing retirement benefits plans
measurement date (net of income tax benefit of $8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(333 |
) |
Issuance of shares under employee benefit plans
(including income tax benefit of $16) |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114 |
|
Sale of shares |
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,522 |
|
Purchase of shares by trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Purchase of shares |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
Decrease in noncontrolling interests due to
sale of business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
165.0 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
3,879 |
|
|
|
3,917 |
|
|
|
(1,538 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
6,317 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
6,365 |
|
Page 21
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Eaton |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
excess of |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
compensation |
|
|
shareholders |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
Total |
|
(Millions) |
|
Shares |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
par value |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
loss |
|
|
plans |
|
|
equity |
|
|
interests |
|
|
equity |
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
165.0 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
3,879 |
|
|
|
3,917 |
|
|
|
(1,538 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
6,317 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
6,365 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation and related hedging
instruments (including income taxes of $45) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349 |
|
Deferred gain on cash flow hedges (including
income taxes of $19) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
Pensions (net of income taxes of $42) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Other postretirement benefits (net of income
tax benefit of $14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(339 |
) |
Issuance of shares under employee benefit plans
(including income tax benefit of $3) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
Decrease in noncontrolling interests due to
sale of business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
166.2 |
|
|
$ |
83 |
|
|
$ |
3,957 |
|
|
$ |
3,966 |
|
|
$ |
(1,208 |
) |
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
|
$ |
6,777 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
6,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The notes
on pages 23 to 52 are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
Page 22
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Millions of dollars and shares unless indicated otherwise (per share data assume dilution)
DESCRIPTION OF COMPANY
Eaton Corporation (Eaton or Company) is a diversified power management company with 2009 sales of
$11.9 billion. Eaton is a global technology leader in electrical components and systems for power
quality, distribution and control; hydraulics components, systems and services for industrial and
mobile equipment; aerospace fuel, hydraulics and pneumatic systems for commercial and military use;
and truck and automotive drivetrain and powertrain systems for performance, fuel economy and
safety. Eaton has approximately 70,000 employees in over 50 countries, and sells products to
customers in more than 150 countries.
ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification
In 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued the Accounting Standards
Codification, which establishes a sole source of U.S. authoritative generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP). The Codification is meant to simplify user access to all authoritative
accounting standards by reorganizing U.S. GAAP pronouncements into approximately ninety accounting
topics within a consistent structure; its purpose is not to create new accounting and reporting
standards. Pursuant to the provisions of the Codification, Eaton has updated references to U.S.
GAAP in these consolidated financial statements. The adoption of the Codification did not have an
effect on Eatons financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Business Combinations
In 2009, Eaton adopted the revised Business Combinations Standard, which addresses accounting for
the acquisitions of businesses. Under the revised standard, acquisition costs will be expensed as
incurred; restructuring costs associated with the acquisition will generally be expensed subsequent
to the acquisition date; in-process research and development will be recognized at fair value as an
indefinite-lived asset at the acquisition date; changes in deferred income tax asset valuation
allowances and income tax uncertainties after the acquisition date generally will affect income tax
expense, including changes related to acquisitions of businesses completed prior to 2009; and
noncontrolling interests will be valued at fair value at the acquisition date. The adoption of
this standard did not have a material effect on Eatons financial position, results of operations
or cash flows in 2009 because no businesses were acquired in 2009 that were material. The standard
could have a material effect in 2010, and future years, based on the specific conditions related to
future acquisitions.
Subsequent Events
In 2009, Eaton adopted the new Subsequent Events Standard, as amended, which established general
guidance for accounting and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before
financial statements are issued. Eaton has evaluated subsequent events through the date the
financial statements were issued, noting no events that require adjustment of, or disclosure in,
the consolidated financial statements for the period ended December 31, 2009.
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements
In 2009, Eaton adopted the revised standard related to noncontrolling interests in consolidated
financial statements. This standard clarifies accounting and disclosures related to noncontrolling
interests, sometimes referred to as minority interest, which is the portion of equity in a
subsidiary not owned, directly or indirectly, by Eaton. As a result of the adoption of this
standard, prior period amounts were reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on Eatons financial position, results
of operations or cash flows.
Fair Value Measurements & Disclosures
In 2009, Eaton adopted the additional required guidance of the Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures Standard. This standard addresses accounting and disclosures related to non-financial
assets and liabilities, primarily goodwill, intangible assets, non-financial assets and liabilities
related to acquired businesses, and impairment and restructuring activities. In 2009, Eaton also
adopted the revised guidance for measuring liabilities at fair value. This guidance addresses
circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not
available. The adoption of these
standards did not have a material effect on Eatons financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
Page 23
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Consolidation & Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include accounts of Eaton and all subsidiaries and other
controlled entities. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The equity
method of accounting is used for investments in associate companies where the Company has a 20% to
50% ownership interest. These associate companies are not material either individually, or in the
aggregate, to Eatons financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Eaton does not have off-balance sheet arrangements or financings with unconsolidated entities or
other persons. In the ordinary course of business, the Company leases certain real properties and
equipment, as described in Lease Commitments in the Notes below.
Revenue Recognition
Sales of products are recognized when a sales agreement is in place, products have been shipped to
unaffiliated customers and title has transferred in accordance with shipping terms (FOB shipping
point, FOB destination or equivalent International Commercial (INCO) Terms), the selling price is
fixed and determinable and collectability is reasonably assured, all significant related acts of
performance have been completed, and no other significant uncertainties exist. Shipping and
handling costs billed to customers are included in Net sales and the related costs in Cost of
products sold. Although the majority of the sales agreements contain standard terms and conditions,
there are also agreements that contain multiple elements or non-standard terms and conditions. As a
result, judgement is sometimes required to determine the appropriate accounting, including whether
the deliverables specified in these agreements should be treated as separate units of accounting
for sales recognition purposes, and, if so, how the sales price should be allocated among the
elements and when to recognize sales for each element. For delivered elements, sales are recognized
only when the delivered elements have standalone value, fair values of undelivered elements are
known, there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance, and there are no
customer-negotiated refund or return rights affecting the sales recognized for delivered elements.
Sales for service contracts are generally recognized as the services are provided.
Foreign Currency Translation
The functional currency for all subsidiaries outside the United States is primarily the local
currency. Financial statements for these subsidiaries are translated into United States dollars at
year-end exchange rates as to assets and liabilities and weighted-average exchange rates as to
revenues and expenses. The resulting translation adjustments are recognized in Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) in Equity. Gains and losses related to foreign currency transactions
are recognized in Other (income) expense-net in the Statements of Consolidated Income.
Inventories
Inventories are carried at lower of cost or market. Inventories in the United States are generally
accounted for using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method. Remaining United States and all other
inventories are accounted for using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Cost components include
raw materials, purchased components, direct labor, indirect labor, utilities, depreciation, inbound
freight charges, purchasing and receiving costs, inspection costs, warehousing costs, and costs of
the distribution network.
Depreciation & Amortization
Depreciation and amortization for property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets subject to
amortization, are generally computed by the straight-line method and are included in Cost of
products sold, Selling and administrative expense, and Research and development expense, as
appropriate. Cost of buildings is depreciated over principally 40 years and machinery and equipment
over principally 3 to 10 years. At December 31, 2009, the weighted-average amortization period for
intangible assets subject to amortization was 18 years for patents and technology and 17 years for
customer relationships, primarily as a result of the long life of aircraft platforms. Software is
amortized over a period up to 7 years.
Long-lived assets, except goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets as described in the Notes
below, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the
carrying amount may not be recoverable. Events or
Page 24
circumstances that would result in an impairment review
include operations reporting losses, a significant adverse change in the use of an asset, the
planned disposal or sale of the asset, a significant adverse change in the business climate or
legal factors related to the asset, or a significant decrease in the estimated fair value of an
asset. Upon indications of impairment, assets are grouped with other assets and liabilities at the
lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other
assets and liabilities. The asset group would be considered impaired when the estimated future net
undiscounted cash flows generated by the asset group are less than its carrying value. In instances
where the carrying amount of the asset group exceeded the undiscounted cash flows, the fair value
of the asset group would be determined and an impairment loss would be recognized based on the
amount by which the carrying value of the asset group exceeds its fair value. Determining asset
groups and underlying cash flows requires the use of significant judgments and estimates.
Goodwill & Indefinite Life Intangible Assets
Goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets recognized in connection with business acquisitions
are not amortized to expense. Indefinite life intangible assets primarily consist of trademarks.
Goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets are tested annually for impairment. Further,
goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate there may be a possible permanent loss of value. Eaton completed
annual impairment tests for goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets as of July 1 of each
year presented using discounted cash flow and other valuation techniques. These tests confirmed
that the fair value of Eatons reporting units and indefinite life intangible assets exceed their
respective carrying values and that no impairment loss was required to be recognized in 2009 or for
any prior periods.
Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level, which is equivalent to Eatons
operating segments, and is based on the net assets for each segment, including goodwill and
intangible assets. Goodwill is assigned to each operating segment as this represents the lowest
level that constitutes a business and for which discrete financial information is available and
segment management regularly reviews the operating results. A discounted cash flow model is used
to estimate the fair value of each operating segment, which considers forecasted cash flows
discounted at an estimated weighted-average cost of capital. The Company selected the discounted
cash flow methodology as it believes that it is comparable to what would be used by other market
participants. The forecasted cash flows are based on the Companys long-term operating plan, and a
terminal value is used to estimate the operating segment cash flows beyond the period covered by
the operating plan. The weighted-average cost of capital is an estimate of the overall after-tax
rate of return required by equity and debt market participants of a business enterprise. These
analyses require the exercise of significant judgments, including judgments about appropriate
discount rates, perpetual growth rates and the timing of expected future cash flows. Discount rate
assumptions are based on an assessment of the risk inherent in the future cash flows of the
respective operating segment. Sensitivity analyses were performed around these assumptions in
order to assess the reasonableness of the assumptions and the resulting estimated fair values.
Derivative Financial Instruments
In the normal course of business, Eaton is exposed to certain risks related to fluctuations in
interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. The Company uses various
derivative and non-derivative financial instruments, primarily interest rate swaps, foreign
currency forward exchange contracts, foreign currency swaps and, to a lesser extent, commodity
contracts, to manage risks from these market fluctuations. The derivative financial instruments
used by Eaton are straightforward, non-leveraged instruments. The counterparties to these financial
instruments are financial institutions with strong credit ratings. Eaton maintains control over the
size of positions entered into with any one counterparty and regularly monitors the credit rating
of these institutions. Such derivative financial instruments are not purchased and sold for
trading purposes.
Derivative financial instruments are measured at fair value and recognized as assets or liabilities
in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Accounting for the gain or loss resulting from the change in the
fair value of the derivative financial instrument depends on whether it has been designated, and is
effective, as part of a hedging relationship and, if so, on the nature of the hedging activity.
Eaton formally documents all relationships between derivative financial instruments accounted for
as hedges and the hedged item, as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for
undertaking the hedge transaction. This process includes linking all derivative financial
instruments to a recognized asset or liability, specific firm commitment, forecasted transaction,
or net investment in a foreign operation. These financial instruments can be designated as:
Page 25
|
|
|
Hedges of the change in the fair value of a recognized fixed-rate asset or liability,
or the firm commitment to acquire such an asset or liability (a fair value hedge). For
these hedges, the gain or loss from the derivative financial instrument, as well as the
offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk, are recognized
in income during the period of change in fair value. |
|
|
|
|
Hedges of the variable cash flows of a recognized variable-rate asset or liability, or
the forecasted acquisition of such an asset or liability (a cash flow hedge). For these
hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss from the derivative financial instrument
is recognized in Eaton shareholders equity and reclassified to income in the same period
when the gain or loss on the hedged item is included in income. |
|
|
|
|
Hedges of the foreign currency exposure related to a net investment in a foreign
operation (a net investment hedge). For these hedges, the effective portion of the gain
or loss from the derivative financial instrument is recognized in Eaton shareholders
equity and reclassified to income in the same period when the gain or loss related to the
net investment in the foreign operation is included in income. |
The gain or loss from a derivative financial instrument designated as a hedge that is effective as
a hedge is included in the same line of the Statement of Consolidated Income as the offsetting loss
or gain on the hedged item.
The change in fair value of a derivative financial instrument that is not effective as a hedge is
immediately recognized in income.
For derivatives that are not designated as a hedge, any gain or loss is immediately recognized in
income. The majority of derivatives used in this manner relate to risks resulting from assets or
liabilities denominated in a foreign currency that arise in the normal course of business.
Warranty Expenses
Estimated product warranty expenses are accrued in Cost of products sold at the time the related
sale is recognized. Estimates of warranty expenses are based primarily on historical warranty claim
experience and specific customer contracts. Warranty expenses include accruals for basic warranties
for products sold, as well as accruals for product recalls and other related events when they are
known and estimable.
Asset Retirement Obligations
A conditional asset retirement obligation is recognized at fair value when incurred, if the fair
value of the liability can be reasonably estimated. Uncertainty about the timing or method of
settlement of a conditional asset retirement obligation would be considered in the measurement of
the liability when sufficient information exists. Eaton believes that for substantially all of its
asset retirement obligations, there is an indeterminate settlement date because the range of time
over which the Company may settle the obligation is unknown or cannot be estimated. A liability for
these obligations will be recognized in the period when sufficient information regarding timing and
method of settlement becomes available to make a reasonable estimate of the liabilitys fair value.
Estimates
Preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions in certain circumstances
that affect amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes.
Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Financial Presentation Changes
Certain amounts for prior years have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Page 26
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS NOT YET ADOPTED
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
In 2009, the FASB issued a revised standard for accounting and disclosure related to the
consolidation of variable interest entities. The standard will require enterprises involved with
these types of entities to provide more information about these entities in their financial
statements. The standard is effective for Eaton in 2010. The Company expects the adoption of this
standard will not have a material effect on Eatons financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
Revenue
Recognition for Multiple-Deliverable Arrangements
In 2009, the FASB issued a revised standard for accounting and disclosures of revenues related to
arrangements with customers to provide multiple products and services at different points in time
or over different time periods. This standard is effective for Eaton in 2011. The Company expects
the adoption of this standard will not have a material effect on Eatons financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
ACQUISITIONS OF BUSINESSES
Eaton acquired certain businesses and entered into joint ventures in separate transactions for
combined net cash purchase prices of $10 in 2009, $2,807 in 2008, and $1,433 in 2007. The
Statements of Consolidated Income include the results of these businesses from the dates of
acquisition or formation. A summary of these transactions follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of |
|
Business |
|
|
Acquired business |
|
acquisition |
|
segment |
|
Annual sales |
|
Micro Innovation Holding AG |
|
September 1, |
|
Electrical |
|
$33 for 2008 |
A Switzerland-based manufacturer of human |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Rest of |
|
|
|
|
machine interfaces, programmable logic |
|
|
|
|
|
World |
|
|
|
|
controllers and input/output devices.
Eaton acquired the remaining shares to increase
its ownership from 50% to 100%. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEG Middle East Power Solutions & Switchboard |
|
July 2, |
|
Electrical |
|
$10 for 2008 |
Manufacture LLC |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Rest of |
|
|
|
|
A 49%-owned joint venture to manufacture low |
|
|
|
|
|
World |
|
|
|
|
voltage switchboards and control panel
assemblies for use in the Middle East power
generation and industrial markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integ Holding Limited |
|
October 2, |
|
Hydraulics |
|
$52 for 2007 |
The parent company of Integrated Hydraulics |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ltd., a U.K.-based manufacturer of screw-in
cartridge valves, custom-engineered hydraulic
valves and manifold systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nittan Global Tech Co. Ltd. |
|
Operational |
|
Automotive |
|
Joint |
A 49%-owned joint venture to manage the global |
|
October 1, |
|
|
|
|
|
Venture |
design, manufacture and supply of engine valves |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and valve actuation products to Japanese and
Korean automobile and engine manufacturers.
In addition, during the second half of 2008,
several related manufacturing joint ventures
were established. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engine Valves Business of Kirloskar Oil Engines Ltd. |
|
July 31, 2008 |
|
Automotive |
|
$5 for 2007 |
An India-based designer, manufacturer and
distributor of intake and exhaust valves for diesel
and gasoline engines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PK Electronics |
|
July 31, 2008 |
|
Electrical |
|
$9 for 2007 |
A Belgium-based distributor and service provider |
|
|
|
|
|
Rest of |
|
|
|
|
of single phase and three-phase uninterruptible |
|
|
|
|
|
World |
|
|
|
|
power supply (UPS) systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Moeller Group |
|
April 4, 2008 |
|
Electrical |
|
1.02 billion for |
A Germany-based supplier of electrical |
|
|
|
|
|
Rest of |
|
|
2007 |
|
components for commercial and residential |
|
|
|
|
|
World |
|
|
|
|
building applications and industrial controls for
industrial equipment applications |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balmen Electronic, S.L. |
|
March 31, |
|
Electrical |
|
$6 for 2007 |
A Spain-based distributor and service provider |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Rest of |
|
|
|
|
of uninterruptible power supply (UPS) systems |
|
|
|
|
|
World |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phoenixtec Power Company Ltd. |
|
February 26, |
|
Electrical |
|
$515 for 2007 |
A Taiwan-based manufacturer of single and |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Rest of |
|
|
|
|
three-phase uninterruptible power supply (UPS) |
|
|
|
|
|
World |
|
|
|
|
systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arrow Hose & Tubing Inc. |
|
November 8, |
|
Hydraulics |
|
$12 for 2006 |
A Canada-based manufacturer of thermoplastic |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hose and tubing for the industrial, food and
beverage, and agricultural markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MGE small systems UPS business from |
|
October 31, |
|
Electrical |
|
$245 for 2007 |
Schneider Electric |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Rest of |
|
|
|
|
A France-based global provider of power quality |
|
|
|
|
|
World |
|
|
|
|
solutions including uninterruptible power supply
(UPS) systems, power distribution units, static
transfer switches and surge suppressors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Babco Electric Group |
|
October 19, |
|
Electrical |
|
$11 for 2007 |
A Canada-based manufacturer of specialty low- |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Americas |
|
|
|
|
and medium-voltage switchgear and electrical
housings for use in the Canadian oil and gas
industry and other harsh environments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pulizzi Engineering |
|
June 19, 2007 |
|
Electrical |
|
$12 for 2006 |
A U.S. manufacturer of alternating current (AC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Americas |
|
|
|
|
power distribution, AC power sequencing,
redundant power and remote-reboot power
management systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology and related assets of SMC Electrical |
|
May 18, 2007 |
|
Electrical |
|
None |
Products, Inc.s industrial medium-voltage adjustable |
|
|
|
|
|
Americas |
|
|
|
|
frequency drive business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel components division of Saturn Electronics & |
|
May 2, 2007 |
|
Automotive |
|
$28 for 2006 |
Engineering, Inc.
