e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
|
|
For the Transition Period From To |
Commission file number 1-14122
D.R. Horton, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
75-2386963 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
301 Commerce Street,
Suite 500, Fort Worth, Texas
|
|
76102 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
|
|
|
(817) 390-8200 |
(Registrants telephone number, including area code) |
|
Not Applicable |
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
Common stock, $.01 par value 318,315,144 shares as of July 28, 2010
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
-2-
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Adjusted-Note A) |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
Homebuilding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,357.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,922.8 |
|
Marketable securities, available-for-sale |
|
|
298.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
58.8 |
|
|
|
55.2 |
|
Inventories: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction in progress and finished homes |
|
|
1,416.8 |
|
|
|
1,446.6 |
|
Residential land and lots developed and under development |
|
|
1,572.9 |
|
|
|
1,643.3 |
|
Land held for development |
|
|
567.7 |
|
|
|
562.5 |
|
Land inventory not owned |
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,565.0 |
|
|
|
3,666.7 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
32.6 |
|
|
|
293.1 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net of valuation allowance of $879.2 million
and $1,073.9 million at June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
61.3 |
|
|
|
57.8 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
417.8 |
|
|
|
433.0 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,806.7 |
|
|
|
6,444.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
35.4 |
|
|
|
34.5 |
|
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
316.1 |
|
|
|
220.8 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
53.2 |
|
|
|
57.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404.7 |
|
|
|
312.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
6,211.4 |
|
|
$ |
6,756.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
Homebuilding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
199.8 |
|
|
$ |
216.8 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
950.1 |
|
|
|
932.0 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
2,214.7 |
|
|
|
3,076.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,364.6 |
|
|
|
4,225.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
57.5 |
|
|
|
62.1 |
|
Mortgage repurchase facility |
|
|
152.5 |
|
|
|
68.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210.0 |
|
|
|
130.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
3,574.6 |
|
|
|
4,356.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note M) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY
|
|
Preferred stock, $.10 par value, 30,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, 1,000,000,000 shares authorized, 321,905,371
shares issued and 318,250,138 shares outstanding at June 30, 2010 and
321,136,119 shares issued and 317,480,886 shares outstanding at September 30,
2009 |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,888.1 |
|
|
|
1,871.1 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
831.3 |
|
|
|
613.2 |
|
Treasury stock, 3,655,233 shares at June 30, 2010
and September 30, 2009, at cost |
|
|
(95.7 |
) |
|
|
(95.7 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,627.0 |
|
|
|
2,391.8 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
2,636.8 |
|
|
|
2,400.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
6,211.4 |
|
|
$ |
6,756.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
-3-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Adjusted-Note A) |
|
|
|
|
|
(Adjusted-Note A) |
|
|
(In millions, except per share data) |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Homebuilding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home sales |
|
$ |
1,378.2 |
|
|
$ |
896.6 |
|
|
$ |
3,381.1 |
|
|
$ |
2,553.1 |
|
Land/lot sales |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,378.3 |
|
|
|
914.1 |
|
|
|
3,384.0 |
|
|
|
2,589.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home sales |
|
|
1,141.1 |
|
|
|
795.0 |
|
|
|
2,793.5 |
|
|
|
2,211.5 |
|
Land/lot sales |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
32.6 |
|
Inventory impairments and land option cost
write-offs |
|
|
30.3 |
|
|
|
110.8 |
|
|
|
33.9 |
|
|
|
215.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,171.5 |
|
|
|
922.5 |
|
|
|
2,829.6 |
|
|
|
2,459.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home sales |
|
|
237.1 |
|
|
|
101.6 |
|
|
|
587.6 |
|
|
|
341.6 |
|
Land/lot sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Inventory impairments and land option cost
write-offs |
|
|
(30.3 |
) |
|
|
(110.8 |
) |
|
|
(33.9 |
) |
|
|
(215.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206.8 |
|
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
|
|
554.4 |
|
|
|
130.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
|
143.2 |
|
|
|
134.3 |
|
|
|
400.3 |
|
|
|
388.2 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
69.3 |
|
|
|
70.4 |
|
Loss (gain) on early retirement of debt, net |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
Other (income) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.4 |
|
|
|
(166.2 |
) |
|
|
84.6 |
|
|
|
(315.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues, net of recourse and reinsurance expense |
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
67.7 |
|
|
|
39.1 |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
57.2 |
|
|
|
58.5 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Interest and other (income) |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
(12.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
46.3 |
|
|
|
(163.4 |
) |
|
|
101.2 |
|
|
|
(327.7 |
) |
Benefit from income taxes |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
(19.6 |
) |
|
|
(152.7 |
) |
|
|
(12.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
50.5 |
|
|
$ |
(143.8 |
) |
|
$ |
253.9 |
|
|
$ |
(314.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
(0.45 |
) |
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
(0.99 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share
assuming dilution |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
(0.45 |
) |
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
(0.99 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.0375 |
|
|
$ |
0.0375 |
|
|
$ |
0.1125 |
|
|
$ |
0.1125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
-4-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Adjusted-Note A) |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
253.9 |
|
|
$ |
(314.9 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
|
Amortization of discounts and fees |
|
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
Stock option compensation expense |
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
Income tax benefit from stock option exercises |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
48.1 |
|
Loss (gain) on early retirement of debt, net |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
Inventory impairments and land option cost write-offs |
|
|
33.9 |
|
|
|
215.2 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in construction in progress and finished homes |
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
230.6 |
|
Decrease in residential land and lots developed, under development,
and held for development |
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
325.3 |
|
Decrease in other assets |
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
47.1 |
|
Decrease in income taxes receivable |
|
|
260.5 |
|
|
|
551.3 |
|
(Increase) decrease in mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
(95.3 |
) |
|
|
129.4 |
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
(162.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
587.1 |
|
|
|
1,102.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(15.6 |
) |
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
Purchases of marketable securities, available-for-sale |
|
|
(299.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Increase in restricted cash |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
(60.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(318.6 |
) |
|
|
(66.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from notes payable |
|
|
83.8 |
|
|
|
487.5 |
|
Repayment of notes payable |
|
|
(888.8 |
) |
|
|
(875.0 |
) |
Proceeds from stock associated with certain employee benefit plans |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Income tax benefit from stock option exercises |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(35.8 |
) |
|
|
(35.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(833.3 |
) |
|
|
(420.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(564.8 |
) |
|
|
615.0 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
1,957.3 |
|
|
|
1,387.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
1,392.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,002.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
-5-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
June 30, 2010
NOTE A BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited, consolidated financial statements include the accounts of D.R.
Horton, Inc. and all of its wholly-owned, majority-owned and controlled subsidiaries (which are
referred to as the Company, unless the context otherwise requires), as well as certain variable
interest entities of which the Company is determined to be the primary beneficiary. All significant
intercompany accounts, transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. The
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and
Article 10 of Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal,
recurring accruals and the asset impairment charges, loss reserves and deferred tax asset valuation
allowance discussed below) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. These
financial statements do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete
financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements
and accompanying notes for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 included in the Companys
current report on Form 8-K dated February 8, 2010, which updated the Companys annual report on
Form 10-K.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Reclassifications/Revisions
Certain reclassifications have been made in the prior years financial statements to conform
to classifications used in the current year. In accordance with the authoritative guidance issued
by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) for noncontrolling interests which was adopted
at the beginning of fiscal 2010, the balance sheet at September 30, 2009 has been revised to
present minority interests (now referred to as noncontrolling interests) as a component of equity
rather than as a liability. Also, the balance sheet at September 30, 2009, the statements of
operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009 and the statement of cash flows for
the nine months ended June 30, 2009 reflect the change in accounting for convertible debt as
described below under Adoption of New Accounting Principle. Additionally, the statement of cash
flows for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 has been revised to reflect the reclassification of
insurance receivables from a component of accrued expenses and other liabilities to other assets.
Adoption of New Accounting Principle
As described in the Companys current report on Form 8-K dated February 8, 2010, on October 1,
2009, the Company adopted and applied retrospectively the FASBs authoritative guidance for
accounting for debt with conversion options, which specifies that issuers of such instruments
separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner that will reflect the
entitys nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods.
Early adoption of this authoritative guidance was not permitted. As a result, the prior year
consolidated financial statements have been retrospectively adjusted for the effects of this change
in accounting for the Companys 2% convertible senior notes issued in May 2009. The debt component
of the convertible senior notes was recorded at its fair value on the date of issuance of the
notes, assuming no conversion features. The remaining value of the equity component of the
convertible senior notes was recorded as a reduction in the carrying value of the notes and an
increase in additional paid-in capital. The reduction in the carrying value of the notes and the
fees related to the notes will be amortized as interest incurred and expensed or capitalized to
inventory over the remaining life of the notes. The additional interest expense recognized in
fiscal 2009 due to the restatement was $4.5 million, of which $1.5 million was recognized during
the three months ended June 30, 2009. The recognition of this additional interest expense increased
the Companys diluted net loss per share by $0.01 for the year ended September 30, 2009.
-6-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
June 30, 2010
Business
The Company is a national homebuilder that is engaged in the construction and sale of
single-family housing in 72 markets and 26 states in the United States at June 30, 2010. The
Company designs, builds and sells single-family detached homes on lots it develops and on finished
lots purchased ready for home construction. To a lesser extent, the Company also builds and sells
attached homes, such as town homes, duplexes, triplexes and condominiums (including some mid-rise
buildings), which share common walls and roofs. Periodically, the Company sells land and lots. The
Company also provides title agency and mortgage financing services, principally to its homebuyers.
The Company generally does not retain or service the mortgages that it originates; rather, it seeks
to sell the mortgages and related servicing rights to third-party purchasers.
Seasonality
Historically, the homebuilding industry has experienced seasonal fluctuations; therefore, the
operating results for the three and nine-month periods ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010 or
subsequent periods.
NOTE B COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
The following table provides a reconciliation of net income (loss) reported in the
consolidated statements of operations to comprehensive income (loss) for the three and nine-month
periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) (1) |
|
$ |
50.5 |
|
|
$ |
(143.8 |
) |
|
$ |
253.9 |
|
|
$ |
(314.9 |
) |
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain related
to available-for-sale
securities (see Note C) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
50.7 |
|
|
$ |
(143.8 |
) |
|
$ |
254.0 |
|
|
$ |
(314.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net loss for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009 has been
retrospectively adjusted to reflect the change in accounting for
convertible debt as described in Note A. |
NOTE C MARKETABLE SECURITIES
During the current year, the Company began to invest a portion of its cash on hand by
purchasing marketable securities with maturities in excess of three months. To be considered for
investment, securities must meet certain minimum requirements as to their credit ratings, time to
maturity and other risk-related criteria as prescribed by the Companys investment policies. The
primary objective of these investments is the preservation of capital, with the secondary
objectives of attaining higher yields than the Company earns on its cash and cash equivalents and
maintaining a high degree of liquidity.
The Companys investment portfolio at June 30, 2010 included U.S. Treasury securities,
government agency securities, foreign government securities, corporate debt securities, and
certificates of deposit. These investments are held in the custody of a single financial
institution. The Company considers its investment portfolio to be available-for-sale. Accordingly,
these investments are recorded at fair value. At the end of a reporting period, unrealized gains
and losses on these investments, net of tax, are recorded directly to accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) on the consolidated balance sheet. The effect of these investments on
other comprehensive income (loss) for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 is
presented in Note B. There were no sales of securities from
-7-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
June 30, 2010
inception of the program through June 30, 2010, and therefore, there were no realized gains or
losses related to these investments during the period.
The amortized cost, unrealized gains and losses and fair values of available-for-sale
investments as of June 30, 2010, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Type of security: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
Obligations of U.S. government agencies |
|
|
131.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131.1 |
|
Corporate debt securities issued under the
FDIC Temporary
Liquidity Guarantee Program |
|
|
106.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106.0 |
|
Domestic corporate debt securities |
|
|
31.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
Foreign government securities |
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities |
|
|
288.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
288.2 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total marketable securities, available-for-sale |
|
$ |
298.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
298.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of the $298.2 million in marketable securities, $269.6 million mature in the next twelve
months and $28.6 million mature in one to two years.
NOTE D INVENTORY IMPAIRMENTS AND LAND OPTION COST WRITE-OFFS
At June 30, 2010, when the Company performed its quarterly inventory impairment analysis, the
assumptions utilized reflected the Companys expectation of continued challenging conditions and
uncertainties in the homebuilding industry and in its markets. The impairment evaluation indicated
communities with a combined carrying value of $435.7 million as of June 30, 2010 had indicators of
potential impairment, and these communities were evaluated for impairment. The analysis of the
large majority of these communities assumed that sales prices in future periods will be equal to or
lower than current sales order prices in each community, or in comparable communities, in order to
generate an acceptable absorption rate. For a minority of communities that the Company does not
intend to develop or operate in current market conditions, slight increases over current sales
prices were assumed. While it is difficult to determine a timeframe for a given community in the
current market conditions, the remaining lives of these communities were estimated to be in a range
from six months to in excess of ten years. In performing this analysis, the Company utilized a
range of discount rates for communities of 14% to 20%, which is consistent with the rates used in
fiscal 2009. Through this evaluation process, it was determined that communities with a carrying
value of $86.8 million as of June 30, 2010 were impaired. As a result, during the three months
ended June 30, 2010, impairment charges of $29.1 million were recorded to reduce the carrying value
of the impaired communities to their estimated fair value, as compared to $102.9 million in the
same period of the prior year. During the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, impairment
charges totaled $33.2 million and $203.0 million, respectively. In the three months ended June 30,
2010, approximately 93% of the impairment charges were recorded to residential land and lots and
land held for development, and approximately 7% of the charges were recorded to construction in
progress and finished homes inventory, compared to 89% and 11%, respectively, in the same period of
2009. In the nine months ended June 30, 2010, approximately 91% of the impairment charges were
recorded to residential land and lots and land held for development, and approximately 9% of the
charges were recorded to construction in progress and finished homes inventory, compared to 79% and
21%, respectively, in the same period of 2009.
-8-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
June 30, 2010
The Companys estimate of undiscounted cash flows from communities analyzed may change and
could result in a future need to record impairment charges to adjust the carrying value of these
assets to their estimated fair value. There are several factors which could lead to changes in the
estimates of undiscounted future cash flows for a given community. The most significant of these
include pricing and incentive levels actually realized by the community, the rate at which the
homes are sold and the costs incurred to construct the homes. The pricing and incentive levels are
often inter-related with sales pace within a community such that a price reduction can be expected
to increase the sales pace. Further, both of these factors are heavily influenced by the
competitive pressures facing a given community from both new homes and existing homes, some of
which may result from foreclosures. If conditions in the broader economy, homebuilding industry or
specific markets in which the Company operates worsen, and as the Company re-evaluates specific
community pricing and incentives, construction and development plans, and its overall land sale
strategies, it may be required to evaluate additional communities or re-evaluate previously
impaired communities for potential impairment. These evaluations may result in additional
impairment charges.
At June 30, 2010, the Company had $4.4 million of land held for sale, consisting of land held
for development and land under development that met the criteria of land held for sale.
During the three-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company wrote off $1.2
million and $7.9 million, respectively, of earnest money deposits and pre-acquisition costs related
to land option contracts which are not expected to be acquired. During the nine-month periods ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company wrote off $0.7 million and $12.2 million, respectively, of such
deposits and costs.
NOTE E LAND INVENTORY NOT OWNED
In the ordinary course of its homebuilding business, the Company enters into land and lot
option purchase contracts to procure land or lots for the construction of homes. Under these
contracts, the Company will fund a stated deposit in consideration for the right, but not the
obligation, to purchase land or lots at a future point in time with predetermined terms. Under the
terms of the option purchase contracts, many of the option deposits are not refundable at the
Companys discretion.
Certain option purchase contracts result in the creation of a variable interest in the entity
holding the land parcel under option. The Company evaluates those land and lot option purchase
contracts with variable interest entities to determine whether the Company is the primary
beneficiary based upon analysis of the variability of the expected gains and losses of the entity.
The expected gains and losses are primarily determined by the amount of deposit required by the
contract, the time period or term of the contract, and by analyzing the volatility in home sales
prices as well as development and entitlement risk in each specific market. Based on this
evaluation, if the Company is the primary beneficiary of an entity with which the Company has
entered into a land or lot option purchase contract, the variable interest entity is consolidated.
The consolidation of variable interest entities added $7.6 million in land inventory not owned
and noncontrolling interests related to entities not owned to the Companys consolidated balance
sheet at June 30, 2010. The Companys obligations related to these land or lot option contracts are
guaranteed by deposits, including cash, promissory notes and surety bonds, totaling $0.6 million as
of June 30, 2010. Creditors, if any, of these variable interest entities have no recourse against
the Company.
For the variable interest entities which are unconsolidated because the Company is not subject
to a majority of the risk of loss or entitled to receive a majority of the entities residual
returns, the maximum exposure to loss is generally limited to the amounts of the Companys option
deposits. At June 30, 2010, the amount of option deposits related to these contracts totaled $7.2
million and is included in homebuilding other assets on the Companys consolidated balance sheet.
-9-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
June 30, 2010
NOTE F NOTES PAYABLE
The Companys notes payable at their principal amounts, net of any unamortized discounts,
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Homebuilding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.875% senior notes due 2010, net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
130.8 |
|
9.75% senior notes due 2010 |
|
|
51.9 |
|
|
|
70.5 |
|
9.75% senior subordinated notes due 2010, net |
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
6% senior notes due 2011, net |
|
|
79.5 |
|
|
|
212.8 |
|
7.875% senior notes due 2011, net |
|
|
125.5 |
|
|
|
163.3 |
|
5.375% senior notes due 2012 |
|
|
146.6 |
|
|
|
242.1 |
|
6.875% senior notes due 2013 |
|
|
174.3 |
|
|
|
199.5 |
|
5.875% senior notes due 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
96.0 |
|
6.125% senior notes due 2014, net |
|
|
146.0 |
|
|
|
198.5 |
|
2% convertible senior notes due 2014, net (1) |
|
|
385.7 |
|
|
|
368.0 |
|
5.625% senior notes due 2014, net |
|
|
147.1 |
|
|
|
248.8 |
|
5.25% senior notes due 2015, net |
|
|
245.7 |
|
|
|
298.6 |
|
5.625% senior notes due 2016, net |
|
|
225.5 |
|
|
|
298.3 |
|
6.5% senior notes due 2016, net |
|
|
437.1 |
|
|
|
497.0 |
|
Other secured |
|
|
38.5 |
|
|
|
37.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,214.7 |
|
|
$ |
3,076.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage repurchase facility, maturing 2011 |
|
$ |
152.5 |
|
|
$ |
68.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The balance of the 2% convertible senior notes at September 30, 2009
has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect the change in accounting
for convertible debt as described in Note A. |
Homebuilding:
In April 2010, the Board of Directors authorized the early repurchase of up to $500 million of
the Companys debt securities, effective from April 29, 2010 to November 30, 2010. At June 30,
2010, $161.3 million of the authorization was remaining.
On January 15, 2010, the Company repaid the remaining $130.9 million principal amount of its
4.875% senior notes which were due on that date. On February 24, 2010, the Company redeemed the
remaining $95.0 million principal amount of its 5.875% senior notes due 2013.
-10-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
June 30, 2010
Following is a summary of the redemption and repurchase activity for the three and nine months
ended June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Amount |
|
|
Three Months |
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
(In millions) |
Maturities / Early Redemptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.875% senior notes redeemed upon maturity in January 2010 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
130.9 |
|
5.875% senior notes due 2013 redeemed in February 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
95.0 |
|
Repurchases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.75% senior notes due 2010 |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
9.75% senior subordinated notes due 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
6% senior notes due 2011 |
|
|
125.0 |
|
|
|
133.4 |
|
7.875% senior notes due 2011 |
|
|
28.9 |
|
|
|
37.9 |
|
5.375% senior notes due 2012 |
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
95.5 |
|
6.875% senior notes due 2013 |
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
|
25.2 |
|
5.875% senior notes due 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
6.125% senior notes due 2014 |
|
|
46.9 |
|
|
|
53.1 |
|
5.625% senior notes due 2014 |
|
|
48.4 |
|
|
|
102.3 |
|
5.25% senior notes due 2015 |
|
|
22.9 |
|
|
|
53.3 |
|
5.625% senior notes due 2016 |
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
73.4 |
|
6.5% senior notes due 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
345.2 |
|
|
$ |
883.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These senior notes were redeemed or repurchased for an aggregate purchase price of $352.4
million and $887.6 million, respectively, plus accrued interest, resulting in a net loss on early
retirement of debt of $8.3 million and $6.7 million for the three and nine months ended June 30,
2010, respectively. The losses include unamortized discounts and fees written off, as well as a
loss of $2.0 million in the nine-month period for the call premium related to the early redemption
of the 5.875% senior notes due 2013.
In July 2010, through unsolicited transactions, the Company repurchased $46.3 million
principal amount of its 5.25% senior notes due 2015 and $7.0 million principal amount of its 6.5%
senior notes due 2016, for an aggregate purchase price of $50.7 million, plus accrued interest.
