UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
☒ |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
for the fiscal year ended
OR
☐ |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
for the transition period from to .
Commission File Number: 000-50478
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware |
|
23-3083125 |
(State of Organization or Incorporation) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
545 E. John Carpenter Freeway, Suite 700, Irving, Texas |
|
75062 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
(972) 373-8800
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class |
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share |
|
NASDAQ Global Select Market |
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that it was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by checkmark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (check one):
Large accelerated filer |
|
☒ |
|
Accelerated filer |
|
☐ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer |
|
☐ |
|
Smaller reporting company |
|
☐ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emerging growth company |
|
☐ |
|
|
|
|
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
As of June 30, 2018, the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was $
As of February 26, 2019, the Registrant had
Documents Incorporated By Reference
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Registrant’s 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be filed with the Commission within 120 days after the close of the Registrant’s fiscal year and incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
Page |
PART I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 1A. |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 1B. |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 6. |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 7A. |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 8. |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 9. |
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 9A. |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 9B. |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART III |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 10. |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 11. |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 12. |
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management, and Related Stockholder Matters |
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 13. |
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence |
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 14. |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART IV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 15. |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 16. |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-1 |
General
As used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and unless the context indicates otherwise, “Nexstar” refers to Nexstar Media Group, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries; “Nexstar Broadcasting” refers to Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc., our wholly-owned direct subsidiary; “Nexstar Digital” refers to Nexstar Digital LLC, our-wholly-owned direct subsidiary; the “Company” refers to Nexstar and the variable interest entities (“VIEs”) required to be consolidated in our financial statements; and all references to “we,” “our,” “ours,” and “us” refer to Nexstar.
Nexstar Broadcasting has time brokerage agreements (“TBAs”), shared services agreements (“SSAs”), joint sales agreements (“JSAs”), local marketing agreements (“LMAs”) and outsourcing agreements (which we generally and collectively refer to as “local service agreements”) relating to the television stations owned by VIEs but does not own any of the equity interests in these entities. For a description of the relationship between Nexstar and these VIEs, see Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
The information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K includes information related to Nexstar and its consolidated subsidiaries. It also includes information related to VIEs with whom Nexstar has relationships. In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) and as discussed in Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, the financial results of the consolidated VIEs are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements contained herein.
In the context of describing ownership of television stations in a particular market, the term “duopoly” refers to owning or deriving the majority of the economic benefit, through ownership or local service agreements, from two or more stations in a particular market. For more information on how we derive economic benefit from a duopoly, see Item 1, “Business.”
There are 210 generally recognized television markets, known as Designated Market Areas (“DMAs”), in the United States. DMAs are ranked in size according to various factors based upon actual or potential audience. DMA rankings contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are from Investing in Television Market Report 2018 4th Edition, as published by BIA Financial Network, Inc.
Reference is made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the following trademarks/tradenames which are owned by the third parties referenced in parentheses: Two and a Half Men (Warner Bros. Domestic Television) and Entertainment Tonight (CBS Television Distribution).
3
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). All statements other than statements of historical fact are “forward-looking statements” for purposes of federal and state securities laws, including: any projections or expectations of earnings, revenue, financial performance, liquidity and capital resources or other financial items; any assumptions or projections about the television broadcasting industry; any statements of our plans, strategies and objectives for our future operations, performance, liquidity and capital resources or other financial items; any statements concerning proposed new products, services or developments; any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; any statements of belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Forward-looking statements may include the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “future,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates” and other similar words.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in any of our forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results could differ from a projection or assumption in any of our forward-looking statements. Our future financial position and results of operations, as well as any forward-looking statements, are subject to change and inherent risks and uncertainties discussed under Item 1A, “Risk Factors” located elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are made only as of the date hereof, and we do not have or undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.
4
PART I
Item 1. |
Business |
Overview
We are a television broadcasting and digital media company focused on the acquisition, development and operation of television stations and interactive community websites and digital media services in 100 designated market areas throughout the United States.
As of December 31, 2018, we owned, operated, programmed or provided sales and other services to 174 full power television stations, including those owned by VIEs, in 100 markets in the states of Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia and Wisconsin. The stations are affiliates of ABC, NBC, FOX, CBS, The CW, MNTV and other broadcast television networks. As of December 31, 2018, we reached approximately 42.7 million, or 38.8%, of all U.S. television households.
The stations we own and operate or provide services to provide free over-the-air programming to our markets’ television viewing audiences. This programming includes (a) programs produced by networks with which the stations are affiliated; (b) programs that the stations produce; and (c) first-run and rerun syndicated programs that the stations acquire. Our television stations’ primary sources of revenue include the sale of commercial air time on our stations to local and national advertisers, the sale of advertising on our websites in each of our broadcast markets where we deliver community focused content, and revenues earned from our retransmission consent agreements with traditional multichannel video programming distributors (“MVPDs”), such as cable and satellite providers, and over-the-top video distributors (“OTTDs”), companies that provide video content through internet streaming.
Our digital media businesses provide digital publishing and content management platform, digital video advertising platform, social media advertising platform and other digital media solutions to media publishers and advertisers. We are focused on new technologies and growing our portfolio of digital products and services complementary to our vision of providing local news, entertainment and sports content through broadcast and digital platforms.
We seek to grow our revenue and operating income by increasing the audience and revenue shares of the stations we own, operate, program or provide sales and other services to, as well as through our growing portfolio of digital products and services. We strive to increase the audience share of the stations by creating a strong local broadcasting presence based on highly rated local news, local sports coverage and active community sponsorship. We seek to improve revenue share by employing and supporting a high-quality local sales force that leverages the stations’ strong local brands and community presence with local advertisers. We further improve broadcast cash flow by maintaining strict control over operating and programming costs. The benefits achieved through these initiatives are magnified in our duopoly markets by owning or providing services to stations affiliated with multiple networks, capitalizing on multiple sales forces and achieving an increased level of operational efficiency. As a result of our operational enhancements, we expect revenue from the stations we have acquired or begun providing services to in the last four years to grow faster than that of our more mature stations.
We are a Delaware corporation formed in 1996. Our principal offices are at 545 E. John Carpenter Freeway, Suite 700, Irving, TX 75062. Our telephone number is (972) 373-8800 and our website is http://www.nexstar.tv. The information contained on, or accessible through, our website is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is not incorporated herein by reference.
5
Recent Acquisitions
On January 16, 2018, we acquired the outstanding equity of Likqid Media Inc. (“LKQD”), a video advertising infrastructure company. The purchase price was $97.0 million in cash, including working capital adjustments, of which $94.0 million was paid in January 2018 and the remaining $3.0 million was paid upon final settlement in April 2018. The purchase price was funded by a combination of borrowing under our revolving credit facility and cash on hand.
On July 15, 2018, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire the assets of the CW affiliated television station WHDF from Huntsville TV, LLC (“Huntsville TV”), for $3.0 million in cash, including working capital adjustments. On July 15, 2018, we completed the first closing of the acquisition and acquired the station’s assets excluding certain transmission equipment, Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) licenses and network affiliation agreement for $2.3 million, funded by cash on hand. We completed the second closing on November 9, 2018, acquiring the remaining assets and paying the remaining purchase price of $0.7 million. We provided programming and sales and other services to WHDF pursuant to a TBA from July 15, 2018 until the completion of our acquisition on November 9, 2018.
On August 1, 2018, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire the assets of the FOX affiliated television station KRBK from KRBK LLC for $17.6 million in cash, including working capital adjustments. On August 1, 2018, we completed the first closing of the acquisition and acquired the station’s assets excluding certain transmission equipment, FCC licenses and network affiliation agreement for $15.1 million, funded by cash on hand. We completed the second closing on November 1, 2018, acquiring the remaining assets and paying the remaining purchase price of $2.5 million. We provided programming and sales services to KRBK pursuant to a TBA from August 1, 2018 until the completion of our acquisition on November 1, 2018.
On November 1, 2018, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire the FCC license, certain transmission equipment and network affiliation agreement of KHII, formerly KFVE, (“KHII”) from HITV License Subsidiary, Inc. (“HITV”), the MNTV affiliate serving Honolulu, Hawaii and its satellite stations KGMV serving Wailuku, Hawaii and KGMD serving Hilo, Hawaii. The purchase price is $6.5 million, of which $0.1 million was paid on November 1, 2018. The acquisition received FCC approval on December 17, 2018. We completed the acquisition on January 28, 2019 and paid the remaining purchase price of $6.4 million. Effective November 1, 2018, we began providing programming and sales services to KHII under a TBA until the completion of our acquisition on January 28, 2019.
Merger Agreement with Tribune
On November 30, 2018, we entered into a definitive merger agreement with Tribune Media Company (“Tribune”) to acquire Tribune’s outstanding equity for $46.50 per share in a cash transaction. All equity-based awards of Tribune that are outstanding prior to the merger will vest in full and will be converted into the right to receive the same cash consideration. The estimated total purchase price is valued at $6.4 billion, consisting of the merger cash consideration and the refinancing of Tribune's outstanding debt. Tribune shareholders will be entitled to additional cash consideration of approximately $0.30 per share per month if the transaction has not closed by August 31, 2019, pro-rated for partial months and less an adjustment for any dividends declared on or after September 1, 2019. Tribune currently owns, operates or provides services to 42 television stations.
The merger agreement contains certain termination rights for both us and Tribune. If the merger agreement is terminated in connection with Tribune entering into a definitive agreement with respect to a superior proposal, as well as under certain other circumstances, the termination fee payable by Tribune to us will be $135 million. If the merger agreement is terminated because the required Tribune stockholder vote is not obtained at a stockholder meeting duly held for such purpose, Tribune will be required to reimburse us for our costs and expenses incurred in connection with the transaction in an amount not to exceed $15 million. Either party may terminate the merger agreement if the merger is not consummated on or before an end date of November 30, 2019, with an automatic extension to February 29, 2020, if necessary to obtain regulatory approval under circumstances specified in the merger agreement.
The merger has been approved by the boards of directors of both companies and is projected to close late in the third quarter of 2019, subject to (i) the approval of the merger by the stockholders of Tribune, (ii) FCC approval, (iii) other regulatory approvals (including expiration of the applicable Hart-Scott-Rodino “HSR” waiting period) and (iv) satisfaction of other customary closing conditions. The merger does not require approval of our stockholders and is not subject to any financing contingency. On November 30, 2018, we received committed financing up to a maximum of $6.4 billion from a group of commercial banks to provide the debt financing to consummate the merger and the refinancing of certain of the existing indebtedness of Tribune and related transactions.
6
In connection with obtaining the HSR approval and the FCC approval, Nexstar agreed to divest one or more television stations in certain DMAs. Those DMAs are: (i) Salt Lake City, UT; (ii) Grand Rapids-Kalamazoo-Battle Creek, MI; (iii) Wilkes Barre-Scranton, PA; (iv) Richmond-Petersburg, VA; (v) Des Moines-Ames, IA; (vi) Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News, VA; (vii) Fort Smith-Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR; (viii) Davenport, IA-Rock Island-Moline, IL; (ix) Memphis, TN; (x) Huntsville-Decatur (Florence), AL; (xi) Indianapolis, IN; (xii) Hartford-New Haven, CT and (xiii) Harrisburg, PA. Nexstar is required to designate one or more Tribune stations or Nexstar stations for divestiture in each DMA. Nexstar has also agreed to designate, at its option, certain additional Tribune stations or Nexstar stations for divestiture and to divest such stations in order to comply with the FCC national cap as required by the FCC in order to obtain approval of and consummate the transactions.
Operating Strategy
We seek to generate revenue and broadcast cash flow growth through the following strategies:
Develop Leading Local Franchises. Each of the stations that we own, operate, program, or provide sales and other services to creates a highly recognizable local brand, primarily through the quality of local news programming and community presence. Based on internally generated analysis, we believe that in over 72.5% of our markets in which we produce local newscasts, we rank among the top two stations in local news viewership. Strong local news typically generates higher ratings among attractive demographic profiles and enhances audience loyalty, which may result in higher ratings for programs both preceding and following the news. High ratings and strong community identity make the stations that we own, operate, program, or provide sales and other services to more attractive to local advertisers. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we earned approximately 37.9% of our advertising revenue from spots aired during local news programming. Currently, our stations and the stations we provide services to that produce local newscasts provide between 15 and 30 hours per week of local news programming. Extensive local sports coverage, active sponsorship of community events and the local news stories our Washington, D.C. bureau focuses on further differentiate us from our competitors and strengthen our community relationships and our local advertising appeal.
Invest in Digital Media. We are focused on new technologies and growing our portfolio of digital products and services. Our station websites provide access to our local news and information, as well as community centric businesses and services. We delivered to audiences across all of our station web sites in 2018, with 199 million unique visitors who utilized over 5.0 billion page views. Also in 2018, our mobile websites and mobile application accounted for 36% and 46%, respectively, of our station websites’ overall page views by year end. We have also invested in additional digital media product lines, including a digital video advertising platform acquired in early 2018 and other digital media solutions. We are committed to serving our local markets by providing local content to both online and mobile users wherever and whenever they want.
Emphasize Local Sales. We employ a high-quality local sales force in each of our markets to increase revenue from local advertisers by capitalizing on our investment in local programming and community websites. We believe that local advertising is attractive because our sales force is more effective with local advertisers, giving us a greater ability to influence this revenue source. Additionally, local advertising has historically been a more stable source of revenue than national advertising for television broadcasters. For the year ended December 31, 2018, revenue generated from local advertising represented 73.2% of our consolidated spot revenue (total of local and national advertising revenue, excluding political advertising revenue). In most of our markets, we have increased the size and quality of our local sales force. We also invest in our sales efforts by implementing comprehensive training programs and employing a sophisticated inventory tracking system to help maximize advertising rates and the amount of inventory sold in each time period.
Operate Duopoly Markets. Owning or providing services to more than one station in a given market enables us to broaden our audience share, enhance our revenue share and achieve significant operating efficiencies. Duopoly markets broaden audience share by providing programming from multiple networks with different targeted demographics. These markets increase revenue share by capitalizing on multiple sales forces. Additionally, we achieve significant operating efficiencies by consolidating physical facilities, eliminating redundant management and leveraging capital expenditures between stations. We derived approximately 61.4% of our net revenue, excluding trade revenue, for the year ended December 31, 2018 from our duopoly markets.
Maintain Strict Cost Controls. We emphasize strict controls on operating and programming costs in order to increase broadcast cash flow. We continually seek to identify and implement cost savings at each of our stations and the stations we provide services to and our overall size benefits each station with respect to negotiating favorable terms with programming suppliers and other vendors. By leveraging our size and corporate management expertise, we are able to achieve economies of scale by providing programming, financial, sales and marketing support to our stations and the stations we provide services to.
7
Capitalize on Diverse Network Affiliations. We currently own, operate, program or provide sales and other services to a balanced portfolio of television stations with diverse network affiliations, including ABC, NBC, CBS and FOX affiliated stations which represented approximately 18.3%, 28.8%, 33.0% and 10.2%, respectively, of our 2018 combined local, national and political net revenue. The networks provide these stations with quality programming and numerous sporting events such as NBA basketball, Major League baseball, NFL football, NCAA sports, PGA golf and the Olympic Games. Because network programming and ratings change frequently, the diversity of our station portfolio’s network affiliations reduces our reliance on the quality of programming from a single network.
Attract and Retain High Quality Management. We seek to attract and retain station general managers with proven track records in larger television markets by providing equity incentives not typically offered by other station operators in our markets. Most of our station general managers have been granted restricted stock units and stock options and have an average of over 20 years of experience in the television broadcasting industry.
Acquisition Strategy
We selectively pursue acquisitions of television stations where we believe we can improve revenue and cash flow through active management. When considering an acquisition, we evaluate the target audience share, revenue share, overall cost structure and proximity to our regional clusters. Additionally, we seek to acquire or enter into local service agreements with stations to create duopoly markets. We selectively pursue acquisitions of digital properties that leverage our capabilities particularly in video delivery technology and platforms and with a focus on assisting small and medium-sized businesses to effectively reach targeted consumers and achieve effective marketing campaigns.
Relationship with VIEs
Through various local service agreements, as of December 31, 2018, we provided sales, programming and other services to 38 full power television stations owned by consolidated VIEs and one full power television station owned by an unconsolidated VIE. As of December 31, 2018, all of the VIEs and their stations are 100% owned by independent third parties. In compliance with FCC regulations for all the parties, the VIEs maintain complete responsibility for and control over programming, finances, personnel and operations of their stations. However, for the consolidated VIEs, we are deemed under U.S. GAAP to have controlling financial interests in these entities because of (1) the local service agreements Nexstar has with the consolidated VIEs’ stations, (2) Nexstar’s guarantees of the obligations incurred under Mission Broadcasting, Inc.’s (“Mission”), Marshall Broadcasting Group, Inc.’s (“Marshall”) and Shield Media LLC’s (“Shield”) senior secured credit facilities, (3) Nexstar having power over significant activities affecting the consolidated VIEs’ economic performance, including budgeting for advertising revenue, certain advertising sales and, in some cases, hiring and firing of sales force personnel and (4) purchase options granted by each consolidated VIE, exclusive of Marshall, which permit Nexstar to acquire the assets and assume the liabilities of each of the consolidated VIEs’ stations at any time, subject to FCC consent. These purchase options are freely exercisable or assignable by Nexstar without consent or approval by the VIEs. These option agreements expire on various dates between 2021 and 2028. We expect to renew these option agreements upon expiration. Therefore, these VIEs are consolidated into these financial statements.
8
The Stations
The following chart sets forth general information about the television stations (full power, low power and multicast channels) we currently own, operate, program or provide sales and other services to:
Market Rank(1) |
Market |
Full Power Stations |
Primary Affiliation |
Low Power Stations / Multicast Channels |
Other Affiliation |
Status(2) |
FCC License Expiration Date(4) |
6 |
DC(3)/Hagerstown, MD |
WDVM |
IND |
WDVM-D2, D3, D4 |
Grit, Escape, Laff |
O&O |
10/1/2020 |
8 |
San Francisco, CA |
KRON(25) |
MNTV |
KRON-D2, D3, D4 |
Sky link TV, getTV, Grit TV |
O&O |
12/1/2022 |
11 |
Tampa, FL |
WFLA WTTA(24) |
NBC MNTV |
WFLA-D2, D3 WTTA-D2 |
MeTV, Escape CoziTV |
O&O O&O |
2/1/2021 2/1/2021 |
12 |
Phoenix, AZ |
KASW |
The CW |
KASW-D2, D3, D4 |
HSN, Grit, Escape |
O&O |
10/1/2022 |
22 |
Portland, OR |
KOIN |
CBS |
KOIN-D2, D3 |
getTV, Decades |
O&O |
2/1/2023 |
25 |
Raleigh, NC |
WNCN(25) |
CBS |
WNCN-D3, D4 |
Grit, Escape |
O&O |
12/1/2020 |
27 |
Nashville, TN |
WKRN |
ABC |
WKRN-D2, D3, D4 |
MeTV, Justice, Grit |
O&O |
8/1/2021 |
28 |
Indianapolis, IN |
WISH WNDY(24) |
The CW MNTV |
WISH-D2, D3 WNDY-D2 |
getTV, Justice Bounce |
O&O O&O |
8/1/2021 8/1/2021 |
30 |
Salt Lake City, UT |
KTVX KUCW |
ABC The CW |
KTVX-D2, D3, D4 KUCW-D2, D3, D4 KUWB-LD |
Me-TV, Laff, Heros & Icons Movies!, Grit, Escape CMT |
O&O O&O O&O |
10/1/2022 10/1/2022 10/1/2022 |
33 |
New Haven, CT |
WTNH WCTX(24) |
ABC MNTV |
WTNH-D2 WCTX-D2 |
Bounce Grit |
O&O O&O |
4/1/2023 4/1/2023 |
34 |
Columbus, OH |
WCMH |
NBC |
WCMH-D2, D3, D4 |
MeTV, ION, Laff |
O&O |
10/1/2021 |
38 |
Spartanburg, SC |
WSPA WYCW(24) |
CBS The CW |
WSPA-D2 WYCW-D2 |
ION get TV |
O&O O&O |
12/1/2020 12/1/2020 |
39 |
Las Vegas, NV |
KLAS |
CBS |
KLAS-D2, D3 |
MeTV, Movies |
O&O |
10/1/2022 |
40 |
Austin, TX |
KXAN KNVA KBVO |
NBC The CW MNTV |
KXAN-D2, D3 KNVA-D2, D3, D4 KBVO-CD, D2, D3 KHPB-CD |
Cozi TV, ION Grit, Laff, Escape MNTV, Bounce, Heros&Icons The CW |
O&O LSA(6) O&O O&O |
8/1/2022 8/1/2022 8/1/2022 8/1/2022 |
41 |
Harrisburg, PA |
WHTM |
ABC |
WHTM-D2, D3, D4, D5 |
ION, getTV, Laff, WGCB-TV |
O&O |
8/1/2023 |
43 |
Birmingham, AL |
WIAT |
CBS |
WIAT-D2, D3, D4 |
Escape, Justice, Laff |
O&O |
4/1/2021 |
44 |
Portsmouth, VA |
WAVY WVBT |
NBC FOX |
WAVY-D2, D3, D4 WVBT-D2, D3 |
Bounce, getTV, CBN Cozi TV, Heroes & Icons |
O&O O&O |
10/1/2020 10/1/2020 |
47 |
Albuquerque, NM |
KRQE KREZ(20) KBIM(20) KASY KRWB KWBQ |
CBS CBS CBS MNTV The CW The CW |
KRQE-D2, D3 KREZ-D2 KBIM-D2 KASY-D2, D3, D4 KRWB-D2 KWBQ-D2, D3, D4 |
FOX, Bounce getTV FOX Escape, getTV, Cozi TV MyNet Grit, Laff, ION |
O&O O&O O&O LSA(10) LSA(10) LSA(10) |
10/1/2022 4/1/2022 10/1/2022 10/1/2022 4/1/2021 10/1/2022 |
49 |
Grand Rapids, MI |
WOOD WOTV |
NBC ABC |
WOOD-D2, D3 WOTV-D2, D3, D4 WXSP-CD, D2, D3 |
Bounce, Laff getTV, Grit, Weather MNTV, Cozi TV, Escape |
O&O O&O O&O |
10/1/2021 10/1/2021 10/1/2021 |
51 |
Memphis, TN |
WATN WLMT |
ABC The CW |
WATN-D2, D3 WLMT-D2 |
Laff, Cozi TV MeTV |
O&O O&O |
8/1/2021 8/1/2021 |
52 |
Buffalo, NY |
WNLO WIVB(24) |
The CW CBS |
WNLO-D2, D3, D4 WIVB-D4 |
Bounce Laff |
O&O O&O |
6/1/2023 6/1/2023 |
53 |
Providence, RI |
WPRI WNAC |
CBS FOX |
WPRI-D2, D3, D4 WNAC-D2, D3 |
MNTV, Bounce, getTV The CW, Laff |
O&O LSA(12) |
4/1/2023 4/1/2023 |
54 |
Fresno, CA |
KSEE KGPE |
NBC CBS |
KSEE-D2, D3 KGPE-D2 |
Bounce, Grit Escape |
O&O O&O |
12/1/2022 12/1/2022 |
9
Market Rank(1) |
Market |
Full Power Stations |
Primary Affiliation |
Low Power Stations / Multicast Channels |
Other Affiliation |
Status(2) |
FCC License Expiration Date(4) |
56 |
Richmond, VA |
WRIC |
ABC |
WRIC-D2, D3, D4 |
ION, getTV, Laff |
O&O |
10/1/2020 |
57 |
Little Rock, AR |
KARK KARZ KLRT KASN |
NBC MNTV FOX The CW |
KARK-D2, D3 KARZ-D2, D3 KLRT-D2 |
Laff, Grit Bounce, ION Escape |
O&O O&O LSA(5) LSA(5) |
(4) 6/1/2021 6/1/2021 6/1/2021 |
58 |
Mobile, AL |
WKRG WFNA |
CBS The CW |
WKRG-D2, D3, D4 WFNA-D2, D3, D4 |
ION, MeTV, Laff Bounce, Justice, Grit |
O&O O&O |
4/1/2021 4/1/2021 |
59 |
Albany, NY |
WTEN WXXA |
ABC FOX |
WTEN-D2, D3, D4 WXXA-D2, D3, D4 |
getTV, Justice, Escape OTB-TV, Laff, Bounce |
O&O LSA(9) |
6/1/2023 6/1/2023 |
60 |
Knoxville, TN |
WATE |
ABC |
WATE-D2, D3, D4 |
getTV, Laff, Cozi TV |
O&O |
8/1/2021 |
62 |
Wilkes Barre, PA |
WBRE WYOU |
NBC CBS |
WBRE-D2, D3, D4 WYOU-D2, D3, D4 |
Laff, Grit, Justice Escape, Bounce, Cozi TV |
O&O LSA(5) |
8/1/2023 8/1/2023 |
64 |
Dayton, OH |
WDTN WBDT(24) |
NBC The CW |
WDTN-D2, D3 WBDT-D2 |
Escape, ION Bounce |
O&O LSA(11) |
10/1/2021 10/1/2021 |
66 |
Honolulu, HI |
KHON KHAW(21) KAII(21) KGMD(19) KGMV(19) KHII(19) |
FOX FOX FOX MNTV MNTV MNTV |
KHON-D2, D3, D4
KAII-D2 |
The CW, getTV, Laff
The CW |
O&O O&O O&O O&O O&O O&O |
2/1/2023 2/1/2023 2/1/2023 2/1/2023 2/1/2023 2/1/2023 |
67 |
Green Bay, WI |
WFRV |
CBS |
WFRV-D2 |
Bounce |
O&O |
12/1/2021 |
68 |
Roanoke, VA |
WFXR WWCW |
FOX The CW |
WFXR-D2, D3, D4 WWCW-D2, D3, D4 |
The CW, Bounce, Escape FOX, Laff, Grit |
O&O O&O |
10/1/2020 10/1/2020 |
70 |
Charleston, WV |
WOWK |
CBS |
WOWK-D2, D3, D4 |
Escape, Laff, Grit |
O&O |
10/1/2020 |
72 |
Springfield, MO |
KOLR KOZL KRBK(18) |
CBS MNTV FOX |
KOLR-D2, D3, D4 KOZL-D2, D3 KRBK-D2, D3, D4 |
Laff, Grit, CBN Escape, Bounce MeTV, Movies!, ION |
LSA(5) O&O O&O |
2/1/2022 2/1/2022 2/1/2022 |
75 |
Des Moines, IA |
WOI KCWI |
ABC The CW |
WOI-D2, D3, D4 KCWI-D2, D3, D4 |
Laff, Grit, Cozi TV Escape, Bounce, Quest |
O&O O&O |
2/1/2022 2/1/2022 |
76 |
Wichita, KS |
KSNW KSNC(22) KSNG(22) KSNK(22) |
NBC NBC NBC NBC |
KSNW-D2, D3, D4 KSNC-D2, D3 KSNG-D2
KSNL-LD |
Telemundo, ION, Justice ION, Justice Telemundo
NBC |
O&O O&O O&O O&O O&O |
6/1/2022 6/1/2022 6/1/2022 6/1/2022 6/1/2022 |
78 |
Brownsville, TX |
KVEO |
NBC |
KVEO-D2, D3, D4 |
Estrella, Escape, Grit |
O&O |
8/1/2022 |
79 |
Huntsville, AL |
WZDX WHDF(17) |
FOX The CW |
WZDX-D2, D3, D4 |
MNTV, MeTV, Escape |
O&O O&O |
4/1/2021 4/1/2021 |
80 |
Rochester, NY |
WROC |
CBS |
WROC-D2, D3, D4 |
Bounce, Laff, Escape |
O&O |
6/1/2023 |
81 |
Syracuse, NY |
WSYR |
ABC |
WSYR-D2, D3, D4 |
MeTV, Bounce, Laff |
O&O |
6/1/2023 |
82 |
Champaign, IL |
WCIX WCIA |
MNTV CBS |
WCIX-D2, D3, D4 WCIA-D2, D3, D4 |
CBS, Escape, Laff MNTV, Bounce, Grit |
O&O O&O |
12/1/2021 12/1/2021 |
85 |
El Paso, TX |
KTSM |
NBC |
KTSM-D2, D3, D4 |
Estrella, Escape, Laff |
O&O |
8/1/2022 |
89 |
Waco-Bryan, TX |
KWKT KYLE |
FOX MNTV |
KWKT-D2, D3, D4 KYLE-D2, D3, D4 |
MNTV, Estrella, Bounce FOX, Estrella, Laff |
O&O O&O |
8/1/2022 8/1/2022 |
90 |
Shreveport, LA |
KTAL KMSS KSHV |
NBC FOX MNTV |
KTAL-D2, D3, D4
KSHV-D2, D3, D4 |
Laff, Cozi TV, CBN
Escape, ION, Quest |
O&O LSA(7) LSA(8) |
8/1/2022 6/1/2021 6/1/2021 |
91 |
Colorado Springs, CO |
KXRM |
FOX |
KXRM-D2, D3, D4 KXTU-LD, D2, D4 |
The CW, ION, Escape The CW, Laff, Bounce |
O&O O&O |
4/1/2022 |
92 |
Jackson, MS |
WJTV |
CBS |
WJTV-D2, D3, D4 |
The CW, ION, Laff |
O&O |
6/1/2021 |
93 |
Savannah, GA |
WSAV |
NBC |
WSAV-D2, D3, D4 |
The CW, MeTV, Laff |
O&O |
4/1/2021 |
94 |
Charleston, SC |
WCBD |
NBC |
WCBD-D2, D3, D4 |
The CW, ION, Laff |
O&O |
12/1/2020 |
95 |
Florence, SC |
WBTW |
CBS |
WBTW-D2, D3, D4 |
MNTV, ION, Escape |
O&O |
12/1/2020 |
96 |
Burlington, VT |
WFFF WVNY |
FOX ABC |
WFFF-D2, D3 WVNY-D2, D3, D4 |
Escape, Bounce Laff, Grit, Quest |
O&O LSA(5) |
4/1/2023 4/1/2023 |
97 |
Baton Rouge, LA |
WGMB WVLA |
FOX NBC |
WGMB-D2, D3 WVLA-D2, D3 WBRL-CD KZUP-CD |
The CW, Cozi TV Laff, ION The CW IND |
O&O LSA(8) O&O O&O |
6/1/2021 6/1/2021 6/1/2021 6/1/2021 |
98 |
Quad Cities, IL |
KLJB KGCW WHBF |
FOX The CW CBS |
KLJB-D2 KGCW-D2, D3, D4 WHBF-D2, D3, D4 |
MeTV ThisTV, Laff, Bounce KGCW, Grit, Escape |
LSA(7) O&O O&O |
2/1/2022 2/1/2022 12/1/2021 |
101 |
Fayetteville, AR |
KFTA KNWA |
FOX NBC |
KFTA-D2, D3, D4 KNWA-D2, D3, D4 |
NBC, Escape, Bounce FOX, Laff, Grit |
O&O O&O |
6/1/2021 6/1/2021 |
102 |
Tri-Cities, TN-VA |
WJHL |
CBS |
WJHL-D2 |
ABC |
O&O |
8/1/2021 |
10
Market Rank(1) |
Market |
Full Power Stations |
Primary Affiliation |
Low Power Stations / Multicast Channels |
Other Affiliation |
Status(2) |
FCC License Expiration Date(4) |
103 |
Evansville, IN |
WEHT WTVW |
ABC The CW |
WEHT-D2, D3 WTVW-D2, D3, D4 |
Laff, Cozi TV Bounce, Escape, ION |
O&O LSA(5) |
8/1/2021 8/1/2021 |
104 |
Ft. Wayne, IN |
WANE |
CBS |
WANE-D2, D3, D4 |
ION, Laff, Escape |
O&O |
8/1/2021 |
105 |
Augusta, GA |
WJBF |
ABC |
WJBF-D2, D3, D4 |
MeTV, ION, Escape |
O&O |
4/1/2021 |
106 |
Altoona, PA |
WTAJ |
CBS |
WTAJ-D2, D3, D4 |
Escape, Laff, Grit |
O&O |
8/1/2023 |
107 |
Greenville, NC |
WNCT |
CBS |
WNCT-D2, D3, D4 |
The CW, getTV, Escape |
O&O |
12/1/2020 |
108 |
Springfield, MA |
WWLP |
NBC |
WWLP-D2, D3, D4 |
The CW, ION, Escape |
O&O |
4/1/2023 |
110 |
Lansing, MI |
WLAJ WLNS(24) |
ABC CBS |
WLAJ-D2 |
ABC |
LSA(9) O&O |
10/1/2021 10/1/2021 |
113 |
Peoria, IL |
WMBD WYZZ |
CBS FOX |
WMBD-D2, D3, D4 |
Bounce, Laff, Escape |
O&O LSA(13) |
12/1/2021 12/1/2021 |
114 |
Tyler-Longview, TX |
KETK KFXK |
NBC FOX |
KETK-D2, D3 KFXK-D2, D3, D4 KTPN-LD |
Grit, ION MNTV, Escape, Laff MNTV |
O&O LSA(8) LSA(8) |
8/1/2022 8/1/2022 8/1/2022 |
115 |
Sioux Falls, SD |
KELO KDLO(23) KPLO(23) |
CBS CBS CBS |
KELO-D2, D3, D4 KDLO-D2 KPLO-D2 |
MNTV, ION, Escape MNTV MNTV |
O&O O&O O&O |
4/1/2022 4/1/2022 4/1/2022 |
121 |
Lafayette, LA |
KLFY |
CBS |
KLFY-D2, D3, D4 |
getTV, ION, Laff |
O&O |
6/2/2025 |
122 |
Bakersfield, CA |
KGET |
NBC |
KGET-D2, D3, D4 KKEY-LP |
The CW, Telemundo, Laff Telemundo |
O&O O&O |
12/1/2022 12/1/2022 |
125 |
Youngstown, OH |
WYTV WKBN(24) |
ABC CBS |
WYTV- D2 WKBN-D2 WYFX-LD, D2, D3, D4, D5, D6 |
MNTV FOX FOX, MNTV, ION, Bounce, Laff, getTV |
LSA(11) O&O O&O |
10/1/2021 10/1/2021 |
127 |
Columbus, GA |
WRBL |
CBS |
WRBL-D2, D3, D4 |
MeTV, ION, Laff |
O&O |
4/2/2025 |
130 |
La Crosse, WI |
WLAX WEUX(16) |
FOX FOX |
WLAX-D2, D3, D4 WEUX-D2, D3, D4 |
MeTV, Laff, Grit MeTV, Escape, Bounce |
O&O O&O |
12/1/2021 12/1/2021 |
131 |
Amarillo, TX |
KAMR KCIT |
NBC FOX |
KAMR-D2, D3, D4 KCIT-D2, D3, D4 KCPN-LP |
MNTV, Laff, Cozi TV Grit, Escape, Bounce MNTV |
O&O LSA(5) LSA(5) |
8/1/2022 8/1/2022 8/1/2022 |
137 |
Monroe, AR |
KARD KTVE |
FOX NBC |
KARD-D2, D3, D4 KTVE-D2, D3, D4 |
Bounce, Grit, Cozi TV KARD, Laff, Escape |
O&O LSA(5) |
6/1/2021 6/1/2021 |
139 |
Rockford, IL |
WQRF WTVO |
FOX ABC |
WQRF-D2, D3 WTVO-D2, D3, D4 |
Bounce, Escape MNTV, Laff, Grit |
O&O LSA(5) |
12/1/2021 12/1/2021 |
141 |
Topeka, KS |
KSNT KTKA |
NBC ABC |
KSNT-D2, D3, D4 KTKA-D2, D3, D4 KTMJ-CD, D2, D3, D4 |
FOX, ION, Bounce getTV, The CW, Justice FOX, Escape, Grit, Laff |
O&O LSA(11) O&O |
6/1/2022 6/1/2022 |
142 |
Midland, TX |
KMID KPEJ |
ABC FOX |
KMID-D2, D3, D4 KPEJ-D2 |
Laff, Escape, Grit Estrella |
O&O LSA(7) |
8/1/2022 8/1/2022 |
143 |
Lubbock, TX |
KLBK KAMC |
CBS ABC |
KLBK-D2 KAMC-D2, D3, D4 |
Laff Escape, Bounce, CBN |
O&O LSA(5) |
8/1/2022 8/1/2022 |
146 |
Minot-Bismarck, ND |
KXMA KXMB(15) KXMC KXMD(15) |
The CW CBS CBS CBS |
KXMA-D2, D3, D4 KXMB-D2, D3, D4 KXMC-D2, D3, D4 KXMD-D2, D3, D4 |
CBS, Laff, Escape The CW, Laff, Escape The CW, Laff, Escape The CW, Laff, Escape |
O&O O&O O&O O&O |
4/1/2022 4/1/2022 4/1/2022 4/1/2022 |
148 |
Wichita Falls, TX |
KFDX KJTL |
NBC FOX |
KFDX-D2, D3, D4 KJTL-D2, D3, D4 KJBO-LP |
MNTV, Laff, Cozi TV Grit, Bounce, Escape MNTV |
O&O LSA(5) LSA(5) |
(4) 8/1/2022 8/1/2022 |
149 |
Sioux City, IA |
KCAU |
ABC |
KCAU-D2, D3, D4 |
Escape, Laff, Bounce |
O&O |
2/1/2022 |
150 |
Panama City, FL |
WMBB |
ABC |
WMBB-D2, D3, D4 |
MeTV, Laff, Escape |
O&O |
2/1/2021 |
151 |
Erie, PA |
WJET WFXP |
ABC FOX |
WJET-D2, D3, D4 WFXP-D2, D3 |
Laff, Escape, Cozi TV Grit, Bounce |
O&O LSA(5) |
8/1/2023 8/1/2023 |
153 |
Joplin, MO |
KSNF KODE |
NBC ABC |
KSNF-D2, D3, D4 KODE-D2, D3, D4 |
Laff, Escape, Cozi TV Grit, Bounce, ION |
O&O LSA(5) |
2/1/2022 2/1/2022 |
158 |
Terre Haute, IN |
WTWO WAWV |
NBC ABC |
WTWO-D2, D3, D4 WAWV-D2, D3 |
Laff, Escape, Cozi TV Grit, Bounce |
O&O LSA(5) |
8/1/2021 8/1/2021 |
160 |
Binghamton, NY |
WIVT |
ABC |
WIVT-D2, D3, D4 WBGH-CD, D3 |
NBC, Laff, Escape NBC, ABC |
O&O O&O |
6/1/2023 6/1/2023 |
162 |
Wheeling, WV |
WTRF |
CBS |
WTRF-D2, D3, D4 |
MNTV, ABC, Escape |
O&O |
10/1/2020 |
163 |
Beckley, WV |
WVNS |
CBS |
WVNS-D2 |
FOX |
O&O |
10/1/2020 |
165 |
Abilene, TX |
KTAB KRBC |
CBS NBC |
KTAB-D2, D3, D4 KRBC-D2, D3, D4 |
Telemundo, Escape, ION Grit, Laff, Bounce |
O&O LSA(5) |
8/1/2022 8/1/2022 |
11
Market Rank(1) |
Market |
Full Power Stations |
Primary Affiliation |
Low Power Stations / Multicast Channels |
Other Affiliation |
Status(2) |
FCC License Expiration Date(4) |
167 |
Billings, MT |
KSVI KHMT |
ABC FOX |
KSVI-D2, D3 KHMT-D2, D3, D4 |
Escape, Bounce Grit, Laff, ION |
O&O LSA(5) |
4/1/2022 4/1/2022 |
168 |
Hattiesburg, MS |
WHLT |
CBS |
WHLT-D2, D3, D4 |
The CW, ION, Escape |
O&O |
6/1/2021 |
169 |
Utica, NY |
WFXV WUTR |
FOX ABC |
WFXV-D2, D3 WUTR-D2, D3, D4 WPNY-LP |
Escape, Laff MNTV, Grit, Bounce MNTV |
O&O LSA(5) O&O |
6/1/2023 6/1/2023 6/1/2023 |
170 |
Clarksburg, WV |
WBOY |
NBC |
WBOY-D2, D3, D4 |
ABC, Escape, Laff |
O&O |
10/1/2020 |
171 |
Rapid City, SD |
KCLO |
CBS |
KCLO-D2, D3, D4 |
The CW, ION, Escape |
O&O |
4/1/2022 |
173 |
Dothan, AL |
WDHN |
ABC |
WDHN-D2, D3, D4 |
Escape, Laff, Cozi TV |
O&O |
4/1/2021 |
176 |
Elmira, NY |
WETM |
NBC |
WETM-D2, D3, D4 |
IND, Laff, Escape |
O&O |
6/1/2023 |
177 |
Jackson, TN |
WJKT |
FOX |
WJKT-D2, D3, D4 |
Escape, Laff, Grit |
O&O |
8/1/2021 |
178 |
Watertown, NY |
WWTI |
ABC |
WWTI-D2, D3, D4 |
The CW, Laff, Escape |
O&O |
6/1/2023 |
179 |
Alexandria, LA |
WNTZ |
FOX |
WNTZ-D2, D3, D4 |
Bounce, Escape, Laff |
O&O |
6/1/2021 |
182 |
Marquette, MI |
WJMN |
CBS |
WJMN-D2, D3, D4 |
Escape, Laff, Bounce |
O&O |
10/1/2021 |
187 |
Grand Junction, CO |
KREX KREY(14) KFQX |
CBS CBS FOX |
KREX-D2, D3, D4 KREY-D2, D3, D4 KFQX-D2, D3, D4 KGJT-CD |
Laff, MNTV, Bounce CBS, Escape, Grit CBS, Escape, Grit MNTV |
O&O O&O LSA(5) O&O |
4/1/2022 4/1/2022 4/1/2022 4/1/2022 |
196 |
San Angelo, TX |
KLST KSAN |
CBS NBC |
KLST-D2, D3 KSAN-D2, D3, D4 |
Escape, Grit Laff, Bounce, ION |
O&O LSA(5) |
8/1/2022 8/1/2022 |
(1) |
Market rank refers to ranking the size of the DMA in which the station is located in relation to other DMAs. Source: Investing in Television Market Report 2018 4th Edition, as published by BIA Financial Network, Inc. |
(2) |
O&O refers to stations that we own and operate. LSA, or local service agreement, is the general term we use to refer to a contract under which we provide services utilizing our employees to a station owned and operated by an independent third-party. Local service agreements include TBAs, SSAs, JSAs, LMAs and outsourcing agreements. For further information regarding the LSAs to which we are a party, see Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV, Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
(3) |
Although WDVM is located within the Washington, D.C. DMA, its signal does not reach the entire Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. WDVM serves the Hagerstown, MD sub-market within the DMA. WDVM is the only commercial station licensed in the city of Hagerstown. |
(4) |
Application for renewal of license was submitted timely to the FCC. Under the FCC’s rules, the license expiration date is automatically extended pending FCC review of and action on the renewal application. |
(5) |
These stations are owned by Mission. |
(6) |
KNVA is owned by 54 Broadcasting, a subsidiary of Vaughan Media LLC (“Vaughan”). |
(7) |
These stations are owned by Marshall. |
(8) |
These stations are owned by White Knight Broadcasting (“White Knight”). |
(9) |
These stations are owned by Shield. |
(10) |
These stations are owned by Tamer Media, LLC (“Tamer”). |
(11) |
These stations are owned by Vaughan. |
(12) |
WNAC is owned by WNAC, LLC. |
(13) |
WYZZ is owned by Cunningham Broadcasting Corporation. |
(14) |
KREY operate as satellite stations of KREX. |
(15) |
KXMB and KXMD operate as satellite stations of KXMC. |
(16) |
WEUX operates as a satellite station of WLAX. |
(17) |
On July 15, 2018, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire WHDF’s assets and began providing programming and sales and other services to the station under a TBA. On November 9, 2018, we completed the acquisition of WHDF and terminated the TBA. Refer to Item 1, “Business–Recent Acquisitions” for additional information. |
(18) |
On August 1, 2018, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire KRBK’s assets and began providing programming and sales and other services to the station under a TBA. On November 1, 2018, we completed the acquisition of KRBK and terminated the TBA. Refer to Item 1, “Business–Recent Acquisitions” for additional information. |
(19) |
On November 1, 2018, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire the FCC license, certain transmission equipment and network affiliation agreement of KHII, including its satellite stations KGMV and KGMD. On January 28, 2019, we completed the acquisition. We provided programming and sales and other services to KHII under a TBA from November 1, 2018 until the completion of our acquisition. Refer to Item 1, “Business–Recent Acquisitions” for additional information. |
(20) |
KREZ and KBIM operate as satellite stations of KRQE. |
(21) |
KHAW and KAII operate as satellite stations of KHON. |
(22) |
KSNC, KSNG and KSNK operate as satellite stations of KSNW. |
(23) |
KDLO and KPLO operate as satellite stations of KELO. |
(24) |
Pursuant to the FCC’s incentive auction, these stations ceased broadcasting on their former channels and implemented channel sharing arrangements with another Company station in the same market. |
(25) |
Pursuant to the FCC’s incentive auction, stations KRON and WNCN will move to VHF channels and must vacate their current channels by September 2019 and May 2020, respectively. |
12
Industry Background
Commercial television broadcasting began in the United States on a regular basis in the 1940s. A limited number of channels are available for over-the-air broadcasting in any one geographic area and a license to operate a television station must be granted by the FCC. All television stations in the country are grouped by The Nielsen Company, LLC, a national audience measuring service, into 210 generally recognized television markets, known as DMAs, that are ranked in size according to various metrics based upon actual or potential audience. Each DMA is an exclusive geographic area consisting of all counties in which the home-market commercial stations receive the greatest percentage of total viewing hours. Nielsen publishes data on estimated audiences for the television stations in each DMA on a quarterly basis. The estimates are expressed in terms of a “rating,” which is a station’s percentage of the total potential audience in the market, or a “share,” which is the station’s percentage of the audience actually watching television. A station’s rating in the market can be a factor in determining advertising rates.