A U.S. designer and manufacturer of fuel
containment and shutoff valves, emissions control
valves and specialty actuators |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aphel Technologies Limited |
|
April 5, 2007 |
|
Electrical |
|
$12 for 2006 |
A U.K.-based global supplier of high density, |
|
|
|
|
|
Rest of |
|
|
|
|
fault-tolerant power distribution solutions for |
|
|
|
|
|
World |
|
|
|
|
datacenters, technical offices, laboratories and
retail environments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Argo-Tech Corporation |
|
March 16, |
|
Aerospace |
|
$206 for 2006 |
A U.S.-based manufacturer of high-performance |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aerospace engine fuel pumps and systems,
airframe fuel pumps and systems, and ground
fueling systems for commercial and military
aerospace markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Power Protection Business of Power Products Ltd. |
|
February 7, |
|
Electrical |
|
$3 for 2006 |
A Czech Republic distributor and service provider |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Rest of |
|
|
|
|
of Powerware® products and other uninterruptible |
|
|
|
|
|
World |
|
|
|
|
power supply (UPS) systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As described above, in 2008 Eaton acquired The Moeller Group electrical business and the Phoenixtec
electrical business for combined cash purchase prices of $2,696. In 2008, the assets and
liabilities for these businesses were recognized at estimated fair values as determined by Eatons
management based on available information and on assumptions as to future operations. As completed
in 2009, the final allocations of the purchase prices, which did not differ materially from the
preliminary estimates, are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
759 |
|
Property, plant & equipment |
|
|
432 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,710 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
1,071 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
|
4,076 |
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
|
1,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
2,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets of $1,071 included $638 of customer relationships having a useful life of
15 years, $251 related to trademarks having a useful life of 15 to 20 years, and $182 of technology
having a useful life of 3 to 13 years. Goodwill of $1,319 for Moeller and $391 for Phoenixtec are
non-deductible for income tax purposes.
As described above, in 2007 Eaton acquired the Argo-Tech aerospace business and the MGE small
systems UPS electrical business for combined cash purchase prices of $1,346. In 2007, the assets
and liabilities for these businesses were recognized at estimated fair values as determined by
Eatons management based on available information and on assumptions as to future operations. As
completed in 2008, the final allocations of the purchase prices, which did not differ materially
from preliminary estimates, are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
223 |
|
Property, plant & equipment |
|
|
23 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
899 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
|
1,727 |
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
1,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets of $582 included $42 related to trademarks not subject to amortization,
$436 of customer relationships having a useful life of 5 to 25 years, and $104 of technology having
a useful life of 5 to 25 years. Goodwill of $420 for Argo-Tech and $479 for the MGE small systems
UPS electrical business are non-deductible for income tax purposes.
Restructuring Liabilities
For acquisitions completed prior to 2009, Eaton has undertaken restructuring activities at acquired
businesses, including workforce reductions, plant consolidations, and facility closures. Liabilities
for these restructuring activities were recognized in the allocation of the purchase price related
to the acquired business. A summary of these liabilities, and utilization of the various
components, follows:
Page 29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce reductions |
|
|
closing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
& other |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at January 1, 2007 |
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
Liabilities recognized |
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Utilized |
|
|
(699 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Liabilities recognized |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Utilized |
|
|
(428 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Liabilities recognized |
|
|
1,081 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Utilized |
|
|
(1,035 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
329 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACQUISITION INTEGRATION, WORKFORCE REDUCTION & PLANT CLOSING CHARGES
Acquisition Integration Charges
In 2009, 2008 and 2007, Eaton incurred charges related to the integration of acquired businesses.
These charges, which consisted of plant consolidations and integration, were recognized as expense
as incurred. A summary of these charges follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
Electrical Americas |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Rest of World |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
Hydraulics |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Aerospace |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Automotive |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax charges |
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After-tax charges |
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
Per common share |
|
$ |
.32 |
|
|
$ |
.31 |
|
|
$ |
.28 |
|
Charges in 2009 were related primarily to the integration of the following acquisitions: Integrated
Hydraulics, Kirloskar, Moeller, Phoenixtec and Argo-Tech. Charges in 2008 were related primarily
to the integration of the following acquisitions: Kirloskar, Moeller, Phoenixtec, the MGE small
systems UPS business, Saturn, Argo-Tech, Ronningen-Petter, Synflex, PerkinElmer and Cobham.
Charges in 2007 were related primarily to the integration of the following acquisitions: the MGE
small systems UPS business, Saturn, Argo-Tech, Schreder-Hazemeyer, Senyuan, Synflex, PerkinElmer,
Cobham, Powerware, Hayward and Walterscheid.
Workforce Reduction Charges
Eaton took significant actions in 2009 to reduce its workforce in response to the severe economic
downturn. The reductions total approximately 17% of the full-time workforce. These actions resulted
in the recognition of severance and pension and other postretirement benefits expense of $182 in
2009.
Plant Closing Charges
In 2008, charges of $27 were recognized related to the closure of the automotive engine valve
lifters manufacturing plant in Massa, Italy. These charges, consisting of $17 for severance, $7 for
the write-down of assets and $3 for other costs, reduced operating profit of the Automotive
segment.
Summary of Acquisition Integration, Workforce Reduction & Plant Closing Liabilities
A summary of acquisition integration charges, workforce reduction charges and plant closing
charges, and remaining liabilities, follows:
Page 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce reductions |
|
|
closing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
& other |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at January 1, 2007 |
|
|
1,603 |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
Liabilities recognized |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Utilized |
|
|
(1,044 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Liabilities recognized |
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
Utilized |
|
|
(451 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Liabilities recognized |
|
|
12,073 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
Utilized |
|
|
(11,189 |
) |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These charges were included in the Statements of Consolidated Income in Cost of products sold or
Selling & administrative expense, as appropriate. In Business Segment Information, the charges
reduced Operating profit of the related business segment.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
In 2007, Eaton sold the Mirror Controls Division of the Automotive segment for $111, resulting in a
$20 after-tax gain, or $.12 per common share. The gain on sale of the Mirror Controls Division, and
other results of this business, are reported as Discontinued operations in the Statements of
Consolidated Income.
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS
Eaton invests excess cash generated from operations in short-term marketable investments and
classifies these investments as available-for-sale. These investments are recognized at fair
value, with the unrealized gain or loss recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
in Eaton shareholders equity. A summary of the carrying value of short-term investments follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Time deposits & certificate of deposits with banks |
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
$ |
237 |
|
Bonds issued by foreign governments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Other |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments |
|
$ |
433 |
|
|
$ |
342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GOODWILL & OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
A summary of goodwill follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Electrical Americas |
|
$ |
2,003 |
|
|
$ |
1,890 |
|
Electrical Rest of World |
|
|
1,005 |
|
|
|
948 |
|
Hydraulics |
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
1,002 |
|
Aerospace |
|
|
1,047 |
|
|
|
1,037 |
|
Truck |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
Automotive |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total goodwill |
|
$ |
5,435 |
|
|
$ |
5,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in goodwill in 2009 was due to goodwill for businesses acquired during 2009, the
finalization of purchase price allocations related to businesses acquired in 2008, and foreign
currency translation. These transactions are described in the Acquisitions of Businesses Note
above.
In 2009, the Electrical segment was divided into Electrical Americas and Electrical Rest of World.
Goodwill was allocated to these segments based on the relative fair values of each segment.
A summary of other intangible assets follows:
Page 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Historical |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Historical |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
amortization |
|
|
cost |
|
|
amortization |
|
Intangible assets not subject to amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(primarily trademarks) |
|
$ |
451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
1,181 |
|
|
$ |
204 |
|
|
$ |
1,327 |
|
|
$ |
144 |
|
Patents and technology |
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
Other |
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other intangible assets |
|
$ |
2,543 |
|
|
$ |
553 |
|
|
$ |
2,389 |
|
|
$ |
396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense related to intangible assets subject to amortization was $153 in 2009. Expense for
intangible assets subject to amortization for each of the next five years is $156 in 2010, $148 in
2011, $149 in 2012, $141 in 2013, and $135 in 2014.
DEBT & OTHER FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Short-term debt of $113 at December 31, 2009 included $75 of short-term commercial paper in the
United States which had a weighted-average interest rate of 0.4%, $13 of other short-term debt in
the United States, and $25 of short-term debt outside the United States. Borrowings outside the
United States are generally denominated in local currencies. Operations outside the United States
have available short-term lines of credit of approximately $680 from various banks worldwide.
A summary of long-term debt, including the current portion, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
7.40% notes due 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
Floating rate senior notes due 2009
(2.88% at December 31, 2008 - LIBOR+0.08%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
Floating rate senior note due 2010
(2.44% at December 31, 2008 - LIBOR+0.25%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
281 |
|
5.75% notes due 2012 |
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
7.58% notes due 2012 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
4.9% notes due 2013
($200 converted to floating rate by interest rate swap) |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
5.80% notes due 2013 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
5.95% notes due 2014
($100 converted to floating rate by interest rate swap) |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
12.5% U.K. pound sterling debentures due 2014 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
4.65% notes due 2015 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
5.3% notes due 2017 |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
6.875% to 7.09% notes due 2018 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
5.6% notes due 2018
($275 converted to floating rate by interest rate swap) |
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
4.215% Japanese Yen notes due 2018 |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
6.95% notes due 2019 |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
8-7/8% debentures due 2019
($25 converted to floating rate by interest rate swap) |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
8.10% debentures due 2022 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
7.625% debentures due 2024
($25 converted to floating rate by interest rate swap) |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
6-1/2% debentures due 2025 |
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
7.875% debentures due 2026 |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
7.65% debentures due 2029
($50 converted to floating rate by interest rate swap) |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
5.45% debentures due 2034
($25 converted to floating rate by interest rate swap) |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
5.25% notes due 2035 |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
5.8% notes due 2037 |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
Other |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
|
3,354 |
|
|
|
3,459 |
|
Page 32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt less current portion |
|
$ |
3,349 |
|
|
$ |
3,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eatons United States long-term revolving credit facilities with banks total $1.5 billion, of which
$500 expires in each year from 2011 through 2013. These facilities support Eatons commercial paper
borrowings. There were no borrowings outstanding under these revolving credit facilities at
December 31, 2009.
Mandatory maturities of long-term debt for each of the next five years are $5 in 2010, related
principally to capitalized leases, $0 in 2011, $312 in 2012, $307 in 2013, and $259 in 2014.
Interest paid on debt follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Interest paid |
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
206 |
|
|
$ |
204 |
|
Eaton has entered into fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk. These
interest rate swaps are accounted for as fair value hedges of certain long-term debt. The maturity
of the swap corresponds with the maturity of the debt instrument as noted in the table of long-term
debt above. A summary of interest rate swaps outstanding at December 31, 2009, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rates at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
Fixed |
|
Floating |
|
|
|
|
interest |
|
interest |
|
|
Notional |
|
rate |
|
rate |
|
Basis for contracted |
Amount |
|
received |
|
paid |
|
floating interest rate paid |
$200 |
|
|
4.90 |
% |
|
|
2.67 |
% |
|
6 month LIBOR+2.15% |
$100 |
|
|
5.95 |
% |
|
|
3.28 |
% |
|
6 month LIBOR+2.60% |
$275 |
|
|
5.60 |
% |
|
|
1.74 |
% |
|
6 month LIBOR+1.22% |
$ 25 |
|
|
8.88 |
% |
|
|
4.30 |
% |
|
6 month LIBOR+3.84% |
$ 25 |
|
|
7.63 |
% |
|
|
3.11 |
% |
|
6 month LIBOR+2.48% |
$ 50 |
|
|
7.65 |
% |
|
|
3.09 |
% |
|
6 month LIBOR+2.57% |
$ 25 |
|
|
5.45 |
% |
|
|
0.87 |
% |
|
6 month LIBOR+0.28% |
RETIREMENT BENEFITS PLANS
Adoption of Measurement Provisions of the Compensation Retirement Benefits Standard
In 2008, Eaton adopted the revised measurement date provisions of the Compensation Retirement
Benefits Standard, which requires measurement of the funded status of all pension and other
postretirement benefits plans to be as of the date of the year-end financial statements.
Previously, the measurement date for Eatons pension and other postretirement benefits plans was
November 30. As a result of the change in measurement dates, in the fourth quarter of 2008, Eaton
recognized a charge to retained earnings of $19 for one month of costs ($11 after-tax) related to
pension benefits and other postretirement benefits with no corresponding adjustment to net income.
Retirement Benefits Plan Liabilities & Assets
Eaton has defined benefits pension plans and other postretirement benefits plans. Components of
plan obligations and assets, and recognized liabilities and assets, follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other postretirement |
|
|
|
Pension liabilities |
|
|
liabilities |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Changes in benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
(3,288 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,092 |
) |
|
$ |
(779 |
) |
|
$ |
(859 |
) |
Service cost |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
Interest cost |
|
|
(203 |
) |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
Actuarial (loss) gain |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
58 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
Business acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
|
(3,610 |
) |
|
|
(3,288 |
) |
|
|
(830 |
) |
|
|
(779 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other postretirement |
|
|
|
Pension liabilities |
|
|
liabilities |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Change in plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
|
1,674 |
|
|
|
2,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
(641 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contributions |
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
(318 |
) |
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
(87 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
|
2,042 |
|
|
|
1,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet |
|
$ |
(1,568 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,614 |
) |
|
$ |
(830 |
) |
|
$ |
(779 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other postretirement |
|
|
|
Pension liabilities |
|
|
liabilities |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Non-current assets |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
$ |
(76 |
) |
|
$ |
(76 |
) |
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
(1,586 |
) |
|
|
(1,650 |
) |
|
|
(754 |
) |
|
|
(703 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(1,568 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,614 |
) |
|
$ |
(830 |
) |
|
$ |
(779 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive loss follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other postretirement |
|
|
|
Pension liabilities |
|
|
liabilities |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net actuarial loss |
|
$ |
1,363 |
|
|
$ |
1,410 |
|
|
$ |
228 |
|
|
$ |
159 |
|
Prior service cost (credit) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,370 |
|
|
$ |
1,413 |
|
|
$ |
216 |
|
|
$ |
146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in pension and other postretirement benefits liabilities recognized in Accumulated other
comprehensive loss in Eaton shareholders equity follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other postretirement |
|
|
|
Pension liabilities |
|
|
liabilities |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
1,413 |
|
|
$ |
767 |
|
|
$ |
146 |
|
|
$ |
226 |
|
Prior service cost arising during the year |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Net loss (gain) arising during the year |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
772 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Less amounts included in costs during the year |
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change for the year |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
1,370 |
|
|
$ |
1,413 |
|
|
$ |
216 |
|
|
$ |
146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Plans
Assumptions used to determine pension benefit obligations and costs follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
non-United States |
|
|
United States plans |
|
plans (weighted-average) |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Assumptions used to
determine benefit
obligation at year-end |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
6.30 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
5.85 |
% |
|
|
6.29 |
% |
|
|
5.96 |
% |
Rate of compensation
increase |
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
|
3.68 |
% |
Page 34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
non-United States |
|
|
United States plans |
|
plans (weighted-average) |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Assumptions used to
determine cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate |
|
|
6.30 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
5.60 |
% |
|
|
6.29 |
% |
|
|
5.96 |
% |
|
|
5.39 |
% |
Expected long-term
return on plan assets |
|
|
8.95 |
% |
|
|
8.95 |
% |
|
|
8.75 |
% |
|
|
8.18 |
% |
|
|
8.44 |
% |
|
|
8.31 |
% |
Rate of compensation
increase |
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
|
3.68 |
% |
|
|
3.67 |
% |
The expected long-term rate of return on pension assets was determined separately for each country
and reflects long-term historical data taking into account each plans target asset allocation.
The components of pension benefit cost recognized in the Statements of Consolidated Income follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
(110 |
) |
|
$ |
(137 |
) |
|
$ |
(147 |
) |
Interest cost |
|
|
(203 |
) |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(163 |
) |
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(205 |
) |
Curtailment loss |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Settlement loss |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost |
|
$ |
(270 |
) |
|
$ |
(214 |
) |
|
$ |
(247 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to limitations imposed by the Pension Protection Act on pension lump sum distributions, Eatons
U.S. Qualified Pension Plan became restricted in 2009 from making 100% lump sum payments. As a
result, the plan experienced a significant increase in lump sum payments before the limitation went
into effect. Total pension settlement expense was $86 in 2009, of which $83 was attributable to
the U.S. pension plans. A portion of the increase was attributable to the workforce reduction in
2009. These charges were primarily included in the Statements of Consolidated Income in Cost of
products sold or Selling & administrative expense, as appropriate. In Business Segment Information,
the charges were included in Pension & other postretirement benefits expense.
As a result of the workforce reduction in 2009, curtailment expense of $22 related to pension plans
was recognized in 2009. The curtailment expense included recognition of the change in the projected
benefit obligation, as well as recognition of a portion of the unrecognized prior service cost.
These charges were primarily included in the Statements of Consolidated Income in Cost of products
sold or Selling & administrative expense, as appropriate. In Business Segment Information, the
charges were included in Pension & other postretirement benefits expense.
The estimated net loss and prior service cost for the defined benefit pension plans that will be
recognized from Accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit cost in 2010 are $80
and $1, respectively.
The total accumulated benefit obligation for all pension plans at December 31, 2009 was $3,404 and
at December 31, 2008 was $3,083. The components of pension plans with an accumulated benefit
obligation in excess of plan assets at December 31 follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Projected benefit obligation |
|
$ |
3,390 |
|
|
$ |
2,819 |
|
Accumulated benefit obligation |
|
|
3,217 |
|
|
|
2,663 |
|
Fair value of plan assets |
|
|
1,792 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
United States pension plans represent 62% and 65% of benefit obligations at December 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively.
Contributions to pension plans that Eaton expects to make in 2010, and made in 2009, 2008 and 2007,
follow:
Page 35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
United States |
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
$ |
177 |
|
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
$ |
150 |
|
Other |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contributions |
|
$ |
402 |
|
|
$ |
271 |
|
|
$ |
210 |
|
|
$ |
220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In January 2010, Eaton contributed $300 to the U.S. Pension Plan as described in the table above.
Pension benefit payments in 2009, and assumed pension benefit payments for each of the next five
years, and the five years thereafter in the aggregate, were $318 in 2009, $171 in 2010, $178 in
2011, $181 in 2012, $409 in 2013, $250 in 2014 and $1,428 in 2015 - 2019. Pension lump sum
payments in 2010, 2011 and 2012 are restricted to 50% due to limitations imposed by the Pension
Protection Act.
The
Company has various defined contribution benefit plans, primarily consisting of the Eaton
Savings Plan in the United States. The total contributions related to these plans are charged to
expense and were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Contributions |
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
Disclosures about Pension Plan Assets
Financial instruments included in pension plan assets are categorized into a fair value hierarchy
of three levels, based on the degree of subjectivity inherent in the valuation methodology as
follows:
|
|
Level 1 - Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets in active markets. |
|
|
Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar assets in active markets, and inputs that are
observable for the asset, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of
the financial instrument. |
|
|
Level 3 - Unobservable prices or inputs. |
A summary of the fair value of pension plan assets at December 31, 2009, and the fair value
measurement used, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Registered investment companies |
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
Common collective trusts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
U.S. equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
646 |
|
Non-U.S. equity & global equities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
839 |
|
Fixed income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296 |
|
Long duration funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
U.S. Treasuries |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
Other fixed income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
Cash equivalents |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
Other |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pension plan assets |
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
1,943 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
2,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for pension plan assets measured at
fair value. There have been no changes in the methodologies used at December 31, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
Registered investment companies - Valued at the closing price of the exchange traded funds
shares. |
|
|
Common collective trusts - Valued at the net unit value of units held by the trust at year
end. The unit value is determined by the total value of fund assets divided by the total
number of units of the fund owned. The equity investments in collective trusts are
predominantly in index funds for which the underlying securities are actively traded in public
markets based upon readily measurable prices. |
|
|
U.S. Treasuries - Valued at the closing price of each security. |
Page 36
|
|
Other fixed income - Asset backed securities, agencies and variable rate bonds valued based
on pricing models which incorporate information from market sources and observed market
movements. |
|
|
Cash equivalents - Primarily certificates of deposit, commercial paper and repurchase
agreements. |
|
|
Other - Primarily insurance contracts for international plans and also futures contracts
and over the counter options. These investments are valued based on the closing prices of
future contracts or indices as available on the Bloomberg or similar service, and private
equity investments. |
The weighted-average pension plan asset allocations by asset category at December 31, 2009 and 2008
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Equity securities |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
Debt securities |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
Other |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment policies and strategies are developed on a country specific basis. The U.S. plans,
representing 59% of worldwide pension assets, and the U.K. plans representing 33% of worldwide
pension assets, are invested primarily for growth, as they are open plans with active participants
and ongoing accruals. In general, the plans have their primary allocation to diversified, global
equities, primarily through index funds in the form of common collective trusts. The U.S. plans
target allocation is 37.5% U.S. equities, 37.5% non-U.S. equities and 25% debt securities and
other, including cash equivalents. The U.K. plans target asset allocations are 64% equities and
the remainder in debt securities. The equity risk for the plans is managed through broad
geographical diversification and diversification across industries and levels of market
capitalization. The majority of debt allocations for these plans are longer duration government
(including inflation protected securities) and corporate debt. The U.S. pension plan is authorized
to use derivatives to achieve more economically desired market exposures and to use futures, swaps
and options to gain or hedge exposures. In 2009, the U.S. pension fund purchased put spreads on
the S&P 500 to manage the downside risk of a portion of its domestic equity exposure. One U.K.
plan uses long duration funds to more closely manage the interest rate risk of the liabilities.