On July 29, 2010, the Board of Directors authorized the early repurchase of up to $500 million
of the Companys debt securities effective through July 31, 2011.
The indentures governing the Companys senior notes and senior subordinated notes impose
restrictions on the creation of secured debt and liens. At June 30, 2010, the Company was in
compliance with all of the limitations and restrictions that form a part of the public debt
obligations.
Financial Services:
The Companys mortgage subsidiary, DHI Mortgage, entered into a mortgage sale and repurchase
agreement (the mortgage repurchase facility) on March 28, 2008. The mortgage repurchase facility,
which is accounted for as a secured financing, provides financing and liquidity to DHI Mortgage by
facilitating purchase transactions in which DHI Mortgage transfers eligible loans to the
counterparties against the transfer of funds by the counterparties, thereby becoming purchased
loans. DHI Mortgage then has the right and obligation to repurchase the purchased loans upon their
sale to third-party purchasers in the secondary market or within specified time frames from 45 to 120 days in accordance with the terms of the mortgage repurchase facility. In March 2010,
through an amendment to
-11-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
June 30, 2010
the repurchase agreement, the capacity of the facility was increased from
$100 million to $150 million, with a provision allowing an increase in the capacity to $175 million
during the last five business days of any fiscal quarter and the first seven business days of the
following fiscal quarter. Additionally, the amendment extended the maturity date of the facility to
March 4, 2011. Effective July 30, 2010, through an amendment to the repurchase agreement, the
capacity of the facility was reduced from $150 million to $100 million, with a provision allowing
an increase in the capacity to $125 million during the last five business days of any fiscal
quarter and the first seven business days of the following fiscal quarter.
As of June 30, 2010, $288.9 million of mortgage loans held for sale were pledged under the
repurchase agreement. These mortgage loans had a collateral value of $268.8 million. DHI Mortgage
has the option to fund a portion of its repurchase obligations in advance. As a result of advance
paydowns totaling $116.3 million, DHI Mortgage had an obligation of $152.5 million outstanding
under the mortgage repurchase facility at June 30, 2010 at a 3.8% interest rate.
The mortgage repurchase facility is not guaranteed by either D.R. Horton, Inc. or any of the
subsidiaries that guarantee the Companys homebuilding debt. The facility contains financial
covenants as to the mortgage subsidiarys minimum required tangible net worth, its maximum
allowable ratio of debt to tangible net worth and its minimum required liquidity. At June 30, 2010,
the mortgage subsidiary was in compliance with all of the conditions and covenants of the mortgage
repurchase facility.
NOTE G HOMEBUILDING INTEREST
The Company capitalizes homebuilding interest costs to inventory during active development and
construction. Capitalized interest is charged to cost of sales as the related inventory is
delivered to the buyer. Additionally, the Company writes off a portion of the capitalized interest
related to communities for which inventory impairments are recorded. The Companys inventory under
active development and construction was lower than its debt level at June 30, 2010 and 2009.
Therefore, a portion of the interest incurred is reflected as interest expense.
The following table summarizes the Companys homebuilding interest costs incurred,
capitalized, expensed as interest expense, charged to cost of sales and written off during the
three and nine-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized interest, beginning of period (1) |
|
$ |
117.2 |
|
|
$ |
155.8 |
|
|
$ |
128.8 |
|
|
$ |
160.6 |
|
Interest incurred (1) |
|
|
41.3 |
|
|
|
45.7 |
|
|
|
136.9 |
|
|
|
152.7 |
|
Interest expensed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directly to interest expense (1) |
|
|
(19.6 |
) |
|
|
(21.8 |
) |
|
|
(69.3 |
) |
|
|
(70.4 |
) |
Amortized to cost of sales |
|
|
(38.3 |
) |
|
|
(30.3 |
) |
|
|
(95.6 |
) |
|
|
(89.1 |
) |
Written off with inventory impairments |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized interest, end of period |
|
$ |
99.7 |
|
|
$ |
146.0 |
|
|
$ |
99.7 |
|
|
$ |
146.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The activity during the three and nine-month periods ended June 30,
2009 and the beginning balance of capitalized interest for the
nine-month period ended June 30, 2010 have been retrospectively
adjusted to reflect the change in accounting for convertible debt as
described in Note A. |
-12-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
June 30, 2010
NOTE H MORTGAGE LOANS
To manage the interest rate risk inherent in its mortgage operations, the Company hedges its
risk using various derivative instruments, which include forward sales of mortgage-backed
securities (MBS), Eurodollar Futures Contracts (EDFC) and put options on both MBS and EDFC. Use of
the term hedging instruments in the following discussion refers to these securities collectively,
or in any combination. The Company does not enter into or hold derivatives for trading or
speculative purposes.
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale
Mortgage loans held for sale consist primarily of single-family residential loans
collateralized by the underlying property. Newly originated loans that have been closed but not
committed to third-party purchasers are hedged to mitigate the risk of changes in their fair value.
Hedged loans are committed to third-party purchasers typically within three days after origination.
Approximately 88% of the mortgage loans sold by DHI Mortgage during the nine months ended June 30,
2010 were sold to two major financial institutions pursuant to their loan purchase agreements with
DHI Mortgage. At June 30, 2010, mortgage loans held for sale had an aggregate fair value of $316.1
million and an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $307.9 million. During the three months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company had net gains on sales of loans of $13.9 million and
$12.2 million, respectively. During the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company had
net gains on sales of loans of $32.9 million and $15.5 million, respectively, which includes the
effect of recording recourse expense of $11.7 million and $24.2 million, respectively, as discussed
in the Other Mortgage Loans and Loss Reserves section below.
The notional amounts of the hedging instruments used to hedge mortgage loans held for sale
vary in relationship to the underlying loan amounts, depending on the movements in the value of
each hedging instrument relative to the value of the underlying mortgage loans. The fair value
change related to the hedging instruments generally offsets the fair value change in the mortgage
loans held for sale, which for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was not
significant, and is recognized in current earnings. As of June 30, 2010, the Company had $111.5
million in mortgage loans held for sale not committed to third-party purchasers and the notional
amounts of the hedging instruments related to those loans totaled $111.6 million.
Other Mortgage Loans and Loss Reserves
Generally, mortgage loans are sold with limited recourse provisions which include
industry-standard representations and warranties, primarily involving the absence of
misrepresentations by the borrower or other parties and, depending on the agreement, may include
requiring a minimum number of payments to be made by the borrower. The Company generally does not
retain any other continuing interest related to mortgage loans sold in the secondary market. Other
mortgage loans generally consist of loans repurchased due to these limited recourse obligations.
Typically, these loans are impaired and often become real estate owned through the foreclosure
process.
Based on historical performance and current housing and credit market conditions, the Company
has recorded reserves for estimated losses on other mortgage loans, real estate owned and future
loan repurchase obligations due to the limited recourse provisions, all of which are recorded as
reductions of financial services revenue. These reserves totaled $39.9 million and $43.6 million at
June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively, allocated as follows. Other mortgage loans,
subject to nonrecurring fair value measurement, totaled $45.9 million and $50.2 million at June 30,
2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively, and had corresponding loss reserves of $9.7 million and
$13.1 million, respectively. The Company has established loss reserves for real estate owned of
$2.5 million and $2.6 million at June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively. The Companys
other mortgage loans and real estate owned are included in financial services other assets in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Additional loss reserves at June 30, 2010 and September
30, 2009 included liabilities of $27.7 million and $27.9 million, respectively, for expected losses
on future loan repurchase obligations due to the limited recourse provisions.
-13-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
June 30, 2010
A subsidiary of the Company reinsured a portion of private mortgage insurance written on loans
originated by DHI Mortgage in prior years. At June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, reserves for
expected future losses under the reinsurance program totaled $11.8 million and $18.7 million,
respectively. The mortgage repurchase
and reinsurance loss reserves are included in financial services accounts payable and other
liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. It is possible that future losses may
exceed the amount of reserves and, if so, additional charges will be required.
Loan Commitments
The Company is party to interest rate lock commitments (IRLCs) which are extended to borrowers
who have applied for loan funding and meet defined credit and underwriting criteria. At June 30,
2010, IRLCs totaled $214.4 million which are accounted for as derivative instruments recorded at
fair value.
The Company manages interest rate risk related to its IRLCs through the use of best-efforts
whole loan delivery commitments and hedging instruments. These instruments are considered
derivatives in an economic hedge and are accounted for at fair value with gains and losses
recognized in current earnings. As of June 30, 2010, the Company had approximately $19.2 million of
best-efforts whole loan delivery commitments and $172.1 million of hedging instruments related to
IRLCs not yet committed to purchasers.
At June 30, 2010, the Company had $25.3 million notional amount of forward sales of MBS which
were acquired as part of a program to potentially offer homebuyers a below market interest rate on
their home financing. These hedging instruments and the related commitments are accounted for at
fair value with gains and losses recognized in current earnings. These gains and losses for the
three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were not material.
NOTE I FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company adopted the FASBs authoritative guidance for fair value measurements of financial
and non-financial instruments on October 1, 2008 and 2009, respectively. The guidance defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. Fair value is defined as the exchange (exit) price that would be received for an
asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. This
standard establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based upon the inputs to
the valuation of an asset or liability. Observable inputs are those which can be easily seen by
market participants while unobservable inputs are generally developed internally, utilizing
managements estimates and assumptions.
|
|
|
Level 1 Valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
and liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Valuation is determined from quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in
markets that are not active, or by model-based techniques in which all significant
inputs are observable in the market. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Valuation is derived from model-based techniques in which at least one
significant input is unobservable and based on the Companys own estimates about the
assumptions that market participants would use to value the asset or liability. |
When available, the Company uses quoted market prices in active markets to determine fair
value. The Company considers the principal market and nonperformance risk associated with the
Companys counterparties when determining the fair value measurements, if applicable. Fair value
measurements are used for the Companys marketable securities, mortgage loans held for sale, IRLCs
and other derivative instruments on a recurring basis, and are used for inventories and other
mortgage loans on a nonrecurring basis, when events and circumstances indicate that the carrying
value may not be recoverable.
-14-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
June 30, 2010
The Companys marketable securities consist of U.S. Treasury securities, government agency
securities, corporate debt securities, foreign government securities, and certificates of deposit.
The fair value of U.S. Treasury securities is based on quoted prices for identical assets and
therefore, they have been classified as a Level 1 valuation. Obligations of government agencies,
corporate debt securities, foreign government securities and certificates of deposit are valued
using quoted market prices of recent transactions or quoted market prices of transactions in very
similar securities and therefore, are classified as Level 2 valuations.
The value of mortgage loans held for sale includes changes in estimated fair value from the
date the loan is closed until the date the loan is sold. The fair value of mortgage loans held for
sale is generally calculated by reference to quoted prices in secondary markets for commitments to
sell mortgage loans with similar characteristics; therefore, they have been classified as a Level 2
valuation. After consideration of nonperformance risk, no additional adjustments have been made to
the fair value measurement of mortgage loans held for sale. Closed mortgage loans are typically
sold within 30 days of origination, limiting any nonperformance exposure period. In addition, the
Company actively monitors the financial strength of its counterparties and has limited the number
of counterparties utilized in loan sale transactions due to the current market volatility in the
mortgage and bank environment.
The hedging instruments utilized by the Company to manage its interest rate risk and hedge the
changes in the fair value of mortgage loans held for sale are publicly traded derivatives with fair
value measurements based on quoted market prices. Exchange-traded derivatives are considered Level
1 valuations because quoted prices for identical assets are used for fair value measurements.
Over-the-counter derivatives, such as forward sales of MBS, are classified as Level 2 valuations
because quoted prices for similar assets are used for fair value measurements. The Company
mitigates exposure to nonperformance risk associated with over-the-counter derivatives by limiting
the number of counterparties and actively monitoring their financial strength and creditworthiness
while requiring them to be well-known institutions with credit ratings equal to or better than AA-
or equivalent. Further, the Companys derivative contracts typically have short-term durations with
maturities from one to four months. Accordingly, the Companys risk of nonperformance relative to
its derivative positions is also not significant. Nonperformance risk associated with
exchange-traded derivatives is considered minimal as these items are traded on the Chicago
Mercantile Exchange. After consideration of nonperformance risk, no additional adjustments have
been made to the fair value measurement of hedging instruments.
The fair values of IRLCs are also calculated by reference to quoted prices in secondary
markets for commitments to sell mortgage loans with similar characteristics; therefore, they have
been classified as Level 2 valuations. These valuations do not contain adjustments for expirations
as any expired commitments are excluded from the fair value measurement. After consideration of
nonperformance risk, no additional adjustments have been made to the fair value measurements of
IRLCs. The Company generally only issues IRLCs for products that meet specific purchaser
guidelines. Should any purchaser become insolvent, the Company would not be required to close the
transaction based on the terms of the commitment. Since not all IRLCs will become closed loans, the
Company adjusts its fair value measurements for the estimated amount of IRLCs that will not close.
Inventory held and used is reported at the lower of carrying value or fair value on a
nonrecurring basis. The factors considered in determining fair values of the Companys communities
are described in the discussion of the Companys inventory impairment analysis (see Note D), and
are classified as Level 3 valuations. Inventory held and used measured at fair value represents
those communities for which the Company has recorded impairments during the current period.
Other mortgage loans are measured at the lower of carrying value or fair value on a
nonrecurring basis and include performing and nonperforming mortgage loans. The fair values of
other mortgage loans are determined based on the Companys assessment of the value of the
underlying collateral and are classified as Level 3 valuations.
-15-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
June 30, 2010
The following table summarizes the Companys assets and liabilities at June 30, 2010
measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Homebuilding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities, available-for-sale |
|
Marketable securities |
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
|
$ |
294.7 |
|
|
$ |
298.2 |
|
Financial Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans held for sale (a) |
|
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
316.1 |
|
|
$ |
316.1 |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments (b): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate lock commitments |
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
Forward sales of MBS |
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(5.0 |
) |
Best-efforts commitments |
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.2 |
) |
|
(a) |
|
Mortgage loans held for sale are reflected at full fair value. Interest income earned
on mortgage loans held for sale is based on contractual interest rates and included in
financial services interest and other income. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Fair value measurements of these derivatives represent changes in fair value since
inception. These changes are reflected in the balance sheet and included in financial
services revenues on the consolidated statement of operations. |
The following table summarizes the Companys assets at June 30, 2010 measured at fair value on
a nonrecurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
Location |
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
Homebuilding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory held and used (a) |
|
Inventories |
|
$ |
57.7 |
|
Financial Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other mortgage loans (a) |
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
36.2 |
|
|
(a) |
|
The fair values included in the table above represent only those assets whose carrying
values were adjusted to fair value in the current quarter. |
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents approximate their fair values due to their
short-term nature. For senior, convertible senior and senior subordinated notes, the Company
determines fair value based on quoted market prices. The aggregate fair value of these notes at
June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 was $2,269.8 million and $3,187.6 million, respectively,
compared to carrying values of $2,176.2 million and $3,039.5 million, respectively. The aggregate
fair value of the Companys senior notes includes fair values for the 2% convertible senior notes
of $507.5 million and $568.6 million at June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively,
compared to their carrying values of $385.7 million and $368.0 million, respectively. The carrying
value of the equity component of the 2% convertible senior notes was $136.7 million at June 30,
2010 and September 30, 2009. For other secured notes and balances due under the mortgage repurchase
facility, the fair values approximate their carrying amounts due to their short maturity or
floating interest rate terms, as applicable.
-16-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
June 30, 2010
NOTE J INCOME TAXES
The Companys benefit from income taxes for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 was
$4.2 million and $152.7 million, respectively, compared to a benefit from income taxes of $19.6
million and $12.8 million in the comparable periods of the prior year. The benefit from income
taxes for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 consists of a benefit of $208.0 million from a change
in federal tax law which expanded the number of years the Company can carry back net operating
losses, offset by a provision for income taxes of $3.0 million for state income taxes and an
increase for unrecognized tax benefits of $52.3 million. The Company does not have meaningful
effective tax rates for the nine-month period ended June 30, 2010 and the comparable period of the
prior year because of losses from operations before taxes in the prior year, the impact of
valuation allowances on its net deferred tax assets and the change in tax law in the current year.
On November 6, 2009, the Worker, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009 was
enacted into law and amended Section 172 of the Internal Revenue Code. This tax law change allows a
net operating loss realized in one of the Companys fiscal 2008, 2009 or 2010 years to be carried
back up to five years (previously limited to a two-year carryback). The Company elected to carry
back its fiscal 2009 net operating loss. This resulted in a benefit from income taxes of $208.0
million during the nine-month period ended June 30, 2010.
The Company had income taxes receivable of $32.6 million and $293.1 million at June 30, 2010
and September 30, 2009, respectively. During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company
received income tax refunds totaling $471.5 million which resulted from tax losses generated in
fiscal 2008 and 2009. The income taxes receivable at June 30, 2010 relates to additional federal
and state income tax refunds the Company expects to receive.
At June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, the Company had net deferred income tax assets of
$879.2 million and $1,073.9 million, respectively, offset by valuation allowances of $879.2 million
and $1,073.9 million, respectively. Tax benefits of $81.4 million for state net operating loss
carryforwards that expire (beginning at various times depending on the tax jurisdiction) from
fiscal 2013 to fiscal 2029 are included in the amounts. The Company assesses, on a quarterly basis,
the realizability of its deferred tax assets and records a valuation allowance sufficient to reduce
the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The accounting
for deferred taxes is based upon an estimate of future results. Differences between the anticipated
and actual outcomes of these future tax consequences could have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated results of operations or financial position. Changes in existing tax laws also affect
actual tax results and the valuation of deferred tax assets over time.
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits (which includes interest, penalties, and the tax
benefit relating to the deductibility of interest and state income taxes) was $76.3 million and
$24.0 million as of June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively. The increase relates
primarily to the Companys election to carryback its fiscal 2009 net operating loss to fiscal 2004
and 2005, thereby fully utilizing the net operating loss which existed at September 30, 2009. It is
reasonably possible that, within the next 12 months, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits may
decrease as much as $49.7 million as a result of a ruling request filed by the Company with the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) concerning capitalization of inventory costs. If the IRS rules
favorably on the ruling request, the Companys unrecognized tax benefits would be reduced,
resulting in a benefit from income taxes in the consolidated statement of operations. The Company
classifies interest and penalties on income taxes as income tax expense.
The Company is subject to federal income tax and to income tax in multiple states. The statute
of limitations for the Companys major tax jurisdictions remains open for examination for fiscal
years 2004 through 2010. The Company is currently being audited by various states.
-17-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
June 30, 2010
NOTE K EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the numerators and denominators used in the computation of
basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009. For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, options to purchase 9.5 million and 9.7
million shares of common stock, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted
earnings per share because the exercise price was greater than the average market price of the
common shares and, therefore, their effect would have been antidilutive. For the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2009, all outstanding stock options and convertible senior notes were
excluded from the computation of the loss per share because they were antidilutive due to the net
loss recorded during those periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) (1) |
|
$ |
50.5 |
|
|
$ |
(143.8 |
) |
|
$ |
253.9 |
|
|
$ |
(314.9 |
) |
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of
issuance costs
associated with convertible
senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for diluted earnings (loss) per share
after assumed conversions |
|
$ |
50.5 |
|
|
$ |
(143.8 |
) |
|
$ |
277.0 |
|
|
$ |
(314.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic earnings (loss) per
share
weighted average common shares |
|
|
318.2 |
|
|
|
316.9 |
|
|
|
318.0 |
|
|
|
316.8 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings (loss) per
share
adjusted weighted average common shares |
|
|
319.1 |
|
|
|
316.9 |
|
|
|
356.9 |
|
|
|
316.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Net loss for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009 has been
retrospectively adjusted to reflect the change in accounting for
convertible debt as described in Note A. |
NOTE L STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
The Company has an automatically effective universal shelf registration statement filed with
the SEC in September 2009, registering debt and equity securities that the Company may issue from
time to time in amounts to be determined.
In November 2009, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $100 million of
the Companys common stock. The authorization is effective from December 1, 2009 to November 30,
2010. All of the $100 million authorization was remaining at June 30, 2010, and on July 29, 2010,
the Board of Directors extended this authorization through July 31, 2011.
During the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Board of Directors approved a quarterly cash
dividend of $0.0375 per common share, which was paid on May 24, 2010 to stockholders of record on
May 14, 2010. In July 2010, the Board of Directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of $0.0375
per common share, payable on August 26, 2010 to stockholders of record on August 16, 2010.
Quarterly cash dividends of $0.0375 per common share were declared in the comparable quarters of
fiscal 2009.
-18-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
June 30, 2010
In January 2010, the Companys stockholders did not approve its Section 382 rights agreement;
therefore, the rights agreement will expire by its terms on August 19, 2010 unless earlier
terminated by the Board of Directors.