Most television stations are affiliated with networks and receive a significant part of their programming, including prime-time hours, from networks. Whether or not a station is affiliated with one of the four major networks (NBC, CBS, FOX or ABC) has a significant impact on the composition of the station’s revenue, expenses and operations. Network programming is provided to the affiliate by the network in exchange for the payment to the network of affiliation fees and the network’s retention of a substantial majority of the advertising time during network programs. The network then sells this advertising time and retains the revenue. The affiliate retains the revenue from the remaining advertising time it sells during network programs and from advertising time it sells during non-network programs.
Broadcast television stations compete for advertising revenue primarily with other commercial broadcast television stations, cable and satellite television systems, OTTDs, Google, Facebook and other online media, newspapers and radio stations serving the same market. Non-commercial, religious and Spanish-language broadcasting stations in many markets also compete with commercial stations for viewers. In addition, the Internet and other leisure activities may draw viewers away from commercial television stations.
Advertising Sales
General
Television station revenue is substantially derived from the sale of local and national advertising. All network-affiliated stations are required to carry advertising sold by their networks which reduces the amount of advertising time available for sale by stations. Our stations sell the remaining advertising to be inserted in network programming and the advertising in non-network programming, retaining all of the revenue received from these sales. A national syndicated program distributor will often retain a portion of the available advertising time for programming it supplies in exchange for no fees or reduced fees charged to stations for such programming. These programming arrangements are referred to as barter programming.
Advertisers wishing to reach a national audience usually purchase time directly from the networks or advertise nationwide on a case-by-case basis. National advertisers who wish to reach a particular region or local audience often buy advertising time directly from local stations through national advertising sales representative firms. Local businesses purchase advertising time directly from the station’s local sales staff.
Advertising rates are based upon a number of factors, including:
|
• |
a program’s popularity among the viewers that an advertiser wishes to target; |
|
• |
the number of advertisers competing for the available time; |
|
• |
the size and the demographic composition of the market served by the station; |
|
• |
the availability of alternative advertising media in the market; |
|
• |
the effectiveness of the station’s sales force; |
|
• |
development of projects, features and programs that tie advertiser messages to programming; and |
|
• |
the level of spending commitment made by the advertiser. |
Advertising rates are also determined by a station’s overall ability to attract viewers in its market area, as well as the station’s ability to attract viewers among particular demographic groups that an advertiser may be targeting. Advertising revenue is positively affected by strong local economies. Conversely, declines in advertising budgets of advertisers, particularly in recessionary periods, adversely affect the broadcast industry and, as a result, may contribute to a decrease in the revenue of broadcast television stations.
13
Seasonality
Advertising revenue is positively affected by national and regional political election campaigns, and certain events such as the Olympic Games or the Super Bowl. Stations’ advertising revenue is generally highest in the second and fourth quarters of each year, due in part to increases in consumer advertising in the spring and retail advertising in the period leading up to, and including, the holiday season. In addition, advertising revenue is generally higher during even-numbered years when state, congressional and presidential elections occur and advertising is aired during the Olympic Games.
Local Sales
Local advertising time is sold by each station’s local sales staff who call upon advertising agencies and local businesses, which typically include car dealerships, retail stores and restaurants. Compared to revenue from national advertising accounts, revenue from local advertising is generally more stable and more predictable. We seek to attract new advertisers to our television stations and websites and to increase the amount of advertising time sold to existing local advertisers by relying on experienced local sales forces with strong community ties, producing news and other programming with local advertising appeal and sponsoring or co-promoting local events and activities. We place a strong emphasis on the experience of our local sales staff and maintain an on-going training program for sales personnel.
National Sales
National advertising time is sold through national sales representative firms which call upon advertising agencies, whose clients typically include automobile manufacturers and dealer groups, telecommunications companies, fast food franchisers and national retailers (some of which may advertise locally).
Compensation for Retransmission Consent
We receive compensation from cable, satellite and other MVPDs and OTTDs in return for our consent to the retransmission of the signals of our television stations. The revenues primarily represent payments from the MVPDs and OTTDs and are typically based on the number of subscribers they have. Our successful negotiations with these distributors have created agreements that now produce meaningful sustainable revenue streams.
Network Affiliations
Except for WDVM (independent station), all of the full power television stations that we own and operate, program or provide sales and other services to as of December 31, 2018 are affiliated with a network pursuant to an affiliation agreement. The agreements with ABC, FOX, NBC and CBS are the most significant to our operations. The terms of these agreements expire as discussed below:
Network Affiliations |
|
Expiration Date |
ABC |
|
30 agreements expire in December 2022. |
FOX |
|
Of the 32 agreements, one expires in June 2019, 30 expire in December 2019 and one(1) expires in December 2020. |
NBC |
|
Of the 33 agreements, 18 expire in December 2019 and 15 expire in December 2020. |
CBS |
|
Of the 46 agreements, 18 expire in in August 2019, one expires in December 2019, one expires in February 2020, 10 expire in June 2020, one expires in January 2021, two expire in June 2021 and 13 expire in December 2021. |
|
(1) |
The affiliation agreement is owned by a station to which we provide sales and other services. We do not consolidate this station in our financial statements due to lack of a controlling financial interest. |
Each affiliation agreement provides the affiliated station with the right to broadcast all programs transmitted by the network with which it is affiliated. In exchange, the network receives affiliation fees and has the right to sell a substantial majority of the advertising time during these broadcasts. We expect the network affiliation agreements listed above to be renewed upon expiration.
14
Competition
Competition in the television industry takes place on several levels: competition for audience, competition for programming and competition for advertising.
Audience. We compete for audience share specifically on the basis of program popularity. The popularity of a station’s programming has a direct effect on the advertising rates it can charge its advertisers. A portion of the daily programming on the stations that we own or provide services to is supplied by the network with which each station is affiliated. In those periods, the stations are dependent upon the performance of the network programs in attracting viewers. Stations program non-network time periods with a combination of self-produced news, public affairs and other entertainment programming, including movies and syndicated programs. The major television networks have also begun to provide their programming directly to the consumer via portable digital devices, such as tablets and cell phones, which present an additional source of competition for television broadcaster audience share. Other sources of competition for audience include home entertainment systems (such as DVDs and DVRs), video-on-demand and pay-per-view, the Internet (including network distribution of programming through websites and mobile platforms) and gaming devices.
Although the commercial television broadcast industry historically has been dominated by the ABC, NBC, CBS and FOX television networks, other newer television networks and the growth in popularity of subscription systems, such as local cable and direct broadcast satellite (“DBS”) systems and video streaming services, which air exclusive programming not otherwise available in a market, have become significant competitors for the over-the-air television audience.
Programming. Competition for programming involves negotiating with national program distributors or syndicators that sell first-run and rerun packages of programming. Stations compete against in-market broadcast station operators for exclusive access to off-network reruns (such as Two and a Half Men) and first-run product (such as Entertainment Tonight) in their respective markets. Cable systems generally do not compete with local stations for programming, although various national cable networks from time to time have acquired programs that would have otherwise been offered to local television stations. Warner Media, LLC, Comcast Corporation, Viacom Inc., CBS Corporation, The News Corporation Limited and the Walt Disney Company each owns a television network and multiple cable networks and also owns or controls major production studios, which are the primary sources of programming for the networks. It is uncertain whether in the future such programming, which is generally subject to short-term agreements between the studios and the networks, will be moved from or to the networks. Television broadcasters also compete for non-network programming unique to the markets they serve. As such, stations strive to provide exclusive news stories and unique features such as investigative reporting and coverage of community events and to secure broadcast rights for regional and local sporting events.
Advertising. Stations compete for advertising revenue with other television stations in their respective markets and other advertising media such as newspapers, radio stations, magazines, outdoor advertising, transit advertising, yellow page directories, direct mail, MVPDs, OTTDs and online media (e.g. Google, Facebook, etc.). Competition for advertising dollars in the broadcasting industry occurs primarily within individual markets. Generally, a television broadcast station in a particular market does not compete with stations in other market areas.
The broadcasting industry is continually faced with technological change and innovation which increase the popularity of competing entertainment and communications media. Further advances in technology may increase competition for household audiences and advertisers. An increase in the popularity of OTTDs may result in popular product offerings that do not include television broadcast stations. The increased use of digital technology by MVPDs, along with video compression techniques, will reduce the bandwidth required for television signal transmission. These technological developments are applicable to all video delivery systems, including over-the-air broadcasting, and have the potential to provide vastly expanded programming to highly targeted audiences. Reductions in the cost of creating additional channel capacity could lower entry barriers for new channels and encourage the development of increasingly specialized “niche” programming. This ability to reach very narrowly defined audiences is expected to alter the competitive dynamics for advertising expenditures. We are unable to predict the effect that these or other technological changes will have on the broadcast television industry or on the future results of our operations or the operations of the stations to which we provide services.
15
Federal Regulation
Television broadcasting is subject to the jurisdiction of the FCC under the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the “Communications Act”). The following is a brief discussion of certain (but not all) provisions of the Communications Act and the FCC’s regulations and policies that affect the business operations of television broadcast stations. Over the years, the U.S. Congress and the FCC have added, amended and deleted statutory and regulatory requirements to which station owners are subject. Some of these changes have a minimal business impact whereas others may significantly affect the business or operation of individual stations or the broadcast industry as a whole. For more information about the nature and extent of FCC regulation of television broadcast stations, you should refer to the Communications Act and the FCC’s rules, case precedent, public notices and policies.
License Grant and Renewal. The Communications Act prohibits the operation of broadcast stations except under licenses issued by the FCC. Television broadcast licenses are granted for a maximum term of eight years and are subject to renewal upon application to the FCC. The FCC is required to grant an application for license renewal if during the preceding term the station served the public interest, the licensee did not commit any serious violations of the Communications Act or the FCC’s rules, and the licensee committed no other violations of the Communications Act or the FCC’s rules which, taken together, would constitute a pattern of abuse. A majority of renewal applications are routinely granted under this standard. If a licensee fails to meet this standard the FCC may still grant renewal on terms and conditions that it deems appropriate, including a monetary forfeiture or renewal for a term less than the normal eight-year period.
After a renewal application is filed, interested parties, including members of the public, may file petitions to deny the application, to which the licensee/renewal applicant is entitled to respond. After reviewing the pleadings, if the FCC determines that there is a substantial and material question of fact whether grant of the renewal application would serve the public interest, the FCC is required to hold a hearing on the issues presented. If, after the hearing, the FCC determines that the renewal applicant has met the renewal standard, the FCC will grant the renewal application. If the licensee/renewal applicant fails to meet the renewal standard or show that there are mitigating factors entitling it to renewal subject to appropriate sanctions, the FCC can deny the renewal application. In the vast majority of cases where a petition to deny is filed against a renewal application, the FCC ultimately grants the renewal without a hearing. No competing application for authority to operate a station and replace the incumbent licensee may be filed against a renewal application.
In addition to considering rule violations in connection with a license renewal application, the FCC may sanction a station licensee for failing to observe FCC rules and policies during the license term, including the imposition of a monetary forfeiture.
Under the Communications Act, the term of a broadcast license is automatically extended during the pendency of the FCC’s processing of a timely renewal application.
Station Transfer. The Communications Act prohibits the assignment or the transfer of control of a broadcast license without prior FCC approval.
Ownership Restrictions. The Communications Act limits the extent of non-U.S. ownership of companies that own U.S. broadcast stations. Under this restriction, the holder of a U.S. broadcast license may have no more than 20% non-U.S. ownership (by vote and by equity). The Communications Act further prohibits more than 25% indirect foreign ownership or control of a licensee through a parent company unless the FCC determines the public interest will not be served by enforcement of such restriction. The FCC has interpreted this provision of the Communications Act to require an affirmative public interest finding before indirect foreign ownership of a broadcast licensee may exceed 25%. The FCC will entertain and authorize, on a case-by-case basis and upon a sufficient public interest showing, proposals to exceed the 25% indirect foreign ownership limit in broadcast licensees. In September 2016, the FCC adopted rules to simplify and streamline the process for requesting authority to exceed the 25% indirect foreign ownership limit and reformed the methodology that publicly traded broadcasters may use to assess their compliance with the foreign ownership restrictions.
The FCC also has rules which establish limits on the ownership of broadcast stations. These ownership limits apply to attributable interests in a station licensee held by an individual, corporation, partnership or other entity. In the case of corporations, officers, directors and voting stock interests of 5% or more (20% or more in the case of certain passive investors, such as insurance companies and bank trust departments) are considered attributable interests. For partnerships, all general partners and non-insulated limited partners are attributable. Limited liability companies are treated the same as partnerships. The FCC also considers attributable the holder of more than 33% of a licensee’s total assets (defined as total debt plus total equity), if that person or entity also provides over 15% of the station’s total weekly broadcast programming or has an attributable interest in another media entity in the same market which is subject to the FCC’s ownership rules. If a shareholder of Nexstar holds a voting stock interest of 5% or more (20% or more in the case of certain passive investors, such as insurance companies and bank trust departments), we must report that shareholder, its parent entities, and attributable individuals and entities of both, as attributable interest holders in Nexstar.
16
The FCC is required to review its media ownership rules every four years to eliminate those rules it finds no longer serve the “public interest, convenience and necessity.” In August 2016, the FCC adopted a Second Report and Order (the “2016 Ownership Order”) concluding the agency’s 2010 and 2014 quadrennial reviews. The 2016 Ownership Order (1) retained the then-existing local television ownership rule and radio/television cross-ownership rule with minor technical modifications, (2) extended the ban on common ownership of two top-four television stations in a market to network affiliation swaps, (3) retained the then-existing ban on newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership in local markets while considering waivers and providing an exception for failed or failing entities, (4) retained the dual network rule, (5) made JSA relationships attributable interests and (6) defined a category of sharing agreements designated as SSAs between stations and required public disclosure of those SSAs (while not considering them attributable). Nexstar and other parties filed petitions seeking reconsideration of various aspects of the 2016 Ownership Order. On November 16, 2017, the FCC adopted an order (the “Reconsideration Order”) addressing the petitions for reconsideration. The Reconsideration Order (1) eliminated the rules prohibiting newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership and limiting television/radio cross-ownership, (2) eliminated the requirement that eight or more independently-owned television stations remain in a market for common ownership of two television stations in the market to be permissible, (3) retained the general prohibition on common ownership of two “top four” stations in a local market but provided for case-by-case review, (4) eliminated the television JSA attribution rule, and (5) retained the SSA definition and disclosure requirement for television stations. These rule modifications took effect on February 7, 2018, when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (the “Third Circuit”) denied a mandamus petition which had sought to stay their effectiveness. The Reconsideration Order’s rule modifications (a) could allow Nexstar to acquire a second television station in certain markets where ownership of two television stations was not previously permitted, (b) allow Nexstar to acquire television stations without regard to any interests of its officers, directors or attributable shareholders in same-market radio stations or newspapers, (c) permit Nexstar’s existing JSAs with independently-owned television stations to remain in effect indefinitely, and (d) could enable Nexstar to enter into new JSAs without violating FCC regulations. The Reconsideration Order remains subject to appeals before the Third Circuit.
In December 2018, the FCC initiated its 2018 quadrennial review with the issuance of a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. Among other things, the FCC seeks comment on all aspects of the local television ownership rule’s implementation and whether the current version of the rule remains necessary in the public interest. Comments and reply comments in the 2018 quadrennial review are due in the first and second quarters of 2019.
Local Television Ownership (Duopoly Rule). Under the current local television ownership, or “duopoly,” rule, a single entity is allowed to own or have attributable interests in two television stations in a market if (1) the two stations do not have overlapping service areas, or (2) one of the combining stations is not ranked among the top four stations in the DMA, although the FCC will consider showings that this “top four” prohibition should not apply in a given case. The duopoly rule also allows the FCC to consider waivers to permit the ownership of a second station, where otherwise prohibited, where the second station has failed or is failing or unbuilt. The FCC reconfirmed that the duopoly rule continues to serve the public interest in the 2016 Ownership Order, which generally retained the rule in the form in which it had existed since 1999. In its Reconsideration Order, however, the FCC modified the duopoly rule to (1) eliminate the “eight voices” test (whereby the rule had previously required, in addition to the “top four” prohibition, that at least eight independently owned television stations remain in a market after a proposed combination) and (2) permit case-by-case review of proposed “top four” combinations (while generally retaining the “top four” prohibition). These modifications took effect on February 7, 2018. The modifications could allow Nexstar to acquire a second television station in certain markets where ownership of two television stations was not previously permitted. The November 2017 reconsideration order remains subject to federal court appeals.
The FCC attributes toward the local television ownership limits another in-market station when one station owner programs that station pursuant to a TBA or LMA, if the programmer provides more than 15% of the second station’s weekly broadcast programming. However, LMAs entered into prior to November 5, 1996 are exempt attributable interests until the FCC determines otherwise. This “grandfathering,” when reviewed by the FCC, is subject to possible extension or termination.
In its 2016 Ownership Order, the FCC reinstated a rule that attributed another in-market station toward the local television ownership limits when one station owner sells more than 15% of the second station’s weekly advertising inventory under a JSA (this rule had been previously adopted but was vacated by the Third Circuit). Parties to JSAs entered into prior to March 31, 2014 were permitted to continue to operate under these JSAs until September 30, 2025. However, in the Reconsideration Order, the FCC eliminated the JSA attribution rule in its entirety. This elimination took effect on February 7, 2018. As a result of this rule elimination, Nexstar’s existing JSAs with independently-owned television stations may remain in effect indefinitely, and Nexstar may enter into new JSAs without violating FCC regulations. The November 2017 reconsideration order remains subject to federal court appeals.
In certain markets, the Company owns and operates both full-power and low-power television broadcast stations. The FCC’s duopoly rule and policies regarding ownership of television stations in the same market apply only to full-power television stations and not low-power television stations.
17
In a number of markets, the Company owns two stations in compliance with the duopoly rule. We also are permitted to own two or more stations in various other markets pursuant to waivers under the FCC’s rules permitting common ownership of a “satellite” television station in a market where a licensee also owns the “primary” station. Additionally, we are permitted to own two stations in the Quad Cities, Illinois/Iowa, Greenville-Spartanburg, South Carolina-Asheville, North Carolina and Hartford-New Haven, Connecticut markets pursuant to waivers allowing ownership of a second station where that station is “failing.”
In all of the markets where we have entered into local service agreements, except for five, we provide programming comprising less than 15% of the second station’s programming. In the five markets where we provide more programming to the second station—WFXP in Erie, Pennsylvania, KHMT in Billings, Montana, KFQX in Grand Junction, Colorado, KNVA in Austin, Texas and WNAC-TV in Providence, Rhode Island—the LMAs were entered into prior to November 5, 1996 and are considered grandfathered. Therefore, we may continue to program these stations under the terms of these agreements until the FCC determines otherwise.
With respect to our other local service agreements, a previous FCC rule made a majority of our JSAs attributable, but this rule was eliminated effective February 7, 2018. As a result, our existing JSAs are no longer attributable and may remain in effect indefinitely. Under rules in effect both prior to and after February 7, 2018, our SSAs with independently owned same-market stations are non-attributable. We may therefore retain our existing SSAs in effect indefinitely, but we must disclose them, and the FCC may in the future consider regulations with respect to such agreements.
National Television Ownership. There is no limit on the number of television stations which a party may own. However, the FCC’s rules limit the percentage of U.S. television households which a party may reach through its attributable interests in television stations to 39%. This rule originally provided that when calculating a party’s nationwide aggregate audience coverage, the ownership of an ultra-high frequency (“UHF”) station would be counted as 50% of a market’s percentage of total national audience. In August 2016, the FCC adopted an order eliminating this “UHF discount.” On reconsideration, however, the FCC reinstated the discount, which took effect once again in June 2017. A petition for review of the FCC’s order reinstating the UHF discount remains pending in a federal appeals court, and Nexstar has intervened in the litigation in support of the FCC. In December 2017, the FCC initiated a proceeding to broadly reexamine its national television ownership rule, including the percentage reach cap and the UHF discount. Comments and reply comments in this proceeding were filed in the first and second quarters of 2018.
The stations that Nexstar owns have a combined national audience reach of 38.8% of television households without the UHF discount.
Radio/Television Cross-Ownership Rule (One-to-a-Market Rule). An FCC rule formerly limited the extent to which a party could hold attributable interests in both television stations and radio stations in the same market. In its November 2017 Reconsideration Order, however, the FCC eliminated the radio/television cross-ownership rule in its entirety. This elimination took effect on February 7, 2018. The Reconsideration Order remains subject to federal court appeals.
Local Television/Newspaper Cross-Ownership Rule. An FCC rule formerly prohibited a party from having an attributable interest in a television station and a daily newspaper in the same market. In its November 2017 Reconsideration Order, however, the FCC eliminated the newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rule in its entirety. This elimination took effect on February 7, 2018. The Reconsideration Order remains subject to federal court appeals.
Local Television/Cable Cross-Ownership. There is no FCC rule prohibiting common ownership of a cable television system and a television broadcast station in the same area.
MVPD Carriage of Local Television Signals. Broadcasters may obtain carriage of their stations’ signals on cable, satellite and other MVPDs through either mandatory carriage or through “retransmission consent.” Every three years all stations must formally elect either mandatory carriage (“must-carry” for cable distributors and “carry one-carry all” for satellite television providers) or retransmission consent. The next election must be made by October 1, 2020 and will be effective January 1, 2021. Must-carry elections require that the MVPD carry one station programming stream and related data in the station’s local market. However, MVPDs may decline a must-carry election in certain circumstances. MVPDs do not pay a fee to stations that elect mandatory carriage.
A broadcaster that elects retransmission consent waives its mandatory carriage rights, and the broadcaster and the MVPD must negotiate in good faith for carriage of the station’s signal. Negotiated terms may include channel position, service tier carriage, carriage of multiple program streams, compensation and other consideration. If a broadcaster elects to negotiate retransmission terms, it is possible that the broadcaster and the MVPD will not reach agreement and that the MVPD will not carry the station’s signal.
18
MVPD operators are actively seeking to change the regulations under which retransmission consent is negotiated before both the U.S. Congress and the FCC in order to increase their bargaining leverage with television stations. On March 3, 2011, the FCC initiated a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to reexamine its rules (i) governing the requirements for good faith negotiations between MVPDs and broadcasters, including implementing a prohibition on one station negotiating retransmission consent terms for another station under a local service agreement; (ii) for providing advance notice to consumers in the event of dispute; and (iii) to extend certain cable-only obligations to all MVPDs. The FCC also asked for comment on eliminating the network non-duplication and syndicated exclusivity protection rules, which may permit MVPDs to import out-of-market television stations in certain circumstances.
In March 2014, the FCC amended its rules governing “good faith” retransmission consent negotiations to provide that it is a per se violation of the statutory duty to negotiate in good faith for a television broadcast station that is ranked among the top-four stations in a market (as measured by audience share) to negotiate retransmission consent jointly with another top-four station in the same market if the stations are not commonly owned. On December 5, 2014, the U.S. Congress extended the joint negotiation prohibition to all non-commonly owned television stations in a market. Under this rule and the subsequent legislation, same-market stations may not (1) delegate authority to negotiate or approve a retransmission consent agreement to another non-commonly owned station located in the same DMA or to a third-party that negotiates on behalf of another non-commonly owned station in the same DMA; or (2) if not commonly owned, facilitate or agree to facilitate coordinated negotiation of retransmission consent terms between themselves, including through the sharing of information. Accordingly, the VIEs with which we have sharing agreements must separately negotiate their respective retransmission consent agreements with MVPDs. Concurrently with its adoption of the prohibition on certain joint retransmission consent negotiations, the FCC also adopted a further notice of proposed rulemaking which seeks additional comment on the elimination or modification of the network non-duplication and syndicated exclusivity rules. Comments and reply comments on the further notice were filed in 2014.
In addition, in the STELA Reauthorization Act of 2014, which was adopted and signed into law in December 2014, the U.S. Congress directed the FCC to commence a rulemaking to “review its totality of the circumstances test for good faith [retransmission consent] negotiations.” The FCC commenced this proceeding in September 2015, and comments and reply comments were filed in 2015 and 2016. In July 2016, the then-Chairman of the FCC publicly announced that the agency would not adopt additional rules in this proceeding. However, the proceeding remains open.
The FCC’s rules also govern which local television signals a satellite subscriber may receive. The U.S. Congress and the FCC have also imposed certain requirements relating to satellite distribution of local television signals to “unserved” households that do not receive a useable signal from a local network-affiliated station and to cable and satellite carriage of out-of-market signals.
Certain online video distributors and other OTTDs have begun streaming broadcast programming over the Internet. In June 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court held that an OTTD’s retransmissions of broadcast television signals without the consent of the broadcast station violate copyright holders’ exclusive right to perform their works publicly as provided under the Copyright Act of 1976, as amended (the “Copyright Act”). In December 2014, the FCC issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposing to interpret the term “MVPD” to encompass OTTDs that make available for purchase multiple streams of video programming distributed at a prescheduled time and seeking comment on the effects of applying MVPD rules to such OTTDs. Comments and reply comments were filed in 2015. Although the FCC has not classified OTTDs as MVPDs to date, several OTTDs have signed agreements for retransmission of local stations within their markets, and others are actively seeking to negotiate such agreements.
The Company has elected to exercise retransmission consent rights for all of its stations where it has legal rights to do so. The Company has negotiated retransmission consent agreements with the majority of MVPDs serving its markets to carry the stations’ signals and, where permitted by its network affiliation agreements, will negotiate agreements with OTTDs.
Employees
As of December 31, 2018, the Company had a total of 8,959 employees, comprised of 8,249 full-time and 710 part-time employees. As of December 31, 2018, 632 of our employees were covered by collective bargaining agreements. We believe that our employee relations are satisfactory, and we have not experienced any work stoppages at any of our facilities. However, we cannot assure you that our collective bargaining agreements will be renewed in the future, or that we will not experience a prolonged labor dispute, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
19
Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we are involved in litigation that arises from the ordinary operations of business, such as contractual or employment disputes or other general actions. In the event of an adverse outcome of these proceedings, we believe the resulting liabilities would not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
On March 16, 2018, a group of companies including Nexstar (the “Defendants”) received a Civil Investigative Demand from the Antitrust Division of the DOJ regarding an investigation into the exchange of certain information related to the pacing of sales related to the same period in the prior year among broadcast stations in some DMAs in alleged violation of federal antitrust law. Other Defendants entered into a proposed consent decree with the DOJ on November 6, 2018. Without admitting any wrongdoing, Nexstar agreed to settle the matter with the DOJ on December 5, 2018. The DOJ filed an amended complaint adding Nexstar to the consent decree on December 13, 2018. The consent decree, which settles any claims by the government of alleged violations of federal antitrust laws in connection with the alleged information sharing, does not include any financial penalty. Pursuant to the consent decree, we have agreed not to exchange certain non-public information with other stations operating in the same DMA except in certain cases, to implement certain antitrust compliance measures and to monitor and report on compliance with the consent decree.
On July 30, 2018, Clay, Massey & Associates, PC filed an antitrust class action complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated against Gray Television, Inc., Hearst Communications, Nexstar Media Group, Inc., Tegna Inc., Tribune Media Company and Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. The lawsuit alleges unlawful coordination between broadcast television station owners to artificially increase prices of television spot advertisements in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. §1). Nexstar has since been named in 15 similar complaints, including ten in the Northern District of Illinois, three in the Southern District of New York, and two in the District of Maryland. Each complaint includes similar allegations and claims a violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. One, filed in the District of Maryland, also alleges violations of state antitrust and consumer protection statutes and a claim for unjust enrichment.
On October 9, 2018, these cases were consolidated in a multi-district litigation in the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois captioned In Re: Local TV Advertising Antitrust Litigation, No. 1:18-cv-06785 (“MDL Litigation”). On January 23, 2019, the Court in the MDL Litigation appointed plaintiffs’ lead and liaison counsel. The MDL Litigation is ongoing. Nexstar denies the allegations against it and will defend its advertising practices as necessary.
Available Information
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers, including us, that file electronically with the SEC. The address for the SEC’s website is http://www.sec.gov. Due to the availability of our filings on the SEC website, we do not currently make available our filings on our Internet website. Upon request, we will provide free copies of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and any other filings with the SEC. Requests can be sent to Nexstar Media Group, Inc., Attn: Investor Relations, 545 E. John Carpenter Freeway, Suite 700, Irving, TX 75062. Additional information about us, our stations and the stations we program or provide services to can be found on our website at http://www.nexstar.tv. We do not incorporate the information contained on or accessible through our corporate web site into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
20
Item 1A. |
Risk Factors |
You should carefully consider the risks described below and all of the information contained in this document. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only risks and uncertainties that the Company faces. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to the Company or that the Company currently deems immaterial may also impair the Company’s business operations. If any of those risks occur, the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations could suffer. The risks discussed below also include forward-looking statements, and the Company’s actual results may differ substantially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” for further information.
Risks Related to Our Operations
General trends in the television industry could adversely affect demand for television advertising as consumers migrate to alternative media, including the Internet, for entertainment.
Television viewing among consumers has been negatively impacted by the increasing availability of alternative media, including the Internet. In recent years, demand for television advertising has been declining and demand for advertising in alternative media has been increasing, and we expect this trend to continue.
The networks have begun streaming some of their programming on the Internet and other distribution platforms simultaneously with, or in close proximity to, network programming broadcast on local television stations, including those we own or provide services to. These and other practices by the networks dilute the exclusivity and value of network programming originally broadcast by the local stations and may adversely affect the business, financial condition and results of operations of our stations. Also, refer to “Risks Related to Our Industry – Intense competition in the television industry and alternative forms of media could limit our growth and profitability.”
The Company’s substantial debt could limit its ability to grow and compete.
As of December 31, 2018, the Company had $4.0 billion of debt, which represented 68.2% of the total combined capitalization.