Other Postretirement Benefits Plans
Assumptions used to determine other postretirement benefit obligations and cost follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Assumptions used to determine benefit obligation
at year-end |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate |
|
|
5.70 |
% |
|
|
6.30 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year |
|
|
8.30 |
% |
|
|
8.25 |
% |
|
|
8.30 |
% |
Ultimate health care cost trend rate |
|
|
4.75 |
% |
|
|
4.75 |
% |
|
|
4.75 |
% |
Year ultimate health care cost trend rate is achieved |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions used to determine cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate |
|
|
6.30 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
5.60 |
% |
Initial health care cost trend rate |
|
|
8.25 |
% |
|
|
8.30 |
% |
|
|
8.80 |
% |
Ultimate health care cost trend rate |
|
|
4.75 |
% |
|
|
4.75 |
% |
|
|
4.75 |
% |
Year ultimate health care cost trend rate is achieved |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
The components of other postretirement benefits cost recognized in the Statements of
Consolidated Income follow:
Page 37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
Interest cost |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
Amortization |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
Curtailment loss |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs |
|
$ |
(66 |
) |
|
$ |
(75 |
) |
|
$ |
(73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated net loss and prior service cost (credit) for other postretirement benefits plans that
will be recognized from Accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefits cost in
2010 are $11 and $(2), respectively.
Assumed health care cost trend rates may have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the
health care plans. A 1-percentage point change in the assumed health care cost trend rates would
have the following effects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1% Increase |
|
1% Decrease |
Effect on total service and
interest cost |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
Effect on other postretirement
liabilities |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
At December 31, 2009, expected other postretirement benefit payments for each of the next five
years and the five years thereafter in the aggregate are $87 in 2010, $86 in 2011, $84 in 2012, $82
in 2013, $81 in 2014 and $370 in 2015-2019. The expected subsidy receipts related to the Medicare
Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, which would reduce the other
postretirement benefit payments listed above for each of the next five years and the five years
thereafter in the aggregate are, $8 in 2010 and 2011, $9 in 2012, 2013 and 2014, and $45 in
2015-2019.
PROTECTION
OF THE ENVIRONMENT & SUSTAINABILITY
Eaton has established policies to ensure that its operations are conducted in keeping with good
corporate citizenship and with a positive commitment to the protection of the natural and workplace
environments. For example, each manufacturing facility has a person responsible for environmental,
health and safety (EHS) matters. All of the Companys manufacturing facilities are required to be
certified to ISO 14001, an international standard for environmental management systems. The Company
routinely reviews EHS performance at each of its facilities and continuously strives to improve
pollution prevention at its facilities.
As a result of past operations, Eaton is involved in remedial response and voluntary environmental
remediation at a number of sites, including certain of its currently-owned or formerly-owned
plants. The Company has also been named a potentially responsible party (PRP) under the Federal
Superfund law at a number of waste disposal sites.
A number of factors affect the cost of environmental remediation, including the number of parties
involved at a particular site, the determination of the extent of contamination, the length of time
the remediation may require, the complexity of environmental regulations, and the continuing
advancement of remediation technology. Taking these factors into account, Eaton has estimated the
costs of remediation, which will be incurred over a period of years. The Company accrues an amount
on an undiscounted basis, consistent with the estimates of these costs when it is probable that a
liability has been incurred. The Consolidated Balance Sheet included a liability for these costs of
$80 at December 31, 2009 and $85 at December 31, 2008.
Based upon Eatons analysis and subject to the difficulty in estimating these future costs, the
Company expects that any sum it may be required to pay in connection with environmental matters is
not reasonably likely to exceed the liability by an amount that would have a material adverse
effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows. All of these estimates are
forward-looking statements and, given the inherent uncertainties in evaluating environmental
exposures, actual results can differ from these estimates.
Page 38
CONTINGENCIES
Eaton is subject to a broad range of claims, administrative proceedings, and legal proceedings,
such as lawsuits that relate to contractual allegations, patent infringement, personal injuries
(including asbestos claims) antitrust matters and employment-related matters. Although it is not possible to
predict with certainty the outcome or cost of these matters, the Company believes that these
matters will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
MERITOR LITIGATION
On October 5, 2006, ZF Meritor LLC and Meritor Transmission Corporation (collectively, Meritor)
filed an action against Eaton in the U.S. District Court for Delaware. The action seeks damages,
which would be trebled under U.S. antitrust laws, as well as injunctive relief and costs. The suit
alleged that Eaton engaged in anti-competitive conduct against Meritor in the sale of heavy-duty
truck transmissions in North America. Following a four week trial on liability only, on October 8,
2009, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Meritor. Eaton firmly believes that it competes
fairly and honestly for business in the marketplace, and that at no time did it act in an
anti-competitive manner. During an earlier stage in the case, the judge concluded that damage
estimates contained in a report filed by Meritor were not based on reliable data and the report was
specifically excluded from the case. On November 3, 2009, Eaton filed a motion for judgment as a
matter of law and to set aside the verdict. That motion is currently pending. Accordingly, an
estimate of any potential loss related to this action cannot be made at this time.
EATON SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
There are 500 million common shares authorized ($.50 par value per share), 166.2 million of which
were issued and outstanding at year-end 2009. At December 31, 2009, there were 8,452 holders of
record of common shares. Additionally, 17,960 current and former employees were shareholders
through participation in the Eaton Savings Plan (ESP), Eaton Personal Investment Plan (EPIP) and
Eaton Electrical de Puerto Rico Inc. Retirement Savings Plan.
In 2008, Eaton sold 18.678 million of its common shares in a public offering, resulting in net cash
proceeds of $1.522 billion. The cash proceeds from the sale of the common shares were used to repay
borrowings incurred to fund the acquisitions of Moeller and Phoenixtec, and to repay commercial
paper issued under the backstop provided by a $3.0 billion revolving credit agreement that Eaton
terminated in May 2008.
Eaton has a common share repurchase plan that authorizes the repurchase of 10 million common
shares. The shares are expected to be repurchased over time, depending on market conditions, the
market price of the Companys common shares, the Companys capital levels and other considerations.
The number of common shares repurchased in the open market and total cost, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Shares repurchased in millions |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1.420 |
|
|
|
4.092 |
|
Cost |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
The number of stock options exercised and the resulting cash proceeds follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Stock options exercised in millions |
|
|
.844 |
|
|
|
1.240 |
|
|
|
3.713 |
|
Cash proceeds |
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
Eaton has plans that permit certain employees and directors to defer a portion of their
compensation. A trust contains $22 of common shares and marketable securities, as valued at
December 31, 2009, to fund a portion of these liabilities. The marketable securities were included
in Other assets and the common shares were included in Eaton shareholders equity at historical
cost.
Stock Options
Under various plans, stock options have been granted to certain employees and directors to
purchase common shares at prices equal to fair market value on the date of grant. Substantially all
of these options vest ratably during the three-year period
following the date of grant and expire 10 years from the date of grant. Compensation expense is
recognized for stock options based on the fair value of
the options at the date of grant. Expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the period
the employee or director is required to provide service in exchange for the award.
Page 39
The fair value of stock options granted was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
A summary of the assumptions used in determining the fair value of options follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Expected volatility |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
27% to 22 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
Expected option life in years |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
1.7% to 2.2 |
% |
|
|
3.6% to 1.7 |
% |
|
|
4.0% to 4.9 |
% |
Weighted-average fair value
of stock options granted |
|
$ |
10.27 |
|
|
$ |
16.59 |
|
|
$ |
17.79 |
|
Application of the Black-Scholes option pricing model involves assumptions that are judgmental and
affect compensation expense. Historical information was the primary basis for the selection of
expected volatility, expected option life, and expected dividend yield. Expected volatility was
based on the most recent historical period equal to the expected life of the option. The risk-free
interest rate was based on yields of U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a term equal to the
expected life of the option, on the date the stock options were granted.
A summary of stock option activity for 2009 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
remaining |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
price per |
|
|
|
|
|
contractual |
|
intrinsic |
(Options in millions) |
|
option |
|
Options |
|
life in years |
|
value |
Outstanding at January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
62.61 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
41.89 |
|
|
|
.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
33.12 |
|
|
|
(.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled |
|
|
75.00 |
|
|
|
(.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
64.37 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
61.06 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
Reserved for future grants at
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total excess of the $63.62 closing
price of Eaton common shares on the last trading day of 2009 over the exercise price of the stock
option, multiplied by the related number of options outstanding and exercisable. The aggregate
intrinsic value is not recognized for financial accounting purposes and the value changes based on
the daily changes in the fair market value of the Companys common shares.
Information related to stock options follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Pretax expense for stock options |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
After-tax expense for stock options |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
Income tax benefits related to stock options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported in operating activities in statement of cash flows |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Reported in financing activities in statement of cash flows |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Intrinsic value of stock options exercised |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
Total fair value of stock options vesting |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
As of December 31, 2009, the total compensation expense not yet recognized related to nonvested
stock options was $14, and the weighted-average period in which the expense is expected to be
recognized is 1.2 years.
Page 40
Restricted Stock Units and Awards
Restricted stock units and awards (RSUs) have been issued to certain employees at fair market value
at the date of grant. These awards entitle the holder to receive one common share for each RSU
upon vesting, generally over three years. A summary of the RSU activity for 2009 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
restricted |
|
Weighted |
|
|
stock |
|
-average |
|
|
award |
|
fair value |
|
|
units |
|
per award |
Non-vested at January 1, 2009 |
|
|
.5 |
|
|
$ |
78.62 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
43.60 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(.2 |
) |
|
|
74.40 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(.1 |
) |
|
|
47.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
48.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information related to RSUs follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Pretax expense for RSUs |
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
After-tax expense for RSUs |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
As of December 31, 2009, the total compensation expense not yet recognized related to nonvested
RSUs was $64, and the weighted-average period in which the expense is expected to be recognized is
1.8 years.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The components of Accumulated other comprehensive loss as reported in the Consolidated Balance
Sheet follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Foreign currency translation and related hedging instruments
(net of income tax benefit of $32 in 2009 and $77 in 2008) |
|
$ |
(183 |
) |
|
$ |
(532 |
) |
Deferred gain (loss) on cash flow hedges (net of income taxes
of $4 in 2009 and income tax benefit of $16 in 2008) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
Pensions (net of income tax benefit of $459 in 2009
and $501 in 2008) |
|
|
(911 |
) |
|
|
(912 |
) |
Other postretirement benefits (net of income tax benefit of
$95 in 2009 and $81 in 2008) |
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(1,208 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,538 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A discussion of the adjustments related to pensions and other postretirement benefit liabilities is
included in the Retirement Benefits Plans Note above.
INCOME TAXES
Income from continuing operations before income taxes is summarized below based on the geographic
location of the operation to which such earnings are attributable. Certain foreign operations are
branches of Eaton and are, therefore, subject to United States as well as foreign income tax
regulations. As a result, pretax income by location and the components of income tax expense by
taxing jurisdiction are not directly related. For purposes of this note to the consolidated
financial statements, non-United States operations include Puerto Rico.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing |
|
|
|
operations before income taxes |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
United States |
|
$ |
(298 |
) |
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
Non-United States |
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income before income taxes |
|
$ |
303 |
|
|
$ |
1,140 |
|
|
$ |
1,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
|
from continuing operations |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
State & local |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Non-United States |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current income tax expense |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
State & local |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
Non-United States |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred income tax (benefit) |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax (benefit) expense |
|
$ |
(82 |
) |
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliations of income taxes from the United States Federal statutory rate to the effective
income tax rate for continuing operations follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Income taxes at the United States Federal statutory
rate |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State & local income taxes |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Deductible dividends |
|
|
(2.1 |
)% |
|
|
(0.5 |
)% |
|
|
(0.4 |
)% |
Deductible
interest |
|
|
(2.3 |
)% |
|
|
(0.6 |
)% |
|
|
(0.6 |
)% |
Credit for increasing research activities |
|
|
(3.9 |
)% |
|
|
(1.2 |
)% |
|
|
(1.2 |
)% |
Other United States-net |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-United States operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign tax credit |
|
|
(2.5 |
)% |
|
|
(3.0 |
)% |
|
|
(1.2 |
)% |
Non-United States operations (earnings taxed
at other than United States tax rate) |
|
|
(52.6 |
)% |
|
|
(18.9 |
)% |
|
|
(19.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Worldwide
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
to tax liabilities |
|
|
(11.9 |
)% |
|
|
(3.6 |
)% |
|
|
(5.6 |
)% |
Adjustments to
valuation allowances |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
(5.9 |
)% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax (benefit) expense rate |
|
|
(27.2 |
)% |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The income tax benefit rate for 2009 was favorably affected by tax benefits of $104 from U.S.
Federal income tax losses where it is more likely than not that they
will be realized. The 2009 income tax rate reconciliation is also
impacted by the favorable non-United States operations tax rate
differential being applied to a significantly lower worldwide income
before income taxes. Eaton also
recognized income tax benefits of $13, $108 and $57 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, which
represented adjustments to worldwide tax liabilities and valuation allowances. The 2009 benefits
resulted from multiple income tax items including benefits related to the settlement of
international income tax audits. The 2008 income tax benefits reduced the effective income tax rate
for 2008 from 15.9% to 6.4%. The 2008 benefits resulted from multiple income tax items including a
benefit of $44 related to the consolidation of various legal entities and the recognition of $25 of
tax credits related to the transfer of certain international operations. The 2007 income tax
benefits reduced the effective income tax rate for 2007 from 13.2% to 7.8%. The 2007 income tax
benefits resulted from multiple income tax items including a $14 benefit from changes to state tax
laws and a favorable revaluation of worldwide deferred income tax assets.
With limited exceptions, no provision has been made for income taxes on undistributed earnings of
non-United States subsidiaries of $4,945 at December 31, 2009, since it is the Companys intention
to indefinitely reinvest undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries. It is not practicable
to estimate the additional income taxes and applicable foreign withholding taxes that would be
payable on the remittance of such undistributed earnings.
Worldwide income tax payments for 2009, 2008 and 2007 follows:
Page 42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Worldwide income tax payments |
|
$ |
124 |
|
|
$ |
185 |
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
Deferred Income Tax Assets & Liabilities
Significant components of current and long-term deferred income taxes follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term |
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
assets & |
|
|
Current |
|
|
assets & |
|
|
|
assets |
|
|
liabilities |
|
|
assets |
|
|
liabilities |
|
Accruals & other adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee benefits |
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
773 |
|
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
$ |
821 |
|
Depreciation & amortization |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(642 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(692 |
) |
Other accruals & adjustments |
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
Other items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
United States Federal income tax
loss carryforwards |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
United States Federal income tax
credit carryforwards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
United States state & local tax loss
carryforwards and tax credit
carryforwards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
Non-United States tax loss
carryforwards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206 |
|
Non-United States income tax
credit carryforwards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
Valuation allowance for income tax
loss and income tax credit
carryforwards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(360 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(259 |
) |
Other valuation allowance |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred income taxes |
|
$ |
377 |
|
|
$ |
423 |
|
|
$ |
239 |
|
|
$ |
428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the end of 2009, United States Federal income tax loss carryforwards and income tax credit
carryforwards were available to reduce future Federal income tax liabilities. A summary of these
carryforwards and their expiration dates are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2015 |
|
2020 |
|
2025 |
|
Not |
|
Related |
|
|
through |
|
through |
|
through |
|
through |
|
subject to |
|
valuation |
|
|
2014 |
|
2019 |
|
2024 |
|
2029 |
|
expiration |
|
allowance |
United States
Federal income tax
loss
carryforwards |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
Federal deferred
income tax assets
for income tax loss
carryforwards |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
United States
Federal income tax
credit
carryforwards |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
United States state and local tax loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards with a future tax
benefit are also available at the end of 2009. A summary of these carryforwards and their
expiration are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2015 |
|
2020 |
|
2025 |
|
2030 |
|
Related |
|
|
through |
|
through |
|
through |
|
through |
|
through |
|
valuation |
|
|
2014 |
|
2019 |
|
2024 |
|
2029 |
|
2034 |
|
allowance |
United States state
and local income
tax loss
carryforwards - net
of Federal tax
effect |
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
|
$6 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
United States state
and local income
tax credit
carryforwards - net
of Federal tax
effect |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
Page 43
At December 31, 2009, certain non-United States subsidiaries had tax loss carryforwards and income
tax credit carryforwards that are available to offset future taxable income. A summary of these
carryforwards and their expiration is provided below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2015 |
|
2020 |
|
2025 |
|
Not |
|
Related |
|
|
through |
|
through |
|
through |
|
through |
|
subject to |
|
valuation |
|
|
2014 |
|
2019 |
|
2024 |
|
2029 |
|
expiration |
|
allowance |
Non-United States tax loss
carryforwards |
|
$ |
155 |
|
|
$ |
146 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$2 |
|
$ |
708 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-United States deferred
income tax assets for
income tax loss
carryforwards |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
$ |
(279 |
) |
Non-United States income tax
credit carryforwards |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
Recoverability of Deferred Income Tax Assets
Eaton is subject to the income tax laws in the jurisdictions in which it operates. In order to
determine its income tax provision for financial statement purposes, Eaton must make significant
estimates and judgments about its business operations in these jurisdictions. These estimates and
judgments are also used in determining the deferred income tax assets and liabilities that have
been recognized for the differences between the financial accounting and income tax basis of
assets, liabilities, tax loss carryforwards and income tax credit carryforwards.