NOTE M COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Warranty Claims
The Company typically provides its homebuyers with a ten-year limited warranty for major
defects in structural elements such as framing components and foundation systems, a two-year
limited warranty on major mechanical systems, and a one-year limited warranty on other construction
components. The Companys warranty liability is based upon historical warranty cost experience in
each market in which it operates and is adjusted as appropriate to reflect qualitative risks
associated with the types of homes built and the geographic areas in which they are built.
At June 30, 2010, the Company had liabilities of $3.3 million for the remaining repair costs
of homes in its South Florida and Louisiana markets constructed during 2005 through 2007 which
contain or are suspected to contain allegedly defective drywall manufactured in China (Chinese
Drywall) that may be responsible for accelerated corrosion of certain metals in the home. The
Company first learned of this potential issue during fiscal 2009 through customer inquiries. The
Company has identified approximately 90 homes which contain or are suspected to contain Chinese
Drywall through a review of the supply channel for its homes constructed in these markets and of
the warranty claims received in these markets as well as testing of specific homes. Through June
30, 2010, the Company has spent approximately $4.0 million to remediate these homes. While the
Company will seek reimbursement for these remediation costs from various sources, it has not
recorded a receivable for potential recoveries as of June 30, 2010 given the early stage of this
matter. The Company is continuing its investigation to determine if there are additional homes with
the Chinese Drywall in these markets, which if found, would likely require the Company to further
increase its warranty reserve for this matter in the future. The remaining costs accrued to
complete this remediation are based on the Companys estimate of future repair costs. If the actual
costs to remediate the homes differ from the estimated costs, the Company may revise its warranty
estimate. As of June 30, 2010, the Company has been named as a defendant in several lawsuits in
Louisiana and Florida pertaining to Chinese Drywall. As these actions are still in their early
stages, the Company is unable to express an opinion as to the amount of damages, if any.
Changes in the Companys warranty liability during the three and nine-month periods ended June
30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Warranty liability, beginning of period |
|
$ |
49.6 |
|
|
$ |
67.0 |
|
|
$ |
59.6 |
|
|
$ |
83.4 |
|
Warranties issued |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
Changes in liability for pre-existing warranties |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
|
|
(12.9 |
) |
Settlements made |
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
(19.3 |
) |
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty liability, end of period |
|
$ |
49.2 |
|
|
$ |
64.6 |
|
|
$ |
49.2 |
|
|
$ |
64.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance and Legal Claims
The Company has been named as defendant in various claims, complaints and other legal
actions including construction defect claims on closed homes and other claims and lawsuits incurred
in the ordinary course of business, including employment matters, personal injury claims, land
development issues, contract disputes and claims related to its mortgage activities. The Company
has established reserves for these contingencies, based on the expected costs of the claims. The
Companys estimates of such reserves are based on the facts and circumstances of individual pending
claims and historical data and trends, including costs relative to revenues, home closings and
product types, and include estimates of the costs of construction defect claims incurred but not
yet reported. These reserve estimates are subject to ongoing revision as the circumstances of
individual pending claims and historical
-19-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
June 30, 2010
data and trends change. Adjustments to estimated reserves
are recorded in the accounting period in which the change in estimate occurs. The Companys
liabilities for these items were $553.4 million and $534.0 million at June 30, 2010 and
September 30, 2009, respectively, and are included in homebuilding accrued expenses and other
liabilities
in the consolidated balance sheets. Related to the contingencies for construction defect
claims and estimates of construction defect claims incurred but not yet reported, and other legal
claims and lawsuits incurred in the ordinary course of business, the Company estimates and records
insurance receivables for these matters under applicable insurance policies when recovery is
probable. Additionally, the Company may have the ability to recover a portion of its legal expenses
from its subcontractors when the Company has been named as an additional insured on their insurance
policies. Estimates of the Companys insurance receivables related to these matters totaled $240.2
million and $234.6 million at June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively, and are included
in homebuilding other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. Expenses related to these items
were approximately $34.6 million and $33.0 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Management believes that, while the outcome of such contingencies cannot be predicted with
certainty, the liabilities arising from these matters will not have a material adverse effect on
the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. To the extent
the liability arising from the ultimate resolution of any matter exceeds managements estimates
reflected in the recorded reserves relating to these matters, the Company would incur additional
charges that could be significant.
Land and Lot Option Purchase Contracts
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into land and lot option purchase
contracts in order to procure land or lots for the construction of homes. At June 30, 2010, the
Company had total deposits of $10.6 million, consisting of cash deposits of $8.8 million,
promissory notes of $1.6 million, and letters of credit and surety bonds of $0.2 million, to
purchase land and lots with a total remaining purchase price of $921.3 million. Within the land and
lot option purchase contracts at June 30, 2010, there were a limited number of contracts,
representing $4.0 million of remaining purchase price, subject to specific performance clauses
which may require the Company to purchase the land or lots upon the land sellers meeting their
obligations. The majority of land and lots under contract are currently expected to be purchased
within three years, based on the Companys assumptions as to the extent it will exercise its
options to purchase such land and lots.
Other Commitments
In the normal course of its business activities, the Company provides standby letters of
credit and surety bonds, issued by third parties, to secure performance under various contracts. At
June 30, 2010, the Company had outstanding letters of credit of $56.1 million, all of which were
cash collateralized, and surety bonds of $907.9 million. The Company has secured letter of credit
agreements with five banks that require it to deposit cash, in an amount approximating the balance
of letters of credit outstanding, as collateral with the issuing banks. At June 30, 2010 and
September 30, 2009, the amount of cash restricted for this purpose totaled $57.2 million and $53.3
million, respectively, and is included in homebuilding restricted cash on the Companys
consolidated balance sheets.
-20-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
June 30, 2010
NOTE N OTHER ASSETS AND ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER LIABILITIES
The Companys homebuilding other assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Insurance receivables |
|
$ |
240.2 |
|
|
$ |
234.6 |
|
Accounts and notes receivable |
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
50.7 |
|
Prepaid assets (1) |
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
39.0 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
132.8 |
|
|
|
108.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
417.8 |
|
|
$ |
433.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The balance of prepaid assets at September 30, 2009 has been
retrospectively adjusted to reflect the change in accounting for
convertible debt as described in Note A. |
The Companys homebuilding accrued expenses and other liabilities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Construction defect and other litigation liabilities |
|
$ |
553.4 |
|
|
$ |
534.0 |
|
Employee compensation and related liabilities |
|
|
97.8 |
|
|
|
98.5 |
|
Warranty liability |
|
|
49.2 |
|
|
|
59.6 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
40.2 |
|
|
|
53.5 |
|
Federal and state income tax liabilities |
|
|
78.2 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
131.3 |
|
|
|
162.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
950.1 |
|
|
$ |
932.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE O RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 2009, the FASB revised the authoritative guidance for accounting for transfers of
financial assets, which requires enhanced disclosures regarding transfers of financial assets,
including securitization transactions, and continuing exposure to the related risks. The guidance
eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and changes the requirements for
derecognizing financial assets. The guidance is effective for the Company beginning October 1,
2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance; however, it is not
expected to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
In June 2009, the FASB revised the authoritative guidance for consolidating variable interest
entities, which changes how a company determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized
or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The determination
of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an
entitys purpose and design and a companys ability to direct the activities of the entity that
most significantly impact the entitys economic performance. The guidance is effective for the
Company beginning October 1, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption
of this guidance; however, it is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value
Measurements, which requires additional disclosures about transfers between Levels 1 and 2 of the
fair value hierarchy and disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll
forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. This guidance was effective for the Company
in the current quarter, except for the Level 3 activity disclosures, which are effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this guidance,
-21-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
June 30, 2010
which is related to
disclosure only, will not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
NOTE P SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Companys 31 homebuilding operating divisions and its financial services operation are its
operating segments. The homebuilding operating segments are aggregated into six reporting segments
and the financial services operating segment is its own reporting segment. The Companys reportable
homebuilding segments are: East, Midwest, Southeast, South Central, Southwest and West. These
reporting segments have homebuilding operations located in the following states:
|
|
|
East:
|
|
Delaware, Georgia (Savannah only),
Maryland, New Jersey, North Carolina,
Pennsylvania, South Carolina and Virginia |
|
|
|
Midwest:
|
|
Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota and Wisconsin |
|
|
|
Southeast:
|
|
Alabama, Florida and Georgia |
|
|
|
South Central:
|
|
Louisiana, Oklahoma and Texas |
|
|
|
Southwest:
|
|
Arizona and New Mexico |
|
|
|
West:
|
|
California, Hawaii, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Utah and Washington |
Homebuilding is the Companys core business, generating 98% and 99% of consolidated revenues
during the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Companys homebuilding
segments are primarily engaged in the acquisition and development of land and the construction and
sale of residential homes on the land, in 26 states and 72 markets in the United States. The
homebuilding segments generate most of their revenues from the sale of completed homes, and to a
lesser extent from the sale of land and lots.
The Companys financial services segment provides mortgage financing and title agency services
principally to customers of the Companys homebuilding segments. The Company generally does not
retain or service the mortgages that it originates; rather, it seeks to sell the mortgages and
related servicing rights to third-party purchasers. The financial services segment generates its
revenues from originating and selling mortgages and collecting fees for title insurance agency and
closing services.
-22-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
June 30, 2010
The accounting policies of the reporting segments are described throughout Note A included in
the Companys current report on Form 8-K dated February 8, 2010, which updated the Companys annual
report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(In millions) |
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East |
|
$ |
150.6 |
|
|
$ |
84.8 |
|
|
$ |
381.8 |
|
|
$ |
241.7 |
|
Midwest |
|
|
99.3 |
|
|
|
76.9 |
|
|
|
259.2 |
|
|
|
210.3 |
|
Southeast |
|
|
247.9 |
|
|
|
146.5 |
|
|
|
575.8 |
|
|
|
414.2 |
|
South Central |
|
|
456.8 |
|
|
|
270.6 |
|
|
|
1,097.2 |
|
|
|
747.5 |
|
Southwest |
|
|
118.5 |
|
|
|
86.8 |
|
|
|
286.3 |
|
|
|
307.0 |
|
West |
|
|
305.2 |
|
|
|
248.5 |
|
|
|
783.7 |
|
|
|
669.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total homebuilding revenues |
|
|
1,378.3 |
|
|
|
914.1 |
|
|
|
3,384.0 |
|
|
|
2,589.7 |
|
Financial services revenues |
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
67.7 |
|
|
|
39.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated revenues |
|
$ |
1,406.1 |
|
|
$ |
932.9 |
|
|
$ |
3,451.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,628.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory Impairments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East |
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
$ |
9.5 |
|
|
$ |
7.4 |
|
|
$ |
15.1 |
|
Midwest |
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
31.3 |
|
Southeast |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
|
South Central |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
Southwest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
West |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
32.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
97.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventory impairments |
|
$ |
29.1 |
|
|
$ |
102.9 |
|
|
$ |
33.2 |
|
|
$ |
203.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Income
Taxes (1)(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding income (loss)
before income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East |
|
$ |
(4.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(22.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(39.4 |
) |
Midwest |
|
|
(18.8 |
) |
|
|
(41.2 |
) |
|
|
(23.7 |
) |
|
|
(74.0 |
) |
Southeast |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
(30.7 |
) |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
(48.1 |
) |
South Central |
|
|
40.3 |
|
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
81.9 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
Southwest |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
(15.7 |
) |
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
(24.9 |
) |
West |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
(49.5 |
) |
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
(135.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total homebuilding income (loss)
before income taxes |
|
|
37.4 |
|
|
|
(166.2 |
) |
|
|
84.6 |
|
|
|
(315.1 |
) |
Financial services income (loss)
before income taxes |
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
(12.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated income (loss) before
income taxes |
|
$ |
46.3 |
|
|
$ |
(163.4 |
) |
|
$ |
101.2 |
|
|
$ |
(327.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Expenses maintained at the corporate level are allocated to each
segment based on the segments average inventory. These expenses
consist primarily of interest and property taxes, which are
capitalized and amortized to cost of sales or expensed directly,
and the expenses related to operating the Companys corporate
office. |
|
(2) |
|
Homebuilding income (loss) before income taxes for the three and
nine months ended June 30, 2009 have been retrospectively
adjusted to reflect the change in accounting for convertible debt
as described in Note A. |
-23-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Homebuilding Inventories (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East |
|
$ |
526.6 |
|
|
$ |
535.4 |
|
Midwest |
|
|
314.0 |
|
|
|
371.1 |
|
Southeast |
|
|
681.8 |
|
|
|
656.6 |
|
South Central |
|
|
797.2 |
|
|
|
852.8 |
|
Southwest |
|
|
228.4 |
|
|
|
255.7 |
|
West |
|
|
901.1 |
|
|
|
842.5 |
|
Corporate and unallocated (2)(3) |
|
|
115.9 |
|
|
|
152.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total homebuilding inventory |
|
$ |
3,565.0 |
|
|
$ |
3,666.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Homebuilding inventories are the only assets included in the measure of segment assets
used by the Companys chief operating decision maker, its CEO. |
|
|
(2) |
Corporate and unallocated consists primarily of capitalized interest and property taxes. |
|
|
(3) |
Homebuilding inventories at September 30, 2009 have been retrospectively adjusted to
reflect the change in accounting for convertible debt as described in Note A. |
-24-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
June 30, 2010
NOTE Q SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR INFORMATION
All of the Companys senior, convertible senior and senior subordinated notes are fully and
unconditionally guaranteed, on a joint and several basis, by all of the Companys direct and
indirect subsidiaries (collectively, Guarantor Subsidiaries), other than financial services
subsidiaries and certain insignificant subsidiaries (collectively, Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries).
Each of the Guarantor Subsidiaries is wholly-owned. In lieu of providing separate financial
statements for the Guarantor Subsidiaries, consolidated condensed financial statements are
presented below. Separate financial statements and other disclosures concerning the Guarantor
Subsidiaries are not presented because management has determined that they are not material to
investors.
Consolidating Balance Sheet
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.R. |
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horton, Inc. |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,302.9 |
|
|
$ |
52.1 |
|
|
$ |
37.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,392.5 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
298.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298.2 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
58.1 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58.8 |
|
Investments in subsidiaries |
|
|
1,314.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,314.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
1,103.1 |
|
|
|
2,435.1 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,565.0 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
32.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.6 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61.3 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
95.1 |
|
|
|
283.0 |
|
|
|
92.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
471.0 |
|
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
316.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
316.1 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
Intercompany receivables |
|
|
968.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(968.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
5,192.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,809.9 |
|
|
$ |
492.4 |
|
|
$ |
(2,282.9 |
) |
|
$ |
6,211.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES & EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
$ |
352.1 |
|
|
$ |
722.4 |
|
|
$ |
132.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,207.4 |
|
Intercompany payables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
932.2 |
|
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
|
(968.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
|
2,212.9 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
152.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,367.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
2,565.0 |
|
|
|
1,656.4 |
|
|
|
321.6 |
|
|
|
(968.4 |
) |
|
|
3,574.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,627.0 |
|
|
|
1,153.5 |
|
|
|
161.0 |
|
|
|
(1,314.5 |
) |
|
|
2,627.0 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity |
|
|
2,627.0 |
|
|
|
1,153.5 |
|
|
|
170.8 |
|
|
|
(1,314.5 |
) |
|
|
2,636.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities & Equity |
|
$ |
5,192.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,809.9 |
|
|
$ |
492.4 |
|
|
$ |
(2,282.9 |
) |
|
$ |
6,211.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-25-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
June 30, 2010
NOTE Q SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR INFORMATION - (Continued)
Consolidating Balance Sheet
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.R. |
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horton, Inc. |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,871.2 |
|
|
$ |
48.3 |
|
|
$ |
37.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,957.3 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
54.5 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.2 |
|
Investments in subsidiaries |
|
|
1,033.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,033.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
1,118.2 |
|
|
|
2,521.7 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,666.7 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
293.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293.1 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57.8 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
116.6 |
|
|
|
275.3 |
|
|
|
98.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
490.0 |
|
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220.8 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
Intercompany receivables |
|
|
1,280.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,280.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
5,785.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,881.6 |
|
|
$ |
403.5 |
|
|
$ |
(2,313.7 |
) |
|
$ |
6,756.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES & EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
$ |
318.1 |
|
|
$ |
747.1 |
|
|
$ |
145.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,210.9 |
|
Intercompany payables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,243.9 |
|
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
(1,280.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
|
3,075.5 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
68.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,145.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
3,393.6 |
|
|
|
1,992.1 |
|
|
|
250.5 |
|
|
|
(1,280.0 |
) |
|
|
4,356.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,391.8 |
|
|
|
889.5 |
|
|
|
144.2 |
|
|
|
(1,033.7 |
) |
|
|
2,391.8 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity |
|
|
2,391.8 |
|
|
|
889.5 |
|
|
|
153.0 |
|
|
|
(1,033.7 |
) |
|
|
2,400.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities & Equity |
|
$ |
5,785.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,881.6 |
|
|
$ |
403.5 |
|
|
$ |
(2,313.7 |
) |
|
$ |
6,756.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-26-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
June 30, 2010
NOTE Q - SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR INFORMATION - (Continued)
Consolidating Statement of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.R. |
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horton, Inc. |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
370.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,005.7 |
|
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,378.3 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
295.4 |
|
|
|
875.0 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,171.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
75.0 |
|
|
|
130.7 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206.8 |
|
Selling, general and administrative
expense |
|
|
57.8 |
|
|
|
83.9 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143.2 |
|
Equity in (income) of subsidiaries |
|
|
(56.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
Loss on early retirement of debt, net |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
Other (income) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.3 |
|
|
|
47.1 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(56.4 |
) |
|
|
37.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.8 |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Interest and other (income) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
46.3 |
|
|
|
47.1 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
(56.4 |
) |
|
|
46.3 |
|
Benefit from income taxes |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
50.5 |
|
|
$ |
50.3 |
|
|
$ |
9.4 |
|
|
$ |
(59.7 |
) |
|
$ |
50.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-27-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
June 30, 2010
NOTE Q - SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR INFORMATION - (Continued)
Consolidating Statement of Operations
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.R. |
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horton, Inc. |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
860.8 |
|
|
$ |
2,517.7 |
|
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,384.0 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
688.6 |
|
|
|
2,138.8 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,829.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
172.2 |
|
|
|
378.9 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
554.4 |
|
Selling, general and administrative
expense |
|
|
163.1 |
|
|
|
231.1 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400.3 |
|
Equity in (income) of subsidiaries |
|
|
(165.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
69.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69.3 |
|
Loss on early retirement of debt, net |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
Other (income) |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.2 |
|
|
|
148.6 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(165.1 |
) |
|
|
84.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67.7 |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57.2 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Interest and other (income) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
101.2 |
|
|
|
148.6 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
(165.1 |
) |
|
|
101.2 |
|
Benefit from income taxes |
|
|
(152.7 |
) |
|
|
(115.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
118.2 |
|
|
|
(152.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
253.9 |
|
|
$ |
263.7 |
|
|
$ |
19.6 |
|
|
$ |
(283.3 |
) |
|
$ |
253.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-28-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
June 30, 2010
NOTE Q - SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR INFORMATION - (Continued)
Consolidating Statement of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
(Adjusted-Note A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.R. |
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horton, Inc. |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
222.3 |
|
|
$ |
686.0 |
|
|
$ |
5.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
914.1 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
241.7 |
|
|
|
669.5 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
922.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss) |
|
|
(19.4 |
) |
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative
expense |
|
|
56.4 |
|
|
|
76.1 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134.3 |
|
Equity in loss of subsidiaries |
|
|
63.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
Loss on early retirement of debt, net |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
Other (income) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(163.4 |
) |
|
|
(59.4 |
) |
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
63.0 |
|
|
|
(166.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Interest and other (income) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(163.4 |
) |
|
|
(59.4 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
63.0 |
|
|
|
(163.4 |
) |
Benefit from income taxes |
|
|
(19.6 |
) |
|
|
(14.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
(19.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(143.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(44.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.2 |
) |
|
$ |
47.8 |
|
|
$ |
(143.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-29-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
June 30, 2010
NOTE Q - SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR INFORMATION - (Continued)
Consolidating Statement of Operations
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2009
(Adjusted-Note A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.R. |
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horton, Inc. |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
592.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,982.1 |
|
|
$ |
15.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,589.7 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
594.7 |
|
|
|
1,844.7 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,459.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
137.4 |
|
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
130.4 |
|
Selling, general and administrative
expense |
|
|
158.5 |
|
|
|
225.1 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
388.2 |
|
Equity in loss of subsidiaries |
|
|
106.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
70.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70.4 |
|
Gain on early retirement of debt, net |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
Other (income) |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(327.7 |
) |
|
|
(87.7 |
) |
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
106.4 |
|
|
|
(315.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39.1 |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58.5 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Interest and other (income) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(327.7 |
) |
|
|
(87.7 |
) |
|
|
(18.7 |
) |
|
|
106.4 |
|
|
|
(327.7 |
) |
Benefit from income taxes |
|
|
(12.8 |
) |
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
(12.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(314.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(78.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(18.4 |
) |
|
$ |
96.5 |
|
|
$ |
(314.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-30-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
June 30, 2010
NOTE Q - SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR INFORMATION - (Continued)
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.R. |
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horton, Inc. |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities |
|
$ |
344.4 |
|
|
$ |
323.9 |
|
|
$ |
(81.2 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
587.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
|
|
(8.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.6 |
) |
Purchases of marketable
securities, available-for-sale |
|
|
(299.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(299.4 |
) |
Increase in restricted cash |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(309.7 |
) |
|
|
(8.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(318.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in notes payable |
|
|
(888.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
83.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(805.0 |
) |
Net change in intercompany
receivables/payables |
|
|
314.0 |
|
|
|
(311.6 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock associated with
certain employee benefit plans |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Income tax benefit from stock
option exercises |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(35.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
financing activities |
|
|
(603.0 |
) |
|
|
(311.6 |
) |
|
|
81.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(833.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and
cash equivalents |
|
|
(568.3 |
) |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(564.8 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period |
|
|
1,871.2 |
|
|
|
48.3 |
|
|
|
37.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,957.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
end of period |
|
$ |
1,302.9 |
|
|
$ |
52.1 |
|
|
$ |
37.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,392.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-31-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
June 30, 2010
NOTE Q - SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR INFORMATION - (Continued)
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.R. |
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horton, Inc. |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
552.6 |
|
|
$ |
398.1 |
|
|
$ |
151.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,102.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash |
|
|
(60.4 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(63.7 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in notes payable |
|
|
(261.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(126.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(387.5 |
) |
Net change in intercompany
receivables/payables |
|
|
465.7 |
|
|
|
(445.0 |
) |
|
|
(20.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock associated with
certain employee benefit plans |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Income tax benefit from stock option
exercises |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(35.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities |
|
|
171.0 |
|
|
|
(445.0 |
) |
|
|
(146.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(420.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents |
|
|
659.9 |
|
|
|
(49.3 |
) |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
615.0 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period |
|
|
1,261.5 |
|
|
|
90.1 |
|
|
|
35.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,387.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
end of period |
|
$ |
1,921.4 |
|
|
$ |
40.8 |
|
|
$ |
40.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,002.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-32-
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations
should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included
in this quarterly report and with our current report on Form 8-K dated February 8, 2010, which
updated our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. Some of the
information contained in this discussion and analysis constitutes forward-looking statements that
involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those discussed in
these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences
include, but are not limited to, those described in the Forward-Looking Statements section
following this discussion.