The Company’s high level of debt could have important consequences to its business. For example, it could:
|
• |
limit the Company’s ability to borrow additional funds or obtain additional financing in the future; |
|
• |
limit the Company’s ability to pursue acquisition opportunities; |
|
• |
expose the Company to greater interest rate risk since the interest rate on borrowings under the senior secured credit facilities is variable; |
|
• |
limit the Company’s flexibility to plan for and react to changes in our business and our industry; and |
|
• |
impair our ability to withstand a general downturn in our business and place us at a disadvantage compared to our competitors that are less leveraged. |
See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Contractual Obligations” for disclosure of the approximate aggregate amount of principal indebtedness scheduled to mature.
The Company could also incur additional debt in the future. The terms of the Company’s senior secured credit facilities, as well as the indentures governing our 6.125% senior unsecured notes (“6.125% Notes”), our 5.625% senior unsecured notes (“5.625% Notes”) and our 5.875% senior unsecured notes (“5.875% Notes”), limit, but do not prohibit the Company from incurring substantial amounts of additional debt. To the extent the Company incurs additional debt, we would become even more susceptible to the leverage-related risks described above.
21
The agreements governing the Company’s debt contain various covenants that limit management’s discretion in the operation of our business.
The terms of the Company’s senior secured credit facilities and the indentures governing our 6.125% Notes, 5.625% Notes and 5.875% Notes contain various restrictive covenants customary for arrangements of these types that restrict our ability to, among other things:
|
• |
incur additional debt and issue preferred stock; |
|
• |
pay dividends and make other distributions; |
|
• |
make investments and other restricted payments; |
|
• |
make acquisitions; |
|
• |
merge, consolidate or transfer all or substantially all of our assets; |
|
• |
enter into sale and leaseback transactions; |
|
• |
create liens; |
|
• |
sell assets or stock of our subsidiaries; and |
|
• |
enter into transactions with affiliates. |
In addition, the Company’s senior secured credit facilities require us to maintain or meet certain financial ratios, including a maximum consolidated first lien net leverage ratio. Future financing agreements may contain similar, or even more restrictive, provisions and covenants. Because of these restrictions and covenants, management’s ability to operate our business at its discretion is limited, and we may be unable to compete effectively, pursue acquisitions or take advantage of new business opportunities, any of which could harm our business.
If we fail to comply with the restrictions in present or future financing agreements, a default may occur. A default could allow creditors to accelerate the related debt as well as any other debt to which a cross-acceleration or cross-default provision applies. A default could also allow creditors to foreclose on any collateral securing such debt.
The credit agreement governing our obligations under our senior secured credit facility contains covenants that require us to comply with a maximum consolidated first lien net leverage ratio of 4.25 to 1.00. The covenants, which are calculated on a quarterly basis, include the combined results of the Company. The credit agreements governing Mission’s, Marshall’s and Shield’s obligations under their senior secured credit facilities do not contain financial covenant ratio requirements; however, they include events of default if we do not comply with all covenants contained in the credit agreement governing our senior secured credit facility.
The Company may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow to meet its debt service requirements.
The Company’s ability to service its debt depends on its ability to generate the necessary cash flow. Generation of the necessary cash flow is partially subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond the Company’s control. The Company cannot assure you that its business will generate cash flow from operations, that future borrowings will be available to the Company under its current or any replacement credit facilities, or that it will be able to complete any necessary financings, in amounts sufficient to enable the Company to fund its operations or pay its debts and other obligations, or to fund its liquidity needs. If the Company is not able to generate sufficient cash flow to service its debt obligations, it may need to refinance or restructure its debt, sell assets, reduce or delay capital investments, or seek to raise additional capital. Additional financing may not be available in sufficient amounts, at times or on terms acceptable to the Company, or at all. If the Company is unable to meet its debt service obligations, its lenders may determine to stop making loans to the Company, and/or the Company’s lenders or other holders of its debt could accelerate and declare due all outstanding obligations under the respective agreements, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company.
22
The owners of the VIEs may make decisions regarding the operation of their respective stations that could reduce the amount of cash we receive under our local service agreements.
As of December 31, 2018, the VIEs are each 100% owned by independent third parties. These entities owned and operated 39 full power television stations. We have entered into local service agreements with these VIEs, pursuant to which we provide services to their stations. In return for the services we provide, we receive substantially all of the VIEs’ available cash, after satisfaction of their operating costs and any debt obligations.
On June 28, 2018, Marshall amended its senior secured credit facility. The amendment refinanced the then outstanding principal balances of Marshall’s Term Loan A and revolving credit facility of $48.8 million and $3.0 million, respectively. The refinancing was funded by Marshall’s new Term Loan A of $51.8 million. The amendment also extended the maturity date of Marshall’s Term Loan A to December 1, 2019.
On October 26, 2018, Mission refinanced its Term Loan B and revolving credit facility. The amendment extended the maturity date of Mission’s revolving credit facility from July 19, 2022 to October 26, 2023 and reduced the applicable margin portion of the interest rates by 25 basis points for both the Term Loan B and revolving loan.
On October 26, 2018, Shield refinanced its Term Loan A. The amendment extended the maturity date from July 19, 2022 to October 26, 2023 and reduced the applicable margin portion of the interest rate by 25 basis points.
As of December 31, 2018, Mission’s senior secured credit facility consists of a Term Loan B with an outstanding balance of $224.6 million due January 17, 2024 and a $3.0 million revolving credit facility, of which nothing was drawn and outstanding. Marshall’s senior secured credit facility consists of a Term Loan A with an outstanding balance of $45.4 million due December 1, 2019 and a revolving credit facility with an outstanding balance of $5.6 million, also due on December 1, 2019. Shield’s senior secured credit facility consists of a Term Loan A with an outstanding balance of $22.6 million due October 26, 2023.
We guarantee full payment of all of the obligations incurred under the Mission, Marshall and Shield senior secured credit facilities in the event of their default. All consolidated VIEs, exclusive of Marshall, have granted purchase options that permit Nexstar to acquire the assets and assume the liabilities of each of those VIEs’ stations, subject to FCC consent. These purchase options are freely exercisable or assignable by Nexstar without consent or approval by the VIEs.
We do not own the VIEs or any of their respective television stations. However, we are deemed under U.S. GAAP to have controlling financial interests in the consolidated VIEs because of (1) the local service agreements Nexstar has with the VIEs’ stations, (2) Nexstar’s guarantees of the obligations incurred under the Mission, Marshall and Shield senior secured credit facilities, (3) Nexstar having power over significant activities affecting the VIEs’ economic performance, including budgeting for advertising revenue, advertising sales and, in some cases, hiring and firing of sales force personnel and (4) purchase options granted by each VIE, exclusive of Marshall, which permit Nexstar to acquire the assets and assume the liabilities of each of the VIEs’ stations at any time, subject to FCC consent.
In compliance with FCC regulations, the VIEs maintain complete responsibility for and control over programming, finances and personnel for their respective stations. As a result, the VIEs’ boards of directors and officers can make decisions with which we disagree and which could reduce the cash flow generated by these stations and, as a consequence, the amounts we receive under our local service agreements with the VIEs. For instance, the VIEs may decide to obtain and broadcast programming which, in our opinion, would prove unpopular and/or would generate less advertising revenue.
The Company’s pension and other postretirement benefit plans are currently underfunded. A declining stock market and lower interest rates could affect the value of the Company’s retirement plan assets and increase its postretirement obligations.
The Company has a funded, qualified non-contributory defined benefit retirement plan which covers certain employees and former employees. As of December 31, 2018, these qualified retirement plans were underfunded by approximately $40.8 million. The qualified retirement plans had $330.9 million in total net assets available to pay benefits to participants enrolled in the plans as of December 31, 2018. The Company made no contributions in 2018 to the plan.
The Company also has non-contributory unfunded supplemental executive retirement and ERISA excess plans which supplement the coverage of the defined benefit retirement plan to certain employees and former employees. As of December 31, 2018, the total liability was $51.9 million. The Company also has a retiree medical savings account plan which reimburses eligible retired employees for certain medical expenses and an unfunded plan that provides certain health and life insurance benefits to retired employees who were hired prior to 1992. Although the Company has frozen participation and benefits under all plans, two significant elements in determining the Company’s pension expense are the expected return on plan assets and the discount rate used in projecting obligations. Large declines in the stock market and lower discount rates increase the Company’s expense and may necessitate higher cash contributions to the qualified retirement plans.
23
The recording of deferred tax asset valuation allowances in the future or the impact of tax law changes on such deferred tax assets could affect our operating results.
The Company currently has significant net deferred tax assets resulting from tax credit carryforwards, net operating losses and other deductible temporary differences that are available to reduce taxable income in future periods. Based on our assessment of the Company’s deferred tax assets, we determined that as of December 31, 2018, based on projected future income, approximately $103.1 million of the Company’s deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance, will more likely than not be realized in the future. Should we determine in the future that these assets will not be realized, the Company will be required to record a valuation allowance in connection with these deferred tax assets and the Company’s operating results would be adversely affected in the period such determination is made. In addition, tax law changes could negatively impact the Company’s deferred tax assets.
The Company’s ability to use net operating loss carry-forwards (“NOLs”) to reduce future tax payments may be limited if taxable income does not reach sufficient levels or there is a change in ownership of Nexstar, Mission, Marshall or certain of our other VIEs.
At December 31, 2018, the Company had NOLs of approximately $148.6 million for U.S. federal tax purposes and $301.8 million for state tax purposes. Federal NOLs generated for years prior to 2018 expire at varying dates through 2037 and NOLs generated in 2018 carry forward indefinitely. To the extent available, we intend to use these NOLs to reduce the corporate income tax liability associated with our operations. Section 382 (“Section 382”) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), generally imposes an annual limitation on the amount of NOLs that may be used to offset taxable income when a corporation has undergone significant changes in stock ownership. In general, an ownership change, as defined by Section 382, results from a transaction or series of transactions over a three-year period resulting in an ownership change of more than 50 percentage points of the outstanding stock of a company by certain stockholders or public groups, which are generally outside of our control.
The ability to use NOLs is also dependent upon the Company’s ability to generate taxable income. The NOLs could expire before the Company generates sufficient taxable income to use them. To the extent the Company’s use of NOLs is significantly limited, the Company’s income could be subject to corporate income tax earlier than it would if it were able to use NOLs, which could have a negative effect on the Company’s financial results and operations. Changes in ownership are largely beyond the Company’s control and the Company can give no assurance that it will continue to have realizable NOLs.
The revenue generated by stations we operate or provide services to could decline substantially if they fail to maintain or renew their network affiliation agreements on favorable terms, or at all.
Due to the quality of the programming provided by the networks, stations that are affiliated with a network generally have higher ratings than unaffiliated independent stations in the same market. As a result, it is important for stations to maintain their network affiliations. Most of the stations that we operate or provide services to have network affiliation agreements. As of December 31, 2018, 30 full power television stations have primary affiliation agreements with ABC, 33 with NBC, 32 with FOX, 46 with CBS, 18 with The CW and 14 with MNTV. Each of ABC, NBC and CBS generally provides affiliated stations with up to 22 hours of prime-time programming per week, while each of FOX, MNTV and The CW provides affiliated stations with up to 15 hours of prime-time programming per week. In return, affiliated stations broadcast the respective network’s commercials during the network programming.
All of the network affiliation agreements of the stations that we own, operate, program or provide sales and other services to are scheduled to expire at various times through December 2022. In order to renew certain of our affiliation agreements we may be required to make cash payments to the network and to accept other material modifications of existing affiliation agreements. If any of our stations cease to maintain affiliation agreements with their networks for any reason, we would need to find alternative sources of programming, which may be less attractive to our audiences and more expensive to obtain. In addition, a loss of a specific network affiliation for a station may affect our retransmission consent payments resulting in us receiving less retransmission consent fees. Further, some of our network affiliation agreements are subject to earlier termination by the networks under specified circumstances.
For more information regarding these network affiliation agreements, see Item 1, “Business—Network Affiliations.”
24
The loss of or material reduction in retransmission consent revenues or further change in the current retransmission consent regulations could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
A significant portion of Nexstar’s revenue comes from its retransmission consent agreements with MPVDs (mainly cable and satellite television providers) and OTTDs. These agreements permit the distributors to retransmit our stations’ signals to their subscribers in exchange for the payment of compensation to us from the system operators as consideration. If we are unable to renegotiate these agreements on favorable terms, or at all, the failure to do so could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Though we are typically able to renegotiate our retransmission consent agreements on favorable terms, the payments due us under these agreements are customarily based on a price per subscriber of the applicable distributor. In recent years the subscribership of MVPDs has declined, as the growth of direct Internet streaming of video programming to televisions and mobile devices has incentivized consumers to “cut the cord” and discontinue their cable or satellite service subscriptions. Decreasing MVPD subscribership leads to less revenue under our retransmission agreements, which ultimately could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, refer to “Risks Related to Our Industry – Intense competition in the television industry and alternative forms of media could limit our growth and profitability.”
Moreover, the national television broadcast networks have taken the position that they, as the owners or licensees of certain of the programming we broadcast and provide for retransmission, are entitled to a portion of the compensation we receive from MVPDs under our retransmission consent agreements and are requiring their network affiliation agreements with us to provide for such payments. All of our affiliation agreements with the broadcast networks also include terms that limit our ability to grant retransmission consent rights to traditional MVPDs as well as OTTDs, services that provide multiple video streaming channels to consumers. The need to pay a portion of our retransmission consent revenue to our networks, and network limitations on our ability to enter into retransmission consent agreements, could materially reduce this revenue source to the Company and could have an adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, MVPDs are actively seeking to change the regulations under which retransmission consent is negotiated before both the U.S. Congress and the FCC in order to increase their bargaining leverage with television stations. On March 3, 2011, the FCC initiated a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to reexamine its rules (1) governing the requirements for good faith negotiations between MVPDs and broadcasters, including implementing a prohibition on one station negotiating retransmission consent terms for another station under a local service agreement; (2) for providing advance notice to consumers in the event of dispute; and (3) to extend certain cable-only obligations to all MVPDs. The FCC also asked for comment on eliminating the network non-duplication and syndicated exclusivity protection rules, which may permit MVPDs to import out-of-market television stations in certain circumstances.
On March 31, 2014, the FCC amended its rules governing “good faith” retransmission consent negotiations to provide that it is a per se violation of the statutory duty to negotiate in good faith for a television broadcast station that is ranked among the top-four stations in a market (as measured by audience share) to negotiate retransmission consent jointly with another top-four station in the same market if the stations are not commonly owned. On December 5, 2014, the U.S. Congress extended the joint negotiation prohibition to all non-commonly owned television stations in a market. Under this rule and the subsequent legislation, same-market stations may not (1) delegate authority to negotiate or approve a retransmission consent agreement to another non-commonly owned station located in the same DMA or to a third-party that negotiates on behalf of another non-commonly owned television station in the same DMA; or (2) if not commonly owned, facilitate or agree to facilitate coordinated negotiation of retransmission consent terms between themselves, including through the sharing of information. Accordingly, the VIEs with which we have sharing agreements must separately negotiate their respective retransmission consent agreements with MVPDs and OTTDs.
Concurrently with its adoption of the prohibition on certain joint retransmission consent negotiations, the FCC also adopted a further notice of proposed rulemaking which seeks additional comment on the elimination or modification of the network non-duplication and syndicated exclusivity rules. The FCC’s prohibition on certain joint retransmission consent negotiations and its possible elimination or modification of the network non-duplication and syndicated exclusivity protection rules may affect the Company’s ability to sustain its current level of retransmission consent revenues or grow such revenues in the future and could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company cannot predict the resolution of the FCC’s network non-duplication and syndicated exclusivity proposals, or the impact of these proposals, on its business.
In addition, in the STELA Reauthorization Act of 2014, which was adopted and signed into law in December 2014, the U.S. Congress directed the FCC to commence a rulemaking to “review its totality of the circumstances test for good faith [retransmission consent] negotiations.” The FCC commenced this proceeding in September 2015, and comments and reply comments were submitted in 2015 and 2016. In July 2016, the then-Chairman of the FCC announced that the agency would not adopt additional rules in this proceeding. However, the proceeding remains open.
25
Certain online video distributors and other OTTDs have begun streaming broadcast programming over the Internet. In June 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court held that an OTTD’s retransmissions of broadcast television signals without the consent of the broadcast station violate copyright holders’ exclusive right to perform their works publicly as provided under the Copyright Act. In December 2014, the FCC issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposing to interpret the term “MVPD” to encompass OTTDs that make available for purchase multiple streams of video programming distributed at a prescheduled time and seeking comment on the effects of applying MVPD rules to such OTTDs. Comments and reply comments were filed in 2015. Although the FCC has not classified OTTDs as MVPDs to date, several OTTDs have signed agreements for retransmission of local stations within their markets, and others are actively seeking to negotiate such agreements. If the FCC ultimately determines that an OTTD is not an MVPD or declines to apply certain rules governing MVPDs to OTTDs, our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
The FCC could decide not to grant renewal of the FCC license of any of the stations we operate or provide services to which would require that station to cease operations.
Television broadcast licenses are granted for a maximum term of eight years and are subject to renewal upon application to the FCC. The FCC is required to grant an application for license renewal if, during the preceding term, the station served the public interest, the licensee did not commit any serious violations of the Communications Act or the FCC’s rules, and the licensee committed no other violations of the Communications Act or the FCC’s rules which, taken together, would constitute a pattern of abuse. A majority of renewal applications are routinely granted under this standard. If a licensee fails to meet this standard the FCC may still grant renewal on terms and conditions that it deems appropriate, including a monetary forfeiture or renewal for a term less than the normal eight-year period. However, in an extreme case, the FCC may deny a station’s license renewal application, resulting in termination of the station’s authority to broadcast. Under the Communications Act, the term of a broadcast license is automatically extended during the pendency of the FCC’s processing of a timely renewal application. The Company expects the FCC to grant future renewal applications for its stations in due course but cannot provide any assurances that the FCC will do so.
The loss of the services of our chief executive officer could disrupt management of our business and impair the execution of our business strategies.
We believe that our success depends upon our ability to retain the services of Perry A. Sook, our founder and President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Sook has been instrumental in determining our strategic direction and focus. The loss of Mr. Sook’s services could adversely affect our ability to manage effectively our overall operations and successfully execute current or future business strategies. On January 15, 2019, we extended Mr. Sook’s executive employment agreement with Nexstar until February 28, 2023, with automatic renewal for successive one-year periods.
The Company’s growth may be limited if it is unable to implement its acquisition strategy.
The Company has achieved much of its growth through acquisitions. The Company intends to continue its growth by selectively pursuing acquisitions of television stations. The television broadcast industry is undergoing consolidation, which may reduce the number of acquisition targets and increase the purchase price of future acquisitions. Some of the Company’s competitors may have greater financial or management resources with which to pursue acquisition targets. Therefore, even if the Company is successful in identifying attractive acquisition targets, it may face considerable competition and its acquisition strategy may not be successful.
FCC rules and policies may also make it more difficult for the Company to acquire additional television stations. Television station acquisitions are subject to the approval of the FCC and, potentially, other regulatory authorities. FCC rules limit the number of television stations a company may own and define the types of local service agreements that “count” as ownership by the party providing the services. Those rules are subject to change. The need for FCC and other regulatory approvals could restrict the Company’s ability to consummate future transactions, including the proposed acquisition of Tribune, if, for example, the FCC or other government agencies believe that a proposed transaction would result in excessive concentration or other public interest detriment in a market, even if the proposed combination may otherwise comply with FCC ownership limitations. Additionally, our television acquisitions over the past several years have significantly increased the Company’s national audience reach to a level that approaches national television ownership limits imposed by the Communications Act and FCC rules. This may restrict future television station acquisitions by the Company and may require the Company to divest current stations in connection with any acquisition in order to comply with national television ownership limits.
26
Growing the Company’s business through acquisitions involves risks and if it is unable to manage effectively its growth, its operating results will suffer.
During the three years ended December 31, 2018, the Company acquired or assumed the agreements to provide services to a total of 79 full power television stations, net of divestitures, of which 65 full power stations in 42 markets were acquired or local service agreements assumed through our merger with Media General, Inc. (“Media General”), net of required station divestitures previously owned by us and Media General and a relinquishment of a station pursuant to the completed spectrum auction in 2017. Following these transactions, we now own, operate, program or provide sales and other services to 174 full power television stations in 100 markets. Additionally, we have entered into a definitive merger agreement to acquire Tribune’s outstanding equity for cash consideration. Tribune currently owns, operates or provides services to 42 television stations. To manage effectively its growth and address the increased reporting requirements and administrative demands that will result from future acquisitions, the Company will need, among other things, to continue to develop its financial and management controls and management information systems. The Company will also need to continue to identify, attract and retain highly skilled finance and management personnel. Failure to do any of these tasks in an efficient and timely manner could seriously harm its business.
There are other risks associated with growing our business through acquisitions. For example, with any past or future acquisition, there is the possibility that:
|
• |
we may not be able to successfully reduce costs, increase advertising revenue or audience share or realize anticipated synergies and economies of scale with respect to any acquired station; |
|
• |
we may not be able to generate adequate returns on our acquisitions or investments; |
|
• |
we may encounter and fail to address risks or other problems associated with or arising from our reliance on the representations and warranties and related indemnities, if any, provided to us by the sellers of acquired companies; |
|
• |
an acquisition may increase our leverage and debt service requirements or may result in our assuming unexpected liabilities; |
|
• |
our management may be reassigned from overseeing existing operations by the need to integrate the acquired business; |
|
• |
we may experience difficulties integrating operations and systems, as well as company policies and cultures; |
|
• |
we may be unable to retain and grow relationships with the acquired company’s key customers; |
|
• |
we may fail to retain and assimilate employees of the acquired business; and |
|
• |
problems may arise in entering new markets in which we have little or no experience. |
The occurrence of any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, particularly during the period immediately following any acquisition.
FCC actions may restrict our ability to create duopolies under local service agreements or common ownership, which may harm our existing operations and impair our acquisition strategy.
In a number of our markets, we have created duopolies by entering into what we refer to as local service agreements. While these agreements take varying forms, a typical local service agreement is an agreement between two separately owned television stations serving the same market, whereby the owner of one station provides operational assistance to the other station, subject to ultimate editorial and other controls being exercised by the latter station’s owner. By operating or entering into local service agreements with same-market stations, we (and the other station) achieve significant operational efficiencies. We also broaden our audience reach and enhance our ability to capture more advertising spending in a given market. Additionally, we achieve significant operational efficiencies by owning multiple stations in a market where FCC rules allow us to do so.
The FCC is required to review its media ownership rules every four years and eliminate those rules it finds no longer serve the “public interest, convenience and necessity.” In August 2016, the FCC adopted the 2016 Ownership Order concluding the agency’s 2010 and 2014 quadrennial reviews. The 2016 Ownership Order (1) retained the then-existing local television ownership rule and radio/television cross-ownership rule with minor technical modifications, (2) extended the ban on common ownership of two top-four television stations in a market to network affiliation swaps, (3) retained the then-existing ban on newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership in local markets while considering waivers and providing an exception for failed or failing entities, (4) retained the dual network rule, (5) made JSA relationships attributable interests, and (6) defined a category of sharing agreements designated as SSAs between stations and required public disclosure of those SSAs (while not considering them attributable).
27
Nexstar and other parties filed petitions seeking reconsideration of various aspects of the 2016 Ownership Order. On November 16, 2017, the FCC adopted the Reconsideration Order addressing the petitions for reconsideration. The Reconsideration Order (1) eliminated the rules prohibiting newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership and limiting television/radio cross-ownership, (2) eliminated the requirement that eight or more independently-owned television stations remain in a market for common ownership of two television stations in the market to be permissible, (3) retained the general prohibition on common ownership of two “top four” stations in a local market but provided for case-by-case review, (4) eliminated the television JSA attribution rule, and (5) retained the SSA definition and disclosure requirement for television stations. These rule modifications took effect on February 7, 2018, when the Third Circuit denied a mandamus petition which had sought to stay their effectiveness. The Reconsideration Order remains subject to an appeal before the Third Circuit.
In December 2018, the FCC initiated its 2018 quadrennial review with the issuance of a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. Among other things, the FCC seeks comment on all aspects of the local television ownership rule’s implementation and whether the current version of the rule remains necessary in the public interest. Comments and reply comments in the 2018 quadrennial review are due in the first and second quarters of 2019.
The 2016 Ownership Order reinstated a rule that attributed another in-market station toward the local television ownership limits when one station owner sells more than 15% of the second station’s weekly advertising inventory under a JSA (this rule had been previously adopted but was vacated by the Third Circuit). Parties to JSAs entered into prior to March 31, 2014 were permitted to continue to operate under these JSAs until September 30, 2025. However, in its November 2017 Reconsideration Order, the FCC eliminated the JSA attribution rule in its entirety. This elimination took effect on February 7, 2018, although the Reconsideration Order remains subject to a federal court appeal.
We cannot predict what additional rules the FCC will adopt or when they will be adopted. In addition, uncertainty about media ownership regulations and adverse economic conditions have dampened the acquisition market from time to time, and changes in the regulatory approval process may make materially more expensive, or may materially delay, the Company’s ability to close upon currently pending acquisitions or consummate further acquisitions in the future.
The FCC may decide to terminate “grandfathered” time brokerage agreements.
The FCC attributes TBAs and LMAs to the programmer under its ownership limits if the programmer provides more than 15% of a station’s weekly broadcast programming. However, TBAs and LMAs entered into prior to November 5, 1996 are exempt from attribution for now.
The FCC may review these “grandfathered” TBAs and LMAs in the future. During this review, the FCC may determine to terminate the “grandfathered” period and make all TBAs and LMAs fully attributable to the programmer. If the FCC does so, we will be required to terminate or modify our grandfathered TBAs and LMAs unless the FCC’s rules allow ownership of two stations in the applicable markets. As of December 31, 2018, we provide services under “grandfathered” TBAs or LMAs to five television stations owned by third parties.
We are subject to foreign ownership limitations which limits foreign investments in us.
The Communications Act limits the extent of non-U.S. ownership of companies that own U.S. broadcast stations. Under this restriction, the holder of a U.S. broadcast license may have no more than 20% non-U.S. ownership (by vote and by equity). The Communications Act prohibits more than 25% indirect foreign ownership or control of a licensee through a parent company unless the FCC determines the public interest will not be served by enforcement of such restriction. The FCC has interpreted this provision to require an affirmative public interest showing before indirect foreign ownership of a broadcast licensee may exceed 25%. Therefore, certain investors may be prevented from investing in us if our foreign ownership is at or near the FCC limits.
The FCC’s multiple ownership rules may limit our ability to acquire television stations in particular markets, restricting our ability to execute our acquisition strategy.
The number of television stations we may acquire in any local market or nationwide is limited by FCC rules and may vary depending upon whether the interests in other television stations or other media properties of persons affiliated with us are attributable under FCC rules. The broadcast television interests of our officers, directors and most stockholders with 5% or greater voting power are attributable under the FCC’s rules, which may limit us from acquiring or owning television stations in particular markets while those officers, directors or stockholders are associated with us. In addition, the holder of otherwise non-attributable equity and/or debt in a licensee in excess of 33% of the total debt and equity of the licensee will be attributable where the holder is either a major program supplier to that licensee or the holder has an attributable interest in another broadcast station in the same market that is subject to the FCC’s media ownership rules.
28
The Company has a material amount of goodwill and intangible assets, and therefore the Company could suffer additional losses due to future asset impairment charges.
As of December 31, 2018, $5.4 billion, or 77.0%, of the Company’s combined total assets consisted of goodwill and intangible assets, including FCC licenses and network affiliation agreements. The Company recorded an impairment charge of $19.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 attributable to the goodwill of its digital businesses. The Company tests goodwill and FCC licenses annually, and on an interim date if factors or indicators become apparent that would require an interim test of these assets, in accordance with accounting and disclosure requirements for goodwill and other intangible assets. The Company tests its finite-lived intangible assets whenever circumstances or indicators become apparent that the asset may not be recoverable through expected future cash flows. The methods used to evaluate the impairment of the Company’s goodwill and intangible assets would be affected by a significant reduction, or a forecast of such reductions, in operating results or cash flows at the Company’s broadcast business or at one or more of the Company’s digital businesses. Our broadcast business’ operating results and cash flows could be affected by a significant adverse change in the advertising marketplaces in which the Company’s television stations operate, the loss of network affiliations or by adverse changes to FCC ownership rules, among others, which may be beyond the Company’s control. Our digital business’ operating results and cash flows could be affected by intense competition, investment in technologies that are subject to a greater degree of obsolescence, significant reliance on third-party vendors to deliver services, rapid evolving nature and other factors. If the carrying amount of goodwill and intangible assets is revised downward due to impairment, such non-cash charge could materially affect the Company’s financial position and results of operations.
There can be no assurances concerning continuing dividend payments and any decrease or suspension of the dividend could cause our stock price to decline.
Our common stockholders are only entitled to receive the dividends declared by our board of directors. Our board of directors has declared in 2019 a total cash dividend with respect to the outstanding shares of our Class A common stock of $1.80 per share in equal quarterly installments of $0.45 per share. We expect to continue to pay quarterly cash dividends at the rate set forth in our current dividend policy. However, future cash dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our board of directors and can be changed or discontinued at any time. Dividend determinations (including the amount of the cash dividend, the record date and date of payment) will depend upon, among other things, our future operations and earnings, targeted future acquisitions, capital requirements and surplus, general financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors as our board of directors may deem relevant. In addition, the Company’s senior secured credit facilities and the indentures governing our existing notes limit our ability to pay dividends. Given these considerations, our board of directors may increase or decrease the amount of the dividend at any time and may also decide to suspend or discontinue the payment of cash dividends in the future.
We have made investments in digital businesses.
We have invested in various digital media businesses as well as digital offerings for each of our broadcast stations. Due to intense competition, investment in technologies that are subject to a greater degree of obsolescence, historical impairment losses on our digital assets, significant reliance on third-party vendors to deliver services, limited operating history, the rapid evolving nature of digital businesses and difficulties in integrating acquisitions into our operations, the actual future operating results could be volatile and negatively impact the year-to-year trends of our operations.
Cybersecurity risks could affect the Company’s operating effectiveness.
The Company uses computers in substantially all aspects of its business operations. Its revenues are increasingly dependent on digital products. Such use exposes the Company to potential cyber incidents resulting from deliberate attacks or unintentional events. It is not uncommon for a company such as ours to be subjected to continuous attempted cyber-attacks or other malicious efforts to cause a cyber incident. These incidents can include, but are not limited to, gaining unauthorized access to digital systems for purposes of misappropriating assets or sensitive information, corrupting data or causing operational disruption. The results of these incidents could include, but are not limited to, business interruption, disclosure of nonpublic information, decreased advertising revenues, misstated financial data, liability for stolen assets or information, increased cybersecurity protection costs, litigation and reputational damage adversely affecting customer or investor confidence. The Company’s Cybersecurity Committee helps mitigate cybersecurity risks. The role of the committee is to oversee cyber risk assessments, monitor applicable key risk indicators, review cybersecurity training procedures, establish cybersecurity policies and procedures, and to invest in and implement enhancements to the Company’s cybersecurity infrastructure. Investments over the past year included enhancements to monitoring systems, firewalls, and intrusion detection systems.
29
Risks Related to Our Industry
Our operating results are dependent on advertising revenue and as a result, we may be more vulnerable to economic downturns and other factors beyond our control than businesses not dependent on advertising.
We derive a majority of our revenue from the sale of advertising time on our stations and community portal websites. Our ability to sell advertising time depends on numerous factors that may be beyond our control, including:
|
• |
the health of the economy in the local markets where our stations are located and in the nation as a whole; |
|
• |
the popularity of our station and website programming; |
|
• |
fluctuations in pricing for local and national advertising; |
|
• |
the activities of our competitors, including increased competition from other forms of advertising-based media, particularly newspapers, cable television, Internet and radio; |
|
• |
the decreased demand for political advertising in non-election years; and |
|
• |
changes in the makeup of the population in the areas where our stations are located. |
Because businesses generally reduce their advertising budgets during economic recessions or downturns, the reliance upon advertising revenue makes our operating results susceptible to prevailing economic conditions. In addition, our programming may not attract sufficient targeted viewership, and we may not achieve favorable ratings. Our ratings depend partly upon unpredictable and volatile factors beyond our control, such as viewer preferences, competing programming and the availability of other entertainment activities. A shift in viewer preferences could cause our programming not to gain popularity or to decline in popularity, which could cause our advertising revenue to decline. Further, we and the programming providers upon which we rely may not be able to anticipate, and effectively react to, shifts in viewer tastes and interests in our markets.
Because a high percentage of our operating expense is fixed, a relatively small decrease in advertising revenue could have a significant negative impact on our financial results.
Our business is characterized generally by high fixed costs, primarily for debt service, broadcast rights and personnel. Other than commissions paid to our sales staff and outside sales agencies, our expenses do not vary significantly with an increase or decrease in advertising revenue. As a result, a relatively small change in advertising prices could have a disproportionate effect on our financial results. Accordingly, a minor shortfall in expected revenue could have a significant negative impact on our financial results.
Preemption of regularly scheduled programming by news coverage may affect our revenue and results of operations.
The Company may experience a loss of advertising revenue and incur additional broadcasting expenses due to preemption of our regularly scheduled programming by network coverage of a major global news event such as a war or terrorist attack or by coverage of local disasters, such as tornados and hurricanes. As a result, advertising may not be aired and the revenue for such advertising may be lost unless the station is able to run the advertising at agreed-upon times in the future. Advertisers may not agree to run such advertising in future time periods, and space may not be available for such advertising. The duration of any preemption of programming cannot be predicted if it occurs. In addition, our stations and the stations we provide services to may incur additional expenses as a result of expanded news coverage of a war or terrorist attack or local disaster. The loss of revenue and increased expenses could negatively affect our results of operations.
If we are unable to respond to changes in technology and evolving industry trends, our television businesses may not be able to compete effectively.
New technologies may adversely affect our television stations. Information delivery and programming alternatives such as cable, direct satellite-to-home services, pay-per-view, video on demand, over-the-top distribution of programming, the Internet, telephone company services, mobile devices, digital video recorders and home video and entertainment systems have fractionalized television viewing audiences and expanded the numbers and types of distribution channels for advertisers to access. Over the past decade, cable television programming services, other emerging video distribution platforms and the Internet have captured an increasing market share, while the aggregate viewership of the major television networks has declined. In addition, the expansion of cable and satellite television, digital delivery and other technological changes has increased, and may continue to increase, the competitive demand for programming. Such increased demand, together with rising production costs, may increase our programming costs or impair our ability to acquire or develop desired programming.
30
In addition, video compression techniques now in use are expected to permit greater numbers of channels to be carried within existing bandwidth. These compression techniques and other technological developments are applicable to all video delivery systems, including over-the-air broadcasting, and have the potential to provide vastly expanded programming to targeted audiences. Reduction in the cost of creating additional channel capacity could lower entry barriers for new channels and encourage the development of increasingly specialized niche programming, resulting in more audience fractionalization. This ability to reach very narrowly defined audiences may alter the competitive dynamics for advertising expenditures. We are unable to predict the effect that these and other technological changes will have on the television industry or our results of operations.
The FCC can sanction us for programming broadcast on our stations which it finds to be indecent.
The FCC may impose substantial fines, to a maximum of $325,000 per violation, on television broadcasters for the broadcast of indecent material in violation of the Communications Act and its rules. Because the Company’s programming is in large part comprised of programming provided by the networks with which the stations are affiliated, the Company does not have full control over what is broadcast on its stations and may be subject to the imposition of fines if the FCC finds such programming to be indecent.
In June 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court decided a challenge to the FCC’s indecency enforcement without resolving the constitutionality of such enforcement, and the FCC thereafter requested public comment on the appropriate substance and scope of its indecency enforcement policy. The FCC has issued very few further decisions or rules in this area, and the courts may in the future have further occasion to review the FCC’s current policy or any modifications thereto. The outcomes of these proceedings could affect future FCC policies in this area and could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Intense competition in the television industry and alternative forms of media could limit our growth and profitability.
As a television broadcasting company, we face a significant level of competition, both directly and indirectly. We generally compete for our audience against all the other leisure activities in which one could choose to engage rather than watch television. Specifically, stations we own or provide services to compete for audience share, programming and advertising revenue with other television stations in their respective markets and with other advertising media, including newspapers, radio stations, cable television, DBS systems, mobile services, video streaming services and the Internet.
The entertainment and television industries are highly competitive and are undergoing a period of consolidation. Many of our current and potential competitors have greater financial, marketing, programming and broadcasting resources than we do. The markets in which we operate are also in a constant state of change arising from, among other things, technological improvements and economic and regulatory developments. Technological innovation and the resulting proliferation of television entertainment, such as cable television, wireless cable, satellite-to-home distribution services, pay-per-view, home video and entertainment systems and Internet and mobile distribution of video programming have fractionalized television viewing audiences and have subjected free over-the-air television broadcast stations to increased competition. We may not be able to compete effectively or adjust our business plans to meet changing market conditions.
Technologies used in the entertainment industry continue to evolve rapidly, leading to alternative methods for the delivery and storage of digital content. These technological advancements have driven changes in consumer behavior and have empowered consumers to seek more control over when, where and how they consume news and entertainment, including through the so-called “cutting the cord” and other consumption strategies. The networks have also begun streaming some of their programming on the Internet and other distribution platforms simultaneously with, or in close proximity to, network programming broadcast on local television stations, including those we own or provide services to. These innovations and other practices by the networks dilute the exclusivity and value of network programming originally broadcast by the local stations and may adversely affect the business, financial condition and results of operations of our stations. We are unable to predict what forms of competition will develop in the future, the extent of the competition or its possible effects on our business.
The FCC could implement regulations or the U.S. Congress could adopt legislation that might have a significant impact on the operations of the stations we own and the stations we provide services to or the television broadcasting industry as a whole.
The FCC has open proceedings to determine whether to standardize TV stations’ reporting of programming responsive to local needs and interests; whether to modify its network non-duplication and syndicated exclusivity rules; whether to modify its standards for “good faith” retransmission consent negotiations; and whether to broaden the definition of “MVPD” to include “over-the-top” video programming distributors. Additionally, FCC proceedings to determine whether to modify or eliminate certain of its broadcast ownership rules are the subject of pending court appeals, and the FCC has initiated its next quadrennial proceeding to review the agency’s media ownership rules.