Management evaluates the realizability of deferred income tax assets for each of the jurisdictions
in which it operates. If the Company experiences cumulative pretax income in a particular
jurisdiction in the three-year period including the current and prior two years, management
normally concludes that the deferred income tax assets will more likely than not be realizable and
no valuation allowance is recognized, unless known or planned operating developments would lead
management to conclude otherwise. However, if the Company experiences cumulative pretax losses in
a particular jurisdiction in the three-year period including the current and prior two years,
management then considers a series of significant factors in the determination of whether the
deferred income tax assets can be realized. The significant factors include historical operating
results, known or planned operating developments, the period of time over which certain temporary
differences will reverse, consideration of the utilization of certain deferred tax liabilities, tax
law carryback capability in the particular country, prudent and feasible tax planning actions, and
estimates of future earnings and taxable income using the same assumptions as the Companys
goodwill and other impairment testing. After evaluation of these factors, if the deferred income
tax assets are expected to be realized within the tax carryforward period allowed for that specific
country, management would conclude that no valuation allowance would be required. To the extent
that the deferred income tax assets exceed the amount that is expected to be realized within the
tax carryforward period for a particular jurisdiction, management would conclude that a valuation
allowance is required.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are described in detail above. As of December 31, 2009,
U.S. Federal deferred income tax assets were $1.4 billion. The largest component of the deferred
income tax assets is due to the differing timing of revenue and expense recognition for income tax
versus financial statement purposes. In addition, the Company had a net operating loss in the U.S.
in 2009 and possesses certain income tax credit carryforwards that comprise the remainder of the
balance. Over the 20 year carryforward period available for net operating losses and general
business credits, taxable income of approximately $4.0 billion would need to be realized to utilize
all deferred income tax assets. After applying the methodology described above, as of December 31,
2009, management believes that it is more likely than not that the entire U.S. Federal deferred
income tax assets will be realized. Accordingly, the Company has not established a valuation
allowance on its U.S. Federal deferred income tax assets.
Applying the above methodology, valuation allowances have been established for certain U.S. state
and local income as well as certain non-U.S. deferred income tax assets to the extent they are not
expected to be realized within the particular tax carryforward period.
Unrecognized Income Tax Benefits
Eatons historical policy has been to enter into tax planning strategies only if it is more likely
than not that the benefit would be sustained upon audit. For example, the Company does not enter
into any of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Listed Transactions as set forth in Treasury
Regulation 1.6011-4.
Page 44
A summary of gross unrecognized income tax benefits follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
139 |
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
Increases and decreases as a result of positions taken during prior
years: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers from (to) valuation allowances |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
Other increases |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Other decreases, including foreign currency translation |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
Balances related to acquired businesses |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increases as a result of positions taken during the current year |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Decreases relating to settlements with tax authorities |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
Decreases as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
197 |
|
|
$ |
139 |
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If all of the gross unrecognized tax benefits were recognized, the net impact on the effective
income tax rate would be $149.
Eaton recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized income tax benefits in the
provision for income tax expense. The Company has accrued penalties in jurisdictions where they are
automatically applied to any deficiency, regardless of the merit of the position. As of December
31, 2009, Eaton had accrued approximately $43 for the payment of worldwide interest and penalties.
The Company had accrued approximately $38 at December 31, 2008.
The resolution of the majority of Eatons unrecognized income tax benefits is dependent on
uncontrollable factors such as law changes; new case law; the willingness of the income tax
authority to settle the issue, including the timing thereof; and other factors. Therefore, for the
majority of unrecognized income tax benefits, it is not reasonably possible to estimate the
increase or decrease in the next 12 months. For each of the unrecognized income tax benefits where
it is possible to estimate the increase or decrease in the balance within the next 12 months, the
Company does not anticipate any significant change.
Eaton or its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the United States and foreign jurisdictions.
The U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is currently in the process of conducting an examination of
the Companys U.S. income tax returns for 2005 and 2006. Eaton is also under examination for the
income tax filings in various state and foreign jurisdictions. With only a few exceptions, the
Company is no longer subject to state and local income tax examinations for years before 2006, or
foreign examinations for years before 2004. Eaton does not anticipate any adjustments that would
result in a material change in financial position.
OTHER INFORMATION
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable are net of an allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31, 2009 and 2008 as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
Inventories
|
The components of inventories follow:
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
608 |
|
|
$ |
683 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories at FIFO |
|
|
1,431 |
|
|
|
1,670 |
|
Excess of FIFO over LIFO cost |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
$ |
1,326 |
|
|
$ |
1,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 45
Inventories at FIFO accounted for using the LIFO method were 46% and 43% at the end of 2009 and
2008, respectively.
Warranty Liabilities
A summary of the current and long-term liabilities for warranties follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
165 |
|
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
$ |
176 |
|
Current year provision |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
Business acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Claims paid/satisfied |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
Other |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
147 |
|
|
$ |
165 |
|
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease Commitments
Eaton leases certain real properties and equipment. Minimum rental commitments at December 31, 2009
under noncancelable operating leases, which expire at various dates and in most cases contain
renewal options, for each of the next five years and thereafter in the aggregate were, $121 in
2010, $96 in 2011, $64 in 2012, $45 in 2013, $27 in 2014 and $47 thereafter.
Rental expense follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Rental expense
|
|
$ |
177 |
|
|
$ |
173 |
|
|
$ |
133 |
|
Net Income per Common Share
A summary of the calculation of net income per common share attributable to common shareholders
assuming dilution and basic follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Shares in millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
$ |
1,055 |
|
|
$ |
959 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
|
$ |
994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of common shares
outstanding diluted |
|
|
167.9 |
|
|
|
162.3 |
|
|
|
150.3 |
|
Less dilutive effect of stock options and
restricted stock awards |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of common shares outstanding basic |
|
|
166.4 |
|
|
|
160.2 |
|
|
|
147.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
|
$ |
6.50 |
|
|
$ |
6.38 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.02 |
|
|
|
.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
|
$ |
6.52 |
|
|
$ |
6.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
2.31 |
|
|
$ |
6.58 |
|
|
$ |
6.51 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.02 |
|
|
|
.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2.31 |
|
|
$ |
6.60 |
|
|
$ |
6.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2009 and 2008, 6.6 million and 8.5 million stock options, respectively, were excluded from the
calculation of diluted net income per common share because the exercise price of the options
exceeded the average market price of the common shares during the period and their effect,
accordingly, would have been antidilutive.
Financial Assets & Liabilities Measured at Fair Value
Financial instruments are categorized into a fair value hierarchy of three levels, based on the
degree of subjectivity inherent in the valuation methodology as follows:
|
|
Level 1 - Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets in active markets. |
|
|
Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar assets in active markets, and inputs that are observable
for the asset, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial
instrument. |
Page 46
|
|
Level 3 - Unobservable prices or inputs. |
A summary of financial instruments recognized at fair value at December 31, 2009, and the fair
value measurement used, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
value |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Cash |
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward exchange
contracts |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
Related long-term debt converted to
floating interest rates by interest
rate swaps |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
769 |
|
|
$ |
773 |
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and current portion of long-term debt had a carrying value of $3,354 and fair value
of $3,601 at December 31, 2009 compared to $3,459 and $3,427 at the end of 2008.
Assets of $2,042 related to defined benefit pension plans were also measured at fair value at
December 31, 2009, compared to $1,674 at December 31, 2008. The assets related to the defined
benefit pension plans are described in the Retirement Benefits Plans Note above.
Disclosures about Derivative Financial Instruments & Hedging Activities
Information as to derivative financial instruments recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as
of December 31, 2009 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of |
|
|
|
derivative financial instruments |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
current |
|
|
long-term |
|
|
current |
|
|
|
assets |
|
|
assets |
|
|
liabilities |
|
Derivatives designated as hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps
(fair value hedges) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts
(cash flow hedges) |
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Commodity contracts (cash flow hedges) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts |
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
Commodity contracts |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009, the notional amount related to derivatives designated as hedges in the table
above was $879, including $700 of fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps.
Amounts recognized in net income and in Eaton shareholders equity for the year ended December 31,
2009 follow:
Page 47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain |
|
|
|
|
(loss) recognized |
|
|
|
|
in net income |
|
|
Derivatives designated as fair
value hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-to-floating interest rate
swaps |
|
$ |
(47 |
) |
|
Interest expense |
Related long-term debt converted
to floating interest rates by
interest rate swaps |
|
|
47 |
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain |
|
|
Amount of gain |
|
|
|
|
|
(loss) |
|
|
(loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
recognized in |
|
|
reclassified |
|
|
|
|
|
Eaton |
|
|
from Eaton |
|
|
|
|
|
shareholders |
|
|
shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
equity |
|
|
equity |
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as
cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency
exchange contracts |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
Cost of products sold |
Commodity contracts |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009, $6 of deferred net gains related to foreign currency exchange contracts
and commodity contracts that were recognized in Eaton shareholders equity are expected to be
reclassified to net income during the next twelve months.
In 2008, Eaton issued Yen 10 billion ($110 million) of 10-year long-term debt. The debt is
designated and qualifies as a non-derivative instrument hedging the foreign currency exposure of
Eatons net investment in Japanese operations. As of December 31, 2009, a gain of $2 resulting
from this hedge was recognized in Eaton shareholders equity.
BUSINESS SEGMENT & GEOGRAPHIC REGION INFORMATION
Eaton Corporation is a diversified power management company with 2009 sales of $11.9 billion. Eaton
is a global technology leader in electrical components and systems for power quality, distribution
and control; hydraulics components, systems and services for industrial and mobile equipment;
aerospace fuel, hydraulics and pneumatic systems for commercial and military use; and truck and
automotive drivetrain and powertrain systems for performance, fuel economy and safety. Eaton has
approximately 70,000 employees in over 50 countries, and sells products to customers in more than
150 countries.
In 2009, Eaton changed its business segment financial reporting structure. The Electrical segment
was divided into Electrical Americas and Electrical Rest of World. The Hydraulics, Aerospace,
Truck and Automotive segments continued as individual reporting segments. Accordingly, business
segment information for prior years has been restated to conform to the current years
presentation. The change to the business segments did not affect net income for any of the periods
presented.
Electrical Americas & Electrical Rest of World
The Electrical segments are global leaders in power distribution, power quality, industrial
automation and power control products and services. Products include circuit breakers, switchgear,
UPS systems, power distribution units, panelboards, loadcenters, motor controls, meters, sensors,
relays and inverters. The principal markets for the Electrical Americas and Electrical Rest of
World segments are industrial, institutional, government, utility, commercial, residential,
information technology and original equipment manufacturer customers. These products are used
wherever there is a demand for electrical power in commercial buildings, data centers, residences,
apartment and office buildings, hospitals, factories and utilities. The segments share several common global
customers, but a large number of customers are located regionally and sales are made directly and
indirectly through distributors, resellers and manufacturers representatives.
Page 48
Hydraulics
The Hydraulics segment is a worldwide leader in reliable, high-efficiency hydraulic components and
systems for use in mobile and industrial markets. Eaton offers a wide range of power products
including pumps, motors and hydraulic power units; a broad range of controls and sensing products,
including valves, cylinders and electronic controls; a full range of fluid conveyance products,
including industrial and hydraulic hose, fittings, and assemblies, thermoplastic hose and tubing,
couplings, connectors, and assembly equipment; filtration systems solutions; heavy-duty drum and
disc brakes; and golf grips. The principal market segments for Hydraulics include oil and gas,
renewable energy, marine, agriculture, construction, mining, forestry, utility, material handling,
truck and bus, machine tools, molding, primary metals and power generation. Key manufacturers in
these markets and other customers are located globally, and these products are sold and serviced
through a variety of channels.
Aerospace
The Aerospace segment is a leading global supplier to the commercial and military aviation and
aerospace industries. Products include hydraulic power generation systems for aerospace
applications including pumps, motors, hydraulic power units, hose and fittings, electro-hydraulic
pumps and power and load management systems; controls and sensing products, including valves,
cylinders, electronic controls, electromechanical actuators, sensors, displays and panels, aircraft
flap and slat systems and nose wheel steering systems; fluid conveyance products, including hose,
thermoplastic tubing, fittings, adapters, couplings, sealing and ducting; and fuel systems,
including fuel pumps, sensors, valves, adapters and regulators. The principal markets for the
Aerospace segment are manufacturers of commercial and military aircraft and related after-market
customers. These manufacturers and other customers operate globally, and these products are sold
and serviced through a variety of channels.
Truck
The Truck segment is a leader in the design, manufacture and marketing of a complete line of
powertrain systems and components for commercial vehicles. Products include transmissions, clutches
and hybrid electric power systems. The principal markets for the Truck segment are original
equipment manufacturers and after-market customers of heavy-, medium- and light-duty trucks and
passenger cars. These manufacturers and other customers are located globally, and most sales of
these products are made directly to these customers.
Automotive
The Automotive segment is a leading supplier of critical components that reduce emissions and fuel
consumption and improve stability and performance of cars, light trucks and commercial vehicles.
Products include superchargers, engine valves and valve actuation systems, cylinder heads, locking
and limited slip differentials, transmission controls, engine controls, fuel vapor components,
compressor control clutches for mobile refrigeration, fluid connectors and hoses for air
conditioning and power steering, decorative spoilers, underhood plastic components, fluid
conveyance products including, hose, thermoplastic tubing, fittings, adapters, couplings and
sealing products to the global automotive industry. The principal markets for the Automotive
segment are original equipment manufacturers and aftermarket customers of light-duty trucks and
passenger cars. These manufacturers and other customers are located globally, and most sales of
these products are made directly to these customers.
Other Information
No single customer represented more than 10% of net sales in 2009, 2008 or 2007.
The accounting policies of the business segments are generally the same as the policies described
under Accounting Policies above, except that inventories and related cost of products sold of the
segments are accounted for using the FIFO method and operating profit only reflects the service
cost component related to pensions and other postretirement benefits. Intersegment sales and
transfers are accounted for at the same prices as if the sales and transfers were made to third
parties.
For purposes of business segment performance measurement, the Company does not allocate to the
business segments items that are of a non-operating nature, or corporate organizational and
functional expenses of a governance nature. Corporate expenses consist of corporate office expenses
including compensation, benefits, occupancy, depreciation, and other administrative costs.
Identifiable assets of the business segments exclude goodwill, other intangible assets, and general
corporate assets, which principally consist of cash, short-term investments, deferred income taxes,
certain accounts receivable, certain property, plant and equipment, and certain other assets.
Page 49
Geographic Region Information
Net sales are measured based on the geographic location of the selling plant. Long-lived assets
consist of property, plant and equipment-net.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived |
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
assets |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
6,767 |
|
|
$ |
1,024 |
|
Canada |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
Europe |
|
|
3,007 |
|
|
|
748 |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
|
1,642 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
(959 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
11,873 |
|
|
$ |
2,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
8,775 |
|
|
$ |
1,129 |
|
Canada |
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
1,455 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
Europe |
|
|
4,002 |
|
|
|
827 |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
|
1,963 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
(1,247 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
15,376 |
|
|
$ |
2,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
8,556 |
|
|
$ |
1,158 |
|
Canada |
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
Europe |
|
|
2,624 |
|
|
|
595 |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
|
1,144 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
(908 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,033 |
|
|
$ |
2,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 50
Business Segment Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Americas |
|
$ |
3,410 |
|
|
$ |
4,016 |
|
|
$ |
3,601 |
|
Electrical Rest of World |
|
|
2,483 |
|
|
|
2,904 |
|
|
|
1,158 |
|
Hydraulics |
|
|
1,692 |
|
|
|
2,523 |
|
|
|
2,391 |
|
Aerospace |
|
|
1,602 |
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
|
|
1,594 |
|
Truck |
|
|
1,457 |
|
|
|
2,251 |
|
|
|
2,147 |
|
Automotive |
|
|
1,229 |
|
|
|
1,871 |
|
|
|
2,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
11,873 |
|
|
$ |
15,376 |
|
|
$ |
13,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
operating profit (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Americas |
|
$ |
518 |
|
|
$ |
630 |
|
|
$ |
534 |
|
Electrical Rest of World |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Hydraulics |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
Aerospace |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
Truck |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
Automotive |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(79 |
) |
Interest expense-net |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
(147 |
) |
Pension & other postretirement benefits expense |
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
(164 |
) |
Stock option expense |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
Other
corporate expense-net |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
1,055 |
|
Income tax
(benefit) expense |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
|
|
973 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
1,008 |
|
Adjustment of net income for noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
|
$ |
994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business segment operating profit was reduced by
acquisition integration charges as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Americas |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Rest of World |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
Hydraulics |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Aerospace |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Automotive |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 51
Business Segment Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Identifiable assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Americas |
|
$ |
1,050 |
|
|
$ |
1,238 |
|
|
$ |
1,264 |
|
Electrical Rest of World |
|
|
1,625 |
|
|
|
1,817 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
Hydraulics |
|
|
939 |
|
|
|
1,132 |
|
|
|
1,192 |
|
Aerospace |
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
798 |
|
|
|
852 |
|
Truck |
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
801 |
|
|
|
996 |
|
Automotive |
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
1,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total identifiable assets |
|
|
6,006 |
|
|
|
6,733 |
|
|
|
6,145 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
5,435 |
|
|
|
5,232 |
|
|
|
3,982 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
2,441 |
|
|
|
2,518 |
|
|
|
1,557 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
2,172 |
|
|
|
1,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
16,282 |
|
|
$ |
16,655 |
|
|
$ |
13,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for property, plant & equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Americas |
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
Electrical Rest of World |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Hydraulics |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Aerospace |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Truck |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
Automotive |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenditures for property, plant & equipment |
|
$ |
195 |
|
|
$ |
448 |
|
|
$ |
354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of property, plant & equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Americas |
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
Electrical Rest of World |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Hydraulics |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
Aerospace |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Truck |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
Automotive |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation of property, plant & equipment |
|
$ |
398 |
|
|
$ |
409 |
|
|
$ |
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 52
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION & RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Millions of dollars unless indicated otherwise (per share data assume dilution)
Net income refers to net income attributable to Eaton common shareholders
OVERVIEW OF THE COMPANY
Eaton Corporation is a diversified power management company with 2009 sales of $11.9 billion. Eaton
is a global technology leader in electrical components and systems for power quality, distribution
and control; hydraulics components, systems and services for industrial and mobile equipment;
aerospace fuel, hydraulics and pneumatic systems for commercial and military use; and truck and
automotive drivetrain and powertrain systems for performance, fuel economy and safety. Eaton has
approximately 70,000 employees in over 50 countries, and sells products to customers in more than
150 countries.
In 2009, Eaton changed its business segment financial reporting structure. The Electrical segment
was divided into Electrical Americas and Electrical Rest of World. The Hydraulics, Aerospace,
Truck and Automotive segments continued as individual reporting segments. Accordingly, business
segment information for prior years has been restated to conform to the current years
presentation. The change to the business segments did not affect net income for any of the periods
presented.
The principal markets for the Electrical Americas and Electrical Rest of World segments are
industrial, institutional, government, utility, commercial, residential, information technology and
original equipment manufacturers. These products are used wherever there is a demand for electrical
power in commercial buildings, data centers, residences, apartment and office buildings, hospitals,
factories and utilities. The segments share several common global customers, but a large number of customers
are located regionally and sales are made directly and indirectly through distributors, resellers
and manufacturers representatives.
The principal markets for the Hydraulics segment include oil and gas, renewable energy, marine,
agriculture, construction, mining, forestry, utility, material handling, truck and bus, machine
tools, molding, primary metals and power generation. Key manufacturers in these markets and other
customers are located globally, and these products are sold and serviced through a variety of
channels.
The principal markets for the Aerospace segment are manufacturers of commercial and military
aircraft and related after-market customers. These manufacturers and customers are located
globally, and products are sold and serviced through a variety of channels.
The principal markets for the Truck and Automotive segments are original equipment manufacturers
and after-market customers of heavy-, medium-, and light-duty trucks, SUVs, CUVs, or passenger
cars. Customers are located globally, and most sales are made directly.
SUMMARY OF RESULTS FOR 2009
Eaton reported sales of $11.9 billion in 2009, which were 23% below 2008, and net income of $383,
which declined 64% from 2008. Net income per common share was $2.27, a reduction of 65% from 2008.