BUSINESS
We are one of the largest homebuilding companies in the United States, constructing and
selling single-family housing through our operating divisions in 26 states and 72 markets as of
June 30, 2010, primarily under the name of D.R. Horton, Americas Builder. Our homebuilding
operations primarily include the construction and sale of single-family homes with sales prices
generally ranging from $90,000 to $700,000, with an average closing price of $203,800 during the
nine months ended June 30, 2010. Approximately 86% and 81% of home sales revenues were generated
from the sale of single-family detached homes in the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The remainder of home sales revenues were generated from the sale of attached homes,
such as town homes, duplexes, triplexes and condominiums (including some mid-rise buildings), which
share common walls and roofs.
Through our financial services operations, we provide mortgage financing and title agency
services to homebuyers in many of our homebuilding markets. DHI Mortgage, our wholly-owned
subsidiary, provides mortgage financing services principally to the purchasers of homes we build.
We generally do not retain or service the mortgages we originate; rather, we seek to sell the
mortgages and related servicing rights to third-party purchasers. DHI Mortgage originates loans in
accordance with purchaser guidelines and historically has sold substantially all of its mortgage
production within 30 days of origination. Our subsidiary title companies serve as title insurance
agents by providing title insurance policies, examination and closing services, primarily to the
purchasers of our homes.
-33-
We conduct our homebuilding operations in all of the geographic regions, states and markets
listed below, and we conduct our mortgage and title operations in many of these markets. Our
homebuilding operating divisions are aggregated into six reporting segments, which comprise the
markets below. Our financial statements contain additional information regarding segment
performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State |
|
Reporting
Region/Market |
|
State |
|
Reporting Region/Market |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East Region
|
|
|
|
South Central Region |
Delaware
|
|
Central Delaware
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
Baton Rouge |
Georgia
|
|
Savannah
|
|
|
|
Lafayette |
Maryland
|
|
Baltimore
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
Oklahoma City |
|
|
Suburban Washington, D.C.
|
|
Texas
|
|
Austin |
New Jersey
|
|
North New Jersey
|
|
|
|
Dallas |
|
|
South New Jersey
|
|
|
|
Fort Worth |
North Carolina
|
|
Brunswick County
|
|
|
|
Houston |
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
|
|
Killeen/Temple/Waco |
|
|
Greensboro/Winston-Salem
|
|
|
|
Rio Grande Valley |
|
|
Raleigh/Durham
|
|
|
|
San Antonio |
Pennsylvania
|
|
Lancaster |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Philadelphia
|
|
|
|
Southwest Region |
South Carolina
|
|
Charleston
|
|
Arizona
|
|
Phoenix |
|
|
Columbia
|
|
|
|
Tucson |
|
|
Greenville
|
|
New Mexico
|
|
Albuquerque |
|
|
Hilton Head
|
|
|
|
Las Cruces |
|
|
Myrtle Beach |
|
|
|
|
Virginia
|
|
Northern Virginia
|
|
|
|
West Region |
|
|
|
|
California
|
|
Bay Area |
|
|
Midwest Region
|
|
|
|
Central Valley |
Colorado
|
|
Colorado Springs
|
|
|
|
Imperial Valley |
|
|
Denver
|
|
|
|
Los Angeles County |
|
|
Fort Collins
|
|
|
|
Riverside County |
Illinois
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
|
Sacramento |
Minnesota
|
|
Minneapolis/St. Paul
|
|
|
|
San Bernardino County |
Wisconsin
|
|
Kenosha
|
|
|
|
San Diego County |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ventura County |
|
|
Southeast Region
|
|
Hawaii
|
|
Hawaii |
Alabama
|
|
Birmingham
|
|
|
|
Maui |
|
|
Mobile
|
|
|
|
Oahu |
Florida
|
|
Daytona Beach
|
|
Idaho
|
|
Boise |
|
|
Fort Myers/Naples
|
|
Nevada
|
|
Las Vegas |
|
|
Jacksonville
|
|
|
|
Reno |
|
|
Melbourne
|
|
Oregon
|
|
Albany |
|
|
Miami/West Palm Beach
|
|
|
|
Central Oregon |
|
|
Orlando
|
|
|
|
Portland |
|
|
Pensacola
|
|
Utah
|
|
Salt Lake City |
|
|
Sarasota County
|
|
Washington
|
|
Seattle/Tacoma |
|
|
Tampa
|
|
|
|
Vancouver |
Georgia
|
|
Atlanta |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Macon |
|
|
|
|
-34-
OVERVIEW
During the ongoing slowdown in the homebuilding industry that began in 2006, numerous factors
have hurt demand for new homes on a pervasive and persistent basis across the United States. These
factors include high inventory levels of available homes, elevated sales order cancellation rates,
low sales absorption rates and overall weak consumer confidence. The effects of these factors have
been magnified by reduced availability of credit in the mortgage markets and high levels of home
foreclosures. High levels of foreclosures not only contribute to additional inventory available for
sale, but also reduce appraisal valuations for new homes, potentially resulting in lower sales
prices. The overall economy remains weak, with a high level of unemployment, substantially reduced
consumer spending and low levels of consumer confidence. The turmoil in the housing market has
resulted in substantial price reductions in our homes during the course of the slowdown.
During the first half of fiscal 2010 there were indications of some stabilization of housing
market conditions. The factors supporting the improved conditions included increased levels of
affordability resulting from lower home sales prices; declines in the number of new homes available
for sale; a low mortgage interest rate environment; and the federal governments monetary and
fiscal policies and programs, including the homebuyer federal tax credit, which encouraged home
ownership and home purchases. These market conditions supported our strategy of starting
construction on more unsold homes to provide affordable housing and capture demand from first-time
and move-up homebuyers. Having additional housing inventory available to close by June 30, 2010
resulted in significant increases in our net sales orders during the first half of fiscal 2010 from
the comparable prior year period. During the three and nine-month periods ended June 30, 2010, our
home closings and gross profit as a percentage of home sales revenues showed significant increases
from the comparable periods in the prior year. These increases resulted in pre-tax income for the
three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 of $46.3 million and $101.2 million compared to pre-tax
losses in the comparable periods of the prior year.
As we expected, the homebuyer federal tax credit accelerated sales order demand through April
30, 2010, with the strong sales demand we had seen in our March quarter continuing into April.
Subsequent to the expiration of the tax credit, we experienced a sharp decline in net sales demand
during May and June, and sales demand in July remained weak. The recent decline in demand has
created some uncertainty regarding the strength of current market conditions in the homebuilding
industry and the timing of a sustainable recovery. We are maintaining our cautious outlook for the
homebuilding industry, and will adjust our operating strategy as necessary as we continually assess
the level of underlying demand for new homes in our communities.
Our results for the remainder of this fiscal year and for fiscal 2011 could be severely
impacted by prolonged weakness in the economy; continued high levels of unemployment; a significant
increase in mortgage interest rates; or further tightening of mortgage lending standards, including
reductions in the level of closing cost concessions we are able to offer our homebuyers.
Due to these uncertain market conditions, we have continued to evaluate our homebuilding and
financial services assets for recoverability. Excluding cash and marketable securities, our assets
whose recoverability is most impacted by market conditions include inventory; earnest money
deposits and pre-acquisition costs related to land and lot option contracts; tax assets, both on
amounts reflected as deferred and as a receivable; and owned mortgage loans. These assets
collectively represent approximately 90% of our total non-cash assets at June 30, 2010. Our
evaluations reflected our expectation of continued challenges in the homebuilding industry. Based
on our evaluations, during the three months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded inventory impairment
charges of $29.1 million and recorded additional reserves for losses of $3.1 million associated
with mortgage loans held in portfolio and the limited recourse provisions on previously sold
mortgage loans. The declines in inventory impairment charges and write-offs of earnest money
deposits and pre-acquisition costs from prior years reflect the improvement in gross profit from
home closings experienced during the three-month period ended June 30, 2010 compared to prior
years. We will evaluate whether further impairment charges, valuation adjustments or write-offs are
necessary on these assets in the coming quarters. Additional discussion of these evaluations and
charges is presented below.
-35-
STRATEGY
We believe the long-term fundamentals which support housing demand, namely population growth
and household formation, remain positive. In the near term, however, it is not possible to predict
if current homebuilding industry conditions will improve or if they will deteriorate from current
levels. During the downturn we have increased our cash balances by generating substantial cash flow
from operations, primarily through reductions in inventory and mortgage loans held for sale, the
receipt of tax refunds and by accessing the capital markets. While we will continue to
conservatively manage our business, our increased liquidity provides us with flexibility in
determining the appropriate operating strategy for each of our communities and markets to strike
the best balance between cash flow generation and potential profit. With this flexibility, we are
committed to continuing the following initiatives related to our operating strategy in the current
homebuilding business environment:
|
|
|
Maintaining a strong cash balance and overall liquidity position. |
|
|
|
|
Managing the sales prices and level of sales incentives on our homes as necessary to
optimize the balance of sales volumes, profits, returns on inventory investments and
cash flows. |
|
|
|
|
Entering into new lot option contracts to purchase finished lots to potentially
increase sales volumes and profitability. |
|
|
|
|
Renegotiating existing lot option contracts to reduce our lot costs and better match
the scheduled lot purchases with new home demand in each community. |
|
|
|
|
Limiting land development spending and suspending development in communities that
require substantial investments of time or capital resources. |
|
|
|
|
Managing our inventory of homes under construction by selectively starting
construction on unsold homes to capture new home demand, while monitoring the number
and aging of unsold homes and aggressively marketing unsold, completed homes in
inventory. |
|
|
|
|
Decreasing the cost of goods purchased from both vendors and subcontractors. |
|
|
|
|
Modifying product offerings to provide more affordable homes. |
|
|
|
|
Controlling our SG&A infrastructure to match production levels. |
These initiatives allowed us to generate significant cash flows from operations during the
downturn and achieve improved operating results during the three and nine months ended June 30,
2010. Although we cannot provide any assurances that these initiatives will be successful in the
future, we expect that our operating strategy will allow us to continue to maintain a strong
balance sheet and liquidity position through fiscal 2010.
-36-
KEY RESULTS
Key financial results as of and for the three months ended June 30, 2010, as compared to the
same period of 2009, were as follows:
Homebuilding Operations:
|
|
|
Homebuilding revenues increased 51% to $1.4 billion. |
|
|
|
|
Homes closed increased 60% to 6,805 homes and the average selling price of those
homes decreased 4% to $202,500. |
|
|
|
|
Net sales orders decreased 3% to 4,921 homes. |
|
|
|
|
Sales order backlog decreased 15% to $954.4 million. |
|
|
|
|
Home sales gross margins increased 590 basis points to 17.2%. |
|
|
|
|
Inventory impairments and land option cost write-offs were $30.3 million, compared
to $110.8 million. |
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding SG&A expenses increased 7% to $143.2 million, but decreased as a
percentage of homebuilding revenues by 430 basis points to 10.4%. |
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding pre-tax income was $37.4 million, compared to a pre-tax loss of $166.2
million. |
|
|
|
|
Homes in inventory decreased by 100 from a year ago to 10,800. |
|
|
|
|
Owned lots declined by 1,300 from a year ago to 89,200. |
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding debt decreased by $927.9 million to $2.2 billion. |
|
|
|
|
Net homebuilding debt to total capital decreased 1,320 basis points to 17.5%, and
gross homebuilding debt to total capital decreased 860 basis points to 45.6%. |
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding cash and marketable securities totaled $1.7 billion, compared to $2.0
billion. |
Financial Services Operations:
|
|
|
Total financial services revenues, net of recourse and reinsurance expenses,
increased to $27.8 million from $18.8 million. |
|
|
|
|
Financial services pre-tax income was $8.9 million, compared to pre-tax income of
$2.8 million. |
Consolidated Results:
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share was $0.16, compared to net loss per share of $0.45. |
|
|
|
|
Net income was $50.5 million, compared to net loss of $143.8 million. |
|
|
|
|
Total equity decreased slightly to $2.64 billion, from $2.65 billion. |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operations was $159.3 million, compared to $124.1 million. |
-37-
Key financial results for the nine months ended June 30, 2010, as compared to the same period
of 2009, were as follows:
Homebuilding Operations:
|
|
|
Homebuilding revenues increased 31% to $3.4 billion. |
|
|
|
|
Homes closed increased 40% to 16,594 homes while the average selling price of those
homes decreased 5% to $203,800. |
|
|
|
|
Net sales orders increased 28% to 15,396 homes. |
|
|
|
|
Home sales gross margins increased 400 basis points to 17.4%. |
|
|
|
|
Inventory impairments and land option cost write-offs were $33.9 million, compared
to $215.2 million. |
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding SG&A expenses increased 3% to $400.3 million, but decreased as a
percentage of homebuilding revenues by 320 basis points to 11.8%. |
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding pre-tax income was $84.6 million, compared to a pre-tax loss of $315.1
million. |
Financial Services Operations:
|
|
|
Total financial services revenues, net of recourse and reinsurance expenses,
increased to $67.7 million from $39.1 million. |
|
|
|
|
Financial services pre-tax income was $16.6 million, compared to a pre-tax loss of
$12.6 million. |
Consolidated Results:
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share was $0.78, compared to net loss per share of $0.99. |
|
|
|
|
Net income was $253.9 million, compared to net loss of $314.9 million. |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operations was $587.1 million, compared to $1.1 billion. |
-38-
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - HOMEBUILDING
The following tables and related discussion set forth key operating and financial data for our
homebuilding operations by reporting segment as of and for the three and nine months ended June 30,
2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales Orders (1) |
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Net Homes Sold |
|
Value (In millions) |
|
Average Selling Price |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
% Change |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
% Change |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
% Change |
East |
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
6 % |
|
|
$ |
114.5 |
|
|
$ |
115.8 |
|
|
|
(1)% |
|
|
$ |
223,600 |
|
|
$ |
240,200 |
|
|
|
(7)% |
|
Midwest |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
(34)% |
|
|
|
71.5 |
|
|
|
102.5 |
|
|
|
(30)% |
|
|
|
286,000 |
|
|
|
271,900 |
|
|
|
5 % |
|
Southeast |
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
33 % |
|
|
|
196.6 |
|
|
|
145.4 |
|
|
|
35 % |
|
|
|
188,300 |
|
|
|
185,000 |
|
|
|
2 % |
|
South Central |
|
|
1,754 |
|
|
|
1,845 |
|
|
|
(5)% |
|
|
|
307.1 |
|
|
|
317.6 |
|
|
|
(3)% |
|
|
|
175,100 |
|
|
|
172,100 |
|
|
|
2 % |
|
Southwest |
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
(27)% |
|
|
|
73.2 |
|
|
|
102.6 |
|
|
|
(29)% |
|
|
|
171,800 |
|
|
|
176,000 |
|
|
|
(2)% |
|
West |
|
|
935 |
|
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
(8)% |
|
|
|
262.8 |
|
|
|
275.2 |
|
|
|
(5)% |
|
|
|
281,100 |
|
|
|
270,900 |
|
|
|
4 % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,921 |
|
|
|
5,089 |
|
|
|
(3)% |
|
|
$ |
1,025.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,059.1 |
|
|
|
(3)% |
|
|
$ |
208,400 |
|
|
$ |
208,100 |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Net Homes Sold |
|
Value (In millions) |
|
Average Selling Price |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
% Change |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
% Change |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
% Change |
East |
|
|
1,582 |
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
|
54 % |
|
|
$ |
367.5 |
|
|
$ |
239.4 |
|
|
|
54 % |
|
|
$ |
232,300 |
|
|
$ |
233,800 |
|
|
|
(1)% |
|
Midwest |
|
|
821 |
|
|
|
842 |
|
|
|
(2)% |
|
|
|
233.4 |
|
|
|
227.0 |
|
|
|
3 % |
|
|
|
284,300 |
|
|
|
269,600 |
|
|
|
5 % |
|
Southeast |
|
|
3,159 |
|
|
|
2,087 |
|
|
|
51 % |
|
|
|
589.6 |
|
|
|
379.0 |
|
|
|
56 % |
|
|
|
186,600 |
|
|
|
181,600 |
|
|
|
3 % |
|
South Central |
|
|
5,741 |
|
|
|
4,319 |
|
|
|
33 % |
|
|
|
998.9 |
|
|
|
747.6 |
|
|
|
34 % |
|
|
|
174,000 |
|
|
|
173,100 |
|
|
|
1 % |
|
Southwest |
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
1,455 |
|
|
|
1 % |
|
|
|
255.5 |
|
|
|
249.0 |
|
|
|
3 % |
|
|
|
173,200 |
|
|
|
171,100 |
|
|
|
1 % |
|
West |
|
|
2,618 |
|
|
|
2,299 |
|
|
|
14 % |
|
|
|
748.6 |
|
|
|
629.1 |
|
|
|
19 % |
|
|
|
285,900 |
|
|
|
273,600 |
|
|
|
4 % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,396 |
|
|
|
12,026 |
|
|
|
28 % |
|
|
$ |
3,193.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,471.1 |
|
|
|
29 % |
|
|
$ |
207,400 |
|
|
$ |
205,500 |
|
|
|
1 % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Order Cancellations |
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Cancelled Sales Orders |
|
|
|
|
|
Value (In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cancellation Rate (2) |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
East |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
34.9 |
|
|
$ |
23.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24% |
|
|
|
18% |
|
Midwest |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21% |
|
|
|
12% |
|
Southeast |
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76.2 |
|
|
|
61.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29% |
|
|
|
31% |
|
South Central |
|
|
833 |
|
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140.1 |
|
|
|
123.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32% |
|
|
|
28% |
|
Southwest |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
|
40.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31% |
|
|
|
29% |
|
West |
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62.5 |
|
|
|
99.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19% |
|
|
|
25% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,908 |
|
|
|
1,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
364.3 |
|
|
$ |
360.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28% |
|
|
|
26% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Cancelled Sales Orders |
|
|
|
|
|
Value (In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cancellation Rate (2) |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
East |
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
92.4 |
|
|
$ |
84.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21% |
|
|
|
25% |
|
Midwest |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51.9 |
|
|
|
50.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19% |
|
|
|
18% |
|
Southeast |
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179.9 |
|
|
|
180.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25% |
|
|
|
31% |
|
South Central |
|
|
2,176 |
|
|
|
2,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
362.0 |
|
|
|
372.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27% |
|
|
|
34% |
|
Southwest |
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.2 |
|
|
|
125.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29% |
|
|
|
32% |
|
West |
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168.5 |
|
|
|
275.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18% |
|
|
|
28% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,982 |
|
|
|
5,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
953.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,089.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24% |
|
|
|
31% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net sales orders represent the number and dollar value of new sales contracts
executed with customers (gross sales orders), net of cancelled sales orders. |
|
|
(2) |
|
Cancellation rate represents the number of cancelled sales orders divided by
gross sales orders. |
-39-
Net Sales Orders
The value of net sales orders decreased 3%, to $1,025.7 million (4,921 homes) for the three
months ended June 30, 2010, from $1,059.1 million (5,089 homes) for the same period of 2009. The
value of net sales orders increased 29%, to $3,193.5 million (15,396 homes) for the nine months
ended June 30, 2010, from $2,471.1 million (12,026 homes) for the same period of 2009. The number
of net sales orders decreased 3% and increased 28% for the three and nine-month periods ended June
30, 2010, respectively. Our sales orders during the three months ended June 30, 2010 were
significantly impacted by the expiration of the homebuyer federal tax credit, which occurred on
April 30, 2010. We believe that the tax credit accelerated demand during the quarter, and that as a
result, our sales orders were higher than normal in April but declined sharply in May and June.