31
The FCC also has sought comment on whether there are alternatives to the use of DMAs to define local markets such that certain viewers whose current DMAs straddle multiple states would be provided with more in-state broadcast programming. If the FCC determines to modify the use of existing DMAs to determine a station’s local market, such change might materially alter current station operations and could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The FCC also may decide to initiate other new rule-making proceedings on its own or in response to requests from outside parties, any of which might have such an impact. The U.S. Congress may also act to amend the Communications Act in a manner that could impact our stations and the stations we provide services to or the television broadcast industry in general.
The FCC is reallocating a portion of the spectrum available for use by television broadcasters to wireless broadband use, which could substantially impact our future operations and may reduce viewer access to our programming.
The FCC is in the process of repurposing a portion of the broadcast television spectrum for wireless broadband use. Pursuant to federal legislation enacted in 2012, the FCC conducted an incentive auction for the purpose of making additional spectrum available to meet future wireless broadband needs. Under the auction statute and rules, certain television broadcasters accepted bids from the FCC to voluntarily relinquish all or part of their spectrum in exchange for consideration, and certain wireless broadband providers and other entities submitted successful bids to acquire the relinquished television spectrum. Over the next several years, television stations that are not relinquishing their spectrum are being “repacked” into the frequency band still remaining for television broadcast use.
The incentive auction commenced on March 29, 2016 and officially concluded on April 13, 2017. Ten of Nexstar’s stations and one station owned by Vaughan, a consolidated VIE, accepted bids to relinquish their spectrum. Of these 11 total stations, one station went off the air in November 2017. The station that went off the air is not expected to have a significant impact on our future financial results because it is located in a remote rural area of the country and the Company has other stations which serve the same area. Of the remaining ten stations, eight have ceased broadcasting on their current channels and implemented channel sharing arrangements. The remaining two stations moving to very high frequency (“VHF”) channels must vacate their current channels by September 2019 and May 2020, respectively.
The majority of the Company’s television stations did not accept bids to relinquish their television channels. Of those stations, 61 full power stations owned by Nexstar and 17 full power stations owned by VIEs have been assigned to new channels in the reduced post-auction television band. These “repacked” stations are required to construct and license the necessary technical modifications to operate on their new assigned channels and must cease operating on their former channels, by deadlines which the FCC has established and which are no later than July 13, 2020. Congress has allocated up to an industry-wide total of $2.75 billion to reimburse television broadcasters, MVPDs and other parties for costs reasonably incurred due to the repack. This allocation includes $1 billion added to the TV Broadcaster Relocation Fund as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018. This fund is not available to reimburse repacking costs for stations which are surrendering their spectrum and entering into channel sharing relationships. Broadcasters and MVPDs have submitted estimates to the FCC of their reimbursable costs. As of February 6, 2019, these costs were approximately $1.9 billion, and the FCC has indicated that it expects those costs to rise. In 2018 and 2017, the Company spent a total of $29.4 million in capital expenditures related to station repack, all of which have been reimbursed by the FCC in 2018. As of December 31, 2018, approximately $192.0 million of estimated remaining costs in connection with the station repack are expected to be incurred by the Company, some or all of which will be reimbursable. We cannot determine if the FCC will be able to fully reimburse our repacking costs as this is dependent on certain factors, including our ability to incur repacking costs that are equal to or less than the FCC’s allocation of funds to us and whether the FCC will have available funds to reimburse us for additional repacking costs that we previously may not have anticipated. Whether the FCC will have available funds for additional reimbursements will also depend on the repacking costs that will be incurred by other broadcasters, MVPDs and other parties that are also seeking reimbursements.
The reallocation of television spectrum to broadband use may be to the detriment of our investment in digital facilities, could require substantial additional investment to continue our current operations, and may require viewers to invest in additional equipment or subscription services to continue receiving broadcast television signals. We cannot predict the impact of the incentive auction and subsequent repacking on our business.
Item 1B. |
Unresolved Staff Comments |
None.
32
Item 2. |
Properties |
We have office space for our corporate headquarters in Irving, TX, which is leased through 2024. Each of our markets has facilities consisting of offices, studios, sales offices and tower and transmitter sites. We own approximately 61% of our office and studio locations and approximately 44% of our tower and transmitter locations. The remaining properties that we utilize are leased. We consider all of our properties, together with equipment contained therein, to be adequate for our present needs. We continually evaluate our future needs and from time to time will undertake significant projects to replace or upgrade facilities.
While none of our owned or leased properties are individually material to our operations, if we were required to relocate any towers, the cost could be significant. This is because the number of sites in any geographic area that permit a tower of reasonable height to provide good coverage of the market is limited, and zoning and other land use restrictions, as well as Federal Aviation Administration and FCC regulations, limit the number of alternative locations or increase the cost of acquiring them for tower sites. See Item 1, “Business—The Stations” for a complete list of stations by market.
Item 3. |
Legal Proceedings |
From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation that arises from the ordinary course of business, such as contractual or employment disputes or other general actions. In the event of an adverse outcome of these legal proceedings, the Company believes the resulting liabilities would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
On March 16, 2018, a group of companies including Nexstar (the “Defendants”) received a Civil Investigative Demand from the Antitrust Division of the DOJ regarding an investigation into the exchange of certain information related to the pacing of sales related to the same period in the prior year among broadcast stations in some DMAs in alleged violation of federal antitrust law. Other Defendants entered into a proposed consent decree with the DOJ on November 6, 2018. Without admitting any wrongdoing, Nexstar agreed to settle the matter with the DOJ on December 5, 2018. The DOJ filed an amended complaint adding Nexstar to the consent decree on December 13, 2018. The consent decree, which settles any claims by the government of alleged violations of federal antitrust laws in connection with the alleged information sharing, does not include any financial penalty. Pursuant to the consent decree, we have agreed not to exchange certain non-public information with other stations operating in the same DMA except in certain cases, to implement certain antitrust compliance measures and to monitor and report on compliance with the consent decree.
On July 30, 2018, Clay, Massey & Associates, PC filed an antitrust class action complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated against Gray Television, Inc., Hearst Communications, Nexstar Media Group, Inc., Tegna Inc., Tribune Media Company and Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. The lawsuit alleges unlawful coordination between broadcast television station owners to artificially increase prices of television spot advertisements in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. §1). Nexstar has since been named in 15 similar complaints, including ten in the Northern District of Illinois, three in the Southern District of New York, and two in the District of Maryland. Each complaint includes similar allegations and claims a violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. One, filed in the District of Maryland, also alleges violations of state antitrust and consumer protection statutes and a claim for unjust enrichment.
On October 9, 2018, these cases were consolidated in a multi-district litigation in the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois captioned In Re: Local TV Advertising Antitrust Litigation, No. 1:18-cv-06785 (“MDL Litigation”). On January 23, 2019, the Court in the MDL Litigation appointed plaintiffs’ lead and liaison counsel. The MDL Litigation is ongoing. Nexstar denies the allegations against it and will defend its advertising practices as necessary.
Item 4. |
Mine Safety Disclosures |
None.
33
PART II
Item 5. |
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
Market Prices; Record Holders and Dividends
Our Class A Common Stock trades on The NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”) under the symbol “NXST.”
As of February 26, 2019, there were approximately 24,000 shareholders of record of our Class A Common Stock, including shares held in nominee names by brokers and other institutions.
Pursuant to our current dividend policy, our board of directors declared in 2018, 2017 and 2016 total annual cash dividends of $1.50 per share, $1.20 per share and $0.96 per share, respectively, with respect to outstanding shares of our Class A common stock. The dividends were paid in equal quarterly installments.
On January 25, 2019, our board of directors approved a 20% increase in the quarterly cash dividend to $0.45 per share of outstanding Class A Common Stock beginning with the first quarter of 2019. Dividend determinations will depend upon, among other things, our future operations and earnings, targeted future acquisitions, capital requirements and surplus, general financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors as our board of directors may deem relevant. Additionally, the Company’s senior secured credit facilities and the indentures governing its existing notes limit its ability to pay dividends. Given these considerations, our board of directors may increase or decrease the amount of dividends at any time and may also decide to suspend or discontinue the payment of cash dividends in the future.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
None.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans as of December 31, 2018
Plan Category |
|
Number of |
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Number of securities |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
|
1,809,268 |
|
|
|
$21.92 |
|
|
|
853,813 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total |
|
1,809,268 |
|
|
|
$21.92 |
|
|
|
853,813 |
|
For a more detailed description of our equity plans and grants, we refer you to Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part IV, Item 15(a) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
34
Comparative Stock Performance Graph
The following graph compares the total return of our Class A Common Stock based on closing prices for the period from December 31, 2013 through December 31, 2018 with the total return of the NASDAQ Composite Index and our peer index of pure play television companies. Our peer index consists of the following publicly traded companies: Gray Television, Inc., Tegna, Inc. and Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. The graph assumes the investment of $100 in our Class A Common Stock and in both of the indices on December 31, 2013, with the reinvestment of dividends into shares of our Class A Common Stock or the indices, as applicable. The performance shown is not necessarily indicative of future performance.
|
|
12/31/13
|
|
|
|
12/31/14
|
|
|
|
12/31/15
|
|
|
|
12/31/16
|
|
|
|
12/31/17
|
|
|
|
12/31/18
|
|
Nexstar Media Group, Inc. (NXST) |
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
$ |
94.26 |
|
|
$ |
108.36 |
|
|
$ |
119.32 |
|
|
$ |
150.20 |
|
|
$ |
154.16 |
|
NASDAQ Composite Index |
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
$ |
114.75 |
|
|
$ |
122.74 |
|
|
$ |
133.62 |
|
|
$ |
173.22 |
|
|
$ |
168.30 |
|
Peer Group |
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
$ |
97.60 |
|
|
$ |
105.49 |
|
|
$ |
94.39 |
|
|
$ |
106.95 |
|
|
$ |
82.47 |
|
35
Item 6. |
Selected Financial Data |
The selected consolidated financial data as of and for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014 are presented in the table below. The period-to-period comparability of our consolidated financial statements is affected by acquisitions. In 2018, we acquired or began services to five full power television stations and acquired one digital media business. In 2017, we acquired or began services to 65 full power television stations, net of station divestitures, and acquired two digital businesses. In 2016, we acquired nine full power television stations, including consolidated VIEs. In 2015, we acquired 14 full power television stations, including consolidated VIEs, and two digital media businesses. This information should be read in conjunction with Part II, Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes included herein. Amounts below are presented in thousands, except per share amounts.
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|||||
Statements of Operations Data, for the years ended December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
2,766,696 |
|
|
$ |
2,431,966 |
|
|
$ |
1,103,190 |
|
|
$ |
896,377 |
|
|
$ |
631,311 |
|
Operating expenses (income): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate expenses |
|
|
110,921 |
|
|
|
138,394 |
|
|
|
51,177 |
|
|
|
44,856 |
|
|
|
35,174 |
|
Direct operating expenses, net of trade |
|
|
1,101,423 |
|
|
|
978,930 |
|
|
|
371,242 |
|
|
|
293,288 |
|
|
|
178,781 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding corporate |
|
|
469,012 |
|
|
|
466,712 |
|
|
|
212,429 |
|
|
|
187,624 |
|
|
|
140,255 |
|
Trade and barter expense |
|
|
16,494 |
|
|
|
56,970 |
|
|
|
45,439 |
|
|
|
46,651 |
|
|
|
31,333 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
109,789 |
|
|
|
100,658 |
|
|
|
51,300 |
|
|
|
47,222 |
|
|
|
35,047 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
149,406 |
|
|
|
159,500 |
|
|
|
46,572 |
|
|
|
48,475 |
|
|
|
25,850 |
|
Amortization of broadcast rights, excluding barter |
|
|
61,342 |
|
|
|
62,908 |
|
|
|
22,461 |
|
|
|
22,154 |
|
|
|
11,634 |
|
Goodwill and intangible assets impairment(1) |
|
|
19,911 |
|
|
|
19,985 |
|
|
|
15,262 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Gain on disposal of stations, net(2) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(57,716 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Reimbursement from the FCC related to station repack(3) |
|
|
(29,381 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
2,008,917 |
|
|
|
1,926,341 |
|
|
|
815,882 |
|
|
|
690,270 |
|
|
|
458,074 |
|
Income from operations(4) |
|
|
757,779 |
|
|
|
505,625 |
|
|
|
287,308 |
|
|
|
206,107 |
|
|
|
173,237 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(220,994 |
) |
|
|
(241,195 |
) |
|
|
(116,081 |
) |
|
|
(80,520 |
) |
|
|
(61,959 |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net(5) |
|
|
(12,120 |
) |
|
|
(34,882 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
Pension and other postretirement plans credit, net(6) |
|
|
10,755 |
|
|
|
13,120 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
(2,475 |
) |
|
|
(1,284 |
) |
|
|
(555 |
) |
|
|
(517 |
) |
|
|
(556 |
) |
Income before income taxes |
|
|
532,945 |
|
|
|
241,384 |
|
|
|
170,672 |
|
|
|
125,070 |
|
|
|
110,651 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit(7) |
|
|
(144,680 |
) |
|
|
233,943 |
|
|
|
(77,572 |
) |
|
|
(48,687 |
) |
|
|
(46,101 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
388,265 |
|
|
|
475,327 |
|
|
|
93,100 |
|
|
|
76,383 |
|
|
|
64,550 |
|
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
1,212 |
|
|
|
(330 |
) |
|
|
(1,563 |
) |
|
|
1,301 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net income attributable to Nexstar Media Group, Inc. |
|
$ |
389,477 |
|
|
$ |
474,997 |
|
|
$ |
91,537 |
|
|
$ |
77,684 |
|
|
$ |
64,550 |
|
Net income per common share attributable to Nexstar Media Group, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
8.52 |
|
|
$ |
10.38 |
|
|
$ |
2.98 |
|
|
$ |
2.50 |
|
|
$ |
2.10 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
8.21 |
|
|
$ |
10.07 |
|
|
$ |
2.89 |
|
|
$ |
2.42 |
|
|
$ |
2.02 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
45,718 |
|
|
|
45,754 |
|
|
|
30,687 |
|
|
|
31,100 |
|
|
|
30,774 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
47,412 |
|
|
|
47,149 |
|
|
|
31,664 |
|
|
|
32,091 |
|
|
|
32,003 |
|
(1) |
Certain of our digital businesses recognized impairment charges related to goodwill and finite-lived intangible assets during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016. For additional information, refer to Note 5 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV, Item 15(a) of this Form 10-K. |
(2) |
In connection with our merger with Media General on January 17 ,2017, we sold the assets of 12 full power television stations in 12 markets, five of which were previously owned by us and seven of which were previously owned by Media General. These divestitures resulted in a $57.7 million net gain on disposals. |
(3) |
Certain of the Company’s stations have been assigned with new channels (“repack”) in connection with the FCC’s process of repurposing a portion of the broadcast television spectrum for wireless broadband use. These stations are currently spending costs, mainly capital expenditures, to construct and license the necessary technical modifications to operate on their newly assigned channels and to vacate their former channels no later than July 13, 2020. Subject to fund limitations, the FCC reimburses television broadcasters, MVPDs and other parties for costs reasonably incurred due to the repack. The reimbursements received by the Company from the FCC were recognized as operating income in 2018. |
(4) |
Income from operations is generally higher during even-numbered years, when advertising revenue is increased due to the occurrence of state and federal elections and the Olympic Games. However, due to the accretive acquisitions in 2014 through 2018, the income from operations increased over time. |
(5) |
In October 2018, the Company refinanced its then existing term loans and revolving loans. The Company also made prepayments of its outstanding term loans during 2018. These transactions resulted in total loss on extinguishment of debt of $12.1 million. In January 2017, the Company refinanced its then existing term loans and revolving loans. In February 2017, the Company called the entire principal balance of its $525.0 million 6.875% Notes, resulting in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $22.2 million. The Company also made prepayments of its outstanding term loans during 2017. These transactions, resulted in total loss on extinguishment of debt of $34.9 million. |
(6) |
The Company previously reported its pension and other postretirement benefit credit, consisting of expected return on plan assets and interest cost, as a credit to corporate expenses. As discussed in Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV, Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company adopted ASU 2017-07 which requires presentation of net periodic benefit cost, other than service costs, as a separate line item below income from operations. The adoption of ASU 2017-17 reduced the operating income in 2017 by $13.2 million but did not impact net income. |
(7) |
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 was signed into law which reduced the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. The reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate resulted in a reduction of the Company’s net deferred tax liability of $322.2 million and a corresponding deferred income tax benefit in 2017. |
36
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|||||
Balance Sheet data, as of December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
145,115 |
|
|
$ |
115,652 |
|
|
$ |
87,680 |
|
|
$ |
43,416 |
|
|
$ |
131,912 |
|
Working capital |
|
|
362,903 |
|
|
|
385,515 |
|
|
|
173,639 |
|
|
|
113,967 |
|
|
|
178,661 |
|
Net intangible assets and goodwill |
|
|
5,438,145 |
|
|
|
5,492,110 |
|
|
|
1,340,565 |
|
|
|
1,255,358 |
|
|
|
772,660 |
|
Total assets(1)(2) |
|
|
7,062,030 |
|
|
|
7,481,647 |
|
|
|
2,966,085 |
|
|
|
1,835,134 |
|
|
|
1,414,102 |
|
Total debt(1)(2) |
|
|
3,981,003 |
|
|
|
4,362,460 |
|
|
|
2,342,419 |
|
|
|
1,476,214 |
|
|
|
1,220,369 |
|
Total stockholders’ equity |
|
|
1,868,984 |
|
|
|
1,581,310 |
|
|
|
284,354 |
|
|
|
86,373 |
|
|
|
56,537 |
|
Statements of Cash Flows data, for the years ended December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities(3) |
|
$ |
736,867 |
|
|
$ |
109,091 |
|
|
$ |
284,253 |
|
|
$ |
205,308 |
|
|
$ |
176,561 |
|
Investing activities(3) |
|
|
(175,514 |
) |
|
|
(2,066,285 |
) |
|
|
(135,122 |
) |
|
|
(474,341 |
) |
|
|
(230,033 |
) |
Financing activities(3) |
|
|
(531,890 |
) |
|
|
1,057,367 |
|
|
|
822,932 |
|
|
|
180,537 |
|
|
|
145,356 |
|
Capital expenditures, net of proceeds from asset disposals(4) |
|
|
101,902 |
|
|
|
52,435 |
|
|
|
31,152 |
|
|
|
25,397 |
|
|
|
20,300 |
|
Cash payments for broadcast rights |
|
|
61,979 |
|
|
|
62,531 |
|
|
|
23,004 |
|
|
|
22,473 |
|
|
|
12,025 |
|
(1) |
The Company’s total assets and total debt increased in January 2017 following the consummation of our merger with Media General. Refer to Notes 3 and 7 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV, Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information. |
(2) |
On July 27, 2016, we completed the issuance and sale of $900.0 million of 5.625% Notes. The gross proceeds of the notes, plus pre-funded interests, were deposited into a segregated escrow account until their utilization in January 2017 to partially finance our merger with Media General. Refer to Note 7 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV, Item 5(a) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information on the 5.625% Notes. |
(3) |
As discussed in Note 2 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV, Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company adopted the FASB ASU No. 2016-15, which provides guidance related to classification on the statement of cash flows of certain cash receipts and cash payments, and the FASB ASU 2016-18, which provides guidance related to classification on the statement of cash flows of restricted cash. These adoptions changed the cash flow reporting of certain transactions of the Company between 2017 and 2016. Accordingly, our current presentation of the 2017 net cash provided by operating activities, and net cash provided by financing activities decreased by $27.6 million and $896.0 million, respectively, compared to amounts previously presented. Our 2017 net cash in investing activities increased by $4.2 million. Also, our current presentation of the 2016 net cash provided by operating activities and net cash provided by financing activities increased by $22.7 million and $900.00 million, respectively, and our 2016 net cash used in investing activities decreased by $5.1 million. |
(4) |
In 2018, our capital expenditures included $26.8 million, which we reimbursed from the FCC in connection with the station repack. It also included capital expenditures of $2.9 million, which was funded by the proceeds from the incentive auction received in 2017. |
37
Item 7. |
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with Item 6. “Selected Financial Data” and our Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes included in Part IV, Item 15(a) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
As a result of our deemed controlling financial interests in the consolidated VIEs in accordance with U.S. GAAP, we consolidate the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of these VIEs as if they were wholly-owned entities. We believe this presentation is meaningful for understanding our financial performance. Refer to Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of our determinations of VIE consolidation under the related authoritative guidance. The following discussion of our financial position and results of operations includes the consolidated VIEs’ financial position and results of operations.
Executive Summary
2018 Highlights
|
• |
Net revenue during 2018 increased by $334.7 million, or 13.8% compared to the same period in 2017. The increase in net revenue was primarily due to an increase in political advertising and retransmission compensation of $221.2 million and $82.9 million, respectively, from our legacy stations and incremental revenue from our newly acquired stations and entities of $121.4 million. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in our legacy stations’ revenue from local and national advertising of $41.5 million, primarily due to changes in the mix between our local, national, and political advertising during an election year. Our adoption of the new revenue accounting guidance also decreased our barter revenue (and the related barter expense) by $42.5 million, but did not impact our income from operations, our net income or our cash flows. |
|
• |
During 2018, our Board of Directors declared quarterly dividends of $0.375 per share of our outstanding common stock, or total dividend payments of $68.6 million. |
|
• |
During 2018, we repurchased a total of 751,920 shares of our Class A common stock for $50.5 million, funded by cash on hand. On April 26, 2018, our Board of Directors approved an increase in our share repurchase authorization to repurchase up to an additional $200.0 million of our Class A common stock. As of December 31, 2018, the remaining available amount under the share repurchase authorization was $201.9 million, inclusive of the 2018 additional authorization and the remaining balance under our prior authorization. |
2018 Acquisitions
|
Acquisition Date |
Purchase Price |
Assets Acquired |
LKQD |
January 16, 2018 |
$97.0 million in cash |
Acquired the outstanding equity of LKQD. |
WHDF |
First closing on July 15, 2018 Second closing on November 9, 2018 |
$2.3 million paid in cash at first closing $0.7 million paid in cash at second closing |
Acquired the assets of WHDF, a full power television station in the Huntsville, Alabama market and an affiliate of CW. |
KRBK |
First closing on August 1, 2018 Second closing on November 1, 2018 |
$15.1 million paid in cash at first closing $2.5 million paid in cash at second closing |
Acquired the assets of KRBK, a full power television station in the Springfield, Missouri market and an affiliate of FOX. |
KHII |
Provided certain services through TBA effective on November 1, 2018 Completed the station acquisition on January 28, 2019 |
$0.1 million paid in cash as advance payment
$6.4 million paid in cash at final closing |
We consolidated certain assets of KHII in December 2018 due to our controlling financial interest. KHII is a full power television station affiliated with MNTV in the Honolulu, Hawaii market and its satellite stations KGMV serving Wailuku, Hawaii and KGMD serving Hilo, Hawaii markets. |
The purchase price for the LKQD acquisition was funded by a combination of a borrowing under our revolving credit facility and cash on hand. The acquisition of LKQD broadened and diversified our digital portfolio with technologies that are complementary to our current offerings of digital solutions and services for media publishers, and multi-platform marketing solutions for local and national advertisers.
38
The purchase prices to acquire WHDF and KRBK were funded by cash on hand. These acquisitions created two new duopolies for Nexstar. We previously provided programming and sales services to these stations under TBAs from July 15, 2018 through November 9, 2018 for WHDF and from August 1, 2018 through November 1, 2018 for KRBK.
Effective November 1, 2018, we began managing some elements of KHII’s operation under a TBA until the completion of the acquisition. On December 17, 2018, we obtained FCC approval for the acquisition and became the primary beneficiary of our variable interests in KHII. Therefore, as of this date, the stations’ assets that we agreed to acquire pursuant to a purchase agreement, and transactions thereafter, were consolidated into our financial statements. On January 28, 2019, we completed the acquisition and paid the remaining purchase price of $6.4 million, funded by cash on hand. The TBA with KHII was terminated as of this date.
Merger Agreement with Tribune
On November 30, 2018, we entered into a definitive merger agreement with Tribune to acquire Tribune’s outstanding equity for $46.50 per share in a cash transaction. All equity-based awards of Tribune that are outstanding prior to the merger will vest in full and will be converted into the right to receive the same cash consideration. The estimated total purchase price is valued at $6.4 billion, consisting of the merger cash consideration and the refinancing of Tribune's outstanding debt. Tribune shareholders will be entitled to additional cash consideration of approximately $0.30 per share per month if the transaction has not closed by August 31, 2019, pro-rated for partial months and less an adjustment for any dividends declared on or after September 1, 2019. Tribune currently owns, operates or provides services to 42 television stations. We and Tribune plan to divest certain of our stations in connection with the proposed merger in order to comply with FCC media ownership rules.
The merger agreement contains certain termination rights for both us and Tribune. If the merger agreement is terminated in connection with Tribune entering into a definitive agreement with respect to a superior proposal, as well as under certain other circumstances, the termination fee payable by Tribune to us will be $135 million. If the merger agreement is terminated because the required Tribune stockholder vote is not obtained at a stockholder meeting duly held for such purpose, Tribune will be required to reimburse us for our costs and expenses incurred in connection with the transaction in an amount not to exceed $15 million. Either party may terminate the merger agreement if the merger is not consummated on or before an end date of November 30, 2019, with an automatic extension to February 29, 2020, if necessary to obtain regulatory approval under circumstances specified in the merger agreement.
The merger has been approved by the boards of directors of both companies and is projected to close late in the third quarter of 2019, subject to (i) the approval of the merger by the stockholders of Tribune, (ii) FCC approval, (iii) other regulatory approvals (including expiration of the applicable HSR waiting period) and (iv) satisfaction of other customary closing conditions. The merger does not require approval of our stockholders and is not subject to any financing contingency. On November 30, 2018, we received committed financing up to a maximum of $6.4 billion from a group of commercial banks to provide the debt financing to consummate the merger and the refinancing of certain of the existing indebtedness of Tribune and related transactions.
In connection with obtaining the HSR approval and the FCC approval, Nexstar agreed to divest one or more television stations in certain DMAs. Those DMAs are: (i) Salt Lake City, UT; (ii) Grand Rapids-Kalamazoo-Battle Creek, MI; (iii) Wilkes Barre-Scranton, PA; (iv) Richmond-Petersburg, VA; (v) Des Moines-Ames, IA; (vi) Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News, VA; (vii) Fort Smith-Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR; (viii) Davenport, IA-Rock Island-Moline, IL; (ix) Memphis, TN; (x) Huntsville-Decatur (Florence), AL; (xi) Indianapolis, IN; (xii) Hartford-New Haven, CT and (xiii) Harrisburg, PA. Nexstar is required to designate one or more Tribune stations or Nexstar stations for divestiture in each DMA. Nexstar has also agreed to designate, at its option, certain additional Tribune stations or Nexstar stations for divestiture and to divest such stations in order to comply with the FCC national cap as required by the FCC in order to obtain approval of and consummate the transactions.
2018 Debt Transactions
|
• |
On January 16, 2018, we borrowed $44.0 million under our revolving credit facility to fund the acquisition of LKQD. Through June 2018, we repaid the entire $44.0 million principal balance under our revolving credit facility, funded by cash on hand. |
|
• |
In June 2018, Marshall refinanced the outstanding principal balances under its Term Loan A and revolving credit facility of $48.8 million and $3.0 million, respectively, funded by a new Term Loan A of $51.8 million due on December 1, 2019. |
|
• |
On July 27, 2018, we reallocated $5.6 million of our unused revolving loan credit facility to Marshall. On the same day, Marshall drew the full $5.6 million revolving loan facility and used the funds to partially repay its outstanding Term Loan A. |
39
|
• |
On October 26, 2018, the Company completed a refinancing of certain of its senior secured credit facilities, including (i) Nexstar’s and Mission’s Term Loan B with outstanding principal balances of $1.579 billion and $228.5 million, respectively, (ii) Nexstar’s and Shield’s Term Loan A with outstanding principal balances of $679.5 million and $23.0 million, respectively, and (iii) Nexstar’s and Mission’s revolving credit facilities of $163.4 million and $3.0 million, respectively, of which no amounts were drawn. The amendments extended the maturity date of Term Loan A and revolving credit facilities from July 19, 2022 to October 26, 2023 and reduced the applicable margin portion of the interest rates by 25 basis points for Term Loan B, Term Loan A and revolving loans. The maturity date of Term Loan B did not change (January 17, 2024). Nexstar also borrowed an additional $150.0 million Term Loan A under its amended senior secured credit facility. The proceeds were used to partially repay the outstanding principal balance of Nexstar’s Term Loan B of $150.0 million. Nexstar continues to guarantee Mission’s and Shield’s obligations, and Mission continues to guarantee Nexstar’s obligations under the amended senior secured credit facilities. |
|
• |
In 2018, we prepaid a total of $360.0 million in principal balance under our Term Loan B, funded by cash on hand. |
|
• |
Through December 2018, the Company repaid scheduled maturities of $46.6 million under its term loans. |
Overview of Operations
As of December 31, 2018, we owned, operated, programmed or provided sales and other services to 174 full power television stations, including those owned by VIEs, in 100 markets in the states of Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia and Wisconsin. The stations are affiliates of ABC, NBC, FOX, CBS, The CW, MNTV and other broadcast television networks. Through various local service agreements, we provided sales, programming and other services to 39 full power television stations owned by independent third parties, of which 38 full power television stations are VIEs that are consolidated into our financial statements. See Note 2—Variable Interest Entities to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of the local service agreements we have with these independent third parties.
The operating revenue of our stations is derived substantially from broadcast and website advertising revenue, which is affected by a number of factors, including the economic conditions of the markets in which we operate, the demographic makeup of those markets and the marketing strategy we employ in each market. Most advertising contracts are short-term and generally run for a few weeks. For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, revenue generated from local broadcast advertising represented 73.2% and 72.9%, respectively, of our consolidated spot revenue (total of local and national broadcast advertising revenue, excluding political advertising revenue). The remaining broadcast advertising revenue represents inventory sold for national or political advertising. All national and political revenue is derived from advertisements placed through advertising agencies. While the majority of local spot revenue is placed by local agencies, some advertisers place their schedules directly with the stations’ local sales staff, thereby eliminating the agency commission. Each station also has an agreement with a national representative firm that provides for sales representation outside the particular station’s market. Advertising schedules received through the national representative firm are for national or large regional accounts that advertise in several markets simultaneously. National representative commission rates vary within the industry and are governed by each station’s agreement.
Another source of revenue for the Company that has grown significantly in recent years relates to retransmission of our station signals by cable, satellite and other MVPDs. MVPDs generally pay for retransmission rights on a rate per subscriber basis. The growth of this revenue stream was primarily due to increases in the subscriber rates paid by MVPDs resulting from contract renewals (retransmission compensation agreements generally have a three-year term), scheduled annual escalation of rates per subscriber, and the establishment of distribution agreements with OTTDs. Additionally, the rates per subscriber of newly acquired television stations are converted into our terms which are typically higher than those of other companies because we have been negotiating such agreements for a longer period of time and are, therefore, approximately one full negotiating cycle ahead of our competitors. Currently, broadcasters deliver more than 30% of all television viewing audiences in a pay television household but are paid approximately 12-14% of the total cable programming fees. Nexstar anticipates retransmission fees will continue to increase until there is a more balanced relationship between viewers delivered and fees paid for delivery of such viewers.
Most of our stations have a network affiliation agreement pursuant to which the network provides programming to the station during specified time periods, including prime time, in exchange for affiliation fees paid to the networks, in most cases, and the right to sell a substantial majority of the advertising time during these broadcasts. Network affiliation fees have been increasing industry wide and we expect they will continue to increase over the next several years.
40
Each station acquires licenses to broadcast programming in non-news and non-network time periods. The licenses are either purchased from a program distributor for cash and/or the program distributor is allowed to sell some of the advertising inventory as compensation to eliminate or reduce the cash cost for the license. The latter practice is referred to as barter broadcast rights. Barter broadcast rights were previously recorded as assets and amortized as programming expense over the earlier of the license period or period of usage. Upon adoption of the new revenue accounting guidance that took effect on January 1, 2018, we no longer recognize assets and expense resulting from these transactions. Refer to Note 2 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV, Item 5(a) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.
Our primary operating expenses include employee salaries, commissions and benefits, newsgathering and programming costs. A large percentage of the costs involved in the operation of our stations and the stations we provide services to remains relatively fixed.
We guarantee full payment of all obligations incurred under Mission’s, Marshall’s and Shield’s senior secured credit facilities in the event of their default. Mission is a guarantor of our senior secured credit facility, our 6.125% Notes and our 5.625% Notes but does not guarantee our 5.875% Notes. Marshall and Shield do not guarantee any debt within the group. In consideration of our guarantee of Mission’s senior secured credit facility, Mission has granted us purchase options to acquire the assets and assume the liabilities of each Mission station, subject to FCC consent. These option agreements (which expire on various dates between 2021 and 2028) are freely exercisable or assignable by us without consent or approval by Mission or its shareholders. We expect these option agreements to be renewed upon expiration.
We do not own the consolidated VIEs or their television stations. However, we are deemed under U.S. GAAP to have controlling financial interests in these entities because of (1) the local service agreements Nexstar has with their stations, (2) our guarantees of the obligations incurred under Mission’s, Marshall’s and Shield’s senior secured credit facilities, (3) our power over significant activities affecting the VIEs’ economic performance, including budgeting for advertising revenue, advertising sales and, in some cases, hiring and firing of sales force personnel and (4) purchase options granted by each VIE, exclusive of Marshall, which permit Nexstar to acquire the assets and assume the liabilities of each of the VIEs’ stations at any time, subject to FCC consent. In compliance with FCC regulations for all the parties, each of the consolidated VIEs maintain complete responsibility for and control over programming, finances and personnel for their stations. Refer to Note 2 – Variable Interest Entities to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV, Item 5(a) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information with respect to consolidated VIEs.
Regulatory Developments
As a television broadcaster, the Company is highly regulated, and its operations require that it retain or renew a variety of government approvals and comply with changing federal regulations. In 2016, the FCC reinstated a rule providing that a television station licensee which sells more than 15 percent of the weekly advertising inventory of another television station in the same DMA is deemed to have an attributable ownership interest in that station (this rule had been adopted in 2014 but was vacated by a federal court of appeals). Parties to existing JSAs that were deemed attributable interests and did not comply with the FCC’s local television ownership rule were given until September 30, 2025 to come into compliance. In November 2017, however, the FCC adopted an order on reconsideration that eliminated the rule. That elimination became effective on February 7, 2018, although the FCC’s November 2017 order on reconsideration remains the subject of pending court appeals. If the Company is ultimately required to amend or terminate its existing agreements, the Company could have a reduction in revenue and increased costs if it is unable to successfully implement alternative arrangements that are as beneficial as the existing JSAs.
The FCC is in the process of repurposing a portion of the broadcast television spectrum for wireless broadband use. In an incentive auction which concluded in April 2017, certain television broadcasters accepted bids from the FCC to voluntarily relinquish all or part of their spectrum in exchange for consideration. Television stations that are not relinquishing their spectrum are being “repacked” into the frequency band still remaining for television broadcast use. In July 2017, the Company received $478.6 million in gross proceeds from the FCC for eight stations that now share a channel with another station, two that will move to a VHF channel and one that went off the air in November 2017. The station that went off the air is not expected to have a significant impact on our future financial results because it is located in a remote rural area of the country and the Company has other stations which serve the same area. The two stations moving to VHF channels must vacate their current channels by September 2019 and May 2020, respectively.
61 full power stations owned by Nexstar and 17 full power stations owned by VIEs have been assigned to new channels in the reduced post-auction television band and will be required to construct and license the necessary technical modifications to operate on their new assigned channels on a variable schedule ending in July 2020. Congress has allocated up to an industry-wide total of $2.75 billion to reimburse television broadcasters, MVPDs and other parties for costs reasonably incurred due to the repack. In 2018 and 2017, the Company spent a total of $29.4 million in capital expenditures related to station repack, all of which have been reimbursed by the FCC in 2018. As of December 31, 2018, approximately $192.0 million of estimated remaining costs in connection with the station repack are expected to be incurred by the Company, some or all of which will be reimbursable. If the FCC fails to fully reimburse the Company’s repacking costs, the Company could have increased costs related to the repacking.
41
Seasonality
Advertising revenue is positively affected by national and regional political election campaigns and certain events such as the Olympic Games or the Super Bowl. Advertising revenue is generally highest in the second and fourth quarters of each year, due in part to increases in consumer advertising in the spring and retail advertising in the period leading up to, and including, the holiday season. In addition, advertising revenue is generally higher during even-numbered years, when state, congressional and presidential elections occur and from advertising aired during the Olympic Games. 2018 was an election year and an Olympic year.