Looking at 2009 as a whole, Eatons net income was adversely affected by the decline in net sales
due to the global economic recession. The Company believes the steps it took to deal with the
downturn, including workforce reductions and other cost containment actions, effectively adjusted
its cost structure to ensure it can operate profitably at lower sales volumes and realize
attractive incremental profits on increases in net sales.
Financial results in 2009 for each of Eatons business segments were adversely affected by the
significant downturn in all markets in all geographic regions. Profits were impacted across the
Company by the sales declines as a result of the market downturn, offset by the net savings
resulting from the workforce reductions in all segments and other cost containment actions. Sales
and operating profit of the Electrical Americas segment declined 15% and 18%, respectively, due to
a decline in end markets that was partially offset by sales growth above end markets in the U.S.
Sales of the Electrical Rest of World segment declined 15% primarily due to end markets that fell
in Europe and Asia, while operating profit declined 54%. Sales of the Hydraulics segment declined
33% due to the sharp fall in end markets that were down in all regions, while operating profit
declined 82%. Sales and operating profit of the
Aerospace segment declined 12% and 13%, respectively, reflecting the
decline in end markets. Sales
of the Truck segment declined 35% primarily due to lower end markets, and operating profit declined
88%. Sales of the Automotive segment declined 34% due to lower end markets, resulting in operating
losses of $10.
Page 53
In 2009, cash flow from operations of $1.4 billion was a near record in spite of the difficult
economic environment. Eaton used its cash flow in 2009 to markedly reduce long-term liabilities,
with over $750 of debt paid off during the year, $271 contributed to global pension plans in 2009,
and an additional $300 contributed to the U.S. pension plan in January 2010. As a result of these
actions, the Company has greatly strengthened its financial position, with little commercial paper
outstanding, no long-term debt maturities until the middle of 2012, and no additional contributions
to the U.S. pension plan required until 2011.
The following are highlights of 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
11,873 |
|
|
$ |
15,376 |
|
|
|
(23 |
)% |
Gross profit |
|
|
3,091 |
|
|
|
4,185 |
|
|
|
(26 |
)% |
Percent of net sales |
|
|
26.0 |
% |
|
|
27.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
(73 |
)% |
Income after income taxes |
|
$ |
385 |
|
|
$ |
1,067 |
|
|
|
(64 |
)% |
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
(64 |
)% |
Adjustment of net income for noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
|
|
(64 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share - diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
|
$ |
6.50 |
|
|
|
(65 |
)% |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
|
$ |
6.52 |
|
|
|
(65 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding - diluted (in millions) |
|
|
167.9 |
|
|
|
162.3 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Net sales in 2009 declined by 23% compared to 2008. The reduction included 22% from core
sales, which resulted from the global economic recession, and 3% from foreign exchange, partially
offset by a 2% increase from acquisitions of businesses. The decline in core sales was driven by
weakness in key end markets for each business segment in 2009. The reduction from foreign exchange
was primarily due to changes in exchange rates for the euro, the Brazilian real, the U.K. pound
sterling, and the Polish zloty. Acquisitions of businesses were primarily the Moeller electrical
business, acquired in April 2008, and the Phoenixtec electrical business, acquired in February
2008.
Gross profit declined by 26% in 2009 compared to 2008. The reduction was primarily due to the
decline in net sales discussed above; operating inefficiencies related to the difficulty in
absorbing fixed manufacturing costs resulting from reduced sales; and pretax charges of $182
resulting from actions taken in 2009 to reduce the workforce including related pension settlement
and curtailment expense, a substantial portion of which was recognized in Cost of products sold.
These reductions in gross profit were partially offset by savings associated with workforce
reductions and other cost containment actions, and the benefits of integrating recently acquired
businesses, primarily Moeller and Phoenixtec.
In 2009, Eaton reported net income of $383 and net income per common share of $2.27, declines of
64% and 65%, respectively, compared to net income of $1,058 and net income per share of $6.52 for
2008. The declines were primarily due to lower net sales in 2009, the factors that affected gross
profit discussed above, partially offset by an income tax benefit rate of 27.2% in 2009 compared to
an effective income tax expense rate of 6.4% in 2008. Net income per share was also reduced due to
a higher number of average shares outstanding in 2009 compared to 2008, resulting principally from
the sale of 18.678 million shares in 2008.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $1,408 in 2009, a slight decline from $1,441 in 2008.
Operating cash flows in 2009 reflected lower net income of $385 in 2009 compared to net income of
$1,070 in 2008, with results for 2009 reflecting the effects of the global economic recession. The
effect of this decline in net income was more than offset by the $944 cash flow resulting from the net
reduction in funding of working capital in 2009 compared to 2008. The reduction in working
capital, primarily accounts receivable and inventory, was due to lower levels of operations
resulting from the global economic recession, and internal efforts to reduce the investment in
working capital. Cash and short-term investments totaled $773 at December 31, 2009, an increase of
$243 from $530 at year-end 2008.
Page 54
Total debt of $3,467 at December 31, 2009 declined by $804 from $4,271 at year-end 2008. The
decline was primarily due to a $699 reduction of short-term debt (largely commercial paper) during
2009, and a $264 reduction in current portion of long-term debt due to the repayment of certain
long-term debt that matured during 2009. Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt
were reduced through the use of cash generated from operations and from long-term borrowings. In
2009, Eaton issued $550 of long-term debt through the sale of $250 of 5.95% Notes due 2014 and $300
of 6.95% Notes due 2019, with the cash proceeds from the sale of the Notes used to repay
outstanding short-term commercial paper. The net-debt-to-capital ratio was 28.4% at December 31,
2009 compared to 37.2% at the end of 2008, reflecting the combined effect of the $804 decrease in
total debt, the $243 increase in cash and short-term investments, and the $460 increase in Eaton
shareholders equity. The increase in equity primarily resulted from net income of $383 and
foreign currency translation adjustments of $349, partially offset by cash dividends paid of $334
and other adjustments.
Net working capital of $1,835 at December 31, 2009 rose by $785 from $1,050 at the end of 2008. The
increase was primarily due to the reduction of short-term debt and current portion of long-term
debt by $963 compared to the end of 2008, largely due to the repayment of short-term commercial
paper and current portion of long-term debt as discussed above. Changes in other working capital
included an increase of $243 in cash and short-term investments primarily due to strong cash flow
from operations, reductions of $396 in accounts receivable and $228 in inventories due to lower
sales and internal efforts to reduce the investment in working capital, and a net increase of $203
in other working capital. The current ratio was 1.7 at December 31, 2009, up from 1.3 at year-end
2008.
In 2009, Eaton acquired one business and entered into a joint venture. The Statements of
Consolidated Income include the results of these businesses from the dates of the transactions.
These transactions are summarized below:
|
|
On September 1, 2009, Eaton acquired the remaining shares of Micro Innovation Holding AG,
increasing its ownership from 50% to 100%. This company is a Switzerland-based manufacturer
of human machine interfaces, programmable logic controllers and input/output devices. This
business had sales of $33 for 2008 and is included in the Electrical Rest of World segment. |
|
|
On July 2, 2009, Eaton entered into a joint venture in Abu Dhabi. The joint venture
operates as SEG Middle East Power Solutions & Switchboard Manufacture LLC, a manufacturer of
low voltage switchboards and control panel assemblies for use in the Middle East power
generation and industrial markets. This business had annual sales of $10 for 2008 and is
included in the Electrical Rest of World segment. |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 2009 COMPARED TO 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
(Decrease) |
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
11,873 |
|
|
$ |
15,376 |
|
|
|
(23 |
)% |
Gross profit |
|
|
3,091 |
|
|
|
4,185 |
|
|
|
(26 |
)% |
Percent of net sales |
|
|
26.0 |
% |
|
|
27.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
(73 |
)% |
Income after income taxes |
|
$ |
385 |
|
|
$ |
1,067 |
|
|
|
(64 |
)% |
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
(64 |
)% |
Adjustment of net income for noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
|
|
(64 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share - diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
|
$ |
6.50 |
|
|
|
(65 |
)% |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
|
$ |
6.52 |
|
|
|
(65 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding - diluted (in millions) |
|
|
167.9 |
|
|
|
162.3 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Page 55
Net sales in 2009 declined by 23% compared to 2008. The reduction included 22% from core
sales, which resulted from the global economic recession and 3% from foreign exchange, partially
offset by a 2% increase from acquisitions of businesses. The decline in core sales was driven by
weakness in key end markets for each business segment in 2009. The reduction from foreign exchange
was primarily due to changes in exchange rates for the euro, the Brazilian real, the U.K. pound
sterling, and the Polish zloty. Acquisitions of businesses were primarily the Moeller electrical
business, acquired in April 2008, and the Phoenixtec electrical business, acquired in February
2008.
Gross profit declined by 26% in 2009 compared to 2008. The reduction was primarily due to the
decline in net sales discussed above; operating inefficiencies related to the difficulty in
absorbing fixed manufacturing costs resulting from reduced sales; and pretax charges of $182
resulting from actions taken in 2009 to reduce the workforce including related pension settlement
and curtailment expense, a substantial portion of which was recognized in Cost of products sold.
These reductions in gross profit were partially offset by savings associated with workforce
reductions and other cost containment actions, and the benefits of integrating recently acquired
businesses, primarily Moeller and Phoenixtec.
Net Sales by Geographic Region
Net sales are measured based on the geographic location of the selling plant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Decrease |
United States |
|
$ |
6,767 |
|
|
$ |
8,775 |
|
|
|
(23 |
)% |
Canada |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
(17 |
)% |
Latin America |
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
1,455 |
|
|
|
(27 |
)% |
Europe |
|
|
3,007 |
|
|
|
4,002 |
|
|
|
(25 |
)% |
Asia Pacific |
|
|
1,642 |
|
|
|
1,963 |
|
|
|
(16 |
)% |
Eliminations |
|
|
(959 |
) |
|
|
(1,247 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,873 |
|
|
$ |
15,376 |
|
|
|
(23 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales declines in 2009 of 23% in the United States, 17% in Canada, and 27% in Latin America were
primarily due to the global economic recession. In Europe, sales in 2009 declined 25% compared to
2008, primarily due to the global economic recession, partially offset by the acquisition of the
Moeller electrical business, acquired in April 2008. In Asia Pacific, sales declined 16% in
2009 primarily due to the global economic recession, partially offset by the acquisition of the
Phoenixtec electrical business, acquired in February 2008.
Other Results of Operations
Eaton took significant actions in 2009 to reduce its workforce in response to the severe economic
downturn. The reductions totaled approximately 17% of the full-time workforce. These actions
resulted in the recognition of severance and pension and other postretirement benefits expense of
$182 in 2009. These charges were primarily included in the Statements of Consolidated Income in
Cost of products sold or Selling & administrative expense, as appropriate. In Business Segment
Information, the charges reduced Operating profit of the related business segment.
Due to limitations imposed by the Pension Protection Act on pension lump sum distributions, Eatons
U.S. Qualified Pension Plan became restricted in 2009 from making 100% lump sum payments. As a
result, the plan experienced a significant increase in lump sum payments before the limitation went
into effect. Total pension settlement expense was $86 in 2009, of which $83 was attributable to
the U.S. pension plans. A portion of this expense was attributable to the workforce reduction in
2009. These charges were primarily included in the Statements of Consolidated Income in Cost of
products sold or Selling & administrative expense, as appropriate. In Business Segment Information,
the charges were included in Pension & other postretirement benefits expense.
As a result of the workforce reduction in 2009, curtailment expense of $22 related to pension plans
was recognized in 2009. The curtailment expense included recognition of the change in the projected
benefit obligation, as well as recognition of a portion of the unrecognized prior service cost.
These charges were primarily included in the Statements of Consolidated Income in Cost of products
sold or Selling & administrative expense, as appropriate. In Business Segment Information, the
charges were included in Pension & other postretirement benefits expense.
Page 56
In 2009 and 2008, Eaton incurred charges related to the integration of acquired businesses. These
charges, which consisted of plant consolidations and integration, were recognized as expense as
incurred. A summary of these charges follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Electrical Americas |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Electrical Rest of World |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Hydraulics |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Aerospace |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Automotive |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax charges |
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After-tax charges |
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
Per common share |
|
$ |
.32 |
|
|
$ |
.31 |
|
Charges in 2009 were related primarily to the integration of the following acquisitions: Integrated
Hydraulics, Kirloskar, Moeller, Phoenixtec and Argo-Tech. Charges in 2008 were related primarily to
the integration of the following acquisitions: Kirloskar, Moeller, Phoenixtec, the MGE small
systems UPS business, Saturn, Argo-Tech, Ronningen-Petter, Synflex, PerkinElmer and Cobham. These
charges were included in the Statements of Consolidated Income in Cost of products sold or Selling
& administrative expense, as appropriate. In Business Segment Information, the charges reduced
Operating profit of the related business segment.
In 2008, charges of $27 were recognized related to the closure of the automotive engine valve
lifters manufacturing plant in Massa, Italy. These charges, consisting of $17 for severance, $7 for
the write-down of assets and $3 for other costs, reduced operating profit of the Automotive
segment. These charges were primarily included in the Statements of Consolidated Income in Cost of
products sold.
During 2009, income tax benefits of $82 were recognized (a tax benefit rate of 27.2% for 2009)
compared to income tax expense of $73 for 2008 (a tax expense rate of 6.4% for 2008). The income
tax benefit rate for 2009 was favorably affected by tax benefits of $104 from U.S. Federal income
tax losses where it is more likely than not that they will be realized. Eaton also recognized
income tax benefits of $13 and $108 in 2009 and 2008, respectively, which represented adjustments
to worldwide tax liabilities and valuation allowances. The 2009 benefits resulted from multiple
income tax items including benefits related to the settlement of international income tax audits.
The 2008 income tax benefits reduced the effective income tax rate from 15.9% to 6.4%. The 2008
benefits resulted from multiple income tax items including a benefit of $44 related to the
consolidation of various legal entities and the recognition of $25 of tax credits related to the
transfer of certain international operations. Further analysis regarding the change in the
effective income tax rate in 2009 compared to 2008 is found in Income Taxes in the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In 2009, Eaton reported net income of $383 and net income per common share of $2.27, declines of
64% and 65%, respectively, compared to net income of $1,058 and net income per share of $6.52 for
2008. The declines were primarily due to lower net sales in 2009, the factors that affected gross
profit discussed above, partially offset by the income tax benefit rate of 27.2% in 2009 compared
to an effective income tax expense rate of 6.4% in 2008, discussed above. Net income per share was
also reduced due to a higher number of average shares outstanding in 2009 compared to 2008,
resulting principally from the sale of 18.678 million shares in 2008.
In 2009, Eaton adopted the revised standard related to noncontrolling interests in consolidated
financial statements. This standard clarifies accounting and disclosures related to noncontrolling
interests, sometimes referred to as minority interest, which is the portion of equity in a
subsidiary not owned, directly or indirectly, by Eaton. As a result of the adoption of this
standard, prior period amounts were reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. The
adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on Eatons financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
Page 57
RESULTS BY BUSINESS SEGMENT
Electrical Americas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Decrease |
Net sales |
|
$ |
3,410 |
|
|
$ |
4,016 |
|
|
|
(15 |
)% |
Operating profit |
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
(18 |
)% |
Operating margin |
|
|
15.2 |
% |
|
|
15.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Sales of the Electrical Americas segment declined 15% in 2009 compared to 2008. The reduction
included 14% from core sales and 1% from foreign exchange. The decline in core sales was driven by
weakness in non-residential and residential construction markets during 2009 due to the global
economic recession, partially offset by a 7% increase from outgrowing end markets. The decline in
end markets in 2009 reflected lower private nonresidential construction spending in the United
States, which declined by 23% in 2009.
Operating profit declined 18% in 2009 compared to 2008. The reduction was due to the decline in net
sales discussed above, partially offset by net savings resulting from the workforce reductions and
other cost containment actions. Operating profit was reduced by acquisition integration charges of
$4 in both 2009 and 2008, which reduced the operating margin by 0.1% in both 2009 and 2008.
Electrical Rest of World
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Decrease |
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,483 |
|
|
$ |
2,904 |
|
|
|
(15 |
)% |
Operating profit |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
(54 |
)% |
Operating margin |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Sales of the Electrical Rest of World segment declined 15% in 2009 compared to 2008. The reduction
included 19% from core sales and 5% from foreign exchange, partially offset by a 9% increase from
acquisitions of businesses. The decline in core sales was due to softness in European and Asian
markets during 2009 due to the global economic recession. Acquisitions of businesses were primarily
the Moeller electrical business, acquired in April 2008, and the Phoenixtec electrical business,
acquired in February 2008.
Operating profit declined 54% in 2009 compared to 2008. The reduction was largely due to the
decline in sales described above, unabsorbed fixed costs resulting from significant sales
reductions, and changes in sales mix, partially offset by net savings resulting from the workforce
reductions and other cost containment actions. Operating profit was reduced by acquisition
integration charges of $60 in 2009 compared to charges of $43 in 2008, which reduced the operating
margin by 2.4% in 2009 and 1.5% in 2008. Acquisition integration charges in 2009 primarily
related to Moeller and Phoenixtec, while charges in 2008 also included the MGE small systems UPS
business.
On September 1, 2009, Eaton acquired the remaining shares of Micro Innovation Holding AG,
increasing its ownership from 50% to 100%. This company is a Switzerland-based manufacturer of
human machine interfaces, programmable logic controllers and input/output devices. This business
had sales of $33 for 2008.
On July 2, 2009, Eaton entered into a joint venture in Abu Dhabi. The joint venture operates as
SEG Middle East Power Solutions & Switchboard Manufacture LLC, a manufacturer of low voltage
switchboards and control panel assemblies for use in the Middle East power generation and
industrial markets. This business had annual sales of $10 for 2008.
Hydraulics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Decrease |
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,692 |
|
|
$ |
2,523 |
|
|
|
(33 |
)% |
Operating profit |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
(82 |
)% |
Operating margin |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Sales of the Hydraulics segment declined 33% in 2009 compared to 2008. The reduction included 32%
from core sales and 2% from foreign exchange, partially offset by a 1% increase from acquisitions
of businesses. The decline in core sales resulted from market weakness in all regions beginning in
late
2008 and continuing throughout 2009 due to the global economic recession, with the U.S. leading the
decline and Asia Pacific and Latin American markets having relatively lower declines.
Page 58
Operating profit declined 82% in 2009 compared to 2008. The reduction was primarily due to the
decline in sales discussed above and operating inefficiencies related to the difficulty in
absorbing fixed manufacturing costs resulting from reduced sales in 2009, partially offset by net
savings resulting from the workforce reductions and other cost containment actions. Operating
profit was reduced by acquisition integration charges of $3 in 2009 compared to charges of $6 in
2008, which reduced the operating margin by 0.2% in both 2009 and 2008.
Aerospace
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Decrease |
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,602 |
|
|
$ |
1,811 |
|
|
|
(12 |
)% |
Operating profit |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
(13 |
)% |
Operating margin |
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Sales of the Aerospace segment declined 12% in 2009 compared to 2008. The reduction included 9%
from core sales and 3% from foreign exchange. The decline in core sales was driven by lower sales
in civilian aerospace markets in 2009, partially offset by a slight improvement in defense
aerospace markets.
Operating profit declined 13% in 2009 compared to 2008. The reduction was primarily due to the
decline in sales discussed above, partially offset by net savings resulting from the workforce
reductions and other cost containment actions. Operating profit was reduced by acquisition
integration charges of $12 in 2009 compared to charges of $20 in 2008, which reduced the operating
margin by 0.7% in 2009 and 1.1% in 2008. The acquisition integration charges related to Argo-Tech,
PerkinElmer and Cobham.