Sales demand remained weak in July. If the current weak sales demand persists, our sales volume in
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 will likely be less than the comparable quarter of the prior
year. Although housing affordability remains high, new homes available for sale have declined and
the mortgage interest rate environment remains low, the significant decline in demand subsequent to
the expiration of the federal tax credit has created uncertainty regarding the strength of current
market conditions and the timing of a sustainable recovery.
In comparing the three-month period ended June 30, 2010 to the same period of 2009, the
largest percentage increase in net sales orders occurred in our Southeast region, resulting from
new communities in our Florida markets. Conversely, our Midwest and Southwest regions experienced
significant declines in net sales orders, due to continued weak demand in our Chicago and Phoenix
markets. In comparing the nine-month periods, the largest percentage increases in net sales orders
occurred in our East, Southeast and South Central regions resulting from new communities in the
Carolinas, Florida and Texas, as well as lower cancellation rates achieved in these regions. Our
sales volumes in the future will depend on the strength of the overall economy, primarily
employment levels, and our ability to successfully implement our operating strategies in each of
our markets.
In comparing the three and nine-month periods ended June 30, 2010 to the same periods of 2009,
the value of net sales orders fluctuated significantly among the regions, primarily due to the
change in the number of homes sold in each respective region, and to a much lesser extent, small
fluctuations in the average selling price of those homes.
The average price of our net sales orders in the three months ended June 30, 2010 was
$208,400, a slight increase from the $208,100 average in the comparable period of 2009. The average
price of our net sales orders in the nine months ended June 30, 2010 was $207,400, an increase of
1% from the $205,500 average in the comparable period of 2009. We will continue our efforts to
offer affordable product offerings to our target customer base and will seek to adjust our product
mix, geographic mix and pricing within our homebuilding markets to meet market conditions.
Our sales order cancellation rates (cancelled sales orders divided by gross sales orders for
the period) during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 were 28% and 24%, respectively,
compared to 26% and 31% during the same periods of 2009. These cancellation rates continue to be
above historical levels. Our ability to reduce them to historical levels depends largely on the
strength of the overall economy, and our ability to successfully implement operating strategies in
each of our markets. We anticipate that cancellation rates will continue to fluctuate significantly
until there is sustained stability in market conditions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Order Backlog |
|
|
As of June 30, |
|
|
Homes in Backlog |
|
Value (In millions) |
|
Average Selling Price |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
% Change |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
% Change |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
% Change |
East |
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
2 % |
|
|
$ |
112.4 |
|
|
$ |
117.6 |
|
|
|
(4)% |
|
|
$ |
220,000 |
|
|
$ |
235,700 |
|
|
|
(7)% |
|
Midwest |
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
(37)% |
|
|
|
79.3 |
|
|
|
112.0 |
|
|
|
(29)% |
|
|
|
293,700 |
|
|
|
262,300 |
|
|
|
12 % |
|
Southeast |
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
811 |
|
|
|
21 % |
|
|
|
195.0 |
|
|
|
151.1 |
|
|
|
29 % |
|
|
|
199,000 |
|
|
|
186,300 |
|
|
|
7 % |
|
South Central |
|
|
1,658 |
|
|
|
2,087 |
|
|
|
(21)% |
|
|
|
299.7 |
|
|
|
362.1 |
|
|
|
(17)% |
|
|
|
180,800 |
|
|
|
173,500 |
|
|
|
4 % |
|
Southwest |
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
(47)% |
|
|
|
60.6 |
|
|
|
115.2 |
|
|
|
(47)% |
|
|
|
176,200 |
|
|
|
179,200 |
|
|
|
(2)% |
|
West |
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
(31)% |
|
|
|
207.4 |
|
|
|
267.5 |
|
|
|
(22)% |
|
|
|
310,900 |
|
|
|
277,800 |
|
|
|
12 % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,430 |
|
|
|
5,430 |
|
|
|
(18)% |
|
|
$ |
954.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,125.5 |
|
|
|
(15)% |
|
|
$ |
215,400 |
|
|
$ |
207,300 |
|
|
|
4 % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-40-
Sales Order Backlog
Sales order backlog represents homes under contract but not yet closed at the end of the
period. Many of the contracts in our sales order backlog are subject to contingencies, including
mortgage loan approval and buyers selling their existing homes, which can result in cancellations.
A portion of the contracts in backlog will not result in closings due to cancellations, which
during the recent housing downturn have been substantial.
Our homes in backlog at June 30, 2010 declined 18% from the prior year as a result of closing
homes at a greater rate than our sales pace, especially in the last two months of the June 2010
quarter. Given our lower level of backlog at the beginning of the fourth quarter as compared to
last year, if the slower sales pace we experienced in July continues throughout the remainder of
the quarter, our fourth quarter closings and revenues will likely be lower than the prior year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homes Closed and Home Sales Revenue |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
Homes Closed |
|
|
Value (In millions) |
|
|
Average Selling Price |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
% Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
% Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
% Change |
|
East |
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
86% |
|
|
$ |
150.6 |
|
|
$ |
83.1 |
|
|
|
81% |
|
|
$ |
231,000 |
|
|
$ |
236,800 |
|
|
|
(2)% |
|
Midwest |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
28% |
|
|
|
99.3 |
|
|
|
76.8 |
|
|
|
29% |
|
|
|
283,700 |
|
|
|
280,300 |
|
|
|
1 % |
|
Southeast |
|
|
1,337 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
86% |
|
|
|
247.8 |
|
|
|
136.6 |
|
|
|
81% |
|
|
|
185,300 |
|
|
|
190,300 |
|
|
|
(3)% |
|
South Central |
|
|
2,661 |
|
|
|
1,529 |
|
|
|
74% |
|
|
|
456.8 |
|
|
|
269.3 |
|
|
|
70% |
|
|
|
171,700 |
|
|
|
176,100 |
|
|
|
(2)% |
|
Southwest |
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
38% |
|
|
|
118.5 |
|
|
|
86.8 |
|
|
|
37% |
|
|
|
168,800 |
|
|
|
170,200 |
|
|
|
(1)% |
|
West |
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
29% |
|
|
|
305.2 |
|
|
|
244.0 |
|
|
|
25% |
|
|
|
276,700 |
|
|
|
284,400 |
|
|
|
(3)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,805 |
|
|
|
4,240 |
|
|
|
60% |
|
|
$ |
1,378.2 |
|
|
$ |
896.6 |
|
|
|
54% |
|
|
$ |
202,500 |
|
|
$ |
211,500 |
|
|
|
(4)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
Homes Closed |
|
|
Value (In millions) |
|
|
Average Selling Price |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
% Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
% Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
% Change |
|
East |
|
|
1,630 |
|
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
|
61% |
|
|
$ |
381.7 |
|
|
$ |
240.0 |
|
|
|
59% |
|
|
$ |
234,200 |
|
|
$ |
237,200 |
|
|
|
(1)% |
|
Midwest |
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
27% |
|
|
|
259.1 |
|
|
|
206.5 |
|
|
|
25% |
|
|
|
275,600 |
|
|
|
277,900 |
|
|
|
(1)% |
|
Southeast |
|
|
3,148 |
|
|
|
2,059 |
|
|
|
53% |
|
|
|
573.6 |
|
|
|
393.6 |
|
|
|
46% |
|
|
|
182,200 |
|
|
|
191,200 |
|
|
|
(5)% |
|
South Central |
|
|
6,411 |
|
|
|
4,231 |
|
|
|
52% |
|
|
|
1,096.7 |
|
|
|
745.0 |
|
|
|
47% |
|
|
|
171,100 |
|
|
|
176,100 |
|
|
|
(3)% |
|
Southwest |
|
|
1,657 |
|
|
|
1,624 |
|
|
|
2% |
|
|
|
286.3 |
|
|
|
304.4 |
|
|
|
(6)% |
|
|
|
172,800 |
|
|
|
187,400 |
|
|
|
(8)% |
|
West |
|
|
2,808 |
|
|
|
2,224 |
|
|
|
26% |
|
|
|
783.7 |
|
|
|
663.6 |
|
|
|
18% |
|
|
|
279,100 |
|
|
|
298,400 |
|
|
|
(6)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,594 |
|
|
|
11,893 |
|
|
|
40% |
|
|
$ |
3,381.1 |
|
|
$ |
2,553.1 |
|
|
|
32% |
|
|
$ |
203,800 |
|
|
$ |
214,700 |
|
|
|
(5)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Sales Revenue
Revenues from home sales increased 54%, to $1,378.2 million (6,805 homes closed) for the three
months ended June 30, 2010, from $896.6 million (4,240 homes closed) for the comparable period of
2009. Revenues from home sales increased 32%, to $3,381.1 million (16,594 homes closed) for the
nine months ended June 30, 2010, from $2,553.1 million (11,893 homes closed) for the comparable
period of 2009. The average selling price of homes closed during the three months ended June 30,
2010 was $202,500, down 4% from the $211,500 average for the same period of 2009. The average
selling price of homes closed during the nine months ended June 30, 2010 was $203,800, down 5% from
the $214,700 average for the same period of 2009. During the three and nine months ended June 30,
2010, home sales revenues increased significantly in most of our market regions, resulting from
increases in the number of homes closed.
The number of homes closed in the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 increased 60% and
40%, respectively, due to increases in all six of our market regions. The increase in home closings
reflects the impact of the first-time homebuyers federal tax credit, which required buyers to
close on their home purchase transaction by June 30, 2010, which we believe helped to stimulate
demand for home closings during the first nine months of fiscal 2010. We also believe that our
operating strategy of selectively starting construction on unsold homes, which made
-41-
additional housing inventory available to close by June 30, 2010, benefitted our home closings
volume by better capturing this demand. In the nine-month period, the Southwest region had only a
2% increase in homes closed due to both weak demand in the Phoenix market and prior year efforts to
reduce completed home inventories in that market. As conditions change in the housing markets in
which we operate, our ongoing level of net sales orders will determine the number of home closings
and amount of revenue we will generate.
Homebuilding Operating Margin Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentages of Related Revenues |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Gross profit Home sales |
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
17.4 |
% |
|
|
13.4 |
% |
Gross profit Land/lot sales |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
24.1 |
% |
|
|
10.9 |
% |
Effect of inventory impairments and land option cost
write-offs on total homebuilding gross profit |
|
|
(2.2 |
)% |
|
|
(12.1 |
)% |
|
|
(1.0 |
)% |
|
|
(8.3 |
)% |
Gross profit (loss) Total homebuilding |
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
|
(0.9 |
)% |
|
|
16.4 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
|
15.0 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
Loss (gain) on early retirement of debt, net |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
Other (income) |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
(18.0 |
)% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
(12.1 |
)% |
Home Sales Gross Profit
Gross profit from home sales increased by 133%, to $237.1 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2010, from $101.6 million for the comparable period of 2009. As a percentage of home sales
revenues, gross profit from home sales increased 590 basis points, to 17.2%. Approximately 510
basis points of the increase in the home sales gross profit percentage was a result of the average
cost of our homes declining by more than our average selling prices, caused largely by a reduction
in our construction costs on homes closed during the current quarter. The reduction in construction
costs primarily results from changes in product design, as well as cost reductions obtained from
our suppliers and sub-contractors in prior periods. In addition, the increase in home sales gross
profit is partially due to our efforts beginning in fiscal 2009 to acquire lot positions in new
communities and construct and close houses from these new projects. Homes closed on these recently
acquired finished lots are yielding higher gross profits than those on land and lots acquired in
prior years. Approximately 60 basis points of the increase was due to a decrease in the
amortization of capitalized interest and property taxes as a percentage of homes sales revenues
resulting from reductions in our interest and property taxes incurred and capitalized over the past
year and more closings occurring on acquired finished lots, rather than internally developed lots.
Approximately 20 basis points of the increase was due to the change in estimated costs of warranty
and construction defect claims as a percentage of home sales revenue.
Gross profit from home sales increased by 72%, to $587.6 million for the nine months ended
June 30, 2010, from $341.6 million for the comparable period of 2009. As a percentage of home sales
revenues, gross profit from home sales increased 400 basis points, to 17.4%. Generally, the factors
impacting gross margin for the nine-month period ended June 30, 2010 were similar to those
discussed for the three-month period. Specifically, the improvement in our cost of homes as
compared to average selling price contributed 360 basis points to the increase and the decrease in
the amortization of capitalized interest and property taxes contributed 70 basis points. These
increases were partially offset by a decrease of 30 basis points due to the change in estimated
costs of warranty and construction defect claims as a percentage of home sales revenue.
Future changes in gross profit percentages are impacted by the use of sales incentives and
price adjustments to generate an adequate volume of home closings and are uncertain in the current
housing market.
-42-
Land Sales Revenue
Land sales revenues decreased substantially to $0.1 million for the three months ended June
30, 2010, and 92% to $2.9 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2010, from $17.5 million and
$36.6 million, respectively, in the comparable periods of 2009. Of the $36.6 million of revenues in
the first nine months of fiscal 2009, $24.1 million related to land sale transactions in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2008 for which recognition of the revenue had been deferred due to the terms of
the sale. Fluctuations in revenues from land sales are a function of how we manage our inventory
levels in various markets. We generally purchase land and lots with the intent to build and sell
homes on them; however, we occasionally purchase land that includes commercially zoned parcels
which we typically sell to commercial developers, and we also sell residential lots or land parcels
to manage our land and lot supply. Land and lot sales occur at unpredictable intervals and varying
degrees of profitability. Therefore, the revenues and gross profit from land sales fluctuate from
period to period. As of June 30, 2010, we had $4.4 million of land held for sale which we expect to
sell in the next twelve months.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory Impairments and Land Option Cost Write-offs |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land Option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land Option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
|
Cost Write-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
|
Cost Write-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairments |
|
|
(Recoveries) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Impairments |
|
|
(Recoveries) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
East |
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
$ |
9.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
10.0 |
|
Midwest |
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
|
Southeast |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
South Central |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
Southwest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
(0.3) |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
West |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
32.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
30.3 |
|
|
$ |
102.9 |
|
|
$ |
7.9 |
|
|
$ |
110.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land Option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land Option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
|
Cost Write-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
|
Cost Write-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairments |
|
|
(Recoveries) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Impairments |
|
|
(Recoveries) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
East |
|
$ |
7.4 |
|
|
$ |
(0.2) |
|
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
|
$ |
15.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
15.5 |
|
Midwest |
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
31.3 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
38.9 |
|
Southeast |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
|
South Central |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
Southwest |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
West |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
97.7 |
|
|
|
(0.5) |
|
|
|
97.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
33.9 |
|
|
$ |
203.0 |
|
|
$ |
12.2 |
|
|
$ |
215.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-43-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Values of Potentially Impaired and Impaired Communities |
|
|
at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory with |
|
Analysis of Communities with Impairment Charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment Indicators |
|
Recorded at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Number of |
|
Carrying |
|
Number of |
|
Prior to |
|
|
|
|
Communities (1) |
|
Communities (1) |
|
Value |
|
Communities (1) |
|
Impairment |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(Values in millions) |
|
East |
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
54.7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
12.0 |
|
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
Midwest |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
138.4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
58.1 |
|
|
|
41.1 |
|
Southeast |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
67.3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
South Central |
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
38.3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Southwest |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
42.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
West |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
94.6 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,078 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
$ |
435.7 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
$ |
86.8 |
|
|
$ |
57.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Values of Potentially Impaired and Impaired Communities |
|
|
at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory with |
|
Analysis of Communities with Impairment Charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment Indicators |
|
Recorded
at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Number of |
|
Carrying |
|
Number of |
|
Prior to |
|
|
|
|
Communities (1) |
|
Communities (1) |
|
Value |
|
Communities (1) |
|
Impairment |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(Values in millions) |
|
East |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
$ |
157.8 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
85.1 |
|
|
$ |
45.9 |
|
Midwest |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
143.0 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
47.8 |
|
|
|
32.8 |
|
Southeast |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
97.5 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
|
|
29.8 |
|
South Central |
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
106.2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
Southwest |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
104.3 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
53.0 |
|
|
|
36.2 |
|
West |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
354.3 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
176.8 |
|
|
|
87.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
$ |
963.1 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
$ |
421.3 |
|
|
$ |
246.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
A community may consist of land held for development, residential land and lots developed and
under development, and construction in progress and finished homes. A particular community
often includes inventory in more than one category. Further, a community may contain multiple
parcels with varying product types (e.g. entry level and move-up single family detached, as
well as attached product types). Some communities have no homes under construction, finished
homes, or current home sales efforts or activity. |
Inventory Impairments and Land Option Cost Write-offs
At June 30, 2010, the assumptions utilized in our quarterly impairment evaluation reflected
our expectation of continued challenging conditions and uncertainties in the homebuilding industry
and in our markets. As we continue to analyze the strength of the economy (measured largely in
terms of job growth), the level of underlying demand for new homes and our operating performance,
the level of impairments in future quarters will likely fluctuate and may increase.
Our impairment evaluation indicated communities with a combined carrying value of $435.7
million as of June 30, 2010 had indicators of potential impairment, and these communities were
evaluated for impairment. The analysis of the large majority of these communities assumed that
sales prices in future periods will be equal to or lower than current sales order prices in each
community, or in comparable communities, in order to generate an acceptable absorption rate. For a
minority of communities that we do not intend to develop or operate in current market conditions,
slight increases over current sales prices were assumed. While it is difficult to determine a
timeframe for a given community in the current market conditions, we estimated the remaining lives
of these communities to range from six months to in excess of ten years. In performing this
analysis, we utilized a range of
discount rates for communities of 14% to 20%, which is consistent with the rates used in
fiscal 2009. Through this
-44-
evaluation process, we determined that communities with a carrying value
of $86.8 million as of June 30, 2010, were impaired. As a result, during the three months ended
June 30, 2010, we recorded impairment charges of $29.1 million to reduce the carrying value of the
impaired communities to their estimated fair value, as compared to $102.9 million in the same
period of the prior year. During the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, impairment charges
totaled $33.2 million and $203.0 million, respectively. In the three months ended June 30, 2010,
approximately 93% of the impairment charges were recorded to residential land and lots and land
held for development, and approximately 7% of the charges were recorded to construction in progress
and finished homes inventory, compared to 89% and 11%, respectively, in the same period of 2009. In
the nine months ended June 30, 2010, approximately 91% of the impairment charges were recorded to
residential land and lots and land held for development, and approximately 9% of the charges were
recorded to construction in progress and finished homes inventory, compared to 79% and 21%,
respectively, in the same period of 2009.
Of the remaining $348.9 million carrying value of communities with impairment indicators which
were determined not to be impaired at June 30, 2010, the largest concentrations were in California
(22%), Illinois (17%), Florida (15%), Arizona (11%) and Texas (10%). It is possible that our
estimate of undiscounted cash flows from these communities may change and could result in a future
need to record impairment charges to adjust the carrying value of these assets to their estimated
fair value. There are several factors which could lead to changes in the estimates of undiscounted
future cash flows for a given community. The most significant of these include pricing and
incentive levels actually realized by the community, the rate at which the homes are sold and the
costs incurred to construct the homes. The pricing and incentive levels are often inter-related
with sales pace within a community such that a price reduction can be expected to increase the
sales pace. Further, both of these factors are heavily influenced by the competitive pressures
facing a given community from both new homes and existing homes, some of which may result from
foreclosures. If conditions worsen in the broader economy, homebuilding industry or specific
markets in which we operate, and as we re-evaluate specific community pricing and incentives,
construction and development plans, and our overall land sale strategies, we may be required to
evaluate additional communities or re-evaluate previously impaired communities for potential
impairment. These evaluations may result in additional impairment charges.
During the three-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, we wrote off $1.2 million and
$7.9 million, respectively, of earnest money deposits and pre-acquisition costs related to land
option contracts which are not expected to be acquired. During the nine-month periods ended June
30, 2010 and 2009, we wrote off $0.7 million and $12.2 million, respectively, of such deposits and
costs. At June 30, 2010, outstanding earnest money deposits and pre-acquisition costs associated
with our portfolio of land and lot option purchase contracts totaled $10.6 million and $10.3
million, respectively.