Historical Performance
Revenue
The following table sets forth the amounts of the Company’s principal types of revenue (in thousands) and each type of revenue (other than trade and barter) and agency commissions as a percentage of total revenue for the years ended December 31:
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
Previously Reported |
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
Current Presentation |
|
|
% |
|
|
Previously Reported |
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
Current Presentation |
|
|
% |
|
||||||||||
Local |
|
$ |
797,709 |
|
|
|
28.8 |
|
|
$ |
913,571 |
|
|
$ |
(108,211 |
) |
|
$ |
805,360 |
|
|
|
33.1 |
|
|
$ |
388,183 |
|
|
$ |
(43,827 |
) |
|
$ |
344,356 |
|
|
|
32.7 |
|
National |
|
|
292,211 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
356,633 |
|
|
|
(53,976 |
) |
|
|
302,657 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
144,009 |
|
|
|
(21,689 |
) |
|
|
122,320 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
Political |
|
|
251,209 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
31,605 |
|
|
|
(4,740 |
) |
|
|
26,865 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
108,544 |
|
|
|
(16,282 |
) |
|
|
92,262 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
Retransmission compensation |
|
|
1,121,081 |
|
|
|
40.5 |
|
|
|
995,790 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
995,790 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
|
|
394,038 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
394,038 |
|
|
|
33.2 |
|
Digital |
|
|
261,159 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
230,792 |
|
|
|
(4,040 |
) |
|
|
226,752 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
101,759 |
|
|
|
(3,385 |
) |
|
|
98,374 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
Other |
|
|
26,485 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
17,861 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
17,861 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
6,148 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6,148 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Trade and barter revenue |
|
|
16,842 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
56,681 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
56,681 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
45,692 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
45,692 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
Total revenue |
|
|
2,766,696 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
2,602,933 |
|
|
|
(170,967 |
) |
|
|
2,431,966 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
1,188,373 |
|
|
|
(85,183 |
) |
|
|
1,103,190 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Less: Agency Commissions |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(170,967 |
) |
|
|
170,967 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85,183 |
) |
|
|
85,183 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenue |
|
$ |
2,766,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,431,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,431,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,103,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,103,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
On January 1, 2018, we adopted Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, the new revenue accounting guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. The adoption resulted in certain changes in our revenue recognition policies and the presentation of certain revenue sources. Beginning in the first quarter of 2018, we no longer recognize barter revenue (and related barter expense) resulting from the exchange of advertising time for certain program material. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized barter revenue (and related barter expense) of $42.5 million and $34.7 million, respectively, included in the trade and barter revenue line in the table above. Additionally, we now present local, national, political and digital revenues, exclusive of the related agency commission. As shown in the reclassifications column in the table above, the change in the presentation of local, national, political and digital revenues in years 2017 and 2016 are for comparative purposes and did not impact our past or future net revenue, income from operations or net income.
42
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth a summary of the Company’s operations for the years ended December 31 (in thousands), and each component of operating expense as a percentage of net revenue:
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
||||||
Net revenue |
|
$ |
2,766,696 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,431,966 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,103,190 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate expenses |
|
|
110,921 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
138,394 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
51,177 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Direct operating expenses, net of trade |
|
|
1,101,423 |
|
|
|
39.8 |
|
|
|
978,930 |
|
|
|
40.3 |
|
|
|
371,242 |
|
|
|
33.7 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding corporate |
|
|
469,012 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
466,712 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
212,429 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
Trade and barter expense |
|
|
16,494 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
56,970 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
45,439 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
109,789 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
100,658 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
51,300 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
149,406 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
159,500 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
46,572 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Amortization of broadcast rights, excluding barter |
|
|
61,342 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
62,908 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
22,461 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Goodwill and intangible assets impairment |
|
|
19,911 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
19,985 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
15,262 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Gain on disposal of stations, net |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(57,716 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Reimbursement from the FCC related to station repack |
|
|
(29,381 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
2,008,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,926,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
815,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
$ |
757,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
505,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
287,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2017
The period-to-period comparability of our consolidated operating results is affected by acquisitions. For each quarter we present, our legacy stations include those stations that we owned or provided services to for the complete quarter in the current and prior years. For our annual and year to date presentations, we combine the legacy stations’ amounts presented in each quarter.
Revenue
Local advertising revenue was $797.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to $805.4 million for the same period in 2017, a decrease of $7.7 million, or 1.0%. National advertising revenue was $292.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to $302.7 million for the same period in 2017, a decrease of $10.4 million, or 3.5%. Our legacy stations’ local and national advertising revenue decreased by $41.5 million, which reflected the changes in the mix between our local, national and political advertising revenue during an election year. Our station divestitures in 2017 also resulted in a decrease in revenue of $0.7 million. These decreases were partially offset by $21.7 million incremental revenue during the first quarter of 2018, resulting from our merger with Media General in January 2017, and $2.5 million incremental revenue from station acquisitions in the third and fourth quarters of 2018. Our largest advertiser category, automobile, represented approximately 24% and 25% of our local and national advertising revenue for each of the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Overall, including past results of our newly acquired stations, automobile revenues decreased by approximately 10% during the year. The other categories representing our top five were attorneys and medical/healthcare, which increased in 2018, and furniture and fast food/restaurants, which decreased in 2018.
Political advertising revenue was $251.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to $26.9 million for the same period in 2017, an increase of $224.3 million, as 2018 was an election year.
43
Retransmission compensation was $1.121 billion for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to $995.8 million for the same period in 2017, an increase of $125.3 million, or 12.6%. Our legacy stations’ revenue increased by $82.9 million primarily due to scheduled annual escalation of rates per subscriber, renewals of smaller contracts providing for higher rates per subscriber (contracts generally have a three-year term) and initial contributions from distribution agreements with OTTDs. Additionally, our merger with Media General in January 2017 resulted in incremental revenue of $38.5 million and our station acquisitions in the third and fourth quarters of 2018 resulted in incremental revenue of $4.7 million, partially offset by $0.8 million decrease resulting from station divestitures in 2017. Broadcasters currently deliver more than 30% of all television viewing audiences in a pay television household but are paid approximately 12-14% of the total cable programming fees. We anticipate continued increase of retransmission fees until there is a more balanced relationship between viewers delivered and fees paid for delivery of such viewers.
Digital media revenue, representing advertising revenue on our stations’ web and mobile sites and revenue from our other digital operations, was $261.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to $226.8 million for the same period in 2017, an increase of $34.4 million or 15.2%. This was primarily attributable to $51.8 million incremental revenue from our newly acquired stations and entities, an increase in revenue from our social media platform of $6.5 million and an increase in revenue of our legacy stations of $2.3 million. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in revenue as a result of rebranding and consolidation of our digital products and offerings of $26.1 million.
Operating Expenses (Income)
Corporate expenses, related to costs associated with the centralized management of our stations, were $110.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to $138.4 million for the same period in 2017, a decrease of $27.5 million, or 19.9%. This was primarily attributable to a decrease in payroll, severance, bonuses and payroll related expenses of $26.9 million and a decrease in legal and professional fees of $8.2 million, both of which were primarily associated with our 2017 acquisitions. These decreases were partially offset by a $7.2 million increase in stock-based compensation related to equity incentives awarded during 2018 and 2017.
Station direct operating expenses, consisting primarily of news, engineering, programming and selling, general and administrative expenses (net of trade expense) were $1.570 billion for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to $1.446 billion for the same period in 2017, an increase of $124.8 million, or 8.6%. The increase was primarily due to expenses of our newly acquired stations and entities of $88.5 million (including network and programming costs of $24.4 million), partially offset by a decrease of $1.2 million related to our station divestitures in 2017. Additionally, our legacy stations’ programming costs increased by $61.3 million primarily due to network affiliation renewals and annual increases in our network affiliation costs. Network affiliation costs have been increasing industry-wide and will continue to increase over the next several years. These increases were partially offset by a $25.2 million decrease in the direct operating expenses of our digital media entities as a result of rebranding and consolidation of our digital products and offerings.
Depreciation of property and equipment was $109.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to $100.7 million for the same period in 2017, an increase of $9.1 million, or 9.1%. This was primarily due to increased depreciation of various assets that were disposed and being replaced in connection with the station repack of $6.4 million, and incremental depreciation from newly capitalized assets.
Amortization of intangible assets was $149.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to $159.5 million for the same period in 2017, a decrease of $10.1 million, or 6.3%. This was primarily attributable to decreases in amortization from certain fully amortized assets, partially offset by incremental amortization from our acquisitions in 2018.
Amortization of broadcast rights, excluding barter were flat at $61.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to $62.9 million for the same period in 2017.
In 2017, certain of our stations were assigned to new channels (“repack”) in connection with the FCC’s process of repurposing a portion of the broadcast television spectrum for wireless broadband use. Our stations are currently spending costs, mainly capital expenditures, to construct and license the necessary technical modifications to operate on their newly assigned channels and to vacate their former channels no later than July 13, 2020. Subject to fund limitations, the FCC reimburses television broadcasters, MVPDs and other parties for costs reasonably incurred due to the repack. In 2018, we received a total of $29.4 million in reimbursements from the FCC which we recognized as operating income.
In the fourth quarter of 2018 and 2017, we recorded goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges of $19.9 million and $20.0 million, respectively, on some of our digital businesses. These were attributable to industry-wide margin compression, greater levels of competition and shortfalls from operating forecasts.
44
In connection with our merger with Media General in 2017, we sold the assets of 12 full power television stations in 12 markets, five of which were previously owned by us and seven of which were previously owned by Media General. We sold the Media General stations for a total consideration of $427.6 million and we sold our stations for $114.4 million. These divestitures resulted in a net gain on disposal of $57.7 million in 2017.
Interest Expense, net
Interest expense, net was $221.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to $241.2 million for the same period in 2017, a decrease of $20.2 million, or 8.4%, primarily attributable to one time fees associated with the financing of our acquisitions in 2017 and the redemption of our $525.0 million 6.875% Notes in February 2017, partially offset by the effects of an increasing trend in the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”).
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt
Loss on extinguishment of debt was $12.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to $34.9 million for the same period in 2017, a decrease of $22.8 million, or 65.3%. In 2018, we refinanced certain of our term loans and revolving loans, resulting in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $3.7 million. We also made prepayments of our outstanding term loans during 2018, resulting in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $8.4 million. In 2017, we redeemed the entire $525.0 million principal balance under our 6.875% Notes at a redemption price equal to 103.438%. We also refinanced $670.8 million of the Company’s term loans and revolving loans and prepaid $260.0 million principal balance under our term loans. These transactions resulted in total loss on extinguishments of debt of $34.9 million, representing premiums paid to retire the 6.875% Notes and the write-off of unamortized debt financing costs and debt discounts/premiums associated with these debt instruments.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense was $144.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to an income tax benefit of $233.9 million for the same period in 2017, an increase in income tax expense of $378.6 million. The effective tax rates during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were 27.1% and -96.9%, respectively. This significant change relates to the prior year remeasurement under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.
In 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 was signed into law which reduced the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. The reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate resulted in a $322.2 million reduction of the Company’s net deferred tax liability, or a 133.1% increase in the effective tax rate between the two periods. Other changes to the effective tax rates relate to various permanent differences such as the tax impact of limitation on compensation deduction, the tax impact related to goodwill impairment and the tax impact of excess tax benefits related stock-based compensation recognized in the income statement pursuant to ASU No. 2016-09 (adopted as of January 1, 2017). These transactions and events resulted in a total income tax expense effect of $5.68 million, or an increase to the effective tax rate of 1.1%.
Year Ended December 31, 2017 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2016
The period-to-period comparability of our consolidated operating results is affected by acquisitions. For each quarter we present, our legacy stations include those stations that we owned or provided services to for the complete quarter in the current and prior years. For our annual and year to date presentations, we combine the legacy stations’ amounts presented in each quarter.
Revenue
Local advertising revenue was $805.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $344.4 million for the same period in 2016, an increase of $461.0 million, or 133.9%. National advertising revenue was $302.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to $122.3 million for the same period in 2016, an increase of $180.4 million, or 147.5%. The increase in local and national advertising revenue was primarily attributable to incremental revenue from the stations we acquired through our merger with Media General in January 2017 along with other acquisitions of $671.5 million, less decreases in revenue resulting from station divestitures of $17.2 million. Our legacy stations’ local and national advertising revenue decreased by $13.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016, which includes the impact of revenue from the 2016 Olympics on our NBC affiliate legacy stations. Our largest advertiser category, automobile, represented approximately 25% and 26% of our local and national advertising revenue for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Overall, including past results of our newly acquired stations, automobile revenues decreased by approximately 4% during the year. The other categories representing our top five were fast food/restaurants, furniture and medical/healthcare, which declined this year, and attorneys, which increased in 2017.
45
Political advertising revenue was $26.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $92.3 million for the same period in 2016, a decrease of $65.4 million, as 2017 was not an election year.
Retransmission compensation was $995.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $394.0 million for the same period in 2016, an increase of $601.8 million, or 152.7%. The increase in retransmission compensation was attributable to incremental revenue from the stations we acquired through our merger with Media General in January 2017 along with other acquisitions of $550.9 million, less decrease in revenue resulting from station divestitures of $14.1 million. Our legacy stations’ revenue also increased by $64.9 million, primarily due to the renewals of contracts providing for higher rates per subscriber (contracts generally have a three-year term) and scheduled annual escalation of rates per subscriber. In 2016, we successfully renewed our legacy stations’ retransmission compensation agreements representing approximately 50% of our legacy stations’ subscriber base. There were no significant renewals of retransmission compensation agreements in 2017. Broadcasters currently deliver more than 30% of all television viewing audiences in a pay television household but are paid approximately 12-14% of the total cable programming fees. We anticipate continued increase of retransmission fees until there is a more balanced relationship between viewers delivered and fees paid for delivery of such viewers.
Digital media revenue, representing advertising revenue on our stations’ web and mobile sites and revenue from our other digital operations, was $226.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $98.4 million for the same period in 2016, an increase of $128.4 million or 130.5%. This was primarily attributable to the incremental revenue from the stations and digital businesses we acquired through our merger with Media General in January 2017 along with other acquisitions of $148.2 million and an increase in the revenue of our legacy stations of $4.4 million. These were partially offset by a decrease in revenue as a result of rebranding and consolidation of our digital products and offerings of $22.9 million and a decrease in revenue resulting from station divestitures of $1.3 million.
Operating Expenses (Income)
Corporate expenses, related to costs associated with the centralized management of our stations, were $138.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $51.2 million for the same period in 2016, an increase of $87.2 million, or 170.3%. This was primarily attributable to an increase in payroll, severance, bonuses and payroll related expenses of $50.5 million and an increase in legal and professional fees of $13.9 million, both of which were primarily associated with our acquisitions and increased number of stations and entities. Additionally, new equity incentive awards during the current year increased our stock-based compensation by $12.7 million.
Station direct operating expenses, consisting primarily of news, engineering, programming and selling, general and administrative expenses (net of trade expense) were $1.446 billion for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $583.7 million for the same period in 2016, an increase of $862.0 million, or 147.7%. The increase was primarily due to expenses of the stations and digital businesses we acquired through our merger with Media General in January 2017 along with other acquisitions of $862.2 million, and an increase in programming costs for our legacy stations of $38.4 million primarily related to recently enacted network affiliation agreements. Network affiliation costs have been increasing industry-wide and will continue to increase over the next several years. These increases were partially offset by a $21.2 million decrease in the direct operating expenses of our digital media entities as a result of rebranding and consolidation of our digital products and offerings and a $16.0 million decrease in our direct operating expenses attributable to stations divested.
Depreciation of property and equipment was $100.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $51.3 million for the same period in 2016, an increase of $49.4 million, or 96.2%. The increase was primarily due to the acquisition of assets through our merger with Media General.
Amortization of intangible assets was $159.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $46.6 million for the same period in 2016, an increase of $112.9 million, or 242.5%. The increase was primarily due to the acquisition of intangible assets through our merger with Media General.
Amortization of broadcast rights, excluding barter was $62.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $22.5 million for the same period in 2016, an increase of $40.4 million, or 180.1%, primarily attributable to our acquisition of broadcast rights through our merger with Media General.
In the fourth quarter of 2017, we recorded goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges of $20.0 attributable to our digital businesses as a result of reorganization, greater levels of competition and shortfalls from operating forecasts.
In connection with our merger with Media General, we sold the assets of 12 full power television stations in 12 markets, five of which were previously owned by us and seven of which were previously owned by Media General. We sold the Media General stations for a total consideration of $427.6 million and we sold our stations for $114.4 million. These divestitures resulted in a net gain on disposal of $57.7 million.
46
Interest Expense, net
Interest expense, net was $241.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $116.1 million for the same period in 2016, an increase of $125.1 million, or 107.8%, primarily attributable to interest on new borrowings and one-time fees associated with the financing of our acquisitions, less decreases in interest resulting from redemptions.
Income Taxes
Income tax benefit was $233.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to an income tax expense of $77.6 million for the same period in 2016. The effective tax rates were -96.9% and 45.5% for each of the respective periods.
In 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 was signed into law which reduces the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. The reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate resulted in a reduction of the Company’s net deferred tax liability and a corresponding recognition of income tax benefit of $322.2 million, or a decrease to the effective tax rate of 133.1%. Other changes to the effective tax rates relate to various permanent differences such as the tax impact of our previously owned stations divested in 2017, the tax impact of limitation on compensation deduction, the tax impact related to domestic production activities deduction and the tax impact of excess tax benefits related stock-based compensation which are now recognized in the income statement pursuant to ASU No. 2016-09 (adopted as of January 1, 2017). These transactions and events resulted in a total income tax benefit effect of $19.6 million, or a decrease to the effective tax rate of 9.5%.
47
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company is leveraged, which makes it vulnerable to changes in general economic conditions. The Company’s ability to meet the future cash requirements described below depends on its ability to generate cash in the future, which is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other conditions, many of which are beyond the Company’s control. Based on current operations and anticipated future growth, the Company believes that its available cash, anticipated cash flow from operations and available borrowings under the senior secured credit facilities will be sufficient to fund working capital, capital expenditure requirements, interest payments and scheduled debt principal payments for at least the next twelve months as of the filing date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In order to meet future cash needs the Company may, from time to time, borrow under its existing senior secured credit facilities or issue other long- or short-term debt or equity, if the market and the terms of its existing debt arrangements permit. We will continue to evaluate the best use of our operating cash flow among our capital expenditures, acquisitions and debt reduction.
Overview
The following tables present summarized financial information management believes is helpful in evaluating the Company’s liquidity and capital resources (in thousands):
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||
Net cash provided by operating activities(1) |
|
$ |
736,867 |
|
|
$ |
109,091 |
|
|
$ |
284,253 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities(1)(2) |
|
|
(175,514 |
) |
|
|
(2,066,285 |
) |
|
|
(135,122 |
) |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(1) |
|
|
(531,890 |
) |
|
|
1,057,367 |
|
|
|
822,932 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(1) |
|
$ |
29,463 |
|
|
$ |
(899,827 |
) |
|
$ |
972,063 |
|
Cash paid for interest(1) |
|
$ |
218,746 |
|
|
$ |
239,558 |
|
|
$ |
78,261 |
|
Income taxes paid, net of refunds(3) |
|
$ |
90,717 |
|
|
$ |
272,689 |
|
|
$ |
29,391 |
|
(1) |
As discussed in Note 2 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV, Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company, effective on January 1, 2018, adopted the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, which provides guidance related to classification on the statement of cash flows of certain cash receipts and cash payments, and the FASB ASU 2016-18, which provides guidance related to classification on the statement of cash flows of restricted cash. These adoptions changed the cash flow reporting of certain transactions of the Company between 2017 and 2016. Accordingly, our current presentation of the 2017 net cash provided by operating activities, net cash used in investing activities and net cash provided by financing activities decreased by $27.6 million, $4.2 million and $900.0 million, respectively, compared to amounts previously presented. Also, our current presentation of the 2016 net cash provided by operating activities and net cash provided by financing activities increased by $22.7 million and $900.00 million, respectively, and our 2016 net cash used in investing activities decreased by $5.1 million. |
(2) |
In 2018, the investing activities included total capital expenditures of $106.2 million, of which $26.8 million was reimbursed from the FCC in connection with the station repack and $2.9 million was funded by the incentive auction proceeds received from the FCC in 2017. |
(3) |
The cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds, during the year ended December 31, 2018 includes payments totaling $1.1 million in tax liabilities assumed in the acquisition of LKQD and was funded by the seller through working capital. The cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds, during the year ended December 31, 2017 includes payments totaling $237.9 million, primarily related to the proceeds received to relinquish certain spectrum and tax liabilities resulting from various sale of stations. No payments for tax liabilities resulting from non-recurring events were made during 2016. |
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
145,115 |
|
|
$ |
115,652 |
|
Long-term debt including current portion |
|
|
3,981,003 |
|
|
|
4,362,460 |
|
Unused revolving loan commitments under senior secured credit facilities(1) |
|
|
166,372 |
|
|
|
172,000 |
|
(1) |
Based on the covenant calculations as of December 31, 2018, all of the $166.4 million total unused revolving loan commitments under the Company’s senior secured credit facilities were available for borrowing. |
48
Cash Flows – Operating Activities
Net cash flows provided by operating activities increased by $627.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the same period in 2017. This was primarily attributable to an increase in net revenue (excluding trade and barter) of $374.6 million less an increase in station and corporate operating expenses (excluding non-cash transactions) of $89.2 million, a decrease in payments for tax liabilities of $182.0 million, primarily due to nonrecurring tax payments in 2017 resulting from the sale of stations and tax payments related to the proceeds from spectrum auction, a decrease in cash paid for interest of $20.8 million, a decrease in the use of cash resulting from timing of payments to vendors of $32.8 million, source of cash resulting from timing of accounts receivable collections of $87.5 million, and a decrease in payments for contingent consideration related to a past acquisition of $4.0 million.
Cash paid for interest decreased by $20.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the same period in 2017, primarily due to one-time fees incurred in 2017 associated with the financing of our acquisitions.
Net cash flows provided by operating activities decreased by $175.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. This was primarily attributable to an increase in payments for tax liabilities of $243.3 million, primarily related to proceeds from the spectrum auction and station divestitures, an increase in cash paid for interest of $161.3 million, use of cash resulting from timing of payments to vendors of $64.1 million, use of cash resulting from timing of accounts receivable collections of $29.4 million and an increase in payments for broadcast rights of $39.5 million. These transactions were partially offset by an increase in net revenue (excluding trade and barter) of $1.318 billion less an increase in station and corporate operating expenses (excluding non-cash transactions) of $940.6 million.
Cash paid for interest increased by $161.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016, primarily due to interest on borrowings during 2017 (net of redemptions) and one-time fees associated with the financing of our 2017 acquisitions.
Cash Flows – Investing Activities
Net cash flows used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $175.5 million, compared to $2.066 billion and $135.1 million for the same period in 2017 and 2016, respectively.
In 2018, we completed our acquisition of LKQD for a cash purchase price of $97.0 million, less $11.2 million of cash acquired, and the acquisitions of two new stations for $18.0 million. We also spent $106.2 million in capital expenditures. These transactions were partially offset by reimbursements from the FCC related to station repack of $29.4 million and proceeds from disposal of assets of $4.3 million.
In 2017, we completed our merger with Media General and paid $1.376 billion in cash consideration to stockholders of Media General, less $63.9 million of cash acquired through the merger. In connection with the merger, we also repaid $1.658 billion of Media General’s certain then existing indebtedness as part of the acquisition purchase price. In 2017, we also completed our acquisition of certain assets of a station for $4.1 million in cash. We also spent $72.5 million in capital expenditures. These transactions were partially offset by $481.9 million net proceeds from station divestitures and $478.6 million gross proceeds to relinquish the spectrum of certain Company stations that accepted bids in the 2017 incentive auction. We also received $20.0 million in proceeds from disposal of assets, primarily the sale of a real estate property.
In 2016, we acquired certain assets of four full power stations in four markets in West Virginia and paid $58.5 million. Additionally, we completed the acquisition of five full power stations for total payments of $45.5 million. In 2016, we spent $31.9 million in capital expenditures.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, capital expenditures increased by $33.8 million compared to the same period in 2017, primarily due to increased spending of $26.8 million related to station repack and $2.9 million related to the relinquishment of certain spectrum. The capital expenditures related to station repack were reimbursed from the FCC and the capital expenditures related to relinquishment of certain spectrum were funded by the incentive auction proceeds received from the FCC in 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2017, capital expenditures increased by $40.6 million compared to the same period in 2016, primarily due to capital expenditures for newly acquired stations.
49
Cash Flows – Financing Activities
Net cash flows used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $531.9 million, compared to net cash provided by financing activities during the same period in 2017 and 2016 of $1.057 billion and $822.9 million, respectively.
In 2018, we borrowed $44.0 million under our revolving credit facility to partially fund our acquisition of LKQD and received $6.0 million in proceeds from stock option exercises. Marshall also issued a $51.8 million term loan to refinance the outstanding principal balances under its previous term loan and revolving credit facility of $48.8 million and $3.0 million, respectively. Additionally, Marshall borrowed a $5.6 million revolving loan to partially repay its Term Loan A. In October 2018, the Company amended its credit agreements which decreased the interest rates and extended the maturity date on certain of its debt. In connection with this refinancing, Nexstar borrowed an additional $150.0 million under its Term Loan A, the proceeds of which were used to partially repay the outstanding principal balance under Nexstar’s Term Loan B. These transactions were partially offset by repayments of outstanding obligations under our revolving credit facility of $44.0 million, repayments of outstanding principal balance under the Company’s term loans of $401.6 million, purchases of treasury stock of $50.5 million, payments of dividends to our common stockholders of $68.6 million ($0.375 per share each quarter), payments for capital lease and capitalized software obligations of $8.8 million, cash payment for taxes in exchange for shares of common stock withheld of $4.9 million, payments to acquire the remaining assets of a station previously owned by KRBK, LLC of $2.5 million and payments for debt financing costs associated with the Company’s debt refinancing of $1.1 million.
In 2017, the Company borrowed term loans, net of debt discount, of $3.531 billion and drew $3.0 million under a revolving loan. We also received $8.2 million in proceeds from stock option exercises. These cash flow increases were partially offset by repayments of certain then existing term and revolving loans of Nexstar, Mission and Marshall with an aggregate principal of $670.8 million, our redemption of the entire $525.0 million principal amount of our 6.875% Notes at a redemption price equal to 103.438%, repayments of outstanding principal balance under our term loans of $454.4 million associated with the amendments to senior secured credit facilities in July 2017, prepayments of $260.0 million outstanding principal balances under our term loans, scheduled repayments of outstanding principal balance under our, Mission’s, Marshall’s and Shield’s term loans of $12.2 million, payments for debt financing costs associated with new term loans and new revolving credit facilities of $52.0 million, payments to acquire the remaining assets of stations previously owned by West Virginia Media Holdings of $66.9 million, repurchases of our Class A Common Stock of $99.0 million, payments of dividends to our common stockholders of $55.9 million ($0.30 per share each quarter), payments for contingent consideration, mainly related to our merger with Media General, of $259.6 million, payments for capital lease and capitalized software obligations of $7.1 million and cash payment for taxes in exchange for shares of Nexstar common stock withheld of $4.1 million.
In 2016, we issued our $900.0 million 5.625% Notes at par. The proceeds of this loan were directly deposited in a restricted escrow account which was eventually released to us in January 2017 to partially fund our merger with Media General and related transactions. During 2016, we also borrowed a total of $58.0 million under our revolving credit facility to fund our acquisitions. We also received $1.2 million proceeds from stock option exercises. These cash flow increases were partially offset by repayments of outstanding obligations under our revolving credit facility of $58.0 million, scheduled repayments of outstanding principal balance under our, Mission’s and Marshall’s term loans of $22.1 million, payments for debt financing costs of $20.7 million, payments of dividends to our common stockholders of $29.4 million ($0.24 per share each quarter), payments for contingent consideration related to a past acquisition of $2.0 million, payments for capital lease and capitalized software obligations of $3.3 million and distribution to a noncontrolling interest of $0.6 million.
50
Future Sources of Financing and Debt Service Requirements
As of December 31, 2018, the Company had total combined debt of $4.0 billion, which represented 68.2% of the Company’s combined capitalization. The Company’s high level of debt requires that a substantial portion of cash flow be dedicated to pay principal and interest on debt, which reduces the funds available for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes.
The following table summarizes the approximate aggregate amount of principal indebtedness scheduled to mature for the periods referenced as of December 31, 2018 (in thousands):
|
|
Total |
|
|
2019 |
|
|
2020-2021 |
|
|
2022-2023 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|||||
Nexstar senior secured credit facility |
|
$ |
2,148,128 |
|
|
$ |
41,477 |
|
|
$ |
99,546 |
|
|
$ |
688,525 |
|
|
$ |
1,318,580 |
|
Mission senior secured credit facility |
|
|
228,527 |
|
|
|
2,285 |
|
|
|
4,570 |
|
|
|
4,570 |
|
|
|
217,102 |
|
Marshall senior secured credit facility |
|
|
51,183 |
|
|
|
51,183 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Shield senior secured credit facility |
|
|
22,959 |
|
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
2,755 |
|
|
|
19,056 |
|
|
|
- |
|
5.875% senior unsecured notes due 2022 |
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
6.125% senior unsecured notes due 2022 |
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
5.625% senior unsecured notes due 2024 |
|
|
900,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
900,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
4,025,797 |
|
|
$ |
96,093 |
|
|
$ |
106,871 |
|
|
$ |
1,387,151 |
|
|
$ |
2,435,682 |
|
We make semiannual interest payments on our $275.0 million 6.125% Notes on February 15 and August 15 of each year. We make semiannual interest payments on the 5.625% Notes on February 1 and August 1 of each year. We also make semiannual payments on the 5.875% Notes on May 15 and November 15 of each year. Interest payments on our, Mission’s, Marshall’s and Shield’s senior secured credit facilities are generally paid every one to three months and are payable based on the type of interest rate selected.
The terms of our, Mission’s, Marshall’s and Shield’s senior secured credit facilities, as well as the indentures governing our 6.125% Notes, 5.625% Notes and the 5.875% Notes, limit, but do not prohibit us, Mission, Marshall or Shield, from incurring substantial amounts of additional debt in the future.
The Company does not have any rating downgrade triggers that would accelerate the maturity dates of its debt. However, a downgrade in the Company’s credit rating could adversely affect its ability to renew the existing credit facilities, obtain access to new credit facilities or otherwise issue debt in the future and could increase the cost of such debt.
The Company had $166.4 million of total unused revolving loan commitments under the senior secured credit facilities, all of which were available for borrowing, based on the covenant calculations as of December 31, 2018. The Company’s ability to access funds under its senior secured credit facilities depends, in part, on our compliance with certain financial covenants. Any additional drawings under the senior secured credit facilities will reduce the Company’s future borrowing capacity and the amount of total unused revolving loan commitments.
During 2018, we repurchased a total of 751,920 shares of our Class A common stock for $50.5 million, funded by cash on hand. On April, 26, 2018, our Board of Directors approved an increase in our share repurchase authorization to repurchase up to an additional $200.0 million of our Class A common stock. As of December 31, 2018, the remaining available amount under the share repurchase authorization was $201.9 million, inclusive of the 2018 additional authorization and the remaining balance under our prior authorization.
On November 30, 2018, we entered into a definitive merger agreement with Tribune to acquire Tribune’s outstanding equity for $46.50 per share in a cash transaction that is valued at $6.4 billion, consisting of the merger cash consideration and the refinancing of Tribune's outstanding debt. The merger is not subject to any financing condition and we received committed financing up to a maximum of $6.4 billion from a group of commercial banks to provide the debt financing to consummate the merger and the refinancing of certain of the existing indebtedness of Tribune and related transactions. The merger has been approved by the boards of directors of both companies and is projected to close late in the third quarter of 2019, subject to FCC approval, other regulatory approvals and satisfaction of other customary closing conditions. We and Tribune plan to divest certain of our stations in connection with the proposed merger in order to comply with FCC media ownership rules.
51
The merger agreement contains certain termination rights for both us and Tribune. If the merger agreement is terminated in connection with Tribune entering into a definitive agreement with respect to a superior proposal, as well as under certain other circumstances, the termination fee payable by Tribune to us will be $135 million. If the merger agreement is terminated because the required Tribune stockholder vote is not obtained at a stockholder meeting duly held for such purpose, Tribune will be required to reimburse us for our costs and expenses incurred in connection with the transaction in an amount not to exceed $15 million. Either party may terminate the merger agreement if the merger is not consummated on or before an end date of November 30, 2019, with an automatic extension to February 29, 2020, if necessary to obtain regulatory approval under circumstances specified in the merger agreement.
On January 25, 2019, Nexstar’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share of its Class A common stock. The dividend was paid on February 22, 2019 to stockholders of record on February 8, 2019.
On January 28, 2019, Nexstar completed the acquisition of KHII and paid the remaining purchase price of $6.4 million, funded by cash on hand.
Debt Covenants
Our credit agreement contains a covenant which requires us to comply with a maximum consolidated first lien net leverage ratio of 4.25 to 1.00. The financial covenant, which is formally calculated on a quarterly basis, is based on our combined results. The Mission, Marshall and Shield amended credit agreements do not contain financial covenant ratio requirements but do provide for default in the event we do not comply with all covenants contained in our credit agreement. As of December 31, 2018, we were in compliance with our financial covenant. We believe Nexstar, Mission, Marshall and Shield will be able to maintain compliance with all covenants contained in the credit agreements governing the senior secured facilities and the indentures governing our 6.125% Notes, our 5.625% Notes and our 5.875% Notes for a period of at least the next 12 months from December 31, 2018.
No Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2018, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or variable interest entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. All of our arrangements with our VIEs in which we are the primary beneficiary are on-balance sheet arrangements. Our variable interests in other entities are obtained through local service agreements, which have valid business purposes and transfer certain station activities from the station owners to us. We are, therefore, not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.
52
Contractual Obligations
The following summarizes the Company’s contractual obligations as of December 31, 2018, and the effect such obligations are expected to have on the Company’s liquidity and cash flow in future periods (in thousands):
|
|
Total |
|
|
2019 |
|
|
2020-2021 |
|
|
2022-2023 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|||||
Recorded contractual obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nexstar senior secured credit facility |
|
$ |
2,148,128 |
|
|
$ |
41,477 |
|
|
$ |
99,546 |
|
|
$ |
688,525 |
|
|
$ |
1,318,580 |
|
Mission senior secured credit facility |
|
|
228,527 |
|
|
|
2,285 |
|
|
|
4,570 |
|
|
|
4,570 |
|
|
|
217,102 |
|
Marshall senior secured credit facility |
|
|
51,183 |
|
|
|
51,183 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Shield senior secured credit facility |
|
|
22,959 |
|
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
2,755 |
|
|
|
19,056 |
|
|
|
- |
|
5.875% senior unsecured notes due 2022 |
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
6.125% senior unsecured notes due 2022 |
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
5.625% senior unsecured notes due 2024 |
|
|
900,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
900,000 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
24,227 |
|
|
|
1,766 |
|
|
|
3,638 |
|
|
|
3,621 |
|
|
|
15,202 |
|
Broadcast rights current cash commitments(1) |
|
|
25,447 |
|
|
|
8,373 |
|
|
|
12,051 |
|
|
|
5,023 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other(2)(3)(4) |
|
|
34,340 |
|
|
|
8,198 |
|
|
|
20,513 |
|
|
|
5,629 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Unrecorded contractual obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Network affiliation agreements |
|
|
1,326,594 |
|
|
|
542,790 |
|
|
|
598,880 |
|
|
|
184,924 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Cash interest on debt(5) |
|
|
940,137 |
|
|
|
199,615 |
|
|
|
389,499 |
|
|
|
318,182 |
|
|
|
32,841 |
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
|
121,072 |
|
|
|
22,179 |
|
|
|
36,635 |
|
|
|
24,681 |
|
|
|
37,577 |
|
Executive employee contracts(6) |
|
|
57,131 |
|
|
|
29,545 |
|
|
|
25,024 |
|
|
|
2,562 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Broadcast rights future cash commitments(7) |
|
|
114,757 |
|
|
|
46,118 |
|
|
|
55,821 |
|
|
|
12,818 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other |
|
|
29,958 |
|
|
|
11,513 |
|
|
|
18,445 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
$ |
6,699,460 |
|
|
$ |
966,190 |
|
|
$ |
1,267,377 |
|
|
$ |
1,944,591 |
|
|
$ |
2,521,302 |
|
(1) |
Future minimum payments for license agreements for which the license period has begun. |
(2) |
Excludes our liabilities, as of December 31, 2018, to surrender spectrum pursuant to the FCC’s incentive auction of $130.0 million. These liabilities represent our obligations to move two of our stations from UHF channels to VHF channels. Upon completion, the liabilities and the related spectrum assets will be derecognized with no expected cash flow impact. |
(3) |
As of December 31, 2018, we had $12.5 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits. This liability represents an estimate of tax positions that the Company has taken in its tax returns, which may ultimately not be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. The resolution of these tax positions may not require cash settlement due to the existence of federal and state NOLs. As such, our contractual obligations table above excludes this liability. |
(4) |
As of December 31, 2018, we had $92.8 million and $21.4 million of funding obligations with respect to our pension benefit plans and other postretirement benefit plans, respectively, which are not included in the table above. See Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding our funding obligations for these benefit plans. |
(5) |
Estimated interest payments due as if all debt outstanding as of December 31, 2018 remained outstanding until maturity, based on interest rates in effect at December 31, 2018. |
(6) |
Includes the employment contracts for all corporate executive employees and general managers of our stations and entities. We expect our contracts will be renewed or replaced with similar agreements upon their expiration. Amounts included in the table above assumed that contracts are not terminated prior to their expiration. |
(7) |
Future minimum payments for license agreements for which the license period has not commenced and no liability has been recorded. |
53
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to business acquisitions, goodwill and intangible assets, property and equipment, broadcast rights, retransmission compensation, trade, pension and postretirement benefits and income taxes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
For an overview of our significant accounting policies, we refer you to Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV, Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We believe the following critical accounting policies are those that are the most important to the presentation of our Consolidated Financial Statements, affect our more significant estimates and assumptions, and require the most subjective or complex judgments by management.
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
We regularly evaluate our local service agreements and other arrangements where we may have variable interests to determine whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE. Under U.S. GAAP, a company must consolidate an entity when it has a “controlling financial interest” resulting from ownership of a majority of the entity’s voting rights. Accounting rules expanded the definition of controlling financial interest to include factors other than equity ownership and voting rights.
In applying accounting and disclosure requirements, we must base our decision to consolidate an entity on quantitative and qualitative factors that indicate whether or not we have the power to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly affect its economic performance and whether or not we have the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Our evaluation of the “power” and “economics” model must be an ongoing process and may alter as facts and circumstances change.