Truck
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Decrease |
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,457 |
|
|
$ |
2,251 |
|
|
|
(35 |
)% |
Operating profit |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
(88 |
)% |
Operating margin |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Sales of the Truck segment declined 35% in 2009 compared to 2008. The reduction included 30% from
core sales and 5% from foreign exchange. The decline in core sales resulted from truck markets
being down in all regions in 2009 due to the global economic recession, with the NAFTA Class 8
market at levels not seen since 1991. Orders in the North American Class 8 truck market improved
marginally in the second half of 2009.
Operating profit declined 88% in 2009 compared to 2008. The reduction in operating profit was
primarily due to the significant decline in sales in 2009 discussed above and operating
inefficiencies related to the difficulty in absorbing fixed manufacturing costs resulting from
reduced sales in 2009, partially offset by net savings resulting from the workforce reductions and
other cost containment actions.
Automotive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Decrease |
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,229 |
|
|
$ |
1,871 |
|
|
|
(34 |
)% |
Operating profit (loss) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
59 |
|
|
NM |
|
Operating margin |
|
NM |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Sales of the Automotive segment declined 34% in 2009 compared to 2008. The reduction included 28%
from core sales and 6% from foreign exchange. The decline in core sales was primarily attributable
to a contraction in global automotive end markets that began in 2008 and worsened in 2009 due to
the global economic recession. The automotive market in the U.S. in 2009 was markedly impacted in
the second quarter by the shutdowns at General Motors and Chrysler. Global automotive production
improved in the third quarter of 2009, to a large extent as a result of the governmental stimulus
programs.
Operating losses were $(10) in 2009 compared to operating profit of $59 in 2008. The reduction was
primarily due to the significant decline in sales in 2009 discussed above and operating
inefficiencies related to the difficulty in absorbing fixed manufacturing costs resulting from
reduced sales in 2009,
partially offset by net savings resulting from the workforce reductions and other cost containment
actions.
Page 59
Corporate
Amortization of intangible assets was $170 in 2009 compared to $161 in 2008. The increase was due
to amortization of intangible assets associated with acquired businesses, primarily Moeller and
Phoenixtec.
Corporate pension & other postretirement benefits expense was $212 in 2009 compared to $141 in
2008. The increase was primarily due to pension settlement expense of $86 in 2009, which primarily
resulted from a significant increase in lump sum payments in 2009 before limitations on these
payments went into effect and the workforce reduction in 2009. The increase in expense also
reflected curtailment expense of $22, which resulted from the reduction in workforce in 2009.
Other corporate expense-net was $87 in 2009 compared to $177 in 2008. The decline was primarily
due to the amortization in 2008 of purchase price accounting adjustments related to the fair value
of inventories of businesses acquired in 2008, principally Moeller, and lower corporate expenses in
2009.
LIQUIDITY, CAPITAL RESOURCES & CHANGES IN FINANCIAL CONDITION DURING 2009
Cash Flow & Working Capital
Net cash provided by operating activities was $1,408 in 2009, a slight decline from $1,441 in 2008.
Operating cash flows in 2009 reflected lower net income of $385 in 2009 compared to net income of
$1,070 in 2008, with results for 2009 reflecting the effects of the global economic recession. The
effect of this decline in net income was more than offset by the $944 cash flow resulting from the
net reduction in funding of working capital in 2009 compared to 2008. The reduction in working
capital, primarily accounts receivable and inventory, was due to lower levels of operations
resulting from the global economic recession, and internal efforts to reduce the investment in
working capital. Cash and short-term investments totaled $773 at December 31, 2009, an increase of
$243 from $530 at year-end 2008.
Net working capital of $1,835 at December 31, 2009 rose by $785 from $1,050 at the end of 2008. The
increase was primarily due to the reduction of short-term debt and current portion of long-term
debt by $963 compared to the end of 2008, largely due to the repayment of short-term commercial
paper and current portion of long-term debt as discussed above. Changes in other working capital
included an increase of $243 in cash and short-term investments primarily due to strong cash flow
from operations, reductions of $396 in accounts receivable and $228 in inventories due to lower
sales and internal efforts to reduce the investment in working capital, and a net increase of $203
in other working capital. The current ratio was 1.7 at December 31, 2009, up from 1.3 at year-end
2008.
On a regular basis, Eaton monitors the third-party depository institutions that hold its cash and
short-term investments. Its emphasis is primarily on safety of principal and secondarily on
maximizing yield. Eaton diversifies its cash and short-term investments among counterparties to
minimize exposure to any one of these entities. Eaton also monitors the creditworthiness of its
customers and suppliers to mitigate any adverse impact. Derivative financial instruments used by
Eaton are straightforward and non-leveraged; the counterparties to these instruments are financial
institutions with strong credit ratings. Eaton maintains controls over the size of positions
entered into with any one counterparty and regularly monitors the credit rating of these
institutions.
Capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment were $195, down from $448 in 2008, primarily
due to efforts to conserve cash. Capital expenditures for 2010 are expected to be $400.
Debt & Equity
Total debt of $3,467 at December 31, 2009 declined by $804 from $4,271 at year-end 2008. The
decline was primarily due to a $699 reduction of short-term debt (largely commercial paper) during
2009, and a $264 reduction in current portion of long-term debt due to the repayment of certain
long-term debt that matured during 2009. Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt
were reduced through the use of cash generated from operations and from long-term borrowings. In
2009, Eaton issued $550 of long-term debt through the sale of $250 of 5.95% Notes due 2014 and $300
of 6.95% Notes due 2019, with the cash proceeds from the sale of the Notes used to repay
outstanding short-term commercial paper. The net-debt-to-capital ratio was 28.4% at December 31,
2009 compared to 37.2% at the end of 2008, reflecting the combined effect of the $804 decrease in
total debt, the $243 increase in cash and short-term investments, and the $460 increase in Eaton
shareholders equity. The
increase in equity primarily resulted from net income of $383 and foreign currency translation
adjustments of $349, partially offset by cash dividends paid of $334 and other adjustments.
Page 60
Eaton has long-term revolving credit facilities with United States banks of $1.5 billion, of which
$500 expires in each year from 2011 through 2013. These facilities support Eatons commercial paper
borrowings. There were no borrowings outstanding under these revolving credit facilities at
December 31, 2009. Eatons non-United States operations also had short-term lines of credit of
approximately $680 at December 31, 2009.
Eatons ability to access the commercial paper market, and the related cost of these borrowings, is
due to the strength of its credit rating and overall market conditions. To date, Eaton has not
experienced any material limitations on its ability to access these sources of liquidity. Eaton
maintains $1.5 billion of long-term revolving credit facilities with banks in support of its
commercial paper program, as discussed above.
At December 31, 2009, Eaton was in compliance with all covenants related to its long-term debt
obligations.
Credit Ratings
Eatons credit rating at Standard & Poors is A-/A-2 (long-term rating/short-term rating) and at
Moodys is A3/P-2, both with stable outlooks. Eatons credit rating at Fitch is A-/F2 with a
negative outlook.
Pension Plan Assets
During 2009, the fair value of plan assets in the Companys employee pension plan increased $368 to
$2,042 at December 31, 2009. This was principally the result of increases in the investment values
due to the broad improvement in the global equity markets.
At December 31, 2009, the net unfunded position of $1.568 billion in pension liabilities consisted
of $923 in the U.S. Pension Plan, $84 in all other plans that require minimum funding, ($50) in
plans that are overfunded, and $611 in plans that have no minimum funding requirements.
Funding requirements are a major consideration in making contributions to Eatons pension plans.
With respect to the Companys pension plans worldwide, it intends to contribute annually not less
than the minimum required by applicable laws and regulations. In 2009, $271 was contributed to the
pension plans. The Company contributed $300 to the U.S. Pension Plan in January 2010 and
anticipates making an additional $102 of contributions to all other pension plans during the
remainder of 2010. The funded status of the Companys pension plans at the end of 2010, and future
contributions, will depend primarily on the actual return on assets during the year and the
discount rate used to calculate certain benefits at the end of the year. Depending on these
factors, and the resulting funded status of the pension plans, the level of future contributions
could be materially higher or lower than in 2009.
Meritor Litigation
On October 5, 2006, ZF Meritor LLC and Meritor Transmission Corporation (collectively, Meritor)
filed an action against Eaton in the U.S. District Court for Delaware. The action seeks damages,
which would be trebled under U.S. antitrust laws, as well as injunctive relief and costs. The suit
alleged that Eaton engaged in anti-competitive conduct against Meritor in the sale of heavy duty
truck transmissions in North America. Following a four week trial on liability only, on October 8,
2009, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Meritor. Eaton firmly believes that it competes
fairly and honestly for business in the marketplace, and that at no time did it act in an
anti-competitive manner. During an earlier stage in the case, the judge concluded that damage
estimates contained in a report filed by Meritor were not based on reliable data and the report was
specifically excluded from the case. On November 3, 2009, Eaton filed a motion for judgment as a
matter of law and to set aside the verdict. That motion is currently pending. Accordingly, an
estimate of any potential loss related to this action cannot be made at this time.
OUTLOOK FOR 2010
As of late February, Eaton estimates that its end markets for all of 2010 will grow by between 5% and 6%, and
expects to outgrow end markets in 2010 by approximately $300 in net sales. The Company also
expects approximately $225 of sales growth from foreign exchange in 2010. In total, it is
anticipated that net sales in 2010 will likely grow by approximately 10% compared to 2009.
Page 61
For the Electrical Americas segment, end markets are expected to decline about 3% in 2010.
End markets for the Electrical Rest of World segment are expected to grow about 5% in 2010.
Global hydraulics markets are anticipated to grow about 15% in 2010. End markets in the U.S. are
expected to grow about 15% and non-U.S. markets are expected to grow about 14%.
End markets for the Aerospace segment are expected to decline about 3% in 2010. U.S. markets are
expected to decline about 1%, while non-U.S. markets are expected to decline about 7%.
For the Truck segment, good market growth is expected in 2010, although volumes are likely to still
be at depressed levels. It is anticipated that overall truck markets will grow about 19% in 2010,
with U.S. markets up about 27% and non-U.S. markets up about 10%.
End markets for the Automotive segment are expected to grow about 8% in 2010. Growth is expected
in U.S. Automotive production of about 20% and growth in non-U.S. production of about 2%.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report to Shareholders contains forward-looking statements concerning Eatons full year
2010 sales, the performance in 2010 of its worldwide end markets, and Eatons 2010 growth in
relation to end markets. These statements may discuss goals, intentions and expectations as to
future trends, plans, events, results of operations or financial condition, or state other
information relating to Eaton, based on current beliefs of management as well as assumptions made
by, and information currently available to, management. Forward-looking statements generally will
be accompanied by words such as anticipate, believe, could, estimate, expect, forecast,
guidance, intend, may, possible, potential, predict, project or other similar words,
phrases or expressions. These statements should be used with caution and are subject to various
risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside Eatons control. The following factors could
cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements:
unanticipated changes in the markets for Eatons products; unanticipated downturns in business
relationships with customers or their purchases from the Company; competitive pressures on sales
and pricing; increases in the cost of material and other production costs, or unexpected costs that
cannot be recouped in product pricing; the introduction of competing technologies; unexpected
technical or marketing difficulties; unexpected claims, charges, litigation or dispute resolutions;
the impact of acquisitions and divestitures; unanticipated difficulties integrating acquisitions;
new laws and governmental regulations; interest rate changes; changes in currency exchange rates;
stock market fluctuations; and unanticipated deterioration of economic and financial conditions in
the United States and around the world. Eaton does do not assume any obligation to update these
forward-looking statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States requires Eatons management to make estimates and use assumptions in certain
circumstances that affect amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
In preparing these financial statements, management has made their best estimates and judgments of
certain amounts included in the financial statements, giving due consideration to materiality. For
any estimate or assumption there may be other reasonable estimates or assumptions that could have
been used. However, the Company believes that given the current facts and circumstances, it is
unlikely that applying such other estimates and assumptions would have caused materially different
amounts to have been reported. Application of these accounting policies involves the exercise of
judgment and use of assumptions as to future uncertainties and, as a result, future actual results
could differ from estimates used.
Revenue Recognition
Sales of products are recognized when a sales agreement is in place, products have been shipped to
unaffiliated customers and title has transferred in accordance with shipping terms (FOB shipping
point, FOB destination or equivalent International Commercial (INCO) Terms), the selling price is
fixed and determinable and collectability is reasonably assured, all significant related acts of
performance have been completed, and no other significant uncertainties exist. Shipping and
handling costs billed to customers are included in Net sales and the related costs in Cost of
products sold. Although the majority of the sales agreements contain standard terms and conditions,
there are also agreements that
contain multiple elements or non-standard terms and conditions. As a result, judgement is sometimes
required to determine the appropriate accounting, including whether
Page 62
the deliverables specified in
these agreements should be treated as separate units of accounting for sales recognition purposes,
and, if so, how the sales price should be allocated among the elements and when to recognize sales
for each element. For delivered elements, sales are recognized only when the delivered elements
have standalone value, fair values of undelivered elements are known, there are no uncertainties
regarding customer acceptance and there are no customer-negotiated refund or return rights
affecting the sales recognized for delivered elements. Sales for service contracts are generally
recognized as the services are provided.
Accounts Receivable
The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and maintains sufficient
allowances for potential credit losses. The Company evaluates the collectability of its accounts
receivable based on the length of time the receivable is past due and the anticipated future
write-off based on historic experience. Accounts receivable balances are written off against
allowance for doubtful accounts after a final determination of uncollectibility has been made.
Impairment of Goodwill & Other Long-Lived Assets
Goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets are tested annually for impairment. Further,
goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate there may be a possible permanent loss of value. Eaton
completed
annual impairment tests for goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets as of July 1 of each
year presented using discounted cash flow and other valuation techniques. These tests confirmed
that the fair value of Eatons reporting units and indefinite life intangible assets exceed their
respective carrying values and that no impairment loss was required to be recognized in 2009 or for
any prior periods.
Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level, which is equivalent to Eatons
operating segments, and is based on the net assets for each segment, including goodwill and
intangible assets. Goodwill is assigned to each operating segment as this represents the lowest
level that constitutes a business and for which discrete financial information is available and
segment management regularly reviews the operating results. A discounted cash flow model is used
to estimate the fair value of each operating segment, which considers forecasted cash flows
discounted at an estimated weighted-average cost of capital. The Company selected the discounted
cash flow methodology as it believes that it is comparable to what would be used by other market
participants. The forecasted cash flows are based on the Companys long-term operating plan, and a
terminal value is used to estimate the operating segments cash flows beyond the period covered by
the operating plan. The weighted-average cost of capital is an estimate of the overall after-tax
rate of return required by equity and debt market participants of a business enterprise. These
analyses require the exercise of significant judgments, including judgments about appropriate
discount rates, perpetual growth rates and the timing of expected future cash flows. Discount rate
assumptions are based on an assessment of the risk inherent in the future cash flows of the
respective operating segment. Sensitivity analyses were performed around these assumptions in
order to assess the reasonableness of the assumptions and the resulting estimated fair values.
Based on this test, no reporting unit was at risk of failing the impairment test as of December 31,
2009.
Goodwill and other intangible assets totaled $7.9 billion at the end of 2009 and represented 48% of
total assets. These assets resulted primarily from the $2.1 billion acquisition in 2008 of The
Moeller Group, a leading supplier of electrical components; the $587 acquisition in 2008 of
Phoenixtec, a manufacturer of uninterruptible power supply (UPS) electrical systems; the $614
acquisition in 2007 of the MGE small systems UPS electrical business; the $731 acquisition in 2007
of Argo-Tech, a manufacturer of aerospace, airframe, and ground fueling pumps and systems for
commercial and military aerospace markets; the $573 acquisition in 2004 of Powerware Corporation,
the electrical UPS business; the $1.6 billion acquisition in 1999 of Aeroquip-Vickers, Inc., a
mobile and industrial hydraulics business; and the $1.1 billion acquisition in 1994 of the
electrical distribution and controls business unit of Westinghouse. These businesses have a long
history of operating successfully and profitably and hold significant market positions in the
majority of their product lines. Their products are not subject to rapid technological or
functional obsolescence. These factors support the recognized values of the goodwill and intangible
assets related to acquired businesses.
Long-lived assets, other than goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets, are reviewed for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be
recoverable. Events or circumstances that would result in an impairment review include operations
reporting losses,
a significant adverse change in the use of an asset, the planned disposal or sale of the asset, a
significant adverse change in the business climate or legal factors related to the asset, or a
significant decrease in the estimated fair value of an asset. Upon indications of impairment,
assets are grouped with other assets and
Page 63
liabilities at the lowest level for which identifiable
cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities. The asset
group would be considered impaired when the estimated future net undiscounted cash flows generated
by the asset group are less than its carrying value. In instances where the carrying amount of the
asset group exceeded the undiscounted cash flows, the fair value of the asset group would be
determined and an impairment loss would be recognized based on the amount by which the carrying
value of the asset group exceeds its fair value. Determining asset groups and underlying cash
flows requires the use of significant judgments and estimates.
Recoverability of Deferred Income Tax Assets
Eaton is subject to the income tax laws in the jurisdictions in which it operates. In order to
determine its income tax provision for financial statement purposes, Eaton must make significant
estimates and judgments about its business operations in these jurisdictions. These estimates and
judgments are also used in determining the deferred income tax assets and liabilities that have
been recognized for the differences between the financial accounting and income tax basis of
assets, liabilities, tax loss carryforwards and income tax credit carryforwards.
Management evaluates the realizability of deferred income tax assets for each of the jurisdictions
in which it operates. If the Company experiences cumulative pretax income in a particular
jurisdiction in the three-year period including the current and prior two years, management
normally concludes that the deferred income tax assets will more likely than not be realizable and
no valuation allowance is recognized, unless known or planned operating developments would lead
management to conclude otherwise. However, if the Company experiences cumulative pretax losses in
a particular jurisdiction in the three-year period including the current and prior two years,
management then considers a series of significant factors in the determination of whether the
deferred income tax assets can be realized. The significant factors include historical operating
results, known or planned operating developments, the period of time over which certain temporary
differences will reverse, consideration of the utilization of certain deferred tax liabilities, tax
law carryback capability in the particular country, prudent and feasible tax planning actions, and
estimates of future earnings and taxable income using the same assumptions as the Companys
goodwill and other impairment testing. After evaluation of these factors, if the deferred income
tax assets are expected to be realized within the tax carryforward period allowed for that specific
country, management would conclude that no valuation allowance would be required. To the extent
that the deferred income tax assets exceed the amount that is expected to be realized within the
tax carryforward period for a particular jurisdiction, management would conclude that a valuation
allowance is required.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are described in detail in Income Taxes in the Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements. As of December 31, 2009, U.S. Federal deferred income
tax assets were $1.4 billion. The largest component of the deferred income tax assets is due to the
differing timing of revenue and expense recognition for income tax versus financial statement
purposes. In addition, the Company had a net operating loss in the U.S. in 2009 and possesses
certain income tax credit carryforwards that comprise the remainder of the balance. Over the 20
year carryforward period available for net operating losses and general business credits, taxable
income of approximately $4.0 billion would need to be realized to utilize all deferred income tax
assets. After applying the methodology described above, as of December 31, 2009, management
believes that it is more likely than not that the entire U.S. Federal deferred income tax assets
will be realized. Accordingly, the Company has not established a valuation allowance on its U.S.
Federal deferred income tax assets.