In the three and nine-month periods ended June 30, 2010, inventory impairment charges and
write-offs of earnest money deposits and pre-acquisition costs reduced total homebuilding gross
profit as a percentage of homebuilding revenues by approximately 220 basis points and 100 basis
points, respectively, compared to 1,210 basis points and 830 basis points, respectively, in the
same periods of 2009.
Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) Expense
SG&A expense from homebuilding activities increased by 7% to $143.2 million in the three
months ended June 30, 2010, and 3% to $400.3 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2010, from
the comparable periods of 2009. As a percentage of homebuilding revenues, SG&A expense decreased
430 basis points, to 10.4% and 320 basis points, to 11.8% in the three and nine-month periods ended
June 30, 2010, respectively, from 14.7% and 15.0% in the comparable periods of 2009. The largest
component of our homebuilding SG&A expense is employee compensation and related costs, which
represented 60% of SG&A costs in the three and nine-month periods ended June 30, 2010, and 55% of
SG&A costs in the comparable periods of fiscal 2009. These costs increased by 16%, to $86.5 million
in the three months ended June 30, 2010 and by 12%, to $238.3 million in the nine months ended June
30, 2010, from the comparable periods of 2009. Our homebuilding operations employed approximately
2,565 and 2,280 employees at June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
A portion of compensation expense relates to our long-term incentive bonus program, which
provides for the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors to grant performance units to our
Chairman of the Board and our Chief Executive Officer. The actual number of performance units
earned is based upon our level of performance on defined metrics as compared to a group of our
peers. The earned award will have a value equal to the number of earned units multiplied by the
closing price of our common stock at the end of the performance period and may be
-45-
paid in cash, equity or a combination of both. The Compensation Committee has the discretion
to reduce the number of performance units awarded from the number of units earned. Performance
units were granted in 2008 and 2009 with 33-month performance periods ending on September 30, 2010
and 2011, respectively. Our liability for these awards is based on our performance against the peer
group, the elapsed portion of the performance period and our stock price as of each reporting date,
and assumes no future reduction of the earned performance units by the Compensation Committee.
Because the values of the earned performance units are dependent on our performance and our common
stock price, and because the final award can be reduced at the discretion of the Compensation
Committee, this liability can be subject to a great deal of volatility. The liability related to
the 2008 and 2009 performance unit grants was $16.8 million and $11.3 million at June 30, 2010 and
September 30, 2009, respectively. Expenses related to these grants were $0.1 million and $5.6
million for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and $1.2 million and $3.6
million for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
Our homebuilding SG&A expense as a percentage of revenues can vary significantly between
quarters, depending largely on the fluctuations in quarterly revenue levels. We continually attempt
to adjust our SG&A infrastructure to support our expected closings volume; however, we cannot make
assurances that our actions will permit us to maintain or improve upon the current SG&A expense as
a percentage of revenues. It has become more difficult to reduce SG&A expense as the size of our
operations has decreased. If revenues decrease and we are unable to sufficiently adjust our SG&A,
future SG&A expense as a percentage of revenues will increase.
Interest Incurred
We capitalize homebuilding interest costs to inventory during active development and
construction. Due to the decrease in the size of our operations, our inventory under active
development and construction has been lower than our debt level; therefore, a portion of our
interest incurred must be expensed. We expensed $19.6 million and $69.3 million of interest
incurred during the three and nine-month periods ended June 30, 2010, compared to $21.8 million and
$70.4 million in the same periods of 2009.
Interest amortized to cost of sales, excluding interest written off with inventory impairment
charges, was 3.4% of total home and land/lot cost of sales in both the three and nine-month periods
ended June 30, 2010, compared to 3.7% and 4.0%, respectively, in the same periods of 2009. Interest
incurred is related to the average level of our homebuilding debt outstanding during the period.
Comparing the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 with the same periods of 2009, interest
incurred related to homebuilding debt decreased 10% to $41.3 million, and 10% to $136.9 million,
respectively, primarily due to decreases in our average homebuilding debt.
Gain/Loss on Early Retirement of Debt
We retired $345.2 million and $752.7 million of the principal amounts of our senior and senior
subordinated notes prior to their maturity during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010,
respectively, compared to $87.8 million and $308.3 million in the same periods of 2009. We
recognized net losses of $8.3 million and $6.7 million in the three and nine months ended June 30,
2010, respectively, related to the early retirement of these notes compared to net gains of $3.7
million and $12.0 million in the comparable periods of 2009. The gains in the 2009 periods were
offset by a $7.6 million loss resulting from the write-off of unamortized fees in connection with
the early termination of our revolving credit facility in May 2009.
Other Income
Other income, net of other expenses, associated with homebuilding activities was $1.7 million
and $6.5 million in the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to $2.2
million and $8.7 million in the same periods of 2009. The largest component of other income in all
four periods was interest income.
-46-
Homebuilding Results by Reporting Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
% of |
|
|
Homebuilding |
|
Before |
|
Region |
|
Homebuilding |
|
Before |
|
Region |
|
|
Revenues |
|
Income Taxes (1) |
|
Revenues |
|
Revenues |
|
Income Taxes (1) |
|
Revenues |
|
|
(In millions) |
East |
|
$ |
150.6 |
|
|
$ |
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
)% |
|
$ |
84.8 |
|
|
$ |
(22.7 |
) |
|
|
(26.8 |
)% |
Midwest |
|
|
99.3 |
|
|
|
(18.8 |
) |
|
|
(18.9 |
)% |
|
|
76.9 |
|
|
|
(41.2 |
) |
|
|
(53.6 |
)% |
Southeast |
|
|
247.9 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
146.5 |
|
|
|
(30.7 |
) |
|
|
(21.0 |
)% |
South Central |
|
|
456.8 |
|
|
|
40.3 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
270.6 |
|
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
)% |
Southwest |
|
|
118.5 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
86.8 |
|
|
|
(15.7 |
) |
|
|
(18.1 |
)% |
West |
|
|
305.2 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
248.5 |
|
|
|
(49.5 |
) |
|
|
(19.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,378.3 |
|
|
$ |
37.4 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
$ |
914.1 |
|
|
$ |
(166.2 |
) |
|
|
(18.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
% of |
|
|
Homebuilding |
|
Before |
|
Region |
|
Homebuilding |
|
Before |
|
Region |
|
|
Revenues |
|
Income Taxes (1) |
|
Revenues |
|
Revenues |
|
Income Taxes (1) |
|
Revenues |
|
|
(In millions) |
East |
|
$ |
381.8 |
|
|
$ |
(6.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
)% |
|
$ |
241.7 |
|
|
$ |
(39.4 |
) |
|
|
(16.3 |
)% |
Midwest |
|
|
259.2 |
|
|
|
(23.7 |
) |
|
|
(9.1 |
)% |
|
|
210.3 |
|
|
|
(74.0 |
) |
|
|
(35.2 |
)% |
Southeast |
|
|
575.8 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
414.2 |
|
|
|
(48.1 |
) |
|
|
(11.6 |
)% |
South Central |
|
|
1,097.2 |
|
|
|
81.9 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
747.5 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
Southwest |
|
|
286.3 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
307.0 |
|
|
|
(24.9 |
) |
|
|
(8.1 |
)% |
West |
|
|
783.7 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
669.0 |
|
|
|
(135.4 |
) |
|
|
(20.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,384.0 |
|
|
$ |
84.6 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
$ |
2,589.7 |
|
|
$ |
(315.1 |
) |
|
|
(12.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Expenses maintained at the corporate level are allocated to each
segment based on the segments average inventory. These expenses
consist primarily of interest and property taxes, which are
capitalized and amortized to cost of sales or expensed directly, and
the expenses related to operating our corporate office. |
East Region Homebuilding revenues increased 78% and 58% in the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2010, respectively, from the comparable periods of 2009, primarily due to increases in the
number of homes closed, with the largest increases occurring in our New Jersey and Carolina
markets. The region reported losses before income taxes of $4.3 million and $6.6 million in the
three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, compared to losses of $22.7 million and $39.4 million
for the same periods of 2009. The results were due in part to inventory impairment charges and
earnest money and pre-acquisition cost write-offs totaling $5.5 million and $7.2 million in the
three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and $10.0 million and $15.5 million in the
comparable periods of 2009. The regions gross profit from home sales as a percentage of home sales
revenue (home sales gross profit percentage) increased 740 basis points and 390 basis points in the
three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2009.
These increases were a result of a reduction in the construction costs of our homes closed during
the three and nine-month periods. In the current year three and nine-month periods, the reduction
in the regions SG&A as a percentage of homebuilding revenues contributed 630 basis points and 520
basis points, respectively, to the regions improvement in losses before income taxes as a
percentage of homebuilding revenues, as the regions additional closing volume helped leverage
these SG&A expenses.
Midwest Region Homebuilding revenues increased 29% and 23% in the three and nine months
ended June 30, 2010, respectively, from the comparable periods of 2009, primarily due to increases
in the number of homes closed in all of our markets. The region reported losses before income taxes
of $18.8 million and $23.7 million in the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to losses of $41.2 million and
$74.0 million for the
-47-
same periods of 2009. The results were due in part to inventory impairment
charges and earnest money and pre-acquisition cost write-offs totaling $17.1 million in the three
and nine months ended June 30, 2010, and $25.8 million and $38.9 million in the comparable periods
of 2009. The regions home sales gross profit percentage increased 1,190 basis points and 900 basis
points in the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to the same periods
of 2009. The increases were a result of higher margins, primarily in our Denver market, which also
benefitted from lower warranty costs on previously closed homes. In the current year three and
nine-month periods, the reduction in the regions SG&A as a percentage of homebuilding revenues
contributed 540 basis points and 460 basis points, respectively, to the regions improvement in
losses before income taxes as a percentage of homebuilding revenues. Although these results reflect
improvements over the prior year periods, we experienced a significant decline in net sales orders
in this region during the current quarter. This decline was due to continued weak demand in our
Chicago market, and we expect conditions in this market to remain challenging in the near-term.
Southeast Region Homebuilding revenues increased 69% and 39% in the three and nine months
ended June 30, 2010, respectively, from the comparable periods of 2009, primarily due to increases
in the number of homes closed, with the largest increases occurring in our central Florida and
Atlanta markets. The region reported income before income taxes of $4.3 million and $2.5 million in
the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to losses before income taxes
of $30.7 million and $48.1 million for the same periods of 2009. The results were due in part to
inventory impairment charges and earnest money and pre-acquisition cost write-offs totaling $6.6
million and $8.1 million in the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and $19.8
million and $25.8 million in the comparable periods of 2009. The regions home sales gross profit
percentage increased 680 basis points and 460 basis points in the three and nine months ended June
30, 2010, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2009. The increases were a result of higher
margins on homes closed in the majority of the regions markets, led by our south and central
Florida markets. The increases in homes sales gross profit percentage were a result of construction
costs declining at a faster rate than the decline in average selling price on homes closed during
the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010. In addition, the increase in home sales gross profit
is partially due to our efforts since the beginning of fiscal 2009 to acquire lot positions in new
communities and construct and close houses from these new projects. Homes closed on these recently
acquired finished lots are yielding higher gross profits than those on land and lots acquired in
prior years. In the current year three and nine-month periods, the reduction in the regions SG&A
as a percentage of homebuilding revenues contributed 430 basis points and 250 basis points,
respectively, to the regions improvement in income before income taxes as a percentage of
homebuilding revenues.
South Central Region Homebuilding revenues increased 69% and 47% in the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, from the comparable period of 2009, primarily due to
increases in the number of homes closed, with the largest increases occurring in our Austin,
Houston and Dallas/Fort Worth markets. The region reported income before income taxes of $40.3
million and $81.9 million in the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared
to a loss of $6.4 million and income of $6.7 million for the same periods of 2009. The improvement
was due in large part to the increase in revenue, combined with the regions home sales gross
profit percentage increasing 350 basis points and 310 basis points in the three and nine months
ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2009 due to higher margins on
homes closed in the majority of our markets. These higher margins were primarily attributable to
reductions in construction costs of our homes. Additionally, a decrease in inventory impairment
charges and earnest money and pre-acquisition cost write-offs, which were $0.3 million and $0.7
million in the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to $11.3 million
and $15.3 million in the same periods of 2009, contributed to the regions increase in income
before income taxes.
Southwest Region Homebuilding revenues increased 37% and decreased 7% in the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, from the comparable periods of 2009, due to decreases in
the number of homes closed and in the average selling price of those homes. The decreases in
revenues and homes closed were due to continuing weakness in the Phoenix market. The region
reported income before income taxes of $7.9 million and $13.0 million in the three and nine months
ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to losses of $15.7 million and $24.9 million for the
same periods of 2009. The losses in 2009 were due in large part to inventory impairment charges and
earnest money and pre-acquisition cost write-offs totaling $11.6 million and $22.5 million in the
three and nine months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. The regions home sales gross profit
percentage increased 550 basis points and 300 basis points in the three and nine months ended June
30, 2010, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2009. The increases were a result of the
average cost of the regions homes declining by more than the average selling prices, driven in large part by reductions in home construction costs. In
addition, the increase in
-48-
home sales gross profit is partially due to our recent efforts to acquire
lot positions in new communities and construct and close houses from these projects.
West Region Homebuilding revenues increased 23% and 17% in the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2010, respectively, from the comparable periods of 2009, due to increases in the number of
homes closed which were partially offset by decreases in the average selling price of those homes.
For the nine-month period ended June 30, 2010, the largest increases in homes closed occurred in
our Seattle and Southern California markets. The region reported income before income taxes of $8.0
million and $17.5 million in the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared
to losses of $49.5 million and $135.4 million for the same periods of 2009. The losses in 2009 were
due in large part to inventory impairment charges and earnest money and pre-acquisition cost
write-offs totaling $32.3 million and $97.2 million in the three and nine months ended June 30,
2009, respectively. The regions home sales gross profit percentage increased 540 basis points and
350 basis points in the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to the
same periods of 2009. The increases were a result of higher margins on homes closed in the majority
of the regions markets, driven in large part by reductions in home construction costs. In the
current year three and nine-month periods, the reduction in the regions SG&A as a percentage of
homebuilding revenues contributed 390 basis points and 430 basis points, respectively, to the
regions improvement in income before income taxes as a percentage of homebuilding revenues as a
result of absolute reductions in SG&A expenses, as well as the additional revenue providing more
leverage against these costs.
-49-
LAND AND LOT POSITION AND HOMES IN INVENTORY
The following is a summary of our land and lot position and homes in inventory at June 30,
2010 and
September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010 |
|
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lots |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lots |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controlled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controlled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Lot |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Lot |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option and |
|
Land/Lots |
|
Homes |
|
|
|
|
|
Option and |
|
Land/Lots |
|
Homes |
|
|
Land/Lots |
|
Similar |
|
Owned and |
|
in |
|
Land/Lots |
|
Similar |
|
Owned and |
|
in |
|
|
Owned |
|
Contracts (1) |
|
Controlled |
|
Inventory |
|
Owned |
|
Contracts (1) |
|
Controlled |
|
Inventory |
East |
|
|
10,700 |
|
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
|
14,900 |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
Midwest |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
Southeast |
|
|
23,500 |
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
32,500 |
|
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
|
21,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
26,000 |
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
South Central |
|
|
21,300 |
|
|
|
9,300 |
|
|
|
30,600 |
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
|
22,500 |
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
31,500 |
|
|
|
4,400 |
|
Southwest |
|
|
5,800 |
|
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
7,600 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
West |
|
|
21,900 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
24,400 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
22,500 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
24,500 |
|
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,200 |
|
|
|
27,300 |
|
|
|
116,500 |
|
|
|
10,800 |
|
|
|
89,500 |
|
|
|
19,500 |
|
|
|
109,000 |
|
|
|
11,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77% |
|
|
|
23% |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82% |
|
|
|
18% |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes approximately 6,300 and 7,000 lots at June 30, 2010 and
September 30, 2009, respectively, representing lots controlled under
lot option contracts for which we do not expect to exercise our option
to purchase the land or lots, and have reserved the deposits related
to these contracts but the underlying contract has not yet been
terminated. |
At June 30, 2010, we owned or controlled approximately 116,500 lots, compared to approximately
109,000 lots at September 30, 2009. Of the 116,500 total lots, we controlled approximately 27,300
lots (23%), with a total remaining purchase price of approximately $921.3 million, through land and
lot option purchase contracts with a total of $10.6 million in earnest money deposits. At June 30,
2010, approximately 22,200 of our owned lots were finished.
We had a total of approximately 10,800 homes in inventory, including approximately 1,200 model
homes at June 30, 2010, compared to approximately 11,600 homes in inventory, including
approximately 1,100 model homes at September 30, 2009. Of our total homes in inventory,
approximately 6,100 and 5,800 were unsold at June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively. At
June 30, 2010, approximately 3,200 of our unsold homes were completed, of which approximately 700
homes had been completed for more than six months. At September 30, 2009, approximately 2,200 of
our unsold homes were completed, of which approximately 800 homes had been completed for more than
six months.
Our current strategy is to take advantage of market opportunities by entering into new lot
option contracts to purchase finished lots in selected communities to potentially increase sales
volumes and profitability. We will renegotiate existing lot option contracts as necessary to reduce
our lot costs and better match the scheduled lot purchases with new home demand in each community.
We also will continue to manage our inventory of homes under construction by selectively starting
construction on unsold homes to capture new home demand, while monitoring the number and aging of
unsold homes and aggressively marketing our unsold, completed homes in inventory.
-50-
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FINANCIAL SERVICES
The following tables set forth key operating and financial data for our financial services
operations, comprising DHI Mortgage and our subsidiary title companies, for the three and
nine-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
% Change |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
% Change |
Number of first-lien loans originated
or brokered by DHI Mortgage for
D.R. Horton homebuyers |
|
|
4,119 |
|
|
|
2,925 |
|
|
|
41 % |
|
|
|
10,106 |
|
|
|
8,020 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
Number of homes closed by D.R. Horton |
|
|
6,805 |
|
|
|
4,240 |
|
|
|
60 % |
|
|
|
16,594 |
|
|
|
11,893 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
DHI Mortgage capture rate |
|
|
61% |
|
|
|
69% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61% |
|
|
|
67% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of total loans originated or
brokered by DHI Mortgage for
D.R. Horton homebuyers |
|
|
4,141 |
|
|
|
2,950 |
|
|
|
40 % |
|
|
|
10,166 |
|
|
|
8,093 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
Total number of loans originated or
brokered by DHI Mortgage |
|
|
4,443 |
|
|
|
3,704 |
|
|
|
20 % |
|
|
|
11,046 |
|
|
|
9,948 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Captive business percentage |
|
|
93% |
|
|
|
80% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92% |
|
|
|
81% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans sold by DHI Mortgage to third parties |
|
|
3,984 |
|
|
|
3,469 |
|
|
|
15 % |
|
|
|
10,450 |
|
|
|
10,475 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
% Change |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
% Change |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Loan origination fees |
|
$ |
5.2 |
|
|
$ |
4.5 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
$ |
13.4 |
|
|
$ |
14.3 |
|
|
|
(6 |
)% |
Sale of servicing rights and gains
from sale of mortgages |
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
44.6 |
|
|
|
39.7 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Recourse expense |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
)% |
|
|
(11.7 |
) |
|
|
(24.2 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of servicing rights and gains
from sale of mortgages, net |
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
32.9 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
112 |
% |
Other revenues |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
(13 |
)% |
Reinsurance expense |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
(88 |
)% |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(10.5 |
) |
|
|
(87 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenues, net |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
164 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
202 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage operations revenues |
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
50.5 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
|
|
|
96 |
% |
Title policy premiums, net |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
67.7 |
|
|
|
39.1 |
|
|
|
73 |
% |
General and administrative expense |
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
57.2 |
|
|
|
58.5 |
|
|
|
(2 |
)% |
Interest expense |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
250 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
Interest and other (income) |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
$ |
8.9 |
|
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
|
218 |
% |
|
$ |
16.6 |
|
|
$ |
(12.6 |
) |
|
|
232 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services Operating Margin Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentages of Financial Services Revenues (1) |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recourse and reinsurance expense |
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
32.9 |
% |
|
|
16.2 |
% |
|
|
47.0 |
% |
General and administrative expense |
|
|
67.3 |
% |
|
|
64.6 |
% |
|
|
70.8 |
% |
|
|
79.3 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
Interest and other (income) |
|
|
(9.5 |
)% |
|
|
(8.2 |
)% |
|
|
(9.3 |
)% |
|
|
(10.8 |
)% |
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
28.3 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
20.5 |
% |
|
|
(17.1 |
)% |
(1) Excludes the effects of recourse and reinsurance charges on financial services revenues
-51-
Mortgage Loan Activity
In the three and nine-month periods ended June 30, 2010, total first-lien loans originated or
brokered by DHI Mortgage for our homebuyers increased by 41% and 26%, respectively, compared to the
comparable prior year periods. The percentage increases in loans originated was lower than the
percentage increases in the number of homes closed by our homebuilding operations during the same
periods due to decreases in our mortgage capture rate (the percentage of total home closings by our
homebuilding operations for which DHI Mortgage handled the homebuyers financing).