Mission, Marshall, Shield and other consolidated VIEs are included in our Consolidated Financial Statements because we are deemed to have controlling financial interests in these entities as VIEs for financial reporting purposes as a result of (1) local service agreements we have with the stations they own, (2) our guarantee of the obligations incurred under Mission’s, Marshall’s and Shield’s senior secured credit facilities, (3) our power over significant activities affecting these entities’ economic performance, including budgeting for advertising revenue, advertising sales and, in some cases, hiring and firing of sales force personnel and (4) purchase options granted by each VIE, exclusive of Marshall, which permit Nexstar to acquire the assets and assume the liabilities of each of the VIEs’ stations at any time, subject to FCC consent. These purchase options are freely exercisable or assignable by Nexstar without consent or approval by the VIEs. These option agreements expire on various dates between 2021 and 2028. We expect to renew these option agreements upon expiration. Therefore, these VIEs are consolidated into these financial statements.
Valuation of Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Intangible assets represented $5.4 billion, or 77.0%, of our total assets as of December 31, 2018. Intangible assets consist primarily of goodwill, FCC licenses, network affiliation agreements, developed technology and customer relationships arising from acquisitions. The purchase prices of acquired businesses are allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired at estimated fair values at the date of acquisition using various valuation techniques, including discounted projected cash flows, the cost approach and the income approach. The fair value estimates are based on, but not limited to, expected future revenue and cash flows, expected future growth rates, and estimated discount rates. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. If the fair value of these assets is less than the carrying value, we are required to record an impairment charge.
We aggregate our television station markets into a single broadcast business reporting unit for purposes of our goodwill impairment tests because of their similar economic characteristics. We perform our FCC license impairment tests on a market basis. The Company’s digital businesses increased from
We test our goodwill and FCC licenses in our fourth quarter each year, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that such assets might be impaired. We first assess the qualitative factors to determine the likelihood of our goodwill and FCC licenses being impaired. Our qualitative analysis includes, but is not limited to, assessing the changes in macroeconomic conditions, regulatory environment, industry and market conditions, and the financial performance versus budget of the reporting units, as well as any other events or circumstances specific to the reporting unit or the FCC licenses. If it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit or an FCC license is greater than their respective carrying amounts, no further testing will be required. Otherwise, we will apply the quantitative impairment test method.
54
The quantitative impairment test for goodwill is performed by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is not impaired and no further testing is required. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The quantitative impairment test for FCC licenses consists of a market-by-market comparison of the carrying amounts of FCC licenses with their fair value, using a discounted cash flow analysis. An impairment is recorded when the carrying value of an FCC license exceeds its fair value.
We test our finite-lived intangible assets whenever events or circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable, relying on a number of factors including operating results, business plans, economic projections and anticipated future cash flows. Impairment in the carrying amount of a finite-lived intangible asset is recognized when the expected future operating cash flow derived from the operations to which the asset relates is less than its carrying value.
We performed our annual impairment tests on goodwill and FCC licenses attributable to our broadcast business using the qualitative analysis approach and concluded that it was more likely than not that their fair values would sufficiently exceed the carrying amounts. There were no indicators that our finite-lived intangible assets attributable to broadcast markets will not be recoverable.
We performed the quantitative goodwill impairment tests on two of our digital reporting units as a result of shortfalls from operating forecasts and increased levels of competition. The quantitative impairment tests resulted in total impairment charges of $19.9 million. For the remaining two digital reporting units, the Company performed its annual impairment tests using the qualitative analysis approach and concluded that it was more likely than not that their fair values would sufficiently exceed the carrying amounts. As of December 31, 2018, three of the Company’s digital reporting units had no remaining goodwill balance and one digital reporting unit acquired in January 2018 had a goodwill balance of $42.1 million.
The quantitative analyses for our digital businesses was performed using a combination of a discounted cash flows analysis and market revenue multiples analysis, including the following key assumptions: (i) compound annual growth rate ranging from 4.4% to 5.0% based on management projections and industry trends, (ii) operating profit margins in the initial year ranging from 1.1% to 5.9% driven by planned development activities, increasing to 6.3% to 13.7% reflecting a mature operating model, (iii) discount rate of 15.0% based on an analysis of digital media companies, (iv) income tax rate of 21.0% to 28.7% based on statutory federal and blended state tax rates, (v) terminal growth rate of 2.5% based on a mature company in the digital media industry and (vi) market revenue multiples, adjusted for our reporting units’ forecasted operating performance, ranging from 0.3 to 0.5.
Our quantitative goodwill impairment tests are sensitive to changes in key assumptions used in our analysis, such as expected future cash flows and market trends. If the assumptions used in our analysis are not realized, it is possible that an additional impairment charge may need to be recorded in the future. We cannot accurately predict the amount and timing of any impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets. Further, we will need to continue to evaluate the carrying value of our goodwill and any additional impairment charges that we may take in the future could have an impact on our results of operations and financial condition. We will actively monitor the results of these reporting units in future quarters.
We also performed quantitative and qualitative tests to determine whether these digital reporting units’ finite-lived assets are recoverable. Based on our estimate of undiscounted future pre-tax cash flows expected to result from the use of these assets, we determined that the carrying amounts are recoverable as of December 31, 2018. No other events or circumstances were noted in 2018 that would indicate impairment.
Broadcast Rights Carrying Amount
We record cash broadcast rights contracts as an asset and a liability when the license period has begun, the cost of each program is known or reasonably determinable, we have accepted the program material, and the program is produced and available for broadcast. Cash broadcast rights are initially recorded at the contract cost and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the period the programming airs. The current portion of cash broadcast rights represents those rights available for broadcast which will be amortized in the succeeding year. Periodically, we evaluate the net realizable value, calculated using the average historical rates for the programs or the time periods the programming will air, of our cash broadcast rights and adjust amortization in that quarter for any deficiency calculated. As of December 31, 2018, the carrying amounts of our current cash broadcast rights were $7.7 million and our non-current cash broadcast rights were $16.5 million.
55
As discussed in Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV, Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we adopted the FASB issued new revenue standard (ASU No. 2014-09) effective on January 1, 2018. As a result of the adoption, we no longer recognize barter revenue, barter expense, barter broadcast rights and barter broadcast liabilities resulting from the exchange of advertising time for certain program material. As of December 31, 2017, the current barter broadcast rights (and the related current barter broadcast liabilities) were $9.7 million and the noncurrent barter broadcast rights (and the related noncurrent barter broadcast liabilities) were $12.5 million. On January 1, 2018, an adjustment was recorded to remove the offsetting balances of these accounts.
Pension plans and postretirement benefits
A determination of the liabilities and cost of the Company’s pension and other postretirement plans requires the use of assumptions. The actuarial assumptions used in the Company’s pension and postretirement reporting are reviewed annually with independent actuaries and are compared with external benchmarks, historical trends and the Company’s own experience to determine that its assumptions are reasonable. The assumptions used in developing the required estimates include the following key factors:
|
• |
discount rates |
|
• |
expected return on plan assets |
|
• |
mortality rates |
|
• |
retirement rates |
|
• |
expected contributions |
The expected rate of return on plan assets is 7.00%. The effective discount rate used for determining pension benefit obligations and pension net periodic benefit credit at year end was 4.12% and 3.49%, respectively. As of and for the year ended December 31, 2018, our pension benefit obligations and net periodic benefit cost (credit) was $423.7 million and ($11.6) million, respectively. As of December 31, 2018, a 1% change in the discount rates would have the following effects (in thousands):
|
|
1% Increase |
|
|
1% Decrease |
|
||
Projected impact on net periodic benefit credit |
|
$ |
2,394 |
|
|
$ |
(3,189 |
) |
Projected impact on pension benefit obligations |
|
|
(38,918 |
) |
|
|
46,409 |
|
Retransmission Revenue
We earn revenues from local cable providers, DBS services and other MVPDs and OTTDs for the retransmission of our broadcasts. These revenues are generally earned based on a price per subscriber of the distributor within the retransmission area. The distributors report their subscriber numbers to us generally on a 30- to 60-day lag, generally upon payment of the fees due to us. Prior to receiving the reports, we record revenue based on management’s estimate of the number of subscribers, utilizing historical levels and trends of subscribers for each distributor. The impact of the lag in the number of subscribers is not significant.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and tax basis of assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is applied against net deferred tax assets if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. While we have considered future taxable income in assessing the need for a valuation allowance, in the event that we were to determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of our deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the valuation allowance would be charged to income in the period such a determination was made. Section 382 of the Code generally imposes an annual limitation on the amount of NOLs that may be used to offset taxable income when a corporation has undergone significant changes in stock ownership. Ownership changes are evaluated as they occur and could limit the ability to use NOLs. The Company does not expect any NOLs to expire as a result of Section 382 limitations.
The ability to use NOLs is also dependent upon the Company’s ability to generate taxable income. The NOLs could expire prior to their use. To the extent the Company’s use of NOLs is significantly limited, the Company’s income could be subject to corporate income tax earlier than it would if it were not able to use NOLs, which could have a negative effect on the Company’s financial results and operations. Changes in ownership are largely beyond our control and we can give no assurance that we will continue to have realizable NOLs.
56
We recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities. The determination is based on the technical merits of the position and presumes that each uncertain tax position will be examined by the relevant taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. We recognize interest and penalties relating to income taxes as components of income tax expense.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Refer to Note 2 of our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV, Item 15(a) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of recently issued accounting pronouncements, including our expected date of adoption and effects on results of operations and financial position.
Item 7A. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Interest Rate Risk
Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our long-term debt obligations.
The term loan borrowings under the Company’s senior credit facilities bear interest at rates ranging from 4.27% to 4.77% as of December 31, 2018, which represented the base rate, or LIBOR, plus the applicable margin, as defined. The revolving loans bear interest at LIBOR plus the applicable margin, which totaled 4.27% at December 31, 2018. Interest is payable in accordance with the credit agreements.
If LIBOR were to increase by 100 basis points, or one percentage point, from the December 31, 2018 level, the Company’s annual interest expense would increase and cash flow from operations would decrease by $24.5 million, based on the outstanding balance of its credit facilities as of December 31, 2018. An increase in LIBOR of 50 basis points (one-half of a percentage point) would result in a $12.2 million increase in the Company’s annual interest expense and decrease in cash flows from operations. If LIBOR were to decrease either by 100 basis points or 50 basis points, the Company’s annual interest would decrease and cash flows from operations would increase by $24.5 million and $12.2 million, respectively. Our 5.625% Notes, 6.125% Notes and 5.875% Notes are fixed rate debt obligations and therefore are not exposed to market interest rate changes. As of December 31, 2018, we have no financial instruments in place to hedge against changes in the benchmark interest rates on our senior credit facilities.
Impact of Inflation
We believe that our results of operations are not affected by moderate changes in the inflation rate.
Item 8. |
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
Our Consolidated Financial Statements are filed with this report. The Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data are included in Part IV, Item 15(a) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 9. |
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
None.
Item 9A. |
Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Nexstar’s management, with the participation of its President and Chief Executive Officer along with its Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report of the effectiveness of the design and operation of Nexstar’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act.
Based upon that evaluation, Nexstar’s President and Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of December 31, 2018, Nexstar’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to Nexstar’s management, including its President and Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the quarterly period as of the end of the period covered by this report, there have been no changes in Nexstar’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.
57
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Nexstar’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Management assesses the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018 based upon the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013).
As of December 31, 2018, we have excluded from our assessment of internal control over financial reporting the accounts of LKQD, KRBK, and WHDF, because they were acquired in business combinations during 2018, and KHII, because it was a VIE first consolidated during 2018. The total assets and total revenues of these entities that are excluded from our assessment of internal control over financial reporting collectively represent approximately 0.5% and 1.5%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018. LKQD was the most significant, representing 0.4% of consolidated total assets and 1.2% of consolidated total revenues as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Based on management’s assessment, we have concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2018.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018 as stated in their report which appears herein.
Item 9B. |
Other Information |
None.
58
PART III
Item 10. |
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance |
Information concerning directors that is required by this Item 10 will be set forth in the Proxy Statement to be provided to stockholders in connection with our 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”) or in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the headings “Directors” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11. |
Executive Compensation |
Information required by this Item 11 will be set forth in the Proxy Statement under the headings “Compensation of Named Executive Officers” and “Compensation of Directors,” which information is incorporated herein by reference. Information specified in Items 402(k) and 402(l) of Regulation S-K and set forth in the Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference.
Item 12. |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management, and Related Stockholder Matters |
Information required by this Item 12 will be set forth in the Proxy Statement under the headings “Beneficial Ownership of Nexstar Common Stock,” and “Compensation of Named Executive Officers,” which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence |
Information required by this Item 13 will be set forth in the Proxy Statement under the heading “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions,” which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. |
Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
Information required by this Item 14 will be set forth in the Proxy Statement under the heading “Ratification of the Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,” which information is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
Item 15. |
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules |
(a) Documents filed as part of this report:
|
(1) |
Consolidated Financial Statements. The Consolidated Financial Statements of Nexstar Media Group, Inc. listed on the index on page F-1 have been included beginning on page F-3 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
|
The audited Financial Statements of Mission Broadcasting, Inc. as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, as filed in Mission Broadcasting, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, are incorporated by reference in this report. |
|
(2) |
Financial Statement Schedules. The schedule of Valuation and Qualifying Accounts appears in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements filed as part of this report. |
|
(3) |
Exhibits. The exhibits listed on the accompanying Index to Exhibits on this Annual Report on Form 10-K are filed, furnished or incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference, as applicable. |
Item 16. |
Form 10-K Summary |
Not applicable.
59
Exhibit Index
Exhibit Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
4.10 |
|
|
4.11 |
|
|
4.12 |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
10.2 |
|
60
10.3 |
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
10.10 |
|
|
10.11 |
|
|
10.12 |
|
|
10.13 |
|
|
10.14 |
|
|
10.15 |
|
|
10.16 |
|
|
10.17 |
|
61
10.18 |
|
|
10.19 |
|
|
10.20 |
|
|
10.21 |
|
|
10.22 |
|
|
10.23 |
|
|
10.24 |
|
|
10.25 |
|
|
10.26 |
|
|
10.27 |
|
|
10.28 |
|
|
10.29 |
|
|
10.30 |
|
|
10.31 |
|
|
10.32 |
|
|
10.33 |
|
|
10.34 |
|
|
10.35 |
|
|
10.36 |
|
|
10.37 |
|
|
10.38 |
|
62
10.39 |
|
|
10.40 |
|
|
10.41 |
|
|
10.42 |
|
|
10.43 |
|
|
10.44 |
|
|
10.45 |
|
|
10.46 |
|
|
10.47 |
|
|
10.48 |
|
|
10.49 |
|
|
10.50 |
|
|
10.51 |
|
|
10.52 |
|
|
10.53 |
|
|
10.54 |
|
|
10.55 |
|
|
10.56 |
|
|
10.57 |
|
|
10.58 |
|
63
10.59 |
|
|
10.60 |
|
|
10.61 |
|
|
10.62 |
|
|
10.63 |
|
|
10.64 |
|
|
10.65 |
|
|
10.66 |
|
|
10.67 |
|
|
10.68 |
|
|
10.69 |
|
|
10.70 |
|
|
10.71 |
|
|
10.72 |
|
|
10.73 |
|
|
10.74 |
|
|
10.75 |
|
|
10.76 |
|
|
10.77 |
|
|
10.78 |
|
64
10.79 |
|
|
10.80 |
|
|
10.81 |
|
|
10.82 |
|
|
10.83 |
|
|
10.84 |
|
|
10.85 |
|
|
10.86 |
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Perry A. Sook pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
31.2 |
|
Certification of Thomas E. Carter pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
32.1 |
|
Certification of Perry A. Sook pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350.* |
32.2 |
|
Certification of Thomas E. Carter pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350.* |
101 |
|
The Company's Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes for the year ended December 31, 2018 from this Annual Report on Form 10-K, formatted in iXBRL (Inline eXtensible Business Reporting Language).* |
+ |
Schedules have been omitted from this filing pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. A copy of any omitted schedule will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. |
* |
Filed herewith. |
65
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
NEXSTAR MEDIA GROUP, INC. |
||
By: |
|
/s/ PERRY A. SOOK |
|
|
Perry A. Sook |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
By: |
|
/s/ THOMAS E. CARTER |
|
|
Thomas E. Carter |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
Dated: February 26, 2019
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on February 26, 2019.
Name |
|
|
|
Title |
/s/ PERRY A. SOOK |
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman |
Perry A. Sook |
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
/s/ THOMAS E. CARTER |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
Thomas E. Carter |
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
/s/ GEOFF ARMSTRONG |
|
|
|
Director |
Geoff Armstrong |
|
|
|
|
/s/ DENNIS J. FITZSIMONS |
|
|
|
Director |
Dennis J. FitzSimons |
|
|
|
|
/s/ JAY M. GROSSMAN |
|
|
|
Director |
Jay M. Grossman |
|
|
|
|
/s/ C. THOMAS MCMILLEN |
|
|
|
Director |
C. Thomas McMillen |
|
|
|
|
/s/ LISBETH MCNABB |
|
|
|
Director |
Lisbeth McNabb |
|
|
|
|
/s/ DENNIS A. MILLER |
|
|
|
Director |
Dennis A. Miller |
|
|
|
|
/s/ JOHN R. MUSE |
|
|
|
Director |
John R. Muse |
|
|
|
|
/s/ I. MARTIN POMPADUR |
|
|
|
Director |
I. Martin Pompadur |
|
|
|
|
66
NEXSTAR MEDIA GROUP, INC.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
F-2 |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 |
|
F-3 |
|
|
F-4 |
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 |
|
F-5 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 |
|
F-6 |
|
|
F-7 |
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Nexstar Media Group, Inc.:
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Nexstar Media Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, of changes in stockholders’ equity and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for revenues from contracts with customers and the manner in which it accounts for restricted cash in 2018.
Basis for Opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
As described in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management has excluded from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018 LKQD, KRBK, and WHDF, because they were acquired by the Company in business combinations during 2018, and KHII, because it was a VIE first consolidated by the Company during 2018. We have also excluded LKQD, KRBK, WHDR and KHII from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. The total assets and total revenues excluded from management’s assessment and our audit of internal control over financial reporting for LKQD, KRBK, WHDF (each wholly-owned subsidiaries) and KHII (a consolidated subsidiary) collectively represent approximately 0.5% and 1.5%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018. LKQD was the most significant, representing 0.4% of consolidated total assets and 1.2% of consolidated total revenues as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Dallas, Texas
February 26, 2019
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1997.
F-2
NEXSTAR MEDIA GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share information)
|
December 31, |
|
|||||
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spectrum asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FCC licenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets(1) |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of debt |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability to surrender spectrum asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock - $ of December 31, 2018 and 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common stock - $ outstanding as of December 31, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B Common stock - $ at each of December 31, 2018 and 2017 |
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Class C Common stock - $ outstanding at each of December 31, 2018 and 2017 |
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock - at cost; |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Total Nexstar Media Group, Inc. stockholders' equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated variable interest entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders' equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
(1) |
|
F-3
NEXSTAR MEDIA GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands, except per share information)
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||
Net revenue |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Operating expenses (income): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of broadcast rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement from the FCC related to station repack |
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Goodwill and intangible assets impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposal of stations, net |
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Pension and other postretirement plans credit, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Other expenses |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Net income attributable to Nexstar Media Group, Inc. |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share attributable to Nexstar Media Group, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Diluted |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrecognized amounts included in pension and other postretirement benefit obligations, net of tax benefit (expense) of $ |
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Total comprehensive income attributable to Nexstar Media Group, Inc. |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-4
NEXSTAR MEDIA GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
For the Three Years Ended December 31, 2018
(in thousands, except share information)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Accumulated |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Class A |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Deficit) |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|||||||||
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
Stockholders' |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
interests |
|
|
Equity |
|
|||||||||
Balances as of December 31, 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting of restricted stock units and exercise of stock options |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit from stock option exercises |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock dividends declared |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Consolidation of variable interest entities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of noncontrolling interests |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Distribution to a noncontrolling interest |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Net income |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of December 31, 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to adopt ASU 2016-16 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance/reissuance of stock in connection with a merger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option replacement awards in connection with a merger |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting of restricted stock units and exercise of stock options |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock dividends declared |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Purchase of noncontrolling interests from variable interest entities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Consolidation of variable interest entities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deconsolidation of a variable interest entity |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Contribution from a noncontrolling interest |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Change in pension and other postretirement benefit obligations, net of tax |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of December 31, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting of restricted stock units and exercise of stock options |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock dividends declared |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Consolidation of a variable interest entity |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution from a noncontrolling interest |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in pension and other postretirement benefit obligations, net of tax |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balances as of December 31, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-5
NEXSTAR MEDIA GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for bad debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of broadcast rights, excluding barter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss (gain) on asset disposal, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of debt financing costs and debt discounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Goodwill and intangible assets impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payments for broadcast rights |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Other noncash credits, net |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Change in the fair value of contingent consideration |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for contingent consideration in connection with an acquisition |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Spectrum repack reimbursements |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions and dispositions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Interest payable |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Deposits and payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Proceeds from sale of stations |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Spectrum repack reimbursements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Proceeds received to relinquish spectrum asset |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Proceeds from disposals of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds received from settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt, net of debt discounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Premium paid on debt extinguishment |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Payments for debt financing costs |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Contributions from a noncontrolling interest, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock dividends paid |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Purchase of noncontrolling interests |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Payments for contingent consideration in connection with acquisitions |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Cash paid for shares withheld for taxes |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Payments for capital lease and capitalized software obligations |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Supplemental information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Income taxes paid, net of refunds |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued purchases of property and equipment |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Noncash purchases of property and equipment |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Consolidation of variable interest entities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Accrued debt financing costs |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Debt assumed in connection with a merger |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Issuance/reissuance of Class A Common Stock in connection with a merger |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Stock option replacement awards in connection with a merger |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Relinquishment of spectrum asset and derecognition of liability to surrender spectrum asset |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Contingent consideration payable in connection with a merger |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-6
NEXSTAR MEDIA GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Organization and Business Operations
As of December 31, 2018, Nexstar Media Group, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (“Nexstar”) owned, operated, programmed or provided sales and other services to
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Nexstar and the accounts of independently-owned VIEs for which Nexstar is the primary beneficiary (See Note 2—Variable Interest Entities). Nexstar and the consolidated VIEs are collectively referred to as the “Company.” Noncontrolling interests represent the VIE owners’ share of the equity in the consolidated VIEs and are presented as a component separate from Nexstar Media Group, Inc. stockholders’ equity. All intercompany account balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Nexstar management evaluates each arrangement that may include variable interests and determines the need to consolidate an entity where it determines Nexstar is the primary beneficiary of a VIE in accordance with related authoritative literature and interpretive guidance. On December 17, 2018, Nexstar became the primary beneficiary of its variable interest in the station KHII (formerly KFVE) and consolidated this station as of that date. See Note 2 – Variable Interest Entities for additional information.
As of December 31, the following are assets of consolidated VIEs, excluding intercompany amounts, that are not available to settle the obligations of Nexstar and the liabilities of consolidated VIEs, excluding intercompany amounts, for which their creditors do not have recourse to the general credit of Nexstar (in thousands):
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spectrum asset |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FCC licenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability to surrender spectrum asset |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Liquidity
The Company is leveraged, which makes it vulnerable to changes in general economic conditions. The Company’s ability to repay or refinance its debt will depend on, among other things, financial, business, market, competitive and other conditions, many of which are beyond the Company’s control.
F-7
On November 30, 2018, Nexstar entered into a definitive merger agreement with Tribune Media Company (“Tribune”) to acquire the latter’s outstanding equity and to settle the outstanding equity-based awards for $
As of December 31, 2018, the Company was in compliance with its financial covenants contained in the amended credit agreements governing its senior secured credit facilities and the indentures governing the
Variable Interest Entities
The Company may determine that an entity is a VIE as a result of local service agreements entered into with an entity. The term local service agreement generally refers to a contract between two separately owned television stations serving the same market, whereby the owner-operator of one station contracts with the owner-operator of the other station to provide it with administrative, sales and other services required for the operation of its station. Nevertheless, the owner-operator of each station retains control and responsibility for the operation of its station, including ultimate responsibility over all programming broadcast on its station. A local service agreement can be (1) a time brokerage agreement (“TBA”) or a local marketing agreement (“LMA”) which allows Nexstar to program most of a station’s broadcast time, sell the station’s advertising time and retain the advertising revenue generated in exchange for monthly payments, based on the station’s monthly operating expenses, (2) a shared services agreement (“SSA”) which allows the Nexstar station in the market to provide services including news production, technical maintenance and security, in exchange for Nexstar’s right to receive certain payments as described in the SSA, or (3) a joint sales agreement (“JSA”) which permits Nexstar to sell certain of the station’s advertising time and retain a percentage of the related revenue, as described in the JSA.
Consolidated VIEs
Nexstar consolidates entities in which Nexstar is deemed under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) to have controlling financial interests for financial reporting purposes as a result of (1) local service agreements Nexstar has with the stations owned by these entities, (2) Nexstar’s guarantees of the obligations incurred under certain VIEs’ senior secured credit facilities (see Note 7), (3) Nexstar having power over significant activities affecting these VIEs’ economic performance, including budgeting for advertising revenue, certain advertising sales and, in some cases, hiring and firing of sales force personnel and (4) purchase options granted by each VIE, exclusive of Marshall Broadcasting Group, Inc. (“Marshall”), which permit Nexstar to acquire the assets and assume the liabilities of each of the VIEs’ stations, subject to Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) consent.
In connection with an agreement to acquire the MNTV affiliated television station KHII from HITV License Subsidiary, Inc. (“HITV”), Nexstar began providing programming and sales services to the station effective
F-8
The following table summarizes the various local service agreements Nexstar had in effect as of December 31, 2018 with its consolidated VIEs:
Service Agreements |
|
Owner |
|
Full Power Stations |
TBA Only |
|
Mission Broadcasting, Inc. (“Mission”) |
|
WFXP, KHMT and KFQX |
|
|
HITV |
|
KHII, KGMD, KGMV |
LMA Only |
|
WNAC, LLC |
|
WNAC |
|
|
54 Broadcasting, Inc. (“54 Broadcasting”) |
|
KNVA |
SSA & JSA |
|
Mission |
|
KJTL, KLRT, KASN, KOLR, KCIT, KAMC, KRBC, KSAN, WUTR, WAWV, WYOU, KODE, WTVO, KTVE, WTVW and WVNY |
|
|
White Knight Broadcasting (“White Knight”) |
|
WVLA, KFXK, KSHV |
|
|
Shield Media, LLC (“Shield”) |
|
WXXA and WLAJ |
|
|
Vaughan Media, LLC (“Vaughan”) |
|
WBDT, WYTV and KTKA |
|
|
Marshall |
|
KLJB, KPEJ and KMSS |
SSA Only |
|
Tamer Media, LLC (“Tamer”) |
|
KWBQ, KASY and KRWB |
Nexstar’s ability to receive cash from Mission, Marshall, White Knight, Shield, Tamer, Vaughan, WNAC, LLC, 54 Broadcasting and HITV is governed by the local service agreements. Under these agreements, Nexstar has received substantially all of the consolidated VIEs’ available cash, after satisfaction of operating costs and debt obligations. Nexstar anticipates it will continue to receive substantially all of the consolidated VIEs’ available cash, after satisfaction of operating costs and debt obligations. In compliance with FCC regulations for all the parties, Mission, Marshall, White Knight, Shield, Tamer, Vaughan, WNAC, LLC, 54 Broadcasting and HITV maintain complete responsibility for and control over programming, finances, personnel and operations of their stations.
Nexstar had a variable interest in KRBK, LLC, the owner of station KRBK, upon execution of a TBA effective August 1, 2018 and a purchase agreement to acquire the assets of the station. Nexstar evaluated its business arrangement with KRBK, LLC and determined that it was the primary beneficiary of the variable interest because it had the ultimate power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the station including developing the annual operating budget, selling advertising, and oversight and control of sales management personnel. Thus, Nexstar consolidated KRBK as of August 1, 2018 under authoritative guidance related to the consolidation of VIEs. The assets that were consolidated into Nexstar included the licensed assets and network affiliation agreement of KRBK but were attributed to the owner of the station at the time (noncontrolling interest). On October 17, 2018, Nexstar received approval from the FCC to acquire the licensed assets of the station. On November 1, 2018, Nexstar paid the former owner of the remaining purchase price, acquired the full balance of the noncontrolling interest and completed the acquisition. As of this date, KRBK is no longer a VIE. See Note 3 for additional information.
F-9
The carrying amounts and classification of the assets and liabilities, excluding intercompany amounts, of the VIEs which have been included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spectrum asset |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FCC licenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability to surrender spectrum asset |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Non-Consolidated VIEs
Nexstar has an outsourcing agreement with Cunningham Broadcasting Corporation (“Cunningham”), which continues through December 31, 2020. Under the outsourcing agreement, Nexstar provides certain engineering, production, sales and administrative services for WYZZ, the FOX affiliate in the Peoria, Illinois market, through WMBD, the Nexstar television station in that market. During the term of the outsourcing agreement, Nexstar retains the broadcasting revenue and related expenses of WYZZ and is obligated to pay a monthly fee to Cunningham based on the combined operating cash flow of WMBD and WYZZ, as defined in the agreement.
Nexstar has determined that it has a variable interest in WYZZ. Nexstar has evaluated its arrangements with Cunningham and has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of the variable interest in this station because it does not have the ultimate power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the station’s economic performance, including developing the annual operating budget, programming and oversight and control of sales management personnel. Therefore, Nexstar has not consolidated WYZZ under authoritative guidance related to the consolidation of VIEs. Under the local service agreement for WYZZ, Nexstar pays for certain operating expenses, and therefore may have unlimited exposure to any potential operating losses. Nexstar’s management believes that Nexstar’s minimum exposure to loss under the WYZZ agreement consists of the fees paid to Cunningham. Additionally, Nexstar indemnifies the owners of Cunningham from and against all liability and claims arising out of or resulting from its activities, acts or omissions in connection with the agreement. The maximum potential amount of future payments Nexstar could be required to make for such indemnification is undeterminable at this time. There were no significant transactions arising from Nexstar’s outsourcing agreement with Cunningham.
In connection with an agreement to acquire WHDF from Huntsville TV, LLC, Nexstar began providing programming and sales services to the station effective
F-10
Basis of Presentation
Certain prior year financial statement amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and use assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure for contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. The more significant estimates made by management include those relating to the allowance for doubtful accounts, valuation related to business combinations, including assets acquired, liabilities assumed, contingent consideration liability and any other assets or liabilities recognized from these transactions, retransmission revenue recognized, trade transactions, pension and postretirement obligations, income taxes, the recoverability of goodwill, FCC licenses and other long-lived assets, the recoverability of broadcast rights and the useful lives of property and equipment and intangible assets. Actual results may vary from such estimates recorded.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of ninety days or less to be cash equivalents.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The Company’s accounts receivable consist primarily of billings to its customers for advertising broadcast on its stations or placed on its websites, for retransmission consent from cable or satellite operators, for digital publishing and content management, digital video advertising, social media advertising and related services. Trade receivables normally have terms of 30 days and the Company has no interest provision for customer accounts that are past due. The Company maintains an allowance for estimated losses resulting from the inability of customers to make required payments. Management periodically evaluates the collectability of accounts receivable based on a combination of factors, including customer payment history, known customer circumstances, the overall aging of customer balances and trends. In circumstances where management is aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations, an allowance is recorded to reduce the receivable amount to an amount estimated to be collectable.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments which potentially expose the Company to a concentration of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, and accounts receivable. Cash deposits are maintained with several financial institutions. Deposits held with banks may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits; however, the Company believes these deposits are maintained with financial institutions of reputable credit and are not subject to any unusual credit risk. A significant portion of the Company’s accounts receivable is due from local and national advertising agencies. The Company does not require collateral from its customers but maintains reserves for potential credit losses. Management believes that the allowance for doubtful accounts is adequate, but if the financial condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, additional allowances may be required. The Company has not experienced significant losses related to receivables from individual customers or by geographical area.
Revenue Recognition
As discussed in Recent Accounting Pronouncements below, the Company adopted the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and all related amendments. ASC 606 establishes a comprehensive new revenue recognition model designed to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer in an amount that reflects the consideration the entity expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for those goods or services and requires significantly enhanced revenue disclosures. The Company adopted this standard effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method as applied to customer contracts that were not completed as of January 1, 2018. As a result, financial information for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 is presented under ASC 606, while comparative financial information has not been adjusted and continues to be reported in accordance with the Company’s historical accounting policy for revenue recognition prior to the adoption of ASC 606.
F-11
The Company’s revenue is primarily derived from the sale of advertising and the compensation received from traditional multichannel video programming distributors (“MVPDs”), such as cable and satellite providers, as well as over-the-top video distributors (“OTTDs”), companies that provide video content through internet streaming, in return for the Company’s consent to the retransmission of the signals of its television stations. Total revenue includes advertising revenue, retransmission compensation, digital revenue and other broadcast related revenues. The Company’s contracts with customers may include multiple performance obligations. For such arrangements, the Company allocates revenue to each performance obligation based on its relative standalone selling price, which is generally determined based on the price charged to customers. The Company also determines whether gross or net presentation is appropriate based on its relationship in the applicable transaction with its ultimate customer. Any amounts paid by customers but not earned as of the balance sheet date are recorded as a contract liability (deferred revenue). The lag between billing the customers and when the payment is due is not significant.
The stations’ advertising contracts are short-term in nature and include a number of spots that are delivered over the term of the arrangement. For broadcast of commercials (local, national and political advertising), the performance obligation is identified at the contract level as it represents a station’s promise to deliver an agreed number of spots, an agreed price per spot and other specifications. Each performance obligation is satisfied over time as the advertiser receives and consumes benefits when a station airs the advertiser’s commercial. For digital advertising, the performance obligation is a station’s promise to place an advertisement in its website and is satisfied either based on impressions or the placement of ads over an agreed period of time. Advertising revenue is recognized, for the amount the Company is entitled to receive, when the advertisements are broadcast on its stations or delivered on the stations’ websites.
The Company’s retransmission consent agreements with MVPDs and OTTDs generally have a three-year term and provide revenue based on a monthly amount the Company is entitled to receive per subscriber. Under ASC 606, these revenues are considered arising from the licensing of functional intellectual property. As such, the Company applies the exception for sales- or usage-based royalty for the accounting of variable consideration and recognizes revenue (retransmission compensation) at the point in time the broadcast signal is delivered to the distributors. The distributors report their subscriber numbers to the Company on a 30- to 60-day lag, which coincides with their payment of the fees due to the Company. Prior to receiving the report, the Company records revenue based on estimated number of subscribers and the monthly amount the Company is entitled to receive per subscriber. The impact of the lag in the number of subscribers is not significant.
Revenue from the Company’s other digital businesses includes revenue from digital publishing and content management platforms, a digital video advertising platform, a social media advertising platform and related services. Revenue is recognized at the time advertising is delivered or upon performance of services. The Company applies the right to invoice practical expedient to certain transactions where the invoice amount corresponds directly with the value to its customers. Most of the arrangements with customers are short-term in nature.
The Company trades certain advertising time for various goods and services. These transactions are short-term in nature and are recorded at the estimated fair value of the goods or services received. Revenue from trade transactions is recognized when the related advertisement spots are broadcast. The Company recorded $
The above revenue recognition policies are consistent with the Company’s historical accounting policies prior to the adoption of ASC 606.
Effective on January 1, 2018, the Company no longer recognizes barter revenue (and the related barter expense) resulting from the exchange of advertising time for certain program material. During the year ended December 31, 2017, barter revenue (and the related barter expense) were $
Under the Company’s historical accounting policy prior to the adoption of ASC 606, barter revenue (and the related barter expense) would have been $
F-12
The Company elected to utilize the practical expedient around costs incurred to obtain contracts for television advertising and digital advertising due to their short-term nature. Additionally, the incremental benefit from efforts in acquiring these contracts is considered not significant. Thus, the Company continued to expense sales commissions when incurred.
The Company did not disclose the value of unsatisfied performance obligations on its contracts with customers because they are either (i) contracts with an original expected term of one year or less, (ii) contracts for which the sales- or usage-based royalty exception was applied, or (iii) contracts for which revenue is recognized in proportion to the amount the Company has the right to invoice for services performed.
The Company’s contract liabilities, which are reflected in its Consolidated Financial Statements as accrued expenses and other liabilities, consist primarily of customer payments for products or services received before the transfer of control to the customer occurs (deferred revenue). The Company’s performance obligations related to contract liabilities of $
See Note 14 for disaggregated revenue information.
Broadcast Rights and Broadcast Rights Payable
The Company records broadcast rights contracts as an asset and a liability when the following criteria are met: (1) the license period has begun, (2) the cost of each program is known or reasonably determinable, (3) the program material has been accepted in accordance with the license agreement, and (4) the program is produced and available for broadcast. Cash broadcast rights are initially recorded at the contract cost and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the period the programming airs. The current portion of cash broadcast rights represents those rights available for broadcast which will be amortized in the succeeding year. The Company periodically evaluates the net realizable value, calculated using the average historical rates for the programs or the time periods the programming will air, of cash broadcast rights and adjusts the amortization for any deficiency calculated.
Effective on January 1, 2018, the Company no longer recognizes barter broadcast rights and barter broadcast rights payable resulting from the exchange of advertising time for certain program material. See Revenue Recognition policy above for additional information.
Property and Equipment, Net
Property and equipment is stated at cost or estimated fair value at the date of acquisition through a business combination. The cost and related accumulated depreciation applicable to assets sold or retired are removed from the accounts and the gain or loss on disposition is recognized. Major renewals and betterments are capitalized, and ordinary repairs and maintenance are charged to expense in the period incurred. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets (see Note 4).