Applying the above methodology, valuation allowances have been established for certain U.S. state
and local income as well as certain non-U.S. deferred income tax assets to the extent they are not
expected to be realized within the particular tax carryforward period.
Pension & Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
The measurement of liabilities related to pension plans and other postretirement benefits plans is
based on managements assumptions related to future events including interest rates, return on
pension plan assets, rate of compensation increases, and health care cost trend rates. Actual
pension plan asset performance will either reduce or increase pension losses included in
accumulated other comprehensive loss, which ultimately affects net income.
Page 64
The discount rate for United States plans was determined by constructing a zero-coupon spot yield
curve derived from a universe of high-quality bonds as of the measurement date, which was designed
to match the discounted expected benefit payments. Only bonds rated Aa3 or better by Moodys
Investor Services were included. Callable bonds with explicit call schedules were excluded but
bonds with make-whole call provisions were included. Finally, a subset of bonds was selected by
grouping the universe of bonds by duration and retaining 50% of the bonds that had the highest
yields.
The discount rates for non-United States plans are appropriate for each region and are based on
high-quality long-term corporate and government bonds. Consideration has been given to the
duration of the liabilities in each plan for selecting the bonds to be used in determining the
discount rate.
Key assumptions used to calculate pension and other postretirement benefits expense are adjusted at
each year end. A 1-percentage point change in the assumed rate of return on pension plan assets is
estimated to have approximately a $24 effect on pension expense. Likewise, a 1-percentage point
change in the discount rate is estimated to have approximately a $37 effect on pension expense. A
1-percentage point change in the discount rate is estimated to have approximately a $3 effect on
expense for other postretirement benefits plans. Additional information related to changes in key
assumptions used to recognize expense for other postretirement benefits plans is found in
Retirement Benefits Plans in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Fair Value
In determining fair value, Eaton uses various valuation techniques and prioritizes the use of
observable inputs. The availability of observable inputs varies from instrument to instrument and
depends on a variety of factors including the type of instrument, whether the instrument is
actively traded and other characteristics specific to the instrument. Eaton assesses the inputs
used to measure fair value using a three-tier hierarchy based on the extent to which inputs used in
measuring fair value are observable in the market. Level 1 inputs include quoted prices in active
markets for identical instruments. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices in active markets for
similar instruments. Level 3 inputs are not observable in the market and include managements
judgments about the assumptions market participants would use in the
pricing of the asset or
liability. The use of inputs is reflected in the hierarchy assessment disclosed in Retirement
Benefits Plans and Financial Assets & Liabilities Measured at Fair Value in the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements. Eatons fair value processes include controls that are designed
to ensure that fair values are appropriate. Such controls include model valuation, review of key
inputs, analysis of fluctuations between periods, and reviews by senior management.
Protection of the Environment
As a result of past operations, Eaton is involved in remedial response and voluntary environmental
remediation at a number of sites, including certain of its currently-owned or formerly-owned
plants. The Company has also been named a potentially responsible party (PRP) under the Federal
Superfund law at a number of disposal sites.
A number of factors affect the cost of environmental remediation, including the number of parties
involved at a particular site, the determination of the extent of contamination, the length of time
the remediation may require, the complexity of environmental regulations, and the continuing
advancement of remediation technology. Taking these factors into account, Eaton has estimated the
costs of remediation, which will be incurred over a period of years. The Company accrues an amount
on an undiscounted basis, consistent with the estimates of these costs, when it is probable that a
liability has been incurred. At December 31, 2009, the balance sheet included a liability for these
costs of $80. All of these estimates are forward-looking statements and, given the inherent
uncertainties in evaluating environmental exposures, actual results can differ from these
estimates.
Contingencies
Eaton is subject to a broad range of claims, administrative proceedings, and legal proceedings,
such as lawsuits that relate to contractual allegations, patent infringement, personal injuries
(including asbestos claims), antitrust matters and employment-related matters. Although it is not possible to
predict with certainty the outcome or cost of these matters, the Company believes that these
matters will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
Page 65
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Eaton does not have off-balance sheet arrangements or financings with unconsolidated entities or
other persons. In the ordinary course of business, the Company leases certain real properties and
equipment, as described in Lease Commitments in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
MARKET RISK DISCLOSURE
Eaton is exposed to various changes in financial market conditions, including fluctuations in
interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and commodity prices. The Company manages exposure
to such risks through normal operating and financing activities.
Eaton monitors the third-party depository institutions that hold its cash and short-term
investments on a regular basis. Its emphasis is primarily on safety of principal and secondarily on
maximizing yield on those funds. The Company diversifies its cash and short-term investments among
counterparties to minimize exposure to any one of these entities. It also monitors the
creditworthiness of its customers and suppliers to mitigate any adverse impact on Eaton.
Derivative financial instruments used by Eaton to manage exposures to financial risks are
straightforward, non-leveraged instruments. The counterparties to these instruments are financial
institutions with strong credit ratings. The Company maintains controls over the size of positions
entered into with any one counterparty and regularly monitors the credit rating of these
institutions.
Eatons ability to access the commercial paper market, and the related cost of these borrowings, is
related to the strength of its credit rating and overall market conditions. To date, the Company
has not experienced any material limitations in its ability to access these sources of liquidity.
At December 31, 2009, Eaton had $1.5 billion of long-term revolving credit facilities with banks in
support of its commercial paper program, as discussed above. It has no direct borrowings
outstanding under these credit facilities. Eatons non-United States operations also had
short-term lines of credit of approximately $680 at December 31, 2009.
Interest rate risk can be measured by calculating the near-term earnings impact that would result
from adverse changes in interest rates. This exposure results from short-term debt, which includes
commercial paper at a floating interest rate, long-term debt that has been swapped to floating
rates, and money market investments that have not been swapped to fixed rates. Based upon the
balances of investments and floating rate debt at year end 2009, a 100 basis point increase in
short-term interest rates would have a negligible effect on the Companys net, pretax interest
expense.
Eaton also measures interest rate risk by estimating the net amount by which the fair value of the
Companys financial liabilities would change as a result of movements in interest rates. Based on
Eatons best estimate for a hypothetical, immediate 100 basis point decrease in interest rates at
December 31, 2009, the market value of the Companys debt and interest rate swap portfolio, in
aggregate, would increase by $210.
Foreign currency risk is the risk that Eaton will incur economic losses due to adverse changes in
foreign currency exchange rates. The Company mitigates foreign currency risk by funding some
investments in foreign markets through local currency financings. Such non-U.S. dollar debt was
$151 at December 31, 2009. To augment Eatons non-U.S. dollar debt portfolio, the Company also
enters into forward foreign exchange contracts and foreign currency swaps from time to time to
mitigate the risk of economic loss in its foreign investments due to adverse changes in exchange
rates. At December 31, 2009, the aggregate balance of such contracts was $573. Eaton also monitors
exposure to transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of each
country in which the Company operates, and regularly enters into forward contracts to mitigate that
exposure. In the aggregate, Eatons portfolio of forward contracts related to such transactions was
not material to its financial position, results of operations or cash flows during 2009.
Other than the above noted debt and financial derivative arrangements, there were no material
derivative instrument transactions in place or undertaken during 2009.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
A summary of contractual obligations as of December 31, 2009 follows:
Page 66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to |
|
|
to |
|
|
After |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
Total |
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
318 |
|
|
$ |
568 |
|
|
$ |
2,463 |
|
|
$ |
3,354 |
|
Interest expense related to
long-term debt |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
1,245 |
|
|
|
2,118 |
|
Reduction of interest
expense from interest
rate
swap agreements related
to long-term debt |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(166 |
) |
Operating leases |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
Purchase obligations |
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
1,516 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,586 |
|
|
$ |
1,352 |
|
|
$ |
1,030 |
|
|
$ |
3,753 |
|
|
$ |
7,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt includes obligations under capital leases, which are not material. Interest expense
related to long-term debt is based on the fixed interest rate, or other applicable interest rate
related to the debt instrument, at December 31, 2009. The reduction of interest expense due to
interest rate swap agreements related to long-term debt is based on the difference in the fixed
interest rate the Company receives from the swap, compared to the floating interest rate the
Company pays on the swap, at December 31, 2009. Purchase obligations are entered into with various
vendors in the normal course of business. These amounts include commitments for purchases of raw
materials, outstanding non-cancelable purchase orders, releases under blanket purchase orders and
commitments under ongoing service arrangements. Other long-term liabilities include $402 of
contributions to pension plans in 2010 and $90 of deferred compensation earned under various plans
for which the participants have elected to receive disbursement at a later date. The table above
does not include future expected pension benefit payments or expected other postretirement benefit
payments for each of the next five years and the five years thereafter. Information related to the
amounts of these future payments is described in Retirement
Benefits Plans in the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements. The table above also excludes the liability for unrecognized
income tax benefits, since the Company cannot predict with reasonable reliability the timing of
cash settlements with the respective taxing authorities. At December 31, 2009, the gross liability
for unrecognized income tax benefits totaled $197, including interest and penalties of $43.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 2008 COMPARED TO 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
15,376 |
|
|
$ |
13,033 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
|
4,185 |
|
|
|
3,651 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Percent of net sales |
|
|
27.2 |
% |
|
|
28.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
Income after income taxes |
|
$ |
1,067 |
|
|
$ |
973 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
1,008 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Adjustment of net income for noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
|
$ |
994 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share - diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
6.50 |
|
|
$ |
6.38 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
.02 |
|
|
|
.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6.52 |
|
|
$ |
6.62 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding - diluted (in millions) |
|
|
162.3 |
|
|
|
150.3 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
Sales growth of 18% in 2008 over 2007 consisted of 14% from acquisitions of businesses, 3% from
organic growth, and 1% from foreign exchange. Acquisitions of businesses were primarily the Moeller
electrical business, acquired in April 2008; the Phoenixtec electrical business, acquired in
February 2008; and the MGE small systems UPS electrical business, acquired in October 2007, all of
which were
included in the Electrical Rest of World segment, along with the Argo-Tech aerospace business,
acquired in March 2007.
Page 67
Gross profit increased 15% in 2008 over 2007. This increase was primarily due to sales growth of
18%, which included sales of acquired businesses; the benefits of integrating acquired businesses;
and continued productivity improvements driven by the Eaton Business System (EBS). These increases
in gross profit were partially offset by the impact of rising prices for raw materials, supplies
and other commodities, and expense of $27 related to the closing in 2008 of the automotive engine
valve lifters manufacturing plant in Massa, Italy.
Net Sales by Geographic Region
Net sales are measured based on the geographic location of the selling plant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Increase |
United States |
|
$ |
8,775 |
|
|
$ |
8,556 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Canada |
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Latin America |
|
|
1,455 |
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
Europe |
|
|
4,002 |
|
|
|
2,624 |
|
|
|
53 |
% |
Asia Pacific |
|
|
1,963 |
|
|
|
1,144 |
|
|
|
72 |
% |
Eliminations |
|
|
(1,247 |
) |
|
|
(908 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,376 |
|
|
$ |
13,033 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the United States, sales increased 3% in 2008 compared to 2007. Sales growth was primarily due
to growth in the Electrical Americas, Aerospace and Hydraulics segments, as well as the
acquisitions in 2007 of Argo-Tech aerospace and other businesses. These increases were partially
offset by reduced sales in the Automotive segment due to the sharp decline in the North American
automotive market during 2008, and reduced sales of the Truck segment.
Sales growth in Canada of 15% in 2008 over 2007 was primarily due to higher sales in the Electrical
Americas segment resulting from growth in end markets and from acquired businesses.
In Latin America, sales growth of 17% in 2008 over 2007 was largely due to the Truck, Electrical
Americas and Hydraulics segments, primarily due to growth in end markets.
Sales growth in Europe of 53% in 2008 over 2007 was primarily due to higher sales in the Electrical
Rest of World segment, which was largely due to the acquisitions of Moeller in 2008 and the MGE
small systems UPS business in 2007, as well as growth in end markets. Sales growth was also due to
increased sales in the Aerospace, Hydraulics, Truck and Automotive segments largely due to growth
in end markets.
Sales growth in Asia Pacific of 72% in 2008 over 2007 was primarily due to the acquisition of the
Phoenixtec electrical business in 2008 and higher sales in the Electrical Rest of World,
Hydraulics, Automotive and Truck segments, mainly resulting from growth in end markets.
Other Results of Operations
In 2008 and 2007, Eaton incurred charges related to the integration of acquired businesses. These
charges, which consisted of plant consolidations and integration, were recognized as expense as
incurred. A summary of these charges follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Electrical Americas |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Rest of World |
|
|
43 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
Hydraulics |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Aerospace |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Automotive |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax charges |
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After-tax charges |
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
Per common share |
|
$ |
.31 |
|
|
$ |
.28 |
|
Page 68
Charges in 2008 were related primarily to the integration of the following acquisitions: Kirloskar,
Moeller, Phoenixtec, the MGE small systems UPS business, Saturn, Argo-Tech, Ronningen-Petter,
Synflex, PerkinElmer and Cobham. Charges in 2007 were related primarily to the integration of the
following acquisitions: the MGE small systems UPS business, Saturn, Argo-Tech, Schreder-Hazemeyer,
Senyuan, Synflex, PerkinElmer, Cobham, Powerware, Hayward, and Walterscheid. These charges were
included in the Statements of Consolidated Income in Cost of products sold or Selling &
administrative expense, as appropriate. In Business Segment Information, the charges reduced
Operating profit of the related segment.
In 2008, Eaton announced the closure of its automotive engine valve lifters manufacturing plant in
Massa, Italy. There were 350 employees affected by the closure decision. The action was taken to
better align manufacturing capacity with future industry demand and to improve the competitive
position of the valve actuation business. Aggregate pretax charges associated with this closure
were $27, which were recognized in 2008, when management approved this action. These costs, which
consisted of charges of $17 for severance, $7 for the write-down of assets and $3 for other costs,
reduced operating profit of the Automotive segment.
In 2008 and 2007, Eaton recognized income tax benefits of $108 and $57, respectively, which
represented adjustments to worldwide tax liabilities and valuation allowances. The 2008 income tax
benefits reduced the effective income tax rate for 2008 from 15.9% to 6.4%. The 2008 benefits
resulted from multiple income tax items including a benefit of $44 related to the consolidation of
various legal entities and the recognition of $25 of tax credits related to the transfer of certain
international operations. The 2007 income tax benefits reduced the effective income tax rate for
2007 from 13.2% to 7.8%. The 2007 income tax benefits resulted from multiple income tax items,
including a $14 benefit from changes to state tax laws and a favorable revaluation of worldwide
deferred tax assets. Further analysis regarding the change in the effective income tax rate in 2008
compared to 2007 is found in Income Taxes in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Net income of $1,058 in 2008 increased 6% over 2007. The increase was primarily due to higher sales
and the other factors that affected gross profit discussed above, along with lower income taxes.
These increases were partially offset by increases in selling, administrative, research and
development, and interest expenses resulting from the inclusions of Moeller and Phoenixtec, and
higher levels of expenses to support sales from existing operations. In addition, a $20 after-tax
gain on the sale of the Mirror Controls business was included in Income from discontinued
operations in 2007 that was not present in 2008. Net income per common share of $6.52 in 2008
decreased 1% from 2007 due to the factors that resulted in increased net income discussed above,
offset by the increase in average shares outstanding resulting from the sale of 18.678 million
common shares in a public offering in 2008.
RESULTS BY BUSINESS SEGMENT
Electrical Americas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Increase |
Net sales |
|
$ |
4,016 |
|
|
$ |
3,601 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Operating profit |
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
Operating margin |
|
|
15.7 |
% |
|
|
14.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
The 12% increase in sales in 2008 over 2007 for the Electrical Americas segment consisted of 1%
from acquisitions of businesses and 11% from organic growth. End markets for the Electrical
Americas segment were adversely affected by the global economic recession in the second half of
2008, although nonresidential construction spending in the United States held up well in 2008.
Operating profit rose 18% in 2008 over 2007, and operating margin rose to 15.7%. The increase in
operating profit was largely due to growth in sales and continued productivity improvements.
Operating profit was reduced by acquisition integration charges of $4 in 2008 compared to no
charges in 2007, which reduced the operating margin by 0.1% in 2008. The incremental operating
margin for 2008 (the increase in operating profit compared to the increase in sales) was 23%.
Electrical Rest of World
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Increase |
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,904 |
|
|
$ |
1,158 |
|
|
|
151 |
% |
Operating profit |
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
418 |
% |
Operating margin |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Page 69
The 151% increase in sales in 2008 over 2007 for the Electrical Rest of World segment consisted of
150% from acquisitions of businesses, primarily Moeller, Phoenixtec and the MGE small systems UPS
business, and 2% from organic growth, partially offset by a 1% decline in foreign exchange. End
market growth for the Electrical Rest of World segment slowed in the second half of 2008 reflecting
the global economic recession.
Operating profit rose 418% in 2008 over 2007, and operating margin rose to 8.0%. The increase in
operating profit was largely due to results of acquired businesses, other growth in sales and
continued productivity improvements. Operating profit was reduced by acquisition integration
charges of $43 in 2008 compared to charges of $12 in 2007, which reduced the operating margin by
1.5% and 1.0% in 2008 and 2007, respectively. Acquisition integration charges in 2008 primarily
related to Moeller, Phoenixtec and the MGE small systems UPS business. Charges in 2007 related to
MGE small systems UPS business, Schreder-Hazemeyer, Senyuan and Powerware. The incremental
operating margin for 2008 (the increase in operating profit compared to the increase in sales) was
11%. The operating margin for acquired businesses for 2008 was 14%.
Businesses acquired during 2008 in the Electrical Rest of World segment included the following:
|
|
On July 31, 2008, PK Electronics, a Belgium-based distributor and service provider of
single phase and three-phase uninterruptible power supply (UPS) systems, was acquired. This
business had sales of $9 for 2007. |
|
|
|
On April 4, 2008, The Moeller Group, a Germany-based business which is a leading supplier
of electrical components for commercial and residential building applications and industrial
controls for industrial equipment applications, was acquired. This business had sales of
1.02 billion for 2007. |
|
|
|
On March 31, 2008, Balmen Electronic, S.L., a Spain-based distributor and service provider
of uninterruptible power supply (UPS) systems, was acquired. This business had sales of $6 for
2007. |
|
|
|
On February 26, 2008, Phoenixtec Power Company Ltd., a Taiwan-based manufacturer of single
and three-phase uninterruptible power supply (UPS) systems, was acquired. This business had
sales of $515 for 2007. |
Hydraulics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Increase |
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,523 |
|
|
$ |
2,391 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Operating profit |
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
Operating margin |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
The 6% increase in sales in 2008 over 2007 for the Hydraulics segment consisted of 3% from foreign
exchange, 2% from organic growth and 1% from acquisitions of businesses. Global hydraulics end
markets were stronger in the early part of 2008 led by growth in Asia Pacific markets. However,
global hydraulics markets declined markedly in the fourth quarter of 2008, led by steep production
cutbacks by customers around the world.
Operating profit rose 8% in 2008 over 2007, and operating margin increased to 11.3%. The increase
in operating profit was due to growth in sales, the benefits of integrating acquired businesses,
and an overall improvement in operating efficiencies. Operating profit was reduced by acquisition
integration charges of $6 in 2008 compared to charges of $12 in 2007, which reduced the operating
margin by 0.2% and 0.5% in 2008 and 2007, respectively. Acquisition integration charges in 2008
primarily related to Ronningen-Petter and Synflex. Charges in 2007 largely related to Synflex,
Hayward and Walterscheid. The incremental operating margin for 2008 was 15%.