Home closings from our homebuilding operations constituted 93% and 92% of DHI Mortgage loan
originations in the three and nine-month periods ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to 80%
and 81% in the comparable periods of 2009. These consistently high rates reflect DHI Mortgages
continued focus on supporting the captive business provided by our homebuilding operations. The
relatively higher captive percentages in the current year periods reflect a lower level of
refinancing activity than in the prior year.
The number of loans sold to third-party purchasers increased by 15% in the three-month period
ended June 30, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009, and were essentially unchanged between
the nine-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. Loans are typically sold within 30 days of
origination. Fluctuations in the volume of loans sold for a given period may not correspond to the
change in loan origination volume because of the timing of loan sales, which for any quarter
generally represents the loans originated in the last month of the prior quarter plus the first two
months of the current quarter. Virtually all of the mortgage loans originated during the nine
months ended June 30, 2010 and mortgage loans held for sale on June 30, 2010 were eligible for sale
to the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
(Freddie Mac) or Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA). Approximately 88% of the mortgage
loans sold by DHI Mortgage during the nine months ended June 30, 2010 were sold to two major
financial institutions pursuant to their loan purchase agreements with DHI Mortgage. If we are
unable to sell our mortgages to these or other purchasers, our ability to originate and sell
mortgage loans could be significantly reduced and the profitability of our financial services
operations could be negatively impacted.
Financial Services Revenues and Expenses
Loan origination fees increased 16% and decreased 6%, to $5.2 million and $13.4 million in the
three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, from $4.5 million and $14.3 million in the
comparable periods of 2009. The decrease in loan origination fees during the nine-month period
relates to the adoption of the FASBs authoritative guidance for fair value measurements of certain
financial instruments on October 1, 2008. The authoritative guidance required net origination costs
and fees associated with mortgage loans to be recognized at origination and no longer deferred
until the time of sale. Therefore, during the three months ended December 31, 2008, we recognized
$2.4 million of loan origination fees and $5.0 million of general and administrative (G&A) costs
related to prior period loan originations. Revenues from the sale of servicing rights and gains
from sale of mortgages increased 2% and 12%, to $17.0 million and $44.6 million in the three and
nine months ended June 30, 2010, from $16.6 million and $39.7 million in the comparable periods of
2009. Comparing the three months ended June 30, 2010 to the same period of 2009, the increase in
revenue from the sale of servicing rights and gains from sale of mortgages was less than the
increase in loans sold primarily due to lower service release premiums resulting from a declining
interest rate environment during the quarter ended June 30, 2010. Comparing the nine months ended
June 30, 2010 to the same period of 2009, the increase in revenue from the sale of servicing rights
and gains from sale of mortgages was greater than the relatively constant loan sales volume
primarily due to increases in the net cumulative fair value adjustments related to our written loan
commitments and closed mortgage loans. Charges related to recourse obligations were $3.1 million
and $11.7 million in the three and nine-month periods ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared
to $4.4 million and $24.2 million in the same periods of 2009. The calculation of our required
repurchase loss reserve is based upon an analysis of repurchase requests received, our actual
repurchases and losses through the disposition of such loans, discussions with our mortgage
purchasers and analysis of the mortgages we originated. While we believe that we have adequately
reserved for losses on known and projected repurchase requests, if either actual repurchases or the
losses incurred resolving those repurchases exceed our expectations, additional recourse expense
may be incurred. Also, a subsidiary of ours reinsured a portion of private mortgage insurance
written on loans originated by DHI Mortgage in prior years. Charges to increase reserves for
expected losses on the reinsured loans were $0.6 million and $1.4 million in the three and nine-month
periods ended June 30, 2010, compared to $4.8 million and $10.5 million in the same periods of
2009.
-52-
G&A expense associated with financial services increased 17% and decreased 2%, to $21.2
million and $57.2 million in the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, from the
comparable periods of 2009. The largest component of our financial services G&A expense is employee
compensation and related costs, which represented 80% and 78% of G&A costs in the three and
nine-month periods of fiscal 2010, respectively, compared to 75% in the same periods of fiscal
2009. These costs increased 25%, to $17.0 million and 3%, to $44.8 million in the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to the respective prior year periods. The
increase in the current quarter was due to an increase in the number of financial services
employees to 690 at June 30, 2010, from 570 at June 30, 2009 to support our increased volume and
higher mortgage purchaser underwriting guidelines. Comparing the nine-month periods, the effect of
the increase in the number of employees on compensation expense in the current year period was
largely offset by the recognition of additional compensation expense in the prior year period due
to the adoption of the FASBs authoritative guidance for fair value measurements of certain
financial instruments. The adoption of this guidance resulted in the recognition of an additional
$5.0 million of compensation expense related to prior period loan originations during the three
months ended December 31, 2008.
As a percentage of financial services revenues, excluding the effects of recourse and
reinsurance expense, G&A expense in the three and nine-month periods ended June 30, 2010 increased
to 67.3% and decreased to 70.8%, respectively, from 64.6% and 79.3% in the comparable periods of
2009. The decrease in the nine-month period was primarily due to the adoption of the FASBs
authoritative guidance for fair value measurements of certain financial instruments as discussed
above. Fluctuations in financial services G&A expense as a percentage of revenues can be expected
to occur as some expenses are not directly related to mortgage loan volume or to changes in the
amount of revenue earned.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS CONSOLIDATED
Income (Loss) before Income Taxes
Income before income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was $46.3 million,
compared to a loss before income taxes of $163.4 million for the same period of 2009. Income before
income taxes for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 was $101.2 million, compared to a loss before
income taxes of $327.7 million for the same period of 2009. The difference in our operating results
for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 compared to a year ago is primarily due to the
higher volume of homes closed which resulted in higher revenues, a higher gross profit from home
sales revenues and lower inventory impairment charges.
Income Taxes
The benefit from income taxes for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 was $4.2
million and $152.7 million, respectively, compared to a benefit from income taxes of $19.6 million
and $12.8 million in the comparable periods of the prior year. The benefit from income taxes for
the nine months ended June 30, 2010 consists of a benefit of $208.0 million from a change in
federal tax law which expanded the number of years we can carry back net operating losses, offset
by a provision for income taxes of $3.0 million for state income taxes and an increase for
unrecognized tax benefits of $52.3 million. We do not have meaningful effective tax rates for the
nine-month period ended June 30, 2010 and the comparable period of the prior year because of losses
from operations before taxes in the prior year, the impact of valuation allowances on our net
deferred tax assets and the change in tax law in the current year.
On November 6, 2009, the Worker, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009 was
enacted into law and amended Section 172 of the Internal Revenue Code. This tax law change allows a
net operating loss realized in one of our fiscal 2008, 2009 or 2010 years to be carried back up to
five years (previously limited to a two-year carryback). We elected to carry back our fiscal 2009
net operating loss. This resulted in a benefit from income taxes of $208.0 million during the
nine-month period ended June 30, 2010.
We had income taxes receivable of $32.6 million and $293.1 million at June 30, 2010 and
September 30, 2009, respectively. During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, we received income
tax refunds totaling $471.5 million which resulted from tax losses generated in fiscal 2008 and
2009. The income taxes receivable at June 30, 2010 relate to additional federal and state income
tax refunds we expect to receive.
-53-
At June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, we had net deferred income tax assets of $879.2
million and $1,073.9 million, respectively, offset by valuation allowances of $879.2 million and
$1,073.9 million, respectively. Tax benefits of $81.4 million for state net operating loss
carryforwards that expire (beginning at various times depending on the tax jurisdiction) from
fiscal 2013 to fiscal 2029 are included in the amounts. We assess, on a quarterly basis, the
realizability of our deferred tax assets and record a valuation allowance sufficient to reduce the
deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The accounting for
deferred taxes is based upon an estimate of future results. Differences between the anticipated and
actual outcomes of these future tax consequences could have a material impact on our consolidated
results of operations or financial position. Changes in existing tax laws also affect actual tax
results and the valuation of deferred tax assets over time.
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits (which includes interest, penalties, and the tax
benefit relating to the deductibility of interest and state income taxes) was $76.3 million and
$24.0 million as of June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively. The increase relates
primarily to our election to carryback our fiscal 2009 net operating loss to fiscal 2004 and 2005,
thereby fully utilizing the net operating loss which existed at September 30, 2009. It is
reasonably possible that, within the next 12 months, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits may
decrease as much as $49.7 million as a result of a ruling request filed by us with the Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) concerning capitalization of inventory costs. If the IRS rules favorably on
the ruling request, our unrecognized tax benefits would be reduced, resulting in a benefit from
income taxes in our consolidated statement of operations. We classify interest and penalties on
income taxes as income tax expense.
We are subject to federal income tax and to income tax in multiple states. The statute of
limitations for our major tax jurisdictions remains open for examination for fiscal years 2004
through 2010. We are currently being audited by various states.
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
We have historically funded our homebuilding and financial services operations with cash flows
from operating activities, borrowings under our bank credit facilities and the issuance of new debt
securities. During the challenging homebuilding market conditions experienced over the past few
years, we have been operating with a primary focus to generate cash flows through reductions in
assets and tax refunds. The generation of cash flow has allowed us to increase our liquidity and
strengthen our balance sheet and has placed us in a position to be able to invest in market
opportunities as they arise. We do not expect to generate as much cash from asset reductions in
fiscal 2010 as we have in the past three fiscal years. Depending upon future homebuilding market
conditions and our expectations for these conditions, we may use a portion of our cash balances to
increase our assets. We intend to maintain adequate liquidity and balance sheet strength, and we
will continue to evaluate opportunities to access the capital markets as they become available.
At June 30, 2010, our ratio of net homebuilding debt to total capital was 17.5%, compared to
30.7% at June 30, 2009 and 32.5% at September 30, 2009. Net homebuilding debt to total capital
consists of homebuilding notes payable net of cash and marketable securities divided by total
capital net of cash and marketable securities (homebuilding notes payable net of cash and
marketable securities plus total equity). The decrease in our ratio of net homebuilding
debt to total capital at June 30, 2010 as compared to the ratio a year earlier was primarily due to
our lower debt balance at June 30, 2010, which resulted from redemptions and repurchases of senior
notes. As compared to the ratio at September 30, 2009, the decrease in our ratio was primarily due
to our lower debt balance at June 30, 2010, collection of income tax receivables and net income for
the period. Our ratio of net homebuilding debt to total capital remains well within our target
operating range of below 45%. We believe that our strong balance sheet and liquidity position will
allow us to be flexible in reacting to changing market conditions. However, future period-end net
homebuilding debt to total capital ratios may be higher than the 17.5% ratio achieved at June 30,
2010.
We believe that the ratio of net homebuilding debt to total capital is useful in understanding
the leverage employed in our homebuilding operations and comparing us with other homebuilders. We
exclude the debt of our financial services business because it is separately capitalized and its
obligation under its repurchase agreement is substantially collateralized and not guaranteed by our
parent company or any of our homebuilding entities. Because of its capital function, we include
homebuilding cash and marketable securities as a reduction of our homebuilding debt and total
capital. For comparison to our ratios of net homebuilding debt to capital above, at June 30, 2010
and 2009, and at September 30, 2009, our ratios of homebuilding debt to total capital, without
netting cash and marketable securities balances, were 45.6%, 54.2% and 56.2%, respectively.
-54-
We believe that we will be able to fund our near-term working capital needs and debt
obligations from existing cash resources and our mortgage repurchase facility. For our longer-term
capital requirements, we will evaluate the need to issue new debt or equity securities through the
public capital markets or obtain additional bank financing as market conditions may permit.
Homebuilding Capital Resources
Cash and Cash Equivalents At June 30, 2010, we had available homebuilding cash and cash
equivalents of $1.4 billion.
Marketable Securities At June 30, 2010, we had marketable securities of $298.2 million. Our
marketable securities consist of U.S. Treasury securities, government agency securities, foreign
government securities, corporate debt securities, and certificates of deposit.
Secured Letter of Credit Agreements Concurrent with the termination of our revolving credit
facility in May 2009, we entered into secured letter of credit agreements with the three banks that
had issued letters of credit under the facility. The effect of these agreements was to remove the
outstanding letters of credit from the facility, which required us to deposit cash, in an amount
approximating the balance of letters of credit outstanding, as collateral with the issuing banks.
During the three months ended June 30, 2010, we entered into secured letter of credit agreements
with two additional banks, which also require the deposit of cash as collateral. At June 30, 2010
and September 30, 2009, the amount of cash restricted for this purpose totaled $57.2 million and
$53.3 million, respectively, and is included in homebuilding restricted cash on our consolidated
balance sheets.
Public Unsecured Debt The indentures governing our senior notes and senior subordinated
notes impose restrictions on the creation of secured debt and liens. At June 30, 2010, we were in
compliance with all of the limitations and restrictions that form a part of the public debt
obligations.
Shelf Registration Statement We have an automatically effective universal shelf registration
statement filed with the SEC in September 2009, registering debt and equity securities which we may
issue from time to time in amounts to be determined.
Financial Services Capital Resources
Cash and Cash Equivalents At June 30, 2010, the amount of financial services cash and cash
equivalents was $35.4 million.
Mortgage Repurchase Facility Our mortgage subsidiary entered into a mortgage sale and
repurchase agreement (the mortgage repurchase facility) on March 28, 2008. The mortgage
repurchase facility, which is accounted for as a secured financing, provides financing and
liquidity to DHI Mortgage by facilitating purchase transactions in which DHI Mortgage transfers
eligible loans to the counterparty against the transfer of funds by the counterparty, thereby
becoming purchased loans. DHI Mortgage then has the right and obligation to repurchase the
purchased loans upon their sale to third-party purchasers in the secondary market or within
specified time frames from 45 to 120 days in accordance with the terms of the mortgage repurchase
facility. On March 4, 2010, through an amendment to the repurchase agreement, the capacity of the
facility was increased from $100 million to $150 million, with a provision allowing an increase in
the capacity to $175 million during the last five business days of any fiscal quarter and the first
seven business days of the following fiscal quarter. Additionally, the amendment extended the
maturity date of the facility to March 4, 2011. Effective July 30, 2010, through an amendment to
the repurchase agreement, the capacity of the facility was reduced from $150 million to $100
million, with a provision allowing an increase in the capacity to $125 million during the last five
business days of any fiscal quarter and the first seven business days of the following fiscal
quarter.
As of June 30, 2010, $288.9 million of mortgage loans held for sale were pledged under the
repurchase agreement. These mortgage loans had a collateral value of $268.8 million. DHI Mortgage
has the option to fund a portion of its repurchase obligations in advance. As a result of advance
paydowns totaling $116.3 million, DHI Mortgage had an obligation of $152.5 million outstanding
under the mortgage repurchase facility at June 30, 2010 at a 3.8% interest rate.
-55-
The mortgage repurchase facility is not guaranteed by either D.R. Horton, Inc. or any of the
subsidiaries that guarantee our homebuilding debt. The facility contains financial covenants as to
the mortgage subsidiarys minimum required tangible net worth, its maximum allowable ratio of debt
to tangible net worth and its minimum required liquidity. These covenants are measured and reported
monthly. At June 30, 2010, our mortgage subsidiary was in compliance with all of the conditions and
covenants of the mortgage repurchase facility.
In the past, we have been able to renew or extend our mortgage credit facilities on
satisfactory terms prior to their maturities, and obtain temporary additional commitments through
amendments to the credit agreements during periods of higher than normal volumes of mortgages held
for sale. The liquidity of our financial services business depends upon its continued ability to
renew and extend the mortgage repurchase facility or to obtain other additional financing in
sufficient capacities.
Operating Cash Flow Activities
For the nine months ended June 30, 2010, net cash provided by our operating activities was
$587.1 million compared to $1,102.0 million during the comparable period of the prior year. During
the nine-month period ended June 30, 2010, a significant portion of the net cash provided by our
operating activities was due to federal income tax refunds. Also, contributing to operating cash
flows was the profit we generated during the current period. During the nine-month period ended
June 30, 2009, a significant portion of the net cash provided by our operating activities was due
to federal income tax refunds and the generation of cash flows through the reduction of our
inventories during the period. The net cash provided by our operating activities during the past
three fiscal years has resulted in substantial liquidity and allows the flexibility to determine
the appropriate operating strategy for each of our communities and to take advantage of
opportunities in the market. While we have substantially limited our purchases of undeveloped land
and our development spending on land we own, we are purchasing or contracting to purchase finished
lots in many markets to potentially increase sales and home closing volumes and return to
sustainable profitability. We plan to continue to manage our inventories by monitoring the number
and aging of unsold homes and aggressively marketing our unsold, completed homes in inventory. As
we work toward these goals, we expect to generate less cash flow from asset reductions than we have
over the past three fiscal years. Depending upon future homebuilding market conditions and our
expectations for these conditions, we may use a portion of our cash balances to increase our
inventories.
Investing Cash Flow Activities
For the nine months ended June 30, 2010, net cash used in our investing activities was $318.6
million. Of this amount, $299.4 million was used to purchase marketable securities during the
current period. Additionally, we used $15.6 million to invest in purchases of property and
equipment, primarily model home furniture and office equipment. Changes in restricted cash are
primarily due to fluctuations in the balance of our outstanding letters of credit, which are cash
collateralized under the terms of our secured letter of credit agreements.
Financing Cash Flow Activities
During the last two years, the majority of our short-term financing needs have been funded
with cash generated from operations and borrowings available under our financial services credit
facility. Long-term financing needs of our homebuilding operations have generally been funded with
the issuance of new senior unsecured debt securities through the public capital markets. During the
nine months ended June 30, 2010, we repaid, through maturities, redemptions and repurchases, a
total of $883.6 million principal amount of various issues of senior notes for an aggregate
purchase price of $887.6 million, plus accrued interest. During the nine months ended June 30,
2009, we repaid, through maturities and repurchases, a total of $761.2 million principal amount of
various issues of senior notes for an aggregate purchase price of $748.5 million, plus accrued
interest. Also, during the nine months ended June 30, 2009, we issued $500 million principal amount
of 2% convertible senior notes due 2014. Our homebuilding senior, convertible senior and senior
subordinated notes are guaranteed by substantially all of our wholly-owned subsidiaries other than
our financial services subsidiaries and certain insignificant subsidiaries.
During the three months ended June 30, 2010, our Board of Directors approved a quarterly cash
dividend of $0.0375 per common share, which was paid on May 24, 2010 to stockholders of record on
May 14, 2010. In July 2010, our Board of Directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of $0.0375
per common share, payable on August 26, 2010 to stockholders of record on August 16, 2010.
Quarterly cash dividends of $0.0375 per common share were
declared in the comparable quarters of fiscal 2009. The declaration of future cash dividends
is at the discretion
-56-
of our Board of Directors and will depend upon, among other things, future
earnings, cash flows, capital requirements, our financial condition and general business
conditions.
Changes in Capital Structure
On October 1, 2009, we adopted and applied retrospectively the FASBs authoritative guidance
for accounting for debt with conversion options, which specifies that issuers of such instruments
separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner that will reflect the
entitys nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods.
Early adoption of this authoritative guidance was not permitted. As a result, the prior year
consolidated financial statements have been retrospectively adjusted for the effects of this change
in accounting for our 2% convertible senior notes issued in May 2009. We recorded the debt
component of the convertible senior notes at its fair value on the date of issuance of the notes,
assuming no conversion features. The remaining value of the equity component of the convertible
senior notes was recorded as a reduction in the carrying value of the notes and an increase in
additional paid-in capital. The reduction in the carrying value of the notes and the fees related
to the notes will be amortized as interest incurred and expensed or capitalized to inventory over
the remaining life of the notes. The additional interest expense recognized in fiscal 2009 due to
the restatement was $4.5 million, of which $1.5 million was recognized during the three months
ended June 30, 2009. The recognition of this additional interest expense increased our diluted net
loss per share by $0.01 for the year ended September 30, 2009.
In November 2009, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $100 million of
our common stock and in April 2010, they authorized the repurchase of up to $500 million of debt
securities. The authorizations are effective through November 30, 2010. Repurchases of senior notes
through June 30, 2010 reduced the debt repurchase authorization to $161.3 million.
On January 15, 2010, we repaid the remaining $130.9 million principal amount of our 4.875%
senior notes which were due on that date. On February 24, 2010, we redeemed the remaining $95.0
million principal amount of our 5.875% senior notes due 2013. During the nine months ended June 30,
2010, primarily through unsolicited transactions, we repurchased a total of $657.7 million
principal amount of various issues of senior notes for an aggregate purchase price of $659.8
million, plus accrued interest. These repayments of public unsecured debt were made from our cash
balance.
In July 2010, through unsolicited transactions, we repurchased $46.3 million principal amount
of our 5.25% senior notes due 2015 and $7.0 million principal amount of our 6.5% senior notes due
2016, which further reduced the remaining debt repurchase authorization.
On July 29, 2010, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $500 million of
debt securities and $100 million of our common stock. These authorizations are effective through
July 31, 2011.
In January 2010, our stockholders did not approve our Section 382 rights agreement; therefore,
it will expire by its terms on August 19, 2010 unless earlier terminated by our Board of Directors.