Intangible Assets, Net
Intangible assets consist primarily of goodwill, FCC licenses, network affiliation agreements, developed technology and customer relationships arising from acquisitions. The Company accounts for acquired businesses using the acquisition method of accounting, which requires that purchase prices, including any contingent consideration, are measured at acquisition date fair values. These purchase prices are allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at estimated fair values at the date of acquisition using various valuation techniques, including discounted projected cash flows, the cost approach and the income approach. The fair value estimates are based on, but not limited to, expected future revenue and cash flows, expected future growth rates, and estimated discount rates. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. During the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, the Company records adjustments related to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments are recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
F-13
The Company’s goodwill and FCC licenses are considered to be indefinite-lived intangible assets and are not amortized but are tested for impairment annually in the Company’s fourth quarter, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that such assets might be impaired. The use of an indefinite life for FCC licenses contemplates the Company’s historical ability to renew its licenses such that renewals generally may be obtained indefinitely and at little cost. Therefore, cash flows derived from the FCC licenses are expected to continue indefinitely. Network affiliation agreements are subject to amortization computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of
The Company aggregates its television stations into a single broadcast business reporting unit for purposes of goodwill impairment tests because of their similar economic characteristics. The Company’s impairment review for FCC licenses is performed at the television station market level. In January 2018, the Company’s digital businesses increased from
The Company first assesses the qualitative factors to determine the likelihood of the goodwill and FCC licenses being impaired. The qualitative analysis includes, but is not limited to, assessing the changes in macroeconomic conditions, regulatory environment, industry and market conditions, and the financial performance versus budget of the reporting units, as well as any other events or circumstances specific to the reporting units or the FCC licenses. If it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill or a station’s FCC license is greater than its carrying amount, no further testing will be required. Otherwise, the Company will apply the quantitative impairment test method.
The quantitative impairment test for goodwill is performed by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is not impaired and no further testing is required. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The quantitative impairment test for FCC licenses consists of a market-by-market comparison of the carrying amounts of FCC licenses with their fair value, using a discounted cash flow analysis. An impairment is recorded when the carrying value of an FCC license exceeds its fair value.
Determining the fair value of reporting units and FCC licenses requires management to make a number of judgments about assumptions and estimates that are highly subjective and that are based on unobservable inputs. The actual results may differ from these assumptions and estimates, and it is possible that such differences could have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. In addition to the various inputs (i.e. market growth, operating profit margins, discount rates) used to calculate the fair value of reporting units and FCC licenses, the Company evaluates the reasonableness of its assumptions by comparing the total fair value of all its reporting units to its total market capitalization; and by comparing the fair values of its reporting units and FCC licenses to recent market television station sale transactions.
The Company tests finite-lived intangible assets and other long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable, relying on a number of factors including operating results, business plans, economic projections and anticipated future cash flows. The impairment test for finite-lived intangible assets consists of an asset (asset group) comparison of the carrying amount with its estimated undiscounted future cash flows. An impairment in the carrying amount of a finite-lived intangible asset is recognized when the expected discounted future operating cash flow derived from the operation to which the asset relates is less than its carrying value.
Debt Financing Costs
Debt financing costs represent direct costs incurred to obtain long-term financing and are amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt using the effective interest method. Previously capitalized debt financing costs are expensed and included in loss on extinguishment of debt if the Company determines that there has been a substantial modification of the related debt. Deferred financing costs related to term loans and senior unsecured notes are combined with debt discounts and presented as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of debt. Debt financing costs related to revolving credit facilities are included in other noncurrent assets.
Comprehensive Income
The Company’s comprehensive income consists of net income and unrecognized actuarial gains and losses on its pension and postretirement liabilities, net of income tax adjustments.
F-14
Advertising Expense
The cost of advertising is expensed as incurred. The Company incurred advertising costs in the amount of $
Financial Instruments
The Company utilizes the following categories to classify the valuation methodologies for fair values of financial assets and liabilities:
Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability;
Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity).
The carrying amount of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, accounts receivable, broadcast rights, accounts payable, and accrued expenses and other current liabilities approximates fair value due to their short-term nature.
See Note 3 for fair value disclosures of spectrum asset and contingent consideration liability (CVR) in connection with Nexstar’s merger with Media General, Inc. (“Media General”).
See Note 7 for fair value disclosures related to the Company’s debt.
Certain investments held in the pension and other post retirement plans have been valued using net asset value (“NAV”) as a practical expedient for fair value. In accordance with ASC 820, investments measured at NAV are excluded from the fair value hierarchy. See Note 8 for fair value disclosures related to retirement and postretirement plans.
Pension plans and postretirement benefits
A determination of the liabilities and cost of the Company’s pension and other postretirement plans requires the use of assumptions. The actuarial assumptions used in the Company’s pension and postretirement reporting are reviewed annually with independent actuaries and are compared with external benchmarks, historical trends and the Company’s own experience to determine that its assumptions are reasonable. The assumptions used in developing the required estimates include the following key factors: discount rates, expected return on plan assets, mortality rates, retirement rates and expected contributions. The amount by which the projected benefit obligation exceeds the fair value of the pension plan assets is recorded in other noncurrent liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet.
As discussed under Recent Accounting Pronouncements, as of January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU No. 2017-07. Under ASU No. 2017-07, entities are required to (1) disaggregate the current-service-cost component from the other components of net benefit cost (the “other components”) and present such current-service-costs in the same income statement line item as other compensation costs for services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period and (2) present the other components in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside the subtotal of income from operations. The Company had
Company-owned Life Insurance
The Company owns life insurance policies on certain executives, current employees, former employees and retirees. These policies were assumed from a past acquisition. Management considers these policies to be operating assets. Cash surrender values of life insurance policies are presented net of policy loans. Borrowings and repayments against company-owned life insurance are reflected in the operating activities section of the statement of cash flows. Under ASU No. 2016-15, payments received for the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance claims are now required to be disclosed within investing activities. Accordingly, amounts previously reported in fiscal year 2017 as a source of cash from operating activities have been reclassified to investing activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
F-15
Stock-Based Compensation
Nexstar maintains stock-based employee and non-employee compensation plans which are described more fully in Note 10. The Company calculates the grant-date fair value of employee and non-employee stock options using the Black-Scholes model. The fair values of time-based and performance-based restricted stock units are based on the number of shares awarded and market price of the stock on the date of award. These amounts are recognized into selling, general and administrative expense over the vesting period of the options or the time-based restricted stock units, and for performance-based restricted stock units, when it is probable that the performance conditions will be achieved. The excess or shortage of tax deductions over the compensation cost of stock-based payments is recognized as income tax benefit or income tax expense, respectively.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and tax basis of assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is applied against net deferred tax assets if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Nexstar and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return. Mission, Marshall, White Knight and 54 Broadcasting file their own separate federal income tax returns. Shield, Vaughan, Tamer and WNAC are disregarded entities for tax purposes and do not incur tax within the consolidated financial statements.
The Company recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities. The determination is based on the technical merits of the position and presumes that each uncertain tax position will be examined by the relevant taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. The Company recognizes interest and penalties relating to income taxes within income tax expense.
Income Per Share
Basic income per share is computed by dividing the net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted income per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares and potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive common shares are calculated using the treasury stock method. They consist of stock options and restricted stock units outstanding during the period and reflect the potential dilution that could occur if common shares were issued upon exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units. The following table shows the amounts used in computing the Company’s diluted shares during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive effect of equity incentive plan instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has outstanding stock options and restricted stock units to acquire
Segments
Nexstar operates in
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
New Accounting Standards Adopted
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The Company adopted this standard and all related amendments effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method as applied to customer contracts that were not completed as of January 1, 2018. Upon adoption of this standard, the cumulative adjustment to the Company’s retained earnings as of January 1, 2018 for the cumulative effect of initially applying the new standard is not material. See Revenue Recognition above for the Company’s updated accounting policy and for expanded disclosures.
F-16
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force) (“ASU 2016-15”). The amendments in ASU 2016-15 address eight specific cash flow issues and apply to all entities that are required to present a statement of cash flows under FASB Accounting Standards Codification 230, Statement of Cash Flows. The amendments in ASU 2016-15 are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company has applied the change in accounting as of January 1, 2018 on a retrospective basis. This adoption impacted Nexstar’s previous financing activity classification of payments for contingent consideration in 2017 related to an acquisition. The payment was not made soon after the consummation of a business combination and includes an amount that is more than the acquisition date fair value of the contingent consideration liability. Under ASU 2016-15, this portion of the transaction should be classified as an operating activity in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. The adoption also impacted Nexstar’s disclosure of payments received for the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance claims within the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows during the year ended December 31, 2017. The payments were previously reported as a source of cash from operating activities and are now required to be disclosed within investing activities, as indicated in the third table below. ASU No 2016-15 did not impact the Company’s cash flow presentations during the year ended December 31, 2016.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash, a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (“ASU 2016-18”), which provides guidance on the presentation of restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 is effective for public business entities in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company has applied the change in accounting as of January 1, 2018 on a retrospective basis. This adoption impacted the following transactions and balances during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:
2016 Transactions |
|
2016 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Previous Presentation) |
In July 2016, Nexstar issued its $
|
|
|
In 2016, Nexstar pre-funded the interest on the
|
|
$
|
In 2016, Nexstar earned $
|
|
The income was previously presented as an adjustment against net income and reduced net cash provided by operating activities |
As of December 31, 2016, the restricted escrow account had a balance of $ |
|
Not previously included in the cash balance at the end of period. |
2017 Transactions |
|
2017 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Previous Presentation) |
In January 2017, the funds previously deposited in a restricted escrow account totaling $
|
|
(i) $ (ii) $ (iii) $ (iv) $
|
On February 1, 2017, Nexstar paid the first semi-annual interest due to the lenders of the |
|
No cash flow reported in 2017 for the payment of interest on the 5.625% Notes as the cash flow impact was reported in 2016 when the pre-funding was made |
Under ASU 2016-18, transfers between cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents are not part of an entity’s operating, investing and financing activities, and details of those transfers are not reported as cash flow activities in the statement of cash flows. As such, the previous classifications in the 2017 and 2016 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows related to these transactions were reversed. Additionally, the cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash as of December 31, 2016 increased. Also, the supplemental cash flow information for interest paid increased in 2017 and decreased in 2016. The supplemental information for non-cash investing and financing activities in 2016 related to the issuance of 5.625% Notes directly deposited into an escrow account decreased.
F-17
The following tables summarize the line items in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows that were impacted by the adoption of ASU 2016-15 and ASU 2016-18 along with reclassifications to conform with current year presentation (in thousands):
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
Previously |
|
|
Adjustments for adoption of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|||||||
|
|
Reported |
|
|
ASU 2016-15 |
|
|
ASU 2016-18 |
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
Presentation |
|
|||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for contingent consideration in connection with an acquisition |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
Other non-cash credits |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Accounts receivable |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Withdrawal of interest previously deposited in escrow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Proceeds received from corporate-owned life insurance policies |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for contingent consideration in connection with an acquisition |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2016 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
Previously |
|
|
Adjustments for adoption of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|||||||
|
|
Reported |
|
|
ASU 2016-15 |
|
|
ASU 2016-18 |
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
Presentation |
|
|||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from escrow deposit |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid interest deposited in escrow |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the issuance of debt directly deposited into escrow |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business (“ASU 2017-01”). ASU 2017-01 provides clarification on the definition of a business and adds guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. To be considered a business under the new guidance, it must include an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create output. The amendment removes the evaluation of whether a market participant could replace missing elements. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and will be applied prospectively. The Company has applied the change in accounting as of January 1, 2018. The adoption of this ASU did not impact the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-18
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation—Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (“ASU 2017-07”). ASU 2017-07 requires entities to (1) disaggregate the current-service-cost component from the other components and present it with other current compensation costs for related employees in the income statement and (2) present the other components elsewhere in the income statement and outside of income from operations if that subtotal is presented. In addition, ASU 2017-07 requires entities to disclose the income statement lines that contain the other components if they are not presented on appropriately described separate lines. The amendment should be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and prospectively for the capitalization of the service cost component. ASU 2017-07 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company has applied the change in accounting as of January 1, 2018. Accordingly, net periodic benefit income, excluding service costs, of $
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718) – Scope of Modification Accounting (“ASU 2017-09”). ASU 2017-09 clarifies when changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award must be accounted for as modifications. The new guidance will reduce diversity in practice and result in fewer changes to the terms of an award being accounted for as modifications. Under ASU 2017-09, an entity will not apply modification accounting to a share-based payment award if the award’s fair value, vesting conditions and classification as an equity or liability instrument are the same immediately before and after the change. ASU 2017-09 will be applied prospectively to awards modified on or after the adoption date. ASU 2017-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company has applied the change in accounting as of January 1, 2018. The adoption of this ASU did not impact the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, Reporting Comprehensive Income: Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“ASU 2018-02”). ASU 2018-02 provides the option to reclassify stranded tax effects related to the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“Tax Act”) in accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings. The adjustment relates to the change in the U.S. corporate income tax rate. The adoption of this ASU did not impact the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2018-07”). The standard aligns the accounting for share-based payment awards issued to employees and nonemployees. Changes to the accounting for nonemployee awards include: (1) equity-classified share-based payment awards issued to nonemployees will now be measured on the grant date, instead of the previous requirement to remeasure the awards through the performance completion date; (2) for performance conditions, compensation cost associated with the award will be recognized when achievement of the performance condition is probable, rather than upon achievement of the performance condition; and (3) the current requirement to reassess the classification (equity or liability) for nonemployee awards upon vesting will be eliminated, except for awards in the form of convertible instruments. The guidance should be applied to all new awards granted after the date of adoption. In addition, the modified retrospective approach should be used on all liability-classified awards that have not been settled and equity-classified awards for which a measurement date has not been established by the adoption date by remeasurement at fair value as of the adoption date with a cumulative effect adjustment to opening retained earnings in the fiscal year of adoption. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, but no earlier than an entity’s adoption of ASC 606. The Company has applied the change in accounting as of January 1, 2018. The adoption of this ASU did not impact the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer's Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract (“ASU 2018-15”). ASU 2018-15 aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. The amendments in this Update are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and early adoption is permitted. The Company has applied the change in accounting as of January 1, 2018. The adoption of this ASU did not have a significant impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
In August 2018, the SEC adopted the final rule under SEC Release No. 33-10532, Disclosure Update and Simplification, amending certain disclosure requirements that were redundant, duplicative, overlapping, outdated or superseded. In addition, the amendments expanded the disclosure requirements on the analysis of stockholders' equity for interim financial statements. Under the amendments, an analysis of changes in each caption of stockholders' equity presented in the balance sheet must be provided in a note or separate statement. The analysis should present a reconciliation of the beginning balance to the ending balance of each period for which a statement of comprehensive income is required to be filed. This final rule was effective on November 5, 2018. The Company has applied the new SEC disclosure requirements in its Consolidated Financial Statements on a retrospective basis.
F-19
New Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”). Under this guidance, lessees are required to recognize on the balance sheet a right-of-use asset and a lease liability arising from operating leases except for short-term contracts with original terms of twelve months or less. The new guidance also requires enhanced qualitative and quantitative disclosures in the notes to the financial statements and is expected to provide transparency of information and comparability among organizations. ASU 2016-02 and related amendments is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company will adopt ASU 2016–02 as of January 1, 2019 using the optional transition method. As such, the Company's reporting for the comparative periods presented in the financial statements will continue to be in accordance with ASC Topic 840, Leases. The Company will apply certain practical expedients offered in the new lease guidance, such as no reassessment of whether expired or existing contracts contain leases, no re-evaluation of the classification of expired or existing leases and no reassessment of initial direct costs for existing leases. Upon adoption, the Company expects to record an increase in total assets and total liabilities by less than
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326) (“ASU 2016-13”). The standard requires entities to estimate loss of financial assets measured at amortized cost, including trade receivables, debt securities and loans, using an expected credit loss model. The expected credit loss model differs from the previous incurred losses model primarily in that the loss recognition threshold of “probable” has been eliminated and that expected loss should consider reasonable and supportable forecasts in addition to the previously considered past events and current conditions. Additionally, the guidance requires additional disclosures related to the further disaggregation of information related to the credit quality of financial assets by year of the asset’s origination for as many as five years. In November 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-19 to clarify the scope of the guidance in the amendments in ASU 2016-13. Entities must apply the standard provision as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2016-13 on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) (“ASU 2018-13”), which modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements. The amendments in this update are effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for any removed or modified disclosures. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2018-13 on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14, Compensation-Retirement Benefits-Defined Benefit Plans-General (Subtopic 715-20) (“ASU 2018-14”). ASU 2018-14 removes certain disclosures that are not considered cost beneficial, clarifies certain required disclosures and adds additional disclosures. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2020, with early adoption is permitted. The updated standard should be applied on a retrospective basis. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2018-14 on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In October 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-17, Consolidation (Topic 810): Targeted Improvements to Related Party Guidance for Variable Interest Entities (“ASU 2018-17”). The amendments in this Update for determining whether a decision-making fee is a variable interest require reporting entities to consider indirect interests held through related parties under common control on a proportional basis rather than as the equivalent of a direct interest in its entirety (as currently required in GAAP). Therefore, these amendments likely will result in more decision makers not having a variable interest through their decision-making arrangements. The amendments in this Update are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2018-17 on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-20
3. Acquisitions and Dispositions
Merger Agreement with Tribune
On
The merger agreement contains certain termination rights for both Nexstar and Tribune. If the merger agreement is terminated in connection with Tribune entering into a definitive agreement with respect to a superior proposal, as well as under certain other circumstances, the termination fee payable by Tribune to Nexstar will be $
The merger has been approved by the boards of directors of both companies and is projected to close late in the third quarter of 2019, subject to (i) the approval of the merger by the stockholders of Tribune, (ii) FCC approval, (iii) other regulatory approvals (including expiration of the applicable HSR waiting period) and (iv) satisfaction of other customary closing conditions. The merger does not require approval of Nexstar’s stockholders and is not subject to any financing contingency. On November 30, 2018, Nexstar received committed financing up to a maximum of $
In connection with obtaining the HSR approval and the FCC approval, Nexstar agreed to divest one or more television stations in certain DMAs. Those DMAs are: (i) Salt Lake City, UT; (ii) Grand Rapids-Kalamazoo-Battle Creek, MI; (iii) Wilkes Barre-Scranton, PA; (iv) Richmond-Petersburg, VA; (v) Des Moines-Ames, IA; (vi) Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News, VA; (vii) Fort Smith-Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR; (viii) Davenport, IA-Rock Island-Moline, IL; (ix) Memphis, TN; (x) Huntsville-Decatur (Florence), AL; (xi) Indianapolis, IN; (xii) Hartford-New Haven, CT and (xiii) Harrisburg, PA. Nexstar is required to designate one or more Tribune stations or Nexstar stations for divestiture in each DMA. Nexstar has also agreed to designate, at its option, certain additional Tribune stations or Nexstar stations for divestiture and to divest such stations in order to comply with the FCC national cap as required by the FCC in order to obtain approval of and consummate the transactions
Tribune is a diversified media and entertainment business, comprising of
2018 Acquisitions
LKQD
On
The sellers were also entitled to receive up to $
The acquisition of LKQD broadened and diversified Nexstar Digital’s portfolio with technologies that are complementary to its current offerings of digital solutions and services for media publishers, and multi-platform marketing solutions for local and national advertisers. Transaction costs relating to this acquisition, including legal and professional fees of $
F-21
The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition are as follows (in thousands):
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
Prepaids |
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired and consolidated |
|
|
|
|
Less: Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
( |
) |
Less: Taxes payable |
|
|
( |
) |
Less: Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
( |
) |
Net assets acquired and consolidated |
|
$ |
|
|
The fair value assigned to goodwill is attributable to future expense reductions utilizing management’s leverage in operating costs. The goodwill and other intangible assets are not deductible for tax purposes. Other intangible assets are amortized over an estimated weighted average useful life of approximately
During 2018, Nexstar Digital recorded measurement period adjustments including a decrease in accounts receivable of $
LKQD’s net revenue of $
WHDF
On
On July 15, 2018, Nexstar completed the first closing and acquired the station’s assets excluding certain transmission equipment, FCC licenses and network affiliation agreements for $
The acquisition was approved by the FCC on October 17, 2018 and Nexstar completed the second closing on November 9, 2018, acquiring the remaining assets and paying the remaining purchase price of $
Subject to final determination, which is expected to occur within 12 months of the acquisition date, the provisional fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the first and second closing are as follows (in thousands):
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
|
|
FCC licenses |
|
|
|
|
Network affiliation agreements |
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
Less: Accrued expenses |
|
|
( |
) |
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
|
|
Other intangible assets are amortized over an estimated weighted average useful life of
F-22
KRBK
On
On August 1, 2018, Nexstar completed the first closing of the acquisition and acquired the station’s assets excluding certain transmission equipment, FCC licenses and network affiliation agreements for $
The acquisition was approved by the FCC on October 17, 2018. On November 1, 2018, Nexstar acquired the remaining assets of KRBK, paid the owners the remaining purchase price of $
Subject to final determination, which is expected to occur within 12 months of the acquisition date, the provisional fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the first and second closing are as follows (in thousands):
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
|
|
Broadcast rights |
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
FCC licenses |
|
|
|
|
Network affiliation agreements |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
Less: Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
( |
) |
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
|
|
The fair value assigned to goodwill is attributable to future expense reductions utilizing management’s leverage in programming and other station operating costs. The goodwill and FCC licenses are deductible for tax purposes. The intangible assets related to the network affiliation agreements are amortized over
The station’s net revenue of $4.9 million and operating income of $2.2 million from August 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 have been included in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income. Transaction costs relating to the acquisition were not significant during the year ended December 31, 2018.
KHII
On
As discussed in Note 2, following the FCC approval on December 17, 2018, Nexstar became the primary beneficiary of its variable interest in KHII and the satellite stations. Therefore, as of December 17, 2018 and transactions thereafter, the stations’ assets that Nexstar agreed to acquire pursuant to the purchase agreement were consolidated into Nexstar’s financial statements under authoritative guidance related to the consolidation of VIEs. The consolidation of the assets of the KHII stations resulted in noncontrolling interests of $
F-23
Subject to final determination, which is expected to occur within 12 months of the acquisition date, the provisional fair values of the stations’ assets consolidated into Nexstar are as follows (in thousands):
Property and equipment |
|
$ |
|
|
FCC licenses |
|
|
|
|
Network affiliation agreements |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated assets of VIE |
|
$ |
|
|
On January 28, 2019, Nexstar completed its acquisition of KHII and paid the remaining purchase price of $
The station’s net revenue and operating income from November 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 were not significant.
F-24
2017 Acquisitions
Merger with Media General
On
Market Rank at Acquisition |
|
|
Market |
|
Full Power Stations |
|
Primary Affiliation |
|
Nexstar: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
San Francisco, CA |
|
KRON |
|
MNTV |
|
11 |
|
|
Tampa, FL |
|
WFLA, WTTA |
|
NBC, MNTV |
|
24 |
|
|
Raleigh, NC |
|
WNCN |
|
CBS |
|
25 |
|
|
Portland, OR |
|
KOIN |
|
CBS |
|
27 |
|
|
Indianapolis, IN |
|
WISH, WNDY |
|
The CW, MNTV |
|
29 |
|
|
Nashville, TN |
|
WKRN |
|
ABC |
|
30 |
|
|
New Haven, CT |
|
WTNH, WCTX |
|
ABC, MNTV |
|
32 |
|
|
Columbus, OH |
|
WCMH |
|
NBC |
|
37 |
|
|
Spartanburg, SC |
|
WSPA, WYCW |
|
CBS, The CW |
|
39 |
|
|
Austin, TX |
|
KXAN, KBVO |
|
NBC, MNTV |
|
42 |
|
|
Portsmouth, VA |
|
WAVY, WVBT |
|
NBC, FOX |
|
43 |
|
|
Harrisburg, PA |
|
WHTM |
|
ABC |
|
44 |
|
|
Grand Rapids, MI |
|
WOOD, WOTV |
|
NBC, ABC |
|
45 |
|
|
Birmingham, AL |
|
WIAT |
|
CBS |
|
48 |
|
|
Albuquerque, NM |
|
KRQE, KREZ, KBIM |
|
CBS |
|
52 |
|
|
Providence, RI |
|
WPRI |
|
CBS |
|
53 |
|
|
Buffalo, NY |
|
WIVB, WNLO |
|
CBS, The CW |
|
55 |
|
|
Richmond, VA |
|
WRIC |
|
ABC |
|
59 |
|
|
Albany, NY |
|
WTEN, WCDC |
|
ABC, ABC |
|
60 |
|
|
Mobile, AL |
|
WKRG, WFNA |
|
CBS, The CW |
|
62 |
|
|
Knoxville, TN |
|
WATE |
|
ABC |
|
64 |
|
|
Dayton, OH |
|
WDTN |
|
NBC |
|
65 |
|
|
Honolulu, HI |
|
KHON, KHAW, KAII |
|
FOX, FOX, FOX |
|
66 |
|
|
Wichita, KS |
|
KSNW, KSNC, KSNG, KSNK |
|
NBC |
|
88 |
|
|
Colorado Springs, CO |
|
KXRM |
|
FOX |
|
91 |
|
|
Savannah, GA |
|
WSAV |
|
NBC |
|
94 |
|
|
Charleston, SC |
|
WCBD |
|
NBC |
|
95 |
|
|
Jackson, MS |
|
WJTV |
|
CBS |
|
98 |
|
|
Tri-Cities, TN-VA |
|
WJHL |
|
CBS |
|
100 |
|
|
Greenville, NC |
|
WNCT |
|
CBS |
|
102 |
|
|
Florence, SC |
|
WBTW |
|
CBS |
|
109 |
|
|
Sioux Falls, SD |
|
KELO, KDLO, KPLO |
|
CBS |
|
110 |
|
|
Ft. Wayne, IN |
|
WANE |
|
CBS |
|
111 |
|
|
Augusta, GA |
|
WJBF |
|
ABC |
|
113 |
|
|
Lansing, MI |
|
WLNS |
|
CBS |
|
114 |
|
|
Springfield, MA |
|
WWLP |
|
NBC |
|
115 |
|
|
Youngstown, OH |
|
WKBN |
|
CBS |
|
120 |
|
|
Lafayette, LA |
|
KLFY |
|
CBS |
|
127 |
|
|
Columbus, GA |
|
WRBL |
|
CBS |
|
135 |
|
|
Topeka, KS |
|
KSNT |
|
NBC |
|
168 |
|
|
Hattiesburg, MS |
|
WHLT |
|
CBS |
|
172 |
|
|
Rapid City, SD |
|
KCLO |
|
CBS |
VIEs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
Austin, TX |
|
KNVA |
|
The CW |
|
48 |
|
|
Alburquerque, NM |
|
KASY, KRWB, KWBQ |
|
MNTV, The CW, The CW |
|
52 |
|
|
Providence, RI |
|
WNAC |
|
FOX |
|
59 |
|
|
Albany, NY |
|
WXXA |
|
FOX |
|
64 |
|
|
Dayton, OH |
|
WBDT |
|
NBC |
|
113 |
|
|
Lansing, MI |
|
WLAJ |
|
ABC |
|
115 |
|
|
Youngstown, OH |
|
WYTV |
|
ABC |
|
135 |
|
|
Topeka, KS |
|
KTKA |
|
ABC |
As discussed in Note 2, Nexstar is the primary beneficiary of its variable interests in Shield, Tamer, Vaughan, WNAC, LLC and 54 Broadcasting and has consolidated these entities, including the stations they own.
F-25
Upon the completion of the merger, each issued and outstanding share of common stock, no par value, of Media General immediately prior to the effective time of the merger, other than shares or other securities representing capital stock in Media General owned, directly or indirectly, by Nexstar or any subsidiary of Media General, was converted into the right to receive (i) $
Upon the completion of the merger, each unvested Media General stock option outstanding immediately prior to the effective time became fully vested and was converted into an option to purchase Nexstar Common Stock at the same aggregate price as provided in the underlying Media General stock option, with the number of shares of Nexstar Common Stock adjusted to account for the Cash Consideration and the exchange ratio for the Stock Consideration. Additionally, the holders of Media General stock options received one CVR for each share subject to the Media General stock option immediately prior to the effective time. All other equity-based awards of Media General outstanding immediately prior to the merger vested in full and were converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration.
The following table summarizes the components of the total consideration paid, payable or issued upon closing of the merger (in thousands):
Cash Consideration |
|
$ |
|
|
Nexstar Common Stock issued ( |
|
|
|
|
Reissued Nexstar Common Stock from treasury ( |
|
|
|
|
Stock option replacement awards ( |
|
|
|
|
Repayment of Media General debt, including premium and accrued interest |
|
|
|
|
Contingent consideration liability (CVR) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Concurrent with the closing of the merger, Nexstar sold the assets of
F-26
The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed (net of the effects of the Media General Divestitures but including the consolidation of the assets and liabilities of Shield, Tamer, Vaughan, WNAC, LLC and 54 Broadcasting) are as follows (in thousands):
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
Spectrum asset |
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
FCC licenses |
|
|
|
|
Network affiliation agreements |
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired and consolidated |
|
|
|
|
Less: Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
( |
) |
Less: Taxes payable |
|
|
( |
) |
Less: Interest payable |
|
|
( |
) |
Less: Debt |
|
|
( |
) |
Less: Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
( |
) |
Less: Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
( |
) |
Less: Noncontrolling interests in consolidated VIEs |
|
|
( |
) |
Net assets acquired and consolidated |
|
$ |
|
|
The estimated acquisition date fair value of Media General’s spectrum auctioned with the FCC (spectrum asset) is $
On July 21, 2017, the Company received $
On August 28, 2017, Nexstar completed the $
The fair value assigned to goodwill is attributable to future expense reductions utilizing management’s leverage in operating costs. The intangible assets related to the network affiliation agreements are amortized over
Nexstar assumed the $
Nexstar also assumed Media General’s pension and postretirement obligations (included in other noncurrent liabilities). See Note 8 for additional information.
F-27
The consolidation of Shield, Tamer, Vaughan, WNAC, LLC and 54 Broadcasting resulted in noncontrolling interests of $
The Cash Consideration, the repayment of Media General debt, including premium and accrued interest, and the related fees and expenses were funded through a combination of cash on hand, proceeds from the Nexstar Divestitures and the Media General Divestitures and borrowings during 2017.
During 2017, Nexstar recorded measurement period adjustments, including (i) the result of our ongoing valuation procedures on acquired intangible assets which decreased property and equipment, FCC licenses and other intangible assets by $
The acquisition’s net revenue of $
Transaction costs relating to the merger, including legal and professional fees and severance costs, were $
WVMH
On
On January 4, 2016, Nexstar completed the first closing of the transaction and acquired the stations’ assets excluding certain transmission equipment, the FCC licenses and network affiliation agreements for $
The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the first closing are as follows (in thousands):
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired at first closing |
|
|
|
|
Less: Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
( |
) |
Less: Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
( |
) |
Net assets acquired at first closing |
|
|
|
|
Deposit on second closing |
|
|
|
|
Total paid at first closing |
|
$ |
|
|
Other intangible assets are amortized over an estimated weighted average useful life of
F-28
Nexstar became the primary beneficiary of its variable interests in WVMH’s stations upon receiving FCC approval on August 2, 2016 to acquire the stations’ remaining assets. Therefore, Nexstar has consolidated these remaining assets under authoritative guidance related to the consolidation of VIEs as of this date.
Broadcast rights |
|
$ |
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
FCC licenses |
|
|
|
|
Network affiliation agreements |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated assets of VIEs |
|
|
|
|
Less: Broadcast rights payable |
|
|
( |
) |
Consolidated net asset of VIEs |
|
$ |
|
|
The fair value assigned to goodwill is attributable to future expense reductions utilizing management’s leverage in programming and other station operating costs. The goodwill and FCC licenses are deductible for tax purposes. The intangible assets related to the network affiliation agreements are amortized over
On January 31, 2017, Nexstar completed its acquisition of the remaining assets of the stations and paid WVMH the remaining purchase price of $
The stations’ net revenue of $
Parker
On May 27, 2014, Mission assumed the rights, title and interest to an existing purchase agreement to acquire Parker Broadcasting of Colorado, LLC (“Parker”), the owner of television station KFQX, the FOX affiliate in the Grand Junction, Colorado market, for $
The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are as follows (in thousands):
FCC licenses |
|
$ |
|
|
Network affiliation agreements |
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
$ |
|
|
The fair value assigned to goodwill is attributable to future expense reductions utilizing management’s leverage in programming and other station operating costs. The goodwill and FCC licenses are deductible for tax purposes. The intangible assets related to the network affiliation agreements are amortized over
Nexstar had a variable interest in Parker and had consolidated this entity until Mission acquired Parker’s outstanding equity. Since Nexstar no longer has variable interests in Parker, its accounts were deconsolidated from Nexstar’s financial statements. However, since Nexstar is the primary beneficiary of variable interests in Mission, it retained a beneficial financial interest in KFQX and continued to consolidate this station. (See Note 2)
WLWC-TV
On
F-29
The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are as follows (in thousands):
Broadcast rights |
|
$ |
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
Network affiliation |
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
Less: Broadcast rights payable |
|
|
( |
) |
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
|
|
Nexstar accounted for the transaction as an asset purchase because it was concentrated in acquiring the station’s affiliation with the CW. Additionally, the FCC license, a significant input to operate a station, was not acquired by Nexstar. Thus,
2016 Acquisitions
Reiten
On
The stations’ net revenue of $
KCWI
On
KCWI’s net revenue of $
Unaudited Pro Forma Information
Other than Media General, the acquisitions completed during 2018, 2017 and 2016 are not significant for financial reporting purposes, both individually and in aggregate. Therefore, pro forma information has not been provided for these acquisitions.
The following unaudited pro forma information has been presented for the periods indicated as if the acquisition of Media General and the related consolidation of VIEs had occurred on January 1, 2016 (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
||
Net revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Nexstar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share attributable to Nexstar - basic |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Net income per common share attributable to Nexstar - diluted |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
F-30
The above selected unaudited pro forma information is presented for illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of results of operations in future periods or results that would have been achieved had the Company owned the acquired stations during the specified periods.
4. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consisted of the following, as of December 31 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
useful life, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in years |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||
Buildings and improvements |
|
39 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Land |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
term of lease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Studio and transmission equipment |
|
5-15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computer equipment |
|
3-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicles |
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction in progress |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
The increase in property and equipment primarily relates to spectrum repack projects, routine purchases of property and equipment, less disposals, and business acquisitions (see Note 3).
Property under capital lease with a cost of $
5. Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Intangible assets subject to amortization consisted of the following, as of December 31 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Estimated |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
useful life, |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
in years |
|
Gross |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
||||||
Network affiliation agreements |
|
15 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Other definite-lived intangible assets |
|
1-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
The increases in network affiliation agreements and other definite-lived intangible assets relate to Company acquisitions (see Note 3).
In the fourth quarter of 2018, management reviewed the recoverability of other definite-lived intangible assets attributable to two of Nexstar’s digital businesses as a result of shortfalls from operating forecasts and increased levels of competition. Based on the analysis of estimated undiscounted future pre-tax cash flows expected to result from the use of these assets, management determined that their carrying values were recoverable as of December 31, 2018. No other events or circumstances were noted in 2018 that would indicate impairment.
In the fourth quarter of 2017, management reviewed the recoverability of other definite-lived intangible assets attributable to Nexstar’s digital businesses and recognized total impairment charges of $
F-31
The following table presents the Company’s estimate of amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years and thereafter for definite-lived intangible assets as of December 31, 2018 (in thousands):
2019 |
|
$ |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
2022 |
|
|
|
|
2023 |
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
The changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill and FCC licenses for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
FCC Licenses |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
Net |
|
||||||
Balances as of December 31, 2016 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Acquisitions and consolidation of VIEs (See Notes 2 and 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Nexstar Divestitures (See Note 3) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Deconsolidation of a VIE |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Impairment |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
(11,517 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Balances as of December 31, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions and consolidation of VIEs (See Notes 2 and 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
(19,911 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Balances as of December 31, 2018 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
As discussed in Note 2, the Company has
In the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company performed its annual impairment tests on goodwill and FCC licenses attributable to the broadcast business using the qualitative analysis approach and concluded that it was more likely than not that their fair values would sufficiently exceed the carrying amounts.
In the fourth quarter of 2018, management performed quantitative impairment tests on two of its digital reporting units as a result of shortfalls from operating forecasts and increased levels of competition. The quantitative analyses were performed using a combination of a discounted cash flows analysis and market revenue multiples analysis, including the following key assumptions: (i) compound annual growth rate ranging from
In the fourth quarter of 2017, management performed the one-step quantitative impairment tests on each of its three digital reporting units as a result of shortfalls from operating forecasts and increased levels of competition. The Company’s analyses resulted in total impairment charges of $
F-32
6. Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses consisted of the following, as of December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||
Compensation and related taxes |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Network affiliation fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
7. Debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following, as of December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||
Term loans, net of financing costs and discount of $ |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Revolving loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: current portion |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Nexstar Senior Secured Credit Facility
On January 16, 2018, Nexstar borrowed $
On July 27, 2018, Nexstar reallocated $
On October 26, 2018, Nexstar amended its senior secured credit facility. The amendment extended the maturity date of Term Loan A and revolving credit facility from
Through December 2018, Nexstar prepaid a total of $
The refinancing of loans and prepayments of debt during 2018 resulted in a total loss of extinguishment of debt of $
On November 30, 2018, Nexstar received committed financing up to a maximum of $
As of December 31, 2018, Nexstar’s Term Loan B and Term Loan A, net of financing costs and discounts, had balances of $
F-33
Interest rates are selected at Nexstar’s option and the applicable margin is adjusted quarterly as defined in Nexstar’s amended credit agreement. The interest rate of Nexstar’s Term Loan A was
Mission Senior Secured Credit Facility
On October 26, 2018, Mission amended its senior secured credit facility. The amendment extended the maturity date of Mission’s revolving credit facility from
During the year ended December 31, 2018, Mission repaid scheduled maturities of $
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, Mission’s Term Loan B, net of financing costs and discounts, had balances of $
Terms of the Mission senior secured credit facility, including repayment, maturity and interest rates, are the same as the terms of the Nexstar senior secured facility described above. Interest rates are selected at Mission’s option and the applicable margin is adjusted quarterly as defined in Mission’s amended credit agreement. The interest rate of Mission’s Term Loan B was
Marshall Senior Secured Credit Facility
On June 28, 2018, Marshall amended its senior secured credit facility. The amendment refinanced the then outstanding principal balances of Marshall’s Term Loan A and revolving credit facility of $
On July 27, 2018, Marshall drew the full $
During the year ended December 31, 2018, Marshall repaid $
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, Marshall’s Term Loan A, net of financing costs and discounts, had balances of $
Interest rates are selected at Marshall’s option and the applicable margin is adjusted quarterly as defined in Marshall’s amended credit agreement. The interest rate on Marshall’s Term Loan A and revolving credit facility was
Shield Senior Secured Credit Facility
On October 26, 2018, Shield amended its senior secured credit facility. The amendment extended the maturity date of its Term Loan A from
During the year ended December 31, 2018, Shield repaid $
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, Shield’s Term Loan A, net of financing costs and discounts, had a balance of $
Terms of the Shield senior secured credit facility, including repayment, maturity and interest rates, are the same as the terms of the Nexstar senior secured credit facility described above. Interest rates are selected at Shield’s option and the applicable margin is adjusted quarterly as defined in Shield’s amended credit agreement. The interest rate on Shield’s Term Loan A was
F-34
Unused Commitments and Borrowing Availability
The Company had $
On November 30, 2018, Nexstar received committed financing up to a maximum of $
5.875% Notes
As part of Nexstar’s merger with Media General on January 17, 2017, Nexstar assumed the $
The 5.875% Notes will mature on
The 5.875% Notes are senior obligations of Nexstar but junior to the secured debt, to the extent of the value of the assets securing such debt. The 5.875% Notes rank equal to the 5.625% Notes and the 6.125% Notes.