On October 2, 2008, Integ Holdings Limited, the parent company of Integrated Hydraulics Ltd., a
U.K.-based manufacturer of screw-in cartridge valves, custom-engineered hydraulic valves and
manifold systems, was acquired. The business had sales of $52 in 2007.
Page 70
Aerospace
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
Increase |
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,811 |
|
|
$ |
1,594 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Operating profit |
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
Operating margin |
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
14.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
The 14% increase in sales in 2008 over 2007 for the Aerospace segment consisted of 13% from organic
growth and 2% from acquisitions of businesses, partially offset by a decrease of 1% from foreign
exchange. Aerospace end market growth in 2008 was led by non-U.S markets, driven by strong
deliveries from Airbus, while U.S. markets were flat, due to a decline in deliveries of new
aircraft from Boeing as a result of a strike at its manufacturing operations.
Operating profit rose 21% in 2008 over 2007. The increase in operating profit was due to growth in
sales, the benefits of integrating acquired businesses, and an overall improvement in operating
efficiencies. Operating profit was reduced by acquisition integration charges of $20 in 2008
compared to charges of $39 in 2007, which reduced the operating margin by 1.1% and 2.4% in 2008 and
2007, respectively. Acquisition integration charges in 2008 and 2007 primarily related to
Argo-Tech, PerkinElmer and Cobham. Despite inefficiencies incurred as a result of the Boeing
strike, this segment earned a 15.6% operating margin in 2008. The incremental operating margin for
2008 was 23%.
Truck
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Increase
(Decrease) |
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,251 |
|
|
$ |
2,147 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Operating profit |
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
(12 |
)% |
Operating margin |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
16.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Sales of the Truck segment increased 5% in 2008 over 2007. The increase consisted of 2% from
organic growth and 3% from foreign exchange. End markets were mixed in 2008, with U.S. markets
broadly lower, while certain international markets grew.
Operating profit of $315 in 2008 was 12% lower than 2007, primarily due to operating inefficiencies
related to the inability to absorb fixed manufacturing costs resulting from volatile end markets.
In spite of end markets for the Truck segment that performed unevenly in 2008, this segment
achieved an operating margin of 14.0% in 2008.
Automotive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Decrease |
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,871 |
|
|
$ |
2,142 |
|
|
|
(13 |
)% |
Operating profit |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
(75 |
)% |
Operating margin |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
The 13% decrease in sales of the Automotive segment in 2008 from 2007 reflected a 15% decrease in
sales volume, partially offset by a 2% increase from foreign exchange. In 2008, global automotive
markets declined. U.S. markets led the decline, which was partially offset by growth in Asia
Pacific and Latin America markets. The North American markets were weak throughout 2008, and
Europe, Brazil and China also weakened dramatically during the year. In addition, the strike at a
major U.S. automotive supplier was not fully resolved until very late in the second quarter of
2008, further reducing automotive production in the U.S. in 2008. Additionally, due to the economic
downturn in the fourth quarter of 2008, automotive markets dropped sharply around the world, with
automotive unit production in the fourth quarter declining significantly.
Operating profit decreased 75% in 2008 from 2007, largely due to the decline in sales volume and
changes in product mix. The sharp slowdown in end markets in 2008, as well as continued shifts in
mix to smaller vehicles in the U.S., resulted in the inability of this business to absorb fixed
manufacturing costs, which severely impacted operating profit. The sudden drop in sales volume
during the fourth quarter of 2008 created significant additional manufacturing inefficiencies and
necessitated significant reductions in personnel. In addition, an action was taken in 2008 to close
the Massa, Italy, valve actuation plant, which resulted in a charge of $27. Operating profit was
also reduced by acquisition integration charges of $3 in 2008 as compared to $1 in 2007, which
reduced operating margin by 0.2% in 2008 and 0.1% in 2007. Acquisition integration charges in 2008
related to Saturn and the engine valve business of Kirloskar Oil Engines Ltd. Charges in 2007
related to Saturn.
Page 71
On October 1, 2008, Nittan Global Tech Co. Ltd., a joint venture, became operational. The new joint
venture will manage the global design, manufacture and supply of engine valves and valve actuation
products to Japanese and Korean automobile and engine manufacturers. In addition, during the second
half of 2008, several related manufacturing joint ventures were established.
On July 31, 2008, the engine valves business of Kirloskar Oil Engines Ltd. was acquired. This
India-based company, which had sales of $5 in 2007, designs, manufacturers and sells intake and
exhaust valves for diesel and gasoline engines.
Corporate
Amortization of intangible assets was $161 in 2008 compared to $79 in 2007. The increase reflected
amortization of intangible assets associated with recently acquired businesses, primarily the
Moeller, Phoenixtec and MGE small systems UPS electrical businesses.
Interest expense was $157 in 2008 compared to $147 in 2007. The increase was primarily due to
borrowings to finance recently acquired businesses, primarily the Moeller, Phoenixtec, MGE small
systems UPS electrical businesses, and Argo-Tech.
Corporate pension & other postretirement benefit expense was $141 in 2008 compared to $164 in 2007.
The decrease was primarily due to the effect of updated actuarial assumptions.
Page 72
QUARTERLY DATA (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended in 2009 |
|
|
Quarter ended in 2008 |
|
(Millions except for per share data) |
|
Dec. 31 |
|
|
Sept. 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
Mar. 31 |
|
|
Dec. 31 |
|
|
Sept. 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
Mar. 31 |
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
3,131 |
|
|
$ |
3,028 |
|
|
$ |
2,901 |
|
|
$ |
2,813 |
|
|
$ |
3,487 |
|
|
$ |
4,114 |
|
|
$ |
4,279 |
|
|
$ |
3,496 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
861 |
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
1,210 |
|
|
|
964 |
|
Percent of net sales |
|
|
28.4 |
% |
|
|
28.1 |
% |
|
|
24.5 |
% |
|
|
22.7 |
% |
|
|
24.7 |
% |
|
|
28.0 |
% |
|
|
28.3 |
% |
|
|
27.6 |
% |
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
Income (loss) after income taxes |
|
$ |
212 |
|
|
$ |
194 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
(52 |
) |
|
$ |
165 |
|
|
$ |
318 |
|
|
$ |
337 |
|
|
$ |
247 |
|
Income from discontinued operation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
Adjustment of net income (loss) for
noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
211 |
|
|
$ |
193 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
(50 |
) |
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
$ |
315 |
|
|
$ |
333 |
|
|
$ |
247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share - diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.25 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
.17 |
|
|
$ |
(.30 |
) |
|
$ |
.98 |
|
|
$ |
1.87 |
|
|
$ |
2.03 |
|
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1.25 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
.17 |
|
|
$ |
(.30 |
) |
|
$ |
.98 |
|
|
$ |
1.87 |
|
|
$ |
2.03 |
|
|
$ |
1.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share - basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
$ |
.17 |
|
|
$ |
(.30 |
) |
|
$ |
.98 |
|
|
$ |
1.90 |
|
|
$ |
2.07 |
|
|
$ |
1.65 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
$ |
.17 |
|
|
$ |
(.30 |
) |
|
$ |
.98 |
|
|
$ |
1.90 |
|
|
$ |
2.07 |
|
|
$ |
1.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid per common share |
|
$ |
.50 |
|
|
$ |
.50 |
|
|
$ |
.50 |
|
|
$ |
.50 |
|
|
$ |
.50 |
|
|
$ |
.50 |
|
|
$ |
.50 |
|
|
$ |
.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market price per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$ |
67.06 |
|
|
$ |
60.65 |
|
|
$ |
49.75 |
|
|
$ |
53.34 |
|
|
$ |
54.58 |
|
|
$ |
84.33 |
|
|
$ |
96.69 |
|
|
$ |
96.18 |
|
Low |
|
|
53.95 |
|
|
|
40.28 |
|
|
|
36.04 |
|
|
|
30.02 |
|
|
|
38.78 |
|
|
|
53.77 |
|
|
|
78.94 |
|
|
|
77.55 |
|
|
Earnings per common share for the four quarters in a year may not equal full year earnings per share. |
|
Significant non-recurring adjustments included in income (loss) before income taxes are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce reduction charges |
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
$ |
(22 |
) |
|
$ |
(69 |
) |
|
$ |
(65 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition integration charges |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
Plant closing charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 73
TEN-YEAR CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL SUMMARY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Millions except for per share data) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2000 |
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
11,873 |
|
|
$ |
15,376 |
|
|
$ |
13,033 |
|
|
$ |
12,232 |
|
|
$ |
10,874 |
|
|
$ |
9,547 |
|
|
$ |
7,796 |
|
|
$ |
6,983 |
|
|
$ |
7,092 |
|
|
$ |
8,103 |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
|
979 |
|
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
Income after income taxes |
|
$ |
385 |
|
|
$ |
1,067 |
|
|
$ |
973 |
|
|
$ |
907 |
|
|
$ |
788 |
|
|
$ |
633 |
|
|
$ |
368 |
|
|
$ |
272 |
|
|
$ |
158 |
|
|
$ |
350 |
|
Percent of net sales |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
1,008 |
|
|
|
960 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
Adjustment of net income for
noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to
common shareholders |
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
|
$ |
994 |
|
|
$ |
950 |
|
|
$ |
805 |
|
|
$ |
648 |
|
|
$ |
386 |
|
|
$ |
281 |
|
|
$ |
169 |
|
|
$ |
453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share - diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
|
$ |
6.50 |
|
|
$ |
6.38 |
|
|
$ |
5.87 |
|
|
$ |
5.08 |
|
|
$ |
3.99 |
|
|
$ |
2.36 |
|
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
|
$ |
2.36 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.02 |
|
|
|
.24 |
|
|
|
.35 |
|
|
|
.15 |
|
|
|
.14 |
|
|
|
.20 |
|
|
|
.16 |
|
|
|
.13 |
|
|
|
.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
|
$ |
6.52 |
|
|
$ |
6.62 |
|
|
$ |
6.22 |
|
|
$ |
5.23 |
|
|
$ |
4.13 |
|
|
$ |
2.56 |
|
|
$ |
1.96 |
|
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
$ |
3.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of common shares
outstanding - diluted |
|
|
167.9 |
|
|
|
162.3 |
|
|
|
150.3 |
|
|
|
152.9 |
|
|
|
154.0 |
|
|
|
157.1 |
|
|
|
150.5 |
|
|
|
143.4 |
|
|
|
141.0 |
|
|
|
145.2 |
|
Net income per common share - basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
2.31 |
|
|
$ |
6.58 |
|
|
$ |
6.51 |
|
|
$ |
5.97 |
|
|
$ |
5.21 |
|
|
$ |
4.10 |
|
|
$ |
2.40 |
|
|
$ |
1.82 |
|
|
$ |
1.08 |
|
|
$ |
2.39 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.02 |
|
|
|
.24 |
|
|
|
.35 |
|
|
|
.15 |
|
|
|
.14 |
|
|
|
.21 |
|
|
|
.17 |
|
|
|
.14 |
|
|
|
.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2.31 |
|
|
$ |
6.60 |
|
|
$ |
6.75 |
|
|
$ |
6.32 |
|
|
$ |
5.36 |
|
|
$ |
4.24 |
|
|
$ |
2.61 |
|
|
$ |
1.99 |
|
|
$ |
1.22 |
|
|
$ |
3.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of common shares
outstanding - basic |
|
|
166.4 |
|
|
|
160.2 |
|
|
|
147.3 |
|
|
|
150.2 |
|
|
|
150.2 |
|
|
|
153.1 |
|
|
|
147.9 |
|
|
|
141.2 |
|
|
|
138.8 |
|
|
|
143.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid per common share |
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
|
$ |
1.72 |
|
|
$ |
1.48 |
|
|
$ |
1.24 |
|
|
$ |
1.08 |
|
|
$ |
.92 |
|
|
$ |
.88 |
|
|
$ |
.88 |
|
|
$ |
.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
16,282 |
|
|
$ |
16,655 |
|
|
$ |
13,430 |
|
|
$ |
11,417 |
|
|
$ |
10,218 |
|
|
$ |
9,075 |
|
|
$ |
8,223 |
|
|
$ |
7,138 |
|
|
$ |
7,646 |
|
|
$ |
8,180 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
3,349 |
|
|
|
3,190 |
|
|
|
2,432 |
|
|
|
1,774 |
|
|
|
1,830 |
|
|
|
1,734 |
|
|
|
1,651 |
|
|
|
1,887 |
|
|
|
2,252 |
|
|
|
2,447 |
|
Total debt |
|
|
3,467 |
|
|
|
4,271 |
|
|
|
3,417 |
|
|
|
2,586 |
|
|
|
2,464 |
|
|
|
1,773 |
|
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
2,088 |
|
|
|
2,440 |
|
|
|
3,004 |
|
Eaton shareholders equity |
|
|
6,777 |
|
|
|
6,317 |
|
|
|
5,172 |
|
|
|
4,106 |
|
|
|
3,778 |
|
|
|
3,606 |
|
|
|
3,117 |
|
|
|
2,302 |
|
|
|
2,475 |
|
|
|
2,410 |
|
Eaton shareholders equity per
common share |
|
$ |
40.78 |
|
|
$ |
38.28 |
|
|
$ |
35.42 |
|
|
$ |
28.07 |
|
|
$ |
25.44 |
|
|
$ |
23.52 |
|
|
$ |
20.37 |
|
|
$ |
16.30 |
|
|
$ |
17.80 |
|
|
$ |
17.64 |
|
Common shares outstanding |
|
|
166.2 |
|
|
|
165.0 |
|
|
|
146.0 |
|
|
|
146.3 |
|
|
|
148.5 |
|
|
|
153.3 |
|
|
|
153.0 |
|
|
|
141.2 |
|
|
|
139.0 |
|
|
|
136.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 74
Eaton Corporation
2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K
Exhibit Index
3 |
(i) |
|
Amended Articles of Incorporation (amended and restated as of April 24,
2008) - Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-Q Report for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 |
|
3 |
(ii) |
|
Amended Regulations (amended and restated as of April 23, 2008) -
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-Q Report for the three months ended March 31,
2008 |
|
4 |
(a) |
|
Pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 601(b) (4), the Company agrees to furnish
to the SEC, upon request, a copy of the instruments defining the rights of holders of
its other long-term debt |
|
10 |
|
|
Material contracts |
|
(a) |
|
Senior Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (effective January 1,
2008) - Incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement
dated March 14, 2008 |
|
|
(b) |
|
Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (effective January 1, 2005) -
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
(c) |
|
2005 Non-Employee Director Fee Deferral Plan (2008 restatement) -
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(d) |
|
Deferred Incentive Compensation Plan II (2008 restatement) -
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(e) |
|
Excess Benefits Plan II (2008 restatement) - Incorporated by
reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31,
2007 |
|
|
(f) |
|
Incentive Compensation Deferral Plan II (2008 restatement) -
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(g) |
|
Limited Eaton Service Supplemental Retirement Income Plan II (2008
restatement) - Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for
the year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(h) |
|
Supplemental Benefits Plan II (2008 restatement) - Incorporated by
reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31,
2007 |
|
|
(i) |
|
Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreement (2 year vesting) -
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(j) |
|
Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreement (4 year vesting) -
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(k) |
|
Form of Restricted Share Agreement (2 year vesting) - Incorporated by
reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31,
2007 |
|
|
(l) |
|
Form of Restricted Share Agreement (4 year vesting) - Incorporated by
reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31,
2007 |
|
|
(m) |
|
Form of Restricted Share Agreement (Non-Employee Directors) -
Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Report filed February 1,
2010 |
|
|
(n) |
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for Executives (2008) - Incorporated
by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31,
2007 |
Page 75
|
(o) |
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for Executives - Incorporated by
reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31,
2006 |
|
|
(p) |
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for Non-Employee Directors (2008) -
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(q) |
|
2002 Stock Plan - Incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy
Statement dated March 15, 2002 |
|
|
(r) |
|
2004 Stock Plan - Incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy
Statement dated March 19, 2004 |
|
|
(s) |
|
2008 Stock Plan - Incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy
Statement dated March 14, 2008 |
|
|
(t) |
|
2009 Stock Plan - Incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy
Statement dated March 13, 2009 |
|
|
(u) |
|
Plan for the Deferred Payment of Directors Fees (originally adopted
in 1985 and amended effective September 24, 1996, January 28, 1998,
January 23, 2002, February 24, 2004, December 8, 2004 and, in certain
respects, January 1, 2005) - Incorporated by reference to the Form
10-K Report for the year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(v) |
|
1996 Non-Employee Director Fee Deferral Plan (amended and restated
effective January 1, 2005) - Incorporated by reference to the Form
10-K Report for the year ended December 31, 2006 |
|
|
(w) |
|
Form of Change of Control Agreement entered into with officers of
Eaton Corporation - Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report
for the year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
|
(x) |
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into with officers of Eaton
Corporation - Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for
the year ended December 31, 2002 |
|
|
(y) |
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into with directors of
Eaton Corporation - Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Report
filed January 26, 2007 |
|
|
(z) |
|
Executive Strategic Incentive Plan (amended and restated January 1,
2008) - Incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement
dated March 14, 2008 |
|
|
(aa) |
|
Executive Strategic Incentive Plan II (effective January 1, 2001) -
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2002 |
|
|
(bb) |
|
Supplemental Executive Strategic Incentive Plan (effective as of June
25, 2008) - Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the
year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
|
(cc) |
|
Deferred Incentive Compensation Plan (amended and restated effective
November 1, 2007) - Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K
Report* |
|
|
(dd) |
|
1998 Stock Plan - Incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy
Statement dated March 13, 1998 |
|
|
(ee) |
|
Incentive Compensation Deferral Plan (amended and restated October 1,
1997) - Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the
year ended December 31, 2000 |
Page 76
|
(ff) |
|
Trust Agreement - Officers and Employees (dated December 6, 1996) -
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2002 |
|
|
(gg) |
|
Trust Agreement - Non-employee Directors (dated December 6, 1996)
- Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2002 |
|
|
(hh) |
|
Group Replacement Insurance Plan (GRIP) (effective June 1, 1992) -
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 1992 |
|
|
(ii) |
|
1991 Stock Option Plan - Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K
Report for the year ended December 31, 2002 |
|
|
(jj) |
|
Excess Benefits Plan (amended and restated effective January 1, 1989)
- Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year
ended December 31, 2002 |
|
|
(kk) |
|
Supplemental Benefits Plan (amended and restated January 1, 1989) -
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2002 |
|
|
(ll) |
|
Eaton Corporation Board of Directors Policy on Incentive
Compensation, Stock Options and Other Equity Grants upon the
Restatement of Financial Results - Incorporated by reference to the
Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
12 |
|
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges - Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
|
|
14 |
|
Code of Ethics - Incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement
filed on March 14, 2008 |
|
|
21 |
|
Subsidiaries of Eaton Corporation - Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
|
23 |
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - Filed in
conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
|
|
24 |
|
Power of Attorney - Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Form 10-K (Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
Section 302) - Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Form 10-K (Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
Section 302) - Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Form 10-K (Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
Section 906) - Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Form 10-K (Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
Section 906) - Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
|
101.INS |
|
XBRL Instance Document * |
|
|
101.SCH |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document * |
|
|
101.CAL |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document * |
|
|
101.DEF |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document * |
|
|
101.LAB |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document * |
|
|
101.PRE |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document * |
|
|
|
* |
|
Submitted electronically herewith. |
|
|
Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following formatted in XBRL (Extensible
Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2009 and
2008, (iii) Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007 (iv) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December
31, 2009. |
|
|
|
In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101
to this Annual Report on Form 10-K shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and
shall not be part of any registration statement or other document filed under the
Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific
reference in such filing. |
Page 77