In fiscal 2009, our primary non-operating uses of our available capital were the repayment of
debt, dividend payments and the cash collateralization of our outstanding letters of credit. For
the remainder of fiscal 2010, we will continue to evaluate our alternatives for future
non-operating sources and uses of our available capital, including the amounts of debt repayments,
dividend payments or common stock repurchases, and the level of our cash balances, based on market
conditions and other circumstances, and within the constraints of our balance sheet leverage
targets and our liquidity targets.
CONTRACTUAL CASH OBLIGATIONS, COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Our primary contractual cash obligations for our homebuilding and financial services segments
are payments under our debt agreements and lease payments under operating leases. Purchase
obligations of our homebuilding segment represent specific performance requirements under lot
option purchase agreements that may require us to purchase land contingent upon the land seller
meeting certain obligations. We expect to fund our contractual obligations in the ordinary course
of business through a combination of our existing cash resources, cash flows
generated from operations, renewed or amended mortgage repurchase facilities and, if needed or
believed
-57-
advantageous, the issuance of new debt or equity securities through the public capital
markets as market conditions may permit.
At June 30, 2010, our homebuilding operations had outstanding letters of credit of $56.1
million, all of which were cash collateralized, and surety bonds of $907.9 million, issued by third
parties, to secure performance under various contracts. We expect that our performance obligations
secured by these letters of credit and bonds will generally be completed in the ordinary course of
business and in accordance with the applicable contractual terms. When we complete our performance
obligations, the related letters of credit and bonds are generally released shortly thereafter,
leaving us with no continuing obligations. We have no material third-party guarantees.
Our mortgage subsidiary enters into various commitments related to the lending activities of
our mortgage operations. Further discussion of these commitments is provided in Item 3
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk under Part I of this quarterly report
on Form 10-Q.
In the ordinary course of business, we enter into land and lot option purchase contracts to
procure land or lots for the construction of homes. Lot option contracts enable us to control
significant lot positions with limited capital investment and substantially reduce the risks
associated with land ownership and development. Within the land and lot option purchase contracts
at June 30, 2010, there were a limited number of contracts, representing $4.0 million of remaining
purchase price, subject to specific performance clauses which may require us to purchase the land
or lots upon the land sellers meeting their obligations. Also, we consolidated certain variable
interest entities for which we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary, with assets of $7.6
million related to some of our outstanding land and lot option purchase contracts. Creditors, if
any, of these variable interest entities have no recourse against us. Further discussion of our
land option contracts is provided in the Land and Lot Position and Homes in Inventory section
included herein.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
As disclosed in our current report on Form 8-K dated February 8, 2010, which updated our
annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, our most critical
accounting policies relate to revenue recognition, inventories and cost of sales, land and lot
option purchase contracts, goodwill, warranty and insurance claim costs and self-insurance, income
taxes and stock-based compensation. Since September 30, 2009, there have been no significant
changes to those critical accounting policies and estimates.
SEASONALITY
We have typically experienced seasonal variations in our quarterly operating results and
capital requirements. Prior to the current downturn in the homebuilding industry, we generally had
more homes under construction, closed more homes and had greater revenues and operating income in
the third and fourth quarters of our fiscal year. This seasonal activity increased our working
capital requirements for our homebuilding operations during the third and fourth fiscal quarters
and increased our funding requirements for the mortgages we originated in our financial services
segment at the end of these quarters. As a result of seasonal activity, our quarterly results of
operations and our financial position at the end of a particular fiscal quarter are not necessarily
representative of the balance of our fiscal year.
In contrast to our typical seasonal results, the weakness in homebuilding market conditions
during the past three years has mitigated our historical seasonal variations. Also, in fiscal 2010
the expiration of the homebuyer federal tax credit impacted the timing of our construction
activities, home sales and closing volumes. Given the pace of recent home sales and our backlog of
orders at June 30, 2010, we will close significantly fewer homes in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2010 than we closed during the current quarter. Although we may experience our typical historical
seasonal pattern in the future, given the current weak market conditions and the impact of changes
in federal government programs and policies on the homebuilding industry, we can make no assurances
as to when or whether this pattern will recur.
-58-
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some of the statements contained in this report, as well as in other materials we have filed
or will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, statements made by us in periodic press
releases and oral statements we make to analysts, stockholders and the press in the course of
presentations about us, may be construed as forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are based on
managements beliefs as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to,
management. These forward-looking statements typically include the words anticipate, believe,
consider, estimate, expect, forecast, goal, intend, objective, plan, predict,
projection, seek, strategy, target, will or other words of similar meaning. Any or all of
the forward-looking statements included in this report and in any other of our reports or public
statements may not approximate actual experience, and the expectations derived from them may not be
realized, due to risks, uncertainties and other factors. As a result, actual results may differ
materially from the expectations or results we discuss in the forward-looking statements. These
risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
the continuing downturn in the homebuilding industry, including further
deterioration in industry or broader economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
the continuing constriction of the credit markets, which could limit our ability to
access capital and increase our costs of capital; |
|
|
|
|
the reduction in availability of mortgage financing, increases in mortgage interest
rates and the effects of expiring government programs, such as the homebuyer federal
tax credit; |
|
|
|
|
the limited success of our strategies in responding to adverse conditions in the
industry; |
|
|
|
|
a return of an inflationary environment; |
|
|
|
|
changes in general economic, real estate and other business conditions; |
|
|
|
|
the risks associated with our inventory ownership position in changing market
conditions; |
|
|
|
|
supply risks for land, materials and labor; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the costs of owning a home; |
|
|
|
|
the effects of governmental regulations and environmental matters on our
homebuilding operations; |
|
|
|
|
the effects of governmental regulation on our financial services operations; |
|
|
|
|
the uncertainties inherent in home warranty and construction defect claims matters; |
|
|
|
|
our substantial debt and our ability to comply with related debt covenants,
restrictions and limitations; |
|
|
|
|
competitive conditions within our industry; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to effect any future growth strategies successfully; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to realize our deferred tax asset; and |
|
|
|
|
the utilization of our tax losses could be substantially limited if we experienced
an ownership change as defined in the Internal Revenue Code. |
We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. However, any further
disclosures made on related subjects in subsequent reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K should be
consulted. Additional information about issues that could lead to material changes in performance
and risk factors that have the potential to affect us is contained in Item 1A. Risk Factors under
Part II of this report, our current report on Form 8-K dated February 8, 2010, and our annual
report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, which were filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
-59-
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are subject to interest rate risk on our long-term debt. We monitor our exposure to changes
in interest rates and utilize both fixed and variable rate debt. For fixed rate debt, changes in
interest rates generally affect the value of the debt instrument, but not our earnings or cash
flows. Conversely, for variable rate debt, changes in interest rates generally do not impact the
fair value of the debt instrument, but may affect our future earnings and cash flows. We generally
do not have an obligation to prepay fixed-rate debt prior to maturity and, as a result, interest
rate risk and changes in fair value would not have a significant impact on our cash flows related
to our fixed-rate debt until such time as we are required to refinance, repurchase or repay such
debt.
We are exposed to interest rate risk associated with our mortgage loan origination services.
We manage interest rate risk through the use of forward sales of mortgage-backed securities (MBS),
Eurodollar Futures Contracts (EDFC) and put options on MBS and EDFC. Use of the term hedging
instruments in the following discussion refers to these securities collectively, or in any
combination. We do not enter into or hold derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.
Interest rate lock commitments (IRLCs) are extended to borrowers who have applied for loan
funding and who meet defined credit and underwriting criteria. Typically, the IRLCs have a duration
of less than six months. Some IRLCs are committed immediately to a specific purchaser through the
use of best-efforts whole loan delivery commitments, while other IRLCs are funded prior to being
committed to third-party purchasers. The hedging instruments related to IRLCs are classified and
accounted for as derivative instruments in an economic hedge, with gains and losses recognized in
current earnings. Hedging instruments related to funded, uncommitted loans are accounted for at
fair value, with changes recognized in current earnings, along with changes in the fair value of
the funded, uncommitted loans. The fair value change related to the hedging instruments generally
offsets the fair value change in the uncommitted loans and the fair value change, which for the
three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was not significant, is recognized in current
earnings. At June 30, 2010, hedging instruments used to mitigate interest rate risk related to
uncommitted mortgage loans held for sale and uncommitted IRLCs totaled $283.7 million. Uncommitted
IRLCs, the duration of which are generally less than six months, totaled approximately $195.2
million, and uncommitted mortgage loans held for sale totaled approximately $111.5 million at June
30, 2010.
At June 30, 2010, we had $25.3 million notional amount of forward sales of MBS which were
acquired as part of a program to potentially offer homebuyers a below market interest rate on their
home financing. These hedging instruments and the related commitments are accounted for at fair
value with gains and losses recognized in current earnings. These gains and losses for the three
and nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were not material.
The following table sets forth principal cash flows by scheduled maturity, weighted average
interest rates and estimated fair value of our debt obligations as of June 30, 2010. The interest
rate for our variable rate debt represents the interest rate on our mortgage repurchase facility.
Because the mortgage repurchase facility is effectively secured by certain mortgage loans held for
sale which are typically sold within 60 days, its outstanding balance is included as a variable
rate maturity in the most current period presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
Ending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at |
|
|
September 30, |
|
Fiscal Year Ending September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
2015 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|
2010 |
|
|
($ amounts in millions) |
Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate |
|
$ |
87.2 |
|
|
$ |
205.2 |
|
|
$ |
161.1 |
|
|
$ |
174.3 |
|
|
$ |
794.6 |
|
|
$ |
246.7 |
|
|
$ |
664.3 |
|
|
$ |
2,333.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,308.3 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
9.4% |
|
|
|
7.3% |
|
|
|
5.4% |
|
|
|
7.0% |
|
|
|
8.1% |
|
|
|
5.4% |
|
|
|
6.3% |
|
|
|
7.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate |
|
$ |
152.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
152.5 |
|
|
$ |
152.5 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
3.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
-60-
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the
supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Chief Executive
Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures were effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required
to be disclosed in the reports the Company files, furnishes, submits or otherwise provides the
Securities and Exchange Commission under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported, within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that information
required to be disclosed in reports filed by the Company under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to the Companys management, including the CEO and CFO, in such a manner as to allow
timely decisions regarding the required disclosure.
There have been no changes in the Companys internal controls over financial reporting during
the quarter ended June 30, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are involved in lawsuits and other contingencies in the ordinary course of business. While
the outcome of such contingencies cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe that the
liabilities arising from these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, to the extent the liability
arising from the ultimate resolution of any matter exceeds our estimates reflected in the recorded
reserves relating to such matter, we could incur additional charges that could be significant.
On March 24, 2008, a putative class action, James Wilson, et al. v. D.R. Horton, Inc., et al.,
was filed by five customers of Western Pacific Housing, Inc., one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries,
against us, Western Pacific Housing, Inc., and our affiliated mortgage company subsidiary, in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of California. The complaint sought
certification of a class alleged to include persons who, within the four years preceding the filing
of the suit, purchased a home from us, or any of our subsidiaries, and obtained a mortgage for such
purchase from our affiliated mortgage company subsidiary. The complaint alleged that we violated
Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act and Sections 16720, 17200 and 17500 of the California
Business and Professions Code by effectively requiring our homebuyers to apply for a loan through
our affiliated mortgage company. In June 2009 the complaint was amended to limit the putative class
to California customers only and the claims asserted were limited to alleged violations of the
California Business and Professions Code. The complaint alleged that the homebuyers were either
deceived about loan costs charged by our affiliated mortgage company or coerced into using our
affiliated mortgage company, or both, and that discounts and incentives offered by us or our
subsidiaries to buyers who obtained financing from our affiliated mortgage company were illusory.
The action sought treble damages in an unspecified amount and injunctive relief. We believed the
claims alleged in this action were without merit. In January 2010, the plaintiffs agreed to dismiss
their lawsuit in exchange for a waiver of costs. On April 8, 2010, the lawsuit was dismissed with
prejudice by the court.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to the risk factors previously identified in our annual report on Form 10-K for
the year ended September 30, 2009, we are updating the following risk factors related to mortgage
availability and governmental regulation of our financial services operations and the utilization
of our tax losses as affected by our stockholders non-approval of the Section 382 rights
agreement.
The reduction in availability of mortgage financing has adversely affected our business, and the
duration and ultimate severity of the effects are uncertain.
During the last three fiscal years, the mortgage lending industry has experienced significant
instability, beginning with increased defaults on subprime loans and other nonconforming loans and
compounded by
expectations of increasing interest payment requirements and further defaults. This in turn
resulted in a decline in
-61-
the market value of many mortgage loans and related securities. Lenders,
regulators and others questioned the adequacy of lending standards and other credit requirements
for several loan products and programs offered in recent years. Credit requirements tightened, and
investor demand for mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities declined. The deterioration in
credit quality has caused almost all lenders to eliminate subprime mortgages and most other loan
products that are not eligible for sale to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac or loans that do not meet FHA
and VA requirements. Fewer loan products, tighter loan qualifications and a reduced willingness of
lenders to make loans in turn have made it more difficult for many buyers to finance the purchase
of our homes. These factors have served to reduce the pool of qualified homebuyers and made it more
difficult to sell to first-time and move-up buyers which have long made up a substantial part of
our customers. These reductions in demand have adversely affected our business and financial
results, and the duration and severity of the effects are uncertain.
We believe that the liquidity provided by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to the mortgage industry
has been very important to the housing market. These entities have required substantial injections
of capital from the federal government and may require additional government support in the future.
Any reduction in the availability of the financing provided by these institutions could adversely
affect interest rates, mortgage availability and our sales of new homes and mortgage loans.
Because of the decline in the availability of other mortgage products, FHA and VA mortgage
financing support has become a more important factor in marketing our homes. The American Housing
Rescue and Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2008, however, increased a buyers down payment
requirement for FHA insured loans. Also, in the near future, further
limitations are expected to be placed on seller
paid closing costs and concessions on FHA insured loans. Additionally, effective in December 2009,
guidelines on FHA insured loans on condominiums have become significantly more restrictive. In
addition, increased demands on the FHA have resulted in a reduction of its cash reserves. These
factors or further increases in down payment requirements or limitations or restrictions on the
availability of FHA and VA financing support could adversely affect interest rates, mortgage
availability and our sales of new homes and mortgage loans.
In recent years many of our homebuyers used down payment assistance programs, which allowed
them to receive gift funds from non-profit corporations as a down payment. Homebuilders had been a
source of funding for these programs. However, the American Housing Rescue and Foreclosure
Prevention Act of 2008 eliminated seller-funded down payment assistance on FHA-insured loans
approved on or after October 1, 2008. With the elimination of these gift fund programs, these
customers have been required to seek other down payment programs or other sources for 100%
financing, such as that offered by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). There can be
no assurance that such alternative programs will continue to be available or will be as attractive
to our customers as the programs previously offered, which could cause our sales to suffer.
Even if potential customers do not need financing, changes in the availability of mortgage
products may make it harder for them to sell their current homes to potential buyers who need
financing.
If interest rates increase, the costs of owning a home will be affected and could result in
further reductions in the demand for our homes.
Governmental regulation of our financial services operations could adversely affect our business or
financial results.
Our financial services operations are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and
regulations. These include eligibility requirements for participation in federal loan programs,
compliance with consumer lending and similar requirements such as disclosure requirements,
prohibitions against discrimination and real estate settlement procedures. They may also subject
our operations to examination by the applicable agencies. These factors may limit our ability to
provide mortgage financing or title services to potential purchasers of our homes.
In July 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (H.R.4173) was
signed into law. The timeline and specifics involved in this Act will become known in the near
future. If this or any other legislation requires mortgage securitizers or originators to retain
additional risk, the pricing and availability of mortgage products our customers rely on to
purchase our homes may be adversely affected, and the risk profile of our financial services
business and its support of our homebuilding business could be adversely affected.
-62-
The turmoil caused by the increasing number of defaults in subprime and other mortgages has
encouraged consumer lawsuits and the investigation of financial services industry practices by
governmental authorities. These investigations could include the examination of consumer lending
practices, sales of mortgages to financial institutions and other investors and the practices in
the financial services segments of homebuilding companies. We are unable to assess whether these
governmental inquiries will result in changes in government regulation, homebuilding industry
practices or adversely affect the costs or potential profitability of homebuilding companies.
The utilization of our tax losses could be substantially limited if we experienced an ownership
change as defined in the Internal Revenue Code.
We will likely experience tax net operating losses through fiscal 2010 and have potential
unrealized built-in losses. To the extent these losses are not carried back to prior periods, they
have the potential to reduce future income tax obligations if we realize taxable income in the
future. However, Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code contains rules that limit the ability of
a company that undergoes an ownership change to utilize its net operating loss carryforwards and
certain built-in losses recognized in years after the ownership change. Under the rules, such an
ownership change is generally any change in ownership of more than 50% of its stock within a
rolling three-year period, as calculated in accordance with the rules. The rules generally operate
by focusing on changes in ownership among stockholders considered by the rules as owning directly
or indirectly 5% or more of the stock of the company and any change in ownership arising from new
issuances of stock by the company.
If we undergo an ownership change for purposes of Section 382 as a result of future
transactions involving our common stock, our ability to use any of our net operating loss
carryforwards, tax credit carryforwards or net unrealized built-in losses at the time of ownership
change would be subject to the limitations of Section 382 on their use against future taxable
income. The limitation may affect the amount of our deferred income tax asset and, depending on the
limitation, a portion of our built-in losses, any net operating loss carryforwards or tax credit
carryforwards could expire before we would be able to use them. This could adversely affect our
financial position, results of operations and cash flow.
We believe that we have not experienced such an ownership change as of June 30, 2010; however,
the amount by which our ownership may change in the future could be affected by purchases and sales
of stock by 5% stockholders and the conversion of our outstanding convertible senior notes, over
which we have no control, and new issuances of stock by us, should we choose to do so. In August
2009, our Board of Directors adopted a Section 382 rights agreement as a measure intended to deter
such an ownership change while in effect in order to preserve these tax attributes. The Section 382
rights agreement, however, may not prevent an ownership change. While the Section 382 rights
agreement is in effect, it could discourage or prevent a merger, tender offer, proxy contest or
accumulations of substantial blocks of shares for which some stockholders might receive a premium
above market value. It could also adversely affect the liquidity of the market for our shares. In
January 2010, our stockholders did not approve our Section 382 rights agreement when it was
submitted to them at our annual meeting of stockholders; therefore, it will expire by its terms on
August 19, 2010 unless earlier terminated by our Board of Directors.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Mortgage Repurchase Facility Our mortgage subsidiary entered into a mortgage sale and
repurchase agreement (the mortgage repurchase facility) on March 28, 2008. The mortgage
repurchase facility, which is accounted for as a secured financing, provides financing and
liquidity to DHI Mortgage by facilitating purchase transactions in which DHI Mortgage transfers
eligible loans to the counterparty against the transfer of funds by the counterparty, thereby
becoming purchased loans. DHI Mortgage then has the right and obligation to repurchase the
purchased loans upon their sale to third-party purchasers in the secondary market or within
specified time frames from 45 to 120 days in accordance with the terms of the mortgage repurchase
facility. On March 4, 2010, through an amendment to the repurchase agreement, the capacity of the
facility was increased from $100 million to $150 million, with a provision allowing an increase in
the capacity to $175 million during the last five business days of any fiscal quarter and the first
seven business days of the following fiscal quarter. Additionally, the amendment extended the
maturity date of the facility to March 4, 2011.
Effective July 30, 2010, through the Fourth Amendment to the repurchase agreement, the
capacity of the facility was reduced from $150 million to $100 million, with a provision allowing
an increase in the capacity to $125 million during the last five business days of any fiscal
quarter and the first seven business days of the following fiscal quarter.
-63-
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation, as amended, of the Company dated January 31,
2006, and the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation,
as amended, of the Company dated March 18, 1992. (1) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Certificate of Designation, Preferences, and Rights of Series A
Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the Company. (2) |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company. (3) |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Master Repurchase Agreement, dated July 30,
2010, by and between DHI Mortgage Company, Ltd. and U.S. Bank
National Association, as Administrative Agent, Syndication Agent
and a Buyer. (*) |
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. (*) |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certificate of Chief Executive Officer provided pursuant to
Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (*) |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certificate of Chief Financial Officer provided pursuant to
Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (*) |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certificate provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
by the Companys Chief Executive Officer. (*) |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certificate provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
by the Companys Chief Financial Officer. (*) |
|
|
|
101
|
|
The following financial statements from D.R. Horton, Inc.s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010,
filed on August 3, 2010, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business
Reporting Language); (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii)
Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows and (iv) the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text. (**) |
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101
to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and
shall not be part of any registration or other document filed under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing. |
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended December 31, 2005, filed with the SEC on February 2, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Report on Form 8-A filed
with the SEC on August 20, 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated
July 30, 2009, filed with the SEC on August 5, 2009. |
-64-
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.R. HORTON, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 3, 2010
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Bill W. Wheat
Bill W. Wheat, on behalf of D.R. Horton, Inc.,
as Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and
Principal Accounting Officer) |
-65-