At any time on or after November 15, 2017, Nexstar may redeem the 5.875% Notes, in whole or in part, at the redemption prices set forth in the 5.875% Indenture. At any time before August 1, 2019, Nexstar may also redeem the 5.875% Notes at
Upon the occurrence of a change of control (as defined in the 5.875% Indenture), each holder of the 5.875% Notes may require Nexstar to repurchase all or a portion of the 5.875% Notes in cash at a price equal to
The 5.875% Indenture contains covenants that limit, among other things, Nexstar’s ability to (1) incur additional debt, (2) make certain restricted payments, (3) consummate specified asset sales, (4) enter into transactions with affiliates, (5) create liens, (6) pay dividends or make other distributions, (7) repurchase or redeem capital, (8) merge or consolidate with another person and (9) enter new lines of business.
The 5.875% Indenture provides for customary events of default (subject in certain cases to customary grace and cure periods), which include nonpayment, breach of covenants in the 5.875% Indenture, payment defaults or acceleration of other indebtedness, a failure to pay certain judgments, certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency and any guarantee of the 5.875% Notes that ceases to be in full force and effect with certain exceptions specified in the 5.875% Indenture. Generally, if an event of default occurs, the Trustee or holders of at least
5.625% Notes
On July 27, 2016, Nexstar completed the issuance and sale of $
The 5.625% Notes will mature on
The 5.625% Notes are senior obligations of Nexstar and Mission but junior to the secured debt to the extent of the value of the assets securing such debt. The 5.625% Notes rank equal to the 5.875% Notes and the 6.125% Notes.
F-35
Nexstar has the option to redeem all or a portion of the 5.625% Notes at any time prior to August 1, 2019 at a price equal to
Upon the occurrence of a change in control (as defined in the 5.625% Indenture), each holder of the 5.625% Notes may require Nexstar to repurchase all or a portion of the 5.625% Notes in cash at a price equal to
The 5.625% Indenture contains covenants that limit, among other things, Nexstar’s ability to (1) incur additional debt, (2) pay dividends or make other distributions or repurchases or redeem its capital stock, (3) make certain investments, (4) create liens, (5) merge or consolidate with another person or transfer or sell assets, (6) enter into restrictions affecting the ability of Nexstar’s restricted subsidiaries to make distributions, loans or advances to it or other restricted subsidiaries, (7) prepay, redeem or repurchase certain indebtedness and (8) engage in transactions with affiliates.
The 5.625% Indenture provides for customary events of default (subject in certain cases to customary grace and cure periods), which include nonpayment, breach of covenants in the Indenture, payment defaults or acceleration of other indebtedness, a failure to pay certain judgments and certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency. Generally, if an event of default occurs, the Trustee or holders of at least
In 2016, Nexstar recorded $
6.125% Senior Unsecured Notes
On January 29, 2015, Nexstar completed the issuance and sale of $
The 6.125% Notes will mature on
The 6.125% Notes are senior obligations of Nexstar and Mission but junior to the secured debt, including the Nexstar Facility, the Mission Facility and the Marshall Facility to the extent of the value of the assets securing such debt. The 6.125% Notes rank equal to the 5.625% Notes and 5.875% Notes.
Nexstar has the option to redeem all or a portion of the 6.125% Notes at any time after February 15, 2018 at the redemption prices set forth in the 6.125% Indenture. At any time before February 15, 2018, Nexstar may also redeem up to
Upon the occurrence of a change in control (as defined in the 6.125% Indenture), each holder of the 6.125% Notes may require Nexstar to repurchase all or a portion of the 6.125% Notes in cash at a price equal to
The 6.125% Indenture contains covenants that limit, among other things, Nexstar’s ability to (1) incur additional debt, (2) pay dividends or make other distributions or repurchases or redeem its capital stock, (3) make certain investments, (4) create liens, (5) merge or consolidate with another person or transfer or sell assets, (6) enter into restrictions affecting the ability of Nexstar’s restricted subsidiaries to make distributions, loans or advances to it or other restricted subsidiaries; prepay, redeem or repurchase certain indebtedness and (7) engage in transactions with affiliates.
The 6.125% Indenture provides for customary events of default (subject in certain cases to customary grace and cure periods), which include nonpayment, breach of covenants in the Indenture, payment defaults or acceleration of other indebtedness, a failure to pay certain judgments and certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency. Generally, if an event of default occurs, the Trustee or holders of at least
F-36
In 2015, Nexstar recorded $
Collateralization and Guarantees of Debt
The Company’s credit facilities described above are collateralized by a security interest in substantially all the combined assets, excluding FCC licenses and the other assets of consolidated VIEs unavailable to creditors of Nexstar (See Note 2). Nexstar guarantees full payment of all obligations incurred under the Mission, Marshall and Shield senior secured credit facilities in the event of their default. Mission and Nexstar Digital, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nexstar, are guarantors of Nexstar’s senior secured credit facility. Mission is also a guarantor of Nexstar’s 6.125% Notes and the 5.625% Notes but does not guarantee Nexstar’s 5.875% Notes. Nexstar Digital does not guarantee any of the notes. Marshall and Shield are not guarantors of any debt within the group.
In consideration of Nexstar’s guarantee of the Mission senior secured credit facility, Mission has granted Nexstar purchase options to acquire the assets and assume the liabilities of each Mission station, subject to FCC consent. These option agreements (which expire on various dates between 2021 and 2028) are freely exercisable or assignable by Nexstar without consent or approval by Mission. The Company expects these option agreements to be renewed upon expiration.
Debt Covenants
The Nexstar credit agreement (senior secured credit facility) contains a covenant which requires Nexstar to comply with a maximum consolidated first lien net leverage ratio of
Fair Value of Debt
The aggregate carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s debt were as follows, as of December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
||||
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
||||
Term loans(1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Revolving loans(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.125% Senior unsecured notes(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.875% Senior unsecured notes(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.625% Senior unsecured notes(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
(2) |
|
Debt Maturities
The scheduled maturities of the Company’s debt, excluding the unamortized financing costs, discounts and premium, as of December 31, 2018 are summarized as follows (in thousands):
2019 |
|
$ |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
2022 |
|
|
|
|
2023 |
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
F-37
8. Retirement and Postretirement Plans
The Company has a funded, qualified non-contributory defined benefit retirement plan which covers certain employees and former employees. Additionally, there are non-contributory unfunded supplemental executive retirement and ERISA excess plans which supplement the coverage available to certain executives. All of these retirement plans are frozen. The Company also has a retiree medical savings account plan which reimburses eligible retired employees for certain medical expenses and an unfunded plan that provides certain health and life insurance benefits to retired employees who were hired prior to 1992.
The Company uses a December 31 measurement date for its pension and other postretirement benefit plans (“OPEB”). The Company recognizes the underfunded status of these plan liabilities on its Consolidated Balance Sheet. The funded status of a plan represents the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the related plan projected benefit obligation. Changes in the funded status are recognized in other comprehensive income and amortized into comprehensive income over a
Benefit Obligations
The following table provides a reconciliation of the changes in the plans’ benefit obligations for the periods January 17, 2017 to December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 (in thousands):
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
OPEB |
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
OPEB |
|
||||
Change in benefit obligation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Service cost |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participant contributions |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Plan settlements(1) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Divestiture transfer(2) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Actuarial (gain) loss |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit payments |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Benefit obligation at end of period(3)(4) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
(2) |
|
|
(3) |
|
|
(4) |
|
The Plans’ benefit obligations were determined using the following assumptions:
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
OPEB |
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
OPEB |
|
||||
Discount rate |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
Compensation increase rate |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
% |
F-38
Plan Assets
The following table provides a reconciliation of the changes in the fair value of the plans’ assets for the periods January 17, 2017 to December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 (in thousands):
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
OPEB |
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
OPEB |
|
||||
Change in plan assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Employer contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participant contributions |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Plan settlements |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Benefit payments |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Fair value of plan assets at end of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Under the fair value hierarchy, $
The asset allocation for the Company’s funded retirement plans at the end of 2018, and the asset allocation range for 2019, by asset category, are as follows:
|
|
Asset Allocation |
|
|
Percentage of Plan Assets at Year End |
|
|
Asset Category |
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income securities/cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As the plan sponsor of the funded retirement plans, the Company’s investment strategy is to achieve a rate of return on the plans’ assets that, over the long-term, will fund the plans’ benefit payments and will provide for other required amounts in a manner that satisfies all fiduciary responsibilities. A determinant of the plans’ returns is the asset allocation policy. The Company’s investment policy provides ranges (
The plans’ investment policy is reviewed frequently and administered by an investment consultant. Periodically, the Company evaluates each investment with the investment consultant to determine if the overall portfolio has performed satisfactorily when compared to the defined objectives, similarly invested portfolios and specific market indices. The policy contains general guidelines for prohibited transactions such as:
|
• |
borrowing of money |
|
• |
purchase of securities on margin |
|
• |
short sales |
|
• |
pledging any securities except loans of securities that are fully-collateralized |
|
• |
purchase or sale of futures or options for speculation or leverage |
F-39
Restricted transactions include:
|
• |
purchase or sale of commodities, commodity contracts or illiquid interests in real estate or mortgages |
|
• |
purchase of illiquid securities such as private placements |
|
• |
use of various futures and options for hedging or for taking limited risks with a portion of the portfolio’s assets |
Investments in Common Collective Trust Funds do not have any unfunded commitments, and do not have any applicable liquidation periods or defined terms and periods to be held. The portfolios offer daily liquidity; however, they request 5 business days’ notice for both withdrawals and redemptions. Strategies of the Common Collective Trust Funds by major category are as follows:
|
• |
Equity Common Collective Trusts are primarily invested in funds seeking investment results that correspond to the total return performance of their respective benchmarks in both the U.S. and International markets. |
|
• |
Fixed Income Common Collective Trusts are primarily invested in funds with an investment objective to provide investment returns through fixed-income and commingled investment vehicles that seek to outperform their respective benchmarks. |
|
• |
Real Estate and Real Asset Common Collective Trusts seek to achieve high current return and long-term capital growth by investing in equity securities of real estate investment trusts that seek to outperform their respective benchmarks. |
Funded Status
The following table provides a statement of the funded status of the plans at December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
OPEB |
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
OPEB |
|
||||
Amounts recorded in the balance sheet: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
Noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Funded status |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
The following table provides a summary of the Company’s accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to pension and other postretirement benefit plans prior to any deferred tax effects (in thousands):
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
OPEB |
|
||
January 17, 2017 |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Actuarial gain (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
December 31, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Actuarial (loss) gain |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2018 |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
The estimated net loss for the other postretirement benefit plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost in 2019 is $
F-40
Expected Cash Flows
The following table includes amounts that are expected to be contributed to the plans by the Company, in thousands. It additionally reflects benefit payments that are made from the plans’ assets as well as those made directly from the Company’s assets, and it includes the participants’ share of the costs, which is funded by participant contributions. The amounts in the table are actuarially determined and reflect the Company’s best estimate given its current knowledge including the impact of recent pension funding relief legislation. Actual amounts could be materially different.
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
OPEB |
|
||
Employer Contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019 to participant benefits |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Expected Benefit Payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-2028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Periodic Benefit Cost
The following table provides the components of net periodic benefit cost (credit) for the plans for the periods January 17, 2017 to December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 (in thousands):
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
OPEB |
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
OPEB |
|
||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Amortization of net loss |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Settlement gain recognized |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Net periodic benefit cost (credit) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
The Company anticipates recording an aggregate net periodic benefit credit of $
The net periodic costs for the Company’s pension and other benefit plans were determined using the following assumptions:
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
OPEB |
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
OPEB |
|
||||
Discount rate |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
- |
|
Compensation increase rate |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
% |
The reasonableness of the expected return on the funded retirement plan assets was assessed with the assistance of an investment consultant, but all assumptions were reviewed by management. Their proprietary model simulates possible capital market scenarios based on the current economic environment and their capital market assumptions to come up with expected returns for the portfolio based on the current asset allocation.
F-41
Defined Contribution Plans
The Company has established retirement savings plans under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Plans”). The Plans cover substantially all Company employees who meet the minimum age and service requirements and allow participants to defer a portion of their annual compensation on a pre-tax basis. Employer contributions to the Plans may be made at the discretion of management of the Company. During the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, Nexstar contributed $
The Company has a Supplemental Income Deferral Plan for which certain employees, including executive officers, were eligible. The plan provides benefits to highly compensated employees in circumstances in which the maximum limits established under the ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code prevent them from receiving Company contributions. The amounts recorded by the Company for these plans for 2018 is nominal.
9. Common Stock
The holders of Class A common stock are entitled to
The common stockholders are entitled to receive cash dividends, subject to the rights of holders of any series of preferred stock, on an equal per share basis. The Nexstar Facility provides limits on the amounts of dividends the Company may pay to stockholders over the term of the Nexstar Credit Agreement.
On
In 2018, 2017 and 2016, the board of directors declared annual cash dividends of $
On April 26, 2018, Nexstar’s Board of Directors approved an additional $
During the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016,
In connection with the acquisition of Media General on January 17, 2017, Nexstar issued
F-42
10. Stock-Based Compensation Plans
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
The Company measures compensation cost related to stock options based on the grant-date fair value of the awards, calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The compensation cost related to time-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance-based restricted stock units (“PSUs”) is based on the market price of the stock on the date of the award. The fair values of the stock options and RSUs are recognized ratably over their respective vesting periods. The fair values of PSUs are recognized when it is probable that the performance conditions will be achieved.
In 2017, Nexstar issued
Expected volatility |
|
32.4% to 47.7% |
|
|
Risk-free interest rates |
|
0.5% to 2.2% |
|
|
Expected life |
|
|
|
|
Dividend yields |
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average grant date fair value per share |
|
$ |
|
|
The expected volatility assumptions used for stock option grants were based on Nexstar’s historical volatility rates over a period approximating the expected life of the options. The expected term assumption is calculated utilizing Nexstar’s historical exercise and post-vesting cancellation experience combined with expectations developed over outstanding options. The risk-free interest rates used are based on the daily U.S. Treasury yield curve rate in effect at the time of the grant having a period commensurate with the expected term assumption. The expected dividend yield is based on the current annual dividend divided by the stock price on the date of grant.
The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $
Stock-Based Compensation Plans
Nexstar has two stock-based compensation plans that provide for the granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, RSUs and PSUs to directors, employees or consultants of Nexstar: the 2015 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan, approved by Nexstar’s majority stockholders on June 11, 2015 (the “2015 Plan”) and the 2012 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan, approved by Nexstar’s majority stockholders on September 26, 2012 (the “2012 Plan”). A maximum of
At December 31, 2018,
Stock Options
Options are granted with an exercise price at least equal to the fair market value of the underlying shares of common stock on the date of the grant, vest over a range of
F-43
The following table summarizes activity and information related to stock options for the year ended December 31, 2018:
|
|
Outstanding Options |
|
|
Non-Vested Options |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
||||
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Term (Years) |
|
|
(thousands) |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
||||||
Outstanding as of December 31, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
5.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Exercised |
|
|
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Vested |
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled |
|
|
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Balances as of December 31, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
4.05 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Exercisable as of December 31, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
4.05 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the closing market price of Nexstar’s common stock on the last day of the fiscal period, which was $
Time-Based Restricted Stock Units
The RSUs vest over a range of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
Unvested |
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
||
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
||
Unvested as of December 31, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Awarded |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Vested |
|
|
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled |
|
|
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Unvested as of December 31, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units
The vesting of the PSUs is contingent on the continued service of the grantee and the achievement of specific performance metrics (generally over a three-year period) designated by the Board of Directors of the Company. All unvested PSUs are forfeited immediately upon the employee’s termination for any reason other than change of control. The following table summarizes activity and information related to PSUs for the year ended December 31, 2018:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
Unvested |
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
||
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
||
Unvested as of December 31, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Awarded |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Vested |
|
|
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled |
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Unvested as of December 31, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
F-44
11. Income Taxes
The income tax expense (benefit) consisted of the following components for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||
Current tax expense (benefit): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax (benefit) expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
The following is a reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to income tax expense for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||
Federal income tax at the statutory rate |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
State and local taxes, net of federal benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nondeductible compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nontaxable proceeds on station divestiture |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Nondeductible earnout payments |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Nondeductible acquisition costs |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nondeductible meals and entertainment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nondeductible goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic production activities deduction |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Excess tax benefit on stock-based compensation |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Disposition of nondeductible goodwill |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Impact of federal tax rate reduction |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Change in beginning of year valuation allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Other |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Act”) was signed into law making significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code. The Act reduces the federal corporate income tax rate from
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”), issued by the SEC on December 22, 2017, provides guidance to assist filers in accounting for the impact of the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”). SAB 118 outlines the approach companies may take if they determine that the necessary information is not available (in reasonable detail) to evaluate, compute and prepare accounting entries to recognize the effects of the Act by the time the financial statements are required to be filed. Companies may use this approach when the timely determination of some or all of the income tax effect(s) from the Act is incomplete by the due date of the financial statements. The SAB divides items into three different buckets: 1. Items where there is sufficient time and information to complete the accounting as of the reporting date. 2. Items where provisional estimates can be reasonably determined as of the reporting date. 3. Items where a reasonable estimate cannot be determined as of the reporting date. SAB 118 allows filers to make measurement period adjustments for up to 12 months for items where an estimate has been used or a reasonable estimate could not be determined as of the reporting date.
F-45
The Company completed its analysis through the measurement period. During the measurement period, based upon Treasury Regulations issued in 2018, the deductibility of officer stock compensation under 162(m) was adjusted. There were no other changes.
The components of the net deferred tax asset (liability) were as follows, as of December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Total deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Other intangible assets |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Goodwill |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
FCC licenses |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Other |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Total deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Net deferred tax liabilities |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
As of December 31, 2018, the Company had a valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets of $
As of December 31, 2018, the Company's reserve for uncertain tax positions totaled approximately $12.5 million. For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 there were $
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the gross liability for uncertain tax positions is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||
Uncertain tax position liability at the beginning of the year |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Increases resulting from merger transaction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Increases related to tax positions taken during the current period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Increases related to tax positions taken during prior periods |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Decreases related to tax positions taken during prior periods |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Decreases related to expiration of statute of limitations |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Uncertain tax position liability at the end of the year |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
There can be no assurance that the outcomes from any tax examinations will not have a significant impact on the amount of such liabilities, which could have an impact on the operating results or financial position of the Company.
Interest expense and penalties related to the Company’s uncertain tax positions are reflected as a component of income tax benefit (expense) in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. The Company is subject to U.S. federal tax examinations for years after 2014. Additionally, any NOLs that were generated in prior years and utilized in the current year or future years may also be subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service. Generally, the Company is subject to state tax examination for years after 2014 and any NOLs that were generated in prior years and utilized in the current year or future years may also be subject to examination.
F-46
The Company has gross federal and state income tax NOL carryforwards of $
The ability to use NOLs is also dependent upon the Company’s ability to generate taxable income. The NOLs could expire before the Company generates sufficient taxable income. To the extent the Company’s use of NOLs is significantly limited, the Company’s income could be subject to corporate income tax earlier than it would if it were able to use NOLs, which could have a negative effect on the Company’s financial results and operations. Changes in ownership are largely beyond the Company’s control and the Company can give no assurance that it will continue to have realizable NOLs.
12. FCC Regulatory Matters
Television broadcasting is subject to the jurisdiction of the FCC under the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the “Communications Act”). The Communications Act prohibits the operation of television broadcasting stations except under a license issued by the FCC, and empowers the FCC, among other things, to issue, revoke, and modify broadcasting licenses, determine the location of television stations, regulate the equipment used by television stations, adopt regulations to carry out the provisions of the Communications Act and impose penalties for the violation of such regulations. The FCC’s ongoing rule making proceedings could have a significant future impact on the television industry and on the operation of the Company’s stations and the stations to which it provides services. In addition, the U.S. Congress may act to amend the Communications Act or adopt other legislation in a manner that could impact the Company’s stations, the stations to which it provides services and the television broadcast industry in general.
The FCC has adopted rules with respect to the final conversion of existing low power and television translator stations to digital operations, which must be completed by July 2021.
Media Ownership
The FCC is required to review its media ownership rules every four years and to eliminate those rules it finds no longer serve the “public interest, convenience and necessity.”
In August 2016, the FCC adopted a Second Report and Order (the “2016 Ownership Order”) concluding the agency’s 2010 and 2014 quadrennial reviews. The 2016 Ownership Order (1) retained the then-existing local television ownership rule and radio/television cross-ownership rule with minor technical modifications, (2) extended the ban on common ownership of two top-four television stations in a market to network affiliation swaps, (3) retained the then-existing ban on newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership in local markets while considering waivers and providing an exception for failed or failing entities, (4) retained the dual network rule, (5) made JSA relationships attributable interests and (6) defined a category of sharing agreements designated as SSAs between stations and required public disclosure of those SSAs (while not considering them attributable).
The 2016 Ownership Order reinstated a rule that attributed another in-market station toward the local television ownership limits when one station owner sells more than 15% of the second station’s weekly advertising inventory under a JSA (this rule had been previously adopted in 2014 but was vacated by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (the “Third Circuit”)). Parties to JSAs entered into prior to March 31, 2014 were permitted to continue to operate under those JSAs until September 30, 2025.
Nexstar and other parties filed petitions seeking reconsideration of various aspects of the 2016 Ownership Order. On November 16, 2017, the FCC adopted an order (the “Reconsideration Order”) addressing the petitions for reconsideration. The Reconsideration Order (1) eliminated the rules prohibiting newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership and limiting television/radio cross-ownership, (2) eliminated the requirement that eight or more independently-owned television stations remain in a local market for common ownership of two television stations in that market to be permissible, (3) retained the general prohibition on common ownership of two “top four” stations in a local market but provided for case-by-case review, (4) eliminated the television JSA attribution rule, and (5) retained the SSA definition and disclosure requirement for television stations. These rule modifications took effect on February 7, 2018, when the Third Circuit denied a mandamus petition which had sought to stay their effectiveness. The Reconsideration Order remains subject to appeals before the Third Circuit.
In December 2018, the FCC initiated its 2018 quadrennial review with the issuance of a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. Among other things, the FCC seeks comment on all aspects of the local television ownership rule’s implementation and whether the current version of the rule remains necessary in the public interest. Comments and reply comments in the 2018 quadrennial review are due in the first and second quarters of 2019.
F-47
The FCC’s media ownership rules limit the percentage of U.S. television households which a party may reach through its attributable interests in television stations to
Spectrum
The FCC is in the process of repurposing a portion of the broadcast television spectrum for wireless broadband use. Pursuant to federal legislation enacted in 2012, the FCC conducted an incentive auction for the purpose of making additional spectrum available to meet future wireless broadband needs. Under the auction statute and rules, certain television broadcasters accepted bids from the FCC to voluntarily relinquish all or part of their spectrum in exchange for consideration, and certain wireless broadband providers and other entities submitted successful bids to acquire the relinquished television spectrum. Over the next several years, television stations that are not relinquishing their spectrum are being “repacked” into the frequency band still remaining for television broadcast use.
The incentive auction commenced on March 29, 2016 and officially concluded on April 13, 2017.
The majority of the Company’s television stations did not accept bids to relinquish their television channels. Of those stations,
The reallocation of television spectrum to broadband use may be to the detriment of the Company’s investment in digital facilities, could require substantial additional investment to continue current operations, and may require viewers to invest in additional equipment or subscription services to continue receiving broadcast television signals. The Company cannot predict the impact of the incentive auction and subsequent repacking on its business.
F-48
Exclusivity/Retransmission Consent
On March 3, 2011, the FCC initiated a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking which among other things asked for comment on eliminating the network non-duplication and syndicated exclusivity protection rules, which may permit MVPDs to import out-of-market television stations in certain circumstances.
In March 2014, the FCC adopted a further notice of proposed rulemaking which sought additional comment on the elimination or modification of the network non-duplication and syndicated exclusivity rules. The FCC’s possible elimination or modification of the network non-duplication and syndicated exclusivity protection rules may affect the Company’s ability to sustain its current level of retransmission consent revenues or grow such revenues in the future and could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company cannot predict the resolution of the FCC’s network non-duplication and syndicated exclusivity proposals, or the impact of these proposals.
On December 5, 2014, federal legislation directed the FCC to commence a rulemaking to “review its totality of the circumstances test for good faith [retransmission consent] negotiations.” The FCC commenced this proceeding in September 2015 and comments and reply comments were submitted. In July 2016, the then-Chairman of the FCC publicly announced that the agency would not adopt additional rules in this proceeding. However, the proceeding remains open.
Further, certain online video distributors and other OTTDs have begun streaming broadcast programming over the Internet. In June 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court held that an OTTD’s retransmissions of broadcast television signals without the consent of the broadcast station violate copyright holders’ exclusive right to perform their works publicly as provided under the Copyright Act. In December 2014, the FCC issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposing to interpret the term “MVPD” to encompass OTTDs that make available for purchase multiple streams of video programming distributed at a prescheduled time and seeking comment on the effects of applying MVPD rules to such OTTDs. Comments and reply comments were filed in 2015. Although the FCC has not classified OTTDs as MVPDs to date, several OTTDs have signed agreements for retransmission of local stations within their markets and others are actively seeking to negotiate such agreements.
13. Commitments and Contingencies
Merger Agreement with Tribune
On
Broadcast Rights Commitments
Broadcast rights acquired for cash under license agreements are recorded as an asset and a corresponding liability at the inception of the license period.
2019 |
|
$ |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
2022 |
|
|
|
|
2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
F-49
Operating Leases
The Company leases office space, vehicles, towers, antenna sites, studio and other operating equipment under noncancelable operating lease arrangements expiring through June 2114. Rent expense recorded in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for such leases was $
2019 |
|
$ |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
2022 |
|
|
|
|
2023 |
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Capital Leases
The Company leases certain equipment, tower facilities and other real estate properties under noncancelable lease arrangements. These contracts were accounted for as capital leases and included in property and equipment (See Note 4).
2019 |
|
$ |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
2022 |
|
|
|
|
2023 |
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Amount representing interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Guarantee of Mission, Marshall and Shield Debt
Nexstar and its subsidiaries guarantee full payment of all obligations incurred under the Mission, Marshall and Shield senior secured credit facilities. In the event that Mission, Marshall or Shield are unable to repay amounts due, Nexstar will be obligated to repay such amounts. The maximum potential amount of future payments that Nexstar would be required to make under these guarantees would be generally limited to the borrowings outstanding. As of December 31, 2018, Mission had a maximum commitment of $
Indemnification Obligations
In connection with certain agreements that the Company enters into in the normal course of its business, including local service agreements, business acquisitions and borrowing arrangements, the Company enters into contractual arrangements under which the Company agrees to indemnify the third party to such arrangement from losses, claims and damages incurred by the indemnified party for certain events as defined within the particular contract. Such indemnification obligations may not be subject to maximum loss clauses and the maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification arrangements may be unlimited. Historically, payments made related to these indemnifications have been insignificant and the Company has not incurred significant costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification agreements.
F-50
Collective Bargaining Agreements
As of December 31, 2018, certain technical, production and news employees at
Litigation
From time to time, the Company is involved with claims that arise out of the normal course of its business. In the opinion of management, any resulting liability with respect to these claims would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
On March 16, 2018, a group of companies including Nexstar (the “Defendants”) received a Civil Investigative Demand from the Antitrust Division of the DOJ regarding an investigation into the exchange of certain information related to the pacing of sales related to the same period in the prior year among broadcast stations in some DMAs in alleged violation of federal antitrust law. Other Defendants entered into a proposed consent decree with the DOJ on November 6, 2018. Without admitting any wrongdoing, Nexstar agreed to settle the matter with the DOJ on December 5, 2018. The DOJ filed an amended complaint adding Nexstar to the consent decree on December 13, 2018. The consent decree, which settles any claims by the government of alleged violations of federal antitrust laws in connection with the alleged information sharing, does not include any financial penalty. Pursuant to the consent decree, we have agreed not to exchange certain non-public information with other stations operating in the same DMA except in certain cases, to implement certain antitrust compliance measures and to monitor and report on compliance with the consent decree.
On
On October 9, 2018, these cases were consolidated in a multi-district litigation in the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois captioned In Re: Local TV Advertising Antitrust Litigation, No. 1:18-cv-06785 (“MDL Litigation”). On January 23, 2019, the Court in the MDL Litigation appointed plaintiffs’ lead and liaison counsel. The MDL Litigation is ongoing. Nexstar denies the allegations against it and will defend its advertising practices as necessary.
14. Segment Data
The Company evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on net revenue and operating income. The Company’s broadcast segment includes television stations and related community focused websites that Nexstar owns, operates, programs or provides sales and other services to in various markets across the United States. The other activities of the Company include corporate functions, digital businesses and eliminations.
Segment financial information is included in the following tables for the periods presented (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
|
Broadcast |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|||
Net revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-51
Year Ended December 31, 2017 |
|
Broadcast |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|||
Net revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2016 |
|
Broadcast |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|||
Net revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the disaggregation of the Company’s revenue under ASC 606 for the periods presented. Comparative 2017 and 2016 revenues are presented in accordance with the Company’s historical accounting standard prior to the adoption of ASC 606 (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
|
Broadcast |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|||
Local |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
National |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Political |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Retransmission compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Digital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017 |
|
Broadcast |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|||
Local |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
National |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Political |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retransmission compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and barter revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2016 |
|
Broadcast |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|||
Local |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
National |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Political |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retransmission compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and barter revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
The Company is a television broadcasting and digital media company focused on the acquisition, development and operation of television stations and interactive community websites and digital media services in medium-sized markets in the United States.
Advertising revenue (local, national, political and digital) is positively affected by national and regional political campaigns, and certain events such as the Olympic Games or the Super Bowl. Company stations’ advertising revenue is generally highest in the second and fourth quarters of each year, due in part to increases in consumer advertising in the spring and retail advertising in the period leading up to, and including, the holiday season. In addition, advertising revenue is generally higher during even-numbered years when congressional and presidential elections occur, and advertising is aired during the Olympic Games.
The Company receives compensation from MVPDs and OTTDs in return for the consent to the retransmission of the signals of its television stations. Retransmission compensation is recognized at the point in time the broadcast signal is delivered to the distributors and is based on a price per subscriber.
F-52
Beginning in 2018, the Company no longer recognizes barter revenue (and the related barter expense) resulting from the exchange of advertising time for certain program material. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recognized barter revenue (and barter expense) of $
15. Condensed Consolidating Financial Information
The following condensed consolidating financial information presents the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company, including its wholly-owned subsidiaries and its consolidated VIEs. This information is presented in lieu of separate financial statements and other related disclosures pursuant to Regulation S-X Rule 3-10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, “Financial Statements of Guarantors and Issuers of Guaranteed Securities Registered or Being Registered.”
The Nexstar column presents the parent company’s financial information, excluding consolidating entities. The Nexstar Broadcasting column presents the financial information of Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. (“Nexstar Broadcasting”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nexstar and issuer of the
Nexstar Broadcasting’s outstanding
Nexstar Broadcasting’s outstanding 5.625% Notes and 6.125% Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, by Nexstar and Mission, subject to certain customary release provisions. These notes are not guaranteed by any other entities.
The indentures governing the 5.625% Notes and the 6.125% Notes are not registered but require consolidating information that presents the guarantor information.
As discussed in Note 2, the Company adopted ASU No. 2016-15 on a retrospective basis which reclassified the cash flow classification of certain payments for contingent consideration related to an acquisition in 2017 from financing activities to operating activities and payments received for the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance claims from operating activities to investing activities. The Company also adopted ASU No. 2016-18 on a retrospective basis which impacted the cash flow treatment of transfers between cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash in 2017. Further, the Company adopted ASU No. 2017-07 on a retrospective basis which requires the presentation of the net periodic benefit costs, other than the current service costs, in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside the subtotal of income from operations. The effects of these adoptions were reflected in the accompanying Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2017 and the Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
F-53
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 2018
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nexstar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|||
|
|
Nexstar |
|
|
Broadcasting |
|
|
Mission |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Company |
|
||||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts due from consolidated entities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Spectrum asset |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investments in subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Amounts due from consolidated entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
FCC licenses |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of debt |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts due to consolidated entities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Liability to surrender spectrum asset |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Debt |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts due to consolidated entities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total Nexstar Media Group, Inc. stockholders' equity (deficit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated variable interest entities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
F-54
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 2017
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nexstar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|||
|
|
Nexstar |
|
|
Broadcasting |
|
|
Mission |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Company |
|
||||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts due from consolidated entities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Spectrum asset |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investments in subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Amounts due from consolidated entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
FCC licenses |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of debt |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Liability to surrender spectrum asset |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts due to consolidated entities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Debt |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts due to consolidated entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total Nexstar Media Group, Inc. stockholders' equity (deficit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated variable interest entities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
F-55
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Year Ended December 31, 2018
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nexstar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|||
|
|
Nexstar |
|
|
Broadcasting |
|
|
Mission |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Company |
|
||||||
Net broadcast revenue (including trade) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Revenue between consolidated entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Net revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses (income): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Local service agreement fees between consolidated entities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Amortization of broadcast rights |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement from the FCC related to station repack |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Goodwill and intangible assets impairment |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from operations |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Pension and other postretirement plans credit, net |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Equity in income of subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Nexstar |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrecognized amounts included in pension and other postretirement benefit obligations, net of tax benefit of $ |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Nexstar |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
F-56
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Year Ended December 31, 2017
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nexstar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|||
|
|
Nexstar |
|
|
Broadcasting |
|
|
Mission |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Company |
|
||||||
Net broadcast revenue (including trade and barter) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Revenue between consolidated entities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Net revenue |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses (income): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Local service agreement fees between consolidated entities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Amortization of broadcast rights |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposal of stations, net |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Total operating expenses |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Pension and other postretirement plans credit, net |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Equity in income of subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Net income (loss) attributable to Nexstar |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrecognized amounts included in pension and other postretirement benefit obligations, net of tax of $ |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Nexstar |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
F-57
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Year Ended December 31, 2016
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nexstar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|||
|
|
Nexstar |
|
|
Broadcasting |
|
|
Mission |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Company |
|
||||||
Net broadcast revenue (including trade and barter) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Revenue between consolidated entities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Net revenue |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Local service agreement fees between consolidated entities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Amortization of broadcast rights |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Other expenses |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Equity in income of subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Net income (loss) attributable to Nexstar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Nexstar |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
F-58
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31, 2018
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nexstar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|||
|
|
Nexstar |
|
|
Broadcasting |
|
|
Mission |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Company |
|
||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Spectrum repack reimbursements |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits and payments for acquisitions |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Other investing activities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Common stock dividends paid |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Inter-company payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
F-59
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31, 2017
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nexstar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|||
|
|
Nexstar |
|
|
Broadcasting |
|
|
Mission |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Company |
|
||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Deposits and payments for acquisitions |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Proceeds from sale of a station |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds received to relinquish spectrum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investing activities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Premium paid on debt extinguishment |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Payments for debt financing costs |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Purchase of noncontrolling interests |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Payments for contingent consideration |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Common stock dividends paid |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Inter-company payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
F-60
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31, 2016
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nexstar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|||
|
|
Nexstar |
|
|
Broadcasting |
|
|
Mission |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Company |
|
||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Deposits and payments for acquisitions |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Other investing activities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Common stock dividends paid |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Payments for debt financing costs |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Inter-company payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
F-61
16. Unaudited Quarterly Data
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2018 |
|
||||
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
|||||||||||||
Net revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Nexstar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||||
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
|||||||||||||
Net revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Nexstar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As discussed in Note 2, the Company adopted ASU No. 2017-07 on a retrospective basis which requires the presentation of the net periodic benefit costs, other than the current service costs, in the income statement separately and outside the subtotal of income from operations. The effects of this adoption in fiscal year 2017 are reflected in the unaudited quarterly data table above.
17. Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Rollforward
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Charged to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|||
|
|
Beginning |
|
|
Costs and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of |
|
|||
|
|
of Period |
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
Deductions(1) |
|
|
Period |
|
||||
Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
18. Subsequent Events
On
On January 28, 2019, Nexstar completed the acquisition of KHII and paid the remaining purchase price of $
F-62